The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2018-03-28 - Agenda Packet - PC-HPC MARCH 28, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca Vice Chairman Macias Commissioner Guglielmo Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Wimberly B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion.Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of March 14, 2018 Page 1 of 4 MARCH 28, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D. PRESENTATIONS AND SPECIAL REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chairman may open the meeting for public input. D1. CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE E. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. E1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00141 —J.R. MILLER & ASSOCIATES — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 39,600- square foot industrial building, and two ancillary equipment buildings totaling 9,166 square feet on an existing industrial site totaling 17.5 acres of land, located in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District south of Arrow Route and west of Rochester Avenue; APN: 0229-111-74 and 75. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration per State CEQA Guidelines for consideration of environmental impacts. E2. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00177 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA— A request to amend Title 17 (Development Code) of the Municipal Code to amend regulations regarding the posting and display of signs in the public right-of-way. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA sections 15061(13)(3) and 15305. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. CONTINUED FROM MARCH 14, 2018. F. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER-AGENCY UPDATES: COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: Page 2 of 4 MARCH 28, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA G. ADJOURNMENT The Commission will adjourn to a workshop to be held in the Rains Room to discuss Pre-Application Review DRC2017-01009— Grand Pacific Communities. I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 22, 2018 seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. _4f Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list Page 3 of 4 MARCH 28, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,725 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Page 4 of 4 VicinityMap Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting MARCH 28 , 2018 ----- --.— _ 0 r ` t E 1 j 1 � U 2 2 — ti ti L � I � � 1 I u N'W NINE WWWWWWWWWWUWUWWII WWF"'JNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIWI NIB Jul.. 19th St:" ................................................ Base Line Base Line if Church Church Foothill Foothill N Arrow I I Arrow J rs e y 8th i —„ w i % 6th w C7 t Y L- y (� 4th � _ � ..�._.._.. 4th Meeting Location: D1 City Hall/Council Chambers E1 10500 Civic Center Drive D1: Central Park Master Plan Update E1: Design Review DRC2017-00141 E2: Municipal Code Amendment RE: Signs (citywide) 10 n gay MARCH 14, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance T:00 P.M. Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca A Vice Chairman Macias �X Commissioner Guglielmo —X� Commissioner Munoz X� Commissioner Wimberly _X— Additional Staff Present, Candyce Burnett, City Planner; Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, Donald Granger, Senior Planner, Albert Espinoza, Asst City Engineer Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Jana Cook, Community improvement Manager B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair,depending upon the number of individual members of the audience.This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None C. CONSENT CALENDARIHISTORiC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1 of 9 C1-Pgl r" MARCH 14, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion.Any item may be removed for discussion.. Cl. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of February 28„ 2018 C2. Consideration to adopt Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) Minutes of February 28, 2018 Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Munoz, carried -0-1 (Cauca absent) D. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony, All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman., Please sign in after speaking.. D1. TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00054—SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA—A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved 7 lot Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT18210) on 4.89 acres of land in the Very Low (VL) District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan on the south side of Banyan Street between Greenwood Place and Laurel Blossom Place; APN: 0225-171-04. Can March 28, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope olthe previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Tae van der Zwaag,, Associate Planner„ ,gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He rioted the applicant offered regrets as she was unable to attend the meeting Vice Chairman Macias opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no cora ment,, closed the/public hearing, Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, carried 4-0-1(Oaxaca absent) to adopt the Resolution approving Time Extension DRC2018.-00054 Page 2 of 9 C11--Pg2 N M , F MARCH 14, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D2, MUNICIPAL. CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00187 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -A request to amend Title 17 of the Municipal Code to enact requirements and standards for the development of wireless communication facilities within the public right of way. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA section 15601(b)(3), This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Jenr)ifer, Nakamura, Associate Planner; ,gave the report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) Commissioner Munoz commented on how this allows staff to coordinate with the fiber optic master playa, He offered suggestions mentioned at the League for Cities that could be ira a future ordinance such as setting timeframes on leases andlor having annual renewals, He asked if the terrors of approval would be indefinite and if we could consider an equipment attachment fee. He asked if the teases would be arllu stable and if they have liability and performance measures andlor secsrrityr deposits He asked if we car)negotiate other forms of exchange to benefit the city, Ms Nakamura said many of these items are covered in negotiated leases with the carriers and they have tirnefrarnes with length of terms, rents and maximum lease periods Nick Chierelli, Assistant City Attorneyo has the City currently holds the option to extend as the rnaximurn terra is currently 10 years. Ms. Nakamura noted that each lease is individually negotiated. She said perforrr)ance standards are covered under the MDR perrrrit so Haat compatibility and location can be addressed and if violations are not addressed, the teases can be revoked if necessary Cornmissioner Munoz said this technology is completely different than anything before as it will require 100s or 1000s of these small cells to gime coverage to the whole City. lie asked if these should be conditioned to prevent them frorn being put in front of businesses1residences. He said we nrayo want to look at this again in the future to see what can we do to snake the ordinance the Cresta Ms Nakamura agreed and said when) we are looking at wooden holes and independent sites we should look at additional siting requirements with residential buffers but the ones on streetlights we have greatercontrol over size, location, scale, look and feel of those She noted Page 3 of 9 C1—Pg3 a i MARCH 14, 2 18 " HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA that the City as the property owner has more power r to control, She agreed that we creed to continue this discussion about leases. She said each lease morphs-and we learn going fiat rrrd, We wN c ontirrerca to dialogue Comrrussion r Munoz s ick the League has created d arra participates ear? a new telecotrimunicalions cofn177ittee and he will share, information as he receives it orranussion r Gughelrrio asked how cables for the cell sites get to throw poles. Ms. Nak; rrrrrra said they have power,and cooduit encased irmde or attached to the fall. W do flat a rate chargeback frac Me pct wr they use w i ienh they,get froin the pole, Albert Espinoza said if the site Cara°t handle all the new conduits,, then we can require theca to pert in a new streaeallic ht so it can handle the new conduit He said we are taking a leek at other, options including scalar We are looking at the aesthetics of throw, Con7/11ission r Gugliealrnoske d if all of the site: quipme nt encapsulated earn the pole. Ms Nakamura said these typically do not have standard shelters like the other larger facilities you see-they are frilly encased For a larger site she said we try to get them to underground their cable arra' if that is not feasible, they have to pay for permits-they will ha've to get an erroroachrr ent1con trrac,tion permit of they have to epee rip streels andstreet sidewalks, if they are already opened tit) the start or, sidewalk then we will also put in fiber network t the sarne time w/n/e it is open, C"carrrrraission r Macias noted there will always be exceptions to the rale "icer Chaimian Macias opened the public;hearing arra seeing and hearing no further comment, closed the public hearing. C ornmissione r Wimberly noted it was an outstanding report Moven by Wiinberly, seconded by Gogh irno, carried 4-0-1 (Oaxaca absent) to adopt the Resolution recommending me=riding prov l of Municipal Code Amendrnent DRC2018-00187 to b forwarded to the City,Council for,final action,. Page 4 of 9 Cl—Pg4 i � urrIU n MARCH 14, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D3. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00177 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — A request to amend Title 17 (Development Code) of the Municipal Code to amend regulations regarding the posting and display of signs in the public right-of-way. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA sections 15061(6)(3) and 15305. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Jana Cook, Community irnprovernent Manager gave the report and PowerPoint presentaborn (cop)" on file). She noted in her presentation that staff is requesting a continuance to allow time for stakeholder groups to hirther, study the mf°orrn tion, and for staff` to f nnuiete any additional changes She asked for a contiinuarnce to March 280', Commissioner,Wimberly asked if this,joerlains to a 60 day period prior to an event -does that include an election referencing political signs. Ms Cook said time regulations are content neutral, so it could be any kind of sign political or otherwise, It can be up a total of 60 days. Commissioner Munoz said signs are typically discussed prior to every efection-this is the third time in twelve years e asked what is driving force this review now as we have dealt with this in the past; the issues are the same-not changed inuch. We care about the realtors, and have a concern they may have lojump through more hoops, He asked why has time situation not charmed, He thought bad enforcement might be the problem because without enforcement the behavior won't change, He said this ordinance may make the job rmmore impossible He asked why don't we leave it alone until we have a real problem, He said we don't have the staff to enforce it and he expressed concern about impinging ori politicians and small business owners, Ms Cook said she disagreed about the problern-as it does exist She said the last political season we had some bad traffic issues created by those signs, She said she has bonen working for 16 months on the ordinance - long before the onset of the political season, CrnrrmMissioraer Munoz said we haver any amore officers than we have staff in Corrsrmrunity Improvernenmt and we really don't have the staff to enforce this. This issue has been with us for many years and we just acknowledge .the presence of political signs nor do we want to infrirm,ge orm the livelihood of realtors. Page 5 of 9 C1—Pg5 MARCH '14, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Nick Glar'relli, Assistant City Attorneys said part of the driver, for many cities is because of a sraprerrae ccacrrt decision iia 201,E He said' sk is regulations targeted at certain types of signs was not content neutral if it created exceptions as as general l rale There is concern about overall enforcement of the si r) rardin rice in light of court's decision, He said the policy issue is there is no rarer is ir� the n rnber of signs. Commissioner Munoz said ifthat is the driver, the report slid not make that clear He said he understands we may have sorne liability if we do not act but wor'rdered if we can ria nra e this Ms Cook said from an enforcement perspective ricdl'rt resew we can do nothing but rafter this is peat in place we will have tools to go after the rrrcxst egregious violators some action carr be taken the said she does not expect 100% compliance, Commissioner t.ugh lr'no said it still seems confusing, There will be staffor volunteers picking up signs What ifsorraeone takes sorraeone else's si„qn down Mr, Ghirelli said that would be cominasl theft. Ms Marek said anyone can volunteer to het'p rernoved signs they need only go through the screening process of our HR department. Commissioner Guglielmos asked how do folks find their signs if they are rernoved Ms, Cook said they can be picked tip at the City Yard they will be held for 30 drags at that one location, Vice Chairman n ascias opened the public hearing, Bill Rue of the Citrus Valley Association of Realtors thanked Ms. Cook, and lir, Espinoza for taking extensive time to explain the proposed ordinance He said they understand it and seems happy with it. He said they actually get more signs with this and also r"a clear tirrre_a 12-hour period The breakers said the clarity of the ordinance is grand e said they understand the triangulation issue of signs rare corners. He said he also did outreach and let members know to not place signs in ADA access areas, He said no other inprit has been received from their rrrernbers Page 6 of 9 C1—Pg u MARCH 14, 2018 „ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA on"irnissiorr r„, Munoz asked oar do ivve r7nanage local busiimsses that put s"wltlns to public Ms, Cook said with temporwy Irr stall ttr.ns right now there is no enforcement blecause we don't have a laiw that ailolws us to. rrrr'rUNSS101170r,Munoz noz asked if we can crrdt°taon this so we ackn iwlei she the 113upferne Court decision amJ we are going to take action Mr, Ghir ltl said otnr crrr ent ordinance violates the d chsl rr, A nsk ofe lawsuit agaOSt the tty is low nsk, The other option is to not rrtlow signs in the public right of way at all or reduce e the nunr iber tie said' he thinks the best practice is to have content neutral ordinal7ce tor., enforcement and city llatllty Moura s. Vice Chlnnan lWacus said he understands why vve shoulddo this I ill always havie a fl7anpoo,wer Yssuie to inanage this and legairnate coricerns need tc,) b taken bac* and considered- Ms, nsider rr-s, Cook confirmed the reCQ17,rn ,Qdah6,'r� is to GOil"IthAlla the, ub9'lc hiearjdrjg to March t” Mr, Citstre,ttt suggestedfiie r° o��l en the�Dubfic heao g, Moven by W'trribi r/)) econded by Gu lieftno carried' -04 (0Cax cabsent) to con6hue the public, hearing to the March 2,8, `It meeting F. COMMISSION B►USINESSIHISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER-AGENCY UPDATES: Non COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS; None G. ADJOURNMENT Page 7 of 9 C1-Pg7 I /l � F MARCH 14, 201 $ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 8:05 PA, I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was Posted on March 8,, 2018, seventy-two (72) hours prier to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. -d Lois J, Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak„ given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker,. If appropriiate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group, To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience, The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item,. To address the Planning Commission, please came forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone, After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name„, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,, you may do so under "Public Comments, ” There is opportunity to speak under this section,prior to the end of the agenda. Mage 8 of 9 C1—Pg8 r u- MARCH 14, 201 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL. CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director AVAILABIi_ITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,, California 91730, These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7;00 a.m. to 6°00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,725 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas,staff reports and minutes can be found at .Cityof C.us. Page 9 of 9 C1—Pg9 s ury r ry ro h STAFF REPORT DATE: March 28, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: John R. Giliison, City Manager / INITIATED BY: Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager9f SUBJECT: CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Commission review the attached City Council staff report dated February 7, 2018 and the draft pian materials. In addition, staff will present a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Staff requests the Commission review and file the report FISCAL IMPACT: The update for the Central Park Master Plan was approved in the FY17-18 budget. However, there is currently no funding to build any projects identified during the Master Plan Update. Provided the update is ultimately adopted, staff will use the updated Central Park Master Plan to apply for funding as it may become available. COUNCIL COAL ADDRESSED: This item addressed the City Council Goal of PARKS AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT, specifically, to conduct the public input process for a new Central Park Master Plan. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A- City Council staff report dated February 7, 2018 for the Draft Central Park Master Plan Update (Plan is distributed under separate cover) EC:I_S D1-Pg 1 i STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 2018 TO: Mayer and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Elisa C. Cox, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Central Park Master Plan Update RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the draft Central Park Master Plan Update and direct staff to continue with the necessary environmental studies.. BACKGROUND: In July 2017 the City Council confirmed its direction for the continued vision and purpose for Central Park and directed staff to conduct a robust community engagement process. Staff along with RJM Design Group, Inc., the architects of record for Central Park and original Central Park Master Plan architects, led the Central Park Master Plan Update process in three phases: • Phase I (June — September 2017) — Historical Summary / Background Research. This included a Staff Study Session,; Commission / Council Study Session, City Project Team meeting and Community'Workshop I. • Phase Il (July — October 2017) — Update of Existing Conditions. The site has undergone many natural and manmade changes since the last Master Plan was completed. This phase gathered much needed data on existing land conditions„ future surrounding development plans and existing utilities.. • Phase III (September 2017—February 2018)—Master Plan Review and Park Concept Refinement. This phase compiled all data and input received duflng Phases I and Il. It also included the development of an online web survey to solicit responses from community members, two Community Workshops and the draft Master Plan Update now being presented to City Counciil for consideration. ANALYSIS: The draft Central Park Master Plan Update its an extensive document which includes the detail's of the City's community outreach. Multiple methods were employed to maximize the community input. Online surveys, community workshops„ and a live Facebook broadcast event were held to solicit community feedback on the development of the Central Park Master Plan, Residents actively participated in over 2,500 instances, and the Facebook broadcast reached almost 19,500 viewers. EXHIBIT A D1—Pg 2 Central Park Master Plan Update February 7, 2018 Throughout the process, program and park elements were recorded in each of the outreach tools. This input served as the basis for the revised site plan. The facilities and programs that rose to the top include: Top Active Facilities: Top Passive Facilities: Top Programs: • Multi-Purpose Facility • Amphitheater • All-Inclusive Programs • Recreational Pool • Demonstration Gardens • City-Wide Events • Tennis Courts Vineyards • Community Garden • Dog Park • Concerts in the Park • Open Space/ Nature Area Farmers Market/Stand • Picnic Shelter Maintenance/Operational • Playground Shade Funding • Shade • Picnics • Walking/ Running Path Trails The draft Master Plan Update proposes adding the new elements to the Park through phases, so the City can build a phase once it has the funding to both construct and properly operate and maintain the new elements. The implementation of the "smaller 3 to 10-acre parcels" will allow the City flexibility to develop portions of the park as funds become available.The appendix includes estimated construction and ongoing maintenance cost which will assist in determining which phases to build over the next ten to twenty years. Major changes to the previous Master Plan: New elements to the Master Plan: • Relocated/Larger Amphitheater • Viticulture Pavilion (grape vine • Reduction of Large Parking Lots preservation) • Removal / Reduction of Family Aquatics • Universal Accessible Playground Center Adventure Area • Removal of Large Lakes Recreation Pool • Removal of Fire Station (Built Elsewhere) • Dog Park • Water Treatment and Bioswale Facilities Should the City Council approve this draft Central Park Master Plan Update, the staff will begin the necessary environmental reviews, which are anticipated to take up to a year. After the environmental reviews are complete, the full master plan will be brought back to the City Council for consideration of final adoption. FISCAL IMPACT: The update for the Central Park Master Plan was approved in the FY17-18 budget. However, there is currently no funding to build any projects identified during the Master Plan Update. Provided the update is ultimately adopted, staff will use the updated Central Park Master Plan to apply for funding as it may become available. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addressed the City Council Goal of PARKS AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT, specifically, to conduct the public input process for a new Central Park Master Plan. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Draft Central Park Master Plan Update D1—Pg 3 Central Park Master Plan Update January 29, 2018 D1-Pg 4 „5� ,� h fraxroa �r¢•, � �� r ONE LO, zI MME - a mom r m l � Vl o r j, d i�f i k f r a, � ” r , l r t I N J—F co CZ 01) ONEW ' un W H v� m,Inm T U .U. U] -o U � o � a oc • O O O C cd Q, H O U R 75 E A E y C Q a O � O U y cd ID G ca O wm. j cd V-. U .— •.� n s. �'' c5 rn ° A lul cd Cd 71 0 Vj O P, '� o �• � ¢ � c a,�' `� v � a' j cid°' ° M q � C u � O O O wL U Cy F~'r U N 'O ti O a>i 0 , 1 �7 ° m 0 y • • • • • • • • • • • • Ell E Irdooka Z INERVI <', -x cu r Jd C .' bGy Nbq I I v 00■�� O � O � � � y O � .� F� R, y 5 O a t y y y y z M■■E 8 ° U � lm,om _ V W o O �" a C13cz bn P w ri Cd ° y U ]." 1 Q a ca y W c o K2 A Y _y ap• b o w U cz o c ° C.) cd c> E uu o o • o y v y �" '� a y ° o y � p R �. cOC .� y v' cys G N � " > U � y •� .1 v' O •N O � ��r 'q cyC N Y U to t10O., o U E5 m y y cC O p ° O 'G I. E O cc �' Y y ¢� U Oy SO i7 ai O o ,� 3 2 O cG a a) C :� U ll N N Sv." mss. N'b O y y ° �, a O O 72 ° y NO cC ^C �' � .L � � � ° r O A. c3 ll O O :G .may. y O Cc?, G' Q :n _ y .? O cc :� n y bq bA b y y cy CC, y p O O O �/ cyC L' � y `n U � � Q, � N �. s°. � •� p � � U � o ,"fOr '?i -C y �j � 9, v� o 'er ° c a E� o ° H any i' a4 a. o U w b S? y x y y a �, y y gIL w° p Inc hal U .° > oo y y a? v y y y w o w y oobo zCc, o a 1,75' Y a o F x o `a . +-. m N u "O Cjm ami Pa N Y :� by N N I/y 0 1 > ° a° y o H o F a 3 a a o Q o w m o. 0 u, q n,d 2 F- C.�- u, N d o a r H . rn Ell E Irdooka Z INERVI <', -x cu Jd ■�� N �i � aJ O .y G. Q� LLr � �., � � � r ONE ILI a � L o \■�� V1 Cd U v: y�y U ZO C-1 • U 0-4 > a c x � a cz 73 U H c o O H x 0 Y U £ Q ca U r� w � � � O U o � � a oIs. Cd U c3 W � � -� ori ct o P CU c3 O � F•G� O C CZ rl Cr U •� '« � O w a law— E 0 o 3: a= c LA pp E= o 0 w , - . w M . �m 0 0 7; =6 0 V 0 o b 0- 0- . . - I- 2 �g -0 0 0 CL 0 B > o:L - w 0 0 -2. > -0 8-6 - 2 2 E o > R 0 -10, -0 o :i .4, z 41 OK V) :5 E �E c u .. 0 2 112 ru = - -- 0. 22 0 M> E 0.!L, - 0-- 2 W -. m> C� 'E 3�<, . m w - . �=-, �o o -2 o w .................. _ �2 2 L 0 E E 0 E u Lo . -R m �3 n cc t� '40 o 0.- .0 QZUZQJ 0 0 04 f Nt w U a' u o 2 E .0- T Oz t5 I u 2 I,IIIry l01 CJ' 01 E o U. o E >-o C. WE 101- < 0 o 0v oa CL N 0 o 0 m 0 . wm'0 0 c 0 E E- as - o U V 5 -0 CL E E w W MX I' -0 m cc OLS., �o 0 -0 E w c W, O-S co w 0 o -Ell O 6- W--W O 0 0 c ............... --.6 U, E 87 w - -�2 �c ;2 2 5 >0 -�E a 0� , w -0 2 6 -w E E U 0 v vv 2-2 2 > o .2 > a > ;6 M 0 K > C E- -E u i -6 E� .......... 4 0 0 2 ov E E -0 &lie E 0 4 V,E L «v10 -0 J E E MWF 0 E Laa E ------ Immumv IMF------------------------- E 4 E 2 0� u. 'o m�xEw11 •11 c Ea >0 E -E 0 Ati all 00 E 0 os £ u u > 2- E Illmllll E E E A, 0. E E ' 0 u E T 0 E 2 fu 0 E 2 5,2 IVuI -2 > aE .............. T- 0, aE 10o-0 00 HHUH '0 0 4 E, Ro co Jd ONE C U U Y U -C a cz C G. V � W y w o � o y w M0 0 3 U � O U U U � � SC F' U N U � O ti U 4 N O M O �O O O OC) V)cd 00 Vl V'1 �O Vl O Q O > C7 � n � N O cn 01 O N NO N csd •U N O � s. :r ,�ti V ^ 9 d O w v p N � C o ISI y 3 W O a H .y G NOME El F3 co p V i3' U U 6. 7. O q y N ❑ o v NONE a s OQ 872 2 (� L ° � F'i L •• U i � 11 ^ c iv G 'o .IL �I Q El 76o °: c a .y P a )P Z cn.o a U 'b a°�i.� � � � o U >. r v o a O L/1 s F o o E 0 0 ° a; oEa q so. 4 � vo� �oaiJoy yY � � xa pv � U2 � f ' E 0. _ x � o° " ?.o C, O•o U El a oEi v :, 81 O U O'w cda m 10 ol s, t •�°-,�. N OCL Gq W W a CJ Y a O CJ CL Ar oc FJ 'r 'v r C--L) P. p,.Y C >, c�= _ 3 y 0 8 ° Q or ^S 3 0 i- v � a -a UL) (3 cy U o ppU .. O '6 U ✓"' S." dq cG aJ N cC b � G' bq F"r � y Jd ONE MOOM M O w o ? P w y oA U y � cca� U � m ct O � o o � � °J o U � �w Tom, 0 � o� � � U � o �y y� oy o � � o U U � O U � O U � U aoo � 72 c3 � U (sleog uaplep aa;e ry alpped'PU142APA'8ul—D a '8ulyslj)A]!n!1PV 1a;eM aa4ua7 Allunwwo]Aaepuoaa ry Ileal/geed 8uluuna dlgsaaulaed P41A11d/allgnd x ■■■■x'. ■■■■ 3 LO /8ul%IIeM x 1nawdl,b3 spaaN lepatls z■■■■¢ r /;uawdlnb3 punojOAeld x U■■■■a p —W"/speaH Ilell v uapaep aaelial saluald aSll.l5 x 0I1ed ay;ul a;eadsaryey5) [{ 0 r a';eagl...p;no slaued IPI-S 8ulw, Q joop;np apeg5 H A;aj,S/A;u—S 8u!pund Q uolle�ad ue p/aa ualule�l I--� 8m,ppng woo.i;saa x pue15/;.IllPW—.1ed x sn slue;nelsaa x E FT's z uapse9 ua;aalyaa u-!I!ned asp�ax3 x pLi 7J Q ;ldailgnd asinoH asryaxd rT�� 1tf—I Q apegs puno38APld + ja;uaD uoildop W 'Vl U /-IV Aeld 800 xPla,PUP ua,olsaaPld � 1-41-4S eluP!d o0 >ped ayl ul s;laauod —Vu-l;e—Pa -11-d a uaple9 Almnww-3 I x Hulsll Pd v 11-3 aplmAL,3 uolllned /aaedS/ea3V;uaA33--pinp " Ted NP U!UJ 7 Q E lied s1JPl7 pue SlJ N pn1PN y\�' /—v—i,N/aaedS-do x .11-b Hu,In.]) wel8o;d anlsnloul-II x , J wnasnW p1eA/ea;tl/aaueua;ulRA N o ,ned aplsayel F 3�Y y y Y /� SI-1 poi L m LL > > > ;a;IaeW—."j ,r � E E E E _LL O O salgel aluald/aluald Allwe3 a o' N E E E LL we;uno38ulluup ry C _ O O O V V V eaaV aa]eM 800 v E o iced Bop x eaaV ya1nW Bop as P,aal BUu(j W G spaeAaull\ 7j T 1 /suapsep u-Ne�lsu-wap x �,/ r ,uald aleaotla.D w uapep A;i,unwwoD x = U P!Rsan b3/slleil al P!jg Ileg anog Bled ailg C Q sayauag U � Aj PlAV ti W U G ea;1S Aa0'swea115 � � "a �' r� C73 'sAera3a;eM'sade;'snilenby � U � � � � � � ]aleayllytlwV x (ls!W APAS/PPd gs PldS) al ao "' s-4ead3a4eM " v py U u U ePld IPsenlun x 1-11-1 q -D slPPa1 splay/ja;uaD sliodS ti samlead duileslS sddo/asap-o -D-3/—.;id/sad-a x x x m loud P-nea,aaa x x x x x x x ,,,. � Qlaupwanap � ;b E di s;au;e-oa;enl n c (w OS)loud uo al;adw-D /1--d idwAlp C� U f= y a aedS;uan3...pul x ? � '�5 wAp • x Sy' O 0. CA la;ua7 sP 11enbV Alm e3 il-9 aalua]A;lunwwoo . • . . • • . . s;an-D Il eglaiseg sPlald Ileg a sgl/Aeld /�ledawaaan;uanpV x a � 1--d AIIA141V Y c p J= 333 >° > E E X ` 00` — E E E U U E U U U E Z Jd co /) ONEO 'n ISI Q N a .3 w' 2 lu o Q r v� d vz o a NONEv u E O 'A mon U ? ci w o a� c czp W C O0 HI H � Li cl� is °� H � ..�'• °: � Ucu U •V bpA r O y ca o � � •� cn .� o m . � q a+ � CU 4C o � � U 7� m cz 0 y aq cu m 44 � '� O ¢+•j • w N R1� � o o > x p Q a� siNanv Na7,n�,w NOME m ■■o s �_ jNONE i_ p� 1r ' cn x a ( a Z r _ i 0 L) 4 x z � '✓ III/J i x 1 Q /III l x 1 z � zs Gy x "N .SFR r�G1! llVll�e��f�f �� ZZ Irl O ii� UI W j ✓`�J �� Z� yp" I Y" I V N -dam �x N Jd 00 «.' ■��■� r h � T �/ y y W y ONE CIO MO OM pcz - U y o z x a U d O v y . 0 0 cd ;5 c: U +' U 3 r 7A �0. p cC 'O v y ^— vLm O U p p O U cC O y � Y c13 O p O 'AAV NHNITHN NEW i jQ W O w i o� a � �� i ' ' kid✓,�,/'�y ,. , 44Gy ))1 �� '' —I I p ty til I ii i ear , S oc ri I IU Q ,�. ✓�� u.� r ', � I i� r� O Q r 1I m a FY '/ 1 II o INjllV � � o v r ■�� y ° � °' °� � � � � '� .� G- G, 0.r .V � ° •v,Jd N 47, WMOO O bA `.J w xl'! ocz cz � o � o U ... > o � fl ° y y y o � n � C o b3 O U � � U N � X 00 Q, ✓ ,� v� N 00 R > 0. O v V� va c Cq --.{; :11]V lt':1111111YH -. ome ; N -,� (-)m a ME 0) II `,,.� i �; , /iii✓i✓ � �r I MAT a � z 0 HI U ``;�� ✓//////! ip//l// I t I� QI � pN / f✓/�i��/ u�i N /r Iii w u I tb ix I� ,10m W II U VE ��4ry wwm jil I liuutu � Ij Q m✓�� / ® % 1 m�� q r io Q / iilit� % 3 a� ✓iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii c/� w �' g ✓irji i� i✓rQ � I. , dill i �� ✓' i iuZ �� rz ISI i/ � �✓ilii 1i� � �� ?j�✓Z „ ✓�� ''Y 1,14N 7 IL ✓iii //// ISI IL XAm w �` zw 7 J l q i f /✓�/ l7' Q z I^�' H �� ✓ n`",, �/z n ✓ /1 O 00 _ oc IL I Q 7 m 7 / ��I I �O�✓ �'�li,, Y � W W o ri cnrA E E- '*.- i� % a F J! l9 e Q �✓liiiii Q � h Q�, i ��r iii✓ J „o s rias' lil l°�Qjll O Y z w w r Jd ONEy Ov cq5Q T oo "✓ W � o p cz y on � � •� U ? o. w U y y ti y 'o y � o yN Ij o�n cl: o o o. z Ija C4y 0 0 ml b y aoi = Fes- ^ ~ d Y y CJ 7d =O CQ y vi p y y y y y 8 y o a � Y cd W ca ° - 0. 5 ID U y w Ei o o 3 y U 2 z ° a bona ID W O •N y '� O. O ,.�.' d 04 'O 'O O ccs ? ID 0.r rz � y -- ---'° �AF�NII I IIY�i -�, ■■■■Rome M ■■■■as 11611 U ��I I `I,• III � I i � w �a I r I z I � z (Y(HAz ._1 0 li'j Q IN i 114� C7 lik- V 0 1 Q W �� I Illill i ��41 I III 4., U ilii � W IIS II. �o`l � li l l l' AHI 11 I 1111�f O � I II a p W I I I r H I q p Q oc Otto I I I 4 O O 0 N � I jlll a I � �rrrrrr� h o "9AV Ng'XI'I-11W - - — — — — — ■os■x b zRome N I NONE a t I CIO o � I W LI r ,r y H Z c o m 44 W I � I 0 � I q � F W w It �_ x z II Iii O U t��l � lluulouuuuuuu I I� iii r � � „ III 0 ill I I Ali JI� a O � „ i I if o qmoc Z w N a O N J \ \ I I � Y �r_ r ry 11 v ,✓r " ■■� o N LO -)m �E■O a � Z O I � ¢ III J)IIQ(� ✓� � lr I I W � I I II. � 10 i Pi y)I I IIy f1➢ to I IIIc � HI 4 Z 0 I dill N II Ili L ry O J W rzi o I Q' c. v 0 O ri u2`�� t� �"�✓ I II �: a o I qI Jd co 5 j 3 C14 ■�� -' '�'' y 0-, a� ��, t Ll, 0.r . bA •� ~i`�', .c' z I MME gyp u } OO ,cam,' U y cz � o a c � o Y U ° bCl y n 75 H 4C� No U � U U .Ur iC •p O o cut ° OO U Ri OU 70-: U c-) N X, ° O y 6' y '" ' ca SLOB• '3 O . U ~ U / cC ° y' ,shy O U '� � V1 'O � P- � vOi •� .C, O � � cC WF5 rl °U Li N U U � ct IIIIIIIIIIII�AR�4flPI01 fIIIIIII W�II III YIIIIIIIII II II J IIIIIIWN'�m➢IIIIN IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIII Illll...a"lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll,IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIOtl00IIIII MIIIIII IIIIOIIIIIIIIIIII iII IIIIIIl00001 IIIIIIIDIullllllll lu y x0llllllllllllllllllu llllllilil uumwuuilNlD»wl.nrr+�»r,,,�„uuuuuuuuuuuuuu�us�u,»mun”m„rrwmuuuuuu„rr;»,,m,,,,maraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaN�rulmuuuuuumrnnnnm,ID,m,msmsnu»D1»u' �k��llrlillllllllllluuuu �� r " IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII uuunnnnnllllllllllllll�ll�lou�llllullllllllfrrlluull r nlllllllllllllllllllllllll�llllllllllll Ri■■IA u ouuuuuuuuuuuum uuuuuuuuuuuuum o uul�umuuuuunnno uuuumuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum��irfrmuuum IVIV1Y1YlYuuuuiiu uuuuuuul�um uu u p MOEN olllliilllllllli I �_ Illiillllllollllllllllll unNillU SNONE uuuuuu � I I >ss WIS IIpI rorr tl Nry„ /�� uuuumuuuuuuu�noouuuuuuuum luau j/] I t t uuupuaPua�Onnnlllmul � � ,.v r I•-� l U �, j I I� mr — � nnnmuuuuu �•J I—i D d cry I i % x NNNN"° r/�of WT^ x \ W D71P Vl �,�a�f4aq rr J v w 9�� III � tl► �`�&w peuwx „,��wp"n aa�/r/app%nAODUipi%riiiiilimliinfmiiG��„ Z `� 7w7 ly I bl, G i .: Y ca r °1� ��'II II hlf x H - it I S I✓ a � i� � x Z 1 O v x _ I i r1 �D r Ilml�mvi f PW. W U d Z UC7W rNN' I �\ f s d✓fir �`I� pI — oDnrd%,�O za 3 o zW ' a ail i{l y'�� oox f �r N IIIIIIHIIIIIId�%NIIIIIII�IIWMIIIIII i Illllulllu Ill lkllllllu�llllll�llllll�llllll IIIIIII IIIIWI R3.6",-tlIYIII'M«IIIYnIIIII*tlINNWIIIllSII)i ulllll w IIW#-nllllll MIIII MIIII nnIIII ARRi—VIII IIIIIII IIIIIIIJIIIIII WNtl IGIIu u0ll WM nlI Ml0 MW WII >. «rr null IIII x ■■■■ N 00 IIII V� w■■■■¢= TI IIII �_„I I III, IIII J■■■■a s 0) IIIIII � jj Ilii �� fir�� IIII ry` VIII Q'i IIn , n VIII of ii �6 GI;. I � H U IL W Z m, I SII R! O Ai ` 4I %v�� IIII W Q� uJ� /p " uull �.W" d'Z 'o ��, I Pr ✓«- Q w 4" LT, 41" I U LJ W �j U III, I 11:T41 —4 U rr . � I III II E�� ii ✓�`+ '[�"—I 'T' CY Q r a�� f j F r—) O � � OZ u L) � � � W I Iy lllllili " m' \\\✓/� Y� VIII W h L ry 1.4 �I I I Illi — l II I= INN 111 �� I � i / IIII II I IIII "�c _ I II/ IVIIIm�, III �,y i it �� ji r� IIII II IIQII IIIIIIIIIIIIII�I;'ril�/�r� r«�o�ml�PoniiPii '9AV Ng'XI'I'IIW doll l umluuq I jjjj)im„vw»uuiu luau 006 moo mu ug0u1y61 uuw m uuu ww mw�w,�.lw uum u0uLj uum wmi omLwfi w»»-uwu 0uu-0imuw uuu�uuuwuulj low_-nub o N,uum fueN,uuur ■y�■u=: ouuuuuuuu.....I H IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII VIII uuuNNY uuuuu nuuaaauuur,uuuuu uunuuuuuuuuu mmumum uuuuum upuuuuuuuu uuuuauuuol uouuuuurvaooi uuuuuuuum uuuuuuuum uuuuuuuum uuuuuuuu uuuuuuuum uuuuuouuuu aiiuuuuuum uuuuuuuum uuuuuuuum uuuuuuuum uuuuuuuum:uuuuuuuum uuuuumnmr mmmmmmr ,6'e'..... z II■■� w�■■�¢o N � I4 U■ON■a6 0) if I -'� �6, '�� ,'�„ � • 111111 '. � �. Q � � I I � � \� �u�- 0a`"" � ��ow uuumommu uuuuuuuum uuuuumou� I I d wwu�mhol0uuvn � !�] ' W � NNbNIwJWYLl6` �� op, ' IIIIIII ^� r �w W U � n'IW� IIIIII I--m r N ul oON� —�� I � NN�II j - aNr ar � 0P0VIi��pG IIIIII� W Irl � rrI I�� 04 Q P 10 Ilk II Iltllw �� I jl�li'lII IIi� i I IIIIII li I �� I I Ililii� I IIII �� I I ;, IIIIII l rIM III III III r,, o . III ([ d11 Iu / � ® IIIIII IIII I I lillil �""Go °N i II li �1 � Illw , v II VI Ills W f� l IIII U� Z III J( Q-I ��I I V H� 00 II II Ij,1� U x�x II � IIII, RW�i III a� I UD Q it co ww � � it ��` z wa 41 II JI W W ITJ I o o� ao VIII two— W W oc IIIaQ �� wU C 0 OO �, r I Z uh��&ri0m0ouuulua In!uurol II wghuomuuym„mmm uua�uu we VA Q ui Q 4 ka W L1r W r� wO'„ Ou VIII VIII ri rA �� VIII o N 'j 7 �� izr� VIII m l,:..,�w�� \jlN. mk,;0n, "01IIIL I o !wrc�0, ,ter ��m��O IIII II ;AI I�I�' tzar IIII m •--� a` m l� m v� In -- m In l� N Jd ... �.. ..... �..... O V �' V bfi �' ,�+- .2 M ■ate■ ^ .� ° WEEN � U U z MEM U 3 w = o ��m o bA V 5 cOC °, 2 2 4y cC 2 O LL F � o � CD cC V � N y > t ani y o z 7s a FSI _ C V '^ P. Cd 'rn R OC q O bq a' V U a G O Cp V I a GV ..�. wr J Fir "'I�," ` y � + �—� �— —.Y .:..,:2Y.,'� ;u',, �"^�^r� TMs^- „. ",.." """ `� 'a■■■■u . Im U■■EEOij�r p ja — FVt Po r ,1 I i t t'"," ,Yr re ,,`%u ^.1r ldY' . �rT;" I I, Ia `� ��I ( '� '"y ,a� e, d ( I �,M:, ✓ti d r ;J Vry " r " � ! Ei s �Y � , a, (,a ': ✓' yY ry t s 'Y. Cr r X", Ilir; ,�� yyXX�� w i �WC � YI III Igl Illil r li �i QIP w i r^ � f'I �ili�ii eI I a r IN4'I it u i I F I e � f li I Iai r )ID II i/ i 0 "7 v ,� . �I;KR�� ,,� •"'. 1 Y I1 �%� �s J � I avv N Imo, U NONE a ¢LL � j ( I I cn Z z �� I I III III I��✓ �, � O i 1 I II �I III j do I I � ��I II I ✓i/�� sir �I�� , e,r IIII � YII \ I o r di IA ✓ �il � / � f I h , �r �Y �I � ill i ✓f � �� v�� , i . �, li I ill � I^ li I /� j '�` • a � it � II, i j11 / � � �� ) /i✓ ��' � I � Ili�i� w I �� ' ✓ 1 , i II i, Ca PI - �v I ✓ I � I�� 'vv / � �� ✓I � III" IFI- V Con � 00v " � � � `.: ✓f� Imo` W � Ll r s � �JlI ..._. c LL ■■w~a zE F.- LU O aw �es,x 4 A ✓ ,Y Y�a'Y10 y � � I. /�l /�� i � d G �� yy'' � � ^, r ✓/%''�,,. � /� I fad `/ ,�,o�I(// ,5' � J fv e. 'p�rj,�� 71JI 1 fOf Y .,G Y � ! bW b W D 4 d 'i"; �kaF�.:. ��ya�At ar:::° ��..�M. 5"r wip,i,a�6�,�/�4�• �r,�l�y....v r,p� Ln 1 & 9 N u �4 I / ��/,,✓, d � I a��3�,K" r:s�� :��ul c� �� arr � ��ry oc `,�� e � q x r �a r ��^�. y fa �b I ups// »t i b uS�'"• ,� o 4 1!y "x,R Y V d 5 o,✓/�y SII Y, ill p� /d J tl u,y y N r irA S. G'G"9 �5,_l p a _A 6S Ytl i 4% VVfa. n /1 �� II w 2 " g5j�n n y bwaxJ', a a orf oc� VI rA N M .�-i .�-i •--� V1 M M N a ^ M V1 r-- ■�� °' �' y °� o 'vc73 ONEU U i z MINE We O -. ~' C `✓ `.J NONE■Ow � � obA W U o O U U � a a d' z a w x a co N .U- t� N F"' cp cd p IL N o o o ° scup U U t1b o o U O U U U O ,�] M o 'AAV NAxT-1-11w OEM ■■■■ �n z OMEN ■■■■a L- � If r^7 � z Z ° 7T I �Q v � �;'\ Ij IL r k � I 4 0 w r I cn MIT Q 00 a 1011, iiia r, N jll M m v■■zoo NO ■■a p z W za O 00 / . := o zio0m � _ m� mo � mo m � V Q z a u � u u l / o ry N a v v v v m o ,n E 0 a a c ti 1O z z z z V Q - / o _ o v o = Q LL c c c c Co 6 mo o m v a o z o � Z Z Z Z 0 0 0 j V F C7 U / 3 a v - etgz z i' i awe r- CV) So m IX Z cu bm m �n h �n Q` M l� m v) m ^ M V1 r-- Jd 1-1 C113 I lM I p ¢' 000 ONE Z �■■� 3 W F v� d a" ° vz o a NONE o a W A� d U A z a 0 p O GA � ¢' O U � � o � w � _ L7 i Zou3 � bA o0 CL CL o •o o � '� y � y � O O L o cu H I W F' cOC '21AVNINI'V11W MEN 4 I NONE In.i a, rr 44 ZO U W ^ Vr 1 I o p r it f LIJ k ii i( ED El U U 0 w. P4 P-i W W R X q, 4 III — P400 fg ill II I { aP4 VJ o N i W F W H W rn N s i 11mo r rn M E C-)NONE a i 0) 10 u a ea z i R, M'49 1'to z LU xm E 0 5 E 16 6 21 U z I- ig B W Ly 81� LL LL= (L) ,�0 U) 0 O Lo rn o ox x r-o o O LO 1-: O LLI C N:E x x x x 0 0 0 p E mc .R C11 LU .2 E a Q tD Ix 'T< 04 ol LU w co x x x x IL In m'o 00 N N 0- N CL E E E cn (D 0 " dd LLJ .0 r 0 O 4) m 0 .4) .0 CL 0 4) 2 M IL 0 E 0 0 0 �p V E o LU E & a 3 0 ) cc jll 0 O U@ O@ co C7 u G1 ay R c L) <—LL 13 0 j- LLJcn m 0 R04 C 0 > U) -6 � ci z Rome NONE IL *k 10 0 a C6 26 vd Z c uj E M.L. 8--.6 F t-i z ig uj z EE L ui T5 04 .2 45 ' < -F m 76 U- U- Q) U) 0 (0 LO 0, '0 x x rn 00 O a':E x x x x O E E E cli LLJ C .2 O. E LU U) x x x x IL <D 00 N N 0- 4 II II II II II N CL E E E Q Q ri 0 O 0 0 2 E 0 , ) CL 0 0 —M(L + 0 CL E 0 0 M 0 E LU m EP mm 3: 0 0 46 0 o 06 c ;F E�320 r .0 m = 0 0 U) w(D u L L—i E L) L) l y LL 0 j- LU a m 0 r R IL o > m •--� a` m r t� m v� t� l-- Jd C� U YONE ■�� p Z � � Y � � v � � ay � r MOOMw � � � � o � � aon � � •a��n Z � o, w r� U 1,11 ot- -2 t 0-0 O W U U y aq p ' N p O .s; 0 N U ro pr U p ami O U 7= � O U y U c O Nrn U O N c�C cUC v U U b1J O iUr cU3 s•. � O W 'O "I ti 44 R C n - - - - - - - Z Iiia ^ pv,�� y 11 � �``I�i✓ /ilii"-. � I � �„I U tu ly O FC r� IZ .y/ tt��0�//rrrrrrrr Q lo F- 1 Z � a� I I�I I p[In� �`✓r �� /iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii/iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiirii 3 w w m �' ✓ V_W U/ 0 �<W01 � I III F y I Ifs mZ I I,z TV r I J I I III rill✓ /iifiiiiiiiiiiii/ii /ilii/ ✓ I p W ✓�� tt u a rill Vii/ y I �11 a wodrr i �z�,W , VW�� + Orja� w �V:• IN, zj (i l� Z C7 oc IIF� a`;/ a Q'w�Q i lir IL i ,/, //r�✓,i��" ,_ � J '� 'rte JU N r. d OC MR � I "Z' i aus�� u \ I r " I oc a � N x A O O o 0o y� NOME ■OI■as p z n. 71 v U L w0 O O O 0. O ¢ ❑ x N '6 N v •B v v 'O ~ r r N Q F E o o C o o a v 3 U C7 .a a, o ,� a, o .a .° O O 5 0. 'm z ayi a`i y oo-° 'n v � x c C4) v a a O z rr- � ..' •� > .• m ti o is m y $ns m y c E U ° �. y c p LLS CL P S CL $n. S CC d E ¢ O v v cJ I cn tv N a x v nU S cn > m en 5 c c a v > ° axs. ti � •d � ori � Fsi 6. m � y M � c a � c a � � a °' °' °' •a a `" � sem. � V) C N U ¢l 7' 00 O U O y o 'y El p o o ami o o ami o o v 9 9 °�p4, N = a _ c a v > A v A S > E rte, E y A ^6 y A o a� o ti v o ti v o ti v a z z V ¢,w cL CG ❑ Z CG ❑ Z CC ❑ Z ;t ;� Sl,V) Z 0] Lr1 N �n W U "O V1 c, a a 0 00 00 � � ¢ d 0. F F E X O 0. Z � C � o d 0. a. F O O D U ro F C C m m c N u. s, o A � O v 0. O O � EIS E O U bD N (� y T y CL N U "oUO O L � r v m O �i CL c°a N 3 0 ' CL =) ❑ Q -y O- CL Z .ti LO So m IX ZI . cu r .Jd co y F"`�v+l ■�� 'x N N Q^ ~ G- P. 0, ONE x ■� } �� \1 x 00 u 7� U o, � o tict a 73 � 'v C to O � Y O~ O J 0 3 � N � � o a� pp y 5 U 4--� N CL y0 U N = cd C3 v t) cd Q y � � y > d 'M o o o w <� 4�1 U L . . p ,L' U � pU rn 'rte' dD O ,U, ,.�. Ru bh V y o a W u j to75 ami °J ca w o c 7d 'm p ci CC, . H w' � C � 9 � � PN �� _ • 'FIAV NaNIZ-11W ■■■■ 4 v■■■■a p je � j I• il.�� W w Q� 10 HI / 1 W ul llll I �� I c �^ T�' iii •�4 ��• " i � � � I - i 1111111 ',� I i i i o��i A„I U O 77 U �p lillllllllllllll � � I III iia Num', n _ IIIIIIIIII l 1111111 �� I' � �I�I�I� I` f li h z iI w l 11 e. o ii I iii Irl epi r m mm li il� iu h , � r IIIIIII �,li Iii O 'I l � 'i� I rr IIIIIIII ill,,, , . O I I li IIIIIIIIII � m uol II i q li I I I I i lY I I II i _ o oc ��Il�w rn� 00 O I v■■■■a s pllllll o fJ y� I II III*. I W w ¢� Q � 'a IIII 1jILI �� —l v I H 1q, l�lL H1 lur II I ili, � w I I I q 00 � Ilhi� W �I I I i I I II .I I �I �"V, d0 � Illr I II hl au it l III o II � III li l II Il i � I r , i' I ' I �` `IIS � o 121Laid I - oc o ; III N jll v�yry , / —_ ? Rome F M. v■■■■a a I � � Q o ( � O CA ml �4 li V) 7r uY C) LO � C4 I�jl > Z) 414MAN 40(4m o www 'IT 12, O CII rl) 'IT -r) 1.0 r— co Cl r1l rl) Z Mo uY w.■■ ■¢'; LO W Q� E<6 0 Ism � Q x v z m �nwrn�Mu�.wrn�Mu�aq'I�WVWIV�INV rt a,�a ]�'rrrr✓,arrr�i�xr✓,arrrr�xe�xr✓,arrrr�xe�xr✓,rrr, 8,� � U �dlll u� q„ v � ti _Na �IIIIoa,S F , 0 4 4 a5 �i �w�rr�y�n F � ,nieineineineinrrinrrinrrinrrinY�i„ w-R-`w d' t O rte, p �. 1111111 IV�VVIIII� c �j " d., j� � au�irrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr � IOIpODD� 1�1" UJliillJ/f 7r M .fir .fir •--� � Q\ M � r M � � r Jd C/) L v, N •� Z •� ('1 W �, � a; o�n Cj •� U r/� o, w ONE J5 x u w o H a U x U W A� d U A z a U � � N OC N ° -0N � V U U N CC N '� ..a � ,U°• Nom" a) y c�C �'"' � -G � � U rn � P. cC p .,U, W U L FE - -o 2 .� 0 � ' - E 2 o cUi cLi o G O ami fl p ° a i a, oEz � � y U p � �' •C Qa � '� u � � Q 'a � F�-� P- •�,�' � � � SME- � L�`J '3U .� Y � z u : Lo 3 n d U z Rome ■OI■a p Q a W r/1 w Q up a � o Z o � o F � Q Fsi F w w o w U w F .; w W fir_ w �gwmrNrw,mPZ LTJ z w O O O " ,�I '�' 1.1 ✓S o , , , / r/�� i rs OcA d risifiiisRjF% fl / Jr! �� rA � 1y �v � ,/ % y, P�1 o / r % U Sas s;1jll w / yJ ii s fj r /o/l/lJJJJJ/I ,��Ji 'lir � u'. J O W >-' ■■■■¢ w F O F ■■ v ■■a p. 64 Z haw o W W U haw coZ 64 S^a vn w w Lz W Vl a Q 771. w � v w w z x Q a F W C rW o W o LTJ 9x 10 w Q id W a+ w LTJ 11 IV� w F a cL W C U w I c4 m w d f U w W Q CIO w D � 's] LTJ V U J W ✓� r l/�r `3 '�ir r'� � a "err ��A �y i�� 2 ✓ rAI O !r ✓nrtr / I %� �. Ca cWn ��rii`�riili� yi�io liar r1Jy �,r° fir. /�" 111 W U r�¢ce�ur rrr r W L4 W � u; o L7 ¢ U pRiie Lo ONE a d z � 3 Q ° x W Qu r QID Z z vi w z a w w z U U z � F w 1p w y� Q Grp� i 6 r�'r�rla�,�rrirraonrrr N��/ � rp ori rrr// O r r �ir/��j r ioio y� y r1 r �'� P ��(i r ........... ��wl coo r^ o x x a d ■■■■x a a ■■■■ co z RomeLo j■m■■ tWi, W U z V' z up off/ cj U w Q plIllf'!Jankamll cG rr I4 l,ll r�i t, f(/s rl�l r, Jr , 'r/ / / Jr/J �l /l m CIO da aor l r a o m✓ iii//t/v Iz a � �,Srxrrfl/ ��%�%�/Illi '� c�t�!j/ /�'% ✓ '« �.%F U Y k hr O, r- LO So m I . IX Z cu bm M l� V1 M M In M ^ M Vl r-- Jd bA N 00 1,10 cj LO ■��ONE � �-' � � `..L�i � � 0-� U Q, O ,y G- P-i 0.r � � •U � � •� � I■■E MOOM Eou J5, a a � F•I � z w H 0 a v � � U � o � x � w c o cs cd A•I c � WU N sUr A w O 1 U � U Y C ° U .y fir' i�l x v, a> � g-2 'u, W '�: F. on ° ° �I P. o 4 I I`"�� I r �� ✓/ �✓` �I�I, L W Qi U z Rome NONE H c� Zz w 1YPa lj� I � � I"l H z ' W � IN ii J I li�il etu � ui ;I %f�f��/ �0 ill, Q_ Ili I / I � � N za I' Ian n \ I ilr Al" y Jd co ■�� ,,,,/I �'' � � �"' � � � v Qom' .�' G- ONE —1 N " ISI i zMEM _ 3 � W 0 � � as d � � � U �' r ,t 00 y a w W o � U � � o � o O N � w U Ty c y o 0 y y � � y U to to w y � o y � ISI s H y y to o y � o U o ° a QMEN T MEN o a o z amino¢ co NONE as a O T d O rA I O v � � 7 � w i J ce y G U 'f � O. O, W 411, I IVI jlll lad o� II i ioo llllllllllllll zt y a i,• yY ��Iii a 's ■��■x_, CD o w v NONE a s x W zr Q- - t moo c 'A �Z d ti Q zz Id T � o Q, Qb V y Lo) t o � SC7W waw 0 0 IE Jh, A v o u o Q a P. q _ o Iz i i i 4, f s� O C7 d N I r, ,� Ln Lo W Ccniminityinspircd,S;aces q pr DESIGN RJ M GROUP CENTRALPARK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION BUDGET 1/25/18 1. This opinion of probable construction budget is separated into the potential phases of improvements. Central Park Drive West is identified as a separate phase for the backbone infrastructure to include the main roadway and utility infrastructure required to provide access and utility services to each phase of construction. Since the sequence of the improvements is unknown at this time,all utilities are contained within each phase line to avoid duplication of utility services,however under Phase L-Recreation Pool,the fire water improvements;domestic water improvements;electrical power/CATV/Fiber Joint Trench;and gas line are included under Phase K-Multi-Purpose Center. 2. It is assumed a Public Water line will be located in Central Park Drive West with an easement from the Water District. Both Fire Water and Domestic Water line connections will be made from the Public Water line for each potential phase. 3.The primary sewer lateral required for each potential phase requiring sewer is included under the Backbone Infrastructure. An existing main sewer line alignment extends from Spruce Avenue and continues northwest and north adjacent to Deer Creek Channel. All new improvements west of Phase I Senior/Community Center requiring sewer will need to connect to this existing sewer infrastructure,based on the invert elevations at the existing sewer manholes and the proposed grading. The primary sewer lateral will need to be installed with the phase depending on which phase is determined to be implemented first or the sewer infrastructure could be constructed as a separate phase. 4.Interim improvements for temporary erosion control is not included in the costs,as the sequence of phased improvements has not been determined. SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENTS PER PHASE I, BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE $4,306,823.07 II. POTENTIAL PHASING A. PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL- 1.8 Acres $1,709,479.17 B. TERRACED GARDENS-5.2 Acres $2,458,392.99 C. WATER CONSERVATION/DEMONSTRATION GARDEN- 4.4 Acres $2,281,185.27 D. AMPHITHEATER-11 Acres $6,962,413.00 E. UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBLE PLAYGROUND-4.7 $3,750,117.46 F. VINEYARD/VITICULTURE PAVILION-6.7 $4,897,169.68 G. UPPER PARK AND EVENT AREA-2.6 Acres $1,028,018.88 H. EVENT PARKING AREA-4.4 Acres $2,243,260.59 I. ADVENTURE AREA AND PARKING-9.5 Acres $6,366,930.44 J. DOG PARK-4.4 Acres $2,525,190.63 K. MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER-6.4 Acres $9,730,980.19 L. RECREATION POOL-2.7 Acres $6,759,840.84 M. TENNIS COURTS-3.1 Acres $2,615,731.15 N. MAINTENANCE YARD-1.6 Acres $2,678,123.07 O. DEER CREEK CHANNEL TRAIL-4.1 Acres $2,016,123.92 TOTAL FOR ITEMS I-II $62,329,780.36 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget D I—Pg 6af 16 ITEM DESCRIPTION I EST TY I UNIT UNIT PRICE I SUBTOTAL I. BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE CENTRAL PARK DRIVE WEST- PROJECT MAIN ROADWAY AND UTILITIES PRIMARY SEWER LATERAL 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $170,905.68 $170,905.68 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 5,160 LF $10.00 $51,600.00 4. Traffic Control for Utility Connections in Base Line 1 Allow $40,000.00 $40,000.00 4. Erosion Control 94,381 SF $0.25 $23,595.25 5. Clear and Grub 94,381 SF $0.25 $23,595.25 6. Recycled Water 4"Meter with 6"service 2 EA $7,500.00 $15,000.00 7. Backflow,Flow Sensor,Basket Strainer,Master Valve 2 EA $7,500.00 $15,000.00 8. 8"Backbone Public Wate Line with Easement for Fire and 2,880 LF $110.00 $316,800.00 Domestic Water 9. Fire Hydrants(300'o.c.) 8 EA $5,500.00 $44,000.00 10. Fire Line Hot Tap 2 EA $9,000.00 $18,000.00 11. Sewer Improvements-See note 3 above under Item I Back 1 Allow $200,000.00 $200,000.00 Infrastructure 12. Electrical Power/CATV/Fiber Improvements-Joint Trench 1 Allow $750,000.00 $750,000.00 13. Gas Improvements-assumes connection on Base Line Road, 1 Allow $65,000.00 $65,000.00 continuing north in Central Park Drive West,and terminating at Multi-Purpose Center Driveway entrance 14. Rough Grading 94,381 SF $0.75 $70,785.75 15. Site Drainage 94,381 SF $0.50 $47,190.50 16. 3"AC/4"AB(Drives) 62,499 SF $4.20 $262,495.80 17. 6"Vehicular Integral Color Concrete Paving 31,885 SF $15.00 $478,275.00 18. Park Intersection Traffic Calming 1 Allow $105,000.00 $105,000.00 19. 6"Curb&Gutter 5,902 LF $38.00 $224,276.00 20. Roadway Lighting 37 EA $7,500.00 $277,500.00 21. Traffic Signalization at Spruce Street 1 Allow $250,000.00 $250,000.00 22. Signage and striping 1 Allow $100,000.00 $100,000.00 SUBTOTAL BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE: $3,589,019.23 20%Contingency: $717,803.85 SUBTOTAL: $4,306,823.07 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget D 1-Pg &4�f 16 II. POTENTIAL PHASING A. PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAILHEAD-1.8 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $67,836.48 $67,836.48 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 Allow $8,000.00 $8,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 1,873 LF $10.00 $18,730.00 4. Erosion Control 79,788 SF $0.25 $19,947.00 5. Clear and Grub 79,788 SF $0.25 $19,947.00 6. Domestic Water Improvements 1 Allow $35,200.00 $35,200.00 7. Sewer Improvements 1 Allow $65,000.00 $65,000.00 8. Rough Grading 79,788 SF $0.75 $59,841.00 9. Site Drainage 79,788 SF $0.50 $39,894.00 10. 3"AC/4"AB(Drives) 16,317 SF $4.20 $68,531.40 11. 6"Curb&Gutter 1,056 LF $38.00 $40,128.00 12. 3-Wide V-Gutter 342 LF $40.00 $13,680.00 13. 4"Pedestrian Natural Grey Concrete 5,700 SF $10.00 $57,000.00 14. Restroom Building 1 Allow $380,000.00 $380,000.00 15. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 57,314 SF $4.00 $229,256.00 16. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 57,314 SF $2.00 $114,628.00 17. Irrigation Controller 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 18. 24"Box Trees 47 EA $350.00 $16,450.00 19. Pedestrian Security Lighting 12 EA $4,500.00 $54,000.00 20. Parking Lot Lighting 9 EA $5,500.00 $49,500.00 21. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $15,000.00 $15,000.00 22. Site Furniture 1 Allow $25,400.00 $25,400.00 23. Site Signage and Striping 1 Allow $8,000.00 $8,000.00 24.190-Day Maintenance 57,314 SF $0.15 $8,597.10 SUBTOTAL PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAILHEAD: $1,424,565.98 20%Contingency: $284,913.20 SUBTOTAL: $1,709,479.17 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget D 1-Pg &,5f 16 B. TERRACED GARDENS-5.2 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $97,555.28 $97,555.28 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 2,442 LF $10.00 $24,420.00 4. Erosion Control 225,795 SF $0.25 $56,448.75 S. Clear and Grub 225,795 SF $0.25 $56,448.75 6. Rough Grading 225,795 SF $0.75 $169,346.25 7. Site Drainage 225,795 SF $0.50 $112,897.50 8. 4"Pedestrian Natural Grey Concrete 13,364 SF $10.00 $133,640.00 9. Concrete Mowcurb 693 LF $10.00 $6,930.00 10. Concrete Stair Cheek Walls 184 LF $260.00 $47,840.00 11. Concrete Stairs 105 LF $105.00 $11,025.00 12. Concrete Stair Handrails 70 LF $130.00 $9,100.00 13. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 145,333 SF $4.00 $581,332.00 14. Landscape Improvements-Turf Sod,Soil Prep 47,953 SF $1.00 $47,953.00 15. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 145,333 SF $2.00 $290,666.00 16. Landscape Turf Irrigation 47,953 SF $1.80 $86,315.40 17. Irrigation Controller 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 18. 24"Box Trees 145 EA $350.00 $50,750.00 19. Pedestrian Security Lighting 15 EA $4,500.00 $67,500.00 20. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $30,000.00 $30,000.00 21. Gazebo 1 Allow $75,000.00 $75,000.00 22. Site Furniture 1 Allow $40,000.00 $40,000.00 23. Site Signage 1 Allow $4,500.00 $4,500.00 24,90-Day Maintenance 193,286 Allow $0.15 $28,992.90 SUBTOTAL TERRACED GARDENS: $2,048,660.83 20%Contingency: $409,732.17 SUBTOTAL: $2,458,392.99 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget D l_Pg %f 16 C. WATER CONSERVATION/DEMONSTRATION GARDEN-4.4 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $90,523.23 $90,523.23 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 Allow $8,000.00 $8,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 2,622 LF $10.00 $26,220.00 4. Erosion Control 191,754 SF $0.25 $47,938.50 S. Clear and Grub 191,754 SF $0.25 $47,938.50 6. Rough Grading 191,754 SF $0.75 $143,815.50 7. Site Drainage 191,754 SF $0.50 $95,877.00 8. Concrete Mowcurb 3,942 LF $10.00 $39,420.00 9. Decomposed Granite 10,205 SF $4.00 $40,820.00 10. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 176,900 SF $4.00 $707,600.00 11. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 176,900 SF $2.00 $353,800.00 12. Irrigation Controller 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 13. 24"Box Trees 110 EA $350.00 $38,500.00 14. Pedestrian Security Lighting 18 EA $4,500.00 $81,000.00 15. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $30,000.00 $30,000.00 16. Pedestrian Bridge 1 LS $80,000.00 $80,000.00 17. Site Furniture 1 LS $26,000.00 $26,000.00 18. Site Signage 1 Allow $7,000.00 $7,000.00 19. 90-Day Maintenance 176,900 SF $0.15 $26,535.00 SUBTOTAL WATER CONSERVATION/DEMONSTRATION GARDEN: $1,900,987.73 20%Contingency: $380,197.55 SUBTOTAL:[ $2,281,185.27 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget D 1—Pg 67of 16 D. AMPHITHEATER-11 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $276,286.23 $276,286.23 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 3,140 LF $10.00 $31,400.00 4. Erosion Control 469,636 SF $0.25 $117,409.00 S. Clear and Grub 469,636 SF $0.25 $117,409.00 6. 8"Fire Line 290 LF $110.00 $31,900.00 7. Fire Hydrants(300'o.c.) 1 EA $5,500.00 $5,500.00 8. Fire Line Hot Tap 1 EA $9,000.00 $9,000.00 9. Double Check Backflow Assembly 1 Allow $15,000.00 $15,000.00 10. Domestic Water Improvements 1 Allow $40,000.00 $40,000.00 11. Sewer Improvement Connection to Main 1 Allow $7,600.00 $7,600.00 12. Electrical Power/CATV/Fiber Improvements-Joint Trench 1 Allow $60,000.00 $60,000.00 13. Rough Grading 469,636 SF $0.75 $352,227.00 14. Site Drainage 469,636 SF $0.50 $234,818.00 15. 3"AC/4"AB(Drives) 31,818 SF $4.20 $133,635.60 16. 6"Curb&Gutter 2,590 LF $38.00 $98,420.00 17. 4"Natural Grey Concrete 29,627 SF $10.00 $296,270.00 18. 4"Integral Color Concrete 3,911 SF $12.00 $46,932.00 19. Concrete Mowcurb 2,285 LF $10.00 $22,850.00 20. Concrete Mowcurb Demarcation in Parking Lot 470 LF $10.00 $4,700.00 21. Concrete Channel Head Wall 123 LF $300.00 $36,900.00 22. Concrete Channel Drainage Pipe Connection 200 LF $250.00 $50,000.00 23. Concrete Stair Cheek Walls 134 LF $260.00 $34,840.00 24. Concrete Stairs 192 LF $105.00 $20,160.00 25. Concrete Seatwalls 621 LF $150.00 $93,150.00 26. Stair Handrails 120 LF $130.00 $15,600.00 27. Amphitheater Building 1,320 SF $400.00 $528,000.00 28. Amphitheater Covered Stage 1,300 SF $180.00 $234,000.00 29. Amphitheater Stage Lighting and Event Power 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000.00 30. Decomposed Granite 1,924 SF $4.00 $7,696.00 31. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 253,658 SF $4.00 $1,014,632.00 32. Landscape Improvements-Turf Sod,Soil Prep 138,814 SF $1.00 $138,814.00 33. Grass Pave/Turf Reinforcement in Parking Lot 39,021 SF $10.00 $390,210.00 34. Grass Pave in Fire Lane 920 SF $10.00 $9,200.00 35. Fire Lane Mow Curb 440 SF $10.00 $4,400.00 36. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 253,658 SF $2.00 $507,316.00 37. Landscape Turf Irrigation 138,814 SF $1.80 $249,865.20 38. Irrigation Controller 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 39. 24"Box Trees 304 EA $350.00 $106,400.00 40. Pedestrian Security Lighting 29 EA $4,500.00 $130,500.00 41. Parking Lot Lighting 11 EA $5,500.00 $60,500.00 42. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $54,900.00 $54,900.00 43. Site Furniture 1 Allow $31,200.00 $31,200.00 44. Fitness Equipment 1 Allow $28,800.00 $28,800.00 45. Site Signage and Striping 1 Allow $39,700.00 $39,700.00 46. 90-Day Maintenance 392,472 EA $0.15 $58,870.80 SUBTOTAL AMPHITHEATER: $5,802,010.83 20%Contingency: $1,160,402.17 SUBTOTAL:, $6,962,413.00 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget D l_Pg &&f 16 E. UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBLE PLAYGROUND-4.7 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $148,814.19 $148,814.19 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 2,434 LF $10.00 $24,340.00 4. Erosion Control 205,526 SF $0.25 $51,381.50 S. Clear and Grub 205,526 SF $0.25 $51,381.50 6. Domestic Water Improvements 1 Allow $34,000.00 $34,000.00 7. Sewer Improvements 1 Allow $5,000.00 $5,000.00 8. Rough Grading 205,526 SF $0.75 $154,144.50 9. Site Drainage 205,526 SF $0.50 $102,763.00 10. 3"AC/4"AB(Drives) 17,500 SF $4.20 $73,500.00 11. 6"Curb&Gutter 905 LF $38.00 $34,390.00 12. 4"Natural Grey Concrete 7,047 SF $10.00 $70,470.00 13. 4"Integral Color Concrete 2,014 SF $12.00 $24,168.00 14. Decomposed Granite 3,420 SF $4.00 $13,680.00 15. Concrete Mowcurb 3,252 LF $10.00 $32,520.00 16. Concrete Stair Cheek Walls 10 LF $260.00 $2,600.00 17. Concrete Stairs 109 LF $105.00 $11,445.00 18. Stair Handrails 20 LF $130.00 $2,600.00 19. Concrete Seatwalls 490 LF $150.00 $73,500.00 20. Children Theme Wall 68 LF $200.00 $13,600.00 21. Resilient Surfacing 15,521 SF $28.00 $434,588.00 22. Restroom Building 1 Allow $380,000.00 $380,000.00 23. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 92,578 SF $4.00 $370,312.00 24. Landscape Improvements-Turf Sod,Soil Prep 76,850 SF $1.00 $76,850.00 25. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 92,578 SF $2.00 $185,156.00 26. Landscape Turf Irrigation 76,850 SF $1.80 $138,330.00 27. Irrigation Controller 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 28. Children's Play Garden Play Equipment 1 Allow $300,000.00 $300,000.00 29. 24"Box Trees 99 EA $350.00 $34,650.00 30. Pedestrian Security Lighting 17 EA $4,500.00 $76,500.00 31. Parking Lot Lighting 4 EA $5,500.00 $22,000.00 32. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $17,000.00 $17,000.00 33. Gazebo 1 Allow $75,000.00 $75,000.00 34. Site Furniture 1 Allow $37,000.00 $37,000.00 35. Site Signage and Striping 1 Allow $8,000.00 $8,000.00 36. 90-Day Maintenance 169,428 SF $0.15 $25,414.20 SUBTOTAL UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBLE PLAYGROUND: $3,125,097.89 20%Contingency: $625,019.58 SUBTOTAL: $3,750,117.46 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget D 1-Pg &gf 16 F. VINEYARD/VITICULTURE PAVILION-6.7 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $194,332.13 $194,332.13 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 LS $8,000.00 $8,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 2,940 LF $10.00 $29,400.00 4. Erosion Control 271,237 SF $0.25 $67,809.25 S. Clear and Grub 271,237 SF $0.25 $67,809.25 6. 8"Fire Line 320 LF $110.00 $35,200.00 7. Fire Hydrants(300'o.c.) 1 EA $5,500.00 $5,500.00 8. Fire Line Hot Tap 1 EA $9,000.00 $9,000.00 9. Double Check Backflow Assembly 1 Allow $15,000.00 $15,000.00 10. Domestic Water Improvements 1 Allow $47,100.00 $47,100.00 11. Sewer Improvement Connection to Main 1 Allow $5,000.00 $5,000.00 12. Electrical Power/CATV/Fiber Improvements-Joint Trench 1 Allow $83,200.00 $83,200.00 13. Gas Line and Connection in Base Line Road 1 Allow $80,000.00 $80,000.00 14. Rough Grading 271,237 SF $0.75 $203,427.75 15. Site Drainage 271,237 SF $0.50 $135,618.50 16. 3"AC/4"AB(Drives) 27,278 SF $4.20 $114,567.60 17..6"Curb&Gutter 1,520 LF $38.00 $57,760.00 18. 4"Natural Grey Concrete 22,905 SF $10.00 $229,050.00 19. 4"Integral Color Concrete 2,783 SF $12.00 $33,396.00 20. Concrete Mowcurb 2,306 LF $10.00 $23,060.00 21. Concrete Mowcurb Demarcation in Parking Lot 240 LF $10.00 $2,400.00 22. Concrete Cheek Walls 40 LF $260.00 $10,400.00 23. Stair Handrails 134 LF $105.00 $14,070.00 24. Concrete Stairs 45 LF $130.00 $5,850.00 25. Decomposed Granite 1,005 SF $4.00 $4,020.00 26. VitiCulture Pavilion 3,460 SF $400.00 $1,384,000.00 27. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 42,831 SF $4.00 $171,324.00 28. Landscape Improvements-Turf Sod,Soil Prep 140,608 SF $1.00 $140,608.00 29. Grass Pave in Fire Lane and Parking Lot 23,875 SF $10.00 $238,750.00 30. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 42,831 SF $2.00 $85,662.00 31. Landscape Turf Irrigation 140,608 SF $1.80 $253,094.40 32. Irrigation Controller 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 33. 24"Box Trees 79 EA $350.00 $27,650.00 34. Pedestrian Security Lighting 22 EA $4,500.00 $99,000.00 35. Parking Lot Lighting 6 EA $5,500.00 $33,000.00 36. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $44,500.00 $44,500.00 37. Site Furniture 1 Allow $57,500.00 $57,500.00 38. Site Signage and Striping 1 Allow $27,400.00 $27,400.00 39. 90-Day Maintenance 183,439 SF $0.15 $27,515.85 SUBTOTAL VINEYARD/VITICULTURE CENTER: $4,080,974.73 20%Contingency: $816,194.95 SUBTOTAL: $4,897,169.68 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget D 1-Pg 7f 16 G. UPPER PARK AND EVENT AREA-2.6 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $40,794.40 $40,794.40 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 1,566 LF $10.00 $15,660.00 4. Erosion Control 114,578 SF $0.25 $28,644.50 S. Clear and Grub 114,578 SF $0.25 $28,644.50 6. Rough Grading 114,578 SF $0.75 $85,933.50 7. Site Drainage 114,578 SF $0.50 $57,289.00 8. Decomposed Granite 5,040 SF $4.00 $20,160.00 9. Concrete Mowcurb 1,680 LF $10.00 $16,800.00 10. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 42,340 SF $4.00 $169,360.00 11. Landscape Improvements-Turf Sod,Soil Prep 68,090 SF $1.00 $68,090.00 12. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 42,340 SF $2.00 $84,680.00 13. Landscape Turf Irrigation 68,090 SF $1.80 $122,562.00 14. Irrigation Controller 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 15. 24"Box Trees 50 EA $350.00 $17,500.00 16. Pedestrian Security Lighting 10 EA $4,500.00 $45,000.00 17. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $13,000.00 $13,000.00 18. Site Furniture 1 Allow $12,000.00 $12,000.00 19. Site Signage 1 Allow $2,000.00 $2,000.00 20. 90-Day Maintenance 110,430 SF $0.15 $16,564.50 SUBTOTAL UPPER PARK AND EVENT AREA: $856,682.40 20%Contingency: $171,336.48 SUBTOTAL: $1,028,018.88 H. EVENT PARKING AREA-4.4 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $89,018.28 $89,018.28 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 LS $8,000.00 $8,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 2,097 LF $10.00 $20,970.00 4. Erosion Control 174,834 SF $0.25 $43,708.50 S. Clear and Grub 174,834 SF $0.25 $43,708.50 6. Rough Grading 174,834 SF $0.75 $131,125.50 7. Site Drainage 174,834 SF $0.50 $87,417.00 8. 3"AC/4"AB(Drives) 35,448 SF $4.20 $148,881.60 9. 6"Curb&Gutter 2,672 LF $38.00 $101,536.00 10. 4"Natural Grey Concrete 11,323 SF $10.00 $113,230.00 11. Concrete Mowcurb 1,054 LF $10.00 $10,540.00 12. Concrete Mowcurb Demarcation in Parking Lot 310 LF $10.00 $3,100.00 13. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 61,731 SF $4.00 $246,924.00 14. Landscape Improvements-Turf Sod,Soil Prep 64,384 SF $1.00 $64,384.00 15. Grass Pave/Turf Reinforcement in Parking Lot 32,777 SF $10.00 $327,770.00 16. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 61,731 SF $2.00 $123,462.00 17. Landscape Turf Irrigation 64,384 SF $1.80 $115,891.20 18. Irrigation Controller 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 19. 24"Box Trees 98 EA $350.00 $34,300.00 20. Pedestrian Security Lighting 10 EA $4,500.00 $45,000.00 21. Parking Lot Lighting 8 EA $5,500.00 $44,000.00 22. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $22,500.00 $22,500.00 23. Site Signage and Striping 1 Allow $15,000.00 $15,000.00 24. 90-Day Maintenance 126,115 SF $0.15 $18,917.25 SUBTOTAL EVENT PARKING AREA: $1,869,383.83 20%Contingency: $373,876.77 SUBTOTAL: $2,243,260.59 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget D l_Pg Tl.f 16 I. ADVENTURE AREA AND PARKING-9.5 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $252,655.97 $252,655.97 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 4,250 LF $10.00 $42,500.00 4. Erosion Control 414,814 SF $0.25 $103,703.50 S. Clear and Grub 414,814 SF $0.25 $103,703.50 6. 8"Fire Line 280 LF $110.00 $30,800.00 7. Fire Hydrants(300'o.c.) 1 EA $5,500.00 $5,500.00 8. Fire Line Hot Tap 1 EA $9,000.00 $9,000.00 9. Double Check Backflow Assembly 1 Allow $15,000.00 $15,000.00 10. Domestic Water Improvements 1 Allow $60,900.00 $60,900.00 11. Sewer Improvements 1 Allow $8,000.00 $8,000.00 12. Rough Grading 414,814 SF $0.75 $311,110.50 13. Site Drainage 414,814 SF $0.50 $207,407.00 14. 3"AC/4"AB(Drives) 46,346 SF $4.20 $194,653.20 15. 6"Curb&Gutter 2,536 LF $38.00 $96,368.00 16. 4"Natural Grey Concrete 25,795 SF $10.00 $257,950.00 17. 4"Integral Color Concrete 6,253 SF $12.00 $75,036.00 18. Concrete Mowcurb 1,284 LF $10.00 $12,840.00 19. Concrete Bulkhead @ wood chips 472 LF $110.00 $51,920.00 20. Concrete Seatwalls 378 LF $150.00 $56,700.00 21. Decomposed Granite 2,038 SF $4.00 $8,152.00 22. Wood Chips @ Challenge Course 25,086 SF $10.00 $250,860.00 23. Restroom Building 1 Allow $380,000.00 $380,000.00 24. Picnic Pavilion and Deck 1 Allow $150,000.00 $150,000.00 25. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 226,484 SF $4.00 $905,936.00 26. Landscape Improvements-Turf Sod,Soil Prep 79,098 SF $1.00 $79,098.00 27. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 226,484 SF $2.00 $452,968.00 28. Landscape Turf Irrigation 79,098 SF $1.80 $142,376.40 29. Irrigation Controller 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 30. Challenge Course Equipment 1 Allow $275,000.00 $275,000.00 31. Fitness Equipment 1 Allow $43,200.00 $43,200.00 32. 24"Box Trees 229 EA $350.00 $80,150.00 33. 36"Box Trees 1 EA $850.00 $850.00 34. Pedestrian Security Lighting 26 EA $4,500.00 $117,000.00 35. Parking Lot Lighting 7 EA $5,500.00 $38,500.00 36. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $53,100.00 $53,100.00 37. Pedestrian Bridge 3 Allow $90,000.00 $270,000.00 38. Site Furniture 1 Allow $76,500.00 $76,500.00 39. Site Signage and Striping 1 Allow $15,500.00 $15,500.00 40.190-Day Maintenance 305,582 SF $0.15 $45,837.30 SUBTOTAL ADVENTURE CHALLENGE AND PARKING: $5,305,775.37 20%Contingency: $1,061,155.07 SUBTOTAL: $6,366,930.44 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget Dl-Pg -102f 16 J. DOG PARK-4.4 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $100,205.98 $100,205.98 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 1,916 LF $10.00 $19,160.00 4. Erosion Control 173,241 SF $0.25 $43,310.25 S. Clear and Grub 173,241 SF $0.25 $43,310.25 6. Domestic Water Improvements 1 Allow $52,800.00 $52,800.00 7. Sewer Improvements 1 Allow $9,000.00 $9,000.00 8. Rough Grading 173,241 SF $0.75 $129,930.75 9. Site Drainage 173,241 SF $0.50 $86,620.50 10. 3"AC/4"AB(Drives) 20,300 SF $4.20 $85,260.00 11. 6"Curb&Gutter 1,028 LF $38.00 $39,064.00 12. 4"Natural Grey Concrete 11,484 SF $10.00 $114,840.00 13. Concrete Mowcurb 185 LF $10.00 $1,850.00 14. 5'Ht.Lodge Pole Fence w/Wire Cloth @ Entry 242 LF $85.00 $20,570.00 15. 5'Ht.Lodge Pole Fence @ back(9 Gauge) 1,658 LF $50.00 $82,900.00 16. 5'HL Double Chain Link Maintenance Gate 3 EA $3,500.00 $10,500.00 17. Restroom Building 1 Allow $380,000.00 $380,000.00 18. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 55,708 SF $4.00 $222,832.00 19. Landscape Improvements-Turf Sod,Soil Prep 80,288 SF $1.00 $80,288.00 20. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 55,708 SF $2.00 $111,416.00 21. Landscape Turf Irrigation 80,288 SF $1.80 $144,518.40 22. Irrigation Controller 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 23. 24"Box Trees 82 EA $350.00 $28,700.00 24. 36"Box Trees 1 EA $850.00 $850.00 25. Pedestrian Security Lighting 5 EA $4,500.00 $22,500.00 26. Parking Lot Lighting 3 EA $5,500.00 $16,500.00 27. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $13,000.00 $13,000.00 28. Gazebo 2 EA $75,000.00 $150,000.00 29. Site Furniture 1 Allow $51,500.00 $51,500.00 30. Site Signage and Striping 1 Allow $7,500.00 $7,500.00 31. 90-Day Maintenance 135,996 SF $0.15 $20,399.40 SUBTOTAL DOG PARK: $2,104,325.53 20%Contingency: $420,865.11 SUBTOTAL:r $2,525,190.63 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget D 1-Pg 71af 16 K. MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER AND PARKING-6.4 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $386,150.01 $386,150.01 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 2,672 LF $10.00 $26,720.00 4. Erosion Control 278,784 SF $0.25 $69,696.00 S. Clear and Grub 278,784 SF $0.25 $69,696.00 6. 8"Fire Line 860 LF $110.00 $94,600.00 7. Fire Hydrants(300'o.c.) 4 EA $5,500.00 $22,000.00 8. Fire Line Hot Tap 1 EA $9,000.00 $9,000.00 9. Double Check Backflow Assembly 1 Allow $15,000.00 $15,000.00 10. Domestic Water Improvements 1 Allow $52,500.00 $52,500.00 11. Sewer Improvement Connection to Main 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 12. Electrical Power/CATV/Fiber Improvements-Joint Trench 1 Allow $98,800.00 $98,800.00 13. Gas Line and Connection in Central Park Drive West 1 Allow $35,000.00 $35,000.00 14. Rough Grade 278,784 SF $0.75 $209,088.00 15. Site Drainage 278,784 SF $0.50 $139,392.00 16. 3"AC/4"AB(Drives) 83,643 SF $4.20 $351,300.60 17. 6"Curb&Gutter 2,253 LF $38.00 $85,614.00 18. 4"Natural Grey Concrete 6,415 SF $10.00 $64,150.00 19. 4"Integral Color Concrete 13,802 SF $12.00 $165,624.00 20. 6"Vehicular Concrete 8,794 SF $15.00 $131,910.00 21. Concrete Mowcurb 995 LF $10.00 $9,950.00 22. Multi-Purpose Center Building 1 Allow $4,600,000.00 $4,600,000.00 23. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 72,562 SF $4.00 $290,248.00 24. Landscape Improvements-Turf Sod,Soil Prep 17,235 SF $1.00 $17,235.00 25. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 72,562 SF $2.00 $145,124.00 26. Landscape Turf Irrigation 17,235 SF $1.80 $31,023.00 27. Irrigation Controller 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 28. Grass Pave 12,161 SF $10.00 $121,610.00 29. 36"Box Trees 1 EA $850.00 $850.00 30. 24"Box Trees 98 EA $350.00 $34,300.00 31. Pond Water Feature 18,000 SF $500,000.00 $500,000.00 32. Pedestrian Security Lighting 13 EA $4,500.00 $58,500.00 33. Parking Lot Lighting 19 EA $5,500.00 $104,500.00 34. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $44,100.00 $44,100.00 35. Site Furniture 1 Allow $27,000.00 $27,000.00 36.1 Site Signage and Striping 1 Allow $30,000.00 $30,000.00 37.190-Day Maintenance 89,797 SF $0.15 $13,469.55 SUBTOTAL MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER AND PARKING: $8,109,150.16 20%Contingency: $1,621,830.03 SUBTOTAL: $9,730,980.19 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget D 1-Pg t�4f 16 L. RECREATION POOL-2.7 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $268,247.65 $268,247.65 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 1,900 LF $10.00 $19,000.00 4. Erosion Control 107,174 SF $0.25 $26,793.50 S. Clear and Grub 107,174 SF $0.25 $26,793.50 6. 8"Fire Line-Under Phase K LF $0.00 $0.00 7. Fire Hydrants(300'o.c.)-Under Phase K EA $0.00 $0.00 8. Fire Line Hot Tap-Under Phase K EA $0.00 $0.00 9. Double Check Backflow Assembly-Under Phase K Allow $0.00 $0.00 10. Domestic Water Improvements-Under Phase K Allow $0.00 $0.00 11. Sewer Improvement Connection to Main 1 Allow $7,000.00 $7,000.00 12. Electrical Power/CATV/Fiber Improvements-Joint Trench- Allow $0.00 $0.00 Under Phase K 13. Gas Line and Connection in Base Line Road-Under Phase K Allow $0.00 $0.00 14. Rough Grading 107,174 SF $0.75 $80,380.50 15. Site Drainage 107,174 SF $0.50 $53,587.00 16. 3"AC/4"AB(Drives) 31,279 SF $4.20 $131,371.80 17. 6"Curb&Gutter 1,682 LF $38.00 $63,916.00 18. 4"Natural Grey Concrete 5,286 SF $10.00 $52,860.00 19. Recreation Pool(4,770 S.F.) 1 Allow $1,400,000.00 $1,400,000.00 20. Splash Pad(2,124 S.F.) 1 Allow $400,000.00 $400,000.00 21. Pool Deck 15,867 SF $25.00 $396,675.00 22. Pool Fencing 560 LF $200.00 $112,000.00 23. Recreation Pool Building 4,924 SF $400.00 $1,969,600.00 24. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 43,171 SF $4.00 $172,684.00 25. Landscape Improvements-Turf Sod,Soil Prep 2,812 SF $1.00 $2,812.00 26. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 43,171 SF $2.00 $86,342.00 27. Landscape Turf Irrigation 2,812 SF $1.80 $5,061.60 28. Irrigation Controller 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 29. 24"Box Trees 45 EA $350.00 $15,750.00 30. Pedestrian Security Lighting 14 EA $6,500.00 $91,000.00 31. Parking Lot Lighting 8 EA $5,500.00 $44,000.00 32. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $25,000.00 $25,000.00 33. Pedestrian Bridge 1 Allow $80,000.00 $80,000.00 34. Site Furniture 1 Allow $38,000.00 $38,000.00 35. Site Signage and Striping 1 Allow $25,500.00 $25,500.00 36,90-Day Maintenance 58,841 SF $0.15 $8,826.15 SUBTOTAL RECREATION POOL AND SPLASH PAD: $5,633,200.70 20%Contingency: $1,126,640.14 SUBTOTAL: $6,759,840.84 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget D 1-Pg 75f 16 M. TENNIS COURTS-3.1 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $103,798.86 $103,798.86 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 1,652 LF $10.00 $16,520.00 4. Erosion Control 134,806 SF $0.25 $33,701.50 S. Clear and Grub 134,806 SF $0.25 $33,701.50 6. Rough Grading 134,806 SF $0.75 $101,104.50 7. Site Drainage 134,806 SF $0.50 $67,403.00 8. 4"Natural Grey Concrete 1,616 SF $10.00 $16,160.00 9. 4"Integral Color Concrete 7,865 SF $12.00 $94,380.00 10. Lighted Tennis Courts 4 EA $240,000.00 $960,000.00 11. Concrete Terraced Seating 180 LF $150.00 $27,000.00 12. Concrete Mowcurb 476 LF $10.00 $4,760.00 13. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 75,688 SF $4.00 $302,752.00 14. Landscape Improvements-Turf 12,412 SF $1.00 $12,412.00 15. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 75,688 SF $2.00 $151,376.00 16. Landscape Turf Irrigation 12,412 SF $1.80 $22,341.60 17. Irrigation Controller 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 18. 24"Box Trees 95 EA $350.00 $33,250.00 19. Pedestrian Security Lighting 8 EA $5,800.00 $46,400.00 20. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $8,000.00 $8,000.00 21. Gazebo 1 Allow $75,000.00 $75,000.00 22. Site Furniture 1 Allow $35,000.00 $35,000.00 23. Site Signage 1 Allow $1,500.00 $1,500.00 24. 90-Day Maintenance 88,100 SF $0.15 $13,215.00 SUBTOTAL TENNIS COURTS: $2,179,775.96 20%Contingency: $435,955.19 SUBTOTAL: $2,615,731.15 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget Dl-Pg 74&f 16 N. MAINTENANCE YARD-1.6 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $106,274.73 $106,274.73 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 LS $8,000.00 $8,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 605 LF $10.00 $6,050.00 4. Erosion Control 69,696 SF $0.25 $17,424.00 S. Clear and Grub 69,696 SF $0.25 $17,424.00 6. 8"Fire Line 510 LF $110.00 $56,100.00 7. Fire Hydrants 1 EA $5,500.00 $5,500.00 8. Fire Line Hot Tap 1 EA $9,000.00 $9,000.00 9. Double Check Backflow Assembly 1 Allow $15,000.00 $15,000.00 10. Domestic Water Improvements 1 Allow $54,300.00 $54,300.00 11. Sewer Improvements 1 Allow $9,000.00 $9,000.00 12. Clarifier 1 Allow $50,000.00 $50,000.00 13. Electrical Power/CATV/Fiber Improvements-Joint Trench 1 Allow $104,400.00 $104,400.00 Gas Line-Assumes Connection to Gas Line located in Central 1 Allow $36,000.00 $36,000.00 14. park Drive West in Phase K 15. Rough Grading 69,696 SF $0.75 $52,272.00 16. Site Drainage 69,696 SF $0.50 $34,848.00 17. Vehicular Concrete in Maintenance Yard 15,980 SF $10.00 $159,800.00 18. 10'Wide Vehicular Concrete Access Road 8,995 SF $12.00 $107,940.00 19. 6"Curb&Gutter 768 LF $38.00 $29,184.00 20. Maintenance Building 2,080 SF $400.00 $832,000.00 21. Maintenance Walls-Reinforced Concrete Block 290 LF $250.00 $72,500.00 22. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 38,350 SF $3.00 $115,050.00 23. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 38,350 SF $2.00 $76,700.00 24. Irrigation Controller 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 25. 24"Box Trees 45 EA $350.00 $15,750.00 26. Security Lighting 6 EA $5,500.00 $33,000.00 27. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $8,000.00 $8,000.00 28. EV Charging Station 1 Allow $33,000.00 $33,000.00 29. Fuel Station+CNG 1 Allow $150,000.00 $150,000.00 30. Site Signage 1 Allow $1,500.00 $1,500.00 31. 90-Day Maintenance 38,350 SF $0.15 $5,752.50 SUBTOTAL MAINTENANCE YARD: $2,231,769.23 20%Contingency: $446,353.85 SUBTOTAL:r $2,678,123.07 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget D 1-Pg 77of 16 0. DEER CREEK CHANNEL TRAIL-4.1 Acres 1. Mobilization(5%of the subtotal) 1 Allow $80,004.92 $80,004.92 2. Surveying and Construction Staking 1 LS $8,000.00 $8,000.00 3. Construction Chainlink Fencing 4,410 LF $10.00 $44,100.00 4. Erosion Control 178,596 SF $0.25 $44,649.00 S. Clear and Grub 178,596 SF $0.25 $44,649.00 6. Rough Grading 178,596 SF $0.75 $133,947.00 7. Site Drainage 178,596 SF $0.50 $89,298.00 8. Concrete Mowcurbs 2,590 LF $10.00 $25,900.00 9. Decomposed Granite 7,800 SF $4.00 $31,200.00 10. Landscape Improvements-Planting,Soil Prep,Mulch 153,910 SF $4.00 $615,640.00 11. Landscape Shrub Irrigation 153,910 SF $2.00 $307,820.00 12. 24"Box Trees 135 EA $350.00 $47,250.00 13. Site Lighting 28 EA $4,500.00 $126,000.00 14. Electrical Conduit,Wire and Distribution 1 Allow $32,400.00 $32,400.00 1S. Site Furniture 1 Allow $16,000.00 $16,000.00 16. Site Signage 1 Allow $4,000.00 $4,000.00 17. 90-Day Maintenance 194,969 SF $0.15 $29,245.35 TRAIL: $1,680,103.27 20%Contingency: $336,020.65 SUBTOTAL: $2,016,123.92 TOTAL(Item I.Backbone Infrastructure and Item II.Potential Phase Areas A-0): $62,329,780.36 THE ABOVE ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE PROFESSIONAL FEES FOR DESIGN SERVICES. RJM HAS PREPARED THIS ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST ON THE BASIS OF ITS BEST PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT AND EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY. THE ESTIMATE, HOWEVER, REPRESENTS ASSUMPTIONS AND OPINIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION MARKET AND CONTRACTOR'S METHODS OF DETERMINING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OVER WHICH RJM HAS NO CONTROL. IF THE OWNER WISHES GREATER ASSURANCE AS TO THE CONSTRUCTION COST, HE SHALL EMPLOY AN INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATOR THE ABOVE OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS IS BASED UPON THE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT EXHIBITS DATED JANUARY 2018. THIS OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS IS BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING EXCLUSIONS: A. CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FEES B. DESIGN FEES C. PROFESSIONAL FEES,INSPECTIONS AND TESTING D. ESCALATION E. PLAN CHECK FEES AND BUILDING PERMIT FEES F. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FEES G. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY H. SOFT COSTS I. FF&E 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Construction Budget Dl—Pg 76&f 16 W Ccniminity inspjircd Sgpaces q pr DESIGN Rj M GROUP CENTRALPARK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA OPINION OF PROBABLE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE BUDGET 1/25/18 This opinion of probable maintenance budget is based on the City's current annual maintenance program at various parks and facilities located in the City. SUMMARY OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PER POTENTIAL PHASING A. PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL-1.8 Acres $36,685.14 B. TERRACED GARDENS-5.2 Acres $51,483.23 C. WATER CONSERVATION/DEMONSTRATION GARDEN- 4.4 Acres $45,496.88 D. AMPHITHEATER-11 Acres $140,108.42 E. UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBLE PLAYGROUND-4.7 $101,470.38 F. VINEYARD/VITICULTURE PAVILION-6.7 $76,991.17 G. UPPER PARK AND EVENT AREA-2.6 Acres $32,245.97 H. EVENT PARKING AREA-4.4 Acres $62,802.28 1. ADVENTURE AREA AND PARKING-9.5 Acres $176,322.64 J. DOG PARK-4.4 Acres $64,148.20 K. MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER-6.4 Acres $303,427.75 L. RECREATION POOL-2.7 Acres $166,509.13 M. TENNIS COURTS-3.1 Acres $25,365.12 N. MAINTENANCE YARD-1.6 Acres $45,664.20 O. DEER CREEK CHANNEL TRAIL-4.1 Acres $39,534.12 TOTAL FOR ITEMS I-II $1,368,254.63 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Maintenance Budget DI-Pg 79 of 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION EST QTY I UNIT JUNITORiCE I SUBTOTAL POTENTIAL PHASING A. I PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAILHEAD-1.8 Acres 1. AC Parking Lot and Driveways 16,317 SF $0.65 $10,606.05 2. Restroom Building 1 Allow $8,000.00 $8,000.00 3. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 54,946 SF $0.12 $6,593.52 4. Bioretention Basin 2,368 SF $0.09 $213.12 5.1 Landscape Irrigation 57,314 SF $0.09 $5,158.26 SUBTOTAL PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAILHEAD: $30,570.95 20%Contingency: $6,114.19 SUBTOTAL: $36,685.14 B. TERRACED GARDENS-5.2 Acres 1. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 142,499 SF $0.12 $17,099.88 2. Bioretention Basin 2,834 SF $0.09 $255.06 3. Turf Mowing 47,953 SF $0.17 $8,152.01 4. Landscape Irrigation 193,286 SF $0.09 $17,395.74 SUBTOTAL TERRACED GARDENS: $42,902.69 20%Contingency: $8,580.54 SUBTOTAL: $51,483.23 C. WATER CONSERVATION/DEMONSTRATION GARDEN-4.4 Acres 1. Decomposed Granite 10,205 SF $0.08 $816.40 2. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 175,189 SF $0.12 $21,022.68 3. Bioretention Basin 1,711 SF $0.09 $153.99 4. Landscape Irrigation 176,900 SF $0.09 $15,921.00 SUBTOTAL WATER CONSERVATION/DEMONSTRATION GARDEN: $37,914.07 20%Contingency: $7,582.81 SUBTOTAL: $45,496.88 D. AMPHITHEATER-11 Acres 1. AC Parking Lot and Driveways 31,818 SF $0.65 $20,681.70 2. Amphitheater Building 1 Allow $5,000.00 $5,000.00 3. Amphitheater Covered Stage 1 Allow $2,000.00 $2,000.00 4. Decomposed Granite 1,924 SF $0.08 $153.92 S. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 239,044 SF $0.12 $28,685.28 6. Bioretention Basin 14,614 SF $0.09 $1,315.26 7. Turf Mowing 138,814 SF $0.17 $23,598.38 8. Landscape Irrigation 392,472 SF $0.09 $35,322.48 SUBTOTAL AMPHITHEATER: $116,757.02 20%Contingency: $23,351.40 SUBTOTAL: $140,108.42 E. UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBLE PLAYGROUND-4.7 Acres 1. AC Parking Lot and Driveways 17,500 SF $0.65 $11,375.00 2. Decomposed Granite 3,420 SF $0.08 $273.60 3. Playground and Resilient Surfacing 15,521 SF $1.65 $25,609.65 4. Restroom Building 1 Allow $8,000.00 $8,000.00 5. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 88,512 SF $0.12 $10,621.44 6. Bioretention Basin 4,066 SF $0.09 $365.94 7. Turf Mowing 76,850 SF $0.17 $13,064.50 8. Landscape Irrigation 169,428 SF $0.09 $15,248.52 SUBTOTAL UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBLE PLAYGROUND: $84,558.65 20%Contingency: $16,911.73 SUBTOTAL: $101,470.38 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Maintenance Budget D1-Pg 80of 5 F. VINEYARD/VITICULTURE PAVILION-6.7 Acres 1. AC Parking Lot and Driveways 27,278 SF $0.65 $17,730.70 2. Decomposed Granite 1,005 SF $0.08 $80.40 3. VitiCulture Pavilion 3,460 SF $0.32 $1,107.20 4. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 32,445 SF $0.12 $3,893.40 S. Bioretention Basin 10,386 SF $0.09 $934.74 6. Turf Mowing 140,608 SF $0.17 $23,903.36 7. Landscape Irrigation 183,439 SF $0.09 $16,509.51 SUBTOTAL VINEYARD/VITICULTURE CENTER: $64,159.31 20%Contingency: $12,831.86 SUBTOTAL: $76,991.17 G. UPPER PARK AND EVENT AREA-2.6 Acres 1. Decomposed Granite 5,040 SF $0.08 $403.20 2. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 38,128 SF $0.12 $4,575.36 3. Bioretention Basin 4,212 SF $0.09 $379.08 4. Turf Mowing 68,090 SF $0.17 $11,575.30 S.I Landscape Irrigation 110,430 SF $0.09 $9,938.70 SUBTOTAL UPPER PARK AND EVENT AREA: $26,871.64 20%Contingency: $5,374.33 SUBTOTAL: $32,245.97 H. EVENT PARKING AREA-4.4 Acres 1. AC Parking Lot and Driveways 35,448 SF $0.65 $23,041.20 2. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 48,087 SF $0.12 $5,770.44 3. Bioretention Basin 13,644 SF $0.09 $1,227.96 4. Turf Mowing 64,384 SF $0.17 $10,945.28 5. Landscape Irrigation 126,115 SF $0.09 $11,350.35 SUBTOTAL EVENT PARKING AREA: $52,335.23 20%Contingency: $10,467.05 SUBTOTAL: $62,802.28 I. ADVENTURE AREA AND PARKING-9.5 Acres 1. AC Parking Lot and Driveways 46,346 SF $0.65 $30,124.90 2. Challenge Equipment and Wood Chips 25,086 SF $1.65 $41,391.90 3. Restroom Building 1 Allow $8,000.00 $8,000.00 4. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 202,871 SF $0.12 $24,344.52 S. Bioretention Basin 23,613 SF $0.09 $2,125.17 6. Turf Mowing 79,098 SF $0.17 $13,446.66 7. Landscape Irrigation 305,582 SF $0.09 $27,502.38 SUBTOTAL ADVENTURE CHALLENGE AND PARKING: $146,935.53 20%Contingency: $29,387.11 SUBTOTAL: $176,322.64 J. DOG PARK-4.4 Acres 1. AC Parking Lot and Driveways 20,300 SF $0.65 $13,195.00 2. Restroom Building 1 Allow $8,000.00 $8,000.00 3. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 45,317 SF $0.12 $5,438.04 4. Bioretention Basin 10,391 SF $0.09 $935.19 5.1 Turf Mowing 80,288 SF $0.17 $13,648.96 6.1 Landscape Irrigation 135,996 SF $0.09 $12,239.64 SUBTOTAL DOG PARK: $53,456.83 20%Contingency: $10,691.37 SUBTOTAL:, $64,148.20 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Maintenance Budget D1-Pg 81 of 5 K. MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER AND PARKING-6.4 Acres 1. AC Parking Lot and Driveways 83,643 SF $0.65 $54,367.95 2. Multi-Purpose Center Building 16,507 SF $7.65 $126,278.55 3. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 72,562 SF $0.12 $8,707.44 4. Bioretention Basin 13,838 SF $0.09 $1,245.42 S. Turf Mowing 17,235 SF $0.17 $2,929.95 6. Landscape Irrigation 103,635 SF $0.09 $9,327.15 7. Pond Water Feature 1 Allow $50,000.00 $50,000.00 SUBTOTAL MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER AND PARKING: $252,856.46 20%Contingency: $50,571.29 SUBTOTAL: $303,427.75 L. RECREATION POOL-2.7 Acres 1. Parking Lot Lighting 31,279 SF $0.65 $20,331.35 2. Recreation Pool(4,770 S.F.) 1 Allow $60,000.00 $60,000.00 3. Splash Pad(2,124 S.F.) 1 Allow $10,000.00 $10,000.00 4. Recreation Pool Building 4,924 SF $7.65 $37,668.60 S. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 36,618 SF $0.12 $4,394.16 6. Bioretention Basin 6,553 SF $0.09 $589.77 7. Turf Mowing 2,812 SF $0.17 $478.04 8. Landscape Irrigation 58,841 SF $0.09 $5,295.69 SUBTOTAL RECREATION POOL AND SPLASH PAD: $138,757.61 20%Contingency: $27,751.52 SUBTOTAL: $166,509.13 M. TENNIS COURTS-3.1 Acres 1. Lighted Tennis Courts 28,800 EA $0.07 $2,016.00 2. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 75,688 SF $0.12 $9,082.56 3. Turf Mowing 12,412 SF $0.17 $2,110.04 4. Landscape Irrigation 88,100 SF $0.09 $7,929.00 SUBTOTAL TENNIS COURTS: $21,137.60 20%Contingency: $4,227.52 SUBTOTAL:1 $25,365.12 N. MAINTENANCE YARD-1.6 Acres 1. Maintenance Building 1 Allow $30,000.00 $30,000.00 2. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 38,350 SF $0.12 $4,602.00 3. Landscape Irrigation 38,350 SF $0.09 $3,451.50 SUBTOTAL MAINTENANCE YARD: $38,053.50 20%Contingency: $7,610.70 SUBTOTAL:r $45,664.20 0. DEER CREEK CHANNEL TRAIL-4.1 Acres 1. Decomposed Granite 7,800 SF $0.08 $624.00 2. Shrub and Groundcover Planting 153,910 SF $0.12 $18,469.20 3. Landscape Irrigation 153,910 SF $0.09 $13,851.90 SUBTOTAL DEER CREEK CHANNEL TRAIL: $32,945.10 20%Contingency: $6,589.02 SUBTOTAL: $39,534.12 TOTAL(Potential Maintenance Budget Phase Areas A-O):1 $1,368,254.63 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Maintenance Budget Dl-Pg 82-f 5 THE ABOVE ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE PROFESSIONAL FEES FOR DESIGN SERVICES. RJM HAS PREPARED THIS ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST ON THE BASIS OF ITS BEST PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT AND EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY. THE ESTIMATE, HOWEVER, REPRESENTS ASSUMPTIONS AND OPINIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION MARKET AND CONTRACTOR'S METHODS OF DETERMINING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OVER WHICH RJM HAS NO CONTROL. IF THE OWNER WISHES GREATER ASSURANCE AS TO THE CONSTRUCTION COST, HE SHALL EMPLOY AN INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATOR THE ABOVE OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS IS BASED UPON THE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT EXHIBITS DATED JANUARY 2018. THIS OPINION OF PROBABLE MAINTENANCE COSTS IS BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING EXCLUSIONS: A.PUBLIC UTILITIES IN CENTRAL PARK DRIVE WEST B.INSPECTIONS AND TESTING C. ESCALATION 290-80 Rancho Cucamonga Central Park-Opinion of Probable Maintenance Budget D1-Pg 88 of 5 F t I GATE: March 26, 2018. TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner ` INITIATED BY: Dat Tran, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00141 - J.R. MILLER & ASSOCIATES - A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed39,600-square feat industrial building and two ancillary equipment buildings totaling 9,166 square feet on an existing industrial site totaling 17.5 acres of land in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/Hl) District, located south of Arrow Highway and west of Rochester Avenue„ APN. 0229-111-74 and 75, Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration per State CEQA Guidelines for consideration of environmental impacts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project and approve Design Review DRC2017-60141 through adoption of the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND: The project site consists of a 17.5-acre site located south of Arrow Highway and west of Rochester Avenue. The site was developed prior to the incorporation of the City in 1977 and continued to expand under a series of Design Review applications in the 1960s and early 1990s. Minor expansions, reconfigurations and tenant improvernents have also been approved throughout the existence of the site. The most recent approval for the site was Site Development Review DRC201 -00057 in May 2015, which allowed for the construction of two metal canopies„ one metal building addition and one generator pad for the site. The site continues to operate as an industrial manufacturing and warehousing facility. All buildings on the 17.5-acre site are owned and operated by a single owner: Arconic. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Floor Area Ratio; 0.44 B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin ; North - General Industrial (GI) -Adults Sports Park/Animal Care & Adoption Center South - Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/Hl) -- Industrial/Warehouse Building West - Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) - Industrial/Warehouse Building East - General Industrial (GI) -- Industrial/Warehouse Building El-Pg 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2017-00141 --J.R. MILLER &ASSOCIATES March 28, 2018 Page 2 C. General Plan Designations: North - ParkslGeneral Industrial South - Heavy Industrial West - Heavy Industrial East - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The combined 17.5-acre site is a flat, rectangular-shaped lot south of Arrow Highway and west of Rochester Avenue. The site is legally subdivided into three separate parcels but is owned and operated by a single user, Arconic. Two driveways located on Arrow Highway and a third driveway on Rochester Avenue provide access onto the site. The frontages along Arrow Highway and Rochester have been landscaped to provide screening for the interior of the site. The interior of the site consists primarily of an asphalt parking lot and hardscape areas. Substantial portions of the hardscaped areas are used for outdoor storage and general industrial operations. The site currently has a total of seven industrial and warehouse buildings and one office building.A second, vacant office building is located at the northwest corner of the site. The building was constructed by the previous owner of the property and currently does not house a use for Arconic. In the future, Arconic plans to convert the space into a conference room. No plans have been submitted for the future conversion. E. Parking Calculations: Type of Use Square Parking Number of Number of Fo_ otape Ratio Spaces Spaces Required Provided Office 16,500 11250 66 66 Warehouse 20,000 111000 20 20 20,000 112000 10 10 224,355 114000 56 56 Manufacturing 53,007 11500 107 119 Total 333,837 259 271 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to construct a 39,600-square foot industrial building on an existing industrial site totaling 17.5 acres of land. The site currently has a total of seven industrial buildings onsite, totaling 53,007 square feet of manufacturing and 264,355 square E1—Pg 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2017-00141 -- J.R. MILLER &ASSOCIATES March 28, 2018 Page 3 feet of warehouse space. The site also has an office and administration building consisting of 16,500 square feet of office space. The proposed 39,600 square foot building will consist of 14,276 square feet of manufacturing space and 25,324 square feet of warehousing space. It will have an overall height of 73 feet. The building will house up to 14 industrial furnaces and a new forging press to complement existing production onsite. The building will be located roughly at the center of the site and is surrounded by existing industrial buildings similar in scale and size. However, the building will be visible from both Arrow Highway, Rochester Avenue and from adjacent sites along the south and west property lines because of its overall height. The exterior of the building has been designed to consist of visually-interesting facades viewable from all vantage points. The design incorporates the use of metal wall panels with alternating vertical flutes to break up the expansive blank facade. The structure also incorporates the use of metal projections and polycarbonate glass panels to add architectural interest to the building. Lastly, metal screens have also been added to the top of the building to screen rooftop mechanical equipment. Overall, the design of the building enhances the overall visual quality of the site and meets the City's "360-degree" design standards. In addition to the proposed building, the applicant is also proposing a 5,625-square foot pump room and a 3,541-square foot electrical room to be located in proximity to the proposed building. The pump room will house cooling equipment necessary to cool the forging press. The electrical room will enclose existing transformers and electrical conduits necessary to service both the existing buildings onsite and the proposed expansion. The design of both buildings incorporates split-face masonry, blocks and will enhance the architectural quality of the building. The site continues to meet the City's Development Standards for parking, building heights and all associated setbacks. All the proposed buildings are located roughly at the center of the site and do not affect setbacks. The height of the proposed building will be lower than the 75-foot height limit for all industrial buildings. The heights of the electrical and pump rooms do not exceed 22 feet and are well below the 75-foot height limit. The floor area ratio is 0.44 and will be generally consistent with other industrial properties in the area. There is no maximum floor area ratio in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial District (MI/HI) per the Development Code. The number of parking spaces provided for the site is 271 spaces and will meet the 271 parking spaces required for the existing and proposed buildings. The site is currently deficient in landscaping. The total amount of onsite landscaped areas is 9%. This is below the 10% minimum landscaping requirement for the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District per the Development Code, However, the proposed buildings will be located over existing pavement areas and will not adversely impact the existing amount of landscaping. Furthermore, an additional 1,700 square feet of landscaping is proposed along the Arrow Highway frontage to provide additional screening for the site and bring the site closer to compliance. AB52 Tribal Consultation: In accordance with AB52, staff contacted the San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians, the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians to determine interest in engaging in consultation related to the potential impact to cultural resources as result of the project. The E1—Pg 3 i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2017-00141 — J.R. MILLER &ASSOCIATES March 28, 2018 Page 4 San Manuel Band of Mission Indians contacted the City via email (dated January 17, 2018) and declined the invitation to consult on the project. Staff received no comments from the other tribes. B. Design Committee Review: The project was presented to the Technical Review Committee and the Design Review Committee on February 6, 2018. Both Committees accepted the design of the project as proposed without revisions. The Design Review Committee recommended that the project be move forward to the Planning Commission for review (Exhibit K). C. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. CEQA Guidelines require that the Initial Study review 18 separate environmental factors, ranging from aesthetics to utilities/service systems, where the project may have an impact on the environment. CEQA Guidelines also require that the cumulative impacts when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects be evaluated. The Initial Study for the proposed project concludes that the proposed project would have no impacts to the City's aesthetics, agricultural and mineral resources, biological resources, recreational resources, public services, traffic conditions, housing, or to existing land use policies. The Initial Study does find that there would be less than significant impacts to utilities/service systems, and less than significant with mitigation incorporated impacts to air quality, cultural and tribal resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards &waste materials, noise, water quality and cumulative effects. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that with the inclusion of mitigation measures any potentially significant impacts would be mitigated to less than significant. A Mitigation Monitoring Program had also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. Based on preparation of the Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Staff has not received any comments from the public to date. FISCAL IMPACT: The project proponent will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The types of services that these impact fees would support include library services, transportation, infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the parcels will be assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The addition of manufacturing and warehousing capacity at this location will also increase the number of jobs in the City, creating income for residents and supporting a retail sector generating sales tax in other parts of the City. E;1--Pg 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2017-00141 —J.R. MILLER &ASSOCIATES March 28, 2018 Page 5 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: MID AND LONG RANGE PLANNING One of the City's Council goals is to revitalize underutilized areas and enhance industrial land uses. The proposed industrial buildings will help the existing industrial site to operate more efficiently and to expand manufacturing capacity to meet the needs of its customers. Approval of the proposed building will also permit the area to continue to develop as a Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MIIHI) District as specified in the Development Code. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Site Aerial Photograph Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit F - Floor Plans Exhibit G - Roof Plans Exhibit H - Building Sections Exhibit I - Building Elevations Exhibit J - Landscape Plan Exhibit K - Design Review Committee Action Comments (February 6, 2018) Exhibit L - Initial Study Part I, 11 & III Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2017-00141 i CB:DT/Is El—Pg 5 This page intentionally left blank E1--Pg 6 nsii 9��/ P �" �✓ /i r q /� 'D �, t fir r��"�"�r � r ✓ / Vit, �u i d yr��ri�r��'.�y✓i°/r l ��k1 r�� `"; „"n,„� ;; �l�� i �/U U1 i✓'/✓ 1� I r.✓FGrlr"Fr,-',"r ti r i rr F r r J i' � � ,,,m° ,, ,; ,', � '" r 4 wnM M H rr r 1 ry rl i �; ��f„ Jr/Y �� %f✓rr y ��1 f�/�'/�y �yti>�j r ��r�rg ��/�r, r'/r✓�i� r r I! r�/i ✓lir/ �`"' � ✓ ylrrl r yyy/ �� . r / p b/r r/r� r/ rl//��lyyi 7 it qJ/ r Array" », '�" r;l� � •r/,,,,, r/✓eti�, row �:� , r/ /r` %' ' �' !r�rww � w r rr?'✓/ /rbr)9 r l��N xa at�rr� i ��a tr,lhj`1i 1!`�i: r �� '� ', ii"�..,� Vii" I'rP '�� f I, '✓r?I ��/�ir�/%�/�/r I��l�j � r �1��! i-. � /%/tri, � �' N/`' / N�/ f/✓ °a +r � � , jr/r�//'�l r r~x �� FAQ��fl In1'✓I,✓J�',l�'%far � " ��/ w� � ' 1N'r � ��✓,/rr� ;; ��rlyl��ii0�l�i��iii �///r r r 1 1�.�� r �� rvi am 1�;� ,rr ��/�� li V�� d�� Y4 rrr✓ik ,�r i r • /y i ,,,,,..,„.J. � 1rr/r1u�/dU/1 0✓l/,//a r �/�/ //✓r�/ r/l��ffrt �yir��r r�l��kr ✓i�h til /{ �" � r /� Fier x l 1/ ✓�% r � �lil � % '° ✓jy �/✓�//r�/l��l/o�/J�f ri/ �i�/�61��j �'� r ��G � "�✓ �� {'� ,' y.rid F��i.�,��✓�l��lr�� d;�T�'°% r rr � /i'r rr�� rel r r �✓�y or lyyF/r r';� �y / f w XHIBMT w,r �r ,r 1 r� y r a � Iia i Q) ,N r o � EXHIBIT B E I`^1'( 8 G1CZ'9L'OL-Tviuvjens2d`JNINN%nd Q;N17151A3H103roYd 62 U Z p}p} S� j2 9 5 U IJEa wQr� a 1;r° OM EL 7� } a - ° kala Q LL y ll' is 5 I � 7 3 2g LU [� i1 I cA p-hg,z`� 1_ � y di J `•" _ t � 4i�aVr*e�a 'I�� '} F,L ,h } �v a ^L s aa• �j' _ a r H a 1 a•3 4 x 7 J x i. re r° �4 6"�", � 1�+.''.]�d 1� d J i• i � 3y Z o J {/;J 7 yY,l, k t d IirF- LU d 1 XPi�+•t k l� +r I ' f +iv s a�. .y�!° d ''g� I lvalr.V1 �5>Y�' ux as r I k . fi t;N . rosy x� dr , rt b� R4CN $T£[�YgVE?. � al 9t,[ a��w.`a� .d ��l a , j x '.i irT ¢ 9 �'lr`9� { ' b�� _��° 7 - `4Y rf_d'Y fi:,ti 3k,� �,•ss� Fr ; � � AV Sr' q�IY N,k v hk A Ee I la ;gr; t< aiL@ -�F Li a t,E 9�s I r41 h t�' 3Y �`�"h��.''f � �d r ,f��' , t�' S�✓ �v p� � °r .�i � r�'s� .S, t S,ta�kfr".�y9� Jj� �ih� � 4 j �4q'L Pi f-t' a4r - i '� `�a •` t, " fr� -�a z 1.;. ;Ey 5Q A sl-.. �.a• v r k - �. "�31Ejv t z d T f� u i F{ r `Iii �[8r s y ca- - ��r Av'vvr., .a �I � -*pGSS'" s } - 1F i'�j� Yn .,�. rksk n�'_4__._I I 114 'kgs. ;>< E �• ,w ,z>I �,.R {rb TTS;ty,r��a,��'.. e F4c69 � J �'E�F6 ,d: I }Y W' �q� r � ��g }f1 eE•� �� 3f5 S' aY r-3 r IST h kF 'f` .aa j f 6 Y Y ��`rlry z�4� q 1 t a �� , �.�"1 lti.1 A@ '�' �1 i � fi } vr•z L �x V° a �� y}• e! ri l .4F rs ;s:e (,S � ' �e`Q• lip• ch,-y x ;� � �, � ks' � �aX,Ywr rids x n"a4i�'Y� �ts'p�."`i.}s.� - � � d�,f. ..,•7 �- NMI ri ku�t`� A - #� IiU$`.60N '!� 411"0 __0. " at.tir� rA �.��ty !,➢ �i � r'� ' k ��"' M"bt ti��".v,sv" � '1;' ��•,�';.r. S3 .i�r, s-# F� __ }.�� II�� #" -•,.` l �,- � ;�,£Y s>' rt'+w:�:�--�, -s;A�A`�y. .SA`�}}.'�f{v"�,, r As � n M1 kAa r' 3 EXHIBIT C -Pg LIOL"dZit 1viiinans3H ONINNVIa O:WOISIA3H1a3roiid i cap Y O 3�y a W tt Ku cc Wz G � ! t� !' U) IL ti i'a A 0 Z LU x 4§ c rt m !9 LU 111111, 1. Y a � r i OO000 a � 3x $ 6 J I 7 Z OJ. I3 + I v a. -F}�.,,,rj sa cmlf 'Nvf ` 5As F I t. , J I I j t z a _..rls I . i. r, T k t 41fd �! az x f 1r 1 4ju - cE ,F� i E I a 'I' 4,1 ..d 7 r i r- ON M2 s Sm a• I ,a i i I EI' i 'I Js ty� I a` E S)- R 1 Ci i i •.r 1 M 9R ;f I C' U'A l7 'YF Y i > 0 0 0 " ll �2�1 k n` Iyr yy�P j° 41 2 > O o O �rynIIII ii i i ^� - i 5 0 O O D I `' - 'T -_--•:_— -n I` .{ to 11 �_-�•—�� r�i1QE� __ •—T— ' 3 EXHIBIT D EZ--Pg 10 41 _��:= I 1 �- ,-�r:r-.xj�e'es.�.-¢ �'rs., �-.r � .u-- N.C"�'-s 4^ _.�._. gym.• _ - r �-.�f� u-# i� — p b 1 It 4; CD L t -11, Ott 10 l 1� ''j? �'�_'s � 1 � � �` h {`-, { I � 317 � ; � "•� `�. � ! � � �" �� LV IV L4 I It pj oipppl T 7 r Cv, .j, 11P I' � I �r,,' �� .I :I I y o � � ' 1 IIIu — �--�1 i •--- -- - ___ Fe~ co all, al .A ',� 31 c� Viz^ - —',''.. j � f,'`' g� .. , ..,9 r i��s _�, i; ''E ilk I G � : 71 all 017 jk is 71 -------- -- ------ 2-7......... — .!LP,. -------- ------- --- - 1.1 y- !M2 all, 10 lit IIrII�'1 ' ,.,.sl;LE4_'._�1- f -r m j l III�':�'r � -�'� �`_ � i 1� � ® " -99mommmmes gag 9 IV; oil- Ai. _l Z7 EXHIBIT EN, El—Pg 11 i qtf 6'1%1 Ll IV MN RJ"'Nfl'OIV H NIJIGG'P4 1-,01�d 14 HUM tl 7,rr RA iZ, 1141* .. uj .. so Bot .. .. ... P7 jpa 4 g 4'1 Oly ff nRAIo ............... 10, 1,41 �MA tA .......... ju 14........ LU r, EXHIB, T El. Pg-12 Lwz,zz'LL-tv imsnS3M°JNINNVId ',V:NOISVt3dl33rONd I�h! o n ii I t7 41 So lf�� z i I; g r LU V N �s ;76 ON 0: EE �$3 its oa G O6 �\ 0 I— zCt-1 E t e -3 -Y Q � g Y6 a@@ __________ __ � I w ol 0 0 0 O Lij I IL i I i 3' '3 I I I I i• I I J J- 1 -p f7 MUM j l r- -- -- I i I o- `L t-..--.--- EXHIBIT I I L—J _ g 13 Lon li-Yd11wans3i19NSNNYld VNOISN31!173rMld ED ca ui N T1 4 r a I -j �' I H a a aai i I 1 1 4 • I I I I 1 1 r cl �t EXHIBIT H 'IV,1 411VI(r N UhR'JC"Y kI YV�['rI/h 164 C,,91 FII r� uj t f � yyyp f j� ( 7 G1 G5 ! LU tld.I ,wy° ° ° p r I� M � / LU � r LU r Jar W w UA 44 w /r Jyil ! ii rown �, 0 d � us i r ! y rii/ J i fJf%� ( r u^ 7 1 riu11 D w r I ( ' p/r i wyY I i T; I / Al,/ie, 1 lrb r/rr r / y IV //i 1 1411 Ia , �XHI IT E1-Pg 1 MOZ'teloF(1++3SuNINNY1dlYN13 Q 1NOISIA3H 103fOLld ul UZin co 14 LU z e LU _j g a 1' �� P ° tl O ! s � E LU uj O P j i 7 V g1 3 V `• a I ' F � � �0000000000 g t I I It s'I �tr1^t! -;,ri ° ,v♦ itf c ,�i��^0.� »�d � i $ z d S . t t tai a� m V Xifi �Y 4 W ] i ;Zfri 1... ` 2 a 0 J r. �aR I s .�.'r, e f:,'e`'•xt � i� '�&l r r��. 145 �'�yr � 1 'Al r, Jr i rT �"r .: !k,Z 4` y� � { ,l I � I � i7' � rr� �• I ��tate� r.. �� k s�7�ir� t� I ; F l k f1 CC ♦ 4 '� t T Y LI � P b r• , I i ! � k �l• \�� h }q t_ 1, t V r I I.I t", p $8 ,. )Wk,11 l w� 'i r�' .{`fid,i� "l,.tr• _fFG!'` �. t i�� } " •` fit r�k p L...r lk'I�agm 4' }r r�'ca q�i,r��Sma {{'+ p $. I5�F. - k. i i :1 Y .• � ,yrs. 'rye I�f ro1T' I �a�Ir ! { Y.� ' �3 �f ]� � ,� F _____—- 1 I 16 � v � h-1-" f y '',\ 1 � �- FY • ��tttp'^ =3�'�!Y��it��L ,t r yV�rt't{:�Y�•t ��t$�I+ 1 I' r y ,� Z S � i � k' ay. � s ♦ t:'t.vlt`iaY.� �brA .t�� d.xl,�,sx�' w,;. k3.�""1�'.�.. � ♦ ♦ LL ' 1 ♦\ w co I i y' � \ .. ��M .�' PrG.1_ri1 c stn f .h� r n F�t,�t � �_ -J t &r- I ♦ P 3 k". d' fS 241 k I i q t Y T�Fa �rl�r �1R5�� P fue rr { Ila + Yf, I + r•r W a k 7'¢+j ,a y-3 Ot#rVlil, e4V, O 5 grit s tq rcgva'_.F d i.v'1i t�W d:5�kS.,n fid.Kkc � t ) 'pyv i I •♦�� Q i llyppSi Yf p X T' `�``' 1 \ \ , 1 f:,•.rlj{+p-K `rliMi�F• w6E f # 'flr!ct3 ❑ 1 I `♦�• x 1 7,&L. t '1 1 1.. 3 +t4 11 r�� r= 5 Q 3 nr R' 63 s ydt t s � gjI {a,� y ��SIY?ZL � n rr3�� IFv�' r 1 4rS it x. i I .♦♦� Li 5 IS . Mi agtir . .tikl 'n,. ' „�xa5 . t4a+�Y!„ ` I s `\ \\`♦ _ t,z 'Via•. .�� v 9 �� - ; I ; I li`.x` • 111 \ � � i I ♦.♦.,♦; I _ + .f ;:hl q - t>� rt 4 ry r,1w� -,y t� 1 ` • ♦ ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ i � Z C� �s��o }`;''t'!Sq{' Jn ¢:.r H �r k;, r s%{.,.{`.,,,ti .a , i 1 \♦♦♦ L♦♦ ♦ `� ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦♦♦♦ ♦ ♦ F� � .i', t., III yy 44 fm , rr I EXHIBIT J - - ' _- F1-Pg 16 L f DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Dat Tran February 6, 2018 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00141 — J.R. MILLER & ASSOCIATES — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 39,600-square foot industrial building, and two ancillary equipment buildings totaling 9,166 square feet on an existing industrial site totaling 17.5 acres of land, located in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/Hl) District south of Arrow Route and west of Rochester Avenue; APN: 0229-111-74 and 75. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration per State CEQA Guidelines for consideration of environmental impacts. Site and Surrounding Land Uses: The project site is within the Minimum impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District. The project site is located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue. The site to the north of the project site, on the opposite side of Arrow Route, is zoned General Industrial (GI) and currently consists of the Rancho Cucamonga Adults Sports Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care & Adoption Center. The site to the east of the project site, on the opposite side of Rochester Avenue, is zoned General Industrial (GI) and consists of large industrial and warehousing facilities similar in scale to the project site. The sites to the south and west of the project site are located in the Medium Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District and also consists of large industrial and warehousing facilities similar in scale to the project site. Pro'ect Overview: The applicant is proposing to construct a 39,600-square foot industrial building on an existing industrial site totaling 17.5 acres of land. The site currently has a total of seven industrial buildings onsite, totaling 53,007 square feet of manufacturing and 264,355 square feet of warehouse space. The site also has an office and administration building consisting of 16,500 square feet of office space. The proposed 39,600-square foot building will consist of 14,276 square feet of manufacturing space and 25,324 square feet of warehousing space. it will have an overall height of 73 feet. The building will house up to 14 industrial furnaces and a new forging press to complement existing production onsite. The building will be located roughly at the center of the site and is surrounded by existing industrial buildings similar in scale and size. However, the building will be visible from both Arrow Route, Rochester Avenue and from adjacent sites along the south and west property lines because of its overall height. The exterior of the building has been designed to consist of visually-interesting facades viewable from all vantage points. The design incorporates the use of metal wall panels with alternating vertical flutes to break up the expansive blank fagade. The structure also incorporates the use of metal projections and polycarbonate glass panels to add architectural interest to the building. Lastly, metal screens have also been added to the top of the building to screen rooftop mechanical equipment. Overall, the design of the building enhances the overall visual quality of the site and meets the City's "3607degree" design standards. In addition to the proposed building, the applicant is also proposing a 5,625-square foot pump room and a 3,541-square foot electrical room to be located in proximity to the EXHIBIT K E1—Pg 17 DRC COMMENTS 0 0 DRC2017-00141 --J.R. MILLER &ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 6, 2018 Page 2 proposed building. The pump room will house cooling equipment necessary to cool the forging press. The electrical room will enclose existing transformers and electrical conduits necessary to service both the existing buildings onsite and the proposed expansion. The design of both buildings incorporate split-face masonry blocks and will enhance the architectural quality of the building. The site continues to meet the City's Development Standards for parking, building heights and all associated setbacks. All the proposed buildings are located roughly at the center of the site and do not affect setbacks. The height of the proposed building will be lower than the 75-foot height limit for all industrial buildings. The heights of the electrical and pump rooms do not exceed 22 feet and are well below the 75-foot height limit. The floor area ratio is 0.44 and will be generally consistent with other industrial properties in the area. There is no maximum floor area ratio in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial District (MI/HI) per the Development Code. The number of parking spaces provided for the site is 271 spaces and will meet the 271 parking spaces required for the existing and proposed buildings. The site is currently deficient in landscaping. The total amount of onsite landscaped areas is 9%. This is below the 10% minimum landscaping requirement for the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MIIHI) District per the Development Code. However, the proposed buildings will be located over existing pavement areas and will not impact landscaping. Staff Comments: Maior Issues: 1. None. Staff supports the proposed site layout and overall design of the proposed project. The project is well-integrated into the existing parcel. The buildings consist of visually-interesting fagades which meet the City's 360-degree design standards. The building fagade incorporates a variety of materials and architectural features, including polycarbonate glass panel, metal sales and vertical flutes, thereby meeting the City's design standards for industrial developments. Adequate parking is provided onsite for the proposed building and landscaping is maintained to adequately screen the site from the public right-of- way, reducing any visual impact upon public roadways. Secondary Issues: 1. None Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line- of-sight ine- ofsight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building. E1--pg 18 ............... .................. DRC COMMENTS DRC2017-00141 — J.R. MILLER & ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 6, 2018 Page 3 2. All ground-mounted equipment proposed, including utility boxes, transformers, and back-flow devices, shall be surrounded by a rninirnUrn of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on-center, All ground-mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department, 1 All dock doors shall be painted to match the main color of the building, Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review and action, Design Review Committee Action: Staff 1,:)resenled the pr'(Vect to nietribets of the Design Review corm"nittee, No corninents were raise(l at the trieetiog Rie project w,is approved as 1'Wesented and forwar(Jed to the f"lanning, Commission for cooshic,,ration, Staff Planner Dat 'rran, Assistant Planner Metribers Present: Gotninissionet, Ray Wimbed Coinafissioner Francisco Cha aca,, Seoior FlIannet, y Donald (3r,,'inger Addition al Staff Present" Dat Trao, Assisctcv)t I'llanner El—Pg 19 1 7 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) RANCHO (Please type or print clearly using Ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line) CUCAMONGA Planning Department (909)477-2750 pr Th"' - aSdbfthig-� "'t f W aq4i;006696pi) q�,Jq 04,proposed d"; ,.,project Ua0tWCKY-PA '0 -11" inancesi J,p 1clesiJI-irc an Guidelines,, the. _California --En V1ronhent iI -QUAIitY' Ad"t'. vtfid'�' Cq jt.an ' 6 , ' Implement 10EQA :It isim _6dintlk ma ion;reqU69ted-ih*,thls-,' qpP !gal.ion'!be, 'p-r'o'vi.ddd'iih,� U - A 'on..- U d p-plipag Up xeVid*�'W'Ahe- -Wli 11 $t gatt,, Ah 6ibloompht, r. v r�.v' "A' "WilitioHM-16f 6—rmatfonsuid-h�-a's' u-tin"M m" and,;, 11catidn Will mtfie deemed complete. ' "d' 'iiJ6& - e.jgeo1o9jcaQ606rt!§pa- b' "' ftd'.-'.Th6 k'0.r4j6&t dp -.1 1 y; e.requi , 0 qw�an Jag., srepo siaresulim" I t'dd:foe,,LY6.v j. -'n"kj 1:�-'J.'%T,'�j �J�-t 4 P—1 rYlll 4.- -e *a. 3"�4 Cappli,6 i 6 ni", 111111fibf lcepted as et an adequate' 46'riC6 ffill& "F01 _p.oMp,,,e qua c 4,4 :i�WVWW,UW"t all 46qLflrdd,'.reports' --- Jtfi'& d'�d ,-areisu mi e A'an egm `C A-Al •fi"Ladd�11ifidKI&I ,p,r.epare-. theanitial{Study, - , Ateagents,-- .' '7-r J o r.,.,* "will 06- .- ,,.officers,JiRd!"� Y consultants for,$all, costs for e ioni,,:tev[eWjk i-an a ysis;,�Yrecommendations,� f4 'N' wq- mitigations, etc ,sof hftpedidl�,-!§tu les,orprept AA '115 GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal, City staff will not be available to Perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: DRC2017-00141 Project Title. Arconic Forging Facility Project Name&.Address of project owner(s): Christopher Grafton, Director of Operations AFSR/Schlosser Forge Company, Rancho Cucamonga Operations 11711 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor Christopher Grafton, Director of Operations AFSR/Schlosser Forge Company, Rancho Cucamonga Operations 7 11171,11 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 EXHIBIT L Page 1 of 10 E1--Pg 20 Contact Person&Address: Christopher Gratton, Director of Operations AFSRISchlosser Forge Company, Rancho Cucamonga Operations 11711 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name&Address of person preparing this form(if different from.above): 1 Shudelsh Mahadev, Ph.D, Director of Environmental Compliance Sapphos Environmental, Inc. 430 N Halstead St. Pasadena, CA 91107 Telephone Number. (626)683-3547 ext. 141 3 PROJECT ■ INFORMATION DESCRIPTION f..3 Information indicated by an asterisk(*)is not required of non-construction CUP s unless otherwise requested by staff. ; i1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 1.1) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. ; ] 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north,.south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant t I features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): 11711 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga in the Guasti USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle. The location is North of Interstate 10, South of State Highway 210, North of Jersey Boulevard, West of Rochester Avenue and Interstate 15, South of Arrow Route, and East of Milliken Avenue. 4 Assessor's Parcel Numbers attach additional sheet if necessary): ', APN 0229-111-74 and APN 0229-111-75 *5) Gross Site Area(ac/sq.ft.): 12.28 acres *6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed dedications): 12.28 acres EA There are no public streets or public dedications located on the proposed project site: .; 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site F (attach additional sheet if necessary): Please see attached addendum L� { Updated 4/1112013 Page 2 of 10 E1—Pg 21 ] 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovernmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: ] Please see attached addendum ] 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography,soil stability, ] plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features ] described. In addition, cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological and/or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): ] Please see attached addendum ] ] Updated 4/19/2013 Page 3 of 10 J , E1—Pg 22 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources ofinformation(books,published reports and oral history): Please see attached addendum 1. . { v 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadwaynoise,etc.)and how they will affect rr proposed uses: L. Please see attached addendum 1 i I L 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of _J development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary. { s Please see attached addendum Q., ..y 4 j �i G.. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,historical, or scenic it aspects. indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity ofland use(one-family,apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height,frontage,setback,rear yard, etc.): Please see attached addendum L] L i Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 t E1-Pg 23 _ y 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? J 7 Please see attached addendum _1 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? ] Please see attached addendum `16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees. ] Please see attached addendum ] 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains. ] Please see attached addendum 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909) 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) Peak use(gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/ 210,203 day/ac} Peak use(gaUmin/ac) 245.974 ] 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. [] Septic Tank Q Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate ] expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). Forfurther clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909) 987-2591. ] a. Residential(gal/day) b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) 3011 —' Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 El—Pg 24 s RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: i 20) Number of residential units: t Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: g I i 1 Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: e Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent(per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: i 3. . 'L L 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: s } c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: Please see attached addendum -' r ' c Updated 4/1112013 Page 6 of 10 El—Pg 25 26) Total floor area of commercial,Industrial, or institutional uses by type: Please see attached addendum 27) Indicate hours of operation: Please see attached addendum 28) Number of employees: Total:Please see attached addendum Maximum Shift: please see attached addendum Time of Maximum Shift: Please see attached addendum 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications,including wage and salaryranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each cfassification(attach additional sheet if necessary): Please see attached addendum 30) Estimation ofthe number of workers to be hired that currently reside In the City:Please see attached addendum '31) For commercial and Industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District,at(818)572-6283): Please see attached addendum .ALL PROJECTS 32) Nave the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determinetheir ability toprovide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. Please see attached addendum Updated 4/11/2013 Page 7 of 10 E±1--Pg 26 33) in the known history of this property,has there boon any use,storage,or discharge of hazardous arrdlor toxic materials? Examples of hazardous end/ortoxic materiels Include,but are not limited to PC8 s;radloactiva substances,pesticides and herbickles,fuels,oils,solvents,and otherflammerblo liquids and gases, Also nota underground storage of any ofthe above, Please 11st the materials and describe their use,storage, andlor discharge on the property,as well as the dales of use,it known. Please see attached addendum i 34) Wi111hapmpasedprojectinvolvethe tomporaryorlong-term use,storage,ordischargeafhazardousandlartaxlcmaterials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to ba used and proposed mwthad of disposal. The location ofsuch uses,along with the storage and shipment areas,shall be shown and labeled on the uppikation plans. Please sea attached addendum Q Q Q 35) The applicant shall be squired to pay any applicable Fish and Garne fee, The pmfact planner will conlrrm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisars and submitted to the Planning CommisslonlAlanning Director hoering; Q f hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached oxhlblts present the data and Information required for i adequate evaluation of this prujact to the best ofmy ability,that the facts,statements,and thfommellon presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and bellef. 1 further understand that additional fnfarmatlon maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: 2 ,00 20 1'3" Slgnatune: Q rifle: Christopher Gratton, Director of Operations p Q Q Q Q Q . Q Q Updated 4/1112013 Page 8 of 10 �F t" El—Pg 27 r ATTACHMENT "A" ] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day ] Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day ] Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) ] Industrial Park 1750 galldaylunit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) ] ] Sewer Flows -� Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day ] Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day ] General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government ] Industrial Park 3000 galldaylacre ] Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre J Source: Cucamonga Valley Wafer District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 J Updated 4111/2013 Page 9 of 10 E1—Pg 28 1 f ATTACHMENT B 1 3 Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma s 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F t Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central # J 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 - F (909)989-8541 E . Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 ( ' Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 ' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 L 3 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 rL.Z i.._i 3 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 10 of 10 El—Pg 29 ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (PART I - INITIAL STUDY) 1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION Application Number DRC2 017-00141 Project Title Project Titan Name and Address of Project Owner Kari Guy Sourcing Manager Central Capital f1rocurenient Arconic 201 Isabella Street Pittsburgh, PA 15212 a. 1 412 553 3126 Office 1 202 270 8398 Mobile Arconic.corn Name and Address of Developer or Project Sponsor Kari Guy Sourcing Manager Central Capital Procurement Arconic 201 Isabella Street Pittsburgh, PA 15212 A- 1 412 553 3126 Office 4- 1 202 270 8398 Mobile Arconic.corni an-,pnic,(X.,m) Contact Person & Address Andy Blanda Senior Project Manager Arconic 201 Isabella Street Pittsburgh, PA 15212 onkxorll (860) 970-41'15 ............ -_-------- .......... Alcoa/Arconic Project Titin Add(,,�ndurn to Environmental Information Form Wart I initial Study) J�rly 27, 2017 SapphoEnvironmental, fric Page I E 1—Pg 30 i Name and Address of Person Preparing This Form Shudeish Mahadev, PhD 1 Director of Environmental Compliance Sapphos Environmental, Inc. , 430 North Halstead Street Pasadena, CA 91107 4 . 1.2 PROJECT INFORMATION AND DESCRIPTION f ' i I Provide a full'scale (8-112 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. See attached Figure 1, Project Location Map. i 2 Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. s See attached Figure 2, Representative Views of and from Project Site, and Figure 3, Map Showing Location of,Each Photograph. 3 Project Location (description) The project would be located at 11711 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga in the Guasti USGS 7.5- minute topographic quadrangle. The location is north of Interstate 10, south of State Highway 210, north of Jersey Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue and Interstate 15, south of Arrow Route, and s east of Milliken Avenue. 4 Accessor Parcel Numbers , The project is located within two parcels: Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 0229-111-74 and APN r 0229-111-75. 1- 5 Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.) _ t The gross site area is 12.28 acres. Please see attached Figure 4, Project Layout. b Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets &proposed dedications) 1 The Net Site Area is 12.28 acres.There are no public streets or public dedications located on the ' proposed project site. Please see attached Figure 4, Project Layout. 7 Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary). This is not applicable. The proposed project would not require a general plan amendment or zone change. ' AlcoalArconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form(Part I Initial Study) July 27, 2017 Sapphos Environmental Inc. t Page 2 El—Pg 31 I LEGEND � , Ctl AMC)hdGA � /�MM�■ Cr� '�Mr�MMM► i�.',;,,.�✓ri„ia, „� -�a��o ,,,,,irrr�i,ri�ru.;i�r�;,� Ia�o/r� ''„r � ��, J,''�wf�r6� N! � s()SGS 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Indr,x tlf za,�an pd 04%�l B 'Y`anzmll"Lu M 01,4 ” Cucamonga ,pplan41 r n � a a R PROJECT 1 SITE r�, r k 4o,Y,,Y N4 d, GUASTI e, ! �a �- OvONTi R10 �,,,.,,,�: irr/i/��iF✓✓✓r of eotmtrnia t�<a✓air✓rr„ a�cni„n�, iii�ivire�n.,,in„o°✓iUei 6 ”,r�,Rmnii�ar„ii�iaui✓ar�i�Uii�r✓�1uD r✓rir x ;mar�— ¢,,,,cry l�`C�Ctid'Cri4�1�t v � 4 u, f pY� r f tl 1 '��Jku�,rvarrae,i�c rraarnmu�u r��,9�a>�ui� ,��xuurar�u✓��+ru�e�rrrr��ww�ia�r�r�rrr& r �dwe ��n��„ a� C M 14 %,aVn u,r '1118„fiwa � � �°A��✓�V�mi�yJ�i�7Ai�a8l�ra�rrma¢��+uvtiarrrr��✓ura� nu�,mar��rr��aw�V�r��gtr, , m C bi e/mY P46'a t CORONA SC�6,�i�CE�` EI,ESR PRADO p” N RTH 1 DAM 0 0.7 1.Qr Eaal;� IMMMM.._ healla*s ., `✓ ' , 1:90,000 &rr aFr e„b' &'tv,�,r r,ta a rat-- 1 ,�� ? 9�,`NW'r,nr�,@d.bd'"Y&'I�k'1-oAdu h✓ I ;a'VAwYtl'Mv.akWF'f�4,_P'rr�wwkNu+um.areu.xrcl FIGURE 1 Project Location Mar.) El—Pg 2 r r r � A r r , Ilk ff i, a; yr J m Y�r� ll ryr J 1 � r r ..„.... ...,......,.a.,.......-....®_ms.....µ El- Pg 33 `E JY f " /% �✓'/,� � it�/r��/ /�r�a ! IF�� 1 / r i a� o/J l E1-Pg 34 to Pr A, 40, R V,Y, A A )P�' T V'fl'��'Al - Vyl� IN a lit"I'A A 'Z ff A lurrI"Al ""'L 'M I'NO 6, PIt ,ZJ ij my, f P� 'n aa El-Pg 35 i p..» •fa I '� rti au r r ;i n � � f i ^a a � r r in ambo ;i ��r 1�r✓'°/l��y//1��`�il ice, °: G; °- rm { , a %r tr y � LL as � a rJ ra v r r J; i f /l l ,W 16 l/�RA l r El-Pg 37 0a 0 ,5 0 CL CL L E w� wr; WYwry"pq yµµypIq � hl 4 P i o Iqu II 1..4�h1' CZ Sa -Al ;. r i i I r� I i r I' � 11111 I ........... 05 z CL re, wJ rr .W.............. ........... El-Pg 39 . ... P�dD ria nrxrcrrrw�rrarrecV � 1 P�Te e Praiare I; e �� F kc°oo Point /r 4md rich l�riitrifia " , o , �+ 6 r �ert``�rtoParcels �4 drra irtis�rrri,irrra b w, r " � 11ur"ltPPrr�Cr' ;lidurl`afiarr��5/�1 I Burlrlira d "i r r�17` � I� I f, r�r N if r I I I I �r*rs�y 1Elve�t 0 C') 125 250 u ) Feel 1:3,(100 1 >z „gar.. ,,r1,),.,✓r „e/,1,/�J l ,,r /�J' �,.e�C( rs;��r� qq�� F��t�� 1�" ri�zi�s .��aa a��,��ri FIGURE i law Map Showing Location of EK1(l: i Photograph E 1--Pg 40 u I I iY 1 chi ��7 LU --------- 0 At!k Yv � 9 1 55kk VYr 'E �0 '�,ry H b I{ x t / 'r 1 �� r u �y". .W...�..'I a sf/ � l✓ 1. "/ � w F 9p ,,. } ;:'�..� fill 8 V4pd r f !' •o� .,,�,.,,. 'gym " 4a 1 �l ,.,,..,....W.. ........... 111 4 0 Y _ A P .a 4 1-777' uFV ' ~ E1--P41 8 Include a description of all permits which would be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project. The following permits would be required: • South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) permits to construct and operate the seven natural gas furnaces. The permit to construct application has already been filed with the SCAQMD. • Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) revision. • Building permit. • Grading permit. There would be no NPDES permit involved as Arconic discharges to a Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) through their pre-treatment plant. Arconic would permit the increased water flow expected from the cooling tower blowdown through the pre-treatment water permit issued by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency. This permit is currently due for renewal and Arconic is actively working on the renewal permit application. 9 Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The current project site is part of a 12.28-acre industrial complex with associated improvements. The existing Arconic complex consists of six preengineered metal buildings (PEMBs) and one administration office, along with one minor outbuilding located at the northeast corner of the property. Older buildings located to the far west of the site, and the larger forging buildings in the center, with smaller and more linear buildings placed around the north, east, and south perimeter. The main entrance lies at the north, along the Arrow Route (see Figures 5 and 6, Existing Physical Setting of Project Site and Surroundings), as a driveway adjacent to the Administration Office Building. The property is largely fiat and surrounded on two sides--south and west—by additional industriallcommercial parcels, while the east and north sides face public streets. A drainage area crosses the full length of the southern perimeter of the property. The project site is relatively flat at an elevation of 1,165 feet above mean sea level.' J ' Elevation Map.Accessed 12 June 2017.Available at:http://elevationmap.net/l 171 1-arrow-route-rancho-cucamonga-ca- 91730-usa?latings—(34.098058;117.549282) `J AlcoalArconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form(Part 1 Initial Study) July 27, 2017 Sapphos Environmental, Inc. Page 3 E1–Pg 42 i ✓ ✓r0 n✓�rr�; ��,�m ��F a � I ✓ 0�1,"fir �:,, ,, LEGEND P5a rrrnrxrNk tTrrp � flt wmm /r �,° A l f T P �.r�aOn, / S;iv�fcf��bu'rPcfatrr %, 1✓ s ri, r hea{ecasite 1 arcr.l, ✓1��✓'d��r�JP�`' !�y�I�SCf ✓ ffillmAl i li✓ }"" '/f r/e1 K,r !� „y Irl �r�/�,1 ilii /�/u"�/(f�l' 1✓r✓? r��/�I � �lmar�Ps d r�rre>w l��kr� "� ry / �r�� t, �'I7�/r�i��r l✓ (:7��it I F ��/ / � �,;�/'l�' T ' u it r/r� f%f � �//��I�/J��lariur� � r ✓ r% 1 r r� ✓'�'"'"?rIj"9"�^�'�D�rCA�IA�'! t�+� � �HvJr��/� r .�. i/�ar �I lG 1 �r �/i d 1/�� /�✓uri t// � t s, r/ ktc�rfddn�,2 ✓,:ry ...•�,N;� �� '�r/�i��, /;/ �°f,�r r 1, I rf �X 1 I ri f wl✓err I d hrr 1� ei, � °�i /i � 1 ,�/ f/ir�>';Yy?p�'r iyr�✓^i/rri/� I"�rN� Vr l' Y�:J✓1 r r/I,%P T/7 I� %gyp rl r / r r f � t✓f�1 r /, �// �irr9) � ri 6 `� fy /��'� it rhe a � �I� % ✓9 ,r�r� �, �h �R I/ii/lir ;,5 r 6 W ,y� , ,y i/�'ti r � � ✓ r ✓, /�%r / r/� r I /r�� rt/,�, r /p j au � �if�//`'��,k � � ',y✓"�'�hk r,�G,, ms�!y , lf;rl � � ��✓ � tir ir7ylt, ✓9 , .� / U r r f r l(„ ��. r B✓ i "Y11,69 �1j ✓l / $/'°r`/%I I '1 /% 1 I,'a ✓«i✓irpyai, r; a„ i rl ✓ � H il�l�i�%� lei��/r%�I I, �r✓�,`�l r/i, a�c'✓/�� i r �ir t �' I�� '� `�G��//r/ �y ��r� � ✓ r �1 /rid% ¢ G r r �� /."/,r,, i ,, rr,, // yell,�;.a�r F �,I � ii, lis r�✓��r��(E�ti�,.±l;��9Y �,�' rlr /�,�'yrl�a�� a�°hi°r r �,. �rr � /,; r/µgr i�er,� ��'. �,'�l.,�� /�/,��),Ir� ;fin+>;�b7�l�r��..�t�� I r�✓/II, ��riril�r�l�p(+'d ;r��/��_ til l, II,�,n' �„ii¢i!m!,��✓w; r Fr k f r� kya, � � ,</�r i� 1,.r,9 "^i��i / y�� r/ rl ��'; »'� 1 ,.. ''' / � %°r %�/,��;��r�9`,i i ��fi"��'�rr� ✓�r� ,l„r �i��/4r t�,�r,��r%y�� r � �< pp ( /�� iry� /�I� r s ,r"/ill(� '� /� ��r ✓i r /�/r /yf 2 /�t ,°7� � I ��',�, c; ^ i w MMIN ✓ u� r ✓ frtl r �. ff,��n�'' 1 ,. ,� ,�w 6, ..111/� I' r✓ �� r`up /�r r�ly^ 0 725 ascr r � rr I r/ 7i yr /r yr �i�i�i ti� 'l�r rrs(l d'A.r ;!,6 H i/ ✓ / z'/r / efN A r� IIv.�C yr ✓'�/�l?�r�i � � ��/r I l h«to i' e�i i rl; �� f4,'��Al eF ji� � / rl ru° /� i'✓�%"%� /t/� 1 � r 13,000 v �' �i 1r"� rr,Jil��z1j/�f�,,6 y�� %� 'b/'✓�� l/r/ 4 ✓�'x 1d'tT"�' fir,-„�r,:o- - ;; r/✓�;-,h,;:',,,,4,r,., �,, r �, ;�,I;Fy� 1 / � � i. r CgaW"rnr+�e1u' ��-a1 ;G!k,Af.:, . [in�ritix�l�iq FIGURE MAW Existing PhysicaIl Setting of Project Sita ar)cl SUr"r"(Wridin s E1—Pg 43 al c w' tk a_ C', all C �� //ibr 01, j �F✓ p ,ply �� YVI GR I r r a �` ld El—Pg 44 Et C13, a a r MIAMI rN f' r1 r r rr�� rrt i U �p� r � ' i, is �Y! ✓�y dp I 1 I c, rrr� l r i s � civ i✓/' w ✓ / %sn a / a a � s it —mom— El-Pg 1-Pg 45 unrff IA rm� 12) tt Ln irk'% l 1r 00 to �c �i co gglg ol td aj r m u � �ji r en � f Jar e r ra li/: r r� t. r � 'Al r �i r 1-Pg 46 ...... __ LW 5 x r r rta c r i r , i/INxi� �� 1/ mm/I' Rr 1 �l✓� 6 it �, �� Y � n hr�1Pil L p I P iii. win r , gg p, rm r, 1-Pg 47 /i�ffY II to //�r et %' ws %fir/i// r / / , W ✓>/;% / ._ 73 alv,, 15 " r�`r� i � I/ Il��i> vYar"„�w, i�� D ➢1'f/�" �;,, �! �i� c' / / I TAI > / � � t luplll r` til r N f rel„ h v T /ri r y �r�c l rWi `1 1 Z Geotechnical Setting A geotechnical investigation was conducted in 2016 at the project site, which determined that the subject site is situated along the northerly edge of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of Southern California just south of the San Gabriel Mountains. The site is underlain by 7 feet of soil, slag, and fire brick fill mixture overlying younger alluvium comprised of interbedded silty fine I sand, gravelly medium to coarse sand and sandy silt. The tipper, near-surface granular soils are non-expansive and do not require special consideration in design for the project. Groundwater was 4 not encountered in the exploratory boring at the time of drilling. The historic high groundwater depth in the area is below 50 feet. Groundwater will Rgt,tequire special consideration. ' The site is not located in a potential liquefaction hazard zone according to the city of Rancho . Cucamonga 2010 General plan update. The site is in a portion of California that is seismically active and anticipated to be subjected to strong ground motions by earthquakes generated by active faults in the area. The site is located approximately 9.2 km from the nearest active fault, the Cucamonga Fault, and 13.9 km from the San Jose Fault. The likelihood of surface rupture at the site is considered to to nil? c 1 . Site Drainage The proposed construction would consist of disturbing approximately 2.9 acres and adding an additional building with associated improvements on the property. The affected areas are split into three tributary areas: area "A" (7.55 acres), which surface drains and utilizes the existing storm drain system; area "B" (3.07 acres), which utilizes an existing four-foot wide PCC v-gutter; and area "C" (0.23 acres), which utilizes an existing two-foot wide PCC v-gutter_ All three areas are tributary to an existing PCC lined channel running along the southerly property line in an easterly direction. Due to the proposed building, area "A" would be split into two subareas and a proposed storm _s drain system would be added in the new area "A1" (3.11 acres), new area "A2" (4.28 acres) would utilize the existing storm drain system that has been rerouted for the new building, area "B" (3.12 acres) would utilize the existing four-foot wide PCC v-gutter and area "C" (0.35 acres) would utilizes a new three-foot wide PCC v-gutter. For water quality purposes, the low flows from areas "B," "C," and "D" would be treated. No detention is proposed since the proposed flow equals the existing flow. All proposed inlets and storm drain piping have been designed for a Q100 storm -' event, and emergency overflow drain patterns have been considered if drainage clogging should occur. Built Environment and Access There are no existing trails or roads on the project site. The project site can be accessed by three gated driveways: two driveways on either side of the Administration Building at Arrow Route and one driveway at Rochester Avenue in the northeastern portion of the project site (see Figure 2, Photos 2, 3, and 7). Fire lanes within the project site separate all of the existing buildings from each i- other except for the decommissioned AT&T telephone switch building. The majority of the project site is paved, with the exception of the northern border, which is lined with trees and includes a grass area bordering Building 6 to the west. The project site is ' .2 Harrington Harrington Geotechnical Engineering, Inc. 11 October 2016.Geotechnical Investigation for Design and Construction at ff Proposed Building 4'(Between Buildings 3 &4)at Schlosser Forge Company,11711 Arrow Route,Rancho Cucamonga, L. CA.HGEI Project No. 16-01-3500.Orange,CA. Alcoa/Arconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental information Form (Part 1 initial Study) l July 27, 2077 Sapphos Environmental, Inc. Page 4 i F1--Pg 49 J predominantly industrial in character, comprised of a fenced area (an asphalt-paved surface ] between existing buildings with landscaped planters adjacent to the off-site decommissioned AT&T Telephone Switch Building, Administration Building, Building 1, Building 2, and Building 6), as well as turf grass landscaped with ornamental trees and shrubs between the fenced area and the sidewalks along Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue. Landscaping is restricted to green space on ] either side of the main entrance to the complex, which features trees and lawn areas. ] The larger industrial buildings are laid out in a manner that has likely evolved organically, with the two older buildings located to the far west of the site, and the larger forging buildings in the center, ] with smaller and more linear buildings placed around the north, east, and south perimeter to provide support services such as shipping, grinding, and minor fabrication. The PEMDs are ] generally 1.5 to 2 stories tall, or approximately 24 to 58 feet in height, with shallow-pitched gabled roofs and steel framing. The chief character-defining feature of most of the primary buildings is a raised rooftop ridge ventilator design that both lets in light and allows for air circulation, and ] corrugated sheet metal cladding punctuated by tall and wide sliding bay doors. There are two architectural styles for the existing buildings on site: (1) The numbered buildings are all beige to brown colored matte-painted corrugated sheet metal pitched-roof buildings with continuous translucent plastic sheet clerestory windows ] at the roof and sometimes at the junction between walls and roof; and ] (2) The Administration Office Building and a few support structures are light brown concrete masonry unit structures with a Spanish Colonial-style the ceramic roof. The Administration Office Building is a two-story, approximately 31-foot-tall vaguely Spanish- interpretation of a modern office building, with a Spanish-tiled Mansard roof, stuccoed walls, and two-story-height vertical bands of fixed windows. Permit evidence suggests it was built in 1979. I ] ] Building 1 is a linear, shallow gable-roofed, steel-framed 1.5-story enclosure approximately 31 feet in height, with entrances centered at its gabled ends and along its sides. It runs from north to south ] and features a raised rooftop ridge ventilator and a roughly three-quarter-length long shed roofed extension on its west side that was added as an addition. Building 1's unique feature among the ] PEMDs is the louvered upper ventilator openings found at intervals along its sides. Building 1 is believed to have housed the earliest forge at the site, and its oldest portion (the northern half of the ] building) likely dates from sometime around or before 1970. The building is utilized for both _ manufacturing and warehousing. Building 2 is an attached grouping of three linear, shallow gable-roofed, steel-framed 1.5-story J enclosure approximately 58 feet in height, with entrances centered at their gabled ends and along their sides, each with its own raised rooftop ridge ventilator. This attached trio of warehouses runs ] from north to south and forms one-large-open space internally, but are constructed with individual, ] rather than shared, framing systems throughout. Two tall, projecting, enclosed entrance bays are each located on both side in addition to the standard bay door openings. This building dates from ] approximately 1970 to 1980. The building is utilized for both manufacturing and warehousing. Building 3 is a standard width, and thus narrowest in the complex, shallow-gable-roofed, steel- ) framed, 1.5-story enclosure approximately 31 feet in height, with a raised rooftop ridge ventilator. ] The building runs from west to east, and twin bay door entrances centered at its gabled ends. Common single-bay openings are located along its sides. Its most unique features are an open-air Alcoa/Arconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form(Part I Initial Study) July 27, 2017 Sapphos Environmental,Inc. Page 5 El—Pg 50 t t pavilion extension added to its "rear" east end, and two tall stainless steel smoke stacks at its south side. Building 3 is located along the south border of the site. This building dates from approximately 1970 to 1998. The building is Utilized for both manufacturing and warehousing. Building 4 is an extra-wide, shallow gable- roofed, steel-framed, 1.5-story enclosure approximately 52 feet in height with single, raised rooftop ridge ventilator, trio of single-bay door entrances j centered at its gabled ends, and single bay openings along its sides. It houses another forge, the largest presses, and features a slightly narrower and lower extension at its "rear," east end. Building 4 is used for grinding and cutting. This building dates from approximately 1970 to 1998. The building is utilized for both manufacturing and warehousing. Buildings 5, 6, and 7 are all simpler utilitarian, one-story, approximately 24 to 35 foot tall warehouse-style PEMDs, with shallow gable roofs, gabled-end single-bay entrances, and no raised ventilators. Buildings 5 and 6 run east-west along the perimeter of the Arrow Route, while Building 7 runs from north to south and is the final industrial enclosure along the east end of the site. This building dates from approximately 1970 to 1998. The building is utilized for both manufacturing and warehousing. , r Additional details on the buildings, including photographs, are provided in the Cultural Resources a Technical Report. ! Biotic Resources ' The project site contains 17 olive trees, all of which are concentrated between Building 6, Building 2, Building 1, and the northwestern corner of the project site. The two nearest olive trees to the proposed project footprint are located (1) approximately 80 feet north of Building 4 and (2) approximately 85 feet northwest of the northwestern corner of Building 4. Immediately adjacent to . the Administration Building, Building 2, and Building 6 are ornamental cypress or juniper shrubs. There are no trees or shrubs located within the southern or southeastern portion of the project site. �. During a site visit conducted on March 7, 2017, the only animals observed on the project site were , songbirds perched on Building 5. �- Zoning Setbacks The landscaped area on the northern and eastern portions of the project site serves to provide l visual shielding between the public right-of-way and the existing buildings on the project site, # consistent with the minimum development standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code for the MI/HI zone. ' 10 Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of b. information (books, published reports and oral history): No historical resources within the proposed project location were located in the Cultural Resources ; Technical investigation. This study found that the landscape, setting, buildings, and structures of the Arconic facility do not meet the criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRNP), California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR), or the Rancho Cucamonga City t ' Landmark criteria. Therefore, the Arconic facility does not meet the criteria to be treated as a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines. " f AlcoalArconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form(Part I Initial Study) l ul y 27,2077 Sapphos Environmental Inc. , Page 6 E1--Pg 51 --'1` �J -' There are no records of archaeological resources within the proposed project sites. There were no archaeological resources observed within the proposed project sites as a result of the field investigation. There is a low probability to encounter archaeological resources based on the ] inherent characteristics and location of the project sites. ] There were no cemeteries or burial sites observed as a result of the field investigation. There is a low probability to encounter human remains based on the inherent characteristics and location of ] the project sites. ] An Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) request for review of the Sacred Lands File ] (SLF) was submitted. A response was received from the NAHC on March 29, 2017, stating that a search of the SFL was completed for the project with negative results. There is a low probability to ] encounter tribal cultural resources based on the inherent characteristics and location of the project sites. -� 11 Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway ] noise, etc.)and how they would affect proposed uses: ] There are three public airports located within a 10-mile radius of the project site. These include LA/Ontario International Airport, which i� located approximately 3 miles southwest of the ] proposed project boundary at 2500 E. Airport Drive and 2900 E Airport Drive, Ontario, CA 91761; Cable Airport located approximately 8 miles east of the project site at 1749 W 13th St, Upland, CA 91786; and Chino Airport located approximately 9.5 miles southwest of the project site at-7-000 Merrill Ave Chino, CA 91710. There are no private airstrips located within a 10-mile radius of the proposed project site. The project site is not located within an airport land use area. -� Ambient noise levels were collected at six monitoring locations and summarized to include the 15- minute recording at five sites and one 24-hour recording. Based on these field observations, the ambient noise in the vicinity of the proposed project is dominated by local passenger vehicles and medium and heavy trucks. The maximum ambient noise levels recorded at the six monitoring locations (as high as 91.0 dBA) were due to intermittent heavy truck transportation in the vicinity of ] the proposed project. ] The above sources would not affect the proposed uses. ] Please the Noise Technical Report for further details. ] 12 Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that would result from the proposed project. Indicate if _i there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with ] each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. ] The Rings Division of Arconic Fastening Systems and Rings (AFSR) proposes to construct a new industrial building at the facility located at 11711 Arrow Route in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City), California 91730. When fully built out across two phases, the main building would be a metal framed building with exterior metal wall panels of approximately 360 feet (length) x 110 feet (width) x 65 feet (height). The proposed building would be immediately adjacent to and south of the existing forge Building 4, with vehicular and pedestrian access from the existing and new structures. As such, the new structure would be considered an expansion of Building 4 for City Planning and Building Department purposes. This new structure would come within approximately `] Alcoa/Arconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form (Part 1 initial Study) -� July 27, 2017 Sapplhos Environmental, Inc. _ Page 7 - E1--Pg 52 i 25 feet of an existing Building 3. A site plan showing the proposed phases and square footage is shown in Figure 4. l I2.1 Phase 1 Phase 1 would include the 22,550-square-foot building (205 feet long x 110 feet wide x 65 feet high). The proposed Building would enclose a 10,000-ton forging press and seven furnaces (6 million British Thermal Unit per hour [MMBtu/hr]) that would be fired by natural gas. Arconic , would complete the relocation of the Southern California Edison (SCE) substation and the rerouting of the underground utilities and cable, as part of ongoing operation and maintenance activities. The substation improvements and utility relocation and upgrades would have sufficient capacity to support the new building that would be constricted in Phases 1 and 2. In additionally, the new building would be connected to a new Hydraulic Pump Room and Electrical Building. The new Hydraulic Pump Room and Electrical Buildings comprise a total of approximately 9,575 square feet: (1) Hydraulic Pump Room Building (125 feet long x 45 feet wide x 30 feet high) and (2) Electrical Building (67 feet long x 59 feet wide x 30 feet high). There would be a common wall E. between the new building and Hydraulic Pump Room Building (east(west) and a common wall between the Hydraulic Pump Room and Electrical Buildings (north/south). A cooling tower pad would be located adjacent to the Hydraulic Pump Room Building and would be utilized to cool i the hydraulic oil that would drive the forging press. The new Building, Pump Room, and Electrical Buildings would be interconnected by a foundation pit and trench system. The trench system s would extend underground into the footprint of the existing Building 3, requiring structural improvementhelocation of an existing Building 3 column. In pre-project consultations with the City, the City has advised that the following work could be executed prior to project approval. That work would include the underground relocation of existing wet and dry utility equipment and lines generally located near or beneath the new Hydraulic Pump Room, Electrical Building and cooling tower; electrical transformers and switchgear; and [ow-voltage, medium-voltage, and high-voltage lines to ensure forging operations would continue for the existing facility and to facilitate new construction. [ . Upgrade of the natural gas service to the site would include underground distribution to new buildings and redistribution to various existing buildings. A storm drain crossing east/west beneath the approximate center of the proposed new main building would require relocation, in t conjunction with storm water management from the new construction to a new in ground management system. An SCE electrical substation is located in the southeast corner of the site; trenching and reinstatement of pavement would be required to bring electric service from the substation to the new development site. Repair/replacement of,the site storm water drainage trench would be considered. L i The new proposed building would house a 10,000-ton, four-column hydraulic forging press with a static weight of approximately 3,230 metric tons. The press would rise approximately 48 feet above finished floor level, and would require a foundation to a maximum depth of roughly 25 feet below finished floor level. An air-conditioned office would be required as a control room for the �- press and forging activity. The new main building would include a 20-ton overhead crane clear r . span for the length and width of the building. The new main building would require a gas, electric t (110V 1480V), compressed air and water utility loop for house lighting, ancillary equipment, hand tools, work stations, and so forth. The,new building would be naturally ventilated (fan assisted as required) to provide adequate cooling and air exchange for occupancy. r Alcoa/Arconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form(Part 1 Initial Study) 1 July 27, 2017 Sapphos Environmental, Inc. Page 8 E1—Pg 53 r -� Ancillary equipment in the Hydraulic Pump Room and Electrical Building would house services for the equipment within the new proposed building. They would be of concrete masonry structures —' construction. The Hydraulic Pump Room Building would be fan-ventilated, the Electrical Building air-conditioned. These buildings would not typically be occupied, except for preventativelreactive maintenance requirements. A 5-ton overhead crane clear span for length and width would service ] the hydraulic pump room. ] The cooling tower pad would integrate the cooling tower to the equipment within the Hydraulic Pump Room Building via a trench system, and may include small plinths (for switchgear/pump ] mounting). To increase the future capacity of the existing facility capabilities, a restroomlbreakroom currently located within existing Building 3 would be demolished and rebuilt ] in the new Building 4' as part of a future phase. ] Construction Schedule ] It is anticipated that Phase 1 would be constructed in 24 months starting in early 2018 and completed by mid-2019. ] Construction Scenario ] Site preparation and construction of the proposed project would be undertaken in accordance with all federal, state, and City building codes. Approximately 80 workers would be expected to be on- site during peak construction activity periods. Fewer than 10 workers would be expected to be on- site during non-peak construction activity periods. Construction equipment would be turned off ] when not in use. The construction contractor would be required to ensure that all construction, demolition, and grading equipment is properly maintained. All vehicles and compressors would --� utilize exhaust mufflers and engine enclosure covers (as designed by the manufacturer) at all times. ] All grading and earthwork would be verified by professional geotechnical engineering to ensure proper subgrade preparation, selection of satisfactory materials, and placement and compaction of structural fills. Any unanticipated adverse conditions encountered would be evaluated by ] professional geotechnical engineering, and the appropriate recommendation made and ] implemented. ] The plans and specifications for the proposed project would include a requirement for the construction contractor to comply with all provisions of the NPDES Program administered by the ] California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), as they relate to avoiding impacts from storm water runoff during construction. The construction contractor would be required to ] incorporate BMPs consistent with the guidelines provided in the Storm Water Quality Handbooks: Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual.' Should the construction period continue ] into the rainy season, supplemental erosion measures would be implemented, including, but not ] limited to, the use of: ] • Mulching • Geotextiles and mats ] • Earth dikes • Temporary drains and gullies ] • Silt fencing 'State of California Department of Transportation.March 2003.Storm Water Quality Handbooks:Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual. Sacramento,CA Alcoa/Arconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form (Part 1 Initial Study) July 27, 2017 Sapphos Environmental, Inc. Page 9 El--Pg 54 i i • Straw-bale barriers • Sand-bag barriers r Brush or rock filters • Sediment.traps • De-silting basins Prior to the beginning of construction, any vegetation designated for removal by the City approved plan would be removed from the proposed project site between October 15 and February 15 to . avoid the potential for nesting birds afforded protection pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act , to nest on the site. I _ The plans and specifications for the proposed project would include the requirement for construction equipment of the type and quantity specified in Table 1, Anticipated Equipment for Construction. Table 1 also lists the total number of days of operation, by equipment type. TABLE 1 ANTICIPATED EQUIPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION y ' " Type Quantity(A roximate} " Tota[.Numher of Da s is 0 -eration Dozer 1 40 Excavator 2 40 {_ Grader 1 40 Auger Drill Rig 2 70 Back Hoe 2 100 Roller 1 30 Crane 2 50 Aerial Lift 4 120 _, Water Truck 1 200 Skip Loader 2 150 _, Fork Lift 2 150 Cement Mixer 1 180 Concrete Saw 1 30 t.. L It is currently anticipated that between 5 and 80 construction workers would be on-site at any one time during the approximately 12-month construction period. There would be 3 discrete stages of construction during Phase 1 as follows: Stage 1. Southern California Edison Substation Renovation (prior to project approval) a. Ground Clearing b. Site Preparation C. Excavation, Grading _ d. Wall/Fence Construction e. Paving ( _ f. Landscaping t�s Stage 2. Existing Site Utility Relocation (prior to project approval) J g, Ground Clearing 11. Site Preparation Alcoa/Arconic Project Titan ,addendum to Environmental Information form(Part 1 initial Study) July 27, 2017 Sapphos,Environmental, Inc. t Page 10 f El--Pg 55 r _J -J i. Excavation, Grading ] j. Paving ] Stage 3. Building Construction k. Ground Clearing I. Site Preparation ] M. Excavation, Piling & Grading n. Construction ] o. Paving p. Architectural Coating q. Landscaping ] Site ingress and egress for construction, delivery vehicles, haul routes, and emergency response ] and evacuation would be from two locations: (1) northwestern corner gate on Arrow Route and (2) east gate from Rochester Avenue. One crane staging area would be located in the northwestern ] parking lot, and another near the PEMB Building 4. Construction traffic and concrete trucks would primarily use the gate on Rochester Avenue. ] In order to ensure compliance with the City's existing noise regulation, the applicant would use ] temporary noise barriers as required during outdoor construction activities. The temporary noise barriers would be installed at the boundary of the proposed project site. Use of temporary noise ] barriers during construction would ensure compliance with City Noise Ordinance. 12.2 Phase 2 ] In Phase 2, the proposed new Building would increase in size from 22,500 square feet, as ] constructed in Phase 1, to 39,600 square feet. The expansion of the building would be accomplished by extending the building to the west (to achieve an overall dimension of 360 feet ] long x 110 feet wide x 65 feet high). Construction Schedule ] It is anticipated that Phase 2 would be constructed 18 months later at the earliest beginning in 2020 and completed by mid-2021. The initiation of Phase 2 is dependent on availability of funding ] and market conditions and could be initiated anywhere between late 2019 and 2024. ] Construction Scenario J The construction scenario for Phase 2 would follow the Phase 1, Stage 3 description as above. 13 Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and ] any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height,frontage,setback, rear yard, etc.) _J South project site is located approximately 2.7 miles away and to the west of the location of the South Cucamonga town site which was the largest planned development near the project site in 1889, and is shown as remaining vacant in a 1903 map. The area is on the edge of the community of Guasti, named for the wine-making company that founded that area. A 1954 map shows two Alcoa/Arconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form(Part 1 initial Study) July 27, 2017 Sapphos Environmental,Inc. Page I 1 - E1--Pg 56 i ' 1 i buildings located on the larger block, but no buildings located at the corner containing the project site_ One of the two buildings is the pre-war phone company building located to the northeast of the Arconic project site. The larger surrounding area also is shown as remaining largely undeveloped except for four buildings on other blocks. The project site is immediately surrounded by ornamental trees (pine), shrubs, and turf grass to the i north and east, which partially shield the project site from view from the adjacent sidewalk. To the west and south, a row of ornamental trees (eucalyptus) adjacent to the project site provides visual separation between the project site and the adjacent industrial sites. Results from the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and Information, Planning and Consultation Database iPaC returned similar findings regarding any special status-species potential , for the project. These results included three mammals, two birds, and one insect. The three _ mammals, San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus), Stephens' kangaroo rat (Dipodomys stephensi), and the Pacific pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris pacificus) came back as having historical observations in the Guasti quadrant of the CNDDB. No observations came back either in, or immediately surrounding, the project site. Only Stephens' kangaroo rat holds a California State status of Threatened, while all three have a federal status of endangered. The Tri-Colored Blackbird (Agelaius tricolor) and the coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) were the resulting birds for the Guasti quadrant in the CNDDB. The Tri- Colored Blackbird is a State of California candidate species with no federal status. The coastal California gnatcatcher is federally threatened, with no State of California status. None of the bird species had observations near the project. The Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (Rhaphiomidas terminates abdominalis) was the resulting insect from the Guasti quadrant of the CNDDB. No observations were made near the project area, and the insect is considered extirpated from the !_ area. Where vegetation could support nesting birds in the immediate vicinity of the project, any activity during the nesting season (February 1—August 31) would be subject to review to ensure compliance with state and federal nesting bird protection regulations. A cultural resources technical report was prepared to characterize the Arconic Fastening System Manufacturing Facility Project site and vicinity with respect to cultural resources. There are no - records of Archaeological resources within the vicinity of the proposed project site. A field investigation was done and no archaeological resources were observed within the proposed project site. The field investigation also revealed that no cemeteries or burial sites were observed. As a result of the historical investigation, it was determined that the property is not eligible for inclusion in federal, state, or local registers due to loss of integrity.Therefore, the property does not appear to be a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, and the proposed project would not result in a substantial adverse change to a historical resource. The project site is located within an existing industrially zoned area that is surrounded by other L industrial (manufacturing and warehouse) land uses to the northeast, east, south, and northwest.' The industrial architecture surrounding the project site is generally characterized as tilt-up concrete _y warehouse construction with architectural features in contrasting colors and material (glass) to add ( „ a sense of scale to the structures. The proposed project area is zoned Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial. The current use of the project area is consistent with that zoning. f ; City of Rancho Cucamonga.City Council Adopted 18 July 2012. City of Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Map.Available at: _ https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/blobdioad.aspx?Blob]D=13208 AlcoalArconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form(Part l Initial Study) July 27, 2017 5apphos Environmental, Inc. r Page 12 i E1--Pg 57 -� 14 Would the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? While the pattern and character of the general area would most likely not change, the scale would increase, The proposed construction would include the two phases. The new structure would be a �] metal framed building with exterior metal wall panels of approximately 360 feet (length) x 110 feet (width) x 65 feet (height). The proposed project would be approximately 13 feet taller than the existing Building 4 and approximately 7 feet taller than the existing nearby Building 2. This new _ construction would be immediately adjacent to and south of the existing forge Building 4, with vehicular and pedestrian access from the existing and new structures. As such, the new structure would be considered an expansion of Building 4 for City Planning and Building Department purposes. This new structure would be located within approximately 25 feet of existing Building 3. As the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code establishes a maximum building height standard within the M1/H1 zone of 75 feet and the new buildings would not be located within the front -� setback area of the property, the proposed project would meet all setback and height requirements established in the Development Code.',' The proposed baghouse addition would be located near —� the southern edge of the project site, adjacent to other private industrial sites, and have a low level of public visibility as a result of being surrounded by existing buildings exclusively on private property. 15 Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How would these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? The distance at which short term noise impacts would be below the threshold of significance pursuant to Section 17.66.110 of the City's Municipal Code for the two phases of construction ranges from 22 to 140 feet without the use of noise attenuation devices. No sensitive receptors are located within a half mile of the project site. The loudest phases of construction (excavation/grading and finishing) would generate noise levels at a maximum of 93 dBA at -� approximately 30 feet from the construction staging area located at the southeast corner of the project site (Southern California Edison Substation) and nearest the property line. Generated noise levels would at a maximum of 83 dBA at the adjacent property line zoned G1 approximately 100 feet from the southeast corner construction staging area. By use of feasible noise control devices available for construction equipment, the noise level at the property line located at the southeast corner construction staging area (Southern California Edison Substation) would be reduced to approximately 78 dBA and below the 85 dBA threshold requirement for the M1/HI zone. The noise level projected at the nearest adjacent property line located approximately 100 feet from the southeast corner construction staging area, is approximately 68 dBA and below the 80 dBA threshold requirement for the GI zone. Therefore, with implementation of temporary noise mufflers, barriers and blankets, construction noise related j to the proposed project would not exceed the City's threshold of significance of 85 dBA at the project site property line and 80 dBA at the nearest adjacent property line zoned G1. City of Rancho Cucamonga. Effective 18 August 2014. Rancho Cucamonga Development Code:Article I— Administration.Article 1,Chapter 17.02.Available at: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BloblD=12919 e City of Rancho Cucamonga.City Council Adopted 18 July 2012. City of Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Map.Available at: httpsJ/wN%w.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BloblD=13208 AlcoalArconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form(Part 1 Initial Study) July 27, 2017 Sapphos Environmental,Inc. Page 13 E1--Pg 58 y The greatest long term noise level generated by the mechanical building equipment proposed on- site is comparable to the existing mechanical equipment used in the on-going day-to-day operations at the facility. The furnaces would generate the greatest noise level with a noise level (Leq) of 88.5 dBA 20 feet from the source, Pursuant to Section 17.60.110 of the Municipal Code; the noise source must be no louder than 85 dBA at the property line. Based on the calculation of noise impacts, the noise level at the property line (at the nearest distance of approximately 200 feet) would be 69 dBA without factoring in the use of sound attenuation features in the building design. The calculated noise level of 69 dBA is well below the significance threshold of 85 dBA. A The noise level at the adjacent property line would be 65 dBA and well below the 80 dBA threshold for a GI zone. Furthermore, noise generated from industrial equipment is generally absorbed and or sheltered by on-site structures and buildings and would include the use of Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) walls, further reducing noise levels. There are no sensitive receptors within a half-mile mile of the property site, no residential zones located within 200 feet of the project site, and the noise level at the property line and adjacent property line would be below the , City's threshold for G1 and Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) zones. 16 Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees There would be no removal and/or replacement of mature or scenic trees. All existing trees are located on the periphery of the property. The proposed development would occur inside the periphery so removal of trees is not required. 17 Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site ; drains t• , ._l The site surface drains to Day Creek and Cucamonga Creek Reach 1. The affected areas are split into three tributary areas: area "A" (7.55 acres), which surface drains and utilizes the existing storm I drain system, area "B" (3.07 acres), which utilizes an existing four-foot wide PCC v-gutter, and are "C" (0.23 acres), which utilizes an existing two-foot wide PCC v-gutter. All three areas are tributary - to an existing PCC lined channel running along the southerly property line in an easterly direction. 18 Indicate expected amount of water usage. Commercial water usage is projected to be 210,203 gal/day/ac and peak use is projected to be 146 gal/min/ac. ' r • • t . AlcoalArconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form(Part l initial Study) July 27, 2017 Sapphos Environmental, Inc. Page 14 ` El—Pg 59 J 19 Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ] The proposed method of sewage disposal is by existing Sewer. The additional Commercial/Industrial rate of disposal is projected to be ] Current cooling tower) discharge = 13 ccf/day current + (cooling tower) 18 ccf/day expanded New cooling tower discharge = 18 ccf/day ] Total discharge = 31 ccf/day = 23,187 gals/day ] Total site acreage = 7,67 acres ] Projected sewer flow = 23,187/7.67 = 3,011 gal/day/acre 1.3 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS ] Items 20 to 24 are not applicable to the Arconic Project Titan since it is an industrial facility. ] 1.4 COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS ] 25 Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: ] Arconic manufactures forged rings from an extensive array of alloys. Forged rings are used extensively in turbine engines for aircraft. ] 26 Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type ] Please see Figure 4 for the total floor area for the proposed project. 27 Indicate hours of operation The hours of operation are continuous, 24 hours per day. ] 28 Number of employees (totals and shifts). ] Please see Table 2, Employees, on the next page. i ] j Alcoa/Arconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form(Part I Initial Study) —+ July 27, 2017 Sapphos Environmental, Inc. J Page 15 El--Pg 60 1 1E�0 r r co r r N N N r r V t`[ -'dstm jai tea r add.SH3 N CS[ oda M rn C h 1 -= C [ - 3vd NH N # 3vd "P is s ulpgp ON r- � [ 1 V7 b ` sir `a JOS N O N r. •it .r� :�:.,, M N r 1\ �.-- r ice{LU N LLI �a ; w yAsu��a Qd Odltis tin "'{'j �Ulad11� N '�r u.f r"SrL •,Ey.:..R r. r FIy > E rs LllOOJ�00 .- r r f� N N C-4 }-1.14ii e3 z3 C `,=B�[1lUaaulE v M u•k I� N F- .�--. ? �fi1'Il N `- - L r! F� t� dogsauly�e o, uk N us . N co 14 -Or �•��k�3� r H i t r 1 + ; sA �f Its [ytkjS '.¢ At, t i 4{ tS. jtitr t f9 r� 1tib�I .^4n t3'1'�h z� c�.� Q < Q }z �� fnS,7i+t�s a !Frin ey. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9'�a E{«� by n Irl �Y P i g m M M r'1 m M m m O O O 00 O O O x r'• k c ` it�T x'Lk N .. .. nI M 4 lD CO G1 a; e— � L'j L7 � Ysf s(i" F Y"ih cYr`s 1 '- O O O O p O O 0 0 0 r O O O U r r r �_ G ¢ QQQQQa. o., Cl- 1LfL CL. CL 000000 000000000 f E� Ooa0000O000Ern CnOa CO O N r r NCO G1 61 p ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E1—Pg 61 r 29 Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary) The following is the anticipated breakdown and salary range: 2017 MF(-'t 34 - MinireUm $28,000, Average $37,000 2018 MFG _ x30 - MiniruLffn $28,000, Average $42,000 2019 - ENG - 24 - Minimum $46,000, Average $48,000 30 Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City It is anticipated that 100 percent of the workers to be hired Would reside in the City. 31 For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions ConstrLICtiOn emissions frorn the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts to air quality related to violating any air quality standard or contributing substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation with regard to COnStrLICtion. Construction emissions are shown in -tion Emissions. Table 3, Construc TABLE 3 CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Cohstruction Emissions(Pound L" Construction' Phase': 2018 maximum daily emissions 433 34W 31.81 O�08 2.93 8J3 --------------- ...... ......... .... .......... 2019 maximum daily emissions 194 28.61 29.60 0.08 2.78 7.97 2020 maximum daily emissions 2.89 24.50 21.12 0.06 1.37 2,80 ............ ............ ......... 2021 maximum daily emissions 15�29 21.48 20.20 O.06 1�25 2.66 .......... ....... ...... Maximum 15,29 34W 31.81 0�08 2.93 813 ................... .......... 75 100 5,50 150 55 150 Jh rc� I-Significant? NoNo KEY: VOC - V01afile organic compound; NO. - oxides of nitrogen, CO - carbon monoxide, SO, - oxides of sulfur; PM2,, - fine particulale matter, Mio coarse particulate matter. SOURCE:Sapphos Environmental,Inc. 12 April 2017.CaIEEMod 20163.1 SUrnmer OWPLA(Appendix A)- Operational emissions were estimated for the seven new furnaces that would be installed, A summary of the emissions are shown in Table 4, Operational Ernissions froin the Furnaces. The emissions (or all Pollutants are below the levels of significance. The facility would accept as facility- wide cap on natural gas consumption that Would allow the NOx levels to reach below the significance levels. This natural gas limit has beer) proposed to the SCAQMD through the air permit application for the pernrit to construct and would be enforced by the SCAQMD. Compliance with this limit would ensure that the NOx operational emissions would stay below the significance levels. .............. Ah':oalArconic Prca)ject 7itao Addeodum to Environmental Inforrvation r-orm Wart I Initial Study) luly 27, 20 17 sapphos EnvitDomental, 1r)( Page 17 El-Pg 62 i i TABLE 4 OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS FROM THE FURNACES Emission . ' Max,Hourly Daily F significance Factor* Emissions Emissions Threshold A' ibllvtlVlscf ,Ifa7Fiour [bYday I 'fd Si�nifica at? t Reactive organic gases 7 0.28 6.7 55 No NOx 63.8 1.64 39.5 55 No sox 0.6 0.024 0.6 150 No CO 35 1.4 33.6 550 No r Pm1lpm-'.3 7.5 0.3 7.2 1501.55 No 1 KEY:]b= pounds;MMscf= million standard cubic feet. NOTE:*SCAQMD,Annual Emissions Reporting(AER)Tool defaults for externa[combustion,other equipment C 10 million British thermal units(MMBtu)/hour. NOx is based on the SCAQMD Best Available Control Technology(BACT) standard of 50 parts per million (PPM). The SCAQMD permit limit would include a turndown based on how the furnaces cycle. Total daily . NOx emission rate of 39.45 Ib/day, which is based on a 50 ppm BACT (63.8 Ib/MMsco and an average annual turndown rate of 64.5 percent. Hourly and annual emissions are as follows: Hourly MHU = E.F. x heat rate x utilization factor f Hourly = 63.80 lbs/MMscf x 0.00571 MMscf/hr * 0.645 2.35E-01 lbs/hr Daily MHU x daily hours of operation I . Dail 2.35E-01 lbs/hr x 24 hrs/da Daily = y = 5.64 lbs/day r > I 5.64 lb NOx/furnace * 7 furnaces = 39.45 Ib NOx/day c 55 Ib NOx/day This.would ensure that the CEQA daily threshold would not be exceeded. , I � Based on emissions modeling, unmitigated construction activities would result in the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of approximately 225.1 MT COze/year. This is well below the CARB recommended threshold of 25,000 metric tons of°COze per year. As shown in Table 5, operational r emissions of CO2 from the seven furnaces:are 9,209 MT COze/year, well below the 10,000 MT CO:ze/year for industrial facilities. TABLE 5 ; GHG OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS FROM THE FURNACES I - Y rrHH GGA�GG AA i f �J SlSk�+ � S "r t�{; _ lwJ •RJgJ�Vn , �'.. ,FF M4xkr7 060 y »t y ,. 1'f[IMA.l�e A, � ° t IJt15510n S� i �r� mISSIOnSY"� �11•hrE5IlOItI �� '` ''��'�n % 'F r -,�'K,.t ��i t X�4 .�� E sxa.:''{.£ z x"si�.�� '"' I Y -.� x.#--..,��:�i . »v. �.�'s "�' ;$'�rn+•w �+rw7 T'� �� rYry1 4,�� i.__a` + �r �` R 3} 1 4- t ( }22F� Kx � : '�,� A kyy R ✓�.. " .L �K 1 1.�.'`Y. °��` - � r��,,�zk - Y... �.}w.��Y,,� � .• -�. ....�: gn coni :,s..co;! 53.1 3,162.28 9,209 10,000 No IL KEY.kg = kilograms,MmBtu — million British thermal units; Ib= pounds;MMscf million standard cubic feet,MT = metric tons. NOTE:* Emission factors for GHG inventories,https://www.epa.gov/siteslproduction/files!.2015-07/documentslemission- factors_2014.pdf. Lb/day emissions were calculated'with 7 furnaces each with 6 MMBtu/hour rating and an average annual tumdown rate of 64.5 percent with natural gas 1,050 Btu/scf heating value. AlcoalArconk.Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form(Part 7 initial Study) July 27,2077 Sapphos Environmental, Inc. i Page 16 E1—Pg 63 I J Just as for NOx, an annual average turndown rate of 64.5 percent was used. CO2 emissions from the furnaces depend on the amount of natural gas that is combusted. Annual CO2 emission were calculated as follows: Hourly MHU E.F. x heat rate x utilization factor (°/o) Hourly = 53.1 kg/MMbtu x 2.2 Ib/kg x 1,050 Btu/scf x 0.00571 MMscf/hr/furnace x 7 furnaces x 0.645 = 3162.28 Ib/hr Annual = MHU x annual hours of operation Annual = 3162.28 lbs/hr x 16 hours/day x 7 days/week x 52 weeks/year x 1/2000 MT/Ib = 9,209 MT/year c 10,000 MT/year Additional details with regard to air emissions are available in the Air Quality/GHG Technical Report and the Health Risk Assessment Technical Report. 32 Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. The proposed project would continue to be served by the existing water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies and would not affect their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project. 32.1 Water The project site is currently served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District.' Cucamonga Valley Water District serves a 47 square mile area which includes the City of Rancho Cucamonga, portions of the cities of Upland, Ontario and Fontana, and some unincorporated areas of San Bernardino County. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is 83.84% of CVWD Service Area.' Population is expected to grow from 200,466 is 2015 to 228,300 by 2035. Projected demands would grow from 58,900 in 2020 to 63,700 by 2035.9 Cucamonga Valley Water District supplies for 2015 from all sources, including groundwater, purchased or imported water, recycled water, surface water and transfers totaled 42,678 AF (acre- feet).. Projected water supply is anticipated to grow from 60;500 to 65,700 between 2020 through 2035. The facility water usage is anticipated at 210,203 gal/per day. Based on the projected growth in water supply, existing service to the project site, and the anticipated demand for the project, the ❑ 'Cucamonga Valley Water District:Accessed 23 March 2017. Water Supply_Available at http:l/www.cvwdwater.comll 33/Water-Supply © s Cucamonga Valley Water District.June 2016. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan.Available at: ❑ http:/Iwww.cvwdwater.com Cucamonga Valley Water District.June 2016..2015 Urban Water Management Plan.Available at: httpJlww%v.cvwdwater.com AlcoalArconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information form(Part I Initial Study) July 27,2017 Sapphos Environmental,Inc. Page 19 �� E1—Pg 64 S P i Cucamonga Valley Water District has capacity and supply for the proposed development and continued service of the project site. t 32.2 Sewage The Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) currently operates and maintains approximately i 421 miles of wastewater collection system ranging from 8 to 36 inches in diameter. Wastewater that is generated by CVWD's' customers is transported through this collection system and sent to Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA) Wastewater Treatment facilities where it is processed into .recycled water. The Regional Sewerage System includes 90 miles of regional sewage interceptors. , The sewage lateral pipelines are owned and maintained by the individual contracting agencies. All of the wastewater is treated at the Agency's Recycled Water Regional Plants, which provide advanced tertiary treatment that meets or exceeds all California Department of Public Health Services (Title 22 regulations) and Resources Water Quality Control Board's waste discharge permit requirements. i . 32.3 Fire r _ The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) provides fire response and emergency services for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District is authorized by LAFCO to provide the following function: fire protection and emergency medical services.°°The project site is located outside of the Fire Hazard Severity Zones." The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's Strategic Plan 2005, FY 2005/2006 provides a list of personnel staff and equipment for all Fire Stations within the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection j. District. The project site fire response services are primarily provided by Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Fire Station #174 (Jersey Fire Station) located at 11297 Jersey Blvd. One (1) truck and one (1) engine its located at the station for response services and includes three (3) personnel per truck/engine with a total of six (6) fire personnel (including one (1) Paramedic).' - Secondary services are provided by Fire Station #173 Day Creek Fire Station located at 12270 Fire House Ct. One Engine and three (3) personnel (at least one (1) is Paramedic) for this location. RCFPD is the first responder for any hazardous material emergencies. The Hazardous Materials Team at Day Creek Station #173 is trained in both biological and chemical hazardous materials emergency response. 32:4-i—Flood Control Debris flows and flooding hazards associated with the San Gabriel Mountains are controlled by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and include debris basins and flood control facilities _,. in the City and Sphere area to properly protect form debris flows and flooding. The project site is located in proximity to the Day Creek Channel and lies in Flood Control Zone 1 under the San ..a L�. 10 See hap://sbclafco-org/FiscalInd icatorslSubsidiaryDistricts/RanchoCucamongaFPD-aspx " City of Rancho Cucamonga.Adopted 19 May 2010. 2010 General Plan. Chapter S:Public Health and Safety. Available at:https-./Avww.cityofrc.us/cityha[]/planning/genplan.asp "Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.2005. Strategic Plan 2005.Available at: https:/fwww.cityofrc.uslcivicax/filebanWblobdload.aspx?b[obid=2795. ! AlcoalArconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form(Part 1 Initial Study) July 27,2017 Sapphos Environmental, Inc- Page 20 E1–Pg 65 r _J i Bernardino County Department of Public Works." Development of the proposed project would be in compliance with all county and city requirements regarding flood control." 71 33 In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, '] but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials.and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. The project site is listed as an RCRA Large Quantity Generator of hazardous waste (EPA ID CAD053848610), generating 1,000 kilograms (kg) or more of hazardous waste during any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month, �] and accumulates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg of less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spoil, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 100 kg of that material at any time. The project site had a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) waste discharge permit CAS000001, and is listed as having a minor indirect threat to water quality, namely the Santa Ana River, from the treatment or disposal of liquid or semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing, or processing operation. The project site is listed as having four 7,500-gallon historical USTs for diesel storage. These USTs have been documented as being removed in 1996. As reported in the certified record search finding for 11711 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, California by the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District, the four historical USTs were closed on October 3, 1986, and removed on May 20, 1996. The log numbers for the closure and removal are 100386-01 and 052096-01, respectively, and are provided in the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Technical Report. 34 Would the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. Aboveground storage.tanks (ASTs) for diesel, hydraulic oil, and wastewater are present on the site. Antifreeze, graphite, chemarrow flake, soap, coolant, gear oil and metal waste shavings are also stored on site. Pictures of storage of this material have been provided in Appendix A of the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Technical Report. The facility maintains a Hazardous Materials Business Plan that includes inventory, method of disposal and locations for the existing operation. 71 This plan would be updated to reflect the inventory, method of disposal and locations after the proposed project. "See http://cros.sbcounty.gov/dpw/FloodControl/DistrictZones.aspx '4 City of Rancho Cucamonga.Adopted 19 May 2010.2010 Genera!Plan. Chapter 8:Public Health and Safety. Available at: https://w%vw.cityofrc.us/cityhalllplanning/genplan.asp Alcoa/Arconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental information Form(Part 1 Initial Study) Yl July 27, 2017 Sapphos Environmental, Inc. —' Page 21 E1—Pg 66 35 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project, planner would confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning_ Commission/Planning Director hearing. Arconic would pay all the appropriate fees that would be identified by the City. Li F.l l.._s �i e -_t AlcoalArconic Project Titan Addendum to Environmental Information Form(Part I Initial Study) L July 27, 2017 Sapphos Environmental, Inc. Page 22 El--Pg 67 i City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART 11 BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Design Review DRC2017-00141 2. Related Files: NIA 3. Description of Project: The project scope includes a new 39,600 square foot industrial building, and two new ancillary equipment buildings totaling 9,166 square feet on an existing industrial site totaling 17.5 acres of land. The site currently has a total of seven industrial buildings onsite, totaling 53,007 square feet of manufacturing and 264,355 square feet of warehouse space. The site also has an office and administration building consisting of 16,500 square feet of office space. The proposed 39,600 square foot industrial building will consist of 14,276 square feet of manufacturing space and 25,324 square feet of warehousing space. The building will house up to 14 industrial furnaces and a new forging press to complement existing production onsite. APNs: 0229-111-74 & 75. 4. Project Sponsor Name and Address: James Yost J.R. Miller&Associates 2700 Saturn Street Brea, CA 92821 5. General Plan Designation: Heavy Industrial (HI) District 6. Zoning: Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/Hl) District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The proposed buildings are in the middle of the project site, surrounded by existing manufacturing and warehouse buildings. The project site is located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue. The site on the opposite side of Arrow Route is zoned General Industrial (GI) and currently consists of the Rancho Cucamonga Adults Sports Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care & Adoption Center. The site on the opposite side of Rochester Avenue is zoned General Industrial (GI) and consists of large industrial and warehousing facilities similar in scale to the project site. The sites to the south and west of the project site are located in the Minimum ImpactfHeavy Industrial (MI/HI) District and also consist of large industrial and warehousing facilities similar in scale to the project site. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Dat Tran, Assistant Planner (909) 774-4326 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) El—Pg 68 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Design Review DRC2017-00141 Page 2 GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD—California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD--Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR—Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report FPE1R-Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES--National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx--Nitrogen Oxides ROG--Reactive Organic Gases PM10—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (_}Aesthetics (_)Agricultural Resources (X)Air Quality (_) Biological Resources (X) Cultural Resources (X) Geology&Soils (X) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (X) Hazards &Waste Materials (X) Hydrology &Water Quality (_) Land Use& Planning (_) Mineral Resources (X) Noise L) Population & Housing U Public Services (_) Recreation U Transportation/Traffic (X) Utilities &Service Systems (X) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( } I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (X) I find that although the proposed project_could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( } I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant lmpact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ( } I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 69 ---- ---------------------------------- Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Design Review DRC 017-00141 Page 3 mitigated pursuant to that earlier FIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required, -7, Prepared By. Date: Reviewed B y Date: Rev 3-1-16 1--Pg 70 Initial Study for DRC201.7-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Than Significant Less potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigstian Significant No Impact Inca orated Impact Im act EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACTS' 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a,substantial adverse effect on.a scenic vista? O ( } ( } (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources,'including, but O ( } ( } (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or O O O (✓} quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create. a new source of substantial light or glare, O O ( j (✓} which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according,to General Plan Figure LU-6. The site is located along Arrow Route, which is considered as a Special Boulevard per General Plan Figure LU-6. However, the eastern side of Arrow Route where the site is located is largely developed with industrial and warehousing facilities of comparable size and scale. The proposed project will not have a substantial'adverse impact on the aesthetic quality of Arrow Route. There are no scenic vistas along Arrow Route close to the location of the project site. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C) The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project because there are no scenic resources or view,corridors within the general vicinity. The site is located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, and 'is characterized by industrial/warehouse developments to the south, east and west. The site to the north consists of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care & Adoption Center and the Rancho Cucamonga Adults Sports Park. The Adoption Center and Sports Park are both surrounded by existing industriallwarehouse developments. Overall, the project site is located within an in-fill industrial area and staff has determined the proposed site improvements will be compatible with surrounding environment. A Design Review committee has reviewed the project and agrees with staff that the proposed buildings.will not degrade the visual character of the surrounding environment. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities where proposed to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility fines and utility 'enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would not increase the number of streetlights used in .the immediate vicinity. The proposed buildings will be located at the center of a developed 17.5 acre site. The site requires no additional streetlights. Modifications are made to onsite parking, circulation and pedestrian areas and will alter existing on-site lighting. All on-site illumination levels. provided for parking, circulation, and pedestrian areas will continue to comply with Development Code standards. Lighting is shielded, diffused or otherwise Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 71 1 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigaticn Significant No IMpact Incorporated Im act .Im act directed away from adjacent properties to prevent glare. Lighting. is also confined to the area•of illumination within the project site. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Convert. Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or O O O {✓) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared ,pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (✓) Williamson Act contract? C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, O O O (✓) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government. Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest O O { ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing -environment, O ( } { ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of 'Statewide Importance. The site is located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue and currently consist of existing industriallwarehousing facilities. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation .Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in.the southern and eastern ,parts of the City that'is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for :development. Furthermore, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan°FPEIR identified the conversion of .,j4ftblands to urban uses as. a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a �� Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is.no agriculturally zoned land'within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. C) There are no lands within the City. of Rancho Cucamonga that Js zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore, no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 72 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore, no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue and is characterized by industrial/warehouse developments to the south, east and west. The properties to the north of the site consist of the Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care & Adoption Center. The site is an existing industrial/warehousing facility and is not being utilized as Farmland or zoned for agricultural use. The proposed buildings would therefore not result in conversion of the land from Farmland to non-agricultural use. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( } (✓) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of { ) (✓ } O { ) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant { ) (✓) O ( ) concentrations?` e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial O O O (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As discussed in subsection b, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP .(consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore, the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (Os), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 73 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Than Significant Less PotentiaEly With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Sign;ticant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact particulate matter (PMio and PM2.e) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (HiS), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of-safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management, District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the.Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States. gives the Basin the worst.air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude);. this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)-for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (Os), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM1o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns' in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide(NO2), sulfur dioxide (S02), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which 'the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria,, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have. additional restrictions as required by .the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non Attainment Status for Ozone, PM10 and PM2.5. Specific'criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a:project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissionsthresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, January 2018) was prepared that utilizes CaIEEMod (Version 2016.3.1) to evaluate-short- term construction.emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation.emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas,Emissions. Short_Term.(Construction): Protect Emissions and Impacts The project involves the construction of a new 39,600 square foot industrial manufacturing/warehouse facility and two ancillary equipment buildings totaling 9,166 Rev 3-1-16 El—Pg 74 Initial Study for 7RC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 .................. Less Than S J" �gnjficant Less patentfalCy W Rum Issues and Supporting Information Sources: &gmficant M" Stgn[kanl] No -F --IL --Ln _ _ao LLd.- —JE61.22L.... square feet on an existing industrial site located within the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/1-11) District, The project site is Currently developed with a total of seven industrial buildings onsite, totaling 53,007 square feet of manufacturing and 264,355 square feet of warehouse space. The site also has an office and administration building consisting of 16,500 square feet of office space, The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections: Construction Ft�no s Construction....... 0�V 2018 r1laxinlum daily erniSsions 433 34,07 31.81 0.08 2.93 8.13 2019 rW1Xi1TWM(Jai ly PMkSiCMS R14 28.61 29M 0,08 2,78 7.97 2020 maxitnum dady emissions 2.89 24.50 21,12 0.t6. . 1J7 2,80 2021 inaximum daHy emission15,29 21,48 2U0 OX16 1,21, 2,66 ............. 15 2,1:") 34X 31,81 0,08 193 8,13 qignificipi(,e construclion 75 100 5,50 150 55 150 ly) Significant? No NoNo No No No --— .1 - ]_ _ ---J KEY:VOC -, voLvile<)rgark,rolnpound; NC), - oxkfes c')f 11itlogen,CO - (',ubon Mkk`s Of sulfur, PM — fim,>partictihie nwner� 1M warejmnwidate mawr. Construction activities associated with the project will result in emissions of VOCs, NO,, CO, SOx, PlMit) and PM2F,, and are expected from the following construction activities: demolition, grading (including soil import), building construction, painting (architectural coatings) paving (curb, gutter, flatwork, and parking lot), and construction worker commuting. Per the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, January 2018), construction activities associated with the project will not exceed SCAQMD overall significance thresholds for all the emissions types Loc.afized_.Sig_nificance Threshofor Construction J:. wgz'�7 1H, M,MiD1L1M Day Emissions fn)rn projpct 15,29 34.07 3 1 81 0.08 2.93 8.13 ............... A owable emissiilons for I a(i,e fora sonsifive recel�)tor lova red 500 meters N/A 65)2 2+,065, 141 280 Bp ot I: ,/dy) Significant? No N o N o N`"o L ........ ........... lartC E: ,acrlatl7 (_east lir y Manaprvient Districl 'Appendix(", BT Mass Rate 1ook-1.rp Tables, Final Lmalimd Significance I hreshold Meilvxblogy' Jum- 2008, Avail stole' A: S(Mro?h� i(, in teuit p(J(?SfVr5n—2 Per the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, January 2018), construction activities associated with the project will not exceed SCAOMD significance thresholds for all the emissions types for which SCAQMD has a local threshold level for significance. Rev 3-1-16 El–Pg 75 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigaticn Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions; however, as shown in the tables above, the amount will not exceed any threshold of significance. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), a list of carbon compounds monitored by the California Air Resources Board. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 15.29lbs of VOCs per day (combined for all construction sources) during all phases of construction. Therefore, this VOCs emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75lbslday. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. The future operations of the project would include the firing of natural gas and the use of hydraulic oils, neither of which would generate odors that would affect a substantial number of people. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally_Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 76 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following Best Available Control Measures (BACM) as mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less-than-significant: 1) All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQIViD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts: Short-Term Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Pian (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (Os), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM1o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. Based on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, January 2018), no short-term, operational impacts would•occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short- term air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less-than- significant: 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment its being properly serviced and maintained as per Rev 3-1-16 E1--Pg 77 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Loss Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impart manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 10) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. Rev 3-1-16 E 1—Pg 78 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of rancho Cucamonga Page 12. grripcant Less a�oWnbaa[ft Viar reran Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s�tar,ea�rw�aar,r� M�t�tr aaaar, ISlqmficaM No Irri mark McaR rocrr�r&nY Iwar r�tiP tlrrr:vsaa 11) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and regional Water Quality Control Board (rWQCl3)) daily to reduce PM1ra emissions, in accordance with SCAQMImD rule 403, 12) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMCD and rWQC ) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions, Proiect Long Term (Operational) Emissions and Im acts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area;. therefore„ the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project, dun°7r31a „of P &kmm.C .laticg Lt:,missions _.. ,..e__. .._. ., .._..� _ . _.._... _. t f:rn ksuarel ✓" 35 OY 6 T5 T.�Ti Mia0ansaatn L-dratlAl .,�. ks _ ...._._. __....__.... ....._ ...._.. �.� ....___ ._.mm__._ . ....w ...,.. ,,,_. ... ....._. ...�_......_, v rna ansa dk)40 0,28 T,61 f t (:,02 I 0 � .3 .~d':'lauud &akRi,xSCcaelallk»��. �....,...._. ..........._. ._...__ _ ._._._ .... _ _... ... ....___...... ...... .._._.._ c plant 6 I93 1 6 06 72 S gnsf Cance Tieapsl,wdol Ott lda,rlF Tr elf I:ofk I udP °wu ctrfic,nr No to No No �t> No f:T;Ita a °sar«ads„MM _,. � �.� rruuillraprr saarata4�d r�tal.uia fc"awt.. NO " Sit:,AQW),Annu,0 f issims,Reporting(AER)Tar(�ai di4aarjhs frroa estemal r t.rpribusotion,r;:ottt„n r^rlar'upnlent < '10 rodhora[Ifitish therrraaal auantsr,(MMBtu /hour, NOx i�bawd on the";C:�AC,yMD Best Av abbte r,:ontud Technology(RAC I d staauvd.ttd'Df,50 p alEs raer wi linar(I"I"iMs I.Fraaa tuon of coeaabraratima PM10 1hawt consists ass l�'° 2 s is 95)%,so afll RMI 0 t»u as,rw ned to r rumen isn at I"Co2.la 4see rsafAe 3,Ir(AQMD Finial Methodnia:ar„"w to Caals rslarte VN4:?.5'igmi'Iraasnce fruresNaoWs,0 ea bt'l 2t 06) Localized SigrDificance Thresholds to C7p ra(oras: r �'l 1 r r r m / i r�/ rr%/ irr / / 1 ru�L✓fii�i% 7 a""7 6 r.rri//J^!/ +�.i/ �,li '."Jf"T71 ii , /r r/ fir . //y/� 1 fi/a lrr iri ,p' J r / „ a� / Ni,c0norn Daily ln)issions from prQject ...w 6./ 39.3 3'3.6 O.6 1,/ /',./ Adle.san 1l;ale naassia tt. rte w, sensitive ior1_a.._...... _ _ _ ..._._._.._..... a sensitive receptor Irsa.ate d `00 rnetersa N/A 6:52 »3,0611 N/A "14 68 trout sk 1paltratalarr� 4� Irydt Cls��c3�R t;rrtlfirwrntf ..._ .—_. _ .... .. ..._... ....._.... .._. .... �_. f" Jo o No No. leo .. �f)atlCt'i�fw. South (`creat Air Qtr,r"rdrlfr Mari agerrl€nt C3istaecl....�Aiaraenalix C d�LSI....M ess a7ie Lta�f•I,.IIa l�ttalt+w. F¢er�I Ltac alex�t�l Significance Tkwter;Iaoitl Metfirutdralogy," Ietrre 2008 Available at� k1tif/mvww a(Irnai, ovftla)c%/defata9t�- sraaaa t a,t°c t�tra�h�laaclLataaat�ieaar�diea; -r»uaaulicaear as aWtaesdaardtdr�'1�itaaai Vat-amaetcrrl;sleuyr dc�;tevrrt:nt.LrrlffsEur.ra "�' Cumulative Impacts (Long Term/Operational Emissions Rev 1.1-.16 E1—Pg 79 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant MiVgafion SigNfmant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the potential impacts to air quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, continued development would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, all developments would be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a less-than-significant level. This City-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less-than-significant: 13) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 15) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 16) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 19) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 20) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 21) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 22) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 23) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. _ C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Pian FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as Rev 3-1-16 ET—Pg 80 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im acl a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was j ultimately adopted by the City Council. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2090 General Plan FPEIR, which are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less-than-significant. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 114 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within % mile of the following potentially sensitive receptors: Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care &Adoption Center(11780 Arrow Route) Rancho Cucamonga Adults Sports Park(6408 Rochester Avenue) During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less-than-significant levels. 24) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.6 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplacesihearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. I Rev 3-1-16 E1--Pg 81 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Im ac! Im ael 4. BIOLOGICAL. RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or O ( } { ) (✓) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( } ( ) (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally O O ( } (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) { ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) ( } (✓) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat { ) ( } O (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area generally developed with industriallwarehouse uses. The site has been previously developed into an industrial facility with 333,862 square feet of manufacturing, warehouse and office space. The site has been largely graded over and consists primarily of asphalt and concrete surfaces, with a limited number of decorative planter areas surrounding the site for screening purposes. A Biological Resources Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, July 2017) identified 103 special status species considered to be endangered, threatened or deemed of special concern at the Federal level and by the State of California. None of the special status species was identified at the project site. Several common avian species were detected but were judged to be common wildlife and of low biological value. No sensitive plant communities or habitats were found within the project site. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources. Therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan land Use Plan. b) The project site is located in an industrial area with no natural communities. The area onsite where the proposed buildings will be located consists of asphalt and concrete Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 82 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act trncor orated Impart Impact surfaces currently used for equipment storage. A biological report prepared by Sapphos Environmental (dated July 2017) found no natural riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. Additionally, planning staff conducted a walkthrough of the site in August 2097. Staff visually inspected the property and did not identify any body of water, which is consistent with the biological report prepared by Sapphos Environmental. The project will not have any adverse impacts on riparian or natural plant communities. C) Theroject site is an existing p � g industrial facility. A biological report prepared by Sapphos Environmental, dated July 2017, found no natural wetland or riparian habitat existing on- site, meaning project implementation would have no impact on these resources. No adverse impacts are expected. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. The project site is not located near the tributaries in the City. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) No trees are being proposed for removal from the site and all landscaping will remain as existing. Therefore, the proposed project does not conflict with the City's Tree Preservation ordinance or any other ordinances protecting biological resources. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL. RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( } ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( } resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred O ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). The project site is not listed in the California Office of Historic Preservation's Register of Historic Resources. Furthermore, a Cultural Resources Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, July 2017) was prepared for the project site. The report included a site visit and a review of existing archaeological and historical records on file at the South Central Coastal Information Center. The record search included all sites within a 0.25 mile radius. No historical resources were located within the proposed project location. The Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 83 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact report concluded that the proposed project would not result in a substantial adverse change to a historical resource. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) and the Cultural Resources Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, July 2017) prepared for the project site. Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the General Plan FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Pian. The Cultural Resources Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, July 2017) prepared for the project site similarly concluded that the project site is located above Quaternary deposits and has Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 84 Initiai Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact the potential to contain paleontological resources. Therefore, the following mitigation measures per the General Plan FPEIR shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontologicaI monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to,the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by previous development. The site has been largely graded over and consists primarily of asphalt and concrete surfaces, and 333,862 square feet of existing building space. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) { ) ( } V) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 85 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Impact Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( } ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) { } ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) {✓) ( ) ( ) C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( } ( } (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPE1R, The Red Hill Fault, passes within 2.2 miles (northwest) of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4.6 miles (north) of the site. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. The San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is approximately 5 miles from the northeast corner of the city and approximately 10.2 miles away from the site itself. The San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is approximately 8 miles from the northeast corner of the city and approximately 12.8 miles away from the site itself. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are mitigated and reduce risk of loss, injury, or death to people and damage to structures. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: Z) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 86 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Than Signifcant Less Potentially with Tha Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Significn ant No Impact Irncor orated Impact Impact 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically stable. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No impacts are anticipated. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project. a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) V) () ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Comments: a) Re-gulations and Significance—The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 9979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas (GHG) emissions reduction target in Executive Order(EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines 6 key Rev 3-1-16 El—Pg 87 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Potentraely With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation SIgniflcant Ido Impact Incar orated Impact Im ac1 GHGs (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), hydrofiuorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)). The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PMID, PM2.e, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PMto, and PM2.s Levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Proiect Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Rev 3-1-16 El--Pg 88 Initial Study for DRC 017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less rhar� significaM Les dWsmraft l4 Wio 1'flavl lSSUes and Supporting Information Sources,�� slqmfiamWifpafion SigmficaW Na I mad Ln—r M2a2 Led— Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency, The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions. However, a screening threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e per year is based upon South Coast Air Quality Management District staff's proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary Sources emissions for industrial projects, as described in the SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans, Project related GHG's Would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, January 2018), total project related emissions would be 9,209 MTCO2e/year, as shown in the following tabie; IAB I.F 6.2-1 GHG OVIRA1 IONAI. EMISSIONS FROM IH FURNACES "PRO PWV., 4 R 53 1 3,162,28 .......... 006 W() 6 0641 Total I . — - L. . .- . .. �)1_�?09 10,00o _. - - I.-- No KEY.kg- kdagfaff v,&WOu nilhOn Br ifiSh lh(N MJ UFI"wtS, pwaids;MNAsct- fnMim mandard cukn( MT mert ic tons, No f[ ,F trlk6aon ta(V P!,door 0 ic"if vweF H(A ies,httJxd/WWWxPa KoVA41csVp oduc Tionlfifest?o 15-0'Afocuments/efn issiun- bcvors2014pk Lbtday emissions �kew ud(ulated with 7 hunares eadi with 6 %4MBtulhom fming and an avetage mate nl6l 5 rfewfew wiii nattfrd ga,., 0,050 Raf/sd heatinswdue As shown in the table, direct and indirect operational emissions associated with the project as compared to the SCAOMD's interim threshold of significance of 10,000 MTCO2e per year would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions — The General Plan FPEER (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel-powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2), The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil- based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2,, Cha, and N20, CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, January 2018), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term construction impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to Cumulative impacts is also Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 89 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Stgnificant No Impact Inca orated Impact Im act considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions --The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for"adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore, the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project involves the construction of a new 39,600 square foot industrial man ufacturinglwarehouse facility and two ancillary equipment building totaling 9,166 square feet. Operations within the new buildings would result in the net increase of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The project already incorporates several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility off-site, employee outdoor eating areas to help encourage employees to stay onsite during lunch hours. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The project site already incorporates several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that Rev 3-1-16 E1--Pg 90 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Signiricant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact provide accessibility off-site, employee outdoor eating areas to help encourage employees to stay onsite during lunch hours. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, January 2018), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered less than significant. The proposed project would have less than a significant long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD). Rev 3-1-16 E1--Pg 91 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Than Significan! Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact tm aet • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project involves the construction of a new 39,600 square foot industrial manufacturing/warehouse facility and two ancillary equipment building totaling 9,166 square feet, which is consistent with the General Plan. No other applicable pp plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Pian policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the sustainability and climate change policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant, unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, January 2018), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term, construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to GHGs from short-term construction and long-term operational cumulative impacts is also considered less than significant. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. S. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) (✓) () environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) (✓} () environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 92 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Potentia[fy With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Im ad i C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) (✓ ) () acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) (✓) ( ) (} hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( } ( ) (✓ ) (} where such a pian has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) { ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? p people g () ( ) ( ) ( ) h Expose eo le or structures to a significant risk of ✓ loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or I where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. The project site is specifically listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site per 2010 General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8.6. A Health Risk Assessment (Yorke Engineering, April 2017) identified criteria pollutants, including nitrogen oxides (NOx), Sulfur Oxides (SOx), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), particulate matter (PMio), Carbon Monoxide (CO), and toxic air contaminants (TACs) that will be produced by the 14 new gas-fired, heating furnaces to be staged in the new facility. The following tables show the emissions estimate for the identified criteria pollutants: Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 93 Initial Study for CFC 017-(10`141 City of Rancho Cucamonga 'age 27 _ .. _.. _ W.... .._......W.ww__.. .. . ...w.._w_....._......._ ............. _.. ..._w__..mw._. ......_. __.. Si',jnlfic alt r,ass Issues and Supporting Information Sources, {ynrfGa°,fl WqW,011 &gmficant tcaa &nrsNUC3G Onl22K)n227a 9r nir2 rJ12LI ,i..able 3,1: 1 AC iAnissions, tuninar•'wfoi-the New Firr°uaces INAAI�JJ!�Oqy Au* at rM15400 Factor", TAS 1tiaslsaisiaws ytta r5aacwa c 5.20 E 00 (T-01 2.24E+03 _ . (,} lV2 1 lrrl 03 1 W1l91 Totalisat al l r. Ia a atr l 7 art y spa Aromatic 11 (taarc�nlatrw. 06 7,0b F-02 ' 6(:. w�°lgwaitMtS5daphtb alene) a lalatlaal ar ,krtll�.a l i _ 2 411E-05 I I0E,-lbl _. Acrola raa 2 701-0; 2 16F-04-04 1 89 °00 Hexane ane tv.30 -03, 5.04 ;_04 4.121F,,00 l_cultacstca _m. _,,.. , ('�6F t.$2.,,... ... 93F-,t1.�... .,.... 2. y. X.y1ent, 2 721.-02 " I 8l._03 `'tltiy`AaelMJ). aaart:m-o Ptoc crlusae"fin AB 2 SS F acihtic,,9Gaa t'uaat�mnisi d Air neauuaruyr ill 6hc Annual Lull a4oflF,Ra^poiling l"zogrrurra.Deccruulaea20'1.6. llrs -la<aaawkc MPrl xf ,million ,xtaraahxd o1bic'lcct:lit hom,Yr....year, Table le 3.2; i1-Retia Pothitani Ftntsas ous Suinni,ll y for the New Ful,ft.aces i wl Factor* Max. iakuilp Annual his TAC 110i onss EnAS51011S (INAV) ()USdy'r) ire,tctia e t:'tt w,tta c Gases(RO G^,) 7.00 0,56 1,.906 N4 63,80 5 10 4M13 Ott to 6'1.641 lk(4IS 420 CO 35 00 2.1611 _.._ 2.4,528 il'C lturo 7.50 G 60 5.156 "'Su6: 6'MD.Aurmu, l lr.elatawting(aw R' °Cenral delaGiOis lrtr ewtcna d caazualatumirm,othe.s eclaalpinew I Q NIN4 S1ru luu NO, V,laa#st'd Ov&lee Beat Av:uaUdc,Control lechnology(BA(A)ataivaluarel of 50 p aos [hey,aaarlhon(pimn) 11as:- pri'llmd",: wl7fhra- GMwa4laon('tarmilla1 crrkalc fa.ea.In --Iron. yaa...ytar. The report theta compared project emissions rate against CEQA thresholds for Maximum Individual Cancer Risk (MICR), Jon-Cancer Hazard Index, Chronic (HIC)„ and Non- Cancer Hazard Index, Acllte (HIA) and concluded that all emissions and health risks are compliant with relevant SCAQMD CEt A requirements, The following table compares the project's emissions rate against the CEtA thresholds: Rev 3-1-16 El—Pg 94 ............ Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 ess Than &gnifir"W Less Wth Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: sqntficant Wfgafton spgnfkam No Table, I-1:HRA Summary Ifindth Ris*)*dox Rr_cqA6rJ,`�,0,p NA 3,40L4Y8 I 00E-06 Below Indi6dual Cantvi Sm5ft'i've ...... .... Risk(MICR) Off"-,'swayW (Aplace N/A 7,38E-08 100E-06 Below.. Non-Caxim IlAzmd Residenfial/ Respitatosy 1,30 E 04 1 (X) Belou, In4ex.,Oironic Sensitive, -8(_ii E_-_03 -1-0"0............—Be-lo—ul 7------ ............_1_.. Non-Cancer II id Eye &WE-03 I (A Below Inthm,Acute(RIA) Furthermore, The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full set-vice Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State, The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process Of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, Implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection d) and compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. b) As stated in subsection a), the project site is specially stated as a hazardous waste or Substance materials site per 2010 General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8.6. A Health Risk Assessment (Yorke Engineering, April 2017) specifically identified criteria pollutants, including nitrogen oxides (NOx), Sulfur Oxides (SOx), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), particulate matter (PMo), Carbon Monoxide (CO), and toxic air contaminants (TACE) that will be produced by the 14 new gas-fired, heating furnaces to be staged in the new facility. Best practice mitigation measures will be conditioned to limit the potential accidental impact of hazardous materials and their odors from adjacent sites, Furthermore, the City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The site is substantially surrounded by existing industrial uses and there are are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project will be required to comply with existing State and Federal standards on the use and transport of any hazardous materials to avoid contamination of school sites outside the 1/4 mile boundary. No impacts are anticipated, d) The project site is listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site per 2010 General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8.6. The 2010 General Plan FPEIR identifies facilities in the City that handle hazardous materials and has a high potential for, or known release of hazardous substances into the ground, groundwater, or surface waters. Additionally, the General Plan also establishes that existing facilities that are listed may be developed Rev 3-1-16 El—Pg 95 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated I Impact Impact further in the future. With the implementation of the following mitigation measures established in the 2010 General Plan FPEIR, no impacts are anticipated: 1) Future development and redevelopment shall comply with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act regarding the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste; the management of non-hazardous solid wastes; and underground tanks that store petroleum and other hazardous substances. As part of this Act, corrective action by the owner or operator of the leaking underground storage tank (LUST) or clean up of LUSTs by the USEPA would reduce hazards associated with ground and water contamination by tank leaks, spills, or accidental releases. 2) Future development and redevelopment shall comply with the California Hazardous Waste Control Act, which regulates facilities that generate or treat hazardous wastes. Permits for individual facilities allow the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and/or the Certified Unified Program Agency ,(CUPA, in this case the San Bernardino County Fire Department) to inspect the facilities for compliance and to enforce the provision of the Act. 3) As the designated CUPA, the San Bernardino County Fire Department shall implement the State and Federal regulations for all future development and redevelopment related to: • Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventories (Business Plans) • California Accidental Release Prevention Program • Underground Storage Program • Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act Program • Hazardous Waste Generator and On-site Hazardous Waste Treatment Programs • California Uniform Fire Code: Hazardous Material Management Plans and Hazardous Material Inventory Statements. 4) Future development and redevelopment shall comply with the California Accidental Release Prevention Program (CalARP), which prevents the accidental release of regulated toxic and flammable substances. It does so by requiring stationary sources using hazardous materials that exceed a threshold quantity to develop and submit a Risk Management Plan that addresses the potential impacts of accidental hazardous materials releases and that includes measures to reduce hazards through prevention, response, and remediation measures. e) The site is located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 but is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 2.9 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area Rev 3-1-16 E1--Pg 96 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 30 Less Than Significant Less PotentiallyWith Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: slg6ficant Mitigation significant. No Impact Inco orated Impact Im act according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. The overall height of the building is 73 feet and complies with the overall maximum building height allowed per the Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Mead & Hunt, April 2011). No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project site includes three points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge O (✓} O { ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) { ) (} (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land .uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) (✓) { ) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) { } ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( } (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (✓} { ) ( ) Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 97 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 31 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Significant No -impact Incorporated Impact Impact g} Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( } (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( } (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) () ( } (✓} loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) () ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by (Land Development Design Company, LLC in July 2016), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. ,Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and Rev 3-1-16 E3—Pg 98 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 32 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation. Significant No Impact: Incorporated Im act Impact porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans-that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants ,entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control,additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and. implemented' for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur-either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through, a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must'be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the•site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to'comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post-Construction Operational 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including .a project description :and identifying. Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used onsite to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Rev 3-1-16. E1—Pg 99 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 33 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impart Impact 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water'is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVVVD has .plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building proposed on the site; .however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river, All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project site includes. existing landscaping. of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan.must be approved by the Building Official.and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any streamor river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The.project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff.because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with ,the construction period could result im a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The project involves' the construction of a new 39,600 square foot industrial manufacturing/warehouse-facility and two ancillary equipment building totaling 9,166 square feet. Therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize Rev 3-1-16 E1--Pg 100 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 34 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources; significant Mitigation Significant Na Impact Incorporated Impact Im act water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a), less than significant impacts are anticipated. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (Walden and Associates, January 2018) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. i g) No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Pian Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project- a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) () (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The proposed project is located on an existing in-fill site located at 11711 Arrow Route within the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District. The site is characterized by industriallwarehousing developments to the south, west and east. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding industriallwarehouse developments. The project will become a part of the larger industrial community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Heavy Industrial (H1). The Heavy Industrial (HI) land use designation permits a wide range of intensive industrial activities and ancillary office uses. The proposed manufacturing and warehouse use of the project is consistent Rev 3-1-16 El—Pg 101 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Sfgni@cant Mitigation significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The project site is located roughly in the southeastern quadrant of the City in an area previously developed with industrial/warehousing facilities. The City maintains extensive open space and conservation areas along the northern boundary and northwestern quadrant. The location of the project site is far from the City's conservation and open space area. As such, the proposed project is consistent with the zoning designation established in the Development Code for the purpose of mitigating environmental impacts. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of {Tants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral { ) () ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important { ) O O (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( } ( ) ( ) {✓} levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in (} {✓) ( } ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? I Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 102 Initial Study for DRC2017=00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 36 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With . Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact lm act e) For a project located within an airport:land use plan,or, O O (} (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; O O O (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area.to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The proposed project is located on an existing in-fill site located at 11711 Arrow Route within the 'Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District. Per the Development Code section 17.66.110, the maximum level of noise permissible at the lot line is 85 dBA: The project site is located along Arrow Route, which is identified in the General Plan as generating ambient noise of up to 70 dBA. The project site is substantially surrounded by industrial uses generating ambient noise levels of varying levels. A Noise Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, July 2017) found that current ambient noise levels at the property project site property line is 91.0 dBA, 6 dBA above the maximum permittable level. Construction noise is expected to increase the total dBA noise levels at the property line to 95.4 dBA. However, the report also recommended the implementation of temporary noise barriers along the property lines. Noise barriers along the property line is expected to reduce the total noise level to 80.4 dBA, below the noise level threshold established per the Development Code. Operational noise generated by the new buildings is expected to be at 68.5 and will not substantially impact the overall ambient noise level's. Noise levels are expected to return to and remain at 91 dBA once all noise barriers have been removed. Therefore, the proposed project is not expected to increase exposure of persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established with the following mitigation measure: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-relates! noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction.,The Plan shall implement noise barriers to reduce the total level of noise at the project site property lines below the 85 dBA threshold. 2) All future on-site activities shall adhere to the City's noise standards. Noise levels shall not.exceed 85 dBA at the lot line. b) The proposed construction of the project is expected to generate noise and vibration in excess of the existing ambient levels. The Noise Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, July 201.7) concluded that noise impacts resulting from construction equipment can be reduced to less than significant levels with the implementation of temporary noise mufflers, barriers and blankets. The Noise Technical Report also concluded that operation noise levels will not substantially increase noise impacts. Furthermore, the City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed building; hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby uses is expected. With the mitigation measures implemented in subsection a, less: than significant impacts are expected. Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 103 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 37 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in the Traffic Impact Analysis Scope of Work Memorandum (Linscott, Law & Greenspan, September 2017); it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. The Noise Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, July 2017) found that cumulative onsite operational noise levels at the property line is currently measured at 91.0 dBA. The operational noise generated by the facility's operation after final buildout of the project is expected to be approximately 68.5 dBA. The facility's operations would not contribute substantially to the total sound level and the cumulative operation noise level at the property line is expected to remain unchanged at 91 dBA. Therefore, the project is will not contribute a substantial amount of ambient noise to the project vicinity. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.110, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the. construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic maul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote maul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is located within the Ontario Airport Land Use.Plan but is not within 2 miles of the Ontario airport. The site is located approximately 2.9 miles northwest of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The site is not within the Noise Impact.Zone as defined by the Ontario Airport Land Use Plan. Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to Rev 3-1-16 E 1—Pg 104 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 38 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact aircraft operations. Per the ONT ALUCP, a real estate disclosure is required. No adverse impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either O O O (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, O O ( } (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating O O O (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a developed area with predominantly industrial and warehouse uses and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short- term and will .not attract new employees to the area. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No significant impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is located in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MIIHI) District and is an existing industrial manufacturing and warehousing facility. There are no existing residential housing units on the site. Therefore, there will be no displacement of housing or people and no adverse impact is expected. C) The project site is located in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (Ml/HI) District and is an existing industrial manufacturing and warehousing facility. There is currently no residential housing or residents living onsite. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. 1.4. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) )=ire protection? O O ( } (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) () ( ) (✓) C) Schools? O O O (✓) d) Parks? O ( ) O (✓} e) Other public facilities? O O (� (✓) Rev 3-1-16 E1--Pg 105 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 39 Less Than significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: S€gnificant Mitigatlon Significant No Impact, Inca orated Impact Impact Comments: a) The site, located south of Arrow Route and west of Rochester Avenue, would be served by the existing Fire Station 174, located approximately half a mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is the Rancho Cucamonga Adults Sports Park on the other side of Arrow Route facing the site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Paris Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) { ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) O O (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Rev 3-1-16 1=1—Pg 106 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 40 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Slgnlficant With Significant No Impact Incur orated Impact Im act Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is the Rancho Cucamonga Adults Sports Park located on the other side of Arrow Route facing the site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 96. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓} establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with. an applicable congestion management ( } O ( } (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( } ( ) ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) { ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? O () O (✓) t) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs { ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) The project involves the construction of a new 39,600 square foot industrial manufacturing/warehouse addition and two ancillary equipment buildings totaling 9,166 square feet, which is consistent with the General Plan. The site is currently developed with 333,862 square feet of manufacturing, warehouse and office space and adjacent to existing industrial and warehouse facilities. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Implementation of the proposed project is forecasted to generate 21 trips in the a.m. peak hour, 22 trips in the p.m. peak hour, and 176 daily trips. Rev 3-1-16 El-Pg 107 L- Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 41 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No lm act Incorporated Im act Impact When converted to passenger car equivalent trips, the total number generated is 37 trips in the a.m. peak hour, 38 trips in the p.m, peak hour, and 263 daily trips (Sapphos Environmental, September 2017), as shown in the following table: Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 108 ....................-- Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 42 Less'Pian Signill cant Less potentialiY ill, T1.1 I Issues and Supporting Information Sources, Significant Mitigation Significant No _LmI22t Incorpof,aled km)art PRomsm Ntoimi TRip GENERATIoN FoRECASV ITE Land Use Code I Daily AM beak Hour I'll Peak Honr Total EH projed lyescriptiou 2 Way Et xiisit ia"tal !!rqlLqy 140,Manufachning(14,485 Sf)' U pa%sengef Cats 29 5 2 7 3 4 7 L! 2-Axle Truck,� 0 0 0 0 0 0 :3 3-AxIeThick5 2 0 0 0 0 0 1) U 4+Axlelrucks 22 3 1 4 1 3 4 1.54.Wai Phousing S1 * TIMSenges Cars 9, 4 15 2 4 6 * 2.Axle Tnickr.., 4 1 0 1 0 1 1 �J 3-Axle,'Irucks 6 1 0 1 1 1 J 4+Axle Tnicks 16 2 1 3 1 2 3 .......... ........... TotalPropoyed Gross Ltig Cepserotjokm-J'orerayt 176 16 5 21 7 is 'Q ?Lq 140:'Marrufacturing 114,05 ST) Cl T125'sengel Cant's :011 -5 2 7 3 4 7 * 2-Axle Tnxks 3 0 0 T) 0 0 0 * 3-Axle ltuckr,, 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZI 44Axle lrocks 66 9 3 12 3 9 12 150:Warehousing 133,894 S1 D Passenger Cars 95 4 1 5 2 4 6 Q 2-Axle Trucks 6 2 0 2 0 2 2 Ll 3-Aislel'nic*5 12 2 0 2 a 44AxItTmeks 49 6 3 9 3 6 9 Total Propowd PCE Trip(;*ueratlan F` evast W 28 19 37 11 27 38 The City Engineer reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis Scope of Work Memorandum submitted for the project (Sapphos Environmental, September 2017) and concurs with the report's findings. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with existing street improvements. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. All intersections are expected to operate at LOS D or better per the City's General Plan, This standard serves as a foundation for providing a street network that moves people and goods safely and efficiently throughout the community, while ensuring that traffic delays are minimized. Additionally, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permits. The Rev 3-1-16 El—Pg 109 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 43 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing. All arterials and intersections will maintain a minimum Level of Service D and above by year 2040, which meets the City's minimum Level of Service standard for all roadways. The project site has existing street improvements {curb, gutter, and sidewalk} along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. C) Located approximately 2.9 miles northeast of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project site has existing street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk)along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not alter street design nor does it add any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project site currently has typical features to support transportation and vehicle trip reduction. Sidewalks are provided along both the Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue street frontages to improve pedestrian access to the site. The site also has an adequate number of bicycle racks consistent with the parking standards established per the City's Municipal Code (17.64.100) and meets the City's goal of implementing bicycle parking at all sites with new development.. No impacts to public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities are anticipated as a result. 17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with the cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California.Register of O O O (✓) Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1 (K)? b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its ( } (✓) () ( ) discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 6024.1 In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. � Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 110 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 44 Lass Than Significant Less Potentlally With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation I Significant No Impact laccriocrated Impact Impact Comments: a) As defined in Public Resources Code 21074 and. applying the criteria located in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 (subdivision c), the project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation).A Cultural Resources Assessment (Sapphos Environmental, July 2017) was performed on the project site. The study consists of an archaeological record search of available resources, including the California Office of Historic Preservation and the Office of Historic Preservation. The California Historical Resources information System at the South Central Costal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton was also consulted. The records search did not identify any previously recorded cultural resources within the project site. However, a total of 4 resources were identified within a one quarter mile search of the project site. The study also included an intensive field survey of the project site. Employees of Sapphos Environmental, Inc. visited the site on March 7, 2017, reviewed buildings and site features to evaluate the integrity of existing building and structures and evaluate it for historical significance. The site consists primarily of steel- framed industrial and warehouse buildings dating back the early 1970s. The survey of the property determined that the facility has no architectural merit of any significance and did not contribute materially to American industrial, scientific or technological history. The study concluded that the facility as a whole is not eligible for listing as a historical resource. The study also included consultation with Native American Heritage Commission and a requested review of the Sacred Lands Files to determine if any recorded Native American sacred sites or locations of religious or ceremonial importance are present within one mile of the project site. The review of the Sacred Lands File did not indicate the presence of any sacred sites or locations of religious or ceremonial importance within the search radius. The study concludes with the absence of cultural resources in the current project area and surrounding vicinity, no additional cultural work is recommended. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) In conformance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, A Cultural Resources Assessment (Sapphos Environmental, July 2017) was performed on the project site. The study consists of an archaeological record search of available resources, including the California Office of Historic Preservation and the Office of Historic Preservation. The California Historical Resources Information System at the South Central Costal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton was also consulted. The records search did not identify any previously recorded cultural resources within the project site. However, a total of 4 resources were identified within a one quarter mile search of the project site. The study also included an intensive field survey of the project site. Employees of Sapphos Environmental, Inc. visited the site on March 7, 2017, reviewed buildings and site features to evaluate the integrity of existing building and structures and evaluate it for historical significance. The site' consists primarily of steel-framed industrial and warehouse buildings dating back the early 1970s. The survey of the property determined that the facility has no architectural merit of any significance and did not contribute materially to American industrial, scientific or technological history. The study concluded that the facility as a whole is not eligible for listing as a historical resource. The study also included consultation with Native American Heritage Commission and a requested review of the Sacred Lands Files to determine if any recorded Native American sacred sites or locations of religious or ceremonial importance are present within one mile of the project site. The review of the Sacred Lands File did not indicate the presence of any sacred sites or locations of religious or ceremonial importance within the search radius. The study concludes with the absence of cultural resources in the current Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 111 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 45 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Significant No tm act Incorporated Impart tm act project area and surrounding vicinity, no additional cultural work is recommended. No adverse impacts are anticipated. In conformance with Assembly Bill 52 (AB52), staff sent a Tribal Consultation Request on January 11, 2018, of the proposed project to the following Tribal Communities who had requested to be notified: San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians arid the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. Following the prescribed timelines for AB52, staff did not receive any requests for consultation. Should any undocumented archaeological or cultural resources be discovered during grading activities, adherence to the following mitigation measures listed below will ensure that all impacts will be less than significant: 1) If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. 2) In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, all Native American tribes previously contacted during the Tribal Consultation process will be re-contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment,so as to provide Tribal input. 3) If significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2016), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, an SOI- qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to all Native American tribes previously contacted for review and comment. a. All in-field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored by a representative of a Native American tribe previously contacted during the Tribal Consultation process. b. Prior to disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the project, all Native American tribes previously contacted during the Tribal Consflltation process will be consulted. Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 112 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 46 Less Than Signiticanl Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation SigniScant No Impact Incorporated Im act Im act i i 18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( } ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( } (✓) () water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the O O O (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) () () (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( } ( ) ( } (✓} capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 113 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 47 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Upland. The current daily water usage in the CVWD service area is approximately 41.7 million gallons per day (mgd). Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed. Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent. Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for projects that exceed the following sizes: 1) Residentiai development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) snipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet; 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet; 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms; 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet; 6) mixed use project including one or more of the projects specified above; 7) any other project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or greater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit project; and 8) any project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system. Under SB 221, a Water Supply Assessment is required when: 1)A project that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) a project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system; and 3) applies to development agreements that Include such subdivision. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal.needs. Additional landfills will not be needed to accommodate the project's waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 114 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 48 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Significant No impact Incorporated Impact Impact 19. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the O (✓ ) O (} quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( } () ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Both the project site and the area surrounding the site consists of developed, urbanized land consistent with the General Plan. The site has been largely graded over and consists primarily of asphalt and concrete surfaces. A Biological Resources Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, July 2017) identified 103 special status species considered to be endangered, threatened or deemed of special concern at the Federal level and by the State of California. No special status species was identified at the project site. Several common avian species were detected but were judged to be common wildlife and of low biological value. No sensitive plant communities or habitats were found within the project site. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources. Therefore, development will not adversely reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Development on the site is also unlikely to eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). The project site is not listed in the California Office of Historic Preservation's Register of Historic Resources. Furthermore, a Cultural Resources Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, July 2017) was prepared for the project site. The report concluded that the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse changes to historical resources. However, mitigation measures have been incorporated (see Cultural Resources section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures) in the event that archaeological and/or paleontological resources are discovered during course of grading or construction onsite. Therefore, mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts to historical resources are at less-than-significant levels. I Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 115 Initial Study for DRC2017-00141 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 49 Less Than j Significant Less jPotentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Pian Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. The proposed development of the site is consistent with intended land use as designated in the General Plan. All applicable mitigation measures, including air & water quality, greenhouse gases, cultural resources and noise, and have been imposed to mitigate and reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. Combined together with all other developments in the City, the project is consistent with the finding of the General Plan Program FEIR and the Statement of Overriding Considerations. Therefore, no cumulative impacts are anticipated with inclusion of the proposed project. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, January 2018) that utilizes CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.1) to evaluate short-term construction emissions for Regional and localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions was prepared for the project. As stated in the Air Quality Section, proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels to less than significant levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed, The Noise Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, July 2017) identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. The study reviewed the potential noise levels generated by construction of the proposed project and ongoing operations after buildout. The report concluded that with the proposed mitigation measures (see Noise section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures), the elevated construction noise levels created would be reduced to less than significant. Therefore, mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure air quality and noise impacts are at less-than-significant levels. j Rev 3-1-16 i E1—Pg 116 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2017-00141 Page 50 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (✓) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (✓) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (✓) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) ( ) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) ( ) Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18, EIR (SCH#93102055, certified June 15, 1994) (} Victoria Planned Community EIR (Certified May 20, 1981) () Terra Vista Planned Community EIR (SCH#81082808, certified February 16, 1983) ( ) Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan EIR (SCH#87021615, certified September 16, 1987) ( } Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH#82061801, certified July 6, 1983) { ) Etiwanda North Specific Plan EIR (SCH #89012314, certified April 1, 1992) (✓} Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Sapphos Environmental, Inc, July 14, 2017) (✓) Cultural Resources Assessment (Sapphos Environmental, Inc, July 11, 2017) (✓} Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, Inc,.January 12, 2018) (✓} Noise Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, Inc, July 11, 2017) (✓} Health Risk Assessment (Yorke Engineering, LLC, April 17, 2017) Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 117 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2017-00141 Page 51 (✓) Biological Resources Technical Report (Sapphos Environmental, Inc, July 11, 2017) (✓) Traffic Impact Analysis Scope of Work Memorandum (Linscott, Law & Greenspan, September 6, 2017) (✓) Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Walden and Associates, January 2017) Rev 3-1-16 E1—Pg 118 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2017-00141 Page 52 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. i acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clear/ ,n significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: �� Date: February 16, 2018 Print Name and Title: J�mes Yost, AIA, Senior Architect and Associate Rev 3-1-16 C E 0 0 u �f cn z CN 13 > 0 OVII, r co0 .2 a) .. .0 %fill 0 0 CL o ¢ > O 0 j A N �A to to En U) U) r_ ro 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z A-) LD Qui W CD LL 0 (1) > i ac R LO CL tis 0 i,i r- 04- .1. 0 rrQ) W 0 0) Li C) ca UNRi Lu z 0 4 0 0 A,li 0 0 rLp F- ED (D cl ❑ 40 CL 0. -0 w r- in (D -0 (1) M (D r_ w w a - - _0 w 0 a 0 o 0 kt;N 0 a) r- amity - a) -0 — E 3: ca S ZD CL r- -- U) -6 E 0. E cn U) Z 0 0 Q. M a) Ij to 2 .9 mn a) CL 0 .5 U) tn cn ca (n 0 0 W 0 ,0 M M 0 U) cr > a) m 0 r -0 0 (D 0 r cnz- a) E6 0 E Q- (a :Ei 2 ca I (L) " D) M E r- cu — U) CD -0 0 .9- (a Q) > LD r (() 0 - (1) - 0 ao) u L) :3 a 0. W a kag C.0 J- tn 0 0 U) co vi(D 2 M -a cu 0 CD r_ >1 L) :3 4V p -0 w En E a) a) co co C? to -0 W c =3 u) o E Z CD 0 r ;a .�2 AOZ :� - — U) o :3 a- 0 (n :3 (D 0 m E a) a) LO -a " 0 Ei u) E U) :5 c in E c E C� " 0 _0 (D 0 " a) r_ a) :3 CL (D CL CL 0 2 'v -m (D u) cn.2- Q) o (n -D 0 (D > r:; 0 — C: :3 Q) — — U) a) (D > -Fu -0 a) d) cn :3 6 12 CL m m (n d) 0. 0) (1) C -0 CL M M a Z- 0-= -0 cm C Cn 2 10 D o U) L) M a) m 0 Z M • T C5 :�, (n (a -- (D ❑ N r- r- tm U) E m -in- E .0 a) [a , 0 In a) tn > -E -0 C) U) o to cn 0 Lo G3 > E a) (1) CL >It Y) .9 :3 CO 0 a 0 0 0. CD 0 z LD r-: Cc a) 0 co a) p 0 w IL i3 C%4 > — :3 a) E w 7FD 0 U) cn— 0 CU -0 C) a) c: t tn C (D U E 0 E- n", 0 d) I= S (n 0 > > (v > 0 'R 'oL QJ r -p -,,(, cam `' w a) = CL c 0 - r_ alli (a E Ss ar-) CLD' �3 CD a) 0 to i = C) a) r_ '0 CL cn 2 cu 0 — a) 0 U) CD x L) 0 = r_ C CL dJ 'ro -1- 0 V — 0 -0 o = .- o a) E < w 0 < (D 0 co r N M LO El-Pg 920 ar v � c O Ia w — CCL E 0U v c 0o v zt v zt :,It U) Z cC N N N N N N N N "q' d' 0 (Sf M = O C w a) L w+ CD M c 45 O m O ... Q a a s a a a s a Q Q C O U N w w w w to w w w Q C C C C C C C. G C G 3 = d d CL Q. d EL n. fL a- C w O O oO O O O O O O O 0 O a) a) a) a) w S E � > > > a a, (D a) a) a) n) a, m a) (1) m i— a rx ❑ M rn C u r O a) O •" O N O 2nLL. U U m U U U U U U U U cc cma m =_ o U) ._ 0 0 Q:E aN) I.. O O O ❑ O O O O O O O Q' w Oq m m d m in m m m m m W >,.r- a) -0 (a 4-- (D -O ❑ a) 3 s m a a) c a) — 'o a) -0 ° V, - ° �, n) 00 = 3 � 3 ro w ° a (6 0 0- Ma L L co a) L C N Q) a) V U C- w �a `�' `t O CO w a O a N aa)) O E m Y CL cu ai w u' a) � � a) T w ° oa a) _ > > � � o � CU c Q a) c E 'E — ° a) .c °) > ° Q a) a) u°)i o a) �, ai .G m o a c EoyCD r-rnca o ° (ten w �+ aa'i � E � o �cu o ° rn � f a) o � o � �'- a) ° � p ? G3 C.) — o ° w � 0 � O o o -0 (a c _ A (ti Q. C ° cu �1 x Co c L O O w0 a) w a C U Ca i3 o -- E `� � oai }, ° v, m -00 co ° vL cna a) o x ° c " U •+ L U C1 w = a) _ — t✓ Q) L ° w fn of o � O p � w tCa Un O m ° U � a O G E O O cu CD a) n � a) O .0 w 3 ° to O M ° p QOj y A O m N Im C 0 (D O (0 Q) G C U 3 = .0 (� G .0 �+ IC � M a) G a ca ° a) � 3 ° wL G (a c — a c0.) - a. ° ws � o Q o, '-a ° ro oa) a) U) C cCa E 0 V 5 L ° rn� c M (D � � �, C � � .— • . O G aGi a) 0 o Tc -O O L i+ •i-1 (V L) 1 Y = a � (a ° :/ .� V L 4-1 y (n 4Y a) •Y .�• 7 va G y c 3 w C 0 CL � L ,c O 0- x � c {n -0 o CLA co Q U Q ❑ C ° C N �0— C C —' (n C T w p L (n w w 0 a N U a) C CP O v, a) n Q, U O a) V a) N w I9 a) O G a) C w > (o w O L O .0 a) a) co c �w) � O � ° E o2E CL Era ` w ° D a) 0M (� � z > > � E � �' Uw � w «� U) N u i Q ❑. c) N a m O (� `p � co o O 0 v a. O d w O fA O 'c] ❑ (a CO a) !~ a) •o G N U O U '� O C -2 C 0 C Q 'Q (n U Q C > 0 4) C O ° L is C O D — N Q U O O CL U) a) a) � 0wa) Qw < CL mn Qc� c) a C0.2 co rl- co rn ET--Pg 121 m U L O ° !� c E ° v t c ca O U) z 2 'o 'c 1 L rt+ a3 � ❑ Q Q _ C m 0 . E � W 'F.. � � 4 Q Q Q Q Q Q C C C C C C C C C O O O O O p O O ° U U U U U U U U U i 7 :3 7 3 7 7 ti U U U UUO U rnCDcm m 01 m 0) 0) cm m U •� 'L •�-.. 1� L L L L L •L L tm LO C r 0 d O 7 CO C trd � Li U U U U U U U U U c6 a. a� B `o U) O O a) L O QI D C❑ 1 O a) a) ❑ 'O a) � •� m N 0 C C al �+ m tb � a o ro � oo ° `� � ., ' c 'c. ca rnca o E � a+ � Q " '� ° � m � a� aEs � ro ' a m o 3 N 1— m Q a) L cn 00 — i a) a) cn y- o co r o m ca m o CL a) Cl)' co o o 0 '3 ° ° 3 � U � O ° N o co a' Qul = a) a- 0 QO) C w O a) Co U M aa)i a) °- C N O O HO m a) U W O U Vi N O '4- ca C N L c6 - .2 C l C LI +.� En L V7 O a) ca t En 'j O Q 7 O O ° G m a) cu _ .0 N CO O N Q) `� Y N NCO O 0- tn C m.� O v U C C a) a) U C 3: U C N CU a) a) a C� U N C V O O- a) a) O C N O 'D m '7 +`. a) ca O rA t+) c�a `$ .'` 7 p .— cll O +� N Z m 0 n - a) w a) rn 3: c: 0O cn U) O 7 O m O E C 'O Vl C O m C m a) .0 L cU -0 (a .N G fa O C =C ca (U Q a) m ` o (a (a CO ccu) — 0)CaMA v°ic � cD E ° N � �+ � � EES � U) N V O L O a) Q Nr +� O 010 'N O O ` O C O C L O O O a O L "6 E O C O ° N '�m ❑ ' C 4 fa m L a�, Q � � ca � � .5 ,;, � ca :. a) ao � afU m � ° a) o a' cai '— m o o cac ui G OOE U7 PNCC2 EL = � � _ cn cu r U) jn d o U d C 7 N f` 'a C C7 a U "O U t1] � E y O W w a) o d o � � � U ° U — ro c o : os r ° as o � .N c c mE . . c°nCU cr) Ucnm .Eaa)) � as � a � cno Ea) aa� o � cu — CL E cv c� en co ti r r r r r r r EI-Pg 122 L2 L� ] a ° � 13- Lw m O co M co CD ,r ?',.ire. c a Y !]- ty_• f ��.F 4; s f'S C) U N N (n N N N N m m ca aS ca C G C d d fl IL k'iic "' O O O O w U U O O O O Oi hk m 3 3 3 3 §�` qf- - ly LO O ?' a] LL V U U U U L 1 i�r kY3 "Y vr, �•'. F— a a 0 r.L C xr (U 7 3 a] U m .O v) (a _ .� w C N C D N O ;�' O D O U Sa t a) L C U m O .' Yid L cn +- U N vi O N L7 O X C O d 3 ' C i 7� N C C O �N O X O N N N L-- a) m U N O V O <y. : O O O L C O N O O ca a) m ,N . a) O (n G a) C a) Q O 'O O L � (� c a) a� »� a m a) v E a) o N N '� w vi 7 ` V ` j ° O N a) m rt sect. Q' a7 a) C (a _ m L a) N a) t] - N U C O cEn o "" NN o a3nY a: AN ° al C f!1 ' V "- N in sr _ Dia a � — C '� E o v—i c) M — - a) 3 �' � �' y E m snnn,�g %'"sfi 11. a) N U N U N N +. �,cl O g Q. O a �-.' E (a G1 m Q) N a) N .� C CLC a) COa) 'p a) ¢ N ¢ r Q a U D m = ° ¢ c E o EEa) � Ea) Em — C) _0oc O O a) (a C M O cm() O -Cu a) a) 4. C `r O E a) O ° VO 04 p U m E m _ (a ° _� U - o o c o o a) ° as ai U a) n N 3 .� R) v). Z *' r M C C ro p .� O O Q) U Q m m U A. O N E " L N O ! g r O L O OI LL N N C 7 0 C L •a (D "O N Q m C L) C- O O a) a (0 'O U W m II• m 12 c M C a) .� Y m O (n m C ca : C N 601 5[B�J C: U y _ a) cn _ a) ca ca a) c a) a) 2 • o ca ca d1 Q M N = • � C C O a) N () 3 Cn •3 d N L, D (0 ` O �--' .m is ca "" D 7, a) m `' (a O Q C u) Nv C C L O) 7, 7 C C — C O L- O C O ++ +. — U 3 m e N c � c N 6 « c a) m a c . m • g L N L :o; W O N N O c 0 .� C ' m N E o N E ca O (a "6 ry D a) N V ?' m in vN -pc L ° 'Q L c 3Eo m 0 C C O Q L Q L C N C C) C .� O a+ N O tC O m m 070L1 O L der 'y< o m o � E o E o am ' — N $ T N c U) c c a) � c L °O D ° � � o o E — o � � — a) - (D o o — o o � v � L cl f• , E0. E ° cA Ucn0 � a) Q Q— o Q -o Qu7 QL) Qu.) o — QU ¢ � m o .� :~ ca k, E co o t- N mNr N N N N N E1—Pg 123 m o CLE 0 0 m o W z co Cf) ro N Cf) N R � C d �«- O G) � > d O 'p c0 0 .0 t w CD CD a a a s a O O O o .0 0 CL CL CLv � CL0 0 tl O O O O C V O CD (O 7 w N N N (D CLW F- > X w (CO OU t3) Lr) G V O O Z) Ln 2 tL- U U U m U a m c ,N a 0 0 O O O m aNi L D O D ❑ ❑ N N Y N O lU [� C O t77 U (D N .N Y O) O (0 •- `� C.) .0 U U N C N C C C N w lll i) (D U U O1 C +-. N O t5 (O U , (D Y N ' QI G O N „- O O C r D] 0 Ol N O O O CO 47 p E CL--= •• .� c d L � O p p 0 ? ro 0 til n o n Q O E p o ip — p O O fa 0 o C. o � 0 N .0 O E E u) cn CD N U C O 0 :'_' N .0 ro N U "b E O O ro O U) "� O C X- E C_ U U tn O to m (D3 O 0. ILO +L.. +L.. OQ .� C t7IN � CL +L... Q` []. U Ib U C C U �-- m � tn 0 m E c � 4 o ao c •o aa) CL cu U � � . o � � p O 7 4_ U O ro C O O ' t7).0 N to O@ O C C_+ •C A� api ° ' roc- tY � '4 »' U cca�ii° a� a _m•`E t3) c � mQ•- c L O - co r- N U O O UO , r+ C O !Z N CU ,O 0 W :t N O r% O N C p)OLLI O C n Q U SO O C U p O .- � p U E E O ro t„ C cy [O f0 N U - N �, N 7 L .. 0 .- 6 Ql C ch U N U C .0 7,.V E o a .6 o 0- 4)•O N N A) o E � (LOcr, C N a) O N 7+� p [O +. _' O C L .0 O LO to � - til to C O d) O U) = U E 'O .� C C .0 � L .- = o Q) — O o C to O C C E �, C C .- L �+ N - 7 to ro O O O Q O C U p C — a) .0 N N o (� N f0 C 0n Q) V1 '� -in- @ � � N � � caoU � � ' � � rorocro00E '> to Q a L D O C O L C '= to L ` 2 0 p ,ro 'o p L Q- c a) 0 R1 O C .c a) V Q c 'c o 0 c C rn Q O s '� o rn O c cl L +-� f0 N aro c o o a`` W �, o ro U �' cn 0. ro � cn °l 0 f0 .� M in o f E .� E ro E (A5 ro m E Lca c c E c .. 0o roEU) CL E — roves m co • • • • ch.2 .r CL E r. — T E 1-Pg 124 v c E 0 0 i N Z N .41 J1'L� L •F+ s"'y'i o V l a a a ❑ ❑ r ;M 0 0 0 0 0 A3 CL C_ CL o_ a m c c O r o 0 00 0 ` ° t� _ t7 U L m ani ai }' d � N N i h' 0 .�{� r O a) p±i 0 ` U M LL 00 m Of] ❑ D 'f CJ c c PxSa�1 0 0 �,u CL Ln d Lo ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑� [ m � 4 0- m oocvoocQc� c � cLO v, -o cap ca -0 — cc - o -ao L LpN w G C •� U '� .` 'C C O +�• �.' —5 O O '� c0 a) Ur`vis.� c 2 .5 a� i� cn 3 o v ca ro — s 0 - 2 .5 " �, � E o o Eo °, m oma. vo Q° a� E a� a CL LM tM O L c tri c c ai N c (D L = n "'� L Q N a) C_ N 0 E o � c� � � N 'C � co � 7 �Y � O i :D m U 0 � �s� d O U//� '� = CL ° -0 c w m N 0 .— c *� E E ' L u) co SLE a, a� 0 -0 � E � a� ? 00 u rn L0 a) 0 o Zoe �' ° -E � " 0 � viUE � � � "vo �'--� � � a� � L " ° a) = L C � � C_ _ c� '3 c � N -o a .. 0 C ? 3 E Q ro a 04- -CL � � ° E c '0 � (1) D a) ° o '- c 0 -0 � 0 � �E � ; 0moo ,. QN �A °, o �• � � c -0Nom? c E3 (D m 'oco C1- 7 Leo N 0 w 0 O O, ca c o 'c 7 m QI o C L O N O c `;�; O` 0 oU > 'a� � o —_ z� ' aim? o f � � rn Q w a � ° � 0 � oQa ` coo ° o ` o •ca ° � a? N � E � vOo o ° o aim a) -o O (D L a) c9 C M I` r-. N cW O aNj - +. CD N '—. C u, -0 O S O L > r u, C_ CO) O U R3 � va, � � ° � v � oom o ° y .5; c) �� p C 'U) �' o MEoSm � o O •d, L L O 0 R L L Q) -O '� Q) 'C N "C +_� a) •c O N C C ..-. o � aj— 2— v, c _ tea cv a' r- 0i u � m cv c � a ° � o �' E � .3 � sL° CD rn N C ° m C. C_ CD o m m O C_ Q to p .0 0 aJ E N N vim, : N (L4 x�. 'm p L- O c — C 0- C c W ._ O O ,� Q) +. a) a .IU c U c c a�� 7 V T7 c L Id `� C N C U N M U 10 O .7 j -0 .�+ al 7 L1 Q) +� E a) :,Oh C C10 w (� O C a) o + N m CO r0. [ N U N Q c0 ` N F Q) N �7 C tIj .� �+ 3 m � N O a) E. 7 N U 'V iag.N . W a m 0 0 .� 2 a C � Vl a � a) O .0 .. c C U E " a) 0 d C .0 G O C?,, a = O E L c0 'C L N G Q) .+ .0 O N O O h O L O C_ l� ca ro , �7 � w 5.- E E � -op cn ¢ m o � .5 CO o E v `o .� c � � � ro � o m'fl7 [ in � � G C C .� (U -0 O O M - C cp N O 0 .C 7 7 0 0 CL 0a) a) n' O C O C4 c O C tn � E N — E 1—Pg 125 m cs Lo A4.4.i CL J i E o �0 co z IT C J ,� r rt'i i Vi:� .0 .9 � •Q1 v�l�YirF4 Q Q Q 7 iiii. Q Q Q Q O O U •U V U L L L .�aw�.aS+ 3 L L C N U) U) G C C Y4�, ^� C C C C O U U U U U U U U 0) O) `ir 0) m al a7 C a L C: rC H > Q QLO ❑ •nj': ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ cn Si C a+, a) 4,i k! a) Cl 11 U U U � ,Fry U U U U d tm •C A O �: N U O O Q Rx 0 O O O O O O m m �^r�' CL) ro ° ro ° a) N U I9 ro c c c a) U U ffl a) 0 r- E co oc U) �, D Cn fu3 • tx9 w — 10 a) c CD 3 o � a) am � E cR v"i 2 ° � rnN � — oa) =0Ectt- cn '� 0 QL 'oED cpm oQM E � C'1c >, " — ca) a) p I— m .. v a x o N 0 (n � � — .NN a) N a � •'cu o r W romU � rnS ai � a) a6rU E )- ro u ai E � Q.'4' � +-' �fl' Ch .0 E Ln U L, c " U C L U C O _Q Q C U) N to � _• N m — a) 'N .0 m IU „b a) "'' c O '� O �u a) cU' a� E mom ` Vin)},.C7 3a: }' � c0- CD c) cD r O 4L 0 Q) (n L O r r N O a) fU s p :: ro Q) C1 .N w m .� O .C. _ � C v) m E E >. 0 � �? w rn U � to o a) Q N Q) 'y — IC N w H (� ` .:* bCL 0 a) D ` U C L C .D�. a) U .0 U ° E o c � � E _ U c o E U m ° `o o ° E � a) N o '- n a) a) N Q Vi a) D -MO ` rro � U m �- � 0. U a G E C R w ..fir r L o O D U N CEJ 'U O C p).Q Q) C .7 @ N V C_ N O Im N Z O a) U u) D X 1. 7 D N C 'U IQ O D u� .% —_ ro U) .. ❑ , N Co m a. ; of c O i ° p 3 X ] N O N ro E c (n a) D al Q) 'D : c p N -p c 0) (] E -O U tm U D ro o m 7 7 V L N n- O D U C C O "O N O � r-+ C Q) '� .�-, c U CO 7 � Qcv = a tmo, Da) .N ❑ Uouifa) aa)i a � U � C ,° '~ E ro � � � � C ° 3 a) ca) " a) i aEviis cpm o:� cmw Dvasa � � C E U m I�6 n N O C y "O > > 'cn 0. N y + U .` .� U a) C x C m ++ U r C U a o E C - -t- J,.r- N 7 �. C`C ro C O C O fn -O N a) ¢ U U .N 1jdz b O N c ro cn cn .,_. E U C O N D D m O U C iD C fes^ N co a) O a) O C Ifl O D ro + _ D " (j a) m ° � ' � UroroE . .; c ctnEa cm r ° Ec a) [L +a S Q rn LL ca > > c) (D CD U rl� .� .E o tc,� rl) F- m a) Zr � ro m H U a) ro � -0 w cti � U'i[ y E N i c v f?�`' rC14 c) v _ t El—Pg 126 d v ` C p R 4- - CL E 0 0 CC R O fA Z Nt lqr CN [V m i R � C i w d a) R C O 0 U O .- L w of a1 � > ¢ a U O 0 0 C c 0 O U U V •U C V) U1 vl W O +' U U U U ° U •E T 'L •L L. •L F7 ❑ ❑ a p � LO C V r O O Crr c O L (D aU- U U Q U a tmm :Q `o c c o ° ri �° m m m m m o (D c a) a) � v >1-0 ca C o m -00 Sn (UC -0c E o a� o o a) 0c c o - — ❑ 'c R - o o 'a — m •o 0 N a c c°0 n - ca ce CL S`nB w c w aR TE U � � c`�i 03 c) cRi �' a m o 0 V �' U U) ,'� 0 �+ c°i w�CL tm o v u> > oR � = •� crn RSB rncn ° � Sz m N U a) () cB a) U C W L_ ° O) C a C "O a Q7 O) +O a) IB �' -O 2 c C O aXi a) c O R o R o ° ui a� N O 3 , cu •U •, O N D O Q) CD V �.� a) D C 70 7 •` + N R a) C O` TL r'+ "O •^ :-_. •D — •N '~ L) --C C a) a) -- O t X a6 En .°C� o o mR � C0 o)— E m m Q) co� � rn L- ` a N � � � ~ NZ O a -p R LU d d '� - N Q N C as i C p Q) n "CQ rn Y a) B O O_ O 'O O C .- R N 7 3C t 16 O v N c � � R c = -0 a) a) e ` o R C o ` C N .2 O Q^ N X. O ' C O R '� ` N — U L N o vi a) R R vi Q v- � Q3 La � � Se iB cB R Q3E " ` E _ °) N " tea) O C to a) ate) m U E O)'� N r p -°p .Q- -0 -O m iB N iB 0 R +� co U E L) G 7 C R N N U) > � a) W Q O) N a) 7 "' U •al te 'O C C '- R L d3 mC T C R C J (a N -0 .0 O a) C O r 'p a 9 0 0 0 ` R ca' U N .� V () m ° C) � wv -E U0— E � � ❑ m .� o • • • • • • C u .S • uj CO00 M E1—Pg 127 CD O O fA Z .� 11; C �Y. v. p 'G p r:n;'sE I!lo!¢ mg's Un (n o o ' 0 0 3 3 m a) times; ;;'7.a (X "k SsmLO G L) o„ Y cr ri a LLca tm c y In aa)) W ;+ky3 o O EL C O a) m rn 7+'0 ycn O .O 'a '0 Q) a U N G O N ICa a) N N N N O O ti N •O t E 4«- O C fa a) n +. Q) U ,O L C a) O L N rnmu�) � � c � a� GU =3 ca ;#. tin ca y0 > (a ru U '� . LfLa C3a , � Ov ai O aO .� uCi (DO � N (oE �� vcncaoo E 'o x o � v ) ncj mn= �o ) 7, Co Oaao a o O vvf0 -2 QteN a) vC L Q c al C 4 QI ca a cn 7 + L N o o �' po kn c " " � o a o •o m �� nE o .g U nCD LLa _ UD U " OLca N L U — .0 C O U - "O a) m ? (a (n :3 ' nM � O ) ca � oc0a � U - LOJ-- NtM :3 CD m7 �Cwa- O fn "O Q) `^ O) U a) O a U L }:?r a c p ca 7 �4 N ro U C Z �, 3 � a O c ❑ c c L � �? ttr, a) ca a � c p a) m av 3 v aU F lC CC CC a) a U a) Itis E y O jim E Ia. a L r--. (� w-- 'y.r L L _ E a1 O U ai N a 7 j m "D (a N: O +L + c (NO p N a) s O 'd O o w i a = "[3 U L C i m L J-. .--. 7 U O C Q) O U C O w r-ti. (D O a a) L N O .� a) +J c .c C t C d) N w (a V) (a 7 _ Q :� w a) �L p �- C) 7 (aa aE c .� A2 �— m m > c v, 3 p ` a as a E a L v oU] 3 = a 3 ro O a as o o a o) ;� 3 a m d, E U a) mow' w .� CL c 0 �• S ° a) p is a ° r .� p ❑ Q w � 'n a ¢ � 'c a � '� .� c O •U .2' a) Q � n � m O U u �CL cm d) CDCL 7) a") ❑ ._ a) vo ❑ 2 � Eaa) CL E � co- co •oU) CD LU oo) a) ax °) E `� s0� apaca � acc Qct mao E • • • Cr "O a) m a) � LL U Q' �� '0 E (a ca - O i a LL U cn +U; E1--Pg 128 a) c E O U R 0 U) Z N N V 'a 'C a1 a) c� > ❑ C O .0 U O � > ❑ U a � a a. a 09 p O a LO C V � C O O 0 o C r LL Q m W IL tm me C 0 0 Q.2 aN) L- 0 a m cn 0 O ar Q) a) c V w o — (L) +-• E ar df D C w �--� C w C w w t w ar E ° a c c (D w > O E ca ar .. o w cn w � vi co � U `� N m ar I� � � d c T Eco U �-oo °rL~ xu-rte >, 7 cm N O r O N m OL � C .0 4- ^ '� w [}_ to N c� L) m ❑ fU ° U) w e m O w E o -oo ar •-0 3 o (n � a ca W -fn � O E � LO. UO 'N N a) m O E a) VC-1 t N U v U d N U Q1 +J l6 � � Q Q C a) w ..+ m O Q' m Cr 7 d1 C C Q Q' N X � .a C .�. +. l0 C Cf > V7 w a) O ar E C O 'c IO -0 w m f0 .- N W Co M O tm m C 'a '� C (`6 al O F" O) ca O U w �"_' IO M m C Q) L m U O m a) U C d o N O a �. ar E cg c a) c� ur i. ,� m ar U) Z � wO w o m N c a +. N o c a) m ca 'a -0 cip � c o w v c C U U ar LC6 '� r i s a) > U f0 '= m O U i [J m .� 'C O N to a) � O 0 3 ° c , rcn o c c0 air � Q c � � � � Q� o E � a LO m CL w ° V cB ar :' m rn LL l= w : w w w c) L w a) a d N NQ o � � � v N a� � ar o � E ° o E o o f° o -5 CU c � E oar E c Q O p a) O C C m m 0 c0 a E .m 0 a) O E ' w O O Q s� t4 U a) w m O N C "_ O N N °) N Q) �' C c m T03 0)X-- .m C C C a) C .0 V Q ° Q C 3 Q) [o [a c4 C OL m m cU m m R j U Ql a3 C Rr C ui al o m o a o o ary ar Eos w a ;° Td Ua. Qd 2Z UST 3 0 m x am , 0 o m m a EU ar,. � U ❑ c� .rQUU) 0 • • • • s • LL � Q- a- .c -C c� m E a CL E E1-Pg 129 E O D f,= co Z lo > D c O ` p •v U U U U U r :f�ryi C C C C C CL n.. a- IL M w 0 F: O O O O a) . 'a° O a) a) a) F- > i LO Im k r' T CV ` 17. O .�: D O tr ,. ❑ n o o n pp ` U U U U U LL w"a m m m m 'o : t O OrL aNi O O O O O w F m m m m m r, arrnc �, v� a� u� a� ao � a; rno — Co >, � a� �, -oE DoE 0 0 rn L C O a) U Q) Q) !� C m E C C . U C O U }' O _C F;�§`•'� 'Q U - •p j (a ,'�` A C N (a L U N a) `�- O co L 7 O U E U C E U O t•—n N C C �O O O L O OL N C 7 7 Q V N Q. ¢0- 19 Q °' N Q ro E `� mayCL *= � a� �' L o v O L cn E CL a) a `o � U '(n � ';) � C m e a) O.-D is _ `o ai n a) CD � • :: caoo n) cLaycEmono nm D3c :E- mg 07.— � a) � Q � — tn = N � U � N � X � O Qci Qy p �• � u� C p Q o � w -3 E C U (a O � C w + 3 N E O Q) O � � OE Hca N � � O � Oa) o � ° � � ai `ocn — a) a) � �. w OM cro ) o � �ivc UD Lai Ww � L .� 0; O m a) G (a C m - O OL n O) UO) co 6 L 'd L E � X '- � � Q) w0 E � coo "_ N O D U (a CL +' a) .�- C a) C O C O U O tf O a) L O w ,� w (a a3 U + a 0) a) -6 . O cn E N •— O U c w w O i L Q3 v` O �. O .0 v Q) U C L U U O M _O O > w (n _ Q) Car; m -0 E (LU O ti O= �; OL Q C U3 !E " E C N O O (6 O a) O C�i O 7 C - O C1 - (a C1 O O (p Li .6 U — _ (a :« O " a) ?i U Z C O.( C C OL (DL 'C N C O U a C N O 'C E Q) '� O "O 0 -0 -0 j cm C N D a) y p Q) la ro o d S m (n a) — •• +r AO"� C U ++ Q) X U O E (D w C (� U W Q) U N N -r- C C ) O (D y V O (n C1. (a -C a) C C+, O N Q) ' C X Q O L N C Q) N Q) C C b �- Q N t3 U O O O7 w y r+ O .= O cn-0 CL 0 .� U a) y (0 Q O ro t 0 Q) O O al Q O _ :�. C m 7 O L- c Q) CL 7 (n a) 0E c L n1 'a (D O "'• r N = o y �_ ' (�° •C . W L (n ,o w C D U) .5 O m .o ca j) C c) ca a) y a) E o a) L- C C (a � O E U , C Q) X w (� N "D O rn (n = •L N C L U O O a) a) O)x U ..2 L e•D Q) '' (� C U a) O I� O C 'C O O O O Q w, N O 7 O L +' C}L � CL CL O a ,0 m 0 a) E ¢ .C L U L C .•-� O a) C L L - = N L ❑ II) UJ o O d (n E E ,o� E m (a t._ (a U Ci az Q. a) w w 3 ❑ m o D)Q i Lo E1-Pg 130 m U L C Om � .a G E .0 V U � G = fq qr Z j N CN N N IC a+ 'a C a) �F L 4+ a) M 7 n G O O v a a a NEn cc CL wo a O p p `'O 3 3 LO a) 07 O U (j c) U_ IQ m m IIl c� LL O •N O O a� � w m m m orn� ^+' o •otoo ` a) M �, ro aim a) � �, � �- -o ` ma� moa) uiy 0 m � Q ° o ro �� rnm � w. X � mZ v � c a) CL M � �w � u o � ° a) o E -o Z oaoz � U cr os a) E -L m �� 0) 5 o 0 o a� '° U � •a � o m rn ` c � o (ncLnn _ ma) " 7i ` L = M � a) E � a : '� c � � "- o � � rco0 f9 (4 U 0. a) +� o C �,w E a (� O O J .� c .N � Q C c c m E � a) �' � C aV m c .-. m 'x — 0 c a c� ro �' , 2 — G O ,O � � •° � ° wr0� 0 � � aa � r. °� u� � mco � .Ea' ro a) EEn m o is �, E m m u, — L 0 c� co � ° _o �- o f a� E m rnu�'i c a— E E — �zv? orYL `° o � .o 2 ao 5 ;a ° o C o so °' � o)sv ° a) m � o m a � v_, � .2 v, o � C� am ° � NCS E c .N ..-- -a o r=n � �' 0-0 E ''- NEa) c a`) w �' ^- o � �_ —_ ° � � �no os� - E_ 0a� �- o ° E E m C U L 0 0 f� rte+ a) U O E a V U ° O a) = s ^c 0) O rn tm C i C a) - .O. v C O c � � � O o O A r c c ' 2 E cy � U `n E N 'c a) o m CL M ca o Z ° '- L a) O a) QI rz U (nn fl. Q) .n 0 c O a E �' En •n a- E a) U c .O c d a O N .0 c c[3 'O E cu N 0. � =- U) ` C Z •� a) c4 = a .0 Q T�- � �- � U C U N G ° 7 ro L O10 CL O L ,Q w c ro a1 (� 7 n3 O U N '� +, a M a) O 6 `) i a) o G4 :a c = � m .c c of c +� c w a" L U a) O 0 o � � m W " w a) O C O C a) c "' 4- O C N C Q Z O a) U a) L J U : m co O -4" Eo N ' a) Q Q- M O O O � 0, 0 di cnV) (U td U O O C O O co a ca ro W a i rn rn'c E 7, .. t] U in- cu �_ U U 7 O w N O N T N E '-' i7i c = E = m v c 's; UZ ` ' U c .� ct) E 'er v u) a) -o � � � °� ° �' EU ca U r• N O a) Q N a) O O m a) Q) a) CO R (� O N N O 21 C Q) C c t a) > .� a) N Q a) (CO c +r E a U O (D � m :_. ._. .�+ Q_ O_ (o O 2 OL� 7 to a) U O y J OU td U t`a E .N �- aILU Ql lzz CL _ 6 OD E1—Pg 131 m C E �� O O `I 1 U t �x > ❑ or ° o o 0 U U U U e ro Cd N N N N w 0 O O O O O m ° U U U U U 0) �+=• �� C C C C E '� aa) 3 im tF,d LO �'4J O 4 y 7 r eC4 M cr O u`_ ; m U UU U •. ro •` F c c 0 o C � m a) kFS4 0 0 0 ❑ C 's ro 0 0 C C C � 3 N to O C C U C@ O -06 a) .L iri a) 7+-o N a) a) L L o ° cU a o oo moo C a) wL . a� �f7 L... o .: 0 a: c ca E .art — � E � U7o a m E C U � � � o -fl ro c.) •5 ro QCd Q- ro m c' E ,E o � �° c]) CO 0 c ro x }, Q 0 r yy Q N ro N = X- .0 N m U �, L O � Q r p m Q) U CO + f! C C �— .'C.. X p T M C: y -p N N r~-• N N Q) E In cu EO (O c a. 0 N c 0 T - "-'ID � � N � coi ro � cr •E > o `er c �+ � Crot � mai � C O ° � j CL ui G E '2 0 � (C O fn Z s �,. •ct co > ❑ 0 .O f. r u s Q Ui,z PR > Q Q IN f; ftj }:T;w to u) ro F.'l F U U U f3} U is f•,.t 1 C Ig!s Q) �..E :3 j cl LO tm C v -"•'8 r �- ' , LLEts `'1 f!jy f1 rz O-,pki Y' U) `O ��t's�7�Y❑ n❑ ❑ O) O a) C — D VW;F.. »-^ D -O '— N 'O 'O ro ui w "a `- C a) "'' N C to O rn N 'O ' O ro CAA L yCAA G D L a) .� O L a) a) O � O U .�. O tU _ �_ fn —_ L 9 _ �^ N .SC _ f t V "O •:X �C •C cu 'O 1� ° L L E ro � E f!1 ro DLA r U C G `i,:'+X 4:e i'' �N+ .0 '7 (U L U te ' 7 G O O w 0 0 fl w. ro D } ,4 c N . ° 3 In a > > LQ -0 C .D p _ o _G' E (� 0. N 'Jc : uJ w _ ro C N r D � C v C rn 'E 0 a) (U } a) '�' •'-' D N .G .MS sa'.A ro f� lF L a) Q) tU w C w 'ti .n ul U D 4. "D cn M LLJ a1 _ >. C -O C O N L fa �3•'jj SF.'' D N 'O D N S 't'7 .` U ;�, ro o C w N •LULL O A G U 7 .a N ro O D C r 0. y 3 O U C D a) G N a) L fD D a) ° O{Stn" rte+ U a) '� D U ' D V O a) � � `� G ° o . = max E E � o 6 E 2 c �w o E vii c°u v �•�' ro N u7 G C 4) V D U U Q ro ro rn U rn L a Q tL) a ro 0 U) Y Q O N a �:V Olt, G ro D L � a) a) °' N to D C O ~ C L 5; D A tm i 7 C b sC #��J w-. T ° C OL 'i .aT' Q) U a) O •+>> L � C O O Q 0 a) N C C L •.+ — L. (ti D y--. ro EO::.��a:: L C .0 G G ro O, CU W D N 0."O CU •.... ro a) 0. D C m ) N Q ° fv w"a c ° ° c rr . : .:.,v_; O ro x � u� D � � `-' D � ro DZ ma G o � �•= U) �,.. to a) > .�` rn Qa D c A �. a U O G w ° -p _O O L Z ° ro mo aG x a sa° '� c •c 3 QU roLo - m my °1- V �' is c a cU m p,ti-o -- D S o o ro ro c c `° r co o Z c (Di y o , � � miU D o a) : _ ro � � � c +, 7 fU .� °) o o G rn m � ro a' i to 7 'O L L fJ)L L L .Ur, E O .� 7 D C O D A Q) V a O D _ N U A 7, m in C +' L ,1 F' a) D O Q, V N a) {/7 a:1 U v- �-• C U 7 +� s, c U) a) C y N U ro �. a) O � O � a) 't3 aro 7 G ro ro V N • D V ro NQo ° � ° ro r. c�3 ,, C L a) a _ -° o_ C Y a) w X C X E m C 6- L u) l Ic- C a) Q- ro ro D O +�- > E D "O V ro a) O O C O O 0. a) a) C•:i f�_ CO .. a) f U O Q) a7 a) C a) a) N rn C U D C c ° 0 oL ° a `� o D ui °"�' E � ° >, a) c � t�nL ° ro � 0 -0 � N � � � ro o C C a) D C °''p i7•: F,rh 7 O `� L N rL +. ro •� 0. O U =:D rn N 'y p a) o N O Q) D 7 ro 7 C C ;a)w ,4 L U +_ [Q C •� L C en O N L ro ¢ :, 2: L ro N v) O (U 7 p C D O N ro .(n i:e:-:I,.- c ' m ° p — a) ' ° a Q) .a N O, ro N Q•-o Q 2i ro O !Z L O t::Oa'— a) 7i U U UJ .� 7 O O N co O O N L aJ - o � � L = a) 2or- mD ri luM ro towA 0. 0. 0. ro 0. 0 El—Pg 133 L C r E0 Ag a U CL cE C: O O C C o o co Z m m O G U O ,., tl .-• p p O 2 -Le N LY C7 U U v o ❑ 0 0 03: c x o 16 L } N QI V} O d mom'` U N r N M V LCI 0 r-- cis m 0 m 73 1� 4U, @ SsF a a 01 Q a) N••• 0 i ' O a •E U_ al U01 7 Qs .� cuQ U m C. rr; O O o. M LO CM NQS, i r C Q In C) 121 O LO •C G �3'�ti"> p Q) _41 3 1 c N LL J., til p1� 0 O G ° E U r� ❑ c i Ja p ,Li' N ;= m U o o a z 0 [2 5177 v U o a CD L o = E Q) � �' oia �r0+ c o U t.55 � •� L C �. G'd ti H N Q) LU >, c Q) T N Id CO c ro rA � O n � v � Q m f} ❑ W 7 O ? O O [b 0) O OL ED `�- � 5�'' �'�; N .O L to Q Q) to j7 'L !f Fi��` Q7 •L Q) O Q1 C •; �./�� (D Q r 41v?;i;1G O fn U) o CO M 0 �+� 0 o a•'O to C C fn -0 -0 ,� :fl ..s, 0 0 c L 0 W L in ^N i. O GKe, stn � O O tOi � U :=. L m � E c .� 3 , o a) ` 0 .0 C Q) L- 0 O = L >, Q) '!-. ��,, tn G L L yaw f, Q7 C c O m •N fl E d Q ~ z , a s rn •2 ai Q c •L O 'ec=� o �, y � v w a) 0 3 -O L7 cu 0 0 r Q 10, CD O N L � C �,,, w•� (0 CM 4O C Q) •0 N N c L6 7 .+ •i•+ ?� 7 L 'D p c.. fill U tom L QI O Q) V N 0 .y a' a v O m , awl Sc ¢ Cd ' _ E •� rL-• C 'rte"+ C U '� Z •` Ll:� ,..a. q`� U .R ti � r- a) � �co � Qm2EZcOic`� n � -- � a0iT�.0-, � ❑ � O m rn rn oa�r � wmc � � o � U .� E � Lu 0U r 4 E Lb N • O v } v v O r 07 U ca 'g p m L U LO ra a U Co a 11 ❑ ❑ LLooU E a o a L) U n. U m 0- tL E7—Pg 134 >k� bre: rr4Cj.'w� N C) O w 00 CD 0 CD Nr s' I? Nfj t!7 O r 47 CO O d d r M C) I CD (7 I` O C) O O f, ti to M �_ m CD m m W m m CD 0 m aY•: A V..r: ro ro G) C C O O O ;p CS C ro a) Z a 0" U .'ar�v;.• N U ca L) O b b ro cu cj a cu C: fn cE cE ro a) ro m p b L m a) 0 a) U) m wU w W O U_ x U U Unm com Lo ` do Oti} x rrLU Q �,Qjll :r,iOKi• C Q Q N N O + N N N LA d) ++ j O O d N :3I� a) G J J ro Q ro m u� c� °� a� ¢ V o o w �' p Q) a) r Cao CD -- r C 9 LL o -it (1) C') aoa) U aoQ rn4) d a � O O � � �* � cN ccf° Q � a � cm ) � ¢ � NU r- C14 a a vcn vLLL. c"orN� ,V roo m C13 T Za m E E sa5q� U) cc c to cc w L; N y c N E c Q +_• rn• — l.rF O a) p U CO U � b O N C, 7 "'f'�A' '� C G N m O p E Q) O U "yZ"" O p b ❑ C U ~ O U J ` U C LU 7+ c E O to �' (� - a- a) �'v c cn a) c.CL p v p n ro �� ° 3 U }' '�= ro N ro +'".. N •a3 a A '� •7 �• C a1 •��.. n C � d f 1 _ O a) (fl ap p '� O •n 'a O � t C a). Cfl a) a) 12 p.W 07 U � UC'1 cnC7 (A Cf ❑ WQ (nW1— LLl �' � ¢ > ❑ � LLU CLQ EAf !i11 t; .O Q y O G O) f +,, ,s§ L 0 c9 a) o p E b v .. cn E " rn L �F�L 1� 0 0 • O n U E a C C C Q � ' ' � � cab c � Q � O °) ° 3 a) U) a) a) m a) a3 G) co c �, moron c � cn � 7Cln 'rnc O O N a) Op O W a) ro a),a) TE a) (`4 0 0 IC ,kikf. a'� C b co o 3 ca > a a ca U) t. W O b "a O n U) rL CIO ,W:.. CD ya-) O U) •C 5 r'' -� Y Y Oro w :z i ,W PD 4 a) N M c• m 0 0 U M N C _ r r m O r O U') O N LO (.0 t` co M M O M M M M O N t• h O f- 1- ti ti ti CO r— a. Nr r T:. O r Y T T N m m m m m m rn rn m O) m d a+ ♦t9 U U U U U U U U V/ l cm to C) VI 'L C 'C-: N ca C C C C C O "O rn _0 O O O O O O O O co O O co O L E .L E, C .O C L E L E _C E L E C .0 E t1 .E tuco o cu Q m 0 m 0 m 0 ca () m cu c c . cU cO rn + 3 cc) ccs cU cv c C m :3 (a :3 ca mO O m7 a O 'U ° O w 1 r- L) L. � U N N N 'D a O fn O" p fn a^7 7 r 4Lw7 -0 Lo m ap D �S E j L N N U fn m C LL m a F- cO � Low U 4 O a) Lid Q m U z U op y LLJ 7S N N •Q N N � C? �} (n � LL 7 � r C fD C O � O N )(') C O C (D a) a ti C O N iC7 c i73 Lo N �- LI CD a) f• N m m co a) N 7 oo N m N f� p., Ia cD E O i O N O N. L L O r O > f~ 7 M O O r 90 7 co 0 0 r� Uc4 MLUCO N co 'T NU] (o ¢ co ¢ mU) co < m T- m c E o c -o � a o O cN p L Oo c m — E ❑ — o (a a) M:0 U m � ❑ 00 E c ❑ � u oo m rn ca osn UL comm C ; ,� c � r ca o m U ❑ ` cn N c o O o f3 O �, U � . �, 7+ a) 0 IL v L L s c m 4- L N fJ) c D v .v N O) N a) v N L .� tf rn .� N .� L o c :D U) U o m SOM � C% UZ ulo D Q ❑ U ❑ UU m U t ac) aci aci aa)) aci H a) fl) U, c c 0.0r (U O N 7 .Qj tn m a) .N •� a R Q CL CLT N 3 O 7 a a) n 10 ❑ im fA co cA fn U) fn d. 0 N d [. E C 0 mai - c O N p [`a p cli t O ..I U W m C3 (q o.. � h d) E tv N Y N Lo L N t L L L Mn c C C ❑ m E 0 o E Lo z u) o 'a d C) O r r O O Vnr O �f () C) Ocf) r N 'C- . .a. IT Nt C Cr 't' "t d' N co yr '�,' r �' r fr) 0 o0 00 N 00 N N N 00 Oo 00 N 00 00 CL Ln }:. u7 'd' LO 'cr Ct• V LO to LD 'ct Ln tri (3) V (3) 0) (M C) 0) 0) (3) 0) (3) 0) (3) 0) ,TL : Q) .QOM ca N U k LLL,, U U U U U U U U U U U U C C C C C C C C C C C C C Q a) (D a) a) a) a) (D Q) a) (D w a) U E ',., E E E E E E E E E E E E ro „p ro ro to ro ro ro ro cu co co ro ro L L L L L L l.. �._, L L L L L ca y... ca ro ca ca ro ca ca co ro co ro ro a..; U) (f) co U) w to Cl) co w co cn co N 'O� N 'D tLU' N q I LU o o L +L X (�. i' 0 G 00 CO )o)o 0 00 V CD 0 In O N 0 L Q) 'p 0 U7.' U CL' z + CO z 'r m � m n m ti [L m [L m r m 7 Q m (D � N cD fl_ co 00 N Lt) C i LO Fu r L O v- r L N Q N Q N Cf O r Q Nr O to Q) ct• •ch til . tT ct d r C) LA 7 Q m 0) r (n [] o) r CA d my CL � [L 07 � CL m d o) CL N Q .EJJ_. ro E L fn k J E C m 0 U M L lu 0 ro 'L N 0 LU O ,� Q} CL U C `+ �+ .� ro Lo N til N E ` , E v aci m 'c'n o f Q) 0 0 o f ro c V U fn' ; ¢ ol � cN c c c � EN c c c [L v ro ro ' ro 0 1 N o` E 0 ro ro c 2 o o o L C m � w caro cn y o ca N .N � :�, m o L � Q c] L :� ;'-Z•;! M Q) N o fa o C <a [a N ( a) 7 j 7 fa 0 0 Q U LU Z ❑ u.. UU 0 L U UQ ❑ U) OCA of Ou) arfm co CD o 1- ro CL ca o � CL 03 LLa ti CL U) C.) m Lu,_ n el•_ o m 2.v r { o U) ctl o i E ca z LL. (D LO r Y [" C) CDV oQ0 NO W N N N [(7 N co c0 (D y N r C) a) m CD O co co co co 00 00 co co m co Y N N I� a. W W W (n W W d1 m O7 m a1 r m U U U U U U U U U U U U U U O O O O O O O O O O O O r. w+ r-. ++ r-+ ++ .rte w.• r-+ .� �• C C C C G C G C C C O C C () a) a) m a) a) 0 a) v 0 CD w E E U m m m cEa cn ca s� c L L U U U U U L 1-- L L L L— L L C U U U U U C U U (d (a m m m ca (0 (0 (� m a7 () (4 O (n U3 Cn U) f!J fn (!� U) fA (n (n LI_ U1 co N N N CD F, a (n u� rn a) N a� a) E C) m a m a) o ' E 4) � w 0 C) a) p co d N N O � L 0 Z L Cl)c � Or � UJ C � 0 � x0 W � p a3 z � a) XO (D 00 cp OQ LO - z Z r- m - 0] - - CII 7 7 CO 0) m a)co mz -O a o � C) N T"C%j � � O o O o o O o � o " a a ❑ v a d Cl) r r r CA � 0. z- a r �- a r Q r U7 I- LOQ 0. 0 a OW T LL! 10 (�6 XO 0 w a) p `� f4 anir) H E oa o a C .� U N w w w 0 N Q) CLl U) - O cc C 41 N C C C C C L ¢ -Np •O O O C T O N a) U? E ¢ a) � W a) U cam a CEO C (n Ca U E@ o � � E a E E C � L C J ,(n E Z) LD E p a �. Q) p L 'U �, O a) p 0 L) (D U E U a) (D O in a) a) macro mai WW aria ro '� f°o ioc2 COo aa)) � o a) Lu ❑ m ❑ � ❑ cn U m Q ULLla cnU a CL C) ❑ as 00- 00 fU m CLW .� 0 (D a) a) -, ❑ U) 0 N f0 4 Z r` U C N O .�J a •a a� Ct T SC C Z O N EI-Pg 13 � U7 LL � i 2 q Lo % 9 R 2 # N m G w G q G / 0 co G m % � 3 � 3 Nr o a. K m ? G q Co m m d % a / \/ 0 // / v / \ ° $ o § o § o R \ r 5 S� % G $ E E g t 7 c P / o \ 0 42 k § � \ § k 0 ca 2 -i LL O m = a nm -1 mm m k 2 2 « 2 � \ 2 / \ E / (U C14 k � \ / n / � 2yCD k ® fc 33kca Z % c M� / b (a 3 % 22 AGI E / q \ / / 2R \ � -2 N 3@ c3 w « = « m@n « « cogL Sm ± OE = m 003 0cm 0 2 ± ' c E y_ = k co g 2 f 42 $ 2 $ CL o c 3 a k c % c " c / o c ' J ow � 0 _ m Mwm mo E D o c E m E o » E m @ U f 2 LL 0- ® f § ( e g g £ @ »- C » co (n m2 ¥ � ce £ k ( CO 75 = £ 2 40 ID / § £ 5 § Rf o00 § go $ Ao / 4 \ co ki5 Q mon m < O @00 2 « 02 O $ ( 7 k 2 ° \ § % ° " � § CO @ . o . o o . / & o o 0 a a 2 o f o R = -0 m m 2 § � $ k § kf rw � kk § / FE % & & � � � � 03F- 500- 30 ± (Dcc E % - z m _ \ k m IR Z) t / B © « 0� m k / § 2 .m o ,L) / c T 2 N / 2 U f LL. / k k k k r City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Design Review DRC2017-00141 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been pre pared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant, 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 E1—Pg 140 Mitigation Monitoring Program Design Review DRC2017-00141 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures.The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwritten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. E1--Pg 141 RESOLUTION NO.18-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00141, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 39,600 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING AND TWO ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT BUILDINGS TOTALING 9,166 SQUARE FEET ON AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL SITE TOTALING 17.5 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT/HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (MI/HI) DISTRICT SOUTH OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND WEST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0229-111-74 AND 75. A. Recitals. 1. The applicant, J.R. Miller & Associates, filed an application for Design Review DRC2017-00141, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 28, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Pati A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 28, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: b. The application applies to property located within the City; and C. The application applies to approximately 17,5 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located south of Arrow Highway and west of Rochester Avenue and is currently designated Minimum ImpacUHeavy Industrial (M1/HI); and d. The property to the south and west contains industrial warehouse buildings and is located in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI), and the property to the east contains industrial warehouse buildings located in the General Industrial (GI) District, and the property to the north contains the Rancho Cucamonga Adults Sports Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care &Adoption Center located in the General Industrial (GI) District; and e. The proposed onsite improvements consist of a 39,600 square foot industrial manufacturing and warehouse building, and two ancillary equipment buildings totaling 9,166 square feet; and E1--Pg 142 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.18-15 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00141 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 28, 2018 Page 2 f. The proposed buildings will be located over existing pavement areas and will not adversely impact the existing amount of landscaping. The proposed onsite improvements also include a 9,700-square foot expansion of landscaping along the Arrow Highway frontage to provide better screening for the site, which improves the existing overall landscape coverage of the site but is not adequate for the site to meet the meet sitewide landscape coverage requirements of 10% per the Development Code; and g. The proposed project meets or exceeds all Development Code standards, except for landscape coverage. As conditioned, the industrial buildings will meet all applicable Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District Development Code standards for industrial development. i 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The site is located within land designated as Heavy Industrial. The Heavy Industrial designation permits a wide range of industrial activities that include manufacturing, assembling, fabrication, wholesale supply, heavy commercial, green technology, and office uses. The project consists of a 39,600- square foot industrial building, and two ancillary equipment buildings totaling 9,166 square feet. The proposed buildings are intended to complement the existing industrial manufacturing operations onsite and to expand overall manufacturing capacity of the site.All site improvements, including parking and landscaped areas, are designed to be consistent with the manufacturing and warehousing use and are consistent with the Heavy Industrial land use as designated in the General Plan. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The Development Code designates the project site as a Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/Hi) District. The proposed addition of industrial and warehousing facilities for the site are consistent with the land use intent of the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District. The zoning of the adjacent sites to the property are also in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (Ml/HI) District or the similar General Industrial (GI) District and consist mainly of industrial warehouse buildings. The overall design of the new buildings is similar in scale and intensity to neighboring lots. The height of the proposed 39,600 square foot industrial and warehouse building is 73 feet and does not exceed the maximum height allowed for other industrial buildings in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of the entire site at buildout is 0.44 and will be generally consistent with other industrial properties in the area. C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The buildings are designed for industrial manufacturing and warehouse operations. The buildings meet all setbacks, floor area and height requirements. The buildings have been designed to meet the City's architectural standards. The site continues to meet the minimum parking and access requirements. The project will increase the total onsite landscaping by 1,700 square feet to help make up for an existing onsite landscape coverage deficiency. Therefore, the project is in compliance with all the provisions of the Development Code. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or E9—Pg 143 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.18-15 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00141 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 28, 2018 Page 3 improvements in the vicinity. The site is surrounded by industrial facilities of a similar scale and intensity. Furthermore, the proposed buildings are located in the interior of the site and substantially surrounded by existing buildings. Operations on the site are expected to meet all Development Code standards regarding noise and odor. The project site is located within % mile of two potentially sensitive receptors: The Rancho Cucamonga Adults Sports Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care & Adoption Center. However, mitigation measures have been applied to the project to reduce air quality and noise impacts to a less-than-significant threshold. Therefore, the proposed use is not expected to be detrimental to public health, safety, welfare, and/or materially injurious to properties or improvements. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures,there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Staff has not received any comments from the public to date. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic. Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. E1--Pg 144 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.18-15 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00141 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 28, 2018 Page 4 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of March 2018, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E1—Pg 145 Conditions of Approval i j;ni~cCo Community Development Department GuCAIMoONG. Project#: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE m 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Planning ROJECT:Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions: 1. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department. Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building. 2. All ground-mounted equipment proposed, including utility voxes, transformers, and back-flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum .of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on-center. All ground-mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 3. All dock doors shall-be painted to match the main color of the building. 4. All future on-site activities shall adhere to the City's noise standards. Noise levels shall not exceed 85 dBA at the lot line. 5. Future development and redevelopment shall. comply with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act regarding the generation, 'transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste; the management of non-hazardous solid wastes; and underground tanks that store petroleum and other ihazardous substances. As part of this Act, corrective action by the owner or operator of the leaking underground storage tank (LUST) or cleanup of LUSTs by the USEPA .would reduce hazards associated with ground and water contamination by tank leaks, spills, or accidental releases. 6. Future development and redevelopment shall comply with the: California Hazardous Waste .Control Act, which regulates facilities that generate or treat hazardous wastes. Permits for individual facilities allow the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DISC) and/or the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA, in this case the San Bernardino County .Fire Department) to inspect the facilities for compliance and to enforce the provision of the Act. 7. As the designated CUPA, the San Bernardino County Fire Department shall implement the. State and Federal regulations for all future development andredevelopment related to: • Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventories(Business Plans) • California Accidental Release'Prevention Program • Underground Storage Program • Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act Program • Hazardous Waste Generator and On-site Hazardous Waste Treatment Programs • California Uniform Fire Code: Hazardous Material Management Plans and Hazardous Material Inventory Statements. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3113/2018 E 1—Pg 146 Project#: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE- 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 8. Future development and redevelopment shall comply with the California Accidental Release Prevention Program (CaIARP), which prevents the accidental release of regulated toxic and flammable substances. It does so by requiring stationary sources using hazardous materials that exceed a threshold quantity to develop and submit a Risk Management Plan that addresses the potential impacts of accidental hazardous materials releases and that includes measures to reduce hazards through prevention, response, and remediation measures. I Standard Conditions of Approval 9. All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 10. The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 11. The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 12. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 13. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 14. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 15. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not 1h use. 16. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted In SCAQMD Rule 1108. 17. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. Printed;311312018 www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 17 E1—Pg 147 Project#: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE- 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 18. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 19. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 20. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 21. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 22. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 23. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,330.75. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. Printed:311312018 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 17 E1—Pg 148 Project#: DRC2017=00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE- 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design Review-CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING.CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approve_ d use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 25. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading; tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 26. Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 27. Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. 28. Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials' such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly,way including iow-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 29. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of, • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances.. • Landscape and develop site utilizing.shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 30. Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for.landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 31. Reuse and recycle construction and' demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyciables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and abort recycling. 32. All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpool's. 33. All industrial and, commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. Printed:3/13/2018 www•CltyofRC.us Page 4 of 17 E1—Pg 149 Project#: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE- 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning De artmeiit Standard Conditions of Approval 34. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule,to the extent reasonably feasible. 35. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e.,freplaceslhearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. 36. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best ,Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 37. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion, of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil .exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b). An .inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected' through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 38. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and :Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM 10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 39. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or'more to reduce PM 10 emissions. 40. Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 41. Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 42. Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during.off-peak hours, 43. Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load- with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 44. Landscape with. native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 45. Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure.. 46. Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 47: All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). www.CityofRC,us :Printed:3!'1312018 Page 5 0[17 E1—Pg 150 Project#: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE- 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 48. If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 49. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Prinled;311312048 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 17 El—Pg 151 Project#: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE- 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 50. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 51. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 52. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 53. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 54. The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 55. The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on [ow-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the.manufactures' specification. 56. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 57. Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 58. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 59. During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 60. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NO[) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 61. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent• with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Printed:3/13/2018 www;CRyofRC.Us Page 7 of 17 E1—Pg 152 Project#: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE-' 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 62. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at [east two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 63. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Madole & Associates, February 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 64. Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 65. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00,p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday,,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 66. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developers shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level' monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Oficial. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 67. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a:m, on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time- on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips. (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible; the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 68. If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall .cease. and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of-the project. _ filn the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered' during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within, a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, all Native American tribes previously contacted during the Tribal Consultation process will be re=contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. Printedwww.CityofRC.us`.3!93!2018 -Page 8 of 17 1=1—Pg 153 Project#: DRC2017=00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE- 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design-Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 70. If significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2016), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, an SOI-qualified archaeologist .shall 'be retained to develop an cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to San Manuel Band of Mission Indians for review and comment. • All in-field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored by!a representative of a Native American tribe previously contacted during the Tribal Consultation process. • Prior to disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the project, all Native American tribes previously contacted during,the Tribal Consultation process will'be consulted. Engineerina Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Replace damaged sidewalks on both Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2. Development Impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of a building permit, and 'fees are subject to change annually. a Transportation Fee b. Police Impact Fee Standard Conditions of Approval 3. The existing ramps located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If the ramps do not meet current ADA regulations :then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramps for compliance. Modify traffic signal, and equipment as required. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit. The construction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to.occupancy. 4. ,Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided' to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process 'through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued' before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying, for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the - cashier's receipt, showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering;.Environmental Programs. Printed:311312018 www.cityofRc,us Page 9 of 17 E1—Pg 154 Project#: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE- 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 5. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 55 total feet on Arrow Rte. fronting APN: 0229-111-02-0000 Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The press pit is required to be equipped with listed Mist fixed fire suppression system. Disabled access for the site and buildings must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Restroom facilities must be in accordance with the current regulations of the CPC. 2. Arconic is conditioned to comply: "New Electric equipment must be listed by a Nationally Recognize Testing Laboratory (NRTL) per the 2016 CA Electrical Code section 110.3. Unlisted equipment must be inspected tested and listed by a NRTL per the City of Rancho Cucamonga's established policies. The 3rd party approval costs are the responsibility of Arconic. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 2. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 3. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 4. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed:3/13/2018 www.CityofRC.us page 10 of 17 F1--Pg 155 Project#: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE- 022911175-0 000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 5. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. Ail costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 6. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 7. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 8. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 9. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". Printed;3113!2016 www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 17 El—Pg 156 Project#: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 i Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE- 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 13. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 14. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 15. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San ' Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. 16. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 17. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit,. the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 19. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 20. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. Printed:3/1312018 www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 17 E1—Pg 157 Project##: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE- 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the . grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: 1) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (xx Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 23. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the pian view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 24. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location. and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. Printed:311312018 www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 17 F1—Pg 158 Project#: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: .Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTEw- 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design Review CErQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 25. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior .to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily :function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of f ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a- large commercial ,parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking. lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5',000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular(78) repair or maintenance activities{79], such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration ;BMP' treatment shall not be used at sites that ,are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall .not cause a nuisance or ,pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. Printed:3!1312018 WWW.CRyofRC.Us Page 14 of 17 EI—Pg 159 Project 9: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE- 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 26. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant. shall comply with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 5.106.1.1 Local Ordinance — Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 5.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) — Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. 1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Scheduling construction activity. b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes. f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits. j. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management. b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 27. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. Printed:311312018 www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 17 E1--Pg 160 Project#: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility Location: 11711 ARROW RTE- 022911175-0000- Project 22911175-0000Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 29. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading ' Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 30. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be. provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 31. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted,: and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to "the issuance of building permits. 32. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit-. 33. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located.outside of the public right of way. 34. if a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the .site plan and the permitted grading plan set .for non-residential projects ,the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2. 36. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may -legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1') or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept' the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal documentlentity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) :a storm drain system .to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system °without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 38, Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing; Code. Private storm drain 'improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. Printed:3113/2018 www•CityofRC.us Page 16 of 17 E1--Pg 161 Project#: DRC2017-00141 CEQA2017-00009 Project Name: Arconic Forging Facility . Location: 11711 ARROW RTE- 022911175-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval'. 39. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality, of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 40. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include: a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 41. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structuralltreatment devices .and 'best management practices (BMP) as provided for 'in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds. and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 42. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging statianlparking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3. Printed:311312018 - www.C1tyofRC.us Page 77 of 17 El—Pg 162 STAFF REPORT DATE: March 28, 2018 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jim Markman, City Attorney y Jana Cook, Community Improvement Manage SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED REVISI FOR MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00177 — CITY 4 NCHO CUCAMONGA — A request to amend Title 17 (Development Code) of the Municipal Code to amend regulations regarding the posting and display of signs in the public right-of-way. This item is exempt from the requirements of the Calfiornia Evnvironmental Quality Act(CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Sections 15061 (b)(3) and 15305. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 14, 2018) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission review the questions and responses generated following the Planning Commission Meeting of March 14, 2018. Staff also recommends the Planning Commission forward the draft ordinance to the City Council for review approval of the proposed revisions of Chapter 17.72 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding sign regulations for public property. BACKGROUND: The draft ordinance was duly advertised and presented to the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on March 14, 2018. During staffs presentation it was noted that full comments had not been received from the Building Industry Association (BIA) regarding the narrow issue of the BIA directional signs located in the right-of-way. Therefore, staff requested a continuance of the Public Hearing to the March 28, 2018 meeting. As of this writing, a meeting is scheduled for March 28, with the BIA before the scheduled Planning Commission hearing, and a verbal report will be provided to the Commission with respect to any new comments received. Following staffs presentation, the Commission brought forward questions and concerns to be addressed by staff. The noted questions and responses are as follows: 1. What is the driving force for this proposal at this time? a. A 2015 Supreme Court decision involving signs in the right-of-way caused the City to evaluate its existing Municipal Code regulations on signs in the right-of-way. E2—Pg 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PROPOSED REVISIONS FOR CHAPTER 17.72 MARCH 28, 2018 Page 2 b. Staff has received numerous reports from the public on excessive numbers and poorly placed signs in the right-of-way. Councilmembers have also expressed frustration at the placement of signs and the legal inability for staff to provide any enforcement. These numbers have not been well documented as enforcement has been suspended while the City evaluates its existing regullations. c. Several prior attempts to amend the Municipal Code in 2015 and 2016 were unsuccessful for a variety of legal, political and organizational reasons, The City Council strongly desires to complete the process in 2017 and move forward. d,. Efforts to amend the Municipal Code regarding signs in the right-of-way began in May 2017. The process of gaining input from affected staff members inf Public Works, Traffic Engineering, Planning and Community Improvement took several months, as did final legal review with the office of the City Attorney.. e. The proposal is before the Commission now is to have the new regulation in place for the upcoming elections in June and November, when usage of the public right-of-way for signage typically increases. 2. How was the number of permitted commercial signs determined? a. The maximum limit of twelve (12)signs was a suggestion received from the real estate industry. Per City Council direction, staff was designated to meet, discuss and work with the real estate community to help ensure positive acceptance of the final product, Members there indicated twelve signs is a reasonable number to provide directional signs to event locations. They reported frustration with excessive numbers of signs by some in the industry and would like to avoid the visual blight being attributed to the profession. b. The additional constraint of two signs posted in each city block (one on each side of the street)will further limit the perception of"sign pollution" without further firniting the total number of signs. c. The Commission may recommend the draft to the Council with a consideration for further limiting the total number of commercial signs, permitted for concurrent display. For timeliness reasons, staff strongly suggests moving forward, and including any recommendations from the Commission, rather than starting over with a new draft and a new round of outreach, 3. Will there be sufficient staffing to enforce the proposed regulations? a. Community Improvement staff and deputized volunteers already dedicate several hours a week to remove signs attached to City infrastructure or contact sign owners when a hazard is identified. b. As with even the current ordinance, in a worst case scenario there may not be sufficient staff and the efforts of existing staff would not be dedicated completely to gain full compliance from every person or business that posts signs in the right-of-way. The proposed amendment would provide the authority to take action in reported incidents or with the most egregious cases to preserve traffic safety and the beauty of E2—Pg 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PROPOSED REVISIONS FOR CHAPTER 17.72 MARCH 28, 2018 Page 3 City streets. Typically, with focused efforts, the ordinance achieves substantial compliance. c. While full compliance is not expected, staff believes the overriding concern for traffic safety and to address potential enforcement issues with the current ordinance are sufficient to Justify the amendment of this Municipal Code section. CONCLUSION: In consideration of the responses provided, staff respectfully requests the draft ordinance be forwarded to the City Council for final action. FISCAL IMPACT: None. GENERAL PLAN GOALS ADDRESSED: Per Section 17.22.040 of the Development Code, amendments to the code may be approved only when the City Council finds the Development Code amendment is consistent with the General Plan Goals, policies, and implementation programs. General Plan Goal CM-4 calls for the maximum operational efficiency of the street system. By regulating the time, manner and placement of temporary signs in the right-of-way, the safety for drivers, pedestrians and bicyclists is improved in accordance with General Plan Community Mobility Policy CM-4.2. Additionally, General Plan Goal LU-11 is to ensure Community aesthetics are maintained through appropriate regulation. This proposal reduces possible traffic hazards and promotes a high- quality visual environment throughout the City by providing the authority to remove temporary signs in the right-of-way, meeting the objectives of General Plan Land Use Policy 11.1. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A: Planning Commission Staff Report Dated March 14, 201.18 E2—Pg 3 STAFF REPORT DATE: March '14, 2018 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jim Markman, City Attorney Jana Cook, Community Improvement Manage - SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018 0 1177 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — A request to amend Title 1 (Development Code) of the Municipal Code to amend regulations regarding the posting and display of signs in the public right-of-way, This item is exempt from the requirements of the Calfiornia Evnvironmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Sections 15061 (b)(3) and 15305. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed revisions of Chapter 17.72 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding sign regulations for public property. BACKGROUND: The current Sign Regulations for Public Property in the Municipal Code generally prohibit the display of signs on City property by any private party, with certain defined exceptions. Private signs that are allowed in the right-of-way include temporary signs with a noncommercial message when personally attended, the Street Banner Program signs; wayfinding signs when installed subject to program policies and administrative criteria; and up to four real estate signs to direct traffic to the subject location of the sale.. In the last 3-5 years, there have been several i case law decisions that make clear that government regulation of any type of distinction based on content of the sign itself is likely a violation of the 15t Amendment of the United States Constitution. Somewhat paradoxically, the case law does support drawing a distinction between commercial signs and non-commercial signs, but only where the restrictions or requirements on non-commercial signs are less than what would be required for commercial signage. This is a recognition that non-commercial speech, such as religious or political speech, is the most valued and protected form of expression under the 1, Amendment, The City Attorney„working with city staff, has completed extensive research and prepared a draft of proposed revisions to Chapter 17.72 SIGN REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC PROPERTY. The draft revisions retain the right of the City to post signs in the right-of-way (protected under a different line of case law). Personably Attended Signs in the right-of-way remain limited to non- commercial use, similar to the current regulations. EXHIBIT E2—Pg 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PROPOSED REVISIONS FOR CHAPTER 17.72 MARCH 14, 2018 Page 2 The proposed regulations for posted signs would be completely neutral with respect to the content of the sign, other than the legally permitted additional restrictions on commercial signage. Staff members in Planning, Engineering, Public Works and Community Improvement have collaborated to develop these restrictions and requirements which are clear, well defined and narrowly tailored to address the public interest of safety and aesthetics in the community. Staff sought guidance from the City Council at a Council Workshop on January 17, 2018, The Council directed staff to bring the proposed revisions to the Planning Commission for the required review. Staff was also directed to engage in discussions with interested parties to ensure all parties were heard before bringing this before the Planning Commission. The proposed revisions were presented to the West End Real Estate Professionals group at their weekly meeting on February 23, 2018 and to the Inland Valley Associated Realtors on March 7, 2018, The proposal was generally well received with members expressing their understanding of the reason the City has proposed this revision, what would be permitted, what would be restricted, and how it would affect their work. Concerns noted include: 1. Regulation should be more strict with a limit to the number of signs concurrently posted. After further discussion between staff, this has been incorporated with the proposed ordinance providing a limit of twelve (12) signs for concurrent display by any single commercial entity. 2. The number of days for intermittent posting is too limited and should be increased. Staff believes the number of permitted days is sufficient while still reducing visual blight in the City. 3. Signs advertising a specific event must be removed when the event is closed or the date has passed. This was reviewed with legal counsel who determined false or misleading signs are not a form of protected speech and this has also been incorporated in the proposed ordinance revision and applies to all types of signs. ANALYSIS: The use of public spaces for signage has become a significant issue in aesthetics, safety and liability„, at the present time the out-of-date requirements in the current Municipal Code limit enforcement ability. For example, political signs are not permitted in the right-of-way as the Code is written, only signs posted by the City, street banners, wayfinding and only up to four real estate signs are exempt from the general prohibition, This type of regulation based on content (real estate versus political) is clearly contradictory with current case law. Amending the Municipal Code as proposed will allow for the lawful placement of various types of signs because the new regulations would only be based on the time, manner and placement of the sign to meet safety requirements and provide for timely removal. Signs of every type in the right-of-way would be limited for size, height and a display period. As proposed, staff would be able to take action for signs found in violation by notifying the responsible party or removing the sign for later retrieval by the responsible party, In review of the time and manner such temporary signs are posted, staff identified two general types. There are signs that are posted for continuous display for a period of several weeks, such E2—Pg 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PROPOSED REVISIONS FOR CHAPTER 17.72 MARCH 14, 2018 Page 3 as seasonal events, campaign periods and large real estate development,,, and those that are posted intermittently for less than 24-hours, also for seasonal events, directional signs for temporary events and real estate open houses, The proposed ordinance provides two 60-day periods in a calendar year for continuous display and a maximum of 90 days annually for intermittent display. These regulations are sufficiently flexible to allow both types of user ample time periods, yet provide enforceable limitations. Commercial signs, including real estate, would no longer be restricted to four signs for display, but would instead be subject to regulations on the location and manner of placement. Only one sign would be permitted on any street frontage within a city block, allowing for multiple directional signs to be posted, but maintaining the aesthetics of the City streetscape. The overall number of signs for concurrent display by any commercial entity would be limited to twelve, allowing an ample number for providing direction, but limiting the overall number that may be placed, Commercial signs would also not be permitted near the permanent location of a business to maintain the purpose and effectiveness of the sign program for private property. These regulations would not affect temporary signs posted on private property in the City, which would be permitted according to the current Municipal Code requirements. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. The proposed amendment is Categorically Exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Qualiity Act(CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15305- Minor Alterations in Land Use, and Section 15061(b)(3) which is the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and CEQA does not apply where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment, The proposed ordinance does not permit nor allow the construction of any new facilities. It permits the temporary installation of signs within the public right of way with appropriate restrictions on time, manner and place. The signs are regulated to be of size and scale to prevent impacts to traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety while maintaining a high quality visual environment. Therefore, this project will not have a significant effect on the environment. FISCAL IMPACT: None. GENERAL PLAN GOALS ADDRESSED: Per Section 17,22.040 of the Development Code, amendments to the code may be approved only when the City Council finds the Development Code amendment is consistent with the General Plan Goals, policies, and implementation programs. General Plan Goal CM-4 calls for the maximum operational efficiency of the street system. By regulating the time, manner and placement of temporary signs in the right-of-way, the safety for drivers, pedestrians and bicyclists is improved in accordance with General Plan Community Mobility Policy CM-4.2. Additionally, General Plan Goal LU-11 is to ensure Community aesthetics are maintained through appropriate regulation, This proposal reduces possible traffic hazards and promotes a high-quality visual environment throughout the City by providing the authority to remove temporary signs in the right-of-way, meeting the objectives of General Plan Land Use Policy 11.1. E2—Pg 6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PROPOSED REVISIONS FOR CHAPTER 17.72 MARCH 14, 2018 Page 4 EXHIBITS: Draft Resolution for Proposed Revision — DRC2018-00177 RCMC 17.72 E2—Pg 7 RESOLUTION NO, 18-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00177 — AMENDING TITLE 17 (DEVELOPMENT CODE) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND REGULATIONS REGARDING THE POSTING AND DISPLAY OF SIGNS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, A, Recitals. 11, The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared Municipal Code Amendment DRC2018- 00177 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Municipal Code Amendment is referred to as"'the application." 2. On the 14th day of March 2018„ the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. A4 legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined,, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifical1y finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct, 2, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on Match 14, 2018, including written and oral staff reports:, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a, The City recognizes recent case law decisions which identify regulations based on the content of a sign when placed on public property as unconstitutional. Based on these decisions,the City can no longer prohibit the placement of some signs while allowing other entities to post signs in public places. b. The only permitted distinction is between non-commercial signs and those with a commercial purpose. This is a recognition that non-commercial speech, such as religious or political speech, is the most valued and protected form of expression under the First Amendment. This distinction allows regulations to be more restrictive on commercial signs than on non- commercial signs. c. The City desires to amend Title 17 of the Municipal Code in order to regulate the posting and display of signs in the public right-of-way throughout the City, d The proposed regulations are neutral on the content of any sign, regulating only the time, manner and placement of signs in the interest of public safety, community aesthetics and equal access to public places, P10 EXHIBIT A 3 1 s E2—Pg 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-12 MCA DRC2018-00177 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 14, 2018 Page 2 e. Per Section 17.22.040 of the Development Code, amendments to the code may be approved only when the City Council finds the Development Code amendment is consistent with the General Plan Goals, policies, and implementation programs. General Plan Goal CM-4 calls for the maximum operational efficiency of the street system. By regulating the time, manner and placement of temporary signs in the right-of-way, the safety for drivers, pedestrians and bicyclists is improved in accordance with General Plan Community Mobility Policy CM-4.2. f. Additionally, General Plan Goal LU-11 is to ensure Community aesthetics are maintained through appropriate regulation. This proposal reduces possible traffic hazards and promotes a high-quality visual environment throughout the City by providing the authority to remove temporary signs in the right-of-way, meeting the objectives of General Plan Land Use Policy 11.1. g. The intent of this resolution is to continue the long-standing practice of regulating signage to advance the City's interest in traffic safety and community aesthetics. h. The resolution is intended to provide reasonable sign regulations that advance these interests without making reference to, or imposing any regulation based on, the content of temporary signs posted in the right-of-way or the messages that they convey. 3. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. The proposed amendment is Categorically Exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15305 - Minor Alterations in Land Use, and Section 15061(b)(3) which is the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and CEQA does not apply where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed ordinance does not permit nor allow the construction of any new facilities. It permits the temporary installation of signs within the public right of way with appropriate restrictions on time, manner and place. The signs are regulated to be of size and scale to prevent impacts to traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety while maintaining a high quality visual environment. Therefore, this project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 4. Based upon the conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Municipal Code Amendment DRC2018-00177 as indicated in Attachment A incorporated herein by this reference. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E2—Pg 9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-12 MCA DRC201�8-00177 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 14, 2018 Page 3 BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary 1, Candyce Burnett,, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed:, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of March 2018, by the following vote-to-wit.- AYES, COMMISSIONERS:. NOES- COMMISSIONERS-. ABSENT., COMMISSIONERS; ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS;: E2—Pg 10 CHAPTER 17.72. - SIGN REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC PROPERTY Section 17.72.010. - Purpose and proprietary capacity. This chapter regulates signage in the public right-of-way and on other city-owned property. In adopting this section, the city council acts in its proprietary capacity as to city property, as defined in this title, within the city. This section is adopted pursuant to the city's general powers, property rights, Government Code §§ 65850(b), 38774, and 38775; Business and Professions Code § 5200 et seq.; Civil Code § 713; and Penal Code § 556 et seq. Section 17.72.030. - General prohibition. Unless specifically authorized by this chapter,no signs may be displayed an city property by private parties. Section 17.72.040. - Signs allowed on city property. The following signs may be erected and displayed on City property: A. Signs erected by the City or another governmental unit. B. Signs allowable under section 17.72,050 (Personally Attended Signs), 17.72.060 (Street Banner Program), 17.72,070 (Community Directional Wayfincling Signs), 17.72.080 (Posted Signs in the Public Right of Vay) and 17.72.090 (Commercial signs Posted in Public Streets) of this chapter, Section 17.72.050. — Personally Attended Signs. In qualifying alifying as public forums, private persons may display noncommercial message I signs thereon, provided that such sighs conform to all of the following: A. The signs must be personally held by a person or personally attended by one or more persons. "Personally iattencled"'theans that a person is physically present within five feet of the sign at all times. B. The signs may be displayed only during the time period of sunrise to sunset, except on occasions when the city council and/or the planning commission are holding public hearings or meetings; on such occasions, the display period is extended to 30 minutes after such meeting is officially adjourned. C. The maximum aggregate size of all signs held or personally attended by a single person is 12 square feet. For purposes of this rule, apparel and other aspects of personal appearance do not count toward the maximum aggregate sign area. D. The maximum size of any one sign which is held or personally attended by two or more persons is 50 square feet, measured on one display face only. E. The sign must have no more than two display faces and may not be inflatable, air- activated or have mechanical movement. Sign Regulations for Public Property—Proposed Revision March 2018 Attachment A E2—Pg 11 F. In order to serve the city's interests in traffic flow and safety, persons displaying signs under this section may not stand in any vehicular traffic lane or iiin a traffic median when a roadway its open for use by vehicles, and persons displaying signs on public sidewalks must give at least five feet width clearance for pedestrians to pass by. Persons holding signs may not obstruct the extended line of the "clear visibility triangle", as defined in chapter 17.126 (Universal Definitions) and depicted in Figure 17.72.080.D. Section 17.72.060. - Street banner program, The purpose of this program is to establish guidelines and criteria for the selection of city events for marketing through street banners and procedures for the display of street banners. Infurtherance of this program, the city council established program policies and administrative criteria for the operation of the program, selection of designated street banner locations, and applicant procedure and approval process, including terms and conditions, Section 17.72.070. - Community directional wayfinding signs. The intent of this program is to provide assistance to motorists and pedestrians in navigating the ciity and providing access to tourist-oriented destinations, regional attractions, parks, historic and cultural sites, and other public venues within city limits. In furtherance of this program, the city council shall establish program policies and administrative criteria for the operation of the program, selection of destinaWns to identify through the program, and sign location and design criteria. Section 17.72.080. - Posted signs in public streets, In public streets, including public street frontage, private persons may display noncommercial and commercial message signs thereon, provided that such signs conform to all 4. of the follb%iviing: A. Signs shall be freestanding and not affixed to any existing structure, including but not limited to poles, posts, permitted signs, or utility boxes. B. Signs shall not obstruct any existing, permitted, permanent sign. C. Signs shall not exceed nine (9) square feet in total area. The sign's height. shall not exceed 36 inches above the ground. D. Signs shall not create a traffic or pedestrian hazard. In addition, any sign placed in a traffic median, roadway intersection, driveway, or in the extended line of the "clear visibility triiangle", as defined in Chapter 17.126 and depicted in Figure 17.72.080.D., shall be considered hazardous and are prohibited. Sign Regulations for Public Property—Proposed Revision March 2018 E2—Pg 12 FIGURE 17.72.080,D. EXTENDED AREA OF CLEAR VISIBILITY TRIANGLE 4 Lirt w Dge of Ml ra':Wij. V wg�a iaoobk 6 ' N iII 20' .... .. ......... . µL r E. Signs are prohibited on right-of-way immediately adjacent to city property, including but not limited to parks, community centers, city facilities or unimproved parcels. F. No more than one sign containing two display faces is permitted on each side of a public street on each city block. For purposes of this section, a city block shall be the street frontage located between roadway intersections, dead ends, cul-de-sacs, or a turn in the roadway alignment of 45 degrees or more. G. Signs which have become word, faded, weathered; torn or dilapidated in any way shall be repaired or removed immediately by the owner or responsible party. H. Signs posted in the same location-continuously for longer than 24 hours shall be limited to two periods of display per calenclar year, provided that they may be posted for a maximum of 60 days at ,any one time and at least 60 days shall separate the conclusion of the first 60-day term and the beginning of the second 60-day term. Each sign shall be marked with the date the sign was posted. I. Signs posted on a daily basis shall be displayed for no more than 12 hours in each 24 hour period. Such signs shall be displayed for no more than 90 days per calendar year, whether consecutive or intermittent days. J. Signs advertising or promoting a particular event, including commercial and non-profit eventsand elections,`shall be promptly removed no later than forty-eight (48) hours after the event's conclusion or, in the event it is cancelled, its cancellation. Signs that have not been removed within the required period shall be subject to immediate abatement by the City. Section 17.72.090 Commercial signs posted in the public right-of-way. A. Commercial signs shall conform to all provisions on Section 17.72.080 for size, manner and placement. B. A commercial entity with a permanent location and permitted, permanent sign shall not post any temporary commercial signs in the right-of-way within 200 feet of the perimeter of the parcel or structure, including a master-planned, contiguous shopping center, whichever is furthest, where the business is located. Sign Regulations for Public Property—Proposed Revision March 2018 E2—Pg 13 C. No more than twelve (12) signs, each containing no more than two display faces, shall be posted at any one time for each business. In the case of multiple business entities occupying the same premises, each separate business entity shall be permitted up to twelve (12) such signs. In the case of a single business entity occupying multiple locations, the business entity shall be permitted up to twelve (12) signs for each business location, D,. Commercial signs that either falsely advertise a commercial event that is not occurring or advertise any illegat activity are prohibited. Section 17,72,100 Removal of signs from the public right-of-way and city property. X Any sign found in violation of this chapter may be summarily removed by the City as a trespass and a public nuisance, If the sign includes contact information for the sign's, owner, then the city will make reasonable-effort to contact the owner with information on how and where to retrieve collected signs. Signs shall be held by the City for collection by the owner for a period of thirty (30)days, Any signs not collected by the owner after thirty (30), days shall be disposed of by the City. B. The Clity shall not be responsible nor make restitution for any sign posted in violation of this chapter, whether or not the sign is removed by City staff. C. The person or organization responsible for placing a sign in the right-of-way or city property shall assume all liability for damages to the sign or caused by the installation or display of the sign, Sign,Regulations for Public Property-Proposed Revision March 2018 E2-Pg 14