The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2017-05-10 - Agenda Packet - PC-HPCCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAY 1 % 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca Vice Chairman Macias Commissioner Fletcher Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Wimberly B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES DATED APRIL 26, 2017 Page 1 of 8 101 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D. PUBLIC HEARINGS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS - DRC2016-00966 - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request to remove an on -site tree that has been determined to be a Designated Local Landmark related to the site plan and architectural review of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1089-031-36. Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Design Review DRC2016-00814, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E. PUBLIC HEARINGS/ PLANNING COMMISSION E1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00964 — NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA -A request to modify General Plan Figure LU-8 related to the removal of the Historic Resource Designation of an on -site tree related to the site plan and architectural review of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1089-031-36. Related records: Design Review DRC2016- 00814, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016- 00966, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00814 -- NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request for site plan and architectural Page 2 of 8 101 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA review of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low - Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1089-031-36. Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT DRC2017-00156 — NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA — A Density Bonus Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and National Community Renaissance of California, for the purpose of providing a senior housing project in accordance with the Victoria Community Plan and the Development Code, including deviating from certain development standards, for the development of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1089-031- 36. Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Design Review DRC2016-00814, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. E4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE - DRC2017-00032 - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request to permit walls over 8 feet in height due to on -site grades related to the site plan and architectural review of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1089-031-36. Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Design Review DRC2016-00814, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E5. ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT - DRC2016-00965 - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request to remove 1 on -site Page 3 of 8 105 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA tree related to the site plan and architectural review of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1089-031-36. Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Design Review DRC2016- 00814, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156 and Variance DRC2017-00032. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E6. DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2016-00338 — OWENS COURT ESTATES, LLC. — A request to modify Design Review DRC2014-00207 to revise the plotting and architecture for 6 single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved subdivision (Tentative Tract Map 16578) within the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, on Owens Court, located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Avenue - APNs: 0227-842- 01, -02, -03, -04, -05 and -06. Related files: Development Review DRC2014-00207 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. E7. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557 — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS — A request to subdivide one existing parcel of 42,150 square feet into three parcels in conjunction with the development of 3 single-family residential homes located within the Low (L) Residential Zoning District located at 9757 Liberty Street —APN: 0201-251-56. Related Files: Minor Design Review DRC2014-00700. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 15 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15315) exemption, which covers residential subdivisions of four or fewer parcels in urbanized areas. E8. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS — A request to develop 3 single-family residential homes in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map 19557 on a parcel of 42,150 square feet located within the Low Residential (L) District at 9757 Liberty Street — APN: 0201-251-56. Related Records: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 3 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) exemption, which covers new construction of up to 3 single-family residences in urbanized areas. Page 4of8 10, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA E9. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00715 — LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request to modify the development standards within the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan related to the site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit multi -family development on 12.1 acres of land within the Medium High (MH) District (14 - 24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway - APN: 1077-422-97. Related records: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Design Review DRC2016-00713, Variance DRC2017-00215, Minor Exception DRC2016-00716, Minor Exception DRC2017-00159 and Pre -Application DRC2016-00361. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. E10. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20054 — LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request subdivide 12.1 acres of land for condominium purposes related to the site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit multi -family development within the Medium High (MH) District (14 - 24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway - APN: 1077-422-97. Related records: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715, Design Review DRC2016-00713, Variance DRC2017-00215, Minor Exception DRC2016-00716, Minor Exception DRC2017-00159 and Pre -Application DRC2016-00361. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E11. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00713 — LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit multi -family development on 12.1 acres of land within the Medium High (MH) District (14 - 24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway - APN: 1077-422-97. Related records: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Variance DRC2017-00215, Minor Exception DRC2016-00716, Minor Exception DRC2017-00159 and Pre -Application DRC2016-00361. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E12. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2017-00215 — LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request to increase the maximum permitted wall height to over 8 feet for sound Page 5 of 8 101 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA attenuation purposes related to the site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit multi -family development on 12.1 acres of land within the Medium High (MH) District (14 - 24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway - APN: 1077422-97. Related records: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Design Review DRC2016- 00713, Minor Exception DRC2016-00717, Minor Exception DRC2017-00717 and Pre - Application DRC2016-00361. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E13. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00716 — LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request to reduce the required on -site parking related to the site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit multi -family development on 12.1 acres of land within the Medium High (MH) District (14 - 24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway - APN: 1077-422-97_ Related records: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Design Review DRC2016-00713, Variance DRC2017-00215, Minor Exception DRC2017-00159 and Pre -Application DRC2016-00361. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E14. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00159 — LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request to increase the maximum permitted property line wall heights from 6 to 8 feet related to the site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit multi -family development on 12.1 acres of land within the Medium High (MH) District (14 - 24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway - APN: 1077-422-97. Related records: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Design Review DRC2016-00713, Variance DRC2017-00215, Minor Exception DRC2016-00717 and Pre -Application DRC2016- 00361. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration, F. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Page 6of8 MAY 10, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: G. ADJOURNMENT The Commission will adjourn to a workshop held in the Rains Room to discuss Pre -Application Review DRC2017-00216 — Lewis Management Corp. 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 4, 2017, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. ILSI Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477.2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Ustenine devices are available for the hearin¢ impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others. the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. Page 7 of 8 105 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal fled must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,662 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Page 8 of 8 Vicinity Map Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting 1 lase Line oothill' 4 rrow 8th s 0 L A May 10, 2017 E G C a► lu Q to U Chu rch ey 6th I H L € } Y L W lC - Q 2 2 g Base Line hurch F othill Ar w Y j 6th w I E6 4th 4th Meeting Location: E7 & E8 E9-El City Hall/Council Chamber: FD1 & El-E5 10600 Civic Center Drive Items D1& E1-E5: COA, GPA, DR, DBA, VAR, & TRP—National Community Renaissance Item E6: Design Review Mod —Owens Court Estates, LLC. Items E7 & E8: SUBTPM19657 & MDR DRC2014-00700—W & W Land Design Consultants Items E9 -• E14: TVCPA, TTM, DR, VAR, ME, Me—LVD Terra Vista, LLC APRIL 26, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca x Vice Chairman Macias x Commissioner Fletcher x Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Wimberly _x_ Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, City Planner, Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney, Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, Donald Granger, Senior Planner, Albert Espinoza, Asst. City Engineer, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary, Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to approve the regular meeting minutes of April 12, 2017 Page 1 of 7 Cl—Pgl APRIL 26, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA C2. Consideration to approve the workshop minutes of April 12, 2017 Moved by Munol , seconded by Wimberly, carried 5-0 to adopt the Consent Calendar D. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. D1. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19497 — GEORGE BOTROS - A request to subdivide one (1) 42,630 square foot parcel of land into three (3) parcels of land in the Low (L) District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Beryl Street; APN: 0202-241-24. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 which covers minor land divisions. D2. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00798 — GEORGE BOTROS — A request for site plan and architectural review of three (3) single-family residences that will be constructed in conjunction with a proposed subdivision (SUBTPM19497) of a 42,630 square foot parcel of land in the Low (L) District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Beryl Street; APN: 0202-241-24. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 which covers the construction of up to 3 single-family residences. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) Commissioner Fletcher asked for clarification as to the location of the tree noted as a concern. Mr. van der Zwaag said it straddles the property line. He suggested an open section in the wall to accommodate the tree. Chairman Oaxaca asked if the applicant is aware of all project conditions. Page 2 of 7 C1—Pg2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Mr. van der Zwaag confirmed that he is. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing Alan Clark, residing at 9128 Base Line Road, stated he satisfied about the solution for the tree. He said he is also concerned about an encroachment of his property and he has survey drawings that indicate the applicant's property line is 4 feet from his garage and is on his property. Commissioner Fletcher asked who is maintaining the property. Mr Clark indicated that it is mostly maintained by previous owners. Barbara Mc Carter, 7271 Beryl, said that she was told the wall was intentionally built inside the property line. She said she would lose 1foot in back but the property line is 4 feet off the line from a prior survey. She also noted that when it rains, water pools 1 foot deep on her driveway. She said she is concerned her garage would flood if a solid wall is placed where the applicant wants to build it. Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing and asked for staff to address the questions. Mr. van der Zwaag deferred to Troy Tryfonopoulos of Plump Engineering (the project engineer). Mr. Tryfonopoulos said the property has been surveyed and the property line has been established by the title for the property. He said with respect to the drainage; he would propose leaving openings in the wall to allow the water to drain off. Commissioner Fletcher asked how it would drain once the water hits the wall. Mr. Tryfonopoulos said they can transfer the water with pipes and elevate the pads for the homes. Chairman Oaxaca asked him if they reached out to the existing residents. Mr. Tryfonopoulos said they had a neighborhood meeting and both concerns were raised. He said he agreed to provide drainage and we can hire another surveyor to confirm the results. Page 3 of 7 C1-Pg3 APRIL 26, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Fletcher asked with respect to the survey, what is staffs responsibility when there is a dispute. Albert Espinoza, Assistant City Engineer, said our land surveyor reviewed the survey on file with the title and he concurred the survey on the title is correct. He said If there is still a dispute with the neighbors they can hire another surveyor and re -confirm the results. Commissioner Fletcher asked if the old wall will have to be removed. Mr. van der Zwaag said the older wall will be removed and they must eliminate any double wall situations and if there is a dispute, it will be reviewed. Commissioner Munoz said it sounds like there is a path to resolve issues. He said the project looks good and the plotting works. He offered his support. Commissioner Wimberly concurred. He said he also reviewed the project at DRC and it looks appropriate. He said the applicant can work with staff and the neighbors to resolve. Commissioner Fletcher agreed and said that the dispute will be for the existing owners to prove. He said the applicant needs to make sure they don't create a future problem. if something happens to the tree in the future he is not sure the how the liability would be shared. Commissioner Macias offered his support and noted the applicant did all the City required and if there are issues they need to pursue a solution with staff Mr. van der Zwaag noted he was conferring with Mr. Espinoza and they determined that even if the wall moved 5 feet to the south and the other is moved there is still plenty of room to meet all the required setbacks. Chairman Oaxaca said asked the residents to connect with staff with their documentation to clarify the property lines. He said it is not uncommon to have differing lines and it can be resolved. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher, carried 5-0 to adopt the Resolutions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19497 and Minor Design Review DRC2013-00798 as presented. D3. TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00249 - PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved 8-lot Tentative Tract Map Page 4 of 7 C1-Pg4 APRIL 26, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (SUBTT16605) residential subdivision for condominium purposes on 21 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Pacific Electric Trail, APNs: 0207-101-13, 31, 34 & 41. Related Files: Time Extension DRC2015-01110. On April 12, 2006, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract 16605. Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Richard Davidson (residing in the Red Hill area) asked if any major changes have been made to the proposal in recent months. He also noted that there is heavy traffic already coming out of the Red Hill development. Chairman Oaxaca said an application has not come to the Commission yet but he could check with planning staff. Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing. Mr. Grahn noted the project area has expanded and includes the old Red Chief Motel site. He said the modified plan now indicates the development will have access to the west of the Sycamore Inn and it is the same applicant and because the proposal has expanded it will be brought back to the Commission and there will be another opportunity for the public to speak on the proposal again in the future. He said there also would be more neighborhood meetings and will also have to go to the City Council for final approval. He said there are currently 3 more possible extensions available. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, carried 5-0 to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2017-00249 as presented. F. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: Page 5 of 7 Cl-Pg5 APRIL 26, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Munoz updated the Commission regarding the transportation bill that passed and also thanked City Management for providing opportunities for our staff to have valuable face time with the legislators. He noted there are about 2500 bills each year. He said one hot issue is affordable housing and how difficult that has become to address because of the loss of redevelopment funds and other factors. He said they are looking for ways to streamline affordable housing projects and for alternative ways to expand the tax base He noted Senator Mike Morrel and Assemblyman Marc Steinorth both had issues with raising taxes. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mike Smith, Senior Planner updated the Commission regarding the project site of the Animal Hospital presented at the last meeting and the piled trash at the house of 7271 Amethyst Avenue. He reported the site has been cleaned up and provided a picture evidencing that fact. G. ADJOURNMENT I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 20, 2017 seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. 7.45 PM /LS/ Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply Page 6 of 7 C1—Pg6 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,662 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Page 7 of 7 C1-Pg7 DATE: May 10, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner l / INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DRC2016-00966 - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request to remove an on -site tree that has been determined to be a Designated Local Landmark rel ted to the site plan and architectural review of a 140-unit, affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 - 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard. APN: 1089-031- 36. Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Design Review DRC2016-00814, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission take the following actions: • Recommend the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. • Approve Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966. BACKGROUND: The related General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Design Review DRC2016-00814, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit will be reviewed by the Planning Commission on the same meeting date. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 35 dwelling units per acre. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq: North - Pacific Electric Trail & Single -Family Residences; Low (LM) District (8 - 14 dwelling units per acre), Victoria Community Plan South - Approved Commercial Center; Village Commercial (VC) District, Victoria Community Plan East - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) District (8 - 14 dwelling units per acre), Victoria Community Plan D1-Pg1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DRC2016-00966 COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 2 West - San Bernardino County Flood Control District Maintenance Yard; Low Medium (LM) District (8 —14 dwelling units per acre) & Flood Control/Utility Corridor C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Medium (LM) North - Low Medium (LM) South - Neighborhood Commercial (NC) East - Low Medium (LM) West - Low Medium (LM) & Utility Corridor (UC) D. Site Characteristics: The project site is generally rectangular in shape and is approximately 340 feet from east to west and 600 feet from north to south. The site drains roughly from north to south, with a grade change of approximately 10 feet from the north to south property lines. The site is highly disturbed with a total vegetation co�ver of approximately 60 percent. There is a large specimen Canyon Live Oak tree located at the southeast corner of the site. ANALYSIS: A. General: The related projects are for the development of a 140-unit, affordable senior rental housing project on 4 acres of land at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard. A large specimen Canyon Live Oak tree located at the southeast corner of the project site was given a Historic Landmark Designation by the Historic Preservation Commission on October 21, 1987. The health of this tree has since declined to a point where the applicant's arborist and the City's on -staff arborist have concluded that the tree cannot be preserved. Removal of the tree requires approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2016-00966) by the Historic Preservation Commission, a General Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00964) to modify General Plan Figure LU-8 to remove the tree from a map illustrating the location of all the historic resources in the City and a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2016-00965). Staff supports the removal of the tree due to the tree's declining condition. The applicant will plant a 72-inch box size Canyon Live Oak tree to replace the existing tree. B. Certificate of Appropriateness: In 1987 the Historic Preservation Commission recommended the Canyon Live Oak tree be designated as a Historic Landmark. The original application for designation was requested by Rober L. Hickcox, a local resident and noted expert on the history of Etiwanda. At the time of the request, the native oak was 13 feet, 10 inches in circumference at a point of 3 feet above the ground with a spread of 66 feet. This was comparable in size to the large Sycamore in front of the Sycamore Inn and also to the Majestic Oak found in the Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden in Claremont. The experts at the time estimated its age at over 100 years. They surmised that because this variety was typically found growing along the edges of the foothills, the seed may have washed from the foothill area to this location during winter rains. The recommendation for designation was approved based upon the age, size and community/cultural significance of the tree. Development Code Section 17.16.080 (Tree Removal Permit) requires that removal of a tree that was previously designated as a Historic Landmark shall include the approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Historic Preservation Commission. The Certificate of Appropriateness will remove the Historic Landmark designation from the subject Canyon D1—Pg2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DRC2016-00966 COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 3 Live Oak tree due to the declining health of the subject tree. A condition of approval has been added requiring the developer to install a plaque commemorating the historic tree. C. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and waste materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, planning and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed related development under review by the Planning Commission will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Photo of Subject Tree Draft Resolution of Approval for Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966 CB:TV/Is D1—Pg3 go 17 '0 i Y- I -.. -. 41. f ins RESOLUTION NO. 17-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DRC2016-00966, A REQUEST TO REMOVE AN ON -SITE TREE THAT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE A DESIGNATED LOCAL LANDMARK RELATED TO THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 140-UNIT AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ON 4 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE LOW -MEDIUM (LM) DISTRICT (4 — 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF FIREHOUSE COURT AND WEST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1089-031-36. A. Recitals. 1. National Community Renaissance of California filed an application for the approval of Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Certificate of Appropriateness request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of May 2017, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the terminus of Fire House Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard in the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and b. To the west of the project site is a maintenance yard operated by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District within the Low Medium (LM) District and Flood Control/Utility Corridor (FC/UC) District of the Victoria Community Plan; to the east is Day Creek Fire Station #173, within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan ; to the north is the Pacific Electric trail and single-family residences within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and, to the south is land that is under construction with a new commercial center (Day Creek Village) within the Village Commercial (VC) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and D1—Pg5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-01 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DRC2016-00966 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA. MAY 10, 2017 Page 2 C. The applicant is requesting to develop a 140-unit affordable rental senior housing project on 4 acres of land; and d. A large specimen Canyon Live Oak tree is located at the southeast corner of the site that was given a Historic Landmark Designation by the Historic Preservation Commission on October 21, 1987. The health of this tree has since declined to a point where the applicant's arborist and the City's on -staff arborist have concluded that the tree cannot be preserved. Removal of the tree requires approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2016-00966) by the Historic Preservation Commission, a General Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00964) to modify General Plan Figure LU-8 to remove the tree from a map illustrating the location of all the historic resources in the City and a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2016-00965); and e. Development Code Section 17.16.080 (Tree Removal Permit) requires that removal of a tree that was previously designated as a Historic Landmark shall include the approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Historic Preservation Commission. The Certificate of Appropriateness will remove the Historic Landmark designation from the subject Canyon Live Oak tree due to the declining health of the subject tree. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Historic Resource within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act. The subject Historic Resource, a Canyon Live Oak tree, cannot be preserved due to the declining condition of the tree and has been recommend for removal by the applicant's and City's arborists. b. The project is consistent with the purposes of this Chapter. Section 17.18.080 provides for the removal of historic resources where it has been determined that removal is necessary to correct an unsafe or dangerous condition. In this case historic resource, a Canyon Live Oak tree, is in declining health and removal is necessary to correct an unsafe condition. C. The project is consistent with the Secretary's Standards. The project is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards as they are directed to the preservation of historic property. The subject Historic Resource is a Canyon Live Oak tree and would not be covered by the Secretary of the Interior Standards. d. All efforts to restore, rehabilitate, or relocate the resource have been exhausted. The applicant's arborist and the City's on -staff arborist have concluded that the tree cannot be preserved and is recommended for removal and replacement with a large specimen tree of the same species. e. Restoration or rehabilitation would require extensive alterations thatwould render the resource unworthy of preservation. The subject Canyon Live Oak tree is in declining health and cannot be preserved. f. Failure to demolish the resource would adversely affect or detract from the character of the neighborhood. The subject Canyon Live Oak tree is in declining health and cannot D1—Pg6 HISTORICI PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-01 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DRC2016-00966 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA. MAY 10, 2017 Page 3 be preserved. The applicant will plant a large specimen tree of the same species near the location of the existing tree. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Historic Preservation Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the projectwill have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that d9termination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (1) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Historic Preservation Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Historic Preservation Commission. Based on these findings, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Historic Preservation Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Historic Preservation Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records forthe Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Historic Preservation Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the Certificate of Appropriateness application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. 1) Approval is for Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966 to remove the Historic Designation for a Canyon Live Oak Tree that has been determined to be in declining health and cannot be preserved — APN: 1089-031-36. D1—Pg7 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-01 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DRC2016-00966 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA. MAY 10, 2017 Page 4 2) Approval for Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966 is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Design Review DRC2016-00814 and City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964 and Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156. 3) Approved is contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any otherlCity Ordinances. 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6) The Developer shall install a commemorative plaque in recognition of the historic Canyon Live Oak tree slated for removal. The material, design and location of the plaque shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3'fl ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, d•.: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-01 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DRC2016-00966 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA. MAY 10, 2017 Page 5 passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: D1—Pg9 Conditions of Approval RANCH (;ucAntoNcn Community Development Department Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032. DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Exterior: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) During all project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with property operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers" standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptor nearest the project site. 3) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. Interior: 4) All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well fitted, well weather-stripped assemblies and shall have a minimum sound transmission class (STC) rating of 27. 5) All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least one and three -fourths inch thick. 6) At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtight seal. 7) Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well fitted or caulked plywood of at least one inch thick. Ceilings shall be well fitted, fully sealed gypsum board of a least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. 8) Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use and sill receive circulated air. A forced air circulation system (e.g. air conditioning) or active ventilation system shall be proved which satisfies the requirement of the Uniform Building Code. 9) Prior to approval of building permits, a letter from an acoustic engineer shall be submitted verifying conformance to the interior noise mitigation measures. 10) Prior to final approval by the Planning Department, an acoustic engineer shall be submitted verifying implementation of the interior mitigation measures. 2. A 70-inch box size Canyon live oak shall be planted on the project site to the west of the existing Canyon live oak tree to be removed. Pdnted: 4/19/2017 w .CityofRC.us D1-Pg10 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC201 DRC�017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. A Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation certified Native American Monitor shall be onsite during any and all ground disturbances. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 5. The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered Iat least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 6. The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 7. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 8. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 9. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 10. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 11. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 12. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume; low-pressure spray. Printed: 4/19/2017 www.CltyofRC.us page 2 of 19 D1-Pg11 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24 inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 14. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 15. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only. to all parties involved in the construction/grading . activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 16. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 17. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 18. During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Printed: 4/19/2017 1,wnv.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 19 D1—Pg12 Project#: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description, and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 21. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing . the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 22. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Madole & Associates, February 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 23. Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 24. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 25. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66; 050, as measured at the property line. Developers. shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 26. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CltyofRC.us Page 4 of 19 D1—Pg13 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 27. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 28. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's R} le 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. 29.If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities', to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating, the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CityofRc.uS Page 5 of 19 D1—Pg14 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30.If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 31. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 32. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 33. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 34. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 35. The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 36. The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 37. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 38. Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CltyofRC.us Page 6 of 19 D1—Pg15 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 39. Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 7 of 19 D1—Pg16 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 40. Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre- construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre - construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non- migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre - construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determinedby a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 41. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. Printed. 4/19/2017 www.CityofRC.uS Page 6 of 19 D1—Pg17 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: Project Type: -108903136-0000 Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 42. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 43. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 44. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 45. Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 46. Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. 47. Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 48. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; Increased insulation. Limit air leakage through the structure. Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 49. Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Install water efficient landscapes.: and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 50. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 9 of 19 D1—Pg18 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 51. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 52. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 53. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 54. Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 55. Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 56. Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 57.Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 58. Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 59. Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 60. Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 10 of 19 D1—Pg19 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Firehouse Court frontage improvements: a. Remove existing cobblestones on the parkway and install street trees per City Standards. b. The drive approach shall have a minimum width of 35 feet, per City Standard 101, Type C. c. Protect or replace existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping as required. d. The street light on Firehouse Court shall be relocated due to the location of the curb return of the commercial drive approach. e. If an entry gate is proposed, it shall be in accordance with the City `'Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard. 2. Development Impact Fees are assessed at the time of building permit issuance. 3. The proposed development is slated to be included in the City's Fiber Optic / Broadband service business plan that would provide a City owned Fiber -to -the -Home (FTTH) infrastructure. Proposed fiber optics on -site (conduits and fiber) will be placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed by the Master Developer. The fiber and conduits along the backbone streets shall be installed in a joint trench by the developer as the last lane improvements are completed. In -tract fiber and conduit shall be installed by the developers in joint trench where possible. Maintenance of the installed system will be the responsibility of the City. Development of the Project requires the installation by the developers of all fiber optic infrastructure necessary to service the Project as a stand-alone development. In addition, developer shall coordinate with RCMU which may provide for high-speed internet services. 4. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. 5. Obtain approval from Sanbag regarding the proposed access to the Pacific Electric Trail, prior to issuance of building permit. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering ,Services Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Printed: 4/19/2017 www,CityofRC.us Page 11 of 9 D1—Pg20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING - 108903136-0000 Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval Reciprocal Access Agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adjacent property for use by the Fire District to gain .access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no •obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. The Fire Construction Services Unit shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as required by the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. Printed: 4/19/2017 www.CityofRC.us D1—Pg21 Page 12 of 19 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 12. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 13. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum project boundary. 14. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 15. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown drainage plan. of 100-feet beyond construction where the latest adopted on the grading and Printed: 4/19/2017 www.CllyofRC.us Page 13 of 19 D1—Pg22 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 17. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 18. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 21. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 22. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 23. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 4/19/2017 www.CltyofRC.us Page 14 of 19 D1—Pg23 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS 11 SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 24. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and, pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CilyofRC.us Page 15 of 19 D1—Pg24 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 25. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs ,utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. I. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items, b., c., and d. above. Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CilyofRC.us Page 16 of 19 D1—Pg25 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 26. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 27. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 28. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 29. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 30. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 31. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of Code. 33. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration Environmental Program Manager. The land owner management practices (BMP"s) as described in 1 (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All cos chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. show that all manufactured slopes shall permitted line, or the adjacent private the current adopted California Building a qualified person/company on a biennial basis chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall maintain on a regular basis all best he Storm Water Quality Management Plan :s associated with the underground infiltration 34. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 17 0! 19 D1—Pg26 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permittedgrading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 37. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 38. The subject project, shall accept all existing off -site storm water drainage flows and safely convey thoseflows through or around the project site. If existing off -site storm water drainage flows mix with any on -site storm water drainage flows, then the off -site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on -site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 39. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; III) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Printed: 4/19/2017 www.CityofRC.uS Page 18 of 19 D1—Pg27 Project #: Project Name: Location: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING -108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 40. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 41. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 42. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 43. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 45. DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of the storm water retention. Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CityofRC.us D1—Pg28 Page 19 of 19 s! AE I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REPORTSTAFF DATE: May 10, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Plannee INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00964 - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request to modify General Plan Figure LU-8 related to the removal of the Historic Resource Designation of an on -site tree related to the site plan and architectural review of a 140 unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 - 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1089- 031-36. Related files: Design Review DRC2016-00814, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT DRC2017-00156 - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request for a Density Bonus Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and National Community Renaissance of California, for the purpose of providing a senior housing project in accordance with the Victoria Community Plan and the Development Code, including deviating from certain development standards, for the development of a 140 unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 - 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1089- 031-36. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Design Review DRC2016-00814, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00814 - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA-A request for site plan and architectural review of a 140 unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 - 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1089- 031-36. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017- 00156, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. E1-E5Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2016-00964, DR DRC2016-00814, DBA DRC2017-00156, VARIANCE DRC2017-00032 & TRPDRC2016-00965 COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 2 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE - DRC2017-00032 - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request to permit walls over 8 feet in height due to on -site grades related to the site plan and architectural review of a 140 unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1089-031-36, Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Design Review DRC2016-00814, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT - DRC2016- 00965 - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request to remove 1 on -site tree related to the site plan and architectural review of a 140 unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1089-031-36. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Design Review DRC2016-00814, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156 and Variance DRC2017-00032. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: • Recommend the City Council adopt the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Recommend the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964 and Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156. • Approve Design Review DRC2016-00814, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 35 dwelling units per acre. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Pacific Electric Trail & Single -Family Residences; Low (LM) District (8 — 14 dwelling units per acre), Victoria Community Plan E1—E5 Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2016-00964, DR DRC2016-00814, DBA DRC2017-00156, VARIANCE DRC2017-00032 & TRPDRC2016-00965 COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 3 South - Approved Commercial Center; Village Commercial (VC) District, Victoria Community Plan East - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) District (8 — 14 dwelling units per acre), Victoria Community plan West - San Bernardino County Flood Control District Maintenance Yard; Low Medium (LM) District (8 —14 dwelling units per acre) & Flood Control/Utility Corridor C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Medium (LM) North - Low Medium (LM) South - Neighborhood Commercial (NC) East - Low Medium (LM) West - Low Medium (LM) & Utility Corridor (UC) D. Site Characteristics: The project site is generally rectangular in shape and is approximately 340 feet from east to west and 600 feet from north to south. The site drains roughly from north to south, with a grade change of approximately 10 feet from the north to south property lines. The site is highly disturbed with a total vegetation cover of approximately 60 percent. There is a large specimen Canyon Live Oak tree located at the southeast corner of the site. ANALYSIS: A. Background: In September 2014, the Housing Successor Agency (HAS) entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with a developer for the 14 acre site located at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard. The land transaction provided for the sale of the 14 acre site with the intent that 10 acres would be developed as a neighborhood commercial shopping center currently under construction and 4 acres would be used to develop affordable senior housing. The property includes a recorded covenant that requires it to be built for affordable senior housing purposes. The City, in its capacity as the HAS, desires to convey the property to Community Renaissance of California (Day Creek Senior Housing Partners, LP) for development of a 140-unit, affordable senior housing. The proposed project will consist of 139 affordable senior housing units plus one manager unit. B. General: The applicant is requesting to develop a 140-unit, affordable senior rental housing project on 4 acres of land at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard. To the west of the project site is a maintenance yard operated by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District; to the east is Day Creek Fire Station #173; to the north is the Pacific Electric trail; and, to the south is land that is under construction with a new commercial center (Day Creek Village). The project will take vehicle and pedestrian access from Firehouse Court, with a secondary gated Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) provided to the future commercial center to the south. The project will also provide a gated pedestrian connection to the Pacific Electric Trail and a pedestrian connection from Firehouse Court to the new commercial center under construction to the south. C. Zoning: The land use and zoning designation of the project site is Low -Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan, which permits 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The Victoria Community Plan includes a provision permitting the zoning designation to be increased by up to 2 density ranges in order to provide plan flexibility. The project site can thus be E1—E5 Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2016-00964, DR DRC2016-00814, DBA DRC2017-00156, VARIANCE DRC2017-00032 & TRPDRC2016-00965 COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 4 increased in density from Low -Medium (LM) District to either Medium (M) District (8 — 14 dwelling units per acre) or Medium -High (MH) District (14 — 24 dwelling units per acre). The Victoria Community Plan also provides an incentive to build affordable housing, which awards property owners' one bonus unit in density for every affordable dwelling unit provided. The project will be 100 percent affordable and is thus eligible for a 100 percent increase in the permitted density level, or between 24 to 48 dwelling units per acre. The proposed density is 35 dwelling units per acre. D. Affordability. Concessions and Density Bonus Agreement: Development Code Chapter 17.46 (Density Bonuses, Incentives and Concessions) provides incentives for the production of affordable housing, including the opportunity to provide reductions in the related development standards. The applicant can request up to 3 concessions based on the affordability factor of the project. In this case, the applicant is requesting 2 concessions, a reduction in the required number of parking spaces and a reduction in the size of the private recreation areas (decks). Density bonuses and concessions are considered in conjunction with any necessary development entitlements for the project and approved by a Density Bonus Agreement. The designated approving authority for the Density Bonus Agreement is the City Council. The required Regulatory Agreement and Tax Credit restrictions for the project will require affordability covenants for a term of 55-years on 139 of the 140 one and two bedroom units. The affordability restrictions for the 139 units are as follows: 15 units will be available to eligible senior households whose income does not exceed 30% of the area median income; 49 units will be available for those whose income does not exceed 45% of the area median income; 43 units available to those whose income does not exceed 50% of area median income; and 32 units available for those whose income does not exceed 60% of area median income. Below is a summary of the unit breakdown by income restriction and the estimated affordable rent, exclusive of a utility allowance. As a comparison, current market rents in Rancho Cucamonga average $1,350 for a one -bedroom unit and $1,700 for a two - bedroom unit. Senior Hous•ir�g Affor abili u ary , /obfrArea of Medta 1 Number f Unifs ,Maxi n`um"eli ible iaiu a IGmurm" an r thlye A 30Percent� 15 $15;600 $350'' 45 Percent 49 , $23;400 $539 50 Percent 43 $26,000 $599 60 Percent 32 $31-,200 - $71,9 Rents are uaseu or, One uemdbur mws. uwuurc esumares are based on two -person nuuseiwiu size and utilizing 2015 income limits The managing general partner for the project is National Community Renaissance (National CORE), one of the nation's largest non-profit affordable housing developers and has a proven track record of managing quality affordable housing developments in Rancho Cucamonga. National CORE owns and operates 8 sites totaling 833 housing units. The proposed project will also include related facilities, such as access to the Pacific Electric Trail, and a community center to benefit and support the residential development. In addition E1—E5 Pg4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2016-00964, DR DRC2016-00814, DBA DRC2017-00156, VARIANCE DRC2017-00032 & TRPDRC2016-00965 COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 5 to providing low income, affordable senior housing, the construction of this project will provide additional jobs, encourage new investment, and improve the economic and physical conditions in the city. E. Canvon Live Oak Tree and Tree Removal Permit: The large specimen Canyon Live Oak tree located at the southeast corner of the site was given a Historic Landmark Designation by the Historic Preservation Commission on October 21, 1987. The health of this tree has since declined to a point where the applicant's arborist and the City's on -staff arborist have concluded that the tree cannot be preserved. Removal of the tree requires approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2016-00966) by the Historic Preservation Commission, a General Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00964) to modify General Plan Figure LU-8 to remove the tree from a map illustrating the location of all the historic resources in the City and a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2016-00965). Staff supports the removal of the tree due to the tree's declining condition. The applicant will plant a 72-inch box size canyon live oak tree to replace the existing tree. General Plan Amendment: General Plan Figure LU-8 (Historic Resources) (Exhibit J) illustrates the location of the Designated Historic Sites in the City including the Canyon Live Oak Tree on the project site. General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964 will amend General Plan Figure LU-8 to remove the subject tree from this figure. G. Certificate of Appropriateness: Development Code Section 17.16.080 (Tree Removal Permit) requires that removal of a tree that was previously designated as a Historic Landmark shall include the approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Historic Preservation Commission. The Certificate of Appropriateness will remove the Historic Landmark designation from the subject Canyon Live Oak tree due to the declining health of the subject tree. A condition of approval has been added requiring the developer to install a plaque commemorating the historic tree. H. Design: The proposed development has a Craftsman architectural design theme that includes the use of board and batten siding, stone veneer, wood framed awnings and trellis structures, flat tile roofs and exposed rafter tails. These design elements are carried to each elevation, including the inner courtyard and a small 595 square foot detached maintenance building. The project includes both wall and roof plane articulation along with a wood framed porte-cochere at the main entrance. All of the proposed 140 rental units will be in a single building on 3 floors and are built around a central courtyard. This includes 131 one bedroom units that range in size from 617 to 701 square feet and 9 two bedroom units that are 894 square feet in size. The development includes one unit that will be occupied by the on -site manager. The central courtyard includes a pool and spa, BBQ facilities, a fire pit, along with multiple fire places and lounge areas. A community room, warming area, multi -purpose room and technology areas are provided within the building. Shared laundry facilities are provided on each floor. Development Criteria: The project complies with all development criteria of the Victoria Community Plan and the Development Code, except for the 2 concessions for a reduction in the parking and private open space requirements and a request for a wall height Variance. The minimum side and rear setbacks provided for the carports is 6 feet (5 feet required) and E1—E5 Pg5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2016-00964, DR DRC2016-00814, DBA DRC2017-00156, VARIANCE DRC2017-00032 & TRPDRC2016-00965 COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 6 the front setback is 96 feet (15 feet required). The building height is 39 feet-4 inches, which is below the permitted 40 feet. Total private and common open space is 40 percent (35 percent required) and the total lot coverage is 24 percent (50 percent maximum). Each unit includes a private deck ranging in size from 81 square feet (upper floor) and 107 square feet (ground floor). The required upper floor deck size is 100 square feet and the required ground floor deck size is 100 square feet. Each deck also includes a 130 cubic foot storage area, greater than the required 125 cubic foot storage area. The applicant is requesting a concession for the deck size deficiency. The project complies with the landscape requirements including the parking lot landscaping and the tree planting requirement (200 trees). The perimeter of the project site includes columnar trees to screen the view of the adjacent maintenance yard. The replacement Canyon Live Oak tree (72-inch box) will be located directly south of the main entrance, creating a focal point and will include a seat wall and the plaque commemorating the historic Canyon Live Oak tree. Parking: The project provides 119 parking stalls, 82 of which are in carport stalls and 37 in uncovered stalls. Projects that provide affordable housing units are required to provide 1 parking space for 1 bedroom units and 2 parking spaces for 2 bedroom units, which is inclusive of guest parking. This translates into a parking requirement of 149 parking spaces. The proposed 119 parking spaces is 30 parking spaces below the minimum requirement (a 20 percent reduction). Projects with affordable units may request a parking reduction as an incentive. The applicant has submitted a parking reduction request that includes a case study of 5 affordable senior housing projects managed by the applicant (National CORE). The average parking ratio of the projects studied was 0.92 stalls per unit and the average parking utilization was 63 percent. Additionally, there are a number of transportation options available for seniors in the City that reduce vehicle use. The project site is in close proximity to a transit stop and adjacent to many services, further reducing the parking demand. The applicant is requesting a parking ratio of 0.85 stalls per unit and is confident that the proposed parking ratio will adequately meet the projects parking demand. A 63 percent parking utilization based on the required 149 parking spaces, would be a parking demand of approximately 94 parking spaces, which translates into a parking buffer of approximately 25 parking spaces. K. Variance: The project includes property line walls that are over the 6-foot maximum permitted wall height. The north property line wall includes a retaining wall that ranges in height from 4 to 6 feet topped by a 6-foot high free standing wall, for a calculated height of 8 to 9 feet. Additionally, there is a 2.5-foot retaining wall proposed adjacent to the existing 6-foot high wall between the project site and the adjacent City fire station. In both cases, the additional wall height will only be visible on the applicant's side of the wall. The applicant has submitted a Variance for the additional wall height (DRC2017-00032). The findings of facts below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: E1—E5 Pg6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2016-00964, DR DRC2016-00814, DBA DRC2017-00156, VARIANCE DRC2017-00032 & TRPDRC2016-00965 COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 7 Finding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. Fact: The increase in wall height is necessary due to a 4 to 6 foot grade change between the project site and the Pacific Electric Tail to the north and due to the necessity for a 2.5 foot retaining wall along the east property line, adjacent to an existing 6 foot high free standing wall. Without the Variance, the applicant would be required to step the retaining walls, reducing the developable portion of the lot and the number of units that could be constructed. Finding: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. Fact: There is an up to 6-foot grade change between the project site and the Pacific Electric :Fr7to the north which requires the construction of a property line retaining wall. There is also a 2.5 foot grade change along the east property line which requires the placement of a retaining wall directly adjacent to an existing 6 foot high freestanding wall. Finding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Fact: Without an increase in the permitted wall heights, the developable portion of the project site would be reduced in order to step the retaining walls. In turn, reducing the number of units that could be constructed on the site. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact: It is common practice to grant a Variance for an increase in property line wall height where there is a grade change between a project site and the adjacent parcels of land. In this case, there is an up to 6 foot grade change along the north property line and 2:5 foot grade change along the east property line. The additional wall height will only be visible on the applicant's side of the wall. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact: The increased wall heights will not negatively impact the surrounding property owners as the additional wall height will only be visible on the project site. L. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC) on March 14, 2017. The DRC recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission with the addition of two minor design changes, the addition of trellis structures over select windows and the addition of board and batten siding on the south E1—E5 Pg7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2016-00964, DR DRC2016-00814, DBA DRC2017-00156, VARIANCE DRC2017-00032 & TRPDRC2016-00965 COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 8 elevation. The applicant was accepting of the proposed design changes and the attached plan have incorporated these changes. M. Technical Review Committee: The project was reviewed and approved by the Technical Review Committee (TRC) on March 14, 2017. N. Neighborhood Meeting: On March 1, 2017, a neighborhood meeting was conducted by the applicant at Goldy S. Lewis Community Center (11200 Base Line Road). No residents attended the meeting. O. SB1S and AB52 Tribal Consultation: In conformance with California State Bill (SB) 18, on November 9, 2016, staff sent a Tribal Consultation Request of the proposed project to a list of tribal communities provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. A letter dated December 5, 2016, was received by staff from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation requesting that a certified Native American monitor be on -site during any and all ground disturbances. Staff also sent out a Tribal Consultation request in conformance with California Assembly Bill (AB) 52, on February 23, 2017, of the proposed project to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, the San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. The City has not been contacted to date in regards to the (AB) 52 notification letter. A Mitigation Measure was added to the Initial Study requiring that a Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation certified Native American be on site during any and all ground disturbances. P. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and waste materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, planning and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library E1—E5 Pg8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2016-00964, DR DRC2016-00814, DBA DRC2017-00156, VARIANCE DRC2017-00032 & TRPDRC2016-00965 COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 9 services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. The City will benefit from approval of the project with the following: The additional units will help the City meet its regional housing needs (RHNA) requirements, as identified in the Housing Element of the General Plan by providing additional very low, low, and moderate income housing opportunities in the City. The additional units will address a significant and increasing community need for affordable senior housing. The Housing Element notes significant increases in the number of senior households in the City and the special needs of seniors with regard to living on limited incomes and accommodations for accessibility. An estimated 10% of the City's population is aged 65 or older, and an additional 10% of residents are between the ages of 55-65, indicating that the need for senior housing will only continue to increase with time. In addition, 25% of the senior households in the City are extremely low, very low or low income based on data from HUD. • A minimum 55-year affordable housing agreement/covenant will be established to ensure continued affordability; the provision of the units identified as affordable units in the project remain as such (which will also ensure compliance with the RHNA requirements, as noted above). • The site will be developed with substantial amenities, including a community center, an indoor fitness center, laundry facilities, bike storage, swimming pool and spa, and outdoor courtyards with barbeque picnic areas and fireplaces. • Infrastructure improvements will be constructed in conjunction with the project. • Increased sales tax revenue generated by new residents of the project patronizing businesses in the community. • Additional direct and indirectjobs supported by apartment home construction, operations and resident spending, including hundreds of construction jobs over a two year period, four full time employees once operational plus landscape, maintenance and other weekly/monthly service jobs. The project will also generate one-time impact fees, which are intended to offset services from the increased development. The following one-time impact fees will be accessed by the Engineering Department and are subject to change: 1. Library - $56,840 2. Drainage — $80,244 3. Transportation - $279,524 4. Animal Center - $12,320 5. Police - $28,280 E1—E5 Pg9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2016-00964, DR DRC2016-00814, DBA DRC2017-00156, VARIANCE DRC2017-00032 & TRPDRC2016-00965 COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 10 6. Park Land Acquisition - $426,860 7. Park Improvement - $251,160 8. Community and Recreation Centers - $171,360 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Plan Exhibit B - Cover Sheet Exhibit C - Site and Floor Plans Exhibit D - Roof Plan Exhibit E - Elevations and Sections Exhibit F -Wall and Fence Plan Exhibit G - Grading Plans Exhibit H - Landscape Plans Exhibit I - Design Review Committee Action Agenda for March 14, 2017 Exhibit J - Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Figure LU-8 Exhibit K - Density Bonus Agreement Exhibit L - Initial Study Parts I, ll, and III Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2016-00814 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2017-00032 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965 CB:TV/Is E1—E5 Pg10 m X CAM TOLL ER[[ RA wa¢ wDID p FNaml VM ND.__OI NCPIMUM RIIIFS[LWA N.11L114NW NE3 rvv�IwMl u�xi W RELIP%, a�pa lulu m 1�WI4 ��Im epwa Pg4PR[f[ROfiP NOTE SFEA9CXSRFFVNEOi SRf pIAfN5pN5 Au➢SEiC'CAS DAY CFEEK NUS SUE URIIAIWN MAP m x 2 03 00 N Day Creek Villas Affordable Senior Apartments South Elevation Vicinity Map (p Residential Unit Areas r' ,,144 - - 'Irvo Project Data Project Ana Calculations Shed Index Paddrg Count Applicable Codes Y v� ® Day Creek Villas - Affordable Senior Apartments Rancho Cucamonga. CA Cover Sheet I AO d131Ye11 t L r �jL i.ii Day Creek Villas - Affordable Senior Apartments Rancho Cucamonga, CA Site/ Level 1 Floor Plan Al 022120t] O O 0 m_ I m Ln 01 a Ln OI SI 0� oT tO - S 15I156 �� L-13 ` Day Creek Villas - Affordable Senior Apartments I Level 3 Floor Plan A3 Rancho Cucamonga, CA -- I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Day Creek Villas - Affordable Senior Apartments I Roof Plan A4 LM Rancho Cucamonga, CA 0221=7 m io -W M M A-M-01, M Z ERE jw-.-Z� , Day Creek Villas - Affordable Senior Apartments Rancho Cucamonga, CA rm Building Elevations A5 I (X 05 In I M�IfaY�la NBav�tln, ___-- { n 1 >m uvutwry.a FlavNon_ __ ___ k 0 Mo II V _ �B)Fv000 Corbel Day Creek Villas - Affordable Senior Apartments Rancho Cucamonga, CA Cove Raftertail - 3-1/2" x 5-1/2" x 24" C: Truss Rafter Talls ., . Courtyard Building A6 Elevations — — 0231TOP L 00 - PadmOm t. lb�T.11'd' nanmemx: trtr.e trmS Rerun. 8 • rza� tz2z ry�ze.aaen✓i e.x, unn- - _ _ —__--,+ia.w++.ew_ 4> E9 00 Ra Su Room SSex 8Yl1oO 11'C tx'T gM u.v — «T9Roomtxa'.trn' �r.q Pown, tza'. ern' •"�, Is)' e.d...v i ern U. Day Creek Villas - Affordable Senior Apartments Unit & Common Area Floor A7 Rancho Cucamonga, CA Plans —oxx xc O OO O rJ CD M;;,,;o eua,y_s.mm ��I�is. � ■��ar_ t7�r�-:�� D�I��i�3tl❑�7i ��Iy_ '��1 &9 1wf �li��.1 _��_�S�iE °❑'RR�i71i �t e sw sw1.n o. Day Creek Villas -Affordable Senior Apartments Rancho Cucamonga, CA Conceptual Sections A9 pPY1=7 LM_ ® Day Creek Villas - Affordable Senior Apartments • �� Rancho Cucamonga, CA 1 0 C --------------- Wall & Fence Plan A10 K N4-1 i kkk STATER BROS. MARKET r i �7 V A j� ICI ICI ICI SHOPS2 ---- -------- -- Is SHOPS3 eltm o LEGEND: urur¢scaxvueE:: ULL WDID FINECT SKET ND. —Or_ ACINMAP DAY CREEK VLLAS CONCEPWAL GRADNG nM S[CYKKVM J '� Ili � n— ail iL � � TPM.4 fAWPG PWiCgTiOflRMlp sscnnise SEEM OLLRFREE m SKIMMUD CITY of RANCHO COCAMONGA DAY CNffVL AS CCNCEPNALGAADWRAN-SECTOW 33 woio co-oz Rnunu enw Ne._or_ D I WATER QUALITY BMP LOCATIONS AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS L b I - • � 11 al_ — I I _ T _ _ 1 T StormTe�ch (�. enuen I .1. PROIECTSITE1 VICINITYMAP IV LEGEND PAAIYf-0N WJIIBWIAMIP�ECIION 1 NO o11e1�ommRena IO a NOTE: PROPOSED STORYTECH YC-AWO INFILTRATION CHAMBERS OR APPROVED EQUAL WDID PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR RESIDENTUAL PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA 'moN. , m" Am AC. ..SS I xD.IER. ml [cca¢ wrwmuws * wacu[ncnw SECtKKiFf rnm....neu ..._m— rm[c m 7 :: J:y_Z i' r�_iYl v d, [Jrt l r _! w w • w w r1 aG •. _I_' i .�.e u u • u u .I= .0 .. a -. ... .. �y r .. r r u .. _ all- r �ti..- w t•� cL �J�n' .r_ /\ \�Yr'""a � r r _+, ..�L i �r Y•'-q t �w v P Y �� ' I u � T L . e • u ] q `�V � a a. .0 ., .. ? ' r .. M Fu-.r i • -FM t • f �� r I * LEGEND: �� varrr 1 �l a I' b � � 1 4,.1 r I_f._fl II J i�b. IL LI..II IuI wneaavvmEs uwaro mmio nNtwro WDID /C) PROFECi SNER NO. —OF— CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN - - - - - - - - - - v, 'jj J40 0, - ------------ DAYCRUkBLVD. 0 WDID J_ MCINIW MAP -0� I)XIDES COMPANIES gal vr+ffi FROOR 1, A'r 1W111' mLII II. -Of l 9 SITE AND DRAINAGE PLAN llI I yi 1 � y� IL r � I � Y 9 tia+' ;1 0 rt J zt DA1 = 174355 SF '✓ ..AREA QBMP = 0.98.CFS ., �t III; t ._, r L S C.PMIYfUR MAMBUNCE AHl NSPECDON NOLP rAP 0.N6uNT FFIRJUTE NNllonol C.mrY.Yit, R]AR.nI,e x .nN..x.r wa•1 u.nw o..,u...,xw.�.x,a;<revx,o..Ew.c1�,..loneulo<..,.,w.�wE.,or1;<o„E�e.,. PROJECT SREI f F J f T T i i VICIINN "MAP LEGEND: � ' l I RARAAA VA#➢Ilea'SSWRAt`. VbPP➢X]¢Si it A .P�N.�., ' NY69 NL PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR RESIDENTUAL PURPOSES .Y IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAVONGA. .o COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' JANUARY. 2017 1. AIR. (A.. I NUUOEREO t01 WOOD d TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE SCHEDULES 1 __ _� y I�I li ift,I I�r1 i1 a1 T ,F4 .yfyi§) �i.41F�� _. W RIRBIfRf l6°ECIpN ADD IIANIENUCE tl1DE s CALL (EPA9TYTRCR WM9Wi£APDKaI£COMI 1 lau FREE Nalien.l4Cammity Renoiz nc NOTE: PROPOSED PRETREATMENT: VORTSENTRY OR INDIC d PROJECT SHEET NO_OF_ WIM%— PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENTPLAN FOR RESIDENTUAL. PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CAUFORNIA JANUiRY. 2017 ..... EPOSS 1 .,,.m ED, DAY CREEK VL AS WATER OUAUIY MANAGENIM PLAN NoimnUSNOO HOJ ION.. it Ji it El-E5 Pg3l MARCH 14, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Ray Wimberly X 7 00 P M Rich Macias X Candyce Burnett Donald Granger X Alternates: Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca Additional Staff Present: Mike Smith, Senior Planner; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Dominick Perez, Associate Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS None This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. Page 1 of 4 EXHIBIT I E1—E5Pg32 IWIr%I\VI1 1- y L.V 1 I - I .VV r.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE C1. SIGN PERMIT DRC2017-00106 - KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. - A request to remove an existing illuminated wall sign and replace with two (2) new illuminated wall signs on an existing retail store (Target) located within the Community of the Terra Vista Community Plan at 10576 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1077-423-15. The Committee briefly discussed the project and recommended approval with no issues. C2. DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2017-00071 - NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL - A request to modify Design Review DRC2008-00909 by deleting a Condition of Approval, in Planning Commission Resolution No. 14-05, that required an access easement on the subject property as part of the approval for the construction and operation of an animal hospital in the General Commercial (GC) located at 7289 Amethyst Avenue - APNs: 0202-161-10, -11, and -20. Related file: Design Review DRC2008-00909. Staff presented background on the Design Review application that was approved by the City in January 2014. The applicant's reason for requesting the deletion of the subject condition of approval was explained. The presentation included a background on the applicant's efforts to comply with the condition of approval, and the difficulty he encountered while attempting to acquire the signature of the neighboring property owner that was needed for access easement. Staff also explained his attempts to assist the applicant. The Committee recognized that the applicant and Staff had exhausted the available means for obtaining the signature. The Committee recommends to the Planning Commission the approval of the deletion of the subject condition of approval. C3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00814 - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low - Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1089-031-36. Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Development Agreement DRC2017-00156, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Staff provided a project overview to the Committee and raised 2 design issues regarding adding additional trellis structures of the select windows and additional board and batten siding on the south elevation. The applicant stated that they had no issue with addition of the requested architectural enhancements. The Commissioners recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review with the agreed upon architectural enhancements. C4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20042 - NH WEAVER LANE, LLC - A request to subdivide 18.2 acres of land into 26 lots for the purposes of developing 26 single-family residences for a site located on the east side of Camelian Street Page 2 of 4 Ell —E5Pg33 MARCH 14, 2017 - 7:00 P.m. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS Room CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE and north of Hillside Road in the Very Low (VL) District (A — 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) and within the Hillside Overlay District -APN: 1061-261-01. Related records: Hillside Design Review DRC2016-00377, Variance DRC2016-00748, Variance DRC2017-00014 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00376. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00377 — NH WEAVER LANE, LLC - A request for site plan and architectural review of 26 single-family residences on 18.2 acres of land related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20042, located on the east side of Carnelian Street and north of Hillside Road in the Very Low (VL) District (.1 — 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) and within the Hillside Overlay District - APN: 1061-261-01. Related records: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20042, Variance DRC2016-00748, Variance DRC2017- 00014 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00376. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Staff provided a project overview to the Committee. Commissioner Macias asked staff whether each lot provided an adequate area for a horse corral that met the required 70-foot buffer from the neighboring residences. He also stated that he wanted staff to provide the Commissioners with an update at the Planning Commission outlining how the future homeowner would be informed about the maximum permitted lot coverage. Staff informed the Committee that each lot would provide the required horse corral area at the required separation distance from the neighboring residences. The applicant, Bryan Avilla, then provided the Committee with a brief overview on the design of the project site and stated that they would provide the new property owners with a disclosure statement outlining the maximum lot coverage. The meeting was then opened for public comment. Joseph Cowan, president of the Alta Loma Riding Club, asked whether project density was calculated from gross lot size and stated that the Alta Loma Riding Club was concerned the project only provided 1 point of access, that the equestrian trail system did not loop and that the lots that were near maximum lot coverage would not be able to construct a covered corral area. Staff stated that lot coverage was calculated from gross lot size, as required by the Development Code. The applicant stated that the stream bed running through the site limited providing a loop trail and that the property owners of the public street to the east were opposed to a street connection with the project. A second member of the public, Mrs. Judith Brennan, asked whether the project would provide an equestrian connection to Carnelian Street and asked whether a horse trail could be provided adjacent to the east property line, so horses and walkers would not be required to walk in the street. Staff stated that the project would provide 2 equestrian connection points to Carnelian Street and would have the applicant investigate whether it was technically possible to provide an equestrian trail along the east property line. The Committee then recommended that the project move forward to the Trail Advisory Committee for their review and to Planning Commission for final review. Page 3 of 4 E1—E5Pg34 MARCH 14, 2017 - 7:00 P.m. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE C5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00713 - LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit multi -family development on 12.1 acres of land within the Medium High (MH) District (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway - APN: 1077-422-97. Related records: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Minor Exception DRC2016- 00716, Minor Exception DRC2017-00159 and Pre -Application DRC2016-00361. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Staff provided a project overview to the Committee and raised 2 design issues regarding adding additional pilasters around the pool areas and wood trellis structures to the front elevation of the carriage unit, which are currently a homebuyer's option. The applicant agreed to add the pilasters around the pool area and wants to leave it up to the homeowners as to whether they wanted to purchase the trellis structure to the front elevation of the carriage unit as an option. They went on to state that at a similar project that they recently constructed, no homeowners selected the trellis structure option. The Commissioners agreed with the applicant that the trellis structures would not be required. The Commissioners recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review with the addition of pilasters around the pool area. D. ADJOURNMENT 8:56 P.M. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist II with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on day, Thursday, March 2, 2017, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Jennifer Palacios Office Specialist II City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 4 of 4 E1—E5Pg35 I m W IF •/ 1unIIm.l.. "�TEwill� IIIII�enwax CITY OF UPLAND DSNM w HAWNS, IF R•NHaOa:nvgei�l w+mnvla ��,•y�y�� IF Ra To C+pnplgaPaiY et WflPitl liYer¢1 • DYMn,m Regain CSNvna WiGlm Lvx�iuha t . cWbru PoIYaY Wewrtat„trm: RIm H(, IS NYIY'IYRe1T'C: oI1MryL gGcea C,I 1\I...... It % sn MYCIIC IIdneWOa§on Routes uew� d• F.oMY B'Y:Iem OlRole9l) {Ir{' •�•• Vd`F]sK RpWw CatEw CITY OF Y••r AIdNSNiyMa 65arYx Fe RYAwY FONTANA OyY�,�vi „y��i yya Fe RaNayi t •- da{R Rm1(GNuve Pwl el HhlvcY MYnali i RBR•tAj�F.N CEYNv-YAY --- sane a Em:mtc �.� RwYayv, NX¢ v�w[evrY W W m,LYf pne Nn x1,1vp1Y•f([.lm. ivrtc Pygc O�w:vga �HMien&mvN�efx4Aaam. dE 1 I 'CITY OF FONTANA i GITY CSTp RIO ! j w> t Fimire LU & AS Historic Resources AbwynO bMUse, fommorMry Dealpn, oMRht•vt Rezar¢t RANCHO CUCAMONGA Gt NERAE P:AN 1LL119 m Proposed i �_ bra ��rabn �� 1r !1 � f+► - _ 1 nn m airs ar R..ILjiftmEN L-. '��hmlml�ll''ller_l�n.E��TJIw!!i�CL�►n_r, �� r��h�3��,it� _ 1111111111 muuniar n m ft Cey'`` i=mJ� z]E�iLr� 3E� �1 _efll wW, !� III, - FA y �7j 1 vf w 'i .3�i.�.. { ailr['-VrLw i�n rllE„tF - hn�/�rs!� 111��'j I^__��- • epn r.. t P.nrJRt+n+ P P•j1 'k �n IF � �1�'A �=L��1111►'c, 1 lilr�rr� � .. �� •rZr�ar ` ri. GI �� 1`-.-.. C• MMU IV iu-i�lvFaa . el#w�r�re/1�rr RANCHO COC AAAONGA GE NEflALPIAN Figure LU-& ELLm RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: City Clerk With a copy to: Day Creek Senior Housing Partners LP c/o National Community Renaissance 9421 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Chief Financial Officer APNs: 1089-031-36 c.aiu�.acvvr.�a Exempt from Recording Fees Pursuant to Government Code Section 27383 DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT DRC2017-00156 (SENIOR CITIZENS AFFORDABLE HOUSING) THIS DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is dated as of June 7, 2017 and is entered into by and between DAY CREEK SENIOR HOUSING PARTNERS LP, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (the "Developer"), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a California municipal corporation (the "City"). RECITALS A. California Government Code Section 65915(d) provides that in addition to a density bonus (not applicable here), a city may, by agreement with a developer, grant up to three incentives or concessions that the applicant requests when a developer agrees to construct housing for low income households. B. The City has implemented California Government Code Section 65915(d) by enacting Municipal Code Section 17.46.040B, which subject to certain limitations, contemplate such incentives to encourage development of affordable housing for low income households. C. Developer has requested City to consider the approval of a density bonus agreement which Will grant concessions for Developer's development of the real property in City on Exhibit "A" ("Site"). The Site is located within the Victoria Planned Community. D. The Developer proposes to construct a senior housing residential project, consisting of low income units, on the Site. Said project contemplated by Developer will require two incentives/concessions from the residential development standards in the Victoria Planned Community. The Developer is not requesting a density bonus for this project. EXHIBIT K -1- E1—E5Pg38 E. It is the desire of City to encourage developments designed to provide affordable rental units for senior residents of the City. In furtherance of that desire, the City is hereby willing to grant concessions to Developer as provided by the terms of this Agreement, which is a so-called "density bonus agreement" contemplated and required by Municipal Code Chapter 17.46.040. F. City and Developer have entered into a Disposition, Development and Loan Agreement dated in 2016 which obligates the City to sell the Site to Developer subject to certain conditions, including the condition that a "Development Agreement' be approved by City and executed; however, Developer and City have determined that the only purpose of such condition was to provide for the affordable housing incentives described herein, and that Municipal Code Chapter 17.46 requires a so- called "density bonus agreement' under that Chapter, not a statutory development agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: I . Definitions. In this Agreement, the following terns shall have the foll I owing meaning: a. "Affordable Rents" shall mean the total charges for rent, utilities, and related services in an amount not to exceed the amount of rent permitted under California Health and Safety Code Section 50053 and Sections 69.10 — 6932 of Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations. b. "Area Median Income" shall mean the median income for households in San Bernardino County, California, as published from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") in a manner consistent with the determination of median gross income under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, and as defined in Title 25, California Code of Regulations, Section 6932. In the event that such income determinations are no longer published by HUD, or are not updated for a period of at least 18 months, the City shall either use the income determinations used by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee or may use income determinations that are reasonably similar with respect to methods of calculation to those previously published by HUD. C. "City" is the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. d. "Project' is the development approved by City comprised of one hundred and forty (140) apartment units, recreational and common area facilities, parking spaces and other amenities on the Site, all as set forth more fully in the site plan for Environmental Assessment and Design Review DRC2016-00814 submitted by Developer and approved by City. The Project is subject to the conditions of approval which are not changed; altered or modified by this Agreement. C. "Qualified Tenants" shall mean households consisting of a person who is sixty- two (62) years of age or older and any qualified permanent residents under the applicable provisions of California Civil Code Section 51.3 and the federal Fair Housing Act (except to the extent the Project utilizes federal funds whose programs have differing definitions for senior projects in which case those definitions will apply), and whose annual household income does not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the Area Median Income. 2. Binding Effect of Agreement. The Developer hereby subjects the Site and development thereon to the covenants, reservations and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement in perpetuity. The City and the Developer hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be -2- 11231-000112050037v4.doc El—E5 Pg39 binding upon the Developer's successors and assigns and successor to any interest in the Project. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the development or any portion thereof shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered and accepted subject to the covenants, reservations and restrictions expressed in this Agreement, regardless of whether such covenants, reservations and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. 3. Relationship of Parties. It is understood that the contractual relationship between City and Developer is such that Developer is an independent party and is not the agent of City for any purpose whatsoever. 4. Restrictions on Rental Units: Qualified Tenants. It is expressly understood by the parties hereto that the Project has been specifically designed to meet the unique needs of senior tenants. Except for one (1) manager's unit, the apartment units in the Project shall be rented, occupied, leased or subleased to households which include at least one Qualified Tenant. 5. Rental Reouirements; Affordable Rent. One hundred and thirty-nine (139) of the units in the Project, not including the one unit for a resident manager, shall be rented, leased or held available for Qualified Tenants at Affordable Rents. 6. No Conversion. During the tern hereof, all residential units in the Project shall remain rental units. During the term hereof, no apartment unit in the Project shall be eligible for conversion from rental units to condominiums, townhomes or any other common interest subdivision without consent of the City Council. On -site Manager. A full-time manager shall be provided on the Project site in the manager's unit. 8. Submission of Materials and Annual Review. Prior to occupancy, Developer shall submit to City tenant selection procedures which shall detail the methods which Developer shall use to advertise the availability of apartments in the Project and screening mechanisms which Developer intends to use to limit the occupancy of the apartments to Qualified Tenants, including the income restrictions on some of the units as set forth in this Agreement. On or before April 15 of each year following the first leasing of any apartment (other than the manager's unit), the Developer, or its representative, shall file a certificate of continuing program compliance with the City. Each such report shall contain such information as City may require including, but not limited to, the following: a. Rent schedules then in effect, including utility charges (if any); b. A project occupancy profile; C. A description of the physical condition and maintenance procedures for the Project, including apartment units, landscaping, walkways and recreational areas. d. The number of persons per unit; e. Tenant name; Initial occupancy date; -3- uz31-0001\?05oo37v4.doc El —ES Pg40 g. Rent paid per month; h. Gross income per year; Percent of rent paid in relation to income; and Copies of all documents used by Developer to certify the tenant as a Qualified Tenant. City shall be allowed to conduct physical inspections of the Project as it shall deem necessary, provided that said inspections do not unreasonably interfere with the normal operations of the Project and reasonable notice is provided. City shall repair any damage and shall defend, indemnify and hold Developer harmless from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, costs, expenses incurred by Developer relating in any way to City's inspections and investigations. 9. Tenant Selection. Contracts and Rules and Regulations. After receipt of applications for income restricted units, Developer shall determine the eligibility of the occupancy under the terms of this Agreement. Verification of tenant income eligibility shall lie based on the following information and other information if permitted by the California Tax Allocation Committee for the low income housing tax credit program: a. Income verification form from the Social Security Administration and/or the California Department of Social Services, if the applicant receives income from either or both agencies; b. Income tax return for the most recent tax year; C. TRW or similar financial search; d. Income verification from all current employers; and e. If the applicant is unemployed and has no tax return, another form of independent verification. Developer shall deliver copies thereof to City upon written request. All agreements for rental of all apartment units in the Project shall be in writing. The form of proposed rent or lease agreement shall be reviewed and approved by City prior to use. Such agreement shall include all rules and regulations governing tenancy within the Project. 10. Termination and Eviction of Tenants. A tenancy may be terminated without the termination being deemed an unlawful eviction under the following circumstances: a. The death of the sole tenant of the unit; b. By the tenant at the expiration of the term of occupancy or otherwise upon thirty (30) days' written notice; C. By abandonment of the premises by the tenant; or d. By failure of a tenant to execute or renew a lease. -4- t1231-oomM-asoos7v4.doc El—E5 Pg41 An affordable unit initially occupied by a Qualified Tenant shall be deemed occupied by a Qualified Tenant until such affordable unit is vacated, even if the tenant's household income subsequently increases to an amount that exceeds the maximum allowable income level for its initial income category so long as satisfactory actions are taken to ensure that all vacancies are filled in accordance with this Agreement until the noncompliance is corrected. Upon termination of occupancy of an affordable unit by a tenant, such affordable unit shall be deemed to be continuously occupied by a household of the same income level as the initial income level of the vacating tenant, until such affordable unit is reoccupied, at which time the income character of the affordable unit shall be determined by the income of the incoming tenant. The income of all persons residing in the affordable unit shall be considered for purposes of calculating the applicable income. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, no less than one person per bedroom shall be allowed; no more than two persons shall be permitted to occupy a one bedroom affordable unit; and no more than three persons shall be permitted to occupy a two bedroom affordable unit. Any termination of a tenancy other than those listed above in this Section shall constitute a lawful eviction only if: (i) Developer conduct it in compliance with the provisions of California law and (ii) the lease is terminated then only for material noncompliance with the terms of the applicable rental agreement after written notice and the expiration of a reasonable cure period. 11. Insurance. Developer shall keep the Project and all improvements thereon insured at all times against loss or damage endorsement and such other risks, perils or coverage as Developer may determine. During the term hereof, the Project shall be insured to its full insurance replacement value. 12. Maintenance Guarantee. Developer shall comply with all City maintenance standards for the Project enacted from time to time. 13. Standards and Restriction Pertaining to Development of the Site. The following specific restrictions shall apply to the use of the Site during the term of this Agreement: a. Developer is required to obtain all necessary land use entitlements, approvals and permits for the Project. b. Only residential uses of the real property shall be permitted in the Project. 14. Development Incentives. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65915(d) and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.46.040.B., the City grants Developer the following development incentives for development of the Project: a. The amount of required private open space per dwelling unit is decreased from 150 square feet for ground floor dwelling units and 100 square feet for upper floor dwelling units to 107 square feet for ground floor dwelling units and 80 square feet for upper floor dwelling units; and b. The required number of on -site parking spaces is decreased to a minimum ratio of 0.85 parking spaces per unit, with 82 carport stalls and 37 uncovered spaces. -5- 11231-0001L0500370.doc El—E5 Pg42 15. Project Design Amenities for Senior Citizens. The Project open space, buildings and individual apartments shall be designed with physical amenities catering to the needs and desires of the senior citizen residents. The following physical amenities shall be substantially included in the Project: a. Unit sizes shall be an average of 600 square feet for 1-bedroom residential units and 890 square feet for 2-bedroom residential units; b. Elevator service shall be provided to all upper story apartments; C. All common access areas in the Project such as entryways, walkways, and hallways will be wide enough to accommodate wheelchairs; d. The Project will meet all applicable current requirements for access and design imposed by law as administered by the City building and safety department, including, but not limited to, the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 3601 et seq.), the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. See. 12101 et seq.), and the regulations promulgated at Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations that relate to access for persons with disabilities or handicaps; e. All units shall possess secured entryways off a common enclosed hallway; and f. The Project is designed to encourage social contact by providing at least one common room (the Project community room) and at least some common open space (the Project's fitness room, pool, outdoor fire pit lounge, courtyard and garden areas). 16. Indemnification. Developer shall defend, indemnify and hold City and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees harmless from claims, liabilities, losses, damages and costs and expenses arising from or relating to personal injuries, including death, and property damage which may arise from the activities of Developer or those of its contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on its behalf which relate to the Project. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this provision shall not apply to any such claims which arise out of, or by reason of, the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. 17. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or canceled, in whole or in part, only by mutual written consent of the parties. 18. Event of Default. Developer is in default under this Agreement upon the happening of one or more of the following events or conditions: a. If a warranty, representation or statement is made or furnished by Developer to City and is inaccurate in any material respect when it was made; b. A breach by Developer of any of the provisions or terms of this Agreement, after notice and opportunity to cure as provided in Section 19. 19. Enforcement. In the event of a default under the provisions of this Agreement by Developer, City shall give written notice to Developer, and if such violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of City within thirty (30) days after such notice is given, then City may, without further notice, declare a default under this Agreement and City may then enforce as any normal violation of the standards and provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code applicable to this Agreement. However, notwithstanding the foregoing, City may at any time apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Developer of any provision of this Agreement. -6- 11231-0001\205oo37v4.doc E1—E5 Pg43 20. Developer Representation Re: Priority: No Waiver of Remedies. Developer represents and warrants that this Agreement, when recorded, is senior and prior to all deeds of trust and other liens, except for liens for property taxes and assessments not yet due. City does not waive any claim of defect in performance by Developer if on periodic review City does not enforce or terminate this Agreement. Nonperformance by Developer shall not be excused because performance by Developer of the obligations herein contained would be unprofitable, difficult or expensive or because of a failure of any third party or entity, other than City. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement are available to the parties to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 21. Rights of Lenders Under this Agreement. Should Developer place or cause to be placed any encumbrance or lien on the Project, or any part thereof, the beneficiary ("Lender") of said encumbrance or lien, including, but not limited to, deeds of trust, shall have the right at any time during the term of this Agreement and the existence of said encumbrance or lien to: a. Do any act or thing required of Developer under this Agreement, and any such act or thing done or performed by Lender shall be as effective as if done by Developer itself, b. Realize on the security afforded by the encumbrance or lien by exercising foreclosure proceedings or power of sale or other remedy afforded in law or in equity or by the security document evidencing the encumbrance or lien; C. Transfer, convey or assign the title of Developer to the Project to any purchaser at any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a trust deed; and d. Acquire and succeed to the interest of Developer by virtue of any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale is conducted pursuant to a court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a trust deed. 22. Notice to Lender. If Developer shall have provided City in writing with the name of the Lender and a copy of its recorded deed of trust, then City shall give written notice of any default or breach under this Agreement by Developer to such Lender and if the default can be cured by the payment of money, City shall give Lender the opportunity after service of the notice to cure the breach or default within sixty (60) days after delivery of said notice. 23. Notices. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be provided by certified mail, return receipt requested, at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other such address as may be later specified by the parties hereto in a notice given pursuant to this Section. Developer: Day Creek Senior Housing Partners LP c/o National Community Renaissance 9421 Haven Avenue City: Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Chief Financial Officer City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive -7- 1123 1 -000 1\2050037v4.doc El —ES Pg44 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: City Manager 24. Attorneys' Fees. In any proceedings arising from the enforcement of this Agreement or because of an alleged breach or default hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and its reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during the proceeding as may be fixed within the discretion of the court. 25. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. 26. Partial Invalidity. If any provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality or enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. 27. Recordation. This Agreement shall be recorded in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino. 28. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence of every provision hereof in which time is a factor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties and shall be effective on the Effective Date set forth herein. DEVELOPER: DAY CREEK SENIOR HOUSING PARTNERS LP, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation By: Day Creek Senior Housing Partners MGP, LLC, a California limited liability company its general partner By: National Community Renaissance of California, a California nonprofit corporation, its sole member/manager M. Steve PonTell' Chief Executive Officer CITY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: M James Markman City Attorney -8- 1123 1 -000 1\2050037v4.doc E1—E5 Pg45 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of On before me, (insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (Seal) -9- 11231-0001\2050037v4.doe El—E5 Pg46 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF On , before me, (insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) -10- 1123f-000f\2osoo37v4.doc E1—E5 Pg47 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE THE FOLLOWING REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA: PARCEL "A" BEING PORTIONS OF LOTS 21 AND 22 OF ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 20, PAGE 1 OF MAPS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH, VACATED PER INSTRUMENT No. 92-447926, RECORDED OCTOBER 28, 1992 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT No. 619 RECORDED JUNE 14, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT No. 2006-0406609, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 21,, SAID POINT BEING SOUTH 00012'36" WEST 575.70 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 21; THENCE, ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND ITS NORTHERLY PROLONGATION, NORTH 00012'36" EAST 615.70 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID INSTRUMENT No. 92- 447926; THENCE, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID INSTRUMENT No. 92-447926, SOUTH 89011,41" EAST 342.01 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID INSTRUMENT No. 92-447926, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 1 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT No. 619 RECORDED JUNE 14, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT No. 2006-0406609, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID INSTRUMENT No. 92-447926 AND THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 22, SOUTH 00-12'48" WEST 418.19 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FIREHOUSE COURT, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2 AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 61.04 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 89050'34" WEST; THENCE, LEAVING SAID EAST LINE AND ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28023'25" AN ARC LENGTH OF 30.25 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 42-24'52" WEST 51.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89017'07" WEST 195.07 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 44017'06" WEST 171.66 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LAND IS DESCRIBED AS PARCEL A OF LL/A 2005-00002 RECORDED 12/04/2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2005 — 531707 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. -11- u231-0001\2050037v4.aoc El—E5 Pg48 Print Fo"rm ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) RANCHO (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) CUCAMONGA Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinance's, and Guidelines; the. California Environmental ;Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. it is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic; noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part 11 as required by CEQA. Inaddition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible Ito pay or reimburse the City, its agents; officers, and/or consultants foe all costs for the preparation, .review, analysis; recommendations; mitigations, etc.; of any special studies or reports. INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONS WILL NOTBE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: Day Creek Senior Villas DRC2016-00814 Name & Address of project owner(s): National Community Renaissance of California 9421 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Name &.Address of developer or project sponsor: National Community Renaissance of California 9421 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 EXHIBIT L Page 1 of 10 E1-E5 Pg49 Contact Person & Address. Alexa Washburn, Vice President of Planning, 9421 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga . CA91730; aashburn@nationalcore.org Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Telephone Number: (909) 483-2444 or direct (949) 394-7996 Information indicated by an asterisk (:) is not required of non -construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. "1) Provide a full scale (8-112 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, -south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of significant featuresfrom the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): terminus of Firehouse Court (north of Baseline and west of Day Creek) 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): 1089-031-36-0-00 *5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 4.0 acres '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed 4.0 acres dedications): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): A General Plan Amendment is required to replace a Canyon Live Oak Tree that is classified as a Heritage and designated as a Point of Historic Interest in the General Plan (Figure LU-8: Historic Resources). The GPA is required to remove the tree from a map showing the location of all the historic resources in the City. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 2 of 10 2 L, E1—E5 Pg50 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Tree Removal Permit - DRC2016-00965 Removal and replacement of a Canyon Live Oak Tree Certificate of Appropriateness - DRC2016-00966 to remove and replace Canyon Live Oak tree Variance - DRC2017-00032 for additional wall height (to implement retaining walls) Development Agreement - DRC2017-00156 Agreement for density bonus concessions 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The proposed project site is an undeveloped vacant parcel bordered by the Day Creek Fire Station to the east, single-family residences and the Rails to Trails multi -use trail to the north, a commercial development under construction to the south, and a fenced equipment/truck yard to the west. The site elevation is approximately 1,332 to 1,345 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The site is rectangular in shape, and the topography of the project area is sloped to the south. Mapped soils on the site are Tujunga gravelly loamy sand, 0 to 9 percent slopes and Tujunga loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (WebSoil Survey). Soils observed on the site appeared consistent with this designation and have a sandy soil substrate, that is punctuated with rock and cobble. The site historically was located within an alluvial fan and the soils on site are remnant of this association with the alluvial fan. The site is highly disturbed and the total vegetation cover is approximately 60 percent. The vegetation on site is dominated by a dense monotypic stand of hairy yerba santa at the southwest portion of t while the remainder of the site is primarily bare ground sparsely vegetated by poor quality California buckwhed scrub interspersed with California sagebrush, shortpod mustard, and telegraph weed. Other plants observed on site include scalebroom, chemise mountain mahogany, Mexican elderberry, wedgeleaf ceanothus and deerweed. A mature canyon live oak tree in declining health is west of Firehouse Court along the southern site boundary. Wildlife species observed during the survey include mourning dove, lesser goldfinch, house finch, common side -blotched lizards and desert cottontail. No drainage features, ponded areas, wetlands, or riparian habitat subject to jurisdiction by the CDFW, USACE, and/or RWQCB were found within the project site. Source - LSA Associates, Biological Resources Assessment Survey for the Day Creek Villas, October 2016. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 3 of 10 E1—E5 Pg51 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): No cultural resources were identified with the project area. Source - LSA Associates, Cultural Resource Assessment for Day Creek -Baseline Development Project, October 2016. 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: Existing noise sources include existing residential homes and any activity on the Pacific Electric Bike Trail no of the site, activities associated with the Day Creek Firestation 173 located east of the site, and transportation (�� related noise from nearby roadways including Day Creek Boulevard (east) and Baseline Road (to the south). Refer to Noise Impact Study prepared by Urban Crossroads, October 2016. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary. Three story affordable senior apartment building with 131 one bedroom units that average 635 SF and 9 two bedroom units that average 915 SF. 119 parking stalls are provided, 82 of which are provided in carport stalls and 37 in uncovered stalls. Amenities include swimming pool/ spa, fitness center, community center with lobby and lounge, and outdoor courtyards with BBQ picnic areas and fireplaces. Project also includes a 595 SF maintenance building. The building height ranges from approximately 39 to 40 feet. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): To the west of the project site is a maintenance yard operated by San Bernardino County Flood Control District to the east is Day Creek Firestation #173 approximately two -stories in height, to the north is the Pacific Electric multi -purpose trail and further north a tract of two-story, single-family homes, and to the south is land under construction for a new commercial shopping center (Day Creek Marketplace). Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 El—E5 Pg52 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No, the proposed project is well designed and compatible with surrounding uses. The project will complete Firehouse Court with a building that is of similar architectural style to the adjacent fire station and the shopping center under construction to the south. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on -site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Due to the low traffic volumes generated by the Project long term, no exterior noise mitigation is required. Construction noise is temporary, intermittent and of short duration, and will not present any long-term impacts; however, noise abatement measures will be implemented - construction activities will be limited to day time h� all equipment will have proper mufflers, and equipment will be staged furthest away from sensitive uses. See `16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: There is a large specific Canyon Live Oak tree located at the southeast corner of the site which was given a Historic Landmark designation by the Historic Preservation Commission on Oct. 21, 1987. The health of the tree has declined to a point where the City's arborist and Applicant's arborist have concluded that the tree cannot be preserved. Thus the tree will be removed and replaced with a large specimen Canyon Live Oak tree with wall seat located directly south of thlu 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: No drainage features, ponded areas, or wetlands were found within the project site. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at (909) 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 35,840 Peak use (gal/Day) 35,840 b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. © Septic Tank x© Sewer. ff septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at (909) 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 26,66 b. Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac) Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 E1—E5Pg53 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units:140 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 140 affordable rental units for seniors (age 62+) 21) Anticipated range ofsale prices and/orrents: 22) Sale Price(s) $. to $ Rent (per month) $276 to $636 Specify number of bedroomsby unit type: 141 one bedroom units averaging 635 square feet and 9 two bedroom units averaging 920 square feet. 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 1 ,persons for one bedroom units and 2 persons for two bedroom units. 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project., Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment 8: 0 a. Elementary: _ 0 b. Junior High: 0 c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: Updated 4/11/2013 Page 6 of 10 El—E5 Pg54 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 27) Indicate hours of operation: 26) Number of employees: Total., Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salaryranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: *31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequateservice to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. Fire has reviewed plans; water, sewer and flood control have not been contacted by the Applicant yet and will be conditioned to do so prior to construction. Updated 4/1112013 Page 7 of 10 E1—ES Pg55 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCBs; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. None - A search of selected government databases was conducted by Leighton using the EDR Radius Report environmental database report system. The subject site was not identified in the EDR report. A limited soil investigation was performed; chemicals of potential concern were not detected above residential human health screening levels. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and 'proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. . No 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may uired to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamgnga. Date: March 13, 2017 Updated 4/11/2013 Title: Vice President of Page 8 of 10 El—E5 Pg56 ATTACHMENT"A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single -Family Multi -Family Neighborhood' Commercial General Commercial Office Professional Institutional/Government Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flows Single -Family Multi -Family General Commercial Office Professional Industrial Park Large GeneralIndustrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons -per EDU' per day 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/day/acre 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updated 4/1112013 Page of 10 El-B Pg57 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High. School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 10 of 10 El-E5Pg58 M 0 M1 LSA LEGEND Q Project Location o loon 2oao HE, SOURCE: USGS 7.5quad - Guaitl (1981), CA Project Location soc (• 32 - >a F_ Ptiwatida , ' � I e 9 a \ C b •t • y vO a, 1 �1 m FIGURE 1 Day Creek Villas Regional and Project Location 1:\NCO1601\GIS\ProjectLocatlon USGS.mid (10/25/2016) El—E5 Pg59 Photo 2; View facing northeast across study area. "Alto IMPA Ain (10/25120161 Day Creek Villas Site Photographs El-E5Pg60 NV.I i\rvcolsot10t5Ee onotm cartlo(35/fold Photo 3: View facing southeast towards center of the site. Day Creek Villas Site Photographs El-E5Pg61 Photo 5: View facing southwest at stand of hairy yerba santa. LSA I:\NCO1601\G\Site Plwtas.<dr (10/25/2016) FIGURES Day Creek Villas Site Photographs E1—E5Pg62 wr A f City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017- 00156, Design Review DRC2016-00814, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Variance DRC2017-00032, Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965 2. Related Files: N/A 3. Description of Project: The project is for the development of a 140-unit multiple -family affordable senior housing project on 4 acres of land west of Day Creek Boulevard, at the terminus of Firehouse Court. The project includes a General Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00964) to amend General Plan Figure LU-8, which shows the location of historic resources within the City. There is a tree on the project site that was given a Historic Landmark Designation. Removal of the tree also requires approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2016-00966) by the Historic Preservation Commission and a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2016-00965). The project also includes a Density Bonus Agreement (DRC2017-00156) and a Variance (DRC2017-00032) to permit walls over 8 feet in height due to a grade difference between the project site and the adjacent properties. The project site is on one parcel of land; APN: 1089-031-36. 4. Project Sponsor Name and Address: National Community Renaissance of California 9421 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Low Medium (LM) 6. Zoning: Low Medium 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The vacant project site is generally rectangular in shape and drains roughly from north to south, with a grade change of approximately 10 feet from the north to south property lines. The site is highly disturbed with a total vegetation cover of approximately 60 percent. There is a large specimen Canyon Live Oak tree located at the southeast corner of the site that is proposed to be removed because of declining health. To the west of the project site is a maintenance yard operated by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District within the Low Medium (LM) and Open Space (OS) Districts of the Victoria Community Plan; to the east is Day Creek Fire Station #173, within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; to the north is the Pacific Electric trail; and, to the south is land that is under construction with a new commercial center (Day Creek Village) within the Village Commercial (VC) District of the Victoria Community Plan. The project will take vehicle and pedestrian access from Firehouse Court, with a secondary gated Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) provided to the future commercial center to the south. The project will also provide a gated pedestrian connection to the Pacific Electric Trail and a pedestrian connection from Firehouse Court to the new commercial center under construction to the south. The land use and zoning designation of the project site is Low -Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 E1—E5Pg64 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00814 Page 2 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tabe van der Zwaag (909) 477-2750, extension 4316 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) GLOSSARY — The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD — California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD — Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR — Environmental Impact Report FEIR — Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx — Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PMio — Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB — Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD — South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP — Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact," 'Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than -Sig nificant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓) Aesthetics (✓) Biological Resources (✓) Greenhouse Gas Emissions () Land Use & Planning () Population & Housing () Transportation/Traffic (✓ ) Agricultural Resources (✓) Cultural Resources (j Hazards & Waste Materials O Mineral Resources () Public Services () Utilities & Service Systems (✓) Air Quality (✓) Geology &Soils (✓) Hydrology & Water Quality (✓) Noise () Recreation () Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (✓) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a 'Potentially Significant Impact' or 'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg65 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon t proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: Reviewed By: -7 Date: _31/V/ jr- Date: e Rev 9-16 E1—E5Pg66 Initial Studylfor DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incor crated impact Im act EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? () () () (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views ink the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. Day Creek Boulevard, which runs approximately 300 feet east of the project site, is a special boulevard and a designated view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. The development of the project site will not negatively impact the Day Creek Boulevard view corridor. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The vacant site is located west of Day Creek Boulevard at the terminus of Firehouse Court and is characterized by a multi -use trail and residential development to the north, by land under construction with a commercial center to the south, by a City fire station to the east and by a San Bernardino County Flood Control District maintenance yard to the west. On -site vegetation consists of Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub and ruderal vegetation. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of the project as the proposed affordable senior apartment units are designed with a similar architectural theme to the adjacent City fire station and the future commercial center to the south and will become a larger part of the community. The project was reviewed by City's Design Review Committee and is consistent with the Development Code and Victoria Community Plan design guidelines. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. Rev 9-16 E1—E5Pg67 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: f P g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incor crated Impact Im act 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (✓) Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re -zoning of, () () () (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest () () () (✓) land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located west of Day Creek Boulevard at the terminus of Firehouse Court and is characterized by a multi -use trail and residential development to the north, by land under construction with a commercial center to the south, by a City fire station to the east and by a San Bernardino County Flood Control District maintenance yard to the west. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg68 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Issues and SupportingInformation Sources: Potentially Significant Wth Mitigation Than Significant Na Impact Incorporated Impact im act non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is located west of Day Creek Boulevard at the terminus of Firehouse Court and is characterized by a multi -use trail and residential development to the north, by land under construction with a commercial center to the south, by a City fire station to the east and by a San Bernardino County Flood Control District maintenance yard to the west. The nearest agricultural use, Jdseph Filippi Winery and Vineyards, is less than .5 miles to the east of the project site. The project site does not border this agricultural use and the proposed affordable senior apartment units will not negatively impact the operation of this agricultural use. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (✓) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () (✓) () ( ) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (✓) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As discussed in subsection b, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health -based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (Oa), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less Rev 9-16 E1—E5Pg69 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant wtn Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Inconiorated Impact Im act than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PMto and PM2.$) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include) motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMto), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non -attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non -Attainment Status for Ozone, PMto and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality Impact Analysis was prepared by Urban Crossroads (September 30, 2016) that utilizes CaIEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. "Mame3d:] E1—E5 Pg70 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00814 Page 8 Less Than Sign Ent Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially significant its Mit gatmn Than sigrriecan, xe Im ad Inco oraied Im ad Im ad Short Term (Construction): Project Emissions and Impacts The project proposes the development of 140 affordable senior apartments on 4 acres of land. The project site is currently undeveloped. The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. Summary of Peak Construction Emissions (Emissions Summary of Overall Construction with Best Available Control Measures) TABLE 3-4: MAXIMUM DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY Year Emissions (poundsperdayi VOC ,NOx CO sox PM10 PMLS 2017 4.38 45.49 33.35 0.05 7.55 4'.92 2018 3.42 27.34 27.53 0.05 3.13 1.94 2019 61.74 24.58 26.38 0.05 2.91 1.72 Maximum Daily Emissions 62.74 45.49 _ 33.35 0.05 7.55 4.92' SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 .100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Construction activities associated with the project will result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NOx, SOx, PMm and PM2.5 and are expected from the following construction activities: demolition, grading (including soil import), building construction, painting (architectural coatings) paving (curb, gutter, flatwork, and parking lot), and construction worker commuting. Localized Significance Summary (Construction Emissions with Best Available Control Measures) TABLE 3-6: LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE SUMMARY CONSTRUCTION on -Site site Preparation ..Emissions Emissions (pounds per day) NO. CO PMm PMu Maximum Daily Emissions 45.61. 31.90 736 4.86 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 237 1,873 13 a Threshold: Exceeded? NO: NO NO NO On -Site Grading Emissions Emissions (pounds perday) NO,.. CO PMm PM23 Maximum Daily Emissions 28.92 19.S7 4.17 2.90 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 237 1,873 13 8 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Rev 9-16 Ell —ES Pg71 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incur orated Impact Im act Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on -site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions; however, as shown in the tables above, the amount will not exceed any threshold of significance. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut -and -fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project -by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCS and are part of the 03 precursors. Based on the_ proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 61.74 Ibs of VOC per day (from table 3-4 above) (combined for all construction sources) during construction. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 Ibs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on -site and existing off -site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following Best Available Control Measures (BACM) identified in the Air Quality Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads; September 30, 2016) as mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less -than -significant: Rev 9-16 Ell—E5Pg72 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact incorporated IMP." Im act 1) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts: Short -Term Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on -site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on -going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.s and PMIo) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less -than -significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short-term air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg73 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information S PP g Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Inco orated Impact Impact conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. 10) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 11) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 12) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Rev 9-16 E1—E5Pg74 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant wh Mitigation ,Then Significant No Impact Incor orated Im act Impact Project Long Term (Operational) Emissions and Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project -related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on -site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project. Summary of Peak Operational Emissions TABLE 3.5: MAXIMUM DAILY OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS SUMMARY (1 OF 2) Operational Activities -Summer Scenario Emissions (pounds per day) VOC NO. CO SO. PMm PMzs Area Source 4.67 0.13 11.63 0.00 0.25 0.25 Energy Source 0.05 0.41 0.17 0.00 0.03 0.03 Mobile 1.60 4.98 18.87 0.05 3.67 1.00 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 6.32 5.52 30.67 0.05 3.95 1.28 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 1 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO I NO NO NO NO TABLE 3-5: MAXIMUM DAILY OPERATIONAL EM15510NS SUMMARY (2 OF 2) Operational Activities -Winter Scenario Emissfons (pounds per day) VOC NO. CO so, PMso PM" Area Source 4.67 0.13 11.63 6.10E-04 0.25 0.25 Energy Source 0.05 0.41 0.17 2.62E-03 0.03 0.03 Mobile 1.54 5.19 17.58 0.05 3.57 1.00 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 6.26 5.73 29.38 0.05 3.85 1.28 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 1 550 150 1 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Localized Signifiance - Long Term Operational Activity: The proposed project involves the construction and operation of 140 affordable senior apartment units. According to SCAQMD LST methodology, LST's would apply to the operational phase of a proposed project, if the project includes stationary sources, or attracts mobile sources that may spend long periods queuing and idling at the site (e.g., transfer facilities and warehouse buildings). The propsed project does not include such uses, and thus, due to Rev 9-16 E1-ES Pg75 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Sfgnifi ant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incoritcrated Impact Im act the lack of significant stationary source emissions, no long-term localized significance threshold analysis is needed. Cumulative Impacts (Long Term/Operational Emissions) The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the potential impacts to air quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, continued development would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, all developments would be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a less -than -significant level. This City-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 13) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 15) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 16) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 19) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 20) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 21) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg76 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially ith Than significant Mitigation SlgnNcant No Impact I Im act Im act a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR, which are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is adjacent to the Day Creek Fire Station #173 and within 1/4 mile of single family residences. The Methodology explicitly states that it is possible that a project may have receptors closer than 25 meters. Projects with boundaries located closer than 25 meters to the nearest receptor should use the LSTs for receptors located at 25 meters. Therefore, LSTs for receptors located at 25 meters were utilized in the Air Quality Study (Urban Crossroads; September 30, 2016). As the project is less than 4 acres, the project was modeled after SCAQMD's Summary of a Four Acre Site. As shown in Table 3-6 (Localized Significance Summary Construction), the project does not exceed SCAQMD Localized Thresholds. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less -than -significant levels. 22) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational odors (Long-term) are not typically associated with the type of use. Odors from the proposed affordable senior rental housing use would most likely be from activities such as the cooking of food and the disposal of refuse, however, these odors would be minimal and not considered to be significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg77 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially significant ith Ivlulga6an Than significant No Impact Inver oraletl Im act Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () (✓) () ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) (✓) () ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) () () (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with residential and commercial uses. The site has been previously disrupted during the construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources. A Biological Resources Assessment Survey was conducted on the project site by LSA (October 27, 2016). The assessment found that the study area is highly disturbed and the total vegetation cover is approximately 60 percent. The site, historically, was located within a much larger area of Riversidean Alluvial fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS). However, over time the RAFSS habitat on the site degraded into two primary vegetation communities due to disturbances related to surrounding development, isolation from larger blocks of RAFSS habitat, and the lack of active soil transport on the site. Presently, the vegetation on site is dominated by a dense monotypic stand of hairy yerba santa at the southwest portion of the study area, while the remainder of the site is primarily bare ground sparsely vegetated by California buckwheat scrub interspersed with California sagebrush, shortpod mustard, and telegraph weed. Other plants observed on site include scalebroom, chamise, mountain mahogany, Mexican elderberry, wedgeleaf ceanothus Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg78 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant Wt,, Mitigation Than igni cant SO!". No Im act Incor orated Im act Im act and deer week. A mature Canyon live oak tree exists on site, just west of the terminus of Firehouse Court. No drainage features, ponded areas, wetlands, or riparian habitat subject to jurisdiction by the CDFW, USACW and/or RWQCB were found within the project site. Neither a Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 and 404 permits nor a CDFW streambed alteration agreement is necessary. The project site is considered unsuitable for the California gnatcatcher, as the site is only 4 acres in size and isolated by surrounding development, and because vegetation on site is highly disturbed and monotypic. The project site is also considered unsuitable habitat for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR), which inhabits alluvial fan sage scrub habitats with gravelly and sandy soils of alluvial fans, braded river channels and active channels and terraces. Although alluvial fan scrub is present, it is disturbed by surrounding development and is isolated, there is no longer active soil transport on the site. Therefore, the site is not considered suitable habitat for the SBKR. In addition, no small mammal burrows were observed on site and the project does not occur within SBKR designated critical habitat, which occurs approximately 1.5 miles to the north of the project site and across State Route 210. A suitability survey was conducted for burrowing owls. The project site was determined to not contain suitable habitat for burrowing owls due to tall vegetation present on site and absence of potential nesting sites as described above. No burrowing owls or burrowing owl sites were observed during the habitat assessment survey. A burrowing owl survey is being required prior to ground clearing activities to assure that burrowing owls have not occupied the project site during the intervening time between the submitted study and ground clearing activities. The Biological Resources Assessment Survey (LSA; October 27, 2016) concludes that based on the disturbed habitat conditions, the project is not anticipated to result in any impacts to federally or state listed endangered or threatened species or to any non -listed special status species. However, a pre -construction nesting bird survey should be performed 3 days prior to ground moving actives. With the following mitigation measures, any impacts to sensitive species will be less than significant: 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 2) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Rev 9-16 E1—E5Pg79 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s9ma�Ioi myth" s nhan No Im act incorporated Impact Im act Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 3 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre -construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre - construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 3 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife 'biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may,resume. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on -site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. c) No wetland habitat is present on -site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There is a large specimen Canyon live oak tree located at the southeast corner of the site which was given a Historic Landmark Designation by the Historic Preservation Commission on October 21, 1987. The health of this tree has since declined to a point where the applicant's arborist (Jim Borer, October 10, 2016) and the City's on -staff arborist (Dean Rodia) have concluded that the tree cannot be preserved. Removal of the Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg80 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information S pP g Sources: Potentially Significant With With Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act tree requires approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2016-00966) by the Historic Preservation Commission, and a General Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00964) to modify General Plan Figure LU-8 to remove the tree from a map showing the location of all the historic resources in the City and a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2016-00965). The applicant proposes planting a 70-inch box size Canyon live oak on the site to the west of the existing tree. With the planting of the proposed replacement Canyon live oak tree, the project will be in conformance with the tree preservation ordinance and the impact to the environment will be less than significant with the incorporation of the following mitigation measure: 3) A 70-inch box size Canyon live oak shall be planted on the project site to the west of the existing Canyon live oak tree to be removed. Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (✓) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (✓) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? e) Directly or indirectly affect a Native American tribal () (✓) () ( ) cultural resource: Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). A Cultural Resources Assessment was performed on the site (LSA; October 2016). The study reviewed the cultural resources records and literature, aerial photographs and historic maps for a 1-mile radius surrounding the project site. The study also included an intensive field survey of the project site. The study concluded that no previously undocumented resources were identified within the project area and no other cultural resources were identified during the field survey. No monitoring or future cultural resource studies are recommended. The study does recommend that in the event that previously undocumented archaeological resources are identified during earthmovind activities, further work in the area should be halted until a professional archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the finding can be determined. With the mitigation measure included under b) below, any impacts on historic resources will be less than significant. Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg81 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant wan Mitigalian Than Significant No Im act Inccrporated Impact Im act b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere -of - Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following, mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or Rev 9-16 E1—E5Pg82 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant Wlh Mitigation Than Significant No Im act incorporated Im act Im ect preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by the construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on -site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on -site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) In conformance with California State Bill (SB) 18, on November 9, 2016 staff sent a Tribal Consultation Request of the proposed project to a list of tribal communities provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. A letter dated December 5, 2016, was received by staff from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation requesting that a certified Native American Monitor be on site during any and all ground disturbances. Staff also sent out a Tribal Consultation request in conformance with California Assembly Bill (AB) 52 on February 23, 2017, of the proposed project to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, the San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. The City has not been contacted to date in regards to the (AB) 52 notification letter. With the following mitigation measure, impacts to the cultural resources will be less than significant. 3) A Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation certified Native American Monitor shall be onsite during any and all ground disturbances. Rev 9-16 El —ES Pg83 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Im act 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (✓) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including () () () (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (✓) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 2 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3.5 miles north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 14 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 16 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less -than -significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on -site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and Creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg84 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wth Than Significant Mitigation SlgniOwnt No Impact Inver crated Im act Im act control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off - site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMio emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce Pli emissions. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on -site consist of Tujunga loamy soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated.. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on -site consist of Tujunga loamy soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils typically have slow to very slow runoff and have a slight hazard of water erosion. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project, a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or () (✓) () ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation () () (✓) ( ) adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg85 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act Comments: a) Regulations and Significance — The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act (92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas (GHG) emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines 6 key GHGs (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)). The combined emissions of these well -mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in -State and out -of -State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PM,o, PM2.e, and SO2 Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg86 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pctentially win Than Significant Mitigation Significant No I... ct Incorporated Im act Im act which are monitored at the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and S02 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PMto, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Proiect Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions. However, a screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is based upon South Coast Air Quality Management District staffs proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary sources emissions for non -industrial projects, as described in the SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis by Urban Crossroad dated September 30, 2016, total project related emissions would be 980.70 MTCO2eq/year, as shown in the following table: TABLE 3-1: TOTAL PROJECT GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (ANNUAL) Emission Source Emissions (metric tons per year) CO2 CH4 NZO Total CO2E Annual construction -related emissions amortized over 30 years 25.2 4.39E-03 25.29 Area 35.98 0.00 6.20E-04 36.23 Energy 209.56 9.09E-03 3.13E=03 210.72 Mobile Sources 627.44 0.02 0 627.89 Waste 13.07 0.77 0 1 29.30 Water Usage 42.66 0.30 0.01 51.27 Total COTE (All Sources) 990.70 Source: CalEEMod- model output. See Appendix 3.1 for detailed model outputs. Note:Tatals obtained from CalEEMod" and maynortotal IC0%due us rounding. Tabte results include scientific notation, a is used to represent times fen raised to the powerof (which would be written m x 10'") and is followed by the value of the exponent As shown in the table, direct and indirect operational emissions associated with the project as compared to the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance of 3,000 MTCO2e per year would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. Rev 9-16 E1—E5Pg87 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Wth Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Inver oratetl Im act Im act Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions — The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel -powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off -site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil - based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cho, and N2O. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis conducted by Urban Crossroads (September 30, 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term construction impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off -site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg88 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Im act technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project involves the construction of 140 affordable senior apartment units and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emissions including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis conducted by Urban Crossroads (September 30, 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings' to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg89 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project involves the development of 140 affordable senior apartment units, which is consistent with the General Plan. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re -use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the sustainability and climate change policies of the General Plan. The.General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant, unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis conducted by Urban Crossroads (September 30, 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term, construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to GHGs from short-term construction and long-term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. Rev 9-16 E1—E5Pg90 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potenfiaoy With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Impact 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 114 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. No adverse impacts are expected. Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg91 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Petentiany Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Inccr onsted Im act Im act b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. q) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located approximately 1.3 miles from the nearest existing or proposed school, Carleton P. Lightfoot Elementary School. No impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 8.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path and is not within the Airspace Protection Area according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. Development. No impact is anticipated. There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 and 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every 3,years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind -driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg92 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 30 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information S PP g Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Inca orated Impact Im act 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (✓) () ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () (✓) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Rev 9-16 El—E5 Pg93 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 31 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pelantiaiiy wth Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Im ac[ Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off -site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP exhibit, prepared by Modole and Associates, Inc. (February 21, 2017), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on -site drainage system. BMPs include 'both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg94 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 32 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wm Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act incorporated Impact Im acC program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to. prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational: 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring'provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will :increase water needs butwill not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this 'increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg95 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 33 Less Than Significant Less Issues and SupportingInformation Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Signif,.nt No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off -site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off -site. No impacts are anticipated. Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a), less than significant impacts are anticipated. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Modole and Associates, Inc. (February 21, 2017) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5.] No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete -lined channels, and underground storm drains as Rev 9-16 El—E5Pg96 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 34 Less Than Signifmant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant wth Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5 No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non -significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located west of Day Creek Boulevard at the terminus of Firehouse Court and is characterized by a multi -use trail and residential development to the north, by land under construction with a commercial center to the south, by a City fire station to the east and by a San Bernardino County Flood Control District maintenance yard to the west. This project will be of similar design and size the City fire station to the east and the commercial center under construction to the south. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Low Medium (LM) District. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The project is within the Victoria Community Planned Community which includes a provision that permits an increase in the permitted density by up to 2 density ranges (in this case to either Medium (M) or Medium High (MH) District). The Victoria Community Planned Community also includes a provision to encourage affordable housing by awarding affordable developments with 1 additional unit above the density range for each affordable unit provided. The project is 100 percent affordable and is thus eligible to have a density of up to 48 dwelling units per acres. The proposed density is 35 dwelling units per acre. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is 04WOIIdy El—E5Pg97 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan (See full discussion and mitigation measures under Biological Impacts). 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (✓) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) () () (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) () () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build -out. A noise Impact Analysis was prepared for the project by Urban Crossroads (October 20, 2016). The report includes an on and off -site traffic noise analysis, exterior and interior noise analysis and construction noise and vibration analysis. Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg98 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 36 Less Than Slgnirsant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially slgniGcanl itn Mitigation man Signiricanl No Im act Incor oratetl Im act Im act The off -site traffic noise analysis found that the project would increase traffic on the nearest intersections by less than 50 peak hour trips. As a doubling of traffic volumes would be required to generate a 3 dBA increase in noise levels, the project will have a less than significant impact without mitigation. The on -site traffic noise analysis found that that vehicle noise from Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road was the principal source of community noise that will impact the project site. The noise analysis shows that the project will satisfy the City's maximum day and nighttime exterior allowable noise levels without mitigation. The interior noise level analysis found that the units facing Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard will require a noise reduction of up to 12.9 dBA and a windows closed condition, requiring a means of mechanical ventilation. In order to meet the City's 45 dBA interior noise standard, the project will need to incorporate a number of noise mitigation measures which are outlined below. The construction noise and vibration analysis found that the unmitigated daytime construction activities would satisfy the City's 65 dBA maximum allowable noise level during normal construction times and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. The vibration impacts due to project construction represent temporary perceptible vibration levels which may cause annoyance in residential areas, however, they do not represent levels capable of causing building damage to nearby residential homes. Further, the impacts at the site of the closest sensitive receivers are unlikely to be sustained during the entire construction period, but will occur rather only during the time that heavy construction equipment is operating adjacent to the project perimeter. Construction at the project site will be restricted to daytime hours consistent with City requirements, thereby eliminating potential vibration impacts during sensitive night time hours. The analysis provides several mitigation measures that are included below to further reduce any potential impacts. The project will have a less than significant impact with the mitigation measures outline below. Exterior.' 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and 'how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) During all project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with property operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers" standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptor nearest the project site. 3) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. Rev 9-16 El—E5 Pg99 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 37 Less Than significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: a Significant PIm With Mitigation Than iNo l act nw orated Impact Impact Interior. 4) All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well fitted, well weather-stripped assemblies and shall have a minimum sound transmission class (STC) rating of 27. 5) All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least one and three -fourths inch thick. 6) At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtight seal. 7) Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well fitted or caulked plywood of at least one inch thick. Ceilings shall be well fitted, fully sealed gypsum board of a least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. 8) Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use and sill receive circulated air. A forced air circulation system (e.g. air conditioning) or active ventilation system shall be proved which satisfies the requirement of the Uniform Building Code. 9) Prior to approval of building permits, a letter from an acoustic engineer shall be submitted verifying conformance to the interior noise mitigation measures. 10) Prior to final approval by the Planning, Department, an acoustic engineer shall be submitted verifying implementation of the interior mitigation measures. b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. With the exterior mitigation measures outlined above, the construction related vibration will be less than significant. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on -site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 11) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 12) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg100 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 38 Less Than Sign'(cant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant win Mitigation Than Significant No Im acl Incor oraletl Im acl Im act specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the. Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 13) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on -site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 14) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 8.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will include the construction of 140 senior apartments. Although the project will increase the population growth in the area there will be a less than significant impact as the project is consistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation. The density was analyzed as Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg101 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 39 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant N. Im act Incorporated Impact Im act part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. No significant impacts are anticipated. b) Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. c) Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () (✓) b) Police protection? () () () (✓) c) Schools? () () () (✓) d) Parks? () () () (✓) e) Other public facilities? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The site, located at the north west corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road, would be served by Day Creek Fire Station Number 173, which is located directly adjacent to the project site at 12270 Firehouse Court. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) The increase in residential units may lead to an increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Ellena Park, is located 1.2 miles from the project site at 7139 Kenyon Way. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to Rev 9-16 E1—E5Pg102 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 40 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Signifcant No Impact Incorporated Im act Im act construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. Additionally, the closest public library, the Paul A. Biane Library, recently completed a second floor addition that added 13,500 square feet of specialized programming space. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or () () () (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Ellena Park, is located 1.2 miles from the project site at 7139 Kenyon Way. The project is for the development of 140 affordable senior housing units. The project site is zoned Low Medium (LM) District, which is a residential zoning district. The General Plan contemplated the development of residential units at the proposed density on the project site. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. Rev 9-16 El—E5 Pg103 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 41 Less Than Slgnifiwnl Loss Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Signiricanl wm Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Inco crated Impact Impact 16. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy () () () (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management () ( ) () (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) () () (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) () () (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) A Trip Generation Evaluation (Urban Crossroads; September 26, 2016) was submitted for the project. The trip generation rates used for the evaluation were based on information collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), as provided by their Trip Generation manual (9th Edition, 2012). The ITE Senior Housing land use was utilized to. determine trip generation rates and peak hour trip generation. The proposed project is anticipated to generate a net total of approximately 482 trips per day with 28 AM peak hour trips and 35 PM peak hour trips. Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg104 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 42 Less Than Significant Less Issues and, Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act incorporated Impact Im act TABLE 1: PROPOSED PROJECTTRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Land Use RE LU AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Cade Unks=I In I Out Total I In I Out Total Daily Pro ect Trip Generation Rates' Senior Housing - Attached 252 i DU 0.07 1 0.13 0.20 0.14 0.11 0.25 3.44 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Quantity Units' I In I out I Total In Daily Project Trip Generation Summary Senior Housing -Attached 140 DU 10 18 1 28 Tn 15 35 1 482 Tin t - ____ .__. .._ _�_._.._.. n„�,,,,,,n, manu•� rvmm CCltlon lZ0121• DU=Dwelling units The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not maintain their own traffic study guidelines and instead defers to the County of San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) traffic study guidelines. The County of San Bernardino CMP requires a traffic study be prepared if a project generates 250 two-way peak hour trips and that expects to add at least 50 peak our trips to a key intersection. As such, no additional analysis is required based on the CMP guidelines, as the project is anticipated to generate fewer than 50 peak hour trips. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) The County of San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) estimates that each senior housing unit will generate 35 two-way peak hour trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 8.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg105 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 43 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information S pp g Sources: Potentially Significant Win Mitigation Than Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Im act d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. The design of the project includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction including bicycle parking, direct access to the Pacific Electric multi -use trail, sidewalk access to adjacent commercial centers and a bus stop. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition .to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet Rev 9-16 El—E5 Pg106 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 44 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pmen ally wm man Signilwnt Mitigalian Signifcanl No Im ad Inw crated Impact Im act the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland. The current daily water usage in the CVWD service area is approximately 41.7 million gallons per day (mgd). Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed. Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent. Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for projects that exceed the following sizes: 1) residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet; 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet; 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms; 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet; 6) mixed use project including one or more of the projects specified above; 7) any other project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or greater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit project; and 8) any project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system. Under SB 221, a Water Supply Assessment is required when: 1) A project that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) a project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system; 'and 3) applies to development agreements that Include such subdivision. The City has determined that the proposed project does not meet one of the requirements; therefore, a Water Supply Assessment is not required. As discussed, the project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The.proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg107 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 45 Less Than Slgnifcan, Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWth Than Mitigation Signifcnt No nco orated Im act Im act g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. A Biological Resources Assessment was conducted on the project site by LSA on October 27, 2016. The Biological Resources Assessment finds that the project site is highly disturbed and vegetated by hairy yerba santa, poor quality California buckwheat scrub, ruderal vegetation, and a mature Canyon live oak tree in declining health. Impacts to these vegetation communities is are not considered significant. Indirect impacts to surrounding areas as a result of the project may include, but are not limited to, increased dust, noise, lighting, traffic and storm water runoff. Because of the small scale of the project, substantial indirect impacts are not anticipated. The project site is currently surrounded by existing development. Therefore, significant cumulative effects to biological resources as a result of the proposed project are not anticipated. Based on the disturbed habitat conditions, the project is not anticipated to result in any impact to federally or sate listed as endangered or threatened species or to any non -listed special status species. To assure that the burrowing owl and nesting birds have not inhabited the site after the Biological Resources Assessment, a mitigation measure has been added to the Biological Resources. (Section 4) of this study. b) If the proposed project were approved, the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Rev 9-16 El—E5 Pg108 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 46 Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build -out in the City and Sphere -of -Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed -use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction -related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less -than -significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Victoria Planned Community EIR (Certified May 20, 1981) Technical Appendences (A) Air Quality Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads; September 30, 2016) (B) Arborist Report (Jim Borer; October 10, 2016) (C) Biological Resources Assessment (LSA; October 27, 2016) (D) Cultural Resources Assessment (LSA, October 2016) (E) Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Urban Crossroads; September 30, 2016) Rev 9-16 El—E5 Pg109 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 47 (F) Noise Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads; October 20, 2016) (G) Trip Generation Evaluation (Urban Crossroads; September 26, 2016) Rev 9-16 E1—E5 Pg110 Initial Study for DRC2016-00814 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 48 I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearl;�<;_nificant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature �! �r�� Date: a !;6 / Print Name and Title: Fk l t`)i2Jn,f — Rev 9-16 V—*PA(55aJc us Af 1 1' E1—E5Pg111 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2016-00814 Applicant: National Community Renaissance Initial Study Prepared by: Tabe van der Zwaag Date: March 9, 2017 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non -Compliance Section3` AgfQuahty, _ - 1) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed PD C Review of Plans A/C 214 unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance R any grading permits, PD/BO C Review of Plans C 2 the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low -emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the Page 1 of 16 — Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non -Compliance project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize BO C Review of Plans A/C 4 electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be _ applied either by hand or high -volume, low pressure spray 10) All construction equipment shall comply with SO C Review of Plans A/C 214 SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 roads. • Phase grading to prevent the BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule BO C During Construction A 4 Page 2 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high BO C During Construction A 4 winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD — Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard BO C During Construction A 4 ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 11) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During Construction A 4 soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 12) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by BO C During Construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 13) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all BO C During Construction A 4 entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy BO C During Construction A 4 vehicles and shuttle services. 15) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during BO C During Construction A 4 off-peak hours. 16) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and BO C During A 4 reduce thermal load with automated time Construction clocks or occupant sensors. 17) Landscape with native and/or drought- BO C During A 4 resistant species to reduce water Construction consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. Page 3 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road BO C During Construction A 4 materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 19) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous BO C During Construction A 4 Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 20) All residential and commercial structures shall BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low- polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 21) All residential and commercial structures shall BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 22) All new development in the City of Rancho BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions Of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Section 4 �Biologlcal Resources �� '` i 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation PD C Review of Report A/D 3/4 or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the Page 4 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date/Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction' area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 2) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in pD C Review of Report A/D 3/4 conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California — Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 3 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: • Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre - construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre - construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre - Page 5 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. I Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date/initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 3 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. • During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. • During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Page 6 of 16 m Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance 3) A 70-inch box size Canyon live oak shall be PD C Plan Check A/C 3/4 planted on the project site to the west of the existing Canyon live oak tree to be removed. �Sect�onh5i Cultural Resources � � � `;, + �- - 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect PD/BO C Review of Report A/D 3/4 undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to PD/BO C Review of Report A/D 314 require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of Report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with PD B/C Review of report A/D 2/4 Section 21083.2 Archeological and plans during resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse construction project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources PD C Review of Report A/D 3/4 management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed Page 7 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or PD B Review of Report A/D 4 animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained PD B Review of Report A/D 4 and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area BO B/C Review of Report A/D 4 being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all PD D Review of Report D 3 recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of PD D Review of Report D 3 Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. 3) A Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh PD B Review of Report A/D 4 Page 8 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance Nation certified Native American Monitor shall be onsite during any and all ground disturbances. Section 6""Geology and Soils, .. 1) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During Construction A 4 soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re- planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept BO C During Construction A 4 according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMio emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when BO C During Construction A 4 wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMio emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by BO C During Construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Section=7`Greenhouse=Gas Emissions n. '. Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that BO C During Construction A 4 assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select BO C During Construction A 4 construction equipment based on low - emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan Page 9 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more BO C During Construction A 4 than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be BO C During Construction A 4 utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to BO C During Construction A 4 interfere withpeak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be BO C During Construction A 4 supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 7) Construction and Building materials shall be BO A During Construction C 2 produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound VOC materials. S) Design all buildings to exceed California BO C During Construction A 4 Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems . • Install light colored "cool' roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes Page 10 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequent Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation BO A During Construction C 2 strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and CE A Review of Plans C 2 demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Section9* �Hydrologyfiand VVaterQuality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 214 permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Page 11 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, BO B/C/D/ Review of Plans A/C 2/4 included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off - site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such SO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 214 as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational Page 12 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequent Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (name/date) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a PD/BO B Review of Plans C/A 4 construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) During all project site construction, the PD/BO B Review of Plans C/A 14 Page 13 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non -Compliance construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with property operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers" standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptor nearest the project site. 3) The construction contractor shall locate PD/BO B Review of Plans CIA 4 equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. Interior 4) All windows and sliding glass doors shall be PD C During Construction A 2 well fitted, well weather-stripped assemblies and shall have a minimum sound transmission class (STC) rating of27. 5) All exterior doors shall be well weather- PD C During Construction A 2 stripped solid core assemblies at least one and three -fourths inch thick. 6) At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, PD C During Construction A 2 ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtight seal. 7) Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be PD C During Construction A 2 well fitted or caulked plywood of at least one inch thick. Ceilings shall be well fitted, fully sealed gypsum board of a least a rating of R- 19 shall be used in the attic space. . 8) Arrangements for any habitable room shall be PD C During Construction A 2 such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use and sill receive circulated air. A forced air circulation system (e.g. air conditioning) or active ventilation system shall be proved which satisfies the requirement of the Uniform Building Code. Page 14 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance 9) Prior to approval of building permits, a letter PD C During Construction A 2 from an acoustic engineer shall be submitted verifying conformance to the interior noise mitigation measures. 10) Prior to final approval by the Planning PD C During Construction A 2 Department, an acoustic engineer shall be submitted verifying implementation of the interior mitigation measures. 11) Construction or grading shall not take place BO C During Construction A 4 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 12) Construction or grading noise levels shall not BO C During Construction A 4 exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction' activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 13) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed PD C During Construction A 2 as early as possible in the first phase. 14) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place PO/BO C During Construction A 417 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation Page 15 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non -Compliance plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Res C dCt gqjjk�ffii6c �q_y J_ Sanctions ,-..� CDD - Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development A - On -site Inspection I -Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD - Planning Director or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP 2 7-Citation Page 16 of 16 RESOLUTION NO. 17-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00964, A REQUEST TO MODIFY GENERAL PLAN FIGURE LU-8 RELATED TO THE REMOVAL OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCE DESIGNATION OF AN ON -SITE TREE RELATED TO THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 140-UNIT AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ON 4 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE LOW -MEDIUM (LM) DISTRICT (4 — 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF FIREHOUSE COURT AND WEST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1089-031-36. A. Recitals. 1. National Community Renaissance of California filed an application for the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of May 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the terminus of Fire House Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard in the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and b. To the west of the project site is a maintenance yard operated by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District within the Low Medium (LM) District and Flood Control/Utility Corridor (FC/UC) District of the Victoria Community Plan; to the east is Day Creek Fire Station #173, within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan ; to the north is the Pacific Electric trail and single-family residences within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and, to the south is land that is under construction with a new commercial center (Day Creek Village) within the Village Commercial (VC) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and El—E5 Pg128 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-29 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00964 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA. MAY 10, 2017 Page 2 C. The applicant is requesting to develop a 140-unit affordable rental senior housing project on 4 acres of land; and d. A large specimen Canyon Live Oak tree is located at the southeast corner of the site that was given a Historic Landmark Designation by the Historic Preservation Commission on October 21,1987. The health of this tree has since declined to a point where the applicant's arborist and the City's on -staff arborist have concluded that the tree cannot be preserved. Removal of the tree requires approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2016-00966) by the Historic Preservation Commission, a General Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00964) to modify General Plan Figure LU-8 to remove the tree from a map illustrating the location of all the historic resources in the City and a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2016-00965); and e. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. The proposed General Plan Amendment will amend General Plan Figure LU-8 (Historic Resources) to remove a Canyon Live Oak as a Historic Resource. The subject tree was designated a Historic Landmark on October 21,1987. The condition of the tree has since declined to a point where it cannot be preserved; and f. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan Land Use Element. The subject General Plan Amendment is to amend General Plan Figure LU-8 (Historic Resources) to remove a Canyon Live Oak as a Historic Resource and will not impact the goals and objectives of the General Plan. g. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The amendment is to remove a tree from General Plan Figure LU-8 (Historic Resources) that was given Historic Landmark Designation due to decline of the tree. The subject tree will be replaced with a large specimen tree of the same species in close proximity to the location of the existing tree. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size and compatibility with the existing land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed amendment will not change the land use designation of the project site. The subject General Plan Amendment will amend General Plan Figure LU-8 (Historic Resources) to remove a Canyon Live Oak as a Historic Resource due to the declining health of the tree. b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The amendment will not have significant impact on the environment as it is to amend General Plan Figure LU-8 (Historic Resources) to remove a Canyon Live Oak as a Historic Resource due to the declining health of the tree. A replacement tree of the same species will be planted on the project site to replace the removed tree. C. The proposed amendment meets the goals and policies of the General Plan. The amendment will not impact the goals and policies of the General Plan as it is to amend General Plan E1—E5 Pg129 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-29 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00964 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA. MAY 10, 2017 Page 3 Figure LU-8 (Historic Resources) to remove a Canyon Live Oak as a Historic Resource due to the decline of the tree. A replacement tree of the same species will be planted on the project site to replace the removed tree. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to approving the requested General Plan Amendment. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records forthe Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the General Plan Amendment application as shown in Attachment "A" subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) Approval is for General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, to amend General Plan Figure LU-8, to remove the subject Canyon Live Oak tree from this figure due to the condition of the tree related to the development of a 140 unit affordable senior housing project for a site El—E5 Pg130 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-29 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00964 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA. MAY 10, 2017 Page 4 located the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard. APN: 1089-031-36. 2) Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964 is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Design Review DRC2016- 00814 and City Council approval of Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-0015 and Historic Preservation Commission approval of Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966. 3) Approval is contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA go Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: E1—E5 Pg131 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-29 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00964 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA. MAY 10, 2017 Page 5 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: El —ES Pg132 m D D n m J RANCHO CAMONueA YwYMYmLfKlM39 LA RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENtRAL PLAN Existing .,AN H4NMAA[OINU HA TI fiNA.. fQRk" -- P HeoEgHallD NlfloK $!fi • R�tlra GLdmpyp loullbfYruyYf e RYMrpf mYgePyrh IXMf.4lnrlriMm( r •. cwro.YY Ragta cY:lsr.. waunrr.woNY. CaWru Frrnraww.rcar M.e: R.\I ER, • HwvwRCYYerdnum�rw..� C!Y Avmr.� HetMC R..p RaWn R". ..... fmlw mrY:.aa MdYY651 •.... Pmt[l4p¢rLMq r:mLLv ••emu 4YfYay. ipeY6SaH. fe kvWY 1^v. Ri+lWfm Nowerir 3rfa f e.Esrwyl Oe°e WY' P.osE ICwbwe �. dtrn:neY YYere:l BeM Lnyn �b h..Yvy — Syered YAUYc py� I IlryyY R.. RYY l MHR ^Anel:eYrlf•I YJ m'Isr:mCNr.bnr✓YOIEu('mm >ap Retrs fursvgA �,w m&a+YreCvhNeay.Ag FAl Ure LL 1-8: Historic Resources W-Un m At -mom aA,ll/a, Cam•RYMy Osvpt anENhtRA[Minas RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Proposed ❑eaponren n�,Pn: sa • FeM+o Cutanugnluult.vaYauuas • RSW+o fuoiron pm•olWalpGal l+Mef1 �, • Clbru Hepnn • ihlnaY lYbI1(allNryah4 ca•m.. Polrv•u,•mw•a+ei R—N,1 • N1LndRe+fibeflbec Rycey Cl, A\itl\t.t nn,atc Ranepo,u•oP Rouges ..... cmiarmt�aR+meoul ..... a.at. rxrn R•Wp ca+m ••••. av,ss+upw•es.0 re Fmrr rtv+u Ea.n•¢m wm+ern sea Aare R•Yay � ....: R•a•Lw+eRmf,C•Wn. Pa•dHmc�,x•�••n e•m v+wn•w+wruranm�er, •+•rm:,ae:aA�•a. >yrm aamea�my.:rc+a•y,aa,.r ,:•.wa�>a ins Fia-wrc U L& Historic Resources L lm RESOLUTION NO. 17-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT DRC2017-00156, A REQUEST FOR A DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, INCLUDING DEVIATING FROM CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 140-UNIT AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ON 4 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE LOW -MEDIUM (LM) DISTRICT (4 — 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF FIREHOUSE COURT AND WEST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1089-031-36. A. Recitals. 1. National Community Renaissance of California filed an application for the approval of Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Density Bonus Agreement request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of May 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the terminus of Fire House Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard in the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and b. To the west of the project site is a maintenance yard operated by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District within the Low Medium (LM) District and Flood Control/Utility Corridor (FC/UC) District of the Victoria Community Plan; to the east is Day Creek Fire Station #173, within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; to the north is the Pacific Electric trail and single-family residences within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria E1—E5 Pg135 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-30 DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT DRC2017-00156 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA. MAY 10, 2017 Page 2 Community Plan; and, to the south is land that is under construction with a new commercial center (Day Creek Village) within the Village Commercial (VC) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and C. The land use and zoning designation of the project site is Low -Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan, which permits 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The Victoria Community Plan includes a provision permitting the zoning designation to be increased by up to 2 density ranges in order to provide plan flexibility. The project site can thus be increased in density from Low -Medium (LM) District to either Medium (M) District (8 — 14 dwelling units per acre) or Medium -High (MH) District (14 — 24 dwelling units per acre). The Victoria Community Plan also provides an incentive to build affordable housing, which awards property owners' one bonus unit in density for every affordable dwelling unit provided. The project will be 100 percent affordable and is thus eligible for a 100 percent increase in the permitted density level, or between 24 to 48 dwelling units per acre; and d. The applicant is requesting to develop a 140-unit affordable rentalIseniorhousing project on 4 acres of land. The proposed density is 35 dwelling units per acre. e. Development Code Chapter 17.46 (Density Bonuses, Incentives and Concessions) provides incentives for the production of affordable housing, including the opportunity to provide reductions in the related development standards. The applicant can request up to 3 concessions based on the affordability factor of the project. In this case, the applicant is requesting 2 concessions, a reduction in the required number of parking spaces and a reduction in the size of the private recreation areas (decks). Density bonuses and concessions are considered in conjunction with any necessary development entitlements for the project and approved by a Density Bonus Agreement. The designated approving authority for the Density Bonus Agreement is the City Council. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Density Bonus Agreement is consistentwith the objectives, policies, and general land uses specified in the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plans. The proposed Density Bonus Agreement furthers General Plan Goal HE-2, to provide housing opportunities that meet the needs of all economic segments of the community including very low, low and moderate income households. The proposed affordable senior housing rental units further this goal by providing seniors with affordable housing. Additionally, the Victoria Community Plan includes provisions to permit the project at the proposed residential density; and b. The proposed Density Bonus Agreement is compatible and in conformity with public convenience, general welfare, and good land use and zoning practice. The project site is well suited for the proposed affordable senior housing rental development. It is located in close proximity to public transportation, a multi -use recreational trail and multiple commercial developments, reducing the need for a personal vehicle and increasing the mobility of the senior population targeted by the development; and C. The proposed Density Bonus Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. The proposed affordable senior housing rental units related to the Density Bonus Agreement will not negatively impact the City as is in keeping with the surrounding development and will become an integral part of the community. El—E5 Pg136 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-30 DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT DRC2017-00156 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA. MAY 10, 2017 Page 3 d. The proposed Density Bonus Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values. The proposed affordable senior housing rental development is well suited for the proposed location and complies with the zoning designation and the permitted density of the project site. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidencelthat the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to approving the requested Density Bonus Agreement. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records forthe Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. This Commission hereby recommends approval of the Density Bonus Agreement attached hereto as Attachment "A" with the special conditions which follows: 1) The final draft of the Density Bonus Agreement shall be reviewed and accepted by the City Attorney prior to approval by City Council. 2) Approved is contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. E1—E5 Pg137 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-30 DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT DRC2017-00156 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA. MAY 10, 2017 Page 4 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: El—E5 Pg138 RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: City Clerk With a copy to: Day Creek Senior Housing Partners LP c/o National Community Renaissance 9421 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Chief Financial Officer APNs: 1089-031-36 iMOMMU Exempt from Recording Fees Pursuant to Government Code Section 27383 DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT DRC2017-00156 (SENIOR CITIZENS AFFORDABLE HOUSING) THIS DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is dated as of June 7, 2017 and is entered into by and between DAY CREEK SENIOR HOUSING PARTNERS LP, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (the "Developer"), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a California municipal corporation (the "City"). RECITALS A. California Government Code Section 65915(d) provides that in addition to a density bonus (not applicable here), a city may, by agreement with a developer, grant up to three incentives or concessions that the applicant requests when a developer agrees to construct housing for low income households. B. The City has implemented California Government Code Section 65915(d) by enacting Municipal Code Section 17.46.040B, which subject to certain limitations, contemplate such incentives to encourage development of affordable housing for low income households. C. Developer has requested City to consider the approval of a density bonus agreement which will grant concessions for Developer's development of the real property in City on Exhibit "A" ("Site"). The Site is located within the Victoria Planned Community. D. The Developer proposes to construct a senior housing residential project, consisting of low income units, on the Site. Said project contemplated by Developer will require two incentives/concessions from the residential development standards in the Victoria Planned Community. The Developer is not requesting a density bonus for this project. ATTACHMENT A -I- E1—E5 Pg139 E. It is the desire of City to encourage developments designed to provide affordable rental units for senior residents of the City. In furtherance of that desire, the City is hereby willing to grant concessions to Developer as provided by the terms of this Agreement, which is a so-called "density bonus agreement' contemplated and required by Municipal Code Chapter 17.46.040. F. City and Developer have entered into a Disposition, Development and Loan Agreement dated in 2016 which obligates the City to sell the Site to Developer subject to certain conditions, including the condition that a "Development Agreement' be approved by City and executed; however, Developer and City have determined that the only purpose of such condition was to provide for the affordable housing incentives described herein, and that Municipal Code Chapter 17.46 requires a so- called "density bonus agreement' under that Chapter, not a statutory development agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Definitions. In this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meaning: a. "Affordable Rents" shall mean the total charges for rent, utilities, and related services in an amount not to exceed the amount of rent permitted under California Health and Safety Code Section 50053 and Sections 6910 — 6932 of Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations. b. "Area Median Income" shall mean the median income for households in San Bernardino County, California, as published from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") in a manner consistent with the determination of median gross income under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, and as defined in Title 25, California Code of Regulations, Section 6932. In the event that such income determinations are no longer published by HUD, or are not updated for a period of at least 18 months, the City shall either use the income determinations used by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee or may use income determinations that are reasonably similar with respect to methods of calculation to those previously published by HUD. C. "City" is the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. d. "Project' is the development approved by City comprised of one hundred and forty (140) apartment units, recreational and common area facilities, parking spaces and other amenities on the Site, all as set forth more fully in the site plan for Environmental Assessment and Design Review DRC2016-00814 submitted by Developer and approved by City. The Project is subject to the conditions of approval which are not changed, altered or modified by this Agreement. e. "Qualified Tenants" shall mean households consisting of a person who is sixty- two (62) years of age or older and any qualified permanent residents under the applicable provisions of California Civil Code Section 51.3 and the federal Fair Housing Act (except to the extent the Project utilizes federal funds whose programs have differing definitions for senior projects in which case those definitions will apply), and whose annual household income does not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the Area Median Income. 2. Binding Effect of Agreement. The Developer hereby subjects the Site and development thereon to the covenants, reservations and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement in perpetuity. The City and the Developer hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be -2- 11231-ooa 1\2050037v4.doc El—E5 Pg140 binding upon the Developer's successors and assigns and successor to any interest in the Project. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the development or any portion thereof shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered and accepted subject to the covenants, reservations and restrictions expressed in this Agreement, regardless of whether such covenants, reservations and restrictions are set forth in such contract; deed or other instrument. 3. Relationship of Parties. It is understood that the contractual relationship between City and Developer is such that Developer is an independent party and is not the agent of City for any purpose whatsoever. 4. Restrictions on Rental Units; Qualified Tenants. It is expressly understood by the parties hereto that the Project has been specifically designed to meet the unique needs of senior tenants. Except for one (1) manager's unit, the apartment units in the Project shall be rented, occupied, leased or subleased to households which include at least one Qualified Tenant. 5. Rental Requirements; Affordable Rent. One hundred and thirty-nine (139) of the units in the Project, not including the one unit for a resident manager, shall be rented, leased or held available for Qualified Tenants at Affordable Rents. 6. No Conversion. During the term hereof, all residential units in the Project shall remain rental units. During the term hereof, no apartment unit in the Project shall be eligible for conversion from rental units to condominiums, townhomes or any other common interest subdivision without consent of the City Council. 7. On -site Manager. A full-time manager shall be provided on the Project site in the manager's unit. S. Submission of Materials and Annual Review. Prior to occupancy, Developer shall submit to City tenant selection procedures which shall detail the methods which Developer shall use to advertise the availability of apartments in the Project and screening mechanisms which Developer intends to use to limit the occupancy of the apartments to Qualified Tenants, including the income restrictions on some of the units as set forth in this Agreement. On or before April 15 of each year following the first leasing of any apartment (other than the manager's unit), the Developer, or its representative, shall file a certificate of continuing program compliance with the City. Each such report shall contain such information as City may require including,' but not limited to, the following: a. Rent schedules then in effect, including utility charges (if any); b. A project occupancy profile; C. A description of the physical condition and maintenance procedures for the Project, including apartment units, landscaping, walkways and recreational areas. d. The number of persons per unit; C. Tenant name; f. Initial occupancy date; -3- 1123 1 -000 1\2050037v4.doe El—E5 Pg141 g. Rent paid per month; h. Gross income per year; Percent of rent paid in relation to income; and j. Copies of all documents used by Developer to certify the tenant as a Qualified Tenant. City shall be allowed to conduct physical inspections of the Project as it shall deem necessary, provided that said inspections do not unreasonably interfere with the normal operations of the Project and reasonable notice is provided. City shall repair any damage and shall defend, indemnify and hold Developer harmless from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, costs, expenses incurred by Developer relating in any way to City's inspections and investigations. 9. Tenant Selection, Contracts and Rules and Regulations. After receipt of applications for income restricted units, Developer shall determine the eligibility of the occupancy under the terms of this Agreement. Verification of tenant income eligibility shall be based on the following information and other information if permitted by the California Tax Allocation Committee for the low income housing tax credit program: a. Income verification form from the Social Security Administration and/or the California Department of Social Services, if the applicant receives income from either or both agencies; b. Income tax return for the most recent tax year; C. TRW or similar financial search; d. Income verification from all current employers; and e. If the applicant is unemployed and has no tax return, another form of independent verification. Developer shall deliver copies thereof to City upon written request. All agreements for rental of all apartment units in the Project shall be in writing. The form of proposed rent or lease agreement shall be reviewed and approved by City prior to use. Such agreement shall include all rules and regulations governing tenancy within the Project. 10. Termination and Eviction of Tenants. A tenancy may be terminated without the termination being deemed an unlawful eviction under the following circumstances: a. The death of the sole tenant of the unit; b. By the tenant at the expiration of the term of occupancy or otherwise upon thirty (30) days' written notice; C. By abandonment of the premises by the tenant; or d. By failure of a tenant to execute or renew a lease. -4- 11231-000112050037v4.doc El—E5 Pg142 An affordable unit initially occupied by a Qualified Tenant shall be deemed occupied by a Qualified Tenant until such affordable unit is vacated, even if the tenant's household income subsequently increases to an amount that exceeds the maximum allowable income level for its initial income category so long as satisfactory actions are taken to ensure that all vacancies are filled in accordance with this Agreement until the noncompliance is corrected. Upon termination of occupancy of an affordable unit by a tenant, such affordable unit shall be deemed to be continuously occupied by a household of the same income level as the initial income level of the vacating tenant, until such affordable unit is reoccupied, at which time the income character of the affordable unit shall be determined by the income of the incoming tenant. The income of all persons residing in the affordable unit shall be considered for purposes of calculating the applicable income. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, no less than one person per bedroom shall be allowed; no more than two persons shall be permitted to occupy a one bedroom affordable unit; and no more than three persons shall be permitted to occupy a two bedroom affordable unit. Any termination of a tenancy other than those listed above in this Section shall constitute a lawful eviction only if: (i) Developer conduct it in compliance with the provisions of California law and (ii) the lease is terminated then only for material noncompliance with the terms of the applicable rental agreement after written notice and the expiration of a reasonable cure period. it. Insurance. Developer shall keep the Project and all improvements thereon insured at all times against loss or damage endorsement and such other risks, perils or coverage as Developer may determine. During the term hereof, the Project shall be insured to its full insurance replacement value. 12. Maintenance Guarantee. Developer shall comply with all City maintenance standards for the Project enacted from time to time. 13. Standards and Restriction Pertaining to Development of the Site. The following specific restrictions shall apply to the use of the Site during the term of this Agreement: a. Developer is required to obtain all necessary land use entitlements, approvals and permits for the Project. b. Only residential uses of the real property shall be permitted in the Project. 14. Development Incentives. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65915(d) and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.46.040.B., the City grants Developer the following development incentives for development of the Project: a. The amount of required private open space per dwelling unit is decreased from 150 square feet for ground floor dwelling units and 100 square feet for upper floor dwelling units to 107 square feet for ground floor dwelling units and 80 square feet for upper floor dwelling units; and b. The required number of on -site parking spaces is decreased to a minimum ratio of 0.85 parking spaces per unit, with 82 carport stalls and 37 uncovered spaces. -5- 1123 1 -000 I\20500370.doc E1—E5 Pg 143 15. Proiect Design Amenities for Senior Citizens. The Project open space, buildings and individual apartments shall be designed with physical amenities catering to the needs and desires of the senior citizen residents. The following physical amenities shall be substantially included in the Project: a. Unit sizes shall be an average of 600 square feet for 1-bedroom residential units and 890 square feet for 2-bedroom residential units; b. Elevator service shall be provided to all upper story apartments; C. All common access areas in the Project such as entryways, walkways, and hallways will be wide enough to accommodate wheelchairs; d. The Project will meet all applicable current requirements for access and design imposed by law as administered by the City building and safety department, including, but not limited to, the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 3601 et seq.), the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.), and the regulations promulgated at Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations that relate to access for persons with disabilities or handicaps; e. All units shall possess secured entryways off a common enclosed hallway; and f. The Project is designed to encourage social contact by providing at least one common room (the Project community room) and at least some common open space (the Project's fitness room, pool, outdoor fire pit lounge, courtyard and garden areas). 16. Indemnification. Developer shall defend, indemnify and hold City and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees harmless from claims, liabilities, losses, damages and costs and expenses arising from or relating to personal injuries, including death, and property damage which may arise from the activities of Developer or those of its contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on its behalf which relate to the Project. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this provision shall not apply to any such claims which arise out of, or by reason of, the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. 17. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or canceled, in whole or in part, only by mutual written consent of the parties. 18. Event of Default. Developer is in default under this Agreement upon the happening of one or more of the following events or conditions: a. If a warranty, representation or statement is made or furnished by Developer to City and is inaccurate in any material respect when it was made; b. A breach by Developer of any of the provisions or terms of this Agreement, after notice and opportunity to cure as provided in Section 19. 19. Enforcement. In the event of a default under the provisions of this Agreement by Developer, City shall give written notice to Developer, and if such violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of City within thirty (30) days after such notice is given, then City may, without further notice, declare a default under this Agreement and City may then enforce as any normal violation of the standards and provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code applicable to this Agreement. However, notwithstanding the foregoing, City may at any time apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Developer of any provision of this Agreement. -6- 1123 1 -000 1\2050037v4.doc El—E5 Pg144 20. Developer Representation Re: Priority; No Waiver of Remedies. Developer represents and warrants that this Agreement, when recorded, is senior and prior to all deeds of trust and other liens, except for liens for property taxes and assessments not yet due. City does not waive any claim of defect in performance by Developer if on periodic review City does not enforce or terminate this Agreement. Nonperformance by Developer shall not be excused because performance by Developer of the obligations herein contained would be unprofitable, difficult or expensive or because of a failure of any third party or entity, other than City. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement are available to the parties to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 21. Rights of Lenders Under this Agreement. Should Developer place or cause to be placed any encumbrance or lien on the Project, or any part thereof, the beneficiary ("Lender") of said encumbrance or lien, including, but not limited to, deeds of trust, shall have the right at any time during the term of this Agreement and the existence of said encumbrance or lien to: a. Do any act or thing required of Developer under this Agreement, and any such act or thing done or performed by Lender shall be as effective as if done by Developer itself; b. Realize on the security afforded by the encumbrance or lien by exercising foreclosure proceedings or power of sale or other remedy afforded in law or in equity or by the security document evidencing the encumbrance or lien; C. Transfer, convey or assign the title of Developer to the Project to any purchaser at any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a trust deed; and d. Acquire and succeed to the interest of Developer by virtue of any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale is conducted pursuant to a court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a trust deed. 22. Notice to Lender. If Developer shall have provided City in writing with the name of the Lender and a copy of its recorded deed of trust, then City shall give written notice of any default or breach under this Agreement by Developer to such Lender and if the default can be cured by the payment of money, City shall give Lender the opportunity after service of the notice to cure the breach or default within sixty (60) days after delivery of said notice. 23. Notices. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be provided by certified mail, return receipt requested, at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other such address as may be later specified by the parties hereto in a notice given pursuant to this Section. Developer: Day Creek Senior Housing Partners LP c/o National Community Renaissance 9421 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Chief Financial Officer City: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive -7- 11231-0001\2050037A.doc E1—E5 Pg145 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: City Manager 24. Attorneys' Fees. In any proceedings arising from the enforcement of this Agreement or because of an alleged breach or default hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and its reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during the proceeding as may be fixed within the discretion of the court. 25. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. 26. Partial Invalidity. If any provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality or enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. 27. Recordation. This Agreement shall be recorded in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino. 28. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence of every provision hereof in which time is a factor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties and shall be effective on the Effective Date set forth herein. DEVELOPER: CITY: DAY CREEK SENIOR HOUSING PARTNERS LP, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a a California nonprofit public benefit corporation municipal corporation By: Day Creek Senior Housing Partners MGP, By: LLC, a California limited liability company, its general partner By: National Community Renaissance of California, a California nonprofit corporation, its sole member/manager an Steve PonTell Chief Executive Officer L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: 0 James Markman City Attorney -8- 1 its 1-0001\2050037v4.doc E 1—E5 Pg 146 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of On before me, (insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) -9- 1123 1 -000 1\2050037v4.doc E1—E5 Pg 147 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF On , before me, (insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) -10- 11231-0001\2050037v4.doc El—E5 Pg148 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE THE FOLLOWING REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA: PARCEL "A" BEING PORTIONS OF LOTS 21 AND 22 OF ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 20, PAGE 1 OF MAPS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH, VACATED PER INSTRUMENT No. 92-447926, RECORDED OCTOBER 28, 1992 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT No. 619 RECORDED'JUNE 14, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT No. 2006-0406609, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT'A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 21, SAID POINT BEING SOUTH 00012'36" WEST 575.70 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 21; THENCE, ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND ITS NORTHERLY PROLONGATION, NORTH 00012'36" EAST 615.70 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID INSTRUMENT No. 92- 447926; THENCE, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID INSTRUMENT No. 92-447926, SOUTH 89°11'41" EAST 342.01 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID INSTRUMENT No. 92-447926, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 1 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINEADJUSTMENT No. 619 RECORDED JUNE 14, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT No. 2006-0406609, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID INSTRUMENT No. 92-447926 AND THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 22, SOUTH 00°12'48" WEST 418.19 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FIREHOUSE COURT, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2 AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 61.04 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 89050'34" WEST; THENCE, LEAVING SAID EAST LINE AND ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28023'25" AN ARC LENGTH OF 30.25 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 42°24'52" WEST 51.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89017'07" WEST 195.07 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 44017'06" WEST 171.66 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LAND IS DESCRIBED AS PARCEL A OF LL/A 2005-00002 RECORDED 12/04/2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO.2005 — 531707 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. -11- 11231-0001\2050037v4.doc E1—E5 Pg 149 RESOLUTION NO. 17-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00814, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 140-UNIT AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ON 4 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE LOW -MEDIUM (LM) DISTRICT (4 — 8 DWELLING UNITS PERACRE) OF THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF FIREHOUSE COURTAND WEST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1089-031-36. A. Recitals. 1. National Community Renaissance of California filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2016-00814, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of May 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the terminus of Fire House Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard in the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and b. To the west of the project site is a maintenance yard operated by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District within the Low Medium (LM) District and Flood Control/Utility Corridor (FC/UC) District of the Victoria Community Plan; to the east is Day Creek Fire Station #173, within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; to the north is the Pacific Electric trail and single-family residences within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and, to the south is land that is under construction with a new commercial center (Day Creek Village) within the Village Commercial (VC) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and C. The land use and zoning designation of the project site is Low -Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan, which permits 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The Victoria Community Plan includes a provision permitting the zoning designation to be increased by up to 2 density ranges in order to provide plan flexibility. The project site can thus be increased in density from Low -Medium (LM) District to either Medium (M) District (8 —14 dwelling units per acre) or Medium -High (MH) District (14- 24 dwelling units per acre). The Victoria Community Plan also provides an incentive to build affordable housing, which awards property owners' one bonus unit in density for every affordable dwelling unit provided. The project will be 100 percent affordable and is thus eligible for a 100 percent increase in E1—E5 Pg150 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-31 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00814 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 2 the permitted density level, or between 24 to 48 dwelling units per acre. The proposed density is 35 dwelling units per acre. The Development Code awards projects that provide affordable units with up to 3 concessions from the specified development requirements. The applicant is requesting 2 concessions, a reduction in the required number of parking spaces and a reduction in the size of the private recreation areas (decks); and d. The project provides 119 parking stalls, 82 of which are provided in carport stalls and 37 in uncovered stalls. Projects that provide affordable housing units are required to provide 1 parking space for 1 bedroom units and 2 parking spaces for 2 bedroom units, which is inclusive of guest parking. This translates into a parking requirement of 149 parking spaces. The project proposes 119 parking spaces, 30 parking spaces below the minimum requirement (a 20 percent reduction); and e. The project includes property line walls that are over the 6-foot maximum permitted wall height. The north property line wall includes a retaining wall ranging in height from 4 to 6 feet topped by a 6-foot high free standing wall, for a calculated height of 8 to 9 feet. Additionally, there is a 2.5-foot retaining wall proposed adjacent to the existing 6-foot high wall between the project site and the adjacent City fire station. In both cases, the additional wall height will only be visible on the applicant's side of the wall; and f. The large specimen Canyon Live Oak tree located at the southeast corner of the site was given a Historic Landmark Designation by the Historic Preservation Commission on October 21, 1987. The health of this tree has since declined to a point where the applicant's arborist and the City's on -staff arborist have concluded that the tree cannot be preserved. Removal of the tree requires approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2016-00966) by the Historic Preservation Commission, a General Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00964) to modify General Plan Figure LU-8 to remove the tree from a map illustrating the location of all the historic resources in the City and a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2016-00965). Staff supports the removal of the tree due to the tree's declining condition. The applicant has agreed to plant a large specimen Canyon Live Oak tree to replace the existing tree. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan Land Use designation of the project site is Low Medium (LM) District. The site is also within the Victoria Community Plan, which includes a provision permitting the zoning designation to be increased by up to 2 density ranges. The Victoria Community Plan also provides an incentive to build affordable housing, which awards property owners' one bonus unit in density for every affordable dwelling unit provided. The project will be 100 percent affordable and is thus eligible for a 100 percent increase in the permitted density level, or between 24 to 48 dwelling units per acre. The proposed density is 35 dwelling units per acre, below the maximum permitted 48 dwelling units per acre permitted by the Victoria Community Plan with the provisions outlined above. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan. As stated above, the Victoria Community Plan permits an increase in density by up to 2 density ranges and provides a separate incentive to provide affordable units of 1 unit increase in density for each affordable unit provided. The proposed density is 35 dwelling units per acre. E1—E5 Pg151 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-31 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00814 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 3 C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project is in compliance with the provisions of the Development Code and the Victoria Community Plan, except for a request for a wall height Variance (DRC2017-00032) and a request of 2 concessions for a reduction in the required parking and size of the private open space area. Development Code Section 17.46.040 (Density bonuses and Incentives and Concessions Allowed) includes a provision that permits projects that provide affordable units reductions in the development criteria. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. An environmental review was completed for the project which concluded that with the proposed mitigation measures, the project would have a less than significant impact on the environment. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment forthe application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the projectwould have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt.the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the Design Review application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. E1—E5 Pg152 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-31 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00814 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 4 Planning Department 1) Approval is for Design Review RC2016-00814, for the site plan and architectural review of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development for a site located the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard. — APN: 1089-031-36. 2) Approval for Design Review DRC2016-00814 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964 and Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156 and Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966. 3) Approved is contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MIN ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary E1—E5 Pg153 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-31 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00814 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 5 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E1—E5 Pg154 Conditions of Approval jtaxcFFo Community Development Department �L'CAMON(L\ Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS 11 SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Exterior: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) During all project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with property operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers" standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptor nearest the project site. 3) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. Interior: 4) All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well fitted, well weather-stripped assemblies and shall have a minimum sound transmission class (STC) rating of 27. 5) All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least one and three -fourths inch thick. 6) At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtight seal. 7) Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well fitted or caulked plywood of at least one inch thick. Ceilings shall be well fitted, fully sealed gypsum board of a least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. 8) Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use and sill receive circulated air. A forced air circulation system (e.g. air conditioning) or active ventilation system shall be proved which satisfies the requirement of the Uniform Building Code. 9) Prior to approval of building permits, a letter from an acoustic engineer shall be submitted verifying conformance to the interior noise mitigation measures. 10) Prior to final approval by the Planning Department, an acoustic engineer shall be submitted verifying implementation of the interior mitigation measures. 2. A 70-inch box size Canyon live oak shall be planted on the project site to the west of the existing Canyon live oak tree to be removed. Pnnted: 4/1912017 www.CityofRC.us E1—E5Pg155 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: Project Type: -108903136-0000 Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. A Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation certified Native American Monitor shall be onsite during any and all ground disturbances. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 5. The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 6. The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 7. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 8. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 9. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 10. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 11. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 12. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. mw.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 19 Printed: 4/1912017 E1—E5 Pg156 Project#: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24 inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 14. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 15. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only. to all parties involved in the construction/grading.. activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 16. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 17. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 18. During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. w1w/.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/19/2017 Page 3 of 19 E1—E5 Pg157 Project#: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 21. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing , the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 22. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Madole & Associates, February 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical, 23. Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 24. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 25. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66; 050, as measured at the property line. Developers. shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 26. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. Printed: 4/19/2017 www.aryofRC.us Page 4 or 19 El —ES Pg158 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DR02017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 27. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 28. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 tc reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. 29.If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within. the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/19/2017 Page 5019 El—E5 Pg159 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30.If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time duringlthe interval of earth -disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 31. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 32. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 33. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 34. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 35. The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 36. The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 37. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 38. Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. Printed:, 4/19/2617 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 o(19 El—E5 Pg160 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 39. Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Printed: 4/1912017 www.CityofRC.u9 Page 7 0! 19 E1—E5 Pg161 Project#: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 40. Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre- construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre - construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non- migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre - construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 41. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. Printed: 4/19/2017 www.CltyofRC.us Page 8 or 19 El—E5 Pg162 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 42. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 43. All residential and commercial structures shall be required high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 44. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal weather-stripping. 45. Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. be used to prevent to incorporate pane windows and 46. Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. 47. Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials' such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 48. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; Increased insulation. Limit air leakage through the structure. Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 49. Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 50. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 9 of 19 E1—E5 Pg163 Project#: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 51. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 52. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 53. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 54. Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 55. Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 56. Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 57.Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 58. Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 59. Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 60. Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions w .CityofRC.us Printed: 4/19/2017 Page 10 of 19 El—E5 Pg164 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS 11 SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please he advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Firehouse Court frontage improvements: a. Remove existing cobblestones on the parkway and install street trees per City Standards. b. The drive approach shall have a minimum width of 35 feet, per City Standard 101, Type C. c. Protect or replace existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping as required. d. The street light on Firehouse Court shall be relocated due to the location of the curb return of the commercial drive approach. e. If an entry gate is proposed, it shall be in accordance with the City "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard. 2. Development Impact Fees are assessed at the time of building permit issuance. 3. The proposed development is slated to be included in the City's Fiber Optic / Broadband service business plan that would provide a City owned Fiber -to -the -Home (FTTH) infrastructure. Proposed fiber optics on -site (conduits and fiber) will be placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed by the Master Developer. The fiber and conduits along the backbone streets shall be installed in a joint trench by the developer as the last lane improvements are completed. In -tract fiber and conduit shall be installed by the developers in joint trench where possible. Maintenance of the installed system will be the responsibility of the City. Development of the Project requires the installation by the developers of all fiber optic infrastructure necessary to service the Project as a stand-alone development. In addition, developer shall coordinate with RCMU which may provide for high-speed internet services. 4. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility 'requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. 5. Obtain approval from Sanbag regarding the proposed access to the Pacific Electric Trail, prior to issuance of building permit. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Printed: 4/19/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 11 or 19 E1—E5 Pg165 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING - 108903136-0000 Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Reciprocal Access Agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adjacent property for use by the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. The Fire Construction Services Unit shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as required by the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. Printed: 4/19/2017 mw.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 19 El—E5 Pg166 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 12. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 13. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum project boundary. 14. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 15. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown drainage plan. of 100-feet beyond construction where the latest adopted on the grading and Printed: 4/19/2017 w CityofRC.us Page 13 of 19 El —ES Pg167 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 17. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 18. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 21. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 22. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 23. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly. referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 4/19/2077 www.CityofRC.us Page 14 0(19 El—E5 Pg168 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 24. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 75 of 19 E1—E5 Pg169 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 25. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XLD(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78) repair or maintenance activities(79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used a{ sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural, infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items, b., c., and d. above. Printed: 4/19/2017 www.CilyofRC.us Page 19 of 19 El—E5 Pg170 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 26. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 27. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 28. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 29. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 30. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 31. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private, property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 33. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 34. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed:.4/19/2017 ' .cilyofRcros Page 17 of 19 E1—E5 Pg171 Project#: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \1 SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 37. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 38. The subject project, shall accept all existing off -site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off -site storm water drainage flows mix with any on -site storm water drainage flows, then the off -site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on -site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 39. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Printed: 4/19/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 19 E1—E5 Pg172 Project DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 40. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 41. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 42. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 43. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The ,infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 45.'DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of the storm water retention. vMnv.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/19/2917 Page 19 of 19 El—E5 Pg173 RESOLUTION NO. 17-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2017- 00032, A REQUEST TO PERMIT WALLS OVER 8 FEET IN HEIGHT DUE TO ON -SITE GRADES RELATED TO THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 140- UNIT AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ON 4 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE LOW -MEDIUM (LM) DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PERACRE) OF THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATEDAT THE TERMINUS OF FIREHOUSE COURT AND WEST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1089-031-36. A. Recitals 1. National Community Renaissance of California filed an application for the approval of Variance DRC2017-00032, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of May 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the terminus of Fire House Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard in the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and b. To the west of the project site is a maintenance yard operated by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District within the Low Medium (LM) District and Flood Control/Utility Corridor (FC/UC) District of the Victoria Community Plan; to the east is Day Creek Fire Station #173, within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; to the north is the Pacific Electric trail and single-family residences within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and, to the south is land that is under construction with a new commercial center (Day Creek Village) within the Village Commercial (VC) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and C. The subject wall height Variance (DRC2017-00032) is related to the development of a 140-unit affordable rental senior housing project (DRC2016-00814) on 4 acres of land; and E1—E5 Pg174 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-32 VARIANCE DRC2017-00032 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 2 d. The project complies with all development criteria of the Victoria Community Plan and the Development Code, except for the 2 concessions for a reduction in the parking and private open space requirements and a request for a wall height Variance; and e. The project includes property line walls that are over the 6-foot maximum permitted wall height. The north property line wall includes a retaining wall ranging in height from 4 to 6 feet topped by a 6-foot high free standing wall, for a calculated height of 8 to 9 feet. Additionally, there is a 2.5-foot retaining wall proposed adjacent to the existing 6-foot high wall between the project site and the adjacent City fire station. In both cases, the additional wall height will only be visible on the applicant's side of the wall. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. The increase in wall height is necessary due to a 4 to 6-foot grade change between the project site and the Pacific Electric Tail to the north and due to the necessity for a 2.5-foot retaining wall along the east property line, adjacent to an existing 6-foot high free standing wall. Without the Variance, the applicant would be required to step the retaining walls, reducing the developable portion of the lot and the number of units that could be constructed. b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. There is an up to 6-foot grade change between the project site and the Pacific Electric Trail to the north which require the construction of a property line retaining wall. There is also a 2.5-foot grade change along the east property line which requires the placement of a retaining wall directly adjacent to an existing 6-foot high free standing wall. C. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Without an increase in the permitted wall heights, the developable portion of the project site would be reduced in order to step the retaining walls. In turn, reducing the number of units that could be constructed on the site. d. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. It is common practice to grant a Variance for an increase in property line wall height where there is a grade change between a project site and the adjacent parcels of land. In this case, there is an up to 6-foot grade change along the north property line and 2.5-foot grade change along the east property line. The additional wall height will only be visible on the applicant's side of the wall. e. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The increased wall heights will not negatively impact the surrounding property owners as the additional wall height will only be visible on the project site. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment forthe E1—E5 Pg175 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-32 VARIANCE DRC2017-00032 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 3 application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the Variance application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for Variance DRC2017-00032, to construct a combination wall with a calculated height of up to 9 feet along the north property line and up to 8 feet along the east property line for a site located the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard.—APN:1089-031-36. 2) Approval for Variance DRC2017-00032 is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Design Review DRC2016-00814 and City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964 and Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156 and the Historic Preservation Commission approval of Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966. El—E5 Pg176 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-32 VARIANCE DRC2017-00032 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 4 3) Approval is contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MR ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: E1—E5 Pg177 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-32 VARIANCE DRC2017-00032 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA May 10, 2017 Page 5 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: El—E5 Pg178 LL Project #: Project Name: Location: Conditions of Approval Community Development Department DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING -108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Exterior: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) During all project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with property operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers" standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptor nearest the project site. 3) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. Interior: 4) All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well fitted, well weather-stripped assemblies and shall have a minimum sound transmission class (STC) rating of 27. 5) All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least one and three -fourths inch thick. 6) At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtight seal. 7) Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well fitted or caulked plywood of at least one inch thick. Ceilings shall be well fitted, fully sealed gypsum board of a least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. 8) Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use and sill receive circulated air. A forced air circulation system (e.g. air conditioning) or active ventilation system shall be proved which satisfies the requirement of the Uniform Building Code. 9) Prior to approval of building permits, a letter from an acoustic engineer shall be submitted verifying conformance to the interior noise mitigation measures. 10) Prior to final approval by the Planning Department, an acoustic engineer shall be submitted verifying implementation of the interior mitigation measures. 2. A 70-inch box size Canyon live oak shall be planted on the project site to the west of the existing Canyon live oak tree to be removed. Printed: 4/19/2017 wvna.CityofRC.us E1—E5 Pg179 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. A Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation certified Native American Monitor shall be onsite during any and all ground disturbances. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 5. The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at leas} three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in thel midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 6. The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 7. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 8. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans, to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 9. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 10. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 11. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 12. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. Printed: 4/19/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 79 El—E5 Pg180 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24 inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 14. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 15. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only . to all parties involved in the construction/grading . activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 16. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 17. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 18. During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Printed;-0/19/2017 www.CilyofRC.us Page3 of 19 El—E5 Pg181 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NO[) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 21. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing . the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 22. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Madole & Associates, February 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 23. Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 24. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 25. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66;050, as measured at the property line. Developers, shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 26. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. Panted: 4/79/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 19 El—E5 Pg182 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING -108903136-0000 Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 27. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 28. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2p08 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes Ithe installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. 29.If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. w .CityofRC.us Printed: 4/19/2017 Ell—E5Pg183 Page 5 of 19 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING -108903136-0000 Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30.If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 31. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 32. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary the time of year of construction. SCAQMD and re -planted with City to reduce depending upon 33. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 34. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 35. The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 36. The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 37. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 38. Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. Printed: 4/19/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 19 El—E5 Pg184 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 39. Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. w .CityofRC.us Panted: 4/19/2017 Page 7 of 19 E1—E5 Pg185 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 40. Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre- construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre - construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non- migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre - construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 41. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 8 of 19 El—E5 Pg186 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 42. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 43. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 44. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 45. Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 46. Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. 47. Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 48. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; Increased insulation. Limit air leakage through the structure. Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 49. Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 50. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Printed: 4/19/2017 www.CltyofRC.uS Page 9 of 19 El—E5 Pg187 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 51. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 52. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 53. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 54. Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 55. Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 56. Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 57.Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 58. Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 59. Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 60. Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed: 4/19/2017 W W W.CilyofRC.us Page 10 of 19 El—E5 Pg188 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC201600965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Firehouse Court frontage improvements: a. Remove existing cobblestones on the parkway and install street trees per City Standards. b. The drive approach shall have a minimum width of 35 feet, per City Standard 101, Type C. c. Protect or replace existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping as required. d. The street light on Firehouse Court shall be relocated due to the location of the curb return of the commercial drive approach. e. If an entry gate is proposed, it shall be in accordance with the City "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard. 2. Development Impact Fees are assessed at the time of building permit issuance. 3. The proposed development is slated to be included in the City's Fiber Optic / Broadband service business plan that would provide a City owned Fiber -to -the -Home (FTTH) infrastructure. Proposed fiber optics on -site (conduits and fiber) will be placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed by the Master Developer. The fiber and conduits along the backbone streets shall be installed in a joint trench by the developer as the last lane improvements are completed. In -tract fiber and conduit shall be installed by the developers in joint trench where possible. Maintenance of the installed system will be the responsibility of the City. Development of the Project requires the installation by the developers of all fiber optic infrastructure necessary to service the Project as a stand-alone development. In addition, developer shall coordinate with RCMU which may provide for high-speed internet services. 4. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. 5. Obtain approval from Sanbag regarding the proposed access to the Pacific Electric Trail, prior to issuance of building permit. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Printed: 4/1912017 PoWP.'.CltyofRC.uS Page 11 at 19 E1—E5Pg189 P.roject#: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Reciprocal Access Agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adjacent property for use by the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. The Fire Construction Services Unit shall approve the agreement, priorto recordation. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as required by the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/19/2017 Page 12 of 19 Ell—E5 Pg190 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 12. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 13. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum project boundary. 14. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 15. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown i drainage plan. of 100-feet beyond construction where the latest adopted n the grading and Printed: 4/1912017 wmv.CityofRC.u3 Page 13 of 19 El—E5 Pg191 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 17. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 18. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1604.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 21. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 22. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 23. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly . referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho . Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. www.CityofRC.us Printed' 4/19M017 Page 14 a(19 El—E5 Pg192 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 24, The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. Printed: 4/19/2017 www.CilyofRC,us Page 15 of 19 E1—E5 Pg193 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approvai 25. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used of sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. I. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items, b., c., and d. above. vnwv.CityofRc.us Printed: 4/19/2017 Page 16 of 19 E1—E5 Pg194 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING -108903136-0000 Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 26. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 27. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 28. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 29. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 30. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 31. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 33. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 34. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed: 4/19/2017 vmv.Cityo RC.us El —ES Pg195 Page 17 of 19 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 37. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 38. The subject project, shall accept all existing off -site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off -site storm water drainage flows mix with any on -site storm water drainage flows, then the off -site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on -site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 39. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/19/2017 Page 18 of 19 El —ES Pg196 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC20 16-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING -108903136-0000 Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 40. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 41. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 42. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 43. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 45. DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of the storm water retention. Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 19 of 19 El—E5 Pg197 RESOLUTION NO. 17-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00965, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 1 ON -SITE TREE RELATED TO THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 140- UNIT AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ON 4 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE LOW -MEDIUM (LM) DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PERACRE) OF THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF FIREHOUSE COURT AND WEST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1089-031-36. A. Recitals. 1. National Community Renaissance of California filed an application forthe approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 1 Oth day of May 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the terminus of Fire House Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard in the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and a. To the west of the project site is a maintenance yard operated by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District within the Low Medium (LM) District and Flood Control/Utility Corridor (FC/UC) District of the Victoria Community Plan; to the east is Day Creek Fire Station #173, within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; to the north is the Pacific Electric trail and single-family residences within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and, to the south is land that is under construction with a new commercial center (Day Creek Village) within the Village Commercial (VC) District of the Victoria Community Plan; and b. A large specimen Canyon Live Oak tree is located at the southeast corner of the site that was given a Historic Landmark Designation by the Historic Preservation Commission on October 21, 1987. The health of this tree has since declined to a point where the applicant's arborist and the City's on -staff arborist have concluded that the tree cannot be preserved. Removal of the tree requires approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2016-00966) by the Historic Preservation Commission, a General Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00964) to modify General Plan Figure LU-8 to remove the tree from a map illustrating the location of all the historic resources in the City and a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2016-00965); and E1—E5 Pg198 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-33 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00965 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA MAY 10, 2017 Page 2 C. The project includes General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964 will amend General Plan Figure LU-8 to remove the subject Canyon Live Oak tree from this figure. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The removal of the tree is necessary due to the condition of the tree related to disease, danger of collapse, proximity to an existing structure, or interference with utility services. The applicant's arborist and the City's on -staff arborist have concluded that the tree cannot be preserved due to the declining health of the tree. b. The removal of the tree is necessary in order to construct improvements which will allow economic enjoyment of the property. The Tree Removal Permit is related to the development of a 140 unit affordable senior rental housing development on the project site. The subject tree is being removed due to the declining health of the tree. C. The removal of the tree will not negatively impact the neighborhood, the established character of the area and property values. The subject tree is being removed due to the health of the tree. Removal will not negatively impact the neighborhood as the tree will be replaced with a large specimen tree of the same species near the location of the tree being removed. d. The removal of the tree is necessary to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way. The removal of the subject tree is not necessary to construct public improvements. The trees is being removed due to the declining health of the tree. e. The trees cannot be preserved through pruning and proper maintenance or relocation. The arborist report submitted for the project (Borer: October 10, 2016) states that the subject tree is in systematic decline and shows numerous significant structural defects and recommends removal of the tree. f. The tree does not constitute a significant natural resource in the city. The subject tree was designated a Historic Landmark by the Historic Preservation Commission on October 21, 1987. The health of this tree has since declined to a point where the applicant's arborist (Jim Borer) and the City's on -staff arborist (Dean Rodia) have concluded that the tree cannot be preserved. g. Removal of the tree is not restricted by a Specific Plan, Community Plan or condition of approval. Because the subject tree was designated a Historic Landmark by the Historic Preservation Commission on October 21, 1987, its removal requires the approval of a Certificate of Appropriations, a Tree Removal Permit as well as a General Plan Amendment. The health of this tree has since declined to a point where the applicant's arborist and the City's on -staff arborist have concluded that the tree cannot be preserved. h. Every effort has been made to incorporate the trees into the design of the project and the only appropriate alternative is the removal of the tree. The subject tree is in decline and applicant's arborist and the City's on -staff arborist have concluded that the tree cannot be preserved. I. The removal of the tree will not have a negative impact on the health, safety, or viability of surrounding trees, nor will it negatively impact the aesthetics or general welfare of the surrounding area. The project site is in an area with a large number of mature trees. With replacement E1—E5 Pg199 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-33 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00965 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA MAY 10, 2017 Page 3 of the subject tree with a large specimen tree of the same species, the long term aesthetic impact will be minimal. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the Tree Removal Permit application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the removal of 1 Canyon Live Oak tree (DRC2016-00965) for a site located the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard. — APN: 1089-031-36. 2) Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965 is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Design Review DRC2016-00814, Historic Preservation Commission approval of Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966 and City Council approval of General E1—E5 Pg200 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-33 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00965 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA MAY 10, 2017 Page 4 Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964 and Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156. 3) Approval is contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. 4) Plant a 72-inch box size Canyon Live Oak Tree in the location shown on the on the Landscape Plan in file for Design .Review DRC2016-00814. Adequate provisions for deep irrigation of the tree shall be shown on the Landscape Plan. 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: E1—E5 Pg201 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-33 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00965 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISANCE OF CALIFORNIA MAY 10, 2017 Page 5 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: El—E5Pg202 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Exterior: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) During all project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with property operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers" standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptor nearest the project site. 3) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. Interior: 4) All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well fitted, well weather-stripped assemblies and shall have a minimum sound transmission class (STC) rating of 27. 5) All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least one and three -fourths inch thick. 6) At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtight seal. 7) Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well fitted or caulked plywood of at least one inch thick. Ceilings shall be well fitted, fully sealed gypsum board of a least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. 8) Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use and sill receive circulated air. A forced air circulation system (e.g. air conditioning) or active ventilation system shall be proved which satisfies the requirement of the Uniform Building Code. 9) Prior to approval of building permits, a letter from an acoustic engineer shall be submitted verifying conformance to the interior noise mitigation measures. 10) Prior to final approval by the Planning Department, an acoustic engineer shall be submitted verifying implementation of the interior mitigation measures. 2. A 70-inch box size Canyon live oak shall be planted on the project site to the west of the existing Canyon live oak tree to be removed. w .CityofRC.us Printed 4/19/2017 E1-E5 Pg203 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS 11 SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planninq Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. A Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation certified Native American Monitor shall be onsite during any and all ground disturbances. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 5. The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the' midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 6. The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 7. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 8. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 9. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 10. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 11. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 12. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. Printed: 4/79/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 19 E1—E5 Pg204 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: Location: Project Type: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING -108903136-0000 Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24 inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 14. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 15. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) .are for information only, to all parties involved inthe construction/grading . activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 16. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 17. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 18. During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/19/2017 Page 3 of 19 E1—E5 Pg205 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, I DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 I Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 21. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing . the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 22. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Madole & Associates, February 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 23. Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 24. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 25. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66..050, as measured at ,the property line. Developers, shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the .above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 26. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. Printed: 4/79/2077 www.CityotRC.us Page 4 of 19 E1—E5 Pg206 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS %%SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 27. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 28. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes ithe installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. 29.If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Panted: 4/19/2017 W .CltyolriC.uS Page 5 of 19 Ell—E5 Pg207 Project #: Project Name: Location: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30.If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 31. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 32. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 33. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 34. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 35. The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 36. The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 37. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 38. Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. vnvw.CityofRC.us Printed: 4H 9/2017 Page 6 of 19 Ell—E5Pg208 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 39. Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Printed: 4/19/2017 urww.CityofRC.us Page 7 o/ 19 E1—E5 Pg209 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 40. Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl, Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre- construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre - construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non- migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre - construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 41. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CilyofRC.us Page 8 of 19 El —ES Pg210 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 42. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 43. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 44. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 45. Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 46. Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. 47. Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 48. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; Increased insulation. Limit air leakage through the structure. Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 49. Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 50. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. vnvw.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/19/2017 Page 9 of 19 E1—E5 Pg211 Project #: Project Name Location: Project Type: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING - 108903136-0000 Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planninq Department Standard Conditions of Approval 51. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 52. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 53. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 54. Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 55. Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 56. Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 57.Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 58. Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 59. Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 60. Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed: 4119/2017 w .CityofRC.us E1—E5 Pg212 Page 10 of 19 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Firehouse Court frontage improvements: a. Remove existing cobblestones on the parkway and install street trees per City Standards. b. The drive approach shall have a minimum width of 35 feet, per City Standard 101, Type C. c. Protect or replace existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping as required. d. The street light on Firehouse Court shall be relocated due to the location of the curb return of the commercial drive approach. e. If an entry gate is proposed, it shall be in accordance with the City "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard. 2. Development Impact Fees are assessed at the time of building permit issuance. 3. The proposed development is slated to be included in the City's Fiber Optic / Broadband service business plan that would provide a City owned Fiber -to -the -Home (FTTH) infrastructure. Proposed fiber optics on -site (conduits and fiber) will be placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed by the Master Developer. The fiber and conduits along the backbone streets shall be installed in a joint trench by the developer as the last lane improvements are completed. In -tract fiber and conduit shall be installed by the developers in joint trench where possible. Maintenance of the installed system will be the responsibility of the City. Development of the Project requires the installation by the developers of all fiber optic infrastructure necessary to service the Project as a stand-alone development. In addition, developer shall coordinate with RCMU which may provide for high-speed internet services. 4. The Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. 5. Obtain approval from Sanbag regarding the proposed access to the Pacific Electric Trail, prior to issuance of building permit. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Printed: 4/19/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 11 of 19 E1—E5 Pg213 Rroject #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval Reciprocal Access Agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adjacent property for use by the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. The Fire Construction Services Unit shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as required by the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. vrwd.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/19/2017 Page 12 of19 f1—E5 Pg214 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: Location: Project Type: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING -108903136-0000 Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted CaliforniaBuilding Code. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 12. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 13. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 14. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings, 15. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. Printed: 4/19/2017 WWW.CityOtRC.us E1—E5 Pg215 Page 13 of 19 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: Project Type: -108903136-0000 Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 17. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 18. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 21. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 22. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading ,plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 23. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonlyreferred to as BM.Ps, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. w .CityofRC.us Page 14 of 19 Printed: 4/19/2017 Ell—E5Pg216 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 24. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/19l2917 page 75 0(19 E1—E5 Pg217 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 25. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated priorto infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78) repair or maintenance activities(79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used ai sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items, b., c., and d. above. Printed: 4/19/2077 vnwv.CityolRC.us Page 16 0! 19 E1—E5 Pg218 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 26. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 27. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 28. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 29. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 30. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 31. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 33. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 34. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed: 4/19/2017 v .CltyofRc.us Page 17 of 19 El—ESPg219 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032. DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading, permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 37. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 38. The subject project, shall accept all existing off -site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off -site storm water drainage flows mix with any on -site storm water drainage flows, then the off -site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on -site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 39. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative; the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Printed : 4/19/2017 vrNw.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 19 E1—E5 Pg220 Project #: DRC2016-00814 DRC2016-00964, DRC2016-00965, DRC2016-00966, DRC2017-00032, DRC2017-00156 Project Name: DAY CREEK VILLAS \\ SENIOR HOUSING Location: - 108903136-0000 Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness, Development Agreement, General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 40. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 41. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 42. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors'. 43. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 45. DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of the storm water retention. Printed: 4/19/2917 www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 19 El—E5 Pg221 REPORT DATE: May 10, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Plannero INITIATED BY: Dominick Perez, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2016-00338 — OWENS COURT ESTATES, LLC. — A request to modify Design Review DRC2014-00207 to revise the plotting and architecture for 6 single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved subdivision (Tentative Tract Map 16578) within the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan,: on Owens Court, located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Avenue - APNs: 0227-842-01, -02, -03, -04, -05 and -06. Related files: Development Review DRC2014-00207 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: Approve Design Review Modification DRC2016-00338 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. BACKGROUND: On August 23, 2006, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map 16578 (SUBTT16578) for the subdivision of a property of 2.99 acres into six (6) single-family lots ranging in size from 14,315 square feet (Lot 6) to 18,317 square feet (Lot 4) (Exhibit G). The final map was subsequently recorded in September of 2014. On January 28, 2015, the Planning Commission approved Design Review DRC2014-00207 for the development of six (6) single- family residences at this site. The previously approved plans consisted of two (2) one-story homes and four (4) two-story homes ranging in floor area from 4,035 square feet to 4,146 square feet (Exhibit H). Following this, the property was sold to Owen's Court Estates, LLC. They then submitted a Design Review Modification application on April 27. 2016 for consideration by the City. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Site Characteristics: The subject property, a 2.99 acre undeveloped site located west of East Avenue approximately 2,000 feet north of the Interstate 15 Freeway. The site currently is without street improvements. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties are as follows: E6—Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2016-00338 — OWENS COURT ESTATES, LLC. May 10, 2017 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Low (L) Residential Low (L) Residential District* North Single -Family Residences Very Low (VL) Residential Very Low (VL) Residential District* South Single -Family Residences Low (L) Residential Low (L) Residential District* East Single -Family Residences Low (L) Residential Low (L) Residential District" West Single -Family Residences Very Low (VL) Residential Very Low (VL) Residential District* These properties are within the Etiwanda Specific Plan ANALYSIS: A_ General. The applicant proposes to replace the architectural design of the houses that were originally going to be constructed within the subject tract. They believe that the revised design (floor plan and architecture) is better suited for this site (Exhibit D). The design that is being proposed for the subject houses was previously reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission in May of 2016 for a different 12-lot tract located within the Low Residential (L) District, Etiwanda North Specific Plan, at the southwest corner of Altura Drive and Tejas Court (related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18960 and Design Review DRC2015-00811). As shown in the table below, the project will incorporate a total of three building footprints, which will each have two elevation types. Lot No. Of Stoa Floor Plan Type 1" Floor SF 2"d Floor SF Total Living Area SF Garage SF 1 1 2-D 3,014 NIA 3,014 678 2 2 1-C 2,194 1,817 4,011 655 3 1 3-A 3,504 NIA 3,504 815 4 1 3-D 3,504 NIA 3,504 815 5 2 1-A 2,194 1,817 4,011 655 6 1 2-B 3,014 NIA 3,014 678 The architectural styles that are proposed to be used are Traditional, Craftsman, Spanish and Bungalow. The Traditional elevation type, which will be used for Plans 1 and 3, will have stucco -finished walls, raised panel shutters, concrete tile roofing, stone veneer, decorative garage doors and decorative window trim. The Craftsman elevation type, which will be used for Plans 1 and 3, will have horizontal siding, stone veneer, board and batten gable accents, flat concrete tile roofing, battered columns, decorative garage doors and decorative window trim, The Bungalow elevation type, which will be used for Plan 2, will have horizontal siding and stucco -finished wails, stone veneer, shake siding gable accents, flat concrete the roofs, decorative garage doors and decorative window trim. The Spanish elevation type, which will E6—Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2016-00338 — OWENS COURT ESTATES, LLC. May 10, 2017 Page 3 be used for Plan 2, will have stucco -finished walls, concrete 's' roof tiles, an arched entry, curved windows and decorative garage doors. The proposed houses are in compliance with the requirement to provide 360-degree architecture. The site plan indicates that the plotting of the houses will be in compliance with the technical standards, including setbacks, lot coverage, and height, as described in the Low Residential (L) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The site plan also indicates that the project will incorporate 6-foot tall, tan precision side yard and rear yard block walls with decorative caps. The proposed return walls, which were previously approved to be constructed of decorative block, are now proposed to be 6-foot tall wrought iron fencing with wrought iron gates. The conceptual landscape plan includes the preliminary plant list and shows that the project will be in compliance with the requirement to landscape a minimum of 50 percent of the front yard area. The plan also provides a water budget for the project which indicates the project's estimated total water usage is less than the maximum allowed water allowance. B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting is not necessary for this application as the project is of no greater intensity than the previously approved Design Review (DRC2014- 00207). DRC2014-00207 allowed for the development of six (6) homes, including four (4) two-story homes and two (2) two-story homes. This application, DRC2016-00338, also involves the construction of six (6) homes, but reduces the number of two-story homes to two (2). C. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Wimberly, Macias, and Smith) reviewed the project on April 18, 2017 (Exhibit F). The Committee generally accepted the proposal as submitted subject to revisions that were to be verified by staff. The revisions involved compliance with Development Code requirements that applied to an optional guest suite within Residence 3, a golf cart storage room within Residence 3 and wrought iron return fences. Staff has included conditions within the Resolution of Approval for this project that require the applicant to revise the plans accordingly prior to issuance of a building permit. D. Technical Review Committee: A Technical Review Committee meeting was not held for this project as the proposed changes related to architecture and were to be discuss at the Design Review Committee meeting as mentioned above. Additionally, the applicant has been provided a copy of the draft conditions of approval and does not have any issues. E. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on August 23, 2006, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has E6—Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2016-00338 — OWENS COURT ESTATES, LLC. May 10, 2017 Page 4 evaluated the Development Review Modification DRC2016-00338 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The proposed project involves a modification to the floor plan and architecture for the houses throughout the tract, which does not change the layout of the tract, or the number of homes to be developed. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant, The proposed project is consistent with the previous approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 for a 6-lot residential subdivision, in that the project contains a total of 6 houses, one house per lot. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of the Development Review Modification DRC2016-00338. Furthermore, all mitigation measures in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration will be implemented with the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. Additionally, the project will create temporary construction related jobs during the development of the site. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. For example, the Land Use element within the General Plan (Chapter 2) encourages the facilitation of sustainable and attractive infill development that compliments surrounding neighborhoods. This proposed residential project will complement the surrounding neighborhood as it is compatible with the adjacent homes. Furthermore, the land use is in compliance with the Development Code. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no comments have been received in response to the public hearing notifications. E6—Pg4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2016-00338 — OWENS COURT ESTATES, LLC. May 10, 2017 Page 5 EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Tentative Tract Map 165781Site Plan Exhibit C - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit D - Elevation, Floor, and Roof Plans Exhibit E - Grading Plan and Details Exhibit F - Design Review Committee Action Comments (April 18, 2017) Exhibit G - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 Planning Commission Staff Report and Resolution of Approval No. 06-65 with Conditions Exhibit H - Design Review DRC2014-00207 Planning Commission Staff Report and Resolution of Approval No. 15-04 with Conditions Draft Resolution of Approval'for Development Review Modification DRC2016-00338 CB:DP/Is E6—Pg5 ego i*; a 4- ', �� `' , r r �?ti�€T a'"�r�S'':• yj4*y,: l�l'.-.' �.,. -` ��f'�r�. �' � . ,;'s1..:.. .r,. 6 "Y 'L _�`. r ,� ~ %+ "� ��,+•.'". r - :• - -`;1 } � , AL r' Zr st iFL �: P. sr, wr {-•r.?'I ��h, '. ii � j.-0 � i--'_�i..,�1f�xf�ti4A�.rEm �R JAW ilF 7, PI'a#eBuDrwC. N. rr -�, _ci is �ieclrlr fi[ke T it - ;� .•- wry' - �' 4 f m X F011 m cn - 1 0 Q 4 SITE PLAN wale, I' - 20'-U' OWENS COURT 6-SINGLE FAMILY HOMES TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16578 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. MIMI I PAM141141NIW%Moll:' I Mill YI M 'Z� .11911 1 Ml " X m x .a�.r•r 4�lu�Iv�WM tyNR1� �r� i=lfllw Ala �..IY •..w_r parr rr�rrt��.. 1 - JIS m rn 'G LOT 000 + 0.,2 LOT 4 0.42 AC r • y WALLS & FENCING LEGEND PRELIMINARY PLANT LIST e. ��IM MI.w Myl ti Steil. wl �l.2HIiY �iir � .r o A T 1 r O[trDWIt LIVING N 1111 � WINDOW WALL OPTION scale. 114' - 1'-0• FOYER ,rnl„x, P Q V I IRC11 \ F r— X 'NEXT GENOPTION kale: IU4'- I' -LP SQUARE FOt17ALiIiS '.LIVIN4AMIA: 11.,]II I..Ilnly. A.fA- wnn1111nrInla...1.- taw l/ nlfy li nnwnlrf AalA ruw1l III xM1nI.YAII'A ,:.+V{{ GA"&AKIA I,wfl .r4lal11 I'AT110 ARFA. I+AIIIIf I/InTFM,YIAl1A I. /11ItIA!aflflaxl alf• FIW II in'rt111 TIIIUIINI■I11FMfNl..]al .11u mWII =-- - ... .- 1 i OUT1X7OrR LIVING_ wa. +f.c. uY Oil t[r F1. ST1 I'. 1 P.I1 - i ntk L J QV [riiRG F 1"� MEL- _ Iy�r ,� k_ } I.AU ❑l1I1 � •Fl LLL ` u Y :Flcr: jj77 I! x Iw ftt .ld'A ti AGE a'ot _ u fli v r p 91lIPMEW I L FIRST FLOOR PLAN (Residence #1) scale IA" � 1'•0" ... . {kl - A!5•gll+ :1 II F—iyl\� I 1 slxl'1 'I DRBI.Ia" m X F011 m cn - 1 0 Q 4 SITE PLAN wale, I' - 20'-U' OWENS COURT 6-SINGLE FAMILY HOMES TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16578 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. MIMI I PAM141141NIW%Moll:' I Mill YI M 'Z� .11911 1 Ml " X m x .a�.r•r 4�lu�Iv�WM tyNR1� �r� i=lfllw Ala �..IY •..w_r parr rr�rrt��.. 1 - JIS m rn 'G LOT 000 + 0.,2 LOT 4 0.42 AC r • y WALLS & FENCING LEGEND PRELIMINARY PLANT LIST e. ��IM MI.w Myl ti Steil. wl �l.2HIiY �iir � .r o A T 1 r O[trDWIt LIVING N 1111 � WINDOW WALL OPTION scale. 114' - 1'-0• FOYER ,rnl„x, P Q V I IRC11 \ F r— X 'NEXT GENOPTION kale: IU4'- I' -LP SQUARE FOt17ALiIiS '.LIVIN4AMIA: 11.,]II I..Ilnly. A.fA- wnn1111nrInla...1.- taw l/ nlfy li nnwnlrf AalA ruw1l III xM1nI.YAII'A ,:.+V{{ GA"&AKIA I,wfl .r4lal11 I'AT110 ARFA. I+AIIIIf I/InTFM,YIAl1A I. /11ItIA!aflflaxl alf• FIW II in'rt111 TIIIUIINI■I11FMfNl..]al .11u mWII =-- - ... .- 1 i OUT1X7OrR LIVING_ wa. +f.c. uY Oil t[r F1. ST1 I'. 1 P.I1 - i ntk L J QV [riiRG F 1"� MEL- _ Iy�r ,� k_ } I.AU ❑l1I1 � •Fl LLL ` u Y :Flcr: jj77 I! x Iw ftt .ld'A ti AGE a'ot _ u fli v r p 91lIPMEW I L FIRST FLOOR PLAN (Residence #1) scale IA" � 1'•0" ... . {kl - A!5•gll+ :1 II F—iyl\� I 1 slxl'1 'I DRBI.Ia" m CA i U3 0 BALCONY AT MBR OPTION BEDROOM 4 OPTION -1-� SECOND FLOOR PLAN (Residence #1) m I U3 ROOF PLAN 'A' acalc: us-- r-a. LEFT ELEVATION 'A' scalc 3i W - 1'4r FRONT ELEVATION 'A' - TRADITIONAL Scala 1.4-- 1'-11' REAR ELEVATION 'A' stair Nib- 1'4r RIGHT ELEVATION 'A' stain 1.16- - 1'4r BALCONY OPTION ROOF - PLAN 'A' uva. 1.r 1..tr .. lli WnT BALCONY OPTION RIGHT ELEVATION 'A' "E 1 S' - 1-4RL'F ER TO URH 1 'a FOR ELEVATIONS NOT . HOWN m \ aa��w fff IIfiM i rtirriR RRR R1a rrr rrr ear rr■ BALCONY OPTION REAR EL_EVATION'A' REFERTO DR111.'_a FOUR FLEVATIONSNOT I;Illl 'S NEXT—GEN OPTION ROOF PLAN 'A' scale 1'4- , 1'41' NEXT—GEN_OPTION LEFT ELEVATION'A' scale -I I.I�" — FFI:R'FOURHI aFOR FLFVATI04'S NOTSFiOWN m m ai I tQ w ROOF PLAN 'C' scalc 1.9" r 1'-11" LEFT ELEVATION 'C' scale. 3r 16"— 141" FRONT ELEVATION 'C' - CRAFTSMAN scaly, 1-4— I%tr REAR ELEVATION 'C' waft 3116" = I'41' RIGHT ELEVATION 'C' scalc. 3116'- 1'-0' m I BALCONY OPTION ROOF PLAN 'C' _BALCONY OPTION RIGHT ELEVATION'C' ai= i s' i' w RLITA TO URRI :a HOR ELEVATIONS NOT 511OWN BALCONY OPTION REAR ELEVATION 'C' 4"W Ur " 1'� !FE TO URIJ 1 'a FOR FLEVATIONS NOT511OWN NEXT-GEN OPTION ROOF PLAN 'C' NEXT-GEN OPTION LEFT ELEVATION'C' scale: 14,-f.Ir RL'FER'1U UIM .57-OR ELEVATIONS NOTSUOWN m is I �Q LF1 KITCHEN ISLAND OPTION crab I fl' r P.O' WINDOW WALL OPTION I crab 71' =ISO' GUEST SUITE OPTION s lc 114'- 1'.l1' BEDROOM 4 OPTION stair. 114— 1'•0' SQUARE FIIIFFAGI _S 1 WIN[i ANFA: Aa -•w to ,GANAGL AREA r+A.+w.rA.JL. 1+A111+1.MA.,.I A wwrt rw,r ,INIIlLI1 PAIR$ AMI AA" unrnw-+.rx-ul..eta +-1 pl{a,UI. N4. .{MWMr UlA 1W 1 ,.,w r{ ,r.wre baA+nnlr+i+n-u,..ra, ,aw.I FIRST FLOOR PLAN (Residence #2) scale 114- - 1 , 4r!U"2U16 Al5<116 I- .I !3 s•li �k DRB2. I ROOF PLAN'B' lowl-1, P-11, GUEST SUITE OPTION LEFT ELV.'B' scoW. I. iv - u4r GUEST SUITE OPTION RIGHT ELV.'B' sclit'if.- 1-:1- FRONT ELEVATION'B'- SPANISH --r4— REAR ELEVATION'B' LEFT ELEVATION'B' scjw k,w r4j, in �.tl151I11EM RIGHT ELEVATION'B' �3WPPW�I'Ar m ROOF PLAN'D' scale l;m' - 1'.U' moll 1---ff a-.,- 11 E ri mi ml Annull-MI GUEST SUITE OPTION LEFT ELV.'D' scale. 3 ifi' I'-U" GUEST SUITE OPTION RIGHT ELV.'D' scale N16' - 1*41' LEFT ELEVATION'D' scale. .I: 16' - 1'dl" RIGHT ELEVATION'D' scaly. N 16' - 1'-0' M IR REAR ELEVATION'D' m C) 00 FIRST FLOOR PLAN (Residence #3) I AIA4116 DRB3. I I DIRTY KITCIII N ti.. ^ IYY,iff Its ' � r vrx 1 t;, WINDOW WALL OPTION OPT. DIRTY KITCHEN I.L.O. COURTYARD OPT. BEDROOM 4 I.L.O. COURTYARD scotr' 1 4- Fir SCALE 113" 1'-1.SCAL1:. 1.4- 1, -- ��7 OPT. GUEST SUITE I.L.O. 2-CAR GARAGEJBDRM.4 SCALE:14" I'-0- � f- O 'L J �J - w tL i l>•INlll iY Mal -� I4is I4N 1'.r.r OPT. OFFICE I.L.O. COURTYARD +` SCALE' 114-- 1'4!' Alt-016 '.• a,rux k� smil DRB3.1 b'' mrn LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION "r ) ly, . 1-4r — 71� A A 311HUNIIE FRONT ELEVATIONW— TRADITIONAL uw� 2 4- 7k'.r NEXT—GEN OPTION LEFT ELEVATION 00 NEXT-GEN OPTION COURT ELEVATION ScaIc 3 16 1 .0" I. z A-4 r ROOF PLAN 'D' scaic 3:32' — F.W m 1T I U3 IV LEFT ELEVATION 'D' scalc 3116• - I'-ll' RIGHT ELEVATION 'D' scab 3:16' . I'-0- FRONT ELEVATION 'D' - CRAFTSMAN scab IN-. I%Ir REAR ELEVATION 'D' scale 31Il,- - 1'4r NEXT-GEN OPTION LEFT ELEVATION 'D' scalt .1,16 Y 1'-Ir NEXT-GEN OPTION COURT ELEVATION 'D' scair. IfIV � 1-41" it -_--.. �i.' --c_'Yir �"��"'�- �'.+y I .. n 't '..�I ✓•�.F"•...�r-•r•y;#�,C� -:i�' S""4`h'Jpr'� -7t I f-t+'C : .I'r. , ' '{ ,•� i - ., ..f rrt.� :�+ i�+i 'r •S 1• :s;pfJry3�., - ( ='r /J' " e. f [.11 �,;..'" Y�r' ,.. �r.4� �' �!"r r .� ' ?. { '-s' : 4 •,� l'.. I, r �. .:: ai. f + r l .a . 1' .# _. - lkriL I— �' •vim � C,, �,1 .Lr'' -0 �`� .+��_._ « ram. ` �.- - ZL AlpFp- ��' � �� ♦i.rt f�}ter i� � t fi,' - �_ry - - +4-' 'hM/ -fir rn m I W N GRADING GENERAL NOTES. rw.w.w[,¢r....fr F ••micrrKa-.ww�cn��}•�w•uT,.a[.[ q•wM•tl UrrLtuuro4rur u�uifncnw•rmtrf rurpn.r, • Irr•[rr4nri,rr[ru+c(9ut...�ra.µ[iumr.mFpuw rwwl ,wrr�.aw, 4lnrprHrwtlnto,•�••rc r. [>iwHtm r+rH Montrrr rrwFrr.4 rr Itr, s u.ryu.rs [. wrf w wrrr[a ro w..rawop. wrL,wrw nrw[f,lpYfvrW wrrlPryw y[xlrnuYpr�w[Srr. rwwy�^ •b w.rnewaawr.�Itruar[1�raar�wP.o.. r. r ®[•�.y�wrrrr rr rr nar.. • r.t. t.�....n nar.�IH n}.w..r>.r ..irr.r[Fir.r�rri 1 w[rFwa.w,,. rM W.nnwr�.nwlrrwro.IH �� rrwf •r�rt�•pwr.wo rwrrwrruMMr>o nrwwuf ww•[lu rHwowwPr[rNow.vFww[rrvhrwrihp4MFwPn ,H•.r1•r.•fwr.wurrrr•p r. •1r.r wmrtl \•xH••Fu.w/t¢ • ry4clAu q,rrmr,q'.n bwW.wwW Wriol,Rn—'M Wfk [>�sru[yrr Mtr•parmlrin.Pn rrt.onbr� w\�� swwlnL rMw.prgmnur.-,dlr�. or•rrHYont�wr.a•[• whlw lrwn rV�4r.ura ae lrewewrP�o,harlur rr•r•o o bourarr wfs Ph wn +• F rn pw«wra1P «trrtpn Pn..h[w-. r-wu ww•rtrtp wworwA[faw rr prTrrroy .w+.[waM,rw1 � RrrwoPw,uahPwrurwu�r fah � rYr•r Y••rn r4croaamnrr[a1.p �rrr�M.u1 mrlrW.rrar rwr - rP�w,r wrrw•P/ru.gwtf Wr. rr �� uF1��L••rn �ar.a.r ro„rIn[w•r.furrrrnoru[wrw•owwr rf�tryMre•wY•.a•[�.Ino/rahoaawwwrr ff Ml[x4yh M,wwrNyPwr4rlPaMor 4,rt•rrrn rfsrsr..,or,r.o.•.�nmcd�cm. a,w.rnp4Marar¢.�Farihorar /v •wv.r1}r f.. rltra�.r.mrp.. Ir. wra,•rlP ru r•i�r �irrr.�[rrtol o4�nMirulrn.W[o • ��[rWu1r.�.1.l wLrratsnalrrrorHYw[r •rLaflPMta.wr.y v rir,.rnowafwrM\±rtluo.� Mpwrr w.Pw•a•errlFMn,rr rra••rprrrnr••MMrRw 4Ytf�uu� n r awr erwrr Crw,rcrowrnrylr Mrhrr ry n M hrr a nro[Ir.�wra rf Wrr M„Krfw ;u�rdrf[n. [, ptl � —�`r rtap+u ria�� p rcu+.f�ruprf 4MI'r rvtwwpwu9Pr11 Lohr[k.t�lrnwtr• ru[vr wrf[ Frr.ev.t�. rn.an.w ara fr.p w[,vuFa.s • maa\niL•.rR cRwmrrwclRx�F 1[wrrr.[w FKr wrnnrrwfwrnM1. WI R+Prw1[ur[•rr� Y,r.or[puuwaar u.ualM.r.ra[vrr,rrL �afr. rr ne��wura� rrtr,orauwrl., r �� u ti rY4.ne.rear r 4 W LrPa �rwrr r, •aru rd r u[rwtvawf ww[ Y «tvwar[irhn n rH n M [rnrw[..nHw.[[rW.. r wws ��.rarar . ,ra ge�[aogrF.nea M1lrarw enwa[u.lnanr[Mri11.•pn •[I+rr.rrtu+ra.ufsarur.f•.w.[nrnaro.•w..F.rmFrr �`��:.w�wn[.[�[""wrF..��11 f..,. r.f. [prrtt.r,w AaM.wawwlPwarawPwrw,Fcr f Wwry� Mrycup.ltrsr...n a erwn rw.ffwra[s.r nrrl w t�[IhP ro 4M4. rac,Praru [.rs rrw ypuwpsrCnifPranl•ww wffr BENCHMARK LEGAL DESCRIPTION w pw4fnlRNanRwf wrwrrrn wh wlko viNx+f - _ tip frRa:. rrrwmafw[*ie,saa w,lav re mwnlo aawrrw iwrwrvouir�7- P:;r L.trriv BASI5 OF BEARINGS UTRI77ES_ wm� rwE r/gwlwwrr� aMlwaln �wi 'w.wwM....w rw.Lf lu n•,[ o-..... w ha PlN[Yw 1HCawihww[4,arW frr� rw1[wnlb�wM1 rvra arAMRF fwllf ti-r•w.•a [afCW w. wrar F}f ria TOPOGRAPHY ,onHwcr.uvYel.•n. wrl.F... Q� "'•.41.nrLrlh ppr[T Iq r1, �r I.rwr+lw ETw.a.•car4.,f 1A in.ruw.Lrur�.ria•L Prlperllfru[Srar.oNuura RrY bwt+f-hw.� w4twr,n, tr.wnwfF myfi+r.: w+11R+flwaw aft wl.rownxrtro Fw iarm¢i[i�Ifaaof pt• _NOTE. ..wowr wrhne v.h; r.alr.Ikonww,aHor[wc I IlSnr•fm(ya4fTW MIfr rnlr�w>wr ESTIMATED EARTHWORK VOLUME IMwua Fr,¢Cr }twLr 2rwCr tf•wwaGf 11L1,flrEE— /tF rw.fr CERTIFICATES r r��rfaKraTal,wwwrrmarr. wfwlwapmnuwnr.a � Aw w.irLrr�.iK«��'::::_.y.rr� ,•r SH lrfu,hawn wnFrrvw[ww[r irtromlrwroFftaw prvFclvr r��(q' `` Mw•nmwrHLanaLraprlwiPwnx. .�ML1 f.LLaFTr nn r wobYwl fXrn Ca+f MMh pn•. rwr rH rp'i•u. rarl• yr[n. frr[anfn h. f•N..rf ww Iw.c[u ISV.if wH wlrlx.al,wcrra fL1•rr w W fwwlxaML IP1H a¢l w Mr.uJwllaf bw ,rr( W,4 asOw •I.Jnrrl( Irr1 CONSTRUCTION NOTES p�wxrnwrl�R ww��..rf lwr .., ar.l rf .hi Inrr —mlw�c, • \rwPar RN a swrn w,rr nh [I Q Ra11,RfT rrAw1 fLL prr � �othloh.Fr wF,rfarra r I,• Q �fl f.v /4W m ra /r• r 1)' m wf I 111 p--rt*h, r >o•a•! « Rc Irr o•w /vF m Lr SHEETINMX 1 ,me1Hn - W 11r Ualra•h+w • unor , I.OMhlprnta hwrC,E, • [ra�a.rar+•o Rw r bfE /I[Iw1V•.�Rr[NYh 1 LUgnwf/rrrq R/r Lbr,rry«p .hr,ry 1, ctaaaraagtl l•4twhY OWNERIDEVELOPER SURVEY MONUMENT PRESERVA TION !il•rFaLL ,P wIDl Wrf Itr1 W rtf] .M « n[Tllarrwliwh[a„}aaoR awNrMMMMf[t HtvC rrwrr>tupr.failwwbn lMnpa[t Y1 f.0 aca•w.wlf rlwM wr rw[s rwarlCflawRKa a rRa[FPw.GmroMCY ��"ry In• 1,l cnaow•a aLva¢l wtorwf Fuon mf - SITE /AREAS: rL4Pari Sryf[ 4Fryq uya \,uLir u�1TiT— l Wlsm Stases. LLC 3595 InLanO Empire Blvd RwWiig I Suile 1100 Omano. CA B 1764 oYf.a p nlf C•• dliwCc C•Lan.q 1tTm {ji Cw•r P� Nwbnpurayr Cw al,]P fy_ f.n.S a urrr ra I rwf tlfQ R'Ilwt Lilwf LLC arw Fr wWwrl f••9arNrrYrrrr•Nao ,sm war Cfr a lur.m urrvFp rrw l.a � PIr� n r:.a 1v11. narF„tr r.wlax.ls, cT a../fww NPr fru wrrf a rtrt IfMa rP.ra. \rpw}d Fp,rfglti n VIM.r ItlwalLL Mrb Mr n1IIC1 Yh.YwwM.IIC bb/y ti .heaaw,+wr \wa. F.[a npn rr afr Irap raPa rfha. np.p.srt r,nar (r r rcr.w.a u w wfwsf 5.4a/ fpfrrCW wee Ltr�i• -C SITE l EGENO `.t,p— Yr.rnrintr: Prt..aur � — •es•rlihorl.a H.c.nsawL..cr ^ wf .a.clusP.n ulr.,.r VICINITY MAP — rR.l!¢fwarnw„ PUT2016-04995 ... a .F .,ulrtl .n ORC2016.00388 .„ au[a,n rfar plTr+ra. p/ .a[in[[plwHPrm}raW rw .4KI,Ifi[rdwri !j�``frlIFA j]'j' �ell CITY e1.scNrr[nr of ow.c( rv[,L ., OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 1 �� TRACT 16518 OWENS CT. ESTATES, LLC :tom tEn L/uapan� y��-r rL ' ,rb r o, R Prtw Mi.(v I — PRECISE GRADING PLAN _1_ if r m 00 0 11 . m jp� I., CONStRUCTION NOTES LOT I o 0 ft4'1 2 0 vmrptirs %QUA JJ7F S F Ire —V. OT3 35 5 PAD RXI j 39 20 FF J8 0 PAU 0 si. 70 Fr- Fs w 5027 SF J9 0 PAD jy YO fr —44— -- LOT4 -p AREAS JO 5028 PA On 7 5 F LOT6 J9 50 rr PLAN 2 'rF It AN jJ71 'r i ja 0 PAD � 2 PA -te 70 Fir A PW2016-04995 0 DRC 20 W-00388 msc—cl or 0W.C1 -it I - I t erry OF RANCHO " I! CUCAMONGA 4b TPACr IBM OffNSCr. ESFATES. UC LE" I. A-1- PRECISE GRADING PLAN m rn N l0 ATTACHMENT 4 CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Bl11LDlFlG AND SAFM DEPARTMENT SIDE YARD GRADVtO DETAIL 0•KAI rm ea><kf ATfACHMENT7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUILDING An TEEN DEPAHTMENr 4r I* DRryEMIIY RAD1.Nf-. DETAIL n—aw ,o NF f 9 1�1..: Sr"[Fr iYwl C'- lmtw.rwoF O.lClo.o a,.,1N� � r �run�rrtri,l,.ru ....nFaa.. w.cIIarar! eunel. p�fa YaYaT�%ii�4!�ii H1` �Gx � b,Ya 07�'1`7�'p� 11 ��Y�JHVb��i i� � yVHS G G•?T1.il J,1 a:V�`!9 H N ;IVH�G I,n �GJHti �S4'+�ry0gl4 it V�\ ai! GJH 04H �qQb Zl��O b��q 4016 O V V i H HJ i �J J'�k4c' aq rs Q ARRREy[AT10"I rtsU Cl.s r` (RME Y.�IM r. ro.vrm,.uar..ra.. uv unw. (GRADED GRASS SVVAL£1 lar�,CYY [ PMr2016.04995 ORC20ISM3W m Ch U3 O Ao Fmmo Rif. .41, 4� —1 7— � 'r SFMOAr 11 -,4 5MI, 1 4 IE 9,UVD RK. FU4CX V si SMYON LL-L., 2.5% 0 , L f[I [Rau�a�/� ' �' '� SFCTION I" rl �' 'I r1pa SF0770AI H I? SCAU. IL "=b v 1"-25' t 1* 25, mr sum, KI +4 U� A SECTION (11-61 sui H: VZ5, 7- aa P. OVE a6 51OW, LAY. fFMI t\ 4z 11A -W,VTJON A' K SCALr 1'=�; XAL It 1, 11 OT :ILU.4 I I UV FEnCE! P(l i Moo j T '?Ir CTIOA' D—D SCAM 11 I' SECTION 11—H SlAlt, H 1'-5' VdIREFAIED cm nuf rKAIED V" FAA! Ef.W 7'YIIIC.,FL DMIL PMY2016-04995 DRC 2016-00388 .�m1��tw�.� Vf I {Lf w f GF.NF.RA1. NUTES FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL f hr•a• •1>• rr M_�ar 4wr �r .. ...... w r kyn �rwrV � J . r •r 1 w�.w-rw..w►r.n w N r.w w .«f we .. mow_ �.r..+s 1� M N ww•x r Irwwr •r .... Jy ar .�•. =wrar A k �f`•r ate+ +fir .a war r�rwrrr.•� .�... �� w �•• w .•w N rw..r r rrw» r w i �..¢ r..w • w wrw• r w+ w.• r r ..�+ar r r r w•wt r •rw+t •w•wfI wr1 fwY•f[,... IN w.wr w we w r w.rlY _ _ _ _ ••..Y r .w�a rr• w rSr r rrwr wwr .+.. ..fww a d•w rnn r w rr . •.rr rra w•.+ r r µ rrrr r Err. a.r I w n..•w�r� •rrrr.w .._y a_w wr s-rt .trap •r ..w wt� ww t . r.t . s. r ..,. w r �..� n•_. f..a s. r.r r r••+e f yr/ wflf wfrr r w¢w! Iwwlw MI wr W ar r ••. r r4• r �• [uYYry Y rr »f•r Y ,6 iN.� ..nt[f_ w N ..�ww wI _r a•. .wWr w_.a� 4 per• f.aa wM ww •IVt •,•vrwl •wr wrw • •rwwYf •w.r_ .1 •fin w r r �r.•ka w .wYy r ..•.rr wrti -- w..rrkr r ,J wr14••1v AS_w akr wr r •rr a r rar.w• _ _..rew� r I.w r „ w..r• r wr ww . N wf•.. rw._ w. ,n 1ww.wt wr.. wwwr . nwvr r �awrwl ..... n� a rw� r+rY IS r1w• W r arYraf w rrr • Y• Iw Orr. a41 r _war. w r Fs iWt wrw r _.fra....f a••.frl 1. r ..•aY .w.....«..r Ii ti rrr r sa_• r w_r •ova • wafwr t•r rrw rw•• w r uwwf 11 M Iw•Aw •.I I•I r wrr r r_ r Iw.+�r �r ter. r awrn Y=yr.•v+rr �r.ar _ r_r• M�4 Ire a�.r rr .fir rw! ✓"f _.f..Y+ ar r W ray r �YMI q•sw 1/ fr.w_a.r •w r Y Mf t•wt w w y r �� r •w•_r ti r r tV M wr fawaM r.w.r nr• ,rr w ,.r •! Jr r N wwa w •rrrk_ w ••t,r .w+r r +W r., r w <rr r .� rrw r t•I+f r wrt wrwp r w•a r r .rrr Y ti r�r P ]y_ w�•rrrl 1� a uYaw nr rw t� 4•[•f_�W �S rvf• wvwr•er1 rr QIr. r w r err IrN.•nr •arwr r H Iwrrw w n•f}! r .fw w w_y r.w•. r ,.+,.r r a.rr �... a rr wrr.. r w.aYr ..... r r .aww r �.. rf•• a•�• r �_• era !r •n•ww wr wfw r w M N !._•Y M rwwwt Iwrww r •aw.rMrw Y a�tfwn M wry .w•R •rrwr• •may w.•. r wr •�•rt awn .r. w•. w r w r.. aYa_ a .+ ++c w.•r•w wb w rwr Mr wtrr �f ra r_ y I� a•wa V 4 w•r r w.r nw� r wnww r•tfr r ••wl wwwr �+ r� r rr• r a r +•w w r •••araf r wfwl w Ytfr x wew "__ rfra y� w• ua w A. JJ �I.Y.1[�Iw�ry Ww.�wrwrwr.rr•r•_wwr srn.l �rvY :J r Fr Y �f ft•1 rr �nln rr r .yrw _a rr a �.�r r .r �a•w r ar wY �r� Al . Tf r art a r r air ftw•wf � wr Y.�k•P M_ rtNwYrnrM M • aa+► ¢ .ywr 1 � ff Y4¢ r Y f iwr [�Y Mr' w wa !4f wr Ja a. rya. w a.aAa1 ri w nt•,rtl •ff•'rw rfr N rr.w+ a wan .� k n s�+ a r ... •� .�.e r .ru.r wa �wrrf a.... uw .rr w. r rW w f.4•.Yr ar.� n.ar N •.w w wwrw wY rr M N rrr sryar w ..r W ltrr ..•fww warty rw� w.. w w.�Y.1 •r. Ny r. I,wrfarJwW rwrw ... !r fro r •want ar Mr ••r Mwr vrw N wvM . rnrt...a wr •rf r w M r •,rrr• r r r w.ar �•• w w�f rr4 w�. a r r wwwal Yr r •frees iwal 4 4 r� r �rY r wry r. � SP4 f.a yr r �� •.W .wT rf•• T f•� r .wrr v. Yaw � Y •rwrriaw w w� +w r F /rM rw+f r w f W ra v.•I N •w N !. 4 rf Mnf fM wrwp ryr rIw[•r w wlrvr r w a1tfS Iw•M1 west •� wr a r Lln + •r•r.r f ra to Ir•11 r arwafr wr•f W rw ww r nr•r•1 wr • .•ww nr.•wY r Il r �^NrM N wwww y r I•_ nl��l n[kn Irl I•w•wr w• n1 •wrlwlr M r w A 1 r W •. wN w ...—tci.. J•.• w� w-rw •.aw .v N •ww4! A Ar [wM r r•w / r W w r wwwl ,rYnr ••r w r •rr r �r M wrrw•wr wrf• r•t•w! M If-Vr fA na..� M r W xww trrlr f rlShed oayr�y�le U,Catw than I1 I— I3 in) but sm;l lrr iron ISO mrrl (G in) ' Corrugated steel pans, w gmal ylnde IOU mm (12 ¢_i`Illvir., antes nlh •rwise\ sp,•riliels py a e .N engine..r VBtrr Mors �TICJ?J A- A r ;Cxfr' C,,lsf+e] ngsp ryaln great" Ivan 7S mrfn 13 m) but smalif+ than 1 Inln (G v.) Filler fabrta r,�l'��r� 9 do -3W mm (12 in) VAn, un}wv nthnr"r speuhea by o saA= engv,ee+ notj Oirn Ia Laay runoff to a Ledment ,.Do aev+. c Qy�n O yl�a ~ A NOTE / wash Rm Llany deSv]ns :— be fetid 1 Iab,ICa led, Of labf,COlea / it un+Is may be used tp . W¢I`1ss`dty�?n Y. suyyly A,nose �`\Des Sa L� RT Tmi�AI TIRE SVA H Ida OT TT S j STABILIM CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONSTRUCTION NOTES © CCNSTRUCT SIAy-L}NO CONSIRUCTI0.4 WRANCE/VaT PAR I;rVRE 1. GN ;LIT EC 1 PLR{L CNAVELCIAG DOUBLE ROW OARRti_R PER DETAIL 1. ON SHt rL-I Q rrONSTRLICT TruPORARr DRntgACE OITCII. O INSTALL DUST CONTROL SIGN PER DETAIL ON SHT EC-1 STAGGERED I 3 BAGS HIGH, GRAVELBAG BARRIER _0 NITS I !l SaICQ OIKf COLLNq 1110M Illsnptaq��pTLr+w RId1 Salt C 1>.+r BOOdi94 J•alt¢wew•rrtrYa. Iar tY �"�`� IaooaR-i4IR DUST CONTROL SIGN DET. N.TS-- L� 1 NaT. FrflPl le lrl 5iLL'urS Wlrfl aLYfvlt fwa([ N l tu.t LIEN a:L.al..%% 5rN [UNY[r[L 9uAa IIfM IIn:fP$11_ " -.1 I. S-It arft rr VY a1L, aa1 rw N rrn r x ,� vl rQ vr:Y, ref 11 waq fL7 Run 11 ta, law t$ R�Jar n sa101 des v p Yes +11+ ■ ¢W o nn l+it�w.' fi11,Y f� Yi swi Y Ins • Ii♦lRr lA rtl1 RZa1Sn U Ff IfH M'/i1 N 1 S']rL4 !NM nl llLili'Cs RJN MM u+irnl l x wv ,nn ✓ N ir'Y r lT l w ¢ lr•r rot N W,• Y M ltrwq 14 = [Y Slfaf r>�4 G,YS [qfl UGp ,.Tn r pppL 1t.1 SaLdlwn�aas w, w., rl¢ra Yr•irM•(htl Nall ya{a•IflilarG4w�U rf ••Mwf wr, 4•a [IPW OlH i tYI Y Y2"tj µashy SUY irlL 110 a 71wi ARM Itr N 4I1'Y FAvfilslG -' nfLYYI R rrlYae I�w N Irt-, 1,um o I_1P, Iy=jgIL P/AtjyJt4 SREY `CU tlf ItItC whl n W txYtf nfY3Lf a11YLtra1 I-i1:�ll • w11_rSe_3! a Law IK1I,LS ••� [ �Kt{S1 rOi + •¢Sl mntS �V10. alP4 LIC1 '�---f nYlr lie wr .•YJ! a tit Ya xrr [rna n• •u4pt C [[ nr Lr aws rS —at IIYwaLi I nlatw•; n—, w[ m— mt '.jL—�.. .wvrneu 111aJ L Ilu[t PMT2016-04995 DRC 2016.003198 4 s m rn ip <,A.1 NJ APN 22/-121-38 AT"% 2r7—F2l=39 1 APN j27-121—.TO 1 APN227-121-44I is FRQs10{v�'il�S"I'111If.'fJa(s' N(1T$R I! [m] 4nls•.rcr t:.e,,:na n.rsr94tra rxn..art�r nr Iona r. 'r vrr rc�l !� i/ h4i 49.a1].G nlul Wr ruryY Nq [t lrl = U yl! 1- r _ [IJ n>.{r`YI hx+rr,r rx.w..f prnr y (7 Msr4l OJS• Ci��tx vvr nk urK pr ynr C{ — rar clsr rn+w w:rc, ru. � - «1 ePl+wra era i�w�P u HT r9Rf 4(19 IPI xrG r tt (hM Ism C MP s r4N rs ti.vaa vn�w r via rn.'P.. c r�ric me ��-� r..IrF szsar 4.N1 PMT 2016-04995 DRC 2016.00388 4 WfAl H VI - UNITY MAP. HTS i. " "-, , '.' ! ., , THE EASTERLY PORTION OF OMENS COURT IS COVERED BY APPROVED 0 IWNS rallPt `''-.'"III ESTIMA7EI) EARTHWORK VOLUME W. RATER 4 IVY n-l. oFRX I LEGEND SOURCE CONTROL OMP LEGEND A"-YEGETATEO VJlA=IIM AT InN SWAT[ A —A witl I i Rill A I E A IJWANA PEATI SM HaDES IW PRE YI[M15LV MWKNE D TINT IFIMUDE 0 TIC rtkL TRACT —OVEM NTS, /Qlbq 014 m STREET —l U WA I t EWIWTEAIs1ANAOEi•rANAM.E i—kEMIEL' AOfALEH, EAU-j1r6 $KAWs IIPE t�ARFM $DW��ITTT WJHJHE TOP JFWM Itrswrffn d 5 ...... . W', CI L WIL IRIS _lw 7 -7600 2 7 DESCRIPTION at REVISION I CITY of RANCHO CUC:A�M�07NGJA SITE & DRAINAGE PLAN TRACT 16578 WM2Qv8-W3U PMIMKONgm wooe6c37T9Ss 7 m G1 I to W I ' APN: 22_7 121-47 / APN; 227-121-38 Al'k 227 121 39Y, .AF,R' 227-121--40 APW 227-.i'/'1-44\� acr ;t� — ) ,mes- ,ram»•t,,��\ �ilj«)� �'� f — — -- — .I� , ..,>•� - � ,' '�- _ , ,m. -� ; .. LII ��- .d�a'�h'<f ��., � CON57kUf,TION Np7'F.'rS aF�1CR 4 � rx �y� ' 1 rnov nnar _ �L.-_ ' j IlJ IASIrICl 1'rt ii MQxif hrrr+19�1 M✓ Ott ► 1,ga.1+b75 y ilr r . �nIW=1 ; 4 I 57 ` i�J' (ji uRslEl:r 1'.. r v+r.nr .Et nYe q. nn sa Ia Lp '3 � +P. .--C..,_,� � I IIHA=r1 {7 ss1,� I Y� � w.u.0 dswronr.l,- tsn✓ Oi mriR f'.r HF 4�fOd ri144 A•Y.r G (r+++•IQ1li 4\ r. tl- / ��" ,�=.1 {� a+'iOYSI10 Yir�r/kb '�M+i nr f+ T111r tArd15Cof MW � 4 nOu-L • A-Rr4' I `,�2i1,��+f7°+ `�r2J � � trn�rHrer.w .rw.wl rt. RlY ✓+n..+«I ' r 4 itAKAm4 �n. .\+� -Ir y �J .. !I [�� ar.u.rswseanwl- a:r ^�1� LE �7 (�ll ¢M11:1'la'nrMr'.+Vr[P+EI¢7 Lt0++11111. t>• ir+ �[p+ r'yr. ✓� �,I -� � r-.,\ \ 1 c +y} SCALE: 111-tor {+l rt1lY nKaW Hii "iiC I FY' (i+ s — -ER r f.r Irw rllq N. /lS.i Sa.f Ra a W pl rtM f i _ + 1+ U/_-• Y�am,'-�.1 ' I.II '-Za4i"suJ—nr - Y "2 "n,- f4 'APN- 227-121 - 34 r L(j=/S>•Sfw-.rfRCU(R.QIY OrMWIIC-1 ,.,=AlJ--� r�I r • +.v ��.. _ r� Q. j 1 ■ ?�" IIr N0 1 A PAR � _;r.' s h .�I • nti �•+ ++ f^�1G' I:..w �rr Il!" .$ al _ —_ " I!a 7 '^'�!"^? Y irw 71" H 7 F4t 'BKI BW4D&gr gel s' h7f i ��h 5 • ri �i 56 - ... It I4.1 h+1 .6'I QLI m Si 4 d1'wnTfriF71l7�':•r"�'�`�'~" � •r r k �•.I _ntti� 2e9 t "- "..'' 1 x t y�s�1� 5-�� V �- _..'i:7L' —� f2 Mgr c �13 y 0#ns �-6iaR IoGk, ravn.n Rr^.ar,lr, �-1,. '-1ty + k IC ' -_--- r �_ _ :"♦ +-rT24T 1.•F1 4i ` Air g.F� _ _ _ _ _ _ _�r'+V• 'K 1 o — z �t� * F� +85^�J� i E H —�� I7 c �y �• �, '-7=�-.� �— � \/ 2- �E .PTO A-0� I sfL uiF�4'.ir ej°' `?3 �1; } 11 i---c c uu - ,, t'it) r j1 S � 1� \�� , i � � i � � '� - �� I�� ^_ t 4 + . .•r..r.la n.+z.v ,F- . PApp 38.@@� r.sr w.sr 1i=]I f0 =+stn �r LOT 1.+ ti -Rfv Oyu l0 NOT A PART I �r(�Sn I(IPA k11isss) i;, �: '' APN: 277-121- 5i 1 L)1 5LI{' .0 -LI` ��1".'.- ,�' F' is%ii."..'w . 'i' , lAIC75CA1! ,F':. Y �%,�. LiL•c. r.vr. IAPtA.4.r56 `J) 1 / • 'rt< '1 Add :u j.-�• r,+4e F 1 rr—IJJJJJJ"""""" r�J+p,ia + •1�35, o. `i:�u..ea , r �! 1.RE �{ r:W�1 `u M1' �x�4;Cyf�[i�ffl tier r4i !� i' t! 1 I +Tom - = s.sr..c rcll PMT20}6-04995 1` ORC 2016• 7088 fi se• L _z. =� - -- ._ - \ 'i ' £.. • at ; * �� w:L CONSUL i1G EWL fufANf ERS ... t;ns. r��..r r —_ •n........!�•^y x•.. n...nm.i. .:1.......... ..a ... .. ..... .. ...."r�'r n. ..- �••... �nv.n1 �'�rnm... y.. ,1 •� LI•r'+•. FfiSYT`'L J11.IIr� C. 4_OT L 10 T ~y 1 LG1 9�' - '+ ♦ - �+ ! c:ITY'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — �a, , 11 R n� T ' 1 E. 02 �. CONCCPTUAL --- 15> ; 1 Is ! ` j i CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN L _ A� . L O T 3\ GRADING PLAN FOR F REMOVAL NOTES ,V� UTES 7'(3 .CUIVTRA("f(1R Va4mr w i St, A*d xew; M�a Lrtmr.i2 (�NGfN[ER'S Srlr(Y�Nr TRACT �1A1+ NO tns rrL ewlrYmw,.lurw ""� tir......., w.�rY�— Tra 06YAIPl1AV QL111V1TfRS ,f9tllM.trlr.Z wsrw„Hl9Mw•w+�lo ro~nre1°�I+�'�.wl+a+a u.r w*ddFia,Iln ! statlw+Rr.:t n..s , �"•"p'yy 7'S•e•■ Y+ifalF Ltut „ 1�-1 +4s:Fyll/r ✓ 14eAlSiYw +all rF+ra' TW[IprIF YI 4urEf 1{E Yr>AG MC wl• Lr\ F-7L�1F ''• t>r 111A R91 v:a•.-u..' _ !YL •�'�'� !r• Y.a•wh IHY R+1 Iu 1.Y.Y M FIY r'A pll 413:fr'ri.."'.+s, rl.sr+r ul.l1 n+ f:l nr sn.'r.+Y: vsrrru.,urt aw+a uEelw+rta � f+l .ezwr,.lo.......wr+ 's ^+r.ra r,.y T•A a � ' mrt.ECR� / ir. a.irtwn`.r..,n.+ ,u ln+l-ur .(r f•wl AHE. MIS 10•?`-t5 � � 6 Or 12 V. I W W Vl ax �E "w'� r�urw.r»�� wiPP� �ti.. �� ..".w�.�ti.:s'w:r�i...r .�...�:�.. � K u....r•rr.r »un.�..r.. .....• Yv �W �r4M.,.[ITMW.wiMtlwLM[#t r��r •� c w.+ �rw...r..�Y ra. ..E.r.n4��,r..r r....E..:�y� ��:.r .. pi.�.�t..ryy"Y�••• P rWr 4.NwlV r [rw.•..rr.f.r l.r Klli~ r.r.v.rr.r..•.•'. ""�.u�J'�' . �,..r.....•+rr�re.�rr.wu,.r.. .. ». E.•.�.:..•-•^..�r..r..r�r.....+.rwr..r..rr.. � M«.Y. r+.rr.r Tr »wrwrW rnwAlr..rrrGrr.r ��ro-..r..+r•rr«.ry...V.. wr.•r.r �_[ywa4w`C.V :.r rrrrw.pY L•. r,l Pr rrrr wr.rrrr.rrrr.' � � r^"r•'•w _r..�ryr .•r. Jr Jr Fr. Y.y.EY.rrww 4rrrrtyrwrr n ��, .r.r. rF•w... wr• ryr. .u.r frl.s.s.r.yrr.s.rlr...,E.r.yr..MW4^. F My.r.r.�rrrr.�rrw..�»r.r • IV ewr. M.w l•J.!'IYILw.lY'1 ��rrr.r..r.rrr ..a.. G.......M wwryw.••.wr.. p....a.1:.Tr.ty.ry,r � �� .r•rw."w�rrw� �~ _ww.•..nnMMu sew• rry.�.rr.r.r.r. •rr..•.r.,r�r .r.�rrrrw 11rr...J.l.INrlvw�r�i,.-O �_ w, Y•Yr.r r,uN 1.•n .t.• .Fr,nN ,Ir�t.l .w.['.vr." 1n .... u.R w.E.yK•'. •.rr w•J ..a..n T rw�..•..r..rr r.rywrr r.r wr�v rrr.�r..� rr.r. w•.....w F.Vi•Ir. � r..rEwr.E...rw..1A•r •..0 rr... rc.rw.ww.r..Y.rw r.•.. .:«D. r�.+rtr�. w .r �er..• tiNw�.v�. b�.(rrl.r.rr.i'.r w...•.n..r r.MY.arY ..r .w. r..H,.rrr wwrarr.r..rw _ _ .•tE4 Wr1,Y».sr •/�H V. EE r1.•.`•r� Mir .r.ri.•r�.n rWr yr�-••...r.+..W 'iwr..w.+Ew E...r.w w.w.�r .w... r.••�y � r..Yn�Mr w.a•M.w�rw l'.1-.••n. ..•Y.»..+.Y•rry.w....ri. w.r•a� Vw�..wr i,ti•r.......•«rr.rra.•wr..wr...,w .rE.r'•...•r..n.r....rr rsl.r. YIFYP..rrgr V.•r.«.r rr r M.M.rr.r..r�rrry r rr. r... lrr =_ r r • Iacr•�wttl•M N 1..�_N..w�•iw.•,wE w w tbrrrE.rw rr � ruRw'.rrrw.� rw ..+E'.r-..•..» r. r.., a .�.. r M b...•+..Y+rM.�.nwww'.ww.r.r~.nyTtrr tr w w r,.w. w. r....•r.. rrrrti.. fa_rwu �.r.tirbw. rM1�w M 1-.•rYa Erw•ww~rrw....-.rr~r �..Y w..wr.. w.. b.r v.rrr.+.x �'rAA. er � Jr•rwrAA r.... r.•r.rr V w1�.rrr�.rrr r�i.� r lr.rr crr..rrrvr roouwrG•J.. , .lw.rE.rrwww.FlaeYJ rwr •r••r.r�r..r•.. w.+.••r wrrrE�.w_w.www'=Ly�.rrw..r `= wr.r w t.--n.. .•..... .ter •r.rwr�.•r.r trr. r r.'•E _ lr.Nr.ww...•.rr..rr. .r•r. r .y .yy .D~i»w�i. w.r...re_ ..r ^I 1= t rr' ` rrw.[rrb.�r.Ar.l•rrP.r.rMr �+a•rr .r[titi r..•.ry Y� .w�r.rr..++....w..wr..rlw.w rrr»+.+t.^�EEr�1�..IbYr.r.rErr.wrrr �f.YK r N G'. b N .r. w rrrwryW f w.r... rrw++lwwnrr�w.E•nw�..•...•.pn r .0 nn .w r ...r.�rw..r..�... E...•».rc.....r•..w..r �:r�Y.ri�.r.w.l: +.w rr , _.r�w� .w.r.rrr�.r_. cam..... r.y..w...r.�rw.r.r...wrr.r.r... ...r e �� ,'.rr .� �.w .. �.. r.s r 4 Irr•r.E .rr .wwrr�rw �.y r _�t•r^�� b.r.sr rrr.•~'",�f�r..rws. ,.. rr,.rr.�.-.•..• w �« rr.. wr rl r 'rl.. r•r...r�.rrrrlrry..Yw• .�r.r�yrw..a�.�. r' r.nr••r r r'r...a M�wnrr.r• bnV.u..�w'...r'.bw� rr•.. yr.r.r r .. .w....rwYLryr.'.'•...r.rrwrr• ..wr.....rr rrr...r �rwrr• i +,rs�wrVl I�rJ lr e..ra.. w.rrw r•.r.rri..n�r�. cw r.r. u.� r .�. � r •.W .+w wrYs�rw.y tom. .r .Y 'r.ry Y�ry r..r ..+'Y rrw w.«DnN\w..rYnr sr.rr..yrrrr.r rbrry...ry.r...r....ri ~..rr • �.. w rr..r.. r.r. r.G w.wY T •www."wr'r.. fir.. w.C..•....r. � _ •....= r.r[w r.rr �.� � ��.r4 �r•.Errr �wr. •A. r Ir �i..w..r.nr+.r. .V..y L.-•.1rwti.r..r....r. r. 1 M�—.wb.wwrwr.wrr..w.rw r.•....-r�W...n vxrY.rrLLrr..•r-.tr...rr, r w b�l+r.nr.r ...1 r rH rw +„F .•IrJ r.•••.r .ri.rrrr Y..r wYe mq{n.eKb.�y. r�n. M. Y� •r..ri r ' [rJ Nwrr.wr,.w.•.wr�..r.. +r.`E .••.r....f.r. •. ,.lrrrr�\a.r + Jlri•+w'r..w ••,...�w r^rM M.•.r r.r.-rryrn.....�w+• rrrrw..Mwr .. ++tiiwr..r..r.. r.rwr- ww.�.rr..r....V w.wyr Yw .4• J.r1. •.r.rll.'. '_._ rr�. r.rp.r..nr rl.rrwwww Vyo..vrFrrrti..rr.y. w. w�.•�..wi: Fw..�r.....•w•. r �••.. rFw.�..r. rr�. M�r.••rr •,r..�.r..riwwrr�....ly.rr.rr�....r •.r•pnv•oanr RD,»FRw�P.P..q.J1Eir � � Pr.n r••na Ofrew •. MA r r..1'.«Y�r.••..••.' r .nFFt �/ .�- .dJ _ _ r� •wnr.rrrr .w1 • .rM..r rrr.Y.......rwwrr .w ar.rr.�lp�..«r Mf�r.rtiC�....• r. n'r...rr«•..•»•wr.�.rwr.•wJ..r.r r..•••. t�F.�•'yCwrrYrCar.brl••rw..wr.w.•.Ir..•Y.1 p...r.r..Iw Fr.rpr.r ..ea w ......r.r rrr..ti rr.�r�r �.F •~•• rrwx.wa • ,,...n. l"—I laF ra..sFra.t+ �� PMT2016•D•1945 r l.+ a..rlP.ws ..R .. rla ORC 2016-00388 m C1 I3 w 04 ca. r e..r•a 6.--" MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM _I..w1.....ti.,�.�rra'. u......r... r rYR Y_-r»r»w...rr_r�. CA �nnw«�ira'•.•V r.� .r' .tom � l.wy.q rrrrrwy rpt.w�ui.rw�M.w4r�.�I w wOw u�.�w4r.r_wrtrr�r�rr+.ti.w ra.r.wi..��..r..'r��n •..--.w Gw.4�O.a... COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CA DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS 4� M,,.RICLi�IYMf tooi�rl �./l� A IOua 111.i,1['!- wne�rWaw [ao� �. IIIA .n�ya loq • tw.rw�._r r_.� • 1_4r1. T�•✓_.r. 1 `� w rr.r ✓Ytwl✓rwl.r�r ' wx✓r-y ti.� rn:ttir.r ==J w+w.ce.a.n na umrewensr...ntv.,r�uu.w m.+wrre ..Y,.a ruae.r¢ Q.e+a. e- tor«.`_ ... _r....._........w.. �. ♦. W r.r�r ' Wit._ � W. w�.rM w`i ..�'i✓:~w�..� PMT2016-04995 DRC 201&00368 e ar.rr4l..r.rwr rrrrw.rrl.Y..w rr.r.r • I_.wrYw..rYwM.� .'J r...rrtilti • rr.�«.r_�r�1�_. I P r_ Mr.P.w .rw.rwr r _ rw+. rrrr tw» ww w...r•. wrw Y 6.Fr � ••_wr•• ra.rVr..r.«Y.r_.wrfrw. , M� w_r�ww.r�• J . ra•Y.n.m.rYe rate..o morYr w+�.n'I�I mares re. r pr•rt..r rrr.rrwr. a rYYrYY.rrr. M.1. ...rYrr was t4.r.e1 r.Y r..! wm p.M.w.r. Iw q..n.arp Rancho Cucamonga Fire Proleclron VaRO Fine Co alruchon Nennncm STANDARD CONDITIONS 71( fQlOM1f 6T4O.110 LdOrrONS .H'lY re rNl$AML I.Clrrw -rr�r�.w. • yrrY_....4..1�wr.rry.r.r_._rrr�. hron I FIF N rl.9.w rrlrrlrtir.. srr.n I .�.rU.e Irf+Mnwarxtir.M•w..r.rw-rw1, •r.� rb.raaowr..Y. s.r.rt r.wttc. wrrr.r.rrr� .'0'"u~. darer.er aeo...f. NEOATR FIVE" LARATN7N Y•.r«Y �w.r—• i110W6 �.w1 tiMrw.r ...wow n� ; r� �� . Yr• or t� r,. I.M w..w. y.� r r.. �• r.. r.» wYY,�g_f'.%tirr�w.r� r1 r.._ �I PMT2018.04995 DRC 2016.00388 nI I%IL 1 v9 zv I r - r .VV r-mIVIm DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Ray Wimberly 7100 P.M_ Rich Macias Candyce Burnett Donald Granger Alternates: Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca Additional Staff Present,- Mike Smith, Senior Planner; Dominick Perez, Associate Planner; Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS None This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. Page 1 of 4 EXHIBIT F E6—Pg38 P%r-rxlL- I V, Lv I I - I .VV rNIVIS DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE C1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00726 - IPT ARROW ROUTE DC, LP - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 611,573 square foot industrial building on 26.63 acres of land in the General Industrial (GI) District on the north side of Arrow Route and west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0229-021-60. The Committee accepted the changes made by the applicant and forwarded project to Planning Commission. C2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557 - W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS - A request to subdivide a parcel of 42,150 square feet into three (3) parcels in conjunction with the development of three (3) single-family residential homes within the Low (L) Residential District located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. Related file: Minor Design Review DRC2014-00700. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 - W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS - A request to develop three (3) single-family residential homes in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map 19557 on a parcel of 42,150 square feet within the Low Residential (L) District located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557. The Committee briefly discussed the project and recommended approval with no issues and forwarded project to Planning Commission, C3. DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2016-00338 - OWEN'S COURT ESTATES, LLC. - A request to modify Design Review DRC2014-00207 for an approved 6-lot subdivision to revise the plotting and architecture for six (6) single-family residences within the Low Residential (L) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, on Owens Court, located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Banyan Street - APNs: 0227-842-01, -02, -03, -04, -05 and -06. Related files: Development Review DRC2014-00207 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. The Committee briefly discussed the project and recommended approval subject to staff's recommended conditions and forwarded project to Planning Commission, C4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUSTPM19762 - DR HORTON - A request to subdivide 28.4 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20032 - DR HORTON - A request for a residential condominium subdivision for 380 residential units on 28.4 Page 2 of 4 E6-Pg39 r.. .'%lW. . v7 iv I I — I ■LIV 9—aIN0 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE acres of land in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00450 - DR HORTON - A request for site plan and architectural review in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102. Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-00451 - DR HORTON - A request for a Uniform Sign Program in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN; 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. The Committee recommended approval subject to the following; Village A: For the 3 story Townhome Rowhome on all 5, 6, or 7 plex buildings and elevation schemes, additional materials and elements shall be added to the front and rear elevations that are appropriate to the Craftsman -inspired design. Materials shall include the following as appropriate: board and batten and lap siding, introducing brick, additional amounts of shingle siding, and windows appropriate to the architectural style. Village D: For all plans and architectural styles, additional materials and elements shall be added that are appropriate to each style to achieve the 360 degree architecture requirement. For the Craftsman and Shingle styles, materials shall include board and batten siding, shingle siding, brick or rock, lap siding. For the Santa Barbara and Italianate style, materials and features shall include elements and architectural vocabulary that Page 3 of 4 E6—Pg40 I Vy A@W I r - I .vv r.frl. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE are authentic to the style and placed on the wall plane appropriately in order to meet the 360 design requirement. In addition, the following enhancements shall be made: - Plans 1 B, 1 C and 1D: Rework the locations of the 3"plaster recess to reflect each style in an authentic manner, - Plans 2A, 2B and 2D.- With the exception of the first floor on Plans 2B and 2D, rework the locations of the 3"plaster recess to reflect each style in authentic manner. - Plans 3B, 3C and 3D: Rework the locations of the 3" plaster recess to reflect each style in an authentic manner. All Villages: All garage doors shall be appropriate and enhance the architectural style, and generic door styles shall not be used_ Linear park: The presented an updated and revised linear park design that was not part of the Committee's plan packet. The Committee found the park layout acceptable. The linear park was designed with the following features and amenities: sidewalk on two sides, two open turf areas that could be utilized for open play, soccer, badminton, and volleyball, bench seating, two shaded areas with game tables, and two bocce ball courts_ D. ADJOURNMENT The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist Il with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on day, Thursday, April 6, 2017, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Jennifer Palacios Office Specialist II City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 4 of 4 E6—Pg41 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7-00 p.m. Dominick Perez April 18, 2017 DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2016-00338 - OWEN'S COURT ESTATES, LLC. - A request to modify Design Review DRC2014-00207 for an approved 6-lot subdivision to revise the plotting and architecture for six (6) single-family residences within the Low Residential (L) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, on Owens Court, located on the west side of East Avenue and south ' of Banyan Street - APNs: 0227-842-01, -02, -03, -04, -05 and -06. Related files: Development Review DRC2014-00207 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578„ Site Characteristics; The subject property, a 2.99 acre undeveloped site within the Low Residential (L) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, is located west of East Avenue approximately 2.000 feet north of the Interstate 15 Freeway. The site is surrounded to the north, south, east and west by single-family residences. The properties to the north and west are located within the Very Low Residential (VL) District and the properties to the east and south are located within the Low Residential (L) District. The subject property and ali surrounding properties are within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The site currently is without street improvements. Background: On August 23, 2006, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map 16578 (SUBTT16578) for the subdivision of a property of 2.99 acres into six (6) single-family lots ranging in size from 14,315 square feet (Lot 6) to 18,317 square feet (Lot 4). The final map was subsequently recorded in September of 2014. On January 28, 2015, the Planning Commission approved Design Review DRC2014-00207 for the development of six (6) single-family residences at this site. The previously approved plans consisted of two (2) one-story homes and four (4) two- story homes ranging in floor area from 4,035 square feet to 4,145 square feet (Exhibit A). Fallowing this, the property was sold to Owen's Court Estates LLC. They then submitted a Design Review Modification application on April 27, 2016 for consideration by the City. Design Parameters: The applicant proposes to replace the architectural design of the houses that were originally going to be constructed within the subject tract They believe that the revised design (floor plan and architecture) is better suited for this site The design that is being proposed for the subject houses was previously reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission in May of 2016 for a different 12•lot tract located within the Low Residential (L) District, Etiwanda North Specific Plan, at the southwest corner of Altura Drive and Tejas Court (related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18960 and Design Review DRC2015-00811). As shown in the table below, the project will incorporate a total of three building footprints, which will each have two elevation types. Lot No. Of Story Floor Plan Type i S' Floor {SF) 2n° Floor (SF) Total Living Area SF ( ) Garage SF ( ) 1 1 2-D 3,014 NIA 3.014 678 2 2 1-C 2,194 1,817 4,011 655 3 1 3-A 3,504 NIA 3,504 815 4 1 3-D 3,504 NIA 3,504 815 5 2 1-A 2.194 1,817 4,011 655 6 1 2-B 3,014 NIA 3,014 678 E6—Pg42 DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2016-00338 — OWENS COURT ESTATES, LLC. April 18, 2017 Page 2 The architectural styles that are proposed to be used are Traditional, Craftsman, Spanish and Bungalow. The Traditional elevation type, which will be used for Plans 1 and 3, will have stucco - finished walls, raised panel shutters, concrete tile roofing, stone veneer, decorative garage doors and decorative window trim. The Craftsman elevation type, which will be used for Plans 1 and 3, will have horizontal siding, stone veneer, board and batten gable accents, flat concrete the roofing, battered columns, decorative garage doors and decorative window trim. The Bungalow elevation type, which will be used for Plan 2, will have horizontal siding and stucco -finished walls, stone veneer, shake siding gable accents, flat concrete tile roofs, decorative garage doors and decorative window trim. The Spanish elevation type, which will be used for Plan 2, will have stucco -finished walls, concrete 's' roof tiles, an arched entry, curved windows and decorative garage doors. The proposed houses are in compliance with the requirement to provide 360- degree architecture. The site plan indicates that the plotting of the houses will be in compliance with the technical standards, including setbacks, lot coverage, and height, as described in the Low Residential (L) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The site plan also indicates that the project will incorporate 6-foot tall tan precision side yard and rear yard block walls with decorative caps. The proposed return walls, which were previously approved to be constructed of decorative block, are now proposed to be 6-foot tall wrought iron fencing with wrought iron gates. The conceptual landscape plan includes the preliminary plant list and shows that the project will be in compliance with the requirement to landscape a minimum of 50 percent of the front yard area. The plan also provides a water budget for the project which indicates the project's estimated total water usage is less than the maximum allowed water allowance. Staff Comments: Staff is in support of the proposed Design Review Modification (DRC2016- 00338). The residences are well designed and the architectural design theme, and roof and wall plane articulation, has been applied to all elevations. As mentioned, the proposed architectural product was previously reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission for a 12-lot single-family residential tract located within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in May of 2016. Other than the issues discussed below, the project complies with the requirements specified in the Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Plan. Major Issues: The following design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Each of the three floorplans include multiple options. Residence 3 includes an optional guest suite in lieu of a 2-car garage (see sheets DRB3.1 a and ❑R133.1 b). The guest suite meets the definition of a "Second Dwelling Unit" per Section 17.126 of the Development Cede as it allows complete independent living facilities for one or more persons, with permanent requirements for sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation sited on the same parcel as the primary dwelling unit. Per Section 17.100.020(G) of the Development Code, an additional single -car garage space is to be provided with the addition of an attached or detached second dwelling unit that contains a kitchen. This requirement is in addition to the 2-car garage necessary to be provided for the primary single-family residence. Staff recognizes that the guest suite is an option. However, staff found that should this option be chosen by a future homeowner, the property would not be in compliance with the Code as the house will only have a 2-car garage, and will be deficient by one vehicle garage space. Due to this, staff recommends making the following changes to remedy the issue: E6—Pg43 DRC COMMENTS ' DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION ORC2016-00338 - OWENS COURT ESTATES. LLC. April 18. 2017 Page 3 a Remove the option from the plans. b Remove the kitchen from the option, since additional garage parking is not required for guest units that do not include a kitchen. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Residence 3 includes 3,504 square feet of living space and 815 square feet of garage area. The garage area, which is divided into two separate areas towards the front of the house, includes a 421 square foot two -car garage and a 394 square foot golf cart storage room_ Per the Development Code, a two -car garage is required to have a minimum unobstructed interior dimension of 20 feet by 20 feet Since the 421 square foot two -car garage complies with this requirement. staff does not have any issues with this area. However, the 394 square foot golf cart storage room has interior dimensions of 1S feet 9 inches by 20 feet f- inch, and therefore does not qualify as a two -car garage. Staff recommends the applicant revise the interior dimensions of the garage to maintain a minimum area of 20 feet by 20 feet_ Based on the layout of the two lots that this plan will occupy (Lots 3 and 4), this option appears to be possible as the minimum side -yard setback for both lots is 10 feet and the site plan indicates the houses are currently setback approximately 24 feet from the side property line. Code Compliance Issues: The site plan indicates the applicant is proposing to install wrought iron return fences and wrought iron gales between the house and the side yard block walls, which is inconsistent with the wall materials for the previously approved Design Review (DRC2014-00207) for this site DRC2014-00207 was approved with all side yard, rear yard and return walls to be constructed of decorative block. Furthermore. per the design standards specified within the Development Code, return walls are to be compatible with architectural style and if more than one house design exists. a simple wai design is preferred. For these reasons, staff recommends the project incorporate return walls that are constructed of decorative block and compatible with the side yard and rear yard block walls. Additionally, all portions of the return walls that are visible from public view shall be of decorative material. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1, None. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee forward the project to the Planning Commission for their review and final action with the condition that staffs comments lisled above are incorporated into the project. Attachments: Exhibit A - Site, Architectural and Conceptual Grading Plans for Design Review DRC2014-00207 E6-Pg44 m I to tl r� r r—t SITE BAN I rk ie a .YM —, teaemwnn r�s�t •-. iaw. Nar.wM1.r Wr .r�IM1��w�Miw�i•w• �� .Larbl Marty .rfMr M! �• .6iMY '�YR ~i��r"�—r.1 l.u. MaMr•�� r, �� _ _ wNalwuw ,w). SAY �Irrya.wrr y rww bat —w . v A.irw fN1 .M1IyYN .��w • - IwrN -'wow ' • u�Ibs r�F I „r.+. �� wrTww• fwa}yrW �l�wt_ rM •fl_ •f�YwOIW f/, ••M YN WI .r1 : i�Y - Y.o.nq-+ .�M,. ��Y/rrY -•rY•- �w �_�yw_ f 11—..—I rr ..w. •.a.rwN u nlurr rur was..aw� Q6�ODIf�1 •• b w Yw�r �•• .f+.r b.yw rI��YIrLL M/ram rr •sra '-•M1�r_ F i -• •_, wNw MM1� wa Ln w� FIw Mr^' • WrN ...ram 'fir~ aw —'r ��bl'�MaN. �-r 'M11', ..wY.,ra S �Yr, y,. ••�M1fN,�w u�~Wrr Iwrs�a4 �`�- M1w�,I�w• 'aM1 r•IM1R'•.rr, N.[•,IM1, PROJECT DATA r.Y NOM5 -, ., 3 urt tr MMIlM [irJJOO� F-7 MI,Iru N y. w.Nl+ Ar• _ .yM1Yr SP- I m U3 rn I EAST Vi"ATION iHa 51 SO" Ul"ATION VEST ELEVATION f:"lzilog-MWMC7� A-1.0 m cn I l0 V �.a fMmlL1 kw , r�uaw - i c I jr was ❑ —. 'i I4 _ 1 i I i N I n�Te.t � rr • .ice_ —.»..—-..--^..—._—�—I�—♦ � I I.r I � u .+a• ...mac A-I.I LOT I - FIRST FLOOR PLAN (PLAN A) I m m t 00 UrrQ cr.A NY F. rr iV• •ti 'Ifw'W W I�IYL.• rw i we:• r. lrµ]. M4• A-I.2 m ch I U3 vi 2 — FJR5T FLOOR PLAN •— -- —�. _.�--_..-ter------------,—. ___--.__ ___._ '--.-__....-....• j_. _— a, � ___ .. � _.•err_ .- ..-..'-._.. � ..r._.-_....�' R7Rr 1 67{IIOt� •T .y.r� .,n Lw--------------- Lrm FM r r I r �� tatcr 4 � {isreerwa WYfJ�29Ya! � yraerrew r ❑ ! � i3i3 Ftrl. 41R P RrJIo,bA M JAM. r . n-LL-a tvrjp asnw"-, b%bvw. ----------- ----------- LOT 2 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN merle ----------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - L p >1 L -L- -17- LOT 2 - ROOF PLAN (PLAN A -REVERSED) m rn I ul ram. r. .nr. rr� ww v.rr _ � �•..r.� w.r� fwmr� LOT 3 - EAST ELEVATION (CALIFORNIA BUH&ALONU El .� UVCJD LOT 9 4 NORTH ELEVATION (CALIFORNIA BUNSALOW) r - Ll_ i •5c• wau t• LOT B - SOUTH ELEVATION (GALIFORNIA BUNGALONU +� * g M•1• FIR LOT 9 -WEST ELEVATION (CALIFORNIA SUNSALOWI •_ M�v m U3 %.n O-n scan. we EdNUlJa cl A-3 I LOT 3 - FLOOR PLAN (PLAN D) 7 1 I 1 } _ I II 1 I j " / 1 I i I _ I } i1 I I 1 I I Ir I I 1 I 1 I I[1 MM Y�•r 1I11{1 N I I+ #Y I� +•n.• m G� I cn Ln V { { . {wit , awe LOT 4 — EAST ELEVATION (CRAFTSMAN) I CITY A LOT 4 - NORTH ELEVATION (CRAFTSMAN) `a 2 7ii-ffisll JFL. -- nwrt LOT 4 - MST ELEVATION (CRAFT5MAN) S — w . � —W - - - A-4.0 LOT 4 - 5OVrH ELEVATION (CRAFTSMAN) 4 C"rtw ■ -AC- LOT 4 - FLOOR PLAN m rn U3 LLn a LOT 4 - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - np ®� • ==�-�= _. _�1 �- [LEI �'�1. -=— --�~�e I Du sic'., OF I FOR]= am _- --_ -- ion. 11 WINv�'nnn non onn nno � L uur,k�111. �© JMIT®© m I cri t� Ch Ins.1 rum LAMM -�� ;,!AD IMMm y� lu:— - '(I •� 1 ' i A-5,I PLAN (PLAN A) i m m I ro to rn w LOT 5 - ROOF GR R PCMI'�tl.~ b J� A-5.3 m rn I {p ------------------ IBM rrw�..................... ........... ................. .... F .... ....::2. nou uun' 9233toQ Q� •:�:irs»:..::i�s:si y�r.::s:sa�::cunLa"r.{•'st"'#z "sr �:i::� goo m G1 I to Wn E_ _. �_ __._ .,--J i•i .—�...�_♦ ��r •ram. .. ... _-- �—�''�___.� �'�3 Ij i ul l MW IJ -- -------- - TOIT.I •. I! y�rJ RU -93 t 1 1 E I.�y.• E iCyy---- i T•Qli LCI � � � li.—f ..r �y i.r �xuc• j Ir.e..w• Y` A-6.1 LOT 6 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN (PLAN A -REVERSED) '.` I m U� LOT 6 - 5ECOND FLOOR PLAN m cn V VIiL9Y y}� • SrY •t r I C � 1 I r : " •� � awuv� 71 —a 1 a 1 Is TI •' _��--- —-L----1--=-------r-J, t7• .ate r A-6.3 (PLAN A r LOT b - ROOF PLAN -REVERSED) I6 r. I r• .Iff .cVl ial� f` -S 227 r71 22 V WUP11Ip \fir. • Wler1J�ORnt)aatolRnrfTa • q ei�r f�LTmm •nfr W w�w[KF r� f w{fl w�a.••s )w • rwr..... rrw f � a•..r..a� X hgr.�b�n iP P.rwbs•KY I fy M;..waR4tiAlTJrr Y4w1•ra�Mr�a.. a?A\•M ter... �.► ha ..•• ►w. o ••! al�.P. RLecM • M = \.rz- =1 r !a .rnf •.f1.1P Pf •MMP L+! !..sf. me ...s•rc.. w.lr iJ e. •a.e• R!f P •Iral.fa _ ,T . I • I � !j� ` �fS411]1llRl16• � • • •lf 1 FSEI� frt:. f h. 1 l jI 1 • r . i I � C l0I I 56ALE I_`O zz/', e �� •.....w.Xr..r•r OCrC.«�X.. Irc•.�. I�,M� �i y�IhX•iLw�T .��rMr•w lXV•'.M ..o.. L sM N1y1tYr•!e\ •P�•Iww•.M.aMIfV..L�w YYr•AYw+Pro P•'!•.yww �--� �'Ii.. •P~ am RYA+� blP wfW M<.'•we wrer•W�r.•R•V MvhYM.X \Xab•m•u• VIGIMYY !-TAP 1'X.•MIr'�.•�RV1r•)'i�a!•M•IrIM..r�t•�ys w(.✓rIwR�XT��•.w �A�.J 9 m I U3 Ch ID 1 It iC �, - -� !., __ _ Fau•._av j 1� ,•,•.:,.,, Y n� ' -'j :ax•.• _ S ��L t�� ;5". k+' s - IRS 1•R � �. I1 �LGTtdN 'A -A• - '1 a 1•1� i `_ FF"'p'K+ .cu[ti• _ ..{�arti. I- - '=u-�'� Div - tr�� _ ��54.4.•�� -�_ � �_.. _. 1 �y•Y F jf -CG7,ON: g-B' !a IT 1'fk iY '� �� !i �� i -.,.d.... rcYtt raI Kyl ... 7f •..qy- I` CCr71pN G-G ----------- [l"1 Yfllrla'r, � w .- I�{��Y �f��• w w ww w �Lwil'i w ~ ..M N.1 '..l � .'+t r.�' 1•r•.. wls '}j�"fatcs�R ►cam �y T wl �. w '.e. �s w. .a tir •r �.. � 5CGTION 'STA I.00' TI N 7A �•a0' SLG7,pN STA 9.00 `-CG7,GN °�7A _-00 5CG7ON $Ta .1•2a,�g _ ECG Q � 9.bfTYYTo L.GiRwP V 1-+t t ut 1 Y 4: Lr ors, k T FI E C I T Y O F PA1Ci10 CUCA.MONCA DATE: August 23, 2006 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Emily Cameron, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 - KAUT - A request to subdivide 2.99 acres of land into 6 single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue - APN: 0227-121-33 and 37. Related File: Design Review DRC2004-01198 was withdrawn July 26, 2006. This item was continued from July 12, 2006. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. A Proiect Density: 2 dwelling units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single -Family Homes; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single -Family Homes; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant Property; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre); East Avenue West - Single -Family Homes; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) General Plan Designations - Project Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. Site Characteristics: The site is located approximately 330 feet west of East Avenue and creates the cul-de-sac formation of "Street A," which intersects East Avenue. To the north and south, are existing single-family residences; to the east, are vacant parcels abutting East Avenue; and to the west, is a single-family home (Hippard Ranch). ANALYSIS 1 BACKGROUND: A. General: On July 12, 2006, the Planning Commission reviewed proposed Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 along with the development review of 6 single-family homes. Upon the review of both items at the public hearing, it was brought to the Commission's attention that one neighboring resident did not agree with the development of two-story homes on all 6 lots. A neighboring resident, Jim Banks, felt that the proposed homes were inconsistent with the historic nature of the Hippard Ranch. Because of this issue, the Planning Commission recommended that both items be EXHIBIT G E6--Pg70 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 - LILY KAUT #2 August 23, 2006 Page 2 continued until the applicant could meet with staff to see if a compromise could be agreed upon. The Planning Commission agreed to reconvene once the issues had been resolved to the satisfaction of staff. Approximately two weeks after the Planning Commission hearing, the applicant notified staff that they would proceed with the tract map only, in order to have a portion of the loan released. Staff then notified the abutting property owner of the applicant's intentions and began the process of re -notifying the neighbors within the 300-foot radius and received confirmation from the abutting property owner that the notice was received. B. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to construction noise, dust mitigation, and hydrology, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was re -advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Resp ctfully submitted, JamEd R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director DC:EC/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes dated July 12, 2006 Exhibit C - Letter from Jim Banks dated July 31, 2006 Exhibit D - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 E6—Pg71 T H E C I T Y O F RANC110 CUCAM ONGA Staff Report DATE- July 12, 2006 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Emily Cameron, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-01198 - LILY KAUT- The review of site plans and elevations for 6 single-family homes on 2.99 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue - APN: 0227-121-33 and 37. Related File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 - KAUT - A request to subdivide 2.99 acres of land into 6 single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue - APN, 0227-121-33 and 37. Related File: Design Review DRC2004-01198. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 2 dwelling units per acre, B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single -Family Homes; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single -Family Homes; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant Property; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre): East Avenue West - Single -Family Homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. Site Characteristics: The site is located approximately 330 feet west of East Avenue, and creates the cul-de-sac formation of "Street A," which intersects East Avenue. To the north E6—Pg72 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01198 & SUBTT16578 - LILY KAUT July 12, 2006 Page 2 and south are existing single-family residences, to the east are vacant parcels abutting East Avenue, and to the west is a single-family home (Hippard Ranch). ANALYSIS: A. General: The developer is proposing 6 single-family homes with a Tract Map in conjunction with the development. All proposed homes are two-story. The site will be developed under the Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The average lot size proposed is 15,696 square feet which meets or exceeds all Etiwanda Specific Plan requirements. The homes range from 4,400 to 4,742 square feet. Four of the 6 homes provide side -on garages. All homes include a 3-car garage. Elevations include extended porches, stacked stone, shingle siding, full window pop -outs, bay windows, and shutter details. The adjoining property owner to the west, Jim Banks, has met with staff and expressed his concern with the compatibility of two-story homes. Mr. Banks lives in a single -story home, an historic landmark, that is setback 115 feet from the shared property line with the proposed tract. The proposed homes are 38 feet from the property line; therefore, there will be a combined building separation of 153 feet which is significantly greater than normally would occur. For example, the minimum lot depth is 100 feet in this zone. There is dense vegetation, including a Eucalyptus windrow, separating and buffering Mr. Banks' home from the proposed project (see attached aerial photograph). The issue of single -story homes was raised at Design Review Committee (see below). The letter detailing the Banks' concerns was received July 3, 2006 and is attached as Exhibit 1. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Stewart, McPhail and, Coleman) reviewed the project on two separate dates, May 2, 2006 and May 16, 2006. The Committee requested adding a single -story plan on two or three of the lots. The applicant revised all homes to include window pop -outs, wainscoting, longer and wider pop -outs, and additional stacked stone with the use of wrap around porches. The Committee reviewed the revised project on May 16, 2006. The applicant informed the Committee that the homes were essentially pre -sold and none of whom wanted a single -story home. The Committee recommended approval (Exhibit F) on the basis that this is a small subdivision of custom homes designed for specific buyers. C. Technical Review Committee: The Grading and Technical Review Committees have reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the Standard Conditions attached. D. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held on January 5, 2005, at City Hall. A total of 5 residents attended, and were generally accepting of the layout and architectural style of the homes. E. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related E6—Pg73 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01198 & SUBTT16578 - LILY KAUT July 12, 2006 Page 3 to construction noise, dust mitigation, and hydrology, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration, A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract SUBTT16578 and Design Review DRC2004-01198 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration_ Respectfully submitted, 64 R. j%J'V Jam s R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:DCIbt Attachments: Exhibit - A - Site Plan/Location Map Exhibit - B - Grading Plan Exhibit - C - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit - D - Fence and Wall Plan Exhibit - E - Elevations Exhibit - F - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated May 2, 2006 and May 16, 2006. Exhibit - G - Initial Study Exhibit - H - Aerial Photograph Exhibit - I - Letter dated July 3, 2006 from Jim and Marsha Banks Draft Resolution of Approval for SUBTT16578 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-001198 E6—Pg74 RESOLUTION NO.06-65 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578, ON 2.99 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED WEST OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF VICTORIA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-121-33 AND 37. A. Recitals. 1. Lily Kaut filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of July 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing . 3. The applicant withdrew their related application for Design Review DRC2004-01198 on July 26, 2006. 4. On the 23rd day of August 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearings on July 12, 2006, and August 23, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street, with a street frontage of approximately 330 feet and lot depth of 331 feet and is presently vacant land; and b. The property to the north, south, and west of the subject site are single-family homes; the property to the east is vacant; and c. The application contemplates the subdivision of land into 6 lots that meet or exceed the standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. E6--Pg75 PLANNING COMMISSIOt RESOLUTION NO.06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 — LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. E6—Pg76 PLANNING COMMISSIOT ZSOLUTION NO. 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 — LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 3 d. Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753.5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753.5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753.5.) e. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based, is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The applicant shall provide written permission from the adjacent property owners for any off -site grading prior to issuance of Grading Permits. Engineering Department 1) Street "A" shall be improved in accordance with City "Local Street" standards including curb and gutters, a.c. pavement, street lights, street trees, sidewalk, drive approaches, traffic signs and stripings: The cul-de-sac bulb shall be per City Standard 111. The developer shall make a good faith effort to negotiate with owners of APNs: 0227-121-34 and 0227-121-36 regarding privately maintained landscaping and irrigation along their side yards on Street "A." Improvements are to be installed to the street curb. Plans for these areas will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department, with exception to street trees. If the owners are not willing to negotiate said improvements, install rockscape on the parkway, per City Standards. Provide drive approaches for the existing "not -a -part" residences to Street "A." The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the amount for installation of permanent public improvements from future development as it occurs on either side of the street fronting APNs: 0227-121-34 and 0227-121-36. E6—Pg77 PLANNING COMMISSI01' ESOLUTION NO.06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 — LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 4 If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2) The developer shall make a good faith effort to negotiate with owners of APNs: 0227-121-34 and 0227-121-36 an exchange of corner cutoffs dedications on East Avenue for sidewalks and curb returns on both corners. Remove or relocate the existing power pole located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and Street "A." 3) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Street "A" shall be undergrounded from the first pole off -site most westerly on Street "A" to the first pole off -site Street "A" on East Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. All services crossing Street "A" shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request reimbursement agreement to recoverone-half the City adopted amount for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on either side of the street fronting APNs: 0227-121-34 and 0227-121-36. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shallterrninate. 4) Development within Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 8 is required to install master plan storm drains and interim basins. Interim Basin No. 5 and the storm drain in East Avenue were both constructed by Tract 15912, south of the subject tract. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 can satisfy its condition to install storm drains through the payment of fees. However, those fees do not cover the interim basin. The developer of Tract 15912 is eligible to request reimbursement for the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc.). They must request said reimbursement within 6 months of the public storm drain facilities being accepted by the City. Therefore, this development will need to deposit $5,000 per gross acre in Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 with the City for the purpose of reimbursing the developer of Tract 15912. If reimbursement is not requested within 6 months of public improvement acceptance, the deposit will be returned to developer of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. 5) An in -lieu fee as reimbursement for the previously undergrounded overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except the 66 KV electrical) on the opposite side of East Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of Building Permits. The amount shall be one-half of the actual cost of undergrounding of said utilities fronting East Avenue 66-foot frontage. The reimbursement fee is unavailable at this time, since Tract 16189 is still under construction. E6—Pg78 PLANNING COMMISSIOK ESOLUTION NO.06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 — LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 5 6) Reimburse adjacent developers for oversizing of interim drainage facilities. 7) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with the application for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete. Include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for technical plan check. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. E6—Pg79 PLANNING COMMISSIOi RESOLUTION NO.06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 — LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 6 • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occur as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric orclean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction -Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather -stripping - Cultural Resources i) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. E6—Pg80 PLANNING COMMISSIOI ESOLUTION NO. 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 — LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 7 • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1 } The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RW QCB) daily to reduce Fine Particulate E6—Pg81 PLANNING COMMISSION ESOLUTION NO.06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 — LILY KAUT August 23. 2006 Page 8 Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM•,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soik-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce poflutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. E6—Pg82 PLANNING COMMISSION ESOLUTION NO. 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 — LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 9 Post -Construction Activities 5) The developer shall implementthe BMPs identified in the WaterQuality Management Plan prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc. dated December 10, 2004, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit, Noise 1 } Prior to issuance of Grading and Building Permits, the applicant shall submit an acoustical study prepared by licensed acoustical engineer analyzing traffic noise impacts upon the project site and making recommendations for mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards. 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall. hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building E6—Pg83 PLANNING COMMISSION .iESOLUTJON NO.06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 — LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 10 Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. if noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwelfings, 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2006. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Pam* Ste(vart. Chairman ATTEST: n- &t�! J qT es R. Troyer, Secretaly I, James R. Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed_ and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 2006, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCPHAIL, MUNOZ, STEWART NONE FLETCHER, MACIAS E6—Pg84 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 and DRC2004-01198 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the *(Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Report) for the above -listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 E6-Pg85 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBTT16578 AND DRC2004-01198 July 12, 2006 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8_ Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the Cib/s MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. E6—Pg86 m cro w V MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART ill) Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 and Development Review DRC2004-01198 Applicant: Lily Kaut Initial Study Prepared by: Emily Cameron Associate Planner Date: May 31, 2006 Hillilgation Meas ures No. I Re5ponsible Manitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Ar-flon for Monitoring Pr,-quency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance ,�-.. J C Review of Plans A/C ; .. 214 Ali construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shalt ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Review of plans C developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low -emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/D 214 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: ■ Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 1 of 8 m -10 to 00 00 Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring FrequencyMitigation Date /initials Non -Compliance • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of 80 C Review of Plans A10 2f4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. ■ Dispose of surplus excavated material in BD C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BD C During A 4 by the City if sill is carried over to adjacent public Construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. ■ Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., BD C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Construction Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO Q During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A/C 4 soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Pine Particulate Matter (PM1tl) emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and 80 C During A/C 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel -powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. All residential and commercial structures small be BO C Review of Plans A 4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 2 of 8 m M i cn GO to Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method iDf Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /initials Non -Compliance All residential and commercial structures shall be CP C Review of Plans A/C 213 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. RN If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities and to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: ■ Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of AID 314 sites from demolition or significant modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. ■ Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of A/D 314 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO D Review of AID 3/4 archaeological heritage. Report ■ Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of AID 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. ■ Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of AJD 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation. and Report proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 3 of 8 m rn -a cn LO 0 Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring FrequencyMitigation Date /initials Non -Compliance If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossil) CP B Review of A/D 4 are encountered before or during grading, the developer Report shall retain a qualified paleontologist to conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP 9 Review of AID 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. ■ Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for CP f] Review of D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to Report an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). ■ Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Construction RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 4 of 8 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Ac. -.uency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions Construction from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BORE C During A A RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or. more to reduce PM10 emissions. mom .,, Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on -site shall BOXE C Review of Plans A1C 4 be integrated into the design of the project where During appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize Construction runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, pre -cast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO BICID Review of Plans AIC 214 shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 5 of 8 Mitigation No. Monitoring Timing of Method ofVerified Sanctions • Implementing • •Monitoring Frequency Verification• Datellnitials Non -Compliance An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO BICID Review of Plans A/C 214 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on - site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. During construction. to remove pollutants, street BO B/CID Review of Plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in BO BIC/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan shall be prepared prior to submittal of .Building and Safety Division, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/CID Review of Plans A/C 214 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides- Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. R • Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for ImplementingMitigation -. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 214 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NO]) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Prior to issuance of grading and building permits, the CP/BO B Review of Plans NO PJ4 applicant shall submit an acoustical study prepared by and during licensed acoustical engineer analyzing traffic noise inspection impacts upon the project site and making recommendations for mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards. Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A1G 214 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7of8 Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. BO The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP as possible in the first phase. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the CP hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, Cn including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations C During NC I Construction C During A Construction - During A Construction 14 4 4 COD - Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development At A - On -site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies 1 Plans) 4 - Slop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP 7 - Citation 8of8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT ##: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-01198 SUBJECT: SIX LOTS AND RESIDENTIAL HOMES APPLICANT: LILY KAUT LOCATION: EAST AVENUE/SOUTH OF VICTORIA ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents. officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 06-66, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealedlstamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval, No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and cotors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. SC-1-05 1 Completion Date 1 1_ 1 1� _I 1 1 1_ I \PLANNINGIFINALIPLNGC0MM12006 Res & Stf Rpt1DRC2004-01198Stdcond 7-12 doc E6—Pg95 Project No.ORC2004-01198 Completion Date 2, Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _I 1 State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 3. Revised site plans and building e!evations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/ 1 submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits, j 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for f 1 1 consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading. tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5- Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and app'icable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers. AC condensers, etc., shall be 1_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete _I or masonry wails, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 7- Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the 1 1 adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified to a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination 9. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter, 10. Construct block walls between homes (i.e along Interior side and rear property lines), rather than 1 1 wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 11. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood 1 1 gates. Acceptable materials include, bvt are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 12. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 1 1_ 13, For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each 1 1 support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two'/Z-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shard be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing- Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 14- On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 1 1 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees. shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2 I;IPLANNJNG%F$NAL%PLNGCOMM12006 Res & 5tf Rpt1DRC2004-0119Bstdcond 7-12 doc E6—Pg96 Project No.DRC2004-01198 Completion Date D. Building Design All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Details shall be included in building plans. E. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 4. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting 5. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shal' be continuously maintained by the developer. 6. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. F. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $ 4A5? nn prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit, 3 1 /- 1 1_ 1 1___ _/ /— / 1� I IPLANNINGTINALIPLNGCOMM 2006 Res & SIf Rpt'.DRC2004-01198Stdcond 7-12 doc E6—Pg97 Project No.DRC2004-01198 Completion Date G. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U.S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi -family residential, developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting_ The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE; ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. General Requirements 2. 3, 4_ 5 Submit five complete sets of p'ans including the following'. a. Site/Plot Plan. b- Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan. d_ Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan. - Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics. underground diagrams, water and waste diagram. sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g Planning Department Project Number (i.e , SUBTT #, SUBTPM#, DRC #) clearly identified on the outside of all plans_ Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department slaff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project fife number (i.e., DRC2004-01198). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Bui'ding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts_ 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School 4 1,1 1_I 1�/ 1_1 1_I 1�1 I: PLANNINGTINALIPLNGCOMM12006 Res 8 Stf Rpt%DRC2004-01198Stdcond 7-12 doc E6—Pg98 Project No DRC2004-01198 Com letion Date Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map 1 1 recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday I 1_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. J. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances 1 1_ considering use, area, and fire -resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 1 1� K. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading 1 1� Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to 1 1_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the 1 1 time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, 1 1 submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for 1 1 existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. 6. If human remains are discovered on -site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall 1_I occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Cade Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. L. Additional Requirements/Comments APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 2. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or —1—1 noted on the final map. 5 t:1PLANNINGWINALTLNGCOMM12006 Res 8 Stf RptIDRC2004-01198Stdcond 7-12.doc E6—Pg99 Project No,DRC2004-01198 Completion Date 3. All existing easements lying with-n future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. N. Street Improvements 1, All public improvements (interia: streets drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks street lights, and street trees 2. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except. that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than.95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to comp:'etion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 3_ Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb 8, Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Street "A" X X X X I X X 4_ Improvement Plans and Construction - a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles and traffic signal plans shalt be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shal! be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of 13CR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes- 1} Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. 6 _/ I _I 1 1 1_ t:IPLANNINGIFINALIPLNGC01`AM12006 Res 8 Sif Rpt0RC2004-01198Stdcond 7-12 doc E6—Pg 100 Froyect No.DRC2004-01198 Completion Date Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction, Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check_ 5. Provide a minimum of 3-inch conduit for future fiber optic use on all streets with connection through the parkway to each lot or pprce: (fiber -to -the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and locat-on of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits or final map approval whichever comes first. 6. Instal I street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)," Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement puns The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing I Size Qty. STREET "A" CERSIS CANADENSIS EASTERN ROSEBUD 5' 25' Q.C, 15gaI Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 0. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be Fled with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. P. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 1 1� 11� 1^I� _I 1 1 1_ I XPLANNINGWINALIPLNGCOMM12006 Res 8 Sif Rp1-.DRC2004-0119BStdcond 7-12 doc E6—Pg101 Project No,DRC2004-01198 Cam teWn Date Q. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). Rancho Cucamonga Fire Pfotection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision o- prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. R. General Requirements and Approvals Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline. Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City cover;ng the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance If no map is involved. Prior to the issuance of building perm its, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED s 1APLANNI'NGTINALTLNGCOMM12006 Res & Stf RptIDRC2004-011985tdcond 7-12.doc E6—Pg102 Rancho Cucamonga Fire PrOLection District 1 i Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS March 29, 2006 Kaut Tract (6) SFR West side of East Ave south of Victoria SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-01198 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5. A minimum of forty -feet (40') from any building. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is 2,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20- pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III -A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. E6--Pg 103 FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel snap: Annexation of the parcel map intc...ic Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. ChronoloLyical Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 2. 3. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. E6ZQg104 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPAR1 u NT A Date: January 28, 2015 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From- Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner Subject: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207 - PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC - A request to construct 6 single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved 6-lot subdivision on 2.99 acres in the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 500 feet south of the Victoria Avenue. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578.; APN: 022712133. On August 23, 2006, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Design Review DRC2014-00207 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. BACKGROUND: On August 23, 2006, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract 16578 for the subdivision of 2.99 acres into 6 single-family lots. The final map subsequently recorded in September 2014, the project site was sold, and the applicant has submitted a design review application for the project site. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan East - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan West - Single -Family Residences; Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Very Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The project site is located approximately 330 feet west of East Avenue, and situated around a cul-de-sac extension of the existing public street, Owens Court (Exhibit A). To the north, south, east, and west are existing single-family residences. The project site EXHIBIT H E6—>s105 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00207 — PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC January 28, 2015 Page 2 is currently vacant as the previous single-family home on -site has been demolished. Vegetation on -site consists of declining fruit trees, shrubs, small trees, and regrowth stumps. The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately 1,343 feet and 1,335 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS; A. General: The project proposes the development of 6 single-family residences within a previously approved subdivision of 6 lots. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all subdivision improvements prior to the issuance of building permits for the residences. The lots are situated on the terminus of a cul-de-sac and range in size from 14,315 square feet (Lot 6) to 18,317 square feet (Lot 4) (Exhibit A and D). All lots are conventional in design allowing for conventional house plotting. The design and placement of the proposed homes complies with all Development Standards (Table 5-2) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan_ The two lots on the western project boundary at the end of the cul-de-sac (Lots 3 and 4) will have one-story homes, while the 4 lots on the eastern end of the project site (Lots 1, 2, 5, and 6) will have two-story homes (Exhibit B). This mix of single and two-story homes is consistent with Section 17.122.010 of the Development Code that requires a minimum of 25 percent of the proposed houses to be single -story. The single -story floor plans range in size from 4,067 to 4,110 square feet and the two-story floor plans range in size from 4,035 to 4,146 square feet, There are two distinct floor plans, plus a reverse of each building foot print, and four architectural styles (American Farmhouse, Craftsman, Bungalow, and Spanish) to provide substantial variety in project design (Exhibit C). This includes Lot 1 — American Farmhouse, Lot 2 — Craftsman, Lot 3 — Bungalow, Lot 4 — Craftsman, Lot 5 — American Farmhouse, and Lot 6 — Spanish. Each house will have a weal -articulated footprint/floor plan and unit profile. The footprints and profiles of each house are varied and there is a substantial amount of movement in the wall plane and roof line. Projections such as prominent chimneys and dormers and a mix of hip and gable roofs will provide additional interest in the profile of each house. There are also architectural details such as corbels, shutters, wall -mounted light fixtures, decorative trim around the windows, molding along the top of the stone veneer wainscots_ and decorative garage and entry doors Overall, the applicant has provided variety in architectural style, building design, unit placement, building massing, proportion and scale to distinguish each of the proposed styles from one another so that no two homes look alike. The project site contains a number of trees including declining fruit trees, privet shrubs, seedling trees, regrowth stumps (i.e:, sucker growth), and foundation plantings around the location of the previously existing residence. Staff evaluated the project site for compliance with Section 17.16.080 of the Development Code relating to Tree Removal Permits, and determined that a Tree Removal Permit is not necessary. This is because fruit and nut trees are exempt, Privets are shrubs that are not protected, and regrowth stumps have already been excessively trimmed and are not sustainable. There are five (5) different trees on site two (2) Japanese Black Pine, one (1) Palo Verde, and two (2) Allepo Pines that were evaluated for their potential significance. A heritage tree is "any tree in excess of thirty feet (30') In height and having a single trunk diameter at breast height (DBH) of twenty inches (20") or more as measured four and a half feet (4.5) from ground level," None of these five (5) trees meet both E6—Pg 106 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00207 -- PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC January 28, 2015 Page 3 height and the trunk size criteria to establish them as heritage trees requiring a Tree Removal Permit so they may be removed. B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at St. Clare of Assisi Episcopal Church on October 21, 2014 (Exhibits E). Several property owners from the surrounding community attended. Although none of them had any specific objections to the project, there were questions relating to the placement of single and two-story homes, the timing of development, as well as several questions regarding nearby projects. C. Design Review Committees: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger) reviewed the application on November 4, 2014 (Exhibit F). The Committee reviewed the project design and recommended minor architectural modifications to two elevations (for Lots 4 and 6). The applicant revised building elevations and submitted for additional Committee review. On December 2, 2014 the Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger) reviewed the revised project submittal on the Consent Calendar and recommended approval. D. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on August 23, 2006, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map 16578. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of this project based on the following: • No substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; • No substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; • No new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; • No new or different mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts; and • There have been no substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Negative Declaration. All mitigation measures in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration will be implemented with the project. E6—Pg107 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00207 —PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC January 28, 2015 Page 4 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dail Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received Respectfully submitted, -b-0 Candyce Burnett Planning Director CB;TGIJs Attachments'. Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Elevation, Floor, and Roof Plans Exhibit D - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit E - Neighborhood Meeting Sign -In Sheets (October 21, 2014) Exhibit F - Design Review Committee Action Comments, November4, 2014 and December 2, 2014 Exhibit G - SUBTT16578 Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 06-65 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2014-00207 E6—Pg108 RESOLUTION NO. 15-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT 6 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION (TENTATIVE TRACT 16578) WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET SOUTH OF VICTORIA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS 1N SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-121-33. A. Recitals 1. Plaza Developments East Avenue filed an application for Design Review DRC2014- 00207, as described In the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. Section 17.20.070 of the Development Code requires Planning Commission review of residential projects with 5 or more dwellings. 3. On the 28th day of January 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing an the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it Is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of thls Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on January 28, 2015, Including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a site located at the western terminus of Owens Court, west of East Avenue and south of Victoria Avenue. The project site is approximately 331 feet deep (east to west) and 330 feet (north to south) with an overall area of approximately 2.99 acres; and b. To the north, south, east, and west of the project site are existing residences; and c. The project proposes the construction of 6 single-family residence on each lot of a 6-lot subdivision with access onto a future public street (Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578) that was previously approved by the Planning Commission on August 23, 2006 and subsequently recorded on September 9, 2014; and E6—Pg109 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-04 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207 -- PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC January 28, 2015 Page 2 d, The applicant proposes two (2) distinct footprints — Plans 1 and 2 — and reverse footprints of each for a total of four (4) footprints. The number of available footprints complies with Figure 5-45 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and e. Plan A on Lots 1, 2, 5, and 6 will be two-story residences, and Plan B on Lots 3 and 4 will be one-story residences. The mix of one- and two-story homes is consistent Development Code Development Code Section 17.122.010(A)(1)(8), which requires that at least twenty-five percent (25%) of all single-family detached units In any single-family residential development consisting of four (4) or more units to be single -story units; and f. The project will comply with Section 5.42.606 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan that requires that 50 percent of the garages to be oriented or situated in a manner that minimizes the visual presence of the garage. A total of 4 residences will have side facing garage doors; and g. The proposed houses comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described In Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The architecture of each house is consistent with the general design requirements outlined In the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and h. The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the proposed project on December 2, 2014. 3, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district In which the site is located. The construction of 6 units is consistent with the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, which permits the development of single-family homes at a density of 2 to 4 dwelling units per acre and the underlying General Plan designation is Low Residential; and b. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and c. The proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements In the vicinity, The project site will be developed In accordance with the previously approved subdivision map to support new residences; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it Is located and the expectations of the community; and 4. Based upon the facts and information contained In the application, together with all written and oral reports, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the Clty's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated NIDgative Declaration on August 23, 2006 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. Pursuant to CEQA E6—Pg110 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-04 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207 — PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC January 28, 2015 Page 3 Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe Impacts on the environment; (11) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental Impacts; or (ill) new Important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Design Review DRC2014-00207, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe Impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. SUBTT16578 provided forthe subdivision of 2.99 acres into 6 lots. Design Review DRC2014-00207 provides for the design review of the 6 homes within that approved subdivision. The Planning Commission further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Design Review DRC2014-00207. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: j2� )cjp4, Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: — �--o Candy tr mett, Secretary 1, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2015, by the following vote -to -wit: E6—Pg111 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-04 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207 - PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC January 28, 2015 Page 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS; FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAACA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. WIMBERLY ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS, NONE E6-Pg112 0 Conditions of Approval Ho einelae Community Development Department Project M DRC2014-00207 Project Name - Location: - 022712133-0000 Project Type; Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 1. Approval is for the development of 6 single-family residences In conjunction with a previously approved 6-lot subdivision of approximately 2-99 acres within the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 500 feet south of the Victoria Avenue - APN= 022712133. 2. The development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Low (L) Residential District as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3. Front yard and comer side yard landscaping and Irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Plan, This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 4. A detailed landscape and Irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscapes architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 5. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 6. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 7. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No, 15-**, Conditions of Approval. and all environmental mitigations associated with SUBTT16578 shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheets are for Information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealedistamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 8. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not Issued or the approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted - Printed 1/1512015 WWW.C1ty0fRC us Eb—Pgi 13 A Project #; DRC2014-00207 Project Name: Location: - 022712133-0000 Project Type- Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - A. Planning Department 9. Model homes shall require the review of a separate Temporary Use Permit (Model Home) and fee prior to the submittal of documents for plan check and construction, Note, Parking in the street will not be permitted for this purpose. A temporary off-street parking area that complies with all applicable parking requirements will be required and must be shown on the plans for this permit. 10, All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 (including all Mitigation Measures Identified in the associated Mitigated Negative Declaration) shall apply, 11. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, ali other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans In effect at the lime of Building Permit Issuance. 12, Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 13. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which Include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on file In the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Etlwanda Specific Plan, 14. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 15. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, building, etc.). 16. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 17. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. Return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department, 18. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. 19. The development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Low (L) Residential District as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 20. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes_ Panted: VI&M,s www.C4ofRc_us Pepe 2 of 0 b6—Pg114 J Project #: DRC2014-00207 Project Name: Location: - 022712133-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. Ennineerino Services Department 1. Ail pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 06-65 approving Tentative Tract Map 16578 shall apply. C. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit 1. All structures will be required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. Fire hydrants shall be Installed per RCFPD Standard 5-10. D. BuIldina ang Safety Servlcr& De artment 1. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Archkect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly Identified on the outside of all plans. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit Issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Annexation of the parcel: Annexation of the parcel Into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or Building Permits. 6. The house, garage and any other structures as required must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. 7. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistive requirements. B. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 9. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 10. Construction activity shall occur in accordance with the standards as stated In Chapter 17.66.050 D-4 of the Development Code. Printed: 1115I2015 www.Cityo1RC.us Page S or 6 E6—Pg115 J Project #: DRC2014-00207 Project Name: Location: - 022712133-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- D. Building and Safety Services Department 11. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit Issuance. 12. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 13. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. E. Grading Section 1. Grading of the subject property shall be In accordance with current adopted California Building Code. City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan (s) shall be In substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer- B. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permlt from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8, A drainage study showing a 100year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to Issuance of a grading permit, All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. www.CllyG Rc.us Printed. 9l15R0 i 5 Page 4 of 5 E6—Pg 116 0 Project #: DRC2014-00207 Project Name: Location: - 022712133-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 9. it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a deta€I(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 12. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 13. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 14. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 15. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 16. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit. 17. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and sweles where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 18. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 19. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 20. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 21. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permlf. Primed 115=15 www.CftyofRC us Page 5 of B E6—Pg117 FA Project #: DRC2014-00207 Project Name: Location: - 022712133-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 22, Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting, The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting Is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: €) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; III) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Solis Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 23. Prior to the Issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 24. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 25. Reciprocal access easements for storm water treatment devices within the public right-of-way and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC$R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit Said CCBR's and/or deeds shall be included In the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. Printed 1115=15 www.CltyofRC.us Page a of 5 Efi—Pg 118 RESOLUTION NO. 17-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, A REQUEST TO MODIFY DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207 TO REVISE THE PLOTTING AND ARCHITECTURE FOR 6 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 16578) WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, ON OWENS COURT, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF VICTORIA AVENUE - AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNS: 0227-842-01, -02, -03, -04, -05 AND -06. A. Recitals. 1. Owens Court Estates, LLC. filed an application for the approval of Design Review Modification DRC2016-00338 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of May, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded the hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports and public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a site located at the western terminus of Owens Court, west of East Avenue and south of Victoria Avenue. The project site is approximately 331 feet deep (east to west) and 330 feet (north to south) with an overall area of approximately 2.99 acres; and b. To the north, south, east, and west of the project site are existing residences; and C. The project proposes the construction of 6 single-family residence on each lot of a 6-lot subdivision with access onto a future public street (Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578) that was previously approved by the Planning Commission on August 23, 2006 and subsequently recorded on September 9, 2014; and d. The project proposes to replace the floor plan and architectural design of the houses that were originally going to be constructed within the subject tract (Related file: Design Ef —Pg 119 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-40 DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2016-00338 — OWENS COURT ESTATES, LLC. May 10, 2017 Page 2 Review DRC2014-00207) thatwas previously approved by the Planning Commission on January 28, 2015; and e. The applicant proposes three (3) distinct footprints — Residence 1, 2 and 3 -- and a total of two (2) elevations per footprint. The number of available footprints and elevations complies with Figure 5-45 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and f. Residence 1 on Lots 2 and 5 will be two-story residences. Residence 2 on Lots 1 and 6 and Residence 3 on lots 3 and 4 will be one-story residences. The mix of one- and two-story homes is consistent Development Code Development Code Section 17,122.010(A)(1)(a), which requires that at least twenty-five percent (25%) of all single-family detached units in any single-family residential development consisting of four (4) or more units to be single -story units; and g. The proposed houses comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The architecture of each house is consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and h. The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the proposed project on April 18, 2017. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The construction of 6 units is consistent with the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, which permits the development of single-family homes at a density of 2 to 4 dwelling units per acre and the underlying General Plan designation is Low Residential; and b. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, including setbacks, building height and lot coverage; and C. The proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site will be developed in accordance with the previously approved subdivision map to support new residences; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration in August 23, 2006 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. Pursuant to CEQA E6—Pg120 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-40 DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2016-00338 — OWENS COURT ESTATES, LLC. May 10, 2017 Page 3 Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (1) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Design Review Modification DRC2016-00338, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The proposed project involves a modification to the floor plan and architecture for the houses throughout the tract as previously approved through Design Review DRC2014-00207. The proposal does not change the layout of the tract, or the number of homes to be developed. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. The proposed project is consistent with the previous approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 for a 6-lot residential subdivision, in that the project contains a total of 6 houses, one house per lot. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Design Review Modification DRC2016- 00338. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the attached Conditions of Approval incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary E6—Pg121 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1740 DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2016-00338 -- OWENS COURT ESTATES, LLC. May 10, 2017 Page 4 1, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS' NOES: COMMISSIONERS' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E6—Pg122 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: DRC2016-00338 Project Name: 6-lot product modification Location: 6956 EAST AVE - 022784201-0000 Project Type: Design Review Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for modification of the floor plans and architecture in conjunction with the development of six (6) single-family residences located within Tract 16578 on Owens Court, west of East Avenue and south of Victoria Avenue - APNs: 0227-842-01, -02, -03, -04, -05 and -06. 2. All conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 (including all Mitigation Measures identified in the associated Mitigated Negative Declaration) shall apply. 3. All conditions of approval for Design Review DRC2014-00207 shall apply. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 06-65 and 15-05 approving Tentative Parcel Map 16578 and approving DRC2014-00207 respectively will continue to apply. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Design Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural and Energy calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes. The new structure is required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required for new structures, Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 06-65 and 15-05 approving Tentative Parcel Map 16578 and approving DRC2014-00207 respectively will continue to apply. 2. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. Printed 411812017 www City ofRC us E6—Pg123 Project #'. DRC2016-00338 Project Name: 6-lot product modification Location: 6956 EAST AVE - 022784201-0000 Project Type: Design Review Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 3. The current civil engineer of record, Lucinda E. Hackett of LEH & Associates, is proposing to use signed and sealed construction drawing sheets from the previous civil engineer of record, Julio N . Loza of JNL Consulting Civil Engineers. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the current civil engineer of record shall obtain in writing from the previous civil engineer of record permission to use those construction documents/plans prepared by the previous civil engineer of record. A copy of the letter to use the previous plans shall be placed on the title sheet of the permitted grading set of plans. Printed 4-18f2017 www.CilyofRC.us Page 2 of 2 E6—Pg 124 r^ STAFF REPORT DATE: May 10, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Plann INITIATED BY: Dominick Perez, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557 - W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS - A request to subdivide a parcel of 42,150 square feet into three (3) parcels in conjunction with the development of three (3) single-family residential homes within the Low (L) Residential District located at 9757 Liberty Sheet - APN: 0201-251-56. Related file: Minor Design Review DRC2014- 00700. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 15 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15315) exemption, which covers residential subdivisions of four or fewer parcels in urbanized areas. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 - W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS - A request to develop three (3) single-family residential homes in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map 19557 on a parcel of 42,150 square feet within the Low Residential (L) District located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 3 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) exemption, which covers new construction of up to three single- family residences in urbanized areas. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: Approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557 and Minor Design Review DRC2014-00700 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: 3.1 du/acre B. Site Characteristics: The project site is a 42,150 square foot parcel in a single-family residential neighborhood located northeast of the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue at 9757 Liberty Street. The dimensions of the parcel are 130.99 feet from east to west and 334 feet from north to south. The site contains an unoccupied single-family E7—E8 Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENT.. ENT TIVE TRACT MAP SUBTPM19557 AND MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 10, 2017 Page 2 residence. There are a combination of wood fences and block walls along the east, west and south perimeters of the site. Street improvements along the north end of the property consist of street, curb and gutter, cobble parkway, sidewalk and an existing driveway. The site is generally level with an elevation change of about 16 feet between the northwest and southeast corners of the property. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Single -Family Residence (unoccupied) Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) Low (L) Residential District North Single -Family Residences Low Residential 2-4 du/ac) Low L Residential District South Single -Family Residences Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) Low (L) Residential District ast Single -Family Residences Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) Low (L) Residential District West Single -Family Residences Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) Low (L) Residential District ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the subject property into three (3) parcels and construct one single-family house on each lot. The subdivision will result in a generally conventional lot (Lot 1) with two (2) flag lots (Lots 2 and 3) behind it (as seen from the street). The conventional lot will have an area of 11,492 square feet while the two flag lots will have areas of 13,303 square feet and 17,355 square feet (Lots 2 and 3, respectively). Per the Development Code, the Low Residential (L) District allows for a maximum of four (4) dwelling units per acre and requires a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet and an average lot size of 8,000 square feet. Therefore, the subdivision is in compliance with these requirements. Lot 1 has a width of 91 feet and a depth of 134 feet. The "buildable" part of Lot 2 has a depth of 110 feet and a width of 100 feet while that of Lot 3 has a depth of 130.99 feet and a width of 100 feet. To allow vehicular and pedestrian access to Liberty Street, the flag lots will be connected to it by separate "poles", i.e. elongated sections of each lot. The poles for Lots 2 and 3 will be 20-feet wide by 110.4-feet long and 20-feet wide by 211-feet long, respectively. The required width and depth of lots within the Low Residential (L) District is 65 feet and 100 feet and the required flag lot frontage is 20 feet. The subdivision will also meet these requirements. The project also involves the construction of one, 2-story house on each lot. The floor area of the houses will range in size from 4,355 square feet (Lot 2) to 4,746 square feet (Lot 1). According to the table below, there are a total of two floor plans that will be used. All of the houses will have a three -car garage. The houses and site layout conform to the technical standards required in the Low Residential (L) District including setbacks, building height, and lot coverage. E7—E8 Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTPM19557 AND MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 10, 2017 Page 3 Lot No. Of Story Floor Plan Type 151 Floor SF 211 Floor SF Total Living Area (SF) Garage (SF) 1 2 A 2,521.74 2,225.06 4,746.80 775.20 2 2 B-1 2,488.02 1,867.17 4,355.19 720.24 3 2 B-2 2,767.52 1,975.84 4,743.36 720.24 The houses will also comply with the design guidelines specified within Section 17.122.010 of the Development Code, which require 360-degree architecture (Exhibit H). The architectural styles that are proposed to be used are Craftsman and Ranch. The Craftsman elevation type, which will be used on Lot 1, will have stucco -finished walls with stone veneer and horizontal siding, front porch with battered columns, concrete tile roofing and decorative garage doors and windows. The Ranch elevation type, which will be used on Lots 2 and 3, will have stucco walls with stone veneer, horizontal siding (Lot 3), gable accents, concrete tile roofing and decorative garage) doors and windows. I B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Vineyard Junior High at 6440 Mayberry Avenue on January 18, 2017. Several property owners from the surrounding community attended. Although none of them had any specific objections to the project, there were questions and concerns relating to the placement and design of 2-story homes, the timing of development, as well as the demolition of the existing house onsite (Exhibit J). Staff indicated to the residents that the questions and concerns addressed at the neighborhood meeting would be taken into consideration moving forward. C. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Wimberly, Macias, and Smith) reviewed the proposal on April 18, 2017. (Exhibit K). No significant issues were identified and the Committee accepted the proposal as submitted. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the proposal on April 18, 2017. No significant issues were identified and their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval E. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under Classes 3 and 15 exemptions under State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and 15315 (Minor Subdivisions) because the project involves the construction of three (3) single-family houses and a subdivision of one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels, respectively. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the E7—E8 Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTPM119557 AND MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 10, 2017 Page 4 City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. For example, the Land Use element within the General Plan (Chapter 2) encourages the facilitation of sustainable and attractive infill development that compliments surrounding neighborhoods. This proposed residential project willlI complement the surrounding neighborhood as it is compatible with the adjacent homes and will replace an existing abandoned single-family residende that is currently under -maintained and aesthetically has a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Furthermore, the subdivision and use are in compliance with the Development Code standards and requirements. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date no comments, other than what was discussed at the neighborhood meeting were received in response to the public hearing notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Tentative Parcel Map 19557 Exhibit C - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit D - Block Wall Plan Exhibit E - Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan Exhibit F - Cut and Fill Map Exhibit G - Site Plan Exhibit H - Elevation, Floor, Roof Plans and 3-D Renderings Exhibit I - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit J - Neighborhood Meeting Notes and Sign -In Sheets.(January 18, 2017) Exhibit K - Design Review Committee Action Comments (April 18, 2017) Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Design Review Modification DRC2014-00700 CB:DP/Is E7—E8 Pg4 m x CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SITE UTILIZATION MAP FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19557 u �NII SHEMNGE% ,EN..mEo.R�w. rRn.�w.,w..:nEaaa..auaEAaN ..a, vrerw..w.ian..s.wo,RcrGna�anc�ou wsm imsszawa..>,werw.s GEtE NOTES wo,[CTm[aR cwruwroxG aw v.s�rn ivasssows vwcFL rluuaex sovevw aWNEWAPRICMR; uw¢YNwFNrEsmrem,ue awnn�cuurcx:0.ueim CML ENGNEER: 06�iva19. EC ViWO.Go M4,A IwoI_�0. mwre ,I N Q w»ssG� a X W �ro sss�e+rs f�rzw; rrwcvrs zm-rro ors mxrAsoaoo Aan oznzeszs0000 Am ozo`zesaovm e ee W vwAU zaE ra. r3-r dvAq LxE rl Ita [wAU z�m'rns n3orxrs Ara mnzsfso-woo xeE w. e: a urw V I m - 00 LUaoml-e"s sm�rvs rss¢rrz � zac w. lz-+aaAq Aan ozm-amsea000 :mE rd. R-d tlYAU CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19557 ern�omtx aF�0000 fue ra Ixe oWAU LOT2 LOT3[I 17,355 SF,1 i VEIw I1�ATi F�TYi rlEsmvts Ava ozv�amef AQ ern mmeu+Az-aoa ... LYE 14 4M dllAU 1 ll W. 2 CWAU FASEIAEMS: mr na m.�, ucim�i'ovr v � P ., rc n,m v, n e.+iu a nw wr+t aem.a e.ww..o cmnrvo xmznrs Arn azorxiar0000 ZVC r8. �2d W'AU Em .n wsar+rs Avn ozowovaz-0000 zaE m (z-e GYAIJ r>Srro rssovns AM umzerezmoo zvE m.:w wrm cxs.w rrmzrts Asn ®Fao6a)govo , 'a ' LOLL ' w 11,482 SF" zr�resmns � _. zmE ru. vw auno I zac �io�mw Avem,e .m..z w�p AFA'rt�w rco .vm m u.wa.rav �rro oznwm.o-0000 u G �,.G ins APn OMI<W}PC0.tl ��rs xuE ra cs ovAU 142N UWACI p 1 u � J �I erfA omwasza0000 l }aL to fN wuPU CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - CROSS SECTION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19557 OWNEWAPPLICANT: BENCHMARK ,". nrTEINE, NINO .I.. uc Nl[ - 11e1 OCIA ."IMER � CA RANCHO CNGUOxG CA Et D3A AaCwi6nLIT AA 6 Hi NADEµ EVIL ENGINEER: LEGAL OESCRIP➢ON Es N NNS T.w LSTE Ti ED i P PARCEL ass roo a elw; Nory a or RANCHO n cn ca':3. °sin nry TEL 0 0BT STATE o,C}sMxn AS ICWNDIC POE 11 Or - 6 Iw700 n1 ii cE or THE SCHN" E ar EAo CONNE, OF BEARINGS EARTIrWORK EEANNOS ME BASED ON THE CHNTSHLE Or....... Or IIBERTV STREET N ONES CC E PER III.. -,... ,O C Ev PARCEL MAP O15s63 BOEK TO EMS IP IC SHNINve6[ .'. C. (1Si) 1.1 ENANrtO[5 SHO x HCESION 1 ON� THE CONTRACTOR TOPALL N[B.DI MITIES AND BOx 'NOR TOnG ROPLASCES SIMI Or CNAEHNG BANYAN ST BANYAN ST El II ED < LI F'R' ST ET a ` 0 slTe LEMON nvE HIGHLAND AVE E Ex Y —A., .,—LAMTYSTMET IT Al — TAR MIT— Ert�l�ry 7al yu� tl .�N ,y m V m 00 La 00 ID m V I 00 L3 LD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ; BLOCK WALL PLAN E FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19557 C B. q mt:6 m I 3a�a Ito XLL- -- - - ..... ...GARAGE GARAGE. i F.F =1fi01.0 LOT 2 F F. 1603.0 GARAGE LOT 3 F F.=1603 50 F 1605.0 `,. F.F.=1601 50 - , ,. .. PAD=1603 0 PAD=1601 0 �. I LOT 1 r P F.F 1605.50. i...t'. D PAD=1605.0. J q 1 r, - f - - - -- ----- r w: ` - ---- - -- - --- J f�: J R n a Z _ a El u vecr - DIWnK J m PERIMETER WALLOETAII mro - -- rY �»�. a, Nr wr, I(�S-V OY wapMMBLL�L aLLttPa uO Rrµe K� 1-p rd Ou w, A ]d IXt/K w.IlC W P.w MO T,a PERIMETER WALL DETAIL xn rw,wv m¢ d 4� tp m. ffN ou w4 wi N.r,.m IXna e°,e Diu a sum ron.w - wwr wmrw Nt ]-4 KCr R.wrG uLL rY-E ,sM G,S IMa �n5 SUBTPM1055] 6 DRC301 L W> 0 m x m m ' V ' Ill OD o 0 PRELIMINARY WQMP & SITE DRAINAGE PLAN FOR PARCEL 19557 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOT 2 3 LOT 3 LOT 1 ' 0.31 A RESPONSIAl a VWn FOR MARH NANCF n msKMENN m.w.T.O im[9u[NI sO IIPy� &W 1> [W Wi4l w51 �nxxlA4ftln iM. o of R..R'."r 1. LEGLEG=NG M q25 ux0[uPOuU� ua wog �xruw.imrz� ao wo '" x�l FVx &, uME n.uSu[nl wK�K[ MMRS x.H "'_ 6Fin [,,2T T 0 w R •19PN —D µI M TIY TO M . 0'•1 ar.m� ..S 6 M o.2... !G" 1[vtRE 1-ml Rl 'lysicnimYLiiuruiatL• n arncntavwa�u-t.w w.u. n.alnr uu m V 1 m 00 -c -o to J PRELIMINARY WQMP BMP DETAILS FOR PARCEL 19557 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ssTwM w o wn i[ uw[o to.m[vuuu.[ m TPIVJ. SECTU o.INffllM11CH iPENCX L w �L wt 0 w r 0 J m 00 v Lo 1: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CUT/FILL MAP FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19557 EMTHWORM SbwicE_.l.omo Lcv (�sil .—.1 >u a T. surm rrcuox .we rox xemm �xo aoxwxc 1. C. .1 YFWV gYM1�Fs a2� Yj r- i L NO o- 3 UNITS 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT 9757 LIBERTY STREET RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 moM n"u� "emu" ,, . u . � i. t'T i b e r• . ayn i REiE1014E M■1!4 �r)...4n zs(vwra.4w1. ( \.)Wu/r. .Y.. /� gl \J v�♦Ll to Tx M�¢4/.♦x••• � r i oa rrw� - �n+i lu J 3 F R ELEVAi 0 �W"� �a M1N¢..O MPw YrY TE m E)m mn wl v " aY ro„I IIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIII OIIEWIIW NroEE szs v R nr•e.ruowe �� w�.rlrl�A—. >m onm m aa<..Yw ,r...mn�r¢m r m¢o �y y. � rsaxID„ IDI� rs.¢v .vm pEEGTORY aR W .Iar<u n � 1 n a Z- d Fa No waZ �ama LEEK EEfCRw1i0■ � I �4 iw�a lYe�Y(mYe�" p t� macr¢s .ua. r.¢uv. vm_esr-w M1.01 ,O TPY19557 k MM?4- a 10 wm OOJ00 —. s d 300V a" Lom3..V.. 3Au = laiii, <e 0 0 rc 0 Y s 4D dp I ' T t i t 1 l I I I T 6 J t F O 39 nEx F i Y I ,r-q 3 n J-AI A.o.3 �l §g8 'ak I O 0 c. 6 >• Y Z tl C -,d Q EXHIBIT H E7-E8Pg14 SL6d 83—L3 m 4' m=n cas'-r [A wgi a-Ir le'-n I BO � ®a S A I n O Q A p@ � Y as moo I s ---- - I . .Fig II,_ L_,,,_ b { In _ pad I. -..-- VNk L tf-W' 6 9 Fj II t i : ® O { i I T i I 1 L A i 0� i --------------- �� —16 as G i l[ Y IT i R O In DEVELOPMENT PLAN PACKAGE _ w appd TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19557-3 LOTS 9757 LIEI STREET �.f1 W&r�W Lona�Des'9n_casultonis. Inc RANCHO CUCAMONGA, Ca CA 91737 N § m.'oo:`i em newY.i �uml .1 mve fLooRAX00.0aFPUIRS auI .,."nsuoD o6osa0 yV ^1M�M V ;' E7-E8Pg16 SN"ddoaxaxvuomd :zre.eau {�{ LCLL6 VJ 'VONOi9VJno oHJNVa r 2 ? • $ AAA S uaaen LSL6 v 51 S101 f-4SS6l dVW 130HVd 3AI1tl1N31 pp@ Q 30tl OVd NVId 1N3WdO73A30 NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION O TM[ pYW'' art rN. I Sul ann a m m-�m. wum+. a.w �wrm imw a w.� �• m"9°m u.w � m µx. `rw ww ewww u.m Oa pI T.w p> ..ti wmxs1whrm rtsu Iw.xxm�o' Osws mx wu qaw Or+m. inn'xvow mx un [rwt O rzrcMm ttmo r�oNuuh wwE. �p r- m Z. Z. A•3.01 10 m V. I 00 v to 00 REFERENCE NOTES c O 8 X. az a [�iiv=-[Hm[i mwE o J^ - T.0. RIDGE — — �' m"n°iw ou« ewan uvvo 3 10 Ot .� n 3d3e _ - ---— T.O. _PLATE +Q u r»r, w [wt. 9 Y 9 6 O'[ m[ u lass m1 O 0 M � [m�ueG0.ttMr [ >xxt -1.O:_J_OIST' 0„„Q w.a wv4 nm rom wv, ° ❑ � x � Y '[ ONSK9P4 WN vm: 14WPm pvl \ Y O. SIAR444 Ma n+n. m� 1n rn» zrcw�w 8 16 12 SOUTH ELEVATION[ , s T.O. RIDGE ut 0 3 M - r T,0_PLATE am 6 a a 10 2J V o n T.O_JOIST C-u u d < 2 FFza ' 000000 9 000000 000000 °P 5 on0000 000000 oO000C]o -' o 01 w,W 000000 000000 000000<m=W 0000 T.O—SLAB w w, a o�mp F 000000 000000 — 13 B i5 12 16 I WEST ELEVATION A-3.02 TYPE'A'. ELEVAl10N3 SCALE 1f0+1W SUBTPM1955). & DRC2014-0000 10 — — m V m 00 b to 8 TYPE'&V, ELEVATIONS NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SCALE,11411'4- v..6pm[N:I K o� PP �:I�,a� �IlxsaM •� ma � 11 •waa""'0lea� 0 m_rv°`� s'"`-0wws°iois x vb10rmM Di ti ww• snrle mw soin w,r. v Mwi uw• Y fMx[ �m4 Oi �� 1 b�9msn noC. Oi �Ar MMilsteoun o,n tm.os rtpf� omx s¢i( 0� wn [[iVA rtfiri� Wq iRK. Ommn mi Q s mnx rzu,m °r O lM-Y n Ima'. Ptt[SN Pu45 M arm NR Pm6 • iM mlm Ymv: IA.WR R00 BMA OmYw O .+.A Lli xW �M pw Wx4 '�' mas vu r.•P�.°P.n.�xm o• 11111�'lll�llllm Iln ',mi'mll'mmmn'mliiw nlmnl nnmmm_--��po O nn'lmnlmmnmlmul_��•' nmmmutIII i. nmm�mn'mnnino mm'm;nmmmmm,.. n' m5'iim'mmnimmmmmmmmnunm- =�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIw,.. ^.mmmmmmmmm o . nnmmmimmmmlmmmnmmgm- © a ummmmmnn�.nn�.mlmmm.• •mnmm�ul�'mmm nmm mmnumi' r ' iii m 1110, "I m _u _o m 0 r o.. �- n 1 inmmnrmmmmu l nnimmm nnml mm.mn �.pmnnnnnl nnn Im'mnni in Ing m.mmnmm'mnmmnmllmmmmmnmm'mmm mmIII at mmnnmm ammm�ui.ni- .n'nutr iltii m nlmmmnl'mnr19,111 mnn�.nnum.mlmmm mmmmmmmnmm� nmulnmmmr� % mGlmnm -np non m�.mlmmm�umnlmnu mmmmmnmm•- s R ..,,.......—,+ r �� . -F nimiinuimniini mnnim'timntnu n'nmm.mimim1ili�liimioimliiiili�mi8im"' a =_�n� �...� © �! � III�IIIII e3'/ =�— mi mnnmmminm�rmmm�un'�mm�nnnmm��— �-: nummmnnnnnnm numnmmr inrmmm�nm'r________- = .� r r _ C'� m V i m ao v Q NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION O ce mw Ib Mom. E M— I mmmlAu�huli MM e�,. O mm. Nix �� ttxv3T O Wu Ouw �xNb50. O t3ciwR[Y. Wr6 a D III I o[ Ou v I ME. uCui MSyS O L rwu' mutu Mir A/n Mv. wmm[ m (ea[ iwl. O Po. MMEVt., wHruLu'xm smC. Oi Mwx� MI,x0. � <axM. wnm Mla Q w.vun ,m. m4 dru�i [cdgs MW� s�v mx mx rtuPao ow. O �maon mn', azttss Pxms mx,n urz�; � vum, w wmm uvu Ovtni uRttxt x�mx em ou nVrtC O xx'xomu�wMIME �e rw E—_ s.»R�,�x.xx� fflffl-�-7 SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION Sws Od! aW. Rf-�i W. �I.b54x3Z O ce Ww.' Ecu� EH�MFM h Wn O] [�(bRrtuNaRlq[ai¢�iM�.i. 0 �. lll pw ��Ew�sam� Era reeo��a�° & DRC201 NORTH ELEVATION 11 - Ti� Y V L'� EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 11411'.7 �uYf�W O rW �M•,w>.I4,VM1Y 4 pr MvrX[XI Nu V.wW u•,uu.,... MMua Xp,V�i lglMrye lr4xm u 1uF uw �.¢ /nn IY am •�,�. r. vv�seo mn rexm ww mwms mn: oex sm ew..msoe m 7-7 NEI SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION TYR W: 1IMAMNS REFERERGE NOTEl - T-ri . i &Mv.YE w.. nu M�wNa cam aw w 1 .^p awsys i A G w sltl � o u a Az..=='o N V ( w pm Y. In IG � A-3.02 a> NORTH ELEVATION-^•^••^-�- ❑ F y<y Z �xo�irvnus � � Y L s ZwrV 1 ry�timu EAST ELEVATION I'- m I: V w SOUTH ELEVATION . Iti WEST ELEVATION tyre re.r: eievAtaxe 0 i � . max nwl J • °l xia.V Slow I I I: rmuui�ple mineoui I NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION R RU�CE NOTES U C) 0 F L'F IF SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION I w Ill INSFEMICE NOTES (T) C) 21 1A Tb_t A FL ,J l� r;K'+ m p ixSUIwO�Ox EEN 1RF[5 `mE5 f ' I PLANT LEGEND �J [� r LOT 1 • S Pp`fff �� c.4A' . 'yam° t�6;j�+=1_mtvn_eee444o_a_e_n_c,��°.�a % i4hA�..a6i li4oe Oral---r a S '�try�s \uS---- p err, A� �Oil 7 [Y� 'i f f t\ ! 'a! aa ` ♦ f� 1\I\• ►rs�v � \y�O�hA.,• �r�.y r^s -r. r ��\� /1 \�� ♦ I � q r \I ��i�'� 4 Y S�ni i� FaERLRECN .RM. ..0w PROPCRry Y YAECHA4 PI4.T 'LO EPINGOmOCR IXRUBI KONL OMKn'nY5 wN15 TY Lalr 1 3 W&W Land Design Consultants, InC. 2335 W. Foothill Blvd, Suite 1, Upland, CA 91786 Civil engineering, Subdivision, Land planning PH: (909) 608-7118 Fax (909) 946-1137 January 18, 2017 Subject: Neighborhood Meeting Report Tract SUBTPM19557 & DRC2014-00700 APN: 0201-251-56 Project at 9757 Liberty St, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Hosted By: W&W land Design Consultants, Inc. 2335, W. Foothill Blvd., suite 1, Upland, CA 91786 (909) 608-7118 Fax: (909) 946-1137 Attendees: Applicant's team: Architect: Tom Lau Engineer: Winston Liu Owner Representative: Winnie Zheng Owner Representative: Neville Lin Owner Representative: Stephen Whyld Architect Assistant: Thandrai Sunitha Murthi Case Planner: Dominick Perez Public: Mrs. Frida Dotson & Mr. Dotson Mrs. Rebecca & Mr. Les Davies Mrs. Christen Ruiz and Mr. Tony A Neighborhood meeting was conducted on Wednesday, Jan 18'h 2017 between 6 pm to 7pm at Vineyard Jr. High School located at 6440 Mayberry Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737. Public were informed of the neighborhood meeting by sending invitations through postal mails. Invitations were posted on Jan 511 to about 150 houses within 600' feet radius neighborhood of the project site at 9757 Liberty St, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737. Copies of the invitation and mailing list (with names and addresses) is herewith attached. The meeting was conducted in the multi -purpose room of Vineyard Junior high school in the presence of the case planner, Peter Dominick. The applicant's design team, and Engineer displayed the drawings of the proposed project at 6pm. Sign -in sheets and comment sheets were provided along with handouts, note pads and pencils. Four families -1- EXHIBIT J E7-E8 Pg33 W&W Land Design Consultants, Inc. 2335 W. Foothill Blvd, Suite 1, Upland, CA 91786 Civil engineering, Subdivision, Land planning PR (909) 608-7118 Fax: (909) 946-1137 attended the meeting. One person among them declined to disclose his name. A copy of the sign -in sheet has been attached as well. First 15 minutes, went with one on one discussion between the architect's team, public and the planner. At 6:15pm, Owner's representative, Stephen Whyld after an official introduction, presented briefing the project and opened up for open discussion. Public came up with few questions and concerns which are as enumerated below: One on one comments /discussions prior to official discussion: As discussed to the planner: • No architectural articulations on the west side of the proposed Lot 2 building. Request to see more architectural details, elements and enhancements carried iaround all sides of the house. Ans: Architectural design is in the process. Planner would work with the architect and work out the requests to the best. • Is it a variance? Ans: No, it is not a variance. It is a land subdivision. • Does code allow the sub division of land? Ans: Yes, the code allows for subdivision of land. • Is the proposed design adhering to the code setbacks? Yes, the setbacks are adhered as per the code requirements. • Is there a CUP? Ans: No, there is no CUP. • Request planting along west property line to screen second floor of new homes looking into backyards of the existing single story homes. Ans: Yes, landscape will be provided along the west side of the lot. Official open discussion: • The driveway of Lot 1 is very close to the backyard of the property adjacent to lot 1 on NW corner. How far is the driveway away from the existing wall and from the concerned property? Ans by Tom: Required setback is 20'. Provided a distance of 29'-6" from the wall (29'-0" from the property line). 25' for the driveway and backup and 5'-6" for landscape. • Is another wall being built? Or any other proposal on that wall? Ans by Tom: No new wall is proposed. But a 3 feet height planter wall is proposed 3' feet away from the wall giving room for planters. -2- E7—E8 Pg34 W&W Land Design Consultants, Inc. 2335 W. Foothill Blvd, Suite 1, Upland, CA 91786 Civil engineering, Subdivision, Land planning PH (909) 608-7118 • Building too close to his backyard and worried about windows looking straight to his back of the house. Ans by Tom: The windows in Lot 1 bedrooms are approximately 63' away from the existing fence yard wall. In total approximately 132' from his bedroom windows. Existing landscape in his property plus new landscaping with tree screening on the north side of Lot 1 will provide further privacy to the existing home. • Is there a driveway light pole? If so nuisance of light to bedrooms at the back. Ans by Tom: No, there is no light pole on the driveway. Existing street light pole to remain in the same location. • Can the light pole be relocated? If so, who will pay for the light pole relocation? Ans by Tom and Winston: Need to discuss with the city if deemed necessary. Developer will pay the cost for relocating the light pole. Per present design, the existing light pole will remain in the same location. • Who is building these houses? Are the houses built and then sold or the vice versa? Ans by Tom: The developer is building the houses and then selling them. • When is the construction likely to start? Ans by Tom and Winston: Planning process likely to take 4 months and Construction document approval another 4 months. • Do you have the approval to tear down the house? Ans by Winston: Not yet. But efforts are taken to speed up the process. • Concern of the current condition of site being an eyesore and dangerous with coyote's wandering the site. Request to tear down the existing eyesore chain link fence and build a better fence and secure the place. Ans by Tom: Will take care of the concern ASAP. • Request to start construction as soon as possible for the site being a nuisance as regards safety and aesthetics. Ans by Winston: Looking forward to start demolition and construction once the planning department approves. • There are one story houses on the west side of the proposed two story buildings. How is the privacy issue being addressed? Ans by Tom: Yes, we are going to do landscape and mitigate any work with the city planning department. We are going to landscape on the east side of the lot as well and add more trees to address privacy. -3- E7-E8Pg35 W&W Land Design Consultants, Inc. 2335 W. Foothill Blvd, Suite 1, Upland, CA 91786 Civil engineering, Subdivision, Land planning PH: (909) 608-7118 Fax: (909) 946-1137 • Will the public get to review the meeting comments prior to any construction process at the proposed lot? Ans by Tom and planner: A report of the neighborhood meeting will be compiled by architect and planner and the public will get to review the same. • Will public be notified of the Planning meeting. Ans by planner: yes, they will be notified of the Planning meeting. • Has the sewer design for the proposed lots taken into consideration? What is the proposal? Ans by Winston: Yes, it has been taken care. Lot 1 and Lot 2 are gravity drained to the city mains. Lot 3 sewer proposed to be pumped to the city mains by sewer pumps. • Would there be noise due to the sewer pumps? Ans by Winston: There won't be any noise as sewer pumps are going to be 8 feet below ground. A noise report analysis has already been submitted to the city for review. • An existing eucalyptus tree in the NW corner of Lot 3 was brought up for discussion. The owner, fears it falling down and requests to remove the same. Mrs. Luke had called Winston last week and had expressed this concern. Ans by Winston and Tom: Will discuss with the city and taken necessary steps. • The meeting officially ended at 6:35pm. No additional questions were asked from the attendees and guests left at 6.45pm. The architects team and planner stayed there till 7:10 pm and concluded the meeting. However, when we left at 7:10 pm and were loading the car, a couple came in late to the meeting. We gave the project handouts and contact information and asked them to call us with their concerns. If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact our office or email us at winstonliu(a)ww-technologies.com. Sincerely, Winston Liu, PE Principal Engineer lid E7—E8 Pg36 YOU ARE INVITED •Vk NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING You are welcome to attend a neighborhood meeting in order to address questions or comments regarding the following proposed development: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00700: A request to develop 3 single-family residential homes in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map 19557 on a parcel of 42,150 square feet located within the Low Residential (L) District at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. Jan 18th, 2017 6:00 pm — 7:00 pm Meeting Location: Vineyard Junior High School 6440 Mayberry Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Contact Information: Owner: Champion One Investment 11750 Jersey Blvd., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Winston Liu — winstonliu(a)ww-technologies.com W&W Land Design Consultants, Inc. (909) 608-7118 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Dominick Perez— Dominick. Perezacityofrc.us (909) 477-2750 ext. 4315 E7-E8 Pg37 SITE LOCATION 0 v a3. MEETING"`"° LOCATION 0 SICK) NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING DATE: 1-18-2017 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00700 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19557 APN: 0201-251-56 9757 LIBERTY STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE SIGN -IN IINIF. i o5 nr.6,,6ald Hut G: SC etc es o.Ni e 3 - '• 5 i / z9 7,7D tir v 1 AA Y'a _ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING DATE: 1-18-2017 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00700 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19557 APN: 0201-251 _56 9757 LIBERTY STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 APRIL 18, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS Room CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Ray Wimberly X 7:00 P.M Rich Macias X Candyce Burnett Donald Granger X Alternates: Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca Additional Staff Present: Mike Smith, Senior Planner; Dominick Perez, Associate Planner; Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS None This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. EXHIBIT K Page 1 of 4 E7—E8 Pg41 /`1rITIL IUD LV I / M / .VV r.1Y1. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE C1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00726 - IPT ARROW ROUTE DC, LP - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 611,573 square foot industrial building on 26.63 acres of land in the General Industrial (GI) District on the north side of Arrow Route and west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0229-021-60. The Committee accepted the changes made by the applicant and forwarded project to Planning Commission C2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557 - W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS - A request to subdivide a parcel of 42,150 square feet into three (3) parcels in conjunction with the development of three (3) single-family residential homes within the Low (L) Residential District located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. Related file: Minor Design Review DRC2014-00700. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 - W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS - A request to develop three (3) single-family residential homes in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map 19557 on a parcel of 42,150 square feet within the Low Residential (L) District located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557. The Committee briefly discussed the project and recommended approval with no issues and forwarded project to Planning Commission. C3. DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2016-00338 - OWEN'S COURT ESTATES, LLC. - A request to modify Design Review DRC2014-00207 for an approved 6-lot subdivision to revise the plotting and architecture for six (6) single-family residences within the Low Residential (L) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, on Owens Court, located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Banyan Street - APNs: 0227-842-01, -02, -03, -04, -05 and -06. Related files: Development Review DRC2014-00207 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. The Committee briefly discussed the project and recommended approval subject to staffs recommended conditions and forwarded project to Planning Commission. C4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19762 - DR HORTON - A request to subdivide 28.4 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20032 - DR HORTON - A request fora residential condominium subdivision for 380 residential units on 28.4 Page 2 of 4 E7—E8 Pg42 r'% V 111L I Vy LV I I - I .VV r-.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE acres of land in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-001 2, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00450 - DR HORTON - A request for site plan and architectural review in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-00451 - DR HORTON - A request for a Uniform Sign Program in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. The Committee recommended approval subject to the following; Village A: For the 3 story Townhome Rowhome on all 5, 6, or 7 plex buildings and elevation schemes, additional materials and elements shall be added to the front and rear elevations that are appropriate to the Craftsman -inspired design. Materials shall include the following as appropriate: board and batten and lap siding, introducing brick, additional amounts of shingle siding, and windows appropriate to the architectural style. Village D: For all plans and architectural styles, additional materials and elements shall be added that are appropriate to each style to achieve the 360 degree architecture requirement. For the Craftsman and Shingle styles, materials shall include board and batten siding, shingle siding, brick or rock, lap siding. For the Santa Barbara and Italianate style, materials and features shall include elements and architectural vocabulary that Page 3 of 4 E7—E8 Pg43 r%r-F-IL IV, LV I / - f .VV r.IVI. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA 1:T-11C D7: 00 t t CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE are authentic to the style and placed on the wall plane appropriately in order to meet the 360 design requirement. In addition, the following enhancements shall be made: - Plans 1B, I and 1 D. Rework the locations of the 3"plaster recess to reflect each style in an authentic manner. - Plans 2A, 2B and 2D: With the exception of the first floor on Plans 2B and 2D, rework the locations of the 3"plaster recess to reflect each style in authentic manner. - Plans 3B, 3C and 3D: Rework the locations of the 3"plaster recess to reflect each style in an authentic manner. All Villages: All garage doors shall be appropriate and enhance the architectural style, and generic door styles shall not be used. Linear park: The presented an updated and revised linear park design that was not part of the Committee's plan packet. The Committee found the park layout acceptable. The linear park was designed with the following features and amenities: sidewalk on two sides, two open turf areas that could be utilized for open play, soccer, badminton, and volleyball, bench seating, two shaded areas with game tables, and two bocce ball courts. D. ADJOURNMENT The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist II with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on day, Thursday, April 6, 2017, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Jennifer Palacios Office Specialist II City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 4 of 4 E7—E8 Pg44 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Dominick Perez April 18, 2017 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557 - W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS - A request to subdivide a parcel of 42,150 square feet into three (3) parcels in conjunction with the development of three (3) single-family residential homes within the Low (L) Residential District located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. Related file: Minor Design Review DRC2014- 00700. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 - W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS -A request to develop three (3) single-family residential homes in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map 19557 on a parcel of 42,150 square feet within the Low Residential (L) District located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557. Site Characteristics: The project site is a 42,150 square foot parcel in a single-family residential neighborhood located northeast of the interjection of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue at 9757 Liberty Street. The dimensions of the parcel are 130.99 feet from east to west and 334 feet from north to south. The site contains an unoccupied single-family residence. There are a combination of wood fences and block walls along the east, west and south perimeters of the site. Street improvements along the north end of the property consist of street, curb and gutter, cobble parkway, sidewalk and an existing driveway. The site is generally level with an elevation change of about 16 feet between the northwest and southeast corners of the property. The site is located within the Low -Residential (L) District. The surrounding properties to the north, south, east and west are developed with single-family homes and are also located within the Low -Residential (L) District. Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the subject property into three (3) parcels and construct one single-family house on each lot. The subdivision will result in a generally conventional lot (Lot 1) with two (2) flag lots (Lots 2 and 3) behind it (as seen from the street). The conventional lot will have an area of 11,492 square feet while the two flag lots will have areas of 13,303 square feet and 17,355 square feet (Lots 2 and 3, respectively). Lot 1 has a width of 91 feet and a depth of 134 feet. The "buildable" part of Lot 2 has a depth of 110 feet and a width of 100 feet while that of Lot 3 has a depth of 130.99 feet and a width of 100 feet. To allow vehicular and pedestrian access to Liberty Street, the flag lots will be connected to it by separate "poles", i.e. elongated sections of each lot. The poles for Lots 2 and 3 will be 20400t wide by 110.4-foot long and 20-foot wide by 211-foot long, respectively. The project also involves the construction of one two-story house on each lot. The floor area of the houses will range in size from 4,355 square feet (Lot 2) to 4,746 square feet (Lot 1). According to the table below, there are a total of two floor plans that will be used. All of the houses will have a three -car garage. The houses and site layout conform to the technical standards required in the Low Residential (L) District including setbacks, building height, and lot coverage. Lot No. Of Story Floor Plan Type 151 Floor SF 2n° Floor SF Total Living Area SF Garage SF 1 2 A 2,521.74 2,225.06 4,746.80 775.20 2 2 B-1 2.488.02 1,857.17 4,355.19 720.24 3 2 B-2 2,767.52 1,975.84 4,743.36 720.24 The houses will also comply with the design guidelines specified within Section 17.122.010 of the Development Code, which require 360-degree architecture. The architectural styles that are proposed to be used are Craftsman and Ranch. The Craftsman elevation type, which will be used on Lot 1, will have stucco -finished walls with stone veneer and horizontal siding, front porch with Ito 1 E7 2h8 Pg45 DRC COMMENTS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557 & MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS April 18, 2017 Page 2 battered columns, concrete tile roofing and decorative garage doors and windows. The Ranch elevation type, which will be used on Lots 2 and 3, will have stucco walls with stone veneer, horizontal siding (Lot 3), gable accents, concrete tile roofing and decorative garage doors and windows. Staff Comments: Staff is in support of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557 and Minor Design Review DRC2014-00700. Each parcel complies with all the applicable development criteria for standard and flag -shaped lots within the Low Residential (L) District. The residences are well designed and the architectural design theme, and roof and wall plane articulation, has been applied to all elevations. Maior Issues: The following design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: I I 1. None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. None. Code Compliance Issues: 1. None. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: None. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Item C2-2 E7—E8 Pg46 RESOLUTION NO. 17-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557, A PROPOSAL TO SUBDIVIDE A PARCEL OF 42,150 SQUARE FEET INTO THREE (3) PARCELS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE (3) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT 9757 LIBERTY STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0201-251-56. A. Recitals. 1. W&W l and Design Consultants filed an application for the apprgqval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557, as described in the title of this Resolution. HereinafteF in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of May 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 42,150 square foot parcel located within the residential neighborhood at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue at 9757 Liberty Street. The dimensions of the parcel are 130.99 feet from east to west and 334 feet from north to south. The site contains an unoccupied single-family residence. There are a combination of wood fences and block walls along the east, west and south perimeters of the site. Street improvements along the north end of the property consist of street, curb and gutter, cobble parkway, sidewalk and an existing driveway. The site is generally level with an elevation change of about 16 feet between the northwest and southeast corners of the property; and b. The site is located within the Low -Residential (L) District. The surrounding properties to the north, south, east and west are developed with single-family homes and are also located within the Low -Residential (L) District; and C. The project proposes to subdivide the subject property into three (3) parcels and construct one single-family house on each lot; and E7—E8 Pg47 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-41 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557 - W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 10, 2017 Page 2 d. The subdivision will result in a generally conventional lot (Lot 1) with two (2) flag lots (Lots 2 and 3) behind it (as seen from the street). The conventional lot will have an area of 11,492 square feet while the two flag lots will have areas of 13,303 square feet and 17,355 square feet (Lots 2 and 3, respectively). Lot 1 has a width of 91 feet and a depth of 134 feet. The "buildable" part of Lot 2 has a depth of 110 feet and a width of 100 feet while that of Lot 3 has a depth of 130.99 feet and a width of 100 feet. To allow vehicular and pedestrian access to Liberty Street, the flag lots will be connected to it by separate "poles", i.e. elongated sections of each lot. The poles for Lots 2 and 3 will be 20-foot wide by 110.4-foot long and 20-foot wide by 211-foot long, respectively; and e. The project also involves the construction of one 2-story house on each lot (Minor Design Review DRC2014-00700); and f. A neighborhood meeting was conducte�I to gather input and comments from the I of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Vineyard Junior High at 6440 Mayberry Avenue on January 18, 2017. Several property owners from the surrounding community attended. Although none of them had any specific objections to the project, there were questions and concerns relating to the placement and design of 2-story homes, the timing of development, as well as the demolition of the existing house onsite. Staff indicated to the residents that the questions and concerns addressed at the neighborhood meeting would be taken into consideration moving forward; and g. The Design and Technical Review Committees reviewed the proposal on April 18, 2017. No issues were identified at either meeting and both Committees accepted the proposal as submitted and forwarded the project to the Planning Commission for review and action; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The General Plan encourages the facilitation of sustainable and attractive infill development that compliments surrounding neighborhoods. The project will meet this goal as the property is surrounded by single-family residences and will be complimentary to the neighborhood. The project is also in compliance with the Development Code as it meets the required development standards, including minimum lot dimensions and minimum and average lot area; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The subject site currently contains street improvements along the north end of the property consisting of street, curb and gutter, cobble parkway, sidewalk and an existing driveway; and C. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The site was previously developed and contains a single-family home and is located within an urbanized area of the City, surrounded by single-family homes along the north, south, east and west. The proposed subdivision will comply with the City's General Plan Land Use designation and is not anticipated to negatively impact the environment; and E7—E8 Pg48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-411 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557 - W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 10, 2017 Page 3 d. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project involves the subdivision of a single parcel into three parcels for the construction of three single- family homes. The subdivision will comply with the City's density requirements specified within the Development Code and is not anticipated to cause serious public health problems; and e. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The adjacent properties to the west, south and east are single-family homes and to the north is public right-of-way. The proposed project will not conflict with any easements. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under Classes 3 nd 15 exemptions under State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and 15315 (Minor Subdivisions) because the project involves the construction of three (3) single-family houses and a subdivision of one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels, respectively.. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E7—E8 Pg49 Conditions of Approval RANCHO CtRSJON6t Community Development Department Project#: SUBTPM19557and DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map and Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for the subdivision one (1) 42,116 square foot parcel into three (3) parcels for a site located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. 2. Approval is for the construction of three (3) two-story single-family residences on the future parcels to be subdivided on property located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the final map shall be recorded. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. Approval of Tentative Tract No. 19557 is granted subject to the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557. 6. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval with Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 8. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 9. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission or unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 10. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 11. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. Printed: 4/26/2017 vmw.CityofRC.us E7—E8 Pg50 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 1 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations. 13. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Fol single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 14.All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained)I by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Ptoof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15.Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 16. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 17. Prior to any use of the project site, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 18. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 19. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions . 1. Protect, repair or relocate existing curb, gutter, sidewalk, street light and mailbox. 2. Remove existing drive approach and cobblestone and provide drive approaches per City Standard 101, Type R-1 and street trees per City standards. a. Revise existing City Drawing Number 1749 to reflect above improvements, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. For pads below streets, the first 6 feet of the driveway should slope away from the right-of-way elevation at no more than 6 percent. Printed: 4/26/2017 www.CilyofRC.us Page 2 of 11 E7—E8 Pg51 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: I MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. Process a revision to Drawing Number 888-D to show the private storm drain connection(s) to the existing public storm drain. Minimum pipe size within the public right-of-way is 18" RCP. 5. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. Prior to any work being performed in the street right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from Engineering. 7. The following development impact fees shall be paid upoq issuance of each building permit (fees subject1to change annually): a. Transportation Fee b. General Drainage Fee c. Library Impact Fee d. Animal Center Impact Fee e. Police Impact Fee f. Park In-Lieu/Park Impact Fee g. Park Improvement Impact Fee h. Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. 10. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. 11. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 12. Prior to approval of the final map, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 13.If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: Liberty Street. 14. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Printed: 4/26/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 11 E7—E8Pg52 Project #: DRC2014-00700 ProjectlName: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable laccess to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 16.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Liberty Street Botanical Name Lagerstroemia Indica Common Name Cape Myrtle Spacing 20' OC Size 24" box Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 17. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities,, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 18. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 19. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Printed: 4/2612017 vaW W.Cityol`RC.uS Page 4 of 11 E7—E8 Pg53 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 21. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. www.CityofRC.us Panted: 4/28/2017 Page 5 0} 11 E7—E8 Pg54 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage acceptance easements(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the' public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 13. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed: 4/26/2017 www.CityofRC.us page 6 of 11 E7—ES Pg55 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 17. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 18. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 19. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 20. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 21.If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 22. If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration pits to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 23. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off -site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 24. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 25. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent Printed: 4/26/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 11 E7—E8Pg56 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 26. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 27. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 28. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 29. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 30. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 31.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off -site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. 33. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. Printed: 4/26/2017 www.CityofRC.us page 8 of 11 E7—E8 Pg57 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 34. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 35. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 37. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 38. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 39. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 40. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 41. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. Printed: 4/26/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 11 E7—E8Pg58 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 43. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table V11.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors'. 44. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 45. As structural storm water treatment devices (commonly referred to as BMP's) are proposed in the rear yards of the residential lots, the developer/applicant is conditioned to provide access easement(s) in favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to allow City staff access for inspections of the structural storm water treatment devices. Said easements may be shown on the Final Map, the Parcel Map or by a separate easement document. ,As an alternative, the CC&R's may be written to require the Homeowner's Association to inspect and maintain the BMP's on an annual basis and provide a BMP inspection and maintenance report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Programs Manager annually. 46. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 47. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 4/26/2017 www.CilyofRC.us Page 10 of 11 E7—E8 Pg59 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 48. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. On the Site Plan to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within the vicinity of the proposed project site. 2. The required fire flow for this project is calculated in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with current edition of the California Fire, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinance. 3. The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD54 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards can be access on the web at www.cityofrc.us. Printed: 4/26/2017 www.CilyofRC.us Page 11 0(11 E7—E8 Pg60 RESOLUTION NO. 17-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 FOR A PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP THREE (3) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES IN CONJUNCTION WITH TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19557 ON A PARCEL OF 42,150 SQUARE FEET WITHIN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL (L) DISTRICT LOCATED AT 9757 LIBERTY STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0201-251-56. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for the approval of Minor Design Review DRC2014-00700 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to,the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 42,150 square foot parcel located within the residential neighborhood at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue at 9757 Liberty Street. The dimensions of the parcel are 130.99 feet from east to west and 334 feet from north to south. The site contains an unoccupied single-family residence. There are a combination of wood fences and block walls along the east, west and south perimeters of the site. Street improvements along the north end of the property consist of street, curb and gutter, cobble parkway, sidewalk and an existing driveway. The site is generally level with an elevation change of about 16 feet between the northwest and southeast corners of the property; and b. The site is located within the Low -Residential (L) District. The surrounding properties to the north, south, east and west are developed with single-family homes and are also located within the Low -Residential (L) District; and C. The project proposes to subdivide the subject property into three (3) parcels and construct one single-family house on each lot (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557); and E7—E8 Pg61 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-42 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 10, 2017 Page 2 d. The floor area of the houses will range in size from 4,355 square feet (Lot 2) to 4,746 square feet (Lot 1). According to the table below, there are a total of two floor plans that will be used. All of the houses will have a three -car garage. The houses and site layout conform to the technical standards required in the Low Residential (L) District including setbacks, building height, and lot coverage; and e. The houses will also comply with the design guidelines specified within Section 17.122.010 of the Development Code, which require 360-degree architecture. The architectural styles that are proposed to be used are Craftsman and Ranch. The Craftsman elevation type, which will be used on Lot 1, will have stucco -finished walls with stone veneer and horizontal siding, front porch with battered columns, concrete tile roofing and decorative garage doors and windows. The Ranch elevation type, which will be used on Lots 2 and 3, will have stucco walls with stone veneer, horizontal siding (Lot 3), gable accents, concrete tile roofing and decorative garage doors and windows; and f. A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Vineyard Junior High at 6440 Mayberry Avenue on January 18, 2017. Several property owners from the surrounding community attended. Although none of them had any specific objections to the project, there were questions and concerns relating to the placement and design of 2-story homes, the timing of development, as well as the demolition of the existing house onsite. Staff indicated to the residents that the questions and concerns addressed at the neighborhood meeting would be taken into consideration moving forward; and g. The Design and Technical Review Committees reviewed the proposal on April 18, 2017. No issues were identified at either meeting and both Committees accepted the proposal as submitted and forwarded the project to the Planning Commission for review and action. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Low (L). The project is for the construction of three single-family residences on three previously subdivided parcels of land that conform to the maximum density range of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. The Low (L) District is designated for the development of single-family residences, with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet and a maximum residential density of 4 units per acre. The project is for the development of 3 single- family residences on a parcel that is proposed to be subdivided into three lots that will meets the lots size requirements; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project conforms to each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code including building setbacks, lot coverage and building design; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements E7—E8 Pg62 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-42 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 10, 2017 Page 3 in the vicinity. The proposed single-family residences are of similar design and density to the existing single-family development in the surrounding area. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under Classes 3 and 15 exemptions under State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and 15315 (Minor Subdivisions) because the project involves the construction of three (3) single-family houses and a subdivision of one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels, respectively.. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and'every condition set forth in the attached Conditions of Approval. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L-"v ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E7—E8 Pg63 Conditions of Approval R"H�}1O Community Development Deartment Project #: SUBTPM19557 and DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: Project Type: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Tentative Parcel Map and Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for the subdivision one (1) 42,116 square foot parcel into three (3) parcels for a site located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. 2. Approval is for the construction of hree (3) two-story single-family residences on the future parcels to be subdivided on property located at =7 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the final map shall be recorded. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. Approval of Tentative Tract No. 19557 is granted subject to the approval of Tentative Parcel Map S UBTPM 19557. 6. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval with Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 8. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 9. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission or unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 10. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 11. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. Printed: 4/26/2017 v .CityofRC.us E7—E8 Pg64 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125166-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations. 13. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 14. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, orl other means acceptable to the City. Proof 6f this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15.Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 16. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 17. Prior to any use of the project site, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 18. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 19. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Protect, repair or relocate existing curb, gutter, sidewalk, street light and mailbox. 2. Remove existing drive approach and cobblestone and provide drive approaches per City Standard 101, Type R-1 and street trees per City standards. a. Revise existing City Drawing Number 1749 to reflect above improvements, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. For pads below streets, the first 6 feet of the driveway should slope away from the right-of-way elevation at no more than 6 percent. Printed: 4/28/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 11 E7—E8 Pg65 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. Process a revision to Drawing Number 888-D to show the private storm drain connection(s) to the existing public storm drain. Minimum pipe size within the public right-of-way is 18" RCP. 5. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. Prior to any work being performed in the street right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from Engineering. 7. The following development impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of each building permit (fees subject to ch�nge annually): a. Transportation Fee b. General Drainage Fee c. Library Impact Fee d. Animal Center Impact Fee e. Police Impact Fee f. Park In-Lieu/Park Impact Fee g. Park Improvement Impact Fee h. Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. 10. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. 11. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 12. Prior to approval of the final map, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 13.If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: Liberty Street. 14. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Printed: 4/26/2017 w .CilyorRC.us Page 3 of 11 E7—E8 Pg66 Project #: Project Namelc Location: Project Type: DRC2014-00700 MDR for Parcel 19557 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Minor Desion Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 16.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Liberty Street Botanical Name Lagerstroemia Indica Common Name Cape Myrtle Spacing 20' OC Size 24" box Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 17. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 18. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 19. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) .in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Printed: 4/26/2017 w .CityofRC.uS Page 4 of 11 E7—E8 Pg67 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 21. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. Printed:4/26/2017 www.CltyofRC.us Page 5 of 11 E7—E8 Pg68 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prig to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage acceptance easements(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public 'right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 13. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout `Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed: 4/26/2017 w .CltyofRC.us Page fi of 11 E7—E8 Pg69 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building. permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to Q Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 17. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 18. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 19. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 20. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 21.If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 22.If the depths of the infiltration „pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration pits to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 23. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off -site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 24. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the -Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 25. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent Printed: 4/26/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 7 of 11 E7—E8 Pg70 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MRR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 26. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 27. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 28. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtaih a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 29. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 30. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 31.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off -site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. 33. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. Printed: 4/26/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page eof 11 E7—E8 Pg71 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 34. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 35. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 37. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 38. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 39. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 40. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 41. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. Printed: 4/26/2017 w .CityofRC.uS Page 9 of 11 E7—E8 Pg72 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale) of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of tale maintenance agreements to be included in the Sall of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 43. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors'. 44. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 45. As structural storm water treatment devices (commonly referred to as BMP's) are proposed in the rear yards of the residential lots, the developer/applicant is conditioned to provide access easement(s) in favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to allow City staff access for inspections of the structural storm water treatment devices. Said easements may be shown on the Final Map, the Parcel Map or by a separate easement document. As an alternative, the CC&R's may be written to require the Homeowner's Association to inspect and maintain the BMP's on an annual basis and provide a BMP inspection and maintenance report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Programs Manager annually. 46. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official,, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 47. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed-0/26/2017 w .CityolRC.us Page 10 of 11 E7—E8 Pg73 Project #: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 10557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 48. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. On the Site Plan to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within the vicinity of the proposed project site. 2. The required fire flow for this project is calculated in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with current edition of the California Fire, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinance. 3. The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD54 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards can be access on the web at www.cityofrc.us. Printetlr4/26/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 11 E7—E8 Pg74 REPORT DATE: May 10, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00715 — LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request to modify the development standards within the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan related to the site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit, multi -family development on 12.1 acres of land within the Medium High (MH) District (14 - 24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway — APN: 1077-422-97. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Design Review DRC2016-00713, Variance DRC2017-00215, Minor Exception DRC2016-00716, Minor Exception DRC2017-00159 and Pre -Application DRC2016-00361. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20054 — LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request subdivide 12.1 acres of land for condominium purposes related to the site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit, multi -family development within the Medium High (MH) District (14 - 24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway — APN: 1077- 422-97. Related files: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00715, Design Review DRC2016-00713, Variance DRC2017-00215, Minor Exception DRC2016-00716, Minor Exception DRC2017-00159 and Pre - Application DRC2016-00361. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00713 — LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit, multi -family development on 12.1 acres of land within the Medium High (MH) District (14 - 24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway — APN: 1077-422-97. Related files: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Variance DRC2017- 00215, Minor Exception DRC2016-00716, Minor Exception DRC2017-00159 and Pre -Application DRC2016-00361. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2017-00215 — LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request to increase the maximum permitted wall height to over 8 feet for sound attenuation purposes related to the site plan and E9—E14Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TJJVCPA DRC2016-00715, TTM SUBTT20054, DR DRC2916-00713, ME DRC2016-00716, t E DRC2017-00159, and VARIANCE'DRC2017-00215 I LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 2 architectural review of a 214-unit, multi -family development on 12.1 acres of land within the Medium High (MH) District (14 - 24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway — APN: 1077-422-97. Related files: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Design Review DRC2016-00713, Minor Exception DRC2016- 00717, Minor Exception DRC2017-00717 and Pre -Application DRC2016- 00361. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016- 00716 — LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request to reduce the required on -site parking related to the site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit, multi- family development on 12.1 acres bf land within the Medium High (MH) District (14 - 24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway — APN: 1077- 422-97. Related files: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00715, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Design Review DRC2016-00713, Variance DRC2017-00215, Minor Exception DRC2017-00159 and Pre - Application DRC2016-00361. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017- 00159 — LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request to increase the maximum permitted property line wall heights from 6 to 8 feet related to the site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit, multi -family development on 12.1 acres of land within the Medium High (MH) District (14 - 24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway — APN: 1077-422-97. Related files: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Design Review DRC2016-00713, Variance DRC2017-00215, Minor Exception DRC2016-00717 and Pre -Application DRC2016-00361. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: • Recommend that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. • Recommend that the City Council approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715. • Approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Design Review DRC2016-00713, Variance DRC2017-00215, Minor Exception DRC2016-00716, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00159. E9—E14Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVCPA DRC2016-00715,ITTM SUBTT20054, DRIDRC2016-00713, ME DRC201i6-00716, ME DRC2017-00159, and VARIANCE DRC2017-00215 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 3 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 17.7 dwelling units per acre (14 -24 units per acre permitted) B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Attached and Detached Residences; Medium (M) District (8 — 14 dwelling units per acre), Terra Vista Community Plan South - Commercial Center; Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, Terra Vista Community Plan East - Office Buildings; Office Park (OPK) District, Terra Vista Community Plan West - Approved Senior Care Facility and an Office Building; Mixed Use (MU) and General Commercial (GC) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium High (MH) North - Medium (M) South - Neighborhood Commercial (NC) East - Office (0) West - Mixed Use (MU) & General Commercial (GC) D. Site Characteristics: The project site is generally rectangular in shape with a street frontage of approximately 700 feet along Haven Avenue, 850 feet along Church Street, 875 feet along Terra Vista Parkway and 160 feet along Town Center Drive. The site drains from north to south and is covered by non-native grasses. The site includes a .3 acre triangular piece of land at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street, which is maintained by the local Landscape Maintenance District. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes developing a 214-unit multi -family residential project (Design Review DRC2016-00713) on 12.1 acres on land at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway. The project includes a tentative tract map (SUBTT20054) for residential condominium purpose for 214 units, which includes 33 numbered lots and 3 lettered lots. B. Zoning: The project site and the surrounding parcels to the north, south and west are all within the Terra Vista Community Plan area. The project site is within the Medium High (MH) District, which permits 14 to 24 dwelling units per acre. There is existing attached and detached residential development to the north within the Medium (M) District; to the south there is commercial development within the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District; to the east is an office development within the Office Park (OPK) District; and to the west, across Haven Avenue, there is vacant land within the Mixed Use (MU) District that is approved for a senior care facility and an existing commercial/office development within the General Commercial (GC) District. A flood control facility (Deer Creek Channel) runs along the northwest corner of the project site. C. Design: The proposed development is made up of 2 product types: bungalows (81 units) and row townhomes (133 units). The bungalows will be located within the core of the project site and are plotted in groups of three buildings, which consist of three plan types: two, 2-story units and a carriage unit located above the garages. The open space for the two, 2-story units is located on the ground level between the units and carriage unit, with the open space for the carriage E9—E14Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVCPA DRC2016-00715, TTM SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, IME DRC2016-00716, ME DRC2017-00159, and VARIANCE DRC2017-00215 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 4 units provided on a second story deck. Each unit is accessed from a common paseo or through the garages. The freestanding units include 3 to 4 bedrooms with an optional bonus room/bedroom and range in size from 1,536 to 1,549 square feet. The carriage units include 2 master bedrooms with an option to convert one of the master bedrooms to two smaller bedrooms and are 1,464 square feet in size. The height of the bungalows is 25 feet, which is below the 45- foot permitted building height. The row townhomes are located around the perimeter of the project site and are made up of 2 and 3-story buildings, with 3 to 7 units per building and 4 plan types. The units along Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway will have their front doors directly face the public street, with the remainder of the row townhomes facing common paseos. The units are 3 to 4 bedrooms with an optional bonus room/bedroom ranging in size from 1,414 to 1,857 square feet and each includes a two -car enclosed garage. Open space is either provided by a patio on the ground floor (end units) or by decks on the second floor. The townhome� include an optioAal roof deck. The maximum height of the townhouses is 43 feet including the roof top decks (37 feet without roof top decks), below the maximum permitted 45 feet. The homes have a contemporary architectural design theme that incorporates a mix of materials including flat tile roofs, metal awnings, stucco, stone veneer and cementitious horizontal siding. The bungalows include 3 unique elevations for each plan type and the townhomes include up to 2 unique elevation types per building configuration. Each plan type includes wall and roof plane articulation and multiple paint schemes. The garage doors carry over the contemporary design theme of the buildings and include windows to assist the Home Owners Association in verifying that the garage spaces are available for vehicle parking. The project will take vehicular access from Church Street and from Terra Vista Parkway and will not be gated. An Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) gate will be located on Town Center Drive. The project will provide a pedestrian access path to the commercial development to the south and west. Private streets provide access to the enclosed garages and open parking. An internal sidewalk network provides access throughout the project site and to the public sidewalk. The Engineering Department is requiring that the applicant replace the existing 2-way stop at the intersection of Terra Vista Parkway and Town Center Drive with a 4-way stop. The project provides 40 percent common and private open space (35 percent required) and 50 trees per acre (50 trees per acre required). The project is also compliant with the parking lot tree planting requirement of 1 tree per 3 parking spaces and the screening requirements of the air conditioner units. D. Recreational Amenities: Projects between 200 and 300 units are required to provide at minimum 5 recreational amenities. The project provides the following recreational amenities: A pool and spa; 2. A 2,712 square foot community center with fitness center, common seating areas, catering kitchen and business center; 3. An outdoor recreation area adjacent to pool area that includes multiple seating and lounge areas, a fireplace, BBQ facilities and ping pong tables; E9—E14Pg4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVCPA DRC2016-00715', TTM SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC20'16-00716, ME DRC2017-00159, and VARIANCE DRC2017-00215 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 5 4. A separate outdoor recreation area with a tot lot, conversation area with benches, and a covered picnic table with BBQ units; 5. A separate outdoor recreation area with open play areas, benches and covered picnic table; 6. A separate area with built in corn hole platforms; and Landscaped paseos with open grass and seating areas. E. Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment: The project includes a Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00715) to amend the development criteria for the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan. The development criteria for the Medium High (MH) District was created for the development of larger multi -family projects made up of larger multi - tenant buildings which are usually surrounded by a common wall, such as the Santa Barbara project to the east of the project site. The current building setback and separation requirements in the Terra Vista Community Plan do not provide the flexibility necessary to create projects with entirely detached units or smaller multi -tenant buildings and that still maintain the 14 to 24 dwelling unit per acre density required in the Medium High (MH) District. The current development criteria also does not permit placing the front doors of the units closer to the public right-of-way in order to create a more active street frontage, similar to a single-family neighborhood. The goal of the proposed changes in the development criteria is not to increase the number of units that may be constructed on a project site, but rather to allow the flexibility to create a more urban neighborhood in which the street frontage is activated, with the front doors and windows of the units directly facing the public right - a -way. The proposed changes in the development criteria will provide developers with the opportunity to create projects that emphasize the public realm in which the residents take ownership of the public street, increasing the sense of public safety, rather than turning their back to the public street with a perimeter wall. The proposed project was designed to take advantage of the proposed development criteria. The front entrances of the townhomes directly face Church Street, Terra Vista Parkway or a common paseo, creating an active public space in which the pedestrians are in clear view of the front of each unit. The project is ungated with common walkways that provide direct pedestrian connection to the adjacent commercial development, along with easy access to the Terra Vista Town Center and to the adjacent multi -use trail along the Day Creek Channel. The project has a density of 17.7 dwelling units per acre, which is at the lower end of the permitted density range of 14 to 24 dwelling units per acre. If the project were required to comply with the current standards, the buildings would need to be placed up to 43 feet from the curb face and up to 40 feet from each other, making it difficult to meet the required density, creating a large setback from the public street and changing the overall feel of the neighborhood character of the project.. The proposed amendment will permit new developments with greater than 200 units more flexible standards similar to the reduction in the recently approved mixed use standards. The new criteria will allow new larger projects to provide unique site plans that meet the needs of the community while integrating into the surrounding neighborhood and the unique circumstances of the project site. The appropriateness of the reductions in the required setback will be determined on a case -by -case basis and reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee and the E9—E14Pg5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVCPA DRC2016-00715, TTM SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716, ME DRC2017-00159, and VARIANCE DRC2017-00215 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 6 Planning Commission. The text in bold below will be inserted into the Medium High standards of the Terra Vista Community Plan (Exhibit H). The following development standards are required for new developments with greater than 200 units*: • Street Setback - Up to 75% reduction of streetscape requirements • Building Separations - Up to 75% reduction from the related building separation requirements • Wall Setbacks - Up to 75% reduction from the related wall setback requirements • Private Open Space - Up to 35% reduction from the related private open space requirements. Recreational amenities shall be enhanced to provide additional features and service to residents offset the loss of private open space. *Subject to review and approval by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission per Section 17.20.040 (Design Review) of the Development Code. The table below illustrates the proposed reductions in the existing development criteria as comparted to the related requirements in the Terra Vista Community Plan and the Development Code. Existing Existing Development Proposed Development Terra Vista Community Code Standard Plan Building Setbacks: -Church Street 38-Foot Minimum 43-foot Average 26-Feet -Terra Vista Parkway 32-Foot Minimum 37-Foot Average 21-Feet 24-Feet -Town Center Drive 32-Foot Minimum 37-Foot Average Building Separations Two -Story Buildings -Front-to-Front 16-Feet 16-Feet -Side-to-Side 8-Feet 8-Feet Three -Story Buildings -Front-to-Front 40-Feet 20-Feet -Side-to-Side 25-Feet 14-feet Wall Setback — 30-Feet Minimum 20-Feet -Haven Avenue 45-Feet Average Private Open Space -Upper Floor 100 Square Feet 68 Square Feet Due to site constraints, the building separations at a few locations have a greater reduction. E9—E14Pg6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVCPA DRC2016-00715, TTM SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716, ME DRC2017-00159, and VARIANCE DRC2017-00215 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 7 Parking: The project provides 524 parking spaces including 428 spaces in enclosed garages (2 garage spaces per unit), 89 uncovered spaces and 7 spaces in driveways. The base unit count and bedroom configuration is required to provide 524 parking spaces. The project is required to provide 555 parking spaces if all the 4th bedroom options are chosen, resulting in an up to 5.6 percent parking deficiency. The applicant has indicated that from their experience, approximately 50 percent of home buyers will select the 4th bedroom option, reducing the parking deficiency to less than 3 percent The parking study submitted for the project indicates that the current two south bound lanes on Terra Vista Parkway can be reduced to a single lane to provide on -street parking on the west side of the street. Street parking would theoretically add up to 29 parking stalls. A Minor Exception (DRC2016-00716) has been submitted to reduce the required number of on -site parking spaces by up to 5.6 percent. The table below illustrates the required and proposed parking fo¢ the project. Number of Number Code Standard Required Total Required Total Bedrooms .. .•. Parking SpacesParking Two Bedroom 27 2 Spaces/Unit 27 spaces 54 spaces 54 Units 1 Covered Space) Three Bedroom 138 2 Spaces/Unit 276 spaces 276 spaces 276 Units 2 Covered Space) Four Bedroom Units 49 2.5 Spaces/Unit gg spaces 123 spaces 123 (2 Covered Spaces) Guest Parking 214 1 per 3 units 71 Spaces 71 Required Parking with Base Bedroom Count 524 Provided Parking Spaces 524 Total Covered Spaces (Garage) 401 428 Required Parking with Optional 41h Bedrooms 553 524 Parking Shortfall with Optional 41 Bedrooms* (-29) Potential Street Parking on Terra Vista Parkway 29 Percentage Parking Deficit with Maximum Number of 41h Bedroom Options -5.6% Percentage Parking Deficit with 50 percent of 4th Bedroom Options -2.8% * 112 Four (4) Bedroom Units with all 41' Bedroom Option Chosen G. Parking Minor Exception: A Minor Exception (DRC2016-00716) has been submitted to reduce the total required parking by up to 29 parking spaces (5.6 percent). Minor Exceptions permit an up to 25 percent reduction in the required on -site parking. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: 1. Fact: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. Finding: The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is consistent with the General Plan, which has stated policies supporting development projects that require infill development to be designed for pedestrians and automobiles equally, and to provide connections to transit and bicycle facilities (Policy LU-2.2). The proposed project provides E9—E14Pg7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVCPA DRC2016-00715, TTM SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716, ME DRC2017-001k, and VARIANCE DRC2017-00215 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 8 524 vehicle parking spaces as well as secured bicycle parking spaces, and provides convenient access for both pedestrians and automobiles. 2. Fact: The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Finding: The proposed for sale residential development is located at the intersection of two major streets and is adjacent to similar multi -family projects along with office and commercial land uses. 3. Fact: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Finding: The proposed reduction in the parking standards is necessary to allow increased residential density on the project site, which is located adjacent commercial and office land uses and provides convenient access to a transit stop. A parking study (Trames Solutions, Inc.; April 6, 2017) was submitted for the project verifying the adequacy of the proposed number of on -site parking spaces. The parking study provides a number of parking reduction initiatives that have been made conditions of approval including restricting the number of vehicles that may be parked on -site through a parking permit system, HOA inspections of the garage areas verifying that they are available to park two motor vehicles and providing secure bicycle storage areas. Additionally, the applicant will provide up to 29 additional on -street parking spaces that will offset the 29 parking space deficiency. 4. Fact: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. Finding: The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to reduce the required number of parking spaces where it can been demonstrated that the project will provide adequate on -site parking. A parking study (Trames Solutions, Inc.; April 6, 2017) was submitted for the project verifying the adequacy of the proposed number of on -site parking spaces. H. Sound Wall Variance: The project includes an up to 8.5 foot high property line wall along Haven Avenue' and a portion of the south property line for noise attenuation purposes. The proposed sound wall was recommended by the Noise Assessment submitted for the project (Landrum and Brown, Inc., March 31, 2017). The applicant has submitted a Variance for the additional wall height (DRC2017-00215). The findings of facts below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: 1. Finding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. Fact: The increased wall height is necessary due to the project site being adjacent to a major thoroughfare, which greatly increase vehicle noise levels on the project site. Without the E9—E14Pg8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVCPA DRC2016-00715, TTM SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716, ME DRC2017-00159, and VARIANCE DRC2017-00215 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 9 additional wall height, the project site would not be able to comply with the City's outdoor noise standards. 2. Finding: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. Fact: The project site is adjacent to a major thoroughfare with increased vehicle noise levels. The majority of residential development in the City is not exposed to vehicle noise levels in excess of City standards. Finding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Fact: Without an increase in the permitted wall required to increase the building setbacks developable portion of the project site. heights, the proposed development would be from the adjacent roadways, reducing the Finding: The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact: It is common practice to grant a Variance for increased property line wall height for sound attenuation purposes where the project site is adjacent to a major thoroughfare. 5. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact: The increased wall heights will not negatively impact the surrounding property owners as the walls will either face a public roadway or a commercial development owned by the same developer. The walls facing the public view will have a decorative finish. Wall Height Minor Exception: The project includes walls that are over the 6-foot maximum height limit due to an up to 4-foot grade difference between the project site and the existing commercial development to the south. The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception (DRC2017-00159) to permit an up to 8-foot high combination wall along the south property line The findings of facts below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: 1. Fact: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. Finding: The increase in wall height is necessary due to an up to 4-foot grade change between the project site and the existing commercial development to the south. Without the Minor Exception, the applicant would be required to step the retaining walls, reducing the developable portion of the lot and the number of units that could be constructed on the project site. 2. Fact: The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. E9—E14Pg9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVCPA DRC2016-00715, TTM SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716, ME DRC20117-00159, and VARIANCE DRC2017100215 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 10 Finding: The proposed residential development is located on a major thoroughfare that is in close proximity to similar multi -family projects and commercial land uses. Fact: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Finding: There is an up to 4-foot grade change between the project site and the commercial development to the south, which requires the construction of a property line retaining wall. 4. Fact: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health s�fety or welfare o} materially injurious to properties 6r improvement in the vicinity. Finding: It is common practice to permit additional wall height where there is a grade change between adjacent parcels of land. The increased wall height will not negatively impact the surrounding property owners as the developer will be required to install a wall with a decorative finish and the wall will not be out of keeping with other walls in the area. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC) on March 14, 2017. Staff raised two design issues related to requiring optional trellis structures on the bungalow units and adding additional pilasters around the community pool area. The DRC agreed with the applicant that trellis structures should not be required and with staff that additional pilasters should be included around the pool area. The DRC recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission with a requirement to add the additional pilasters around the pool area. K. Technical Review Committee: The project was reviewed and approved by the Technical Review Committee (TRC) on March 14, 2017. L. Neighborhood Meeting: On April 6, 2017, a neighborhood meeting was conducted by the applicant in the clubhouse at the Homecoming Apartment Community (11660 Church Street). No residents attended the meeting. M. SB18 and AB52 Tribal Consultation: In conformance with California State Bill (SB) 18, on December 13, 2016, staff sent a Tribal Consultation Request of the proposed project to a list of tribal communitiesprovided by the Native American Heritage Commission. A letter dated December 16, 2016, was received by staff from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation requesting that a certified Native American monitor be on site during any and all ground disturbances. Staff also sent out a Tribal Consultation request in conformance with California Assembly Bill (AB) 52, on February 22, 2017, of the proposed project to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, the San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. The City was contacted on April 7, 2017 by a representative of the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) requesting that a certified Native American monitor (chosen from a list maintained by SMBMI) be on site during all ground disturbances. A Mitigation Measure was added to the Initial Study requiring that a certified Native American monitor acceptable to both the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — E9—E14Pg10 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVC,�A DRC2016-00715, TTM SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016'00713, ME DRC2016-00716, ME DRC2017-00159, and VARIANCE DRC2017-00215 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 11 Kizh Nation and the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians be on site during any and all ground disturbances. N. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and waste materials, hydrology, water quality, land use and planning and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. FISCAL IMPACT: The vacant project site currently is assessed $62,447 annually in property tax by the county of San Bernardino, with a City share of $3,191 yearly. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the annual City share of the property tax will increase to approximately $7,443 annually. The project will also generate one-time impact fees, which are intended to offset services from the increased development. The following one-time impact fees will be collected by the Engineering Department and are subject to change: 1. Library - $86,884 2. Transportation - $1,204,606 3. Animal Center- $18,832 4. Police - $43,228 5. Park Land Acquisition - $426,860 6. Park Improvement - $383,916 7. Community and Recreation Centers - $261,936 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Plan Exhibit B - Site Plans Exhibit C - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit D - Grading Plan Exhibit E - Landscape Plan Exhibit F - Architectural Plans (elevation, floorplans, roof plans) E9—E14Pg11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVCPA DRC2016-00715, TTM SUBTT200g4, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716, ME DRC2017-00159, and VARIANCE DRC2017-00215 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 12 Exhibit G - Design Review Committee Action Agenda for March 14, 2017 Exhibit H - Existing and Proposed Terra Vista Community Plan Exhibit I - Initial Study Parts I, II, and III Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00715 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2016-00814 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2016-00716 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2017-00159 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2017-00215 CB:TV/Is E9—E14Pg12 m W D _ :�I. 7bK: i' ') RECE.. s VKTI MU FAMI"+MIXED USE i I� �y i S :Er�'+tR �� 1 RIAI.oh 4 1 A ,�,, r• ,i 1 1 It GC < GENERA& }ham COMIEtCIAC `- 10 W2['!W y � UTWTY COMPANIES Ow ER/PE�LORER � �y ou� . .eomu� us o-• MR, EROINEE_R ARCH CT lANO_S£ARE ARCMRECT FOR CONDOMMIUM PI IRPOSES SITE UTILIZATION MAN TENCATIVE'IRACI' NO. 20054 n ffi cnr � K.1N]p auarKa�.ua.�r a zw w..ua..+ LI. so,r i SU-01 m I m_ A l0 Church Street ••- M '.V 94 • / C eassenian Lagani INFORMATIONAL SITE PLAN —-------- _HAVEN AVENUE �S«::«,: r«al mmr. x)• d m how nl ronnv�:. x3a lunsSw Ma 1x., M+n IIirY6rP«ml Moa AeeE lnPt tlunriell Gnu++Wnu,r ii>W/Me A« mr un wa n azaE us aau�u.. •A.... re�.c..n :M WrM a'o,.eSa✓w YsvYo. MEI4 pmws4Uq MJu+ePn� •qm lni.r,W+ MKMAVIM fieuV.n wSWn Pq««�Yn I.wmw an na an �o�« wu u as 9s ,.r .wrwa•.w..«•«.sa. u. rm Pw.t,P...aa.rra w®rma .ai...n.nror... nau m...o«. P..•erru.r�..a�ea, /n«.w w •y « s ta. naw ,w n n•w.w. MZ ,ry, HWE ,aiY+Yl+ , uu wt n�von wrwa.a :w T2.1 Dian +3iWI ,I,WE fWu AWf 6L LY9 c nv. a mw, msu you rr nm Elm um uw m ww m I m a tn W aep� Wd&m s k ' ,.. .e.il npp Gw o m.m..y ps. r r T_ T Y _�n �' •, �� I 4 yasW Bu:ltl:ne :erb,c� - .MeaaurM 4an Curb ' LUIe[[ w 4ppmvri d Comm�nuy P n.�rnamer., Bassentan Lagoni INFORMATIONAL SITE PLAN SP-1.1 ..... .µ.. ,,.,--- HAVEN AVENUE �� Dry.l R�nln CwunmN,GMunu �l y •4 f I 14_. I W' I �I __ I I Y T - _T _ _Y ��/ � I/ 21F,-. &rdmE XmxM M—,d from Curo mgen m Approval w Com—ra, pw Meaur. ham Curt S bE .Appromla Co." Mon Amu�Gnpn[ Bmenian Laganl INFORMATIONAL SITE PLAN SP-1.2 ----- HAVEN AVENUE -. ii=-� s:L lU1i wiNE 4IY�UFRN(rNR NFMNIIST' fSIYPEC`.taFIW �i: usnc ni°y in<...� nwoPmwe I I 4 I gg i I ,W --------------------- � I avl rr71 LjIPTIIi. I I I r i-- : 4 1 ------------ I � [fQXY. IILIIIIX COMPAMES r¢frNo'x: .mv sirtx m�a afti<uy'Ay, .n+.us. v IIFCIGK1 •.v. N e.n..umu: L: i EARIHWOOR"UARMES A ERLDE�[OPER CMIWL— IINEE�ER WA�APanncwrecr Qom e / �k 1 + r 12 32 >/�,� % r, h Ulf CHURCH S%RFEr it 7iu Z3—tl-r `w`.',•... �- �a 1433 34 I v.rss •\��'F � 35 r 31 j/ C rev ' u 30 for a - �-• •'^ '� 27 28 a16 24 / r 22 r.. -tam 19s 20 r 21 r vrsss •.mom `yak s' �K K --� •� a ly S FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TENTATIVE TRACT MAP I > TENTATIVE TRACT NO.20054 1. l Lb...J ' SEE SHFFT3 L—! r�ir. ! 1 .. nixm[mm'enwrocvunrovan, T'apSAv ®st++.wmev m;cuMaasnu r�rOaAC. �ni nM1151':PI6 O � dsGyG�; v � 4ig9�i e o 1-1"J,wj� I FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20054 A�L? • 10 Al 1� .2D16 TTM-03 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSFS I CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO 20054 WT¢ x..N[HO VGM 4 A IMIV FSiN O I):o ncnt.E NwuT v�e� 4f1 i I ♦i -------------------------- "o�i CMACH I Wt / IF a '�"�v _ /j I EARMWGRK OOANTR WTESE FEE r v m s,.l� '.J1 F i OWNER/OEVELOPER aW ENGINEER ARCHITECT LaNpscav�_n�GNrtEcr i. ail UTILITYLOMPANlES rz� SMSHEETS 6 SlRffT ' 11 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSFS . CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20054 w rxs mr aexwcao eew+a vu. cvrvrc or uv nwuvncio oFru oa4u a� r Yvn br. r,�ii.�+4vtM1w4 rar u..r.h F 1210 CAEI' AVOLPMT 16 oo..un CGm02 m X W I 1004 . s:ic �_in� tzrvmlyP. m00 mm® O a M= gym® D=Mm= ODmmO momm© 0�®Max o®oov Omm®© FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20054 TYPICAL BUNGALOW_ GRADING DETAIL —_ --- -- — N.T.S.—. - SECTIONIW SECTION'B'^ .w. SEC ON'C' �. secnoxrD• SEMON•F SECTION'E' TYPICAL ALLEY SECTION DETAR wA TYPICAL2V ALLEY SECTION DETAILu 2W ALLEY WI STD. CURB 8 GUTTER SECTION DETAIL { TYPIWL DWG QJACDRT0BUMNc ' - rJ�iyr+ faw ��fgxal HU.ST�� LIST OF STRUCTURAL LID BMPS — w .. ,......... c ..w t—I-c � _ v •S,tibRuwa l.. Y y� 4P LEGEND. OoLv- saascFE . f a� �—� ,fw.:...•a...�w. WATER QUALITY MITIGATION SUMMARY VS pI51 Ce e. I ---J ulFw 1 I { _ I I 9KlEL1 I I -L. � i � Vag-l]W4tI ranru u eu £BORNE ,. o... a... J/jOWNCEOT -- M1,�eVRESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR MAINTENANCE 8 INSPECTIONS: WM1T zRnF.GIE ¢.varrwmlwme�w...�mvn.rtrua.�vauroa�. asruurwm ncay.Nsaor LINL ENGINEEq ON'NEq/DEVELOPEq a a4 9f/wiRa W[ l D,Q. .— 1 - I I = I F PRELIMINARY I'ENTAU VE RACT NO. 20054 TN6 mr oR x...soa cuc,aNmc,L LvuxaY of san nrxxwoe liiusanrc:ner°ss ..Nousr.mla PLAN tl 3 2 Y F J d j 2 0 oao z 242N Wf,a2 E Z. <z< 3az J CC W O n WOMP-01 TENTATIVE TRAM'NO. 20054 L41Mfi yn NttCS5AIYbYNWWMY Of Yi11Y W61YA11 i. io�M aii A4i!f..v�C CHURCH II `� bRNE GENjE� -10 � EARtNWORK QOANTIMI HMO �C u OWXERIOEVFLORER LIM ENGIN[EN ARCNRE�P lA1j15GAPE AR4MIECT I e T g dam. W '.Tl CF-01 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20054 CHURCH IT. S7,'R8,zr INE: A. z ri War i �u 4�1 EARTHWORK�&- -DUAW mm I T qn. XGFW z ARCk1l WIl ARCHITECT k i — ___— _— I — _�� i I II, v - - - - - - - - - - - - pol if .110 FA-01 m x 2 ou m it lGr nwvuN �� I Yc I`1` -' VANAVR iT� RA CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN OE rAN Dn E.t h -• •..— TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWNS R,h. C..am on6a C. PLANT PALETTE TREES..,�.. ...�.. a. Q;L I.AIr �IKcun nwmE ...ww.. ESEr Pjp 59�Al aCSM YH rY�u SIWIItiEIrFYru 54AW..vNIX-;51� rMl e vyNu 1 xcr uv l,Afkllryf llfMNCfr:hllVl• rrtw�...w�+w mk S.W4hCMAMiKR•,'.Ek• ® I.pnsun I.u..x SFWLw�Y�MIIYFk - SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVERS k M1Na..'SA..n Gv..vi }. .WN.M.hSsp�. " $.- trvc V.I. i✓G Y J 1 I U I FEATURE LEGEND i. rew.,curin sloE«.x IOAu,... r -m I_ mwJrAwlNf:. sfF L`AVNN muziBe,.rua yfEr.• k,iwrYo r...c..vmfsrrw.cross..c: Is wm.ccusunro.wnE<Gnnw I5 iwu Kaae wwiW..mnsAn.;ES .I awlm.n. I+wrm craw <GeAEu "ww SrcareX.E vW cw uua 1 l..wCCf9 pN W5s.5!g15.5ttx I. -GM r4u5Q.nGw4 wIA.91Crf3 ti C$ILIII':KI.Mi.Ra W11X VTFYXF.Stl nll6 AflKlllE I n.w+sE Kcassmen.le rtSmArrf: :d ra wr Mr u.. M'N1Fi.f. vnrn lfYE:.tY,oN!wl! WlFr4`. BIKE STORAGE SPACES REQUIRED rOrMEY.WIFi Ci Cpa51 WVKF5 V1dIG4`U-Yn LANDSCAPE SUMMARY NaWY. G nf£SaF^/lSfp. rri:u vl«Aa155. I] � KaE`. wTnS.EGVPx I'M H✓.LLE M .a bh. r54,:.ia. .w...pAn isdfCw� a May 4 a.m'ym cam. sU m"o Ew WM:."e I� .wcw Iwm W Ycum. �'� ^Wa�..0 vabu !vJ 6b i..W Cnrt W.iay. Wr�s CC+pwY L.� Lyw✓. �r�•V+.++i r,pMuu its e'w,X.ew.,A.puwuoam ww w wsmw.ccus wwmvr mcow5rnwar..,ararca ;ursrtsre.wr.o Kass mrv..n..m5 'ice ARf op wcua..5n arrn.nw.w r.sE wrc« -.: aurnrHowar.rz.a..uac wwN.ww ro.. I e� mox x.rww vnm 51[CIMfI lM vr� .,rwr%puxserr-.raa wek Yuwv mn„wormy, Ol h wa•�+rrt WSrfafln5r4aWV1�3A lrfr3H 52V.MIIGK135 T�GM1Sh'w.0 ei P..Yw aaLLNMfI ]F Cf MIrYKyNICM [EMNEYSMI I.M1O.rrU..Nu:hi -:. Gnoo,r carna.aa.wx..w wGSE.m,; .X- .Yror...aG/nw nc.cc..w.wrtx ss.l..; RECREATIONAL AMENITIES . w..,ri..xn ux.IVSF xA.w w:rx5uac..e.wruvrr. •a�mrw r.mKr %neocrnclo.c rues • wrxry cuAra �...S.c .e. •tO1 Wl M, NS. IM r.1t WLL{1F Ih11p51Q%Kw%PC9YM1W'. ...y,TYy ftVMY,MICI,IMA!%.!r.IA WIMAEa1 W.. . v.ilulen pJr GCnnr L V,Ah D VuHwQ .�T b ---- r,-,T, t �a M V Xd pW i I 4'�JpJEWd N MAW RCN�7ERRA WALL AND FENCE 5 (aN GRki t vM1 DMLE IIOMB TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWNS RanoEu Cuumonp. Ca /_ nu ' wllw Wf1.Y1 Rxnuxvwl nN.x TWCWmx.cllx IM Ivrxnpxwpl 'vIx�1llWNflf IyNNIWp Mu1111W M5ualwl YP OIYIYIW IIN Wpl TT Ib�MIN II NpVpInTMt M iYA ' J GNaXn IYRUW ally I IVY 11 N., 4x],dM WII MI WMXYNYY IMIf]IYyM WpR 1NII�IYN�IXIx xxW34 MYIIWNI r�rsPlxwN ' 4�ali Y1 P IYx1 ITVf x4A WV1 YYMI /.11MYWi IMY'IIf�I Ib. Ya1YxI�.TMlN ,.' aalo vnaavwX a�lM wti MnYlal:Nwax N A.1 ml e pwnsxn .. IpdTvxum MI WNIYV@aI 1n IIV. rfplll lYCWnVM'I WEFT NO L.2 IIYXp( ITN W WUW IxYx uXpt .L. � _ IFRRAW/AA,RyI. `waRI.. L— mfi —u f(f A FF HR y� �Np1 % - v A I f IYVEN AVE �Y MAINTENANCE EXHIBIT VAN DAELE HOMES TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWNS VIP FEATURELEGEND vwvnrE axNER ESAmrnErrtn rsPDs ]i.5o3 L'OFr PRNATE HCEaOAfIER WINTAEEC sEca�wranaEn:,nuF. �lme saFr WATEREFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET PWMrIpI L[0 apP I 1 SHEFT rvJ _L .3 m m A w W O �o,Y PLANT PALETTE TREES 44 wn.ao.uw+r.luXree! 'a.•rW 4NL. •'�`YwO5laFfl r.4 wMY..v Ya.�vNnY �vUR T! l.vireM� ' VINES/ESPALIER � tanas.uvwu. SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVER5 yr•. Lby. YE..,' r....m.se ,M.oT9E .�-WCuv �w Ww uP a.... vm �x�uW.u�r. a• w wo •�Y.+�•lwmYr. wwL8.5ynmr Xrymy. m 1xr ffi AREA ENLARGEMENT .. �.` VAN bmu HOMES <% -�•_-- TERRA VISTA -REC CENTER & TOTLOT PLAY AREA 6aneFo CuumonEa. Ci AND FEATURE LEGEND Aqr �' R45W gIXw9xl.uy,nwi...uY� _ 5.14E SI.LLNl4p WRQY - ie��cn x.5ww. FWWY:E4flCX[O<W4EiF NxM tE('p.Mf YW W KWF V� ClCM.TE.WOFfi wRX.MWM1f NY1.[+_Fli1 F5W4 4 CMMES.�YYaY Y4iu Y}.1mIF.FnmEi �' NaW.[IC..wEiEiIVEiYaV..a'C:4i:: 3 UnP%.IG�+M.1MTt JD[iu4! �i P/1Y U+Mi1M£wiM 4'aRY 04. #.INi IS' bNflMeMl[�lE 1y vAro ss.rme,ur. WmliuYrs uc wtuvuu u.erew �A munc w.urcavxaElCiYafn n.ra al.fCAy wYtss vr.X petY wiu ii. mr rn v...as. • enE.c. n;rlvnrxuwn.su. narTar:.: «. !o. vW.s..musc4�,w si l..uow�m ii aa.Aw 1fK .w:T51MR o Mrv.mE vma..z rarsam un+.x n.�cw KEY MAP %..LT NO L.4 ® ® _ AgEbb, I W W O p Z G) m �C'o m t0 m J t � t PLANT PALETTE FEATURE LEGEND TREES SHRUBS 8 GROUNDCOVERS _ rdtLlM iK:n11M�. �'��•�as•rb6 - ImsM1 COlM1.6 �T ® 4.Ynu1 Y.� Mve�� LvaW1 �� ! uilEWuaay.. •`P.iI�wN+K.. ErtWIFFN YC[ppIRF •v • rv. � iuw4�»f.r Jb Wha4yLm Lnu.Y Z rryiyy iFg KCFsy FiJIIw'.Ru]YYIrIY4 w.Mu.brvrs uL .cmr Y..a MYvor ".Ylf KtSs ="Fs vr�r. .w..s•Yr. �. W WMw r W tRi , � � wapru.• ♦M W�.en>). F: 41Yw».fYfil?NLV'aJFlf wllw DYtYA1M •IWM a[M.. .'nWr�' u,+r I,aMFro.nWui N�¢I.FY44 G� 4fttV.Ipk IWNffs Nllrr RlMw.rsuA.[xlNr vr146 ._, 'PYI -YL SIfFFI IH M .• WY...pyw OAwt[.Yiln �iQ� CSALuiIXW YAI1tiuf. W11XIF.x%: �w'FT^.+'.'� Mym�vy� C'uxr C.pt✓� fHW4DI.YING. RGSR.I. _ ~. MW IN.»sIW 4Tlrvr ltl{ ® x�4 �' � ~�� Wrist GRAx.OI'.4 lw rc.uua I.WEYN. N cvem.Y .+uur VINES ..r�._.fa,e.0 urr'�• >•..n.•rrs.ac..ww a �u �i\-��. � •''�,m �.m mr®.••,•s�++ wmeuu mmrwe:..mFrm.rw.,.aw,,..: 4 a.w-- a a».rlw.rz: vnunXVlwwwnrr�rwwr..,.. � OXLls1MN KCH5w41w.vrE. ry.NY�.ylplurWlfl s MFIKl Vt4511t4.f.MMT.r � !'91Mi CCM144Ml.F.0 WlSM1: � rtRA AREA ENLARGEMENT VMF DAELE HOME ��. ''. ..r..� TERRA VISTA -ROW TOWN HOMES ' _ cfo Cuu money CII. - - - K... KEY MAP Jn '•` sXEET YG L.5 rt 9t � � rin 10-Rrte� l m I m_ A D w N PLANT PALETTE TREFS �'� a ��Y��wSK.NA1Yfw�-• - <vLLilfxWFw�w'. MNY �' amN� mmrt u! 4r. faa�. AREA ENLARGEMENT VAN DAELE HOMES ...... TERRA VISTA -BUNGALOWS Aan<no Cea......' C• I v, :HRUBS & GROUNDCOVERS © �4IsnY� ® Nw H.n4u' y'.Fu .wW�. Sma'Ysr Mu'+r�lu C n Mpa�W y 4"� cdise. d Irm W.�r.vt.4wry ^r �faYu�.Y 'xnT ELla..vu n� Y la M1gs..ymr FEATURE LEGEND anf ..xwh��YlfuU W"l. wW .nIX i11Y.. ��r..'r :' nw01�1lwI RYKYYi U1MwRCUIVwuU 1. n�WNIIY<UISRE�FPeCW UN1fluLL wpL V iY.X'XnMW _ na.�KtEi: u'.814.WYn •g1lM1UP YM K�ES wuPNw.bYRfFwY wI�EWW IWJISw ryi.uAn rslu{yUFroM <iYaxil wtlXO[CC muw:v. y:iaw tit R aWY4.S4W k.wS Ywq aw o w +A Yvranw�%x�oiw '14 xi 4tiY IOYIryUR PEykIg1 i. u.: W�..LvyKftlOYKIFIVO�N�.W6V.nl: TERRA VISTA . r4•.:.. — ..:. PROJECT ENTRY MONUMENT SIGNAGE STUCCO FINISH PERIMETER WALL r-rrTrr1i� 11 t} J1-1_I I l i'.] T"-I l I [tll'-]I INTERIOR 6'-0" HIGH WALL AND 6'-0" HIGH PRIVACY WALL AT ENTRY TUBULAR STEEL ACCESS GATE COURTYARDS Dui ....... ......... �I�IVI GUARDRAIL ON RETAINING WALL mom. 1 �7153eiMo-Wo 337 WaIlm SHADE STRUCTURE AT POOL RECREATION AREA Y&HuFRRA DETAILSAND ELEVATIONS _... . IXA var+wfl¢,anes 'YTERRA VISTA - '.PaaaFeC.umon2a_ Ca 5'-0" HIGH POOL ENCLOSURE FENCING ON RETAINING WALL LED LIGHT FIXTURE FOR PARKING/WALKWAYS 's M 7-7 1uVa. SHADE STRUCTURE AT TOT LOT PLAY AND OPEN SPACE BARBECUE AREA LANDSCAPE AND GREENSCREEN CONCEALING OF A/C UNITS L 7 u 4 PLAN I PLAN PLAN 3 VPRIA i1ON I PLAN 3 v RMIRII()N 3 Bassenian La om ( B U N EI G A L OW TERRA VISTA - PRODUCT "A" R,"L n" C. I.... l,,;,, C, i�-3� sll Islds PLAN I cL.I "'Il vaglA llON f ELFv MNCOLORa ER SANCIMMING SXEki COLOR X.ENES WILL BE OETEAMNED p C 1ME RPIaNING REVIfw PROCESS A Im;-1 VnL. ILI j 1156N Moud C,k1118, llplu,d.CA9 VBe M I t0 Ul Bassenttan t La 9 on i BUNGALOW Composite Plan First Floor _ a TERRA VISTA - I Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. S31.15165 E4UGE .1 1 MROr Covett... n.0 DWWG ❑ 1 ------- .a. EMRY PLAN 3 rso so. Fr. DIAa4E CDua21'aRD RODI'I r� i affCXFN � �^ I = ttRCAL GAMGESEGTON —� n rlsq rrRusrraveEv.[wr FORCra II 1 r r PLAN 2 uuso.Fr. LVD Tem Vat, LLC 1156 N Neuman Avenue UPLW. CA 917M m I m A w w rn OPT. 3RD FLOOR BONUS w/ BA. 3 .rmrwn .ssun, OFT. 3RD FLOOR BONUS w/ PDR PLAN 3 w+so. Fr. Bassenian La Bni B U N G A L O W ... 9wus Cumposlve Plan Second Fleur Rancho Cucnmm... Ca. 531.15165 PLAN I "A SQ E PLAN 2 1.ua so. u. az.1.0 omwc OPT. BEDROOM 2 & BEDROOM 3 w/ BA2 SXEFT rv0 A1.3 m _m A v M LA1 V Baasenil an I Lagoni PLAN I ,I TERRA VISTA t 6. t Ranch. Cucamonga. Ca. 21.IS165 ODUCT "A" ENIRY I i10, 7 TYPICAL GARAGE SECTION .ss, .nnw9nuli.----- PLAN I 1.464 SQ. FT. 3 BEDROOMS I IS MA 2-CARG GE FLOOR AREA TABLE STROOR 955Q. FT. 2ND FLOOR 1,369 SQ. FT. TOTAL 1,161SQ. PT. 2-CAR GARAGE 432 SQ-FT. DE 12SSQ.FT. PORCH 43 SQ. IT. XEET NO. A1.4 LVD Tem Vi- E2C I IS6 N Mawam A— UPland.CA91J86 REAR m - — l0 - _m Q A t0 Lu 00 LEFT , 0 RIGHT PLAN I Bassenianl Lagoni nntmo-ru a a V aIe I El—. ,... TERRA VISTA - P Ranabo Cucamonga. Ca. 21.IS16S FRONT • VARIATION I ----- ------- \ " S I e.a.; wuaue ROOF PLAN .amm�•� NOTE: ELEVATION COLOR SaECiIONS AND BUILDING COLO0.5CXENES WILL BE DETERMINED WRING sMEEi No THE PIANNNG REVIEW PROCESS A I .S LVD m eTVim. LC O 1156 N .A U -C ❑lh CA 91786 m A w w tD REAR LEFT [Eta] gl al 1 rK Q RIGHT BassenianPLAN I ucnnmu.]unra..u9um Variation ] Elevation TERRA VISTA - PRODUCT Rancho Cuumenga. Ca. 61 I., sl6s FRONT • VARIATION r.1 su h I I ! 4 i ' • � numwwu.w I --------------- ROOF PLAN ..u.�u.a NOTE: EIkVgT10N COLOR5E1ECf10NSPND ROROMG sHEeT xo. COLORSC ...LLEEDETERMINFDDURING THEPIANNINGREVIMPROCM A 1 .6 LIN Tem.Avenue I156 N Mmmvm Avenue UphM. CA9V86 REAR rt om, ,I. Q RIGHT P L A N] BasmsenianlLagoni (levagle:l TERRA VISTA - PR Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. 7--irl 531.15165 FRONT ROOF PLAN 4%n rwt:uu 1. ,a[ VARIATION 3 --'u, NOTE - ELEVATION COLOR SE EC]IONS MD BUILDING COLOR SCHEMES WILL BE DETERMINED DURING THE PLANNING REVIEW PROCESS 1T—V LLC 156N UpWC49II86 BassenianlLa oni P L A N 2 . 9 REn.a: va.nnon 1 --•^4 TERRA VIST R.n�ne C.....nu. C, 511.15165 PLAN 2 1436 SO. FT. 4 B ROOMS 13 BATHS 2-CARGA E FLOOR AREA. TABLE ISTPLOOR TS)SQ. Pf. 2No ROOK MSQ. PT. TOTAL ZSQ.Pf. 2-CPR QE 434 SQ. Pf. PORCH 31 SQ. FT. SXEET NO. A1.8 LVO T.rn M•.. LLC I IS6NM—..A,-ue ❑ph .CA 11786 ...�.,.....�._. IM LIM A IM A N REAR LEFT RIGHT Bassenian: La oni PLAN 2 9 Variaalon I Eleravlon _ TERRA VISTA - RannM10 Cucamonga. Ca. 531.15165 FRONT 'O VARIATION I 9 Q ROOF PLAN NOTE: EIEVATIONCOLORSD ONSPNDBURDING SN[ei NO COLOR SCHEMES WR19E DETERMINED WRWG THERANNWGRMV PROC A I 9 on.ae 11 LVD To— Vev. LLC I IS6 N M.... Avenue UpM CA9VB6 ..-+...-__.- REAR LEFT RIGHT Basso nion1La oni PLAN 2 9 v,rm Elnn: Elxra Evan TERRA VISTA - aim Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. 521 .I 5165 Ilk ODUCT "A" ROOF PLAN NOTE: ELWAT ION COLOR 6ElECTONSAND BDRDING COLOR SCHEMES WILL BEOEIERMINED WBWG THE PLANNING REVIEW FROCM SHEET NO AI.10 100 REAR II 4arna:':TnTa Tavr aa' rtv nrnanav {y}YyT ��Cii�y[jT��ih�JS{gg,.FT{�, �.j, �••�iAi*�T .T.fLTtil4:91'gJi'A1TJi1V11111{JF1111}jtl'.{ 'J�LTirl}j�i� I LEFT r RIGHT Bassenian l La ani PLAN 2 9 VarlauonI Elevation u[en[nn• nuraa n uv t TERRA VISTA - PRODUCT W' n aneno �uenm nga e.a. — n511.15165 4 ROOF PLAN NOTE: ELEVATION COLOR SB-C OM DBUILDING Sn EET [uo COLOR SCHEMES WILL BE DETERMINED DURING THEM NGREVIEWMaas. A I . I I LVO Tema vlm LLC 1156N M.—In Avenue UpWa CA 9178S m Lo A Ln 1-3 Elm E. a� wrnr ;, owr Bassaniiaan!Lagani I P L A N 3 .'........,.,�a.a �-..�"uT F R R A 3 Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. SI1.15165 C' PLAN 3 15 9 SQ. ET. 3 RLORCK)MO RATX51 DEN 2-CARGARAGE FLOOR AREA TABLE M KOOR 18R 5Q. ET. 3ND KA R )695Q. FT. TOTAL I.H95Q. FT. I-CARGARAGE 1115Q. Fi. LVO Tern Vho. LLC 1156NMournAmue Upland CA 91786 SXEET NO. A1.12 m to I _m A v 4 A rn REAR LEFT trio a L RIGHT BassenianlLagoni P LaA N1 Eleraalco TERRA VISTA - PRO[ Rancho Ouca mon8a. Ca. S31.I S16S FRONT VARIATION I ROOF PLAN .own.nw,.r�rmcu,rn� NOTE: ELEVATION COLOR SELECTIONS F DBURDINO COLOR SCHEMES WILLBE DETERMINED WRING THE PLANNING REVIEW PROCESS VIm. LLC SXEET NO A1.13 o x. x T. n REAR m I m_ -- �P A V LEFT ■I l�� RIGHT Bassenianl Lagani PLAN Elera aT rinn TERRA VISTA - PRO[ Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. S21.15165 FRONT VARIATION 2 ROOF PLAN NOTE: U ATION COLOR SELECTIONS AND BUILDING COLORSCHEMESWILL MDEf INMWRWG THE PIANNING REVIEW PROCESS LVD Tema Vnm. LLC 1156N M—u nAvenue Uphnd. CA 91786 5 EET NO A1.14 m LO LD v W REAR Tr T T T In*.# *djj'.i :u7iai g 195f��aYTiL'. LEFT RIGHT Bassenian1La ani PLAN 3 9. Vanauon 3 Elevaalo TERRA VISTA - PROD l� L Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. S21.15165 FRONT VARIATION 3 ca. In- 1-1 aclo ROOF PLAN NOTE: EEBVATION COLOR SELECTIONS MD BOLDING COLOR SCHEMES WILL BE DETERMINED WRING T E BANNING REYIPV PROCESS ) Tem VBv, LLC Mounom A.nuue Ullan .CA 91786 SXEET NO AI.IS 02 27 1 Baasaniaa Lagos I BUILDING , E'A' 3- P L E X TERRA VISTA - ROW TOW a a::oRu Curomenp. Ca. " i 1 I I 531 IS166 N_O_TE_ ELEVATI COLOR SELECTONS ANO WIIONG ,pZ KMENEC WILL BE OETERWNEOIxHtI.0 THE MNNING REVIEW PROCESS A 'Z . 1 LWTmra Vwa. LLC 1156 N Mv:um Armuc UptiM.G91 ]B6 Bassenian `Logan I B U IpL D I N G ' A' Floor Ran.no Cucamonga. Ca. 2i.m66 3-PLEX W TOW SECOND FLOOR m FIRST FLOOR Unity Unit UnitI TYRCFL GR0.AGE�ECT� LVOTcma " 15 NwneInra Mln Avm U,brn CA919E6 XEET NO A2.2 THIRD FLOOR Unit Unit Unit SHEET NO Rassenian!Lagoni B U IpL D I N G 'A' 3- P L E X A2.3 mono TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWNS Rnn<m c�<n men u. co 15LVD T va VI5ry�521. 15166 6NM nanED, Lt< y , _ 111. nE anac.ac a. CL d:,. a. 111 Ban"= Lagoni BUILDING Q' A' 3- P L E X TERRA VISTA - ROW TOW Rancho Cucamon P. Ca. 511.15in, i Ll EIfVM M &IRE Ns ANo BUaaNG CCIaR $CMf11F5 W1LL 9[p[T[0.ryINFD DIMING � SMEET Iln THEruNlrnG ae�Fw MCCE% A 2.4 o] Il LV Tem Vnu. LLC l%NMounnA— m tat In Ln W Bassenian: La oni B U I L D I N G ' A 9 Side Elevation & Roof Plan ��•—n--- TERRA VISTA _ Raocbo C—rnen,, Ca.. 531:15166 3-PLEX ROOF PLAN NOTE. ELEVA90NCOLORSEIElTON5PNO8NLOING SNEET NO COLORSCNENFSN MDETERMINEDWRING THE PI NG REVIEW PROCESS A 2. 5 LLC v. 1 m A A Bassenian Lac—i� BUILDING' B _TERRA VISTA - AanaAe C.c.... P. Ca - LZTt521.1516E 4-PLEX Y n NIPiiON I •RIATION 7 NOTE ELEVATION [OLOR SftECTONS ANO BIAIDMG GOLO0. ECXFf¢$WILL Bf pEiEAMIJFp ptlplNG SXEEI HO „1E f1ANItNG REV4W MOCESS. A2.6 LVO T— Y ., LLC 119E N M-- Acme upb U9,m ®� 1�: n,��, - 1L•1111111v1�111 .r� SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR Unity Unic3 Unic2 Wit aulc Bassenian I Lam oni BUILDING ' B' 4- P L E X n.aouu2 Floor Plan - Varmuon 1 TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWI a;""�' M. ii • Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. ' 521.15166 n TYRCNG GESECYION LVDTam Viso. LLC 1156 N Mounvm Avrnue Upland CA 91786 HEFT NO. A2.7 02.27 rF Bassenian!La 9ani BUILDING ' B' uo.mnNt-mn,at.��an Flnor Plan - Vanauun I a � 1, I� 4-PLEX THIRD FLOOR Unit 4 U.":3 Unit 2 Unic I SNEET NO A 2:1 - TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWNS Rancho cncamunea. Ca. on.v ULC LN M—.. o,nuc ' S11.15166 1156NMan:om Amnue Ul 1-1111-1 1 -1 FRONT R Baasenian'Lagoni I BURIRLRDEI N Glon B sEI R4 - P L E X TERRA VISTA ROW TOWI Ranch. Cuaamen., Cn. S11.I S166 ]IBI® VARIATION I umiall MEMEMIMMISM NOTE. ELEVATION COLOR SELECTIONS AND BUILDING COLOR SCHEMES WILL eE DETERNINED DURING THE PLANNING REVIEW PROCESS LVDT—Vno. LLC 156 N Fk,.—. Avenue Uphnd. CA 917E6 FS-.7 NO A2.9 IrMu® I RIGHT Bassenian I La 9oni BUILDING ' B' 4- P L E X a n:amo-ruuvo-nyea Side Elevation R Roof Plan - Vanac on I •� TERRA VISTA - ROW TOW1 Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. S11AS166 ROOF PLAN VARIATION I NOTE: ELEVATION COLOR SELECTIONS AND BUILDING snEEi rvo COLOR SCHEMES WILL BE DETERMINED WRING THE PLANNING REVIEW PROCESS A2.10 LVO Tern Nto, LLC I B6 N Mounnm A—u. Upland CA 91786 CIO I___I � � . '�� •,' ,., "„ dl ■ ' I Y� i��@spgajIMMI _ SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR Wk4 Unic3 Until Until easse�nian Lagoni I FI U IRL D I.,.G< ' B' 4- P L E X -- TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWI nnuL cnancg sgcnoN Ran<Eo Cucamonga, Ca. LT<m Vim.UC ' Stl.lg166 1156N M< - 917U Up6nd CA91]B6 EXEET NO A2.1 I 6 :�unnm �veeIo THIRD FLOOR Unit4 Unit U16E2 UnnI NEET NO 9assenianILaoni BUILDING 'B'. 4-PLEX A2.1'2 fICCf Fl.n vi.l2Tlnn x TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWNS LN MTo .Vnt,. LLC ' St 1.15166 IIS VD T, Up.n6.0 9786 I' C _- - Fill o C n= mow VARwnONx .L-L-L It __ 9assenian 1 Lagani BUILDING ' B' 4- P L E X a F n e R Rear Elevation - Variation 1 P °-- TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWI R... nn C..amonen, Ca. S21.15166 1i J I I NOTE: ELEVATION COLOR SETKpONS MD BUMING SHEET NO COLOR SQ ENFS WILL BE DETn IPIMD WMG TNERurvnwc RErtEw RR«Ess A2. 13 L-i, 1r A1Vti LLC I156N Terrae UpBnd.CA9U86 _... ■■ 1R1.N.�, Bssseni`en�Lag am BUILDING 'B' 4-PLEX 9 s1a6 fle.aaleP R Roof Plan - Vaauuen 1 TERRA VISTA - ROW TOW Rane6e Cuaamenp. Ca. �—!�— :1 S21.15166 ROOF FLAN VARIATION 2 NOTE F ATI COLOR 54ECTIIX.K MDRYLLNNG COLOR SCHF545 WY1 BE DETSMWD DLMRUD - - - A 2 . 14 WO To-Nm. LLC 1156NNounoinA. Bassenion La oni I BUILDING ' C' Finn, Eleraunn RRnUIa Cueamenp. Ca -i s]I.15166 5-PLEX NOTE. N ATION COLOR SELECTONS MO BUILOMG SryEEI 1. MOB SCHEMES WILL BE DFTERNMED OURINC THEM .NG RMEw MIO M A 2. 1 5 LV Tern vnu, LLC I156 N Mwaivn Rrnue upl G"'" I� m tD A v m A Bassenian+Lagani BUILDING 'C' Floor Plan TERRA VISTA - Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. 521.15166 5-PLEX SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR UnitI Unit Umt3 Unit unit TY%CAL GNMGE SECTION S XEFT NO. A2.16 m I A L <D cn ul OPTION ROOF DECK Unit2 Unit Univ2 — e Unit I Bassseenian; Lagoni I B U IPL D I N G' C' 5- P L E X Floornn• EUEtEE n «, TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWI• THIRD FLOOR Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 2 Unit I SHEET ND: A2.17 R..<h. Ca. LVD um vnm. u< ' 521.15166 1156 N Mmmmm Avenue UphM. CA 91I86 ..._...�.._�.� FROM REAR Bassenian; La oni BUILDING ' C' 5- P L E X nennE r.......... Front R Rear Elevation TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWt 44;; Rancho C. ax m o n. a. Ca. 511.15166 m C mn:= 1 " � `. .� Y1 a,�.. .r�l? 1 u E- r��rnenrxa': aunnLxurn:unr 1S• — i?ci4ylu C � i%3FR��MiaJi�a rot E3 'k�ll� Js iB n NOTE: ELEVATION COLOR Sa ONS AND BDRDING COLOR SCHEMES WN.BE DETERMINED MENG THEPL N:NGREVIEWPROCESS SNEFT NO. A2.18 o1.x n. LLC Av "1T06 m A v t0 rn V ROOF PLAN BU Bessenianl Legoni ILDING 'C' S-PLEX S a. E,. I.a Roof ela f.�flRn:�IY4:ai�YlIG01f TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWI nano cucanonEa. ca. r 511.15166 NOTE: ELEVATION COLOR SFI 01,45AND BUILDING 6XEET NO COLONSC11E WUSEDETERMIN MMG TMEeuwrvwc aEvlev eaoau A 2 . 19 LVD TarnM 11C 1156 N M—.. Avmue Uphn1CA91186 ti A. z FRONT O 4'rC�A.�.IiEA � a� •Y a REAR ,,assenian' La oni BUILDING ' C' 5- P L E Xe 9nn Front & Rear Ele aon -MUnla I Bonus 3rd Floor TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWNS Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. 511.15166 I,sonI. Nw." NOTE ; ELEVATION COLOR SS-ECTONS AND 0U11DING COLOR SCHEMES WILL BE DETERHINEO WRWG EET uo H THE ANNWG& MPROCESS oa-v IF Upland, CA 91786 kLL LEFT O U L RIGHT J O 1 Bassenian i Lagoni I BUILDING ' C' S- P L E X hCQtnlam....Y. g a', Side Elevation & Roof Plan wl Unit I Bonus lyd Floor TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWNS Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. c > ,521.15166 ROOF PLAN w/ UNIT I BONUS 3rd FLOOR NOTE: ELEVATION COLOR SELECTIONS AND BUILDING sNEET No. COLOR SCHEMES WILL BE DETERMINED DURING TMEPIANNINGREVIEVJPROCESS. A 2 . 2 I m LD FRONT no a m Bassenian Le ani BUILDING 'C' 5-PLEX Front & Rear Elevation A . wl Opt Roof Deck TERRA VISTA - ROW TOW Ran. Re C...rncr,�,.Ca. S :66 FL I r r JIM ca, I bnn'r �ER —Vol 'low C I is J_L_L Im wmAl Im NOTE ELEVATION COLOR SEl£CDONS AND BUILDING MCET NO COLOR SCHEMES WU_ BE DETERMINED DURING THE FlUaNNING REVIEW PROCESS Bassenian�La Dni BUILDING 'C' 5-PLEX 9 S1Ge Elevauan R Roo( Plan - wl OPL Roof Deuk TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWN - Renenu Cuoamun,, Cu. 511.15166 ROOF PLAN W/ OPT. ROOF DECK NOTE: ELEVATION COLOR SELECTONS AND BURDING Fs -.-.ET No COLOR SCHEMES WILL BE DETERI9NED WRWG THE PIAFBJNG REVIFN PROCESS. A 2 . 23 LVD Tem Ve.. LLC 1156 N Muunvin Avenue UpUM. CA 91786 • . _ 4 Bauenian Lagoni BUILDING En' D' 6- P L E X TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWN 321.IS166 NOTE ELEVATION COLOR 9ELECTIONS ANp BUILpING SnEEi N(i ChOR SCnfHES WLL M DETFAnNFD d/RING THE %ANNING REVIEVa PROCESS A 2.24 Lw rcn, wu. LLC 1156 N Mm.xain M.— UI CA 91 UA m _m v Q V W TYMCPl cnancEs�rn�oN eo.ru.ana.�. _..... n mm SECOND FLOOR TPIN — on Y FIRST FLOOR Unit 4 Unit 3 Unit 3 Unit 3 Unit 3R Unit 4R Bassenian;:ageni I B U IpL D I N G ' D' 6- P L E X Floorn, an TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWNS (- R... no Cucamonga. Ca. 516.15166 M Tema Neu LLC o 1156 N Mamm gvemm Uptv,6. CA 917% EMEET NO. A2;25 �[� L_ •�•� M � �'�1111111 C� � � !9 Q Fqc�� IIIIII�"'I�®d i ps Un_c 4 eassenianylagoni I FI U p LND I N G' D' 6- P L E X a man555eniaea,La ae5 TERRA VISTA - ROW TOW<` Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. f-4 511.15166 THIRD FLOOR Unlc3 Unit Unic3 UniT 3R Unit 4R LVD Term Mum, LLC I1S6NMOu UMM o LN1a,6. CA91966 SXf ET NO A2.26 FRONT 0 REAR Bassenian t Lagoni I B UE IRLRD I EN eG o' D' 6- P L E X TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWNS [aa Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. S11.15166 oC (uyom. IC:C CC:'= CCU'r is = 4 a�.K.. ° �i u m na °I a : O D NOTE: EEEVAMONCOLORSFLECnONSANDBIIMM Mn COLOR SCHEMES WILL BE DETERMINED WNNG THEPIANNNG REVIEW PROCESS. A 2 of 1] I) LVDTem Visv.LLC 1156 N Mounon Avenue Upland. CA 71786 ROOF PLAN 11M n— Basseniian lI La9 Sloni l BUILDING I D I 6-PLEX de Elevanon 8 Roaf Plan TERRA VISTA ROW TOW<` nan.m cmomon[a. ca. 521.15166 ;"T 1 .._, NOTE: EE£VATIONCOLORSEEECDOMANOBUlLDING 6XEET rvo COLOR SCHEMES WILLBE DETERMINED CUMNG THE FIANNING REVIEW PROCESS A 2.2 8 LVO T..a V� LLC 1156 N M—ra. Are�ue Uphnd.CA917B6 Baasenien Laoni A I BUILDING 'E' - 7-PLEX ,,,,n, El..al,00 ---- --• TERRA VISTA . ROW TOWT NOTE. F ATWN COLOR SFFELTONS AND & AIDING COLOR KXEMES WILL RE DETEAMNED OLMtl G SX(F 1_NG TXE "N.G RMM PROCUS A 2. 2 9 Ran. M10 Cuumoep' Ca LvO Tm ra vlu. LLC c'�T=a 521 I511b I I56N IIIAN. CqiR uCA A 1MR, 9B6 27.11 m uo I A L to V OD TYRGALGARAGE 5ER10N m VAnaaryRw4m�Wa --... LJ , �I ��) � 11 � ■i�i �� 11 �I ��_ 111 � �� -'! 1� � -,9 EI �� ICI .1 �� ;� ■, �I 11 �s �, _ I I, I I � r� A■ T i ,� �_ �. SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR Unit4 Univ3 Lima Univ3 Unit Unit Unit 1-0 Bassenian; Lageni I FBU I LnD I N G IF 7- P L E X — AI 2. 3 01 nnna TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWNS 9saa v Rancho C...—,.. Ca. LVD Tem Vim.Mlgm ue S 21.15 1 66 1156 N M.-tan Avenue JIC 91786 ..._...—.—_._ OPTION ROOF DECK Unit 4 Unk 3 113. Urn 3 Unit 3 Unit 2 Unit 1 i Unit 4 Unit 3 Ba�sani`anlLagonil Flooror PLnDING 'E' 7-PLEX .munnN nJ11a ,1 1., t TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWI 0990Rancho Cucamony6. Ca. 511.15166 THIRD FLOOR Unit 3 Unit 3 Unit 3 Unit 2. Unit I LVDTa. V. LLC 1156NM..A. UFhn6.CA917R6 REAR Ila eni' anlLegonil Eg U a s�.�EN.ar'la� E TERRA VISTA Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. 521.15166 7-PLEX 1IN NOTE: ELEVATION COLOR SELECnONS AND BUILDING COLOR SCHEMES WILL BE DETERMINED DURING THE PLANNING REVIEW PROCESS. SXEET MO A2.32 ROOF PLAN 9a�seseni�anLa9.aaniDIG l BUILN'E' 7-PLEX Sidennranao- Ee EIefl Roof Plan TFRRA VISTA - ROW TOWI R—ho Cuaa men La. Ca. rr 511.15166 NOTE: EUMMON COLOR SELF ONS AND BUILDING COLOR SCME116 WILL BE DETERMINED DURING TM¢P NNG REVIEW PROCESS A2? 331 I REAR A ■ owl 7 M -ol I I I I ---- • § [msw -_r -4 1- 1111- i I I -:go I I - -mm �-; I Bmenianl La oni BUILDING ' E' 7 - P L E X CwIROOE DEC R OPTION) lan'. Lagon & Rea[ Elerauon [ [ n¢u t�[W n4mmp[ TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWNS Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. t= 521.15166 ff Mlarl 0 Mfwp. I NOTE: ELEVATION COLOR SEIECTIONS AND BURDING snEEi rvo COLOR SCMEIIES WILL BE DETERMINED WRWG T EP4ANNINGRE W PROCESS LVD rem Vnn LLC I56 N Mouman Avenue .Z CA 91786 .., , I Baasseni, an!Lagani I g U L D I N G ' En' uninnerz aa�s Sld Ee a Ion & Roof Plan TERRA VISTA Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 511.t S166 7-PLEX (wIROOF DECK OPTION) ROOF PLAN NOTE: EIMATION COLOR SEUEMONS AND BUILDING SX[[T NO COLOR SCHEMES WILL BE DETERMINED DURING THE PLANNING REVIEW PROCEEK A 2. 3 5 LVD T— Vrsm. LLC I ISa N Mo..,. Avenue Upb.d, CA 917B6 eam.nianLa,o I BUILDING 'F' 7-PLEX TERRA VISTA - ROW TOW 0.ana6e CucamenEa. Ca 331.15166 NOTE ElEV2T1UN COLOP SELKTIONS MID BIIILUINL COIDR SCHEMES WILL OE OETEPMINEP DURWG -- THE PIANNING REVIEW PROCESS — A 2 . 3 6 LVO Tenn v.ruGC , 156 N PLurl V /ry LL URW6U9I>9e ��. ��i��, �® � il� i� �h ilI ill fin. �I �� n� s1 - �� ,= SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR Unit 2 U14C 3 Urn, 3 Unit3 uni, 2 Unit I SXEET NO. Bassenian I Lagani I BUr IPlLDING 'F'. 7-PLEX IA2.37 Flooan TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWNS ux.xx ix Rancho C,camonE:., Ca. M Tom Vism 11C 1 S2 . 5 166 B6 N M.unamn A,"., THIRD FLOOR Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 3 unit 3 Bassenian, Lagani B U I pl.L D I N G ' F 7-PLEX Fl... . TERRA VISTA - ROW TOW R—eh. Cr. 5 166 Unic 2 u6t I LVD T,. VT LLC 1156NMoune,inA, me U,bnd. � 91706 A2.38 m A v 0 W v 171 1 . r ■ ■■I ■■■ ■ ■■■ ■■I ■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■ a u�� I t r ` 1 1 1 e a.nnn iri _.1 An' �■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■ ■■■ ' ■ ■■■ ■ ■■■ R ■� -- WE ■1 ■■■ ■ ■■■ ■■■ ■.■ ■ ■■■ ■■ ■■ h ■■ t■ ■ no Ml- on IN on ON i� FRuN: LL-1 I IMF. - �ttenHnLaonil BUILDING 'F 7-PLEX TERRA VISTA - ROW TOWNS Rancho Cucamony. Ca. Now t- —I=-- 'A 52I.IS166 NOTE. E.EVATbNC SEIK,IFNG &ALUING colon SCNEMES WRL Bf omft[amrsofl RM TnEPLa NW REY'MrROCESS. A2.39 cnu EEC 1156N pa njnmaA.<nu< ll{pn4cq 9178! .._..- m I A t0 00 00 Basenian�Lagani I BUILDING 'F 1 7- P L E X Side Elevation R Roo( p TERRA VISTA - ROW TOW Ran. he Cucamonga. Ca. �—f—� 521.15166 ROOF PLAN NOTE: E ARON COLOR Sa£CnONSANO WILDING COLOR SCHEMES WILL M DETERMINED DURWG SM[[T NO THE BANNING RLVIEW BIOCESS A 2.4 0 ., v.17 1156 N M—tiun Mewe Uphne.CA91M m i\ _m A v t0 00 w LI «ter~ Mgr / - .'�/ BJq F3 L MTq WNf mr�rnr i l�- I� Ba3mian�Lagoni l RECREATION CENTER TERRA VISTA Ran<M1e C.<amen p. Ca. �— _-A 5EI.IS223 waeus UK WE REC CENTER 1712$0.:i.. FLOOR AREA TABLE _ touNGE UA aamres CEMEA 11us0-ET _ _ �� __ EXBSOSE RA5510ON T A sMSQ mso t0. FT 1 TOM DI T6TN CdJDIiroNSPnCE NtiTno 114 E�1115Q. POCI EQIHAm IVSQ TQTPx U±KC TKKJ9!FCE .-S"5 ET.' FROM m A C) O easmiaalagom RECREATION CENTER + TERRA VISTA - Rana M1a Cuumonta. Ca i-4-4-=i 52, 1511 S NOTE_ FL£VAigN COLOR SELFCTWNS ANO &IILOIN4 COLOR SCHFM w BE OETFRMNED =l TaiE ,A. NG REVIEW MOCESE. IEF RIGHI BassenianLagoni RECREATION CENTER TERRA VISTA e Ent Ro C......... Ca H—T— 5 n 15 315 ROOF PLAN NOTE. ELWAnON COLOR Y RZPQNS AND BRALDWG COLOR SCH'HM WILL RE DETERMINED DORINC TM MNNING REVIEW %bCIM SHUT NO A3.3 / MARCH 14, 2017 - 7:00 P.m. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Ray Wimberly X 7:00 P.M Rich Macias X Candyce Burnett Donald Granger X Alternates: Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca Additional Staff Present. Mike Smith, Senior Planner; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Dominick Perez, Associate Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS None This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. Page 1 of 4 E9 EXHIBIT G —E14Pg92 Irl Mf\lil I I -ry LV I I - .vv F.IVI. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA : _ ► an CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE C1. SIGN PERMIT DRC2017-00106 - KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. - A request to remove an existing illuminated wall sign and replace with two (2) new illuminated wall signs on an existing retail store (Target) located within the Community of the Terra Vista Community Plan at 10576 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1077-423-15. The Committee briefly discussed the project and recommended approvall with no issues C2. DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2017-00071 - NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL - A request to modify Design Review DRC2008-00909 by deleting a Condition of Approval, in Planning Commission Resolution No. 14-05, that required an access easement on the subject property as part of the approval for the construction and operation of an animal hospital in the General Commercial (GC) located at 7289 Amethyst Avenue - APNs: 0202-161-10, -11, and -20. Related file: Design Review DRC2008-00909. Staff presented background on the Design Review application that was approved by the City in January 2014. The applicant's reason for requesting the deletion of the subject condition of approval was explained. The presentation included a background on the applicant's efforts to comply with the condition of approval, and the difficulty he encountered while attempting to acquire the signature of the neighboring property owner that was needed for access easement. Staff also explained his attempts to assist the applicant. The Committee recognized that the applicant and Staff had exhausted the available means for obtaining the signature. The Committee recommends to the Planning Commission the approval of the deletion of the subject condition of approval. C3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00814 - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low - Medium (LM) District (4 - 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1089-031-36. Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Development Agreement DRC2017-00156, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Staff provided a project overview to the Committee and raised 2 design issues regarding adding additional trellis structures of the select windows and additional board and batten siding on the south elevation. The applicant stated that they had no issue with addition of the requested architectural enhancements. The Commissioners recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review with the agreed upon architectural enhancements. C4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20042 - NH WEAVER LANE, LLC - A request to subdivide 18.2 acres of land into 26 lots for the purposes of developing 26 single-family residences for a site located on the east side of Carnelian Street Page 2 of 4 E9-E14Pg93 MARCH 14, 2017 - 7:00 P.m. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE and north of Hillside Road in the Very Low (VL) District (A - 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) and within the Hillside Overlay District -APN: 1061-261-01. Related records: Hillside Design Review DRC2016-00377, Variance DRC2016-00748, Variance DRC2017-00014 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00376. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00377 - NH WEAVER LANE, LLC - A request for site plan and architectural review of 26 single-family residences on 18.2 acres of land related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20042, located on the east side of Carnelian Street and north of Hillside Road in the Very Low (VL) District (1 - 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) and within the Hillside Overlay District - APN: 1061-261-01. Related records: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20042, Variance DRC2016-00748, Variance DRC2017- 00014 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00376. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Staff provided a project overview to the Committee. Commissioner Macias asked staff whether each lot provided an adequate area for a horse corral that met the required 70-foot buffer from the neighboring residences. He also stated that he wanted staff to provide the Commissioners with an update at the Planning Commission outlining how the future homeowner would be informed about the maximum permitted lot coverage. Staff informed the Committee that each lot would provide the required horse corral area at the required separation distance from the neighboring residences. The applicant, Bryan Avilla, then provided the Committee with a brief overview on the design of the project site and stated that they would provide the new property owners with a disclosure statement outlining the maximum lot coverage. The meeting was then opened for public comment. Joseph Cowan, president of the Alta Loma Riding Club, asked whether project density was calculated from gross lot size and stated that the Alta Loma Riding Club was concerned the project only provided 1 point of access, that the equestrian trail system did not loop and that the lots that were near maximum lot coverage would not be able to construct a covered corral area. Staff stated that lot coverage was calculated from gross lot size, as required by the Development Code. The applicant stated that the stream bed running through the site limited providing a loop trail and that the property owners of the public street to the east were opposed to a street connection with the project. A second member of the public, Mrs. Judith Brennan, asked whether the project would provide an equestrian connection to Carnelian Street and asked whether a horse trail could be provided adjacent to the east property line, so horses and walkers would not be required to walk in the street. Staff stated that the project would provide 2 equestrian connection points to Carnelian Street and would have the applicant investigate whether it was technically possible to provide an equestrian trail along the east property line. The Committee then recommended that the project move forward to the Trail Advisory Committee for their review and to Planning Commission for final review. Page 3 of 4 E9-E14Pg94 MARCH 14, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE C5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00713 - LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit multi -family development on 12.1 acres of land within the Medium High (MH) District (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway - APN: 1077-422-97. Related records: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Minor Exception DRC2016- 00716, Minor Exception DRC2017-00159 and Pre -Application DRC2016-00361. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Staff provided a project overview to the Committee and raised 2 design issues regarding adding additional pilasters around the pool areas and wood trellis structures to the front elevation of the carriage unit, which are currently a homebuyer's option. The applicant agreed to add the pilasters around the pool area and wants to leave it up to the homeowners as to whether they wanted to purchase the trellis structure to the front elevation of the carriage unit as an option. They went on to state that at a similar project that they recently constructed, no homeowners selected the trellis structure option. The Commissioners agreed with the applicant that the trellis structures would not be required. The Commissioners recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review with the addition of pilasters around the pool area. D. ADJOURNMENT e ..� The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist II with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on day, Thursday, March 2, 2017, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Jennifer Palacios Office Specialist II City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 4 of 4 E9—E14Pg95 m The above site development standards apply to the building site, which is the cluster development as a whole or a designated portion of it. They govern the relationship of the cluster development to adjoining property and to adjoining streets and open spaces. Within the cluster development, the relationship of buildings to one another, to property W lines, and to other features, such as open spaces and private streets, is governed by the provisions of the Uniform Building Code. The above trail_ setbacks, however, are applicable within the development if a master -planned trail occurs interior to the site. Medium High Density Residential Land designated as Medium High Density Residential is intended for residential development that ranges from 14 to 24 dwellings per gross acre. The following regulations apply. M ® Uses permitted: 4, (a) Multifamily dwellings, including, but not limited to, apartment projects, condominium projects, and M cooperative apartment projects. (b) Single family attached dwellings. (c) Community facilities as specified below. (d) Accessory uses as specified above. + Site development standards: (a) Building site area: 1 acre minimum. EXISTING (b) Building setbacks: As indicated in Table V-4. (c) Garage, carport, and accessory building setbacks: As indicated in Table V-4. (d) Setbacks for uncovered parking: As indicated in Table VA. (e) Building site width and depth: As permitted by required setbacks. (f) Building site coverage: No maximum subject to Development Review Process. (g) Building height: 45 feet maximum. (h) Building separations: The standards from the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code shall apply. The above site development standards apply to the building site, which is the development as a whole or a designated portion of it. They govern the relationship of the development to adjoining property and to adjoining streets and open spaces. Within the development, the above standards govern building separation and setbacks from master -planned trails. Otherwise, within the development, the relationship of buildings to one another, to property lines, and to other features, such as open spaces and private streets, is governed by the provisions of the Uniform Building Code. (High Density Residential development standards discussed on page V-18). REVISED Amendment No. 6. MWd-Family Amendment V-15 (b)Building setbacks: As indicated in Table V-4. (c)Garage, carport, and accessory building setbacks: As indicated in Table V-4. (d)Setbacks for uncovered parking: As indicated in Table V-4. (e)Building site width and depth: As permitted by required setbacks. (f)Building site coverage: No maximum subject to Development Review Process. (g)Building height: 45 feet maximum (h)Building separations: The standards from the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code shall apply. A (1) The following development standards are required for new developments with greater than 200 units*: • Street Setback - Up to 75% reduction of streetscape requirements • Building Separations - Up to 75% reduction from the related building separation requirements • Wall Setbacks - Up to 75% reduction from the related wall setback requirements • Private Open Space - Up to 35% reduction from the related private open space requirements. Recreational amenities shall be enhanced to provide additional features and service to residents offset the loss of private open space. *Subject to review and approval by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission per Section 17.20.040 (Design Review) of the Development Code. The above site development standards apply to the building site, which is the development as a whole or a designated portion of it. They ,govern the relationship of the development to adjoining property and to adjoining streets and open spaces. Within the development, the above standards govern building separation and setbacks from master -planned trails. Otherwise, within the development, the relationship of buildings to one another, to property lines, and to other features, such as open spaces and private streets, is governed by the provisions of the Uniform Building Code. (High Density Residential development standards discussed on page V-18). REVISED Amendment No. 6, Multi -Family Amendment V-15 PROPOSED Print Form ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM r=' (Part I - Initial Study) RANCHO CUCAMONGA (Please Type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move, from one line to the next line.) Planning Department (909) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not b�deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part'11 as required by'CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: Haven Avenue Name 6 Address of project owner(s): LVD Terra Vista, LLC 1156 N Mountain Ave Upland, CA 91786 Name 6 Address of developer or project sponsor: LVD Terra Vista, LLC 1156 N Mountain Ave Upland, CA 91786 Updated 4/1112013 DRC 2016-00713 Page 1 of 10 E9—E14Pg98 Contact Person &Address: Adam Collier, Project Manager 1156 N Mountain Ave, Upland, CA 91786 Name & Address of persompreparing this form (if different from above): Telephone Number: 909-946-7693 '1) Provide a full scale (8-112 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includesthe project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of colorphotographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of significant features from thesite. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): Southwest corner of Chuch and Terra Vista Parkway 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary):. 1077-422-97 '5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 12.1 '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed 12.1 dedications): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zonechange which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): None Updated 4/11/2013 Page 2 of 10 E9—E14Pg99 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovernmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Grading Permit, Encroachment Permit, Building Permit Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Water Quality Management Plan 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The site is currently vacant and was previously heavily disturbed and mass graded. The site contains a low stockpile of soil from when the adjacent retail center was constructed. The site undergoes quarterly land maintenance to manage weeds and rodents. Updated 4/1112013 Page 3 of 10 E9—E14Pg100 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): None, the site has been previously disturbed and mass graded 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: Adjacent roadway noise from Haven Avenue, Church St, Terra Vista Parkway, and Town Center Drive. See noise study. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: The proposed project contains 214 for -sale units on a 12.1 acre site. The product contains 81 detached bungalow units, and 133 attached townhome units on a condominium map. This results in a site density of 17.7 DU/AC. The project also includes multiple amenities in exceedance of Municipal Code requirements including a recreation center, pool, spa, tot lot, multiple bbq areas, pocket parks, etc. The project will construct the main backbone and perimeter improvement in Phase 1 with the models, while the remaining units will be built out in a phase approached. Grading is anticipated to start in late summer 2017. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): To the west of the site is Haven Avenue and an existing hard lined flood control channel. To the north is Church street and existing medium to low -medium density residential. To the east is existing office parks, and to the south is existing commercial centers. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 E9-E14Pg101 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No, the proposed project is consistent with the scale and character of the surrounding development 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on -site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Short-term noise will be due to construction, namely grading and earthwork. Long-term operational noise will be minor. See noise study for further information *16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: None 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: The site will convey storm water flows to an existing storm drain in Town Center Drive 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at (909) 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 54,784 Peak use (gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/min/ac) 4 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. r 0 Septic Tank 0 Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system Is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at (909) 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 40_66, b. Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac) Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 I N E9—E14Pg102 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: 214 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): Units are detached and attached but proposed on a condo map. 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $TBD to $ Rent (permonth) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: Bungalows: P1 = 2, Plan 2 = 4, Plan 3 = 3 Townhomes: P1 = 3, P2 = 3, P3 = 3, P4 = 4 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: size is 3. Per SCAG, Rancho Cucamonga's average household 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project., Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment 13: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: ' 4 c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and majorfunction(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: Updated 4/11/2013 Page 6 of io I E I E9—E14Pg103 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: i 27) Indicate hours of operation: i 28) Number of employees: Total: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipatediob classifications, Including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication ofthe rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): i k i 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City., •31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be i verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): t i 7 I J t ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine theirability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please Indicate their response. CVWD is the water and sewer purveyor for the site and have provided will -serve letters. Updated 4/1112013 Page 7 of 10 E9—E14Pg1O4 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardousand/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCBs; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and otherflammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, it known. No 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary orlong-term use,storage, or discharge of hazardous end/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Cleric of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and In the attached exhibits present the data and informationrequired for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: 3 cb V1 Signature: Title: \LsCa r--AN-f Cl -4p- Updated 4111/2013 Page 8 of 10 E9—E14Pg105 ATTACHMENT"A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single -Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi -Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows Single -Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi -Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 9 of 10 E9—E14Pg106 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5lh Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 0 Updated 4/11/2013 I I Page 10 of10 r t I i E9-E14Pg107 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Design Review DRC2016-00713, Variance DRC2017-00215, Minor Exception DRC2016-00716 and Minor Exception DRC2017-00159. 2. Related Files: Pre -Application DRC2016-00361 3. Description of Project: The project is for the development of 214 multi -family residential units (Design Review DRC2016-00713) on 12.1 acres on land at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway. The project includes a tentative tract map (SUBTT20054) for condominium purposes, which includes 33 numbered lots and 3 lettered lots. The project also includes a Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00715) to modify the development criteria for the Medium High (MH) District. Related files include a Minor Exception (DRC2016- 00716) to reduce the required on -site parking, a Minor Exception (DRC2017-00159) to increase property line wall heights due to on -site grades and a Variance (DRC2017-00215) for increased wall heights for sound attenuation purposes. 4. Project Sponsor Name and Address: LVD Terra Vista, LLC 1156 North Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91786 5. General Plan Designation: Medium High (MH) District 6. Zoning: Medium High (MH) District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site and the surrounding parcels to the north, south and west are all within the Terra Vista Community Plan area. The project site is within the Medium High (MH) District, which permits 14 to 24 dwelling units per acre. There is existing single-family residential development to the north within the Medium (M) District; to the south there is commercial development within the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District; to the east is an office development within the Office Park (OPK) District; and, to the west, across Haven Avenue, there is vacant land within the Mixed Use (MU) District that is under review for a senior care facility and a commercial/office development within the General Commercial (GC) District. A flood control facility (Deer Creek Channel) runs along the northwest corner of the project site. The site drains generally from north to south and is covered by non-native grasses. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tabe van der Zwaag (909) 477-2750, extension 4316 E9—E14Pg108 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 2 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) GLOSSARY — The following abbreviations are used in this report CALEEMOD — California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD — Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR — Environmental Impact Report FEIR — Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx — Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PMio — Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB — Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD — South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP — Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than -Significant -Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓) Aesthetics (✓) Biological Resources (✓) Greenhouse Gas Emissions () Land Use & Planning () Population & Housing (✓) Transportation/Traffic (✓) Agricultural Resources (✓) Cultural Resources () Hazards & Waste Materials () Mineral Resources () Public Services () Utilities & Service Systems (✓) Air Quality (✓) Geology & Soils (✓) Hydrology & Water Quality (✓) Noise () Recreation () Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (✓) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact' or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg109 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 3 () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon tKe proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: Date: 3 —7 %1 � Reviewed By: O.J mac' Date:34 Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg110 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant ith Mitigation Than Si;r,.anl No Impact Incor orates Im act Im act EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? () () () (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. Haven Avenue, which runs adjacent to the project site, is a special boulevard and a designated view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. The development of the project site will not negatively impact the Haven Avenue view corridor. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The site is located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway and is characterized by residential development to the north and by commercial and office development to the east, west and south. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of the project as the proposed multi -family development will become a larger part of the community. The project was reviewed by the City's Design Review Committee and is consistent with the Development Code and Terra Vista Community Plan design guidelines. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance.of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No.87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The plans on file include a photometric exhibit illustrating that the design and placement of light fixtures are in conformance with City standards including providing required shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg111 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 5 Less Than Significant Lass Issues and SupportingInftion So ormaurces: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incur grated Impact Im act 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (✓) Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re -zoning of, () () () (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest () () () (✓) land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway and is characterized by residential development to the north and by commercial and office development to the east, west and south. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg112 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Pace 6 Less Than nifiant Sigc Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant wth Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incur oreted Im act Im act non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway and is characterized by residential development to the north and by commercial and office development to the east, west and south. The nearest agricultural use is more than 2.5 miles to the northeast of the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project., a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (✓) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () (✓) () ( ) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (✓) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As discussed in subsection b, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health -based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMto), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PMto and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg113 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g PelenlianY Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act h..ro=Wd Impact Im act have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non -attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non -Attainment Status for Ozone, PM,o and PM2.e. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air. Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality Impact Analysis (date) was prepared by Landrum & Brown (March 16, 2017) that utilizes CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.1) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg114 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and SupportingInfation Sces: ormour Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act Short Term (Construction): Project Emissions and Impacts The project is for the development of a 214-unit multi -family project. The project site is currently vacant land. The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. Summary of Peak Construction Emissions (Emissions Summary of Overall Construction with Best Available Control Measures) Table 5 Total Construction Emissions Activity co Daily Emissions (lbs/day) NOx VOC PM10 PMx5 Sox Grading (2017) 18.2 34.8 3.1 8.0 4.9 0.0 Paving (2017) 15.2 20.7 2.0 1.2 1.1 0.0 Paving (2018) 14.9 17.5 1.7 1.0 0.9 0.0 Construction (201B) 20.4 27.4 3.3 1.6 1.4 010 Construction (2019) 19.7 25.0 2.9 1.4 1.2 Q.0 Architectural Coating (2018) 2.2 2.0 6.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 Architectural Coating (2019) 2.2, 1.9 6.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 Significance Threshold Exceed Threshold? SSG No 100 No 75 No 150 No 55 No 150 No Construction activities associated with the project will result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NOx, SOx, PMio and PM2.5 and are expected from the following construction activities: demolition, grading (including soil import), building construction, painting (architectural coatings) paving (curb, gutter, flatwork, and parking lot), and construction worker commuting. Rev 3-17 E9-E14Pg115 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorporated Im act Im act Localized Significance Summary (Construction Emissions with Best Available Control Measures) Table 7 On -Site Emissions By Construction Activi Activity Daily Emissions (Ibs/day) co NO. Mile PMaa Grading (2017) 18.0 34.8 8.0 4.9 Paving (2017) 15.0 20.7 1.2 1.1 Paving (2018) 14.8 17.5 1.0 0.9 Construction (2018) 17.6 23.4 1.5 1.4 Construction (2019) 17.2 21.1 1.3 1.2 Architectural Coating (2018) 1.9 2.0 0.2 0.2 Architectural Coating (2019) 1.8 1.8 0.1 0.1 Significance Threshold Exceed Threshold? 2193 No 270 No 16.0 No 9.0 No Table 8 On -Site Emissions By Concurrent Construction Activit Daily Emissions (Ibs/day) Activity c0 NOX PM10 PMz,s Grading, Paving (2017) 33.1 55.5 9.2 6.0 Paving, Construction, Architectural Coating (2018) 34.2 42.9 2.6 2.4 Construction, Architectural Coating (2019) 19.0 22.9 1.4 1.3 Significance Threshold 2193 270 16.0 9.0 Exceed Threshold? . No No No No Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on -site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions; however, as shown in the tables above, the amount will not exceed any threshold of significance. Rev 3-17 E9-E14Pg116 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Facie 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut -and -fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project -by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 55 Ibs of VOC per day (combined for all construction sources) during construction. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 Ibs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on -site and existing off -site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NCA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following Best Available Control Measures (BACM) identified in the Air Quality Impact Analysis by Landrum & Brown (March 16, 2017) as mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less -than -significant: 1) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg117 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information S PP g Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Inco orated Im act Im act least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts: Short -Term Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on -site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on -going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less -than -significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short-term air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg118 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. PP g Potentially Significant Wth Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. 10) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 11) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily'to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 12) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMto emissions. Project Long Term (Operational) Emissions and impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project -related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area; therefore, the proposed project would Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg119 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentiany Significant With Mitigation Than Signlficanl No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on -site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project. Summary of Peak Operational Emissions Table 9 Total operational Emissions Activity Co Daily Emissions (lbs/day) NOx VOC PMio 1711,I2.5 SOX Vehicular Emissions 20.0 12.0 2.0 3.9 1.1 0.1 Energy 0.4 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Architectural Coating 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Landscaping 17.7 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 Regional Significance Threshold 550 55 55 150 55 150 Localized 21193 270 -- 4 2 -- Significance Exceed Thresholds` No No No No No No Cumulative Impacts (Long Term/Operational Emissions) The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the potential impacts to air quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, continued development would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, all developments would be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a less -than -significant level. This City-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg120 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information S PP g Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 17) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 18) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR, which are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is within 1/4 mile of single-family residences. The localized significance thresholds (LSTs) were calculated based on an observer distance of 82 feet. LSTs are the maximum emissions at a project site that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent federal or state AAQS. LSTs are based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant within the project SRA and the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. SCQQMD's Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology states that the LST methodology applies to project -specific level project. Construction and operation activities associated 'with the proposed project would generate emissions. However, the emissions were shown not to exceed the significance thresholds and therefore would not cause a significant air quality impact on nearby sensitive receptor. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less -than -significant levels. 19) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg121 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 15 Lass Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information S PP g rmaSources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational odors (Long-term) are not typically associated with the type of use. Odors from the proposed multi -family residential development would most likely be from activities such as the cooking of food and the disposal of refuse, however, these odors would be minimal and not considered to be significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project., a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () (✓) () ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (✓) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with residential, commercial and office uses. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg122 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 16 Less Than .Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant wth Mitigation man Significant No Im W Inwr orates Impact Impact an area of sensitive biological resources. A Biological Resources Survey (Dudek; October 14, 2016) was conducted on the project site. Literature and field reconnaissance surveys were conducted to determine the likelihood of occurrence of any special -status plant or wildlife species. Two vegetation communities, disturbed habitat and ornamental planting, were mapped within the project survey area. A total of 5 plant species, 3 native and (or naturalized) plants (60%) and 2 non-native plants (40%). were recorded during the survey. No special -status plant species were identified within the site during the reconnaissance survey. A total of 1 mammal, 6 birds, 2 reptiles and 1 invertebrate species were observed. There is no USFWS designated critical habitat or listed wildlife species within the study area. The project site did contain burrows that were suitable for burrowing owl occupation, though no burrowing owls or signs of their presence was observed. No jurisdictional wetland or non -wetland waters were identified. Additionally, no riparian habitats were identified. The Biological Resources Survey concluded that the proposed development will not contribute to long-term cumulative impacts to biological resources. The Survey did recommend that a burrowing owl and nesting bird survey be conducted prior to any earth moving activities. With implementation of the following mitigation measures, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 2) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 3 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre -construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre - Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg123 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-0071.6 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Im act construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocolsand will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 3 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on -site, meaning the project will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on -site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence (SOI). The Biological Resources Survey (Dudek; October 14, 2016) states that the project site is not located within a wildlife movement corridor or habitat linkage area. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg124 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Inver oratetl Im act Im act 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) () () (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? e) Directly or indirectly affect a Native American tribal ( ) (✓) () ( ) cultural resource: Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). A Cultural Resources Survey (Dudek; October 7, 2017) was submitted for the project which included a records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) for a one -mile radius around the project site. Two records were found that included surveys of the project site and the surrounding land. Neither study identified any cultural resources within or adjacent to the project site. The records search also identified 23 additional studies within one-half mile of the project site. No previously recorded cultural resources were identified within the project area, however 9 resources were identified within a 1-mile radius. These historic -era resources included five residences, a winery, a ranch and a now vacant Pacific Electric Railway Corridor. Many of these resources have been demolished for new development. The nearest resources are a historic -era residence and winery building located approximately .5 miles from the project site. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) was contacted to request a search of the Sacred Lands File to determine the presence of cultural resources within 1 mile of the site. The NAHC responded that that their records showed no previously identified sacred land or areas of cultural importance with the project area. The Survey also included an intensive pedestrian survey which showed signs of previous earthmoving activities including discing/plowing, grading and the stockpiling of construction spoils. The previous earthmoving activities limited the amount of vegetation within the APE, which allowed excellent ground visibility. No artifacts or features were identified. The Survey concluded that there is a low potential for the inadvertent discovery of cultural resources during ground moving activities. Based on these observations, no cultural monitoring is recommended during future ground disturbing activities related to the current project. No impact on cultural resources is expected. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg125 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City.of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere -of - Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg126 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Pace 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially S ignifcant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act. Incorporated Impact Impact • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on -site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on -site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) In conformance with California State Bill (SB) 18, on December 18, 2016 staff sent a Tribal Consultation Request of the proposed project to a list of tribal communities provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. A letter dated December 16, 2016, was received by staff from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation requesting that a certified Native American Monitor be on site during any and all ground disturbances. Staff also sent out a Tribal Consultation request in conformance with California Assembly Bill (AB) 52 on February 22, 2017, of the proposed project to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, the San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. The City has not been contacted to date in regards to the (AB) 52 notification letter. With the following mitigation measure, impacts to the cultural resources will be less than significant. 3) A Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation certified Native American Monitor shall be onsite during any and all ground disturbances. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg127 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information S PP g Sources: Potentially Significant Wm Mitigation Than Than No Impact incorporated Impact Impact 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (✓) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including () () () (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (✓) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within .78 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3.5 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 12 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 16 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less -than -significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on -site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg128 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significantitig ith Mation T Significan ant No Impact Incor oratetl Impact Im act exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off - site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMfo emissions. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on -site consist of Tujunga loamy sand and Tujunga gravelly loamy sand/ Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on -site consist Tujunga loamy sand and Tujunga gravelly loamy sand/ Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. The Tujunga series are deep, excessively drained soils that formed in alluvium derived from granitic rock. They occur on alluvial fans and may include a thin layer of human -transported materials in urban areas. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg129 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pelee aily Significant Wm Mitigalicn Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or () (✓) () ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation () () (✓) ( ) adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Comments: a) Regulations and Significance — The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act (92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas (GHG) emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines 6 key GHGs (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)). The combined emissions of these well -mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in -State and out -of -State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg130 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUEITT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 24 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pp g Potenlialty Significant With Mitigation Than SignificantF No Impact Inhor cmted Impact Im act Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PMio, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PMto, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions. However, a screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is based upon South Coast Air Quality Management District staffs proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary sources emissions for non -industrial projects, as described in the SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Landrum & Brown; January 5, 2017), total project related emissions would be 2,507 MTCO2eq/year, as shown in the following table: Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg131 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 25 Less Than Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant Wth Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Table 4 Total Construction COz Emissions Activity CO2 Annual Emissions (MT/Year) CH4 Nz0 COzEQ Grading (2017) 539.3 0.2 0.0 543.4 Paving (2017) 387.5 0.1 0.0 390.5 Paving (2018) 381.4 0.1 0.0 384.4 Construction (2018) 543.0 0.1 0.0 546.0 Construction (2019) 536.9 0.1 0.0 539.9 Architectural Coating (2018) 51.4 0.0 0.0 51.5 Architectural Coatino 12019) 51.3 0.0 0.0 51.4 Total Emissions 0.7 0.0 2,507.2 Project Life Average Annual Construction Emissions* 83.0 0.02 0.0 83.6 Screening Threshold: 3,000 Exceed Threshold? No *Based on 30 Year Project We Per SCAQMD Significance Thresholds As shown in the table, direct and indirect operational emissions associated with the project as compared to the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance of 3,000 MTCO2e per year would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel -powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off -site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil - based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cho, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Landrum & Brown; January 5, 2017), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term construction impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: Rev 3-17 E9-E14Pg132 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wan Than Significant Miligaticn Significant No Impact Incur ora[etl Im act Impad 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Lonq Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off -site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project involves the construction of 214 multi -family residential units and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg133 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 27 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant wtn Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorhorated Impact Im act Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Landrum & Brown; January 5, 2017), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg134 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant Wlh Mitigation Than Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project involves the development of 214 multi -family residential units, which is consistent with the General Plan. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHGemission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re -use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the sustainability, and climate change policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant, unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Landrum & Brown; January 5, 2017), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term, construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to GHGs from short-term construction and long- term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (✓) acutely hazardous materials,, substances, or waste within 1l4 mile of an existing or proposed school? Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg135 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 29 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Inco .rated Impact Impact d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The nearest school, Ruth Musser Middle School (10789 Terra Vista Parkway), is located .17 miles from the project site. The project will be required to comply with existing State and Federal standards on the use and transport of hazardous materials. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg136 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 31 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Impact e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () (✓) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NO]) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off -site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg137 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 32 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potantiaiiy Significant Win Mitigation Than Significant No Impact incorporates Im act Im act an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP exhibit, prepared by Madole and Associates (August, 2016), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on -site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) 'During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg138 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Pace 33 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act Post -Construction Operational., 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticidesiherbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off -site. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg139 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 34 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Mitigatian Than Significant No Impact Inca crated Impact Im act e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off -site. No impacts are anticipated. Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a), less than significant impacts are anticipated. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management exhibit prepared by Madole and Associates (August, 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5.] No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete -lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non -significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg140 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorporated Im act Impact 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () ( ) () (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway and is characterized by residential development to the north and by commercial and office development to the east, west and south. This project will be of similar design and size to the multi -family development along Church Street to the east of the project site. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Medium High (MH) District The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The Medium High designation is characterized by condominium and apartment buildings with a density of 14 to 24 dwelling units per acre. The project is for the development of attached and detached multi -family residential units with a density of 17- 24 dwelling units per acre. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) () () (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments:, a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg141 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Paoe 36 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant wih Mitigation Than Sign cant No Impact Incorporated Im act Impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (✓) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) () () (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) () () (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) (') () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build out. A Noise Analysis (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017) was submitted for the project which reviewed both building exterior and interior noise levels as well as project construction noise levels. The study found that traffic noise levels will be the dominant noise source in the area. Traffic noise along the adjacent roadways (Haven Avenue, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Town Center Drive and Terra Vista Parkway) either approaches or exceeds 65 dB. The study determined that the exterior noise levels of the units facing Church Street, Terra Vista Parkway and Town Center Drive will not require noise remediation measures. The second floor decks are on the opposite side of the building from the adjacent roadways and will be screened by the roadways. The optional third floor decks on the row townhome buildings will require mitigation measures if they are located within the 65 dB contours of the roadways. Any deck located within 93 feet of the centerline of Church Street and having direct line of site to the roadway or within 190 feet of the centerline of Haven Avenue will require a noise barrier 5 feet in height around the perimeter of the deck. Rooftop decks on the buildings facing Terra Vista Parkway will not require noise mitigation as the buildings are located outside of the 65 dB noise contour. The project site will includes walls at least 6-feet high along Haven Avenue. The results of the analysis indicate that higher noise barriers will be required along Haven Avenue. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg142 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 37 Less Than Significant Lass and Supporting Information Sources: atanally Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues SinlFIm Na act Incorporated Impact Im acl These noise barriers will range in height from 7 to 8-1/2 feet in height (see Exhibit 3 of Noise Analysis by Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017 for exact height and location). Upper floor building surfaces in the project will be exposed to noise levels as high as 71.4 dBA, and therefore will require more than 26 dBA of outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction in order to meet the 45 dBA interior noise standard. With construction practices common in California, residential buildings achieve an outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction of at least 20 dB. Windows with ratings as high as STC 32 may be required in order to meet the interior noise standard of 45 dB. Windows will be required to be closed in order to meet the interior standard. Subsequently, mechanical ventilation will also be required within any units where the windows need to be closed. A final acoustical report will be required to review the construction plans to verify that the recommended upgrades will meet the outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction requirements for the project. The nearest sensitive land uses are the existing residences to the north of the project site. These residences are approximately 100 feet from the construction zone. Based on this distance, the unmitigated peak construction noise levels would be in the 74 to 89 dBA range for short periods of time. The average noise levels are typically 5 to 15 dB lower than peak noise levels. Average noise levels at the closest residential properties will be in the range of 64 to 79 dBA (approximately 10 dB lower than peak noise levels). These noise levels are above current noise levels experienced in the area, and therefore, significant increases may occur due to construction noise. The resultant noise levels are higher than existing ambient conditions, but are not excessively high. This level of noise is common in many urban areas. Limiting construction noise to those hours consistent with the City's Noise Ordinance will be necessary and is required as well as providing temporary noise barriers for construction activities closet to residences. With the following mitigation measures, interior, exterior and construction related noise impacts will be less than significant: Exterior.' 1) Any deck located within 93 feet of the centerline of Church Street and having direct line of site to the roadway or within 190 feet of the centerline of Haven Avenue shall provide a noise barrier 5 feet in height around the perimeter of the deck. 2) Solid block walls shall be provided along Haven Avenue and a portion of the south property line that range in height from 7 to 8-1/2 feet in height (see the Exhibit 3 in the acoustic report submitted for the project (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017 for the height and location of these walls). 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 4) Provide temporary noise barriers for all construction activities that take place in close proximity to the adjacent residences. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg143 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713 ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Pace 38 Less Than Significant Les, Issues and Supporting Information S PP g mSources: Potentially Significant wth Mitigation Than Significant' No Impact Incorporated Im acl Im act Interior: 5) A final acoustical report shall be submitted prior to approval of building permits to review the construction plans to verify the incorporation of the sound reduction measures outlined in the acoustic study (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017) and any additional mitigation measures deemed necessary to bring the project interior noise levels into conformance with the City's indoor noise standards. 6) Submit a letter from an acoustic engineer verifying that the recommended noise mitigation measures were incorporated prior to final Planning Department approval of any building within the project. b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. With the exterior mitigation measures outlined above, the construction related vibration will be less than significant. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on -site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 7) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 8) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 9) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on -site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg144 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 39 Lass Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant Na Impact IncorEorated Impact Impact 10) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will include the construction of 214 multiple -family units. Although the project will increase the population growth in the area there will be a less than significant impact as the project is consistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation.The density was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. No significant impacts are anticipated. b) Because the property is vacant, there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. c) Because the property is vacant, there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg145 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 40 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information So PP g maSources: Potentially Significant wth Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () (✓) b) Police protection? () () () (✓) c) Schools? () () () (✓) d) Parks? () () () (✓) e) Other public facilities? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The site, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway, would be served by Rancho Cucamonga Fire Station #12 (9612 San Bernardino Road) located approximately 1.25 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) The increase in residential units may lead to an increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Spruce Avenue Park (7730 Spruce Avenue), is located .25 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg146 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 41 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporaletl Impact Im act library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the closest public library, the Paul A. Biane Library, recently completed a second floor addition that added 13,500 square feet of specialized programming space. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project. a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or () () () (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Spruce Avenue Park (7730 Spruce Avenue), is located .25 miles from the project site. The project is for the development of 214 multi -family housing units. The project site is zoned Medium High (MH) District, which is a residential zoning district. The General Plan contemplated the development of residential units at the proposed density on the project site. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above 16. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy () (✓) () ( ) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management () () () (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg147 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 42 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act hn act d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) A Trip Impact Evaluation (Trames Solutions, Inc.; January 23, 2017) was submitted for the project. The trip generation rates used for the evaluation were based on information collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), as provided by their Trip Generation manual (91h Edition, 2012). The ITE Residential Condo/Town House (133 units) and Single -Family Detached (81 units) land use categories were utilized to determine trip generation rates and peak hour trip generation. The proposed project is anticipated to generate a net total of approximately 1,544 based trip -ends per day with 118 AM peak hour trips and 151 PM peak hour trips. The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not maintain their own traffic study guidelines and instead defer to the County of San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) traffic study guidelines. The County of San Bernardino CMP requires a traffic study be prepared if a project generates 250 two-way peak hour trips and that expects to add at least 50 peak our trips to a key intersection. Based on the analysis conducted for the proposed project, no study area intersections were determined to have a direct significant impact due to the proposed project. However, a cumulative impact is anticipated at the intersection of Terra Vista Parkway/Town Center Drive under Existing Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (EACP) 2019 conditions. The deficient intersection of Terra Vista Parkway/Town Center Drive is not anticipated to meet traffic signal warrants. Converting the two-way stop control to an all -way stop control at the deficient intersection is anticipated to mitigate the level of service to acceptable conditions (LOD "D" or better). The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. With the following mitigation measures, the traffic impact will be less than significant. 1) Provide an all -way stop control at the Terra Vista[Town Center Drive intersection. 2) Provide stop sign control at the project driveways. 3) On -site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. 4) Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg148 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 43 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than SignificantF No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act b) The County of San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) estimates that each Residential Condo/Townhouse units will generate 5.81 two-way peak hour trips daily and the Single Family Detached units will generate 9.52 two-way peak hour trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The design of the project includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction including providing bicycle storage areas and being in close proximity to a transit stop. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg149 Initial Study for: City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 44 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Ss: PP g ormaSources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Signi&ant No Impact Inca orated Impact Im act e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland. The current daily water usage in the CVWD service area is approximately 41.7 million gallons per day (mgd). Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed. Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent. Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for projects that exceed the following sizes: 1) residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet; 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet; 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms; 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet; 6) mixed use project including one or more of the projects specified above; 7) any other project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or greater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit project; and 8) any Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg150 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 45 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pP 9 Potentially Slgnificam With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system. Under SB 221, a Water Supply Assessment is required when: 1) A project that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) a project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system; and 3) applies to development agreements that Include such subdivision. The City has determined that the proposed project does not meet one of the requirements; therefore, a Water Supply Assessment is not required. As discussed, the project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and ,regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AS 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg151 Initial Study for: TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 City of Rancho Cucamonga VAR DRC2017-00215, Page 46 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant wm Mitigation Tnan Signifcant No Im act Inmr crated Im ad Im atl Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. A Biological Resources Survey (Dudek; October 14, 2016) was conducted on the project site. There is no USFWS designated critical habitat or listed wildlife species within the project area. The project site did contain burrows that were suitable for burrowing owl occupation, though no burrowing owls or signs of their presence was observed. No jurisdictional wetland or non -wetland waters were identified. Additionally, no riparian habitats were identified. The Biological Resources Survey concluded that the proposed development will not contribute to long-term cumulative impacts to biological resources. The Survey did recommend that a burrowing owl and nesting bird survey be conducted prior to any earth moving activities. With implementation of the mitigation measures outlined in Section 4 (Biological Resources), no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build -out in the City and Sphere -of -Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed -use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction -related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less -than -significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg152 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 47 were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Terra Vista Planned Community EIR (SCH #81082808, certified February 16, 1983) Technical Appendences (A) Air Quality Assessment (Landrum & Brown; January 5, 2017) (B) Biological Resources Letter (Dudek; October 14, 2016) (C) Cultural Resources Letter (Dudek, October7, 2016) (D) Greenhouse Gas Assessment (Landrum & Brown; January 5„ 2017) (E) Noise Analysis (Landrum & Brown; March 1, 2017) (F) Traffic Impact Analysis (Trames Solutions; January 23, 2017) Rev 3-17 E9—E14Pg153 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TVCPA DRC2016-00715, SUBTT20054, DR DRC2016-00713, VAR DRC2017-00215, ME DRC2016-00716 AND ME DRC2017-00159 Page 46 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: � Date: 115 RAf> 10 Print Name and Title: Rev 3-17 C�-% E9—E14Pg154 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2016-00713/SUBTT20054 Applicant: LVD Terra Vista, LLC Initial Study Prepared by: Tabe van der Zwaag Date: March 27, 2017 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non -Compliance 1) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, PD/BO C Review of Plans C 2 the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low -emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. Page 1 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non -Compliance 6) The construction contractor shall utilize BO C Review of Plans A/C 4 electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low pressure spray 10) All construction equipment shall comply with BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 roads. • Phase grading to prevent the BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule BO C During Construction A 4 established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of Page 2 of 15 m A V V Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non -Compliance year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high BO C During Construction A 4 winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard BO C During Construction A 4 ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. - 11) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During Construction A 4 soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 12) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by BO C During Construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and BO C During Construction A 4 reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought- BO C During Construction A 4 resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road BO C During Construction A 4 materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous BO C During Construction A 4 Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 17) All residential and commercial structures shall BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low- polluting heating. air conditioning, appliances, Page 3 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance and water heaters. 18) All residential and commercial structures shall BO CID Review of Plans C 2/4 be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 19) All new development in the City of Rancho BO CID Review of Plans C 214 Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions Of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Sect�oni4 BiologicahResources; p, 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation PD C Review of Report AID 3/4 or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Page 4 of 15 m Lo i _m A -o S W Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date/initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 2) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in pD C Review of Report A/D 3/4 conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 3 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: • Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre - construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre - construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre - construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 3 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. Page 5 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non -Compliance • During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. • During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. > .✓ 1.� � »mot.. ,� 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect PD/BO C Review of Report AID 3/4 undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Page 6 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non -Compliance • Consider establishing provisions to PD/BO C Review of Report A/D 3/4 require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of Report A/D 314 archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with PD B/C Review of report A/D 2/4 Section 21083.2 Archeological and plans during resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse construction project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources PD C Review of Report A/D 3/4 management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or PD B Review of Report A/D 4 animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Page 7 of 15 m i _m LO -o rn N Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained PD B Review of Report A/D 4 and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area BO B/C Review of Report A/D 4 being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. if construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all PD D Review of Report D 3 recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of PD D Review of Report D 3 Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. 3) A Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh PD B Review of Report A/D 4 Nation certified Native American Monitor shall be onsite during any and all ground disturbances. Section:6�GeologyandSoils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During Construction A 4 soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re- planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept BO C During Construction A 4 according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Page 8 of 15 m to I _m A a Lo rn w Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when BO C During Construction A 4 wind speeds. exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by BO C During Construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce Mo emissions. Sectl66AW" Greenhouse g 9 missions `° 4.} Short Term (Construction)�GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that BO C During Construction A 4 assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select BO, C During Construction A 4 construction equipment based on low - emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more BO C During Construction A 4 than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be BO C During Construction A 4 utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to BO C During Construction A 4 interfere withpeak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be BO C During Construction A 4 supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 7) Construction and Building materials shall be BO A During Construction C 2 produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials Page 9 of 15 m i _m A v �n M a Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non -Compliance that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California BO C During Construction A 4 Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation BO A During Construction C 2 strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, Page 10 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and CE A Review of Plans C 2 demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Sectionig Hydrology and_ 1NaterQuality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 permit applicant shall 'submit to Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, BO B/C/D/ Review of Plans A/C 214 included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off - site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. Page 11 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance 3) During construction, temporary berms such BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of .grading or paving BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate Page 12 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Madole and Associates (August, 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Section'12 Noise - Exterior 1) Any deck located within 93 feet of the PD/BO B Review of Plans C/A 4 centerline of Church Street and having direct line of site to the roadway or within 190 feet of the centerline of Haven Avenue shall provide a noise barrier 5 feet in height around the perimeter of the deck. 2) Solid block walls shall be provided along PD/BO B Review of Plans C/A 4 Haven Avenue and a portion of the south property line that range in height from 7 to 8- 1/2 feet in height (see the Exhibit 3 in the acoustic report submitted for the project (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017 for the height and location of these walls). 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a PD/BO B Review of Plans C/A 4 construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 4) Provide temporary noise barriers for all PD/BO B/C Review of Plans C 4 construction activities that take place in close proximity to the adjacent residences. Page 13 of 15 m A -o rn 00 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance Interior 5) A final acoustical report shall be submitted PD B C C 2 prior to approval of building permits to review the construction plans to verify the incorporation of the sound reduction measures outlined in the acoustic study (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017) and any additional mitigation measures deemed necessary to bring the project interior noise levels into conformance with the City's indoor noise standards. 6) Submit a letter from an acoustic engineer PD B C C 2 verifying that the recommended noise mitigation measures were incorporated prior to final Planning Department approval of any building within the project. 7) Construction or grading shall not take place BO C During Construction A 4 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 8) Construction or grading noise levels shall not BO C During Construction A 4 exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 9) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed PD C I During Construction A 2 Page 14 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non -Compliance as early as possible in the first phase. 10) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place PO/BO C During Construction A 4/7 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Sectldn:l5 ,TransportatldnlSraffic '• : - - ". - _ __ - - - - - - 1) Provide an all -way stop control at the Terra BO B Prior to Construction C 3 Vista/Town Center Drive intersection. 2) Provide stop sign control at the project BO B Prior to Construction C 3 driveways. 3) On -site traffic signing and striping should be BO B Prior to Construction C 3 implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. 4) Verify that minimum sight distance is gp B Prior to Construction C 3 provided at the project driveways. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible,Petson, y ,.- ",Momtor�ng4Frequen'cy Methotl,of,-Venflcafion Sanctions CDD - Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development A - On -site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD - Planning Director or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Citation Page 15 of 15 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, Design Review DRC2016-00713, Variance DRC2017-00215, Minor Exception DRC2016-00716 and Minor Exception DRC2017-00159. Public Review Period Closes: May 10, 2017 Project Name: LVD Terra Vista, LLC Project Applicant: Adam Collier LVD Terra Vista, LLC 1156 North Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91786 Project Location (also see attached map): Southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway — APN: 1077-422-97. Project Description: The project is for the development of 214 multi -family residential units (Design Review DRC2016-00713) on 12.1 acres on land at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway. The project includes a tentative tract map (SUBTT20054) for condominium purposes, which includes 33 numbered lots and 3 lettered lots. The project also includes a Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00715) to modify the development criteria for the Medium High (MH) District. The project applications include a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00716) to reduce the required on -site parking, a Minor Exception (DRC2017-00159) to increase property line wall heights due to on -site grade differences and a Variance (DRC2017-00215) for increased wall heights for sound attenuation purposes. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon.the following finding: The Initial Study indicates that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909)477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. Date of Determination Adopted By E9—E14Pg170 RESOLUTION NO. 17-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMDENDMENT DRC2016-00715 - A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WITHIN THE MEDIUM HIGH (MH) DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN RELATED TO THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 214- UNIT MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON 12.1 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE MEDIUM HIGH (MH) DISTRICT (14 - 24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1089- 031-36. A. Recitals. 1. LVD Terra Vista, LLC filed an application for the approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of May 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway in the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan; and b. There is existing attached and detached residential development to the north within the Medium (M) District; to the south is commercial development within the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District; to the east is an office development within the Office Park (OPK) District; and to the west, across Haven Avenue, is vacant land within the Mixed Use (MU) District that is approved for a senior care facility and an existing commercial/office development within the General Commercial (GC) District. A flood control facility (Deer Creek Channel) runs along the northwest corner of the project site; and C. The project is for the development of a 214-unit, multi -family residential project (Design Review DRC2016-00713) on 12.1 acres on land; and E9—E14Pg171 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-34 TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00715 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 2 d. The project includes a Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00715) to modify the development criteria for the Medium High (MH) District, a Minor Exception to reduce the required on -site parking (DRC2016-00716) and a Variance (DRC2017-00215) and Minor Exception (DRC2016-00159) for wall heights; and e. Terra Vista Community Plan amendment DRC2016-00715 will amend the development criteria for the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan to provide larger projects with greater flexibility in order encourage unique layouts and a mix of housing types. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This Terra Vista Community Plan Text Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. The proposed Amendment will modify the development criteria for new projects with greater than 200 units in the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Visa Community Plan area. It will permit greater plan flexibility to allow for creative site planning and for a mix of housing types while staying true to the intent of the Medium High (MH) District, which is for the development of multi -family developments with a density range of 14 to 24 units per acre. b. This Terra Vista Community Plan Text Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code. The Amendment will permit high quality development within the Medium High (MH) District, while providing larger projects with the flexibility necessary to provide for a wider mix of housing types and for unique site planning. c. The proposed Terra Vista Community Plan Text Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, The amendment will modify the development criteria of the Medium High (MH) District to allow building and wall setback, building separations and the size of private open space areas to be determined through the development review process. The development review process will ensure that the resulting projects will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. d. The proposed Terra Vista Community Plan Text Amendment is consistent with the objectives the Development Code. The Amendment will allow greater plan flexibility when developing large multi -family developments in the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Plan area. e. The proposed Terra Vista Community Plan Text Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The Amendment will permit a wider variety of housing types to be constructed in the Medium High (MH) District, while maintaining the intent of the district which is for the development of multi -family projects with a density of 14 to 24 dwelling units per acre. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: E9—E14Pg172 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-34 TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00715 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 3 a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to approving the requested Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment application as shown in Attachment "A" subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) Approval is for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715, to modify the development criteria for the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan related to the site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit multi -family development located at the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway. —APN: 1077-422-97. 2) Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715 requires final approval by the City Council along with adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. 3) Approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715 is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Design Review DRC2016-00713 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054. E9—E14Pg173 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-34 TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00715 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 4 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: E9—E14Pg174 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-34 TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00715 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 5 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E9—E14Pg175 > The above site development standards apply to the building site, which is the cluster development as a whole or a designated portion of it. They govern the relationship of the > cluster development to adjoining property and to adjoining = streets and open spaces. Within the cluster development, the relationship of buildings to one another, to property m lines, and to other features, such as open spaces and private Z streets, is governed by the provisions of the Uniform Building Code. The above trail setbacks, however, are applicable within the development if a master -planned trail occurs interior to the site. Medium High Density Residential Land designated as Medium High Density Residential is intended for residential development that ranges from 14 to 24 dwellings per gross acre. The following regulations apply. Uses permitted: (a) Multifamily dwellings, including, but not limited to, apartment projects, condominium projects, and cooperative apartment projects. (b) Single family attached dwellings. (c) Community facilities as specified below. (d) Accessory uses as specified above. a Site development standards: (a) Building site area: 1 acre minimum. EXISTING (b) Building setbacks: As indicated in Table V-4. (c) Garage, carport, and accessory building setbacks: As indicated in Table V-4. (d) Setbacks for uncovered parking: As indicated in Table V-4. (e) Building site width and depth: As permitted by required setbacks. (f) Building site coverage: No maximum subject to Development Review Process. (g) Building height: 45 feet maximum. (h) Building separations: The standards from the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code shall apply. The above site development standards apply to the building site, which is the development as a whole or a designated portion of it. They govern the relationship of the development to adjoining property and to adjoining streets and open spaces. Within the development, the above standards govern building separation and setbacks from master -planned trails. Otherwise, within the development, the relationship of buildings to one another, to property lines, and to other features, such as open spaces and private streets, is governed by the provisions of the Uniform Building Code. (High Density Residential development standards discussed on page V-18). REVISED Amendment No. 6, Mald-Family Amendment V-15 (b)Building setbacks: As indicated in Table V-4. (c)Garage, carport, and accessory building setbacks: As indicated in Table V-4. (d)Setbacks for uncovered parking: As indicated in Table V-4. (e)Building site width and depth: As permitted by required setbacks. (f)Building site coverage: No maximum subject to Development Review Process. (g)Building height: 45 feet maximum m m(h)Building separations: The standards from the Rancho 4; Cucamonga Development Code shall apply. V (i) The following development standards are required for new developments with greater than 200 units*: • Street Setback - Up to 75% reduction of streetscape requirements • Building Separations - Up to 75% reduction from the related building separation requirements • Wall Setbacks - Up to 75% reduction from the related wall setback requirements • Private Open Space - Up to 35% reduction from the related private open space requirements. Recreational amenities shall be enhanced to provide additional features and service to residents offset the loss of private open space. *Subject to review and approval by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission per Section 17.20.040 (Design Review) of the Development Code. The above site development standards apply to the building site, which is the development as a whole or a designated portion of it. They govern the relationship of the development to adjoining property and to adjoining streets and open spaces. Within the development, the above standards govern building separation and setbacks from master -planned trails. Otherwise, within the development, the relationship of buildings to one another, to property lines, and to other features, such as open spaces and private streets, is governed by the provisions of the Uniform Building Code. (High Density Residential development standards discussed on page V-18). REVISED Amendment No. 6, Multi -Family Amendment V-15 PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 17-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20054 - A REQUEST SUBDIVIDE 12.1 ACRES OF LAND FOR AIRSPACE PURPOSES FOR 214 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS RELATED TO THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 214- UNIT, MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE MEDIUM HIGH (MH) DISTRICT (14 - 24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREETAND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1089-031-36. A. Recitals. 1. LVD Terra Vista, LLC filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 1 Oth day of May 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway in the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan; and b. There is existing attached and detached residential development to the north within the Medium (M) District; to the south is commercial development within the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District; to the east is an office development within the Office Park (OPK) District; and to the west, across Haven Avenue, is vacant land within the Mixed Use (MU) District that is approved for a senior care facility and an existing commercial/office development within the General Commercial (GC) District. A flood control facility (Deer Creek Channel) runs along the northwest corner of the project site; and C. The project is for the development of a 214-unit, multi -family residential project (Design Review DRC2016-00713) on 12.1 acres on land; and d. The project includes a tentative tract map (SUBTT20054) for condominium purposes, which includes 33 numbered lots and 3 lettered lots; and E9—E14Pg178 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-35 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20054 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 2 e. The project includes a Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00715) to modify the development criteria for the Medium High (MH) District, a Minor Exception to reduce the required on -site parking (DRC2016-00716) and a Variance (DRC2017-00215) and Minor Exception (DRC2016-00159) for wall heights. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The tentative tract map is for the subdivision of 12.1 acres of land for airspace purposes for 214 residential condominium units and is consistent with the intent of the Medium High (MH) residential designation, which is characterized by condominiums and apartment buildings with a density of 14 to 24 dwelling units per acre. The project is for the development of a multi -family, for sale residential project with a density of 17.7 dwelling units per acre. b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The project site is within the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan. The intent for the Medium High (MH) District is for the development of multi -family dwellings with a range of 14 to 24 dwelling units per acre. The project is for the development of a multi -family, for sale residential project with a density of 17.7 dwelling units per acre. C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project site is well suited for the proposed 214-unit multi -family development, which includes vehicle access from 3 public streets and is in an area developed with attached and detached residential development. d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. An environmental review was completed for the project which concluded that with the proposed mitigation measures, the project would have a less than significant impact on the environment. e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project site is being subdivided for residential purposes and will not include the use of hazardous materials that would cause public health issues. f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The subject property does not contain any easements that would limit access to or use of the project site. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the E9—E14Pg179 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-35 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20054 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 3 project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the Tentative Tract Map application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054 for the subdivision of 12.1 acres of land for airspace purposes for 214 residential condominium units, which includes 33 numbered lots and 3 lettered lots for a site located at the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway. APN: 1077-422-97. 2) Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054 is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Design Review DRC2016-00713 and City Council approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715 and adoption of the related Mitigated Negative Declaration. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. E9—E14Pg180 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-35 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20054 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 4 4) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A 17-0 Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E9—E14Pg181 ft [jnncrto VCAMONGA Project #: Conditions of Approval Community Development Department SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: LewisNan Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. A certified Native American monitor acceptable to Kizh Nation and the San Manuel Band of Mission disturbances. 2. Exterior Noise: both the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Indians be on site during any and all ground 1) Any deck located within 93 feet of the centerline of Church Street and having direct line of site to the roadway or within 190 feet of the centerline of Haven Avenue shall provide a noise barrier 5 feet in height around the perimeter of the deck. 2) Solid block walls shall be provided along Haven Avenue and a portion of the south property line that range in height from 7 to 8-1/2 feet in height (see the Exhibit 3 in the acoustic report submitted for the project (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017 for the height and location of these walls). 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 4) Provide temporary noise barriers for all construction activities that take place in close proximity to the adjacent residences. Interior Noise: 5) A final acoustical report shall be submitted prior to approval of building permits to review the construction plans to verify the incorporation of the sound reduction measures outlined in the acoustic study (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017) and any additional mitigation measures deemed necessary to bring the project interior noise levels into conformance with the City's indoor noise standards. 6) Submit a letter from an acoustic engineer verifying that the recommended noise mitigation measures were incorporated prior to final Planning Department approval of any building within the project. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/13/2017 E9—E14Pg182 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. Traffic: 1) Provide an all -way stop control at the Terra Vista/Town Center Drive intersection. 2) Provide stop sign control at the project driveways. 3) On -site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. 4) Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 5. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 6. Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 7. Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 8. Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 9. Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection ,and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 10. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Printed:.4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us E9—E14Pg183 Page 2 of 19 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11.If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing plrovisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 12.If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 19 E9—E14Pg184 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017- 0215 Project Name: Lewis/Van baele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 14. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 15. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the rite during such episodes. 16. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 17. The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 18. The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 19. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 20. Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 21. Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 22. Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. 23. Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials' such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 24. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; Increased insulation. Limit air leakage through the structure. Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. w .CityofRC.us Printed: 4/13/2017 Page 4 of 19 E9—E14Pg185 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 ProjectName: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 25. Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets dnd waterless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 26. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 27. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 28. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b ) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 29. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff: Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 19 E9—E14Pg186 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: LewisNan Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City iflsilt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24 inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 31. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 32. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 33. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. 34. Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. www:cityofRC.us Printed; 4/13/2017 page 6 of 19 E9—E14Pg187 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 35. Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre- construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre - construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non- migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre - construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 36. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Printed: 4n www.CityofRC.us 3/2017 Page 7 of 19 E9—E14Pg188 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: LewisNan Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planninq Department Standard Conditions of Approval 37. During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 38. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 39. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 40. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 41. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Madole & Associates, February 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 42. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 43. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 44. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 45. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 46. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. Printed: 4/1312017 www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 19 E9—E14Pg189 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 47. All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 48. The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 49. The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 50. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 51. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 52. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 53. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 54. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 55. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Haven Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Remove existing drive approach and replace with curb and gutter and sidewalk. C. No driveways to Haven Avenue. D. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. "Major Divided Arterial" �Whv.CltyofriC.uS Printed: 4A 3/2017 Page 9 of 19 E9—E14Pg190 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 . Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. Church Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Secondary with Median" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb and gutter as required. B. Provide sidewalk as required. C. Proposed driveway shall align with existing street on the opposite side and be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. D. Provide adequate sight distance for proposed driveway on Church Street, which may include removal of street trees within the median upon approval of the City Public Works Department. E. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 3. Terra Vista Parkway West frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Proposed driveway shall align with existing driveway on the opposite side a C. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 4. Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, along with three 1 '/<" innerducts in one of the 4" conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber -to -the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 5. Development impact fees will be collected at the building permits. This development is not subject to the drainage nor park impact fee. Note: fees are subject to change annually. 6. The existing ramps located at the southeast corner of Church and Haven, the southwest corner Church and Terra Vista, and the north west corner of Town Center and Terra Vista shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If the ramps do not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramps for compliance. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit or approval of final subdivision map whichever occurs first. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 7. The northwest portion between the existing channel and Haven Avenue is currently publically maintained. Update the existing maintenance area to meet the low maintenance requirements. "Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40 percent) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non -irrigated surfaces." In -lieu of updating the current LMD area, the City may quitclaim the existing LMD area and dedicate to the HOA for maintenance. Standard Conditions of Approval www.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/13/2017 page 10 of 79 E9—E14Pg191 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: Project Type: -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. Town Center Drive frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 9. This property has already joined the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts. 10. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Lines C7, C1, and C4 shall conform to City Standard 100-B. 11. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Church St: Side -walk Drive Appr. Street Trees Terra Vista: Street Trees Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 12. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed: 4/13/2017 w .CltyofRC.us Page 11 of 19 E9—E141pg192 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per ADA Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Drainage facilities on -site shall be privately maintained and transition to a public storm drain at the right-of-way on Town Center Drive. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/13/2017 Page 12 or 19 E9—E14Pg193 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 16. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 17. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 18. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Printed: 4/13/2017 wvnv.CilyofRC.us Page 13 0! 19 E9—E14Pg194 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: Project Type: -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. 20. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 21. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 22. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 23. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Building and Fire Standard Conditions of Approval When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as required by the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us E9—E14Pg195 Page 14 of 19 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the 'Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 3. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 4. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 5. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 6. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 8. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 9. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. Printed: 4/13/2017 wewv.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 19 E9—E14Pg196 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 15. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; III) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 16. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Terra Vista Parkway) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 17. Prior to issuance 'of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 18. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 19, Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. Printed: 4/1312017 Hvrvv.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 19 E9—E14Pg197 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Location: Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 21. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 22. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 23. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 24. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 25. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi -family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within multi -family developments shall include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the private street/drive aisle centerline. 26. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 27. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 28. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the ,proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 29. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 30. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 31. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. Printed: 4/13/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 17 ol19 E9—E14Pg198 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: LewisNan Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 33. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 34. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 35. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 36. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 37. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 38. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 4113/2017 wmr.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 19 E9—E14Pg199 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: LewisNan Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 39. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 5/2/2017 www.CltyofRC.us Page 19 of 19 E9—E14Pg200 Project #: Project Name: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Grading Section Standard conditions of Approval 39. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. w ,GityofRC.us Page 19 of 19 Printed: 5/2/2017 E9—E14Pg201 RESOLUTION NO. 17-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00713 - A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 214-UNIT, MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON 12.1 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE MEDIUM HIGH (MH) DISTRICT (14 - 24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1089- 031-36. A. Recitals. 1. LVD Terra Vista, LLC filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2016- 00713, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of May 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 1. ;V ITITeTi NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway in the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan; and b. There is existing attached and detached residential development to the north within the Medium (M) District; to the south is commercial development within the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District; to the east is an office development within the Office Park (OPK) District; and to the west, across Haven Avenue, is vacant land within the Mixed Use (MU) District that is approved for a senior care facility and an existing commercial/office development within the General Commercial (GC) District. A flood control facility (Deer Creek Channel) runs along the northwest corner of the project site; and C. The project is for the development of a 214-unit, multi -family residential project (Design Review DRC2016-00713) on 12.1 acres on land; and d. The project includes a tentative tract map (SUBTT20054) for condominium purposes, which includes 33 numbered lots and 3 lettered lots; and E9—E14Pg202 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-36 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00713 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 2 e. The project includes a Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00715) to modify the development criteria for the Medium High (MH) District, a Minor Exception to reduce the required on -site parking (DRC2016-00716) and a Variance (DRC2017-00215) and Minor Exception (DRC2016-00159) for wall heights. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistentwith the General Plan. The General Plan Land Use designation of the project site is Medium High (MH) District. The Medium High residential designation is characterized by condominiums and apartment buildings with a density of 14 to 24 dwelling units per acre. The project is for the development of a multi -family, for sale residential project with a density of 17.7 dwelling units per acre. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is within the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan. The intent for the Medium High (MH) District is for the development of multi -family dwellings with a range of 14 to 24 dwelling units per acre. C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project includes a Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment (DRC2016- 00715) to create flexibility in the wall and building setbacks, building separations and private open space requirements for new projects with over 200 dwelling units. The project also includes, a Minor Exception to reduce the required on -site parking (DRC2016-00716) and a Variance (DRC2017-00215) and Minor Exception (DRC2016-00159) for wall heights. With approval of the Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment and the exceptions for parking and wall heights, the project will be compliantwith the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. An environmental review was completed for the project which concluded that with the proposed mitigation measures, the project would have a less than significant impact on the environment. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment forthe application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. E9—E14Pg203 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-36 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00713 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 3 b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the Design Review application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for Design Review DRC2016-00713, for the site plan and architectural review of a 214-unit, multi -family development located at the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway.—APN:1077- 422-97. 2) Approval for Design Review DRC2016-00713 is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054 and City Council approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00715 and adoption of the related Mitigated Negative Declaration. 3) Add additional pilasters around the pool area to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a E9—E14Pg204 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-36 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00713 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 4 result of such action. The City at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA go ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E9—E14Pg205 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. A certified Native American monitor acceptable to Kizh Nation and the San Manuel Band of Mission disturbances. 2. Exterior Noise: both the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Indians be on site during any and all ground 1) Any deck located within 93 feet of the centerline of Church Street and having direct line of site to the roadway or within 190 feet of the centerline of Haven Avenue shall provide a noise barrier 5 feet in height around the perimeter of the deck. 2) Solid block walls shall be provided along Haven Avenue and a portion of the south property line that range in height from 7 to 8-1/2 feet in height (see the Exhibit 3 in the acoustic report submitted for the project (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017 for the height and location of these walls). 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 4) Provide temporary noise barriers for all construction activities that take place in close proximity to the adjacent residences. Interior Noise: 5) A final acoustical report shall be submitted prior to approval of building permits to review the construction plans to verify the incorporation of the sound reduction measures outlined in the acoustic study (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017) and any additional mitigation measures deemed necessary to bring the project interior noise levels into conformance with the City's indoor noise standards. 6) Submit a letter from an acoustic engineer verifying that the recommended noise mitigation measures were incorporated prior to final Planning Department approval of any building within the project. Pnnted 4/13/2017 viww.CityofRC.us E9-E14Pg206 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please he advised of the following Special Conditions 3. Traffic: 1) Provide an all -way stop control at the Terra Vista/Town Center Drive intersection. 2) Provide stop sign control at the project driveways. 3) On -site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. 4) Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 5. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 6. Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 7. Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 8. Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 9. Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 10. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Printed:4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 19 E9—E14Pg207 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC?r017-00215 Project Name: Location: Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11.If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 12.If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.cltyofRC.us E9—E14Pg208 Page 3 of 19 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713 DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 14. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 15. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 16. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 17. The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 18. The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 19. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 20. Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 21. Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 22. Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. 23. Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 24. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; Increased insulation. Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. vnvw.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/13/2077 Page 4 of 19 E9—E14Pg209 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 I Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 25. Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual (flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 26. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 27. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 28. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 29. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CltyofRC,us Page 5 of 19 E9—E14Pg210 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24 inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 31. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 32. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 33. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. 34. Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird 'Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Printed: 4/1312017 w .CltyofRC.us Page 6 of 18 E9—E14Pg211 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 35. Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre- construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre - construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non- migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre - construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 36. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Printed: 4/13/2017 wvwv.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 19 E9—E14Pg212 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 37. During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 38. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 39. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 40. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 41. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Madole & Associates, February 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 42. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 43. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 44. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 45. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 46. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CltyofRC.us Page B of 19 E9—E14Pg213 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 47. All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 48. The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 49. The contractor, shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 50. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 51. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 52. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 53. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 54. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 55. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Haven Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Remove existing drive approach and replace with curb and gutter and sidewalk. C. No driveways to Haven Avenue. D. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CltyofRC.us Page 9 0(19 E9—E14Pg214 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: LewisNan Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. Church Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Secondary with Median" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb and gutter as required. B. Provide sidewalk as required. C. Proposed driveway shall align with existing street on the opposite side and be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. D. Provide adequate sight distance for proposed driveway on Church Street, which may include removal of street trees within the median upon approval of the City Public Works Department. E. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 3. Terra Vista Parkway West frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Proposed driveway shall align with existing driveway on the opposite side a C. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 4. Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, along with three 11/4" innerducts in one of the 4" conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber -to -the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 5. Development impact fees will be collected at the building permits. This development is not subject to the drainage nor park impact fee. Note: fees are subject to change annually. 6. The existing ramps located at the southeast corner of Church and Haven, the southwest corner Church and Terra Vista, and the north west corner of Town Center and Terra Vista shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If the ramps do not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramps for compliance. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit or approval of final subdivision map whichever occurs first. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 7. The northwest portion between the existing channel and Haven Avenue is currently publically maintained. Update the existing maintenance area to meet the low maintenance requirements. "Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40 percent) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non -irrigated surfaces." In -lieu of updating the current LMD area, the City may quitclaim the existing LMD area and dedicate to the HOA for maintenance. Standard Conditions of Approval Printed: 4/13/2017 w ,CityofRC.us Page 10 of 19 E9—E14Pg215 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. Town Center Drive frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 9. This property has already joined the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts. 10. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Lines C7, C1, and C4 shall conform to City Standard 100-B. 11. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Church St: Side -walk Drive Appr. Street Trees Terra Vista: Street Trees Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 12. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 19 Printed: 4/13/2017 E9—E14Pg216 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan. Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per ADA Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan `check. 14. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Drainage facilities on -site shall be privately maintained and transition to a public storm drain at the right-of-way on Town Center Drive. Printed: 4/1312017 www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 19 E9—E14Pg217 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 16. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 17. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per .City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 18. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. vnvw.CityofRC.us Panted: 4/13/2017 Page 13 of 19 E9—E14Pg218 Project 4: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. 20. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 21. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 22. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 23. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the. following Special Conditions 1. Building and Fire Standard Conditions of Approval When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA 'Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as required by the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 19 E9—E14Pg219 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the 'Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 3. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 4. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 5. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 6. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 8. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 9. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. Printed: 4/13/2017 NMM/.cityofiRcros Page 15 0(19 E9—E14Pg220 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 15. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) 'Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 16. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Terra Vista Parkway) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 17. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 18. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 19. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed.4/13/2017 Page 16 of 19 E9—E14Pg221 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 21. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 22. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 23. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 24. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 25. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi -family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within multi -family developments shall include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the private street/drive aisle centerline. 26. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 27. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 28. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 29. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 30. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 31. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. Printed: 4/13/2017 ewwv.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 19 E9—E14Pg222 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 33. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 34. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 35. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 36. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 37. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 38. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 4/13/2017 �.CityofRC.us Page 18 0! 19 E9-E14Pg223 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 39. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 5/2/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 19 0(19 E9—E14Pg224 RESOLUTION NO. 17-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00716, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED ON -SITE PARKING RELATED TO THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 214-UNIT, MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON 12.1 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE MEDIUM HIGH (MH) DISTRICT (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1089- 031-36. A. Recitals 1. LVD Terra Vista, LLC filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2016- 00716, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of May 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway in the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan; and b. There is existing attached and detached residential development to the north within the Medium (M) District; to the south is commercial development within the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District; to the east is an office development within the Office Park (OPK) District; and to the west, across Haven Avenue, is vacant land within the Mixed Use (MU) District that is approved for a senior care facility and an existing commercial/office development within the General Commercial (GC) District. A flood control facility (Deer Creek Channel) runs along the northwest corner of the project site; and C. The subject Minor Exception (DRC2016-00716) is to reduce the total required parking by up to 29 parking spaces (5.6 percent). related to the development of a 214-unit, multiple -family for sale housing project (DRC2016-00713) on 21.1 acres of land; and E9—E14Pg225 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-37 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00716 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 2 Minor Exceptions permit an up to 25 percent reduction in the required on -site parking. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is consistent with the General Plan, which has stated policies supporting development projects that require infill development to be designed for pedestrians and automobiles equally, and to provide connections to transit and bicycle facilities (Policy LU-2.2). The proposed project provides 524 vehicle parking spaces as well as secured bicycle parking spaces, and provides convenient access for both pedestrians and automobiles. b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed for sale residential development is located at the intersection of two major streets and is adjacent to similar multi -family projects along with office and commercial land uses. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed reduction in the parking standards is necessary to allow increased residential density on the project site, which is located adjacent commercial and office land uses and provides convenient access to a transit stop. A parking study (Trames Solutions, Inc.; April 6, 2017) was submitted for the project verifying the adequacy of the proposed number of on -site parking spaces. The parking study provides a number of parking reduction initiatives that have been made conditions of approval including restricting the number of vehicles that may be parked on -site through a parking permit system, HOA inspections of the garage areas verifying that they are available to park two motor vehicles and providing secure bicycle storage areas. Additionally, the applicant will provide up to 29 additional on -street parking spaces that will offset the 29 parking space deficiency. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to reduce the required number of parking spaces where it can been demonstrated that the project will provide adequate on -site parking. A parking study (Trames Solutions, Inc.; April 6, 2017) was submitted for the project verifying the adequacy of the proposed number of on -site parking spaces. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the E9—E14Pg226 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-37 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00716 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 3 imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination,,a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the Minor Exception application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for Minor Exception DRC2016-00716, to reduce the total required parking by up to 29 parking spaces (5.6 percent) related to the development of a 214-unit, multi -family development located at the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway. —APN: 1077- 422-97. 2) Approval for Minor Exception DRC2016-00716 is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054 and Design Review DRC2016-00713. 3) Approval for Minor Exception DRC2016-00716 is contingent on City Council approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00715 and adoption of the related Mitigated Negative Declaration. 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. E9—E14Pg227 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-37 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC201.6-00716 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 4 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E9—E1'4Pg228 Conditions of Approval RCommunitYDevelopment Department Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. A certified Native American monitor acceptable to both the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation and the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians be on site during any and all ground disturbances. 2. Exterior Noise: 1) Any deck located within 93 feet of the centerline of Church Street and having direct line of site to the roadway or within 190 feet of the centerline of Haven Avenue shall provide a noise barrier 5 feet in height around the perimeter of the deck. 2) Solid block walls shall be provided along Haven Avenue and a portion of the south property line that range in height from 7 to 8-1/2 feet in height (see the Exhibit 3 in the acoustic report submitted for the project (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017 for the height and location of these walls). 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 4) Provide temporary noise barriers for all construction activities that take place in close proximity to the adjacent residences. Interior Noise: 5) A final acoustical report shall be submitted prior to approval of building permits to review the construction plans to verify the incorporation of the sound reduction measures outlined in the acoustic study (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017) and any additional mitigation measures deemed necessary to bring the project interior noise levels into conformance with the City's indoor noise standards. 6) Submit a letter from an acoustic engineer verifying that the recommended noise mitigation measures were incorporated prior to final Planning Department approval of any building within the project. Punted: 4/1=017 w .CityofRC.us E9-E14Pg229 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 LewisNan Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please he advised of the following Special Conditions 3. Traffic: 1) Provide an all -way stop control at the Terra Vista/Town Center Drive intersection. 2) Provide stop sign control at the project driveways. 3) On -site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. I' 4) Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 5. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 6. Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 7. Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 8. Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 9. Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 10. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Printed: 4/13/2017 w .CilyofRC.us Page 2 of 19 E9—E14Pg230 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 I Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11.If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 12.If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Printed; 4/13/2017 www.CltyofRC.us Page 3 of 19 E9—E14Pg231 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Location: Project Type: Lewis/Van Daele 214 f -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 14. Frontage public streets shall be swept according PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking the time of year of construction. to a schedule established by the City to reduce of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon 15. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site Iduring such episodes. i 16. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 17. The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 18. The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 19. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 20. Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 21. Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 22. Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. 23. Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. N. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 19 E9—E14Pg232 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 25. Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances i`lcluding low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 26. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 27. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 28. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 29. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 0(19 E9—E14Pg233 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24 inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 31. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 32. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 33. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. 34. Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird surrey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Printed: 4/13/2017 ww .CityofRC.us Page 6 of 19 E9—E14Pg234 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 35. Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre- construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre - construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non- migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre - construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 36. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. or weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Printed: 4/13/2017 WWW.CityofRC.Us Page 7 of 19 E9—E14Pg235 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Location: Project Type: Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 37. During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 38. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 39. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 40. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 41. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Madole & Associates, February 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 42. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 43. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 44. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 45. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 46. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. Printed: 4/13/2017 �.CilyofRC.us E9-E14Pg236 Page 8 of 19 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: LewisNan Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 47. All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 48. The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 49. The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 50. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 51. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 52. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 53. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 54. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 110& 55. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Haven Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Remove existing drive approach and replace with curb and gutter and sidewalk. C. No driveways to Haven Avenue. D. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. "Major Divided Arterial" Printed 4/13/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 9 or 19 E9—E14Pg237 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: LewisNan Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. Church Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Secondary with Median" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb and gutter as required. B. Provide sidewalk as required. C. Proposed driveway shall align with existing street on the opposite side and be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. D. Provide adequate sight distance for proposed driveway on Church Street, which may include removal of street trees within the median upon approval of the City Public Works Department. E. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 3. Terra Vista Parkway West frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Proposed driveway shall align with existing driveway on the opposite side a C. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 4. Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, along with three 1 '/a" innerducts in one of the 4" conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber -to -the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 5. Development impact fees will be collected at the building permits. This development is not subject to the drainage nor park impact fee. Note: fees are subject to change annually. 6. The existing ramps located at the southeast corner of Church and Haven, the southwest corner Church and Terra Vista, and the north west corner of Town Center and Terra Vista shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If the ramps do not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramps for compliance. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit or approval of final subdivision map whichever occurs first. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 7. The northwest portion between the existing channel and Haven Avenue is currently publically maintained. Update the existing maintenance area to meet the low maintenance requirements. "Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40 percent) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non -irrigated surfaces." In -lieu of updating the current LMD area, the City may quitclaim the existing LMD area and dedicate to the HOA for maintenance. Standard Conditions of Approval Printed: 4/13/2017 ww.v.CityofRC,us page 10 of 19 E9—E14Pg238 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. Town Center Drive frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 9. This property has already joined the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts. 10. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Lines C7, C1, and C4 shall conform to City Standard 100-B. 11. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Church St: Side -walk Drive Appr. Street Trees Terra Vista: Street Trees Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 12. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed: 4/13/2017 w .CllyolRC.us Page 11 of 19 E9—E14Pg239 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per ADA Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Drainage facilities on -site shall be privately maintained and transition to a public storm drain at the right-of-way on Town Center Drive. Printed: 4/13/2017 �.CityofRC.us Page l2a(19 E9—E14Pg240 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Location: LewisNan Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 16. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 17. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 18. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Printed: 4/13/2017 w .CilyolRC.us E9—E14Pg241 Page 13 of 19 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. 20. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 21. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 22. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 23. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Building and Fire Standard Conditions of Approval When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as required by the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 4/13/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 14 of 19 E9—E14Pg242 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-OD215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 3. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 4. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 5. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 6. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 8. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 9. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the, current adopted California Building Code. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. Panted: 4/13/2017 w .Cityol`RC.us Page 15 0(19 E9—E14Pg243 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 15. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ill Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 16. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Terra Vista Parkway) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 17. Prior to issuance 'of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 18. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 19. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. Printed: 4/13/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 16 of 19 E9—E14Pg244 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable'. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 21. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 22. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 23. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 24. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 25. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi -family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within multi -family developments shall include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the private street/drive aisle centerline. 26. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 27. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 28. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 29. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 30. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 31. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. Printed: 4/1312017 w .CityofRC.us Page 17 of 19 E9—E14Pg245 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 33. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 34. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 35. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 36. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 37. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 38.The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 19 E9—E14Pg246 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: Project Type: -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 39. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 19 Printed: 5/2/2017 E9—E14Pg247 RESOLUTION NO. 17-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00159, A REQUEST TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED PROPERTY LINE WALL HEIGHTS FROM 6 TO 8 FEET RELATED TO THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OFA214-UNIT, MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON 12.1 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE MEDIUM HIGH (MH) DISTRICT (14 - 24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREETAND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1089-031-36. A. Recitals 1. LVD Terra Vista, LLC filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2017- 00159, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application. 2. On the 10th day of May 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway in the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan; and b. There is existing attached and detached residential development to the north within the Medium (M) District; to the south is commercial development within the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District; to the east is an office development within the Office Park (OPK) District; and to the west, across Haven Avenue, is vacant land within the Mixed Use (MU) District that is approved for a senior care facility and an existing commercial/office development within the General Commercial (GC) District. A flood control facility (Deer Creek Channel) runs along the northwest corner of the project site; and C. The subject wall height Minor Exception (DRC2017-00159) is related to the development of a 214-unit,multiple-family for sale housing project (DRC2016-00713) on 21.1 acres of land; and E9—E14Pg248 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-38 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00159 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 2 d. The project includes walls that are over the 6-foot maximum height limit due to an up to 4-foot grade difference between the project site and the existing commercial development to the south. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. The increase in wall height is necessary due to an up to 4-foot grade change between the project site and the existing commercial development to the south. Without the Minor Exception, the applicant would be required to step the retaining walls, reducing the developable portion of the lot and the number of units that could be constructed on the project site. b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed residential development is located on a major thoroughfare that is in near proximity to similar multi -family projects and commercial land uses. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessaryto allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/orto accommodate unique site conditions. There is an up to 4-foot grade change between the project site and the commercial development to the south, which requires the construction of a property line retaining wall. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. It is common practice to permit additional wall height where there is a grade change between adjacent parcels of land. The increased wall height will not negatively impact the surrounding property owners as the developer will be required to install a wall with a decorative finish and the wall will not be out of keeping with other walls in the area. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment forthe application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the projectwould have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that E9—E14Pg249 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-38 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00159 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 3 the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the Minor Exception application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for Minor Exception DRC2017-00159, to construct combination walls up to 8-feet in height along the south property line of the project site related to the development of a 214-unit, multi -family development located at the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway. APN: 1077-422-97. 2) Approval for Minor Exception DRC2017-00159 is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054 and Design Review DRC2016-00713. 3) Approval for Minor Exception DRC2017-00159 is contingent upon City Council approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00715 and adoption of the related Mitigated Negative Declaration. 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. E9—E14Pg250 PLANNING COMMISSION IRESOLUTION NO. 17-38 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00159 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M- ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E9—E14Pg251 Conditions of Approval "ANC110 Community Development Department (:UCA1110NGA Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions A certified Native American monitor acceptable to both the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation and the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians be on site during any and all ground disturbances. i 2. Exterior Noise: 1) Any deck located within 93 feet of the centerline of Church Street and having direct line of site to the roadway or within 190 feet of the centerline of Haven Avenue shall provide a noise barrier 5 feet in height around the perimeter of the deck. 2) Solid block walls shall be provided along Haven Avenue and a portion of the south property line that range in height from 7 to 6-1/2 feet in height (see the Exhibit 3 in the acoustic report submitted for the project (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017 for the height and location of these walls). 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 4) Provide temporary noise barriers for all construction activities that take place in close proximity to the adjacent residences. Interior Noise: 5) A final acoustical report shall be submitted prior to approval of building permits to review the construction plans to verify the incorporation of the sound reduction measures outlined in the acoustic study (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017) and any additional mitigation measures deemed necessary to bring the project interior noise levels into conformance with the City's indoor noise standards. 6) Submit a letter from an acoustic engineer verifying that the recommended noise mitigation measures were incorporated prior to final Planning Department approval of any building within the project. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/13/2017 E9-E14Pg252 Project #: Proje It Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 LewisNan Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. Traffic: 1) Provide an all -way stop control at the Terra Vista/Town Center Drive intersection. 2) Provide stop sign control at the project driveways. 3) On -site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. 4) Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 5. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 6. Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 7. Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 8. Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 9. Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 10. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Printed 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us E9—E14Pg253 Page 2 of 19 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: LewisNan Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11.If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions t4 require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 12.If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. w .CiryofRC.us Printed: 4/1312017 Page 3 of 19 E9—E14Pg254 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214' Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13, The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 14. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 15. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during $uch episodes. 16. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 17. The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 18. The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 19. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 20. Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 21. Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 22. Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. 23. Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 24. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; Increased insulation. Limit air leakage through the structure. Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us page 4 of 19 E9—E14Pg255 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Location: Project Type: Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 25. Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterle�s urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 26. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 27. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 28. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 29. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. Printed: 4/13/2017 w .CityofRC.us E9-E14Pg256 Page 5 of 19 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24 inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 31. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 32. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 33. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. 34. Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Printed: 4/13/2017 W .CltyolRC.uS Page soils E9—E14Pg257 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Location: Project Type: Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 35. Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre- construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre - construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non- migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre - construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary"no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 36. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holida trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to an site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Printed: 4/13/2017 w .CityofRC.us ).m. and 6:30 a.m. on /. Additionally, if heavy i from the construction construction traffic haul feasible, the plan shall Page 7 of 19 E9—E14Pg258 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 37. During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 38. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NO[) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 39. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 40. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 41. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Madole & Associates, February 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 42. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 43. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 44. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 45. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 46. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. Printed: 4/13/2017 w .Cilyo Rc.us Page 8 of 19 E9—E14Pg259 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Location: Project Type: Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 47. All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 48. The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 49. The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 50. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 51. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 52. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 53. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 54. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 55. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Haven Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Remove existing drive approach and replace with curb and gutter and sidewalk. C. No driveways to Haven Avenue. D. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us "Major Divided Arterial" Page 9 of 19 E9—E14Pg260 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please he advised of the following Special Conditions 2. Church Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Secondary with Median" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb and gutter as required. B. Provide sidewalk as required. C. Proposed driveway shall align with existing street on the opposite side and be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. D. Provide adequate sight distance for proposed driveway on Church Street, which may include removal of street trees within the median upon approval of the City Public Works Department. E. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 3. Terra Vista Parkway West frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Proposed driveway shall align with existing driveway on the opposite side a C. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 4. Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, along with three 1 '/," innerducts in one of the 4" conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber -to -the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 5. Development impact fees will be collected at the building .permits. This development is not subject to the drainage nor park impact fee. Note: fees are subject to change annually. 6. The existing ramps located at the southeast corner of Church and Haven, the southwest corner Church and Terra Vista, and the north west corner of Town Center and Terra Vista shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If the ramps do not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramps for compliance. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit or approval of final subdivision map whichever occurs first. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 7. The northwest portion between the existing channel and Haven Avenue is currently publically maintained. Update the existing maintenance area to meet the low maintenance requirements. "Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40 percent) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non -irrigated surfaces." In -lieu of updating the current LMD area, the City may quitclaim the existing LMD area and dedicate to the HOA for maintenance. Standard Conditions of Approval Printed: 4/13/2017 w CityofRC.us Page 10 of 19 E9—E14Pg261 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. Town Center Drive frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 9. This property has already joined the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts. 10. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Lines C7, C1, and C4 shall conform to City Standard 100-B. 11. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Church St: Side -walk Drive Appr. Street Trees Terra Vista: Street Trees Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 12. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed: 4/13/2017 w .CltyofRC.us Page 11 of 19 E9—E14Pg262 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: LewisNan Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per ADA Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Drainage facilities on -site shall be privately maintained and transition to a public storm drain at the right-of-way on Town Center Drive. Printed: 4/13/2017 W .CityoiRC.us Page 12 of 19 E9—E14Pg263 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 16. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 17. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 18. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 19 E9—E14Pg264 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. 20. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 21. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 22. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 23. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Building and Fire Standard Conditions of Approval When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as required by the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Pdnted 4/13/2017 www.CltyofRC.us Page 14 of 19 E9—E14Pg265 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 3. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 4. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 5. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 6. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 8. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 9. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. w .CilyofRC.us Printed: 4/13/2017 Page 15 of 19 E9—E14Pg266 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 15. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; III) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 16. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Terra Vista Parkway) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 17. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 18. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading ,plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 19. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. Panted: 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.uS Page 16 of 19 E9—E14Pg267 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 LewisNan Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 21. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 22. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 23. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 24. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 25. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi -family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within multi -family developments shall include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the private street/drive aisle centerline. 26. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 27. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 28. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 29. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 30. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 31. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. w .CityofRC.us Pnnted: 4/13/2017 Page 17 of 19 E9—E14Pg268 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 33. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 34. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 35. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan, Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 36. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 37. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 38. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 4/13/2017 w .CityofRC.uS Page 18 of 19 E9—E14Pg269 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: LewisVan Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 39. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. vrnw.CityofRC.us Pnnted:5@/2017 Page 19 of 79 E9—E14Pg270 RESOLUTION NO. 17-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2017- 00215 - A REQUEST TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED WALL HEIGHT TO OVER 8 FEET FOR SOUND ATTENUATION PURPOSES RELATED TO THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 214- UNIT, MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON 12.1 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE MEDIUM HIGH (MH) DISTRICT (14- 24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1089- 031-36. A. Recitals. 1. LVD Terra Vista, LLC filed an application forthe approval of Variance DRC2017-00215, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of May 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista, Parkway in the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan; and b. There is existing attached and detached residential development to the north within the Medium (M) District; to the south is commercial development within the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District; to the east is an office development within the Office Park (OPK) District; and to the west, across Haven Avenue, is vacant land within the Mixed Use (MU) District that is approved for a senior care facility and an existing commercial/office development within the General Commercial (GC) District. A flood control facility (Deer Creek Channel) runs along the northwest corner of the project site; and C. The subject wall height Variance (DRC2017-00215) is related to the development of a 214-unit, multiple -family for sale housing project (DRC2016-00713) on 21.1 acres of land; and E9—E14Pg271 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-39 VARIANCE DRC2017-00215 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 2 d. The project includes up to 8.5 foot high property line wall along Haven Avenue and a portion of the south property line for noise attenuation purposes. The proposed sound wall was recommended by the Noise Assessment submitted for the project (Landrum and Brown, Inc., March 31, 2017). The applicant has submitted a Variance for the additional wall height (DRC2017- 00215). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. The increased wall height is necessary due to the project site being adjacent to a major thoroughfare, which greatly increase vehicle noise levels on the project site. Without the additional wall height, the project site would not be able to comply with the City's outdoor noise standards. b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. The project site is adjacent to a major thoroughfare with increased vehicle noise levels. The majority of residential development in the City is not exposed to vehicle noise levels in excess of City standards. C. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Without an increase in the permitted wall heights, the proposed development would be required to increase the building setbacks from the adjacent roadways, reducing the developable portion of the project site. d. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. It is common practice to grant a Variance for increased property line wall height for sound attenuation purposes where the project site is adjacent to a major thoroughfare. e. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The increased wall heights will not negatively impact the surrounding property owners as the walls will eitherface a public roadway or a commercial development owned by the same developer. The walls facing the public viewwill have a decorative finish. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidencethatthe projectwould have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration E9—E14Pg272 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-39 VARIANCE DRC2017-00215 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 3 was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the Variance application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for Variance DRC2017-00215, to construct an up to 8.5 foot high wall for sound attenuation purposes related to the development of a 214-unit, multi -family development located at the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway. APN: 1077-422-97. 2) Approval for Variance DRC2017-00215 is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20054 and Design Review DRC2016-008713. 3) Approval for Variance DRC2017-00215 is contingent upon City Council approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00715 and adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such E9—E14Pg273 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-39 VARIANCE DRC2017-00215 LVD TERRA VISTA, LLC May 10, 2017 Page 4 approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I1W Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E9—E14Pg274 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. A certified Native American monitor acceptable to both the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation and the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians be on site during any and all ground disturbances. I 2. Exterior Noise: 1) Any deck located within 93 feet of the centerline of Church Street and having direct line of site to the roadway or within 190 feet of the centerline of Haven Avenue shall provide a noise barrier 5 feet in height around the perimeter of the deck. 2) Solid block walls shall be provided along Haven Avenue and a portion of the south property line that range in height from 7 to 8-1/2 feet in height (see the Exhibit 3 in the acoustic report submitted for the project (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017 for the height and location of these walls). 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 4) Provide temporary noise barriers for all construction activities that take place in close proximity to the adjacent residences. Interior Noise: 5) A final acoustical report shall be submitted prior to approval of building permits to review the construction plans to verify the incorporation of the sound reduction measures outlined in the acoustic study (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017) and any additional mitigation measures deemed necessary to bring the project interior noise levels into conformance with the City's indoor noise standards. 6) Submit a letter from an acoustic engineer verifying that the recommended noise mitigation measures were incorporated prior to final Planning Department approval of any building within the project. Printed. 4/13/2017 w .CityofRC.us E9-E14Pg275 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. Traffic: 1) Provide an all -way stop control at the Terra Vista/Town Center Drive intersection. 2) Provide stop sign control at the project driveways. 3) On -site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. � � I 4) Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 5. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 6. Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 7. Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 8. Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 9. Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 10. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Printed: 4/1312017 w .CityofRC.us Page 2 of 19 E9-E14Pg276 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11. If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. I Consider establishing provisiohs to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 12.If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Printed:4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us E9—E14Pg277 Page 3 of 19 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2917-00215 Project Name: Lewis an Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 14. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 15. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 1 16. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 17. The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 18. The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 19. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 20. Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 21. Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 22. Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. 23. Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 24. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation. Limit air leakage through the structure. Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. Printed: 4/13/2077 www.CilyofRC.us Page 4 of 19 E9—E14Pg278 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 I Project Name: ' LewisNan Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 25. Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waIrless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 26. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 27. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 28. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 29. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. Panted: 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.uS Page 5 of 19 E9—E14Pg279 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24 inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 31. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 32. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 33. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. 34. Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologisf is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CityolRC.uS Page 6 off 9 E9—E14Pg280 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 35. Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre- construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre - construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non- migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre - construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have -left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 36. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.cityofRc.us Page 7 of 19 E9—E14Pg281 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 37. During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 38. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 39. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 40. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 41. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Madole & Associates, February 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 42. Construction or grading shall not take, place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 43. The.perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 44. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 45. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of. Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266,25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary priorto public hearing. 46. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. w .CltyofRC.us Printed: 4/13/2017 Page 8 of 19 E9—E14Pg282 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: LewisNan Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 47. All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 48. The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 49. The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 50. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 51. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 52. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 53, The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 54. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 55. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Haven Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Remove existing drive approach and replace with curb and gutter and sidewalk. C. No driveways to Haven Avenue. D. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. Printed: 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.uS Page 9 of 19 E9—E14Pg283 Project #: Project Name Location: Project Type: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. Church Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Secondary with Median" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb and gutter as required. B. Provide sidewalk as required. C. Proposed driveway shall align with existing street on the opposite side and be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. D. Provide adequate sight distance for proposed driveway on Church Street, which may include removal of street trees within the median upon approval of the City Public Works Department. E. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 3. Terra Vista Parkway West frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Proposed driveway shall align with existing driveway on the opposite side a C. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 4. Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, along with three 1 ''/d' innerducts in one of the 4" conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber -to -the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 5. Development impact fees will be collected at the building permits. This development is not subject to the drainage nor park impact fee. Note: fees are subject to change annually. 6. The existing ramps located at the southeast corner of Church and Haven, the southwest corner Church and Terra Vista, and the north west corner of Town Center and Terra Vista shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If the ramps do not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramps for compliance. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit or approval of final subdivision map whichever occurs first. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 7. The northwest portion between the existing channel and Haven Avenue is currently publically maintained. Update the existing maintenance area to meet the low maintenance requirements. "Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40 percent) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non -irrigated surfaces." In -lieu of updating the current LMD area, the City may quitclaim the existing LMD area and dedicate to the HOA for maintenance. Standard Conditions of Approval Printed; 4/13/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 19 E9—E14Pg284 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: LewisNan Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. Town Center Drive frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector' standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 9. This property has already joined the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts. 10. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Lines C7, C1, and C4 shall conform to City Standard 100-B. 11. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Church St: Side -walk Drive Appr. Street Trees Terra Vista: Street Trees Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 12. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed: 4/13/2017 W .CityofRC.Us Page 11 0(19 E9—E14Pg285 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per ADA Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Drainage ,facilities on -site shall be privately maintained and transition to a public storm drain at the right-of-way on Town Center Drive. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/13/2017 Page 12 of 19 E9—E14Pg286 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 16. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 17. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 18. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Printed: 4/13/2017 w .CltyofRC.us Page 13 of 19 E9—E14Pg287 Project #: Project Name Location: Project Type: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. 20. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 21. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 22. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 23. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Building and Fire Standard Conditions of Approval When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as required by the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. �wvw.CityofRC.us Printed4/13/2017 Page 14 of 19 E9—E14Pg288 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the 'Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 3. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 4. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 5. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 6. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. S. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 9. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. Printed: 4/13/2017 w .CityofRC.uS Page 15 of 19 E9—E14Pg289 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14, Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 15. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 16. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Terra Vista Parkway) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 17. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 18. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 19. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. www.CityofRC.us Panted: 4/13/2017 Page 16 of 19 E9—E14Pg290 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 21. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 22. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be,permeable. 23. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 24. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 25. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi -family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within multi -family developments shall include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the private street/drive aisle centerline. 26. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 27. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 28. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 29. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 30. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 31. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. Printed: 4 /1312017 w .Cilyol`RC.as Page 17 of 19 E9—E14Pg291 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: Project Type: -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 33. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 34. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 35. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 36. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 37. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 38. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. w .CityofRC.us Page 18 of 19 Printed: 4/13/2017 E9—E14Pg292 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC20 )7-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 39. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water TreatmeInt Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environment TI Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/2/2017 Page 19 of 19 E9—E14Pg293 Conditions of Approval jjANcrw Community Development Department (�IICAMONGA Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. A certified Native American monitor acceptable to Kizh Nation and the San Manuel Band of Mission disturbances. 2. Exterior Noise: both the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Indians be on site during any and all ground I 1) Any deck located within 93 feet of the centerline of Church Street and having direct line of site to the roadway or within 190 feet of the centerline of Haven Avenue shall provide a noise barrier 5 feet in height around the perimeter of the deck. 2) Solid block walls shall be provided along Haven Avenue and a portion of the south property line that range in height from 7 to 8-1/2 feet in height (see the Exhibit 3 in the acoustic report submitted for the project (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017 for the height and location of these walls). 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 4) Provide temporary noise barriers for all construction activities that take place in close proximity to the adjacent residences. Interior Noise: 5) A final acoustical report shall be submitted prior to approval of building permits to review the construction plans to verify the incorporation of the sound reduction measures outlined in the acoustic study (Landrum & Brown; March 27, 2017) and any additional mitigation measures deemed necessary to bring the project interior noise levels into conformance with the City's indoor noise standards. 6) Submit a letter from an acoustic engineer verifying that the recommended noise mitigation measures were incorporated prior to final Planning Department approval of any building within the project. w .Cityc Rc.us Panted: 5/4/2017 E9—E14Pg294 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-002j15 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: Project Type: -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. Traffic: 1) Provide an all -way stop control at the Terra Vista/Town Center Drive intersection. 2) Provide stop sign control at the project driveways. 3) On -site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. 4) Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 6. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 7. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 8. All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 9. The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved .roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 10. The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 11. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. w .cityofRC.us Printed: 5/4/2017 Page 2 of 19 E9—E14Pg295 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, D;RC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 13. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. I 14. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 15. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 16. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. 17. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. Phase grading,to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24 inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 18. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 19. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 20.Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. Printed: 5/4/2077 www.CiryofRC.us Page 3 of 19 E9—E14Pg296 Project #: Project Name: Location: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00;215 Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 22. Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 23. Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. ?4. All residential I and commercial structures shall be r�quired to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 25. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 26. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. 27. Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Printed: 5/4/2017 www.CilyofRC.us E9—E14Pg297 Page 4 of 19 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: LewisNan Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 28. Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre- construction survey shall bel provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre - construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non- migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre - construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. www.CityolRC.us Printed: 5/4/2017 Page 5 0(19 E9—E14Pg298 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713 DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 29.If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 30.If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor,, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Printed: 5/4/2017 wvwd.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 19 E9—E14Pg299 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 31. The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 32. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 33. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 34. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 35. The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed'areas as quickly as possible. 36. The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 37. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 38. Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 39. Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 40. Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. 41. Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 42. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. w .CityofRC.us Printed: 5/4/2017 Page 7 of 19 E9—E14Pg300 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 43. Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 44. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 45. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 46. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 47. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 48. During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 49. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Printed: 5/4/2017 w .CltyofRC.uS Page 8 of 19 E9—E14Pg301 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 50. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 51. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 52. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Madole & Associates, February 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 53. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 54. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 55. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The existing ramps located at the southeast corner of Church and Haven, the southwest corner Church and Terra Vista, and the north west corner of Town Center and Terra Vista shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If the ramps do not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramps for compliance. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit or approval of final subdivision map whichever occurs first. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 2. Development impact fees will be collected at the building permits. This development is not subject to the drainage nor park impact fee. Note: fees are subject to change annually. Printed:.5/4/2017 v.nvw.CityoiRC,us Page 9 0(19 E9—E14Pg302 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, along with three 1 W innerducts in one of the 4" conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber -to -the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 4. The northwest portion between the existing channel and Haven Avenue is currently publically maintained. Update the existing maintenance area to meet the low maintenance requirements. "Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40 percent) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non -irrigated surfaces." In -lieu of updating the current LMD area, the City may quitclaim the existing LMD area and dedicate to the HOA for maintenance. 5. Haven Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Remove existing drive approach and replace with curb and gutter and sidewalk. C. No driveways to Haven Avenue. D. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 6. Church Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Secondary with Median" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb and gutter as required. B. Provide sidewalk as required. C. Proposed driveway shall align with existing street on the opposite side and be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. D. Provide adequate sight distance for proposed driveway on Church Street, which may include removal of street trees within the median upon approval of the City Public Works Department. E. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 7. Terra Vista Parkway West frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Proposed driveway shall align with existing driveway on the opposite side a C. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. Standard Conditions of Approval 8. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Lines C7, C1, and C4 shall conform to City Standard 100-B. 9. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Drainage facilities on -site shall be privately maintained and transition to a public storm drain at the right-of-way on Town Center Drive. Printed: 5/4/2017 wiwJ.CilyofRC.uS Page 10 of 19 E9—E14Pg303 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 11. This property has already joined the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts. 12. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Church St: Side -walk Drive Appr. Street Trees Terra Vista: Street Trees Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed; 5/4/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 19 E9—E14Pg304 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Ennineeringi Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per ADA Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. w .CityofRC.us Pnnted: 5/4/2017 Page 12 of 19 E9—E14Pg305 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree, installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 16. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 17. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 18. Town Center Drive frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as required. B. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required. 19. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric servit electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement an Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Ranchc Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical project related development. 20. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. :e and shall construct 1 Rancho Cucamonga Cucamonga Municipal service provider for all Printed: 5/4/2017 w .CityofRcros Page 13 of 19 E9—E14Pg306 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 22. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 23. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The CC&RR's must specifically include the following restriction and homeowners with this feature in their condominium must sign disclosures asserting to this restriction during the escrow process: "Natural Gas, LPG and/or Solid Fuel BBQ's, Fire Tables, Fire Pits and/or Heaters on roof decks are not permitted". Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Building and Fire Standard Conditions of Approval When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as required by the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. Pnnted: 5/4/2017 w .CltyofRc,us Page 14 of 19 E9—E14Pg307 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Lewis/Van Daele 214 -- - 107742297-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the FinalGrading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi -family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within multi -family developments shall include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the private street/drive aisle centerline. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. Printed: 5/4/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 19 E9—E14Pg308 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 18. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 19. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Terra Vista Parkway) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 21. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 22. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. Printed: 5!4/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 19 E9—E14Pg309 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 24. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 27. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 28. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 29. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 30. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 31. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 5/4/2017 ww.v.Cityofl2C.us Page 17 0! 19 E9—E14Pg310 Project #: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: --- 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 33. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 34. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 35. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 36. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. www.CilyofRC.us Printed: 5/4/2017 Page 18 of 19 E9—E14Pg311 Project#: SUBTT20054 DRC2016-00713, DRC2016-00715, DRC2016-00716, DRC2017-00159, DRC2017-00215 Project Name: Lewis/Van Daele 214 Location: -- - 107742297-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Specific Plan Amendment, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors'. 39. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 5/4/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 79 of 19 E9—E14Pg312