Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-12-13 - Agenda Packet - PC-HPCDECEMBER 1 ill ALU I r HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca Vice Chairman Macias Commissioner Fletcher Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Wimberly B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Ci, PRESENTATION OF A RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION FOR JEFF BLOOM, RETIRING DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C2. PRESENTATION OF A RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION HONORING COMMISSIONER RICHARD B. FLETCHER Page 1 of 6 VCVCjV10r_ % 1 %ij LV 1 I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. Di. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 8, 2017 E. DIRECTOR'S STAFF REPORTS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chairman may open the meeting for public input. E1. UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE CHINATOWN HOUSE LOCATED AT 9591 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD — ORAL REPORT E2. UPDATE ON POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT APPLICABLE TO HAUNTED HOUSES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS E3. UPDATE ON URGENCY ORDINANCE ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL APPLICABLE TO NEW HOTEL DEVELOPMENT F. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. Page 2of6 VGLrC1V10r-r% 1 %JJ LV 1 I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA F1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19823 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to subdivide one (1) existing parcel into three (3) parcels in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings on a 13.96-acre site within the Industrial Park (IP) District located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue — APN: 0210-08143 (formerly APN: 0210-081-19 and a portion of APN: 0210-081-20). Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017- 00408, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00402 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to construct an industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District —APN: 0210-081-43 (formerly APN: 0210-081-19 and a portion of APN: 0210-081-20). Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2017-00404 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to establish a Uniform Sign Program related to a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District — APN: 0210-081-43 (formerly APN: 0210-081-19 and a portion of APN: 0210-081-20). Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2017-00405 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to remove existing trees in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District — APN: 0210-081-43 (formerly APN: 0210-081-19 and a portion of APN: 0210-081-20). Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016- 00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Page 3 of 6 aim..CIVIor-K 14, ACV 1 I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION ORC2017-00406 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to reduce the required setback for average depth of landscape along Fourth Street and Utica Avenue by a maximum of ten (10%) percent in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District — APN: 0210-081-43 (formerly APN: 0210- 081-19 and a portion of APN: 0210-081-20). Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00408 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to increase the height of the screen wall along Trademark North Parkway by a maximum of 2 feet in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District—APN: 0210-081-43 (formerly APN: 0210-081-19 and a portion of APN: 0210-081- 20). Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. G. COMMISSION BUSINEWHISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: Page 4 of 6 Lor—%.r—IVIDam 1 aq d.v I I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA H. ADJOURNMENT The Commission will adjourn to a workshop held in the Rains Room to discuss the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Specific Plan DRC2095- 00750. I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 7, 2017, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Yd Lois J.1tchrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the Page 5 of 6 LVGVGIN[aQr% 1 *J� LV 1 l HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,725 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Page 6 of 6 Vicinity Map Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting 1 3ase Line 'oothi Arrow 8th d December 13, 2017 L Y L U Base Line Church = Foothill Arrow I t 1 6th w 4th * Meeting Location: F1 6 City Hall/Council Chamber. 10600 Civic Center Drive E1: Update on the Chinatown House 9591 San Bernardino Road —Oral Report E2: Update on Haunted Houses/Citywide/Residential Districts -Not shown on map E3: Update on Hotels/Citywide-Not shown on map F1-6:-SUBTPM19823; Design Review DRC2017-00402; USP DRC2017-00404; TRP DRC2017- 00405 ; ME DRC2017-00406 and ME DRC2017-00408---Northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street INII�I No 1vUVr-1V1 r-M o, cv i r HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 7:06 P.M. Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca X Vice Chairman Macias X Commissioner Fletcher X Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Wimberly _A_ Additional Staff Present Candyce Burnett City Planner, Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney, Albert Espinoza, Asst. City Engineer, Dominick Perez, Associate Planner, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Mike Smith, Senior Planner, Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None Page 1 of 8 DI—Pgl ICI V V CJv1Dr_M O, LV I f HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission atone time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of October 25, 2017 C2, Consideration to adopt Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) Minutes of October 25, 2017 Moved by Munoz seconded by Macias carried 3-0-1-1 (Fletcher abstain, Wimberly absent) to adopt the Consent Calendar. D. PUBLIC HEARINGS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION I The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chairman may open the meeting for public input. Chairman Oaxaca recommended Items D1, El, E2, E3, and E4 be heard concurrently. D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2017-00485 — MANNING HOMES — A request for a historic landmark designation for a single-family residence in conjunction with a 20-lot subdivision of about 5.43 acres of land within the Low Residential (L) District (2.0 to 4.0 dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Victoria Street; APN: 1076-081-01; Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20080, Design Review DRC2017-00129, Variance DRC2017-00130, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00131. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) . She noted one letter was received from San Bernardino County Public works and was just an informational letter; no response required. Page 2 of 8 D1--Pg2 nuvr- omm 05 AU 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing Seeing and hearing no comment, Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing. Jim Manning of Manning Homes concurred with the report offered thanks to Ms. Cavazos fr her assistance through the process. He noted this is the 3rd historic home they have done in the city Commissioner Macias said he had no major issues. Commissioner Fletcher agreed and said he has nice renderings and he supports the opportunity to preserve the historic house. He said the developer has done a good job in the past and the City appreciates it. Commissioner Munoz said ditto and remarked that it looks like a good project and design. He said he appreciates the efforts of Manning Homes. Chairman Oaxaca said he appreciates Manning Homes and was familiar with their work at the Johnson House, He said he is glad Manning is taking on another one. For Items 131, and E1-E4 the following actions were taken Moved by Munoz seconded by Fletcher carried 4-0-1 (Wimberly absent) to adopt the resolution recommending approval of Landmark Designation DRC2017-00485 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Moved by Munoz seconded by Fletcher carried 4-0-1 (Wimberly absent) to adopt the resolutions approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20080, Design Review DRC2017-00129_ and Variance DRC2017-00131. E. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be Page 3 of 8 D 1—Pg3 IVVVCIVIt3cm 01 AV 1 I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. E1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20080 — MANNING HOMES — A review of a proposed 20-lot subdivision on a parcel of about 5.43 acres of land in the Low Residential (L) District (2,0 to 4.0 dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Victoria Street; APN: 1076-081-01; Related files- Design Review DRC2017-00129, Variance DRC2017-00130, Minor Exception DRC2017-00131, and Landmark Designation DRC2017-00485. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00129 — MANNING HOMES —A request for site plan and architectural review of 19 single-family residential homes and relocation of an existing single-family residence in conjunction with a 20-lot subdivision of about 5.43 acres of land within the Low Residential (L) District (2.0 to 4.0 dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Victoria Street; APN:1076-081- 01; Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20080, Variance DRC2017-00130, Minor Exception DRC2017-00131, and Landmark Designation DRC2017-00485. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration E3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2017-00130 — MANNING HOMES — A request to reduce the average lot size from 8,000 square feet to 7,977 square feet in conjunction with a 20-lot subdivision of about 5.43 acres in the Low Residential (L) District (2.0 to 4.0 dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Victoria Street; APN: 1076-081-01; Related files: Tentative Tract Map 20080, Design Review DRC2017-00129, Minor Exception DRC2017-00131, and Landmark Designation DRC2017- 00485. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. E4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00131--MANNING HOMES — A request to increase the maximum wall height from 6 feet to a maximum of 7 112 feet for a perimeter wall that will be constructed in conjunction with a 20-lot subdivision of about 5.43 acres of land within the Low Residential (L) District (2.0 to 4.0 dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Victoria Street; APN: 1076-081- 01; Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20080, Design Review DRC2017-00129, Variance DRC2017-00130, and Landmark Designation DRC2017-00485. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Page 4 of 8 D1—Pg4 nuvC1vit r-K o, ACV I r HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA E5. TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755 — GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. — A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17444) related to a 13-unit condominium development on 2.17 acres of land in the Low Medium (LM) District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Archibald Avenue 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street — APN: 0202-131-27, 61 and 62. On October 10, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the project within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) The applicant chose not to speak. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. Moved by Fletcher seconded by Macias carried 4-0-1 (Wimberly absent) to adopt the resolution approving Time Extension DRC2017-00755 with the amended conditions, Chairman Oaxaca recommended Items E6, E7 and E8 be heard concurrently. E6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00931 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR IDS REAL ESTATE GROUP - A request to amend the Empire Lakes Specific Plan to increase the allowable FAR from 0.35 to 0.50 within Planning Area 5 of the specific plan to allow for the construction a 232,058 square foot warehouse logistics and office building on a property comprised of five (5) parcels with a combined area 515,690 square feet (11.84 acres) which currently contains remnants of an abandoned parking lot and a vacant pad located at the northeast corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue - APN: 0210-082-78, -79, -84, -89 and -90. Related Files: Design Review DRC2016-00670 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00671. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Page 5of8 D1—Pg5 IVVVClvior-[ oy LU 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA E7. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2016-00670 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR IDS REAL ESTATE GROUP - A review of a proposal to construct a 232,058-square foot warehouse logistics and office building on a vacant site of 11.84 acres located within Planning Area 5 of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan at the northeast corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue - APN: 0210-082-78, -79, -84, -89 and -90. Related Files: Specific Plan Amendment DRC2016-00931 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00671. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E8_ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00671 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR IDS REAL ESTATE GROUP - A review of a proposal to remove 128 existing trees on a vacant property to allow for the construction of a 232,058- square foot warehouse logistics and office building on a vacant site of 11.84 acres located within Planning Area 5 of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan at the northeast corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue - APN: 0210-082-78, -79, -84, -89 and -90. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00671 and Specific Plan Amendment DRC2016-00931. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Dominick Perez_ Associate Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Chuck Buquet of Charles Joseph Associates, 9581 Business Center Drive said he was diligent addressing the correspondence noted in the report. He said the project is in full conformance with CEQA. The building will be an attractive industrial building. He said he has worked with IDS before and they have a positive history with RC. Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing: Moved by Munoz seconded by Macias (Wimberly absent) carried to adopt the resolution recommending approval of Specific Plan Amendment DRC2016-00931 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. The Planning Commission adopted the resolutions approving Development Review DRC2016-00670 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016.00671. Page 6 of 8 D1—Pg6 vivvr-mor-M o, ,cv I r HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA F. COMMISSION BUSINEWHISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: Commissioner Munoz said the League Board meets at the end of the month. He thanked staff for all the work on the annexation plan -staff is doing an excellent jab in reaching out to the public. He said it is difficult for the public to understand, they have lots of questions, and it is not always easy. He said staff is excellent at presenting, some folks are coming repeatedly, and staff is responding well. He said our state requires exhaustive efforts and much information the public is asking for is not available now, but will be when the EIR is prepared. He said this is a tough job and is important to the public_ Chairman Oaxaca agreed and noted some conversations can be charged and emotional and pointed out the importance of getting correct information and facts out. He said staff is going the extra mite. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: G. ADJOURNMENT 8:05 P. M. 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 2, 2017 seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 7 of 8 D1-Pg7 IrVYGIYI�GiC V, LV 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda. please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours. Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,725 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Page 8 of 8 D1—Pg8 REPORT DATE: December 13, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City PlannT5&-- INITIATED BY: Dat Tran, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: UPDATE ON POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT APPLICABLE TO HAUNTED HOUSES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS BACKGROUND: At the Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 2017, staff prepared a Development Code Amendment recommending prohibition of commercial haunted houses in residential areas and presented it to the Planning Commission. Following discussion, the Planning Commission voted in favor of recommending approval of the Amendment to the City Council. Staff then prepared a Staff Report and Ordinance codifying the Amendment for the City Council's review and consideration and presented it to the City Council on September 6, 2017. At the meeting, the City Council reviewed the Ordinance and received public testimony. Following discussion, the City Council remanded the Ordinance back to staff to gather additional data for further review. The City Council indicated that the proximity of the Halloween season afforded staff opportune time to observe the haunted houses in operation and collect data. DATA COLLECTION SUMMARY: During the weekend preceding Halloween and on Halloween night, staff conducted a series of unannounced visits to the haunted houses at 7611 Duck Creek Place and 10185 Palo Alto Street. Staff visited both locations on three separate occasions before Halloween, and twice during each of the nights they operated. During the visits before Halloween while the haunted houses were under construction, staff observed no traffic and limited noise impacts to the neighborhood. During the Saturday before Halloween at 7611 Duck Creek Place, and on Halloween night for both locations, staff encountered significantly more traffic and noise impacts to both neighborhoods. Large numbers of vehicles were observed parked along the various streets and cul-de-sacs, spilling over into adjacent neighborhoods. Pedestrian safety was earnestly attended to by haunted house operators, but staff did observe pedestrian violations. The haunted houses maintained a constant flow of visitors, with a peak of 40-50 people in line at 7611 Duck Creek Place, and 70-80 people at 10185 Palo Alto. Noise levels were high throughout both neighborhoods. Overall, both neighborhoods had a festive atmosphere, due to the operation of the haunted houses but also to the number of other decorated homes in the neighborhood. NEXT STEPS: Staff will prepare a follow-up Staff Report to update the City Council on observations of the haunted houses in January. Depending on the actions of the City Council, the existing Amendment as proposed may be remanded to staff and/or the Planning Commission for additional review. A new Staff Report, draft Development Code Amendment and presentation would then be brought to a future Planning Commission meeting detailing the necessary changes E2—Pg 1 PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTOR'S REPORT UPDATE ON HAUNTED HOUSE REGULATIONS December 13, 2017 Page 2 to regulate haunted houses, if any_ The Planning Commission will have an opportunity at that time to review the new draft Development Code Amendment and recommend any changes as necessary. E2—Pg 2 REPORT DATE: December 13, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner a INITIATED BY: Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner SUBJECT: UPDATE ON URGENCY ORDINANCE ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL APPLICABLE TO NEW HOTEL DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND: Pursuant to State law, Government Code Section 65858 (Exhibit A), a city may enact an interim Zoning Ordinance on an urgency basis to protect the public safety, health, and welfare by prohibiting any use(s) that may be in conflict with a contemplated change to a city's General Plan, Specific Plan, zoning requirements, or any such change that a city is intending to study within a reasonable period of time. On October 4, 2017, the City Council approved Urgency Ordinance No. 919 (Exhibit B), requiring a Conditional Use Permit for the establishment of any new hotel or the expansion of any existing hotel within the City to allow staff time to study the issue and draft any necessary changes to the Municipal Code. Per State law, the interim ordinance is effective for a period of 45 days from the date of adoption, unless extended at a public hearing prior to the end of the 45-day period. On November 15, 2017, the City Council approved Urgency Ordinance No. 923 (Exhibit C), which extended the requirement for a Conditional Use Permit for the establishment of any new hotel or the expansion of any existing hotel within the City for an additional 10 months, 15 days, to provide staff additional time to study the issue and draft a code amendment to properly address the impacts created by hotel development within the City. CURRENT STATUS: Planning staff is studying the issue of hotel development and impacts to cities across the country. This includes learning about the management and franchise structure of hotel development and understanding the different classes of hotels offered by major hotel chains. From a land use perspective, we are evaluating all zones in which hotels are permitted to develop and analyzing land use patterns for potential hotel development. We are using the research already compiled on the negative impacts of hotel development and researching best practices across the country for zoning and development regulations that will promote beneficial hotel development within the City. We are also partnering with other city departments including Fire, Police, Building and Safety and Community Improvement to gather input and ensure that all concerns are addressed. We will then develop a code amendment for consideration prior to the expiration of the urgency ordinance. The Planning Commission will be given an opportunity to review the draft amendment language prior to forwarding the amendment to the City Council for final action. E3—Pg 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UPDATE ON URGENCY ORDINANCE FOR HOTEL DEVELOPMENT December 13, 2017 Page 2 EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Government Code Section 65858 Exhibit B - City Council Staff Report Dated October 4, 2017 Exhibit C - City Council Staff Report Dated November 15, 2017 CB:JN/Is E3—Pg 2 AUTHENTICATED ELECTROMCtECAL MATERIAL State of California GOVERNMENT CODE Section 65858 65858. (a) Without following the procedures otherwis:: required prior to the adoption of a zoning ordinance, the legislative body of a county, city, including a charter city, or city and county, to protect the public safety, health, and welfare, may adopt as an urgency measure an interim ordinance prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the legislative body, planning commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. That urgency measure shall require a four -fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption. The interim ordinance shall be of no further force and effect 45 days from its date of adoption. After notice pursuant to Section 65090 and public hearing, the legislative body may extend the interim ordinance for 10 months and 15 days and subsequently extend the interim ordinance for one year. Any extension shall also require a four -fifths vote for adoption. Not more than two extensions may be adopted. (b) Alternatively, an interim ordinance may be adopted by a four -fifths vote following notice pursuant to Section 65090 and public hearing, in which case it shall be of no further force and effect 45 days from its date of adoption. After notice pursuant to Section 65090 and public hearing, the legislative body may by a four -fifths vote extend the interim ordinance for 22 months and 15 days. (c) The legislative body shall not adopt or extend any interim ordinance pursuant to this section unless the ordinance contains legislative findings that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, and that the approval of additional subdivisions, use permits, variances, building permits, or any other applicable entitlement for use «-hich is required in order to comply with a zoning ordinance would result in that thucat to public health, safety, or welfare. In addition, any interim ordinance adopted pursuant to this section that has the effect of denying approvals needed for the development of projects with a significant component of multifamily housing may not be extended except upon written findings adopted by the legislative body, supported by substantial evidence on the record, that all of the following conditions exist: (1) The continued approval of the development of multifamily housing projects would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety. As used in this paragraph, a "specific, adverse impact" means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date that the ordinance is adopted by the legislative body. EXHIBIT A E3--Pg 3 (2) The interim ordinance is necessary to mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact identified pursuant to paragraph (1). (3) There is no feasible alternative to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact identified pursuant to paragraph (1) as well or better, with a less burdensome or restrictive effect, than the adoption of the proposed interim ordinance. (d) Ten days prior to the expiration of that interim ordinance or any extension, the legislative body shall issue a wttitten report describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the ordinance. (c) When an interim ordinance has been adopted, every subsequent ordinance adopted pursuant to this section, covering the whole or a part of the same property, shall automatically terminate and be of no further farce or effect upon the tennination of the first interim ordinance or any extension of the ordinance as provided in this Section. (f) Notwithstanding subdivision (c), upon tennination of a prior interim ordinance, the legislative body may adopt another interim ordinance pursuant to this section provided that the new interim ordinance is adopted to protect the public safety, health, and welfare from an event, occurrence, or set of circumstances different from the event, occurrence, or set of circumstances that led to the adoption of tile prior interim ordinance. (g) For purposes of this section, "development of multifamily housing projects" does not include the demolition, conversion, redevelopment, or rehabilitation of multifamily housing that is affordable to lower income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Codc, or that will result in an increase in the price or reduction of the number of affordable units in a multifamily housing project. (h) For purposes of this section, "projects with a significant component of multifamily housing" means projects in which multifamily housing consists of at least one-third of the total square footage of the project. (Amended by Stats. 2001, Ch. 939, Sec. 1. Effective January I, 2002.) E3—Pg 4 REPORT DATE: October 4, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Candyce Burnett, City Planner Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT URGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 919, TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW HOTELS IN ALL ZONES FOR A PERIOD OF 45 DAYS RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Urgency Interim Zoning Ordinance No. 919 entitled "An Interim Zoning Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Enacted Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 Requiring a Conditional Use Permit for the Establishment of New Hotels or the Expansion of Existing Hotels, Declaring the Urgency Thereof and Making A Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act' by four -fifths vote by title only. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to State law, Government Code Section 65858, a city may enact an interim Zoning Ordinance on an urgency basis to protect the public safety, health, and welfare by prohibiting any use(s) that may be in conflict with a contemplated change to a city's General Plan, Specific Plan: zoning requirements, or any such change that a city is intending to study within a reasonable period of time. If approved, the interim ordinance will be effective for a period of 45 days from the date of adoption, unless extended prior to the end of the 45 day period. An urgency ordinance may be extended at a public hearing by a four -fifths vote of the Council. Hotels are facilities with guest rooms or suites, provided with or without kitchen facilities, rented to the general public for transient lodging. Hotels typically include a variety of services in addition to lodging, for example, restaurants, meeting facilities, swimming pools, tennis courts, indoor athletic facilities and personal services. There are currently no regulations in effect regarding the operational standards required for hotels (i.e. security, lighting, staffing and cooperation with law enforcement). ANALYSIS: Hotels can become a convenient location for certain types of criminal activity and have in many instances become associated with criminal activity in many cities throughout Southern California and the United States. The manufacture of methamphetamine and other types of illegal drugs has occurred in Hotels, damaging property and endangering other Hotel guests. Hotels, especially when used for extended stays, are also a convenient destination for prostitution and sex trafficking. Examples of this type of activity from other jurisdictions include: Page 1 of 3 FXNIRIT 8 E3—Pg 5 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT URGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO, 919, TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT EXTENDED STAY HOTELS IN ALL ZONES FOR A PERIOD OF 45 DAYS OCTOBER 4, 2017 1. In 2014, a man was arrested at a hotel in Braintree, MA after threatening an 18-year old girls because "she wasn't working" as a prostitute. 2. In 2015 the City of Dallas, TX fled suit against the owners of a hotel after more than 40 drug -related arrests, in addition to four prostitution gusts and numerous other crimes took place there in preceding years. 3_ "Meth labs" have been discovered in hotels in places such as Springfield, MO, Rockdale County, FL, DeKalb County, GA and Lone Tree, CO, among others. In addition, hotels are often used as semi -permanent housing solutions for individuals unable to afford permanent housing, which leads to the creation of unauthorized residential uses on commercial properties in ways that were never intended and often are problematic. Some hotels have been known to actively market their units as an alternative to student housing for college and trade school students, again creating a more permanent type of unauthorized residential use on a commercial property, in a manner which is unsupported and may cause conflict with adjacent uses. There are currently nine hotels within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Most of these hotels have been built in the last 5-9 years; particularly in the last 3 years the City has seen a proliferation of requests for hotels in all categories, including business, extended stay and general categories_ The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department has recently noted an increase in calls for service from Hotels within the City. in the last 20 months' there have been over 1200 calls for service at all hotels within the City. While current hotel operators generally work well with the City in a cooperative manner to address these concerns, staff is concerned that without additional tools to regulate the siting and operation of hotels, the current call volume could increase significantly and the City may experience problems similar to what has happened in other jurisdictions. Because of the concerns noted above, Staff believes there is an current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare presented by the establishment of new hotels and the expansion of existing hotels within the City without further regulation of hotel locations and operations. There are currently no regulations in effect regarding the operational standards required for hotels (i.e. security, lighting, staffing and cooperation with law enforcement). If new hotels are established or existing hotel uses are expanded without appropriate review and regulation, it could lead to an increase in drug and prostitution -related crime. New or expanded hotels could also have adverse secondary impacts on neighborhoods and result in significant irreversible change to neighborhood and community character. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enacting an interim urgency ordinance on hotels furthers the City Council's public safety goals by appropriately regulating and reviewing hotels to prevent criminal activity and create unauthorized residential uses on commercial properties. Page 2 of 3 E3—Pg 6 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT URGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 919, TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT EXTENDED STAY HOTELS IN ALL ZONES FOR A PERIOD OF 45 DAYS OCTOBER 4, 2017 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Urgency Ordinance No. 919 Page 3 of 3 E3—Pg 7 ORDINANCE NO. 919 AN INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENACTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF HOTELS OR THE EXPANSION OF EXISTING HOTELS, DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT A. Recitals. W The City is responsible for adopting and implementing land use regulations within its boundaries. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code ("Code') generally regulates the entitlement, establishment and operation of Hotels within the City. (ii) Hotels are facilities with guest rooms or suites, provided with or without kitchen facilities, rented to the general public for transient lodging. Hotels typically include a variety of services in addition to lodging, for example, restaurants, meeting facilities, swimming pools, tennis courts, indoor athletic facilities and personal services. (iiii) Hotels can become a convenient location for certain types of criminal activity. The manufacture of methamphetamine and other types of illegal drugs has occurred in Hotels, damaging property and endangering other Hotel guests. Hotels are also a convenient destination for prostitution and sex trafficking. (iv) Evidence from jurisdictions throughout the country demonstrates that Hotels often attract or are the source of criminal activity: 1. In 2014, a man was arrested at a Hotel in Braintree, MA after threatening an 18-year old girl because "she wasn't working" as a prostitute; 2. In 2015, the City of Dallas, TX filed suit against the owners of a Hotel' after more than 40 drug -related arrests, in addition to four prostitution busts and numerous other crimes took place there in the preceding years; 3. In 2014, three people were arrested for conspiracy and loitering with intent to commit prostitution outside of a Hotel in National City, CA; 4. "Meth labs" have been discovered in Hotels in places such as Springfield, MO, Rockdale County, FL, DeKalb County, GA, and Lone Tree, CO, among others. (v) The City has recently experienced an increase in calls for service from Hotels within the City. There are currently nine Hotels in the City that have generated a total of 1,214 calls for service In the last 20 months. (vi) Hotels are often used as semi -permanent housing solutions for individuals unable to afford permanent housing, which leads to the creation of unauthorized residential uses on commercial properties. Some Hotels have been knmm to actively market their units as an alternative to student housing for college and trade school students. Ordnance No. 919 —Pagel of 4 Attachment 1 E3—Pg 8 (vii) The proliferation of new Hotels throughout the City without due consideration through the approval of a conditional use permit presents an immediate threat to public health, safety or welfare. If new Hotels are established, or existing uses are expanded without appropriate review and regulation, it could lead to an increase in drug and prostitution -related crime. New or expanded Hotels could also have potential adverse secondary effects on neighborhoods and result in significant irreversible change to neighborhood and community character. (viii) There are currently no regulations in effect pertaining to security, traffic, safety or other impacts at Hotels or the services that these Hotels offer to guests, nor has the City undertaken a comprehensive analysis of the suitability of Hotels within the City's various zoning districts. (ix) The City intends to study the issues associated with Hotels in order to determine which locations are most appropriate for them, and what requirements, if any, should be imposed on their operation. After undertaking this study, the City intends to enact permanent regulations specific to Hotels. The City intends to undertake the required study within a reasonable time. In the interim, the City Council finds it necessary to enact a conditional use permit requirement for Hotels to prevent the establishment or expansion of Hotels that may conflict with the contemplated new policies or regulations or otherwise present impacts that would go unaddressed absent a conditional use permit process. (x) Absent the passage of this Interim Ordinance, continued approval of entitlements for Hotels without approval of conditional use permits poses a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety or general welfare. if this Interim Ordinance does not become effective immediately, but instead becomes effective thirty (30) days after a second reading, there is a risk that further harm will be done to prevent the orderly development of Hotels in the City. There is therefore an urgent necessity for the City to adopt a conditional use permit requirement for the establishment and expansion of Hotels to take effect immediately. This requirement is intended to provide the City with an opportunity to evaluate and modify its zoning provisions in order to promote the appropriate development of Hotels in the City. (xi) Due to the foregoing circumstances, the City Council finds and determines that the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare requires that this Interim Ordinance be enacted pursuant to Government Code sections 36934, 36937 and 65858, and that it take effect immediately upon adoption, and its urgency is hereby declared. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Legislative Findings. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct and, based on such facts and the entirety of the record before it, further finds as follows: a. The establishment and operation of any new Hotels or the expansion of any existing Hotel within the City without due consideration through the approval of a conditional use permit and before the City has a chance to study current impacts and potential regulation would result in adverse impacts, constitute a nuisance, and present a risk to the public health, safety, and welfare. Ordnance No. 919 — Page 2 of 4 E3—Pg 9 b. Requiring a conditional use permit for new or expanded Hotels in any zone or overlay in which Hotels are permitted is necessary to protect the public safety, health, and welfare. Section 2. Conditional Use Permit Requirement Established. The City Council hereby establishes an interim zoning ordinance imposing a conditional use permit requirement on new Hotels and expansions of existing Hotels in all zones of the City where Hotels are permitted. During the term of this Interim Ordinance, no Hotel shall be allowed, nor shall any entitlement or permit be issued for a Hotel, unless a conditional use permit is approved for the proposed use in accordance with the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. For purposes of this Interim Ordinance, the term "Hotel" shall mean a hotel, motel, or inn containing ten or more sleeping rooms, which is used for temporary occupancy of transients. The "establishment* of a Hotel includes both the development and operation of an entirely new structure for a Hotel, and the conversion of an existing apartment building, or other structure into a Hotel. The "expansion" of a Hotel includes any increase in the hours of operation, size of the building, or any other increase in the intensity of use of the Hotel. Section 3. Ordinance is Supplemental. This Interim Ordinance is additional to and supplemental to, and shall not affect, except as specifically provided herein, any provision of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, which shall be operative and remain in full force and effect without limitation. Section 4. Term. This Interim Ordinance shall take effect on October 4, 2017, and shall remain in effect for a period of 45 days from the date of publication in accordance with California Government Code Section 65858, and shall expire, and the prohibition established hereby shall terminate, forty-five (45) days after the date of adoption unless extended by the City Council pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858. Section 5. Immediate Effect. This Interim Ordinance is an urgency ordinance for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety within the meaning of Government Code sections 3934, 36937 and 65858, and therefore shall be passed immediately upon its introduction and shall become effective immediately upon its adoption, by a minimum four -fifths (415) vote of the City Council. Section 6. CEQA. The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of this Ordinance, and the zoning provisions established hereby, may have a significant effect on the environment, because the Ordinance will impose greater limitations on development in the City, and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. It is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations. Section 7. Penalty. Violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) or by imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every day such a violation exists shall constitute a separate and distinct violation of this Ordinance. Section 8. Civil Remedies. The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. Ordnance No. 919 — Page 3 of 4 E3—Pg 10 Section 9. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was passed by a 415 vote at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 4th day of October, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: Ordnance No. 919 — Page 4 of 4 E3—pg 11 STAFF REPORT DATE: November 15, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Candyce Burnett, City Planner Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 923, EXTENDING URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 919 FOR AN ADDITIONAL 10 MONTHS AND 15 DAYS, TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW HOTELS IN ALL ZONES. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Urgency Interim Zoning Ordinance No. 923 entitled "An Interim Zoning Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Extending Interim Ordinance No. 919 for an Additional 10 Months and 15 Days Requiring a Conditional Use Permit for the Establishment of New Hotels or the Expansion of Existing Hotels and Declaring the Urgency Thereof" by four -fifths vote by title only. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to State law, Government Code Section 65858, a city may enact an interim Zoning Ordinance on an urgency basis to protect the public safety, health, and welfare by prohibiting any use(s) that may be in conflict with a contemplated change to a city's General Plan, Specific Plan, zoning requirements, or any such change that a city is intending to study within a reasonable period of time. On October 4, 2017, the City Council approved Urgency Ordinance No. 919, requiring a Conditional Use Permit for the establishment of any new hotel or the expansion of any existing hotel within the City to allow staff time to study the issue and draft any necessary changes to the Municipal Code. Per State law, the interim ordinance is effective for a period of 45 days from the date ❑f adoption, unless extended prior to the end of the 45-day period. An urgency ordinance may be extended at a public hearing by a four -fifths vote of the Council. Staff is requesting additional time to study the issue and draft a code amendment to properly address the impacts created by hotel development within the City. ANALYSIS: Hotels are facilities with guest rooms or suites, provided with or without kitchen facilities, rented to the general public for transient lodging. Hotels typically inctude a variety of services in addition to lodging, for example, restaurants, meeting facilities, swimming pools, tennis courts, Indoor athletic facilities and personal services. There are currently no regulations in effect regarding the operational standards required for hotels (i.e. security, lighting, staffing and cooperation with law enforcement). EXHIBIT C Page 1 of 3 E3—Pg 12 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION TO EXTEND URGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT HOTELS IN ALL ZONES FOR 10 MONTHS AND 15 DAYS NOVEMBER 15, 2017 There are nine hotels within the City of Rancho Cucamonga with two more under construction. Most of these hotels have been built in the last 5-9 years; particularly in the last 3 years the City has seen a proliferation of requests for hotels in all categories, including business, extended stay and general categories. Hotels provide business travelers a convenient location near local businesses and Ontario International Airport as well as provide weekend travelers a great location to use as their base for exploring our local sites. Hotels employ hundreds of employees and provide a valuable contribution to our economy. Hotels can become a convenient location for certain types of criminal activity and have in many instances become associated with criminal activity in many cities throughout Southern California and the United States. The manufacture of methamphetamine and other types of illegal drugs has occurred in Hotels, damaging property and endangering other Hotel guests. Hotels, especially when used for extended stays, are also a convenient destination for prostitution and sex trafficking. Examples of this type of activity from other jurisdictions include: i. In 2014, a man was arrested at a hotel in Braintree, MA after threatening an 18-year old girls because "she wasn't working" as a prostitute. 2. In 2015 the City of Dallas, TX filed suit against the owners of a hotel after more than 40 drug -related arrests, in addition to four prostitution busts and numerous other crimes took place there in preceding years. 3. "Meth labs" have been discovered in hotels in places such as Springfield, MO, Rockdale County, FL, DeKalb County, GA and Lone Tree, CO, among others. In addition, hotels are often used as semi -permanent housing solutions for individuals unable to afford permanent housing, which leads to the creation of unauthorized residential uses on commercial properties in ways that were never intended and often are problematic. Some hotels have been known to actively market their units as an alternative to student housing for college and trade school students, again creating a more permanent type of unauthorized residential use on a commercial property, in a manner which is unsupported and may cause conflict with adjacent uses. The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department has recently noted an increase in calls for service from Hotels within the City. In the last 20 months' there have been over 1200 calls for service at all hotels within the City. While current hotel operators generally work well with the City in a cooperative manner to address these concerns, staff is concerned that without additional tools to regulate the siting and operation of hotels, the current call volume could increase significantly and the City may experience problems similar to what has happened in other jurisdictions. Because of the concerns noted above, Staff believes there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare presented by the establishment of new hotels and the expansion of existing hotels within the City without further regulation of hotel locations and operations. There are currently no regulations in effect regarding the operational standards required for hotels (i.e. security, lighting, staffing and cooperation with law enforcement). If new hotels are established or existing hotel uses are expanded without appropriate review and regulation, it could lead to an increase in drug and prostitution -related crime. New or expanded hotels could also have adverse secondary impacts on neighborhoods and result in significant irreversible change to neighborhood and community character. Page 2 of 3 E3—Pg 13 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION TO EXTEND URGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT HOTELS IN ALL ZONES FOR 10 MONTHS AND 15 DAYS NOVEMBER 15, 2017 FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enacting an interim urgency ordinance on hotels furthers the City Council's public safety goals by appropriately regulating and reviewing hotels to prevent criminal activity and create unauthorized residential uses on commercial properties_ ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Urgency Ordinance No. 923 Page 3 of 3 E3—Pg 14 ORDINANCE NO. 923 AN INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENACTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF HOTELS OR THE EXPANSION OF EXISTING HOTELS, DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF A. Recitals. 0) The City is responsible for adopting and implementing land use regulations within its boundaries. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code ("Code") generally regulates the entitlement, establishment and operation of Hotels within the City. (ii) Hotels are facilities with guest rooms or suites, provided with or without kitchen facilities, rented to the general public for transient lodging. Hotels typically include a variety of services in addition to lodging, for example, restaurants, meeting facilities, swimming pools, tennis courts, indoor athletic facilities and personal services. (iii) Hotels can become a convenient location for certain types of criminal activity. The manufacture of methamphetamine and other types of illegal drugs has occurred in Hotels, damaging property and endangering other Hotel guests. Hotels are also a convenient destination for prostitution and sex trafficking. (iv) Evidence from jurisdictions throughout the country demonstrates that Hotels often attract or are the source of criminal activity: 1. In 2014, a man was arrested at a Hotel in Braintree, MA after threatening an 18-year old girl because "she wasn't working" as a prostitute; 2. In 2015, the City of Dallas, TX filed suit against the owners of a Hotel after more than 40 drug -related arrests, in addition to four prostitution busts and numerous other crimes took place there in the preceding years; 3. In 2014, three people were arrested for conspiracy and loitering with intent to commit prostitution outside of a Hotel in National City, CA; 4. "Meth labs" have been discovered in Hotels in places such as Springfield, MO, Rockdale County, FL, DeKalb County, GA, and Lone Tree, CO, among others. (v) The City has recently experienced an increase in calls for service from Hotels within the City. There are currently nine Hotels in the City that have generated a total of 1,214 calls for service in the last 20 months. (vi) Hotels are often used as semi -permanent housing solutions for individuals unable to afford permanent housing, which leads to the creation of unauthorized residential uses on commercial properties. Some Hotels have been known to actively market their units as an alternative to student housing for college and trade school students. (vii) The proliferation of new Hotels throughout the City without due consideration through the approval of a conditional use permit presents an immediate threat to public health, Ordnance No. 923 — Page 1 of 4 Attachment 1 E3—Pg 15 safety or welfare. If new Hotels are established, or existing uses are expanded without appropriate review and regulation, it could lead to an increase in drug and prostitution -related crime. New or expanded Hotels could also have potential adverse secondary effects on neighborhoods and result in significant irreversible change to neighborhood and community character. (viii) There are currently no regulations in effect pertaining to security, traffic, safety or other impacts at Hotels or the services that these Hotels offer to guests, nor has the City undertaken a comprehensive analysis of the suitability of Hotels within the City's various zoning districts. (ix) The City intends to study the issues associated with Hotels in order to determine which locations are most appropriate for them, and what requirements, if any, should be imposed on their operation. After undertaking this study, the City intends to enact permanent regulations specific to Hotels. The City intends to undertake the required study within a reasonable time. In the interim, the City Council finds it necessary to enact a conditional use permit requirement for Hotels to prevent the establishment or expansion of Hotels that may conflict with the contemplated new policies or regulations or otherwise present impacts that would go unaddressed absent a conditional use permit process. (x) Absent of the passage of this Interim Ordinance, continued approval of entitlements for Hotels without approval of conditional use permits poses a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety or general welfare. If this Interim Ordinance does not become effective immediately, but instead becomes effective thirty (30) days after a second reading, there is a risk that further harm will be done to prevent the orderly development of Hotels In the City. There is therefore an urgent necessity for the City to adopt a conditional use permit requirement for the establishment and expansion of Hotels to take effect immediately. This requirement is intended to provide the City with an opportunity to evaluate and modify its zoning provisions in order to promote the appropriate development of Hotels in the City. (xi) Due to the foregoing circumstances, the City Council finds and determines that the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare requires that this Interim Ordinance be enacted pursuant to Government Code sections 36934, 36937 and 65858, and that it take effect immediately upon adoption, and its urgency is hereby declared. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby ordains as follows; Section 1. Legislative Findings. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct and, based on such facts and the entirety of the record before it, further finds as follows: a. The establishment and operation of any new Hotels or the expansion of any existing Hotel within the City without due consideration through the approval of a conditional use permit and before the City has a chance to study current impacts and potential regulation would result in adverse impacts, constitute a nuisance, and present a risk to the public health, safety, and welfare, b. Requiring a conditional use permit for new or expanded Hotels in any zone or overlay in which Hotels are permitted is newessary to protect the public safety, heL,'n, and welfare. Ordnance No. 923 — Page 2 of 4 E3—Pg 16 Section 2. Conditional Use Permit Requirement Established. The City Council hereby establishes an interim zoning ordinance imposing a conditional use permit requirement on new Hotels and expansions of existing Hotels in all zones of the City where Hotels are permitted. During the term of this Interim Ordinance, no Hotel shall be allowed, nor shall any entitlement or permit be issued for a Hotel, unless a conditional use permit is approved for the proposed use in accordance with the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. For purposes of this Interim Ordinance, the term "Hotel" shall mean a hotel, motel, or inn containing ten or more sleeping rooms, which is used for temporary occupancy of transients. The "establishment" of a Hotel includes both the development and operation of an entirely new structure for a Hotel, and the conversion of an existing apartment building, or other structure into a Hotel. The "expansion" of a Hotel includes any increase in the hours of operation, size of the building, or any other increase in the intensity of use of the Hotel. Section 3. Ordinance is Supplemental. This interim Ordinance is additional to and supplemental to, and shall not affect, except as specifically provided herein, any provision of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, which shall be operative and remain in full force and effect without limitation. Section 4. Term. This Interim Ordinance shall take effect concurrent with the expiration of Urgency Ordinance No. 919 at midnight on November 18, 2017, and shall remain in effect for a period of ten (10) months, fifteen (15) days from the date of publication in accordance with California Government Code Section 65858. Section 5. CEQA. The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of this Ordinance, and the zoning provisions established hereby, may have a significant effect on the environment, because the Ordinance will impose greater limitations on development in the City, and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. It is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations. Section 6. Penalty. Violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) or by imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every day such a violation exists shall constitute a separate and distinct violation of this Ordinance. Section 7. Civil Remedies. The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. Section B. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Ordnance No. 923 — Page 3 of 4 E3—Pg 17 ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was passed by a 4/5 vote at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 15th day of November 2017, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: Ordnance No. 923 — Page 4 of 4 E3—Pg 18 STAFF REPORT DATE: December 13, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner 9 INITIATED BY: Dominick Perez, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19823 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC -A proposal to subdivide one (1) existing parcel into three (3) parcels in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings on a 13.96-acre site within the Industrial Park (IP) District located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue—APN: 0210-081-43 (formerly APN: 0210-081-19 and a portion of APN: 0210-081-20). Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016- 00826, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00402 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC -A proposal to construct an industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District —APN: 0210-081-43 (formerly APN: 0210-081-19 and a portion of APN: 0210-081-20). Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017- 00408, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2017-00404 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to establish a Uniform Sign Program related to a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District —APN: 0210-081- 43 (formerly APN: 0210-081-19 and a portion of APN: 0210-081-20). Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F1—F6 Pg 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19823, DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406 and DRC2017-00408 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2017-00405 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to remove existing trees in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District —APN: 0210-081-43 (formerly APN: 0210-081-19 and a portion of APN: 0210-081-20) . Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017- 00406 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to reduce the required setback for average depth of landscape along Fourth Street and Utica Avenue by a maximum of ten (10%) percent in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District — APN: 0210-081-43 (formerly APN: 0210-081-19 and a portion of APN: 0210-081-20) . Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017- 00408 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to increase the height of the screen wall along Trademark North Parkway by a maximum of 2 feet in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District —APN: 0210-081-43 (formerly APN: 0210-081-19 and a portion of APN: 0210-081-20) . Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F1—F6 Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19823, DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406 and DRC2017-00408 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: • Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project; and Approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404, Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406 and Minor Exception DRC2017-00408 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Site Characteristics: The project site is located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue and is comprised of one (1) parcel with a combined area of 13.96 acres and is currently undeveloped. The parcel is surrounded to the north, south and east by partial right-of-way improvements, including 4th Street, Utica Avenue, Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Undeveloped Vineyard Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District North Multi -tenant Office Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) Developments District Ontario Center Urban Residential District South Vintage Apartments (City of Ontario) (Ontario Center Specific Plan — City of Ontario East Vacant/Abandoned Mixed Use Planning Area 5 (Empire Parking Lot Lakes Specific Plan) Industrial Park (IP) West Undeveloped Vineyard Industrial Park District and Haven Avenue Overlay District PROJECT BACKGROUND: A Pre -Application Review (DRC2016-00826) workshop was held on December 14, 2016, to discuss the project with the Planning Commission. The applicant desired feedback from the Commission before formally submitting the multiple necessary applications and technical studies. The outcome of the workshop was generally favorable. The Commission was supportive of the proposed architecture and site layout. No major issues or concerns were presented. The staff report and meeting minutes for this workshop are attached as Exhibit R. ANALYSIS: A. Project Density: Floor Area Ratio — 48.2 percent (0.482) F1—F6 Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19823, DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406 and DRC2017-00408 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 4 B. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the subject property, which currently consists of one (1) parcel, into three (3) new parcels. Parcel 1 is located adjacent to Utica Avenue and 4th Street, Parcel 2 is located adjacent to Utica Avenue and Bentley Street and Parcel 3 is located at the northernmost point of the site, adjacent to Trademark Parkway North. Parcels 1 and 2 are generally rectangular in shape, whereas the shape of Parcel 3 follows the curved alignment of Trademark Parkway North. The following table lists each of the areas of each of the proposed parcels. Parcel Area Acres Parcel 1 6.02 Parcel 6.07 Parcel 3 1.87 Total Area 13.96 Per Section 17.36.040 of the Development Code, the minimum lot areas for parcels within the Industrial Park (1) District is 0.50 acre. Based on the proposed parcel sizes shown above, the project will be in compliance with this requirement. C. Design Review DRC2017-00402: The applicant proposes to develop the entire 13.96-acre site. This includes the construction of three (3) industrial logistics buildings, parking, landscaping and remaining street improvements along the southern, eastern and northern perimeter of the site. According to the site plan, the three parcels will each contain one of the proposed buildings. Each building will contain office area and warehouse area. The square footage breakdown of each building is shown in the table below: Office S uare Feet Warehouse (Square Feet Overall Building Floor Area S uare Feet Building 1 11,000 106,500 117,500 Building 2 7,000 137,395 144,395 Building 3 4,000 27,388 31,388 Project Total 22,000 271,283 293,283 Each building will be constructed of concrete tilt up panel walls that incorporate decorative reveal lines as the primary building material, with a combination of glass, metal awnings, columns and decorative texturing as the secondary building materials. The maximum building height for the project is 36 feet and the proposed floor area ratio (FAR) is 48.2 percent. Building 1 has a setback of 92 feet — 7 inches from 41h Street and 68 feet from Utica Avenue. Building 2 has a setback of 65 feet — 8 inches from Utica Avenue and 25 feet —11 inches from Bentley Street. Building 3 has a setback of 31 feet —10 inches from Trademark Parkway North. F1—F6 Pg4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19823, DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406 and DRC2017-00408 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 5 Per Section 17.64 of the Development Code, the parking requirement is as follows: Number of Number of Parking Building Building Building Spaces Spaces Ratio 1 2 3 Required Provided Office 1/250 44 28 16 88 1st 20,000 @ 1/1,000 20 20 20 60 2"d 20,000 Warehouse @ 10 10 4 24 1/2,000 Above 40,000 @ 0 1/4,000 17 25 42 Total 91 83 40 214 216 The site contains a total of 216 parking spaces that are equally distributed throughout the entire site. Also throughout the parking lots are ground and wall mounted lights. According to the Photometric Plan that was submitted, the proposed lighting will meet the illumination requirements. There is a total of thirty (30) trailer parking spaces located adjacent to the dock door areas within each parcel. The site has a total of six vehicular driveway access points: two along Bentley Avenue, two along Utica Avenue and two along 4th Street. The northwesterly and southwesterly driveways are designed to be shared entrances to allow access to the properties to the west of the subject site. Each building will contain between three (3) and fourteen (14) dock doors, with an overall total of thirty (30) dock doors throughout the project. Buildings 1 (12 doors) and 2 (14 doors) are designed with the dock doors to be centrally located and screened from 4th Street and Utica Avenue as shown on the site plan. There are 8-foot tall metal manual operated gates at the east and west ends of this dock area, which will screen the trailer parking from the properties to the east and west. Building 3 contains a total of three (3) dock doors and is shown to include a concrete tilt -up screen wall with an 8-foot tall swing gate around the dock area. Each parcel contains exactly one trailer parking space per dock door, which is consistent with the Development Code trailer parking requirements. The overall average landscape coverage for the project is 15.04 percent. Also, the water budget established for the project is in compliance with the requirements specified within the water efficient landscaping section (17.82) of the Development Code. The landscape plan indicates there will be trees around the project perimeter and throughout the parking lot, including 15-gallon Brisbane box trees, an evergreen species, along the west end of the site. This will help screen potential industrial uses at this site from future development to the west. F1—F6 Pg5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19823, DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406 and DRC2017-00408 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 6 The site currently contains partial street improvements around the south, east and north perimeter, including improvements from the street centerline to the curb face. This project will involve the completion of the right-of-way improvements, which include the installation of the sidewalk along 4th Street, Utica Avenue, Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North. Also, there are above ground utility lines along the southern edge of the property, on the north side of 4th Street. Multiple poles will need to be relocated due to the proposed right turn lanes for the drive approaches along 4th Street. Lastly, the site plan shows a proposed bus stop along 4th Street. The bus stop detail provided in the full-sized plans indicates the design of the bus shelter will be architecturally compatible to the proposed buildings onsite. Overall, the project complies with all Development Code requirements, except for landscape setback along 4th Street and maximum wall height along Trademark North Parkway, which are discussed in further detail below. D. Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404: The applicant proposes to establish a Uniform Sign Program (USP) for the industrial complex. Per Section 17.122.060, a USP is required for industrial complexes with multiple buildings. This is to create a coordinated project theme of uniform design elements, such as color, lettering style, and placement. The proposed USP includes signage criteria for one (1) project identification monument, three (3) tenant identification monuments, tenant building signs as well as addressing and suite entry graphics. The monument signs, which are located along 4th Street, Utica Avenue and Trademark Parkway North, are designed to be compatible with the proposed architecture and will incorporate a concrete base and aluminum elements and lettering. The tenant building signs have been designed to allow for one or two rows of text and a logo for each tenant to be located adjacent to their office area. Tenant building signs are also required to be 3-inch deep fabricated reverse pan channel aluminum letters and/or logo pin mounted to the wall with 1-1/2-inch deep stand-offs painted to match building color. E. Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405: The applicant proposes to remove a total of fifteen (15) Aleppo Pine and Red Ironbark trees along the northern perimeter of the site, adjacent to Trademark Parkway North. The trees currently conflict with the proposed onsite and street improvements. According to an arborist report that was prepared by Evergreen Arborist Consultants on April 25, 2017, a total of eleven (11) trees were determined to be heritage trees. Per the City's Development Code, a heritage tree is defined as a tree that exceeds 30 feet in height and 20 inches in diameter at breast height. The Development Code also requires a Tree Removal Permit to be obtained prior to the removal of a heritage tree. The project involves the installation of landscaping throughout the parking lot and perimeter of the site, including the planting of 23815-gallon and 24-inch box trees. This is consistent with the Development Code tree replacement policy, which requires one tree to be planted for every heritage tree removed. Furthermore, the proposed trees along Trademark Parkway North will assist in providing adequate screening for the trailer parking area adjacent to Building 3. F. Minor Exception DRC2017-00406: The applicant proposes to reduce the required setback for average depth of landscape along 4th Street by 10 percent (Exhibit N). The required F1—F6 Pg6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19823, DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406 and DRC2017-00408 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 7 average landscape depth is 45 feet. However, the proposed average landscape depth is 40 feet — 6 inches. Per the tabulation section of the site plan, the project is in compliance with the required average depth of landscaping along Utica Avenue, Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North, as required by Table 17.36.040-2. However, because of the installation of the two right turn lanes along 4th Street, the required average depth of landscaping is deficient by 4 feet — 6 inches. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings for Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, which are required by the City's Development Code: 1. Fact: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. Finding: The reduction in the required average depth of landscaping will permit the project site to be developed at the maximum density permitted by General Plan. 2. Fact: The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Finding: The proposed industrial development is of similar design and density to other industrial warehouse developments in the vicinity including the existing warehouse located at the southwest corner of 6tt' Street and Utica Avenue approximately 700 feet to the north of the project site. 3. Fact: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Finding: The reduction in required average depth of landscaping is necessary due to the location of the curb face along the right turn lanes along 4th Street. If the Applicant was not required to construct the Improvements, the Applicant would be capable of complying with the average depth of landscape of forty-five feet (45') along 4th Street. The exception will allow for the development of the project site at the permitted density. 4. Fact: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. Finding: The proposed reduction in the required building setback is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to reduce the required setback by up to 10 percent where it has been demonstrated that there are unusual circumstances. In this case, the proposed Minor Exception is only requested by the Applicant to allow for the Applicant to comply with the required average depth of landscape along the 4th & Utica project's 4th Street frontage. The inability to comply with this setback requirement was solely caused by the City of Rancho Cucamonga's requirement to construct the improvements. F1—F6 Pg7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19823, DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406 and DRC2017-00408 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 8 G. Minor Exception DRC2017-00408: The applicant also proposes to increase the height of the screen wall along Trademark North Parkway by 2 feet (Exhibit O). Because of the placement of the building, dock doors and parking area at the north end of Parcel 3, the screen wall was placed within the setback area. Per Table 17.36.040-2, street frontage walls are required to have a maximum height of 3 feet. However, since the intent is to screen the dock area from public view, the applicant is requesting to construct a 5-foot tall screen wall, as seen from the public right-of-way. Also, as shown on the section drawings of the site plan, a landscape berm will be installed adjacent to the wall, which will further assist in the screening of this area. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings for Minor Exception DRC2017-00408, which are required by the City's Development Code: 1. Fact: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. Finding: The increase in the maximum permitted wall height is consistent with the Industrial Park land use designation of the project site. The increase in wall height will permit the project to provide 5-foot-high screen walls as measured on the street side of the wall. 2. Fact: The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Finding: The proposed industrial warehouse development is compatible with the surrounding industrial warehouse developments, which also have screen walls around the site perimeter for screening the outdoor truck storage. 3. Fact: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Finding: The northernmost building is bound to the north by Trademark Parkway North ("Building 3"). The curvilinear shape of the existing Trademark Parkway North created an irregular shaped site upon which the proposed Building 3 is to be constructed. As a result, there are abnormal constraints upon the ingress/egress of the Building 3 truck court. The increase in the allowable wall height will allow screen walls to be constructed along the northern perimeter of the site that will screen the vehicle storage areas from the public street to the north, thereby achieving desirable site planning for the proposed land use. 4. Fact: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. Finding: The proposed increase in the maximum permitted wall height within the front setback area from 3 feet to 5 feet is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to increase the permitted wall height by up to 2 feet F1—F6 Pg8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19823, DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406 and DRC2017-00408 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 9 where it has been demonstrated that there are unusual circumstances. In this case, because of the irregular shape of the site and the grade change from north to south, additional height to allow for adequate screening will not negatively impact the public health and will most likely enhance the aesthetics of the project. H. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant hosted a neighborhood meeting on August 29, 2017, at the Ontario Center School (835 N. Center Avenue). The applicant provided an overview of the project and fielded questions from 1 business owner in attendance. The questions were related to street improvements, truck screening and truck traffic. The applicant responded to these questions by stating the following: • The project would require the installation of sidewalks along all four (4) streets (4th Street, Utica Avenue, Bentley Street, and Trademark Parkway) which comprise the project's frontage. • The project will incorporate concrete screen walls to screen trucks located within the truck court from public view. • The majority of the truck traffic will occur on Utica Avenue and not on Trademark Parkway. Additionally, the Applicant will be required to install stop signs at the intersection of Trademark Parkway and Winston Road to allow both cars and trucks to safely navigate the intersection. The attendee was generally satisfied with the response given at the meeting and followed up with an email thanking the applicant for the presentation as it resolved his concerns (Exhibit T). Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Wimberly, Oaxaca, Granger) on September 19, 2017 (Exhibit S). No major issues were identified and the Design Review Committee recommended the project proceed to the Planning Commission for approval. Technical Review Committee: The project was reviewed and approved by the Technical Review Committee on September 19, 2017. Conditions of Approval are included in the Resolution and attached Conditions of Approval. K. AB52 Tribal Consultation: In accordance with AB52, the Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation were contacted on August 2, 2017, to determine interest in engaging in consultation related to the potential impact to cultural resources as a result of the project. On August 29, 2017, the City was contacted by the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) with comments regarding the project. Staff incorporated the comments into the mitigation measures, which are provided in Exhibit U. L. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Biological F1—F6 Pg9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19823, DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406 and DRC2017-00408 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 10 Resources, Cultural Resources, Noise, Transportation/Traffic and Tribal Cultural Resources, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. Per the Fiscal Revenues Analysis that was prepared for this project by DPFG (Development Planning and Financing Group, Inc) on May 4, 2017, a percentage of this annual tax estimated at $14,016 will be shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees estimated at $1,569,493. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, and police. It should also be noted that the City's Development Impact Fees are planned to increase in March and July of 2018 and will continue to periodically increase annually. The project will also create temporary jobs during the construction of the site and permanent jobs during the operation of the site. The number of permanent jobs that the project will generate in unknown at this time as the tenant has not yet been determined. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: MID AND LONG-RANGE PLANNING One of the City's Council goals is to revitalize underutilized areas and enhance industrial land uses. The proposed industrial building will in -fill a vacant, underutilized site and enhance the existing industrial area located north and east of the site. Approval of the proposed building will permit the area to develop with general industrial uses as specified in the General Plan and Development Code. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660- foot radius of the project site. To date, no comments have been received regarding the project notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Exhibit B - Site Utilization Map Exhibit C - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit D - Conceptual Grading Plan F1—F6 Pg10 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19823, DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406 and DRC2017-00408 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 11 Exhibit E - Water Quality Management Plan Exhibit F - Site Plan Exhibit G - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit H - Elevations Exhibit I - Floor Plan Exhibit J - Roof Plan Exhibit K - Photometric Plan Exhibit L - Bus Shelter Design Exhibit M - Uniform Sign Program Exhibit N - Minor Exception DRC2017-00406 Exhibit Exhibit O - Minor Exception DRC2017-00408 Exhibit Exhibit P - Tree Location Exhibit Exhibit Q - Overhead Utility Exhibit Exhibit R - Planning Commission Workshop Staff Report (DRC2016-00826) with Minutes Exhibit S - Design Review Committee Comments Exhibit T - Neighborhood Meeting Summary Exhibit U - Initial Study Parts I, II and III Exhibit V - Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2017-00402 Draft Resolution of Approval for Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2017-00406 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2017-00408 CB:DP/Is F146 Pg11 Aerial Photo for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT19823 & Design Review DRC2017-00402 DDn1Gf T -. .rws. wr .. •:•' Bali!_ d, EXHIBIT A F1—F6Pg12 Al °1 pq; ZO S9E!i 3 a f d 4 aria! s;.. iise 1 1 a i !3 a iq °SypE a gg ap p° w°!q3'¢ be .'7 i4IN 2 CJ t �_ ¢ � 3 P°°i � a1x � (B�3¢, i,! 5` ! S w v ?• !: !� !� i AE°i t $ 3_ � • `E t S � 4 E 2, �7 RS ° a k' ! � -i 'i 1° a y� aQi¢gg�g°2 i°e is i' } a e •IIx epj$a- 5��� 4i � � � � $�� 3 g ! '�Qe:aE'e yv�a ! pla S g i21e! Sx=e i€ iEls �! 9r 9° it� II111 y 5 i @$ai4i a'w v�! 1e a"si t �°i i €s1 11 H 1. �5 P Ikt �e p3$ 4 v W , g ° � y U loR, I T i O ry e •° IP_� i � z� �y 4 1 i k3 Cn 3 = ¢ fill ¢ a lit! a v31 � � ;ah s¢;P :=5111 y EXHIBIT B F1—F6Pg13 A ' 8 A A � - e PY,I �$0 ggip ° ,o I � t; J III I OI y EXHIBIT Cy �g AS�kY 'a980698fi e'9� yy i��bennYlCg^gRR 4ea� yyyp wyyy7�y Ycbbsne-ba�;,'� esu�:i.�•••g:w 3�00hhh0�90 000 P�seg$4'a�,sAse y:hasse os°�___ b �, •III„a Q6: $� _.. I. zg mill Irk PIP 1111p, wo �S69A3 g kk& '�7gp��Ag�g A`gq'9bPp ��A �4 I LLLL L A is _A�s-I A:sa §I I;.i as f 0 x.a" J I10 xp . -y U§ II J Ap 1 �3ca Su S ��� I P F �o vvOoE II 'i'I I LLl �� v II �5r 6 � �8 aq[�{.A �• � '^5�� / ' � I I I � � � II � III � � S i Z � Q ac?13ce cuc5wc ee cc��"d "3c c� g �jf€ J "a� � � p �� °°e�'�°T�Oi �y ��"l•`s.;I�Aa;i•,3 '.�P � :O A S A pp A p A WLUp3 n5 3Pg 2q' 5 I g lI•wl F III oil tl tl Q W� w a Ao �3m b aid; Z > L G V 9 as pp p ppppppp LU b" A C _ � I s w �h as b � jII A mms s3 :�xwnm v + Lu fig qy 3 �P� y91 13� Z4� s.t� n u Zy 9 d ji §��pq � @@yb$jb�b hbb '3W3yy �*y9y9 b I � � a qq g� g p�pA�dY��8Si5H��E;�3d�$� �' Q@� �� ft i�� �� ✓8'¢ _ s.c 9q�� w.ab�e�yb4j�ebE¢y,q€aS�FR_ EXHIBIT ® F1-F6Pg15 Fl-F6Pgl6 F1—F6 Pg17 . . . z /_ . )§ \(|. § I § , § I � $ t I | 1 - ! ` �\{ A. %® � � � ' I ! j. 1e r ! - i | § 1 1 \ � ) ® | ~ « « 7 7 < .$� i . e—R & 18 ll➢S L A s /s5K IZ ' 1 e 10 a � —� iQ N \d \ 9 Wjig !� Ve Lp —1 NQ _ ( I „x r as M ® a it Q a'3 j I i a.aaais H uanod F1-F6 Pg19 \¢\ � .- . m F,-FB Pg2, EXHIBIT F N. ) ) \ + [\ /\ fill€ §$§R §/m]/GEC$( e-5 R£ Z7� m i ON C) 1 U Fl -F6 Pg23 EXHIBIT H F1-F6 Pg24 �J R Af 0 co a V_ " a ++ z 0 a O © O U © U o Oo Oo o O o Oo 00 ���n��i �n�ilrs®I Is�L. ��i��iii�iivrlflli:•—I KEYNOTES ELEVATIONS OG..................- O. p ...per . ,. � �...� -•, `" GENERAL NOTES -ELEVATIONS COLOR SCHED. - ELEVATIONS paw .. . ,., _-- __________wu po» 1- A-L .......,___ O� GLAZING LEGEND PAINT ANn MATFFIAL IFG ND �'�'� 0 0 A) ] Q ■ Owner. I PLUGI5716 �TIGI,UA: ali.fl6K�o ■ Pmjm: IM1 k Uuo ■ (imsulvnn fuWSUM liwl.am ■ mv.x..a mh 1-A3.1 North Elevation ,<h Elevation No.#16263.00 CONCEPTUAL COLORED ELEVATION -BUILDING 2 05. T_ I T Cl M La N V I O O O O O O p p 0o mo o Oo Oo Oo Oo o Oo Oo 0 �I =1lI''Ililflll'IIII"""Ilfllf "IIIIIii I'II!Ili�®I! ee� ns fl"Illllllllll' ee� ® Ien ee� Ill1III M. O © O O O O see®o 00 o Oom12mism0 Oo ac=aamsi�i�"'�..•—tea-� n�ee��n�iii�ii�ii�i� I®1 lilhilll"Illhll!!!ll®Ifllllll'-'-llllpflll�llll=ll 0'=__�__�AST ELEYAMNI ICI 0 KEYNOTES -ELEVATIONS O^A GENERAL NOTES - ELEVATIONS COLOR SCHEID. - ELEVATIONS p .mot t -w owl GLAZING LEGEND G] . u —,_ PAINT AND MATE_MAL LEGEND 0 0 G ( Q U LMIMS UCLA, uc u..gsl�utp m Proj¢c 4th&Um �olu.,or.0 Gms• Nts: elvu n...c. rwww Reu�rn�i tuwsw[ tu.unzw. T. o. ovtm> 2-A3.1 North HPA No.#16263.00 CONCEPTUAL COLORED ELEVATION -BUILDING 3 05, ME I. —E 11 I ma ■I■°-��--�lT.---____- II I (to 00 b - Sg1IN REVATg1 /l IME!3T EYATON o - FAST- gT—oD OM APfI-D FAST va . r KEYNOTES - ELEVATIONS Ox .nn vm. r,m nw navum GENERAL NOTES -ELEVATIONS ■ -tea Caner. CPLUGno UTIG,IJ.0 m Y vuw-n re e[,wm-w w m[ 5¢ae wu,. �,e+V. bxGru^ W eNry R:xw �xryry uurp COLOR SCHED. - ELEVATIONS •a �z wine III, -M. _-- Jdt & Uua O was © ■ GLAZING LEGEND Cunsdcmrs: 111L tw..Ee swiuw PAINT AND MATERIAL LEGEND NME Hwu-larvew msxnE ■ 3-Al I 0 Yeg k nffi a V dog �$e WR6 a6� E �ti 6 Y i Y a v s peg y" ggz U4 ��@�yt R yge9e y e dY 4 w s!NJ ;!e�g� e ggg a g § py 1 a Y3aiyy9w 3� €�g$ge�l z "•�33Yia9_.�Y b 55 �1 Nll§ �Cg] zF�AE2s@9.e3,ag3y S?a?3=3�a $:3245'a9. F1—F6 Pg30 -n M 01 -U L W S KETNOTES - FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES•FLOOR PLAN 0- 0 O a ME pp{ as ■` n a 3 v s F-5 ! FR �a 3 Y Y Y Q Q Q j f o i i i j I j I, i i i i I I i I I I I I i I I I I Uq --7-- .I i I I i ------ 1------ StldDON]00C i E,TJ --. Eo FQ EO z 4 I W I `------ I I I I F- E- b b b F1-F6 Pg32 _ p35 �e yg dd6 g a3E al i 18 V a 101 Fl-F6 Pg33 [OYntlnf�tlflOwEx mxx ELEVATION Ma I II I I I I I I _I _1 _I WrtMRTtlSYEEi5 Wf HM]II6.1PEW3➢MM m, R Oancc CPIOGBTICSLTICA,IlC u emsz.m �anmmncm r�r. 4[h&lion ruexooYcuwwrau .�„� �,,..... Con •anu: aiorawi ovma�—AooF�na� MaunEO Eauwwetn sc�w.o Lmcue � msra�motrt:Fct�au� v�. A 2-A4,1 T_ T w�� Ul ® , ® —®� —� — _ I I _ g — — C S 3 C rouVRxr ow x ELEVATION QVEPALL PJCGftN� (1 tlpINm MO1N.�EOIA�AB��9C�FF}AJp�N- /1 GNpICf MRSEEi6Mis4'[116I. WA[EOPWI Mn W Mf�n1)0 uW:p�ameae nry 1 OIMCf CPLOGISf16 LTIC:I, LIC +eMwm w: ryM xwrn Projece 4th & Uun euixwv .�nrr� ^� Cnn•enm.. uwawx Pwuarv� OFCIxF/t rdrm> i'. ttRSLCltr$ONTS _ %1 `J 3-A4.1 Ila j k Asa g!a@y?p ggi Ila'yp€yg3�¢¢ w 5 p 9Rdls yit z J F- h psi g r CO I it 0 K r LL y It 1 y It 1 3g � lggi W Q W Q N 3 0 i N 3 F F •' P ee I sl�p¢ 3P aaa i l'I}j� 7 3 m }tis d z aiefeI fly ,il j:i ca if ii �9) Jqi it °, I, :1 ``rr rr rr iI, u 1� BUILDING 3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS t! BUILDING 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS I I SR: I LI-- LIGHT POLE DETAIL SL2 P _ I, 0 il EXHIBIT L F1-F6 Pg38 (D E 0 - O y u f n o I N N N J m o w s w O QJ f E C N p f N cc� O — 9 Z Q 0 C C p N V V V U P 0 V V V O U N N N N N VI N N U +-A o o s :DE. — �� N V O I N J V C Q O U O' LZ d Q N d l0 4 N O O 'VJ V 0 ai T z`;W:L w in EXHIBIT M F1-F6Pg39 Purpose & [Anent These a,ena hake born established for the pteppse of marntaldng sgsuge mnnnWry of III and aedhadls of" 49, B Udw miter for th,mutud Gnehl d aapwnen wta ants antler cpmptyienth the regulanpnsdthe.CMdRamhal Cucamongat'cityl. Tile sign "LINet o u Mn offer opnmtrcn camedteaunt sterit y whorl designated in mrdomurce with the, devgn sbMard, Codanwymwgl beirridlymsor<estattdanytrdadled non<onfmtNngwunappos wiser s MITI beremvxdat.,'I eaPande. All plwisims dose ClrydRamM Cucamonga Will CoderegW.'ann shall beapplicablo in adiddlontothese sign mteda. Wren thevemtana and me Ciry Mlnicipd CotlereaWrtmemsare WM in tthctehemo#resmcurepowdomol EIIIPISIId bpdpjAlCehP. Nosign shall be ohlalted sMhaut the mh&Ubw owners assedatiotis lhemnarer lefaredb as'A4Mtimthil ReNiew Control m approvalaM the titillated plycesmits. All Oppenml applWtiensshdi besubmith d tar the tlrywnh wrlXmcrosenthwn the Pmbary Rune, or Pro" Menage, The Ardbksbral Review Carolinian reserves the right to d sange or al this 99A create at any sere. .. • a • • 77ieDesignFactor General Sign Regulations All ownemerwtn vgnage h subject No the ArMix heal fleukw Cotnmilsee's wdkn appease. The Archide neal eve, iew Commtnee, at theewk d!,csA n, And at are ownefvfiesios asperse, has me ashin" M mnen, replace, arremove Any Sign that Is imo01M wnhobl wmten approval andbr by, sign that Is Alit in compliance with ON, MW Sign Program erlaras perry, subminal o, sign fai dwrmsovmW.rilot shall sudnn To Me Amhheaurd Renews ComlWdee, th.01 azure ddetallel shop drawmgsin fulI[clot. Suhmidds shall lndude the fnllesho, STOREFIe.TNTEI&ATION Soled baseball dmvaw orthum's Ideational detecting the g,ceett sign drag, and dl the choeril as the, elate the bo,e s,asol smrefion. SHOPORAWINGS Fully dlmessell and scared shop dmsvings slsailling III dlmennws. ropy layout type ay sot metehal, mI., mmm of attedymrot and It barterdetailsd construction, If shopdtawhgf artrdmiM, OwanlithLflt must seagblnit re banal bland said Arthhembe W. CamnmNe's appnsval is abWned. Alelgns must be apbtvxd by ma Cry of Raider Cusmonga harming Ce sartment evitn brad daapervd wbinlded roans Adhdatturd Resew Commmee past W arMring of IIan All signs and bleb Innall atabso N11 comply with 01 lmal bulldMg codes, and must cancan bMn 9gn Criteria. FINANCIAL KVeCN%BNTv i9thavalttitMant III widenslb!e IN, all babel orldtedtd!he sygnpP(afhPr]pa[a, mclWu+gbut Mt lmlled M, D.,,I,mwU,t teas lil apolwblej I00 dfrtt oumypfdm Ban nobfappllwblelismmlmpwsdmgmstsmdapp!ka tab s Ito . of cob Mvgn Wooden a lnsbllatlon Ind Wing ewes of shop drawings and patlems. MdntenamedaR vgnsm,ikemW condibm. A costs MatedtonNre hiIty Ira!ned repays aMdamage tothebu!Idirg. All stuncmherten sear n Nay erseral Uwiththe unaI ty and Sbte mto ties and "I rd W lull Waakman s Conpen astral one Gelled LublRry msurmue aNhcatb ro the Mhitectuml Renav Cgnmtttee mar m!nswRatlon O., l.1114 bdI dummrbacbrwill not ben ins, rommmenre insbliallondtheeAkrbr ilgn udev all d me bl lowing cuM,bns ra+e been me[ SUWhymnan nl AStooped or,,,n0d setp19na! drard s4aec tIo, I A,M, ,WW Faso. Comm,ee, and Gry's approval to be kept on fie in the Atchkatumt Perm CmmnitI offs, Submsslon nl the sun aellse tm's CM nfo ate d kmrrmm naming the macegemmt ,ompvy, as an addbol inwred mr"fire stork All necessary pernit, Names and approvals hm2 been Issued! by the CMd fando, Cucamonga, olclM'ing, bN not Ilonred Is, III permlt bustling pemilt and mnbxbrd boseress lkense The Ardialmnad INNII Cgmmmee must be notified 40 roan in advanced the patgoted ogn ers alum,, Iftheowneoymm tchoosesto cNMeme,entaimsiWatawtime.themnMmmtrmst wm*withteeto olmt nbseth haelnandmy Mummodl9 UmtIanscantor [ranges silk, havebemmWeb HOsslgn progmmiorihls omse, Oxnerltenanl man resubnit,Rmgesbt Assouauoliz apprtnal. fie ArdlrtmimlPeAew[ommldee rtsmmtlledgrttorek,taM vgnmey leeldo rwi mmgy with tee 1nRm aM sp,rt d 1Ns Ma da Sign Progam. b,M Rvpn SMw Ttk Urvers mbr /aa9:Waltiv¢54rvm¢ppunewNs.CP eb5N amamm thin CMene Scl P, IWN a0,3f10 N."ZI6-32", Nmetq CuumvngaU nMnyN¢tuwvenet wwwNetkYgrtlxwrine pits oa u.n Sign Design S Style - Standards All cottage must bearchgMurally Consistent wish no overal WWkm memo. Owhers/TenI must obtain appro M Immbuth lire Aroldectum! Review Committee and the ON Planning Department. An owaerVismants will be permlNed k have up to two (2) lines Of letter copy. Each mormlenant R fmmus! to a mae!mum of 150 SF of Willing Signed. For owrlgs/kNeVi wHRa Iogo.IN logo shall not exceed AS- uhNght. ownecrtmot name snap IKK a%ad M' In Doubt ion a sage, lihe of last an, "t bill excis o 19- in Night for two Imes d felt Far eMM1HsftMants kill, two DIIM as Cow. total De„yhl 0 bath Inver er may (combbkd, Ship Mt aceed AB' - All stem snMl De centered on the sign lace horlapntally and vertically in An area. Owners/Tenants milk of permitted entry eenhflcation and hours of oahmilon Inrormdt)on on main enlm m Mass only. All grapl!Cf on Wars shoal R exteror mo arad and shall Niemand! 2a" h!gh a 2a" in kldgR 5Nk%seen or pRmgfe Sen3ltivP v!nyl are acceptable. Total duorywindow glaphics shot net eeReV 29ei of the Cannot 6001serelroat area. Ownerstenants kill be Permitted to dsplay, one a)!pca TM "a Nea shall oe IMIWpp w!NIP the Sun Nee Ilmnahn.n but and eeceedllig 25su of the overall sun lea All sign colors proposed by ownen/tana ds must be approved by the ArchtMuml Review Committee Dr.. to fabrication and others m the Inikwide guidelines Sign colors man be seecled to moo sufficient contrast agmnst WMK tacegrwM agars. Sun coins shad W WmPebde wllh ma condiment buildup background colors, Tenant my ChCaSe Cmpom , Ingo colors subject to Architectural Review Commtnee's approval. w . 0 • • • TlieDesignFactor Sign Construction REOVIRCAGEMS Tire AMMIteb rai Review Committee shall approve all sign Noon. color moll construction per the Chbwint, PROHIBITED SIGNAGE GMeral All sign bald, ti atenhee and mounting devkes shall Consist of hot -dipped gdlanaed Inn, starless Stet. oummum brass. ecrae, radial or cadmium platen material. Alpk pups aNXW to letter sides kill hot M pe r RelL Surfaces On aver ones omhe 10 fading tee. pastNs fk m"I Intense reds) shall be Coated wph ullmvluet Innlbamp clew cps[ In a matte, gloss. Or semi "Amish. No table Von matarWs of env Im will W pecmgted. The tare of the loam lelten and bias shah bin blrvlic lin6'thick mlmmum). AN suns and their installation must Comply with A (Coal tAlgrg coon. All sign fabrication wore shag he of abeleni quality. All muscle and type, Styles shall be accurately reproduced. Lettennp that approunral" type Styles will not be acceptable. The Architectural Review Committee Naives the not to reject airy fabrlallon work deemed to be below standard. Color ocathat shl ecactly makn the colon spectkd an the approved plans. Jmnue of mater ms shill be finals d in an incanspxswus manner, Deals, scents and other fasteners that axiom to vpRle surfaces Shan be fhl time. and finished so as to bin unrobvmal e. Ad sign finishes get be free tram dust. daps. end tuns she shall hue a uniform sunac, conforming to me hlgnest standards at the heuslry, In no a'@snail any manufacturer's label be visible from normal threat varying Angles. Color of exterior letter returns shall be sublect to Arcmledural Review Committee approval. No Aqn cabinNa will be allowed. No advertising daurdSrsttucturts, Inflatable suns. rope Sepni paledrg signs. reader board Signs treeenaddire suns, decuretree Ilphting, things, badoons pennants. names, Insignia, trademarks or other desc idha materiel Shall be affixed or mdnklrkd upon other the mission or extensor glass panes supports a! the Shaw wi eowsor Wen m upon the eiterbr wails of We Wilding. No labels will be permitted on the exposed surface of signs Incept these raaulrsb by Coal moinarice, *KM Mal he Applied in an Incense cuws Iacat!on Sign Will in Cans are Net Mrm d unless othersnse s,aadii No maways am Rnmlied. Painted kttering Is met permitted. No anlmaled Nothing, rotating Or auddele suns are canniest. No banners shot W aWwed unless approved by the Architectural Revise Committee and Permitted by the City Cgwerr en1M Shad Moe Swea Xumew Zoos} LASr.1esarmw'iine H ft. CA 12652 aP,:o!:n S:.n C'fw•a S'C2 R, !9KI16P9YJ Ina .9K� W'1a6p Pw,cb turmmgf, a nr,e4feNnnori[w Dad yew cookie^nrd^'<.- bAw ad,:4 r T to A N Summary of Sign Criteria Description Location Width A Pr0lect1aml.1katim Monument GIUun4 5 6" R-Tenant Mam hlo, n( Gn3una 7 V C Tenanl BUIWIng Sign wall 40' 0- 0 AWIen Numerals waa 60" E- Sulte Entry A4aleaa wall 24" r- Sude Entry Graons way 1. . • • • ! • TheDesignFnctor Height Area 4--0" 24 V 4'0• 24 SE 48'Logn ISO SF 36" tIvngla Ilseoftext) 19" Leattteorsrs Rwq IiINs PI ter[t ZC" 7 5r .' 25r 24" 4$r 4.�a.al 2N3$Ltl41Pm AtMs. L.aV.e NIIIAU 9Ib53 �1DK1]a165}SG 6.:949ia43ag3 Ne41tiaMMlpienan�l .w meaeo4nl.[ter.a.: Ouantity Prat.. IIIM tIN. SM�Mnna. 9Ind J.rU Summuryel ^.ip+4itlr4 Pontlpycamc'gy C4 Sl 08 08.11 I T1 w w ........... I •II � r Y r 4� I ca. �� .�t, 9 { g I— � msm � � was.s aF � � +• Q. -rye t �` :IL'c AulAt U _ v SIGN AFEAbLP3 1 „ SIGN ARIA 3 LP3 .._._. UTICA AVENUE I 1 MASTER- Sign Location Plan kak: NI aanl.umnAw.uy.,owhcA 4xesx .nsuo cy. iom�vw ' • � � � � TlleDesignFitttor al.aaxaaanxso RNM6(Yxaax Iu.I„u,®,ay4u LP oweax.�.a..vm ...n.srml.*rm ow C! t4t) I SIGN AREA 1 - Sign Location Plan Scale: NTS �+/� 1W)S Lu0&F5O n+w.[1"3286) 9565) • • � S L/JeDesignFi�etoY m.(a.n,ao-ms4 n.�sw�eo.:ee, c.a.Yamwlwaw..ia .Y.;nubYwr.':otLu vWbw .M 6 Wlu e«Yro c•.<m�wp. c. Legend Rc 4gn L,R 4t'. 4 Na�xt'0b�.1'I K.IGn MOTYnM B tmml AdlbefSMmWnm1 ' C hnmt Bwtl^09w o sm.ry xmW.n z r wacnvv AaeYe r wmmnrw.pum z WOYe Ywww.. a w..•.. w W.n Y..IrtlFywlAryw.mgYltllwtl WY M.a W K/yiW YbYniw.MYIMW'�1.4WilWm ry r.vl. North — flwlTltl. S'w lo.t. Rm --flow NpMv LPt Gb r.. .. .. ....i..�..�...........................7 t� I I _ I I BLgLDNG 2 144395 SF I I I I I I l' 71 B UTICA AVENUE 1 SIGN AREA 2 - Sign Location Plan Sc.w NTS .. • • ! • TheDesignFactor n lh X6 ' LpXirye OR RM[IIMn1YkH4n MnwMM - e Thnw iWh.p wnwgm c W.1 ewwNl S* c miMwnra E wa.[ntry moss o 1 %a. DO'c 11 o u.mn.l=rwrmear+er..nwgr. a�.«,�.n. CMst PgIM 1nM Tltl1 6XM N9Ma 26g2Lb/JIWi, 9.MW.lIpuMMJ;1iA 9M5] 41ni Ylka $Ii�La(iM.m P.n LP2 in KNI M?[>50 i...9Ai6NSiif Nen4e G�Oma.�Ei In[4Pv9MM101ifutrN q«:pftl[1YnM:w,4.t dr 06r'Ii 133tl1S A311N3S • .A F1-F6 Pg46 I Elevation Scale: 112" =1'-p" % • • • • TheDesignFactor C. — IpQZLUAIwnaaemue.Lapw,eNelyca m653 M. Pool !?W Is loss, 64}2863 VlM9e.:XIG!<m.Ml www.InNl9pn la[tga4 Sign Type A - Project IdedtHloation Monument S:rgle voed lwn-iilumnale8 painting foorketrtl aluminum tab.wt palntad to match Frazee CL 2336A'Isawbeem". Project name to be 2`deep fabricated aluminum letlem pining laanhew, 8%,W s.mloum and pin mamletl A off cabinet. rabrcated hanzontal aluminum bar painted Matthews Sat. white. Concrete base With vertical rwea: lines Concrete to be paled to with Raze, CL 32flw "Piecid" with tooling as required by sign labncatat'S Siructoral enginwing calculations. Pnvide V" Smdptp natural grey Concrete nt slrlp I"above woe if In wd. Tvwlate Futuna Medium Condensed note: PrecGe bratlon to be oeterm.ed In field by Owner 'wesentabne. r- Iw-1 2 End view Scale: 12" =1'-0" +m aua.. 517 Try A A.1 awslm aamrnw.0 Prewst Mewilusfa:n wmum.m Gb m—gaeM Be It, aage le mwnllna Wlnts ll Tnk evem. wum. V., I I � fully welded Z's, aluminum angle frame I I I 1 EQ. I I I � TEQ. — I o00 .,q o 1 liOG� mGa�- mGo I ••• P. nGVO . AlumNum tub Pb m oO � d OJpP GLl Op O [ ca cO as nuOb �qG. G a n m `J o C. oepo c o0 0 CJn e (r O e 6r O n N G O r+ Cencarte babe will vertical m[allfral '000 FmJ= match building cmtrete C Go c 0 Gfo u G o wnnlaaunga,rewlrteby p O c, ? J sign la0rkat0AetNCNlel cnglnagtlllg [NdlitlMe. O o0 a0 G p e 1 ' Section Sca1e:1 1/2" =1'-0" • ® 4 ® a to a DeDesignFactor Calrca[t 26432 Lae Allures Avenue. Laguna HIIB. CA 9E653 Pn.049,360-5250 M.ry4916432663 the A+51gN9e1M0[baFlel VAN-Mege9rnla[Nelic PNI•[t 41hd I Ran[Incu Cufamp:gq CP L $hadn't. 511•e114uni sirn'rwen A.2 1 Pr.leclbentlllalbn Mernmem gab 0&I}R t Elevation Scale112" =r-D" 6.- W S-)1/2' �A 60' Multi tenar: Option TheDesignFaetor lwnM 2M321e1 A9un:Ivmut Upuns N1In. ca 9M53 lw,laaa:awnao F. iealleAi,IW IhbYer.IKILKKeW Mr wAv.IMtlWpnlx:er t'I Sign Type B -Tenant Acidness Monument Ddoo ubM rromWuhdato Minted late"te6 alumlmlm Cabinet painted to match Frazee CL Zn6A -Bluebeard Prolect rmme to be 2" debt, fabr:Lated aluminum letters Muted Mabbews Brushed AIuMh.M and pm mounted t/B" on cabinet. r deeo fab ted aluminum! entire panels panted to match Fooee CL 2IMA S.ebeard' wdh uederAidant onal to ae rtldn Wfarmznce f,M surface applied vhvl In hoject font of tenanls u,o mark FaoncMM forRonsal a:ummum bar panted Mathews Satin White. [ vte bade wiM veMical nneal Imes. Concrete to oe panted to melR haze¢ CL 2nW "Plecle.41, hotrod as reWued by sqn fabricNn's Mr.dural engineering calculahons PrrvMe 12' !mood natural mN Concrete mac step. l-above grade" m M tyralaw: Future Meamm Conderned Note: PFMIae location to be determined In field by owner rebfesentatl'm 2 End View S:ale: V2"=I�p" )nMl1 !aM T111= _ —EMII MUIMw 40 a V0U 9A+FVP!! &� awoa crrwwmw.=^ I., ammo wc•ummt the den I, Fnnpvx61p 4F b[u[m [e wpnanppoNlS - _ fimrUIN NJMnum q[Ina pW�Y wNtlH 2' iy. NYmNwn anplilrxm coMrlir OIY YIIn Trinn rryM111Mf -- _ fWMta nN[n Wi101np [m[rN[ �. wkk[pptlnp nr3plirNM xpli nericAlnry pW[tarsiMPMlrinp [N W'f�'an\ - - I I 1 Section SOW 1 l!21. 1- a- s TheDesignFaaor — Mb3LUApWAilupun,LpweMIIf.G5M53 o1n 3II6u N[Ip69136 v%[[. 00, 61}x055 RmWCu[J�nRpo.CA n+rsara:tprxe.nN w...mm[upnn[•sou SnM Title SMtl IWmEw Sum TY B 8 2 Ta4n1 A61ei5MwJmmt o3w ea[a r Sign Type C - Tenant Building Sign (One Row of Text) Painted3deepfaulute rewmepanchannelaluminumletters mMlur Togo C090 faces am.063 returm mmlmuml pin mounted to AM with nk" deep Ttand9tt6 moNd to matrh pu110ind color. $,(yn Iry,Tt tR pP.Wn'lllymlMNed, Sim colors Composipon must W aoprowd by the AntIIKNIN Review Committee and re City, MAX LOGO HEIGIn MMAXM UTTER HEIGHT I TENANT NAME I Tenant Building Sign - Typical Front View (One line of text) - 150 SF MAX SIGNAGE AREA LINE INDICATING 40'0- MAXIMUM TENANT SIGN AREA " FOR ONE LINE OF TEXT ono TENANT j NAME I c o if Typical Elevation IOne line of fpetl Stale: I;IE' - I'.: A y y TheDesignFactor Cnitrl � PNIM 26422Ln AltoMuAuww.6a9un.HJp,CA 9111 Am60. ft 19Nf16p wr, R, LGIMn3LCA Bawl title NM MmlBv SIPTYpAC C-1 Tmmr Bm`!ae T'p� M osu n DOUBLE LINE T MP%LETTER NEM:XT MAX LCGD� 0 MA%COMBINED TENANT NAME `=R"EIG� Tenant Building Sign - Typical Front View (Two lines of text) Scale:.,» = r. 11.1 150 SF MAX SIGNAGE AREA Typical Elevation (Two lines of text) slade:'ll6" = V 0" TheDesignFactor Sign Type C - Tenant Building Sign (Two Rows of Text) Painted 3" deep fapdcated remorse at, channel alumdnum letter, andlur ICp01.090Mots and.0 3 returns. min!munno p!n mounted to wall want 1-1/2"deep stano-o!ls panted to match Widdbry coMc SIQn mUf[!le npY'NYIIA'lla[pp. Sion color and commositlon must by approved by the kchitectWal neview Committee and the CIIy. LINE INDICATING MAXIMUM TENANT SIGN AREA MAX FOR TWO LINES OF TEXT t CeNM — 2W32Lb Anurst Avanw.l➢pW x4P CA 9M5] rn..Ya9l aaasso r..,9w,ao4sa2 meaes9xxlaraae.+x ...mwwenlum.a� hslM —.. MM lltla 6Mx Nxeaf b1,6KW VWT.c C.-Z MMtM Cu[ammaYCA T.1 IhAd pS:¢, deb ,ewm T TI 0) -13 to VI W 0000 t Address Numerals - Typical Front View Typical Elevation neDesignFaetor ADDRESS NUMBERS Sign Type D- Address Numerals r rui. rc0 wqs: numerals painted Matthews Satin Black and flush mounted to naN with 0late a'M 511tom, Typrace: Ntum Medium Condensea CaMM ProlSel 5aM 1kIL SMtl WmM ZfiYIISaa Allures.uenye,toplari XlnL CL 9ZE5l Ylne Wee SldnTryro D.1 9n..9tfl I60'T9'J (. .9N�EA}Za63 .e i`o Cu(mcn9L CA AM.R 1.11 bb IMa"9'9ilwi(a. o.l •.e:n.a.,<enrx:cai do-un. — EQ. EQ —1 A fII EQ �1 2 Suite Entry Address ---Typical Elevation Scale: 3; a' = P0" w r, ear a) TheDesignFactor E U[.m AnValAVwYW.LmawwnlLCA 3Ms5 Ri. Aa91 aap5190 f. �9K+6A}aay3 reae+.��asw+ay. rx ....wwaauwtauccu Sign Type E - Suite Entry Address hT' M.FCO.vklelhx painted tpsnahh Frazee 001 white andflush Wu nld On WOOM pest with d/f laps AM sPione-Prg9ide subsurface=i,eC while high pwfi ncevinyl loner on MSWegf Almstghide mounnip meth", TYdela[e: rYlwa MedWm CgM¢mp9 1 Suite Entry Address • Typical Front View _. P-1-0 .. .. _ _—anew rnb ---� __—SMtl NumwP nnp M;.9 sWrrro.n E1 PspAp L:cupiSw Li SWIe EnkY bmnn mr raw r 2u :-T 2. a. 2 Suite Entry Graphics - Typical Elevation Scale: 3/8- = P-0- .. d 0 ® TheDesignFactor Sign Type F - Suite Entry Graphics Surf apoWmhte high perfq b,b vinyl"Whipr graplpo to he pt0yM by awrmrnMSM. Graphks mar math"MMewnrs rn lborak WON a %M9 he sown m pole¢ Waco: FNura Medum enMenw cansact eml.n sh.w na. Sh. hJvahw 2M 32 Lq MIuldL A'.enul.Lyvx X85.<A 9A53 <MA Jina iy"VClS F.1 M. MM'w 5754 h.9Wi! 2861 nlinmiucsnLviW.`-A .u.[l Cnx-I w4'•:5 IM.ttipNrluirlu.M nwwNMesanfanalt� 1 0 p9 a 17 -- 7-73 I1lL.I nl nl tIR . Mill. W � y n i J J V 1 V 1 1 1 Y M. CL U M, F1-F6 Pg56 r------------------.� N 5 a aw EXHIBIT O N Z g N a W U U .— }' w� 006 cD 2 i X W W S F1-F6 Pg57 ---------\ ... ••, ,,., I!(" !,°:��`,` ecee9Seas«eeee9 N \§: ; e-R R2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — J i 0 $F QOF w w xg= i �wwo �oJ� Qy�w a M rplL�. 8� 1 Efia�tf4[t'p gi. 6g9ag 3 c@ E¢33fiplyyYT ii !gig e��En3E5"bg ?3tno�gy66° g9E gtt'3$aR3�}'tgiE i3S n 55 E all E'7 E'EiF' }gfeR3s EaR „�5p��yy,p"3�ngggE �g"Es 5 R'a;pEcx Eps R �I STAFF REPORT - PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: December 14, 2016 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C',,UCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner BY: Dominick Perez, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PRE -APPLICATION WORKSHOP FOR DRC2016-00826 — PDC OC/IE LLC — A Pre -Application Review of a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial buildings with a combined floor area of 305,745 square feet on a parcel of about 14.02 acres, that is part of a vacant property consisting of 3 vacant parcels with a combined area of 25.6 acres (not including street dedications which will be vacated), located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park V) District — APNs: 0210-081-19 and 20. Review Process: The Pre -Application Review process provides a project proponent with the opportunity to present schematic designs to the Planning Commission prior to a formal application submittal, in order to receive broad, general comments and direction. The focus of the meeting is a discussion by the Planning Commissioners regarding the technical and design issues related to the proposed project..The meeting is not a forum for debate and no formal decision or vote is made. After the meeting, staff prepares general minutes of the meeting, which are provided to the applicant. Site Characteristics: The project site is located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue and is comprised of 2 parcels with a combined area of 14.02 acres and is currently undeveloped. To the north, across Bentley Street, there is a multi -tenant office complex. To the east, across Utica Avenue, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently reviewing a Design Review (DRC2016-00670) and a Specific Plan Amendment (DRC2016- 00931) application for this site; a proposal to develop a 235,325 square foot industrial building. To the south, across 4th Street within the City of Ontario, is a residential apartment complex. To the west, at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently processing a Pre -Application Review (DRC2016-00626) for this site to obtain feedback from City staff and the Planning Commission for the proposed development of two hotels and a restaurant. The zoning of the subject property and the properties to the north and west is Industrial Park (IP) District and Haven Avenue Overlay District (HAOD). The HAOD occupies a small portion along the western property line that extends from the north to south end of the property and is approximately 10 feet in width. The zoning of the properties to the east is Empire Lakes Specific Plan Area 5. The zoning of the property to the south is Urban Residential District (Ontario Center Specific Plan), which is within the jurisdiction of the City of Ontario. Project Overview: The project involves the development of three (3) industrial logistics buildings that contain a total of 305,745 square feet. The office and warehouse square footages within each building are as shown in the table below. EXHIBIT R F1—F6Pg60 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2016-00826 - PDC OC/IE LLC December 14, 2016 Page 2 Building Area (Square Feet Building 1 Building 2 Building 3 Total Office - 1st Floor 5,500 3,250 2,000 10,750 Office - 2nd Floor 5,500 3,250 2,000 10,750 Warehouse 112,000 141,145 31,100 284,245 Total 123,000 147,645 35,100 305,745 Building one, which is located north of 4th Street and west of Utica Avenue, contains potential office areas at the southwest corners of the building. Building two is located approximately 150 feet to the north of Building one and is shown on the conceptual site plan to contain potential office area at the northeast corner of the building. Building three is located south of Trademark North Parkway, approximately 60 feet north of Building two, and contains potential office area within the southeast quadrant of the building. Each building will be made up of concrete tilt up panel walls that incorporate decorative reveal lines as the primary building material, with a combination of glass, metal awnings, columns and decorative texturing as the secondary building materials. The buildings will be setback from the street and interior property lines to meet the minimum requirements. The project will also comply with the maximum allowable building height and floor area ratio (FAR) for the Industrial Park District. The site has a total of six vehicular driveway access points: two along Bentley Avenue, two along Utica Avenue and two along 4th Street. The northwesterly and southwesterly driveways are designed to be shared entrances to allow access to the properties to the west of the subject site. The site contains a total of 216 parking spaces that are equally distributed throughout the entire site. According to Section 17.64 of the Development Code, the project is in compliance with the required parking ratios specified for industrial uses based on the square footages provided. Auto Parkinc Required Building 1 Building 2 Building 3 Stalls Office 1/250 s.f. 44 26 16 86 Warehouse 1st 20k @ 1/1,000 s.f. 20 20 20 60 2nd 20k @ 1/2,000 s.f. 10 10 6 26 above 40k @ 1/4,000 s.f. 18 26 0 44 Total 92 82 42 216 Each building contains trailer dock doors. Buildings one (12 doors) and two (14 doors) are designed with the dock doors to be centrally located and screened from 4th Street as shown on the site plan. There are 8-foot tall metal manual operated gates at the east and west ends of this dock area, which will screen the trailer parking from the properties to the east and west. Building three contains a total of three dock doors and is shown to include a concrete tilt -up screen wall with an 8-foot wall swing gate around the dock area. Each site contains exactly one trailer parking space per dock door, which is consistent with the Development Code trailer parking requirements. The Development Code requires a minimum of 15 percent coverage of landscape area per parcel or project. The parcels containing Buildings one and three will contain landscape in excess of the minimum requirements, however, the parcel containing Building two will have 12.3 F146 Pg61 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2016-00826 - PDC OC/IE LLC December 14, 2016 Page 3 percent landscape coverage. Although the landscape coverage for Building two is deficient, the overall average landscape coverage for the project is 15.04 percent. The landscape plan indicates there will be trees around the project perimeter and throughout the parking lot, including 15 gallon Brisbane box trees, an evergreen species, along the west end of the site. This will help screen potential industrial uses at this site from future development to the west. The site contains above ground utility lines along the southern edge of the property, on the north side of 4th Street. Two of the poles will need to be relocated due to the proposed right turn lane for the drive approach at the southwest corner of the property. Also, the site plan shows a proposed bus stop along 4th Street. The bus stop detail provided in the full-sized plans indicates the design of the bus shelter will be architecturally compatible to the proposed buildings onsite. The project also involves a proposal to subdivide the site into a total of three parcels. The size of each parcel complies with the minimum lot area requirements specified within Section 17.36.040 of the Development Code (Development Standards for Industrial Districts), which requires a minimum lot area of .5 acres. The table below provides the areas of each proposed lot. Site Area Building 1 Building 2 Building 3 Total Square Feet 256,400 272,161 182,192 610,753 Acres 5.89 6.25 1 1.89 14.02 Lastly, a street vacation application is currently being processed through the Engineering Department for the vacation of two unimproved streets: Trademark Parkway South and Winston Avenue. If approved, this request will eliminate the requirement for street improvements as shown on the attached lot line adjustment exhibit (Exhibit F). This request does not involve the vacation of any portion of 4th Street, Utica Avenue, Bentley Street or Trademark Parkway North. Staff Comments: According to the Development Code, industrial logistics buildings containing office and warehouse areas are a permitted use within the Industrial Park District. However, a portion of about 10 feet in width of the project site that runs from north to south is located within the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Therefore, all industrial distribution uses, including buildings and trailer loading and storage areas, will need to be located outside of this area. Building three, which is shown on the site plan to be setback from the westerly property line by 5 feet and 7 inches, will need to be relocated outside of this area. The purpose of the Haven Avenue Overlay District is to establish a high -end office corridor with special commercial and service related retail to serve office users. According to the Development Code, the "Haven Avenue Overlay Zoning District is intended to result in a progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development." Because of the proximity to the site of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, special attention was given to the building elevations adjacent to 4th Street. As shown on the graphic below, the south elevation of Building one was designed to have an appearance of a multi -tenant office building, which can be seen by the amount of glass used. In addition to the glass and awning elements, the plans indicate a textured material will be used on the building's exterior walls. Staff recommends the concrete tilt up panels incorporate a sandblasted concreted finish, as opposed to a tile or stone veneer. F1—F6 Pg62 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2016-00826 - PDC OC/IE LLC December 14, 2016 Page 4 The site plan indicates there are two employee break areas at the south end of Building one. However, the dimensions are not shown and the amenities within this area are not indicated. Additionally, Buildings two and three are not shown to include an employee break area. Per Section 17.122.030(A)(1)(a) of the Development Code, employee break areas shall be provided for office and industrial projects and provide plazas where employees can rest and eat lunch, preferably away from public entrances to buildings, loading areas, or other high -traffic areas. Tables and/or benches and shade trees and/or shade structures are required. Break areas shall be designed and sized to comfortably accommodate furniture and amenities, should have a minimum size of five hundred (500) square feet and have seating for at least ten percent (10%) of the anticipated workforce. Break areas shall be provided at a rate of one per building within an office or industrial complex comprised of multiple buildings, or one per office area within a multi -tenant industrial building, whichever is greater. The site plan indicates turf block parking is proposed in areas adjacent to Buildings one and two. Section 17.64.080 of the Development Code states, "each required parking space and aisle, shall be graded, drained, and surfaced so as to prevent dust, mud, or standing water and shall be identified by pavement markings, wheel stops, entrance and exit signing, and directional signs, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All new parking spaces shall be painted with double stripe pavement markings." For this reason, staff recommends revising the design of this area to include fully paved parking spaces in place of turf block parking. Buildings one and two have trailer docks and trailer parking within a screened area between the two buildings. Building three is shown to include a concrete tilt -up screen wall and 8-foot tall swing gate around the dock area. For the screening material that will be used between Buildings one and two, staff suggests using a combination of concrete tilt -up screen walls and solid metal swing gates, similar to the material used around the dock area of Building three. With respect to the concrete tilt -up screen walls for Building three, the walls are proposed to be setback from the curb face at the distance of 15 feet. Section 17.36.040 requires all walls that exceed a height of 3 feet to be consistent with the required building setback of 25 feet. Therefore, the F1—F6 Pg63 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2016-00826 - PDC OC/IE LLC December 14, 2016 Page 5 screen walls must be relocated to be setback no closer than 25 feet from the face of curb along Trademark North Parkway. The dock/trailer parking area for Building three contains a drive aisle between the dock parking and employee parking. Because of the relocation of the screen wall per the comments given above, the drive aisle width for this area will be reduced and may create difficulties in vehicle maneuverability. Although the current Development Code does not contain minimum drive aisle width requirements for drive aisles adjacent to loading docks, the previous Development Code (prior to the 2012 Development Code update) did contain these standards, which required a minimum of 50 feet not including additional width for truck parking. Staff recommends maintaining a drive aisle width consistent with these specifications. Discussion Outline Land Use: Although the project is not located adjacent to existing distribution warehouses, and the subject property is partially located within the Haven Avenue Overlay District, the General Plan and Zoning Map allows for the proposed industrial and office uses. The Planning Commission should provide input and state any concerns regarding the proposed land uses. 2. Layout: Staff is generally in support of the overall conceptual site plan, with the exception of the technical issues discussed above. The project is designed in a manner to provide adequate screening to the existing and future adjacent developments. The Planning Commission should provide comments or state any concerns regarding the layout of the site (i.e. parking, trailer storage, drive approaches, etc). Architecture: Staff is generally in support of the architectural elevations that were presented. The materials and design are complimentary to the existing office uses within the vicinity, including the office complex to the north and northwest, the office buildings to the east of Utica Avenue and the office development west of Haven Avenue. The Planning Commission should provide comments regarding the proposed architecture. Required Entitlements: The development of an industrial project on the subject property will require the following entitlements: 1. Design Review - $11,187 2. Tentative Parcel Map - $8,245 3. Initial Environmental Study - $2,853 4. Uniform Sign Program - $2,186 NOTE: Fees are subject to change by Council Resolution. Special Studies: The following special studies will be required at the time of formal submittal: 1. Delhi Sands Flower -loving Fly Focused Survey 2. Biological Resources (birds, mammals, reptiles, plants, flora and fauna habitat). 3. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study. 4. Traffic Impact Analysis. F1—F6 Pg64 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2016-00826 - PDC OC/IE LLC December 14, 2016 Page 6 5. Cultural Resources Report (with Tribal Consultation per AB52). 6. Noise Impact Analysis. 7. Photometric Analysis. 8. Water Quality Management Plan. NOTE: Additional special studies may be required following the formal submittal of the required applications. Respectfully submitted, Candyce Burnett City Planner CB:DP/jy Attachments: Exhibit A - Applicant's Letter Exhibit B - Full-sized Plans (Distributed Under Separate Cover) Exhibit C - Pre -Application Review Department Comments Exhibit D - Engineering Division — Underground Utilities Policy Exhibit E - Engineering Division — Driveway Policy Exhibit F - Street Vacation Exhibit F1—F6 Pg65 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKSHOP MINUTES OF WNCHO CUCAMONGA THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 14, 2016 - 7:00 PM* Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center ***RAINS ROOM*** 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Call 7.45 PM Chairman Oaxaca X Vice Chairman Macias A Munoz X Wimberly X Fletcher X Additional Staff Present Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary, Dominick Perez, Associate Planner; Donald Granger, Senior Planner; Candyce Burnell, City Planner, Brian Sandona, Associate Engineer, Albert Espinoza, Asst. City Engineer, Rob Ball, Fire Marshall, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist ll 11 II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to rive minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. No communication from the public was received. (It was noted that although both items are being heard simultaneously, and an opportunity to comment on each individual project will be given. The final comments for both projects follow the discussion comments at the end of Item B.) Candyce Burnett, City Planner noted that both sites are on the Haven Overlay and relate to a gateway of the City. She referred to the intent of the Haven Overlay and how the designs should reflect this and also how they relate to Empire Lakes as well. She spoke of pedestrian connectivity, a walkable living lifestyle, giving the appearance of office development and how F1-F6 Pg66 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES DECEMBER 14, 2016 Page 2 to work with the hotels with tall massing on Haven Avenue and the City's desire to match the massing. 11 III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 11 A. PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2016-00826 — PDC OC/IE LLC—A Pre -Application Review of a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial buildings with a combined floor area of 305,745 square feet on a parcel of about 14.02 acres, that is part of a vacant property consisting of 3 vacant parcels with a combined area of 25.6 acres (not including street dedications which will be vacated), located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District. B. PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2016-00626 — THERALDSON HOSPITALITY DEVELOPMENT (THD) — A Pre -Application Review of a proposed commercial development consisting of two (2) 5-story hotels with 115 rooms each and one (1) restaurant with a floor area of 8,340 square feet (including an outdoor dining area of 2,000 square feet) on a parcel of about 297,000 square feet (6.8 acres), that is part of a vacant property consisting of 3 vacant parcels with a combined area of 25.6 acres (not including street dedications which will be vacated), located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District, Haven Avenue Overlay District; APN: 0210-081-21. Dominick Perez, Associate Planner, facilitated introductions of the Design Teams for the applicants. He gave a brief description of the project proposals and general site characteristics. He noted that the staff report indicated the Panattoni site had a portion in the Haven Overlay. Staff has since determined that was not correct. A 235,000 square foot industrial building is also under review at the northeast corner of 4' Street and Utica Avenue. Exhibit F of Item A (page 20 of the packet) indicates a Lot Line Adjustment which will be heard by the Council tomorrow. He noted that the Haven Overly should reflect: a prime office corridor; high quality development that is progressive, urban, appealing and eye catching design. He said the restaurant pad is 8,340 square feet and the elevations will be reviewed at a later time. He said Exhibit C for the hotels was only a conceptual design (page 8-15). He said staff has already noted revisions needed in the staff report including decorative veneer suggesting tower elements, glass, glazing and glass accents on all elevations, metal features, trim/accents, metal features and bolder high -contrast colors to emphasize different areas of the buildings. He said the Panattoni development consists of-3 buildings; staff reviewed the square footages and access described on page A-2 of the agenda packet. He said the architecture has been revised and improved with a large amount of glazing, He said the material of the exterior has not been specifically called out but staff suggested a F1—F6 Pg67 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RANCHO DECEMBER 14, 2016 CUCAMONM Page 3 sandblasted surface rather than the proposed stone veneer. Commissioner Fletcher asked why the sandblasted finish is better than stone veneer. Canyce Burnett, City Planner said the stone tends to look more residential. She indicated that the City wants something more sleek/urban. Jacob LeBlanc of Panattoni said they will work with staff to blend in the design. Mr. Perez noted the employee break areas are indicated, but not specific as to what is included in them. He mentioned Turf parking is also indicated, but this material/concept does not currently exist in City standards and should be discussed. Ms Burnett noted it does not hold up well depending upon the frequency of traffic on it She said other materials can be used Mr. LeBlance said they used it to help meet the landscaping requirement. Mr. Perez noted the dock screening area on the north side -wall is required to be on the outside of the building - the setback should be larger for maneuverability and what is shown is very tight. Commissioner Fletcher asked what is proposed for Section i, north of the Theraldson site. Ms Burnett said nothing is proposed yet. Don Cape of Theraldson Hospitality said they currently have 3 hotels in the Cityrunning at 100% occupancy. He referred to the conceptual site plan and said the Hotels are now parallel to the street as requested by staff. Jacob Le Blanc of Panattoni said their work is primarily industrial. He said their proposed design has architectural features and they added glazing and massing. He said they want multiple tenants and with a quasi -retail -tenant mix. He said they broke up the massing for this along with outdoor areas. He said E-Commerce is changing things and the industrial market is very strong. He said they envision this as owner/user retail being absorbed by higher quality industrial. He said they are not opposed to an "Amazon" type facility; a plus is it provides lots of jobs Carol Plowman of Lee & Associates said there is no other product like this in the Inland Empire and it will present a very upscale image. Jacob LeBlanc noted that on Archibald Avenue where QVC is located could have used more -it looks plain. He said this is different. He said they took this same approach in F1-F6 Pg68 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES [Z ,waeo DECEMBER 14, 2016 CocUtov°n Page 4 Anaheim and it has been very successful. Mr. Perez referred to the hotels. He said the report discusses a Development Code Amendment required to allow us to push the buildings up to setback line. He said the amendment would allow them to have the maximum height at the setback line whereas the current Code is a more stepped/graduated approach with less height at the setback but increasing to the interior of the site. He said the idea is to bring them closer to the street for a more urban feel. Mr. Cape asked what the setback would be if the hotel along &I Street was lined up with the southernmost industrial building on the Panattoni site. He suggested they move the hotels back to allow more parking during the day for the restaurant. He said the current configuration will make it difficult to lease out because of the limited parking close to the restaurant pad. He said they have a similar situation across the street and it has not been leased for years. He said he needs about 34 feet to allow for one row of parking with a drive aisle along 4th Street. Mr. Perez invited the Commissioners to comment on the Haven and 4th Street site. Commissioner Munoz noted there was no architecture submitted to look at (the applicant provided a sample from a recent Temecula development) but the sample indicates nice articulation Mr. Cape said the room mix will determine how much articulation is achieved -double queens create the big "bump -outs". Chairman Oaxaca asked if these proposed hotels will be similar to sample hotels He said if that is the case, it looks like they are moving in the right direction. He emphasized a desire for a sleeklmodern design Ms Burnett said with respect to design: Staff looked at conceptual plans and our initial comment is that it is not enough for this location, the City wants higher quality materials. She said the articulation is fine. Mr. Cape expressed cautioned on storefront glazing as it is too costly for this room rate Ms. Burnett said we are looking for a happy balance and where you place these elements is key -quality materials in the right place makes a difference - Commissioner Munoz said the architecture could be punched up. Commissioner Fletcher said it must be upscale and modern for a gateway. He said he is not opposed to setting buildings back off of the street because of the height and if it helps with the feasibility of the restaurant. He said he would like it to come back for a F1-F6 Pg69 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES CR RAN DECEMBER 14, 2016 Page 5 workshop prior to going to the DRC Mr. Cape said they need to get their civil design (site layout) done before investing in the building design. He said they are happy to come back. Commissioner Munoz said he is concerned about the viability of the restaurant. He asked the applicant to work with staff to make it work there in the corner. Chairman Oaxaca agreed. He said they are proposing a significant structure. He said he wants the consistency on Haven Avenue but he would be amenable to pushing back some along 4th Street to allow for parking for the restaurant. Ms. Burnett reported that staff pushed the applicants. She confirmed the entire site is in the Haven Overlay and is a City gateway; a main corner with one chance to do it right. It is a high profile area and there is no chance with office development. She said staff worked with our DOIT team to do this massing study to get perspective to get it right. She asked the Commission for comment on the setbacks. A general discussion occurred whereby the Commissioners considered a possible site layout that considered the one row of parking and also a prior concept that would place one hotel perpendicular to 4th Street rather than the building being placed parallel to 4th Street -the parallel arrangement was requested by staff. Commissioner Wimberly commented on the layout and viability of a restaurant and usable parking. He said he prefers the layout found on B-11 (denotes the 4th Street hotel flipped perpendicular with its short end to 4th street), Commissioner Oaxaca said he is open to an alternative to maintain the current orientation and push it back some (building on 4th Street would remain parallel to 4th Street). He said it is more important to him that both projects look consistent architecturally. Ms Burnett asked about the building adjacent to Haven Avenue. Commissioner Munoz said he is not opposed to what was proposed. He said the applicant should work with staff and keep to the regulations for the Haven Overly and work out the 41" street building orientation. Commissioner Wimberly concurred that they meet the Overlay regulations He said the Commission will weigh in after the standards and requirements are met. Commissioner Munoz said he likes the layout that parallels the street but he is not opposed to pushing back the buildings. He asked hotel #1 along Haven could stay the same but make hotel # 2 perpendicular to 4th to allow for more parking. He said keep F1-F6 Pg70 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES C� DECEMBER 14, 2016 Page 6 the Haven building close to Haven and work with staff Ms. Burnett summarized by noting page B11 - Hotel 1 along Haven to remain as shown but flip Hotel 2 on its end perpendicular to 4th Street. She then asked for final comments on the Panattoni development. Commissioner Munoz said it looks good, the elevations are pretty good. Mr. LeBlanc said their next step could be to submit. He said the eyebrows and columns will be stainless steel; they are trying to get away from earth tones. Commissioner Fletcher said it looks nice and gives an office appearance. He suggested it be more modern, he asked for more glazing on the west side of the building. IV. ADJOURNMENT 9:00 PM 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 8, 2016, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign In on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are F1—F6 Pg71 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES DECEMBER 14, 2016 Page 7 generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under `Public Comments." . Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, T.00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us F1—F6 Pg72 SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Ray Wimberly X 700 P M Rich Macias Candyce Burnett Donald Granger X Alternates: Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca X Additional Staff Present. Dominick Perez, Associate Planner and Tom Grahn, Associate Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS None. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. C1. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19823 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to subdivide one (1) existing parcel into three (3) parcels in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings on a 13.96-acre site within the EXHIBIT S Page 1of3 F1—F6 Pg73 VCr 1 CIYIUCR 1 up LV 1 1 - / .VV r.1VI. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Industrial Park (IP) District located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue — APN: 0210-081-43. Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00402 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to construct an industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District —APN: 0210-081-43. Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2017-00404 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to establish a Uniform Sign Program related to a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District —APN: 0210-081-43. Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016- 00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. The Committee approved as presented and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. square foot multi -tenant commercial building on a vacant parcel of 0.95-acre infl e Ge Commercial (GC) District, on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately ee7 st of Rochester Avenue, located at 11995 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0229-023-s: Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00999, Minor Exception DRC2017- ia Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environm view or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the of a previous Negative Declaration. The Committee approved as presented and rec d that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review ADJOURNMENT 734PM The Desig Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an f f:00 p.m. adjour_rkMoe. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. F1—F6 Pg74 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Dominick Perez September 19, 2017 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19823 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to subdivide one (1) existing parcel into three (3) parcels in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings on a 13.96-acre site within the Industrial Park (IP) District located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue —APN: 0210-081-43. Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC201,7-00408, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00402 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to construct an industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District—APN: 0210-081-43. Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2017-00404 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to establish a Uniform Sign Program related to a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District —APN: 0210-081-43. Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. Background: A Pre -Application Review (DRC2016-00826) workshop was held on December 14, 2016, to discuss the project with the Planning Commission. The applicant desired feedback from the Commission before formally submitting the multiple necessary applications and technical studies. The outcome of the workshop was generally favorable. The Commission was supportive of the proposed architecture and site layout. No major issues or concerns were presented. Proiect Site and Surrounding Land Uses: The project site is located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue and is comprised of one (1) parcel with a combined area of 13.96 acres and is currently undeveloped. To the north, across Bentley Street, there is a multi -tenant office complex. To the east, across Utica Avenue, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently reviewing a Design Review (DRC2016-00670) and a Specific Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00931) application for this site; a proposal to develop a 235,325 square foot industrial building. To the south, across 4th Street within the City of Ontario, is a residential apartment complex. To the west, at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently processing a Design Review (DRC2017-00205) and a Development Code Amendment (DRC2017-00204) for the proposed development of two hotels and a future restaurant pad. The zoning of the subject property and the properties to the north is Industrial Park (IP) District. The zoning of the properties to the west is Industrial Park (IP) ,District and Haven Avenue Overlay District (HAOD). The zoning of the properties to the east is Empire Lakes Specific Plan Area 5. The zoning of the property to the south is Urban Residential District (Ontario Center Specific Plan), which is within the jurisdiction of the City of Ontario. F1—F6 Pg75 DRC COMMENTS SUBTPM19823, DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00406 & DRC2017-00408 September 19, 2017 Page 2 General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject property (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823) into three (3) parcels of 6.02 acres (Parcel 1), 6.07 acres (Parcel 2), and 1.87 acres (Parcel 3). The applicant also proposes to develop the entire 13.96-acre site (Design Review DRC2017- 00402) with three (3) industrial logistics buildings and associated parking and landscaping. The remaining uncompleted street improvements along the southern, eastern and northern perimeter of the site will be constructed with this project. According to the site plan, the three parcels will each contain one of the proposed buildings. Each building will contain an office area and a warehouse area. The square footage breakdown of each building is shown in the table below: Office S uare Feet Warehouse (Square Feet Building Size (Square Feet Building 1 11,000 106,500 117,500 Building 2 7,000 137,395 144,395 Building 3 4,000 27,388 31,388 Total 293,283 Each building will be constructed of concrete tilt up panel walls that incorporate decorative reveal lines as the primary building material, with a combination of glass, metal awnings, columns and decorative texturing as the secondary building materials. The maximum building height for the project is 36 feet and the proposed floor area ratio (FAR) is 48.2 percent. The project will have a total of 216 parking spaces that are equally distributed throughout the entire site. There is a total of thirty (30) trailer parking spaces located adjacent to the dock door areas within each parcel. The site has a total of six vehicular driveway access points: two along Bentley Avenue, two along Utica Avenue, and two along 4th Street. The northwesterly and southwesterly driveways are designed to be shared entrances to allow access to the properties to the west of the subject site. Consistent with the use and size of each building, there will be a varying number of dock doors per building. Building 1 will have 12 dock doors while Building 2 will have 14 dock doors. The dock area for these buildings will be centrally located between them with their corresponding dock doors facing each other and screened from 4th Street and Utica Avenue. There are 8-foot tall metal gates at the east and west ends of this dock area, which will screen the trailer parking from the properties to the east and west. Building 3 will have three (3) dock doors and will include a concrete tilt -up screen wall with an 8-foot tall swing gate around the dock area. Each parcel contains one trailer parking space per dock door; a total of thirty (30) trailer parking spaces will be provided consistent with the trailer parking requirements described in the Development Code. The overall average landscape coverage for the project is 15.04 percent. The landscape plan indicates there will be trees around the project perimeter and throughout the parking lot, including 15-gallon Brisbane box trees, an evergreen species, along the west end of the site. This will help screen potential industrial uses at this site from future development to the west. The site currently contains partial street improvements around the south, east and north perimeter, including improvements from the street centerline to the curb face. This project will involve the completion of the right-of-way improvements, which include the installation of the F1—F6 Pg76 DRC COMMENTS SUBTPM19823, DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00406 & DRC2017-00408 September 19, 2017 Page 3 sidewalk along 41h Street, Utica Avenue, Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North. Also, there are above ground utility lines along the southern edge of the property, on the north side of 4th Street. Multiple poles will need to be relocated due to the proposed right turn lanes for the drive approaches along 4'h Street. Lastly, the site plan shows a proposed bus stop along 4th Street. The bus stop detail provided in the full-sized plans indicates the design of the bus shelter will be architecturally compatible to the proposed buildings onsite. Minor Exception DRC2017-00406: The applicant proposes to reduce the required setback for average depth of landscape along 4th Street by 10 percent. The required average landscape depth is 45 feet. However, the proposed average landscape depth is 40 foot — 6 inches. Per the tabulation section of the site plan, the project is in compliance with the required average depth of landscaping along Utica Avenue, Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North, as required by Table 17.36.040-2. However, because of the installation of the two right turn lanes along 41h Street, the required average depth of landscaping is short by 4 foot — 6 inches. Minor Exception DRC2017-00408: The applicant also proposes to increase the height of the screen wall along Trademark North Parkway by 2 feet. Due to the placement of the building, dock doors and parking area at the north end of Parcel 3, the screen wall was placed within the setback area. Per Table 17.36.040-2, street frontage walls are required to have a maximum height of 3 feet. However, since the intent is to screen the dock area from public view, the applicant is requesting to construct a 5-foot tall screen wall, as seen from the public right-of-way. Also, as shown on the section drawings of the site plan, a landscape berm will be installed adjacent to the wall, which will further assist in the screening of this area. Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404: The applicant proposes to establish a Uniform Sign Program (USP) for the project as required per Section 17.122.060 for industrial complexes with multiple buildings. This is to create a coordinated project theme of uniform design elements, such as color, lettering style, and placement. The proposed USP includes signage criteria for one (1) project identification monument, three (3) tenant identification monuments, tenant building signs as well as addressing and suite entry graphics. The monument signs, which are located along 41h Street, Utica Avenue and Trademark Parkway North, are designed to be compatible with the proposed architecture and will incorporate a concrete base and aluminum elements and lettering. The tenant building signs have been designed to allow for one or two rows of text and a logo for each tenant to be located adjacent to their office area. Tenant building signs are also required to be 3-inch deep fabricated reverse pan channel aluminum letters and/or logo pin mounted to wall with 1-1/2-inch deep stand-offs painted to match building color. Staff Comments: The proposed project is well -designed and is consistent with the existing industrial development within the vicinity and the proposed industrial development to the east of the project site. The Tentative Parcel Map complies with the City's development standards, which includes a required minimum parcel size of .5 acre. The architecture and site design is compliant with City development standards and design guidelines, including building height, building setbacks, landscape coverage, FAR, vehicle and trailer parking, with the exception of average landscape setback along 4th Street and maximum wall height along Trademark Parkway North. Staff is in support of both Minor Exceptions as they will help achieve the design goals for the area. Furthermore, the Minor Exceptions will not affect the minimum landscape coverage of 15 percent or screening requirements that are required for projects within the Industrial Park (IP) District. The buildings will be setback from the street and interior property lines to meet the minimum. The USP F1—F6 Pg77 DRC COMMENTS SUBTPM19823, DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00406 & DRC2017-00408 September 19, 2017 Page 4 was revised to eliminate wall mounted illuminated signage to eliminate any negative signage glare issues Major Issues: The following design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: None. Code Compliance Issues: According to the Photometric Plan, the project will be in compliance with the illumination requirements for industrial areas. However, the Photometric Plan includes a detail that indicates the dimensions of the light pole, which includes footing and a pole with fixture. The detail shows a portion of the footing will be exposed above ground, with a height ranging from 2 foot — 6 inch to 4-foot, with a 25-foot tall pole on top of the exposed footing. Since the maximum height of outdoor lighting within industrial areas is 25 feet, staff recommends adding a condition that requires a revised graphic to be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. The graphic shall show the height of the outdoor lighting standards, measured from ground level, inclusive of the pedestal, to top of illumination fixture, and shall be no more than 25 feet in height. . Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of -sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on -site to match the building. 2. All ground -mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back -flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on -center. All ground -mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. The employee break area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the building, and tables, chairs/benches, and waste receptacles shall be provided. F1—F6 Pg78 DRC COMMENTS SUBTPM19823, DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00406 & DRC2017-00408 September 19, 2017 Page 5 4. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. Where tubular steel wrought iron sliding gates are used, they shall be backed by solid or perforated metal sheeting painted to match the fence or gate. 5. All walls, including retaining walls, exposed to public view shall be comprised of the same material as the primary building material or shall be constructed of decorative masonry blocks with a decorative finish such as stucco textured to match a concrete tilt up wall. 6. All outdoor lighting shall be recessed and/or constructed with full downward shielding in order to reduce light and glare impacts on trespass to adjoining properties and public rights - of -way. Each fixture shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights -of -way, so that no light fixture directly illuminates an area outside of the project site intended to be illuminated. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the proposed project and forward the project to the Planning Commission for final review and action. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee approved as presented and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. Staff Planner: Dominick Perez, Associate Planner Members Present: Commissioner, Ray Wimberly; Commissioner, Francisco Oaxaca; Donald Granger, Senior Planner Additional Staff Present: Additional Staff Present: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner F1—F6 Pg79 Summary Report of Neighborhood Meeting 41h & Utica (DRC2017-00402) NWC 4th Street & Utica Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA On the evening of August 29, 2017, CP Logistics Utica, LLC (the "Applicant") hosted a Neighborhood Meeting for the 4ih & Utica project located at the NWC of 4°i Street and Utica Avenue (DRC2017-00402). The purpose of the Neighborhood Meeting was to provide property owners within 300' of the 4'h & Utica project site an opportunity to ask questions and express any concerns about the proposed 41h & Utica project. Prior to the Neighborhood Meeting, the Applicant mailed a letter on August 16, 2017 to all property owners within a 300' radius of the 40' & Utica site. The mailed letter, as well as a summary of the property owners to which the letter was sent, are attached hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B respectively. During the meeting, the Applicant provided a (1) check -in sheet, (2) multiple note pads and pens for use by attendees, (3) multiple full size foam presentation boards to showcase the proposed 0 & Utica project, (4) refreshments, and (5) multiple copies of an 8-1/2" x l l" handout which included all of the plans (site plan, elevations, conceptual landscape plan, etc.) to adequately depict the proposed project. A copy of the handout provided for attendees' use is attached hereto as Exhibit C. There was only one (1) property owner who attended the Neighborhood Meeting to learn more about the 4'h & Utica project. His contact information is enclosed below: William Amor Amor Architectural Corporation 10300 41h Street, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: (909) 259-9971 Email: Willianx«amorarch.com After the Applicant provided Mr. Amor with a summary of the proposed 4 h & Utica project through the use of the full size foam presentation boards, Mr. Amor expressed his general approval of the project. Aside from his general approval, Mr. Amor had verbally expressed a few questions which were of interest to him as the owner of a building located along Trademark Parkway to the northwest of the 4'h & Utica project site. Enclosed below are Mr. Amor's questions (black font), along with the Applicant's provided answers (red font), which were considered acceptable by Mr. Amor: • Will there be public sidewalks along the project frontage? Applicant: Yes, there will be sidewalks along all four (4) streets (4'h Street, Utica Avenue, Bentley Street, & Trademark Parkway) which comprise the 0 & Utica project's frontage. • How will the Applicant screen trucks within Building 3's truck court? Applicant: As part of the proposed 40h & Utica project, Building 3 will incorporate concrete screen walls to screen trucks located within the truck court from public view. • How heavy will the truck volume be on Trademark Parkway going to Building 3? Applicant: Due to the (1) small size of Building 3 (t31,388 SF) and (2) the project's primary access point to be located on Utica Avenue, the majority of the truck traffic will occur on Utica Avenue and not on Trademark Parkway. Additionally, the Applicant will be required to install stop signs at the intersection of Trademark Parkway and Winston Road to allow both cars and trucks to safely navigate the intersection. EXHIBIT T F1—F6 Pg80 • There is currently an existing "bump" in the asphalt on the south side of Trademark Parkway along the project's frontage which was likely caused by a nearby tree's root system putting upward pressure from below the street. Will the Applicant fix this nuisance as part of the proposed project? Applicant: While the Applicant is unaware of any requirements conditioned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga at this time to fix this nuisance, the Applicant will strongly consider fixing this nuisance as part of the proposed 46' & Utica project for the safety and enjoyment of cars and trucks utilizing Trademark Parkway. Mr. Amor sent the Applicant an email on August 30, 2017 to summarize his thoughts regarding the project, which the Applicant has attached hereto as Exhibit D. Enclosed below is a summary of the exhibits attached hereto: • Exhibit A — Letter Mailed to Property Owners • Exhibit B — Summary of Property Owners • Exhibit C —Handout Available at Neighborhood Meeting for Owners' Reference • Exhibit D —William Amor's Email Comments dated August 30, 2017 Thank you, CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: CP Logistics Platform, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its sole Member By: Panattoni CLP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its Administrator By: Panattoni CLP Operator, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its Manager By: Name: Its: William Sullen Vice President F1—F6 Pg81 Exhibit A YOU ARE INVITED TO A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING You are welcome to attend a neighborhood meeting in order to address questions or comments regarding the following proposed development: DESIGN REVIEW (DRC2017-00402) — A proposal to develop three (3) industrial buildings totaling approximately 293,283 SF on a ±13.96 acre vacant land site located at the northwest corner of 4 h Street and Utica Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Assessors Parcel Numbers: 0210-081-19 (Portion), 0210-081-20 Related Files: Minor Exceptions (DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM0002), Tree Removal Permit (DRC2017-00405), Uniform Sign Program (DRC2017-00404) Meeting Time & Location: The Ontario Center School Multi -Purpose Room (MPR) 835 N. Center Avenue Ontario, CA 91764 August 29, 2017 6:00 PM Contact Information Developer: CP Logistics Utica, LLC 20411 SW Birch Street, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Contact: Michael Sizemore Telephone: (949) 296-2989 Email: MSizemore(d?oanattoni.com City of Rancho Cucamonga — Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact: Dominick Perez Telephone: (909) 477-2750 ext. 4315 Email: Dominick. PerezLucityofrc.us F1—F6 Pg82 LOCATION MAP y J Village on the = Sar raa ino >..t y > Green Apartments 0 9 a - "0S1 Subject Site n y Ironwood at Empire = Lakes Apartment Homes Costco Wholesale Q 0 v The Reserve at Empire Four : St ..: ,. Lakes Apartments i ruck .;: Fo ern „ OCentre Club Apartments Piemonte At Q Ontario Center Edwards Ontario Palace ,L '= - Target Q 22 IMAX & RPX Q 2 n AMC DINE -IN =1 ©Ontario Mills 30 s,;r, �00„ Marketplace At Q = Er Citizens Business Ontario Center - Ontario Mills Q O Dave & Busters Bank Arena Meeting Location: Ontario Center School = ~<P Conaours helhy S! q r �"G s On > z rnlanl Empire blva CarMax Q Q Ontario Gateway Center , © San &,-noJrw F:•,v ® ® ® 0 m File#174805 4 " St & Utica Ave Rancho Cucamonga 1.A APN(s) 0230 081 19 & 20 300' Owner August 16 2017 D210 052 02 0000 William 8 Mana Anior 1030D 41h St # 100 Rancho Cucamonga Ca 91730 0210 052 17 0000 Mar Medical Enterprise LLC W73 Haver Ave #A Rancho Cucamonga Ca 91730 0210 081 18 0000 Freeway Industrial Park. 16092 Stratford Cir Villa Park Ca 92861 0210 081 21 0000 1 haraldson Motels II Inc 4255 Dean Martin Dr #J Las Vegas Nv 82103 0210 082 79 DNC Fourth 8 Utica LP 515 S Figueroa St #1600 Los Angeles Ca W71 0210 53103 0003 Camden Landmark LLC Po Box 27329 Houston Tx 77227 0210 531 17 000C EcIr•Vintage LP Po Box 97407 Chicago 1160680 Exhibit B SUSAN W. CASL, INC. 01Y1e! s f" suvincasein, .e emi Gl emteyre Street, Suite 7 • bigiena Bcavli. cA 924551 PIIO;%'!: (949) 494-6105 e PAX r Wyl 494 7418 0210 052 11 0000 Mar Medical Enterprise LLC 9479 Haven Ave $A Rancho Curam nga Ca 91730 0210 052 113 0000 Mar Medical Enterprise LLC 9479 Haven Ave Rancho Cucamonga Ca 91730 0210 081 19 0000 Cp Logistics Utica LLC 20411 SW Birch St #200 Newport Beach Ca 92650 0210 082 51 0000 Inland Empire Health Plan Po Box 180C Ranchu Cucamonga Ca 91729 0210 062 89 oom fourth 76 Utica LP 515 S Figueroa St #a600 Los Angeles Ca 90071 0210 531 11 0000 Redus PUmonte LLC 1 Independent Dr #615MAC230 Jacksonvil;e Fl 372.02 Dominck Perez City of Rancho Cucamonga - Planning 10500 Civic Cenler Drive Rancho Cucamonga Ca 91730 FILE COPS' 0210 052 12 0000 Mar Medical Enterprise LLC 9479 Haven Ave #B Rancho Cucamonga Ca 91730 0210 052 19 UC00 Stone Haven ExeckArive Park Ma nt 19762 Macarthur Btvd #300 Irvine Ca 92612 0210 081 20 0000 Cp Logistics Utica LLC 20411 SK4' Birch St #200 Newport Beavh Ca 926SO 0210 082 78 0000 Fourth 8 Utica LP 515 S Figueroa St#1600 Los Angeres Ca 90071 021 C 082 90 00D0 Fourth a Utca LP 515 S Fryueroa St #1600 Los Angeles Ca 90071 0210 531 12 0000 Redus Piemonte LLC 1 Independent Dr #615MACZ30 Jacksonvi'le FI 32202 Michael Sizemore Panainnni Devpd>pment Company Inc. 20411 SW Bnch St 4200 Newport Beach Ca 92660 F1—F6 Pg84 I F Yor'. A, � III.211 A[1 53 !9 Ar,. 76.!d A: Fy • I' 69• A[ l A I. ______ __------- OL i or. 7, �1 3 '�1 7.71 Ar, �A 1111r I Ro ,� I sa Ro r7 x• L. .. 7 µ I� �12 Ar ru iv v ! Par 3 Ir r. Par. 2 MAE 1:- r.._4l r.s-' •, [ ^16.'� 'I v,e.b �- .. Yoh .•C 'l to 00 Ul E .. --• I �'�' a 3r �.v_�—_...�.....:........___ __._...�.J...�..� ems` e. �I I_yi{ u I its r '.;i Pal (�% I Par' 5 '�( IA.0 A; 1�9J Pcr• 3 (1.,,'-�1, At)� . Par. 2 ] 4.1c RG s � 1 C� Par.` Per p Par.16: a r ,� s[. I 'o 6� U 11411 I 1 A3- N4 ♦A = r 3 s 0-t R1-tiyq I - J t e Fh p17480S -Rrepwtd WJ16/2011 d'SMU0[a A.. Rye C.,a vCA -y %7017999119 g3a 3W rmp rA.pe.a 1USAN W. CASE, INC. VI? GLE6:YCYR[ ST p1' LAGILNA tlracH CA M51 %a0 KJ LioS SUSAN W. CASE, IN 917 GLENNEYRE ST # 7 LAGUNA BENCH CAI 92651 PHONE OR TEXT (949) 494-6105 orders @susancase inc. corn Certification of Preparation The attached list represents the names and addresses of all property owners located within 30V of the exterior boundaries of the following address/APN Address: 4'h St & Utica Ave, Rancho Cucamonga APN(s): 0210081 19 & 20 This Information was obtained through First American Core Logic, a data source utilizing the County assessor rolls and other available.sources. This information is generally deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed. Return of property addresses that are deemed undeliverable by the United States Postal Service is, therefore, a possibility. Susan W. Case, Inc. is not responsible for providing further investigation of said labels_ Acceptanceraf this package acknowledges this fact, Susan W.Case,Inc. Date:08/16/2017 F1—F6 Pg86 1 r- _.._. _.............::_. _... llr, w _ p �. BUILDING_i _ BUILDING 7 ~ — - 117,500 SF $ 144,395 SF —� I i _ - •E�WW � _ ._— �1� 1T I SL 1 r �z MTElnwci 1 —• Y b°I^¢ �- I - j -. - - - - - -- - - - - UMA-AVENUE Tabulation ef�ns •v an .. _... "rot n••"_..� Carr I '\�l north I _�." ;; ;: _ "•• ,,,,,,, Conceptual Site Plan 4TH & UTICA 19611 Btlrtlem M&-Sln At W MM.Q2261: Rancho Cucamonga, CA rJ,m em-17ro rw.nwmsrmr Aerial Map Legend ® _ -- POTENTIBI. W HCE - _ � WMLHOOSC WE - • - • ORM THRO ODOR ra.. Yu. h,aen<.prrh p.r.11 h r.e.tl w•hr.Y"r Yw"YYn.IWA Ytln•xn.e.w ".Ya tlrmYp.Y. n„m."x".�.rtih. aN".unYhy i.rrub Nnbpneer.lral•pY•.rY.nYVx.rltlh. Yelnrtla Y...p.".e r.rhbn a "ere r.n.R. Yrwrtl+hn N.arr....nrh. Mw 2. 20171 JOD M16263 Scheme 17 ♦\ 00 O1 a to LL I LL I I I I P02 14aL /� I I odla RG y IIII BUILDMC 1 x II BUL61NG 2 I h FOOT S44.3r S_ I ' ftEq�^a {gym AN II I ^rt I OIE 4 m.I G .� 1 TEJ f;-. i� T m I6f CLE 00 w — iO2 BUIWING3 OUIIOB]G� %—�-UT�C-A—AVENUE PNOJEOYINFONMATION Om vp ysyPm n Humen AP-1 mn9F LEGAL OF50NIPT10N Aerial SOELEGENO "`BEM =0O Tabulation 'llM12 a Gana: cpWonacmckim ��wmwfumm r� 4th & Uun Cunsdlams: r�tm 16263.00 CONCEPTUAL COLORED ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 1 05.10.2017 Elevation West Elevation East Elevation PA H .r<n nca��, Job No. 4 1626300 CONCEPTUAL C0LORE DELEVATION-BUILDING 2 Elevation Elevation Elevation urc CONCEPTUAL COLORED ELEVATION -BUILDING 3 05.10,201 i y� 4th & Utica mf nw�K'n CP Logistics Utica, LLC Rancho Cucamonga. California � T1 I"= M111 �� HUNTER LANDSCAPE Michael Sizemore Exhibit D From: William Amor - Second Mailbox <william@amorarch.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 1:04 PM To: Michael Sizemore Cc: Bill Beebe Subject: Design Review Michael, Thank you for the presentation yesterday as it resolved all of the issues of concern that I had. I was pleased that there will be a public sidewalk surrounding on three sides the subject property. I am also pleased that you provided more information on the screen wall that will block from view trucks from my property. I was also pleased that only a couple of trucks will be making deliveries along Trademark Parkway and a majority of trucks will be utilizing Utica Avenue. I would like to be brought up to date if there are any changes and also the timing the Trademark Parkway road bump repair. If there is anything you need from me, just let me know, as of this point in time, I am in full support of the proposed design. William A. Amor, AIA President AMOR ARCHITECTURAL CORPORATION 10300 4th Street Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Architectural coreoralion Office (909)259-9971; rax (909)944-8409 NOW LICENSED IN ALL 50 STATES LOS ANGELES— LAS VEGAS — ATLANTA F1—F6 Pg93 Print Form ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) RANCHO (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line) CUCAMONGA Planning Department (909) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so,that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is,importani that -the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial `Study !Part I and the development application, additional information such as,but not, limited to, traffic, noise, biological; drainage; and geological reports maybe required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will notbescheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to, prepare the Initial Study Part11 as required by CEQA. In addition to the:filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies.or reports. INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONS'WILL NOTBEPROCESSED. Please note that itis the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: 4th & Utica Name &Address of project owner(s): CPLogistics Utica, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 20411 SW Birch Street; Suite200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Name & Address of developer or project sponsor: Panattoni Development Company 20411 SW Birch Street, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Updated 411112013 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT U F1—F6Pg94 Contact Person & Address., Jacob LeBlanc, Panattoni Development Company, Inc. 20411 SW Birch Street, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Michael Sizemore, Panattoni Development Company, Inc. 20411 SW Birch Street, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone Number: (949) 296-2989 Information indicated by an asterisk (*) is not required of non -construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale (8-112 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. Please see Exhibit A - USGS Quadrant Sheet.. 2) Provide.a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;.. and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. Please see Exhibit B - Site Photos . 3) Project Location (describe): The 4th & Utica project is located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Uticd Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Additionally, it is bounded to the,north by Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North, and by vacant land to the west. 4) Assessor's Parcel. Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): 0210-081-19 (Portion) 0210-081-20 '5) Gross Site Area (aclsq. ft.): 14.15 Acres / 616,465 SF '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed 13.96 Acres / 608,053 SF dedications): 7) Describe any proposed. general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): There will not be a proposed general plan amendment or zone change for the 4th & Utica project. Updated 4/11/2013 F1—F6 Pg95 Page 2 of 10 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Permits which may be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies may include but are not limited to the following: Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit, Demolition Permit, Grading Permit, Building Permits, Permits for New Utility Connections, Tenant Improvement Permits, Security and Parking Area Lighting Permits, and various Encroachment Permits (Driveways, Sidewalks, Utilities). 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e, geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The 14.15-acre project site is an active agricultural field with planted grape vines with small areas of disturbed, ornamental, and developed land present on the periphery. The soils mapped on the project site are considered potential habitat for the federally endangered Delhi Sands Flower -loving fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis), however the site has been active agriculture since at least 1938 and the USFWS provided concurrence that there is no suitable Delhi Sands Flower -loving fly habitat on site. The site has low potential to support the state special -status burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia). The site does not support riparian habitats or waters that would be considered jurisdictional by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, or the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The project site is nearly flat and is located at an elevation of approximately 1,040 feet above mean sea level (amsl). One small area of ornamental vegetation is present along Trademark Parkway and is comprised of ornamental pine (Pinus sp.) and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.) trees. The alluvium at the project site generally consists of interbedded layers of fine sands, fine to medium sands, and silty sands. SOURCES (Included within 4th & Utica Design Review (DR) Submittal): 4th Street and Utica Avenue Project Biotic Resources Report dated March 27, 2017 Geotechnical Investigation dated October 28, 2016 Updated 4/11/2013 F1-F6 Pg96 Page 3 of 10 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources ofinformation (books, published reports and oral history): No historic resources were identified within the project area that would require further consideration under CEQA. The 4th & Utica site has been used for agriculture since 1938 (est.). SOURCES: Cultural Resource Study Findings Memo dated March 6, 2017; 4th Street and Utica Avenue Project Biotic Resources Report dated March 27, 2017 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: Currently, the 4th & Utica site is affected by standard traffic noise generated from 4th Street, Utica Avenue, Bentley Street, and Trademark Parkway North. The standard traffic noise is not anticipated to affect the proposed uses. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheel(s) if necessary. The proposed 4th & Utica project consists of the construction of three (3) industrial buildings totaling approximately 293,283 SF on approximately 13.96 net acres located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. All three (3) industrial buildings are currently scheduled to be constructed in a single phase. The construction is anticipated to commence in October 2017 and require approximately nine (9) months to complete. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): To the north, across Bentley Street, there is a multi -tenant office complex. To the east, across Utica Avenue, is a vacant, undeveloped site. To the south, across 4th Street within the City of Ontario, is a residential apartment complex. To the west, at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street, is a vacant, undeveloped site. The 4th & Utica project will comply with all of the height restrictions and setback requirements set forth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Updated 4/11/2013 F1-F6 Pg97 Page 4 of 10 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The proposed 4th & Utica project will not change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on -site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? The short-term noise will consist of construction activity over the construction duration of nine (9) months (est.) at noise levels up to 74 Leq dBA. The long-term noise will consist of approximately 68.3 dBA - 72.5 dBA due primarily to increased traffic. No soundproofing measures are proposed. For additional information, please reference the 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project Acoustical Analysis dated April 2017. *16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: There are fifteen (15) mature trees located within the right-of-way (ROW) along the southern side of Trademark Parkway North which will need to be removed. 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains. The 4th & Utica site is tabled to drain into the Cucamonga Creek, Reach 1 (Indirectly). 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at (909) 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) N/A Peak use (gal/Day) N/A b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) 7,000 Peak use (gal/min/ac) 12.15 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. © Septic Tank Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation:(See AttachmentA for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at (909) 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) N/A b. Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac) 2,911 Updated 4/11/2013 F1-F6 Pg98 Page 5 of 10 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: N/A Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: N/A Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): N/A 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $N/A to $N/A Rent (permonth) $N/A to $N/A 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: N/A 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: N/A 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: NIA a. Elementary: b. Junior High: N/A N/A aSenior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: The proposed speculative project may include but are not limited to the following permitted uses per the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan: light -industrial, research and development businesses, green technology, and general and medical office uses. Updated 4/11/2013 F1-F6 Pg99 Page 6 of10 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: Please see Exhibit C - Floor Area Distribution by Proposed Use. 27) Indicate hours of operation: The proposed project is speculative in nature. Therefore, the hours of operation of future speculative users are unknown at this time. 28) Number of employees: TBD Total: Maximum Shift., TBD Time of Maximum Shift: TBD 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): The proposed project is speculative in nature. Therefore, the breakdown of anticipated job classifications, wage and salary ranges, and the rate of hire for each classification, are all unavailable at this time. 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City., TBD *31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): At construction completion (2017), the proposed project is expected to emit the following air pollutants expressed in maximum pounds per day: Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) - 22.74, Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) - 51.72, Carbon Monoxide (CO) - 47.89, Sulfur Dioxide (S02) - 0.10, Coarse Particulate Matter (PM10) - 4.52, and Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) - 3.03. None of the aforementioned exceed SCAQMD threshold levels. For additional information, please reference the AQIGG Emissions Assessment dated April 2017. ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. The relevant water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the 4th & Utica project have been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project. All of these agencies have indicated that they are willing and able to provide adequate service to the 4th & Utica project. Updated 4/11/2013 F1-F6 Pg 100 Page 7 of 10 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCBs; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, it known. In the known history of the subject site, the Applicant is unaware of any historic use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials. For additional information, please reference the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment dated December 16, 2016 and the Phase II Investigation dated December 19, 2016. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. The 4th & Utica project is speculative in nature and therefore, the Applicant cannot accurately indicate whethe� the future users of the buildings will incorporate the temporary or long-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials into business operations. 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: Signature: Title: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED SIGNATURE PAGE Updated 4/1112013 F1-F6 Pg101 Page 8 of 10 SIGNATURE PAGE Environmental Information Form (Part I — Initial Study) May 5, 2017 CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: CP Logistics Platform, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its sole Member By: Panattoni CLP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its Administrator By: Panattoni CLP Operator, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its Manager By: Name: Its: William Bullen Vice President F1—F6 Pg102 Exhibit A USGS Quadrant Sheet MUSGS U. S. MPARTWW OF NE �'OP G�Tl� U .11-,Urtopo IT -ND R LNCHG COt "IONGA Mri 1.7 Project Site a wiR0 ILI FI—F6 Pg103 Exhibit B - Site Photos TRACT No CIVIL ENGINE r r ('f r . O1�r' J • LAND SURVEYING subject b date Job no. shee of to m r. 2"i /P 1` ZvJ� 6 D� 2,2 4 2- I 14349 Fire tone Blvd. a La Mirada, CA9ffl g*OT4el: (714) 521-4811 • Fax: (714) 521-4173 CD { 00 V MOO' OM ^ x L, !I TV O A w , T rt_•. `N1Y _ 0 0 I I I 40. w,. T " �6 r A 1 t 00 U � �0 11 lJ � lJ ° E 7 �O�OVLf =loll V �.O.eO.(1 Q,�n 1 s� `vOF P r '"f"'nt'r ;� 'IL -' t Al tT huSTY jr y 4 Y •Y>K 4 � oao���o� S� o-PR N�. 4 f �� -�� � � _ c _ A t; � � gip. f r�. � + fi d. *' '�,� "�. �' '"r , . w r;< <t-. ,�� ��M f'� �!„ .^ � eT,,• ,,gyp ,fi.,µ ,� _ 1 `� � - .� _tee -_ - s�r^ _. y.+y .,.:. _. —q� ! ,_.i , yn -:..,' .!✓y4 �IOY�raaesii{„'�.;'ii=_=..t..:. ob . 4 0 /.2016 10 : 41 r i 10/03/2016 10"41 4 � 6 Initial Study Background and Project Description Project Title The 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project Lead Agency Name and Address City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number Dominick Perez (909) 477-2750 ext. 4315 Project Location The 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse development is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) west of Interstate 15 and north of Interstate 10, as depicted in Figure 1, Regional Location Map. The overall project site is located on approximately 14.10 acres west of Utica Avenue and north of 4th Street, as depicted in Figure 2, Project Vicinity. Project Applicant CP Logistics Utica, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company General Plan Designation The City's General Plan land use designation for the project site is Industrial Park. Zoning The current zoning for the parcel is Industrial Park (IP) District. Project Setting The project site is located in a predominately industrial and commercial area mixed with multi -family residences and vacant properties. To the north of the project site, there are commercial and industrial properties similar to the proposed buildings. To the west of the project site, there is an actively maintained agricultural site that is being cultivated on a temporary basis, with commercial and industrial properties located further to the west across Haven Avenue. To the south of the project site (across 4th Street), there is vacant, disturbed land and multi -family residential buildings located within the City of Ontario. To the east of the project site, there is previously developed, vacant disturbed land across Utica Avenue. The property is predominately adjacent to commercial office, warehouse, retail, industrial, and residential uses. Avenue Warehouse Project 11 F1—F6 Pg123 II. Description of Proposed Project The proposed 4th Street and Utica Avenue industrial project (proposed project) is comprised of three warehouse distribution buildings (117,500 sf, 144,395 sf, and 31,388 sf for a total of 293,283 sf) with office space, parking, and landscaping on approximately 14.10 gross acres as shown in Figure 3, Site Plan and Table 1, Project Building Summary, below. After dedications by the City are accounted for, the net site area is 13.96 acres. The technical reports prepared for this Initial Study analyzed a prior version of the project which encompassed a larger building footprint than is included in the current site plan. Accordingly, the impact evaluations in the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas and Traffic/Transportations sections are derived from a more conservative analysis of the project. Therefore, impacts from the proposed project would be less than described in the analysis within those sections. The warehouse distribution buildings are currently planned as "speculative buildings." Therefore, the future tenants or buyers of the buildings are not currently known. Without knowing the future tenants or buyers, an exact number of future employees or hours of operation cannot be determined. Therefore, this Initial Study and associated technical reports use approximate potential on -site employees, hours of operation, and vehicular traffic generation based on the project's proposed square footage and use as warehouse distribution facilities. In an abundance of caution, this Initial Study and the associated technical reports have assumed uses and intensities that may be greater than what will actually be built out or put into operation, resulting in a possible conservative/worst- case estimation of impacts. The proposed project would also require discretionary approval from the City for Design Review, a Tentative Parcel Map, and the approval of Minor Exceptions related to setback requirements. In order to comply with required street improvements along 4tb Street, the applicant is requesting a 10 percent reduction to the setback requirement along 4th Street, resulting in an average depth of landscape setback of 40.5'. The applicant is also requesting an exception to setbacks related to wall height. The project is proposing a 5-foot wall in a portion of the proposed project that would screen the Building 3 truck court from view along Trademark Parkway North. The City requires a building setback of 25 feet for a wall over 3 feet; however, this exception would permit the project to use the parking setback of 15 feet which would allow for adequate circulation in and out of the Building 3 truck court and provide required screening of the Building 3 truck court along Trademark Parkway North. Table 1: Project Building Summary Building Site (sf) office 1"Floor(sf) Warehouse (sf) Total Building (sf) Dock Doors Landscaping (sf) Landscaping (%ofsite) Building 1 262,044 11,000 106,500 117,500 13 42,495 16.2% Building 2 264,553 7,000 137,395 144,395 14 32,380 12.2% Building 3 81,456 4,000 27,388 31,388 3 16,436 20.2% Total 608,053 22,000 271,283 293,283 30 91,311 15.00% Access and Parking Vehicular access provisions for the project site would consist of six total driveways: two right -in -right - out driveways on 4th Street, two full -movement driveways on Utica Avenue, and one full -movement driveway on both Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North. Passenger vehicles would have the option to access the project site via any of the project driveways. Trucks would access the project site via the western right -in -right -out driveway on 4th Street, the southern driveway on Utica Avenue, or the northern driveway on Trademark Parkway North. All project driveways would be unsignalized. If not already existing and approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, street improvements will be provided along 4th Street, Utica Avenue and Bentley Avenue to include improvements to curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights, traffic signal equipment and signing and striping. Parking for automobiles, including standard and ADAstalls, would be provided foreach building. Trailer parking would also be provided adjacent to the dock doors at each respective building. Automobile and trailer parking details, including parking requirements, are provided in Table 2, Project Parking Summary, below. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 12 F1—F6 Pg124 Table 2: Project Parking Summary Standard Auto ADA Parking Total Auto Total Auto Trailer Parking Trailer Parking Building Parking Stalls Stalls Parking Parking Required Provided Provided Provided Required Provided Building 88 4 91 92 13 13 Building 2 79 4 83 83 14 14 Building3 39 2 40 42 3 3 Landscaping Proposed landscaping would cover approximately 91,311 sf of the site. Landscaping would be installed in all areas not devoted to buildings, parking, traffic and specific user requirements, in accordance with the City's Municipal Code Section 17.56.050 and Section 17.82.050 which specify landscape design guidelines. The City's municipal code requires a minimum of 15 percent coverage of landscaping per parcel or project. As shown in Table 1 above, the landscaping for Building 1 and Building 3 would be in excess of the required percentage. Building 2 would have 12.2 percent of the site landscaped, less than the required 15 percent. However, the total landscaping for the project site, inclusive of all three buildings, is 15.0 percent. Construction and Phasing Construction of the proposed project is expected to commence in October 2017 with a construction duration of approximately 9 months and will be completed in one phase. Total grading for the proposed project is estimated to require 40,357 cubic yards (cy) of cut and 40,357 cy of fill; earthwork will balance on -site and no import or export of soils is required. Existing Project Site The project site is located on Assessor Parcel No. (APN) 0210-081-20 and a portion of 0210-081-19. The project site is currently an actively maintained agricultural site that is being cultivated on a temporary basis with small areas of disturbed, ornamental, and developed land present on the periphery/outer boundaries of the site. No native habitat is on the site. There is existing utility access (water, sewer, electricity, gas) to the project site., 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 13 F1—F6 Pg125 ISO.— W iji-bank Glendale Pasadena to Project Site Ranc R,0110 Son Bernardino cucan, aga Fontana Ontano Los Angeles Pomona Rpdland L.re. Linda lip qCw Chino Jurupa Valley • Riverside Downey Moreno Valley ar.., Yorba,mida Fullerton Corona Lakewood rermas Anaheim V Santa Ana Rancho Cucamonga, CA 0 Irvine i !:ngton .leach Coals Me" Newrion Ftpwh Source: Google Maps, 2017 FIGURE 1: Regional Location Map 4th Street and Utica Avenue Kidepo Horn City of Rancho Cucomongo 7n Cr) LO N 00 r — -- - — — --- UTICA-AVENt — — — - — - - -- 1 r FIGURE 3: Site Plan 4th Street and Utica Avenue City of Rancho Cucamonga KimleyoHorn III. Required Permits The City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) is the Lead Agency under CEQA and is responsible for reviewing and approving this Initial Study. As part of the proposed project's implementation, the City will also considerthe following discretionary approvals: • Design Review Tentative Parcel Map Minor Exception(s) Additional permits may be required upon review of construction documents. Other permits required for the proposed project may include, the issuance of encroachment permits for new driveways, sidewalks, and utilities, walls, fences, security and parking area lighting; building permits; and permits for new utility connections. These additional permits are considered ministerial, and thus issuance of these permits would not trigger the need to further comply with CEQA. Development of the proposed project does not require the issuance of any discretionary permits from any other federal, State, or local agency. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 17 F1—F6 Pg129 IV. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ® Biological Resources ❑ Agricultural and Forestry Resources ® Cultural Resources ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Hazards and Hazardous Materials ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ® Transportation/Traffic ® Mandatory Findings of Significance V. Determination On the basis of this evaluation: ® Tribal Cultural Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ® Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ 1 find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothingfurther is required. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, (b) none of the conditions described in Guidelines Section 15162 fora Subsequent EIR or Section 15163 fora Supplemental EIR have occurred and (c) only minor technical changes or additions to the previous environmental documents are necessary. Signature Date Dominick Perez, Associate Planner For: City of Rancho Cucamonga 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 18 F1—F6 Pg130 VI. Environmental Evaluation This section evaluates the potential environmental effects of the proposed project using the environmental checklist from the State CEQA Guidelines as amended. The definitions of the response column headings include: A. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant after the implementation of feasible mitigation measures. B. "Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measure has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." C. "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where the project creates no significant impacts, only Less than Significant Impacts. D. "No Impact" applies where the project does not create an impact in that category. 1. Aesthetics Less Than Potentially Significant Less than Significant with Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic El ® ❑ vista? b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State -designated scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its ❑ surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or El El ® ❑ nighttime views in the area? Discussion a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. The project site is located at an elevation of 1,040 feet above mean sea level (msl) and is relatively flat. The San Gabriel Mountains, located approximately 6 miles to the north of the projectsite, are visible in the distance from the project site. The City's General Plan concludes that scenic vistas in and nearthe City include views of the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains to the north and northeast of the proposed Project. The mountains rise to heights over 6,000 feet msl and would remain partially visible upon buildout of the proposed Project. The proposed Project would comply with the City's Development Code including building separation and setback requirements, which would ensure that buildout of the proposed Project would maintain distant mountain views. Thus, impacts to scenic vistas would be less than significant. There are existing office and industrial uses to the north along Trademark Parkway and Bentley Street; an actively maintained agricultural site that is being cultivated on a temporary 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 19 F1-F6 Pg131 basis is located directly west of the project site, with commercial and industrial office properties located further west across Haven Avenue. Vacant, disturbed land and multi -family residential buildings are located south of the project site across 41h Street, and previously developed, vacant disturbed land is located east of the site, across Utica Avenue. The applicant proposes the construction of three warehouse distribution buildings that would be a maximum of 45 feet, a similar height as buildings in the surrounding area and consistent with planned development for the area. Several industrial buildings, similar to the proposed industrial warehouse buildings, are located within a 1.0-mile radius of the site. Development of the project site would convert vacant land that was previously a vineyard to industrial development. However, this change would not substantially affect the aesthetic nature of the project area because it has no distinguishing visual resources such as natural landforms. The project site and the surrounding area is predominately developed or planned for development with similar uses. Therefore, the change in views of the project site from the surrounding area would not cause a significant impact on a scenic vista. Impacts are less than significant and no mitigation is required. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? No Impact. There are no State or County designated scenic highways proximate to the project site? There are also no historically significant buildings or protected trees on the site. Because the project site is not near a scenic highway, no impacts would occur. No mitigation is required. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would be in a predominately industrial and commercial area of the City mixed with multi -family residences and vacant properties. To the north of the project site, there are commercial and industrial properties similar to the proposed buildings. To the west of the project site, there is an actively maintained agricultural site that is being cultivated on a temporary basis, with commercial and industrial properties located further to the west across Haven Avenue. To the south of the project site (across 4th Street), there is vacant, disturbed land and multi -family residential buildings located within the City of Ontario. To the east of the project site, there is previously developed, vacant disturbed land across Utica Avenue. The project site is adjacent to commercial office, warehouse, retail, industrial, and residential uses and would be primarily consistent with the existing and planned surrounding development. Implementation of the proposed project would alter the visual character of the project site; however, it would not negatively impact or substantially degrade the visual quality of the project site or its surroundings. Construction of the proposed project may create temporary aesthetic nuisances associated with construction activities including grading and construction and the presence of construction debris, equipment, and truck traffic. This visual impact associated with the construction of the proposed project would be characteristic of a typical small construction site. These activities would not result in a substantial degradation to the project site or surrounding area; no valuable aesthetic resources would be destroyed California Department of Transportation. Official Designated Scenic Highways. Available at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/seenic_highways/index.htm. Accessed March 14. 2017. and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 110 F1-F6 Pg132 as a result of construction -related activities. These impacts are temporary in nature and would cease upon construction completion. For these reasons, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on the visual character of the project site and its surroundings; no mitigation is required. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact. Existing industrial and commercial uses proximate to the project site have outdoor lighting associated with buildings. The proposed project would include outdoor lighting on the project site in the parking, loading, and entrance areas which would result in an increase in the existing level of illumination in the area. The proposed Project would comply with Section 17.58 of the Development Code which contains regulations for lighting to balance the security needs for lighting with the City's desire to preserve dark skies and to ensure that Iighttrespass and glare have negligible impact on surrounding properties (especially residential) and roadways. The area surrounding the proposed project site is predominately urbanized. The proposed project would introduce nighttime lighting onto the property. However, there are various sources of nighttime lighting in the area associated with existing warehouse/manufacturing and institutional uses, as well as street lighting along 4th Street, Utica Avenue, Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North. The lightingfor the warehouse distribution buildings would be designed in accordance with the City's Development Code and would comply with all applicable development standards including those found in Section 17.58 of the Development Code. The proposed project would not use building materials (i.e., reflective glass) or lighting that would cause significant glare. Therefore, the introduction of new light sources to the project site and glare impacts would be less than significant. Cumulative Impacts The potential aesthetic impacts related to views and aesthetics are generally site specific. As discussed above, project -related impacts would be less than significant. Lighting and sources of glare, while not always site -specific, would be consistent with the majority of the surrounding urban area and would be used during similar hours as surrounding uses. While the proposed project plus cumulative development would change the appearance of the site and surrounding area, all development projects would be expected to be conditioned to follow applicable local planning and design guidelines as specified in Section 17.58.050 of the City's Municipal Code. Therefore, aesthetic impacts are not expected to be cumulatively considerable and no adverse impacts would occur. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 111 F1-F6 Pg133 2. Agricultural and Forestry Resources Less Than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, includingthe Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or El El El a Williamson Act contract? c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined El El H by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of El El forest land to non -forest use? e. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result ED El in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Discussion A Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Analysis for the 4th and Utica Development was prepared for the proposed project by Kimley-Horn and Associates (December 2016). The report is provided in Appendix A; the results and conclusions of the report are summarized herein. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Less Than Significant Impact. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 112 F1—F6 Pg 134 According to the Department of Conservation California Important Farmland Finder (CIFF), the project site is designated as "Unique Farmland" 2. Unique Farmland is defined as "land which does not meet the criteria for Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance, that has been used for the production of specific high economic value crops at some time during the two update cycles prior to the mapping date. It has the special combination of soil quality, location, growing season, and moisture supply needed to produce sustained high quality and/or high yields of a specific crop when treated and managed according to current farming methods. Examples of such crops may include oranges, olives, avocados, rice, grapes, and cut flowers. It does not include publicly owned lands for which there is an adopted policy preventing agricultural use." Given this Unique Farmland is being converted to a non-agricultural use, a Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) was performed to determine the project's significance with respect to agricultural resources under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). LESA is a term used to define an approach for rating the relative quality of land resources based upon specific measurable features. The formulation of a California Agricultural LESA Model is the result of Senate Bill 850 (Chapter 81-2 /1993), which charges the Resources Agency, in consultation with the Governor's Office of Planning and Research, with developing an amendment to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines concerning agricultural lands. Such an amendment is intended "to provide lead agencies with an optional methodology to ensure that significant effects on the environment of agricultural land conversions are quantitatively and consistently considered in the environmental review process" (Public Resources Code Section 21095). The California Agricultural LESA Model is composed of six different factors. Two Land Evaluation (LE) factors are based upon measures of soil resource quality. Four Site Assessment (SA) factors are dependent on the project's size, water resource availability, surrounding agricultural lands, and surrounding protected resource lands. Each of these factors is separately rated on a 100-point scale. The factors are then weighted relative to one another and combined, resulting in a single numeric score for a given project, with a maximum attainable score of 100 points. This score becomes the basis for a determination of a project's potential significance. This score is compared to established scoring thresholds. The LESA Manual provides detailed instructions on how to utilize the California LESA Model, and includes worksheets for applying the Model to specific projects. The LESA resulted in a total score of 49.53 out of 100 for the project site. The proposed project is only considered to have a significant impact if both the LESA subscores (LE and SA) are greater than or equal to a value of 20. The proposed project subscores were 33.78 (LE) and 15.75 (SA), respectively, meaning the proposed project is not considered to have a significant impact for the conversion of agricultural lands. The proposed project would therefore have a less than significant impact to designated farmland. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. A Williamson Act contract between local governments and private land owners restricts specified parcels of land to agricultural or related open space use in return for a lower property tax assessment. The project site is zoned Industrial Park and is not under a 2 California Department of Conservation, California Important Farmland Finder, http'//maps.conservation.ca.gov/ciff/ciff.htmi. accessed December 4.2016. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 113 F1—F6 Pg135 Williamson Act land conservation contract. Development of the proposed project would not conflict with either existing zoning for agricultural uses or with lands under a Williamson Act Contract. Therefore, no impacts would occur. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? No Impact. The project site is currently an actively maintained agricultural site that is being cultivated on a temporary basis. A portion of the eastern and northern boundaries of the project site are currently used for vehicle access to the agricultural field. There are small areas of disturbed, ornamental, and developed land present on the outer boundaries of the project site. The surrounding area is predominately urbanized. Industrial buildings similar to the proposed industrial buildings are located to the north of the project site. Additional actively maintained agricultural land that is being cultivated on a temporary basis is located directly west of the project site, with additional industrial buildings located further west of the project site, along Haven Avenue. There is also previously developed, vacant disturbed property located to the east of the project site beyond Utica Avenue. A multi -family residential community exists to the south of the project site beyond 4th Street. There are no forest or timberland areas proximate to the project. The project site is not currently zoned for forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned for production. Therefore, improvements planned as part of the proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning or cause rezoning of any such land. Therefore, no impact would result and no mitigation is required. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? No Impact. No forest land occurs within or adjacent to the project site. The project site is zoned for industrial uses. No loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use would occur. Therefore, no impact would occur. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Less Than Significant Impact. As previously noted, the project site does not contain any forest land or land currently used for agricultural production. However, the projectsite is designated as "Unique Farmland" (the Department of Conservation CIFF). A LESA was performed in December 2016 to determine the project's significance with respect to conversion of agricultural land to a non-agricultural use. The LESA determined that there would be no significant impactto agricultural lands with implementation of the project. Cumulative Impacts The proposed project would have a less than significant impact on agricultural and forestry resources. Development of the proposed project would not preclude or hinder existing or future agricultural operations in the surrounding area. Therefore, the proposed project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 114 F1-F6 Pg136 3. Air Quality Less Than significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ El ® El air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality ❑ ❑ ® ❑ violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable El El ® El or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial ❑ ❑ ® El concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial El El Elnumber of people? Discussion The project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD is the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the SoCAB, which includes all of Orange County and the urbanized portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. The SCAQMD develops rules and regulations; establishes permitting requirements for stationary sources; inspects emissions sources; and enforces such measures through educational programs or fines, when necessary. Air quality impacts were assessed in accordance with methodologies recommended by California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the SCAQMD. Where criteria air pollutant quantification was required, emissions were modeled using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). The attainment status for SoCAB is included in Table 3, South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status by Pollutant and more particularly described in the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment prepared by Michael Baker International (September 2017), attached hereto as Appendix B-1. A Health Risk Assessment was prepared by Michael Baker International (July 2017) for the proposed project and is also attached hereto as Appendix B-2. The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment and the Health Risk Assessment both analyzed a prior version of the project which encompassed a larger building footprint than is included in the current site plan. Accordingly, the impact evaluation in this section is derived from a more conservative analysis of the project. Therefore, impacts from the proposed project would be less than described in this section. Areas that meet ambient air quality standards are classified as attainment areas, while areas that do not meet these standards are classified as nonattainment areas. Areas for which there is insufficient data available are designated unclassified. As shown in the table, the region is designated as a nonattainment area for the federal ozone and PM2.5 standards and is also a nonattainment area for the state standards for state ozone, PMio, and PM2.5 standards. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 115 F1—F6 Pg137 Table 3: South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status by Pollutant Pollutant State Designation Federal Designation Ozone (03) Non -attainment Extreme. Non -attainment Coarse Particulate Matter (PMio) Non -attainment Attainment/Serious Maintenance Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Non -attainment Serious Non -attainment Carbon Monoxide (CO) Attainment Attainment/Maintenance Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Unclassified/Attainment Attainment/Maintenance Sulfur Dioxide (SOz) Unclassified/Attainment Unclassified/Attainment Source: CARB 2016a and US EPA 2017 To determine whether a project would create potential air quality impacts, the City uses SCAQMD Air Quality Thresholds. The screening thresholds for construction and daily operations are shown in Table 4, Screening Threshold for Criteria Pollutants. Table 4: Screening Threshold for Criteria Pollutants Air Pollutant Construction Activities Operations Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) 75 55 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 550 550 Nitrogen Oxides (NO„) 100 55 Sulfur Oxides (SO.) 150 150 Coarse Particulate Matter (PM,o) 150 150 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.$) 55 55 Source: SCAQMD 1993 (PM2.5 threshold adopted June 1, 2007) a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact. The SCAQMD drafted the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The 2016 AQMP establishes a program of rules and regulations directed at reducing air pollutant emissions and achieving state and national air quality standards. The primary purpose of an air quality plan is to bring an area that does not attain federal and State air quality standards into compliance with the requirements of the federal Clean Air Act and California Clean Air Act. In addition, air quality plans are developed to ensure that an area maintains a healthful level of air quality based on the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) and the California ambient air quality standards (CAAQS). 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 116 F1—F6 Pg 138 The SCAQMD's CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency with the AQMP: 1) Whether a project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. 2) Whether a project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the year of project buildout and phase. Construction associated with the proposed project would generate short-term emissions of criteria air pollutants. The criteria pollutants of primary concern within the project area include ozone -precursor pollutants and particulate matter. The construction emissions result from site grading, road paving, and motor vehicle exhaust associated with construction equipment and worker trips. Emissions of airborne particulate matter are largely dependent on the amount of ground disturbance associated with site preparation activities as well as weather conditions and the appropriate application of water. Construction -generated emissions are short term and of temporary duration, lasting only as long as construction activities occur, but would be considered a significant air quality impact if the volume of pollutants generated exceeds the SCAQMD's threshold of significance. The duration of construction activities associated with the proposed project is estimated to last approximately 9 months. Construction -generated emissions associated with the proposed project were calculated using the CARB-approved CalEEMod computer program. As shown in Table 5, Expected Construction -Related Emissions Summary, all criteria pollutant emissions would remain below their respective thresholds. While impacts would be considered less than significant, the proposed project would be subject to SCAQMD Rules 402, 403, and 1113 to further reduce specific construction -related emissions. Table 5: Expected Construction -Related Emissions Summary .Reactive Nitrogen Carbon Sulfur Coarse Fine Year Organic oxide Monoxide Dioxide Particulate Particulate Gases (ROG) (N O„) (CO) (SOz) Matter (PMio) Matter (PMz.$) 2017 lb/day Unmitigated 23.72 68.04 50.69 0.10 6.91 4.28 2018 lb/day 22.74 51.72 47.89 0.10 4.52 3.03 Unmitigated SCAQMD Potentially Significate Impact 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold (lb/day) Exceeds SCAQMD Screening No No No No No No Threshold? Once operational, project -generated emissions would be associated with motor vehicle use and area sources, such as the use of landscape maintenance equipment and architectural coatings. As shown in Table 6, Expected Long -Term Operational Emissions Summary, estimated long-term operationbl emissions attributable to the proposed project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for any criteria air pollutants. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 117 F1-F6 Pg 139 Table 6: Expected Long -Term Operational Emissions Summary Reactive Nitrogen Carbon Sulfur Coarse Fine Year Organic Oxide Monoxide Dioxide Particulate Particulate lases (ROG) (NO,) (CO) (SOz) Matter.(PMzo) Matter (PMzs) Summer Emissions 9.56 35.83 34.02 0.17 10.29 2.93 lb/day Winter Emissions lb/day 9.30 35.94 29.91 0.16 10.30 2.94 SCAQMD Potentially Significate Impact 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold(lb/day) Exceeds SCAQMD Screening No No No No No No Threshold? As shown in Table 5 and Table 6 above, the proposed project would not exceed the short- term construction standards or long-term operational standards. Therefore, the proposed project would not violate any air quality standards and would not have an impact based on criterion 1 above. The AQMP contains air pollutant reduction strategies based on SCAG's latest growth forecasts, which were defined in consultation with local governments and with reference to local general plans. The proposed project is consistent with the land use designation and development density presented in the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and, therefore, would not exceed the population or job growth projections used by the SCAQMD to develop the AQMP. No impact would occur based on criterion 2 above. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Less Than Significant Impact. As described above, the Air Quality Technical Report determined that emissions associated with the construction and operations of the facility would be below the significance thresholds for all pollutants. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not violate an air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. No mitigation is required. c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Less Than Significant Impact. California has 35 specific air districts, which are each responsible for ensuring that the criteria pollutants are below the NAAQS and CAAQS. Air basins that exceed either the NAAQS or the CAAQS for any criteria pollutants for set periods are designated as "non -attainment areas" for that pollutant. The cumulative setting for air quality includes Rancho Cucamonga and the SoCAB. The SoCAB is designated as a nonattainment area for state standards of ozone, PMso, and PM2.5. The Health Risk Assessment (HRA) prepared for the proposed Project notes that Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) was identified as a Toxic Air Contaminant JAC) in 1998. The HRA found that the highest expected annual average diesel PMio emission concentrations resulting from operation of the project (222 daily heavy truck trips) would be 0.001 ug/m3. This level of concentration would be experienced at the northern portion of Building 2 near 4th Street and Utica. Avenue Warehouse Project. 118 F1-F6 Pg140 Bentley Street. The expected annual average diesel PMio emission concentrations at the closest sensitive receptors (residences located to the south of the project site across 4th Street) would be 0.00 pg/m3. The calculations conservatively assume no cleaner technology with lower emissions in future years. Cancer risk calculations are based on 70-, 30-, and 9-year exposure periods. As shown in Table 7, Maximum Operational Health Risk at Project Vicinity Residences, the highest calculated carcinogenic risk as a result of the project is 0.54 per million for 70-year exposure, 0.46 per million for 30-year exposure, and 0.33 per million for 9-year exposure. As shown, impacts related to cancer risk and PM2.5concentrations from heavy trucks would be less than significant at the nearest residences. Table 7: Maximum Operational Health Risk at Project Vicinity Residences Exposure Scenario Maximum Cancer Risk Significance Threshold Exceeds SCAQMD (Risk per Million)'• (Risk per Million) Significance Threshold? 70-Year Exposure 0.54 10 No 30-YearExposure 0.46 10 No 9-Year Exposure 0.33 10 No Notes: 1) Refer to Appendix A of the Health Risk Assessment, Appendix B-2 of this Initial. Study. 2) The maximum cancerriskwould be experienced alongthe northern portion of Building 2 near Bentley. Street. The closest sensitive receptors (residences to the south of the project site across 4th Street) would experience nominal annual average diesel PM10 emission concentrations, and asa result, minimalcancer risk.Therefore, the maximum cancerrisk provided in this table (at the project boundary) is provided for informational purposes. The significance thresholds for TAC exposure also require an evaluation of non -cancer risk stated in terms of a hazard index. An acute or chronic hazard index of 1.0 is considered individually significant. The hazard index is calculated by dividing the acute or chronic exposure by the reference exposure level. The highest maximum chronic and acute hazard index associated with the emissions from the project would be 0.00022 and 0.00579, respectively. Therefore, non -carcinogenic hazards are calculated to be within acceptable limits and a less than significant impact would occur. As described, non -carcinogenic hazards resulting from the proposed project are calculated to be within acceptable limits. Additionally, impacts related to cancer risk and PM10 concentrations from heavy trucks would be less than significant at the nearest residential neighborhoods. Therefore, impacts related to health risk from heavy trucks would be less than significant. Cumulative growth in population and vehicle use could inhibit efforts to improve regional air quality and attain the ambient air quality standards. The SCAQMD's approach to assessing cumulative impacts is based on the AQMP forecasts of attainment of ambient air quality standards in accordance with the requirements of the federal and California Clean Air Acts. The AQMP is designed to assist the region in attaining the applicable state and national ambient air quality standards and is intended to bring the SoCAB into attainment for all criteria pollutants. Since the construction and operational emission calculated for the proposed project do not exceed the applicable SCAQMD daily significance thresholds, the proposed project would be consistent with the AQMP and cumulative impacts would not be significant. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact. Some land uses are considered more sensitive to air pollution than others due to the types of population groups or activities involved. Sensitive population groups include children, the elderly, the acutely ill, and the chronically ill. Residential areas are considered to be sensitive 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 119 F1-F6 Pg141 receptors to air pollution because residents (including children and elderly) tend to be at home for extended periods of time, resulting in sustained exposure to any pollutants present. The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are the apartments located 165 feet (50 meters) to the south of the project site. In order to identify impacts to sensitive receptors, the SCAQMD recommends addressing Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) for construction. LSTs were developed by SCAQMD to assist lead agencies in analyzing localized impacts associated with individual projects. Since CalEEMod calculates construction emissions based on the number of equipment hours and the maximum daily soil disturbance activity possible for each piece of equipment, Table 8, Construction Equipment Grading Rates, is used to determine the maximum daily disturbed acreage for comparison to LSTs. Table 8: Construction Equipment Grading Rates Construction Phase Equipment Type Equipment Quantity Acres Graded per 8-Hour Day Operating Hours per Day Acres Graded per Day. Crawler Tractor 4 0.5 8 2 Graders 1 0.5 8 0.5 Grading Rubber -Tired Dozers 1 0.5 8 0.5 Scrapers 2 1.0 8 2 Total Acres Graded Per Day 5 Project construction is anticipated to disturb a maximum of 5 acres in a single day. SCAQMD produced look -up tables for projects that disturb areas less than or equal to 5 acres in size. LST thresholds are provided for distances to sensitive receptors of 25, 50, 100, 200, and 500 meters. LSTs for receptors located at 50 meters were utilized in this analysis to match the distance to the apartments south of the project site. The project site is located within the Southwest San Bernardino Valley source receptor area (SRA 33). Table 9, Expected Localized Significance of Construction -Related Emissions, presents the results of localized emissions during construction activity. As shown in the table, the project's emissions on the peak day of construction would not result in significant concentrations of pollutants at nearby sensitive receptors. Therefore, significant impacts would not occur concerning LSTs during construction activities. 4th Street and Utica Avenue F1-F6 Pg142 Table 9: Expected Localized Significance of Construction -Related Emissions Carbon Activity Nitrogen Monoxi- de Coarse Particulate' Fine Particulate Oxide (NO.): (CO) Matter(PMro) Matter (PMns) Grading (2017) 67.94 38.78 6.76 4.24 Building Construction, Paving, and Architectural Coatings 49.46 35.08 3.12 2.92 (2017) Building Construction, Paving, and Architectural Coatings 42.92 34.23 2.61 2.44 (2018) SCAQMD Potentially Significate Impact Threshold (lb/day) 269 2,611 40 11 Exceeds SCAQMD Screening Threshold? No No No No According to the SCAQMD localized significant threshold methodology, LSTs would apply to the operational phase of a proposed project only if the project includes stationary sources or attracts mobile sources that may spend long periods queuing and idling at the site (e.g. warehouse or transfer facilities). Since the proposed project is a warehouse, the operational phase LST protocol is conservatively applied to both the area source and all of the mobile source emissions. Similar to the construction phase, LSTs for receptors located at 50 meters for SRA 33 were utilized in the analysis. The 5-acre LST threshold was used as a more conservative approach since it discounts the dispersion factor inherent with a bigger site. The LST analysis only includes on -site sources; however, the CalEEMod model outputs do not separate on- and off -site emissions for mobile sources. For a conservative assessment, the emissions shown in Table 10, Localized Significance of Operational Emissions - Maximum Pounds Per Day, include all on -site project -related stationary sources and 100 percent of the project -related new mobile sources. The is considered conservative as only 5 percent of the project -related new mobile sources would occur on -site per SCAQMD. As shown in the table, maximum daily emissions of the pollutants during operations would not result in significant concentrations at nearby sensitive receptors. Therefore, significant impacts would not occur concerning LSTs during operational activities. Table 10: Localized Significance of Operational Emissions - Maximum Pounds Per Day Activity Nitrogen Carbon - Monoxide Coarse Particulate Fine Particulate Oxide (NO,) (CO) Matter (PMio) Matter (PMss) On -Site Emissions 35.94 29.91 10.30 2.94 SCAQMD Localized Screening 303 2,978 12 3 Threshold (lb/day) adjusted for 5 acres at 50 meters Exceeds SCAQMD Threshold? I No I No No No Carbon Monoxide Hotsoots The significance of localized impacts depends on whether ambient CO levels in the vicinity of the project site are above state and federal CO standards. The SoCAB has been designated as attainment Linder the 1-hour and 8-hour standards. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 121 F1-F6 Pg143 An analysis of CO "hot spots" is needed to determine whether the change in the level of service of an intersection as a result of the proposed project would have the potential to result in exceedances of the CAAQS or NAAQS. It has long been recognized that CO exceedances are caused by vehicular emissions, primarily when vehicles are idling at intersections. The proposed project considered herein would not produce the volume of traffic required to generate a CO hot spot in the context of SCAQMD's 2003 hot spot analysis. As the CO hot spots in SCAQMD's analysis were not experienced atthe Wilshire Boulevard / Veteran Avenue intersection even as it accommodates 100,000 vehicles daily, it can be reasonably inferred that CO hot spots would not be experienced at any vicinity intersection as a result of 1,088 additional vehicle trips attributable to the proposed project as determined in the traffic study prepared for this project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Construction -Related Diesel Particulate Matter Construction -related activities could result in the generation of diesel particulate matter (diesel PM) from the use of off -road diesel equipment required for grading and excavation, paving, and other construction activities. The amount to which the receptors are exposed is the primary factor used to determine health risk. The use of diesel -powered construction equipment would be temporary and variable due to the nature of construction activity, especially considering the short amount of time such equipment is typically within an influential distance that would result in the exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations. Current models and methodologies for conducting health risk assessments are associated with longer -term exposure periods of 9, 30, and 70 years, which do not correlate well with the temporary and highly variable nature of construction activities. Furthermore, construction would be subject to and would comply with California regulations limiting the idling of heavy-duty construction equipment to no more than 5 minutes, further reducing nearby sensitive receptor's exposure to temporary and variable diesel PM emissions. For these reasons, diesel PM generated by construction activities would not be expected to expose sensitive receptors to substantial amounts of air toxics and the proposed project would have a less than significant impact. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? No Impact. The proposed project is a warehouse use and would not include any of the land uses that have been identified by the SCAQMD as odor sources. Therefore, there would be no impacts from the proposed project. Cumulative Impacts No single project is sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of ambient air quality standards. Instead, a project's individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. The SCAQMD developed the operational thresholds of significance based on the level above which a project's individual emissions would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the Basin's existing air quality conditions. Therefore, a project that exceeds the SCAQMD operational thresholds would also be a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative impact. As described in this section, the proposed project's operational emissions would not exceed thresholds. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant cumulative air quality Impacts. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 122 F1—F6 Pg144 4. Biological Resources Less Than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special El ® El species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S.. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, ❑ ❑ regulations or bythe California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, El El Elmarsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling.. hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory ❑ ® El ❑ wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nurserysites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree ❑ ❑ ❑ preservation policy or ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community El El 1-1Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Discussion A Biotic Resources Report was prepared by Rocks Biological Consulting (March 2017). The Biotic Resources Report is included as Appendix C and the results are summarized herein. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the USFWS? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) may list species as threatened or endangered under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) or Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA), respectively. The USFWS can designate critical habitat that identifies specific areas that are essential to the conservation of a listed species. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 123 F1—F6 Pg145 As a part of the Biotic Resources Report prepared for the project, a query of the CDFW's California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) found historical occurrences of two special - status wildlife species within 1 mile of the project site; Delhi Sands flower -loving fly and burrowingowl. The project site does not contain suitable habitat for Delhi Sands flower -loving fly as detailed below. The proposed project has low potential to support burrowing owl as discussed below. The USFWS results included a historical occurrence within 1 mile of the project site of one additional special -status wildlife species, San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus). No suitable alluvial habitat is present on the project site for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat. The proposed project is within the County of San Bernardino's Burrowing Owl Overlay Zone (Biotic Resources Overlay Map, County of San Bernardino 2012). The CNDDB results, habitat assessment, and potential for occurrence for each species are included in Table 11, CNDDB Species Habitat Assessment Results, below. Table 11: CNDDB Species Habitat Assessment Results Species Status Habitat Description Potential to Occur within Project Area Delhi Sands flower -loving fly FE Found in sandy areas composed None. (Rhaphiomidos terminates of Delhi Fine Sands, stabilized by abdominatis) sparse native vegetation. Burrowing owl (Athene SSC Found in grasslands and open Low. cunicularia) scrub from coast to foothills. Strongly associated with California ground squirrel and other fossorial mammal burrows. San Bernardino FE; SSC Found on the gentle slopes of None. kangaroo rat alluvial fans, on flood plains, (Dipodomys along washes, and on adjacent merriami parvus) upland areas, including alluvial sage scrub, coastal sage scrub, and chaparral. Notes: FE: Federally -listed endangered under the Endangered Species Act SSC: Species of Special Concern per the CDFW The project site is currently an actively maintained agricultural site that is being cultivated on a temporary basis with small areas of disturbed, ornamental, and developed land present on the periphery. The soils mapped on the project site are considered potential habitat for the federally endangered Delhi Sands flower -loving fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominatis), however the project site been active agriculture since at least 1938. The project site is disturbed such that no natural habitat remains. Impacts on native vegetation communities or habitats would be less than significant. Delhi Fine Sands are present on the project site according to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soils map for the project site (USDA 2016). The project site is under current agricultural uses and has been highly disturbed from agricultural activities dating back to at least 1938 based on historic aerial imagery. As such, natural, undisturbed Delhi Sands do not occur on the project site and the project site does not contain suitable habitat for Delhi Sands flower -loving fly. On November 29, 2016, the USFWS concurred that there is no Delhi Sands flower-lovingfly suitable habitat on site (evidence of this concurrence is provided in Appendix C). 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 124 F1-F6 Pg146 No burrowing owl individuals or burrowing owl sign was observed on the project site. A California ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi) colony with five marginally suitable burrows for burrowing owl refuge was observed in the northwestern portion of the project site, just south of Trademark Parkway North. California ground squirrel activity on site does create possible locations for burrowing owl refuge, however the burrows present are low -quality and notsuitable for nesting due to the sandy nature of the projectsite. Based on these conditions, the project site has a low potential to support burrowing owl. However, as identified in Mitigation Measure BIO-1, a pre -construction burrowing owl survey is required prior to site disturbance to ensure impacts on burrowing owls are reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 Burrowing Owl Pre -Construction Survey: A qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction presence/absence survey for burrowing owl(s) within 30 days of scheduled site disturbance. Project site disturbance may proceed once the qualified biologist confirms no burrowing owl(s) or sign (molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement) are present on site. If burrowing owl(s) or sign are observed during the pre -construction presence/absence survey, the qualified biologist will monitorthe burrow(s) for up to two weeks to determine if the burrow(s) are occupied. If the burrow(s) are occupied, the qualified biologist will coordinate burrowing owl avoidance and/or passive relocation in conjunction with CDFW. If the qualified biologist confirms at the expiration of the two week period that there is no burrowing owl onsite, construction/site disturbance activities may commence. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. The project site is relatively flat and has previously been disturbed by agricultural activities. There are no native habitats on site. There are no USGS-designated blue line streams or associated jurisdictional features on or immediately surroundingthe project site. No areas of ponded water were observed on site, and no evidence of vernal pools or fairy shrimp habitat was observed on the parcel. The closest waterfeature is a large pond approximately 1.5 miles southwest of the project site within the Cucamonga-Guasti Regional Park. No impacts to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community would occur as a result of the proposed project; no mitigation is required. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. As discussed above in threshold 4.b, the project site does not contain potential jurisdictional features, including federally protected wetlands and other features that carry water. Therefore, no impacts would occur and no mitigation is required. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Wildlife Corridors: The project site is bordered by urban development including roads and Industrial and commercial development and is not suitable as a wildlife movement corridor. Construction of the proposed project would not impact a wildlife corridor. Therefore, there would be no impact to migratory wildlife or corridors and no mitigation is required. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 125 F1—F6 Pg147 Nesting Birds: The project site has the potential to impact active bird nests if vegetation is removed or ground disturbing activities occurduringthe nestingseason (January 15 to August 31). Impacts on nesting birds are prohibited by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code (CFGC). With the implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-2, impacts on nesting birds would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure BIO-2 Nesting Bird Pre -Construction Survey: Vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities should be conducted outside of the nesting season (January 15 to August 31). If these activities occur during nesting season, then a qualified biologist will conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including tree and shrub removal, disking, demolition activities, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the nests depending on the level of activity within the buffer and species detected, and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and thejuvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. Raptor species will have an avoidance buffer of 500 feet and other bird species will have an avoidance buffer of 300 feet. These buffers may be reduced in consultation with the CDFW. If active nests are not identified, vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities may be commenced. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy/ordinance? No Impact. The proposed project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, as the site has been recently disturbed and there are no identified\ biological resources that are subject to such regulation; no impact would occur and no mitigation is required. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The project site is not subject to a conservation plan; no plans have been adopted in the area of the project site. No impact relative to adopted habitat conservation or other approved local, regional or State plans would occur. Cumulative Impacts Mitigation measures have been Identified above (Mitigation Measures BI0-1 and BIO 2) that would serve to reduce the severity of biological impacts. Similar to the proposed project, all cumulative projects would be subject to individual project review and conformance with conservation plans and standard provisions for compliance with state and federal protection laws. Since project -related impacts would be minimized by mitigation and cumulative projects would also be required to follow suit, the cumulative impact from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects, would be expected to be less than significant. Therefore, cumulative impacts would be less than significant. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 126 F1—F6 Pg148 5. Cultural Resources Less Than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 Section 15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource ❑ ❑ ® ❑ pursuant to Section 15064.5? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic ❑ ® ❑ ❑ feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Interred outside of formal cemeteries? Discussion A Cultural Resource Study Findings Memorandum for the 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project was prepared for the proposed project by ASM Affiliates (March 2017). The report is provided in Appendix D; the results and conclusions of the report are summarized herein. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource? No Impact The records search conducted as a part of the Cultural Resource Study provides information about the presence or absence of historic and archaeological resources and previous studies for the project area. The records search included a search of the Sacred Lands File conducted by the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and a records search conducted by the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC). The SCIC search identified 35 previous cultural resource studies that had been conducted within a 1.0-mile radius. None of the studies have been conducted directly within the proposed project area; however, one study was conducted directly adjacent to the project area. This report (Tang 2002) recorded excavations for a gas line along 4w Street directly south of the project site. No resources were observed or recorded during the study. A total of 10 cultural resources have been previously recorded within the 1.0-mile records search radius. All resources are recorded are historic, the majority are at least 0.8 miles from the project site and none are within 0.5 miles of the project site. The resources include a historic district, single family residences, refuse scatters, the Union Pacific railroad and railroad related elements. The historic topographic maps depict no land use or structures on the site from 1897 through 1947. An agricultural land use first appears on the topographical maps in 1955 and appears consistently through 1983. Aerial photos indicate agricultural uses beginning in 1938 and show the continued presence of agriculture and a lack of structures through 2012. At the time of the pedestrian survey on February 9, 2017, the majority of the project site was a maintained agricultural field with planted grape vines. A portion of the project site, north of the agricultural field, was disturbed land which still supports some grape vines and has been invaded by weedy exotic species. A 2-to 3-foot berm was located along the eastern edge of the project site. Concrete pipe elements, broken and unbroken displaced pipes and valves were situated throughout the project site. Based on the condition of the pipes and the 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 127 F1—F6 Pg149 concrete pipe fragments mixed in with the underlying layers of soil, the pipe elements appear to be associated with previous irrigation which has been destroyed over the years. The pedestrian survey also identified a sign in the southeast corner of the project site stating that "This Organic field / is being Farmed / NO Entry / without / Permission / The Historic / Galleano / Winery [logo]". Property records for the project site are not available prior to 1985. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps from 1913-1929 show that the land was undeveloped and archival research indicates that the project site was likely partof a 5,000-acre Guasti Italian Vineyard Company (IVC), one of the first large-scale wine production companies in the Cucamonga Valley. The Guasti IVC amassed approximately 5,000 acres of contiguous land in the Cucamonga Valley between 1883 and 1917 and remained in operation well into the 1950s. Prohibition resulted in some of this land beingsold off to family -owned vineyards, which experienced increased production in the region due to regulations that allowed for small scale family -owned wine production facilities. In 1927, the Galleano family purchased their original 160-acre property, approximately 7 miles south of the project site. In the 1950s the Galleano family purchased additional vineyards north of their ranch, but archival research did not indicate the acreage involved in the land purchases of the1950s. Historic aerials show that development of the surrounding parcels did not occur until the 1980s. The projectsite was owned by the Church of Latter Day Saints from at least 1985 until 1998 and the vineyard was likely not in production during that time. The project site was owned by Property Reserve Inc. dating back to 1998 and the surrounding lands became fully developed in the 2000s. Although the sign identified at the time of the project survey indicated that the project area was part of the "Historic Galleano Winery", it was not a part of the 160-acre parcel purchased and operated bythe Galleano family from their founding in 1927. The Galleano Winery was listed on the National Register on June 22, 2003. The winery is composed of a historic district made up of seven buildings all located at the original ranch site in Mira Loma. The district does not include the vineyards adjacent to the site. The district has a period of significance that begins in 1933 when the winery opened to 1953, a period of 50 years before the nomination was approved. Although the project area may have been associated with a later acquisition to the Galleano Winery, it was not part of its original 160- acre plot of land purchased in 1933, and is not considered a potential contributor to this historic district. The vineyards associated with the project site are not recommended as eligible for the California Register as they alone are not a good representation of the viticulture history of the Cucamonga Valley. Although they were part of a larger group of vineyards that did have a significant role in local and regional history, wineries that include auxiliary buildings such as homesteads or production facilities would be better examples of the Cucamonga viticulture history. No significant individuals were found to be in association with this vineyard. Although the Galleano family may have owned this vineyard at one time, it is not part of their original plot of land and was likely a lateraddition. The vineyard lacks the stylistic features associated with a type, period region or method of construction and was likely constructed by local field hands, not a master or innovator of design. Furthermore, the vineyard is a common type of property and is not likely to yield information related to local or regional history not already available. As such, no historic resources were identified within the project site that would require any further consideration under CEQA; the proposed project would not impact any known historical structures. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 128 F1—F6 Pg150 b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site has been previously disturbed and the surrounding area is predominately urbanized with industrial, commercial and residential uses located in the vicinity of the project site. The project site is not located within San Bernardino County's Cultural Resource Overlay area. No archaeological resources have been recorded on the project site, and due to the level of past disturbance, it is not anticipated that archeological sites would be found. Because the proposed project involves development of a prior vineyard, it is not anticipated that intact subsurface archaeological resources would be encountered during excavation and grading activities. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. No paleontological resources are known to be on or adjacent to the project site. It is assumed that if these resources were located in these areas, they would have been discovered during original or subsequent ground disturbing activities. Should evidence of paleontological resources be encountered during grading and construction, operations would be required to cease, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga and San Bernardino County Museum are required to be contacted for determination of appropriate procedures. Compliance with the City's standard conditions would preclude significant impacts to paleontological resources. While fossils are not expected to be discovered during construction, it is possible that significant fossils could be discovered during excavation activities, even in areas with a low likelihood of occurrence. Fossils encountered during excavation could be inadvertently damaged. If a unique paleontological resource is discovered, the impact to the resource could be substantial. In an effort to reduce any potential impacts to paleontological resources, a qualified paleontologist would monitor the site and would evaluate any potential paleontological discoveries. To reduce this potentially significant impact to a less than significant level, all construction related impacts of fossils or fossil -bearing deposits shall be monitored in accordance with Mitigation Measure CUL-1, to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director. Mitigation Measure CUL-1 Paleontological Monitoring: Priortothe issuance of a grading permit and/or action that would permit project site disturbance (whichever occurs first), the applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department that the applicant has retained a qualified paleontologist to address unanticipated discoveries. The paleontologist shall attend all pre -grading meetings and shall monitor daily grading/construction operations from the commencement of ground disturbance activities to the procurement of certified building pads by the project's civil engineer and geotechnical engineer, as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If previously unidentified paleontological resources are uncovered during site preparation, grading, or excavation, the paleontological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt or divert grading in the immediate area of the discovery and to evaluate the resources. If the paleontologist determines that they are unique paleontological resources as defined by Section 21083.2 of CEQA, then the paleontologist shall conduct additional excavations to avoid impacts to these resources by the development. If they are not "unique" then no further mitigation would be required. Unique cultural resources shall be determined based on the criteria set forth in Section 21083.2 of CEQA. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 129 F1—F6 Pg151 d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is not located within a known or suspected cemetery and there are no known human remains within the project site. However, this does not preclude finding human remains during project -related ground disturbance. In compliance with State regulations, should any human remains be encountered during construction activities, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbances shall occur in the immediate area until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. In addition, in accordance with State and local guidelines, if the Coroner determines the remains to be of a Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours for identification of the most likely descendent of the deceased Native American. Additionally, if the remains are determined to be Native American, the City would work with local Native American representatives to ensure thatthe remains and any associated artifacts are treated in a respectful and dignified manner. Despite the applicable regulatory framework and the relatively low likelihood of discovery, it remains possible that the proposed project would discover human remains during subsurface activities, which could then result in the remains being inadvertently damaged. To reduce this potentially significant impact to a less than significant level, all construction related impacts of human remains shall be monitored in accordance with Mitigation Measure CUL-2 and to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director. Mitigation Measure CUL-2 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, or any permit authorizing ground disturbance, the project applicant shall, to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director, demonstrate that the following note is included on any grading plans: If human skeletal remains are uncovered during construction, the contractor (depending on the project component) shall immediately halt work within 50 feet of the find, contact the San Bernardino County coroner to evaluate the remains, and follow the procedures and protocols set forth in Section 15064.5(e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the County Coroner shall contact the NAHC, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the contractor shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the contractor has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (California Public Resources Code Section 5097,98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Cumulative Impacts The proposed project would result in no impacts to historical, known archaeological or paleontological resources, or known human remains. The chances of cumulative impacts occurring as a result of project implementation plus implementation of other projects in the region is not likely since proposed projects would be subject to individual project -level environmental review. Since there would be no project -related impacts and due to existing laws and regulations in place to protect cultural resources and prevent significant impact to paleontological resources, the potential incremental effects of the proposed project would not be cumulatively considerable. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 130 F1—F6 Pg152 6. Geology and Soils Less Than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, Including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: I. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other ❑ ❑ M ❑ substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ M ❑ iii. Seismic -related ground failure, including El ❑ ® ❑ liquefaction? iv. Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of ❑ El ® Eltopsoil? c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site ❑ ❑ M ❑ landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1s- 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating ❑ ❑ ® ❑ substantial risks to life or property? e. Have soils Incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water El El Eldisposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Discussion A Geotechnical Investigation was prepared for the proposed project by Southern California Geotechnical (October 2016). The report is provided in Appendix E; the results and conclusions of the report are summarized herein. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving. i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Less Than Significant Impact. The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act (Act) was passed in 1972 to address the hazard of surface faulting to structures for human occupancy. The Act's main purpose 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 131 F1-F6 Pg153 is to prevent the construction of buildings used for human occupancy on the surface trace of active faults. The Act requires the State Geologist to establish regulatory zones, known as "Alquist-Priolo (AP) Earthquake Fault Zones" around the surface traces of active faults and to issue appropriate maps. If an active fault is found, a structure for human occupancy cannot be placed over the trace of the fault and must be set back from the fault (typically 50 feet). According to the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, the project site is not located within an AP Earthquake Fault Zone. According to the report, there are no known active or potentially active faults trending towards or through the project site and the potential for damage due to direct fault rupture is considered to be low. The possibility of significant fault rupture on the project site is considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is located in an area of high regional seismicity. The Red Hill fault is approximately 3 miles northwest of the project site and the Cucamonga fault is approximately 5.75 miles north of the project site. Ground shaking originating from earthquakes along other active faults in the region is expected to induce lower horizontal accelerations due to smaller anticipated earthquakes and/or greater distances to other faults. The proposed project would be required to be in conformance with the California Building Code (CBC), City regulations, and other applicable standards. Conformance with standard engineering practices and design criteria would reduce the effects of seismic ground shaking to a less than significant level. No mitigation is required. iii. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less than Significant Impact. Liquefaction generally occurs as a "quicksand" type of ground failure caused by strong ground shaking. The primary factors influencing liquefaction potential include groundwater, soil type, relative density of the sandy soils, confining pressure, and the intensity and duration of ground shaking. The California Geological Survey (CGS) has not yet conducted seismic hazard mapping in the area of the project site. The San Bernardino County Geologic Hazard Overlay Map does not include the project site within a liquefaction susceptibility area. In addition, the subsurface conditions at the boring locations are not considered to be conducive to liquefaction. Based on the mapping performed by San Bernardino County and the conditions encountered at the boring locations, adverse impacts due to the risk of liquefaction are less than significant. iv. Landslides? No Impact. Landslides are mass movements of the ground that include rock falls, relatively shallow slumping and sliding of soil, and deeper rotational or transitional movement of soil or rock. The project site is relatively flat and, according to the San Bernardino County Geologic Hazard Overlay Map, is not located within an area susceptible to landslides. Therefore, there would be no impact from landslides on the proposed project and no mitigation is required. b) Result insubstantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact. Grading during the construction phase of the proposed project would displace soils and temporarily increase the potential for soils to be subject to wind and water erosion. However, erosion and loss of topsoil can be controlled using standard construction practices. With adherence to the applicable practices and regulations, impacts would be considered less than significant and no mitigation is required. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 132 F1—F6 Pg154 c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is not identified as being located on a geologic unit or soil that has been identified as being unstable or having the potential to result on -site or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. The Geotechnical Investigation forthe project site found impacts due to liquefaction to be less than significant and there would be no impacts from landslides because the project site is flat. The project site consists of native alluvial soils. The proposed Project would be required to comply with the City's Standard Conditions of Approval, which includes adherence to the recommendations provided by the Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the proposed Project. The Geotechnical Investigation includes recommendations to ensure that soils are appropriate for development. Therefore, the proposed project would not likely result in landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse and no mitigation is required. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the California Building Code (2013), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would be required to be in conformance with the California Building Code, City regulations, and other applicable standards. Conformance with standard engineering practices, design criteria, and adherence to the recommendations in the Geotechnical Investigation would reduce impacts related to expansive soil potential to a less than significant level. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are notavailable for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. The proposed project would not include the implementation of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Therefore, no impact would occur and no mitigation is required. Cumulative Impacts The potential cumulative impact related to earth and geology is typically site specific. The analysis herein determined that the proposed project would not result in any significant impacts related to landform modification, grading, or the destruction of a geologically significant landform or feature with implementation of mitigation. Moreover, existing State and local laws and regulations are in place to protect people and property from Substantial adverse geological and soils effects, including fault rupture, strong seismic ground shaking, seismic -induced ground failure (including liquefaction), and landslides. Existing laws and regulations also protect people and property from adverse effects related to soil erosion, expansive soils, loss of topsoil, development on an unstable geologic unit or soil type that could result in on- or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse. These existing laws and regulations, along with mitigation assigned to the proposed project, would render potentially adverse geological and soil effects of the proposed project to a level considered less than significant. Moreover, these existing laws and regulations also ensure that past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the Rancho Cucamonga region do not result in substantial adverse geological and soils effects. As a result, the existing legal and regulatory framework would ensure that the incremental geological and soils effects of the proposed project would not result in greater adverse cumulative effects when considered together with the effects of other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the Rancho Cucamonga region. The impacts of the proposed project -related to geology and soils would be less than cumulatively considerable. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 133 F1—F6 Pg 155 7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Less Than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on ❑ ❑ ® ❑ the environment? b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the ❑ ❑ © ❑ emissions of greenhouse gases? An Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment was prepared by Michael Baker International (September 2017) to assess the potential air quality and greenhouse gas emission impacts of the proposed project. The findings of the report are summarized in this Initial Study; the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment is provided as Appendix B-1. The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment analyzed a prior version of the project which encompassed a larger building footprint than is included in the current site plan. Accordingly, the impact evaluation in this section is derived from a more conservative analysis of the project. Therefore, impacts from the proposed project would be less than described in this section. Discussion Certain gases in the earth's atmosphere, classified as greenhouse gases (GHGs), play a critical role in determining the earth's surface temperature. Emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with transportation, industrial/manufacturing, utility, residential, commercial, and agricultural emissions sectors. California is a significant emitter of CO2e in the world. The State of California has adopted various administrative initiatives and legislation relating to climate change, much of which set aggressive goals for GHG emissions reductions statewide. The SCAQMD has formed a GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group to provide guidance to local lead agencies on determining significance for GHG emissions in their CEQA documents. For all industrial projects, the SCAQMD is proposing a screening threshold of 10,000 MTCO2eq per year. SCAQMD concluded that projects with emissions less than the screening threshold would not result in a significant cumulative impact. As the proposed project involves the construction of a new warehouse, the 10,000 MTCO2eq per year industrial screening threshold has been selected as the significance threshold. a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less than Significant Impact. A GHG analysis (included herein as Appendix B-1) of the proposed project was performed based on guidance from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Greenhouse gas -related emissions were modeled using the California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod). The proposed project would result in direct emissions of GHGs from construction. The approximate quantity of daily GHG emissions generated by construction equipment utilized to build the proposed project. Project construction would result in the generation of approximately 815 metric tons of CO2e. Projected GHGs from construction have been quantified and amortized over the life of the proposed project (30 years). The amortized construction emissions are added the annual average operational emissions. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 134 F1—F6 Pg156 Once construction is completed the proposed project would generate GHG emissions from daily operations which would include sources such as Area Source, Energy, Mobile, Solid waste and Water uses. Area Sources include usage of fireplaces, consumer products, landscaping and architectural coatings as part of regular maintenance. For the proposed project, very few area source emissions are expected from consumer sources since nobody will be living onsite. Energy sources would be from uses such as electricity and natural gas. Solid waste generated in the form of trash is also considered as decomposition of organic material breaks down to form GHGs. GHGs from water are also indirectly generated through the conveyance of the resource via pumping throughout the state and as necessary for wastewater treatment. Finally, the proposed project would also generate air quality emissions and GHG through the use of carbon fuel burning vehicles for transportation. A summary of the project GHG emissions is shown in Table 12, Total Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Annual), below. Table 12: Total Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Annual) Emissions Source Total CO2e (Metric Tons per Year) Annual construction -related emissions amortized over 30 years 17 Area Source 0 Energy 294 Mobile 2,678 Waste 145 Water and Wastewater 391 Total 3,525 SCAQMD Industrial Project Threshold 10,000 Exceed SCAQMD Threshold? .No Source: CalEEMod, 2017 As shown in the table, the combined construction and operational activities of the proposed project would ,generate approximately 3,525 MT of CO2e each year which is less than the screening thresholds of 10,000 MT of CO2e established by SCAQMD foran industrial project. Since the proposed project would not exceed these thresholds, the proposed project would not be required to implement mitigation measures to reduce GHG emissions and would have a less than significant impact. b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less than Significant Impact. The Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) establishes GHG emissions goals for automobiles and light -duty trucks for 2020 and 2035 as well as an overall GHG target for the proposed project region consistent with both the target date of Assembly Bill 32 and the post-2020 GHG reduction goals of Executive Orders 5.03.05 and B-30-15. GHG emissions resulting from development -related mobile sources are the most potent source of emissions, and therefore project comparison to the RTP/SCS is an appropriate indicator of whether the proposed project would inhibit the post-2020 GHG reduction goals 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 135 F1—F6 Pg157 promulgated by the State. The proposed project's consistency with the RTP/SCS goals is analyzed in detail in Table 13, Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Consistency. As shown in the table, the proposed project does not conflict with the stated goals of the RTP/SCS and, therefore, would not interfere with SCAG's ability to achieve the region's post-2020 mobile source GHG reduction targets. The project's impact would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Table 13: Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Consistency SCAG Goal Compliance with Goal GOAL 1: Align the plan investments and policies with Not Applicable: This is not a project -specific policy improving regional economic development and and is therefore not applicable. competitiveness. GOAL 2: Maximize mobility and accessibility for all Not Applicable: This is not a transportation people and goods in the region improvement project and is therefore not applicable. GOAL 3: Ensure travel safety and reliability for all Not Applicable: This is not a transportation people and goods in the region. improvement project and is therefore not applicable. GOAL 4: Preserve and ensure a sustainable regional Not Applicable: This is not a transportation transportation system. improvement project and is therefore not applicable. GOAL S: Maximize the productivity of our Not Applicable: This is not a transportation transportation system. improvement project and is therefore not applicable. Consistent: The reduction of energy use, improvement of air quality, and promotion of more environmentally sustainable development are encouraged through the development of alternative GOAL 6: Protect the environment and health of our transportation methods, green design techniques residents by improving air quality and encouraging for buildings, and other energy -reducing active transportation (e.g., bicycling and walking) This development project is required to comply with the provisions of the California Building Energy Efficiency Standards and the Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen). Additionally, the project is adjacent to a bus stop, which will encourage alternative forms of transportation. GOAL 7: Actively encourage and create incentives for Not Applicable: This is not a project -specific policy energy efficiency, where possible. and is therefore not applicable. Goal 8: Encourage land use and growth patterns that Consistent: See response to RTP/SCS Goal 6. facilitate transit and non -motorized transportation. Goal 9: Maximize the security of our transportation Not Applicable: This is not a transportation system through improved system monitoring, rapid improvement project and is therefore not recovery planning, and coordination with other applicable. security agencies. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 136 F1—F6 Pg158 Cumulative Impacts GHG impacts are recognized as exclusively cumulative impacts; there are no non -cumulative GHG emission impacts from a climate change perspective. As discussed above, the project's emissions would be below the SCAQMD's threshold for of 10,000 MT per year of CO2e for an industrial project and would not conflict with applicable plans. Thus, the project's cumulative contribution of GHG emissions would be less than significant. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 137 F1—F6 Pg 159 8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Less Than Significant Potentially with Lessthan Significant Mitigation .Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset El El ® Eland accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste El ❑ within one -quarter mile of an existingor proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a ❑ ❑ ❑ result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use ❑ ❑ ❑ airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for ❑ ❑ ❑ people residing or working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or ❑ ❑ ❑ emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, Injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to ❑ ❑ ❑ urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Discussion A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment dated December 16, 2016 and a Phase II Investigation dated December 19, 2016 were prepared for the proposed project by Avocet Environmental, Inc. and both are provided as Appendix F; the results of both reports are summarized herein. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less Than Significant Impact. Per the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), the project site was used for agricultural purposes, including grape vineyards associated with wine production. Avocet concluded the historical agricultural use was a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC) because of the legal and routine application of organochlorine pesticides. As such, a Phase II Investigation was conducted by Avocet. The intent of the Phase II was to assess onsite 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 138 F1—F6 Pg160 impacts of pesticides in the soil. Soil matrix samples were collected for laboratory analysis. All of the reported organochlodde pesticides in the soil matrix samples were found to be well below the EPA's residential and industrial levels. None of the samples contained detectable arsenic concentrations. Avocetconcluded no mitigation or additional investigation is required. Once the proposed project is constructed, hazardous materials would be limited to those associated with a warehouse/industrial facility. These include cleaners, paints, solvents; and fertilizers and pesticides for site landscaping. Because these materials are used in very limited quantities, theyare notconsidered a hazard to the public. Adherenceto federal, State, and local health and safety requirements regarding these substances would preclude potential impacts. No mitigation is required. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is not anticipated to result in a release of hazardous materials into the environment. The proposed facility would be expected to use limited hazardous materials and substances which would be limited to cleaners, paints, solvents; and fertilizers and pesticides for site landscaping. All materials and substances would be subject to applicable health and safety requirements. A less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. No schools are presently located within 0.25-mile of the project site. The project site is located approximately 0.40-mile northeast of Ontario Center School, a public elementary school, at 835 North Center Avenue in Ontario. Warehouse distribution operations would not be expected to emit or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials. Any future school developed within the surrounding area would be subject to the oversight of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, as required by State law. No impacts would occur and no mitigation is required. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact. The project site is not included on a hazardous sites list compiled pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5 3 In addition, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was prepared for the project site by Avocet in December 2016. According to that report, there was one Recognized Environmental Condition (REC) (as defined by ASTM Practice E 1527- 13) identified in association with the project site that required additional investigation. A Phase II Investigation concluded the REC had no material impact on the site. No significant adverse impacts relative to hazardous materials sites would result with project implementation. No mitigation is required. 3 California. State of. Department of Toxic Substances Control, DTSC's Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List - Site Cleanup (Cortese List). Available at: http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorLese_Listcfm. Accessed: March 21. 2017. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 139 F1-F6 Pg161 e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The proposed project is located approximately 1.3 miles northeast of the LA/Ontario International Airport (ONT). Per the ONT Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), the proposed project is within the boundaries of the ONT Airport Influence Area (AIA). Although included in the AIA, the proposed project is not within the ONT Noise Impact Zone or the ONT Safety Zone. As the project is outside of the ONT Safety Zone, it is not subject to ALUCP occupancy and usage limits. Furthermore, the proposed project is not proposing a land use action which would require execution of the ONT-Inter Agency Notification Process. The proposed project is within the airspace protection zone and is designated as a high terrain zone, which has a maximum allowable height of 70 feet. The approximate height of the three buildings would be 45 feet, thus, the proposed project would comply with the height requirements of the airspace protection zone. Furthermore, the proposed project would be consistent with the surrounding area and would not create a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. No impacts would occur and no mitigation is required. f) For a project within the vicinity of private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The proposed project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip and would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. No impacts would occur and no mitigation is required. g) impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. The proposed project would have no impacts on emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Prevention District provides fire and emergency response service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, The District has adopted "ReadyRC" a disaster preparedness manual. Additionally, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Hazard Mitigation Plan in 2013. No revisions to the adopted Hazard Mitigation Plan or ReadyRC manual would be required as a result of the proposed project. Primary access to all major roads would be maintained during construction of the proposed project. Therefore, no impacts would occur and no mitigation is required. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact. The proposed project would not expose people or structures to a risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. The project site is in a developed urban area and it is not adjacent to any wildland areas. The proposed project is not mapped for high fire risk in the City's Hazard Mitigation Plan. Therefore, no impact would occur in regard to wildland fires and no mitigation is required. Cumulative Impacts The incremental effects of the proposed project related to hazards and hazardous materials, if any, are anticipated to be minimal, and any effectswould be site -specific. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in incremental effects to hazards or hazardous materials that could be compounded or increased when considered togetherwith similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. The proposed project would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts to or from hazards or hazardous materials. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 140 F1—F6 Pg162 9. Hydrology and Water Quality Issues Would the project: a. Violateany water quality standards, or waste discharge requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off - site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or otherflood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Less Than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 141 F1-F6 Pg 163 Discussion Preliminary Hydrology Calculations for the 4th Street and Utica Avenue were prepared for the proposed project by Thienes Engineering (October 2016 revised April 2017) and is provided as Appendix G. A Water Quality Management Plan was prepared for the 4th Street and Utica Avenue development and is provided as Appendix H. The results and conclusions of both reports are summarized herein. a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is currently an actively maintained agricultural site that is being cultivated on a temporary basis with small areas of disturbed, ornamental, and developed land present on the periphery. Most of the project site surface drains southerly to 4th Street, and a smaller portion surface drains to Utica Avenue. Per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan - Revision No. 1 (by L.D. King, dated 1981) and the Utica Avenue as -built storm drain plan (by Klagge Stevens & Associates, dated August 1985), the proposed project drains to Cucamonga Creek Channel via an 8-foot by 3-foot reinforced concrete box (RCB) in Utica Avenue. There are two existing stubs to the Utica Avenue RCB serving the proposed project, a 39-inch pipe at the 42h Street/Utica Avenue intersection and an 18-inch pipe approximately 500 feet north of 4th Street. The existing Utica Avenue RCB was designed for 25-year storm event. The proposed onsite storm drain will discharge 25-year storm event runoff (or less) to the Utica Avenue RCB, while the difference between 25-year and 100-year runoff will be detained onsite. Building 3, its northerly truck yard, south-easterly parking lot, the landscape area northeast of Building 2, parking lot east of Building 2, and an offsite portion of the north- westerly entry driveway drain to catch basins in the truck yard and parking lots. The inlets convey runoff to an underground infiltration chambers and then the 25-year runoff is then conveyed easterly with proposed onsite storm drain to the existing 18- inch stub to the Utica Avenue RCB. Buildings 1 and 2, the truck yards between the buildings, the easterly, westerly and southerly parking lots drain to catch basins in the truck yards and parking lots. The inlets convey runoff to an underground infiltration chambers and then the 25-year runoff is conveyed to the existing 39-inch stub of the Utica, Avenue RCB. The infiltration chamberswill meetthe Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's MS4 Permit Requirements and therefore, impacts to water quality as a result of the proposed project would be less than significant. The 85th Percentile storm will infiltrate, flows greater than the 25-year event will be detained and then will drain directly to the onsite storm drain system that conveys runoff to the 8 feet x 3 feet RCB. To minimize water quality impacts during construction of the proposed project, construction activities would be required to comply with a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) consistent with the General Permit for Stormwater Discharge Associated with Construction Activity (Construction Activity General Permit). The SWPPP would incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) such as gravel bags, silt fence, and fiber rolls. Preparation and implementation of a SWPPP would reduce potential impacts to water quality during construction to a less than significant level. No mitigation is required. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? No Impact. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 142 F1—F6 Pg164 The proposed project does not propose to use groundwater. Although the proposed project would result in additional impervious surfaces on site, the proposed project would construct underground infiltration facilities which would detain and treat water prior to discharging into the public storm drain system. Therefore, the proposed project would not significantly impact local groundwater recharge. No impacts would occur in this regard and no mitigation is required. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? No Impact. The proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage patterns of the site or vicinity. The proposed project would continue to drain to the 8-foot by 3-foot RCB in Utica Avenue which coincides with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan. The proposed project proposes to use underground infiltration facilities to treat stormwater runoff prior to discharge into the public storm drain system. The project site does not contain any streams or rivers; therefore, none would be altered by the proposed project. Therefore, no impact would occur and no mitigation is required. d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to response V.9(c) above. The proposed project would not substantially alter existing drainage patterns of the site or project vicinity. The proposed project does not include any streams or rivers. On -site surface run-off would be directed to the on -site underground infiltration facilities. The proposed underground infiltration facilities would also minimize the potential for flooding to occur on site or off site. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less Than Significant Impact. Per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan, the proposed project drains to Cucamonga Creek Channel via an 8-foot by 3-foot reinforced concrete box (RCB) in Utica Avenue. The existing Utica Avenue RCB was designed for 25-year storm event. The proposed onsite storm drain will discharge 25-year runoff to the Utica Avenue RCB, while the difference between 25-year and 100-year runoff will be detained onsite. The underground infiltration facilities are designed to infiltrate and treat the water quality flow. Low flows are directed to underground infiltration facilities to infiltrate stormwater pollutants prior to discharging the site. This design decreases runoff volume and pollutants compared to existing conditions. The proposed project would be required to prepare a SWPPP under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Permit to implement BMPs to minimize stormwater runoff during construction. Adherence with the recommendations of the Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the proposed project, and preparation of a SWPPP would reduce possible impacts related to the stormwater drainage system to less than significant. No mitigation is required. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 143 F1—F6 Pg 165 f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Less Than Significant Impact. Water quality impacts other than those described in Response V.9(a) above are not anticipated with implementation of the proposed project. Impacts resultingfrom the proposed project would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. The proposed project is not within a 100-year floodplain and does not propose housing. Therefore, no flood -related impacts would occur in this regard and no mitigation is required. h) Place within a 100 year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? No Impact. The proposed project is not within a 100-year floodplain. Therefore, no flood -related impacts would occur in this regard and no mitigation is required. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? No Impact. The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (2010) Flood Hazard Zones shows that the proposed project is outside of the 0.2 percent annual chance of flood hazard. The closest levee to the proposed project is 1.7 miles west of the project site at Canyon Channel. Furthermore, the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EIR (2010) Dam Inundation Hazards, shows that the proposed Project site is not included in any of the Dam Inundation Areas that impact the City, including the San Antonio Dam Inundation Area. Implementation actions related to Goal PS-7.1, PS-7.2, and PS-7.4 of the City's General Plan ensure that the City will continue to collect flood control fees as a part of the development permitting process, which would fund the City's efforts to upgrade and expand the flood control system and maintain structural and operational integrity of essential public facilities in the event of a flooding hazard, as well as locate new essential public facilities outside of flood hazard zones. Therefore, no impact would occur as a result of a failure of a levee or dam and no mitigation is required. j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? No Impact. The proposed project is located approximately 40 miles east of the Pacific Ocean. There is no risk of exposure to inundation by seiche or tsunami. The proposed project is relatively flat so the potential for a mudflow is unlikely. Therefore, no impact would occur and no mitigation is required. Cumulative Impacts The potential impacts related to hydrology and storm water runoff are typically site specific and site specific BMPs are implemented atthe proposed project level. The analysis above determined thatthe implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant impacts. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact under most hydrology criteria, and therefore could not contribute toward a cumulative impact. In regards to proposed project impacts that would be considered less than significant, such impacts are not expected to result in compounded or increased impacts when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects, as other projects would be subject to similar laws and requirements regarding hydrology practices. Potential impacts are considered less than cumulative considerable. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 144 F1—F6 Pg166 10. Land Use and Planning Less Than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Physically divide an established community? El ❑ El E b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the El El El 0 general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Discussion a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact. An example of a project that has the potential to divide an established community includes the construction of a new freeway or highway through an established neighborhood. The proposed project does not include the construction of public roads, structures, or other improvements that would physically divide orseparate neighborhoods within the established community. The proposed project would be located on a site in an urban area surrounded by a majority of developments with similar uses. The proposed project would generally blend in with the mix of surrounding uses and would not physically divide an established community. Therefore, no impacts would occur and no mitigation is required. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Impact. The City's General Plan land use designation forthe project site is Industrial Park. The current zoning for the parcel is Industrial Park (IP) District The IP designation allows for light and medium wholesale, storage and distribution uses. The proposed project is consistent with these land use and zoning designations. The proposed project is located approximately 1.3 miles northeast of the LA/Ontario International Airport (ONT). Per the ONT Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), the proposed project is within the boundaries of the ONT Airport Influence Area (AIA). Although included in the AIA, the proposed project is not within the ONT Noise Impact Zone or the ONT Safety Zone. As the proposed project is outside of the ONT Safety Zone, it is not subject to ALUCP occupancy and usage limits. Furthermore, the proposed project is not proposing a land use action which would require execution of the ONT- Inter Agency Notification Process. The proposed project is within the airspace protection zone and is designated as a high terrain zone, which has a maximum allowable height of 70 feet. The approximate height of the three buildings would be 45 feet, thus, the proposed project would comply with the height requirements of the airspace protection zone. The proposed project is also within the overflight notification zone which requires compliance with the ONT ALUCP real estate disclosure policy. The proposed project would adhere to all policies 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 145 F1-F6 Pg167 within the ONT ALUCP, and therefore, no impact related to the ONT ALUCP would occur. The proposed project would have no impact on a plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No Impact. The project site is not located within an area designated as a habitat conservation area or subject to a natural community conservation plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict either type of plan. Cumulative Impacts The proposed project does not conflict with any existing land use regulations and therefore could not contribute towards any cumulative impacts. The proposed project does not propose any new roadways or other significant infrastructure improvements that would restrict access or require a diversion for existing travel routes. The proposed project does not result in an impact on any sensitive plant or animal species covered by a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan, nor does it hinder the implementation or establishing of such plans. For these reasons, the proposed project would not cumulatively contribute to land use conflicts and potential impacts are considered less than cumulative considerable. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 146 F1—F6 Pg168 11. Mineral Resources Less Than 'Significant Potentially with Lessthan Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the El El region and the residents of the State? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site ❑ ❑ El El on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Discussion a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? Less Than Significant Impact. Data provided by the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA) Mineral Lands Classification (MLC) maps classify the project site as MRZ-2, defined as an area where adequate information indicates that significant mineral deposits are present or where it is judged that a high likelihood exists for their presence. However, the Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources mapping system (DOGGR) shows no oil, gas, or geothermal resources within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There is one plugged and abandoned dry hole near the intersection of Church Street and Hermosa Avenue. No other exploratory oil wells are present in or near the City and there is no history of oil or gas wells having been drilled within the project site boundary4. As the project site has no known history of mining activity, there would be no loss of a known mineral resource of value to the region or State. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource and no mitigation is required. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is not located in an area that has been identified as a locally important mineral resource recovery site. The project site is zoned for Industrial Park (IP), which does not allow for mineral resource recovery. The proposed project would be consistent with the intended use for the project site; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required. 4 California Department of Conservation. Division of Oil. Gas. and Geothermal Resources_ Available at: https:Hmaps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/ accessed March 8. 2017. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 147 F1-F6 Pg169 Cumulative Impacts The proposed project would not result in direct or indirect permanent or temporary impacts related to mineral resources. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in incremental effects to mineral resources that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. Thus, no cumulative impacts related to mineral resources would occur. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 148 F1—F6 Pg170 12. Noise Less Than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Signifcant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels El E). N El existing without the project? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use ❑ El ❑ airport, would the project expose people residing or working In the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing ❑ ❑ ❑ or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Discussion An Acoustical Analysis was prepared by Michael Baker International (September 2017). The Acoustical Analysis Report is included as Appendix I and the results are summarized herein. The Acoustical Analysis Report analyzed a prior version of the project which encompassed a larger building footprint than is included in the current site plan, Accordingly, the impact evaluation in this section is derived from a more conservative analysis of the project. Therefore, impacts from the proposed project would be less than described in this section. Noise is generally defined as loud, unpleasant, unexpected, or undesired sound that is typically associated with human activity and that interferes with or disrupts normal activities. The human environment is generally characterized by a certain consistent noise level that varies by area. This is called ambient, or background noise. Although exposure to high noise levels has been demonstrated to cause hearing loss, the principal human response to environmental noise is annoyance. The response of individuals to similar noise events is diverse and influenced by the type of noise, perceived importance of the noise and its appropriateness in the setting; time of day and type of activity during which the noise occurs, and sensitivity of the individual. Sound is a physical phenomenon consisting of minute vibrations that travel through a medium, such as air, and are sensed by the human ear. Sound is generally characterized by several variables, including frequency and intensity. Frequency describes the sound's pitch and is measured in cycles per second, or hertz (Hz). Intensity describes the sound's loudness and is 4th Street and Utica Avenue F1-F6 Pg171 measured in decibels (dB). A sound level of 0 dB is approximately the threshold of human hearing and is barely audible under extremely quiet listening conditions. Normal speech has a sound level of approximately 60 dB. Sound levels above about 120 dB begin to be felt inside the human ear as discomfort and eventuallyas pain atstill higher levels. The minimum change in the sound level of individual events that an average human ear can detect is about 3 dB. Decibels are measured using a logarithmic scale; thus, the average person perceives a change in sound level of about 10 dB as a doubling (or halving) of the sound's loudness. This relation holds true for sounds of any loudness. Because community noise fluctuates over time, a single measure called the Equivalent Sound Level (Leq) is often used to describe the time -varying character of community noise. The Leq is the energy -averaged A -weighted sound level during a measured time interval, and is equal to the level of a continuous steady sound containing the same total acoustical energy over the averaging time period as the actual time -varying sound. Another sound measure known as the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is an adjusted average A -weighted sound level for a 24-hour day. It is calculated by adding a 5 dB adjustment to sound levels during evening hours (7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and a 10 dB adjustment to sound levels during nighttime hours (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.). These adjustments compensate for the increased sensitivity to noise during the typically quieter evening and nighttime hours. The CNEL is used by the State of California and the City to evaluate land use compatibility with respect to transportation noise. Existing Noise Environment Rancho Cucamonga is impacted by various noise sources. Mobile sources of noise, especially cars and trucks, are the most common and significant sources of noise in most communities. Other sources of noise are the various land uses throughout the city that generate stationary - source noise. The Ontario International Airport is located less than 2 miles from the projectsite. The project site is currently an actively maintained agricultural site that is being cultivated on a temporary basis with small areas of disturbed, ornamental, and developed land present on the periphery. Additional actively maintained agricultural land that is being cultivated on a temporary basis is located west of the site, with commercial and industrial properties located further west across Haven Avenue. Vacant, disturbed land and multi -family residential buildings are located south of the site across 4th Street within the City of Ontario, and previously developed vacant land is located east of the site, across Utica Avenue. In order to quantify existing ambient noise levels in the project area, Michael Baker International conducted two short-term noise measurements on March 9, 2017. The noise measurement sites were representative of typical existing noise exposure within and immediately adjacent to the project site. The 10-minute measurements were taken between 10:45 and 11:15 a.m. Short-term (Leq) measurements are considered representative of the noise levels throughout the day. The ambient recorded noise levels ranged from 53.2 dBA to 73.7 dBA Leq near the project site. The noise most commonly in the project vicinity is produced by automotive vehicles. Traffic moving along streets and freeways produces a sound level that remains relatively constant and is part of the City's minimum ambient noise level. a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Construction activities would include grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Such activities would require graders, dozers, excavators, scrapers, and tractors during grading; cranes, forklifts, generators, tractors, and welders during building construction; pavers, rollers, and paving equipment during paving; and air compressors 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 150 F1—F6 Pg172 during architectural coating. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve 1 or 2 minutes of full power operation followed by 3 to 4 minutes at lower power settings. Other primary sources of acoustical disturbance would be random incidents, which would last less than one minute (such as dropping large pieces of equipment or the hydraulic movement of machinery lifts). As described in Section 17.66.050(D)(4) of the City's Municipal Code, noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any real property or during authorized seismic surveys, are exempt provided said activities: a. When adjacent to a residential land use, school, church orsimilar type of use, the noise generating activity does not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday ora national holiday, and provided noise levels created do not exceed the noise standard of 65 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line. b. When adjacent toa commercial or industrial use, the noise generating activity does not take place between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday and Sunday, and provided noise levels created do not exceed the noise standards of 70 dBA at the when measured at the adjacent property line. Noise generated by construction equipment, including earth movers, material handlers, and portable generators, can reach high levels. Typical noise levels associated with individual construction equipment are listed in Table 14, Typical Construction Noise Levels. Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 151 F1—F6 Pg173 Table 14: Typical Construction Noise Levels Equipment Typical Noise Level (dBA) at 50 Feet from Source Typical Noise Level (dBA) at loo Feet from Source' Typical Noise Level (dBA) at 165 Feet from Source' Lmaa Ley L. L.q Lmaa L.q Air Compressor 80 76 74 70 70 66 Backhoe/Front End Loader 80 76 74 70 70 66 Compactor (Ground) 80 73 74 67 70 63 Concrete Mixer Truck 85 81 79 75 75 71 Concrete Mixer (Vibratory) 80 73 74 67 70 63 Concrete Pump Truck 82 75 76 69 72 65 Concrete Saw 90 83 84 77 80 73 Crane 85 77 79 71 75 67 Dozer/Grader/Excavator/Scraper 85 81 79 75 75 71 Drill Rig Truck 84 77 78 71 74 67 Generator 82 79 76 73 72 69 Gradall 85 81 79 75 75 71 Hydraulic Break Ram 90 80 84 74 80 70 Jackhammer 85 78 79 72 75 68 Impact Hammer/Hoe Ram (Mounted) 90 83 84 77 80 73 Pavement Scarifier/Roller 85 78 79 72 75 68 Paver 85 82 79 76 75 72 Pneumatic Tools 85 82 79 76 75 72 Pumps 77 74 71 68 67 64 Truck(Dump/Flat Bed) 84 80 78 74 74 70 Note: 1. Calculated using the inverse square law formula for sound attenuation: dBA2 = dBA1+20Log(d1/d2) Where: dBA2 = estimated noise level at receptor; dBA' = reference noise level; dl = reference distance; d2 = approximate receptor location distance Source: FTA 2006 As shown in Table 14,exterior noise levels could affect the nearest existing sensitive receptors in the vicinity. The nearest residences are located approximately 165 feet (50 meters) to the south of the project site, within the City of Ontario. The loudest piece of equipment in Table 14 are a concrete saw or impact hammer/hoe ram (mounted), which are 83 Leq dBA at 50 feet. Since construction noise levels drop off at a rate of about 6 dBA per doubling of distance between the noise source and receptor, the sensitive receptors at the nearest residences would experience noise levels up to 73 Leq dBA. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 152 F1-F6 Pg 174 As noted above, the residential sensitive receptors south of the project site are located in the City of Ontario. As described in Section 5-29.06 of the City of Ontario's Municipal code, noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, demolition, or grading of any real property are exempt from noise standards. Such activities shall instead be subjectto the provisions of Section 5-29.09, which restricts construction to the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. or on Saturday or Sunday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Therefore, with the adherence of permitted construction hours listed in the City of Ontario's Municipal Code, construction of the proposed Project would not exceed the City of Ontario noise standards. However, Section 17.66.050(D)(4)(b) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code prohibits construction noise from exceeding 70 dBA at the property line of adjacent commercial or industrial uses. Commercial uses are located approximately 100 feet north of the project site, along Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway. As depicted in Table 14, construction noise levels located at the property lines of the commercial uses could exceed 70 dBA. Therefore, mitigation would be required to ensure construction noise impacts are reduced to a less than significant level. Noise source control is the most effective method of controlling construction noise. Source controls, which limit noise, are the easiest to oversee on a construction project. Mitigation at the source reduces the problem everywhere, notjust alongone single path or for one receiver. Noise path controls are the second method in controlling noise. Barriers or enclosures can provide a substantial reduction in the nuisance effect in some cases. Path control measures include moving equipment farther away from the receiver; enclosing especially noisy activities or stationary equipment; erecting noise enclosures, barriers, or curtains; and using landscaping as a shield and dissipater. To be effective, a noise enclosure/barrier must physically fit in the available space, must completely break the line of sight between the noise source and the receptors, must be free of degrading holes or gaps, and must not be flanked by nearby reflective surfaces. Noise barriers must be sizable enough to cover the entire noise source, and extend length -wise and vertically as far as feasibly possible to be most effective. The limitingfactor for a noise barrier is not the component of noise transmitted through the material, but rather the amount of noise flanking around and over the barrier. In these cases, the enclosure/barrier system must either be very tall or have some form of roofed enclosure to protect upper -story receptors. The following mitigation is recommended. Mitigation Measure N01-1 Construction Noise Monitoring and Temporary Noise Barriers: Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the adjacent property line. During construction, the applicant shall perform weekly noise level monitoring. The findings of the noise monitoring shall be reported to the Building Official and City Planning Department on a monthly basis; however, the Building Official and City Planning Department must be notified immediately if noise levels exceed 70 dBA per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050. If noise levels exceed 70 dBA at the adjacent property line, construction activities shall be halted, reduced in intensity to a level of compliance, or temporary construction noise barriers shall be used. If temporary construction noise barriers are used, they shall comply with the following criteria or as otherwise approved by the Building Official and City Planning Department: 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 153 F1—F6 Pg175 Temporary construction noise barriers shall be installed and maintained by the construction contractor along the property line such that they block the line of sight between the construction equipment and the adjacent uses. • The temporary construction noise barriers shall be a minimum height of 12 feet high. • The temporary construction noise barriers shall be solid from the ground to the top of the barrier. • The temporary construction noise barriers shall have a weight of at least 2.5 pounds per square foot, which is equivalentto 3/4 inch thick plywood. • To avoid objectionable noise reflections, the source side of the temporary construction noise barrier shall be lined with an acoustic absorption material meeting a noise reduction coefficient rating of 0.70 or greater in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials Test Method C423. Implementation of Mitigation Measure N01-1 would ensure construction noise levels comply with City standards. If necessary, the use of temporary construction barriers would substantially reduce construction -generated noise levels. According to the Federal Highway Administration, noise barriers or enclosures such as that required by Mitigation Measure N01-1 can provide a sound reduction 20 dBA or greater (FHWA 2011), which would be a reduction robust enough to reduce construction noise to levels below the 70 dBA standard. With implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1, construction noise impacts would be less than significant. Since the sensitive receptors in the project vicinity are south of the project site in the City of Ontario, this analysis will use the City of Ontario's noise standards. Section 5-29.04 of the City of Ontario's Municipal Code provides exterior noise standards. The following exterior noise standards in Table 15, City of Ontario Exterior Noise Standards, shall apply to all properties within a designated noise zone. Table 15: City of,Ontario Exterior Noise Standards Allowable Exterior Noise Level Allowed L., Noise Zone Type of Land Use 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. ' I Single -Family Residential 65 dBA 45 dBA II Multi -Family Residential, Mobile Home Parks 65 dBA 50 dBA III Commercial Property 65 dBA 60 dBA IV Residential Portion of Mixed Use 70 dBA 70 dBA V Manufacturing and Industrial, Other Uses 70 dBA 70 dBA Source: City of Ontario Municipal Code, 2016 Section 5-29.05 of the City of Ontario's Municipal Code provides interior noise standards. The following interior noise standards in Table 16, City of Ontario Interior Noise Standards, shall apply to all properties within a designated noise zone. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 154 F1-F6 Pg176 Table 16: City of Ontario Interior Noise Standards Allowable Interior Noise. Level Allowed Ley Noise Zone Type of Land Use 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. I Single -Family Residential 45 dBA 40 dBA II Multi -Family Residential, Mobile Home Parks 45 dBA 40 dBA IV Residential Portion of Mixed Use 45 dBA 40 dBA Source: City of Ontario Municipal Code, 2016 The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are the apartments 165 feet (50 meters) to the south of the project site. Potential stationary noise sources related to long-term operation of residential development in the projectsite would include mechanical equipment. Mechanical equipment (e.g., HVAC equipment) typically generates noise levels of approximately 50-60 dBA at 50 feet. Operation of mechanical equipment would not be anticipated to increase ambient noise levels beyond the acceptable compatible land use noise levels. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less than significant impact related to stationary noise levels. The proposed project would accommodate the need for parking. Traffic associated with parking lots is typically not of sufficient volume to exceed community noise standards, which are based on a time -averaged scale such as the CNEL scale. The instantaneous maximum sound levels generated by a car door slamming, engine starting up, and car pass-bys range from 60 to 63 dBA and may be an annoyance to adjacent noise -sensitive receptors. Conversations in parking areas may also be an annoyance to adjacent sensitive receptors. Sound levels of speech typically range from 33 dBA at 48 feet for normal speech to 50 dBA at 50 feet for very loud speech. It should be noted that parking lot noises are instantaneous noise levels compared to noise standards in the hourly Leq metric, which are averaged over the entire duration of a time period. As a result, actual noise levels overtime resulting from parking lot activities would be far lower than the reference levels previously identified. Parking lot noise would occur within the surface parking lot on -site. It is also noted that parking lot noise occurs at the adjoining uses to the north, east, and west under existing conditions. Parking lot noise would be consistent with the existing noise in the vicinity and would be partially masked by background noise from traffic along 4th Street and Utica Avenue. Noise associated with parking lot activities is not anticipated to exceed the City's Noise Standards during operation. Therefore, noise impacts from parking lots would be less than significant. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Determination: Less Than Significant. Once operational, the project would not be a source of groundborne vibration. Increases in groundborne vibration levels attributable to the proposed project would be primarily associated with short-term construction -related activities. Construction on the project site would have the potential to result in varying degrees of temporary groundborne vibration, depending on the specific construction equipment used and the operations involved. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has published standard vibration velocities for construction equipment operations. In general, the FTA architectural damage criterion for continuous vibrations (i.e., 0.2 inch/second) appears to be conservative. The types of construction vibration impacts include human annoyance and building damage. Human 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 155 F1-F6 Pg177 annoyance occurs when construction vibration rises significantly above the threshold of human perception for extended periods of time. Building damage can be cosmetic or structural. Ordinary buildings that are not particularly fragile would not experience any cosmetic damage (e.g., plaster cracks) at distances beyond 30 feet. This distance can vary substantially depending on the soil composition and underground geological layer between vibration source and receiver. In addition, not all buildings respond similarly to vibration generated by construction equipment. For example, for a building that is constructed with reinforced concrete with no plaster, the FTA guidelines show that a vibration level of up to 0.20 inch per second (in/sec) is considered safe and would not result in any construction vibration damage. Table 17, Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels, lists vibration levels at 25 feet for typical construction equipment. Groundborne vibration generated by construction equipment spreads through the ground and diminishes in magnitude with increases in distance. As indicated in Table 17, based on FTA data, vibration velocities,from typical heavy construction equipment operations that would be used during project construction range from 0.003 to 0.089 inch -per -second peak particle velocity (PPV) at 25 feet from the source of activity. The nearest structures to any of the construction is an office building that is approximately 100 feet away at the nearest. At this distance, vibration velocities from construction equipment would not exceed 0.013 in/sec PPV, which is below the FTA's 0.20 PPV threshold. The nearest sensitive receptors are the residential uses that are 165 feet to the south. At 165 feet, vibration velocities from construction equipment would not exceed 0.005 in/sec PPV, which is also below the FTA's 0.20 PPV threshold. It is also acknowledged that construction activities would occur throughout the project site and would not be concentrated at the point closest to the nearest residential structure. Therefore, vibration impacts associated with the proposed project would be less than significant. Table 17: Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels Peak Particle Velocity at Peak Particle Velocity at Peak Particle Velocity at Equipment 25 Feet (inches per 300 Feet (inches per 165 Feet second) second)' (inches per second)' Large Bulldozer 0.089 0.011 0.005 Caisson Drilling 0.089 0.011 0.005 Loaded Trucks 0.076 0.010 0.004 Rock Breaker 0.059 0.007 0.003 Jackhammer 0.035 0.004 0.002 Small Bulldozer/Tractors 0.003 0.000 0.000 Notes: 1. Calculated using the following formula: PPV equip = PPVref x (25/D)1.5 where: PPV (equip) = the peak particle velocity in in/sec of the equipment adjusted for the distance PPV (ref) = the reference vibration level in in/sec from Table 12-2 of the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines D = the distance from the equipment to the receiver Source: FTA 2006 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 156 F1—F6 Pg178 c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant. Future development generated by the proposed project would result in additional traffic on adjacent roadways, thereby increasing vehicular noise in the vicinity of existing land uses. Based on the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the proposed project, the proposed project would result in approximately 1,088 daily trips. The "2018 Without Project" and "2018 Plus Project" scenarios are compared in Table 18, 2018 Plus Project Traffic Noise Levels. The fleet mix for the 2018 Plus Project scenario was modified to account for the truck trips generated by the project. As shown in the table, noise levels range from 68.3 dBA to 72.5 dBA for 2018 Without the Project. These levels exceed the City's residential noise standards of 60 dBA (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) and 65 dBA (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.). Table 18: 2018 Plus Project Traffic Noise Levels Roadway Segment 2018 Without Project 2018 Plus Project Difference in dBA @ 100 Feet from Roadway Centerline ADT dBA @ 100 Feet from Roadway Centerline ADT dBA @ 100 Feet from Roadway Centerline Haven Avenue North of 0 St 46,380 70.6 47,040 70.6 0 41h St to Concours St 52,055 71.1 53,410 71.3 0.2 Concours St to Inland Empire Blvd 57,305 71.5 58,670 71.7 0.2 Inland Empire Blvd to 1-10 Ramps 72,315 72.5 76,405 72.8 0.3 4`h Street West of Haven Ave 21,120 68.3 21,530 68.4 0.1 Haven Ave to Utica Ave 32,220 70.1 33,260 70.5 0.4 Utica Ave to Cleveland Ave 32,495 70.2 33,445 70.5 0.3 Cleveland Ave to Empire Ct 36,070 70.6 37,070 70.9 0.3 East of Empire Ct 35,610 70.6 36,600 70.9 0.3 Notes: ADT = average daily traffic; dBA = A -weighted decibels To determine significance, a 3 dBA increase was used as a threshold. This level of noise is considered a just -perceivable difference. As shown in Table 18, the noise levels range from 68.4 dBA to 72.8 dBA for 2018 Plus Project. The maximum increase in noise would be 0.4 dBA, which would occur along 4th Street (Haven Avenue to Utica Avenue). Since the proposed project would not increase noise levels above 3 dBA along the roadway segments analyzed, a less than significant impact would occur. d) Substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant. Existing ambient traffic noise levels are documented in Table 19, Existing Traffic Noise Levels. As shown in the table, existing traffic -generated noise levels on project -vicinity roadways currently ranges from 67.2 to 71.1 dBA CNEL. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 157 F1-F6 Pg179 Table 19: Existing Traffic Noise Levels Roadway Segment Existing ADT dBA @.100 Feet from Roadway Centerline Haven Avenue North of 41h St 33,000 69.1 4`h St to Concours St 37,105 69.6 Concours St to Inland Empire Blvd 37,580 69.7 Inland Empire Blvd to 1-10 Ramps 51,865 71.1 4`h Street West of Haven Ave 16,440 67.2 Haven Ave to Utica Ave 22,315 68.5 Utica Ave to Cleveland Ave 22,515 68.6 Cleveland Ave to Empire Ct 24,855 69.0 East of Empire Ct 24,120 68.9 Notes: ADT = average daily traffic; dBA = A -weighted decibels As shown, the existing traffic -generated noise level on project -vicinity roadways currently ranges from 67.2 to 71.1 dBA CNEL. As previously described, CNEL is 24-hour average noise level with a 5 dBA "weighting" during the hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and a 10 dBA "weighting" added to noise during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. to account for noise sensitivity in the evening and nighttime, respectively. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. Ontario International Airport is located approximately 1.3 miles northeast of the project site. A review of the Ontario International Airport (ONT) Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) shows the project site located outside of any noise impact zones. Therefore, there is no impact surrounding the proposed project concerning airport noise. f) For a project within the vicinity of private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The proposed project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip and, therefore, there is no impact surrounding the proposed project concerning airport noise. Cumulative Impacts Cumulative noise impacts would occur primarily as a result of increased traffic on local roadways due to buildout of the proposed project and other projects in the vicinity. A project's contribution to a cumulative traffic noise increase would be considered significant when the combined effect exceeds perception level threshold. The combined effect compares the "cumulative with project" condition to existing conditions. Although there may be a significant noise increase due to the 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 158 F1—F6 Pg180 proposed project in combination with other related projects (combined effects), it must also be demonstrated that the proposed project has an incremental effect. In other words, a significant portion of the noise increase must be due to the proposed project. The following criteria were utilized to evaluate the combined effect of the cumulative noise increase. • Combined Effect. The cumulative with project noise level "Future With Project' would cause a significant cumulative impact if a 3.0 dB increase over existing condition occurs and the resulting noise level exceeds the applicable exterior standard at a sensitive use. Incremental Effect. The "Future With Project' causes a 1.0 dBA increase in noise over the "Future Without Project" noise level. • Asignificant impact would result only if both the combined and incremental effects criteria have been exceeded. Table 20, Cumulative Traffic Noise Levels, lists the traffic noise effects along roadway segments in the project vicinity for existing, Future Without Project, and Future With Project scenarios. As indicated in the table, none of the roadway segments would exceed both the Combined Effect and Incremental Effect criteria. Therefore, the proposed project in combination with cumulative background traffic noise levels would result in a less than significant cumulative impact. Table 20: Cumulative Traffic Noise Levels dBA @ 100 feet from Combined Incremental Roadway Centerline Effect Effect Cumulatively Difference in Difference in dBA Roadway Segment Future Future dBA between between Future Significant Existing Without With Existing and Without Project Impact? Project Project Future With and Future With Project Project Haven Avenue North of 4`h St 69.1 70.6 70.6 1.5 0 No 411 St to Concours St 69.6 71.2 71.3 1.7 0.1 No Concours St to Inland 69.7 71.6 71.7 2.0 0.1 Empire Blvd No Inland Empire Blvd to 1-10 71.1 72.8 72.9 1.8 0.1 No Ramps 4`h Street West of Haven Ave 67.2 68.5 68.5 1.3 0 No Haven Ave to Utica Ave 68.5 70.2 70.5 2.0 0.3 No Utica Ave to Cleveland 68.6 70.2 70.5 1.9 0.3 No Ave Cleveland Ave to Empire 69.0 71.1 71.3 2.3 0.2 No Ct East of Empire Ct 68.9 70.9 71.1 2.2 0.2 No Notes: ADT= average daily traffic; dBA = A -weighted decibels 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 159 F1-F6 Pg181 13. Population and Housing Less Than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, ❑ ❑ ❑ through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement ❑ ❑ ❑ housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people. necessitating the construction of replacement Cl ❑ ❑ housing elsewhere? Discussion a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? No Impact. The project only proposes the development of three warehouse distribution buildings. The warehouse distribution buildings are currently planned as "speculative buildings." Therefore, the future tenant (s) or buyer(s) of the buildings are not known and the future tenant(s) or buyer(s), exact number of future employees, or hours of operation cannot be determined. Therefore, this Initial Study and associated technical reports use anticipated on -site employees, hours of operation, and vehicular traffic generation based on the project's proposed square footage and use as a warehouse distribution development. This Initial Study and the associated technical reports have assumed uses and intensities which may be greater than expected at buildout and operation, resulting in a possible overestimation of impacts. Although development of the facility would create additional job opportunities, it would not substantially induce growth in the area. Unemployment is currently 5.4 percent in the San Bernardino County; within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the unemployment rate is 5.0 percents. Given the need forjobs to meet existing population, and the relatively small number of jobs created on a regional basis, this proposed project is not likely to induce substantial population growth. Roads and infrastructure are already in place to serve the project, and no additional roadway extensions or infrastructure would be required. As the proposed project does not propose new residences or additional roads, there would be no substantial population growth induced by the proposed project. Therefore, implementation of the 5 California Employment Development Department, Monthly Labor Force Data for Cities and Census Designated Places. http://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/geography/Imi-by-geography.html. accessed March 9. 2017. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 160 F1-F6 Pg182 proposed project would not directly or indirectly induce substantial population growth and no mitigation is required. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. The project site is currently an actively maintained agricultural site that is being cultivated on a temporary basis. As the project site does not include housing, the construction of replacement housing would not be required; therefore, no mitigation is required. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. The proposed project would allow for the construction of three warehouse distribution buildings and would not incorporate residential uses. There are currently no residential structures on the project site and therefore, the proposed project would not necessitate the construction of replacement housing. As discussed above in threshold 13.b, the proposed project does not include existing housing; therefore, the proposed project would not facilitate the displacement of residents and no related impact would occur and no mitigation is required. Cumulative Impacts The proposed project would not result in direct or indirect permanent or temporary impacts related to population or housing. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in incremental effects to population and housing that could be compounded or increased when considered togetherwith similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probablefuture projects. As a result, no cumulative impacts related to population and housing would occur. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 161 F1—F6 Pg183 14. Public Services Less Than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Would the project result In substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i. Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ii. Police protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ iii. Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ 123 iv. Parks? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ v. Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion a) Would the project adversely impact: Fire protection? Less Than Significant Impact. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) provides fire protection services for the City. The RCFPD employs over 120 full time and part time employees that serve nearly 170,000 residents in a 50 square mile area. Fire, rescue, emergency medical and hazardous materials incidents are coordinated by an on -duty Battalion Chief supervising cross -trained firefighter/paramedics and firefighter/emergency medical technicians (EMTs) responding from seven fire stations. The RCFPD located closest to the project site is Fire Station 174, located approximately 1.5 miles northeast of the project site at 11297 Jersey Boulevard. Development of the project site as proposed by the project may incrementally increase the demand for fire protection services; however, development would not increase to a substantial level considering the project site's location and surrounding area of similar uses. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. H. Police protection? Less Than Significant Impact. Police protection services would be provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department. The closest sheriff's station is located at 10510 Civic Center Drive in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, approximately 1.75 miles north of the project site. Although new warehouse distribution buildings would be constructed and operate on the project site, the proposed project is in a currently developed area currentlyserved by the County Sheriff's Department. The proposed project is not anticipated to increase response times to the projectsite or surrounding area. As required for a development of this type, the proposed project is subject to a law enforcement development impact fee as imposed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed project does not propose or 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 162 F1-F6 Pg 184 require new or physically altered police protection facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. iii. Schools? No Impact. The proposed project is a non-residential land use. The Cucamonga School District will require development impact fees be paid by the applicant. Upon payment of the required fees, no significant impact to school services or facilities would occur and no mitigation is required. iv. Parks? Less than Significant Impact. The City has established park impact fees to offset the costs associated with increased maintenance and the addition of park facilities resulting from new development. The City's park impact fees are generated based on the number of residential units in either subdivision or non -subdivision developments. The proposed project includes three warehouse distribution buildings and does not have a residential component. As such, the proposed project would not create a significant increased demand or need for the construction of park facilities. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. V. Other public facilities? No Impact. The City requires that certain types of development pay impact fees to compensate for additional services provided by public facilities as a result of implementation of their project. The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires development impact fees for libraries and animal centers; however, the proposed projectwould not be subjectto these impact fees asthey are based on the number of residential units proposed by the development. The proposed project does not include residential uses and would not result in a direct increase in population within the City or surrounding area; therefore, no impacts to other public facilities would occur with project implementation and no mitigation is required. Cumulative Impacts The proposed project would not result in a significant impact to any public services or facilities. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in incremental effects to public services or facilities that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. The proposed project would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts to public services or facilities. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 163 F1—F6 Pg 185 15. Recreation Less Than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial ❑ ❑ ❑ physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of ❑ ❑ Elrecreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Discussion a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? No Impact. The proposed project does not include development of any residences, which could directly generate increased demand for parks and recreational facilities, implementation of the proposed project would not generate an increase in demand on existing public or private parks or other recreational facilities that would either result in or increase physical deterioration of the facility. Furthermore, as the proposed project does not include residential uses, the proposed project would not be subject to a park impact fee. Therefore, no impact would result from the proposed project and no mitigation is required. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. As previously addressed, the proposed project does not include residential development and would not create a significant increased demand or need for the construction of park facilities. The proposed project does not include recreational facilities, nor would it require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no impact would result from the proposed project and no mitigation is required. Cumulative Impacts The proposed project would not result in an increased use of recreational facilities or require construction or expansion of existing recreational facilities. Therefore, no cumulative impacts on recreational facilities would result from project implementation. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 164 F1-F6 Pg186 16. Transportation/Traffic Less Than Significant Potentially. with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the .performance of the circulation system. taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant ❑ ® ❑ ❑ components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections. streets, highways and, freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b. Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures. or other El El ® El established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns. including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in ❑ ❑ location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.. sharp curves or dangerous - ❑ intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ® ❑ f. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit. bicycle, or pedestrian El 11 Elfacilities. or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates (January 2017) to assess the potential traffic impacts of the proposed project. The findings of the TIS are summarized in this Initial Study; the traffic study is provided as Appendix J. The Traffic Impact Study analyzed a prior version of the project which encompassed a larger building footprint than is included in the current site plan. Accordingly, the impact evaluation in this section is derived from a more conservative analysis of the project. Therefore, impacts from the proposed project would be less than described in this section. Discussion a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, Including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The traffic study area was established in consultation with City of Rancho Cucamonga staff through the Scoping Letter Agreement process. The traffic study area includes nine intersections as identified in Table 21, Study Area Intersections, below. Four of the study intersections are shared by both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario. The other five study intersections are controlled by the City of Ontario. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 165 F1—F6 Pg187 Table 21: Study Area Intersections Intersection Control City Haven Avenue at 4th Street Signal Shared Utica Avenue at 4th Street Signal Shared Cleveland Avenue/ Via Asti at 4th Street Signal Shared Empire Court/ Via Turin at 4th Street Signal Shared Milliken Avenue at 4th Street Signal Ontario Haven Avenue at Concours Street Signal Ontario Haven Avenue at Inland Empire Boulevard Signal Ontario Haven Avenue at 1-10 WB Ramps Signal Ontario ` Haven Avenue at 1-10 EB Ramps Signal Ontario r Notes: t Intersection is also a Caltrans intersection Morning and evening peak hour traffic conditions were analyzed forth efollowing scenarios: • Existing Conditions Project Opening Day (2018) Project Opening Day (2018) plus Project • Horizon Year (2038) Horizon Year (2038) plus Project Peak hour intersection operations at signalized and unsignalized intersections were evaluated using the methods prescribed in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2010, consistent with the requirements of the 2016 San Bernardino County CMP. The following describes the roadways within the traffic study area for the proposed project. 4th Street - 4th Street is a six -lane divided roadway through the study area with left -turn lanes at arterial intersections. The posted speed limit along 4th Street is 55 miles per hour (mph) between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue, and 50 mph west of Haven Avenue, as well as east Milliken Avenue. On -street parking is not allowed on the roadway. 4th Street would provide access to the project site via two right -in -right -out driveways. 4th street is designated as a Major Divided Arterial on the City of Ontario Circulation Plan, which would provide six travel lanes with a raised or painted median. Haven Avenue - Haven Avenue is a six -to eight -lane divided roadway through the study area with left -turn lanes at arterial intersections. The posted speed limit along Haven Avenue is 50 mph and on -street parking is not allowed. Haven Avenue is designated as a truck route and as a Major Divided Arterial north of 4th Street, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and an 8- lane Principal Arterial south of 4th Street, in the City of Ontario. Utica Avenue - Utica Avenue is a two-lane undivided roadway through the study area, with left -turn lanes at arterial intersections. On -street parking on Utica Avenue is not allowed. Utica Avenue forms the eastern boundary of the project site, and would provide access to the project site via two full -movement driveways. Utica Avenue falls entirely within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse F1-F6 Pg188 Milliken Avenue - Milliken Avenue is a six- to eight- lane roadway within the study area, with left -turn lanes at arterial intersections. The posted speed limit along Milliken Avenue is 50 mph and on -street parking is not allowed. Milliken Avenue is designated as a truck route and as a Major Divided Arterial north of 4tn Street, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and an S- lane Principal Arterial south of 4t^ Street, in the City of Ontario. Significance Criteria The Level of Service (LOS) standard for the intersections in the City of Ontario is LOS E or better during the morning and evening peak hours. A significant traffic impact would occur when the addition of project -related traffic causes an intersection to change from an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) to a deficient LOS F. The LOS standard for the intersections located wholly or partially in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is LOS D or better. A significant traffic impact would occur when the addition of project -related traffic causes an intersection to change from an acceptable LOS D or better to a deficient LOS E or F; or if the project adds any delay to an intersection already operating at a deficient LOS. Existing Conditions As identified in Table 22, Summary of Intersection Operation Existing Conditions, all traffic study area intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS during both the morning and evening peak hours. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 167 F1-F6 Pg189 Table 22: Summary of Intersection Operation Existing Conditions Int.# Intersection Traffic Control Peak Hour Existing Conditions Delay LOS 1 Haven Avenue at 411 Street S AM 29.3 C PM 38.8 D 2 Utica Avenue at 4"Street S AM 18.9 B PM 21.8 C 3 Cleveland Avenue/ Via Asti at 4`h Street S AM 10.5 B PM 16.9 B 4 Empire Court/ Via Turin at 4" Street S AM 11.6 B PM 16.6 B 5 Milliken Avenue at 4'h Street S AM 36.5 D PM 55.0 D AM 15.9 B 6 Haven Avenue at Concours Street S PM 14.7 B AM 31.4 C 7 Haven Avenue at Inland Empire Boulevard S PM 41.7 D AM 22.9 C 8 Haven Avenue at 1-10 WB Ramps S PM 16.0 B AM 23.9 C 9 Haven Avenue at 1-10 EB Ramps S PM 14.2 B Notes: Bold and shaded values indicate intersections operating at LOS E or F or significant impact to intersection per City standards. At a signalized intersection, delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds per vehicle. Delay values are based on the methodology outlined in the 2010 HCM. S = Signalized Source: Kimley-Horn, 2017. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 168 F1—F6 Pg190 Project Opening Day (2018) Conditions For the purpose of this Initial Study, the project's Opening Year (the year the project would be constructed and occupied) is 2018. Based on consultation with City staff, an ambient growth rate of 1.0 percent per year to Opening Year 2018 was applied to existing traffic volumes. In addition to ambient growth, traffic volumes from area cumulative projects were added to existing volumes. Cumulative Projects consist of any project that has been approved but is not yet constructed/ occupied, and projects that are in various stages of the application and approval process, but have not yet been approved. A summary of Cumulative Projects within the project vicinity and the trip generation associated with each project is provided in Table 23, Summary of Cumulative Projects. Trip Generation, Trip Distribution, and Assignment Trip generation and distribution assumptions for the cumulative projects were derived from approved traffic studies, where available; and were estimated when approved studies were not available. Peak Hour Operating Conditions Ambient growth and Cumulative Project trips were added to existing traffic to develop Project Opening Day (2018) forecasts. The intersection LOS analysis was conducted for the morning and evening peak hours for the Project Opening Day (2018) Conditions. The results are shown on Table 24, Summary of Intersection Operation Project Opening Day (2018). As indicated in the Table, all traffic study area intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable LOS with the addition of ambient growth and area cumulative projects except for the following intersections: Haven Avenue at 4th Street • Milliken Avenue at 4th Street Horizon Year (2038) Conditions Horizon Year (2038) intersection turning movement forecasts were developed from the San Bernardino Transportation Analysis Model (SBTAM) base year 2012 and build -out year 2040 future traffic projections. The forecasts obtained from the model were post -processed by determining the annual growth between the base model year and the future model year, and applying the resulting growth to existing count volumes. There are no programmed improvements in the study area based on the 2012 - 2035 Draft Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan. Peak Hour Operating Conditions The intersection LOS analysis was conducted for the morning and evening peak hours for the Horizon Year (2038) Conditions. The results are shown on Table 25, Summary of Intersection Operation Horizon Year (2038). As indicated in the table, all traffic study area intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable LOS under Horizon Year (2038) Conditions except for the following intersections: • Haven Avenue at 4th Street • Milliken Avenue at 4th Street 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 169 F1-F6 Pg191 Table 23: Summary of Cumulative Projects Project Number Irlation Quantity Unit Trip Generation Wimates AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily In Out Toml In Out Total City of Rancho Oucaman9a I DRC20006-00557—Office Bu lldings 132.897 KSF 1,466 182 25 207 34 164 198 ORC2006-00365- Commercial Center Home Improvement Superstore 67.216 KSF 2,066 57 43 100 77 80 157 2 Fast-food Restaura at w/DT 4.601 KSF 2.283 107 102 2D9 78 72 ISO Medical— Dental Office Building 27.739 KSF 1,002 52 14 66 28 71 99 General Office Building 31.369 KSF 346 43 6 49 8 39 47 3 DRC20067-00696—Industrial/Warehouse 100.000 KSF 975 32 25 57 11 25 36 DRC2013 — 00508— Hotel 4 Business Hotel 126 Roams 916 43 30 73 47 31 78 General Office Bulging 3.000 KSF 33 4 1 5 1 4J72 DRC2015 — W040 — Empire Lakes Apartments 3450 DU 22,943 352 1,408 1,760 1,309 749 5 Shopping Center 315.000 KSF 4,911 68 42 110 205 222 General Office Building 80.DD0 KSF 892 110 35 125 20 99 6 DRC2012-00443-Walmort 189.411 KSF 8.088 113 69 182 337 365 7 DRC2014—W232-Hotel 105 Rooms 859 36 23 59 33 29 B DRC2014-00437— Mixed Use Builtling 102540 NSF 1,131 141 19 ISO 26 127 9 DRC2013-00566— Logistics Builtling 116,490 KSF 812 94 13 IW 14 99 10 DRC2014-01048— Logistics Builtling 161.000 KSF 1,122 130 IB 148 19 137 Northeast Carney Haven at 4^ 11 Hotel 115 Rooms 940 1 39 25 1 64 36 32 1 68 High-Tumaver(Sit-Down) Restaura nt 6.500 KSF 826 39 36 75 43 30 73 Carybf Ontario 12 1 Piemonte 99D 691 1.681 846 1,065 1,911 Total Project Trips 1 51,600 2,632 2,605 5,237 1 3,253 3,440 6,693 Table 24: Summary of Intersection Operation Project Opening Day (2018) Int. # Intersection Traffic Control Peak Hour 2018 Conditions Delay LOS 1 Haven Avenue at 4`h Street S AM 42.4 D PM 75.7 E 2 Utica Avenue at 4`h Street S AM 15.7 B PM 18.2 B 3 Cleveland Avenue/ Via Asti at 4`h Street S AM 16.8 B PM 46.1 D 4 Empire Court/ Via Turin at 4;' Street S AM 10.9 B PM 18.3 B S Milliken Avenue at 41h Street S AM 49.5 D PM 73.1 E AM 18.3 B 6 Haven Avenue at Concours Street S PM 23.3 C 7 Haven Avenue at Inland Empire Boulevard S AM 32.6 C PM 74.9 E AM 33.4 C 8 Haven Avenue at 1-10 WB Ramps S PM 20.9 C AM 41.5 D 9 Haven Avenue at I-10 EB Ramps S PM 37.4 D Notes: Bold and shaded values indicate intersections operating at LOS E or F or significant Impact to intersection per City standards. At a signalized intersection, delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds per vehicle. Delay values are based on the methodology outlined in the 2010 HCM. S = Signalized Source: Kimley-Horn, 2017. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 171 F1—F6 Pg 193 Table 25: Summary of Intersection Operation Horizon Year (2038) Int. # Intersection Traffic Control Peak Hour 2038 Conditions Delay LOS 1 Haven Avenue at 411 Street S AM 39.4 D PM 62.9 E 2 Utica Avenue at 4`h Street S AM 15.6 B PM 17.2 B 3 Cleveland Avenue/ Via Asti at 4°i Street S AM 21.2 C PM 54.3 D 4 Empire Court/ Via Turin at 4`h Street 5 AM 17.8 B PM 29.3 C 5 Milliken Avenue at 4`h Street S AM 47.9 D PM 68.4 E AM 21.8 C 6 Haven Avenue at Concours Street S PM 22.2 C AM 39.5 D 7 Haven Avenue at Inland Empire Boulevard 5 PM 60.1 E AM D 8 Haven Avenue at 1-10 WB Ramps 5 PM 21.1 ,1 C AM 50.6 D 9 Haven Avenue at1-10 EB Ramps 5 PM 32.4 C Notes: Bold and shaded values indicate intersections operating at LOS E or F or significant impact to intersection per City standards. At a signalized intersection, delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds per vehicle. Delay values are based on the methodology outlined in the 2010 HCM. S = Signalized Source: Kimley-Horn, 2017. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 172 F1—F6 Pg194 Project Traffic Project Trip Generation Trip generation estimates for the proposed project are based on daily and peak hourly trip generation rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (9th Edition). ITE trip generation estimates for the project are based on the trip generation rates for ITE Land Use: Warehouse (Land Use 150). The project is estimated to generate 1,425 Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) vehicle trips on a daily basis, with 120 trips in the morning peak hour, and 127 trips in the evening peak hour. The resultingtrip generation estimates forthe proposed projectare summarized on Table 26, Summary of Project Trip Generation 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse. Table 26: Summary of Project Trip Generation 41h Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Trip Generation Rates' ITE land Use ITE Code Unit Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In I Out Total In I Out Total Warehousing 150 KSF 3.560 0.237 10.063 0.300 0.080 10.240 0.320 Project Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Project Land Use Quantity Unit Daily In Out Total In Out Total Warehousing 305.745 KSF 1,088 72 19 91 24 73 97 Passenger Vehicles (79.6%) 866 57 15 72 19 58 77 Trucks (20.4%) 222 15 4 19 5 15 20 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Vehicle Type Daily Veh PCE Factor: Daily In Out Total In Out Total Passenger Vehicles 866(79.6%) 1.0 866 57 15 72 19 58 77 2- Axle Trucks 38 (3.5%) 1.5 57 4 1 5 1 4 5 3-Axle Trucks 50 (4.6%) 2.0 100 7 2 9 2 7 9 4+Axle Trucks 134 (12.3%) 3.0 402 27 7 34 9 27 36 Total Truck PCE Trips 559 38 10 48 12 38 50 Total Project PCE Trips 1,425 95 25 1 120 31 96 127 ' Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trio Generation Manual. 9th Edition Source: Kimley-Horn, 2017. Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution assumptions for the project trips were developed considering the proposed site uses, and the routes to and from the freeway system for the warehouse trucks. Trip distribution assumptions are shown on Figure 10 in the traffic study. Trip distribution percentages at each study intersection were applied to the project trip generation to determine the project trips through each intersection. The resulting project related peak hour trips at the study intersections are shown on Figure 11 in the traffic study. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Projectl 73 F1-F6 Pg195 Future Conditions plus Project Project Opening Day (2018) plus Project As identified on Table 27, Summary of Intersection Operations Project Opening Day (2018) plus Project Conditions, all traffic study area intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable LOS with the addition of the proposed project except the following intersections: Haven Avenue at 4th Street Milliken Avenue at 4th Street Table 27: Summary of Intersection Operations Project Opening Day (2018) plus Project Conditions Int. # Intersection Traffic Control Peak Hour 2018 Conditions 2018 plus Project Conditions Project Impact Sig Impact? Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Haven Avenue at 40 Street S AM 42.4 D 43.2 D 0.8 No PM 75.7 E 79.2 E 3.5 Yes'. 2 Utica Avenue at 4" Street S AM 15.7 B 17.3 B 1.6 No PM 18.2 B 21.9 C 3.7 No 3 Cleveland Avenue/ Via Asti at 4'h Street S AM 16.8 B 17.0 B 0.2 No PM 46.1 D 46.2 D 0.1 No 4 Empire Court/ Via Turin at 4'h Street S AM 10.9 B 11.0 B 0.1 No PM 18.3 B 18.5 B 0.2 No 5 Milliken Avenue at 41h Street S AM 49.5 D 50.0 D 0.5 No PM 73.1 E 73.2 ' E 0.1 -Yes, ._,. AM 18.3 B 18.5 B 0.2 No 6 Haven Avenue at Concours Street S PM 23.3 C 23.5 C 0.2 No 7 Haven Avenue at Inland Empire Boulevard 5 AM 32.6 C 35.1 D 2.5 No PM 74.9 E 75.5 E 0.6 No AM 33.4 C 35.0 C 1.6 No 8 Haven Avenue at 1-10 WB Ramps 5 PM 20.9 C 21.2 C 0.3 No AM 41.5 D 43.0 D 1.5 No 9 Haven Avenue at I-10 EB Ramps S PM 37.4 D 38.1 D 0.7 No Notes: Bold and shaded values Indicate intersections operating at LOS E or F or significant impact to intersection per City standards. At a signalized intersection, delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds per vehicle. Delay values are based on the methodology outlined in the 2010 HCM. S = Signalized Source: Kimley-Horn, 2017. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 174 F1-F6 Pg196 Horizon Year (2038) plus Project As identified on Table 28, Summary of Intersection Operations Project Horizon Year (2038) plus Project Conditions, all traffic study area intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable LOS with the addition of the proposed project except for the following intersections: Haven Avenue at 4th Street Milliken Avenue at 4th Street Table 28: Summary of Intersection Operations Project Horizon Year (2038) plus Project Conditions 2038 2038 plus Project Int. # Intersection Traffic Control Peak Hour conditions Delay LOS Conditions Delay LOS Project Impact Sig Impact? 1 Haven Avenue at 4th Street S 39.4 D 40.5 D 1.1 No 62.9 E 66.9 ''._E,, ` 4.0: - -. - - Yes'_'- -� 2 Utica Avenue at 4" Street S rAM 15.6 B 16.8 B 1.2 No 17.2 B 19.9 B 2.7 No Cleveland Avenue/ Via Asti at 41h 21.2 C 21.4 C 0.2 No 3 Street S 54.3 D 54.6 D 0.3 No 4 Empire Court/ Via Turin at 4th Street 5 AM 17.8 B 17.9 B 0.1 No PM 29.3 C 29.4 C 0.1 No 5 Milliken Avenue at 4`h Street S AM 47.9 D 48.2 D 0.3 No PM 68.4 E 68.4 E, - 0.0 - - Yes. AM 21.8 C 21.9 C 0.1 No 6 Haven Avenue at Concours Street S PM 22.2 C 22.3 C 0.1 No 7 Haven Avenue at Inland Empire Boulevard S AM 39.5 D 39.9 D 0.4 No PM 60.1 E 61.5 E 1.4 No AM 46.7 D 48.9 D 2.2 No 8 Haven Avenue at 1-10 WB Ramps S PM 21.1 C 21.5 C 0.4 No AM 50.6 D 52.6 D 2.0 No 9 Haven Avenue at 1-10 EB Ramps S PM 32.4 C 32.8 C 0.4 No Notes: Bold and shaded values indicate intersections operating at LOS E or F or significant impact to intersection per City standards. At a signalized intersection, delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds per vehicle. Delay values are based on the methodology outlined in the 2010 HCM. S = Signalized Source: Kimley-Horn, 2017. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 175 F1-F6 Pg197 The project related impacts would be considered significant at the following intersections in the Project Opening Day (2018) and Horizon Year (2038) scenarios. Implementation of Mitigation Measures TRAF-1 and TRAF-2 will mitigate the impacts to these intersections to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures TRAF-1 Haven Avenue at 4th Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street to north Haven Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this improvement. TRAF-2 Milliken Avenue at 41h Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 41h Street to north Milliken Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this improvement. b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion/management agency for designated roads or highways? Less Than Significant Impact. The purpose of the Congestion Management Program (CMP) is to develop a coordinated approach to managing and decreasing traffic congestion by linking the various transportation, land use, and air quality planning programs throughout the County, consistent with that of SANBAG. The CMP requires review of substantial individual projects, which might on their own impact the CMP transportation system. Specifically, the CMP Traffic Impact Analysis measures impacts of a project on the CMP Highway System. Compliance with the CMP requirements ensures a city's eligibility to compete for State gas tax funds for local transportation projects. The CMP requires that a Traffic Impact Analysis must include analysis of any CMP arterial monitoring intersection where the proposed project will add 50 or more trips during either the AM or PM weekday peak hour; and any freeway monitoring location where the project will not add 150 or more trips, in either direction, during either the AM or PM peak hour. The proposed project would not add 50 or more trips during either the AM or PM weekday peak hour to a designated CMP intersection; and would not add 150 or more trips to any freeway mainline location, in either direction, during either the AM or PM peak hour. Therefore, the proposed project would not exceed a level of service standard established by the CMP for designated roads or highways. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact. The proposed project would not include any aviation components or structures where height would be an aviation concern. No traffic impacts would occur and no mitigation is required. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Impact. The project site driveways and proposed project improvements would be designed to provide adequate sight distance for drivers entering and exiting the project site. The roadway infrastructure surrounding the project site would be developed and/or expanded consistent with City standards. The proposed project would not introduce any new design features that would create hazards to traffic. No significant impacts would occur and no mitigation is required. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 176 F1—F6 Pg198 e) Result in inadequate emergency access? Less Than Significant Impact. Vehicular access provision for the project site would consist of two right -in -right -out driveways along 4th Street, two full -movement driveways on Utica Avenue and one full -movement driveway on both Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North. Constructed roadways and driveways are required to meet access standards of the San Bernardino City Fire Department. Compliance with the Fire Department requirements would ensure impacts remain less than significant. f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? No Impact. The proposed project has been designed to be consistent with local policies, plans, and programs supporting alternative transportation. The main alternative transportation modes available to the project would be bus transit and bicycle access. Transit service is provided by Omnitrans. Bus stops in the project vicinity are located along 4th Street, Haven Avenue, and Milliken Avenue. Bus Route 61 operates between the City of Fontana and the City of Pomona, traveling through Rancho Cucamonga along 4th Street, Milliken Avenue, and the Ontario Mills Mall in the project vicinity. Bus Route 81 operates between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Chino, traveling along 4th Street, Haven Avenue, Milliken Avenue, and Ontario Mills Mall in the project vicinity. Bus Route 82 operates between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana, traveling along Milliken Avenue and Ontario Mills Mall in the project vicinity. The project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding alternative modes of transportation. No impact would result. Cumulative Impacts The traffic study addresses both the project -specific and the project's contribution to cumulative impacts. The project would have a significant impact to the intersections of 4th Street at Haven Avenue and at Milliken Avenue; however, this impact can be mitigated to a less than significant level. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse F1—F6 Pg199 17. Tribal Cultural Resources Issues Would the project cause substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource. defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site. feature, place. cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape. sacred place. or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe. and that is: a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k). or b. A resource determined by the lead agency. in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence. to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applyingthe criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Discussion Less Than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k) Less Than Significant Impact. b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. A Cultural Resource Study Findings Memorandum was prepared by ASM Affiliates in March 2017 for the proposed project and is provided as Appendix D. As part of the findings process, ASM sent a request to the NAHC to search their Sacred Lands File (SLF) to ascertain whether their files contained any information relating to the presence of Native American cultural resources within the project area. A response letter was received on January 26, 2017 indicating the absence documentation of tribal resources in the project area. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of Native American cultural resources within the proposed project. The Cultural Resource Study Findings Memorandum did note thatthe area that is now Rancho Cucamonga/Ontario was occupied during the Late Prehistoric period by Native Americans commonly known as the. The Gabrielino established large, permanent villages in the fertile lowlands along rivers and streams and in sheltered areas alongthe coast. Seasonal migration was practiced across the area for both the exploitation of resources and based on seasonal weather conditions. Their territory the greater Los Angeles Basin, the coastal regions from Topanga Canyon in the north to perhaps as far south as Aliso Creek, as well as San Clemente, San Nicholas, and Santa Catalina islands. Primarily hunters and gatherers, the Gabrielino 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 178 F1-F6 Pg200 used numerous styles of bows, bedrock mortars, portable mortars, pipes, chisels, metates, manos, and various forms of chipped stone tools. Luiseno and Serrano tribes inhabited the lands near the proposed Project area. At the time of the first contacts with the Spanish in the sixteenth century, the Luiseno inhabited areas to the west of the Gabrielino, including the coastal area of southern California, ranging approximately 50 miles from the southern part of Los Angeles County to the northern part of San Diego County, and inland about 30 miles. Serrano territory encompassed the area east of the Gabrielino, generally across the San Bernardino Mountains. However, the boundaries of their territory are not as reliably defined due to a lack of historic records and a more mobile settlement pattern than the Gabrielino. The territory roughly encompassed the base of the San Bernardino Mountains from the Cajon Pass, north to present-day Victorville, east to Twentynine Palms, and south to the Yucaipa Valley. Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), which took effect July 1, 2015, added new requirements regarding the definition and treatment of "tribal cultural resources" (TCRs) under CEQA. AB 52 requires lead agency consultation with California Native American tribes and consideration of TCRs in the CEQA process. To help determine whether a project may have such an effect, the Public Resources Code (PRC) requires a lead agency to consult with any California Native American tribe that requests consultation and is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a Project. In accordance with Assembly Bill 52, the City contacted the following tribes requesting to be notified of proposed projects. • Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians • G Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians • Gabriel i no/Tongva Nation • Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council • Gabriel ino-To ngva Tribe • Morongo Band of Mission Indians • San Fernando Band of Mission Indians • San Manuel Band of Mission Indians • Serrano Nation of Mission Indians The City received responses from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation. The SMBMI concurred with the findings that the area is low for archaeological sensitivity and requested additional language be included in the document regardingthe potential discovery of tribal cultural resources, human remains or funerary objects. That language is included below as Mitigation Measure TRI-1 and TRI-2. The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation requested additional tribal consultation and it is our understanding that the City reached out to the tribe and made efforts to initiate tribal consultation and is currently trying to identify potential next steps. Mitigation Measures TRI-1 Discovery of Human Remains: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 179 F1-F6 Pg201 TRI-2 Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources: In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. Cumulative Impacts The proposed project would result in less than significant impacts to tribal cultural resources. The chances of cumulative impacts occurring as a result of project implementation plus implementation of other projects in the region is not likely since proposed projects would be subject to individual project -level environmental review. Since there would be no project -related impacts and due to existing laws and regulations in place to protecttribal cultural resources and prevent significant impact to such resources, the potential incremental effects of the proposed project would not be cumulatively considerable. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 180 F146 Pg202 18. Utilities and Service Systems Less Than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a.Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ® El Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of El El 1-1existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing El ❑ Elfacilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources. or El ❑ ® ❑ are new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the El projectes projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste El ❑ ® ❑ disposal needs? g. Comply with. federal. State. and local statutes and F-1 El ® El related to solid waste? Discussion a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Less Than Significant Impact. Wastewater conveyance is handled by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). Wastewater is processed by CVWD and the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA). CVWD is one of eight member agencies that operate under the IEUA. IEUA operates 5 interconnected regional water -recycling facilities that treat approximately 60 million gallons per day (mgd) and have a combined permitted capacity of 84.4 mgd (IEUA NPDES No. CA8000409). Two of five IEUA treatment plants serve development within the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Regional Plant No. 1 (RP-1) and Regional Plant No. 4 (RP-4). At all IEUA treatment plants, wastewater is subject to tertiary -level water treatment, which produces effluent suitable for reuse (e.g. irrigation, wetlands/wildlife habitat, groundwater recharge). Per the General Plan Update Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (2010), the treatment plant RP-1 currently has an average excess capacity of approximately 9 mgd (IEUA NPDES No. CA8000409) and the portion of the City served by RP-1 (the western half and southern third) are the more developed areas of the City; therefore, additional development and redevelopment sufficient to exceed the remaining capacity of RP-1 is not anticipated. Wastewater generation more than RP-1's capacity, though considered unlikely, would be diverted to RP-4. RP-4 provides a current excess capacity of 7.9 mgd and a potential excess capacity of 21.9 mgd. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 181 F1—F6 Pg203 Wastewater generated by the proposed project would not result in an exceedance of any wastewater treatment requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Impacts would be considered less than significant. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana RWQCB and is subject to the waste discharge requirements of the MS4 Permit for San Bernardino and Riverside counties and the proposed permit for San Bernardino County. Stormwater generated by the proposed project would not result in an exceedance of any wastewater treatment requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Impacts would be considered less than significant. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? No Impact. Sewer and water lines are already in place to serve the project, and expansion of existing facilities or construction of new wastewater treatment facilities would not be needed for implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, there would be no impact and no mitigation is required. c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? No Impact. With implementation of the proposed project, the runoff is conveyed with to a set of underground infiltration facilities. Once the design capture volume (DCV) is met, the additional flows would drain to an existing storm drain. The proposed project would not require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. No impacts would result and no mitigation is required. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Less Than Significant Impact. Water supply and distribution in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is served by CVWD. CVWD service area covers approximately 47 square miles (about 30,000 acres) which serves a population of over 186,000 customers with over 45,000 water connections. Per the General Plan Update Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (2010), CVWD has an average daily demand of approximately 50 million gallons per day (gpd). The CVWD's three main sources of water include (1) groundwater, (2) local canyon runoff (surface and subsurface flows) and (3) imported surface water delivered through the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). The 2010 General Plan Update that states: "Based on current analysis, it is anticipatedthat the District will be capable of meeting the water demands for the existing and future 20-year projected planned growth within the District's service area under normal, single -dry and multiple -dry year conditions through imported water supplies from Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), as well as local surface and groundwater supplies and through recycling and water conservation". Therefore, adequate water supplies would be available to serve proposed land use development consistent with the 2010 General Plan Update. e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Less Than Significant Impact. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 182 F1—F6 Pg204 Refer to response V.18(a) and (b) above. The wastewater infrastructure needed to serve the project site is already in place, and the City's wastewater facilities have adequate capacity to serve the project's demand. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Less Than Significant Impact. Solid Waste is provided by City of Rancho Cucamonga and County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Management Division (SWMD). Solid waste collection and transport in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is handled by contracted private firms that haul collected materials to regional landfills and materials recycling facilities. The County of San Bernardino contracted Burrtec to operate and maintain their solid waste disposal facilities located throughout the County. Solid waste generated in the City is transferred to Burrtec's West Valley Materials Recovery Facility (MRF). Solid waste that is not diverted is primarily disposed at Mid -Valley Landfill, a County Class III (i.e., municipal waste) landfill located at 2390 North Alder Avenue in Rialto (Ceballos 2009). Mid -Valley Landfill has a daily permitted capacity of 7,500 tons per day (tons/day), a remaining capacity of 670,000 cubic yards (cy), and an anticipated close date of 2033 (2010 General Plan Update). Landfill capacity is expected to decrease over time with future growth and development throughout San Bernardino County and surrounding Inland Empire areas. Waste reduction and recycling programs and regulations are expected to reduce this demand and extend the life of existing landfills. As discussed earlier, build out of the 2010 General Plan Update would result in an estimated net increase in solid waste disposal of 201.5 tons per day and 73,545 tons per year. This increase would represent approximately 2.7 percent of Mid -Valley Landfill's daily permitted capacity. This nominal incremental increase in solid waste disposal, assuming that all solid waste in the City would be disposed at Mid -Valley Landfill, would not be considered cumulative considerable. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. g) Comply with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to response V.18(f) above. The Mid -Valley Landfill has been constructed to meet all required local, State, and federal statutes and regulations. The proposed project would not compromise the City's compliance with federal, State and local statues and regulations related to solid waste. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Cumulative Impacts The proposed project would have a less than significant impact with respect to utilities/service systems. The proposed projectwould require use of existingwater and wastewater infrastructure, as well as existing, available solid waste disposal for building facility operation. Development of public utility infrastructure is part of an extensive planning process involving utility providers and jurisdictions with discretionary review authority. The coordination process associated with the preparation of development and infrastructure plans is intended to ensure that adequate resources are available to serve both individual projects and cumulative demand for resources and infrastructure as a result of cumulative growth and development in the area. Individual projects are subject to review for utility capacity to avoid unanticipated interruptions in service or inadequate supplies. Coordination with the utility companies would allowforthe provision of utility service to the proposed project and other developments. The proposed project and other planned projects are subject to connection and service fees to assist in facility expansion and service improvements triggered by an increase in demand. Because of the utility planning and coordination activities described above, no significant cumulative utility impacts are anticipated. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 183 F1-176 Pg205 19. Mandatory Findings of Significance Less Than- . Potentially significant Lessthan Significant with Mitigation Significant No . Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment. substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels. threaten to eliminate a plantar ❑ ® ❑ ❑ animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable ❑ ® ❑ ❑ when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects. and the effects of probable future projects)? c. Does the project have environmental effects which will: cause substantial adverse effects on ❑ ❑ ® ❑ human beings. either directly or indirectly? Discussion a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. As described throughout the Initial Study, the proposed project would not result in any significant impacts to the environment that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level through the application of uniformly applied mitigation and development policies and/or standards. The proposed project would be required to implement a range of standard and uniformly applied development policies and standards, as well as implement mitigation measures identified in the analysis herein, which would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. b) Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable (Cumulatively considerable means the projects incremental effects are considerable when compared to the past, present, and future effects of other projects)? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project would result in significant impacts in the following areas: biological resources, cultural resources and traffic. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for each of these environmental issue areas in order to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Standard conditions would also be imposed upon the project. Other new development projects within the City would also be subjectto these requirements. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 184 F1—F6 Pg206 All other impacts of the proposed project were determined either to have no impact or to be less than significant, without the need for mitigation. Cumulatively, the proposed project would not result in any significant impacts that would substantially combine with impacts of other current or probable future impacts. Therefore, the proposed project, in conjunction with other future projects, would not result in any cumulatively considerable impacts. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will have substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in the respective sections, the proposed project would have no potentially significant impacts. Therefore, impacts related to adverse effects on human beings would be less than significant. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 185 F1-176 Pg207 VII. Preparers City of Rancho Cucamonga (Lead Agency) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dominick Perez, Associate Planner Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 401 B Street, Suite 600 San Diego, California 92101 (619) 234-9411 Jennifer Harry, P.E, Project Manager Karina Fidler, AICP, Senior Environmental Planner Casey Schooner, Environmental Planner VIII. References ASM Affiliates, Cultural Resource Study Findings Memorandum for the for the 41^ Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project. March 20V. Avocet Environmental Inc., Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, NW Corner of 4tn Street and Utica Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. December 2016. Avocet Environmental Inc., Phase 11 Investigation NW Corner of 4t^ Street and Utica Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. December 2016. California Standard Specifications, July 1992. California, State of, Department of Conservation. California Important Farmland Finder. Available at: http-.//maps.conservation.ca.gov/ciff/ciff.html. Accessed December 4, 2016. California, State of, Department of Conservation. Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources. Available at: https,.//maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/ accessed March 8, 2017 California, State of, Department of Toxic Substances Control. DTSC's Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List - Site Cleanup (Cortese List). Available at: http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese_List.cfrn. Accessed: February 23, 2017. California, State of, Department of Transportation. Official Designated Scenic Highways. Available at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic_highways/index.htm. Accessed March 14, 2017. California, State of, Employment Development Department, Monthly Labor Force Data for Cities and Census Designated Places, http://www.laborrnarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/geography/imi-by- geography.html, accessed March 9, 2017. City of Ontario, Land Use Plan. January 2010. City of Ontario, Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. April 2011. City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, 2014. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 186 F1—F6 Pg208 T Cl N O City of Rancho Cucamonga 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program SCH No. Design Review No. Tentative Parcel Map No. _ Minor Exceptions No. _ Development Agreement No. Prepared for. City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project Mitigation Monftoring and Reporting Program Introduction................................................................................................................................................................................................................. I Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program....................................................................................................................................................I 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project Mftlgation Monitoringano Reporting Program INTRODUCTION This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). This MMRP has been prepared pursuant to Section 21081.E of the California Public Resources Code which requires public agencies to "adopt a reporting and monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in orderto mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment." An MMRP is required for the proposed project because the IS/MND has identified significant adverse impacts, and measures have been identified to mitigate those impacts. The numbering of the individual mitigation measures follows the numbering sequence as found in the IS/MND. The MMRP, as outlined in the following table, describes mitigation timing, monitoring responsibilities, and compliance verification T responsibility for all mitigation measures identified in the IS/MND. The MMRP is presented in tabularform on the following pages. o The components of the MMRP are described briefly below: v N Mitigation Measures: The mitigation measures are taken verbatim from the Draft IS/MND in the same order that they appear in the IS/MND. • Implementation Timing: Identifies at which stage of the project mitigation must be completed. • Agency Responsible for Monitoring: Identifies the department within the City, project applicant, or consultant responsible for mitigation monitoring. • Monitoring/ Reporting Method: Identifies the compliance method for project mitigation. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project Mitigation Monitcringand Reporting Program Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Agency Responsible for 1°""""""'ig RQp"""'a Mitigation Measures Implementation Timing Monitoring Method Biological Resources BIO-1 Burrowing Owl Pre -Construction Survey: A qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction presence/absence survey for burrowing owl(s) within 30 days of scheduled site disturbance. Project site disturbance may proceed once the qualified biologist confirms no burrowing owl(s) or sign (molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement) are present on site. If burrowing owl(s) or sign are observed during the pre -construction presence/absence survey, the qualified biologist will monitor the burrow(s) for up to two weeks to determine if the burrow(s) are occupied. If the burrow(s) are occupied, the qualified biologist will coordinate burrowing owl avoidance and/or passive relocation in conjunction with CDFW. If the qualified biologist confirms at the expiration of the two -week period that there is no burrowing owl onsite, construction/site disturbance activities may commence. Prior to grading and construction (as needed) City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Compliance with project conditions of approval BIO-2 Prior to grading and City of Rancho Compliance with project Nesting Bird Pre -Construction Survey: Vegetation clearing and ground disturbing construction (as needed) Cucamonga Planning conditions of approval activities should be conducted outside of the nesting season (January 15 to Department August 31). If these activities occur during nesting season, then a qualified biologist will conduct a nesting bird surveywithin three days priorto any disturbance of the site, includingtree and shrub removal, disking, demolition activities, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the nests depending on the level of activity within the buffer and species detected, and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. Raptor species will have an avoidance buffer of 500 feet and other bird species will have an avoidance buffer of 300 feet. These buffers may be reduced in consultation with the CDFW. If active nests are not identified, vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities may be commenced. Cultural Resources CUL-1 Prior to grading and City of Rancho Compliance with project Paleontological Monitoring: Priorto the issuance of a grading permit and/or construction; Ongoing Cucamonga Planning conditions of approval. action that would permit project site disturbance (whichever occurs first), the during grading Department applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department that the applicant has retained a qualified paleontologist to address unanticipated discoveries. The paleontologist shall attend all pre - grading meetings and shall monitor daily grading/construction operations from 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Agency Responsible for momtormgi Keportmg Mitigation Measures Implementation Timing Monitoring Method the commencement of ground disturbance activities to the procurement of certified building pads by the project's civil engineer and geotechnical engineer, as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If previously unidentified paleontological resources are uncovered during site preparation, grading, or excavation, the paleontological monitorshall have the authority to temporarily halt or divert grading in the immediate area of the discovery and to evaluate the resources. If the paleontologist determines that they are unique paleontological resources as defined by Section 21083.2 of CEQA, then the paleontologist shall conduct additional excavations to avoid impacts to these resources by the development. If they are not "unique" then no further mitigation would be required. Unique cultural resources shall be determined based on the criteria set forth in Section 21083.2 of CEQA. CUL-2 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, or any permit authorizing ground T disturbance, the project applicant shall, to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director, demonstrate that the following note is included on any grading plans: -r! If human skeletal remains are uncoveredduringconstruction, the contractor on (depending on the project component) shall immediately halt work within 50 U3 feet of the find, contact the San Bernardino County coroner to evaluate the N remains, and follow the procedures and protocols set forth in Section w 15064.5(e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the County Coroner shall contact the NAHC, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the contractor shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the contractor has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Noise Incorporation of requirement into grading and building plans (plan notes); Ongoing during construction. City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning .Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department Compliance with project conditions of approval. NOI-1 Ongoing during City of Rancho Compliance with project Construction Noise Monitoring and Temporary Noise Barriers: Construction or construction. Cucamonga Planning conditions of approval. grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in City of Rancho Department Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the adjacent City of Rancho property line. During construction, the applicant shall perform weekly noise level Cucamonga Building and 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project Mitigation Monitoringend Reporting Program Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Agency Responsible for Monitoring/ Reporting Mitigation Measures Implementation Timing Monitoring Method monitoring. The findings of the noise monitoring shall be reported to the Safety Services Building Official and City Planning Department on a monthly basis; however, the Department Building Official and City Planning Department must be notified Immediately if noise levels exceed 70 dBA per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050. If noise levels exceed 70 dBA at the adjacent property line, construction activities shall be halted, reduced in intensity to a level of compliance, or temporary construction noise barriers shall be used. If temporary construction noise barriers are used, they shall comply with the following criteria or as otherwise approved by the Building Official and City Planning Department: Temporary construction noise barriers shall be installed and maintained by the construction contractor along the property line such that they block the line of sight between the construction equipment and the adjacent uses. • The temporary construction noise barriers shall be a minimum height of 12 feet high. • The temporary construction noise barriers shall be solid from the ground to the top of the barrier. • The temporary construction noise barriers shall have a weight of at least 2.5 pounds per square foot, which is equivalent to 3/a Inch thick plywood. • To avoid objectionable noise reflections, the source side of the temporary construction noise barrier shall be lined with an acoustic absorption material meeting a noise reduction coefficient rating of 0.70 or greater in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials Test Method C423. Transportation/Traffic TRAF-1 Prior to occupancy City of Rancho Compliance with project Haven Avenue at 4N Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street Cucamonga Public Works conditions of approval to north Haven Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this Services Department improvement. TRAF-2 Milliken Avenue at 4th Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street to north Milliken Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this improvement. Prior to occupancy City of Rancho Compliance with project Cucamonga Public Works conditions of approval Services Department 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Agency Responsible for Monitoring/ Reporting Mitigation Measures Implementation Timing Monitoring Method Tribal Cultural Resources TRI-1 Ongoing during City of Rancho Compliance with project Discovery of Human Remains: If human remains or funerary objects are construction. Cucamonga Planning conditions of approval. encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the Department immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the City of Rancho County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code Cucamonga Building and §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. Safety Services Department TRI-2 Ongoing during Project Applicant,/ Compliance with project Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources: In the event that Native American construction. Construction Contractor conditions of approval. cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the City of Rancho immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a Cucamonga Planning qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to Department assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the I buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, San Tcn Manuel Band of Mission Indians will be contacted if any such find occurs and -o be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the N archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Agency Responsible for Monitoring/ Reporting Mitigation Measures Implementation Timing Monitoring Method the commencement of ground disturbance activities to the procurement of certified building pads by the project's civil engineer and geotechnical engineer, as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If previously unidentified paleontological resources are uncovered during site preparation, grading, or excavation, the paleontological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt or divert grading in the immediate area of the discovery and to evaluate the resources. If the paleontologist determines that they are unique paleontological resources as defined by Section 21083.2 of CEQA, then the paleontologist shall conduct additional excavations to avoid impacts to these resources by the development. If they are not "unique" then no further mitigation would be required. Unique cultural resources shall be determined based on the criteria set forth in Section 21083.2 of CEQA. CUL-2 Priorto the issuance of any grading permits, orany permit authorizing ground -� disturbance, the project applicant shall, to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director, demonstrate that the following note Is included on any grading plans: T If human skeletal remains are uncovered during construction, the contractor (depending on the project component) shall immediately halt work within 50 tp feet of the find, contact the San Bernardino County coroner to evaluate the r� remains, and follow the procedures and protocols set forth in Section cn 15064.5(e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the County Coroner shall contact the NAHC, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the contractor shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the contractor has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Noise Incorporation of requirement into grading and building plans (plan notes); Ongoing during construction. City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department Compliance with project conditions of approval. NOI-1 Ongoing during City of Rancho Compliance with project Construction Noise Monitoring and Temporary Noise Barriers: Construction or construction. Cucamonga Planning conditions of approval. grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in City of Rancho Department Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050, as measured atthe adjacent City of Rancho property line. During construction, the applicant shall perform weekly noise level Cucamonga Building and d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is not located within a known or suspected cemetery and there are no known human remains within the project site. However, this does not preclude finding human remains during project -related ground disturbance. In compliance with State regulations, should any human remains be encountered during construction activities, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbances shall occur in the immediate area until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. In addition, in accordance with State and local guidelines, if the Coroner determines the remains to be of a Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours for identification of the most likely descendent of the deceased Native American. Additionally, if the remains are determined to be Native American, the City would work with local Native American representatives to ensurethatthe remains and any associated artifacts are treated in a respectful and dignified manner. Despite the applicable regulatory framework and the relatively low likelihood of discovery, it remains possible that the proposed project would discover human remains during subsurface activities, which could then result in the remains being inadvertently damaged. To reduce this potentially significant impact to a less than significant level, all construction related impacts of human remains shall be monitored in accordance with Mitigation Measure CUL-2 and to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director. Mitigation Measure CUL-2 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, or any permit authorizing ground disturbance, the project applicant shall, to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director, demonstrate that the following note is included on any grading plans: If human skeletal remains are uncovered during construction, the contractor (depending on the project component) shall immediately halt work within 50 feet of the find, contact the San Bernardino County coroner to evaluate the remains, and follow the procedures and protocols set forth in Section 15064.5(e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the County Coroner shall contact the NAHC, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the contractor shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the contractor has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Cumulative Impacts The proposed project would result in no impacts to historical, known archaeological or paleontological resources, or known human remains. The chances of cumulative impacts occurring as a result of project implementation plus implementation of other projects in the region is not likely since proposed projects would be subject to individual project -level environmental review. Since there would be no project -related impacts and due to existing laws and regulations in place to protect cultural resources and prevent significant impact to paleontological resources, the potential incremental effects of the proposed projectwouid not be cumulatively considerable. 4th Street and Utica Avenue Warehouse Project 130 F1—F6 Pg217 Aerial Photo for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT19823 & Design Review DRC2017-00402 F1—F6 Pg218 - City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration Is being circulated forpublic review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017- 00408, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. Public Review Period Closes: December 13, 2017 Project Name: The 4th Street and Utica Avenue Project Applicant: Warehouse Project CP Logistics Utica, LLC 20411 SW Birch Street #200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Project Location (also see attached map): The project site is located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue and is comprised of one (1) parcel with a combined area of 13.96 acres and is currently undeveloped — APN: 0210-081-43 (formerly APN: 0210-081-19 and a portion of APN: 0210-081-20). Project Description: A proposal to subdivide one (1) existing parcel into three (3) parcels in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings on a 13.96-acre site within the Industrial Park (IP) District located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue. The project includes a Subdivision Map SUBTPM19823, a Design Review DRC2017-00402 and a Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 to construct an industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres. Also included is Minor Exception DRC2017- 00406, to reduce the required setback for average depth of landscape and Minor Exception DRC2017-00408, to increase the height of the screen wall along Trademark North Parkway by a maximum of 2 feet and finally, a Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405 for the removal of 15 existing trees on -site. FINDING This Is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine If the project may have a significant effect on the environment and Is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. EXHIBIT V F1—F6Pg219 NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. December 13, 2017 Date of Determination Adopted By F1—F6 Pg220 RESOLUTION NO. 17-99 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19823, A PROPOSAL TO SUBDIVIDE ONE (1) EXISTING PARCEL INTO THREE (3) PARCELS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF THREE (3) INDUSTRIAL LOGISTICS BUILDINGS ON A 13.96-ACRE SITE WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DISTRICT LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THTH STREET AND UTICA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0210-081-43. A. Recitals. 1. CP Logistics Utica, LLC filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 19823, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of December 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on December 13, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) District and is comprised of one (1) parcel with a combined area of 13.96 acres and is currently undeveloped. The parcel is surrounded to the north, south and east by partial right-of-way improvements, including 4th Street, Utica Avenue, Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North, and is surrounded to the west by a vacant undeveloped vineyard; and b. To the east, across Utica Avenue, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently reviewing a Design Review (DRC2016-00670) and a Specific Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00931) for a proposed industrial building on that property. To the south, across 4th Street within the City of Ontario, is a residential apartment complex. To the west, at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently processing a Design Review (DRC2017-00205) and a Development Code Amendment (DRC2017-00204) for the proposed development of two hotels and a future restaurant pad on that property. The zoning of the subject property and the properties to the north is Industrial F1—F6 Pg221 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-99 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19823 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 2 Park (IP) District. The zoning of the properties to the west is Industrial Park (IP) District and Haven Avenue Overlay District (HAOD). The zoning of the properties to the east is Empire Lakes Specific Plan Area 5. The zoning of the property to the south is Urban Residential District (Ontario Center Specific Plan), which is within the jurisdiction of the City of Ontario; and C. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the subject property, which currently consists of one (1) parcel, into three (3) new parcels; and d. Parcel 1 is 6.02 acres in size and is located adjacent to Utica Avenue and 4th Street, Parcel 2 is 6.07 acres in size and is located adjacent to Utica Avenue and Bentley Street and Parcel 3 is 1.87 acres in size and is located at the site's northernmost point, adjacent to Trademark Parkway North; and e. Per Section 17.36.040 of the Development Code, the minimum lot areas for parcels within the Industrial Park (I) District is 0.50 acre; and f. The applicant proposes to develop the entire 13.96-acre site. This includes the construction of three (3) industrial logistics buildings, parking, landscaping and remaining street improvements along the southern, eastern and northern perimeter of the site. The related entitlements include Design Review DRC2017-00402, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404, Tree Removal Permit DPC2017-00405, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406 and Minor Exception DRC2017-00408; and g. As a condition of approval, the remaining street improvements along the project frontage will be installed, including parkway, street trees, sidewalk and street lighting. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed teritative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code Industrial Park (IP) land use and zoning designations for the project site; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed tentative parcel map is consistent with the Industrial Park (IP) General Plan land use designation. The related Design Review (DRC2017-00402) includes two Minor Exceptions, one (DRC2017-00406) for a reduction in the required average landscape setback and one (DRC2017-00408) for an increase in the maximum permitted wall height. With approval of these related exceptions, the project will be consistent with the Development Code; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project site abuts four public streets and will have access to the existing utilities that currently serve the adjacent industrial developments; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The Initial Study Part II outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less -than -significant; and F1—F6 Pg222 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-99 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19823 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 3 e. The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The subdivision is for industrial purposes and will likely be occupied by tenants conducting light industrial uses that will be within the building. Based on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas sections of the Initial Study Part II, the project is not likely to create significant health problems; and f. The design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The project site does not contain any existing easements. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. F146 Pg223 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-99 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19823 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 4 Environmental Mitioation Biological Resources 1) Burrowing Owl Pre -Construction Survey: A qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction presence/absence survey for burrowing owl(s) within 30 days of scheduled site disturbance. Project site disturbance may proceed once the qualified biologist confirms no burrowing owl(s) or sign (molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement) are present on site. If burrowing owl(s) or sign are observed during the pre -construction presence/absence survey, the qualified biologist will monitor the burrow(s) for up to two weeks to determine if the burrow(s) are occupied. If the burrow(s) are occupied, the qualified biologist will coordinate burrowing owl avoidance and/or passive relocation in conjunction with CDFW. If the qualified biologist confirms at the expiration of the two -week period that there is no burrowing owl onsite, construction/site disturbance activities may commence. 2) Nesting Bird Pre -Construction Survey: Vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities should be conducted outside of the nesting season (January 15 to August 31). If these activities occur during nesting season, then a qualified biologist will conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including tree and shrub removal, disking, demolition activities, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the nests depending on the level of activity within the buffer and species detected, and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. Raptor species will have an avoidance buffer of 500 feet and other bird species will have an avoidance buffer of 300 feet. These buffers may be reduced in consultation with the CDFW. If active nests are not identified, vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities may be commenced. Cultural Resources 1) Paleontological Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and/or action that would permit project site disturbance (whichever occurs first), the applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department that the applicant has retained a qualified paleontologist to address unanticipated discoveries. The paleontologist shall attend all pre- grading meetings and shall monitor daily grading/construction operations from the commencement of ground disturbance activities to the procurement of certified building pads by the project's civil engineer and geotechnical engineer, as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If previously unidentified paleontological resources are uncovered during site F1—F6 Pg224 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-99 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19823 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 5 preparation, grading, or excavation, the paleontological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt or divert grading in the immediate area of the discovery and to evaluate the resources. If the paleontologist determines that they are unique paleontological resources as defined by Section 21083.2 of CEQA, then the paleontologist shall conduct additional excavations to avoid impacts to these resources by the development. If they are not "unique" then no further mitigation would be required. Unique cultural resources shall be determined based on the criteria set forth in Section 21083.2 of CEQA. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, or any permit authorizing ground disturbance, the project applicant shall, to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director, demonstrate that the following note is included on any grading plans: If human skeletal remains are uncovered during construction, the contractor (depending on the project component) shall immediately halt work within 50 feet of the find, contact the San Bernardino County coroner to evaluate the remains, and follow the procedures and protocols set forth in Section 15064.5(e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the County Coroner shall contact the NAHC, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the contractor shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the contractor has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Noise 1) Construction Noise Monitoring and Temporary Noise Barriers: Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the adjacent property line. During construction, the applicant shall perform weekly noise level monitoring. The findings of the noise monitoring shall be reported to the Building Official and City Planning Department on a monthly basis; however, the Building Official and City Planning Department must be notified immediately if noise levels exceed 70 dBA per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050. If noise levels exceed 70 dBA at the adjacent property line, construction activities shall be halted, reduced in intensity to a level of compliance, or temporary construction noise barriers shall be used. If temporary construction noise barriers are used, they shall comply with the following criteria or F1—F6 Pg225 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-99 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19823 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 6 as otherwise approved by the Building Official and City Planning Department: Temporary construction noise barriers shall be installed and maintained by the construction contractor along the property line such that they block the line of sight between the construction equipment and the adjacent uses. The temporary construction noise barriers shall be a minimum height of 12 feet high. The temporary construction noise barriers shall be solid from the ground to the top of the barrier. The temporary construction noise barriers shall have a weight of at least 2.5 pounds per square foot, which is equivalent to % inch thick plywood. To avoid objectionable noise reflections, the source side of the temporary construction noise barrier shall be lined with an acoustic absorption material meeting a noise reduction coefficient rating of 0.70 or greater in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials TestMethod C423. Transportation/Traffic 1) Haven Avenue at 4th Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street to north Haven Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair - share basis to this improvement. 2) Milliken Avenue at 4th Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street to north Milliken Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this improvement. Tribal Cultural Resources 1) Discovery of Human Remains: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. 2) Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources: In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information F1—F6 Pg226 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-99 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19823 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 7 and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WA ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: F1—F6 Pg227 Project #: Conditions of Approval Community Development Department SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni //! 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for: 1) The subdivision of one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823) in conjunction with a related development located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 2) The construction of an industrial development (Design Review DRC2017-00402) consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 3) The formation of a Uniform Sign Program (Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404) related to a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 4) A Tree Removal Permit (Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405) request to remove eleven (11) heritage trees in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial buildings located at the northwest comer of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 5) A Minor Exception (Minor Exception DRC2017-00406) to reduce the required setback for average depth of landscape along Fourth Street and Utica Avenue by a maximum of ten (10%) percent in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 6) A Minor Exception (Minor Exception DRC2017-00408) to increase the height of the screen wall along Trademark North Parkway by a maximum of 2 feet in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest comer of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. Printed: 1 V2812017 www.CityofRC.us F1—F6 Pg228 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of -sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on -site to match the building. 3. All ground -mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back -flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on -center. All ground -mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 4. The employee break area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the building, and tables, chairs/benches, and waste receptacles shall be provided. 5. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. Where tubular steel wrought iron sliding gates are used, they shall be backed by solid or perforated metal sheeting painted to match the fence or gate. 6. All outdoor lighting shall be recessed and/or constructed with full downward shielding in order to reduce light and glare impacts on trespass to adjoining properties and public rights -of -way. Each fixture shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights -of -way, so that no light fixture directly illuminates an area outside of the project site intended to be illuminated. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the_ issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Approval of Tentative Parcel No. 19823 is granted subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 9. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval with Conditions all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and ar e Printed: 11/28/2017 mvw.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 18 F1—F6 Pg229 Project#: SUBTPM'l9823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC20'l7-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Desion Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 11. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 12. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 13. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 14. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 15. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 16. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 17. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 18. A detailed on -site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 19.Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 20. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. Printed:vrvw.CityofRC.usntetl: 11/28/2017 Page 3 of 18 F1—F6 Pg230 Project : SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 22. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 23. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 24. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 25. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 26. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 27. Perimeter and parking lot landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees within the public right-of-way. 28. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 29. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 30. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. Printed: 11/2812017 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 18 F1—F6 Pg231 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC20,17-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 32. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 33. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 34. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 35. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment and shall be architecturally compatible to the buildings onsite. The walls shall be comprised of the same material as the primary building material or shall be constructed of decorative masonry blocks with a decorative finish such as stucco textured to match a concrete tilt up wall. 36. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 37. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 38. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 39. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 40. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 41. All vehicle driveways shall be decorative in design consistent with the approved plans. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 'Printed: 1 V2812017 envw.CityofRC.us page 5 of 18 F146 Pg232 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Traffic Requirements: 1. 4th Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards as required and including: A. Protect or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, traffic signal equipment, and signing & striping as required. B. Provide a bus bay -right turn lane into the project site per City Standard Plan 119. C. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including minimum driveway approach widths, distance from intersections, and spacing from other driveways. D. Modify curb ramps to the latest ADA standards. 2. Utica Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Industrial Collector' standards as required and including: A. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. B. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including stacking distance, approach widths, and driveway distance from an intersection. 3. Bentley Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Collector with Median" standards as required and including: A. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. B. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including driveway approach width. 4. Trademark Parkway North frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Collector with Median" standards as required and including: D. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. E. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including driveway approach width. F. Show sight lines for the driveway along Trademark Parkway. A no -build easement may be required to provide adequate line of sight. Tree removals may be required along Trademark median 2. Provide a bus bay -right turn lane into the project site on 4th Street per City Standard Plan 119. 3. Reciprocal access easements from the lots to the west for the benefit of parcel 1 and parcel 3 shall be recorded prior to approval of the final map. 4. The City of Ontario will need to approve all direct connections to the 4th Street storm drain. All drainage studies that impact their downstream facilities will be routed to the City of Ontario for review. Coordinate with the City of Ontario to get a better understanding of their requirements. 5. The pavement on 4th Street is scheduled to be rehabilitated due to it's condition. Coordinate with the capital improvements department for timing of the improvements. 6. Development impact fees will be collected upon issuance of the building permit per the engineering fee schedule. Note that fees are subject to change annually. Printed: 11/28/2017 vmvw.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 18 F1—F6 Pg233 Project4: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: Project Type: -021008120-0000 Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 7. The existing ramps located at the southwest corner of Bentley and Utica and the northwest corner of Utica and Fourth shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If any ramp does not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramp for compliance. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit or approval of final subdivision map whichever occurs first. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 8. Update plan 1365 for the work on Utica, Bentley, and Trademark Parkway. Provide new plans for the work on Fourth Street 9. Per Resolution No. 87-96: All developments, except those contained in section 7 and others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development. The 66kV lines do not need to be undergrounded. The poles supporting the 66kV lines shall be moved to accommodate the location of proposed curbs, driveways, bus bays, etc. 10. The street lights shall be LS-2 type and owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. Street light design shall be supplemental to the public improvement plans. 11. Vacate a portion of Trademark Parkway south of Bentley. The existing public improvements shall be removed from that area. Coordinate with SCE for the removal of the existing street light. Provide evidence that all public utilities are removed or relocated prior to the vacation. No public access to the vacated area of Trademark Parkway shall be allowed. Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 13. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 14. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 41 total feet on Trademark Parkway North 41 total feet on Bentley Street 33 total feet on Utica Avenue 60 total feet on Fourth Street 15. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 16. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. Printed: ll/2812017. vnvw.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 18 F1—F6 Pg234 Project #: SUBTPibl19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 18. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 19. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 20. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 21. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first, for: Parcel 1 and the lot to the west Parcel 3 and the lot to the west 22. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 23. Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development on Fourth, Utica, Bentley, and Trademark Parkway. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, - along with three 1 114" innerducts in one of the 4" conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber -to -the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to final map approval. Printed; 1112812017 bm.CltyofRC.us Page 8 of 18 F1—F6 Pg235 Project#: SUB i Pibl'19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC20-17-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 ` Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 25. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. Printed. 11I282017 vnvw.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 18 F1—F6 Pg236 Project#: SUBTPlM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC20-17-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 26.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be , per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 27.Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 28. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 29. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 30. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Printed: 1128/2017 vnvw.CilyofRC.us Page 10 of 18 F1—F6 Pg237 Project;;: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical development. for electric service and shall construct agreement and shall construct electrical and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho service provider for all project related 32. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 33. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 34. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 35. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as proposed. Additional FD Access doors are required on all the proposed buildings; FD Access doors spacing shall not exceed 100'. If the buildings are divided into suites, riser access to the building must be provided to all tenants served by the system from the exterior of the building without entering another suite; Maximum Travel distance is limited to 250' without smoke hatches. The Fire Standards and Guidance Documents are available on the City's web site www.cityofrc.us follow the path from the home page to city hall/fire district/prevention/fire code standards. Printed: 11/28/2017 mvw.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 18 F1—F6 Pg238 Project#: SUBTPlbl19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni l/l 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. Printed: 11128t2017 WWW.CilyofRC.us Page 12 of 18 F1—F6 Pg239 Project#: SUBTPiV119823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17, Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: 1) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; ill) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Printed: 11l28/2017 wvrov.CilyofRC.us Page 13 of F1—F6 Pg240 Project#: SUBTPM'19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, D RC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Utica Avenue and Fourth Street) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. i 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 21. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 22. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 23. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 24. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. Printed: 11/28/2017 mm.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 18 F146 Pg241 Project;:: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC20-17-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 27. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable", Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 28. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 29. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 30. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 31. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 32. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 33. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 34. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 35. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. Printed: 1112812017 %"m.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 18 F1—F6 Pg242 Project#: SUBTPM'19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2o17-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 39. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 11/28/2017 vnvw.CityofRC,us - Page 16 of 18 F1—F6 Pg243 Project;:: SUBTRM19823 DRC20i7-00402, DR02017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. GROUND WATER. PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity(77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular(78) repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. 1. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific water quality management plan shall specifically addressed items: a., b., c., d., and I., above. Printed: 11/26/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 17 or18. F1—F6 Pg244 Project:: SUBTPM,19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC20-17-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 43. The permitted grading plan and the final project -specific water quality management plan are proposing stormwater detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. Printed: 11/28l2017 vAm.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 16 F1—F6 Pg245 RESOLUTION NO. 17-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2017-00402, A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF THREE (3) INDUSTRIAL LOGISTICS BUILDINGS WITH A COMBINED FLOOR AREA OF 293,283 SQUARE FEET ON A PARCEL OF ABOUT 13.96 ACRES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF UTICA AVENUE AND 4TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0210-081-43. A. Recitals. 1. CP Logistics Utica, LLC filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2017-00402, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of December 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on December 13, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue and is comprised of one (1) parcel with a combined area of 13.96 acres and is currently undeveloped. The parcel is surrounded to the north, south and east by partial right-of-way improvements, including 4th Street, Utica Avenue, Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North, and is surrounded to the west by a vacant undeveloped vineyard; and b. To the east, across Utica Avenue, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently reviewing a Design Review (DRC2016-00670) and a Specific Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00931) for an industrial building on that property. To the south, across 4th Street within the City of Ontario, is a residential apartment complex. To the west, at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently processing a Design Review (DRC2017-00205) and a Development Code Amendment (DRC2017-00204) for the proposed development of two hotels and a future restaurant pad on that property. The zoning of the subject property and the properties to the north is Industrial Park (IP) District. The zoning of the properties to the west is Industrial Park (IP) District and Haven Avenue F1—F6 Pg246 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-100 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00402 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 2 Overlay District (HAOD). The zoning of the properties to the east is Empire Lakes Specific Plan Area 5. The zoning of the property to the south is Urban Residential District (Ontario Center Specific Plan), which is within the jurisdiction of the City of Ontario; and C. The site has a General Plan land use designation of Industrial Park; and d. The application is for a proposal to develop the entire 13.96-acre site with three (3) industrial logistics buildings, parking, landscaping and remaining street improvements along the southern, eastern and northern perimeter of the site; and e. Building one contains 11,000 square feet of office area and 106,500 square feet of warehouse area for a total of 117,500 square feet of building area. Building two contains 7,000 square feet of office area and 137,395 square feet of warehouse area for a total of 144,395 square feet of building area. Building three contains 4,000 square feet of office area and 27,388 square feet of warehouse area for a total of 31,388 square feet of building area. The overall building square footage for the project is 293,283; and f. Each building will be made up of concrete tilt up panel walls that incorporate decorative reveal lines as the primary building material, with a combination, of glass, metal awnings, columns and decorative texturing as the secondary building materials. The maximum building height for the project is 36 feet; and g. The proposed floor area ratio (FAR) is 48.2 percent. The maximum allowable FAR for the Industrial Park (IP) District is 60 percent; and h. The overall average landscape coverage for the project is 15.04 percent. The minimum required landscape coverage for developments within the Industrial Park (IP) District is 15 percent; and i. The Applicant also proposes the subdivision of the entire 13.96-acre site from one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels. One of three (3) industrial logistics buildings will be constructed on each of the proposed parcels. The related entitlements include Uniform Sign Program DRC2017- 00404, Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406 and Minor Exception DRC2017-00408. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Industrial Park. The General Plan states that Industrial Park land use designation accommodates master planned concentrations of light industrial, research and development, green technology and general or medical uses. The project is for the development of a 3-building industrial complex, is consistentwith the intent of the General Plan's Industrial Park land use designation; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The Development Code states that the Industrial Park (IP) District is for the development of industrial uses with a maximum FloorArea Ratio (FAR) of F146 Pg247 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-100 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00402 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 3 60 percent. The project is for the development of 3-building industrial warehouse project on a 13.96- acre site with a proposed FAR of 48.2, in accord with intent of the Industrial Park (IP) District; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposal includes two Minor Exceptions, one (DRC2017-00406) for a reduction in the required average landscape setback and one (DRC2017-00408) for an increase in the maximum permitted wall height. With approval of these related exceptions, the project will be consistent with the Development Code; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Initial Study Part II outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less - than -significant. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the F1—F6 Pg248 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-100 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00402 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Environmental Mitigation Biological Resources 1) Burrowing Owl Pre -Construction Survey: A qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction presence/absence survey for burrowing owl(s) within 30 days of scheduled site disturbance. Project site disturbance may proceed once the qualified biologist confirms no burrowing owl(s) or sign (molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement) are present on site. If burrowing owl(s) or sign are observed during the pre -construction presence/absence survey, the qualified biologist will monitor the burrow(s) for up to two weeks to determine if the burrow(s) are occupied. If the burrow(s) are occupied, the qualified biologist will coordinate burrowing owl avoidance and/or passive relocation in conjunction with CDFW. If the qualified biologist confirms at the expiration of the two -week period that there is no burrowing owl onsite, construction/site disturbance activities may commence. 2) Nesting Bird Pre -Construction Survey: Vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities should be conducted outside of the nesting season (January 15 to August 31). If these activities occur during nesting season, then a qualified biologist will conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including tree and shrub removal, disking, demolition activities, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the nests depending on the level of activity within the buffer and species detected, and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. Raptor species will have an avoidance buffer of 500 feet and other bird species will have an avoidance buffer of 300 feet. These buffers may be reduced in consultation with the CDFW. If active nests are not identified, vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities may be commenced. Cultural Resources 1) Paleontological Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and/or action that would permit project site disturbance (whichever occurs first), the applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department that the applicant has retained a qualified paleontologist to address unanticipated F1—F6 Pg249 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-100 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00402 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 5 discoveries. The paleontologist shall attend all pre- grading meetings and shall monitor daily grading/construction operations from the commencement of ground disturbance activities to the procurement of certified building pads by the project's civil engineer and geotechnical engineer, as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If previously unidentified paleontological resources are uncovered during site preparation, grading, or excavation, the paleontological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt or divert grading in the immediate area of the discovery and to evaluate the resources. If the paleontologist determines that they are unique paleontological resources as defined by Section 21083.2 of CEQA, then the paleontologist shall conduct additional excavations to avoid impacts to these resources by the development. If they are not "unique" then no further mitigation would be required. Unique cultural resources shall be determined based on the criteria set forth in Section 21083.2 of CEQA. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, or any permit authorizing ground disturbance, the project applicant shall, to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director, demonstrate that the following note is included on any grading plans: If human skeletal remains are uncovered during construction, the contractor (depending on the project component) shall immediately halt work within 50 feet of the find, contact the San Bernardino County coroner to evaluate the remains, and follow the procedures and protocols set forth in Section 15064.5(e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the County Coroner shall contact the NAHC, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the contractor shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the contractor has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Noise 1) Construction Noise Monitoring and Temporary Noise Barriers: Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the adjacent property line. During construction, the applicant shall perform weekly noise level monitoring. The findings of the noise monitoring shall be reported to the Building Official and City Planning Department on a monthly basis; however, the Building Official and City Planning Department must be notified immediately if noise levels exceed 70 dBA per the City of Rancho F1—F6 Pg250 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-100 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00402 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 6 Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050. If noise levels exceed 70 dBA at the adjacent property line, construction activities shall be halted, reduced in intensity to a level of compliance, or temporary construction noise barriers shall be used. If temporary construction noise barriers are used, they shall comply with the following criteria or as otherwise approved by the Building Official and 'City Planning Department: Temporary construction noise barriers shall be installed and maintained'.by the construction contractor along the property line such that .they block the line of sight between the construction equipment and the adjacent uses. • The temporary construction noise barriers shall be a minimum height of 12 feet high. • The temporary construction noise barriers shall be solid .from the ground to the top of the barrier. • The temporary construction noise barriers shall have a weight of at least 2.5 pounds per square foot, which is equivalent to'/a inch thick plywood. • To avoid objectionable noise reflections, the source side of the temporary construction noise barrier shall be lined with an acoustic absorption material meeting a noise reduction coefficient rating of 0.70 or greater in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials Test Method C423. Transportation/Traffic 1) Haven Avenue at 4th Street: Add,a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street to north Haven Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this improvement. 2) Milliken Avenue at 4th Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street to north Milliken Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this improvement. Tribal Cultural Resources 1) Discovery of Human Remains: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associatedwith the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. 2) Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources: In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shalt cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior F1-F6 Pg251 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-100 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00402 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 7 standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: F1—F6 Pg252 Conditions of Approval (;tT�tntonca Community Development Department Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for: 1) The subdivision of one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823) in conjunction with a related development located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 2) The construction of an industrial development (Design Review DRC2017-00402) consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 3) The formation of a Uniform Sign Program (Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404) related to a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 4) A Tree Removal Permit (Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405) request to remove eleven (11) heritage trees in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 5) A Minor Exception (Minor Exception DRC2017-00406) to reduce the required setback for average depth of landscape along Fourth Street and Utica Avenue by a maximum of ten (10%) percent in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 6) A Minor Exception (Minor Exception DRC2017-00408) to increase the height of the screen wall along Trademark North Parkway by a maximum of 2 feet in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest comer of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. Printed, 11282017 w .CltyofRc.us F1-F6 Pg253 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406 DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of -sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on -site to match the building. 3. All ground -mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back -flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on -center. All ground -mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 4. The employee break area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the building, and tables, chairs/benches, and waste receptacles shall be provided. 5. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. Where tubular steel wrought iron sliding gates are used, they shall be backed by solid or perforated metal sheeting painted to match the fence or gate. 6. All outdoor lighting shall be recessed and/or constructed with full downward shielding in order to reduce light and glare impacts on trespass to adjoining properties and public rights -of -way. Each fixture shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights -of -way, so that no light fixture directly illuminates an area outside of the project site intended to be illuminated. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Approval of Tentative Parcel No. 19823 is granted subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 9. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval with Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. Printed: 112www.CityofRC.us8/2017 Page Z of 18 F1—F6 Pg254 Project #: Project Name SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Panattoni H/ 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 11. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 6 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 12. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 13. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 14. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 15. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 16. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 17. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 18. A detailed on -site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 19.Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 20. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. Printed: 1112812017 wwv.CityofRC.us F1—F6 Pg255 Page 3 of 18 Project : SUBTPIUI19823 DRC2017-00402. DRC2017-00404, DRC20-17-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 22. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 23. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 24. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 25. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 26. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures, Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 27. Perimeter and parking lot 'landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees within the public right-of-way. 28. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 29. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 30. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. Printed: 11128/2017 . www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of.18 F1—F6 Pg256 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DP.C2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 32. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 33. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 34. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 35. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment and shall be architecturally compatible to the buildings onsite. The walls shall be comprised of the same material as the primary building material or shall be constructed of decorative masonry blocks with a decorative finish such as stucco textured to match a concrete tilt up wall. 36. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 37. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 38. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 39. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 40. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 41. All vehicle driveways shall be decorative in design consistent with the approved plans. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed: 11/28/2017 mvw.CilyofRC.us Page 5 of iB F1—F6 Pg257 Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Traffic Requirements: 1. 4th Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards as required and including: A. Protect or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, traffic signal equipment, and signing & striping as required. B. Provide a bus bay -right turn lane into the project site per City Standard Plan 119. C. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including minimum driveway approach widths, distance from intersections, and spacing from other driveways. D. Modify curb ramps to the latest ADA standards. 2. Utica Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Industrial Collector" standards as required and including: A. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. B. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including stacking distance, approach widths, and driveway distance from an intersection. 3. Bentley Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Collector with Median" standards as required and including: A. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. B. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including driveway approach width. 4. Trademark Parkway North frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Collector with Median" standards as required and including: D. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. E. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including driveway approach width. F. Show sight lines for the driveway along Trademark Parkway. A no -build easement may be required to provide adequate line of sight. Tree removals may be required along Trademark median 2. Provide a bus bay -right turn lane into the project site on 4th Street per City Standard Plan 119. 3. Reciprocal access easements from the lots to the west for the benefit of parcel 1 and parcel 3 shall be recorded prior to approval of the final map. 4. The City of Ontario will need to approve all direct connections to the 4th Street storm drain. All drainage studies that impact their downstream facilities will be routed to the City of Ontario for review. Coordinate with the City of Ontario to get a better understanding of their requirements. 5. The pavement on 4th Street is scheduled to be rehabilitated due to it's condition. Coordinate with the capital improvements department for timing of the improvements. 6. Development impact fees will be collected upon issuance of the building permit per the engineering fee schedule. Note that fees are subject to change annually. , Printed: 11I2812017 w^vw.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 16 F1—F6 Pg258 Project : SUB T PM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 7. The existing ramps located at the southwest corner of Bentley and Utica and the northwest corner of Utica and Fourth shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If any ramp does not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramp for compliance. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit or approval of final subdivision map whichever occurs first. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 8. Update plan 1365 for the work on Utica, Bentley, and Trademark Parkway. Provide new plans for the work on Fourth Street 9. Per Resolution No. 87-96: All developments, except those contained in section 7 and others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development. The 66kV lines do not need to be undergrounded. The poles supporting the 66kV lines shall be moved to accommodate the location of proposed curbs, driveways, bus bays, etc. 10. The street lights shall be LS-2 type and owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. Street light design shall be supplemental to the public improvement plans. 11. Vacate a portion of Trademark Parkway south of Bentley. The existing public improvements shall be removed from that area. Coordinate with SCE for the removal of the existing street light. Provide evidence that all public utilities are removed or relocated prior to the vacation. No public access to the vacated area of Trademark Parkway shall be allowed. Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 13. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 14. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 41 total feet on Trademark Parkway North 41 total feet on Bentley Street 33 total feet on Utica Avenue 60 total feet on Fourth Street 15. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 16. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. Printed: 11/2612017 vnvw.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 78 F1-176 Pg259 Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC20'17-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 18. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 19. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 20. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 21. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first, for: Parcel 1 and the lot to the west Parcel 3 and the lot to the west 22. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 23. Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development on Fourth, Utica, Bentley, and Trademark Parkway. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, along with three 1 114" innerducts in one of the 4" conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber -to -the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to final map approval. Printed: 11/2812017 www.CltyofRC.us Page 8 of 18 F1—F6 Pg260 Project #: SUBTPM19823 DP.C2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 25. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. Printed: 11/2812017 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 18 F146 Pg261 Project#: SUBTPNI19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 26.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shalt include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 27.Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 28. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 29. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 30. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Printed: 11/28/2017 `N .CityofRC.us Page 10 of 18 F1—F6 Pg262 Project#: SUSTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. 32. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 33. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 34. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 35. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as proposed. Additional FD Access doors are required on all the proposed buildings; FD Access doors spacing shall not exceed 100'. If the buildings are divided into suites, riser access to the building must be provided to all tenants served by the system from the exterior of the building without entering another suite; Maximum Travel distance is limited to 250' without smoke hatches. The Fire Standards and Guidance Documents are available on the City's web site mAv.cityofrc.us follow the path from the home page to city hall/fire district/prevention/fire code standards. Printed: i112812017 vnvw.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 18 F1—F6 Pg263 Project #: SUBTPfvl19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. Printed: 1112812017 w W.CilyofRC.us Page 12 of 18 F146 Pg264 Project: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code, 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Printed: 11128t2017 vn'mCityofRC.us Page 13 of 16 F1—F6 Pg265 Project #: SUB T PNI19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Utica Avenue and Fourth Street) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 21. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 22. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. in addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 23. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 24. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. Printed: 1112812017 www.CityofRC.us Page 1: of 18 F1—F6 Pg266 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC20,17-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 27. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 28. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 29. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 30. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 31. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified persontcompany on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 32. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 33. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental. Program Manager. 34. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 35. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. wnvw.CityofRC.us Printed: 11/282017 page 15 of 18 F1-176 Pg267 Project #: SUB i PM'19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "'Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D °Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 39. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. vrvw.CityofRC.0 Printed: 1112812017 Page 16 of 18 F1—F6 Pg268 Project n: Project Name: Location: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC20'17-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or fight industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78) repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific water quality management plan shall specifically addressed items: a., b., c., d., and I., above. Printed: 11/28/2017 vANw.CityofRC.us Page V of 18 1`1—F6 Pg269 Project#: SUB- PM'19823 DRC20'i7-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC20'17-00400, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 43. The permitted grading plan and the final project -specific water quality management plan are proposing stormwater detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. Printed: 11/2a12017 www.CityofRC.us F146 Pg270 Page 18 of 18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2017-00404, A PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH A UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM RELATED TO A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF THREE (3) INDUSTRIAL LOGISTICS BUILDINGS WITH A COMBINED FLOOR AREA OF 293,283 SQUARE FEET ON A PARCEL OF ABOUT 13.96 ACRES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF UTICA AVENUE AND 4TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0210-081-43. A. Recitals. 1. CP Logistics Utica, LLC filed an application for the approval of Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Uniform Sign Program request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of December 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on December 13, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue and is comprised of one (1) parcel with a combined area of 13.96 acres and is currently undeveloped. The parcel is surrounded to the north, south and east by partial right-of-way improvements, including 4th Street, Utica Avenue, Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North, and is surrounded to the west by a vacant undeveloped vineyard; and b. To the east, across Utica Avenue, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently reviewing a Design Review (DRC2016-00670) and a Specific Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00931) for a proposed industrial building on that property. To the south, across 4th Street within the City of Ontario, is a residential apartment complex. To the west, at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently processing a Design Review (DRC2017-00205) and a Development Code Amendment (DRC2017-00204) for the proposed development of two hotels and a future restaurant F1-1`6 Pg271 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-101 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2017-00404 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 2 pad on that property. The zoning of the subject property and the properties to the north is Industrial Park (IP) District. The zoning of the properties to the west is Industrial Park (IP) District and Haven Avenue Overlay District (HAOD). The zoning of the properties to the east is Empire Lakes Specific Plan Area 5. The zoning of the property to the south is Urban Residential District (Ontario Center Specific Plan), which is within the jurisdiction of the City of Ontario; and C. The site has a General Plan land use designation of Industrial Park; and d. The application is for a proposal to establish a Uniform Sign Program for a 3- building industrial complex; and e. The Uniform Sign Program includes specifications for construction requirements, prohibited signage, wall mounted signs and monument signs. The Program indicates the maximum tenant building sign area is 150 square feet and the maximum sign area for each monument is 24 square feet. These requirements are consistent with the maximum wall sign and monument sign areas listed in the Development Code; and f. The potential size, location, and placement of the signs will be integrated and compatible with the architecture of the buildings and the site; and g. This application is being proposed in conjunction with a proposal to subdivide the subject property into three (3) new parcels and construct three (3) industrial buildings totaling 235,325 square feet; and h. The project also involves applications for a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2017- 00405) to remove existing heritage trees from the project site, a Minor Exception (DRC2017-00406) to reduce the required average landscape depth along 4th Street by 10 percent and Minor Exception (DRC2017-00408) to increase the maximum wall height by 2 feet for a screen wall along Trademark Parkway North. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Uniform Sign Program is consistentwith the development standards for signs as provided in Chapter 17.74 (Sign Regulations for Private Property). The Uniform Sign Program indicates the maximum tenant building sign area is 150 square feet and the maximum sign area for each monument is 24 square feet. These requirements are consistent with the maximum wall sign and monument sign areas listed in the Development Code; and b. The design, location, and scale of proposed signs for the integrated development are in keeping with the architectural character of the development. The potential size, location, materials and placement of the signs will be integrated and compatible with the architecture of the industrial buildings and the site. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project F1—F6 Pg272 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-101 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2017-00404 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 3 will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Environmental Mitigation Biological Resources 1) Burrowing Owl Pre -Construction Survey: A qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction presence/absence survey for burrowing owl(s) within 30 days of scheduled site disturbance. Project site disturbance may proceed once the qualified biologist confirms no burrowing owl(s) or sign (molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement) are present on site. If burrowing F1—F6 Pg273 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-101 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2017-00404 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 4 owl(s) or sign are observed during the pre -construction presence/absence surrey, the qualified biologist will monitor the burrow(s) for up to two weeks to determine if the burrow(s) are occupied. If the burrow(s) are occupied, the qualified biologist will coordinate burrowing owl avoidance and/or passive relocation in conjunction with CDFW. If the qualified biologist confirms at the expiration of the two -week period that there is no burrowing owl onsite, construction/site disturbance activities may commence. 2) Nesting Bird Pre -Construction Survey: Vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities should be conducted outside of the nesting season (January 15 to August 31). If these activities occur during nesting season, then a qualified biologist will conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including tree and shrub removal, disking, demolition activities, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the nests depending on the level of activity within the buffer and species detected, and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. Raptor species will have an avoidance buffer of 500 feet and other bird species will have an avoidance buffer of 300 feet. These buffers may be reduced in consultation with the CDFW. If active nests are not identified, vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities may be commenced. Cultural Resources 1) Paleontological Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and/or action that would permit project site disturbance (whichever occurs first), the applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department that the applicant has retained a qualified paleontologist to address unanticipated discoveries. The paleontologist shall attend all pre- grading meetings and shall monitor daily grading/construction operations from the commencement of ground disturbance activities to the procurement of certified building pads by the project's civil engineer and geotechnical engineer, as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If previously unidentified paleontological resources are uncovered during site preparation, grading, or excavation, the paleontological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt or divert grading in the immediate area of the discovery and to evaluate the resources. If the paleontologist determines that they are unique paleontological resources as defined by Section 21083.2 of CEQA, then the paleontologist shall conduct additional excavations to avoid impacts to these resources by the development. If they are not "unique" then no further mitigation would be required. Unique cultural resources shall be determined based on the criteria set forth in Section 21083.2 of CEQA. F1—F6 Pg274 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-101 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2017-00404 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 5 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, or any permit authorizing ground disturbance, the project applicant shall, to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director, demonstrate that the following note is included on any grading plans: If human skeletal remains are uncovered during construction, the contractor (depending on the project component) shall immediately halt work within 50 feet of the find, contact the San Bernardino County coroner to evaluate the remains, and follow the procedures and protocols set forth in Section 15064.5(e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the County Coroner shall contact the NAHC, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the contractor shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the contractor has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Noise 1) Construction Noise Monitoring and Temporary Noise Barriers: Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the adjacent property line. During construction, the applicant shall perform weekly noise level monitoring. The findings of the noise monitoring shall be reported to the Building Official and City Planning Department on a monthly basis; however, the Building Official and City Planning Department must be notified immediately if noise levels exceed 70 dBA per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050. If noise levels exceed 70 dBA at the adjacent property line, construction activities shall be halted, reduced in intensity to a level of compliance, or temporary construction noise barriers shall be used. If temporary construction noise barriers are used, they shall comply with the following criteria or as otherwise approved by the Building Official and City Planning Department: Temporary construction noise barriers shall be installed and maintained by the construction contractor along the property line such that they block the line of sight between the construction equipment and the adjacent uses. • The temporary construction noise barriers shall be a minimum height of 12 feet high. F1—F6 Pg275 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-101 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2017-00404 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 6 The temporary construction noise barriers shall be solid from the ground to the top of the barrier. The temporary construction noise barriers shall have a weight of at least 2.5 pounds per square foot, which is equivalent to % inch thick plywood. To avoid objectionable noise reflections, the source side of the temporary construction noise barrier shall be lined with an acoustic absorption material meeting a noise reduction coefficient rating of 0.70 or greater in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials Test Method C423. Transportation/Traffic 1) Haven Avenue at 4th Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street to north Haven Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this improvement. 2) Milliken Avenue at 4th Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street to north Milliken Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this improvement. Tribal Cultural Resources 1) Discovery of Human Remains: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. 2) Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources: In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA F1—F6 Pg276 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-101 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2017-00404 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 7 BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: F1—F6 Pg277 Conditions of Approval jtwce° Community Development Department Cut:naroHc� Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni H/ 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for: 1) The subdivision of one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823) in conjunction with a related development located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43, 2) The construction of an industrial development (Design Review DRC2017-00402) consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 3) The formation of a Uniform Sign Program (Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404) related to a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land: APN: 0210-081-43. 4) A Tree Removal Permit (Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405) request to remove eleven (11) heritage trees in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial buildings located at the northwest comer of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 5) A Minor Exception (Minor Exception DRC2017-00406) to reduce the required setback for average depth of landscape along Fourth Street and Utica Avenue by a maximum of ten (10%) percent in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 6) A Minor Exception (Minor Exception DRC2017-00408) to increase the height of the screen wall along Trademark North Parkway by a maximum of 2 feet in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest comer of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. Frin:a7112812017 www.CityofRC.us F146 Pg278 Project#: SUBTPM19823 bRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DR62017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of -sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on -site to match the building. 3. All ground -mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back -flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on -center. All ground -mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 4. The employee break area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the building, and tables, chairs/benches, and waste receptacles shall be provided. 5. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. Where tubular steel wrought iron sliding gates are used, they shall be backed by solid or perforated metal sheeting painted to match the fence or gate. 6. All outdoor lighting shall be recessed and/or constructed with full downward shielding in order to reduce light and glare impacts on trespass to adjoining properties and public rights -of -way. Each fixture shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights -of -way, so that no light fixture directly illuminates an area outside of the project site intended to be illuminated. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Approval of Tentative Parcel No. 19823 is granted subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 9. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval with Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. Printed: 11/28/2017 www.CityofRC.us page 2 of 78 F1—F6 Pg279 Project#: SUBTPIV119823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 11. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 12. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 13. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 14. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 15. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 16. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 17. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 18. A detailed on -site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 19.Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 20. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. Printed: 11/28/2017 www.CityofRC,uS Page 3 of 16 F1—F6 Pg280 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-004:04, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 22. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 23. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 24. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 25. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 26. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 27. Perimeter and parking lot landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees within the public right-of-way. 28. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 29. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 30. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. Printed: 11128/2017 w^•vw.CityofRC.us Page 4 of IS F1—F6 Pg281 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 32. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 33. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 34. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 35. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment and shall be architecturally compatible to the buildings onsite. The walls shall be comprised of the same material as the primary building material or shall be constructed of decorative masonry blocks with a decorative finish such as stucco textured to match a concrete tilt up wall. 36. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 37. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 38. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 39. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 40. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 41. All vehicle driveways shall be decorative in design consistent with the approved plans. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed:11128/2017 vnvw.CityofRC,us Page 5 of 18 F1—F6 Pg282 Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Traffic Requirements: 1. 4th Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards as required and including: A. Protect or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, traffic signal equipment, and signing & striping as required. B. Provide a bus bay -right turn lane into the project site per City Standard Plan 119. C. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including minimum driveway approach widths, distance from intersections, and spacing from other driveways. D. Modify curb ramps to the latest ADA standards. 2. Utica Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Industrial Collector' standards as required and including: A. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. B. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including stacking distance, approach widths, and driveway distance from an intersection. 3. Bentley Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Collector with Median" standards as required and including: A. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. B. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including driveway approach width. 4. Trademark Parkway North frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Collector with Median" standards as required and including: D. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. E. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including driveway approach width. F. Show sight lines for the driveway along Trademark Parkway. A no -build easement may be required to provide adequate line of sight. Tree removals may be required along Trademark median 2. Provide a bus bay -right turn lane into the project site on 4th Street per City Standard Plan 119. 3. Reciprocal access easements from the lots to the west for the benefit of parcel 1 and parcel 3 shall be recorded prior to approval of the final map. 4. The City of Ontario will need to approve all direct connections to the 4th Street storm drain. All drainage studies that impact their downstream facilities will be routed to the City of Ontario for review. Coordinate with the City of Ontario to get a better understanding of their requirements. 5. The pavement on 4th Street is scheduled to be rehabilitated due to it's condition. Coordinate with the capital improvements department for timing of the improvements. 6. Development impact fees will be collected upon issuance of the building permit per the engineering fee schedule. Note that fees are subject to change annually. Printed: 11/2812017 vmw.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 18 F1—F6 Pg283 Project;?: SUSTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 7. The existing ramps located at the southwest corner of Bentley and Utica and the northwest corner of Utica and Fourth shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If any ramp does not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramp for compliance. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit or approval of final subdivision map whichever occurs first. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 8. Update plan 1365 for the work on Utica, Bentley, and Trademark Parkway. Provide new plans for the work on Fourth Street 9. Per Resolution No. 87-96: All developments, except those contained in section 7 and others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development. The 66kV lines do not need to be undergrounded. The poles supporting the 66kV lines shall be moved to accommodate the location of proposed curbs, driveways, bus bays, etc. 10. The street lights shall be LS-2 type and owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. Street light design shall be supplemental to the public improvement plans. 11. Vacate a portion of Trademark Parkway south of Bentley. The existing public improvements shall be removed from that area. Coordinate with SCE for the removal of the existing street light. Provide evidence that all public utilities are removed or relocated prior to the vacation. No public access to the vacated area of Trademark Parkway shall be allowed. Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 13. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 14. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 41 total feet on Trademark Parkway North 41 total feet on Bentley Street 33 total feet on Utica Avenue 60 total feet on Fourth Street 15. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 16. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. vAm.CityofRC.us Prinled:ll(28Y2017 Page 7 of 18 F1—F6 Pg284 Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 18. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 19. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 20. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 21. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first, for: Parcel 1 and the lot to the west Parcel 3 and the lot to the west 22. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 23. Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development on Fourth, Utica, Bentley, and Trademark Parkway. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, • along with three 1 1/4" innerducts in one of the 4" conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber -to -the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to final map approval. Printed: 1112812017 www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 18 F1-176 Pg285 Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 25. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. Printed: 1 U2a12017 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 18 F1—F6 Pg286 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 26.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those _ areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 27.Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 28. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 29. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 30. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Printed: 11/28/2017 vrvw.CityofRC.us Page 10 or 18 F1—F6 Pg287 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DP.C2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical development. for electric service and shall construct agreement and shall construct electrical and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho service provider for all project related 32. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 33. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 34. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 35. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as proposed. Additional FD Access doors are required on all the proposed buildings; FD Access doors spacing shall not exceed 100'. If the buildings are divided into suites, riser access to the building must be provided to all tenants served by the system from the exterior of the building without entering another suite; Maximum Travel distance is limited to 250' without smoke hatches. The Fire Standards and Guidance Documents are available on the City's web site www.cityofrc.us follow the path from the home page to city hall/fire district/prevention/fire code standards. Printed: 111282www. 017 CilyofRC.us page 11 of 18 F1—F6 Pg288 Project;:: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. Printed: 11(28120A WW,,v.CilyofRC.us Page 12 of 18 F1—F6 Pg289 Project;+: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location:-021DO8120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Printed: 11128/2017 www.Cityo(RC.us Page 13 of 18 F1—F6 Pg290 Project 4: SUBTPiN19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Utica Avenue and Fourth Street) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 21. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 22. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 23. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 24. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 11@8@017 Page 14 of 18 F1—F6 Pg291 Project r: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 27. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 28. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 29. Prior to issuance rof a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 30. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 31. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 32. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 33. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 34. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 35. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. Printed: 11/28/2017 vnvw.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 18 F1—F6 Pg292 Project;#: SUB T PiV119823 DRC2017-00402, DRC20'17-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section Vil — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility 'Safety Factors". 39. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 11/28/2017 wAvw.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 18 F146 Pg293 Project: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. GROUNDWATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific water quality management plan shall specifically addressed items: a., b., c., d., and I., above. Printed: 11128/2017 w w.CityofRC.us Page 17 of IS F1—F6 Pg294 Project#: SUBTPIM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni X 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 43. The permitted grading plan and the final project -specific water quality management plan are proposing stormwater detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. Printed; 1112812017 www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 18 F1-1`6 Pg295 RESOLUTION NO. 17-102 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2017-00405, A PROPOSAL TO REMOVE EXISTING TREES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF THREE (3) INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS WITH A COMBINED FLOOR AREA OF 293,283 SQUARE FEET ON A PARCEL OF ABOUT 13.96 ACRES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF UTICA AVENUE AND 4TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0210-081-43. A. Recitals. 1. CP Logistics Utica, LLC filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of December 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on December 13, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue and is comprised of one (1) parcel with a combined area of 13.96 acres and is currently undeveloped. The parcel is surrounded to the north, south and east by partial right-of-way improvements, including 4th Street, Utica Avenue, Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North, and is surrounded to the west by a vacant undeveloped vineyard; and b. To the east, across Utica Avenue, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently reviewing a Design Review (DRC2016-00670) and a Specific Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00931) for a proposed industrial building on that property. To the south, across 4th Street within the City of Ontario, is a residential apartment complex. To the west, at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently processing a Design Review (DRC2017-00205) and a Development Code Amendment (DRC2017-00204) for the proposed development of two hotels and a future restaurant pad on that property. The zoning of the subject property and the properties to the north is Industrial F1—F6 Pg296 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-102 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2017-00405 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 PAGE 2 Park (IP) District. The zoning of the properties to the west is Industrial Park (IP) District and Haven Avenue Overlay District (HAOD). The zoning of the properties to the east is Empire Lakes Specific Plan Area 5. The zoning of the property to the south is Urban Residential District (Ontario Center Specific Plan), which is within the jurisdiction of the City of Ontario; and C. The applicant proposes to remove a total of fifteen (15) trees along the northern perimeter of the subject property. The tree species that are proposed to be removed consist of Aleppo Pine and Red Ironbark. The trees range in height from 32 feet to 60 feet. Of these, a total of eleven (11) trees were determined to be heritage trees based on an assessment provided in an arborist report that was prepared by Evergreen Arborist Consultants on April 25, 2017. The removal will not affect the established character of the area and the property values as the proposal involves replacing the trees at a 1:1 ratio; and d. The trees are not designated as historically significant; and e. The trees are not noted in any Specific Plan, Community Plan or condition of approval for a previously approved project; and f. It is necessaryto remove the trees in order to construct improvements which allow economic enjoyment of the property; and g. It is necessary to remove the trees to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way. The location of the trees conflict with the required installation of the remaining street improvements, including the sidewalk; and h. The trees may be preserved by pruning and proper maintenance or relocation rather than removal. However, the applicant has proposed to replace the subject trees with a combination of Southern Magnolia and Afghan Pines, which are anticipated to assist in providing better screening of the trailer storage area for Building 3; and The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource of the city; and j. The Applicant proposes to install a total of 238 trees throughout the parking lot and along the perimeter of the site; and k. The project also involves a proposal to subdivide the site into three (3) parcels and develop the entire 13.96-acre site with three (3) industrial logistics buildings, parking, landscaping and remaining street improvements along the southern, eastern and northern perimeter of the site. The related entitlements include Design Review DRC2017-00402, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017- 00404, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406 and Minor Exception DRC2017-00408. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Industrial Park. The General Plan states that Industrial Park land use designation accommodates master planned concentrations of light industrial, research and development, green technology and general or medical uses. The project is for the development of F146 Pg297 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-102 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2017-00405 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 PAGE 3 a 3-building industrial complex, in consistent with the intent of the General Plan's Industrial Park land use designation; and b. The proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The Municipal Code allows for industrial development within the Industrial Park (IP) District. The Municipal Code also allows for the removal of trees to be applied for in conjunction with development projects; and C. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The Development Code requires trees that are being removed to be replaced with trees of a similar size and species. The project involves the installation of 24-inch box trees along the north perimeter in place of the existing trees which is consistent with the City's tree replacement policy. Additionally, the proposal includes two Minor Exceptions, one (DRC2017-00406) for a reduction in the required average landscape setback and one (DRC2017-00408) for an increase in the maximum permitted wall height. With approval of these related exceptions, the project will be consistent with the Development Code; and d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed project includes the installation of 248 trees throughout the parking lot and around the perimeter of the site, which is anticipated to improve the aesthetics of the site and will not create any public health and safety issues. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public F1—F6 Pg298 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-102 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2017-00405 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 PAGE 4 Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Environmental Mitigation Biological Resources 1) Burrowing Owl Pre -Construction Survey: A qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction presence/absence survey for burrowing owl(s) within 30 days of scheduled site disturbance. Project site disturbance may proceed once the qualified biologist confirms no burrowing owl(s) or sign (molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement) are present on site. If burrowing owl(s) or sign are observed during the pre -construction presence/absence survey, the qualified biologist will monitor the burrow(s) for up to two weeks to determine if the burrow(s) are occupied. If the burrow(s) are occupied, the qualified biologist will coordinate burrowing owl avoidance and/or passive relocation in conjunction with CDFW. If the qualified biologist confirms at the expiration of the two -week period that there is no burrowing owl onsite, construction/site disturbance activities may commence. 2) Nesting Bird Pre -Construction Survey: Vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities should be conducted outside of the nesting season (January 15 to August 31). If these activities occur during nesting season, then a qualified biologist will conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including tree and shrub removal, disking, demolition activities, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the nests depending on the level of activity within the buffer and species detected, and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. Raptor species will have an avoidance buffer of 500 feet and other bird species will have an avoidance buffer of 300 feet. These buffers may be reduced in consultation with the CDFW. If active nests are not identified, vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities may be commenced. F1-176 Pg299 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-102 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2017-00405 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 PAGE 5 Cultural Resources 1) Paleontological Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and/or action that would permit project site disturbance (whichever occurs first), the applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department that the applicant has retained a qualified paleontologist to address unanticipated discoveries. The paleontologist shall attend all pre- grading meetings and shall monitor daily grading/construction operations from the commencement of ground disturbance activities to the procurement of certified building pads by the project's civil engineer and geotechnical engineer, as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If previously unidentified paleontological resources are uncovered during site preparation, grading, or excavation, the paleontological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt or divert grading in the immediate area of the discovery and to evaluate the resources. If the paleontologist determines that they are unique paleontological resources as defined by Section 21083.2 of CEQA, then the paleontologist shall conduct additional excavations to avoid impacts to these resources by the development. If they are not "unique" then no further mitigation would be required. Unique cultural resources shall be determined based on the criteria set forth in Section 21083.2 of CEQA. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, or any permit authorizing ground disturbance, the project applicant shall, to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director, demonstrate that the following note is included on any grading plans: If human skeletal remains are uncovered during construction, the contractor (depending on the project component) shall immediately halt work within 50 feet of the find, contact the San Bernardino County coroner to evaluate the remains, and follow the procedures and protocols set forth in Section 15064.5(e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the County Coroner shall contact the NAHC, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the contractor shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the contractor has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. F1—F6 Pg300 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-102 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2017-00405 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 PAGE 6 Noise 1) Construction Noise Monitoring and Temporary Noise Barriers: Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the adjacent property line. During construction, the applicant shall perform weekly noise level monitoring. The findings of the noise monitoring shall be reported to the Building Official and City Planning Department on a monthly basis; however, the Building Official and City Planning Department must be notified immediately if noise levels exceed 70 dBA per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050. If noise levels exceed 70 dBA at the adjacent property line, construction activities shall be halted, reduced in intensity to a level of compliance, or temporary construction noise barriers shall be used. If temporary construction noise barriers are used, they shall comply with the following criteria or as otherwise approved by the Building Official and City Planning Department: Temporary construction noise barriers shall be installed and maintained by the construction contractor along the property line such that they block the line of sight between the construction equipment and the adjacent uses. The temporary construction noise barriers shall be a minimum height of 12 feet high. The temporary construction noise barriers shall be solid from the ground to the top of the barrier. The temporary construction noise barriers shall have a weight of at least 2.5 pounds per square foot, which is equivalent to'/< inch thick plywood. To avoid objectionable noise reflections, the source side of the temporary construction noise barrier shall be lined with an acoustic absorption material meeting a noise reduction coefficient rating of 0.70 or greater in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials Test Method C423. Transportation/Traffic 1) Haven Avenue at 4th Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street to north Haven Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this improvement. 2) Milliken Avenue at 4th Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street to north Milliken Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this improvement. F1—F6 Pg301 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-102 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2017-00405 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 PAGE 7 Tribal Cultural Resources 1) Discovery of Human Remains: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. 2) Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources: In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AM ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: F1—F6 Pg302 Conditions of Approval Rnrlceo Ctr+ntoncA Community Development Department Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception. Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please Ise advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for: 1) The subdivision of one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823) in conjunction with a related development located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 2) The construction of an industrial development (Design Review DRC2017-00402) consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 3) The formation of a Uniform Sign Program (Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404) related to a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 4) A Tree Removal Permit (Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405) request to remove eleven (11) heritage trees in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 5) A Minor Exception (Minor Exception DRC2017-00406) to reduce the required setback for average depth of landscape along Fourth Street and Utica Avenue by a maximum of ten (10%) percent in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 6) A Minor Exception (Minor Exception DRC2017-00408) to increase the height of the screen wall along Trademark North Parkway by a maximum of 2 feet in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. Printed: 11/28/2017 www.CityofRC.us F1-F6 Pg303 Project 9: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of -sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on -site to match the building. 3. All ground -mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back -flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on -center. All ground -mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 4. The employee break area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the building, and tables, chairs/benches, and waste receptacles shall be provided. 5. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. Where tubular steel wrought iron sliding gates are used, they shall be backed by solid or perforated metal sheeting painted to match the fence or gate. 6. All outdoor lighting shall be recessed and/or constructed with full downward shielding in order to reduce light and glare impacts on trespass to adjoining properties and public rights -of -way. Each fixture shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights -of -way, so that no light fixture directly illuminates an area outside of the project site intended to be illuminated. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Approval of Tentative Parcel No. 19823 is granted subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 9. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval with Conditions all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and ar e Printed: 1112812017 1www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 18 F1—F6 Pg304 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni !// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 11. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 12. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 13. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 14. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 15. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 16. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 17. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 18. A detailed on -site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 19.Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 20. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. Printed: 11128/2017 w vw.CltyofRC.us Page 3 of 18 F1-1`6 Pg305 Project f : SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni 1/13 Industrial Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 22. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 23. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 24. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 25. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 26. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 27, Perimeter and parking lot landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees within the public right-of-way. 28. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 29. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 30. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. Printed: 1112812017 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 18 F1—F6 Pg306 Project : SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 32. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 33. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. characteristics of the selected tree species. and submitted for Planning Director review and These criteria shall encourage the natural growth 34. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 35. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment and shall be architecturally compatible to the buildings onsite. The walls shall be comprised of the same material as the primary building material or shall be constructed of decorative masonry blocks with a decorative finish such as stucco textured to match a concrete tilt up wall. 36. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 37. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 38. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 39. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of BuildingPermits. 40. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 41. All vehicle driveways shall be decorative in design consistent with the approved plans. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed: 11/28/2017 Page 5 of 18 F1—F6 Pg307 Project: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Traffic Requirements: 1. 4th Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards as required and including: A. Protect or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, traffic signal equipment, and signing & striping as required. B. Provide a bus bay -right turn lane into the project site per City Standard Plan 119. C. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including minimum driveway approach widths, distance from intersections, and spacing from other driveways. D. Modify curb ramps to the latest ADA standards. 2. Utica Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Industrial Collector° standards as required and including: A. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. B. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including stacking distance, approach widths, and driveway distance from an intersection. 3. Bentley Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Collector with Median' standards as required and including: A. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. B. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including driveway approach width. 4. Trademark Parkway North frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Collector with Median" standards as required and including: D. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. E. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including driveway approach width. F. Show sight lines for the driveway along Trademark Parkway. A no -build easement may be required to provide adequate line of sight. Tree removals may be required along Trademark median 2. Provide a bus bay -right turn lane into the project site on 4th Street per City Standard Plan 119. 3. Reciprocal access easements from the lots to the west for the benefit of parcel 1 and parcel 3 shall be recorded prior to approval of the final map. 4. The City of Ontario will need to approve all direct connections to the 4th Street storm drain. All drainage studies that impact their downstream facilities will be routed to the City of Ontario for review. Coordinate with the City of Ontario to get a better understanding of their requirements. 5. The pavement on 4th Street is scheduled to be rehabilitated due to it's condition. Coordinate with the capital improvements department for timing of the improvements. 6. Development impact fees will be collected upon issuance of the building permit per the engineering fee schedule. Note that fees are subject to change annually. Printed: 1112812017 w W.cityofRcros Page 6 of 18 F1-1`6 Pg308 Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 7. The existing ramps located at the southwest corner of Bentley and Utica and the northwest corner of Utica and Fourth shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If any ramp does not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramp for compliance. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit or approval of final subdivision map whichever occurs first. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 8. Update plan 1365 for the work on Utica, Bentley, and Trademark Parkway. Provide new plans for the work on Fourth Street 9. Per Resolution No. 87-96: All developments, except those contained in section 7 and others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development. The 66kV lines do not need to be undergrounded. The poles supporting the 66kV lines shall be moved to accommodate the location of proposed curbs, driveways, bus bays, etc. 10. The street lights shall be LS-2 type and owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. Street light design shall be supplemental to the public improvement plans. 11. Vacate a portion of Trademark Parkway south of Bentley. The existing public improvements shall be removed from that area. Coordinate with SCE for the removal of the existing street light. Provide evidence that all public utilities are removed or relocated prior to the vacation. No public access to the vacated area of Trademark Parkway shall be allowed. Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 13. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards, 14. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 41 total feet on Trademark Parkway North 41 total feet on Bentley Street 33 total feet on Utica Avenue 60 total feet on Fourth Street 15. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 16. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. Printed: 11128/2017 vAvw.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 18 F146 Pg309 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 18. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 19. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 20. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 21. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first, for: Parcel 1 and the lot to the west Parcel 3 and the lot to the west 22. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 23. Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development on Fourth, Utica, Bentley, and Trademark Parkway. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, along with three 1 114" innerducts in one of the 4" conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber -to -the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to final map approval. Printed: 11128t2017 www.CityofRC,us Page 6 of 18 F146 Pg310 Project;?: SUBTPM'19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 25. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage Flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. Printed: 11/28/2017 www.CityofRC,us Page 9 of 18 F146 Pg311 Project 4: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC20-17-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 26.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 27.Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 28. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 29. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 30. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Printed: 11/28/2017 vnvw.CityofRC.us Page 10 oft 8 F1—F6 Pg312 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical development. for electric service and shall construct agreement and shall construct electrical and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho service provider for all project related 32. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 33. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 34. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 35. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final' map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as proposed. Additional FD Access doors are required on all the proposed buildings; FD Access doors spacing shall not exceed 100'. If the buildings are divided into suites, riser access to the building must be provided to all tenants served by the system from the exterior of the building without entering another suite; Maximum Travel distance is limited to 250' without smoke hatches. The Fire Standards and Guidance Documents are available on the City's web site www.cityofrc.us follow the path from the home page to city hall/fire district/prevention/fire code standards. Printed: 112812017 www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 18 F1—F6 Pg313 Project SUBTPiM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panaffoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural Calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 11l282o17 Page 12 of 18 F1—F6 Pg314 Project;#: SUBTPM19323 DP,C2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni U/ 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program, ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 13, Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the Current adopted California Building Code. 17. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; I) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; III) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Printed: 712�nr;mCityofRC.us 8/2017 � Page 13 of 18 F1—F6 Pg315 Project4: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N/ 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Utica Avenue and Fourth Street) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 21, Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 22. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 23. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 24. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. Printed: 11/28/2017 wtvw.CityofRC.us Page to of 18 F1—F6 Pg316 Project: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-d0406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 27. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 28. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 29. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 30. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 31. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Well infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 32. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 33. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 34. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 35. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. Printed: 11128/2017 wnvw.CityofRC.us page 15 of 16 F146 Pg317 Project #: SUB T PM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-004N, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 39. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 11128120V =1W.CityofRc.us Page 16 of 13 F1—F6 Pg318 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bemardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78) repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment 'BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific water quality management plan shall specifically addressed items: a., b., c., d., and I., above. Printed: 11/28/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 18 F1—F6 Pg319 Project#: SUB T PIM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 43. The permitted grading plan and the final project -specific water quality management plan are proposing stormwater detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. Printed: f 12www.CityofRC.us8l2017 Page 18 of 18 F1—F6 Pg320 RESOLUTION NO.17-103 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00406, A PROPOSAL TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SETBACK FOR AVERAGE DEPTH OF LANDSCAPE ALONG 4TH STREET AND UTICA AVENUE BY A MAXIMUM OF TEN (10%) PERCENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00402 FOR A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF THREE (3) INDUSTRIAL LOGISTICS BUILDINGS WITH A COMBINED FLOOR AREA OF 293,283 SQUARE FEET ON A PARCEL OF ABOUT 13.96 ACRES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF UTICA AVENUE AND 4TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0210-081-43. A. Recitals 1. CP Logistics Utica, LLC filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of December 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on December 13, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue and is comprised of one (1) parcel with a combined area of 13.96 acres and is currently undeveloped. The parcel is surrounded to the north, south and east by partial right-of-way improvements, including 4th Street, Utica Avenue, Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North, and is surrounded to the west by a vacant undeveloped vineyard; and b. The site has a General Plan land use designation of Industrial Park and is located within the Industrial Park (IP) District; and C. To the east, across Utica Avenue, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently reviewing a Design Review (DRC2016-00670) and a Specific Plan Amendment (DRC2016-00931) for a proposed industrial building on that property. To the south, F1—F6 Pg321 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.17-103 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00406 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 PAGE 2 across 4th Street within the City of Ontario, is a residential apartment complex. To the west, at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently processing a Design Review (DRC2017-00205) and a Development Code Amendment (DRC2017-00204) for the proposed development of two hotels and a future restaurant pad on that property. The zoning of the subject property and the properties to the north is Industrial Park (IP) District. The zoning of the properties to the west is Industrial Park (IP) District and Haven Avenue Overlay District (HAOD). The zoning of the properties to the east is Empire Lakes Specific Plan Area 5. The zoning of the property to the south is Urban Residential District (Ontario Center Specific Plan), which is within the jurisdiction of the City of Ontario; and d. The applicant proposes to reduce the required setback for average depth of landscape along 4th Street by 10 percent; and e. The Development Code allows for a Minor Exception application to be submitted for a reduction of up to 10 percent of a required setback; and f. The required average landscape depth is 45 feet. However, the proposed average landscape depth is 40 feet — 6 inches; and g. Per the tabulation section of the site plan, the project is in compliance with the required average depth of landscaping along Utica Avenue, Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North, as required by Table 17.36.040-2. However, because of the installation of the two right turn lanes along 4th Street, the required average depth of landscaping is short by 4 feet — 6 inches; and h. This application is being proposed in conjunction with a proposal to subdivide the subject property into three (3) new parcels (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823) and construct three (3) industrial buildings totaling 235,325 square feet (Design Review DRC2017-00402); and i. The project also involves applications for a Uniform Sign Program (DRC2017- 00404) to establish sign criteria for the proposed development, a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2017- 00405) to remove existing heritage trees from the project site and Minor Exception (DRC2017- 00408) to increase the maximum wall height by 2 feet for a screen wall along Trademark Parkway North. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan. The reduction in the required average landscape depth will permit the project site to be developed at the maximum density permitted by General Plan. b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed industrial development is consistent in design and is compatible to the industrial development within the general vicinity. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The reduction in required average depth of landscaping is necessary due to the location of the curb face along the right turn lanes along 4th Street. If the F1-176 Pg322 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.17-103 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00406 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 PAGE 3 Applicant was not required to construct the Improvements, the Applicant would be capable of complying with the average depth of landscape of forty-five feet (45') along 4th Street. The exception will allow for the development of the project site at the permitted density. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. The proposed reduction in the required building setback is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to reduce the required setback by up to 10 percent where it has been demonstrated that there are unusual circumstances. In this case, the proposed Minor Exception is only requested by the Applicant to allow for the Applicant to comply with the required average depth of landscape along the 4th & Utica project's 4th Street frontage. The inability to comply with this setback requirement was solely caused by the City of Rancho Cucamonga's requirement to construct the improvements. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the F1—F6 Pg323 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.17-103 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00406 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 PAGE 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Environmental Mitigation Biological Resources 1) Burrowing Owl Pre -Construction Survey: A qualified biologist will conduct a preconstructioh presence/absence survey for burrowing owl(s) within 30 days of scheduled site disturbance. Project site disturbance may proceed once the qualified biologist confirms no burrowing owl(s) or sign (molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement) are present on site. If burrowing owl(s) or sign are observed during the pre -construction presence/absence survey, the qualified biologist will monitor the burrow(s) for up to two weeks to determine if the burrow(s) are occupied. If the burrow(s) are occupied, the qualified biologist will coordinate burrowing owl avoidance and/or passive relocation in conjunction with CDFW. If the qualified biologist confirms at the expiration of the two -week period that there is no burrowing owl onsite, construction/site disturbance activities may commence. 2) Nesting Bird Pre -Construction Survey: Vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities should be conducted outside of the nesting season (January 15 to August 31). If these activities occur during nesting season, then a qualified biologist will conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including tree and shrub removal, disking, demolition activities, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the nests depending on the level of activity within the buffer and species detected, and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. Raptor species will have an avoidance buffer of 500 feet and other bird species will have an avoidance buffer of 300 feet. These buffers may be reduced in consultation with the CDFW. If active nests are not identified, vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities may be commenced. Cultural Resources 1) Paleontological Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and/or action that would permit project site disturbance (whichever occurs first), the applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department that the applicant has retained a qualified paleontologist to address unanticipated F146 Pg324 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.17-103 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00406 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 PAGE 5 discoveries. The paleontologist shall attend all pre- grading meetings and shall monitor daily grading/construction operations from the commencement of ground disturbance activities to the procurement of certified building pads by the project's civil engineer and geotechnical engineer, as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If previously unidentified paleontological resources are uncovered during site preparation, grading, or excavation, the paleontological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt or divert grading in the immediate area of the discovery and to evaluate the resources. If the paleontologist determines that they are unique paleontological resources as defined by Section 21083.2 of CEQA, then the paleontologist shall conduct additional excavations to avoid impacts to these resources by the development. If they are not "unique" then no further mitigation would be required. Unique cultural resources shall be determined based on the criteria set forth in Section 21083.2 of CEQA. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, or any permit authorizing ground disturbance, the project applicant shall, to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director, demonstrate that the following note is included on any grading plans: If human skeletal remains are uncovered during construction, the contractor (depending on the project component) shall immediately halt work within 50 feet of the find, contact the San Bernardino County coroner to evaluate the remains, and follow the procedures and protocols set forth in Section 15064.5(e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the County Coroner shall contact the NAHC, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the contractor shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the contractor has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Noise 1) Construction Noise Monitoring and Temporary Noise Barriers: Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the adjacent property line. During construction, the applicant shall perform weekly noise level monitoring. The findings of the noise monitoring shall be reported to the Building Official and City Planning Department on a monthly basis; however, the Building Official and City Planning Department must be notified immediately if noise levels exceed 70 dBA per the City of Rancho F1—F6 Pg325 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.17-103 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00406 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 PAGE 6 Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050. If noise levels exceed 70 dBA at the adjacent property line, construction activities shall be halted, reduced in intensity to a level of compliance, or temporary construction noise barriers shall be used. If temporary construction noise barriers are used, they shall comply with the following criteria or as otherwise approved by the Building Official and City Planning Department: Temporary construction noise barriers shall be installed and maintained by the construction contractor along the property line such that they block the line of sight between the construction equipment and the adjacent uses. The temporary construction noise barriers shall be a minimum height of 12 feet high. The temporary construction noise barriers shall be solid from the ground to the top of the barrier. The temporary construction noise barriers shall have a weight of at least 2.5 pounds per square foot, which is equivalent to % inch thick plywood. To avoid objectionable noise reflections, the source side of the temporary construction noise barrier shall be lined with an acoustic absorption material meeting a noise reduction coefficient rating of 0.70 or greater in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials Test Method C423. Transportation/Traffic 1) Haven Avenue at 4th Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street to north Haven Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this improvement. 2) Milliken Avenue at 4th Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street to north Milliken Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this improvement. Tribal Cultural Resources 1) Discovery of Human Remains: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. 2) Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources: In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior F1—F6 Pg326 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.17-103 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00406 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 PAGE 7 standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MR Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: F1—F6 Pg327 La. Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for: 1) The subdivision of one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823) in conjunction with a related development located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 2) The construction of an industrial development (Design Review DRC2017-00402) consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 3) The formation of a Uniform Sign Program (Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404) related to a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 4) A Tree Removal Permit (Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405) request to remove eleven (11) heritage trees in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 5) A Minor Exception (Minor Exception DRC2017-00406) to reduce the required setback for average depth of landscape along Fourth Street and Utica Avenue by a maximum of ten (10%) percent in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 6) A Minor Exception (Minor Exception DRC2017-00408) to increase the height of the screen wall along Trademark North Parkway by a maximum of 2 feet in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. Printed. 11282017 www.CityofRC.us F1—F6 Pg328 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of -sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on -site to match the building. 3. All ground -mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back -flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on -center. All ground -mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 4. The employee break area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the building, and tables, chairs/benches, and waste receptacles shall be provided. 5. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. Where tubular steel wrought iron sliding gates are used, they shall be backed by solid or perforated metal sheeting painted to match the fence or gate. 6. All outdoor lighting shall be recessed and/or constructed with full downward shielding in order to reduce light and glare impacts on trespass to adjoining properties and public rights -of -way. Each fixture shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights -of -way, so that no light fixture directly illuminates an area outside of the project site intended to be illuminated. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Approval of Tentative Parcel No. 19823 is granted subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 9. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval with Conditions all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and ar e w W.CityofRcros Printed: 11/28/2017 Page 2 of 18 F1—F6 Pg329 Project#: SUSTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 11. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 12. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 13. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 14. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 15. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 16. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 17. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 18. A detailed on -site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 19.Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 20. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. Printed: 11128/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 18 F1—F6 Pg330 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni 1/13 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 22. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 23. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 24. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 25. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 26. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 27. Perimeter and parking lot landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees within the public right-of-way. 28. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 29, Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 30. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. Printed: Nwww.CityofRC.us128/2017 Page 4 of 18 F1—F6 Pg331 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buil Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 32. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 33. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 34. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 35. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment and shall be architecturally compatible to the buildings onsite. The walls shall be comprised of the same material as the primary building material or shall be constructed of decorative masonry blocks with a decorative finish such as stucco textured to match a concrete tilt up wall. 36. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 37. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 38. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 39. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 40. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 41. All vehicle driveways shall be decorative in design consistent with the approved plans. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed: 1112812017 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 18 F1—F6 Pg332 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Traffic Requirements: 1. 4th Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards as required and including: A. Protect or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, traffic signal equipment, and signing & striping as required. B. Provide a bus bay -right turn lane into the project site per City Standard Plan 119. C. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including minimum driveway approach widths, distance from intersections, and spacing from other driveways. D. Modify curb ramps to the latest ADA standards. 2. Utica Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Industrial Collector" standards as required and including: A. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. B. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including stacking distance, approach widths, and driveway distance from an intersection. 3. Bentley Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Collector with Median" standards as required and including: A. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. B. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including driveway approach width. 4. Trademark Parkway North frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Collector with Median" standards as required and including: D. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. E. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including driveway approach width. F. Show sight lines for the driveway along Trademark Parkway. A no -build easement may be required to provide adequate line of sight. Tree removals may be required along Trademark median 2. Provide a bus bay -right turn lane into the project site on 4th Street per City Standard Plan 119. 3. Reciprocal access easements from the lots to the west for the benefit of parcel 1 and parcel 3 shall be recorded prior to approval of the final map. 4. The City of Ontario will need to approve all direct connections to the 4th Street storm drain. All drainage studies that impact their downstream facilities will be routed to the City of Ontario for review. Coordinate with the City of Ontario to get a better understanding of their requirements. 5. The pavement on 4th Street is scheduled to be rehabilitated due to it's condition. Coordinate with the capital improvements department for timing of the improvements. 6. Development impact fees will be collected upon issuance of the building permit per the engineering fee schedule. Note that fees are subject to change annually. www.CityofRC.us Printed:ll/2812017 Page 6 of 18 F1—F6 Pg333 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 7. The existing ramps located at the southwest corner of Bentley and Utica and the northwest corner of Utica and Fourth shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If any ramp does not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramp for compliance. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit or approval of final subdivision map whichever occurs first. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 8. Update plan 1365 for the work on Utica, Bentley, and Trademark Parkway. Provide new plans for the work on Fourth Street 9. Per Resolution No. 87-96: All developments, except those Contained in section 7 and others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development. The 66kV lines do not need to be undergrounded. The poles supporting the 66kV lines shall be moved to accommodate the location of proposed curbs, driveways, bus bays, etc. 10. The street lights shall be LS-2 type and owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. Street light design shall be supplemental to the public improvement plans. 11. Vacate a portion of Trademark Parkway south of Bentley. The existing public improvements shall be removed from that area. Coordinate with SCE for the removal of the existing street light. Provide evidence that all public utilities are removed or relocated prior to the vacation. No public access to the vacated area of Trademark Parkway shall be allowed. Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 13, Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 14. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 41 total feet on Trademark Parkway North 41 total feet on Bentley Street 33 total feet on Utica Avenue 60 total feet on Fourth Street 15. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 16. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. Printed: 11128/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 18 F1—F6 Pg334 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2D17-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 18. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 19. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 20. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 21. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first, for: Parcel 1 and the lot to the west Parcel 3 and the lot to the west 22. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 23. Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development 'on Fourth, Utica, Bentley, and Trademark Parkway. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, along with three 1 1/d" innerducts in one of the 4" conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber -to -the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to final map approval. Printed: 11128/2017 w W.CilyofRC.us Page 8 of 18 F1—F6 Pg335 Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 25. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. 'Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees, shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 9 Printed:ll/2&2017 www.CityofR.C.us Page 9 of 18 F1—F6 Pg336 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 26.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 27.Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines' of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 28. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 29. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 30. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Prinked: 17128/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 18 F1—F6 Pg337 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shallconstruct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. 32. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 33. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 34. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 35. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as proposed. Additional FD Access doors are required on all the proposed buildings; FD Access doors spacing shall not exceed 100'. If the buildings are divided into suites, riser access to the building must be provided to all tenants served by the system from the exterior of the building without entering another suite; Maximum Travel distance is limited to 250' without smoke hatches. The Fire Standards and Guidance Documents are available on the City's web site www.cityofrc.us follow the path from the home page to city hall/fire district/prevention/fire code standards. Printed: 11/28/2017 www.CityofRC,us Page 11 of 18 F1—F6 Pg338 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Building and SafetV Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout `Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. Printed: 11128/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 78 F1—F6 Pg339 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-OD406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial B Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; Ili) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Printed: 1112MO17 www.CityofRC.us Page 13 or 18 F146 Pg340 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Utica Avenue and Fourth Street) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 21. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 22. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 23. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 24. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. Printed! 11/28/2017 w w.CityotRC.us Page 14 of 18 F1—F6 Pg341 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 27. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 28. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum. of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 29. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 30. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 31. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 32. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 33. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 34. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 35. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. Printed: 11/28/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 18 F1—F6 Pg342 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni !// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 39. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 11/28/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 18 F146 Pg343 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)} must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78) repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment 'BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. I. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific water quality management plan shall specifically addressed items: a., b., c., d., and I., above. Printed: 11/28/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 18 F1—F6 Pg344 Project#: SUBTPM19323 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 43. The permitted grading plan and the final project -specific water quality management plan are proposing stormwater detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. Printed: 11/28/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 18 F146 Pg345 RESOLUTION NO.17-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00408, A PROPOSAL TO INCREASE THE HEIGHT OF THE SCREEN WALL ALONG TRADEMARK NORTH PARKWAY BY A MAXIMUM OF 2 FEET IN CONJUNCTION WITH DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00402 FOR A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF THREE (3) INDUSTRIAL LOGISTICS BUILDINGS WITH A COMBINED FLOOR AREA OF 293,283 SQUARE FEET ON A PARCEL OF ABOUT 13.96 ACRES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF UTICA AVENUE AND 4TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0210-081-43. A. Recitals 1. CP Logistics Utica, LLC filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2017-00408, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of December 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on December 13, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue and is comprised of one (1) parcelwith a combined area of 13.96 acres and is currently undeveloped. The parcel is surrounded to the north, south and east by partial right-of-way improvements, including 4th Street, Utica Avenue, Bentley Street and Trademark Parkway North, and is surrounded to the west by a vacant undeveloped vineyard; and b. The site has a General Plan land use designation of Industrial Park and is located within the Industrial Park (IP) District; and C. To the east, across Utica Avenue, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently reviewing a Design Review (DRC2016-00670) and a Specific Plan F1—F6 Pg346 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.17-104 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00406 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 2 Amendment (DRC2016-00931) for a proposed industrial building on that property. To the south, across 4th Street within the City of Ontario, is a residential apartment complex. To the west, at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street, is a vacant undeveloped site. The Planning Department is currently processing a Design Review (DRC2017-00205) and a Development Code Amendment (DRC2017-00204) for the proposed development of two hotels and a future restaurant pad on that property. The zoning of the subject property and the properties to the north is Industrial Park (IP) District. The zoning of the properties to the west is Industrial Park (IP) District and Haven Avenue Overlay District (HAOD). The zoning of the properties to the east is Empire Lakes Specific Plan Area 5. The zoning of the property to the south is Urban Residential District (Ontario Center Specific Plan), which is within the jurisdiction of the City of Ontario; and d. The applicant proposes to increase the height of the screen wall along Trademark North Parkway by 2 feet for a total height of 5 feet measured from the north side of the wall; and e. Per Table 17.36.040-2, street frontage walls are required to have a maximum height of 3 feet. However, the Development Code allows for a Minor Exception to be applied for to increase the height of a wall be up to 2 feet; and f. Because of the odd shape of the site along the north end of the site, the placement of the, the screen wall at the north end of Parcel 3 was placed within the setback area. However, since the intent is to screen the dock area from public view, the applicant is requesting,to construct the 5-foot tall wall to provide adequate screening of the trailer storage area; and g. According to the section drawings provided on the site plan, a landscape berm will be installed adjacent to the wall, which will further assist in the screening of this area; and h. This application is being proposed in conjunction with a proposal to subdivide the subject property into three (3) new parcels (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823) and construct three (3) industrial buildings totaling 235,325 square feet (Design Review DRC2017-00402); and i. The project also involves applications for a Uniform Sign Program (DRC2017- 00404) to establish sign criteria for the proposed development, a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2017- 00405) to remove existing heritage trees from the project site and a Minor Exception (DRC2017- 00406) to reduce the required average landscape depth along 4th Street by 10 percent. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan. The reduction in the required average landscape depth will permit the project site to be developed at the maximum density permitted by General Plan. b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed industrial development is consistent in design and is compatible to the industrial development within the general vicinity. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to F1—F6 Pg347 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.17-104 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00406 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 3 accommodate unique site conditions. The reduction in required average depth of landscaping is necessary due to the location of the curb face along the right turn lanes along 4th Street. If the Applicant was not required to construct the Improvements, the Applicant would be capable of complying with the average depth of landscape of forty-five feet (45') along 4th Street. The exception will allow for the development of the project site at the permitted density. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. The proposed reduction in the required building setback is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to reduce the required setback by up to 10 percent where it has been demonstrated that there are unusual circumstances. In this case, the proposed Minor Exception is only requested by the Applicant to allow for the Applicant to comply with the required average depth of landscape along the 4th & Utica project's 4th Street frontage. The inability to comply with this setback requirement was solely caused by the City of Rancho Cucamonga's requirement to construct the Improvements. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings; the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings F1—F6 Pg348 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.17-104 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00406 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 4 upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Environmental Mitigation Biological Resources 1) Burrowing Owl Pre -Construction Survey: A qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction presence/absence survey for burrowing owl(s) within 30 days of scheduled site disturbance. Project site disturbance may proceed once the qualified biologist confirms no burrowing owl(s) or sign (molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement) are present on site. If burrowing owl(s) or sign are observed during the pre -construction presence/absence survey, the qualified biologist will monitor the burrow(s) for up to two weeks to determine if the burrow(s) are occupied. If the burrow(s) are occupied, the qualified biologist will coordinate burrowing owl avoidance and/or passive relocation in conjunction with CDFW. If the qualified biologist confirms at the expiration of the two -week period that there is no burrowing owl onsite, construction/site disturbance activities may commence. 2) Nesting Bird Pre -Construction Survey: Vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities should be conducted outside of the nesting season (January 15 to August 31). If these activities occur during nesting season, then a qualified biologist will conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including tree and shrub removal, disking, demolition activities, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the nests depending on the level of activity within the buffer and species detected, and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. Raptor species will have an avoidance buffer of 500 feet and other bird species will have an avoidance buffer of 300 feet. These buffers may be reduced in consultation with the CDFW. If active nests are not identified, vegetation clearing and ground disturbing activities may be commenced. Cultural Resources 1) Paleontological Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and/or action that would permit project site disturbance (whichever occurs first), the applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of F146 Pg349 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.17-104 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00406 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 5 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department that the applicant has retained a qualified paleontologist to address unanticipated discoveries. The paleontologist shall attend all pre- grading meetings and shall monitor daily grading/construction operations from the commencement of ground disturbance activities to the procurement of certified building pads by the project's civil engineer and geotechnical engineer, as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If previously unidentified paleontological resources are uncovered during site preparation, grading, or excavation, the paleontological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt or divert grading in the immediate area of the discovery and to evaluate the resources. If the paleontologist determines that they are unique paleontological resources as defined by Section 21083.2 of CEQA, then the paleontologist shall conduct additional excavations to avoid impacts to these resources by the development. If they are not "unique" then no further mitigation would be required. Unique cultural resources shall be determined based on the criteria set forth in Section 21083.2 of CEQA. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, or any permit authorizing ground disturbance, the project applicant shall, to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director, demonstrate that the following note is included on any grading plans: If human skeletal remains are uncovered during construction, the contractor (depending on the project component) shall immediately halt work within 50 feet of the find, contact the San Bernardino County coroner to evaluate the remains, and follow the procedures and protocols set forth in Section 15064.5(e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the County Coroner shall contact the NAHC, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the contractor shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the contractor has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Noise 1) Construction Noise Monitoring and Temporary Noise Barriers: Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the adjacent property line. During construction, the applicant shall perform weekly noise level monitoring. The findings of the noise monitoring shall be reported to the Building Official and City Planning Department on a monthly basis; however, the F1—F6 Pg350 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.17-104 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00406 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 6 Building Official and City Planning Department must be notified immediately if noise levels exceed 70 dBA per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050. If noise levels exceed 70 dBA at the adjacent property line, construction activities shall be halted, reduced in intensity to a level of compliance, or temporary construction noise barriers shall be used. If temporary construction noise barriers are used, they shall comply with the following criteria or as otherwise approved by the Building Official and City Planning Department: Temporary construction noise barriers shall be installed and maintained by the construction contractor along the property'line such that they block the line of sight between the construction equipment and the adjacent uses. • The temporary construction noise barriers shall be a minimum height of 12 feet high. • The temporary construction noise barriers shall be solid from the ground to the top of the barrier. • The temporary construction noise barriers shall have a weight of at least 2.5 pounds per square foot, which is equivalent to'/ inch thick plywood. • To avoid objectionable noise reflections, the source side of the temporary construction noise barrier shall be lined with an acoustic absorption material meeting a noise reduction coefficient rating of 0.70 or greater in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials Test Method C423. Transportation/Traffic 1) Haven Avenue at 4th Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street to north Haven Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this improvement. 2) Milliken Avenue at 4th Street: Add a westbound right turn overlap from 4th Street to north Milliken Avenue. The project shall contribute on a fair -share basis to this improvement. Tribal Cultural Resources 1) Discovery of Human Remains: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. 2) Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources: In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all i F1—F6 Pg 51 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.17-104 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00406 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC DECEMBER 13, 2017 Page 7 work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: F1—F6 Pg352 Conditions of Approval R 'iN.AY°f1IONG.9 O G'UCCommunity Development Department Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for: 1) The subdivision of one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823) in conjunction with a related development located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 2) The construction of an industrial development (Design Review DRC2017-00402) consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 3) The formation of a Uniform Sign Program (Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404) related to a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 4) A Tree Removal Permit (Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405) request to remove eleven (11) heritage trees in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 5) A Minor Exception (Minor Exception DRC2017-00406) to reduce the required setback for average depth of landscape along Fourth Street and Utica Avenue by a maximum of ten (10%) percent in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. 6) A Minor Exception (Minor Exception DRC2017-00408) to increase the height of the screen wall along Trademark North Parkway by a maximum of 2 feet in conjunction with Design Review DRC2017-00402 for a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings located at the northwest comer of 4th Street and Utica Avenue on 13.96 acres of land; APN: 0210-081-43. wwvd.CityofRC.us Printed: 11/28=17 F1-1`6 Pg353 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of -sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on -site to match the building. 3. All ground -mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back -flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on -center. All ground -mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 4. The employee break area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the building, and tables, chairs/benches, and waste receptacles shall be provided. 5. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. Where tubular steel wrought iron sliding gates are used, they shall be backed by solid or perforated metal sheeting painted to match the fence or gate. 6. All outdoor lighting shall be recessed and/or constructed with full downward shielding in order to reduce light and glare impacts on trespass to adjoining properties and public rights -of -way. Each fixture shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights -of -way, so that no light fixture directly illuminates an area outside of the project site intended to be illuminated. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Approval of Tentative Parcel No. 19823 is granted subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 9. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval with Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. Printed: 11/28/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 18 F1—F6 Pg354 Project : SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 11. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 12. This tentative tract map or tentative parse€ map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 13. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 14. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 15. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 16. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 17. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 18. A detailed on -site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 19.Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted priorto occupancy. 20. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. Printed: 1112812017 Mvw.CityofRC.us - Page 3 of 18 F146 Pg355 Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 22. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 23. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 24. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 25. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 26. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 27. Perimeter and parking lot landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees within the public right-of-way. 28. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 29. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 30. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. Printed: 1112812017 ` W.CityofRcros F146 Pg356 Page 4 of 18 Project SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 32. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 33. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 34. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 35. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment and shall be architecturally compatible to the buildings onsite. The walls shall be comprised of the same material as the primary building material or shall be constructed of decorative masonry blocks with a decorative finish such , as stucco textured to match a concrete tilt up wall. 36. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 37. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 38. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 39. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 40. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 41. All vehicle driveways shall be decorative in design consistent with the approved plans. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed: 17/282017 mmw.CityofRC.us F1—F6 Pg357 Page 5 of 16 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni N 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Traffic Requirements: 1. 4th Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards as required and including: A. Protect or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, traffic signal equipment, and signing & striping as required. B. Provide a bus bay -right turn lane into the project site per City Standard Plan 119. C. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including minimum driveway approach widths, distance from intersections, and spacing from other driveways. D. Modify curb ramps to the latest ADA standards. 2. Utica Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Industrial Collector" standards as required and including: A. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. B. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including stacking distance, approach widths, and driveway distance from an intersection. 3. Bentley Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Collector with Median" standards as required and including: A. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. B. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including driveway approach width. 4. Trademark Parkway North frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Collector with Median" standards as required and including: D. Provide, protect, and/or repair curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and signing & striping as required. E. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including driveway approach width. F. Show sight lines for the driveway along Trademark Parkway. A , no -build easement may be required to provide adequate line of sight. Tree removals may be required along Trademark median 2. Provide a bus bay -right turn lane into the project site on 4th Street per City Standard Plan 119. 3. Reciprocal access easements from the lots to the west for the benefit of parcel 1 and parcel 3 shall be recorded prior to approval of the final map. 4. The City of Ontario will need to approve all direct connections to the 4th Street storm drain. All drainage studies that impact their downstream facilities will be routed to the City of Ontario for review. Coordinate with the City of Ontario to get a better understanding of their requirements. 5. The pavement on 4th Street is scheduled to be rehabilitated due to it's condition. Coordinate with the capital improvements department for timing of the improvements. 6. Development impact fees will be collected upon issuance of the building permit per the engineering fee schedule. Note that fees are subject to change annually. Printed: 11/26I2017 www.CityofRC,us Page 6 of 18 F1—F6 Pg358 Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 7. The existing ramps located at the southwest corner of Bentley and Utica and the northwest corner of Utica and Fourth shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If any ramp does not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramp for compliance. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit or approval of final subdivision map whichever occurs first. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 8. Update plan 1365 for the work on Utica, Bentley, and Trademark Parkway. Provide new plans for the work on Fourth Street 9. Per Resolution No. 87-96: All developments, except those contained in section 7 and others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development. The 66kV lines do not need to be undergrounded. The poles supporting the 66kV lines shall be moved to accommodate the location of proposed curbs, driveways, bus bays, etc. 10. The street lights shall be LS-2 type and owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. Street light design shall be supplemental to the public improvement plans. 11. Vacate a portion of Trademark Parkway south of Bentley. The existing public improvements shall be removed from that area. Coordinate with SCE for the removal of the existing street light. Provide evidence that all public utilities are removed or relocated prior to the vacation. No public access to the vacated area of Trademark Parkway shall be allowed. Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 13. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 14. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 41 total feet on Trademark Parkway North 41 total feet on Bentley Street 33 total feet on Utica Avenue 60 total feet on Fourth Street 15. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 16. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. Printed; 11128/2017 w1ww.CityofRC.us page 7 of 18 F1—F6 Pg359 Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 18. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 19. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 20. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 21. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first, for: Parcel 1 and the lot to the west Parcel 3 and the lot to the west 22. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 23. Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development on Fourth, Utica, Bentley, and Trademark Parkway. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, • along with three 1 114" innerducts in one of the 4" conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber -to -the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to final map approval. Printed: 11128/2017 Mvw.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 18 F1—F6 Pg360 Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni ///3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 25. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. Printed: 11/2812017 w v.CilyofRC.us Page 9 of 18 F1-1`6 Pg361 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location:-021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 26.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those _ areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 27.Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 28. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 29. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 30. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Printed: 11/28/2017 w m.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 18 F146 Pg362 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical development. for electric service and shall construct agreement and shall construct electrical and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho service provider for all project related 32. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 33. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 34. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 35. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as proposed. Additional FD Access doors are required on all the proposed buildings; FD Access doors spacing shall not exceed 100'. If the buildings are divided into suites, riser access to the building must be provided to all tenants served by the system from the exterior of the building without entering another suite; Maximum Travel distance is limited to 250' without smoke hatches. The Fire Standards and Guidance Documents are available on the City's web site www.cityofrc.us follow the path from the home page to city hall/fire district/prevention/fire code standards. Printed: 11128/2017 vavw.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 18 F1—F6 Pg363 Project##: SUSTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. wuvw.CilyotRC.us Printed: 11/28/2017 Page 12 oP18 F1—F6 Pg364 Project #: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code, 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Printed: 11/28=17 wm.CilyofRC.us Page 13 of 18 I'll—F6 Pg365 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017'00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Bu Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Utica Avenue and Fourth Street) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 21. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 22. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 23. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 24. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. Printed: 11/28/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 18 F1—F6 Pg366 Project;#: SUBTPM19823 DRC20,17-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 27. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 28. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 29. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 30. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 31. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 32. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 33. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 34. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 35. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. Printed: 11/28/2017 vmvw.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 18 F1—F6 Pg367 Project SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 39. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 11/28/2017 w N.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 18 F1—F6 Pg368 Project#: SUBTPM19823 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC2017-004D5, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular(78) repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific water quality management plan shall specifically addressed items: a., b., c., d., and I., above. Printed: W2812017 www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 18 F1—F6 Pg369 Projeci SUBTRN1,19323 DRC2017-00402, DRC2017-00404, DRC20'17-00405, DRC2017-00406, DRC2017-00408 Project Name: Panattoni /// 3 Industrial Buildings Location: - 021008120-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Design Review, Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 43. The permitted grading plan and the final project -specific water quality management plan are proposing stormwater detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. Printed: 11/28/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 1a of 16 F146 Pg370 DECEMBER PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AGENDA RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M." -CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca Vice Chairman Macias Commissioner Fletcher Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Wimberly B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. DISCUSSION ITEMS PLANNING COMMISSION C1. NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN DRC2015-00750 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A Planning Commission Workshop to review the proposed development areas of the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Project (NESAP). Related applications include: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00749, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00752, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00750, North Eastern Sphere Annexation DRC2015-00732, and related Environmental Impact Report D. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 3 DECEMBER PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AGENDA RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 7, 2017 seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. Page 2 of 3 DECEMBER PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AGENDA RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,725 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Page 3of3 REPORT DATE: December 13, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Plann�� INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN DRC2015- 00750 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — A Planning Commission Workshop to review the proposed development areas of the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Project (NESAP). Related applications include: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00749, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015- 00752, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00750, North Eastern Sphere Annexation DRC2015-00732, and related Environmental Impact Report. PROCESS: The purpose of this workshop is to provide the Planning Commission an overview of the proposed North Eastern Sphere Annexation Project (NESAP), specifically as it relates to proposed development areas within the overall project area. A discussion of the proposed conservation areas within the NESAP project area previously occurred at the October 25, 2017 Planning Commission Workshop. Following development of the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the NESAP will be scheduled for a public hearing at which time public testimony will be taken and consideration of the proposed project will occur. At this workshop, the only action taken will be to receive and file the report presented. As future public hearings are required, the Commission is requested to refrain from commentary for or against the project and ask for clarification of project elements as necessary. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed NESAP project area contains approximately 4,115 acres of land and extends from Haven Avenue, easterly to the City's boundary with Fontana, and from the northerly City limits to the National Forest boundary (Exhibit A). The entirety of the project will include a General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, North Eastern Sphere Annexation Specific Plan, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment, North Eastern Sphere Annexation, and all related environmental documentation. Currently, the majority of the project site is designated as Flood Control and Public Utilities Land by the City's General Plan and portions are pre -zoned by the Etiwanda North Specific Plan as Flood Control, Resource Conservation, and Hillside Residential. Initial design considerations propose maintaining the northerly 2,915-acres as a Conservation Priority Area (CPA), and establishing the lower 1,200 acres of Development Priority Area (DPA) in the southerly portion generally located between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Avenue, north of Banyan Street (Exhibit B). Early concepts for the DPA include a mix of residential product types, a central commercial "town center" with neighborhood retail and restaurants, and public uses and amenities arranged in a compact and walkable land use pattern to encourage active living. Cl—Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN DRC2015-00750 December 13, 2017 Page 2 Within the 2,915-acre CPA, conservation its a priority, however, the area contains existing development consisting of approximately 5 single-family residences and the Ling Yen Mountain Temple, Within the 1,200-acre DPA, development is a priority, however, initial considerations include approximately 490 acres of Open Space/Conservation, approximately 143 acres of existing Utility Easement, and approximately 579 acres of developable area. The CPA is being established with the overall goal of conserving and protecting existing foothill environments. The NESAP considers conserving a connected system of biologically viable habitat lands that reclaim natural processes and protect sensitive species. This includes the development of a preserve system that will enhance, protect, and maintain ecosystem functions and values, while maintaining scenic beauty, natural biological diversity, and providing compatible recreational opportunities that enhance the Vocal quality of life. Additionally, the NESAP will provide a consistent regulatory process that will allow for the efficient permitting of residential and commercial development in appropriate locations within the DPA. The general concept for the DPA includes single-family residential development along the perimeter of the project area and a commercial core at the center of the project area, including Mixed Use and multi -family residential development, surrounded by a large conservation area (Exhibit B). Proposed residential densities around the perimeter will match the density of existing adjacent residential development at Very Low (VL) and Low (L) residential development standards. The commercial core provides the opportunity for a village commercial center, mixed use development with live/work units, and multi -family development at a variety of residential densities. Circulation improvements will include connecting Wilson Avenue to existing portions of the street east and west of the project site, and other north -south and east -west street improvements to improve the interconnectivity of existing developments to the NESAP area. PROJECT STATUS: In January 2015, the City Council reaffirmed the goal of pre -zoning and annexation of a 4,115- acre portion of the City's Sphere -of -Influence. In May 2015, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Sargent Town Planning (STP) to prepare the NESAP. The area to be annexed is currently within the jurisdiction of the County of San Bernardino and consists mostly of undeveloped lands and open space. City staff, STP, and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) have had several meetings with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) to discuss the proposed project and elicit comments regarding potential environmental constraints. The project area was evaluated for the presence of the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR), which was not found within the project boundaries, and the presence and quality of Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS). STP continues to address biological resource assessments related to development of the NESAP and Draft EIR. In July 2017, the City Council approved an amendment to the scope of work and budget for STP to address additional environmental issues and engineering work related to the development of a project Tentative Tract Map. The NESAP Notice of Preparation (NOP) was circulated to public agencies with discretionary approval power over the project, i_e. "Responsible Agencies" and Native American Governments, and made available for review at the Archibald and Biane Libraries and on the City's website from C1—Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN DRC2015-00750 December 13, 2017 Page 2 September 11, 2017 to October 10, 2017. A revised NOP, which will include a more comprehensive project description, will be distributed in early December 2017 for an additional 30-day review period (which exceeds the minimum 30-day requirement). On September 27, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public scoping meeting on the NOP to elicit comments identifying issues that should be included in the EIR. The Commissioners agreed with the comprehensive list of environmental topics to be addressed in the EIR, and supported Staffs planned efforts for obtaining public input on the project. A series if NESAP Community Meetings were held at the dates and locations identified below. Notification for these Community Meetings were mailed to all property owners east of Haven Avenue, and north of the 210 Freeway, as well as property owners within the NESAP project area, property owners east of the NESAP project area in Fontana, and property owners west of the NESAP project area within the City's Sphere of Influence. • October 26, 2017, Los Osos High School Auditorium. • November 2, 2017, Day Creek Intermediate School Multi -Purpose Room. • November 9, 2017, Summit Intermediate School Multi -Purpose Room. • November 16, 2017, Los Osos High School Cafeteria. All Community Meetings were well attended, with the number of persons in attendance ranging from approximately 60 to 100 persons at each event. Those in attendance raised questions concerning the following subject areas: • Concerns with traffic, from both existing traffic conditions and the potential for impacts from future development. • Concerns with the proposed number and location of residential units. • Objections to proposed multi -family development (e.g., condos, apartments, attached and SFR). • Objections to the Conservation Priority Area. • Objections to proposed commercial development. • Loss of view. • Loss of open space. • Potential for increased taxes. • Desire to retain project area as it currently exists. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - NESAP Location Map Exhibit B - NESAP Development Priority Area CB:TGIjy Cl—Pg3 ry 414 to.*k r�.�'!+�F •��'' :fir;; L'�'K•••'J�fa •�. \ y f tp iMP. I r_It .�*{•. • .: yvi�sk,�r. 'ii# s� vi�yk•1� ?�•''r e ��•-�. 1;..?��4�.. �.s_,`��:Y:'"1.r•''Rli a� •ufrc,l�t�r=+�'+' �1; YrC':�,.1.' ;+fir YY' �, y i. '�..:�'•'�t%�c 'd'-ti:�'•��`�x'Ie3'r,`,(`.+•Ih w•4�F:�. �k�4 r�'•,�*`.�x7 ,C � . y. =•1". y�FF S ,.,.+.t,..t�-199 It• _1.YiRw'f'1 r.�:a� 1 `} '}='y —t �' , �'• '-�-,�I'�:'S+ �c 4i tyY�i��`�I :�+4 V. Z•�j �..�+ YY `}: � �:i Tr'�Cf .r ;•}Fly �� 1 jy �i h Pik l,.. _.:_a��r •`�'�"z'; �•tcl;h,�,»F-��.:Fi�s.Tit:S'_�,S.a[ `� !+. �� � *5-r_i=;$,�L-wlsa..lrt�a r�•w:�}ty� - y�;� no ' 1 •„ , y + Its i,.�; f . '•tip- / -� js A+ `{r' f� 7^no�w pall IMIA j1�, •:'9f r, ', f13'> RK �• M1 of '' •Tilt :rClr ru4�. `+t. '; L 4 fat t �.� •. r+�� _ 77��r�'lati's'. :r�•..+R�w....�w'2.f';.'rv,'��:'ia.rr�'.,�.i�,'Z"e.;�ksL� r �.. ` j1 . .. i.� '�•.r :A^ ts'.! �,. ?Ss,i:'� � au ` _Y '! ir!L r y',C~ ;- ., _ •? .il .i EF3_ LS+•+-I'i'.:'�� QT :� I � -ram. •w`1��.+•_F�q=• � :t �_�t •w,•. .� `. �, } ail a:_ :;�1F`. ors -,...:if 1� "r: "9 •. y r'.7.�.'-.. 4,-s 4 E ' *+� �_• TMl _'�,_f VaF 4,k'rt -' y:..M�} .w l� ,.. 5.' }�I*rt �'.t r . a a.ti West Development Area U Development Priority Area i Central Development Area - 234 acres West Development Area - 262 acres Southeast Development Area - 83 acres Utility Corridor +; ConservativnlRestvrationArea DUDEK Conservation Open Space cefltnal Development Area i r 1 , t t t 1 Conservation Open Space i r 1 L 1 , , r + , 1 1 I r Southeast `-,'Development Area FiGUR5 4 Development Priority Area NorM Eastern Sphere Anneva'.on Specific Plan (NES.ASP) EXHIBIT B C1—pg5