HomeMy WebLinkAbout16-30 - Resolutions - Site Paln ANd Architectural Review, Located on The Northwest Corner Of Kenyon Way And Lark Drive RESOLUTION NO. 16-30
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW
DRC2015-00975, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW OF 31 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON 6.5 ACRES OF LAND
IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN LOCATED ON
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF KENYON WAY AND LARK DRIVE;AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1089-011-04.
A. Recitals.
1. D.R. Horton filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2015-00975 as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review
request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 11th day of May 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on May 11, 2016, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to a property located on the northwest corner of Kenyon
Way and Lark Drive in the Low Medium (LM) Zoning District; and
b. The project site is approximately 650 feet from east to west and 400 feet from north
to south; and
c. To the north, south and east is single-family development within the Low Medium
(LM) Zoning District; to the west is a public park within the Park (P) Zoning District; and
d. The applicant proposes constructing 31 single-family residences on the 6.5 acre
project site; and
e. Three floor plans along with three unique elevations per floor plan are proposed.
The Development Code requires subdivisions with between 21 and 40 residences to provide 5
floorplans and three elevations per floor plan. The Code permits reverse footprints to count as an
additional floorplan. The homes range in size from 2,437 square feet to 2,967 square feet; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-30
DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00975
D.R. HORTON
May 11, 2016
Page 2
f. A Variance (DRC2016-00154) is included requesting setback reductions for Lot
#19 and #31; and
g. A Minor Exception (DRC2016-00256) is being requested to increase the property
line wall heights up to 8 feet adjacent to Kenyon Park; and
h. The project includes 3 lettered lots that will be maintained by the Landscape
Maintenance District in the area. Lot"A" is on the south side of Lark Drive and was created in order
to permit the intersection of the new project street and Lark Drive to line up. Lots"B" and "C"were
created in order to provide line-of-site visibility for the project's interior streets where they intersect
with Kenyon Way,which is curvilinear along the project boundary.The Engineering Department has
agreed to accept dedication and maintenance of the lettered lots.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1
and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The project is for the
design review of 31 single-family lots on a previously subdivided project site.The proposed use and
density are consistent with the General Plan.
b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the
purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project is for the Design Review of 31 single-
family residences on a previously subdivided project site. The use and density are consistent with
the Development Code and the Victoria Community Plan.
c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code. The project is for the Design Review of 31 single-family residences on a
previously subdivided project site. The project complies with all requirements of the Development
Code and the Victoria Community Plan except that a Variance(DRC2016-00154)for a reduction in
the setback requirement is being requested for Lot#19 and#31 and a Minor Exception (DRC2016-
00256) to allow increased wall heights due to a grade difference between the project site and the
adjacent City Park.
d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity. The environmental report written for the subdivision (SUBTT18508)of
the project site outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project
specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less-than-significant.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all
written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning
Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and
approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local
CEQA Guidelines,the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration in June,3,2015 in connection
with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 and Victoria Community Plan
Amendment DRC2014-00561. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-30
DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00975
D.R. HORTON
May 11, 2016
Page 3
supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary
approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that
indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii)substantial changes have occurred in
the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more
severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the project will have new or
more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now
feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce
impacts.
b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Design Review DRC2015-
00975,that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not
occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous
Mitigated Negative Declaration. The project is for the design review of the house product on the
previously approved 31 lot subdivision. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more
significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more
severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not
required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. The approved 31 lot
tentative tract map contemplated the ultimate development of 31 single-family residents and the
proposed Design Review is consistent with the approved map. The Variance and Minor Exception
will not create impacts that were not contemplated or will create impacts requiring additional
mitigation measures. The circumstances surrounding the project have not changed. The proposed
Design Review of the 31 residences on the project site is in keeping with the scope and intent of the
original environmental review.
c. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission
concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to
CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Design Review DRC2015-00975 and the
related entitlements.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference.
Planning Department
1) Approval is for the site plan and design review of 31 single-family
residences on the previously subdivided project site located northwest
corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive; APN: 1089-011-04.
2) Approval of Design Review DRC2015-00975 is contingent upon Planning
Commission approval of Variance DRC2016-00154 and Minor Exception
DRC2016-00256.
3) All conditions related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 shall apply.
4) All stucco shall have a 30/30 sand finish.
5) All decorative trim shall be wood or foam with a smooth or wood grained
troweled finish.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-30
DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00975
D.R. HORTON
May 11, 2016
Page 4
6) A minimum 25 percent of the residences shall be constructed with the
optional California room as shown on the approved plans.
7) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of
the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building
Code, or any other City Ordinances.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY 2016.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: rs�
Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman
ATTEST:
Ca yce rnett, Secretary
I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 11th day of May 2016, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
Conditions of Approval
iot
RANCHO Community Development Department
CUCAMONGA
Project#: DRC2015-00975 DRC2016-00154, DRC2016-00256
Project Name: RC 31
Location: --- 108901104-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to
relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees,
for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be
required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate
at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve
applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s)
are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not
required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
3. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced
within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
4. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates.
Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC.
5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all
other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in
effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
6. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards,
the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
7. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots
for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to,
public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of
construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing.
8. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include
Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code
regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:4/20/2016
Project#: DRC2015-00975 DRC2016-00154, DRC2016-00256
Project Name: RC 31
Location: --- 108901104-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1. "A" Street, Grimaldi Road and Lark Drive to be improved in accordance with City "Local Residential"
Standards and the Victoria Community Plan including but not limited to the following:
a. Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, knuckle, drive approaches, curb adjacent sidewalk,
ADA ramps, catch basins and storm drains, as required.
b. Provide a minimum concrete thickness of 6 inches for sidewalks at driveways per City Standard
No. 101.
c. Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights behind the sidewalk in a public utility
easement, as required.
d. Provide traffic striping and signage, as required.
2. Kenyon Way to be improved in accordance with City "Collector Street" standards and Victoria
Community Plan standards, including but not limited to the following:
a. Provide catch basin north of Lark Drive.
b. Provide "All Way"stop signs at the intersection of Lark Drive and Kenyon Way.
c. Revise existing street improvement and storm drain plans as required by the City Engineer
d. Protect or repair existing curb and gutter, sidewalk and streetlights.
e. Protect or provide traffic signing, R26(s) signs and striping, as required.
f. No residential driveways to Kenyon Way are permitted.
g. Parkway shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to the right-of-way.
h. Provide restrictions to keep the line of sight clear such as no-building easement.
3. Since all sidewalks are curb adjacent, no street trees will be required.
4. Lots A, B and C shall be maintained by the City. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans,
per Engineering Public Works Standards, shall be submitted to the Engineering Services
Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits. It
shall be consistent with existing adjacent LMD areas.
5. Sidewalk on the east edge of Kenyon Park, shown to be relocated 10 feet from the tract boundary to
accommodate the proposed perimeter wall, shall be coordinated with the City's Park Development
Section.
6. Existing private storm drain easement per Parcel Map 11105 shall be vacated.
7. Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to issuance of grading permits. Public
improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an
improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance.
8. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of
sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City
Engineer.
9. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 15-20 approving
Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT18508 shall apply.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:4/20/2016 Page 2 of 7
Project#: DRC2015-00975 DRC2016-00154, DRC2016-00256
Project Name: RC 31
Location: --- 108901104-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
10. This project is connected to or will disrupt existing City-maintained landscape and irrigation areas,
including a paseo along the south tract boundary and Kenyon Park along the west tract boundary.
Prior to new construction, a joint inspection and documentation of the existing areas' condition shall
occur with both the new contractor and the City inspector. The existing irrigation system shall be
relocated as needed and any damaged landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer. At this point, the new construction contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of
both the new and existing areas. The developer shall assume maintenance responsibility for the
altered landscape area for a minimum of 90 days after reconstruction. A follow-up inspection of
both areas is required prior to the City's acceptance of the new area.
11. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial
driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
12. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards.
13. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all
new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building
Permit issuance if no map is involved.
14. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or
issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the
developer.
15. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall
be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at
least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and
appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must
complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days
following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited.
Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit
reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit
amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site,
www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1. Submit for Plan check when Planning review is approved in accordance with the current editions of
the CA Building Codes
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:4/20/2016 Page 3 of 7
Project#: DRC2015-00975 DRC2016-00154, DRC2016-00256
Project Name: RC 31
Location: --- 108901104-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building
Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s)
shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans
shall implement design recommendations per said report.
3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted
at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review.
4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of
building permits.
5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects
and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more
of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet
signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer.
6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a
dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for
review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit.
8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be
prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm
water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by
the Engineer of Record.
9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements
prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property
owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be
constructed offset from the property line.
11. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property.
12. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted
California Plumbing Code.
13. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and
bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official.
15. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit".
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:4/20/2016 Page 4 of 7
Project#: DRC2015-00975 DRC2016-00154, DRC2016-00256
Project Name: RC 31
Location: --- 108901104-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
16. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor
shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project
owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading
requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours
from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the
Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building
and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading
inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii)
Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of
Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building
and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and
properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough
grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a
designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
17. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the
functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices
(BMP)devices.
18. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of
Approval.
19. The land owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project
specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a
biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
20. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to
the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Building Official.
21. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval
by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office.
22. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number(WDID).
23. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells)
with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to
issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management
Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan
set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management
Plan.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:4/20/2016 Page 5 of 7
Project#: DRC2015-00975 DRC2016-00154, DRC2016-00256
Project Name: RC 31
Location: --- 108901104-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
24. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis
for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program
Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s)
as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All
costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
25. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor
shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable.
26. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the
property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the
adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present).
27. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be
included within the engineered wall plans and calculations.
28. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters
and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent
29. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along
common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing
work on the adjacent property.
30. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration
chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner
shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan
prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are
the responsibility of the land owner.
31. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed
maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm
water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device
maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to
submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site
and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant
shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the
proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the
residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the
residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the
property shall be included within the WQMP document.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:4/20/2016 Page 6 of 7
Project#: DRC2015-00975 DRC2016-00154, DRC2016-00256
Project Name: RC 31
Location: --- 108901104-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At
a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert
filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance
Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality
management plan.
33. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan
shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet"
located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water
Quality Management Plans.
34. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have
a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm
water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the
current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans".
35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical
sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior
ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC
R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building
Code/Residential Code.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:4/20/2016 Page 7 of 7