Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout16-32 - Resolutions - To Increase The Maximuim Wall Height, Located On The Northwest Corner Of Kenyon Way And Lark Drive RESOLUTION NO. 16-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00256, A REQUEST TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT UP TO 8 FEET DUE TO A GRADE DIFFERENCE RELATED TO DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00975 FOR THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF 31 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON 6.5 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM(LM)RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(4- 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF KENYON WAY AND LARK DRIVE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1089-011-04. A. Recitals. 1. D.R. Horton filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2016-00256 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of May 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 11, 2016, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive in the Low Medium (LM) Zoning District; and b. The project site is approximately 650 feet from east to west and 400 feet from north to south; and c. To the north, south and east is single-family development within the Low Medium (LM) Zoning District; to the west is a public park within the Park (P) Zoning District; and d. The applicant proposes constructing 31 single-family residences on the 6.5 acre project site; and e. The project includes a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00256) request to increase the maximum permitted wall height from 6 feet to 8 feet related to an up to 4-foot grade change along PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-32 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00256 D.R. HORTON May 11, 2016 Page 2 the west property line, adjacent to Kenyon Park. Combination wall heights are calculated by adding %the height of the retaining portion of the subject wall to the free standing portion of the wall. The extra wall height will be most visible on the Kenyon Park side of the wall. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed increase in the height of the west property line wall is due to a grade difference between the project site and the adjacent City park (Kenyon Park) and is consistent with the residential nature of the Low Medium (LM) Development District in which the site is located. The additional wall height will provide privacy and security to the adjacent single- family residences. b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The increase in wall height for a portion of the west property line wall on the project site is compatible with the surrounding land uses in that the additional wall height will not negatively impact the residential nature of the subject lots and will be most visible on the park side of the wall. c. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. There is an up to 4-foot grade difference between the subject lot and the neighboring lot to the west. The additional wall height will allow the future home owners to screen and secure their private yard areas with a 6-foot high wall. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. It is common practice to approve Minor Exceptions for wall height when there is a grade difference between adjacent lots. In this case there is an up to 4-foot grade difference between the project site and the adjacent City park (Kenyon Park). 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines,the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration in June, 3,2015 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2014-00561. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-32 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00256 D.R. HORTON May 11, 2016 Page 3 feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Design Review DRC2015- 00975,that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The project is for the design review of the house product on the previously approved 31 lot subdivision. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. The approved 31 lot tentative tract map contemplated the ultimate development of 31 single-family residents and the proposed Design Review is consistent with the approved map. The Variance and Minor Exception will not create impacts that were not contemplated or will create impacts requiring additional mitigation measures. The circumstances surrounding the project have not changed. The proposed design review of the 31 residences on the project site is in keeping with the scope and intent of the original environmental review. c. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Design Review DRC2015-00975 and the related entitlements. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a Minor Exception to increase the permitted wall height up to 8 feet adjacent to Kenyon Park related to the design review of 31 single- family residences on the previously subdivided project site located northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive; APN: 1089-011-04. 2) Approval of Minor Exception DRC2016-00256 is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Design Review DRC2016-00975 and Variance DRC2016-00154. 3) All conditions related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 shall apply. 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-32 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00256 D.R. HORTON May 11, 2016 Page 4 BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce rnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of May 2016, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Conditions of Approval L. RANCHO Community Development Department C',,UCAMONGA Project#: DRC2015-00975 DRC2016-00154, DRC2016-00256 Project Name: RC 31 Location: --- 108901104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 4. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 6. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD) Standards. 7. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 8. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Project#: DRC2015-00975 DRC2016-00154, DRC2016-00256 Project Name: RC 31 Location: --- 108901104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. "A" Street, Grimaldi Road and Lark Drive to be improved in accordance with City "Local Residential" Standards and the Victoria Community Plan including but not limited to the following: a. Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, knuckle, drive approaches, curb adjacent sidewalk, ADA ramps, catch basins and storm drains, as required. b. Provide a minimum concrete thickness of 6 inches for sidewalks at driveways per City Standard No. 101. c. Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights behind the sidewalk in a public utility easement, as required. d. Provide traffic striping and signage, as required. 2. Kenyon Way to be improved in accordance with City "Collector Street" standards and Victoria Community Plan standards, including but not limited to the following: a. Provide catch basin north of Lark Drive. b. Provide "All Way" stop signs at the intersection of Lark Drive and Kenyon Way. c. Revise existing street improvement and storm drain plans as required by the City Engineer d. Protect or repair existing curb and gutter, sidewalk and streetlights. e. Protect or provide traffic signing, R26(s) signs and striping, as required. f. No residential driveways to Kenyon Way are permitted. g. Parkway shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to the right-of-way. h. Provide restrictions to keep the line of sight clear such as no-building easement. 3. Since all sidewalks are curb adjacent, no street trees will be required. 4. Lots A, B and C shall be maintained by the City. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans, per Engineering Public Works Standards, shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits. It shall be consistent with existing adjacent LMD areas. 5. Sidewalk on the east edge of Kenyon Park, shown to be relocated 10 feet from the tract boundary to accommodate the proposed perimeter wall, shall be coordinated with the City's Park Development Section. 6. Existing private storm drain easement per Parcel Map 11105 shall be vacated. 7. Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance. 8. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. 9. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 15-20 approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT18508 shall apply. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Page 2 of 7 Project#: DRC2015-00975 DRC2016-00154, DRC2016-00256 Project Name: RC 31 Location: --- 108901104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. This project is connected to or will disrupt existing City-maintained landscape and irrigation areas, including a paseo along the south tract boundary and Kenyon Park along the west tract boundary. Prior to new construction, a joint inspection and documentation of the existing areas' condition shall occur with both the new contractor and the City inspector. The existing irrigation system shall be relocated as needed and any damaged landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. At this point, the new construction contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of both the new and existing areas. The developer shall assume maintenance responsibility for the altered landscape area for a minimum of 90 days after reconstruction. A follow-up inspection of both areas is required prior to the City's acceptance of the new area. 11. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 12. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 13. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 14. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 15. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Submit for Plan check when Planning review is approved in accordance with the current editions of the CA Building Codes Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Page 3 of 7 Project#: DRC2015-00975 DRC2016-00154, DRC2016-00256 Project Name: RC 31 Location: --- 108901104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 12. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 13. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Page 4 of 7 Project#: DRC2015-00975 DRC2016-00154, DRC2016-00256 Project Name: RC 31 Location: --- 108901104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 17. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 18. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 19. The land owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 20. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 21. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 22. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 23. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Page 5 of 7 Project#: DRC2015-00975 DRC2016-00154, DRC2016-00256 Project Name: RC 31 Location: --- 108901104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 24. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 25. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 26. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 27. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 28. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 29. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 30. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 31. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Page 6 of 7 Project#: DRC2015-00975 DRC2016-00154, DRC2016-00256 Project Name: RC 31 Location: --- 108901104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. 34. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Page 7 of 7