Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-05-11 - Agenda Packet Part 3 of 3 PC-HPCSTAFF REP®RT AM, PLANMNGDEPARTMENT Date: May 11, 2016 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Candyce Burnett By: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014- 01132 - FOOTHILL & EAST, LLC — A proposed amendment to Development Code Table 17.36.020-2 (Development Standards for Mixed Use Zoning Districts) to clarify permitted uses in the Mixed Use Zoning Districts and allowing Transit Orientated Developments (TOD) within '/2 mile of a transit stop and to amend Section 17.36.020 A and B, Figure 17.36.020-1 and Table 17.36.020-1, to add the proposed site to the Development Standards for Mixed Use Zoning Districts Tables, Figures and Text for consistency with the proposed Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-01131 amending the zoning designation of the site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU)) for the development of a proposed 193-unit, multi- family residential development with the potential for 3,246 square feet of commercial space to support future mass transit opportunities for a site located on 8.8 acres of land within the Community Commercial (CC) Zoning District at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; APN's: 1100-201-03, 04 and 07. Related Files: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-01131, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945, Development Review DRC2014-01130, Minor Exception DRC2016-00169, Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-01134 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2015-00318 were continued from the April 27, meeting date. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-01131- FOOTHILL & EAST, LLC - A request to change the zoning designation for 8.8 acres of land from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU) related to the development of a 193- unit, multi -family residential development with the potential for 3,246 square feet of commercial space to support future mass transit opportunities on a project site within the Community Commercial (CC) Zoning District at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; APN's: 1100-201-03, 04 and 07. Related Files: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945, Development Review DRC2014-01130, Minor Exception DRC2016-00169, Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-01134 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2015-00318. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19945 - FOOTHILL & EAST, LLC - A request to subdivide 8.8 acres of land for residential and commercial condominium purposes related to the development of a 193-unit, multi -family mixed use development with the potential for 3,246 square feet of commercial space to support future mass transit opportunities on a project site of within the Community Commercial (CC) Zoninq District at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East E—K1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01131, DRC2016-00169, SUBTT19945, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01134 & DRC2015-00318 FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 2 Avenue; APN's: 1100-201-03, 04 and 07. Related Files: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-01131, Development Review DRC2014-01130, Minor Exception DRC2016-00169, Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-01134 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2015-00318. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01130 - FOOTHILL & EAST, LLC - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 193-unit, multi -family residential development with the potential for 3,246 square feet of commercial space to support future mass transit opportunities on a site located on 8.8 acres of land within the Community Commercial (CC) Zoning District at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; APN's: 1100-201-03, 04 and 07. Related Files: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-01131, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945, Minor Exception DRC2016-00169, Tree Removal Permit DRC2014- 01134 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2015-00318. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00169 - FOOTHILL & EAST, LLC - A request to reduce the required parking by up to 38 spaces related to the development of a 193-unit, multi -family residential development with the potential for 3,246 square feet of commercial space to support future mass transit opportunities on a project site of 8.8 acres of land within the Community Commercial (CC) Zoning District at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; APN's: 1100-201-03, 04 and 07. Related Files: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014- 01131, Development Review DRC2014-01130, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945, Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-01134 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2015-00318. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-01134 - FOOTHILL & EAST, LLC - A request to remove approximately 184 trees related to the development of a 193-unit, multi -family residential development with the potential for 3,246 square feet of commercial space to support future mass transit opportunities on a project site of 8.8 acres of land within the Community Commercial (CC) Zoning District at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; APN's: 1100-201-03, 04 and 07. Related Files: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014- 01131, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945, Development Review DRC2014-01130, Minor Exception DRC2016-00169 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2015-00318. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2015-00318 - FOOTHILL & EAST, LLC - A request to review the Uniform Sign Program related to the development of a 193-unit multi -family residential development with the potential for 3,246 square feet of commercial space to support future mass transit opportunities on a project E—K2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01131, DRC2016-00169, DRC2015-00318 FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 3 SUBTT19945, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01134 & site within the Community Commercial (CC) Zoning District at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; APN's: 1100-201-03, 04 and 07. Related Files: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014- 01131, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945, Development Review DRC2014-01130, Minor Exception DRC2016-00169 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-01134. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: Adopt the Resolutions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945, Development Review DRC2014-01130, Minor Exception DRC2016-00169, Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-01134 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2015-00318, approving these applications with Conditions of Approval; and Adopt the Resolutions recommending that the City Council approve Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-01131 and recommend the adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: 21.9 dwelling units per acre. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant Land — Community Commercial (CC) South - Multi -Family Work Force Housing — Medium Residential (M) East - Flood Control Facility/Single-Family Residential (Low Medium) — City of Fontana West - Utility Easements — Open Space (OS) General Plan Designations: Project Site - Mixed Use North - Mixed Use South - Medium Residential East - City of Fontana (Low Medium Residential) West - Flood Control/Utility Corridor C. Proiect Site Background: The applicant originally submitted a request to construct a 61,800 square foot commercial development on the project site on November 3, 2009. That project was approved by the Planning Commission on March 23, 2011 and was scheduled for review by the City Council on May 18, 2011. The project was appealed by an adjacent property owner over environmental concerns and an issue related to a .7 acre sliver of land that the project needed to cross to provide access from East Avenue. The City Council remanded the project back to the Planning Commission for further review at the May 18, 2011 City Council meeting. The City received a letter from the appellant dated February 14, 2013, stating that they had resolved all objections to the E—K3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01131, DRC2016-00169, SUBTT19945, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01134 & DRC2015-00318 FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 4 project with the applicant's agreement to purchase the .7 acre parcel of land in question, which is included in the proposed development. During the interim period (May 18, 2011 to February 14, 2013 (while litigation was taking place)), the applicant was unable to lease the anchor tenant spaces in the proposed commercial development and made the decision to not seek final City Council approval of that development. At that time, the applicant entered into discussion with the City with respect to developing the project site for residential purposes with a potential retail component to serve a future Omnitrans BRT. D. Site Characteristics: The project site is three (3) parcels of land totaling 8.8 gross acres located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. The site is vacant with the exception of a water pumping station operated by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) near the northwest corner of the project site and a grove of Eucalyptus trees that were planted prior to 1938 and were historically used as a wood lot. The site is bordered by vacant land to the north, a utility corridor to the west, single-family residences to the east (City of Fontana) and multi -family residences to the south. ANALYSIS A. Project Overview: The applicant is requesting Design Review (Design Review DRC2014-01130) of a 193 unit multi -family residential development on 8.8 acres of land and includes a 3,246 square foot area that may either be developed as the first floor commercial space of live/work units (2 story units) or as 100 percent commercial tenant space. The project site currently has a zoning designation of Community Commercial (CC) and a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (GC). The Planning Commission is scheduled to review a General Plan land use change for the project site from General Commercial (GC) to Mixed Use (MU) at the May 11, 2016 meeting and includes changing a number of unrelated parcels to Mixed Use (MU). The project was designed to conform to the new Mixed -Use (MU) standards which were approved by the City Council on October 21, 2015. The following related entitlements are included as part of the project: Development Code Amendment (DRC2014-01132) will: a) clarify permitted uses in the Mixed Use Zoning Districts by amending Development Code Table 17.36.020-2 (Development Standards for Mixed Use Zoning Districts) by adding 2 separate footnotes clarifying the permitted uses within the Mixed Use District and b) modify the facts, figures and tables in Development Code Section 17.36.020, to add the project site as Mixed Use area #14, to the current 13 Mixed Use areas and modify Figures 17.38.060-1 and 17.38.060-15, to change the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed Use (Subarea 4 Map). 2. A Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-01131) changing the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU), in conformance with the new General Plan land use designation. 3. A one lot Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT19945) for commercial and residential condominium purposes. 4. A Minor Exception (DRC2016-00169) to reduce the required number of parking spaces. 5. A Tree Removal Permit (DRC201-01134) for the removal of 184 on -site eucalyptus trees. 6. A Uniform Sign Program (DRC2015-00318). E—K4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01131, DRC2016-00169, SUBTT19945, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01134 & DRC2015-00318 FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 5 B. Compatibility with the Mixed Use Requirements: The project was submitted for review on December 22, 2014, prior to the approval of the new Mixed Use standards by the City Council on October 21, 2015. The new Mixed Use standards require that Mixed Use developments incorporate two land uses (residential, office, commercial and/or live work). The proposed project was originally conceived as a high density Transit Oriented Development (TOD) project with the potential to provide a small commercial component at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue, to serve the users of a future bus rapid express route through the City. The original goal was for the retail portion of the project to be implemented when the new bus service went into operation. The proposed 3,246 square feet of retail space is located on the ground floor of Building V, at the Foothill Boulevard/East Avenue intersection. To comply with the new mixed use requirement, and to provide flexibility in leasing the commercial space, the applicant has provided two separate floorplans for developing the 3,246 square feet of commercial space in Building V. The space will either be developed as live/work units with the first floor devoted to the commercial use and a one bedroom apartment located on the second story, with an internal stairway connecting the work area to the residential use or the second option is for 100 percent commercial space, with no connection to the residential units above. C. Project Design: The project will be gated with one vehicle entrance on each Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue (with an additional Emergency Vehicle/CVWD Access gate on Foothill Boulevard). The fitness center will provide the main focal point at the end of the Foothill Boulevard vehicle entrance and will also serve as the leasing office. Multiple pedestrian access gates are provided along both Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. The residential units facing Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue will not be gated and will have their unit entrances and private open space areas directly facing the adjacent public streets. The project is made up of two, three and four story buildings. The ground level units and the two story units are accessed by private entrances at the street level. The upper floor units are accessed by common hallways, stairways and elevators. The buildings have a contemporary Spanish architectural design theme and provide wall and roof plane articulation on all elevations including decorative tower elements, with each grouping of buildings providing a common open space area. The future retail tenant spaces are located at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue and include a common open space area with tables and chairs. Vehicle parking is provided in garages (101 spaces), carports (92 spaces) and open stalls (191 spaces). The project includes a generous number of both bicycle lockers (126 spaces) and bike bollards (48 spaces). The project site is located adjacent to a Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) water pumping station. There is a CVWD easement across the project site to provide vehicle access for maintenance purposes. CVWD contacted the City related to their access easement and potential noise issues related to the operation of the water pumps. The applicant is working with CVWD to provide adequate vehicle access to the pumping station and to incorporate noise attenuation construction methods that will reduce the noise levels of the pumps. A Condition of Approval has been added requiring that that the project comply with the related noise limitations and to work with CVWD to provide adequate access to their facility. D. Residential Unit Breakdown: The development consists of 193 units, including 72 one bedroom units (769 - 774 square feet), 107 two bedroom units (1,068 — 1,322 square feet) and 14 three bedroom units (1,352 square feet). The 3,256 square feet of potential commercial space will be either be used as three live/work units or as 100 percent commercial space. E—K5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01131, DRC2016-00169, SUBTT19945, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01134 & DRC2015-00318 FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 6 E. Recreational Amenities: The Development Code requires that projects with between 101 and 200 units provide 5 recreational amenities from an approved list. The project exceeds this requirement and is designed with recreational amenities that meet the interests of residents of all age groups. The proposed amenities include: A clubhouse/meeting room. 2. Indoor fitness center. An outdoor entertainment area adjacent to the clubhouse that includes a pool, spa, multiple covered and uncovered gathering areas and an outdoor kitchen area. 4. A dog park. 5. Tot lot. 6. An open turf play area. 7. Multiple courtyards with common seating areas. F. Development Code Amendment: Development Code Amendment (DRC2014-01132) will amend Development Code Table 17.36.020-2, which outlines the development standards for Mixed Use zoning districts. Currently, the Mixed Use standards include a requirement that mixed use projects incorporate a minimum of two land uses. The proposed Amendment adds two separate footnotes to the Land Use Mix requirement as follows: On project sites of five acres (net) or less, two or more housing types/product, such as detached and attached SFR; SFR and MFR; combinations of SFR, townhome, condominiums, and apartments; etc., shall satisfy the requirement for providing a combination of two or more uses (Footnote 8). This change will promote the development of smaller parcels within Mixed Use (MU) zoning areas where a non-residential use may not be practical due to the parcel size. 2. Subject to Planning Commission Review and Approval, Transit Oriented Developments within '/2 mile of a transit stop are exempt from meeting the minimum two land use requirement (Footnote 9). This change will encourage the development of higher density projects adjacent to transit stops, implementing General Plan Policy LU-2.1 - to develop high density residential areas at strategic infill locations along transit routes. The goal being to increase transit accessibility and ridership and to reduce vehicle trips. Although this project will not require the two amendments as the project exceeds 5 acres in size and provides two uses, these two amendments will help clarify text that was not clear in the 2015 code changes. E—K6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01131, DRC2016-00169, DRC2015-00318 FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 7 SUBTT19945, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01134 & G. Project Specific Development Code Amendment: The Development Code Amendment also amends Development Code Section 17.36.020 A and B, Figure 17.36.020-1 and Table 17.36.020- 1, to add the project site to the Development Standards for Mixed Use Zoning Districts and Figure 17.38.060-1 and 17.38.060-15, to change the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed Use, related to the proposed Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-01131), amending the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). H. Zoning Map Amendment: Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-01131) proposes changing the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). The Planning Commission is scheduled to review a related General Plan land use change for the project site from General Commercial (GC) to Mixed Use (MU), at the May 11, 2016 meeting, which includes changing a number of unrelated parcels also to Mixed Use (MU). The proposed Zoning Map Amendment will bring the project site into conformance with the General Plan. Tentative Tract Map: Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT19945) is for the subdivision of the 8.8 acre project site in order to create a one lot tentative tract map for residential and commercial condominium purposes. J. Parking: Parking required for a mixed use project that includes 3,246 square feet of retail (190 Units + 3,246 square feet of retail) is 422 parking spaces, including 204 covered spaces, 141 open spaces, 62 guest spaces and 13 retail spaces. The project provides a total of 384 parking spaces, 38 parking spaces under the minimum requirement (a 9 percent deficiency). The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00169) to reduce the required parking by 38 parking spaces. The project is also 11 covered parking spaces deficient of meeting the required 204 covered parking space requirement. A Condition of Approval has been included requiring that the project provide the minimum required number of covered parking spaces. The Mixed Use development standards stipulate that parking for mixed use projects is based on the Development Code requirement for the individual uses within the development verified through a parking study, which reviews the adequacy of the number of proposed parking spaces. The parking study is also required to be peer reviewed by a third party consultant contracted by the City. If it is determined that a reduced number of parking spaces is adequate for all of the uses within a mixed use project, an application for a Minor Exception or Variance is necessary to reduce the required number of parking spaces. The applicant has submitted a parking study (LSA; August 18, 2015) which finds that the proposed number of parking spaces is adequate to meet the parking demand for the proposed mix of uses within the project. The parking study evaluated the parking demand of similar mixed use projects in other cities in Southern California and finds that the proposed project exceeds the parking ratios provided by similar projects reviewed in the study. The parking study outlines project specific design elements provided by the project that reduce the total parking demand. The project includes a mix of residential and commercial uses, which have different peak parking demand times. The 13 parking spaces dedicated to the retail use, which has peak parking demand in the afternoon and early evenings, may be used by the residential units in the later evening hours. The project is located adjacent to a transit stop, which has been found to reduce parking demand by 2 percent (or approximately 8 parking spaces for the proposed project). The project provides 174 secure bicycle storage spaces. Bicycle storage spaces have been found to reduce parking demand by 1 vehicle parking space for each 3 bicycle storage spaces. The parking study concludes that through the use of the above design elements combined with the implementation residential lease agreements and parking passes limiting the number of permitted on -site vehicles (including restrictions on personal storage inside the garage areas), the project will E—K7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01131, DRC2016-00169, SUBTT19945, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01134 & DRC2015-00318 FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 8 provide adequate parking to meet the project parking demand. It should be noted that 58 of the parking spaces are located on Southern California Gas Company and Southern California Edison easements that run along the western boundary of the project. These easement holders have conceptually approved parking within their easement areas. The easement holders, however, will not permit the planting of trees within the easement areas and there is always the risk that the parking spaces may be temporarily displaced during maintenance of the underlying utilities. A Condition of Approval states that the total number of residential units is dependent on the applicant securing the right to provide the total number of parking spaces shown on the site plan. If agreements cannot be reached with the easement holders, the total number of residential units shall be reduced by a commensurate ratio to the number of parking spaces lost. Peer Review of Parking Study: Urban Crossroads (January 21, 2016) conducted a peer review on the parking study submitted for the project (LSA; August 18, 2015). They concluded that the 13 parking spaces devoted to the 3,246 square foot retail tenants will be needed by the retail tenants into the evening hours. This is when residential parking demand is peaking, leaving little or no opportunity for shared parking to be available for the residential uses if the retail tenant spaces are occupied by businesses with significant evening traffic. Urban Crossroads also raised a concern that any parking shortfall will potentially negatively impact single-family residential streets to the north and east of the project site. Urban Crossroads recommended that the retail uses be reviewed to verify that they will not negatively impact the available on -site parking in the evening hours. It should be noted that while 13 spaces are dedicated to meet the minimum parking requirement for the retail uses, there are 27 parking spaces available for both the retail and residential uses adjacent to the retail tenant spaces. Conditions of approval have been included requiring that a Parking Management Plan be submitted prior to final occupancy and that the potential retail uses be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The Parking Management Plan shall at minimum include requirements that a parking pass program be implemented and that the use of the garages and carports be strictly monitored. The Planning Director may periodically review and require additional parking mitigation measures if it is determined that the on -site parking is inadequate to meet the project's parking demand. The applicant has been in discussion with staff with respect to permitting vehicle parking along the west side of East Avenue, which could potentially provide up to 62 additional parking spaces adjacent to the project site. This change would greatly enhance the available parking available to the project and help to ameliorate potential parking issues related to the parking shortfall on the project site. Staff is supportive of permitting on -street parking adjacent to the project site, as it will support the increased density necessary to make mixed use and transit oriented developments successful. The table below outlines the total required number of parking spaces by unit type, number of guest parking spaces and the number of covered parking spaces with an enclosed garage and a carport. The table highlights that there is a paring shortfall of 38 parking spaces and a covered parking shortfall of 11 parking spaces. E—K8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01131, DRC2016-00169, DRC2015-00318 FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 9 SUBTT19945, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01134 & Number of Bedrooms *Numberof Units Code Standard' R(i0dirdirlCcivered Parking Total Required Parking Sp�ces Total -Provided Parking One Bedroom Units 69 1.5 Spaces/Unit 69 spaces 104 spaces Spaces 1 Covered Space) Two Bedroom Units 107 2.0 Spaces/Unit 107 spaces 214 spaces (1 Covered S ace) Three Bedroom Units 2.0 Spaces/Unit 26 spaces 28 spaces 7 14 (2 Covered Spaces) Retail Parking 1 space for each 250 square 13 spaces 3,246 feet of leasable area Guest Parking 190 1 per 3 units 62 Spaces Enclosed Garage Spaces 101 Carport Spaces 92 Total Covered Spaces (Garage and Carport) 204 193 Total Parking Spaces 422 384 ggyered_pai kiiig Shortfall Pa�kirig'Shgr[fall (-36) Pot@ipal,,On:Street ParHiiigSpaces 62 In conclusion, with implementation of the mitigation measures outlined in the parking study, there should be adequate on -site parking provided on the project site. With the additional parking provided along East Avenue, the project should have a more than adequate parking available for tenant use. Staff supports the related Minor Exception (DRC2016-00169) to reduce on -site parking by 38 parking spaces and to permit on -street parking along the west side of East Avenue. K. Minor Exception: A Minor Exception (DRC2016-00169) has been submitted to reduce the total required parking by up to 38 parking spaces (9% deficiency). Minor Exceptions permit an up to 25 percent reduction in the required on -site parking. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Fact: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. Finding: The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is consistent with the General Plan, which has stated policies to support development projects that require infill development to be designed for pedestrians and automobiles equally, and to provide connections to transit and bicycle facilities. (General Plan Policy LU2.2). The project is located adjacent to a transit stop, provides 174 secure bicycle parking spaces and provides convenient access to pedestrians and automobiles. 2. Fact: The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Finding: The proposed high density residential/mixed use project is located on a major thoroughfare that is in near proximity to similar multi -family projects and nearby commercial uses. E—K9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01131, DRC2016-00169, DRC2015-00318 FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 10 SUBTT19945, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01134 & 3. Fact: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Finding: The proposed reduction in the parking standards is necessary to allow increased residential density on the project site, which is located adjacent to a transit stop. The General Plan has a stated policy (Policy LU-4.1) to provide new mixed use development opportunities along the Foothill Boulevard corridor to allow residential, commercial and civic uses, and to accommodate both transit and automobiles. The proposed project is located adjacent to a transit stop and provides the opportunity for a potential mixed use development. Additionally the applicant will provide up to 62 additional on -street parking spaces that will offset the 38 parking space deficiency. 4. Fact: Thegranting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. Finding: The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to reduce the required number of parking spaces where it has been demonstrated that the project will provide adequate parking for all of the proposed onsite uses. The applicant has submitted a parking study (LSA; August 18, 2015) verifying the adequacy of the proposed number of on -site parking spaces. L. Tree Removal Permit: Tree Removal Permit (DRC2014-01134) is being requested for the removal of 184 eucalyptus trees. It has been determined that all 184 on -site eucalyptus trees are in poor condition due to pest infestation, lack of care and maintenance and other observed structural deficiencies (Kisinger Environmental Consulting - December 17, 2014). To offset the loss of the eucalyptus trees, the arborist report recommends planting 52 eucalyptus trees and 36 date palms in a configuration recommended by the landscape architect. The landscape plan submitted for the project includes the planting of a total of 267 new trees on the project site, including the 88 trees recommended for replacement by the arborist report. M. Uniform Sign Program: Uniform Sign Program (DRC2015-00318) was submitted for the project providing text and illustrations for the proposed project monumentation (La Mirage on Route 66), for the overall project signage and for the wall signs for the potential commercial units. A monument sign is proposed at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue honoring "Historic Route 66" and includes the City's name and logo. All signs conform to the Code for both size and quantity. N. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held on October 13, 2015. All the property owners within 660 feet of the site were invited to the meeting. Three property owners attended the meeting with general questions about project design, time line for construction and whether the units would be market rate or affordable housing. The applicant addressed each of the resident's questions. The applicant provided an overview of the project and informed the residents that the units would be market rate apartments and that they hoped to start construction within a year of final approval. O. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on October 20, 2015. The Committee recommended approval and forwarded project to Planning E—K10 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01131, DRC2016-00169, SUBTT19945, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01134 & DRC2015-00318 FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 12 While offsite habitat may be suitable for SBKR or LAPM or other California Species of Concern (SC), trapping evidence on adjacent parcels show that potentially suitable habitat adjacent to the project site is isolated from occupied SBKR to the north and that adjacent suitable habitat, now lost to development, was not occupied in 2006 or 2012. Since SBKR was not present on adjacent sites, it would not have sought refuge by crossing the Foothill Boulevard barrier. Furthermore no LAPM or SBKR have been trapped within the adjacent SCE alignment south of Base Line Road or north of 8th Street according to Steve Montgomery, who trapped the adjacent alignment for the Falcon Ridge project. Debra Kisinger concludes that some additional mitigation measures, such as exclusion fencing and pre -construction monitoring of the fence line may be required to prevent potentially occurring Species of Special Concern in adjacent suitable habitat from accessing the project site. The response concludes that there is no potential for LAPM or SBKR to occur on site or significant populations of Species of Concern; there is no substantial new information or significant impacts that would require recirculation of the IS/MND. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, air quality, greenhouse gas, Native American tribal cultural resources and geology and soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5(c) states that recirculation of the Initial Study is not required when new mitigation measures are replaced with equal or more effective measures. As recommended by the project biologist, Debra Kisinger, a new mitigation measure was added to the Condition of approval related to the installation of a habitat exclusion fence around the project site. Staff concludes that with the additional documentation provided in the response letter from the project biologist to CDFW comments, and the implementation of the additional mitigation measure recommended in the response letter, that the issues raised by CDFW have been addressed and there is no evidence that the project will have a significant impact on the environment. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, Candyc Burnett Planning Director E—K11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01131, DRC2016-00169, SUBTT19945, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01134 & DRC2015-00318 FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 13 CB:TV/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Plan, Floor Plan and Architectural Plans Exhibit B - Grading Plans Exhibit C - Landscape Plans Exhibit D - Development Code Mixed Use Text and Exhibit Changes Exhibit E - Development Code Foothill Boulevards District Exhibit Changes Exhibit F - Zoning Amendment Map Exhibits Exhibit G - Design Review Action Comments dated October 20, 2015 Exhibit H - CDFW Letter dated April 20, 2016 Exhibit I - Biologist Response Letter dated May 4, 2016 Exhibit J - Initial Study Parts I, II and III Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Code DRC2014-01132 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-01131 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2014-01130 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2016-00169 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-01134 Draft Resolution of Approval for Uniform Sign Program DRC2015-00318 E—K12 m A Xm LA MIRAGE ONR_O_U_TE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DESIGN REVIEW RESUBMITTAL SET PRO✓EOT TEAM — APPLICANT/DEVELOPER: ARCHITECT' wrm EAST, IIC ARCHITES ORANGE MME.'SSrR£ET. _ _ - ORANGE. E. C(MANCfSMFET LOSANGELES CA 9M1 CA 91586 ATM K4NMNBENN IEL:()111&3A9B60 — ATM SERARN MARANANdIOANNAAWGWTI A. w •am LANDSCAPE. MAOIXEd ASSOCIATES, INC 99@RTTBBURGNAVENUE. apc CONCEPTWLLOFSKil9AN0 BANNING CO __La SUITE 190 91B5C, A/RFORTLWP, STUOIOONE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA RIM COSTA MESA, CA RMS saw )TIN )WARKBERT TEL: (SL91599i1as0 - Aam ATIN�MARKBERTONE A1TN'M14ITTKONl ENBERGLR -A.v - as — +TM�e _� �" nww Hretw AAclnec*ure9:�sar- --- ---- — --- .A»x:saeww.n^aa"e ra nna yfti mnr.: a..v A«awAasFrevA�oe naoxeuxnxnTe �::aacwNs mw:. __ com ~ Pa. r :w: cam vwu:aneq w.xevm a awAm:+n+Aa ma.wvluA:+rwwrn xnw.revm wrtian., ate.-•" eLILNf.Rw+slMfe _ _ r cmTsrzmna.r:aArtnAs- _ —__ aeueawuvwne 'flwff Tas iNaiW.. _ _—'-- xaw ms vw 1.mn Mraa e_ __ wt�i.«vcwox.awa saw.e.c..-mwwrtlw:.nrev vwrv« -i4ma] wn nAwu:nmr::::uw u � . wnn:w : u�•uc n:. r.: — c !ww-uc�ux: _ :>xu::�: za. - Aga I LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC 9116E i55TREET, LOSANGELES. GA JOO?I oamaexseTrma nwm anwAm VER SHEET ARCHITECTS ORANGE 144 .NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE. GA"FORNIA 92,68 17141639.9880 �• 13 P 1-58PAPHNG LA MIRAGE ONR0UTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DESIGNREVIEW RESUBMITTAL SET BUILDING/UNIT MIX TOTAL BUILDING SO. FT. el.oG, ' 11 '1BORY sauRM t seoRu rorN. T'dum L5T TPE ry E:GT', , --� .,:- . PRIVATE OPEN SPACE i1m1rTPE a` r so Fr'. y `Basr4 Sag. i 45 �n AI LWlC£ 3 85 1]0 1% 17a aa' 80 s,crvvn 14 t 123 1a% im - k' "Awg:S'1 84 V/unit 11 099 ] R ))J BICYCLE PARKING SUMMARY LA M/RAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC AHSE. 16STRFE . LOSANGE3ES, CAS0021 MERFAINEO NA.RCR O B4Yf1F. SVTCFS 613 wexM )N fI .. fi,td9 6.1A1 4.14 &LfALXG roi.5I5 2f.'J55 65,789 05..n L5.7W 2ti6.Af 6t1 LEASABLE UNIT SQ. FT. ummTPE I UNRLSF I ON % roTAd' DATA SHEET = �� ARCHITECTS ORANGE ONR4 mo p_ W NORTH ORANGE Sr.. ORANGE. CAUPORN1A 92866 (714)63M860 - smill — W-11AT'Rals SLOG. p BLDG'15 LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC MIS E. ISSTREET, LOSANGELE$ CA 90021 PROJECTSUMMARY . pV .. Z - .'}uTiilk-61i•CCv^ fl vu�rs v r ovnxvya..wg�; -<� was zs... TOTAL BUILDING SO. F .. >r _ I PARKINGSUTAMARY TOTAL REQUIRED Lwrs n m na SF-bw uliin,� _ _ ,.,00rP.w _en. avenY v m mruxmumarna�.+•- - — . FAWM.a ceansi«wrm vmexewv+ W u — PARKINGSUMMARY TOTAL PROVIDED NORM GN a — LEASABLE UNIT SO. FT. 0 4~0'88�0'112�0' 1"= 40'-0" AWM 41Yp4910 SITE PLAN - _C- ARCHITECTS ORANGE oRre� W NORTH ORANGE Sr.. ORANGE. CALIFORNIA 92866 piq 639.9860 �•- m I A )A B2 B2 TF X, 17 STORAGE Hill I Jill p1j.:,; L S A2 A2 -A -A A2 B1 B1 r !�j F - --.-; L B"2 B2 Al RP STORAGE cd RAGE, I f Al STORAGE U75 Au iji, u ILI B 1 B 1 Ljj cl = 61 BI v2Ta ci 3,, GROUND LEVEL TYPICAL UPPER LEVEL (2ND, 3RD AND 4TH) SCALE32 - LA A111RA GE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA BUILDING PLANS - TYPE I -a FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC ARCHITECTS ORANGE MIGF- ISSMEET. LOSANGELEa CA 90021 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92866 (114) 639.9860 l A2 ! B1 ABV. CLUBHOUSE B1 ABV. A2 . OPEN SPACE BZ a� fi Al -�° ,,- - j ry STORAGE C� B1 �' L B1 !' A2 m L -.�."� �1 STORAGE II �ti T G T B1 GROUND LEVEL TYPICAL UPPER LEVEL (2ND, 3RD AND 4TH) . 3 SCALE 33 - 1'-0" LA M/RAGE ONROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA BUILDING PLANS - TYPE 1-b=� FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC 2018E. 15STREET. LOSANGEbFG CA 90021 ARCHITECTS ORANGE 144 NORM ORANGE St.. ORANGE. GALIFORNU 928CS p14)639.9860 - GROUND LEVEL TYPICAL UPPER LEVEL (2ND AND 3RD) LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC 2016E ISSTREET, LOSANGELES. CA "21 0 S.GMrt— n. w o 11 W _ P21EW (� SCALE,3Z"= 1`-0" muaa_ arew,aenmrs BUILDING PLANS -TYPE ll -�` - ARCHITECTS ORANGE 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. ORANGE CALIFORNIA 92966 P141639-986D 0 GROUND LEVEL ' uswn p p a,Am i TYPICAL UPPER LEVEL (2ND AND 3R0) 'a46°"` ^5FO1" (//')Y' .+s,wruuaw LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC 2016 E. 155IREE1: LOS ANGELES CA 90021 mu.ro, szfrwun umn SCALE 32 BUILDING PLANS - TYPE III ARCHITECTS ORANGE 144 NORTH ORANGE SL, ORANGE CALIFORNIA 92866 1714)639.9860 OPEN GROUND LEVEL LA M/RAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC OISE. 155TREET, LOSANGELES, CA9WTI �ewrvna Ti£mrsA ssrwvrewwuc n+rx �aruwnuamFoorwumw wnrn :�:t''. a�'& scirmemrl+ww SCALE 3g"= 1'-0" BUILDING PLANS - TYPE IV mruor wramis ARCHITECTS ORANGE em III NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE. CALIFORNIA 92868 OL/ 60A9660 1 W � MT1 1111 a' �-" I "Wif ►Bil4W= lid=lam : = �"�:!:��'1l-��i�1���3.1�- �g�:'���R�i'• 0 5 Al SECOND LEVEL :;::,.,..sFrrn�rA.arw ,einm�ansENrsA iaarvwNa"mnmr ruvlsuowwonma.w re. ie SCALE-,32"= 1'-0" �— LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA BUILDING PLANS - TYPE IV FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC M16E f6STREET, LOGANGELf$ GA9? ARCHITECTS ORANGE OdM mY P Ifs NORTH ORANGE ST.,ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 9286C 17f,)689.9860 — m I N �i 1 A � � r i L'II�IiIL'III. e �'- ^ a k waa ' ®. ® ,nwNN.aTi^_1S'l�a�r� M waa aFd •wf■I__• • � • +` s.- •w —. ye � wY .w. I��' re • w�,� '�'' a ; . _ wa r .�` avv _ e ^ ' a •oo Ju �a,�' •ev �� @ 6Ulia 'ryI�� d171>9`>9r ° isll 1�� kills _; � 1►^ ' 'G _ I ■ �Y` I111� 011lI1! ■ \ IMF. � Eel ilk 6s HMOY • i THIRD LEVEL LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC M16E. 15STREE ,, LOSANGELES, CA90021 I�,�e Tsroarew.w ma u.�uasuawrmneuew '� ssFrvuar•+o� A14101 wr pu SCALEgp'= 1'-0" BUILDING PLANS - TYPE IV ARCHITECTS ORANGE I" NORTH ORANGEST., ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92888 /7141E39-9660 GROUND LEVEL LA MIRA GE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC WISE, 15 SMEE ..WSANGELES. GA9G011 2ND LEVEL zraFvu. zszamauunzw SCALE Gz"= 1'-0" BUILDING PLANS - TYPE V ARCHITECTS ORANGE t4l NGRIH GRANGE Sr.. GRANGE. CALWORNIA 92866 O14)6)9-9660 =c' �■■■■■■■ •oi lo°I �n I�� � ��"V�t. �!. mirorsimirvirlmis ■■■■■■■■■■ 14 > X X', LA M/R4 GE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC M16E. 1SSIREET.LOSANGE ACA 9L109I BLDG. #2 TYPE 1-ari U ��amc.rrtr¢ssmrrex� A-209 av�uuse SCALE �"= 1'-0" LEASING/FITNESS CENTER AND CLUBHOUSE -_ - ARCHITECTS ORANGE 144 NORM ORANGE Sr.. ORANGE CALIFORNIA 92866 (7I4)699.9660 m 00 SONTR ELEVATION WESTELEVATION EAST ELEVATION LA M/RAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC 1016E ISSTREET,LOSANOELES fA 21 'Jf I .I � � 1 rr � y Y� E! i-- NORTNELEVATION A-301 SCALE 39ri1'-0" COLOR ELEVATIONSN- BUILDING TYPE I -A ARCHITECTS ORANGE Ul NORTH ORANGE SL, ONAN". CALIEORNIA 9)666 ill-) 639.966G SOOTHE AnON W TaL AnON LA M/RAGE ONROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC 1016E. I6GTREET LOGANGQES G49001I NOR EL AnON EASTELEVAnON SCALEM2NI'4' COLOR ELEUATIO BUILDING TYPE H A-302 X..,yl=.�,•ann ARCHITECTS ORANGE 144 NORTH ORANGESL,ORANGE. CALITORNIA 9I6661714) 699.9660 - - m w 0 SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELE'ATION EASTELEVAnW LA M/RAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC X 76E. 15STREET. LOSANG£LES, CA 90021 ,. y� RT NORTH ELEVATION 4pw_ T'}7 I it LL—_ A-303 SCAtE]nV.V-O^ oieisiwm,e COLOR ELEVATIONS_ BUILDINGTYPEIII ARCHITECTS ORANGE /i1 NORTH GRANGE Sr, ORANGE. CALIFORNU 92866 pul 699.9660 r ■i m n-11 a ■I Ir 1 III all. I 9_II jai lit! A ■ f. Ild W1110NIP", IN fll i ei Ir SONTNELEVAnON LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC M16E. 165TREET, LOSANGELES CA90021 tlo Ao tle otl RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA NORnIELEVAnON EASTELEMON A-305 SCAL W211'4• rnw COLOR ELEVATIONS — BUILDINGS TYPE V ARCHITECTS ORANGE 1U NORM ORANGE Sr., ORANGE, CAUFORNlA 92866 (II4)68?9860 NORTNEL AnON EASTELEVATION LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC 2016E 15STREET. LOSANGELES. CA 0021 A-306 SCALEMV.1'4" r eer,ewnn.mre LEASING AND - FITNESS BUILDING ARCHITECTS ORANGE 144 NORtH GRANGE ST. GRANGE. CALIFORNIA 92866 PII/659.9660 m W A BOM/M MEMAI M LA MIRA GE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC 2016E 15STREET. LOSANGELES CA 90021 COLOR I MATERIAL LEOEun Q MAmm" 1. 9lUCDD-2N305AND 2 METAL RAILING WI MESH INSERTS-PNNTORADE S VMDMH 4MOWBERS CJTTO DESTE NERLRE COLORS PLf-'MGM' 5 NNY(WINOOW-WHfTE COLORS PUNN EDWARDS, A. S11/CCO PRECIOOSPEARLS(OEW066J R MCCO- CAUCO NOON (DE Wnj G S w- WBD MUSTAML IDEA 161) D SMCCO- ALESfN ELUE(DEG 996) E RALING I TRELLISES I GNOP:ES-CNMCOA( S DGE(D WM A-307 =1 ARCHITECTS ORANGE 741 NORTH GRANGE Sr. ORANGE, CAU£ORNIA 9266E (7W 6)94660 I - I 1 � h:•a-ti 't A r= +Pi 64S9 71 AA I 6 04 rq .. 1 ,. .ter, -t � ; a •C, read • - -- _3 �n �f' ' � _ � .0 • i ::f'i �--�, �, a as -- • �1I� i; iy III I� .e.i u� � � � 1 %, AVI ell,OFT _ 4 Bp _ lUivlNlAWfo�G'w-R. MM'MlCp1Y: bN.I1. 0 Imall MEMO a w u - w Mnrcw01 W Ivsavi. o,ru U. ���^�I���GI 99�1 IG9�..� ilboil:!I ' 0 mom ,in���lE LA M/RAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC TOf6E. 15STREET, LOSANGE[£S. G 900Y1 t.4AYIFRGi�itr63"R. M�tl.WRNIGR. m. UNRCI:]Mf]M vuaaxu vv.a v"mauwxxmsnR am, UNROIL26RIZ Mmwroo. M. on SCALE 118"= 1'-0" UNIT PLANS ARCHITECTS ORANGE oG„� fU NOR TR ORANGE ST.. ORANGE. CALIFORNIA 92866 (711)699-9960 m w V UNITAI:IBR,§A UNIIALNE-WOPK:I9RI LNABLENIVFLf ]9YSO.Ff. -LIT BLEOAE\IEVEI'1. 49]G6fi. sa so. R. eucox.: wsa. R. SIdYLEmKF.111 q1. R. LN99lEANFT TOtN: lA395O. R. OM.b SIMKESP].¢:CI (Y. R. OT`E Le]nUNRBI: YBRIIBA UNRBIIIVE_WCFI(: 2BRI24M veav a�vmsoi]. � 'Wuviiwnuuz vws.wii- u �mF'I; S]51iG WI4E �tOTYffiR ffiR. n Al UNIT BI LM*ORR:]BFI2 ESA —.nv6v'u�Ev¢c a«sui]. � 'LN.V4ENi 61pL1.Vffi'iYA 56 R. / LA M/RAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC "16E. 155TREET. LCGMGELES, CA900T1 A-407--X SCALE 118"= 1'-0" x�jorwIRV" UNIT PLANS = ii ARCHITECTS ORANGE 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. ORANGE. CALIFORNIA 92066 (TIQ 639.9860 m w 00 lot FOUR BIN PLAN TWO BIN PLAN mkKK SMSNIC snnrrcc FRONTELEVATION REAR ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION LAMIRAGEONROUTE66 RANCHO cucAmoNGA,cA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC XwE lssm, LosANcsas. CA 900Pf MT- Pxv KIA 22.:: A-501 PARKING AND TRASH ENCLOSURE - A ARCHITECTS ORANGE f4l NORTH ORANGE ST.. ORANGE, CALIFORNM 99666 f7k) 63?9860 A-501 PARKING AND TRASH ENCLOSURE - A ARCHITECTS ORANGE f4l NORTH ORANGE ST.. ORANGE, CALIFORNM 99666 f7k) 63?9860 m x _T W m I w ID !fie / EiIWANM°COLONY - ,' P � / l(W X NOTES Wry MAP x IRK e' ' sac t:l r UTILITIES COMPANIES •.n r� �.. w' a �rr:�'' w.mn 1(.S_ x swrrc� u cas [au arr _ I iwurXP. iCppf [f 111x toWeXf � rua(NRW _ _ y ' �rRIlMNE [uVIeX> e II �W'Ilwl Wei» wer[=f.YlmLdr OWNER/DEVELOPER. roan x[ [ CIVILENGINEER YG. rv'W�ft iY. t»W !3KG"°". rmRm wTmxvnsal. DRC NUMBER 201A- rrr.mlrr.` SUBTT 19945 �y' 'AN @ ""' G tom.. • ', �•.`ti`Yfs =• -„ SITE UTILIZATION PLAN FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19945 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. � � '/ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, •1t •r - F� q - ` x e qFG<!IBER )pif�•p)ef eCRF5 XR655 X11N9EflE[IIUi >5IpCflES NEi III FitigFOl Oi e —��Yo• SU-01 RQ,6M:fv LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA WMACIOLE-- d_ , FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC ARCHITECTS ORANGE o 1076E ISSIRE£T LO$A LES,""2r WNORTH ORANGE Sr., ORANGE, OALIFORNIA 92866/11q 639-9660 ELI LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC 2016C 15SIRCET,LOSANGCLES W900I1 ML ROM urr unT1®mlrA>$ n1v / ase nn:lsc leo wra. G5: �• [t[PMMm GM n sw Wtv4leVAvx( muwr,ll.TTx G0.r' Qr4 dOOFURi M. Po441Y P1fY �RN�. A .nn u4w :Yx,uv nnx. vuwv eEw f V% Iltt-IDIN.OI AI Y . m.. o n, W010S: a w BBC NUMBER 2014— SUBTT 19945 1� �pp TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM. PURPOSES TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19945 _ IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. OE¢tmFgA,1 i?9IlAF5 fRp9 yV9El✓EOLOT Tv,1[Ms,ET YIELIFRS.. T-01 H(MADOLE ARCHITECTS ORANGE _ W NORTH ORANGE Sr. ORANGE. LALIFORNIA 9NbR (714)M-9960 m I A @MOtlYE Uh�.I W301-01, 01. Ol L�pe:Edtq IWRgR N`Eq / RV6q[E alruvn, wuuu.s in�WWu a UfIfIEH C04PMS m / mn ERcnnc: rmn vm: vut(v nv¢v mnv ,w [Wrun 4ruryur Irr.n� �m 1rra.ur RIEPdL 4� rdk. vJ}i ORC NUMBER 2014— 0113D SUDiI 199A5 NOTE: SEE ARCH SITE PLAN FOR SITE DIMENSIONS AND SETBACKS CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19945 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO, STATE OF CAUFORNIA. OECFIIPER,f011 ].99PLPESGPp51 xnncusxEl wlwlr 4,. ' =11-11ra WMADOLEm LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA mmum woloe: FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC ARCHITECTS ORANGE 101BC ISSSRCET,LOS ANGCLES. W' AW$l 144 NORTH ORANGE SF. ORANGE: f.A(IFORNIA 91A66 (114)6]8-9660 ERED WT OLE]1EPEp 401 CG-01 �— i m I 7z A N SECTION A -A SECTION S-S SECTION D-D .11 1-1 SECTION E-E Nr SECTION G-G SECTION H-H Y4E ,-s WLL --a SECTION J-J SECTION K-K SECTION L-L SECTION M=M z .a SECTION N-N rna r.Y (C."DOLE SECTION C-C sVLL -a SECTION F-F SECTION 1-1 wmn/: DRC NUMBER 2014-011}0 SUBTT 19945 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19945 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERRNARDINO. STATE 0' CAUFORNIA. DEc.mlou ],BSK5E9Gv649 IMIAR[ TS l01 ).51MTES NET OLETTER.DLOT CO-02 FOOTHILL BL VD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA dam` FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC ARCHITECTS ORANGE .I.E 15SIRE[[GOSAxGETGSCA? l 144 NORTH ORANGE St. ORANGE CAUFORNIA 9286A p14)559.9866 I=.n rt In E ^ 1 w M EA_S[AMEKR SF,C1 [mT1L40.w. SECTION WDINB: SIR NUAIBER 2 SUBTT 01A—Ot13O 199A5 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19945 IN THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. v.—vR-11 vclui-1- CE[ElNE0.All ]9SOLRFSG10159 IMIAR 1D.1 ]sruRes Ne] nlrn ...T CG-03 KMADOUE LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA _ FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC ARCHITECTS ORANGE XIIO C. 15 SMBCC!]OSANCCLC$. �I 144 NORIN ORANGE Sr. ORANGE CAIIII NA $?III IIIIJ G]94860 I I IL �._._ _I _ �I1 I ' � nt o i ..FH Lr MD!%w WOID#: DRC NUMBER 2014— SUSTT 19945 ------- n FO0 - -`- - FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19945 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUN" OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CAI-IFORNIA. u..vrp o rit v yuc u.� ar. y GlfEL2k0.M1. ].95 /IILLSGP059 AN.9EIYDlO] ]S1PL9ESNE] o1E11FAEOLOi FH-01 WMADOLE LA M/RAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC ARCHITECTS ORANGE 1010E 155]RCC/.LOSAMMES,CARGV21 Nd NORTHORANGESI, ORANGE CALIFORNIA 9216617?4IEM-gFA6 — I MA-B • i 0.552, AC. 0.883 AC. /.539 C.F. 2,462 C.F. MA-B 1.103 AC: 3,074 C.F.. MA -A 0.782 AC.� • -1 f MA —A 2.370 AC. 6,606 C.F. 1 49C F 9. A—' _ -0.360 AC.. I .I 1,004 C.F. 00 . , r• i i 0.867 �nosr. P�vEuvrt FOOh1ZL SOIAEV _— —___—_—__ Ie30tCElE POAIY Fqi YNV IHLNICE MU ISPECIpN --.11 >.11nu f dM OP91 QR CIIGl�1 y'um MM8 TCB1(fiCA1E ®JCI nw-'�P �I yN w _,:r-r •nNu�nr:w r:[ua u•.v.o.0 u. •va:u...:e:w un u-w-:n:. E RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA «<OLE m LAM/RAGE ONRDUT 66 ��. FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC ARCHITECTS ORANGE .'.E, ISSIREEi.LOSANSEl£$fA.NJ11 IJONORMDRNLEST,O NLE. CAUFORN 918 (11JIM.d60 W m I A m PERFORATED UNDERGROUND RETENTION SYSTEM TYPICAL DETAILS U g 7f3 m�..�.m LA M rrrM,DOLE/RAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC ARCHITECTS ORANGE MEE 15STREEr. LOSANGELES. GR=1 I41 NORIN ORANGE St, ORANGE. LAIIFORNIA R;E66 (71A, 631.9M WOMP 02 m I A V CATCH BASIN INSERT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDE 0 /DK VORTSEMAY INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDE FF :t _ L.�v�n CeYrtcN INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE BADE FOR PERFORATED CORRUGATED STEEL. PIPE UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM CCF` e>:li' (NMADOLE LA M/RAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC ARCHITECTS ORANGE A16E 1657RCC/.LOS PNGFLCS C4.9Rp3I 7J NORTH ORANGE SI., ORANGE, GLIFORNU 121Lfi ()IIJ 6J99660 WOMP 03 REESPDN$BLE PARTI' FOR MAINTENANCE Am P15PECTDN FOOTHILL & EAST, LLC 2016 E 15TH SIRCET LOS ANGELFS, CA. 90021 PHONE: (213) 749-1447 v-109 ATTN: KAMRAN BENJI CATCH BASIN INSERT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE GLIDE LNspE ONa nuNr NANCE SCH4DULEE E I!U w 49L] IRMSERT. MLYIIU l ) IP CD WNW A.'N.DAC NNE' xvs Dxl o W n wicN oypUx3€�€nylc¢ pgac_ ougEa VORTSENTRY INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDE LN ELE�4L9N %MCw.NQEN4NCE 5CNECULE3 Y rtRPEITOM WNIEALY OxRRMEM1mI ` uxt A,NA,ADD ADDIMONAL E NEO ORCSAFTER xoE� 911MriigYµ xECOMMEXDED— WPE INSPECTION AND WKOM CE GUOE FOR PEPFORATED COMLIGATED STEEL PIPE UNDERGROUND MENTON SYSR]J INSPECTION 4.NAINTE' ANCE� NF�OULES IPNaE�,�N_lq"x aMgP ox PN�ooxFnNPOEop - . MMExD VPOc[DCIUPFc paocaowey�C�9N} ry'�M scgvic5 WQMP 04 M(MADOLE LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMoNGA, CANA -® FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC ARCHITECTS ORANGE .INTO[15SMR 1. LMANGRCS. G.1 "1 NORM ORANGE S/.ONANLE. WfIFOR. 9]A66.... 4]S.55Ec m x 2 03 I [/ I PROPOSED SITE AMENITIES. O Rc,w n %CONOMY NOE ENEMY - a" e1vO, n m ym E[ E y- roomsaw .V[p mmr U ace uarsEn� AREA n ore+su�ven AMFA © ror LOT n♦ oo e M Crl RE.T Q]IYiTI.MS Cpl FINFI@Cr VfIGE KQSS wonaE elw - aESE TAL Aco:ss tw+ami ` ® mNATG a6soENa Acass 'f @ nA-Acnru orovEix'uvw F ail R LI KEY NOTES A ., uu TR. ® afro 61wuc - a sranr ArARraENrs �- .. msEREO rAvsr.c ] srMY Ar4RAEMs FFNO'./6ECIMRY ace � I■�\� �c arcuAriON �� �_� rowavnr waurwn . . Gaeepi T. Po g rrvc CIRCULA TION PLAN LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC ARCHITECTS ORANGE 744 NORTH ORANGE Sr. ORANGE. MIPORNIA 9S666 p•AI 639-M80 - -- -- -� m i Ln CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC Y0161" 15 SMER LOSg fFS. G 9WJl 3r wr+r � [atlr YYYpf •w•.+ur rn r y.r r•rr ++�wr rwecr raw. _ ARCHITECTS ORANGE 144 NONIh QANC[ Sr CRAVOF CALIPOPNIA 91666 pv. 639.9890 l wrronems f� S ■ 5sz49s l • IntE"tlr�ii� Ed O•�LQLQ v� KEY NQT.0: ## mnw w%a m ur.e+r uvrtrz.vu _ a .ram m vus re mw.wr wwrt.n�r reY• I w.e _ I r 1 1 � we w�u ro mrw+ww�rux eLD& I -�. _ I •V• wwn vx �rAWMWaM ro wrw RAEIB [TY VYl w'" rc vrrr w wow l -Y _ imuryl-xoull_u I rcoTj� BLv:p ft •S�` ...\r: .f4r.i r� per I I _ _ roai neuAn SNEL ire AND WE W/ nQ.AM__— _AIliMI ENIIff WALL a •`{_-GIEWAI YR4@!f._-. • I WA -fm a:�. �.. _..�....• QF9pF11ML iAilp WALL ti"' QAYIIIML CONOE'1E lFAIFIll � fIIIlr I J� i r.. CVKRM � �� �• ^ DEy1L QE4$isul Ll94AR sits; W, M/ CAN --I- O WAQw AF IIALGR SI&1 FBI[F --, _ .. YB4E RIIRY 4dK aw w/ Mwm M91 WALL WALL AND FENCE PLAN LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC 1016E Iw SlAEEC LDV gMCkI£S.GStlMI area w rsias+ ARCHITECTS ORANGE .: :U+i'N OPAhGE S:. ORdNGE. G:(RJHNIJ n2&Bfi pro w3B9B6J WW z` �7LU_0 all .� �. JW ITT -12 aw m Ln Ln to COURTYARD CONCEPT BLDG 4 SMALL FLOVC Ru PAnO ACCENT TFZE COURTYARD CONCEPT BLDG 5-A r COURTYARD ENLARGEMENTS - BLDG 4 & 5 LA M/RAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC M6F l3SfRFFT10SANf.EIESCA.9lW2r COURTYARD CONCEPT BLDG 5-5 Key Map Legend ARCHITECTS ORANGE 744NORNORANCFST, ORANGE CAUFORNA 9:866 plU 6)y9)66 t SCALE lAB'•i-0' m I tA C1 VV VEFMCA P N * bW�Ft 01W* 9EATYULL PLAWM M/ VERTICAL ELEMENT COURTYARD EAILARCEMEAITS 12,3 LA MIRAGE ON ROUTE 66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2916E L5SIREEl.LOsmGELES.CAfV"21 v4.9ORr9VRANGESL. ORANGE. CAVIORNIA VM 1714I639.9661 e �' r "Existing Text" Section 17.36.020 A of the Development A. Purpose and Applicability. The purpose of this Section is to establish minimum development standards that are unique to development projects within the City's Mixed Use Zoning District. The General Plan establishes thirteen (13) mixed use sites throughout the city with the intent to create special urban places with horizontal and/or vertical integration of uses. In the General Plan, each mixed use site includes intent statements, land use ranges, and corresponding development assumptions. Development standards in this Section apply to all land designated on the Zoning Map within a Mixed Use District and are intended to be consistent with and implement the General Plan. See Figure 17.36.020-1 (Mixed Use Sites). EXHIBIT E—K58 "Proposed Text" Section 17.36.020 A of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follow with changes highlighted: A. Purpose and Applicability. The purpose of this Section is to establish minimum development standards that are unique to development projects within the City's �.. _ . _. Mixed Use Zoning District. The General Plan establishes fourteen (14) mized;use sites throughout the city with the intent to create special urban places with horizontal and/or vertical integration of uses. In the General Plan, each mixed use site includes intent statements, land use ranges, and corresponding development assumptions. Development standards in this Section apply to all land designated on the Zoning Map within a Mixed Use District and are intended to be consistent with and implement the General Plan. See Figure 17.36.020-1 (Mixed Use Sites). E—K59 "ExistingTable" Table 17.36.020-2 of the Development Code E—K60 Table 17.36.020-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS = Development Standard `. r MU 4 Site/Lot Area (minimum) ('> n/a Lot Width/Depth (minimum) n/a Allowed Density (dwelling units'peracre) ; Minimum Density n/a Maximum Density 50 units/acre Land Use Mix Project shall incorporate a minimum of two of the following types of land uses: Commercial, Office, Institutional, Residential, LiveNVork Setbacks (3)(4) Street Yard (Major/Special Boulevard) 50% - 75% reduction of streetscape requirements (7) Street Yard (Secondary/Collector) 50% - 75% reduction of streetscape requirements (7) Street Yard (Local Streets) 75% - 100% reduction of streetscape requirements (7) Rear Yard (adjacent to residential) Match rear yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Rear Yard (adjacent to commercial or industrial) 0 feet (5) Interior Side (adjacent to residential) Match side yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Interior Side (adjacent to commercial or industrial) 5 feet Distance Between Building' Primary Buildings Minimum per Building Code requirements Accessory Buildings .. Buildmg Height (maximum in feet) Primary Buildings 75 feet maximum Accessory Buildings Not to exceed primary building height Floor Area Ratio maximum ratio of buildin to lot s uare foofa e Floor Area Ratio 1.0 max Open Space Requirement (minimum percentage of open space per parcel be project) Landscape Area (overall net area) 10% minimum Open Space Requirements Minimum of 150 square feetlunit See Section 17.36.020 (D) for additional requirements Recreation Area/Facility Required per Section 17.36.010 (E) Parking Requirement. - Parking Spaces See Table 17.64.050-1 NOTE: A parking study is required for all Mixed Use projects per Section 17.64.060(D) E—K61 Table Notes., (1) On existing lots of record, parcels less than three (3) acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Lot sizes less than one-half (Y) acre are not subject to land use mix requirement. (3) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (4) Shall apply to buildings, parking and landscaping. (5) Must meet minimum Building Codes. (6) All buildings within one -hundred (100) feet of LM, L, or VL Districts shall not exceed twenty five feet (25); however, there may be areas where the maximum building height may be required to be less than the cited maximum, and shag be determined on a case by case basis. (7) For mixed use development of any type see the streetscape setbacks in Table 17.36.010-3 that apply to Attached Single - Family Residential and Multi -Family Residential. E-K62 "Proposed Table" Table 17.36.020-2 of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows with changes highlighted: E—K63 Table 17.36.020-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard r MU .t, b .., Site/Lot Area (minimum) (1) n/a Lot Width/Depth (minimum) n/a Allowed Density, (dwelling, units per acre). " Minimum Density n/a Maximum Density 50 unitslacre Land Use Mix t21(eft?; Project shall incorporate a minimum of two of the following types of land uses: Commercial, Office, Institutional, Residential, Live/Work Setbacks Street Yard (Major/Special Boulevard) 50% - 75% reduction of streetscape requirements (7) Street Yard (Secondary/Collector) 50% - 75% reduction of streetscape requirements (7) Street Yard (Local Streets) 75% - 100% reduction of streetscape requirements (7) Rear Yard (adjacent to residential) Match rear yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Rear Yard (adjacent to commercial or industrial) 0 feet (5) Interior Side (adjacent to residential) Match side yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Interior Side (adjacent to commercial or industrial) 5 feet Distance Between Buildings_.; " = Primary Buildings Minimum per Building Code requirements Accessory Buildings Building.Height (maximum in feet) N) Primary Buildings 75 feet maximum Accessory Buildings Not to exceed primary building height Floor Area.Ratio (niaxi'mum ratio of building to lot square footage)_ .." Floor Area Ratio 1.0 max Open Space; Requirement (minimum percentage of open space per parcel orproject) Landscape Area (overall net area) 10% minimum Open Space Requirements Minimum of 150 square feettunit See Section 17.36.020 (D) for additional requirements Recreation Area/Facility Required per Section 17.36.010 (E) Parking Requirement. Parking Spaces See Table 17.64.050-1 NOTE: A parking study is required for all Mixed Use projects per Section 17.64.060(D) E—K64 Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record, parcels less than three (3) acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Lot sizes less than one-half (/:) acre are not subject to land use mix requirement. (3) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (4) Shall apply to buildings, parking and landscaping. (5) Must meet minimum Building Codes. (6) All buildings within one -hundred (100) feet of LM, L, or VL Districts shall not exceed twenty five feet (25); however, there may be areas where the maximum building height may be required to be less than the cited maximum, and shall be determined on a case by case basis. (7) For mixed use development of any type see the streetscape setbacks in Table 17.36.010-3 that apply to Attached Single- E-K65 "Existing Figure" Figure 17.36.020-1 of the Development Code FIGURE 17.36.020-1 MIXED USE SITES E—K66 ar+,m �w wm p ° aas a ON _ ti.a aed�..aap[�l eew�autaei+Wseta�l,.awwv��l 'G k � _. . Ua)xamo—vo _'_17- w — ¢awl a noou,oat�fiwr n 1 - ;OD- irvmgww vow +wr �a+�savaivan+nmCl i i II � . .x _ r u v.�cucro.•sroo-.tca.0 • .L.._.,.. �,, I' I pW0owl . - i "Proposed Figure" Figure 17.36.020-1 of the Development Code is hereby deleted and replaced as follows: FIGURE 17.36.020-1 MIXED USE SITES l:m 1 M 0) w A N F11 'tC NC NC NC M NC Nc PORv1 ian visls Vlsn�uE commump O �a Legend --- City limas S�ptieiTc)ific Plans - Heavy Industrial (HI) Overlay l Etiwanda North Specific Plan t�'.LI ❑ . Hillsde Residential (HR) Commercial Mlsed Use Overlay Etiwanda Specific Plan Industrial Park (IP) . Equas rum Overlay Empire Lakes Speorc Plan Low Residential (L) ..: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Zoning Low -Medium Residential (LM) Haven Avenue Overlay - General Commercial (GC) Medium Residential (M) - - - Hillside Overlay Per Ord. 626 Community Commercial (CC) ® Madium-High Resdential (MH) M Senior Housing Overlay Neghtiomood Commercial (NC) {j Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (MIHI) Community Plans - Regional Related Commercial (RRC) Mlsed Use (MU) Caryn Planned Community Specially Commercial (SC) - Open Specs (OS) �-� Etiwanda Hlginands Planned Community - Comm ndutiOlfice (CO) Planned Community (PC) Tema Vista Planned Community, - Off" Pmlessmmd (OP) S schod IS) Victoria Planned Community Flood Contra (FC) Specific Plan (SP) General Industrial(Gt) - Utility Corridor(UC) - High Residential (H) Very Lev Residential (VL) "Existing Text" Section 17.36.020 B of the Development Code B. Mixed Use Sites. The thirteen (13) mixed use sites with Mixed Use Zoning District designations are listed below. 1. Victoria Gardens[Victoria Arbors 2. Town Center (Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue) 3. Terra Vista 4. Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue 5. Foothill Boulevard between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue 6. Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street 7. Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue 8. Industrial Area Specific Plan (Sub -Area 18) 9. Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel 10. Haven Avenue and Church Street Site 11. Western Gateway (Bear Gulch Area) 12. Foothill Boulevard and Cucamonga Channel Site 13. Historic Alta Loma (Amethyst Site) E—K70 "Proposed Text" Section 17.36.020 B of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows with changes highlighted: B. Mixed Use Sites. The fourteen"(1.4 mixed use sites with Mixed Use Zoning District designations are listed below. 1. Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors 2. Town Center (Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue) 3. Terra Vista 4. Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue 5. Foothill Boulevard between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue 6. Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street 7. Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue 8. Industrial Area Specific Plan (Sub -Area 18) 9. Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel 10. Haven Avenue and Church Street Site 11. Western Gateway (Bear Gulch Area) 12. Foothill Boulevard and Cucamonga Channel Site 13. Historic Alta Loma (Amethyst Site) 1;4. ' NWG_Foothih$oulevard and EastAvenue E—K71 "Existing Table" Table 17.36.020-1 of the Development Code TABLE 17.36.020.1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE SITES Land Use Mix. "w Mixed Use Sites' , :. c 0 Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors 21-36% 20-41 % 5-12% 4-14 du/ac Town Center (Foothill Boulevard and 25-35% 10-15% 30-50% 0-10% 14 du/ac Haven Avenue) Terra Vista 12-15% 85-87% 30 dulac Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa 0-62% 0-100% 20 dulac Avenue and Center Avenue Foothill Boulevard between Archibald 67-70% 30-33% 15-30 Avenue and Hellman Avenue du/ac Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue and 30-40% 60-70% 30 du/ac Hampshire Street Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue 26-50% 40-60% 6 10% 4% 24'-'30 du/ac Industrial Area Specific Plan 11-22% 15-25% 40-60% 7.5% 28 du/ac Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek 70-75% 25-30% 14 dulac Channel Haven Avenue and Church Street Site 0-100% 0-100% 8-14 du/ac Western Gateway (Bear Gulch Area) 30-50% 50-70% 14 du/ac Foothill Boulevard and Cucamonga 8-14 Channel Site 0-100°/0 0-100% du/ac Historic Alta Loma (Amethyst Site) 0-100% 0-100% 14-24 du/ac Table Notes: (1) This table only applies to existing Mixed Use sites. E-K72 "Proposed Table" Table 17.36.020-1 of the Development Code TABLE 17.36.020-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE SITES Land Use Mix- y' � W C Mixed Use SitesIL am o Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors 21-36% 20-41% 5-12% 4-14 du/ac Town Center (Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue) 25-35% 10-15% 30-50% 0-10% 14 dulac Terra Vista 12-15% 85-87% 30 du/ac Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa 0-62% 0-100% 20 du/ac Avenue and Center Avenue Foothill Boulevard between Archibald 15-30 Avenue and Hellman Avenue 67-70% 30-33% du/ac Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street 30-40% 60-70% 30 du/ac Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue 26-50% 40-60% 6-10% 4% 24-30 du/ac Industrial Area Specific Plan 11-22% 15-25% 40-60% 7.5% 28 du/ac Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel 70-75% 25-30% 14 dulac Haven Avenue and Church Street Site 0-100% 0-100% 8-14 Western Gateway (Bear Gulch Area) 30-50% 50-70% 14 du/ac Foothill Boulevard and Cucamonga 8-14 Channel Site D_100% 0-100% du/ac Historic Alta Loma (Amethyst Site) 0-100% 0-100% 14-24 du/ac N!NC,FoothtllBoulevardand;East'Avenue 0-1t)0°Id tl=`100% 1`t-2 du/ag Table Notes: (1) This table only applies to existing Mixed Use sites. E-K73 "Existing Figure" Figure 17.38.060-1 Foothill Boulevard Subareas EXHIBIT E E—K74 SUBAREA l SUBAREA 2 SUBAREA 4 H A i .. 1 SUBAREA,3 11"_ml -. - - Legend-- �raPm eaee.ara:�erc �sr rannxr � CaTrems 0�xt�l Zmng ® %NML , lU Q UFry:W ReaOer-..if R"� 0 ►IQmm Part OP- Q La 9e^a0. Jx is ® GWkB 1 2jW-.& GI' �!'M�l4 tC�myI�RW C-U. ®VMP.exl lrtDtC tYS.y Pt x1.6EY IMerlu. *�-&vtx(M' �!16aNf'I�Oie7x,MI Mfl4T"fj-M1 Rtsla Ral!M" ®FIOMCM"lrc` �re�n zrsarr a ;K p rnen qos to n tm ®Chen SY.,ae =! O Pl9l$G"^P.'[11 cy"rmlal Wl 111t cmm lle Gr1"dl a&wo-_mx (Gcl O yTw r,7; 0 C:f"Wn—'x-mW"icc: :`IeU!cpsrIC.F ®p j^-ax aoa:zl Fr�'fCl+lalrRc Parw cwr jr.•.ylr- "Proposed Figure" Figure 17.38.060-1 of the Development Code is hereby deleted and replaced as follows: Figure 17.38.060-1 Foothill Boulevard Subareas E—K76 M I v V SUBAREAI w ly SUBAREA3 5 — I� a N SUBAREA 2 SUBAREA 4 IPC-NI Tens Vyla PlannM <bnmunXy Legend -- City Limas Specific Plans - Heavy Industrial (HI) Foolhlll Blvd specific Plan Boundary I Enwanda North Specific Plan Hillside Res denial (HRI Overlay Ehwanda Specific Plan Industrial Park BP) I Commercial Mixed Use Overlay Empire Lakes Specific Plan Low Residential (L) ..: Equestrian Overlay Zoning Low -Medium Residentai (LM) .' Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan General Commercial (GC) Medium Residential (M) .. t; Haven Avenue Overlay Community Commercial (CC) ® Medium -High Residential (MH) Hillside Overlay Per Ord 828 Neighharhoptl Commercial (NC) Minimum Impact Heavy Indusinal Senior Housing Overlay l Regional Related Commercial(RRC)Mixed Use fMU) Community Plans Specialty Commercial (SC) ® Open Space (OS) �- Caryn Planned Community - Commercial/Office (CO) Planned Community (PC) — 1 Efiwanda Highlands Planned Community Office Prolessmnal (OP) school is) Terra Vista Planned Community ® Flood Control (FC) Specific Plan (SP) Vittoria Planned Community - General Industrial (GI) - Utility Corridor (UCi - High Residential (H) Very Low Residential (VL) "Existing Figure" Figure 17.38.060-15 Foothill Boulevard Subareas E—K78 m 7z V tD MIRRc� Ik BLY� LLI Ff"orwltr U:n 02 ! Legend Di`.ro!n'J Qou.:nac; :cccrrc rt al Nu'1U!r: ^�;p�•mccaV�Yr. p`:- 44^; �9+r Fearer Ga P+Li ❑•dua�,l r,;l itrl . Ln'r. ?C:IQCni151{_� _j 1'enem, ln7d'a. }([fl [vr. AlwJu•n Fw-.;!wT,rl it Kl iNmnnlm lrtim.; M•aW truhra�r. t1AIM1 M'd.l�»Pc�d:nt�iRli �khyy ny�,%rr�l 11 llJ ' �n,rJnrm-eglx �•.•a!vcn;su, �!ear,a r.�;o-nl;rca tm Hgn;owwlwnuv tx±i Mn��ywtilra@!rnt-Y Mwi F3(]nr•1'r•M!. Ill fCP.. _:(:ppn :frRre{rx",1 Ctetghlg3nv3C'•ynlrmla^tC{'7 '�14!dSr G!rubl Q!'j Ctn§ralctrrremal *Z] '"7 xI1LIDi 15j 'S.httP.4^Ili'j �.lvnl'L129.(��.f `avaFlGPixr!�ti} _'JF,wi_�n�l l�!9Y:1�: nrrt!n'(G��i 'F'a.�caCrrrtrJu9r 11 ti "Proposed Figure" Figure 17.38.060-15 of the Development Code is hereby deleted and replaced as follows: Figure 17.38.060-15 Foothill Boulevard Subareas E—K80 M 1 7z 00 ki '' Legend —•— City Limits Specific Plans - Heavy Industrial (HI) ,0.00r,.rz Q Foothill Blvd Specific Plan Boundary �i Ebwanoa North Specific Plan _ Hillside Residential (HR) Overlay ��I Eliwanda Specific Plan Industrial Park(IP) Commercial Mixed Use Overlay l 1 Empire Lakes Specific Plan Low Residential (L) ... ; Equestrian Overlay Zoning Low -Medium Residential (LM) Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan _ General Commercial (GC) )i Medium Residential (M) Haven Avenue Overlay Community Commercial (CC) - Metlium-High Residential (MH) Hillside Overlay Per Ord, 628 Neighborhood Commercial (NCMinimum Impact Heavy Industrial Senior Housing Overlay Regional Related Commercial (RRC) Mixed Use (MU) Community Plans ® Specialty Commercial (SC) Open Space (OS) Oeryt Planned Community - Commecial/Office (CO) Planned Community (PC) a_ - Edwards Highlands Planned Community - Office Protessionai (OP) - School (a) ` �?n•+� r Tame Vista Manned Community -Flood Control (FC) Specific Plan (SP) Victoria Planned Community - General Industrial (GI) - Utility Corridor (UC) High Residentai (H) Very Low Residential (VI-) m x x 71 mlumom City of Fontana Proposed Zoning � �I � ' Community ,s�. Commercial (CC; Open Space �' '�•�''� •�' Commercial 00 orrice (CO)COE 3 FF FF �M000�� Project Site Mixed Use!(M!U) • Medium Residential (M) City of Fontana THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA WHO CUCAMNCA October 20, 2015 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL To ORDER Roll Call Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca _ Candyce Burnett _ Donald Granger X Alternates: Ray Wimberly _ Lou Munoz_ Rich Macias Additional Staff Present Tabe Van der Zwaag, Associate Planner II II. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS III The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00893 — PETE VOLBEDA — A request for site plan and architecture review of a 7,302 square foot two- story single-family residence and an attached 1,012 square foot garage on a 25,273 square foot lot located in the Very Low (VL) Zoning District at 9251 loamosa Court; APN: 1061-611-15. VARIANCE DRC2014-00894 — PETE VOLBEDA — A request to reduce the rear yard setback related to the construction of a single-family residence on a project site located in the Very Low (VL) Zoning District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) at 9251 loamosa Court; APN: 1061-611-15. 7:00 p.m. A. DRC2014-00893 - Committee recommended approval and forwarded project to PC. EXHIBIT G E-K85 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ANC °N°A October 20, 2015 B. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19945 - FOOTHILL & EAST, LLC - A B. DRC2014-01130- tentative tract map for a proposed 193 unit multi -family apartment project Committee with a potential future retail component on a 7.95 acre site located at the recommended approval and northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; APN's: (onvarded project 1100-201-03, 04 and 07. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-01130, to PC with the Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-01131, General Plan Amendment direction that the DRC2014-01133, Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-01134, and Uniform new Mixed Use Sign Program DRC2015-00318. standards require a minimum of two DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-01130- FOOTHILL & EAST, LLC —A design uses on the protect site and review of a proposed 193 unit multi -family apartment project with a P P y P P 1 the protect would potential future retail component on a 7.55 acre site located at the north need to comply west corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; APN's: 1100-201-03, with this 04 and 07. requirement. The Committee also TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-01134 - FOOTHILL & EAST, LLC - A stated they accept the concept of request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposed 193 unit multi- re q J P reduced parking family apartment project with a potential future retail component on a 7.55 on the project site acre site located at the north west corner of Foothill Boulevard and East as long as the Avenue; APN's: 1100-201-03, 04 and 07. submitted parking study was corroborated by peer review, as required by the new Mixed Use development standards. III. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. IV. ADJOURNMENT 11 8:37 p.m. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. E—K86 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ANCHo AMONOA October 20, 2015 1, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist 11 with the Planning Department for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 8, 2015, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. E—K87 State of California - Natural Resources Agency EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor (x•...,. �. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTONH. BONHAM, Director f. _ Inland Deserts Region 3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-220 Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 484-0459 www.wildlife.ca.gov April 20, 2016 Mr. Tabe Van Der Zwaag Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Subject: Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration La Mirage at Route 66 Project SCH No. 2016031083 Dear Mr. Van Der Zwaag: The Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study (IS) and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the La Mirage at Route 66 Project (project) [SCH No. 2016031083]. The Department is responding to the IS and MND as a Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources (California Fish and Game Code Sections 711.7 and 1802, and the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] Guidelines Section 15386), and as a Responsible Agency regarding any discretionary actions (CEQA Guidelines Section 15381), such as the issuance of a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement (California Fish and Game Code Sections 1600 et seq.) and/or a California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Permit for incidental Take of Endangered, Threatened, and/or Candidate species (California Fish and Game Code Sections 2080 and 2080.1). Project Description The approximately 8.8-acre project site is located north of Foothill Boulevard, west of East Avenue, south of Via Veneto Drive and existing open space, and southeast of Garcia Park; within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California; Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs)1100-201-03, -04, and -07. The proposed project includes a 193-unit, multi -family residential development with the potential for 3,246 square feet of commercial space. Comments and Recommendations Following review of the IS and MND, the Department has identified several concerns related to the project's potential to impact sensitive species, the accuracy of the serving CaCfornia's Wilcfifife Since 1870 EXHIBIT H E—K88 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration La Mirage at Route 66 Project SCH No. 2016031083 Page 2 of 5 biological analysis, and the adequacy and specificity of the proposed mitigation measures, and recommends that the document be revised and recirculated per CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5. The Department offers the comments and recommendations presented below to assist the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City; the CEQA lead agency) in adequately identifying and mitigating the project's significant, or potentially significant, impacts on biological resources: Biological Survevs A reconnaissance -level biological survey was performed on the proposed project site on April 13, 2009. A letter updating the biological survey, dated December 19, 2014, was included with the IS and MND. However, the December 19, 2014 letter did not indicate whether or when updated biological surveys were performed. Because the suite of species present on any given site may change from year to year due to variations in weather, larger -scale variations in climate (e.g., drought), changes in surrounding land use, local extirpations/recolonizations, and natural movement, the Department typically considers biological surveys to be valid for a period of one year. The survey results included with the IS/MND are out of date and should be updated prior to recirculation of the CEQA document. Sensitive SDecies Analvsis The May, 2009 Biological Letter Report's analysis of the potential for sensitive species to occur onsite is incomplete and contains inaccuracies. For example, in addition to inaccuracies regarding Los Angeles pocket mouse and San Bernardino kangaroo rat habitat, the report fails to analyze the potential for white-tailed kite, loggerhead shrike, San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit, western mastiff bat, San Diego desert woodrat, silvery legless lizard, or Brand's star phacelia, all of which have been observed within the Guasti quad according to the Department's California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). In order to obtain a more complete analysis of the potential biological resources present, the Department recommends reviewing CNDDB observations within a 9-quad area around the project site. Please include the complete revised analysis with the recirculated CEQA document. Potential Imoacts to San Bernardino Kanoaroo Rat Page 10 of the May,'2009 Biological Letter Report states that San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR; Dipodomys merriami parvus) is "restricted to alluvial fan sage scrub and would not be expected to occur outside of that habitat." This is incorrect. SBKR have been known to occur in a number of upland habitats, including habitat types that were previously thought to be unsuitable, such as non-native grasslands and agricultural orchards (USFWS 2009). Because the project site is located within an area that has historically been occupied by SBKR, and due to the 2002 observations of SBKR approximately 2 miles to the north of the site (CDFW 2016), the Department E—K89 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration La Mirage at Route 66 Project SCH No. 2016031083 Page 3 of 5 recommends that the updated biological surveys include the results of focused trapping surveys for SBKR, as well as other sensitive small mammals which may be present on - site. If SBKR are determined to be present on or near the project site, then the project may require formal consultation with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to obtain an Incidental Take Permit pursuant to Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act. Potential Impacts to Los Angeles Pocket Mouse Page 10 of the May, 2009 Biological Letter Report also incorrectly states that the Los Angeles pocket mouse (LAPM; Perognathus longimembris brevinasus) has no potential to occur on the project site and that LAPM 'requires Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub habitats." The CNDDB contains records of LAPM in non-native grasslands, coastal sage scrub, chaparral, weedy/ruderal areas, and in at least one instance, in or near a eucalyptus grove. According to the United States Geological Survey's Web Soil Survey, the site is underlain by Tujunga gravelly loamy sand, which is suitable for LAPM (Dudek & Associates 2003). Based on the presence of mapped suitable soils and the CNDDB record of the species adjacent to the south end of the project site, the Department recommends that the updated biological surveys include small mammal trapping. If suitable habitat exists on -site and no trapping occurs, the species should be assumed to be present and project impacts to the species should be analyzed and mitigated accordingly. Please note that LAPM is a state -designated S1S2 "imperiled" to "critically imperiled" species, and the Department considers both direct take of LAPM and loss of its occupied habitat to be significant adverse impacts. If LAPM are either demonstrated or assumed to be present, the Department recommends project impacts be mitigated through the permanent preservation, enhancement, and long-term management of habitat currently occupied by LAPM. Note that mitigation should be commensurate with impacts, and should consider both temporal and permanent habitat loss. Species of Special Concern The IS states that "[t]he Biological Survey finds that the project will potentially impact State and Federal Species of Special Concern, including the California horned lark, San Diego pocket mouse and coastal [sic] horned lizard if they are present when the project site is graded," but that "the project will have a less than significant impact on these species as it would not remove significant population centers or populations near the extent of their range and high quality habitat does not exist on the project site." However, without conducting focused surveys, it is not possible to determine whether populations of Species of Special Concern (SSCs) exist on the project site and within the surrounding open space. E—K90 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration La Mirage at Route 66 Project SCH No. 2016031083 Page 4 of 5 The Department considers the loss of habitat occupied by SSCs to be a potentially significant impact. Furthermore, if a population of less mobile SSCs (i.e., species which would likely have difficulty crossing Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue, such as LAPM and coast horned lizard) is present on -site, then the development of the project is likely to remove a significant portion of the habitat that is currently easily accessible to the population. The Department recommends that file City include a thorough and detailed analysis of the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts to SSCs from both a local and regional perspective in the revised and recirculated CEQA document. Native and Drouaht-Tolerant Landscaoin The IS/MND proposes to remove 184 eucalyptus trees and replace them with 267 new trees in order to comply with the City's Development Code Section 17.80.040 (Tree Replacement Policy), The proposed replacement trees include 52 peppermint gums (Eucalyptus nicholil) and 36 date palms (Phoenix dactylifera). In the interest of maximizing the value to wildlife, minimizing the potential to spread invasive and non- native plant species, providing opportunities for residents to view and appreciate native California tree species, and potentially reducing landscape irrigation needs, the Department encourages the City to consider replacing the trees with locally native tree species, such as California fan palm (Washingtonia filifera), western sycamore (Platanus racemosa), western redbud (Cercis occidentalis), and coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia). Although the site is located within a heavily developed area, planting native tree species would provide habitat and forage value to urban -adapted wildlife species. Further Coordination The Department appreciates the opportunity to comment on the IS and MND for the Tentative Tract No. 19917 Project (SCH No. 2016021034), and requests that the City address the Department's comments and concerns prior to the MND's adoption. If you should have any questions pertaining to these comments, please contact Gabriele Quillman at (909) 980-3818 or gabriele.quillman@wildlife.ca.gov. Sincerely, L i FNa N egi nal nager cc: State Clearinghouse, Sacramento E—K91 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration La Mirage at Route 66 Project SCH No. 2016031083 Page 5 of 5 Literature Cited CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2016. California Natural Diversity Database (available by subscription) and Rarefind. CDFW: Sacramento, California. Updated March 2016. Dudek & Associates. 2003. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Final MSHCP, Volumes l and 11. Prepared for County of Riverside Transportation and Lands Management Agency by Dudek & Associates, Inc. Approved June 17, 2003. NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2015. Web Soil Survey. United States Department of Agriculture. Online: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoiiSurvey.aspx. USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 2009. San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys merriamus parvus) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. https://www.fws.gov/carlsbad/SpeciesStatusList/5YR/20090814 5YR SB I<R.pdf E—K92 Kinsinger Environmental Consulting; 5700 Baltimore Dr. H53, La Mesa CA 91942 Tel/Fax: 877-593-6275 Cell: 760-846-2649 E-Mail happydeb@gmail.com May, 4 2016 Department of Fish and Wildlife Inland Deserts Region 3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-220 Ontario, CA 91764 Reply To: Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration; La Mirage at Route 66 Project SCH No. 2016031083 Dear Ms. Quillman: Kinsinger Environmental Consulting (KEC) thanks you for the opportunity to respond to the comments on the IS/MND for the La Mirage at Route 66 Project. This project is an 8.8-acre project site is located north of Foothill Boulevard, west of East Avenue, south of Via Veneto Drive and existing open space, and southeast of Garcia Park; within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California; Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) 1100-201-03, -04, and -07. The proposed project includes a 193-unit, multi -family residential development with the potential for 3,246 square feet of commercial space. Comments and Recommendations Following review of the IS and MIND, the Department has identified several concerns related to the project's potential to impact sensitive species, the accuracy of the biological analysis, and the adequacy and Specificity of the proposed mitigation measures, and recommends that the document be revised and -ecirculated per CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5. The Department offers the comments and recommendations presented below to assist the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City; the CEQA lead agency) in adequately identifying and mitigating the project's significant, or potentially significant, impacts on biological resources: Summary We offer the following responses to CDFW's Comments and Recommendations according to each comment. In general we provide supporting evidence to show that the project site has been "developed" as an agricultural/commercial woodlot for over 80 years. Aerial survey and historical evidence indicates that it has never been RAFSS habitat. Habitat loss acquisition mitigation is not required for lands that were put under agriculture for orchards that remain orchards today and should likewise not be required for this parcel, just as jurisdictional wetlands that are "prior converted" agricultural land have no jurisdictional nexus. While offsite habitat may be suitable for SBKR or LAPM or other California Species of Special Concern (SSQ, we present trapping evidence that show the potentially suitable habitat adjacent to the project site is isolated from occupied SBKR to the north and that adjacent suitable habitat, now lost to development was not occupied in 2006 or 2012 so those species, since they were not present would not have sought refuge by crossing the Foothill Boulevard barrier. Furthermore no LAPM or SBKR have been trapped within the adjacent SCE alignment south of Baseline Road or north of 8th street according to Steve Montgomery who trapped the alignment for the Falcon Ridge project. Finally our summary concludes that some additional mitigation measures, such as exclusion fencing and pre- onstruction monitoring of the fence line may be required to prevent potentially occurring SSC in adjacent suitable iabitat from accessing the project site. Since we conclude that there is no potential for LAPM or SBKR to occur on KEC Response to CDFW IS/MND SCH201603108 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT I E—K93 Kinsinger Environmental Consulting; 5700 Baltimore Dr. #53, La Mesa CA 91942 Tel/Fax: 877-593-6275 Cell: 760-846-2649 E-Mail happydeb@gmail.com site or significant populations of Species of Concern; there is no substantial new information or significant impacts that would require recirculation of the IS/MND. Biological Surveys A reconnaissance -level biological survey was performed on the proposed project site on April 13, 2009. A letter updating the biological survey, dated December 19, 2014, was included with the IS and MND. However, the December 19, 2014 letter did not indicate whether or when updated biological surveys were performed. Survey Methods Meandering surveys were conducted on foot using a handheld GPS and photo documenting the site from known location. The GPS data was transferred to GIS to evaluate locations of identified features. An updated habitat survey was conducted on Dec 9, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 5:15 pm. The sky was hazy and sunny with temperatures ranging from 75 degrees F at noon to 67 degrees F by early evening. Wind speed ranged at 5 to 6 mph most of the day with occasional gusts to 15 mph. Because the suite of species present on any given site may change from year to year due to variations in weather, larger -scale variations in climate (e.g., drought), changes in surrounding land use, local extirpations/recolonizations, and natural movement, the Department typically considers biological surveys to be valid for a period of one year. The survey results included with the IS/MND are out of date and should be updated prior to recirculation of the CEQA document. The assessment was updated again on April 28, 2016 from 10:21 am to 2:04 pm. Conditions were cloudy with wind speeds averaging less than 2 miles per hour (mph) with gusts up to 10 mph. Temperature ranged from 63 degrees Fahrenheit (F)in the am to 69 degrees in the pm. Both the 2014 survey and 2016 surveys included an inventory of: • Plant and bird species on site • An assessment of potential habitat for western burrowing owl (BUOW) and burrowing mammals using GPS to map potential dens in suitable habitat up to 500 feet outside the project perimeter • Indications of track or sign and food and nesting sources for San Diego desert woodrat, coast horned lizard, San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit, and any species of kangaroo rat. (San Diego desert woodrat and San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit were inadvertently omitted from the potential species list in the 2009 survey but the habitat was assessed at that time for signs that they occurred on site by examining track, scat and potential dens. • In 2016 the habitat was also assessed for white-tailed kite, loggerhead shrike, San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit, western mastiff bat, San Diego desert woodrat, silvery legless lizard, and Brand's star phacelia (see updated potential species table in the appendix to this letter.) • The survey 2014 survey included a detailed assessment of tree health and size for the arborist update. Currently and in most years in the spring, the site's understory is densely covered in non-native annual grasses. In the summer grasses die and the thatch is lost in some areas due to use by BMX bikes with improvised trails and jumps. These areas are sandy enough to support coast horned lizard but ant nests were not observed in those areas in the 2014 or 2016 surveys and no coast horned lizards were observed. Several other lizard species occur on site (See species list 2014) and one new species was added in 2016, granite spiny lizard. San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit requires open space between shrubs so the site would provide suitable access only in late summer and winter. KEC Response to CDFW IS/MND SCH201603108 Page 2 of 9 E—K94 Kinsinger Environmental Consulting; 5700 Baltimore Dr. #53, La Mesa CA 91942 Tel/Fax: 877-593-6275 Cell: 760-846-2649 E-Mail happydeb@gmail.com Scat and tracks of ground squirrels were noted in 2016 and their burrow complexes were noted and mapped with SPS to support pre -construction burrowing owl surveys. Each burrow in the complex was evaluated for sign of BUOW or mammals other than California ground squirrel. No kangaroo rat scat, tail drag or prints were seen. California ground squirrels were observed using burrows and their scat and tracks were observed at burrow entrances. No BUOW pellets, feathers, or den entrance aprons were observed. Potential den investigations included discarded concrete piles, used tires, and other debris with potential to provide denning habitat were investigated and mapped with GPS in addition to ground squirrel burrow complexes. Potential food sources for coast horned lizards were only observed outside that parcel boundaries in the access roads within the Southern California Edison (SCE) transmission alignment. Three nests were identified in 2016 two red ant nests and one black ant nest, along the east, north and west perimeters of the project site. None of these nests were harvester ants. Two species of burrowing mammal were identified in the 2009 survey as having some potential to occur during dry periods when the site is not densely covered by grasses; northwestern San Diego pocket mouse and southern grasshopper mouse. Suitable habitat may occur off site within the SCE alignment for coast horned lizard, San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit, San Diego pocket mouse and southern grasshopper mouse. In dry years, late summer and winter some portions of the habitat are partially barren within the understory and may provide temporary access to these species. Plant species were evaluated again in 2016 and seven previously unidentified species were observed: Ambrosia rsilostochyc, Centourea melitensis, Chenopodium album, Datura sp., Melilotus indicus., Nicotiona glauca and v7orrubium vulgare. These species except Ambrosia and Datura are non-native and all are ruderal or invasive. One new native species was added that is not ruderal, Cryptantha sp. Sensitive Species Analysis The May, 2009 Biological Letter Report's analysis of the potential for sensitive species to occur onsite is incomplete and contains inaccuracies. For example, in addition to inaccuracies regarding Los Angeles pocket mouse and San Bernardino kangaroo rat habitat, the report fails to analyze the potential for white- tailed kite, loggerhead shrike, San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit, western mastiff bat, San Diego desert woodrat, silvery legless lizard, or Brand's star phacelia, all of which have been observed within the Guasti quad according to the Department's California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). In order to obtain a more complete analysis of the potential biological resources present, the Department recommends reviewing CNDDB observations within a 9-quad area around the project site. Please include the complete revised analysis with the recirculated CEQA document. The initial CNDDB query used for the 2009 and 2014 studies began with a 10-mile and 20-mile radius query for an initial evaluation of the distribution of sensitive species. GIS spatial queries then filter out montaine elevations to exclude species that would not occur on the valley floor an desert habitats. Mojave and Colorado desert areas were spatially excluded. The Santa Ana River is partially within the boundary of the 10-mile query area. Some species that are known to be exclusive to riparian wetland, alkali playa and vernal pools common to the emaining patches of native habitat on the valley floor were excluded from consideration. Species that were onsidered but excluded from discussion in the biological studies were evaluated based on accession records in KEC Response to CDFW IS/MND SCH201603108 Page 3 of 9 E—K95 Kinsinger Environmental Consulting; 5700 Baltimore Dr. #53, La Mesa CA 91942 Tel/Fax: 877-593-6275 Cell: 760-846-2649 E-Mail happydeb@gmail.com Consortium of California Herbaria and (Roberts, 2004) The Vascular Plants of Western Riverside county, California which has short descriptions of the species distribution which includes species within San Bernardino County within the basin. Although we used a different method of evaluating potentially occurring species than CDFW's recommendation, using GIS to query, evaluate and map potentially occurring species is a widely accepted practice within the industry and equally suitable to CDFW's recommended method. Potentially occurring species not already do the table in the 2009 survey will be updated and added to that table. A summary of the updated potential species list for the aforementioned species are as follows: • White-tailed kite has moderate potential roosting habitat on site with suitable grasslands off site for foraging. If it used the site routinely, this resident species would likely have been seen during one of the three surveys. • Loggerhead shrike has moderate potential roosting habitat on site with suitable source of water in the concrete channel east of East Avenue as a foraging source for insects, and chain link fence along the channel to impale its prey and adjacent grasslands. It is not typically a species of urban environments and nesting on site is unlikely. It is a resident bird and if it used the site routinely for foraging it would likely have been observed in one of the three surveys. • Horned lark nests on the ground in grasslands and has potential to occur on or offsite, breeding season avoidance will mitigate potential impacts • Western mastiff bat has moderate potential roosting habitat on site with suitable source of water in the concrete channel east of East Ave. as a source for insects. However, nursery roosts are typically tight rock crevices and do not occur on site. • San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit prefers scrub habitats with openings for quick escapes. The grassland within the SCE alignment adjacent to the site has scarce and scattered scrub species and there is a scrub habitat within the detention basin to the west of the project site. San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit has a moderate potential to occur in the adjacent grassland and was observed in other surveys south of Foothill Blvd. It may make a transient pass through the project site especially during winter months when grass is dead but very low potential to routinely use on -site habitat. The dense grass and ruderal species understory of the eucalyptus woodland is not suitable habitat. • San Diego desert woodrat typically occurs in scrub or chaparral habitat with rock outcrops or mixed wooded/scrub habitat under trees. Dens are easy to identify with sticks wedged and piled among boulders and the dens are used for multiple years. While there is a moderate potential for the species to use piles of discarded concrete that provide some artificial habitat off -site to the west and in the parking area along East Avenue, those sites lack suitable scrub species for foraging and there was no sign of the species having used the site in the past or currently. • Silvery legless lizard is a species of scrub habitat in loose sandy soil with high moisture content where it burrows just under the surface. While there is loose soil on site, there is no scrub habitat for foraging or cover. While it has a moderate potential to occur in the scrub habitat within the detention basin offsite to the west, its low mobility would make the chance of it occurring in the unsuitable habitat on site very low and it is not expected to occur. • Brand's phacelia is scarce and is known from only two collections, one more than 75 years ago. Both from the same general area near the Santa Ana River (Roberts, 2004). With no riparian habitat on site, and due to its limited distribution, it is not expected to occur. No species of phacelia were observed on site. Potential Impacts to San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Page 10 of the May, 2009 Biological Letter Report states that San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR; Dipodomys merriami parvus) is 'restricted to alluvial fan sage scrub and would not be expected to occur KEC Response to CDFW IS/MND SCH2O1603108 Page 4 of 9 E—K96 Kinsinger Environmental Consulting; 5700 Baltimore Dr. #53, La Mesa CA 91942 Tel/Fax: 877-593-6275 Cell: 760-846-2649 E-Mail happydeb@gmail.com outside of that habitat." This is incorrect. SBKR have been known to occur in a number of upland habitats, including habitat types that were previously thought to be unsuitable, such as non-native grasslands and agricultural orchards (USFWS 2009). Because the project site is located within an area that has historically been occupied by SBKR, and due to the 2002 observations of SBKR approximately 2 miles to the north of the site (CDFW 2016), the Department Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration La Mirage at Route 66 Project SCH No. 2016031083 Page 3 of 5 recommends that the updated biological surveys include the results of focused trapping surveys for SBKR, as well as other sensitive small mammals which may be present onsite. If SBKR are determined to be present on or near the project site, then the project may require formal consultation with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to obtain an Incidental Take Permit pursuant to Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act. It is true that SBKR are not exclusive to Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS), but locations where they have been trapped outside of RAFFS habitat were either historically RAFFS habitat or adjacent to persistent RAFSS habitat. Aerial photos from 1938 show that the source of flow for the RAFSS habitat that occurred south of Foothill Blvd. on the site that is now the San Sevaine Villas, came from the north east corner across what is now the intersection of Foothill Blvd. and East Avenue. The channel follows the elevation contours to the east. Superficially, with the current urban development and channelization of the Day Creek tributary, it appears as though the habitat may have extended from the north at the site of the present Eucalyptus woodland. This project site was never a part of the active alluvial flood channel seen in the historical aerial photos. It stands to reason that if it were, it would not have been chosen as a site for planting a commercial woodlot more than 80 years ago. They would have planted outside the flood channel. This site has been isolated from potential habitat by Foothill Blvd., East Avenue and the channelization of Day Creek and orchards since 1948. Neither SBKR or LAPM would not have persisted in orchards and woodlots over that period of time. In 2006 the potentially suitable RAFSS habitat identified in the CNDDB map south of Foothill Blvd, Figure 1 of the La Mirage 2009 Biological Letter Report, was trapped for the current San Sevaine Villas project (LSA, 2006). In a letter of correspondence between the environmental contractor, LSA, to the USFWS, surveyors did not trap any SBKR or LAPM during the protocol trapping period. Thirty-three deer mice were trapped. In the 2012 trapping surveys for the Lennar housing development that extends south from the boundary of the San Sevaine Villas to Arrow Way on the remaining RAFSS habitat (TTM SUBTT 18870 APN 0229-041-09 City of Rancho Cucamonga IS/MND, 2012) no SBKR or North Western San Diego Pocket Mouse or Los Angeles Pocket Mouse (LAPM) were trapped in the protocol surveys. "Ant species were in abundance and suitable habitat' for coast horned lizard were present although no coast horned lizard were detected." (M. J. Klinefelter, 2013) Potential habitat to the north in the Lytle Creek Critical Habitat and conservation areas has been isolated from the La Mirage site by orchards, roads, housing developments and the channelized culvert for many decades. SBKR are prevented from dispersing south through the SCE alignment from known populations in Lytle Creek Critical Habitat east of 1-15 by the 210 freeway. There is currently no natural physical path for individuals from known locations north of Wilson Avenue to disperse to the La Mirage site. Current monitoring and recent trapping for the Wilson Avenue extension, north of freeway 210 has had negative results for SBKR many years (Shay 2012). Annual monitoring over the last decade for the San Sevaine Creek Water Project in the Etiwanda SBKR Critical Habitat has confirmed three reports of SBKR and one LAPM out of 23 trap sessions with 150 traps each. All were elocated north of the water project footprint. The San Sevaine detention basin #5 is northwest of 1-15 / 210 =reeway interchange and is surrounded by SBKR exclusion fencing. The fencing in combination with the freeway KEC Response to CDFW IS/MND SCH2O1603108 Page 5 of 9 E—K97 Kinsinger Environmental Consulting; 5700 Baltimore Dr. #53, La Mesa CA 51942 Tel/Fax: 877-593-6275 Cell: 760-846-2649 E-Mail happydeb@gmail.com interchange forms an effective physical barrier preventing potential dispersal of those relocated individuals south of the 210 freeway or east of the 1-15 into the SCE alignment. If any individuals persisted in the grasslands adjacent to the La Mirage project site, impacts from transient access by potentially occurring SBKR individuals in grasslands adjacent to the La Mirage site could be prevented by conducting pre -construction monitoring in advance of installing exclusion fencing during the winter when activity is lowest due to cold temperatures and limited food sources. We conclude that there is no potential for SBKR to occur on site and impacts to potentially occurring individuals in the adjacent grasslands can be mitigated with exclusion fencing placed during the appropriate winter conditions. Potential Impacts to Los Angeles Pocket Mouse Page 10 of the May, 2009 Biological Letter Report also incorrectly states that the Los Angeles pocket mouse (LAPM; Perognathus longimembris brevinasus) has no potential to occur on the project site and that LAPM "requires Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub habitats." The CNDDB contains records of LAPM in non-native grasslands, coastal sage scrub, chaparral, weedy/ruderal areas, and in at least one instance, in or near a eucalyptus grove. According to the United States Geological Survey's Web Soil Survey, the site is underlain by Tujunga gravelly loamy sand, which is suitable for LAPM (Dudek &Associates 2003). Based on the presence of mapped suitable soils and the CNDDB record of the species adjacent to the south end of the project site, the Department recommends that the updated biological surveys include small mammal trapping. If suitable habitat exists on -site and no trapping occurs, the species should be assumed to be present and project impacts to the species should be analyzed and mitigated accordingly. Please note that LAPM is a state -designated S1 S2 "imperiled" to "critically imperiled" species, and the Department considers both direct take of LAPM and loss of its occupied habitat to be significant adverse impacts. If LAPM are either demonstrated or assumed to be present, the Department recommends project impacts be mitigated through the permanent preservation, enhancement, and long-term management of habitat currently occupied by LAPM. Note that mitigation should be commensurate with impacts, and should consider both temporal and permanent habitat loss. Based on the aerial photo evidence relied upon for the discussion of SBKR habitat above, the La Mirage project site was never a part of the active alluvial flood channel seen in the historical aerial photos. Although Steve Montgomery trapped two LAPM within SCE alignment from the edge of Lytle Creek Cajon Wash Critical Habitat at Summit Avenue in the grassland habitats as far south as Baseline Avenue, the only significant population of LAPM occurs within the SCE alignment further south of Foothill Blvd near 8t1 street. Examination of the historical aerials reveal that there was a pond, vernal pool or depression at this location as recently as 2002 as well as in 1938 when it was clearly adjacent to the alluvial flood channel with RAFSS habitat. Currently, a significant population of LAPM occurs in the relictual RAFSS habitat in the location of the abandoned Day Creek flood channel. We contend that significant populations of LAPM like the one found in the survey within the SCE alignment at 8tn Street are exclusive to grasslands adjacent to suitable RAFSS habitat and RAFSS. There is no extant RAFSS habitat north of Foothill Blvd adjacent to the La Mirage site. Furthermore, trapping for the San Sevaine Villas and Lennar projects in the suitable RAFSS habitat in the abandoned Day Creek flood channel south of foothill Blvd had negative results in both the RAFSS habitats and grassland habitats for the years 2006 and again in 2012. These parcels are now developed. KEC Response to CDFW IS/MND SCH2O1603108 Page 6 of 9 Kinsinger Environmental Consulting; 5700 Baltimore Dr. #53, La Mesa CA 91942 Tel/Fax: 877-593-6275 Cell: 760-846-2649 E-Mail happydeb@gmail.com If an individual LAPM dispersed from the known population at 81h Street northward through the SCE alignment and across Foothill Blvd. to the grasslands adjacent to the La Mirage project site, we could prevent impacts from transient access to the La Mirage site by conducting pre -construction monitoring in advance of installing exclusion fencing during the peak aestivation in the winter when temperatures are cold and food sources are limited. We conclude that there is no potential for significant populations of LAPM to occur on or adjacent to the La Mirage site. Impacts to potentially occurring individuals in the adjacent grasslands can be mitigated with exclusion fencing placed during the appropriate winter conditions. Based on the data from studies conducted since the original 2009 Biological Letter Report in habitat surrounding the La Mirage project area, there are no changes from the original findings regarding the potential for significant impacts to LAPM to occur. No change in the significance of the potential impacts identified in the IS/MND would occur Species of Special Concern The IS states that "[tjhe Biological Survey finds that the project will potentially impact State and Federal Species of Special Concern, including the California horned lark, San Diego pocket mouse and coastal [sic] horned lizard if they are present when the project site is graded," but that "the project will have a less than significant impact on these species as it would not remove significant population centers or populations near the extent of their range and high quality habitat does not exist on the project site." However, without conducting focused surveys, it is not possible to determine whether populations of Species of Special Concern (SSCs) exist on the project site and within the surrounding open space. The Department considers the loss of habitat occupied by SSCs to be a potentially significant impact. =urthermore, if a population of less mobile SSCs (i.e., species which would likely have difficulty crossing =oothill Boulevard and East Avenue, such as LAPM and coast horned lizard) is present on -site, then the development of the project is likely to remove a significant portion of the habitat that is currently easily accessible to the population. The Department recommends that the City include a thorough and detailed analysis of the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts to SSCs from both a local and regional perspective in the revised and recirculated CEQA document. The combined survey data for the grassland and RAFSS habitats in the vicinity of the La Mirage site piece together the distribution of some of the potentially occurring SSC species in the vicinity. The Northwestern San Diego pocket mouse was not trapped in the San Sevaine Villa or Lennar project focused surveys. The IS/MIND for the Lennar project cited that Steve Montgomery observed "abundant ant colonies", the coast horned lizard's food source, on the Lennar development site during trapping surveys he conducted in 2012, although no coast horned lizard were detected. A San Diego black tailed jackrabbit was detected on the Lennar site. Burrowing owl were detected during the Lennar and San Sevaine Villa project surveys. San Sevaine trapping surveys detected 33 deer mice and the Lennar trapping detected a "low" number of deer mice and a San Diego desert woodrat. In summary, detections of SSC mammals and other SSC were low in number and distribution even in the relictual RAFSS habitat on the San Sevaine Villa and Lennar project surveys. The La Mirage site lacks suitable habitat for SSC flora and fauna due to dense grassland understory and the overstory of Eucalyptus woodland. Only two harvester ant nests were observed and those were along the perimeter of the parcel. Coast horned lizard and other small or larger mammals and reptiles have access to the site where they may occur on adjacent grasslands. Impacts from transient access to the La Mirage site can be prevented by conducting pre -construction monitoring in advance of nstalling exclusion fencing during the winter when temperatures are cold and food sources are limited. KEC Response to CDFW IS/MND SCH201603108 Page 7 of 9 E—K99 Kinsinger Environmental Consulting; 5700 Baltimore Dr. #53, La Mesa CA 91942 Tel/Fax: 877-593-6275 Cell: 760-846-2649 E-Mail happydeb@gmail.com The potential for impacts to potentially occurring BUOW can be mitigated by conducting 30-day pre -construction surveys and other birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) require a pre -construction survey within 3 days of ground or vegetation disturbing activity. If BUOW are present, they would be passively excluded from their burrows by a qualified BUOW biologist outside of the breeding season and when eggs, chicks or fledges are not present. Exclusion fencing will prevent impacts to San Diego black tailed jackrabbit if it occurs in adjacent habitat as well as impacts to SSC small mammals and reptiles that would be expected to occur mostly outside of the project area. No change in the significance of the impact identified in the IS/MND would occur to these species as it would not remove significant population centers or populations near the extent of their range and high quality habitat does not exist on the project site. Any detected within the exclusion zone may be captured and removed to a location outside the exclusion fencing. Native and Drought -Tolerant Landscaping The IS/MND proposes to remove 184 eucalyptus trees and replace them with 267 new trees in order to comply with the City's Development Code Section 17.80.040 (Tree Replacement Policy). The proposed replacement trees include 52 peppermint gums (Eucalyptus nicholii) and 36 date palms (Phoenix dactylifera). In the interest of maximizing the value to wildlife, minimizing the potential to spread invasive and nonnative plant species, providing opportunities for residents to view and appreciate native California tree species, and potentially reducing landscape irrigation needs, the Department encourages the City to consider replacing the trees with locally native tree species, such as California fan palm (Washingtonia filifera) , western sycamore (Platanus racemosa), western redbud (Cercis occidentalis), and coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia). Although the site is located within a heavily developed area, planting native tree species would provide habitat and forage value to urban -adapted wildlife species. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has developed the Route 66 Foothill boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan specifically to address the City's unique heritage. The La Mirage site at the intersection of Foothill Blvd. and East Ave. is the "gateway entrance' to the city. The plan calls for the specific array of species cited in the above text to be used for "streetscapes and public rights -of -way entry areas along the entire length of Historic Route 66". A change to the planting pallet for this project would require revisiting the Visual Improvement Plan, and a change to the City's code regarding tree replacement policy. The City will take CDFW's suggestions for possible changes into consideration for future planning and amendments to City code. Mitigation to avoid direct impacts Amendments to mitigation measures are recommend for revision as follows (with changes to the original in italics): • Site brushing, grading and/or removal any vegetation within 300 feet of any known raptor or migratory songbird nesting location will: o Not be permitted during the spring/summer, songbird, breeding season, February 1 to August 31 of each year, in order to ensure compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or o Construction and ground disturbing activated will not take place within 300 feet of nesting songbirds or raptors or 500 feet for burrowing owls If the biologist is unable to verify whether (a) adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation: or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. aad A biological monitor shall be present to prevent impacts within this active nest zone during construction by flagging the Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) KEC Response to CDFW IS/MND SCH201603108 Page 8 of 9 E—K100 Kinsinger Environmental Consulting; 5700 Baltimore Dr. #53, La Mesa CA 91942 Tel/Fax: 877-593-6275 Cell: 760-846-2649 E-Mail happydeb@gmail.com with wooden stakes and flagging or tape around the work -exclusion perimeter. The work -exclusion zone will be maintained until a qualified wildlife biologist determines that the nesting cycle is complete. o A 3-day pre -construction survey is required for raptor nests and other migratory birds if construction will occur from February 1 to August 31. o A 30-day pre -construction survey for presence of burrowing owls is required if construction occurs from April 15—July 15 & Dec. 1—Jan 31 o if burrowing owl occur on the project they will be passively excluded by a qualified biologist once their reproductive status has been determined and no eggs, chicks or fledges are present. • A small mammal exclusion fence will be installed around the north and west perimeter of the project site during winter months to prevent transient access to the site from potentially occurring Species of Special Concern or SBKR or LAPM in the unlikely event that they are present in the grasslands off site. • Runoff from project must be treated and directed to a storm drain system that does not drain into the Etiwanda Creek channel south of Foothill Blvd. • Provide a fire exclusion wall around the project site, subject to approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the local fire department to avoid accidental ignitions on highly flammable grasslands adjacent to the project site. • Should any future improvements be required outside the project footprint and parcel boundaries, they should be subject to environmental review. In summary, there are no substantial changes to the conclusions drawn in the 2009 and 2014 biological studies and no substantive changes need be made to the IS/MND that would require recirculation. Recommendations by CDFW for additional measures to avoid significant impacts to sensitive species can be mitigated with exclusion fencing. -iterature research of the habitats surrounding the site and of known populations of LAPM and SBKR confirm the sites physical and geographic isolation from low mobility species. Since the site is not and never has been RAFSS habitat and no relictual RAFSS habitat remains adjacent to the site no sensitive habitat will be lost and no significant impacts to sensitive habitats or species will occur. Bibliography Roberts, F. (2004). The VAscular Plant of Western Riverside County, California: An Annotated Checklist. San Luis Rey, CA: F.M. Roberts Publications. KEC Response to CDFW IS/MND SCH2O1603108 Page 9 of 9 E-K101 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-01131, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945, Development Review DRC2014-01130, Minor Exception DRC2016-00169, Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-01134 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2015-00318. 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Project: The applicant is requesting site plan and architectural review (DRC2014- 01130) of a 193-unit, multi -family residential development on 8.8 acres of land at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. The project includes a 3,246 square foot area that can be converted from the proposed residential use (3 residential units) to leasable commercial tenant space in the future. The project includes the following related entitlements: 1) A Development Code Amendment (DRC2014-01132) to: a) clarify permitted uses in the Mixed Use Zoning Districts by amending Development Code Table 17.36.020-2 (Development Standards for Mixed Use Zoning Districts) by adding 2 separate footnotes clarifying the permitted uses within the Mixed Use Districts, b) modify the facts, figures and tables in Development Code Section 17.36.020, to add the project site as Mixed Use area #14 to the current 13 Mixed Use areas within the City and Figures 17.38,060-1 and 17.38.060-15, to change the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed Use (Subarea 4 Map): 2) Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-01131) to change the zoning designation for the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed Use; 3) Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT19945) for the creation of a one lot condominium map; 4) Minor Exception (DRC2016-00169) to reduce the required on -site parking; 5) Tree Removal Permit (DRC2014-01134) for the removal of 184 on -site Eucalyptus trees; and 6) Uniform Sign Program (DRC2015-00318) for project signage. 4. Project Sponsor Name and Address: Foothill and East, LLC 6300 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1420 Los Angeles, CA 90048 5. General Plan Designation: General Commercial 6. Zoning: Mixed Use 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 8.8 acre project site is located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. The site was historically used as a wood lot and includes 184 remnant eucalyptus trees along with non-native grasses. The site drains generally from north to south. To the north is vacant land within the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district, to the west is a utility corridor within the Open Space (OS) zoning district, to the east are single-family residences within the city of Fontana and to the south is a multi -family development within the Medium (M) zoning district. There is an existing Cucamonga Valley Water District pumping station located at the northwest corner of the project site 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive EXHIBIT J E—K102 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tabe van der Zwaag (909) 477-2750, extension 4316 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: NA GLOSSARY — The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD — California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD — Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR — Environmental Impact Report FEIR — Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx — Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PMio — Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB — Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD — South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP — Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than -Significant -Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓) Aesthetics (✓) Biological Resources (✓) Greenhouse Gas Emissions () Land Use & Planning () Population & Housing () Trans portation/Traffic (✓) Agricultural Resources (✓) Cultural Resources () Hazards & Waste Materials () Mineral Resources () Public Services () Utilities & Service Systems (✓) Air Quality (✓) Geology & Soils (✓) Hydrology & Water Quality (✓) Noise () Recreation (✓) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (✓) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Rev 9-29-15 E—K103 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, Including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed n the proposed project, nothing further is required. o,,. V X Date: Reviewed By:Date Rev 9-29-15 E—K104 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentiaty significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? () () () (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The site is located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue and is characterized by vacant land to the north, a utility corridor to the west, single-family residential development to the east and multi -family residential development to the south. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No.87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (✓) Williamson Act contract? Rev 9-29-15 E—K105 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant with Mitigailon Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re -zoning of, () () () (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest () () () (✓) land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest, use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue and is characterized by vacant land to the north, a utility corridor to the west, single-family residential development to the east and multi -family residential development to the south. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 E—K106 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pp 9 Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No ha act Incorporated impact Im act e) The site is located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue and is characterized by vacant land to the north, a utility corridor to the west, single-family residential development to the east and multi -family residential development to the south. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (✓) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () (✓) () ( ) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (✓) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As discussed in subsection b, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 (increase in the frequency or severity of violations of local air quality) or Criterion 2 (exceed assumptions in the AQMP consistency with the 2003 AQMP) pollutants. Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health -based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (S02), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMto), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PMio and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated Rev 9-29-16 E—K107 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Pmantdly Significant With Mitigation Than Significant N. Im act incorporated Impact Im act when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMto), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.e) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (S02), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non -attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non -Attainment Status for Ozone, PMto and PM2,5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality Impact Analysis was prepared by Scientific Resources Associated (January 14, 2016) that utilizes CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long- term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction): Project Emissions and Impacts The project is for the site plan, architectural review and subdivision of a 193-unit, multi- family housing development on 8.8 acres of land that has the potential to add 3,246 square feet of commercial space. The project site is currently undeveloped. The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. Summary of Peak Construction Emissions (Emissions Summary of Overall Construction with Best Available Control Measures) Rev 9-29-15 E—K108 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 less Than Sign'fl_nt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially win, Than Slgnifiwnt Mitigation Significant No Im acl Inw cratad Im act Im acl Table 4 Estimated Construction Emissions Emission Source ROG NOs CO SO, P\Ira P\Irs lhslday Grading Fugitive Dust - - - - 2.48 1.31 Of road Diesel 3.83 40.42 26.67 0.03 2.33 2.14 Worker Travel 0.07 0.09 1.07 0.002 0.17 0.65 TOTAL 390 40.51 27.74 0.03 4.98 3.50 Significance Criteria 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant? cant? No No No No No No pintug Asphalt Offgassing 0.04 - - _ Oti'roadDiesel 232 25.18 14.98 0.02 1.41 1.30 Onroad Diesel 0.09 098 1.08 0.002 0.08 0.03 Worker Travel 0.07 0.09 1.07 0.002 0.17 0.05 TOTAL 2S2 26.25 17.13 0.02 1.66 1.38 Significance Criteria 75 100 550 150 150 55 Si 1ffncaat? No No No No No No Buildin Consyrncdon Building Offioad Diesel 3.66 30.03 18.74 0.03 2.12 1.99 Building Vendor Trips O.27 2.85 3.14 0.006 0.23 0.10 Building Worker Travel 0.74 093 1153 0.02 1.82 0.49 TOTAL 4.67 33.81 33.41 0.06 4.17 2.58 Significance Criteria 75 100 550 150 150 55 59 cant? No No No No No No Archbecoirol C'oaBngs Application Architectural Coatings Off sing 20.97 - Architectural Coatings Offroad Diesel 0.37 237 1.98 0.003 0.20 0.20 Architectural Coatings Worker Travel 0.13 0.17 2.08 0.005 0.36 0.10 Rev 9-29-15 E-K109 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Milignon Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Table 4 Estimated Constniction Emissions Emission Source ROG NOs CO S% PMio PM+,3 lbs/day TOTAL 21.47 2.54 3.96 0.01 0.56 0.30 Significance Criteria 75 100 550 150 150 55 Siri cant? NO No Na .NO No No MAh1MUM SLNIULTANEOUS CONSTRUCTION EiVUSSIONS 25.79 60.05 50.56 0.08 5.83 3.96 Significance Criteria 75 100 550 150 150 55 Si ni rant' NO. No No No NO No Construction activities associated with the project will result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NOx, SOx, PMio and PM2.5 and are expected from the following construction activities: demolition, grading (including soil import), building construction, painting (architectural coatings) paving (curb, gutter, flatwork, and parking lot), and construction worker commuting. Localized Significance Summary (Construction Emissions with Best Available Control Measures Per the Air Quality Impact Analysis performed by Scientific Resources Associated (January 14, 2016), and as shown on Table 5 below, the Construction related LST's are below the related standards. Table 5 LST Analysis Summary— Construction Iin acts Pollutant Averaging Model Background Total Air Quality Above Time Result, Concentration, Impact plus Standard, Standard? ppm or ppm or pg/m3 Background, ppm or ptg/m3 ppm or lig/m3 /m3 CO 1 hour 0.148ppm 3ppm 3.15 ppm 20.0 ppm No CO 8 homs 0.116 ppin 1.76 ppm 1.87 ppm 9.0 ppm No NOZ 1 hour 0.0063 p m 0.052 pp m 0.0S8 m O.1Sp m No Piv1,a. 24 hnllrs 7.74 pgr'm NA NA 10.4 I:Jnr No PM" 24 hours 1 5.20 µ_1m I NA NA 1 10.4 µa m' No A1110 and PM2.5 impacts me evaluated based on exceedance of an incremental impact of 10.4 Ito'm : therefore, backmound concerm ations are not added to the impact. Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on -site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction Rev 9-29-15 E—K110 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially significant with Mitigation Than significant No Im act incorporated Impact Inninact activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions; however, as shown in the table above, the amount will not exceed any threshold of significance. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut -and -fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project -by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCS and are part of the Os precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 21.47 Ibs of VOC per day during construction. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 Ibslday. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on -site and existing off -site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following Best Available Control Measures (BACM) identified in the Air Quality Impact Analysis performed by Scientific Resources Associated (January 14, 2016) as mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less -than -significant: 1) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. Rev 9-29-15 E—K111 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Than significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Peieniially Significant With Miligafon Than Signifcanl No Impact Incarporatetl Impact Impact 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts: Short -Term Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on -site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on -going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PMio) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less -than -significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short-term air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. Rev 9-29-15 E—K112 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant Na Impact incorporated Im act Im act 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. 10) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 11) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 12) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMig emissions. Project Long Term (Operational) Emissions and Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project -related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area; therefore, the proposed project would Rev 9-29-15 E—K113 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Lass Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potemnfy SigNficanl wann maigaf man $gmficant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact result In net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on -site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. Per the Air Quality Impact Analysis performed by Scientific Resources Associated (January 14, 2016), SCAQMD's LST Methodology, only on -site emissions should be evaluated versus the significance thresholds. Because on -site emissions are low, the emissions would not exceed the ambient air quality standards. As shown in Tables 6 and 7 below, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project. Summary of Peak Operational Emissions Table 6 Estimated Operational Emissions Emission Source ROG NOs I CO SO, P\Iro P11Izs Summer, Ibslday Area Sources 6.14 0.19 16.31 0.00 0.09 0.09 Use 0-06 051 0.22 0.00 0.04 0.04 -Energy Vehicular Emissions 6-63 18.15 75.52 0.15 10.14 2.90 12.83 1&96 92.05 0.15 10.27 3.02 -TOTAL Criteria 55 55 550 150 150 55 -Significance Signtocant? No No No No No No winter, lhs/da Area Sources 6.14 0.19 16.31 0.00 &09 0.09 Use 0.06 0.51 0 22 0.00 0.04 0.04 -Energy Vehicular Emissions 6.90 1911 74 25 0.14 10.15 2.90 TOTAL 13.10 19M 90.78 0.14 10.27 3.03 Si cane Criteria 55 55 550 150 150 55 Stgnificant7 No No No No No No Table 7 LSTAnaMilsiSummary -O erationalIm act5 Pollutant Averaging Model Background Total Air Quality Above Time Result, Concentration, Impact plus Standard, Standard? ppm or ppm or pgim3 Background, ppm or pg/m3 ppm or pg/m3 (m3 CO 1 hour 0.00161ppm 3 ppm 3.00161ppm 20.0 ppm No CO 8 hours 0,00126 ppm 1.76 ppm 1.76126 ppm 9.0 ppm No NO' 1 hour U0002pe 0.092 ppm 1 0.082002 Pima 1 0." m No PMm 24 hours 0.070 ppm NA NA 10.4 µgE No P112 5. 1 24 hours 0.070 pglW NA NA 10.4 m No PM10 and PAL'-5 impacts are evaluated based on esccedance of an incremental impact of 10.4 pgtm : therefore. backgromut concentrations are not added to de impact. Rev 9-29-15 E-K114 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Than Signif cant Less Issues and Supporting Information S PP g Sources: Potentially Signifmant With Mltigalion Than Signifcanl No Im aq incorporated Impact Im act Cumulative Impacts (Long Term/Operational Emissions) The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the potential impacts to air quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, continued development would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, all developments would be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to aless-than-significant level. This City-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 13) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 15) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 16) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 19) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 20) All commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 21) All commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 22) All commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 23) All commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 24) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low- polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. Rev 9-29-15 E—K115 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pp g Patemlany Significant with Mitigation man Significant No Im act Incar oratetl Impact Im act 25) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR, which are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within''/a mile of Garcia Park. During construction, diesel equipment operation at the site may generate some toxic air contaminant JAC) emissions. These emissions would be short-term and temporary and would not result in exposure of sensitive receptor to substantial pollutant concentrations. The residential use proposed for the project would not be sources of TACs. Per the Air Quality Impact Analysis performed by Scientific Resources Associated (January 14, 2016), projects involving traffic impacts may result in the formation of locally high concentrations of CO, known as CO "hotspots." Due to the size of the project, no CO "hotspots" are anticipated. The project's impacts would therefore be less than significant. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less -than -significant levels. 26) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.e and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational odors (Long-term) are not typically associated with the proposed type of use. Odors from the proposed residential and commercial use would most likely be from activities such as food preparation, however, these odors would be minimal and not considered to be significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 E—K116 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () V) () ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () (✓) () ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with residential uses. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding development. According to General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources. A Biological Survey (Debra Kisinger; May, 2009 and updated on December 19, 2014) was prepared for the project which determined that the project site is dominated by non-native grasses and eucalyptus trees that were planted when the project site was used as a wood lot. The Biological survey includes a table (Table 2 — Page 12) outlining the potentially occurring sensitive species on the project site. Per this table, no sensitive plants reptiles or mammals were observed on the project site. The only sensitive bird observed on site was a prairie falcon. The Biological Survey finds that the project will potentially impact State and Federal Species of Special Concern including the California horned lark, San Diego pocket mouse and coastal horned lizard if they are present when the project site is graded. These species were not observed on the site and the project will have a less than significant impact on these species as it would not remove significant population centers or Rev 9-29-15 E—K117 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Than Significant[S,19 7rt Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potenuslly Significant with Mitigation Impact Inco cratedIm act populations near the extent of their range and high quality habitat does not exist on the project site. Additionally, impacts to the California horned lark, northwest San Diego pocket mouse and coastal horned lizard will be less than significant because the project site would not remove significant population centers or populations near the extent of their range. High quality habitat does not exist on the project site and would not be impacted by the proposed project, therefore impact to these species is considered less than significant. The report finds that while burrowing owls were not observed on the project site, they have been documented in the surrounding area and there is suitable habitat on site. A prairie falcon was observed on the high tension power lines adjacent to the project site and the project site may be suitable foraging habitat. Impacts to this species and other nesting birds may occur if the trees on the project are removed during the nesting season. The Biological Survey recommends that a nesting bird survey be performed prior to grading. Staff has also added a mitigation measure requiring a burrowing owl survey prior to grading to verify that they have not inhabited the project site. The Biological Survey concludes that as long as potential impacts to raptors and migratory birds are avoided and mitigated as recommended, the impacts will be below the threshold of significance for sensitive species and tier habitats and the project will have a less than significant impact on the environment: 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 2) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys Staff Report. Results of the pre -construction CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction be based on Appendix D and Reports) of the CDFW survey shall be provided to survey does not identify Rev 9-29-15 E—K118 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incor anted Impact Im act burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre - construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground - disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 3) Provide a fire exclusion wall around the project site, subject to approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the local fire department to avoid accidental ignitions on highly flammable grasslands adjacent to the project site. 4) Should any future improvements be required outside of the project footprint and parcel boundaries, they should be subject to environmental review. 5) Prevent ponding of water during construction and eliminate access to open water sources during construction that would attract sensitive species. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on -site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) No wetland habitat is present on -site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are heritage trees on the project site. An Arborist Report (Kisinger Environmental Consulting - December 17, 2014) was submitted for the project. The project site was previously used as a woodlot and contains approximately 184 remnant eucalyptus trees planted in evenly spaced rows. The on -site eucalyptus trees were not planted for the Rev 9-29-15 E—K119 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than Significant less Issues and Supporting Information S PP g ormaSources: Potentially Significant WA Mitigation Than Signifcant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact purposes of a wind break. Development Code Section 17.38.060 (H) (8) places restrictions on the removal of the on -site eucalyptus trees. It has been determined that the on -site eucalyptus trees are in poor condition due to pest infestation, lack of care and maintenance and other observed structural deficiencies. The trees have been determined to be poor candidates for integration into the project landscape design. The project includes a Development Code Amendment (DRC2014-01132) eliminating Sectionl7.38.060 (H) (8) from the Development Code and therefore protection of the subject trees. Development Code Section 17.80.040 (Tree Replacement Policy) requires that heritage trees be replaced with a size and quantity determined by the Planning Director or Planning Commission. The Arborist Report recommends planting 52 eucalyptus trees and 36 date palms in a configuration recommended by the landscape architect. The Landscape Plan submitted for the project includes the planting of 52 eucalyptus trees spaced 11 feet on center along the north and west property lines and the 36 date palms planted throughout the project site. Due to the poor condition of the trees, as outlined above, all 184 existing remnant eucalyptus trees are recommended for removal. The landscape plan includes a total of 267 new trees to be planted on the project site, including the 88 trees recommended for replacement in the arborist report. With the planting of the recommended trees, approval of the related Development Code Amendment removing protection of the existing on -site eucalyptus trees and the planting of the additional trees outlined in the Landscape Plan, the proposed project will not be in conflict with any local ordinance. With the following mitigation measure the project will have a less than significant impact on the environment: 6) Plant 52 peppermint gum, E. nicholii spaced 11 feet on center along the north and west property lines and 36 date palms as recommend by the landscape architect. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (✓) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) () () (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? e) Directly or indirectly affect a Native American tribal () (✓) () ( ) cultural resource? Rev 9-29-15 E—K120 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PatennanY wn Than Signlficanl t✓u'Gganon Significant No Im act Incar orated Impact Im act Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). A Cultural Resources Survey Report (Laguna Mountain Environmental, Inc., May, 2015) was submitted for the project site. The cultural resources survey identified the remains of a past historic -age structure and planted wood lot within the project area. Both of these resources lack integrity and do not qualify as eligible for California Reister. Impacts to cultural resources eligible for the California Register and significant under CEQA will not occur. No impacts to cultural resources will result from the project. No further work is recommended to address cultural resource issues. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: c) 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or Rev 9-29-15 E—K121 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pp 9 Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Slgnificanl No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere -of - Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by the construction of infrastructure and surrounding development. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on -site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on -site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) In accordance with AB52, the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians were contacted to determine interest in engaging in consultation related to the potential impact to cultural resources as result of the project. The City was contacted by a third tribe (email dated February 6, 2015), the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians, who requested that one of their experienced and certified Native American monitors be on site during any and all ground disturbances. Staff was also contacted by the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians (October 28, 2015) and the San Manuel Band of Rev 9-29-15 E—K122 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Than Signifcant Less Issues and Supporting Information S PP g Sources: Potentially Signifcant with Mitigation Than significant No Impact Incarporaod Impact Impact Mission Indians (October 1, 2015), neither of which requested consultation. As noted in section "a" above, a Cultural Resources Survey Report (Laguna Mountain Environmental, Inc., May, 2015) was submitted for the project site that concluded that no impacts would occur to cultural resources related to earth moving activities during the construction of the project. With the following mitigation measure, impacts to cultural resources will be less than significant. 3) A Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians certified Native American shall be onsite during any and all ground disturbances. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (✓) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including () () () (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (✓) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 2-1/4 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3 miles north These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 11 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, I:%P�II��'31F7 E—K123 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pmenuaoy Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im aol is 16 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less -than -significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on -site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMto emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off - site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMto emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SO] for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on -site consist of Tujunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on -site consist of Tujunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR (Exhibit 4.7-3). These soils are typically considered rapidly permeable with slow to very slow runoff and slight erosion hazard. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. Rev 9-29-15 E—K124 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Than Significant. Less. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polemianv Signifcanl With MiligaYen Si gnifcant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project. a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or () (✓) () ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation () () (✓) ( ) adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Comments: a) Regulations and Significance — The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act (92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas (GHG) emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines 6 key GHGs (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SFe)). The combined emissions of these well -mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in -State and out -of -State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures Rev 9-29-15 E—K125 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 I°oteptiany Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PMio, PM2S, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PMio, and PM2.e levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions. However, a screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is based upon South Coast Air Quality Management District staff's proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary sources emissions for non -industrial projects, as described in the SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Scientific Resources Associated; November, 2014), total project related emissions would be 2,154 MTCO2eq/year, as shown on Table 6 below: Rev 9-29-15 E—K126 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact GHG Emissions Table: Table 6 GHG Emissions Emission Source Emissions metric tons per year) CO2 CH4 N20 Total CO2c Annual construction -related emissions amortized over 30 ears 33.75 0.0057 0.0000 33.87 Area 3.25 0.0035 0.0000 3.32 Energy 108.10 0.0021 0.0020 108.75 Mobile Sources 1,983.42 0.0922 1 0.0000 1,985.36 Waste 4.68 0.2765 0.0000 10.48 Water Usage 3.25 0.3341 0.0079 12.71 Total CO2e (All Sources) 2,154.49 As shown in the above table, direct and indirect operational emissions associated with the project as compared to the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance of 3,000 MTCO2e per year would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions — The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel -powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off -site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil - based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cho, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Scientific Resources Associated; November, 2014), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term construction impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. Rev 9-29-15 E—K127 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Im act 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term ,(Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off -site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project involves the development of a 193-unit, multi -family residential development on 8.8 acres of land. The project includes a 3,246 square foot area that can be converted from the proposed residential use (3, one bedroom units) to leasable commercial tenant space in the future. The project, therefore, would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Scientific Resources Associated; November, 2014), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed Rev 9-29-15 E—K128 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incorporated Im act Im act project would have less than a significant long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Rev 9-29-15 E—K129 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pp 9 Potentially Significant wtn Mitiga5on Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The project involves the development of a 193-unit, multi -family residential development on 8.8 acres of land. The project includes a 3,246 square foot area that can be converted from the proposed residential use (3, one bedroom units) to leasable commercial tenant space in the future, which is consistent with the General Plan. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re -use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the sustainability and climate change policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant, unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Scientific Resources Associated; November, 2014), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term, construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to GHGs from short-term construction and long-term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) () () (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Rev 9-29-15 E—K130 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 30 Less Than Slgnifl can Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact IncoryoraleI Impact Im act e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located within 1/3 mile of the nearest school (Perdew Elementary School). The project will be required to comply with existing State and Federal standards on the use and transport of hazardous materials. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 E—K131 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 31 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Signifcant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 and 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways, The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind -driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. No impact is anticipated. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (✓) () ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () (✓) () ( ) Rev 9-29-15 E—K132 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 32 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Inco oratetl Impact Im act g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Rev 9-29-15 Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off -site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP exhibit by Madole and Associates, Inc. dated December 22, 2014, which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on -site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to E—K133 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 33 Less Than Signiflcanl Less Issues and Supporting Information S PP gormaSources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational: Rev 9-29-15 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for E—K134 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 34 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially significant With Mitigalion Than Signifcant No Impact Incorporated Im act Im act New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off -site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off -site. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 E—K135 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a), less than significant impacts are anticipated. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Exhibit prepared by Madole and Associates, Inc. on December 22, 2014, to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete -lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non -significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) () () (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue and is characterized by vacant land to the north, a utility corridor to the west, single-family residential development to the east and multi -family residential development to the south. Rev 9-29-15 E—K136 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 36 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially significant wit' MiOgalion Thai Signifcant No Impact Incorporated Im act Impact This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to south. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Mixed Use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The project will require the approval of a Zoning Map Amendment to bring the project into conformance with the General Plan. This change will not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (✓) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () (✓) () ( ) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (✓) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? :8IItkai6l E—K137 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 37 Less Than Signifcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Signifcant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incor orated Impact im act e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build -out. An Acoustical Analysis Report (Kinsinger Environmental Consulting — December 11, 2014 and revised on January 25, 2016) was prepared for the project to review these noise impacts and to determine whether mitigation measures are required. The report determined that with the following mitigation measures, elevated noise levels created by the adjacent roadways will be reduced to less than significant: Rev 9-29-15 Exterior: 1) The developer shall construct noise barriers around patios and balconies located along the east side of Building 1, along the south side and southeast corner of Building 4, and along the entire south and second and third floors of the east side of Building 5. The barrier walls shall be 4 feet in height at first floor receivers and 3.5 feet in height at second and third floor receivers, and shall meet the minimum design standards detailed within the Acoustical Analysis Report (Kinsinger Environmental Consulting — December 11, 2014 and revised on January 25, 2016). 2) The developer shall have an exterior -to -interior noise analysis performed by an acoustical consultant when building plans become available, prior to the issuance of building permits, in order to demonstrate that residential units on site will have interior noise levels that meet the noise standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga by detailing appropriate project design features for meeting such standards. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 4) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 p.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 p.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. E—K138 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 38 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorparated Impact Impact Interior., 5) See mitigation measure 2 above related to providing acoustical analysis at time of building plan check to demonstrate that the residential units will have interior noise levels that meet City of Rancho Cucamonga noise standards. b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce operational ground borne vibrations. Construction related vibration may create short term noise and vibration impacts that will be limited in nature. The nearest adjacent residential dwelling is approximately 150 south of the project site and is separated from the project site by a public street. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. With the Mitigation Measures outlined in Section A above, the elevated noise levels created by the adjacent roadways will be reduced to less than significant: d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on -site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on -site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction Rev 9-29-15 E—K139 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 39 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will include the construction of 193 multiple -family residences. Although the project will increase the population growth in the area there will be a less than significant impact as the project is limited in size and is surrounded by residential development. The existing infrastructure has the capacity to accommodate the increased demand. No significant impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is vacant and therefore will not displace of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. c) The project site is vacant. Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () (✓) b) Police protection? () () () (✓) c) Schools? () () () (✓) Rev 9-29-15 E—K140 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 40 Less Than Signifcant Less and Supporting Information Sources: a Significant With Mitigation Than Sgnifcanl No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Parks? O O O (✓) e) Other public facilities? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The site, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue, would be served by Day Creek Fire Station #173 at 12270 Firehouse Court, which is approximately 2 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) The increase in residential units may lead to an increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Garcia Park is located 112 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. Rev 9-29-15 E—K141 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 41 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incor orated Im act Impact 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) () ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or () () () (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Garcia Park, is located Yz mile from the project site. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) () () (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management () () () (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Rev 9-29-15 E—K142 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 42 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wuh Than significant Mitigation Si gnifcant No Im act Incorporatetl Im act Im act Comments: a) The project will generate 1,391 daily trips with 102 trips occurring during the a.m. peak hour and 124 trips occurring during the p.m. peak hour, per the Traffic Study submitted for the project (LSA; August, 2015). Under all existing and opening year scenarios, all intersections operate at satisfactory LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Under year 2035 scenarios, all intersections operate at satisfactory LOS with the exception of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard, which operates at LOS E in the p.m. peak hour. The level of service deficiency occurs in the without project conditions and is not created by the project. The City Engineer reviewed the traffic study submitted for the project (LSA; August, 2015) and concurs with the report's findings. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The design of the project includes features supporting. public transportation and vehicle trip reduction including the construction of a bus shelter adjacent to the project site and bicycle storage areas. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 E—K143 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 43 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. Rev 9-29-15 E—K144 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 44 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potemially with rnan Signiricant Utigallon Signifwnl No Impact Incorporated Im act Im act d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal, needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () (✓) () ( ) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () (✓) () ( ) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. A Biological Survey (Debra Kisinger; May, 2009 and updated on December 19, 2014) was prepared for the project. The Biological Survey determined that the project site is dominated by non-native grasses and eucalyptus trees that were planted when the project site was used as a wood lot. The report concluded that as long as potential impacts to raptors and migratory birds are avoided and mitigated as recommended (see Biological Resources section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures), the impacts will be below the threshold of significance for sensitive species and their habitats and the project will have a less than significant impact on the environment. Rev 9-29-15 E—K145 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga (SUBTT19945) Page 45 b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build -out in the City and Sphere -of -Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed -use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction -related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact and includes mitigation measures to reduce emission levels to a less than significant impact on the environment (see Air Quality section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures). Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short- term and would cease once construction activities were completed. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality Impact Analysis was prepared by Scientific Resources Associated (January 14, 2016). This analysis concluded that because the on -site emissions are low, the emissions would not exceed the ambient air quality standards prescribed by the SCAQMD. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. An Acoustical Analysis (Kinsinger Environmental Consulting — December 11, 2014 and revised on January 25, 2016) was submitted for the project that reviewed the potential interior and exterior noise levels. The report concluded that with the proposed mitigation measures (see Noise section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures), elevated interior and exterior noise levels created by the adjacent roadways would be reduced to less than significant. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FOR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) Rev 9-29-16 E—K146 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga (SUBTT19945) Page 46 (T) Acoustical Analysis Report (Kinsinger Environmental Consulting — December 11, 2014 and revised on January 25, 2016) (T) Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment (Scientific Resources Associated) — January 2016) (T) Arborist Report (Kinsinger Environmental Consulting — December 17, 2014) (T) Biological Report (Kinsinger Environmental Consulting — December 19, 2014) (T) Cultural Resources Survey Report (Kinsinger Environmental Consulting — May, 2015) (T) Traffic Study (LSA — August 18, 2015) Rev 9-29-15 E—K147 Initial Study for (SUBM 9945) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I cenay that I am the app'icant fcr the read this Inrha. Study and the propose( proposals and'o' hereby agre to the effects to a po nt where clearjyno sign Applicant s Print Name and T it& Rev 3-1-16 r,, City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 47 described to tlis [nit at Study. I acknow edge that I have measures Further. I have revised the project pans or J r jiigal.on measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the ,,- measures effects vrould occur. Dalo --�/2( /IL- E—K148 RESOLUTION NO. 16-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-01132, A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CODE TABLE 17.36.020-2 (DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS) TO CLARIFY PERMITTED USES IN THE MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS AND ALLOWING TRANSIT ORIENTATED DEVELOPMENTS (TOD) WITHIN '/ MILE OF A TRANSIT STOP AND TO AMEND SECTION 17.36.020 A AND B, FIGURE 17.36.020-1 AND TABLE 17.36.020-1, TO ADD THE PROPOSED SITE TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS TABLES, FIGURES AND TEXT AND FIGURES 17.38.060-1 AND 17.38.060-15, TO CHANGE THE PROJECT SITE FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE PROPOSED ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-01131 AMENDING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF THE SITE FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) TO MIXED USE (MU)) FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PROPOSED 193-UNIT, MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR 3,246 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE TO SUPPORT FUTURE MASS TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES FOR A SITE LOCATED ON 8.8 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) ZONING DISTRICT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN'S: 1100-201-03, 04 AND 07. A. Recitals. 1. Foothill and East, LLC filed an application for the approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of April 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to May 11, 2016. 3. On the 11th day of May 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearings of April 27, 2016 and continued to May 11, 2016, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site is made up of three (3) parcels totaling 8.8 gross acres of land located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; and E—K149 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-24 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-01132 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 2 b. The site is vacant with a water pumping facility operated by the Cucamonga Valley Water District near the northwest corner of the project site and a grove of Eucalyptus trees that were planted prior to 1938 and were historically used as a wood lot; and C. The site is bounded by vacant land to the north in the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district; by a multi -family development to the south in the Medium (M) Development District; by a flood control facility and single-family residences in the City of Fontana to the east; and, by utility easements to the west in the Open Space (OP) District; and d. The Development Code Amendment is related to a proposed 190-unit, mixed use development with 3,246 square feet of commercial space on a site located on 8.8 acres of land within the Community Commercial (CC) Zoning District at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; and e. A Development Code Amendment (DRC2014-01132) to: a) clarify permitted uses in the Mixed Use Zoning Districts by amending Development Code Table 17.36.020-2 (Development Standards for Mixed Use Zoning Districts) by adding 2 separate footnotes clarifying the permitted uses within the Mixed Use Districts and b) modify the facts, figures and tables in Development Code Section 17.36.020, to add the project site as Mixed Use area #14 to the current 13 Mixed Use areas and modify Figures 17.38.060-1 and 17.38.060-15, to change the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed Use (Subarea 4 Map); and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. The Amendment will permit parcels of less than 5 acres within mixed use areas to consider a mix of residential types as meeting the Development Code requirement of providing a two uses. This change will promote General Plan Policy LU-3.7, to encourage new development projects to build on vacant infill sites within a built -out areas. It will also exempt Transit Oriented Developments (TOD) within'/ mile of a transit stop from having to provide a mix of land uses within Mixed Use zoning areas. This change supports General Plan Policy LU-2.1, to develop high density residential areas at strategic infill locations along transit routes; and b. This Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code. The Amendment will permit higher density residential developments within Mixed Use (MU) zoning districts to be developed on parcels of less than 5 acres by providing a mix of residential building types and for Transit oriented Developments located adjacent to transit stops to not provide a mix of land uses. The subsequent developments related to the Amendment will be required to meet the related development and design standards outlined in the Development Code and promote the orderly development of the City; and C. The proposed Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Amendment will encourage the development of higher density residential projects on smaller parcels of land and adjacent to transit stops. The subsequent projects related to the Amendment will be reviewed on a case by case basis for E—K150 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-24 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-01132 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 3 conformity with the design criteria of the Development Code and will be complimentary to the surrounding development. Mixed use projects will require approval by the Design Review Committee and will be of the same high quality design as the surrounding development and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code. The Development Code has a stated objective to protect the physical, social, and economic stability of residential, commercial, industrial and other land uses within the City to assure its orderly and beneficial development. The Amendment will promote the development of higher density residential project on smaller parcels of land and adjacent to transit stops, which will encourage the orderly development of the City; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The amendment will encourage the development of higher density residential developments on smaller parcels of land and adjacent to transit stops, which will promote General Plan Policy LU-3.4, to create sustainable development in it use of land and that limits impact to natural resources, energy and air and water quality. The resulting higher density projects adjacent to transit stops will decrease vehicle miles travels, water use and limit negative impacts to air quality. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to approving the subject Development Code Amendment. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents E—K151 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-24 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-01132 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 4 are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends City Council approval of the application deleting Development Code Section 17.38.060(H)(8) as shown in Attachments A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) Approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132 includes the following changes: a. Amend Development Code Table 17.36.020-2 to add a footnote stating that "on project sites of 5 acres (net) or less, two or more housing types/product, such as detached and attached SFR; SFR and MFR; combinations of SFR, townhome, condominiums, and apartments; etc., shall satisfy the requirement for providing a combination of two or more uses," b. Amend Development Code Table 17.36.020-2 to add a footnote stating that "subject to Planning Commission Review and Approval, Transit Oriented Developments within '/ mile of a transit stop are exempt from meeting the minimum two land use requirement." c. Amend Development Code Section 17.36.020 A and B, Figure 17.36.020-1 and Table 17.36.020-1, to add the project site to the Development Standards for Mixed Use Zoning Districts and Figure 17.38.060-1 and 17.38.060-15, to change the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed Use, related to the proposed Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-01131), amending the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). 2) The approval of DRC2014-01132 is subject to final approval by the City Council and final approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-01131, to change land use designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). 3) Approval is contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. E—K152 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-24 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-01132 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 5 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MIN Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of May 2016, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E—K153 "Attachment A" Section 17.36.020 A of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follow with changes highlighted: A. Purpose and Applicability. The purpose of this Section is to establish minimum development standards that are unique to development projects within the City's Mixed Use Zoning District. The General Plan establishes fourteen (14) mixed use sites throughout the city with the intent to create special urban places with horizontal and/or vertical integration of uses. In the General Plan, each mixed use site includes intent statements, land use ranges, and corresponding development assumptions. Development standards in this Section apply to all land designated on the Zoning Map within a Mixed Use District and are intended to be consistent with and implement the General Plan. See Figure 17.36.020-1 (Mixed Use Sites). Attachment A E—K154 "Attachment B" Table 17.36.020-1 of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows with change highlighted: TABLE 17.36.020-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE SITES Land Use Mix >. �N C � •N Mixed Use Sites 2 ° 6 'a v E iE E o o M a `m U a. a Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors 21-36% 20-41 % 5-12% 4-14 Town Center (Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue) 25-35% 10-15% 30-50% 0-10% 14 du/ac Terra Vista 12-15% 85-87% 30 du/ac Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue 0-62% 0-100% 20 du/ac Foothill Boulevard between Archibald 67-70% 30-33% 15-30 Avenue and Hellman Avenue du/ac Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street 30-40% 60-70% 30 du/ac Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue 26-50% 40-60% 6-10% 4% d�/ac Industrial Area Specific Plan 11-22% 15-25% 40-60% 7.5% 28 du/ac Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel 70-75% 25-30% 14 du/ac Haven Avenue and Church Street Site 0-100% 0-100% 8-14 Western Gateway (Bear Gulch Area) 30-50% 50-70% 14 du/ac Foothill Boulevard and Cucamonga 8-14 Channel Site 0-100% 0-100% du/ac Historic Alta Loma (Amethyst Site) 0-100% 0-100% 14-24 du/ac N!/C Foothlll!Bouleva[d_and East Avenue 0 10% 0 `100°W 14=24 _ _ - du/ac Table Notes: (1) This table only applies to existing Mixed Use sites. Attachment B E-K155 "Attachment C" Table 17.36.020-2 of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows with changes highlighted: Attachment C E—K156 Table 17.36.020-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard MU Site/Lot Area (minimum) I') n/a Lot Width/Depth (minimum) n/a Allowed Density (dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density n/a Maximum Density 50 units/acre Land Use Mix I2$8)(9) Project shall incorporate a minimum of two of the following types of land uses: Commercial, Office, Institutional, Residential, LiveNVork Setbacks (3))4) Street Yard (Major/Special Boulevard) 50% - 75% reduction of streetscape requirements (7) Street Yard (Secondary/Collector) 50% - 75% reduction of streetscape requirements(') Street Yard (Local Streets) 75% - 100% reduction of streetscape requirements(') Rear Yard (adjacent to residential) Match rear yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Rear Yard (adjacent to commercial or industrial) 0 feet (5) Interior Side (adjacent to residential) Match side yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Interior Side (adjacent to commercial or industrial) 5 feet Distance Between Buildings Primary Buildings Minimum per Building Code requirements Accessory Buildings Building Height (maximum in feet) )6) Primary Buildings 75 feet maximum Accessory Buildings Not to exceed primary building height Floor Area Ratio (maximum ratio of building to lot square footage) Floor Area Ratio 1.0 max Open Space Requirement (minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Landscape Area (overall net area) 10% minimum Open Space Requirements Minimum of 150 square feet/unit See Section 17.36.020 (D) for additional requirements Recreation Area/Facility Required per Section 17.36.010 (E) Parking Requirement Parking Spaces See Table 17.64.050-1 NOTE: A parking study is required for all Mixed Use projects per Section 17.64.060(D) E—K157 Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record, parcels less than three (3) acres orless than the required minimum frontage may onlybe developed at the lowest end of the. permitted density range. (2) Lot sizes less than one-half (M) acre are not subject to land use mix requirement. (3) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (4) Shall apply to buildings, parking and landscaping. (5) Must meet minimum Building Codes. (6) Ali buildings within one -hundred (100) feet of LM, L, or VL Districts shall not exceed twenty five feet (25); however, there may be areas where the maximum building height may be required to be less than the cited maximum, and shall be determined on a case by case basis. (7) For mixed use development of any type see the streetscape setbacks in Table 17.36.010-3 that apply to Attached Single - Family Residential and MultiFamily Residential. (6) On pro/ecLsites of five acres (net) oc.=less lwo or ffi6rei housing types%product such asdeta'ched and.atfadhed SF.Rr.SFR and (9) Sub/ect to'Ptannin Commission approval Transit Ononted !)eyeloprnents'within Y mile of a transit stop are exempt fom E—K158 "Attachment D" Figure 17.36.020-1 of the Development Code is hereby deleted and replaced as follows: Attachment FIGURE 17.36.020-1 MIXED USE SITES E—K159 "Attachment E" Section 17.36.020 B of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows with changes highlighted: B. Mixed Use Sites. The fourteen Q1,4) mixed use sites with Mixed Use Zoning District designations are listed below. 1. Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors 2. Town Center (Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue) 3. Terra Vista 4. Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue 5. Foothill Boulevard between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue 6. Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street 7. Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue 8. Industrial Area Specific Plan (Sub -Area 18) 9. Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel 10. Haven Avenue and Church Street Site 11. Western Gateway (Bear Gulch Area) 12. Foothill Boulevard and Cucamonga Channel Site 13. Historic Alta Loma (Amethyst Site) _NAP Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue Attachment E E—K160 i ➢1 rh 0 3 CD rl MT IM "At ment F" Figure 17.36.020-1 ;UBAREA 2 SUBAREA 4 1 1 1 % Ivc.nr r.... var. l`4^n.n cM.. mover Legend -- Cay Lunde Specific Plans H..vy(Hq Fw;mll Blvd Speahc Na, BPuMary Etlwvga.feM SpevM1c Plan Kflmde Reside. ia!(HRI Overlay 1 Fhwarlda 5,.1. Pt.. IrCuF!r!al Park IIP• Camrnetoel M,<M UV Owns: I_:-�I EmPee Lakes Sprwhc Part Loa Rea "M(LI .. :: Frfvextnan OvaMv Zoning Low -Me m Res!dential lLMl Faa!NII Ba!levnm S e Aa Plen -General Commercial IGC! Medium Resid mn {W .....:; H.. Avcnw Oven., Camrraaiify Canmerpol(cc; wr ikletlium!!gF fteardenNal(MlIt Hi lsa Ovaday Per Ord G2a :. ?"hhwhwal Cameama! (NC! !mpacf Hewvv lnduaY Senor Housma Overlay Ream" Related Camrnarnel (RRC) ';'(�' ,APod Use (IdU! Community Plans EMCWly CMNne Iwc) oeen Sp.(OS) --': C.,n R.•v d Cwim ,!, ' CommarclsVO!faa iC'JI PLL Cmnmundy (PCI - -: Ftwende H!gWW. Man.d Ca mmm, _ O -C. Profesagnel !OP} - Scrt lsl -� Tmro Vr Ptarvwad cam.mnty Float Co.t W (FCI Specllk Ph (SR) Vlrtarn planned Commv" M General mv,wal IGl) _ uwy C: (,W. aic, H Ra 0.,a W MI Very Law Remdnnllw M) I- Lf a "Attachment G" Figure 17.38.060-1 Foothill Boulevard Subareas SUBAREA SUBAREA r or, X L SUBAREA SUBAREA Legend — C:4y -Mq% M - OC C3 FWM swmysl �PmTa qsowar, M CvrVffaso-,C.:�, ZM" M %ftea Lob* tmu O %" U 0 Rw 0 V T3 Z] r1suma Plxk fp LLW4W*(%M azwMVW r-U: ZZ MftT IM03M MR=CMMfFC: FEE' M sawfftow fsm vic :,Z I 19 1 r4 I 191 joqljr:} [,-0 4JUN M"j L- Awl p;1,AA"4oAq Im, UO �j 1,�npl, Cp., 14 deA t7 eajeqnS ST-090,8E*/T ajn2i3 ,H luau av" DAN evoo4or rn W RESOLUTION NO. 16-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-01131, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FOR 8.8 ACRES OF LAND FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) TO MIXED USE (MU) RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 190-UNIT, MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR 3,246 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE TO SUPPORT FUTURE MASS TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES ON A PROJECT SITE WITHIN THE MIXED USE (MU) ZONING DISTRICT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN'S: 1100-201-03, 04 AND 07. A. Recitals. 1. Foothill and East, LLC filed an application for the approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-01131, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Zoning Map Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of April 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to May 11, 2016. 3. On the 11th day of May 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearings of April 27, 2016 and continued to May 11, 2016, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site is made up of three (3) parcels totaling 8.8 gross acres of land located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; and b. The site is vacant with a water pumping facility operated by the Cucamonga Valley Water District near the northwest corner of the project site and a grove of Eucalyptus trees that were planted prior to 1938 and were historically used as a wood lot; and C. The site is bounded by vacant land to the north in the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district; by a multi -family development to the south in the Medium (M) Development District; by a flood control facility and single-family residences in the City of Fontana to the east; and, by utility easements to the west in the Open Space (OP) District; and E—K164 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-25 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-01131 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 2 d. The development consists of 190 units including 69 one bedroom units (769 - 774 square feet), 107 two bedroom units (1,068 — 1,322 square feet), 14 three bedroom units (1,352 square feet) and 3,246 square feet of commercial tenant space; and e. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-01131) changes the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). The proposed Zoning Map Amendment will bring the project site into conformance with the General Plan. f. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Mixed Use (MU). The General Plan has a stated policy (Policy LU-4.1) to provide new mixed use development opportunities along the Foothill Boulevard corridor to allow residential, commercial and civic uses, and to accommodate both transit and automobiles. The proposed project is located adjacent to a transit stop and provides the opportunity for a potential mixed use development; and g. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. The Zoning Map Amendment will bring the zoning designation for the project site into conformance with the General plan land use designation; and h. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The proposed project is similar in design and use to the adjacent project to the south and will not be materially injurious or have a significant impact on the environment to the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. The subject property is located at the corner of two major streets and provides adequate vehicle and pedestrian access on both street frontages. The project is compatible with the existing development in the area, including the multi -family develop to the south of the project site; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The Initial Study Part II prepared for the project outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less -than -significant; and C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The subject Zoning Map Amendment changes the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU), in conformance with the General Plan Mixed Use (MU) land use designation. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: E—K165 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-25 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-01131 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 3 a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to approving the subject Zoning Map Amendment. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends City Council approval of the subject Zoning Map Amendment as shown in Attachment A subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planninq Department 1) Approval is to change the zoning designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU) for an 8.8 acre parcel of land related to the development of a 190-unit mixed use development with 3,246 square feet of commercial space located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; APN's: 1100-201-03, 04 and 07. 2) The approval of DRC2014-01131 is subject to final approval by the City Council and final approval by the City Council of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132. 3) Approval is contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. E—K166 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-25 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-01131 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 4 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA go ATTEST: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of May 2016, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E—K167 c m c 0 LL .. . O U 0 RESOLUTION NO. 16-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19945, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 8.8 ACRES OF LAND FOR COMMERICAL AND RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 190-UNIT, MULTI -FAMILY MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR 3,246 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE TO SUPPORT FUTURE MASS TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES ON A PROJECT SITE OF WITHIN THE MIXED USE (MU) ZONING DISTRICT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN'S: 1100-201-03, 04AND 07. A. Recitals. 1. Foothill and East, LLC filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of April 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted.a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to May 11, 2016. 3. On the 11th day of May 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearings of April 27, 2016 and continued to May 11, 2016, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site is made up of three (3) parcels totaling 8.8 gross acres of land located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; and b. The site is vacant with a water pumping facility operated by the Cucamonga Valley Water District near the northwest corner of the project site and a grove of Eucalyptus trees that were planted prior to 1938 and were historically used as a wood lot; and C. The site is bounded by vacant land to the north in the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district; by a multi -family development to the south in the Medium (M) Development District; by a flood control facility and single-family residences in the City of Fontana to the east; and, by utility easements to the west in the Open Space (OP) District; and d. The applicant proposes the subdivision of air space of 8.8 acres of land (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945) for the purpose of creating a one lot subdivision for commercial and residential E—K169 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-26 SUBTT19945 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 2 condominium purposes related to the development of a 190 unit mixed use development (DRC2014- 01130). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan Mixed Use (MU) land use designation. The tentative tract map will be consistent with the Development Code with the approval of the related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-01131), changing the zoning designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU), consistent with the General Plan land use designation; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan land use designation. The tentative tract map will be consistent with the Development Code with approval of the related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-01131); which changes the zoning designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU), in conformance with the General Plan land use designation; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project site is located at the intersection of two major streets and is adjacent to a transit stop on Foothill Boulevard. The site is well suited for a mixed use development including providing adequate access for vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The Initial Study Part II outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less -than -significant; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The subdivision is for residential purposes, which usually do not cause public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The project includes an access easement to a water pumping station and includes parking within a utility easement. The project is designed to not negatively impact the onsite easements. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was E—K170 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-26 SUBTT19945 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 3 prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of air space (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945) for the purpose of creating a one lot subdivision for commercial and residential condominium purposes related to the development of a 190-unit mixed use development with 3,246 square feet of commercial space located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; APN's: 1100-201-03, 04 and 07. 2) The approval of SUBTT19945 is subject to approval by the City Council of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132, and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-01131, to change the land use designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). 3) The approval is also subject to Planning Commission approval of Development Review DRC2014-01130; Minor Exception DRC2016-00169, Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-01134 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2015-00318. 4) Approval is contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. E—K171 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-26 SUBTT19945 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 4 Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. 10) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: E—K172 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-26 SUBTT19945 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 5 • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 11) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 12) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 13) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 15) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 16) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 19) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. E—K173 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-26 SUBTT19945 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 6 20) All commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 21) All commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 22) All commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 23) All commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 24) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 25) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 26) .All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) Site brushing, grading and/or removal of any vegetation within 300 feet of any known raptor or migratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/summer, songbird, breeding season which is February 1 to August 31 of each year, in order to ensure compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or construction and ground disturbing activities will not take place within 300 feet of nesting songbirds or raptors or 500 feet for burrowing owls if the biologist is unable to verify whether (a) adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. A biological monitor shall be present to prevent impacts within this active nest zone during construction by flagging the Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) with wooden stakes and flagging or tape around the work -exclusion perimeter. The work -exclusion zone will be maintained until a qualified wildlife biologist determines that the nesting cycle is complete. 2) A small mammal exclusion fence will be installed around the north and west perimeter of the project site during winter months to prevent transient access to the site from potentially occurring Species of Special Concern or SBKR or LAPM in the unlikely event that they are present in the grasslands off site. E—K174 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-26 SUBTT19945 —FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 7 3) Runoff from the project must be treated and directed to a storm drain system that does not drain into the Etiwanda Creek Channel south of Foothill Boulevard. 4) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre -construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 5) Provide a fire exclusion wall around the project site, subject to approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the local fire department to avoid accidental ignitions on highly flammable grasslands adjacent to the project site. 6) Should any future improvements be required outside of the project footprint and parcel boundaries, they should be subject to environmental review. E—K175 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-26 SUBTT19945 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 8 7) Prevent ponding of water during construction and eliminate access to open water sources during construction that would attract sensitive species. 8) Plant 52 peppermint gum, E. nicholii spaced 11 feet on center along the north and west property lines and 36 date palms as recommended by the landscape architect. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in -kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: E—K176 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-26 SUBTT19945 —FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 9 • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full- time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. 3) A Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians certified Native American shall be onsite during any and all ground disturbances. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gasses 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. E—K177 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-26 SUBTT19945 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 10 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. E—K178 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-26 SUBTT19945 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 11 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 6) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. E—K179 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-26 SUBTT19945 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 12 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (Madole and Associates - December. 22, 2014) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Noise 1) The developer shall construct noise barriers around patios and balconies located along the east side of Building 1, along the south side and southeast corner of Building 4, and along the entire south and second and third floors of the east side of Building 5. The barrier walls shall be four feet in height at first floor receivers and 3.5 feet in height at second and third floor receivers, and shall meet the minimum design standards detailed within the Acoustical Analysis Report (Kissinger Environmental Consulting — December 11, 2014 and revised on January 25, 2016). 2) The developer shall have an exterior -to -interior noise analysis performed by an acoustical consultant when building plans become available, prior to the issuance of building permits, in order to demonstrate that residential units on site will have interior noise levels that meet the noise standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga by detailing appropriate project design features for meeting such standards. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 4) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10:00 p.m. until 7:00 p.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 5) See mitigation measure 2 above related to providing acoustical analysis at time of building plan check to demonstrate that the residential units will have interior noise levels that meet City of Rancho Cucamonga noise standards. 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. E—K180 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-26 SUBTT19945 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 13 7). Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted during all project site excavation and grading on the site. The project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturer's standards. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MN ATTEST: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of May 2016, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: E—K181 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-26 SUBTT19945 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 14 NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E—K182 Conditions of Approval Duacrro Community Development Department ;aatonca Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRG2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE M��M,';4g'��6F7; �UPL Y T8 YOI-IR l-F?-9JEST: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sale expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 4. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 6. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 7. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. Printed: 5f512016 wNw.CityofRC.us E—K183 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE �K', r ^ �%�0�� ` �y Fg ygElR pRo (€r_T Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided" standards from Cornwall Avenue to East Avenue, as required and including: a. Provide curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, sidewalk, street trees (along development frontage only), 9500 Lumens HPSV-equivalent LED street lights, commercial drive approaches, access ramps at intersections, R26(s) "No Stopping" signs and asphalt pavement, on the north side. Join existing improvements installed as part of Tract 16882. b. Provide 47 feet of travel way from street centerline to north curb face, except at bus bay (additional 11 feet). c. Provide a westbound bus bay/right turn lane for easterly driveway. d. Revise traffic signing and striping, as required. e. Dedication shall be made on Foothill Boulevard, a minimum of 60 feet, measured from street centerline. Additional street right-of-way shelf be dedicated along bus bay, to provide a minimum of 8 feet measured from the face of the curb. f. Proposed bus shelter shall be constructed outside the public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained. g. Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover costs of permanent offsite improvements from future developer of the adjacent property, west of the centerline of the combined easements for MWD, SCE and the Gas Company to the west and east of the east site boundary. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. h. No median breaks allowed in Foothill Boulevard median. i. Extend eastbound left turn pocket to total of 350 in storage length. 1. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. Printed: 5/5/2016 vPm,v.CityofRC.us E-K184 Page 2 of 18 Project #: Project Name: Location: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Foothill & East — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE MRrraP0r'�lapI V -rn y t ir.M ja.PQ Gr-T Engineering Services Del3artment Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. East Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City 'Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way and provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees and 9500 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights and commercial drive approach. b. Provide 32 feet of travel way from centerline to west curb face. c. Driveway to be in accordance with City Driveway Policy. The distance from the signalized intersection shall be measured from BCR to near edge of driveway to be a minimum of 200 feet. d. Revise traffic signing and striping as required. e. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. 3. Modify existing Traffic Signal at Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed in accordance with the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan including street lights. This VIP designates trees, pedestrian crossings at intersections, featuring colored pavement emblazoned with the Route 66 logo, special sidewalk treatments, artwork and a historic post and a cable roadway safety barrier. Said enhancements within the parkway area shall be maintained by the developer and shall be included in the CC & R's. In addition, refer to Exhibit E of the Visual Improvement Plan for the design and construction of the Entry Monument, date palms and other VIP improvements. 5. Revise Dwg. 2255-D to show proposed lateral and catch basin in Foothill Boulevard and junction structure for private storm drain connection. Also, revise Dwg. 2295-D to show the conversion of the temporary CMP to a standard catch basin in East Avenue. 6. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite east of East Avenue to the first pole offsite west of the westerly project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first. All service utility lines crossing Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded too. The developer cannot request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding, Instead the City shall provide a portion of collected monies from the developer to the south, DRC2006-00540, paid for as an in -lieu fee for future undergrounding of said overhead utilities. a. Relocation of 66KV power poles by Southern California Edison Company if necessary shall be paid for and coordinated by the developer on Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. Printed: 51512018 yr mCityofRC.us Page 3 of 18 E—K185 Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE PZ-0 a8r 919 TA YOUR P.Ro-€£T Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 7. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of East Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite south of south project boundary to the first pole offsite south of Foothill Boulevard, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first. All service utility lines crossing East Avenue shall be undergrounded too. 8. The development requires installation of fiber optics conduits, vaults and manholes per City Standard Plans 135-137 on Foothill Boulevard. Also, the improvement plans need to show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes using Standard Plans 135-137. 9. Site is located within Area 8 (modified) of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. Development within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Area is responsible for the City's adopted drainage fee (master plan and regional) as well as reimbursement to other development, or the City, for oversizing of local drainage facilities as determined by the City Engineer. City fees shall be paid prior to first building permit. a. For the Middle Etiwanda Drainage Area, the Master Plan drainage fee is $ 32,199.00 per net acre. Fees are subject to periodic review and increase. b. For Drainage Area 8, the Regional Mainline drainage fee is $ 7,800.00 and there is no Secondary Regional Fee. Fees are subject to periodic review and increase. 10. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way, prior to issuance of building permits: Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Gas Company and Cucamonga Valley Water District. a. Provide Cucamonga Valley Water District access to their property as well as Southern California Edison Company and Southern California Gas Company. 11. An in -lieu fee for one-fourth the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill/East Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. 12. The final Tract Map has to be approved and recorded prior to issuance of building permits. Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard 44 total feet on East Avenue 14. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Printed: 5/5/2016 w .CityafRC.us Page 4 of 16 E—K186 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE POE lAM_ Ml��r�y1f�:%-IRIaLY TB Y9NH p_RQ !€(T Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. 16. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 17. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. 18. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Foothill Boulevard Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Curvilinear Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Median Island Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. 20. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: East Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check Printed: 5/512016 Ww .cayonzc.us E—K187 Page 5 of 15 Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE ����a�t^ as 1>1fl� laPI v TE Y401II' PRO 1€ST• Engineering Services Department Standard conditions of Approval 21. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public andlor private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shalt be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 22. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Printed: 5/5/2015 m w.cityofRC.us Page 6 of 1a E—K188 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE .W-R- 6 — 49 Mau— %.PRL Y T-Q yB6►l� laPBd€ET Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 23.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Activity Centers Botanical Name - Lagerstroemia hybrid Common Name - Lavender Crape Myrtle Hybrid [Ain. Grow Space - 3' Spacing 20' O.C. Triangular Spacing Size - 24" Box Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Printed: 5/512016 wNW.citYOfRc.US report shall be furnished to the require backfill soil amendments, by the Engineering Services E—K189 Page 7 of 18 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE ��'?64a1fir>7iR41� j l� €HAY T49 Y-OUR RROd€tTT Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation _ in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers - Accent Tree Botanical Name - Prunus blireiana Common Name - NCN Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Informal Groupings, not more than 25% of total frontage trees Size - 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 25.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where _ public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers (Preferred Tree Species) Botanical Name - Platanus acerifolia Common Name - London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space - 7' Spacing - 40' O.C. Informal Groupings Size - 15 Gallon Printed: 5/512016 w,m.CityoiRC.us E—K190 Page 8 of 18 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE WPia-ill }�Rnj � PRI Y TE9`nf FO PRO d€ST Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 26. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1).' Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation _ in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers (Acceptable Species) Botanical Name - Platanus racemosa Common Name - California Sycamore Min. Grow Space - 8' Spacing - 50' O.C. Informal Groupings Size - 15 Gallon 27.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)" Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those _ areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. East Avenue Botanical Name - Eucalyptus cladocalyx Common Name - Sugar Gum Min. Grow Space - 6' Spacing - 40' O.C. Size - 15 Gallon 28.Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 29. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan/Visual Improvement Plan: Foothill Boulevard 30, A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 31. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Printed: 5/5/2016 W,M.Ci yofpc.us Page 9 of 16 E-K191 Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE P&MUrJffrl0Lb)U0 %a.RL' Yr TA-Y_-Q_ V -' f3RQJgGT Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 32. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 33. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (ail underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 34. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 35. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 36. Approvals have not been secured from ail utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 37. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way: Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Gas Company and Cucamonga Valley Water District. 38. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating casts for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 39. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval Printed:51512015 %wwv.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 1 a E—K192 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA'Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE T9 Y-9 If R 12140 mST Fi€e Prevention ! New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The current edition California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm Standard 9-3 require the fire alarm/fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. 2. Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. 3. The amount of parking provided and any alternative solution to mitigate deficiencies from establish parking regulations must be approved by the planning department after consultation with the Fire Marshal. Building and Safety Services Department xtndard Conditions of Approval I. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to 5. NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW (S). The structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with current edition of NFPA. Printed: 5/512016 vmvw.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 18 E—K193 Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project (Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9jS'SM�ifi(rn4t 6,WM% Y T-g 14g€(R p4?2d€GT Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Provide draft stops in combustible attics and concealed spaces, in accordance with CBC. 8. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls when required. 9. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. 10. Fire resistive construction of the multi -family dwellings shall be in accordance with the CBC. 11. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistive construction. 12. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 13. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 14. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 15, Project shall comply with the accessibility requirements the current edition of the California Building Code 16. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 17. Construction activity shall only occur in accordance with the times noted in Chapter 17.66 050 DA of the Development Code. 18. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shalt pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 19. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino`s Environmental Health Services Department for approval. 20. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the BuRding and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 21. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. P(Inted: 5/5/2016 k'wm'.C'ryofRC.uS Page 12 of 18 E—K194 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: --- I10020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9&-126144149--- U&M %RR-b' 1 i9 Y--0I f.R PRE1d r7ST Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 1DD-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. The drainage analysis shall include all upstream off -site storm water flows. Off -site storm water flows may be analyzed using AMCII, 25-year storm event criteria. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 12. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. Printed: 5/5/2015 vrmv.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 18 E—K195 Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE FU_PZPilz"J LU M ft2.12RtrY T49- YQ11117 RPO !€ST' Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 15. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 16. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 17. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 18. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 19. This project shall comply with the accessibilty requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout `information for Grading Plans and Permit". 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall Call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; III) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. Printed: 5/5/2016 vrwu.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 18 E—K196 Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9F4UiaP%re 1 VEidF')m%PRf Y TA-Yalw PRO mr-T Grading Section Standard Conditions ofApprovai 23. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 24. Reciprocal access easements far all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 25. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide both legal and physical access to the Cucamonga Valley Water District property along the north boundary of the project. The legal access shall be shown on either the Final Map or by a separate instrument. The physical access shall be shown on the precise grading and drainage plan. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. >-7. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 28. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 29. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wellsfunderground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 30. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 31. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off -site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. Printed: 5/5/2016 wmN.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 18 E—K197 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE caLft 1MPt'bY T9 Y91 f.R €R0-WCT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 33. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 34. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the Class V injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 35. This project is conditioned to accept all upstream off -site Storm water flows onto this project site to be routed, through the project site to a storm drain system. 36. This project shall provide legal and physical to the property along the northerly property line owned by Cucamonga Valley Water District. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjoining property owner(s) allowing grading on the adjacent property(ies). 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide correspondence from the gas company noting the gas company has review the proposed improvements over the gas company easement and that the gas company does not have any further comments regarding said improvements over the gas easement. 39, The land owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 40. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 41. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 42. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. Printed: 5/512016 %raw.Cityo �iRC.us Page 16 of 18 E-K198 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE P&R-A0USLY T4E1 Y9VR PF?6►d€ST Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 43. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific wafer quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 45. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. 46. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 47. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 43. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. vnxw.CityotRC.us Printad:5/512D75 Page 17 of 18 E—K199 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE ga- EU15 ^7^c�iyq c n RRLY TCa—YQUR P.RQ_9€GT' Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 49. The subject project, shall accept all existing off -site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off -site storm water drainage flows mix with any on -site storm water drainage flows, then the off -site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on -site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. Pfinted:5/512016 w v.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 18 E—K200 RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01130, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 190-UNIT, MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR 3,246 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE TO SUPPORT FUTURE MASS TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES ON A SITE LOCATED ON 8.8 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE MIXED USE (MU) ZONING DISTRICT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN'S: 1100-201-03, 04 AND 07. A. Recitals. 1. Foothill and East, LLC filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2014- 01130, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of April 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to May 11, 2016. 3. On the 11th day of May 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearings of April 27, 2016 and continued to May 11, 2016, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site is made up of three (3) parcels totaling 8.8 gross acres of land located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; and b. The site is vacant with a water pumping facility operated by the Cucamonga Valley Water District near the northwest corner of the project site and a grove of Eucalyptus trees that were planted prior to 1938 and were historically used as a wood lot; and C. The site is bounded by vacant land to the north in the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district; by a multi -family development to the south in the Medium (M) Development District; by a flood control facility and single-family residences in the City of Fontana to the east; and, by utility easements to the west in the Open Space (OP) District; and d. The development consists of 190 units including 69 one bedroom units (769 - 774 square feet), 107 two bedroom units (1,068 — 1,322 square feet), 14 three bedroom units (1,352 square feet) and 3,246 square feet of commercial tenant space; and E—K201 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 DRC2014-01130 —FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 2 e. The project includes 384 parking spaces, 38 parking spaces deficient from meeting the parking requirement if developed as a Mixed Use project. A Minor Exception (DRC2016-00169) has been submitted (DRC2016-00169) to reduce the required parking by 38 parking spaces: and f. A Development Code Amendment (DRC2014-01132) to: a) clarify permitted uses in the Mixed Use Zoning Districts by amending Development Code Table 17.36.020-2 (Development Standards for Mixed Use Zoning Districts) by adding 2 separate footnotes clarifying the permitted uses within the Mixed Use Districts and b) modify the facts, figures and tables in Development Code Section 17.36.020, to add the project site as Mixed Use area #14 to the current 13 Mixed Use areas and modify Figures 17.38.060-1 and 17.38.060-15, to change the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed Use (Subarea 4 Map); and g. A Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-01131) is included to change the zoning designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). h. A Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT19945) is included for a one lot subdivision for condominium purposes; and i. A Tree Removal Permit (DRC2014-01134) is included for the removal of 184 eucalyptus trees; and j. A Uniform Sign Program is included providing text and illustrations for the proposed project monumentation (La Mirage on Route 66) for the overall project and wall signs for the potential commercial units; and k. The project exceeds the number of recreational amenities required by the Development Code and includes amenities that meet the interests of residents of all ages. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Mixed Use (MU). The General Plan has a stated policy (Policy LU-4.1) to provide new mixed use development opportunities along the Foothill Boulevard corridor to allow residential, commercial and civic uses, and to accommodate both transit and automobiles. The proposed project is located adjacent to a transit stop and provides the opportunity for a potential mixed use development; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project will be consistent with the Development Code with approval of the related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-01131), which changes the zoning designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU), in conformance with the General Plan land use designation; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project will be in compliance with the Development Code with approval of the related Development Code Amendment (DRC2014-01131) to: a) clarify permitted uses in the Mixed Use E—K202 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 DRC2014-01130— FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 3 Zoning Districts by amending Development Code Table 17.36.020-2 (Development Standards for Mixed Use Zoning Districts) by adding 2 separate footnotes clarifying the permitted uses within the Mixed Use Districts, b) modify the facts, figures and tables in Development Code Section 17.36.020, to add the project site as Mixed Use area #14 to the current 13 Mixed Use areas within the City and Figures 17.38.060-1 and 17.38.060-15, to change the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed Use (Subarea 4 Map) and Minor Exception DRC2016-00169, to reduce the required number of parking spaces; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Initial Study Part II outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less -than -significant. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. E—K203 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 DRC2014-01130 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 4 Plannina Department 1) Approval is for the site plan and architecture of a 190-unit mixed use development with 3,246 square feet of commercial space located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; APN's: 1100-201- 03, 04 and 07. The 3,246 square feet of commercial space may alternatively be developed as live/work units. 2) The approval of DRC2014-01130 is subject to approval by the City Council of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132, to eliminate Development Code Section 17.38.060 (H) (8) and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014- 01131, to change land use designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). 3) The approval is also subject to Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945; Minor Exception DRC2016-00169, Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-01134 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2015-00318. 4) Approval is contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. 5) The total number of residential units is contingent on the applicant obtaining legal access rights from the adjacent easement holders to develop parking within the easement areas. If agreements cannot be reached with the easement holders, the total number of residential units shall be reduced by a commensurate ratio to the number of parking spaces lost. The agreement shall be submitted and deemed adequate prior to the approval of building permits. 6) A Parking Management Plan shall be submitted prior to final Planning Department approval of the completed project and shall at minimum include requirements that a parking pass program be implemented and that the use of the garages and carports be strictly monitored. The Planning Director may periodically review and require additional parking mitigation measures if it is determined that the on -site parking is inadequate to meet the parking demand. 7) The project shall include adequate covered parking spaces to meet the minimum covered parking requirement. 8) The final design of the carports shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director during the plan check. 9) Prior to approval of building permits, an updated noise study shall be submitted verifying whether the existing Cucamonga Valley Water District pumping station, which is located adjacent to the project site, will adversely impact the project site. If it is determined that mitigation measures are E—K204 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 DRC2014-01130 —FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 5 necessary to bring the noise levels produced by the water pumps into compliance with City noise requirements, the plans shall integrate those mitigation measures, including off -site mitigation measures. If necessary, the adequacy of sound attenuation barriers shall be verified by an acoustical engineer. 10) The project shall provide adequate access to the Cucamonga Valley Water District to maintain their pumping station. A letter or equivalent legal documentation from the Cucamonga Valley Water District shall be submitted verifying that this condition has been met to their satisfaction. 11) All perimeter walls and metal fences exposed to public view shall be decorative and include a decorative pilaster at each change in direction of either the wall or metal fence. Fences and walls facing East Avenue shall be compliant with the requirement for the East Avenue theme wall. 12) The final design of the bus shelter bus shelter shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Environmental Mitigation Air Qualify 1) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. E—K205 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 DRC2014-01130 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 6 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. 10) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 11) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 12) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 13) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. E—K206 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 DRC2014-01130 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 7 15) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 16) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 19) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 20) All commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 21) All commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 22) All commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 23) All commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 24) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 25) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 26) .All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) Site brushing, grading and/or removal of any vegetation within 300 feet of any known raptor or migratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/summer, songbird, breeding season which is February 1 to August 31 of each year, in order to ensure compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or construction and ground disturbing activities will not take place within 300 feet of nesting songbirds or raptors or 500 feet for burrowing owls if the biologist is unable to verify whether (a) adult birds have not begun E—K207 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 DRC2014-01130 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 8 egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. A biological monitor shall be present to prevent impacts within this active nest zone during construction by flagging the Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) with wooden stakes and flagging or tape around the work -exclusion perimeter. The work -exclusion zone will be maintained until a qualified wildlife biologist determines that the nesting cycle is complete. 2) A small mammal exclusion fence will be installed around the north and west perimeter of the project site during winter months to prevent transient access to the site from potentially occurring Species of Special Concern or SBKR or LAPM in the unlikely event that they are present in the grasslands off site. 3) Runoff from the project must be treated and directed to a storm drain system that does not drain into the Etiwanda Creek Channel south of Foothill Boulevard. 4) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre -construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. E—K208 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 DRC2014-01130— FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 9 The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 5) Provide a fire exclusion wall around the project site, subject to approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the local fire department to avoid accidental ignitions on highly flammable grasslands adjacent to the project site. 6) Should any future improvements be required outside of the project footprint and parcel boundaries, they should be subject to environmental review. 7) Prevent ponding of water during construction and eliminate access to open water sources during construction that would attract sensitive species. 8) Plant 52 peppermint gum, E. nicholii spaced 11 feet on center along the north and west property lines and 36 date palms as recommended by the landscape architect. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in -kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. E—K209 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 DRC2014-01130 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 10 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full- time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. 3) A Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians certified Native American shall be onsite during any and all ground disturbances. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. E—K210 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 DRC2014-01130 —FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 11 Greenhouse Gasses 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contactor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: E—K211 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 DRC2014-01130 —FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 12 • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain E—K212 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 DRC2014-01130 — FOOTH ILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 13 system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 6) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (Madole and Associates - December. 22 2014) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Noise 1) The developer shall construct noise barriers around patios and balconies located along the east side of Building 1, along the south side and southeast corner of Building 4, and along the entire south and second and third floors of the east side of Building 5. The barrier walls shall be 4 feet in height at first floor receivers and 3.5 feet in height at second and third floor receivers, and shall meet the minimum design standards detailed within the Acoustical Analysis Report (Kinsinger Environmental Consulting — December 11, 2014 and revised on January 25, 2016). 2) The developer shall have an exterior -to -interior noise analysis performed by an acoustical consultant when building plans become available, prior to the issuance of building permits, in order to demonstrate that residential units on site will have interior noise levels that meet the noise standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga by detailing appropriate project design features for meeting such standards. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. E—K213 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 DRC2014-01130 —FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 14 4) Business operations shall main hours of 10:00 p.m. until 7:0 0 5) See mitigation measure 2 above related to providing acoustical analysis at time of building plan check to demonstrate that the residential units will have interior noise levels that meet City of Rancho Cucamonga noise standards. 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted during all project site excavation and grading on the site. The project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturer's standards. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. E—K214 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-27 DRC2014-01130 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 15 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA go Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of May 2016, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E—K215 Conditions of Approval w�Ho (;naaattmmca Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 1V1 -00- II&9�-E:E�1lA��lE+iVf2i �l Y To YOUR p1 gjK.GT Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shaft be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 4. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 6. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 7. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. Printed: 5152016 WAW.C4OfRC.us E—K216 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 91-320140%, ftftM— - % '�Y M YOUR P.RQ-(€SF Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided" standards from Cornwall Avenue to East Avenue, as required and including: a. Provide curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, sidewalk, street trees (along development frontage only), 9500 Lumens HPSV-equivalent LED street Bights, commercial drive approaches, access ramps at intersections, R26(s) "No Stopping" signs and asphalt pavement, on the north side. Join existing improvements installed as part of Tract 16882. b. Provide 47 feet of travel wa,y from street centerline to north curb face, except at bus bay (additional 11 feet). c. Provide a westbound bus bay/fight turn lane for easterly driveway. d. Revise traffic signing and striping, as required, e. Dedication shall be made on FoothM Boulevard, a minimum of 60 feet, measured from street centerline. Additional street right-cf way shall be dedicated along bus bay, to provide a minimum of 8 feet measured from the face of the curb. f. Proposed bus shelter shalt be constructed outside the public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained. g. Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover costs of permanent offsite improvements from future developer of the adjacent property, west of the centerline of the combined easements for MWD, SCE and the Gas Company to the west and east of the east site boundary. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. h. No median breaks allowed in Foathff Boulevard median. i. Extend eastbound left turn pocket to total of 350 in storage length. j. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. Printed: 5/512016 vrmvZitYofPc.us E-K217 Page 2 of 18 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9&rrarrY�ir4e4 .%& W%PP1=-Y 4:9—Y1: UR Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the foRowing Special Conditions 2. East Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way and provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees and 9500 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights and commercial drive approach. b. Provide 32 feet of travel way from centerline to west curb face. c. Driveway to be in accordance with City Driveway Policy. The distance from the signalized intersection shall be measured from BCR to near edge of driveway to be a minimum of 200 feet. d. Revise traffic signing and striping as required. e. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. 3. Modify existing Traffic Signal at Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed in accordance with the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan including street lights. This VIP designates trees, pedestrian crossings at intersections, featuring colored pavement emblazoned with the Route 66logo, special sidewalk treatments, artwork and a historic post and a cable roadway safety barrier. Said enhancements within the parkway area shall be maintained by the developer and shall be included in the CC & R's. In addition, refer to Exhibit E of the Visual Improvement Plan for the design and construction of the Entry Monument, date palms and other VIP improvements. 5. Revise Dwg. 2255-D to show proposed lateral and catch basin in Foothill Boulevard and junction structure for private storm drain connection. Also, revise Dwg. 2295-D to show the conversion of the temporary CMP to a standard catch basin in East Avenue. 6. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite east of East Avenue to the first pole offsite west of the westerly project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first. All service utility lines crossing Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded too. The developer cannot request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding, Instead the City shall provide a portion of collected monies from the developer to the south, DRC2006-00540, paid for as an in -lieu fee for future undergrounding of said overhead utilities. a. Relocation of 66KV power poles by Southern California Edison Company if necessary shall be paid for and coordinated by the developer on Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. Printed: 5/5/2016 w'MN.CityofRC.uS Page 3 of 18 E—K218 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9WMt40 � � n 0 1 YTA-Y9UR Rp?04€ST Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 7. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of East Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite south of south project boundary to the first pole offsite south of FoothM Boulevard, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first. All service utility lines crossing East Avenue shall be undergrounded too. 8. The development requires installation of fiber optics conduits, vaults and manholes per City Standard Plans 135-137 on Foothill Boulevard. Also, the improvement plans need to show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes using Standard Plans 135-137. 9. Site is located within Area 8 (modified) of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. Development within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Area is responsible for the City's adopted drainage fee (master plan and regional) as well as reimbursement to other development, or the City, for oversizing of local drainage facilities as determined by the City Engineer. City fees shall be paid prior to first building permit. a. For the Middle Etiwanda Drainage Area, the Master Plan drainage fee is $ 32,199.00 per net acre. Fees are subject to periodic review and increase. b. For Drainage Area 8, the Regional Mainline drainage fee is $ 7,800.00 and there is no Secondary Regional Fee. Fees are subject to periodic review and increase. 10. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way, prior to issuance of building permits: Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Gas Company and Cucamonga Valley Water District. a. Provide Cucamonga Valley Water District access to their property as well as Southern California Edison Company and Southern California Gas Company. 11. An in -lieu fee for one-fourth the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill/East Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. 12. The final Tract Map has to be approved and recorded prior to issuance of building permits. Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard 44 total feet on East Avenue ' 4. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Printed: 5/5/2016 w W.Cityo tfZc.us E—K219 Page 4 of 18 Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE PBEROr&i4'6Mi7 f>flfb % Y T-9 YOUR P_R9J€£T Enctineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. 16. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 17. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. 18. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for v:hich a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Foothill Boulevard Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Curvilinear Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Median Island Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. 20. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: East Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check Printed: 5/512016 vrmw.Ci.yofRC.us Page 5 of 1 B E—K220 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9Z.P-M140 Y 79 Y4 1kR PRO d€ST Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 22. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Printed: 5/512016 mw.CityofRC.us E—K221 Page 6 of 18 Project #: Project Name: Location: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Foothill & East -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9U--P- 14%n1��AW8 %PP-1Y T49 Y9i ('? pP6id€ST Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 23, Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Activity Centers Botanical Name - Lagerstroemia hybrid Common Name - Lavender Crape Myrtle Hybrid Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Triangular Spacing Size - 24" Box Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Printed: 5/512016 w w.Cityofi2C.us Page 7 of 18 E—K222 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9 --PZ- r RA1q Ei�ij9 rR�7l� oor v rn vnr ro PRO €ST Engineering Services department Standard conditions of Approval 24.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation _ in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers - Accent Tree Botanical Name - Prunus blireiana Common Name - NCN Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Informal Groupings, not more than 25% of total frontage trees Size - 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 25, Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those _ areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers (Preferred Tree Species) Botanical Name - Platanus acerifolia Common Name - London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space - 7' Spacing - 40' O.C. Informal Groupings Size -15 Gallon Printed: 515/2018 vnnror.CityofRC.us E—K223 Page 8 of 18 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9UMAMSLft Engineering Services Department standard conditions of Approval 26. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shaRt appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a Pine item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend an Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those _ areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers (Acceptable Species) Botanical Name - Platanus racemosa Common Name - California Sycamore Min. Grow Space - 8' Spacing - 50' O.C. Informal Groupings Size - 15 Gallon 27. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shalt appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a lane item within the construction legend stating: °Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those _ areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. East Avenue Botanical Name - Eucalyptus cladocalyx Common Name - Sugar Gum Min. Grow Space - 6' Spacing - 40' O.C. Size - 15 Gallon 28.Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 29. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan/Visual Improvement Plan: Foothill Boulevard 30. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 31. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Printed: 5/5/2016 W,"V.CityofRc.us Page 9 of 13 E—K224 Project#`. SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE .9&EEO147?,V' Mf$` 1R.L. TE}-y$9R PROJECT -- Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 32. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 33. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 34, The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 35. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 36. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 37. Permits shall be obtained from the felEowing agencies for work within their right of way: SCuthem California Edison Company, Southern Ca5forn@a Gas Company and Cucamonga Valley Water District, 38. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 39. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval Printed: 5/5/2016 vnvw.C"fyofRC.us Page 10 of 16 E—K225 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00D27, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE �F4�riaA�f�r{lrnJ9 � �` 121 y T-EI y-gi f ? PP f€ST Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The current edition California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm Standard 9-3 require the fire alarm/fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station monitoring system. A manual and or automatic. fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. 2. Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. 3. The amount of parking provided and any alternative solution to mitigate deficiencies from establish parking regulations must be approved by the planning department after consultation with the Fire Marshal. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Seaver Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW (S). 6. The structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with current edition of NFPA. Printed: 515l2016 wr N.CltyofRC.us Page 11 of 18 E-K226 Project9: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE .9&-0RIAW_ dab %RRJY 7:9 44 UR pRo F€GT Building and SafetV Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Provide draft stops in combustible attics and concealed spaces, in accordance with CBC. 8. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls when required. 9. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. 10. Fire resistive construction of the multi -family dwellings shall be in accordance with the CBC. 11. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistive construction. 12. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 13. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 14. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 16. Project shall comply with the accessibility requirements the current edition of the California Building Code 16. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 17. Construction activity shall only occur in accordance with the times noted in Chapter 17.66 050 D-4 of the Development Code. 18. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 19. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval. 20. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 21. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Panning Division's public counter). Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan (s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. Printed, 5/5/2016 wmw.CityofRC.us Page 12 or 18 E—K227 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign F4a ALL OF THE 9W 0-0L �A!&MW%{ppt y TgYoErR Ml-Eld€gF Grading Section standard conditions of Approval 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit, 8, A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. The drainage analysis shall include all upstream off -site storm water flows. Off -site storm water flows may be analyzed using AMCII, 25-year storm event criteria. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 12. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. Prirded: 5/5/2016 vmv.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 18 E—K228 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE gaR Mil�ifl?J���� Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code, 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 15. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessi,bitity parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 16, Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 17. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 18. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 19. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; III) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. Printed: 5/512016 vmP&.CityoPRC.us Page 14 of 18 E—K229 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE W'a.eWUMIPPLY To Yof fii !p!'r 1 f€ET Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 23. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 24. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 25. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide both legal and physical access to the Cucamonga Valley Water District property along the north boundary of the project. The legal access shall be shown on either the Final Map or by a separate instrument. The physical access shall be shown on the precise grading and drainage plan. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shalt also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 28. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 29. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wetls(underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 30. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 31. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off -site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). This shalt be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. Printed: 5/52016 V e V.CityafRC.us Page 15 of 18 E—K230 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE. bra j'" � �MMU%PatYT9 `oitR€F61d€ET Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 33, Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 34. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 35. This project is conditioned to accept all upstream off -site storm water flows onto this project site to be routed, through the project site to a storm drain system. 36. This project shall provide legal and physical to the property along the northerly property line owned by Cucamonga Valley Water District. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjoining property owner(s) allowing grading on the adjacent property(ies). 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide correspondence from the gas company noting the gas company has review the proposed improvements over the gas company easement and that the gas company does not have any further comments regarding said improvements over the gas easement. 39. The land owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 40. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 41. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 42. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. Printed: 502016 w�",I.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 18 E-K231 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE PUZZA7Y=4 T9—Y-W fR PRC)d€ST Grading Section ,standard Conditions of Approval 43. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 45. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. 46. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 47. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 48. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. Pfinted: 51512016 www.CityotRC.us Page 17 of 18 E—K232 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, nMiinnoer Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign � ALL OF THE � �Sa�f"__W.R 11b UPLY TO YOUR PgQ.1€9T Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 49. The subject project, shall accept all existing off -site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off -site storm water drainage flows mix with any on -site storm water drainage flows, then the off -site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on -site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. Printed: 5/5/2016 w,"v.cityofRC.us Page 18 of 18 E—K233 RESOLUTION NO. 16-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00169, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING BY UP TO 38 SPACES RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 190-UNIT, MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR 3,246 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE TO SUPPORT FUTURE MASS TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES ON A PROJECT SITE OF 8.8 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE MIXED USE (MU) ZONING DISTRICT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE— APN'S: 1100-201- 03, 04 AND 07. A. Recitals. 1. Foothill and East, LLC filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2016- 00169, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of April 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to May 11, 2016. 3. On the 11th day of May 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearings of May 11, 2016, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site is made up of three (3) parcels totaling 8.8 gross acres of land located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; and b. The site is vacant with a water pumping facility operated by the Cucamonga Valley Water District near the northwest corner of the project site and a grove of Eucalyptus trees that were planted prior to 1938 and were historically used as a wood lot; and C. The site is bounded by vacant land to the north in the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district; by a multi -family development to the south in the Medium (M) Development District; by a flood control facility and single-family residences in the City of Fontana to the east; and, by utility easements to the west in the Open Space (OP) District; and d. The development consists of 190 units including 69 one bedroom units (769 - 774 square feet), 107 two bedroom units (1,068 — 1,322 square feet), 14 three bedroom units (1,352 square feet) and 3,246 square feet of commercial tenant space; and E—K234 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-28 DRC2016-00169 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 2 e. The applicant has filed a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00169) to reduce the required parking by 38 parking spaces (9 percent). Minor Exceptions permit an up to 25 percent reduction in the required on -site parking. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. The proposed reduction of the required number of parking spaces is consistent with the General Plan, which has stated policies to support development projects that require infill development to be designed for pedestrians and automobiles equally, and to provide connections to transit and bicycle facilities. (General Plan Policy LU.2). The project is located adjacent to a transit stop, provides 174 secure bicycle parking spaces and provides convenient access to pedestrians and automobiles. b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed high density/mixed use project is located on a major thoroughfare that is in near proximity to similar multi -family projects. C. The proposed Minor Exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed reduction in the parking standards is necessary to allow increased residential density on the project site, which is located adjacent to a transit stop. The General Plan has a stated policy (Policy LU-4.1) to provide new mixed use development opportunities along the Foothill Boulevard corridor to allow residential, commercial and civic uses, and to accommodate both transit and automobiles. The proposed project is located adjacent to a transit stop and provides the 3,246 square feet of commercial tenant space. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to reduce the required number of parking spaces where it has been demonstrated that the project will provide adequate parking for all of the proposed on - site uses. The applicant has submitted a parking study (LSA; August 18, 2015) verifying the adequacy of the proposed number of on -site parking spaces. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a E—K235 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-28 DRC2016-00169 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 3 significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannino Department 1) Approval is to reduce the required parking by up to 38 parking related to the development of a 190-unit mixed use development with 3,246 square feet of commercial space located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; APN's: 1100-201-03, 04 and 07. 2) The approval of DRC2016-00169 is subject to approval by the City Council of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-01131, to change land use designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). 3) The approval is also subject to Planning Commission approval of Development Review DRC2014-01.130, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945, Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-01134 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2015-00318. 4) Approval is contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. E—K236 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-28 DRC2016-00169 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of May 2016, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E—K237 Conditions of Approval (]jenucn;o 100" CommunityDeveroPment Department Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE � 4aA�'"�4� - ftI-AR Y TO V49UR PRQ JEGT• Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolufion of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mifigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheets) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 4. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 6. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants andfor pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 7. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. Printed: 5/5/2016 w .CkWRC.us E—K238 Project9: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 96-0ZZ" OSL-M& %RF>LY 1-:9-Y9UR P.Q0 f€ST Engineering Services Department: Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided" standards from Cornwall Avenue to East Avenue, as required and including: a. Provide curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, sidewalk, street trees (along development frontage only), 9500 Lumens HPSV-equivalent LED street lights, commercial drive approaches, access ramps at intersections, R26(s) "No Stopping" signs and asphalt pavement, on the north side. Join existing improvements installed as part of Tract 16882. b. Provide 47 feet of travel way from street centerline to north curb face, except at bus bay (additional 11 feet). c. Provide a westbound bus bay/right turn lane for easterly driveway. d. Revise traffic signing and striping, as required. e. Dedication shall be made on Foothill Boulevard, a minimum of 60 feet, measured from street centerline. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along bus bay, to provide a minimum of 8 feet measured from the face of the curb. f. Proposed bus shelter shall be constructed outside the public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained. g. Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover costs of permanent offsite improvements from future developer of the adjacent property, west of the centerline of the combined easements for MWD, SCE and the Gas Company to the west and east of the east site boundary. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. h. No median breaks allowed in Foothill Boulevard median. i. Extend eastbound left turn pocket to total of 350 in storage length. j. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. Printed: 5/512016 v�.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 16 E—K239 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110D20103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 951901 0 >I I �faR6y F9-You.;? R1 o-mr-T. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. East Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way and provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees and 9500 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights and commercial drive approach. b. Provide 32 feet of travel way from centerline to west curb face. c. Driveway to be in accordance with City Driveway Policy. The distance from the signalized intersection shall be measured from BCR to near edge of driveway to be a minimum of 200 feet. d. Revise traffic signing and striping as required. e. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. 3. Modify existing Traffic Signal at Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed in accordance with the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan including street lights. This VIP designates trees, pedestrian crossings at intersections, featuring colored pavement emblazoned with the Route 66 logo, special sidewalk treatments, artwork and a historic post and a cable roadway safety barrier. Said enhancements within the parkway area shall be maintained by the developer and shall be included in the CC & R's. In addition, refer to Exhibit E of the Visual Improvement Plan for the design and construction of the Entry Monument, date palms and other VIP improvements. 5. Revise Dwg. 2255-D to show proposed lateral and catch basin in Foothill Boulevard and junction structure for private storm drain connection. Also, revise Dwg. 2295-D to show the conversion of the temporary CMP to a standard catch basin in East Avenue. 6. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite east of East Avenue to the first pole offsite west of the westerly project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first. All service utility lines crossing Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded too. The developer cannot request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding, Instead the City shall provide a portion of collected monies from the developer to the south, DRC2006-00540, paid for as an in -lieu fee for future undergrounding of said overhead utilities. a. Relocation of 66KV power poles by Southern California Edison Company if necessary shall be paid for and coordinated by the developer on Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. Printed: 5/5/2016 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 15 E—K240 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9Z_ _9 M_ :4 U M%112R6Y TO Y9- UR PROd€GT' Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 7. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of East Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite south of south project boundary to the first pole offsite south of Foothill Boulevard, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first. All service utility lines crossing East Avenue shall be undergrounded too. 8. The development requires installation of fiber optics conduits, vaults and manholes per City Standard Plans 135-137 on Foothill Boulevard. Also, the improvement plans need to show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes using Standard Plans 135-137. 9. Site is located within Area 8 (modified) of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. Development within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Area is responsible for the City's adopted drainage fee (master plan and regional) as well as reimbursement to other development, or the City, for oversizing of local drainage facilities as determined by the City Engineer. City fees shall be paid prior to first building permit. a. For the Middle Etiwanda Drainage Area, the Master Plan drainage fee is $ 32,199.00 per net acre. Fees are subject to periodic review and increase. b. For Drainage Area 8, the Regional Mainline drainage fee is $ 7,800.00 and there is no Secondary Regional Fee. Fees are subject to periodic review and increase. 10. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way, prior to issuance of building permits: Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Gas Company and Cucamonga Valley Water District. a. Provide Cucamonga Valley Water District access to their property as well as Southern California Edison Company and Southern California Gas Company. 11. An in -lieu fee for one-fourth the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill/East Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. 12. The final Tract Map has to be approved and recorded prior to issuance of building permits. Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard 44 total feet on East Avenue 14, Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/5/2016 Page 4 of 18 E—K241 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE FZ'r"' ' %AR-Y To-Y91f{; ARg-fr=ST• Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. 16. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 17. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. 18. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Foothill Boulevard Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Curvilinear Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Median Island Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. and overlays will be determined during plan check. 20. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: East Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (b) Pavement reconstruction Printed: 5/512016 w .CityofRC.us Page 5 of 16 E—K242 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9Z_R RI4W_ _ Y961.9RlRgd€GT- Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 22. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Printed: 5/5/2016 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 18 E—K243 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE .M---5aP,';,7W6%ft- HW- N- PRbY M- - Y0UR PQQ—Wr€G- T.- Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 23.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Activity Centers Botanical Name - Lagerstroemia hybrid Common Name - Lavender Crape Myrtle Hybrid Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Triangular Spacing Size - 24" Box Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Printed; 5/5/2016 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 18 E-K244 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE @F4�6aA'' ?Y�O 1 i ` Rf1�Y T49 YQUR Rls Q k:=GT Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers - Accent Tree Botanical Name - Prunus blireiana Common Name - NCN Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Informal Groupings, not more than 25% of total frontage trees Size -15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 25.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)" Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers (Preferred Tree Species) Botanical Name - Platanus acerifolia Common Name - London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space - 7' Spacing - 40' O.C. Informal Groupings Size - 15 Gallon Printed: 515/2016 `N'n" n'.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 18 E—K245 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE PUE25,AW 8w%PR6YTO-YONH AROJECT.• Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 26. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers (Acceptable Species) Botanical Name - Platanus racemosa Common Name - California Sycamore Min. Grow Space - 8' Spacing - 50' O.C. Informal Groupings Size - 15 Gallon 27.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. East Avenue Botanical Name - Eucalyptus cladocalyx Common Name - Sugar Gum Min. Grow Space - 6' Spacing - 40' O.C. Size - 15 Gallon 28.Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 29. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan/Visual Improvement Plan: Foothill Boulevard 30. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 31. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. www.CityotRC.us Printed: 5/5@016 Page 9 of 18 E—K246 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE PWREZtA1 WA;M ' AM%.12-R&Y TO YOUR PRO J€GT• Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 32. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 33. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 34. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 35. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 36. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 37. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way: SOuthem California Edison Company, Southern California Gas Company and Cucamonga Valley Water District. 38. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 39. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval Printed: 51512016 www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 16 E—K247 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9l4�Safl: ; y AMb %RRL y T6Q y4pItw Aw)- €GT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The current edition California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm Standard 9-3 require the fire alarm/fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. 2. Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. 3. The amount of parking provided and any alternative solution to mitigate deficiencies from establish parking regulations must be approved by the planning department after consultation with the Fire Marshal. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW (S). 6. The structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with current edition of NFPA. Printed: 5/5/2016 www.CityofRC.us page 11 of 16 E—K248 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9&05AM- 5.- T9 YOUR RROJEWT' Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Provide draft stops in combustible attics and concealed spaces, in accordance with CBC. 8. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls when required. 9. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. 10. Fire resistive construction of the multi -family dwellings shall be in accordance with the CBC. 11. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistive construction. 12. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 13. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 14. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 15. Project shall comply with the accessibility requirements the current edition of the California Building Code 16. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 17. Construction activity shall only occur in accordance with the times noted in Chapter 17.66 050 D-4 of the Development Code. 18. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 19. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval. 20. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 21. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. Printed: 5/52016 w .CilyofRC.us Page 12 of 18 E—K249 Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9V 50 T49 Y4^96f.R RlRQ_fE£T: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. The drainage analysis shall include all upstream off -site storm water flows. Off -site storm water flows may be analyzed using AMCII, 25-year storm event criteria. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 12. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 51512016 Page 13 of 18 E—K250 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9Z_ z0_ 1 14$0$ �iff��` %PR—E Y T9 Y9UP PROW€GT: cvv r rn •v Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 15. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 16. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 17. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 18. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 19. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. W'MN.CityofRC.ua Printed:6/5/2016 Page 14 of 18 E—K251 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 96-0-50t, WNft&AM% -PL Y T-2-youR .P.Rad€ST' Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 23. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 24. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shell be provided for by CC&R's and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 25. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide both legal and physical access to the Cucamonga Valley Water District property along the north boundary of the project. The legal access shall be shown on either the Final Map or by a separate instrument. The physical access shall be shown on the precise grading and drainage plan. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 28. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 29. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 30. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 31. Prior to issuance of a wail permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off -site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. Printed: 5/5/2015 W W W.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 18 E—K252 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9Z_R M;;�.,�;�Y� � %pp-i YTES-Yoif.R P.Ro-€GT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 33. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 34. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 35. This project is conditioned to accept all upstream off -site storm water flows onto this project site to be routed, through the project site to a storm drain system. 36. This project shall provide legal and physical to the property along the northerly property line owned by Cucamonga Valley Water District. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjoining property owner(s) allowing grading on the adjacent property(ies). 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide correspondence from the gas company noting the gas company has review the proposed improvements over the gas company easement and that the gas company does not have any further comments regarding said improvements over the gas easement. 39. The land owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 40. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 41. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 42. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. i Printed: 51512016 w .CityofRC.us Page 16 of 18 E-K253 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE PEE SaRit4W AMU %Ap> Y M Y69UR PRQJ9GT Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 43. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 45. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. 46. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 47. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 48. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. Printed: 5/5/2016 w .Cltyofi2C.us Page 17 of 18 E—K254 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: --- 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE W- 25I RRL-Y T6Q WUR RRn_fr=6T- Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 49. The subject project, shall accept all existing off -site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. if existing off -site storm water drainage flows mix with any on -site storm water drainage flows, then the off -site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on -site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. Printed: 5/5/2016 Wv .CityotRC.us Page 18 of 18 E—K255 RESOLUTION NO. 16-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-01134, A REQUEST TO REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 184 TREES RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 190-UNIT, MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR 3,246 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE TO SUPPORT FUTURE MASS TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES ON A PROJECT SITE OF 8.8 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE MIXED USE (MU) ZONING DISTRICT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE: AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN'S: 1100-201-03, 04 AND 07. A. Recitals. 1. Foothill and East, LLC filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2014- 01134, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of April 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to May 11, 2016. 3. On the 11th day of May 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearings of April 27, 2016 and continued to May 11, 2016, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site is made up of three (3) parcels totaling 8.8 gross acres of land located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; and b. The application applies to a vacant lot with 184 eucalyptus trees located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue, with a street frontage of approximately 750 feet on Foothill Boulevard and 500 feet on East Avenue, with corresponding lot depths to the street frontages; and C. The site is bounded by vacant land to the north in the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district; by a multi -family development to the south in the Medium (M) Development District; by a flood control facility and single-family residences in the City of Fontana to the east; and, by utility easements to the west in the Open Space (OP) District; and E—K256 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-29 DRC2014-01134 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 2 The trees have been determined to be poor candidates for integration into the project landscape design. The project site also does not border the future location of the proposed community trail (approximately $50 feet to the northwest), making it infeasible to provide a 20 foot wide tree lined connection. d. Tree Removal Permit (DRC2014-01134) is being requested for the removal of 184 eucalyptus trees. It has been determined that the on -site eucalyptus trees are in poor condition due to pest infestation, lack of care and maintenance and other observed structural deficiencies (Kisinger Environmental Consulting - December 17, 2014). The arborist report recommends planting 52 eucalyptus trees and 36 date palms in a configuration recommended by the landscape architect. The landscape plan submitted for the project includes the planting of a total of 267 new trees on the project site, including the 88 trees recommended for replacement by the arborist report; and e. Removal of the 184 onsite eucalyptus trees is necessary in order to construct the related 190 unit mixed use project (DRC2014-01331); and f. There are other mature trees in the surrounding area; the removal will not negatively impact the established character of the area or the surrounding property values, as the proposed project includes the planting of 267 new trees, 83 trees more than currently exist on the project site; and g. It is necessary to remove a portion of the onsite trees to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way; and h. The Arborist Report (Kisinger Environmental Consulting - December 17, 2014) states that the 184 onsite eucalyptus trees cannot be preserved due to the poor condition of the trees and that the trees are poor candidates for relocation rather than removal; and i. The trees do constitute a significant natural resource of the City. Because of the poor condition of the trees as outlined in the Arborist Report (Kisinger Environmental Consulting - December 17, 2014), preservation of the trees is not feasible. The Arborist Report recommends planting 52 new eucalyptus trees and 36 date palms in a configuration recommended by the landscape architect. The Landscape Plan submitted for the project includes the planting of 52 eucalyptus trees spaced 11 feet on center along the north and west property lines and the 36 date palms planted throughout the project site. Due to the poor condition of the trees, as outlined above, all 184 existing remnant eucalyptus trees are recommended for removal. The landscape plan includes a total of 267 new trees to be planted on the project site, including the 88 trees recommended for replacement by the arborist report. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Tree Removal Permit is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The related mixed use development (Design Review DRC2014-01130) is consistent with the General Plan Mixed Use (MU) land use designation. The removal of the subject trees is necessary to develop the related 190 unit mixed use development; and b. The proposed Tree Removal Permit will be accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which permits the removal of heritage trees when associated to a development of the project site. In this case removal of the trees are necessary to construct a related 190 Unit mixed use development. Additionally, the Arborist Report submitted for the related project (Kisinger E—K257 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-29 DRC2014-01134 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 3 Environmental Consulting - December 17, 2014) determined that the on -site eucalyptus trees are in poor condition due to pest infestation, lack of care and maintenance and other observed structural deficiencies and are poor candidates for integration into the project landscape design; and C. The proposed Tree Removal Permit will be compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code including replacement of the removed trees with trees of a species and quantity commensurate with the aesthetic value of the trees to be removed. In this case, 267 trees will be planted as part of the related development, 83 more trees than will be removed; and d. The proposed Tree Removal Permit, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as the 184 onsite eucalyptus trees will be replaced with 267 new trees, including 52 new eucalyptus trees. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. E—K258 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-29 DRC2014-01134 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 4 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is to remove 184 onsite eucalyptus trees related to the development of a 190-unit mixed use development with 3,246 square feet of commercial space located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; APN's: 1100-201-03, 04 and 07. 2) The approval of DRC2014-01134 is subject to approval by the City Council of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-01131, to change land use designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). 3) The approval is also subject to Planning Commission approval of Development Review DRC2014-01130, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945, Minor Exception DRC2016-00169 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2015- 00318. 4) Approval is contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. 5) A minimum 267 trees shall be planted on the project site as shown on the related Landscape Plan submitted for the project. This includes the planting of 52 eucalyptus trees spaced 11 feet on center along the north and west property lines and the 36 date palms planted throughout the project site. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA go ATTEST: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary E—K259 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-29 DRC2014-01134 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC May 11, 2016 Page 5 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of May 2016, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E—K260 Conditions of Approval '.AMON cA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRG2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9&---P r" Mk-UMS-0R ►"Int Y TO YOUR PR61a18GT• Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 4. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 6. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants andlor pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 7. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. Printed: 5/5/2016 www.CityofRC.us E-K261 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9U--P-14i0R.-U&= Dor y 7:g ygUR €pod€GT Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided" standards from Cornwall Avenue to East Avenue, as required and including: a. Provide curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, sidewalk, street trees (along development frontage only), 9500 Lumens HPSV-equivalent LED street lights, commercial drive approaches, access ramps at intersections, R26(s) "No Stopping" signs and asphalt pavement, on the north side. Join existing improvements installed as part of Tract 16882. b. Provide 47 feet of travel way from street centerline to north curb face, except at bus bay (additional 11 feet). c. Provide a westbound bus bay/right turn lane for easterly driveway. d. Revise traffic signing and striping, as required. e. Dedication shall be made on Foothill Boulevard, a minimum of 60 feet, measured from street centerline. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along bus bay, to provide a minimum of 8 feet measured from the face of the curb. f. Proposed bus shelter shall be constructed outside the public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained. g. Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover costs of permanent offsite improvements from future developer of the adjacent property, west of the centerline of the combined easements for MWD, SCE and the Gas Company to the west and east of the east site boundary. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. h. No median breaks allowed in Foothill Boulevard median. I. Extend eastbound left turn pocket to total of 350 in storage length. j. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. Printed: 5/5/2016 vnvw.CityofRC.us E—K262 Page 2 of 18 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 90-2— 4r 7iWIGft- o�v TE�YBN ' f-'RAd€ST Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. East Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way and provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees and 9500 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights and commercial drive approach. b. Provide 32 feet of travel way from centerline to west curb face. c. Driveway to be in accordance with City Driveway Policy. The distance from the signalized intersection shall be measured from BCR to near edge of driveway to be a minimum of 200 feet. d. Revise traffic signing and striping as required. e. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. 3. Modify existing Traffic Signal at Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 1. The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed in accordance with the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan including street lights. This VIP designates trees, pedestrian crossings at intersections, featuring colored pavement emblazoned with the Route 66 logo, special sidewalk treatments, artwork and a historic post and a cable roadway safety barrier. Said enhancements within the parkway area shall be maintained by the developer and shall be included in the CC & R's. In addition, refer to Exhibit E of the Visual Improvement Plan for the design and construction of the Entry Monument, date palms and other VIP improvements. 5. Revise Dwg. 2255-D to show proposed lateral and catch basin in Foothill Boulevard and junction structure for private storm drain connection. Also, revise Dwg. 2295-D to show the conversion of the temporary CMP to a standard catch basin in East Avenue. 6. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite east of East Avenue to the first pole offsite west of the westerly project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first. All service utility lines crossing Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded too. The developer cannot request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding, Instead the City shall provide a portion of collected monies from the developer to the south, DRC2006-00540, paid for as an in -lieu fee for future undergrounding of said overhead utilities. a. Relocation of 66KV power poles by Southern California Edison Company if necessary shall be paid for and coordinated by the developer on Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. Printed: 5/5/2016 ww .CityofRC.us Page 3 of IS E—K263 Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE FEE -25:; YWCWMM iPPf Y T49 YQ r IR PRO far—T: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 7. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of East Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite south of south project boundary to the first pole offsite south of Foothill Boulevard, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first. All service utility lines crossing East Avenue shall be undergrounded too. 8. The development requires installation of fiber optics conduits, vaults and manholes per City Standard Plans 135-137 on Foothill Boulevard. Also, the improvement plans need to show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes using Standard Plans 135-137. 9. Site is located within Area 8 (modified) of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. Development within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Area is responsible for the City's adopted drainage fee (master plan and regional) as well as reimbursement to other development, or the City, for oversizing of local drainage facilities as determined by the City Engineer. City fees shall be paid prior to first building permit. a. For the Middle Etiwanda Drainage Area, the Master Plan drainage fee is $ 32,199.00 per net acre. Fees are subject to periodic review and increase. b. For Drainage Area 8, the Regional Mainline drainage fee is $ 7,800.00 and there is no Secondary Regional Fee. Fees are subject to periodic review and increase. 10. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way, prior to issuance of building permits: Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Gas Company and Cucamonga Valley Water District. a. Provide Cucamonga Valley Water District access to their property as well as Southern California Edison Company and Southern California Gas Company. 11. An in -lieu fee for one-fourth the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill/East Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. 12. The final Tract Map has to be approved and recorded prior to issuance of building permits. Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard 44 total feet on East Avenue 14. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Printed: 515/2016 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 15 E—K264 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE M26aJfit?J91W`f�€�Y FA�'A6fR R€Ad€GT' Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. 16. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 17. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. 18. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Foothill Boulevard Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Curvilinear Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Median Island Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. 20. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: East Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check Printed: 5/5/2016 w v.CityofRC.us E—K265 Page 5 of 16 Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE MODIAS Y9ftd..MW%PP9 v T9 Y99IiR PRO d€= Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shalt be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 22. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Printed: 5/5/2016 ��v.CityofnC.us Page 6 of 18 E—K266 Project #: Project Name: Location: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Foothill & East -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE �j4Bralir7iA PPI Y T9—vn f10 plan wan Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 23.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Activity Centers Botanical Name - Lagerstroemia hybrid Common Name - Lavender Crape Myrtle Hybrid Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Triangular Spacing Size - 24" Box Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Printed: 515/2016 www.CityofRC.us E—K267 Page 7 of 18 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9U.3-5:4R,1n➢� &M-0— % PRbY T8 Y-o- up? PRod€6T: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24, Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines anc legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on 1 plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on public landscape plans are required, tree installation in landscape improvement plans. I standards as follows. The completed he title page of the street improvement within the construction legend stating: Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where those areas shall be per the public Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers - Accent Tree Botanical Name - Prunus blireiana Common Name - NCN Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Informal Groupings, not more than 25% of total frontage trees Size - 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 25.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers (Preferred Tree Species) Botanical Name - Platanus acerifolia Common Name - London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space - 7' Spacing - 40' O.C. Informal Groupings Size - 15 Gallon Printed: 5/5/2016 w .CityorRC.us Page 8 of 18 E-K268 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: --- 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE PU-0-RiAIJQ° 11212-v TES-Y'9"C P-P9 EGT' Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 26. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers (Acceptable Species) Botanical Name - Platanus racemosa Common Name - California Sycamore Min. Grow Space - 8' Spacing - 50' O.C. Informal Groupings Size - 15 Gallon 27.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shal€ include a lane item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. East Avenue Botanical Name - Eucalyptus cladocalyx Common Name - Sugar Gum Min. Grow Space - 6' Spacing - 40' O.C. Size - 15 Gallon 28.Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 29. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master PlanNisual Improvement Plan: Foothill Boulevard 30. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 31. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to Final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Printed: 5/5/2616 Ymv.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 18 E—K269 Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE RBOraSAM R{9rR 7L� oar�v-r9-`��f P RF2d�GT Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 32. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 33. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards, Easements shall be provided as required. 34. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 35. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the rase of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 36. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 37. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way: Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Gas Company and Cucamonga Valley Water District. 38. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 39. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval Printed: 5,'5I2016 VAv .CtyotRC.us E—K270 Page 10 of 18 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE Pf4BiaP'� lWX%130,y 70.yg1AR i4.R2d€ST Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The current edition California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm Standard 9-3 require the fire alarm/fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. 2. Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. 3. The amount of parking provided and any alternative solution to mitigate deficiencies from establish parking regulations must be approved by the planning department after consultation with the Fire Marshal. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Submit hvo sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW (S). i. The structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with current edition of NFPA. Printed: 51512016 w .CityofRC.us Page 11 of 18 E—K271 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: — - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL GF THE M-=aP,'i4filnJ��"RR6Y TG-Y9EI 12.1149d€CT; Building and SafetV Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Provide draft stops incombustible attics and concealed spaces, in accordance with CBC. 8. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls when required. 9. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. 10. Fire resistive construction of the multi -family dwellings shall be in accordance with the CBC. 11. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistive construction. 12. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 13. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance wrath CBC. 14. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturers "high wind" instructions. 15. Project shall comply with the accessibility requirements the current edition of the California Building Code 16. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 17. Construction activity shall only occur in accordance with the times noted in Chapter 17.66 050 D-4 of the Development Code, 18. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 19. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval. 20. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 21, Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. �wrw.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/5@01'a page 12 of 18 E—K272 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE reMEZ1AZO- tM&M0- Y T-A Y-9I rR PRO fr=cT- Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approvaf 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. The drainage analysis shall include all upstream off -site storm water flows. Off -site storm water flows may be analyzed using AMCII, 25-year storm event criteria. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code, 12. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. vnrnv_CityofRC.us Printed: 5151201"0 Page 13 of 18 E—K273 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Location: Foothill & East -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE IV E52Z ';4„W- � 6A&M1P.1!2LY TA—Y061.9 PROa€sT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 15. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 16. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 17. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 18. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 19. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout `Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting, The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. Printed: 5/5/2015 vrms.C'fyofRC.us Page 14 of 18 E—K274 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE PE-2-0r�if1Q14° °lzLY TA YANG' ��9d�ST Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 23. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 24. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 25. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide both legal and physical access to the Cucamonga Valley Water District property along the north boundary of the project. The legal access shall be shown an either the Final Map or by a separate instrument. The physical access shall be shown on the precise grading and drainage plan. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 28. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 29. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 30. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 31. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off -site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. Printed: 515/2016 w ZityofRcros Page 15 of 18 E—K275 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE ga-5-51M%Apf Y TO `�B6f�' 4�9dSET Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 33. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 31ps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 34. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 35. This project is conditioned to accept all upstream off -site storm water flows onto this project site to be routed, through the project site to a storm drain system. 36. This project shall provide legal and physical to the property along the northerly property line owned by Cucamonga Valley Water District. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjoining property owner(s) allowing grading on the adjacent property(ies). 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide correspondence from the gas company noting the gas company has review the proposed improvements over the gas company easement and that the gas company does not have any further comments regarding said improvements over the gas easement. 39. The land owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 40. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 41. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 42. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. Printed: 5/3/2016 N""V.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 18 E-K276 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE PUZZ„t�i��e-eN� Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 43. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 45. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. 46. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 47. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 48. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. Printed: 515/2016 WMv.cflyotRc.us notarized letter from The letter shall be on either the title Page 17 of 16 E—K277 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE RUP0- AY�89_0_ ePLY T-9 Yt klR Q R Q__f€6T: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 49. The subject project, shall accept all existing off -site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off -site storm water drainage flows mix with any on -site storm water drainage flows, then the off -site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on -site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. Printed: 6/6/2016 vrrnv.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 18 E—K278 RESOLUTION NO. 16-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2015-00318, A REQUEST FOR A UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 190-UNIT MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR 3,246 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE TO SUPPORT FUTURE MASS TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES ON A PROJECT SITE WITHIN THE MIXED USE (MU) ZONING DISTRICT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN'S: 1100-201-03, 04 AND 07. A. Recitals 1. Foothill and East, LLC filed an application for the approval of Uniform Sign Program DRC2015-00318, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Uniform Sign Program request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of April 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to May 11, 2016. 3. On the 11th day of May 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearings of April 27, 2016 and continued to May 11, 2016, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site is made up of three (3) parcels totaling 8.8 gross acres of land located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; and b. The site is vacant with a water pumping facility operated by the Cucamonga Valley Water District near the northwest corner of the project site and a grove of Eucalyptus trees that were planted prior to 1938 and were historically used as a wood lot; and C. The site is bounded by vacant land to the north in the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district; by a multi -family development to the south in the Medium (M) Development District; by a flood control facility and single-family residences in the City of Fontana to the east; and, by utility easements to the west in the Open Space (OP) District; and d. The development consists of 190 units including 69 one bedroom units (769 - 774 square feet), 107 two bedroom units (1,068 — 1,322 square feet), 14 three bedroom units (1,352 square feet) and 3,246 square feet of commercial tenant space; and E—K279 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-30 DRC2015-00318 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC MAY 11, 2016 Page 2 e. The applicant is requesting a Uniform Sign Program (DRC2015-00318) for the project providing text and illustrations for the proposed project monumentation (La Mirage on Route 66), for the overall project and for the wall signs for the potential commercial units. A monument sign is proposed at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue honoring "Historic Route 66" and includes the City's name and logo. All signs conform to the Code for both size and quantity. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Uniform Sign Program is consistent with the development standards for signs as provided in Chapter 17.74 (Sign Regulations for Private Property). The proposed signage complies with all related Development Code sign regulation; and b. The design, location, and scale of proposed signs for the integrated development are in keeping with the architectural character of the development. The signs are designed to complement the proposed mixed use development including size and scale. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's E—K280 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-30 DRC2015-00318 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC MAY 11, 2016 Page 3 recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannina Department 1) Approval is for a Uniform Sign Program related to the development of a 190- unit mixed use development with 3,246 square feet of commercial space located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue; APN's: 1100-201-03, 04 and 07. 2) The approval of DRC2015-00318 is subject to approval by the City Council of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-01132 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-01131, to change land use designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). 3) The approval is also subject to Planning Commission approval of Development Review DRC2014-01130, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19945, Minor Exception DRC2016-00169 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014- 01134. 4) Approval is contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L".0 ATTEST: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary E—K281 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-30 DRC2015-00318 — FOOTHILL AND EAST, LLC MAY 11, 2016 Page 4 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of May 2016, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E—K282 44Conditions of Approval 'AnfnNca Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE ��000-114 0 Y y l �Y To yOUR pp0jECT Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 4. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 6. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 7. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. Printed: 5/5/2M w .CityofRC.us E—K283 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE FOR EinilA"n- M-- - - >Mu� r %PP—f Y TO Y-0I I.Q 9zI�Ad€ST' Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following special Conditions 1. Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided" standards from Cornwall Avenue to East Avenue, as required and including: a. Provide curb, gutter, a,c. pavement, sidewalk, street trees (along development frontage only), 9500 Lumens HPSV-equivalent LED street lights, commercial drive approaches, access ramps at intersections, R26(s) "No Stopping" signs and asphalt pavement, on the north side. Join existing improvements installed as part of Tract 16882. b. Provide 47 feet of travel way from street centerline to north curb face, except at bus bay (additional 11 feet). c. Provide a westbound bus bay/right turn lane for easterly driveway. d. Revise traffic signing and striping, as required. e. Dedication shall be made on Foothill Boulevard, a minimum of 60 feet, measured from street centerline. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along bus bay, to provide a minimum of 8 feet measured from the face of the curb. f. Proposed bus shelter shall be constructed outside the public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained. g. Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover costs of permanent offsite improvements from future developer of the adjacent property, west of the centerline of the combined easements for MWD, SCE and the Gas Company to the west and east of the east site boundary. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. h. No median breaks allowed in Foothill Boulevard median. i. Extend eastbound left turn pocket to total of 350 in storage length. j. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. Printed: 5/5/2016 NPNW.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 18 E—K284 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE daJ'I v T^ Y96fP pRa f€CT Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. East Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City 'Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way and provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees and 9500 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights and commercial drive approach. b. Provide 32 feet of travel way from centerline to west curb face. c. Driveway to be in accordance with City Driveway Policy. The distance from the signalized intersection shall be measured from BCR to near edge of driveway to be a minimum of 200 feet. d. Revise traffic signing and striping as required. e. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. 3. Modify existing Traffic Signal at Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed in accordance with the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan including street lights. This VIP designates trees, pedestrian crossings at intersections, featuring colored pavement emblazoned with the Route 66 logo, special sidewalk treatments, artwork and a historic post and a cable roadway safety barrier. Said enhancements within the parkway area shall be maintained by the developer and shall be included in the CC & R's. In addition, refer to Exhibit E of the Visual Improvement Plan for the design and construction of the Entry Monument, date palms and other VIP improvements. 5. Revise Dwg. 2255-D to show proposed lateral and catch basin in Foothill Boulevard and junction structure for private storm drain connection. Also, revise Dwg. 2295-D to show the conversion of the temporary CMP to a standard catch basin in East Avenue. 6. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite east of East Avenue to the first pole offsite west of the westerly project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first. All service utility lines crossing Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded too. The developer cannot request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding, Instead the City shall provide a portion of collected monies from the developer to the south, DRC2006-00540, paid for as an in -lieu fee for future undergrounding of said overhead utilities. a. Relocation of 66KV power poles by Southern California Edison Company if necessary shall be paid for and coordinated by the developer on Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. Printed: 5/5/2016 ww .CityofRC.us Page 3 of td E—K285 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE PUSZidf tit- AMM 12.112-1 Y TA T YOUR P.RBdEGT- Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 7. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of East Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite south of south project boundary to the first pole offsite south of Foothill Boulevard, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first. All service utility lines crossing East Avenue shall be undergrounded too. 8. The development requires installation of fiber optics conduits, vaults and manholes per City Standard Plans 135-137 on Foothill Boulevard. Also, the improvement plans need to show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes using Standard Plans 135-137. 9. Site is located within Area 8 (modified) of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. Development within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Area is responsible for the City's adopted drainage fee (master plan and regional) as well as reimbursement to other development, or the City, for oversizing of local drainage facilities as determined by the City Engineer. City fees shall be paid prior to first building permit. a. For the Middle Etiwanda Drainage Area, the Master Plan drainage fee is $ 32,199.00 per net acre. Fees are subject to periodic review and increase. b. For Drainage Area 8, the Regional Mainline drainage fee is $ 7,800.00 and there is no Secondary Regional Fee. Fees are subject to periodic review and increase. 10. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way, prior to issuance of building permits: Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Gas Company and Cucamonga Valley Water District. a. Provide Cucamonga Valley Water District access to their property as well as Southern California Edison Company and Southern California Gas Company. 11. An in -lieu fee for one-fourth the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill/East Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. 12. The final Tract Map has to be approved and recorded prior to issuance of building permits. Standard Conditions of Approval 13, Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard 44 total feet on East Avenue 14. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Printed: 5/5/2016 www.CftyofRC.us Page 4 of 16 E—K286 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE .9Z2H J a %RRgy Tg ygirp paRaa€6T Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. 16. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 17. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. 18. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Foothill Boulevard Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Curvilinear Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Median Island Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. and overlays will be determined during plan check. 20. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: East Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check Pfinted: 5/5/2016 w .CityofRcros (b) Pavement reconstruction Page 5 of 18 E—K287 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00313, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9RUaF{';;�W V_ &-AX8WU€-YTO—YOUR PROJRITT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 22. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Printed: 515/2016 w .CtyofRC.us Page 6 of 16 0 Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9F4�NEZI ASUMA4Pi NPR-1Y TA-`AEI9R -FAd€6T Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Activity Centers Botanical Name - Lagerstroemia hybrid Common Name - Lavender Crape Myrtle Hybrid Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Triangular Spacing Size - 24" Box Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Printed: 515/2016 WNW.CityoiRc.us shall be furnished to the backfill soil amendments, the Engineering Services Page 7 of 18 E—K289 Project #: Project Name: Location: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Foothill & East -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE �FP{3iaA'" �y RP<Y To Y-oyR plim- JE T Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation _ in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers - Accent Tree Botanical Name - Prunus blireiana Common Name - NCN Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Informal Groupings, not more than 25% of total frontage trees Size - 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector, 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 25. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers (Preferred Tree Species) Botanical Name - Platanus acerifolia Common Name - London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space - 7' Spacing - 40' O.C. Informal Groupings Size - 15 Gallon Printed: 515/2016 vnwr.CityotRC.us Page a of 18 E—K290 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 1.10020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE U14s4,,, �l�ng�y_Fy�2ElQ faoA��GT Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 26.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Centers (Acceptable Species) Botanical Name - Platanus racemosa Common Name - California Sycamore Min. Grow Space - 8' Spacing - 50' O.C. Informal Groupings Size - 15 Gallon 27.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. East Avenue Botanical Name - Eucalyptus cladocalyx Common Name - Sugar Gum Min. Grow Space - 6' Spacing - 40' O.C. Size - 15 Gallon 28, Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 29. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master PlanNisual Improvement Plan: Foothill Boulevard 30. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 31. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Printed: 515/2016 MVW.CityofRc.us Page 9 of 16 E-K291 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE 9136 R''4WRftA ° ` ` PRAY . —`Q- PF 0J.C:GT_. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 32. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 33. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 34. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 35. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 36. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 37. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way: SQuthem California Edison Company, Southern California Gas Company and Cucamonga Valley Water District. 38. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 39. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval Printed: 5/512016 YA=.Ci'yofRC.us Page 10 of 18 E—K292 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE WPZf"79 q� W' n �z�y T9—? SNP 13P9 r€ST Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit standard Conditions of Approval 1. The current edition California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm Standard 9-3 require the fire alarm/fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. 2. Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. 3. The amount of parking provided and any alternative solution to mitigate deficiencies from establish parking regulations must be approved by the planning department after consultation with the Fire Marshal. Building and Safety Services Department itandard Conditions of Approval 1. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW (S). The structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with current edition of NFPA. Pnn[ed: 5/5/2016 "N.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 18 E-K293 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Reviews, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE M-50f4W I %PP-Ly 1:9 4, Eg&yPRc)rf€r_T Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Provide draft stops incombustible attics and concealed spaces, in accordance with CBC. 8. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls when required. 9. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. 10. Fire resistive construction of the multi -family dwellings shall be in accordance with the CBC. 11. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistive construction. 12. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 13. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 14. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's 'highwind" instructions. 15. Project shall comply with the accessibility requirements the current edition of the California Building Code 16. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 17. Construction activity shall only occur in accordance with the times noted in Chapter 17.66 050 D-4 of the Development Code. 18. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 19. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval. 20. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 21. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan (s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. Printed: 51512016 we .CityofRC.us Page 12 of 18 E—K294 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE �K'6�1fir414/i{9PrRI� LY Tynr ro RA�Ad€�T Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. S. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. The drainage analysis shall include all upstream off -site storm water flows. Off -site storm water flows may be analyzed using AMCII, 25-year storm event criteria. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11 P' rior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 12. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. Printed: 51512015 www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 18 E-K295 Project #: Project Name: Location: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRG2016-00169 Foothill & East -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE PERM- 14 _ W ARF ::9 T-9 Y-01f.R ARQ_9RST' Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 15. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 16. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 17. The final grading and drainage plan shaft show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 18. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Of iciaL 19. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 20. Prior to issuance of 'a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shell call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civii Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. Printed: 5/5/2016 WXW.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 18 E—K296 Project #: Project Name SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE FF4Riaf5'r,�iR,... -..- %.Pp-1 Y To Y-06lo ooAdcrT Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 23. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 24. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 25. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide both legal and physical access to the Cucamonga Valley Water District property along the north boundary of the project. The legal access shall be shown on either the Final Map or by a separate instrument. The physical access shall be shown on the precise grading and drainage plan. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga,'s "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 28. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 29. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 30. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 31. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off -site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. Printed: 5/5/2016 Ww .CityofRC.us Page 15 of 16 E—K297 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE �j4 iaR�f I P-ALY T4O YOUP PRQ tf9T Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 33. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 34. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 35. This project is conditioned to accept all upstream off -site storm water flows onto this project site to be routed, through the project site to a storm drain system. 36. This project shall provide legal and physical to the property along the northerly property line owned by Cucamonga Valley Water District. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjoining property owner(s) allowing grading on the adjacent property(ies). 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide correspondence from the gas company noting the gas company has review the proposed improvements over the gas company easement and that the gas company does not have any further comments regarding said improvements over the gas easement. 39. The land owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 40. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 41. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 42. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. Printed: 5/5/2016 mvv1.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 18 E—K298 Project#: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 1100201.03-0000 �rojectType: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE a tf_k�Y T�nr rd i2l�9d€ST Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 43. The final project -specific water quality management p@an (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 45. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet N: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. 46. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 47. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Cade/Residential Code. 48. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. Printed: 5/512016 WMX.cityofRC.us Page 17 of 18 E—K299 Project #: SUBTT19945 CEQA2014-00027, DRC2014-01130, DRC2014-01131, DRC2014-01132, DRC2014-01133, DRC2014-01134, DRC2015-00318, DRC2016-00169 Project Name: Foothill & East Location: -- - 110020103-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Design Review, Development Code Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign ALL OF THE RUE=aFL'; 1R,f�14 �`112PLY TO Y-9O OR PRO EG-T- Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 49. The subject project, shall accept all existing off -site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off -site storm water drainage flows mix with any on -site storm water drainage flows, then the off -site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on -site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. Printed: 5/5/2016 vnvw.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 18 E-K300