The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2018-02-14 - Agenda Packet Supplemental - PC-HPCPLANNING & HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONS TENTATIVE AGENDA FOR FEBRUARY 14, 2018 Last circulated 12/14; 12/20; 1/17 ENV LEGAL SCHEDULED _1/8_/SENT_1/9 - confirmed-1/9 10-DAY LEGAL SCHEDULED-1/22 /SENT_1/22 - confirmed- 1/22-NOTE TO PLANNERS: THIS AGENDA REFLECTS RECENT CHANGES IN OUR PROCEDURES AND NOTICING WITH RESPECT TO INITIAL STUDIES AND CEQA RULES REGARDING THE PROCESSING OF NOI'S THROUGH THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE. SEE BELOW FOR SPECIFIC DATES FOR THE SPECIFIC MILESTONES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE DATES ARE STRUCTURED TO ALLOW TIME TO REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND TO PROVIDE A 30-DAY NOTICING PERIOD PLUS MAILING TIME. SOME EXCEPTIONS MAY APPLY. CEQA AB52 COMPLIANCE =,(APPLIES, TO: ALL EIRs with NOPs and NDs or MNDs with_a nonce to adopt;fled on or after July t. 2015), Obtain Cultural Resources Kgport b"raft tribal'notification letter within 14 days of deeming the application complete. Submit letter. to clericai and include list of tribes to contact. Note: This -notice givesia project description and map and. offers the option.to consult!-- _m :� r - " ---, f rbe(s)`must respond witlreia requesf to. consult within 30 days of! the receipt of� riotice requesting consultation. Note: Allow 36 aysfrom original mailing tlate. Lead agencies must begin, consultation process within 30.days of receiving a request for consultation,fromz tribe! __ P _r _ _ _ _ , _,.____t__ Draft ElRssand propo"sed,ND's ;aptl MNDs cannot be released for circulation •prior to_consultation being completed and tribal acceptance of mitigation measures ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: Studies are due for Sr. Staff review (Donald or Mike) Wednesday, December 6 (ABOUT 55 DAYS PRIOR TO CLOSE DATE -SEE FILING SCHEDULE). Studies due to clerical December 13 (at least 40 days prior to close date); Mailout on Monday, January 8 (at least 35 days prior to close date). LABELS: For Environmental items - Due to Lois Wednesday, December 21 because ofthe holidays (1 week plus 3 days prior to mailout) For Regular 10-Day items - Due to Lois Monday, January 15 1 week prior to mailout NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING: For Environmental items - To the paper on Monday, January 8 (at least 35 days prior to meeting) publish on Thursday, December 21) For Regular 10-Day items -To the paper on Monday, January 22 (at least 13 days prior to meeting) (publish on January 11 MAILERS: For Environmental items - Go out Monday, January 8 (same as 30-daynewspaper ad) For Regular 10-Day items - Go out Monday, January 22 same as 10-daynewspaper ad PLANNING & HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONS TENTATIVE AGENDA FOR FEBRUARY 14, 2018 Last circulated 12/14; 12/20; 1/17 POSTINGS: (ALWAYS ON WEDNESDAY) For Environmental items — Go out Wednesday, January 10 (at least 30 days prior to meeting) For Regular 10-Day items — Go out Wednesday, January 24 at least 10 days prior to meeting) REPORT DUE DATES: (THESE BENCHMARKS ALL FALL ON MONDAYS) All draft reports (with attachments) to Senior Planner no later than 6:00 p.m. MONDAY, January 15(3 +weeks prior to mtg date). All reviewed draft reports to clerical no later than 6:00 p.m. MONDAY, January 22. All final reports to Lois for review prior to Planning Director signature MONDAY, January 29. AggNDA PRODUCTIONWILL BEGII*9 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9 HPC AND PC CONSENT CALENDAR Approval of Minutes dated ************** HPC AND PC ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS HPC Directors Reports HPC Scheduled Matters PC Public Hearings Dominick ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00084 — DEDEAUX PROPERTIES LLC —A proposal to construct a 56,560-square foot commercial Rev desc 1110 trucking, facility for office, storage, freight handling, shipping and trucking services on an 11.82 acre site located within the Heavy Industrial (HI) District at the northwest corner of Env study received the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railway and Etiwanda Avenue at 6822 and 8768 on mail out Etiwanda Avenue - APNs: 0229-131-15, 16 and 26. The project includes a request to date/clerical remove thirty-two (32) trees with the development of the site. A Mitigated Negative consistency & Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. cursory review only �2 Rpt to clericaG /6 Signed, E/8 Nikki TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00901 - JAIME CAMPOS - A request for a one (1) year time _v extension for a previously approved Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM18626) to subdivide a property of 0.63-acre into three 3 lots in the Low L Residential District located at the PLANNING &'HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONS TENTATIVE AGENDA FOR FEBRUARY 14, 2018 Last circulated 12/14; 12/20; 1/17 Snd`2 p1 Rpf to eleK cyaft21 southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Day Lily Court at 9923 Lemon Avenue - APN: 0201-902-16. This action is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions. Tabe TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00922 — YOULITA AND KIRYAKOS, LLC. - A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map Rpt to CB for sig on (SUBTT18823) to subdivide 3 parcels of land totaling 12.93 acres into 19 lots for the future 1/11 rev 1118 development of single-family residences in the Very Low (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Wardman Bullock 18-03; 18-04; 18-05 Road, south and east of Blue Sky Court - APN: 0226-081-15, 16 and 17. Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823, Variance 'DRC2012-00135 .and Minor Exception P CIA DRC2012-00513. On January 23, 2013, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission.for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823. p rev *5'& s_1 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the project within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00952 — YOULITA AND KIRYAKOS, LLC. - A request to allow for a two (2) year time extension of a previously approved Variance (DRC2012- 00135) to reduce the minimum lot depth from 150 feet to'124 feet on Lot #9 of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 in the Very Low (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (A to 2 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road, south and east of Blue Sky Court - APN: 0226-081-15, 16 and 17. Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823, Variance DRC2012-00135 and Minor Exception DRC2012-00513. On January 23, 2013, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the project within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. TIME ,EXTENSION DRC2017-00951 — YOULITA AND KIRYAKOS, LLC. - A request to allow for a two (2) year time extension of a previously approved Minor Exception (DRC2012-00513) to allow for up to 8 - foot high perimeter walls on Lots #1,, #9 and #10 of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 in the Very Low (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (A to 2 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road, south and east of Blue Sky Court.- APN: 0226-081-15, 16 and 17..Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823, Variance DRC2012-00135 and Minor Exception DRC202-00513. On January 23, 2013, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the project within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Tabe HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00604—AARON SEMLER-A requestforsite plan and architectural review of a 3,778-square foot single-family residence ona 23,320-square Rpt to CB 1/18 foot lot on the south side of Camino Predera in the Hillside Overlay District of the Low (L) District 2-4 dwelling units peracre -APN: 0207-641-04. The project qualifies as a Class PLANNING & HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONS TENTATIVE AGENDA FOR FEBRUARY 14, 2018 Last circulated 12/14; 12/20; 1/17 18-06 put last on 3 exemption under Section 15303, of the California Environmental Quality Act, which agenda per TVZ permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. b6 �pt�rev & signeii;315/5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commission Comments/Concerns WORKSHOP MAM PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00960 — LEWIS MANAGEMENT CORP. - A Apt to clerical on 218 request for a Pre -Application Review of the features and open space amenities within and along The Resort Parkway (formerly The Vine), a public street pending construction within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues. The specific location of the project site is length of The Resort Parkway that will be located between 4th and 6th Streets. Conditions of Approval Ijnnctto Community Development Department CucAMONCA Project#: DRC2017-00922 DRC2017-00951, DRC2017-00952 Project Name: Time Extension for SUBTT18823 Location: -- - 022608116-0000 Project Type: Time Extension Time Extension, Time Extension ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Comply with all existing conditions of approval per SUBTT18823. 2. New street lights shall be owned by the City. The developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. Street lights for local and collector streets are now 3600lumen LED. Street light plans must be submitted to Engineering for approval. Standard Conditions of Approval 3. An improvement security per section 66499 of the Subdivision Map Act shall be required prior to final map recordation, accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Printed: 2/14/2018 w w.CityofRC.us D3 - D.S Project#: DRC2017-00922 DRC2017-00951, DRC2017-00952 Project Name: Time Extension for SUBTT18823 Location: -- - 022608116-0000 Project Type: Time Extension Time Extension, Time Extension ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. C. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77], areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes, fleet storage areas, nurseries, or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78) repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed: 2/14/2018 `h w.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 7 Project#: DRC2017-00922 DRC2017-00951, DRC2017-00952 Project Name: Time Extension for SUBTT18823 Location: — - 022608116-0000 Project Type: Time Extension Time Extension, Time Extension ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 3. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 4. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 12. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 13. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. Printed: 2/14/2018 w w.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 7 Project #: DRC2017-00922 DRC2017-00951, DRC2017-00952 Project Name: Time Extension for SUBTT18823 Location: -- - 022608116-0000 Project Type: Time Extension Time, Extension, Time Extension ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 15. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 16. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 17. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 18.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 19. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 2114/2078 Page 4 of 7 Project#: DRC2017-00922 DRC2017-00951, DRC2017-00952 Project Name: Time Extension for SUBTT18823 Location: -- - 022608116-0000 Project Type: Time Extension Time Extension, Time Extension ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off -site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the =% drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) .the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. 21. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 23. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 24. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 25. The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not allow on -site storm water quality treatment BMP devices within the individual single-family lots which will be required to be inspected and maintained by each individual homeowner. As a condition of approval for this single-family residential project (including tentative tract maps and parcel maps, and final tract maps and parcel maps of 2lots/parcels or more) a common storm water treatment system(s) will be required which shall be maintained by a homeowners' association prior to the approval of a water quality management plan and issuance of a grading permit. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. Printed: 2/14/2018 wN/'n'.CltyofRC.us Page 5 of 7 Project#: DRC2017-00922 DRC2017-00951, DRC2017-00952 Project Name: Time Extension for SUBTT18823 Location: Project Type: — - 022608116-0000 Time Extension Time Extension, Time Extension ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device,, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 29. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 30. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 31. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 32. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 33. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 34. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 2/14/2618 Page 6 of 7 Project#: DRC2017-00922 DRC2017-00951, DRC2017-00952 Project Name: Time Extension for SUBTT18823 Location: -- - 022608116-0000 Project Type: Time Extension Time Extension, Time Extension ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 37. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 38. The subject project, shall accept all existing off -site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off -site storm water drainage flows mix with any on -site storm water drainage flows, then the off -site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on -site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 39. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 40. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 41. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, or recording of the final map, the applicant shall prepare a storm water quality management plan (WQMP) meeting the requirements of the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) permit. The WQMP shall be approved by the City Engineer, or his designee, and recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit and/or recordation of the final map. wrvw.CityofRC.us Printed: 2n4/2018 Page 7 of 7 a Matthew Rodriquez Secretary for Environmental Protection Aee,c,,e 6V7 Department of Toxic Substances Control February 14, 2018 Barbara A. Lee, Director 5796 Corporate Avenue Cypress, California 90630 Mr. Dominick Perez Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dominick. Perez(o)citvofrc. us Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00084 AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2017-00800, SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVE AND WHITTRAM AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (SCH# 2018011027) Dear Mr. Perez: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has reviewed the subject Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The proposed project evaluated in the MND consists of: construction of a 56,560-square foot commercial trucking on an 11.82-acre site by the City of Rancho Cucamonga (project proponent). The project will include the construction of parking and landscaped area, street improvements for the remaining unimproved portion of Etiwanda Avenue that abuts the project site, and utility and circulation improvements. The existing materials recovery facility and associated improvements will be removed. Based on the review of the MND, DTSC has the following comments: Section 1.1.4 of the included Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report (Phase 1) states, "The Historical UST and the SWEEPS UST database states the subject property has a 9, 940-gallon diesel UST that was installed in 1980, one 555-gallon regular gasoline UST installed in 1972, and a 1,000-gallon unleaded gasoline UST that was installed in 1972. Due to the date of installation and duration that the US Ts operated at the subject property, the possibility exists that undetected releases may have occurred. Therefore, the USTs represent a REC to the subject property." The Phase I further states, "PSI identified one 1,000- gallon diesel AST, one 1, 500-gallon diesel AST, one 250-gallon motor oil AST, three 250-gallon waste gasoline ASTs, one 250-gallon used oil AST, one 250- gallon antifreeze AST, 2 trash bins with solid oil waste, numerous 5-gallon buckets of coolant, numerous oxygen cylinders, and numerous propane >D -2— Mr. Dominick Perez February 14, 2018 Page 2 cylinders. Numerous drums and waste dumpsters were identified at the property, which contained scrap metal and other recyclable materials. The ASTs were located on secondary containment. The ASTs, buckets, containers, and cylinders appeared to be in good condition and no evidence of a release was identified. Based on our observations, the presence of these materials does not represent a REC to the subject property." In addition, Section 6.1.2 of the Phase I indicates that several adjoining properties contain USTs onsite. Indicate whether current and historical onsite USTs and offsite USTs have resulted in groundwater contamination. If groundwater is impacted, then evaluate the potential for vapor intrusion onsite associated with groundwater contamination. Section 7.1.1 of the included Phase I states, "PSI observed an aboveground clarifier located on the southern portion of the subject property." DTSC recommends evaluation of soil and soil gas within the clarifier area. 3. Section 7.1.1 of the included Phase I states, "PSI identified two pad -mounted electrical transformers located on the subject property." DTSC recommends evaluation, proper investigation and mitigation, if necessary, of onsite areas with current or historic PCB -containing transformers. 4. Section 7.1.1 of the included Phase I states, "PSI observed one aboveground hydraulic lift on the subject property." DTSC recommends evaluation, proper investigation and mitigation, if necessary, of the hydraulic lift area. 5. Section 7.2 of the included Phase I states, "Aerial photographs and topographic maps depict the subject property as land cultivated for agricultural use, a railroad is located on the southern portion of the property and a single-family residence is located on the northeastern portion of the property." If the site was used for agricultural or related activities, residual pesticides may be present in onsite soil. DTSC recommends investigation and mitigation, as necessary, to address potential impact to human health and environment from residual pesticides. Railroad easements and rail yards are commonly impacted due to spillage of chemicals, fuels, and lubricants, and use of pesticides and herbicides along the tracks for weed control. DTSC recommends assessment/investigation and/or cleanup as necessary to confirm that no residual contamination associated with rail operation is present onsite. In addition, based on historical residential site use, DTSC recommends investigation to address potential impact to human health and environment from residual termiticide application and lead -based paint. 6. If during construction/demolition of the project, soil and/or groundwater contamination is suspected, construction/demolition in the area would cease and appropriate health and safety procedures should be implemented. If it is determined that contaminated soil and/or groundwater exist, the IS should identify how any required investigation and/or remediation will be conducted, and the appropriate government agency to provide regulatory oversight. Mr. Dominick Perez February 14, 2018 Page 3 7. If soil contamination is suspected or observed in the project area, then excavated soil should be sampled prior to export/disposal. If the soil is contaminated, it should be disposed of properly in accordance with all applicable and relevant laws and regulations. In addition, if the project proposes to import soil to backfill the excavated areas, proper evaluation and/or sampling should be conducted to make sure that the imported soil is free of contamination. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at (714) 484-5324 or by email at Ivy. Osornio(c?dtsc.ca.gov, Sincerely, Ivy Osornio Project Manager Site Mitigation and Restoration Program kl/io cc: (via e-mail) Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, California 95812-3044 State clearinghouseOopr ca gov Mr. Dave Kereazis Office of Planning & Environmental Analysis Department of Toxic Substances Control Dave. Kereazisadtsc ca gov Mr. Shahir Haddad, Chief Brownfields Restoration and School Evaluation Branch Site Mitigation and Restoration Program - Cypress Shahir. Haddad (&dtsc.ca.gov CEQA# 2018011027 Planning Commission February 14, 2018 Applicant YOULITAAND KIRYAKOS, LLC. Project Description TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00922 - A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT18823) and related cases to subdivide 3 parcels of land totaling 12.93 acres into 19 lots for the future development of single-family residences iJ,,� 'D3- D!7 Project Overview • The original project was approved on January 23, 2013, for a 19 lot subdivision of 12.93 acres of land for the future development of 19 single-family residences • Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823, Variance DRC2012-00135 and Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 were set to expire on January 23, 2018 • Applicant Requests- -One (1) year time extension of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 -Two (2) year time extension of Variance DRC2012-00135 and Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 • The new expiration date for SUBTT18823 will be January 23, 2019 • The new expiration date for Variance DRC2012-00135 and Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 will be January 23, 2020 • The time extension is necessary resolve outstanding engineering issues ,;. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval Overview Tentative Tract Map Approval Approval Expiration Approval/Extension Type Period Date Date Original Approval 3 Years Automatic Extension 2 Years Time Extension DRC2017- 00922 1 Year I Variance DRC2012-00135_and Minor 01 /23/13 01 /23/16 01 /23/18 (Proposed) (Proposed) 01/24/18 01/23/19 Approval Approval Approval/Extension Type Period Date Original Approval 5Years 01/23/13 (Proposed) Time Extension DRC2017-00951 & (Proposed) DRC2017-00952 2 Years 01/24/18 Expiration Date 01 /23/18 (Proposed) 01 /23/20 w i lf' 4 .19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT18823 • 19 Lot subdivision on 12.93 acres of land • Lots #12 and #15 have unfinished residences on them • Three existing residences on the north side of Blue Sky Court are not part of the subject subdivision Variance • To reduce the lot depth for Lot 9 by 26 feet to allow Lot 9 to have a 124-foot lot depth • Required interior lot dimensions are 90 feet wide and 150 feet deep • Lot #9 is 197 feet wide and 124 feet deep and has a total lot area of 26,604 square feet Minor Exception • To increase the north property line wall height on Lot #1 for fire protection purposes • To increase the south property line wall height on Lots #9 and #10 due to a grade change between the project site on the subdivision to the south Gl[N )LlE ^iVl IOW. i Environmental Review • Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted on January 23, 2013, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 • CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, states that no subsequent or supplemental review is necessary if the scope of the project has not changed from that considered as part of the original CEQA review Staff Recommendation • Approve Time Extension DRC2017-00922 for a one (1) year Time Extension of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 • Approve Time Extension DRC2017-00952 for two (2) year Time Extension of Variance DRC2012-00135 • Approve Time Extension DRC2017-00951 for a two (2) year Time Extension of Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 Planning Commission February 14, 2018 Semler Residence ■� -----, Jf--" D (� Project Overview • Entitlement: Hillside Design Review • Request: Design review of a three -level 3,778 square foot single-family residence • Lot Size: 23,320 square feet • Zoning and General Plan Designations: Low (L) District • Lot Dimensions: North Property Line — 66 feet East Property Line — 227 feet West Property Line — 243 feet South Property Line — 135 feet im Aerial Photo ,.',+ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Y C_ J H Aqq�p 7� . . . �. •^4 ,mil 1� � r �' � i r' d 'r4 C sr` ; - �' -, "£+°a Arl § a� *� � ' y d v � /�� \ � - �l . ± � 2�§ \� ` ~ � � \ .\ \«� � . � � � �/ \ { \ \ »9 = � � K :<- �/\\: ( f �°��/\« %� � »�� \ «}� � �� Site Plan Top Level 1,235 SF - it 1 i f 4 1 L 1 � n " ` 1 \\\ 1 E } I N.VALE F595 S j 1 OMW 948 SF I Middle Level 1,595 SF Lower Level Roof Plan CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Side Elevation (East) NJ "I. LEI RENEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Rear Elevation (south) Building Envelope (North -South) SECTION F F SCALE 1 INCH $ FT I EWSTING GRACE Bs/ _____ �-._•' i -- - -------------- ROOF 1330.57 • >m v , Fr 1321 4 rx 1 I I I 1 I 1 Y 1 - ! ' j acre 1� Ip IA9 1 FI pNAASh^-ECCD -x �T I= t= Building Envelope (East-West) Grading Plan °., JA Landscape Plan ♦1 Code Compliance • Lot Coverage: 11 percent (40 percent maximum) • Building Height: just over 29 feet (30 feet maximum) • Front Setback: 33 feet (minimum 37 plus -or -minus 5 required) • Side Setbacks: 8'-9" and 20 feet (minimum 5 and 10 feet required) • Rear Setback: 144 feet (minimum 20 feet required) Grading • Cut/Fill: 158 cubic yards of export • Maximum Cut: 9 feet (to create stepped foundation) • Maximum Retaining Wall Height: 4 feet • Foundation: Stepped with upper pad at 1,310 feet and lower pad at 1,301 feet • Rear Yard Grading: Limited to 18-foot patio and pool (remainder of yard left mostly undisturbed) View Analysis • Development Code does not include a view preservation ordinance • Residence is designed to limit view obstructions as seen from Camino Predera • Maximum building height of just over 8 feet as seen from curb face • Flat roof design • Two -car garage at street level • Cable railings to reduce view obstructions • Increased side yard setbacks Neighborhood Meeting • Meeting held on August 17, 2017 • Approximately 20 persons in attendance • Questions raised about the height of the structure and retaining walls, the size of the residence, the earth work quantities and landscaping • The overarching concern raised was the potential view loss created by the height and size of the proposed residence • The existing residents stated that their concerns were driven by the residences constructed along Camino Predera over the last 15 years, which they feel were not in keeping with the intent of the Hillside Overlay District and with the older residences in the area Conclusions • Project conforms with the Development Code and the Hillside Design Standards and Guidelines • Building is well designed and carries the design theme to all elevations • Grading design balances the requirement to reduce cut and fill and to limit view obstructions • Residence is stepped with the existing grade • Height of the structure limited to just over 8 feet above the curb face on Camino Predera • Does not require Variances or Minor Exceptions and the size is in keeping with the more recent residences constructed along Camino Predera • Approve 00604 Recommendations Hillside Development Review DRC2015- Adopt the related Resolution of Approval with attached Conditions of Approval Planning Commission February 14, 2018 Applicant Jaime Campos, Property Owner Project Description Time Extension DRC2017-00901 — A request for a one (1) year time extension for previously approved Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM18626) to subdivide a property of 0.63-acre into three (3) lots in the Low (L) Residential District located at the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Day Lily Court at 9923 Lemon Avenue - APN: 0201-902-16. Z4-C'VL'I 1) i Aerial Photo Project Site 3 Background and General Information Tentative Parcel Iolap 18626 Approval Expiration Approving Authority Approval/Extension Tv e Period Approval Date Date Planning Initial Approval Commission (PC Reso 11-01) 3 Years Jan 12, 2011 Jan 13, 2014 Assembly Bill 116 Automatic Extension 2 Years Jan 13. 2014 Jan 13, 2016 Time Extension Planning DRC2016-01009 Commission PC Reso 16-06 1 Year Feb 10 2016 Jan 13 2017 Time Extension Planning DRC2016-00960 Commission PC Reso 17-12 1 Year Feb 8 2017 Jan 13 2018 Planning Proposed Time Extension (Proposed) Commission I DRC2017-00901 1 Year Feb 14. 2017 Jan 13 2019 • Subdivision Map Act allows up to 5 years of extensions. • The Tentative Parcel Map originally approved 3 lots, ranging from 8,455 to 9,635 square feet. • The map is in conformance with the Development Code standards (i.e. lot width, lot depth, lot size). m x Fn s eu rwHa -----L"BSL- a�-r�,.s Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18626 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 13626 ' 4 LEMON AVBlE r� . iY)nYPW. •••a nnnr. wan I r M — e._a,..,�.m...r.,. r... r ... v GI I --�_- OIY aF P Arn I = _ Y. ®41oW u _------------ _- rsa• ■ 4 I ` — -. - i ur r�� Am }------ I i Yip' ur e rsysa__. AMMamps il � Y' � 1 a s""� i �/� ' { Q-�R-i r aruYn -____ -11Y-bM0 r-yY"� i'� Yr MNWiM � _ i _________ _ �. J A-____.__i r _____ i ur • No �u rfn•n U� 61Y{Q�r 1 , i • �� __ ur ___11 .-.v, J111W1•out ;warms; I ;�i.'r� � - 1 "-- JOIN 4 M ea rNe B.i'� err® Ly � •_____, waw. Environmental Review and Recommendation • Categorically Exempt from CEQA under Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions. • No significant changes are proposed. Therefore, no additional environmental review is necessary. • Staff recommends approval of Time Extension DRC2017- 00901. ,'�;. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING At its regular meeting held on February 14, 2018, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission continued the following item to an unspecified date: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00084 — DEDEAUX PROPERTIES LLC —A proposal to construct a 56,560-square foot commercial trucking facility for office, storage, freight handling, shipping and trucking services on an 11.82 acre site located within the Heavy Industrial (HI) District at the northwest corner of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railway and Etiwanda Avenue at 8822 and 8768 Etiwanda Avenue - APNs: 0229-131-15, 16 and 26. The project includes a request to remove thirty-two (32) trees with the development of the site. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Said continuance was passed by the following vote: Ayes: GUGLIELMO, MACIAS, OAXACA, WIMBERLY Noes: NONE Absent: MUNOZ Abstain: NONE Date: February 15, 2018 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Lois J. Schrader, declare as follows: I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; that at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on February 14, 2018, said public hearing was opened and continued to a date unspecified in the NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE shown above; and that on February 15, 2018, at the hour of 4:00 p.m., a copy of said notice was posted in a conspicuous place near the door in which said meeting was held. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 15, 2018, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ois . Schr r Planning Cdtfimission Secretary Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission of February 14, 2018 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN -IN SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding. Thank you. NAME ADDRESS CITY 1. ��JY�L2 Shy �(} �6 00 into 3. nr p5 k-J 4. krVli(l� �Q $5a� Grit�cc a (A R, c 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. WORKSHOP 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ITEM h h3_5 ._kL 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20.