The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2018-11-28 - Agenda Packet PC-HPC1VVVCIWIEscm LOQ LV 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. -CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Guglielmo Vice Chairman (Vacant) Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Oaxaca Commissioner Wimberly B. ANNOUNCEMENTS B1. INTRODUCTION OF NEWLY APPOINTED HISTORIC PRESERVATION/PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER BRYAN DOPP C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. D. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1 of 4 nuvcivior-M LOQ LV 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. D1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of November 14, 2018 E. DIRECTOR'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chairman may open the meeting for public input. E1. Requirement for 3D Renderings, 3D Modeling and /or Virtual Tours for Proposed Projects F. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. F1. TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816 - GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. - A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17444) related to a 13 -unit condominium development on 2.17 acres of land in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 0202-131-27, -61 and - 62. On October 10, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. G. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2of4 IV V V Clll or -M 407 LV 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: H. ADJOURNMENT I, Susan Shaker, Acting Executive Assistant II of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Wednesday, November 21, 2018, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. sl,rsavt, shaleer Susan Shaker Acting Executive Assistant II City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate In this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. if appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. Page 3 of 4 muV tnnur-K ,co, LV 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m, except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,793 for all decisions of the Commission. (f=ees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Manning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Page 4 of 4 Vicinity Map Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting Z CL U Base Line Foothill Arrow 8th a 0 a F, J November 28, 2018 Church N 6th t a L N LO 4th I ¢ = _ F1: Time Extension DRC2018-00816 ey Base Line Church Foothill N L f l� Arrow r H 6th w 4th r Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive 1-4uVamor-M is*, ALU 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER 7-03 PM Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call. Chairman Guglielmo X_ Vice Chairman (Vacant) Commissioner Munoz X Commissioner Oaxaca )C— Commissioner Commissioner Wimberly _X— Additional Staff Present- Candyce Bumett, City Planner; Mike Smith, Senior Planner; Nick Ghirelh, Assistant City Attorney; Brian Sandona, Senior Engineer; Deputy Fire Chief Mike McCliman; Rob Ball, Fire Marshall: Donnie Mahoney, Police Chief; Valerie Victorino, Executive Assistant. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. NONE C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1 of 7 D1 -Pg 1 1VUV C1V1Dr_ c l ff+, cV I o HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of October 24, 2018 C2. Consideration to adopt Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) Minutes of October 24, 2018 Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Munoz, carried 3-0-1 (Oaxaca abstaining) to adopt the Consent Calendar_ D. DIRECTOR'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chairman may open the meeting for public input. D1. A Director's Report on the status of a condition of approval to install a Eucalyptus Windrow along the south side of Tract 18122, a nearly completed 76 -lot subdivision with a combined area of about 53 acres in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Pian, located at the east side of East Avenue and about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR - 210); APNs: 0225-062-01 through -20, 0225-085-01 through -18, 0225-452-01 through -20, 0225-546-01 through -18. Related Files- Variance DRC2009-00020 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224- Mike Smith, Senior Planner, gave the Staff Report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). The report was an update on the status for the completion of a condition of approval that applied to Tract 98922. - Staff requested direction from the Planning Commission for the next steps that should be followed for handling the issue, i -e. a public hearing to modify the condition or address the issue administratively. The Commissioners asked who was responsible for the maintenance of the trees, if there was a Homeowner's Association for the subdivision, and said that the builder should be responsible for meeting the condition of approval, Page 2 of 7 D1 --Pg 2 1-1VYCIYI0Gr% 1-t, LV 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Staff responded by stating that the HOA is responsible for the maintenance of the trails but not the frees because the trees are not part of the trails. The Commission stated that they were fine with the issue being handled administratively and staff should direct KB Home to contact the homeowners at Lots 1-16 to determine if the owners would allow KB Home to plant the correct trees on their property before taking final action. Additionally, they stated staff should work with KB Home to establish the process for doing this. The Commission also requested a follow-up report on the outcome of this matter at a future Planning Commission meeting. E. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. E1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00097 — RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTICTICITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of a proposed public safety facility, consisting of multiple buildings with a combined floor area of about 21,200 square feet and a carport of 5,100 square feet, for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department on a vacant property consisting of 107,722 square feet (2.45 acres) in the Medium (M) Residential District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, located at 8870 San Bernardino Road on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road; APNs: 0207-101-48 and 0208-091-36, -56, -57, and -72. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00234 and Variance DRC2018- 00162. A Mitigated Negative Qeclaration of environmental impacts was prepared for consideration. E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2018-00234 — RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTICT/CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to operate a public safety facility, consisting of multiple buildings with a combined floor area of about 21,200 square feet and a carport of 5,100 square feet, for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department on a vacant property consisting of 107,722 square feet (2.45 acres) in the Medium (M) Residential District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, located at 8870 San Bernardino Road on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road; APNs: 0207-101-48 and Page 3 of 7 D1—Pg 3 IVVVr-morK 1Aty LV [O HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 0208-091-36, -56, -57, and -72, Related Files: Design Review DRC2018-00097 and Variance DRC2018-00162. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was prepared for consideration. E3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2018-00162 — RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTICTICITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request for a Variance to allow an increase in the maximum allowable height for perimeter screen and combination walls that will be constructed for a proposed public safety facility, consisting of multiple buildings with a combined floor area of about 21,200 square feet and a carport of 5,100 square feet, for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department on a vacant property consisting of 107,722 square feet (2.45 acres) in the Medium (M) Residential District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, located at 8870 San Bernardino Road on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road; APNs: 0207-101-48 and 0208-091-36, -56, -57, and -72. Related Files: Design Review DRC2018-00097 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00234. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was prepared for consideration. Michael Smith, Senior Planner, gave the staff report and Power Point presentation (copy on file) Chairman Guglielmo opened the public hearing. Denise Garzaro, a homeowner on Red Hill, expressed her support for the project and stated that it will increase public safety and wellness on the west side of the City. Chairman Guglielmo asked staff how the new facility will address the need for public safety facility in the City and enhance the ability to provide services in that area of the City_ Deputy Fire Chief McCliman stated that the old fire station on San Bernardino Road was built in 1947 and is outdated for today's needs. The change of location will decrease their response time by 30-45 seconds in that area which consists of some neighborhoods that are difficult to access. Also, having the broader range of services with both a fire station and police station at the same location will a positive service to the City. Police Chief Donnie Mahoney also addressed the Commission and stated one of the benefits for the location of the proposed new station would be the ability for citizens to come in during normal business (8:00am to 5:00pm) for services. The current police station at City Hall is at full capacity and the new proposed facility will be the "Central Station" and this station will be called the "West End Station". Page 4 of 7 D1—Pg 4 I'M vvE__IYIoc,F% I�rI w 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Chairman Guglielmo closed the public hearing, Commissioner Munoz stated that the aging station replacement will be a better benefit to the entire area with the expanded service. He noted public facilities are allowed in this area of the City and the project meets all requirements and all issues have been addressed adequately. He supports the project, Commissioner Wimberly concurred and stated that the partnership with the City, Fire and Police together is a positive enhancement and the location of the facility is a good use of the site and could reduce the crime in that area, Commissioner Oaxaca thanked both departments for the great concept of a joint building and services and that it sends a great message to the residents that the first responders are truly partners in our City. Chairman Guglielmo agreed and noted that response times are critical and that this will help reduce those times. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, carried 4-0 to adopt the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and the Resolutions approving Design Review DRC2016-00097, Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00234 and Variance DRC2018-00162 as presented by staff, F. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: Commissioner Munoz gave an update on the League of California Cities from a recent conference call where they discussed the status of key legislation results from election. He noted since Proposition 6 did not pass, revenues earmarked for transportation will be continued to be distributed. He also noted that housing in the state of California is an issue that will be coming up with the election of Newsome. He said that Governor - elect Newsome has stated that he wants at least 3 Y2million new homes built in California by 2025, increasing the number of new homes built annually from 100,000 to 378,000 which would be a challenge for cities throughout the state. Some reasons why it will be challenging are the CEQA regulations which makes building and development much more expensive and the resistance to building new housing coming from residents. Cities who do not build could lose their autonomy to the State_ Page 5 of 7 D1—Pg 5 NOVEMBER 14, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Munoz will bring back the goals that they are setting for 2099 in the near future. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: NONE G. ADJOURNMENT 8:12 PM I, Susan Shaker, Acting Executive Assistant li of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, November 08, 2018, seventy two {72} hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. susaw shaleer Susan Shaker Acting Executive Assistant Il City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list Page 6 of 7 D1—Pg fi NOVEMBER 14, 201$ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,793 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Page 7 of 7 D1—Pg 7 REPORT DATE: November 28, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner INITIATED BY: Perry Banner, Contract Planner SUBJECT A Directors Report on a request by the Planning Commission to evaluate adding the requirement for 3D renderings, 3D modeling and/or virtual tours for proposed projects. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the information that is presented and provide policy direction on a new requirement for applicants/developers to submit 3D visualization of a project with their applications by way of renderings and 3D modeling/animation for medlum- and large-scale development projects that are proposed in the future. BACKGROUND: On October 24, 2018, the Planning Commission requested information and analysis on a new policy that would require developers to provide three-dimensional renderings, modeling and/or virtual tours for larger scale projects in order to assist with the Commission's visual understanding of a proposed development. Staff was also directed to find the threshold for which size and scale of projects should trigger the submittal of a 3D rendering and/or virtual tour. Architectural visualization is the art of creating two-dimensional and three-dimensional images showing the attributes of a proposed architectural design. Rapid advancements in 3D modeling and 3D rendering technology is changing the way architects design in a way that wasn't possible 15 years ago. 3D rendering and architectural visualization software enable architects and designers to evaluate "proportions" and "scales" using intuitive interactive 3D modelling and simulate the effects of lighting, ventilation, and acoustics in internal environments. 3D artists today are getting so good at their craft that they are able to produce realistic 3D renderings of buildings, giving clients an accurate 3D visualization of the proposed design. These proposed architectural visualizations can represent anything the client desires from the scale, textures, interior furnishings, etc. and are often represented together with "architectural scenes" where everyday actions are being carried out. What 3D visualization provides is an excellent understanding of the design concept. For the architect and client, it reduces the amount of changes for a project before construction is started. For local government, it reduces the uncertainty factor in a proposed building's appearance and scale and allows the decision makers to get a feel for the layout and flow of the project to make a more educated decision on the project design. Using 3D technologies makes plans, especially on E1 Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REQUIRING 3D VISUALIZATION November 28, 2018 Page 2 complicated projects, much easier to understand and navigate. The following is a sampling of 3D visualization techniques: F1 Pg2 3D rendering of building_ Extruded floor plan_ Virtual tour of office interior. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REQUIRING 3D VISUALIZATION November 28, 2018 Page 3 Other examples of modeling can include virtual project "walk-throughs" and "fly-throughs" using camera animation to give the 3D drawings direction and movement to allow the viewer the ability to see what the overall impression of the architecture and site development will feel like to walk through and "augmented reality" that uses real images and adds computer generated plans and 3D images to create an environment to see the finished project on an empty lot. As technology continues to change, the options become limitless. ANALYSIS: Architectural visualization using 3D modeling and 3D rendering technology has become one of the most important communication tools for architects and designers. It is a tool used to bridge the gap in understanding between architects, clients, builders, and regulators (i.e. cities and local jurisdictions). As local requirements adjust with the rapidly advancing technology, cities are beginning to require 3D modeling as a standard component of a submittal package for a project under development review. A short survey of neighboring cities identified the following: Los Angeles 3D renderings required for development projects reviewed by the City Planning Commission (CPC) and the Area Planning Commission (APC) Ontario "Perspectives," which are similar to 3D renderings are required, otherwise the Director can request any plans deemed necessary Pasadena 3D renderings required for new projects under Design Review, generally enforced more for projects reviewed by the Planning Commission and the Design Commission Santa 3D renderings not explicitly required for development projects, but may be requested Monica Rancho 3D renderings not explicitly required but per Section 17.14.020 the Planning Director ay require any plans, maps, and data deemed necessary to provide the approving Cucamonga m authority with adequate information to base their decision on. What appears typical is that Planning and Community Development Departments either explicitly require 3D renderings or routinely ask for them in the review of projects. What is also typical is that 3D renderings are predominantly used as a presentation tool for Planning Commission, Design Review Committee, and other similar committees. Projects reviewed at the staff level typically do not require submittal of 3D renderings. What also appears to be clear is that cities may require or ask for 3D renderings to visualize the exterior of a building, which is what is visible from the public realm, but it is infrequent for cities to require a virtual tourlanimation of the building interior. Cost The cost to produce a mid-level 3D rendering for a medium sized project is between $1,500- $3,500 in the Southern California market. This would be to produce a model of the building exterior. The cost varies depending on the level of detail. This is just for architectural still imaging. Creating a virtual tour or animation of a building interior/exterior is generally priced on a cost per second basis of the animation and could cost between $5,000410,000 depending on duration and level of detailing. E1 Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REQUIRING 3D VISUALIZATION November 28, 2018 Page 4 Threshold For a 3D rendering, Staff and the Planning Commission would be particularly interested in how it would convey size and scale, building massing, site layout, roof articulation, architectural detailing, and exterior finishes. These elements would demonstrate how a proposed project would be compatible with an existing neighborhood and surrounding development, In Pasadena, any project that requires Design Commission review requires a 3D model as part of the submittal package. With some exceptions, Pasadena's thresholds are that structures over 25,000 sq. ft. and/or residential projects consisting of 10 or more dwelling units require Design Commission review, and therefore, 3D modeling (see Exhibit A — City of Pasadena Digital 3D Model Usage Policy). The City of Adelaide, Australia uses a height threshold for determining when a 3D model is required for a project. Any residential, commercial, mixed-use, or institutional development three stories or higher requires 3D modeling regardless of density. For the City of Rancho Cucamonga, potential basic guidelines are outlined below. The types of projects subject to these requirements, the thresholds for the size/scale of the project that triggers the requirements, and the timing of when the visualizations must be submitted will be further refined: Any application for a project that requires review by the Design Review Committee and/or review and approval by the Planning Commission will be required to include 3D renderings for the following projects: • Mixed Use development; • Multi -family development of 4 units (or more); • Industrial development with one or more buildings of 100,000 square feet (or more) in floor area; • Commercial development on project sites of 3 acres or with buildings of 25,000 square feet (or more) of gross floor area. One (1) additional form of modeling will be required such as, virtual tour/fly-through, "augmented reality', and 3D street perspective, for the following projects: • Mixed Use development with buildings that are three stories and/or 35 feet (or more) in height; • Mixed Use development with a density of 25 dwelling units (or more) per acre; • Multi -family development of 50 units (or more); • Commercial development on project sites of 5 acres (or more); and • Industrial development with one or more buildings of 500,000 square feet (or more) in floor area. NEXT STEPS: Upon receiving input and direction from the Planning Commission, Staff will formalize a new policy for requiring 3D modeling for certain projects for consideration by the Planning Commission and add the requirement to the applicable checklists for development applications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A — City of Pasadena Digital 3D Model Usage Policy E1 Pg4 DIGITAL. 3D MODEL USAGE POLICY PURPOSE OF THE POLICY The purpose of this policy is to disclose the intended use and release of digital 3D massing models submitted to the City of Pasadena in conjunction with the review of Planning Division applications (zoning entitlements, design review and master development plans). PURPOSE OF DIGITAL 3D MODEL The city has obtained a digital 3D model of all buildings in the city as they existed in 2008 The models were created using building footprint and height data to create 3-dimensional buildings and digitally attaching photographs of each side of the building to the 3-dimensional model. One of the purposes of acquiring this model is to assist city planners in the analysis of new development projects. Applications for new development projects of citywide significance will require submittal of a digital 3D massing model for this purpose. City planners will incorporate digital models submitted by applicants into the surrounding context of digital models of existing buildings and will create images and animations to present to decision -makers. In addition to assisting planners with the review of new projects, the city's digital 3D model may be made available to the public for viewing through online mapping applications. The city intends to update its digital 3D model by replacing the models of demolished buildings with the models of new buildings after they are constructed. Digital 3D models of new buildings will be required to be submitted at various stages in the city's review process and, upon completion of construction, will be inserted into the overall city model. SUBMITTAL AND RELEASE OF DIGITAL_ 3D MODEL Digital 3D models submitted to the city should be massing models of the exterior "shell" of the building and related architectural features and not detailed engineering models of the building's structure or interior. Digital 3D model files of projects that are in draft form (i.e., prior to completion of construction) will not be released to any member of the public without permission from the project applicant. Upon completion of construction, buildings are assumed to be an element of the city's land fabric and, therefore, may be made available for public viewing. When the model becomes part of city's land fabric, the model could be released as part of the neighborhood context under the terms of the city's data sharing agreement or as required under state of federal law. By signing below, I acknowledge that I understand and will comply with the City's 3D Model Usage Policy. Applicant signature Date EXHIBIT A E1 Pg5 DATE: November 28, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner(,t INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816 - GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. - A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17444) related to a 13 -unit condominium development on 2.17 acres of land in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APNs: 0202-131-27, -61 and -62. On October 10 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a one (1) year Time Extension DRC2018-00816 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. BACKGROUND: On October 10, 2007, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 and Design Review DRC2005-00250 for the subdivision and design review of a 2.17 -acre parcel of land for the development of 13 detached condominiums. That approval included a related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2005-00523) to change the Zoning Designation from Medium (M) Residential to Low Medium (LM) Residential, to bring the project site into conformance with the General Plan Land Use Designation. The City Council approved the related Development District Amendment (DRC2005- 00523) on November 7, 2007. The original Tentative Tract Map approval was for three (3) years, which calculates to an expiration date of October 10, 2010; however, through a series of Assembly and Senate Bills, the State legislature granted multiple time extensions for tentative maps throughout the State, which extended the approval of the subject Tentative Tract Map to October 10, 2017. The Planning Commission approved a one (1) year time extension of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17744 on November 8, 2017. The time extension was requested in order to provide time for the City to complete an approved storm drain improvement on 19th Street. The City storm drain system improvements will remove the project site from a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood zone and eliminate a current Engineering Department condition of approval requiring the construction of an enlarged on-site storm drain system to capture the existing storm water runoff from the adjacent mobile home park. The City storm drain project was originally scheduled to start in 2018 and has been delayed until 2019. The applicant is requesting a second one (1) year time extension of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 in order to allow the City time to complete the storm drain improvements on 19th Street, which is scheduled to go out to bid in 2019. F1—Pgt PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816 — GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 28, 2018 Page 2 If the upstream storm drain improvements at 19th Street are not constructed as part of a capital improvement project in 2019 because of unforeseen circumstances, including, but not limited to, funding constraints or other capital improvement delays, the applicant will have two options: 1) pursue final map recordation and construct the necessary storm drain improvements at the westerly edge of property to intercept upstream flows (headwall, catch basin and 54" pipe) and convey these flows to a larger storm drain under Archibald; or 2) apply for third time extension for an additional one (1) year and wait for the City to complete the storm drain project at 19th Street. Per Title 16 (Subdivisions) of the City's Municipal Code, Section 16.16.170 permits one-year time extensions not to exceed a total of 5 years. Following this time extension request, if approved, the applicant has the opportunity to request up to 3, one-year time extensions. RELATED FILES: The related Design Review entitlement (DRC2005-00250) was reviewed by the Grading and Technical Review Committees on February 6, 2007 and by the Design Review Committee on July 3, 2007. Approval of the related Design Review DRC2005-00250 was approved by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2007 and expired on October 10, 2012. Subsequently, the applicant submitted a new application for the Design Review of the 13 -unit condominiums (DRC2013-00583), which was reviewed by the Design and Technical Review Committees on June 3, 2014 and was approved by the Planning Commission on February 11, 2015. Design Review DRC2013-00583 will expire on February 11, 2020. SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and north of Monte Vista Street, adjacent to the Chaparral Heights Mobile Home Park. The project site is covered with ornamental grasses and multiple trees and has an open storm drain running through the center of the site. The property is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre). To the north and west is the Chaparral Heights mobile home park in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); to the east is single-family development in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); and, to the south is single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential District (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre). A. Project Density: 6 dwelling units per acre (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre permitted) F1—Pg2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District North Mobile Home ParkLow Low Medium Residential Medium (LM) Residential District South Single -Family Residences Medium Residential Medium (M) Residential District East Single -Family Residences Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District West Mobile Home Park Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District F1—Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816 — GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 28, 2018 Page 3 ANALYSIS: A. Prior Approvals and Automatic Extensions: This Time Extension application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 for one (1) year, which will extend the approval period to October 10, 2019. The original approval of SUBTT17444 was on October 10, 2007, for a time period of three (3) years. The original expiration date was on October 10, 2010. However, subsequent to approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, the State Legislature passed a series of Assembly/Senate Bills automatically extending the approval period of various active tentative maps throughout the State. State Bill (SB) 1185 extended the approval period one (1) year to October 10, 2011; Assembly Bill (AB) 333 extended the approval period two (2) years to October 10, 2013; Assembly Bill (AB) 208 extended the approval period two (2) years to October 10, 2015; and Assembly Bill (AB) 116 extended the approval period two (2) years to October 10, 2017. The Planning Commission approved a one (1) year time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 on November 8, 2017, which extended the approval to October 10, 2018. On October 4, 2018, the applicant filed a request for a one (1) year time extension. Tentative Tract Map 17444 Approyal History Approving Authority Approval/Extension Type Approval Period Approval Date Expiration Date Planning Commission Original Approval 3 Years 10/10/07 10/10/10 Senate Bill 1185 Automatic Extension 1 Year 10/10/11 Assembly Bill 333 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/13 Assembly Bill 208 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/15 Assembly Bill 116 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/17 Planning Commission Time Extension DRC2017-00755 1 Year 11/08/17 10/10/18 Planning Commission Time Extension DRC2018-00816 1 Year 11/28/18 10/10/19 B. Map Extension: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regulates the subdivision of land through Title 16 of the City's Municipal Code. Chapter 16.16 is applicable specifically to Tentative Maps (Five or More Parcels) and provides for time extension requests through Section 16.16.170 - Extensions. Section 16.16.170.A states: "The subdivider or his representative may request an extension of the expiration date of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by written application to the community development department. The application shall be filed not less than 60 days prior to the expiration date and shall state the reasons for requesting the extension." The application to extend SUBTT17444 was submitted on October 4, 2018, and includes a letter stating the reasons for requesting the extension (Exhibit C). While the applicant did not meet the 60 -day submittal deadline, flexibility in the submittal deadline has been afforded applicants in the past where the map extension request was submitted prior to the entitlement expiration date and could be brought before the Planning Commission in a timely manner. C. Conformance with Development Code: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 was designed to meet or exceed all development standards applicable to subdivisions in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 is for the subdivision of air space for condominium purposes for the future sale of the 13 units approved for the project site. The subdivision remains in conformance with development standards for the Low Medium (LM) Residential District for multi -family developments. F1—Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816 — GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 28, 2018 Page 4 D. Public Art: This subject Tentative Map Time Extension is exempt from providing public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code as the project was approved prior to the approval of Ordinance No. 912 on July 19, 2017. E. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated Time Extension DRC2018-00816 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. In June of 2017, a biological resource update letter was submitted as part of the request for the previous one (1) year time extension request. The June 2017 letter states that no native habitat types occur on site and no federally listed species were observed or are expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable native habitats, level of disturbance that has occurred to the site, and development of surrounding lands. No direct or indirect impact to federal listed species are anticipated from the project or the related Tentative Map Time Extension. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2018-00816. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent will also be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to this application, the proposed map extension for 13 unit condominium projects will enhance the 2018 City Council's goal of enhancing premier community status by providing an opportunity for market rate for -sale housing product on a 2.17 acre infill parcel. With the time extension, the site retains the entitlement to construct for -sale condominiums that will provide a transition of density and appropriate scale of residential development from the single- family dwelling units to the south to the mobile home park located to the north and west. F1—Pg4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816 — GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 28, 2018 Page 5 Lastly, the time extension request is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code which will facilitate the development of the subject property with residential uses consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Map. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received related to the project or the notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A Time Extension Request Letter Dated October 8, 2018 Exhibit B Time Extension DRC2017-00755 Planning Commission Staff Report Dated November 8, 2017 (with Exhibits including the original Staff Report with Exhibits and Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 Dated October 10, 2007) Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2018-00816 F1—Pg5 Tentative Tract Map Extension Request Letter Golden Avenue Development, Inc 10 Elk Grove Ln. Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 October 8, 2018 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 To whom it may concern, The intention of this letter is that we want to extend the Tentative Tract Map for Tract 17444 project. We want to extend the Tentative Tract Map for another 12 months, because we are still waiting for the City's storm drain construction. The project of Tract 17444 is located on 6910 Archibald Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. It consists of 13 unit detached dwellings. Last year, we were notified by the Engineering Department that the City would have a big storm drain project on 19`h Street in 2018 spring. The new storm drain system will collect all the water flows from 210 Freeway and discharge to the existing storm drain system. Thus, the 54" RCP underneath our property will become useless. In order to discuss the detail of this storm drain issue, we held a meeting with Albert Espinoza and Romeo David. The Engineering Department officials gave us a suggestion that we could start our project following to the City storm drain project. According to the Engineering official, there will be no surface water discharging to our property, after the City's storm drain on 19`h Street is constructed. If we start the construction this year, the 54" RCP inside our property will be abandoned in the future, and it leads to waste of resources. Therefore, we wanted to follow the City's engineer suggestion, and postponed our project starting date. However, according to the Engineering Department's recent update, the starting date of the City's Storm drain was delayed to 2019 spring due to the design issue. Thus, we have to postpone our project starting date as well. As the project developer, we sincerely request a Tentative Tract Map extension for our project so that we can start the construction in 2019. Sincerely, Golden Avenue Development, Inc. EXHIBIT A F1—Pg6 STAFF REPORT DATE: November 8, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755- GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. - A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17444) related to a 13 -unit condominium development on 2.17 acres of land in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 0202-131-27, 61 and 62. On October 10 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a one (1) year Time Extension DRC2017- 00755, through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking a one (1) year time extension to a previously approved tentative tract map (SUBTT17444) in order to allow the City to complete storm drain improvements on 19th Street. Storm water from 19th Street currently flows through the adjacent mobile home park and across the project site to an inlet on Archibald Avenue. The storm drain system improvements will eliminate the need fora current Engineering Department condition of approval requiring the construction of an enlarged on-site storm drain system to capture the existing storm water runoff from the adjacent mobile home park. The City storm drain project is scheduled to commence in early 2018. On October 10, 2007, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 and Design Review DRC2005-00250 for the subdivision and design review of a 2.17 -acre parcel of land for condominium purposes for the development of 13 condominiums. That approval included a related Development District Amendment (DRC2005-00523), to change the Development District Map from Medium Residential to Low Medium Residential, to bring the site into conformance with the General Plan land use designation. The Design Review and the related subdivision were reviewed by the Grading and Technical Review Committees on February 6, 2007 and by the Design Review Committee on July 3, 2007. The City Council approved the related Development District Amendment (DRC2005- 00523) on November 7, 2007. Approval of Development Review DRC2005-00250 expired on October 10, 2012. Subsequently, the applicant submitted a new application for the design review of the 13 units (DRC2013-00583), which was reviewed by the Design and Technical Review Committees on June 3, 2014 and approved by the EXHIBIT B F1—Pg7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755— GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 8, 2017 Page 2 Planning Commission on February 11, 2015. Design Review approval of DRC2013-00583 will expire on February 11, 2020. SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and north of Monte Vista Street, adjacent to the Chaparral Heights Mobile Home Park. The project site is covered with ornamental grasses and multiple trees and has an open storm drain running through the center of the site. The property is within the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre). To the north and west is the Chaparral Heights mobile home park in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); to the east is single-family development in the Low Medium District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); and, to the south is single-family development in the Medium (M) District (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre). A. Proiect Density: 6 dwelling units per acre (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre permitted) ANALYSIS: A. Prior Approvals and Automatic Extensions: This time extension application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 for one (1) year. The original approval of SUBTT17444 was on October 10, 2007, for a time period of three (3) years. The original expiration date was on October 10, 2010. However, subsequent to approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, the State Legislature passed a series of Assembly/Senate Bills automatically extending the approval period of various active tentative maps throughout the State. State Bill (SB) 1185 extended the approval period 1 -year to October 10, 2011; Assembly Bill (AB) 333 extended the approval period 2 -years to October 10, 2013; Assembly Bill (AB) 208 extended the approval period 2 -years to October 10, 2015; and, Assembly Bill (AB) 116 extended the approval period 2 -years to October 10, 2017. Tentatrie'-Tradt Map 17444J,, Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Low Medium Low Medium (LM) North Mobile Home Park Low Medium Low Medium (LM) South Single -Family Residences Medium Medium (M) East Single -Family Residences Low Medium Low Medium (LM) West Mobile Home Park Low Medium Low Medium (LM) ANALYSIS: A. Prior Approvals and Automatic Extensions: This time extension application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 for one (1) year. The original approval of SUBTT17444 was on October 10, 2007, for a time period of three (3) years. The original expiration date was on October 10, 2010. However, subsequent to approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, the State Legislature passed a series of Assembly/Senate Bills automatically extending the approval period of various active tentative maps throughout the State. State Bill (SB) 1185 extended the approval period 1 -year to October 10, 2011; Assembly Bill (AB) 333 extended the approval period 2 -years to October 10, 2013; Assembly Bill (AB) 208 extended the approval period 2 -years to October 10, 2015; and, Assembly Bill (AB) 116 extended the approval period 2 -years to October 10, 2017. Tentatrie'-Tradt Map 17444J,, Approving Authority A roval/Extension Type Approval Period Approval Date Expiration Date Planning Commission Original Approval 3 Years 10/10/07 10/10/10 Senate Bill 1185 Automatic Extension 1 Year 10/10/11 Assembly Bill 333 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/13 Assembly Bill 208 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/15 Assembly Bill 116 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/17 Planning Commission Time Extension DRC2017-00755 1 Year 10/10/18 F1—Pg8 PLANNING COMMISSION 8 FF REPORT I TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755— GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 8, 2017 Page 3 B. Map Extension: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regulates the subdivision of land through Title 16, the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Section 16.16 is applicable specifically to Tentative Maps (Five or More Parcels)-- and provides fortime extension requests through Section 16.16.170 Extensions. Section 16.16.170.A, states: "The subdivider or his representative may request an extension of the expiration date of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by written application to the community development department. The application shall be filed not less than 60 days prior to the expiration date and shall state the reasons for requesting the extension." The application to extend SUBTT17444 was submitted on September 19, 2017, and includes a letter stating the reasons for requesting the extension (Exhibit C). While the applicant did not meet the 60 day submittal deadline, flexibility in the submittal deadline has been afforded applicants in the past where the map extension request was submitted prior to the entitlement expiration date and could be brought before the Planning Commission in a timely manner. C. Conformance with Development Code: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 was designed to meet or exceed all development standards applicable to subdivisions in the Low Medium (LM) District. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 is for the subdivision of air space for condominium purposes for the future sale of the 13 units approved for the project site. The subdivision remains in conformance with Development standards for the Low Medium (LM) District for multi -family developments. D. Biological Survey Update: A biological resource update letter (Recon; June 7, 2017) was submitted as part of the request for the time extension. The letter verifies that no native habitat types occur on-site and no federally listed species were observed or are expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable native habitats, level of disturbance that has occurred to the site and development of surrounding lands. No direct or indirect impact to federal listed species are anticipated from the project or the related tentative map time extension. E. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated Time Extension DRC2017-00755 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The biological resource update letter dated June 7, 2017, concludes that no direct or indirect impact to federal listed species are anticipated from the project or the related tentative map time extension. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different F1—Pg9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755— GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 8, 2017 Page 4 mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2017-00755. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received related to the project or the notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Exhibit B - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 Exhibit C - Time Extension Request Letter Dated September 14, 2017 Exhibit D - Biological Resources Update Letter Dated June 7, 2017 Exhibit E - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 10, 2007 (with Exhibits) Exhibit F - Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 07-59 for SUBTT17444 Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2017-00755 CB/TV/Is F1—Pg10 to C Ar ng Onelp'l �71 zo, a) n -.1 " - V " 1 TE. VMN�Crt (U si- 6,eny P1, Archibald Ave Archibald Ave Archibald Av( Arp 'Jadeite .Ave> Ci ; ��65 :21,a_o 0o M -i EaSIT, r. I , n.> Juniper Dr 0 4 r U7 t 15 .0 Bola 03 r. db rc i n rc I A -c)r cc FL lyst Ave Amethyst Ave- AmVMhystTAlj 0 N N O 0 N O N K W J LL iQr F, >rn� in e LU z mUu; Z V o n QCO fD N N Z, z =toz O 2 �;�a.Ef yn:s376 - z.. -,res i66ej, � i- E� — -- YS NfeOl.7fA I _ I t":lie 5 �1 XY o -i is as F Y:Q .k ak ik 3 a:Y, ? YfY yYyyy Y9."a Y..jfl.. Y7A3.... .. a �iA e a F>.5i5i555i i ky... 888(8 yk?_ Fky e�_ jet 3- , YB y3kv kis i3 `�: e�. d:YY:-YY�„ E0 yka yCk p'e4 F..i a�l 3.:S-=-•_ ..t§ ! E xY .EEi _k']� - -Y• d3G. �. o•_ 5 .. $i.+i � a k qE. ::'_ .i. � � •e h � a -t: Y�$YY38 VYY g Z_.. H C 5£ y 55Yk 5 lye i E 9 _e 2 5 d2`2d 3dilit i Y�-'u g �Y 5 �e k Ye ppL89 tS a¢ay Y k, K S y+'e_'u'a b E ;; -r �•` jeCo3 •,.5££i.8 EXHIBIT .�('� �I�$�17 F7-Pgl2 ®1SBlt a — -- YS NfeOl.7fA I _ I t":lie 5 �1 XY o -i is as F Y:Q .k ak ik 3 a:Y, ? YfY yYyyy Y9."a Y..jfl.. Y7A3.... .. a �iA e a F>.5i5i555i i ky... 888(8 yk?_ Fky e�_ jet 3- , YB y3kv kis i3 `�: e�. d:YY:-YY�„ E0 yka yCk p'e4 F..i a�l 3.:S-=-•_ ..t§ ! E xY .EEi _k']� - -Y• d3G. �. o•_ 5 .. $i.+i � a k qE. ::'_ .i. � � •e h � a -t: Y�$YY38 VYY g Z_.. H C 5£ y 55Yk 5 lye i E 9 _e 2 5 d2`2d 3dilit i Y�-'u g �Y 5 �e k Ye ppL89 tS a¢ay Y k, K S y+'e_'u'a b E ;; -r �•` jeCo3 •,.5££i.8 EXHIBIT .�('� �I�$�17 F7-Pgl2 Tentative Tract Map Extension Request Letter Golden Avenue Development, Inc 10 Elk Grove Ln. Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 September 14, 2017 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 To whom it may concern, The intention of this letter is that we want to extend the Tentative Tract Map for Tract 17444 project. We want to extend the Tentative Tract Map for 16 months, because we are still working on the final map process. The project of Tract 17444 is located on 6910 Archibald Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. It consists of 13 unit detached dwellings. Due to the elevation, all the water flows coming from 210 Freeway drains through our property and discharge to the City's storm drain on Archibald. Because of the huge amount of water flow, we originally proposed to construct a 54" Reinforced Concrete Pipe collecting the surface flows from our neighbor, Chaparral Height Mobile Home Park, and discharge to the City's storm drain system. We submitted our plan sets to the City last year, and our house plans were approved by the Building Department in mid -2016. At the end of 2016, our plan checker from the Engineering Department, Willie Valbuena, retired. As a result, our plans were held by the Engineering Department for a couple months. Therefore, we requested an extension for our plan check process from the Building Department, and the City granted us a one-year extension. Recently, we were notified by the Engineering Department that the City will have a big storm drain project on 19th Street in 2018 spring. The new storm drain system will collect all the water flows from 210 Freeway and discharge to the existing storm drain system. Thus, the 54" RCP underneath our property will become useless. In order to discuss the detail of this storm drain issue, we held a meeting with Albert Espinoza and Romeo David. The Engineering Department officials gave us a suggestion that we could start our project in September 2018, once the City storm drain is completed. According to the Engineering official, there will be no surface water discharging to our property, after the City's storm drain on 19th Street is constructed. If we start the construction this year, the 54" RCP inside our property will be abandoned in the future, and it leads to waste of resources. Therefore, we want to follow the City's engineer suggestion, and postpone our project starting date. As the project developer, we sincerely request a Tentative Tract Map extension for our project so that we can start the construction in September 2018. Sincerely, Golden Avenue Development, Inc. PG 1%1611-1 F1—Pg13 RECON An Employee -Owned Company June 7, 2017 Mr. Ye Liu Golden Avenue Development, Inc. 10 Elk Grove Lane Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 Reference: Federal Emergency Management Agency Letter for Mountain View Estates: Required Background Information for Issuance of CLOMR-F (RECON Number 877 7) Dear Mr. Liu This letter provides the background information needed by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to make a "no take" determination as part of the Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR-F) for the Mountain View Estates project. The project applicant is proposing to alter a portion of the current FEND -delineated 100 - year floodplain. Information contained in this letter demonstrates how the Mountain View Estates project would not affect any listed species covered under the federal Endangered Species Act. The 2.6 -acre project site is located in the city of Rancho Cucamonga approximately S miles north of Interstate 10 and 8 miles west of Interstate 15 (Figure 1). Specifically, the site occurs to the west of Archibald Avenue, north of Monte Vista Street, and east of East Street (Figure 2). The project site includes Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0202- 131-27, 0202-131-61, and 0202-131-62 Biological Resource Evaluation Methods EILAR Associates Environmental and Acoustical Consulting biologists conducted a general biological survey on the project site in June 2005. The biological resource survey identified one land cover type on the site: "Landscaped and Exotic". No native habitat types occur on-site. Federal listed species with the potential to occur on-site were evaluated based on habitat present on the project site. The information provided on habitat was used to make determinations on the likelihood of any federal listed species to be directly or indirectly affected by the project. A search of the California Natural Diversity Database was conducted to find known observations of federal listed species either on the project site or in its vicinity (Attachment 1). The potential for these listed species to occur on the project site was then further evaluated using the information on habitat preferences and ecological conditions preferred by each species. No federal listed species were observed or are expected,to occur on the project site due to the lack of any suitable native habitats, level of disturbance that has occurred to the site, and development of surrounding lands. No direct or indirect impacts to federal listed species are anticipated from the project. There is no critical habitat for any federal listed species designated on the project site. Effects on Federal Listed Species Federal listed plant and wildlife species with the potential for occurrence on the Mountain View Estates project site were evaluated for presence/absence and for any anticipated direct or indirect impacts on these species. The project site lacks suitable habitat for any of the listed species with the potential for occurrence on-site. Therefore. no direct or indirect impacts to any federal listed species are anticipated from the project. Sincerely, lremorL ry Sc ei Biologist GAS:eab EXHIBIT 1927 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, CA 92101 1 619.308.9333 1 reconenvironmental.com SAN DIEGO 1 CENTRAL FlAkl`rg 14 BERKELEY I TUCSON n n. 11P711-1 ATTACHMENT 1 F1-Pg15 FI,d.r.I Listed Spc�i,, with the Nte,tial for Occurrenceon the Alountah, Specied Sairnfifir Nrtmr Strtta'Pedvrnl IfnbitatlPref'erence/Reyuss'ements! View Estat" Ptoject Site Basis for Determination of Occurremee C,mimon Name Stow= Blooming Period Potential PLANTSPECIES PULS(;'IN ME BUCWHF..AT FAMILY 51end.v'-hnrm•tl iphvdloa'er F'E Chaparral. alluvial fan =vruh. Old sondv henrhes mThis specie.. hn_ a lute pw nrial fur IA,rh•rnhehur l,pt ..... c. tl.,udplain t,a•rnre- b,•lrnr'_ •tMl feet. unenrcenr•• Oft ,it,' du•• to th,. !ark of I _ --- - appropriate habitat____ W LDLIFE SPECIES INVERTEBRATES MYDIDAE Iteihi Sands t7utcer-Im'in, tic FE Delhi. -ands form.tlion inland dun,-,. Thin ..p.=eir: has ;. L,m pmrNial bw Iihuphianirlux term iaal"a ocrueeenee nn -site due [o the I:u•k of abdorninahx nppiroprina• innd. soil- and level of past disfttrbnnne. ADI PHiBUN'S BLFIINInAE TRUE Taws An nn tmrl FE Open .itreomsi& •an,llgravel flats Ctuiri. shallo Thi. ipa, tea ha- a bm potential for :1ra.nree ra)i,.•vraien.¢ poufs dung stream edgers are breeding habitat. r,t•;=w•rerre on•:ite clue to ih,• lark of Karturnal except during breeding seasnn appropriate, stream habitat. (;•larch Mvt. R.+SI0.4: TRL-t: FROUS .N ountain yeflnw-legged frog FE Perennial rocky stream vourses. steep xi-ad!ent This species has It low pott•ntial for flnuu nn,aeo.?a stream>. rivers. perennial creek=. wcurrenee on.;its du•• to the lack of appropriate;trumhabitat. - BIRDS SYLtTIUAE GXATCATCHERA Cuashil C'alifnrni�i-- - — FT __ -' 1'crasril loge srrttb. nun'itime:urru!ant _:crab. This species has a Inw pot r'ntiul rut• gq: reutchor Resident ancurrence on-site due to the intik,.f rel inptila odi fa r; h'a appropriate habitat. tali OY,tim Mountain Vim Estutes Prrgect Page 1 F1—Pg16 _ MAMMALS HETERDJIYTDAE PUI'KF.Tb[ll'E&K{\n.\Ru0 RAIS ":m Hrnnartlino Mrw woa.tal :ale .rrnh. 6;nwtrnn r: to md% loam :uLstrnti, ni Di o I...I, < rrt •n-narni [rarr;re alhr{ r d LA, and floodplain,- _ FE = <•ndany,•rrd Mountoin b'iI,w Estates Proie r Pnge F1-Pg17 Im' TRI a nal a iIsw purent;i bM ooruVrncz scar d tw to th, l.uk of app vinic habitat _ a Wdghlwood p�. a e r� L O S AN G E L E S C O U N T Y San Gabriel Reservoir Morris Reservoir - LVUa C o,e �'S 4 Sin 'Jer•,ardin.-0 NF S A N BE RN AR DI NO C O U N T Y ^ * Rancho Cucamonga (1k) Fontana f { O WAr� W v 80,9 a 9a . _.nmona. - Montclair -- r-- • ---� �--�- Walnut Ontario .Industry Diamond Bar� C Chino r I r 151: V7 Chino Hills KERN ,ills LOS ANGELES irk Prado Flood N JENTURAControt � Basin i ER SI DE :.�'{� Corona SAN DIEGOI C'h>n-:;n;' N r Hesperia v' 173• Silverwood Lake San e Bernardino '-r o c, 6,..: Y;u per• "'Rialto A Bloomington GGtend �.... sunnyelolzr ae ��errac Boa SPnngs Rubidouz C.' Moenta/n Mira Loma a Reserve Sar Ke Arra Pedley I- S a o River Ree Park _ -.i - o " 4 Ry side � a � m fi RIVE IRS IDEwx&re3 ._Gsdn•" COU N T Y Lake Mathews Project Location RECO,N h1'JOBS5187771common_gislfigi.mzd 616QD17 sae F1-Pg18 g Miles 50 FIGURE I Regional Location Los Glendorants Angeles s,H yin Claremont Azusa � 3Laaz Upland Verne Park Charter Oak Sa Covina Dim West Coviria LVUa C o,e �'S 4 Sin 'Jer•,ardin.-0 NF S A N BE RN AR DI NO C O U N T Y ^ * Rancho Cucamonga (1k) Fontana f { O WAr� W v 80,9 a 9a . _.nmona. - Montclair -- r-- • ---� �--�- Walnut Ontario .Industry Diamond Bar� C Chino r I r 151: V7 Chino Hills KERN ,ills LOS ANGELES irk Prado Flood N JENTURAControt � Basin i ER SI DE :.�'{� Corona SAN DIEGOI C'h>n-:;n;' N r Hesperia v' 173• Silverwood Lake San e Bernardino '-r o c, 6,..: Y;u per• "'Rialto A Bloomington GGtend �.... sunnyelolzr ae ��errac Boa SPnngs Rubidouz C.' Moenta/n Mira Loma a Reserve Sar Ke Arra Pedley I- S a o River Ree Park _ -.i - o " 4 Ry side � a � m fi RIVE IRS IDEwx&re3 ._Gsdn•" COU N T Y Lake Mathews Project Location RECO,N h1'JOBS5187771common_gislfigi.mzd 616QD17 sae F1-Pg18 g Miles 50 FIGURE I Regional Location 0 Feet 0 MMountain View Estates Project Boundary n rr FIGURE 2 It L C N Project Location on Aerial Photograph h19JOBS5`b777�common—gislflg2 ESA.mxd 6/6/2017 wb F1-Pg19 S- T. T H E C 1 T Y A N C H 0 CUCAN1ONGA �- I • DATE: October 10, 2007 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT - DRC2005-00523 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - A request to change the Development District Map from Medium Residential to Low - Medium Residential to bring the site into conformance with the General Plan, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 0202-131-27, 0202-131-61 and 62. Related files: Development Review DRC2005-00250, Minor Exception DRC2005-00522, Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00331. This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the public hearing before City Council will be separately noticed. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17444 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 2.17 acres for the purpose of creating a 13 unit condominium development in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre). However, a Development District Amendment has also been submitted that would amend the designation to Low -Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The project is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 0202-131-27, 61 and 62. Related Files: Development Review DRC2005-0250, Development District Amendment DRC2005-00523, Minor Exception DRC2005-00522, Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00331. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00250 - CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a 13 unit detached condominium project on 2.17 in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre). However, a Development District Amendment has also been submitted that would amend the designation to Low -Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The project is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 0202-131-27, 61, and 62. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map 17444, Development District Amendment DRC2005-00523, Minor Exception DRC2005-00522, Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00331. EXHIBIT E Ic 11 1gIi� F1—Pg20 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00523/SUBTT17444/DRC2005-00250 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 6 dwelling units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Mobile Home Park/ Low -Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Single -Family Residential/Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Multi -Family Residential/Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Mobile Home Park/ Low -Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low -Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4) dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) W est - Low -Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The 2.17 acre site is comprised of three parcels and slopes gently to the southeast. The site will share access with the mobile home park that borders the site to the north and west. The site contains 45 trees of various species and the remnants of a stone -lined drainage channel. The mobile home park has an open storm drain which currently surface drains across the site and enters the public storm drain system at the southern property line of the site. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes constructing 13 detached condominiums on 2.17 acres of vacant land. The proposed density is 6 dwelling units per acre which is in the middle of the Low -Medium Residential range of 4-8 dwelling units per acre. The project consists of three floor plans ranging in size from 1,705 to 2,113 square feet. Models A and B are two-story units with two elevations per floor plan; Model C is a single -story unit. The site will share ingress and egress with the mobile home park that abuts the project to the north and west. A new traffic signal will be constructed to aide access to both the project site and to the mobile home park. The project was designed to conform to the development requirements outlined in the Development Code for the Low -Medium Residential District. The Development Code does not give specific development criteria for condominium projects within the Low -Medium Residential District. This in turn, makes it difficult for the project to meet the setback requirements that are measured from the property lines when a condominium project, by its nature, does not have internal property lines. To overcome the issue, the applicant was directed by staff to meet the intent of the Development Code. This was accomplished by the project meeting the required side and rear setback as measured from the 6 -foot high block walls surrounding the private yard areas of each unit. The overall project meets the front yard setback from Archibald Avenue. To overcome the reduced front yard setback for the individual units, the applicant was required to double the required on-site guest parking spaces. Each unit also includes two private enclosed parking spaces. The project exceeds F1—Pg21 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00523/SUBTT17444/DRC2005-00250—CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 3 the Private, Common and Usable Open Space area requirements. The project also includes a large open grass play area, a tot lot and barbecue facilities to meet the Recreation Facility requirement. B. Tentative Tract Mar) SUBTT17444: Concurrent with the Development Review application is Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The tract map proposes the subdivision of air space for residential condominium purposes, which will allow individual ownership of the homes and common ownership of the open space, parking, driveways, and landscaped areas. C. Development District Amendment DRC2005-00523: The General Plan land use designation for the subject site is Low -Medium Residential. The Development District Map designation for the site is Medium Residential. The applicant has requested that the site be developed under the Low -Medium zoning designation. In order to bring the Development District Map into conformance with the General Plan, the applicant has applied for a Development District Amendment. This change will give the site the same Development District designation as the mobile home park which the site shares ingress and egress and abuts on two sides. D. Minor Exception DRC2005-00522: The project includes an application for a Minor Exception to allow a 7 -foot high perimeter wall along Archibald Avenue. The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13. An acoustical analysis of the project site was completed and concluded that with a 7 -foot high perimeter wall along Archibald Avenue, the project would comply with the City's exterior residential noise standards of 60 dBA. The Planning Director will consider the approval of the Minor Exception following the Planning Commission's action on the related project applications. E. Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521: The applicant has submitted a request to remove 45 trees in order to accommodate the development of the site. An Arborist Report was prepared on May 17, 2005 which surveyed the site and found a total of 45 trees that qualify as Heritage Trees under the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. Of those trees, all but 6 trees have been recommended for removal because of their poor condition. The report recommends preserving 6 trees if they can be incorporated into the landscape design for the project. The Development Code requires that new developments plant 40 trees per acre of which 90 -percent must be 15 -gallon size trees and 10 -percent must be 24 -inch box size trees. To overcome the removal of the majority of mature trees on the site, the applicant will be required to plant 100 percent 24 -inch box size trees to meet the Development Code tree planting requirement. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Diaz) on February 6, 2007. At the meeting, the Committee members were concerned about insufficient guest parking and the aspects of the design of the homes. The applicant redesigned the project and the Committee reviewed the revised plans on July 3, 2007. Staff presented the revised drawings which satisfied all issues identified bythe Committee (Munoz, Stewart, Diaz) at which time they recommended approval. G. Grading Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Grading Committee on February 6, 2007, and the preliminary Grading Plan for the project was conceptually approved. F1—Pg22 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00523/SUBTT17444,/DRC2005-00250 —CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 4 H. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on January 6, 2007. The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolutions of Approval. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on August 11, 2006, to discuss the proposed project. Property owners within 300 feet were notified of the meeting and approximately 53 neighbors attended. Those in attendance did not raise any issues regarding the project and a number stated that they felt that the project would be a positive addition to the neighborhood. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. Staff required the applicant to post a large 4 -foot by 8 -foot Notice of Filing sign on the property, which was also used to post the City's public hearing notice. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, Development Review DRC2005-00250, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005- 00521 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Staff further recommends the approval of Development District Amendment DRC2005-00523 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Respectfully submitted, Jams R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT:TV/ge F1—Pg23 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00523/SUBTT17444/DRC2005-00250 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 5 Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Site Utilization Map Site Plan Conceptual Grading Plan Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 Conceptual Landscape Plan Building Elevations Floor Plans Exhibit H - Design Review Committee Action Agendas dated February 6 and July 3, 2007 Exhibit I - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Development District Amendment DRC2005-00523 Draft Ordinance for Development District Amendment DRC2005-00523 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17222 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2005-00250 F1—Pg24 %t£ -FARE ,.,... i ! m!G%G; L71 | / ` ƒ\}) .. , \ � /G;d%9!®P® . GR r I . p — %t£ -FARE G, i o ; U I L W � Qw� C ] >5n coo0 f- ---- as rruotOrn ih"—,-':=_mak-=_ --- t,F: I i 5 ea s LI - 9 H MIME R' 2 3 -s:x,. ?_RF ::}c -z ."-• ::.:: a• " z«'z F:€¢_= � 6 $ E E s k i Y.5 E' _.:E a^- 8�E ^. a•c^ aE >S e. S 1 4. ? :;Y ° teF:e x.�-. "6i5 ., e.g .> . qp ._." ? -: � 5'3Eii•sipg 5s d - z ;--.•: �: €ks 3c2 YY-a'•�S7A",q?�4A :i § .. ____ x [E ee.eeea[n ne E ss aA eaAaS eek yy°'�'A 9g:5,3S xs SS Vi Sea§;i 5? E3 �b EE�y Lx R�qd Y} Y'd a S1[Y ikr�Yk�kY �' �Y }'YZ =:Y 5x'x Y t "a a:5 a i oin �YiB S�3'� 4- 55-e ss''y,s 5. i p Y Yra :gs7 S a`1 y7 s °[]'s@@ s €- n Ft �sysn� r Ag ix&sE Sn. t s as 4xx x xS c! :zg iE Y.S ab bi.t 755535IS �•••- y,.5 A 6/&C EX,M,I,! Ii B F1 Pg26 s� i o ; U I L W � Qw� C ] >5n coo0 jl W W UZO >aa 1 I QU n I O N I i zmL) j G f- ---- as rruotOrn ih"—,-':=_mak-=_ --- t,F: I i 5 ea s LI - 9 H MIME R' 2 3 -s:x,. ?_RF ::}c -z ."-• ::.:: a• " z«'z F:€¢_= � 6 $ E E s k i Y.5 E' _.:E a^- 8�E ^. a•c^ aE >S e. S 1 4. ? :;Y ° teF:e x.�-. "6i5 ., e.g .> . qp ._." ? -: � 5'3Eii•sipg 5s d - z ;--.•: �: €ks 3c2 YY-a'•�S7A",q?�4A :i § .. ____ x [E ee.eeea[n ne E ss aA eaAaS eek yy°'�'A 9g:5,3S xs SS Vi Sea§;i 5? E3 �b EE�y Lx R�qd Y} Y'd a S1[Y ikr�Yk�kY �' �Y }'YZ =:Y 5x'x Y t "a a:5 a i oin �YiB S�3'� 4- 55-e ss''y,s 5. i p Y Yra :gs7 S a`1 y7 s °[]'s@@ s €- n Ft �sysn� r Ag ix&sE Sn. t s as 4xx x xS c! :zg iE Y.S ab bi.t 755535IS �•••- y,.5 A 6/&C EX,M,I,! Ii B F1 Pg26 s� zIL ! E _ If F IF Y Q la- Ij 7W � r•I U O GZ-1 i a 7l e a � p a. I v � Z III I 3'a'e LY3 i 1y I , r -j$ V1sIA 31MOM uar o i 3; I 4jkfi Fe33 1 illi i. �i4 I I It , e DCa r r r I zIL ! II! Q la- Ij 7W � r•I U O � p a. I v � Z III I uar o i ,,II� Y� 4} Y 3 \ i°56d I I 4iia 4. Yi=i%a I�'. 1 i is eo4 p_°L€ �I j I '.IJ I J I EJ( Y�� f-1 E�) X' '�' _ .� A,B,&C—F1$ Pg27 Py 14Log 1 PC io%oo-7 A,B,&C-F19-Pg28 p e E g pp 55L � s"Ei €5�ryy55 yi 5�@y.�.5S5ye�SfsrA�j� ;i .S �P. pp' t,.28YeF SG t:.•€iiyyz .8.....�t�YEY3..3Q r�Y x .......{: Yr _ 9�4 Y Milt S1iSAeEYC _._ � it 3�YE I:,t. }j I o{{[[tl AbF ei .B{�—R�YYii P�BE8P 6Yi aaA i!± x�Yi �QA g2 �9GSi ASCE r' YiA£ li �,I � 2b.11 W-0 qY i �gAs�A.�,? yyes"y I.: II }}a L�L�9 pSSpbepp2 sys y e.; s3E e.ekaY.IY P.ab€ I III �.feAal ete�,I �Yg6 ii � 'F �9gE vz59A Py 14Log 1 PC io%oo-7 A,B,&C-F19-Pg28 ry a ym a f+F 3V 1 1I'1 1I 1111 - ` w }ns HEF 10. 02'i£ mI its �¢ 4�yaY aaava _e.vev A•I ..+x.e.+..... .�e..a. ! lioi -i \ \ 1EI I 1 II I ! !- 1111 j� n li EI 1 If i i2 �;d ! I I vl e s 13 ea ix 1 z Ill " j U'E.CI S a-�s�ix wI;J �s{ elE _¢$IA �S [I tl..e sada ;81 cj I' �tiK Z L�I� Y! � �� ul�€I�s I 4E'c I I�� !E! f�1ra• � a six` ill �'l 111 �i F IIx a!'I sig 1�p GIs a€�s�!.� r5�lf%fF ss. '1 I��` e2 xzse 11z I 111 I.1 ell \\ G.I+I 41��i�� ♦ n c4. I ! �II 1 � �D � 1 lNNd 4'.L0.�' 9vItA'3ms3ll p.N EH ?c A, B, &C - ri iQ do 61,NO EH ?c A, B, &C - ri iQ D /1 RIGM ELEVATICry-AllERNATE_ c$b n e /1_£RONT EIEVAIIIXJ.ALICRNATE ^ LFI-Tp.EVATION-ALICpryATE & RFM ELEVATION-AGTERN•1)E MATER/AL LEOENO IVI°'•0� 19 I J •• u I u e/aaoouc/Ip Vv --1 u �llLM Homes Copy jiUBTT17a & oncanozuwso/ WEA] Te�efions 2 SLY/IEIFVAII(Xf O [IES Er VAIION ,0_�ROMEIEVATIW( (3) flFViE [VA)Iq D A .............. 'MO.,,IhIn YPw Eshhs (SGT..p, 6 ORcno,002,, 'X20f.B1 s� n L LU w r1 weH1 PfEVATION-ALTERNATE__ /� _;�FN£L'CVAiION-ALTERNATE. F CWTEIWARON-ALTF.RNATF 03 _REARUEVAl10-ALTEWOTE 'Mmmlain Vi.n Es(Mes HLM1i Homoa Cory•. (BUBTif I46e6 ORG]OOS0045p) R.v'. A-20LB2 a - cFETELEvanav �F�ronrELEvanaY _ 0-R, G�x(ELEVATION - FEAFEAR ELEVATION ____ Vl„ ticn+xmn� co.R. (sUalw d6 (D _L7F(AM 0 0 -------- J -j (SUBTT174W� DRC2005-025, 'EA2 ------ — — — — — — — — — — — II U3 w (D _L7F(AM 0 0 -------- J -j (SUBTT174W� DRC2005-025, 'EA2 n of A, B, &C- Fl 8.Pg37 ltk . x : S A, B, &C- Fl 8.Pg37 03 nnp.� I I . Fam l�i j ril biW DRC200SO02501 .B2 CIC"L . r1 FINC.1 F-gyiN g! Tl� WVWIPW IWI TYPEB2 .B2 (D —Lol�" C D A Eslafes iiUwT17M I DRC200F0020) rYPE C Fl .. Pl.� —�Il N DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Louis Le Blanc February 6, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005 00250 - CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - A project to construct a 13 -unit detached condo development on 2.17 acres in the Medium Residential Zone (8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 0202-131-27, 61, and 62. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17444 - CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - A Tentative Tract Map for condominium purposes to create a 13 -unit condominium development in the Medium Residential Zone (8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 0202-131-27, 61, and 62. Design Parameters: The project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Victoria Street - APN: 202-131-27, 202-131-61, and 202-131-62. The project consists of 13 detached homes to be subdivided and sold as condominiums with common and private areas. All elevations exhibit wall' movement providing relief and visual interest to the wall planes. The applicant is proposing a total of 3 models, 2 of which are two-story models and one single -story floor model. All 3 models will use stucco as a primary material. Model Numbers A-1 and C will have a band of stack stone veneer around the building and entryways. Model Number A-2 will have a band of real river rock around the building and entryways, plus wood siding and wood accent trim to compliment architecture. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. There are no major issues. Secondary Issues: Additional guest parking should be explored. It is staff's opinion that the site needs additional guest parking or design the units to have longer driveways that will provide additional temporary parking. . Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the project with all major issues resolved and recommends review and approval by the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Diaz Staff Planner: Louis Le Blanc The plans were reviewed by the Committee and the item was continued to give the applicant time to respond to the following comments. Issues raised by the Design Review Committee included the pc IL -)/iv/ 7 E AX HIEIT A, B, &C-FT1Pg40 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2005-00250 AND SUBTT17444 February 6, 2007 Page 2 following: 1) add (double) the required amount of visitor parking, including required disabled parking space, 2) list and identify on-site recreational amenities for the project, 3) re -study and modify the proportions of window size/shapes relative to large stucco planes on all models and at the front/rear (major gable ends) of unit A2, 4) eliminate the use of single -shutter applications on the building elevations to avoid an unbalanced appearance, and 5) correct exterior notes to indicate the use of natural river rock where proposed (no manufactured river rock veneer allowed). A, B, &C-F*P2Pg41 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:50 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag July 3, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17444 - CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 2.17 acres for the purpose of creating a 13 unit condominium development in the Medium Residential District, located on the south of Victoria Street and west of Archibald Avenue - APN: 202-131-27, 61, and 62. Related Files: Development Review DRC2005-00250, Zone Change DRC2005-00523, Variance DRC2007-00390, Minor Exception DRC2005-00522. Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00331. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00250 -CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a 13 unit detached condominium project on 2.17 acres in the Medium Residential District, located on the south side of Victoria Street and west of Archibald Avenue -APN: 0202-131-27, 61, and 62. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, Zone Change DRC2005-00523, Variance DRC2007-00390, Minor Exception DRC2005-00522, Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00331. Design Parameters: The project consists of 13 detached homes to be subdivided and sold as condominiums with common and private areas. All elevations exhibit wall movement providing relief and the visual interest to the wall planes. The applicant is proposing a total of 3 models, 2 of which are two- story models and one single -story floor model. All 3 models will use stucco as a primary material. Model Numbers Al and C will have a band of stack stone veneer around the building and entryways. Model Number A2 will have a band of real river rock around the building and entryways, plus wood siding and wood accent trim to compliment architecture. Background: The project first went to the Design Review Committee on February 6, 2006. At that time staff was concerned that there was insufficient guest parking. The Design Review Committee agreed with staff and required that the applicant double the amount of guest parking. The applicant complied and has doubled the amount of guest parking from 5 spaces to 10 spaces. The Committee also asked the applicant to make the following design changes: 1) list and identify on-site recreational amenities for the project; 2) redesign the windows on all models and the front and rear elevations on Model A2 in order to reduce the current large stucco planes which give the homes an unbalanced appearance; 3) eliminate the use of single -shutter applications; 4) use real river rock instead of river rock veneer. The applicant has complied with all of the Committee's requirements as follows: 1) they have added recreational amenities to the Site Plan' 2) they added additional windows to the side elevations of Models A and B and added a hip -on -gable roof to the front an rear elevations of Model A2; 3) they have eliminated all single -shutter applications; 4) they will only use real river rock when river rock is called out. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. There are no major issues Secondary Issues: All secondary issues have been resolved A,B,&C-F?3Pg42 DRC ACTION AGENDA July 3, 2007 Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Staff believes that the applicant has complied with all of the design changes outlined by the Committee and recommends approval as submitted. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Lou Munoz, Michael Diaz Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag The Design Review Committee accepted the project as presented except for the request to remove window shutters from selected windows on each model. A, B, &C- Fi4 Pg43 RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17444, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 2.17 ACRES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING A 13 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PERACRE). THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0202-131-27. 61 AND 62. A. Recitals. 1. Creative Design Associates filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, as described in the title of this Resolution. However, a Development District Amendment has also been submitted that would amend the designation to Low -Medium residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of October 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing October 10, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at the on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street; and b. The subject site slopes generally from north to south and has 45 trees of various species; and C. The properties to the north and west of the subject site are developed with a mobile home park; the properties to the south are developed with single-family homes; and the property to the east is developed with apartments; and d. The application is to subdivide approximately 2.17 acres of land into 13 detached condominiums; and e. The site will share access from Archibald Avenue with the neighboring mobile home park. F1—Pg44 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative tract map is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds thatthere is no substantial evidence that the projectwill have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. F1—Pg45 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 3 d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Final recordation of tract map conditioned on approval by the City Council of Development District Map Amendment DRC2005-00523. 2) All pertinent conditions of approval for Development Review DRC20D5-00250 shall apply. 3) Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521 is hereby approved for the removal of up to 45 trees of various species. If any of the 6 trees outlined in the arborist report can be incorporated into the Landscape Plan for the project, the applicant shall protect the trees with a barrier as outlined in the arborist report. Because of Borer beetle infestation, all Eucalyptus tree wood shall be chipped, removed, and buried at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of 6 months, sealing the tarp edges with soil, to prevent emerging Borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood. The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live Borer beetles, or their larvae, in trucks or trailers is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714.5. 4) Trees shall be planted at a quantity of 40 trees per acre. All trees shall be minimum 24 -inch box size trees. 5) All perimeter walls shall be decorative and have a uniform design that is compatible with those in the area. Engineering Department 1) Archibald Avenue is a City "Major Arterial." Development will be required to install improvements along the full frontage on Archibald Avenue to City standards, extending south to Monte Vista Street and north of the driveway (street type entry) at Victoria Street including, but not limited to, curb and gutter at 36 feet from centerline of Archibald Avenue, AC pavement to centerline of street, curvilinear sidewalk, primary and secondary access, street lights and street trees. All Public improvements to be in accordance with the City's "Major Arterial" street design standards. a) Provide primarysite ingress/egress access from the joint use driveway along the northerly property line in accordance with City "Driveway Policy," aligned centerline to centerline with Victoria Street. This entry F1—Pg46 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 4 is a street type and will include cross gutter, pavement, curb returns with radius per City Standard No. 100-B and access ramps. b) Provide secondary drive approach access in accordance with City "Driveway Policy" and Standard No. 101 Type C (drive approach entry). c) Provide traffic signing and striping on Archibald Avenue as required. d) Provide R-26 "NO -PARKING" signs and additional traffic signing and striping as required by the City Engineering Traffic Section. e) Curvilinear sidewalk shall remain within street right-of-way and cross drive approach at the zero -inch curb face. f) Complete street improvements south to Monte Vista Street, including curb return with single access ramp. Provide an ADA compliant access ramp on each of the Monte Vista Street corners. g) Provide a new storm drain catch basin on west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Monte Vista Street. h) Relocate the existing catch basin on the west side, north of the new joint use driveway. 2) Development will be required to install all missing frontage improvements on Monte Vista Street including street trees, curb return, sidewalk, and access ramps per Condition 1.f. above. 3) Remove an existing headwall at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista Street and replace with a local storm drain system to serve the mobile home park and other areas to the north that are tributary to this site. The storm drain should be placed under the project drive aisles and sized to handle developed capacity from all tributary areas. The trees cannot be planted within 5 feet of the storm drain line. Provide catch basins on Archibald Avenue (Conditions 1.g. and 1.h. above). Provide for Q100 secondary surface overflow in case the local storm drain pipe should become filled to capacity or blocked. Surface overflow shall drain across this site to Archibald Avenue. Curbside drain outlets through the right-of-way may be necessary. Surface overflow system shall be designed to handle the Q100 event, and the pond depth can be no greater than 12 inches in automobile parking areas. a) In case of blockage at the proposed storm drain headwall inlet structure, Grading Plan shall be revised as necessary (including pad/FF elevations) during the building permit plan check period to produce flow line, top -of -curb grades, rate of slope and other to maintain secondary surface overflow within project drive aisle until outlet to public street. b) Backwater ponding effect at the headwall shall not occur on the adjacent property. Any backwater ponding shall only occur on-site per the revised final drainage study analysis. F1—Pg47 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 —CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 5 c) Storm drain and surface overflow easements shall be dedicated to the City. 4) Final drainage study shall address: a) Headwall considerations in Condition 3 above. b) Overflow route across project to Archibald Avenue on Monte Vista Street in the event of headwall inlet blockage. c) Determine actual tributary area currently reaching this facility (interim condition) in the absence of future MPSD planned for Amethyst Avenue and Lemon Avenue, and whether interim condition warrants mitigation measures. d) Determine ultimate tributary area and design requirements 5) It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Zone A designation removed from the project area. The developershall provide drainage and/orflood protection facilities sufficientto obtain an un -shaded zone "X" designation for the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all the necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/ hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) prior to approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) shall be issued by FEMA, prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. a) If the Federal Emergency Management Agency is unwilling to revise the Flood Insurance Rate Map, elevation certificates shall be provided for lots within the flood zone. 6) Lot 6 finish floor is lower than the adjacent drive aisle top -of -curb (to the north), located east of the proposed storm drain inlet headwall. This may direct overflow toward Lot 6 and this could be a potential flooding problem should the inlet become blocked. a) In accordance with Building and Safety typical lot grading, finish floor elevation should be set no less than 2 percent from the highest adjacent top of street curb plus one-half foot (check with Building and Safety Department). 7) Dual wall scenario shown in Grading Plan Section C -C could force inlet overflows onto the adjacent property to the south. Provide method of draining area between walls and/or accepting cross lot drainage from the adjacent site. 8) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the project CC&Rs. F1—Pg48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 6 9) Ultimate street right-of-way for Archibald Avenue, measured from centerline of street, is currently showing 53.2 feet. This shall remain and provide/obtain additional easement(s) for the main Archibald Avenue ingress/egress entry to facilitate the street type entry as required and for traffic signal equipment. 10) All existing overhead utilities fronting this development shall be undergrounded and/or removed in accordance with City requirements. 11) This developer shall install and maintain private landscaping as well as street trees within the parkways on Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista Street, fronting this development. 12) In addition to other Engineering fees, a non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated cost of operating all street lights during the first 6 months of operation, prior to building permit issuance or approval of the final map, whichever occurs first. 13) A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate landscape and lighting districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 14) Provide public storm drain overflow easement on final map (12 feet minimum for pipe, but overflow may require more). Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions., The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per man ufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low -emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. F1—Pg49 PLANNING COMMISSION SUBTT17444 — CREATIVE October 10, 2007 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 DESIGN ASSOCIATES 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel -powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources 1) Preserve or relocate the following trees: F1—Pg50 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 —CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 8 • 3 Jeffrey Pine Trees identified as trees 16, 17, and 18 in report. • 1 Canary Island Date Palm identified as tree 31 in report. • 1 Eucalyptus Lemon Scented Gum identified as tree 32 in report. • 1 Coast Live Oak identified as tree 33 in report. 2) One hundred percent of the trees to be planted to meet the City's 40 trees per acre requirement shall be minimum 24 -inch box size trees. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition orsignificant modification withoutan opportunity forthe Cityto establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: F1—Pg51 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 9 • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notifythe monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Hydrology and Water 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods F1—Pg52 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 10 experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by W & W Technologies on April 27, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. F1—Pg53 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 11 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 5) Construct a continuous 7 -foot high solid wall with no openings or gaps along the entire Archibald Avenue frontage at the 45 -foot setback from the curb -face and wrapping around at the north and south ends to a distance to be determined by final acoustical report. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2007. PLANNING ME RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: r�" R, j,""') Jam y R. Troyer, AICP, Secreta I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of October 2007, by the following vote -to -wit: F1—Pg54 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 12 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE F1—Pg55 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2005-00523, SUBTT17444, DRC2005-00250, AND DRC2005-00522 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the (Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Report) for the above -listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 F1—Pg56 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2005-00523, SUBTT17444, DRC2005-00250, AND DRC2005-00522 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessaryfunds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used bythe City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. F1—Pg57 7 z u a MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTT17444 and DRC2005-00250 Applicant: Eric Chen Creative Design Assoc. Initial Study Prepared by: Tabe van der Zwaaa Date: October 10 2007 I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Meg&jd of Verified Sanctions for .Mitigation Measures No. implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification VerifiF I ation Date /Initial; Non -C ompliance Quality construction equipment shall be maintained in good PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 erating condition so as to reduce operational Fal issions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction uipment is being properly serviced and maintained as " per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. — Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low -emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 11.13. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. 1 of 8 RMitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for r ,Iffiplementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance BO C Review of plans A 4 with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction i SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. ua Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 U, to haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control' Board [RWQCB]) dailyto reduce PMIO emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMIO emissions. The construction contractorshall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible, The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipmentwhen not in use. 2of8 Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Mitigation Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources Preserye or relocate the following trees: PD B Review of Plans C 2 • Three Jeffrey Pine Trees identified as trees 16, 17, and 18 in report: • One Canary Island Date Palm identified as tree 31 in report. • One Eucalyptus Lemon Scented Gum Identified as tree 32 in report. T v One Coast Live Oak identified as tree 33 in rn report. 0 One hundred percent of the trees to be planted to meet PD B Review of Plans C 2 the City's 40 trees per acre requirement shall be minimum 24 -inch box size trees. Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sitesPD/BO C Review of report from demolition or significant modification withoutan opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological „ value. OM. Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for ,Mitigation �lmp!ementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date Consider establishing provisions to require PD/BO C Review of report AID 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA - guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, PQ C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent i archiving. any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal PD B Review of report A/D 4 ssils) are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i. e., ' paleontological monitoring) that maybe appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and PD B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Miiigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date flnitials Non -Compliance ,iementjn�g Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO BIG Review of report A!D 4 or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for PD D Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transferto an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho PD D Review of report D 3 : -I Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County - Museum. Geology and -Sails ' The site shall be treated with water or. other BO C During A 4 soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction RWQCB) dailyto reduce PMjo emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PMIo construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMjo emissions from construction the site during such episodes. _ Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 5 of 8 Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permitapplicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures ata minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on- sZi e or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a Vecified time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. During construction, to remove pollutants, streetcleaning BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 will be performed prior to storm events and after the use _. of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by W &W Technologies on April 27, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling BO BIC/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall CE BIC/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (oMPs) thatwill be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Construction or grading shall nottake place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 5:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including construction Saturday, or at anytime on Sunday or a national holiday. 7 of 8 Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A A - With Each New Development 4 standards specified in Development Code Section PD- Planning Director or designee B- Prior To Construction construction 2- Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE- City Engineer or designee C- Throughout Construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The 3- Withhold Certificate of occupancy BO- Building Oficial or designee D - On Completion D- Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Slop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chler or designee 6 - Revoke CUP level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed asearlyas PD C During A A possible in the first phase. construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including construction Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extentfeasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Construct a continuous 7-foot high solid wall with no PD C During Plan A 4 openings or gaps along the entire Archibald Avenue Check frontage at the 45-foot setback from the curb-face and wrapping around at the north and south ends to a distance to be determined by final acoustical report. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions _ CDD - Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD- Planning Director or designee B- Prior To Construction B- Other Agency Permit l Approval 2- Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE- City Engineer or designee C- Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3- Withhold Certificate of occupancy BO- Building Oficial or designee D - On Completion D- Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Slop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chler or designee 6 - Revoke CUP /:\plan ning\Rnal\cega\mmchklst-revs 2-4-06f inal.doc 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT J DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2005-00250 AND SUBTT17444 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES LOCATION: WEST SIDE OFARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET— APN: 0202-131-27, 61 AND 62 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Tentative Tract No. SUBTT17444 is granted subject to the approval of DRC2005-00250. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 07-59, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this projectAll checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 b) Notice of Determination - $50 c) Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 X d) Environmental Impact Report - S2,550 SC -1-05 I:\PLANNING.FIN.4L\PLNGCO,�,iMP2C07 Res G Sa R.f DRC2005-CO2505t -CGpQq§-70.doc Completion Date —/—/. 'Jett No. SUaTT17444 AND DRC2005-00250 Completion Date 5. Crime Free Multi -Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi -Family Housing Program B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. 2. Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. S. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval priorto the issuance of building permits. 10. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 2 F1—Pg67 I: PLFNIN!.�IG.F!NAU%PLNGCOI:IMd-9007 R=s 5 Sti R00.DRC2005-'M50StdC0nd 10-10.dor —/__J- -/—/ —/—/ /—/- -/—/- -/—/- -/—/- -/—/- -/—/- '1dc, N3. SU -37 1741A4 AND DRC2005-0150 Completion Date 11. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. _/_/_ 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 14. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape _/_/_ maintenance shall be suWitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 15. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 16. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 17. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 18. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than woad fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 19. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 20. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 21. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5 -foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5 -foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 22. For residential development; recreation area/facility shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 3 F1—Pg68 I:\PLANN!NG',FINAL\PLNGCOrdfd-9007 Res & S:f Rpt\DRC2005-00250SWCond 10-10.doc h\PLANNIIJC',FWAL\PLNGCOdAPd:200iRes a SrR;P.DRC2 F1-Pg69 005-00250St- -ond 10-1 o.doc Iles! No. SUP -1 1;=44 ANC DRC2005-0G450 Completion Date D. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted, trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. A minimum of 40 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project. 4. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a irrigation permanent system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15 -gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5 -gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, inspection an shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 7. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 8. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. 9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 10. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. 11. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. h\PLANNIIJC',FWAL\PLNGCOdAPd:200iRes a SrR;P.DRC2 F1-Pg69 005-00250St- -ond 10-1 o.doc eject No. SUBTT17444 AND DRC2005-00250 Completion Date E. Environmental 1. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigatior measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on- and off-site, A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to fina occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation m easures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 4. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $ 538 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 5. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. F. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi -family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; 1:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOPAPA\2007 Res &. St, Rpt\DRC2005-0025ELCor5700-t0.dpc —/—/— i jest No. SUBm 7=44 AND DRC20o5-0021-0 Completion Date d. Ceiling, Roof, and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Ceiling, Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTT17444 and DRC2005-00250) -clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. _/_/_ 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (LEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. H. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., SUBTT17444 and DRC2005-00250 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. The Building and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tract/parcel map ��_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. I. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances / / considering use, area, and fire -resistiveness. --- 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. I:\PLANNING\PINAL\PLNGCOfAFA`2007 Res G Stf Rpf\DRC2005-0025Eg'LMPC rJ 117-10.doc ^ act NO. SUM—, 17444 AND DR02005-00250 F1—Pg72 1:1PLANNING..FIN=LIPLNGCOPAPh'-2007 Res & S4 RP`.tDRC2005-00250StdCond 10-10.doc Completion Data 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. Note on title sheet that plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved prior to construction. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department if you have any questions about the procedure at (909) 477-2710. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 50 total feet on Archibald Avenue 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 3. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. 4. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 5. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 6. Easements for public sidewalks and future traffic signal equipment placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City at Victoria Street entry. F1—Pg72 1:1PLANNING..FIN=LIPLNGCOPAPh'-2007 Res & S4 RP`.tDRC2005-00250StdCond 10-10.doc "'ojcc; ho. SUET T 1744a A'JD 5RC2005-00250 L. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to; Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Street. Lights Trees Comm Trail Medlan Island Bike Trail Other Archibald Avenue X X (c) X X X (e) Monte Vista Street X I X X X (f) Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. e) Curbside drain outlet; (f) Access ramps 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, priorto final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer, 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. 8 qq 4\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOIAPA0007 Res & S Rpt\DRC2005-00250SWCoifd 0-10.doc Comoletion Data -!—/- -/—/ _J—/ riot No.. SUBTT! 7a9i AND DRC.2005 002s0 I. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names'shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet—(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. l Ul Ibl1ULllo11 routes fur aireel Trees; 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. M. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9 F1–Pg74 I:\PLANNIPIG\FIN4L\PLN800idfd12007 Res & S; -2.tNo SUBTTI7--c AND DRC2005-0Pj250 110p I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGC06Lb1L007 Res E SN Rpt\DRC2005-0025�SlaC7 591n7 -�-10.doc Completion Date 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Archibald Avenue. N. Drainage and Flood Control 1. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 2. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved bythe City Engineer prior to final 'map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 3. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 4. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its — — right-of-way. — 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls. O. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. P. General Requirements and Approvals 1. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be obtained prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: Street type driveway aligned with Victoria Street. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 110p I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGC06Lb1L007 Res E SN Rpt\DRC2005-0025�SlaC7 591n7 -�-10.doc - . `Ic. SUBTT1 =G A':7 DR'32005 :_Z03 CcmDletion Date 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD -1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD -2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 11 F1—Pg76 CIPLANNING\FINA PLNGCOIA>43007Rai 3 SP R?t,DRC2?05-00250S:dCond 10.10.doc s - .11 1 , Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District -- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS December 6, 2005 Mountain View Estates SWC Archibald and Victoria St SUBTT17444 and DRC2005-00250 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC -1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500 -feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250 -feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200 -feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: i. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. ii. At intersections. iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. V. A minimum of forty -feet (40') from any building. FSC -2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 -pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III -A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500 -foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. F1—Pg77 3. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 -feet of the proposed project site. FSC -4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: 1. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). 2. When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. FSC -6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access — Fire Lanes Standard 9-7. 1. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 -feet. b. The maximum inside tum radius shall be 20 -feet. c. The minimum outside tum radius shall be 46 -feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 -feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 -feet, 6 -inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 -feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 -degrees or 20 percent. In. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. L Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 -feet, 6 -inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 2. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1. The following design requirements apply: 2 F1—Pg78 t , a. All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device. The devices shall be digital. Analog devices are not acceptable. Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. b. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. c. The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate. d. A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. e. The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20 -minutes and shall automatically reset. 3. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 4. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FSC -9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FSC -13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS -14 Map Recordation 1. Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department access: a. Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant; or b. Crosses a property line; or C. Is shared by multiple owners; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owners association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to 3 F1—Pg79 recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal: a. The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement. b. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement. C. A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, tum radii and slope of roadway surface shall be provided. The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. Reciprocal Water Covenant, and Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant; or Crosses a property line; or C. Provide service to adjacent properties; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association; or e. Is shared by multiple owners. Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. FCS -15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-8 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. 4 F1—Pg80 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire, District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600 -foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard # 9-8 and #10-4. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14'6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. 6. Annexations: To the San Bernardino County Fire Department must be completed. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City. of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. F1—Pg81 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 9. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 10. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4 -inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 -feet, additional 4 -inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 11. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi -family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8 -inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non - illuminated 6 -inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi -tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites. 12. Hazardous Materials: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 13. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. F1—Pg82 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00523, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17444, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00250, AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2005-00522 Public Review Period Closes: October 10, 2007 Project Name: Project Applicant: Creative Design Associates Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street —APN: 0202-131-27. Project Description: A request to change the Development District Map from Medium Residential to Low -Medium Residential to bring the site into conformance with the General Plan Followed by a request to subdivide 2.17 acres for the purpose of developing a 13 -unit detached condominium development in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), and a request to build a wall 1 foot higher than the 6 foot maximum permitted by the Development Code in order for the residential development project to comply with the City's exterior residential noise standards. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00331 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477- 2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proped Mit review period. /� j October 10. 2007 Date of Determination Negative Declaration during the RESOLUTION NO. 17-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755, A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SUBTT17444) RELATED TO A 13 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON 2.17 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) DISTRICT (4 TO 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0202-131-27, 61 AND 62. A. Recitals. 1. Golden Avenue Development, Inc. filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On October 10, 2007, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 07-59, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. A State allowed extension (per SB 1185) extended the approval period 1 -year to October 10, 2011. 4. A State allowed extension (per AB 333) extended the approval period 2 -years to October 10, 2013. 5. A State allowed extension (per AB 208) extended the approval period 2 -years to October 10, 2015. 6. A State allowed extension (per AB 116) extended the approval period 2 -years to October 10, 2017; 7. On November 8, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on November 8, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby�jp%%Willy finds as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-91 TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755—GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 8, 2017 Page 2 a. The application applies to a 2.17 acre parcel -of land located the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street; and b. The property is within the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre). To the north and west is a mobile home park (Chaparral Heights) in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); to the east is single-family development in the Low Medium District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); and, to the south is single-family development in the Medium (M) District (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre); and C. The subdivision of the project site conforms to all applicable development standards of the Development Code for the Low Medium (LM) District; and d. This application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 for one (1) additional year. The time extension is necessary to allow time for the completion of a City sponsored storm drain project that will eliminate an Engineering Department requirement to construct an enlarged on-site storm drain system to carry storm water from the west and north of the project site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved tentative tract map is consistent with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, Ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. The proposed project is for the subdivision of 2.17 acres of land for condominium purposes for the construction of a 13 -unit multi -family development. The project site is within the Low Medium (LM) District which permits the construction of multi -family development; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed subdivision. The project site is surrounded by residential development of similar or greater intensity and is well suited for the proposed development; and C. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. An initial study was prepared for the original project that was approved by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2017, along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration, which reviewed potential environmental impacts created by the construction and operation of 13 multi -family units on the project site. Mitigation measures were included in the original approval reducing any potential impact to less than significant. A biological resource update letter (Recon; June 7, 2017) was submitted as part of the request for the time extension. The letter verifies that no native habitat types occur on-site and no federally listed species were observed or are expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable native habitats, level of disturbance that has occurred to the site and development of surrounding lands; and d. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed subdivision complies all development standards outlined in the Development Code for multi -family projects within the Low Medium (LM) District; and e. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. State law allows for one (1) year tipr_p4g5sions. PLANNING COMMISSION ,<ESOLUTION NO. 17-91 TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755— GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 8, 2017 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The biological resource update letter dated June 7, 2017, concludes that no direct or indirect impact to federal listed species are anticipated from the project or the related tentative map time extension. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension. The new expiration date for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 is October 10, 2018. 6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 07-59 and incorporated Standard Conditions in Resolution 07-59 for SUBTT17444 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2017-00755, except for Engineering Department Condition of Approval 5a, which is no longer applicable and the addition of the following Condition of Approval: If the applicant for this project chooses to wait for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct a public storm drain system and remove the proposed project from the flood plain as determined by FEMA, the applicant shall as a condition of approval for the project accept all remaining off-site storm water flows from the adjacent upstream property(ies). The storm water flows shall be conveyed through the project as a privately maintained storm drain system and shall connect to a public storm drain system in Archibald Avenue. The inlet system to intercept the off-site storm drain flows shall be a privately maintained curb type catch basin within the project boundary. All off-site improvements shall be coordinated with the adjacent property owner(s). F1—Pg86 PLANNING COMMISSION <ESOLU T ION NO. 17-91 k TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755— GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 8, 2017 Page 4 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: �X I Cand c Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adoptedby the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of November 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS. MUNOZ. OAXACA NONE WIMBERLY NONE F1—Pg87 RESOLUTION NO. 18-77 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816, A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SUBTT17444) RELATED TO A 13 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON 2.17 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4 TO 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0202-131-27, -61 AND -62. A. Recitals. 1. Golden Avenue Development, Inc. filed an application for a time extension to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On October 10, 2007, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 07-59, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. The State extended the approval period for SUBTT17444 one (1) -year to October 10, 2011 per SB 1185. 4. The State extended the approval period for SUBTT17444 two (2) -years to October 10, 2013 per AB 333. 5. The State extended the approval period for SUBTT17444 two (2) -years to October 10, 2015 per AB 208. 6. The State extended the approval period for SUBTT17444 two (2) years to October 10, 2017. allowed extension per AB 116. 7. On November 8, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved a one (1) year time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBT717444, extending the approval period to October 10, 2018. 8. On November 28, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing for the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 9. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-77 TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816 — GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 28, 2018 Page 2 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on November 28, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 2.17 -acre parcel of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street; and b. The property is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre). To the north and west is a mobile home park (Chaparral Heights) in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); to the east is a single-family development in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); and, to the south is single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential District (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre); and C. The subdivision of the project site conforms to all applicable development standards of the Development Code for the Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and d. This application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 for one (1) additional year. The time extension is necessary to allow time for the completion of a City sponsored storm drain project, which will remove the project site from a Federal Emergency Management Agency flood zone and eliminate an Engineering Department condition of approval to construct an enlarged on-site storm drain system to carry storm water from the west and north of the project site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the City's current General Plan, Municipal Code, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. The proposed project is for the subdivision of 2.17 acres of land for condominium purposes for the construction of a 13 - unit multi -family development. The project site is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District which permits the development of multi -family projects with a density of 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The approved 13 -unit multi -family development on the project site has a density of approximately 6 dwelling units per acres; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed subdivision. The project site is surrounded by residential development of similar or greater intensity and is well-suited for the proposed development. The project site has access to a public street and all public utilities are located adjacent to the project site; and C. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. An initial study was prepared for the original project that was approved by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2007, along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration, which reviewed potential environmental impacts created by the construction and operation of 13 -unit multi -family development on the project site. Mitigation measures were included in the original approval reducing any potential impacts to less than significant; and F1—Pg89 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-77 TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816 — GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 28, 2018 Page 3 d. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed subdivision complies with all development standards outlined in the Development Code for multi -family projects within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District including density, setbacks and design; and e. The time extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. State law allows for one (1) year time extensions. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. In June of 2017. a biological resource update letter was submitted as part of the request for the previous one (1) year time extension request. The June 2017 letter states that no native habitat types occur on-site, and no federally listed species were observed or are expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable native habitats, level of disturbance that has occurred to the site, and development of surrounding lands. No direct or indirect impact to federal listed species are anticipated from the project or the related tentative map time extension. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension. The new expiration date for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 is October 10, 2019. F1—Pg90 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-77 TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816 — GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 28, 2018 Page 4 6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 07-59 and incorporated Standard Conditions in Resolution 07-59 for SUBTT17444 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2018-00816, except for Engineering Department Condition of Approval 5a, which is no longer applicable with the addition of the following Condition of Approval: If the applicant for this project chooses to wait for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct a public storm drain system and remove the proposed project from the flood plain as determined by FEMA, the applicant shall as a condition of approval for the project accept all remaining off-site storm water flows from the adjacent upstream property(ies). The storm water flows shall be conveyed through the project as a privately maintained storm drain system and shall connect to a public storm drain system in Archibald Avenue. The inlet system to intercept the off-site storm drain flows shall be a privately maintained curb type catch basin within the project boundary. All off-site improvements shall be coordinated with the adjacent property owner(s). The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA go ATTEST: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of November 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: F1—Pg91