Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-05-28-Agenda Packet-PC-HPC .I a THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF ;CHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 28, 2014 0 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California rl= I. CALL TO ORDER oPledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell_ Vice Chairman Fletcher Munoz_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca_ i II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to rive minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. DIII. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AV HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MAY 28, 2014 CI°1VOA Page 2 A. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated April 23, 2014 B. Approval of Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) Minutes dated April 23, 2014 C. RECOMMENDATION TO QUITCLAIM VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS FOR LOT 15 OF TRACT MAP 9324, ALONG CARNELIAN STREET, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET SOUTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD—APN: 1061-671-28. RELATED FILE: DRC2014-00030. D. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15. IV. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION E. ORAL UPDATE TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ON THE RESTORATION OF THE CUCAMONGA SERVICE STATION LOCATED AT 9670 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD—APN: 0208-153-05. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION. The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign In after speaking. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014- 00205 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A supplement to Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) amending Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to clarify definitions,administrative procedures and correct prior errors and omissions. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19505 - ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC - A request to subdivide a 0.29 acre parcel into two lots for a site located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue in the Low(L)Residential Development District; APN: 0209-122-01. Related File: Variance DRC2014-00112. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AMM MAY 289 2014 C` oN`A Page 3 H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2014-00112-ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC - A request for a variance to reduce the minimum net average lot size in connection with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue in the Low(L)Residential Development District-APN: 0209-122-01. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19518-DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC: A proposal to subdivide a property comprised of nine(9)parcels with a combined area of about 375,000 square feet (8.61 acres) into three (3) parcels in conjunction with the modification of a previously approved industrial/warehouse complex in the General Industrial(GI)District located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-39 and -41 through -48. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00551 and SUBTPM18794 was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2010. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-01118, Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative O Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01118-DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC: A review of proposed modifications to a previously approved industrial/warehouse complex and architectural review of three(3)buildings on a property of about 904,000 square feet(20.7 acres)in the General Industrial(GI)District located about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street;APNs: 0209-151-38 through-48. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00551 and SUBTPM18794 was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2010. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration Related files: Development Review DRC20070- 00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-01120. K. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT DRC2013-01120 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC: A modification of Uniform Sign Program #221 for a partially constructed industrial/warehouse complex on a property of 20.7 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-38 through -48. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-0118, Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Minor Exception DRC2008-00152. O E . COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ' ftANCIM MAY 28, 2014 C01i1°'' Page 4 F=7 VII. AWOURNMENT 1,Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 22,2014,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours priorto the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MAY 28, 2014 Page 5 APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please tum off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us i, VicinityMap Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting May 28 , 2014 . 1 L-,_: • i� I �..i C C 2 f ` m E a o m t 26 x t c � 19th St Base Line Base Llne C Church Church tF�m Foothill = Foothill N 0. I B i L Arrow c c Arrow rsey r I 8this w i oc 6th W Alt a = _ � 4th * Meeting Location: IG, H City Hall/Council Chambers I' J. K] 10600 Civic Center Drive Item A: Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated April 23, 2014 Item B: Approval of Adjourned meeting Minutes dated April 23, 2014 Item D: Capital Improvement Program (citywide) Item E: Oral Report—Historic Gas Station Item F: Development Code Amendment(citywide) Items G, H, : SUBTPM19505, DRC2014-00112 +___ , , ei inrou4omR nit _9A43.fm%t_ nRC2013-01120 • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ;CHO THE MINUTES OF CUcAMoNCA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 23, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California rF I. CALL TO ORDER • Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 PM Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz X Wimberly_2L Oaxaca X Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager, Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Rebecca Fuller,Administrative Secretary;Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer,Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Mike Smith, Associate Planner, II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission mayreceive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain • from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. 1+e. A-1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Ho APRIL 23, 2014 ON(iA. Page 2 Luana Hernandez, Vice President of the Route 66/ECA spoke regarding ongoing improvements taking place at the Historic Gas Station. She noted that all the work has been done by volunteers and it has been a wonderful community effort. She invited everyone to stop by and see the changes. III. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS A. UPDATE ON WEST-SIDE AND SPECIAL LIGHTING DISTRICTS Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Vice Chairman Fletcher asked if there is much disparity of tax rates between the various districts. Ms. Sassoon said it is about $125-$250 per year per single-family home. In response to Chairman Howdyshell, she noted that any increase requires property owner approval and right now, the City is only in the conversation stage-a vote is in the future. She said she did not expect to see any changes take place until 2015-16 at the earliest. Vice Chairman Fletcher asked if there was a surplus in the General Fund account, could the City supplement a district to cover the shortfalls. Ms Sassoon explained that although the use of the funds would be allowable and legal it would also create an equity problem amongst the districts and begs the question if it would be fair to subsidize one district over and another. She said there is a portion of cost that has a general benefit that is therefore paid by the General Fund. Chairman Howdyshell thanked her for the great presentation and suggested selected slides from the presentation be placed on the RC Channel so residents will know where to go for more information. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION B. Approval of minutes dated March 26, 2013 Moved by, Fletcher, seconded by Wimberly, adopted 4-0-1 (Munoz abstain) I+n m A-7 r ® HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RmHO APRIL 23, 2014 Page 3 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION _.... .. _ . _... The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. C. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014-00206-DENNIS MYSKOW-A request for a historic landmark designation for a single-family residence in the General Industrial District located at 8803 Baker Avenue - APN: 0207-271-40. The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner, stated the applicant has asked that the project be • continued to a date non-specific. Commissioner Oaxaca asked if and when the application is approved what kind of burden is created for the property owner if he desires to make changes to the structure. Ms. Nakajima said the property owner can apply for a certificate of appropriateness if they desire to make changes. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said the Certificate of Appropriateness application adds an additional layer of review and the designation also makes them eligible to apply for Mills Act tax relief. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing, and seeing none, closed the public hearing. Moved by, Oaxaca, seconded by Wimberly, carried 5-0 to continue the item to an unspecified date. F=��__VI. - - PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION 771 The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by/aiN. the Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. D. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743 - KB HOME - A review of a proposal for 76 • single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved 76-lot subdivision of about 53 acres in the Very Low(VL)Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - Itam A_2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CRm APRIL 23, 2014 Page 4 APNs: 0225:191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, Variance 2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. On November 9, 2011 a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. Mike Smith, Associate Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation(copy on file). A comment regarding the removal of trees was received. Staff reported that the removal was previously approved and the trees will be replaced with the development. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Randy and Karen Milton stated they live in the Andalusia development. They expressed concern about traffic particularly in the mornings because of the schools. He said they have a difficult egress from their tract. He said they have trouble getting out of the Andalusia.tract as the light does not turn green to allow them to proceed. They also expressed concern about the fatality at East Avenue and Banyan. He said people already use their development to turn around and with the new development, he believes people will cut through and not have adequate time to slow down. Shareef Awad, 1231 W. Cactus Avenue, Suite D, Rialto CA said he is the new owner of the vacant land to the east of the proposed project. He said he is willing to work with them to help with this problem. He asked if the project would be on sewers or septic. Rudy Provoost of KB Homes said the tract was approved in 2011 and he can't do much about the traffic. Chairman Howdyshell asked what kind of study for traffic was done. Mr. Provoost said they purchased the approved tract from Chaffey and those studies were done prior to the purchase, so he was unaware. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said traffic impacts were already analyzed with the prior approval. He said the project before them now is the design of the housing product not the traffic. He said the sewer issue was also part of the prior approval. Seeing and hearing no further public comment, Chairman Howdyshell closed the public hearing. Commissioner Munoz acknowledged the traffic concerns and noted that Banyan can be totally open or totally backed up;the traffic study was done previously and the traffic meets the acceptable standards. He said he is pleased with the single story ratio, and said he Item A-4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES _%cH0 APRIL 23, 2014 L'"+"°NCA Page 5 likes the size and design of the homes. Commissioner Wimberly echoed his comments regarding the traffic and design. He said he looks forward to seeing the project. Commissioner Oaxaca said traffic is fluid and varies hour to hour and the traffic studies have been done. He said the traffic issues expressed this evening are about-existing conditions and that we cannot require this project/developer to fix it as it creates an equity issue. He said he likes the architecture and design of the homes and expressed his support of the project. Vice Chairman Fletcher noted the applicant worked with staff and met all the requirements of the Etiwanda area. He said at their first visit to the DRC they only had a few design issues which they corrected. He said the design and articulation of the roof wall planes looks good. ® Chairman Howdyshell said Banyan seems to be the corridor for all the schools. She said new development does impact traffic, however the project met the standards. She said she is pleased with the number of single-story homes. She said the Option of a casita is something many buyers want. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Wimberly, carried 5-0 to adopt Resolution 14-14 approving Development Review DRC2013-00743 as presented by staff. VII. - COMMISSION CONCERNSMISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Vice Chairman Fletcher welcomed back Commissioner Munoz. His sentiments were echoed by the other Commissioners and staff. FIF� VIII. ADJOURNMENT 7:55 PM The Planning Commission immediately adjourned to a Workshop to discuss Pre- Application Review DRC2014-00136. The workshop was held in the Rains Room.and those minutes will appear separately. Item A—S HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CR Ho APRIL 23, 2014 orru�oxo,► Page 6 INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker.- If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday,7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us Item A-6 • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKSHOP MINUTES OF ;CHO CUC.AMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 23, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center . RAINS ROOM 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL To ORDER Roll Call 8:10 PM Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz X Wimberly X Oaxaca X Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager,Rebecca Fuller,Administrative Secretary;Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer;Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary Mike Smith, Associate Planner II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to rive minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,making loud noises,or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. • None Itam R_1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES C;gmc °" APRIL 23, 2014 Page 2 III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00136 - SRM DEVELOPMENT: A request for a Planning Commission Workshop review of a conceptual site plan for a facility that provides independent, assisted living, and memory care housing on the undeveloped portion of a property of 9.5 acres that is partially developed with a church(Highland Avenue Community Church)in the Low(L)Residential District at 9944 Highland Avenue-APN: 0201-05549. Mike Smith, Associate Planner, gave a brief overview of the project site and zoning with a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He reviewed the definition of a Residential Care Facility, and the Allowed Land Use Table in Section 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code. He said a zoning change would be needed as well as a CUP. The applicant team, including Andy Loos of SRM Development, Ryan Leong of SRM Development and Brad Buller, of Land Matters, provided a brochure about SRM Development. Mr. Loos said they are under contract to purchase the noted property. He presented a conceptual plan for the project highlighting their desire to develop a senior care facility with independent and assisted living (excluding nursing care). In response to Vice Chairman Fletcher, Mr. Loos confirmed the facility will be separate from the church. In response to Chairman Howdyshell, Mr. Leong confirmed there would be security 24 hours a day and that the memory care section would be alarmed and totally secured. He said visitors will have to check in at the reception desk first. He said no staff will be residing on site. Mr. Leon said the kitchens make the units feel like a home although residents are paying for their meals and most choose not to cook. He said there are no dishwashers as people tend not to use them. He said most residents don't want to shop or prepare meals-it is a major reason they move in to the facility. Commissioner Wimberly said the product looks nice, the site appears workable, the price points are similar to other similar facilities in the area and it appears it would fit -.vell into the community-although traffic will have to be considered. Commissioner Munoz echoed the comments and suggested the applicants work with staff through the process and asked what would be done with the athletic area currently located on the north portion of the property (being used by the church). Itom R-7 PNM HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES APRIL 23, 2014 Page 3 Brad Buller, Land Matters, said the church will relocate it to other portion of the church site. In response to Commissioner Oaxaca, Mr. Leong said the project has few impacts- there are no school needs, and only a few residents will be drivers, therefore they believe enough parking is provided. Commissioner Oaxaca said he would be comfortable with the location of the use and a said it is good use for a remnant parcel. In response to Vice Chairman Fletcher, Mr. Loos said they had 78 properties that they owned and managed, but the properties in the south and east have been sold off and they now have about 20 in Washington and California. He said a set • number of meals are included in the rent and the meal service is governed by the State. Vice Chairman Fletcher said he believes it is an ideal spot; there are buffers on all sides and the parking provided is not an issue. He said he has no objection to the use. Chairman Howdyshell said she believes this is the highest and best use for this parcel;there are minimal impacts, it is a quiet, ideal location. She said it is good for current residents to stay in Rancho Cucamonga. She suggested they bring in younger people to volunteer to keep the residents stimulated. Mr. Leong said this is the first facility to have a church next door. Mr. Buller said he appreciates working with Mr. Loos and Mr. Leong;this company brings a high level of quality to the table. IV. ADJOURNMENT 8:50 PM • If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Itam R_2 ti HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES cHo me, APRIL 239 2014 Page 4 INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." . Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director, AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours,Monday through Thursday,7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.,except for legal City holidays. AP_PEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us I+nrm R_A r STAFF REPORT • ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO DATE: May 28, 2014 C,'UCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO QUITCLAIM VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS FOR LOT 15 OF TRACT MAP 9324, ALONG CARNELIAN STREET LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET SOUTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD —APN 1061-671-28 RELATED FILE: DRC2014-00030 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the finding, through minute action, that this quitclaim is in conformance with the General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. • BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS A resident at 8691 Dresden Court submitted an application for a second drive approach on the west side of Camelian Street south of Hillside Road. Upon review of application, it was discovered that the recorded Tract Map 9324, shows non-vehicular access on the west side of Carnelian Street where the proposed approach is to be located. Vehicular access is allowed on the east side of Carnelian Street. The Subdivision Map dedicates vehicular access rights to the City. The dedication of vehicular access rights to the City means anyone requesting a new drive approach would have to apply for a quitclaim of those rights to the City Council. The Traffic Engineering Division reviewed and recommends a drive approach at this location with conditions to vacate said access restriction. Because the residences currently have access to their property, the quitclaiming of this segment of vehicular access rights on Camelian Street will not increase vehicular traffic on Carnelian Street. Respectfully submitted, Dan James Senior Civil gineer DJ/CC:ls ® Attachments: Exhibit "A"-Vicinity Map Item C-1 -r M I-' ow Pik 1 ' 8691 Dresden ct ._Is Aj IIV� IL J STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 7 Date: May 28, 2014 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Principal Civil Engineer . � Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY O RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that by minute action the Planning Commission find the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2014/15 in conformity with the adopted General Plan. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as attached as Exhibit "B" is required per Government Code 65401, Exhibit "A", to be adopted by the City Council. The Planning Commission is required to find the CIP in conformity with the adopted General Plan. The CIP is a vital piece of the City's Annual Operating Budget as it dictates major capital expenditures obligated in any given year. The CIP consists of a multi-year plan for citywide infrastructure improvements. • Each year,the City budgets for"funded"projects which will occur during said fiscal year. The list of projects contained in the CIP addresses both the City's long and short-term capital needs. It identifies projects that reflect the desires of the community, as well as projects that serve operational and maintenance needs. The City's Engineering staff works with all Departments within the City to develop and implement an economically feasible CIP that embodies the City's public infrastructure needs. The CIP is the product of joint planning, taken from the City's General Plan, local residents, the business community, the local development community, and external government agencies. The projects have been categorized by type of project(Beautification, Drainage, Facilities,etc.), which are in alphabetical order within each category. The individual project sheets include a short summary, cost, year funded, and a map showing the project location. Projects are funded from a variety of sources including Development Impact Fees, Measure "I", Gas Tax, and miscellaneous grants. There are 57 projects totaling just under $11,000,000 to be executed in the upcoming fiscal year. Apart from the 57 projects previously identified, 21 projects just under$89,000,000 are identified as future and unfunded. Respectfully submitted, M , Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Attachments: Exhibit"A"-Government Code 65401 • Exhibit"B"- Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Capital Improvement Program (distributed under separate cover) Item D-1 f Government Code WADI. If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, within such time as may be fixed by the legislative body, each county or city officer, department board, or commission, and each governmental body, commission, or board, including the governing body of any special district or school district, whose jurisdiction lies wholly or partially within the county or city, whose functions include recommending, preparing plans for, or constructing, major public works, shall submit to the official agency, as designated by the respective county board of supervisors or city council, a list of the proposed public works recommended for planning, .initlation or construction during the ensuing fiscal year. The official agency receiving the list of proposed pubic works shall list and classify all such recommendations and shall prepare a coordinated program of proposed public works for the ensuing fiscal year. Such coordinated program shall be submitted to the county or city planning agency for review and report to said official agency as to conformity with the adopted general plan or part thereof. EXHIBIT A Item D-2 J TO BE DISTRIBUTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER. • EXHIBIT B Item D-3 i I I ORAL PRESENTATION : UPDATE TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ® COMMITTEE ON THE RESTORATION OF THE CUCAMONGA SERVICE STATION Item E-1 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' Date: May 28, 2014 RANCHO C;UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00205 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A supplement to Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) amending Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to clarify definitions, administrative procedures and correct prior errors and omissions. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission make the following recommendations to the City Council: 1. Adoption of a Negative Declaration for Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205; and 2. Approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205. • BACKGROUND: On July 18, 2012, the City Council, on the recommendation of the Planning Commission, adopted the City's updated Development Code. The updated Development Code became effective on September 4, 2012. At the City Council hearing, staff proposed to present Code updates on a regular basis to deal with issues that were discovered after the Code became effective. Since September 2012, staff has presented three Code amendments to address errors and update regulations. The changes proposed in this amendment are mostly procedural in nature. They would: (1)reinstate development standards that were unintentionally omitted; (2) correct technical errors; (3) streamline the development review process and (4) clarify existing regulations. Staff is recommending two changes to the development review process. Prior to being heard by the Planning Commission, certain projects may be initially reviewed by one or more of the following Committees: (1) Grading Review; (2) Design Review; (3) Technical Review and (4) Trails Advisory Committee. These Committees are designated to review projects with specific focus areas and provide recommendations to the Planning Commission. These committees were established many years ago when the City was in a high-growth mode. Currently the grading review is performed by staff in the initial review process and once a project is deemed complete, is scheduled for review by the Grading Committee. Staff determines that once the Grading Plan is deemed complete it is technically ready for Planning Commission review and action. Therefore the review by the Grading Committee is an unnecessary required step of the process. As the City moves towards infill development and redevelopment of underutilized properties, streamlining this process will continue to make the development review process more effective and efficient. Therefore staff is proposing the elimination of the Grading Review Committee. • Item F-1 } PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2014-00205-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 28, 2014 Page 2 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES: Staff recommends the changes to the Development Code summarized below. Attachment 1 of the Resolution prepared for the Commission's consideration includes the actual text changes to the Development Code. Typographic errors are not included in the summary of proposed changes, but are included in the body of Attachment 1. Article I Administration 1. Grading Review Committee. Amend Section 17.04.020 to remove the Grading Review Committee as a review authority. 2. Technical Review Committee. Amend Section 17.04.020 to add the Public Works Department representative to the Technical Review Committee. Article II Land Use and Development Procedures 3. Site Development Review. Amend Section 17.16.100 to revise the applicability requirements for projects subject to a Site Development Review. There was some ambiguity in the language that was making more small residential projects subject to this review than was originally intended. 4. Minor Design Review. Amend Section 17.16.130 to reorganize the residential projects versus the commercial projects that are subject to a Minor Design Review. This is a clarifying amendment to the text. 5. Large Family Day Care. Add Section 17.16.150 to include purpose, applicability, review, and noticing requirements for Large Family Day Care applications. These requirements previously did not exist. 6. Grading Review Committee. Amend Sections 17.16.130, 17.16.140 and 17.20.040 to remove the Grading Review Committee from review. Article III Zoning Districts Allowed Uses and Development Standards 7. New Allowed Use-Microbrewery. Amend allowed use regulations in Table 17.30.030-1 to add Microbrewery as a permitted use in the Industrial Park(IP)and General Industrial (GI) Districts. This is a new use added based on several inquiries received by staff for small scale microbrewery operations. These are designed to be primarily the manufacturing of beer consistent with other small or medium manufacturing uses currently allowed within those districts. On-site tasting rooms may be allowed with a Conditional Use Permit. 8. Allowed Use Descriptions. Amend Section 17.32.020 as follows: Amend the definition of Bar/Nightclub to remove the references to brewpub or microbrewery and relocate those references to the definition of a restaurant, which is more consistent with their use. • Amend the definition of restaurant to correct a grammatical error and include brewpub and microbrewery with food service. Item F-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2014-00205-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 28, 2014 Page 3 • Add a definition for microbrewery as a manufacturing use. 9. Front Yard Setbacks. Amend Table 17.36.010-1 to reflect the front yard setback as an average setback that can vary by +/- 5 feet. This was unintentionally omitted from the Code. 10. Roof Mounted Air Conditioning Units. Amend Section 17.36.010 to allow for the replacement of existing roof mounted air conditioning units or the installation of new units out of public view. Article IV Site Development Provisions 11. Accessory Structures. Amend Table 17.42.040-1 as follows: • To remove the limitations for rear yard lot coverage for pools,spas, and pool accessories. • To limit the overall height of pool accessories (such as slides, diving boards, and grottos) to 8 feet. • To limit the lot coverage for decks and patios to 30% of the rear yard area. 12. Outdoor Display and Sales. Amend Section 17.60.030 B to clarify that a Conditional Use Permit is required for permanent outdoor display and sales greater than 10% of the gross floor area and that exemptions apply if all other Development Code requirements are met. • 13. Water Budget. Amend Section 17.82.040 to correct an error in the Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) used to establish a water budget. Article V Specific Use Requirements 14. Temporary Uses. Amend Section 17.104.040 as follows: to eliminate a redundancy in the text relating to temporary outdoor displays and sales of merchandise. This is a duplication of a section elsewhere in the Code. • To eliminate a redundancy in the text relating to temporary outdoor displays and sales of merchandise. This is a duplication of a section elsewhere in the Code. • To allow retail parking lot and sidewalk sales greater than 19 days per calendar year with a Conditional Use Permit. This allows businesses with regional or national outdoor sales events (i.e. tent sales) to have increased flexibility in the number of sale days. Article VII Design Standards 15. Commercial. Office and Industrial Design. Amend Section 17.122.030 as follows: • Eliminate the design guideline regarding screening of parking areas. This is a development requirement elsewhere in the Code. • Eliminate the landscaping standards for size of trees. These development requirements • are located elsewhere in the Code. In addition, any spelling, grammatical, and formatting errors that have been discovered since the publishing of the Development Code will be corrected. Item F-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2014-00205-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 28, 2014 Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects.of the project. This Development Code Amendment affects the City as a whole and does not impact any single development. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration. NOTICE: Pursuant to Government Code Section 65090, this item was advertised 32 days in advance as a public hearing (1/8 page ad) in the Inland Valley- Daily Bulletin newspaper. Because there was no quorum for the Regular Planning Commission meeting on May 14, 2014, no action could be taken. Therefore, the project was re-advertised with a large 10-day legal notice for this meeting date of May 28, 2014. No individual notice to property owners was provided. Respectfully submitted, Candyce B ett Planning Manager CB:JN/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Initial Study.Part II Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Approval of DRC2.014-00205 Item F-4 • City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 2. Related Files: N/A 3. Description of Project: A supplement to Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) amending Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to clarify definitions, administrative procedures, and correct prior errors and omissions. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 S. General Plan Designations: Residential • Very Low(<2 dwelling units [dus]/acre[acl) Low(2 to 4 dus/ac) Low Medium (4 to 8 dus/ac) Medium (8 to 14 dus/ac) Medium High (14 to 24 dus/ac) High (24 to 30 dus/ac) Commercial Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial General Commercial Commercial Recreation Mixed Use Mixed Use Industrial Industrial Park General Industrial Heavy Industrial 6. Zoning: Residential Estate Residential(1 du/ac) Very Low(<2 dus/ac) • Low(2 to 4 dus/ac) Low Medium (4 to 8 dus/ac) Medium (8 to 14 dus/ac) .Medium High (1.4 to 24 dus/ac) EXHIBIT A Item F-5 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 2 Commercial/Office Office/Professional Office Office Park Commercial/Office Community Facilities Village Commercial Community Service Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial General Commercial Specialty Commercial Freeway Related Commercial Recreational Commercial Regional Related Office/Commercial Regional Related Commercial Regional Center Mixed Use Financial Hospital Mixed Use/Retail Mixed Use/Office Industrial Industrial Park Light Industrial General Industrial Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Regional Description Rancho Cucamonga is located in the Inland Empire of California—in San Bernardino County. It is located.37 miles east of downtown Los Angeles. Direct freeway access to the City may be taken from the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and the Ontario Freeway (1-15). The County of San Bernardino (unincorporated area) and the City of Fontana are located to the east of Rancho Cucamonga. The City of Upland is located to the west of Rancho Cucamonga. The City of Ontario is adjacent to the south and southwest portions of Rancho Cucamonga. The County of San Bernardino(unincorporated areas)is located to the north of the City. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encompasses a total planning area of approximately 50 square miles. Thirty-eight square miles constitute the incorporated area, augmented by a 12 square mile Sphere-of-Influence that generally extends from the City's northern border up to the San Bernardino National Forest. The predominant City pattern for commercial activity is characterized by the commercial corridor along Foothill Boulevard, accented by the planned clusters of commercial and service businesses at many of the intersections. The northerly two-thirds of the City are predominately residential, while the southerly one-third is largely industrial. Commercial centers are located mostly along the main east to west spine of the City, Foothill Boulevard.. The northerly edge of. our Sphere-of-Influence is dominated primarily by open spaces of various types—a transition from the Rev 2-26-13 Item F-6 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 3 ® San Bernardino National Forest and Mountains that frame this part of the West Valley area of the San Bernardino County. Area Description Not applicable. The proposed project is the adoption of an Ordinance to amend Articles 11, III, IV, V and VII of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to revise text, development standards, land use descriptions/definitions, and figures/tables that will apply Citywide. Site Description Not applicable. The proposed project is the adoption of an Ordinance to amend Articles II, III, IV, V and VII of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to revise text, development standards, land use descriptions/definitions, and figures/tables that will apply Citywide. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Jennifer Nakamura ® Associate Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval' is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR—Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR-Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG—Reactive Organic Gases PM10—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan CALEEMOD—California Emissions Estimator Model Rev 2-26-13 Item F-7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( )Aesthetics ()Agricultural Resources ()Air Quality ( )Biological Resources ()Cultural Resources ()Geology&Soils ( )Greenhouse Gas Emissions ()Hazards&Waste Materials () Hydrology&Water Quality ( )Land Use&Planning ()Mineral Resources ()Noise ( )Population &Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation ( )Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities&Service Systems ( )Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of thi initial evaluation: (✓) I find t a th proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEG I EC 10 will prepared. Prepared By r Date: Reviewed By: , W1 174 Date: 'Vill Rev 2-26-13 Item F-8 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pith Than Significant Mitigation Significant ay wSignificantNo Impact Incorporated t Im act act EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project.• a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) () ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) () ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. The project will not amend any regulations affecting scenic vistas within the City. Therefore,the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. ® b) There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. C) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a speck site where there could be an impact on the visual character or quality of the City. All projects subject to these amendments will still require review by staff, the Design Review Committee, the Planning Commission, and/or the City Council to ensure compliance with design and technical requirements outlined in the Development Code and any other applicable Resolutions and Ordinances that have been adopted by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. d) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code. All projects subject to these amendments will be reviewed on an individual basis to verify compliance with light and glare requirements. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) () (✓) Williamson Act contract? Rev 2-26-13 Item F-9 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 6 Less Than Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mwg�ation Significant No ln=d Incorporated impact tryipact C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site and will not directly or indirectly affect any Unique Farmlands or Farmland of Statewide Importance. There . are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to'30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Nevertheless, the project does not include development of a specific site. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development. Code will not have an impact. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. d) Refer to 2.c above. e) Refer to 2.a and 2.c above. Rev 2-26-13 Item F-10 Initial Study for . City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallywThan Significaantnt Mogaadtt on Than No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project.• a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) () ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) () ( ) (✓) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: • a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments to the Development Code will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City. The preparation of air quality studies may be necessary to determine compliance with air quality standards and compliance with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. b) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments to the Development Code will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City. The preparation of air quality studies may be necessary to determine compliance with Federal and State standards that apply to various construction phases of development, on-site stationary .sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, energy use- related emissions, and fugitive dust generated during grading and construction activities. Fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-speck basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Air quality related emissions associated with the construction and operation of projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less- than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. • c) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Air quality related emissions associated with the construction and operation of projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for Rev 2-26-13 Item F-11 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Ppten4en ""aThan PP g . Signlflcant Mtigati on Significant No Impact In orated —impact -impact review by the City. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4.mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. Although there are sensitive receptors within the project area (the City), the project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site and thus will not increase existing air quality emissions that would expose sensitive receptors to additional pollutant concentrations. Air quality related emissions associated with the construction and operation of projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. e) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a speck site. Projects related to these amendments to the Development Code are not expected to produce objectionable orders that would affect a substantial number of people. Construction Odors (short-term) associated with the projects may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Common odors associated with commercial land uses would be expected (i.e. restaurants). Local odors from the majority of land uses would be similar to other urban areas and would not be considered significant. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and therefore are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Odors associated with construction and operations of projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Willdlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) V) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Willdlife Service? Rev 2-26-13 Item F-12 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or willdlife species or with established native resident or migratory willdlife corridors, or impede the use of native willdlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: • a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. The project does not propose any changes to the Development Code that would directly impact natural habitats within the City's borders. Projects that result from these amendments to the Development Code will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether they are in an area with potential biological resources and whether the preparation of biological studies are necessary. The study will be reviewed to determine the impacts to biological resources because of construction and operations, and to develop suitable mitigation measures. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. b) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of.a specific site. The project does not propose any changes to the Development Code that would directly impact natural habitats within the City's borders. Projects that result from these amendments to the Development Code will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether they are in an area with potential biological resources and whether the preparation of biological studies are necessary. The study will be reviewed to determine the impacts to biological resources because of construction and operations, and to develop suitable mitigation measures. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. C) No wetland habitat is present within the project area (the City). Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Although wildlife potentially may move through the north/south ® trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere-of-Influence, as the proposed amendments to the Development Code apply Citywide and are not site specific, the proposed amendments will not have an impact. Rev 2-26-13 Item F-13 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 10 Was Than Signtocent Less han Issues and Supporting Information Sources: S,�0� With Slgnifl nt No impact incorporated Myscl Impact e) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated for any potential effects on heritage trees on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City for review. A Tree Removal Permit shall be required prior to removal of any heritage trees and appropriate mitigation shall be required. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated for any potential effects on local conservation areas as described in the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. If there is an impact on habitat conservation plans, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to-the Development Code will not have an impact. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether they will have an impact on historical resources. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. b) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether they will have an impact on archeological resources. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. C) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that Rev 2-26-13 Item F-14 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 11 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact lincorporated ftact Impact result from these amendments will be evaluated for any potential effects on paleontological resources on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City for review. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. d) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether they will have an impact on human remains. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than- significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) () (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) () () (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) () () (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) () (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) () () (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) () ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a speck site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for Rev 2-26-13 Item F-15 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting SiSignHlInformation Sources: gna Potentially Nth Than eem Mitigation Significant No Impact In orated Imp act Impact review by the City for compliance with earthquake safety and soil stability requirements. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. b) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a speck site. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether they will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils whether there will be impacts to soils including substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. C) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a speck site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine impacts on-site and off-site soil stability. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore,the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. d) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine if the project is on expansive soil that could create substantial risks to life or property. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact.Therefore,the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. e) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to evaluate wastewater disposal. Sewer/septic options will be evaluated within the context of local, State, and federal regulations and guidelines. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) ( ) ( ) V) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. The General Plan Rev 2-26-13 Item F-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 13 Less Then Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant MAigation Significant No Impact IncnMorated Impact Impact FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel-powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cha, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City. The preparation of GHG studies may be necessary to evaluate GHG related emissions. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. b) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. No applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control • Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed amendments to the Development Code will not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AS). Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City. The preparation of GHG studies may be necessary to evaluate GHG related emissions. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) () (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ® acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? Rev 2-26-13 Item F-17 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 14 Less Than Significant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact ln=poratW Irnpact kmact d) Be located on a site which is included on a list.of () ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) () ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving willdland fires, including where willdlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with willdlands? Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations conceming the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine if there will be routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. b)- The-project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact Therefore,the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. Rev 2-26-13 Item F-18 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment 6RC2014-00205 Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mtigation Significant No Impact Inco rated Impact Im act C) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a speck site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether there will be hazardous emissions, or handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. d) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether they are located on a site that contains hazardous materials. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. e) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. The City is partly located within an Airport Land Use Plan for Ontario International Airport according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. The City's southern boundary is about one mile north of the northern runway of Ontario International Airport. The proposed amendments to the Development Code apply Citywide and do not involve a site-specific project or construction project. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether they are located within the Airspace Protection Area according to . the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and, if they are, will be required to comply with Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. g) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to ensure that they have at least two points of public street access and comply with all applicable City Codes,--including local Fire Ordinances. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. h) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will ® apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for Rev 2-26-13 Item F-19 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 16 y Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s�� l�v�on Siccant No Impact In led Impact Impact review by the City to determine whether they are located on a site within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1 and, if they are, will be required to comply with the adopted policies and Standard Conditions that limit uses to Very Low density residential development and Hillside residential uses to limit property exposed to wildland fire hazards. Projects will be required to submit a Fire Protection Plan, with wildland fire mitigation measures, to outline appropriate measures to address fire hazards and ensure that impacts are less-than-significant. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the. alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) () (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (✓) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) () (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami,or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Rev 2-26-13 Item F-20 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significantnt PaWith Than gnifiMtigation Significant Im ad Inco orated Impact Im oa act Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a speck site. Projects that result from these amendments will be required to connect to existing water and sewer systems. These projects will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine the need for a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. b) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. According to the CVWD (Cucamonga Valley Water District), approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. The CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development Citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. The CVWD has plans to meet • this increased need to the year 2030. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for.review by the City to determine impacts to groundwater supplies and/or recharge basis or spreading grounds according to General Plan Figure RC-3. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. C) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case=by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine impacts to absorption rates, drainage patterns, the rate and amount of surface water runoff, erosion, siltation,and alteration of any stream or river. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. d) Refer to 9.c above. e) Refer to 9.c above. f) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine impacts to surface water quality caused by grading activities associated with the construction period that could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant ® impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. Rev 2-26-13 Item F-21 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 18 t.esa mai+ aWHcarn Less � g Than and Supporting Information Sources: � � Wdon Significant No trnpact Incomorated Impact Impact g) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the.City to determine if the project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. If it is, the project will be required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation that requires the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. h) Refer to 9.g above. i) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. ' The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine if the project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. If it is, the project will be required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation that requires the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. j) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. No impacts from seiche and tsunami are.anticipated as there are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project area (the City). The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the,steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine if the project site is located in the vicinity of these areas. If they are, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. Rev 2-26-13 Item F-22 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 19 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact I'nomrporated Impact Impact 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project. . a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, speck plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City will be required to be designed in a manner that will ensure it becomes a part of the larger community. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. • b) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City will be required to be designed in a manner that is consistent with the General Plan and do not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. C) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine if they area in a habitat conservation or natural community plan areas and whether the preparation of biological studies is necessary. The studies will be reviewed to determine the impacts to these habitat conservation or natural community plan areas and to develop suitable mitigation measures. The review of these studies will be coordinated with environmental agencies such as the California Department of Fish and Wildlife(CDFW)and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS). Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local • general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Rev 2-26-13 Item F-23 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 20 Less Than SIgrAcant Less en Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Si�'� r�n�non Significant No Impact In orated Impact I as Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for . review by the City to determine if the site is within an area designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1. If necessary, consideration will be given to minimize potential conflict of uses. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. b) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine if the site is within an area designated as a valuable mineral resource recovery site according to the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1. If necessary, consideration will be given to minimize potential conflict of uses. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () ( ) ( ) V) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () ( ) () V) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () ( ) ( ) V) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () () ( ) V) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine if they are in areas with noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out and/or is adjacent to any Rev 2-26-13 Item F-24 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact developed/occupied noise sensitive land use, and whether the preparation of noise study is necessary. The study will be reviewed to determine the noise impacts because of construction, operations, and traffic, and to develop suitable mitigation measures. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. b) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether they cause the generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise due to construction-related vibration and whether the preparation of noise study is necessary. The study will be reviewed to determine the noise impacts because of construction, operations, and traffic, and to develop suitable mitigation measures. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. C) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine noise impacts because of traffic and whether the preparation of noise study is necessary. The study will be reviewed to determine the • noise impacts because traffic, and to develop suitable mitigation measures. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. C) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether they cause the generation of excessive noise due to construction-related vibration and whether the preparation of noise study is necessary. The study will be reviewed to determine the noise impacts because of construction, operations, and traffic, and to develop suitable mitigation measures. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. f) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. The proposed amendments to the Development Code affect an area that is partially within an Airport Land Use Plan and is partially within 2 miles of a public airport. Although off-set north of the flight path, site-specific projects could be located at varying distances north of the Ontario International Airport. Site-specific projects could be within the CNEL noise contour of the Ontario International Airport. All applicants will be required to prepare and submit a noise study to determine the noise impacts because of the airport and to develop suitable mitigation measures. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. g) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west • of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. Rev 2-26-13 Item F-25 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant nnisgafion Significant No Impact Inco I act Im d. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a). Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () ( ) () (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) () (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) () (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a speck site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether they are consistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation and whether they will substantially affect population growth in the City. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. b) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a speck site. It is not expected that the proposed amendments to the Development Code will directly or indirectly cause the substantial displacement of existing housing.Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. C) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. It is not expected that the proposed amendments to the Development Code will directly or indirectly cause the displacement of a substantial number people. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services. a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) () (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) C) Schools? ( ) ( ) () (✓) d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) () (✓) Rev 2-26-13 Item F-26 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 23 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: FotenGant With Than Significant Mligation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. It is not expected that the proposed amendments to the Development Code will directly or indirectly require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on any projects that result from these Amendments to the Development Code to lessen the future demand and impacts to Fire services. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. b) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine if there is an increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection is not required as additional projects will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. • c) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City and, as a standard condition of approval, may be required to pay School Impact Fees. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. d) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City and, as a standard condition of approval, may be required to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. e) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City. It is expected that they will utilize existing public facilities and will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities, and will otherwise be consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. • Rev 2-26-13 Item F-27 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 24 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Si���;; M�"' Than gafion Significant No Impact In _"pad I act 15. RECREATION. Would the project. a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) () ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) () () (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use'of parks or other recreational facilities. Standard conditions of approval will be placed on any future residential projects that result. from these amendments to the Development Code that will require a developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore,the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. b) Refer to 15.a above. 16. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project. a) Conflict with-an applicable plan, ordinance or policy () () ( ) (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) () ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and, travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () ( ) ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Rev 2-26-13 Item F-28 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 25 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Iff1pact D Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () ( ) () (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a speck site. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections and whether the preparation of traffic study is necessary. The study will be reviewed to determine the traffic impacts and to develop suitable mitigation measures. Projects that result from these amendments will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards if they are missing. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of Building Permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. • b) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a speck site. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these Development Impact Fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections and whether the preparation of traffic study is necessary. The study will be reviewed to determine the traffic impacts and to develop suitable mitigation measures. Projects that result from these amendments will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards if they are missing. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of Building Permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. C) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. The City is partially located within an Airport Land Use Plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is partially within 2 miles of a public airport. The City is off-set north of the flight path. Projects that result from these amendments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to • determine compliance with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. Rev 2-26-13 Item F-29 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2O14-00205 Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: scam Mitigation SIgnfioant No Impact In Im et —impact d) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be required to include street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards if they are missing and to be designed in a manner that does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. . e) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be required to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project to ensure inadequate emergency access. Therefore,the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. f) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be required to provide features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) V) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) V) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, 'the construction of which. could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) v) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () ( ) ( ) V) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () ( ) ( ) V) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a speck site. The City is served by Rev 2-26-13 Item F-30 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 27 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact I Impact the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for build-out of the General Plan. Projects that result from these amendments will be required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. b) Refer to 1 Ta above. C) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be required to have a Grading and Drainage Plan that must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. d) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a speck site. The City is served by ® the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve any projects that result from the proposed amendments to the Development Code. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. e) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. The City is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. f) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. g) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments will be required to comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. Rev 2-26-13 Item F-31 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Potentially wlt, ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant IYUtlgation Significant No Impact lincorpersted I Impact ftact 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or willdlife species, cause a fish or willdlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) () (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) () () (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, parts of the City are within an area of sensitive biological resources. Projects that result from these amendments to the Development Code will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether they are in an area with potential biological resources and whether the preparation of biological studies are necessary. The study will be reviewed to determine the impacts to biological resources because of construction and operations, and to develop suitable mitigation measures. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. b) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a specific site. Projects that result from these amendments to the Development Code will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine impacts related to the construction and operation following the submittal of environmental analyses such as air quality, biological, noise, and traffic studies. If a site-specific project is approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the.City and . Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and.Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These Rev 2-26-13 Item F-32 i I i Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 29 • benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) The project is an ordinance to adopt a set of amendments to the Development Code that will apply Citywide and does not include development of a speck site. Projects that result from these amendments to the Development Code will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when they are submitted for review by the City to determine whether they may have a direct or indirect substantial adverse effect on human beings. Impacts related to the construction and operation of new facilities will be determined following the submittal of environmental analyses such as air quality, biological, noise, and traffic studies. Mitigation measures, if necessary, will be required to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels. Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Development Code will not have an impact. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive(check all that apply): • (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) Rev 2-26-13 Item F-33 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga . Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Page 30 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereb ree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point wher e y no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature tte: 7J 1 Print Name and Title: D� Rev 2-26-13 Item F-34 RANCHO CUCAMONGA VicinityMap Z>A C, »/fir/ D o.�v� C/ rypl4e e I m E t € ' a U = Q = 2 ® I 4 � � v � c � d A I I I M 19St e Base Line Base Line I Church Church Foothill a Foothill N Arrow B �' 1° t Arrow • J mey c r e 8th ! d 1 W j C7 6th a c 6th w t €iN 4th g 4th 7k Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chambers 0 10500 Civic Center Drive Item F-35 • RESOLUTION NO. 14-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00205, A SUPPLEMENTAL UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 for a supplemental update to the City's Development Code found in Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 2. On May 28, 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the • Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 28, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The City Council adopted a comprehensive update to the City's Development Code that implements the policies of the General Plan, in July 2012. The new Development Code became effective on September 4, 2012. b. Based on feedback received since the effective date of the Development Code, the City prepared a set of amendments (the "Amendments"), which is included as Attachment A to this Resolution and is hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. C. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 conforms to and does not conflict with the General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan. d. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the • Negative Declaration. 1 Item F-36 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-15 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00205-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 28, 2014 Page 2 e. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. Based on these .findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of May 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 2 Item F-37 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article 1,Chapter 17.04 Chapter 17.04 Administrative Responsibility Sections: Section 17.04.010 Purpose..........................................................................................17.04-1 Section 17.04.020 Planning Agency............................................................................17.04-1 Section 17.04.010 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to establish and describe the respective administrative responsibilities of City officials and bodies (e.g., Planning Director, Planning Commission, City Council)for purposes of this Title. Section 17.04.020 Planning Agency California Government Code §65100 requires each jurisdiction to establish a planning agency to carry out the land use and planning functions of the jurisdiction. The functions of the planning agency, as designated by the Title, shall be carried out by the following bodies. In the absence of an assignment, the City Council shall retain responsibility and authority as the legislative body of the City. A. Planning Director. The Planning Director, or designee, shall have the responsibility and authority to administer and enforce this Title as follows: ® 1. Application Process. Receive and review all applications for development pursuant to this Title. Processing includes but is not limited to the certification of completed applications, the establishment of a permanent file, posting of public notices, collection of applicable fees, preparation of reports, processing of appeals, and presentation of staff reports to the Development Review Committees, Planning Commission, Historic Preservation Commission, and City Council. 2. Interpretation. Interpret the provisions and advise the public on the requirements of this Title. 3. Amendment. Initiate action for amendment of this Title where it is determined that such amendment would better implement the General Plan goals and objectives and increase its effectiveness and/or improve or clarify the contents of this Title. 4. Permit Issuance. Issue permits under this Title and certify that all such permits are in full conformance with its requirements. 5. Coordination. Refer and coordinate matters related to the administration of this Title with other agencies and City departments and provide information on the status of all development permits. 6. Authority. Serve as the administrative zoning body and exercise that authority set forth in Government Code §65900 et seq. Attachment A 17.04.1 Item F-38 Article I,Chapter 1.7.04 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code G B. Design Review Committee. The Design Review. Committee is responsible for reviewing the architecture (including material, finish, colors, and trim), site layout, building plotting, landscaping, compatibility with surrounding properties, and, when appropriate, signs, of new development. The committee's emphasis is on quality design in the community as described in the City's General Plan and this Title. The Design Review Committee consists of two Planning Commissioners and the Planning Director(or his or her designee). Q.C. Technical Review Committee. The Technical Review Committee ensures a project conforms to adopted building and engineering standards. The Technical Review Committee consists of representatives from Planning, Engineering, Public Works and Building and Safety departments, as well as the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Representatives from outside agencies,such as the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), also provide comments.The focus of their review includes, but is not limited to,public improvements(such as streets,curbs,gutters),access to and from the public right-of-way and the project site, utilities, emergency access and circulation, fire hydrant locations, and landscaping in the public right-of-way. €D. Trails Advisory Committee. The Trails Advisory Committee is composed of two members of the Planning Commission and one member of the Planning Department, as well as equestrians and bicyclists. The Committee meets monthly to discuss and provide recommendations to the City Council on the development of the Citys trail system. :E. City Manager.The City Manager or designee shall oversee the work of the Planning Director and shall exercise such other powers and duties as are prescribed by state law or local ordinance, or as directed by the City Council. F. Planning Commission. Pursuant to California Government Code §65101, and as provided in Chapter 2.20,the City of Rancho Cucamonga has an established Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall have the following land use responsibilities: 1. Hear and decide applications for entitlements as provided in Article 11 (Land Use and Development Procedures). 2. Initiate studies of amendments to this Title and make recommendations to the City Council for amendments as provided in Article II (Land Use and Development Procedures)and in Government Code§65853. 3. Hear and make recommendations to the City Council on applications for zoning amendments, the General Plan and amendments thereto, Specific Plans, prezoning, and other related planning studies. 17.04-2 Item F-39 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article II, Chapter 17.16 Chapter 17.16 Planning Director Decisions Sections: Section 17.16.010 Purpose and Applicability................................................................. 17.16-1 Section 17.16.020 Official Code Interpretations............................................................. 17.16-1 Section 17.16.025 Director Determination Process(with Notice)................................... 17.16-2 Section 17.16.030 Plan Check/Zoning Clearance.......................................................... 17.16-2 Section 17.16.040 Home Occupation Permit................................................................. 17.16-3 Section 17.16.050 Sign Permit...................................................................................... 17.16-4 Section 17.16.060 Uniform Sign Program...................................................................... 17.16-4 Section 17.16.070 Temporary Use Permit..................................................................... 17.16-5 Section 17.16.080 Tree Removal Permit....................................................................... 17.16-6 Section 17.16.090 Similar Use Determination...............................................................17.16-10 Section 17.16.100 Site Development Review...............................................................17.16-11 Section 17.16.110 Minor Exceptions.............................................................................17.16-13 Section 17.16.120 Conditional Use Permit....................................................................17.16-14 Section 17.16.130 Minor Design Review......................................................................17.16-15 Section 17.16.140 Hillside Development Review..........................................................17.16-18 Section 17.16.150 Reasonable Accommodation...........................................................17.16-23 I Section 17.16.160 Large Family Day Care Permit.................... 17.16-26 Section 17.16.010 Purpose and Applicability The purpose of this Section is to establish procedures for planning and zoning related permits • that are decided administratively by City staff or the Planning Director. Each permit and entitlement type is described in this Article in terms of purpose and applicability, approving authority, and unique processing provisions. Exemptions to permit requirements are listed throughout. General processing procedures are established in Chapter 17.14 (General Application Processing Procedures). Table 17.14.060-1 (Approving Authority for Land Use Entitlements) provides a summary of the administrative and Planning Director permits and entitlements and indicates whether the decision may be appealed. Section 17.16.020 Official Code Interpretations A. Purpose and Applicability. The Planning Director may issue official code interpretation pursuant to this Section when, in his or her opinion, the meaning or applicability of any provision of this Code is ambiguous, misleading, or unclear. The purpose of such interpretations is to disclose the manner in which this Title shall be applied in future cases, provided that any interpretation may be superseded by a later interpretation when the Planning Director determines that the earlier interpretation was in error or no longer applicable under the current circumstances.The Planning Director may issue an official interpretation or refer the question to the Planning Commission for a determination. B. Review Process. 1. Official code interpretations shall be issued in writing and shall'state the facts upon which the Planning Director relied to make the determination. • 17.16-1 Item F-40 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article II, Chapter 17.16 D. Findings.The Planning Director shall make a Similar Use Determination after finding all of the following. If the Planning Director does not make all of these findings, he/she shall not make the Similar Use Determination: 1. The characteristics of and activities associated with the proposed use are equivalent to one or more of the listed uses and will not involve a higher level of activity, environmental impact, or population density than the uses listed in the zoning district. 2. The proposed use will be consistent with the purposes of the applicable zoning district. 3. The proposed use will be consistent with the General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan, and the Development Code. E. Determinations. Determinations shall be made in writing and shall contain the facts that support the determination.The Department shall maintain all such determinations on record for review by the general public upon request. The notice of decision shall be provided, in writing,to the applicant and interested parties.The notice shall include: 1. A brief statement explaining the criteria and standards considered relevant to the decision. 2. A statement of the standards and facts relied upon in rendering the decision. 3. An explanation of appeal rights and appeal deadlines. Section 17.16.100 Site Development Review A Purpose.The purpose of Site Development Review is to provide for the administrative review of projects which,because of their limited size and scope,have minor aesthetic, land use, or traffic implications and do not create any significant impact on public utilities or services and to ensure that such limited projects comply with all applicable City standards and ordinances,and are not detrimental to the public health, safety,or welfare,or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the immediate vicinity. B. Applicability. All applications for Site Development Review are required for residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional projects, which may or may not involve the issuance of a Building Permit for construction or reconstruction of a structure, which meets the following criteria: 1. Residential Projects. The following residential projects require Site Development Review: L Modification to approved architectural designs and building configurations for multifamily development,which do not create greater bulk, scale, or change in the line of sight; Residential additions equal to or greater than fifty percent(50%of the existing square footage.. 17.16-11 Item F-41 Article II, Chapter 17.16 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Iii-.iii. Architectural changes which de-flet-change the basic form and theme; 4 iv. Exterior material or color changes which conflict with the original form and theme and which are not consistent and compatible with the original materials and colors; +v-.v. New construction, expansion, reconfiguration or significant reconstruction of driveways. *.vi. Installation of a satellite dish or antenna greater than twenty(20)square feet in surface area. 2. Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional Projects. The following commercial, industrial, and institutional projects require Site Development Review: i. Changes to gross floor area of existing buildings or approved design plans which do not result in more than a 10 percent change; ii. New construction, expansion, reconfiguration or significant reconstruction of parking lots or driveways. W. Modification to approved architectural designs and building configurations,which do not create greater bulk,scale,or change in the line of sight. • iv. Modifications to approved plans, which do not change the general location and layout of the site. V. The establishment and/or construction of an outdoor storage area on the same site as, and in conjunction with, an existing business that is less than ten percent(10%)the gross floor area of the primary use. vi.. The construction and/or placement of silos, antennas not regulated by Chapter 17.106, water tanks, roof- or ground-mounted equipment visible from public view, or similar structures and equipment. vii. Grading alterations to approved plans that do not change the basic concept,increase slopes or building elevations or change the course of drainage. viii. Modification to existing landscaping or landscape plans in excess of five thousand(5,000)square feet. ix. Architectural changes which do not change the basic form and theme. X Exterior material or color changes which do not conflict with the original form and theme and which are consistent and compatible with the original materials and colors. A. Modifications to existing site features (e.g., trellis, pergola, water features). 17.16-12 Item F-42 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article II, Chapter 17.16 approval as pursuant to Subsection 17.14.060.0 (Referral to the Planning Commission). D. Findings.The Director shall approve, or approve with conditions, an application for a Conditional Use Permit after finding all of the following. If the Director does not make all of these findings, he/she shall deny the Conditional Use Permit: 1. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. 2. The site is physically suited for the type, density,and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. 3. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience,or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. E. Conditions. In approving a Conditional Use Permit, the Director may impose any reasonable conditions to ensure that the approval will comply with the findings required, as well as any performance criteria and development standards contained within this Code. Section 17.16.130 Minor Design Review A. Purpose. This Section establishes a Minor Design Review process for certain types of residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional development proposals to facilitate project review in a timely and efficient manner, to ensure that development projects comply with all applicable local design guidelines,standards,and ordinances; to minimize adverse effects on surrounding properties and the environment;and to be consistent-with the General Plan which promotes high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the physical, economic, and social character of Rancho Cucamonga. B. Applicability. Minor Design Review is required for commercial,industrial,institutional, and residential projects that meet any of the following qualifications: 1 Commercial Industrial and Institutional Projects. The following commercials industrial and institutional Proiects require Minor Design Review: 4.4. New construction on vacant property,where the buildings are less than ten thousand(10,000)square feet in area. iii. Structural additions or new buildings which are less than fifty percent (50%) of the floor area of eAsting on-site building(s), or are less than ten thousand(10,000)square feet. 17.16.15 Item F-43 Article II, Chapter 17.16 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code iii. Reconstructionj roects which are less ess than fifty percent (50%) of the floor area of existing on-site building(s), or are less than ten thousand (10,000)square feet. 3-iv. Projects involving a substantial chance or intensification of land use such as the conversion of an existing building to a restaurant 4. Residential additions equal te OF gFeatOF than fi#y pemw# 0 )of the existii;q sgea�e-#seta 2. Residential Projects. The following residential oroiects require Minor Design Review: L Residential construction involving four(4)or less dwelling units. 5-ii. Proiects involving a substantial change or intensification of land use such as the conversion of a residential structure to an office or commercial use. C. Review Process. 1. An application for a Minor Design Review shall be filed with the Planning Department in a manner prescribed by the Planning Director with the required fee as established by City Council resolution. 2. The Planning Director shall be the approving authority for Minor Design Reviews. The procedure for review and action shall be as provided in this Section. 3. All development proposals submitted pursuant to this Section may be reviewed by the following committees: (1)Design Review Committee—architecture and site planning; and (23) Technical Review Committee-compliance with technical code requirements. If reviewed by any or all of the aforementioned committees, each committee shall make a recommendation on each project for consideration. 4. Upon acceptance of a complete application, projects subject to section 17.16.130 F 3 shall be scheduled on the first available agenda for committee reviews. The applicant and any persons requesting notice will be notified at least ten(10) days prior to the meetings. 5. The Design Review Committee shall review the project design submittals and make recommendations to the Planning Director based on: L Design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan,design guidelines of the appropriate district, and any adopted architectural criteria for 17.16-16 Item F-44 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article II, Chapter 17.16 specialized area, such as designated historic districts, theme areas, specific plans, community plan, boulevards, or planned developments. ii. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing,or future developments,and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. iii. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this Section and the General Plan of the City. iv. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and the visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. . i .6. Technical Review Committee. Review by this committee will consider items such as, but not limited to, circulation, street improvements, right-of-way dedication, utility easements, grading, drainage facilities, storm drain improvements, California Building Code requirements, security, fire flow, emergency access, location of fire hydrants,water and sewer line connections and sizing,water pressure,permit fees, streetscape and landscape standards, setbacks, parking, and requirements for environmental processing. The committee will require changes in any development for compliance with adopted codes and standards. The committee may also make recommendations to the Planning Director. D. Findings.The Planning Director, where authorized, shall make the following findings before approving a Minor Design Review application: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.. 2. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 3. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions-of the Development Code. 17.16-17 Item F-45 Article II, Chapter 17.16 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 4. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. E. Conditions. In approving a,Minor Design Review, the Director may impose any reasonable conditions to ensure that the approval will comply with the findings required, as well as any performance criteria and development standards contained within this Code. Section 17.16.140 Hillside Development Review A. Purpose.The Hillside Development Review process provides a mechanism to review development proposals in sensitive hillside areas,the intent is to minimize the adverse effects of grading, and to provide for the safety and benefit the welfare of the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga while allowing for reasonable development of land. B. Applicability. All projects within the Hillside Overlay District and any properties with an eight percent(8%)slope or greater, including but not limited to: 1. Construction of one or more single-family homes. 2. Proposed lot development in conjunction with a Tentative Subdivision Map. 3. Proposed lot development in conjunction with a General Plan or Development • Code Amendment. 4. Design Review Committee review avis required and arms advisory to the Planning Director. C. Exceptions. Projects, which are limited in scope, (e.g., regrading of yard areas, pool/spa construction, additions to existing structures, and/or construction of accessory structures which are less than nine hundred sixty[960] square feet) may apply for a Minor Design Review. However, projects which require grading of large flat areas, including, but not limited to, such items as tennis courts or riding rings, shall require a Hillside Design Review application. D. Application. An application for a Hillside Design Review shall be made on a form specified by the Planning Director and shall include, at minimum: 1. A natural features map,which shall identify all existing slope banks, ridgelines, canyons, natural drainage courses, federally recognized blue line streams, rock outcroppings, and existing vegetation. Also depicted shall be landslides and other existing geologic hazards. 2. A conceptual grading plan, which shall include the following items in addition to those required by the City's Submittal Requirement Checklist: L A legend with appropriate symbols which-should include,'but not be ` limited to, the following items: top of wall, top of curb, high point, low point, elevation of significant trees, spot elevations, pad and finished • floor elevations, and change in direction of drainage. 17.16-18 Item F-46 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article II, Chapter 17.16 ii. A separate map with proposed fill areas colored in green and cut areas colored in red, with areas where cut and fill exceed depths established in the hillside development guidelines and standards clearly shown. Additionally, the areas of out and fill, calculated as a percentage of the total site area, shall be included on the plan. iii. Contours shall be shown for existing and natural land conditions and proposed work. Existing contours shall be depicted with a dashed line with every fifth contour darker,and proposed contours shall be depicted as above except with a solid line. Contours shall be shown according to the following schedule: a. Natural slope of nineteen point nine percent (19.9%) or less requires two-foot(2')contours; b. Natural slope of twenty percent(20%)or greater requires five- foot(5')contours. 3. A conceptual drainage and flood control facilities map describing planned drainage improvements. 4. A slope analysis map for the purpose of determining the amount and location of land, as it exists in its natural state falling into each slope category as specked below. For the slope map, the applicant shall use a base topographical map of the subject site, prepared and signed by a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor, which shall have a scale of not less than one inch(1")to one hundred feet(100')and a contour interval of not.more than two feet (2') provided that the contour interval may be five feet (5') when the slope is more than twenty percent (20%). This base topographical map shall include all adjoining properties within one hundred fifty feet (150') of the site boundaries. Delineate slope bands in the range of zero (0) up to five percent (5%),five percent(5%)up to ten percent(10%),ten percent(10%)up to fifteen percent (15%), frfteen percent (15%) up to twenty percent (20%), twenty percent (20%) up to twenty-five percent (25%), twenty-five percent (25%) up to thirty percent(30%),and thirty percent(30%)or greater.Also included shall be a tabulation of'the land area in each slope category specified in acres. 5. The exact method for computing the percent slope and area of each slope category should be sufficiently described and presented so that a review can be readily made. Also, a heavy, solid line indicating the eight percent (8%) grade differential shall be clearly marked on the plan, and an additional copy of the map shall be submitted with the slope percentage categories depicted in contrasting colors. 6. Provide a sufficient number of slope profiles to clearly illustrate the extent of the proposed grading. A minimum of three(3) slope profiles shall be included with the slope analysis.The slope profiles shall: i. Be drawn at the same scale and indexed, or keyed, to the slope analysis map,grading plan, and project site map. 17.16-19 Item F-47 Article 11, Chapter 17.16 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code ii. Show existing and proposed topography, structures, and infrastructures. Proposed topography, structures, and infrastructures shall be drawn with a solid, heavy line. Existing topography and features shall be drawn with a thin or dashed line. iii. The slope profile shall extend far enough from the project site boundary to clearly show impact on adjacent property, at least one hundred fifty feet(150'). iv. The profiles shall be drawn along those locations of the project site where: a. The greatest alteration of existing topography is proposed; b. The most intense or bulky development is proposed; C. The site is most visible from surrounding land uses; and d. At all site boundaries illustrating maximum and minimum conditions. At least two (2) of the slope profiles shall be roughly parallel to each other and roughly perpendicular to existing contour lines. At least one other slope profile shall be roughly at a forty-five (45) degree angle to the other slope profiles and existing contour lines. 7. Both the slope analysis and slope profiles shall be stamped and signed by either a registered landscape architect, civil engineer, or land surveyor indicating the datum, source, and scale of topographic data used in the slope analysis and slope profiles, and attesting to the fact that the slope analysis and slope profiles have been accurately calculated and identified consistent with provisions of this Chapter. 8. A geologic and soils report, prepared by an approved soils engineering firm and in sufficient detail to substantiate and support the design concepts presented in the application as submitted. Additional environmental studies and investigations, such as, but not limited to, hydrologic, seismic, access/circulation, and biota research may also be required in order to help in the determination of the buildable area of a site. 9. A statement of conditions for ultimate ownership and maintenance of all parts of the development including streets, structures,and open spaces. 10. In the event that no grading is proposed, e.g., custom lot subdivision, a statement to that effect shall be filed with a plan which shows possible future house plotting, lot grading, driveway design, and septic system location for each parcel proposed,to be prepared on a topographic map drawn at the same scale as the conceptual grading plan. i 17.16-20 Item F-48 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article II, Chapter 17.1.6 11. When unit development is proposed, illustrative building elevations that show all sides of the proposed structure(s)and which accurately depict the building envelope for each lot shall be provided. 12. The following items may be required if determined necessary by the GFadiRg I G i#ee,Planning Director, or Planning Commission to aid in the analysis of the proposed project to illustrate existing or proposed conditions or both: L A topographic model; ii. A line of sight or view analysis; iii. Photographic renderings; iv. Any other illustrative technique determined necessary to aid in review of a project 13. Exceptions to the filing requirements may be permitted by the Planning Director based on the size and scope of the project. E. Review Process. 1. The Planning Director shall be the approving authority for Hillside Development Reviews. The procedure for review and action shall be as provided in this Section. 2. Scheduling for Review. Upon acceptance of a complete application, a project shall be scheduled on the first available agenda for committee reviews. The applicant and any persons requesting notice will be.notified at least ten (10) days prior to the meetings. 3. All development proposals submitted pursuant to this Section may be reviewed by the Technical and-Design-and. GFad;F;g-Review committees: (1) Design Review Committee-architecture and site planning; ; nd(23)Technical Review Committee-compliance with technical code requirements. If reviewed by any or all of the aforementioned committees, each committee shall make a recommendation on each project for consideration. 4. The Design Review Committee shall review the project design submittals and make recommendations to the Planning Director based on: I. Design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan,design guidelines of the appropriate district, and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area, such as designated historic districts, theme areas, specific plans, community plan, boulevards, or planned developments. ii. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, 17.16-21 Item F-49 Article II, Chapter 17.16 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code existing,or future developments,and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. iii. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this Section and the General Plan of the City. iv. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and the visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. the Gitys Hillside Development RegulatieRs, GhapteF 17.52 (Hillside ia:5. Technical Review Committee. Review by this committee will consider items • such as, but not limited to, circulation, street improvements, right-of-way dedication, utility easements, grading, drainage facilities, storm drain improvements, California Building Code requirements, security, fire flow, emergency access, location of fire hydrants,water and sewer line connections and sizing,water pressure, permit fees, streetscape and landscape standards, setbacks, parking, and .requirements for environmental processing. The committee will require changes in any development for compliance with adopted codes and standards. The committee may also make recommendations to the Planning Director. F. Findings. The Planning Director, where authorized, shall make the following findings before approving a Hillside Development Review application: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 3. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. - G. Conditions. In approving a Hillside Development Review, the Director may impose any reasonable conditions to ensure that the approval will comply with the findings 17.16-22 Item F-50 Article II, Chapter 17.16 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 2. A certificate of occupancy has been issued; 3. The use is established; or 4. A time extension has been granted. L. Time Extension. The Planning Director may approve a single one (1) year time extension for a reasonable accommodation for good cause.An application for a time extension shall be made in writing to the Director no less than thirty(30)days or more than ninety(90) days prior to the expiration date. The request for an extension shall be subject to the same notice, hearing, and appeal requirements applicable to the original application. M. Violation of Terms. Any reasonable accommodation approved in accordance with the terms of this Code may be revoked if any of the conditions or terms of such reasonable accommodation are violated, or if any law or ordinance is violated in connection therewith. Revocation of a reasonable accommodation shall be subject to the same notice, hearing, and appeal requirements applicable to the original application. N. Discontinuance. A reasonable accommodation shall lapse if the exercise of rights granted by it is discontinued for one hundred eighty (180) consecutive days. If the persons initially occupying a residence vacate, the reasonable accommodation shall remain in effect only if the Planning Director determines that: (1) the modification is physically integrated into the residential structure and cannot easily be removed or altered to comply with the Zoning Code,or(2)the accommodation is necessary to give another disabled individual an equal opportunity to enjoy the dwelling. The Director may request the applicant or his or her successor in interest to the property to provide documentation that subsequent occupants are persons with disabilities. Failure to provide such documentation within ten (10) days of the date of a request by the City' shall constitute grounds for discontinuance by the City of a previously approved reasonable accommodation. O. Revocation. Any revocation shall be noticed and heard pursuant to the procedures established in this Title. P. Amendments. A request for changes in conditions of approval of a reasonable accommodation, or a change to plans that would affect a condition of approval shall be treated as a new application. The Director may waive the requirement for a new application if the changes are minor, do not involve substantial alterations or addition to the plan or the conditions of approval, and are consistent with the intent of the original approval. Section 1716 160 Large Family Day Care Permit A Purpose The requirement of a Large Familv Day Care Permit ensures that large family day cares in residential neighborhoods are compatible with the surrounding 17.16-26 Item F-51 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article II, Chapter 17.16 • neighborhood character. The Planning Director is authorized to approve, impose reasonable conditions upon such approval, or deny Large Family Day Care. B. Applicability. This Section applies to all Large Family Day Cares, as described in Section 17.32(Allowed Use Descriptions). C. Review Process.An application for a Large Family Day Care Permit shall be filed with the Planning Department in a manner prescribed by the Planning Director with the required fee as established by City Council resolution. The Planning Director is the approving authority for Large Family Day Care Permits. However, the Planning Director may also refer a Large Family Day Care Permit to the Planning Commission for review and approval as pursuant to Subsection 17.14.060.0 (Referral to the Planning Commission). Upon acceptance of a Large Family Day Care Permit application, the Plannina Director or a designated representative shall review the request for compliance with all State and Local standards. D. Public Notice. The Planning Director shall, not less than ten (10) days before rendering a decision, provide for public comment through notice to adjacent property owners of the pending application pursuant to Subsection 17.16.025 (Director Determination Process). E. Findinns. A Large Family Day Care Permit shall be granted only when the Planning Director determines that the proposed Large Family Day Care complies with all of the following findings: 1. The proposed home occupation is consistent with the General Plan, any applicable Speck Plan or Planned Community, and all applicable provisions of this Title: 2. The proposed Large Family Day Care is consistent with all applicable State and Local laws and ordinances: and 3. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the Large Family Day Care applied for will not, under the circumstances of the particular case (location size, design, and operating characteristics), be detrimental to the health safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such use or to the general welfare of the City. F. Conditions. In approving a Large Family Day Care Permit the Director may impose any reasonable conditions to ensure that the approval will comply with the findings required, as well as any performance criteria and development standards contained within this Code. 17.16-27 Item F-52 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article II, Chapter 17.20 Chapter 17.20 Planning Commission Decisions Sections: Section17.20.010 Purpose............................................................................................. 17.20-1 Section 17.20.020 Entertainment Permit..................................................:..................... 17.20-1 Section17.20.030 Variance........................................................................................... 17.20-3 Section 17.20.040 Design Review.................:............................................................... 17.20-4 Section 17.20.050 Adult Entertainment Permit............................................................... 17.20-8 Section 17.20.010 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to establish permits and entitlements that are decided by the Planning Commission. Each permit and entitlement type is described in this Chapter in terms of purpose and applicability, exemptions, review process, findings for approval, and conditions. General processing procedures are established in Chapter 17.14 (General Application Processing Procedures). Section 17.20.020 Entertainment Permit A. Purpose.The purpose of an Entertainment Permit is to provide a discretionary review process for new entertainment uses where food and/or beverage is sold concurrently with any form of entertainment in order to ensure public health and safety. B. Applicability. No person or business entity shall operate, conduct, or manage any place or premises open to the public where food or beverages are sold, offence for sale, or given away, and where any form of entertainment, as defined herein, is provided or furnished without first obtaining a permit so to do as hereinafter provided for in this Chapter. C. Exceptions. The provisions of this Chapter shall not be deemed to require a permit for any of the following: 1. Use of a radio or other electronic playback device, except when utilized by an announcer or disc jockey whose live performance consists of selecting or manipulating prerecorded selections of music or other sounds. 2. Entertainment provided for members and their guests at a private club where admission is not open to the public. 3. Entertainment conducted in connection with a regularly established motion picture theater, recreation park, circus, or fairground. 4. Entertainment conducted by or sponsored by any bona fide club, society, or association, organized or incorporated for benevolent, charitable, dramatic, or literary purposes, having an established membership, and which holds meetings at regular intervals of not less than once per three(3)month period, when proceeds, if any, arising from such entertainment are used for the purpose of such club, society, or association. 17.20-1 Item F-53 Article II, Chapter 17.20 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code • L Strict or literal interpretation:and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. ii. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. iii. Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. iv. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. V. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. F. Conditions. The Planning Commission is authorized to grant a Variance to achieve those purposes as prescribed in accordance with the procedure in this Section and impose reasonable conditions as the Commission may deem necessary to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses;to preserve the public health, safety,and welfare; • and to enable the Commission to make the findings required by Subsection 17.20.030.E(Findings). Section 17.20.040 Design Review A. Purpose. This Section establishes the review procedures for residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional development proposals to facilitate project review by local responsible agencies and the Development/Design Review Committees in a timely and efficient manner, to ensure that development projects comply with all applicable local design guidelines, standards, and ordinances; to minimize adverse effects on surrounding properties and the environment; and to maintain consistency with the General Plan,which promotes high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the physical, economic, and social character of Rancho Cucamonga. In addition,the City finds that a Design Review process will support the implementation of the General Plan, as it stresses quality community design standards. The City further finds that the quality of certain residential, institutional, commercial, and industrial uses has a substantial impact upon the visual appeal, environmental soundness, economic stability, and property values of the City. This Section is not intended to restrict imagination, innovation, or variety, but rather to focus on community design principles which can result in creative imaginative solutions for the project and a quality design for the City. It is the purpose of this Section to: 1. Recognize the interdependence of land values and aesthetics and provide a' method by which the City may implement this interdependence to its benefit. • 17.20-4 Item F-54 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article II,Chapter 17.20 2. Encourage the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property within the City along with associated facilities, such as signs, landscaping, parking areas, and streets. 3. Maintain the public health,safety and general welfare,and property throughout the City. 4. Assist private and public developments to be more cognizant of public concerns for the aesthetics of development. 5. Reasonably ensure that new developments, including residential, institutional, commercial, and industrial developments, do not have an adverse aesthetic, health, safety, or architecturally related impact upon •existing adjoining properties, or the City in general. 6. Implement those sections of the City's General Plan that specifically refer to the preservation and enhancement of the particular character and unique assets of this City and its harmonious development. 7. Minimize the effects of grading by discouraging mass grading and excessive slopes to ensure that the natural character of terrain is retained. 8. Preserve significant topographic features, including rock outcroppings, native plant materials, and natural hydrology, while also encouraging improved drainage from lots directly to a street, storm drain, or through a public or privately maintained easement. 9. Limit the. impact of slopes on adjacent developed properties and limit construction on identified seismic or geologic hazard areas. 10. Encourage the use of a variety of housing styles,split-level grading techniques, varied lot sizes, site design densities, maintenance of views, and arrangement and spacing to accomplish grading policies. 11. Help ensure that adequate school facilities for all existing and future residential development in the City are provided. 12. Help insure that adequate levels of public services are provided for existing and future development in the City. 13. Encourage orderly development of residences within areas more readily served by public services. 14. Encourage the development of master planned projects that provide the service needs of the residents of these projects. 15. Encourage use of energy conservation techniques in new residential development. B. Applicability.An application for Design Review is required for commercial, industrial, institutional, and.residential projects with five (5)or more dwelling units involving the 17.20-5 Item F-55 Article Il, Chapter 17.20 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code issuance of a Building Permit for construction or reconstruction of a structure which meets the following criteria. Projects of a limited size and scope that do not meet the below criteria may require an application for Minor Design Review as defined in Section 17.16.130(Minor Design Review). 1. New construction on vacant property where the proposed buildings are over ten thousand (10,000)square feet in size. 2. Structural additions or new buildings which are equal to or exceed fifty percent (50%) of the floor area of existing on-site building(s), or have a minimum ten thousand(10,000)square feet in size. 3. Reconstruction projects which are equal to fifty percent(50%)of the floor area of existing on-site building(s), or have a minimum ten thousand (10,000) square feet in size. 4. Any project being proposed along a special boulevard as defined by the General Plan, except for structures within projects with an approved Master Plan. 5. All projects which are master planned. Once the Master Plan, including architectural guidelines, has been approved by the Planning Commission, individual structures may be approved by the Planning Director. • 6. All shopping centers over ten thousand (10,000) square feet in size, except individual structures may be approved by the Planning Director where a Master Plan, including architectural guidelines, has been approved by the Planning Commission. 7. Certain projects within a hillside area are subject to review pursuant to Section 17.52(Hillside Development). 8. All projects within Mixed Use Zoning Districts. C. Review Process.The Design Review Procedure is outlined below. 1. Scheduling for committee review. Upon acceptance of a complete application for Design Review approval,a project shall be set on the first available agenda for committee reviews. The applicant and any persons requesting notice will be notified at least ten(10)days prior to the meetings. 2. All development proposals for Design Review are initially reviewed by the Technical_ aand Desia committees: (1) Design Review Committee—architecture and site planning; and (23) Technical Review Committee — compliance with technical code requirements. Each committee shall make a recommendation on each project for consideration by the Planning Commission, if applicable. .....%, ,: i. .:......: 3. Design Review Committee. Review and analysis by the Design Review Committee will consider design elements, such as, but not limited to, • 17.20-6 Item F-56 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article II, Chapter 17.20 compatibility of the project to surrounding properties,relationship of the design and layout of the project to the site, architectural design, and use of materials, grading, landscaping, screening and buffering techniques of adjacent properties, signs, and open space.This committee will determine if the project adequately meets City design guidelines and standards, and will transmit an appropriate recommendation to the Planning Commission. The recommendation of the Design Review Committee will be based on the project conforming to the following criteria: L The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan,design guidelines of the appropriate district, and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area, such as designated historic districts, theme areas, Specific Plans, Community Plans, boulevards, or planned developments. ii. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing,or future developments and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. iii. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this Section and the City's General Plan. iv. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. If the project is found to be not acceptable by the committee, the Planning Director will inform the applicant of the design issues and may suggest possible alternatives that would improve the design of the project. The committee will then direct the applicant to return to the committee with the revisions and/or work with staff to resolve the concerns prior to final approval by the Planning Commission: 4. Technical Review Committee. Review by this committee will consider items such as, but not limited to, circulation, street improvements, right-0f-way dedication, utility easements, grading, drainage facilities, storm drain improvements, uniform building code requirements, security, fire flow, emergency access, location of fire hydrants,water and sewer line connections and sizing,water pressure, permit fees, streetscape and landscape standards, setbacks, parking, and requirements for environmental processing. The committee will require changes in -ahy development,for compliance with adopted codes and standards.They may also make recommendations to the Planning Commission on any policy issues or areas not covered by existing codes and standards. 17.20-7 Item F-57 Article II, Chapter 17.20 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 6-.5. Other necessary committees as applicable(e.g.,trails). D. Findings. The Planning Commission shall make the following findings before approving a Design Review application: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan; 2. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; 3. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. • E. Conditions.The Planning Commission is authorized to approve or deny applications and to impose reasonable conditions upon such approval, as the Commission may deem necessary to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses,to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare, and to enable the Commission to make the findings required by Subsection 17.20.040.D(Findings). Section 17.20.050 Adult Entertainment Permit A. Purpose. These regulations are intended to prevent problems of blight and deterioration which can be brought about by the concentration of adult entertainment businesses in close proximity to each other or proximity to other incompatible uses such as schools for minors, public parks, and residentially zoned districts. The City council finds that it has been demonstrated in various communities that the concentration of adult entertainment businesses causes an increase in the number of transients in the area and an increase in crime and can cause other businesses and residents to move elsewhere. It is therefore the purposes of this Section to establish establishes reasonable and uniform regulations to prevent the concentration of adult establishments or their close proximity to incompatible uses, while permitting the location of adult businesses in certain areas. B. Applicability. The permittee must apply for a new Adult Entertainment Permit as follows: 1. Prior to establishment of a new adult entertainment establishment or any change in the location of the adult entertainment establishment. • 17.20-8 Item F-58 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III,Chapter 17.30 Chapter 17.30 Allowed Land Use by Base Zoning District Sections: Section17.30.010 Purpose.............................................................................................17.30-1 Section 17.30.020 Classification of Land Uses...............................................................17.30-1 Section 17.30.030 Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements...................................17.30-2 Section 17.30.040 Other Allowed Use Provisions.........................................................17.30-10 Section 17.30.010 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to establish allowed land uses and corresponding requirements for permits and entitlements for each of the City's base zoning districts. Uses allowed herein are consistent with and implement the corresponding land use designations in the City's General Plan. Allowed land uses include both primary and accessory uses that are permanent in nature. Regulations for temporary uses are listed.separately in Chapter 17.104(Temporary Uses). Section 17.30.020 Classification of Land Uses In order to simplify land use regulations, land uses listed in this Chapter and throughout this Title have been grouped into general categories on the basis of common function, product, or compatibility characteristics. These allowed use categories are called "use classifications." Use classifications describe one or more uses having similar characteristics but do not list every use or activity that may appropriately be within the classification. Each land use is described in Chapter 17.32 (Allowed Use Descriptions). For example, "personal service use" includes a wide range of individual personal service uses (beauty parlor, dry cleaning, tanning salons, tailors). Rather than listing all such uses individually throughout this Title, "personal service use" is listed once and is further described in Chapter 17.32(Allowed Use Descriptions). The following rules apply to use classifications: A. Specific Use Regulations.Additional use regulations for speck land uses are listed in Article V(Specific Use Requirements). B. Temporary Uses. Land use classifications in this Chapter identify both primary and secondary or accessory uses that are permanent in nature. Temporary uses are separately listed and regulated in Chapter 17.104(Temporary Uses). C. Uses Not Listed. Land uses that are not listed in the zoning district tables are not allowed, except as otherwise provided for in this Title. D. Illegal Uses. No use that is illegal under local,state, or federal law shall be allowed in any zoning district within the city. E. Overlay Zoning Districts. When a property is located within an Overlay Zoning District, any special allowed use provisions associated with said Overlay Zoning District shall apply. If the special allowed use provisions for the Overlay Zoning District are in conflict with the allowed use provisions of the base zoning district, the allowed use provisions for the Overlay Zoning District shall prevail. 17.30.1 Item F-59 Article III,Chapter 17.30 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code • TABLE 17.30.030-1 ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT .:;fir '_ � •; .Y Adult Day Care p p p P P P P N N N NJ NJ NJ N N N N N N P N N Home Caretaker Housing C C C C C C C P P P N N N N C C C C PIC P P Dwelling, Multi- N N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Family Dwelling, Second p p p p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Unit(1) Dwelling, Single- p p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Family Dwelling,Two-Family N N P P P P P N N N I N I N N N N N N N N N N N Emergency Shelter N N N N N N N N N P N N N N N C N N N N N N Family Day Care C C C C C CC N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N Home, Large(") • Family Day Care p p P p p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home,Small Guest House P P P I N I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I N N N Group Residential C C CIC C C C C C C C N C N N N N N N I C N N Home Occupation(2) P P P I P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P I P N N Live-Work Facility N N N I N N N P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Manufactured Home (3) PPP PNNNN NNN NNNNNNNN PNN Mobile Home Park(3) C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N NJ N N N Residential Care Facility N N N C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Residential Care p p p p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home Single-Room N N N P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Occupancy Facility Transitional Housing P P I P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Agrihilture and Animal-Retafed Uses Agricultural Uses N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Animal Keeping, P P P P P P .p N N N N N N -N N N N N N P N- N•. Domestic Pets(4) Animal Keeping, C C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N Exotic Animals(4) • 17.30-4 Item F-60 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III,Chapter 17.30, 171 Veterinary Facility C N . . . . N C N P P C C C N N PI P P _ N NJ N N - �ME Auto Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Dismantling Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N C NC N N P N C C N N N N N N Sales and Rental. I I I I I I I Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N N N N N N N Sales,Autobroker Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N , P P P P N P P P P N N N N N N Sales,Wholesale I I I I I I I Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N I N N N N N N N N N C . P P N N N N Storage Auto Parts Sales N N N I N N I N N P I P I N NJ P1 N N N N N I N N N N Car Washing and N N N N N N N C C C C N C N N N N N N N N N Detailing Recreational Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I N C C C N N N N Storage Service Stations N NJ NJ N NJ NICIC C I P I C N CICIC C N NINI'N N N1 Vehicle Services, N NINI N N N N I N N C N N N N N P P PININ N N Major I I I I VehicI6 Services, C P N N P N NINI N N N N N N N N N N C I C N P Minor I I I L- 7'-a -t- _- - - - L 41 1w ,Q. ��Mffidlw-W. - Fuel Storage and N N N N N N N N I N I N. N NJ NJ N N C C CINI N N Distribution I I I I I I I I Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N NINIP PIN N N N N N Custom Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N N N Heavy Manufacturing, Heavy-Minimum N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Impact . I . Manufacturing,Light N N N I N N N N N NINJ N- N N NIP- P N N N NJ NJ Manufacturing, NJ NJ NJ N N N N N N N N N N . N P P P P- N N N N Medium N Microb[gVe -P P Printingand... -N "N "N "N 'N 'N "N "N -'N P 'N N N 'N 'P"P' N- N N 'N 'N'j'N I Publishing I - - Recycling Facility, P P N N Collection N I N N N N N N P N NJ 17.30-9 Item F-61 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III, Chapter 17.32 Chapter 17.32 Allowed Use Descriptions Sections: Section 17.32.010 Purpose.............................................................................................17.32-1 Section 17.32.020 Allowed Use Descriptions..................................................................17.32-1 Section 17.32.010 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to describe use classifications listed in Chapter 17.30 (Allowed Land Use by Base Zoning District). Use classifications are land uses that have been grouped into general categories on the basis of common function,product,or compatibility characteristics.This Chapter should be used as a reference for the land use classifications listed throughout this Title. Additional definitions for specialized terms used in the Zoning Code can be found in Article VIII (Glossary). Section 17.32.020 Allowed Use Descriptions The following list represents the complete list of allowed uses by land use classification and corresponding descriptions as used in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District) and throughout this Title. Individual use classifications describe one or more uses having similar characteristics, but do not list every use or activity that may appropriately be within the classification.Allowed uses are organized into the following seven use categories as follows: • Residential Uses • Agriculture and Animal-Related Uses • Recreation, Resource Preservation, Open Space, Education, and Public Assembly Uses • Utility, Transportation, Public Facility, and Communication Uses • Retail, Service, and Office Uses • Automobile and Vehicle Uses • Industrial, Manufacturing, and Processing Uses A. Residential Uses. 1. Adult Day Care Home. Defined by state law as the provision of nonmedical care to six or fewer adults, including seniors, in the provider's own home,for a period of less than 24)hours at a time. Homes serving more than six(6)adults are included in Adult Day Care Facility. 2. Caretaker Housing.A residence that is accessory to a.site with a nonresidential primary use and that is needed for security, 24-hour care or supervision, or monitoring of facilities, equipment, or other conditions on the site. 17.32-1 Item F-62 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III,Chapter 17.32 automated teller machines (ATM) are considered an accessory use and not part of this definition 10. Bar/Nightclub.Any bar, cocktail lounge,discotheque,or similar establishment, which may also provide live entertainment(e.g.,music and/or dancing,comedy — subject to an entertainment permit) in conjunction with alcoholic beverage sales. These facilities do not include bars that are part of a larger restaurant. Includes bars, taverns, pubs, and similar establishments where any food service is subordinate to the sale of alcoholic beverages. May also OnGlude theI . Bars and nightclubs may include outdoor food and beverage areas. 11. Bed and Breakfast Inn. A residential structure with one family in permanent residence with up to six bedrooms rented for overnight lodging, where meals may be provided subject to applicable Health Department regulations. A bed and breakfast inn with more than six guest rooms is considered a hotel or motel and is included under the definition of Hotels and Motels. 12. Building Materials Store and Yard. A retail establishment selling lumber and other large building materials, where most display and sales occur indoors. Includes stores selling to the general public, even if contractor sales account for a major proportion of total sales. Includes incidental retail ready-mix concrete operations, except where excluded by a specific zoning district. Establishments primarily selling electrical, plumbing, heating, and air conditioning equipment and supplies are classified in Wholesale,Storage,and Distribution (Heavy, Light and Medium.) Hardware stores are listed in the definition of Retail,General,even if they sell some building materials.Also see Home Improvement Supply Store for smaller specialty stores. 13. Business Support Services. Establishments primarily within buildings, providing other businesses with services such as maintenance, repair and service,testing, rental, etc. Support services include, but are not limited to: a. Equipment repair services (except vehicle repair, see Vehicle Services); b. Commercial art and design(production); C. Computer-related services(rental,.repair); d. Copying, quick printing, and. blueprinting services (other than those defined as Printing and Publishing); e. Equipment rental businesses within buildings(rental yards are Storage Yards); f. Film processing laboratories; g. Heavy equipment repair services where repair occurs on the client site; h. Janitorial services; 17.32-11 Item F-63 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III,Chapter 17.32 unprepared unpackaged food or foodstuffs of any kind. For the purposes of this Section, a mobile food vehicle shall also include any trailer or wagon equipped and used as described in this paragraph and pulled by a vehicle. 41. Mortuary/Funeral Home. A funeral home and parlor,where the deceased are prepared for burial or cremation and funeral services may be conducted. This use does not include Crematorium, which is a separate use classification. 42. Office, Accessory. An office that is incidental and accessory to another business or sales activity that is the primary use(part of the same tenant space or integrated development). The qualification criteria for this definition is that the floor area of the accessory office use shall not exceed 50 percent of the total net habitable or leasable floor area of the tenant space for a single-use development or the combined floor area of an integrated development for a mixed-use project. 43. Office, Business and Professional. This use listing includes offices of administrative businesses providing direct services to consumers (e.g., insurance companies, utility companies), government agency and service facilities (e.g., post office, civic center), professional offices (e.g., accounting, attomeys,public relations),and offices engaged in the production of intellectual property (e.g., advertising, architecture, computer programming). This use does not include medical offices (see Medical Services, General); temporary offices,or offices that are incidental and accessory to another business or sales activity that is the primary use (see Office, Accessory). Outdoor storage of • materials is prohibited. 44. Pawnshop. Any room, store, building, or other place in which the business of pawn brokering, or the business of lending money upon personal property, pawns,or pledges,or the business of purchasing articles from vendors or their assignees at prices agreed upon at or before the time of such purchase, is engaged in, carried on, or conducted. 45. Personal Services.Establishments providing nonmedical services as a primary use, including, but not limited to, barber and beauty shops (including permanent makeup), weight loss clinics, day spas, spiritualist reading or astrology forecasting, clothing rental, dry cleaning pickup stores with limited equipment, home electronics and small appliance repair, laundromats (self- service laundries),shoe repair shops,and tailors.These uses may also include accessory retail sales of products related to the services provided. This use classification does not include massage or tattoo establishments, which are separately classified herein. 46. Restaurant. A retail business selling food and beverages prepared and/or served on the site, for on- or off-premise consumption. Includes eating establishments where customers are served from a walk-up ordering counter for either on- or off-premise consumption and establishments where most customers are served.food at tables for on-premise consumption, but•may-. include providing food for take-out.Also includes coffee houses and accessory cafeterias as partof office and industrial uses. Restaurants are divided into feuF-three categories as follows: I 17.32-15 Item F-64 Article III,Chapter 17.32 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code a. Restaurant, No Liquor Service. Restaurants that do not serve liquor, including fast food establishments. b. Restaurant, Beer and Wine. Restaurants with liquor services limited to beer and wine for on-site consumption. May also include the brewing of beer as part of a brewpub or microbrewerv. C. Restaurant, Full Liquor Service. Restaurants with a full range of liquor service, including beer, one, and distilled spirits, all for on-site consumption. 47. Retail,Accessory. The retail sales of various products(including food service) in a store or similar facility that is located within a health care, hotel, office, or industrial complex. These uses include but are not limited to pharmacies, gift shops, and food service establishments within hospitals, and convenience stores and food service establishments within hotel, office, and industrial complexes. This use category also includes retail associated with industrial uses for the products sold, distributed, or manufactured on-site. Such retail area shall not exceed 25 percent of the total square footage of the tenant space of a single use development or the combined floor area of an integrated development in a mixed-use project. 48. Retail, General. Stores and shops selling single and multiple lines of merchandise. These stores and lines of merchandise include, but are not limited to, bakeries (all production in support of on-site sales), clothing and accessories, collectibles, department stores, drug and discount stores, dry goods, fabrics and sewing supplies, florists and houseplant stores (indoor sales, only; outdoor sales are plant nurseries and included in the definition of Garden Center/Plant Nursery), general stores, gift shops, hardware, hobby materials, musical instruments, parts and accessories, newsstands, pet supplies specialty shops, sporting goods and equipment, stationery, and variety stores. 49. Retail,Warehouse Club. Retail stores that emphasize the packaging and sale of products in large quantities or volumes, some at discounted prices. Sites and buildings are usually large and industrial in character. Patrons may be required to pay membership fees. 50. Secondhand Dealer.Any business where the primary or ancillary use includes buying, selling, trading, accepting for sale on consignment, accepting for auctioning,or auctioning secondhand tangible personal property such as"cash for gold This use classification does not include a°coin dealer"or participants at gun shows or events, pawnshops or secondhand stores. 51. Shooting Range. An enclosed firing range with targets for rifle or handgun practice. 52., .. Smoke Shop.An establishment that.either devotes.more,than 15,percent.of its, total floor area to smoking, drug, and/or tobacco paraphernalia or devotes more than a 2 foot by 4 foot(2 feet in depth maximum)section of shelf space for display for sale of smoking, drug, and/or tobacco paraphernalia. 17.32-16 Item F-65 Article III, Chapter 17.32 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code • 6. Manufacturing, Medium. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, compounding of materials, processing, assembly, packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and products which require frequent large container truck traffic or rail traffic, or the transport of heavy, bulky items.The new products are semi-finished to be a component for further manufacturing, fabrication, and assembly. These types of business establishments are customarily directed to inter-plant transfer or to order from industrial uses, rather than for direct sale to the domestic consumer.Such uses may include, but are not limited to, canned food; textile products; furniture and fixtures; converted paper and paper board products; plastic products made from purchased rubber, plastic,or resin;fabricated metal products made from sheet metal;electrical and electronic machinery,equipment,and supplies;and office, computing, and accounting machines. These activities may produce noise, odors, vibrations, illumination, or particulates that affect persons residing in or conducting business in the vicinity. Where 24-hour, on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. &7. Microbrewery.A small-scale brewery operation dedicated to the production of specialty beers and producing less than 15,000 barrels(465,000 U.S.gallons) Per year. Ancillary on-site tasting and/or retail sales of beers produced on-site for off-site consumption may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. �8. Printing and Publishing. Establishments engaged in printing by letterpress, lithography,gravure, screen,offset, or electrostatic(xerographic)copying,and other establishments serving the printing trade including bookbinding, typesetting, engraving, photoengraving, and electrotyping. This use also includes establishments that publish newspapers, books, and periodicals, and establishments manufacturing business forms and binding devices. Does not include "quick printing" services or desktop publishing which are included in Business Support Services. 8:9. Recycling Facility—Collection. A recycling facility used for the acceptance by donation, redemption, or purchase of recyclable materials from the public that does not occupy more than 500 square feet. This classification may include a mobile unit, kiosk-type units that may include permanent structures, and unattended containers placed for thedonation of recyclable materials. Also includes so-called "reverse vending machines," an automated mechanical device that accepts one or more types of empty beverage containers including, but not limited to,aluminum cans,glass bottles, and plastic bottles, and issues a cash refund or a redeemable credit slip with value of not less than the container's redemption value as determined by the State. s-10. Recycling Facility — Processing. A recycling facility located in a building or enclosed space and used for the collection and processing of recyclable materials. Processing means the preparation of material for efficient shipment or to an end-user's specifications -by such means as baling, bdquetting, -- compacting, flattening, grinding, crushing, mechanical sorting, shredding, cleaning, and remanufacturing. Collection of recycling materials as the sole activity is included in the definition of Recycling Facility—Collection. 17.32-20 Item F-66 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III,Chapter 17.36 Chapter 17.36 Development Standards by Base Zoning District Sections: Section 17.36.010 Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts...................17.36-1 Section 17.36.020 Development Standards for Mixed Use Zoning Districts................ 17.36-12 Section 17.36.030 Development Standards for Commercial&Office Zoning Districts..17.36-14 Section 17.36.040 Development Standards for Industrial Districts................................17.36-18 Section 17.36.050 Development Standards for Open Space Zoning Districts...............17.36-24 Section 17.36.010 Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts A. Purpose and Applicability. The purpose of this Section is to establish minimum development standards that.are unique to development projects within Residential Zoning Districts. Development standards in this Section apply to all land designated on the Zoning Map within a Residential Zoning District. B. Residential Districts Described. As identified in Chapter 17.26 (Establishment of Zoning Districts),the city includes six Residential Zoning Districts: 1. Very Low(VL) 2. Low(L) 3. Low Medium(LM) 4. Medium(M) 5. Medium High(MH) 6. High (H) C. Residential Site Development Standards. General site development standards for Residential Zoning Districts are listed in Table 17.36.010-1 (Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts). These development standards supplement the development standards in Article IV (Site Development Provisions) that apply to all zoning districts(e.g., parking, signs, landscaping, lighting). 17.36-1 Item F-67 Article III,Chapter 17.36 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code • TABLE 17.36.010-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIALZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/ VL t : LM _ M MF!< H. Zoning District Lot Area(minimum) 20,000 sf 7.200 sf 5,000 sf 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) Lot Area(minimum net avg) 22,500 sf 8,000 sf 5,000 sf 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) Lot Width(minimum) 90 ft(2) 65 ft(2) 50 ft(2) n/a n/a n/a Lot Width(comer lot) 100 ft 70 ft 50 ft n/a n/a n/a Lot Depth(minimum) 200 ft 100 ft 90 ft n/a n/a n/a Minimum Frontage 50 ft 40 ft 30 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Minimum Frontage(flag lot) 30 ft 20 ft 20 ft 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft Allowed Density(dwelling units per acrer- Minimum Density(3) n/a n/a 4 du/ac 8 du/ac 14 du/ac 24 du/ac Maximum Density 2 du/ac 4 du/ac 8 du/ac(4) 14 du/ac(4) 24 du/ac 30 du/ac Minimum Setback Front Yard(5) 42 ft(8) 37 ft(5) 32 ft(8) 37 ft(8) n/a n/a Comer Side Yard(5) 27 ft 27 ft 22 ft 27 ft n/a n/a Interior Side Yard(5) 10/15 ft 5/10 ft 5/10 ft 10 ft(7) n/a n/a • Rear Yard(5) 60 ft 20 ft 15 ft 10 ft(7) n/a n/a At Interior Site Boundary (Dwelling/Accessory NR(8) 15/5(7) 15/5(7) 15/5(7) Building) Building Height(maximum in feet]tsl Primary Buildings 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft(10) 40 ft(10) 55 ft(10) L*t Coverage(maximum lot coverage with buildings as a percentage of the parcel or project) Lot Coverage 25% 40% 50% 50% 50% 50% ©pen Space Requh*ment(mhiimum percentage of open space per parcel or project} Private Open Space (Ground Floor/Upper Story) 300/150 sf 225/150 sf 150/100 sf 150/100 sf Open Space(Private and Common) 40% 35% 35% 35% Minimum Patio/Porch Depth E ft(17) 6 ft(11) 6 ft(11) 6 ft(11) 6 ft(11) 6 ft(17) Minimum Dwelling Unit Size(12i" Single-Family 1,000 sf (attached and detached) Multi-Family(13) Efficiency/Studio 550 sf [Multi-Family('3) One Bedroom 650 sf • 17.36-2 Item F-68 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III,Chapter 17.36 5 e7x�rY•Y; ,5"CT .`•�'7'�a y. .'.-, .s r.;er',—�, ..N F,-•i"fir ';t+ ^�' k`'�� :"4} �?� - '�'• J:�``..f• :✓.s. � ..fir;-•t�"..,� ' Y �= '�+, `6�.� " ';�= "er .•.�-��.."",. ,� y�. LTi.y..;a;,i:.r,,E ..�'....��:...� Multi-Family(13) 800 sf Two Bedroom Mufti-Family(13) 950 sf Three or More Bedrooms _ • .r .-::.•r�,-"3�',' �,y x.3zw-..yi„ -�5�;+R' r ,.. �.drer.� ."%.�:�::i�: �•''=t. .a,.:ua'b ,.;' 1'0118 ,,. `" 'i•1'' `K'Y.3y',"'F..,,�..�r4s,:.'.* ^.f.+,.' ..� 2 r'''� •"-uisu� i. �xu-. _ Between buildings with no patio _ _ 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft or recessed patio Between patio fencelwall less _ _ 15 ft 15 ft 15 ft 15 ft than 5 feet in height Between patio fence/wall more _ _ 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft than 5 feet in height Between balconies above patio fence/wall more than 5 feet in — — 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft height Between a patio fence/wall and _ _ Y0 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft a building wall With common patio fence/wall — — 30 ft 30 ft 30.1 30 ft q}"�}'':,.• .{.6y-'^.�'SSG�1:> rNew..:4.. i.�.`. +T'.�fS ;1� :i.kv .:1L•7T:DY - Building to one-story detached garage/carport or other 6 fV15 ft 15 ft 15 15 accessory structure Building to wall or curb at 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft project entry Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record parcels less than 3 acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Average width,which shall vary accordingly.. VL-+/-10 feet LBLM-+/-5fee (3) Excluding land necessary for secondary streets and arterials and in hillside areas shall be dependent on the slopelcapacity factor contained in Chapter 17.52(Hillside Development Standards). (4) Developing muni-family in the LM district and single-family in the M district at the maximum density requires compliance with Standards for Higher Residential Densities as outfrned in Subsection 17.36.010.D. (5) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards.Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards POGkI096 by YOI (6) Average setback.which shall vary+/-5 feet.AmnP #s-6-feet•�sa (7)• Add 10 feet if ad/acent to VL,L,or LM district. (8) Applies to buildings two stories and taller in height.Add 10 more feet for each story over two stories. (9) In hillside areas,heights shall be limited to 30 feet (10) Limit one story within 100 feet of VL or L district for multiple-family dwellings. 01) Free and dear of obstructions. (12) Senior citizen projects are exempted from this requirement. (13) To assure that smaller units are not concentrated in any one area or project,the following percentage limitations of the total number of units shall apply: 10% for efficiency/studio and 35%for one bedroom or up to 35% combined. Subject to a Conditional Use Permit,the Planning Commission may authorize a greater ratio of efficiency or one-bedroom units when a development exhibits innovative design qualities and a balanced mix of unit sizes and types (14). "Front'is defined as the face of thebuilding.or unit with the major glass area and/or major recreation area and may include access to that private recreation area. This access may or may not relate to the primary entrance to the building that faces the street or dmre,•therefore,some buildings may have more than one front. 17.36-3 Item F-69 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III,Chapter 17.36 • F. Other Miscellaneous Residential Development Standards. 1. Zero Lot Line. The dwelling unit may be placed on one interior side property line with a zero setback,and the dwelling unit setback on the other interior side property line shall be a minimum of ten feet (10'), excluding the connecting elements such as fences, walls, and trellises. Pools, decks, garden features, and other similar elements shall be permitted within the ten foot(10') setback area, provided, however, no structure, with the exception of fences or walls, shall be placed within easements required below. Where adjacent zero lot line dwellings are not constructed against a common lot line, the builder or developer must provide for a perpetual wall maintenance easement of five feet (6) in width along the adjacent lot and parallel with such wall. 2. Usable Yard Area. For single-family detached/semi-detached subdivisions, a minimum fifteen feet (15') of flat, usable rear yard area shall be provided between the house and top or toe of non-retained slope banks or to the retaining wall in the case of retained cut or fill per City grading standard drawings. However, in areas of hilly or sloped terrain where grading is being designed to minimize alteration to the natural land form, usable open space should be provided in the form of decks, patios, balconies,or some similar form of built structure designed to fit the natural topography rather than as graded level yard area. 3. Visitor Parking. For projects with private streets or driveways, visitor parking required by Chapter 17.64(Parking and Loading Standards)shall be provided • in off-street visitor parking bays within one hundred fifty feet (150') of all dwelling units. Visitor parking shall be clearly delineated through proper signage. Signage may include, but is not limited to, pavement marking, freestanding signs designating the stalls as visitor parking, and directory signs guiding visitors to the visitor parking area. 4. Driveway Depth/Width. All lots within single-family detached and semi- detached residential developments shall have driveways designed to accommodate the parking of two (2) automobiles in a manner that does not obstruct sidewalks or streets. Driveways shall have a minimum depth of nineteen feet (19') and width of eighteen feet (18'). Drive approach shall be developed per City standards. 5. Amenities. To enhance the quality of life for multi-family development, additional amenities shall be required as follows: a. Storage Space. Each unit shall be provided with a minimum of one hundred twenty-five(125)cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space. The storage space shall be located outside of the dwelling at grade or floor level and easily accessible by the residents. The design of the exterior storage space shall be architecturally integrated and/or compatible to the dwellings. The individual storage space units can be located within the fully enclosed garages designated for that dwelling unit. • 17.36-7 Item F-70 Article III,Chapter 17.36 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code b. Laundry Facility. Each unit shall be provided with a hookup for a washing machine and clothes dryer in the interior of the dwelling, or common laundry facilities shall be provided and equipped with washing machines and clothes dryers at a rate of one washing machine and clothes dryer per five (5) units. Common laundry facilities should be conveniently located for all residents within the complex. Common laundry facilities can be within freestanding buildings, attached to dwelling units,or within the recreation room.The design of the common laundry facilities shall be architecturally compatible to the dwellings. 6. Roofing Materials.All new and existing development within Residential Zoning Districts shall have roofing material made of tile, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles. Other roofing materials such as metal, slate, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles, may be approved by the approval authority if it is determined that the roof material enhances the building design. Any replacement of existing roofing materials shall be consistent with the existing material or upgraded to a higher quality roofing material.For example,a composition shingle roof can be replaced with composition shingles or can be upgraded to higher quality roofing material such as file or slate. 6J. Roof Mounted A/C Units Replacement of existing permitted roof mounted AIC units that are located on residential development may be permitted. All other proposed roof mounted AIC units shall be placed entirely out of public view. -.8. Slope Planting. Slope banks 5 feet.or greater in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate groundcover for erosion control. Slope banks 5 feet or greater in vertical height an of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows:one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 square feet of slope area, one 1- gallon or larger size shrub for each 100 square feet of slope area, and appropriate groundcover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet vertical and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size per each 250 square feet of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. Maintenance by a Homeowners' Association may be required by the Planning Commission on a case-by-case basis. G. Special Streetscape. It is the intent of this Section to create streetscape standards for landscape,building,and parking setbacks that help to identify the function of streets and to improve the scenic quality of the community. Table 17.36.020-3 sets forth the minimum setbacks based on street classification in the General Plan Circulation Plan. These setbacks shall be required of all new developments that contain or abut any one of the street classifications listed in the table. Setbacks shall be measured from the face of the ultimate curb location. 17.36-8 Item F-71 0 0 0 ' ' Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article IV, Chapter 97.42 TABLE 17.42.040-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Minimum Setback Distance Accessory from Property tine or Other Structures Maximum Rear Yard Lot Mlarnan Structure(Type) pry Coverage(') height Front Rear Side Street Side Yard Building Solid Roof Structure Not permitted 5 ft(2) 5 ft(21(3)14) Not permitted ts► (1)(2) 30%required yard area(8) 16 ft Open Roof Structure Not permitted 5 ft 5 ft 13► Not permitted 11►(2) n/a 1e►(8) 16 ft No Water Features No minimum 3 ft 5 ft Not permitted minimum n/a 16 ft Pools/spas Not permitted 5 ft 17► 5 ft(7) 5 ft 17► NO °b " d 5 ft minimum afean/a Pool Accessories Not permitted 5 ft 5 ft Not permitted No 30-05;FeqUiFed yard fva8 ft minimum arean)a CD — 3 Play Equipment Not permitted 5 ft 5 ftNot permitted NO n minimum /a n/a Deck/Patio Not permitted 5 ft 5 ft Not permitted NO 30%required yard n/a minimum 2real10►l4a. Outdoor Entertainment Not permitted 5 ft 5 ft No minimum! ► No Features e minimum n/a n/a Temporary, Portable Not permitted 5 ft 5 ft Not permitted 11112) ° Shade Structures P 30/a required yard area loft Table Notes: (1) No minimum setback required.Accessory buildings may be attached to and have a common wall with the main building or,when located as required by this Chapter,may be connected to the main building by a breezeway. (2) Accessory buildings not exceeding 6 feet in height at the highest point may be built to the side and/or rear property line,provided that the accessory structure meets minimum building code requirements for distance between the accessory structure and the primary building. (3) The S:foot side yard setback requirement for solid and open roof structures applies when the structure is located within the rear yard setback area.Otherwise,the some side yard setbacks as the primary structure apply(see Figure 17.42.040-2). (4) For reverse corner lots,the street side yard setback shall be the same as the front yard setback for the adjacent key lot. (5) Accessory structures with solid roofs that are less than 6 feet tall and 120 square feet in area can be located In the street side yard. (6) Trellis-type and open-roof structures are exempt from lot coverage calculations. (7) Measurement from water's edge.Related operating equipment(filters,pumps and heaters)not exceeding 6 feet in height can be located within the rear,side or street side yard setback. (8) Accessory structure shall not exceed the overall lot coverage limitation for the property(see Chapter 17.36). (9) if less=than 6 feet in height no minimum setback Is required. If taller than 6 feet In height,not allowed in the street side yard area: I (10) Decks over 3 feet in height shall be counted!award lot coverage c Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article IV, Chapter 17.60 Chapter 17.60 Outdoor Sales, Storage, Display, and Seating Standards Sections: Section 17.60.010 Purpose.............................................................................................17.60-1 Section 17.60.020 Permit Requirements, Exemptions, and Liabilities.............................17.60-1 Section 17.60.030 Development, Operation, and Maintenance ......................................17.60-2 Section 17.60.010 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to regulate permanent and temporary outdoor display, seating, and storage uses. The intent of these regulations is to encourage outdoor displays and activities that are compatible with associated and nearby uses and do not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle circulation or create an unsightly appearance of unrestricted clutter. Section 17.60.020 Permit Requirements, Exemptions, and Liabilities The following outdoor activities shall be subject to the permit requirements as listed below. A. Permanent Outdoor Display and Sales. If the display and sales are part of the primary use it is permitted by right, subject to the provisions of Section 17.60.030.8. (Standards for Outdoor Display and Sales). If not part of the primary use then permanent outdoor display and sales may be permitted with the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit(CUP). B. Temporary Outdoor Display and Sale. Permitted in commercial districts with the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit (TUP) and subject to the provisions of Section 17.60.030.8(Standards for Outdoor Display and Sales). C. Permanent Outdoor Storage. Permanent outdoor storage is allowed in conjunction with the primary use if approved as part of the original planning entitlement request. New permanent outdoor storage requested in conjunction with an existing use or development shall require issuance of a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with Section 17.16(Permits and Entitlements Decided by the Planning Director). D. Temporary Outdoor Storage.Temporary outdoor storage shall require the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit pursuant to and consistent with the requirements of Section 17.16.070(Temporary Use Permit).The uses and activities listed below shall be exempt from the requirement for a Temporary Use Permit. 1. Storage of construction materials and equipment as part of an active construction site, provided a valid Building Permit or Improvement Permit is in effect and the materials and equipment are stored on the construction site pursuant to approved permit(s). -- 2: Emergency facilities, to.accommodate emergency public health and--safety• - � Y � needs and activities. 17.60-1 Item F-73 Article IV,Chapter 17.60 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code E. Outdoor Dining Areas. If not part of the original development permit for the principal use, outdoor seating may be permitted in all zoning districts except for residential zoning districts, subject to approval of an Conditional Use Permit as established in Section 17.16.120 (Conditional Use Permit) and any other applicable entitlements (e.g., Minor Design Review). In all cases, permanent outdoor seating shall be consistent with the development standards of this Chapter. 1. Required Findings for Approval of Outdoor Seating.The designated approving authority may issue a Conditional Use Permit (Section 17.16.120) if the proposed outdoor seating: a.. Allows for a continuous pedestrian path of travel of at least four feet(4') in width and would not obstruct fire, pedestrian,and wheelchair access. b. Does not unduly interfere with pedestrian traffic on the sidewalk. C. Does not unduly interfere with access of public employees and utility workers to meters, fire hydrants, or other objects (street hardware) in the right-of-way. d. Allows for unobstructed view of necessary authorized traffic devices. Section 17.60.030 Development, Operation, and Maintenance • A. General Development Standards.for All Activities. The development standards listed below apply to all outdoor display, sales, and storage activities. 1. Location. Outdoor activities may be located within the public right-of-way, in required parking spaces or in designed vehicle drive aisles, or within required landscape planter areas only where permitted with the issuance of an Encroachment Permit, or in accordance with the requirements of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to the requirements of Section 17.16.120 (Conditional Use Permit) or a Temporary Use Permit, pursuant to the requirements of Section 17.16.070 (Temporary Use Permit). Outdoor activities shall occupy a fixed, specifically approved location that does not disrupt the normal function of the site or its circulation and does not encroach upon required setbacks, public rights-of-way, driveways, emergency vehicle/fire access lanes, landscaped areas, parking spaces, pedestrian walkways or pathways, bicycle lanes, seating, enhanced pedestrian amenities, such as trash receptacles and drinking fountains, or any other requirement listed in the Building Code. 2. Hours of Operation. Except as otherwise provided, hours of operation for outdoor activities shall be consistent with those for the corresponding primary use. 3. Noise. Any noise generated by the outdoor activity shall be consistent with the City's Noise Ordinance. 4. Signs. No additional business identification or advertising signs for the outdoor activity may be permitted above the maximum allowable sign area for the corresponding primary use as established in Chapter 17.74(Sign Regulations • 17.60-2 Item F-74 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article IV,Chapter 17.60 for Private Property),except when the outdoor activity is the primary use(e.g., Christmas tree lot). 5. Maintenance. Outdoor activity areas shall be kept free of garbage and other debris, and shall not encroach into required sidewalk clearance areas as follows:all outdoor activity areas shall leave a minimum horizontal clear space of six feet (6') or such greater amount of clear space as the Public Works Director finds necessary to protect and enhance pedestrian and vehicle traffic in the sidewalk area. B. Standards for Outdoor Display and Sales. The following development standards shall apply to all permanent and temporary outdoor display and sales activities: 1. Associated with the Primary Use.All outdoor display and sales activities shall be associated with the primary use of the property. Only those goods and services associated with the primary use may be stored, sold, or displayed.All outdoor display and sales activities that are independent of the primary use shall be considered their own primary use and regulated as such. 2. Maximum Area. Unless otherwise authorized by a Conditional Use Permit,the area used for permanent outdoor display and sales of.materials shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the gross floor area of the corresponding commercial building. Vehicle and equipment sales and rentals (e.g., automobile, boat, RV, construction equipment) are exempt from this requirement,provided storage and display is limited to vehicles offered for sale or rental only and all other development code requirements are satisfied. 3. The aggregate display area shall not exceed twenty-five percent(25%)of the linear frontage of the store front or six(6)linear feet,whichever is greater and items may not project more than four feet(4')from the store front. 4. Height Limit. Displayed outdoor sales, other than plant materials for sale(e.g., Christmas trees, nursery trees)shall not exceed a height of six feet(6')above finished grade,unless a greater height is allowed through Use Permit approval. 5. No item,or any portion thereof,shall be displayed on public property;provided, however, items may be displayed within the public right-of-way if an encroachment permit has first been procured from the City. 6. Items shall be displayed only during the hours that the business conducted inside the building on the premises is open for business. 7. No item shall be displayed in a manner that causes a safety hazard;obstructs the entrance to any building; interferes with,or impedes the flow of, pedestrian or vehicle traffic;obstructs in part or in whole an emergency vehicle/fire access lane; is unsightly or creates any other condition that is detrimental to the appearance of the premises or any surrounding property; or in any other manner is detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare or causes a public nuisance. 17.60-3 Item F-75 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article IV,Chapter 17.82 • Chapter 17. 2 p 8 Water Efficient Landscaping Sections: Section 17.82.010 Purpose and Intent............................................................................17.82-1 Section 17.82.020 Applicability.......................................................................................17.82-1 Section 17.82.030 Exceptions ........................................................................................17.82-1 Section 17.82.040 Development of a Water Budget.......................................................17.82-2 Section 17.82.050 Landscape Design Guidelines...........................................................17.82-3 Section 17.82.060 Soil and Grading Requirements.........................................................17.82-4 Section 17.82.070 Implementation..................................................................................17.82-5 Section 17.82.080 Compliance/Enforcement..................................................................17.82-7 Section 17.82.090 Recycled Water.................................................................................17.82-7 Section 17.82.100 Stormwater Management..................................................................17.82-8 Section 17.82.010 Purpose and Intent This Chapter implements the model ordinance adopted by the State of California pursuant to Govemment Code§65595 to require the efficient use of water resources. Section 17.82.020 Applicability A. This Chapter shall apply to the following: 1. New construction and rehabilitated landscapes for public agency projects and ® private development projects with a total landscape area equal to or greater than twenty-five hundred (2,500) square feet requiring a building permit, plan check, or design review. 16. New construction and rehabilitated landscapes which are developer-installed residential projects with a total landscape area equal to or greater than twenty- five hundred (2,500) square feet requiring a building permit, plan check, or design review. 17. New construction projects which are homeowner-installed residential projects with a total landscape area equal to or greater than five thousand (5,000) square feet requiring a Building Permit, Plan Check, or Design Review. Section 17.82.030 Exceptions A. This Chapter does not apply to: 1. Registered local, state, or federal historical sites. 18. Ecological restoration projects that do not require a permanent irrigation system. 19. Mined-land reclamation projects that do not require a permanent,.irrigation. system. 20. Botanical gardens and arboretums open to the public. 17.82.1 Item F-76 Article IV,Chapter 17.82 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.82.040 Development of a Water Budget A. Intent. In order to conserve water, applicable projects shall develop a water budget. The water budget is based on the Maximum Applied Water Allowance.(MAWA),which is a calculation of the maximum amount of water allowed to be used within the landscape area, and the Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU), which is the actual amount of water to be used within the landscape area.The ETWU cannot exceed the MAWA. B. Establishing a Water Budget. 1. Maximum Applied Water Allowance. A landscape's maximum applied water allowance shall be calculated using the following formula: MAWA=(ETo)(0.627)(LA)[(0.627)+(.3 x SLA)) Where: MAWA=Maximum Applied Water Allowance ETo = Evapotranspiration Rate 0.7=Evapotranspiration(ET)Adjustment Factor LA=Landscape Area 0.62 =Conversion factor(to gallons) SLA=Special Landscape Area 21. Estimated Total Water Use.A landscape's Estimated Total Water Use shall be calculated using the following formula: ETWU=(ETo)(0.62)I PF x HA+SLA l 0.71 J Where: ETWU =Estimated Total Water Use ETo= Evapotranspiration Rate 0.62=Conversion factor(to gallons) PF = Plant Factor HA=Hydrozone area(square feet) 0.71 = Irrigation efficiency SLA= Special Landscape Area(square feet) The evapotranspiration rate(ETo)for both calculations shall be consistent.The - - evapotranspiration rate(ETo)Will be derived from current reference data,such as from the California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS) or other equivalent data, as determined by the Planning Director. 17.82-2 Item F-77 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article V, Chapter 17.104 Chapter 17.104 Temporary Uses Sections: Section 17.104.010 Purpose..........................................................................................17.104-1 Section 17.104.020 Permit Requirements and Exemptions............................................17.104-1 Section 17.104.030 General Development Standards for Temporary Uses....................17.104-2 Section 17.104.040 Standards for Specific Temporary Uses..........................................17.104-3 Section 17.104.010 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to establish development standards for temporary activities and land uses to ensure the overall health,safety,and general welfare of the community is maintained. Section 17.104.020 Permit Requirements and Exemptions Uses of property (including land, buildings, and structures) and activities that are temporary in nature shall comply with the permit requirements described below.The process for application for and review and issuance of a Temporary Use Permit shall be as described in Section 17.16.070 (Temporary Use Permit). A. Temporary Use Permit Required. The following temporary activities and uses may be allowed, subject to the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit prior to the • commencement of the activity or use and subject to the requirements within this Section. 1. Construction yards, storage sheds, and construction offices (off-site) in conjunction with an approved construction project, where the yard is located on a site different from the site of the approved construction project. 2. Entertainment and assembly events, including carnivals, circuses, concerts, fairs, festivals, food events, fundraisers, haunted houses, outdoor entertainment/sporting events, and similar events designed to attract large crowds and that are held either on private or public property when not otherwise part of or consistent with a permitted use(e.g., race at a raceway). 3. Farmers markets, as defined in this Title, held on public or private property. 4. Swap meets, as defined in this Chapter, including flea markets, rummage sales, and similar events held on public or private property. 5. Seasonal sales as defined in this Chapter (e.g., Halloween, Christmas), including temporary residence/security trailers. 6. Temporary sales offices as defined in this Title. 7. Fruit and vegetable stands(related to on-site business): ` 8. Outdoor display of merchandise as accessory to current on-site business. • 17.104-1 Item F-78 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article V, Chapter 17.104 Standards for height, off-street parking, setbacks, and other structure and property development standard that apply to the category of use or the zoning district of the subject parcel shall apply to all temporary activities. Section 17.104.040 Standards for Specific Temporary Uses The following standards shall apply to the specific temporary uses described below. A. Temporary Office Modules. 1. A master plan for development of permanent buildings shall be submitted in conjunction with such request. 2. The design of the office modules shall have a look of permanence,as much as practicable. This shall include such actions as screening temporary foundations, screening utility equipment,and using overhangs,walkways,and stepped roofs to mitigate the temporary appearance. 3. The approval of temporary office modules shall require necessary street improvements,grading,drainage facilities, and landscaping. fellaWnq limitations. 4. FFuit and vegetable stands (F81ated 46 GA site busine 3. Gutd99F FeGF9afiGR uses. sifestG 6-B. Parking Lot and Sidewalk Sales. Parking lot and sidewalk sales may be permitted on private property in the commercial/retail-areas of the city, including retail/wholesale businesses located in industrial areas, in connection with current on-site businesses, subject to the approval of a Temporary Use Permit as provided in Section 17.16.070 (Temporary Use Permits)and the following criteria: 1. Each sale is limited to a minimum of three (3) consecutive days, with a maximum of nineteen (19) days per calendar year. unless authorized by a Conditional Use Permit.: 2. No sale for any single business or any other businesses located on the same - lot or,parcel; or within a shopping center, shall be permitted within thirty 130Y days of another sale. 17.104-3 Item F-79 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article VII,Chapter 17.122 Chapter 17.122 Design Provisions by Development Type Sections: Section 17.122.010 Residential Development................................................................17.122-1 . Section 17.122.020 Hillside Development......................................................................17.122-9 Section 17.122.030 Commercial, Office, and Industrial Development...........................17.122-32 Section 17.122.040 Foothill Boulevard.........................................................................17.122-35 Section 17.122.050 Haven Avenue ..............................................................................17.122-53 Section17.122.060 Signs.............................................................................................17.122-58 Section 17.122.010 Residential Development The design standards and guidelines contained in this Section are supplemental to Chapter 17.120(General Design Provisions). A. Single-Family Home Designs. Placement of houses in single-family subdivisions is an important element in creating a functional, quality living environment.Single-family residential development should promote an attractive streetscape through architectural and site planning design elements that create variety and interest. Housing tracts characterized by repetitious street scenes of nearly identical two-story houses built at the minimum setback lines are not desirable. Generally, it requires the use of a combination of design concept solutions to achieve the goal of creating varied, interesting, and attractive streetscapes. • 1. Standards. a. At least twenty-five percent(25%)of all single-family detached units in any single-family residential development in a Residential Development District consisting of four(4)or more units should be single-story units. The number of single-story units may be reduced on a case-by-case basis when needed to serve the purposes of the Development Code and when justified by such considerations as location, lot size, and topography. b. Provide extra-deep setbacks for two-story houses on comer lots. C. Provide larger side yard setback (e.g., ten to twelve feet (10-12') minimum) on garage side of lot to allow vehicular access to the rear yard. d. Locate driveways as far as possible from intersections. e. Substantially vary front yard setbacks. f. Vary garage treatments such as detached and semi-detached,side and rear entries, etc. g. On flag lots, use twelve-foot(12')width for that portion of the driveway providing access to the garage to minimize concrete and maximize landscaping potential. 17.122-1 Item F-80 Article VII,Chapter 17.122 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code shall be designated as common open space rather than private open space. vi. Fuel modification areas shall also incorporate soil erosion and sediment control measures to alleviate permanent scarring and accelerated erosion. C. The Fire Chief may require brush,vegetation,or debris to be removed and cleared on each side of every roadway and access drive in accordance with the Municipal Code and Fire' District codes and standards, and may enter upon private property to do so.This Section shall not apply to single specimens of trees, ornamental shrubbery, or cultivated ground cover such as green grass, ivy, succulents,or similar plants used as ground covers, provided they conform to Fire District codes and standards. As used in this Section, "roadway" means that portion of a highway or private street improved or ordinarily used for vehicular travel. d. If the Fire Chief determines in any specific case that difficult terrain, danger of erosion, or other unusual circumstances make strict compliance with the clearance of vegetation undesirable or impractical, he may suspend enforcement thereof and require reasonable alternative measures designed to advance the purposes of this article. e. Restrict structures and facilities from geologically hazardous areas. f. Require special construction features in the design of structures where site investigations confirm potential geologic hazards. g. The Friant Escondido and Ramona/Arlington soil associations are not suitable for on-site wastewater disposal. Development not on public sewers within areas generally defined as being either of these associations shall be permitted only after site-speck investigations have been conducted that demonstrate the soils are suitable and the disposal of wastewater will not degrade the subsurface water quality. h. The Tujunga-Delhi soil association may have soil-bearing capabilities that could limit some development. Structures proposed on this soil type should be permitted only after a site-specific investigation has been performed that indicates the soils can adequately support the weight of the structure. L For all development within the Alquist-Priolo or City-adopted "Special Study Zone,"a statement shall be included on every deed,for each lot or parcel, which informs the prospective owner of the potential for seismic activity and the potential hazard. Secti6h 17.122.030 CdMmercial, Office, and Industria( Deve"lopinent ` 17.122-32 Item F-81 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article VII,Chapter 17.122 • The majority of design standards and guidelines for commercial, office, and industrial development are provided in Chapter 17.120(General Design Provisions). This Section contains only those provisions that are unique to commercial, office, and/or industrial development. A. Special Site Design Provisions. 1. Standards. a. Provide employee break areas for office and industrial projects, and provide plazas where employees can rest and eat lunch, preferably away from.public entrances to buildings, loading areas, or other high- traffic areas. Provide tables and/or benches, and shade trees and/or shade structures. Break areas shall be designed and sized to comfortably accommodate furniture and amenities, should have a minimum size of five hundred(500)square feet and have seating for at least ten percent(10%)of the anticipated workforce. b. Screen drive-through lanes from public view by orienting the building and a combination of landscaping, berming, and low screen walls. C. For shopping centers, vending machines and newspaper racks are to be recessed into the building fagade. d. Completely screen long-term shopping cart storage. • 2. Guidelines. a. For commercial projects, give special attention to creating pedestrian scale and an inviting place for pedestrians to shop. b. Site amenities, such as walls, hardscape, street furniture, trash enclosures, lighting, and monument signs, should be designed as part of the total architectural package for the project. C. Integrate signs into the architectural program. B. Parking Areas.The following standards and guidelines apply: 1. Standards. a. Screen parking areas from public view with mounding,landscaping,low walls, grade differentials, and building orientation. b. For parking areas, include one(1)tree for every three(3)parking stalls for shade. 2. Guidelines. a. Distribute parking evenly throughout a site instead of concentrating all in one large parking lot. • 17.122-33 Item F-82 Article VII,Chapter 17.122 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code b. Consider the types of users desired and plan the project accordingly rather than trying to maximize building floor area. C. Parking areas should not be the dominant element in the overall design of a project and should be designed to minimize visual disruption. e-d. The design of parking areas:should also minimize auto noise, light and glare,and ambient air temperature.This can be accomplished through the use of sound walls, general location, use of well-designed lights, and landscaping throughout the parking lot. s� �. 9ta F;daFdc. a. Twenty r er-GeRt(29,Fe0 &C. Pedestrian Orientation. 1. Guidelines. a. Colonnades or loggias and other covered walkways or structures that provide shade to pedestrian spaces shall be utilized whenever possible. b. At street level, the use of building materials and building details that relate to human activity shall be required where appropriate. C. Convenient pedestrian circulation shall be provided throughout all projects to connect public streets, parking areas, and public transit facilities with buildings and pedestrian open spaces. d. Open spaces shall be integrated with pedestrian walks and defined by landscaping and other elements to create a sense of place. e. Where possible, open spaces shall be accessible to the public. f. Street Furniture. Benches, light standards, kiosks, drinking fountains, trash receptacles,and other street furniture in on-site open spaces shall be designed in a coordinated fashion to enhance the appearance and function of the site and open space. g. Pedestrian areas shall be highly visible and well lit. D. Special Architectural Provisions. 1. Standards. 17.122-34 Item F-83 ST AFF REPORT PLV*RQNGDEPAIrrMENr Date: May 28, 2014 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19505 - ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC - A request to subdivide a 0.29 acre parcel into two lots for a site located on the northeast comer of 24th Street and Center Avenue in the Low (L) Residential Development District; APN: 0209-122-01. Related File: Variance DRC2014-00112. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2014-00112 - ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC - A request for a Variance to reduce the minimum net average lot size in connection with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 located on the northeast comer of 24th Street and Center Avenue in the Low (L) • Residential Development District-APN: 0209-122-01. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-family residential; Low Residential (L) District South - Single-family residential; Low Residential (L) District East - Single-family residential; Low Residential (L) District West - Single-family residential; Low Residential (L) District B. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Low (L) Residential (2-4 du/ac) North - Low(L) Residential (2-4 du/ac) South - Low(L) Residential (2-4 du/ac) East - Low(L) Residential (2-4 du/ac) West - Low(L) Residential (2-4 du/ac) C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a rectangular-shaped vacant corner parcel with an overall area of about 0.29 acres. The site is approximately 100 feet deep (north to south) and approximately 125 feet wide (east to west). The project site is currently vacant with an approved entitlement for the construction of a single-family residence. The surrounding land uses to the north, east, south and west are all single-family residential. Street frontage will be along 24th Street. The zoning for the project site and surrounding areas is Low (L) Residential (2 -4 du/ac). There is an alley just east of the project site. Item G_H1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19505- ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to split the existing parcel into two. The proposed subdivision does not meet the minimum net average for parcel area (8,000 square feet) nor the minimum lot size (7,200 square feet). However, the property has gained extra real estate because of a vacation of the alley (10 feet) just east of the project site and a vacation along 24th Street (10 feet) and Center Avenue (7 feet). With the vacations, the parcel (prior to subdividing) will be approximately 110 feet deep (north to south) and approximately 142 feet wide (east to west); this will increase the parcel size to approximately 15,547 square feet total (approximately 0.35 acre). The vacations for the alley and both streets were recorded on April 15, 2014. With the property vacations, the proposed subdivision meets the minimum lot size but still does not meet the minimum net average for the parcel area. Therefore, a Variance is required for the minimum net average for the parcel area. B. Grading Technical. and Design Review Committees: The Committees reviewed the project on April 15, 2014. The Grading and Technical Review Committees recommended approval of the project without changes. The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the proposed variance and subdivision to be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. C. Environmental Assessment: This subdivision.would normally be categorically exempt through Section 15315 (Minor Land Divisions) because it is the proposed subdivision of four or fewer lots, but the inability to meet the minimum net average lot size requires a Variance. Therefore, the Categorical Exemption cannot be used, and a Negative Declaration was prepared. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (°CEQA°) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Negative'Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 and Variance DRC2014-00112 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Respectfully submitted, LA— Candyce urnett Planning Manager CB:MN/Is Item G.H2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19505 - ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC • May 28, 2014 Page 3 Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Exhibit C - Aerial Photo Exhibit D - Document 2014-0132961 -Alley Vacation Exhibit E - Document 2014-0132960 - Street Vacations Exhibit F - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2014-00112 • RPM l: W1 • • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SITE UTILIZATION MAP TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP#19505 t u ( E NEW ) .t TITto • ° I U — n ZONE IR to 'a as.H—At 20TN AVENU@\— ` u n OD NE� L M m ■ 9 e ° (2 NE W AC) e I e (ZO 2 DU/kC) I . ° e 22 m to to ' I • I x/ ! ! till to m i} i. } } \ EXISTING IBGAL DESCRIP190N t — — — — — — `' O15.-4 elpLf S4 IMM[LGW1atr rB N P.w]101-IJA01 26TH AVENUE au J.nr snerrr,°.a.o n,p°po, t} •} I1 1 EXISMG LEGAL DESCRIPTION b3i» }} S i! T 19 13 » 10 t• w4peQ w.Q.w®py lO.m mrO xw yfw 9 t] t5 t] Is }t 13 n 27a mrd°ti.�m[t9.ov er a e pZ1 e ( n!A•' »n » I1/1 e »( a m ..,s 1w » e]i• Wut1z>ey. — , — Z NE D AL P: (ZO E 2 AW ZONE IR. HAODa94 is io Z 24TH STREET i•a:•Ul�.uImUT.IoJE�a0�O S i) PS It 3 10 10 w®mw 1oai.^roaOsmem"mm�M' .rao�vnlor.o..Dwaa-snwrM a w.1.O o]._r.�n.wourxma r ]snnir.no°.rarm�w:.mw �. e° e \ e e �x � , am mores e•nar m 1 ( NE -4 /AC) a • ( LCO I r.vee rlsi eaira-ia: } ! i DU/h air ea �.wi Mb to » » xJ » ye to • I • qq°}®per _ _ — — } — } t• / — � — smr wwnr gym.. ® — _ PARCEL ARRA SUMMARY — ZONE GI — — I —I.—m n ZONE GI e}.•er.a°. n.en 1.,,saa m a _ ee — — — — neamner•. SLTE UTILIZATION MAP a u.' IN12241NSINEEI RANMOXVWWA UNDLRDRDUND SERVA:E A18RE °E`"S� _ Bl l or.r wu ow.,v.or tx 4ea• ,��isn c�.an eaa. .y n°n•� 9m rant a lmt rxoNe:INq}xt-mJ/ no aOml6 OnS ar,eC a m SWC ItiF MlF1 UrM Sta[l�a ".N.N9.122-01 1 SN[tf5 • • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #19505 '• 6 1 THE C/TYOF RANCHO CUCAMONCANl5 I sAvsE BL CK f 8 x ; P or - � Z YY � — I �• I �PA{f(tacrH�xr 5 — —. /v/s (W �.. 7.00 (n89'S07V 125) — — —,—•—• 10.00 5C4:ry-la � lo.00 X2.00 Rmf r� , T8• 7• " N 10• sr. W I rO -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 7z• 14 w 0 IA �{/'►�y#' PARCEL 2 PROPOSED • -J�r�[ �1lVJJL� ' HOVSE CURRENT AREA SUMMARY PARCEL AREA SUMMARY Qy' vmil cNJS- Zci3 ma-usomn ._,.a,mn W o W_ 3 ,.nomas a W UTILITIES IMPROVEMENT CERTIFICATE U — — — — � — — — — — — — — — — — — _ _ ��®QW r,rypVwnM�P9nw,Mr[r>MmOiev� , a®.r..�.wre. rwr.mmw rat wr mmmt nr+ ,� I � �m u:w+w am wr,a rra e m woon.uf'�r,®.o.a V ORIGINAL FLIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED 0'VACATION ®e s•arev •� VACATION 13.00 PROPOD RIGHT OWAY N a p° •n 4RC o J2' H.'7'YA'�aY lawn �! '.DaXwne I n QIRvsroR•s STATEMENT 'co 24TH STREET _ 175.00 r`ar1O N69.11.06'V 659.00 (Na9'50'V 660) I ENV/RONMENTAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION T;ZATIVE PARML MAP#19505 HIC(1TEL^N ;�,Aa was s w.w«a.nc...r. ENClNEER/NG ++rw vvc wwr ae.oc. SURVEYORS NOTES mwsnars sxm T a �� ,°,year m.wn.rrwo.,.wrr aaa raw socv comms m w•e.r..woe ww m.w+n•w a a.+.arr srm Donor s,e mw•sorro cane sumrnaaa awr(c rm mmm e.rs toms an a aur cru 1 wuTs mem-mr tw.,-rn, .fimnommmrw mao.+awrw .a*axwuf�nr *• ,ter..°.a wwr a...-moo e e my wiae(sal u.-mm °O�'mw" sur[:r•�ro WR:10 t1 If u-ur aaoea Dao 1 IL IrI! ._ i lob 1 4 .� .ail}���- 11 )� �� �•� �_ �. � � R � k w• EXHIBIT Recorded in Official Records,County of San Bernardino 4115/2014 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: r DENNIS DRAEGER FV09 AM ASSESSOR - RECORDER - CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. O. Box 807 R Regular Mail Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Doc#: 2014—0132961 Tines: t Pages: 6 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Fees 0.00 Taxes 0.00 CITY CLERK Omer 0.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAID P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Govt.Cod.Sec.27383 RESOLUTION NO. 14-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE SUMMARILY VACATION OF 20-FOOT WIDE NORTH-SOUTH BOUND ALLEY LOCATED EAST OF CENTER AVENUE BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 251h STREET V-223 - APN 209-122-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 23, 24 RELATED FILE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PARCEL MAP 19505 • Title of Document EXHIBIT D i RESOLUTION NO. 14-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE SUMMARILY VACATION OF 20-FOOT WIDE NORTH-SOUTH BOUND ALLEY LOCATED EAST OF CENTER AVENUE; BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 251th STREET V-223-APN 209-122-01, 02,03,04, 05, 23, 24 RELATED FILE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PARCEL. MAP 19505 WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8334, of the Streets and Highway Code,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate those portions of the City Streets hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City'of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission on February 12, 2014, by minute action finds and determines that the summary vacation of the subject alley herein contemplated conform to the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS,the City Council found all the evidence submitted that the subject alley located east of Center Avenue between 24th Street and 25th Street is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes because it is not required for street or highway purposes. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating the alley (V-223), on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,which have been further described in the legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit"A"and shown on Exhibit"B" and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said alley no longer constitutes a public easement. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. Resolution No. 14-059-Page 1 of 2 Rpm GHR PASSED, APPROVED,AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of April 2014. AYES: Alexander, Michael, Spagnolo, Steinorth, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None L. ennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: • ice C. Reynolds, City rk 1, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 2"d day of April 2014. Executed this 3rd day of April 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. J ce C. Reynolds, Ci Clerk Resolution No. 14-059- Page 2 of 2 Itpm f: HQ i 2014'AII Capacity Acknowledgment STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) CIVIL CODE, SECTION 1181, 11-84) i On April 2, 2014, before me, .Adrian Garcia, CMC, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, personally appeared L. Dennis Michael, Mayor of the City" of Rancho Cucamonga, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Officer Adrian Garcia, CIVIC Assistant City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga Item G_H10 • EXHIBIT "A4:9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (ALLEY VACATION) A PORTION OF BLOCK 58 IN THE NORTH CUCAMONGA TRACT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AS SHOWN ON NIAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4 PAGE 8 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COLrNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT l OF SAID BLOCK 58.SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE.POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 00°23'-58"EAST. A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12 OF SAID BLOCK: THENCE SOUTH 89011'06"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 13 OF SAID BLOCK: THENCE SOUTH 00°-7-5S" WEST.. A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH-WEST CORNER OF LOT 14 OF SAID BLOCK: THENCE NORTH 89°11'06"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B"ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART THERE OF. NK.LAivo �sT PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION F: DOF Ch�t ATEE� PAUL Cm OPHER E P.L.S. 5380 EXPIltES 12/31/3015 File No: 13-131 ]anuary 2014 EXHIBIT 99B91 ®—ALLEY AREA TO BE VACATED 25TH STREET 0 scn,.e I"-5o (N89.50'W 125) 20.00 (50) cu 12 'r' fu 40' 11 20' 10 — — — — — n 13 15 to I 9 W 8 z - .- - - - o w W a to a' 6 BLOCK 58 d N cu E z w 5 I v 4 — — — 14 16 I 3 - - - - - LAND 2G1S70P/�r 40' 20 6-0 ITRUE Inn POINT On l S 52�"•/,� I w 1 OF BEGINNING (125) 20.00. (50) ctr �q 9Tf OF 24TH STREET N89'11'06'W 659.00 (N89.50'W 660) ENVIRONMENTAL PREPARED BY: HIGHT.ECH PAUL CHRISTOPHER EHE LS. 5280 ENGINEERING IN JANUARY OF 20 • LAND SURVEYING • LAND PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING (909) 886-1811 FAX (909) 883-1297 SIGNED 3272 N. "E" St. #A. San Bemardino. CA 92405 P.L.S. NO. 5186 -EXf.1 2/31/2015 EHE# 13-131 JANUARY OF 2014 Item (; H 12 ff Recorded In Ofllclal Records,County of San Bernardino 4/15/2014 DENNIS DRAEGER FV A" • RECORDING REQUESTED BY: ° ASSESSOR - RECORDER - CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA R Regular Mail P. O. Box 807 Titles: 1 Pages: 6 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Doc#: 2014-0132960 fags e.ee WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Taxese.e6 Other 0.0e CITY CLERK PAID 80.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Govt.Cod.Sec.27383 RESOLUTION NO. 14-058 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHTS-OF-WAY INCLUDING A 7-FOOT WIDTH ON THE EAST SIDE OF CENTER AVENUE BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET, A 10-FOOT WIDTH ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET FROM CENTER AVENUE TO 240 FEET EAST AND A 10-FOOT WIDTH ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 25TH STREET FROM CENTER AVENUE TO 240 FEET EAST (V-222) - APN 209-122-01, 02, 03, 04,05, 22, 23,24 Title of Document • EXHIBIT E RESOLUTION NO. 14-058 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHTS-OF-WAY INCLUDING A 7-FOOT WIDTH ON THE EAST SIDE OF CENTER AVENUE BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET, A 10-FOOT WIDTH ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET FROM CENTER AVENUE TO 240 FEET EAST AND A 10-FOOT WIDTH ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 25TH STREET FROM CENTER AVENUE TO 240 FEET EAST(V-222)-APN 209-122,01, 02,03, 04,05,22,23, 24 WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8334, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate those portions of the City Streets hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission on February 12, 2014, by minute action found and determined that the summary vacation of the subject rights-of-way herein contemplated conform to the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that the subject rights-of-way located on the east side of Center Avenue between 24th Street and 25th Street, on the north side of 24th Street from Center Avenue to 240 feet east, and on the south side of 25th Street from Center Avenue to 240 feet east, are unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating the excess street rights-of-way, as shown on map V-222, on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which have been further described in the legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit"A" and shown on Exhibit"B" and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 3: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said excess street rights-of-way no longer constitute a street or public easement. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. Resolution No. 14-058-Page 1 of 2 Item G_H14 ® PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of April 2014. AYES: Alexander, Michael, Spagnolo, Steinorth, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None 4L. nis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: 71• ce C. Reynolds, City Cl k I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on-the 2nd day of April 2014. Executed this 3rd day of April 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. 66C." Reynolds, C Clerk Resolution No. 14-058 - Page 2 of 2 Item G H 15 2014 All Capacity Acknowledgment STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) CIVIL CODE, SECTION 1181, 1184) On April 2, 2014, before me, Adrian Garcia, CMC, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, personally appeared L. Dennis Michael, Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized . capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Officer Adrian Garcia, CMC 1 i Assistant City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga Item G.H 16 EMMIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION (ROAD VACATION) A PORTION OF BLOCK 58 IN THE NORTH CUCAMONGA TRACT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4 PAGE 8 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF SAID BLOCK 58, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING- THENCE NORTH 00°23'58" EAST, THENCE NORTH 89011'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 240.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44050'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 16.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00023'58" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 289.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44°30'27" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 16.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°11'06" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 240.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°23'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 16 OF SAID BLOCK; THENCE NORTH 89011'06"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 245.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF SAID BLOCK; THENCE NORTH 00°23'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 12 OF SAID BLOCK; THENCE SOUTH 89°11'06"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 245.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT`B"ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART THERE OF. • �7y oNF,L LAND �SJ��RtSTOpyF�G.pG�� PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISIO P. OF: a ZZ80, .* EL� * � s Z 9TFDF CAl DA PAUL CHRIST E P.L.S. 5280 EXPIRES 12/31/2015 File No: 13-131 7anuary 2014 is-- t+ u17 EXHIBIT "B." ® —ROAD AREA TO BE VACATED -77 N44.50'27'E 25TH STREET o 16.91\/ — 7.7-7 — — — — SCALE I"-50' I .. (N69'50'W 125) 20.00 (50) (50) Ln cu v - - 12cu 40' I 11 ��•tjo:,U• 20'- 416 6 1 10 — — — — — n 13 15 17 I 9 .. I _ ] 8 CD CD z — w �I 7 W � a I h H 6 BLoac ss N z Z FA I U I 5 4 I — — u, 14 16 18 3 33'--1 2 40' 20' cu 1 �' (125> 20.00 (50) -- — — — _li—z� N4416'27,W 24TH STREET b o N89.11'06'.W cN89•5g:w-� %. ENVIRONMENTAL ._.HIGHTECH PAUL CHRISTOPHER EHE LS 5280t 1 ENGINEERING IN JANUARY.OF 2014. �~y^�y ? I! ,j , Y`t� .Y� I)11 • LAND SURVEYING 1I°�. • LAND PLANNING cr !_. • CIVIL ENGINEERING f (909) BB6-1811 FAX (909) 883-1297 SIGNED: `•'� r - �..:;• ✓3272 N. 'E" SL #A, Son Bernardino, CA.92405 P.L.S. NO. 5280 EXP.12/31/2015. �� EHE# 13-131 JANUARY OF 2014 • ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) RANCHO (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) C,,[JCA1w9ONGA Planning DeperM—t (909)4774750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and.the development application, additional information such as,but not limited to;traffic,noise,biological,drainage,and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the initial Study Part II as required.by CEQX In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its.agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. GENERAL• O. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal,, City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Tentative Parcel Map 19505 P►aject Title: Tentative Parcel Map 19505 Name&Address of project owner(s): Royal Falcon Investment Company, LLC 2547 E.Walnut Creek,West Covina, CA 91791 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor. Same as above(note-this project is for lot sales) • Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT F Ram r^. 1-110 Contact Person&Address Environmental Hightech Engineering/P. Christopher Ehe, PLS 5280 3272 North"E"Street, Suite A, San Bernardino, CA 92405 (909)886-1811 Name&Address of person preparing this form(►f different from above): Same as above Telephone Number (909)886-1811 PROJECT • 'MA TION & I • Information indicated by an asterisk(')is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the probed site,and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north,south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): Northeast comer of 24th Street and Center Avenue 4) Assessor's Pace/Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 209-122-01 '5) Gross Site Area(ac/sq. 1t.): 0,%2 AX0s 24� Sap '6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed dedications): O 3014 Aarc5 / 19; r S 3'I SW 7) Desrxibe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the projed site (attach additional sheet if necessary): Separate applications to be submitted by subdivider for alley vacation and road right-of--way vacation to achieve minimum lot sizes updated 4/11201.3 Page 2 of 10 Item G H2n 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: . See question#7 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography,soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological and(or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys,traffic studies): Four vacant lots(MB 4/8) in an aged, existing subdivision with existing utilities and full improvements. No geologic or hydrologic features exist. No special studies are necessary. No existing structures on-site. • • Updated 4/11/2013 Page 3 of 10 i+mmr' uoI 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books published reports and oral history): None 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft roadway noise,eta)and how they will afTect proposed uses. None 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development the extent of development to occur with each phase,and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary. Need to record a 2-parcel parcel map for lot sales. 13) Describe the surrounding properties including information on plants and animals and any cultural,historical,or scenic aspects. Indicate the We of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops,department stores,etc.)and scale of development(height frontage,setback,rear yard,eta): Surrounding lots are existing 50-60 year old single family residences Page 4 of 10 Updated 4/11/2013 ROM r: W99 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale,or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No,full improvements already exist in the surrounding area 15) indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? None, not applicable as project is for lot sales only '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: None 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: None 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further dari6cation,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gaMday) NIA Peak use(gai/Day) NIA Mase-r--T is'oO'- b. CommerciaUlnd. (gal/day/ac) Peak use(ga#Min/ac) W;rT 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. 0 Septic Tank Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gaYday) b. Commercial4ndustrial(gaYday/ac) r Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units:2 Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes,minimum lot size and maximum lot size: None proposed-project is for lot sales Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): None proposed-project is for lot sales 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Unknown to $ Sale Prices) $ Rent(per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit We. Unknown-project is for lot sales 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit We Unknown-project is for lot sales 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment 8: a. Elementary.- b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major functions)of commercial,industrial or institutional uses: Not applicable Page 6 of 10 Updated 4/11/2013 14-am r_ W9A 26) Tota/floor area of commercial,industrial,or institutional uses by type: Not appicable 27) Indicate hours of operation: Not applicable 28) Number of employees: Total:Not applicable Maximum Shin: rime of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job dassifications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): Not applicable • 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City.Not applicable '31) For commercial and industrial uses only,indicate the source, type,and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District,at(818)572-6283): Not applicable ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. All utility services already exist in this established community • Updated 4/112013 Page 7 of 10 33) In the known history of this property,has there been any use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenaIs? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include,but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides and herbicides,fuels,oils,solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use,storage, and/or discharge on the property,as well as the dates of use,it (mown. None—area is clear of hazardous and toxic materials 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary orlong#erre use,storage,ordischarge of hazardous and/ortoxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses,along with the storage and shipment areas,shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees 35) apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing. I hereby certify that the statements fumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts statements,and information presented are true and cared tot.he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that ' nal information may be require be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucam ga. Date: l2 j 3 Signature: Title: �QQ��� �5 P ofe*x 7i�Tt Page 8 of 10 Updated 41112013 r ATTACHMENT 'A" • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit(tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit(tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit(tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit(tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit(tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit(tenant) Sewer Flows Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering& Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 9 of 10 14-- ,, f� u-37 • ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)967-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 Updated 4/112013 Page 10 of 10 linin I- W 9 R x t - s i ..Jw +�jS'�j\ 't Ny� J6 r4J W ` w �r ® City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART 11 BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 2. Related Files: Variance DRC2014-00112, Vacation SUBENGV223 3. Description of Project: A proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of about 0.29 acres into two lots located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue in the Low (L) Residential Development District -APN: 0209-122-01. Although this project is the subdivision of four or fewer lots and would normally be Categorically Exempt under Section 15315(Minor Land Divisions), as the proposed lots will not comply with the City's minimum net average for lot area, a variance is required. As a result, the project does not qualify for this Categorical Exemption. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the existing parcel into two (2) parcels. Currently, the proposed subdivision does not meet the minimum net average for parcel area (8,000 square feet). However, the property will gain extra real estate because of a pending vacation of the alley (10 feet)just east of the project site- and a proposed vacation along 24th Street(10 feet) and Center Avenue (7 feet). With the vacations, the parcel (prior to subdividing) will be approximately 110 • feet deep (north to south) and approximately 142 feet wide (east to west); this will increase the parcel size to approximately 15,547 square feet (total). With the property vacations, the proposed subdivision meets the minimum lot size but does not meet the minimum net average for the parcel area. Therefore, a Variance is required for the minimum net average for the parcel area. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Christopher Ehe 3272 North"E" Street, Suite A San Bernardino, CA 92405 5. General Plan Designation: Low Residential 6. Zoning: Low(L) Residential District(2-4 du/ac) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is a rectangular-shaped vacant corner parcel with an overall area of about 0.29 acres. The site is approximately 100 feet deep (north to south)and approximately 125 feet wide(east to west). The property will gain extra real estate due to a pending vacation of the alley just east of the project site and also a proposed vacation along 24th Street and Center Avenue. The lot will be approximately 110 feet deep (north to south) and approximately 142 feet wide (east to west) with the approval of the vacation, which will increase the lot size to about 0.36 acres total. The project site is currently vacant with an approved entitlement for the construction of a single-family residence. The surrounding land uses to the north, east, south and west are all single-family residential. Street frontage will be along 24th Street.The zoning for the project site and surrounding areas is Low(L)Residential(2-4 du/ac). 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 I+om r: 1-111 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 2 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mayuko Nakajima Assistant Planner (909)477-2750 x4307 10. Other agencies whose approval Is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation.agreement): None GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR—Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR-Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG—Reactive Organic Gases PM,o—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan CALEEMOD—California Emissions Estimator Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a „Potentially Sign n ” Significant Impact, Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( )Aesthetics ( )Agricultural Resources ( )Air Quality ( )Biological Resources ( )Cultural Resources ( )Geology&Soils ( )Greenhouse Gas Emissions ( ) Hazards&Waste Materials ( )Hydrology&Water Quality ( )Land Use&Planning ( )Mineral Resources ( )Noise ( )Population & Housing ( )Public Services ( )Recreation ( )Transportation/Traffic ( ) Utilities &Service Systems ( )Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (x) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DELLA ION will be epared. !,,! Prepared �'` / Date: Reviewed By: Date: � f Rev 2-26-13 Ram (. H19 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 3 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than pP 9 Significant Mtigafion SignlflcantNo Impact Inco orated Impact Im act EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north, south, east and west. There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is • not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State -Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. . C) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north, south, east and west. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to ensure compliance with the technical and design standards and policies established by the Planning Commission and City Council. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. d) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north, south, east and west. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review the design and placement of street lights will be required to comply with City standards including requirements for shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Residential lighting is generally not a source of substantial glare as such lighting is limited to within the confines of the home. Exterior residential lighting will be required to comply with City standards for maximum height and setbacks for light poles. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. • Rev 2-26-13 Ram r. uz1 Initial Study for City of Rancho.Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wtr, Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) ) (✓) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest () ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environmeJin ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could resultconversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The project site is located in an area developed with single-family residential uses. The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City.Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. i d) Refer to 2.c above. Rev 2-26-13 Item r: Had Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 . Page 5 i Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact e) Refer to 2.a and 2.c above. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? • Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The construction of homes is not part of this project. Although the project is for the future construction of two(2)single family homes, the site is located in a predominantly developed area and is not expected to interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP) as noted in the General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.3). Therefore, the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated.Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact b) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to ensure compliance with the applicable technical/design standards and policies to minimize impacts to air quality. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. C) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was • prepared and impacts evaluated. d) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Rev 2-26-13 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially wit, Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act Center Avenue. Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to,ensure compliance with the applicable technical/design standards and policies to minimize impacts to air quality. Therefore, the proposed 'subdivision will not have an impact. e) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to ensure compliance with the performance standards and policies that relate to odors that have been established by the Planning. Commission and City Council. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. .4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Rev 2-26-13 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 7 • Less Than IS, Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pote"fiantwith Than Significant Mitigationangnificant No Impact lincorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The project site is located in an area developed with single-family residential uses. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to ensure compliance with the applicable technical/design standards and policies to minimize impacts to biological resources. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. b) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. d) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and • Center Avenue. The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to ensure compliance with the applicable technical/design standards and policies to minimize impacts to biological resources. Therefore,the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. e) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. Although there are heritage trees on the project site, construction of homes is not proposed at this time. Any potential effects on heritage trees will be .evaluated when proposals are submitted to the City for review. A tree removal permit shall be required prior to removal of any heritage trees and appropriate mitigation shall be required. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. f) Neither the City nor the Sphere of Influence (SOI) are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project.- a) roject.a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in • § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? Rev 2-26-13 Ram r. uz7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast comer of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). Therefore,the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. b) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to determine whether they will have an impact on historical resources. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore,the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. C) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of-Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan. The construction of homes is not part of this project but.will be evaluated when proposals are submitted for review by the City. The developer of the homes will be required to comply with existing standards for reducing impacts to archeological resources. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less- than-significant impact.Therefore,the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. d) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast comer of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of surrounding developments. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section Rev 2-26-13 Item G_H38 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: SignMialiy wr�tn Than Sign cant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Impact 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) () ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? • iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () ( ) ( ) (✓) C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable'of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast comer of 24th Street and Center Avenue. No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to determine whether they will have an impact on historical resources. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure • a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. b) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Rev 2-26-13 Item I^ HIQ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g signficant bStlgatlon Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to determine whether they will be excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils that could result in, for example, substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. If there is an impact, mitigation measures will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact.Therefore,the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. C) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. d) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically stable. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. e) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The construction of homes is not part of this project but will be evaluated when proposals are submitted for review by the City to evaluate wastewater disposal. Sewer/septic options will be evaluated within the context of local, State, and federal regulations and guidelines. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel-powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation Rev 2-26-13 Ram r.Ndn Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Pay With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Im ad Impact including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cha, and N20. CHa is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. The construction of homes is not part of this project but will be evaluated when proposals are submitted for review by the City. The homes will be required to be consistent with the design/technical standards and policies established by the Planning Commission and City Council. The developer of the homes will be required to comply with existing standards for reducing greenhouse gases. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. b) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. No applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The construction of homes is not part of this project but will be evaluated when proposals are submitted for review by the City. The homes will be required to be consistent with the design/technical standards and policies established by the Planning Commission and City Council. The developer of the homes will be required to comply with existing standards for reducing greenhouse gases. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) () () (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the • environment? Rev 2-26-13 IL__ ^ 1 I I4 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g SignMieant ANtigatian Significant No Impact Incorporated Iact Impact e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2. miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) () (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The construction of homes is not part of this project; however, the residential uses that are anticipated for the site are not expected to have routine. transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Therefore,the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. C) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The nearest school, Rancho Cucamonga Middle School at 10022 Feron Boulevard, is about 1,400 feet(0.27-mile) to the west of the project site. There is no proposed construction at this time. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. d) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The project site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. e) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the Rev 2-26-13 I+nm r. W A9 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With ThanPP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact lincorporated I Impact Impact General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 2.28 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. However, construction is not proposed at this time. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. g) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to ensure compliance with public street access and comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances. Therefore, the • proposed subdivision will not have an impact. h) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City. The project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? • d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? Rev 2-26-13 Ram r: WAW Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: signhcand Mitigation Significant No Im act Inewporated Impact Impact e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) () ( ) (✓) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) () () (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant.risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche., tsunami,or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The construction of homes is not part of this project but will be evaluated when proposals are submitted for review by the City and will be required to connect to existing water and sewer systems. These homes will be evaluated when proposals are submitted for review by the City to determine the need for a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post- construction operational management of storm water runoff. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. b) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. According to the CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. The CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development Citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. The CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. C) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to determine impacts to absorption rates, drainage patterns, the rate and amount of surface water runoff, erosion, siltation, and alteration of any stream or river. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. d) Refer to 9.c above. e) Refer to 9.c above. Rev 2-26-13 14-a r P. I—Idd Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially with Than pp g Significant tu0tigafion Signifieant No , Impact Incorporated Irnoact Impact f) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to determine impacts to surface water quality caused by grading activities associated with the construction period that could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. g) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. h) Refer to 9.g above. i) Refer to 9.g above. D The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and • Center Avenue. There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) () ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north, south, east and west. The construction of homes is not part of this project but will be evaluated when • proposals are submitted for review by the City and will be required to be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north, south, east and west to ensure that they become a part of the larger community. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. Rev 2-26-13 Ram f^ "At; Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: S°te"fiant With Than PP g Significant IuStlgaUon Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The project site land use designation is Low Residential and the proposed subdivision is for the future use of residences. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to ensure consistency with the General Plan and any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. Therefore,the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. c) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast comer of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources. Therefore,the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the projecf: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral (.) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a. local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. b) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground bome vibration or ground bome noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Rev 2-26-13 Item G-1-146 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiallyignifnt Wath man Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) () (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to determine if there are any noise impacts. If there is an impact, mitigation measures • will be imposed to ensure a less-than-significant impact. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. b) Refer to 12.a above. C) Refer to 12.a above. d) Refer to 12.a above. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 2.28 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Rev 2-26-13 14— f� U A 7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUSTPM19505 Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Potentially w�a,. Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant AAGgafion SignificanttVo Impact Incorporated I act I act Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast comer of 24th Street and Center Avenue. Although the project is for the future construction of two (2) single family homes, the site is located in a predominantly developed area and is not expected to induce significant population growth. The project is consistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation. The density was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. b) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The project site is vacant and,therefore, when the property is developed, there will be no displacement of housing. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. C) The project is .only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site. is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The project site is vacant and, therefore, when the property is developed, there will be no displacement of people. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:.. a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? C) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. It would be served by Fire Station #4 at 11297 Jersey Boulevard that is located about 1.20 miles to the east of the project site. Although the project is for the future construction of two(2)single family homes, it is not expected.that the added homes would require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Therefore,the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. Rev 2-26-13 Ram r. WAR Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 19 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially tfti With Than Significant gation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. Although the project is for the future construction of two (2) single family homes, it is not expected that there will be a significant increase in calls for service. Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. Therefore,the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. C) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. When the property is developed, a standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. d) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The site is in a developed area,* currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Old Town Park at 10033 Feron Boulevard, is located • 1,560 feet (0.30-mile) to the west of the project site. Although the project is for the future construction of two(2)single family homes, it is not expected that the added homes would require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. When the property is developed, a standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. e) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast comer of 24th Street and Center Avenue. Although the project is for the future construction of two (2)single family homes, it is not expected that the added homes, it is expected that they will utilize existing public facilities and will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities, and will otherwise be consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Rev 2-26-13 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Signtficand Mitigation Significant No Imoact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Old Town Park at 10033 Feron Boulevard, is located 1,560 feet to the west of the project site. Although the project is for the future construction of two (2) single family homes, it is not expected that the added homes would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. When the property is developed, a standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. b) Refer to 15.a above. 16. TRANSPORTATIONMRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) V) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) V) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) V) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) V) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) V) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. Although the project is for the future construction of two (2) single family homes, it is not expected that there will be a significant increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Rev 2-26-13 t+arn r. wi;n Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiallyignifwin Than pp g Significant MGfigafion Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Impact Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. When the property is developed, the developer will be required to pay a transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit and provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. b) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. Although the project is for the future construction of two (2)single family homes, it is not expected that there will be significant impact to level of service standards on adjacent arterials. When the property is developed, the developer will be required to pay a transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit and provide street improvements(curb, gutter, and sidewalk)along the street frontage of the site. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. C) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. Located approximately 2.28 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. • d) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to ensure that there is no substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature such as sharp curves or dangerous intersections, or incompatibility with other uses. . Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. e) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to ensure access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project is provided. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. f) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to ensure that they will not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation design. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Rev 2-26-13 Ram r' uKI Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Utigation Significant No Imoact Incorporated Impact Impact C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) V) project from existing entitlements and. resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) V) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) V) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) V) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The proposed project area is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. When the property is developed, the developer will be required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. b) Refer to 17.a above. C) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to ensure that all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. d) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The site is located on the northeast comer of 24th Street and Center Avenue. The project area is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve homes constructed in the future. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. Rev 2-26-13 [tom C;H59 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 23 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PaWith Than pp g Signifignlfieant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Refer to 17.a above. f) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. g) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to ensure that they will comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or • wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The project is only for the subdivision ,of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. Although the project is for the future construction of two (2) single family homes, it is not expected that the added homes will impact sensitive biological resources as the site is not located in an area of such resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. • b) The project is only for the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review the developer will be required to develop Rev 2-26-13 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Page 24 thesite in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use.projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) The project is only for .the subdivision of a parcel of 0.29-acre into two (2) lots for residential purposes. Subdivision of the property would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The construction of homes is not part of this project; when proposals are submitted to the City for review they will be evaluated to ensure there is no impact on, for example, air quality, biological resources, and traffic. Mitigation measures, if necessary, will be required to reduce impacts to less- than-significant levels. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will not have an impact. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive(check all that apply): (X) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (X) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (X) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) Rev 2-26-13 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parol Map SUBTPM19505 Page 25 • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this initial Study. I acknowledge that 1 have read this initial Study and the proposed mitigation.measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: Date: Print Name and Title: • Rev 2-26-13 Item G, H 55 - Y City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 Public Review Period Closes: May 28, 2014 Project Name: Project Applicant: Christopher Ehe 3272 North "E" Street, Suite A San Bernardino, CA 92405 Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue within the Low(L) Residential Development District-APN: 0209-122-01. Related Files: Variance DRC2014-00112 and Vacation "SUBENGV223. Project Description: A proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of about 0.29 acres into two lots located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue in the Low (L) Residential Development District-APN: 0209-122-01.Although this project is the subdivision of four or fewer lots and would normally be Categorically Exempt under Section 15315 (Minor Land Divisions), as the proposed lots will not comply with the City's minimum net average for lot area, a variance is required. As a result, the project does not qualify for this Categorical Exemption. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study indicates that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive(909)477-2750 or Fax(909)477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. May 28 2014 Date of Determination Adopted By Item r. H5R RESOLUTION NO. 14-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19505, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A PARCEL OF ABOUT 15,547 SQUARE FEET(0.35 ACRE) IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL(L)DISTRICT LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 24TH STREET AND CENTER AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: APN: 0209-122-01. A. Recitals. 1. Christopher Ehe, on behalf of Royal Falcon Investment Company, LLC,filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of May 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. . Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 28, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the site located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue in the Low(L) Residential Development District; APN: 0209-122-01; b. The parcel (prior to subdividing) is approximately 110 feet deep (north to south) and approximately 142 feet wide (east to west); the parcel size is approximately 15,547 square feet(total 0.35 acre); C. The zoning of the project site and the properties in all directions is Low Residential (L) District; d. The application contemplates the subdivision of the subject parcel into two (2) parcels for residential purposes. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed subdivision is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed project is to subdivide the property, into two(2) parcels for residential purposes—no development of the site is proposed at this time. The underlying General Plan designation is Low Residential. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-16 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19505 - ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 2 b. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare,or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed project is to subdivide the property, into two (2) parcels for residential purposes—no development of the site is proposed at this time. C. The proposed subdivision does not meet the minimum net average for the parcel area. Therefore a Variance is required for the subdivision to comply with the applicable provisions of the Development Code. With the exception of the minimum net average for the parcel area, the proposed subdivision meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the technical and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines,City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination,a Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of a parcel of about 15,547 square feet (0.35 acre)that is currently vacant, located at the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue in the Low(L)Residential Development District;APN:0209-122- 01. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations,.Uniform Building Code,or any other City Ordinances. 3) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall submit to the City applicable recorded documentation that establishes, and/or ensures the continuation of, agreements, easements, etc. for the purpose of mutual/reciprocal use, access, parking, and maintenance. Statements noting these agreements, easements, etc. shall be included on the Final Map. 4) Any proposals for development within the project site shall require the review and approval of the City's Planning Department prior to construction and/or installation. En4ineerina Department 1) Provide an Improvement Certificate on the final map requiring the installation of public improvements with each parcel. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-16 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19505 - ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 3 2) Center Avenue improvements to be in accordance with City"Local"standards as required and including: a. Protect or replace existing curb and gutter, driveway and sidewalk as required b. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required C. Replace existing street light on a wooden.pole with concrete street light pole 3) 24th Street improvements to be in accordance with City "Local" standards as required and including: a. Protect or replace existing curb and gutter, driveway and sidewalk as required b. Protect or replace existing signing and striping as required C. Provide one (1) 5800 Lumen HPSV street light on parcel 2 east property line on 24th Street 4) Vacate excess ROW of 7 feet on Center Ave and 10 feet on 24th Street. Process alley vacation for affected properties between 24th Street&25th Street. 5) Install drive approaches per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Per City standard 101. 6) Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid • and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. 7) A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be bome by the developer. 8) Development Impact Fees are currently under review by the City. Impact fees will be imposed as a required by city ordinance. Building and Safety Department (Grading) 1) Prior to issuance of a building permit or recordation of the Parcel Map, the applicant shall complete a non-priority water quality management plan with the Building and Safety Department. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mor" I' uGe PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-16 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19505 -ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 4 BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced., passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the : 28th day of May 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: I+am r, H60 I. _ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBTPM19505 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19505 APPLICANT: ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC LOCATION: Northeast comer of 24th Street and Center Avenue; APN: 0209-122-01 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: •A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, / its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Tentative Tract No. 19505 is granted subject to the approval of Variance DRC2014-00112. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 14-16, Standard / Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission hearing. a) Negative Declaration-$ 2,181.25 1 ROM r. WAI Project No. SUBTPM19505 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 5. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double /_/ wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 6. Construct block walls between homes(i.e., along interior side and rear property lines),rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). D. Building and Safety Single-Family Residential Standard Conditions 2 Itom f; HR9 Project No. SUBTPM19505 Completion Date • _/ General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan(when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan(when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer.or septic system location,fixture units, gas piping,and heating and air conditioning;and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and / a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. • 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the / applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. Construction activity shall occur in accordance with the standards as stated in Chapter 17.66.050 D-4 of the Development Code. New Structures / • 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive requirements. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3 u_.Y n inn Project No. SUBTPM19565 Completion Date 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind" instructions. 4. The home must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D. 5. Annexation of the parcel: Annexation of the parcel into the Community Facilities District#85- 1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or Building Permits. E. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The grading and drainage plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance.with the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or engineering geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. A separate Grading and Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from the Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on- site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owners to construct walls on property lines or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed off-set from the property line. 11. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot off-set from the public right-of-way or adjacent private property. 12. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 4 ��e..,r_ Wad Project No. SUBTPM19505 Completion Date 13. The precise Grading and Drainage Plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit." THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-0f--way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.)shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-0f--way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 66' total feet on Center Ave (excess ROW of T to be vacated:see file V-222) 60' total feet on 24th (excess ROW of 10'to be vacated:see file V-222) 60' total feet on 25th (excess ROW of 10'to be vacated:see file V-222) G. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, / landscaped areas,etc.)shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, • AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a / source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable,safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Center Avenue (a) 24"'Street X Notes: (a) Replace existing street light on wooden pole with concrete street light pole. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d)If so marked,an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. 5 14— f� ucc Project No. SUBTPM19505 Completion Date H. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. I. Improvement Completion 1. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel �— map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final parcel map, stating that they will be completed upon development for: Parcel 1, replace the existing street light on wooden pole with a concrete street light pole. For parcel 2,provide one(1)5800 lumen HPSV street light on parcel 2,east property line on 24'"Street. J. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV(all underground)in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. �— 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the �— Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD);Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. K. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to . Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT,'FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909)477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes,the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance,procedures &standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at www.citvofrc.us. L. Single-Family Residential Standard Conditions FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is calculated in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement;is made in accordance with current edition of the California Fire, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinance. 2. On the Site Plan to be submitted for review,-show all fire hydrants,located-within the-vicinity of the proposed project site. Please complete the following prior to the Issuance of any Building Permits: 1. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible I I_ for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 6 Project No. SUBTPM19505 Completion Date • 2. Automatic fire sprinklers: The structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with the current edition of the California Residential Code. 3. Address: Note on the plans that prior to the granting of occupancy,single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. • 7 14--... nuc7 • RESOLUTION NO. 14-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. DRC2014-00112 TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM NET AVERAGE LOT SIZE IN CONNECTION WITH TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19505 LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 24TH STREET AND CENTER AVENUE IN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0209-122-01. A. Recitals. 1. Christopher Ehe, on behalf of Royal Falcon Investment Company, LLC, filed an application for the issuance of Variance No. DRC2014-00112 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of May 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing • on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on May 28, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue with a street frontage of approximately 142 feet and lot depth of approximately 110 feet and is presently vacant land; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is single-family residential,the property to the south consists of single-family residential,the property to the east is single-family residential, and the property to the west is also single-family residential; and C. The project includes the concurrent submittal of Tentative Parcel Map • SUBTPM19505, which proposes the subdivision of the subject parcel into two (2) parcels for residential purposes; and ROM r, W A R PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-17 VARIANCE DRC2014-00112—ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 2 . 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code, in that both parcels meet the requirements of the Development Code for minimum lot area. The lots (7,627 square feet and 7,920 square feet)will be just short a few square feet in meeting the minimum net average for parcel area which is 8,000 square feet. b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district as the proposed lots are consistent with the smaller lots generally seen in the neighborhood. C. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district as the lots proposed are larger than most lots in the vicinity. With the exception of meeting the minimum net average for parcel area,the proposed subdivision was designed to meet all applicable development standards of the Development Code. d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district in that the lots will have to meet all applicable Development Code requirements such as lot width, depth, and any future proposed development of the site will be subject to the setback requirements and lot coverage. The size and configuration of the lots are consistent with the neighborhood. e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health,safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as it will only reduce the minimum net average for two parcels and all other Development Code requirements will still have to be adhered to. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA')and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City'staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study,City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, i+om C: wAQ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-17 VARIANCE DRC2014-00112— ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC May 28, 2014 • Page 3 finds: (i)that the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA;and (ii)that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Negative Declaration. C. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planninq Department 1) Approval of Variance DRC2014-00112 is for the reduction of the minimum net average for parcel area from 8,000 square feet to 7,627 square feet, in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505. 2) Approval of the Variance is contingent on the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 by the Planning Commission. 3) The subdivision will be developed in accordance with the plans on-file in the Planning Department,as approved by the Planning Commission. 4) Future house product for the subdivision shall adhere to the requirements of the Development Code. 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers,or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6) Prior to any use of the project site, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 7) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Ram r. urn PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-17 VARIANCE DRC2014-00112—ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced.,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of May 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Rpm GH71 STAFF REPORT • PL.-kNNING DEPARTMENT DATE: May 28; 2014RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19518 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC -A proposal to subdivide a property comprised of nine (9) parcels with a combined area of about 375,000 square feet (8.61 acres) into three (3) parcels in conjunction with the modification of a previously approved industrial/warehouse complex comprised in the General Industrial (GI) District located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151- 39 and -41 through -48. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-01118, Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01118 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC - A review of proposed modifications to a previously approved industrial/warehouse complex and architectural review of three (3) buildings on a property of about 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) in the General Industrial (GI) District located about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street; APNs: 0209-151-38 through -48. Related files: Development Review DRC20070-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-01120. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT DRC2013-01120 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC - A modification of Uniform Sign Program #221 for a partially constructed industrial/warehouse complex on a property of 20.7 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-38 through -48. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-0118, Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Minor Exception DRC2008- 00152. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission 1) adopt an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts that was previously adopted by the Planning Commission on November 10, 2010, and 2) approve Development Review DRC2013- 01118, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518 and Uniform Sign Program Amendment DRC2013- 01120 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of approval with conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Rancho Cucamonga City Yard and Industrial Buildings —General Industrial (GI) • District (Subarea 2) Item IJK1 I , PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-01118, DRC2013-01112 and SUBTPM19518— DCT 8T" &VINEYARD LLC May 28, 2014 Page 2 South - Single-Family Residences—City of Ontario East - (Part) Industrial Buildings—General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3) (Part) Condominiums—Low-Medium (LM) Residential District West - Single-Family Residences—City of Ontario B. General Plan Designations: Site - General Industrial and Low-Medium Residential . North - General Industrial South - Residential (City of Ontario) East - General Industrial and Low-Medium Residential West - Residential (City of Ontario) D. Site Characteristics: The project site is comprised of twelve (12) parcels, with a combined area of approximately 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres). The project site was originally triangular-shaped. The current configuration is a puzzle shaped parcel comprised of approximately 8.61 acres of vacant land and has street frontage on 8th Street of approximately 220 feet (east to west). At the widest point (middle of the site), the project spans approximately 584 feet and has frontage of approximately 260 feet (east to west) along 7th Street. The site measures approximately 1,650 feet measured north to south. The majority of the project site is located between 7th and 8th Streets. The remainder of the project site, approximately 38,952 square feet (0.89 acre) in area, is located on the south side of 7th Street. The property is bound on the south and west by the Cucamonga flood control channel, and beyond are single-family residences in the City of Ontario. To the east are industrial office/warehouse buildings and an operations facility for Verizon. To the north is property owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga where the.Public Works administration building and a household hazardous waste facility is located. To the southeast are additional residences. The zoning of the part of the property located between 7th and 8th Street is General Industrial (GI) District, while the zoning of the part of the property south of 7th Street is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north and east are General Industrial (GI) District and General Industrial (GI) District, respectively. The zoning of the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. E. Parking Calculations: The parking calculations for the proposed buildings is per Section 17.12.040(C)(1)(a) and (d) of the Development Code. Floor Area Parking Ratio Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Type of Use SF Required Provided Building A (Previous approval) Warehouse 127,204 varies* 52_ Office 2,500 1/250 10 Total 129,704 62 63 Item IJK2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-01118, DRC2013-01112 and SUBTPM19518 — DCT 8T" & VINEYARD LLC May 28, 2014 ® Page 3 Building B (Previous approval) Warehouse 1 94,859 1 varies* 1 44 Office/Mezzanine 6,500 1/250 26 Total 101,359 68 68 Building C Parcel 1 Warehouse 49,200 varies* 33 Office 6,250 1/2-50 25 Total 55,450 58 58 Building D Parcel 2 Warehouse 57,080 varies* 35 Office/Mezzanine 7,000 1/250 28 Total 64,080 63 64 Building E Parcel 3 Warehouse 35,730 varies* .28 Office 3,600 1/250 15 Total 39,330 43 44 Total Required 294 Total Provided 297 *1 per 1,000 sf for first 20,000 sf; 1 per 2,000 for the next 20,000 sf; and 1 per 4,000 sf for the remaining sf ANALYSIS: A. Background: Initially, the overall project site was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2010 (Related Files: Development Review DRC2007-00551 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794). The original approval was comprised of an industrial/warehouse complex on a property of about 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) that was comprised of twelve (12) buildings, ranging in floor area between 130,019 square feet (Buildings Al and A2) to 5,342 square feet (Building L), with a combined floor area of 389,600 square feet and a subdivision of the property into twelve (12) parcels. The applicant constructed (2) buildings — Buildings A1/ A2, and B — and associated improvements, but left • the remainder of the project site undeveloped. Item IJK3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-01118, DRC2013-01112 and SUBTPM19518— DCT 8T" &VINEYARD LLC May 28, 2014 Page 4 B. Proposed Design: The applicant submitted a request to modify the previously approved Development Review application by deleting nine (9) of the buildings from the proposal and replacing them with three (3) larger industrial/warehouse buildings. The proposed buildings have floor areas ranging between 37,530 square feet to 60,580 square feet. In conjunction with this revision, the applicant is consolidating nine (9) of the twelve (12) parcels that comprise the complex into three (3) parcels (Parcels 1, 2, and 3) that will correspond with each of the proposed buildings (Buildings C, D, and E). The redesign of the complex will result in three (3) buildings that, when combined with the previously constructed buildings, will have overall floor area of 389,923 square feet— an increase of 323 square feet from the original combined floor area of 389,600 square feet. The architecture of the proposed buildings. is consistent with the architecture of the previously approved buildings. The most significant changes are the footprint and the larger size of each building. Two buildings were constructed consistent with the previously approved plan. The basic layout of each building will be typical for warehouse buildings. All of the buildings will have dedicated docks for loading/unloading. All of the buildings will have their respective offices and entrances along the central drive aisle. The loading/unloading areas will be screened from public view by walls and/or the building. Parking for employees and visitors will be generally arranged along the central drive aisle and near the office entrances. The combined required parking is 294 stalls; 297 parking stalls will be provided. The combined required trailer storage/parking is 41 stalls. The applicant is providing 34 stalls, which is an eighteen (18) percent reduction from what was allowed with the previous approval of Minor Exception (DRC2008-00152). Landscape coverage is 12.8 percent; the minimum requirement for this Development District is 12 percent. The proposed buildings will be of concrete tilt-up construction. Each building will be painted with a palette of three colors; there will be some variation so that the each building will be painted a different set of three colors. The boldest or darkest of the three colors (that will comprise each palette) will be at the general area around the offices of each building. An additional primary material will be form-lined concrete applied on the wall panels at various locations on each building with glass panels serving as a secondary material. Glass has been proposed at the offices areas and at various locations along the wall planes of each building. At the office entrances of each building, there will be a trellis feature. The greatest degree of wall articulation will occur at the corners of the building. C. Sign Program: The proposed modification to the sign program proposes Sign Type 1A for "Major Tenants". Within this category, there are two design options — illuminated channel letters (Option #1) and non-illuminated foam letters (Option #2). There is a monument sign (Sign Type B) proposed at each of the central drive aisle entrances at 7th Street and 8th Street. Miscellaneous address, door, and window identification signs are included (Sign Types C, D, and E). The proposed sign program complies with the standards and guidelines set forth in the Sign Ordinance, including the maximum number of signs per tenant, wall sign construction/materials, and the basic dimensions of each wall sign, including sign area and text height. Each proposed sign location and area meets the intent of the Sign Ordinance. Item IJK4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-01118, DRC2013-01112 and SUBTPM19518— DCT 8T" & VINEYARD LLC May 28, 2014 • Page 5 The amendment to the original Uniform Sign Program is to remove language that permittedp a Sub-Tenant Sign that has been removed and the elevations have changed because of the design change. D. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca and Granger) on April 15, 2014. The Committee concurred that the proposed modifications were an enhancement and recommended that the project be forwarded on to the Planning Commission for review and action. E. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on April 15, 2014 and recommended the project to move forward to Planning Commission for consideration. F. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 10, 2010 in connection with the City's approval of the Development Review of an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 12 buildings and 13 parcels on a triangular shaped parcel of approximately 20.7 acres of land. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was • previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Planning staff has evaluated the remaining development of a 5 building industrial/warehouse complex consisting of 2 existing buildings already constructed, 3 remaining buildings that when combined will total 153,560 square feet of building area, the consolidation of nine parcels to create 3 parcels on approximately 8.61 acres of land and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The new project is similar in size as the previous approval and the new updated studies have identified only one new mitigation measure. This change is in accordance with the newly provided noise impact study prepared by LSA Associates in December of 2013. The proposed new mitigation measure requires the applicant to construct a sound wall with a minimum height of 8 feet along the northwestern project boundary. This new mitigation measure will be added to the Mitigation Monitoring Program. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that only this one additional mitigation measures is required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. The project is substantially the same as the previous project with the exception of 323,square feet of industrial/warehouse area which has been added and included in the Addendum's analysis. The analysis concludes that the project will not have a significant increase on traffic or a significant impact on air quality. The updated studies indicate no new significant effects that were not previously analyzed, and the Addendum to the original environmental Mitigation Monitoring Program is minor. Therefore, pursuant to • CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination Item IJK5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-01118, DRC2013-01112 and SUBTPM19518—DCT 8T" &VINEYARD LLC May 28, 2014 Page 6 that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of the Development Review and Tentative Parcel Map and adopt an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts that was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 10, 2010. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, Candy4B :Ub"V Planning Manager CB:SF/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Plan Exhibit B - Aerial Exhibit C - Landscape Plan Exhibit D - Elevations Exhibit E - Floor Plans Exhibit F - Design Review Action Comments (dated April 15, 2014) Exhibit G - Previous Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program Exhibit H - Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration (dated November 10, 2010) Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2013-01118 Draft Resolution of Approval for Uniform Sign Program Amendment DRC2013- 01120 Item IJK6 • _ _ 8th Street- I �ExisBnp BuIJ4w A/ I(nl�Iul ' 3aLC IICIIGsJJHH . 13 DOCK DOOMTRALEA SPACED ,I Su ho C DOCS DOORS 2]RALLER SPACE AAAA I SYow.ud � I tl. 1 dI I 4 DOCK R S2e0pt 016 Anv I� Exlatln0 i.11dinO B• I I ' 9 sul s, Ile ..... I I DOM A T.AM SPACE! "• I I� I T - � ----------- ------------------------------ --"__ --- !� ].588GGt __ --- Om.1.]q ].Nqp t arm. I • Ex1stlD0 Buldlna D 68,560 Efl rn N�39G p '0=00M G . P]RKER SPACES YY,1 O PROJECT SUMMARY LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS SO. Uw05CAP LANDSCAPE HCl wAlcRoeGl REDUIRE002A) MOVE —AAFi 180020 irfTl 20].028. Jt.si]tl ilae n]2esr 2D.Twa ID Dnr gwAGc�.ni.1 YET p]a1. Lrft : tl uY2a H.fatr � wm. Lr0 '93 AM 1t.as.a 1es]Dr � I I(Aa lcllpes]D]YSAI UxE SI.2wr :],Olir 1232]. ,y _ uvEPAtL Sw.1] 36.53ep 101.M1Atl I •Em q. �O'DA,A. Irl]E fAr1RpG�A �q1 .GMMf KCMG®1 L: AVYrwY PAIUaIC FRDYpEO ITn.anl PAApAD AEprlm 3 DOCK . A.Fa�a.r+•aWrfAG.D....,r.a•.P...1e�. DOORS BAft T`-5. ]. BUILDING CALCULAT10N3 1 OM DWAS tULL0PW IOROss)20.RAI3-0-rA.R WANENOUSE BULLOlelO'OGFICE SO. PArGeYD TO ft I. ]TRKp]SMCE9 rAelE REAR y R. I Elf T l FT I EZZA]IRUSE REWNEp GOR REOUWE0 P iNET1 SQ ARxiw I PARxip !.RLOW1'AT-- 39 O ARE OE ]OR OGGIC'E EOUNtED PROYIOED iSULLDeDMCr]t t0f. 88.1]9 Ce 859 ]0 +,SODY 1.OwJ Y bU M"G. 53.30 0 !l ASO tl A3.]OD r 2A 3230 tl 25 I SU'LLDSr10 w.DeD a 25 00.580 q 5].080 p 2A 1.500 r ].iw a 15 M SULLDeYDE ]3]w ]I S]O GI ]S TJatl 7. 1e0p a] y ❑ ]DTK I ]83.92] 182.821 tl '30.]21 tl IS w0 a ].]Op Y ZI 18 ] . I\ 701 Street EXHIBIT A 8th and Vineyard , Rancho Cucamonga, California : >DCT AAAA. Item IJK7 Ap Wp ila NN ted OMAN t!L'1�r31 IK It LA— _ �• _ t`z icy t. � r ( �•' - " ♦ - N ice..-.-�-. • �* � .3 lit' �X��4 � !I ( Q '�•� j �4 d. ISG r„ '• •�q ( 11 it N DRC2013-01118 & SUBTPM19518 EXHIBIT B �y _ __ =Y i - Y �S PHASE ONE 3 to PHASE TWO ® _::..:�...--- ----- ... CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN Cadd°C�ts.°�,Amta=L,.�� 8th Street and Vineyard Rancho Cucamonga, California !► ,�L,.e °E , ®P H E LAN 0 E V E L 0 P Y E N i rn x - L.--.in All NORTH ELEVAfpNn ATH S T EAST ELEVATION SOUI N ELE VAI ION F r, COLOR AND MATERIAL LEGEND K New Building C 8th and Vineyard Ca��Iile CaylswoM`IdiileG=.I—r Rancho Cucamonga, California DCT Eff NORTH ELEVATION MI LMT EIEVATM MM\\ Nj � `. SOUTNELEVATM x\0 WESM lemon COLOR AND MATERIAL LEGEND New Building D K 8th and Vineyard CTIhb Coauwonn arrriracrs,Inc Rancho Cucamonga,California DCT QT nonT,I ETN EAST ELEVATMN }} 7C L.. L - ® --- ---- -. SW IM EL VAiION qJ-_ HEST ELEVATION - "'^".a COLOR AND MATERWL LEGEND U 't New Building E _ 8th and Vineyard Carob Coalsyd xorlh�Ulilxlh,Inc dDCT Rancho Cucamonga, California rr� _ g 0 Y U v Building C 55,450s m 3 C I 6.300 s0 R. Ofte Ane I II Ej..b.M Rama It ------------------------- New Building C C� ; 8th and Vineyard dDCT - Rancho Cucamonga,California • ri I EMU"Hoar J.SWaq.A GroudLewd ffice OAi 7.300 aq.6 Y.aeraM ' —� •^°�w Building D 60.680 sf A V O New Building D 8th and Vineyard �.b,.�eei,WO,I ACh�,et,7,,1t Rancho_Cucamonga, Callfornia ii I.B00 so.�. rwnaLMl Off..A— IF _ 3DOCK DOORS . Building E 37,530s rD 3 r New Building E Cy CoalSrrurl�NU;,eUS.,nc 8th and Vineyard ' — Rancho Cucamonga, California _ dDCT DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Steve Fowler April 15, 2014 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19518 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC -A proposal to subdivide a property comprised of nine (9) parcels with a combined area of about 375,000 square feet (8.61 acres) into three (3) parcels in conjunction with the modification of a previously approved industrial/warehouse complex comprised within the General Industrial (GI) District located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue -APNs: 0209-151-39 and - 41 through -48. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-01118, Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01118 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC - A review of proposed modifications to a previously approved industrial/warehouse complex and architectural review of three (3) buildings on a property of about 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) within the General Industrial (GI) District, located about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street -APNs: 0209-151-38 through - 48. Related files: Development Review DRC20070-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-01120. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT DRC2013-01120 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC - A • modification of Uniform Sign Program #xxx for a partially constructed industrial/warehouse complex on a property of 20.7 acres within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue -APNs: 0209-151-38 through -48. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-0118, Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, and Minor Exception DRC2008-00152. Background: The overall project was reviewed by the City and approved by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2010 (Related files: Development Review DRC2007-00551 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794). The original approval was for an industrial/warehouse complex on a property of about 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) that was comprised of twelve (12) buildings, ranging in floor area between 130,019 square feet (Buildings Al and A2) to 5,342 square feet (Building L), with a combined floor area of 389,600 square feet and a subdivision of the property into twelve (12) parcels. The applicant constructed three (3) buildings — Buildings Al, A2, and B — and associated improvements, but left the remainder of the project site undeveloped. The overall project site is triangular in shape and is approximately 1,100 feet (east to west) at its widest point along 8th Street and 260 feet (east to west) at its narrowest point along 7th Street. It is approximately 1,200 feet (north to south). The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of approximately 1,100 feet and 1,075 feet, respectively. The overall project site is bound on the west by the Cucamonga flood control channel and beyond that there are single-family residences in the City of Ontario. To the east are industrial office/warehouse buildings and an operations facility for Verizon. To the north is property owned by the City of • Rancho Cucamonga where a City Public Works administration building and a household hazardous waste facility is located. The property to the south is vacant; the zoning of the property and the properties to the north and east is General Industrial (GI) District; and the zoning of the properties to the south is Low Medium (LM) Residential District. EXHIBIT F Item III[1f DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM19518, DRC2013-01118, AND DRC2013-01120—DCE 8TH &VINDYARD, LLC April 15, 2014 Page 2 Design Parameters: The applicant submitted a request to modify the complex by 'deleting' nine (9) of the buildings from the proposal and replacing them with three (3) larger industrialtwarehouse buildings. In conjunction with this revision, the applicant is 'consolidating' nine (9) of the twelve (12) parcels that comprise the complex into three (3) parcels (Parcels 1, 2, and 3) that will correspond with each of the proposed buildings (Buildings C, D, and E). The redesign of the complex will result in three (3) buildings that, when combined with the previously constructed buildings, will have overall floor area of 389,923 square feet — an increase of 323 square feet from the original combined floor area of 389,600 square feet. The architecture of the proposed buildings is consistent with the architecture of the previously approved buildings. The most significant changes are the footprint and the larger size of each building. The basic layout of each building will be typical for warehouse buildings. All of the buildings will have dedicated docks for loading/unloading. All of the buildings will have their respective offices and entrances along the central drive aisle. The loading/unloading areas will be screened from public view by walls and/or the building. Parking for employees and visitors will be generally arranged along the, central drive aisle and near the office entrances. The combined required parking is 287 stalls; 291 parking stalls will be provided. The combined required trailer storage/parking is 41 stalls. The applicant is providing 34 stalls with the previous approval of a Minor Exception (DRC2008-00152). The landscape coverage is 10 percent; the minimum requirement for this Development District is 12 percent. The proposed buildings will be of concrete tilt-up construction. Each building will be painted with a palette of three colors; there will be some variation so that the each building will be painted a different set of three colors. The boldest or darkest of the three colors (that will comprise each palette) will be at the general area around the offices of each building. An additional primary material will be form-lined concrete applied on the wall panels at various locations on each building with glass panels serving as a secondary material. Glass has been proposed at the office areas and at various locations along the wall planes of each building. At the office entrances of each building, there will be a trellis feature. The greatest degree of wall articulation will occur at the corners of the building. The landscape coverage is 10 percent; the minimum requirement for this Development District is 12 percent and this requirement has been met. Sign Design Parameters: The program proposes Sign Type 1A for "Major Tenants." Within this category, there are two design options—illuminated channel letters (Option#1) and non-illuminated foam letters (Option #2). There is a monument sign (Sign Type B) proposed at each of the central drive aisle entrances at 7th Street and 8th Street. Miscellaneous address, door, and window identification signs are included (Sign Types C, D, and E). In general, the proposed sign program complies with the standards and guidelines set forth in the Sign Ordinance, including the maximum number of signs per tenant, wall sign construction/materials, and the basic dimensions of each wall sign, including sign area and text height. Each proposed sign location and area meets the intent of the Sign Ordinance. The overall changes in this modification are that the original Uniform Sign Program had a Sub-Tenant Sign that has been removed and the elevations have changed because of the design change. Staff Comments: The following comments.are intended to provide an outline J6r Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. None at this time. Item IJK17 DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM19518, DRC2013-01118, AND DRC2013-01120—DCE 8TH & VINDYARD, LLC April 15, 2014 • Page 3 Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. None at this time Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All groundmounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted forest green. 2. All Double Detector Checks (DDCs) and Fire Department Connections (FDCs) shall be screened on three sides behind the 4-foot high walls. The walls shall incorporate the design and materials used on the buildings. 3. The employee lunch area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. 4. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. 5. Incorporate undulating berms along the street frontages (where applicable), within the landscape ® setback and landscape areas. The highest part of the berms should be at least 3 feet in height. 6. Decorative paving shall be provided at all vehicular access points onto the site. Decorative paving is already proposed at the main drive entrances at 7th and 8th Streets, but it is missing from the secondary access point located on the west side of Building A. 7. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 8. Provide durable street furniture in outdoor employee eating area, such as tables, chairs, waste receptacles. 9. All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: The project was approved as presented. Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Staff Planner. Mayuko Nakajima Item IJK18 L • r. Viµ ,J.✓ �' rl'sFn i,a„ f � i, r;,.. - �:�� U �. .�. ,�'.-;.�fit='''S ` 1 � t I, �/liJ.�i►�..1 �._ .. s Jr��)aa) W � ,.�'; � � tib. .�. ",•.-� __ � - �Q, f � t {{ aaA � r _ d• e t e PA VA �s ? kµ,, ��.��'ttt-`. Q1j`- it-33" i ' •i ��es r 4 c dtc�, Y �4 r 3• ! i�' 1� {1 �� f �. :•,� zC���{.;,q`�,�'tt t{{('�R�• � 1 i,�{ySi �. a y Y p.� I J • t 4 � res°t �.r � �� L ( � ♦h - If, .? .t q' � r 1 g"� • 47it `4 � z� S u{- . ;� '� a, ' � � � � 7..3 � Ai.1♦§�. d � � u t a. � � � '.:� �: �i�-�•A pfd ti t �a � � - t�x� �i �� o ��'� w � r.� I ` �a - � � _ � � zi+�.r. �.. �: WR>?;t >����a f � � 'k��� � 4r i� �� ..1 �;r ,::a + � w 7,s�A 4 v a L f .t4 s ,�'? S �..1 �''-drµ, �4�� l� .'t .Y �� �. to� � ," c � ` .� �� 1 � iso S ., T � � � yy :.t .� � CtPr ,( � �-, r� .... Y .tt s x ' - '�k.�" J"k -.v,. st 4aM+•,a.5v >_r'�3.z,.x,.. �r f rt xe N J.,r• %!s x},G i y�2'fq•k' g�`Jfl+ df°� � N P 1 a. :tl e ..�''�}a-�Y.r}7'� QST�t_ • }._ ,�w •;..r>.... '..•a•`��' '`F 7� r mak# - �;�q F� �„y, 1 ��' 'fi�^ —�'�1Cww r +r* a ti � ' - '"r r�•�,�- K'i �. ti�t y. atm- '�.4i�i i, a �+. � .. '►q";';��t""r'��, r.:'.r , i �, .I..,r tii: '.,%•n rmi& 'tom-i a e •� °{ t ^*'�:t s. ....,...,� his ���� � � �, �.•'�t�...�, -', ..— :., Site Photograhs Exhibit 1 ; 4 2 . 3 7 N (:DI -4 Location/direction of site photo (compass directions acceptable for all photos) Item IJK24 z — u 1 - c r n e cry 61'. f� 1 4J :c-n b�7rt 7 '•� 117 �I��. fit} �y"� iry �MISS Wm­ M d1♦!,s®9 s - hkl�l�fild UN IL am INK Illf mile a �® mom aZ r`� mow,"!' r•t�. •� ail ��_�.� �p�•� s`! 111 VO-5 Z � 10�1t'!•Il�e ■����R� F14 nnt) :� µ z U 7IF aim .�ififl 1 . ■ NNN,1�I ,1ft a ANN Oro G:ti Y, _ iii) rn L•/'YV is''� i v hn v St■• fy. l:._d_ �-:Ih✓ rY �; tf•rry C71• adn�vhr� Ur a, {, • • • '1•' t • • • • • • • • of • • • 1 •• • 1 11 Page 1 of 1 c ]er Blvd 0 J i � 4 � C C E - - � m 8th-5 �B It.Dgve -E Hi land-CV1 II St jv �J l Go 0 _ I � 4, - - - - - —TthSr-- � j 4 > m l ;ED r y m 4-- L 11 R a ��M a ¢da j��pp lso`.QLy I I f USGS Quadrant Sheet 450ft N LandVisionLite • Copyright @ 2006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the oroprietary prupryty c4 the contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. http://maps.digitalmapcentral-com/production/Lana v isionLite/v07r6p2/index.htm1 7/10/2007 Item IJK26 j•;�,,• ��� +ASI l i fh�-.>• �_ ..����'•r�__�__'_. � JCfSi•.y.61ift� ilk,,'c' � .. .. "} -- - `� _�L'_®EIL.4� I }_$ ITh r• � .�� i1A^ '•t' . 1 is 7 - Ir j '�,} _ �ill•"�!197y` '."Y �" .rR...>rr;,,W,rlm.�,. .' _ f it If �'.. - ya y�i'..�w""' :. ...<.«.eRaiSs_ .a.uL'nii. �_:1 .,H ")��!• x�• - _ �'4^r r..u. _ .. SCIS-*r �=4 w _ .. :.•ty`L carts `�� i tt ! '' ,B.YII St t Y,.�lc.+� ,a•� •r, ,� ;,x,'31 `'�; A .t:` ,i .� �„--.-., I r ��- r` F L .'.'U • r:. . Y �i I R.Cy�ilf 1 w. 49 Zf •s � t'•� I �'L '"�'.1.. �'��f y �'�.E 1/411•Y+' � I _ til'-' � _ + '"'sa ,� •y`' ...:` «y. • -•Ji � � �� �.�+i'.'.1 , 'fir] .1. -� ✓{t Vil t�_���� ' ++l�f• �14.�«�, ;,. �.__+__ Y� -Qt . F. Rig hl. t cyGtl r, r ; ' -.fid• ''..I°k , -# 9 .._. i t! C�., ... R . IrF_r 1 Irr :_'fir L r E ti y i v i ilvr 4 �_• a .» i :� p , t 'h.. .w._...ic, .s.is•.,_h.Jl °yE,fS(a�iCl J C-t �Ir J� � '� '� �a� _ J1.l�t*�,�i�.'� •I���,'�c v .K.�� i � I .Y� f -�b� �� (" �.�,� �I�.4" II y �. i 'y '! n1 �. - :•L.�� ,+S:�P 6 - i --� t7r: �, 1iJa�.�l j' ! ! 3, • .=F '# L�., 7�•4L` ,v� � I I.._ •"!7L ton L l _ J �'p t 'I•, Jim� �- J1�' {• ,�,,.� �., -__ � / I. #•'i",t'• r I`111'•Cii ,� �� I• � �` � .. � �A. � � .. 9.y y y , 'air.. a tib ar;!<3jfn�', _ 'Q• rz•;::"'1r"rf. '-K r. �:� * 1 . � �1' l �� �I �D��"• 1 � I ••1�� PI 41 •n i ' Y p d rYj~N st2 •. sg � ¢ 7 _ r i IAit t �k 111)I ;t-. � e City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Development Review DRC2007-00551 2. Related Files: Minor Exception DRC2008-00152 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC - A proposal to subdivide a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of approximately 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) into twelve (12) parcels in conjunction with the development of an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 12 buildings in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 3 located at the south side of 8th Street approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue - APN: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, and 0209-161-24. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Development Review DRC2007-00551 - A proposal to develop an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 12 buildings and 12 parcels on a triangular shaped property of approximately 904,0.00 square feet (20.7 acres) in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 3 located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street-APN: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, and 0209-161-24. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: ® Terri Allen DCT Industrial Trust 23 Corporate Plaza, Suite 120 Newport Beach, CA 92660 S. General Plan Designation: General Industrial 6. Zoning: General Industrial (GI) District(Subarea 3) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of approximately 904,000 square feet(20.7 acres). The project site is triangular in shape that is approximately 1,100 feet (east to west) at its widest point along 8th Street and 260 feet (east to west) along 7th Street. It is approximately 1,650 feet(north to south). The site is vacant; vegetation is limited to low grasses and a small grouping of trees. The property is bound on the south and west by the Cucamonga flood control channel and beyond that there are single- family residences in the City of Upland. To the east are industrial office/warehouse buildings and an operations facility for Verizon. To the north is property owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the site for a proposed public works administration building and a household hazardous waste facility. To the southeast are additional residences. The zoning of the part of the property located between 7th and 8th Street is General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), while the zoning of the part of the property south of 7th Street is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the .oropertiesto^the..n9lth and east are General-InJustrial GI` District (Cuci ria''2')`"tihT�' eraf'ln'dustrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), respectively. The zoning of the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga ® Planning Department Item IJK28 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 and DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 Page 2 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith,Associate Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR—Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR—Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG—Reactive Organic Gases PM10—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP-Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G—Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (x) Aesthetics (x) Agricultural Resources (x)Air Quality () Biological Resources (x) Cultural Resources (x) Geology&Soils () Hazards &Waste Materials (x) Hydrology&Water Quality () Land Use& Planning () Mineral Resources (x) Noise () () Population &.Housing Public Services () Recreation (x)Transportation/Traffic () Utilities&Service Systems () Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (x) I find that although the proposedip ct could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in t ' e bec�use revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by,the project propon t. ITI TED NEGATIVE DECLARATIO wi I be prepared. Prepared By: Date: (5- (o Reviewed By: Date: Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK29 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 3 Leas Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • c) The site is located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street and-is characterized by industrial development to the north and east, and residential development to the west, south, and southeast. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. • d) The project would increase the number of street lights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project.- a) roject:a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the ._Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a , ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK30 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 4 Less Than Significant Lege Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: P0t8" "�" Than PP g Slpnincant art Mltlgation SipnlficeM Ivo Iffoact Inco ed impact I act C) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (✓) Which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street and is characterized by industrial development to the north and east, and residential development to the west, south, and southeast. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to General Plan Table RC-2. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful;therefore,they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City.- c) The site is located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street and is characterized by industrial development to the north and east, and residential development to the west, south, and southeast. There are no agricultural uses within one mile of the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project., a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air' quality standard or -contribute () (✓) () () substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainmerit under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (includiing releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK31 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues.and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation significant No Im act Incor orated Im act Im act d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the ability of the region to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Also, according to the Air Quality Study prepared by Associated Engineers in October 2009, the proposed project is not predicted to cause or exacerbate any violations of the proposed (National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) or State Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). A regional analysis has shown that the operational emissions of the project burden levels are below the daily operational significance thresholds. b) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, • heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. According to the Air Quality Study prepared by Associated Engineers in October 2009, during the construction phase of the project, the project is predicted to meet the daily construction regional significance thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the SCAQMD on a project-specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was • investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK32 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Im aet Ineo oratetl Im act Im aet conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose .of surplus excavated ,material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph.) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical :soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK33 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 7 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (No2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Long Term (Operational) Emissions - In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 10) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 12) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. • 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 17) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 19) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules _around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact-for-• which-•a-Staten:ent-- of,°Overriding Cons iderations'-Was.'ultimately" adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as • a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK34 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 8 Less Than Significant Lose Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorponated Impact Impact ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor — residences to the west and southwest of the project site. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b)above and the following mitigation measure will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. 20)- All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9,2009. e) Construction Odors (short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from residential uses would be like cooking and gardening. Similarly common odors associated with mixed-use and commercial land uses would be expected (i.e. restaurants). Local odors from the majority of land uses would be similar to other urban areas and would not be considered significant. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and therefore are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) pr;oth,er,,seOsitive.natural.community identified.in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK35 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 9 • :. Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with industrial and residential uses. The • perimeter of the site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding development. The interior of the site is relatively undisturbed. According to the General Plan Figure RC4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife may potentially move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the sphere of influence. The City is required to acquire and/or protect open space areas that provide strategic wildlife corridors to vital habitat areas. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are several heritage trees on the project site. These trees will be removed for the construction of the project. To comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance, the --,-,application will be required to submit an-application-to remove the trees. ' s,the—applicant is already proposing to install a significant number of trees and landscaping as part of the proposed project, no additional mitigations are required. f) Neither the City nor the sphere-of-influence are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other • approved State habitat conservation plan area. The project site is not located within a Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK36 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No I act Inco orated Impact Impact local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) {✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as aHistoric Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City.of Rancho Cucamonga will: e Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources,following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical. resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK37 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Pae 11 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where • mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to,the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The perimeter of the site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding development. The interior of the site is relatively undisturbed. No known religious or sacred sites edmvithin the 'project'area. No evidence is in place'to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State • Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK38 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 12 Less Than Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact regulations is required for all development,.no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreadingi subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault passes 1.25 mile northwest and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing M,N 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M,N 7.5 earthquakes is 12.5 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 15 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK39 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 13 ® LessThan Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be • applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the sphere-of-influence for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam and Tujunga Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam and Tujunga Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically stable. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK40 i Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a. site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil. Additionally, through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal r'equir'ements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK41 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 15 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Im act Im act occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency'coalition that is considered a full-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the {process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No adverse impacts are anticipated. C) There is a school, Bear Gulch Elementary at 8355 Bear Gulch Place, located approximately 0.5-mile from the project site. The project will be required to comply with existing State and Federal standards on the use and transport of hazardous materials. The proposed buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each • Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is' updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wind-driven fire in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone • according to General Plan Figure PS-1. Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK42 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 16 Lose Than Significant Less Issues and Su pp g Sign�cortin Information Sources: Pgnifi am With Than arit Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓} site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓} the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect.flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓). Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various..aspects of the National Pollution.Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK43 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 17 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the project will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Associated Engineers in July 2007, which identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall • include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK44 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 18 Lass Than Significant Less Fafty With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Im ad I irpomted Impact Impact grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary. berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Associated Engineers in July 2007 to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Post- Construction Operational: 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Associated Engineers in July 2007 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be approximately 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK45 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 19 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. • f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development or significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving. permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be sulliniitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected. • Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK46 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ?otentiWith Than PP g Sign�eard M With Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact.. Impact h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of nonsignificance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street and is characterized by industrial development to the.north and east, and residential development to the west, south, and southeast. This project will .be of similar design and size to the surrounding industrial development to the east. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is General Industrial. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK47 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 21 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant. Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: ® a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: _ a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. No adverse impacts expected. • Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C-85 Item IJK48 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Then Significant MitigaLon Significant I No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. The City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed building; hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby commercial uses is expected. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No impacts are anticipated. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence are not anticipated to increase the,ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measure shall then be required: 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is within 2 miles of a public airport. Located approximately 1.75 mile northerly of the Ontario Airport and is off-set north of the flight path. The site is within the CNEL noise contour. However, the project is an industrial complex comprised of twelve (12) buildings that will be constructed of concrete tilt-up panels. The building materials used in the construction of the buildings will Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK49 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT.REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 23 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact sufficiently mitigate potential noise impacts. Also, the anticipated uses within each building include industrial manufacturing tenants. These tenants may generate noise within the building that will exceed the noise levels generated by overflying aircraft. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project.- a) roject:a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: • a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is industrial and therefore contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected. C) The project site is industrial and is vacant land. No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? _.. . . Ed) Police protection?Schools? Parks? e) Other public facilities? • Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK50 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Pacie 24 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Signcant No Int ad Inco orated Int act Int al:l Comments: a) The site located.approximately 640 feet west of Hellman. Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street would be served by a fire station, Fire Station #2 at 9612 San Bemardino Road, located approximately 1.25 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) . Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. C) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Golden Oak Park at 9345 Golden Oak Road is located approximately 0.25 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that „ .. ,sub,$tantialh sical deterioration of the facility would PY y occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK51 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM1870A Pa a 25 Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: =Significant Significant TLess han Inco oratetl Im as Im act Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Golden Oak Park at 9345 Golden Oak Road is located approximately 0.25 mile from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project., a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in ( ) ( ) ( ) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the (�) street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of ( ) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or • highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change i location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses(e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ( ) ( ) (.) 0g) Conflict with adopted ( ) ( ) ((.0p policies, plansor programs ( ) ( ) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: a) The proposed project includes the development of twelve (12) industrial buildings. According to a Traffic Study prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. in July 2008, the project will generate 2,625 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was preeared, _ —and a,nd, impacts evaluated. The,project is in an area that is most) develo ed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a ~ r trl substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by • the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. . Fees are used to. fund roadway Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK52 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 26 as Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Impact improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) According to a Traffic Study prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. in July 2008, the project will generate 235 trips during the am peak hour and 247 trips during the pm peak hour. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit: The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. C) Located approximately 1.75 mile northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is off-set north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontages of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The design of the project includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK53 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 27 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓} wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( } ( ) ( } (✓} water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( j ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants: The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for build-out of the General Plana The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK54 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wan Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Impact d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( } ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. - - b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 and DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 Page 29 effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, -Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section • 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive: (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (T) Air Quality Study (Associated Engineers, October 2009) _.. :. ....(T)...:... Traffic Study— (LSA ,......, . (LSA Associates, Inc., July 2008) (T) Water Quality Management Plan (Associated Engineers, July 2007) Rev. 8/23/2010 Item IJK56 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 and DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 . Page 30 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the pitied plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point.where dearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: .:� F Date: f I Print Name and Title: ?r' i I Rev.8/23/2010 Item IJK57 A AdEFINk City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review DRC2007-00551 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 ti This Mitigation Monitoring Program(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigaon measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessarybased upon • recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation)that relate to that department. Procedures-The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants'fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • Item IJK58 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 DCT INDUSTRIAL TRUST Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and.date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures.The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. B. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Item IJK59 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Development Review DRC2007-00551 and Tentative Parcel Ma SUBTPM18794 Applicant: DCT Industrial Trust Initial Study Prepared by: Mike Smith Associate Planner Date: September 13 2010 RUT Lit 7Qua '• • ' . . 11 �11019=11 ty ' �;.y . . y. ;` ti' _ ; ruction equipment shall be maintained in good PD7 7777 condition so as to reduce operational Review of plans A/C s. The contractor shall ensure that all2/4 ion equipment is being properly serviced and d as per manufacturers' specifications. nce records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the PD/BO developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City C Review of plans C denoting the proposed schedule and projected 2 equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction C) equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. C Review of plans A/C Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or 2/4 high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance stanTnoted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. B Review of plans A/C 2 All construction equipment shall comply with SCARules 402 and 403.' Additionally, contractors C Review of plans A/C include the following provisions: 2/4 1 of 9 • - ■ Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO - through seeding and watering. C Review of plans A/C 2/4 ■ Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C ■ Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. C Review of plans A/C Z4 • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO exposed excavated soil during and after the end of C Review of plans A/C work periods. 2/4 ■ Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO accordance with local ordinances and use sound C Review of plans A engineering practices. 4 ■ Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public C During q thoroughfares fir occurs as a result of hauling. construction 4 Timing may var�depending upon the time of year of construction. B Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., BO ■ C During q � wind speeds exceeding 25 mph)in accordance with 4 SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. construction • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other C During q 4 suitable means. ; Construction The site shall b treated with water or other BO soil-stabilizing age (approved by SCAQMD and C During q Regional Water Quality Control Board[RWQCB]) daily construction 4 to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction C During q areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to construction 4 reduce PM,o emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. C Review of plans A/C 4 2 of 9 1 •• M611:1 MIR Wim •• • -• The construction contractor shall ensure that BO -FJ • construction-grading plans include a statement that work C Review of plans A/C crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 2/4 Projects shall be developed under the proposed 2010 General Plan Update implemdnting the following measures, derived from the SCAQMD's AQMP, where feasible, in order to reduce criteria air pollutant emissions, primarily related to vehicular travel and energy. Potential measures for consideration in future projects include: ■ Provide adequate ingress and egress at all CE entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle A Review of plans A/C idling at curbsides. 2/4 ■ Provide preferential parking to high occupancy PD vehicles and shuttle services. A Review of plans A/C 4 ■ Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during PD _ off-peak hoqrs. E Review of plans A '* 4/6 3 Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and BO/PD reduce thermal load with automated time clocks A Review of plans A/C Nor occupant sensors. 2/3 ■ Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant PD species to reduce water consumption and to A Review of plans A/C provide passive solar benefits. 4 ■ Provide lightdr color roofing and road materials BO/PD and tree pla ing programs to comply with the A Review of plans A/C . AQMP Misellaneous Sources MSC-01 3/4 , measure. All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged C Review of plans A periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 4 All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate PD preferential parking for vanpools. C Review of plans A/C 2/3 All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or PD more employees shallbe required to post both bus and C Review of plans D Metrolink schedules inconspicuous areas. 2/3 3of9 i 14 ■■ ■ -. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or PD more employees shall be required to configure their C Review of plans D operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to 2/3 the extent reasonably feasible. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga BO shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management vB Review of plans C/A District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 2/4 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices(i.e.fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or o preserve them for study. With the assistance of the 3 archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated PD/BO C W sites from demolition or significant modification Review of report A/D 3/4 without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider est4lishing provisions to require PD/BO C incorporation ofd archaeological sites within new Review of report A/D 3/4 developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. ■ Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C archaeological heritage of the area. Review of report A/D 3/4 Propose mitigation measures and recommend PD/BO C conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project Review of report A/D 3/4 effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. 4of9 t r .. • 11 gloss Prepare a technical resources management report, PD C �' • documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Review of report A/D 3/4 proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report,with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal PD B fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the Review of report A/D 4 developer will retain qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a repot of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: . B — Assign a paleontological monitor, trainedand PD B equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Review of report A/D 4 minimal construction delay, to the site full-time Fduring the interval of earth-disturbing activities. uld fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C graded, diYert earth-disturbing activities Review of report A/D 4where until the monitor has completed salvage. nstruction pei-sonnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for PD p documentation in the summary report and transfer to Review of report D 3 an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of RanchFPD — DCucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with Review of report D3 copy to the repdrt to San Bernardino Count Museum. I l 5of9 �i S • 10171= j . •• [Sidi• • • • • Geology and Soils The site shall be treated with water or other BOC soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and During q RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance construction 4 with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o C During q emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil construction 4 off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO speeds exceed 25,mph to minimize PM,c) emissions C During q from the site during such episodes. construction 4 Chemical soil-stabilizersa ( pproved by SCAQMD and BO C RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction During A 4 areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to construction 3 reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to issuance of grading permits,the permit applicant BO shall submit to Building Official for a B/Cid Review of plans A/C pproval, Storm 2/4 Water Pollution Preyention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on4ite to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. i a� t 6 of 9 t • - • • • - .. . An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed B/C/D. Review of plans q/C project that identifies specific measures to control on- 2/4 site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California,and b An inspection and! maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as BO sandbags or graver dikes must be used to prevent B/C/D Review of plans A/C discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there 2/4 M is rainfall or other runoff. B During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO 01 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and B/C/D Review of plans A/C Cn after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to 2/4 prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by B/C/D Review of plans A/C Associated Engineers in July 2007 to reduce pollutants 2/4 during construction e6tering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. i F shall implement the BMPs identified in BOuality Management Plan prepared by B/C/D Review of plans A/Cgineers=in July 2007 to reduce pollutants2/4 ion entering the storm drain system to the nt practical. r r 7 of 9 f ITS] 11119 Me Landscaping - • p g plans shall include provisions for BO controlling and minimizing the use of B/C/D Review of plans A/C fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall 2/4 be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall BO submit to the City Engineer fora B/C/D Review of plans A/C Quality Management Plan (WQMP)approval a project 2/4 description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by 3 the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. ;1� Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI)to comply B/C/D Review of plans A/C with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant 2/4 Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a cpy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Numb r) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for cpverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO $ � hours of 8:00 P.M. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, C During q including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday ora construction 4 national holiday. 8of9 MITI Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO standards specified in Development Code Section C During q 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. construction 4 Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02'120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the `Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if t noise levels exceed the above standards, then the Lonsultant shall immediately notify the Building Official.' If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO hours of 8:00 p.m, and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, C During q including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a construction 4/7 national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construd tion site),then the developer shall 00 prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbfeviations Responsible Person K - Monitori - CDD-Community Development Director or designee+ A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection a ARLS v PD-Planning Director or.designee B-Prior To Construction 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CE-City Engineer or designee B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or BuildiPermit BO-Building Official or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check ng D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Certificate rde of Occupancy PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating FC-Fire Chief or designee 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds 6-Revoke CUP 7-Citation 9 of 9 ++vnnfVt�W/1 I riiiitrurin � SEC 19 2013 ENVIRONMENTAL RECEIVED - PINING INFORMATION FORM RANCHO (Part I - Initial Study) (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) CUCAMONGA Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic,noise, biological, drainage,and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part If as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. GENERAL O- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal, City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information, Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: 2a� 3 Q (�t Sub 7-1-1 ( TPI f Project Title: DCT 8th &Vineyard LLC Name&Address of project owner(s): DCT 8th &Vineyard LLC - 12 Corporate Plaza, Suite 150, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor: DCT Industrial- 12 Corporate Plaza, Suite 150, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Updated 4l' EXHIBIT H Page 1of10 Item IJK69 Contact Person &Address: Terri Allen - 12 Corporate Plaza, Suite 150, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Name &Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): Amanda Criscione- 12 Corporate Plaza, Suite 150, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone Number. 949-219-1243 PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk(')is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): South of 8th Street, East of Hellman Ave, North of 7th Street 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37 '5) Gross Site Area(ac/sq. ft.): 19.36 acres "6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed dedications): 18.51 acres 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): The site is currently entitled under DCR 07-0551. This application proposes a modification to the existing entitlements to modify the site plan and related parcel map. There are no proposed general plan amendments or zone changes anticipated. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 2 of 10 Item IJK70 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project ® Grading permit, building,mechanical, electrical, plumbing and other standard permits as required for completion of industrial shell buildings and future tenant improvements as required by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography,soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i,e.,geological and(or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): Except for the two buildings that are under construction,the site is vacant land. There are no plants animals, mature trees,trails, roads or other scenic aspects currently on site. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 3 of 10 Item IJK71 10) Describe the known cultural and/orhistor and oral history): ical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports In accordance with a phase 1 environmental study, no known prior uses were cited and the area has been unimproved land. As the project was previously entitled as DRC 07-00551, no known cultural or historical aspects were uncovered during the research, planning and prior approval. 11) Describe any noise sources and theirlevels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses. There is currently an operating train track that is North of our 8th Street property line,which has shown no affects on our proposed uses. As it has always been an existing feature of the sites noise. The property is also adjacent to Industrial buildings to the North and East with existing truck traffic. Which also do not effect the proposed use. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase,and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: The proposed project will consist of a five building industrial park. Two of the five buildings are currently under construction and are set to be completed quarter one of 2014 as approved under the existing DRC 07-0551. If this modifications per this application are approved,the modified project will contain 5 buildings or 3 additional to what exists today. We have identified users for 2 of the remaining 3 buildings and intent to pursue construction on the remaining buildings immediately pending approval of this application. At full build out,the project will contain 5 buildings ranging from 39,330 SF to 129,704. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops,department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height,frontage, setback,rear yard, etc.): The subject site is bound to the North by 8th Street and an existing/operating train track. Is bound to the East by a Verizon Wireless operations center and to the South by residential single family homes. The West side -ofthe-project is bound by a flood control channel with the City of Ontario residential homes butting up to the far West side. Our in park has been designed to meet all industrial zoned projects development standards and requirements.There are no plants animals cultural or historical or anything of scenic significant Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 Item IJK72 14) Will the proposed project change the pattem,scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No it will not, as it was originally entitled to be 11 industrial buildings and if the entitlement modifications ® are approved the site will be developed to 5 buildings,which will follow the same guidelines 15) Indicate the We of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? The short term noise that will be generated will be that of the site construction,which is not expected to create an excessive amount of noise. The construction will commence and end at times during the day which will accommodate the surrounding areas, and which are in accordance with the city noise ordinance. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: There are no trees to be removed on site as the site is unimproved land. 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: N/A • 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gallday) Peak use(gallDay) b. Commercial/Ind. (galldaylac) 6,000 80 Peak use(gallminlac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑Septic Tank x0 Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See AttachmentA for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gaUday) b. CommerciaUlndustrial(galldaylac) 6,000 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 Item IJK73 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 20) Number of residential units. Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes,minimum lot size and maximum lot size: i Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: i Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent(per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: i 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type.. 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project. Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B. a. Elementary. b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS_ 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial,industrial or institutional uses: Major uses of an industrial warehouse would be used for storage,warehousing and/or distribution. s the users are not known,the processes may vary by location.. i Updated 4/11/2013 Page 6 of 10 i Item IJK74 26) Total floor area of commercial,industrial, or institutional uses by type: 366,323 27) Indicate hours of operation: Standard operation-Single shift Monday-Friday, up to 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. As not all of the buildings have known users, future hours of operation may vary. 28) Number of employees: 43-70 Total: Maximum Shin` varies Time of Maximum Shift: varies 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): Buildings will be for lease or sale and not all occupancies are known. There will be a mix of management, office, administration and warehouse employees. As the developer of buildings for sale or lease,we are able to provide detailed information. 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City..TBD • '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818)572t6283).of pollution emissions. (Data should be Air pollution will be generated by mobile emmissions from truck traffic to and from the site as consistent with the general plan and as detailed in the traffic, noise and air quality studies. ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the projectbeen contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? /f so,please indicate their response. Yes they have,all agencies have confirmed to provide adequate service. ® Updated 4/11/2013 Page 7 of 10 Item IJK75 i 33) In the known history of this property,has there been any use,storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic ma Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include,but are not limited to PCBs,•radioactive substances,pesterials? ticides and herbicides,fuels,oils,solvents,and otherf/ammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use,storage, and/or discharge on the property, known. as well as the dates of use,if None that are known. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? if yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas,shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. None that are known at this time. 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm fees apply to this project. AN checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning CommissionlPlanning Director hearing.- hereby earing:hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief l further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamo a. Date: l Signature: Title: U Updated 4/11/2013 Page 8 of 10 Item IJK76 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family. 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 40800 gal/day/unit (tenant) 0 General Commercial 2 gal/day/unit(tenant) Office Professional 69471 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 2 gal/day/unit(tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit(tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day • General Commercial 19 Office Professional 00 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering& Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 • Updated 4/11/2013 Page 9 of 10 Item IJK77 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 i Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 i Updated 4/11/2013 Page 10 of 10 Item IJK78 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project Files: Development Review DRC2013-01118; Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518 and Uniform Sign Program Amendment DRC2013-01120 2. Related Files: Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map 18794, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19518 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC: A proposal to subdivide a property comprised of nine (9) parcels with a combined area of about 375,000 square feet (8.61 acres) into three (3) parcels in conjunction with the modification of a previously approved industrial/warehouse complex comprised in the General Industrial (GI) District located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-39 and -41 through -48. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00551 was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2010. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration Related files: Development Review DRC2013-01118, Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, Minor Exception ® DRC2008-00152, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01118 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC: A review of proposed modifications to a previously approved industrial/warehouse complex and architectural review of three (3) buildings on a property of about 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) in the General Industrial (GI) District located about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street; APNs: 0209-151-38 through -48. A Mitigated Negative . Declaration for DRC2007-00551 was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2010. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration Related files: Development Review DRC20070-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-01120. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT DRC2013-01120 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC: A modification of Uniform Sign Program #221 for a partially constructed industrial/warehouse complex on a property of 20.7 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-38 through -48. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-0118, _ Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Tentative • Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Minor Exception DRC2008-00152. V JJ 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: DCT 8th & Vineyard LLC Attn: Terri Allen 12 Corporate Plaza, Suite 150 Item IJK79 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-01118 and SUBTPM19518 Page 2 Newport Beach, CA 92660 5. General Plan Designation: General Industrial 6. Zoning: General Industrial (GI) District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The original project site was triangular shaped and comprised 20.7 acres of land.. The new remainder portion of the project comprises of 8.61 acres of vacant land located on the south side of 8' Street west approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue. The majority of the project site is located between 7th and 8th Streets. The remainder, approximately 38,952 square feet (0.89 acre) in area, is located on the south side of 7th Street. The property is bound on the south and west by the Cucamonga flood control channel and beyond that are single-family residences in the City of Ontario. To the east are industrial officetwarehouse buildings and an operations facility for Verizon. To the north is property owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga where the public works administration building and a household hazardous waste facility are located. To the southeast are additional residences. The zoning of the part of the property located between 7th and 8th Street is General Industrial (GI) District, while the zoning of the part of the property south of 7th Street is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north and east are General Industrial (GI) District and-General Industrial (GI) District, respectively. The zoning of the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. No demolition or removal of significant vegetation or trees will be required. The parcel is relatively flat, sloping towards the south. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None. ANALYSIS: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City of Rancho Cucamonga certified an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 10, 2010 in connection with the approval of Development Review DRC2007-00551 and Tentative Parcel.,M;pp,,9uB-TPM18794. . .. .... .. ..�.... t- ...+........ rJIl c. .....moi. vt ...i .. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), no subsequent or supplemental Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of Item IJ K80 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-01118 and SUBTPM19518 Page 3 the previous Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant • environmental effects of a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The project site was partially developed following the approval of DRC2007-00551 and Tentative Parcel Map 18794. The 20.7 acre site was originally approved for a twelve (12) building industrial/warehouse complex and the thirteen (13) lot subdivision of 20.7 acres of vacant land. The proposed project entails modifying the original project by reducing the number of building from nine (9) into three (3) and combining nine (9) parcels into three (3) totaling 8.61 acres of land. The combination of building increases the overall square footage by 323 square feet. The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration approved for DRC2007-00551and SUBTPM18794 identified "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" impacts in the areas of Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, and Noise and established Mitigation Measures to address the identified issues. "Less Than Significant Impacts" were discussed in the areas of Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Biological Resources, Hydrology and Water Quality, and Transportation/Traffic. For This Initial Study Addendum the applicant has prepared a revised Trip Generation Analysis dated December 13, 2013 by LSA Associates, Inc. and this report did not identify any additional "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" or "Less Than Significant Impacts". The applicant also prepared an Air Quality Analysis December 2013 by LSA Associates, Inc. This report provided additional analysis under the Air quality and Greenhouse Gas section. No new mitigation measures were identified. The applicant also prepared a Noise Impact Study, December 2013 by LSA Associates, Inc. which required one new mitigation measure. • New Mitigation Measure: Construct a sound wall along the project's north western property line with a minimum height of 8 Feet above the pad elevation that can be a combination of berms and concrete masonry units. All Mitigation Measures established for the original project along with the amended measure will be addressed during the plan check, construction, and inspection of the project site during development. In consideration of the proposed modification to the original project, there are no identified substantial changes which will require major revisions to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred, which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previously certified Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous Negative Declaration due to the involvement of.new significant environmental..effects. ora .substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The proposed project entails modifying the original project by reducing the number of building from nine (9) into three (3) and combining nine (9) parcels into three (3) totaling 8.61 acres of land. The combination of buildings increases the overall square footage by 323 square feet. The • original development was thoroughly analyzed for environmental impacts, mitigation measures Item IJK81 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-01118 and SUBTPM19518 Page 4 were established, and those mitigation measures have and will be implemented during construction to address identified impacts. Although the proposed project involves the combination of nine (9) smaller buildings into three (3) larger buildings with a small addition of 323 square feet of building area and reduction in the number of parcels from nine (9)to three (3) parcels, there are no substantial changes that have occurred with respect to.the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration. All Mitigation Measures established for the original project will be addressed during the plan check, construction, and inspection of the project site during development. The proposed project will be constructed in the same area as originally reviewed and established but will have different footprints than approved in the original project. The proposed project does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered and the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the original Development Review application. (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project. All Mitigation Measures established for the original project along with the added mitigation measure will be addressed during the plan check, construction, and inspection of the project site during development. The project will have mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible, and therefore, an additional mitigation measures is required. One mitigation measure has been added as follows: New Mitigation Measure: Construct a sound wall along the project's north western property line with a minimum height of 8 Feet above the pad elevation that can be a combination of berms and concrete masonry units. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to an adopted Negative Declaration may be prepared if none of the conditions in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent Negative Declaration have occurred. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of this Development Review application. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Initial Study pursuant Item IJK82 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-01118 and SUBTPM19518 Page 5 • to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier Initial Study, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signed: ,U Steve Fowler Assistant Planner May 28, 2014 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive: (X) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) • (X) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (X) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, Certified January 4, 1989) (X) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (X) Air Quality Study (Associated Engineers, October, 2009) (X) Traffic Study (LSA Associates, Inc., July 2008) (X) Water Quality Management Plan. (Associated Engineers, July, 2007) (X) Noise Impact Study (LSA associates, Inc., December 2013) . (X) Air Quality Analysis (LSA Associates, Inc. December, 2013) (X) Health Risk Analysis ® (LSA Associates, Inc. December, 2013) Item IJK83 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-01118 and SUBTPM19518 Page 6 (X) Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan. (Parsons Brinckerhoft, December, 2013) (X) Revised Trip Generation Study,for 8n' and Vineyard (December 13, 2013) (X) Initial Study Part II for DRC2007-00551 Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00551 (November 10, 2010) I. I i Item IJK84 I Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-01118 and SUBTPM19518 Page 7 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study Addendum. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. 1 Signature: i L IV � ,� / Date: /_l Print Name and Title:f,��1�� �,(n�� /�����G ����� y,,��r�,���✓ • Item IJK85 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA i DEC 19 2013 RECEIVED - PLANNING NOISE IMPACT STUDY 8Tx STREET & VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA A-(%C i a 40 Tung-chen Chung, Ph.D., INCE'B and ertiBed LSA December 2013 Item IJK86 NOISE IMPACT STUDY 8TH STREET & VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: DCT Industrial 12 Corporate Plaza,Suite 150 Newport Beach,California 92660 Prepared by: LSA Associates, Inc. 20 Executive Park,Suite 200 Irvine,California 926144731 (949)553-0666 LSA Project No.DIT1302 LSA December 2o13 Item IJK87 i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION................................:.................................................................................................1 ProjectLocation.........:........................:............................................................................................1 ProjectDescription:.........................................................................................................................1 Methodology Related to Noise Impact Assessment........................................................................1 CHARACTERISTICS OF SOUND.......................................................................................................4 Measurement of Sound....................................................................................................................4 Physiological Effects of Noise..................................................................:................:.....................5 Vibration...........................................................................................................................................8 EXISTING CONDITIONS....................................................................................................................9 Overview of the Existing Noise Environment.................................................................................9 Existing Traffic Noise......................... ...................................9 ....... ...... Thresholds of Significance:..:.............:........................::..................................................................9 Existing Noise-Sensitive Land Uses in the Project Vicinity..........................................:...............l l IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES..................................................................................:.12 Short-Term Construction-Related Impacts....................................................................................12 Long-Term Traffic Noise Impacts.................................................................................................14 Long-Term Stationary Noise Impacts...........................:................................................................18 MitigationMeasures..............................................:.........................................................................20 REFERENCES.....................................................................................................................................21 FIGURES Figure1:Project Location......................................................................................................................2 Figure2: Site Plan...................:..............................................................................................................3 TABLES Table A:Definitions of Acoustical Terms..........................................................................:..................6 Table B:Common Sound Levels and Their Noise Sources...............................:...................................7 Table C:Land Use Compatibility for Exterior Community Noise.........................................................8 Table D:Existing Traffic Noise Levels................................................................................................10 Table E:RCNM Default Noise Emission Reference Levels and Usage Factors.................................13 Table F:Existing Plus Project Traffic Noise Levels............................................................................15 Table G:Opening Year without Project Traffic Noise Levels.............................................................16 Table H:Opening Year Plus Project Traffic Noise Levels..................................................................17 Table 1: Measured Parking Lot Activity Noise Levels.........................................................................19 APPENDIX A:FNWA HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL PRINTOUT'"" P:1D1T1302Vdoise.dowcal2/18/13u 1 Item IJK88 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. NOISE IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER 3011 STS STREET t VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA • 8TH STREET & VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL INTRODUCTION This Noise Impact Study has been prepared to evaluate the potential noise impacts and necessary mitigation for the 80'Street&Vineyard Avenue Industrial development project in the City of Rancho Cucamonga(City),San Bernardino County(County),California. Project Location The proposed project is a revised industrial development located at the comer of 8t°Street and Vineyard Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,SanBernardino County.Figure 1 shows the project location. Project Description The project site is currently approved for nine industrial buildings and surface parking.The project will construct three industrial buildings instead of the approved nine industrial buildings.The total proposed revised building square footage will be 1,698 square feet(sf)less than the previously approved building square footage and one fewer dock door than previously proposed. The proposed project site plan is illustrated on Figure 2.As the site plan illustrates,access to the site is provided at 8t°Street from the north and 7`b Street from the south. The proposed project is consistent with the current General Plan designation and will not require a General Plan amendment. Methodology Related to Noise Impact Assessment Evaluation of noise impacts associated with the proposed project includes the following; • Determining the short-term noise impacts on off-site noise-sensitive uses; • Determining the long-term noise impacts,including vehicular traffic,on off-site noise-sensitive uses,and on-site stationary noise sources on existing off-site noise-sensitive uses;and • Determining the required mitigation measures to reduce long-term,project-related noise impacts from all noise sources. • PADrr13021Noise.docx«12/18/13» 1 Item IJK89 Oy Q `o° ho EataelaSt E 01 Ct 4 rye r Ectasia olhili HNd < Red 1ttD _ -. - — - Counifl 68:.. Fooihip BNd ? • --'-"- -------- -- -'6i Foothi • — foolhlllBlvd- t an Sr ` H+mP�lfeS�� - V oeva n st Z D - Ckull Ir -'' AvarodAVgar � .,, - �' aHeVajar c._ frtantSt _ }�� ' now Nwy �._. Arran Rk Anow_Rb ° Arrow ' L:�. c d Sxi`iaSt - • ,.,' ` _ < 38003 3T • 9 f llh-SI V y ;. _8th St. S; E s1431l MCId•liy Sl; -- Bowan 31 ' ° > PROJECT a =m t _.J < J SITE x C?a17••S2 MIT*#31 t FarmBIY¢ FMaA BF/b _ f�f 7MMR Yi Maln 3(.: - ►1�t Mann 31 .. y3t £tth3t . . Etta St '' ? E DNvt3I ;! t tHigatmlfLt. + t v • -. �_ £71h 31 - ,'� f 7th St 71a.31 ..- • r > Cyn•rcnSf tamtraa3[" 4 C • ° i o i ERaat11rL_ Doubt"3) 4Y DWb"S- � • � c � z EAlondrabY- > En St - 6N S2 - -- o • z „ AaiAill _ £U o1my Dr o E HawnlarAa SY E - EDDhnieDn+Ct.. v DL • E5th31 I ESIIfSt d Z EYakSt a EXa1aSIE {R4 H2akDI r X . rinc•toa St - '�.� E➢rrr4caton31 Z i - R *y>diad x { l.s.::wK, aS'=' a - L {1M St pi Of S I .t_. t t- sowoodCCh, 11 Ld Ak a ,1 rte. - r - ID n ,r le lntaraErvire E GSI. `a R E Conte Mog s � 1 o z 1 ✓'� i '''i i 1, i 1 F Hdt gird J ,+ rl m L S A FIGURE 1 t Y 0 1000 2000 F L:L'T 3th& Vineyard Technical Analysis SOURCE:ESRI Project Location 1:\D1T1302\G\[.ocation.cdr(12/5/13) Item IJK90 --— – –8th-St– i .1 I SSAGO.� 1;11 II i — � 1 IC , I AIS 1 ' 1 I I, 111 I i 1 (I i rf i JJ - • - - ^1 � I i � T 20C ' l— ooms ! » ad I , ---- — 71h-St L S A FIGURE 2 N o loo zoo 8th& Kneyard Technical Analysis FFP7 Site Plan • 1:1D1T1 OZOSitePhac&(12/5/13) Item IJK91 LSA ASSOCIATES. INC. DECEMBER 2013NOISE IMPACT STUDY ITS STREET&VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA CHARACTERISTICS OF SOUND Noise is usually defined as unwanted sound.Noise consists of any sound that may produce physiological or psychological damage and/or interfere with communication,work,rest,recreation, and sleep. To the human ear,sound has two significant characteristics:pitch and loudness.Pitch is generally an annoyance,while loudness can affect the ability to hear.Pitch is the number of complete vibrations, or cycles per second,of a wave resulting in the tone's range from high to low.Loudness is the strength of a sound that describes a noisy or quiet environment and is measured by the amplitude of the sound wave.Loudness is determined by the intensity of the sound waves combined with the reception characteristics of the human ear. Sound intensity refers to how hard the sound wave strikes an object,which in tum produces the sound's effect.This characteristic of sound can be precisely measured with instruments. The analysis of a project defines the noise environment of the project area in terms of sound intensity and its effect on adjacent sensitive land uses. Measurement of Sound Sound intensity is measured through the A-weighted scale to correct for the relative frequency response of the human ear.That is,an A-weighted noise level de-emphasizes low and very high frequencies of sound similar to the human ear's de-emphasis of these frequencies.Unlike linear units, such as inches or pounds,decibels(dB)are measured on a logarithmic scale representing points on a sharply rising curve. For example, 10 dB is 10 times more intense than I dB,20 dB is 100 times more intense,and 30 dB is 1,000 times more intense.Thirty dB represents 1,000 times as much acoustic energy as 1 dB.The decibel scale increases as the square of the change,representing the sound pressure energy.A sound as soft as human breathing is about 10 times greater than 0 dB.The decibel system of measuring sound gives a rough connection between the physical intensity of sound and its perceived loudness to the human ear.A 10 dB increase in sound level is perceived by the human ear as only a doubling of the loudness of the sound.Ambient sounds generally range from 30 dB(very quiet)to 100 dB(very loud). Sound levels are generated from a source,and their decibel level decreases as the distance from that source increases. Sound dissipates exponentially with distance from the noise source.For a single point source,sound levels decrease approximately 6 dB for each doubling of distance from the source.This drop-off rate is appropriate for noise generated by stationary equipment. If noise is produced by a line source,such as highway traffic or railroad operations,the sound decreases 3 dB for each doubling of distance in a hard site environment.Line source noise in a relatively flat environment with absorptive vegetation decreases 4.5 dB for each doubling of distance. There are many ways to rate noise for various time periods, but an appropriate rating of ambient noise affecting humans also accounts for the annoying effects of sound.The equivalent continuous sound levelthe total-sound energy(L�'is oftime-varying noise over a sample penod:"Iiowev'er;tTie" predominant rating scales for human communities in the State of California are the LCq and community noise equivalent level(CNEL)or the day-night average level(L&)based on A-weighted decibels(dBA).CNEL is the time-varying noise over a 24-hour period,with a 5 dBA weighting PAD1r13021NoiseAc=((12/18/13)) 4 Item IJK92 LSA ASSOCIATE!. INC. NOISE IYPACT STUDY DECEMBER !01! A"STREET 4 VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA • factor applied to the hourly Leq for noises occurring from 7:00 p.m.to 10:00 p.m.(defined as relaxation hours)and a 10 dBA weighting factor applied to noise occurring from 10:00 p.m.to 7:00 a.m.(defined as sleeping hours).L&is similar to the CNEL scale but without the adjustment for events occurring during the evening hours.CNEL and Ld are within 1 dBA of each other and are normally exchangeable. The City uses the L&noise scale for long-term noise impact assessment. Other noise rating scales of importance when assessing the annoyance factor include the maximum noise level(L...J,which is the highest exponential time-averaged sound level that occurs during a stated time period.The noise environments discussed in this analysis for short-term noise impacts are specified in terms of maximum levels denoted by Lam,,,.L.reflects peak operating conditions and addresses the annoying aspects of intermittent noise. It is often used together with another noise scale, or noise standards in terms of percentile noise levels,in noise ordinances for enforcement purposes. For example,the L10 noise level represents the noise level exceeded 10 percent of the time during a stated period.The L50 noise level represents the median noise level.Half the time the noise level exceeds this level,and half the time it is less than this level.The L90 noise level represents the noise level exceeded 90 percent of the time and is considered the background noise level during a monitoring period.For a relatively constant noise source,the Lq and L5o are approximately the same. Noise impacts can be described in three categories.The fust is audible impacts that refer to increases in noise levels noticeable to humans.Audible increases in noise levels generally refer to a change of 3 dB or greater because this level has been found to be barely perceptible in exterior environments. The second category,potentially audible,refers to a change in the noise level between 1 and 3 dB. This range of noise levels has been found to be noticeable only in laboratory environments.The last • category is changes in noise levels of less than 1 dB,which are inaudible to the human ear.Only audible changes in existing ambient or background noise levels are considered potentially significant. Physiological Effects of Noise Physical damage to human hearing begins at prolonged exposure to noise levels higher than 85 dBA. Exposure to high noise levels affects the entire system,with prolonged noise exposure in excess of 75 dBA increasing body tensions,thereby affecting blood pressure and functions of the heart and the nervous system. In comparison,extended periods of noise exposure above 90 dBA would result in permanent cell damage. When the noise level reaches 120 dBA,a tickling sensation occurs in the human ear even with short-term exposure. This level of noise is called the threshold of feeling.As the sound reaches 140 dBA,the tickling sensation is replaced by the feeling of pain in the ear. This is called the threshold of pain.A sound level of 160 to 165 dBA will result in dizziness or loss of equilibrium. The ambient or background noise problem is widespread and generally more concentrated in urban areas than in outlying less developed areas. Table A lists"Definitions of Acoustical Terms,"and Table B shows"Common Sound Levels and Their Noise Sources."Table C shows"Land Use Compatibility for Exterior Community Noise" recommended by the California Department of Health,Office of Noise Control. ® PADIT1302\Noise.doex«12/18/13» 5 Item IJK93 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. ' DECEMBER 8015 NOISE IMPACT STUDY I"STREET&VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Table A: Definitions of Acoustical Terms Term Definitions Decibel,dB A unit of measurement that denotes the ratio between two quantities that are Proportional to power,the number of decibels is 10 times the logarithm(to the base 10)of this ratio. , Frequency,Hz Of a function periodic in time,the number of times that the quantity repeats itself in 1 second i.e: number of cycles per second . A-Weighted Sound The sound level obtained by use of A-weighting.The A-weighting filter Level,dBA de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the frequency response of the human ear and correlates well with subjective reactions to noise.All sound levels in this report are A-weighted,unless reported otherwise. Lol,Ljo,L50,1,9 The fast A-weighted noise levels that are equaled or exceeded by a fluctuating sound level 1 percen10 percent,50 percent.and.90 percent of a.stated time period. Equivalent The level of a steady sound that,in a stated time period and at a stated location,has Continuous Noise the same A-weighted sound energy as the time varying sound. Level L Community Noise The 24-hour A-weighted average sound level from midnight to midnight,obtained Equivalent Level, after the addition of 5 dBA to sound levels occurring in the evening from 7:00 p.m.to CNEL 10:00 p.m.and after the addition of 10 dBA to sound levels occurring in the night between 10:00 p.m.and 7:00 a.m. Day/Night Noise The 24-hour A-weighted average sound level from midnight to midnight,obtained Level,L& after the addition of 10 dBA to sound levels occurring in the night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. L..Lw. The maximum and minimum A-weighted sound levels measured on a sound level meter,during a designated time interval using fast time averaging. Ambient Noise Level The all-encompassing noise associated with a given environment at a specified time, usually a composite of sound from many sources at many directions,near and far,no articular sound is dominant. Intrusive The noise that intrudes over and above the existing ambient noise at a given location. The relative intrusiveness of a sound depends upon its amplitude,duration,frequency, and time of occurrence and tonal or informational content as well as the prevailing ambient noise level. Source:Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control(1991). PADIT13021Noise.docx«12/18/13u 6 Item IJK94 LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. DICEMEER soilNOISE IMPACT STUDY ST°STREET !VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA • Table B: Common Sound Levels and Their Noise Sources A-Weighted Sound Noise Subjective Noise Source Level in Decibels EnvironmentsEvaluations Near Jet Engine 140 Deafening 128 times as loud Civil Defense Siren 130 Threshold of Pain 64 times as loud Hard Rock Band 120 1 Threshold of Feelin 32 times as loud Accelerating Motorcycle at a Few 110 Very Loud 16 times as loud Feet Awa Pile Driver,Noisy Urban Street/ 100 Very Loud 8 times as loud flea City Traffic Ambulance Siren;Food Blender 95 Very Loud Garbage Disposal 90 very Loud 4 times as loud Freight Cars;Living Room Music 85 Loud Pneumatic Drill;Vacuum Cleaner 80 Loud 2 times as loud Busy Restaurant 75 Moderate) Loud Near Freeway Auto Traffic 70 Moderate) Loud Average Office 60 uiet One-half as loud Suburban Street 55 .';et Light Traffic;Soft Radio Music in 50 Quiet One-quarter as loud Apartment Large Transformer 45 iet Average Residence without Stereo 40 Faint One-eighth as loud Playing Soft Whisper 30 Faint • Rustling Leaves 20 Ve Faint Human Bre ihing 10 Ve Faint Threshold of Hearin 0 Ve Faint Source:Compiled by LSA Associates,Inc.(1998). ® P:1DIT13021Noise.docx((12/18/13)) 7 Item IJK95 LDA ASSOCIATES, INC. DBOBYBSR tot! OISE IMPACT STUDY ITS STREET S VINEYARD NAVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OP RANC80 CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA I Table C:Land Use Compatibility for Exterior Community Noise ;Ranor CNEL dB Land Use Cat o IIII IV Passivel used o en aces 5055-70 70+ Auditoriums concert halls am hitheaters 45-5065-70 70+ Residential:low-density single-family,duplex,mobile 50-5570-75 75+ homes Residential:Inultifamil 50-6070-75 75+ Transient lod in :motels hotels 50-6070-80 80+ Schools libraries churches ho ital nursin homes 50-6070-80 80+ Actively used open spaces:playgrounds,neighborhood 50-6767-73 73+arks Golf courses,riding stables,water recreation, 50-7.070-80 80+ cemeteries Office buildings,business commercial and rofessional 50-67 67-75 75+ Industrial manufacturing,utilities ! 'culture 5040 1 70-75 75+ — Source:Office of Noise Control,California Department of Health(1976). Noise Range 1—Normally Acceptable:Specified land use is satisfactory,based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction,without any special noise insulation requirements. Noise Range 11—Conditionally Acceptable:New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features are included in the design. Conventional construction,but with closed windows and fresh airsupply systems or air-conditioning,will normally suffice. Noise Range 1II—Normally Unacceptable:New construction or.development should generally be discouraged.If new construction or development does proceed,a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. . Noise Range IV--Clearly Unacceptable:New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. CNEL=Community Noise Equivalent Level OB=decibels L&=day-night average level Vibration Vibration refers to groundborne noise and perceptible motion.Groundbotne vibration is almost exclusively a concern inside buildings and is rarely perceived as a problem outdoors,where the motion may be discernable,but without the effects associated with the shaking of a building there is less adverse reaction.Vibration energy propagates from a source through intervening soil and rock layers to the foundations of nearby buildings. The vibration then propagates from the foundation throughout the remainder of the structure.Building vibration may be perceived by the occupants as motion of building surfaces,rattling of items on shelves or hanging on walls,or a low-frequency rumbling noise.The rumbling noise is caused by the vibrating walls,floors,and ceilings radiating sound waves.Building damage is not a factor for normal development projects with the occasional exception of blasting and pile driving during construction.Annoyance from vibration often occurs when the vibration exceeds the threshold of perception by 10 dB or less.This is an order of magnitude below the damage threshold for normal buildings. PADIT13021Noise.d=(12/18/13)) 8 Item IJK96 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. NOISE IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER 3013 I"STREET R VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA • Typical sources of groundborne vibration are construction activities(e.g.,blasting,pile driving,and operating heavy-duty earthmoving equipment),steel-wheeled trains,and occasional traffic on rough roads.Problems with groundborne vibration and noise from these sources are usually localized to areas within approximately 100 feet(ft)from the vibration source,although there are examples of groundborne vibration causing interference out to distances greater than 200 ft(Federal Transit Administration 2006). When roadways are smooth,vibration from traffic,even heavy trucks,is rarely perceptible.It is assumed for most projects that the roadway surface will be smooth enough that groundborne vibration from street traffic will not exceed the impact criteria;however,project construction could result in groundborne vibration that could be perceptible and annoying. Groundborne noise is not likely to be a problem because noise arriving via the normal airborne path usually will be greater than groundborne noise. EXISTING CONDITIONS Overview of the Existing Noise Environment The primary existing noise sources in the project area are transportation facilities.Traffic on 8'b Street, Vineyard Avenue,and other local streets is a steady source of ambient noise. Existing Traffic Noise Existing traffic noise levels in the study area are listed in Table D.The Federal Highway • Administration(FHWA)highway traffic noise prediction model(FHWA RD-77-108)was used to evaluate highway traffic-related noise conditions along the local roadways in the project vicinity.This model requires various parameters,including traffic volumes,vehicle mix,vehicle speed,and roadway geometry to compute typical equivalent noise levels during daytime,evening,and nighttime hours. The existing average daily traffic(ADT)volumes for 8`h Street,Vineyard Avenue,and 7'h Street were obtained from the traffic study conducted by LSA Associates, Inc.(LSA)for the original project on this site(LSA,February 2008). The resultant noise levels were weighted and summed over 24-hour periods to determine the Ld.values.As shown in Table D,traffic noise along roadway segments in the project vicinity is generally moderate along 8'Street, 6"Street,4'b Street,7'b Street,and Hellman Avenue and high along Vineyard Avenue and Archibald Avenue. Thresholds of Significance A project will normally have a significant effect on the environment related to noise if it will substantially increase the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community in which it is located.The applicable noise standards governing the project site are the criteria in the City's Noise Element of the General Plan and its Development Code Performance Standards. • PADIT13021Noise.dom«12/18/13» 9 Item IJK97 LSA.ASSOCIATES, INC. NOISE IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER Sol$ 8"STREET&VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA Table D:Existing Traffic Noise Levels Ld•(dBA)50 ft from Centerline Centerline Centerline Centerline of to 70 Ld, to 65 L& to 60 Outermost Roadway Segment ADT ft ft ft Lane 891 St west of Vineyard Ave. 6000 <50 <50 55 59.9 8 St.between Vineyard Ave.and Hellman Ave. 4,700 <50 <50 <50 58.9 8 St between Hellman Ave.and Archibald Ave. 4,200 <50 <50 <50 58.4 8 St.east of Archibald Ave. 3 400 <50 <50 <50 57.5 St west of Hellman Ave. 820 <50 <.50 <50. 51.3 77'S-t—east of Hellman Ave. 1,900 <50 1 <50 <50 54.9 St west of.Hellman Ave. 6,900 <50 <50 61 60.5 6 St east of Hellman Ave. 7,300 <50 <50 63 60.8 4 St.west of Vineyard Ave. 13,600 <50 88 184 66.2 4 St.east of Vineyard Ave. 15 400 <50 95 200 66.8 Vineyard Ave.north of 8 St. 21,300 58 117 247 68.2 Vineyard Ave.between 8 St and 4 St 24,100 62 126 268 68.7 Vineyard Ave.south of r St 30 200 71 146 311 69.7 Hellman Ave.north of r St 6,000 <50 <50 55 59.9 Hellman Ave.between r St and Tn St 5 700 <50 <50 105 62.5 Hellman Ave.between 7m St and Wb St 5,200 <50 <50 50 59.3 Hellman Ave.south of St 3,900 <50 <50 .550 58.1 Archibald Ave.north of r St 23,000 61 123 260 68.5 Archibald Ave.south of r St 23 00 1 61 124 262 68.6 Source:LSA Associates,Inc.(December 2013). Notes: Traffic noise within 50 ft of the roadway centerline should be evaluated with site-specific information. 2008 tragic data adjusted by assuming a 2 percent per-annum growth. Modeled using the"Soft'setting and the Orange County default fleet percentages. ADT=average daily traffic ft=feet dBA=A-weighted decibels L&=day-night average level Noise Element of the General Plan.The objectives and policies of this noise element are aimed at protecting the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga from excessive noise levels that interfere with daily routine and comfort.Applicable policies are summarized as follows: • The City shall consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific plans and when reviewing development proposals. • The City shall analyze in detail the potential noise impacts of any actions that the City may take or act upon that could significantly alter noise levels in the community. • The City shall encourage proper site planning to reduce noise level impacts.Any action that the City makes,takes,or acts upon that could significantly alter and reduce noise levels in the community should be encouraged. The City shall consider the use of noise barriers or walls to reduce;poise ieveis frtoltT JPntld°"­"""' transportation noise sources and industrial sources. • The City shall establish noise abatement policies for each new road and for those areas of the City where future land uses would be incompatible with the noise environment. P:\DIT1302\Noiscdom«12/18/13)) 10 Item IJK98 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. NOISE IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER i01i STS STREET S.VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA • The City also acknowledges in its Noise Element that 60 dBA L&is commonly accepted as the "cutoff'point in terms of noise measurements beyond which noise levels would be potentially disturbing and annoying.This level is considered"normally acceptable"for all land uses and is consistent with State and federal guidelines regarding protection of the noise environment. Therefore,60 dBA L&is considered to be the City's exterior noise standard for noise-sensitive land uses such as residences,schools,hospitals,and places of worship.For industrial uses,an exterior noise level up to 75 dBA L&is normally acceptable. Development Code.It is stated in the City's Development Code,Section 17.02.120,Noise Abatement,that all single-and multiple-family residential properties are categorized as NOISE ZONE I,and all commercial properties are categorized as NOISE ZONE Il. It is stated in the City's Development Code, in Sections 17.02.120 and 17.08.080,Performance Standards, in NOISE ZONE I,that all construction,maintenance,or demolition activities within the City's boundary shall be limited to the hours between 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.,Monday through Saturday,excluding national holidays. Section 17.02.120 further states that such noise levels shall not exceed the noise standards of 65 dBA plus the following limits: • Basic noise level for a cumulative period of no more than 15 minutes in any I hour • Basic noise level plus 5 dBA for a cumulative period of no more than 10 minutes in any 1 hour • • Basic noise level plus 10 dBA for a cumulative period of no more than 5 minutes in any 1 hour • Basic noise level plus 15 dBA at any time In Section 17.08.080,maximum allowable exterior noise levels in residential areas are set at 55 dBA between 10:00 p.m.and 7:00 a.m.and at 60 dBA between 7:00 a.m.and 10:00 p.m.Maximum allowable interior noise levels for residential uses are set at 40 dBA between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. and at 45 dBA between 7:00 a.m.and 10:00 p.m. It shall be unlawful for any person at any location in the City to create any noise or to allow the creation of any noise that causes the noise level to exceed the residential noise standards stated above. Each of the noise limits above shall be reduced 5 dBA for noise consisting of impulse or simple tone noise. For planning purposes,the 24-hour average sound levels,Ld.,are roughly equivalent to L.Q measurements plus 5 dBA when traffic is the dominant noise source(Office of Noise Control, 1976:21). Existing Noise-Sensitive Land Uses in the Project Vicinity There are existing residential uses to the west and south across Demens Channel,approximately 200 ft from the project site,and southeast of the project site beyond 7h Street,more than 300 ft away. Existing industrial and office buildings are located to the east and north of the project site. ® PADrr1302\Noise.d=«12/18/13» 11 Item IJK99 i LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. DE CENSBR 8818 OISE IMPACT STUDY STs STREET S.VINEYARD NAVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Short-Term Construction-Related Impacts Short-term noise impacts would be associated with the excavation,grading,and erection of buildings on site during construction of the proposed project.Construction-related short-term noise levels would be higher than existing ambient noise levels in the project area today,but would no longer occur once construction of the project is completed. Two types of short-term noise impacts could occur during construction of the proposed project.First, construction crew commutes and the transport of construction equipment and materials.to the site for the proposed project would incrementally increase noise levels on access roads leading to the site. Although there would be a relatively high single-event noise exposure potential causing intermittent noise nuisance(passing trucks at 50 ft would generate up to a maximum of 87 dBA),the effect on longer-term(hourly or daily)ambient noise levels would be small.Therefore,short-term construction-related impacts associated with worker commutes and equipment transport to the project site would be less than significant. . The second type of short-term noise impact is related to noise generated during excavation,grading, and building erection.Construction is completed in discrete steps,each of which has its own mix of equipment and,consequently,its own noise characteristics.These various sequential phases would change the character of the noise generated on site,and therefore the noise levels surrounding the site, as construction progresses.Despite the variety in the type and size of construction equipment, similarities in the dominant noise sources and patterns of operation allow construction-related noise ranges to be categorized by work phase. Table E lists typical construction equipment noise levels recommended for noise impact assessments based on a distance of 50 ft between the equipment and a noise receptor,taken from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model(RCNM;FHWA Highway Construction Noise Handbook, August 2006). Typical noise levels range up to 91 dBA L.at 50 ft during the noisiest construction phases. The site preparation phase,which includes excavation and grading of the site,tends to generate the highest noise levels because the noisiest construction equipment is earthmoving equipment. Other construction phases would result in lower noise levels in areas adjacent to the project site and, therefore,would experience fewer noise impacts than the site preparation phase. Earthmoving equipment includes excavating machinery such as backfillers,bulldozers,draglines,and front loaders.Earthmoving and compacting equipment includes compactors,scrapers,and graders. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve 1 or 2 minutes of full-power operation followed by 3 or 4 minutes at lower power settings. Construction of the proposed project is expected to require the use of earthmovers,bulldozers,and water and pickup trucks.This equipment would be used on,site. Based.on the information in Table E, the iiiaximum noise level generated by each scraper on site is assumed to be 84 dBA L.at 50 ft from the scraper.Each bulldozer would also generate 82 dBA L..at 50 ft.The maximum noise level generated by water and pickup trucks is approximately 76 dBA L..at 50 ft from,these vehicles.The equipment would be spread out over the active construction area,so not every piece of equipment is ROIT1302\Noise.dom a12/18/13N 12 Item IJK100 LSA ASSOCIATED, INC. NOISE IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER 30IS 6"STREET t VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA • Table E: RCNM Default Noise Emission Reference Levels and Usage Factors Spec. Actual Number of Acoustical 721.560 L,n Measured Actual Data Impact Usage at 50 ft L..at 50 ft Samples Equipment Descri tion Device? Factor dBA slow dBA slow Count All other Equipment>5 HP No 50 85 N/A 0 Auger Drill Rig No 1 20 85 1 84 1 36 Backhoe No 40 80 78 372 Chainsaw No 20 85 84 46 Compactor and No 20 80 83 57 Compressor air No 40 80 78 18 Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 85 79 40 Concrete Pump Truck No 20 82 81 30 Crane No 16 85 81 405 Dozer No 40 85 82 55 Dump Truck No 40 84 76 31 Excavator No 40 85 81 170 Flatbed Truck No 40 84 74 4 Front End Loader No 40 80 79 96 Generator No 50 82 81 19 Generator <25 kVA,VMS Signs) No 50 70 73 74 Grader I No 40 85 N/A 0 Grapple on backhoe No 40 85 1 • Jackhammer Yes 20 85 133 Man Lift No 20 85 23 Mounted Impact Hammer(hoe ram Yes 20 90 212 Pavement Scarifier No 20 85 2 Paver No 50 85 9 PickupTruck No 40 55 7511l Pneumatic Tools No 50 85 90 Pumps No 50 77 17 Rock Drill No 20 85 81 3 Roller No 20 85 80 16 Scraper No 40 85 84 12 Tractor No 40 84 N/A 0 Vacuum Excavator ac-Truck No 40 1 85 85 149 Vacuum Street Swe er No 10 80 82 lg Vibratory Pile Driver No 20 95 101 44 Warning Hom No 5 85 1 12 Welder/Torch No 40 73 74 g Source:FHWA Highway Construction Noise Handbook(August 2006). dBA=A-weighted decibels kVA=kilovolt-amperes ft=foot/feet Ln,.=maximum instantaneous noise level ft-lb/blow=foot-pounds per blow N/A=Not Applicable HP=horsepower VMS=variable message sign • PADrr1302\Noise.d=((12/18/13)) 13 Item IJK101 LSA ASSOCIATES. INC. NOISE IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER 30111 1"STREET VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA operating next to each other,and therefore would not be collectively considered a point source.When several pieces of equipment are operating close to each other,the combined noise from these pieces of equipment can be viewed as from a point source for receptors that are at least 100 ft away.Based on logarithmic scale summation,each doubling of the sound sources with equal strength increases the noise level by 3 dBA.Assuming that up to three pieces of construction equipment operate at close range and with some distance from the other equipment,the worst-case combined noise level for receptors near this active construction area during this site preparation phase of construction would be 87 dBA L,.at a distance of 50 ft from the active construction area. There are existing residences approximately 200 ft to the west,southwest,and southeast of the project site.These closest residences may be exposed to construction noise up to 75 dBA L.intermittently from the on-site construction activity when it occurs near the project boundary during project construction.However,vehicular traffic on 8b Street and Vineyard Avenue would generate comparable or higher traffic noise and mask the on-site construction noise.Construction activity on the project site during the site preparation phase and other construction phases would not result in noise levels exceeding the ambient noise levels in the project vicinity.Construction activity away from the project boundary would result in lower construction noise and would not affect the off-site residences.Therefore,compliance with the construction hours specified in the City's Noise Ordinance would reduce the construction noise impacts to less than significant levels. Long-Term Traffic Noise Impacts The FHWA highway traffic noise.prediction model(FHWA RD-77-108)was used to evaluate traffic- related noise conditions in the vicinity of the project site.The resultant noise levels were weighted and summed over a 24-hour period in order to determine the Ld,values.Ld.contours are derived through a series of computerized iterations to isolate the 60,65,and 70 dBA Ld,contours for traffic noise levels in the project area.Average daily traffic volumes for the existing,existing plus project, opening year baseline,and opening year plus project scenarios were obtained from the traffic study (LSA,February 2008)conducted for this project.Tables F,.G,and H list the traffic noise levels for the existing plus project,opening year baseline,and opening year plus project scenarios,respectively. Tables F and H show that implementation of the proposed project would result in relatively minor changes in traffic noise levels along roadway segments in the project vicinity.The highest project- related increase in traffic noise would be 3.2 dBA along 7`h Street west of Hellman Avenue,where the cumulative traffic noise levels would remain low and the 70,65,and 60 dBA L&noise levels would all remain confined within the roadway right-of-way.Along all other roadway segments analyzed, project-related traffic noise level increases would be 0.8 dBA or less for the existing plus project and opening year with project scenarios.This range of traffic.noise level increase is not perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment.Therefore,no significant traffic noise impacts on off-site land uses would occur as a result of the proposed project. Proposed on-site industrial buildings would not be exposed to traffic noise exceeding the normally acceptable noise level of 75 dBA Ld,for industrial land uses.No mitigation measures would-be - required. PMU1302\Noisedom((12118/13)) 14 Item IJK102 LSA ASSOCIATED. INC. NOISE IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER 3015 STS STREET L VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA Table F:Existing Plus Project Traffic Noise Levels Increase Ld, L&(dBA) (dBA) 50 ft from 50 ft from Centerline Centerline Centerline Centerline of Centerline of to 70 La, to 65 Ld, to 60 La, Outermost Outermost Roadway S ent ADT ft ft ft Lane Lane 8 St.west of Vineyard Ave. 6,200 <50 <50 57 60.1 0.2 8 St.between Vineyard Ave.and 5,700 <50 <50 54 59.7 0.8 Hellman Ave. 8 St.between Hellman Ave.and 4,800 <50 <50 <50 59.0 0.6 Archibald Ave. 8 Street east of Archibald Ave. 3,600 <50 <50 <50 57.7 0.2 Lr St.west of Hellman Ave. 1,700- <50 <50 <50 54.5 3.2 7 St.east of Hellman Ave. 1.900 <50 <50 <50 54.9 0.0 6 St.west of Hellman Ave. 6,900 <50 <50 61 60.5 0.0 6 St.east of Hellman Ave. 7,300 <50 <50 63 60.8 0.0 4 St west of Vineyard Ave. 13 600 <50 88 184 66.2 0.0 4 St.east of Vine and Ave. IS 700 <50 96 202 66.9 0.1 Vine and Ave.north of 8 St. 21 700 59 118 250 68.3 0.1 Vineyard Ave.between 8 St.and 25,100 64 130 276 68.9 p,2 4s'St. Vineyard Ave.south of 4 St. 31 600 73 150 321 69.9 p.2 Hellman Ave.north of Im St. 6,000 <50 <50 55 59.9 0.0 • Hellman Ave.between S St.and 6,000 <50 <50 108 62.7 0.2 7d'St. Hellman Ave.between 7 St.and 5,700 <50 <50 54 59.7 0.4 6a'St. Hellman Ave.south of 6 St. 4,400 <50 <50 <50 58.6 0.5 Archibald Ave.north of 81ft St. 23,200 61 123 262 68.6 0.1 Archibald Ave.south of 8 St. 23,500 61 124 264 68.6 0.0 Source:LSA Associates,Inc.(December 2013). Notes: Traffic noise within 50 ft of the roadway centerline should be evaluated with site-specific information. 2008 traffic data adjusted by assuming a 2 percent per annum growth. Modeled using the"Soft'setting and the Orange County default fleet percentages. ADT=average daily traffic dBA=A-weighted decibels ft=feet Ld.=day-night average level ® PADIT1302Waise.docx«12/18/13)) 15 Item IJK103 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. NOISE IMPACT STUDY ' DECEMBER SSI$ ST°STREET A VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA Table G: Opening Year without Project Traffic Noise Levels Ld.(dBA) Centerline Centerline Centerline 50 ft from to to to Centerline of 701.,d. 65.La, 60" Outermost Roadway ent ADT ft ft ft Lane FAve.t.west of Vineyard Ave. 6,100 <50 <50 56 60.0 t.between Vineyard Ave.and Hellman 4,800 <50 <50 <50 59.0 t.between Hellman Ave.and Archibald 4,200 <50 <50 <50 58.4 8 St.east of Archibald Ave. 5,100 <50 <50 <50 59.2 St.west of Hellman Ave. 820 <50 <50 _ <50 51.3 711 St east of Hellman Ave. 1,900 <50 <50 <50 _ 54.9 6 St.west of Hellman Ave. 7,000 <50 <50 61 60.6 6 St.east of Hellman Ave. 7,500 <50. <50 64 60.9 _ _TSt.west of Vineyard Ave. 13,800 <50 89 186 66.3 0 St east of Vineyard Ave. .15 700 <$0 % 202 66.9 Vin aid Ave.north of 8 St 21700 59 118 250 68.3 Vineyard Ave.between 8 St.and 4 St 24,500 63 128 271 68.8 Vineyard Ave.south of 4 St. 30,800 72 148 316 Hellman Ave.north of Wh St. 6100 <50 <50 56 60.0 _ Hellman Ave.between 8 St.and St. 5,800 _ <50 <50 106 62.5 Hellman Ave.between St and St 5,300 <50 <50 51 59.4 Hellman Ave.south of 6 St 4,000 <50 <50 .<50 58.2 Archibald Ave.north of r St 23,900 62 126 267 68.7 Archibald Ave.south of r St 25 000 64 129 . 275 J_68.9 Source:LSA Associates,Inc.(December 2013). Note: Traffic noise within 50 ft of the roadway centerline should be evaluated with site-specific information. 2008 traffic data adjusted by assuming a 2 percent per annum growth. Modeled using the"Soft"setting and the Orange County default fleet percentages. ADT=average daily traffic dBA=A-weighted decibels ft=feet Ld=day-night average level PADIT1302UQoise.dom«12/18/13» 16 Item IJK104 LOA ASSOCIATES, INC. NOISE IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER SOif STI STREET L VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA Table H: Opening Year Plus Project Tragic Noise Levels Increase La, LdI(dBA) (dBA) 50 ft from 50 ft from Centerline Centerline Centerline Centerline of Centerline of to 70 LdI to 65 LdI to 60 LdI Outermost Outermost FRoadwaySegment ADT ft ft ft Lane I Lane 8 St.west of Vineyard Ave. 6,300 <50 <50 57 60.2 0 2 8 St.between Vineyard Ave. 5,800 <50 <50 54 59.8 0.8 and Hellman Ave. 8 St.between Hellman Ave. 4,800 <50 <50 <50 59.0 0.6 and Archibald Ave. 8 St.east of Archibald Ave. 5,200 <50 <50 50 59.3 0.1 St west of Hellman Aae 700 <50 <50 <50 54:5 3.2 St.east of Hellman Av900 <50 <50 <50 54.9 0.0 6 St.west of Hellman A000 <50 <50 61 60.6 0.0 6 St.east of Hellman Av500 <50 <50 64 60.9 0.0 4 St.west.of Vin and A 800 1 <50 89 186 66.3 0.0 4 St.east of Vine and Ave. 16,000 <50 97 205 67.0 0.1 Vineyard Ave.north of 8 St. 22,100 59 119 253 68.4 0.1 Vineyard Ave.between 8 St. 25,600 65 131 279 69.0 0.2 and 0 St. Vine and Ave.south of 4 St. 32,200 74 152 325 70.0 0,2 ® Hellman Ave.north of 81 St. 6,100 <50 <50 56 60.0 0.0 Hellman Ave.between 8 St. 6,100 <50 <50 110 62.8 0.3 and 7t'St. Hellman Ave.between St. 5,800 <50 <50 54 59.8 0.4 and 6`h St. Hellman Ave.south of 6 St. 4,500 <50 Archibald Ave.north of 8 St. 24 000 1 62 126 267 68.7 0.0 Archibald Ave.south of 8 St. 25 200 64 130 276 68.9 0.0 Source:LSA Associates,Inc.(December 2013). Notes: Traffic noise within 50 feet of the roadway centerline should be evaluated with site-specific information. 2008 traffic data adjusted by assuming a 2 percent per annum growth. Modeled using the"Soft'setting and the Orange County default fleet percentages. ADT=average daily traffic dBA=A-weighted decibels ft=feet L&=day-night average level PADIT1302\NoiseAm«12/18/13» . 17 Item IJK105 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. NO182 IMPACT STUDY DECSMRER 2013 OTO STRERT!VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA Long-Term Stationary Noise Impacts Potential long-term stationary noise impacts would be associated primarily with operations on the future on-site industrial uses from rooftop mechanical units,truck delivery,and other activities at the parking lot.These activities are potential point sources of noise that could affect off-site noise- sensitive receptors adjacent to the project site. As noise spreads from a source it loses energy,so the farther away the noise receiver is from the noise source,the lower the perceived noise level would be.Geometric spreading causes the sound level to attenuate or be reduced,resulting in a 6 dBA reduction in the noise level for each doubling of distance from a single point source of noise,such as an idling truck,to the noise-sensitive receptor of concern. Although individual activity may generate relatively high and intermittent noise,when added to the typically lower ambient noise and averaged over a longer period of time,the cumulative noise level would be much lower and would be considered a less than significant impact. An LSA noise specialist conducted ambient noise measurements at a big-box retail(SuperWalmart) store in Poway,California,on July 15 and 16,2010,to document existing delivery truck noise.A short-term noise measurement was conducted near the existing big-box retail store loading area to document the truck noise during delivery and idling activity.The noise measured included both maneuvering and hitchinglunhitching of the trailer from the truck/tractor. When converted from 57.6 dBA Lq at a distance of 150 ft to the nominal distance of 50 ft,the truck noise equals 67 dBA L,q over the measurement period. On-Site Truck Delivery and Loading/Unloading Activities.Delivery trucks for the existing warehouse buildings to the west/northwest of the project site and for the proposed future on-site industrial buildings would result in a maximum noise level similar to noise readings from loading and unloading activities for other projects with similar operations,which generates a.noise level of 75 dBA L.at 50 ft and is used in this analysis.Based on the site plan,it is estimated that the existing residences to the west across the Demens Channel are approximately.200 ft(-12 dBA when compared to the noise level measured at 50 ft)from the nearest loading docks proposed on the project site. Therefore,with the distance divergence noise attenuation,loading/unloading noise would potentially reach up to 63 dBA L.at the ground level of the nearest residences west of the project site. This range of maximum noise levels would not exceed the typical exterior noise standards of 75 dBA I. for any period of time(20 dBA plus the 55 dBA baseline level for exterior noise in residential areas during daytime hours),but would exceed the 60 dBA(daytime noise standard for residential zone) standard at the nearest off-site residences.Although a typical truck unloading process takes an average of 10 to 15 minutes,this maximum noise level occurs in a much shorter period of time(i.e.,a few minutes),as demonstrated in the Poway SuperWalmart delivery truck noise survey conducted by LSA. It is not expected that truck delivery/loading/unloading activities would result in this maximum noise level lasting more than 15 minutes in any hour when it occurs.However,noise associated with loading/unloading activities at the proposed industrial uses would potentially exceed the City's 60 dBA noise standard at the nearest off-site residences to the west/southwest,and result in significant noise impacts to these off-site residential uses.Therefore,noise associated with-truck-delivery/- loading/unloading ith-truck•-delivery/loading/unloading activities at the proposed industrial uses on the project site would potentially result in noise levels exceeding the City's noise standards at the nearest existing off-site residences. Mitigation measures such as noise barriers along the project's western boundary are required. PADrr1302UQoise.dom«12/18/13» 18 Item IJK106 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. NOIBB IMPACT STUDY DECEM8 ER 2011 BTS STREET L VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA • Other Parking Lot Activities.Representative parking activities,such as employees/customers conversing,engine startup,slow-moving vehicles,or car door slamming,would generate approximately 60 to 70 dBA L.at 50 ft.Wieland Associates,Inc.,conducted an ambient noise survey at an existing medical office building on Booth Circle(in the City of Irvine),on the northwest side of the SBC building,on July 18,2006.Table I summarizes the parking lot activity noise levels measured by Wieland Associates,Inc. Table I: Measured Parking Lot Activity Noise Levels Parking Lot Noise Levels at a Distance of 50 ft Noise Scale Vehicle Enterina Paddne Lot Vehicle Leaving Paricing Lot L50 32.5 dBA 34.5 dBA Les 36.0 dBA 38.0 dBA LB 40.5 dBA 40.5 dBA L2 44.0 dBA 43.0 dBA Lm 69.0 dBA 69.0 dBA Source:Wieland Associates,Inc.,July 18.2006. dBA=A-weighted decibels ft=feet L2=noise level exceeded 2 percent of the time during a stated period LB=noise level exceeded 8 percent of the time during a stated period Les=noise level exceeded 25 percent of the time during a stated period Lso=median noise level L,,,,,I=maximum noise level Based on the ambient noise measurement results shown in Table K,it is assumed that the parking lot activity noise levels obtained would be similar to those that will be generated at the proposed industrial uses on the project site. The nearest residences to the west/southwest of the project site would be approximately 200 ft (-12 dBA when compared to the noise level at 50 ft)from the nearest parking area at the on-site industrial uses. With the distance factor,the potential parking lot activity noise levels at the nearest off-site residences would be reduced to 57 dBA L.,I,32 dBA L2,28.5 dBA L8,26 dBA L2S,and 22.5 dBA Lsp.All exterior noise levels at the existing off-site residential units would be below the City's exterior noise standards for residential uses,and no significant noise impacts would occur from off-site parking lot activities.No mitigation measures are required. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment.It is assumed that there will be rooftop heating,ventilating,and air-conditioning(HVAC)units at the proposed on-site industrial buildings,each with a capacity of 4 to 5 tons.According to Noise Control for Buildings and Manufacturing Plants(Bolt,Beranek& Newman 1987),these HVAC units would generate a noise level of up to 89 dBA at 5 ft. It is assumed that all rooftop mechanical(HVAC)equipment would be placed at least 10 ft from the edge of the roof/.parapet-The.roof edgelparapets wouldprovide at least.5 dBA in noise attenuatim for•ground-- u....: .>..�. <.�.., floor receptors.The nearest residences to the west/southwest of the project site are approximately 200 ft from the closest rooftop HVAC units and would receive 32 dBA noise attenuation compared to the noise level at 5 ft.Combining the noise reduction from distance divergence and roof edge/ parapets,noise from the rooftop HVAC units would be reduced to 52 dBA at the nearest off-site • PADIT1302\Noisad=02/18/13» 19 Item IJK107 LSA ASSOCIATES. INC. NOISE IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER SOLS ST$STREET !VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA residences.This range of noise levels is lower than the traffic noise associated with local roadways adjacent to the residences and is below the City's exterior noise standard for residential uses during daytime hours. With the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)-recommended . 12 dBA and 24 dBA exterior-to-interior noise reduction provided by standard building construction in warm-climate areas(including Southern California)for open-and closed-window scenarios, respectively,noise from the rooftop mechanical units would be reduced to 40 dBA and 28 dBA inside the nearest residences to the west/southwest of the project site. These noise levels are much lower than the City's interior noise standards for residential uses.No significant noise impacts would occur from the rooftop mechanical units at the proposed on-site industrial use buildings. Mitigation Measures Construction Impacts.Construction of the proposed project would potentially result in relatively high noise levels and annoyance at the closest residences.The City's Development Code(Sections 17.02.120 and 17.08.080,Performance Standards,in NOISE ZONE I)requires that all construction, maintenance,or demolition activities within the City's boundary shall be limited to the hours between 6:30 a.m.and 8:00 p.m.,Monday through Saturday,excluding national holidays. Section 17.02.120 further states that.such noise levels shall not exceed the noise standards of 65 dBA plus the following limits: • Basic noise level for a cumulative period of no more than 15 minutes in any 1 hour Basic noise level plus 5 dBA for a cumulative period of no more than 10 minutes in any 1 hour Basic noise level plus 10 dBA for a cumulative period of no more than 5 minutes in any I hour Basic noise level plus 15 dBA at any time' Compliance with the City's Development Code,plus implementation of-the following measures, would reduce short-term construction-related noise impacts resulting from the proposed project: During all project site excavation and grading on site,the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment,fixed or mobile,with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers'standards. The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction=related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. • The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan,with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. • The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction .._� �......... .. __. ....- -operations,to avoid-sensitive-times-afthe,day:, .... o .,,�. ..,., ...,,. .... ��. .. ......,...,..�.. ' These are qualitative measures and cannot be quantified. PADIT1302\Noise.dom((12/18/13)) 20 Item IJK108 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. NOISE IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER 2011 1TI STREET R VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA Operations Impact. The following summarizes the recommended mitigation measures for the proposed project: • Along the western project boundary: o A sound wall along the project's northwestern property line with a minimum height of 8 ft above the pad elevation that can be a combination of berms and concrete masonry units (CMUs). REFERENCES Bolt,Beranek&Newman,Noise Control for Buildings and Manufacturing Plants, 1987. City of Rancho Cucamonga,Noise Element and Development Code. Federal Highway Administration, Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model,FHWA RD-77-108, 1977. Federal Highway Administration Roadway Construction Noise Model,RCNM,FHWA Highway Construction Noise Handbook, August 2006. LSA Associates, Inc., Traffic Study for 8h& Vineyard Industrial Project in the City of Rancho ® Cucamonga, February 2008. LSA Associates,Inc., Trip Generation Memo,December 2013.. United States Environmental Protection Agency,Protective Noise Levels,EPA 550/9-79-100. November 1978. P:01T1302\Noise.docx«12/18/13» 21 Item IJK109 LSA ASSOCIATES. INC. NOISE IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER 2018 STM STREET k VINEYARD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPENDIX A FHWA HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL PRINTOUT P:\Drrl302\Ndise.d=«12/18/13» Item IJK110 • TABLE Existing-01 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 8th Street west of Vineyard Ave. NOTES: 8th Street& Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6000 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34. M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 59.94 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 55.5 118.9 • Item IJK111 i TABLE Existing-02 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 8th Street between Vineyard Ave. and.Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 4700 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 58.88 i i DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE •TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 0.0 0.0 0..0 101..1 Item IJK112 TABLE Existing-03 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 8th Street between Hellman Ave. and Archibald Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 4200 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * * Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 58.39 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 0.0 93.8 Item IJK113 i TABLE Existing-04 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 8th Street east of. Archibald Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * .ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3400 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88 .08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0 .66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 57.47 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.6 i Item IJK114 • TABLE Existing-05 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 7th Street west of Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 820 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 51.30 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • Item IJK115 i I TABLE Existing-06 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 7th Street east of Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1900 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34_ M-TRUCKS . 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB). = 54.94 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.5 i Item IJK116 • TABLE Existing-07 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 6th Street west of Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6900 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 60.55 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 60.8 130.5 Item IJK117 TABLE Existing-08 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS i RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT:. 6th Street east of Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS * *' AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7300 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS . 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS_ 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 60.79 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- --_---- 0.0 0.0 63.1 135.5 I Item IJK118 i ® TABLE Existing-09 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 4th Street west of Vineyard Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 13600 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS - 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 66.24 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 88.0 184.0 393.8 Item IJK119 i TABLE Existing-10 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 1.2/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 4th Street east of Vineyard Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 15400 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: ..5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 66.78 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 95.1 199.7 427.7 i i Item 11K120 • TABLE Existing-11 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Vineyard Ave. north of 8th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 21300 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT ® * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.19 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 58.2 116.7 247.2 530.5 Item IJK121 I TABLE Existing-12 j FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS i RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Vineyard Ave.. between 8th Street and 4th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 24100 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 i TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.73 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 62.4 126.3 268.2 575.9 i i i I i I I Item IJK122 ® TABLE Existing-13 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: vineyard Ave. south of 4th Street NOTES: 8th Street & vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 30200 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 69.71 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 71.1 146.1 311.4 669.3 Item IJK123 TABLE Existing-14 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. north of 8th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6000 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 59.94 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn --- ------- 0.0 0.0 55.5 118.9 i Item IJK124 • TABLE Existing-15 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. between 8th Street and 7th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5700 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * * Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 62.47 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 105.0 221.5 Item IJK125 i I TABLE Existing-16 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. between 7th Street and 6th Street NOTES.: 8th Street & vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5200 SPEED (MPH) : 30; GRADE.: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0..19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT` * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 59.32 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 50.5 108.1 I I I I Item IJK126 ® TABLE Existing-17 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. south of 6th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3900 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 58.07 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 0.0 89.3 Item IJK127 i i TABLE Existing-18 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Archibald Ave. north of 8th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing I * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY .TRAFFIC: 23000 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0..19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED .NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL .LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 68.53 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldh 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- 60.8 122.6 260.1 558.3 Item IJK128 • TABLE Existing-19 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Archibald Ave. south of 8th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 23300 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT ® * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.58 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 61.2 123.6 262.3 563.1 Item IJK129 TABLE Existing with Project-01 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 8th Street west of Vineyard Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project i * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6200 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 60.08 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 56.7 121.5 I I Item IJK130 ® TABLE Existing with Project-02 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 8th Street between Vineyard Ave. and Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5700 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 59.72 DISTANCE' (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 53.6 114.9 • Item IJK131 TABLE Existing with Project-03 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 8th Street between Hellman Ave. and Archibald Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project i * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 4800 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 i TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 58.97 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 0.0 102.5 I Item IJK132 ® TABLE Existing with Project-04 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 8th Street east of Archibald Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3600 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT ® * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 57.72 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 0.0 84.7 Item IJK133 i TABLE Existing with Project-05 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 7th Street west of Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS i AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1700 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 54.46 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55-Ldn - - - - - - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 51.6 Item IJK134 TABLE Existing with Project-06 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 7th Street east of Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project Existing with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1900 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT ® * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 54.94 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.5 Item IJK135 TABLE Existing with Project-07 FHWA. ROADWAY NOISE• LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 6th Street west of Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6900 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS . 88.08 9..34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR .TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 60.55 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 60.8 130.5 Item IJK136 ® TABLE Existing with Project-08 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 6th Street east of Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7300 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 60.79 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 0.0 0.0 63.1 135.5 • Item IJK137 TABLE Existing with Project-09 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 4th Street west of Vineyard Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 13600 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 j H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT I * * CALCULATED NOISE .LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 66.24 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 88.0 184.0 393.8 Item IJK138 ® TABLE Existing with Project-10 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 4th Street east of Vineyard Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 15700 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT ® * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS It Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 66.87 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 96.3 202.2 433.2 Item IJK139 TABLE Existing with Project-11 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Vineyard Ave. north of 8th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 21700 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.27 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 58.8 118.1 250.3 537.1 r Item IJK140 ® TABLE Existing with Project-12 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Vineyard Ave. between 8th Street and 4th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 25100 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 .0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT ® * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 68.91 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 63.8 129.7 275.5 591.7 Item IJK141 i TABLE Existing with Project-15 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. between 8th Street and 7th Street NOTES: 8th Street &Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project i * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6000 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5. TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 . M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn .AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 62.69 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 .108.5 229.1 i Item IJK142 ® TABLE Existing with Project-16 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. between 7th Street and 6th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5700 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT ® * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * * Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 59,72 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 53.6 114.9 Item IJK143 i TABLE Existing with Project-17 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. south of 6th Street NOTES: 8th Street. & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 4400 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 i TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 58.59 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 0.0 96.8 • I i I Item IJK144 • TABLE Existing with Project-18 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Archibald Ave. north of 8th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 23200 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 68.56 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 61.0 123.3 261.6 561.5 • Item IJK145 TABLE Existing with Project-19 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Archibald Ave. south. of 8th Street NOTES: 8th Street &Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Existing with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC:.. 23500 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.62 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn. 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 61.5 124.3 263.8 566.3 Item IJK146 TABLE Opening Year w/o Project-01 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 8th Street west of Vineyard Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6100 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 60.01 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 56.1 120.2 Item IJK147 i I. TABLE Opening Year w/o Project-04 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE .LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 8th Street east of. Archibald Ave. NOTES: Sth Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5100 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 59.23 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn. 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 0.0 106.8 j I Item IJK148 ® TABLE Opening Year w/o Project-05 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 7th Street west of Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 820 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT ® * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 51.30 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Item IJK149 l ' TABLE Opening Year w/o Project-06 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 7th Street east of Hellman Ave.. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1900 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: ..5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9..34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 54.94 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.5 i Item IJK150 • TABLE Opening Year w/o Project-07 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 6th Street west of Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7000 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 60.61 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 61.4 131.8 Item IJK151 TABLE Opening; Year w/o Project-08 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS I RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 6th Street east of Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7500 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 60.91 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 .Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 64.3 137.9 i Item IJK152 ® TABLE Opening Year w/o Project-09 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 4th Street west of Vineyard Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 13800 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT ® * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 66.31 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 88.8 185.8 397.6 Item IJK153 I TABLE Opening Year w/o Project-10 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS I RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 4th Street east of Vineyard Ave. NOTES: Sth Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial. Development Project - Opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 15700 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19' H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM- NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (AB) = 66.87 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 96.3 202.2 433.2 Item IA154 ® TABLE Opening Year w/o Project-11 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Vineyard Ave. north of 8th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 21700 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT ® * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 68.27 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 58.8 118.1 250.3 537.1 Item IJK155 i TABLE. Opening Year w/o Project-12 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Vineyard Ave. between 8th Street and 4th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY,TRAFFIC: 24500 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE:. .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT i i * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.80 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO -Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 63.0 127.7 271.2 582.3 i I Item UK156 TABLE Opening Year w/o Project-13 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Vineyard Ave. south of 4th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 30800 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE 'HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 69.79 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 71.9 148.0 315.5 678.1 Item IJK157 i TABLE Opening Year w/o Project-14 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. north of 8th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6100 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: ..5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT j AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 60.01 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 0.0 0.0 56.1 120.2 Item IJK158 • TABLE Opening Year w/o Project-15 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. between 8th Street and 7th Street NOTES: 8th Street. & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5800 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 62.54 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 106.2 224.0 Item IJK159 i TABLE Opening Year w/o Project-16 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. between 7th Street and 6th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5300 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 j ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 59.40 .DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 51.1 109.5 Item IJK160 • TABLE Opening Year w/o Project-17 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. south of 6th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 4000 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 58.18 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 0.0 0.0 0.0 90.9 Item IJK161 TABLE Opening_ Year w/o Project-18 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Archibald Ave. north of Sth.Street .NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year w/o Project I * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 23900 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.69 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 62.1 125.6 266.7 572.7 i Item IJK162 • TABLE Opening Year w/o Project-19 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Archibald Ave. south of 8th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year w/o Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 25000 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.89 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 63.7 129.3 274.8 590.1 • Item IJK163 TABLE Opening Year with Project-01 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 8th Street west of Vineyard Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6300 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS ! 1.65 0..19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT I * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 60..15 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 57.3 122.8 Item IJK164 • TABLE Opening Year with Project-02 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 8th Street between Vineyard Ave. and Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5800 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 59.79 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 0.0 0.0 54.2 116.3 Item IJK165 TABLE Opening Year with Project-03 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS i RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 8th Street between Hellman Ave. and Archibald Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 4800 SPEED (MPH) :. 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 58.97 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 0.0 102.5 i i Item IJK166 TABLE Opening Year with Project-04 ® FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 8th Street east of Archibald Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5200 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 59.32 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 0.0 0.0 50.5 108.1 • Item IJK167 TABLE Opening Year with Project-05 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS i RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 7th Street west of Hellman Ave.. NOTES: 8th Street & vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1700 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 54.46 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------ ------- ------- ------ 0.0 0.0 0.0 51.6 Item IJK168 TABLE Opening Year with Project-06 ® FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 7th Street east of Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1900 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 54.94 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.5 Item IJK169 TABLE Opening Year with Project-07 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 6th Street west of Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7000 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 60.61 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 61.4 131.8 I Item IJK170 TABLE Opening Year with Project-08 ® FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 6th Street east of Hellman Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7500 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT ® * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 60.91 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 0.0 0.0 64.3 137.9 Item IJK171 I. I I TABLE Opening Year with Project-09 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 4th Street west of Vineyard Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 13800 -SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 .0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 66.31 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE .TO Lda 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 88.8 185.8 397.6 Item IJK172 TABLE Opening Year with Project-10 ® FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: 4th Street east of Vineyard Ave. NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial.Development Project - opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 16000 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) 66.95 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 97.4 204.8 438.7 • Item IJK173 TABLE Opening Year with Project-11 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Vineyard Ave. north of 8th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue `Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 22100 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION .PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 .ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT i * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.35 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 59.4 119.5 253.3 543.7 Item IJK174 ® TABLE Opening Year with Project-12 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Vineyard Ave. between 8th Street and 4th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 25600 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.99 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 64.6 131.3 279.1 599.5 Item IJK175 i I TABLE Opening Year with Project-13 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Vineyard Ave. south of 4th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard. Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 32200 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS --- ----- � 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 _ ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn .AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 69.99 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------ ------- ------- 73.9 152.3 325.0 698.4 Item IJK176 TABLE Opening Year with Project-14 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. north of 8th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development .Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6100 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: 5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08. 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT ® * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 60.01 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 56.1 120.2 Item IJK177 TABLE Opening Year with Project-15 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. between 8th Street and 7th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6100 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE:. .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 62.76 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 109.6 231.6 Item IJK178 ® TABLE Opening Year with Project-16 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. between 7th Street and 6th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5800 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT ® * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 59.79 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 54.2 116.3 Item IJK179 TABLE Opening Year with Project-17 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ' ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hellman Ave. south of 6th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 4500 SPEED (MPH) : 30 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 58.69 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 0.0 0.0 0.0 98.2 1 Item IJK180 ® TABLE Opening Year with Project-18 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Archibald Ave. north of 8th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 24000 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT • * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.71 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn ------- ------- ------- ------- 62.2 126.0 267.5 574.3 Item IJK181 TABLE Opening Year with Project-19 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 12/05/2013 ROADWAY SEGMENT: Archibald Ave. south of 8th Street NOTES: 8th Street & Vineyard Avenue Industrial Development Project - Opening Year with Project * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 25200 SPEED (MPH) : 45 GRADE: .5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY NIGHT AUTOS 88.08 9.34 M-TRUCKS 1.65 0.19 H-TRUCKS 0.66 0.08 I ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT i i * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.92 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 64.0 130.0 276.3 593.3 Item IJK182 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II ADDENDUM BACKGROUND 1. Project Files: Development Review DRC2013-01118, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518 and Uniform Sign Program Amendment DRC2013-01120 2. Related Files: Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map 18794, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19518 - DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC: A proposal to subdivide a property comprised of nine (9) parcels with a combined area of about 375,000 square feet (8.61 acres) into three (3) parcels in conjunction with the modification of a previously approved industrial/warehouse complex comprised in the General Industrial (GI) District located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-39 and -41 through -48. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00551 was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2010. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration Related files: Development Review DRC2013-01118, Development • Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01118 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC: A review of proposed modifications to a previously approved industrial/warehouse complex and architectural review of three (3) buildings on a property of about 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) in the General Industrial (GI) District located about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street; APNs: 0209-151-38 through -48. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00551 was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2010. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration Related files: Development Review DRC20070-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-01120. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT DRC2013-01120 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC: A modification of Uniform Sign Program #221 for a partially constructed industrial/warehouse complex on a property of 20.7 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-38 through -48. Related files: Oevelopment Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Minor Exception DRC2008-00152. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: DCT 8t' &Vineyard LLC Attn: Terri Allen Item IJK184 r Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-01118 and SUBTPM19518 Page 2 12 Corporate Plaza, Suite 150 Newport Beach, CA 92660 5. General Plan Designation: General Industrial 6. Zoning: General Industrial (GI) District. 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The original project site was triangular shaped and comprised 20.7 acres of land. The new remainder portion of the project comprises of 8.61 acres of vacant land located on the south side of 8"' Street west approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue. The majority of the project site is located between 7th and 8th Streets. The remainder, approximately 38,952 square feet(0.89 acre) in area, is located on the south side of 7th Street. The property is bound on the south and west by the Cucamonga flood control channel and beyond that are single-family residences in the City of Ontario. To the east are industrial office/warehouse buildings and an operations facility for Verizon. To the north is property owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga where the public works administration building and a household hazardous waste facility are located. To the southeast are additional residences. The zoning of the part of the property located between 7th and 8th Street is General Industrial (GI) District, while the zoning of the part of the property south of 7th Street is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north and east are General Industrial (GI) District and General Industrial (GI) District, respectively. The zoning of the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. No demolition or removal of significant vegetation or trees will be. required. The parcel is relatively flat, sloping towards the south. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None. Project History In November 2010, the City of Rancho Cucamonga certified an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") in connection with the approval of Development Review DRC2007-005551 and Tentative PaFceN•Map-18-794 pursuant to•the Galifernia,-�Environmental - Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines. As originally approved, DRC2007- 00551 and SUBTPM18794 allowed for the development of a twelve (12) industrial/warehouse buildings and the subdivision of three (3) lots into twelve (12) parcels on 20.7 acres of vacant land. Item IJK185 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-01118 and SUBTPM19518 Page 3 • The Initial Study and MND approved for DRC2007-00551 and SUBTPM18794 concluded the project would have less than significant impacts with respect to Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Biological Resources, Hydrology and Water Quality, and Transportation/Traffic. It also identified impacts that would be potentially significant unless mitigated in the areas of Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, and Noise and established mitigation measures that would reduce these potential impacts to a less than significant level. The Initial Study Addendum and MND prepared for DRC2007-00551 and SUBTPM18794 did not identify any additional "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" or "Less Than Significant Impacts" but did provide additional analysis under Traffic/Circulation. The traffic analysis determined that the project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing, that the project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent streets, and that no impacts are anticipated. The proposed project entails modifying the original project by reducing the number of building from 9 into 3 and combining nine (9) parcels into three (3), totaling 8.61 acres of land. The study expects the new proposal to have 2 less trips daily than the previous project proposal. All mitigation measures established for the original project were addressed during the plan check, construction, and inspection of the project site during development and during construction of two of the building under the original development review. In December 2013, the applicant filed an application for Design Review DRC2013-01118 to change the layout of the original development from 9 of the remaining building into 3 buildings. This modification increased the size of the buildings but only increased the overall square • footage by 323 square feet. The applicant also submitted a Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518 to combine nine (9) lots into three (3) parcels. A modification to the Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-01120 was also submitted due to the change in the number of building and change in elevations. Analysis Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the City may prepare an addendum to a previously adopted mitigated negative declaration if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions that require the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. Changes to previously approved project for which an EIR or negative declaration was adopted require a subsequent EIR or negative declaration if any of the following conditions are found to exist: (1) Substantial changes in the project require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due ta4heinvo+vement-ef,new-sig nificant•envir-onmental effects ora:substantial•incr-ease in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was • certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows: (a) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative Item IJK186 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-01118 and SUBTPM19518 Page 4 declaration; (b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. An addendum to the previously approve MND is appropriate in this case because a minor change to the project description in the original MND would be sufficient and there is no evidence that any of the conditions that would require a subsequent EIR or negative declaration are present. First, there is no indication that the minor changes to the project will create new significant environmental effects or cause a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The project entails modifying the original project by reducing the number of building from nine (9) into three (3) and combining nine (9) parcels into three (3) totaling 8.61 acres of land. Compared to the originally approved total 389,600 square feet analyzed in the MND, the additional square footage of 323 square feet does not amount to a major change and would not create new significant impacts or increase the severity of any impacts previously identified in the MND. Second, there have been no substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken. The characteristics of the site and the surrounding properties are similar to those that existed previously, and do not indicate that there will be new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Finally , the City has received no new information of substantial importance that was unknown or could not have been known previously that indicates the project will have any significant effects not discussed in the MND, that any previously identified impacts will be substantially more severe, that any mitigation measure previously found infeasible would now be feasible, or that any mitigation measure considerably different from those analyzed in the previous MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment. All mitigation measures established for the original project will be addressed during the plan check, construction, and inspection of the project site during development. The new design of the industrial buildings with the additional 323 square feet, and the reduction of the number of parcel with no change to the overall square footage of land will be subject to the same mitigation measures. Other than an addition of one mitigation measure for Noise to the mitigation measures no additional or different mitigation measures are required. The additional mitigation reads as follows: New Mitigation Measure: Construct a sound wall along the project's north western property line °witlraa-minimum-height of?,B Feet,above-A-he•padselevation-that..can,:be.4-s inatioarof b+trms- .— — -. and concrete masonry units. In sum, the proposed project entails the redesign of an industrial1warehouse complex whose development was thoroughly analyzed for environmental impacts and for which mitigation measures were established. Although the proposed project involves the increase in the square footage, and the reduction in the number of the parcels, there are no substantial changes in the Item IJK187 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-01118 and SUBTPM19518 Page 5 • project, its circumstances, or the information on hand that would suggest that the previous environmental review is inadequate. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum will be added to the previously adopted MND to explain the changes to the project. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of this Development Review application. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Initial Study pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier Initial Study, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signed: Steve Fowler Assistant Planner May 28, 2014 • EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive: (X) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (X) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (X) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update „_...:-. ..,... . .,,...,:.:. .,:.�:.,:,,.,:y:\SCH#88020445; Gertified-Januar%A4 1989 (X) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (X) Air Quality Study (Associated Engineers, October, 2009) Item IJK188 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-01118 and SUBTPM19518 Page 6 (X) Traffic Study (LSA Associates, Inc., July 2008) (X) Water Quality Management Plan. (Associated Engineers, July, 2007) i (X) Noise Impact Study (LSA associates, Inc., December 2013) (X) Air Quality Analysis (LSA Associates, Inc. December, 2013) (X) Health Risk Analysis (LSA Associates, Inc. December, 2013) (X) Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan. (Parsons Brinckerhoft, December, 2013) i (X) Revised Trip Generation Study for 81' and.Vineyard (December 13, 2013) (X) Initial Study Part II for DRC2007-00551 Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00551 (November 10, 2010) i i Item IJK189 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-01118 and SUBTPM19518 Page 7 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. 1 acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study Addendum. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Signature: U' . f Date: Print Name and Title: 1.P(a S I. ( I /: a., jar e,�G'�1172�"Jt j'�' i)1G1 1i Item IJK190 RESOLUTION NO. 14-18 tA RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19518, A PROPOSAL TO SUBDIVIDE A PROPERTY COMPRISED OF NINE (9) PARCELS WITH A COMBINED AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 375,000 SQUARE FEET(8.61 ACRES)INTO THREE(3) PARCELS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE COMPLEX COMPRISED OF 3 BUILDINGS IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(GI)DISTRICT,LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 640 FEET WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET AND THE SOUTH AND NORTH SIDES OF 7TH STREET AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0209-151-38 THROUGH 48. A. Recitals. 1. DCT 8th and Vineyard, LLC filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel map request is referred to as"the application." 2. On the 28th day of May 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly notice public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. ' All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 28, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to nine(9)parcels with a combined area of approximately 375,000 square feet (8.61 acres); and b. The project site is puzzle-shaped and is approximately 220 feet(east to west)at its widest point in the middle of the site the project spans approximately 584 feet and the site has frontage of approximately 260 feet (east to west) along 7th Street; and C. The site is vacant and has been recently rough graded with the-construction-ofthe, first two (2) buildings; and d. The property is bound on the south and west by the Cucamonga flood control channel and beyond there are single-family residences in the City of Ontario. To the east are • industrial office/warehouse buildings and an operations facility for Verizon. To the north is property Item IJK191 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-18 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19518-DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 2 owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is the site for public works administration building and a household hazardous waste facility; and e. The zoning of the part of the property located between 7th and 8th Street is General Industrial(GI)District,while the zoning of the part of the property south of 7th Street is Low- Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north and east are General Industrial (GI) District. The zoning of the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District; and f. The applicant proposes to merge nine (9) parcels on the property into three (3) parcels; (Parcel 1) 2.78 acres, (Parcel 2) 3.66 acres and (Parcel 3) 2.17 acres; and g. Each parcel will comply with the required minimum parcel size of 0.50 acre for projects in this development district; and h. All parcels are contiguous and will be fully developed with buildings and associated improvements; and i. This application is in conjunction with Development Review DRC2013-01118 and Uniform Sign Program Amendment DRC2013-01120. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs-1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed tentative parcel map is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed parcel map is in conjunction with an industrial officetwarehouse complex consisting of three(3)officetwarehouse buildings. The underlying General Plan designation is General Industrial. b. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land use to the north and east, and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the properties to the north and east are General Industrial(GI) District. The zoning of the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. C. The proposed tentative parcel map complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed tentative parcel map meets all standards outlined in-the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all _, written,and.oralreportsinciuceafortheepvirQDM@D,,1al,.assessmentfor,theapplication,thePlanning ,. Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental.Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 10, 2010, in connection with the City's approval of the Development Review of a twelve (12) building Item IJK192 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-18 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19518- DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 3 industrialtwarehouse complex and 13 lot subdivision. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment;(ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the project will have more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the design review of the three (3) industrial building and the merger of nine (9) parcels into three (3) parcels, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The new project is similar in size as the previous approval and the new updated studies have identified only a minor change to the previous mitigation measures. This change is in accordance with the previous Mitigation Monitoring Program, but a new mitigation measure now requires the applicant to construct a sound wall a minimum of eight (8) feet in height along the northwestern property line. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. The project is substantially the same as the previous project with the exception of the added 323 square foot of industrial building ® and the reduction of parcels and buildings from nine(9)to three(3)all the changes were included in the Addendum analysis. The analysis concludes that the project will not have a significant increase on traffic or a significant impact on air quality. The updated studies indicate no new significant effects that were not previously analyzed,and the Addendum to the original environmental mitigation monitoring program is minor. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM19518 and adopts an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts that was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 10, 2010. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of a property comprised of nine(9)parcels with a combined area of approximately 375,000 square feet..(8,61 acre.$),, into three (3) parcels within the General Industrial (GI) District, located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street-APN: 0209-151-38 through'48. • Item IJK193 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-18 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19518- DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 4 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) Easements for the purpose of shared access,use,and maintenance of the parking lot areas, driveways, and drive aisles shall be provided. Documents for these easements shall be submitted for review by the City and the easement recorded with the County of San Bernardino (and other agencies/entities as may be required) prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. 4) All Conditions of Approval for Development Review DRC2013-01118 shall apply. 5) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 shall apply. 6) The applicant shall adhere to all Mitigation Measures in Resolution 10- 42 and Resolution 10-43. Engineering Department 1) Obtain comments on the grading plan from Metropolitan Water District, prior to issuance of grading permit or building permits, whichever occurs first. 2) The final parcel map shall be submitted to the City for plan check. Plan check fees will be determined at time of submittal. 3) All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 10-43 approving Tentative Parcel Map 18794 will continue to apply. Grading Division 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16(Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit for any underground water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMPs). 2) An HCOC exists for the downstream receiving water. The downstream receiving water (Mill Creek, Prado Area) is experiencing significant degradation of its banks. The project shall implement a volume-based __.W,,... .._ . treatment control-BMR (retention/detention,.facil�ty).on..each..I.ot,, .Theu—_,-.,,r.��,µ. Storm Water Quality Management Plan and the grading plan must contain an appropriate volume based BMP prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 3) Metropolitan Water District(MWD) shall approve all plans that impact their easement,including utilities, storm drain, slopes, and street trees and landscaping prior to issuance of a grading permit. A note shall be Item IJK194 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-18 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19518- DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 5 ® included on all pertinent plans requiring Metropolitan Water District Operations Maintenance Branch to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. 4) A permit shall be obtained from Metropolitan Water District for any work within their right-of-way, including grading prior to issuance of a grading permit. 5) The applicant shall obtain written comments from MWD regarding site design restrictions within their easement and provide a copy of said comments to the Building and Safety Official for review. 6) If more than 5,000 square feet of combined asphalt concrete and PCC parking and driveway surface area are removed, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) will be required for this project. Contact the Building and Safety Department for additional direction/information. 7) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 8) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality ® Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 9) The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project.All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Environmental Mitigation Noise 1) Construct a sound wall along the project's northwestern property line with a minimum height of 8 Feet above the pad elevation that can be a combination of berms and concrete masonry units. Tfte-Secretarytopthis Commission shall-certify the adoption of-this Reselutionr.­__•••­_._ APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Item IJK195 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-18 . TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19518 - DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 6 BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of May 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item IJK196 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBTPM19518 SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map APPLICANT: DCT 8t' &Vineyard, LLC On the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-38 LOCATION: through-48 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14-18, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the is Development Code regulations. 1 Item IJK197 Project No. SUBTPM19518 Completion Date 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. . 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all'sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Manager and Police Department(47.7-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, !�_ and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval in accordance _� with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 11. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 12. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 13. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construlction,.activity, dust control measures, and security,fencing...__,_ _ _._ ..,... .. .,: ..... 14. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 2 Item IJK198 Project No. SUBTPM19518 Completion Date D. INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX • 1. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7 a.m. and 8p.m. only. 2. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 3. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 4. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no ovemight parking"and for"employee parking only." 5. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading-No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m.and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent • properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrarnces, and exits�shall be striped per City standards. G. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking, with a minimum of one rack with a capacity for two bicycles. 3 Item IJK199 Project No. SUBTPM19518 Completion Date 2. All development projects subject to TDM (Transportation Demand Management) provisions shall reserve and designate at least 10 percent of the employee parking spaces for the project for ridesharing vehicles by marking such spaces"CarpoolNanpool Only.". 3. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other non-residential development. 4. All development projects where TDM(Transportation Demand Management)provisions apply shall provide shower and locker facilities for use by employees or tenants who commute to the site by bicycle or walking. Such facilities shall be clearly indicated on all developmentrmprovement plans. One shower and eight lockers with minimum dimensions of twelve inches(12") by eighteen inches(18")by thirty-six inches(36")shall be provided for each two hundred (200)employees or fraction thereof, based on the equivalent development size data. The shower and locker facilities must be located convenient to one another and should be located near the employee bicycle parking facilities whenever possible. H. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development,shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 2. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees-24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 5. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, _�_J_ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 7. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. I. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. L_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the.Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. J. Environmental 1. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off- site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval 4 Item IJK200 Project No. SUBTPM1.9518 Completion Date prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, ® residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 4. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 5. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Manager prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an • individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. K. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. . 2. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). L. Building and Safety Industrial and Commercial Standard Conditions 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; • d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; 5 Item IJK201 Project No. SUBTPM19518 Completion Date e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTPM19518) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet' signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage �— to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. �- 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by �— the Building and Safety Services Department. 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Services Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for,plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be �— marked with the project file number (i.e., SUBTPM19518). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Prior to issuance of permit issuance for a new residential project or major addition, the �— applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include,but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, and Transportation Development Fee. 4. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. 5. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map —/_ recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 6 Item IJK202 Project No. SUBTPM19518 Completion Date 6. For projects using septic tank facilities, shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits,and prior to the issuance • of Building Permits. 7. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 8. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department public counter). 9. All commercial/public/multi-family development swimming pool plans shall be submitted to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for review and approval prior to approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 10. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: a. Provide a reduced Site Plan (8 1/2-inches by 11 inches), which indicates the non- buildable easement. b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement,"which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s). New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. • 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind" instructions. 4. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Provide draft stops in attic areas in accordance with CBC Section 1505. 6. Roofing materials shall be Class"A." 7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC . 8. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be in accordance with the CBC. ——— 10. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC. 11. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. k Grading _ 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The grading and drainage plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading and ® drainage plan. 7 Item IJK203 Project No. SUBTPM19518 Completion Date 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or engineering geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall I/_ be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from the Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on- site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owners to construct walls on property lines or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed off-set from the property line. 12. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 13. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot off-set from the public right-of-way or adjacent private property. 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 15. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the current adopted California Building Code. - 16. The final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 feet beyond the project boundary. 8 Item IJK204 Project No. SUBTPM19518 completion Date 17. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The grading agreement . and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 18. Provide documentation for CVWD sewer off-set program to the Building and Safety Official for review prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 19. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 20. The precise Grading and Drainage Plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit." 21. Grading Inspections: a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the Grading Permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i. The bottom of the over-excavation; ii. Completion of rough grading-The grading contractor or owner shall submit to the • Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Services Department front counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; .iii. The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices(BMP)devices. 23. Private streets for multi-family developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 24. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. N. Water Quality Management Plan 1. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan"shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 9 Item IJK205 Project No. SUBTPM19516 Completion Date O. Security Lighting 1. All parking,common,and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. �= These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. i 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate.dark areas around the buildings, �= with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. The lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. The lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. P. Security Hardware 1. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors.' If windows are —�— within 40 inches of any locking device,tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. —�—�— 3. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal —�—�- gates, or alarmed. Q. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the —�— police with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed because of a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at(909)941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at(909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. R. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for —�—�— nighttime visibility. 2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall —�—� be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. 10 Item IJK206 Project No. SUBTPM19518 Completion Date 3. All developments shall submit an 8 %" x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi- —/—/— • tenant developments to the Police Department as approved by the Building and Safety Services Department. S. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and —/—/— employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number: �— (909)941-1488. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909)477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes,the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at www.citvofrc.us. T. Industrial Fire Standard Conditions FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design Guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10. �— FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual —/—/— pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with • California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 2. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be usedto provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until the fire protection water supply plans are approved. 4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of the proposed proposed project site. FSC-3 Pre-requisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the —/—/— California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. • 11 Item IJK207 Project No. SUBTPM19518 Completion Date FSC-5 Fire Alarm System&Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The current edition of California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm Standard 9-3 require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standards. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard 5-1. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located within �- 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: —�—�— a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. C. The minimum outside tum radius shall be 50 feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median,the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. i. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: -Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be —/—/— provided as follows: a. In buildings without high=piled storage,access shall be provided in accordance with the current edition.of California Building/Fire Codes and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Waikways: Kardscaped access walkways shall be provided frorrkthe.fife,epperstus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with RCFPD Standard 5-9. 12 Item IJK208 Project No. SUBTPM19518 Completion Date 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall —�—/— be in accordance with Fire District Standards. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. C. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan /— illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted �— on the Site Plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for plan review. 9. Roof Access: must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard. There shall —/—/— be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures more than 10,000 square feet or with roof more than 15 feet in height and less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by the Fire Department aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. _. . .__ . .. .:,,..,,..: The�iurribef of``I cider'p0int �riay:tYe`tequiretl to be increased, -lepedding-oh 'the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. 13 Item IJK209 Project No. SUBTPM19518 Completion Date f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix. h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access madway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit;field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below,which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Aerosol Products • Magnesium Working • Application of Flammable Finishes • Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Open Burning • Battery Systems • Organic Coating • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Ovens • Cellulose Nitrate • Powder Coating • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Pyrotechnical Special Effects • Dry Cleaning Plants • Radioactive Materials Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids Rubbish Handling Operations Fruit Ripening Plants SpyaJ.�9.or.Dippins09kreti-ons Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures High-Pile Combustible Storage(HIPS) Tire Storage • Liquefied Petroleum Gases 14 Item IJK210 Project No. SUBTPM19518 Completion Date • Welding and Cutting Operations • • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings • Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials–Submittal to the County of San Bernardino' �— The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at(909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency(CUPA)for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety —/—/— Services Department will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a plan is �— also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials-Submittal to Fire Construction Services —/— • 1. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the current editions of the California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application - Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will —/—/— review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District"Application for Alternate Method"form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation —/- 1. Reciprocal Agreements for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorder's Office. 2. Reciprocal Access Agreement–Please provide a permanent access agreement between the —/— owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive.easement, favoring the Fii:e,:Distdct.,to:gain.,, s access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. • 3. Reciprocal Water Covenant – Please provide a permanent maintenance and service —/—/— covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring 15 Item IJK211 Project No. SUBTPM19518 Completion Date the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains,valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the Parcel Map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community --- Facilities District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of Grading or Building Permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS— Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review. and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site(private)fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed,flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply(Domestic/Fire)Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed,flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet,6 inches above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The,building Eonstructior�.mgst be substantial„y,completed in accordance,with Fire Construction Services'"Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures." PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134,"Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On 16 Item IJK212 Project No. SUBTPM19518 Completion Date private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. • 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in —/—/— the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler —/—/— system(s)shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,the fire sprinkler —/—/— monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, —/�— tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system —/—/— shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates —/— • must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access �— roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire —/—/— Construction Services. 1.1. .. Qo-ofdential..Business.Occupancy Information: The applicant shall,.complete., the. Rancho .—/—/— Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the —/—/— • issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 '/Z' x 11" or 11" x 17" Site.Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual 17 Item IJK213 Project No. SUBTPM19516 Completion Date location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. i i i 18 Item IJK214 RESOLUTION NO. 14-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01118 A PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP AN INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE COMPLEX COMPRISED OF 3 BUILDINGS AND 3 PARCELS ON A PUZZLE-SHAPED PROPERTY OF APPROXIMATELY 375,000 SQUARE FEET (8.61 ACRES) IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(GI)DISTRICT, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 640 FEET WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET AND THE SOUTH AND NORTH SIDES OF 7TH STREET; MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0209-151-38 THROUGH -48. A. Recitals. 1. DCT 8th and Vineyard, LLC filed an application for the issuance of Development Review DRC2013-01118, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of May 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly notice public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 28, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to nine(9) parcels with a combined area of approximately 375,000 square feet (8.61 acres); and b. The project site is puzzle-shaped and is approximately 220 feet(east to west)at its widest point in the middle of the site the project spans approximately 584 feet and the site has frontage of approximately 260 feet (east to west) along 7th Street; and C. The site is vacant and has been recently rough graded with the construction of the fist two (2) buildings; and d. The property is bound on the south and west by the Cucamonga flood control channel and beyond there are single-family residences in the City of Ontario. To the east are industrial office/warehouse buildings and an operations facility for Verizon. To the north is property • owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is the site for public works administration building and a household hazardous waste facility; and Item IJK215 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-19 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01118- DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 2 e. The zoning of the part of the property located between 7th and 8th Street is General Industrial(GI) District,while the zoning of the part of the property south of 7th Street is Low- Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north and east are General Industrial (GI) District. The zoning of.the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District; and f. The applicant proposes to construct three (3) office/warehouse buildings, with a combined floor area of approximately 158,860 square feet; and g. The application contemplates warehouse tenants. As defined in Development Code Section 17.30.030, "light"and "medium"warehouse uses are permitted in this development district. Other potential uses that are permitted,subject to the availability of parking on-site, include "custom" and "light" manufacturing; and h. The applicant is required to provide 294 parking stalls. They have provided 297 parking stalls; and i. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518 and Uniform Sign Program Amendment DRC2013-01120; and j. A review and request for approval of land uses are not included in this application. 3. Based upon .the substantial. evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed project is an industrial office/warehouse complex consisting of three(3)office/warehouse buildings. The underlying General Plan designation is General industrial. b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant;the proposed land use is consistent with the. land use to the north and east and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the properties . to the north and east are General Industrial (GI) District. The zoning of the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District; C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code except the number of stalls for truck trailer parking/storage;the applicant has an approval for Minor Exception(Related file: DRC2008-00152)for the decrease of truck trailer parking throughout the project. The proposed development otherwise meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. The proposal does not contemplate any review and action for land use entitlements. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental. environmental document is required Item IJK216 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-19 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01118 - DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 3 • pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 10, 2010, in connection with the City's approval of the Development Review of a twelve (12) building industrial/warehouse complex and 13 lot subdivision. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment;(ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the project will have more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the design review of the three (3) industrial building and the merger of nine (9) parcels into three (3) parcels, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative . Declaration. The new project is similar in size as the previous approval and the new updated studies have identified only a minor change to the previous mitigation measures. This change is in accordance with the previous Mitigation Monitoring Program, but a new mitigation measure now requires the applicant to construct a sound wall a minimum of eight (8) feet in height along the northwestern property line. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. The project is substantially the same as the previous project with the exception of the added 323 square foot of industrial building and the reduction of parcels and buildings from nine(9)to three(3)all the changes were included in the Addendum analysis. The analysis concludes that the project will not have a significant increase on traffic or a significant impact on air quality. The updated studies indicate no new significant effects that were not previously analyzed,and the Addendum to the original environmental mitigation monitoring program is minor. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Development Review DRC2013-01118 and adopts an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts that was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 10, 2010. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction of three(3)office/warehouse buildings, • with a combined floor area of 158,860 square feet in the General Industrial(GI) District, located about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue Item IJK217 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-19 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01118- DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 4 at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street-APN: 0209-151-38 through 48. 2) 'Proposed land uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit as identified in Table 17.30.030 of the Development Code, shall require a separate review and approval by the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check, issuance of a Business License, and building occupancy. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 4) Easements for the purpose of shared access,use,and maintenance of the parking lot areas, driveways, and drive aisles shall be provided. Documents for these easements shall be submitted for review by the City and the easement recorded with the County of San Bernardino (and other agencies/entities as may be required) prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. 5) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 6) The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. The maximum height of light standards,including the base,measured from the finished surface is 25 feet. 7) New walls, including retaining walls,shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone,or have a decorative finish such as stucco. 8) All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or a similarly dark color. 9) Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. 10) The Landscape Plan shall comply with Ordinance No. 823 adopted by the City Council on December 2, 2010. All landscaping shall- be installed prior to final acceptance of the buildings and/or project site complete and release for occupancy. 11) All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices,etc. shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of Item IJK218 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-19 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01118- DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 5 • shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted forest green. 12) All Double Detector Checks(DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC)required and/or proposed shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall have a decorative finish to match the building. 13) The employee lunch area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. 14) Incorporate undulating berms along the street frontages (where applicable), within the landscape setback and landscape areas. The highest part of the berms should be at least 3 feet in height. 15) All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to . match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 16) Provide durable street furniture in outdoor employee eating area, such as tables, chairs, waste receptacles. 17) All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The • design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. 18) The applicant shall submit a final draft (incorporating any applicable technical corrections to the text, format, etc.) of the Uniform Sign Program (related file: DRC2008-00681) for the City's records prior to issuance of building permits. All signs shall be in conformance with the Uniform Sign Program and require review and approval of a separate Sign Permit application by the Planning Director prior to installation. 19) All conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518 shall apply. 20) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 shall apply. 21) The applicant shall adhere to all Mitigation Measures in Resolution 10- 42 and Resolution 10-43. EnQineerina Department 1) Obtain comments on the grading plan from Metropolitan Water District, prior to issuance of grading permit or building permits, whichever occurs first. 2) The final parcel map shall be submitted to the City for plan check. Plan check fees will be determined at time of submittal. Item IJK219 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-19 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01118- DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 6 3) All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 10-43 approving Tentative Parcel Map 18794 will continue to apply. Grading Division 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit for any underground water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMPs). 2) An HCOC exists for the downstream receiving water. The downstream receiving water (Mill Creek, Prado Area) is experiencing significant degradation of its banks. The project shall implement a volume-based treatment control BMP (retention/detention facility) on each lot. The Storm Water Quality Management Plan and the grading plan must contain an appropriate volume based BMP prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 3) Metropolitan Water District(MWD) shall approve all plans that impact their easement, including utilities, storm drain, slopes,and street trees and landscaping prior to issuance of a grading permit. A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requiring Metropolitan Water District Operations Maintenance Branch to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. 4) A permit shall be obtained from Metropolitan Water District for any work within their right-of-way, including grading prior to issuance of a grading permit. 5) The applicant shall obtain written comments from MWD regarding site design restrictions within their easement and provide a copy of said comments to the Building and Safety Official for review. 6) If more than 5,000 square feet of combined asphalt concrete and PCC parking and driveway surface area are removed, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) will be required for this project. Contact the Building and Safety Department for additional direction/information. 7) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 8) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. Item IJK220 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-19 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01118 - DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC May 28, 2014 Page 7 • 9) The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the 'underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project.All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Environmental Mitigation Noise 1) Construct a sound wall along the project's north western property line with a minimum height of 8 Feet above the pad elevation that can be a combination of berms and concrete masonry units. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of May 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: AIRSs=NT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item IJK221 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2013-01118 SUBJECT: Development Review APPLICANT: DCT 811 &Vineyard, LLC On the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-38 LOCATION: through -48 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements completion Date • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14-19, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not • commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 1 Item IJK222 Project No. DRC2013-01118 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department,the conditions contained herein,the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _I I submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Manager and Police Department(477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, /I and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall f_ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 11. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 12. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 13. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 2 Item IJK223 Project No. ORC2013-01118 Completion Date 14. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double • wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. D. INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX 1. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7 a.m. and 8p.m. only. —/—/- 2. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 3. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris debris remain for more than 24 hours. 4. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking"and for"employee parking only." /—/— 5. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an _/—/— exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading-No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, —/—/— or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m.and 7 a.m.unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. •E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. --- F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall.be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., —/—/ over a curb stop). 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, —/—/ • entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. — 3 Item IJK224 Project No. DRC2013-01118 Completion Date G. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking, with a minimum of one rack with a capacity for two bicycles. 2. All development projects subject to TDM (Transportation Demand Management) provisions shall reserve and designate at least 10 percent of the employee parking spaces for the project for ridesharing vehicles by marking such spaces"Carpool/Vanpool Only.". 3. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other non-residential development 4. All development projects where TDM(Transportation Demand Management)provisions apply shall provide shower and locker facilities for use by employees or tenants who commute to the site by bicycle or walking. Such facilities shall be clearly indicated on all developmentlimprovement plans. One shower and eight lockers with minimum dimensions of twelve inches(12") by eighteen inches(18") by thirty-six inches(36")shall be provided for each two hundred (200)employees or fraction thereof, based on the equivalent development size data. The shower and locker facilities must be located convenient to one another and should be located near the employee bicycle parking facilities whenever possible. H. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development,shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 2. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees-24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 6. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 7. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. I. Signs 1. 7.e.signs.indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part"0.this appic' M'. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4 Item IJK225 Project No. DRC2013-01118 Completion Date J. Environmental 1. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation —/—/— measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off- site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior .to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 4. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms.of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental • documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 5. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), _/—/— the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Manager prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. K. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. ——— APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS..AND NECESSITATE. iEvJjSj. .ADDITIONAL= REV - . . L. Building and Safety Industrial and Commercial Standard Conditions 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: • a. Site/Plot Plan; 5 Item IJK226 Project No. DRC2013-01118 Completion Date b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the site of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., DRC2013-01118, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architects/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Services Department. 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Services Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2013-01118). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Prior to issuance of permit issuance for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, and Transportation Development Fee. 4. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for anew commercial o[industrial development project or major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building.and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. 6 Item IJK227 Project No. DRC2013-01118 Completion Date 5. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 6. For projects using septic tank facilities, shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to the issuance of Building Permits, 7. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday / /— through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 8. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department public counter). 9. All commercial/public/multi-famify development swimming pool plans shall be submitted to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for review and approval prior to approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 10. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: a. Provide a reduced Site Plan (8 1/2-inches by 11 inches), which indicates the non- buildable easement. b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement,"which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s). New Structures 1. Provide compliance.with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances —/—/ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. —/—/- 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind" instructions. 4. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Provide draft stops in attic areas in accordance with CBC Section 1505. 6. Roofing materials shall be Class"A." 7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC . 8. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be in accordance with the CBC. --- 10. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC. 11. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. M. Grading • 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The grading and drainage 7 Item IJK228 Project No. DRC2013-01118 Completion Date plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or engineering geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official I I_ for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from the Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall I I be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on- site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire. any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owners to construct walls on property lines or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed off-set from the property line. 12. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 13. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot off-set from the public right-of-way or adjacent private property. 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted Califomia..Plumbing-Code. 15. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the current adopted California Building Code. 16. The final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 feet beyond the project boundary. 8 Item IJK229 Project No. DRC2013-01118 Completion Date 17. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The grading agreement • and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 18. Provide documentation for CVWD sewer off-set program to the Building and Safety Official for review prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 19. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 20. The precise Grading and Drainage Plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit." 21. Grading Inspections: a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the Grading Permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i. The bottom of the over-excavation; ii. Completion of rough grading-The grading contractor or owner shall submit to the • Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Services Department front counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iii. The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 23. Private streets for multi-family developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 24. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. N. Water Quality Management Plan 1. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan"shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE. DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR •COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 9 Item IJK230 Project No. DRC2013-011.18 Completion Date O. Security Lighting 1. All parking,common,and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. —�— These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, �— with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. The lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. The lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures.P. Security Hardware 1. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device,tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. —�—�— 3. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed. Q. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed because of a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at(909)941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at(909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. R. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for �— nighttime visibility. 2. All developments shall submit an 8 '/z' x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi- tenant developments to the Police Department as approved by the Building and Safety Services Department. S. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in tum save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number: �— (909) 941-1488. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909)477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH.THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes,the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures &standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at www.citvofrc.us. T. Industrial Fire Standard Conditions 10 Item IJK231 Project No. DRC2013-01118 Completion Date FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design Guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual —�— pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 2. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used �— to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until the fire protection water supply plans are approved. 4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of —/— the proposed project site. FSC-3 Pre-requisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit —/_/— plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. • FSC4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the �— California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection.District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System&Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The current edition of California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm /— Standard 9-3 require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standards. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard 5-1. 1. Location of Access: AU portions of the structures 1 st story exterior wall shall be-located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. 11 Item IJ K232 Project No. DRC2013-01118 Completion Date b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. C. The minimum outside tum radius shall be 50 feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median,the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. i. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: "Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a.. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the current edition of California Building/Fire Codes and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with �— RCFPD Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall —� be in accordance with Fire District Standards. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. C. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open,the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. Themmtorized ate-actUafio'nt'mi�-chatiithi rnus a -e ui � ed with`b-rhanuai overnae device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. 12 Item IJK233 Project No. DRC2013-01118 Completion Date i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the • complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan —/—/— illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the Site Plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for plan review. 9. Roof Access: must be in accordance with the RCFPD. Roof Access Standard. There shall —/—./.— be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures more than 10,000 square feet or with roof more than 15 feet in height and less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by the Fire Department aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. • c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix. h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits —/—/— Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit;field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required _ for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in_.the judgment.of the Fire Chief isliliely Co produce conditions that may be hazardous to life orro e p p rtY • Aerosol Products • Magnesium Working • Application of Flammable Finishes • • Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation 13 Item IJK234 Project No. DRC2013-01118 Completion Date • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Open Burning • Battery Systems • Organic Coating • Candies and open flames in public assemblies • Ovens • Cellulose Nitrate • Powder Coating • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Pyrotechnical Special Effects • Dry Cleaning Plants • Radioactive Materials • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Rubbish Handling Operations • Fruit Ripening Plants • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage(HPS) • Tire Storage • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • Welding and Cutting Operations • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings • Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials–Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at(909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency(CUPA)for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business,a Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety �— Services Department will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government.Code, Section 65850:2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a plan is /—/— also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business 14 Item IJK235 Project No. DRC2013-01118 Completion Date is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) • working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials-Submittal to Fire Construction Services —/—/- 1. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the current editions of the California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application - Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District"Application for Alternate Method"form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation —/- 1. Reciprocal Agreements for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorder's Office. 2. Reciprocal Access Agreement–Please provide a permanent access agreement between the —/—/— owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain • access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. 3. Reciprocal Water Covenant – Please provide a permanent maintenance and service —/—/— covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection' systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the Parcel Map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community �— Facilities District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of Grading or Building Permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS – Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, —/—/— specifications; flow test data and calculations for the private water main°system for review and approval by the Fire District: Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site(private)fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. • The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. 15 Item IJK236 Project No. DRC2013-01118 Completion Date All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed,flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply(Domestic/Fire)Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet, 6 inches above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services''Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures." PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION-Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating �— the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, 'Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler �— system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4: Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy;the fire sprinkler ——— monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or 16 Item IJK237 Project No. DRC2013-01118 • Completion Date equipment is placed in service. • 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system —/=/— shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates —/ must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access —� roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the —/—/— issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire �— Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho —/—/— • Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the —/—/— issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 %Z' x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 17 Item IJK238 RESOLUTION NO.14-20 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT DRC2013-01120 USP NO. 221, IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(GI)DISTRICT, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 640 FEET WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET AND THE SOUTH AND NORTH SIDES OF 7TH STREET; MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0209 151-38 THROUGH -48. A. Recitals. 1. DCT 8th and Vineyard, LLC filed an application for the issuance of an amendment to Uniform Sign Program No. 221, DRC2013-01120, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of May 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly notice public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on May 28, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to twelve (12) parcels with a combined area of approximately 904,000 square feet(20.7 acres); and b. The project site is triangular in shape that is approximately 1,100 feet(east to west) at its widest point along 8th Street and 260 feet(east to west)along 7th Street. It is approximately 1,650 feet measured north to south.; and C. The property is bound on the south and west by the Cucamonga flood control channel and beyond there are single-family residences in the City of Ontario. To the east are industrial office/warehouse buildings and an operations facility for Verizon.�,To-them-rth=is--property owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is the site for public works administration building and a household hazardous waste facility; and d. The zoning of the part of the property located between 7th and 8th Street is • General Industrial(GI) District,while the zoning of the part of the property south of 7th Street.is Low- Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north and east are General Item IJK239 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.14-20 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT DRC2013-01120—DCT 8t' &VINEYARD LLC May 28, 2014 Page 2 Industrial (GI) District. The zoning of the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District; and e. The applicant proposes to amend the Uniform Sign Program No.221 or DRC2013- 01120 due to the changes in the elevations and sizes of the buildings. The program still complies with standards and guidelines of the Sign Ordinance. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan by providing an area for signage to allow businesses to identify where their business is located to promote growth; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located by requiring the Uniform Sign Program to adhere to the standards and guidelines set forth in the Sign Ordinance; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code by limiting the size and area of the signage to not detract from the architecture of the building; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 10, 2010, in connection with the City's approval of the Development Review of a twelve (12) building industrialtwarehouse complex and 13 lot subdivision. Pursuantto CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment;(ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the project will have more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation .new.feaaibtl.e-Jamduce .ct&.Q_r.dif#erent mitigation measures.can.be.imposed..to-- substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the design review of the three (3) industrial building and the merger of nine (9) parcels into three (3) parcels, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Item IJK240 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.14-20 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT DRC2013-01120—DCT 8t' &VINEYARD LLC May 28, 2014 Page 3 Declaration. The new project is similar in size as the previous approval and the new updated studies have identified only a minor change to the previous mitigation measures. This change is in accordance with the previous Mitigation Monitoring Program, but a new mitigation measure now requires the applicant to construct a sound wall a minimum of eight (8) feet in height along the northwestern property line. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. The project is substantially the same as the previous project with the exception of the added 323 square foot of industrial building and the reduction of parcels and buildings from nine(9)to three(3)all the changes were included in the Addendum analysis. The analysis concludes that the project will not have a significant increase on traffic or a significant impact on air quality. The updated studies indicate no new significant effects that were not previously analyzed,and the Addendum to the original environmental mitigation monitoring program is minor C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Uniform Sign Program Amendment DRC2013- 01120 and adopts an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts that was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 10, 2010. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in-the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. • Planning Department 1) Approval is for the Amendment of Uniform Sign Program (USP) DRC2013-01120 in the General Industrial (GI) District, located about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street-APN: 0209-151-38 through 48. 2) Any alterations to the approved Uniform Sign Program shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Manager prior to any amendments. 3) The applicant shall comply with all applicable codes and obtain all the necessary permits from the Building and Safety Services Department. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Item IJK241 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.14-20 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT DRC2013-01120—DCT 8th &VINEYARD LLC May 28, 2014 Page 4 BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of May 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item IJK242 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2013-01120 SUBJECT: Uniform Sign Program Amendment APPLICANT: DCT 8t' &Vineyard, LLC On the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-38 LOCATION: through -48 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein,the Development Code regulations: 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 1 Item IJK243 Project No. DRC2013-01120 Completion Date 4. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 5. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 6. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking"and for"employee parking only." ®. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. I 2 Item IJK244 MASTER SPhelan Center One 8th Street & Vineyard PRt, RAM Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 QTY OF RAN C- 410 CUQA rt ONV4 Prepared For CT DEC 19 2013 Property Owner: " ECEWD e NNN DCT 8th &Vineyard, LLC �vzw oazz 12 Corporate Plaza - Suite 150 Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 219-1242 main H (949) 720-8080 fox Contact:Adrienne Cord �.L-4 Email: ocord@ydctiridustrial.com R.� Prepared By 4 Program Designer: 1 1 1 W. Dyer Rd., Unit F Santa Ana, CA 92707 714.641..0064 SIGN SPECIALISTS 714.641.0065 fax C O R P O R A T I O N Contact: Hector Betancourt December 17,2013 Table of Contents -General Information....................................... P 2 ..... ................................................................. age -Schedule Of Sign Types....................................... Page 3 -General Requirements........................................................................................................... Page 4 -Site Plan................... . . ...........................................................................................................Page 5 -Sign Type 1 - (Parapet Signage) Page 6 4 I 't Sign Type - Parapet Signs - Major Tenants... ..... .. ........................ ......... Page 6 -Sign Type 2 - (Monument Signage) Sign Type - Monument Signs ... .................................... Page 25 -Sign Type 3 - (Building Address Signage) Sign Type (DC - Building Address Signs............................................................ Page 27 -Sign Type 4 - (Building Entry Signage) Sign Type Door Graphics....................................... P 30 . ..................... Sign TypeI-Window Graphics............................ Page 30 Mostf 'rogrom Genwral Information -Property Owner DCT 8th & Vineyard, LLC 12 Corporate Plaza - Suite 150 Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 219-1242 main (949) 720-8080 fax -Architect Carlile Coatsworth Architects, Inc. 2495 Campus Drive Irvine, CA 92612 (949) 833-1930 main (949) 833-1140 fax ct 71Z' r` -Signage Consultant Sign Specialists Corporation 1 11 W. Dyer Road, Unit F Santa Ana, Co. 92707 (714) 641-0064 (714) 641-0065 fax -Governing Municipality Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dept. 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T; (909) 477-2750 Master Sign Program Schedule of Sign Typal Qty Sign Type 1 A (Parapet Signage) Sign Type - Parapet Signs - Major Tenants.................................................. Qty. 14 -Sign Type 2 - (Monument Signage) Sign Typer-B)m Monument Signs ...................................................................... Qty. 2 a -Sign Type 3 - (Building Address Signage) Sign Type ©- Building Address Signs............................................................ Qty. 10 Sign Type 4 - (Building Entry Signage) Sign Type i DI Door Graphics........................................................................... Qty. 1 1 Sign Type E Window Graphics...................................................................... Qty. 11 Musie Program General Requirements 1 . Submittal: Tenant's sign contractor-shall submit (3) sets of detailed drawings indicating: the sign location (as regulated in this sign program), the sign layout and colors, and the method of construction and installation. Landlord shall review plans, and return one set of plans, approved or noted for corrections. Plans "noted for correction" must be resubmitted for final approval. 2. Upon receipt of Landlord approval, tenant's sign contractor shall acquire all necessary permits from the City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to starting production. All pert-nit fees are the responsibility of the tenant. 3. Sign construction, installation and maintenance costs shall be paid by the tenant. Signage must be maintained to remain in "like new" condition in all cases. All non-conforming and non-maintained signage shall be corrected by the tenant within 30 days of landlord notification. Any corrections not corrected in the 30 day period shall be corrected by the landlord, and billed back to the tenant at the full cost incurred 4. Tenant's sign contractor shall provide copies of Worker's Compensation, General Liability Insurance and any other information requested by Landlord prior to starting the sign installation. 5. Each tenant signage submittal shall be reviewed on an individual basis, and approved or rejected based on the 7'c guidelines set forth in this sign program, and based on the sign compatibility to the architecture of the sign area it is to be 4z, installed upon. Final approval to be at the landlord's discretion, and also pending approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Z 6. The standard signage norm throughout the center shall be Parapet signage. 7. Overall maintenance of all other signage will be the responsibility of the landlord. Signage must be maintained to remain in "like new" condition in all cases. 8. Prohibited Signage Guidelines: a. No animated,flashing or audible signs. b. No exposed lamps or neon tubing. c. No exposed crossovers and/or conduit. d. No painted wall lettering or graphics. E. No signage design prohibited by City or State law. 9. Any additional requested signage not covered in this sign program shall fall under review of the City of Rancho Cucamonga general signage criteria. Master Sign Program Site Plan (8th St. and Vineyard, Rancho Cucamonga California) I �I Bulltllnq C SS.a50 sl Ow - Building E 37.530 sf I ❑ ❑ Bulldlnq D 50,580 sf I I / I /I Building B ` I 99.359 0 / LA I I / B 7 n PK I Iz9,s,704oa sl I I I I / I I moste R ogi um Plot t-ion - Sign Type I A (Parapet Signage - Major Tenants) AO - Parapet Signage - Major Tenants Qty. 14 (Proposed) I e I Bonding C I 55 by_O sfsf BuNding E A /� - 37,530 sf I I�'� A/' ❑ `�# ❑ A A - Building D 60,580 sf I Building B / 99,359_ sf / / I // Building A 1 129.704 sf I I I I I I I Master Sign Program Sign Type 1 A (Parapet Signage - Major Tenants) - Parapet Signage - Major Tenants Qty. 14 (Proposed) PARAPET SIGNS - "MAJOR TENANTS" - CHANNEL LETTERING 'Major Tenant"Parapet signs will be allowed on buildings A.B,C,D and E.Tenants occupying more than 20.00 Sq.Ft.shall be shall be considered"Major Tenants"as will be eligible for this type of sign.Eligibility will be at the sole discretion of the Landlord and further described in the tenants CC&Rs/Lease Agreements.No more than two(2)building signs shall be placed on any building elevation. "Major Tenant"Parapet signs(Option#1)shall be made from 4"deep channel letters with the option of internal LED illumination and will be limited to the specifications listed below. Letters/logos will have acrylic faces with automotive grade Black painted returns(edges)and Trim-cap painted to match face color in ALS cases.Tenant logos must have corporate trade logo in this type of sign.No face color or typestyle/font restrictions will be planed on signs with logos,however colors used must contrast to be eligible for use of a sign area building color in all cases.Logos will_ marks allowed on li case by case basis at the sole discretion of building ownership/management.Logo canisters should closely follow the contour of the artwork they display(No"Block"Canisters or"Light Boxes"). If tenant has no corporate trademarked logo,the typestyle/font used for these signs shall be"Friz Quadrata Bold"exclusively(See illustration below).Tenant name shall be displayed in CAPITAL LETTERS only with White acrylic faces and automotive grade Black painted returns(edges)with Black Tran-cap.Final design approval shall be at the sole discretion of the Landlord. The maximum height of these letters/logos will be 24"with a minimum height of 16". The maximum size for these signs shall be 24"(2')tall by 288' (24')wide and shall be limited by whatever size limitation is encountered first.The maximum square footage for this type of sign is 48 Sq.Ft.Letters are to be installed directly to building fascia in locations as shown or in areas determined by leasehold frontage. Note.Some sign locations will have smaller(20')length restrictions.See elevations for individual restrictions. Sign plans will be submitted to Lanalord/management prior to submission to the city and will include dimensions,materials,locations on elevations and colors used.Two(2)sets of plans shall be submitted for approval to building ownership/management in all cases.Upon approval,one set of plans will be returned to the tenant for submission to the city of Rancho Cucamonga. ~ Permit submission shall be the sole responsibility of the tenant.Tenant is responsible for any/all costs incurred.All signs shall comply with the guidelines set forth in this sign program and the regulations set forth by the �( city of Rancho Cucamonga. 71;:: Upon terminatiun of lease agreement,tenant shall be responsible for removal of signs and restoration of sign area to near new condition.Should tenant fail to remove signs within 30 days of vacating the property, U building ownership/managehtent will remove signs and tenant will be billed for the full cost incurred. 0 SIGN AREA "MAJOR TENANT" Option #1 Sample with Logo .. .: FRIZ QUADRA-FA BOLD - - tea 1, �� CMN �OGO - 1 234567890 OPQRSTUVWXYZ 11 MAXIMUM LOGO MAXIMUM LETTER �s HEIGHT=2419 HEIGHT= 2499 MAXIMUM LETTER "MAJOR TENANT" Option #1 Sample without Logo HEIGHT=24f9 aae - _.c. SIGN AREA Moste 'rogrom Sign Type m 1 A Illuminated Installation Detail Im - Parapet Signage - Major Tenants --- - - - --- ---- - - - - ----- -- - -- --- -- ------------------ ---- �- Fabrication/Installation Detail I Electrical Wiring - Typical \� Ia- 1 A 4"deep..040"Nec'alumina•:+ A ---- (NTS) 1 ( `- i 12VDC(non-polonzed) One(1)Power Supply O 2 y1 ------ ---- -- j. -------- �l r,. °,;�ews and n on oad:a: C -- - Pp Y I In int �SEIs{'-i Ch(truCler}. .j\��•\•// (n\}--------------- - Id O W�ra nui coenettios Iran so-rordm% U ______ _____ f.ed to LEDs Klass 2 low wltagel. _ I OE Ru`,tf r•granunet. ------ E ---__-. �J ;T7 : ;; ' I G Seeoniory feed(CIO ?In•••voha5.a; a------ _____• __________ Iron oocm,supaly to letter. '. •;; �\ OG 311 h"fh¢1.fro lucem ocr lig.fn-e // O Ud3"thick..h4.��namel-coated l `-`- -----'--' :.lummom backer I O i2•power supply.unit olummmr, V" I J Class 2 LED lionhng. ONm:my .U power supolY. OTu a.aicored acu l•AC 10-240V SU:5UHz D 4 per chorncf— �� �"� i OJraln note,(mm.I pcu lowc e,pautt(sl P.,charoct'r1 I {-______ _______-_� 112VDC(non-polarized) One(1 Power Supply 4"Return_ Woll Th,rknns (u"Typ.) --------------------------- --------•----- - ---------- --------- ---------- ----- VGA— Master S gn Program Sign Type 1 A - Mon Illuminated Installation Detail - Parapet Signage - Major Tenants -- - - ------- - - - --- ----- - - ------ - - -------- - - ------- - - ---- ----- --------- - ----- �/ Fabrication/Installation Detail Typical\\ I O3"deep,.040"thick.aluminum O--- - (NTS) I retua�s --_ ;��_ .� OB a 10 2"saeva and nylon a:xhoas 4nm a s_ts aer charucn..i e O3/16'1h ck cl.at polycmbonat- DO n8+ �.",craves(rn:n 4 per chera:lerlOE D:a:n hale,innn.I per lo•cost po:nllsl I N+r.hGraC:erl /� / I `kms � ��/�`, •�/ � UL,,. 3"Rtum-I wall(h,kness T I W'Typ.) \———— ————————————————— — — ——————————————————— —————— ——— ————————————————————————-/ Moste grogram Sign 'ype 1 A - Elevations (Building A) Parapet Signage a Major Tenants Sign Location NORTH Elevation Cr EQ FEQ w - NORTH Elevation Expanded View (Left Side) NORTH Elevation Expanded View (Right Side) *For this sign location, maximum length is 20' Moste, Sign Program Sign Type I A - Ekwations (Building A) A - Parapet Signage - Major Tenants Sign Location — r - .._ EAST Elevation —- 2;_3: - - - - - EQ 24 LE t13 i a EAST Elevation Expanded View (Left Side) M�stc i oc�rcm sign Hype I A - Elevations (Budding A) Parapet Signage - Major Tenants Sign Location WEST Elevation A FF WEST Elevation Expanded View EiEl - -- o- o - o ❑ ❑ ❑ _o ❑ a LEE]a a SOUTH Elevation *No Major Tenant Signs on This Elevation Mosier Sign Progroon Sign, hype I A c Elevations (Building B) Q - Parapet Signage - Major Tenants Sign Location = NORTH Elevation *No Major Tenant Signs on This Elevation LMN WEST Elevation *No Major Tenant Signs on This Elevation Marie ivarun, Parapet Signage - Major Tenants Sign Location SOUTH Elevation �J T-7 - -- -- - - Eo EO — - -- ��. I 61 SOUTH Elevation Expanded View *Tenant can either install on the West or South Elevation but not both Master Sign Program Sign Type Id A - Elevations (Building B) _ Parapet Signage - Major Tenants Sign Location = — ® EAST Elevation to �Y _I Cf) 1 EAST & WEST Elevation Expanded View *Tenant can either install on the West or South Elevation but not both Mask Of 0C grom Sign type 1 A - Elevations (Building C) e Parapet Signage - Major Tenants Sign Location = EAST Elevation *No Major Tenant Signs on This Elevation L` f.-` WEST Elevation o� w �O� O �• EQ. EQ m e I ' EQ O Ln m N m WEST Elevation Expanded View (Left Side) *For this sign location, maximum length is 20' WEST Elevation Expanded View (Right Side) Master Sign pogrom Sign Type 1 A - Elevations (Building C) O - Parapet Signage - Major Tenants Sign Location = CT ------------ --I----L-W.- n, ---------Im. NORTH Elevation *For this sign location, maximum length is 20' 77 `0 ----- ---- o-_ - r F° 0000 NORTH Elevation Expanded View Mast( Program Sign p%pe I A - Elevations (Building C) Parapet Signage - Major Tenants Sign Location TOP OFPARAPET 'D f(e j :FETAL f:iNOFY a INTRY.Ly,- o ® o 0 0 0 0 _-- — - --- -_---- — — — -- FINISH FLOOR SOUTH Elevation *No Major Tenant Signs on This Elevation Master Sign Program Sign Type 1 A - Elevations (Building D) 10 - Parapet Signage - Maior Tenants Sign Location = _ NORTH Elevation 0 LLr o N < 1J" M Jw Lr— L t, LI ——� NORTH Elevation Expanded View IR------ I j I SOUTH Elevation *No Major Tenant Signs on This Elevation Masse Program Sign ogee I A - Elevations (Building D) Qe Parapet Signage - Major Tenants —�`— Sign Location — OP OF PARAPET 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 o c ® ® EAST Elevation i, - EAST Elevation Expanded View ----------L---4----L---I ---------- WEST Elevation *No Major Tenant Signs on This Elevation Master Sign Program Sign Type 1 A - Elevations (Building E) - Parapet Signage - Major Tenants Sign Location ® ® e e NORTH Elevation a W EQ. L 1 L✓ 7 w 24 4J [CCC CC CC L o N LLE m CCC O CC NORTH Elevation Expanded View moste °rogrom Sign sype 1 A o Elevations (Building E) - Parapet Signage - Major Tenants Sign Location = SOUTH Elevation *For this sign location, maximum length is 20' W EQ. 0 El,a SOUTH Elevation Expanded View Maslei 5�qn hoyram Sign Type 1 A a Elevations (Building E) e Parapet Signage - Major Tenants Sign Location TOP PARAPET EAST Elevation ` 1 Q. w i ED 177 L -EIF- 10 aa0 000 EAST Elevation Expanded View Mostf 9rogrum Sign type 1 A e Elevations (Budding E) - Parapet Signage - Major Tenants Sign Location = -- ---- -- - ------- - --- IC-A 7 WEST Elevation *No Major Tenant Signs on This Elevation Master Sign Plograin Plot Han e Sign Type 2C (Monument Signs) e Monument Signs Qty. 2 (Proposed) �I I BuNtlina C 55 450 sfs� 8th StreetB BunalnuE 375_�0 sf Location I 7th Street B.d,D Location 60,580 sf I I T1 I BJdI,9 B / (,, I 99 3599 V i ^ I I IIV1 I I i I / B.Ildh.A I 129.704 0 1 I I I I a Music Progi um zogn dype 2C (Monument Signs) - Monument Signs Qty. 2 (Proposed) 9.00" MONUMENT SIGNS DOUBLE-SIDED -0.50" 1 II - Aluminum canister painted II f co 5; Eli Building standard color Concrete base I! o o {—� 112" & 1/4" thick FCO I o Aluminum with a brushed ! I I aluminum painted finish, post o , I - � mounted lettering II J rCD Dimensions as depicted — *Addresses to be determined - 0.25" -_-- — 51 ® o a o o 0 U o CD X00 ® 00 `- 7,00" i -- - - ---- -- 48.00"---------- -- -- —� i -11 .001; -- - ..- ---- -- - ---- 5 2.00"------- b 0 Mosier Sign Program Plot Plan - Sign Type 3D (Building Address Signs) - Building Address Signs Qty. 10 (Proposed) If ' Buddln9 G e - 5555 d�Osfsl --- - C cC B,Adina E p -- 37 530 5? C c 0 0 c c Buualna o I 60,580— s!s! I / Bulldln�—B 99 35-9 sf / FK a„umoo a 129.704 st I I I I ' / Masie 'rogram Sign type 3D (Building Address Signs) - Building Address Signs Qty. 10 (Proposed) BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNS Building Address Signs shall be made from 4" deep channel letters with internal LED illumination. Numbers will have black trim caps with black painted returns (edges), and 3/16" thick white translucent acrylic faces with a 1/2" black high performance vinyl border added to the face of the acrylic. Numbers shall be 12" (1') tall in all cases and shall be placed at top corner of building elevations in a location easily identified by patrons of the property as well as emergency services. The typestyle/font used shall be "Frit Quadrata Bold" in all cases. Numbers shall be placed at 18" in from edge of building (left or right placement depending on elevation) and 24" from the highest point of the building fascia. Please see examples below for standard placement. FRIZ QUADRATA, BOLD ` ® EXAMPLE-LEFT' PLACEMENT EXAMPLE-RIGHT PLACEMENT J ��ze rJ L( 24" 12" 24" (S O),n O 12" L 5CO -IF 11 --1 Muster Sign Program Sign Type 3D - Installation Detail © - Building Address Signs -- - - --- - --- -- -------- - - - ------- --------- --- -- ----- - -- - -- _ Fabrication/Installation Detail — Electrical Wiring - Typical`\\ I 1 O de_P..u4m tidy:alumrnu.,• (A ---- (NTS) 1 I I I O hirnCcP. I Or n 10.2" crc+rs ono . --------- / I11VDC (non- olai��ed' One I)Power Supply nylon ______ I (min 4 ets r,.r churac,, OW.r,nut coraxchon`tom-econdun \J ______ _____._ 1 t-eo Io LED.IClas`2 la,.-vol;aq ORubber grcnm:et &------ -------- ® % 1 T 1 OF Secondary(eed(ryas 2 low vol.ig;) F ------ --'-------- I iron.nowr.r suPPIY to I&Her � \.`�:�•� �. � � � I 16"th,c!:translucent an yli<face. 1Ilk\ I panel-root•:d 1 OI 12v pow_r supply"ta 01cmmuO1 ___ �\\. \\��\\• _. se-ce box ori dtsconn•;ct sviitci, l J Clo.s 2 LEO li. a------ ---------- @ PrimoiV•o Po.var supply. ______ _________ .`�\�\\•,: 'N..--iss w+-_. a*. Py OTo oedicared rucwf:Al:IOtl-240Y :�' -\jI ®_ J Sp/60h1W. � 'O O ---___ _..__..___M a8 x ":cre,.s lm:n.l per choradul `J t ` \\ 1 G Ornn,holes 1nu1'.1 Pvr lor.es; M ----- /� \ 1 (N ----- 12VDC. (non-polur:zed) Ono;1)Po Nei Supply 1 ----------� OU 1 awn. I Wull rhl,a,n., \ (6 lyp.) —— —————————— ———————— ————————————————————————————— — ———————— — —— ——————————————i Moste 'rogtam Sign type 4E & 4F (Building Entry Signage) 0 - Door Signs © - Window Signs DOOR SIGNAGE WINDOW SIGNAGE Door signs will be made from high performance vinyl and placed on Window signs will be made from high performance vinyl and placed entry doors in one of the two locations as shown. Information on entry windows in one of the two locations as shown. Window sizes displayed shall be limited to 3 lines of copy including tenant may vary by building so graphics shall be centered both horizontally& name/logo, business hours & phone number and shall be no larger vertically on windows in all cases. Information displayed shall be than 2 sq.ft. The maximum height for tenant name/logo shall be 3". limited to tenant name/logo only and shall be no larger than 8 sq.ft. The maximum height for all other copy shall be 1-1/2". No The maximum height for logo shall be 6". The maximum letter height typestyle/font or color restrictions will be enforced, however tenant shall be 4". No typestyle/font or color restrictions will be enforced, information shall contrast the background in all cases. Final approval however tenant information shall contrast the background in all cases. shall be at the sole discretion of the property owner/management. Final approval shall be at the sole discretion of the property owner/management. DOOR SIGNS = WINDOW SIGNS = LOCATION LOCATIO7N LOCATION LOCATION #1 #2 AP, Master Sign Piogrom THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF RANCHO CONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 28, 2014 e 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California FEF-7 I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell_ Vice Chairman Fletcher Munoz_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca_ II. PUBLIC COMM TJNICATIONS- This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. EEIII. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RlcHO MAY 289 2014 CUMMONG& . Page 2 A. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated April 23, 2014 B. Approval of Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) Minutes dated April 23, 2014 C. RECOMMENDATION TO QUITCLAIM VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS FOR LOT 15 OF TRACT MAP 9324, ALONG CARNELIAN STREET, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET SOUTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD—APN: 1061-671-28. RELATED FILE: DRC2014-00030. D. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15. IV. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION E. ORAL UPDATE TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ON THE RESTORATION OF THE CUCAMONGA SERVICE STATION LOCATED AT 9670 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD—APN: 0208-153-05. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014- 00205 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A supplement to Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) amending Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to clarify definitions,administrative procedures and correct prior errors and omissions. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19505 - ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC - A request to subdivide a 0.29 acre parcel into two lots for a site located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue in the Low(L) Residential Development District; APN: 0209-122-01. Related File: Variance DRC2014-00112. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANcw MAY 289 2014 l:UCAMONCA Page 3 . H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2014-00112-ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC - A request for a variance to reduce the minimum net average lot size in connection with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue in the Low(L)Residential Development District-APN: 0209-122-01. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19518-DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC: A proposal to subdivide a property comprised of nine(9)parcels with a combined area of about 375,000 square feet (8.61 acres) into three (3) parcels in conjunction with the modification of a previously approved industrial/warehouse complex in the General Industrial(GI)District located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-39 and -41 through -48. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00551 and SUBTPM18794 was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2010. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-01118, Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01118-DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC: A review of proposed modifications to a previously approved industrial/warehouse complex and architectural review of three(3)buildings on a property of about 904,000 square feet(20.7 acres)in the General Industrial(GI) District located about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street;APNs: 0209-151-38 through-48. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00551 and SUBTPM18794 was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2010. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration Related files: Development Review DRC20070- 00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-01120. K. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT DRC2013-01120 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC: A modification of Uniform Sign Program #221 for a partially constructed industrial/warehouse complex on a property of 20.7 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-38 through -48. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-0118, Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Minor Exception DRC2008-00152. VI. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MAY 289 2014 Page 4 VII. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee,hereby certify that a true,accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 22, 2014,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speakers podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA �HO MAY 289 2014 Page 5 APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us VicinityMap Historic Preservation and -Planning Commission Meeting May 28 , 2014 r..J I i •-•--• o E o AC I iZ 1 CL LCL N I V t C FE 19�St Base Line Base Line J Church 1 Church Foothill Foothill N C A Arrow � E � `� 1 Arrow C m o C niey t 8th o DC w 1 S 6th w C L � Alt _ = g 4th FE Meeting Location: J �` H City Hall/Council Chambers 10500 Clvlc Center Drive Item A: Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated April 23, 2014 Item B: Approval of Adjourned meeting Minutes dated April 23, 2014 Item D: Capital Improvement Program (citywide) Item E: Oral Report—Historic Gas Station Item F: Development Code Amendment(citywide) Items G, H, : SUBTPM19605, DRC2014-00112 Itpmc I. .L K- SIIRTPM19_1R nPr7n1n.A11R r1Rf_9A1't.f1119n SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING vcxo C',UCAMONGA MAY 28, 2014 NAME COMPANY ADDRESS/EMAIL #467 l I Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Capital ram Improvement Program g Presented by: City of Rancho Cucamonga g Engineering Services Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Tel: 909.477.2740 I Fax: 909.477.2741 www.cityofrc.com 1 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 SUMMARY Categories Budgeted Unfunded General Plan:Policy Reference A. Beautification........................... (1) $ 400,000 $ - GP:CM-3.10,CM-3.11,PS-12.7 B. Drainage.................................. (1) $ 35,000 $ - GP:CM-4.4,CM-3.7 C. Facilities................................... (11) $ 1,675,000 $ 22,050,000 GP: ED-3.1,PF-1.1,PF-1.4, PF-1.5 D. Miscellaneous.......................... (4) $ 748,810 $ 719,360 GP:CM-1.4,CM-2.1,CM-3.7, CS-6.3, E. Municipal Utility..................... LU-11.2,PS-12.4 (1) $ 461,000 $ - GP:PF-1.4,RC-4.2 F. Parks........................................ (8) $ 878,170 $ 3,635,087 GP:CS-1.8,PF-1.4 G. Railroad Crossings.................. (2) $ 1,300,500 $ 75,000 GP:CM-1.2,CM-4.4 H. Streets...................................... (25) $ 4,430,300 $ 20,176,200 GP:CM-1.1,CM-2.1,CM-4.4, ED-4.3 I. Traffic....................................... (4) $ 717,500 $ 287,500 GP:CM-4.1,CM-4.2 TOTAL............................... (57) $ 10,646,280 $ 46,943,147 J. Future& Unfunded Projects.... (21) $ 88,955,500 GP:CM-1.1,CM-4.4,CS-1.8, ED-3.1, PS-12.4 i I I I I I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 No. Project Fund Account Amount(E) A. Beautification 1 LMD 4R-Water Conservation and Landscape Renovations LMD 411 11343035650/1787134-0 400,000 (Mufti-Phased Project) Beautification UnFunded Total: 0 B. Drainage Beautification funded Total: 4001000; 1 Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria Park Lane-Drainage Improvement General Drainage 11123035650/1874112-0 31000 Drainage UnFunded Total: 0 C. Facilities Drainage Funded Total: ." 31000' 1 City Facilities-Roofing Survey Capital Reserve 1025001-5300 41000 2 Civic Center-Landscape Renovation Capital Reserve 1025001-5607 240,000 3 Civic Center-Parking and Exterior Lighting Capital Reserve 1025001-5607 140,000 4 Civic Center-Roof System Restoration/Patio Replacement Capital Reserve 10250015850/1892025-0 780,000 5 Cultural Arts Center-Exterior Joint Repairs Capital Reserve 1025001565011890025-0 21000 6 Fire District-Jersey Station 174 Training Facility Fire Capital Projects 32885015850/1735288-0 50,000 (Design,with Construction FY15/18 if funds are available) Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1735288-0 15.000.000 15,050,000 7 Paul A.Biane Library-2nd Floor Rancho KIDS Project Library Capital Fund 13296015650/1887329-0 220,000 (Construction funded FY15/16 to FY16/17-multi-phased) Library Capital Fund 13296015650/1867329-0 7"050.000 7,270,000 8 Public Safety Building-HVAC IACI Law Enforcement Reserve 10177015650/1893017-0 100,000 9 Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center-Relocation Park Development 11203055650/1896120-0 30,000 10 Victoria Gardens Cultural Center-Courtyard Redesign Capital Reserve 10250015850/1894025-0 11000 CFD 2003-01 Cultural Ctr 16153035850/1894615-0 jjyje 20,000 11 Victoria Gardens Cultural Center-Loading Bay Capital Reserve 10250015650/1895025-0 21000 Facilities UnFunded Total: 22,050,000 D. Miscellaneous Facilities Funded Total::`'_.;1,87Sy000; 1 Arrow Route Utility Underground-Bear Gulch to West of Archibald Ave Underground Utilities 11293035650/1777129-0 1,000 (Continuation of Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Underground Utilities 11293035650/1777129-0 719.360 720,360 2 Base Line Rd Utility Underground-Camelian St to Vineyard Ave Underground Utilities 11293035850/1776129-0 554570 3 Bus Stop Pads at Various Locations Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1623174-0 14840 Ped Granit Article 3 12143035650/1823214-0 74.800 93,240 4 Illuminated Street Name Sign Upgrade Gas Tax 11703035650/1693170-0 100,000 Miscellaneous UnFunded Total: 719,360 E. Municipal Utility-Electrical Miscellaneous Funded Total. ", 748.810? 1 Haven Ave Electric Line Extension from 6th St.to 8th St. Municipal Utility 17053035650/1883705-0 461,000 Municipal Utility UnFunded Total: 0 Municipal Utility Funded Total: 481,000; )I ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2014115 No. Project Fund Account Amount(S) F. Parks 1 Central Park-Outdoor Improvements Park Development 11203055650/18711200 Sq 000 2 Central Park-Pavillion Phase II Improvements Park Development 11203055650/1803120-0 82250 3 Etiwanda Creek Park-Sidewalk Improvements Park Development 11203055650/1861120-0 250,000 4 Park Playground ADA and CPSC Improvements LMD 4R 11343035650/1860134-0 150,000 5 Park Playground Rubberized Surface Maintenance LMD 4R 1134303-5607 14000 6 Park Playground Seat Wall LMD 4R 1134303-5607 8,720 7 Southwest Cucamonga Park-New Park Prop 84 State Grant 12353055650/1754235-0 283,500 (Continuation of Design,construction FY 15/16) Prop 84 State Grant 12353055650/1754235-0 3.635.087 3,918,587 8 Various Parks within LMD 4-Ballfield Fence and Curb Replacement LMD 4R 1134303-5607 37,700 Parks UnFunded Total: 3,635,087 Parks Funded Total: ::;:;'"".878,1701 G. Railroad Crossings 1 Amow Route at Railroad Spur-New Concrete Panels Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1819174-0 300 (Design,with Construction FY15/16 if funds are available) Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1819174-0 75.000 75,500 2 Heilman Avenue at Metrolink Tracks-Widen Crossing Transportation 11243035650/1847124-0 654000 (Design and Construction) Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1847198-0 630.000 1,300,000 Railroad Crossings UnFunded Total: 75,000 Railroad Crossings Funded Total: H. Streets 1 4th Street from Archibald to Haven-North Side Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1853177-0 500 (Continuation of Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Measure 1 11773035850/1853177-0 305.000 Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 305,500 2 6th Street from Hermosa to Haven-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1649174-0 300,000 (Construction).Note: possible CalRecycle 2 Rebate 3 7th St from Hellman to Archibald-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 1174303565011876174-0 20,000 (Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1876174-0 250.000 Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 270,000 4 8th Street from Baker to Hellman-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1851174-0 300,000 (Construction).Note: possible CalRecycle,2 Rebate 5 9th Street west of Vineyard-Sidewalk Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1808198-0 24000 Improvements(Design and.Constnu tion) Safe Rte To School Grant 1234303565011808234-0 go, Note:SRTS Federal Cycle 3 Grant 115,800 6 19th Street from West City Limit to Haven-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11763035650/1836176-0 474,000 (Construction).Note: possible CalRecycle 2 Rebate Measure 1 11773035650/1836177-0 1,375 000 7 Archibald Ave from 4th to Foothill-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1852177-0 500 (Continuation of Design,with Construction funded FYI 5/16) Measure 1 11773035650/1852177-0 1,201,000 Nate: possible CalRecyde 3 Rebate 1,201,500 I (�0 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2014115 No. Project Fund Account Amount(5) 8 Archibald Ave from Hillside to North City Limit-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 1177303565011727177-0 Soo (Continuation of Design,with Construction funded FYI 5/16) Measure 1 11773035650/1727177-0 550.000 Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 550,500 9 Baker St from Main to Foothill-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1869177-0 310,000 (Construction).Note: possible CalRecycle 2 Rebate 10 Base Line Rd-at 1-15 Interchange Transportation 11243035650/1361124-0 200,000 (Continuation of Construction) 11 Camelian St from Lemon Ave to Wilson Ave-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1722177-0 500 (Continuation of Survey and Design,with Construction funded FYI 5/18) Measure 1 11773035650/1722177-0 500.000 Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 500,500 12 Etiwanda Ave from 6th St to Arrow Route-Widening Transportation 11243035650/1076124-0 71000 (Conceptual Plan) Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1076198-0 21% 100,000 13 Foothill Blvd across SCE Corridor West of Day Creek Channel-Sidewalk Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1826198-0 143,000 Improvements(Survey,Design and Construction) 14 Foothill Blvd from Vineyard to Archibald-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1855177-0 500 (Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Measure 1 11773035650/1855177-0 802.000 Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 802,500 15 Haven Ave from Wilson to North City Limit-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1854177-0 Soo (Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY 15/16) Measure 1 11773035650/1854177-0 750,000 Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 750,500 16 Hellman Ave from Base Line Rd to 19th St-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1816174-0 410,000 (Construction).Note: possible CalRecyde 2 Rebate 17 Hermosa Ave from Banyan to Wilson-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1815174-0 500 (Continuation of Design,with Construction FYI 5/16 if funds are available) Unknown m0000000000815xxx-0 260.000 Related to Hermosa storm drain 260,500 18 Lemon Ave from Archibald to Haven-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1793174-0 500 ' (Continuation of Design,with Construction FYI 7/18 it funds are available) Unknown X00000000ood1793xxx-0 580.000 Related to Lemon storm drain 560,500 19 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation at Various Locations Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1022174-0 850,000 (Survey,Design and Construction) Prop 42 11903035650/1022190-0 109.000 ' 959,000 20 Madrone Ave North of 9th St-Widening with Southwest Cucamonga Park Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035850/1818174-0 Soo (Continuation of Survey and Design,with Construction funded FYI 5/16) Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1818174-0 127.200 127,700 21 Rochester from Foothill Blvd to Base Line Rd-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1821177-0 Soo (Continuation of Design,with Construction funded FYI 6/17) Measure 1 11773035650/1821177-0 590.000 590,500 22 San Bernardino Rd from Camelian to Archibald-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1877174-0 20,000 (Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1877174-0 275.000 Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 295,000 23 Spruce Ave from Foothill to Base Line-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1878174-0 30,000 (Survey and Design,with Construction funded FYI 5116) Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1878174-0 600.000 Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 630,000 24 Victoria Street from Etiwanda to East City Limit-Widening and Pavement Transportation 11243035650/1838124-0 500 ' Rehabilitation(Continuation of Design,with Construction funded FY 15/16) Measure 1 1176303565011838176-0 350,000 Transportation 11243035650/1838124-0 513.000 406,500 25 Youngs Canyon Road from Koch Place to Cherry Ave-Street Extension AD 88-2 Ebwanda/Highlnd 18133035650/1601813-0 100,000 (Environmental,conceptual design and Flood Control basins review/study) AD 88-2 Etiwanda/Highlnd 18133035650/1801813-0 13.000.000 13,100,000 Streets UnFunded Total: 20,178,200 Streets Funded Total: 1,130,3001 IV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2014115 No. Project Fund Account Amount(E) 1. Traffic 1 8th St at Utica Ave-Traffic Signal Installation Transportation 11243035650/1889124-0 12500 Transportation 11243035650/1889124-0 287.500 300,000 2 Camelian St at Banyan St-Traffic Signal Installation Transportation 11243035650/1887124-0 300,000 3 Milliken Ave and Day Creek Blvd Traffic Signals-Upgrade Left Tum Phases Transportation 1124303565011875124-0 125,000 4 Traffic Management Center-Upgrade Project Citywide Transportation 1124303565011831124-0 280,000 Traffic UnFunded Total: 287,500 Traffic Funded Total: 717,500,4 J. Future&Unfunded Projects 1 Archibald Ave from Church to Palo Alto-Storm Drain Unknown )000000000a/1805)=-O 1,215,000 (Design and Construction) 2 Archibald Ave from N/O Norbrook to Canari St-Community Trail West Side Unknown m000000000r/1830xxx-0 103,000 (Continuation of Design,with Construction FYI 6/17 if funds are available) 3 Central Park-Replace Flooring Capital Reserve 1025001-5295 125,000 4 Civic Center-Earthquake Strapping Capital Reserve 1025001-)o= 50,000 5 Civic Center and Public Safety Building-ADA Assessment of Exterior Doors Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 20,000 6 Etiwanda Ave Electric Line Extension from Arrow to Foothill Municipal Utility 17053035650/1885705-0 602,500 7 Etiwanda Ave-Grade Separation at Metrolink Tracks Unknown xioc0000000r/1076xxx-0 40,000,000 8 EtJwanda Creek Park-Phase II Park Development 1120305565011664120-0 5,580,000 9 Fire District-Banyan Station 175 Expansion Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1779288-0 2,500,000 10 Fire District-Central Station 178(New Fire Station) Fire Capital Projects 3288501565011645288-0 8,000,000 11 Fire District-Operation/Dispatch Building Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1392288-0 11,000,000 12 Fire District-San Bernardino Station 172 Relocation Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1733288-0 6,500,000 13 Foothill Blvd from Grove Ave to San Bernardino Rd-Widening with Median Unknown :oo000000oor/1189xxx-0 4,630,000 Island including Landscaped Median to Vineyard (Right-of-Way and Construction) 14 Haven Ave from Wilson to Vivienda-Community Trail on the West Side Unknown 4ww0000a/1829xxx-0 125,000 f (Continuation of Design,with Construction FYI 5/16 if funds are available) 15 Hermosa Ave from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson-Storm Drain Unknown ro000000000111810xxx-0 2,245,000 (Continuation of Design,with Construction FYI 5/16 if funds are available) Related to Hermosa pavement rehabilitation 16 Lemon Avenue from Haven to 1300 feet west-Storm Drain Unknown 1791xxx-0 1,700,000 (Continuation of Design,with Construction FY17/18 if funds are available) Related to Lemon pavement rehabilitation 17 Miller Ave at East Ave-New Traffic Signal Installation Transportation 11243035650/1888124-0 300,000 18 Pacific Electric Trail Enhancements-West to East City Limits Beautification 11103165850/1775110-0 10,000 Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1775198-0 100.000 110,000 --• 19 Red Hill Park-Pedestrian.Paseo PD 85 Redemption '— ","'184830356501162164" 100,000 20 Safety Lighting-Upgrades at Various Intersections Transportation 11243035650/1842124-0 150,000 21 Upper Cucamonga Storm Drain Phase III-East of Hellman to Base Line to Unknown Unknown 3,900,000 Roberds,North on Amethyst to 19th St,and Easterly 300 feet Future&Unfunded Total: 88,955,500: V Beautification Typical Beautification projects include parkway landscape, median islands, plant material replacement, community trail landscape and open space preservation. The City strives to plan and budget for projects that exemplify Rancho Cucamonga's aesthetic standards, particularly in areas of the City that are older and undergoing rehabilitation. Many Beautification projects bring these areas into alignment with the rest of the City. The City adheres to a Xeriscape policy in all of its plant material selection, ensuring current water conservation stand- ards, as well as the adaptability of plants, trees, flowers and shrubs to Southern California's warm and dry climate. This practice helps to reduce ongoing maintenance and irrigation costs. Beautification projects are typically funded via the Beautification Fund (110), which is a product of new residential and commercial development fees. Other examples of funding include Park Development, Capital Reserves and Park and Landscape Maintenance District funds. Project List& FY 2014-15 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 1. LMD 4R Water Conservation and $400,000 Landscape Renovations Total $400,000 $400,000 ■ LMD 4R A Project Number: 1L Key: 1787 Object: LMD 4-Water Conservation/Landscape Renovation Study S U-15, a u ate, L eSYt c ul Project Location: _ LMD4 Lf ) 3 d t ' <, NA ( ,' AMES BRULTE SENIOR NTEP RANCHO CUCAI GA" NTRk9AR ! OLDY LEWIS COMMUNI ENTER C� LJ ' 00 Est.Construction Start/End: / / OTE AN ON PA RRA v t July 2014—June 2015TENT J�. �� MENT ( jT)� THD£ i C`� Project Status: U ROJEC. I ZO.CATION. ' SPRUCE- C W1 Design/Construction �,�''; T Pa J y. MI WEN P RK `< �y �XOYO ON N.EL N ARV. ��✓" Department: — \\ 11 3 Public Works Services " ��` L A&LEW1 K Project Manager: _ Dean Rodia Description: The replacement of thirsty high maintenance turf and vegetation with low water use landscaping that meets the need to conserve resources,reduce maintenance costs,while providing landscape alternatives to the surrounding community. Justification: The new landscaping wil reduce maintenance costs and water use requirements. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 50 $0 $0 $o 50 Design/Plan Review $27,560 50 50 5o $0 50 $27,560 Right-of-Way $o $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction 50 $360,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $360,000 Inspection&Administration So 54,000 $0 5o $o $0 $4,000 Contingency $0 $36,000 $0 $0 SO 50 $36,000 Total Costs: $27,560 $400,000 50 $o $0 $0 $427,560 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL LIVID 411 Terra Vista(134) $27,560 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $427,560 ITotal Costs: $27,560 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $427,560 Impact on Operations: There will be disruptions when the existing landscaping is removed and new landscaping installed. However, once completed,maintenance and irrigation costs will be much lower. Al Drainage Drainage projects include the construction of new storm drains, storm drain lateral connections, flood control channels, catch basins, debris racks and other forms of infrastructure that protect the public right-of-way from hazards caused by flooding and severe weather events. Drainage projects are scheduled and planned due to the availability of funding, safety concerns, new development, and weather/emergency events. In extreme circumstances, inadequate drainage can prevent development from taking place. The City consults with many other agencies when constructing new drainage improvements, including utility companies, the Cucamonga Valley Water District, the San Bernardino Flood Control District and the Army Corps of Engineers, as needs dictate. Drainage projects are typically funded from Drainage Funds and eligible street funding sources such as Measure I or Gas Tax. Project List& FY 2014-15 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 I. Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria Park $35,000 $35,000 Lane—Drainage Improvements Total $35,000 General Drainage B Project Number: J L Key: 1874 Object: Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria Park Lane- Drainage Improvement �. Project Location: _ Li cucaR::uc�sr Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria —�; YI 1�I yA1ry 1NF Park Lane J f= If L " W I I1� �^_• y wig�I,R�¢ \Q�IHpIy�ARN 7R I C � ���� PACIFIC BLEC'RIC-.RAIL I j FIRE 173 i I Il Est.Construction Start/End: II ' 10/2014-11/2014 e1RfMOUSE�• f � ( a, 1`• .� � ���- �, BER;ItANO C•I Project Status: Design ��� �' �l �. ` ✓ '= J( �� PROJ�.C:T LOCATION } Department: Il -I Engineering z' 1 SE LINE RD G Y `w� r n ' Project Manager: II Walt Stickney ; Description: Drainage improvement along the Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria Park Lane. Justification: Currently when it rains erosion occurs along the trail and the slope at Victoria Park Lane. The drainage improvement will pick-up the flows and divert them to a storm drain and eliminating the erosion. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 50 Design/Plan Review $0 $3,500 s0 $0 $0 $0 $3,500 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 $0 I Construction $0 $27,000 $0 SO $0 $0 $27,000 Inspection&Administration So $1,800 $0 5o $0 $0 $1,800 Contingency $0 $2,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,700 Total Costs: $0 $35,000 $0 50 5D 50 $35,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL General Drainage(112) $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 Total Costs: $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 Impact on Operations: Elimination of the drainage flows will eliminate the costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and freeing up Imaintenance crews to attend to other areas. i B1 C . t' i'JILAIL-21 Facilities - Projects that construct new buildings or that either improve, add on to, or renovate existing buildings and ancillary structures are typically classified as Facilities Projects. These projects ultimately result in new structures being added to the City's fixed facility inventory; however, some projects placed in this category are considered capital rehabilitation as they focus on the remodeling or restoration of existing facilities. The majority of these projects are funded via City Reserve funds. Major projects may qualify for state, federal and/or grant funding. Typical operating expenses for facilities include increases in staffing, building and systems maintenance costs, overhead expenses and utilities. Project List& FY 2014-15 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 $50.000 1. City Facilities-Roofing Survey $45,000 $220,000 2. Civic Center-Landscape Renova- $240,000 tion 3. Civic Center-Prkg and Exterior $140,000 $100,000 Lighting $5,000 4. Civic Center-Roof System Resto- $780,000 $30,000 ration/Patio Replacement 5. Cultural Arts Center-Exterior $25,000 Joint Repairs 6. Fire District-Jersey Station 174 $50,000 $1,270,000 Training Facility 7. Paul A. Biane Library-2nd Floor $220,000 Rancho KIDS Project Capital Reserves �]Fire Capital Projects 8. Public Safety Building-HVAC IAQ $100,000 9. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports $30,000 ■Library Capital Fund CFD 2003-01 Cultural Ctr Ctr—Relocation 10.Victoria Gardens Cultural Ctr- $20,000 ■Park Development Courtyard Redesign 11.Victoria Gardens Cultural Ctr- $25,000 ■Law Enforcement Reserve Loading Bay Total $1,675,000 C Project Number: JL Key: Object: 5300 City Facilities- Roofing Survey Project Location: "� J All City facilities except City Hall and City Yard Building •!CAR CIR, f 'I�I �`1 I + :� , FtIL` " Lsloe-RD�' i' ( 3 �L[,N Iq na a 4 Ir_,,-I LS-' W 4 `WI-Se N•AVC�' L �. IL-S�O{N-GVE--�tS°y 1. VL �r,PLLL Z r•Z'L_ ,I�n „¢- I C:� ANVAN�5;I AV - ff•r'Z:� �j?s^' I°rosunUR c76 3: ' r"J„. .1.'><j I"!Grt•AM1D 4Vt'wr 1.71 �o—o-W >R 1 710 '4 - .n• `veers — ¢yTT� Est.Construction StartEnd: TH.S-z �� r> r FEeA`} July 2014-June 2015 0 ld. LC�;GEIT�:O �..Y�-��_._.. T -IF:i<.-��+ 41i-:T:-�-T, .P,'q'41F7L'rL'LC.t•TAIf�f SIL t�� -:f&FAC1FFr4'C EO L=I RAIL r6A'S UNEFU �H��-�'tl,{f{' r•1).�.= � Fi � ....•-a..,-_._.....- ... G 4W.~JJJ W �_ 'L Project Status rewL�A I u t c��l �tzr ✓y} ,y. L.':.�,,:J�y-�.-.. Design i`Y• �5= 1I-, = 'NILL'fRA F �F r I I 1^ .f1,lrII INVW�Inl,5T���a- rOd'7NILi-DL•V W- EV.4. Department: Sr j✓� r. r - ! RIO -R-7E +na Public Works Services jj 1�` x TMST �- �(,�1`7 Al > JERSE�-BLVD,_ 11 TT MAVE •�,'!rIS•rte'•=.. JIdN-g-7 � � � TATM! � I _TD I —67n5-7 Project Manager: L�T'I"Q._,•!j, T �rt'1'G '�•a m Z Ty Quaintance Description: Select consultant to evaluate the existing roof systems at most City facilities. Consultant will prepare a report outlining current conditions of each facility roof, list deficiencies and recommend solutions along with a maintenance plan as well as prepare bid specifications. Justification: The City is preparing a program to bring all City facilities into compliance with the requirements of the Title 24 building Efficiency Standards. Cool roof,which saves both money and energy became a part of Title 24 in October 2005. In addition,there is a need to develop an accurate assessment of the existing roof systems to allow for proper budget forecasting and management. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Construction 5o $o 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 IContingency So $0 50 $0 $o $0 $o Total Costs: $0 $45,000 $0 So $0 $0 $45,000 ' Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Captial Reserve(025) $o $45,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $45,000 Total Costs: So S45,000 $o W ;r. $0 $45,000 I Impact on Operations: No impact on operations while facilities are being evaluated. However,once all City facilities have met the Title 24 Cool Roof requirements,the facilities heating costs will be reduced significantly. Because these roofs are comprised of a highly reflective and emissive roofing material, cool roofs are on average 50 to 60 degrees cooler than an average roof. C1 Project Number: 1L Key: Object: 5607 Civic Center- Landscape Renovation 1 Project Location: 7aEF�trm sx �� / Civic Center N LL roorH 1 I W IL q� Q ::/WAP'< 1RF S7F3 I ✓�i^�UitLL—".,.I Est.Construction Start/End: I iz July 2014—June 2015 �4 ci TY HALL 1I i q'=C¢V,O`rf.57_� IK d&OLICE STATION Project Status; c CIVIC:,ENI.E R..! C cKAP'ARRAI INA t Design/Construction s PROJECT LOCATIO ` / 1 Department: !� axe.t.n u.Eso nR m Public Works ServicesL--J1 I Q; a z Project Manager: ARROW R r Dean Rodia Description: The design and replacement of thirsty,high maintenance turf&vegetation with low water use landscaping that meets the need to conserve resources and reduce maintenance costs,while providing landscaping alternatives to the surrounding community. Justification: The new landscaping will significantly reduce maintenance costs and water use requirements along with establishing a landscape conservation show piece for the community and future development. Work will start at perimeter and turf areas. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 201415 2015/16 201617 201718 201819 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $19,730 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $59,730 Right-of-Way $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 5180,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $180,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 Contingency $o $18,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $18,000 Total Costs: $19,730 $240,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $259,730 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) $19,730 $240,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $259,730 Total Costs: $19,730 $240,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $259,730 Impact on Operations: There will be disruptions when the existing landscaping is removed and new landscaping installed. However,once completed,maintenance and irrigation costs will be much lower. C 2 IProject Number: 1L Key: I Object: 5607 Civic Center- Parking and Exterior Lighting Project Location: ) I,:'-- I � f! I Civic Center Z LL ' 1:00 1 H w a 2; w —HAM-. � N�O1UItLLJT� Q' Est.Construction Start/End: July 2014—June 2015 w I ix CITY HALL IC-CES-aK`�-T_+ COOLICE STATION 1,•�1/ Project Status: C.-- CIV1C-CENTER W CHAPARRAL WAY Design in FY13/14 = Const in FY 14/15 PROJECT LOCATIO i II /r Department: o�cFl_a ear aA nR Public Works Services a, a' Project Manager: < ARROW R' 1 Ty Quaintance s°rycln;;,�R Description: Replace the existing City Hall parking lot light fixtures with solar powered LED lighting fixtures. There will also be an additive bid for replacing the landscaping lighting. ' Justification: Currently,there are forty eight(48)-250 watt HPS lighting fixtures in the City Hall parking lots. These fixtures total twelve thousand (12,000)watts. The new 140 watt LED fixtues require only six thousand seven hundred(6,700)watts. Project Cost Estimate($): Expend iture/Ca teeory Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $30,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $30,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $30,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 Project Funding: IFunding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Captial Reserve(025) $30,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 ITotal Costs: $30,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 Impact on Operations: Minimal-There will be some temporary parking restrictions while lighting fixtures are being removed and replaced. I The new fixtures will require less electricity and have a longer service life so both maintenance and utility costs will be reduced. I C3 Project Number: 1L Key: 1892 Object: Civic Center-Roof System Restoration and Patio Replacement Project Location: FFSlRIT_5r Civic Center 1 ILL 1141 ( h4MG�li�RF..�jT� IU�LFi UlILS.I� IC! ' Est.Construction Start/End: _ July 2014—June 2015 I, I / TY'1AL \� a Y �R4OLICE STATION � 1 Project Status: • W C.1(A[•ARRAL WAY Phase 1 in FY13/14 _ Phase 2 in FY14/15 PROJECT LOCATIO Department: c.tpl N MF SA DR H Public Works Services a�- ;Q w m Project Manager: < ARROW � 1I s i Ty Quaintance Description: Roof Restoration(phase 1)-install Title 24 Compliant&Energy Star compliant high-build white reflective roof coating and flashing. Patio Replacement(phase 2)-remove&replace patio surface and waterproofing system. Justification: Roof Restoration(phase 1)will make the City Hall roof compliant with the new Title 24 Cool Roof requirements.Patio Replacement (phase 2)will seal all penetrations and joints to prevent water intrusion. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 so so 50 s0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $30,000 $o 50 50 $0 50 $30,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 So $0 5o 50 $0 Construction $220,000 $780,000 $0 so so 50 $1,000,000 Inspection&Administration $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 Total Costs: $270,000 $780,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 51,050,000 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Captial Reserve(025) $270,000 $780,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $1,050,000 ITotal Costs: $270,000 $780,000 s0 $0 50 50 51,050,000 Impact on Operations: Minimal-work will occur when City Hall is closed. Contractor to start work at 7:00 pm and be off site by 6:00 am. Except Wednesday nights(City Council and Planning Commission meetings)when the contractor cannot start work until 11:30 pm. Patio demolition will occur during weekend. C4 Project Number: JL Key: 1890 Object: Cultural Arts Center-Exterior Joint Repairs Project Location: o ' Victoria Gardens Cultural Center _J cc U '} a 5 wlbu rloRs[_wiiY Q t .� I z u I G L--rJRALFtE'?F4 H IJ VICTORIA GAR S CULTURAL CENTER W/t / PAUIIBIANELI�BF RY® W Est.Construction Start/End: �R+rrJ.n+al_ TRLr,r July 2014—June 2015 s _fit+=r,AINS'r�REE•T Project Status: - V' z Construction F z a it LL i PRUOJEC°F �OCATION MRSAIL, ;.SS_ <=YE KSAIL'L°L.". . Department: ' Public Works Services U RDE VIC—TOKIA--AENS-L-N ' Project Manager: c Ty Quaintance J m ell, Z"/ ' Description: Select a consultant to evaluate the existing condition of the exterior elastomeric joint seals and expansion joints. The consultant will then prepare bid specifications and an engineer's estimate for the needed repairs. ' Justification: The seals and joints are showing signs of failure due to weathering. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPOES $0 50 $0 $0 50 50 $o Design/Plan Review $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $50,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 So $0 50 50 Construction $0 SO $0 $0 $0 50 SO Inspection&Administration So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Contingency $0 5o $0 $0 50 $0 $0 Total Costs: $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $50,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Captial Reserve(025) 525,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Total Costs: $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Impact on Operations: None-Victoria Gardens Cultural Center will remain fully operational while consultant performs evaluation. I C5 Project Number: A Key: 1735 Object: Fire District-Jersey Station (174)Training Facility Project Location: I , FU&0rrc r C;�c� J Behind Jersey Fire Station (174) and the Fire Maintenance Facility =� N ` JERSE. BLVD FIRE-STA•TI O on Jersey Blvd. E , FF u METROL9NK-SiA7fpN� b-•'�'�' 0 1, � A• =l_CCIA-STS 4 �� t Est.Construction Start/End: > ? .� , I nAY_rou Jft 2015/16 -2016/17 a c I) l 7TH=S.. PIRE LAKES GOLF COU I I J ..i:sS_W 2 a z— • = W Project Status: W m a P .OJE LO ATibm T. Design i I I 15 J C Department: ; W Y J Fire Protection District J � 'a EIVI E LAKES GOLF COURSE z d Project Manager: AARII.-S.1 I F I Sn"•ST i Chief CloughesV/Pamela Pane J/ rnissloN-ulsaoR �LL : Description: Architect approved by the Fire Board on December 18,2013,for Phase 1 of the Architectural Design Services. Justification: A training facility has been included in the current and previous Strategic Plan and has been part of the Jersey Station Master Plan since its inception. Several multi-story hotels have been constructed and additional mid-rise professional officesare proposed in the future necessitating this training tower. It will include expanded classrooms, a live burn building, multi-story training building and other props. Project Cost Estimate(S): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 $0 50 SO $0 50 Design/Plan Review $777,920 550,000 50 SO $0 50 $827,920 Right-of-Way $0 So So So So So $0 Construction $0 So $15,000,000 $0 $0 50 $15,000,000 Inspection&Administration $0 50 50 $0 So 50 So Contingency So $0 So $0 5o 50 $0 Total Costs: $777,920 $50,000 $15,000,000 $0 50 $0 $15,827,920 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Fire Capital Projects(288) $777,920 $50,000 $15,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,827,920 Total Costs: $777,920 550,000 $15,000,000 SO $0 $0 $15,827,920 Impact on Operations: Fire District operations and maintenance cost will increase. The cost will be better determined after the design phase is complete. Opportunities may exist for regional partnerships that could help effect operational costs. C6 Project Number: JL Key: 1867 Object: Paul A. Biane Library-Second Floor Rancho KIDS Project Project Location: �L ,131v 12505 Cultural Center Drive z ENTLKUH VICTORIA aARDENS CU LTl�o 4l GE 11 ITER t - >: �// PAULI WANE LIBRARY z 4, _N 5: LL..1 Est.Construction Start/End: FY 2014/15 to complete design �j5tl I AINWIFRE drawings and establish II W z construction cost estimates. cr ll VERSAI I . EStSLL R0 T11 Elmo-11- L -:.:!�!D M-_ _4 - .g-==XVL Project Status: 1 Design VIC GT11A ARDFIV5,—E—N— Department: Library Project Manager: Robert Karatsu Description: Rancho KIDS is a project that will build out the second floor of the Paul A. Biane Library at Victoria Gardens. Rancho KIDS is envisioned as an interactive children', museum combined with traditional library services to create a new type of learning experience. Design and cost estimates of the second floor has been established as a City Council goal for FY 2014-15. Justification: Demand for library services in the community continues to increase,particularly for the ages 0-7. Rancho KIDS is being designed to provide a new,unique service model that will combine the features of interactive children's museum exhibits with traditional library services. Rancho KIDS should also be a regional draw that will provide additional visitors to both the Victoria Gardens Shopping District and the Lewis Family Playhouse. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 so so so so $0 $o Design/Plan Review $90,000 $200,000 $750,000 $o $o $o $1,040,000 Right-of-Way $o $0 $o $0 $0 $o so Construction $0 $0 $2,500,000 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $6,000,000 Inspection&Administration so $0 $o $0 so $0 $0 Contingency $0 $20,000 $0 $300,000 $o $0 $320,000 Total Costs: $90,000 $220,000 $3,250,000 $3,900,000 $0 $0 $7,360,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Library Services Fund(329) $90,000 $220,000 $3,250,000 $3,800,000 $0 $o $7360,000 Total Costs: $90,000 $220,000 $3,250,000 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $7,360,000 Impact on Operations: Feasibility study projects an approximate$300,000 per year cost for operations and maintenance. (The project is designed to be revenue-generating.) C7 ' Project Number: . JL Key: 1893 Object: Public Safety Building- HVAC IAQ Project Location: Public Safety Building i N FUUIM qi 2; S— `riSk6KMIRF-.4T=1 End: 'a Est.Construction Start/ .Z ll� J July 2014—June 2015 ?J; w Y CITY MALL •.. / u- E)0'WS.T__ �OLICE STA"n Project Status: y --- CIvJCXENTER ' C CMAFWFRAL WAy { Construction \,%\v% \ PROJECT LOCATION-JI Department: F N RIF%A OR lay Public Works Services � a m ' Project Manager: — — a ARROW R T i Ty Quaintance i soon❑"'��k Description: Mechanical design and specifications for altering Air Handlers 1 and 2 which are located in the Public Safety building. Justification: The intake and exhaust systems of Air Handlers 1 and 2 need to be redone to meet current standards. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 50 $0 5o 50 SO ' Design/Plan Review 570,000 $0 $0 50 $0 50 $70,000 Right-of-Way So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 5100,000 $o $0. $0 50 $100,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Contingency 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $70,000 S100,000 So $0 $0 So $170,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Law Enforcement Reserve(017) $70,000 $100,000 $0 5o $0 $0 $170,000 Total Costs: $70,000 $100,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 Impact on Operations: None ' C8 Project Number: JL Key: 1896 Object: Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center-Relocation Project Location: r-1 Analyzing various locations �­NE-RD VICA A';R I L-SIDE RD Will- I VVIL-SPWAVE-- V Ir D.S. A14YAWS, % g�- yr _TF WE 1210 Est.Design Start/End: I TH tl 8/2014-2/2015 .. - I. — ­_ �0 4 V Flr JR-r. C. ..CIFIQELF RAIL B S WNERV— VAtt ff Project Status: Design j, Ll�__ AVP X LI: FaUTHIII L M3 Department: < ill)ARROW-R-TFr Community Services/Parks < TH-ST I I, I 7-•- >I F6&Fr BIND Ll L Project Manager: ' FjQ �UYST 1' .'u Nettie Nielsen Description: This project will provide the analysis and conceptual design for relocation of the existing Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center. Justification: Need to relocate existing facility and programs due to loss of existing building use. Project Cost Bfirriate ,,: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $o $0 $o $0 $o Design/Plan Review $20,000 $30,000 $0 so $0 so $50,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Construction so $0 $o $0 $0 so $o Inspection&Administration $0 $0 so $0 $o $0 $o Contingency $0 $0 $0 so so $0 $0 Total Costs: $20,000 $30,000 so $0 $o $0 550,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Park Development(120) $20,000 $30,000 $0 50 so $o $50,000 Total Costs: $20,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $50,000 Impact on Operations: This project will ultimately require maintenance of a new facility,as well as new landscape and irrigation. C9 Project Number: JL Key: 1894 Object: Victoria Gardens Cultural Center-Courtyard Redesign Project Location: Y ti I I -��--/ —' I�! vE�. Ra M— / �, r Is;vrK C'" su cr 12505 Cultural Center Drive I m ���"r� a' a � I�:�-rI Ftsrwar a 1s , J , � o z n a u I I— [Top �TJIl7e-UZ / lJ VICTORIA II RDEN CULT URA—LCE NTER ti PAULIBIANE ABBF RY* Est.Design Start/End: N011 1K4 1,I4I_ --,T-,R LLI 12/2014-6/2015 1, ; i ¢• \•/ l SUV_ij_I32741N1,T:REL% Project Status: - W °z ¢ / jj� Q a Q I LL I i, i Design Il 2 PRS J CTOCATION: V-ERSAIL S�S:T� $ Q=yEKSAIL°LLS:57 f' %/� -HERY(i?S ' Department: Community Services/Parks 1 ^ V I GTOFtI.F-dAL NS-L-N Project Manager: o Nettie Nielsen m 7,1=zI ' Description: This project will be done in conjunction with Victoria Gardens to develop a design for the Cultural Center Courtyard. Justification: Provide enhancements to the existing courtyard to make the space more inviting for the public and rental opportunities. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $0 SO $0 50 $0 ' Design/Plan Review $0 $20,000 50 $o $0 50 $20,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 Construction $0 $0 $o $0 5o 5o $0 Inspection&Administration $0 So so $0 $0 So $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 50 ' Total Costs: So 520,000 $0 $0 $0 so $20,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) $0 $15,000 5o $0 $0 5o 515,000 ' CFD 2003-01 Cultural Center(615) $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Total Costs: $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 IImpact on Operations: This project will ultimately require additional maintenance as well as new landscape and irrigation. I C10 ' Project Number: 1L Key: 1895 Object: 1 Victoria Gardens Cultural Center-Loading Bay Project Location: –•'� — / �C CC SlI:VE12=q_F_St=Gr ' 12505 Cultural Center Drive r• -- >» JI 1 Z urUVr1uR NILri-Uf r _ VICTORIA IIGAR CULT RAL CE• TERM PAULI BIANE LI&BF RY• J / Est.Construction Start/End: N-7,RT}H:MA .TRLL!I w unknown I NJ i4 > J / I ' S(ZV_iT:r1,7AINS!LREEof, -++ Project Status: o ��`• / j + //� r CQ Q 4: Design J LL PROJ,E6'- LOCATION { V.E R SAI LL-E SSSMSM a=V LH SAILLL'1 .FIER V 1t•ST— �� 1Department: ' Community Services/Parks VIC-TORIA- ARB-ENS-L-N Project Manager: p Nettie Nielsen m Description: This project involves the design to cover the Service/Loading Bay at Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. Justification: Project will provide covered area for theater construction projects. i Project Cost Estimate($): ' Expend iture/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $25,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $25,000 So $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Capital Reserve)025) $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 ' Impact on Operations: Improvements will require maintenance of the structure and added light fixtures,as well as minimal electric cost for ... light useage. .... .� I C11 inure 1, Miscellaneous Miscellaneous projects are the capital undertakings that do not qualify for classification into the other project categories. These are often one-time projects that are prompted by factors such as: - State or Federal Mandates - Community Health and Safety Issues - Council Goals and Priorities - Regional Needs Assessments - Interagency Agreements - External Funding Arrangements These projects may or may not have maintenance obligations and they are typically funded from a variety of special funding sources; they are rarely funded via the General Fund. Project List& FY 2014-15 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 I.Arrow Rte Utility Underground - $1,000 Bear Gulch to W/O Archibald $ioo,000 2. Base Line Rd Utility Underground- $554,570 Carnelian St to Vineyard Ave $74,600 3. Bus Stop Pads at Various $93,240 Locations 4. Illuminated Street Name Sign $100,000 $18,640 Upgrade $748,810 $555,570 Underground Utilities ■Measure"I" ■Ped Grant Article 3 Gas Tax D i Project Number: 800-2010-12 I 1L Key: 1777 Object: Arrow Route Utility Underground -Bear Gulch to West of Archibald Avenue IProject Location: i r: Arrow Route from Bear Gulch to — I FOOTHILL BLVD west of Archibald Avenue J TIN SFRt INF.t N PROJECT LOCATIO 5 C � lI Est.Construction Start/End: 6/2016-1/2017 { — BEAR GULCH Project Status: ELEMENTARY i Design W l F I T I BEAR GULC _111 Department: j ............._........_._. Engineering _ — Project Manager: Walt Stickney Description: This project will underground a stretch of existing overhead utilities along Arrow Route from Bear Gulch to west of Archibald Avenue. Justification: The removal of the overhead utilities,by placing them underground,improves the aesthetic appearance of the area. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0. 50 50 $0 SO $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $1,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 516,000 ' Right-of-Way $0 $0 $o $0 So $0 $0 Construction $0 50 $626,690 $0 $0 $0 $626,690 I Inspection&Administration 5o $o 515,000 $0 So $0 $15,000 Contingency $0 $0 $62,670 $0 $o $0 $62,670 Total Costs: $0 51,000 $719,360 $0 $0 $0 $720,360 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Underground Utilities(129) $0 $1,000 5719,360 $0 50 50 $720,360 Total Costs: $0 <1 IInO c719,350 IImpact on Operations: None D1 Project Number: 800-2010-13 JL Key: 1776 Object: Base Line Road Utility Underground -Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue Project Location: \�;, /7 I _ �r����' •'�k:YRL�f/ vl L� J Base Line Road from Carnelian �,� L APHELIAN Street to Vineyard AvenueP Ix^�T~i o ELEMENTARY . � ^ ��A � 1•i u� I ALTA LOMA �, S s � � uL F11 GN 13 s JMiT{Ory '`w ' rwuu:ua:a I� Iry1� I��J I I I�� I "ULKL•U-• 1 i e•.r.�.-...--..-...-.- T-JZ-...-.......1..........��-w. - I'1_._ MA sE.uNr:eu Est.Construction Start/End: �: !I LIONS CENTER AST 6/2015-1/2016 •,3....s �'I LIONS PA F.K yJA IK�P� FD� DR IIS i 1 PROJECT LOCATION 'T` � - Project Status: \'�' I - ' cY/j I:A'K.i j Construction _„••�r l IZ P.. D ILL COMMUNITY PARK v'• % [1;u4_J� Department: EngineeringYeRayT 1J I Ti- J° Project Manager: / / / YALL E VISTA , Walt Stickney / I( J ELEMENTARY -` h l army / t rRJ..4Ic Description: This project will underground a stretch of existing overhead utilities along Base Line Road from Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue. Justification: The removal of the overhead utilities,by placing them underground,improves the aesthetic appearance of the area. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPOES s0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 50 ' Design/Plan Review So $10,000 $0 5o $0 $0 $10,000 Right-of-Way 5o so so So 50 so 5o Construction so 5481,420 $0 $0 $0 $0 5481,420 Inspection&Administration 5o 515,000 $0 so $0 SG $15,000 Contingency 5o $48,150 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,150 Total Costs: 50 5554,570 $0 5o 50 $0 $554,570 Project Funding: Funding[Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Underground Utilities'129 $G >0 - 50 50 5554,570 Total Costs: $0 $554,570 50 50 s0 $0 $554,570 Impact on Operations: None I D2 Project Number: 800-2014-07 JL Key: 1823 Object: Bus Stop Pads at Various Locations --FD T I i — Project Location: 77' Various locations throughout the City including stops on Haven 4 3. Avenue, Milliken Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, Baseline Road, 4th T U.- y Street and Carnelian Street ..' 'i:: ... ...... . PRWECT,WCATIONS j-- iY L L . . ..... ............ Est.Construction Start End: 01/2015-02/2015 fnL.I.1.IA-t + :q Project Status: .......... ..... ........ Design ........ ..................... .... ............ Department: .......... Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Description: Constructs 22 bus pads at various locations throughout the City. Justification: Provides ADA improvements to existing public transportation stops that are currently used by over 300 riders each day.The improvements may increase ADA ridership,resulting in less vehicle trips and reduced CO2 emissions. Project Cost Estimate Expend iture/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environment3l/NPDIS $o $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way $o so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $o $84,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $84,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Contingency $0 $9,240 $0 $0 $o $0 $9,240 Total Costs: $0 $93,240 so $0 $0 $o $93,240 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 $18,640 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,640 Ped Grant/Art3 Fund(214) $0 $74,600 so $0 $0 $0 $74,600 Total Costs: $0 ;93.240 $o $11 $0 so $93,240 Impact on Operations: None D3 Project Number: JL Key: 1693 Object: Illuminated Street Name Sign Upgrade Project Location: Lp Foothill Boulevard IMP;7 �_J 11:7 -F L g, II nz. T, j ILI L ----------------!Jr-,� L Biti I4 4`1_1 dY �010CAT kF20= R Est.Construction Start/End: July 2014—June 2015 r&_IA RK ................. .. ......... Project Status: .. Construction 77 MCEN. XPORTSE '.A �!Z,?;2�.... Department: IC �c ANIMAL c P M4E.np Public Works Services 4 • Project Manager: Ernest Ruiz .......... Description: Project consists of replacing damaged signs and/or individual sign panels and relocation of existing illuminated street name signs from a mast arm mounting to a wind resistant horizontal davit arm mounting. Justification: This project meets the City Council goal to promote energy efficiency by continuing to retrofit the illuminated street name signs with more energy efficient LED lighting. Project Cost Estimate Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016117 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 so $0 $o $o $o $0 Design/Plan Review $o $o $0 $0 $0 $o $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Construction $o $91,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $91,000 Inspection&Administration $o $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $o Contingency $o $9,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,000 Total Costs: $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $o $o $100,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax(170) $o $100,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $100,000 Total Costs: $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Impact on Operations: There will be minor disruptions to traffic when the illuminated street name signs are being replaced. Maintenance costs will go down because the new LED lights are more energy efficient and have a longer service life. D4 . . fIi Ftt Municipal UtiIIty The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) was formed by the City Council in 2001. RCMU served its first customers in 2003 and finished construction of the Victoria Arbors substa- tion in 2004. Currently, RCMU services over 500 customers in its service area. Annually, more than 73,000 megawatt-hours of electricity are distributed to our customers via 20 circuit miles of wire spread across the roughly 4-square miles of service territory. RCMU's historical peak demand is 17.5 megawatts, set in August 2011. RCMU capital projects are related to the maintenance, expansion and improvement of the RCMU distribution system. RCMU's distribution system was designed to minimize maintenance and operating costs and ensure maximum reliability of service. Project List& FY 2014-15 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 I. Haven Ave., 6th St.to 8th St.— $461,000 Electric Line Extension Total $461,000 $461,000 Municipal Utility(705) E Project Number: JL Key: 1883 Obert: Haven Avenue Electric Line Extension from 6th Street to 8th Street Project Location: a —� sTtl-s:r 0 (� Haven Avenue Electric Line L JGA aI I y I I 2'S.f.1:1 T Z ERSEY'OL"VD S Extension from 6th Street to 8th J� Z Street I 74TH S.T 4 PARK l O 11{:1M 0V,T--AVE i= = METRGUINK- �8th St—�.•.� INDIAN' CT y '� 1♦� Est.Construction Start/End: I I l F (~LL t>. ? May 2014? _ z 7TH=S-T�� F`rj E PIRE LAKES GOLF CC z fProject Status: w Design w w n z Department: 6tH-5t--s Engineering J J = PROJECT LO �JATION ' Project Manager: u. Fred Lyn q EMIP11E LAKES GOLF COUP rl:t-sr_ Description: Distribution Line Extension south of 8th Street to service vacant parcels with RCMU electricity. ' Justification: Line extension is needed to extend power service to two vacant parcels south of 8th Street(South of 7th/North of Cola Cola Plant and corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue). Once lines are extended,RCMU will also have accessibility to run lines South to the corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street to service the large vacant parcel (Phase 2). The City paid SCE exit fees for the right to service any load associated with a newly constructed facility or undeveloped parcel that has never been interconnected with Edison; ' this falls under that category. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Construction $0 $461,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $461,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $o $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $10,000 $461,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $471,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Municipal Utility{Fund 705) $10,000 $461,000 $0 ;G S0 SO $471,G00 Total Costs: $10,000 $461,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $471,000 Impact on Operations: The increased electricity load will provide additional revenue to RCMU. E1 345:E'EhL SPRAY l• OPEN P:AYGROI:N:) . :. k ` 54R9ECd'JE Parks Any capital project that is located in, on, or adjacent to a park or community center facility is classified as a Park Project. These include the construction of new park facilities, as well as the expansion or rehabilitation of existing park facilities. Improvements include playing fields, play ground equipment, park landscaping, other miscellaneous recreational amenities, restroom facilities and parking lot improvements. Many of these projects require ongoing maintenance, and all field rehabilitation projects and renovations are performed on an annual or bi-annual basis due to extensive wear from local league play. The majority of Park Projects are funded via the Park Development Fund (120), which is collected via residential development fees (i.e. new single family, town home, condo and senior housing). Some projects qualify for grants and Special District funds. Project List& FY 2014-15 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 I. Central Park-Outdoor Improvements $50,000 2. Central Park Pavillion-Phase II $82,250 Improvements $212,420 3. Etiwanda Creek Park Sidewalk $250,000 Improvements 4. Park Playground ADA and CPSC Im- $150,000 $382,250 provements 5. Park Playground Rubberized Surface $16,000 Maintenance 6. Park Playground Seat Wall $8,720 7. Southwest Cucamonga Park-New $283,500 $283,soo Park 8. Various Parks within LMD 4-Ballfield $37,700 Fence and Curb Replacement ®Park Development Total $878,170 ■Prop 84 State Grant ■LMD 4R F tProject Number: JL Key: 1871 ' Object: Central Park-Outdoor Improvements Project Location: la`� f1 Fr -�LAWIKE•5��:1 ' I /) w 11200 Base Line Road J ~'CSL'•.+.es KD fkbgh r)/ qqv ONES Q n un4 Z —Ei � PROs:JECT><LOCATIOI�1 ,�p �-= AIKr.1UN.T_LY-------------------- AY— J ~ 2 �U N'Ur1AT_Cr � t t IQ Est.Design Start/End: c PAC FIC ELECTRIC TRAIL 8/2014-12/2014 zt:r;rvrLw_DrrJ? Project Status: r� z - Design I RANCHO CUCAMONGA CENTRA PARK ' z z Department: Z .� Community Services/Parks BASE LINE RD Project Manager: Nettie Nielsen �� l�CEwiSJiRS�i� (r3eritivrtylpk ' Description: This design only project will provide the next phase of development for Central Park,north of the interior road,between the PE Trail and the Community Center. Included will be an area for outdoor fitness equipment for trail and resident's use at the park site,as well as potential parking and restroom facilities for both park and trail users. Justification: Responds to resident's requests for further improvements to Central Park. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $50,000 $o $o SO 50 $50,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 Construction 5o $o 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5o Contingency $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $o Total Costs: $0 $50,000 $0 SO $0 5o $50,000 IProject Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 201415 2015/16 2016/17 201718 201819 TOTAL I Park Development'110, $0 $50,000 50 $0 50 $0 $50,000 Total Costs: 50 550,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 I Impact on Operations: Currently design only. This project,when constructed will require maintenance such as cleaning and replacing any damaged portions of the equipment,as wll as landscape irrigation and maintenance as needed. F1 Project Number: A Key: 1803 ' Object: Central Park- Pavillion Phase II Improvements ' Project Location: 11200 Base Line Road secs.?r.+4s Kb Ct fk'�N��� � ati� a E,-A— �aa z 1�N4a. y PROJECT\ LOCATION Alt<rAUN7 WAY �UFtUR-AMA_c:r !i- J I"—' �•..-8AY.LnR-S.T Est.Design Start/End: .W 8/2014-12/2014 —c-----_PAC=IC ELECTRIC TRAIL c I z v� Project Status: t / Design/Construction RANCHO CUCAMONGA CENTRA PARK � � z Department: i Community Services/Parks ` BASE LINE RD ' Project Manager: (� Nettie Nielsen )`� IL'EN2S�iicfi'�R� �tiesiw,ZK_U f Description: This project will provide electrical service,a drinking fountain and site furnishings for the newly constructed Pavilion structure. Justification: Provides amenties that will support rental use of the pavillion. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL ' Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review 5o $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $100,000 567,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 5167,500 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 50 $0 $0 50 $0 Contingency $0 $6,750 $0 $0 $o $0 $6,750 Total Costs: $100,000 $82,250 $o $0 $0 $o $182,250 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Park Development(120) $100,000 $82,250 $0 5o 50 $0 $182,250 Total Costs: $100,000 $82,250 $0 $0 50 $0 $182,250 Impact on Operations: This project will require maintenance of the amenities proposed,as well as additional expenditure for electrical and water. Estimated annual costs are:Electric$200,water$510,materials$2,550contract services$650. I F2 ' Project Number: JL Key: 1861 Object: Etiwanda Creek Park-Sidewalk Improvements ' Project Location: "I •a Fn.:S:'...- 5939 East Avenue fir. �_ RA! ETIWANDA COLONY !.. ELEMENTARY •.ETIW +iD AA.GREEK 1 00116 NI.TY PARK;.'. 1 N A EHRLY Z f1,1.1 N TERM ED IATEALE IOR NIOM ANY'AN'SiI Est.Construction Start/End: I WINTERNINI UI DR- 5/15/2015-7/1/15 a� —� \ y LL PROJECT LOCJATIO.N ` WILL LIAPLL C 1 Project Status: Construction m •,cf f �nss.la S' GV pQU_nN Department: n r Community Services/Parks- Engineering ,v.=nRar „n.Rc �� ICKn aw'k Project Manager: .xxc Romeo David ^v , r-� ��x;Tei-eR-r.T—,y ReFRne ' Description: This project involves the modification of existing sidewalks and provisions for new sidewalks to accommodate ADA. Justification: Currently,there is no sidewalk access to the north side of the soccer/football fields. In addition,the sidewalks and access points in the dog park are not accessible from the parking lot. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $25,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $240,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $240,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Contingency $0 $0 $o $0 $o $0 $0 Total Costs: $25,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Park Development(120) $25,000 $250,000 $0 $o $o $0 $275,000 ' Total Costs: $25,000 $250,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $275,000 Impact on Operations: Completion of this project will allow access to the soccer/football fields,as well as the dog park area to comply with ADA. F3 Project Number: 1L Key: 1860 Object: Park Playground ADA and CPSC Improvements ILL �% ........,.gyp... , .f RA, Project Location: —� r � cER' p 1� a O I/��y.P� �\ COYOTE CANY J PAR �y' 7730 Spruce Avenue - ;T F,y/ `;i� 1` `t1�j ;u�Q Y rywNlN �'_i! I td"�� �•� RU TN-USSER av �t� ✓�� MIDDLE :IEG57� tic •?+ //7 � !_�� l '�>'� ��' Est.Construction Start/End: SPRUC AVE 'a wEsr' crxeeNwar�K 9/2014-11/2014 ILLIKEN i \•J�' �'., CO. ZTE­.1Y N `, I •'<:� \Project Status:Construction I 4 Department: PROJECT LOCJg►TIOIH RALPH M�� r Community Services/Parks Project Manager: ' Nettie Nielsen —J FOOTFII��BLV ' Description: This project includes the installation of new playground equipment which complies with current Consumer Products Safety Commission(CPSC)and Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)Standards at Spruce Avenue Park. Justification: This project will improve accessibility and safety. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 201415 2015/16 201617 201718 201819 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 $0 SO $0 50 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 Construction $0 5150,000 So $o $0 $0 $150,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $150,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $150,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL LIVID 411(Fund 134) $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Total Costs: $0 $150,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $150,000 Impact on Operations: This project reduces the amount of maintenance performed on playground equipment. F4 Project Number: 1 L Key: Object: 5607 Park Playground Rubberized Surface Maintenance Project Location: West Greenway Park(LIVID4R) '�z— y�nss FruNKCl�q� =Z_—S. > LLJ 14t l — 477 Z a N tl:NU NCt:D t I "cselr t Siff t r �2d COYOE CANYON PARK y� Est.Construction Start/End: q;'apTrT PROJECT LOCATI �,t/4vr�1 July 2014-June 2015 tip t �.NJa�w \\/NSR �c RUTH MUSSER j i f-c�-'�•.``..��H�'`�1 �. '!�p� / MIDDLE f �a-�J ",P� Project Status: 1 Requested for FY 2014-2015 F Ni'Ri VIEIfi-ift y ` `. nl �QMIATA.DR SPRUC AVENV �PtiRK j Department: �------- ST Cdr ENWAY'PA K Public Works Services � / -"�- J� dILLIKEN PA F % {?s Project Manager: QC4G CO OTECA N Dean Rodia S ELEMENTARY �`� Description: Maintenance of the existing playground surface at West Greenway Park(LIVID 4R)with a new rubberized surface. ' Justification: The rubberized playground surface meets the latest ADA requirements. Project Cost Estimate(S): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 so 50 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way So $0 $0 so $0 $0 So Construction $0 $15,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $1,000 50 so $0 $0 $1,000 Total Costs: $0 $16,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $16,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL LIVID 411 Terra Vista(134) $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Total Costs: $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Impact on Operations: The playground at West Greenway Park will have to be closed to the general public while the new rubberized surface is being installed. F5 Project Number: JL Key: ' Object: 5607 Park Playground Seat Wall Project location: I ' �'1•ar /r`� a=-? �f' i I I�.0 NFiFLb DFJ`�� u Ralph Lewis Park(LIVID 4R) 's SIS%P �� J ?�� I� :HUBBY OR^J �:iUN:}7C.N2'L:4q`.R ` 4L$li1LY0� �Jr �/srneri['t'�nx �tlw.. �AJS Av12 CANYON PARK JIKoq / �^ J F 49M4r YI Est.Construction Start/End: ` ` r! RU TM MUSSER July 2014-June 2015 J \muoLe ��. Y1P PROJECT'L-OCATWWI' Project Status: SPRUC•AVEN{UE,PARK �� Requested for FY 2014-2015 =- T�N a~K MILLIKEN PAR i Department: a i, �' COYOTE CA ON ELEMENTARY Public Works Services ' Project Manager: LPH M.LUW.M P J Dean Rodia 1 Description: Construct seat walls adjacent to the Ralph Lewis Park playground. Justification: The seat walls would prevent soil and park debris from entering the playground area and prevent playground sand and debris from entering the park. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Construction $0 $8,000 50 $0 $0 $0 S8,000 Inspection&Administration $o So So $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $o $720 $0 50 $0 50 $720 ' Total Costs: $0 $8,720 $0 $0 SO $0 $8,720 Project Funding: IFunding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL LIVID 411 Terra Vista(134) $0 $8,720 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,720 Total Costs: $0 $8,720 50 $0 $0 SO $8,720 Impact on Operations: Access to the Ralph Lewis Park playground will be restricted while the seat wall is being constructed. Long term 1 maintenance costs will be reduced by separating turf and playground areas. I F6 Project Number: JL Key: 1754 Object: Southwest Cucamonga Park Project Location: 'N�� I .- East side of Madrone Avenue d between Arrow Route and 9th Street . 0 Est.Construction Start/End: 0 z 1/2015-1/2017 W > r Project Status: PROJECT LOCATION Design W J Z Department: Community Services CITY Project Manager: YARD Nettie Nielsen CITY LIMITS 9 T-1 Description: The City was awarded$3,941,136,as a Prop 84 State Grant,to design and construct a 3.4 acre neighborhood park for the local residents in Southwest Cucamonga. Project must be completed by June 2017. Justification: No other neighborhood park within a 1/2 mile radius. Park will serve low income neighborhood. Project Cost Estimate Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $2,282 $0 $0 $0 so $o $2,282 Design/Grant Prep $67,772 $283,500 $0 $0 $o $0 $351,272 Site Remediation $40,000 so so $0 $0 $0 $40,000 Construction $0 $0 $3,469,907 $o $0 $0 $3,469,907 Inspection&Administration $o so 5166.180 so so so $165,180 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $110,054 5283,500 $3,635,087 $0 so so $4,028,641 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Park Development(120) $47,500 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $47,500 Prop 84 State Grant(235) $22,554 $283,500 $3,635,087 $0 $0 $0 53,941,141 RDASA $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $40,000 Iota.Costs: $110,054 $283,500 �A'6-4 5,n $4;028,641 Impact on Operations: This project will provide a new neighborhood park and will require park maintenance such as mowing and cleaning of bathrooms,as well as maintenance of all other amenities and landscape irrigation. It will increase operational and maintenance costs by approximately $60,000 per year in General Fund, or more depending on addition of water feature. F7 IProject Number: JL Key: Object: 5607 Various Parks within LMD 4- Ballfield Fence and Curb Replacement Project location: BASE LINE RO -- W tSI UNERIO GE DR Y LIVID 4-Coyote Park,Milliken Park :EF ! t�> i ar rewt:,c•oR( r / a'• and Mountain View Park d -^Mt'i1RFiElLY.UR��� �f I� �,.MGv.VMENI-O PROJECT LOCATION %- r--,�-��-- "Cr' PRINKIIN,OIlR J� KNIPY K'WtST�y—�-c• ��^ i�..�l .� �`�'`'v•.`�, � U<:JAY<� •SERn � : .: �1 `SII tf_ .. per. � Est.Construction Start/End: COYO LANYU PARK .� '�., / ,�� 1.� TERRAVIS July 2014—June 2015 `T >'_�i'l /,r '. ELEMENTARY MOUN tNv ' Project Status: Requested for FY 2014-2015 itXA J C`u+l"4V,VIF , I,GrA1AT'A R Department: _\PARIK 1)(yJl jy 9 Public Works Services �'l\� Fv.iKS�RWE T UREENWAY PA KL J � ILLIKEN PAR Project Manager: F����-. COLE ECANYYON y , M4f/( 1 Dean Rodia / /f •4< k� Description: Removal and replacement of existing chain link fencing along ballfields. Construction of a 1' high concrete curb under the replacement chain link fencing. Justification: The existing chain link fencing has been damaged from years of use. The construction of a 1'high concrete curb under the fencing will separate the brick dust of the ballfield from the adjacent grass and protect the fence from future damage. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Cateeory Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way So $0 $0 $o so $0 $0 ■ Construction $0 $34,000 s0 $0 $0 $0 $34,000 ® inspection&Administration $0 $300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300 Contingency $0 $3,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,400 Total Costs: $0 $37,700 $0 $0 50 $0 $37,700 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 201415 201516 201617 2017/18 201819 TOTAL LIVID 411 Terra Vista(134) $0 $37,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,700 Total Costs: $0 $37,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,700 Impact on Operations: The ballfields will not be usable for 2 weeks while the chain link fence is being replaced and curb installed. Once completed,the new improvements will lower maintenance to the ballfields. F8 p 0_am ���:�' . _MFTROIINK a� � "�'—!� ', i Ifti!illlrrii(itiil�tiit�l 1 ,i �- Rai IroadCrossin s ` g Railroad Crossings are extremely expensive and infrequent projects, requiring large funding commitments, lengthy construction schedules and inevitably causing some inconvenience to the local community during the construction period. They are, however, also one of the best ways to ensure the safety of drivers, pedestrians and rail users by providing two separate crossings, thereby minimizing the possibility of train versus automobile, or train versus pedestrian accidents. Railroad Crossings are identified in the City's General Plan document, and they are also frequently illustrated in regional planning documents held by the County of San Bernardino, SANBAG and Caltrans. Project List& FY 2014-15 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 1. Arrow Route @ RailroadSpur $500 $500 - New Concrete Panels $650,000 2. Hellman Avenue @ Metrolink- $1,300,000 Tracks Widen Crossing Total $1,300,500 $650,000 ■Citywide Infrastructure ■Transportation Gas Tax RT7360 G ' Project Number: 800-2013-12 1L Key: 1819 Object: Arrow Route at Railroad Spur- New Concrete Panels Project Location: — I� Arrow Route at Railroad Spur west > FOOTH.I.L'L=[iCVl7 IJi: of Milliken Avenue Q I w J I •RC: POLICE STATION y r11L:r-ENIN Est.Construction Start/End: 7ER:DR PROJECT LOCATION J ' i,� JJ 5/2016-7/2016 �/ /1 RAI Qa Project Status: O U-1 R• ' Design Q ARF30. R.TE—` > Department: ' Engineering C afTACt�dA-GR �`— R ac Project Manager: ac (} Romeo David Il_�I .�,I�Q`Ir-R,-�-,r, FIRF—STATION--r Description: Replace existing uneven rubber panels to concrete panels. Justification: The existing rubber panels are uneven and damaged due to heavy traffic used. Replacing with concrete panels will give a smoother ride and safer for vehicles. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 50 50 $0 $0 50 Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 So s0 $0 510,500 Right-of-Way 50 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $60,000 50 $0 50 $60,000 Inspection&Administration s0 50 $9,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,000 Contingency $0 50 $6,000 $0 $0 $O $6,000 Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $75,000 50 $0 50 $85,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360 Fund(174) $10,000 $500 $75,000 $0 50 $0 $85,500 ITotal Costs: $10,000 $500 $75,000 $0 50 50 585,500 Impact on Operations: Uneven rubber created damage along the edges of the existing asphalt pavement. This project will reduce maintenance for asphalt replacement. G1 Project Number: 800-2013-17 1L Key: 1847 Object: Hellman Avenue at Metrolink Tracks-Widen Crossing Project Location: Hellman Avenue at Metrolink �= I Tracks(8th Street) ull � a 2 -I C W � 7r:1_S"_l = Z. J J ]. �� G Est.Construction Start/End: ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Project Number: 800-2013-03 1L Key: 1853 Object: 4th Street from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - North Side Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: 4th Street From Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 8/2015 —10/2015 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David �idA'1 N:Sr OLD TOW _P_ARK Fi W M17 E3 0 L:t= 4V F � i ND:l�,1'NA CT i N' 4 LCac :n=s ri f W �Q ui Q = w 7-TH'S. �W=�j� CISS:ST' tON:S J< PROJECT LOCATION % :OAK"D r k m 0 � a � m u: )NS OR HAWTHoRNF..TITj a �u s.rr+:s:r—ERADENIArt K-s.—� � 'r s Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments, and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 So 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $20,000 5500 $0 $0 50 $0 $20,500 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 5o 5o $0 50 Construction $0 5o $272,000 $0 5o $0 5272,000 Inspection & Administration SO W $6,000 $o 5o so $6,000 Contingency $0 $0 $27,000 $0 $0 50 $27,000 Total Costs: $20,000 $500 $305,000 $0 $0 50 $325,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund (176) $10,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Measure I Fund (177) $10,000 $500 $305,000 50 $0 $0 $315,500 Total Costs: $20,000 $500 $305,000 $C $0 $C $325,500 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H1 1 1 1 Project Number: 800-2013-04 1L Key: 1849 Object: 6th Street from Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: 6th Street From Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 8/2014 —10/2014 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David S:I:Ft.�T NINDIANA C1 AC:AI:IA.S.I_ PHI LADEL HIAICT :J < 7_TJ3:5_T Z LU J w 'S PROJECT LOC TION (,w I SHARQNZ } •J m Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments, and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/CategM Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 SO $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $15,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $240,000 $0 $0 $0 So $240,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $21,000 $0 $0 SO $0 $21,000 Contingency $0 $24,000 $0 So $0 SO S24,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $315,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 201415 201516 201617 201718 201819 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) $15,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $315,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $315,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing attend to other needed areas. up maintenance crews to H2 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 Project Number: 800-2014-04 JL Key: 1876 Object: 7th Street from Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: 7th Street from Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 08 /2015 -10/2015 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David U.- 8 -THS -T 'a• N z . J J —ACAc1i , PROJECT LOCATION �• U. Q� -2 �.:. 7TH ST. . Y i� fl��ED.ELlifEI;S.5=5T—� LU %w 1 :a 4 y '7 j ��A�fAE1-1 N–S`T— Z = YJ w_QEEFSEiRS�.�K�= N d 7 v d r% �^f�EEFSB.RC'?31(3T p_N'FACLC ST C � � � 71�EADU4Y ST Y � 6TH=SJ Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic $250,000 signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments, and pavement striping. $0 $0 Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($): Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 50 50 50 50 $0 Design/Plan Review $o S20,000 $0 $0 So $0 $20,000 Right -of -Way 5o So 5o 5o $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $218,000 $0 50 $0 $218,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $10,000 $0 5o $o $10,000 Contingency $0 $0 $22,000 $0 $0 $0 $22,000 Total Costs: $0 $20,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $270,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) $0 $20,000 $250,000 $0 $0 50 $270,000 Total Costs: 50 $20,000 5250,000 $0 $0 $0 5270,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H3 Project Number: 800-2013-05 1L Key: 1851 Object: 8th Street from Baker Avenue to Hellman Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: 8th Street From Baker Avenue to Hellman Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 8/2014 —10/2014 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David I I BEAR •uULCH I IP.1 KNULLWUC•C CSR n I ELEMENTARY 4PPLEVIOOD `Di l J Q I Kt BEA GULCH -ARF— 4 i-c_vt= u,.q I —1 `J 0:1t�w� RTE i77 [7 W� - i _ :LigA S.L.-W 2 y� 2 �I Qi 4MIGCLS IENTARV I � =6un_rt.sl , PROJECT LOCATION � • IF.i Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments, and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $o $0 50 $0 50 Design/Plan Review $15,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $35,000 Right -of -Way $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 So Construction $0 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 5o $220,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $38,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $38,000 Contingency $0 $22,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $300,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $315,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) $15,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $315,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $300,000 $0 So 50 $0 $315,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H4 Project Number: 800-2012-20 JL Key: 1808 Object: 9th Street West of Vineyard Avenue - Sidewalk Improvements Project Location: 9th Street north side from 100 feet west of Vineyard Avenue to 800 feet west of Vineyard Avenue. Est. Construction Start/End: 11/2014-12/2014 Project Status: Design and Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings � A�f2R6i+G"iFtE LL' a v z W / (� F- IJ H z �i LU X.IMIS—AND 2 LOS AMIGOS ¢ ELEMENTARY ACWAUD CT. AR OW RTE... —9 TH-S T e s 60y.'�EN ST {gl `E AFFFF S_ N i ZROJECT LOCA ON 1AIN�5 8TH ST. Description: Project to construct 700 feet of sidewalk on the north side of 9th Street. Justification: To provide students a safe and direct route walking to school. The poject goal is to reduce the need for bus services and its benefits are measured by student surveys taken before and after the project. The City was awarded a federal Safe Routes To School grant to fund 75% of the construction costs. $0 so s0 $123,650 Project Funding: Project Cost Estimate ($): Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $7,850 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $7,850 Right -of -Way $0 $0 so $0 $0 $0 5o Construction $0 $103,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $103,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $2,300 $0 $0 50 $0 $2,300 Contingency so $10,500 $0 $0 50 $0 $10,500 Total Costs: $7,850 $115,800 $0 $0 so s0 $123,650 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Citywide Infrastructure (198) $7,850 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,850 Safe Route School Fund (234) so $90,800 $0 $0 s0 s0 $90,800 Total Costs: $7,850 5115,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $123,650 Impact on Operations: Reduction in parkway maintenance costs. H5 Project Number: 800-2013-08 JL Key: 1836 Object: 19th Street from West City limit to Haven Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: 19th Street from west city limit to Haven Avenue Est. Construction Sta 8/2014-10/2014 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David = I �. �•�"" p..;il it i � !�.,.PiJ„"•Pn:;ir a.. i ;wT,T; j ��,�;'' I \�<b W . nLP�' aF I° ,* .I fJIP11"_'PROJECT:LOCATION, !' a � , � N jjjL � fYNIL. � NI[b nERYL PARxeA—°EPTL PAR '� ........"....'...........i....—..��� h:wJ . ri ........:: ...... .:�i..... ................ ............... f� s I R yibo:r.ms : . N1rL¢V.vlPNC9 � F�� 1 ��J_ y,L � �'t_r,_'L��J• '"> ��T���TTTTT������r���rr----����� I , � I�.'LmP.m,.� L . o ° Q�1 J.". $ TIPnr�:I. v�� BASE LINE RD - L�°` I'y� "°_L ill � Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments, and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($�: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/1 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Design/Plan Review $49,500 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,500 Right -of -Way $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $1,225,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $1,225,000 Inspection & Administra 50 $27,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,500 Contingency $0 $122,500 $D so SO $0 $122,500 Total Costs: $49,500 $1,375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,424,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 201415 201516 201617 201718 201819 TOTAL Measure I Fund (176) $0 $474,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $474,000 Measure I Fund (177) $49,500 $901,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,500 Total Costs: $49,500 $1,375,000 $o $0 $0 So $1,424,500 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up mantenance crews to attend to other needed areas. Project Number: 800-2013-09 JL Key: 1852 Object: Archibald Avenue from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Archibald Avenue from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard Est. Construction Start/End: 8/2015 — 10/2015 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David J I v ��1TARYLI I k.f—�� ELErA LLLL _B 19 A11,1IJLY'SPORTSCENTERisiAFalA�sr _ FOOI71FL VD-1100 < [ 0 �CITY HA [BEAF! G�� H•PLAC�S�- EL kISE-5T�Er4W RIEkt -EARLY _ I _�EIAR GULCH-PARW SPEC IA -L ED t a y AF2ROW-�R�T wL:3 I �_ 5 LI sFra C g CV �-�°` A = EI(EIJlENAf x lYl I a' � 9TH S -F TH-S7 J ELE ENTi4RY I �WH-,-CUBrAON�aAI •LU OLD EMPIRE LAKEST;' PROJECT LOCATIOy�- �, ) > c.0 DEI OA•K_ �PA•R 16�H-5T—Z— i �_—i z > Mo aoolt nR — EMPIRE LAKII G ' dTH•ST L Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments, and pavement striping. $1,201,000 $0 Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Funding: Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $50,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 50 $50,500 Right -of -Way so $0 $0 so $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $1,070,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,070,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $24,000 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 Contingency s0 5o $107,000 5o $0 $0 5107,000 Total Costs: $50,000 $500 $1,201,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,251,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund (176) $50,000 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $50,000 Measure I Fund (177) $0 $500 $1,201,000 $0 .50 $0 $1,201,500 Total Costs: $50,000. $500., $1,201,000 $0 $0 51.25 .500 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H7 Project Number: 800-2013-10 1L Key: 1727 Object: Archibald Avenue from Hillside Road to North City Limit - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: II Archibald Avenue from Hillside__- Road to North City Limit! C I`I i E 1111 %- �LMCiN0.5.T'i �MVhU.4- PROJECT LOCATION 4 re V Est. Construction Start/End: JL'LN rARM'ROJ I ff A' pRj�^1J V Z� 8/2015 — 10/2015 CAFRARII:.I_`,J V 1 ' IIL,441iRGk:.S'."l 7 Project Status: / J-----� l ' y i Sr1ERW000 DR i' s K '✓ ! `! 31RCAWAY:5 J Ig- Design ;P 4 STANFORIIPR fs' is :�ur��lar ca— :moi x r)A `tiEP. Ok YJRbRQVIt: (}R ^' Il (1 vALZLY_vIcYY>7 T (� Department: �� ri s I; Engineering �Y1N.1;'M^WE:LN3 ie Q ��� z_F.iIL LTu IQE'ND� I i e I�=R ANCHOJ Project Manager: a = w Ilf RI.IAf:I: 1 r f Romeo David I I _A7A'CS4iC!T ig ��1 I'rI ) 1,, _J Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments, and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In ' addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $17,220 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,720 Right -of -Way $0 $o $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $490,000 $0 50 $0 $490,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $11,000 $0 $0 $0 $11,000 Contingency $o $0 $49,000 $0 $0 $0 $49,000 Total Costs: $17,220 $500 $550,000 $0 $0 $0 $567,720 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund (177) $17,220 $500 $550,000 $0 $0 $0 $567,720 Total Costs: $17,220 $500 $550,000 $0 $o $0 $567,720 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to Iattend I to other needed areas. IH8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 Project Number: 800-2014-10 1L Key: 1869 Object: Baker Street from Main Street to Foothill Boulevard - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Baker Street from Main Street to 1 Foothill Boulevard pN•AFRru gRt71N0 RD �¢p\� C 1' I G'��P I_ `G GAO j BEAR G U L, H i� i �1Q•�P ` ELEMENTARY Est. Construction Start/End: w s 08 ¢ } BEAR GUL _ i PAR LU n �J_ U C71-a .n w ARRQW-RTE Z Project Status: L o J 3 `-1 a ROJECT LOCATION Design > w SALIAIA. ' i -Z g < X a >.' Lid—SA MI S r EMENT tY^`~` LEo Department: q LU 9 -UH S- 15 T Engineering >d g i30W�.N • 0<LU Z H FFEE-SI' U C _ J Project Manager: J >% -pgAIN-ST �LL Romeo David tHLH■S T Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments, and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Design/Plan Review $13,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $260,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $260,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $44,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,000 Contingency $0 $26,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,000 Total Costs: $13,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $363,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) $13,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,000 Measure I Fund (177) $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 Total C45t5:$13,000 $350,00 $C $0 $0 $0 $363;000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H9 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I Project Location: Base Line Road at the 1-15 Freeway Est. Construction Start/End: 07/2014 - 07/2016 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Jason Welday Project Number: 1L Key: 1361 Object: Base Line Road at 1-15 Interchange C >Q wnv vn n,tLU-UR '�yV1IYUTJ+� p y PACIFIC (E'LECIRIC TRAIL N:ST'�I p rI Z1 SUIV IE-', GRAPELAND w u' ELEMENTARY j�4 •C � Q_LIf.7A.DRz K -PODR ECT LOCATIA I ILI•rh Ian BASE LINE RD— /. i `ItILtY_CT ,w i.r. cT Description: Construction of a modification to the on and off ramps for the 1-15 Freeway at Base Line Road. Justification: Due to the current and projected congestion of the streets around the interchange, it is necessary to improve access to and from the 1-15 freeway at Base Line Road. Up to 50 percent of the project costs are eligible for reimbursement through Federal funds. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Categga Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $1,065,033 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,065,033 Design/Plan Review $4,576,400 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $4,576,400 Right -of -Way $7,396,387 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $7,396,387 Construction $35,000,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,200,000 Soft Costs $7,000,000 $0 So $0 $0 $o $7,000,000 Contingency $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $55,037,820 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $55,237,820 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 201415 2015/16 201617 201718 201819 TOTAL General Fund (001) $18,996 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,996 Transportation (124) $4,148,571 $200,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $4,348,571 City Infrastructure (198) $1,350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,350,000 RDASC 2001 TAB (650) $3,771 $0 $0 $p $0 $0 $3,771 RDASC 2004 TAB (660) $42,516,482 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,516,482 IMD (Federal) $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 SAFETEA-LU (Federal) $4,000,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Grand Total Costs: $55,037,820 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 SO $55,237,820 Impact on Operations: City is expected to take over maintenance of the landscaping within the interchange. Area of landscaping has not yet been determined. H10 Project Number: 800-2013-13 JL Key: 1722 Object: Carnelian Street from Lemon Avenue to Wilson Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Carnelian Street from Lemon Avenue to Wilson Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 8/2015 —10/2015 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Description: Justification: . ✓ h 1 WILSUNAV- -_ PROJECT LOCATION—, —T -MEN _ :11N�'.I.NVEP:ST` . III If ',� .. `lyP .• �_MANI12'H:NIN.E �. rQ��2L`-- L �.` MP!Id�FIN6VF= //" ,•' (( yj ,� `�' 11�x ' �Ic 1I�€I.TGNE �T tILLlC .^ 4LTA LOMA JSJ✓�—+�J3 iajJ��Jw JV NIOR MtGN I r —17;. ' •J c�- ri li This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments, and pavement striping. This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 So $0 $0 5o SO $0 Design/Plan Review 510,500 $500 SO $0 $0 SO $11,000 Right -of -Way s0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 SO Construction $0 So $445,500 $0 $0 5o $445,500 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Contingency $0 $0 $44,500 $0 So $0 $44,500 Total Costs: $10,500 $500 5500,000 So $0 $0 $511,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund (177) $10,500 $500 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $511,000 Total Costs: $10,500 $500 5500,000 $0 $0 $0 $511,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H11 1 1 1 I I I I I I Project Number: 800-2010-15 JL Key: 1076 Object: Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route - Widening Project Location: Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route Est. Construction Start/End To be determined Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Description: ;, O' '1 NI GA ADS TSP OR TS CCM PLEX •� I'II .^!CBENNY_UIiJ / ;'/ =&ADOPTION CENTER �(_ C -jt'OVFRi—ARROW-RIE �� 2017/18 p��% /► /e pA a PROJECT LOCATION z' Environmental/NPDES $0 /Y g IE: p ¢ '•�� A, / ? WIiITTRKI,7-A ATSF RAILROAD $0 Design/Plan Review $157,600 $100,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $257,600 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 S $0 i� � a a ,✓�l�—6iH�5T I $0 1� `.:AMb1'ARINO:s.Tl IJ I $0 I $0 $0 Prepare a conceptual grade separation plan and cost estimate for the future widening of Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route. Justification: This project will provide a conceptional grade separation plan which is needed for the General Plan and informational purposes. It will also provide a cost esitmate for advance planning and funding. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $157,600 $100,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $257,600 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $157,600 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $257,600 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 201415 201516 201617 201718 201819 TOTAL Transportation Fund (124) $132,600 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 s0 $207,600 Infrastructure Fund (198) $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Total Cost,: $157,600 $100,000 $0 c 50 $0 $257,600 Impact on Operations: None H12 Project Number: 800-2012-07 1L Key: 1826 Objects: Foothill Boulevard across SCE Corridor West of Day Creek Channel - Sidewalk Improvements Project Location: VICTgRIA GARDENS CU II / Foothill Boulevard across SCE iS r' � `NUII.TL?TA INSf REST %'� % I �'ASF.'F� Yi_d Corridor west of Day Creek 4 %%I k9 _ ) Channel 5r��'I -TL IIAIN SF.F 7'—�-�;TF�.•. EF.. s Neccu ��� WI 1 V (I ✓.�.F BAILEESa— S V (r—�.O6 CF..T_5., oI(II �Ijlll opC Est. Construction Start/End: PIf���iGc;T 1.DIC"A�'®� I VICTO�AFiULN I.N 1/2015 — 2/2015 l nEH..v.ILiyli� '; Project Status: FOOTHILL BLVD —...._..._— r——...... ,_.._—.._ Q Design Department: j { Engineering Project Manager: (RANCMOGIJICAMONGA DUETS R15 COMPLE7( EPICENTEI'i5POriTS'C'OrJIPLE Romeo David / j ( I 1 Description: This project will install 600 feet of sidewalk to close the gap between two existing sections of sidewalk. Justification: This project was requested by handicap residents using this route everyday. The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation as well as bring the area into ADA compliance. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 510,000 $0 5o 50 $0 510,000 Right -of -Way $0 5o $0 $o $0 So $0 Construction So $110,000 $0 $0 5o $0 $110,000 Inspection & Administration S0 514,000 50 $0 50 50 $14,000 Contingency $0 $11,000 5o 5o $0 $0 Sum Total Costs: $0 $145,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $145,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL City Wide Infastructure Fund (198) $0 $145,000 $0 So $0 $0 $145,000 Total Costs: $0 $145,000 5o $0 50 $0 5145,000 Impact an Operations: This project will reduce maintenance and weed abatement costs from General Fund and LMD 3B. H13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I Project Number: 800-2013-14 1L Key: 1855 Object: Foothill Boulevard from Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Foothill Boulevard from Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 08 /2015 -10/2015 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David __JJ I — ^�y.r/ tial (�a �_ �s 3 �1•\ 'x1'11+}t �-�t w.ilue LLi ! �nliYlp Fl�jT -•� 1�`I u �J I 1 II I II (=S.IA"r.aK�:SrJ ELE dE I I "�"��—,���wCkMICIl�NLR]"�-� `�+ �i � •FIRE STATI7� RL Fg0.11 LY SPORTS CENTER 172J � I� BAI<SIUtY:UR �!N ... — rC TNIC>LLBLYC,RooOCATIO�F3i hNl•LLW UnD Di BEArULCM 7 I R ELEMENTARY PLA ST � l - ] is. �'nrvo'cnsrl i�K:fN7.f.TI:L.T! IJ I rMULBE_A SPI _ 1 Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments, and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review 515,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,500 Right -of -Way $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 50 Construction $0 $0 $715,000 $0 $0 $0 $715,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Contingency $0 $0 $71,000 $0 $0 $0 $71,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $500 $802,000 50 $0 $0 $817,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund (176) $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Measure I Fund (177) $0 5500 $802,000 $0 $0 $0 $802,500 Total Costs: $15,000 $500 $E02,000 50 $C;10 $817,500 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I Project Number: 800-2013-16 JL Key: 1854 Object: Haven Avenue from Wilson Avenue to North City limit - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Haven Avenue from Wilson Avenue to North City Limit Est. Construction Start/End: 8/2015 —10/2015 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Description: Justification: ....r...... .. .. .. ....�..�..�..o..va.o..�..�..�..�.. ................ TA'CtC5IE a��� f F7F; ��� ALr.704FT15 C h[UtV(1'ST Y 'Urm FRIA:L GRb'� ' i i tl _. PROJECT LO TION- LU ION , it HiDDEN:F:ARF.7-RL'-1 CARR AIZI.CT —��' C—'" i = 1 EDD DR �� IRI -AWAY -'Sl Si C�J1 LVI15r1TARU. IO1jIVE:ST;u, !V� Y G iii \\\\�Z) J=VIVJENID L CARAND-A-4T y = , it C LL Fd9N:4CC1Pi.. y. lIl L r _ C YlA6Ekt ORD_LN CgpRI p� A =PP&XN: :H CT = Q� MINTER C, T �s lr OPLR'S'� j�� �--RL WIl ON Av r j n fi �a�( s � N� RMOS!A1F]I tl J This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments, and pavement striping. This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $15,000 5500 $0 $0 $0 50 $15,500 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 50 $668,500 $0 $0 50 $668,500 Inspection & Administration so $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Contingency $0 $0 $66,500 $0 $0 50 $66,500 Total Costs: $15,000 $500 $750,000 $o $0 $0 $765,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund (176) $15,000 $0 $0 SO 50 $0 $15,000 Measure I Fund (177) $0 $500 $750,000 $0 50 $0 $750,500 Total Costs: $15,000 $500 $750,000. $0 $o $0 $76,500 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H15 Project Number: 800-2013-18 JL Key: 1816 Object: Hellman Avenue from Base Line Road to 19th Street - Pavement Rehabilitation L_!-------------- / . t is j �'5 1 I( Ia I - r CIT + �_ 6 � ����Y��NtJHET.•E �.J rigl::NeN¢,Tc r �E,rl.E Sf yNZiHF.TII:.�.T_ al! `JS(n;L:ufj) \I �— vjEt�vi � l__ --.I, L�µ a��• f / �.' I�� t°_LED'� � �' l4:5LTA:-qT- �O.�VERNP.fth^\.. 1I- 1 � P..4�SCT MPN RS':SIA:ST�_ PROJECT LOCATION;-, —pELITIaT !�^(())�� CAL ALTA LOMA { LA/G9`=1 I LEMENTARY rrF�l � •�'RaNdt�ar 4`I lII ,�J ALTA LOM4 ��J 'Li, rs�r1/ j 1 'tSuiyC� �LL;a2Jr / z HIGH <—Ta I�V�i' < —h OLL:RD.CST�uPi 'Z T ; ense_u� NRo r-1 r�-rscrr-re N,aol'ccT QP•=-�Fr�--_�E,'--, r— Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic $0 Project Location: Hellman Avenue from Base Line $0 Road to 19th Street $435,500 Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In Est. Construction Start/End: addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate. 8/2014-10/2014 2018/19 Project Status: Project Cost Estimate ($): Design $0 Department: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 Engineering TOTAL Project Manager: Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $25,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 Romeo David L_!-------------- / . t is j �'5 1 I( Ia I - r CIT + �_ 6 � ����Y��NtJHET.•E �.J rigl::NeN¢,Tc r �E,rl.E Sf yNZiHF.TII:.�.T_ al! `JS(n;L:ufj) \I �— vjEt�vi � l__ --.I, L�µ a��• f / �.' I�� t°_LED'� � �' l4:5LTA:-qT- �O.�VERNP.fth^\.. 1I- 1 � P..4�SCT MPN RS':SIA:ST�_ PROJECT LOCATION;-, —pELITIaT !�^(())�� CAL ALTA LOMA { LA/G9`=1 I LEMENTARY rrF�l � •�'RaNdt�ar 4`I lII ,�J ALTA LOM4 ��J 'Li, rs�r1/ j 1 'tSuiyC� �LL;a2Jr / z HIGH <—Ta I�V�i' < —h OLL:RD.CST�uPi 'Z T ; ense_u� NRo r-1 r�-rscrr-re N,aol'ccT QP•=-�Fr�--_�E,'--, r— Total Costs: Project Funding: Funding Source Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) Total Costs: Impact on Operations: r $25,500 Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic $0 signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments, and pavement striping. $0 $0 $435,500 Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In 2015/16 addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate. 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Project Cost Estimate ($): $410,000 $0 $0 Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018119 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $25,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $25,500 Right -of -Way $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $340,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $340,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,000 Contingency $0 $34,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,000 Total Costs: Project Funding: Funding Source Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) Total Costs: Impact on Operations: r $25,500 $410,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $435,500 Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL 525,500 $410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $435,500 $25,500 $410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $435,500 Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. MU 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I Project Number: 800-2012-29 JL Key: 1815 Object: Hermosa Avenue from Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Hermosa Avenue from Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 9/2016-10/2016 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Description: Justification: I i j l� fJhTLI! f: T j /SC / � ; l— al � WILSON AVE u 0. �a IERMOSA I� I iELEMENTARY u� I o z�i/ ^fir-, JAY �' � j= •.� ka t 'urt' '•\•` W ;�� I C��--'amu..—s 1 , .--r-�-- }I d 1 '' iGTlCCEN:5.T1 `�'CAr /) 6 I— / 44n`, �L�.EI��@Ui51-V'LV __ Q 4,rr ffAN74NI.TP.�FB�1i �� NI�RYWUU�CL� � ) I 4 LJ11 IW �a la I N,5 C � ^I IIAFN IYIC'1 W •} /� J R ' ��I.IRFR4Vi1 `i LA.! This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay and striping. This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES so $0 5o s0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 So $10,500 Right-of-way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $230,000 $0 $0 $0 $230,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Contingency $0 $0 $20,000 SO $0 SO $20,000 Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $260,000 s0 $0 $0 $270,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360 (174) $10,000 $500 $0 so $0 s0 510,500 Unfunded $0 $0 $260,000 $0 $0 $0 $260,000 Total Costs: $10,000 <cnn $260,000 $n $O SO $270,5u"O Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs other needed areas. and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to H17 Project Number: 800-2012-24 1L Key: 1793 Object: Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation - !?, •^� t, �JI` ::J Ll Is PROJECT LOCATIONUJ z a 11lUISCU.<CT a v —O �C�i�' i _ `•--�� KIN(:STUN 5 .' ; ; � l � F L'—LEf10N:IC✓E V19 -ESPERANZA �15RIS.ToCrql W w W r C.AtuYICRQ-si rQ AT�N:ST HI GI:iI:P:ND:AV � _� Project Location: Lemon Avenue from Archibald LN 2 W = . Avenue to Haven Avenue AVE !Z (Q n (� .,,INCH Est. Construction Start/End: FY 2017/18 t Project Status: Design Department: Engineering ' Project Manager: Curt Billings - !?, •^� t, �JI` ::J Ll Is PROJECT LOCATIONUJ z a 11lUISCU.<CT a v —O �C�i�' i _ `•--�� KIN(:STUN 5 .' ; ; � l � F L'—LEf10N:IC✓E V19 -ESPERANZA �15RIS.ToCrql W w W r C.AtuYICRQ-si rQ AT�N:ST HI GI:iI:P:ND:AV � _� S + .m BER �?'"oR1'FFT� (r,4 X1',1 ARIJ`f+ J > W z t > l �w71 a IC :r W '- �< V. I4 1 > f j I I Y IC �= is f i> X I� " •w.—�[i �-lll""">��'�—�IW' '-a ��gIRISTIIInL DRU C --a I2 VINEYARD --� JUNIOR HIGH jJ LN 2 W = . AVE !Z (Q n (� .,,INCH Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay and ' striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. ' Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 50 5o $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 $500 $500 5o 50 $11,500 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction 50 $0 5o $o $500,000 $0 $500,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $o $10,000 $0 510,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 50 $50,000 $0 $50,000 Total Costs: 510,000 $500 $500 $500 $560,000 $0 $571,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Prop 42 Fund (190) $10,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $10,000 Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) $0 $500 $500 $500 $0 $0 $1,500 Unfunded $0 50 $0 _ $0 $560,000 So $560,OGG Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $500 $560,000 $0 $571,500 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs and crack seal, thus freeing I other needed areas. up maintenance crews to attend to H18 Project Number: 800-2014-03 JL Key: 1022 Object: Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation at Various locations Project Location: Various Locations Est. Construction Start/End: 5/2015 - 7/2015 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David 77 =;-` .._ILLS_ :r. �. •'�..,_ rr� ;.- _i 'PROJECT�LOCATION Wit=; • r �n-y • : Lu r �i } Description: This project involves slurry seals and asphalt overlays. Justification: This project if a slurry seal will seal the street thus extending the pavement life and if a pavement 171 road surface to a substantially new - JT r.. -r --7 7i.'', Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) $1,721,380 $850,000 Tc $0 $0 $2,571,380 :ill —� `1J .-,�{ ;„ C�i: "1.:= _?•� iL�..:: /ur..C.'*�.�•d. :i ... I: I:ri:i.' '� _.-.i 77 =;-` .._ILLS_ :r. �. •'�..,_ rr� ;.- _i 'PROJECT�LOCATION Wit=; • r �n-y • : Lu r �i } Description: This project involves slurry seals and asphalt overlays. Justification: This project if a slurry seal will seal the street thus extending the pavement life and if a pavement overlay will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) $1,721,380 $850,000 Project Cost Estimate ($): $0 $0 $2,571,380 Prop 42 Fund (190) $71,390 $109,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $180,390 Expenditure/Category Last Fiscal Year 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Design/Plan Review $30,000 $30,000 $o $0 $0 So $60,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $1,550,000 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,350,000 Inspection & Administration $62,770 549,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $111,770 Contingency $150,000 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $230,000 Total Costs: $1,792,770 5959,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $2,751,770 Project Funding: Funding Source Last Fiscal Year 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) $1,721,380 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,571,380 Prop 42 Fund (190) $71,390 $109,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $180,390 Total Costs: $1,792,770 $959,000 $0 $0 $O SO 52,751,770 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and attend to other needed areas. crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to H19 0 1 1 Project Location: Madrone Avenue from North of 9th Street Est. Construction Start/End: 6/2014-7/2014 ' Project Status: Design and Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Project Number: 800-2012-30 A Key: 1818 Object: Madrone Avenue from North of 9th Street - Widening carr{icy c PROJECT LO.CATIO LOS AMIGOS ELEMENTARY U �O 2 L 4 z c Description: This project adds 320 linear feet of street widening and 3 street lights along the frontage of the new Southwest Park that will be constructed concurrently. Justification: This project will provide ADA accessibility and improve pedestrian and vehicle safety along the steet frontage of the new Southwest Park. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $o $0 So $0 ' Design/Plan Review $0 $500 $0 $o $0 $0 $500 Right -of -Way $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $114,200 $0 $0 $0 $114,200 Inspection & Administration $0 $o $0 $0 $o 50 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $0 $13,000 Total Costs: $0 $500 $127,200 $0 $0 $0 $127,700 Project Funding: Funding Source Gas Tax RT7360 (174) Prior Years $0 2014/15 $500 2015/16 $127,200 2016/17 L _ $0 2017/18 $0 2018/19 $0 TOTAL $127,700 Total Costs: $0 $500 $127,200 $0 $0 $0 $127,700 Impact on Operations: This project adds 3 street lights to Street Light Maintenace districts SLD 2 and SLD 6. H 20 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I Project Number: 800-2012-26 JL Key: 1821 Object: Rochester Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Rochester Avenue from Foothill Boulevad to Base Line Road Est. Construction Start/End: 9/2016-10/2016 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings w ----- •z o= -N r— ' c � :v N�_x41 Yi9 ZP 0.) m C��i{' MAUHiGAL—PL , ��TN12 V��� n �"',21D J VtN. LSv�TERRA VISTA A rJ.AET-a ST J VI TORI,4 A#B RS ELEMENT ��E A-1 �I II I GMOLIN`T` N VIEW PjAF3 Z W� v !W, Z UE'D C.tiU.F;CF7:ST, �Y �n �G JL'iLll('AL M1TFR'C 9ILLIKEN PARK ////// IO' ILJI �n i NUR'H:rAAMSiEE-7- 1/ Com. 'A FIFURU,S' f > 4� I ROJECT LOCATION Nr RW' :S , j�Q Y EN- � SL7 iT `—&VLkSAILL-Ee STAFFORD sr �l o iI ftt 1 IERV".IL-ST Z of / `LW- F_OI IIDTt(LL F3L-1 ` Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay and striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 5500 $0 $0 $0 $11,000 Right -of -Way $o $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Construction $0 $o $0 $520,000 $0 50 $520,000 Inspection & Administration $o $0 $o $10,000 $0 $0 $10,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $60,000 50 5o 560,000 Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $590,000 $0 $0 $601,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund (177) $10,000 $500 $500 $590,000 $0 $0 $601,000 Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $590,000 $0 $0 $601,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H21 Project Number: 800-2014-09 1L Key: 1877 Object: San Bernardino Road from Carnelian Street to Archibald Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: San Bernardino Road from Carnelian Street to Archibald Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 08 /2015 -10/2015 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David G� GUthIWILM COMMUNITY PAL%ila W MIDDLEA P� •t. r _ I _r19u RC N:sT w- �•re I _,J �_ "el.i Im ii LJ aI,d nFY�Y'^tK 0 S I I 1 n K.s'ty Gt 'FLR, 4 '-- i�' :.IPRO.JECTI LOCATION ' Q /'/ \�' � ^' I=•_�-!¢ a I I' �\ I `Ix �a i w 1 FCN� f s A •I x I �,AF�Clt4%:r ELEME RC FAMILY SPORTS CENTER ' j 1f I J `—�:EiAR:-Ow=LkJ ` Illi � L�IR:.'Ii�T�J ply �IJ I�� Illll I = I IIE<TAt1A:C Tl JAf.N=RAUUiT -0R I cODitfILL BLVD I IMULI-L LN I v !i ill ii nitE:.T� I� u, 12 ;: Cr4L.^•C'yCy II Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments, and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($j: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 50 Design/Plan Review $0 $20,000 So 50 5o $0 $20,000 Right -of -Way 50 So 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $245,000 $0 $0 $0 $245,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $o 50 $10,000 Contingency $0 $0 $20,000 $0 50 50 $20,000 Total Costs: 50 $20,000 $275,000 $0 $0 $0 $295,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) $0 $20,000 5275,000 $0 $0 50 5295,000 Total Costs: So $20,000 $275,000 50 50 SO $295,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H 22 Project Number: 800-2014-05 1L Key: 1878 Object: Spruce Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Spruce Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Raod Est. Construction Start/End: 08 /2015 -10/2015 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Description: QLyP /........... �.......... .......-...` . ..�..... Z `�' GOLDY LEWIS COMMUNITY CENTER tgp:�l —r ---.TB E LINE-RD—LL I— > r 2 i. e I IBJ t } i t� muirf+F rot -ON 2.2. 3 z i I TE CANYON PARK l TER DO MERGED= aFt�ELEI �TR �L RtENTAIRY I FaAN ROVE Sr � TRUTH MUSSPARK I /� / MIDDLE f �� PROJECT LOCATIO SPRUCE qVE 1; PARK T-CREENW,4Y PARV —� Etal•OeK-si IJ < C t , / ���)l IJIILLIK� RK 'SMF oRb-sJ _ .� lc0 OTE CANYON L-MENTARY RYIICK-5T--V J� ` �. CfeEN-sr ''—z 1 r�R SET -S-7 y � � I U ALP M. LEWIS PARK AI F ORD -Sr --1 1iF. C;15 -(i7 f a I ! , F00(HILL AVE. FO L--BL-VD i Il This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments, and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 so $0 so $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $30,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 so so So $0 So Construction 50 50 $531,000 $0 $0 $0 $531,000 Inspection & Administration s0 so $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Contingency 50 so S54,000 so s0 so $54,000 Total Costs: $0 $30,000 $600,000 $0 $0 50 $630,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015116 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) $0 $30,000 $600,000 so so $0 $630,000 Total Costs: 50 $30,000 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $630,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H 23 11 !I� Project Number: 800-2013-21 JL Key: 1838 Object: Victoria Street from Etiwanda Avenue to East City Limits --Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Victoria Street from Etiwanda Avenue to East City Limit Est. Construction Start/End: 4/2016-6/2016 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings — 1239 _N \\. �L1yi FL'lC 4't; T�1 I �jl]HER:D •�.\�,1\�rN4L'_CTl � I (moi I� Z �`� ��¢ i I �`A al.rssroRJ ��� I � J PROJECTILOCATIO I -� i II I ETIWANDA LESk�s i i•E HIGH . .. j nwAN.f� r LAU,LL. 'W _P CT IN P.MEDIA:TE J.VIA'.RFfirP:%—R n II`II�y' �j ��, la /) IA-TESDIiD:I]N=6 Description: This project involves curb and gutter, sidewalks, asphalt pavement, cold planning, ac overlay, striping and flashing beacon for pedestians crossing the street at Etiwanda High School. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending the pavement life, use, and rideability. The project will also add sidewalks and a flashing beacon for improved pedestrian access to two local schools. Project Cost Estimate ($): Construction Inspection & Administration Contingency Total Costs: $0 $o $0 $0 so $o $324,000 $50,000 $32,000 $0 $0 $o Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES Design/Plan Review Right -of -Way $0 $0 $34,850 $500 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 $p $0 $0 $35,350 $o $o H 24 Construction Inspection & Administration Contingency Total Costs: $0 $o $0 $0 so $o $324,000 $50,000 $32,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $324,000 $50,000 $32,000 $34,850 $500 $406,000 $0 50 $0 $441,350 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Transportation Fund (124) Measure I Fund (176) Total Costs: Prior Years $24,500 $10,000 2014/15 $500 $0 2015/16 $56,000 $350,000 2016/17 $0 $0 2017/1 $0 $O 2018 19 SO SO TOTAL $81,000 $360,000 $3450G . $500 .. S406. 00A .. ........ .yn. c!+ SC �A41,000 Impact on Operations: Will reduce routine maintenance costs for pothole and crack repairs. H 24 Project Number: 800-2012-22 JL Key: 1601 Object: Youngs Canyon Road from Koch Place to Cherry Avenue - Street Extension Project Location: Youngs Canyon Road from Koch Place to Cherry Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 4/2015-10/2015 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings z V.LS ON AVF —L-AUP.ELTREVUH—) If I / M � 1� r 2�J 17 _LAQI S � _ .. �1 a� '1 �,�PRO JECT LOCATIOIN _�� ` \ LEGACY PIM f NH SUMMIT ,ARK \ • � •\` � :!`sy�,-0} C /,�: j) � •.-., 1 • ` `�LNL•! `�OvIO.rr-- 4 II rOUNGS CANTON n0 ,LANE GROVE PARK ti P Description: The extension of Youngs Canyon Road between Koch Place and Cherry Avenue will construct a 4 lane road across a flood control basin and connect to Cherry Avenue. Justification: This extension of Youngs Canyon Road will provide a secondary access to development west of Cherry Avenue and an easterly extension of Banyan Street which connects to Youngs Canyon Road to the west. It will also relieve traffic congestion on Wilson Avenue to the north. Project Cost Estimate (Sj Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 Design/Plan Review $140,000 5100,000 $0 50 $0 $800,000 $1,040,000 Right -of -Way 5o $0 $0 $o $0 $500,000 $500,000 Construction 5o So So So So $10,000,000 $10,000,000 Inspection & Administration $o So $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Total Costs: $140,000 5100,000 50 s0 50 $13,000,000 513,240,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2016/17 2017/18 2017/18 TBD TOTAL AD 88-2 Etiw/Highlnd Impry (813) $140,000 $100,000 $0 $o 5o $13,000,000 $13,240,000 Total Costs: $140,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $13,000,000 $13,240,000 Impact on Operations: Adds 1,500 feet of roadway to the City's street maintenance program. A more detailed cost estimate will be available after the preliminary design phase is complete. H 25 Projects included in this section are typically those that will promote safe and efficient traffic circulation per State and local design standards. Many of these projects include new signals, upgrades to intersections - such as additional turn pockets or signal timing upgrades - as well as synchronization and coordination projects that promote traffic flows along the City's heaviest traveled arterial streets. Traffic Projects are typically funded via Transportation Development Funds (124), Measure 1 (177), Gas Tax Funds (170, 172, and 174), Street Lighting Districts and some grant funding. Project List & FY 2014-15 Expenditures I. 6th St. @ Utica Ave - New Traffic $12,500 Installation 2. Carnelian St. @ Banyan St. $300,000 New Traffic Signal Installation 3. Milliken Ave. Traffic Signals $125,000 Upgrade Left Turn Phases 4. Traffic Management Center- $280,000 Upgrade Project Citywide Total $717,500 Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 ■ Transportation $717,500 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Project Location: 6th Street at Utica Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 3/2016 — 5/2016 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Jason Welday Project Number: 800-2014-12 JL Key: 1889 Object: 6th Street at Utica Avenue - Traffic Signal Installation ECT LOCATION EMPIRE EMPIRE L I Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, installation of traffic signals and related equipment at 6th Street and Utica Avenue. Justification: The installation of traffic signals will improve traffic safety and reduce traffic congestion. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $12,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,500 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $12,500 $0 $0 $0 $12,500 Contingency $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Total Costs: $0 $12,500 $287,500 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Transportation (124) $0 512,500 $287,500 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Total Costs: $0 $12,500 $287,500 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance. The estimated cost of electricity and maintenance for a traffic signal is $2,500 per year. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I Project Number: 800-2014-08 JL Key: 1887 Object: Carnelian Street at Banyan Street- Traffic Signal Installation Project Location: Carnelian Street at Banyan Street Est. Construction Start/End: 11/2014 —1/2015 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Jason Welday Description: uJ _ 99:-5 Q 4.%. M4 W/1V.L 'T'-- �f a ¢ ¢ I �1z �LL = 3 iUN7.Tf NC CT z ALTA LOMA �T JUNIOR HIGH L` =�a Li, i—J�-W— W .00 Y: >• > V I.a .. I (W� � 2 lT '¢ o C I IC (� I IQ v I PR®JECT-L914dAT ` � -S �> LJ'� '� u v - —� r�ANC.L>T F N a� W J l ♦ > EKQrDR N ���16 �C-4 ��a�� v ANAL •.tdAilR�:_ j a L H; sHl AN7 AVL 6 7 WEST BERYL PARK EAST BERYL PAI 1 770 The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, installation of traffic signals and related equipment at Carnelian Street and Banyan Street. Justification: The installation of traffic signals will improve traffic safety and reduce traffic congestion. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $12,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,500 Right -of -Way So $0 $o $o 5o $0 $o Construction $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $12,500 $0 $0 $o $0 $12,500 Contingency $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Total Costs: $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Transportation (124) $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Total Costs: $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance. The estimated cost of electricity and maintenance for a traffic signal is $2,500 per year. IF, Project Number: 800-2014-06 1L Key: 1875 Object: Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard Traffic Signals - Upgrade Various Left Turn Phases Project Location: Various Locations along Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard Est. Construction Start/End: 1/2015 —4/2015 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Jason Welday t�' ^' �,�-'L fir••-'����'�L IL,�� I i P:tD— pi ` .. � � .a > `�.'vi; ,c 2� / _� T � jn�—may � � �a•� d ,� _<_ � '1 � � j-�� Fibs;:-vP— /•�/_50NnRi >vP.J Y.�• 1 " :1NPA �•�`;J i� .,I,I .AVE r;��� sib. - V ,! �'� ...� I '•., r� ! �7� � / I . , � � • w— ����� •+ ,-PROTECT LOCATION rU:L+rr a a I yi,� `V1CTOM RU�v PAR pJr"• `�pLa 1�D AN ow• PROJECT LOCATION`wryK,IN�AGE I I �_.--.,•_ I • I L -f •I�II� A _�—-�-������� __'�-� I•Af.IF IC'E li(C:HIC'T AIL �'D4 i WLI+LJN Jrt-�+ iY }I rt /y .V .IAgED 5RULTE .'.CNIUR ZENTER� [lig ~ F ;EINA PRKII I '-_ _~ FIRE STATI ON� Y RANCno cu;:wNCNCA CENTRn�F{�i i -J , c_x1.Nn.r ,,.� :• Y i _ I� r-� Y " —V' �• `�: OLpT LEWIB CCMIMV NITY,CENTeR I• �' JI n . - I. i �_ - S rlD�e 11�� IN J� it\. �'.�� n •ipRIGItL- I T�rAT^ y: 1.•' -\ / L`,YO 1E" OM1 PA I r P`-�'• IIO ALR;11 VICTOW AR Jrp Y' ✓ V6 ' � yN21UNTA 1\n vr,CW PARK `� `t ! 1 Y My„�-...-.(! •.STI `A�4 Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, removing protected -permissive left turn phasing and replacing with protected left turn phasing for the traffic signals on Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. $0 $0 Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by providing an exclusive phase for left turn vehicle movements. In addition, pedestrian crossings will occur separate from left turn movements, which previously occurred simultaneously with protected -permissive traffic signal equipment. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $o $0 $0 50 $0 Design/Plan Review so $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Right -of -Way $0 $o $o So $o $o $0 Construction $0 $100,000 $0 50 $0 50 $100,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $10,000 5o $0 $0 50 $10,000 Contingency $0 510,000 $0 50 $0 5o $10,000 Total Costs: 50 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Transportation (124) $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 Total Costs: $0 $125,000 $0 $0 SO $0 $125,000 Impact on Operations: After installation and configuration of the protected left turn traffic signal equipment, no additional impacts on operations will be present. 13 Project Number: 800-2012-17 1L Key: 1831 Object: Traffic Management Center - Upgrade Project Citywide Project Location: Base Line Road and Foothill Boulevard from West City Limits to East City Limits Est. Construction Start/End: 12/2014 —6/2015 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Jason Welday r� - ---r. ........ 'L'CAF UVPtiFR:7': tL # :: 1 _y integrating these —PUN rc::s -L'IG TOv> `4R NF. TFOL MN: �i .. • -. e... <-^ NI itC 1 �:. o ; K _l s,_I,, � PA x i CM1IPIFF 1 A Fs C. F. c Imo' 1...•-�'�-i� __,�A -r...:J_� - r (y,EWC[NIEF jPOFTS COMPLEX i I r :AA�m,[Isi•u�c is ccwn.0 . .!!1.< ............... W FIFE STATION Description: Line Road and Foothill Boulevard intersections, and integrating these —PUN rc::s i i signals for improved traffic flow and safety. JI ....��.�-n 'I f I •u�—FTM3l�. ilii- c Project Cost Estimate ($�: Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, upgrading system hardware and software at the Base Line Road and Foothill Boulevard intersections, and integrating these intersections into the Traffic Management Center. Justification: The project will upgrade communications to enable better monitoring, re -timing and coordination of the City's traffic signals for improved traffic flow and safety. Project Cost Estimate ($�: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015116 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Consultant Services 50 $11,000 50 50 $0 $0 $11,000 Staff Training $0 $0 $0 SO 50 $0 50 Design/Equipment Specifications $o 511,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000 Procurement/Construction 5278,000 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $498,000 System Testing and Integration 516,000 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 532,000 Contingency $6,000 $22,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $28,000 Total Costs: $300,000 $280,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $580,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Transportation (124) $300,000 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $580,000 Total Costs: $300,000 $280,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $580,000 Impact on Operations: Communication to Base Line Road and Foothill Boulevard will improve maintenance, staff efficiencies and reduce related costs. These system upgrades .v!!! a!so provide substantia! improvements in system -wide signal timing and coordination, improving operational efficiencies, while also resulting in fewer citizen complaints. 14 could be waiting on grant approval, or perhaps until new special fund monies become available. Projects showing dedicated funding sources, but which are slated to occur in future fiscal years have mostly likely been delayed due to issues with the future funding of operating expenses. In many cases funds can be found for the capital construction of a project like a new library or community center, but City management has not yet devised a way to fund the neces- sary staff or overhead expenses required to run a new facility. We have included this section to illustrate those priority projects that did not make it into the FY 2014/15 budget for either of these reasons. Staff is actively pursuing grant or other fundraising opportunities for several of the projects in this section. Project List & Future Expenditures I . Archibald Ave, Church to Palo Alto, $1,215,000 Storm Drain ElPD 85 Redemption 2. Archibald Ave, from N/O Norbrook $103,000 to Carrari St Municipal Utility 3. Central Prk-Replace Flooring $125,000 4. Civic Ctr - Earthquake Strapping $50,000 5. Civic Ctr and Public Sfty Bldg - $20,000 ADA Assessment Exterior Glass 6. Etiwanda Ave Electric Line Exten- $602,500 sion, Arrow to Foothill 7. Etiwanda Ave -Grade Separation @ $40,000,000 Metrolink Tracks 8. Etiwanda Creek Park -Phase II $5,580,000 9. Fire District -Banyan Station 175 $2,500,000 Expansion 10. Fire District -Central Station 178 $8.000,000 (New station) 11. Fire District-Operation/Dispatch $11,000,000 Bldg 12. Fire District -San Bernardino Station $6,500,000 172 Relocation 13. Foothill Blvd from Grove -San $4,630,000 Bernardino Rd— Widen Median 14. Haven Ave from Wilson-Vivienda- $125,000 Community Trail 15. Hermosa Ave from the Alta Loma $2,245,000 Basin to Wilson -SD 16. Lemon Avenue from Haven to 1300 $1,700,000 ft west -Storm Drain 17. Miller Ave at East Ave -New Traffic $300,000 Signal Installation Project List & Future Expenditures 18. Pacific Electric Trail Enhancements- $110,000 West to East City Limits 19. Red Hill Prk-Pedestrian Paseo $100,000 20. Safety Lighting -upgrades @ Various $150,000 Intersections 21. Upper Cucamonga SD Phase III $3,900,000 J Total $88,955,500 Potential Future Sources of Funding $1 $1 $195 $450,C $5,580, $28,000 $602.500 $53,918,000 ■ Unknown Fire Capital Projects ■ Park Development ■ Transportation ElPD 85 Redemption ❑ Citywide Infrastructure Beautification ❑ Capital Reserves Municipal Utility 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Project Number: 800-2012-14 JL Key: 1805 Object: Archibald Avenue from Church Street to Palo Alto Street - Storm Drain Project Location: Archibald Avenue from Church Street to Palo Alto Street Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status: Design and Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Description: T ESTr� BASE LINE RD a N+ 'R EAST FI PEPP_ER ST r `f//� w 1 ARCH15ALD LIBRARY = �/ f Q IR��NW.U.CrD ST f rrw -J iz ; 1I __ 1u:J �1G Q ;} j} _��` UJ u Z �. } jJ Q LL.� VVA:II-NL1lT-jrT !Z Z��' ; �J iY O W—Y—PALC£ACTCY:S.T UJ—� J. S =`-PRO:IECT Ie®CJATI®IV' a U. CUICANWIN[GA :C wMIDDLE "E!_ { J is �� ` iZ < t Q . < ao�131 F. Y,EW=ST to—_�l L`. * IO Q �z. a g v Z VCLN I' N� S� S) - Construct I -77 AUTON C L. Construct a Master Planned Storm Drain, install catch basins, manholes, and laterals. Justification: This project will improve drainage within the area. Project Cost Estimate (S): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $0 5o $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review 5o so 50 $0 5o $35,000 535,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 s0 Construction $0 so 50 $o $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Inspection & Administration so so $o So So $80,000 $80,000 Contingency 5o $0 $0 50 $0 $100,000 $100,000 Total Costs: so s0 $0 $0 $0 $1,215,000 $1,225,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Unfunded $0 $0 so so $0 $1,215,000 $1,215,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $1,215,000 $1,215,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance, potholes, sand bags for storm water protection and storm water cleanup, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. 11 ri Project Number: 800-2013-11 JL Key: 1830 Object: Archibald Avenue from North of Norbrook to Carrari Street - Community Trail West Side Project Manager: Romeo David / • ;rte Nrf$� ALMDIJI.^.S r �� r,fNQEN-iARM:R D-_,,.) a®A JEPT ® OCAT'® r R v�`.® ` y Ars RAR1:C.1= �� PARK FIRE STATI, 177 �7� Description: Construction of an equestrian trail on the west side of Archibald Avenue. Project includes installation of two rail PVC fence, decompose granite and mow curbs. Justification: This project will connect to the existing community trail at the west side of Achibald Avenue and is part of the trail master plan. It will also improve the appearance of the west side of Archibald Avenue. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Project Location: West side of Archibald Avenue 2014/15 from north of Norbrook to Carrari 2016/17 Street TBD Design Project Manager: Romeo David / • ;rte Nrf$� ALMDIJI.^.S r �� r,fNQEN-iARM:R D-_,,.) a®A JEPT ® OCAT'® r R v�`.® ` y Ars RAR1:C.1= �� PARK FIRE STATI, 177 �7� Description: Construction of an equestrian trail on the west side of Archibald Avenue. Project includes installation of two rail PVC fence, decompose granite and mow curbs. Justification: This project will connect to the existing community trail at the west side of Achibald Avenue and is part of the trail master plan. It will also improve the appearance of the west side of Archibald Avenue. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Est. Construction Start/End: 2014/15 To be determined 2016/17 Project Status: TBD Design Environmental/NPDES Department: $0 Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David / • ;rte Nrf$� ALMDIJI.^.S r �� r,fNQEN-iARM:R D-_,,.) a®A JEPT ® OCAT'® r R v�`.® ` y Ars RAR1:C.1= �� PARK FIRE STATI, 177 �7� Description: Construction of an equestrian trail on the west side of Archibald Avenue. Project includes installation of two rail PVC fence, decompose granite and mow curbs. Justification: This project will connect to the existing community trail at the west side of Achibald Avenue and is part of the trail master plan. It will also improve the appearance of the west side of Archibald Avenue. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $10,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,500 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $88,200 $88,200 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,800 $9,800 Total Costs: $10,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $103,000 $113,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Beautification Fund (110) $10,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $10,500 Unknown $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $103,000 $103,000 Total Costs: $0 �_.._.: $0 $1033;000 $113,500.. Impact on Operations: This project will add an additional quarter mile to the City's trail system, which will require trash removal, weed abatement, and routine maintenance. However, it will also remove 1,000 linear feet of City maintained public landscape, saving the City approximately $1,100 year. Staff is currently seeking grant funds for construction. J2 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I Project Number: 1L Key: Object: 5295 Central Park - Replace Flooring Project Location: Central Park Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status: Design Department: Public Works Services Project Manager: Ty Quaintance _ 7 I? ;l,r l;iV.l f.W,LZRJ / cr PRQJECTT r RANCHO CUCAMONGA W Jj�a� Q . . l oilx I Z N;VP.a Y 17%!T1 T u �} .I tird� NT..YlAY�- «(U v Ic Description: Replace flooring in the Drier Hall and the Rancho Cucamonga Hall at the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center. Justification: The flooring in these two meeting halls are deteriorating as a result needs to be replaced. of heavy use. For safety and aesthetic reasons, the flooring Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o Design/Plan Review $5;000 Right -of -Way $0 Construction $0 $o 50 $0 So $0 50 5o $0 50 50 $0 $o $0 $0 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 50 $5,000 50 $125,000 Inspection & Administration $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 50 50 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $5,000 50 50 $0 $0 $125,000 $130,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Captial Reserve (025) $5,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $125,000 $130,000 Total Costs: $5,000 $0 $0 $p $0 $125,000 $130,000 Impact on Operations: With the continuous daily events scheduled in these main halls, staff will need to coordinate with CSD so that a sufficient block of time is set aside for the contractor to remove and replace the marmoleum in Drier and Rancho Cucamonga Halls. J3 0 n Project Location: 10500 Civic Center Drive Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status: Design ' Department: Public Works Services J i Project Manager: Ty Quaintance Project Number: 1L Key: Object: Civic Center - Earthquake Strapping 1. AF Description: Install earthquake strapping to City equipment (including file cabinets) throughout the Civic Center. Justification: Shaking caused by a strong earthquake may tip over or move office equipment thereby increasing chances of injury or damage. Installation of earthquake strapping will secure equipment in place. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years YOO7HI _ Flw G_4A.FF-{i 2016/17 Q• 1z 2; yip II JJ J¢: 6 i3 z TOTAL LAUKGL:u.I— �\ . "` I $D 50 So $o 50 $0 so 5o $o 5o So $0 50 50 $0 $o So 50 $o $0 $0 5o So 50 UTY HALL " d '• iR0pLICE STATION 1 of .— —� • '' ml 50 50 �lu PROJECT LOCATIO $0 cMeLKr:.ESanrs $50,000 �- Q J' a4 Izl OI ill fr f �l I T a Description: Install earthquake strapping to City equipment (including file cabinets) throughout the Civic Center. Justification: Shaking caused by a strong earthquake may tip over or move office equipment thereby increasing chances of injury or damage. Installation of earthquake strapping will secure equipment in place. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES Design/Plan Review Right -of -Way Construction Inspection & Administration Contingency $D 50 So $o 50 $0 so 5o $o 5o So $0 50 50 $0 $o So 50 $o $0 $0 5o So 50 S0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 SO 50 $50,000 $O 50 $0 $0 50 $50,000 $0 $0 Total Costs: 50 50 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Capital Reserve (025) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 Total Costs: 50 50 $0 SD $D $50,000 $50,000 Impact on Operations: Temporary inconvenience to Civic Center personnel while earthquake strapping being installed to their equipment J4 r C Project Number: 1L Key: Object: 5602 Civic Center and Public Safety Building - ADA assessment of Exterior Doors Project Location: 10500 Civic Center Drive Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status: Design Department: Public Works Services Project Manager: Ty Quaintance ir0 al ciunnrenL wcv S PROJECT LOCATIO rkrl.N V.F%A CIR CITY HALL `A� RCl!11160LICE STATION``_! , a u ARROW Nit Description: Conduct an assessment of public and employee entrances to the City Hall and Public Safety Buildings to meet current ADA accessibility standards. Justification: The City Hall and Public Safety Buildings are over 25 years old and no longer meet ADA accessibility standards. An ADA assessment should be compiled outlining required modifications on the exterior doors to meet current ADA standards. 1 Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $o 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 So $20,000 5o $0 $0 SO $20,000 Right -of -Way $0 5o So So $0 So $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 50 Inspection & Administration So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 50 50 50 $0 50 $o Total Costs: $0 $O $20,000$0 So $0 $20,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Capital Reserve (025) $0 $0 $20,000 5o $0 $0 $20,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 SO $20,000 Impact on Operations: No Impact. I J5 1 1 1 I Project Number: JL Key: 1885 Object: Etiwanda Avenue Electric Line Extension from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard Project Location: Etiwanda Avenue Electric Line Extension from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Fred Lyn &nJ PAUL BIANE LIBRARY I I )__JU PERDEY I -, H:69AINS: REE'---- � !R ELE[dENTAY C n '�lLL' II II i W . {5. Lu E•T_S_ ��C-VLRSAINTS-STJ /r,ARCIA=�R GARCIA P RK V-CHn sT I I VICT.OF;Iq_GIARDENSLN�� 11-57 U !J J 7 VINE:&Ty iZD ;PROJECT LOCATION COMPLEX 4NY.zr)R+r- I R / I C Description: Distribution Line Extension east of the 1-15 freeway to service vacant parcels on the corner of Foothill Blvd and Etiwanda Ave with RCMU electricity. Justification: Line extension is needed to extend power service on Etiwanda Avenue to service vacant parcels on the corner Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The City paid SCE exit fees for the right to service any load associated with a newly constructed facility or undeveloped parcels that has never been interconnected with Edison; this falls under that category. Project Cost Estimate �$): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016 17 _� 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES Design/Plan Review Right -of -Way Construction Inspection & Administration Contingency $0 $o So So $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $2,500 So $500,000 $0 $100,000 $o $o $0 $0 $0 So $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $o $o So $0 $0 $o S0 $2,500 so $500,000 $0 $100,000 Total Costs: $o $0 $602,500 50 $o $o $602,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Municipal Utility (Fund 705) Prior Years $0 2014 15 $0 '015 16 =�_�x6 $602,500 i... 50 20;.7 1.8 $0 %7i.8 19 $o --- TOTAL $602,500 Total Costs: $0 $0 $602,500 $0 $0 SO $602,500 Impact on Operations: The increased electricity load will provide additional revenue to RCMU. J6 1 1 1 1 1 1 Project Number: JL Key: 1076 Object: Etiwanda Avenue - Grade Separation at Metrolink Tracks Project Location: _ t1 Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street ��ARRow:R.r.E IC—n r to Arrow Route � I :1//� "71 1 Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings PROJECT LOCATION ~ A; F RAILROAD — - Description: Prepare preliminary design drawings for a future grade separation on Etiwanda Avenue at the Metrolink Railroad Crossing south of Whitram Avenue. Justification: This project will improve safety and traffic circulation on Etiwanda Avenue. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES Design/Plan Review Right -of -Way Construction Inspection & Administration Contingency $0 $337,000 $o $0 $0 $o $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO 50 $0 So $o SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $3,500,000 $32,000,000 $500,000 $3,000,000 SO $1,337,000 $3,500,000 $32,000,000 $500,000 $3,000,000 Total Costs: $337,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $40,000,000 $40,337,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Transportation Fund (124) Unknown Prior Years $337,000 $o 2014/15 50 $0 2015/16 $0 $o 2016/17 50 $o 2017/18 $0 50 TBD $5,000,000 $35,000,000. TOTAL $5,337,000 $3.5,00000 Total Costs: $337,000 SO $0 $0 _ $0 $40,000,000 $40,337,000 Impact on Operations: Added maintenance costs for a new bridge will be determined during design phase J7 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I Project Location: 5939 East Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status: Design Department: Community Services/Parks Project Manager: Nettie Nielsen Description: Project Number: JL Key: 1664 Object: Etiwanda Creek Park - Phase II — Q! N *ETIWANA P.A E TIWANDL G!1LCJNY ELEMENTARYMMUNITY pARK N 4 rARLY ALC_ � 4NYAN-QJfuWINTERL11N1 CIPROJECT LOCA. WILL MAPLL C1 � tl( I sT _ �RA✓Af In_NC�L�–'CNI"YAG441"RO 1-aio vEJ SMFR:4R . I .TFC'. LR"f.T�1 PI This project involves the construction of additional athletic fields which include multi -use recreation fields, tennis courts, a "wet" Play area, a 10,000 -15,000 square foot community building, storage/maintenance facility and additional parking. Justification: The City Council identified this project as a goal for FY2007-08. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $159,230 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $159,230 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction 50 $0 SO $0 $0 $5,580,000 $5,580,000 Inspection & Administration 5o So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $159,230 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,580,000 $5,739,230 Project funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 201617 201718 201819 TOTAL Park Development (120) $159,230 $0 $0 S0 5D $5,580,000 $5,739,230 Total Costs: $159,230 $0 $0 $0 SO $5,580,000 $5,739,230 Impact on Operations: Completion of this project will add a new facility to the City's inventory which will require operational extenditures for maintenance, staffing, overhead and L;`11t;es. li;itidl E]tlrnaZes pl.cv LIIC WSt O nldintdining two addiorial fieids at 5300,000 - $450,000 per year. J8 Project Number: A Key: 1779 Object: Fire District - Banyan Staton (175) Expansion J Project location: ' 11108 Banyan Street north side of Banyan Street I(_ � i• ROJECT LOCATION - —� CHAFFEY Est. Construction Start/End: COLLEGE To be determined GRIZZLY DR ; ` LOS OSOS HIGH SCHOOL.I.,_., Project Status: — Design pending - project on hold — — _� +I• ; - av Department: o'— Fire Fire Protection District R� Project Manager:i� perp Chief Mike Bell/Pamela Pane P1; I ' _ Description: Expansion of the existing facility to accommodate additional services operating out of that facility, primarily apparatus storage. Utilized for the Technical Rescue and Wildland Fire Response programs. Justification: The Banyan Station houses specialized service resources that are currently parked outside and subject to wear and tear from the elements. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 SO 50 $0 $O ' Contingency $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $O so $0 $0 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Fire Capital Projects (288) Prior Years $0 2014/15 $0 2015/16 SO 2016/17 $0 2017/18 $0 TBD $2,500,000 TOTAL $2,500,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 Impact on Operations: No additional personnel costs. Slightly square footage. increased operations and maintenance costs for utilities due to increased 19 1 1 1 1 Project Location: Within the boundary of south of Base line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard, east of Haven Avenue and west of Milliken Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status: Choose New Location and aquire property ' Department: Fire Protection District Project Manager: Chief Mike Bell/Pamela Pane Project Number: JL Key: 1645 Object: Fire District - Central Station (178) \l771 ASE LWF—RD i it'-= ij i! I� j iii• % /%/�LU ,V•.�..., n PROJECT LU LOCATIO LU U1� _ ;9THILL BLVD. CITY HALL Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital Projects (288) $o $o $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000 $8,000,000 Total Costs: $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000 $8,000,000 Impact on Operations: Annual station operations and maintenance costs will depend on the station size and staffing costs at the time of construction. Designs with greater active/passive energy conservation and greater xeriscape will cost less to operate. Capital equipment purchase of an engine. 1 10 Description: New Fire Station construction. New property for this station is being identified. Justification: New Fire Station was recommended in the Fire District's 2005 Strategic Plan. This station community, providing the area with emergency services for fire suppression and life safety. will serve the center of the Rancho Cucamonga Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL ' Environmental/NPDES $0 Design/Plan Review $0 Right -of -Way $o Construction $0 Inspection & Administration $0 Contingency $0 $0 SO SO SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $o $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $o $8,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $8,000,000 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $0 so $o $o $8,000,000 $8,000,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital Projects (288) $o $o $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000 $8,000,000 Total Costs: $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000 $8,000,000 Impact on Operations: Annual station operations and maintenance costs will depend on the station size and staffing costs at the time of construction. Designs with greater active/passive energy conservation and greater xeriscape will cost less to operate. Capital equipment purchase of an engine. 1 10 L h- 11 1 1 Project Location: Northwest corner of Civic Center Drive and Utica Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status: On Hold Department: Fire Protection District Project Manager: Chief Mike Bell/Pamela Pane Project Number: JL Key: 1392 Object: Fire District - Operations/Dispatch Building 8 UNAPARRAL WAY ===CIVIC-CEN.TER7DR ' PROJECT LOCATIO i l� ,f SA 7R Description: This project will construct a building to house Fire District Headquarters personnel and a possible dispatch center. rE Justification: Fire District Administration personnel have outgrown the current area in the Civic Center building. A new facility was recommended in the 2005 Strategic Plan to consolidate Fire Administration functions. There may be a future need to add a dispatch center. tProject Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review 50 50 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Right -of -Way $0 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 SO $0 $0 50 50 Contingency 50 50 50 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 $11,000,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital Projects (288) $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 $11,000,000 Total Costs: $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 $11,000,000 Impact on Operations: Fire District operations and maintenance costs will increasae with increased square footage, but will be unknown until final design is complete. G Project Number: JL Key: 1189 Object: Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road - Widening with Median Island including Landscaped Median to Vineyard Avenue Project Location: Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road, including landscaped median to Vineyard Avenue Project Manager: Curt Billings ,t IL. Y4 VIA-t.IL"EFZ.7E ��II I �_ tl"'w_amJL ILL COUNTRY C �UB\`~ J4JVlI I �1✓ m l — I tit ;? T C=0 '' I.- ZrL Lu \ C<w� J � > 1 �` I • SAN:.' R. FAMILY SPORTS CENTER cL alr. IWLILRNA-R11 h i CID 0 0 W A� jtii� I W r� c BEAR GULCH) rl W ELEMENTA 5 KONGC.1 PR��ECT L:OC,�►TI®N BEAR C,UL on P.'ARK: W LLID EE m — IARR01Y;F2TE � II i � Z ' Est. Construction Start/End: ' To be determined project is Project Status: Project Cost Estimate ($): Design Prior Years 2014/15 Department: TOTAL $0 $3,126,000 $854,000 $13,943,000 $613,000 51,689,000 Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings ,t IL. Y4 VIA-t.IL"EFZ.7E ��II I �_ tl"'w_amJL ILL COUNTRY C �UB\`~ J4JVlI I �1✓ m l — I tit ;? T C=0 '' I.- ZrL Lu \ C<w� J � > 1 �` I • SAN:.' R. FAMILY SPORTS CENTER cL alr. IWLILRNA-R11 h i CID 0 0 W A� jtii� I W r� c BEAR GULCH) rl W ELEMENTA 5 KONGC.1 PR��ECT L:OC,�►TI®N BEAR C,UL on P.'ARK: W LLID EE m — IARR01Y;F2TE � II i � Z ' Description: This project is the last phase of the multi phased Foothill Boulevard street and bridge improvements and includes right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, street widening, storm drain and landscape improvements, including arches at both the west and east City limits. ' Justification: This project will provide increased traffic and pedestrian circulation including safety and visual enhancements. The identified in the City's General Plan, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and has been marked as a City Council goal. project is Project Cost Estimate ($): Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD --- Environmental/NPDES $o $0 $0 $0 50 50 Design/Plan Review $3,096,000 $0 50 $0 50 $30,000 Right -of -Way $713,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $141,000 Construction 59,884,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,059,000 Inspection & Administration $613,000 50 $0 50 $0 $0 Contingency $1,289,000 $0 $0 $0 $o S400,000 TOTAL $0 $3,126,000 $854,000 $13,943,000 $613,000 51,689,000 2017/18 Total Costs: $15,595,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,630,000 $20,225,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL RDA - 2001 TAB (650) $3,504,000 $0 5o RDA -.200ATAB .(660) I $11,584,OCC 50 $0 $0 $3,504,000 Transportation Fund (124) $407,000 $0 �u S0 yu $0 $11,584,000" Unknown s0 $0 $0 $0 $407,000 Total Costs: $0 So $0 $0 50 54,630,000 $4,630,000 $15,595,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $4,630,000 $20,225,000 Impact on Operations: This project adds one mile of additional landscape maintenance costs along Foothill Boulevard, as well as additional street lights into SLD 1. some I J13 J it r_ 0 Project Location: 9612 San Bernardino Road Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status: Purchase of a proposed site in progress Department: Fire Protection District Project Manager: Chief Mike Bell/Pamela Pane Project Number: 1L Key: 1733 Object: Fire District - San Bernardino Station (172) Relocation I--F[-F�c-Er a�-- :If.,N:, —PROJECT LOC I -- a .: s. W rttcsr.� l I° i21 !.ENTAIL -. l- I - _LEMEN7AI i _ ' T.O. 1 I IOHU �flREj s• 11 --_ I jI Iz , I i FOOTHILL BLVD Description: New Fire Station construction at a new location. New property for this station has been identified and negotiation in progress. Justification: Rebuilding and possibly relocating this 55 -year old Fire Station was recommended in the Fire District's 2005 Strategic Plan. This station serves the southwestern portion of the Rancho Cucamonga community, providing the area with emergency services for fire suppression and life safety. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES Design/Plan Review Right -of -Way Construction Inspection & Administration Contingency so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 so $0 $0 $o $0 s0 $0 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 so SO $500,000 $0 $6,000,000 So SO $0 $500,000 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $o So $0 $o $6,500,000 $6,500,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 L _ 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital Projects (288) $0 $0 $0 So $0 56,500,000 $6,500,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $6,500,000 $6,500,000 Impact on Operations: No additional personnel costs - current San Bernardino Station personnel will move to the new station when complete. Larger station design could create an increase in maintenance costs, but greater efficiency in station equipment could make it a wash. J12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I Project Number: 800-2013-15 JL Key: 1829 Object: Haven Avenue from Wilson Avenue to Vivienda Street - Community Trail on the west side Project Location: West side of Haven Avenue From Wilson Avenue to Vivienda Street Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Description: Justification: ST s VI$TAGROi .E:S"T UJI ;`�1I UL-CJE: PROJECT LOCATION �= jvIENJ s� N (� CJA-CARANDA C.r WI r (LU HILL -SIDE -RQ a a _¢ C rX0NAC0=PL ran rEitF iiRG_'�Sv C i PRI UF'i r jai QBE F>QP i Z Ta—�HERMOSA r Ef IEraENTARY X a. m ( J Q ) NOR -Ty. RIDGE-0fw —MAH'O'Gt14VY_4:Ti a SAt?DL-El,:tl�lti�T.E.R��tT_ `�1 z yMANZANi.TA.DRv-�J �'� �� 6V NDD > CHAFFEY I � VERN Y.00D:C.TC �\ �i COLLEGE Construction of an equestrian trail on the west side of Haven Avenue. Project includes the installation of a two rail PVC fence, decomposed granite, and mow curbs. This project will connect to the existing community trail at the west side of Haven Avenue and is part of the trail master plan. It will also improve the appearance of the west side of Haven Avenue. Project Cost Estimate (5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $2,500 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $2,500 Right -of -Way $o $0 $o $0 $o $o $o Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $112,000 $112,000 Inspection & Administration $0 50 $0 $0 50 $2,000 $2,000 Contingency 50 $0 $0 $o $0 $11,000 $11,000 Total Costs: $2,500 $0 50 $o $0 $125,000 $127,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Beautification Fund (110) $2,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500 Unknown $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 $125,000 Total Costs: $, ��� $Ci": $u ;125,000 $127,SG0 Impact on Operations: This project will add an additional quarter mile to the City's trail inventory, requiring abatement, and routine maintenance. trash removal, weed J14 1 1 I I I I I Project Number: 800-2012-28 JL Key: 1810 Object: Hermosa Avenue from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson Avenue - Storm Drain Improvements Project Location: Hermosa Avenue from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 4/2016 - 9/2016 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Description: Justification: J—� ALTA LOMA BASIN is CHAFFEY I COLLEGE ALTA !OMA BASIN f rtSE� � ATION�. a' P Construct a master planned storm drain, install mainline, catch basins and manholes. The entire street from the Alta Basin to Wilson Avenue will be resurfaced upon completion (see Hermosa rehabilitation project JL 1815). This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life, use, and rideability. Also, during rain events it will provide improved pedestrian access to the Hermosa Intermediate School at Wilson Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 5o $0 50 5o $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $10,000 $0 So $0 $0 50 $10,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $0 51,900,000 Inspection & Administration 5o $0 $45,000 $0 50 $0 $45,000 Contingency $0 $0 5300,000 $0 $0 50 5300,000 I Otal Losts: 510,000 50 $2,245,000 $0 $0 50 $2,255,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Drainage General Fund (112) $10,000 $o 5o $0 $0 So $10,000 Unknown $0 $0 $2,245,000 $o $0 $0 52,245,000 Total Costs: ;C _ .. _.2.245,000 SO <0 $0 $2,255,000 Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and a reduction of street repair maintenace costs for pothole and crack repairs, thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas. J15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Project Number: 800-2011-08 A Key: 1791 Object: Lemon Avenue from Haven Avenue to 1,300 feet west - Storm Drain Improvements Project Location: Lemon Avenue from Haven Avenue to 1300 feet west. Est. Construction Start/End: 4/2018 - 9/2018 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings I' ? Q C I tucrLU Lu ~i Z raj n Q > Q C , X y -J J� z z cr Y ANCE ST C• _ Q' G :JFiANC J z i > sFiIS.rS1� DR_Y Q_,f t fail .]UL Ott PROD CY LOCATION w �Q {� VINEYARD SaraEttsc r ON/�r�� _ W o° v JUNIOR HIGH m = Q g F;IC;HLANL7.AVIE F:NCHAVE 2 C Description: Construct a master planned storm drain, install mainline, catch basins and manholes. The entire street from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue will be resurfaced upon completion (see Lemon rehabilitation project 1793). Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life, use, and rideability. Also, during rain events it will provide improved pedestrian access. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 So Design/Plan Review $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $2,000 Right -of -Way $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction so 50 $0 so $1,520,000 $0 $1,520,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $o $o $o $10,000 $0 $10,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 $0 $170,000 Total Costs: $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,700,000 $0 $1,702,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Drainage General Fund (112) $2,000 $0 so $0 $0 $0 $2,000 Unknown $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,700,000 $0 $1,700,000 Total Costs: $2,000;0 $C 10 $a,70D,OGfi 0 $1,702,000 Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and a reduction of street repair maintenace costs for pothole and crack repairs, thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas. J16 1 Project Number: 800-2014-11 JL Key: 1888 Object: Miller Avenue at East Avenue - Traffic Signal Installation Project Location: Miller Avenue at East Avenue and East Avenue. Est. Construction Start/End: ' To be determined Justification: The installation Project Status: Design Department: Project Cost Estimate (S': Expenditure/Category Engineering Project Manager: Jason Welday Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, installation of traffic signals and related equipment at Miller Avenue and East Avenue. ' Justification: The installation of traffic signals will improve traffic safety and reduce traffic congestion. Project Cost Estimate (S': Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 50 $o $0 50 1 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,500 512,500 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $250,000 $250,000 Inspection & Administration 50 $o 50 So $o $12,500 512,500 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 1 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $300,000 $300,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Transportation (124) $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 Total Costs: so$0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance. The estimated cost Imaintenance for a traffic signal is $2,500 per year. of electricity and J17 0 [I u Job Number: 1L Key: 1775 Object: Pacific Electric Trail Enhancements - West to East City Limits Project Location: Pacific Electric Trail from West City Limits to East City Limits Ci i Project Manager: Walt Stickney Description: This project includes the addition of various amenities along the trail. These amenities consist of replacing plaques and installing other trail improvements such as truncated domes at wheel chair ramps. Justification: The trail from the west to east end was constructed in different phases, at different times, and by different contractors. Issues have come up during the course of the last couple years by users of the trail that has prompted the need for this enhancement. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 Est. Construction Start/End: 2016/17 To be determined TBD Project Status: ' Design 50 Department: 50 Engineering Ci i Project Manager: Walt Stickney Description: This project includes the addition of various amenities along the trail. These amenities consist of replacing plaques and installing other trail improvements such as truncated domes at wheel chair ramps. Justification: The trail from the west to east end was constructed in different phases, at different times, and by different contractors. Issues have come up during the course of the last couple years by users of the trail that has prompted the need for this enhancement. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES So 50 $0 50 $0 50 so Design/Plan Review so s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right -of -Way $o so 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $o so 50 so $0 $110,000 $110,000 Inspection & Administration $0 So $0 $0 $0 So so Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 50 50 50 Total Costs: $0 so $0 so so $110,000 $110,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Beautification (110) 50 5o so s0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 City-wide Infrastructure Imp (198) $0 $0 50 So 50 $100,000 $100,000 Total Costs: 50 s0 $0 s0 50 $110,000 $110,000 Impact on Operations: Minimal impart on opprat nns. 1 18 1 Project Location: 7484 Vineyard Avenue ' Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined 1 1 F�� Engineering Project Manager: Walt Stickney Project Number: JL Key: 1621 Object: Red Hill Park - Pedestrian Paseo Description: Construction of a concrete sidewalk and lights in the south west corner between Red Hill Park and Carnelian Avenue. Justification: Adds a pedestrian access to Red Hill Park from Carnelian Avenue Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Project Status: ' Design 201617 Department: ' TOTAL 1 1 F�� Engineering Project Manager: Walt Stickney Project Number: JL Key: 1621 Object: Red Hill Park - Pedestrian Paseo Description: Construction of a concrete sidewalk and lights in the south west corner between Red Hill Park and Carnelian Avenue. Justification: Adds a pedestrian access to Red Hill Park from Carnelian Avenue Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 201415 201516 201617 201718 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 $o $o $o $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $90,000 $90,000 Inspection & Administration Contingency $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $O $10,000 Total Costs: 515,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $115,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL PD -85 Redemption (848) $15,000 50 $0 50 $0 $100,000 $115,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $115,000 Impact on Operations: Minor impact. 1 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I Project Number: 800-2013-28 1L Key: 1842 Object: Safety Lighting - Upgrades at Various Intersections Project Location: Foothill Boulevard at the intersections of Vineyard Avenue, Archibald Avenue, and Haven Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Jason Welday Description: Q AI1 � � IRnNWOI)rl ST I :iEla.S�� '/ 4;/,'' .• II �=J ``II ¢ �K y'.�7 �`� lj c., 1 •� .�l L BAL'1A-SI Il(� Q _}4 lam' IGo�JAMER �I^� :FW saC!1UM DOOLE l._, <^C. L IW [ice[' C Q� MENT. IIIII���I �f 2 \ _JJL�� S 2 I I If.I1AN.RpY ST !.: �G C"��• " �--^ �JI� y�W aK,.,CF,IU RC�S7AE�LJ I..I�_f `. CNVR G/T. $ I/Q.% J• ��--ILS S �JLpJCr•� I! NUTI.T -�� 1� I(�I—I(—jr—i=1 MIIRG. T Z -j �1 LAN[:StiN Sy LT N(:ST�N:Si � LIpNGS.TOPtSTI Ir jI I1 I I I \'•y I� .�'� j^¢ > II Z�LIP I G I f,ASLU142 `�t 1 = 1L ;• ' I rsnr Ru:sl_'�Q Z ._2 2=T1' .V ti.r� °���� LL� I?RWItKS :=a / `' �i' c -3i= \• j II 'ii ' I rEW.FN:s r ---i a 3 4=.'a,��-.IL f•�IGEN TP. — FrI� i! EMENTII EL _ 31 FNAF(J!NfL'•i']–�.__�� n �,I FArMORD-S.T.-`II_F..IRE-S.TA TIOMILY SP(NjTS CENTER LE7AC:a'�iJ PROJECT L CATION I l ctTr � � I �� i I !( I•_�',- RC POLICE 5T r Z C I'-`.. .(171171 t F a^6 •v' Ii .rCl'R`•:L-5.••, {CNIG !7E R(iVL"Mil �Ii' 2 "EN7ER:D ?L'A'ER: T Q Z i ELM }I a �I J•_..�_�___�K'3NO•.TI'ST ;I I II ' t;�—FRI4iNLST—= LL-LBERRF EARLY I w :1 BEAR GUL IPPA -'R KK= -3-f ` Ilr lj a u x CPE^IALED rP I�J�LJI'CAL'LC-':CJAH '-"JL^ Iii - -A^-FAMILY-6E59URCE-CENiER= ISL 1i T. n� � S�iRK L'IN� G pq iyd+I The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, installing additional safety lighting at existing signalized intersections. Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by enhancing the visibility at the intersection. Project Cost Estimate (5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 201516 201617 201718 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES Design/Plan Review $0 $0 So so so $0 so $0 5o so $0 $3,000 50 $3,000 Right -of -Way Construction s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $o s0 $130,000 SO $130,000 Inspection & Administration Contingency $0 50 $0 so So $0 So $0 so $0 $4,000 513,000 $4,000 513,000 Total Costs: $0 so s0 so so $150,000 $150,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Transportation (124) Prior Years s0 201415 $0 201516 $0 201617 so 201718 —� $0 TBD 5150,000 TOTAL $150,000 Total Costs: s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 Impact on Operations: The project will increase the cost for every 5 years. electrical service, and maintenance to replace lamps will occur approximately J 20 0 Project Number: JL Key: Object: Upper Cucamonga Storm Drain Phase III - East of Hellman Avenue to Base Line Road to Roberds, North on Amethvst Street to 19th Street and Easterly 300 feet ' >',FJRE�Ti4T19N AGAR. FN:S.T 111 PROJECT LOCATI01d n � IIV F� C -7' I( II I� -�7II �jpI"t rnV_Ar.Yt: a IL" TON:ST'a L=HAr.11LtL'V:S.7�^�_ �� t1tUGIF �)(1q RF Z �• M1_�fZ� � rdtLNrJNE.r_r4s �c A RYL. 1i SIT L -D R�j/ I Qr1l, CCY-S:t_K I1'.'i�-JU cc 1�GIG"•l7r a1 "II - Vic* 1�A'CON:S.7 AVAL-:lN=$ �u; rn Au-,- Xc.r r'fA"YF., V[pTAST _ I I T GNTE-VISTA=ST' _ RGNE.STJIV� � Z .F "GT I�l I� �VV �C'IF1'iT .57 �At E U L'A_V.:NE:ST r .II i �^ iA VINE�9T ll_ n n I I vlvt_S.T�A1TA LOtdA �) U r, LA:RONDA:ST ' ARNELIAN �� MENTA AIX:ST- .. t- I Ij LA:GPANDE=S. II EL MENTAIRY a LA GRANDE ST U. � I L-:: ALTA LOMA `f•-' f+' I--� th11SA:OR L L•(iMil A . T a r LIIM.yjrjI a J a LONMA II.7ADR HIGH I�I I p aJ a a a a .-A:ratsa:ortcc H013EV Us � F �a��L_. -�lJ O SCT U w �ALINE w _ 'a nL10,NSPARK �Q:' n Z Z n Project Location: Construct a Master Plan Storm Drain, install catch basins and manholes. In addition, Amethyst Street will be widened with curb and East of Hellman Avenue along the north side of the Pacific Electric Trail, along Base Line Road to Roberds Street, north in Amethyst Justification: Street to 19th Street and easterly 300 feet. pedestrian access along Amethyst Street which serves Alta Loma Elementary School. In addition, a FEMA Flood Zone Letter of Map Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status: insurance. requiring additional flood Construction Project Cost Estimate Department: Engineering Project Manager: Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016 17 —L 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Romeo David ' >',FJRE�Ti4T19N AGAR. FN:S.T 111 PROJECT LOCATI01d n � IIV F� C -7' I( II I� -�7II �jpI"t rnV_Ar.Yt: a IL" TON:ST'a L=HAr.11LtL'V:S.7�^�_ �� t1tUGIF �)(1q RF Z �• M1_�fZ� � rdtLNrJNE.r_r4s �c A RYL. 1i SIT L -D R�j/ I Qr1l, CCY-S:t_K I1'.'i�-JU cc 1�GIG"•l7r a1 "II - Vic* 1�A'CON:S.7 AVAL-:lN=$ �u; rn Au-,- Xc.r r'fA"YF., V[pTAST _ I I T GNTE-VISTA=ST' _ RGNE.STJIV� � Z .F "GT I�l I� �VV �C'IF1'iT .57 �At E U L'A_V.:NE:ST r .II i �^ iA VINE�9T ll_ n n I I vlvt_S.T�A1TA LOtdA �) U r, LA:RONDA:ST ' ARNELIAN �� MENTA AIX:ST- .. t- I Ij LA:GPANDE=S. II EL MENTAIRY a LA GRANDE ST U. � I L-:: ALTA LOMA `f•-' f+' I--� th11SA:OR L L•(iMil A . T a r LIIM.yjrjI a J a LONMA II.7ADR HIGH I�I I p aJ a a a a .-A:ratsa:ortcc H013EV Us � F �a��L_. -�lJ O SCT U w �ALINE w _ 'a nL10,NSPARK �Q:' n Z Z n I J21 Description: Construct a Master Plan Storm Drain, install catch basins and manholes. In addition, Amethyst Street will be widened with curb and gutter and sidewalks where necessary. All the streets within the storm drain limits will be resurfaced upon completion. Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life, use, and rideability. Also, during rain events it will provide improved pedestrian access along Amethyst Street which serves Alta Loma Elementary School. In addition, a FEMA Flood Zone Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) will be processed after completion removing the properties around the area from Zone A insurance. requiring additional flood Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016 17 —L 2017/18 TBD TOTAL ' Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 s0 Design/Plan Review $O $0 $0 5o 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO Right -of -Way $o $o $o 50 50 Construction $o $o $0 50 $0 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 S0 50 $o $o $o $o $o Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 Total Costs: $0 $o 50 50 $0 $3,900,000 $3,900,000 fProject Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD Unknown TOTAL $0 Total Costs: $0 50 $0 $0 $3,900,000 $3,900,000 $0 $0 <0 $0 s0 53.900,000 $3,900,000 Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and reduction of street repair maintenace costs for pothole and crack repairs, thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas. I J21 General Improvement Program BEAUTIFICATION Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-24 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action r Type o d U General Plan Policy d d 3 O y T L 7 � 0 >, V 0 O O rT+ °7 Implementation Action(s) E a y o O ° O. C 7 d 3 C Implement the Bicycle Plan pursuant to Figure CM -6. Update the City's Bicycle Circulation Plan in a format suitable for obtaining public funding. Develop the planning, implementation, and design details of the bicycle facility and amenity elements of the Community Mobility Chapter, including the setting of implementation priorities and the identification of both capital and operating funding sources. Implementation should focus on adding a north -south trail along either Deer Creek or Cucamonga Creek as a first priority. Update the City's Trails Implementation Plan to maintain consistency A, D, with the General Plan. ENG PL E, F, 1 4 Review City ordinances to ensure that an adequate mechanism exists to manage the use of trails only by authorized categories of users. Implementation of the Bicycle Plan may require traffic signalization at the crossing of bike paths with arterial roadways to facilitate the safe crossing of those arterials by bicyclists and pedestrians. Signals should be convenient to bicyclists with accessible push -buttons to activate the signal. Provide traffic control push button devices at convenient locations for bicyclists at signalized intersections on the identified Bicycle Network. CM -3.8 O O Continue to encourage the provision of bicycle facilities, such as bicycle lockers and secure bike parking, throughout the City. Identify existing locations where bicycle lockers and secure bicycle parking could be provided at key locations throughout put the City, and develop a funding and implementation plan. Encourage/require the provision of bicycle lockers and secure bike parking for major development projects, as defined in the Development PL ENG A, D' 4 Code. E, F, H Modify the Development Code to require provision of bicycle parking spaces, bicycle lockers, and, as appropriate, showers for bicycle riders at new buildings providing significant employment, at transit stations, in the commercial districts, and at recreational destinations in the City. Identify and implement a dedicated funding source for CM -3.9 O implementation and completion of the Bicycle Network as identified in the Bicycle Plan. Same action as identified for CM -3.7. ENG E, F 4 CM- O Continue to complete the installation of sidewalks and require new 3.10 development to provide sidewalks. Use the CIP to identify a schedule for installing new and replacement sidewalks throughout the City, placing priority on installing missing ENG B' C, 4 sidewalks near schools and activity centers, and replacing sidewalks that D, have been identified as hazardous to public safety. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-24 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A N-25 Action T pe m General Plan Policy W 3 �, > o T +- - 0 Q' f6 +. C N y 2' C 7 O cn > U @ T i y C O O CM C w c d Implementation Action(s) E 'C a a Q N ` o O IL a. Q cn a 7 0 (1) W 3 LL C a CM- Continue to provide pedestrian amenities on sidewalks on major O streets that are key pedestrian routes, including the provision of 3.11 benches, shade trees, and trash cans. Identify key pedestrian travel corridors citywide, and prepare a Citywide Pedestrian Circulation Study to determine pedestrian amenity needs, capital and operating funding sources, and a phased implementation program. Develop a program for gradually installing public amenities A B such as streetlights, benches, trash containers, art, drinking fountains, ENG PL C D 5 landscaping, etc. that will enhance the pedestrian environment and encourage increased use of transit. Use both the CIP process and other funding sources, including a program whereby businesses or residents may sponsor street furniture and/or landscaped areas. CM- Continue to require that the siting and architectural design of new 3.12 O development promote safety, pedestrian -friendly design, and access to transit facilities. Develop standards to be applied to development projects along transit PL ENG 1 4 corridors that require transit and pedestrian accessibility. Establish a number of bike hubs in the City (centralized locations CM- O with convenient bike parking for trip destinations or transfer to 3.13 other transportation modes), at key transit nodes, and at commercial nodes. Conduct a study to determine the best locations for bike hubs in the City, and develop a plan, wayfinding program, and implementation process for ENG PL, RD A, B' 4 providing bike hubs that provide secure bicycle lockers, bike racks, and C, D connections to transit at key locations in the City. CM- O Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access to local and regional 3.14 transit, including facilitating connections to transit. Same action as identified for CM -3.7. ENG PL 1 4 CM- Coordinate the provision of the non -motorized networks (bicycle 3.15 O and pedestrian) with adjacent jurisdictions to maximize sub - regional connectivity. Same action as identified for CM -3.7. ENG PL A, E, F 4 CM- O Establish fixed -route local circulator bus service connecting major 3.16 activity centers. Explore development of a fixed -route local circulator bus system, station ENG PL A, E, H 5 location, and funding mechanisms. Continue to implement traffic management and traffic signal CM -4.1 O operations measures along the arterial roadway to minimize delay and congestion for all modes, without adversely impacting transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A N-25 Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 CUC AM O N G A GENE RAL P L A N A-57 Action Ty pe 0, Uc General Plan Policy 3 Y o Q T u 2 O fn C > U °' aai Implementation Action(s) @ E O O a 0 c C Y o O a- a Q- cn i a 7 d V) o: 3 U_ a PL, AS, A B Same actions as identified for RC -4.1 to RC -4.5. ENG ENG, CM, BS, C, E, 3 PW, FIN G, I Encourage development of transit -oriented and infill development, PS -12.3 O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative transportation. Same action as identified for RC -4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3 Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure, and support PS -12.4 O public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the potential for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). Same action as identified for RC -4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3 Provide green building incentives, assess green building techniques as a formal stage of project review, and develop a green PS -12.5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and existing buildings. Adaptation strategies will also include increased water efficiency in buildings. Same actions as identified for RC -6.1 to RC -6.4 PL BNG A, I, K 4 Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re -use and PS -12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers. Same action as identified for PF -7.1. ENG PL A 3 PS -12.7 O O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native and drought -resistant planting), and preservation of open space. Same actions as identified for RC -1.1, RC -8.1 to RC -8.7. PL ENG, N' PW A, 1 4 PS -12.8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in City operations and maintenance. Same actions as identified for RC -5.1 to RC -5.3. AS CM, FIN, A, B, C, 4 PW E, K Develop energy- or climate change -themed publications and workshops, facilitating energy audits for residents, and establishing PS -12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Same action as identified for RC -5.1. CM ENG A, K 4 Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific PS -13.1 O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour map depicting future noise levels (Figure PS -10) should be used by the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility. Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 CUC AM O N G A GENE RAL P L A N A-57 DRAINAGE Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 C U C A MM 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A N A-23 Action w Type Q U General Plan Policy N0 3 C w ~- i_ W cn d C C U W d Implementation Action(s) E O O a s o o a — = W a a cn a cn W u- a Explore the Feasibility of Extending Local Transit Service Explore the possibility of extending to adjacent jurisdictions in cooperation with such jurisdictions who could also participate in funding, if beneficial to the City. Work with Regional Transit Operators (Omnitrans) Develop the optimum coordination and integration of bus transit services between the local City circulator system and the regional service. Consult with Omnitrans to establish and maintain transit hubs at O Victoria Gardens, Chaffey College, the Metrolink Station, and other CM -3.4 locations as appropriate to facilitate use of transit and transfers between transit services. Same action as identified for CM -3.1. ENG PL A 4 Consider and evaluate the possible relocation of the Metrolink CM -3.5 O Station to Haven Avenue to provide improved connections to transit and to support planned transit -oriented land uses along Haven Avenue. Work with Metrolink and Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) to study the feasibility of moving the Metrolink Station from its ENG, current location to Haven Avenue. Explore options for alternative funding PL RD E, F 6 from sources other than the General Fund, such as grants, and specifically grants that promote transit -oriented development. In addition to requiring private development to provide transit amenities, consult with regional transit operators to provide CM -3.6 O attractive and convenient bus stops, including shade/weather protection, seats, transit information, and bus shelters as appropriate. Same action as identified for CM -3.1. Also, develop a program, with identified funding sources, for providing amenities at bus stops in the ENG PL D 4 City. Continue to develop and maintain a citywide bicycle network of off- street bike paths, on -street bike lanes, and bike streets to provide CM -3.7 O O connections between neighborhoods, schools, parks, civic center/facilities, recreational facilities, and major commercial centers. Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 C U C A MM 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A N A-23 Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-24 RANCHO C U C A M 0 N G A GENERAL PLAN Action w Type > U General Plan Policy O 3 d (6 O Q �- 7 d d •= d 07 O (n > UO N O � += oai a Implementation Action(s) E Q 0 o o a Z :3 m c Implement the Bicycle Plan pursuant to Figure CM -6. Update the City's Bicycle Circulation Plan in a format suitable for obtaining public funding. Develop the planning, implementation, and design details of the bicycle facility and amenity elements of the Community Mobility Chapter, including the setting of implementation priorities and the identification of both capital and operating funding sources. Implementation should focus on adding a north -south trail along either Deer Creek or Cucamonga Creek as a first priority. Update the City's Trails Implementation Plan to maintain consistency A, D, with the General Plan. ENG PL E, F, 1 4 Review City ordinances to ensure that an adequate mechanism exists to manage the use of trails only by authorized categories of users. Implementation of the Bicycle Plan may require traffic signalization at the crossing of bike paths with arterial roadways to facilitate the safe crossing of those arterials by bicyclists and pedestrians. Signals should be convenient to bicyclists with accessible push -buttons to activate the signal. Provide traffic control push button devices at convenient locations for bicyclists at signalized intersections on the identified Bicycle Network. CM -3.8 O O Continue to encourage the provision of bicycle facilities, such as bicycle lockers and secure bike parking, throughout the City. Identify existing locations where bicycle lockers and secure bicycle parking could be provided at key locations throughout put the City, and develop a funding and implementation plan. Encourage/require the provision of bicycle lockers and secure bike parking for major development projects, as defined in the Development PL ENG A' D' 4 Code. E, F, H Modify the Development Code to require provision of bicycle parking spaces, bicycle lockers, and, as appropriate, showers for bicycle riders at new buildings providing significant employment, at transit stations, in the commercial districts, and at recreational destinations in the City. Identify and implement a dedicated funding source for CM -3.9 O implementation and completion of the Bicycle Network as identified in the Bicycle Plan. Same action as identified for CM -3.7. ENG E, F 4 CM- O Continue to complete the installation of sidewalks and require new 3.10 development to provide sidewalks. Use the CIP to identify a schedule for installing new and replacement sidewalks throughout the City, placing priority on installing missing ENG B, C, 4 sidewalks near schools and activity centers, and replacing sidewalks that D, have been identified as hazardous to public safety. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-24 RANCHO C U C A M 0 N G A GENERAL PLAN Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-26 R A N C N 0 CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL P L A N Action Type Z > U General Plan Policy o 6�7 ' C y T _= u 3 0 d j d Q' + C d Q' p) C •- O Cf) W ,,. T i= C 07 C �+ U d ° UImplementation Action(s) a C o o a- n. a cn c a- Z d v) W u. 1 a Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM -4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM -4.1. ENG A, D 3 CM -4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM -4.1. ENG PW E; �, 3 Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM -4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A, D, 4 and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM -5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development, including non -automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM -5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non -automobile solutions, prior to, or concurrent with, project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4 provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks, trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-26 R A N C N 0 CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL P L A N FACILITIES Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-30 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action w Ty pe Z d U General Plan Policy 3 O CL >, m y +, d 0 •- O O O C + UCL Action(s) E o a a y o IL ° a. cn c a. d cn M u_ a Expand recreation and cultural attractions to enhance ED -2.3 O tourism/visitor potential and to boost sales and transient occupancy tax. Develop brochures or links from the City's web site to showcase the various recreational and cultural venues to attract visitors to the City. Enhancement of cultural amenities, including regional entertainment RD CS A 7 options, recreation, and historic preservation, will help to embellish the City's reputation as a destination for a wide range of visitors. Expand lodging choices in the City through the recruitment and ED -2.4 O placement of full-service hotels that will complement the existing select -service hotel portfolio. Review and update marketing strategies (land surveys, infrastructure availability, and modes of transportation) to solicit the development of a RD PL A, G 4 full-service lodging facility. Make sure that zoning regulations can accommodate a full-service hotel at desired locations. ED -3.1 O O Continue to make public safety a priority. Use the annual budgeting process to allocate funding for public safety services, equipment, and facilities commensurate with the City's service CM PD, FD A 6 objectives. ED -3.2 O Provide community and cultural amenities. Same action as identified for ED -2.3. CS CM, RD A 4 ED -3.3 O Maintain a healthy fiscal balance. Use the annual budgeting process to check that revenues from all CM AS, FIN A, G 1 sources continue to more than match projected spending. ED -3.4 O O Improve internal circulation for all modes of transportation, consistent with the concept of "Complete Streets". Same action as identified for LU -3.1 to 3.8. ENG PL A, G' 4 ED -3.5 O Facilitate development of additional local and regional entertainment venues. Focus a special economic development team on the task of working towards attracting developers and investors interested in responding to RD PL A, G 6 local and regional demand for new entertainment options. ED -3.6 O Leverage the City's quality of life amenities to attract more knowledge-based workers. Expand the Economic Development Strategy to market Rancho Cucamonga's civic assets, including parks, recreation and community RD PL, CS A, G 4 enrichment facilities and programs, trails, and quality school districts. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-30 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-; 4 R A N C H O CUCAMONGA GEN E RAL P L A N Action w Type iE c, General Plan Policy c 3 O CL > �- C Cn W U R @ w C O O � a0i Implementation Action(s) S - Q Q � o 6 a. ° a. a U) 0- :; W cn CC Z u_ L a. RC -8.7 O O Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological, educational, and other scientific study purposes. Same action as identified for RC -8.3. PL ENG A. 1 4 PF -1.1 O Continue to implement high-quality standards for new public facilities and improvements to existing buildings. Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality architectural treatment and green building design in all new and PL ENG A, B, C 5 remodeled civic facilities. PF -1.2 O Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings, events, and celebrations. Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A, B, C 3 facilities to community groups. PF -1.3 O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers where they will serve populations with the greatest needs. Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as CS ENG, PL A 6 neighborhoods evolve. PF -1.4 O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their lifespan. Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for PW CS, LIB, A. B, C 4 existing public facilities. AC PF -1.5 O O Continue to incorporate low -maintenance features into public facilities consistent with the City's sustainability plan. Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part PW PL, CS, A, B. C 3 of the on-going maintenance program. BS PF -1.6 O Maintain multi -functional, flexible, and complementary space at community facilities. Same action as identified for PF -1.2. CS PW A, B. C 3 Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit organizations, school districts, and community organizations. Look PF -1.7 O for opportunities to create joint -use community space at facilities owned by private organizations such as faith -based groups and service clubs. Same action as identified for CS -2.5. CS A 4 Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of PF -2.1 O O joint -use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities, to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and education. Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater CS SD A, K 5 optimization of school facilities to service the entire community. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-; 4 R A N C H O CUCAMONGA GEN E RAL P L A N MISCELLANEOUS Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H O CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN 19 Action Type s U Plan Policy V) C N c W 3General d > R O _ 7 0 0 T U R O O C +' U .o U Implementation Action(s) E a s ° `o o a L a a to - d = m cn X U- a - Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City, to O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of CM -1.1 Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho Cucamonga. ■ Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. ■ Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, 1 7 ■ Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. ■ Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. ■ Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. ■ Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock. ■ Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange. ■ Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street. 1-0 Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for CM -1.2 convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM -2.1 and CM -3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM -1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM -2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, 1 4 funding. CM -1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. A, E. Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and ENG CS F, H, I 4 adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H O CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN 19 Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-20 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action r Type W General Plan Policy 3 m > 2 CL ,d y a>i C C . o cn 0 0C > U °' ° v Implementation Action(s) E a C c o o CL a- a <n c a = a> cn W > LL L 0 - Implement Implement street design standards per this General Plan, except that modified standards may be applied where appropriate on CM -1.5 O arterial corridors relating to transit, bicycle facilities, sidewalks, and on -street parking to be context sensitive to adjacent land uses and districts, and to all roadway users, including transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Integrate into the CIP process the planning of modified standards for Foothill Boulevard to accommodate BRT and for other arterials as ENG PL A, D, 1 4 appropriate to reflect the bikeway plan and pedestrian improvements necessary to support Mixed Use districts. CM -1.6 O Pursue a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the BNSF Railway line. Grade separations currently exist at Haven and Milliken Avenues. Due to truck traffic associated with the southeast industrial area, the City ENG PL A, E, 1 4 supports creating a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the BNSF Railway line. CM -2.1 O O Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide. Implement the Bicycle Master Plan included in the Community Mobility Chapter. Require that pedestrian facilities and connections be provided as part of all development projects, with an emphasis on connections within Mixed Use districts. Implement all bicycling and walking policies and Mobility ENG PL. RD A. D, 1 4 Element components. Preparation and distribute bike route maps and bike facilities information. Publish and make readily available pedestrian route maps and pedestrian facilities information. Encourage all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles CM -2.2 O traveled by automobiles, including enhanced transit access and land use approaches that provide compact and focused development along major transit corridors. Same actions as identified for LU -2.1, LU -5.4, LU -5.6, and CM -2.1. ENG PL A, D, 1 4 CM -2.3 O Support the use of hybrid, electric, and low/zero emission vehicles. Continue to maintain the Green Team Sustainability Action Matrix that identifies current and proposed efforts that procure vehicles that includes providing gas -efficient vehicles. CM PP\L,, AS, A, E, F 7 Amend the Development Code as appropriate to accommodate alternative fuel service stations and charging facilities. CM -2.4 O Replace City vehicles with energy-efficient and alternative fuel source models when replacing vehicles or adding to the City's fleet. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-20 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGAGENERAL PLAN A-23 Action Type U General Plan Policy V) i 3 C w 3 .O- N _ d O> s O fn A N O O M O w o Implementation Action(s) E a (( o o a o- a co IL a� cn Of u- a Explore the Feasibility of Extending Local Transit Service Explore the possibility of extending to adjacent jurisdictions in cooperation with such jurisdictions who could also participate in funding, if beneficial to the City. Work with Regional Transit Operators (Omnitrans) Develop the optimum coordination and integration of bus transit services between the local City circulator system and the regional service. Consult with Omnitrans to establish and maintain transit hubs at O Victoria Gardens, Chaffey College, the Metrolink Station, and other CM -3.4 locations as appropriate to facilitate use of transit and transfers between transit services. Same action as identified for CM -3.1. ENG PL A 4 Consider and evaluate the possible relocation of the Metrolink CM -3.5 O Station to Haven Avenue to provide improved connections to transit and to support planned transit -oriented land uses along Haven Avenue. Work with Metrolink and Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) to study the feasibility of moving the Metrolink Station from its ENG, current location to Haven Avenue. Explore options for alternative funding PL RD E, F 6 from sources other than the General Fund, such as grants, and specifically grants that promote transit -oriented development. In addition to requiring private development to provide transit amenities, consult with regional transit operators to provide CM -3.6 O attractive and convenient bus stops, including shade/weather protection, seats, transit information, and bus shelters as appropriate. Same action as identified for CM -3.1. Also, develop a program, with identified funding sources, for providing amenities at bus stops in the ENG PL D 4 City. Continue to develop and maintain a citywide bicycle network of off- street bike paths, on -street bike lanes, and bike streets to provide CM -3.7 O O connections between neighborhoods, schools, parks, civic center/facilities, recreational facilities, and major commercial centers. Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGAGENERAL PLAN A-23 Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-24 R A N C H O CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL P L A N Action r Ty e ;Q General Plan Policy N 3 u o T U I.L C NNd I.L C C W L tM C T d Implementation Action(s) E a C `o_ o a. ° 0. a rn c a. M d U) W M u_ a Implement the Bicycle Plan pursuant to Figure CM -6. Update the City's Bicycle Circulation Plan in a format suitable for obtaining public funding. Develop the planning, implementation, and design details of the bicycle facility and amenity elements of the Community Mobility Chapter, including the setting of implementation priorities and the identification of both capital and operating funding sources. Implementation should focus on adding a north -south trail along either Deer Creek or Cucamonga Creek as a first priority. Update the City's Trails Implementation Plan to maintain consistency A, D, with the General Plan. ENG PL E F 1 4 Review City ordinances to ensure that an adequate mechanism exists to manage the use of trails only by authorized categories of users. Implementation of the Bicycle Plan may require traffic signalization at the crossing of bike paths with arterial roadways to facilitate the safe crossing of those arterials by bicyclists and pedestrians. Signals should be convenient to bicyclists with accessible push -buttons to activate the signal. Provide traffic control push button devices at convenient locations for bicyclists at signalized intersections on the identified Bicycle Network. CM -3.8 O O Continue to encourage the provision of bicycle facilities, such as bicycle lockers and secure bike parking, throughout the City. Identify existing locations where bicycle lockers and secure bicycle parking could be provided at key locations throughout put the City, and develop a funding and implementation plan. Encourage/require the provision of bicycle lockers and secure bike parking for major development projects, as defined in the Development PL ENG A' D' 4 Code. E, F, H Modify the Development Code to require provision of bicycle parking spaces, bicycle lockers, and, as appropriate, showers for bicycle riders at new buildings providing significant employment, at transit stations, in the commercial districts, and at recreational destinations in the City. Identify and implement a dedicated funding source for CM -3.9 O implementation and completion of the Bicycle Network as identified in the Bicycle Plan. Same action as identified for CM -3.7. ENG E, F 4 CM- O Continue to complete the installation of sidewalks and require new 3.10 development to provide sidewalks. Use the CIP to identify a schedule for installing new and replacement sidewalks throughout the City, placing priority on installing missing ENG B, C, 4 sidewalks near schools and activity centers, and replacing sidewalks that D have been identified as hazardous to public safety. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-24 R A N C H O CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL P L A N Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-36 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL P L A N Action y Type General Plan Policy c3CD o CL T •= u o U) > f6 O O += o Implementation Action(s) E Q y r- o o a c = a Strategize with Foundation members to increase the range of CS A, H involvement in Foundation events. Provide a comprehensive, interconnected off-road trail system that CS -6.1 O provides alternative mobility choices throughout the entire City and increases connectivity. Continue to implement the principles of the Trails Implementation Plan. PL CS ENG A, 1 4 Connect trails in Rancho Cucamonga to trails in the San Bernardino CS -6.2 O National Forest and other hillside open space areas. These trails shall include trailheads with vehicle parking and other amenities. Coordinate with Federal and State agencies to facilitate funding and acquisition of trail connections from the City to the San Bernardino PL ENG A 5 National Forest. Connect new trails with the North Etiwanda Preserve. CS -6.3 O Continue to incorporate, where feasible, regional and community trails along utility corridors and drainage channels. Continue to make trail connections within the City on existing public- PL CS' A 5 agency owned properties. ENG Continue to maintain and pursue the development of planned trails CS -6.4 O and facilities for equestrian use within the Equestrian/Rural Area designation. Continue to ensure that trails accommodate equestrian users through E3 details outlined in the Trails Implementation Plan within north Alta Loma PL ENG C, 4 and Etiwanda. Improve existing trails by removing barriers, applying sustainability CS -6.5 O concepts, improving safety and function, and providing access to adjacent trails. Continue to program funding into the CIP for the improvements to ENG PL, BS A 4 deficient equestrian trails, as outlined in the Trails Implementation Plan. Require new development to provide access to adjacent trails and CS -6.6 O provide appropriate trail amenities (e.g., benches, drinking fountains, hitching posts, bike stands, and other amenities) for all new projects located adjacent to regional or community trails. Require new development projects adjacent to Regional or Community PL ENG A, K 4 Trails to provide access to and amenities for trails. CS -6.7 O Continue to credit publically accessible trailway acreage towards meeting parkland dedication standards. Continue to allow parkland credit for trails within development projects, PL ENG A, K 4 subject to adopted criteria. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-36 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL P L A N Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H O CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A 13 Action Ty pe 3 > U General Plan Policy c 3 w d = a) O fn U m O O c w d ° Implementation Action(s) = a C o o a 7 = a) 3 7 Develop a listing of acceptable fire-resistant plant types to be PL PW' ENG, A 3 incorporated into new and rehabilitated development sites. FD Encourage streetscape design and landscaping programs for LU -10.4 O commercial frontages that create vibrant places which support walking, bicycling, transit, and sustainable economic development. Same action as identified for LU -3.4. PL ENG, A 4 RD Consult with and coordinate with the Santa Fe Railway to develop LU -10.5 O and install a landscape plan for the enhancement of the railroad right-of-way. Inventory and assess the landscaping needs of the rail corridor, and PL ENG, A 6 consult with the rail agency to develop a plan. RD Continue to pursue strategies to reduce long-term operation and LU -10.6 O maintenance costs within the City's Landscape Maintenance Districts and other publicly funded areas. Inventory and prioritize the removal of turf areas within landscape medians to be replaced with plantings that reduce long-term operations PW ENG A 5 and maintenance costs. Continue to implement and update as necessary the City's Sign LU -11 A O O Ordinance in order to provide for a reasonable system of review and incentives for well-designed signs throughout the City. Establish a periodic review schedule of all City ordinances that govern aesthetics to determine if industry standards have changed or if other PL RD A, K 4 objectives are desirable that require amendments. Continue to require the undergrounding of utility lines and facilities LU -11.2 O O wherever feasible to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures. Require undergrounding of utilities for new development. Develop a A B strategy and prioritization list for the undergrounding utilities in developed ENG PL C 1 4 areas. LU -11.3 O O Require communication towers to be located and designed to blend with the surrounding environment. Review and update design guidelines for the siting and general appearance of communication towers to facilitate the least amount of PL A 4 visual intrusion. Emphasize use of stealth and architecturally integrated antenna. Ensure that streetscape design along roadways creates a strong LU -12.1 O landscaped edge, provides a coherent high-quality appearance along each route, and enhances the image of adjacent development. Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H O CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A 13 Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-57 Action Z, Type 3 a, U General Plan Policy N C d d ) IC Q w 3 d N O d m _ C O U U) O O 0 Implementation Action(s) E a N o O_ CL V) 0 fn Ix U_ O - PL, AS, A B Same actions as identified for RC -4.1 to RC -4.5. ENG ENG, CM, BS, C, E, 3 PW, FIN G, I Encourage development of transit -oriented and infill development, PS -12.3 O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative transportation. Same action as identified for RC -4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3 Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure, and support PS -12.4 O public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the potential for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). Same action as identified for RC -4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3 Provide green building incentives, assess green building techniques as a formal stage of project review, and develop a green PS -12.5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and existing buildings. Adaptation strategies will also include increased water efficiency in buildings. Same actions as identified for RC -6.1 to RC -6.4 PL BNG A, I, K 4 Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re -use and PS -12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers. Same action as identified for PF -7.1. ENG PL A 3 PS -12.7 O O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native and drought -resistant planting), and preservation of open space. Same actions as identified for RC -1.1, RC -8.1 to RC -8.7. PL PW ' A, 1 4 PS -12.8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in City operations and maintenance. Same actions as identified for RC -5.1 to RC -5.3. AS CM, FIN, A, B, C, 4 PW E, K Develop energy- or climate change -themed publications and workshops, facilitating energy audits for residents, and establishing PS -12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Same action as identified for RC -5.1. CM ENG A, K 4 Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific PS -13.1 O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour map depicting future noise levels (Figure PS -10) should be used by the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility. Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-57 MUNICIPAL UTILITY W RAr CUCAMONGI Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-44 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL P! A N Action Ty pe 72 d General Plan Policy c d 3 RC 0 �= 7 JT y =+ N 01 O O O °'Implementation Action(s) E a N o o a. ° a c- <n a 0 m cn Of 0 u- C a. RC -8.7 O O Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological, educational, and other scientific study purposes. Same action as identified for RC -8.3. PL ENG A, 1 4 PF -1.1 O Continue to implement high-quality standards for new public facilities and improvements to existing buildings. Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality CM architectural treatment and green building design in all new and PL ENG A, B, C 5 remodeled civic facilities. PF -1.2 O Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings, events, and celebrations. Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A, B, C 3 facilities to community groups. PF -1.3 O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers where they will serve populations with the greatest needs. Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as CS ENG, PL A 6 neighborhoods evolve. PF -1.4 O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their lifespan. Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for PW CS, LIB, A, B, C 4 existing public facilities. AC PF -1.5 O O Continue to incorporate low -maintenance features into public facilities consistent with the City's sustainability plan. Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part PW PL, CS, A, B, C 3 of the on-going maintenance program. BS PF -1.6 O Maintain multi -functional, flexible, and complementary space at community facilities. Same action as identified for PF -1.2. CS PW A, B, C 3 Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit organizations, school districts, and community organizations. Look PF -1.7 O for opportunities to create joint -use community space at facilities owned by private organizations such as faith -based groups and service clubs. Same action as identified for CS -2.5. CS A 4 Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of PF -2.1 O O joint -use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities, to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and education. Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater CS SD A, K 5 optimization of school facilities to service the entire community. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-44 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL P! A N Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-40 R A N C H 0 CUCA MONGA GENERAL P L A N Action Type U General Plan Policy y C 3 w t6 O N >+ _ 7 y y y M- O fn Q' T N � C M U o U Implementation Action(s) E a y o ao a- cn M cn W Li a.. Pursue efforts to reduce energy consumption through appropriate RC -4.1 O energy conservation and efficiency measures throughout all segments of the community. As it becomes economically practical, identify sources and replace A B imported, non-renewable energy resources with domestic renewable PL ENG, C, E, 5 energy sources such as solar and wind energy, recycled municipal solid CM G waste, and green waste. Promote the use of renewable energy and alternative energy technology, and support efforts to develop small-scale, distributed energy generation (e.g. solar, wind, cogeneration, and biomass) to RC -4.2 O reduce the amount of electricity drawn from the regional power grid and reduce the use of natural gas, while providing Rancho Cucamonga with a greater degree of energy and economic self- sufficiency. Provided that there would not be a decline in services to City residents or A B undue tax burden, use of energy efficiency and renewable energy ENG AS, CM, C, D, 6 resources will be employed for approving capital and operational PL E, G, I expenditures. RC -4.3 O Encourage the use of solar energy systems in homes and commercial businesses. Establish design criteria for active and passive solar applications within PL ENG, A 5 development proposals. BS Reduce operational energy requirements through sustainable and RC -4.4 O O complementary land use and circulation planning. Support implementation of State mandates regarding energy consumption and greenhouse gas reduction, including AB32 and S13375. Promote land use and circulation patterns that result in multi-purpose automobile trips and that facilitate the use of local and regional transit; continue to advance land use patterns that provide employment and PL ENG A, 1 3 housing opportunities for City residents in a manner that allows for practical options for mobility other than by automobile. Support the development of private sources of sustainable and RC -4.5 O O environmentally friendly energy supplies, provided these are consistent with City aesthetic and public safety goals. Continue to make the recruitment and retention of "green" industries a RD CM, A, G 4 priority in conjunction with economic development strategies. PL Serve as a role model by adopting recognizable standards and incorporating the use of sustainable strategies for new and existing RC -5.1 O public buildings that maximize occupant health and productivity, minimize operating costs, and provide good environmental stewardship. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-40 R A N C H 0 CUCA MONGA GENERAL P L A N RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appendix A: Implementation Flan A-32 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GE N ERAL P L A N Action Ty pe 72 c, V General Plan Policy C y d > CCh w 7 y ; C C fn v 2 O O a+ U d dImplementation Action(s) ay o o a- d c cn a = W rn W u- a - Continue to assess that the recreational needs of the City's residents are consistent with the City's parkland standard, and determine possible re- CS PL, ENG A 4 use or conversion of infill sites for recreational uses to serve areas within the City with a disproportionate amount of parkland. Develop parks that contribute to active and healthy lifestyles, and CS -1.2 O allow for a balanced commitment to both organized recreation activities and passive park environments. Move forward with plans to continue to develop Central Park, expand Etiwanda Creek Park, add one new Community park, one new Special CS CM' A 4 Use Facility, and two new Neighborhood parks. Incorporate active and ENG passive facilities into new parks. CS -1.3 O Continue to develop Central Park as envisioned in the Central Park Master Plan. Continue to prioritize implementation of the improvements for Central CS ENG, PL A 4 Park as part of the City's CIP process. CS -1.4 O Pursue developing an outdoor special use facility that includes a multi -field sports complex. Continue to prioritize development of a sports complex and determine CS ENG, A 4 funding mechanisms, including corporate sponsorships/partnerships. RD, PL Continue to require new development to provide needed park CS -1.5 O facilities through the various measures and tools available to the City (e.g., in -lieu fees and/or land dedication). Continue to make the provision of turn -key park and recreational facilities PL ENG. A, D, I, 4 the first priority over in -lieu fees for new residential development. CS K Pursue and expand joint -use of public lands that are available and CS -1.6 O suitable for recreational purposes, including school district properties and flood control district, water district, and other utility properties. Continue to coordinate with other agencies holding public lands for possible joint -use, trail easements, or re -use to serve park/recreation PL ENG A, K 4 particularly with school district properties. Encourage public safety and compatibility with adjacent uses CS -1.7 O through park location and design, including the location of buildings, lighting, parking, public transit, emergency access, and pedestrian/bicycle access. Continue to utilize the Recreation Needs and System Recommendation CS PL, ENG A, K 4 Study and the park master plan concept in park planning. CS -1.8 O O Continue to build, renovate, and maintain parks in a manner that is environmentally sustainable. Appendix A: Implementation Flan A-32 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GE N ERAL P L A N Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H C C U C A M 0 N u A G E N E R A L P L A N 33 Action Type Q d U General Plan Policy � d � R CL •`-' 7 w N d = C N O) Q C O fn U la O O C r d Implementation Action(s) E a y ° o o CL a a cn - a- cn of LL L a Continue to provide for maintenance, renovation and new construction of City parks in compliance with City policies, upgrading wastewater ENG CS, PL, A, B, C 4 systems as needed, and as technology evolves, substitute material that PW could reduce maintenance costs and is environmentally friendly. Develop intermediate sized (10-12 acre) parks with lighted athletic CS -1.9 O fields and appropriate parking to accommodate community sports programs. Update the City's Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendation Study to determine the location for intermediate -sized park sites CS PL, ENG A, B, C 7 specifically developed for athletic field use. This may include joint -use facilities with a school district. Integrate Healthy RC activities, classes, and programs with CS -2.1 O recreational services that contribute to the health, fitness, and minds of participants. Continue to provide City -sponsored recreational programs and classes at CS CM A, 1 4 recreational centers/parks. CS -2.2 O O Provide high-quality Community Services programs that are flexible and responsive to the community's changing needs. Continue to provide active recreational opportunities through leagues CS CM A, 1 4 and organized sports. Plan and conduct community special events that bring residents CS -2.3 O together to create an enhanced quality of life and promote economic development. Plan for community events through the annual budgeting process. CS RD, CM A, 1 4 Continue to consult with non-profit sports organizations and CS -2.4 O recreational groups to support their offering of diverse recreational programs that complement and supplement those of the City. Continue to serve as a clearinghouse to coordinate among the various CS A, 1 4 sport leagues to make fields and facilities available. Continue to make community facilities and park amenities available CS -2.5 O for rental by community residents, non-profit groups and businesses to meet their recreational and business needs. Continue to promote the City's various rental facility types by ensuring that a complete summary of locations, facilities, services, fees, and CS A 4 applications are available. Continue broad-based public outreach activities that inform CS -2.6 O residents of all available Community Services programs and services, and obtain input from the community regarding program and service needs. Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H C C U C A M 0 N u A G E N E R A L P L A N 33 Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-44 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action r Ty pe a) U General Plan Policy d 9 O Q >, w 0 O UO O O w U o U Implementation Action(s) B Q y o o- CL a CL UU)a. rnn of Li a` RC -8.7 O O Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological, 7 1 T7 educational, and other scientific study purposes. Same action as identified for RC -8.3. PL ENG A, 1 4 PF -1.1 O Continue to implement high-quality standards for new public facilities and improvements to existing buildings. Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality architectural treatment and green building design in all new and PL ENG A, B, C 5 remodeled civic facilities. PF -1.2 O Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings, events, and celebrations. Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A, B, C 3 facilities to community groups. PF -1.3 O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers where they will serve populations with the greatest needs. Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as CS ENG, PL A 6 neighborhoods evolve. PF -1 A O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their lifespan. Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for PW CS, LIB, A, B, C 4 existing public facilities. AC PF -1.5 O O Continue to incorporate low -maintenance features into public facilities consistent with the City's sustainability plan. Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part PW PL, CS, A, B, C 3 of the on-going maintenance program. BS PF -1.6 O Maintain multi -functional, flexible, and complementary space at community facilities. Same action as identified for PF -1.2. CS PW A, B, C 3 Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit organizations, school districts, and community organizations. Look PF -1.7 O for opportunities to create joint -use community space at facilities owned by private organizations such as faith -based groups and service clubs. Same action as identified for CS -2.5. CS A 4 Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of PF -2.1 O O joint -use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities, to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and education. Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater CS SD A, K 5 optimization of school facilities to service the entire community. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-44 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN RAILROAD CROSSINGS Appendix A: implementation Plan R A N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A N A-19 Action Ty pe U General Plan Policy N c a� d 3 O m > _ c — M3 Cf) U N O O � °' Implementation Action(s) E Q y C O o CL a a cn - a tn C� u- - a Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City, to CM -1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho Cucamonga. ■ Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. ■ Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, 1 7 ■ Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. ■ Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. ■ Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock. ■ Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange. ■ Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street. Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for CM -1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM -2.1 and CM -3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM -1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM -2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, 1 4 funding. CM -1.4 OO Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. A, E. Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and ENG CS F, H, I 4 adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A: implementation Plan R A N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A N A-19 Appendix A: Implementation Plan A -2E RANCHO CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL PLAN Action w Type U General Plan Policy O •y O w += d Cl O fn U O O C w '_' °'U Implementation Action(s) E a y o o CL ° a c- (n •L a d LL a - Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM -4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM -4.1. ENG A, D 3 CM -4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM -4.1. ENG PW A, D, 3 Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM -4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A, D, 4 and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM -5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development, including non -automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM -5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non -automobile solutions, prior to, or concurrent with, project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4 provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks, trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A -2E RANCHO CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL PLAN r -- STREETS Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A N A- 19 Action Type s m General Plan Policy c S 3 a o a W o U dai a Implementation Action(s) E Q Q o CL a- CL U) a0 ` cn W e. a Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City, to CM 1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho Cucamonga. ■ Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. ■ Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, 1 7 ■ Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. • Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. • Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. • Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock. ■ Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange. ■ Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street. Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for CM -1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM -2.1 and CM -3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM -1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM -2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, 1 4 funding. CM -1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. A, E Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and ENG CS F, H, I 4 adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A N A- 19 Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-20 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action Type General Plan Policy c 3 m oCL > .. , T d w c o, c . O cn N � m 0 Implementation Action(s) B Q y o O a ° a- 0_ v) c a. 7 d vn 0: 3 u- 0 - Implement Implement street design standards per this General Plan, except that modified standards may be applied where appropriate on CM -1.5 O arterial corridors relating to transit, bicycle facilities, sidewalks, and on -street parking to be context sensitive to adjacent land uses and districts, and to all roadway users, including transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Integrate into the CIP process the planning of modified standards for Foothill Boulevard to accommodate BRT and for other arterials as ENG PL A, D, 1 4 appropriate to reflect the bikeway plan and pedestrian improvements necessary to support Mixed Use districts. CM -1.6 O Pursue a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the BNSF Railway line. Grade separations currently exist at Haven and Milliken Avenues. Due to truck traffic associated with the southeast industrial area, the City ENG PL A, E, 1 4 supports creating a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the BNSF Railway line. CM -2.1 O O Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide. Implement the Bicycle Master Plan included in the Community Mobility Chapter. Require that pedestrian facilities and connections be provided as part of all development projects, with an emphasis on connections within Mixed Use districts. Implement all bicycling and walking policies and Mobility ENG PL, RD A, D, 1 4 Element components. Preparation and distribute bike route maps and bike facilities information. Publish and make readily available pedestrian route maps and pedestrian facilities information. Encourage all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles CM -2.2 O traveled by automobiles, including enhanced transit access and land use approaches that provide compact and focused development along major transit corridors. Same actions as identified for LU -2.1, LU -5.4, LU -5.6, and CM -2.1. ENG PL A, D, 1 4 CM -2.3 O Support the use of hybrid, electric, and low/zero emission vehicles. Continue to maintain the Green Team Sustainability Action Matrix that identifies current and proposed efforts that procure vehicles that includes providing gas -efficient vehicles. CM PW AS, A, E, F 7 Amend the Development Code as appropriate to accommodate alternative fuel service stations and charging facilities. =CM -2.4O Replace City vehicles with energy-efficient and alternative fuel source models when replacing vehicles or adding to the City's fleet. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-20 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-26 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL P L A N Action w Ty pe Q W U Plan Policy 3General O >, Y 2 iC d y ++ 0 M E O U U 1a O o c w U o Implementation Action(s) E a No o a a a U) c a- d cn W LL - a - Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM -4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM -4.1. ENG A, D 3 CM -4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM -4.1. ENG PW A, �, 3 Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM -4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A. D, 4 and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM -5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development, including non -automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM -5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non -automobile solutions, prior to, or concurrent with, project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4 provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks, trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-26 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL P L A N Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H O CUCAMONGA G EN ERAL P L A N A-31 Action w Type s 0General m U Plan Policy c a, N 3 d 0 C A r L L LL _ C W_ I.L y� I.L U i1 L C 0 0 w u Implementation Action(s) E a° 'a o _ULd 0 a- OL o. Q cn L a. fn X LL L 4. ED -3.7 O O Support access to local and regional educational resources that provide educational opportunities to local residents and workers. Coordinate with local and regional centers for higher education to RD PL, CM A 4 promote access to and programs for additional educational opportunities. ED -4.1 O Encourage high-quality design for infill development and continue to support new high quality uses. Same action as identified for LU -5.1 to 5.6. PL ENG A, I, K 4 ED -4.2 O Make green building and green business a priority. Same action as identified for LU -7.1 to 7.3. PL RD A, G 3 ED -4.3 O O Improve connectivity between development projects to create a more cohesive atmosphere. Same action as identified for LU -2.3. PL ENG A 5 ED -4.4 O Focus on enhancements to Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. Same action as identified for LU -5.1 to 5.6. PL ENG A, I, K 5 ED -4.5 O Review and understand the fiscal, job creation, and economic benefits of new proposed uses in the City's industrial -zoned areas. Focus a special economic development effort on assessing where re -use or conversion of industrial properties to other uses could occur. Identify RD PL A, G 5 potential conflicts in order to develop a strategy for when such conversions could be considered a benefit versus a cost. ED -5.1 O Engage in regional transit planning efforts. Continue to be involved in planning efforts to address regional transportation solutions, particularly those providing transit options. In PL ENG A, K 4 particular, work with Omnitrans in its efforts to establish BRT service in Rancho Cucamonga. ED -5.2 O Continue to capitalize on proximity to Interstate 10, Interstate 15, State Route 210, and the LA/Ontario International Airport. Review and assess the effectiveness of way -finding signage to ensure that the City's accessibility to 1-10, 1-15 and SR -210 from major areas of City commerce hubs is easily ascertained and facilitated. Begin RD PL, ENG A, G 4 programs to improve such signage where it is deficient or confusing. Maximize the benefits of a major airport just outside of the City's borders. Provide adequate park and recreational facilities that meet the City CS -1.1 O standard of 5.0 acres of parkland (including trails and special facilities) for every 1,000 persons. Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H O CUCAMONGA G EN ERAL P L A N A-31 TRAFFIC Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A25 Action w Type n General Plan Policy 3 o Q T Y U C .y fn LC C O O O1 >, Uo U Implementation Action(s) E a N C o o CL L a a. cn a- 3 d cn W 3 u- 0- cm- CM- Continue to provide pedestrian amenities on sidewalks on major O streets that are key pedestrian routes, including the provision of 3.11 benches, shade trees, and trash cans. Identify key pedestrian travel corridors citywide, and prepare a Citywide Pedestrian Circulation Study to determine pedestrian amenity needs, capital and operating funding sources, and a phased implementation program. Develop a program for gradually installing public amenities A B such as streetlights, benches, trash containers, art, drinking fountains, ENG PL C D' 5 landscaping, etc. that will enhance the pedestrian environment and encourage increased use of transit. Use both the CIP process and other funding sources, including a program whereby businesses or residents may sponsor street furniture and/or landscaped areas. CM- Continue to require that the siting and architectural design of new 3.12 O development promote safety, pedestrian -friendly design, and access to transit facilities. Develop standards to be applied to development projects along transit PL ENG 1 4 corridors that require transit and pedestrian accessibility. Establish a number of bike hubs in the City (centralized locations CM- O with convenient bike parking for trip destinations or transfer to 3.13 other transportation modes), at key transit nodes, and at commercial nodes. Conduct a study to determine the best locations for bike hubs in the City, and develop a plan, wayfinding program, and implementation process for ENG PL, RD A' B' 4 providing bike hubs that provide secure bicycle lockers, bike racks, and C, D connections to transit at key locations in the City. CM- O Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access to local and regional 3.14 transit, including facilitating connections to transit. Same action as identified for CM -3.7. ENG PL 1 4 CM Coordinate the provision of the non -motorized networks (bicycle 3.15 O and pedestrian) with adjacent jurisdictions to maximize sub - regional connectivity. Same action as identified for CM -3.7. ENG PL A, E, F 4 CM- O Establish fixed -route local circulator bus service connecting major 3.16 activity centers. Explore development of a fixed -route local circulator bus system, station ENG PL A, E, H 5 location, and funding mechanisms. Continue to implement traffic management and traffic signal CM -4.1 O operations measures along the arterial roadway to minimize delay and congestion for all modes, without adversely impacting transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A25 Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-26 RANCHO C U C A M 0 N G A GENERAL PLAN Action Type fl General Plan Policy v c3 o T 0 >, vO >+ C O 0) +_> d Implementation Action(s) E a y o O a. n. CL vn i a 7 Gf cn 7 LL a. Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM -4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM -4.1. ENG A, D 3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures CM -4.3 and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM -4.1. ENG PW A, D' 3 Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM -4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A' D, 4 and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM -5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development, including non -automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts O associated with new development prior to project approval, and CM -5.2 require adequate mitigation measures, including non -automobile solutions, prior to, or concurrent with, project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4 provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks, trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-26 RANCHO C U C A M 0 N G A GENERAL PLAN FUTURE &UNFUNDED Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H O CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN Action w Ty e d U General Plan Policy c y 3 0 C �. P d C C O (n �, U T C O O 0 y o Implementation Action(s) B a o o CL a v) a o V)W LL — a Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City, to CM -1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho Cucamonga. • Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. ■ Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. ENG A. D. 1 7 ■ Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. ■ Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. • Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. ■ Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock. ■ Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange. ■ Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street. Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for CM -1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM -2.1 and CM -3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM -1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM -2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, 1 4 funding. CM -1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. A. E. Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and ENG CS F, H. I 4 adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H O CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-26 RANCHO C U C A M 0 N G A GENERAL PLAN Action Y Type mGeneral Plan Policy C d 3 - A O y > - i 3 d C O (n Q' �, U A @ O O 6 U o U Implementation Action(s) E a s o o a. a a (n a cn W LL - a` Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM -4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM -4.1. ENG A, D 3 CM -4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM -4.1. ENG PW A, FD, 3 Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM -4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A, D. 4 and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM -5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development, including non -automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM -5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non -automobile solutions, prior to, or concurrent with, project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4 provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks, trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-26 RANCHO C U C A M 0 N G A GENERAL PLAN Appendix A: implementation Plan A-32 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL PLAN Action y Type U General Plan Policy C �, CO 3 (D •y >, i d - +' C y OZ C O U) >, U T C O O C w U d U Implementation Action(s) E Q y o o a- a- cn a- <n u- a. Continue to assess that the recreational needs of the City's residents are consistent with the City's parkland standard, and determine possible re- CS PL, ENG A 4 use or conversion of infill sites for recreational uses to serve areas within the City with a disproportionate amount of parkland. Develop parks that contribute to active and healthy lifestyles, and CS -1.2 O allow for a balanced commitment to both organized recreation activities and passive park environments. Move forward with plans to continue to develop Central Park, expand Etiwanda Creek Park, add one new Community park, one new Special CS CM' A 4 Use Facility, and two new Neighborhood parks. Incorporate active and ENG passive facilities into new parks. CS -1.3 O Continue to develop Central Park as envisioned in the Central Park Master Plan. Continue to prioritize implementation of the improvements for Central CS ENG, PL A 4 Park as part of the City's CIP process. CS -1.4 O Pursue developing an outdoor special use facility that includes a multi -field sports complex. Continue to prioritize development of a sports complex and determine CS ENG, A 4 funding mechanisms, including corporate sponsorships/partnerships. RD, PL Continue to require new development to provide needed park CS -1.5 O facilities through the various measures and tools available to the City (e.g., in -lieu fees and/or land dedication). Continue to make the provision of turn -key park and recreational facilities PL ENG, A, D, I, 4 the first priority over in -lieu fees for new residential development. CS K Pursue and expand joint -use of public lands that are available and CS -1.6 O suitable for recreational purposes, including school district properties and flood control district, water district, and other utility properties. Continue to coordinate with other agencies holding public lands for possible joint -use, trail easements, or re -use to serve park/recreation PL ENG A, K 4 particularly with school district properties. Encourage public safety and compatibility with adjacent uses CS -1.7 O through park location and design, including the location of buildings, lighting, parking, public transit, emergency access, and pedestrian/bicycle access. Continue to utilize the Recreation Needs and System Recommendation CS PL, ENG A, K 4 Study and the park master plan concept in park planning. CS -1.8 O O Continue to build, renovate, and maintain parks in a manner that is environmentally sustainable. Appendix A: implementation Plan A-32 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL PLAN Appendix R: Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A N' Action T pe 0General o Plan Policy 32 0 �, v cn V R O O o 0 Implementation Action(s) E a N o O IL a Q cn - 3 0 <n = 7 u_ a Continue to provide for maintenance, renovation and new construction of City parks in compliance with City policies, upgrading wastewater ENG CS, PL, A, B, C 4 systems as needed, and as technology evolves, substitute material that PW could reduce maintenance costs and is environmentally friendly. Develop intermediate sized (10-12 acre) parks with lighted athletic CS -1.9 O fields and appropriate parking to accommodate community sports programs. Update the City's Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendation Study to determine the location for intermediate -sized park sites CS PL, ENG A, B, C 7 specifically developed for athletic field use. This may include joint -use facilities with a school district. Integrate Healthy RC activities, classes, and programs with CS -2.1 O recreational services that contribute to the health, fitness, and minds of participants. Continue to provide City -sponsored recreational programs and classes at CS CM A, 1 4 recreational centers/parks. CS -2.2 O O Provide high-quality Community Services programs that are flexible and responsive to the community's changing needs. Continue to provide active recreational opportunities through leagues CS CM A, 1 4 and organized sports. Plan and conduct community special events that bring residents CS -2.3 O together to create an enhanced quality of life and promote economic development. Plan for community events through the annual budgeting process. CS RD, CM A, 1 4 Continue to consult with non-profit sports organizations and CS -2.4 O recreational groups to support their offering of diverse recreational programs that complement and supplement those of the City. Continue to serve as a clearinghouse to coordinate among the various CS A, 1 4 sport leagues to make fields and facilities available. Continue to make community facilities and park amenities available CS -2.5 O for rental by community residents, non-profit groups and businesses to meet their recreational and business needs. Continue to promote the City's various rental facility types by ensuring that a complete summary of locations, facilities, services, fees, and CS A 4 applications are available. Continue broad-based public outreach activities that inform CS -2.6 O residents of all available Community Services programs and services, and obtain input from the community regarding program and service needs. Appendix R: Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A N' Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-30 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL P L A IN Action Ty pe a U General Plan Policy m 3 W O W y O (n .+ U @ L 0 O w o Implementation Action(s) E a N c o O a. L Q L 3 G% M ILL Expand recreation and cultural attractions to enhance ED -2.3 O tourism/visitor potential and to boost sales and transient occupancy tax. Develop brochures or links from the City's web site to showcase the various recreational and cultural venues to attract visitors to the City. Enhancement of cultural amenities, including regional entertainment RD CS A 7 options, recreation, and historic preservation, will help to embellish the City's reputation as a destination for a wide range of visitors. Expand lodging choices in the City through the recruitment and ED -2.4 O placement of full-service hotels that will complement the existing select -service hotel portfolio. Review and update marketing strategies (land surveys, infrastructure availability, and modes of transportation) to solicit the development of a RD PL A, G 4 full-service lodging facility. Make sure that zoning regulations can accommodate a full-service hotel at desired locations. ED -3.1 O O Continue to make public safety a priority. Use the annual budgeting process to allocate funding for public safety services, equipment, and facilities commensurate with the City's service CM PD, FD A 6 objectives. ED -3.2 O Provide community and cultural amenities. Same action as identified for ED -2.3. CS CM, RD A 4 ED -3.3 O Maintain a healthy fiscal balance. Use the annual budgeting process to check that revenues from all CM AS, FIN A, G 1 sources continue to more than match projected spending. ED -3.4 O O Improve internal circulation for all modes of transportation, consistent with the concept of "Complete Streets". Same action as identified for LU -3.1 to 3.8. ENG PL A, G' 4 ED -3.5 O Facilitate development of additional local and regional entertainment venues. Focus a special economic development team on the task of working towards attracting developers and investors interested in responding to RD PL A, G 6 local and regional demand for new entertainment options. ED -3.6 O Leverage the City's quality of life amenities to attract more knowledge-based workers. Expand the Economic Development Strategy to market Rancho Cucamonga's civic assets, including parks, recreation and community RD PL, CS A, G 4 enrichment facilities and programs, trails, and quality school districts. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-30 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL P L A IN Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-57 Action w T pe U General Plan Policy 3 OQ. >, O fn T V 2 O O C w cImplementation Action(s) E a ° `O a n.- a v) a- W cn W ii a`. PL, AS, A B Same actions as identified for RC -4.1 to RC -4.5. ENG ENG, CM, BS, C, E, 3 PW, FIN G, I Encourage development of transit -oriented and infill development, PS -12.3 O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative transportation. Same action as identified for RC -4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3 Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure, and support PS -12.4 O public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the potential for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). Same action as identified for RC -4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3 Provide green building incentives, assess green building techniques as a formal stage of project review, and develop a green PS -12.5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and existing buildings. Adaptation strategies will also include increased water efficiency in buildings. Same actions as identified for RC -6.1 to RC -6.4 PL BN'G A, I, K 4 Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re -use and PS -12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers. Same action as identified for PF -7.1. ENG PL A 3 PS -12.7 O O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native and drought -resistant planting), and preservation of open space. Same actions as identified for RC -1.1, RC -8.1 to RC -8.7. PL PW ' A, 1 4 PS -12.8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in City operations and maintenance. Same actions as identified for RC -5.1 to RC -5.3. AS CM, FIN, PW A, B, C, E, K 4 Develop energy- or climate change -themed publications and workshops, facilitating energy audits for residents, and establishing O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public PS -12.9 awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Same action as identified for RC -5.1. CM ENG A, K 4 Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific PS -13.1 O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour map depicting future noise levels (Figure PS -10) should be used by the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility. Appendix A: Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-57 RANCHO UCAMONGA [ ALIFORNIA 'low r N ■ ■ ■ _ r r ■ ONE ■ ■ r ■ ■ �■ M ■ r ■ ■ Staff Recommends Approval of: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19532 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Historic Cucamonga Gas Station Rehabilitation Route 661ECA May 28, 2014 a r. f �� I ; �� �;� ?AJ 4 - � �; .� _� �.k. � v �� �� � r. � � � ;� ,':a ..,. ?i; '� 1`� 1 f t' �"� r, �.r 3 ,r � �' � �.i �' ., , .x f. 4 a .axe=�w3 wllrloi�.!'i 4 s �'�� ,; t � �M1. ,. 'r. � I� L � w h 4, y�Z `; > 4 : � .... �' :_, ,- _�. _..� t9'- "-dd. _ ��.. . };� '` �r`i � �� � ~� ,.. _�, ���� 'Y 3 �! I 1 all. kry I �> >KNOWN IECIE CAROUTE_ CROUTE b L E E t 17 .—'f �! F , k 3 k/.,1 a • j K A F, -000 4**A i A4 IL N Vo - PA 0 7 r` r ,� MIT I' LJ la f ft i u N-41 ry "A", ..2 0r F�•Pj�il�t�!_YlI•i` Nicr S�pggGF __ — O _ AREA REA CANOPY n o rr O O a001HILL RLVU � SERVICE STATION FLOOR PLAN SITE PLAN LIT , ,o 1� rx us RANCHO CUCAMONGA - SERVICE STATION RENOVATION 9670 FOOTHILL BLVD. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 Fuel 66 ROUTE 66 IECA 66 ®JOE A. RADIOS AIA, Architect 9AOFOOTHNIBLVD SUIOE 1W418 RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CALIFORNIA 91100 Arclrilmum r Plmnirtg r Inlaip PHONE:(9M 271.1024 SERVICE GARAGE FRONT ELEVATION 1i1G 1G CONFEREAICE I 1 1 E E Ik k I ' — ••-• �� p9PlAV MEA CAMONGq _._. UGAMONG,4"��ARAG SUPER SERVICE OFFICIAL will E qPER MS. AVIS GENERAL REPAIRING B�ATTERV B STARTERS SERVICE BRAKE TESTING STATION N:218 h,111, IV, -' LP4 O O C SERVICE GARAGE FRONT ELEVATION 1i1G 1G CONFEREAICE I 1 1 E E Ik k I ' — ••-• �� p9PlAV MEA CAMONGq _._. GAFZ A E SUPER SERVICE OFFICIAL will BRAKE TESTING STATION N:218 -' LP4 O O C SERVICE GARAGE FLOOR PLAN .. RANCHO CUCAMONGA - SERVICE STATION RENOVATION ovW us 9670_ FOOTHILL BLVD. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 us kk 66„ ROUTE 661ECA 66J 1I—FO0THILL 8LV0. SURE I-5 RANCHOCIIC NGA.CALIFgiHIA911JO PHONE (909) 9)1-10]1 oohs NORTH RESTROOM ELEVATION RES17POM-FLOQR PLAN -7" — JOE A. RAMOS AIA, Architect Archiletturc • Phi • Immo, �R J Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 Nature of Changes R. NCHID (FnIroOM • Reinstate omitted development standards • Correct technical errors • Streamline development review process • Clarify existing regulations �.�:J Proposed Changes AMOWA • Development Review Process — Elimination of the Grading Review Committee — Addition of Public Works representative to the Technical Review Committee • Clarifications to Planning applications • New allowed use — Microbrewery Proposed Changes i�I1CAN0.4G i 4L KLIMUM • Clarifying text — Front yard setbacks — Roof mounted A/C units — Accessory Structures — Outdoor display and sales • Correct an error in the water efficient landscape calculation IT�� R Proposed Changes wlz yn� • Temporary Uses — Eliminate redundant text — Allow for extended parking lot sales with a Conditional Use Permit • Commercial, Office and Industrial Design — Eliminate redundant design standards Recommendation RAW A • Resolution No. 14-15 — Adopt Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts — Recommend approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00205 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19505 - ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC - A request to subdivide a 0.29 acre parcel into two lots for a site located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue in the Low (L) Residential Development District; APN: 0209-122-01. Related File: Variance DRC2014- 00112. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2014- 00112 - ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC - A request for a variance to reduce the minimum net average lot size in connection with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505. L'a`m RANCHO CUCAMONGA k' m 0'f C' m q rro,01 uravw Al- . 'It a 54 1 A�- 0.1 Ao lilt, q rro,01 Aw" z-.wum- jw. q rro,01 05E0 10' VACATION 13C,0� 5EI) RICHT OF 2470"R 1 scn. x 24TII STREET - -�-- - - - 175,00 N89.11'06'W 659.00 b (N89'S0'W 660) '4 OR GINAL RIGGHTCF 'NAY pLl n IC) x i _ k L � 2 --- ns O r x —I-- --------------- HOIJaE NTS 14U ® 7,3c r�wrukr ;NGS so a' _Os> - 10.00 d — iF+v�to�r d f1YT 72' a-% '^ 47 W CD n A i tj �1 '^4 M. ^- -- -I -1 ARCEL P C Jr haW W it \ -11L-1 -i- o n o xm n [ P n E o a i 05E0 10' VACATION 13C,0� 5EI) RICHT OF 2470"R 1 scn. x 24TII STREET - -�-- - - - 175,00 N89.11'06'W 659.00 b (N89'S0'W 660) '4 OR GINAL RIGGHTCF 'NAY pLl n IC) x c�r> qF JC'C TT ,Cd OS-DdNd Ezil <5c: <S2) V c . p eaw��cr,rr ,��ar_xas,gv I 00 AVID JC MON '3_ c08d — � - r� -:.':' 6 i ' . '� a 1 00'09£ 3.89,E2.00N HnuHAV UHINHO •C I V c . p eaw��cr,rr ,��ar_xas,gv I 00 AVID JC MON '3_ c08d — � - r� -:.':' 6 i ' . '� a 1 00'09£ 3.89,E2.00N HnuHAV UHINHO Parcel Area Summary • Previous: 12,500 sf • Current (with vacations): 15,547 sf • Proposed Subdivision: — Parcel 1: 7,627 sf —Parcel 2: 7,920 sf • Low Residential Lot Size Standards: — Minimum Lot Size: 7,200 sf —Minimum Net Average: 8,000 sf RANCHO CUCAMONGA Environmental Assessment: Negative Declaration Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 and Variance DRC2014-00112 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. RANCHO CUCAMONGA f Development Review DRC2013-01118, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518 and Uniform Sign Program Amendment DRC 2013-01120 0 Site & Land • Original project site: 20.7 Acres — Approved November 12, 2010 (DRC2007- 00551 /SUBTPM 18794) — 12 buildings ranging from 5k to 130k — 2 buildings constructed (A1 /A2 and B) • Current project: 8.61 acres of vacant land • Remainder parcel: Parcel 12 of Parcel Map 18794 (.89 acres) will remain vacant (south side of 7tn Street). CI t of rr r,, Parcel Map + ,< v,, I� e'� - mace\ WA;, \ rMe 2 I, rAarel , \ \ A PAW& i \ 175 AOI= \ r► L 1 �'\ PpaCE PARCEL] g 7./8ACF" � !i rPacet ° \ snAOQa Mme' 4l— _ \ z P►tel ,o { rA�t` ,-1 i 'i • Original project Parcel Map 18794 20.7 Acres • Parcels 1 & 3 of Parcel Map 18794 are currently occupied with Buildings Al /A2 and B. • Remaining 8.61 acres will be consolidated into 3 parcels under Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518 7 ■ w i � f �, A r},y1_ city of I � RANCH l CUCAM40 C AZZAL I F "i F� REMEN 6 0 NEESE City of RANCII L�. CUCAMO C Al2AL I F O Rg N� 1 ; 0 ■ FG ����. Cit), of RANCHO CUCAMI �`�+'M C AZ&L I F 0 r--1 cille p;mq EM Recommendation • Adopt an Addendum to the prior MND • No change in circumstances or project that would create more severe impacts • New mitigation measure: soundwall along the northwestern project boundary • 3 Entitlements for consideration: • Design Review D RC2013-01118 • Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM 19518 • Uniform Sign Program Amendment D RC2013-01120