Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-06-11-Agenda Packet-PC-HPC
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKSHOP OF RNCHO CUC&MONCA THE PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 11, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center RAINS ROOM 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell_ Vice Chairman Fletcher ® Munoz_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca_ II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,making loud noises,or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00252 - JOE RAMOS FOR SOHEILA AZIZI-A request for a Planning Commission Workshop review of a conceptual site plan and elevations for a 2-story office building with a floor area of 8,492 square feet on the undeveloped portion of a property of 1.25 acres that is partially developed with a 2-story office building with a floor area of 4,008 square feet and several smaller structures with a combined floor area of 1,830 square feet in the ® Commercial Office (CO) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, at 10213 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0208-331-07. PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP JUNE 11, 2014 HO Page 2 IV. - ADJOURNMENT- 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee, hereby certify that a true,accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 5, 2014,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday,7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP JUNE 11, 2014 � Page 3 N APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please tum off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us 0 � a VicinityMap Planning CoWorkshols JUNE 11 , 2014 2 P' I 1 E a O o i � o ' t 1 n V = _ = Y t a o ' em ` c � 0 19th St f Base Line Base Line i d /1rChurch e Church Foothill f Foothill N E Arrow Arrow C JPV t °c° f 8th o°C tai 1 io ]RE1 6th W C9 6th t € ; A 4th a = 4th * Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drivo Item A: PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00252 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: June 11, 2014RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00252 - JOE RAMOS FOR SOHEILA AZIZI -A request for a Planning Commission Workshop review of a conceptual site plan and elevations for a 2-story office building with a floor area of 8,492 square feet on the undeveloped portion of a property of 1.25 acre that is partially developed with a 2-story office building with a floor area of 4,008 square feet and several smaller structures with a combined floor area of 1,830 square feet within the Commercial Office (CO) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, located at 10213 Foothill Boulevard -APN: 0208-331-07. GENERAL: A. Pre-Application Review Process: The Pre-Application Review process is intended to • promote quality development and to facilitate the development review process. Although a Pre-Application Review is not required, it allows an applicant to present schematic designs to the Planning Commission during the early stages of concept plan preparation prior to the formal application and to receive broad, general comments and direction from the Planning Commission. The meeting is not a forum for debate and no formal decision or vote is made. After the meeting, staff prepares general minutes of the meeting that are sent to the applicant. B. Site Description: The project site is a 1.25 acre property located at 10213 Foothill Boulevard. The overall dimensions of the property are approximately 167 feet (east to west) by approximately 315 feet (north to south) (Exhibit B). The property is partially developed (Exhibit C); the developed area is located on the northern half of the parcel and is comprised of a two-story office building (Building A), two (2) legal, non-conforming single-family residences (Buildings B and C), and a garage (Building D). The office building was formerly a single-family residence. This residence, known as the Mitchell Family Residence, was designated as a historic landmark by the Historic Preservation Commission on November 20, 2002 (Related files: Landmark Designation LD2002-00003 and Mills Act Agreement MA2002-00001, Exhibit.H). The designation does not include the non-conforming .residences or the garage. The conversion of the residence to an office and modifications to the exterior of the building were subsequently approved on December 19, 2002 (Related file: Minor Development Review DRC2002-00806, Exhibit 1). The remainder of the developed part of the property is dedicated to parking and landscaping. The undeveloped part of the property consists of low grass and several trees. To the west of the property, is a child care facility (Kindercare), while to the north is ® a condominium complex (Villaggio on Route 66). The properties to the south are single-family residences. The property to the east is vacant. Item A-1 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00252—JOE RAMOS FOR SOHEILA AZIZI June 11, 2014 Page 2 C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Project Site - Office Building and Single-Family Residences (Legally, Non-Conforming); Commercial Office (CO) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District North - Condominium complex; Community Commercial (CC) District; Commercial Office (CO) District, Foothill Boulevard South- Single-Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District East - Vacant; Commercial Office (CO) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District West - Child care facility; Commercial Office (CO) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Commercial North - Mixed Use South - Low Residential East - Mixed Use West - General Commercial E. Proiect Description: The applicant, on behalf of Soheila Azizi, proposes to construct a two-story office building with a floor area of 8,492 square feet and enlarge the parking lot. The proposed building will be located in the general area (hereafter referred to as the "project site") of.the existing garage, Building D, which will be demolished. The parking lot and new perimeter landscaping will be located to the south of the new building on the undeveloped part of the property. The other existing buildings are not a part of this project, and no modifications to those buildings are proposed. ANALYSIS: A. Land Use Compatibility: The proposed project is expected to be fully compatible with the on-site and surrounding land uses and development. The land uses along Foothill Boulevard in this general area are varied and include a mix of residences, commerce, and offices. The different architectural themes of the various buildings in the area reflect the design and technical standards that were current when they were built. There are numerous office buildings along Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue in the vicinity of the property including the office building to the west of the child care facility and the office building (Virginia Dare) at the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. B. Site Layout and Architecture: Because of the presence of the existing office building and single-family residences at the north side of the property, visibility of the project site and the new building will be limited. Nevertheless, the applicant's proposal will be designed to comply with the guidelines and policies established by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission. The layout of the project site and architecture of the building are generally consistent with these design goals, guidelines, and policies (Exhibit F). It will generally match the existing Italian themed architecture of the building and incorporate architectural features, details, materials, and colors of that building. The architecture of the proposed building will be similar to the condominium complex across the street to the north, the office building to the west of the child care facility, and the mixed use development located at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. Item A-2 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00252 —JOE RAMOS FOR SOHEILA AZIZI June 11, 2014 Page 3 The building will be divided into two (2) wings (Exhibit E). The building generally will have a height of 25 feet. The maximum height of a building within 100 feet of a residential district is 25 feet. The building will have a rear setback of approximately 83 feet from the south property line. The most prominent features of the proposed building will be a large, decorative tower that visually connects the wings of the building and a second tower located at the northwest corner of the building. Although the towers will be 40 feet and 31 feet in height, respectively, they will be located more than 100 feet from the south property line and, therefore, comply with the technical standard for maximum building height. The expanded parking area will be located behind (south of) the proposed building relative to the street. The overall amount of parking that is required for both the existing and proposed office buildings is 50 parking stalls. There is no parking provided for the existing single-family residences. This issue should be included in the workshop discussion. Vehicle access to the project site will be via the existing access point at Foothill Boulevard. Design and Technical Comments: The applicant is advised that design and technical comments will be provided following the submittal of a formal Development Review application. C. Formal Application Submittal Requirements: The following applications/documents (and associated fees) will be required at the time of formal submittal: • 1. Development Review: $9,823.00 2. Tree Removal Permit: $772.26 3. Uniform Sign Program: $2,041.93 4. Sign Permit (for Notice of Filing Signs): $120.18 .5. Deposit for one (1) Notice of Filing Sign (at Foothill Boulevard for supplemental public notification purposes): $613 6. Mills Act Agreement (to amend the existing Mills Act Agreement): $1,407.62 D. Special Studies: The following special studies will be required at the time of formal submittal: 1.. Air Quality Study (including an analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and local significance thresholds and a hazardous risk assessment) 2. Arborist Study 3. Cultural Resources Study 4. Noise Study 5. Photometric Study NOTE: Additional special studies may be required following the submittal of a formal Development Review application. • E. Technical Issues—Enaineering: 1. Frontage improvements installed with Phases 1 and 2 of DRC2002-00806 include the project drive approach, curb, and gutter along the entire project frontage and Item A-3 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00252—JOE RAMOS FOR SOHEILA AZIZI June 11, 2014 Page 4 i property line adjacent sidewalk west of the driveway. If this proposal is Phase 3 of the previous project, parkway improvements east of the drive approach should be completed with the final phase. Missing improvements include sidewalk and one street light. 2. A retaining wall 4 feet north of the existing residence encroaches into the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. Unless that wall is relocated, there may not be sufficient room to install the ADA-compliant curb adjacent sidewalk to replace the existing gravel and stepping stones. 3. The number of parking stalls and drive aisle widths on-site shall be in accordance with Development Code Section 17.64. F. Design Issues and Preliminary Conditions of Armroval/Comments 1. Complete the Foothill Boulevard parkway improvements, including sidewalk east of the existing drive approach, street trees, and one streetlight. If the City Engineer determines it is not feasible to install any of these improvements at this time, a contribution in lieu of construction shall be paid to the City prior to Building Permit issuance. 2. Parkway improvements shall conform to the Foothill Boulevard-Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Program, including street lights. 3. Lines-of-sight should be plotted for the project driveway to see if it is possible to add street trees west of the drive approach. Respectfully submitted, Candyce umett Planning Manager CB: MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Existing Site Plan Exhibit D - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit E - Proposed Floor Plans Exhibit F - Proposed Elevations Exhibit G - Correspondence from the Applicant Exhibit H - Staff Report for Landmark Designation LD2002-00003 and Mills Act Agreement MA2002-00001 (including exhibits) Exhibit I - Approval Letter for Minor Development Review DRC2002-00806 (excluding Standard Conditions) Itpm A-4 CT A ;HERMOSA L# W j; SII Fi -TONW. -- g ---co, S. m d 'AVPP OR "ZINIll 7 cam allys a 7r In CHAFFEY pTLw LQ,-, , : AN A OR MANZAN '-f�k ITA il MAN2�ITA DR X!MAN G"Ar ST GOLDEN b, OR 1 1 D�EN ST 06• 10GOt pct LAaA COLLEGE S(VI.N I .1 ayFLP ST. PRADO -§"FLqT ST COUDEX ST wAmm j� gg. A 'VftD Cr .111FLOOST CO ObARTEI, III Sr E CA 1 ST COCA Sl E ..0. .BANYAN ST SHALE 8 __REGENCY tFxT M -DEOST BANYAN-ST. L MANDARIN MAMARINAVE LS BANYAN 19 of 6944 MIR40ORD, I 'LIBERNST W, , w- �w : - v -I. - P SOSTDCNTE ALTA 4Ap LAGLOIPADA "Ifoury �w: t2 R`0741I o4or AVE MISCUSCT S9 GIJO-z ,cf, 41m..CONGx11�N�� IIM±alpFl pt ;L` 15- G. LOMA L a �AW 1. CYPRESS IT • it- VVINUO, AVIL bi�id' Sf A, ORANGEST ORANGE ST ORANGE ST 'A Ll ORANGE SIT A I PISTOL DR 5,0 SOMERSETDR.. VE f SOr, S- - VINEYARD oWA JITA DMA "WRST AOR OR N`"NHIGHLANP Ve—I KOO A BERYL PARK luGHLARDAVE. -FINCHAVE FAq AVE M Si BLACROAKST RFICHAVEMW s�s GARDEN BY ITUVER LEAF 'FAMED 0 POST K e JHII g CATHEDRAL IT -,o I • <MATMPA- BAYWODDM IT 5:' xAxrucNEr PL W " 4e SHAW UPWOO ST TANG SlIt'll, is RING if SAGE D IT KAHERSTJ IN rWE IE CASO,cl IS 4 INA- S MIDI P, ST tsCCY PJ GALA AVE E y, 11 IT IE ga,- I , , I 19TH T A!V 1 15 W4 44QF % I 44AMILFON ST 5' HAMILTON Sr ,I I HENIEP DR ol �t; DEER G". AVE NN; 0AARITC4 ST �RUNI $I ALp LIM TIE. ON. 'a. JONGUIL P LTON 4 CANYON -r 12 Ull 'TJASIiER I Tj Ca MIGPDREFFIEST.' T MITE MIGN. TTF IN GN"`F"SrS "OLLY mi: AS 11 �DUEV OR ST AD PUPPERRIGE ON UEDIG DR ,ADV,RINE P, I t WCTOR/i ;0LILY SIT - MSM Pi JW AVAL ry mo�� I W G,,ST lft..km A 111)" 1 GRCHVI�4F ZI tl�ST. �v VICTOR] A. IMF MDR . -- . t, AVALON ST I ., - I --SIP v MIS _1 .... ?; . . IAMS r WOK 4�� T- .- , " :1 1/1�w -AVAUNCT IMI Va-m- CGUIDERYARADWIN MONTE VISTA St' If.LA VERNE ST U,,;V A, 2 MONTE VISTA QN4 VItTA, ST MONTiEVIS'Si UIP)U,Q, I Upow SIT ST At zm*mmpt WNTE VISTA ST`�. In, 'I S, CIRIMSr!g 0 LAW EST �i OR ,Nf S, SV:iELITO ST C LA VINE Si lk 1; y- z C) ST LAYINE ALTA A VINE ST IJU LA GIRANt ST" -tTp!'M"lk LA GFAMDE ST LOMA x > I A-I Q( Sl I�CARNELLAN NO 1.57 LOI el OR LOMITA DR"- ALTA Di A - 0 %-A LOMITA DR LOMA LA MESA DRcRVr RANCIAID(l >LOMITA AL3A @ PDBERDI ca 9 GI z NE�DSST 11 KBERDS LIONS CT -COBDOR. BASE UNE BASE LINE?_ ' CENTER RD Q,ov LADFRA r P�P,P PEPPER ,ST PEPPER Si U) t; S I ic I :a I FI; L k-)NL, SPUR LIBRARYF, I •f4w, A im�R-DR a > IRORWOGC Sr ;'S: RONWOODST E�- J,h-NDR, St DO - o� / AL sr II�OWOOD • ROYAL S-z'4 10 ALS) Cr4liNDER$4 st I g W, *'l, It AAMR. CALUMA CT ER t; m om. Kz MVERCT WFW&' P%lm M . 51, PPP RLD rALLE s7 vl :�. J, E.Aso ST U; S, 41�-STI. Ms49 14 ....... ALO ALTDITIT DEL Moo rl AIAIAIT HILL aLPRADo ..p $. I , "".. ANNINk Al LSA po�-,,oywf PARK "ST ALSAST Li Y .1s, x LAGO ST Rw NSA A CANDLEWOOD DONA 4, C, kl, Vol. Af CEDW� YEW QST 1. 25 %Bm 0 PROJECT SITE -Rm GT.AD (HIjRcf; t, RUTH 9 sr SIRET-r 19 MUSSERj Jk.i 9. xr VALLE CHURCH ST PARK VISTA IN ST 14 MUERTE. ST JCKSTmn� rs 'o, MIOCKS� CALE 9UR Zia 4 *1 .V�K I-FORO . Si ST 1wvm.. MOWA tj NOR" AIR TRYM BY A N ST '---ooQ%�I40f EFFEN ST �V.: A t; <URN st DOMET ST CwE It �,T T. 131. ARM M-A. RAJ INO AD 5 !s STAFFORD ST FAM-IL Y C V TERRA VISTA r SPORTS� Stalic,21 EST"'T ip TOWN CENTER CENTER,,` ESTACIA Sr EST"CT ISTOFIIC FOOTHILL BL MIND MILL IT < TIMBERLINE ON COURT stA FAIIIW IT Z HAMPEBEST. -IMPON r HOUSE y.LAQREL ST POLYPI PNEYIF.IT m IF CHELSEA a, G; - 7 > i I I A CITY Sr D N ! HALL EVON '4 'T IN, POLICE HERI?A,3��,\ IT IN DEWONG'T, gai :k DEVOWST TATIO4, -( HOSPITAL A-AV > PLACEA ST CERISEST ;L ovRI,Fv-w,R - I �r", BEAR 9 PLAGEN SrST Sr 4 V* V AIAPAVALUEYDI PLACERPLJICFA 101.09 L.. a APIUI <.% 9 R,CT VDAD,,A* GULCH tR DR MSKEUNI OR - FOREST GROVE IT GARDEN ST ST E5 CHERRY BLOSSOM ST - 0 1 IF if FRIANT ST ig a g FR ST k-g%MN SNOWFUDGEWY e , GUE". INGLENOOK PL E�All cffi .Onoswoon- OWILLE PL CM-LE SRRRFM� IT ARROW ROUTE C WTI ALPIMESTESENJQP "EST OREYSUCXLE PL DMV - CENTER I ORCHARD MEADOWS LN IF •BUSINESS CENTER DR; SALINA ST &L, WFLU"CT EDISON IF AUTUMN ILL PL SAU..Sl SALINA ST SAHGDIGORIO BAYBE RY ORe BAYBERRYWY G. uj rS IN, >—.0MV .4 W,umqp, Z BELL IT Lo > FULTON IT 14 uj .:, c� tj 16SIG13; > 9TH ST CUCAMONGA > slvw AE Uj ;T Mcilm-Ey ST 26TH ST S;2 BOWEN ST z JERSEY No JFJ CITY co 'RAN CORPORATE U FERO CA YARD24THST 3T OLD Lu MAIN ST o. TOWN g. "T PARK UNICROTAVE METROLINK TRAIN 8TH ST EXHIBIT A ACACIA ST AGAINST wDVNMNTWAY MST MST X. VA. A-5 CAMI AT CAMERON$T .5 ... b .axy • % orf _• ..� r gas. � ._.iil... � ._ _ _._�. _ �, ...,•, .. �. �.. � .�a..�...---.-.. Ham. . -..,-.. —• i - 4RIVIr ♦ '•-j 14 is ; .yr f� -.,..,fir•.J � +�• . - dft --- �Y -167 rp.' R I , r - GR PM I I (E) L_ J 2—STORY J �.. BUILDING PW S.F. U O J ®4� m 0 I W IARA J �/ �I ( ) IYTWE C! 1(E) EE/ p04s I I _ U) 1 (E)Y" w 1 I E) TR o$ I 99 E 0 TR (E) 6"HUFKocK WALL EXISTING SITE PLAN SCALE: 1"=40' No t h EXHIBIT C Item A-7 s y a / / AYR J,Nit w 5 'N / mlllllll / lit 1. AR / Sulft PRO 0 Sol { _�Wi 17, $�j'• /l' �Irq Shia T, q i, '• •o \I i 1 ------------------------------------------ E; ELEV. 77 �� ---' rr'-- 2215 s.f. ---------------------- 2110 s.f.--------------------------- Z --- ---------------------------------------------------- a SECOND STORY FLOOR PLAN SCALE. 1/8'-V-0- 2 t ' ELEV. ------------------- r-- ,t l 2215 s.f. 1594 s.f. Z Z ---- n--------n-------- ----------- FIRST STORY FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/9•-V_0- ~• �� EXHIBIT E Item A-9 •♦ •• 1.1.r�4,��4►)��:��.������:��•��•:������:���N►��:.. I.I.j.j.jaaaaaa•f-, I 1�1�1•I.I.I�I�I�I.I�I.I•I•I�A,.14-, I I I I I �� Illunniii 111 � . ■11111%�_�_.� NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION Ill llllllll 111 __ _ 1 Joe A. Ramos, AIA • Architect . C-19076 ® Architecture Planning Interiors TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga March 18, 2014 Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Letter of justification for proposed 2-story Professional Office Building @ 10213 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 We are proposing the development of a new 2-story Office Building of approximately 8,500 sq. ft. within a 1.25 acre parcel that includes an existing 4,000 sq. ft. 2-story Office Building and 2 single story residential rental units. The existing structures are part of the Historic Mitchell Family residence and are ® currently being used as professional offices and the residential units are to remain as rental units. The project will include site improvement through-out the entire site and incorporate landscaped courtyards and common open space amenities as well as appropriate landscape buffers to the residential zone to the south. We sincerely feel the development will enhance the existing site and compliment the architectural and economical vitality of the Foothill corridor. We hope you will give our project your most serious consideration and look forward to working with the City and staff toward a successful completion of this project. cerely, Joe A. Ra o Architect of record EXHIBIT G Z�1 •D0� California 91784 • Tel/Fax:909.981-3171 • E-mail:jramos.architect@adelphia.net Item A-11 T H E C I T Y O f RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: November 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Duane Morita, Contract Planner SUBJECT: LANDMARK DESIGNATION LD2002-00003 - SOHEILA AZIZI - AN APPLICATION TO DESIGNATE THE MITCHELL FAMILY RESIDENCE AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 10213 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD -APN: 208-331-07. RELATED FILES: LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT LA2002- 00003, MILLS ACT AGREEMENT MA2002-00001, AND MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00806. • MILLS ACT AGREEMENT MA2002-00001 -SOHEILA AZIZI -A REQUEST TO IMPLEMENT THE USE OF THE MILLS ACT TO REDUCE PROPERTY TAX ON THE MITCHELL FAMILY RESIDENCE, A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 10213 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN: 208-331-07. RELATED FILES: LANDMARK DESIGNATION LD2002-00003, LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT LA2002-00003, AND MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002- 00806. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission Recommends approval of Landmark Designation LD2002-00003 by adoption of the attached resolution and by minute action authorizing the Mayor to sign the Mills Act Agreement MA2002-00001. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Landmark Designation: The requested landmark designation is for the Mitchell residence. The subject structure qualifies for landmark designation based upon the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including the, following significant areas: historical, architectural, and neighborhood and geographic setting.' Details concerning these areas of significance are described in the Facts for Findings section outlined in the Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report dated November 13, 2002 (Exhibit "A") Mills Act Agreement: In accordance with City policy, the owner has requested a Mills Act Agreement. The concept of the Mills Act is to provide an incentive for the property owner to protect and preserve the property by retaining its characteristics of historical significance. Through the reduction of property taxes, the property owner is encouraged to reinvest the • money saved from the reduced property tax and use it on improvements to the property. The properties that enter into the agreement are to be inspected by City staff on an annual basis to EXHIBIT H. Item A-12 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LANDMARK DESIGNATION AND MILLS ACT AGREEMENT-SOHEILA AZIZI November 20, 2002 Page 2 determine whether notable progress has been made in rehabilitating the property. The exact amount of annual property tax savings to the owner are dependent upon the County Assessor's property valuation, which is based on income potential and the capitalization rate at the time of assessment. The Agreement Schedule List of Improvements has been drafted and reviewed and is attached for reference as Exhibit °C° of the attached Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report dated November 13, 2002. Approval of the Agreement is by minute action, authorizing the Mayor to sign the Property Tax Reduction Contract. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DMVs Exhibit °A° - Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report dated November 13, 2002 Resolution of Approval for Landmark Designation LD2002-00003 Item A-13 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Duane Morita, Planning Consultant SUBJECT: LANDMARK DESIGNATION LD2002-00003 - SOHEILA AZIZI - An application to designate the Mitchell family residence as a Historic Landmark, located at 10213 Foothill Boulevard as a Historic Landmark - APN: 208-331-07. Related files: Landmark Alteration Permit LA2002-00003, Mills Act Agreement MA2002-00001, and Minor Development Review DRC2002-00806- ® LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT LA2002-00003 - SOHEILA AZIZI - An application to convert the historic Mitchell family residence from residential to office use and to allow minor exterior changes, located at 10213 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-331-07. Related files: Landmark Designation LD2002-00003, Mills Act Agreement MA2002-00001, and Minor Development Review DRC2002-00806. MILLS ACT AGREEMENT MA2002-00001 - SOHEILA AZIZI - A request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax on the Mitchell family residence, a Historic Landmark, located at 10213 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-331-07. Related files: Landmark Designation LD2002-00003, Landmark Alteration Permit LA2002-00003, and Minor Deevelopment Review DRC2002-00806. BACKGROUND: A. Proiect Description: A Landmark Designation and Landmark Alteration Permit are necessary to protect the historic Mitchell family residence. The applicant is proposing to convert the Mitchell residence from a residential use to an office building. Tenant improvements are being considered. Minor changes to the building's exterior are also being proposed, including construction of a new stairway and re-plastering of an existing block wall. ® B. Site Characteristics: The 1.25-acre subject property is designated Office by the City General Plan and zoned CO (Commercial Office) by the City Development Code. The Mitchell residence is one of four structures located on-site. Three existing units are Item A-14 HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT LD2002-00003, LA2002-00003, MA 2002-00001 AZIZI LAW CENTER November 13, 2002 Page 2 located in two buildings immediately east of the Mitchell residence; a garage and dilapidated residence structure are located further to the south. Surrounding uses include an existing Kindercare to the west; a vacant parcel to the east; and single-family residences to the south. C. General: The Mitchell residence is a two-story rectangular structure of craftsman styling with Italianate influence. The roof is medium gable with red tile, exposed eaves and knee braces in gable end. The exterior is stucco. Second-story windows are single, rectangular pane with wood lintel and sill. Windows on the lower level have transoms with leaded glass. The front door is wood with leaded glass panels. A front arcade with a roof sundeck and castellation is. present, continuing around the west side of the structure. Multiple French windows open out onto the second-story deck. D. Historical Significance: The Mitchell residence is an example of a tum of the century vineyard house. Built by E. DeLarsen in 1918, the property is unique in that the housing for the vineyard workers was built close to the main Mitchell residence. In most vineyards, worker housing was typically located some distance away from the owner's house, usually back in the vineyards. DeLarsen owned the property from 1915 to 1927. It was then transferred through several different owners until 1943 when it was bought by the current owners, Ellsworth and Harriett Mitchell. The Mitchells have long been established within the community. Ellsworth's father established Mitchell and Son Plumbing in 1938 in Upland and the business continues under Ellsworth's children. ANALYSIS: A. Landmark Designation: The requested landmark designation is for the Mitchell residence. The subject structure qualifies for landmark designation based upon the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including the following significant areas: historical, architectural, and neighborhood and geographic setting. Details concerning these areas of significance are described in the Facts for Findings section of this staff report. B. Pr000sed Alterations: The applicant is proposing to convert the Mitchell residence from a residential use to an office building. Tenant improvements are being considered. Minor changes to the building's exterior are also being proposed, including construction of a new stairway and re-plastering of an existing block wall. All exterior modifications made to the structure will be "in kind" replacements that should resemble the original building materials and architectural features as much as possible. A separate Minor Development Review application is being processed which will address site planning and parking issues and the Conditions of Approval for the Minor Development Review will apply to the Landmark Alteration Permit. C. Mills Act Agreement: In accordance with City policy, the owner has requested a Mills Act Agreement. The,concept of the Mills Act is to provide an incentive for the property owner to protect and preserve the property by retaining its characteristics of historical significance. Through the reduction of property taxes, the property owner is encouraged to reinvest the money saved from the reduced property tax and use it on improvements to the property. The properties that enter into the agreement are to be inspected by City staff on an annual basis to determine whether notable progress has been made in rehabilitating the property. The exact amount of annual property tax savings to the owner are Item A-15 HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT LD2002-00003, LA2002-00003, MA 2002-00001 -AZIZI LAW CENTER November 13, 2002 • Page 3 dependent upon the County Assessor's property valuation, which is based on income potential and the capitalization rate at the time of assessment. The Agreement Schedule List of Improvements has been drafted and reviewed and is attached for reference. D. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Class 3.e of Article 19, Section 15308 of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: A. Historical Significance: Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. F= The house identifies the historic period of the early 1900s when grove and vineyard production was at its peak in the community and the region. The residence is an example of a vineyard house, which was common at the tum of the century. Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building, which was once common, but is now rare. ® Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style and ty design used by the once prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and vineyard houses. Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. F= The landmark-eligible property is approximately 84 years old and is an example of Craftsman style of architecture with Italianate influence. Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. Facts: The house was built by E. DeLarsen. The Mitchell family bought the residence in 1943. The Mitchells have long'been established within the community. Ellsworth's father established Mitchell and Son Plumbing in 1938 in Upland and the business continues under Ellsworth's children. Fin_ din-0 55: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use, which was once common, but is now rare. Facts: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and vineyard houses. B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: • Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed landmark are unusual, significant, or uniquely effective. Item A-16 HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT LD2002-00003, LA2002-00003, MA 2002-00001 —AZIZI LAW CENTER November 13, 2002 Page 4 Fact/s: The construction materials and engineering methods recall the use of details and craftsmanship that was once common, but now is rare. The Mitchell residence is a two-story rectangular structure of craftsman styling with Italianate influence. The roof is medium gable with red tile, exposed eaves, and knee braces in gable end. The siding is stucco. Second-story windows are single, rectangular pane with wood lintel and sill. Windows on the lower level have transoms with leaded glass. The front door is wood with leaded glass panels. A front arcade with a roof sundeck and castellation is present, continuing around the west side of the structure. Multiple French windows open out onto the second-story deck. Findin 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual. Facts: The gable roof, exposed eaves, and gable braces add to the beauty of the proposed landmark. They are not common features that are typically found today. C. Neighborhood and Geoawhic Setting: Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Fact/s: The Mitchell residence is a two-story rectangular structure of craftsman styling with Italianate influence. In general, the architectural style enhances the historic character of the City. D. Landmark Alteration: The proposed landmark alteration meets the following criteria established in Chapter 22.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: Findina 1: The action proposed is consistent with the purpose of this Ordinance. Facts: The landmark alteration, as presented, will enhance and promote continued use of the Mitchell residence. Finding 2: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or value of a historic nature. Facts: The proposed restoration and rehabilitation is architecturally compatible and will enhance the continued use of the Mitchell residence. The rehabilitation will follow the Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines for Rehabilitation. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. Item A-17 HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT LD2002-00003, LA2002-00003, MA 2002-00001 -AZIZI LAW CENTER November 13, 2002 • Page 5 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission adopt the attached resolutions recommending City Council approval of Landmark Designation LD2002-00003 and Resolution of Approval for Landmark Alteration Permit LA2002-00003 and recommend, by minute action, to the City Council for the Mills Act Agreement MA2002-00001. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DM/mlg Attachments: Exhibit"A"- Site Location Map Exhibit"B"- Photos Exhibit"C"- Agreement Schedule, List of Improvements Draft Resolution of Approval for Landmark Designation LD2002-00003 Draft Resolution of Approval for Landmark Alteration Permit LA2002-00003 Item A-18 _LJ L11 Q FOOTHILL BLVD. 0 SUBJECT SITE EXHIBIT A Item A-19 Mitchell—De Larsen • BUILDING • • SURVEY BUILDING A (MAIN RESIDENCE) i .fir _vr L '-n n y�, • •u':^ gip..:>. 10211 FOOTHILL Rancho Cucamonga Planning . 00 Page I • . Mitchell—De Larsen Complt— BUILDING • • SURVEY SUILDING C (WORKER COTTAGES) �r• �� � 't: �� k LLd mss.. ��•!r.° .++�Q�i7'`fl� i1�yj' t` ��- i!i:'t`"[f h� '�t��r �- ./ / 10211 FOOTHILL BLVD Mitchell —De Larsen Comple,. BUILDING PHOTO SURVEY BUILDING B (GARAGE) RmSIX r� ` 7r 10211 FOOTHILL BLVD. C A -� - V Efl r, Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 9/12/2002 Page 2 of 4 Z Mitchell — De Larsen Comple— BUILDING • • SURVEY (DILAPIDATEDBUILDING D •TTAGE—UNSAFE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION REQUESTED) jf eF= • T���`� � -�� /�4 f�'��It iY Ti` ^—.. !j .�� • ..Ea.L di - ��. ..IIIc 10211 FOOTHILL • Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division • 11 City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission MILLS ACT AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENTAL: (To be completed by the Applicant) Please list the improvements which are intended to take place over the next 10 years. List them in order of owner's priority. YEAR IMPROVEMENT 2002 Make Tenant improvements 2003 Install irrigation system 2004 Remove trellis install new trellis 2005 Remove existing garage/ Construction new garage 2006 Paint existi 2007 Remove walnut tree/ Install new landscaping 2008 Construct new 4000 square feet./Commercial building 2009 Remove the dilapidated cotta e B ildi 2010 Construct new 4000 square foot Commercial Building 2011 Install new Windows in existing building OWNER CERTIFICATION vs :..: . I certify that I am presently the legal owner of the subject property. Further, I acknowledge the supplemental information on this form will be used as an exhibit attached to the Mills Act Agreement. ^ Date: 4113A92- Signature: Exhibit "C" ItemA-24 T H E C I T Y O F QAN C C . UCAMON G December 19, 2002 Soheila Azizi 8325 Haven Avenue, Suite 110 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00806 - OFFICE CONVERSION AT 10213 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Dear Ms Azizi: The Minor Development Review process for the above-described project has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the following findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and cooperation during this review process. Findings 1. The proposed office conversion project is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The proposed office conversion project is in accordance with the objectives of the Development Code and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. 3. The proposed office conversion project,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. The proposed office conversion project will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 5. The project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 6. The site and associated improvements have been designated as a Local Historic Landmark and a Landmark Alteration Permit has been approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. 7. The subject Minor Development Review consists of phased development of the site wherein full street improvements will be installed and structural additions will be provided on-site. Conditions This project is approved subject to the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Mayor William J.Alexander0 _ Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams Councilmember Rex Gutierrez A Jack Lam,AICP, City Manager E7 T I ).Box 807 • Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 • (909) 477-2700 • FAX (909) 477-2849 www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us Item A-25 I I SOHEILA AZIZI MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00806-APPROVAL LETTER December 19, 2002 Page 2 Planning Division: 1. A Tree Removal Permit application shall be submitted for review by the City Planner prior to removal of any Code applicable trees on-site. I 2. All exterior modifications shall be made to resemble, as much as possible,building materials and architecture as originally used. Engineering Division: 1. The following improvements shall be provided with the associated phase of project implementation: • Phase I: Demolish the existing drive approach on Foothill Boulevard and build an interim asphalt drive approach. Construct a drive and parking lot;apply for Caltrans(if applicable)approval of a permanent drive approach,construct curb and gutter,per City standards and procedures where the drive approach is being removed. Phase II: Build the permanent, concrete drive approach. The permanent drive approach will be constructed to City standards, be of the commercial type, 35 feet in width, per City Standard Drawing 101 C. Phase III: Expand the office space on-site with new building construction. Construct the ultimate street improvements along the entire frontage,to City standards. They include the remaining curb and gutter,sidewalk, landscaped parkway,including trees,and one 16,000 Lumen HPSV streetlight. Existing 'No Parking' signs shall be protected or replaced as required. 2. The owner shall provide an irrevocable offer to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for right-of-way to the ultimate 120-foot street width. 3. A real property improvement contract and lien agreement shall be made between the property owner and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to ensure the construction of the ultimate street improvements described herein. A copy of this contract,with parties and details not filled in,is attached for your information. 4. Obtain drainage easements over properties to the south or substantiate that this development will not increase flows towards the existing residential properties. 5. Construct curb and gutter,per City standards and procedures,between the existing curb and gutter and the new drive approach. 6. The Foothill Boulevard median island shall not be opened to accommodate the new drive approach. 7. Street trees installed with Phase III improvements shall be planted according to the "Street Tree Requirement Form.' Item A-26 SOHEILA AZIZI MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00806-APPROVAL LETTER ® December 19;2002 Page 3 8. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities on the opposite side of Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits for additional office space (Phase III improvements).The fee shall be one-half of the City-adopted unit amount times 168 feet,the length of the project's frontage. Please refer to the °Existing Overhead Utility" handout attached and note its submittal requirements. 9. Foothill Boulevard parkway improvements, including street trees and sidewalk,shall 1conform to the Foothill Boulevard Districts guidelines outlined in the Development Code. 10. Any proposed work within the State right-of-way shall conform to Caltrans (if applicable) standards and specifications, and will require a Caltrans Encroachment Permit. 11. The following items are applicable to all phases. Street improvement plans, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed in the public rights-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's office. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to the issuance of a City construction permit. Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits. ® This decision shall be final following a ten-day appeal period beginning with the date of this letter. Appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by a$62 appeal fee. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact Larry Henderson at(909)477-2750, Monday through Thursday, from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Sincerely, PLANNING DEPARTMENT Brad Buller City Planner BB:DMfjc Attachment: Standard Conditions cc: Rosalyn Interlicchica, Office Spec. II Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Item A-27 O THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF ;CHO CONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 11, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California FF I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell_ Vice Chairman Fletcher Munoz_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca _ II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to rive minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA C O JUNE 11, 2014 Page 2 EE:: III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Approval of minutes dated May 28, 2014 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMNIISSION._ The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. B. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19532-J.E.GUZMAN FOR SMASH, LLC-A request to subdivide a parcel of about 77,028 square feet (1.77 acre), that is currently developed with two (2) commercial buildings, into two (2) parcels of 49,078 square feet and 27,950 square feet(Parcels 1 and 2, respectively)within the General Industrial(GI)District located at 8545 Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 0229-141-15. Related file: Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00580. This action is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 - Minor Land Divisions. V. ' COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC.PRESERVATION.AND PLANNING COMMISSION VI. ADJOURNMENT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL IMMEDIATELYADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP TO BE HELD IN THE RAINS ROOM TO DISCUSS PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00252. 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee,hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 5, 2014, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WI JUNE 11, 2014 Page 3 10—If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at(909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. ® It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at • www.CityofRC.us VicinityMap Historic Preservation and PlanningCommission Meeting JUNE 119 2014 C O O ' a V = CL o ifft c --.OLM=9"!7"' OF 19th St ♦ Base Line Base Line J Church Church Foothill o Foothill N i Arrow EB o Arrow C o J mey t 8th OCi o �. o C 6th W � 6th t -:WD. Y B 4th � _ = g 4th 7k Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Item A: Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated May 28, 2014 Item B: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19532 r • • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE MINUTES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 28, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL To ORDER 71 • Pledge of Allegiance 700 Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz X Wimberly A Oaxaca X II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not pre viously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None ® III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HIST ORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Item A-1 k R HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES HO MAY 28, 2014 Page 2 A. Approval of regular meeting minutes dated April 23, 2014 B. Approval of adjourned meeting (workshop) minutes dated April 23, 2014 C. RECOMMENDATION TO QUITCLAIM VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS FOR LOT 15 OF TRACT MAP 9324, ALONG CARNELIAN STREET, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET SOUTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD—APN: 1061-671-28. RELATED FILE: DRC2014-00030. D. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Munoz, carried 4 -0-1 (Wimberly absent) to adopt the Consent Calendar as presented. IV. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONMUSSION. . E. ORAL UPDATE TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ON THE RESTORATION OF THE CUCAMONGA SERVICE STATION LOCATED AT 9670 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD—APN: 0208-153-05. Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner, introduced Mr. Gonzalez, President of Route 66 ICER and Joe Ramos the architect on the project. Mr. Anthony Gonzalez gave a brief summary(Powerpoint presentation on file)of the history of the acquirement of the gas station and its subsequent preservation and repairs. He said the community is excited about what is being done. Joe Ramos, the architect, stated Ms. Nakajima has been excellent to work with. He said volunteers came from as far away as Australia and Chicago. He said they worked with Ms. Nakajima and the Building Official to obtain all the proper permits. He said engineering services has been the greatest costs. He said some services such as trash haul away, window installation, stucco, engineering etc. was provided for free by professionals. He said they have received discounts on materials. He said site work and water service is the next big challenge. He said the gas station in front will be a gathering/visitors center to sell items and the rear area will be a museum with restored cars, equipment, tools etc. Vice Chairman Fletcher said it is amazing and he is happy and encouraged to see the progress and that they have so many people enthused about the project. Commissioner Munoz thanked the folks that have donated time and services. He said you Item A-2 1 r I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES &NCW MAY 289 2014 oNM Page 3 could all want one of these buildings forever but until people donate: it can't really happen. He said it is great to see how it is coming to fruition with all the community participation. Commissioner Oaxaca said what they are doing is a real model for historic preservation. He said there is a new generation that is learning what it means and to appreciate the significance of the old Route 66. Chairman Howdyshell commended them for their leadership, work and the great report. She commented on the big Teddy Bear and asked of its significance. Mr. Gonzalez reported that a dedicated volunteer had the idea to place a visual reminder each week to keep the visual aspect of the gas station interesting. The report was received and filed. V. PUBLIC HEARINGSAPLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014- 00205 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A supplement to Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) amending Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to clarify definitions, administrative procedures and correct prior errors and omissions. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). It was noted that this item was carried forward from the last meeting and re-advertised because there was no quorum and therefore no action or formal continuance could be taken. Vice Chairman Fletcher asked where were microbreweries were previously allowed. He also asked about regulations regarding closeout sales, going out of business sales and related flags and banners. Ms. Nakamura said that it will be permitted by right but any tasting operations will require a Conditional Use Permit. She said previously they were a manufacturing use but did not ® allow for Castings. She said they were primarily in Industrial Park and General industrial zones. But those with a restaurant use are allowed all throughout our commercial zones. She said this is entirely a new use. With respect to the closeout signage, she said temporary signs are allowed 90 days in the calendar year and it is still limited to that— 1 .sign Item A-3 l 0 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Am o MAY 289 2014 Page 4 per business. She said other remedies may occur in the future. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said we cannot regulate them on content but if they falsely advertising, then it could be an unfair business practice and would be a separate cause of action someone could bring against them. Vice Chairman Fletcher asked for more regulations for this type of signage because of the appearance of it. Commissioner Munoz.asked about the water budget. Ms. Nakamura said it relates to a state regulation from 2008. She noted there are 2 calculations and they primarily apply to new commercial and residential development. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing and hearing none, closed the public hearing. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Oaxaca, carried 4-0-1, (Wimberly absent) to adopt the resolution 14-15 recommending approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014- 00205 as presented by staff and to.forward it and the environmental assessment to the City Council for final action. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19505 - ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC - A request to subdivide a 0.29 acre parcel into two lots for a site located on the northeast comer of 24th Street and Center Avenue in the Low(L) Residential Development District;APN: 0209-122-01. Related File: Variance DRC2014-00112. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2014-00112-ROYAL FALCON INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC - A request for a variance to reduce the minimum net average lot size in connection with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 located on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Center Avenue in the Low(L)Residential Development District-APN: 0209-122-01. Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing and hearing none, closed the public hearing. Commissioner Munoz said it is the highest and best use of the property and Chairman Howdyshell agreed. i Item A-4 I • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Ham+ MAY 289 2014 Page 5 Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Munoz, carried 4-0-1 (Wimberly absent) to adopt Resolution 14-16 approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19505 and Resolution 14-17 approving Variance DRC2014-00112 and to adopt the Negative Declaration of environmental impacts as presented by staff. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19518-DCT 8TH&VINEYARD, LLC: A proposal to subdivide a property comprised of nine(9)parcels with a combined area of about 375,000 square feet (8.61 acres) into three (3) parcels in conjunction with the modification of a previously approved industrial/warehouse complex in the General Industrial(GI)District located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-39 and -41 through -48. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00551 and SUBTPM18794 was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2010. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration. Related files: ® Development Review DRC2013-01118, Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152,and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01118-DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC: A review of proposed modifications to a previously approved industrial/warehouse complex and architectural review of three(3)buildings on a property of about 904,000 square feet(20.7 acres)in the General Industrial(GI)District located about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street;APNs: 0209-151-38 through-48. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00551 and SUBTPM18794 was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 12,2010. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration Related files: Development Review DRC20070- 00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-01120. K. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT DRC2013-01120 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC: A modification of Uniform Sign Program #221 for a partially constructed industrial/warehouse complex on a property of 20.7 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-38 through -48. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-0118, Development Review DRC2007-00551, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Minor Exception DRC2008-00152. ® Donald Granger, Senior Planner gave the staff repoll and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) on behalf of the project planner, Steve Fowler. Item A-5 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MH MAY 289 2014 Page 6 Commissioner Oaxaca asked where the new mitigation sound wall would run. Mr. Granger stated basically along the flood control channel for sound attenuation for the neighboring residential neighborhood. Terri Allen from DCT said this modification has found a better plan for the site and now they have 2 tenants for 2 of the 3 buildings. She said all 3 will be built at the same time. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing none, closed the public hearing. She said it is encouraging to see they have occupants for 2 of the 3 buildings. Commissioner Munoz said good to see business is coming back and supportive of changing the layout in response to the market today. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-1 (Wimberly absent) to adopt Resolution 14-18 approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19518, Resolution 14-19 approving Development Review DRC2013-01118 and Resolution 14-20 approving Uniform Sign Program Amendment DRC2013-01120 as presented by staff. VI. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION VII. ADJOURNMENT 7:55 PM If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. Item A-6 I ® HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CRr CHO MAY 289 2014 WAMONOA Page 7 The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning • Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us • Item A-7 STAFF REPORT PLANN NG DEPARTMENr Date: June 11, 2014 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CiUCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19532 - J. E. GUZMAN FOR SMASH, LLC -A request to subdivide a parcel of about 77,028 square feet (1.77 acre), that is currently developed with two (2) commercial buildings, into two (2) parcels of 49,078 square feet and 27,950 square feet (Parcels 1 and 2, respectively) within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at 8545 Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 0229-141-15. Related file: Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00580. This action is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State. CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 - Minor Land Divisions. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19532 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Apartment Complex; Medium (M) Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay) South- Equipment Rental Business; General Industrial (GI) District East - vacant; General Industrial (GI) District West - Logistics Buildings (pending construction); Heavy Industrial (HI) District A. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - Medium Residential South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - Heavy Industrial B. Site Characteristics: The project site is a commercial center with an overall area of approximately 77,028 square feet (1.77 acre) located at the southeast comer of Arrow Route and-Etiwanda Avenue at 8545 Etiwanda Avenue. The overall dimensions of the project site are approximately 284 feet (east to west) by approximately 300 feet (north to south) (Exhibit B). The commercial center, which was approved by the Planning Commission on January 9, 2008 (Related file: Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00580), is comprised of an auto service court (2,900 square foot gas station with a convenience store and carwash) and a fast food restaurant of 1,800 square feet. To the east is vacant property, while to the south is an equipment rental business. To the north is an apartment complex (Victoria Woods). To the west are the remnants of a concrete pipe manufacturing facility that is being demolished for the pending construction of two (2) logistics buildings. The zoning of the properties to • the east and south are General Industrial (GI) District. The zoning of the property to the north is Medium (M) Residential, Etiwanda Specific.Plan (South Overlay). The zoning of the property to the west is Heavy Industrial (HI) District. Item R-1 k PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19532—J. E. GUZMAN FOR SMASH, LLC June 11, 2014 Page 2 - ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant, J.E. Guzman on behalf of Smash, LLC, proposes to subdivide the subject parcel into two (2) parcels of 49,078 square feet and 27,950 square feet (Parcels 1 and 2, respectively) (Exhibit C). Following the subdivision, each of the two buildings that comprise the subject parcel will be situated on an exclusive parcel. The applicant does not propose any physical changes to the site such as modifications to the parking lot, landscaping, or vehicular access/circulation. As the site is fully developed, new construction of a building or installation of new minor improvements, such as parking lot lights, is not proposed. As the parking lot will be subdivided by the new property line, to minimize the potential for problems regarding maintenance, parking, and/or access, a condition of approval has been included in the Resolution of Approval requiring the submittal to the City applicable recorded documentation that establishes, and/or ensures the continuation of, agreements, easements, etc. for the purpose of mutual/reciprocal access, parking, and maintenance of the parking lot and associated areas within the shopping center. B. Grading, Technical, and Design Review Committees: As the project is only for the creation of a new property line on a fully developed commercial property and development of the site, i.e., grading, public improvements, and/or buildings is not proposed nor required, staff determined that a review by the Committees is not necessary. C. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315—Minor Land Divisions - as the project is a division of commercial zoned property into four or less parcels, is in conformance with the General Plan and zoning designations, no variances or exceptions are required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available, the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received. Respectfully submitted, i' Candyce B rnett Planning Director CB:MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT19532 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19532 Itam R-7 E G d WILSON AVE uxMYn -------- -- _ RIVER DR--, d G V FLE SMIRDR 3 WYAYE DR CP �. 'wF Dfl^,CEDARCPEF%DR•a I= O S 6DDow000 oP ¢�. .% T .e m i3R REIx OR Su ��� M SDR\.�OIf11pTY5- d < NSIA WAGE OR ''•- cc \on TRT: In R06FwILF:OR CNM(ENDONpp \� C ANTIFiAA1 OR r Y' d y ARENA OR D KEEXtANOOR 6RFEWMR OR d. - a 73P0 GT _ N PINS OR MIPORYad CI BAPPAE IW a BUTLER RD r,SHILOHCI '.00kING NORSE PL o. •• �, •. IOTANOR aLAFxYPO B'C �. JOHN m G : AMBER'I. -.v- HORSESHOE Cf I' L LO$OSO$ TRIPLE CR Ci CvL.6WIE uP� '':`. GOLDEN SUMMI KENTUCKY KY DER CT �' A NTERM fh M IQN711CKY DERBY Ci ....... .,BMAN ST: «,; �. a'AoraroxFDA SUMMIT AVE BANYAKST �D - E ATE �� - Sh'� IwatT• \3 C wANF 'MAgwfMIT,.--I' BLW 6PMKE DR d d SAxFP 6AOMf DR < .d.MYFAOON9 SHASTA OR § `WWTE FW CI .�d � o CT f4 a M F FFyy "(k}rIP�BAn !P ArWG �'MPmFLn ApAAN DR U• _ �dt. tOLt UR srlLl ? RwRa YN VI MwN'i rr sures WGx xwRSLN CREEK CT 9 G L ^9iM° 5GE0& r Yr v6wwFN MUBTIRSDR- VINTAGE WINOSTAP OR j BLUE GUM ' S -- #IHIGNy,jr .. C' tl�� MTA nSir Y'R!Nxn •.B6NOBN' d D/I LOSTTRYL m FDR . �, CASSAS1 FEIM 3 N,Nom" 'f'wC "N w43mf n i ti WADEN C :DR d G .. �� a, yl.+� 'C: n�x6 cry 'WIATE ADOIORY RUSTIC WLxFPOKEE RD } : �; :BON:1rn M'WDP SECRETARIAT OP CI ; gBRIWEWATERDR EEFi 3 p�.,,y: waaT wmwr a 'y Mrslf�r OUVw't 6r i:� _ i� 4 ^NNLYbult JrY ww •kn EtTBhICf e OR [r j 'T ARAPAHO RO MICKASAW.PD iFAAn � G� k h ABWCr � GRatto OR vAOIkROn �� F MUELLER CT FlSNFP p1 rywNtfaNM S AMBMaM Am rM HII5HLANU AVC '_- O ygPn N "f, aawmn Win.NORCM DR WMITESTOKE DR AAWN Ar MPO $'t.4 8G C�'IM'BkL:QPC f..NB°N' uron od,d ssN!xPNn HrweswdM E uwY.n DOGWOOD PL' a �.oEAgr d d A! ' CC T�FNUOA LnCF A6NE NSIONL FMNYCF KF :R d (yf aP'E V R N RIPIR IL PRIM ROSE PL MUNGO CT °"" a Z RMYsen NyON' 'saw d AB,su o nrtF Mi ICfOgIAN :1 'r d .1 t WA n z FALLING STAR CT AAVtaP xYMf�. g g TAMARISK OR G ,P ,ATMPAST j F r wsr F D N'm Y c �QY 8 $. .a•C cwnwPn •W t - T' ,-O tgal�x T RRN AF\Yi\ Aid j 3 ✓ MARSAUPL YaMR O t r... r) ¢ f ".- '] 'n WMxAM LWAM SPRING NIST DR d W,Y NtW �' F i, S �'SMDKI$IOXFSA L-A a 'S1 \riLc `PArfF rRrA[M n NflyRT y�.� N6n TT 54 - L-A 1 Ynwwlw Ax�1mR .•�� ¢ CASPANDEN OCT ��a•-,.r ry�FIfl1 SF LYV! !'""T EQQ CARNES?DR $b F TQM 4"N�.. .ruyn s tAnNNaR O{:4Y• rNPsa cr VISTA ST u Cor ao„F terra a NEN"a' RANCHO +Er.rn n ww c t c�"�,'OauNun nxox sr u'7Eoxh. 3 :a T _ opl� ow n'r"°Aw. CUCAMONGA � urn.BLy s.¢P§'. Z YN-Tiw 3�gg -t= �Ay, a,}j ,RsuHFFa MR1" IF stn a Los cmROS Sr c ETIWANDA tAl'\I Ti K C "`?DRY YUB'^9aP G IT.=IN Funer wwORows 3 < y to r G d YuwoxuR -g jt lni . PINHNRSTOR �. LAARERA ST IC s�jy 44 ..�ixdlf4 4 r;ry�iN= ].€ F r p s' c c- ., d A}KwDRrsoxsra�y �+Gm W VICTORIA _ ST G G Ea- i06f. I �c- ] F i f10M OR Y gt' cA1 /SNxn _ - O. y -�LWnMOT y'K��'� rro�' ,r, cEOpGE cr p Wo.!xc Gtt, "BIElOq 51 wy,G BENONA . EAYANM] g A C NII&RIFanCnrR# Pru s acawn d d I&ETIWANDA S P off.4Ss nye Fp-t U.7 ti1:\L-i-im.FN M d mxwwDE M $ N,,. JESSIE CT. G OWEN5D ROGUr FARq�DA �yB'A AYAPN4. yy i L JUFN 'aT` L� w1!IBI' �Y C" d F td:. t MAI, rvNMONr AY 4 'i• d c d 'E}. ,.ft/:. d d rcNnn M •FLFWLEr tI U14.t '.v ppy W {�9 Yaw)d gy pg UGAR RUM 5L REDWOOP DR ? S W 3, d LSI �rlw[ GAWLBIIOGE DR I:rn 'U'*- Wq, d G I. 1 G G �� 'Y CW$, ggM\t.A I[ DR" FF $e6t >E 2 G PN.ImAe WINDY GROVE DP. §s) $ LUGNID DP MRI OR NVMLDUR GRABNDM ` �I R 5 :wtTwwwA. nr11MF s M } g' BRODxAE1D 011 FDALg NDLLONTWIM dt , SArAWWT D� SHMPNDOAH OR ' L 6:UEBELL PL � - s gTp.e• � r ;' AmDA� �rWrttu � � � C '.+,HBr oRw � r �$e FPPPnf'flu Sr G k PLATEAU OR }CMEUEU ]R y �1yTaaFxm, ertu�' d G 2'RFWdy wL ,f•�(+''uJ �GRAPELAND ROUNTREE IN. BLUE CUP CT [ F ""ad. .l f-.1'viE \l+A AMN MS F '3 G ialADR$ CIIAI&U-DA y STAR TUUING Cr V, FE fLILNAWESE"wN''+'`A II w 1KRTIlWOORG S+` TAR W RAIlh {EBP RYMs d w: .. TR'Pq s W { Flre Y, Il .B CRAIG DR a � ;ANNI.PYrf g:BAONFY] �> d r ah Nj•'r F i ] aaNBNN"Dq] Srarion3 �. Vg�s{ xz"r'"U'E''= ` : d BASE LII E r' RD JE ILMN DR PflWINCE S} IT . 1 $G %90: LELEBMT IONOR d '� r ArwnbxTB CORRESPONWE PL Y HISTORIC BI'✓F' P.- d C d V '.� �', HIT ryap RMF DA'` NONTGOMEAY DR W WINE MUSEUM d-D v ONNNOE DR pNEYtT �kIEID STS KMeI �' $ •� Iv ! RUREDGE CT ¢' d : m r .IRONWOUlSi SCHUYLER Cr U'. W� MOMIC DR UHANCEOR fwr'.WLONIAL 9 + EEI ,G' TIMIFYME 6F� C iMW111 PL M•ADpNrYA �L ✓p t; C' .Wq ,y _ '= T�p� C �L NA' S LOCKE PL p �Et 1F '•. T, 'S F @? �- ,/ LOLL CONTINENTAL PL }I:YFARA6ECT OUML w'Cr 0" N, OU%BURY PL Q'. •d'• Ik N' WOODCNI CT' A C y.0. p. d AwpAxl o RHODE ISLAND 1,T RDYN os d # d It• / IBEPATWOR. CT YEA ` Y ylD N.J. NEW ENGLAND OR BART?NNONpP,� � N .,zz , TERRA°A IaraumNM d LT\ Tr• OOWNINGw �F VISTA nP. .Y.BYNIIWT RUE WAY BRIDLEWWOOP ROIMFPiFORO IR'}{� i 9UNGALDw. KyL s.W—k .�RA AMELLA E• PEN 0104 LONGMMGGWp N9lD NNr� F ALE CT y$yy$ff g� e'ARP+w FA,� NuuRM FIRM?.CT .dwA1ERBRGO%Op�.TBw _ g G OWy,,y d SPAIN6 MOUMNN Dq G NIoTB010 DP `K W, ,,y� Y j+i,.� j, .$';°SAL.,°5y .Y n., r 8 d Aug" KwLsax cREBI o' FLrd p RIVE aK'DR NC �uNTAN. '®s4v'MTO1 CANOLLWODD ST M8,'. �" OP DA 1'j"'A-C, G d sNVER RosECT d d Ik aaWcr DOWKGTOX PI slwNswrsEnP R N.repaR" w € 7`61. WY FIRLR70NE DR �. X momPY VIEW p CHESDGETI�W DR s'` �'' \ € rPILaIKnTFeG CHURCH ST - ° 9'�+ r E G --aT\" RE VALLEY BR .3�tr�Aw Tw xaArw RSTER o - - - L MILLERAVE:. GARDENS VILA-.v„n• VILi.Ii.!K d �` I• idy P,`.R:C PAliti AN ST < -VAN'RtQLAYI M.C.A. V PROJECT SITE < 3•• dCLARET ft p YM YENE;D DA AIN ST< jS C < DR� f'r a16W GMW6E0R i CHERVIL SI B�� 3 GAROM . `OPS �I• - S \i 1't U! ORIA a) RANCHO SAN ANTONIO ._....._..._. .. $ . MEDICAL CEDARBRDOK PL / IF CENTER 'fi. - HISTORIC m Wxfsr ;66- FOOTHILL BLVD ' FOO1lYLL r ; PTUssr `'fi`�g' CROBSING CHESTNUT AVE I'SEBASTWNI WAY: W NY AVE TATLLENIUM LT foUYr,Lt L.Y'ruwvv'� 1'I'IlT` T'rRk 4 W � 1.-_-.- '.7FB&RCN OF •...::t I ' CUCAMON61 4 ADULT SPO9'S COMPLEX x ANIMAL sSHE{TER ..9oa - .. _ ARROW ROUTE � g T ACOMA OR T' - f3 M s � s ERSEY Al.VD WHITMAN AVE O tirU's I',4HK DSIHRO Item B-3 EXHIBIT A rHST 1 Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19532 - k r ' r Arrow Route C t --- _ , Projectmm Site40 `g 1 j r 1 � ''had y a. • � �,� „� EXHUNT B • ,_�-. ,. — _ ___ PERR13 (e>tt�ow tton� AVENUE styli s--- - ---- �-% --'--`--'- -.�'�-..-s�"� �-- � -J4Z - - --- -----' ----- -—s --- - •--- ...-..,.y-.-.H.�.-��..-_���- . 1 I -�_'--T-._----r- T--'._'-----'--_- i w IAS 1 31W TT - -- �� —--- -.- AN EASMW FOR SIFTS NNNIN7! L.•0E{C comiE- _ - _ -Ev - I INCI rtAL F IIPOSf3,IEC.OEC.3� _—_ - - - :mR NST.I m—,o .ox —---- '. BE Dm CATED To n,E an cF me a_YA ���� ' `� E RAI CU0YgN91 I ', M 9011'00'E 41.2r---' 1.2S FAS"NC R/w — / •s.�- siu.'? / '}•� "�• A-21'31'2Y C2 N 0O14'0C E IM1� N X1/'00'E @I.� ,,R c7N[OP=.TY''i a-.'\ EK U.*Vx 'AREA C1 R-3i05 T-7.15' C2TA-217919,R-3E05' 'IIF=�11[ „� O03sv*r SNxk L-1472' �" drl I,�1 .4,.•. ,_ = -_��_____ -� _ _ E+UAOY PE AIA �� Ii - >• r_nux rnr. _. -- .. dS .,i II 11111 .a ! - I'._ 1 I�-�.�v +FX STAvM Wk. —Ex w1c romAn u i. I I \. �,...._ Ex cAc °t'wr�r4Er.Ac PAvxc.•..__2 ,J I"' ��9f I I I ff� :r3•^ ,.,� f` --•i�'. �"_7 �I I' DL AC PAVM N REMPROM EASOAENT NOM CV UE i I rr YROi05ED REEFROM EAM"T FOR N(tiE55,EGRESS Y JAND MG10E,I7AL AREP056 FOR THE SUI OF PARCT35 o s• I yb6� —�t Its 1�9 F i *tea Ee: 119 Pl; �� au C 1 AW 2.M RE vREpARM R.oyHM g- III I I � �--_Sp_. � _.yp_ _•- �I � �;__ _ d I Ie Ex a-STORE roREUUN � I I � ((FF-1155.29)(FF-1155.29) (Df=,==_o04 WT LIME ft 1 � C1 PWhR 111'l' '17 I , 'T �''"� i 4.9;078 5F _ i —— — , 5 ;,a : L1-- i t Lo S I 1 z 1 ,115 1 LI E3 iyy..' _ _�C.. --.- ___:_# I I I 1 .--------_-__-- .r'? e; !, PiA56- e-A N 1 1 I s I \- a„ ; Ez z o Q4 I, cu(wASH I-. a f 11 ; ( LOT 1.6 /I a "' 1 I r To REMAIN eg I't Y'a �e (FF-„5.114) _ {�I I TR. 2102 Ex Ac= ' I =zz Io ox I 1_.. 3�. .. I I• h N N r 1 a , ,'. _ N W24W E 19731•sI I __ _ I 1 U. 1 I IFx PAN,11C5 - UTR so-,'N W2r4E 05A' 1 w e_ As I PARRY. _- - a ,� � -�---Io Ixt (?aPANrncsl .L Ih _a= x PNnn4.sr, I � ;�� �� 5 ; _ ! y6� Ib ”-- N i _Io. Ills y p 4� d d IY PARCEL 2 PAT9_.� _ LCL., --_ I , r l I d © c v x 6N E )x PAI I 27,950 SF �____= Ex ACPAMC =___+ r; : :�_ v Graphic Scale Ilr'{a! :_..__. a C� _ q >,o zo 40 --�.s r+_ ,T�(* ___o' P-� ( ',..- I a (Ir reit) �� J E,At ami 1 I DL�,- I Inch= 20 Et. N � - I caxc rAuc - r 00.90)I A• 3800' _.-� _---... ---- -_ r P1rmEil �` [Y, _ EX aAru,:FR+a, /R N OPtC21-E Z610S� 313AS' Er..w.wc irtai FEK_= _ 3 smm T EASE1R11E N FAVOR / OF SOUREAI CAI EDEM .P Y NILE EASEMENT rUR PMnjc5 NfY.REL MOV.19.3010 As r.iri-.': T-i-a DWM AND NOOfATAL KIRIT I NST.VMD-0170085 ': .. IEL N BR ON,K 959,OA VACANT i.ANT) RESOLUTION NO. 14-21 ® A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19532, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A PARCEL OF ABOUT 77,028 SQUARE FEET (1.77 ACRE), THAT IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO(2)COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS, INTO TWO(2)PARCELS OF 49,078 SQUARE FEET AND 27,950 SQUARE FEET(PARCELS 1 AND 2, RESPECTIVELY)WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 8545 ETIWANDA AVENUE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 0229-141-15. A. Recitals. 1. J.E. Guzman, on behalf of Smash, LLC, filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19532, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of June 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 11, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a commercial center located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue at 8545 Etiwanda Avenue; and b. The shopping center has an overall area of approximately 77,028 square feet(1.77 acre) and overall dimensions of the project site are approximately 284 feet(east to west)by approximately 300 feet (north to south); and C. The shopping center is comprised of an auto service court(2,900 square foot gas station with a convenience store and carwash) and a fast food restaurant of 1,800 square feet; and d. The zoning of the properties to the east and south are General Industrial (GI) District. The zoning of the property to the north is Medium (M) Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan(South Overlay). The zoning of the property to the west is Heavy Industrial (HI) District; and e. The application contemplates the subdivision of the subject parcel into two (2) parcels of 49,078 square feet and 27,950 square feet (Parcels 1 and 2, respectively); and f. The applicant does not propose any physical changes to the site such as modifications to • the parking lot, landscaping, or vehicular access/circulation. As the site is fully developed, new construction of a building or installation of new minor improvements such as parking lot lights are not proposed. Itam R_A t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-21 SUBTPM19532-J. E. GUZMAN FOR SMASH, LLC June 11, 2014 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed subdivision is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed project is to subdivide the property into two parcels and is consistent with the development district of the project site; and b. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed project is to subdivide the property into two parcels-no development of the site is proposed; and C. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed subdivision meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315-Minor Land Divisions - as the proposal is to subdivide the property into four parcels or less, is in conformance with the General Plan and zoning designations, no variances or exceptions are required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available, the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. In addition,there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption,and based on its own independent judgment,concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision to subdivide a Parcel of approximately 77,028 square feet (1.77 acre), that is currently developed with two (2) commercial buildings, into two (2) parcels of 49,078 square feet and 27,950 square feet(Parcels 1 and 2, respectively)within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at 8545 Etiwanda Avenue-APN: 0229-141-15. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, the Victoria Planned Community, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall submit to the City applicable recorded documentation that establishes, and/or ensures the continuation of, agreements, easements, etc. for the purpose of mutual/reciprocal access, parking, and maintenance of the parking lot and associated areas within the shopping center. Statements noting these agreements, easements, etc. shall be included on the Final Map. Itcm R-7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-21 SUBTPM19532-J. E. GUZMAN FOR SMASH, LLC June 11, 2014 • Page 3 4) Any proposals for development within the project site shall require the review and approval of the City's Planning Department prior to construction and/or installation. 5) A reciprocal agreement is required for the maintenance and use of the on-site fire protection (fire hydrant). 6) All Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00580 shall apply. 7) All signs shall comply with Chapter 17.74(Sign Regulations for Private Property) of the Development Code and Uniform Sign Program #213. No additional ground or mounted signs shall be allowed by virtue of this subdivision. Engineering Services Department 1) Provide reciprocal access easement ensuring access between parcels and cross lot drainage easement. 2) The final parcel map shall be submitted for review and approval. Plan check fees will be required and determined at the time of submittal. a) Monumentation cash deposit and printing fees will be required prior to approval of the map. Building and Safety Services (Grading) Department 1) Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map the applicant shall provide to the Building Official (or his designee) a copy of the approved project Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions(CC&Rs) describing the inspection and maintenance responsibilities of the storm water treatment devices (WQMP BMPs)as required per the current adopted MS4 Permit. The Building Official(or his designee)shall file the approved CC&Rs in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared for City of Rancho Cucamonga PMT2008-03298 on file in the Engineering Services Department, Environmental Programs Division. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman • ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary Item R-8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-21 SUBTPM19532—J. E. GUZMAN FOR SMASH, LLC June 11, 2014. Page 4 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutiori was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of June 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Itcm R-Q COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBTPM19532 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: J.E. GUZMAN FOR SMASH, LLC LOCATION: 8545 ETIWANDA AVENUE-APN: 0229-141-15 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • A. General Requirements completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14-21 or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees.as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption -$50. X 1 Item B-10 s Project No..SUBTPM19532 Completlon Date B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. D. SHOPPING CENTERS 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. -/—� 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 2 Item R_11 ;Lo j SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RANCHO JUNE 11, 2014 CUCAMONGA NAME COMPANY ADDRESS/EMAIL AN NG , Tentative Parcel Map �"`IF°RN'A SUBTPM19532 A request to subdivide a parcel of about 1 .77 acres, that is currently developed with two commercial buildings, into two parcels of 49,078 square feet and 27,950 square feet (Parcels 1 and 2, respectively) in the General Industrial (GI) District located at 8545 Etiwanda Avenue; APN: 0229-141 -15. i moll � GCHQ Project B 'ALIFORNU N • The project site is a commercial center with an overall area of about 1 .77 acres with overall dimensions of about 284 feet (east to west) by about 300 feet (north to south); • The center is comprised of a gas station of 2,900 square feet and a fast food restaurant of 1 ,800 square feet. The gas station includes a convenience store and carwash ; • The center was approved by the Planning Commission on January 9, 2008 following the review of Conditional Use Permit D RC2006-00580. i CHO Project Description UCAMONGA ALIFORNU. ` • The applicant, J . E. Guzman on behalf of Smash, LLC, proposes to subdivide the subject parcel into two parcels of 49,078 square feet (Parcel 1 ) and 27,950 square feet (Parcel 2); • Following the subdivision, the gas station and the fast food restaurant will be on separate parcels — Parcel 1 and 2, respectively; • The applicant does not propose any physical. changes to the site such as modifications to the parking lot, landscaping , or vehicular access/circulation , or any new construction . Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19532 F � ra i . P f Arrow RAE - �.... _ Jt- uj '4 �f .I 4 - •-- - —T — - Y.^w1 721 - �` - I I w enrec _41 '; I7 G90rt fOR SIE[R NBwEY t - a: �:-'-__—— __ � �••�— _-��— RR F Z I. ,..x.•>„ n"'.a4 1 47T.1.6.7.4r t 1 I I I?k I I I.•p. .n. -- Ir1lS Cob ,�, II— ./.� - - � ..3T+ .'=r•Wc Y_ .'.,` i a $ , r l PARCEL r u'I 078 8F --- I �a� Ilrl % Rp ri WWW E I sI �I I I .:,��` '�•.L_ —ml� I �3T —�ti j r•'� �I +if='.� ram�E-i -- - ----- t c. ------------ F _ a. 44 z „ PARCEL 2 WPI l = 27,950 SF _ c In m Ia re ea IL I ��.� L'X'�='=�'* v.�x..Iroc•ate. 1 �I—. J _- — -- _ .— -• II ERN4P E 7&10' OF Ix ' 1511 5 Gt�1011 M FMR Y IEA41�11 tW AllI7EI All N QYf0111& ,——111. p7g110 NE E4LElrt�l PIIPOES� Y¢.m 10.mm i Ec E E(8�1.tR E6.LLR l'A('atdT i.A}.1V TR. 2102, !DT -L27 I n r n - 0220-1, z-o-onn I 'IY M. R. d.;11—::� # IND SI'MA_ZONL ! f y Iy I TNT1t 4Tzr.M 7k)xF. II T A I A. Y. N. 0229 141 13 U ow I I Ex YETK Enc I I II .I I I I I I I I ! will.c RANCHO Environmental Assessment CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA • Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City's environmental guidelines. • The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions — as the project is a division of commercial zoned property into four or less parcels. T moll RANCHO Correspondence CUCAMONGA CAL1FO1 NUX • This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper; • The property was posted ; • Notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site; • No correspondence or comments have been received . i CHO . ..... Staff Recommendation UCAMONc A ALIFORNIA Staff Recommends Approval of: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19532 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. wk. j }. .� Y � f , Adr AMP- p s MALVERN = '� Rl u • ff IV 1 P , ♦ � KINLOCK' AkV .•. .RSI —sr k', ., v.,:ai 4IWT. j t is r f r � +- � a F R + S4 Yf. ?y ,i lz i�'�ri ql • { Y6 t _ � +1��j��' It ir i •� , ' , w............... ................................. ....._..... 2131N30 �r,\ 'l r .... ..... • } I '4 �.. . k. Ilk ............... 4 N `x4 lk yr' l` WIN INN ,M\% 't it .............. A{ : 4441 `\ NNO \ J o LL It MOOINN s4 �® : cN XN dN\ uj W\IMuj .N i r . 4 4�� , ,� s , . ooeAe j �4 20 AMM [PROFEEMONAL DFRICE BULMHO OE A. RAMO AIA 9 Architect 10213 FOMMLL BLW0.0 [RANCHO CUCAMOH(mo CA 91730 Architecture/Planning Interior/CADD 2075 N. First Ave. Upland, Ca". 91784 Office (909) 981-3171 FOOTHILL BLVD. AERIAL MAP CODE ANALYSIS PROJECT DATA j ramo.architect @ verizon,net OCCUPANT LOAD CALCULATIONS SOHEILA AZIZI HUR PROPERTY OWNER 10213 FOOTHILL BLVD., TOTAL BUILDING AREA : 8, 400 S.F. APPLICANT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 OCCUPANT LOAD: 8,400/1 00 = 84 PHONE. (909) 484-9992 No.C 19076 REN,06/30/15 PROJECT ADDRESS: 10213 FOOTHILL BLVD., PER SECTION 1015 2010 CBC , TABLE 1015.1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 OF C UTFAIME EXIT ACCESS DOORWAYS ARE REQUIRED. % EXIT OR EXIT ACCESS DOORWAY SHALL BE UNOBSTRUCTED AT ALL TIMES. APN- 0208-331-070 FIRE SPRINKLES REQUIRED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: PORTION OF SECTION 11 CUCAMONGA FRUIT LAND to 167,33'FL 1, 25 ACRE (54,450 S.F,) COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL 100 FT. (MAX) LOT RE 0: EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE 300 FT, + 100 FT, BALCONY INCREASE =400 FT. DEN(E) �E PROPOSED BUILDING:543 S.F. CONSTRUCTION: TYPE V–B PLUMBING FIXTURES PER SECTION 412.3 2010 CPC, TABLE 4-3 FIRE SPRINKLES: 'YES :K410 KOCK TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD 84 (42 MALES, 42 FEMALES) .. ................. ..... PLUMBING FIXTURES MALE MALE FEMALE FEMALE ZONING: CO REQUIRED PROVIDED REQUIR, PROVID. B -- — — - - — LU WATER CLOSETS 3 3 LL: 2 2 OCCUPANT LOAD: cf) URINALS LLJ LAVATORY 85 ZONE "CO GROSS BUILDING AREA: 8,492 S.F. OFFICE AREA: 7,700 S.F. NUMBER OF STORIES: 2 . ..... . BUILDING HEIGHT. 25 FT. (40 ft. TOWER) 0 ......... CM TING OFFICE BUILDING: EXIS C14 ...... S�2 ><Uj TOTAL AREA: 4008 S.F. 2t STORIES: 2 LA_ B OCCUPANT LOAD: 41 TRASH 11 13 ENCLOS. FOOTHILL BLVD. BUILDIN FOOTPRINT: (E)DAY CARE CL (E) BUILDINGS: 3,192 S.F. C-D ......... BUILDING: 4,200 S,F. TOTAL FOOTPRINT. 7. 392 S.F, FL ANDSCAPE AREA: 10, 550 S.F. (20%)--------- ------------- 16 L _A6 A6 -1 RMO W&F. PARKING: LO REQUIRED: (8492 + 4008) =12500 /250 =50 w HE am ODY.PMO PROVIDED: 51 F Cf) ACCESSIBLE PARKING: REQUIRED –2 ZONL UU 0 PROVIDED –2(E)L _J L–SICIRY z..........IBUILDING�.5 ------- 4008 S.F. 0 U. B)2 Cm R/C VICINITY MAP< > Z A< -j 00 i0 LNUT tLO z::\ RE qARAE �L) LE/ 0 0 L0 VO4 S.If 0 0 W�, LL< Uj LL IC11) 0 z z 0 L Ir Revision Schedule No. Description/Date BY ......... ........................ oothill BI, d'--o a.......(E)XAK EE w (E) TREE TO REMAIN,IPROJ.No 00 DATE 02-28-2014 00 0 SCALE AS NOTED 1w C6 DRAWN BY (E) 6' HIGH BLOCK WALL ......(E) Ok�TRE CHECKED BY JAR (E) 6' HIGH BLOCK WALL' U SHEET No. EXISTING SITE PLAN 0 y N o t h R IPROPOSED CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN ZONE PROPOSED ILLUSTRATIVE LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1"=40'N rs r t h SCALE: 1"=40' Ami 00 .. .. ...... SCALE: I 4o' gg 0� OF SHEETS 7�'rT - .moi^►AIAIAlA1�1►�1 � I I 1 1 ,.I�IAIAIAI�IAIAIAIRjAIA►MI►., vv; � � �� I - •�I�I�i�iAiAi�i�iAi�iAi�iNi�i�i�i�i�i�iNi�iAli�►h1�.._ ` � � 1 1 , �, EMI (II�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII \\ , ® \� \ I ��� \\ \ \ \ \ all as Is NINIMM",IN — — III MEN aM L TI 2215 s.f. law ma 0 oil a m a oil IIII MIMI _ I , gill � • I� 1 ' 1 ��I 1�� ..i��+.�,'�i�7i.1.��i.��.�1 .-,i��I.�i��L��i.!*�r�'.d�.����'�.����'..'►_��fa.R�� �1-�.._ ��II� � ,�AI�IAIAI�tAhl ��II� � � \ �. � � r.,�lAlAlAlAj�j�jAjAiAjAjAIA AjR�jwjAlhin, I� �; � � � � _�a1���iAiA�A�AiA�A�A�AlA1�lA►��AIA�MIA�A�AIA����1,._ \ EIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIA IN \\ \� � IIIIIIFIIIIIIilllilllllilllllll \a � � —_ ': `; _ ` \ \ ,.�.\ � i 1 Nixon 0 as ;b r r V \`t e f4l{diY ,f_ dna:. .. : ...... . .... \...a\. � a. .,_. �� \......... \ ,.\ \ • ..\... \.Fa. ,. V 111011 \ • a; Revision Schedule Date +s st c \ � 3 t. \ a , ..... \. .row.... \. v v.. . .; ..... ..v.. i. .......ate.. lF..... .v .. .,.. _.. ,..�yA. .. .. ._ .. .. ._...,.v. ....A.. �_. DATE 02-28-2014 INN ... ...:::::.. .... ... .>. .. . v. .