Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-09-24-Agenda Packet-PC-HPC gTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHOWORKSHOP OF CONGA THE PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 - 7:00 PM* Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center ****RAINS ROOM**** 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California L. ' CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Wimberly_ Vice Chairman Oaxaca Munoz_ Howdyshell_ Fletcher II ... PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to rive minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises,or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION A. PRE APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00613—ALTA RANCHO—A review of the site plan and elevations for a proposed 170-unit multi-family apartment complex and 6,000 square feet of retail on 5.27 acres of land within the Mixed Use (MU) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District(FBOD), located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue -APNs: 1077-601-13 and 1077-601-14. PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 HO Page 2 ON IV. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee,hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 18, 2014, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at(909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." . Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 -JAXCHO Page 3 MONGA documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us VicinityMap Planning Commission Workshop September 24, 2014 L : I ' .m. CC 'Q i! . • C f = H U I tC MOE19th St A Base Line Base Line A J Church Church Foothill A Foothill N i Arrow • Arrow J4 rsey t 8th 00, ooG w i CJ Z4tAh , C 6th W .0 y Y r _ _ 4th 7E Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Charnber^: 10600 Civic Center I 9 Item A: Pre-Application Review of dRC2014-00613 STAFF REPORT ri PLANNING,DEPARTM NT DATE: September 24, 2014 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C;UCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PRE APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00613 —ALTA RANCHO —A review of the site plan and elevations for a proposed 170-unit multi-family apartment complex and 6,000 square feet of retail on 5.27 acres of land within the Mixed Use (MU) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District (FBOD), located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1077-601-13 and 1077-601-14. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission provide input and direction to guide the applicant for a Mixed Use development proposal. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residential; Low Residential (L) District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Commercial (Restaurant and Office); Commercial Office (CO) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District (FBOD) is East - Multi-Family Apartments; Mixed-Use (MU) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District (FBOD) West - Commercial and Single-Family and Multi-Family Residential; Commercial Office (CO) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District (FBOD) and Low Residential (L) District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Mixed Use (Subarea 4) North - Low Residential (2 —4 dwelling units per acre) South - General Commercial East - Mixed Use (Subarea 4) West - General Commercial and Low Residential (2 —4 dwelling units per acre) C. Site Characteristics: The project site is comprised of two parcels that make up a generally rectangular-shaped project area situated at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue. The southerly half of the site contains a liquor store (Shop & Go), a short term hotel, and a closed night club (Rock the Keys). The northerly half of the site is vacant. The property to the north contains single-family residential; to the east is the Villaggio on Route 66 apartment complex (DRC2006-00633) and an existing single-family residential house that has been used for commercial uses; to the south is a multi-tenant office building and restaurant (Kick Back Jacks); and to the west is commercial (Xtreme Autosound) and an older multi-family residential complex. The site slopes generally from north to south, and has no landscape features except for a few trees located near the north property line and throughout the existing parking areas. Item A-1 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00613 —ALTA RANCHO September 24, 2014 Page 2 BACKGROUND: On February 13, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 and Development District Amendment DRC2006-00634 amending the land use district from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU) for 17.0 acres located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Center Avenue and Hermosa Avenue; these applications were subsequently approved by the City Council on March 5, 2008. At the February 13, 2008, meeting, the Planning Commission also approved Development Review DRC2006-00633 for the development of a 166-unit apartment complex on 10.5 acres. The Villaggio on Route 66 apartment complex was designed to include both market rate and workforce units (35 units and 131 units, respectively), and the workforce units are provided at a variety of affordability tiers. Development of the Villaggio apartment complex was completed in 2009. PROJECT ANALYSIS: A. General Plan: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635 established the Mixed Use land use designation for the project site permitting both commercial and multi-family residential land uses. General Plan Land Use Element, Table LU-5 (Exhibit B), establishes a "Most Case" scenario where a total of 210 units could be developed on the 17 acres of this Mixed Use District, at a maximum density of 20 dwelling units per acre. Development of the Villaggio apartment complex provided a total of 166 units (a project density of 15.75 dwelling units per acre), leaving a balance of 44 units available for the remaining 6.5 acres. Development of the 10.5 acres at a maximum density of 20 dwelling units per acre would have provided a total of 210 units. Further, Table LU-5 identified that residential uses would only be allowed on 10.5 acres of this Mixed Use District, which is the land area of the Villaggio complex, thereby, assuming that the balance of the district would develop as a commercial land use. The proposed mixed use project provides a total of 170 apartment units at a project density of 37.1 dwelling units per acre. Adding the existing 166 units within the Mixed Use District will create a total of 336 apartment units, at an overall district density of 19.7 dwelling units per acre over the 17 acres. This density calculation includes the land area of the restaurant (The Whole Enchilada) located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue and the house located adjacent to the southeast corner of the project site. Because of the size of these two parcels it is extremely unlikely they will be developed as additional multi-family developments. As the 336 units is 126 units in excess of those units currently allowed by the General Plan, the. development of the project site at the proposed number of units and the proposed density will. require the submittal of a General Plan Amendment to amend Table LU-5 of the General Plan. B. Development Code: The Development Code establishes land use percentages for each Mixed Use District in. Table 17.36.020-1 (Exhibit C). For this Mixed Use District, Table 17.36.020-1 establishes a: district residential percentage of 0-62 percent, a commercial percentage of 0-100 percent, and an average density range of 20 dwelling units per acre. Adding the proposed 5.28-acre mixed use mixed use project to the existing 10.5-acre residential component of the district will result in', 15.78 acres of residential land use. This results in a residential percentage of 0%-93% over the: Item A-2 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00613—ALTA RANCHO ® September 24, 2014 Page 3 17-acre Mixed Use District, far in excess of the permitted 0%-62%, and will require the submittal of a Development District Amendment to amend Table 17.36.020-1 of the Development Code. C. Foothill Boulevard Design Standards: The project site is located within the Foothill Boulevard Overlay District (FBOD) and Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan (VIP). These two documents provide unique design guidelines for this project. The VIP will require design improvements to address site improvements consistent with the Hermosa Avenue Activity Center (Exhibit D and E). These design elements include unifying streetscape elements, large parkway with turf and meandering sidewalk, low rock wall planters in the corner setback, paved corners, paved crosswalk, Route 66 icons within the right-of-way, historic pedestrian level light poles, and streetscape furniture. Currently, a VIP Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area Prototype, with enhanced parkway features, widened sidewalk, Crape Myrtle trees, street furniture, accent paving, Route 66 logo, and brick pavers in the median were installed as part of the Villaggio apartment complex. All projects in this vicinity will be required to provide the enhancements as noted in the VIP. D. Proiect Description and Design Parameters: The applicant submitted a preliminary layout that proposes two building prototypes. One style is a four-story apartment building and the other is a four-story building with a commercial first floor ® and floors 2 to 4 are residential. The proposed 6,000 square feet of retail are provided on the first floor of the building facing Foothill Boulevard. Residential units include a Type A, studio apartment at 600 square feet; a Type B, 1 bedroom and 1 bathroom apartment at 750 square feet; and a Type C, 2 bedroom and 2 bathroom apartment at 1,125 square feet. There are 36 Type A, 78 Type B, and 56 Type C for a total of 170 units. The Site Plan places the units in a rigid rectangular pattern, with units fronting east to west onto Foothill Boulevard, units fronting north to south onto Hermosa Avenue, and then squared off with rows of units crossing east to west through the middle of the site, and finally units crossing north/south near the eastern boundary of the site. The middle of the rectangular design of the unit placement provides a courtyard, with what appears to be a pool and clubhouse centrally located to the units. The placement of the commercial units adjacent to Foothill Boulevard is a logical location as the units will need the exposure of the Foothill Boulevard street frontage. Commercial parking is located behind the units fronting Foothill Boulevard, and a gate is proposed to restrict vehicle access to the remainder of the project site. The design of the buildings is contemporary and utilizes a variety of materials. Materials used appear to be stacked stone, wood or metal siding, stucco, and glass. Balconies are provided for private open space and those balconies on the top floor have a trellis roof. Both of the proposed buildings are rectangular, with flat roofs and little articulation in the building plane. The flat roof adds to the contemporary architectural design. Suggested architectural revisions include additional articulation in the building plane to provide depth and shadow to the visual feel of the buildings, and enhancement of the building materials. • The proposal provides 300 parking spaces for the 170 units and 6,000 square feet of retail. These are calculated at 1.3 spaces for each Type A apartment providing 47 parking spaces, 1.5 parking Item A-3 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00613—ALTA RANCHO September 24, 2014 Page 4 spaces for each Type B apartment providing 117 parking spaces, 2 parking spaces for each Type C apartment providing 112 parking spaces, and 24 retail parking spaces. The number of parking spaces provided for each residential unit is consistent with the Development Code Table 17.64.050-1; however, the number of commercial parking spaces is potentially deficient. Typically, general retail uses require 4 parking spaces of each 1,000 square feet, which is consistent with this proposal, but the site has the potential for food service uses which generally require 1 parking space for each 100 square feet of floor area. The commercial uses are expected to serve both the new community and adjacent residents thereby potentially alleviating the parking demand. Residential parking is provided throughout with both carport and uncovered parking. Carports are situated near the clubhouse, along the east project.boundary, and in the northern portion of the project site. The proposal includes tandem parking, which places one uncovered parking space between two rows of carports. These tandem spaces would be restricted to those units with multiple assigned parking spaces to avoid tenant conflict, but the design of the tandem parking is not consistent with the Development Code aisle requirements. Suggested site planning issues include: mixing the parking and residential buildings throughout the project site, rather than the concentrated locations proposed. The applicant is seeking input as to what the City would like to see regarding the Site Plan, architectural features, and the use of tandem parking spaces. With respect to future transit, the General Plan identifies policies and goals to establish Mixed Use areas and higher intensity "urban centers" where there are convenient modes of transportation or future transit stops within identified areas and along identified corridors. Additionally these policies encourage the support of projects that are designed to facilitate access to multiple modes of transportation and reduce total vehicle miles traveled by automobiles. Within the Community Mobility element of the General Plan, a future Bus Rapid Transit expansion is identified along Foothill Boulevard. Transit stops have been generally identified at major intersections along Foothill Boulevard. Per the General Plan Transit Plan the project sits almost dead center to both the Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue stops. Staff' received a Southern California Association of Govemments (SCAG) grant for the Compass Blueprint project and prepared an additional study of the future BRT route. That study was presented to the Planning Commission and City Council in 2013. The proposed project will increase the residential units and potential ridership of future transit opportunities. Although this site is not identified as a proposed BRT stop it is within '/Z mile of the two future stops. Project sites within % to '/2 mile of transit stops can be considered as TOD sites and would still be considered a TOD. The Development Code currently does not have standards and guidelines to address Mixed Use/High Density/TOD developments. Code amendments are necessary to not only allow these developments but to encourage these projects within identified areas consistent with the General. Plan. Height requirements, parking standards, densities, etc. need to be studied and developed to support these types of projects. For example building heights are currently limited to 20 feet' within 50 feet of the curb face and 35 feet beyond that distance, which would not allow four-story, structures. Item A-4 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00613 —ALTA RANCHO ® September 24, 2014 Page 5 Respectfully submitted, Candyce rnett Planning Director CB:TG/ge Attachment: Exhibit A— Conceptual Plans Exhibit B — General Plan Land Use Element Table LU-5 Exhibit C — Development Code Table 17.36.020-1 Exhibit D — Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan Exhibit I Exhibit E — Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan Exhibit Q Item A-5 ¢x Brine sau-.IP Pumr T r1_ I � 1 It—f ``J -1-- ! 1 1 I11 —T—T—T— 1 2EET ' G e Resident Parking-46 direct+174 covered+57 tandem=277 Stalls(1.63/U�1i � i f i n i 1 +! I � I \I 3sty C A B B B C/B B C µ 1 I j iILLI C A B B B C L A it f f W i A ilii l Q COURTYARD B A O I B 130'X 90' B i i I A ii 11 I B C B = I B 1 B B Ir r l B B A CLUB C 1 I (1,900sf) 1 I i B A A B 4 Story Building FITNESS ABV I� i (1,700sf) C cr---------- ---- r , I I I Retail Parking-27 Direct Stalls i' Carport(typ) ' 4 Story Building 1 1 I ! C ( Plaza C + C C C •\ I1 Retail Leasing 1st Floor FOOTHILL BLVD 1st Floor 6,000 sf 1,300 sf Unit Matrix _ _ Required Parking A-Single 600sf: 36 x1.3 = 47 Conceptual Site Study No. 9 1 Bed/1 Bath 725sf: 78 x 1.5 = 117 3 and 4 Story On-Grade 2 Bed/2 Bath 1,125sf: 56 x 2 = 112 06-05-14 ota� l—-- – 170 _ofaTRes.:—276— 14022 Retail: 6x4 = 24 Total: 300 Stalls EXHIBIT A, Rancho CUCAmonn;:i MONICd b!N@tk :'AN J-P TILBURG, BANVARD do SODERBERGB AIA �fV�f,(3 cn Item A-6 4=11 m - - El FTm -1 IPP 9�"- _ - t ®, - Proposed wl- f I — Driveway Main Residential Building - Hermosa Ave. Conceptual Elevation Proposed Driveway - Signage Signage Signage Signage 'i Mixed-Use Building - Foothill Blvd. Conceptual Elevation Proposed Adjacent Structure p Driveway (N.A.P) 06-06-14 ,40z2 PREPARED FOR: moi/ Wood Partners Rancho Cucamonga -FNTX AMN11, DSAVEP .' „_E 17771 Cowan Ave. VAN MBURG, BANVARD & 50DERBERGH, AIA Irvine.CA -!'7 L 5 r R V X 11.G •NAA 'E- 4 ODZy 6wqWdeLIDdBd kULl. sma; la h`Y:eF ¢n / y f . l r - jMENi 4 j!� r * "r .'il�a.0 c1 s . +• t o >v':o:�aj a,••� ` r ,t. - ++ E Irl ` r -f - i I `. .L rL:- : ' d' K..! r.r w lift,.'1'f• t o& YL� •)x! t o-.• *•• ��. �, _� r7�..�dw.;.A:•��,r� ' �. - I f 1�.S a1)1)�'.�,�}�� ! •1� 1 �f it 1 z� ' � � � :, '•- - �. 71 •� I� ,may :� �w .1!r +. _ �'�• ,k t � .t' J.. W4 q �� +: iy�i;+✓'}. .,L„� ° - {(��.�""q�' a s, p / I+• r a..5 t + � �! �I,LL�//�'' � -�, " " �y� 1}y ` ��C t r� C { t' 7��7.t �` \' '� i 1 t 1.p t CYC,' � t '4 �, �11 r ,iS•,.4 "�' � Yi � 1 J. "19 •' •�i11 . - � � •.iS�:i5a_•..,Fri i. � i 3 1 ~ ..�+ X! i rS rFySJ.I' � '� �~'1„t! • � �� ' r � �y•,�,��` F�k11M41CA.frMr..'+1.." �•�y 'r; p � :�}� r I�•.t.. ;q s / ' i 'TRT 11 .Y �r 1 COY-• t .�, �j .� .t: Y;+k J,tr "r �_ �,t.+. sir .:2 T"•.i } .i t !y ' �}�, 3��1. .. aAdw.Y LIS J► ' ° ea• w • .�, P� II!4too9� .: ,� :�i/Ir� �•'IdpPL,':j�'3 r l/ 17 !i •� r_!n S P�4 Y i , '�• ( � '? i �' f `� �a 111 ` ! II • tL �.�r■ t +14.a l 6A i 1. r• ,�, 4 • .f'1` / „ �'�,.,' •V I' ,1 � � L 4• .71 LL' � y 5 i• 1 1_ 7 Jr'• a• r1 �ri .761 a�. � ,•�'''f` �4 � .�1�i .1�}�•'1fr�i t'T�} f'� - '' '+w 'd�gf ���} r 'i ' � ' Tc (� �Y t - � iajw ir -40 ■. 1, --" r f 1� ! si:►tkMt u ♦ 1}I�� • ' Ll 1 .} mm •c 1 Q �... ♦ ..(� A �4 .._ ... ��' -_ '•r �� - ,;[ f� t4', .�.�i�l.>t.tr r't ,r�r 1 � �� ! i� r ,t ^. .L !Z J �' � ,���I• •: to ', IIT 'yrs �9. _-'tZ. S rsl Zr I Ir+{+ .t �" ■{• �� 1 ,� -. .� s ��}.. ,'[y� ' • �� 9 1,,.'M� 'jr r i• Pn.' 1 1 ( • 11 t a • •'K v2 wr. �!� �Hd .>E7��u• • •' t ��'�11��L2wa�i�!1.�Srr�S`�� �1"�t��'t I j"�+ r f •�'� � f1 1 y 1 Site Prrlinn Ir Rcpurl - ^^ Location Legal Description • 1 I ' -1 - - Vicinity Map I _ I Sur esor's Certificate Lk .. ISE iP411fl � u� flE� . Verul Schedule B Exception Easements • I 1 e ; u.Je •k 1 Basis of Bearin8s 1, .. ... .., I. Benchmark 00 General Parcel I 1 I. .a Legend 111 I+ 1 I 2:Properh Address 3:Flood Zone Designation .. '", "'... ""' "'^,•. Hndhill Boulcsard s 4:Cross Land Area 5:Vertical Relief _— - -- - -- -- "---- 8:substantial Features Boundary Easement and Site Improvements Survev Preliminary Senirrs,Inr. ALTA!ACSM Land Title Survey Illianrr 1 and Planning anA F.nGineerinR Table LU-4: Mixed Use: Terra Vista L9. age Range Estimated "Most Case" Land Use Percen ge Density res/Dwelling Units anulacre (du) � Office—professional, 85%-87% 45-47 acres 47 acres medical corporate offices 6.5-8.1 acres 6.5 acres Residential 12%-15% 6.5 @ 24-30 du/acre or 30 du/acre 8.1 @ 14-24 du/ac 195 du 113-195 Totals 100% 53.5 acres 53.5 acres Note: 1. Indicates target density, not a range.Actual density may increase up to 30 du/ac as long as the total of 195 dwelling units is not exceeded. Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue This site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue (#4 on Figure LU-3). A Master Plan was approved and implemented for the site, which includes a 10.5-acre, 166-unit workforce multi-unit housing project, an existing restaurant at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue, and commercial, office, and restaurant land use at the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Table LU-5 specifies the uses and range of development allowed. Table LU-5: Mixed Use: Foothill BouleN-ard between Hermosa Avertue and Center Avenue timated "Most Land Use 6 Perce creag Case" angel Range dLi eslDwelling .. AIL Residential Medium/Residential 10.5 acres @ Medium High 0%-62% 0-10.5 acres 20 du/acre (Up to 20 dwelling units per acre)' 210 du Commercial— Retail and restaurant 0%-100% 0-17 acres 17 acres Note: 1. This Mixed Use site may consist of a mix of Medium to Medium High Residential uses, which may include multi-unit housing of up to 20 dwelling units per acre developed subject to the applicable density range requirements. EXHIBIT B y Design, and Historic Resources J G A G E N E R A L P L A N LU-27 Item A-10 Article III, Chapter 17.36 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code TABLE 17.36.020-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE SITES Land Use Mix N C Mixed Use Sites y m vCY 72 E cv aNi E O .c a � U a Q Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors 21-36% 20--41% 5-12% 4-14 du/ac Town Center(Foothill Boulevard and 25-35% 10-15% 30-50% 0-10% 14 du/ac Haven Avenue) Terra Vista 12-15% 85-87% 30 du/ac Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa 0-62% 0-100% 20 du/ac Avenue and Center Avenue Foothill Boulevard between Archibald 15-30 Avenue and Hellman Avenue 67-70% 30-33% du/ac Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue and 30-40% 60-70% 30 du/ac Hampshire Street Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue 26-50% 40-60% 6-10% 4% 24-30 du/ac Industrial Area Specific Plan 11-22% 15-25% 40-60% 7.5% 28 du/ac Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek 70-75% 25-30% 14 du/ac Channel Haven Avenue and Church Street Site 0-100% 0-100% 8-14 du/ac Western Gateway(Bear Gulch Area) 30-50% 50-70% 14 du/ac Foothill Boulevard and Cucamonga 0-100% 0-100% 8-14 Channel Site du/ac Historic Alta Loma(Amethyst Site) 0-100% 0-100% 14-24 du/ac Section 17.36.030 Development Standards for Commercial and Office Zoning Districts A. Purpose and Applicability. The purpose of this Section is to establish minimum development standards that are unique to development projects within the Commercial and Office Zoning Districts. Development standards in this Section apply to all land designated on the Zoning Map within the Commercial and Office Zoning Districts. B. Commercial and Office Districts Described. As identified in Chapter 17.26 (Establishment of Zoning Districts), the city includes six (6) Commercial and Office Zoning Districts: EXHIBIT C Item A-11 Foothill Boulevard - Historic Koerte '`• HERMOSA AVENUE ACTIVITY CENTER Streetscape Unifying Elements EXISTING ELEMENTS: tinntic I -Large Parkways with Turf and Meandering Sidewalk oL uu'vc •low Rock Wall/Planters in the Corner Setback vI ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS TO HELP UNIFY: I eritinvG raalclNc -Large Parkways with Turf and Meandering Sidewalk Pave Corners with Brick Style Pavers — L= •Low Rock Wall/Planters in the Corner Setback •Pave Corners with Brick-Style Pavers li •Pave Crosswalks with Accent Paving Material I Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete _ Pavers in the Medians -Route 66 Icons within Landscape/Sidewalk R.O.W. Duplicate the Streetscape Pattern from -Special Artwork or District Identification at the S.E.Corner(On the Other 3 Corners), ; all 4 corners With Meandering Sidewalk,Icon Placement, i — Crosswalks Paved in Accent Paving Material -Historic Pedestrian Level Light Poles Low Rock Wall,Planters,Etc. Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete -Paint all Traffic Control Hardware and X Informal :lusters of Tree, Rollin,, rr,,. X Berms and Meandering;idLv—i!t. TYPICAL SUBURBAN PARKWAY Plan View and Flevation i JV Parkway Setback Widths Vary W •�._� � � )-,`� � .16' Minimum! Single Globe Acorn Style Street Lights atApprox 120'O.C. FOOTHILL BLVD i--Crape Mvrtles and Rhus lancea with Low Ground Cover and Shrubs" *See City Standards for Required Widths _ —Refer to Foothill Blvd.Specific Plan, Suburban Parkway and Median Standards Double Globe Median Street Light for Additional Accent Lighting(optional) at Approx 120'on Center where Feasible - Parkway Setback Widths Vary 16 Minimum) h PLAN VIF)A rp 3 Double Globe Median Street Light for D Additional Accent Lighting ioptionall I at Approx 120 on Center where Feasible w Informal Clusters of Trees,Rolling Turf Informal Clusters of Trees,Rolling Turf Berms and Meandering Sidewalk Berms and Meandering Sidewalk B ** - '�% /— r 1) __�,,�xSingle Globe Acorn Style Street � Single Globe Acorn Style Street x' Lights(Banners optional) Lights(Banners optional) ZiA*We 5, T a-_r ice-•_ Crape Myrtles and Rhus lancea with Low Ground Cover and Shrubs** I � V I� t � t 6 Wide —6'Wide Sidewalk— _ _ _ � __ � Sidewalk* I Parkway Setback — ExisUngTravel Lanes Median la — Existing Travel Lanes Parkway Setback �• 16 Minimum 16'Minimum ELEVATION - --- ---- --- Exhibit Q - C-,,b 6(�tifelle GT.ea� THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California IF- I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Wimberly_ Vice Chairman Oaxaca Munoz_ Howdyshell _ Fletcher IF- II. ANNOUNCEMENTS At their meeting of August 27, 2014, the Commission selected Commissioner Wimberly to serve as Chairman and Commissioner Oaxaca to serve as Vice Chairman. They will serve for a one year term on both the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning Commission which is reviewed annually per the Planning Commission Administrative Guidelines. Please welcome Chairman Wimberly and Vice Chairman Oaxaca to their new positions on the Commission and thank Commissioners Howdyshell and Fletcher for their prior leadership and service in this capacity. 1[- III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 CUCAMONGA Page 2 Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Approval of Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) Minutes dated August 13, 2014 B. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated August 27, 2014 C. Approval of Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) Minutes dated August 27, 2014 J= V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. D. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19550 — RANCHO HAVEN, LP — A request to subdivide a parcel of about 87,120 square feet(2.0 acres), that is currently developed with two (2) commercial buildings, into two (2) parcels of 54,014 square feet (1.24 acres) and 33,106 square feet (0.76 acres) in the Industrial Park (IP) District and Haven Avenue Overlay District(HADD), located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Sixth Street. Related files: Conditional Use Permit CUP 99-53, Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-01193, and Minor Development Review DRC2010-00400. This action is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315—Minor Land Divisions; APN: 0209-262-20. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 27, 2014. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE TO AN UNSPECIFIED DATE. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450 — SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION -A request to subdivide a 13.23-acre parcel to create 3 new parcels within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street - APN: 0209-211-24. Related files: Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 CUCAMONGA Page 3 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00565 — SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION - A request to develop a 6-building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street- APN: 0209-211-24. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. G. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2014-00250-SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION- A request to establish a Uniform Sign Program in connection with the proposed development of a 6-building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street - APN: 0209-211-24. Related files: Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 -COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. -A request to change the land use designation from Industrial Park(IP)to General Industrial (GI)in order to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6 acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related Cases: Development Review DRC2014-0000127 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. -A request to modify the Zoning Map to change land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) in order to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6 acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related Cases: Development Review DRC2014-0000127 and General Plan Amendment DRC2014- 00012. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - Site plan and architectural review of a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6 acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related Cases: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014- 00126. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 CUCAMONGA Page 4 K. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2014-00774-SSRB GROUP, INC. -A request to modify an approved Conditional Use Permit (DRC2012-00057) to increase the hours of operation in order o open earlier for an existing restaurant and bar(Sixty6 Sports Lounge) located at thet hast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue within the Specialty Commercial (SC) Development District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, Suite K1. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION VII. ADJOURNMENT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL IMMEDIATELYADJOURN TOA WORKSHOP TO DISCUS PRE- APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00613—ALTA RANCHO. THE WORKSHOP WILL BE HELD IN THE RAINS ROOM. I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 18, 2014, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CI SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 °NG" Page 5 The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us f • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKSHOP MINUTES OF ;CHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 13, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center ***RAINS ROOM*** 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I: CALL To ORDER • Roll Call 8:20 PM Chairman Howdyshell A Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz X Wimberly X Oaxaca X Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager Economic/Community Development; Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner; Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00617-KAMRAN BENJI-A request to.review Item A-1 e HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES 0 AUGUST 13, 2014 Page 2. a conceptual site plan for a 193 unit multi-family apartment project with a potential future retail component on a 7.55 acre site located at the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue.The design would require a General Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to change the zone classification from Community Commercial to Mixed Use: APN; 1100-201-07. Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner,presented the staff report. He mentioned that a strip of land to the east was finally acquired and is included as part of this project site. He noted the future opportunity for BRT and mentioned the idea of flexibility so that some of their proposed apartments could be converted to retail to allow for a true mixed use in the future. He said they have a concem about the grove of trees and how many would be required to be retained. The applicant's team consisted of Mark Bertone(Madole); Serafin Maranan and Joanna Magianti from Architects Orange. Kamran Benji, the applicant, summarized the history of the prior project application. He said currently there is great demand for upscale apartments in this area but little demand for commercial/retail. He noted the needed code changes, the tree issue, parking ratio, and the possibility of up to a 4-story structure with a mix of lower story buildings and varied story elements. Mr. Maranan explained the project proposal noting an interactive,urban site plan with an architectural urban edge; and suggested an iconic statement on the southeast corner. He mentioned amenities such as a clubhouse, pool, and a spa-like resort space. He proposed a 3-story transition in the front along Foothill and 4 story transitions in the back including some tuck under garages with direct access to the ground floor units. He asked for the Commissioners input on mixed use for commercial use later and the possibility of shared1joint use parking. He noted 95 parking stalls are held in reserve. He mentioned that the density of the Amli and Meritage developments are not much different than this one. He explained that because of site constraints the same density is achieved with 4 stories instead of 3. He mentioned several architectural style options such as `Contemporary Californian' that is modern but familiar. He said other styles could also be considered. Chairman Fletcher said it is very different from anything they have seen to date. Commissioner Oaxaca asked if there is an assumption that this project would influence decisions regarding transit and if it is the intent to justify it because it would create a source of ridership for the BRT. Item A-2 r ® HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION SOHO WORKSHOP MINUTES CUCAMONM AUGUST 13, 2014 Page 3 Candyce Bumett, Planning Manager, summarized the analysis performed for future transit and stated the BRT is looking to cities to be progressive along their corridor and so far, we are progressive in comparison with other cities. Developments like this help to get future transit. She commented on the density and noted that this is the first to be brought to the Commission like this and that although our current code does not have standards to support this, staff can develop design standards and amending language can be created as we move through the process. She said that Foothill Boulevard was identified as a major area for this type of development and density in the General Plan. Vice Chairman Fletcher voiced concern about the problems in that section of the City,it is a difficult time for businesses. He expressed concern about creating density for transit, and confusion about the proposed joint parking. He said (after looking at the proposed site plan) the visual from East Avenue looking in to the development looks like rows of parking. He said he is not totally opposed to this development, and not opposed to more vertical development. He said we need to ask if it serves the needs of our community, look at the constraints for the size of the property and keep the design upscale. He noted the east end needs a stimulus. Commissioner Wimberly talked about how the big idea was that at some time we would have to change how we develop and accommodate higher density. He noted that the City even considered modifying Victoria Gardens with high density development. He said the developers should ask if they were relieved of certain constraints, what they could build. Kamran Benji said this development will survive even without the transit. He said there is the benefit of bringing life to the east end that is currently suffering. Commissioner Munoz noted that it will depend on the plan submitted and suggested they watch the view and be creative. He said the Commission is ready for a change in architecture and suggested they be mindful of good articulation, color punches, quality, and uniqueness. He suggested they stay away from a massive Spanish style. Commissioner Oaxaca suggested they use the opportunity to look at the constraints of the current code to see if we are maximizing our opportunities. He said it may make sense to see how constraints can be molded or changed for a higher density mixed use project. Vice Chairman said he is hearing support from staff but said he is also hearing concern for it to be done right. He noted they may need many more meetings. He cautioned Item A-3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RHO AUGUST 13, 2014 Page 4 against "scrapping"our Code/Plan for the sake of a single development. Mr. Maranan said they will look at the current code and try to work with it. Ms. Burnett noted that our code was designed for suburbia;but for the future we need to create urban standards, and look at changes in open space and setbacks. Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager, Economic/Community Development said we need to ask what the younger demographic is looking for. The younger generation is more mobile. Our generation placed a high value on private space; the younger generation wants more public spaces to meet. He said the idea is not to throw out open space but reconsider how to provide it such as in public courtyards. Ms. Bumett explained the next steps are for the applicant to work closely with staff and to submit their plans for review. .,,.,,l....ii:v:..♦..-k:+...:.....:.v.:..-'T:.y.e'.-F.....Y.n..:�...w...._.w..'."..K....P........:.......f.'w..t.t:.....q._....'.i...•.:.�uv::...-�.'....ro_...i.....,�..{..`.'.-w-..v:x."'3:.x.'.Xir�.:...:r.2q... !.:t'.e�y._ -x" OEM rL 9:25 PM If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and Item A-4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION �CNo WORKSHOP MINUTES CUcn oNCA AUGUST 13, 2014 Page 5 speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." . Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. ® AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us Item A-5 • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE MINUTES OF ;CHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 27, 2014 m 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California EM •;yE _YFW.t •r' '�F Y� �':: �y''.+.--•,r,:-:^. .. •-�` • Pledge of Allegiance 7.00 PM Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz X Wimberly X Oaxaca X . rt`'' Rr_'S%;'=:r- :r-:�"'.-'.�.,`�'-s:s�-..e �-d.'.�;---'Y.+'�:-;.F:s-+ .;zn�•a,.,,,.-j ,.an.....�,.,.�:?.+'•.s^:��?�i,.:`^-�S�,st".;.^- --- - -;.:a'i"�'_. .u'� Y�.�'.: '�1. . ;.� P•; - � l�,.a, j��y�gT�'�.H. ,•a.�. � .�. (�'ak�` _y "•n:....�,:.. &:,.._''s..'7s`3..:.':i-.i°r.�.,�.,.. _ '.G`r'.*;.s.:a�:z ,,r.>�:w"y..,•C•..�:^ i.:s»"�3''�"'".z�3���vlC��.d 117."7,'�`•_ ;tczr..;. _:� a� 'r.:__...;...k..._-' ' `tea�• �' ..i This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. • None Item B-1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 27, 2014 Page 2 ����?? >'$. - •_ est Y `�' + -fid ],`'' "x A. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated August 13, 2014 B. Approval of Adjourned (Workshop) Minutes dated August 13, 2014 Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Munoz, carried 4-0-1 (Howdyshell abstain)to adopt Item A and take no action on Item B. 0—,M—ni C. Selection of the Historic Preservation/Planning Commission Chairman and Vice Chairman Officer Positions Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, carried 5-0 to select Commissioner Wimberly to serve as Chairman. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Munoz to select Commissioner Oaxaca to serve as Vice Chairman. D. Selection of the Commission Representatives for the Design Review Committee Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Howdyshell, carried 5-0 to keep the existing DRC membership of Commissioners Fletcher and Oaxaca to serve on the Design Review Committee with Commissioner Wimberly remaining as First Altemate. E. Selection of the Commission Representatives for the Trails Advisory Committee Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Oaxaca, carried 5-0 to select Commissioners Howdyshell and Fletcher to serve on the Trails Advisory Committee. Chairman Howdyshell commented that she fully supports succession planning on the Commission and suggested that in future updates to the document, language be added to the Commission Administrative Guidelines about that process. ;:.r,;.,....-.... , .:..,.T; BY �.rK—�—M :�%..��..*f^w;:.�y{... ;N_�_;� �Y:'.r:::' �' � f.:..1BL� ; . � ��:,_-,.. - r-.F. k'w,..:$'v........ The following items have beenadvertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. Item B-2 J HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 27, 2014 ��► Page 3 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00378 — CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING FOR DEDEAUX PROPERTIES, LLC - A proposal to construct an industrial building of 120,624 square feet on a vacant parcel of about 240,000 square feet(5.5 acres)in the General Industrial(GI)District located at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Rochester Avenue;APN:0229-262-48. Related file: Development Review DRC2008-00185. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration. Donald Granger, Senior Planner,presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation(copy on file). Charlie Buquet, Consolidated Consulting, clarified that the square footage is similar as before but the square footage should be 124,500 square feet, the floor plan did not reflect the mezzanine. He said most of the existing trees will remain and they intend to use grass pavers. He said the City will install a signal in the future and that a new Green Clean water system will • be installed. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Seeing none, Chairman Howdyshell closed the public hearing. Vice Chairman Fletcher asked if the discrepancy of the square footage would affect a decision on the project. Mr. Granger said the different is minimal and makes no difference with respect to the decision. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney, instructed the secretary to change the resolution to reflect all references of the square footage to be 124,500. Commissioner Fletcher offered support of the project. Commissioner Munoz said it was well designed the first time and is still well designed, he supported the project. Commissioner Wimberly said he had no problems with it,he looks forward to seeing the finished project and that it will generate new jobs. Commissioner Oaxaca thanked the applicant for readdressing the additional environmental impacts and mitigations. Chairman Howdyshell said it should be nice to see. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Oaxaca, carried 5-0 to adopt Resolution 14-32 approving Development Review DRC2014-00378 as amended and to adopt the Addendum to the environmental document. Item B-3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ANC RHO AUGUST 27, 2014 GA Page 4 G. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19550 — RANCHO HAVEN, LP — A request to subdivide a parcel of about 87,120 square feet(2.0 acres),that is currently developed with two (2) commercial buildings, into two (2) parcels of 54,014 square feet (1.24 acres) and 33,106 square feet (0.76 acres) in the Industrial Park (IP) District and Haven Avenue Overlay District(HADD), located at the northwest comer of Haven Avenue and Sixth Street. Related files: Conditional Use Permit CUP 99-53, Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-01193, and Minor Development Review DRC2010-00400. This action is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315— Minor Land Divisions; APN: 0209-262-20. Tom Grahn,Associate Planner,presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation(copy on file). Andrew Koltavary, Project Engineer, questioned the conditions related to water quality and BMP's. He said they should have been addressed 15 years ago. He asked why the conditions are so focused on water quality. He said the conditions make the project fiscally unfeasible. He said items 4 and 5 on page G9 would require the removal of the existing concrete. He said he would have questioned it earlier but he has only had the report for a few days. Tom Grahn,Associate Planner said that it seems the conditions were written in reference to the original approval, were missed at that time, and now they are trying to address it. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney noted that the City may be bound by some of these conditions because of changes with Water Quality requirements. Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Fletcher, carried 5-0 to continue the item to the next meeting. Chairman Howdyshell suggested the item be continued but opened the public hearing and because of the continuance, lett the public hearing open. H. TIME EXTENSION DRC2014-00471 - RC 66 PLAZA-A request for a time extension for Development Review DRC2007-00657 which expires on July 8, 2014, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road in the Mixed Use Development District at 8269 Foothill Boulevard; APNs: 0207-113-23 and 0207-113-24. Related Files: Design Review DRC2007-00657, Time Extension DRC2014-00623. The Planning Commission determined that the project was categorically exempt from the requirements.of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(c)(New Construction). Per Section 15162, no further environmental review is required as there are no changes to the project. I. TIME EXTENSION DRC2014-00623 - RC 66 PLAZA -A request for a time extension for Variance DRC2008-00462 which expires on July 8, 2014 and is located.at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road in the Mixed Use Development Item B-4 • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 2792014 UCAMONGA Page 5 District at 8269 Foothill Boulevard; APNs: 0207-113-23 and 0207-113-24. Related Files: Design Review DRC2007-00657, Time Extension DRC2014-00471. The Planning Commission determined that the project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (A) (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations). Per Section 15162, no further environmental review is required as there are no changes to the project. Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing none, Chairman Howdyshell closed the public hearing. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carried 5-0 to adopt Resolutions 14-34 and 14-35 • approving Time Extensions for DRC2014-00471 and DRC2014-00623. J. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00425 — MANNING HOMES — A review of 5 single-family residences that will be constructed in conjunction with a previously approved subdivision in the Very Low(VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road between East Avenue and Choctaw Place—APN: 0225-181-73. Related files: Tentative Tract SUBTT18747, Variance DRC2014-00535, and Minor Exception DRC2014-00536. On June 12, 2012, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18747. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. K. VARIANCE DRC2014-00535— MANNING HOMES—A request for a reduction in the rear yard setback from 60 feet to 30 for Lots 1 and 5, Tract 18747, in conjunction with a review of 5 single-family residences proposed for development on a previously approved subdivision in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road between East Avenue and Choctaw Place—APN: 0225-181-73. Related files: Tentative Tract SUBTT18747, Design Review DRC2014-00425, and Minor Exception DRC2014-00536. L. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00536—MANNING HOMES—A request for an increase in the maximum wall height from 6 feet to 8 feet along the southern boundary of the project site, adjacent to Lots 4 and 5 and between Lots 3 and 4, Tract 18747, in conjunction with a review of 5 single-family residences proposed for development on a previously approved is subdivision in the Very Low(VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road between East Avenue and Choctaw Place —APN: 0225- 181-73. Related files:Tentative Tract SUBTT18747, Design Review DRC2014-00425,and Variance DRC2014-00535. Item B-5 • gTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . CHOWORKSHOP MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CUCAMONGA AUGUST 27, 2014 - 7000 PM* TRI-COMMUNITIES ROOM 10500 COVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CIUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. CALL To ORDER Roll Call 8:20 PM Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X • Munoz X Wimberly X Oaxaca X II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and the speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Candyce Bumett, Planning Director, gave a broad overview of the purpose of the workshop, which is to give the applicants the opportunity to present their conceptual project to the Commission and for the Commission to offer comment and general direction. Steven Flower,Assistant City A(toiney noted that tonight's workshop would not include any action or decision on the project, that is reserved for future public hearing(s). Testimony was received from the following persons both in support and opposition of the project. • Suzanne Thomas of Cross & Crown Church said their goal is to serve the community and therefore need to sell a portion of their property for financial reasons. She said the developer has made a great effort to address the issues. She reported that the wall was built on part of the church property and there was no written agreement concerning that. Item C-1 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES �� AUGUST 27, 2014 G'UC=NGA Page 2 Lorraine Ming, a Toll Brothers homeowner, said the homeowners want the wall, it was built with a permit and is described as a garden,perimeter, and retaining wall of their development She said the cost of the wall was included in the homeowners'purchase price. She said to remove it is illegal. She said they rely on the wall for a garden look and safety. Paul Russel said the City will collect some tax revenue from the development and said it would enhance what is now a dry field. He offered support of the project and suggested they tear down the wall. Raymond Grigolla said he did not know why the traffic would be directed onto Camesi. He said his street is currently used by school traffic. He did not favor the project. Regina Johnson said development.nearschools will always have traffic and we need to embrace growth and development in the City. Micheal Scott Jepson gave support of the project. Jerry Bredlau said he lives on Pinon. He said the school traffic is awful and that there was an agreement with the City about the wall. He did not support the project. Patrick Lee said he lives on Camesi and opposes the removal of the wall. He said the builder keeps changing the plans. He favored access to the project from Etiwanda Avenue and using the church easement. He cited traffic impacts. Debbie Camuu said Toll Brothers asked the church for permission to build the wall and they gave it because they wanted to be'good neighbors'. She said the church wants to eliminate their debt. She said she believes the Toll Brothers residents are trying to isolate themselves from the community. She said the project would enhance property values and eliminate a vacant field. Sharon Huey said Cross and Crown Church has a history of service here and abroad and that promotes the good name of the City. She expressed support of the development. Katherine Pretoria said she hopes for a `win-win'for both groups. She looks forward to the new homes and said Rancho Cucamonga is a wonderful place to live. The public comment period closed at 8:45 PM. ..... .. ........M.:, ----- .�...::..:..:......... .c.:.... ... ..,•.,.,........:..,......,.--•:—?k'i• 't3'.::• _ fir::" M........,x..�..., . ...:.,w..._-._.,.,III,..,. .�:..T�T�11�IS.,TOR. A. WORKSHOP REVIEW OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18936 - STORM WESTERN DEVELOPMENT INC-Site plan review of a 17-lot subdivision totaling 8.32 acres (16 lots for residential purposes and 1 lot for existing church) currently located within the Very Low (VL) Development District with a request for a General Plan Amendment (DRC2013-00961) and an Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment (DRC2013-00962) to change the project site to Low (L) Residential (church site to remain Very Low Residential) for a site located on the south side of Camesi Drive and east of Etiwanda Avenue; APN: 0227-061-03 and 82. Related files: General Plan Item C-2 r PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES ego AUGUST 27, 2014 GucnMoruin Page 3 Amendment DRC2013-00961 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2013-00962 Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) detailing the project history, the residents' concems and the evolution of various site plans/proposals and the pros and cons of each. Jay Ahluwalia, President of Storm Westem Development gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) also describing their company history, project review history and the various alternatives to the original plan submitted. He said he believes the wall was built to assist as a retaining wall, to direct water flows and to provide a streamline street scene. He said transitional landscaping would be provided to minimize the awkward condition ofrearyards backing up to a side yard. He said flag lots would prevent them from losing lots and landscaping would minimize impacts. He said buyers like flag lots because they have long driveways to park more cars. He noted many homes are built with these same conditions in local neighborhoods. • Commissioner Fletcher expressed his appreciation to all those that came to the meeting. He said he likes the reduced cut section of the wall. He said itis not appropriate to restrict the property rights of the church. He said providing an Emergency Vehicle Access at the knuckle of Street A is the best solution, that connecting with Pinon was not the best idea. He said he did not have a big concern with side elevations along Camesi that those elevations could be enhanced and they are likely to be somewhat hidden by the wall anyway. He said he did not have a big problem with flag lots because they help deal with the uniqueness of the property site. He said traffic generated by 16 homes is negligible. He said reducing the cut of the wall would preserve the feeling of the Toll Brothers development to the north. He said the project would be an enhancement to property values. Commissioner Oaxaca said he generally concurs and both he and Commissioner Fletcher serve on the DRC. He said they both thought the applicant should rethink the site plan. He said the cul-de-sac solution is the more effective option. He said changing the density to Low is the most reasonable approach. He said the rearlside yard and flag lot condition is not ideal but at times unavoidable. He said he would want to see more details of the design of the proposed entrance off Camesi Drive and he would also like to have a better idea of the landscape treatments to mitigate the rear yard/side yard impacted lots. Commissioner Munoz said part of the process is hearing both sides and the needs and concerns of all. He said he concurs regarding properly owners rights. He said it appears the developer has gone to a great extent to try to address everyone's needs. He did not believe traffic from 16 homes would be an issue. He said the density transition makes sense. He said it seems to address the concems of all 3 groups...no one group wins. He suggested the developer focus on design. He said that new homes can mitigate the perception of • devaluation of the existing homes. He suggested that with the 60-foot entry that it should be a `great'one (i.e. visually exceptional). Item C-3 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES HO AUGUST 27, 2014 oNCA Page 4 Commissioner Wimberly concurred and suggested that they make the design as upscale as possible. He said he is adamant about 360 degree architecture. He said he personally dislikes flag lots and the side yardlrear yawl configuration-: He said he recalls a suggestion at a prior meeting to scale down the project to 94 lots and that he did not see that idea presented. He said he recommends that they work on that suggestion. He said the entrancelgateway should be as outstanding as possible. Chairman Howdyshell thanked the Commissioners for their comments. She said smart planning is key and that the aesthetics should be consistent with the Toll Brothers development. She said they should blend the two and that is doable. She said the approach/entry from Camesi to Street A should be"wow". She said she does not favor flag lots. She thanked the community for coming out. She said this gives the applicant strong feedback to put together the right project. a<.,...I.d:.g.: ._�:�:• .....,-: ....,_ :,:.: ..•-ym--••,—.c:w.�si: vx;;. r.�=' _;.'d:,:. 2R NO <'�.;';r•:a":��"ra•; -..+.A�:a.a 1 1"'•c••`F.AI.....,��I.:. .f^•Y.n•n. yy.•r S..-•Y. F - ry"�_-'.'•-.e"._ _ _��1�' ....-- '.:... a 'G'' ... :_..•'.+v-.T•W:!. :� ..! ._'.'.'�:,!" i^Y:":y:'.`1. _ _ >;:^.i A....-.1."A'1.x :"«:' ,r......,..,q,.: ....^^a.. ,al-..-.v::...o.I,..Y:...a�.;::i:•..-r C..'^'fi:•-' '1 - .-']':' ail a: .:..:...:.. �:di,,..:'y.: ... ..x.,,ss.?..._... ..�,,.a.... . ...:a......� ..1 e";.y•^"'Yi'.��•::v-)'•:. .`.f`:7i`"::::.:....,,..,..: �.., aY`r .CV'SY.. ,.1.[..••�A �5..,^ 4...5.1 .��0.., '..; '_ .•�1:s'JL-,•::• Y^.�.`. .• .'.V• .rY. . �'i.Y.1_.::4.mAlGue•K.r:.::a...:�._f..._:.'._i•....ur.::.ui.t•..r_•,e4�,....•_..........::...w:s...><..,lF.,.�>1.,..� ..is......w �:4'... a.Ae.d.ms ..�-.: 9:37 PM If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION.FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and Item C-4 w l PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES AUGUST 27, 2014 Cucnn�oNcn Page 5 speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." . Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used forthe official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 • a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,533 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us • Item C-5 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMI11rf Date: September 24, 2014 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner Subject: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19550 — RANCHO HAVEN, LP — A request to subdivide a parcel of about 87,120 square feet (2.0 acres), that is currently developed with two (2) commercial buildings, into two (2) parcels of 54,014 square feet (1.24 acres) and 33,106 square feet(0.76 acres) in the Industrial Park(IP) District and Haven Avenue Overlay District (HAOD), located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Sixth Street. Related files: Conditional Use Permit CUP 99-53, Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-01193, and Minor Development Review DRC2010-00400. This action is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 —Minor Land Divisions; APN: 0209-262-20. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19550 be continued indefinitely until all WQMP issues are resolved. ANALYSIS: At the August 27, 2014 Planning Commission meeting the applicant raised several questions regarding the applicability of several conditions of approval relating to the WQMP. After meeting with staff, the applicant decided to continue the public hearing indefinitely in order to resolve the identified issues. The application will be re-advertised when a new public hearing date is determined. Respectful submitted, C-f Candyce urnett Planning Director CB:TG/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Applicant email dated September 2, 2014 Item D-1 OW Grahn, Tom Subject: TPM 19550 From: Ino Cruz[mailto:ino@jntmgmt.com] Sent:Tuesday,September 02, 2014 12:33 PM To: Grahn,Tom Cc:Andrew Koltavary Subject: RE:TPM 19550 Tom, I would like to request a continuance until we resolve the issues with WQMP. I will let you when it is resolved and we can re-schedule. Thanks, Ino Cruz—Senior Project Manager 224 S.Joy Street Corona, CA 92879 P. (951) 280-3833 Ext. 2 f. (951) 280-3832 c. (714) 299-9736 mailto:ino@intmemt.com EXHIBIT A 1 Item D-2 STAFF REPORT PL.-INNING DEPARTMENT iDATE: September 24, 2014 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450 - SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION - A request to subdivide a 13.23-acre parcel to create 3 new parcels within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street-APN: 0209-211-24. Related cases: Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00565 - SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION - A request to develop a 6 building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street -APN: 0209-211-24. Related cases: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2014-00250 - SCHEU . MANAGEMENT CORPORATION -A request to establish a Uniform Sign Program in connection with the proposed develop of a 6-building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street -APN: 0209-211-24. Related cases: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450 and Design Review DRC2013-00565. • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450, Development Review DRC2013-00565 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of approval with conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Industrial Buildings— General Industrial (GI) District South - Industrial Buildings—General Industrial (GI) District East - Industrial Buildings— General Industrial (GI) District West - Industrial Buildings—General Industrial (GI) District B. General Plan Designations: Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial • -- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00565, AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2014-00250- SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 2 C. Site Characteristics: The project area is located on a 13.23-acre vacant parcel located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street. The site is surrounded by existing industrial development to the north, south, east, and west:The site currently does not contain any trees and, similar to adjacent properties in this area, does contain a gradual slope from north to south. D. Floor Area Ratio: Per Chapter 2, Figure LU-2 within the Land Use Plan of the General Plan, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) allowed within the General Industrial (GI) land use category is 60 percent. Following the completion of the buildings, the total building floor area will be . 171,941 square feet. The calculated combined FAR for the project will be 29.8 percent. E. Parking Calculations: Based on the uses and square footage proposed for this project, a total of 335 parking spaces are required. The development, when completed, will contain a total of 452 provided parking spaces and will, therefore, be in compliance with the parking regulations discussed in the Development Code. Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Foota a Ratio Re uired Provided Office 56,926 1/250 sq. ft. 227.70 Manufacturing 15,211 1/500 sq. ft. 30.42 Storage and Warehouse 1/1,000 sq. ft. for 38,131 first 20,000 sq. ft. 38.13 1/1,000 sq. ft. for 20,000 next.20,000 sq. ft. 10 1/1,000 sq. ft. for 36,775 remaining sq. ft. 9.19 Halls, Restrooms, etc. 4,903 1/250 sq. ft. 19.61 Total 171,941 335 452 ANALYSIS: A. Tentative Parcel Map: The applicant proposes to subdivide the 13.23 acre parcel into three parcels, creating a 2.13-acre parcel (Parcel 1), a 4.82-acre parcel (Parcel 2) and a 5.89-acre parcel (Parcel 3). Parcel 1, which adjacent to Archibald Avenue and 7"' Street is approximately 530 feet wide by 175 feet long. Parcel 2, which is south of and abutting Acacia Street and Cottage Avenue, is approximately 450 feet wide by 615 feet long. Parcel 3, which is adjacent to the existing rail spur along the eastern perimeter of the site, is approximately 400 feet wide by 615 feet long. B. Design Review: In addition to the three-parcel subdivision of the subject property, the applicant also proposes to develop a 6-building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area. Building 1 (15,775 square feet) and Building 2 (13,415 square feet), which are located on Parcel 1., are designed to cater towards businesses looking to occupy buildings that contain a large portion of office with minimal storage area. Building 3 (19,950 square feet), Building 4 (20,500 square feet) and building 5 (20,391 square feet), which are located on Parcel 2, are Item E-G2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00565, AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2014-00250 - SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 • Page 3 designed to cater towards businesses looking to occupy buildings that contain a primarily open warehouse and storage area with up to 40 percent office area. Building 6 (81,910 square feet), which is located on Parcel 3, is designed with the intent to accommodate one large industrial user, as 76,775 square feet of this building is comprised of a single, open warehouse and distribution area. The remaining 5,135 square feet of the building will be used for office area. Lastly, the building will contain multiple shipping and receiving truck bays that will provide vehicular access into the building. The buildings will be comprised of concrete tilt-up walls, portions of which will incorporate decorative sandblasted wall planes as well as vertical and horizontal 2-inch wide reveals that span the length of all elevations. The building will also include clear anodized aluminum mullions that surround the storefront glass windows and doors, all of which are recessed into the front building elevation. Each building, with the exception of Buildings 1 and 2, will have metal roll-up doors that will provide access into the warehouse area of each unit. The applicant has requested to construct this project in two phases. The first phase will involve the installation of all improvements shown within Parcel 3, the landscape strip adjacent to the 7th Street frontage, and the landscape strip, drive aisle and drive approach adjacent to the northern property line of the site. Phase two will involve the construction of all remaining improvements, including Buildings 1 through 5, as well as remaining parking and landscaped areas. The development, when completed, will contain a total of 452 provided parking spaces, 27 percent overall landscape coverage, decorative paving at each drive entrance, and three employee break areas, all of which meet the requirements and intent of the Development Code. Additionally, staff notes that the initial submittal of the proposed development did not incorporate rail service improvements that are required by the Development Code for rail adjacent properties. The applicant has since incorporated staff's comments and feedback into the development package, which now includes an optional future rail spur that will tie into the existing rail spur adjacent to the eastern property line should a future tenant at this location have a need for rail service. C. Uniform Sign Program: The applicant is also requesting to establish a Uniform Sign Program (USP) for this development. The Development Code requires that a Uniform Sign Program be established for all new multi-tenant shopping centers, office parks, and other multi-tenant, mixed-use, or otherwise integrated developments of three (3) or more separate tenants/uses that share buildings, public spaces, landscape, and/or parking facilities. The proposed USP contains provisions that regulate permanent building signage for each individual tenant as well as permanent monument signage for property identification. The USP allows for a maximum of one non-illuminated sign for each tenant occupying Building 1 through 5, with the exception of the tenant occupying the space closest to Archibald Avenue in Building 1 that will be allowed to have a total of two building signs. Building 6, which is intended to occupy a single large tenant, will be permitted to have a total of two non-illuminated building signs. The USP indicates that there will be a total of two property identification (monument) signs, one sign to be located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street and the other sign to be located at the southeast corner of the site, adjacent to the end of 7th Street. • Item E-G3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00565, AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2014-00250 - SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 4 D. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca and Granger) on May 20, 2014. There were no major issue raised at this meeting. The Committee forwarded the project to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of approval.. E. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental.Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality,. cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring.Program has also been prepared to.ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectfull submitted, Candyce mett Planning Director CB:DP/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Uniform Sign Program Exhibit C - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated May 20, 2014 Exhibit D - Initial Study (Parts 1, 2, and 3) Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2013-00565 Draft Resolution of Approval for Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250 Item E-G4 90-9 Wall V 11131 HX3 r -- ---- E ------- co POEM ______________ L�R C H�111�—I AVE. 0 ------- .... ..71L ....... 01 1.cn Lj COTTAGEAVE.------- j P1 H .......... ... ................- I PXM� —JFT q. IL ------——------- L1-------------------- ------- ------------------ ----------- Lm how filial .ql111 111 IL L mfl, PO, 17r, 11 ill! _!I [ SCHEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY I F IF e.a.. .w.a+. � - __ - 4'd- � "mesr•"nwmrx ...•rvnn.s.mrM.00•.!•.n•arenYSM•a4 •� _ ' na.ro.ms .aa.v".an oesmacet+mv4.au �._ _h1a_tiF•�xt!__L�12� __ _ _ ___ ma..rasmwu.ssruu.uenrrcn4...wniwuno - . ar..enc...c®4 srv�.aw eatriun®omsmn •s... .... _____._ ___ -_ S. __ • re.a me.m mwo rr. nw a•. 1 .1..olrM e.4.0 • m a n�s.nua nwva u�"°a`"•"�.a.a. .. .. •a.w a w..kr. a w.eMlmelmmtw,M rM..p.in nMwlC\� — r o�.Rvara aM.M/•w W/Merm�M.adwwMnwva �vlM 4•••f P�r� mrouc0 wneuays4 ru�ii W iT—iY f.Ml4Om•lGmI..W IaMV.aT4.a..M a.tt..4ns rlt. a.•tsn•"rn• a..ua,.ar�srwamvx PROJECT DESCRIPTION 21 STATISTICS SUMMARY 6a�.�:." m.rvumK4L n:aw.a.n4.v4..ne�.a n.a LORI many "•` i. I k aENEWL r UMM 1 a• - Z OACACIA STREET • � � �:• roq • s , • _ a --- r ° Nrr - ^ 1 d . W } MO r IrA.--=-•xV S-■y4y��[f:iZ.: /�--�• 1coUsLLU Ul • •� Eli B Wn L" o mein MDUMw:a i ae6ULwuffrwL CENM&vcunF1ALDED ► q Q .o �- _ o a - wd & LU W19.1;I.Fj - I I I . i t 9 :: 11 U. WEE --——-- ---I , 71h SfWf meu&wuffTvw m..... t C DETAILED Sn PLAN 5 d • •g� w .w 4s7"-'R.��-�7":-c"n3_-Fry__F�___ry�i_-4,. -_F'.____-__F;��F><.o � ••• Tld I 4, L FL ....a .A, ..[ aa4 of Ya rfn.Malebo Faw.WH �v,uM Cr`WYO," .nr. � 1 �;F--a---e3e..•nis•-� ......— Par•-...,...,...F�'.•' •. � Ynl.o.a'.m.m.ro)r Y.'ncao,�ev.err B 1 ! FRI. R.B. uF, = I ^a—fi=y= ir=4 T. NX AM -s= r TE:3 N � � >.,....:....•,.. ....«).... +�in�:i i�A:�:tl o.-,........z.....�r...)+... A�i:.i'ii)...,ii i v � a . z � n• n m: nm -.. r ..,, ,+I .,. ..n o.. th.....rn•a.' a`,i 1„ w ....�... +:+'. :.< :•:A. a.a.....M,wm mn,..r. ;� +•h • Irn,orrr.an l.w:.iir,mn ii __rii__�i^__ a: t0 }nY 'Y.: f,'.f tY.1 IAII ry w.1 ....r• T• �� ..+rr r.ue..lv{..M ...f.Y ,.ro:.wm.t T— ••new.., unr.ww, .____•'___Yeeee -nee u.e•...-..aA•w.>w.r...a....., 1.s-a..aa.A ua.....a:ye MRN .ul ....Yu.,u.a.-..a+.-•ru4-�'nua..as.>.1'••IV`•'Wi.l i:�l'� bi rNae q..a<.:[Yv.a,:n iI-]i'.wr...4ut\-I:l��I,1.•4�1�1' �•'�T1�•�v� 1'0>l911Y EM ""s ? J1 ANVdWOO Alddf13 '13313 n3HOS ell I II I I I I u 9 Q `2� a� i��2 �Ga!� � �! ! ! �;� �� ��� ab��e P1 ! 6P � b •p @ � E ! } @!� ! f ��BA 6 } el ?i MJ. �;!a�EE:d 11l 6 1 � ? 8$FA5y 195. 2B8pig to 1 L s ` :;... b P ; , ` . {'.... �\ `. •::5: ., ! ! =�5��`q•q6�ye tg $ q} .:�... •� �� Q •� * \ �\.�:'X�'�s � � ,'1 \ F1S S�,P.1� .•.y e 9Ei � � t �•i�l�j iet¢ a qp PPg� a g8 'a.:,:' 1 ¢ g n P ® m 0 ¢ 1°g ia11 !!! lei tei�gg a } gb� P$ z � t 11 Mill HIM S ® ® /•�1p+ay{� 3 ` `/ r :: _ i`� ,11 dl�`-f I .7 '�� Q¢ c @gp # b GP i y 4 gR se g if I lit go :B ZZZ lit R �w �P Item E-G8 s LSI — — — — — — — — - -- t ' kNVdWOD AlddflS 1331S n3Hos d d t W € E1 Ekl it. ——— •'—— —' 3lIN3Atl —.R.;.�Qltl9lH�atl— '-- — —-— — Z I F777 Item E-G9 L D-1 ANVdWOO AIddOS 13313 f13HOS ------------- ==—=, �, k•.,I ... � :: EEE r. ' E E;� feetaEE::�E •' I::: tz i .�.a. ?? I . 3, j .E, .E !. — - n ' E cE '———- ——— 3I1N3AV �•,.a� O7d91H7aV — — a Item E-G10 WEST FACING EXTERIOR ELEVATION r .l_�_l �m 1 m g I Z iC 0 NORTH FACING ,n=b T1 SOUTH FACING n 12 V Y Q TRASH ENCLOSURE NOTES J fCL ILI � i co EAST FACING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONw=+ 13 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN n `< 3 IL LEN N3 g EIFS CORNICE .n+°-r 9 SECTION uM 4 Rtl } Rtl +� Rr f -_ I - i - IC i � wn f o ,T_,` 5 r. TT n. �, .y i.:•i 9EDN°� BIIlD�7 _ ............... ------------ +y�. •••(E)FENCE AT ACACIA 21 (N)FENCE ALONG ACACIA STREET-NORTH . 8 FENCE I- plus �� M.oiw� ■•/eoll••. MIer1 '� p�Wolw.LLw m•• .. — — ACAClA STHEEi I -------------- ................................... , ee.cnm� T •} ......... i Z 9L it I• � BULD104 IL OFROE ela�o-e s s p W 1 7 I OE�EML accoffYIL BIRDN?•1 ° 9 ; V '•� 0 .I 1 oue I � E1LWO" BU.OPIOO ! •I . . ° li'lc.• .i 1 -- - ------------ ------- - - 71h STREET 2 j -'_•_.....--------------------'--...........---.-- __----._..---------_-._--_".-. -- -- - - (N)FENCE:-EAST 4 ! • 1 I RSIHli ••"'����irt�ies si Eti'ss :n lH I — :f IC i '. two- ID (E)FENCE 5 ARE FENCE PLAN £L0-3 W941 -04 FF W •�-.ole -�.:_-� e.qi 3975 iilic� C;7QI�, o� o 1 '� z .....~"'' .—.•. A.T. & S.F. RAILROAD R/W rFu P•C1r<7= aYen.i..a ......... .. ' a a o Its 1$1111,111HI Hi N 49 D ,� I.I I I I I �€ISI i.i- �� _ SCNEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY �� a_ b LJ-9 wali . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. �j� •a --------------- 2 ee S@ . p Y (O A �1 4 ............. ......... ----- j A —________--__.. I I _____________— I A I e --------------- -----—------ •� 4 � 0 0 --------------- --------- .........----.....--'....................................................... '-........ . a� Q� 4 - - P SCHEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY FEW. Anvawva A Lamas 1»13 ilJnJ.l j it ntl[l I I I I i 151 I ii - I•I IE d � �I j ............. I -------------- R i r 0 4 i ------------ .. ---'-_ u � r 4 N I I i .......... .. p y -{- ............. St ! III I O r��iLL• C7 �Mtt m CL Item E-G15 9 L 0-9 wall e --------- - 4 i •77 1 i k + . k I �. ...... ... i 4 ------------ -------------- --------------- ---------------- L _`_________ 4 4 t ............. i 4 _______________ . i --------------- i 4 p - ............. 4 4 i 9 ............. --- ---------------- . ------- SCHEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY t. - _ . _� L 10-3 wall CD T i l4 . I• I ' j ---I---- i i i e a —i - i -- e § i �a 6 4 ]�o•7`I'1 1 ;P ,SCHEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY - i Fe: a ,. 9 LD-3 LUG41 ryJ '43 •---------- ----------- --- p . ---------- --- - --------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ---------- ------------ ........ . ............ SCHEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY .1fln., Frti i ui-ii illm _It 1111111 A ANVdW00 Alddns uns nuns 11 da ll LLL L�� W Q $ -ES 1 �� ue T..:,....._. . _.- cc 0 � P h P P ........... P ............... 7 "T AI n T b � o g ;r L IO Oa -- C k -------------- h ..... ----!! P P °P O - - O lima,. a !!1 '' Mal :�Er"yyr O � Z { [fl 1 Ffe�e J Ls:tl6 Item E-G 19 OZJ-3 wa}1 8 El 11 El x 1 - •ter. O L 7r `S, - --� 9 t � -z : I8 -----.--- 1 til ��� - SCHEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY^ �.: ANVdWO3 Alddns 1331S n3HOS Q ooQa -- 3_ tgk � ofp € El .____._..____.__.__ __ _.___.._.______._.____ _`__•�__._.._.._ LL e6e4 �� AaY4 1 I� 4 4 •� LEI ------ ZM;v W a � � . m Z LL s cc Item E-G21 330-3 W24I r D 2 i co C .. .. ../.... .. .... .. .... .. .. .... .. .... .. .... .. .. ... Q .: .. .... ../.. .. ....... .. .... .. .... .. . .... ._.:_.: Com' \ ---------- '120 }} - rt- NJ pap =e MEC ' x...uw.��.�—..�....--w.--�,�..w.�.��.—_.._.—�.....-........_�.�.--....�•...—.w.�..�—ter..�—.,.a.— Dk nI. 1-1 I ISI€I1 SCHEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY f UO-9 wall .;................................................. ............... ........... -.1 O ................ . -------------) ........... . . ... 11 J ; I ill III F Zo m CD E3 I I 11?I?I? I SCHEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY VZO 3 W94I . ... o 0 0 ................ . . /o 0 13 a o / o 1:3 / a o ° s � D C all g IT §CHEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY 7c _ AMVdnUJ A10611, I:99la IMMOO I I m --- -- I I=yin M i i i i u I Q n ❑Y + 3 e 1y aED 0 O @ a1 ...,-..._-•:' :--.:-:.:...,_:.._..•-•"••-:..:.,.:.: LL I+4 ni �y a Ee o. ..... . .... ... 0 0 a o ; i ' o 0 a o % � �.,. - 00 o % o 0 o 0 0 [— N O J_ 5 LL O iz Item E-G25 930-3 W941 s Z 6 � x — ------'--------------------- --=------------------------ -------------------------- - _--- -----------------7L____—___ _______________.-___--------- :1 ——_____ l ---- -------I------_ ---__ AM -------------- ------- --Q��- -- -----Q------ID----T -- ° -- -------- -- T� -- ... .y,.. . .gp.. C-1 --------- - %----------- ---------------- ----------- ------------- ------ � � 4 •� ------------- ------------- F$ a --------------------------- lie Will � e ;ilia a a. a SCHEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY eV s _ � f+ Z I d i0 I0 V � J ( a d I I I I I I I W I I I I I I I�••, ( yW N I i ❑ I I ❑ � I 'I '• I 1 I I � � _ � I V r l I I I 1•. � ^ I I f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I\ ( ROI I I I I I I 7� I N✓ I I I I I I I I `� � Q ROOF PIAN NOTES ENLARGED ROOF PLAN-BUILDING SIX-OFFICE 5,135 SF '' 1 =g�q I I I ANVdWOD Alddns 13315 MHOS t f Q � j e I 9000 opo ...... .... oe o e 1 t 1 M § r B ,B 11, MH , _ I I G _II I w I a � - I A... .w Us 1 �t 11 �. � ..I I •I I 9 - I I I I 0 rw' I I I 1 1 I a Z - _ . - I: 1 I !1.7 V Item E-G28 ANVdWOD A1ddns 1331S n3H3S I I mg � � E4 0 a B = ` 4� 7 r- r. W 0 W. I' f. LJ 777 � I �:l I I -0 rLI I LJ - o Q r, A I. ILL— cn r-1 W PPP �L i I _ 12t I _ I.I I o Z o F W ..::� W W z IL C=7 LL Q LL LL CC z i rn Item E-G29 ANVdWOO Alddns l331S n3HOS Ati Ar I LO 0 t' f o 4d Hill 1 ; 13 77 1 'A I Olp ..A tl� '.,•�..;� ''µ.,ms— .�^I I n 4 . 1! LJ+ PM 7 I I ` J I 1'I ' � � I I I I •i � I I A ln: I I I I'.I - — c F a Q I ; O ElI I Item E-G30 ANVdWO* Alddns 1331s n3Hos Ed d � w 139 � � d � I w 11pi'll lit 01 I ff j! I A i T,411 .... ....... id A LL L i a. I MUM ...... .. ........... z . .... LU I C3 LU z z FPIF. LRL i a : p F- '- cr 0 CD LILL z ki,I Item E-G31 ANVdWOO AlddnS 13313 .M.Nos is lei lei lei I I I I I id -Z7 MIMI M M-1 . ..... r7l F, .;: I - :i i, A LJ jk -J,'. P' r7 T.,77. I. LL t LJ 7 rr + 77d ........ . PR L<L LJ Item E-G32 ££J-3 wa4l � II 52 I J F 17 z D D ! j, I HN I a I 5 v r1 I .i Lj m , = o . _ ° g CA SCNEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY �� 5 ti£D-3 LU911 m Fn....... . ... . .. .......::..::. Z I 1 I �NI jI �Y'.•':.r n r i 1 I 1 - •� ,' I 1 ` I• I I I j M lO I j r r • qi I I I I [c I I - I 1 I • j � I::::, 1 � I I I I lO 7: YK � I 9. I y .. 1 - I 1 I I I I I I I � 1 1 1 1 I I � M,7I I ...... . .. ,. it � N ' SCHEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY s ML i—I ANVdWOO Alddns 1331s n3HOS I 01111 dlal111111] 8 lin HIM, !ODE 000 71...... E,.T Tr, U IM. ..P,..p ..... nnnww i. W .r P. F pp 1111P IM: wi V4 O so N. is u ............ of.q LU LL Item E-G35 9£O-3 wa}1 FRa n i 1 1 I 0 1 a ro �� SCNEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY �,�� OWNERS SITE AREAS ..JD � a;5 5 �,. wpss/xq ARG(ro Qm.c nRgr R/NJ uss Ac Leland Schou and Julia S.Stllau r.c. rM ar WM `f T N.A.Lee Schou xq MQ(N OETRMTE trxER Nlysm S[heu MCQuede wS 1 A- 11.84 AC I.C. ASMMi COxCRR[ Nlyn Schou Family Limited Pebnere.P IL MOO— PROJECT BENCHMARK OLO C OF R A e[N--NO, r 'ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER BE--AN M­rw MY 0--sa—1 cpwq Aaw sTWT un. wvERr br Irr • Amlu[ r.w. rM OFF w%u Lr.x.Ozsr-n t-n-O-cOo cYvrux:s4wRaaz UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS rns� A- eM:m xaxa LEGAL DESCRIPTION r RrAcr rxr ux0 Rvrexm TO IaMw IXcow 4 srtwrlO x wE wn w a— r.e. rnnsx wuor CISMI[R[OWwMAHMs 100-LY-xl3r CCGYOXOt MIMr)0I SW ILAUROM.Y�r[pI Gurwwly Yp 4 M.fRR. CRIIX eNAR W ULSC41L0 AS ICIxDI)S: I1MSN rtOM twE wARNq -Mi x)SL 4!' MC S YCMN 11 IaNNAw I SWM,wII I wn,SUI egNMOiM tMAOr rMf�rtWR SIx �C'M KMxON W IU 1000 [ANO iwRIwYI AttMgM 10 IIID W CUCMIOMG LINOS,w!N[ r d R couxrc ar sw IERxl wO,n•rc or cawaRML•s rl:R weI MCMorO ui. crNIFRUM rlcE e.w rx(amcr M nw c0uxrr RrroRou M ,.y,� e. w rouvn �J. rq��INT[RSECIMM sr sn ��• s sWrww nuronw•lwMN Mo-eu ern .s w ewlA' 4 acerrxM rwr raRrNx IXYRnra u mswrs sewn swrN[Rx uurMM•OM cow•xr oro u)uW x f. k as Y�" y, IXC1wNIL Ar ra NOR.wgr(MF Or sm for s.sso MRrxRAr RMxr-IX-wr euMYe wn[.WsrRm eM-eu-xsn coRxM erMe w.[ Or c.YAge oAMNwa Avexur.q .rtq Rm[ ® ursrRM roll TO Rr Reslarm svexn Y a�y r MYLL xG�Ix 01M nE MMM�0f r4D�1�MMtt SWw r0 iRq ROrDYM PFRMI . .11 I xiwmc eIN rxi NOR. uF sw wr us-1 1D L •, - „e W.D.I.D.NUMBER sew IXwxr Or ARweeIXAMiriu ase im rimw�wEllrIXx uaM v::z']..!' rAOr0Y0 cRAOM sial( a� N. a-.•',t r { ` £ �` ! •8 } ."S0D rE.rt M111—1w.xr,ri cMonrOiuim TO rM AN-ON.ciaow IROPOYO Asrxur coxcxn[rMRw •h ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES Arlin u.IRe)w esaN was,uIX Ns omzN MroMS rwr xroR.xr _ = sxgr now M.wu 3 �� e *� 11f uerx swAq Aw Onrccnon IX now `� Mer wrMl r.as e.r _ '- ;, ;:'t,rkr I off.;:% r_,m:.k ,.-x•,".•M% _Qrsrwc MML caxrww ux!t-N—IN Ixe orcRquvArwx IMMYO FRAIX coxrow uxE ` OR we510ENCI TO DUC IO OVEIX%EAVInON —.—�—(%rsrw0 CMAM-lMR rtxtt amamma IWOSLO LOIICREY wMR WROrM w•u .�� PMMnO COIMACn Nncw RrrAwxlO M . M �/ A'OIOYO MrowrwE rtN[(fwMl MIr� LUIOSC•/f•ACIRIRYS II.vIS � IMAM fnM VICHTY MAP ._—� r%rsDM RnurM w r —SO— IRMDYO SIOMI MMM NOT TO SCAIC ® e0r0Y0IMA OeMX ® IROroYO WM MIO OrlR4r (D v rAOMSEOc•rE —s— rROrwuO s(wR m w tt ej n— 21" rss e s ss is C iI rRMf;.•CUR. eii ,L I__ �YGMUIMF wML x•corm e-cDM — ? Qrsr.e•WRe•w/rr[R —1LC.PAY[Ildfr-- ,ZI. , prsr.LC.PAr[Y(Nr qT.AC.wreYlM 71h STREET TYPICAL SECTIoN ACACIA STREET TYPICµ SECTION ARCHIM4 AVENUE TYPICAL SECTION srAIE. I nO•xuwz. I�'rQe sruE: I•=xo'xoaz I=:'rm. saiE. r=w Rmz. r•.x•reRr. r' Dnr, GuRern� & ,>zissgciatas SCHEU STEEL 7th STREET BUSINESS CENTER TITLE SHEE xavn gaR®is . iwg e,NEraRe °¢"-0 ,RAOF,AAMr CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN - DRC2013-00565 SUBTPM19450 SHEET , of £ nAI1010 d![JMI(Ir•M G etno Fl.s®)Mlttoe Fa(aw1 M1-laa wm,Mnowra...ee.owlvr Itl'IYl � I.. II ,• Il• Y.Y' If• • _ _ � � �— 1 .J, L7Rf t �1 ----- 6. 1 - -------- 6t1i Yl->mlf -�•.�M .. itYY tYY 1 t ------------ f * ........ `..' SECTION A-A --......,• I � SGIL 1.47 100t. 1.4'Otl. - ' I.I— •�: N»•Ilx—i r tr w• R01'Wl�• 1,1' MiF ... y1.. 7 ,• s° mom mi spm/I 7 Vf IN- AIM -... 1 AIM low G,:�7 OD SECTION B•B ,,,_ _ :. . Ids It$ s .. I 1 Y lural ! ! t t091 r � Il�L• I C RN'IR RI!'YR • K tl' L' R' j4- iir�•cwt � � 7 sJt rs, aw m wat ,� --- �`.'.._ — �F'=•�I BIO-SWALE D&I'aL ---_- -_-- 1 i� V ,CYO 1••!' - - SECTION C•C ......-......... ; I I, SCaL• I1y'IpII. IW NI. _— �� 1 1 1 I 1 I I ALTERNATE GRADING for FUTURE RAIL SPUR OPTI( tees 1 1011. ISY YNL Daifuem, & �lsencintes SCHEU STEEL 7th STREET BUSINESS CENTER SECTIONS & DETAII CONCEPTUAL GRADI-.NG PLAN DRC2013-.0056.5 SUBTPM.1-9450 SHEET 2 OF M1MORI 4IUMIOrYN G %1,a rn oanlvwam f+Nwusa,aam - ... . Ila�ao.m.ee.l.lo PEI LA1 m �.'.. Zo PM n i �I� zs•A I(�u s�' u' ` II �nlsr.r.c.c d Y ;�ms g �3\ �\. f a'arra _ — _ YuxofRslc f4R F -* �ursrA �qr.e'eeRe .Y s �. ,a � r�'�\. c vAnY(xr ss ourr(RAc.ranxu.r adr.4c.vxnxw/l ? f 'swrtus • ������ € 7Th RTREEf 7VPICAL SECTION ACACIA MEET TYPICAL SECTION ARCh11BAlD AVENUE TYPICAL RECTION aK� c� q��'�T'RWR7f `� suu: rno•xR.a. I.:rar. wuf. r n remz ,-r rrn. s... r w•war. ,-.r rcR. VICINITY MAP xpr rd sralr CD CD 3 M I OWNERS SITE AREAS Leland Schea aml Julle S.Schau GMS/NR ARG(IO RlfnAi SrRCR R/W) r)IJ AC Q Nexin Lee Schell NR MG(m ULnWrt SIRCR R/W) IS.M AC Allyson Scheu McQuade DtmaiatR.wu ,3.e1 Ac Allyn Scheu Family Limited Par,nerehip ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION rxf uxR RrfaRLR rR x(RfW er(oR rs seGrLa W aL ttn a R 'YAt , A r x oma-u,_x1-o-eoo coescul�ifo 2�'�a s4r enwRoro.mrz ar Gwaxu..un rs P,swrx,AAxO(x xESr,sur BGNMORAI Ba(SIND Y(RgWI,AC[04WN0 ID YY Oi COCIYOIrG 4x05,W IIIf UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS rouxn or sm IL—Scirc If..tAe,As rce Y4 RRRRxo Altri e00-}ee-}oxo S40�NROMn Wv3,PAOF 9,W IN[Orrltf Or rw[Wxm ll(CORO(R K CNARr(R COYYVNIGiwNs e00-xfe-I13x aCaIWO/xA!MRIAW IXSale(0 AS POu01K: IIYE eARNFR eee-e91-x311 1.M1-11—.1— S,fAw.1-1 � ..F. eee-Im-1000 a e[xc�N M(�HORa�YM(OP SYD l01 St,('fR:rM L�50YM IFl C-014A MM NAI[A IISIWC! 909-Rex-}Sal IMLLIfI InIN llff TFZ.G SY1 AR[wWD-.1 X50([[n INfMC[Ir[Si IAULL(l RI(H 111E— —Or 540 101 131 I[LT t0 1 SOUMGN GUrORWA LOISON e00-Le1-alts c[Nr ,o(RARCWe4a ArfNU(aN!fR mf nY ro OOrN 40X0 sourxax c.uroewA Gs mwAxt eoo-.n-uae uiawvc. eVR:RI[C HAST[—tual(s 909-ext-2599 450 GCE➢!a(q[EgOY M[PoglpxS cwn'RG ro IM AICxrsOx.ro 4�SANIA�RµttMA�Y C�PANY.A CpRmRAIgN.IN INC 0(a R(CMOm .r r x ILLr w,IXrxs4 xrnRns. DQ/l 1�E101117 & Y�snciatea S C H E U STEEL 7th STREET BUSINESS CENTER TITLE SHE E aNL F,ANFH18 . l,vo amsyas TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP - DRC2013-00565 SUBTPM19450 SHEET T OF s m(ROR,ari a Fei lem,eA,naae YrLo�dpWrW�aaoe.opn I I � :r I N• I I IW ; I Y- /' a I 3 ........ _.._ : : 1 . ..wsnY..aa s r , ........................ T� '. 4 � _->''^ ^"'.�.........,,,,.... ^^T`�lAi`"i'�W:•"..-,�,........._._ __ __ _„ .. :... :.y_.•_�J^1,�. _ _ Nzfru imww:.rr. r .a.. �,_...i r._ Y .c_.., ..Yr• I 1 -- ::: FYI � , I I ; W :` �� j �i I_.v-.F' � •,-� �_�.,�._.;:r'i-Yz�»:.:��:�1...•-�'�n�.._�! ;t;�.I �_.. � I—m' _ w �• i Q 3 I r!� I rs" ; ! TTIT111 r �laL___.___ _ �_,___.___. _,. ; �y Lim 1441 PARCEL r-t � i I 1 !.__� - _::r't-.r:i�a. ... .�j-•-{n,,:a:_t"_"�. r__.• ,�s ".i � _ B ___ � z PARCEL 3ui i 5.89 AC rp .. ..- E- ; : I , : a6 Q1 ,� 1�!•I �I `_ . i I y� I ! i� III ' i. \ ��' cm i ! ro ,.w I „ i JCI^•.-3-.tx.1.•.WT.';Y �'. i 13' i I,_:L: �:'+-3� �yl —? � ! : t : t (' � .. i:� .. ,j; _ u.Sw S •,I}":=- ..f�'t04�_i �'.,....... ,- y.''•_ i I �'j l .�/. -••;::Z4• � -� ' wr : : : E ,; I tr��.a�. r 7 r I i� : ... ��mi..: •4 � !�l-I•i i 1 yj*�..,Tl-+-.`Z.:-.•!-`p-t'T�T�,-:•"'�E�':��'Y�.�II ` ..—Y... ...j.. ��••� __ 3 �1 y r r ! #� /�;13�Z0 r' I I �A`::i•e.�.irarrn' - `.i PARCE r . :� -.-��_ _... _ _ t as. •tea>: I .........._.......... ........- -- — — y :... '-:...!..a.. ,axaroxt�a ... •Inr ...._ r•.:1I n,.,;tl:M;-.� zz,j. :a+`'a" �:1 .v. .....:........._..., ..,-......,._._�-_ ..:. __..........w-.�.........___.. ._.._.........._.....__._`___ �... I 1 fl ,,� � .:: 2 m !;!aarGir,'vY'� _'c:"',,r"m'9..:* •�!. �"'f t`''�!" r;�nr' ��. i . !�u. ..... .......... .z...:. __.... : ...__.. fi x'�'i E i .........................-.............__._. tQi3Tj. �- r-r/r✓.r m rme. u.✓ NN. p am rwf zMa'zuu �t �:::�.::.�:::.::::. h STREET ... ! Dnn d luerrn �t �ssncintes S C H E U S T E E L 7 t h STREET BUSINESS CENTER TENTATIVE PARCEL MA TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP - DRC2013-00565 SUBTPM19450 nur o currwontt�a r,rao SHEET 2 OF 2 rr.(•m,aer+sm •u(YaY1 w,-,eae xno�aur,a...ao.00r., .......... ........... ........ ........... ..... Ttl . ...........-- ... .. ........ ...................- ......................... .............. -1- 4-W D ZD BD BD ---------- I 1111 i�u I I I I I Tt 1+144 -------------------------- - ---- --- -------- - - - - r-j 7�il:c4nj=� ; -------I TV, ... F I -J 1 L6W-.LLU 11 FnTFFU.U.LLU I I I I I L I L-------------------------J 14, M I'M L I W l-,j r CD C, fw j C% 22 ir16 I I�'II� i I ' I i ' ( i ' I iI— i. .i-,_ I I �t �- I T-4— T rT • --------1� 11 W.U.1 1 L,-, ------------------ -------- F 7th T 2 4 r, 6 7 18 1 K21 C ) C D t -ER�0%"m OW IWECT*N&MANTENANCE SCHEDLLE PLAN LEGEND WOAD BMP AS-BULT CERTMATE 11 AW —=.,=m%d.,k.. v L SO BY MC I-- P-.10...cl IS.1 W.) .......... a BMP E X H I B! 1, A6-r6los S C H E U S T E E L. 7th STREET BUSINESS CENTER -00565 SHEET 1 OF CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN D R C 2 0 1 3 SUBTPM19450 810-SWALE DETAIL i JG""�� / !;%� �� iii i► g�� .. '/° - h it z'i uuiiiia ii iiiiii i..i■i n iu`..•< ��%�, ,r a% • Esc 1 I io;,W v rrrr r- r is/ti�f NIX /r �j,j• / //�/ / _�rrrrr rixrf>_ rfrirs +i � ��` i.��%/., ' ■ ■ � � %/�/ �/ '%! _ 7 i iii/�� ' ii / %• `134 Ad i. 0mm 9 r,M .rte .►y rM �. �!� ° %/ / / 'i! I!`� Al .\\!V\\�\\N\\\XN\WN XX\ 1vx RX\��a j �� �j�l ` i ra�•o� //�%VZOi_�i' p ��:%i � j % � •• �� civ ��',/ r-r PROJECT DESCIFOPTON 21 STATISTICS SUMMARY 6 GENERAL MISTRAL LOW DENSMY RE3CENnAL GENERAd-WDUSTRIAL Z KEYNOTES CL ACACIA STREET 'b Ni 0 U.1 li W -U-- L W1 _j co 5(o z o K&DlN%-5 F-1 z 41 UA 7-� SC 11 ll�;, OBERAL INCILGTTIAL DA-DNG-4 BULDING-6 GENERAL MUSTFUL jit GENERAL WUSTRAL DETAILED Aj SPE PLAN A 77V FRILMIG'a li--F2" --loio I r-.1 0 711, STREET D E RE�AL GENERAL MISTRAL DETAILED SITE PLANS 5 PLANTING LEGENDLANDSCAPE NOTES ----- -------- - - ------ ._.__.-- -_._ - _.__.--------_.----------- n,v / • L IWW W ooM«m to cdy a R.wb C,c.morw c,w nea ACACIA STREET — r,ME,:eeNrm.rrr.bnz�+aRo AY Hees w:mbs•DreRy Herd acAPeamaxw,waed.w lTod 6e - MWD EASEMENT NO TREE ZONE : / wATwbtda,RDeuer,.,rtxCAN F,N wAu • AYas aMuE/9muaknver xrenbrtcarve TlMck MW A. � - - --- , expENS Lwe,nnCRna�,rA r,tH .n F. • AaeMw9rdwW ulilk'aWbo eueel.ed wlPWM malaiel �' • AT an.erb LaMfca L Irr S.W M mebbxled 5 nwcaaa w.:fRrrt rrrtE m,Nmn • ParLirg La�Nau+q IC be Provided Mal PrAWn9 Lal Iraef rIBc,L PZEI • AT PIanb ee WUCOLS-LD.Y a fled•ad -L,oLMe,ROE,rArD.Rrt r.Pr.Pa.rr.reaox .,FE .."IUOUSasrI.. Axl+vN.re+ulprt8' . m CD I'iD BNDA•aN Rlanl want l ea.SRea and VVIICOL6 dans lerlo _ �•. ,I ! \ ' f © ' a Yrt cER.xaFFm.E R,owF wuu r•F • NO Turf IS PrPPW ed lar J,e proleGl • Ir,ipsl Syal b be Recycled weer ready 1'• • lav VPAxne Irrigalron System ID 5e use w a'panl b pdM'de•igr. � � '_• l .nrw�xxA rsrt,rAMswAc , - .• .mrs„w,caFEm,.emeRNE ro� _ SIGN( ...- 1 ♦ awrEN:�caKxoRDlAx,rraEn„mm f PLANTING ACCENT \ �. IxBOxeRD hPewMvrvE U -� GN(S) n / I I _ �R,.a nrKKalwrMl',xLV•'BWBUrroY. UE _ �MJy1Att11�� ,V,+rFDJVArIxsENA0.E . 1~ y anEn raeA PtMn+DY swoE meE __ °.'"ba,aaR.w,YwWDOD.aa .AE mN.P,E' Es Low Colorful/Shrubs 8 G.C.Q Signage TYP I 1 J 11- , i . 1 - ------n roIT n-ac s»ErYE�',aEm Scale:1”=20'-0 .�, I .I ' `°" N,Fx,r,r.wA.EMMwEI 23 35 141-4 I I :,• I I , � I I ' �r� - --. � X ;/ _ � C GaMcx' EK.EDONVWs i Z 1 r��,,�I I��,•k,,� G4:, '. }�I I"C rtmt• re,ewNrEAs evER•emrr EOF1Ax IU i . - G'S4uLD"w RaaM RFD n A.Ldlw I r I -- ,. ' mILDEPrn pl lOe�F,v�rtWiRVMrtOµADibOt�MGE I IQ _. , .MTOs•P,Vu,rnxuv b•,,.v,xALATEDLbJt NDE ' �� - - ' � rp4FDP0UNrpMAf1165DeLLxMBIrEI P" m .1 r FEx6Ka1, basI HF..xRDu,.NreRws Hvewo ox.uT W OUTDOOR SEATING AREAJDETAIL FS NNanr•an nLLE anon r LCL�1 I _ MAF•wnArtrRx:Mus wrtovvwr,wceunr.anMFa,oc•.aercloE _._ _ ____ .e..o�+oasarc,.roLP.c..owARFHe.+en.w�wx, t r , _.. I i.. Y/ I ,FD.LrnMm.F. _� U xr a weap,ss ACCE AN,IHD 7t sEEnrt"nq•r,.rinREeB _ - �­NaDz ..DEFEoc1,F. � /,,., ew,nlr.7 � . . -0FeaeKDDRrDR,N�,LAr Q _ — — -- -- Boulders Dlacedasshown i 66 1e"-14"Diameter {y„} Native grey/while rounded Cobble Stones 6r X 4•-12"Diameter Mixed Sizes W Z' •��. — w` ,a . OUTDOOR SEATING AREAIOETAI _ .1 c•>cN sa» aR• I Q , {fff/ fff MMM ,�. wMams0ln GeedLMMc• tau• � •-we � �i fy' I w.. _ / .«.wF.• J/ e .ww M dmwP,'�m.l ax.x s — _ 4✓/ Z t U Irh S T R F 7 7TH STREET DRC2013-00565 SURFACESIMEA. LANDSCAPE WATER USE CALLS.: SUBTPM19450 .TOTAL OVER ALL LANDSCAPE AREA:105,156 SO F7 MAK _ANNOAL A"6L ATERALLOWIMCE 27%TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA (55.-•yQ)XI K'D 3 B•.0..A1 MAWA�x,50t,54x GALLONS Pm Y•a LandArq,Illc, LANDSCAPE CONCEPTUAL PLAN HYDROZOMEY••Qea B.F.-OW WA ERUlETREEa HHR 86 B.'MdAeMAWSu eE SCHEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY EST—TaD AP� 9e LIE" 9F{LAp W 1Cµ0N1ATgx6 pADMneb gGpaaZ1599t26 SCHEU STEEL 7TH STREET BUSINESS CENTER P°°Ox 2so "TIM Ba.e]a GALLONB Pw Ye. Emw InufW$a baa mm 30' so UPLAND.CA 91755 vD1102ONEYxSxS.ere Br.MED N'A,eR UDC TNECO/aPws ® °' s' ' Ph—9°9,981,8933 EXT 712 13TINATE.APPLIED WATER USE LGYIIII CALCIRATMMI6 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AT1N•DAWN KHANOVAN :;ybajpp�B y:y�Y°1" TOTAL EAWU"I.081.E66GAL.ON9 PerYear 1 EA%L TOTAL OFI.O01.9660ALLON61B LESS'HAN 2/21/2014 TIM NAWA OF x.EM. GAL I L � 1 - z a On o v a W J � a d n z NORTH FACING ELEVATION 7 p y o J s� W mU W =o Now Ll i -o, ^��_� j ELEVATIONS ar<oxio six 11 NORTH FACM ELEVATION w•' 3 � 1 MII CttFTLG TITIT"I ' awnxt� -t!� d i ou.mnapeo ' e a t 1 EAST FACING ELEVATION 5 A m ��1lE�� �Ih1� �I ■_ I o0 ®� � ee■r_ee�ll��ll �eelsee ®��� ' � o�l���I e ��:�M�.�:: � I� . A�II����IM�Ii� :'hIIA ���" ...�I��� ��L __ ��� IP•� WEST FACING ELEVATION ftISH LEGEND �o O 20 cc go 10 ;'j EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES (1) . uj sc I■�r���rrrrrr.II II_ _-- Ilr�rrrr� ■rr■Irr��I - . rrtiw�r , ��� �� a ��� n��■��! ins� � ■�..�..■ i� � ii ■ ■ SOUTH • ®© © ELEVATIONS BtXDNQ SIX _ rtlielieltlileir1 ' - �� 77-1 T 7777- 7 T r,7 7 . . . . . 1 ji- ELEVATIONWEST FACING �© m ice® TIM iii MimeFINISH LEGEND �1� r ..�..� �—■��■ y - NORTH FACING ELEVATION �o EMM MEN EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES WEST FACING 0o na ' ELEVATION-" A _F ao ■ ®®®■®■■ ®! ®®®® ■®g®®■ NEW ■■E® OMNIlii 11 sp 1 lig 1 �� ,� 1�1®�� �.. ��► (III�I�Ic ��.: 11�11��� �. � . i`� ���I�II •111�Ii1��� rt ���� ���1��� � � . . O 'F'" SEEM dill FINISH LEGEND r-I NONE � NEENEENMEN ENEE'� -j EXTERIOR ELEVA71ON NOTES 4L WEST FACING ELEVATION 15 EAST FACING ELEVATION 1 '10-1 mom I SOUTH FACING ELEVA71ON m a. .. - Rl.:F.F, Wings IMME Nil m ■ 11 E11ml���■ 111 1 . 0 LEGENDn-H FACING-ELEVATION FINISH �o ELEVATIONEXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES -WEST FACING �o ®© -■�� E ON■■ � ■ , ,- NDN ■� � ■■ - � a� irl I MEMEM ■ N ■�■-■■ -■fi t _. Wild r^ -r I � - own MINIM NORTH FACING ELEVATION t � FINISH LEGEND Z •...... _.._.; � � ...... ........ __'- . ner�vmra4u+w�uew I WW Lk, Y a i I 1 ,_I EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES W _m v W U N C i WEST FACING ELEVATION ."., 15 EAST FACING ELEVATION v:" 7 3 r i tr +AV y i/ _ -. I ELEV . � - -..�-: BULDM NG TWO 0 -sa r-- r--� v �R I t� � l oRttaLLae6M f II l A-5.2 SOUTH FACING ELEVATION s 5 m as ■�� Iii � ■ I I■■� ■� I■■I��In��ll■■■� ■■� .��� TT M-771 1 NORTH FACING ELEVATION �o LEGENDRNISH CL No jo 1 ]ILL LU � i EXTERIOR■� YY YY • • �© • R� TYPICAL ELEVATION A. ACCENT(DARK)DUNN EDWARDS CECl6L DESERT GRAY LRV 36 i S. ACCENT(MEDIUM)DUNN EDWARDS DE6201 i EGYPTIAN SAND LRV 40 C. FIELD(LIGHT)DIM- EDWARDS DE6 05 STUJ'O TAN LRV 68 F. CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM MULLIONS G MEDIUM PE;Z-ORMANCE BLUE REFLECTIf I'INSULATED GLAZING N LIGHT 5ANDBLASTED CONCRETE FINISH LEGEND SCHEU STEEL SUPPLY COMPANY DRC-2013-00565 �-�'J m X UNIFORM Sign Progra W SCHEu BUSINESS CENTER 7TH & ARCHIBALD RANCHO CUCAMONGA Prepared . 303 Wes Main Street RO.Box 9297 Ontario,California 91762 DRC-2013-00565 800-791-1187 SUBTPM 19450 Fax 909-988-6376 40329 Revision 4/9/14 STATE LICENSE #947727 I# i; I I UNIFORM zgn Program 1 SCHEU BUSINESS CENTER 7TH & ARCHIBALD RANCHO CUCAMONGA a F Table of Contents Purpose&Compliance Requirements pg.1 Approvals pg.1 General Criteria&Standards pg.1 Sign Specifications&Installation Requirements pg.2 _ Property Tenant Identification Signs pg.3 Building Address Numbers pg.3 {' . Prohibited Signs pg.3 Site Plan pg.4 Cl)� Building 1 Elevations pg.5 Building 2 Elevations Pg.6 3! Building 3 Elevations pg.7 QBuilding 4 Elevations pg.8 Building 5 Elevations pg.9 U1 � Building 6 Elevations pg.10 Tenant Sign Exhibit A(Building 1-5) pg.11 Tenant Sign Exhibit B(Building 6) pg.12 Property Identification Sign Exhibit C1 pg.13 jl 1 Property Identification Sign Exhibit C2 pg.14 J Building Address Number Exhibit D pg.15 Prepared by:l Ontario,AFncore 303 Wes'Main Street 297 DRC-2013-00565 ,1-1187 , SUBTPM 19450 Fax 909-988-6376 45329 Revision 4/9/14 STATE LICENSE #947727 �I I 1 UNIFORM Sign Program Purpose e & Compliance Requirements i� This Uniform Sign Program(USP)has been established for the purpose of maintaining a continuity of quality and aesthetics throughout the development for the mutual benefit of all tenants.No person shall erect,re-erect,construct,enlarge,move,improve,convert or equip any sign or structure,or cause or permit the same to be done contraryto or in violation of any of the provisions of this Uniform Sign Program.Conformance will be strictly enforced by the landlord and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.All such non-conforming or unapproved sign(s)must be brought into conformance at the expense of the tenant responsible for the installation of said sign(s)with thirty(30)days of written notice of non-compliance. I Note:This development will be completed in phases.Developer/owner reservesthe rightto adjustthis Uniform Sign Program to conform to any architectural changes in future phases. Approvals r I Prior to the fabrication and/or installation of any sign within the development,the building tenant shall obtain City of Rancho Cucamonga approvals,including the issuance of a sign 1 permit.The City may refuse approval for any sign that is not designed in accordance with the specifications as described in this approved USP,or for a sign(s)that is/are in conflict with other applicable City codes and requirements. City approval shall be required for all signs.Sign approval shall be obtained from the Planning Department.Three(3)sets of plans providing the following details shall be submitted for City review and approval: 1.Written approval(or signed drawings)from Building Owner(or its designee). 2.Site plan indicating location of signs. 3.Scaled building elevation(s)showing sign placement and dimensions.Digital photographs depicting proposed signs superimposed on building elevations are acceptable. 4.Colored production/installation drawings for each sign indicating dimensions,all material specifications and finishes,colors,etc. 5.Section detail of sign showing method of attachment to the wall. Only licensed and insured sign contractors shall be permitted to furnish signs for tenants. a ? General Criteria & Standards 1.For buildings 1-5,tenant signs shall consist of replaceable sign panels upon which dimensional individual letters shall be mounted. See page 3 for more detail. . III 2.For building 6,signs shall consist of flush mounted non-illuminated reverse pan aluminum letters.See page 3 for more detail. 3.Tenants shall pay for all signs,their installation and maintenance. 4.All sign work is to be furnished by licensed sign contractors. S.Tenant's sign contractor shall not commence installation of any exterior sign without permits from the City. 6.Design and layout requires approval from Building Owner(or its designee)and City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to installation. 7.Colors and fonts shall be subject to Landlord and City approval. 8.Window signs,banners,prohibited signs and other matters not covered in this USP shall follow the provisions of the City's Municipal Code. 303 West Main Street 9.No sign company logos/labels will be permitted on exposed surfaces of the sign. P.O.Box 9297 Ontario, DRC-2013-00565 800-791-1187 " SUBTPM 19450 �g 48329 Recision 419/14 STATE LICENSE#947727 Pg. 1 UNIFORM ;_sign Program l :t Sign Specifications & Installation Requirements Buildings 1-5 Signs shall consist of replaceable sign panels upon which dimensional individual letters shall be mounted.The panels are required to minimize damage to the building fascia. Building 1,West corner tenant,shall be allowed(2)signs. (1)panel on the South Elevation as main ID, and(1)matching on the West Elevation.All other tenants in buildings 1-5 shall have a maximum of(1)sign panel per tenant. Specifications are as follows: 1.Permanent sign brackets shall be furnished by the landlord and shall be permanently affixed to the building fascia.No other mounting method will be approved. 2.Tenant sign panel: a)Tenant sign panels shall be in the approved locations as specified on pages 5-9 and only on the portion of the building leased/rented/owned by the occupant. b)A 46"high x 96"wide sign panel shall be furnished by the tenant and shall be constructed of 1/8"thick aluminum with a primed and painted finish to match building fascia.Panels will be mounted onto provided brackets approximately 1"off the building fascia. c)Tenant copy shall be non-illuminated 1/2 inch thick acrylic with a painted finish,mounted flush to the surface of the panel using a combination of VHB tape and silicone and/or pins. d Maximum tenant copy area shall be 34"x 84",maintaining a 6"clearance from all edges and shall be limited to business name,Federal or State registered name and/or logo. Design,layout,fonts and color requires approval from Building Owner(or its designee)and City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to installation. e)Maximum total sign square footage per tenant,per elevation shall not exceed 20 square feet. f)Maximum 3 lines of copy with a minimum of 8 inch letters and a maximum of 18 inch copy per individual row. ,rt 6.Door graphics including logo,business name and hours of operation,may not exceed 4 square feet of door glass surface. CD 7.All signs and their installation shall comply with all local building codes and this USP. ZI 7 For more detail refer to page 11. 6 Building 6 Sign(s)for this building only,shall be non-illuminated,reverse pan,individual letters and/or logos with the following specifications: 1.Building 6 tenant,shall be allowed(2)signs,one on the west elevation as its primary identification and one on the south elevation as its secondary identification. 2.Signs shall have 3"deep aluminum returns,and aluminum faces with a painted satin finish. 3.Signs shall be flush mounted to fascia using lag bolts with wall anchors,in the approved locations as specified on page 10. 4.Maximum sign area shall be no larger than 48"tall by 180"wide and may consist of 1 or 2 lines copy.One line of copy shall have letters no taller than 30" and two lines with copy no taller than 24".See page 12. 5.Logos or symbols shall be no larger than 30". 6.Sign(s)shall be limited to business name,Federal or State registered name and/or logo. Prepared by: 7.Maximum total sign square footage per tenant,per elevation shall not exceed 60 square feet. 8.Door graphics including logo,business name and hours of operation,may not exceed 4 square feet of door glass surface. 9.All signs and their installation shall comply with all local building codes and this USP. For more detail refer to page 12. 3 West Main Street .� Ontario,.Box 9297 DRC-2013-00565 Fox �r -988-6376 R) SUBTPM 19450 -791-1187 .r. 48329 Revision 4/9/14 STATE LICENSE #947727 Pg. 2 i& Property Identification Signs UNIFORM Sign Rrogra��. One double faced non-illuminated monument signs and one single faced,identifying the development and its tenants,shall be installed on 7th Street,a minimum of 300 feet apart. The following is a list of requirements and restrictions for monument signs on the property: 1.Monuments sign C1,shall be constructed of concrete with 1"deep debossed letters. 2.Monuments sign C2,signs shall be constructed out of aluminum with painted finish,with flat cut out letters. 3.The maximum height shall be no taller than 8 feet. Refer to Property Identification Sign Exhibit on page 13. Building Address Numbers Address numbers are required for each building and are as specified: 1.Minimum 12"tall numbers. 2.Shall be flat cut out numbers; a)Yz"thick clear acrylic b)Painted to match TBD CD CD c)Pin mounted flush d)Externally illuminated ° Ill 3.Flush mounted to fascia in approved specified locations. 6 For more details see page 15. al tb Prohibited Signs 1.Cabinet signs,vinyl or any type of foam letters or signs painted directly on monument sign panels or building walls. 2.Off premise signs placed on the property or on any public right-of-way. 3.Wall signs projecting above the parapet or roof lines. 4.Flashing,moving audible signs. S.Signs which are not architecturally compatible with the architecture of the development. 6.Vehicle signs that are for the express purpose of directing,advertising,and/or providing additional identification for a tenant or the property. 7.Light bulb strings. 8.Signs constituting traffic hazards either within the property lines or at the street. 9.Graphics,banners,posters or advertising of any type on windows,walls,doors or any freestanding devices(e.g."sandwich boards"or"inflatables"). Prepared by: P.O.303 West Main Street Ontario,California 91762 DRC-2013-00565 800-791-1187 SUBTPM 19450Fax 909-988-6376 38329 Revision 4/9/14 STATE LICENSE#947727 Pg. 3 UNIFORM Sign Program Site Plan LEGEND TENANT SIGN MAJOR TENANT CI PROPERTY MAJOR TENANT ^s'ADDRESS NUMBERS LOCATION SIGN LOCATION IDENTIFICATION SIGN LOCATION AND OPTIONAL LOCATION ---- ar_ACu _STREET + ❑ _ !1 S CD 'I— m cn w s w T_._R-. .- v,l f " t •Cl[] 'fir. 'n t� etMl i' I _ y ' i Dv A 'D AD red by: D li a 11 D D B _ 5 (AE�Ancore _. �] J -j 1 303 West Main �,,.. r---'I I a'.+�•+` '4 DRC-2013-00565 Ontario,California 91762 SUBTPM 19450 :00 -791-1187 Fox 909-988-6376 R STATE LICENSE #947727 Pg. 4 © COPYRIGHT 2014 UNIFORM ,'Sign Prograin BUILDING '' North Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0"�•-� � ����� rt (D 3 m I L7 _ rn East Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" 0 a0PTIONPL .m.South Elevation-.._.m.,_,>-.-.....�m...:,�..,..-......_..................��...,..�,.m.. ,..M,,..,..,.m.om.,,,..,.....,.�.,.._..,..,, ,.....,..,,..,,......,.,.m...,.T.,,...�..�. Scale 1/32"=1'-0" Prepared by: A Encore P.O.I pql, I I pg I 1:[� 303 West Main 5troot Ontario, DRG-2013-00565 800-791-1187 SUBTPM 19450 _ 76 _. m .... .- . .� �..,... Fox 909-988-63 48329 West Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" Revision 4/9/14 STATE LICENSE #947727 Pg. 5 UNIFORM Sign Protrram BUILDING 2 I I TrP111pnimpiTPHIRA North Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" (D fD j ral H riq 11 m � East Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" A A A A [JA D - !° ti a� South Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0"�� Prepared Encore 303 W—t Win Stmet P.O.Box 9297 Onorio,California 91762 DRC-2013-00565 800-791-1187 SUBTPM 19450Fax 909-988-6376 48329 ^West Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" Revision 4/9/14 STATE LICENSE #947727 Pg. 6 u UNIFORM Sign Pr ograin BUILDING North Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" rt fD m rn East Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" N 00 o A acs 00 00 00 D OPTIONAL South Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" Prepared OWe�t Main Street P.O.Ontario, DRC-2013-00565 800-791-1187 SUBTPM19450 ..A� m :.m a_ Fox 909-988-6376 48329 West ElevationScale 1/32"=1'-0" Revision 4/9/14 STATE LICENSE #947727 Pg. 7 UNIFORM ,,sign Program 11 BUILDING 4 A A A A A QA North Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" m I w East Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" w (D - ----- — ---- - ----- - — D OPn0NAL knim- South Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" Prepared P.O.303 West Main Street Ontario, DRC-2013-00565 800-791-1187 SUBTPM 19450 Fax 909-988-6376 West Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" revision 4/9/14 STATE LICENSE #947727 Pg. 8 UNIFORM Sign Program BUILDING ---I I I I I I Ffr(111 OPTIONAL t=7 C TIT. 11rmrmIIrfl North Elevation m.....-,�,-...- _m..,...�.•._.... .._...l�..�....�....�.,..��m,-•-�n�� Scale 1/32"=1'-0" END CID 3 m rn East Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" A �mw I r South Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" Prepared more P.O.303 West Win Street • ' DRC-2013-00565 800-791-1187 SUBTPM 19450Fax 909-988-6376 _.. .,..e... ....m.....,.,...,,.... ,p,.,l..m.... ....,A...._.,...,•,,.,•.,,..�....,,.�,.s.,..,...,..�, m. .,m,�,..w..R.,,_,,,.e..•. 48329 West Elevation Scale 1/32"=1'-0" Revision 4/9/14 STATE LICENSE 11947727 Pg. 9 F i UNIFORM Sign Prograxi-i BUILDING O I.�. .SAI �ii�a�i■i i 1 ■iiiiiiii ------ ------■il L—L: K'�r_th Elevation I- i4e�ii�i�'> ■ li�_sia�al�®1i■®�ie�a1------■'�--11 11■■■■��■ ■ills■e■-11■■— ��'■ �■■ �le■ul�■��■�I■■u�l■■-1�■�i��le■-11■e ulle■nl�■■■■� _ (,��I�II�Al� ■.� �11�1 �..�� ��11�1 .�� rr..rr �'11�■AI�IM� CD .illlll�II�II� NOll!l� I�I o6 East Elevation o Cn ■®_ r ®�i ■■■■�� ■■■II■■■.■.11■■■■■.I��ll®� .■■■■ell�AA�I s�oa®1!®!!®��® �1 ;�as�si F�if®ii�t��i■I >_..-..-. �..� ...�1i■■■II■�■�■��■ :1■II■Heb I` II�II�II�III�I illi iilii �i63� �i .��ii �ii , Y IIS �II�II!!'�hi ; West Elevation0 iiiit- -Fj o • L. �i,� ,i�i�■■■■�I■.■..■ Ilt.,� �� ,I+I��� .all....■.E,I_■■■■iii Encore II■■■■� i 'L 1(I■4 ,-■ a�� J�i-.� �u -�� I M A G E �.� � �■LIr.+6i..�v■ AA AI s� � �■'Y�it+'ilifiliiih fi■' 303 West Main Street �1rF4<,r �t(� ,� -1ii i''>I,-i!1II �I '11' ' 1,I Ontario,California 91762 DRC-2013.„SUBTPM 1-450 800-791-1187 r Fax 909-988-6376 48329 South Elevation Scale r www.encoreimage.com ��110.YO, Re�isi.n 4/9/14 STATE LICENSE N947727 Pg. 10 UNIFORM Sign Program. Tenant Sign ExhibitA�(Buildings 1-5) 96"PANEL 94"MAX COPY AREA HORIZONTAL RUNNING MOUNTING BRACKET _ SECTION _J6"CLEARANCE f f- DETAIL r----- ------- ---------------i (ALL SIDES) r I U LU LU Q I W m z Z 0 Z fD d V/ I •imbN•f•u••rMS—k. i d X �F M F RC) I Z d -A-R- /-LJL-E-_R--!aI� 1 •'. _ d CD HORIZONTAL RUNNING MOUNTING BRACKET •TENANT COPY IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY m SIZE p� SCALE Y2"=1'-0" LANDLORD PROVIDED I" ALUMINUM MOUNTING BRACKET TENANT PROVIDED ALUMINUM PANEL,TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH FASCIA WITH Prepared SATIN FINISH ncore TENANT PROVIDED Ih"DEEP FLAT CUT OUT ACRYLIC West Main Street TENANT NAME f Ontario,3P.O.Box 9297 DRC-2013-00565 800-791-1187 SUBTPM 19450 - — Fax 909-988-6376 48329 SECTION DETAIL Revision 4/9/14 ........._..�...._..._..-_... _.....-..._._T��..�_.�,. - STATE--_..._.._-.__._.. ._._. ._________ ..._.._Y.__._..�-.-.......-.__._..--._�_.... .___- Pg• 11 SCALE NTS UNIFORM Sign Progra... Tenant Sign Exhibit B (Building 6) � i 180"MAX SIGN AREA i------------------------------------------------- z S 2 N � i 1 FARMERS ---------------------------------- --------------- • LOGO HEIGHT MAX 30", SINGLE LINE LETTER HEIGHT MAX 30- (D 5 DOUBLE LINE LETTER HEIGHT MAX 24" M m '•TENANT COPY IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY n SIZE �l SCALE 3/8"=1'-O" 3 _ LAG BOLTS INTO WALL ANCHORS i 'i 3"DEEP ALUMINUM x REVERSE PAN P LETTERS/LOGOPrepared by: ncore I"ANGLE BRACKETS FOR FLUSH MOUNT MR.` TO FASCIA 303 West Main Street • WT FASCIA Ontario, DRC-2013-00565 800-791-1187 SUBTPM 19450Fax 909-988-6376 48329 SPECIFICATIONS Revision 4/9/14 _.. _....,_.,._..__.. ___. STATE LICENSE #947727 Pg. 12 SCALE NTS UNIFORM Sign Program Property Identification Sign Exhibit C1 ukk '1 m SCHEU BUSINESS CENTER h o c� M North To co ADDRESS NUMBERS 1, PreparedT MA . GDouble sided monument sign __ m Color and layout for rendering purposes only /z"=1'-0"Scale Ontario,303 West Main Street P.O.Box 9297 DRC-2013-00565 800-791-1187 SUBTPM 19450 Fax 909-988-6376 A$329 Revision 4/4/1/ STATE LICENSE #947727 Pg. 13 UNIFORM Sigma. Program Property Identification Sign Exhibit C2 J 3} W Prepared by: �Ir m _ a i nr70 Single sided monument sign • *Color and layout for rendering purposes only t/z"=1'-O"Scale 303 West Main Street P.O. Ontario, DRC-2013-00565 800-791-1187 SUBTPM 19450Fax 909-988-6376 48324 Revision 4/9/14 STATE LICENSE #947727 Pg. 14 UNIFORM Sign hq,-o gr-um Building Address Numbers Exhibit @ H z; N123FONT: SWISS721 BLKCN BT SIZE SCALE 1"=1%A CD fD 1 Vz"FLAT CUT OUT m CLEAR ACRYLIC Cl 0 O COLOR TBD Prepared by: I LEGEND J2I CONCRETE FASCIA 303 West Main Street V FLAT CUT OUT CLEAR ACRYLICP.O.Box 9297 Ontario, DRC-2013-00565 _ 3 STUD MOUNTED INTO WALL USING SILICONE 00 -791-1187 SUBTPM 19450 3 909-988-6376 48329 SPECIFICATIONS ATTACHMENTS Revision 4/9/14 _.,T�_.... ...,..�.....,.,.,_. T-�--_ _ ,, _._„-„�,_ .,._._ ...,-..-_._.—... —...- .----•----. STATE LICENSE #947727 Pg. 15 SCALE NTS DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Dominick Perez May 20, 2014 • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450 — SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION -A request to subdivide a 13.23-acre parcel to create 3 new parcels within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street - APN: 0209-211-24. Related files: Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00565 — SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION -A request to develop a 6-building industrial complex totaling 173,340 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street - APN: 0209-211-24. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2014-00250 - SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION - A request to establish a Uniform Sign Program in connection with the proposed develop of a 6-building industrial complex totaling 173,340 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast comer of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street - APN: 0209-211-24. Related files: Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450. Site Characteristics: The project area is located on a 13.23-acre vacant undeveloped parcel located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street. The site is abutting existing industrial development to • the north, east, and west and is located to the north, across 7th Street, from an existing multi-tenant industrial complex. The site currently does not contain any trees, and similar to adjacent properties in this area, does contain a gradual slope from north to south. Design Parameters: -The applicant proposes to subdivide the 13.23-acre parcel into three parcels, creating a 2.13-acre parcel (Parcel 1), a 4.82-acre parcel (Parcel 2)and a 5.89-acre parcel (Parcel 3). Parcel 1, which is adjacent to Archibald Avenue and 7th Street is approximately 530 feet wide by 175 feet long. Parcel 2, which is south of and abutting Acacia Street and Cottage Avenue, is approximately 450 feet wide by 615 feet long. Parcel 3, which is adjacent to the existing rail spur along the eastern perimeter of the site, is approximately 400 feet wide by 615 feet long. In addition to the two-lot subdivision of the subject property, the applicant also proposes to develop a.6-building industrial complex totaling 173,340 square feet of building area. Building 1 (15,775 square feet) and Building 2 (13,415 square feet), which are located on Parcel 1, are designed to cater towards businesses looking to occupy buildings that contain a large portion of office with minimal storage area. Building 3 (19,950 square feet), Building 4 (20,500 square feet) and Building 5 (20,391 square feet), which are located on Parcel 2, are designed to cater towards businesses looking to occupy buildings that contain a primarily open warehouse and.storage area with up to 40 percent office area. Building 6 (81,910 square feet), which is located on Parcel 3, is designed with the intent to accommodate one large industrial user, as 76,775 square feet of this building is comprised of a single, open, warehouse, and distribution area. The remaining 5,135 square feet of the building will be used for office area. Lastly, the building will contain multiple shipping and receiving truck bays that will provide vehicular access into the building. • EXHIBIT C DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM19450, DRC2013-00565,AND DRC2014-00250 May 20, 2014 Page 2 The buildings will be comprised of concrete tilt-up walls, portions of which will incorporate decorative sandblasted wall planes as well as vertical and horizontal 2 inch wide reveals that span the length of all elevations. The building will also include clear anodized aluminum mullions that surround the storefront glass windows and doors, all of which are recessed into the front building elevation. Each building, with the exception of Buildings 1 and 2, will have metal roll-up doors that will provide access into the warehouse area of.each unit. The applicant has requested to construct this project in two phases. Phase one will involve the installation of all improvements shown within Parcel 3, the landscape strip adjacent to the 7th Street frontage, and the landscape strip, drive aisle, and drive approach adjacent to the northern property line of the site. Phase two will involve the construction of all remaining improvements, including Buildings 1 through 5, as well as the remaining parking and landscaped areas. The development when completed, will contain a total of 452 provided parking spaces, 27 percent overall landscape coverage, decorative paving at .each drive entrance, and three employee break areas all of which meet the requirements and intent of the Development Code. Additionally, staff notes that the initial submittal of the proposed development did not incorporate rail service improvements that are required by the Development Code for rail adjacent properties. The applicant has since incorporated staffs comments and feedback into the development package, which now includes an optional future rail spur that will tie into the existing rail spur adjacent to the eastern property line should a future tenant at this location have a need for rail service. Lastly, the applicant is requesting to establish a Uniform Sign Program (USP) for this development. The proposed USP contains provisions that regulate permanent building signage for each individual tenant as well as permanent monument signage for property identification. The USP allows for a maximum of one non-illuminated sign for each tenant occupying Building 1 through 5, with the exception of the tenant occupying the space closest to Archibald Avenue in Building 1 that will be allowed to have a total of two building signs. Building 6, which is intended to occupy a single large tenant, will be permitted to have a total of two non-illuminated building signs. The Uniform Sign Program indicates that there will be a total of two property identification (monument) signs, one sign to be located at the northeast comer of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street and the other sign to be located at the southeast comer of the site, adjacent to the end of 7th Street. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. None. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map, Design Review, and Uniform Sign Program. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee recommended approval of the project and had no issues. ; Item E-G72 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM19450, DRC2013-00565, AND DRC2014-00250 May 20, 2014 Page 3 ® Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger Staff Planner: Dominick Perez Item E-G73 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) • �,RANCHO (Please type or print clearly using ink Use the tab key to move from one line to the nextllne.) UCAMONGA Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this.form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed . project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality. Act; and the City's. Rules and. Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this. Application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the:development application, additional information such as, but not limited to,traffic, noise, biological, drainage,and geological reports maybe required: The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identifed special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project.application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study. Part.11 as required by CEQA. In addition to the fling.fee, the applicant will be responsible to-pay or reimburse the City; its agents, officer§,andror . Consultants for. all: costs- for the. preparation, review; analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies.or reports: GENERAL O. INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensue;that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: 3 -0 0 S& q50 Project Title:.Scheu Business Center Phase Vi Name&Address of project owner(s): 50%Allyn Scheu Family Limited Partnership 50% Leland Scheu and Julia S. Scheu, Trustee of the L. & J. Scheu Living Trust dated May 18, 1990 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor: Scheu Management Corporation, PO Box 250, Upland, CA 91785 • EXHIBIT D Page 1 of 10 -- — - ItemE--GT4----- Contact Person&Address. Craig Scheu, POBox 250, Upland, CA 91785 Name&Address of person preparing this form(ifWerent from above): C.R.Camey Archh.itects, Inc(Carl VanDerHoek) 12841 Newport Ave Tustin, CA 92781-2711 Telephone Number. (714)665-9500 Information indicated by an asterisk(•)is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. `1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south,east, and west,• views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): The project is located inside an industrial zone. The lot is a vacant dirt lot 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 02090-211-24 •5) Gross Site Area(adsq. ft.): 13.23 acres `6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 12.85 acres. dedications): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): Not applicable. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 2 of 10 Item E-G75 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental agencies in order to fully implement the project Building permit Sign permit Grading permit 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography,soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological and/or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): Vacant dirt lot that slopes approximately 11'from the north property line to the south property line. There are some trees along the north property line on the adjacent property. No existing structures. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 3 of 10 Item E-G76 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): No historical significance. 11) Describe any noise sources and theirlevels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: Not under the take off or landing pattern of the Ontario airport. Railroad tracks along the east property line. 3.5 blocks away from the 10 freeway. Archibald Ave is along the west property line. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary. New industrial complex consisting of 6 new single story tilt-up concrete buildings. Buildings 1 and 2 are for office type tenants with some storage space. Buildings 3, 4 and 5 are for tenants needing as much office as storage space and have loading areas in the back. Building 6 is for a steel distribution company. The main portion of the building is for distribution and the smaller area is for administrative office. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): North: Industrial buildings with minimal landscaping. East Railroad tracks, large industrial building with a strip of trees along the property line. South: 7th street, multi-tenant industrial complex with landscaping. West: Inside corner is a large warehouse building with no landscaping. West: Archibald Ave., multi-tenant industrial complex with landscaping. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 Item E-G77 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern,scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No. The proposed use is consistent with the surrounding uses. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Unknown '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees. None Applicable-Vacant Land 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains. None Applicable-Vacant Land • 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) Peak use(gal/Day) b. CommerciaMd. (gaUday/ac) 38,550 Peak use(gallmin/ac) 27 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ® Septic Tank x® Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gailday) b. Commerciabindustrial(gaYday/ac) Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 Item E-G78 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units. Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) Anticipated range of sale prices andlorrents: Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent(per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23) indicate anticipated household size by unit type 24) Indicate the expected number of schoolchildren who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary. b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: Buildings 1 -5 -Unknown at this time-Focus is on industrial Building 6-Steel Distribution Center Updated 4/11/2013 Page 6 of 10 Item E-G79 26) Total Boor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: Buildings 1 -5-Office: 57,908 s.f. ; Warehouse: 33, 524 s.f. Building 6-Office: 5,135 s.f.; Warehouse: 76,775 s.f. • 27) Indicate hours of operation: Unknown at this time 28) Number of employees. Total:Building 6 Only-70 to 100 Maximum Shifa`.- Building 6 Only-55 to 65 Time of Maximum Shift: Building 6 Only-6:00 am to 3:30 pm 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): Building 1 -5-Unknown Building 6-Shop$10 to$20/hr, Clerical$30k to$40k/yr, Sales/Admin $50k to$100k/yr 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hind that currently reside in the City:Unknown '31) For commercial and industrial uses only,indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be • verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818)572-6283): Unknown ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water,sewer,fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. Not known at this time. • Updated 4/11/2013 Page 7 of 10 Item E-G80 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use,storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include,but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides and herbicides,fuels,oils,solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. No known history of hazardous or toxic materials use on this site. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary orlong-term use,storage,ordischarge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No. 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: i hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. 1 further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: Signature: Title: ��U Updated 4/11/2013 Page 8 of 10 Item E-G81 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412.gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day Weneral Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 • Updated 4/11/2013 Page 9 of 10 Item E-G82 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 10 of 10 Item E-G83 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL-CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART 11 BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review DRC2013-00565 2. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250 3. Description of Project: A request to develop a 6 building industrial complex totaling 173,340 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land within the General Industrial(GI)District located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street;APN: 0209-211-24. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Scheu Management Company PO Box 250 Upland, Ca 91785 5. General Plan Designation: General Industrial 6. Zoning: General Industrial (GI)District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is surrounded to the north, south, east and west by fully developed site that contain a combination of several industrial and office buildings utilized for industrial and office uses,which are all located within the General Industrial(GI)District. An existing single-family residential community exists west of Archibald Avenue and south of 7th Street located within the Low(L) Residential District. Additionally,there are several existing single- family residential lots located northwest of the subject site approximately 200 feet west of Acacia Street and Cottage Avenue within the General Industrial (GI) District. An existing railway, running north and south, abuts the site to the east. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required(e.g.,permits,financing approval,or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD—California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR— Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report • FPEIR- Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx Nitrogen Oxides Item E-G84 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 2 ROG—Reactive Organic Gases PM10—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD-South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( )Aesthetics ( )Agricultural Resources (x)Air Quality ( ) Biological Resources (x)Cultural Resources (x)Geology&Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions ( ) Hazards&Waste Materials (x) Hydrology&Water Quality ( ) Land Use&Planning ( )Mineral Resources (x) Noise ( ) Population&Housing ( )Public Services ( )Recreation ( )Transportation/Traffic ( )Utilities&Service Systems ( )Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD. NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a Potentially Significant Impact"or Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable'standards,and 2)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the propos d project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: AV Date: t Reviewed By: Date: �t f Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G85 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 3 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Su Information Sources: Potentially With Than PPortin g SignificantMtigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare,which ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) According to General Plan Figure LU-6, the proposed industrial development is adjacent to a view corridor along Archibald Avenue. Staff has determined that the site and building design of the development is consistent with the existing adjacent industrial developments along Archibald Avenue which should create a less than significant impact on the site's adjacent view corridor. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C) The site is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7t' Street and is characterized by industrial development to the north,south,east and west.There is a single- family community southwest of the subject property across Archibald Avenue. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project as the proposed six(6)industrial buildings conform to the City's current design standards and will enhance the visual character of the immediate area. Staff has determined that the architecture of the buildings is consistent with the design standards,guidelines,and policies established by the Planning Commission and City Council. The project complies with the City s technical requirements including floor area ratio;minimum building,parking lot,and wall setbacks;dock and storage area screening;and landscape coverage as described in the Development Code. Approval by the City s Design Review Committee is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project will increase the number of streetlights in the immediate vicinity and the amount of industrial lighting used within the site. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. • Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G86 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant UUgation Significant NO Impact Inco rated Impact Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Caldomia Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (41) Williamson Act contract? C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) () ( ) V) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) V) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located at the northeast comer of Archibald Avenue and 7"'Street and is characterized by industrial development to the north, south, east and west.There is a single-family residential community located southwest of the subject property across Archibald Avenue. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful;therefore,they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land,timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G87 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 5 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wdtThan Significant Mitigatlon Than No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and r Street and is characterized by industrial development to the north, south, east and west. The nearest agricultural use is at the northwest comer of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route about one mile north from the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use.Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project. a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State • ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) () (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the air quality management plan (AQMP) (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) Both the State of California and the federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,io), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter(PM,o and PM2.$)are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide(1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of • safety. Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G88 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:. Sg„��°„ hg With significant niNo Impact Inco orated I Impact impact The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection,a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide(NO2), sulfur dioxide(SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or"non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring'the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM,o and PM2.5. Speck criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air quality study was prepared by LSA in October 2013 that utilizes the CaIEEMod methodology and CEQA Air Quality Handbook,April 1993 to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds,long-term operational emissions, operational emissions for localized significant thresholds,and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Term(Construction) Impacts Total Regional Pollutant Emissions,lbs/day ConstructionROC NO: CO Sox Fugitive Exhaust Fugitive Exhaust Phase PM10 Me PM2.s PM2.5 Site 5.4 58 44 0.042 8.3 3.1 4.5 2.9 Preparation Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G89 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 7 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than significant Mfjgation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im Grading and 7 81 53 0.065 4.1 3.9 1.7 3.6 Excavation Building Construction 6.2 44 50 0.08 3.2 2.5 0.86 2.3 Architectural 37 3.1 5.9 0.01 0.53 0.25 0.14 0.25 Coatin Paving 3.4 25 16 0.025 0.17 1.4 0.045 1.3 Peak Daily 44 81 56 0.09 8.3 3.1 4.5 2.9 Emissions SCAQMD 75 100 550 150 150 150 55 55 Thresholds Significant No No No No No No No No Emissions? ROG=reactive organic gases; NOx=oxides of nitrogen;CO=carbon monoxide;SOx=oxides of sulfur,Mo and PM2.e=particulate matter Source: Air Quality Impact Analysis—Table G LSA Associates,Inc.,October 2013 Ecuipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines,on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving,and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities • envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions are generally associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction.Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity,the speck operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors.The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain ROCs which are similar to VOCs and are part of the 03 precursors. There will be six(6) industrial buildings proposed for the project. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed.buildings will result in approximately 37' lbs of ROCs per day during the coating phase. The emissions would occur after grading activities, near the end of the construction period. Therefore, this ROC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD ROC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, • the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G90 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 8 Less Than slgnificant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than 5grdficant IWtigafion Significant No impact In orated Im aet impact mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the expected uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurrina Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore,the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures(short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition,fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)on a project- speck basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G91 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 9 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact I act 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB))daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide(NO2), Ozone(03),and Particulate Matter(PM2.5 and PM,o)would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance;therefore,they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Lona Term (Operational) Impacts Long Term Project Operational Emissions Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes.The proposed project would result in Rev 2-26-13 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 10 Less Than Significant Lass Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Impact a net increase in the number of industrial buildings/uses in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area.Based on trip generation factors included in the traffic study that was prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc.on June 24,2014,long-term operation emissions associated with the proposed project, calculated with the CaIEEMod methodology shows that the increase of all criteria pollutants as a result of the proposed project would be less than the corresponding SCAQMD daily emission thresholds.Therefore, project-related long-term air quality impacts would not be significant. Mitigation measures would not be required. Pollutant Emissions,Ibslday ROC NO, co SO, PM10 Pmu Area Sources 13 0.0002 0.019 0 0.00007 0.00007 Energy Sources 0.26 2.3 2 0.014 0.18 0.18 Mobile Sources 2.9 14 38 0.071 4.6 1.4 Total 16 16 40 0.085 4.8 1.6 SCAOMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significant No No No No No No ROG=reactive organic gases;NOx=oxides of nitrogen;CO=carbon monoxide; SOx=oxides of sulfur, PMio and PM2.5=particulate matter Source:Air Quality Impact Analysis—Table J LSA Associates, In.,October 2013 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures(long term) Lona Term (Operational) Emissions - The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore,would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities. to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 2) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 3) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 4) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 5) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 6) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G93 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 11 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mtigation Significant No Impact lncorpmted Impact Impact 7) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods(i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 8) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 9) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 10) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.3). C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR(Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General • Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 0.25-mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 0.25-mile of sensitive receptors, including existing residential communities located to the southwest of the project,across Archibald Avenue,and to the northwest of the site, northwest of Acacia Street at the northwest project boundary, as well as a church that provides child care services, which is located northwest of Archibald Avenue and Acacia Street. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b)above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term)are typically associated with the type of use. The proposed project involves the construction of six (6) industrial and office buildings that will allow for various office, business and professional as well as various industrial warehouse/distribution uses. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and therefore are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Typically, warehouse/distribution activities do not create objectionable odors that are normally • associated with heavy manufacturing operations. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G94 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) () ( ) (✓) through habitat modifications,on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat.or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,coastal,etc.)through direct removal,filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local., regional.,or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street and is characterized by industrial development to the north,south,east and west.There is a single- family community southwest of the subject property across Archibald Avenue. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments as well as annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR,the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G95 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 13 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With gati Than Significant M'itiga4on Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Im act d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large,contiguous natural open space areas.Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence.Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of a historical resource as defined in§ 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to§ 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) { ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24(Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site;however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G96 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 14' Les Than SigMcant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: aignifi nt "�"' Than p g Sigruficent Mitigacon Significant No Impact IMMMW ftmd Impact Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites,capping or covering sites with soil,planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. C) The General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.6)indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological.sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to,the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded,divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery,the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). e Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga.. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Rev 2-26-13 . Item E-G97 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 15 Less Than • Significant Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Inca orated Impact Impact d) The proposed project is undeveloped and is surrounded by land that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. • ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) ✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? . ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 1.8 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5.3 miles north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing MW 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. • Also, the San Jacinto fault,capable of producing up to MH,7.5 earthquakes is about 17.5 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to MN,8.2 earthquakes, is about Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G98 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wn, Than pp 9 Significant Mitigation IS, gnifieant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 19.5 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area per Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April,which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand,resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.7)indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam (HbA) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam (HbA) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically stable. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to,and be served by,the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G99 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ORC2013-00565 Page 17 Less Than ® Significant Less Potentially and Supporting Information Sources: Poteally WithThanSignificant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) () indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Regulations and Significance -The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat.601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG")emissions reduction target in Executive Order(EO)S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010;GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1)that GHGs endanger human health; and (2)that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CHa], nitrous oxide [N20], hydrofluorocarbons [HFCs], perfluorocarbon [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]. The combined emissions of these • well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western States, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit(OF)over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to • global climate change.Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G100 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact hico,poi ted Impact Impact proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4).Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station.The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PM1o, PM2.5, and S02which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station.The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's- Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of Califomis Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality Impact Analysis prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. in October 2013, the project would result in the following emissions of 6 possible emissions including carbon dioxide [CO21, carbon dioxide equivalent [CO2e], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N20], biologically generated CO2 from decomposing solid waste [Bio-CO2], and non-biologically generated CO2 [NBio-CO2] and would not result in the other GHG's. As seen in the table below the proposed project would result in a total of 40 MTCO2e/yr from construction activities and 0.0048 MTCO2e/yr for area sources and 1,000 MTCO2e/yr for mobile sources. Total project related direct operation emission would result in 3,800 MTCO2e/yr. Pollutant Emissions, MT/year Category Bio-0O2 Nbio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Construction emissions amortized over 30 ears 0 40 40 0.0053 0 40 Area . 0 0.0045 0.0045 0.00001 1 0 1 0.0048 JEnergy 0 2,500 2,500 0.1 0.028 2,500 Mobile 0 1,000 1,000 0.037 0 1,000 Waste 33 0 33 1.9 0 74 Water 13 150 160 1.3 0.032 200 Total Pro'ect Emissions 46 3,700 3,700 3.3 0.06 3,800 Source:Air Quality Impact Analysis—Table L LSA Associates,In.,October 2013 Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G101 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 19 Less Than • Significant Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Ponifica t With rnic Significant Mltigafion Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel- powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cha, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low- emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures'specification. • 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Lona Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles,combustion of natural gas for space and water heating,as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for"adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project involves the construction of six (6) industrial warehouse buildings totaling approximately 173,000 square feet and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation(more than 80 percent and less than • 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G102 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: g ficant g0cm s,�a� No IrMact IncorporatM Impact Impact recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping; shade trees;bike racks; and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping; shade trees; bike racks; walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB)375. The project's long term operation emissions will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed any of the SCAQMD's thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a significant long term impact with the following mitigation measures: 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound(VOC)materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; Increased insulation, Y Limit air leakage through the structure, Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, Y Install light colored"cool" roofs and cool pavements, Install solar or light emitting diodes(LED's)for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G103 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: �tnifica t with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Invact Im act • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets,dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project involves the construction of six (6) industrial warehouse buildings totaling approximately 173,000 square feet. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures,link transportation opportunities,promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project will incorporate multiple design features that ultimately assist in lowering GHG emissions including: shade trees; bike racks; walkways that provide • accessibility to public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools and therefore is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council.The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? • Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G 104 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant MGligation Significant No Irmad IF orated Im ect I act e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted,within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project. result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes.This is usually associated with individual households,small business operations,and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would7use paints,solvents,acids,curing compounds,grease,and oils.These materials would be stored and used at individual sites.The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that.meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal,State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than- significant. The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There is a school located within 0.25-mile of the project site. The project site is within .1 miles of the nearest existing or proposed school, which is located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Acacia Street.The project will be required to comply with existing State and Federal standards on the use and transport of hazardous materials.The proposed buildings are to be constricted as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G105 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Iiligation Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Impact at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS- 7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 1.8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. The proposed project involves the development of six. (6) industrial building with the tallest building having a maximum height of 39 feet. This meets the requirements set forth within the General Plan and applicable Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan which requires structures within the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan to have a maximum height of 70 feet. Therefore, Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) V) ( ) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? • Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G106 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 24 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g significant Mtigation Significant No Im act Incorporated. Impact Impact C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) g). Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche,tsunami, or mudflow? Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project,a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G107 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 25 Less Than ® Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact- s m act• Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES,the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Dan Guerra and Associates in September 2013, which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans,and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: • Construction Activities. 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)specifically identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs)that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a)Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b)An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction,temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order • to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G108 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Si�eeM M6g�on si�fican< No Impact Incorp Imoact impact 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Dan Guerra and Associates on September 4, 2013 to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Post- Construction Operational., 1) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Dan Guerra and Associates in September 2013 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years,shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD,approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will.require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.9),continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore,the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities,which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G109 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 27 Less Than ® Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a • Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargees Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and.local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. No adverse impacts are expected. • Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G110 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 28 Less Than significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially g d� s; c ,� Impact Inco orated impact Impact 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project. a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) () (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the northeast comer of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street and is characterized by industrial development to the north, south,east and west. This project will be of similar design and size to the surrounding industrial development to the north, south, east and west The project will become a part of the larger industrial area community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is General Industrial. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is for the construction of six (6) industrial warehouse buildings totaling 173,340 square feet which is currently vacant undeveloped land. The development of the site with industrial buildings will be consistent with the land use designations as described in the Development Code and General Plan. The minimum building, parking lot, landscape and wall setbacks; and landscape coverage are consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1;therefore,there is no impact. Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G111 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 29 Less Than ® Signlfieant Less Potentially and Supporting Information Sources: P° ntfally WithThan Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Imicact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted,within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to • excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project involves the development of an industrial complex totaling 173,340 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land within the General Industrial (GI) District located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street.The subject property is surrounded by existing industrial development to the north, south, east and west, which are also within the General Industrial (GI) District. Similar to a majority of the surrounding businesses, the proposed project does not involve any outdoor work or storage area. All future businesses that will be established at this location will be conducted within fully-enclosed buildings, which will ultimately reduce noise levels to within the standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. No adverse impacts expected. In any event, the mitigation measures listed below will further reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-sign cant levels: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the'City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 PM until 7 AM. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G112 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 30 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially win, Than Pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No InTact IncorporaW Impact Impact garbage cans,or other similar objects between the hours of 10 PM and 7 AM in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. b) The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. The City's Development Code requires thatall industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed building; hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby commercial uses is expected. However,at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and schools.As such, no impacts are anticipated. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Noise from the site will most likely be generated by truck traffic and loading area activities—all other activities will be conducted within the buildings. The subject property is surrounded by existing industrial development to the north,south, east and west,which are also within the General Industrial(GI)District.Since the existing uses conducted on the adjacent properties are similar to the uses that are permitted to be established within the within the subject development,then:should not be a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project.There are sensitive receptors within the project vicinity, which are located to the northwest across Acacia Street as well as southwest across Archibald Avenue and 7n'Street of the subject parcel.The closest area of the site to the existing residential community located at the southwest, across Archibald Avenue and 7"'Street,will contain two buildings that have 9enerally been designed for light industrial/offices uses as a large majority of the floor plan will be dedicated towards office space,with little area for storage and no area for manufacturing,which can typically account for more noise generation. Additional residential homes are located at the northwest comer of the site, across Acacia Street approximately 150 feet west of Cottage Avenue. These homes are surrounded by existing industrial uses to the east and south. The proposed development is not expected to create a substantial increase in permanent noise levels that would affect this site beyond what currently exists within the vicinity. Additionally, as previously noted, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses.As such, no impacts are anticipated.Also, the measures listed in 12.a will mitigate the short-term noise impacts to a level of less than significant. d) The General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.12)indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however,if noise levels exceed the above standards,then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G113 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 31 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Im act Im ad activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is located within an airport land use plan and is approximately 2 miles of a public airport. The project is located approximately 2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest.private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. • 13. POPULATION O AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( } ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ). ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand-for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No significant impacts are anticipated. b) The project involves the construction of a multitenant industrial development and therefore contains no existing housing units. There are a total of 6 buildings (of various size and purpose) as well as parking, landscape and employee break areas. The existing site conditions contain no structure, including housing units. No adverse impact expected. • c) The project involves the construction of a multitenant industrial development and therefore contains no existing housing units. There are a total of 6 buildings (of various size and Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G114 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 32 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: P°`entiant With Than pp g Significant With Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact --Impact purpose) as well as parking, landscape and employee break areas. The existing site conditions contain no structures. No adverse impact expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services. a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) C) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The site, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street, would be served by Fire Station #2 located at 9612 San Bernardino Road about 1.26 miles to the north of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. C) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are Anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is Old Town Park at 10033 Feron Boulevard located about 1,000 feet to the northeast of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service,which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G115 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 33 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Im act Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) parks or other recreational facilities. such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park Old Town Park at 10033 Feron Boulevard located about 1,000 feet to the northeast of the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational • facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a)response above. 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? • Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G116 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 34 Less Than Significant Less PicY with ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant N56gaficn Sigrrificant No Impact incorporated impact Impact d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle,or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the. performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 1,533 vehicle trips daily. The proposed project includes the development of six(6)industrial warehouse buildings totaling approximately 173,000 square feet in building area on a 12.23-acre site located at the northeast comer of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. A Traffic Impact Analysis(TIA)was prepared by RK Engineering Group,Inc.on June 24,2014. Intersections were analyzed where the project contributed 50 or more peak hour trips. With the exception of 2 intersections,the TIA proved that the project does not significantly impact intersections in comparison to conditions without the project. The 2 intersections impacted by the project are Archibald Avenue at 7th Street and Archibald Avenue at Acacia Street Traffic signal improvements at Archibald Avenue and 7th Street would mitigate the impact and bring the intersection to an acceptable level of service. Since the traffic study indicates that a traffic signal at Archibald Avenue and 7t'Street is warranted based upon existing conditions, RK Engineering Group Inc. recommends that the applicant participate in funding the traffic signal at Archibald Avenue and 7t' Street, which will be added as a condition of approval. Traffic signal improvements at Archibald Avenue at Acacia Street would not be feasible due to the proximity of nearby proposed and existing traffic signals. However, the addition of the nearby traffic signal at Archibald Avenue and 7th Street would provide an alternative for a signalized intersection rather than unsignalized movements at Archibald and Acacia. The project site will be required to provide street improvements(curb,gutter and sidewalk)along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. Less than significant impacts are anticipated with the recommended conditions discussed above. b) The TIA estimates that the proposed project will generate 201 two-way AM peak hour trips and 214 two-way PM peak hour trips. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G117 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 35 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Su Information Sources: Potentially with Than PPortin g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact all street improvements existing. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb,gutter,and sidewalk)along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. C) Located about 2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk)along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The design of the project includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bicycle racks, etc.). No impacts are anticipated. • 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources,or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • regulations related to solid waste? Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G118 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 36 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PoWith Than pp g Signnificantificant Mltigatlan Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact. Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will'be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G119 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565 Page 37 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PoteSignificant anWith Than antt With Significant No Impact Incorporated Ing act Im act 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: • a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. The project site is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street. The site is characterized by industrial development to the north, east, south, and west. At the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 7t'Street is a single-family residential community and at the northwest corner of the site, where the subject parcel abuts Acacia Street, is a group of single-family residential homes.The subject property is currently vacant and does not contain vegetation or visible wildlife.According to the General Plan Figure RC-4,and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR,the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources;therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals. Based on the site's current condition, and existing surrounding development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. No impacts are anticipated. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics,Agriculture and Forest Resources,Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). • These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G120 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Design Review DRC2013-00565 Page 38 findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations,no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) Development of the site as a multi-building industrial complex would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR,or other CEQA process,one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s)pursuant to applicable legal standards,and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department office at 10500 Civic Center Drive: (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FOR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (T) Air Quality Impact Analysis (LSA Associates Inc., October 2013) (T) Traffic Impact Study (RK Engineering Group, Inc., June 24, 2014) (T) Water Quality Management Plan (San Guerra and Associates, September 4, 2013) Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G121 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Design Review DRC2013-00565 Page 39 • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearlyno significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant s Signature: � Date: Print Name and Title: (far' Vown.P-r �AC) ,4 nct�c1ni�"e�-' • Rev 2-26-13 Item E-G122 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2013-00565 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval,for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management-The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is.taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: ` City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Item E-G123 Mitigation Monitoring Program Design Review DRC2013-00565 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures.The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director, prior to the issuance of building permits. Item E-G124 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART 111) Project File No.: Design Review DRC2013-00565 Applicant: Scheu Management Corporation Initial Study Prepared by: Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner Date: August 14, 2014 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Moni torin Fre 1 c Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance ecfi. n A Frequency y ~r ... ,. ...5c... .�.%.i 4...i,.....1. ...... .... .t..,....... ...._..ai.i.. +:.._ ,. r _pv7'a ._. ,.......�.....,........:.e.t........r. .♦�•.s..53.....e..[..:f t,.:..a.......F.....,_ai..l..,..�.h..t..-......._.f,:. :.( .: T.. < I Short Term (Construction)Emissions ttfiit.�.'.•.+:t'.. R Y:'�... ``r 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. m2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance 'standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance BO B Review of plans A/C 2 standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, Page 1 of 12 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 roads. Phase grading to prevent the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans q 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering ractices. Sweep streets according to a schedule BO C During construction A . 4 established by the City if silt is carried M over to adjacent public thoroughfares or n occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may N vary depending upon the time of year of CO construction. • Suspend grading operations during high BO C During construction q 4 winds (i.e:, wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard BO C During Construction q 4 ratio on soils haul trucks or cover: payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB)) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PMio) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all Page 2 of 12 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric Bp C Review of plans A/C 4 or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Long Term Emissions 1) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 2) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 3) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. m r4) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time -4 clocks or occupant sensors. 5) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 6) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 7) All industrial and commercial facilities shall BO C Review of plans A 4 post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 8) All industrial and commercial facilities shall PD C Review of plans A/C 2/3 designate preferential parking for vanpools. 9) All industrial and commercial site tenants with PD C Review of plans D 2/3 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. Page 3 of 12 i I Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 10) All industrial and commercial site tenants with PD C Review of plans D 2/3 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. �+ li ^ Q au ee 197, r 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 ae require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal i point. Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with P/D B/C Review of A/D Section 21083.2 Archeological resources Plans/Report During of CEQA to eliminate adverse project Construction effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project Page 4 of 12 • • • Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Com liance area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or PD B Review of report A/D 4 animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: m Assign a paleontological monitor, trained PD B Review of report A/D 4 and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay; to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area BO B/C Review of report AID 4 being cleared or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all PD D Review of report D 3 recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho PD D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to Page 5 of 12 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance San Bernardino Count Museum. 7' 0!, tiyav':A 1 The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re- planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept BO C During construction A 4 according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMio emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when BO C During construction A 4 wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMio emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. V 5 :Y t p Short Term(Construction) GHG Emissions 1 The project must comply with all rules that BO C During construction A 4 assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contactor shall select BO C During construction A 4 construction equipment based on low- emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. Page 6 of 12 • • • Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more BO C During construction A 4 than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be BO C During construction A 4 utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to BO C During construction A 4 interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be BO C During construction A 4 supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 1) Construction and Building materials shall be BO A During Construction C 2 produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound 3 (VOC) materials. m � 2) Design all buildings to exceed California BO A During Construction C 2 Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes(LED's) for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation Page 7 of 12 Mitigation Measures No.l Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. F" • Design irrigation to control runoff and to m remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and CE A Review of plans C 2 N demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. ydr Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits,the permit BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 214 applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion Page 8 of 12 • • • Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 9, 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, BO B/C/DReview of plans A/C 2/4 street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to �Y control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Dan Guerra and Associates on September 4, 2013 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical, 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading Activities Page 9 of 12 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementin Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs) that will be used:on-site to reduce pollutants-into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources 3 Control Board. Evidence that this has been rn obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste 6 Discharger's Identification Number) shall be A submitted to the City Building Official .for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. agf .. .......r..... .s_..:.........r...:...s.i ..,.. .. .... ,.. .:y, etx' ..}S.' _ i 'irF�s.: ts%.'�ti' 1S•tk -' ` SeC-pfl§. ,F' .,pfd. .Y„,Fi:t�.:,,F.G �k5v., •:r..ya ��;e,,dz �J�._ '1z' .,xy,t„ s,y' - ,s.• rS, .�.�;.r .a Kz e• Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 PM until 7 AM. No loading and unloading activities including opening,closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials; garbage cans,or other similar objects between the hours of 10 PM and 7 AM in a manner Page 10 of 12 • • • Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. Interior 1) Construction or grading shall not take place BO C During construction A 4 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not BO C During construction A 4 exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the rr Building Official within 24 hours; however, if m noise levels exceed the above standards, then m the consultant shall immediately notify the �j Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities CM shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place PO/BO C During construction A 4/7 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Page 11 of 12 . _�..Responsibly Person A2nito0n8. ..�. ue��y. CDD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD-Planning Director or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO-Building Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds FC-Fire Chief or designee 6-Revoke CUP 7-Citation rF [D 3 M G) w Cn Page 12 of 12 i _ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Development Review DRC2013-00565 Public Review Period Closes: September 24, 2014 Project Name: Project Applicant: Scheu Management Company Project Location (also see attached map): Located within the General Industrial (GI) District at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street -APN: 0209-211-24. Project Description-A request to develop a 6-building industrial complex totaling 173,340 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land. Related cases: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909)477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. September 24, 2014 Date of Determination Adopted By Item E-G137 RESOLUTION NO. 14-39 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 13.23-ACRE PARCEL TO CREATE 3 NEW PARCELS WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 7TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0209-211-24. A. Recitals. 1. Scheu Management Corporation filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly notice public hearing on the application and concluded said public hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning • Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 24, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 13.23-acre vacant undeveloped parcel located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street; and b. The abutting properties to the north and east of the subject site contain industrial buildings and are located within the General Industrial (GI) District; the properties to the south, across from 7th Street, consists of multi-tenant industrial and office buildings that are located within the General Industrial (GI) District; the properties to the west, across Archibald Avenue, contain multi-tenant industrial and office buildings and are located within the General Industrial (GI) District; and c. The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject 13.23-acre parcel into three parcels, creating a 2.13-acre parcel (Parcel 1), a 4.82-acre parcel (Parcel 2) and a 5.89-acre parcel (Parcel 3). Parcel 1, which is adjacent to Archibald Avenue and 7th Street, is approximately 530 feet wide by 175 feet long. Parcel 2, which is south of and abutting Acacia Street and Cottage Avenue, is approximately 450 feet wide by 615 feet long. Parcel 3, which is adjacent to ® the existing rail spur along the eastern perimeter of the site, is approximately 400 feet wide by 615 feet long; and Item E-G138 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-39 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 2 d. The proposed subdivision is being requested in conjunction with the development of six (6) industrial buildings totaling 171,941 square feet: 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed tentative parcel map is in conjunction with a proposal to construct, in two (2) phases, six (6) industrial warehouse buildings of 81,910 square feet (Building 6/Phase 1) and 90,031 square feet(Buildings 1 through 5/Phase 2)with a combined floor area of 171,941 square feet. The underlying General Plan designation is General Industrial; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code because the lots being created meet the minimum parcel dimensions and size requirements; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed as the subject property is currently vacant and does not have any geographical constraints. The property generally slopes from north to south and is surrounded by existing industrial and office development to the north, south, east, and west; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The design of the site is in compliance with the General Plan and-Development Code requirements and is consistent with neighboring existing industrial developments; and e. The tentative parcel map.is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The initial study that was prepared for this project, which includes, but is not limited to an analysis of air quality, water quality, agricultural resources, biological resources and transportation/traffic indicates that the proposed development will not create significant impacts that might cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The project involves the completion of adjacent right-of-way(7th Street and Acacia Avenue)that will be used for vehicular access to the site. These off-site improvements as well as all on-site improvements are consistent with the surrounding development. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA°) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an initial Study of the. potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the Item E-G139 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-39 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450— SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 3 ® project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of one (1) existing parcel into three (3) new parcels in conjunction with the development of a 6-building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area located on a 13.23-acre parcel within the General Industrial (GI) District at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street - APN: 0209-211-24. 2) The project is approved to be developed in two (2) phases. The first phase involves the development of parcel 3 which includes the completion of Building 6 (81,910 square feet), the remaining 7th Street improvements and adjacent landscape planter, and remaining Acacia Street improvements. The second phase involves the development of all remaining improvements including Buildings 1 through 5 (90,031 square feet combined) 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections • of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. Item E-G140 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-39 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 4 4) Easements for the purpose of shared access, use, and maintenance of the parking lot areas, driveways, and drive aisles shall be provided. Documents for these easements shall be submitted for review by the City and the easement recorded with the County of San Bernardino (and other agencieslentities as may be required) prior to the issuance of Grading and Building Permits. 5) All Conditions of Approval for Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250 shall apply. Engineering Services Department 1) Prior to Building Permit issuance, dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 33feet from center line of 7th Street. Additional dedication of 6feet is required. 2) Prior to building permit issuance, dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 33 feet from center line of Acacia Street. Additional dedication of 8.33 feet is required. 3) Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 4) An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. 5) Install public improvements on Archibald Avenue per City "Major Arterial' standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, including but not limited to the following: a) Protect or replace curb, gutter, street trees, sidewalk, and drive approaches as required. b) Protect or replace existing traffic signing and striping as required. c) Install one (1) 9500 Lumen HPSV street light 6) Install public improvements on 7th Street per City "Collector" standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer including but not limited to, the following: a) Provide curb, gutter, street trees, and sidewalk as required. b) Provide traffic signing and striping as.required. c) Install four (4) 9500 Lumen HPSV street lights. d) The driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. Item E-G141 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-39 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 5 7) Install public improvements on Acacia Street per City "Local" standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer including, but not limited to, the following: Provide curb, gutter, street trees, and sidewalk as required. a) Provide traffic signing and striping as required. b) Install one (1) 5800 Lumen HPSV street light. c) Standard knuckle shall be in accordance with City Standard Plan 110. 8) Install drive approaches per City Standard 101 and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9) Street improvement plans, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Alternatively, you may also revise the following public improvement plans to the satisfaction of the CE. Dwg#907, Dwg# 1100: 10) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on Archibald Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The fee shall equal the ® length times the unit amount as established by the City Council based on information supplied by the utility companies and as updated periodically as deemed necessary. 11) .Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to the issuance of a City Building Permit. 12) Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way,fees shall be paid and a Construction Permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. 13) A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 14) Development Impact Fees due at Building Permit issuance. (fees subject to change) Drainage: $19,382 per net acre Transportation: (where applicable) • $ 2,792 per 1,000 sq. ft. (industrial park) Item E-G142 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-39 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450— SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 6 $ 2,327 per 1,000 sq. ft. (warehouse) $ 5,585 per 1,000 sq. ft. (office/business park) 15) Per the traffic impact study prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. on June 24, 2014, the applicant shall participate in funding a traffic signal at the intersection of Archibald Avenue at 7th Street on a fair share basis. Based on the added a.m. traffic that the project will generate at this intersection, a fair share contribution of 7.7 percent of$350,000 shall be required. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume; low-pressures 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Item E-G143 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-39 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450— SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 7 • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • .Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. • 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Long Term Emissions 10) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 12) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting • programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. Item E-G144 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-39 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 8 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 17) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 19) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a.park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide Item E-G145 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-39 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450— SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 9 ® specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. . Geology and Soils • 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1} The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas •. as quickly as possible. Item E-G146 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-39 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 10 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be.tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic- compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade; prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Item E-G147 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-39 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 11 • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a)Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b)An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Dan Guerra and Associates on September 4, 2013 to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Item E-G148 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-39 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 12 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Dan Guerra and Associates on September 2013 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading Activities 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant.Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar . objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. Item E-G149 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-39 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450 — SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 13 • Interior 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the ® extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ray Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: • Item E-G150 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-39 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450 —SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 14 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item E-G151 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBTPM19450 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 7TH STREET-APN: 0209-211-24. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 19450 is granted subject to the approval of the Planning —/—/— Commission. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14-39 Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Mitigated Negative Declaration -$2,206.25 • 1 Item E-G152 Project No. SUBTPM19540 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department and the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. D. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures.. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). E. Building and Safety Industrial and Commercial Standard Conditions —/—/— 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: �— a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and 2 Item E-G153 Project No. SUBTPM19540 Completion Date g. Planning Department Project Number (SUBTPM19450) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Services Department. 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Services Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (SUBTPM19450). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for.a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are • not limited to: Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Prior to issuance of permit issuance for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, and Transportation Development Fee. 4. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. 5. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 6. For projects using septic tank facilities, shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 7. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. • 3 - Item E-G154 Project No. SU.BTPM19540 Completion Date 8. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department public —/—/— counter). 9. All commercial/public/multi-family development swimming pool plans shall be submitted to �— the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for review and approval prior to approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 10. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: a. Provide a reduced Site Plan (8 1/2-inches by 11 inches), which indicates the non- buildable easement. b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement;"which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s). New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances —/—/— considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. �- 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind" instructions. —/—/ 4. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Provide draft stops in attic areas in accordance with CBC Section 1505. —/—/- 6. Roofing materials shall. be Class"A." —/—/- 7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC . —/- 8. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. �— 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be in accordance with /—/— the CBC. 10. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC. —/— 11. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. F. Grading Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit 1. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge —/—/— Identification Number(WDID). 2. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services —/—/— Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 3. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (7th Street) must drain under the —!—/ sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 4 Item E-G155 Project No. SUBTPM19540 Completion Date Prior to issuance of a Wall Permit 4. On engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the • structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off- site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 5. A copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 33' total feet on 7th Street 33'total feet on Acacia Street 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 3. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. 4. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 5. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. H. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.)shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety • lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and 5 Item E-G156 Project No. SUBTPM19540 Completion Date the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed.on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: —/— 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be —/—/— installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger,.shall be installed per City Standards in —/—/— accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet —(typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Min.Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Fill 7th Street Plantanus Acerifolia London Plane Tree 8' 30' 15 gal. in Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting,an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the 6 Item E-G157 Project No. SUBTPM19540 Completion Date public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. • 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with —/—/— adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. I. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting —/—� Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. J. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering —/—/— the property from adjacent areas. K. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, —/—/— gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV(all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. —/—/- 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the is Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. L. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for —/—/— all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees —/—/— shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD- 1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes,the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at www.cityofrc.us. •M. Industrial Fire Standard Conditions 7 Item E-G158 Project No. SUBTPM19540 Completion Date FSC -1 Public and Private Water Supply Design Guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10. —/—/— FSC -2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual —/—/— pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed.. 2. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing —/—/— water supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until the fire protection water supply plans are approved. 4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of —/—/— the proposed project site. FSC-3 Pre-requisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit —/—�— plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the —/—/— California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System &Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The current edition of California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm —/—/— Standard 9-3 require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standards. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard 5-1. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1 st story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: —/—/— a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. 8 Item E-G159 Project No. SUBTPM19540 Completion Date b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. C. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet. • d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or.20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall.not exceed 12 percent. i. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6. inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: "Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be —/—/— provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the current edition of California Building/Fire Codes and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus —/—/— • access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with —/—/— RCFPD Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall —/—/— be in accordance with Fire District Standards. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. C. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. 9 Item E-G160 Project No. SUBTPM19540 Completion Date i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan �— illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted —/—/— on the Site Plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for plan review. 9. Roof Access: must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard. There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures more than 10,000 square feet or with roof more than 15 feet in height and less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road.. a. This access must be reachable by the Fire Department aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed Ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. C. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix. h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits --- Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit;field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below,which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. Aerosol Products Magnesium Working Application of Flammable Finishes Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation 10 Item E-G161 Project No. SUBTPM19540 Completion Date • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Open Burning ® Battery Systems • Organic Coating • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Ovens • Cellulose Nitrate • Powder Coating • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Pyrotechnical Special Effects • Dry Cleaning Plants • Radioactive Materials • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Rubbish Handling Operations • Fruit Ripening Plants • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) • Tire Storage • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • Welding and Cutting Operations • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings • Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials–Submittal to the County of San Bemardino —/—/— The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA)for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety —/—/— Services Department will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City.from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. ® 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a plan is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business 11 Item E-G162 Project No. SUBTPM1954.0 Completion Date is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials-Submittal to Fire Construction Services —/—/- 1. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the current editions of the California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application - Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will --- review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District"Application for Alternate Method"form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation --- 1. Reciprocal Agreements for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorder's Office. 2. Reciprocal Access Agreement–Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. 3. Reciprocal Water Covenant – Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. I 1 FCS-15 Annexation of the Parcel Map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community --- Facilities District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of Grading or Building Permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS – Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site(private)fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. 12 Item E-G163 Project No. SUBTPM19540 Completion Date All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. ® 2. Public Water Supply(Domestic/Fire)Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the —/—/— locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed,flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet, 6 inches above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible —/—/— for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures." ® PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating —/—/— the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in �— the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler �— system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler —/—/— monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). • 13 Item E-G164 Project No. SUBTPM19540 Completion Date 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, �— tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected,tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the — issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire — Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho '— Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 '/Z' x 11" or 11" x 1T' Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant.to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 14 Item E-G165 RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A 6-BUILDING INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX TOTALING 171,941 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING AREA ON 13.23 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 7TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0209-211-24. A. Recitals. 1. Scheu Management Corporation filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2013-00565, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning ® Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on September 24, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 13.23-acre vacant undeveloped parcel located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street; and b. The abutting properties to the north and east of the subject site contain industrial buildings and are located within the General Industrial (GI) District; the properties to the south, across from 7th Street, consists of multi-tenant industrial and office buildings that are located within the General Industrial (GI) District; and the properties to the west, across Archibald Avenue, contain multi-tenant industrial and office buildings and are located within the General Industrial (GI) District; and C. The applicant proposes to develop a 6-building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area. This project is being requested in conjunction with an application to subdivide the subject parcel into 3 separate parcels. Building 1 (15,775 square feet) and building 2 (13,415 square feet), which are located on Parcel 1, are designed to cater towards businesses looking to occupy buildings that contain a large portion of office with minimal storage area. Building 3 (19,950 square feet), Building 4 (20,500 square feet) and Building 5 (20,391 square feet), which are located on Parcel 2, are designed to cater towards businesses Item E-G166 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 2 looking to occupy buildings that contain a primarily open warehouse and storage area with up to 40 percent office area. Building 6 (81,910 square feet), which is located on Parcel 3, is designed with the intent to accommodate one large industrial user, as 76,775 square feet of this building is comprised of a single, open warehouse and distribution area. The remaining 5,135 square feet of the building will be used for office area; and d. The uses and square footage proposed for this project require a total of 335 parking spaces. The development, when completed, will contain a total of 452 provided parking spaces. Therefore, the project will be in compliance with the parking regulations set forth in the Development Code; and e. The buildings will be comprised of concrete tilt-up walls, portions of which will incorporate decorative sandblasted wall planes as well as vertical and horizontal 2-inch wide reveals that span the length of all elevations. The building will also include clear anodized aluminum mullions that surround the storefront glass windows and doors, all of which are. recessed into the front building elevation. Each building, with the exception of Buildings 1 and 2, will have metal roll-up doors that will provide access into the warehouse area of each unit; and f. This project is proposed to be constructed in two phases. The first phase will involve the installation of all improvements shown within Parcel 3, the landscape strip adjacent to the 7th Street frontage, and the landscape strip, drive aisle, and drive approach adjacent to the site's northern property line. Phase two will involve the construction of all remaining improvements, including Buildings 1 through 5, as well as remaining parking and landscaped areas. The development, when completed, will also contain a total of 27 percent overall landscape coverage, decorative paving at each drive entrance and three employee break areas, all of which meet the requirements and intent of the Development Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The applicant proposes a 6-building industrial complex on an existing 13.23- acre vacant parcel. The underlying General Plan designation is General Industrial and the site is located within the General Industrial (GI) Zoning District, which allows for the proposed development; and b. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposal is to construct, in two (2) phases, six (6) industrial office and warehouse buildings totaling 171,941 square feet. Phase 1 .will contain an 81,910 square foot building and phase 2 will contain five (5) buildings with a combined total of 90,031 square feet. The required parking and other applicable development standards will comply with the Development Code; and c. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the Item E-G167 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 3 • community. The subject property as well as the properties to the north, south, east, and west are zoned General Industrial (GI) District. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received'regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction of a 6-building industrial complex • totaling 171,941 square feet of building area located on a 13.23-acre parcel within the General Industrial (GI) District at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street-APN: 0209-211-24. Item E-G168 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 4 2) The project is approved to be developed in two (2) phases. The first phase involves the development of parcel 3 which includes the completion of Building 6 (81,910 square feet), the remaining 7th Street improvements and adjacent landscape planter, and remaining Acacia Street improvements. The second phase involves the development of all remaining improvements including Buildings 1 through 5 (90,031 square feet combined) 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 4) Easements for the purpose of shared access, use, and maintenance of the parking lot areas, driveways, and drive aisles shall be provided. Documents for these easements shall be submitted for review by the City and the easement recorded with the County of San Bernardino (and other agencies/entities as may be required) prior to the issuance of Grading and Building Permits. 5) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 6) The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. The maximum height of light standards, including the base, measured from the finished surface is 25 feet. 7) New walls, including retaining walls, shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the buildings. 8) All materials, supplies, equipment, and operating trucks shall be stored within an enclosed building or area screened from public view. 9) All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or a similarly dark color. 10) At all vehicle entrances along 7th Street and Acacia Street decorative paving shall be provided behind the public right-of-way. The final design of the enhanced pavement including, but not limited to, concrete color and geometric dimensions, shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval. 11) All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices, etc. shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. Item E-G169 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 5 12) All Double Detector Checks(DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be screened in compliance with Section 17.48.050 of the Development Code. 13) All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 14) The employee lunch areas shall have overhead trellises with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. 15) The outdoor furniture shall be provided in the outdoor employee eating areas. All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc.) shall be permanent, uniform, and of durable materials. 16) All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials,finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. 17) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250 shall apply. • Engineering Services Department 1) Prior to Building Permit issuance, dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 33 feet from center line of 7th Street. Additional dedication of 6 feet is required. 2) Prior to Building Permit issuance, dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 33 feet from center line of Acacia Street. Additional dedication of 8.33 feet is required. 3) The comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 4) An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 5) Install public improvements on Archibald Avenue per City "Major Arterial' standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, including but not limited to the following: a) Protect or replace curb, gutter, street trees, sidewalk, and drive approaches as required. • b) Protect or replace existing traffic signing and striping as required. Item E-G 170 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 6 c) Install one (1) 9500 Lumen HPSV street light. 6) Install public improvements on 7th Street per City "Collector" standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer including, but not limited to, the following: a) Provide curb, gutter, street trees, and sidewalk as required. b) Provide traffic signing and striping as required. c) Install four(4) 9500 Lumen HPSV street lights. d) The driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. 7) Install public improvements on Acacia Street per City "Local' standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer including, but not limited to, the following: a) Provide curb, gutter, street trees.and sidewalk as required. b) Provide traffic signing and striping as required. c) Install one (1) 5800 Lumen HPSV street light. d) Standard knuckle shall be in accordance with City Standard Plan 110. 8) Install drive approaches per City Standard 101 and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9) Street improvement plans, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Alternatively, you may also revise the following public improvement plans to the satisfaction of the CE. Dwg#907, Dwg# 1100. 10) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on Archibald Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The fee shall equal the length times the unit amount as established by the City Council based on information supplied by the utility companies and as updated periodically as deemed necessary. 11) Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to the issuance of a City Building Permit. Item E-G171 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565— SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 7 • 12) Prior to any work being performed in the public.right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a Construction Permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. 13) A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 14) Development Impact Fees due at Building Permit issuance. (fees subject to change). Drainage: $19,382 per net acre Transportation: (where applicable) $ 2,792 per 1,000 sq. ft. (industrial park) $ 2,327 per 1,000 sq. ft. (warehouse) $ 5,585 per 1,000 sq. ft. (office/business park) 15) Per the traffic impact study prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. on June 24, 2014, the applicant shall participate in funding a traffic signal at the intersection of Archibald Avenue at 7th Street on a fair share basis. Based on the added a.m. traffic that the project will generate at this intersection, a fair share contribution of 7.7 percent of$350,000 shall be required. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. Item E-G172 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 8 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. 0 Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Long Term Emissions 10) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. Item E-G173 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565— SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 9 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 12) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 17) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. • 19) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 • Archeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources Item E-G174 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 10 including, but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original 'illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered .before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. Item E-G175 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 11 • 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. • 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic- . compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems Item E-G176 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 12 • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about. recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a)Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b)An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. Item E-G177 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 13 • 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Dan Guerra and Associates on September 4, 2013 to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Dan Guerra and Associates on September 2013 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading Activities 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. • Item E-G178 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 14 Noise Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. Interior 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 1) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Item E-G179 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00565—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 15 BY: Ray Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item E-G180 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2013-00565 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW APPLICANT: SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 7TH STREET-APN: 0209-211-24 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements com0edon Date • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Design Review DRC2013-00565 is granted subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14-40, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Mitigated Negative Declaration-$ 2,206.25 B. Time Limits 1 Item E-G 181 Project No. DRC2013-00565 Completion Date 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not —/—/— commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which —�— include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department and the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all —�— Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for �— consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development —/_ Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. D. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of �— implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, .(909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). E. Building and Safety Industrial and Commercial Standard Conditions —/—/— 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: �— a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of.the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (DRC2013-00565)clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Item E-G182 Project No. DRC2013-00565 Completion Date 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. • 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Services Department. 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Services Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number(DRC2013-00565). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Prior to issuance of permit issuance for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, and Transportation Development Fee. 4. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. 5. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 6. For projects using septic tank facilities, shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 7. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 8. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department public counter). — • 3 Item E-G183 Project No. DRC2013-00565 Completion Date 9. All commercial/public/multi-family development swimming pool plans shall be submitted to —/_/— the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for review and approval prior to approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 10. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: _/—/— a. Provide a reduced Site Plan (8 1/2-inches by 11 inches), which indicates the non- buildable easement. b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement,"which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s).. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind" instructions. —/—/- 4. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino —/—/— Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Provide draft stops in attic areas in accordance with CBC Section 1505. —/—/- 6. Roofing materials shall be Class"A." —/—/- 7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC 8. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC- 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be in accordance with the CBC. 10. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC. —/—/— 11. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. —/—/ F. Grading Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit 1. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 2. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 3. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (7t" Street) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Services Department. 4 Item E-G184 Project No. DRC2013-00565 Completion Date Prior to issuance of a Wall Permit ® 4. On engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the 9 9 9 9 P Y structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off- site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 5. A copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made,of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 33' total feet on 7th Street 33' total feet on Acacia Street 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 3. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. • 4. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 5. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. H. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: 5 Item E-G185 Project No. DRC2013-00565 Completion Date a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety —/—/— lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a —/—/— construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, �— and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or /— reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed.on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: —/—/- 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be —/—/— installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet —(typically Sheet 1). Where public landscape plans are required,tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Min.Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Fill 7th St Plantanus Acerifolia London Plane Tree 8' 30' 15 gal. in Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 6 Item E-G186 Project No. DRC2013-00565 Completion Date 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. • 6. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All /— improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with —/—/— adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. I. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting —/—/— Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. J. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering —/—/— the property from adjacent areas. K. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, —/—/— gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV(all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. • 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. —/—/- 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the —/—/— Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. L. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for —/—/— all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees —/—/— shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD- 1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. • 7 Item E-G187 Project No. DRC2013-00565 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909)477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at www.citvofrc.us. M. Industrial Fire Standard Conditions FSC -1 Public and Private Water Supply Design Guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10. —/—/— FSC -2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual —/—/— pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 2. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used —/—/— to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and. approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until the fire protection water supply plans are approved. 4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of —/—/— the proposed project site. FSC-3 Pre-requisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit —/—/— plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the —/—/— California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System &Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The current edition of California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm —/—/— Standard 9-3 require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standards. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard 5-1. 8 Item E-G188 Project No. DRC2013-00565 Completion Date 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1 st story exterior wall shall be located within �- 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are • deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: —/—/— a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. C. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. i. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: "Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be —/—/— provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the ® current edition of California Building/Fire Codes and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus —/—/— access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with RCFPD Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall —/—/— be in accordance with Fire District Standards. The following design requirements apply.- a. pply:a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. C. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at ® the Fire Administration Office. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. 9 Item E-G189 Project No. DRC2013-00565 Completion Date g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan —/—/— illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted —/—/— on the Site Plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for plan review. 9. Roof Access: must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard. There shall �— be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures more than 10,000 square feet or with roof more than 15 feet in height and less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by the Fire Department aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. C. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix. h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit;field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below,which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. 10 Item E-G190 Project No. DRC2013-00565 Completion Date • Aerosol Products • Magnesium Working • • Application of Flammable Finishes • Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Open Burning • Battery Systems • Organic Coating • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Ovens • Cellulose Nitrate • Powder Coating • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Pyrotechnical Special Effects • Dry Cleaning Plants • Radioactive Materials • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Repair Garages • • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Rubbish Handling Operations • Fruit Ripening Plants • Spraying or Dipping Operations • . Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) • Tire Storage • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • Welding and Cutting Operations • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings • Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials–Submittal to the County of San Bernardino —/—/— The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at(909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency(COPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety —/—/— Services Department will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section • 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk 11 Item E-G191 Project No. DRC2013-00565 Completion Date Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a plan is �— also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials-Subm.ittal to Fire Construction Services �- 1. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the current editions of the California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application - Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will ——— review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the. Fire District"Application for Alternate Method"form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation —— 1. Reciprocal Agreements for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorder's Office. 2. Reciprocal Access Agreement-Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. 3. Reciprocal Water Covenant - Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the Parcel Map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community —'-- Facilities District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of Grading or Building Permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS - Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District 12 Item E-G192 Project No. DRC2013-00565 Completion Date Standards. Approval of the on-site(private)fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply(Domestic/Fire)Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the —/—/— locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. . Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet, 6 inches above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded /—/— with the County of San Bernardino. • PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures." PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION - Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating —/—/— the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in —/—/— the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler —/—/— system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,the fire sprinkler /— monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire 13 Item E-G193 Project No. DRC2013-00565 Completion Date sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance.of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system --- shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy,the fire access --- roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the_Rancho —' Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 '/1" x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 14 Item E-G194 RESOLUTION NO. 14-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2014-00250, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF A 6-BUILDING INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX TOTALING 171,941 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING AREA ON 13.23 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(GI)DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 7TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0209-211-24. A. Recitals. 1. Scheu Management Corporation filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2014-00250, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September 2014,the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on September 24, 2014, including written and oral staff reports,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 13.23-acre vacant undeveloped parcel located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street; and b. The abutting properties to the north and east of the subject site contain industrial buildings and are located within the General Industrial(GI) District;the properties to the south, across from 7th Street, consists of multi-tenant industrial and office buildings that are located within the General Industrial (GI) District; and the properties to the west, across Archibald Avenue, contain multi-tenant industrial and office buildings and are located within the General Industrial (GI) District; and C. The applicant proposes to establish a Uniform Sign Program (USP) for a proposed development of a 6-building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area. This project is being requested in conjunction with an application to subdivide the subject parcel into 3 separate parcels; and d. The Development Code, Section 17.74, requires that a Uniform Sign Program be established for all new multi-tenant shopping centers, office parks, and other multi-tenant, mixed-use, or otherwise integrated developments of three (3) or more separate tenants/uses that share buildings, public spaces, landscape, and/or parking facilities. The proposed USP contains provisions that regulate permanent building signage for each individual tenant as well as permanent monument signage for property identification. The USP allows for a maximum of one non-illuminated sign for each tenant occupying Buildings 1 through 5, with the exception of the tenant occupying the space closest to Archibald Avenue in Building 1 • that will be allowed to have a total of two buildings signs. Building 6, which is intended to occupy a single large tenant, will be permitted to have a total of two non-illuminated building signs. The USP indicates that - lemma=GT9,5- VLANNINU UUMMIbblUN KtSULU I IUN NU. 14-41 UNIFORM SIGN PRORAM DRC2014-00250—SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 2 there will be a total of two property identification (monument) signs, one sign to be located at the northeast comer of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street and the other sign to be located at the southeast comer of the site, adjacent to the end of 7th Street; and e. These signs are typical for industrial warehouse buildings; and f. The potential size, location, and placement of the signs will be integrated and compatible with the architecture of the buildings and the site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Uniform Sign Program is consistent with the development standards for signs as provided in Chapter 17.74 (Sign Regulations for Private Property); and b. The design, location, and scale of proposed signs for the integrated development are in keeping with the architectural character of the development. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450 and Development Review DRC2013-00565 —the primary development projects with which this Uniform Sign Program is associated. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality/greenhouse gases, cultural resources, geology/soils, hydrology/water quality, and noise there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination,a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the establishment of a Uniform Sign Program in conjunction with the development of a 6-building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area-APN: 0209-211-24. 2) The applicant shall submit a final draft of the Uniform Sign Program for the City's records prior to issuance of Building Permits. The final draft shall include all applicable technical corrections/revisions as described in the Design Review Committee's action/comments report for the Design Review Committee meeting held on September 17, 2013. All signs shall require review and approval of a separate Sign Permit application by the Planning Director prior to installation. 3) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450 and Development Review DRC2013-00565 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING GUMM1551UN KtSULU I IUN NU. 14-41 UNIFORM SIGN PRORAM DRC2014-00250 —SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION September 24, 2014 Page 3 is APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ray Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ® ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item E-G197 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAN DARD .CON DITIO. N. S PROJECT#: DRC2014-00250 SUBJECT: UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM APPLICANT: SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 7TH STREET-APN: 0209-211-24. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements completion Date • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250 is granted subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14-41, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption -$50 1 --- item —Cl-9$ -- Project No. DRC2014-00250 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the.approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department and the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations. , 2. Prior to any use of the .project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive-compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2 Item E-G199 STAFF R.EPoRT • PIANN NGDEPAFaW E T DATE: September 24, 2014 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission RANCHO FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director CUCAMONGA BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - A request to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) in order to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APN: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09. Related cases: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 and Development Review DRC2014-0000127. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. -A request to modify the Zoning Map to change land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) in order to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and • Buffalo Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District -APN: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09. Related cases: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Development Review DRC2014-0000127. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - Site plan and architectural review of a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District -APN: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related cases: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following actions: • That the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution approving Design Review DRC2014-00127. • That the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolutions recommending the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014- 00126. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: • A. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): 49 percent (below the maximum 60 percent FAR permitted by General Plan Figure LU2 (Land Use Plan) for the General Industrial (GI) Development District). Item H-J1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126,AND DRC2014-00127-COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR CSF, INC. September 24, 2014 Page 2 B. Zoning Mar) Designations North - Existing Light Industrial Development; General Industrial (GI) Development District South - Existing Commercial Development; Industrial Park (IP) Development District East - Existing Industrial Development; Industrial Park (IP) Development District West - Existing Industrial Development; Industrial Park (IP) Development District C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial Park North - General Industrial South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park ANALYSIS: A. Project Proposal: The applicant is requesting site.plan and design review of a 139,983 square foot industrial building on a 6.6-acre site. The site is bordered by Mission Park Drive to the north, Buffalo Avenue to the east and Richmond Place'to the west. The project complies with all Development Code requirements except that the Industrial Park (IP) Development District limits the Wholesale, Storage and Distribution land use category to tenant spaces that occupy 50,000 square feet or less. The building is designed with the potential to be subdivided and includes a main entrance off of both Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue. The truck loading docks are located along the south side of the building and are fully screened from the adjacent streets by 8-foot high block walls. Each wall plane of the building is articulated and includes multiple tower elements with glazing and stone veneer. The roof parapets have been designed to fully screen the rooftop equipment. The project includes three water retention basins that will be landscaped. Total landscape coverage including the retention basins is 17 percent, 7 percent in excess of the minimum requirement. B. General Plan and Zoning Mar) Amendment: Included in the request is a General Plan Amendment to change the zoning designation of the site from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI). The Development Code distinguishes warehouse/storage/distribution tenants who occupy tenant spaces of 50,000 square feet or less as Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution - Light and tenants who occupy over 50,000 square feet as Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution - Medium. The Industrial Park (IP) District only permits Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Light and not Medium. The applicant is requesting to construct a 139,983 square foot building designed for warehouse/storage/distribution tenants over 50,000 square feet. In order to do so, the land use designation must be changed from Industrial Park (IP) District to General Industrial (GI) District, which permits Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Medium. The land uses to the north, east and west are predominately industrial in nature. The existing commercial development to the south acts as a buffer between the commercial uses along 4th Street and the surrounding industrial land uses. The request is accompanied by a Zoning Map Amendment to bring the Zoning Map in line with the General Plan Land Use Map. C. Parking: The project provides 104 parking spaces, 4 parking space in excess of the 100 required parking spaces (see table below). The warehouse also includes 14 dock doors Item H-J2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, AND DRC2014-00127-COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR CSF, INC. • September 24, 2014 Page 3 which require 1 additional trailer parking space per dock door. The project provides 15 trailer spaces, 1 in excess of the minimum requirement. LAND USE PARKING REQUIREMENT REQUIRED PARKING 12,000 SF Office 1/1,000 SF 48 20,000 SF Warehouse 1/1,000 First 20,000 SF 20 20,000 SF Warehouse 1/1,000 Second 20,000 SF 10 88,000 SF Warehouse 1/4,0000 Remaining SF 1 22 Total SF = 40,000 1 Parking Required = 100 D. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) on August 5, 2014. The main issue raised by staff was whether the proposed stone veneer was appropriate for an industrial building. The committee members felt that the stone veneer gave the building a more commercial building appearance, which provided a good transition from the commercial buildings to the south to the industrial buildings to north east and west. The Committee forwarded the project to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of approval. E. SB18 Tribal Consultation: California State Bill 18 requires that the City send project notification to California tribal communities when a project proposes a General Plan amendment. Notification was sent on February 27, 2014. A letter was received on March 3, 2014, from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians stating that they were not concerned about the proposed • General Plan Amendment but wished to stay apprised of the project. Staff forwarded their representative, Joseph Ontiveros, an electronic set of the plans. Staff has not received a return comment to this date. F. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA°) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, air quality, greenhouse gas, geology and soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff has not received any letters or phone calls expressing concern over the Conditional Use Permit. Respectfully submitted, • Can4Bu Planning Director CB:TV/ge Item H-J3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126,AND DRC2014-00127 COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR CSF, INC. September 24, 2014 Page 4 Attachments: Exhibit A - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Design Review Committee Action Agenda for August 5, 2014 _ Exhibit C - Initial Studies I and II Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan DRC2014-00012 Resolution Recommending Approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2014-00127 Item H-J4 !1`;I _ _ _ _-_ I .NL FUTURE ROOF EQUIPMENT CREENFOBVP $1NLL BE 1 9 .TS I'!i t,{illii111;i+F i..�ilii lii+�irI� a� JFK Mission Park Drive rw h IParkina Re wrements: N PLAN VIEW r TNM m d w�i r eS F� ' W r Elev.VIEW TYP BAY O 1 _ . n ste — —17 Trash Encl.Elev. TypIMWNCm �F nM.W Npn a uTrash Encl.Plan .. ManumN Npn RECYQINd TML1 ENCL. ...�, ` Laslbn PER CITYETMNMRO6 ± , K W� . MISSI-ON VISTA DRIVE Z <K w Industrial Building g � / 135,183 SF a (139,983 SF Including Mezzanine) S r =_ / EWFMN.W. .teF.te SF `� N j O PMYYq AFeuIM ❑ I �� g PeNpPmleN tMOE'n,Y.OmW 9,Ip.NP.M1y. Tnwr Pe,,.Fp n•trr.Erc I/ 9 O l LrMNr PM4Me ;a,Fteo' E Oerk�F N z e Re:e •A.TMI SF•tOJF% M,b,NF WtONn^W^ •u.to]eF•,T.t,% W TWF .•dUWN.V MTE 6583 MEET No. SUBMITTAL-01 Al SITE PLAN A ,s`M F ; wwm Fit wN Kaa SOUTH ELEVATION 77=1 E Partial Elevation 1 n L d ±R . x e rr NORTH ELEVATIONCD r�~ IaGEE „-0 ok .A .w, M F I N°fin Gnnle 1 wawa,Hurt — EAST ELEVATION a w I Sw,dMGMa aGlE:,ll°••,'a' I — wNw°Ner 0 V 3 I H«woo.M" Z w U i MM AND COLOR SCHEDULE a < W a7 w j g AAS BBS OOS�— M o w Eeaw ELDIJ w� A. �( =1 H U § w Z — — WEST ELEVATION w,,,o,,,,,,,m,a 'wuw`N ev G,E p CCC Aa No.'• 6563 9NEET MO. SUBMITTAL-01 / A2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A ,,a,G,E� i, 'a j 4� tl( it i -------------- GRAPHIC SCALE Qbi3VEm 6 "oo-Oa64V❑®GJ o-a.Alm C8F Rancho Cucamonga 100-27 '"per •` RANCHO CUCAMONQA, CA '."w`� ,.nrAa C rn c 3 2 00 7y�l6 yp :� ,ryr �� C'1 5t1! M 'S ✓� fin! yak;�1M ' _ at '" rw �rl+aiw��ilii�wawrrstw+xeit+.mea,aarr�ir.ne,34r�at�:a�w.,r;rsrrr.w,f gw19f tXOf �BNosMwt G1IAVHIG 9CAIf. 1• LEOY.OlK1�'V iN Owiw .Yw �w .•n�nfr +nt�� neln C e+i`nr A• ��-aM�i' �T �f COMMlIIC[C01MT11UC77df CO.LP. Rancho CUcamonQa 700"2' ... •:¢« """." -- ---- o INDUSTRIAL SUIL-04M# RANCHO CUCAM4ONc'1A, CA �"i sig � 3 1W pub — =■ —��J I ®' e•.�aw � y i�`� '��`:���Oi a��•>e`�i•'•�P�a�••>-��. '�',;. �� � .���'a a u j I V af� Y 1 _ _ �dV ® • • t ` .................... ....... EXISTING RICHMOND AVENUE EXISTING MISSION PARK DRIVE TYPICAL SECTION io iFi ....................... ........................ SECTION-81 n. SECTION SECTION IK EXISTING BUFFALO AVENUE TYPICAL SECTION ani ...... ;4BOTION'E' SIEC�Tl?!N7 C0690111MCE CONS TION CO.LP. 0<CD GO(3:0 UE Uc:,L*L —gi B' 0O 27 INE::)US I HIIAL— ;�2pia as RANCHO C--tJ4--AM(DNC!I^- (--.A p� N i p U 6 CR `—� OZQ adlz :HIM d 361O 00 Q a0-10 COU (CDI I A LZU 9U Q 1 A t I I � ( ' YEOL f0 ady =_s.........................E3.......................s.................................... sa a _...._--_-..._ -.. �__._- ______�..gea g.___�_.—_..__.._.—..__. _--•_—_ _—___..._.. _—_-__.______ •,.:.......i...........:. .ia .......... ----------- - ------ -------------— ---------------- ------ ------- -+� -- � .�•O I i IT I yfi i Mtt�-+ Ir— •ar-� � ----- — ------------ -_ -e------`---- --e --`-see=- ____`_ ------------ _-_� -___-°__e'~ae- ��~� i•EI � I .................... ....... MINION DMNIgWi [17 70.T ...... It 1 -1 1.-1 ZI I.: IT, IT I- IT I""I r I IT*, Iv i I T-v �ln- N�1, m if TY- -1,47 1 y i T r., x- 14 It 4. 1p I I'm I E -40 . .... .. ..... GR"Hic scA cornice CoNs..ucTloN co,Lit. 100-7 C--SF= Rancho Cucamonga �.a*• C,w;,';�,,, INDUSTRIALINDUSTRIALOUIL-CPIN-ao RANC-RANCHOCUCAMONQA. CA 1.12 'T"Si -3 6TH Si FANK own —---------—---—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—- PROJECTAN i II, .......... �T --....'. ... . .11 . ---- ... - ­_=­ .......... ..... ................ %f11r41_1ry m "DMA I D m A H IIII M'A :5 IT -I. I... til `••,•-=: "" �''�'�-. !},j�• ..��:_„w...7...:7.7..,•.1.:. A ............................................... ............................................... iwm-� A M.-M. ..............�N ?...........In........._fm r.".. ............y-....__i ......... J.-AN ........................................ . .............................. ...........1:............. .......... A • ........................ ................................ .......... ............- ..........LA --------------------------- .......... w wr: PRELIMINARY WCIMP SITE and DRAINAGE PL-AN <--SF= Rancho (-_U4_-48Lmc>nCp& 100-27 INEDUE3-rFzVIAL - E3U1L_1D1NCA FtAN(=:F-fCD (-_Uf_-AMCDNC31A, r--A Pn a Baer an W EXISTING RICHMOND AVENUE i-- -- -SECTIOWAt SECTION'B' EXISTING MISSION PARK DRIVE SECTION*C* TYPICAL SECTION ............... ............ ..... ................. ION"O JSEC'nON"D'4 .- I i f - EXISTING BUFFALO AVENUE I TYPICAL SECTION ID NON-STRUCTURAL AND SC)UFt(--E-= (--C>NTFIC:>L- BMP* n m TYPICAL WLTRATION BASIN NTS wJev,gq a•'0 BMF' MAINTENANCE SCHf=-r->UL.Ea PRELIMINARY WQMP SITE and [DRAINAGE PLAN SF= ReLnc--hc> Cucamonga RAN4--F-i<:> (--UC^MCZ>N(a^, 4:--A 2013 • R..mP pe,,.�px.pt Rw, gyp. TYPICAL INFILTRATION BASIN CATCH BASIN STENCIL TRITONO Catch Basin Inserts TRIMN C-b Iden llir C,h Ene fnsd it—g-I.be—d"hebw the•rtAarb opwruq of corm drm Miea AnaAeefo ride:daNharin lrtFq ���'' IWwm vppliW W muvlawrtr i+. i 5pad:NcaDar,; 3 •ElrbphvfllrtnwylM rs 9avb • m—e Dert AvaWMeTrehnpbpyfor Dn N Aormwwer dea Mzupwned PneinrtDMP). •Npnn.eve 1G9h knDaa PoMpbrmePl.rtic mnemalpn wth D.V. leNtelp2 Drwq Pend d the Pink used mma fmm r ded bM+IleOfsnilrieVilrV •Medi—rmddpes vpJelef prthe. ,l ofhydrporhpnr..1-1 ri r.pd.ra..,d lmer 7 1 • 1*p:.ble Meal:Peklemnrwaed hvm duratr9ederine y� popkM p- 00— eandc \ _ �„•„ •ODl-9-1,TM,pp Vp pyl—yrtem dl.,,ed rp a.1.in rhe ~ r1. ,1 d muh and debnz in m 11,nawdh TMDlSl andard Dimension. - •m,zwuence�berwnpved rMpu9h NearA ppe�ip 1pr ezed Y`?�'1 or - nr] •MMshnpMaumwr PerFM.nd O4lG npndpntr �--`--'�--�—�-' AV SOP IiewYJsrM' .$.mow ... ,... ...R . ...l.m •wne roa 000 ..........._.. Y n a___..__�'�_._. ,mww•n. 'n a 1100 'siwtiia'u'uei'e'..raixix'1 � sw.V'" .....i .__3 �� Pivw dryr,eam law: nc—zs _;,1__....5m......j f E sm .l— ........ .. .._......._ r ..... ym 45 g gyp•' ,1....__........ .._]fro"'_.._!.:_ ` .:... ...,,...r.�Ne vr•.r.r.,�.,..o.,e... faao 1 _-a-i�S� mmeWgl zrnm.. TNcu mnp, ,.....b n..n,...,,r.u..r an...•..,. ......._.._._._iAao ' COMI[gf ei,ee�n.up•;.nn.r.maw,�.e:.:n....wn CATCH BASIN INLET FILTER PRELIMINARY WOMP SITE and C)RAINAGE PLAN _ CSF Rancho Cucamonga 100-27 INI]USTRIAL BUIL1:>ING31 mom... RANCHO CUCAMON01A• CA 3 0l 3 REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE iM'4i�y1 tam emarm PUNT SLNEOIUE Mission F ark bTive-..�.. - .—._�_�._�__� ....................A..,.......,.., w ,.. as Proposed Building � ;� r: � � ..,....,...........a._..,.w..�,..... ... .. Nei. - � :In'Oe4Cm, M,vMOwN, — �. N,w,,n.,_,q„ • �� l ,� 1. a,.. � ( 4 ................. �, .., ,.. l r. NOTES � ................�.�..._.._.>,.��,.,.. ,. ,,,. ,,. „ 1. ALL TREES WRHN S OF l/AROSCAPE MAU BE IN A SHAWTOWN LNEAR(WRAP ARMW NOT ALLOW®) ROOT euaaER24'HIGH LWARROOT BARRIER SWILL BECOMMIONTRIM Awn MIFN SHREDDED MULCH NOTE a BOTH DtRECTK"FOR A TOTAL OF tOALL PLANTER AREAS TO RECENEArr WEROF&IRWIXV COVER Mk CH AVMASLE FROM 2 NOTE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL CONCRETE MO'A'GI1 W TO DEFINE of FOLLOW'NO AREAS: EAR7RAM S(W)TV4M p B BETWEEN QRAVEL AND PLNTNO AREAS. R C 7. NOTE;OUMITRIES AND AREA CALCULATIONS SHOYM N LEOE D ARE FOR R1 ONLY. -'- CdITRACTORREPONSSlLf FOR ALL DT1AtiT17Y TAItE4FF3 AM AREA CALCLLATDHS FOR DETERMNND COST AMI OWITRY OF MIATEMALS TO SM r 1\ NOFTR L-7 REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE PLANT SCHEDULE s Mi Mission ParkDnve - -—-—-—-—- � I BLS � ,wne« ffi la Proposed Building I o E rAis __ ..... ......... .. _......_................ senor S- '_.F._._... {..._.;.__._.. j F '• _ Nw».,w»w H)T,rw Mono .. _ ,:.,.....m,.n w.»,w w r :n 3 1014 M,lr B.0iIn0 Sd1 M,YIBWq _ L V tA mml MEnumm Lxone� VEER GLINSTumMo9 \ Pw'~ Z c.-r.w.,re..wnana. ..-.....n..r n..o.n. :.+ w a..< m' W �. u..._.,.. u .uw. m w ow u.. w o NOTES ® . » ..,».wT..,..r"..w _ :. f o I 1. ALL TREES WITHIN Ir OF HARDSCAPE SHALL BE IN A SHAWTOWN LINEAR(WRAP MOUND NOT ALLOWED) LuJ ROOT BARRIER$/'HIGH LINEAR ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE CENTERED ON TREE AND EXTEND 6 W SHREDDED MULCH NOTE a BOTH DIRECTIONS FOR ATOTAL OF 10' ALL RANTER MEAS TO RECEIVE A S'LAYER OF SHREDDED COVER MULCH AVAILABLE FROM 2 NOTE:CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL CONCRETE MDWCURBS TO DEFINE THE FOLLOWING AREAS: EARTHWORKS 1061)71140780 BETWEEN GRAVEL AND PUWRWG AREAS. 3. NOTE:QUANTITIES AND AREA CALCULATIONS SHOWN IN LEGEND ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. �,:n,w 11FK 7•Ktlrt CONTRACTOR REPONSIBLE FOR ALL QUANTITY TAKE-OFFS AND AREA CALCUL—AfOWT09 '4 aePw DETERMINING COST AND DELIVERY OF MATERIALS TO SITE. CCM00010 1 u1 f t 1.11 lit Mission Mission Park Drive 't REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE \. / ®mMYORaw..«.rw.0 lw.'n�n...wfaafe 1 l` j %�w1ryOPw....ow.rwu: 14A.rwe.fwwf..mw.o t,m• �PMq wrrwuaf •ri¢ff.v.aPa.°a•ou:ncow•. uw• �m� rmefa ew:na°arrtvofww uaf• a pk�f. wwf E \ Proposed Building 0 \ ,. .,• "; m ��.allay IQt.W 4.11�� . ....IwwN �� f,• .......... u�in fes. j P� 6 W �' Fuw: ao.f•°•x IPt.u,lelrp.•.ury r4TM •uln 1 ncY, F'M^° 9.pW N , i '.,6MMTfYTOrLLVMTG USE L / a IN T:•fr Fn1017 a:f "ri /-YuxM OfYWI .. I'M . .� - .. I/ BtlW 1MW 6xldq Na LbYOeuf ���pp�n:fnn ua - � 1 •grew t ai f S' .t-°" ror4[rvN tlfn MLllf pu/n pp : i«wa. rncin ar,wnm , �i P-ft j w ¢ ^ U w F 3 �uw a o�� w 0 O �C O N K U W > �O x = FOU� az , r - x_ z La ygg 1 _ 777 0-9 a _ "- 3 hi 44 XW low �a ff gg r. r t x .� .,�„+.�,► :,k*r.a�tt'�';, , �.. r, s"-�°k"'� `����'�_ ,•_.. �A:',:, tn'b ,y; was„ x THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ; 0 CUCAMOHNCA AUGUST 5, 2014 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. >.; A ;TO ORDER ACTION Roll Call Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett_ Donald Granger X Alternates: Ray Wimberly_ Frances Howdyshell_ Lou Munoz_ H. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW A. Approved. DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - Site plan and architectural review of a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related cases: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126. EXHIBIT B 1of2 Item H-J21 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA AUGUST 5, 2014 RANCHO CtiCAMONGA B. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DRC2013-00789 - ROUTE 66 B. Approved with a IECA - A request to preserve the Historic Cucamonga Service Station request for a rendering including restoring the front building (Phase 1)and to reconstruct the rear of the station prior to the 2,391 square foot service garage (Phase 2) within the Foothill Boulevard Planning Commission Specialty Commercial (SC) District, located at 9670 Foothill Boulevard - Meeting if possible. APN: 0208-153-05. III. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. IV." ADJOURNMENT 7:41 p.m. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 2 of 2 Item H-J22 a' ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) RANCHO (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) CUCAMONGA Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may reviews the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California- Environmental-Quality Act;, and they City's Rule*,., and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important tQfei information requested -this application be provided in fully Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application; additional information such as,but not limited to; ti Contact Person&Address: John Burroughs, Commerce Construction Co., L.P. 13191 Crossroads Parkway North,6th Floor, City of Industry, CA 91746 Name&Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): Tracy Zinn, T&B Planning 17542 East 17th Street, Suite 100 Tustin, CA 92780 Telephone Number: 714-397-4224 PROJECT INFORMATIONI • Information indicated by an asterisk(*)is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. *1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site,and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east,and west, views intoand from the site from_the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): Southeast corner of Mission Park Drive and Richmond Place. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 229-401-06, 07, 08&09 *5) Gross Site Area(aGsq.ft.): 6.6 acres *6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 6.6 acres dedications): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): The Proposed Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation for the Proposed Project Site from Industrial Park(0.40-0.60 FAR)to General Industrial(0.50 -0.60 FAR)and a Zoning Map Amendment to modify the zoning from Industrial Park(IP)to General Industrial (GI). Updated 4/11/2013 Page 2 of 10 Item H-J24 r ` t 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment,Tentative Parcel Map, Design Review, Grading Permit & Building Permit. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography,soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological and/or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The Proposed Project Site consists of an approximately 6.6-acre lot located along the south side of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The Proposed Project Site includes Assessor's Parcel Numbers(APNs)229-401-06,707, -08, and- -09. Biology Report prepared for the Proposed Project Site indicates that the Site is generally flat, and consists of disturbed, undeveloped land dominated by non-native grasses and forbs and classifies the site as "Disturbed/Ruderal." A Phase I Environmental Assessment identifies prior use of the Proposed Project Site as ranch or agricultural land from at least the mid-1800s into the 1980s. By 1989, the farms had disappeared and the Site was a vacant graded lot. No significant changes have occurred since that time. The Phase I Environmental Assessment states that regulatory database information identified no known or suspected contamination sites within the Proposed Project Site and few known or suspected contamination sites in the area surrounding the Proposed Project Site. Sources: Biological Technical Report for the CSF Project located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, prepared by Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. and Phase I Environmental Assessment, 6.6-acre property, Mission Park Drive and Buffalo Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California prepared by SCS Engineers. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 3 of 10 Item H-J25 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): According to the Phase I Environmental Assessment, the Proposed Project Site was used as ranch or agricultural land from at least the mid-1800s into the 1980s. Cultural and paleontological reports have not been conducted for the Proposed Project Site, and due to the Site's extensive past disturbance from agricultural activity, there is little to no liklihood of cultural resources being present on the Site. 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: A noise study has not been conducted to determine the existing noise levels. However, due to the Proposed Project Site's proximity to 4th Street, located approximately 700 feet to the south, and Interstate 15, located approximate 0.30 miles to the east,there are likely to be existing noise levels commensurate with the traffic associated with those roadways. The Proposed Project is a warehouse,which is not a noise-sensitive use. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: The Proposed Project consists of a General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment,Tentative Parcel Map and Design Review to allow for the construction of a warehouse and distribution facility on a 6.6 acre site.The Proposed Project consists of a single building comprised of 128,383 square feet of warehousing and 11,600 square feet of office space.The Proposed Project would include 103 standard automobile parking spaces and 15 tractor trailer parking spaces. The Proposed Project would include 14 loading bays and two vehicular access ramps. Access to the Proposed Project Site would be from Richmond Place in two locations, and from Buffalo Avenue from two locations.A detention basin and City standard recycling and trash enclosures would be located on the southern portion of the Site. Monumentation signs would be located adjacent to the two southern entries to the site from Richmond Place and Buffalo Ave. The Proposed Project would be constructed in one phase. 13) Describe the surrounding properties,including information on plants and animals and any cultural,historical,or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment,houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage,setback,rear yard, etc.): The Proposed Project Site is a vacant parcel surrounded by fully developed industrial and commercial properties. To the north is a multi-tenant commercial building designated as General Industrial(GI);to the east is an industrial building designated as Industrial Park(IP);to the south is a two-tenant commercial building designated as IP; to the west is a collection of commercial buildings designated as IP and industrial buildings designed as GI. Surrounding building heights are two stories and setback from public right of ways are-25 ft. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 Item H-J26 r 31 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale,or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The area surrounding the Proposed Project Site consists of industrial and commercial uses, including distribution warehouses to the north and east.The Proposed Project is consistent with the pattern, scale and character of the surrounding general area. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? A noise.study has not been prepared to evaluate noise levels. Short-term noise would occur during Project construction. Long-term noise would be limited to vehicular-related noise associated with vehicles traveling to from the Site and circulating within the Site. Surrounding uses are industrial and commercial,which are not noise-sensitive uses. Noise levels would be compatible with adjacent uses and no adverse effects will occur. `16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: Photographs of the Proposed Project Site show no mature or scenic trees located on the Site. 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: The Proposed Project Site drains to the City storm drain. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909) 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) N/A Peak use(gal/Day) N/A 020 b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) 21Peak use(gal/min/ac) 5 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. 0 Septic Tank x© Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909) 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) N/A b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) 2,020 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 Item H-J27 26) Total Floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 128,383 square feet of warehouse. 11,600 square feet of office. 27) Indicate hours of operation: M — F (8am — 5pm) 28) Number of employees: Total: 30 Maximum Shift: 30 Time of Maximum Shift: 8am-5pm 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): Warehouse Labor (Wage range $10 - $20 an hour). Starting hire rate $10/hr. Clerical /Order desk (Wage range $9 - $18 an hour). Starting hire rate $9/hr. Supervisors (Salary range $40 K - $60 K per year). Starting hire rate $40 K/per year. 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: 15 '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): An Air Quality analysis has not been conducted. Short-term air pollutant emissions would be expected during the construction phase of the Proposed Project, primarily associated with dust emissions during ground - disturbing activities and exhaust emissions from construction equipment. During long-term operation of the Proposed Project, the primary source of air pollutants would be mobile source emissions associated with motor vehicles traveling to and from the Site and circulating within the Site. ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. Water, sewer, fire and flood control agencies serving the Proposed Project have not been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate services to the Proposed Project. Updated 4/11/2013 Item H -J29 Page 7 of 10 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, it known. A Phase I Environmental Assessment was conducted for the Site in April 2013. The Phase I found no evidence of the use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials on the property. Source: Phase I Environmental Assessment, 6.6 -acre property, Mission Park Drive and Buffalo Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California prepared by SCS Engineers. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. There are currently no plans for the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials by the Proposed Project's expected tenant. 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: Signature: Updated 4/11/2013 Title: Item H -J30 Page 8 of 10 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single -Family Multi -Family Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional Institutional/Government Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flows Single -Family Multi -Family General Commercial Office Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/day/acre 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updated 4/11/2013 Item H -J31 Page 9 of 10 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 Updated 4/11/2013 Item H -J32 KI Page 10 of 10 HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE STATEMENT I have been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga of my responsibilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5 (copy attached) to notify the City as to whether the site for which a development application has been submitted is located within an area which has been designated as the location of a hazardous waste site by the Office of Planning and Research, State of California (OPR). I have also been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga that, as of the date of executing this Statement OPR has not yet compiled and distributed a list of hazardous waste site as required by said Section 65962.5. I am informed and believe that the proposed site for which a development application has been submitted is not within any area specified in said Section 65962.5 as a hazardous waste site. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Applicant: Dated: Updated 4/11/2013 Item H -J33 Page 5 of 5 _-.. VYOd u01is�0aiad - CO N LU . vLU r l J i i z q ; Z ` C'.4 (J J y ;o° C!3 JP ri I . ,w.}o.rew..••.�mR.a,•it • ' wsx-..-a-C. xk'-�s,.��.-. - . _ s_. W j UJI . � ' + J J •moi ♦ •�) � . a go V4'.. _ i ley • N i, I � r' � I I ,� � t� (" ern � c.� [ e •8 •t � �: ,� t � �,. f } ,'49 7� rK.96: ►1 tY.l� i ' - - z_ I__. LL Y.....w K M3A`YHU, h 6. it i Adapted from USGS Guasti, CA quadrangle Z Q 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet Item H -J34 `A m n Photograph 1: Northeastern view of Project site. Notice the disturbance and lack of native vegetation present. LJ LO x W Photograph 2: Northern view of Project site. Notice the disturbed nature of the site, along with the lack of native vegetation. Item H -J36 Photograph 3: Northwestern view of Project site. Notice the disturbance and lack of native vegetation present. G) W F -- _Q U O U) Q O z z UJ J M U Photograph 4: Western view of Project site. Notice the disturbed nature of the site, along with the lack of native vegetation. Item H -J37 E HE? u -x CY CY N EEE till :0 5'3G - a .[.c n::"r �xK _..wx�y b`_ OLLS3f'dW VONOWVOnO OHON.rd ens. ®yews iN3WdOlaA'4a W ISMNI ALIV3H miss m .r air�ar?nnrtuo�rxxnao NVId 3DS C anuany olegng Item H -J38 • City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review DRC2014-00127 INITIAL STUDY PART 11 2. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126. 3. Description of Project: The proposed project is the construction of a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a vacant parcel of 6.6 acres located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. The underlying General Plan designation of the property is Industrial Park and the underlying zoning designation of the project site is Industrial Park (IP) District. The project includes a request to change the zoning designation of the project site from Industrial Park (IP) District to General Industrial (GI) District (General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126). The Development Code.. distinguishes warehouse/storage/distribution tenants who occupy tenant spaces of 50,000 square feet or less as Wholesale, Storage and Distribution - Light and tenants who occupy over 50,000 square feet as Wholesale, Storage and Distribution - Medium. The Industrial Park (IP) District only permits • Wholesale, Storage and Distribution — Light and not Medium. The applicant is requesting to construct a 139,983 square foot building designed for warehouse/storage/distribution tenants over 50,000 square feet. In order to do so, the land use designation must be changed from Industrial Park (IP) District to General Industrial (GI) District, which permits Wholesale, Storage and Distribution — Medium. 4. Applicant: Commerce Construction Company, LLC 13191 Crossroads Parkway North City of Industry, CA 91746 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park 6. Zoning: Industrial Park (IP) District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is vacant land that has been graded and street improvements have been installed. The site drains roughly north to south and is dominated by non-native grasses. The site is surrounded by industrial buildings to the north, east and west in the General Industrial (GI) District and by a commercial development to the south in the Industrial Park (IP) District. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 Item H -J39 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 2 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: NIA GLOSSARY — The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD — California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD — Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR— Environmental Impact Report FEIR — Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx — Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PM,o — Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB — Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD _ South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP — Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," 'Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or."Less Than -Significant -Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓) Aesthetics (./)Biological Resources (✓) Greenhouse Gas Emissions () Land Use & Planning () Population & Housing (✓) Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION (✓) Agricultural Resources (✓) Cultural Resources () Hazards & Waste Materials () Mineral Resources () Public Services () Utilities & Service Systems (✓) Air Quality (✓) Geology & Soils (✓) Hydrology & Water Quality (✓ ) Noise () Recreation () Mandatory Findings of Significance On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (✓) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a 'Potentially Significant Impact' or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J40 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 3 ® () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. • Prepared By: 44-1-1 1 I9 iN Reviewed By:Date: N r Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J41 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Less Than a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Signa fiantaily Significant wnn hfitigafion Than SigNficentNo Em not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic Impact Incorporated IMP44 act EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? () () () (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU -6. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The site is located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is characterized by industrial development to the north, east and west and by commercial development to the south. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project as the surrounding development is of similar design and density. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot offiicetwarehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards including using shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J42 • • • Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. Less Than a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () Significant Less ( ) and SupportingInformation Sources: Potentially Significant with Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (✓) Williamson Act contract? C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re -zoning of, () () () (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g) d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest () () () (✓) land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is characterized by industrial development to the north, east and west and by commercial development to the south. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J43 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The site is located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is characterized by industrial development to the north, east and west and by commercial development to the south. The nearest agricultural use is more than 2 miles west from the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: Less Than a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () Significant Less I Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potenfia slgnfNeant With MlGgation Than significant No b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute Impact Incorporated Impact Impact zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The site is located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is characterized by industrial development to the north, east and west and by commercial development to the south. The nearest agricultural use is more than 2 miles west from the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (✓) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (✓) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the air quality management plan (AQMP) (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. ' . The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J44 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 b) Both the State of California and the federal government have established health -based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM,o and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). • The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non -attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non -Attainment Status for Ozone, PM,o and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air • impact study was prepared by Urban Crossroads (April 21, 2014) that utilizes CaIEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J45 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant with N igation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Im ct Im act b) Both the State of California and the federal government have established health -based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM,o and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). • The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non -attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non -Attainment Status for Ozone, PM,o and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air • impact study was prepared by Urban Crossroads (April 21, 2014) that utilizes CaIEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J45 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Terra (Construction) 6mipacts There will be minimal short term impact related to the project. New construction related to the project will consist of a tilt -up building, street improvements, new landscaping, paving and screen walls. The mitigation measures outlined below will reduce the potential effects on the environment to less than significant. Table 1: Construction Emissions without Mitigation mn Less Than 2015 161 117.79 70.32 0.09 Significant Less '.Nib' 109:9 Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With NGtigafion Than Significant NO :Maximum Daily EMissiCMs 269.69 Impact Incorporated Impact Impact emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Terra (Construction) 6mipacts There will be minimal short term impact related to the project. New construction related to the project will consist of a tilt -up building, street improvements, new landscaping, paving and screen walls. The mitigation measures outlined below will reduce the potential effects on the environment to less than significant. Table 1: Construction Emissions without Mitigation Table 2: Construction Emissions with Mitigations - - - -- mn _ 2015 161 117.79 70.32 0.09 U& 'S.48 '.Nib' 109:9 51:31 2.5_41 MOS 313 :2_61 :Maximum Daily EMissiCMs 269.69 1317.79 70.32 0109 16.01 8.40 SCAQMD Regional Thixwb¢ld. 75 100 550' 15o 160 55 Ttiv�sd9n�d EXteede413YES VES ib0 No � No Table 2: Construction Emissions with Mitigations - - - -- mn _ 2015 2.90 47.59: 49.33 OA9 12,90 5.73 2016 6517 35.41 25.03 0.05 2.03 1.7.6 mauimum 6altb Ermissiions 65.87 4739 49.33 0.09 1196 5.73 $CAQMO Regional Thresbeld 75 100 55.0 15o iso 55 ThresbcdclE xci'eded? Wo No No iso. ido: 'No Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources, such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. The most recent version of CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) was used to calculate the construction emissions as shown on Tables 1 and 2 above. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut -and -fill grading operations. Dust generated during Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J46 • • Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 construction varies substantially on a project -by -project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Tables 1 and 2 above lists total construction emissions that have incorporated a number of feasible control measures that can be reasonably implemented to significantly reduce PM10 emissions from construction activities. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that application of the architectural coatings for the proposed peak construction day will result in a peak of 65.87 lbs/day of VOCs using mitigation measures MM AQ -1 and MM AQ -2. Therefore, VOC emissions will not exceed for SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day with the following mitigation measures: 1) The project shall implement Mitigation Measures MM AQ -1 and MM AQ -2 for the reduction of VOC emissions below SCAQMD Regional Threshold levels as follows: Only "Zero -Volatile Organic Compounds" paints (no more than 150 gram/liter of VOC) and/or High Pressure Low Volume (HPLV) applications consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113 shall be used. During construction activity, all construction equipment (equal to or greater than 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARR) Tier 3 Certified or better. Additionally, during grading activity, total horsepower -hours per day for all- equipment shall not exceed 18,088 horsepower -hours per day and the maximum disturbance (actively graded) area shall not exceed 5 acres per day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors.' Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the • counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J47 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant ote a t nt With Mitigation lincorporated Than Significant No Impact Impact . Impact construction varies substantially on a project -by -project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Tables 1 and 2 above lists total construction emissions that have incorporated a number of feasible control measures that can be reasonably implemented to significantly reduce PM10 emissions from construction activities. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that application of the architectural coatings for the proposed peak construction day will result in a peak of 65.87 lbs/day of VOCs using mitigation measures MM AQ -1 and MM AQ -2. Therefore, VOC emissions will not exceed for SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day with the following mitigation measures: 1) The project shall implement Mitigation Measures MM AQ -1 and MM AQ -2 for the reduction of VOC emissions below SCAQMD Regional Threshold levels as follows: Only "Zero -Volatile Organic Compounds" paints (no more than 150 gram/liter of VOC) and/or High Pressure Low Volume (HPLV) applications consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113 shall be used. During construction activity, all construction equipment (equal to or greater than 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARR) Tier 3 Certified or better. Additionally, during grading activity, total horsepower -hours per day for all- equipment shall not exceed 18,088 horsepower -hours per day and the maximum disturbance (actively graded) area shall not exceed 5 acres per day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors.' Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the • counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J47 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Rev 2-26-13 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project - specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the-FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 2) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 4) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 5) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 6) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Item H -J48 Leu Than Significant lincorDorated Leu Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant wdh Mtigation Than Significant No Impact IMDaCt Impact Rev 2-26-13 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project - specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the-FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 2) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 4) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 5) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 6) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Item H -J48 • �J Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 7) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 8) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 9) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 10) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM,o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less -than -significant. Long Term (Operational) Impacts Long Term Project Operational Emissions Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project -related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of industrial buildings in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. Based on trip generation factors included in the traffic study (Urban Crossroads, April 2014), long-term operation emissions associated with the proposed project, calculated with the CalEEMod model (Version 2013.2.2) shows that the increase of all criteria pollutants as a result of the proposed project would be less than the corresponding SCAQMD daily emission thresholds (see Table 3 below). Therefore, project -related long-term air quality impacts would not be significant. Mitigation measures would not be required. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J49 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 7) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 8) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 9) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 10) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM,o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less -than -significant. Long Term (Operational) Impacts Long Term Project Operational Emissions Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project -related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of industrial buildings in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. Based on trip generation factors included in the traffic study (Urban Crossroads, April 2014), long-term operation emissions associated with the proposed project, calculated with the CalEEMod model (Version 2013.2.2) shows that the increase of all criteria pollutants as a result of the proposed project would be less than the corresponding SCAQMD daily emission thresholds (see Table 3 below). Therefore, project -related long-term air quality impacts would not be significant. Mitigation measures would not be required. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J49 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Table 3: Summary of Peak Operational Emission (summer and winter) a. �.v•�' _ -•Y Less Than Atea Source. 2–!;Me-4 4A6 230e4 Significant Less 9.00e-5 and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mfi6gafion ThanIssues Significant No 4.80e-4 Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Table 3: Summary of Peak Operational Emission (summer and winter) a. �.v•�' _ -•Y Area'Soiir'ced.4C Atea Source. 2–!;Me-4 4A6 230e4 0.03 – 9.00e-5 9.WieL5 EhergySnurim 0_07 8:85e-3 OAS O.b7 4.80e-4 642e•3 6.13e-3 lWobile:'{PmongeFCars) 14:84 L17 Lis 19.35 0.00 357 096 Motiile(TrucW 1W 2:66 48.50 24;52 0.12 4.56 1.84 tlA;lodmYT Rany Emissions 81:4. 830 49.76 41.97 016 g;14 3ai SoNaMp RegionaI Threshdid 55 55 55 550 150 150 55 Thred+old Exceeded? 140 NO NO NO NO no .. g: _ _,..;St' ear)o'r ..... V�Sy, - :rte •w�"S^Jp!,• �.v•�' _ -•Y Area'Soiir'ced.4C 2–!;Me-4 0.03 – 9:90e S 9.ODe3 'Energy $ourcg smp73 1P.0g 0_07 4200-4 6:12e-3 6_1211Z_3 Motile IP-'%enger Lars) 1A9 :1.26: 14:84 0.04 3.57 0.96 Mobile:fTmcks) .2.72 5056 25:$6 1W 4#5 1.85 Madinum Daily Emissions 8.27 34.90 4080 oas 81:4. 2.82 SCAQMD Regional Vdesficld 55 55 550 TSO 150 55 Thresfiold E =,Wed? NO No NO NQ M NO 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (long term) Long Term (Operational) Emissions - The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less -than -significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 2) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 3) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 4) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 5) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 6) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J50 U 0 • Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 7) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC -03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 8) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of. 10 minutes). 9) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 10) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 11) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/stora-ge/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 0.25 - mile of a sensitive receptor, a hotel, Courtyard by Marriott, at 11525 Mission Vista Drive located 325 feet southwest from the project site. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super -Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less -than -significant levels. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J51 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC -03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 8) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of. 10 minutes). 9) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 10) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 11) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/stora-ge/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 0.25 - mile of a sensitive receptor, a hotel, Courtyard by Marriott, at 11525 Mission Vista Drive located 325 feet southwest from the project site. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super -Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less -than -significant levels. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J51 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 14 e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from residential uses would include cooking and gardening. Similarly common odors associated with mixed-use and commercial land uses would be expected (i.e. restaurants). Local odors from the majority of land uses would be similar to other urban areas and would not be considered significant. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and therefore are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () Significant Less ( ) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Mfigafion Than Significant No identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status Impact Incorporated Impact]1 act e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from residential uses would include cooking and gardening. Similarly common odors associated with mixed-use and commercial land uses would be expected (i.e. restaurants). Local odors from the majority of land uses would be similar to other urban areas and would not be considered significant. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and therefore are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () V) () ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () V) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () V) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () V) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () V) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with industrial uses. The site has previously been graded and regularly cleared of brush. The project site is sporadically vegetated by weedy invasive plants commonly found in areas with a high level of disturbance. A Biological Technical Report (Glenn Lukos Asssociates, Inc., July 2013) was submitted with the project. The report concluded that the project site does not contain desirable habitat for special status species. Therefore, significant cumulative effect to Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J52 • �i • Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 biological resources as a result of the proposed project are not anticipated. According to the report, no impact to the burrowing owl is expected to occur due to a lack of suitable habitat. However, a 30 -day pre -construction burrowing owl survey is recommended as a mitigation measure. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated with the following mitigation measure. 1) A 30 -day pre -construction burrowing owl survey is required prior to approval of a rough grading permit. According to the General Plan Figure RC -4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area with a soil types that accommodate the Delhi Sands flower -loving -,fly. The Biological Technical Report (Glenn Lukos Asssociates, Inc., July 2013) submitted for the project concluded that due to the past high level of disturbance, combined with the lack of dunes and presence of compacted, graded soil, that no further biological studies for the fly are required. Additionally, no other sensitive biological resources or endangered species of plants or animals were found on the site. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There is one heritage tree on the project site that will be integrated into the project site and not removed. Therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC -1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant with Mfitigatian Than Significant No § 15064.5? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact biological resources as a result of the proposed project are not anticipated. According to the report, no impact to the burrowing owl is expected to occur due to a lack of suitable habitat. However, a 30 -day pre -construction burrowing owl survey is recommended as a mitigation measure. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated with the following mitigation measure. 1) A 30 -day pre -construction burrowing owl survey is required prior to approval of a rough grading permit. According to the General Plan Figure RC -4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area with a soil types that accommodate the Delhi Sands flower -loving -,fly. The Biological Technical Report (Glenn Lukos Asssociates, Inc., July 2013) submitted for the project concluded that due to the past high level of disturbance, combined with the lack of dunes and presence of compacted, graded soil, that no further biological studies for the fly are required. Additionally, no other sensitive biological resources or endangered species of plants or animals were found on the site. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There is one heritage tree on the project site that will be integrated into the project site and not removed. Therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC -1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (✓) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological (.) (✓) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J53 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 16 d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () Less Than (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant with Nfigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () FF7 (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation) Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is. known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). In compliance with California SB18 for projects that include a General Plan Amendment, project notification was submitted on February 25, 2014 to local tribal communities (as listed by the Native American Heritage Commission) for comment. None of the communities that were contacted requested consultation. Additionally, a request was sent to the Archaeological Information Center at the San Bernardino County Museum for a Historical Resources Review. The report was received on March 20, 2014 and found that there were no previously recorded historical resources recorded within or adjacent to the project area. Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J54 U • :7 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere -of - Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. Additionally, per a report received from the Archaeological Information Center at the San Bernardino County Museum, dated March 20, 2014, there were no previously recorded historical resources recorded within or adjacent to the project area. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities,. to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. Additionally, per a report received from Archaeological Information Center at the San Bernardino County Museum, dated March 20, 2014, there were no previously recorded historical resources recorded within or adjacent to the project area. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J55 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant win Mitigation Than Significant I N. Impact Incorporated Impact Impact C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere -of - Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. Additionally, per a report received from the Archaeological Information Center at the San Bernardino County Museum, dated March 20, 2014, there were no previously recorded historical resources recorded within or adjacent to the project area. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities,. to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. Additionally, per a report received from Archaeological Information Center at the San Bernardino County Museum, dated March 20, 2014, there were no previously recorded historical resources recorded within or adjacent to the project area. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 18 event human remains are discovered on-site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project. Less Than a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant with Nfitigafion ThanIssues Significant No death involving: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact event human remains are discovered on-site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (✓) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including () () () (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (✓) () ( ) C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off=site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS -2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault passes within 3.7 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 6.3 miles north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is about 16 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is about 18 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less -than -significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J56 u • • Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types on-site consist of Delhi Fine Sand (Db) Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Delhi Fine Sand (Db) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically nearly level to strongly slopping soil is on alluvial fans that have been reworked by wind action. Runoff is very slow, and the hazard of soil blowing is generally moderate. In unprotected area, however, the hazard of soil blowing is high. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J57 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: any ant Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types on-site consist of Delhi Fine Sand (Db) Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Delhi Fine Sand (Db) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically nearly level to strongly slopping soil is on alluvial fans that have been reworked by wind action. Runoff is very slow, and the hazard of soil blowing is generally moderate. In unprotected area, however, the hazard of soil blowing is high. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J57 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 20 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project. Less Than a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or () Significant Less () and Supporting Information Sources: Fi ally Significant With NGtigation ThanIssues Significant No environment? Impact Inco orated Impact Impact 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project. a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or () (✓) () () indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? () () ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Regulations and Significance - The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act (92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green�House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N20], hydrofluorocarbons [HFCs], perfluorocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]. The combined emissions of these well -mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of .three to four degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in -State and out -of -State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J58 • • 0. Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Rev 2-26-13 (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA,- the project has been analyzed based on a performance based standard") (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PM,o, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM,o, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's - Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. A greenhouse gas analysis was prepared for the project (Urban Crossroads, April 2014) that reviewed the long term project related operational emissions. The report concluded that the project will result in approximately 2,731.66 MTCO2e per year as shown on Table 1 below; the proposed project would not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur. Item H -J59 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially ificant Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No impact Incorporated Impact Impact Rev 2-26-13 (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA,- the project has been analyzed based on a performance based standard") (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PM,o, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM,o, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's - Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. A greenhouse gas analysis was prepared for the project (Urban Crossroads, April 2014) that reviewed the long term project related operational emissions. The report concluded that the project will result in approximately 2,731.66 MTCO2e per year as shown on Table 1 below; the proposed project would not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur. Item H -J59 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Table 1: Total Proiect Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Annual) Less Than '�' •l WE— _�'Tr �raj.' �"'i%.� �" ..4'vi Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: PP g PotIssues Significant Significant With Nfitigafion Than Than No 5.4 e•3 2.1113e -S Impact Incorporated Imp Ins aet Table 1: Total Proiect Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Annual) Source: ealEtwd1° model ou4sut, See Awmdlx 31 ibr detailed modeloutputs Note: Tatatsobwned.6om Ealfflaod"aM.-may not toW WO due to idLnding. Table results Include sdentlfic ntdatibn.tts•u$ed to.reprewt"me3 ten m1sed.totheyoWaro/(wi+ich dwdd.be wr8ten as.x le')and Is followed by the value blttic'efpohent Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions. result from construction activities associated with diesel - powered construction equipment and other combustion sources O.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil -based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, CH4, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than - significant levels: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J60 '�' •l WE— _�'Tr �raj.' �"'i%.� �" ..4'vi Annual constriction -related entiWWis amortized 2.49 CLOW7 giver 30.years Area 5.4 e•3 2.1113e -S 632e3 Energy 121:06 5.99e-3 1:40e-3 121.61 Mobllesoupoes (Pa3ssenger'Cars) 51014 M02 — 510.66 Moble•Sources('rruda) 3;034.76 .0.02 waste' . 26.71 1:58 — 59.87 waterllsase 3,62 0.03 6.70e4l 4.39 TQW CO2E (All $Ottrfet] 2 3166 Source: ealEtwd1° model ou4sut, See Awmdlx 31 ibr detailed modeloutputs Note: Tatatsobwned.6om Ealfflaod"aM.-may not toW WO due to idLnding. Table results Include sdentlfic ntdatibn.tts•u$ed to.reprewt"me3 ten m1sed.totheyoWaro/(wi+ich dwdd.be wr8ten as.x le')and Is followed by the value blttic'efpohent Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions. result from construction activities associated with diesel - powered construction equipment and other combustion sources O.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil -based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, CH4, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than - significant levels: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J60 i-1 LJ Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Lorm Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to'the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a worst case scenario with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. As noted above, the project involves the construction of a 139,983 square foot warehouse and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: 1) Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. 2) Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 3) Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, use daylight as an integral part of the lighting systems in buildings. 4) Install light-colored "cool' roofs and cool pavements. 5) Install energy-efficient heating and cooling systems, appliances and equipment and control systems. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. Additionally, the City is participating in the • development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J61 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Im act 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Lorm Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to'the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a worst case scenario with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. As noted above, the project involves the construction of a 139,983 square foot warehouse and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: 1) Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. 2) Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 3) Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, use daylight as an integral part of the lighting systems in buildings. 4) Install light-colored "cool' roofs and cool pavements. 5) Install energy-efficient heating and cooling systems, appliances and equipment and control systems. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. Additionally, the City is participating in the • development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J61 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 24 The project's long term operation emissions will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed any of the SCAOMD's thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a significant long term impact with the following mitigation measures: 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develop the site utilizing shade, 'prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by, installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J62 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially SignificaifiwM With Mtigation Than Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact The project's long term operation emissions will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed any of the SCAOMD's thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a significant long term impact with the following mitigation measures: 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develop the site utilizing shade, 'prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by, installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J62 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 25 The GHG emissions created by the proposed project have been analyzed based on the proposed thresholds and guidelines provided by SCAQMD. As currently proposed by CARB, a quantitative threshold of 7,000 metric tons of CO2e per year for operational emissions (excluding transportation) and performance standards yet to be defined for construction and transportation emissions are under consideration. However, CARB's proposal is not yet final, and thus cannot be applied to the project. Initially, SCAQMD staff presented the working group with a significance threshold that could be applied to various types Af project — residential; non-residential; industrial; etc. However the threshold is still under development. In December 2008, staff presented the SCAQMD Governing Board with a significance threshold for stationary source projects where it is the lead agency. This threshold uses a tiered approach to determine a project's significance, with 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) as a screening numerical threshold for industrial projects. The thresholds for GHG emissions were determined at the SCAQMD's Working Group's eighth meeting on January 28, 2009. The working group released these thresholds for projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency. The threshold requires that project related GHG emissions be less than 10,000 tons per year of CO2e. Since the SCAQMD provided substantial evidence in determining their draft GHG emission • thresholds, this analysis has utilized 10,000 metric tons per year of CO2e as the threshold. The greenhouse gas analysis that was prepared for the project (Urban Crossroads, April 2014) concluded that the project will result in approximately 2,731.66 MTCO2e per year as shown on Table 1 above and will not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, the project would not result in a significant impact on GHG. b) The project proposes the construction of a 139,983 square foot warehouse. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard. Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re -use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J63 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiallyignifnt Significant With Mitigation Than SignificantNo Impact Incorporated Impact I act The GHG emissions created by the proposed project have been analyzed based on the proposed thresholds and guidelines provided by SCAQMD. As currently proposed by CARB, a quantitative threshold of 7,000 metric tons of CO2e per year for operational emissions (excluding transportation) and performance standards yet to be defined for construction and transportation emissions are under consideration. However, CARB's proposal is not yet final, and thus cannot be applied to the project. Initially, SCAQMD staff presented the working group with a significance threshold that could be applied to various types Af project — residential; non-residential; industrial; etc. However the threshold is still under development. In December 2008, staff presented the SCAQMD Governing Board with a significance threshold for stationary source projects where it is the lead agency. This threshold uses a tiered approach to determine a project's significance, with 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) as a screening numerical threshold for industrial projects. The thresholds for GHG emissions were determined at the SCAQMD's Working Group's eighth meeting on January 28, 2009. The working group released these thresholds for projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency. The threshold requires that project related GHG emissions be less than 10,000 tons per year of CO2e. Since the SCAQMD provided substantial evidence in determining their draft GHG emission • thresholds, this analysis has utilized 10,000 metric tons per year of CO2e as the threshold. The greenhouse gas analysis that was prepared for the project (Urban Crossroads, April 2014) concluded that the project will result in approximately 2,731.66 MTCO2e per year as shown on Table 1 above and will not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, the project would not result in a significant impact on GHG. b) The project proposes the construction of a 139,983 square foot warehouse. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard. Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re -use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J63 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: Less Than a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No disposal of hazardous materials? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The proposed 139,983 square foot building is designed for the storage and distribution of finished products and will not include activities that utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. The General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment changing the land use from Industrial Park to General Industrial Park will not. significantly change the types of uses permitted on the site or the types of stored materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J64 • r� • Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than - significant. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed 139,98.3 square foot building is designed for the storage and distribution of finished products and will not include activities that utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) There are no schools located within 0.25 -mile of the project site. The nearest school, Rancho Cucamonga Middle School at 10022 Feron Boulevard, is located about 2 miles to the northwest of the project site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS -7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. The project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all .applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind -driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS -1. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J65 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Than No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than - significant. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed 139,98.3 square foot building is designed for the storage and distribution of finished products and will not include activities that utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) There are no schools located within 0.25 -mile of the project site. The nearest school, Rancho Cucamonga Middle School at 10022 Feron Boulevard, is located about 2 miles to the northwest of the project site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS -7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. The project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all .applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind -driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS -1. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J65 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 28 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Less Than a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () Significant less ( ) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mtlgatlon Than Significant No b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere Impact Incorporated impact Im act 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (✓) () ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (✓) g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as () () () (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures () () () (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, _ including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J66 • • Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by PBLA Engineering (May, 20, 2014) which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: Rev 2-26-13 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance Item H -J67 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: SignificPotentially ant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by PBLA Engineering (May, 20, 2014) which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: Rev 2-26-13 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance Item H -J67 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 30 program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specfed time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational - 1) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by PBLA Engineering (May, 20, 2014) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC -3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J68 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant:No Impact Inco orated Impact program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specfed time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational - 1) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by PBLA Engineering (May, 20, 2014) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC -3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J68 • • Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 31 proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004.. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NO1) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100 -year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete -lined channels, and underground storm drains as Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J69 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiallyignifnt Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004.. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NO1) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100 -year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete -lined channels, and underground storm drains as Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J69 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 32 shown in General Plan Figure PS -6. The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. D There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non -significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project a) Physically divide an established community? () Less Than () V) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () Significant Less (1) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, Impact trio orated Impact Impact shown in General Plan Figure PS -6. The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. D There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non -significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project a) Physically divide an established community? () () () V) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (1) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is characterized by industrial development to the north, east and west and by commercial development to the south. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding industrial development to the north, east and west. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The new land use and zoning designation will not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated C) According to the General Plan Figure RC -4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area with a soil type that accommodates the Delhi Sands flower -loving fly. The Biological Technical Report (Glenn Lukos Asssociates, Inc., July 2013) submitted for the project concluded that due to the past high level of disturbance, combined with the lack of dunes and presence of compacted, graded soil, that no further biological studies for the fly are required. Additionally, no other sensitive biological resources or endangered species of plants or animals were found on the site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -HO • Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 33 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than a). Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than residents of the State? Significant Mitigation Significant No b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important Impact incorporated Im act Im act 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a). Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () (} (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local () () () (✓) general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC -2 and Table RC -1. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC -2 and Table RC -1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (✓) () ( } excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise (} () () (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (✓) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () (} (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS -9 at build -out. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. 40b) The City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed building; hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby commercial uses is expected. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess. of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J71 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 34 are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specked in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J72 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With tu6lfgation Than Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Impact are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specked in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J72 • is Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 35 traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project. Less Than a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No businesses) or indirectly (for example, through Impact Incorporated Impact Impact traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project. a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is vacant land. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) Refer to 13.b above. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J73 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 36 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial Less Than adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of Impact incorporated Impact IMP20 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () (✓) b) Police protection? () () () (✓) C) Schools? () () () (✓) d) Parks? () () () (✓) e) Other public facilities? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The site is located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and will be served by a Fire Station #4 at 11297 Jersey Boulevard, located approximately 1 mile north from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project. site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. No impacts are anticipated. C) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Old Town Park at 10033 Feron Boulevard, is located 2 miles northwesterly from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J74 • is • Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 37 Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot offiice/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to a less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. No impacts are anticipated. 15. RECREATION. Mould the project: Less Than a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () Significant Less (✓) and Supporting Information Sources: Pally Significant with Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No substantial physical deterioration of the facility would Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot offiice/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to a less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. No impacts are anticipated. 15. RECREATION. Mould the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or () () () (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Old Town Park at 10033 Feron Boulevard, is located 2 miles northwesterly from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) Refer to 15.a above. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J75 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 38 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: Less Than a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s cant With Mitigation icant Signif Ne performance of the circulation system, taking into I act Incorporated Impact 'Mpa 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy () () () (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management () () () (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () ( Y. () (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 653 net trip -ends per day on a typical weekday with 55 net vehicles per hour during the weekday AM peak and 59 net vehicles per hour during the weekday PM peak hour. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. A. Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared for the project (Urban Crossroads, April 2014) which calculated average daily vehicle trips (ADT) based on trip generation rates collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) as presented in ITE's most current edition of Trip Generation (9th Edition, 2012). The Traffic Impact Analysis found that there were no study area intersections that were found to be impacted by the project. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J76 • • • Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 39 project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. The Traffic Impact Analysis also recommends a number of site access improvements. The project will be required to implement the following measure: 1) Implement the site access improvement outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the project (Urban Crossroads, April 2014) and described in Section 1.6.1 (Site Access Improvements) and on Exhibit 1 — 3 (On -Site Access and Circulation Recommendations) of the analysis. b) The proposed project will generate 55 morning two-way peak hour trips and 59 evening two-way peak hour trips. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. C) Located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). No impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J77 Less Than Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: PP g PoteIssues Significantally Significant With Mtiga6on Than Significant No Impact incorporated Impact impact project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. The Traffic Impact Analysis also recommends a number of site access improvements. The project will be required to implement the following measure: 1) Implement the site access improvement outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the project (Urban Crossroads, April 2014) and described in Section 1.6.1 (Site Access Improvements) and on Exhibit 1 — 3 (On -Site Access and Circulation Recommendations) of the analysis. b) The proposed project will generate 55 morning two-way peak hour trips and 59 evening two-way peak hour trips. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. C) Located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). No impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J77 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 40 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Less Than a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potenfia SiSignificantnt With With I Than significant No b) Require or result in the construction of new water or impact Incorporated Impact Impact 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -1 and RP -4 treatment plants. The RP -1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP -4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/stora-ge/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP -1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J78 0 • Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 41 exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP -1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill withsufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Less Than a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () Significant Less (✓) and SupportingInformation Sources: Potentially Significant With I1rLligafion ThanIssues Significant No habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or Impact Inco orated Impact Impact exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP -1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill withsufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J79 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 42 Comments: a) The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC -4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build -out in the City and Sphere -of -Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Development of the site change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction -related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less -than -significant levels. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J80 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Significant win Wiigation Than Significant No Impact incorporated Imp, Im act Comments: a) The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC -4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build -out in the City and Sphere -of -Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Development of the site change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction -related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less -than -significant levels. Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J80 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 ® EARLIER ANALYSES City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 43 Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all .that apply): (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (T) Traffic Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads, April 21, 2014) (T) Biological Technical Report (Glenn Ludos Associates, Inc., July 22, 2013) 0 (T) Air Quality Analysis (Urban Crossroads, April 21, 2014) is (T) Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Urban Crossroads, April 21, 2014) Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J81 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 44 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no.significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: Date: Print Name and Title: Rev 2-26-13 Item H -J82 • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING Project File No.: DRC2014-00127 PROGRAM This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above -listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Item H -J83 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2014-00127 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. I:\PLANNING\Tabe\DRC2014-00127 MMP Form.doc Item H -J84 • • IL J I'I c cc Item H -J85 M O 0) N CL 2N. C E'ys O O :+ V W' v CC cc o nr�: ::td U) Z .., N N N N (Y M y2 d to 0 w w ai � itiV r.. a _Yt{ 0 N w C CO) C c (C a N a N a N a o O 0 0 0 cc _ C •G •L r • a) > •a>) . N N > .� m Lt." M a) ri K: IM O d e44,A O Li "x; U U U U .JA'YAk` c r - O O i" '� O C. M m ,Xr J a a a a -0 a) — a a) C a) U N C N 0.0 — o U J Q L C O N` f0 C 0 LO O 0 0 c y (1) N C •. .+ m== t CL o N a) ., . 0 w N 0« N Q� v N� O O i N U) L M L' � U y w a) Q C U +' a) O �n .. E0 co•� o a) owl`0•> 3v)aa) 0-0 CM �'cc4) V O a) .t N r� N a) (0 C E C �? U` 0 N V` L +� N O C d U :zc ; N O U '� w 3 E 0 0' — w Q N O O ca a) a.. ` N E C N w M •- N O a) :. N_ N V a3>U) a).M� p)O O O— E L E as 0)O Opo 7 >1 7 �" tq fA C� N C O O f C E O aS cm 3:.r -,o p) 0= , rn a) _C U O co 'X N U. Q a) .� N= to r-" •, a) O >` 0 (aM U cn O) O E •, N C U (0 U o .. O U M `N 0 M. E U a s •Q c b 0> a) cca «? c c a) a) rn a a) vJ a:.0 a- cm .N C p N O (a .. N — C (6 = I- •L w -O . + U (9 a) 'O O (0 +� — L C O N C y0�x:=.75 r U Y U V a) cC c0E_. �c p a) c o "a0Q) O 7 ^ O 3 ?crL �oa)am N m 0 a) NNa) v)E 3 V ;:fit; .r to O L- a) j> W N a) N N (p > 1 0 (a O E L C .. a) C C� j, `� ` x O cLC 0 .(A i .0 -0 a) �' c j O M cII N O L w NU cCo N O .� C O N c= o� O C N Q >' a) rn'a 0 3�?ia 3 0 >, a) CL L o w U N .� '- a)U.a) o 0oc`a�a)0-°o 0 camo a)�°(D a>N = c 00Mf.� ; ... �rn0N0M0a? �wo.�:L'w c.caa3� 3'S�mo�iuL `vLQ�� o0t''0a E.=ti as cY., c m Q. o aci aE �'� O Qm Ma2 0 D a�irmOQt w CL—M w0 0 CL m U — a� — CL o E co <(ni' r N M Item H -J85 M O 0) N CL Item H -J86 v c w CL c 0 vU c R O U) z N N N N N N N '7 v W ai V c w � > 0 c O a� O� w a> a a s a a a s Q Q Q 0 0 U! C V) C y G M C iA C y C UJ C y C U 3 U �. C a3 a a) a M a ca a f0 a O a a3 a a3 a V O w O O O O O O O O V U mu 3 m 3 a) 3 D 3 a) 3 2 3 O 3 N 3 rn G m G _c w E ® ai a>i m m > a') a>> m �> Q Q m c V c 3 ._O+ O ` U. U m U U U U U U U U m c c c CL m Q O m O m O m O m O to O m o m O m O to a U) a) >, - V COX- � 'G Q a) a) � U L �+ C '� L C " O L O " .y L O VJ "+ U) C - cc a) m C C O -5 _O C CU o aa)) � E c 3 m o r a 0CC 4) EE m L (D �MQ� DQL O E- >,p C ) ,. O N 0 a) .0. m U U H �a) Ow a) E m > V y 00c O O O p O y C .. ai U y y y t x v, o G y 0) a) 0 -O Q a) a) C O > a) d > x G M O E ai a) 'O G V a) ca .. cm O L _ C .. -O O tf1 >+ O) n3 C� d G .. a� _ cL ao U — r > �' acro E E x 3 :?'v Co O O ° �' 0 c cv JG) G o) C E v L U O O ca .� a) O> O C >+ •- L a) M y f0 f0 M O — m U O V Q X. O yIt a) a O o 0 O O ..oy -0 C a) 8 M x0c O -a = V w �U—oo) M CL y oa Oa� CL ca E' c c tLn C O G a) c U 7L >° m C. uoi V a) d O 0-0 L U N(D y y t3 L c O Q N U E O C °' N' O IM = O 01 a) G .00 x '- O 7 L a) c c4 w +. y G G s- o. 3 C 3 O C L= --->' ca y 'O C >, a) Q v— y >' O M>, m .>�. d (046 d— 3 G y >, 0 L U C Z .� o y C• . o o o cc E c m � c a a �.. a CD M o cc ca o 4) O a� c� -v y - mai W .� ��� 3 O C fC Q (a V N d L- N f0 m yL y y o V N M y a y G 0 0V G C 0)$y >,0 0� C a3 f� V O:711 VM C E O .� G y .L. a) N O C U� M 7 C +' L O NJ O x O a) O O 0 *o OO2O voi-O O O -NQ y>C � O _ .. m o > O y O L O._ flO y 0 () a)ca .. a) 0 M a) - a� N EE��� t 'O ..C y -• c�0y G a) o m W-U3a2dyof/i(Q'ODfCMA(Do0E cv O L O > V E 7 V y 3 y > Ua) cn C d y N y y Q ' d 0 O occ c > `p�7 —m d� a)—VQU>a — v pOQc0� • • e • • • • 3 0.2 �s�Q(n aU 0CL CL g E O O Item H -J86 • • • m v i G o � w a c E 00 �o U) Z N y l0 'a G d � d � w m !0 C O 'iO+ � O O Ci t 2> I Q Q Q a s 0 0 0 V U 7 U O o7 C ,�. O rn 0 v, c C N a c0 a O U 0 0 .� O w O C C C a H > C V 'CG = r C cr 41 cl z U U U U c _y `0 H O O C w m m m m m p '0 Qi m p -o w >. — C O �SEEL m 'o N� @ O� G% A O% -a Gi w L L Q av 16ao`°3 QmM o � � 3 (D �E c � M �. -v `c �' �`°y 0 3 U d o rn OU C a? W � � > LD n N N E v, cm `o > M a`� m��mc o0-0 — j c� O 4) o C �M t V y t O C 0 7 Q cu -C N O C - 3 � O Y a 3 E -0 o L U to CU oa ` 3 c L 3-U Cc U -M ° L C O V1 o O M = vi C cu O cw COL 3°Ccmo 'O OL O O tntL0 O �� E N occoa3i O U vi rn a)o C> CU w Oc 0 > 0 � -p O LO E O M E L +C 7 C ) f -0 N N m L +L C � V t0» O 7 M (D O .Y w 47 A 3 0 Q > G m 0 v 0 � 0 U O m U M C Y C 72 D) o m Q ton N 0)'0 0 O O Z f0 7 - C E •� . C .. 0 O O CO cri > co a Z, v O O C ,(D O a) O V C O -0 -.0 O 7 O f6 ._ > w 0 C O W c C 0 t4 N O 7 -0 M >, .O �t N �. L 0 0 4) C O G co C C- 0 C O 'O (C C c0 7 V O C O 'O M C f6 - 3 0 0 c C 0) M U L U cmw t .O Q C O) N U M E E U W Q O 0p C O E of t�A (Q 0 D N O 3 O 3 N C O C M .L. O 0 0 d Cf C N X .O 0 O. E 0 O N V ;a �' c a a'Ea- U O O O >>' 0 O U E C U O O` E E W U O C Q y O O -� 0 y c6 -D(D O O > O y CL O C 0 cc y LO. c�.,EQ M O0 O.vo cn..o w, • roc U f- 0 co-acn tUMccE Ucn m L�� F- ai ai Co Q y a� m o=0 a o> 00 a> 0 co o E� 5 cis � m �� E 00 _ C _ r c J N M lf� Item H -J87 m v c w 0 cCL E 00 C M rs M Ui ZI I It N N N M y 1p w c m C m >G C O w 'p t0 O v L c c c c a c CO a as a cc a ca � a L Ow O O o O o CD m m m m LD c a>i aa) as C V � c 3 ,+0+ E crm �U. I U U U U co WE _ `O �r m CL m a a a a v 00 r - u, W"o as — m rn L — c o c .r .� t ov"-' Sas p O L O U M= a) N C X -r- N O 3ov, 0 p m O 3� p a) G as. E C ��2 c as cv�c� m c � mo cgs Co C7 � O— c'=�0 cns cCM0 oo =LD c (D a) o0 cJM ;c CMo c� (� cYi� m �— c y --c 0 o f0 C.. O C(L O. C di CL Cc V) i as O. V` p . ` as V C �. Y as M— U N w CV U) as i O— Qaapo y E(aaa L Eo a) CD V O oyc= �'c `cc o E --c EaE�� Ec�L yo_ CO U C 0 0 as O� -p 7 V c c 0 CO U C 0 O c y 0 o C. N� O m� 0 Z = X- �C6= c;o 'o:� o m O ao as Oao = m C p m m -p UW 0 c O C COa��i`W c as co m e c0`a co 4Ei �Y N am 7 V tc=U Hca' V1 _ =� a) 4- (L c is p.. to a- 7 ioC. .b �N �� p '-i= -i= �S'm Lc c�..0>, >% y•) y Q iC (A C y C c y C p) C fA m of O 7 O y E m O rn m C1 N' L tq '� C E c p p C O p) C O N L 'O O C7 O r+ cc as C as O. U 5; EO V .. fl' c y EOas._._ c ,., O (a m c o— to vac p 04- N 2 3 •_ cmca 3p O m 'a E- p 0 0 p 0 d E Ucn p 0 r (�cn0� a) — 0`646 Q C— O — as Q -O —0 0 0 QU) C.0 —0 0= CD Q rn � QLO U— mm g E o o Item H -J88 • • • v 0 ca w= cE rV c o v v v v N Z M M. M M H l0 w 'd C m � d � w d R C O w � ea °a 2> a a a a C 'L O O O o a C a ac a) a 0 O O= O O O o o O CD 0 O w Ld 4) y C P � d U C V 'i= C 0 O d U �LL U U U m U m y a� m m m a a a a a w O 0 0 0 0 U w rn m i> L U L C 0 a3 •— O— — ''•' V C 0 O L r a) - M0),Ca !-' V N C C C C w O-0 'O 0— 0 C 0 0 (a C L p- m ,� C 7 o) p N O f0 O C L L O (D Ol O rO p O L 7 3 '� a) m U :0 a Y p> p O> C ` m O c O O) C O Q D c c0 Ow C O 0� �' t a V a_ ° :a p 0 0 cd O c0 O 0 a 0 > O rA c0 U E C 0 a E p E O a O O v> a) a3 L V 0 L C O t O E_ y C > L O (0 0) o •y U .) L L f0 0 rte.. 0 C O fl O w O cm N w N O V C 0 � 3 a) O O " L E L CL cc a..... CJ C 0 OC Q E p _ U (0 0)y C E S O L 0 CL 2< cM,�°-'0cM -0 :Ec>. ooas -0 nc 0 p _w•o4a='>1 °) 0oas.3ov�>,w --o 0 co a �_ a) L (6 al 0 Ci U) f0 `� (0 U rn > m C C O a) a) �° C n M OL. a 0 U N >, � c a- (0 O c O 0 0 a) 0 O y U Q) E a) O L 0-0 y 0 C C y a) C L O Q L �, to c° c� =.2 0 0 O N w° (�0 7 a) C U C c0 0 N= N tD O M 0 0 E L 0 w° c c0 O a) - O C rn o U C °mo oNy -0 °U -CLL> N LO 0 d C (0 _ �= L- w 0 mL 0 C Cr 3— w°°° =aa�a3 E O p o U o y w ° O E L o m O � c0) Ems.: 3 3� ra�3L ��,� C '0) C C'— p • ��°a°»o3a L o °o O m rD rn�' c c mc�� o�ora)° ° E >;c �" c 0(D 0 3 O m o Q L 0 0 0 � ao a� = L 2 C +' D ;2 V- O °'E °L L tD C'7 rD p tD� O L U M a" c a� �� 3 rnrn cu O) f0 - ao c O) L d o a c L p o o >, 0 o o aw ° C O) a U C. a L W°NocaU;vv,� 0 6 0 o° `' U L a) coO V 0 .. L a� L c L. L- a7 C p_ a3 O C O L M> a) a ca cc E°E� cE0 acaacn�'aco�cav,oEaEGEa,�cn9 00 0>ai aCL °0° � E Item H -J89 co O LO N rn c0 CL m v c 0 1° w— c CLE °v C to ZI J.,r �a 'o c d� =d >o c o° 'a R o� � O 0 r °o. °a a a 2 c a o m L L wo O �- r- o 0 o 0 m m c E.0 i a a a 5 H> m c0 M c 3 +4+ 0 U. m IM U m U CA m c 0 m a a m 0 0 O— O i� O O j C' o> O y G).ft f0 .V . �-- o '0 'o 2== w 3 C c c - c4 R o O 'c 0 n +p+ t cu C cc O C. O E o) p f0 o "' N C OL V w o (cc :� O) C E p O. w E L= 'C =a) 5 W "� L N N C O O c6 �. 7 L C O f` .. w U o O U L CL Gj - O. a y '8 E E O) o D O 'O > Y C .> 0> a U 0 V O C p o p o 0 0 E .. �-�300?MoM ao`�a� o o°�m - N n'o =woW co 3 N 0 0 U 4? o E� co E -0 0 0 o V 0� C O -o 0� p �`� O O� 3: 3 C L ., N w M° ate—cm c t0 •• - — -a 03:E O c 'o N - C U O occc5oC0) r N 'O � p — L mC O_ H >. d ac 3 po0.. M a L Lo,o°v;o03rnocMM o n�°�`o=ff a ->Lo �'m U@cf0U to _ cc p U C ., O fl ooc-o.0 �apo0 C O« L 0 -0 > U O) -p = cna:. o c m N L C >, E O Eo. c .. Z Oco-0>>.ONm��aCL (D Co W�cVoMC >.O�'0�o.° E M7y-° OQ yU c c^ �a o aaCMo 0 0 0 aC o au, •� o _o m o�� ° >;a? -o E c �c c oink °� M;,-- a) c co f'o o-0 OCL >�� c`a > of om— - Em N Eo - Q > L (DNca o c (M� O to CD >, C 'C °��30 O)o0 > .y .O M 75 0) yoo p C C C g E �'E a 0 V p G C C C o CL 0 L o L CC L of �� N ++ c,�a�c ¢mgc_cn�-oEv-a._cdL..catocn��N yo i o .— p .— O Lo�CL N ca >+ rn;t: c'n>, EnE°o� c E c- oa o o M c o c� D c c ��oa30E-6ED2EwEGE • • • • H ea E — mm ^ E N � — Item H -J90 r- 0 co 0 rn cu CL • • Item H -J91 L c 0 CL cE OV V O 10 w Z tt v d v �t H R w 'C C d C 'L d w+ � 0 C O � ca 0.2 d d 2>1 Q Q Q Q Q Q O O O O O O C r- C u N W 00 tq V1 C O U O U O U O U O U O U V = 0) 0) 0) 0) w C c C c C c H>CD p p p p p p C V � C 7 cr 0 m 2 U U U U U cl m c `o c c ag L m m m m ,0 m m = 2M�3„cry O --C w O mw .3 0 N U s 3 Q —O .E o cu (� c �'O �:B �•- U� U = L a' 3 0 Qap'uyi E L ��° 3'c y p ma N� �� _ o C— N- o E U rna�i .0. c >+ -a) O) c 0 a L U y + a) O p y O +� U � C a) C a) U L a) d Cu' > C« O O O — O N E C O n mU rn - �, y ° a.. -a °any ` .o a cu<"a o c yv 0)0) o -o L fn m O W= a) N O .y W m 0 `-' (� 3 y. w E in � O u- a) U C- 3 > L '°2:5 y 0 O '3 y y y y — C a) w O w W .3 a) t o N L ° C C° C C. N i C a 3 a) .y O L L i^ E �, �- '3- C O � .0 N L O U-0.2 •- C [v >+ U y a) 3 N— -aE'oc fv N c°E N m 0 L =U-=0 = C O a) O L U1 E U°°oo C c t C -3L 0a' U c� o c y°° y o y° o �a v > L a E c E _:° Q. Z CD C 0 a)° y ° 3 = U� y N O O cca D '�>+y = M 0 0 c y 'a H p �m m m w M a� ° a� o� o� = 0 Ew 3 a �, ° ami C cc E a0) ° o ;v 7 V rnU acv C 'C ° ° Q C U C C a) y o to y U� - E� rn Y a) c w V g " U O y = vi w y Q M C7 (D N N L _C 3= U 3 fv O O a� O C. a) w ° cv O L N1 o c c «, a) U` :a U C m=_ 3 Q j= w -.. M N c — c6 3 t c m c L C. cv 0 ° _cacti; -O L E y y a) O �p> U U O O U 3 O 4 O M ° 0 M 0 C C C y E w .� O to y y fv U V ` ° V N .O 'O o 0 O E U C .- y _ O. N y, y y .`- y y a) = O Y to O 0.5 c Eo = ° ami o _� W .c U_ °� yc'v ° ° ° c E y aS my 11 m0 > > U C7 3d a� Uco � c aa) I� H � ��� cc`v � � aEi c=v ��� F -r IM Eo M Item H -J91 m v c c £ V co MZq q N N H eo 'o c c�_ m >C c o° t •� m g>Q Q Q U U 0 0 0 c V U V C 462 (�!) c N N C O c O ++c U U � U U V C w C c C C C c H > 0 0 0 C V L C 3 .0 E cr O m Ii U U U Q Q `O n, 00 CL m m m m m OC � m 0 L O " a) c L O () a) to '0 >+o L N O C -p c M-0 c C� 0 O 0) Gl C N rn C p) p p a) O C O .+ a +- — D i (0 C O M p a) N C C V O �° l4 �o �� t c�oo-a•=n >,E =:ate Lc°�r �c�o c �� N a w N N w moo. U �, E a� w y v) c m 0) 0.0) cap O ca 0 wo � `�c�u��,=� o m c o N Oca O� m� �' M o) rn c Uo Cl d > aoi C `O>'i� c � ci m "' y Cc a) E °) E�Ncc0 x aci ca � � ns a � c ° m G Cc L 3" o m C v oCD W m p L cow. v�y4) O a) M ..:- mo -O C a) :M: N a��v,o°a� C r� V «. •mow N '0 O t O a) C p) C �� _ > M N D Li .�. C m E O 0 5 C P C M L C c O a) c4 Z - O y as .. a) O O Cl C p p er d] d L m y 0. C a7 G O c 0 0) C as *O C y -p 3 a) C L 'v C 'O ai N .. c > d C1 +. O L C t0 5 p o v� m a� c °— .3 0)M c c c �• d m� m .. o —U� ` T (D o c a) a w m � °) — O E �O ^ — �' v ca cc c .a m m a O m -6 'o m a) U E � aJ m a o. o '0 a) � � —: :g — :° a) � D a) C c6 d C .0�+ m L 0 0 ? 7 N 0 7 C U p) O E C `C D' t0 L J rn >+ M C J O d a) C m m m Q M 0 i 'O a) c p O i. O cc O •� V N r O 0+-• �Qoa�U��v�c��Uc�£Eom90 C p .d 3� . . . . . . . aw 02CL c p.-. ^ N ^ M an(p J r Item H -J92 :7 l� u U m L O c E OV V 1 N Z N N N H A w 'G c LD m 'L w d R >0 U c 0° 1 R o w �> a a C c = c0 c3 M w O a a C i IM 0 0 0 N > > F- C V � c cr 0 O C U U �U. a m m m c `o c c Q..E �w U m m c C � O C M S a a O ui C C C m o t C 0 N U O co t an d t.V-_ m fD cc C C U 3 V- "° ' ui cOi� c N o j m� c o d)-a� oma 0 M a��i E �'(D0J M o 3c3 c5 U-=�w ° yao E aa4° ° _ c C ` ID x_ a? a_4) 0 cc a�E m � �a) 0) a) EaE�0e oc ca w ° °a� oCc .O acdO ��c, tc` cco ° � 00 c c° 0 M �� n(7V U -- c m NaUE O -a) cu U Zo ,+ ?� 0 ami � a) 0) c ». 0 p O L) �� a� � W� M� E (L o� O c 3 ° '� ° 2 ° `�' 3 a� n a�.5 c oma. o ° - - CQ a o a�� °-w 3 N w °? �� co °� �° m ccv °a °t �' C mrn-0 ID oU m co° ° ca ��cc C .0 003 �3 03:20 a O o�� u, .Q` �� Umu� O HQ 0 O �? M aM c E c -•� C c� j a�,co C p ao c6 0 w c N 3 0_ M Moo w Cw o o E -° C U U 0 aUi O a p E O= O p C c c E .. C w y = p 0 cc° — 3 .c ..� ��Moo �;v yo'CC—U o L' °.,a.-`� Umc��m'xwo� -oar ods wr E ,C • • • (DE��a� O X L E v o mai o C QJ ` O p C p a C U M w CL a.�m am E ¢.5 0 CL c E Item H -J93 m c w c E 00 c ) Z O U) N N N N N la 'C c som >G C t w «' L U U U U w M M c a a a w C w o C V m y d cr > > > L F > Ic C V c 0 7 0cr U U U U U. m m m m d n, `o 0 �o m m m m ESo°u;�O�c`toaYc� - %MDorn ., cco�UN N O0. 'O� i -� a) .O O 3 E WO - CoN >% 0O..:O— 0 C N '6:5 v N 0 0�NON N C O NNV OO � C cv MLOCE EE d—•0 >= L L . O 'L N L V N N N G) O N ,.- d O O E 7— O O fII ° 0)0)4) (D O O X.9 � V cam M L° >O o O 0 N a m '�O E c0 a vim �a a� O .0c�°a.. c o� caEo° E'toL° E—ca °rnc�co —L O N O E O m N t0 CL G O a (� d 3 w N V V N 'O O L C LC. O C C OM��M M L L O. Lw O O C(� O f` C. V.O ° L N O N _ °-L 'O N C O.+ O N w O L J U s °— E -0 O w LO O 'O m L E 2 0 C N y '0 w— -0 N `� . L O E— N m 0 "" C L L O N Crn C c�ON°�,acCE0 a?E �.. rn �_ ."0 o �i�a�rn NE.E (D0 cc °aEcEc>,�cL-a�oa°ic` c�°o o'-°°° M- �2�>, �x N �o�E>,3 Z ° U a U 'C O >, L `L' p 0 4) U 3 E a N N p :: O cc 'O -0 E >' N O ,�c cth=tE.a acOua 20 LM— c Naini �. m �"+aci o.� moo-° Gf 0 0 0 3 (O C D O C y N L C N 'E N 3 N m O C L c E O C �VO��N�°UCLN-O °Oyt 000.°° d y' d��M OCinL OCCL °O Q w .. N ..c—c�a c��'03 v >oN E (D Dov _LtM M m d U c d C O 3 O +- CM v 0+ 'L O O O °. N O. E U— O N M co '- a+ N w c+ -C N N° .. C_ 7 N m O y> N m V O N L C C d> C m 0 0 0 O= 0 0 �.- X O cC C om. O L O N 1) QO 0 0 w- N L m N 0 c0 O L .. O L L E E mow` E o mcn E a� m c.ow ca Q. O N N o H�.dN ° ° ca co and CL --v n o " Item H -J94 M V- 0 O r N rn CL U f U • m v c 0a w= c CLE 00 Ui Z N N �F N m •a 'c m, .m d co >® C o° •a co o w M a 2> a a a 0 w0 cCL w o °- c c O'a Co O O 0 0 = w. N LD C C F- > Q Q C V i c 7 ,+0+ c Q Q m U. U m U m U U m CAc c c 0 0 CL g N ` w m m m m a) p C O fA a) a) d c C L a3 C O O L C �. "" •' C O) � ° W O 0 O C C c a) 0 E c 'C c - m d M U 3 7 cu y C C V 5 O Q V w E cl o o � a) W` C C a) .a C m a) fB U 3 Q O O a3 ;� a) 3,; a .. a d a O 0 Q a) 'C '> 3 0 C c 0 c °.na o f y— a� E O O U r 0= m M Z oaZ O E a� E Y L a�N y `~ 0 a>1M ) N >c o m� y o ami N~cc cU CD rn= �'° ° N a-� c �� � E�'3 o u3 � o c a� °� ��°t c o ° 'p U U N O M a) M L 0 0 �� cc O ca >+ E O N �- 7 cB — M cc � a ton a) O N fn `� 3 '� RS " a) M L C C °) co a Z y C O to m p (n C O -O O C O E o �$ qac E 3 �� y -Lu) E ° c� y 0 °�9 co O o a� ° c co c ca �� �r c c 'c C. w w O . C'1 cC ° 3 O N° ° c a) c O w :. O cv fC a) U :� ,.- ° c c� a� as m c (n a = O 'o Cc p Z °� O L rn N w c fII�=L c N V C=> w L O co c` N 3 c` °� E 2 ° c m�.'E ° ca a) ° bi C° o ° ° EU cv c` u3i °'N flU —� 7 3 m 3 0 X- C 0 L cca c a -in c Z a) o N cv —� c W c N �, -0 o L M U o `O a) WQ O N O C C a) ,� c°i > T 0 3 U ; 0 0 3 (n O L M O a) o o j N m of U O C �;c.r E y �QLO �a °..Z ° C— OW f3mW U'�(n c V E'° Q) a� E a� ^c 3 ao 0'o�'�a E-° vii mN .. U) 0) cam a) °w_Q 3 a� = �t a� a ai °' 0 3 ` a•°i ° �L ° 3 Q L Ocadc2�'x�M3oc cat °� 0L aa) 0cEca -cUZ c33a� `m `� c�>°�,�> °' E._ ui ° aa2�m o m� 3 d a) a)...._SaE n EZ (ate L c o ° o ° °�a ct ° a� c E d a— oQC�.�m`.—... U.° Ow. o x a� ° c o a� U a)Q E co t0 m c to � •. Q � CO Ei. .. Item H -J95 v c .9 cCL E 00 v U) Z Q `N t4 w � C m C w df � w m la >G C O w 0. v Q a a 0 0 t5 U 7 16 U N O C c N N a 0 U U O C U C C C ® H > 7 7 O 0 0 A -C C 0 7 C cr� 0 m U U. U U m IM m c 2 `0 n, 00 O CL m � a Oa m ,� U mrssa). 0 c `o 0 o E c Cc c° 0 M Cc> m y6�; o •�s=:. t >...r w. -oN CD -0 N '8 ca cd mv_ t E >,ca :o a — M0 N is co 0 : 0 C >, 0=> 0 O .�, C M O=� O rn U C C > c 6. c X t Q W fa U L •' U 0 O C Y CC ` E a N O p O V `' to II C C O O 'O' O C y N ::. O N U N m t C >, C C^ O m N E C V O O N +� N ca O 0) O m N c- CL N — ca CO -0 y >+ U In m>� o c E j o' N c O O O C N E o c >+ Ems. caia c0 ._>'+ tOif c -0(DL: amNNo •O C ca ;n —CL'6 wNc Vi c= CD D O O O O> ca > W O 0 0 N N L O N ca U .a U U? U C N N °)N 0 3 N E o c > caw N c L �2 ca o"'�� m m (D O E c m O L f6 =>_ w C 3 c Y N N.� O >,ca v� aU c0� p N O V 0 m O j > 'O C d O '� C = N> Q Z LtM '� `� ui �L O > COLO V_a� axi ° O O� d C O w ` 00 c O o f ccs U.r =O N cam3 N mov�ui 0 c,_� (D O O m two c E:: -o -ac�`` t°N�oa 7 V L G7 E 'O m C' w C N O a d >+ U) >� m N C O^ N c C Y M ca m O O .. m N tAQ d m rn.— m� ca U c� N cc (D -p c >+ U v E m � c N c �� O ` C L c b 0 c m o a07 N °'v oo �--E b 0 = O _ C .O •_ =mr c a� o o_ cv N N > O CL Cc O O w O-0 to m� � d- N Q E m =v m o o c of 3 > C -O a •` c C om •a C 0- 0(D x0 r-0� y N tN 3 N v 7 -p C a w U �ocE�oc0 0occa E�La� -a �."-0_ E�w a� cpm m N oj-- H M =M o: Q 3 m _ o aQ� m m 06 ^ _ ci v Item H -J96 _M v - O N T- 4) rn ca d I� • Item H -J97 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012, Development Review DRC2014-00127, and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126. Public Review Period Closes: September 24, 2014 Project Name: Project Applicant: Commerce Construction Company, LLC Project Location (also see attached map): Located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Project Description: A request to change the land use designation and to modify the Zoning Map from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) and a site plan and architectural review to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6 -acre project site a 139,983 square foot officetwarehouse on a 6.6 acre project site. • FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: • The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. September 24, 2014 Date of Determination Adopted By Item H -J98 i RESOLUTION NO. 14-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A 139,983 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON A 6.6 -ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED SOUTH OF MISSION PARK DRIVE BETWEEN RICHMOND PLACE AND BUFFALO AVENUE WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APNS: 0229-401-06,07,08, AND 09. A. Recitals. 1. Commerce Construction Co., LP filed an application for the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September, 2014 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on September 24, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 6.6 acres of land, basically square in shape and located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (IP); b. The property to the east is developed with industrial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; to the west is a large warehouse distribution building that is partially in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District and partially within the General Industrial (GI) Development District; to the north are industrial buildings within the General Industrial (GI) Development District; and, to the south, are commercial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; C. The amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. With approval of this General Plan Amendment and the related Item H -J99 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-36 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 2 Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-00126) the General Plan and Zoning Map will have the same land use designation; d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element in that the General Industrial (GI) land use designation permits a wide range of industrial activities that include manufacturing and wholesale supply; e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The properties to the north, east and west are developed with similar uses and will not be negatively impacted by the approval of this General Plan Amendment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area. The subject site is accessed by public streets which are designed to accommodate industrial truck traffic and there are other similarly sized buildings in the surrounding area used for wholesale, storage, and distribution. b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. This General Plan Amendment will not negatively impact the environment or the surrounding uses in that the Zoning Map Amendment from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) will not change the size of building permitted on the site, only the use(s) of the building. In the immediate vicinity of the proposed land use change there are other similarly sized buildings and land that is designated General Industrial, thereby providing logical land use compatibility. C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan in that the project site is surrounded by similar industrial uses to the north, east and west and will be compatible with those uses in terms of size, vehicle traffic and design. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record Item H -J100 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-36 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 3 before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of the project site from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) related to the construction of a 139,983 industrial building located on south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue - APN: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09. 2) Approval is contingent on the approval by the City Council of Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-00126) to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Park (GP). 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Item H -J101 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-36 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 4 BY: Ray Wimberly, Chairman. ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on.the .24th day of September 2014, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: . COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item H -J102 RESOLUTION NO. 14-37 ® A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126, A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE ZONING MAP TO CHANGE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A 139,983 SQUARE FOOT OFFICEMAREHOUSE ON A 6.6 -ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED SOUTH OF MISSION PARK DRIVE BETWEEN RICHMOND PLACE AND BUFFALO AVENUE WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APNS: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 AND 09. A. Recitals. 1. Commerce Construction Co., LP filed an application for the approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Zoning Map Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September 2014 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on September 24, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 6.6 acres of land, basically square in shape and located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (IP); b. The property to the east is developed with industrial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; to the west is a large warehouse distribution building that is partially in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District and partially within the General Industrial (GI) Development District; to the north are industrial buildings within the General Industrial (GI) Development District; and, to the south, are commercial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; C. The amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with • related development. With approval of the related General Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00012) the Zoning Map and General Plan will have the same land use designation. Item H -J103 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-37 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 2 d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element in that the General Industrial (GI) land use designation permits a wide range of industrial activities that include manufacturing and wholesale supply; e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The properties to the north, east and west are developed with similar uses and will not be negatively impacted with the Zoning Map Amendment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission herby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (".CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the Item H -J104 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-37, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 3 mitigation measures during project implementation. Tlie Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the application subject to each and every condition set forth. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a Zoning Map Amendment to change the land use designation of the project site from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) related to the construction of a 139,983 square foot industrial building located on south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09. 2) Approval is contingent on the approval by the City Council of General Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00012) to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Park (GP). 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M ® ATTEST: Ray Wimberly, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary Item H -J105 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-37 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 -COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION. CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 4 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City.of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2014, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item H -J106 RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127, A SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 139,983 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON A 6.6 -ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED SOUTH OF MISSION PARK DRIVE BETWEEN RICHMOND PLACE AND BUFFALO AVENUE WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNS: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, AND 09. A. Recitals. 1. Commerce Construction Co., LP filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2014-00127 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September 2014 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on September 24, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; and and b. The property is comprised of four (4) parcels with a combined area of 6.6 acres; C. The property is vacant and has been regularly cleared of brush; and d. To the east are industrial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; to the west is a large warehouse distribution building that is partially in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District and partially within the General Industrial (GI) Development District; to the north are industrial buildings within the General Industrial (GI) Development District; and, to the south, are commercial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; and e. The applicant proposes to develop a 139,983 square foot industrial building along ID with 104 passenger vehicle parking spaces and 15 trailer parking spaces; and Item H -A 07 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 2 f. The proposed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for the proposed building is 49 percent, just below the probable FAR of 50 percent; and g. The application contemplates 'Wholesale, storage, and distribution" uses for the proposed site. As defined in Section 17.32.020 of the Development Code, all categories of wholesale, storage, and distribution uses are permitted in the General Industrial (GI) Development District which the site will be in with the approval of the related General Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00012) and Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-00126). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project will be in accord with the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which it is located with the approval of the related General Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00012) and Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-00126) to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Park (GP). b. That the proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. In that the use of the proposed 139,983 square foot industrial building will be permitted within the General Industrial (GI) Development District with the approval of the related General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI). Additionally, there are industrial uses to the north, east and west of the site. C. The proposed development will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code with the related change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI). The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City including building and parking setbacks; average landscape depth; floor area ratio; parking; dock and storage area screening, landscape coverage, site planning, and architecture. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as all activities will take place within an enclosed building and will comply with all related local, State and Federal requirements. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA°) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Item H -J108 I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 3 Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction of a 139,983 square foot industrial building located on south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09. 2) Approval is contingent on the approval by the City Council of General Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00012) and Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-00126) to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Park (GP). 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 4) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. • 5) The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall -mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order Item H -J109 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 4 to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. The maximum height of light standards, including the base, measured from the finished surface is 25 feet.. 6) New walls, including retaining walls, shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the buildings. 7) All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or a similarly dark color. Sliding gates shall include a solid. metal backing and be constructed to withstand the areas high winds. 8) The stone veneer shall be applied with a mortared (grouted) finish around each individual stone. 9) Provide decorative paving at all vehicle entrances behind public right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. The final design of the enhanced pavement including, but not limited to, concrete color and geometric dimensions, shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval. 10) All ground -mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices, etc. shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. 11) All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations generally in front of, and along, the screen walls that enclose the dock areas and not within direct view or line -of -sight of the office comers of each building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4 -foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the buildings. 12) The employee lunch areas shall have overhead trellises with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. 13) All doors (roll -up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent building wall. 14) Outdoor furniture shall be provided in the outdoor employee eating areas. All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc.) shall be permanent, uniform, and of durable materials. Item H -J110 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 5 ® 15) All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. 16) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with CDFW protocols. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. Engineering Services Department 1) Show private storm drains consistently on Site, Grading, and Concept ® Utility plans. 2) Buffalo Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Secondary" improvements, including: a) Protect the existing curb and gutter and curvilinear sidewalk as required. b) Provide street trees and drive approaches per City Standards as required. c) Protect the existing street lights or provide as required. d) Protect or repair existing traffic striping, signage and traffic signal equipment, as required. 3) Richmond Place frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a) Protect the existing curb and gutter and sidewalk, or repair as required. b) Provide street trees and drive approaches as required. c) Protect the existing street lights or provide as required. • d) Protect or repair the existing traffic signing and signage as required. g Item H -J111 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 6 4) Mission Park Drive to be improved to be in accordance with City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a) Protect the existing curb and gutter and sidewalk. b) Provide. street trees. c) Protect the existing street lights or provide along Mission Drive frontage as required. 5) Verify existing access ramps at the southeast comer of Buffalo Avenue and Mission Park Drive and at the southwest comer of Richmond Place and Mission Park Drive for conformance to ADA requirements and to City Std. 102. Otherwise, reconstruct access ramps to current City Std. 100-B and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA Solutions, Inc. or approved equal. 6) The development is within the Industrial Area Assessment District AD 82-1 and therefore no drainage fees shall be required. 7) Revise Drawing Number 1873-D Sheet 3 to show private storm drain connection. Building and Safety Services Department Grading Special Conditions 1) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 2) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to the Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 3) Verify existing access ramps at the southeast comer of Buffalo Avenue and Mission Park Drive and at the southwest comer of Richmond Place and Mission Park Drive for conformance to ADA requirements and to City Std. 102. Otherwise, reconstruct access ramps to current City Std. 100-B and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA Solutions, Inc. or approved equal. Item H -J112 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 7 Water Quality Management Plan 1) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality Short Term (Construction) Emissions 1) The project shall implement Mitigation Measures MM AQ -1 and MM AQ -2 for the reduction of VOC emissions below SCAQMD Regional Threshold levels as follows: Only "Zero -Volatile Organic Compounds" paints (no more than 150 gram/liter of VOC) and/or High Pressure Low Volume (HPLV) applications consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113 shall be used. • During construction activity, all construction equipment (equal to or greater than 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 3 Certified or better. Additionally, during grading activity, total horsepower -hours per day for all equipment shall not exceed 18,088 horsepower -hours per day and the maximum disturbance (actively graded) area shall not exceed 5 acres per day. 2) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low -emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 4) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards • noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. Item H -J113 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 8 5) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 6). All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading. operations during high winds (i.e:, wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 7) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 8) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 9) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel -powered equipment where feasible. 10) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Item H -J114 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 9 is Lona Term Emissions 11) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 12) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 13) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 14) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 15) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 16) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 17) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC -03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. is 18) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 19) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 20) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 21) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. Biological Resources 1) A 30 -day pre -construction burrowing owl survey is required prior to approval of a rough Grading Permit. Cultural Resources • 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect Item H -J115 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 10 or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Item H -J 116 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 18 Page 11 • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the. site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall • be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil - stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline - or diesel -powered engines where feasible. • Item H -J117 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127- COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 12 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 7) Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. 8) Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 9) Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, use daylight as an integral part of the lighting systems in buildings. 10) Install light-colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. 11) Install energy-efficient heating and cooling systems, appliances and equipment and control systems. 12) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 13) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. Item H -J118 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 13 •14) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 15) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. • Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel • dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. Item H -J119 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 14 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by PBLA Engineering (May, 20, 2014) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading Activities 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit.- Noise ermit. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Item H -J120 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 15 •Building Official. Said consultant; shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter screen wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent. feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Transportation/Traffic 1) Implement the site access improvement outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the project (Urban Crossroads, April 2014) and described in Section 1.6.1 (Site Access Improvements) and on • Exhibit 1 — 3 (On -Site Access and Circulation Recommendations) of the analysis. is 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Ray Wimberly, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2014, by the following vote -to -wit: Item H -J121 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 16 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item H -J122 Conditions of Approval •nMoi cs Community Development Department Project #: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY Tn vnim van_i'cr_r- A. Planning Department 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 2. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the ,applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Manager prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 3. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on- and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 2,206.25 5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. • Printed: 9/1/2014 www.CityofRC.us Item H -J123 Project #. DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOW/NG'CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. ROJECT. A. Plannina Dwartrnent 6. Copies of the signed Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 8. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 9. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 10. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 11. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 12. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all .trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 13. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of:way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 14. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 15. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 16. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 17. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. www.QtyafRC.us Page 2 of 29 Printed: 9/2/2014 Item H -J124 Project #: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF • Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 1. Mission -Park Drive to be improved to be in accordance with City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk. b. Provide street trees. c. Protect existing street lights or provide along Mission Drive frontage, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping and signage, as required. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Buffalo Avenue Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Mission Park Drive • Street Lights Street Trees • 4. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD -1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD -2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 5. The development is within the Industrial Area Assessment District AD 82-1 and therefore no drainage fees shall be required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Printed: 9/22014 WWW.CityotRC.us Item H -J125 Page 3 of 29 Project* DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR. CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOIMNG CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- S. ROJECT. S. En4ineerina Services Department 8. Install. street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1).2 Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name - Buffalo Avenue Botanical Name - Pinus canariensis Common Name - Canary Island Pine Min. Grow Space - T Spacing - 35' O.C. Size - 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 9. Intersection -line of sight designs .shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall bei filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 12. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. www.0tyofRC.US Page 4 of 29 Printed: 9/2/2014 Item H -J126 Project #: Project Name: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF • Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan:Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Ennineerin4 Services Department 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: •1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. • 14. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 15. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 16. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits. Printed: 9/2/2014 www.QtyofRc.us Item H -J127 Page 5 of 29 Project # DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. ROJECT. B. Enaineerina Services Deuarbnent 17. Richmond Place frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk, or repair, as required. b. Provide street.trees and drive approaches, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic signing and signage, as required. 18. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Richmond Place Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 20. Street Name - Richmond Place Botanical Name - Brachychiton populneus Common Name - Bottle Tree Min. Grow Space - 6' Spacing - 35'0.C. Size - 15 gallon 21. Street Name - Mission Park Drive Botanical Name - Magnolia grandiflora "St. Mary" Common Name - NCN Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20'0.C. Size - 15 gallon 22. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except:.. that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 29 Printed: 9/2/2014 Item H -J128 Project #: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,: LP FOR CSF •Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT -- B. Engineering Services Department 23. Revise Drawing Number 1873-D Sheet 3 to show private storm drain connection. 24. Buffalo Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Secondary" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and curvilinear sidewalk, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches per City Standards, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping, signage and traffic signal equipment, as required. e. Provide a signing and striping plan for Buffalo Avenue. 25. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. E. Grading Section 1. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorders Office. 3. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 4. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Buffalo Avenue, Richmond Place and Mission Park Drive) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department 5. Planting in the infiltration basins shall meeting the requirements of the Water Quality Management Plan Technical Guidance Document and the required infiltration report shall include a reduction in the infiltration rate due to the proposed landscaping and river rock cobble. 6. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. • Printed: 9/22014 www.0tyofRC.us Page 7 of 29 Item H -J129 Project # DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 7. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan has been deemed "Acceptable'.. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. A. Plannina Department 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 2. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Manager prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 3. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on- and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 50 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will. confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 2,206.25 5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his agents, officers, or employees, because of the relinquish such approval. The applicant shall for any Court costs and attorney's fees which required by a court to pay as a result of such at its own expense in the defense of any such of his obligations under this condition. sole expense any action brought against the. City, its issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate action but such participation shall not relieve applicant WWW.CityOfRC US Page 8 of 29 Printed: 9/2/2014 Item H -J130 Project #: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANYJLP FOR CSF is Location: - 022940106-0000 j Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan' Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 6. Copies of the signed Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 8. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 9. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 10. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 11. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval in accordance with •the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 12. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 13. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 14. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 15. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 16. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 17. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. eDetails shall be included in building plans. Printed: 9/2/2014 www.C1yofRC.us Page 9 of 29 Item H -J131 Project # DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. ROJECT. B. Enaineerina Services Department 1. Mission Park Drive to be improved to be in accordance with City "Industrial Local° improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk. b_ Provide street trees. c. Protect existing street lights or provide along Mission Drive frontage, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping and signage, as required. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Buffalo Avenue Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Mission Park Drive Street Lights Street Trees 4. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD -1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD -2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 5. The development is within the Industrial Area Assessment District AD 82-1 and therefore no drainage fees shall be required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 29 Printed: 9!2/2014 Item H -J132 Project #: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC201+00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF ® Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 8. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1).° Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name - Buffalo Avenue Botanical Name - Pinus canariensis Common Name - Canary Island Pine Min. Grow Space - T Spacing - 35' O.C. Size - 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. •2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 9. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. • 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 12. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final Permit issuance if no map is involved. estimated operating costs for all map approval or prior to Building Printed: 9/2/2014 www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 29 Item H -J133 Project # ORC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. En4ineerina Services Department 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 15. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and' the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 16. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits. www.cityofRc.us Page 12 of 29 Printed: 9/2/2014 Item H -J134 Project #: Project Name: Iftocation: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 17. Richmond Place frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk, or repair, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic signing and signage, as required. 18. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Richmond Place Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees &P0. Street Name - Richmond Place Botanical Name - Brachychiton populneus Common Name - Bottle Tree Min. Grow Space - 6' Spacing - 35'0.C. Size - 15 gallon 21. Street Name - Mission Park Drive Botanical Name - Magnolia grandiflora "St. Mary" Common Name - NCN Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20'0.C. Size - 15 gallon 22. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.C1tyofRC.us 9!2!2014 www.Page 13 of 29 Item H -J135 Project it DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 23. Revise Drawing Number 1873-D Sheet 3 to show private storm drain connection. 24. Buffalo Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Secondary" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and curvilinear sidewalk, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches per City Standards, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping, signage and traffic signal equipment, as required. e. Provide a signing and striping plan for Buffalo Avenue. 25. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the -public right-ofway, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. E. Grading Section 1. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit 2. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 3. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 4. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Buffalo Avenue, Richmond Place and Mission Park Drive) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 5. Planting in the infiltration basins shall meeting the requirements of the Water Quality Management Plan Technical Guidance Document and the required infiltration report shall include a reduction in the infiltration rate due to the proposed landscaping and river rock cobble. 6. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CCSR's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 29 Printed: 9/22014 Item H -J136 Project #: Project Name: abLocation: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., E. Gradina Section 7. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. A. Planning Department 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant , is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 2. In those instances. requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Manager prior to 18issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. • 3. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on- and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 2,206.25 5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 9/2/2014 Item H -J137 Page 15 of 29 Project #: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF _ Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEO.A Review; General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Plannina Department 6. Copies of the signed Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 8. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 9. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 10. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 11. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 12. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 13. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 14. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 15. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 16. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 17. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building.. Details shall be included in building plans. www.0tyofRC.uS Page 16 of 29 Printed: 9122014 Item H -J138 Project #: Project Name: ® Location: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 1. Mission Park Drive to be improved to be in accordance with City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk. . b. Provide street trees. c. Protect existing street lights or provide along Mission Drive frontage, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping and signage, as required. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Buffalo Avenue Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Mission Park Drive ® Street Lights Street Trees is 4. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD -1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD -2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 5. The development is within the Industrial Area Assessment District AD 82-1 and therefore no drainage fees shall be required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Printed: 9/2/2014 vAvw.cityofRC.us Item H -J139 Page 17 of 29 Project # DRC201.4-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 8. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name - Buffalo Avenue Botanical Name - Pinus canariensis Common Name - Canary Island Pine Min. Grow Space- 7' Spacing - 35' O.C. Size - 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 9. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways, Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation -costs shall be bome by the developer. 11. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 12. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. Printed: 9/2/2014 www.CityofRC.us Item H -J140 Page 18 of 29 Project #: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF • Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street . trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 15. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 16. The separate parcels contained within the project. boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits. • Printed: 9/2/2014 www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 29 Item H -J141 Project #: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. ROJECT. B. Enaineerina Services Department 17. Richmond Place frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk, or repair, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic signing and signage, as required. 18. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Richmond Place Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 20. Street Name - Richmond Place Botanical Name - Brachychiton populneus Common Name - Bottle Tree - Min. Grow Space - 6' Spacing - 360.C. Size - 15 gallon 21. Street Name - Mission Park Drive Botanical Name - Magnolia grandiflora "St. Mary" Common Name - NCN Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Size - 15 gallon 22. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or . structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in . developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. W W W.CIi)IOfliC.US page 20, of 29 Printed: 9/2/2014 Item H -J142 Project #: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF ® Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Enaineerin4 Services Department 23. Revise Drawing Number 1873-D Sheet 3 to show private storm drain connection. 24. Buffalo Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Secondary" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and curvilinear sidewalk, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches per City Standards, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping, signage and traffic signal equipment, as required. e. Provide a signing and striping plan for Buffalo Avenue. 25. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. E. Gradina Section •1. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. • 2. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 3. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 4. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Buffalo Avenue, Richmond Place and Mission Park Drive) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 5. Planting in the infiltration basins shall meeting the requirements of the Water Quality Management Plan Technical Guidance Document and the required infiltration report shall include a reduction in the infiltration rate due to the proposed landscaping and river rock cobble. 6. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CCBR's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. Printed: 9/22014 www.CityofRC.us Item H -J143 Page 21 of 29 Project # DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- E. ROJECT. E. Grading Section 7. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. A. Planning Department 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of. $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 2. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Manager prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 3. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on- and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below.. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 2,206.25 5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees, may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. www.CityofRC.US Page 22 of 29 Printed: 9/2/2014 Item H -J144 Project #: Project Name: • Location: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,: LP FOR CSF - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 6. Copies of the signed Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 8. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 9. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 10. Textured . pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 11. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval in accordance with • the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 12. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 13. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 14. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 15. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 16. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 17. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically. more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. • Details shall be included in building plans. Printed: 9/2/2014 www.CityofRC.us Page 23 of 29 Item H -J145 Project #: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Ennineerina Services Department 1. Mission Park Drive to be improved to be in accordance with City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk b. Provide street trees. c. Protect existing street lights or provide along Mission Drive frontage, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping and signage, as required. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Buffalo Avenue Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Mission Park Drive Street Lights Street Trees 4. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. ' Form CD -1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD -2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department withinZ0 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 5. The development is within the Industrial Area Assessment District AD 82-1 and therefore no drainage fees shall be required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. www.CityofRC.us Prirrted: 9/2/2014 Page 24 of 29 Item H -J146 Project#: DRC2014-00127CEQA2014-00005, DRC201i4-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF • Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan'Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO .YOUR PROJECT.- B. ROJECT. B. Enaineerina Services Department 8. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name - Buffalo Avenue Botanical Name - Pinus canariensis Common Name - Canary Island Pine Min. Grow Space - 7' Spacing - 35' O.C. Size - 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be ftfmished to the .2) City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 9. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 12. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. Printed: 9/2/2014 www.cityofRc.us Page 25 of 29 Item H -J147 Project #: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. ROJECT. B. Engineering Services Deuartment 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 15. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 16. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits. www.CityofRC.us Page 26 of 29 Printed: 9/2/2014 Item H -J148 Project #: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF •Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. ROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 17. Richmond Place frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk, or repair, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic signing and signage, as required. 18. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Richmond Place Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees •20. Street Name - Richmond Place Botanical Name - Brachychiton populneus Common Name - Bottle Tree Min. Grow Space - 6' Spacing - 35' O.C. Size -15 gallon 21. Street Name - Mission Park Drive Botanical Name - Magnolia grandiflora "St. Mary" Common Name - NCN Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20'0.C. Size - 15 gallon 22. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the •property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed: 9/22014 www.CityofRC.us Page 27 of 29 Item H -J149 Project #: Project Name: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. ROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 23. Revise Drawing Number 1873-D Sheet 3 to show private storm drain connection. 24. Buffalo Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Secondary" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and curvilinear sidewalk, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches per City Standards, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping, signage and traffic signal equipment, as required. e. Provide a signing and striping plan for Buffalo Avenue. 25. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way,. including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. E. Grading Section 1. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 3. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 4. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Buffalo Avenue, Richmond Place and Mission Park Drive) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department 5. Planting in the infiltration basins shall meeting the requirements of the Water Quality Management Plan Technical Guidance Document and the required infiltration report shall include a reduction in the infiltration rate due to the proposed landscaping and river rock cobble. 6. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. Printed: 9/2/2014 www.CityofRC.us Item H -J150 Page 28 of 29 C Project #: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00016 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 7. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. Printed: 9/2/2014 www.CityofRC. us Item H -J151 Page 29 of 29 STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: September 24, 2014 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (MODIFICATION) - DRC2014-00774 - SSRB GROUP, INC. - A request to modify an approved Conditional Use Permit (DRC2012-00057) to increase the hours of operation in order to open earlier for an existing restaurant and bar (Sixty6 Sports Lounge) located at the southeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue within the Specialty Commercial (SC) Development District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, Suite K1.. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit (Modification) DRC2014-00774, to extend the hours of operation of an existing restaurant and bar and schedule a 6 month review of the business operation to address concerns raised by the Police Department, through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single -Family Residential/ Offices - Low -Medium Residential/Office South - Commercial strip center and gas station — Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 2) East - Shopping Center - Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 2) West - Shopping Center - Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 2) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site — General Commercial North - Office, Low -Medium South - Community Commercial East - General Commercial West - General Commercial C. Proiect Background: The Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 and Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00057 on July 12, 2012 to operate a restaurant and bar with live entertainment. The business operation is a restaurant with a Type 47 alcohol license which permits full service of beer, wine and distilled spirits for on- site consumption. The restaurant is required to operate as a "bona fide eating place" as defined in the California Business and Professions Code Section 23028. The approved hours of operation are Sundays through Thursday from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and • Friday and Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. The applicant is requesting to change the hours and open at 9:00 a.m., seven days a week. Per Development Code Section 17.16.120 and per the Conditions of Approval established for the original application Item K-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00774 — SSRB GROUP, INC. SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 2 DRC2012-00057 (Exhibit A), a Conditional Use Permit Modification is required before the change can occur. D. Site Characteristics: The existing restaurant and bar is located within the Thomas Winery Plaza in an historic winery building. The subject tenant space comprises a total of 7,597 square foot (5,778 square foot interior space), which includes two patio areas. The applicant is not proposing any site or floor plan changes. E. Parking Calculations: The site is adequately parked for the proposed use. The expanded hours do not require any additional parking spaces. Type of Use Restaurant with Bar and outdoor patios ANALYSIS: Square Parking Footage Ratio 7,597 1:100 Number of Number of Spaces Spaces Required Provided 76 76 A. Proiect Proposal: The applicant is requesting to expand the hours of operation in order to open at 9:00 a.m., seven day a week. The earlier opening time is being requested to attract patrons to sporting events with early broadcast times. No changes are being requested to the closing time or the times when entertainment is permitted. The new requested hours of operation would be as follows: Friday and Saturday: 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Sundays through Thursday: 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. The Development Code Section 17.16.120 requires the following findings for the approval of a Conditional Use Permit: 1. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. 2. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. 3. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The Development Code Section 17.14.100 (Modification), states that to modify an existing permit that "A permit modification may be granted only when the approving authority makes all findings required for the original approval." The Resolution approving the original approval has been attached as Exhibit A and the draft resolution contains facts to support the required findings for the requested modification. Item K-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00774 — SSRB GROUP, INC. ® SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 3 B. Public Safety: Staff met with the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department (RCPD) to discuss Sixty6 Sports Lounge's current operation on September 3, 2014 and intended change of hours. At the meeting, the RCPD raised concerns regarding violations of the approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and the excessive number of police calls -for - service to the subject location. The RCPD recommended that the applicant's request for additional hours of operation not be granted until they were able to comply with the Conditions of Approval and there was a reduction in the calls -for -service. The CUP violations identified by the Police Department include having outside speakers, flashing lights, doors open during entertainment, improper number of security guards and not using the required ID scanner on entertainment nights. Two special events were held without the required Temporary Use Permit. Exhibit B outlines the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department calls for service and Exhibit C specifically notes violations of the Conditional Use Permit as identified by the Police Department A.C.T. Team. Staff has included a condition in the Resolution of Approval requiring a progress review within the next 6 months to ensure that the applicant successfully addresses these recent violations and adheres to the Conditions of Approval, C. Compatibility of Use: The proposed expansion of the hours of operation should not affect the surrounding business as the activities will take place entirely within the building and there is adequate parking. D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section15301 - Existing Facilities. Because the project only involves expanding the hours of operation to open earlier, staff concludes that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. No correspondence or phone calls have been received with respect to the application requests. Respectfully submitted, Je rey A. Bloom DCM Economic and Community Development • JAB:TV/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Staff Report and Resolution of Approval for DRC2012-00057 dated July 11, 2012 (with attachments) Item K-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00774 — SSRB GROUP, INC. SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 4 Exhibit B - List of RCPD Calls -for -Service Exhibit C - Conditional Use Permit Violations Exhibit D - Applicant Letter of Request Exhibit E - Letter from Thomas Winery Plaza Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit (Modification) DRC2014-00774 Item K-4 1' STS REPORT PLANNING DEPARTtiIENT. DATE: July 1 t, 2012 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission UVCAMONGA FROM: Jeffrey A. Bloom., Interim Planning Director BY Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: NON CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT - DRC2012-00057 - THOMAS WINERY PLAZA - SSB PARTNERS INC. - A request to operate a full. service restaurant and bar with outdoor eating areas and entertainment within a historic building at the Thomas Winery Plaza located in: Subarea 2 of the Specialty. Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard. District at 8916 Foothill. Boulevard — APN- 0208-101-23. Related Files: Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 and: Minor Development Review DRC2012-00696: This action is categorically exempt from the California. Environmental Quality: Act_ (CEQA) pursuant. to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities.. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT - DRC2012-00058 - SSB PARTNERS INC. - A request to provide live entertainment such as a disc jockey, bands and dancing at a full service restaurant and bar with outdoor dining in the Thomas.'UVinery Plaza located in Subarea 2 of the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard — APN* 0208-101-23, Related Files. Non Construction Conditional Use Permit. DRC2012-00057 and Minor Development • Review DRC2012-00698: This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301:; existing. facilities: MINOR D.EVELOMENT REVIEW - DRC2012-00696: - SSB PARTNERS INC: - A request to construct- a second outdoor eating area that is 1,093 square feet located orr the north side of the building at a proposed restaurant and bar in the Thomas Winery Plaza in the Specialty Commercial District. of the Foothill Boulevard. District (Subarea 2) at 89:16 Foothill Boulevard. APN: 0208-101-23. Related Files: Non Construction Conditional Use Permit, ORC2012-00057 and Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the. Planning Commission approve Non Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057, Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 and Minot Development. Review DRC2012-00696 through the: adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions:. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION - A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single -Family Residential/ Offices- Low -Medium Residential/Office South Commercial strip center and. gas station — Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard. District, Subarea 2) East - Shopping Center- Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District.. Subarea 2) • West. - Shopping. Center - Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 2) EXHIBIT A Item K-5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.REPORT DRC20U-00057, DRC2012-00058 and DRC2092-00696;— SSB PARTNERS INC.. July 11, 2012 Page 2 B. General Plan Designations Project Site — General Commercial North Office,. Low -Medium South - Community Commercial. East - General Commercial West: - General Commercial C. Site Characteristics: The proposed applications are for a restaurant and sports bar .with outdoor dining and ancillary entertainment in an existing historic winery building located within the Thomas Winery Plaza (Exhibit A):. The subject tenant space with the two patios comprises a• total of 7,597 square feet The site is currently improved with landscaping., lighting, and parking areas. D Parkinq Calculations: The center has obtained approval of Minor Exception 0RC2012- 00536 on June 19,. 2012, to reduce the required parking for the Thomas Winery. Plaza by 20 percent. A parking analysis was prepared By Clyde E. Sweet and Associates on May'30, 2012. The report states that at peak demand it is estimated that the Plaza will only utilize 468 of the 511 parking spaces: that are currently located on the site. The table below indicates what the require parking will be for the restaurant and bar Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces. Spaces: Type of Use Foota e. Ratio Required Provided .Restaurant with Bar 7,587' 1:100 76 76 and outdoor patios ANALYSIS": A. Background: The existing: building was previously occupied by Bobby Baja's Restaurant and bar. Bobby Baja's closed in 2008 and was subsequently leased to SSB Partners Inc after which. they submitted the. applications under review. The new restaurant and bar has not been named as of the time of this report B. General: The restaurant and: bar will occupy a lease space of -approximately 7,597 square. feet with two outdoor dining areas of approximately 1,819 square feet located at the north and south sides of the. building.. The building occupant load. is 345 with seating for 261 people.. A bar area: of approximately 380 square feet, with 17 bar stools is located in the center of the restaurant. along the north' wall of the seating area. The previous bar was located in the northeast corner of the dining area and was approximately 200 square feet.. A. 166 - square foot raised platform is located on. the west side of the restaurant for all live performances; including bands, disc jockeys and karaoke. A dance floor area of approximately 200 square feet is. located directly in front of the stage: The remainder of the restaurant is dedicated to table seating that can. be removed as necessary depending. upon the type and scale, of event.. There are 16 flat screen televisions located: throughout the restaurant.: The applicant has applied for a Conditional Use Permit in order- to allow a bar use in conjunction with a restaurant, as well as for the applicant to obtain a Type -47 License to serve distilled spirits. Item K-6 PLANNING. COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC20-12.-00057, DRC2012-00058 and DRC2012=00696 — SSB PARTNERS INC: • July 11, 2012 Page 3 In addition to the Conditional Use Permit, the applicant has, applied .for an Entertainment Permit. in order to allow live bands, dancing, a disc jockey and karaoke. The business will primarily operate as a restaurant during the day, and in the evening the restaurant will host a live band performance, while still offering a late night dining menu. The proposed hours of operation for the restaurant and bar are as follows:. Hours of Operation Friday and Saturday: 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Sundays through Thursday: 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m.. The proposed entertainment hours are as follows: Entertainment TvpefHours Monday through Sunday. 9:30 p.m. to close No entertainment will be. provided in the outdoor patios. All entertainment will occur within the building. Live entertainment will be performed after 9'30 PM when the restaurant will be limited to persons 21' years and over. • C. Historic Resources; The. Thomass-wnery building where the restaurant will be located. is a State .and IocaDy designated historic landmark. Historic artifacts such as the stairs. to the upper floor storage area and wine barrel near'the. kitchen are required to be. inventoried by the applicant and' preserved and' maintained in. place, Any change to these items requires a Certificate of Appropriateness to be filed and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. The Historic. Preservation Commission has also. discussed the preservation of a. wine conveyer currently located on the main floor of the building. The Historic Preservation Commission gave. the Planning Director the, authority to move towards a workable solution. Staff has advocated that the artifact be preserved and stored on site in the upper floor storage area.. The new patio does not. require a Certificate of Appropriatenessbecause it will not alter or change the existing historic building. The new patio does not attach to the existing building in any way and utilizes materials that are used on the building and- surrounding structures The existing patio on the south side of the building is proposed to be reconstructed in-kind; therefore., it does not require a Certificate of Appropriateness. This work will be done by the property manager. Previous restaurants were required to include information about the Thomas: Winery and still buildings in their menus. Staff has placed a condition of approval that requires the. applicant to incorporate a short history of the winery building into. the food and drinks menu. D.. Compatibility of Use: The subject applications are a request to operate a restaurant and bar with outdoor dining and include entertainment such as live bands and dancing as is ancillary to the primary use (restaurant). The subject site has a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial, which' the General Plan describes as: "The General Item K-7 PLANNING. COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC201-2-00057, DRC2012-00058 and DRC2012-00696 - SSB PARTNERS INO.. July 1:1., 20:12 Page 4 Commercial designation applies to properties along major activity corridors. This designation provides for a wide range .of community oriented and regional -orientated commercial businesses, including businesses that cater to tourists- traveling on Historic Route 66 (Foothill Bou/eva 4 Staff believes that the applications are consistent with the.. General Plan land :use designation in. that the proposed use will offer entertainment opportunities for: local residents and regional visitors; creating a more vibrant urban space. Because of the uniqueness of the: Thomas Winery Plaza, .in conjunction with adequate on- site, parking to serve the proposed use; staff, believes that the proposed use is in. accordance with the General Plan and the purposes of the district: in which it is located: Together with the conditions applicable. thereto; staff believes that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The. Coffee Klatch which is closest to the restaurant opens as early as 6:30 a.m.. and closes by 9 p.m: so it will not be affected by the use.. E. Security SS® Partners. Inc. has established a. thorough security plan to address potential situations during business operations as well as ensure proper. alcohol service. SSB Partners Inc has provided a copy of their Security Procedures as Exhibit E, which clearly describes the role of their security personnel in dealing with any issues that may arise After 9:34 p.m, security will'be maintained at 1 officer fdveach 75. patrons. The security staff wi1F patrol, both inside and outside. the building: At the. of live events one-half of the. security staff deployed will be stationed outside to assist and ensure patrons leave safety. Random outside patrol checks approximately every half hour will be conducted nightly. The goal of the security staff is to have all patrons out of the building at closing. and out 'of the parking area 15 minutes after closing. In addition to the security provisions proposed by SSB Partners Inc., staff has included a. condition in the resolution that will require an employee who serves alcohol to. obtain a Certificate of Completion for; training in the proper, service of alcohol (I-E.A.D. or equivalent): Also, an additional condition of approval has been included requiring the applicant to cease all. alcohol sales no less tharr thirty (30) minutes before closing, This is to ensure that all patrons will have adequate: time between consuming a drink and teaving the establishment: F. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that.. the project is categorically la empt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing. Facilities) because the project does. not. result in: any major interior or exterior alterations, and: there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Item K-8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2012-00057, DRC2012-00058 and DRC2012-00696— SSB PARTNERS INC'. S July 11, 2012 Page 5 FACTS FOR FINDING: Conditional Use Permit The evidence indicates that: 1. The subject site has a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial. The proposed use is in accordance with General Plan Policy LU -1.3 which encourages commercial centers: to provide a broad. range of retail and service needs for the community. With the addition of the restaurant and par with outdoor dining to the shopping center, the shopping center can expand its services and attract. a wider range of residents; and 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health; safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as. conditions have beert imposed to ensure the proper service of alcohol to patrons, and the building complies with all applicable. Fire and Building Codes; and 3. The proposed use complies with each applicable provision of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code as. the- use. occupies. an existing building that. is in • conformance with the Development Code as it relates- to parking, setbacks, height, etc.,. and sufficient conditions have beeFi imposed .to ensure that the use will comply with the Performance. Standards set forth in Section 17.10.050. of the Development Code and will not. create adverse impacts upon adjacent uses,. Entertainment Permit The evidence indicates that: 1., The conduct of the establishment will not be detrimental to the. public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as conditions have been imposed to require onsite security during the hours of entertainment and: ensure proper service of alcohol to patrons, and the building complies with all applicable Fire and Building Codes; and 2. The premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner as sufficient conditions have been imposed to ensure that security provisions are in place to regulate the conduct of patrons to prevent incidents resulting in calls for service; and 3. The normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding commercial center and adjacent residential development as conditions have been imposed, to ensure that the establishment will comply with the Performance Standards set forth in Section 17.10.05.0 of the. Development Code and will not create adverse impacts upon adjacent uses; and • CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners Item K-9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2012-00057, PRC2012.;00058 and DRC2012-00696— SSB PARTNERS INC. July. 11, 2012 Page & with -in a 660q6ot radius of the project site. No correspondence or phoile calls have been receivedwith respect to the al)Pficatibn requests; Respectfully submitted, -t7z>A4*-=Z, Jeffrey A. Bloom Interim. Planning Director' JAB:SFAs Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Plan Exhibit B, - Floor plan Exhibit C - outdoor Dining Area Elevations, Exhibit D - Business Plan Exhibit E: - Security Procedures Exhibit, F' .6 Menu Exhibit G - Parking Minor Exception for Ra .9 Reduction DRC2012-00636 Draft Resolution . of . Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 Draft Resolution of Approval for Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 Draft Resolution lution of Approval for Minor Development Review DRC2012-006.96' Item K-10 • • 1N3N3AOddl41 1NV.NA 1Nv8nviS38 43SOdO8d. wZbld: k?13NLM SVWOHI Iliiilillilllllfl� �d. W €� 00 I EXHIBIT A 0 T W r M0:LJ a0 3 rT N I A v a 8 V A 3. N iA Item K-11 1� u • 1N3W3AOtJdNl jN.LN3l. iNvan-is38 03sodOdd Vzvld J,83NIM-.: svr;oHL 0 1 PG .5fctff EXHIBIT B do k f .7 i ■. ! �� a. Item K-12 <Z _j Y 0.X �z Li W .-. LLJ < N O©0.. _b F -CL 'll 1N3VUA-0adill 1 NVN31 1NVvviSia Q3SOdOdd VZVld k?13NIM. S-Vrjo.Hl Item K-13 �1 low m r' � k Q Nr � .¢ a- 7 }¢ uj(n WW _K (. :ro W <0 00 �d 0 0 JN3jN3A'd8dR1 L,qVN3.L wo ff. CW' iwanv!Oh� 03SOdO.Nd . � t. . ... I VZY1d- A83NI V V40HI r P1 R; N"Ali W AI Jai ?. c - 5 t. a- Y* //0f" "/// // )- EXHIBIT C Z- 0. P O Item K-14 2Z: N. J. a z 0 2 � SSB Partners,. Inc. dba ABC (For permit basis only) Tapas Restaurant and Sports Bar Business Plan April 2012 Sartaj Singh, Sunil Sethi & Bobby Bedi Tel: (909)941-0047 Email`: anto�v� cdm • Introduction and Overview This.business plan has been prepared to introducenew ABC Restaurant and Sports. Bar, and provide a comprehensive understanding Aerations, its growth strategy and..fmancial objectives necessary. to achieve its plan objectives: ABC will be considered a'Casual:Yet classy. Tapas Sale Restaurant and Sports bar" concept that offers value in its menu pricing and geared. to consumers wh fun alternative to traditional o are looking for a quality, healthy, and food. But unlike typical service restaurants, ABC's product will be. fresher and or relaxed dining, business lunches, or a fun place to take the tastier. The dining room is more comfortable f family and watch all.your favorite sports. The Opportunity Americans' appetite for restaurant food is growing bigger, spending $1 billion a day eating away from home. By 2010, the National Restaurant Association at the nation's 844,000 restaurants than pan on eating. at home:.redicts consumers will spend more move from The nation-wide Quick Service Restaurant. segment is estimated to reach $15 billion by 2010. Restaurant-indorecastustry y �g out advance in 2009 and equal 4% of the U.S. gross domestic product:. Restaurant industry sales are in their 17th 2.5% consecutive year of real growth. The residential population of Rancho Cucamonga is gardens and east of Claremont there is no restaurant tha does: p record number west sent°and! casual f G .sY�.7�-F �f 7�,�Z yet EXHIBIT D Item K-15 claW atmosphere as we are p6nifling. to showcase in - the. city of Rancho CucamongL Funding: Requirements Business model is to rftddeI existing Thomas Winery Building formerly occupied by Bobby Bajas, as such a total investment of in the range of $750,000. to &1000,000 is retluiied.fbr-initial start-up expenses, initial inventory; and workinS.capital. Overview enjoy as tyle food menu, We will enter existing high density market providing a new. and fun Place to 0YTaP S f. m n Full Bar, live entertainment We will also create anew market that will find this. experiewe most enjoyable. We will provide a quality experience both in the form of food and beverage as well as in the form. of serviceand satisfaction. ABC's will. be the, "Gatherffig-place, where everyone has fun."' We will be the restaurant and sports bar of choice for a relaxing meal or the. place to be for the family that.ldves watching sports, having quality meals and erjoyin& music in an environment that appeals to all. ness. venture. will accomplish many This bus�Igoals. We will bring ABC to areas that provide: the best family dinifig experience to the community. We will- help our community and the local economy grow by providing jobs And community involvement We wdil develop relationships with local. law enforcement,. ,y relat ipp paramedics and fire fighters, letting them know that we care and support their efforts. Rind.ra.isers, donations, and the prornoting..of a general well-being are all areas of extreme focus. Corporate Structure SSB Partners, Ideas a. Limited Liability Company registered in the State of California. With.coinbined experience of over 40 years in restaurant and management we are confident about this project. Restaurant Location Being located in a Thomas Winery Plaza is advantageous as it will cream consumer traf5c.. attraction, and joint revenue. In short we'll create- an environment with high amounts Of synergy. . our Location is approximately 6,000 sq ft and will accommodate capacity of aPProximately 200 seats. after remodeling? Ample parking is available within sboppih& cenmrs.. The restaurant will Operate from approximately 11 am to 12 pm. Sunday thru Thursday and from 11' am to 2 am Friday and Saturday. Item K-16 r Product Description ABC will. be a full service restaurant and sports bar geared to. consumers who are looking for a quality, healthy, and fun alternative to traditional restaurant: The ABC concept offers the best benefits.offuii service restaurants such as convenience, affordability, and a fun. atmosphere to watch all your fa4orite' sports in a fun yet classy environment,: and enjoy live music such as:&mds, Dj`s and kamoke in the evenings:. But unlike typical full service restaurants,. ABC's product will be inventive, fresher and tast The dining.room is more comfortable for relaxed dining; busineier. ss Ianches, of a fun Place -to take the family: We will serve fall meals and drinks ill our front and back patios. Our full menu will consists.of Small plates, Salads and Entree during all business hours. s, full bar and will be available to patrons ABC will offer this menu served in an atmosphere that can accommodate a couple just out fora meal, or a group of virtually any size. Our casual, classy and relaxed seating -and dining.room arrangement allows flexibility not found in other dining restaurants. Marketing. Strategy ABC'smarketing strategy embodies the following main elements: • Provide a memorable dining experience: • Implement a Promotion Strategy that builds awareness and traffic. • Provide outstanding food quality and customer service. • Provide a friendly atmosphere in a convenient. location.. • Propide good music. and make all sports available for customers. Pricing Strategy. Pricing Stratery• Pricing will be competitive with local mid -scale restaurants, while maintaining a high price value perception based on superior food quality and unique menu offerings., The pricing strategy is based on affordable and: competitive pricing. The pricing structure takes into account overall market factors and competition. Pricing obiective- The price of our service is set to reflect quality service while trying to make it. affordable so that it appeals to our target market. Pricing Method: Pricing is based on the cost. of the products/services plus overhead administrative costs involved in. providing such service, plus a reasonable profit. and Promotion Strategy The Company's main marketing strategy will be that of high visibility and word. of mouth. The locationof the restaurant is in a highly visible area that can be seen by many people both driving and on foot; offering an inviting atmosphere to those in the area Item K-17 Communk Programs. lir the business world, itis important to develop good'teladdriships with the community that we do business -with and provide dur guests the best service and valuaobtaiitabl'e. We will demonstrate "best business" practices. and will conduct out business by a strict code of ethics: We will strive to achieve good will within the community andwill accomplish a high standing with other businesses and consumers alike.: Sales Strategy The restaurant will offer personalized service with employee -based knowledge about our products, The restaurant will have attractive. decor. and a relaxing atmosphere to ensure customer satisfaction. This restaurant will be definitely one of its kind. Customer care, customer satisfaction and full attention to customer needs are absolutely essential for the success and survival of the business. it is easier and less expensive to- maintain a current customer tliart it is to.attract a new one. We will embrace the following: • Focus attention on fulfilling the needs of every customer, in. a.timely manner. • Provide an environment whereby customers. will feel comfortable that their requirements are being handled efficiently. • Be proactive in greeting,. serving and appreciating every customer. • Thank.every, customer for coming and invite them back;: Make them feel welcome and that their businessis important to us, • Overall customer satisfaction will be our main priority.. • Provide. a variety.. of products that are appealing to. customers. • Maintain a well stocked inventory of goods. Security Plan after 931M pm ABC plans to and wilt takeall necessary steps to provide accurate security measures for its customers and. employees. For live. musicevents, air 930 pm when it will be 21 and over one in-house security person for each. 75 patrons: will be on duty, All security personnel will. be attired in a manner to readily identify them as such. From the. time a live music event ends and for 30 minutes thereafter, one-half of aU security personnel will be stationed outside the premises to assist and encourage Patrons to leave safely. For live events, pre -sale and day -of -sale ticket sales will not exceed capacity. Security staff will regularly patrol both the women's and men's bathroom facilities Video cameras. will be mounted to cover the entrance;' exits. and entire premises.. Tapes will be made available upon request by the local. Police Department. Security staff will regularly patrol the immediate exterior of the building at.least once every half-hour, doing so on. a random basis: ABC will familiarize all security staff with provisions of the local ordinance for unruly patron. ordinance. Item K-18 ® When a patron acts in a manner that is violent; abusive, indecent, profane;, boisterous, or otherwise disordcriy,. AgC,s Staff will- immediately contact the police and request that police invoke the provisions of the ordinance. ABC,. its managers; and employees may not sell, dispense; or give away alcohol to any person who is under the influence of alcoholic, beverage as defined n. the local ordinance, nor shall such a person be permitted on the premises. When a customer has been "cut off.", the server will notify the other employees. Management will support the server's decision. to terminate service to: any customer. If a customer is too impaired to drive safely, licensee will try to persuade the customer not to drive, and aaange a safe. ride. If the customer refuses, management will notify the location Police Department. with a description of the. person andthe license plate number of the vehicle, if possible. All identification cards used to prove age must be valid (i e:, may not be expired), and. must 'be government issued. If the. identification card' is expired or appears at all questionable to the employee, the employee shall 'request a second. for of identification. The employee will mare sure that the individual purchasing the liquor resembles the identification card. All employees to their identiare encouraged to ask purchasers questions relating fication in order to verify the information: If the employee checking an ID has a.strong suspicion that an ID is false, altered, or belongs to someone other than the person presenting the ID,he/she shall: confiscate the ID and turn it over to management; to be presented to the police. The police will be called, in a timely manner, anytime management or staff has information to believe a crime has. been or is about to be committed and/or whenever a threat of or act of violence occurs on the IS premises or off premises in -areas that would be considered in view or earshot of the establishment. Security or management g ent will ask anyone who is fighting to leave. If necessary, security or management will call the local law enforcement agency for assistance. Licensee will Permanently refuse admittance to any chronic problem encounter. • Music No Live bands or DJ's will be playing. and music out doors. All music will be played inside of the premises. The noise level will not exceed the maximum allowed by the city ordinance. Item K-19 Our Menu Tapas! Starters selection of olives $6 oyster & cremini mushrooms $6 seasonal daily. greens $6 blistered padroi . peppers, spanish sea. satt $6 chefs daily selection of 3 spanish cheeses $15• chef's daily, selection of spanish cured meats $1.81 4 oz pork shoulder conserva $$ 4 oz chicken liver conserva $10 4 oz salmon. conserva $12 chained rustic bread, raw garlid, vine ripe tomato $6 spanish flatbread, basil & mint, manchego, figs $7 Wispy eggplant,: honey,. spiced yogurt $6 fried potatoes. smoked paprika allioli $6 whipped salt cod and potato, grilled bread $9 albondigas, saffron, allspice $7 grilled shrimp, lemort, garlic $8 fried calarnar, garlic allioli $8; tortilla espaftola $6 paella cake, tomato -saffron. $8 dailyertipanada $8 pork croquetas $7 Paellas vegetarian: seasonal vegetables $18 castellana: beef, pork, chicken $20 mariner seasonal. shellfish $22 valenciana; surf & turf $24 Lunch Menu soups and. salads chilled heirloomtomato soup with trema fresca, black grapes $C aromatic seafood stew ofbass, mussels, clams, saffron $10 wild arugula with baby, tomatoes, hazelnuts, roasted garlic vinaigrette $13 heirloom tomato salad, beigian endive, olive vinaigrette $-% fresh hearts of palm salad, radicchio, lomo ham, parsley, tarragon $9 olive oil marinated spanish tuna with fennel -apple salad $13 petite romaine hearts; garlic dressing; herb croutons,. boccarories, $10 Sandwiches All served with toasted bread rubbed with raw tomato and garlic, side of arugula and pickled onions (choice of daily side salad or fried potatoes) grilled three cheese $8i jamon serrano and manchego cheese $10. grilled chicken and chorizo $10 conserva tuna salad with herb alioli $9 grilled: garlic shrimp $12 braised pock shoulder $11 braised short rib $12 flatbreads. three cheeses $8 Item K-20 • basil -mint, mahonj black mission figs $9 m mesco, pine nu%..marichego,.grilled apple,. arugula $10 three sausages $11 Dinner Menu first chilled heirloom tomato soup, crema fresca,. black grapes. $6 aromatia seafood stew of bass, mussels, clams, saffron $14 citrus marinated shrimp, coriander leaf, grilled bread $12 heirloom bean soup, fldeo, morcilla, catalunya sausage $13 wild arugula, baby tomatoes, hazelnuts, roasted garlic vinaigrette $13 fresh hearts of palm salad, radicchio, lomo ham, parsley; tarragon $8 olive oil -marinated Spanish tuna, fennel, granny smith apple $13 warm octopus salad., while nectarine, herbs, smoked paprika $12 crispy pork belly; brussels sprouts; fried egg, salbixtada $14 quail stuffed with tart cherries, apricots, chorizo, roasted figs $15 second pan -roasted chicken, endive; apples, salsa verde $21 roast duck breast; beluga lentils; anise spiced pear, sweet-sour strawberries $24. braised short rib; olive oil crushed potato, red wine reduction $23 12 oz rib. -eye steak, patatas bravas, gallego sauce $25. dessert menu crema catalana custard with orange essence $7 • chilled cinnamon rice pudding.candied pecans, caramel $7 bitter chocolate mousse Spanish sea salt, e,v. olive oil $7 bar celona SO creme brulee, chocolate, & coffee ice cream fried banana., whipped cream $9 selection of ice. cream or sorbets daily selections $7 seasonal fruit crisp for two $10 (Please note that the prices•and menu options listed here., are subject to change without notice) • Item K-21 • 41 SECURITY PLAN for ABC Restaurant and Sports B91- job ar job Description: To maintain a safe, secure, and .f iendly environment for the guests as well as the staff. job Duties: 1. Greeting. the guest: • A simple friendly warm greeting "Hello, how is. your night. going? "May. I see your ID?" Also, thank the guest because without:them we would not have a lob! • Be nice and courteous being rude is not acceptable. • If the guests appears to be intoxicated turn them away or get a manager for approval. 2. Checldng. ID's: • Every person who enters the building must be 21 and must show valid proof of age. • Swipe every ID checker if available. Acceptableforms of identification: (Assuming, the person is the same asor! the ID) Level 1- Obvious 21 Level 2- Suspicious, may need manager approval • California Drivers License (Level 1) • California Identification Card (Level 1) • Out of state driver's license. (Level 1) • Out of state Identification Cards.(Level.2) • Military ID (Level 2) • Passport (Level 2) We DO NOT accept: • Checking cashing cards • School ID's • Ekpired ID.'s Anything.out.of the ordinary should go through a manager: • Birth Certificates with a picture ID • Temporary ID • International ID's EXHIBIT E Item K-22 If you at any time purposely let in a. minor or take cash o get a person in or to the front of the line you wdl'be TERMINATED on the spot BE AWAKE people are going.to try pass bogus or someone else's. ID. to get. in, if you. are not comfortable with the ID don't argue with the person just explain to them you need a 20d opinion and call a manager.: 3. Dress Code: • Dress code is a tool we use to weed out the undesirables and keep the problem people out NO Entry with any of the following: • Over sized baggy. clothing • Workout attire • . Gang or Prison Tatto's • Du Rags • Shirts without sleeves • Gang affiliated attire • Tank Tops 4. Maintaining Occupancy Count: Max capacity for this location is approximately 200 people. • Doorman is responsible for keeping an occupancy count using 2 tally. counters 1- in 2- out. 4o At no.time do we exceed max capacity.. A supervisor should be notified 25 people prior to reaching max capacity or if there is a discrepancy in the count 9 A manager needs to be notified ASAP when police or Fire Dept arrive, assist in anyway possible. 5. Maintaining Your Station: • Stations are rotated every % hour.. • Keep visual or radio contact withother door hosts • Look for Hot Areas • Hot Areas: • Cover change • Overcrowded Areas • Spills or -broken glass • Dance Floor • Bathrooms. • Big Parties • Parking lot Item K-23 • 6..Problem with Guests: Any patroiT who does any of the following.shall be removed from the premise - 1 fights or challenges: another person to fight • 2 maliciously and willfully disturbs another person by loud or unreasoned noise •. 3 uses offensive words which are inherently likely to provoke immediate violent. reaction Serious Issues: Fighting both parties: leave (not at the same -time) Drug using, or selling Vandalism Throwing up Theft Fraud Under 21 fake ID Sneaking in Alcohol Smoking ® 7. ClosingTirne: • Last call is 1:30; lights onmusic off at 1:40, politely -ask guests to Ieave the building • Work.to close out. sections of the club starting,with the back room, dance floor,. etc • 2-4 inside, 2 at the front door, I at the side door. and 2-4 outside Z. • No alcohol is to leave the building • Give time for guests. to. finish their drinks • Don't yell or swear at the guests to get them to leave • Goal is to have everyone out of the building by tam • 8. Closing Time in the. Parking Lot: • Politely ask guest to leave DO NOT get into an argument over them not leaving quickly • Parking lot must be. cleaned 100% of trash, bottles, vomit, or urine. • If altercation breaks out in. the parking lit between guests DO NOT jump in and try to break it up until. help arrives. • Get license plate cars that are involved in altercations or accidents, always fill out an incident report first thing, • Goal is. to have all guests out of the parking lot by 2:15 Item K-24 9. Other Duties: • Maintain clean restrooms • Emptytrash cans when full • Picking. up empty bottles; glasses and trash • Cleaning up the parlang for • Brining in patio furniture and sf ' age 10. Cardinal Rules of Security:: • Do not ever hit or strike a patron • Do not ever exceed the occupancy load • Do not ever let a minor inside the facility 11. Security Attire: • Security personnel are required by the entertainment permit issued for the licensed. premises shall be.in a uniform or clothing which is readily. identifiable as a security person. 12. lncidentLog: • An incident log shall be maintained. on the premise on a continual basis with at least one year of entries and be. readily available for inspection by police department. R The log is for recording any physical altercations; injuries; and objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance occurring. in, on, or at the licensed premises, including the immediately adjacent area that is owned, leased, or rented. by the license r The log will indicate date, time, description of incident, and action taken Item K-25 • n �J Our Menlo Tapas/ Starters selection of olives $6 . oyster t.cremini'mushrooms $6 seasonal daily greens $6 briste4d. padron peppers, spanish sea salt $6. chef s daily selection of 3. spanish cheeses. $15 chefs daily selection of spanish cured meats $18 4 oz pork shoulder conserva $9; 4 oz chicken liver conserva $10 4 oz salmon conserva $12, charred rustic bread, raw garlic,. vine ripe. tomato $6 spanish flatbread, basil & mint; manchega; figs $7' crispy eggplant,. honey, spiced yogurt $6 fried potatoes, smoked paprika allioli $6 whipped salt cod and potato, grilled bread $9 albondigas,. saffron, allspice $7 grilled shrimp, lemon, garlic.$8 fried calamar, garlic. allioli $9 tortilla espaflola $6 paella cake, tomato -saffron. $8 daily empanada $8 pork cro4uetas $7 Paellas vegetarian: seasonal vegetables $18 castellana: beef, pork, chicken $20 mannaera: seasonal shellfish $22 valenciona; surf & turf $24 Lunch Menu soups and salaft chilled: heirloom tomato soup with crema Resta; black grapes $6 aromatic seafood stew of bass, mussels, clams, saffrorr $10 wild arugula with baby tomatoes, hazelnuts, roasted garlic vinaigrette $13 heirloom tomato salad,. belgian endive, olive vinaigrette $10 fresh.hearts of palm salad; radicchio, tomo ham, parsley, tarragon $9 olive oil marinated spanish tuna with fennekapple salad $13 petite romaine hearts, garlic dressing, herb croutons, boccarones $10 San.dwlches All served with toasted bread rubbed with raw tomato and garlic, side of arugula and pickled onions. (choice of daily side salad or fried potatoes.) grilled three cheese $8 jamon serraho. and manchego cheese. $10 grilled chicken and chorizo $10 conserva tuna salad with herb alioli $9 grilled garlic shrimp $12 braised pork shoulder $11 braised short rib. 512 flat breads three cheeses $8 711 t (l 2 EXHIBIT F Item K-26 basil -mint, Mahon, black mission figs $9 romesco, pine nuts, manchego, grilled apple; arugula $10 thres.sausages $11 Dinner Menu first chilled heirloom tomato soup, crema fresca, black.grapes $B aromatic seafood stew of bass, mussels, clams, saffron $10 citrus marinated shrimp, coriander leaf, gritted bread $12 heirloom been. soup, fideo, morcilla, catalunya sausage $:13 wild arugula, baby tomatoes, hazelnuts, roasted garlic vinaigrette $13 fresh hearts of palm salad, radicchio, lomo ham, parsley, tarragon $8 olive oil -marinated Spanish tuna, fennel, granny Smith apple. $13 warm octopus salad, white nectarine, hefts; smoked. paprika $12 crispy pork belly, brussels. sprouts, fried egg, salbfkbda $1'4 quail stufead with tart cherries, apricots, chorizo, roasted. figs $15 second pan -roasted. chicken, endive, apples, salsa verde $21 roast duck breast. beluga lentils, anise spiced pear, Sweet-sour strawberries $24 braised short rib, olive oil crushed potato, red wine reduction $23. 12 oz rib -eye steak, patatas bravos, , gallego..sauce $25 dessert menu trema catalana custard with orange essence $T chilled cinnamon rice pudding.candied pecans,. caramel $7 bitter chocolates mousse Spanish sea salt, em. olive oil $7 bar celona split creme brulee, chocolate, & coffee'lce cream fried banana, whipped cream $9 selection of ice cream or sorbets daily :selections $7 seasonal frit crisp for two $10 (Please note. that the prices and menu options listed here are subject to change without notice) Item K-27 !Mayor L. DENN ITCHAEL - /Playas PMTe»z SAM SPAGNOLO' Council Memben WILLLAM J. ALEXANDER, CHUCK 8LQuEr,..DW.4E Wiu [Ams; C1ry Managir )Otto I GmWoN • THE Crry, OF: RANCHO: CUCAMONGA AWHO �U�CAMONGA June 19, 2012 Thomas Winery Plaza Attn:Michael Chesser' 7945 Vineyard avenue, Suite 0-5 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9173 SUBJECT. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2012-00536 -THOMAS WINERY PLAZA LLC -A request for a minor exception to reduce the. required parking for the. Thomas Winery Plaza by - 20 y20 percent throughout the entire shopping center within the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill. Boulevard District (Subarea 2), located at the northeast comer of Foothifl Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN'0208-101-22 through 25. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to- State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. Dear Mr: Chesser The Planning Department has reviewed your application for a Minor Exception. Based upon plan review and/or site inspection; staff has made the following findings:: • 1. The application applies to the parcels,within the Specialty Commercial (SC) District, Subarea. 2 of the Foothill Boulevard District, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and. Vineyard avenue APN: 0208-101.22 through 25.. 2'. This: proposed reduction of the.. -required on-site parking isrequired. to permh the existing and any additional food uses on-site. The proposeduses require 583 parking spaces to adhere to the Development Code requirements: A Parking Analysis prepared by Clyde E: Sweet and Associates on May 30, 2012, was submitted by the applicant and it indicates that' at peak demand itis estimated. that the shopping center will only utilize 468 of the 511 parking spaces that are currently located on the site. 3. The reduction is necessary to allow for the property owner to have flexibility with the types of tenants that can occupy the spaces within the center and compete with the shopping centers that surround the site:. 4. The Development Code allows. for a' Minor Exception procedure for the consideration of reducing the maximum number of required on-site parking spaces from 583 to 468 spaces, pursuant to Section 17.040.050. This application contemplates a 20 percent reduction which: will provide a surplus of parking and allow for flexibility, with proposed users: 5. As. required. by Section 17.0.4.050 of the Development Code, all property owners contiguous to. the subject property were notified by mail regarding this applicant's request. A ten -calendar day comment period was provided; no comments were received. The above findings of fact support the necessary findings that are required by the: City's Development Code and are listed below: • 1. That the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result. in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the General EXHIBIT G, p� std l° -I '7/1/ /12, :ueur,onga CA 1) 1729-0807 • Tel (909) 477-27(]0 •Fix ;9R'�) 477-2849 • .cww.0 iryofRC.us ft}: Item K-28 APPROVAL LETTER' MiNOR. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00536 — THOMAS WINERY PLAZA LLC. June 19; 2012 Page 2 Plan and intent of the. Development. Code as the reduction of.on-site: parking provides flexibility to allow potential tenants of various uses to occupy the,center without creating a deficiency in parking as the parking analysis. states.. 2. That there are exceptional circumstances. or conditions appficable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that. do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. There are only two small areas where parcels are zoned with the Specialty Commercial District designation. These sites already limit, the type of uses that can be conducted, and the parking requirement restricts them even more.. 3. That the strict or literal interpretation andenforcement of the specked regulations would deprive.the applicant of privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the same district. The property owner would be limited in the types of tenants that could occupy the site. 4. That the granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of a special prniilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified -in the same district, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious. to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Therefore,, your request has been approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval is for the reduction of required ort -site parking by 20 percent or from 583 parking spaces. to 468 parking, spaces, The site contains 511 usable parking: spaces at the Thomas Winery Plaza located on the northeast 'comer of Foothill. Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APK 0208-101-22 through 26. 2. The applicant shall comply with all applicable codes and obtain the necessary. Building Permits from the Buiiding and Safety Department: 3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City; its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs grid 'attorney's fees which'the City, its'agents, officers;' or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4. Prior to any use of the project site, all' Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with. all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. This decision,shall be final following.a ten-day appeal period. Any appeals shall be made in writing to the Secretary of the Planning Commission along with a $2,050 filing fee. Item K-29 APPROVAL. LETTER MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ORC2012-00536 ; THOMAS WINERY PLAZA LLC ® June 19; 2012 Page: 3" .If you have any questions, piease da not hesitate to contact Steve- Fowler. at (909)1477-2750, Monday through Thurslay between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Sincerely, PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2ey5l5/om, Interim Planning Director JAB:SF/ge 40 • Item K-30 • RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00057, A REQUEST TO OPERATE A 7,597 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT AND BAR WITH ENTERTAINMENTAND OUTDOOR DINING IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE AT 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD -APN: 0208-101-23; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. I. SSB Partners Inc., filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of July 11, 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on July 11, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of approximately 405 feet along Vineyard Avenue (parcel 0208-101-23), and a lot depth of approximately 297 feet. The entire center has street frontages of approximately fet along Vineyard Avenue, and approximately 560 feet along both San Bernardino Road and o thill Boulevard, which is presently improved with an existing shopping center consisting of pad buildings, inline tenant buildings, parking areas, and landscaping; and b. The properties to the north consist of both office and single-family residences in the Office and Low -Medium zoning Districts respectively, to the south is a commercial strip center and gas station in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 2) to the east and west are shopping centers in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 2), and the subject property is in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 2); and C. The applicant is proposing to operate a restaurant and bar with entertainment and outdoor eating areas totaling 7,597 square feet at the Thomas Winery Plaza in the historic Thomas is Winery building; and Item K-31 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057 — SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 2 d. The applicant is concurrently processing Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 in order to allow live bands, dancing, a disc jockey and karaoke. The partnership is also processing Minor Development Review DRC2012-00696 to allow for the construction of the outdoor dining area on the north side of the building; and e. The restaurant with full bar service is a conditionally permitted use in the Specialty Commercial District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and. 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed use is in accordance with General Plan Policy LU -1.3 that encourages commercial centers to provide a broad range of retail and service needs for the community. With the addition of the restaurant and bar with outdoor dining to the shopping center, the shopping center can expand its services and attract a wider range of residents. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as conditions have been imposed to ensure the proper service of alcohol to patrons, and the building complies with all applicable Fire and Building Codes. C. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code as the use occupies an existing building that is in conformance with the Development Code as it relates to parking, setbacks, height, etc., and sufficient conditions have been imposed to ensure that the use will comply with the Performance Standards set forth in Section 17.10.050 of the Development Code and will not create adverse impacts upon adjacent uses. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities because the project does not result in any major interior or exterior alterations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannina Deaartment 1) Approval is hereby granted for the operation, sale and service of alcoholic beverages (i.e., beer, wine, and distilled spirits) in conjunction with a 7,597 square foot restaurant and bar with outdoor dining in the Specialty Commercial District of Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Item K-32 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057 — SBC PARTNERS INC ® July2012 Page3 Page 3 District, located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue at 8916 Foothill Boulevard — APN: 0208-101-23. The restaurant use shall be a "bona fide eating place" as defined in California Business and Professions Code Section 23038. 2) Entertainment shall not be provided without a valid Entertainment Permit. The business shall comply with all conditions of approval for such Entertainment Permit, including without limitation the hours of operation set forth in the Entertainment Permit. 2) Approval of this Conditional Use Permit to allow a bar and service of alcoholic beverages with meals shall be contingent upon the applicant's ability to secure approval of a Type 47 Liquor License issued by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for this location. 3) The days and hours of operation shall be limited to Friday and Saturday: 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. and Sundays through Thursday: 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. 4) The business shall adhere to all requirements of the security plan that was provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as part of this • application. The requirements can not be modified without prior written approval by the Planning Department and Police Department, 5) The sale of alcohol shall cease no less than thirty (30) minutes before . the closing time. 6) Alcohol sales shall not exceed 50 percent of gross receipts for the business. The business owner shall provide the City with an audited report including receipts for all sales upon request. Violation of this condition will result in Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 being brought before the Planning Commission for review and possible revocation. 7) The restaurant operator shall adhere to all food service requirements and operations regulations for a Type 47 License as prescribed by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Failure to abide by all applicable ABC Regulations or all Conditions of Approval shall result in Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 being brought before the Planning Commission for review. Review by the Planning Commission for non-compliance with ABC Regulations or Conditions of Approval may result in evidentiary hearing(s), modification(s) to Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 and possible termination of use. 8) If the approved operation of the business creates law enforcement and/or fire safety problems, such as, but not limited to, loitering and disturbances, noise, overcrowding, intoxication at the premises, ® blocked fire exits, etc., the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought Item K-33 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057 — SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 4 before the Planning Commission for consideration of modification and/or revocation. 9) This facility shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as identified in the Development Code Section 17.10.050. If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses, residential land uses or operations, this Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use. 10) Applicant shall adhere to all conditions of the previously approved Conditional Use Permit DRC87-26 and it modification 11) All historical artifacts both inside and outside the building shall be inventoried and maintained in place. They shall be protected while any construction activities are occurring within the vicinity of these artifacts. The conveyor may be moved from its current location with the approval and consultation with the Planning Director and the Building Official. 12) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees, which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 13) Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. 14) The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the Building and Safety Department and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to operation. 15) No modifications to the floor plan or intensification of the use shall be permitted without prior review and approval by the Planning Commission. 16) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 17) This Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. Item K-34 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057 — SBC PARTNERS INC • July 11, 2012 Page 5 18) Applicant shall include information about the history of the Thomas Winery and still building in the food and drink menu. Alcohol Service: 19) Applicant must use an identity card scanner (ID Scanner) anytime the premises is selling alcoholic beverages and has entertainment as defined by Section 5.12 of the Municipal Code. (Definition of ID Scanner: An ID Scanner automates and documents the age verification process by scanning the ID through a card reader). The ID Scanner should record and timestamp the name, identification number, and date of birth on the identity card provided by patrons. This information should be recorded and maintained for a minimum of thirty (30) days. The business will provide the ID Scanner records to law enforcement upon request. 20) If persons under 21 years of age are allowed on the premises after midnight, the licensee(s) must utilize separate types of glassware to distinguish alcoholic drinks from non-alcoholic drinks. Additionally, persons over 21 years of age shall have a unique mark or symbol applied to the backside their hand that readily identifies them as a person who can be served an alcoholic drink. • 21) Patrons who appear obviously intoxicated shall not be served any alcoholic beverages. 22) There shall be no promotions encouraging intoxication or drinking contests or advertisements indicating "Buy one drink, get one free," "Two for the price of one," or "All you can drink for ..." or similar language. 23) There shall be no "stacking" of drinks, i.e., more than one drink at a time, to a single patron. 24) Except for wine bottles, oversized containers or pitchers containing in excess of 25 ounces of an alcoholic drink shall not be sold to a single patron for their sole consumption. 25) The sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises is strictly prohibited. 26) Employees and contract security personnel shall not consume any alcoholic beverages during their work shift. 27) A file containing the names and dates of employment of every person serving alcoholic beverages for consumption by patrons on the licensed premises and every manager shall be kept on the premises. The file shall also include a copy of each person's certificate of completion of the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control L.E.A.D. • course (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) or equivalent. Upon request, said file shall be made available for review to Item K-35 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057 — SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 6 representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. New employees will have 90 days from date of employment to obtain L.E.A.D. certification or equivalent. 28) There shall be a Designated Driver Program wherein there is an incentive to the person not drinking alcoholic beverages, who is in a group of three or more, to be the designated driver for that group of patrons. Said Designated Driver Program shall be identified in all menus and provided on interior signage. 29) There shall be a taxi -ride program where the establishment will offer to call a taxi for patrons when it seems appropriate. Phone numbers of local taxi companies shall be prominently posted .for viewing by patrons. Security: 30) Except in case of emergency, the licensee shall not permit its patrons to enter or exit the licensed premises through any entrance/exit other than the primary entrance/exit, excluding entrances/exits from patio areas. Steps shall be taken by the licensee to discourage unauthorized exiting. 31) Any patron who (1) fights or challenges another person to fight, (2) maliciously and willfully disturbs another person by loud or unreasoned. noise, or (3) uses offensive words which are inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction shall be removed from the premises. 32) An incident log shall be maintained at the licensed premises on a continual basis with at least one year of entries and be readily available for inspection by a police officer. The log is for recording any physical altercations, injuries, and objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance occurring in, on, or at the licensed premises, including the immediately adjacent area that is owned, leased, or rented by the licensee. The log will indicate date, time, description of incident, and action taken. "Objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance" means disturbance of the peace, public drunkenness, drinking in public, harassment of passersby, gambling, prostitution, loitering, public urination, lewd conduct, drug trafficking, or excessive loud noise. 33) Security personnel required by the Entertainment Permit issued for the licensed premises shall be in a uniform or clothing that is readily identifiable as a security person. They shall maintain order and enforce the establishments no loitering policy and shall take "reasonable steps" (as that term is defined in subparagraph (3) of Section 24200 of the California Business and Professions Code) to correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance. 34) The owner or manager of the licensed premises shall maintain on the premises a written security policy and procedures manual addressing at a minimum the following items: Handling obviously intoxicated Item K-36 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057 — SBC PARTNERS INC ® July 11, 2012 Page 7 Persons; establishing a reasonable ratio of employees to patrons, based upon activity level, in order to monitor beverage sales and patron behavior, handling patrons involved in fighting or arguing; handling loitering about the building and in the immediate adjacent area that is owned, leased, rented, or used under agreement by the Licensee(s); verifying age/checking identification of patrons; warning patrons of reaching their drinking limit/potential intoxication and refusing to serve; calling the police regarding observed or reported criminal activity. 35) Contract security services shall be familiar with the establishment's written security policy and procedures; by reviewing them and signing they have read and understood the policy. The signed acknowledgement shall be kept in a file relating to the security manual. 36) Prior to utilizing a contract security guard company, the establishment shall verify the security company has a current City of Rancho Cucamonga business license. 37) Install a closed circuit television system capable of readily identifying facial features and stature of all patrons entering the establishment during hours of entertainment. Videos are to be recorded, and a library • of events shall be kept and available for inspection by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. Fire Department: FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR TENANTIMPROVEMENT .1) Submit plans to Building and Safety for fire review; include in the plans a copy of the CA Fire code Chapter 14 for "Fire Safety During Construction and Demolition." The plans shall provide the building data such as square footage (existing and proposes) type of construction, occupancy group(s), the number of stories and indicate if the building is equipped with automatic fire sprinklers". An Assembly Use Permit per the Fire Code will be required. Provide the following notes in the plans: BEFORE CALLING FOR INSPECTION PLEASE COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 2) A fire inspection and final approval is required before the Building Department will accept a building final inspection request. To schedule a fire inspection, please call (909) 477-2777 or go on-line at www.rctops.org . Fire Construction Services (FCS) personnel can be reached at (909) 477-2713. • 3) A Knox box must be purchased and installed in accordance with RCFPD policy, unless the Knox box already exists on the building. The Item K-37 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057 — SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 8 policy and Knox box application are available at the Building and Safety counter. 4) The key to the building or suite must be given to the fire inspector at the time of final inspection. The key will be locked in the Knox box for fire department emergency access. 5) Fire extinguishers must be installed per the RCFPD policy.. The policy is available at the Building and Safety counter. 6) The occupant must fill out the blue FCS's "Emergency Contact Information" form prior to final inspection. Present the completed form to the fire inspector at the time of final fire inspection. The form is available at the Building and Safety counter. 7) If sprinkler modifications are required a separate plan must be submitted for review and approval. Work shall not commence until a .permit is obtained. Inspection of rough piping must be performed prior to concealment. Ceiling tiles must not be installed until the rough piping is approved by the fire inspector. 8) If an automatic or manual fire alarm system (including fire sprinkler monitoring,) installation, repair or modifications are required, plans must be submitted separately for review and approval. Fire alarm work shall not commence until a permit is obtained. 9) If a type 1 hood for commercial cooking is installed, a fixed fire suppression system is required; plans must be submitted separately for review and approval. Work shall not commence until a permit is obtained. 10) If the building is equipped with automatic fire sprinklers the general contractor must confirm that the 5 -year certification of the fire sprinkler system is current. The certificate must be affixed to the system riser. If the system is not certified, the General Contractor must contact the building owner. A qualified company must certify the system prior to final inspection. 11) The suite address must be installed on all exterior doors of the suite in 4 -inch high letters contrasting with the background. 12) The duct smoke detectors required by the 2007 CA Mechanical Code for HVAC shut down must not be interconnected to the fire sprinkler monitoring alarm; when the duct detectors are not installed in a normally occupied space they must be equipped with an audible and visual notification device including a test and reset. controls in accordance to the 2007 CA Fire Code. 13) Fire safety during construction and demolition must be observed; please, familiarize yourself and your employees with the CA Fire Code chapter 14 regulations. Item K-38 • �J • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057 — SBC PARTNERS INC July 1.1, 2012 Page 9 14) False alarms which summon the fire department which are caused by construction personnel will be charged a false alarm fee by the fire department. 15) The approval of these plans does not constitute approval of any building or fire code violation. Any code violation observed by the fire inspector must be corrected before and occupancy clearance is granted by Fire Construction Services. 16) The approval of these plans does not include work that may be shown on the plans which is not in the scope of the permit issued. Hazardous materials (including wholesale and retail exempt amounts), fire suppression/fire detection systems, merchandise display fixtures, storage racks, warehouse storage, production processes and/or equipment installation are explicitly excluded from this approval and will require separate plan check submittal and Fire Code permits. Engineering: 1) Construction and demolition Deposit/ Administration Fee — If valuation is over $100,000. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11 TH DAY OF JULY 2012. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONraa Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: 4CanBumett, Senior Planner I, Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th dey of July 2012, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA NONE WIMBERLY NONE Item K-39 F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2012-00057 AND DRC2012-00696 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: SSB PARTNERS INC LOCATION: 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD —APN: 0208-101-23 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolutions of Approval No. 12-31 and 12-11, / Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealedistamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption = $50 X B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date ® of approval. No extensions are allowed. SC -12-08 Item K-40 C. !9] E. Project No. DRC2o1&:2M Completion Date Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Gardens Master Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fre Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval priorto the issuance of building permits. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Shopping Centers 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for mon: than 24 hours. 3. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2 Item K-41 11_ / /_ Project No. DRC2012-00057 Completion Date • F. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. _/ /_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: I /_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and �. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC2010-00355 and DRC2010-00356) clearly g. identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architectt's/Engineees stamp and "wer signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to 1 I_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. ! /_ 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the I /_ Building and Safety Department. H. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / !_ marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2012-00057 and DRC2012-00696). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application.., Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _I I through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 3. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _I / counter). Item K-42 Project No. D_BC20_ 12.gm Completion Date L Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for fire -resistive construction. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Provide draft stops in combustible attic areas and concealed space in accordance with CBC. 4. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations and mix occupancy ratios. S. Provide documentation and calculation for compliance with the California Energy Standard regulations. 6. Address on the plans the required compliance with the California Accessibility Standards. 7. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. 4 Item K-43 JOHN McMAHON, SHERIFF -CORONER Date: September 17, 2014 To: Jeff Bloom, City of Rancho Cucamonga From: Deputy Janna Kovensky, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Deputy Jason Whitsell and I (Deputy Janna Kovensky) are currently assigned to the Alcohol Compliance Team (A.C.T.) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The primary functions of our position are: to monitor and enforce all ABC Laws, monitor crimes committed at licensed alcohol establishments, continuous business inspections (alcohol establishments), first point of contact for all city departments, primary investigators of city ordinance violations, and prepare reports, citations or arrests as appropriate. On a regular basis, we conduct random inspections of locations that serve alcohol to ensure they are following ABC laws, their conditional use permits, and their entertainment permits. The following statistics are for Sixty -Six Sports Lounge located at 8916 Foothill Blvd # K1 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Total Calls for service 06/05/13-09/03/14: 30 • False alarm calls: 17 • Murder: 1 (Occurred in the parking lot behind the 66, suspects came from 66, one victim deceased) • Assault with a deadly weapon: 1 (Occurred in the parking lot behind the 66, suspects came from 66, one victim stabbed, related to the murder) • Fights:3 • Noise issues: 3 4 DUI's from location: Approximately 6 • False alarm calls from Coffee Klatch since 66 opened: 6 • Before 66 opened: 0 ABC Violations • Not posting necessary ABC signage (Cancer/pregnancy signs). • • 3 separate occasions with adulterated alcohol (2 citation issues). • Refusal to post ABC and Business license. It took 3 inspections and a citation for not posting the business license before they would post it. ! BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT EXHIBIT B California 92415-0061 Post Office Box 569 o San Bernardino, California 92402-0569 Item K-44 JOHN McMAHON, SHERIFF -CORONER Date: September 17, 2014 To: Jeff Bloom, City of Rancho Cucamonga From: Deputy Janna Kovensky, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Deputy Jason Whitsell and I (Deputy Janna Kovensky) are currently assigned to the Alcohol Compliance Team (A.C.T.) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The primary functions of our position are: to monitor and enforce all ABC Laws, monitor crimes committed at licensed alcohol establishments, continuous business inspections (alcohol establishments), first point of contact for all city departments, primary investigators of city ordinance violations, and prepare reports, citations or arrests as appropriate. On a regular basis, we conduct random inspections of locations that serve alcohol to ensure they are following . ABC laws, their conditional use permits, and their is entertainment permits. Violations of their conditional use permit • Refusal to post ABC and Business license -It took 3 inspections and a citation for not posting the business license before they would post it. • Not using ID scanner on entertainment nights. • 05/24/14: Car show in the parking lot with alcohol and no permit. • 06/26/14: During World Cup Soccer, opened early. Violations of entertainment permit • They have outside speakers which cause noise issues and projects the entertainment from inside outside of the location. • Flashing lights. • All doors open during entertainment — must be closed. • Not using 7 security guards. • Business and licensing admission tax always paid late. 3AN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT lino, California 92415-0061 Post Office Box 569 o San Bernardino, California 92402-0569 EXHIBIT C Item K-45 ssRa GRou?, INC. ® 8916 Foothill Blvd Suite K1 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 909-466-9900 Date: August 26, 2014 Planning Commission City Of Rancho Cucamonga California. Re: Opening Hours We are requesting you to amend our CUP to state that we can open our business at 9 am everyday at our Sixty6 Sports lounge located at 8916 Foothill Blvd Suite K1 Rancho Cucamonga.. The reason for this request is to make sure that we can be open to our patrons for all the sporting events that are taking place in the world. We lost a lot of business with the World Cup starting the games at 9. The NFL starts its games at 10am, so we would like to be open and 9 and make sure we get our customers enough time to come and get situated prior to the starting of the games. ®We would really appreciate your help in this matter. Please feel free to contact me for any concerns. E EXHIBIT D Item K-46 • Thomas Winery Plaza Property Owner, LLC 7945 Vineyard Avenue, Suite D-5 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 phone 805.604.2640 fax 805.604.2641 August 27, 2014 Bobby Bedi Sixty 6 8916 Foothill Blvd, Suite K-1 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Modification of business hours for Suite K-1 Dear Mr. Bedi, Please accept this letter as Landlord's consent to modify business hours at Sixty 6 Restaurant, located at • 8916 Foothill Blvd, Ste. K-1, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, to allow business to open at 9:00, seven days a week. If you have questions, please don't hesitate to call our office at 909-945-0505 or 805-604-2640. Sincerely, Thomas Winery Plaza Property Owner, LLC Michael Chesser Manager EXHIBITS Item K-47 RESOLUTION NO. 14-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2014-00774, A REQUEST TO MODIFY AN APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (DRC2012-00057) TO INCREASE THE HOURS OF OPERATION IN ORDER TO OPEN EARLIER FOR AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AND BAR (SIXTY6 SPORTS LOUNGE) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE WITHIN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL (SC) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AT 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUITE K1- APN: 0208-101-23; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. SSRB Group Inc., filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit (Modification) DRC2014-00774, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on September 24, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of approximately 405 feet along Vineyard Avenue (parcel 0208-101-23), and a lot depth of approximately 297 feet. The entire center has street frontages of approximately 744 feet along Vineyard Avenue, and approximately 560 feet along both San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard, which is presently improved with an existing shopping center consisting of pad buildings, inline tenant buildings, parking areas, and landscaping; and b. The properties to the north consist of both office and single-family residences in the Office and Low -Medium zoning Districts respectively, to the south is a commercial strip center and gas station in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 2) to the east and west are shopping centers in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 2), and the subject property is in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 2); and ® C. The applicant proposes expanding hours of operation in order to open at 9:00 a.m., seven days per week, for the operation of a restaurant and bar with entertainment and outdoor eating areas totaling 7,597 square feet at the Thomas Winery Plaza in the historic Thomas Winery Item K-48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-42 DRC2014-00774— SSRB GROUP, INC. September 24, 2014 Page 2 building; and 3. Based upon the substantial _evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public. hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. Restaurants with bars are permitted within the Specialty Commercial (SC) Development District with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (Development Code Table 17.30.030-1). Modification of an approved Conditional Use Permit, including changes in the hours of operation, require that the project be reviewed and approved by the same approving authority as the original permit (Development Code Section 17.14.100). The existing business is in accordance with General Plan Policy LU -1.3 which encourages commercial centers to provide a broad range of retail and service needs for the community. The project site is in conformance with the Development Code as it relates to parking, setbacks, height, etc. b. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The existing business occupies a building that is in conformance with the Development Code as it relates to parking, setbacks, height, etc., and conditions of approval have been imposed to ensure that the use will comply with the Performance Standards set forth in Section 17.66.050 of the Development Code and will not create adverse impacts upon adjacent uses. C. Granting the modification would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Conditions have been imposed to ensure the proper service of alcohol to patrons, and the building complies with all applicable Fire and Building Codes. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section15301 - Existing Facilities. Because the project only involves expanding the hours of operation to open earlier, staff concludes that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. . Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Department 1) Approval is hereby granted to expand the hours of operation as stated in Condition of Approval No. 3 to open at 9:00 a.m., seven days per week, for the operation, sale and service of alcoholic beverages (i.e., beer, wine, and distilled spirits) in conjunction with a 7,597 square foot restaurant and bar with outdoor dining in the Specialty Commercial Item K-49 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-42 DRC2014-00774— SSRB GROUP, INC. September 24, 2014 Page 3 District of Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard District, located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue at 8916 Foothill Boulevard —APN: 0208-101-23. The restaurant use shall be a "bona fide eating place" as defined in California Business and Professions Code Section 23038. 2) All Conditions of Approval, except for hours of operation, related to Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 and Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 remain in effect. 3) The days and hours of operation shall be limited to Friday and Saturday: 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. and Sundays through Thursday: 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. 4) The Planning Commission will conduct a review of the business operations within 6 months of the date of this resolution to confirm the business is operating fully within the conditions set forth by the original Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 and this modification DRC2014-00774. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ray Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director I, Candyce Burnett, Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2014, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ® ABSENT: . COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item K-50 Sw^aoa' �,. L� RANCHO C'UCAMONGA SIGN -IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 NAME COMPANY ADDRESS/EMAIL Caf Co b ' 4e4igo. WORKSHOP Initial Study for Development Review DRC2014-00127 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 44 I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental eff cts would occur. r Applicants Signature: r Date: 9— 2 -2 - Print Name and Title: John R. Burroughs President Rev 2-26-13 Van der Zwaag, Tabe From: Hund, Geary <geary_hund@fws.gov> Sent Wednesday, September 24, 2014 9:57 AM To: Van der Zwaag, Tabe Subject: Re: Comments - MND General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012, Development Review DRC2014-00127 Dear Tabe, Please note that the first word in the title line should say for, not fro. Thank you, Geary On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Hund, Geary <.gea[y hund @fws.gov> wrote: In Reply Refer To: FW5-SB-13B0402-14CPA0415 Tabe Van Der Zwaa Assoicate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P.O. Box 807 Ranchaj Cu fnongai, CA 91729 September 24, 2014 Subject: Mitigated Negative Declaration fro General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012, Development Review DRC2014-00127 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126, City of Rancho" Cucaino.no.6 San Bernardinq County, California Dear Mr. Van Der ZViraa: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the subject Mitigated Negative Declaration (MNd) for the proposed general plan amendment, development review and zoning map amendment forAPNs 0229-401--06, 07, 08 and 09, dated August 20, 2014 and received by our office on August 21, 2014. The project is located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Service does not agree with the finding in Biological Resources Section 4a of the Initial Study for the project, Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. This finding was based on a Biological Technical Report dated July, 2013 which concluded that the project site does not contain desirable habitat for special status species. We do not agree with this finding because the site contains Delhi fine sands which are potentially suitable habitat for the federally listed Delhi sands Ower -loving fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis, DSF). Development of the site could result in adverse effects to DSF if present. In addition to the site containing Delhi fine sands, there are historic occurrence records of DSF within 2.8 miles. When a site contains potentially suitable habitat for DSF, i.e., Delhi fine sands, the Service considers two consecutive seasons of surveys for DSF with negative results to be necessary to determine presumptive absence. An exception may be made if a habitat assessment is conducted by a permitted DS. biologist which provides conclusive evidence to the Service that the site no longer contains potentially suitable habitat. We recommend that DSF surveys or a habitat assessment (if appropriate for the site) be conducted to determine if the project may affect the subspecies and that the results be provided to the Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office for our review. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the .MNQ. If you have any questions regarding this email, please contact me. Sincerely, Gearyj Gearyi W. Hund Fish and Wildlife Biologist 760-322-2070 x209 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Palm Springs Office 777 E. Ta:hquitz Canyon Way, Suite 208 Palm Springs, California 92262 Geary W. Hund Fish and Wildlife Biologist 760-322-2070 x209 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Palm Springs Office 777 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 208 Palm Springs, California 92262 lee cmd, a-0,11 STAFF REPORT �- PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: September 24, 2014 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (MODIFICATION) - DRC2014-00774 - SSRB GROUP, INC. A request to modify an approved Conditional Use Permit (DRC2012-00057) to increase the hours of operation in order to op r for an �} existing restaurant and bar (Sixty6 Sports Lounge) located at t e� t corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue within the Specialtrcial (SC) Development District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, Suite K1.. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit (Modification) DRC2014-00774, to extend the hours of operation of an existing restaurant and bar and schedule a 6 month review of the business operation to address concerns raised by the Police Department, through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single -Family Residential/ Offices - Low -Medium Residential/Office South - Commercial strip center and gas station — Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 2) East - Shopping Center - Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 2) West - Shopping Center - Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 2) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site — General Commercial North - Office, Low -Medium South - Community Commercial East - General Commercial West - General Commercial C. Project Background: The Planning Commission0,* nditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 and Entertainment Permit DRC201ly 12, 2012 to operate a restaurant and bar with live entertainment. The busn is a restaurant with a Type 47 alcohol license which permits full service of distilled spirits for on- site consumption. The restaurant is required to operate as a "bona fide eating place" as defined in the California Business and Professions Code Section 23028. The approved hours of operation are Sundays through Thursday from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and Friday and Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. The applicant is requesting to change the hours and open at 9:00 a.m., seven days a week. Per Development Code Section 17.16.120 and per the Conditions of Approval established for the original application i GON Z) r 7—/ a t/ Schrader, Lois. From: Van der Zwaag, Tabe Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 5:45 PM To: Schrader, Lois Subject: FW: From: Van der Zwaag, Tabe Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 5:44 PM To: Granger, Donald Subject: Prior to approval of a rough grading plan the applicant shall perform a DSF (Delhi sands flower -flowing fly) survey to determine whether the project may affect the DSF and the results shall be provided to the Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office for review. All mitigations measures recommended by the biologist and/or Department of Fish and Wildlife Service shall be fulfilled prior to permit issuance. I Sixty -Six Sports Lounge 8916 Foothill Blvd # K1 Rancho Cucamonga, CA Total Calls for service reference the location 06/01/13-09/24/14: 43 False alarm calls: 19 Murder: 1 Assault with a deadly weapon: 1 Fights: 3 ACT: 5 (3 separate occasions with bugs in their alcohol) C.U.P/EP: 6 Noise issues: 3 DUPs from location: Approximately 6 (not all information in the system yet) False alarm calls from Coffee Klatch since 66 opened: 6 Before 66 opened: 0 It has been documented that Sixty-six Sports Lounge is in violation of their conditional use permit/entertainment permit. *They have outside speakers -not allowed *Flashing lights- not allowed *All doors open during entertainment — must be closed *Refusal to post ABC and Business license -It took 3 inspections and a citation for not posting the business license before they would post it *Not using 7 security guards *Not posting necessary ABC signage (Cancer/pregnancy signs) *Not using ID scanner on entertainment nights Business and licensing issues reference admission tax; they are a month late on paying They owe $575 for audible alarm tax 05/24/14 Car show in the parking lot with alcohol, no TUP During World Cup Soccer, opened early without getting a TUP They have called in 4 times: Webster called once for a 415F and once for 415N Bobby called once for 415F and once for 487 Schrader, Lois From: Grahn, Tom Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 4:49 PM To: Burnett, Candyce; Schrader, Lois ' Subject: FW: DRC2014-00613 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged FYI - -Tom Grahn From: Putnam, Will [mailto:will.putnam@woodpartners.com] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 4:40 PM To: Grahn, Tom Subject: RE: DRC2014-00613 Hi Tom, I just left you a VM as well, but we will not be able to attend the pre -application workshop for the Foothill & Hermosa project this Wednesday. We are at an impasse with the Seller, and are no longer in contract. We will continue to work with the Seller to try and resurrect the project, but we not currently moving forward. Thank you for all your help, and I apologize for any inconvenience. We look forward to working with the City of Rancho on this project, or another in the future. Feel free to call or email me with further questions. Thanks Will Putnam Wood Partners 17771 Cowan I Suite 200 Irvine I CA 92614 C: 310-200-7351 willputnam@woodpartners.com Ilmproving People's Lives By Creating Better Communities From: Grahn, Tom [mailto:Tom.Grahn�cityofrc uSus] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 5:00 PM To: Putnam, Will Subject: DRC2014-00613 Will Can you provide me with a pdf of your submittal exhibits? If you have the previous versions that were provided to Candyce, that would help also. Thomas Grahn 1 RANCHO UCAMONGA vIUr.✓«IIINIUI Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450 Design Review DRC2013=00565 Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250 ��ro e,FG MMI FW 0 rF O F, RAND HO UC'.AMONGA CALIFORMA • Site Characteristics: Project Details • Located at northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street • Within the General Industrial Zoning District • Subject property is 13.23 acres in size • Project Characteristics: • Subdivision of one parcel into three parcels • Development of six industrial buildings totaling approximately 171,941 square feet • Incorporation of a Uniform Sign Program • California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines requires adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration RANCHO CUC'.AMONGA CALIFORNIA Proposed subdivision involves the creation of 3 parcels from one existing Parcel 1 — 2.13 Acres Parcel 2 — 4.82 Acres Parcel 3 — 5.89 Acres ad` � '�• - I I � � � —I—�—I r i PARCEL 2 r� ?— PA ICIEL 8 MAO —`` �, IIIIIIII . PARCEL t ...--- ......_... S 'I i . RAI�ICHO UCAMONGA CALIFORNIA Site Plan CEM9%� 14XSUML ww COON" M9039MAL Ac-, 17 4' - TI RANCHO CU(AMON(.;A . CALIFOP.NtA Phase One Construction of: • Building 6 • Eastern parking lot and landscaping • Remaining 7t" Street improvements and adjacent landscaping Phase Two Construction of: • Buildings 1 — 5 • Remaining parking lot and landscaping V� LI L YJ RANCHO CU(AMON(;A CALIFORNIA 170 • Concrete Tilt -Up Construction • Smooth & Sandblasted finish • Glass Storefronts with Anodized Aluminum Mullions • Recessed Entrances • Metal Roll -Up Doors • Decorative 2 -inch Reveal Lines Building Elevations - H ir L mud�rrrhrtr.��� ��®� =NEW-,p� loon Wort -1100 04, A-5.6 RANCHO UNIFORM TCAMON(ASite Plan ,ALIFORNIA ............. Guidelines Pg•4..,, UNIFORM S,g,, I•...,..... .. SCHEU BUSINESS CENTER mmmomf LlxfxO lOUTgI A D. D D 4D D B UNIFORM Far III 11 . 7�rj Sign Exhibits Elevations (,Encore RA-NCHO UCAMONGA CALIFORNIA Environmental Assessment and Staff Recommendation • The City prepared an industrial development. • Based on the IS, with th has determined that the effect on the environment. Therefore, staff recommends: • Approval of: Initial Study (IS) for the proposed -11 included mitigation measures, staff project would not have a significant Tentative Parcel Map SU BTPM 19397, Design Review D RC2013-00565 & Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250 • Adoption of: Mitigated Negative Declaration General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 Design Review DRC2014-00127 L�-" f+" 1, 1 Project Proposal • Design Review of a 139,983 square foot industrial building on a 6.6 -acre site • General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning designation of the site from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) s �--�ciry o}' M RANCH O � CUCA �� L._..J C A L I F General Plan Amendment • IP does not permit warehouse/storage/distribution tenants over 50,000 square feet • GI permits warehouse/storage/distribution tenants over 50,000 square feet • Justification —The proposed project is in keeping with surrounding land uses and acts as buffer to the commercial land uses to the south F _ 3 AN Development Code • Complies with all Development Code requirements • Provides 360 degree architecture • Screens loading area with 8 -foot high wall and gates • Provides 104 Parking spaces, 4 in excess of minimum requirement 11 I t';44� City0f RANCH C U C A M Staff recommends the following actions: • That the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution approving Design Review DRC2014-00127 • That the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolutions recommending the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 -FI.- Sixty6 Sports Lounge CUP Modification D RC2014-00774 I.Vtm K Proposal • Extend hours -of -operation 2 hours per day to open earlier • Additional operating hours being requested for sporting events with early starting times • New hours -of -operation will be: Sunday — Thursday from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. -4 * a - - City of RANCH CUCAM C A L I F O Recommendation • Staff recommends that the Commission approve the request for the additional hours -of -operation with the requirement that the approval be reviewed within the next 6 months to ensure that the applicant successfully addresses the recent violations and adheres to the Conditions of Approval.