Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-01-28-Agenda Packet-PC-HPC THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF ;CHO CUcnmoNr,A THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 28, 2015 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER • Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Wimberly_ Vice Chairman Oaxaca Munoz_ Howdyshell_ Fletcher_ II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA C;RM4NCHO JANUARY 28, 20'15 Page 2 A. Approval of regular meeting minutes dated January 14, 2015 J= IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. B. TIME EXTENSION DRC2014-01076 - JASWINDERS AND LAKHBIR KAUR SONDH -A request to extend the expiration date of an approved Conditional Use Permit (DRC2009- 00308)for two years from February 10, 2015, to February 10, 2017, for the design, layout and operation of a proposed automatic car wash at an existing service station and convenience store located in the Community Commercial(CC)Development District of the Terra Vista Community Plan at 11768 Foothill Boulevard;APN: 1090-121-16.The Planning Commission determined that the project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (c) (Small Structures). Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no further environmental review is required as there are no changes to the project. C. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00620 - BENCHMARK COMMUNITIES - A request for the architectural and site plan review of 95 single-family homes located within the Low- Residential (L) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan adjacent to Indian Wells Place approximately 1,800 feet north of Day Creek Boulevard -APN: 1087-071-15. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226-2. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 88082915 and No. 98121091 certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001)and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report. D. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 - TRACY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC - A request to subdivide one existing 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels within the Equestrian Overlay of the Very Low(VL) Residential Zoning District located at the northeast corner of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane at 5615 Sapphire Street-APN: 1061-691-04.This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. E. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207-PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC-A request to construct 6 single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved 6-lot subdivision on 2.99 acres in the Low(L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 500 feet south of the Victoria Avenue. Related file:Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578;APN:022712133. On August 23, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA �� JANUARY 28, 2015 ONOA Page 3 2006, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2014-00915-AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC(AMC)- A request to establish alcoholic beverage sales(Type 47-On-Sale General for Bona Fide Public Eating Place) in conjunction with the existing Victoria Gardens AMC 12 Movie Theater, in the Mixed Use (MU) District of the Victoria Planned Community, located at 12600 North Mainstreet; APN: 109053105. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976 — CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES — A request to subdivide 3.2 acres of land in order to develop 31 detached residential condominiums for a site located on the east side of • Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street in the Medium (M) Development District - APN: 0207-262-01, 02 and 03. Related case: DRC2014-00570. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00570 — CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES—Site plan and architectural review of a 31-unit multi-family project on 3.2 acres of land located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street in the Medium (M) Development District-APN: 0207-262-01, 02 and 03. Related case: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18976. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966—MARC HOMES, LLC-A proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of 1.89 acre into eight(8)lots within the Low Medium(LM)Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way, located at 13025 Base Line Road - APN: 1100-011-02. Related files: Development Review DRC2014-00645 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645 - MARC HOMES, LLC - A proposal to construct eight (8) single-family residences in conjunction with a subdivision of a vacant parcel of 1.89 acre into eight (8) lots within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way, located at 13025 Base Line Road - APN: 1100-011-02. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 4 K. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00581 —MARC HOMES, LLC—A request to remove trees in conjunction with the subdivision of a vacant parcel of 1.89 acres into eight (8) lots and construction of eight(8)single-family residences in the Low Medium (LM)Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan,at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way, located at 13025 Base Line Road; APN: 1100-011-02. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014- 00567—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS-A proposal to amend the Development Code to permit the construction of buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet on select parcels located within the Industrial Park (IP) District - APN: 0210-371-02. Related files: Development Review DRC2014-00566 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566 — TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS-A proposal to construct an industrial building of about 116,480 square feet on a parcel of about 249,000 square feet(5.72 acres)within the Industrial Park (IP) District, located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue - APN: 0210-371-02. Related files: Development Code Amendment DRC2014- 00567 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. N. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00845—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS— A request to remove trees in conjunction with the construction of an industrial building of about 116,480 square feet on a parcel of about 249,000 square feet(5.72 acres)within the Industrial Park (IP) District, located at 10220 4th Street.about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue - APN: 0210-371-02. Related files: Development Code Amendment DRC2014- 00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. V. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION O. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES P. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS ® HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Ho JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 5 VI. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee,hereby certify that a true,accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 22,2015,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC O TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 • a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. t inHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA C JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 6 APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. VicinityMap Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting January 28 , 2015 U11 I J K IC .�.. .._ _.v._.. r _E .0 -0 I t € m • CL C o i 19*t� i Base Line Base Line I Church Church Foothill Foothill N c Arrow E to �Arrow c J mey t c 8th w ! a __jQ. 6th 6th w G, H 4th _ _ 4th 7t Meeting Location: L, M, N EKf FFT City Hall/Councll Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive a THE CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MINUTES OF �ANCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 14, 2015 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California F• 7� I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 PM Roll Call Chairman Wimberly A Vice Chairman Oaxaca A Munoz X Howdyshell X Fletcher X It was noted that the Chairman and Vice Chairman are absent. The Commissioners were asked if there was any objection to Commissioner Howdyshell taking the Chair for the purposes of conducting the meeting. All were in general agreement. Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City 10anager/Economic and Community Development; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney;Dan James, Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. SComments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain Item Al I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION /MINUTES AGENDA RANCHO `xAMoNCa JANUARY 14, 2015 Page 2 from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None EEI . CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Consideration of minutes dated December 10, 2014 B. VACATION V-227 TREE RANCHO, LLC—A request to vacate vehicular access rights for two existing driveways on the north side of 41"Street, east of Hermosa Avenue along Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 5239 —APN: 210-371-02 Moved by Fletcher seconded by Munoz, to adopt the Consent Calendar as presented. Carried 3-0-2 (Wimberly, Oaxaca absent) IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. C. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DRC2013-00789-ROUTE 66 IECA-A request to preserve the historic Cucamonga Service Station including review of the"Richfield"signage and paint scheme for the front building (Phase 1), restoration of the front building and related site improvements (Phase 2)and to reconstruct the rear 2,391 square foot service garage (Phase 3)within the Foothill Boulevard Specialty Commercial(SC)District, located at 9670 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 020815305. This review includes Phase 1 only. Mayuko Nakaiima, Assistant Planner, gave the staff report and a^ brief PowerPoint presentation. She noted that the applicant tested swatches of the paint color "Station Yellow"and it was found to be too intense and therefore a softer yellow will be used. Anthonyonzalez President of /ECA Route 66 stated there are man; individuals it . y , attendance that contributed their time and .materials for the project at no cost to the City. He said they are pleased and happy that the City has supported their efforts. Joe Ramos; projeci architect; commentt Item A2 the station looked like previously and PHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES P.ANCHOAGENDA CUCAMONGA JANUARY 14, 2015 Page 3 how it looks today. He thanked Mayuko Nakajima for her excellent staff report and assistance. He shared historical photos of the station. He said much has been donated to benefit the station including two cars. He said they hope for approval of the colors and the sign so they can open by July 95th; the 100 year anniversary of the station. He said they need different access in order to build the future permanent restrooms-temporary restrooms will be in place until that time. Commissioner Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Luana Hernandez, 6797 Hellman Avenue said she is honored to be here and said it is so wonderful to see how many came to help with this and for staffs help and guidance. Commissioner Munoz thanked the group for many years of effort. He said he likes the plan • and the phasing and the historic paint job and the fact that people got involved. He thanked the public and noted the Commission appreciates what they are doing. Commissioner Fletcher said this is encouraging and the City appreciates the efforts of citizens and it was saved and got historic designation. He said it makes a lot of sense to use the original paint scheme and to preserve the character of the building. Commissioner Howdyshell echoed the comments and commended the partnership and the trades that donated time, expertise and materials. She said it is significant that the sign was donated; another piece of evidence this project is important to our City. She noted that the remodeling has to be in phases with a master plan. She said she is enjoying seeing the changes as she drives by. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carried 3-0-2 (Wimberly. Oaxaca absent) to approve Historic Preservation Resolution No 15-01. V. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION D. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES None E. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS • None VI. ADJOURNMENT Item A3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AGENDA HO ;ONG& JANUARY 14, 2015 Page 4 THE COMMISSION IMMEDIA TEL YADJOURNED TO A WORKSHOP HELD IN THE RAINS ROOM AT 7:25 PM TO DISCUSS PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-01052— JEC ENTERPRISES, INC. 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 8, 2015, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for J scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each aqenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Ce; Item A4 tancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These PHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES P.ANCHO JANUARY 14, 2015 CUCAMONCA Page 5 documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at wv+rw.CityofRC.us THIS HIGHLIGHTED SECTION MAY BE REMOVED WHEN PREPARING THE ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES. • i Item A5 STAFF REPORT ' P'LANNINGDEPARTMENT Date: January 28, 2015 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C;UCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Subject: TIME. EXTENSION DRC2014-01076 - JASWINDERS AND LAKHBIR KAUR SONDH - A request to extend the expiration date of an approved Conditional Use Permit (DRC2009- 00308) for two years from February 10, 2015, to February 10, 2017, for the design, layout and operation of a proposed automatic car wash at an existing service station and convenience store located in the Community Commercial (CC) Development District of the Terra Vista Community Plan at 11768 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 1090-1.21-16. The Planning Commission determined that the project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (c) (Small Structures). Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no further environmental review is required as there are no changes to the project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of Time Extension DRC2014-01076 for a two 2 year time extension of Conditional Use Permit DRC2009-00308 through the adoption of the Resolution of Approval with conditions. ANALYSIS: A. General: On December 2, 2014, the applicant, Jaswinders and Lakhbir Kaur Sondh, submitted a request to extend the expiration date of Conditional Use Permit DRC2009-00308. The applicant recently purchased the project site and is in the process of producing the construction drawings for the project and plans on submitting to the Building Department within the next 6 months. The applicant does not propose any changes to the project (Exhibit A). The project was originally reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on February 10, 2010 (Exhibits B and C). Resolution of Approval No. 10-03 for Conditional Use Permit DRC2009-00308 states that the approval of the project is set to expire if Building Permits are not issued or the approved use has not commenced within five (5) years from the date of approval, which translates into,an expiration date of February 10, 2015. Per Section 17.14.090 (C), of the Development Code, "(a)n application for extension shall be filed not less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the permit, along with appropriate fees and application submittal materials." The applicant submitted a written time extension request on December 2, 2014, within the permitted time period. Development Code Section 17.14.090(C) states the initial time extension request may be granted for up to two (2) years from the original expiration date. An additional one (1) year time extension may be requested prior to the expiration • of the two (2) year time extension. Time extension requests are subject to the review and approval by the same authority that approved the original project, which in this case is the Planning Commission. Item B-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT " DRC2014-010176—JASWINDERS AND LAKHBIR KAUR SONDH JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 2 B. Code Consistency: The project is in conformance with the current Terra Vista Community Plan and Development Code and no changes to the approved project are proposed. C. Design Review Committee: The original project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, Granger and Nicholson) .on January 5, 2010. The applicant does not propose any changes to the project in conjunction with this time extension request; no further action by the DRC is necessary. D. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (°CEQA') and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission determined that the original project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (c) (New Construction) in connection with the City's approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2009-00308. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No changes are proposed.to the project; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental. impacts; and no new important information shows that the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered. There are no changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those. evaluated when concluding the project was categorically exempt. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not analyzed in the previous environmental review, and will not have more severe effects than previously analyzed. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners Within .a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received. Respectfully submitted, Canda4vrne Planning Director CB:TV/Is _ -- Attachments: Exhibit A - Time Extension Request Letter(prepared by the applicant) Exhibit B - Staff Report (with attachments) for Conditional Use Permit DRC2009- 00308, dated February 10, 2010 Exhibit C - Resolution of Approval No. 10-03 for Conditional Use Permit DRC2009- 00308 Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2014-01076 Item B-2 0 December 1, 2014 Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Property located @ 11678 Foothill Blvd CUP No. DRC2009-00308 To Whom It May Concern, Pursuant to section 17.14.090 of the Development Code, I would like to request an extension for the above referenced conditional use permit. I would like to move forward with this approved improvement to the existing service station. I am in the process of completing the construction documents to submit to the City's building department and need this extension to allow for ample time for plan check and subsequent inspections. Please feel free to contact me @ 626.224.4636 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Jesse Sondh EXHIBIT A — Item B-3 STAFF REPORT - - PLANNING DEP.�RTRIENT • RANCHO DATE: February 10, 2010 CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2009-00308 - INO CRUZ (for ARCO): A proposal to construct an automatic car wash, relocate an existing trash enclosure, and relocate a previously approved Healy Tank at an existing ARCO gas service station and convenience store in the Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista Planned Community (TVPC), located at 11768 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0227-151-41. Related file: Conditional Use Permit CUP96-14. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - as the proposed structure is-less-than 2,500 square feet in floor area. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Site - Gas Station/Convenience Store — Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista Planned Community(TVPC) North - Vacant— Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista Planned Community(NPC) South - Jack in the Box— Industrial Park (IP) District (Subarea 7) East - Multi-tenant Retail — Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista Planned Community(NPC) West - Carl's Jr: /Green Burrito - Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista Planned Community(TVPC) General Plan Designations: Site - General Commercial North - General Commercial South - General Commercial East - General Commercial .West - General Commercial Site Characteristics: The subject property is a parcel located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Masi Drive with an area of approximately The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 200 feet (ast1to est) by a ( roxi aacrey 217 feet (north-to-south) (Exhibit B and C). The site is fully developed with a gas station/convenience store operated by ARCO that was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on August 14, 1996, (Conditional Use Permit 96-14, Exhibit 1). An overhead EXHIBIT B Item B-4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2009-00308—ARCO February 10, 2010 Page 2 fueling canopy, landscaping, and parking areas are present. To the west.of the site is a fast food restaurant (Carl's Jr. /Green Burrito) and to the east are two (2) retail buildings. To the south is the 26-acre Masi commercial center. To the north it is vacant. The zoning of the property and the surrounding properties to the west, north, and east is Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista Planned Community (NPC). The zoning of the properties to the south is Industrial Park (IP) District (Subarea 7). A shared drive aisle along the north side of the property provides access to the site. ANALYSIS: General: The applicant proposes to construct an automated self-service carwash of approximately 1,000 square feet. The carwash will be generally located at the northeast comer of the site along the east property line (Exhibit E and F). The primary axis of the carwash will be north south with the entrance and exit on the south and north sides, respectively. To ensure safe exiting of the carwash, a space of approximately 18 feet deep has been provided between the carwash and the drive aisle to the north that will allow a vehicle to pause before proceeding into the drive aisle. Included in the proposal is the construction of a drive aisle directing vehicles to the carwash, demolition of the existing trash enclosure and construction of a new trash enclosure, and relocation of a recently approved outdoor Healy Tank Enhanced Vapor Recovery (EVR) system to the interior of the carwash building (Minor Development Review DRC2008-00979). Existing parking stalls will be relocated; parking stalls are not required for the carwash building. The architecture of the carwash building will match the design and general appearance of the existing gas station/convenience store and include matching finish, colors, trim, and materials. No revisions to the existing building are proposed. As the building will have a zero setback along the east property line, the applicant has obtained a letter from the adjacent property owner to the east acknowledging and permitting the applicant to enter their property to construct the car wash and conduct long term maintenance of the building (Exhibit Q. Floor/Area Analysis: Per Chapter III, Section 2.5.3.8 of the General Plan, the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR).in the General Commercial (GC) land use category is 35 percent. The net area of the project site is 49,110 square feet. Following the completion of the new car wash, the combined building coverage will be 10,558 square feet. Therefore, the floor area ratio for this site will be 21.5 percent. Description of Operations: The existing gas station and convenience store operates 24 hours a day, 7 days_a_week.with 3 employees working in 2 shifts. The new carwash will operate during the same time period. No new employees are required as the car wash is fully automated (Exhibit K). Like similar automated car washes, customers will purchase a car wash service either at one of the gas pumps while refueling or at a kiosk that will be located at the entrance to the car wash. The duration of each car wash is about 5 to 10 minutes. Land Use Compatibility: The project will be consistent with the site's development district and the surrounding development districts. Car washes are consistent with the type of service provided at gas stations. The car wash service proposed is similar to the existing car wash located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Masi Drive. To ensure any aesthetic impact to the Item B-5 . �� --.-A f•41h PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2009-00308—ARCO February 10, 2010 • Page 3 neighboring commercial businesses to the east is minimized, a 6-foot high by 32-foot long screen wall will be constructed along the east property line that will extend from the southeast corner of the car wash building and continue south and terminate near the northeast corner of the existing retail building. Disturbance to any residents living in the area will be very minimal or non-existent as the nearest residential district/use is a single-family residential neighborhood located approximately 1,000 feet to the north at the north side of Malaga Drive, west of Rochester Avenue. Staff notes that the intermediate properties between the project site and these residences are partially vacant. However, as they are zoned for commercial use, it is anticipated that at a future date, there will be additional buildings constructed that will buffer these sensitive receptors from the proposed use. Desiqn Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, Granger, and Nicholson) on January 5, 2010. The Committee reviewed Staffs comments and- accepted staffs conditions and recommendation of approval. The Committee had additional Conditions of Approval including using polyvinyl chloride (PVC) instead of wood for the overhead trellis at the car wash for durability and the addition of a screen wall along the south side of the drive aisle to screen the entrance of the car wash. The applicant agreed to all of the Conditions of approval which have been included in the attached draft Resolution of Approval. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - as the proposed car wash is-less- than 2,500 square feet in floor area and will function as an appurtenant structure to the existing gas station. The automated car wash will not intensify the existing use and will not create an environmental impact. There will be no expansion of the floor area of the existing building. With the exception of revised landscaping, no significant changes to the site such as relocated vehicle access points, mass grading, or-substantial removal/addition of paved areas, etc., are proposed. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2009-00308 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, Jam R. Troyer,AICP Planning Director • JT:MS1ds Item B-6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2009-00308—ARCO February 10, 2010 Page 4 Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Map Exhibit C - Existing Site and Demolition Plan Exhibit D - Grading Plan Exhibit E - Proposed Site Plan with New Carwash Building Exhibit F - Detail Site Plan Exhibit G - Roof Plan Exhibit H - Elevations Exhibit l - Staff Report for Conditional Use Permit 96-14(excerpt) Exhibit J - Design Review Committee Action Comments, dated January 5, 2010 Exhibit K - Correspondence from the applicant Exhibit L - Correspondence from the Adjacent Property Owner. Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2009-00308 Item B-7 _�•Y91YRfeR Ci xtl f" . e I pnRrc � $ill e,l it q �J Ay tt �+ mrcr W II�UMMRRAVE IL!9ANYpN ST vmn s •�. _ `��„s✓jg�°a'9—ti-lla iI.p�rr�...�;7y �1,�R�arry�r,�.'�.lL''syl". j�� nu[sr IeR1I A_R1.e �o(2- --,d_[I_l ijI ..J�I��Rs<;7' aa'y��:P�cnm►°xt.II3ac �rI sLwc NERnip aTE/YAN got— RE, C,leik CARYN � 1—01 1 'N ., -- J, .IelaR i vom tr I IfI z - �/ Rax "` I r u F'J- ,�i PQB2Se n� °4�u3C'+a'^ i 4 � j , W�,�IJI `Ik�J � '/ �IEBI0GLN11iF1YFa I� I rRrCt rPeCP I Y11aF110 I V xpereM � p� . *v- I T r •. .a HIDNIAND AVE , 7C �� ii 4 z R Y � � alcwomri. "",r"""te r 0.Txa O PAP rAM15R pa 'Q, I Ik,� F _ 'SpMmu cr R .RANCHO Zr w ILTOAAC. awt,'" \ ?--; 7RncrRLr d ._� :•_. `n Q RO I u l �:• s t IYWDRD � Los ET IWANDA pr •; , '• ;. .. o I` ] WD7tOW5 II( �I F�¢_ �.,r— .,ARK..•: p"tMM51 Jly r1 uRRfluSf s ul i,! 'e : rmRs aiL>7 A ' 'I� w, I I IJT GEQ I 1 1 VAf[AC6 1radn ■ " y '4�� mH —� I EWANDA � ETV ANDA.Iwae1 < xmR GAHOC7CAMON9_cowEaII,1ID3 71b svn P.LAdTM _ �B�6 . GRAa I t . I. Fro ➢ 3Q awa I •I rRAW11M R Station 9 aws ox ---•-' a sxo�oriV"xR xr R ASI + m! OR C IF 111 Irsem LIE`OYO:[R Ri AMW p \ =ANYON 1 '� NDSLIMA=__ � TERRA' PROJECT SITE 'Dank I , Rmm6Qpr _� �.. �\ •'Da IL = r IxaRr R raRs11 FL I1 9 . 'aARlmE1` a CHURCHST . .� .,E I�y�d hs tsrolew i wrxNA,VA 57, wr II GREENWA` MILLKPN \\' Hj cUUoaartxRacx... PAM I PAW, � r I VICTOR/;`GARDENS I � CW.Y "MYOI NOM sr. N I s Y.M.C.A. ,rJQ` t ° I . SrtvRyfD_ RDYfNINw., cR P•t 'IRR9R RRr \ Ivra�us Sri lRxLWPARK sr -9� '-I,p i cIRwERR RANCHO 4YOU, OSANAMOI/O .5 n I� yx:rDRIA s i ¢ MEDICAL 1 CENTER HISTORIC Focrou vR 66 FOOTHILL EILV I iL ,SE ANWAY aowAvE ''ll WAUM Y a\1 y r•xruay� Dom-- Faorrau AFAR.... `I _ vrxl Yt ch DR ,;.... RANCTiO::. � _..... . - OX CIJCAIYI —.._.... ...._-- a �. ADULTS ANIMAL• ' sm I ■SHELTER �il— j3 rzmRi� �If ARROW ROUTE TPCDNIADN i j(T yi ----c i[ mIl D II p II �I �h __JE95EY ( � o om = WHITMAN AV �l aa;rotion rt� O I--- ' lAetrolink � j '. Station 0 .� r/rr.!!�'�9r �9 ,iI oAv-r�msr� 'I I� PNAP v a SIL � I THS I �r II ml /47 f'C aioI EXHIBIT Q —►� I Item B-8 W • • v , wry y - ' - � ' 1 • 11 f : �c x9 5 Foothill Blvd v w will 14 a � I ITI X _________ Q I SIIE , IWNNL\q _U51 `_______ ---� _ 1 1 I I �tts�� �• •.,.:n I1 �-warn t t+s:.a rrnn .. �' � � ro.•v+[w.:t+ ro.sn[w+wt+ o; ., --------� PCL 4 n t I I PLI{14022 E BK lAO PG 19 22 ensl.u[ws.et[" DMO IfION NOi S t of .. �r — � •.rsnc.e".nuu o[uo[rs.:�.u.wc[.,s..ius•[..ttos.+[ of t s... O mac.rc ns•..[.s �I} 1 2� �NEM�vL[net.t9E( tlON I [a. Ell.. ti—.01+e —.01,a _ L r"s_ I-1—— p.tL«.tt n,et [�..eta 9:31.-E•(A— � I ; ; [0.;03 :•J;= tWTNe:...eN[L� nKt Eccw+ .. acs a. O o- �eaaa K[i�si[re.ralr p i � 9 , nrst.sa.u. I I t < 89srt, itai� us1 ucsw[ Lnst�.osat[ t_____________ � J.ZS s,[w ntmw e•c.nw rmwrt+ I C -• [+st. N87500[SY_IBiJ2.E4Ee�41Sliti.�{.�:'•,:.1 %r.-.:F ur '—. .� FOOTHILL BLVD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEMOLITION PLAN FOR CARWASH _r _—_ _ -—_ —-— A HO GAS AND NEC CL` R- ! RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA N p �t eteew [.a.:t[.e eLtata•L•eta r wen i4 —M ��w1OLutovM1 wwC Qe.NN rwtlI-V 1[•MI[Iq 14Q y-MY ttN[e nGMC SGIG."�]0 • l It+tlnlrC W NMwf lwiNl+Y[It4t[eR at� CN[LL[0 eU\� IM1[M S. 4, y :'-;��,`:ij 1 / '(/!`/r�,.�..,;• e�..awl. ---- 1 �, �/ / 11We1 l.,[. '•ti�{� YP^`.. '.� � �' K Kra ESE � ^ FAST PCL 4 PM 14022/ /i ".',. .+wroil I "kBK ISO PG 19}/yam ..°6 "4x`, . ggot ••` ��.\, 1 + Y•y��rY/ � y 1•l:.L_ ti i'l:L. ,S' 1 I II �I � �UI��\\\ •... ......_, 1 ,.. ......... \ 7ja ,. I.K Mlwwl � I aw , . I I 1 1 7-ram 8 1 '• 1 1 1 v 1 L O b LI+SI.LAND KI . .._.. ■11Ri7777011K YYAI17171le 1 ....._ 173•- tmLlaAtwAr[ -,�y'' •�^ .. ^ -+�' _ ..- ip lwWli IIO iQ NI00II]OIY. INO M OOfOI CN0O1 WwR M OILLI ., ......_...-_...__....:._........._....`S•:��...... ._ � .,..._-_.___�-�...__ ._. ... .. .._._..____ �' i .......... YIIIOa 107 RY611w1wMmIlML1oL OWq ROIOOWmq Hd10NM �W'+� �-- - RwYi 16 GMIIMOR YMw16 M ICwf mlIM1L1.VO Rqw � • �__. —_ .._..____.-�__..-._..__. .__ lIQ KIII M QYmI W aR10rr[ +d®1 MII611w11f C�YI R Yw[�w R �4' ��' �,-- .-- M m.t OtlY�imOi®JIw10l O�RMllwllWs GO+150 R dY6w[fall FOOTHILL BLVD n/al/w CITY OF RANCHO.000AMONGA ONCEPTUAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE FOR CARWASH ARCO GAS STATION NEC FOOTHILL BLVD A MASI DR. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA N y IwL,AVW/014/ 91 Nn 7 .[[OYYm 70 0 7o w a• s .aa EIA li cO�+m wr"aOW rLi•im aucr GOP=fGw 1-.70' 4 WAM I M f1fOm001MO YwR OEOIpR OOEp.. OR omw"I10. mi w_ — w17 fu. x � _ Q ___ ____________________ _ ' ' -----I --------_ NERAL NOTES _ V T _ GENmewl sN I � aluosnmo n6r Rao vY.vsaslacawe `. O SITE INFORMATION " I ! II IY 1[mrl ab fi r .� ARCO \ ��\ erW OgppY Ari rd lW'JAW'. e sLZ& ASSISI w�a ;• R 4C ��Y.vmvm�o6` s�mwiao Rn.mmwn ma �o ^�R ®ec I,en OYYr ALLIa i 1 h I ,6R O r7R Ij' "MOWNOsvr essm son. $� NAMADAMARAR, IAN a. 8 a. f gVCR evCIA avl s r AALLamAzukm j I [yYp4� RlC il30 PG ie�", [• wi _ ; r ra[evls wan S10a w `SSSS / •" LEGALMI6a� ....... iI /�.•. [ [ranro Ir.say. .voo Y e MRRD I.. a sra[ I � �� sw `� ;•.._"' '/ .'1 a�mool as a to waa slo.1twev wom P,Yao��•u li r-r I t 1[Y M. m 1 1 loll.sw[YYe _.. rp[o KEYNOTES - j I omino ' 1 yy� WW FAMM 'J.- al y� r OBY MO MRm YMeo.. I � Iy Q I I g r�, ( 1 1� 1 �I -- • o.r�o.��lm mon moos.0 , I i I L._I A Ya.o Y:Ittr. I I erf Y A e oa wm.w,fim a6 oYn I I jy I 1 1 ti ® I _ _,_ . nrr lolmacr mom lum 6u .._........._.._......._........----._..1 1 rc i 1 I •�` F1R1 SfiIYY. 1 ill-cuR I _._.-----___ is-it � IN r I I _ __[�_1q_�_�r_5_____________ IR iEKgr ��i -1-� K.6 ----•-"--' `� Yd PY ru—ci1M PC(Yf1: FW - --- - -- _ TRFF LF OfiY p( IS' c— ---'-' ..__....... DESRIPTION OF CURRENT OPERATIONS AAA'-_ -' ,•'- omlc rwoo¢nna qfi Imso mol .. �� �vat sla[ylooe6r l0Yfififim fiowEm Mani Na Rs 6a FMB71N0 AWPY In®aaa a a n noya w nY . } � tort OACSO00.pg7ap fiEle/ SOUTH COAST 64 LP FOOTHILL BLVDcull fi LEGAL DESCRIPTION ARM=. g rens,a man..inlYn.r K rn er ow mwYe,m.,d sic..axaee w fianoq sm[4 wasw Y ION YV■mYY a fila Yfi llm n e ppOl•IO � H8;1'yO a'w Yloa a+fir ms[o m m.n®o m mon E -—-—._...----—------'--- VICINITY MAP � OOOA00 z ARCHITECTURAL e d d d SITE PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE Ir=20'-o- N ARCHTECTURAL&Te PLAN I AMS1'1 �{ Ml f16n\O� GENERAL NOTEB " 11 ••��\S>,i G;l�"F��pem:i a s,�.a Ilple �`•J2 �� '\ 11 � �s>_ •.� l _ ` FD. SPP & WASHER SuIT°EaINFORMATIONleFOaRNATION `I -ner. O • �-' FC. Sr"K a,coWr ARC o Him— a a lraau llel wr=f Cr�I�� AC ACCESS DRIVE W�m.err m.00a mm,Wq WtI Rl.W m.rm w 9d� r,rq.� - ^ u`• , Irly®meWI1WIWl wl6.tl etr eWlWMp mwa fqJ ^a �^ ". �/ n....` .,:a �� 9� as C. I�AV.I� NT `-i' D -i Wa"w D�G Woe eum sm -3 < / f'f , GlOpleO OW WWI Nlm son "j O ' r S�, c (i AREA` 1WlWWL Opy ' ` W IoIA lease+eYl.ql.w EUELI rxlsnNc 1e"� Trim. / , W Clo ea WWl l-e le EN Q C p 0 .®a IaI1a10Q Woe nywala�a llWl.w ^.` �,� ^ • :�� M1- ° in �/ a 104T• — GIeiWWa[mw°1� 6leelDe�nfl-a n ... ..� �. .° - ®•Y / Eh r- » Imla IIIIWW vWa RpYpm t1 10 0 n • r • �� KEYNOTER , •••1�t '``\ r' ^ � 1 mm rer Vella WR Os10�a[lW♦W WM' •••_••` $a rY / <I� j I W e own MIW Me6OOTOWI YOIaW)re . i Ddaal®YO as WO rWrq `1\.•K � -- . collo ales m®w W a maelm rr W06WaD W o mama T maWWamtImmumel \•'%�k — EXISTING 18"0 TREE a moW mo tae W aw �° W 1 Wl 11Ia1WI1W MW®a W ♦ \`�' � \\\ `'Jco Q C \ ` \ meo molRewWWmem'\ m OdaW 111r®e rp i W a W1aBm NIi IIY� C01-Y1,I L\\ (-)�� _� Il !•mmWa.eraaWrraa01a1._6111r•WNq JrJ la oWWINW9aWQ Ipmv011 qN W 14O4almlr ler M-sa em ml EXISTING 18"0 'TREE \• \ . - (: to I�mu a Weer oma \ \ •Wa k Le teem W W Wpm C' AC r /. —,/ . v I m W�e111OM tWRo®ewmnaaeoao •NEW CAR OreWalseeM+nemeu mBtINW ..r ,.__—_ / e I L 0®rm1eW oa 111s aolom I 11 O NOYe MOA I....._.j _l- �, U' W » o sm uw tW an aealot DRCMDb*0 GB I EXISTING ,�a:gym rlremo ?= e 11 z. I' 7XISTING 181'0 TREE' BUILDING 1e v�°"m°10 Wmw ._soma J u O- LEGAL DESCRIPTION IOR.V IRW N M111t6110[@/a elle0 eaeaG mr0 e FAQ.WaoWW ea N W�ala Wla a alrlet r IWI IW rmWm. m IYaf M NU$CAP I — m 10 maala■xanassmalr®o,seW mml w F EA x l_i VICINITY MAP Y I RAINS � J f _ I e ooWam I ----- / 00SITE PLAN .....-.................... _...... -- ......_ D IF *N \ I ENLARGED SITE PLAN ,`A°� ASI A ® I d I llyyi � � Il II � f II 1i , I 17 I = II II II �I �I I II w, PG Aah EXHIBIT G Item B-14 "O cm-o=ILSU i73YIp •:Y - 9 �q d 6° T' !J .i.t-K.2f rJ'MNOtl07 IO �Q .S.S 1fW"O'I i bR a 'Nor O E 0800000 11 090 00 Jy 1 ®•h ® I. I �G � �/•� �iv ii EXHIBIT H 'm Item B-15 CITY OF RANCHO - CUCONGA STAFF REPORT 01 y DATE: August 14, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, AICP,Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONALruct a 2,796 square USE PERMIT 96 14 A T LHw iQ RICHFI n CORPORATION -A request to const foot convenience market/gas station on a 1 A acre parcel within the-Terra Vista Promenade shopping center within the Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue-APN: 227-151-18. PROJECT AND SITED SCRIPTION: A. Sunoundina Land Use and Zoning; North - Home Improvement.Center(under construction); Community Commercial South - Retail/Recreational Center (under construction); Industrial Park (Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 7); East - Vacant; Community Commercial • West - Vacant Community Commercial B. General Plan Designations: Project Site- Community Commercial North - Community Commercial South Recreational Commercial East - Community Commercial West - Community Commercial C. Si#e Characteristics:The site is a rough-graded and hydroseeded vacant pad within the Terra Vista Promenade shopping center. Landscape improvements within the public right of way adjacent to the site have mostly been completed. The site slopes gently from north to south. D. Parking Calculations.- TypeNumber of Number of S F tae Spaces of U Square� Parkio Spaces -�_ Required Provided Service Station 3 + 2/bay 3 Retail 2 3 TOTAL ,796 1/250 12 12 15 15 ANAL SIS: A. Genera: The applicant is proposing to construct a 2,796 square foot service station with convenience store on a vacant pad within the Tena Vista Promenade shopping center. This is the first pad building to be processed within the project; the only other building in the center 'Pc ' p_C._ '`/'o EXHIBIT I - Item B-16 PLANNING COMMISSIO . AFF REPORT CUP 96-14 -ATLANTIC RI HFIELD CO. August 14, 1996 Page 2 is Home Depot, which is nearing completion at this time. The pump island area will have 6 two-sided pumps,typical of the newer Arco gas stations. The building has been oriented to screen a majority of the pump island area from view from Foothill Boulevard, and additional shrub massing along the street in front of the parking area will screen the parldng lot and pump area to an even greater extent. The general architectural concept(i.e., winery theme tower element, enhanced entry statement, trellises and colonnades, and material use) is consistent with the Terra Vista Promenade Design Guidelines for satellite buildings. B. Design Review Committee: On July 2, 1996, the Design Review Committee (McNeil, Lumpp, Fong) recommended revisions to the site plan and architecture. The revised plans were reviewed on a Consent Calendar..basis on July 16, 1996 and the Committee recommended approval of the project subject to conditions, which are contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. The Design Review Committee Action Comments have also been attached for. your convenience (Exhibit"G"). C. Technical Review Committee: On July 3, 1996, the Technical Review Committee reviewed the-project and determined that, together with the recommended special and standard Conditions of Approval,the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. The project.was conceptually approved by the Grading Committee on July 2, 1996. D. Environmental Assessmen Staff has completed Part 11 of the Initial Study(Exhibit"H"). Staff determined that the project could not have any additional adverse negative impacts on the environment than were already considered with the Master Plan development of the Terra Vista Promenade shopping center, where this pad was specifically shown as a service station. If the Planning Commission concurs with staffs recommendations,then issuance of a negative declaration would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices sent to allro a 300-foot radius of the site. P party owners within RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 96-14 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Res s b Bra er Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A"- Vicinity Map Exhibit"B"- Master Plan Exhibit"C"- Site Plan Exhibit"D"- Landscape Plan Exhibit"E"- Grading Plan Exhibit "F"- Building Elevations Exhibit "G"- Design Review Committee Action Comments Exhibit "H"- Initial Study, Part II Resolution of Approval with Conditions e -17 R VET!L14 I I .r •, � 1 � I� IO.Y , `.1` I I WIIDYIGNWY �. 1 �_..�.. / `1 , n1"'Mal' unl ,�1•I.r�"'1 '� `��l utlww.e�� \�..__.. -- ••_�..� ou. , T14E IIOME DEPOr Q 11txtl{IUOA mfw wt.lf• .1w1• �_ �� C.. _—�-. - .1\I I .na.c�=w lei ua• 1' IUR AIAlOR MA10R //1 Iry ' .• .u.cel MAJOR MMEMIA W lJ a{r l u nau r MAJOR MWOR s w r7 V A)t Vvsu r "AM d �.�r , 11 -ZC' W1 ac n G 'I Van '� ` /Il �I - n:..-- I �f et- will c I , IIIII111111�' =I TI , �. :I 1.-•� ' _ ,1 ..1yy4 1 � _ •,1 - _w�._w ... oc1 c WI U OI ILIIIII II.\lit 1 i- —'-- --- -- -. �i• � �Ir r�•l��'7 (lfll� �I •��-• . 1--. .r�Illllllll101- I I J 11 l61J• I►0q) I.. r -—) �Mn+7 I Iilll�Illjlllllllllllll� 111 A r A 1 I 11 i sppsyn ,wti� �1111L1n11 Illll�sj, x1 ^ (� II ° ♦171��' alAwd SITE PLAN 1 auw.1 I 1 U�Ininl:1111�h�ll awur W.owr " f ""' I 'SIAIA]N ucy VIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ' .,� r 11 I Jim_ �. C. � �II11111I111U e �'�``� �• .�-�« � Illlllllll• V Illy - •I��{� l•mf "� nlonor ) A FOOTHIII UOULEVARD WSIA/WyI►TW[ ..�.. - saw urmr RVOOIK.albd.{ (Afo{t (IOTA •.� Lcn I -{ — Vicinity Map I IYbewb ' t� 1 l4N.-E3ei. Mo>Ea��,,� O.,M1•.t t vnt.n N�•p�,w b 4Ko. Ut[t w'�E. Iltti►I p wON•x%� 1 �. O O O -'7.�••` rft�ii0 • mots.tt.tww. POJ 1 I `� ar/atel r•wa•n•.w r•+•.lfa. r .5 O �� I � ``p1,�...ta�1/uptuc�t(pmf�pltt o J7 •I ,1q�4 NC 1.1.10 p M Uoi•[.@ IA eM1l_ CQ. C Y s Mw�.." I �iilif ef1°•c ae 1 t 0YI m _VCOLOA7CIAL 1 1 I ••al•Wa 1.4 U."O.li01110 i U M.t 1 WC \ i ; I _ I,rw�..•.1. r,d A.1�: �.• Project Data om 1�• / ttII I �Iw �K•..••— Itq•.le•-r / Leyottwe.ltlt•.e1M•aelWp.. Al t�b..�.+...:,.w..•w..wua`•a.`.�n."."-.'.1•IM�.4+btt'i..a,wwt•�.Vc�'.�:Y��:..�rY-�..-..t.w.':+tw...r.�., n' �V`nZON10- L- COMMLIM N •.• / O d •Ywi.w.-r �i 1 I r �w�-`�r�l�n• t �mlas i�r_°r ae ti�t..:r w�a.N.+�. V O p ��aa w.w Iry WwN _a•n et s.rw '_'_ CC Y Cl) VOMI a tOwKeW a•• I 1 �I I N tl tl w law M11R M� ;�°.r�..N•t.•..r . MCY VIP-1• i t ii • IN t1A�Y 4W�OItIt 4,.w�Iik�/i rw, 1 I r � ��� b•.-.�we.b k ~ tan f uY• •O-t» O-O • e llO�ferf �letwn.�..rl.o........ea.In Q r•eroa0 tnplp Nom..ItW w.Ll•,~ Q dlYltdmltpl rt0 Ileola l,1•HO-P• d �• — 1 1 1•I 3 till JI'.f IA Jtiww@ a..•rwr •F.+.WI 1 I stmt ' t..r : W :a:.� I .1`..Ixenf '- ® e•J e� e � s a 1 daaCblam w�.:.-. �e� R Jp 1 Itwr.rr 4. Jt�Yta • � •-•. '^tmn 1•IKw I mtwlaw tq•Nt.------- ---- Ftme ,g ...... J:I t4 N•Wrr Iww,.at•In -- w go-~ e0iruel•Y n 1... •r OE y�>i/i Tj•i � � .. � �... .. ....�..: ,. .,.,. ...y--•.... .......... l/ ..tw �!L. 1 .../.. /J n.�.MII w•tttl `.�T.T;l .flll�l�rl! �.1.4»d..>a• c--+--- - J --- -— •-� ---------- — < -t - ------ _-- -- --Rl --- --1--- ---------------` •�....t...r Owi•.,.1.,..1_tl.t b -•— -- - —1--- "�— -- -----RMIO1II.I---------— -- I.ls »•I•.t .lma o -11. .'� .tbr.Hill van. u Ifw4 CY a ItQ wo•wl J1M•lmt�.Jt ,a O'� t�. . I Lt a 3 j f[C n,4ws•I.L; is tre.r.e dm•.waw to. wr•.n•V! Yi �.�.w•..�-4tt.an]•.a — �N tl.w �'d �of Ilatl w•t,N.. Foothill BOUleverd •• e • ,, Ilta tt1-tfw 4 w»••0tM wqua�mR a Nrrt �� / •.a•..tw• I � ort- .1„•.wt- �V 1■Jf Mom•[er1 w.1 M tw.1•.M /W b.�yl 4 � T Owl.w.w�tt,d wahba M.114 It trf0 L O i w,� y IMU wI_Ia. Ittq It.-t». 3�jU Z lata.ew•- i Q • .••r 1 z�COMML..t t QQ SEM—E. F- - M Z,*Y V I.+.�t.erJY ItaMYO•- ww�t _ __.--—- lal rr-a» �:Il:l.w' a uut &A Oq Conditional O ed to' OC nal Use Permit Site Plan ••� •• ,. . � • torn. w.w•w.•l.a1.1 tw�.,n••••vtn. MIIM ..14•t.~w ZONOJO- ���A „ Inn. wae.'r°.lwtK..•,.a.. tT�. -- aP•a.4.OK.ww�». aa a•w ta•wl.aarrr.!r•••t.tRW u.u.Ie wu4.en Inl,w•ia•wi•P i•a•r•r•..wa auc.o..w•a..r. �� COrAMlRa1T RCIAL lata r.-.1 NONTN YCK1 I,.J.ulc t••ul , UP-1 C::t 7 dbllVicinity Map 0 L 'Nor G 0 0 op k to J } e 0 gym U W m.. \. L I i BI•c�• «. �o`C Ii rf•�PI•Iq .o` ' 1 SI ii.v,.- TE9IPALM9 HE 1 (L C . I 1 —.e f..• _ O G tV �I I orQ 1•MOwt Ilr/1 ll�� rai�a•riiw°Ai loam PIRUS 'MISIVCRAf. U 0 ARISIOCNAI PFAR m d 0 a�Li iL ui+Ail to ra N Q O N 10 1.re+n Q '� m /Ae+ryrar r. • wO�p(,.�f y'^Cf� RHOS LANCIA AMICAN SUMN: Q ImL Y YI• I� yI,`_ m.�. Ir IY rGe't.' y�E,/a4 rMrD a acaVrr I PLAIANUS ACERVOLIA PLANE IRE[ m tvg I�ll1l Qm E /•a0s[0 uic.na 1 1 * (lf �dOn[•/0 1'INVS[ANA""ISIS CANARY ISIAIIII PINI' a PITT 4kc '1 � quq.��u•wyrq¢+p.�4iY:�wrimi.oa lerto • J I --__ f.IN!p.A. Ian 10 mlWl II� �A•�°•� O� PROPOS[° IREE/PALY By TIE S DCVELOPMENI E(. 11 • IOaI_11•A RUER f0 P1UNf(INI:PLANS Ur 'IANU LVIIUMN,l IU, a it '�-----Mm Iq mrrn q ' xt AW I l()COS PLUMUSA IAA.LN PAIM U ula MCr SFu:lIB9/O40VpIDCOVER N I 1 I— SCNEENiNG m NEOG1vI SMII AS: ADELIA CRANEvf LIMA GLOSSY'IAO[LIA KA 1 NMERNA DUYESI 1 „` .•� IIEAYEIIty IIAUUW 11 _ all ----�•l— -- ----- -- -- IRMEROCALLIS IVORIES _ ---_ _ LIRIOPE MUSCARI D Y Iu -•- --.�-.--_- -- -- _-- _- l0.f IIJNf - -,� - NANER/111 DIIMCSIKA WAVEHAJ ..---_-.---1-�-- _ __ -_-- _'-"-_.-.------ -I---- 011115 vECEIA ►ORINICI11 Or1AD00 PNORWUY IENA1 NEN ZEALAND FLAx PIIIOSPORVM IOBIRA rre.lg010•MOCK ORANGE _J •1 LI Yw/I l a/t J —•— ——NII��———-——————IL, `L /———— IRACIIILOSPCHMUN A51AlICVM ASMN JASMINE U nalnal a..l 1 ' ///,-111 I Yarsv,c Lam1.o.Ap1 oa -�.LLI SIREU12u RECIIAE O j NCMCROCALtIS IIIONIDS BI(ID tK PANAUISE 1E- i - -—I■-I,a I`L.. FOOlhlll BOUIBYBfd rtsluCA OvINA el,,„(,; ULVE ' iO Utu[f C:[uE d Ja� e > n ASUN G. Ora COVcCLOSSY ASELIAne: ASMMOIUES ANII SCUY ASIAN JASMINE A+q w0y1 RPNEfOPOSOO fPW+IN,PLANPAtM FITSLBY'LAND CONCERN.ELIO �U I �i!llfff qq ZCNNG-COAWJW COMMERC(A. Z z Q YJ ZONO- Cs.eloornditional Use Permit Landscape Plan 1 •� COeWU•EY C I',/" vw +••r .+ R-• w.a+Ia/a+.Y.r I•.w.w aR•v>em a/'"N1e 'm-t /q •I1>Qn n+a+.a++ae em.+Ie Tr1.+. plc IfNA Ioual IWIAQ.M•+m.4.•N•if.II•ro Acw.,In, rJlr ,mNL,o 1teO■Vn YDK1 RN o 1.VMS) NORTH +L o^a wcw ne..e�.m,•�. _ r+Tr UP-2 �1 /•..• l.+Is ✓JA••/.CWA.Al A LL 7th ••-y' � . RS All Ott loop- 0.1 � �•� —.. r..r. ••s• r f � Rq.u./C..ri •b-� ncNq MOP..... ��. rr,. v. Q,.,, `ixp'►'•'• 4,:•r�'ll�/�: C+N1 �,o \lam •� 1 —T� / - 2 M!•.a fi&. VV� / 'W • 1 / i _ __sail..__ SRC"0" •i4-A" �./IF�.. ��O O`� IfN W. •.'- 1f,1f '•1 Illi /� A 0 W to as at ppp`. .11 '�. ;i 1 del i• Z Iy rei•. -— 4 ♦l 1 I� 10 IL .' II I . As.s prw•/G+•l er �� Q m �� d' . h 1 Y ,It°�• as. .�. J jt W ~7~r J ;v � ' .` dry �l A....A�: / tl ` •li 1 � J SFC/ioA/ 6•B' ' 1 i i .1 -!..•r !•.r i -viva• -wu.un•nn•..•• d,.-- ♦ ; _\� ��1•�l �- •..-.-+�._ / � ..4..IL•N.A.•.y..d .«e.«mne.u• r.•«r«.«..n....e. � 1 31 LMA ti rw•i n n . ...rs. U ,�p E E 1 Iff &V ` 3 u - • /h..L.••. - - Z C V AA • AG Y•...• •.w •.r.r KENDRICK$ @ ASSOCIATES, INC. .`� YOK/ $•� 44u zn nf�y •r- .. A:..604.5; ROtD - air 1p E o \. 4 10 a j �m EXTERIOR ELEVATION lEAB1 FACPIOTEMA aarA PmanAOE EMRAWM Elevallon Key Plan 419 u- �1 1 1..®net•4 ee. 8I W W pT TaT X61,.Om dy O f1 q,•!-f OC Q s,`i'd•L• F n EXTERIOR ELEVATION (DOM FACMFOCTMIleW. w�ew TOWER ELEVATION cFACNo mtnM( �� i. e.lte•uelln ti,n[ lJJ pL1 VO ' e!1[ of ll,fie., �y ..•.4 TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION TRASH ENCLOSURE REAR ELEVATION ,,,,.[ a..n[.en a..<.e[K.,w�,,.,,ape .— ww TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION 7 wYOKI ft-on a raw[landio.aev.k.. +—wTiw Kat:1/f•1'-f UP-5 � 't SLSSL�FSLSf G:�t i� _ ___ _ • 1 MMM 1:1 11 Owl I�111111 „� �IIGII1 II ONES .• ! t s® �� � Ilio � . I: � ��� �. _ .i: .................... ilii iiiii o ���'1� �. 0 a.s Y 0 auOr " WPy aqr `' X` {�t0 q•oca Ea M.rasa wu+.. (L U ROOF PLAN CONT ELEVATION .wits ro wra § 7 qac U111! wall aam �' 7 —w^n.,er, —tee.ee.•n w+a �.ru+ ^'•w 1fi�0 �{ •tib OYI.Y..M. .•ww ruA. 6 AMO-dpm km-Wpl-ET ME YJ om-vo __ ... _., Canopy Floor PIer1 3,000$F • v.rn q+Mo n.tm{..r{......ywo{,r,,, -— +Arw '�• YDKI IP-e DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:40 p.m. Mike Smith January 5, 2010 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2009-00308 - INO CRUZ (for ARCO) - A proposal to construct an automatic car wash, relocate an existing trash enclosure, and relocate a previously approved Healy Tank at an existing ARCO gas service station and 'convenience store in the Community Commensal (CC) District, Tema Vista Planned Community (TVPC), located at 11768- Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0227 151-41:-Related file: Conditional Use Permit CUP96-14. Design Parameters: The subject property. is._.a...-.parcel.. located at the..northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Masi Drive with an area of about 49,110 square feet (1.13 acre). The overall dimensions of the site are about 200 feet (east to west) by about 217 feet(north.to south). The site is fully developed with a gas station/convenience store operated by ARCO. An overhead fueling canopy, landscaping, and parking areas are present. To the west of the site,is.a Carl's Jr.fast food restaurant; to the east are two (2) retail buildings; to the south is the 26-acre Masi commercial center, and to the north is vacant land. The zoning of the property and the surrounding properties to the west, north, and east is Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista Planned Community (TVPC). The zoning of the properties to the south is Industrial Park (IP) District(Subarea 7). A shared drive aisle along the north side of the property provides.access to the site. The applicant proposes to construct a freestanding, automated self-service carwash building of about 1,000 square feet. The carwash will be generally located at the northeast comer of the site along the east property line. The primary axis of the carwash will be north to south, with the entrance and exit on the south and north sides, respectively. To ensure safe exiting from the carwash, a space of about 18 feet deep has been provided between the carwash and the drive aisle to the north that will allow a vehicle to pause before proceeding into the drive aisle. Included in the proposal is the construction of a drive aisle directing vehicles to the carwash, demolition of the existing.trash enclosure, construction of a new trash enclosure, and relocation of the exterior Healy EVR system to the interior of the carwash building. For screening purposes, a new 6-foot high by 32-foot long block wall will be constructed along the east property line. The existing parking stalls will be relocated; parking stalls are.not required for the carwash building. The architecture of the carwash building will match the design and general appearance of the existing gas station/convenience store and include matching finish, colors, trim, and materials (see the attached Building Elevation Exhibits F1, F2, and F3 from Staff Report dated August 14, 1996). No revisions to the existing building are proposed. The project will require the removal of approximately four trees; as a -- condition of approval, the applicant will be required to replant trees at a ratio of 1:1.. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project 1. None. EX"IT"i- Item B-25 DRC ACTION AGENDA • DR2009-00308— INO CRUZ January 5, 2010 Page 2 Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall. 2. The new block wall along the east property line shall be constructed of decorative concrete masonry units (slumpstone, spilt-face, etc.) or have a decorative fmish on both sides. 3. The new trash enclosure shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosure shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the existing gas station/convenience store building. 4. The speed bumps in the drive aisle shall be subject to review and approval by the Fire Construction Services Department. 5. The windows on the west elevation of the carwash shall be one-way glass. 6. No business identification; advertisements, or product/service-related signs shall be placed on the carwash building. • Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Desion Review Committee Action: The Committee recommends approval'to the Planning Commission. The Committee reviewed the application and concurred with most of staffs design recommendations, including the use of one-way glass on the west elevation and the prohibition of signs on the carwash. The exception was the speed bumps in the drive aisle; after discussion, it was concluded that they are unnecessary. The Committee requested that the applicant use PVC instead of wood for the-overhead trellis at the entrance and exit of the carwash. They also requested that the applicant construct a 3-foot high planter wall and landscaping to screen the carwash from Foothill Boulevard. The wall would only be necessary along the south side of the drive aisle leading to the carwash entrance. The applicant agreed with these revisions and will incorporate them into the plans for final review and action by the.Planning Commission. Members Present: Munoz, Wmberly, Granger, Nicholson Staff Planner. Mike Smith Item B-26 WD IF R rz ? , ♦ i ♦ � ��* �j 4 EXTERIOR ELEVATION•aiAarFAcwT6wNwarm rmmgvmeu Nhm Elevation Key Plan #p � �Jlp w..i•t":�9�' 09 ..mnwl� lQJ �' ul . Ill ® m' • � .....,,,,,1 a EXTERIOri ELEVATION IsourHFActxiwon,llan. u' a d .....,.•.... mom: ...m TOWER ELEVATION IFAcf7o M96C�IION1 � .. •r/. w.yC rf..•n 9./.'.a..•.P.f NVY vV•. vw TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION TRASH ENCLOSURE REM ELEVATION TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION UP-5 oil IF ' 0� �9 FROMT'EXTERIOR ELEVATION IFAcm teaA ver^vraLetAce cErfmn) Ir u a CID n cu 1 _J . A d 00 u� til IC aea �-" Cf.tRd7 -o, EXTERIOR ELEVATION trh su ------ ------- I �l EXTERK)R ELEVA710N eam+FAcna TsaAns�Arr�arB�Aoecg+reu Elevation Ker Plan Materials Schedule 7 Ob CL % J m .� —` CUA 60 yr. __ _ ^•'^••vD tTs. a ps -NN.WW �:1 FRONT ELEYATION d ROOF PLAN +nu.ff_t•_. ¢ d rn � - 3 tMR N WP a fns '� q.f .n �uw..•WI MAs•o �C Q7 � t p to s . � 4 eg6# rT m�_g O� `IV�ipl � r''—k`•"v^I V... � lel f t t , / a b wr........� o-K•ww•s'C.ww n.� cJIDE ELEyATiCN� ` �� r ARCO WVPM WA-0 ET I'M Canopy Floor Pian 0.000 9F ••�•n• •• •.• "• i nV- VDKI tIP-8 SO COAST SERVICE STATION, LP - RANCHO 224 S. Joy Street • Corona, CA 92879 Phone 951-280-3833 Fax 951-280-3832 December 8, 2009 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga DEC 0 8 2009 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RECEIVED-PUMM . To whom it may concern., The existing operations of the Arco service station located at 11768 Foothill Blvd., Rancho Cucamonga, CA consist of a 24 hour/7 day a week convenience store and auto fueling station with 3 employee shifts 2 employees per shift. The proposed addition of a new self serve automated carwash will maintain the same hours of operations.of 24 hour/7 day a week convenience store and auto fueling station with 3 employee,shifts 2 employees per shift. Sincerely, �. z Hago Kofdarali oe P-Operation-Letter.doc EXHIBIT K Item B-30 r LEWIS OPERATING CORP. 1156 North Mountain Avenue/Upland,California 91786 P.0. Box 670/Upland,Callfomia 91785-0670 (909)985-0971 Fax:(909)949-6700 Date: October 12, 2009 ,ffy OF pAN(No CUUMONGA To: So. Cal Service Station, LP - Masi OCT 11768 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 From: John Dvorak Lewis Group of Companies Subject: Grant Permission for Construction and Maintenance Access Dear Mr. Ino Cruz, We as owners of parcel #0227-151-40 located at 11778 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, we grant access to our property during construction and the access for maintenance purposes after completion of construction. Sincerely, Lewis-fit 'I to C J Dv Regional Director-Retail EXHIBIT Item B-31 • RESOLUTION NO. 10-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2009-00308 - INO CRUZ (FOR ARCO), A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT AN AUTOMATIC CAR WASH, RELOCATE AN EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE, AND RELOCATE A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED HEALY TANK AT AN EXISTING ARCO GAS SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT,TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY(NPC), LOCATED AT 11768 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0227-151-41. RELATED FILE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-14. A. Recitals. 1. Ino Cruz, on behalf of Atlantic Richfield Corporation(ARCO),filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2009-00308, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of February 2010, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded • said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 10, 2010, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a developed parcel of land located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Masi Drive—APN: 0227-151-41. The parcel has an overall area of approximately 49,110 square feet(1.13 acre); and b. The street frontage (east-to-west) of the parcel along Foothill Boulevard is approximately 200 feet and the depth (north-to-south)of the parcel is approximately 217 feet; and C. To the west of the site is a fast food restaurant and to the east are two (2) retail • buildings. To the south is the 26-acre Masi commercial center. To the north it is vacant; and d. The applicant proposes to construct an automated car wash with a floor area of approximately 1,000 square feet at the northeast comer of the project site; and EXHIBIT C .. Item B-32 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-03 DRC2009-00308— INO CRUZ(for ARCO) February 10, 2.010 Page 2 e. The construction of the new car wash will require the relocation of the trash enclosure elsewhere on the site and the relocation of the outdoor Healy Tank Enhanced Vapor Recovery(EVR)system to the interior of the new building; and f. The proposed car wash will be an added service to an existing service station that is operated by ARCO and was previously reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on August 14, 1996, (Related File: Conditional Use Permit 96-14).. Per the Terra Vista Community Plan, Page V-21, car washes are permitted in the Community Commercial District within the Terra Vista Plan; and g. - The hours of operations for this carwash will be the same as the gas station/convenience store which operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; and h. The car wash will not require any new employees as the facility is fully automated; and i. The applicant is required to provide thirteen (13) parking stalls for the gas station/convenience store. There are currently fourteen (14) on the site. The new carwash will require the removal of five(5)parking stalls. The applicant will construct four(4)new parking stalls elsewhere on the site resulting in a net loss of one (1) parking stall. Additional parking is not required for the new car wash. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed car wash is in accord.with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code,Terra Vista Community Plan,and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed project is to construct an automated car wash and is consistent with development in the vicinity. b. The proposed car wash,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The surrounding properties are zoned commercial and the surrounding uses are commercial-oriented. c. _ --The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed car wash meets all standards outlined in the Development Code,Terra Vista Community Plan, and the design and development standards and policies.of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303-New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures-as the proposed structure is less than 2,500 square feet in floor area. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. Item B-33 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-03 DRC2009-00308— INO CRUZ (for ARCO) February 10, 2010 • Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby-approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction of an automatic car wash with a floor area of 1,000 square feet at an existing ARCO gas station/convenience store in the Community Commercial(CC)District,Terra Vista Planned Community (TVPC) located at 11768 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0227-151-41. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) The car wash shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code, including, but not limited to, noise levels. If operation of the car wash causes adverse effects upon the gas station/convenience store, and/or adjacent businesses or operations, then the Conditional Use Permit shall be • brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 4) Any modification or intensification of the existing uses; any improvements including new building. construction; and/or other mod ifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director or Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy,construction,commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. 5) Outdoor storage of sales products,supplies,materials,and equipment is prohibited. 6) The windows on the west elevation of the car wash building shall be one-way vision glass that restricts visibility of the interior of the car wash from the outside. 7) The overhead trellis at the south and north sides of the building shall be constructed of polyvinyl chloride (PVC). .8) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 9) Signs identifying products, advertising services, or identifying the car wash building as "car wash" are not permitted. Signs required by. Federal, State, or local agencies are exempt. Item B-34 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-03 DRC2009-00308— INO CRUZ(for ARCO) February 10, 2010 Page 4 10) All walls, including retaining walls, exposed to public view shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slump-stone or stack-stone, or have a decorative finish such as stucco. 11) A 3-foot high planter wall shall be constructed and landscaping installed along the south side of the drive aisle that leads to. the entrance of the car wash. The walls of the planter shall be constructed of decorative block or finished to match the existing building. 12) Landscaping shall be installed prior to release for occupancy. Building and Safety 1) The installation of the EVR and the foundation surcharge design of the carwash building must be approved by the county of San Bernardino Fire Department before obtaining Building & Safety plan check approval. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2010. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: - Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman ATTEST: Jam R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R.T er,AICP,Secretary of the Planning Commission of the_City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing-Resolution.was-duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of February.2010, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Item B-35 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS . PROJECT#: DRC2009-00308 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: INO CRUZ (FOR ARCO) LOCATION: 11768 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD —APN: 0227-151-41 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,officers,or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 10-03, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s)are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X SC-12-08 1 I:IPLANNINGIFINALIPLNGC0MM12010 Res &Stf Rpt1DRC2009-00308 StdCond 2-10.doc Item B-36 Project No.DRC2009-00308 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department,the conditions contained herein,Development Code regulations, and the Terra Vista Community Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and I I_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers,AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming,and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments,transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. D. Shopping Centers 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 3. Signs shall.be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking"and for"employee parking only." I_I_ 4. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m.and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.rn 2 1:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res &Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00308 StdCond 2-10.doc Item B-37 Project No.DRC2009-00308 Completion Date b. Loading and Unloading-No person shall cause the loading,unloading,opening,closing,or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other ® similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m.and 7 a.m.unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by,the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. , 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. ——— F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall • contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall(including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles,entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. G. Landscaping 1. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; • 3 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res &Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00308 StdCond 2-10.doc Item B-38 Project No.DRC200940308 Completion Date e. Electrical Plans(2 sets,detached)including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans,including isometrics,underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC2009-00308) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and"wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to / the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Department. I. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number(i.e.,DRC2009-00308). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tractiparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Constriuct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter). J. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas. /—/- 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. 4 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res &Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00308 StdCond 2-10.doc Item B-39 Project No.DRC2009-00308 Completion Date K. Grading ® 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. —— 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared,stamped, and signed bya California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. ® 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings,with direct lighting to.be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. M. Building Numbering. 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 5 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00308 StdCond 2A0.doc Item B-40 a � Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS October 15, 2009 Arco New Car Wash Building 11768 Foothill Blvd. DRC2009-00308 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The installation of the EVR and the foundation surcharge design of the carwash building must be approved by the county of San Bernardino Fire Department before obtaining RCFPD plan check approval. The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamon-ga.ca.us/fire/index.htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the ® corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply is existing 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300- feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. _ 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. • FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. Item B-41 I. Location of Access: All portions of the structures I" story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside tum radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable,must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 6. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. - Multiple-access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be . _. required for any activity or operation not specifically.described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. Item 8-42 • Compressed Gases • Repair Garages Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures FSC-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2007 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD46and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the$92 review fee. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14'6" above the finished surface of the road. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION—Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet-or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. I Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded ® and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. Item !0-43 4. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 5. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 6. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 7. Mapping Site Plan: Prior.to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 ''/i" x 11" or 11 x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. Item EI-44 RESOLUTION NO. 15-01 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2014-01076, A REQUEST TO EXTEND THE EXPIRATION DATE OF AN APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (DRC2009-00308) FOR TWO YEARS FROM FEBRUARY 10, 2015,TO FEBRUARY 10,2017, FOR THE DESIGN,LAYOUT AND OPERATION OF A PROPOSED AUTOMATIC CAR WASH AT AN EXISTING SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED IN THE COMMUNITY - COMMERCIAL (CC) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AT 11768 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1090-121-16. A. Recitals. 1. Jaswinders and Lakhbir Kaur Sondh filed application DRC2014-01076 for a two(2)year time extension of Conditional Use Permit DRC2014-00308 as described in the title of this Resolution.The time extension is being requested in orderto complete construction drawings for the project and to submit them to the Building Department. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject time extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 10, 2010, the Planning Commission of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 10-03, approving CUP DRC2009-00308 subject to the expiration date of February 10, 2015. • 3. On January 28, 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial- evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 28, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. Conditional Use Permit DRC2009-00308 was approved on February 10,2010 with a five(5)year approval period which terminates on February 10, 2015. The applicant is requesting to extend the expiration date by two(2)year in order to complete construction drawings and submit the project to the City. The new expiration date will be February 10, 2017; and b. The applicant does not propose any changes to the original project in conjunction with this time extension request; and C. The previously approved Conditional Use Permit (DRC2009-00308) is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and Item B-45 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-01 DRC2014-01076—JASWINDERS AND LAKHBIR KAUR SONDH JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 2 d. The time extension of the previously approved Conditional Use Permit will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, or policies as the scope of the originally approved project has not changed; and e. The time extension of the previously approved Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as the originally approved project is completely on private property and will not negatively impact the adjacent public right-of-way or the neighboring properties; and f. The extension is within the time limits established by 17.14.090 (C), of the. Development Code. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission determined that the original project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (c) (New Construction) in connection with the City's original approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2009-00308 on February 10,2010. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No changes are proposed to the project; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; and no new important information shows that the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered. There are no changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated when concluding the project was categorically exempt. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not analyzed in the previous environmental review,and will not have more severe effects than previously analyzed. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration.of Time Extension DRC2014-01076. b. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Time Extension DRC2014-01076 for Conditional Use Permit DRC2009-00308. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above,this Commission hereby extends the expiration date of Conditional Use Permit DRC2009-00308 for an additional two(2)years by modifying Standard Condition 131 (which set forth the original five(5)year approval period) contained in Resolution No.10-03 for DRC2009-00308 to read as follows: "This time extension extends the original expiration date for DRC2009-00308 for two (2) years from February 10, 2015 to February 10, 2017," subject to the following conditions: Item B-46 PLANNING COMMISSION.RESOLUTION NO. 15-01 DRC2014-01076—JASWINDERS AND LAKHBIR KAUR SONDH JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 3 Planning Department 1) Any requests for future time extensions shall be subject to the procedures, conditions, and findings as set forth in Section 17.14.090 of the Development Code. 2) All other conditions of approval, including all of the Standard/Special Conditions of approval from other City departments for Conditional Use Permit DRC2009-00308 within Resolution10-03, shall remain in effect. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ® ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: .ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:. ..._ ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • Item B-47 Conditions of Approval O GAMONGh Community P P Development Department Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE -020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. En-gineering Services Department 1. Madrone Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local Street" standards as required and including: a. Provide curb, property line sidewalk and street trees, as required. b. Provide commercial driveway approaches for both drive aisles. North drive approach shall align with existing private street on opposite side of Madrone Avenue. c. Provide two (2) 5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlights, as required. d. Provide traffic signing and striping, as required. •e. The necessary right-of-way for Madrone Avenue is 30 feet, measured from the street.centerline. 2. Pavement reconstruction and overlays up to the centerline of Madrone Avenue will be determined during plan check. 3. Transitions to offsite existing conditions to the north and to the south from project boundaries shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical except for 66 kv) on the project side of Madrone Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite the northerly property boundary to the first pole offsite the southerly property boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 5. Parcel Map 16141 has installed the storm drain and related improvements along 9th Street from Lanyard Court to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The developer of Parcel Map 16141 is eligible for reimbursement to recover the proportionate cost of the storm drain installation. The fair share amount has been determined per approved Reimbursement Agreement dated August 27, 2007, City File DRA-37, which shall be paid prior to final map approval or building permit issuance, whichever comes first. The approved amount last August 2007 for this development is $ 65,732.13 which shall be increased at a rate of 10% per year. • Printed:12/22/2014 www.cityofRC.us Item B-48 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineerina Services Department 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 7. A non-refundable- deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated' operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months. of .operation_, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 8. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and. related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction.and/or demolition project. 9. The City is willing to consider installation of a private storm drain lateral across adjacent property to the south, which is owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for public park purposes. Such a facility would need to be designed to accommodate all private flows south of Arrow Route and be located along the north and east edges of the future park site in a private drainage easement. Development would pay all costs for installing the private storm drain from the existing pubic storm drain at the southeast corner of the park site to the north. project boundary. A developer-to-developer reimbursement agreement would allow sharing of the costs among benefiting. properties. Developer shall also provide a legal description for the offsite drainage easement and provide a private drainage easement in favor of properties to the north on the final tract map. 10. Amount of parking spaces shall be in accordance with Development Code Section 17.64. 11. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 30 total feet on Madrone Avenue 12. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 13. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 14. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. www.CityofRC.us Printed:12/22/2014 Page 2 of 8 Item B-49 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE -020726201-0000 Wroject Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 15. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no .person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 16. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Madrone Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk ®Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Curbside Drain Outlet Printed:12/22/2014 v4ww.cityofRc.us Page 3 of 8 . - Item B-50 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 17. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City. Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,--whichever occurs first. b, Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department' in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for. future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City -roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 18. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards__.in accordance with the City's street tree program. www.QtyofRC.us Page 4 of 8 Printed:12/22/2014 - Item B-51 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 19. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Madrone Avenue Botanical Name- Pinus canariensis Common Name-Canary Island Pine Min. Grow Space- 7' Spacing -35' O.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. •2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 20. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 21. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 22. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 23. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 24. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. C. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit 1. See SUBTT case for B&S and FCS conditions Printed:12122/2014 www.QtyofRC.us Page 5 of 8 Item B-52 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design.recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety, Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building-and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing . a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to- obtain written - permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on -property line or ,provide a details) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 13. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 8 Printed:12/22/2014 Item B-53 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities ,location: 8583 ARROW RTE -020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA.Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 14. Private streets for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 15. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 16. Roof storm water is not permitted- to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 17. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 18. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 19. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 20. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit -may be -subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. - 21. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 22. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. Printed:12/22J2014 www.CityafRC.us Page 7 of 8 Item B-54 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE -020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Gradina Section 23. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water *quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. -- - -- - 24. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official.and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 25. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 26. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 27. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations .for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 28. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 29. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. www.CityofRC.us Page S of S Printed:12/22/2014 Item B-55 STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: January 28, 2015 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C;UCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00620 — BENCHMARK COMMUNITIES -A request for the architectural and site plan review for the construction of 95 single-family homes located within the Low-Residential (L) District of the Etiwanda North Specific-Plan adjacent to Indian Wells Place approximately 1,800 feet north of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1087-071-15. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226-2. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #88082915 and #98121091 certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001), and there are no new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Design Review DRC2014-00620 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: • A. Project Density: 2.59 dwelling units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant Land - North Etiwanda Preserve - Etiwanda North Specific Plan South - Single-Family Residential - Etiwanda North Specific Plan East - Southern California Edison Corridor- Etiwanda North Specific Plan West - Southern California Edison Corridor- Etiwanda North Specific Plan C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - North Etiwanda Preserve South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Utility Corridor West - Utility Corridor\Flood Control D. Site Characteristics and Background: The project is situated at the base of the alluvial fan, which is located at the base of the Eastern San Gabriel Mountain foothills. The site is bordered by vacant land to the north and west and by single-family homes to the south and east. On July 24, 2002, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226, which permitted the subdivision of 265 residential lots on 92.78 acres of land located north of the intersection of Day Creek Boulevard and Indian Wells Place. The project is part of a 632-unit Master Planned Community known as Rancho Etiwanda Estates. The site has since been divided into multiple phases, all of which have been approved for development except for the subject 95 lots that are located within the remaining 37.43 acres at the northwest corner of • Rancho Etiwanda Estates. The project site was previously rough-graded, and perimeter block Item C-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00620— BENCHMARK COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 2 walls as well as homeowner association maintained walls, fences, and landscaping have been installed along Indian Wells Place. ANALYSIS: A. General: The subject property is located within the „Upper Etiwandan neighborhood of the Etiwanda North.Specific Plan (ENSP), which requires development to comply with specific site and architectural design guidelines. Particular"primary” architectural styles, such as Bungalow, Ranch, Monterey, and San Juan are required to be used on at least two-thirds of the proposed units. The applicant has chosen to use only primary architectural styles and will, therefore, be in compliance with this requirement. The San Juan elevation incorporates wrought iron details, shed roof awning with decorative wood braces and exposed rafter tales. The Country style incorporates decorative gables, louvered shutters, and stucco window trim.The Bungalow style incorporates stone wainscot and porch column bases with dual post columns, decorative beams and brackets at gables and wood shingle siding. The. Monterey style incorporates decorative shutters, wood balcony, beams, and railing as well as exposed rafter tails. All homes will also incorporate decorative garage doors. The ENSP also requires residential projects of this size to incorporate a minimum of eight (8) housing footprints with a minimum of four (4) elevations per footprint. The ENSP allows for reverse footprints to count as an additional footprint. The ENSP also allows for plans with courtyard walls and patios along the front elevation to count as an additional elevation. As seen in the chart below, the proposed development will be in compliance with these minimum requirements. Floor Plan/Elevation Confi uration ,.�.:: - w,b,.�"1- w�Iu�.. � Y y 1 ritere;". Court:a'%dti =MPorclrg,- ,n:*:Woga_ =San� `�;Rai�:ch�:�Bun'•aCaw =:Mo - ,y�..=��..:x_.:Y. -��._- , ./._ _ ...]..,; F.�7F ' .!_y,�. ':3::t}s" •S_�.�^�.,• un. uan - -- er•.na�ea .e;.... ... fi".. x t .'.Pfat2*d x x x 4 x _Pli 3*"` x x x x 4 Plan~ *° x x x x 4 * Reverse footprint will also be provided. The floor plans range in size from a 2,689 square foot plan to a 4,055 square foot plan. One (1) of the four (4) floor plans will be single-story, while the other three (3) are two-story. The plans submitted indicate that twenty-five (25) percent of the lots will-contain-single=story homes-, which is a requirement,specified in the ENSP. Additionally, a Development Agreement was approved in 2001 that requires compliance with the Low Residential District standards for all lots within this tract (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226). Development standards for the Low Residential District include, but are not limited to, maximum lot coverage of forty (40) percent, maximum height of thirty-five (35) feet, minimum front yard setback of eighteen (18) feet with an average front yard setback of twenty (20) feet (measured from the.right-of-way), a fifteen (15-) foot minimum building separation on side yards with a five(5-) and ten (10-)foot side yard setback measured from the property lines. In reviewing the site plan, staff found that the project meets all of these standards. Item C-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00620— BENCHMARK COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 • Page 3 B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger) reviewed the elevations on December 16, 2014. Site design and architecture were discussed. No issues or concerns were raised. The Committee recommended approval to the Planning Commission. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on December 16, 2014. No issues or concerns were raised. The Committee recommended approval to the Planning Commission. D. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting for Design Review DRC2014-00620 was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the site. The meeting was held in the Creative Corner room at Central Park, located at 11200 Base Line Road on Monday, December 1, 2014. There were a total of seven people in attendance. No major issues or concerns were raised, and some of the attendees asked questions regarding the design and expected cost of the homes. E. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified an Environmental Impact Report in June 1991 for the University/Crest Planned Development, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors .in October 1999 which approved the creation of two stand-alone developments, and an Initial Study Addendum was certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga • in connection with the approval of Tentative Tract Map 16226. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or(iv)additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated the design review and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previously certified EIR. The proposed development does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report for the tract map. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. The project was developed with a Development Agreement for the 632-lot subdivision. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of the design review application. • Item C-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00620—BENCHMARK COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page.4 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully ubmitted, Candyce B ett Planning Director CB: DP/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Aerial Map Exhibit B - Site Utilization Map Exhibit C - Phasing Plan Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit F - Architectural Plans Exhibit G - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit H - Wall and Fence Plan Exhibit I - Design Review Committee Action Agenda Exhibit J Neighborhood Meeting Summary Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2014-00620 with Conditions of Approval Item C-4 _x - Y r p' 1-7 NP ILL 21 f t ! 1 :2 f _ W-51 f t , F x, t 4e .D 1 a� �.�. } t .. ^'3� � � -i.: d ri ,-w• ..m,�pcpp""�IR.me".'�`m' r'.: 8 ,. tIS rt.�77k.Tbkl. e � ,. c !• A •. `:.'1 !^6 t'L'CvtP°�S ��:: 3..'�. t r �` �, i :.� �x\c,�.+h��.?�a7 i �E, t'ic. r�.n C.r'� l 1 <Z.. � A.ct � '' 1 t y. a '� a, �e P••..i. - t :.1 C��ir«. ����,'��l/J , -e r � ♦ 'e /h Rk '< �� - } t r +. .,Ti ' e iib �. { .w. 1"3 1 y ti�_ 1 / ' • - s &7YL ia x:•. 1 1 1 aq x r.. s 1554 .Te } ki v ` 3 �� �� � 7 II � a..M1d♦y ( %'`D1+ � t a ; `"-,� + 5a ti ;S e � �,�.rt�, ,'�i 410 �'� f ��"irgy'*l,«�, q .i r&�Ca A �+ 1 +. r.Z +. �t r. x y' - is, ` I • t 8 y . { �. I a$ to Pr. - ,k. � �� � � k���+�sr ] � `a.+• c .� ,, MDS ®® �� �a'� �; ,4. / a p •.>t a .'1 i. ^' �' • •• . • V101 .I `YI/\ � lAO.WP. PZOP&ZTY / VACANf 03 AWL a_ 50 75 48 49 1 56 58 11 1 RRA 51B PHA 20 21 9E 59 60 61 62 63 64 1165 166 167 68 69 7071 72 ^ 29 17 PHA ffi RU 16 M p 73 PHASE tl ` , T ' ' "`y"""""s-"_ ' 0 47 o PHA 18 - 4844 43 42 41 40 39 38 g7 6E 1 92 91 90 g9 88 87 86 85 B4 76 77 u 45 95 94 83 g2 PFRA9E /,pQ. 28 32 33 34 35 PHA 8 29 30 31 36 9 10 0 PHA 7 PFIN 8 7 7 228 80 26 20 5 18 0 ® / 1p 33 24 23 22 21 � u � C7 u 18 p �" 7R4C7 M.18227-2 Wy 10 11 72 13 M 2 9 4 5 6 - 4 3 ' 2 1 g 7 6 5 Y Y i6 -1 ` PREPARED FOR BENCHMARK(XMBYflMffIE6 PREPARED BYE REVISED:NOVEMBER 24, 2014 DRC 2014-00620 TRACT No. 16226-2, LOTS 1-95 RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES PHASING PLAW CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sheet 2 of 23 . mo _Vi, SHEET No,5 (_AD.Wp. PROPERTY /VACANY SEE SHEET No.6 ,,,,,,,,, ..................,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, „ .............,,,....,.,,,...... ,,,,.,Y ...... .........,.,........,.......... J em mi v 46 75 0 49 W 51 52 537`07`1 557 60 61 62 63 64 65 6 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 76 47 77 46 q6 44 43 42 41 40 39 36 37 93 92 81 90 89 87 86 85 84 83 a"'^°— 78 } c.;,w : do 95 94 a ,� „ / `P 0 27 28 29 30 3133734 35M)" 36 U 2 6O / 7 T 226 3R 3 /` 0` 19 _G011RT�-O 26 24 23 22 21 19 \ ? / u TRALT No.'N227-2 g 15 16 � 10 n 1z 13 n a \ '` . a PLAN TYPErABLB 3 2 1 7 6 5 4 0 i 1 p�p 40 PREPARED FOR 7RA T N .-Be 6P/ II t�� w \� BBmJC'FAI�AR COI.IAnlIRIEB -1 F PREPARED BY. RlN1 . PLAN 2 PIAN 3 PLAN 4 PLAN 40 REVISED NOVEMBER 24,204 DRC 2014-00620 TRACT No. 16226-2, LOTS 1-95 FLAN TPE FUDTPRNIS - RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES DETAIL SITE PLAN SHEET INDEX I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORN A a Sheet 3 of 23 N � q 1 \_-►mil �� ���-�,� �t�\� � � � , �� M D S ----- ---------------------- T t j V SEE SHEEr 4 LEGEND wr BACKS LEGO PREPARED rO BENCHMARK commuwrEs PREPARED REPAREQ WOTMU lmw- mm"m NOTES, REVISED:NOVEMBER 24,2014 DRC 2014-00620 oPnoNuoPnoNs TRACT No. 16226-2, LOTS 1-95 RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES DETAIL SITE PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA a Sheet 5 of 23 LAD WP.PROPERTY/VACANT U77 " rq e _ �_._. f7 ...,....�., r i a , z TRACT NO.16226 NOTA PARI . 0 LEGEND: SETBACKSQ n 4 r PREPARED FOR ... ow.. � BENCHM APoC COMMUNRIES RIOVDED OPTIONS PREPARBO u. PREPARED BYE 'Arn.� REVISED:NOVEMBER 24,2014 • p `�'° ::I ((( DRC 2014-00620 d • ° ^° • p oPraNAL oPTIONe TRACT No. 16226-2, LOTS 1-95 RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES rt DETAIL SITE PLAN I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA d Sheet 6 of 23 N a®a�mm®��� ami®m®a aaamao momm om,o �®®®��� mmm•a oaoaoa Wim® a®CaCC®mC�a©mm®a ammmao Das am�isom®®m���©mm®a a�aoaaoa ®�svQi m®Cam®�im���o® m•m m m®aom�®m���mmmm® 0mmmao ��mm m®C0�®O�CCCO®_�_�_®_ OCCCCO �OSC m�C®Cm®mC ' mom®®m mamaCaa ®�� m®acv®m®am�mo�m®m maaaaa m�sm m�CaC®®�C�Co®®mm maaaao ��sC m®som®®m�omam�m�m moaoaa mss© m®oao®om����m®mm maaaaa �0m m®COC®®mC��mO�®m mmm®mm SCC ®®oamm•�am�mamm®®m m©�—�� m�sm�®�i®mCCC ®mm.m _ �mmm•m ®C�mm®mCC�m��aa�mm o®aom®®m©��mm®mm m amm®mm�m�mm®m m®o0m®m.m�m��mm®� m®oom®®mm©m m®aam®�amm©mm�m®m m®som m®som�m•m`m��om��o m®iTiaC®�mCCCmm��� m aso®®m�m•�mmmm•� m�amm®®m�sm■mmmm•m m®ao��®�mCmCmm®®� m®ss m®aom®m.a�m�m®m®m m��Cm®�aCCCm�m�m e amm•®m�a�mmm m ®sa��®�CCCm�m®m m®Cam®® CCC©�m�m v am®m•m m o��®®®®� mm�m•m m®s ��mmm®m m®CCm®®mC�amm®m•m M D 5 m■�iCoC®m�CmCm ®gym „ ,� oil omtoom®m����ommm•o e®a0m®®m■�©gym®m®o _ m®som®®m���m ®®m . • � , m®CaC®®m�mmmm®®m �- • � ••. • OAC©C�®mCmm�m�®d A DA A m®a�om®®m��mmmm®m m®CCo®���a'C�_jaomm®� deli i i III x- vaHrr sur SHEET No.10 L.AD.W P. PROPERTY /VACANT SEE SHEET No.11 3u�nn�umnm�mum�uuumuu�uuuunmuiuuimiu�mumuu�uunmmum�mu unuauuuunuu...................mu�un uunanuuu�uunumunm�unm�u�u�miumu�mummu�u�uuuu�nuannuuununuuuuuunuuunnuuununuumuuum ,r 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 75 59 60 72 73 74 K 1—LC C1--F1lAM6 —BRINE 76 ALA 0 FVC tATG / 9. 47 46 45 44 ]4342 41 40 39 38 37 93 92 91 90 89 87 86 85 84 78 77 `� 82 / P� 79 i VO r27 .28 sf 0 29 33 34 30 31 32 38 f /� � 60 T r 228 `.9 _ �BASPEi�f X A \ /� O � c) = 28 25 24 23 22 2120 � 18! / J� CA) u i 910 11 12 13 14 15 18 t7 // TRACT No.-16227-2 691 .f 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 000 D PREPARED FOR TRA T la -1 BENCHMARKCOMMUNRIE3 PREPARED BY 8 REVISED:NOVEMBER 24,2014 DRC 2014-00620 TRACT No. 16226-2, LOTS 1-95 RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN SHEET INDEX CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sheet 8 o123 M�ypY,y,9laM,iW/I OWN p, IN RD now Voc maim lr.!Fw� will KIM -W-1. ir,"DI PO ON F49 vi DDE E®W ----------- �.a . ..../..... ............. . ........ .... ... 1�r••m—,_ua— . .... . ........ ................ 10 - - 4-14i, - p . '• a _ , .�,•, '' ' ..r•� — - - J•'m ..,�. � Ra ,ems,n. � .....- � - .. :� it---Y.. y.r �r.' ••.• �.�L ... .-`.'c '°�:,�.JiFi,'• _ '1'�'' f'.��'T - _ __ _X1 _ � ~•�.f,Pa.. {{+ �"4 1—=i k _ _ _ - so s" ss _ ----.:3. t y%`a� �'W 7�� •M1. �'-� � �.t r� a4•- - ^�� �Y-- , / ...._. n no � r � � R G __ �..,_ ..�--- ss�,��_ �'x �_ 5'st3" 1.�.,;. � ..I� ' e. sa'. � �.� �1�•. .•�_f��R�Rrr'� 2_ ��y ,' ��» I As✓ eB _ q m , _ r. a' umtj a� .-.,.. '.� p .,_ �r.... I�.J=�•-� �/'�' 'T!— �' X19 _ 77 , 46 49 v :f''• ':#'l_n.i�.r...=.3.;,at� i:;�r.. ,:'hl - *.�'w.::.'� '=d{, a I � •:y..:, -�-. . ...�,..,, � 13 42. 93 i. flJ �'�'.�-' .I za, tiF% vJ�'1 I 1.7BfHJ' '�f_r L 3N(N)L;�, - ;�; f� S�. ! �S✓`. "1"'•1' ,:- , ,`� 4�. �, 1a T h-6-� SEE SHEEP 9 C �"P_ KIDfr EF:Y.Y,W I°,cY,•-1. ,R I✓wDl •Y �i_�n FTD1R7l,GDR �' ER:R'D,oaER,Dr � a .. QDTpD Eac - Emraa,vxmwrt :a, F rmo,w.nY EaD%-rt•,D EIII,.q,YrAX-arDaE o �•:;aJ:dl:mozi :..._�':-: EIOIDCJEA4EIDM(,Nt,NTFD OMrEu9 2] x.V1D Z pp��p�r�pV EG,TDO EGiE19JR Itt91 G'.l1 1 r>La ARW B z9 9 P�:xrarxma.EDGrtx.7or•:u .____._. r,rcREaaEDParlaEwAu rnEaspnnxR a Eazuon o ae a o rra . ..... �o ENR rAKF1T&I,Af EfREET _ -�� Ilf_UM EIFEI FE tE ,�9 e ' .•...E•R E.era.••• .e.T•Tarr �.—.� rd,D91PEGYE,ERCIDOI HALE •l•D • rR0PO Pd Y/.DE EIDE YARD DATE 0 aJd YiDE M1lM OrEEI DATE REVISED=NOVEMBER 24,2014 Cl P,UEXTER DRC 2014-00620 r,16G9DC4^Jp[rCFaLEa TRACT No. 16226-2, LOTS 1-95 ' ® RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINQ STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sheet 10 of 23 m WEI :LQ "law gl; Im, SiR -ITr 'MIT wo --ml- M AIR, , may Lip KENN ace sr.,n,pits earn:w ,sorts am frlE m xMrN msorspsrr,rz: �° . q x ranm.o >m q.oa ,m ca.en v moe ae w a,.w nsm, u srio..w rw m. W WYC tWf K 1WM [mv n wxo aam n samn,a.m m a,aa m�,m. �. ...o..aawaov w.wc m•cc,v m.werw.w,m _--- __ _ ____________ _ . .,,.....rz owum,awm�s a,xaw n,.s r+. .v,'w"'a,s'�`'n.anvsv.+marr�.+o•uxo..w,w'•`Ow.an u�,. —tea +t vnv�r�._x,�J___ _=��n� --v I■ -- saaoma a oneww rw r ,m minis i mEF1 I �aiv R n s m arum _ mawwart rex as rtww[mns a rn ro�awm naw w,a rx m ,m mnwr. i•mm,oviio°.w°�,i:•n.r•0S",s,wv+K saa+n�ec o a�''• a,•�n'�.:,.�e„�.a:,;,,'�:�m�, aw,aw w,wawaa,.a..wm m...,,,m. m ww,wwa,,. ,maan�.ijwa; a.anc s..r n• ,.a �,a ,�_�aa / / m„er so.rma 1y, sin amnarx eperaVo 17mer m EQ! / I / °`iU1°0' // � 8 rnucri.amaa.�i[ I� Smarr aaanmmmnr. rww..s b�"'•w x' A'w ir.myn._ waaq ru[aawu aro .oa a ,a� / oB.o v,s4•�':ga�i-��_T:nr.—fa,r��, roa•ea. ""_"sriyP`vaw[�aano rax..,naa.:w^m oarw.e.>�.av �mr'Gaa'v°°rw ac°waia m'ea"Ynnna•,n w.'w�`"m' rm...u.m.o c-b mu � :; .viica' � n"`i�n_vry-fa�, rwno �� • – C .t Y �d s'� 1[►�I K tl q-0r,K,0aq. � ,a.aa v was,oa mm.v m rwwwwa am a uwr.m w m,.w m � 9 '�`_ /sdr°1°6,• ���'BOUNDARY SURVEY ®�,Rnuwaw m a mares_nuaa suwm a _ p uA_ayra � Zrnr„pn®pn x,a[r,) 4na,.a,S°v nr ur a m wr y, 0 m.�.e aw�•�a win — ma.amrtmrwa� m '�:xr�rae.mraa nm,mina o•i ®�r,..rm.maemo..�.m.,u... ' w•,a '�� N mwo vcm o.nam ®�+m':;w ov.awes,[.esus n..m a ti ..e..w.awe,. . ea... .an v waa mo,aou � � m,yw�rr�mm ac:,r®xa a��:.',i m. •n�.a m,ar.r.pa,�r6,w Q000¢rrrra /naa raaso curaara mr aawpa mmrcac 8�I� © n,�en vww acv p.as,.0 ua;insa w m.os,x wa svm a w wvn mm.., Saari�yremoo.+>woo° C 9 ¢wrir arb0v ra'sm:�,i u,wn a asi,M-n. Fs_'q uumnm.,umc Hua s.ro a �v,QaT,o1O�rm�im�.om�n.ew - ® r mra�w wv.r.m¢ra vv.ra '�Van.• w�[wp mess reruns m,o mwm mwn���n�sa�_ r W ,o m�nR roves�uaeu mxammmuuuw ,ww m M, wooar N inR,atmr,r.,4 m w R m u 4l as[a moan uapf aawa,tux r u.m sw,m,ow,rr.a,+m a non s r�swr m ama saws m w,an�xa}�u�snm n rm a w.wo axrma � mo[oaa.ar,r®a r®m s¢v n,,r m. samima m�rmm a ava,a ua,a m pr�srummamwnns wwn�.r.ar.op¢�ra _ _ m �— s • masa rr,.. r -r�o pn r,'varom sm,w ' Amax.m.usr..u.w.m,n,r ' m"""mtM1 ND1S,mrr am rpuo ,iaoar�arim'ai,i a,r.wu Wasi � amwio v,ws.. you daxaa''aar®'u i i¢m us a'�"mmsx 4i ©rmm r u.m r,c•sa m vn•.wa w m[aac uimmoe'onr1°wimm'�ar nm,m ra.o racriprs tame: ma,ranAm turasrv.mev.oa sr.>��ass o, s ��� swm�r samara,mar m1O°O agmen-:��"°°ipw n:n:;i.u`�wn, aps aps rss u sM�n. �' .am yam w ra m...ae.cmas maaw,[atmw rc[a m a„ rres v am sa iwea ,°"`a,ani'�.nom r s w oro.a,nmo no nor,may..'.c�.o^ [gm,s vv��c ua r a..,a u,vn-,r. s I t•Drop a rceo a asrsc.s svx-.: >• maw a m w'OX'°r'ntp1�"" m wo r n.r.sas a..a mr ar.m n e r,.n,, ®�0 P° .�rnr�a.m a,mri.:iiw u:r••w-•• v p D was retro am.m r®r ay.....v,,.n. swnm p�..m �'a ,rare-a.v..n a.at ax av:.a ret u ®,m� as ret ar..mesa res o[rra. n.p,.ar„[,mamr p,m.rw PREPARED FOR a.w«mnr.wananma,.m,aw,wa a,...r.amasa.awv.aweatvanam. cv.ssa.macvn.nam. BENCHMARK COMMUNRIEB wwween,Wa.aa a,.r m,a.mu [an+r.aama.a tux.vsrtvmmm. ream,mamav.ms,suer.,s aom v svasres mn,uc m'°'°"�,i'.ar nu[e nm n.me raw[ret rs rs. ®�,wx., .aomoe w.ae,wo a aa.a n®a,mw.a.,n ®qu,yr„n um�wwrm[.nwcsvvaamr PREPARED BY mmmaaartn.a:.na raarm.rearaa,m �.�r�,�ArA ra'�-,;.m aK .avr�.�."`r"' tun ro��arnw asragr[su mraw,T uuamwmma tun xr.,wma r e a ea,[d n sin[.atv n ria .vr.-a arcs a swans � sawouwaam prooawaw rmrmaa,t n.at srr.maam. vnv.rone amwwra vawna u.n�.0 �;r,�anr°wpn a.oa,woo.tux s.[a.,...a •. aawaa.. m„art/'mcg."a�"'amar"a°v<'$,'�Ya,:'amaa mwu`,m+i,..maaeanmr..arw. am mm.a;amm'w:a::n`�ar'..°o w.m. a[smarm wom,A m tsaswp ssarr av am uvmn sat¢ bra am.roes,vo[er. REVISED:NOVEMBER 24. 2014 DRC 2014-00620 TRACT No. 16226-2, LOTS 1-95 b RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES SUBDIVISION MAPi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sheet 12 of 23 ,vnevramNAw.u•,,ys,a, 91R,,p,a a>,m• 91QT•a,a••sn• aa,r•w' cwa r-,m mem m een,oe save saes .m-svgs-r I ���� __ •Arsra ovri.e.................. _....-sll¢+p.................I.-- WK ..__ ....�.. s•m.. i.. •,�sa --ew''i `�_� • w[ r yl. i � r •INax-prr aaaOl-- `___y_____� � va.4`S 7e \ ®�Ib q I ° y.: •,m q y . T y N•o-oox a•" •.n � 6i aenN •7 N un nm m'mNmnNy � m ��' d u i I r a Ig a q aD=' i yl 1I q 1 WCm��� �,�.�A�•� �.��— � m R a, R �1t N le „ TT - . _ . „ �j� • Ir - leii s ti 91 co q�qI�• �• _ __ _ fil• e.um•ar•Nv a. � ,PkB••••ars,-i• "� , :: ° �— �1� i('� � � �4 J 'L t J�a1�11- m ��.W.a7r>ouar--•�/i k f0 m mG»Lqq i --o _ ,tCl�/I was aw nn a•m+ —PTn _ -'�: - es.0 a:`a u' r—ss.(C-A-��*� • raa ane►q \\ 1L—LLllL11L��LLL������i/ �N•1� L — --- •ar OR1t••IIIC.•D —��/� 60lINDA.=. eUF71/!1( p�mM mlv o..o�.orl�'��`awR I ImYnln,m r,roa s,IRrR 'pmaR raaiN ra•as aar waewo N.m«wR ----- ---- -- -- --- -- — ------------------------- INDEY MAP — • 1' x,mlw.msn.v w.rt in am.ean . .:q i evnm a �jv..a w.uaoo.�o w�wsa mrn�e °"°:i.v,:.. ss•�Iwo au•.mw Iw Nwq w„•e soar / _ PREPARED F01� BENCHMARK COMMUNMES ��' Q �.aaaw.�Y.•..s.,.wq.•.� a e. �•• ��.•.a••so..aa a..ae....rwoo: %/ .,m.aeNr.on a•Ir..e �sw.la,T+,� �— :o e•e „mmea:•c�w•,ew9.Rswma PREPARED a- wam� i I rm„s.Isles�oaomwmm n..als re••,.o.am „'-�'s � �m`�.i}m uiwmi'•r n.�m rr•`i,'a�+,�sa ... � — 10 I p p.wRwc®mrw sm�aaw.waa aomum � A )� fWN UMOmtR SL sa sxur,M rUNW W 71samAY rvaan wwnoYl INlls nm ea•p er7mms s,a e,m,.rm ooa ql. •m_ _ �`^°'°"•m°`""""'�4 a""r R"" °a REVISED-NOVEMBER 24,2014 DRC 2014-00620 TRACT No. 16226-2, LOTS 1-95. RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES SUBDIVISION MAI' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE 1o23 .. I XI 31 wff 37 AMP W. ---- ----- - ---- v or 2 20 2S 1 24 41 15 16 0 le • to -- Ore ---- ---- ------ 'All2, 5 –11.1.— pm m7 ff) 2 PREPARED FOR BENCHMARK COMMUNMES PREPARED BY' w m2 RR m 21 2 1" REVISED.NOVEMBER 24,2014 DRC 2014-00620 TRACT No. 16226-2, LOTS 1-95 RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES SUBDIVISION MAPi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sheet 14 of 23 6,Rax)Di Ii OI[[t• 6MQT.m i!•n[Lre I� 7l[ ay. .' Inn; ems ran v+i]r.a rw va oma ew rca[r.a x In1�Tr bnm mm wG O.i x K+t)a.Yal "a nx nr w+ nrnr aar SEE nt evnw I InNr mm ras m o + I nm @6 O,T IlLm a W.tlrl r[[s•mia . (ares sonar wv rmsr .ram wr N en v l+•m6 mmV o•+M K tufa R mr R 10•VIO aart++s+v+r rww YY�4O m Q®O 31m9 LL n/Ir-p. rV 41—S1 .laaA-+x+90•,p+m06 rRM1r aa.4r1-•r. ------ ---- ------ M____ •l•rtaf a 3.......... ............................... OWL--- P--n��T •mrtlr• rry+n� y. rtAn'Ql ixlt LOT i RRM' ,� .Y 4. ims 6 ow v�xs��xr ,pit y Z-i _ ____ _________`,rW art • rx , ainaw+mRrruram+ am-n•anvaa Y N - a N s] sx �i st � E �r• ,'I y g 'i 4 • $ iii a , � t 41m am c _ _ __ _= nro__-rme.- __rs6= _ .�r lmp p �K `gym o'aik^ • e •msr �� r mr + r�l.p0im p1ry[ ` •4.r •in,r ; J ���-2'_!__ _____�,._i xma ✓nwX Fi,sm xm Ip •+�rsr•tm ___ rl 4•� a�r7G -t•vms[ � A 0 _ __ i' p a• 'fit t 47 i �+m_—_'wim]`+ax _ _ _ _ _________ ___ ____xem=_== _ te�__ __==»x=___ =oer_=___==___wa__________� � •' y,r A •is°� r @- a „ u .I a n ar - a•a�aJVi,„ � /_.., bh/`'g "Ap Ag� a _ Ia N q w d�t r� J �i!w+3W6 Es J REN S' a T>vuYl •mrtxr• 1raDf:'�, 4 b 01 `4n!Ir a.s ,w 'a�x n. c. yr s5`A'•r e • a�, � !�.7 e :� - C • • �p 'rrr r rtrlr m r. rir + "eRr•e�xi= 4 . •pYl�,.li d Fxam l.+w O e +�'tf"pPyv 'I:.,IanwrELIEa 1 ' rr r 27 a 33 to w (1 q M � ID c y;�aY4 Er y � _ ___ 5 .ax�� _ao E ' •'.\'v ./ ti'•e�+a- �\\ q r ..gw..,q oy a ;iy+u 9 i naa Ile m,arm 1=1 v=Jl V Tro". ------------- ———————————— ————————-------—————————--- —————————————— - ------------ jj;;;; --- 7; 7 7 -- ---- -- 71- -—-—-—-—-—-A m r, .7- zw _____vim____ ----- z 67 G p p SC Iy p p 53 p p N C� -------- C3 a 4%6 SW am O \� \ I I � I I I I I � // N / PREPARED FOR ---- ----------- BENCHMARK COMMUNMES -----—-------- ---------- PREPARED BYr I r ...... smcr, sm t LLq. 11-1—ED NOVEMBER 24, 2014 DRC 2014-00620 TRACT No. 16226-2, LOTS 1-95 RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES SUBDIVISION MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sheet 16 of 23 >rQ11 11 m It 6Mna 61811 IS!K 1f walla I I I ME V/ 4 6¢v.r tMe e W.8u . 1 rev. tw r.m � i � ,rua w v.6r wrl r.m tae o r van a , v.rw :m nlr , I' Asx °tm ma r m bra I I n.1v � m vmr mm ulr uuwre sea \ � avr \ u lvra.l i \,a Prtlw,mP wma,Ow,Pwran, I \ ,tMtlun limn arP,w tlwT WIPP aarm ®a�mtsSPalmatrartirNl�l. cna-m m mr s awm w wNr rl.N�-w. --------------------- ------—————————————————n taj ---- ra Un. 1 4 ve a y r yt4 71 76 IS / G�Ilrl n`JI v,rm' .W.94 ma \\ \\ Www It ti \ q= _ - •. .�--rt`�t'rr ;_ei gp 4�'; �'�B �r�rae�' .Aa• �rj'0�,�k ,�,�1 L�, /\ a�'�\ . � A`�4 ' t• • m•-'-�rwn�raaa. Ill q`� '" pV �!�` O`= �k�, / \ ,\\ p •+rt Li �,� .i v 1�R'® t+++' , q _ r•116. �e�gr Wi'at'r �w�sw�,r.r.m� .SSia �;tSy'� q bsy'I' • ',' a \ B�t r+i _ All' N el p' .9 ,,ay` E '.� Ir{G n {.� n ''* n n °A i�' •.t ��' �\��}\\\ 3 ' .��•°' 3 / ,ter.. n + ��r' �° a t �pr� � j PREPARED FOR / tt •Sw' i \ / ester an twra harmoBENCHMARK r"� PREPARED BY: REV. BMW REVISED NOVEMBER 24,2014 DRC 2014-00620 TRACT No. 16226-2, LOTS 1-95 -RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES.� SUBDIVISION MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CAUFORNIA Sheet 17 of 23 mm"T 92. — EEE-7_U J L_ hill „ air No.ry LW SEE SHEET No.20 L.A.D.1N.P.PROPERTY /VACANT SEE SHEET No.21 '.Ir...r...IOILIII...............111..r.11..I..1......1.r.r....Ir......I..ILr11.............I.........rrlll. r..LL,,..Ulrr..U........................1 1EELEL,,,,,,L..rr..r................U.....ur...U.1..0„Urn,uUIILIIIIIIII IIUIIIUIIIIII.......LLL...........U.r..........r1.uU............n.....r..1 2]50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 75 59 8p 81 82 63 64 85 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 7374Lr ----ALA BREVE 7g c'u 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 94 93 92 91 90 89 is 87 86 85 84 83 78 7 `0 82 ` 79 / 5) 31 27 2g 33 34 35 61 LOT Cy V o 32 36 / z \ 8U IN, 00 30 23 28 25 24 22 21 20 19 \ � w 18 uuj — 16 Z 9 13 14 15 16 17 / TRACY M. 227-2 11 12 j L TA G f � LEGEND UTILITY CONTACTS E 3 2 1 � X11! TexreanmBr COrtARAaUnT'CO.PAtRsuBfBVAEa.:r.WYqunLrVAloEswAllPl 7 6 5 4 vBwEn eB nowt �_GABRyUIELL VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ZT ••Cats••• vAotuvnox rrweASELLxExommxsmrcmx W =sa= slaw oxAa SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY rw.nmas. ce. uta uw 'ml'T"vm�:�u ilroE wm.:uossww. "i 101 CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT CxignrJsrl SBL. SfUAGINE .FIeNIBFANMCM0.aN BArmoLlx.�w.oAG mm PREPARED FOR aB. G0.MEBRFA( METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT noB.w.n rn.L.cxfxa.xoxn BENCHMARK COMMUNITIES 7RA 'r a —1 ` a RR wAn u fms,G sus. -m Gua-1. . ra reasxevvnf SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY .Be.CnsasS. 1n .,,.EOie'n.x l.C. Tovor— . iaovooBAxfMIF Corr BENCH MARK a `v. BAWSLr11r f91R"1O"}%1 MARKS ca ION Rr u;o EPARED OEM cTr of RANCHO CUCAMONGA YR A UlfBxlRBI D. Nd 1aWT 0.MGe WGYBBGGs.IM LRTMAY.MncgGgb..AVla --- 0.gIGxfJLNl UR � •” u � Y1MRR/I.tl9Qlr eY Ie.0 WT do IHI NAIWrtl.451 `n .OVBrFAS1WWU �NX1 ElIWAAL A.aMR. r....e.x a .. � aVxIRxILVeAxnNe -o–Ne aAT161Tl1.E xUee.e, e..-eM.1frARM.xETxlx rU0..L'.UFa.W 'n MiERGMeerO , Ex n]UI. rl 0.0w LEE ,,. LRRLrALL REVISED:NOVEMBER 24, 2014 , If. .RRraB,x.B DRC 2014-00620 Y ETI. ��1rgFLMLrI TRACT No. 16226-2 LOTS 1-95 �f C.ID[. amisLRoawrE4cF.Ex. r RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES >o NOTE: ROUGH GRADING PLAN SHEET INDEX THIS SITE'S ROUGH GRADE° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sheet 18 of 23 Op��O��!// �.} r ii til-• • • 77 � I ..� ..I� I "1r �U�7p 1 Y •m ^I�I/�/.- f7� �'r•V����'r. 1��\\\. I,:. I. ^ � �Ilj�1'1C�1Yii�ii�S•. � __-�� 1��./�>t�/ pow. �I�'. �� �I�SV.Is ���R�L�3-�\ 'i.�•�^"�� s.�� -... LIP,,�?i — IIII ,. r A i IIA I 1 I. Jf 1 ,I t , 6 I d� I Uu♦ I :hi 17J'rii, Aiik1 , -r �1 9� �S �r'iR�l ►" /i.: ..rel 1F�le, ���//•jam —�.�t = ..��. ti � \ ,� ��//// rt � P _ _ � � Pti C■JII � � • • • � • fWA 4 rN 1 4— leo M, -^-�' �\1�`- -ice� \= ���='/: ' -� ,---`,�1 �\�.,_J�.� --�� , , 4A cm ROUGH GRADING LEGEND CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1675 MELMIM C.D. PREPARED FOR gm-, -r- BENCHMARK COMMUNITIES SBL PREPARED 13Y'- kp FME 'P. REVISED:NOVEMBER 24,2014 DRC 2014-00620 Fl. TRACT No. 16226-2, LOTS 1-95 Wder�LRANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES -El ML. ZE L.W C.L.E. ROUGH GRADING PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sheet 20olI23 I LEGM - --------- it: CO. KL i IT SML -4� CIL cmmtJal 0!@5 TA laVfJAle "Al "C RA F.S. —M� KP. MIEW� D m TA wwlwt FF. lwm� a mf.—1 a PMTE LM CLUX PW.X L.U- ROUGH GRADWO CONSTRUCTION I-�06191 M 111,C)CAF -7f 0 M7. PREPARED MR BENCHMARK COMMUNMES FRIEFARED REVISED NOVEMBER 24,2014 DRC 2014-00620 TRACT No. 116226=2, LOTS 1-95 RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES ROUGH GRADING PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sheet 21 of 23 O • 711 Z OEM=A•A •ems®� •Iwoiu , ffOBO11 A-A aE.'IOI B•! PSE__ CTgN__n TYIGI MMAND KO! .u�••enm.n...R.o�Rm: ....ao.e.�.. !tr .c,.., Mrt: SECTION® . NMI Y 1�_� AC.mBOIm Pie..�i,�.�..�s�i.R ..•.w V ,0� � fWIVEN Dwm MAN .QIIbPae m�vsi.0 aesus®.ems �'®,O`7aR+ • ,,�F fnw I V m ���'- --- . A'>) TRANBIIION TO,P6B P 1 r S awd¢ - ------r•.q !e-Rsn.va '�• 2) �osa sl.a.os•ooc _ ® IVN K 1O1irt. '�•sI ORAN E _ Fav m.�a ow¢�°mfwu.ru ne aR+cvw s6fOlA-A TERRACE DRAIN . ��m �a1MCB QI11N AID RDnN onAN P A-1 wle�vl ms BETAL R wnwr�.w .A rs.u•eu `e O4I rrwwa r• .` I GOMOOA n•� --------- - ---- ------ - N ~ eEOTmON O „®ra z e ewn- ..** J .. SECTION O a,s ,a,s, 4 Mp1a.u.oemP`mxi•••emR P Iv Ars:. rut eEOTM +�— PREPARED FOR BECTON ® ^AOR°A.r aR°re" BENCHMARK COMMUNMES R IIP! �� m.iNls Mli aoxo PREPARED BYT r.ew. k Iaa + �e REVISED NOVEMBER 24,2014 e •��•• - -----� ® DRC 2014-00620 Ty, CAL BEOTICN A• P TRACT No. 16226-2, LOTS 1-95 RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sheet 22 of 23 AaRAmIrArVA-R,R.VMr •. rr ��a - .— r yw MOWN � •�tli r .ra.•�w••.• Iwmmaa �BECTION #• TVPICAL ROl10H OWA SECTION " " LOCAL MAW werAT „yds s •LM manor IE89 THAN N STREET aRAOEe 1 I I „., ,QII..Fr a.••.a IY IGRa W a 9.6r F OFiL mow•M W- . � I IBECl10N©+» ru y --.1�a r 3 r8 w}a .Yp MOF' miF vn r O Ma TYPICAL BECipN Tun �m ` -"'F-.�. :- - _f--- e u•,. WIffT-A-A 6&AIDOE sIREIT 8 ---- - I ....ora aa. rm � BECIIGN s mw cr..ma . w ' , nmm�•g, Mw "T�N�__i• 6ECigN �, s _ g��co�mMrran _ �mO r'�' ♦•va m �r TYPICAL ROUGH SRAM SECTION . IOL STREET VWATO w G1 .oa !OAT FROMM R AND GREATER GTRW ONAOEB r�Isii�Fa mua•Pme] r!3 a 00. PETAL-COH[Xte78 clutlE7.�•• eruwAr a EXAMAN (-�j BBaTN DO `G r III GECnM r 4. BETAL w ORAim TRAHBn1GH - PREPARED FOR •cvuTe IIETe TEFMCE°A"N BENCHMARK COMMUNMES xm•mwxc.ww Ma n• 0 Ed PREPARED BYR REVISED NOVEMBER 24,2014 DRC 2014700620 TRACT.No. 16226-2, LOTS 1-95 RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES CONSTRUCTION NOTES ANDDETAILS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SANSERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sheet 23 of 23 .wRunwawo-w,,.�uA, M RANCHO x M ETIWANDA 7n City of Rancho Cucamonga, California December 16, 2014 REGIONAL MAP PROJECT DATA SHEET INDEX Required Floor Plans and elevations for 95 Lots �. w•.4xunN 2. Roden.l IHaar plan North Ebw Prn•rw Evsm Specific Plan Rancho • • J. ROHencel l son to an Ebvalbn 1 • •• he•Na.RP1w,PM•Rm9A••RwaaMq.al 1. R.:W"ce l l R.t,hn,—fian w/poeeh aPllaru (q v Rquvy Ew+bm•Io,MM,/1be,M 5. Res drmcell Ra.E -11an ,`//`��/" ` 9nMee pnXf•1.40w•Um•IfMn MnpeFrl�Fln•bn• Br NeN euvryeY Nve.ar•,tiu weBcmn9urllm•1 d. Rafldtuae RaricM1Eln "'flan a9 opllnnr i L RmMenee 118ungolnw=Wn . EY• ,Rrt•r c+M1aaw+ area R. RarYJancel Run9obw EkvaMn wl Patch aplMns PYnI 9 RofMenctll Rool Pbm Kaaren:2l Floor Plops L�at 11. ResMence 2 l San Juan EMvalbn Pram 4 11. R.==2 l$an Juon Ebvollon w/patch upXom +I• Rn4 4 IJ. R."' a..11 Ran ch EF.vellbbn RUMence 2l Roneh Ebvan w/patch nplanr Is. pagan2 Banaabw EMvaMa I l In. Re, ncancb Bungalow FbvaMn w/patch oPllons y V. ResMence 2l RoaRbm R , lars Residence 1 One Story2,689 SF I8. RetMent,.J SthnpanP-a M. RmNmce 3 I San J an frbvalmn M. ResMence J l San Lean Ekvalpn w/parch ophanr 21. Rescan¢3 l Son Juan Ebvalbn w/patch opham VICINITY MAP Residence 2 TWO Story3,272 SF 22. Raricl . Ran Joon EbvaMnw/posh aPMm 23. Re art., Ranch Eka.flet. 25. Retaeace 3 l Ranch fbvolbnw/path nplbrn 25. Zith"ce 3l Ranh EkvaMn w/Poch apllom Residence 3 TWO Story 3,693 SF n. e,Ma ei eu ahp ew°°la^palm apw r 2B. Raceme3 Banpabw Fbvahan w/patch opMnt 29. R.I.—3l Banpalmv Elevotbn w/pmrh.,Mn, 311. RascencbS unaobw fbvolbnw/pamhopllons Residence 4 Two Story 4,055 SF Reacencel Rnnlpbm 32. Rasaenr. IPba Pbn •. • 3a Re,aena.l I Ran Juan Ne—fl.n N. RnMence 4l Ran Juan:=p` w/Porch oplbm i5. Resaenr:e4 son Juan EhvcK. w/porch nplbas 36. Fe,Idrrme 4l Ran ch 1"'1,W, 3L Rmpencb4l Ranch Ebvalbn w/patch npllom hr Raskencal l Rorrch Fbvalbn-/patch eplbm 39. Ra,pance 4 l Monbrey Ebvalan 10. 1.U. e11 Monlmey No—Kan w/Parch nplbm 41. ReAtlenca 4 l Monleray Ehvalbn wl parch opllnns _ 41 Resaance 1 I Pant PM., 43. Calor Pat 44. Cebr Patellas 4s. cola r.1. IR, talar Poblle, --- - --- -------- - ----- - p r ' „ 1 ID ' Residence 1 2,689 SF UCP Right Side Elevation h MATERIAL NOTES FOR SAN JUAN ELEVATION STYLE RoaE Concrete'S'Tile Exterior Materials Smooth Sand Rnish Stucco —.---- "�' Root FRch 4:12 Archilectarol Details-OO Decorative stacked the gable vents, L v'Ity �`I-'tid� Rake Dimension:6" ®shed root"awning"with decorative wood braces, Eaves Dlrne m 12" ®stylized corbels, D stucco window head and 911 hun, Garaae Doors Style specific courage door ®exposed rafter talls.®carriage style garage door. Leff Side Elevation - n, . hi ^..': .•,.SLS. �-�,,t,4N ✓/ l III ♦ � + Rear Elevation Scale:1/8" =w^ Residence Scheme Residence 1 1 San Juan Elevationa�ao L1CI _ iU '. eJ Right Side Elevation 1 � Leff Side Elevation Rear Elevation Scale:iia^ =I.0" Residence 1 San Juan Elevation Opt w/ No Porch 1� UCP . , , +� 4 o. ..... r.` Yvl M i Right Side Elevation s.y 4, n. f Eb 717 i 771" 1 a- Residence I Ranch - Scheme 9 Seek:114" 1-0" MATERIAL NOTES FOR RANCH ELEVATION STYLE Lek Side Elevation Exlertor Materials- Light sand stucco,board a batten sidin Roof;Concrefe'Slate'Tile 9 g Roof Pitch:4:12 Architectural Delalls:©Decorative louvered gable vents, Rake Dlmenslon:18" ©builtout gable with board&batten siding,®louvered Eave Dimension-24" shuHers,®stucco window head,lamb and sill trim, Garage Doom:Style specific carriage door ®carriage style garage door. Rear Elevation Scale:118" =1-0" Residence 1 Ranch Elevation ti� Right Side Elevation W Leff Side Elevation .v P fur Rear Elevation Residence 1 Ranch Elevation Opt vv/ No Porch 1� UCP • • r� Right Side Elevation 1r._b.. l h. .rf _ . .i Residence 1 Bungalow pp '' r Leh Side Elevation MATERIAL NOTES FOR BUNGALOW ELEVATION STYLE Root Conaete'Slate'file E#edor Materials- Light sand stucco,shingle siding,stone Roof Pitch,4:12 Architectural DetaBs:D Decarafive beams and brackets at Rake Dimension,24" gables,®stone wainscot and at porch column bases. CD Eave Dimension:24" wood shingle siding, cp stucco window head,jamb and A Garage Doors:Style specific carriage door trim,®wood window head,jamb and sill trim,®dual post columns.M carriage style garage door. Rear Elevation Scale:1/8" =1-0" Residence 1 Bungalow Elevation 1� C?' �a' ' Right Side Elevation F W C Left Side Elevation Rear Elevation scale:tie^ Residence 1 Bungalow Elevation Opt w/ No Porch ti• UCP r v � n -- y 7 San Juan Ranch Bungalow Residence 1 Roof Plans UCP ! �. o C / - - - - - ------- ------------------- ------------------- 11 J L9 U rq M 19 r`1 q 3 _ R I Upper Floor 1 ,590 SF Main Floor 1 ,682 SF Residence 2 3,272 SF UCP ' • D C —1111"O'noo, COP 10 CJ V i) T q t ip Right Side .i ii Iii■ Li :� Elevation ,c Residence 2 San Juan - Scheme 6 soale:va.. =,.p••. MATERIAL oth nd Finish Stucco •Roof Ffich-4:12 Archrto,tyral Details-O •-• -conal.s, rd •. Rak,Dimension 6" plank shutters,x o stucco vyindow head Eave Dimension-12" and sill trim,Fi exposed rafter talls,(D yvrought ron detail Garage D.�x, Style specific c.m.g.doorecarnage style garage door. Left Side Elevation VC Rear Elevation Scale:1/8" 1(Y' �.s Residence 2 I San Juan -Scheme 6� Porch sale:Ua.. =Ln- Residence • n Juan Elevation UCP Ji. CaliPorm:a Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation Left Side Elevation Left Side Elevation - � Rear Elevation Scale:IIF =i-0^ Rear Elevation Scale:1/8" =14' Opt w/ No Porch Opt w/ Lower Porch Only Residence 2 1 San Juan Elevation Options 1 UCP . i Right Side Elevation 1Ranch - Scheme 10 Leff Side Elevation MATERIAL NOTES FOR RANCH ELEVATION STYLE ^ RJ:Concrete'Slate'Tile Exterior Material Light sand stucco,board&batten siding Roof Pitch:4:12 Architectural Details:®Decorative louvered gable vents, Rake Dimension:18" ®built-out gable with board&batten siding,®louvered Eave Dimenslom 24" shutters,D stucco v4ndow head,Iamb and sill Mm, Gataae Doors-Style specific cartage door ®wood railing,®carriage style garage door. C: `� to Rear Elevation Scale:1/8" =1-0' Residence 2 Ranch Elevation �itT UCP • ETIWANDA I Cucamonga. v Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation I Leff Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation 1 -r _ x Rear Elevation Scale:iia^ =1-0' Rear Elevation Scale:iie„ =1-0•, Opt w/ No Porch Opt w/ Lower Porch Only Residence 2 Ranch Elevation Options 1� UCP Vis: X14 F. Right Side Elevation + e r x L '✓ L. Leff Side Elevation MATERIAL NOTES FOR BUNGALOW ELEVATION STYLE Root:Concrete'Slate'Tile Exterior Material- Light sand stucco,shingle siding,stone Root Pilch-4:12 Architectural Details©Decorative beams and brackets Rake Dimension:24" at gables,®stone wainscot and at porch coWmn bases, Eave Dlmenslon:24" ®wood shingle siding.0 stucco window head,jamb and Garage Doors:Shoe specific carriage door sill trim.©wood window head,jamb and sill trim.0 woad rating,®cordage style garage door. Rear Elevation Scale:LIB" =1-0" Residence 2 Bungalow Elevation Zt� FJ ' ' ` # 15� G Q Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation 4f Leff Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation IBM, A X Rear Elevation k.I.:iia• =w" Rear Elevation S'aie:1/8" =1-0,. Opt w/ No Porch Opt w/ Lower Porch Only Residence 2 Bungalow Elevation Options UCP ::. s s , ,r San Juan Ranch Bungalow Residence 2 Roof Plans 1 UCP. . . ^-.. • ... cam- --------------.:. r r . -- -- -- - ----- _ I I nxti Svan tix.n mr, _ Upper Floor 1 ,749 SF Main Floor 1 ,944 SF Residence 3 3693 SF UCP ETIWANDA `. 11/} T 1 •• _ ,pMn.4e!IMMjI�'4o1s18lYA1l �111111i11�i111�1 � I� R.... Right , _ Elevation � , ,�•. �+��++an1111111i'f tlllll��lh�lllgll w�r�-tfwo , Residence 3 I San JuaIf n - Scheme 7 sole:rin^ =r-0•• MATERIAL NOTES FOR SAN JUAN ELEVATION STYLF 122L Concrete'S'Tile Malerict Smooth Sand Finish Stucco R.Ql Pitch-4:12 Architectural Detalb- Decorative stacked file gable vents, Rake Dimension,6" © .- o = En"Dirntmsi.in,ITT decorative wood braces,0 stucco Window head and efill Garage Doors- Style specific carriage door trim,`i turiposed rafter falls.I)cordage style garage door� Leff Side Elevation Ip Rear Elevation Scale:1/8" =I-0" o ,M'b.-•erg!} 3y.•s�a••`-rrrn!• Residence 3 San Juan • Scheme 7 Enhanced Courtyard s�o�:l,a• _�-0^__ Residence • n Juan Elevation " ETIWANDA .,,`" " Gucamongo, CaliFcrnlc Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation Oc Leff Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation _ �g g F'it V - r. _...._ MP-A j r -is- Rear Elevation SC6. ue =1-o Rear Elevation aie ve^ =1.0" Opt w/ No Porch Opt w/ Lower Porch Only Residence 3 San Juan Elevation Options V = UCP R,F- ! ETIWANDA C „ ...,.. io..r.+.ex.a..rua oat izom. N 4 + Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation "'yam Leff Side Elevation Leh Side Elevation Rear Elevation scale:118" =f-0" Rear Elevation Scale:fia^ =f-o^ Opt w/ Upper & Lower Porch Opt w/ Lower & Side Porch Residence 3 San Juan Elevation Options UCP 21 iro Right Side Elevation Left Side Elevation Rear Elevation lie„ =1-0" Opt w/ Side Porch Only Residence 3 San Juan Elevation Options UCP • • D Right Side Elevation za-= i ]�llI I,JII TIII Ill ly U s � � � .n ' rrIAResidence 3 1 Ranch - Scheme 11 Scale:1/4 I r Left Side Elevation MATERIAL NOTES FOR RANCH ELEVATION STYLE Rool:Concrete'Slate'Tile Exterlor Material- Light sand stucco,board&batten siding Roof Pitch:4:12 Architectural Detaits:®Decorative louvered gable vents, Rake Dlmenslon-18" ®built-out gable v4th board&batten siding,®louvered Eave Dimension-24" shutters,®stucco window head,jamb and A him, Oaraae Doors,Style specific carriage door ®carriage style garage door. Rear Elevation Scale:1/8" =I-0'• Residence 3 Ranch Elevation UCP D nom. Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation n r � Leff Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation i (. Tall X' . Rear Elevation Scale:1/8" _1-0" Rear Elevation Scale:ue^ =w^ Opt w/ No Porch Opt w/ Lower Porch Only Residence 3 1 Ranch Elevation Options 1� UCP • D 2� Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation Left Side Elevation Left Side Elevation 10 Til+ i 11 A Rear Elevation Seale:1/8' =1-o" Rear Elevation Scale:l/B" =1-0" Opt w/ Upper & Lower Porch Opt w/ Lower & Side Porch Residence 3 1 Ranch Elevation Options UCP ETIWA N D ' J I C m«..a. .ws.,...... ivu... LV Right Side Elevation 1 l� Left Side Elevation i i Rear Elevation Sc01. 1/8" =1-0" Opt w/ Side Porch Only Residence 3 Ranch Elevation Options } /^•�/, UCP ice.- lle Ii / . I Right Side Elevation n. . rte. T.P F n r _ `I r• �I I I ,k --- - - - _ _ -- --- r Left Side Elevation MATERIAL NOTES FOR BUNGALOW ELEVATION STVL R93D Concrete'Slate'Tile Exterior Material Light sand stucco,shingle siding,stone Root Pesch:492 Archilectural Detallls ©Decorative beams and brackets Rake Dimension 24" at gables,©stone wainscot and at porch column bases, Eave Dimension:24" ®wood shingle siding,®stucco window head,jamb and Gataoe Doors-Style specific carriage door sill trim,®wood window head,jamb and sill Mm,M cor- dage style garage door. till Rear Elevation scale:vB" =1-0" Residence 3 Bungalow Elevation 1� UCP -1 -45MO ETIWANDA -77p .. California A•.ngvcl x.rMr�.R...,.la>oI. 7 Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation i - Rear Elevation same:ue^ =i-o^ Rear Elevation 1/8" =1-0" Opt w/ No Porch Opt w/ Lower Porch Only Residence 3 I Bungalow Elevation Options Z� UCP rtq ; c -® 28 • _ r. Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation Left Side Elevation l r. I Rear Elevation scale:ve•• =w" Rear Elevation S'd.:us^ =w" Opt w/ Upper & Lower Porch Opt w/ Lower & Side Porch Residence 3 1 Bungalow Elevation Options UCP ETIWANDA25 Right Side Elevation N _ Leff Side Elevation 1 _ Rear Elevation scale:1/8" Opt w/ Side Porch Only Residence 3 Bungalow Elevation Options USP � • A D A D3C . , of r v r San Juan Ranch Bungalow Residence 3 Roof Plans UCP f 31 - -------, h I eaa. i r O - -- m„ -- I Main Floor 2, 101 SF Upper Floor 1 ,954 SF Residence 4 4,055 SF UCP 32r Yfn3 +V Rig. IEj Right Side Elevation - _ �'� _ �- � i,• Ix 74, A MATERIAL NOTES FOR SAN JUAN ELEVATION STYI /\ 899t Concrete'S'Tile EXterlor MalerlaF Smooth Sand Finish Stucco Roo[RRch,4:12 Amblindumt Details-@ Decorative stacked the gable vents. ( — Rake Dimenslom 6" ®decomfive plank shutters,®shed mot"awning"with Eave Dimension 12" decorative wood braces, +O stucco window head and sill Gamae Doors Style specific carnage door him.®exposed rafter tails,®carnage style garage door. Leff Side Elevation ��i,71►sIt c . Rear Elevation Scale:1/8" =1-0" Residence 4 San Juan Elevation 1M= USP T g 3,� Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation Left Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation Rear Elevation s=aie:ue•• =1-0•• Rear Elevation saala:ids•• =1-0^ Opt w/ No Porch Opt w/ Lower Porch Only Residence 4 San Juan Elevation Options 1� USP - O ' ' "c � 34 Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation —_— — Leff Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation - j Rear Elevation 1/8" =1-0" Rear Elevation s.oie:118" =1-a, Opt w/ Upper & Lower Porch Opt w/ Lower & Side Porch Residence 4 San Juan Elevation Options 17 1 Right Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation MATERIAL NOTE5 FOR BUNGALOW ELEVATION STYLE Raaf:ConcreteSlot.'Tile fatedor Material Light sand stucco,shingle siding.stone Roof RRch:4:12 Architectural Details-®Decorative beams and brackets Rake Dlmenslon:24" of gables.®stone wainscot and at porch column bases, Eave Dimension'24" ®wood shingle siding,®stucco window head,jamb and Garage Daors:Style specific carriage door sill him,®wood window head,jamb and sill trim,®wood railing,®carriage style garage door. `z — r aof fir _ Rear Elevation Scale:l/R" =1-0" Residence 4 Bungalow Elevation tiPM` UCP b' s • D • lDfA Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation 7^ Left Side Elevation Left Side Elevation fir Rear Elevation Ua" =r-0•• Rear Elevation 1-0^ Opt w/ No Porch Opt w/ Lower Porch Only Residence 4 Bungalow Elevation Options 1� uca 37. Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation ANN ire. Rear Elevation oae ue =1-0Rear Elevation ate:us.. =i-o• Opt w/ Upper & Lower Porch Opt w/ Lower & Side Porch Residence 4 1 Bungalow Elevation Options . 3�UCP .,..,.. ". . .. . D ' Right Side Elevation 17. Residence 4 Monterey - Scheme 14 Scale:1/4" l-D" a _ , J Leff Side Elevation MATERIAL NOTES FOR RANCH ELEVATION STYLE A22L Concrete'STile Exterfor Material: Imperfect smooth stucco Roof Pfch:4:12 Architectural Details:®Decorative conales, ®decora- Rake Dimension:24" five louvered shutters,m vvood balcony,beams,and railing. Eave Dimension:6" ®stucco vAndov,head and sill frim,m exposed raker talk. Garage Doors:Style specific carriage door ®cartage style garage door. wig III Pr . Rear Elevation Scale:1/8" =1-0" Residence 4 Monterey Elevation 1� UCP E T I W A N . . 35 0PpoMonga, California Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation i C-z* Leff Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation Rear Elevation scale:ue•• =1-0•' Rear Elevation Scale:l/B'• =1-0•' Opt w/ No Porch Opt w/ Lower Porch Only Residence 4 1 Monterey Elevation Options ti• slin 4C mm Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation Leff Side Elevation r, 'Fir1T 111 . Rear Elevation me:1/8'r i-o" Rear Elevation Opt w/ Upper & Lower Porch Opt w/ Lower & Side Porch Residence 4 Monterey Elevation Options UCP F r t A J,�:: 41 1 L San Juan Ranch Monterey Residence 4 Roof Plans T w D • lift r UCP ;� 11�J..� ('0101 Palettes ONES Color Palette.q e.d•emimn s.r.er ni. rwxr.sn.xwx.wunomr emx.�edw�.an.x. ..er.,e.o1. Scheme 1 . Scheme 2 Scheme 3 Scheme 4 Bungalow Bungalow Bungalow Bungalow .nxo o xi mmo _J `1 aama I srdxoLA mm max e.ew max e.e� no:.e.a max e.a. .m r V.- � mn I v..a .ems xw,. .. ewe. w,.. •ne oma. vow.,....,wr. ex.=..� Color Palettes UCP • P719 A '} Color Palettes _ NONE Color Palettes ONES Neem.:Ee.I.wlld—S.1d I". a nl znerwimwpl�oma smn,:Clnp.a stone Reolin.:T.O.venae Is.Mcn90 POInlaneMn.WIIPom1 gene:6.—d IT... Scheme 5 - Scheme 6 ® Scheme7 Scheme B San Juan San Juan SanJuan San Juan I 4ee11nB 4ceM,p 4ee1Nq peeM. p Ac cant Botiv cenl0ativ gccenl4anY q-eenl potly nm. Trim Trim Trim �. MCn Bent Stucco Bntly Man eoaY Slviceo BotlY A....I I A--I I A--I I Pccenl l mm", Mn1eNW IMM sem iavgnom a YIF Iq 1, Yp/.n A;, �T—Irrpmr Issu M4 ,uweom MMnaMwbrN 1-- 1-1. A--1 -1 ' 4iAeeifr iwumxv�iv•Y,q �I MTu:rWot NiWm6M1m1. e 1 cm aLrM svr ,a Tx Om nanom v .p^Om Color Palettes UCP. h .. . . • 4 ,1j,- Irrr Palettes ■■p Color Palettes NONE _. ,a'.Bnd.e�ua.n s.r.<r ni. .mmae.r�amvnu.n. smn..c.n<r.a si<n. a<enna�Bn�.Bona.�r sa.<r m. r<im-se.,wa-wnaoWr sen..:cmrw.a aon. Scheme 9 Scheme 70 Scheme 11 Scheme 12 Ranch . Ranch Ranch se` ccenl Beat . inm Mmn seev - -.-�– 1 r.:ir PnY� Mein Beat MUIn Bea s,mna C-11 . aa�.e .,..m r senna •«<nr r �„J ;imnv nl l gccen 1 i mn.ma M1neM1 .mb . a � .aP V.vnM0. FeM1 b• I rer. uy lueMaumW .meee4 , P a®iM'm ww� rMc Aru � � vnan�M {aNp M .McwnYvn t r snm -uv.v+� nay.n� M1�xaeeo.n buee e�Om .ava� av � Pomiiuem �M uw 5M 'wbvnncmimM� ao-vv M.n� oW cvPvrrn emla�z.a �W � �s�m evi6v v+wvm o�ina ru.wA. 'MmNmam Color Palettes UCP i0jrFRO ETIWANDA 4` Color Palette, NEON xoeuw.eom.eonay.sei.m su. .onr.sn.,wm.wie.m, sm�..cmw,m non. Scheme 13 Scheme 14 Monterey . Mont ereY .E) mm rt .. . .. Ma.mer .a..� �oa.mown � ,was ��i..u,noa �� .��, �wo.�wr � �m, �u r.wo.. •• Color Palettes UCP H • ETIWANDA m call X W u a — i xx a w 26. . . 25 v 9 OI NG I e." x,.,�ro.....,....�v,„,..,,.,m. ,....�a-m.........,.�..— O TYPICAL SLOPE PLl..e.,.`W`20 mm=m,o.wE,,,r.ra.,aruv.n>xx," n oW�"ro° � ,....>..°>°.m.....,»,.,p...w.x�.a.. ,,,+>..�.�...>za.e�•f°i ...,.,.,....^�...>nn.. "°.. m 'p m , +ww.iox .,.,...ro,e...............—x.....e,w.>.. ,,�»�.wx�.v,.�......»,�a,."..:a>�.....,.........w... �.,»....,.,ww.e.,,.`,.m:.`>".k w.>,.i........ ..,......w�.ca.".F,.ner»a.>, m.x...M..r rte..ro.,m ....,Y.w.A.-....,..w.�...,....er,.... 1 _ ..... rnn w e..,.w.w.,.v=•.,Aw,.a.,.»w.iro..rcm.ro.n..srowe.,e.ror.e....issi,.m,.m.se.�.::%>s dw+.0 VICINIW MAP T. TR TR 16226-2 : . °.er.._�yM� ,.,., "�� e: `u� 12-23-14 � ` NORM 0 90 160' 400' ebmla CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN ]I�NMMJOYSIRFEi CCRCN/�G YIBJ9 R PCN RFCiOAE Hall]/.11]i i:951.]l].M1551 � w owm Irgil �i .nIYC'rh..Jlr Y��Lrylilu�lr Ili— I•�l �NI .� r1�. ■ ■ �� � Irk ■�Ilr -W S. uir�. �i4 ib l� lttl�� -� 4 .� �•�i7/ •�i� ,i f�-. • ���i U-060-d- !! �f .,q 1l���=`til• "i^�IIE y i Wad rain-. l� ag Fair-rat SEEM, 0 Lo �PHON`�i. �,�` Gliri^�� `' o Dim■0 Mem■0 boo ago IIR�� F-1 f M„s .eM Cry ws.... ...W .I 1 ..,. . . Plan 4 ® ro (corner) o . . ,.e+wxmee�.rv.iy..x�m.0 n....ienemq MM.wu. ..nw.m.pimu,n. � k"� w4 .n,ie...Ps.w¢,mxvm unease, $ ,wp.n.uv�..w,.,.....w,....wn. 2NOTGC m un 2,8 of r 1Talal 16% Um ew ifi%TR I -6 Mcw- _ xE nur,.unuo.. ..,...w-..,.....,,.....�a..,..,«.,.,x.......,n....,o-... o �.e. .r+....., ,...�..a...i,+,.,.. .pie. O u. � � nmenxv n�..p.unasr.ep.m.e..e.,w.w `�" '�( �• �:°�°n.e.n..•.u.uw,...usa.e.,..i.,vg.,........,x.n..Axn.e.w•eve.we nn....,�Me.ae.....wp.a.u.w�+-..u...e '•�•: �e.e.n.�s .n,e V a aAt'sy�--O.e.n ® Plan 1 Plan 2 ® Plan 4 Plan 3 '= 980 of GC 430 sf Tun 4,` 98051 GC 1,410 sf Total 't 044 of GG 0.f Turf 30%TW 6]O of GC at yh' 96051 Total 1.U9 of 440 sl Tun t 229 Total 31%TUR i} 1110 sfTotal VICINITY MAP TR 16226-2 12-23-14 bm[a TYPICAL FRONT YARDS PREPARED FOR BENCHMARK r L A X p 6 C A P f 310NORIN"O ,TREE])CORD 9R8I9 A P CXITECTUAE 7s 951.)3)11241 P"I 737,M155l A m 00 a 4 a d , .mm. Oaaoo-wun � P. •Mwwrr M w,wmmn up )s 0�.y.uiu..tw uupWMt.wiv ZEN a VICINm MAP TR 16226-2 12-23-14 UM Cbmla WALL AND FENCE PLAN ° mrsrunl coarnu.0 9zen PREPARED FOR BENCHMARK ,PCNI1FCl YAf ).95L))L��H�f:951]D.h4{� THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA o DECEMBER 1 S, 2014 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center®rive Rancho Cucamonga, California L,1:r."Y ��� " T, 't11 ti•liii '.ice t1. x -' r /� 7.!!!��- )'i�i:'�G LA:":T:::r ,n2'. j *• 5 {■O• .i/ii-Y.iir:: '1'?a'+i' ';'' ACTION Roll Call 7:00 P.M. Regular Members: Richard Fletcher...X Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett_ Donald Granger X Altemates: Ray Wimberly_ Frances Flowdyshel Lou Munoz 4:i•�:i�Yr?`.= ui�."r��—'w�:'. 3.Zn..?s.'�x. ••�y:,o�w.za�tc.+:n.::^= .101J! ,...'� `iii The following items will be presented by the applicant and/orthelr representatives. Each presentation and r+esuiting period of Committee comment Is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major Issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public Well, any,although the Committee may open the meeting for public Input. A. ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT -MAP A. Approved, SUBTT18508 _CALDWELL LAND SERVICES - A request to subdivide 6.5 acres of land Into 31 single-family lots within the Low Medium Residential District(4-8 dwelling units per acre)of the Victoria Community Plan,located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive-APN:1089-011-04. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. Related uses: Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment DRC2014-mo and Environmental Review and Community Pian Amendment DRC0144'0561. EXHIBITI 1 of3 Item C-79 cpDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA = DECEMBER 16, 2014 B. DESIGN REVIEW DRC201400820- BENCHMARK COMMUNITIES -A B. Approved. request for the anchfbectu al and site plan review of 95 eftle family hones locased within the Rancho EBwands Estates a*Md to Indian Wells Place approdmatsiy 1,800 feet north of Day Creek Boulevard-APN: 1087-071-15. Related case: Tentalive Tract Map SUBT1716226-2. Staff has found the project to be witdn the scope of the project covered by a prior EnvkmnmW Impact Report(State Clearinghouse#88082915 and#98121091 cerfifiad by the City Council on August 1, 2001) and titers are no newenvbonmentel Impacts not already oonsidered In that Environments!Impact Report. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW C. The Committee DRC2014-00232—WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. - A proposal to appy the revisions construct a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 80,989 square feet with made. 105 rooms on a vacant parcel of about 91,000 square feet(2.08 acres) within the Industrial Pai1r.(IP) District, Industrial. Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the Intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street- APN: 0229-341-11. Related file: General Plan . Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Dedwaftn of environmente l impede for Win. D. SIGN PERMIT PERMANENT DRC2014-01054 - MICHAEL ESCHGER D.The Design Review FOR WSS EUROSTAR, INC. -Arequest for 3 wall signs that propose Committee approved larger sign area than allowed in Uniform Sign Program#134 for sub-major the revised Plans- tenants at the Terra Vista Town Center within the Community Commercial (CC) District in the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at 10690 Foothill Boulevard-APN: 1077422-69. 2of3 Item C-80 ® DESIGN REVIEW AGENDA DECEMBER 169 2014 ii4:i';rim.•:.. _ _ .'Y;.:' -�'?-\,:`'. aJ,�Q_i'r: '.T:'ire•--w•-...C:,..y_ - �.t�.... - - - - a.,� ::s:_ None. This is the time and place lar the general public to address the Committee. state law prohlblts the Committee from addressing any Issue not previously Included on the Agenda. The CommRte8 may retake tesAmony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to flue minutes per individual. 7:37 p.m. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administretfire Regulatlons that set an 11:00 p.m.adjbumment time. IfItems go beyond that 6me,they shall be heard only with the owsent of the Committee. i • 3of3 Item C-81 benchmark C0MMUNfITIES NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING REPORT SUMMARY DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00620. A request for the architectural and site plan review of 95 single-family homes located within the Rancho Etiwanda Estates adjacent to Indian Wells Place, approximately 1,800 feet north of Day Creek Boulevard,APN:1087-071-15 1. NOTIFICATION METHOD a. Benchmark Communities held the Neighborhood Meeting from 6:00pm — 7:00pm, on December 1, 2014 in the Creative Corner located at 11200 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. b. Please see attached for the Notice of Invitation. c. Please see attached for Mailing List of those notified/invited. 2. SIGN-IN SHEET a. A copy of the meeting's sign-in sheet is attached. • 3. QUESTION/CONCERNS a. A request for rounded chimney caps was made to prevent the wind damage that rectangular chimney caps may incur due to wind. b. A question concerning the project's expected pricing. c. A question concerning the project's expected build timeline. d. A concern about construction traffic staying on Indian Wells and off of Macon Dr. e. A request to ensure that the siding used on the exterior of the homes will resist fading and deterioration. f. An email concerning the safety of the Plan 3's entry door being set back from the street. Homeowner suggested installing a security gate that faces the street and blocks off entrance to the front courtyard. 4. RESPONSE TO QUESTION/CONCERNS a. The architect has verified that there are no chimney stacks on this product. The fireplaces in Plan 2, 3, and 4 will use a gas vent and Plan 1 will use a shed roof element without a chimney. b. Preliminary pricing will start in the$700,000 and $800,000 ranges. c. Preliminary build timeline shows completion in 2017. • EXHIBIT J uncia,CA 91355 1661.414.1422 Item C-82 benchmark C O M M U N I T I E S d. Indian Wells and Naples Way will be used as the main access points for construction traffic. Trades will be instructed to only use those streets. e. Siding on the exterior of the houses will made with Fiber Cement. This type of siding resists fading and deterioration. f. The design of the Plan 3 calls for a gate and courtyard wall for security purposes. 5. HANDOUTS a. Please see attached for handouts 27200 Tourney Road,Suite 410 Valencia,CA 91355 661.414.1422 1 www.benchmarkcommunities.com Item C-83 bench ark C O M M U N I T I E S YOU ARE INVITED TO A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING You are welcome to attend a neighborhood meeting in order to address questions or comments regarding the following proposed development: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00620- BENCHMARK COMMUNITIES-A request for the architectural and site plan review of 95 single-family homes located within the Rancho Etiwanda Estates adjacent to Indian Wells Place approximately 1,800 feet north of Day Creek Boulevard; APN: 1087-071-15 December 1, 2014 6:00—7:30pm Meeting Location: Creative Corner 11200 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Contact Information Developer: Benchmark Communities 27200 Tourney Road,Suite 410 Valencia, CA 91354 Alex Wong—awong@benchmarkcommunities.com www.benchmarkcommunities.com 661.414.1422 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Dominick Perez—Dominick.Perez@cityofrc.us 909.477.2750 x4315 is-� �_��r"-• :� r.,.. .` "-' ._ , i. ...... .i- -� :•S.�•-^,.�. 27200 Tourney Road,Suite 410 I Valencia,CA 91355 661.414.1422 www.benchmarkcommunities.com Item C-84 1087 00147 0000 Peterson Gail Boyd 5070 Kent Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 D9148 0000 Guerrero Diogenes L 5080 Kent Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 091 49 0000 So Hosung 5090 Kent Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09150 0000 Sortijas Sheryl M 5095 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09151 OD00 Yu A Q 476 Los Altos Ave Arcadia CA 91007 1087 09152 DODO Ituah Mark Po Box 654 Moreno Valley CA 92556 1087 09153 D000 Demichele Kirk 5071 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 091 54 0000 Kee Chiang Wang 12223 Highland Ave#106-627 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 D9155 0000 Chiang Mindy Ming-Yu 1409 Paseo Maravilla San Dimas CA 91773 1087 09156 OODO Boyd Jacob D&Rebecca A 5041 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087.091.57 OOOD Singh Parminder K&Bachittar 5031 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 --._._....._..._...— _ _._.-.... ..— ---..-.._ --.... ------- --.... --- .•. 1087 091 58 0000 Nambiar Sashi&Rijani 5021 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 091 59 0000 Depalma Carl&Debra K 5011 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 091 60 0000 Williams Kenneth Ryan 5020 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 091 61 0000 Gastelum Josi 5030 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09162 0000 Rancho Estates At Etiwanda&Af 37 Lf 2900 Adams St#C25 Riverside CA 92504 1087 1D1 010000 Frangie&Voltattorni 12250 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10102 0000 litchi Yasmin 12260 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 3.087 20103 0000 Kline Michael E 12270 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10104 0000 Hong Glen W 12280 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10105 0000 Sanghvi Mihir K&Divya G 5155 Seagreen Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087101 D6 0000 Pacot Carlo&Olga 5156 Seagreen Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 101 07 0000 Saribekyan Edgar 5162 Crimson PI Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 101 08 0000 Vaughn Ann B 5152 Crimson PI Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10109 0000 Jrb 5142 Crimson PI Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10110 0000 Wang Gang 5132 Crimson PI Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 101 11 0000 Abraham Sunil J&Tina 5122 Crimson PI Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087101.12 0000.. Tong Xiaoling - __— _ _ 5112 Crimson:Pl _ Rancho Cucamonga CA _ 91739 1087 10113 0000 Young Donald 1 Jr&Sonya G 5102 Crimson PI Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 108710114 OODO Anand Sumeet V&Amarinder K 12166 Bisque Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10115 0000 Zhang hall 9633 Norbrook Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91137 1087 10116 0000 Toma Maged 12186 Bisque Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 101 17 0000 Lee Thomas Q&Susan 12196 Bisque Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10118 0000 DeGuzman Magnolia K 12206 Bisque Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10119 0000 Hsu Katherine&Joseph 12216 Bisque Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 101 20 0000. Bafatico Rosalind R&Manuel A 12226 Bisque Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 101 21 0000 Villanueva Jose Ynigo S Jr 12215 Bisque Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10122 0000 Duan Jing 12205 Bisque Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10123 0000 Patel II-14-11 12195 Bisque Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10124 0000 Ma Ben 447 Fairview Ave Arcadia CA 91007 1087 10125 0000 wan Zhong 12175 Bisque Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10126 0000 Reilly Michael J&Nataly 5141 Crimson PI Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 101 27 0000 Wu Hai ping 5151 Crimson PI Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10128 0000 Wu Sung H 5161 Crimson PI Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10129 0000 Inducil.Mike_..- 5158 MagentaCt _ Rancho Cucamonga_., A, - -91739 1087 101 30 0000 Kiepen Todd A&Lasa 5148 Magenta Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 101 31 0000 Swim James 5138 Magenta Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 20132 0000 Li Yongzhi 5139 Magenta Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 108710133 OD00 Tang Hongtian 5149 Magenta Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 101 34 0000 McCaw David A 5159 Magenta Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10135 0000 Thomas Dwayne A 5169 Magenta Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 101 36 0000 Echeveste Jaime 5117 Sepia Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 101 37 0000 Fu Li An 5107 Sepia Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10138 0000 Hsu Phillip 5101 Sepia Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10139 0000 Maglasang Eric W 5099 Sepia Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10140 0000 Gulndi Maher 5097 Sepia Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 101 41 0000 Frohlich Linda 5087 Sepia Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10142 0000 Tomicic Dustin D 5077 Sepia Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10143 0000 Chen Eric 5073 Sepia Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 20144 0000 Kaylor Bradford W 5090 Sepia Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 Item C-85 PARCEL OWNER MAILADDRESS MAILCITY MAILSTATE MAILZIP 1087 05116.0000 County Service Area 70 825 E 3rd St San Bernardino CA 92415 1087 051 17 0000 City Of Los Angeles Po Box 51111 Los Angeles CA 90051 1087 051 18 0000 County Service Area 70 Imp Zone Os-1 385 N Arrowhead Ave#5TH San Bernardino CA 92415 1087.05119 DOOD County Service Area 70 Imp Zone Os-1 385 N Arrowhead Ave#5TH San Bernardino CA 92415 1087 05120 0000 Rancho Canyon Partners LLC 1721 Garvey Ave#H Alhambra CA 91803 1087 05122 0000 Cucalon Jr.Ricardo 12125 Farndon Ave Chino CA 91710 1087 05123 OOOD Chang Sheng H 1140 Singing Wood Dr Arcadia CA 91006 1087 051 24 0000 Southern California Edison Company 14799 Chestnut St Westminster CA 92683 1087 05125 0000 City Of Los Angeles Po Box 51111 Los Angeles CA 90051 1087 05126 0000 City Of Los Angeles Po Box 51111 — _ Los Angel 6x- es CA 9DO51 a---- -- ----...__ _.__... .. 1087 051 27 0000 City Of Los Angeles P6 Bes CA 90051 1087 07114 0000 San Bernardino Co Flood Control Dist 825 E 3rd St San Bernardino CA 92415 1087 D7116 0000 Southern California Edison Company 14799 Chestnut St Westminster CA 92683 1087 07117 OOOD Southern California Edison Company 14799 Chestnut St Westminster CA 92683 1087 081 01 0000 Southern California Edison Company 14799 Chestnut St Westminster CA 92683 1087 09103 0000 Combalecer Jeffrey 12391 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09104 0000 Mar Jonathan G 12401 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09105 0000 Parker Jeffrey A 12411 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09106 0000 Gonzales Gabriel G 12421 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09107 ODOO Narimatsu Eric 1 12431 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 091.08 0_000 Hoo Sara T S Po Box 53056 Lake Arrowhead CA 91739 1087 091 D9 0000 Martinez Johnny 12421 Macon Dr __ Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91739_ 1087 09110 0000 Lee Won P&Hae 0 12441 Macon Or Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087.091 110000 Nolasco Jaime _ 12451 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09112 0000 Munoz Rodolfo Emanuel 8&11&0 12450 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09113 0000 Marinas Rex P&Jennie A 12440 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09114 0000 Fundacion Granada LLC 12430 Macon Or Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 69115 0000 Navarro David 8 1242D Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09116 0000 Nknj Cacucciolo 1-30-0712410 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09117 0000 Zeka Catherine A — 12396 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 • 1087 09118 0000 Sheikh Awais A 12390 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09119 0000 Mang Wen 12380 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09120 OD00 McCloskey 12370 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09121 0000 Vada arty Anil 12360 Macon Or Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09122 0000 Afiaga Jeremy J 12350 Macon Or Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09123 0000 Zhan Zhong C 450 N Mountain Ave#A Upland CA 91786 1087 09124 ODDO Jiang Zhenihi 12336 Macon Dr Rancho Cucari origa' CA 91739 1087 09125 OODO Webb Kevin D 12330 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09126 0000 Thigpen Douglas W 12320 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09127 0000 5arwar Sahel M 12310 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09128 0000 Lee Thomas Y 12265 Melbourne Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09129 ODDO Enriquez Richard&Carolyn 1 12275 Melbourne Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09130 0000 Sozich Miro S 5&16&03 12285 Melbourne Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09131 DODO Wen Eva H 12295 Melbourne Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087-69132 0000 Llu Ba611 12301 Melbourne Dr Ranchd Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09133 0000 Robles Maximo L 12311 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09134 0000 Chu Alan W 12321 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09135 0000 Dalai Neville U _ 12331 Macon Or_ Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09136 0000 Chu Frank W&Iris L — 12341 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09137 0000 Fong Thomas H 12351 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09138 0000 Faciane Kris D 12361 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09139 0000 ChaudhryTagl_ 12371 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09140 0000 Tochinda Charerntas 12381 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 091 41 0000 Cobb Dalton 0 12391 Maoon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 091 42 0000 Querl Patrick 12450 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09143 0000 Schmidt David&Selene 5091 Kent Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09144 D000 Mitchell Melva Y 5081 Kent Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09145 OD00 Wimp Rik 503 Vendola or San Rafael CA 94903 1087 09246 0000 Brown Damian M 5060 Kent Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 • Item C-86 1087 10145 0000 Nguyen Nicholas 5092 Sepia Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10146 0000 Sloan Susan Mary 5098 Sepia Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10147 0000 Oelschiaeger Ladonna M 5102 Sepia Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10148 0000 Kuk Ming Chau 5308 Se is Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10149 0000 Morris Scott&Kristin 5118 Sepia Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 108710150 DODD Dickinson Joann&Charlie 12303 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10151 0000 Yucelen Matt Y 12313 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 108710152 OOOD Klm Joon H&Dolly 12323 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10153 0000 Chang Te-Hsien 10850 Church St#F207 Rancho Cucamonga CA. 91730 1087 10154 0000 Liu Joseph F 12343 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 101 55 0000 Cheng Chen&Lingyan 348 W Camino Real Ave — Arcadia CA —_ 91007 1087 10156 0000 Rancho Properties LLC 800 S Hvn#300 Ontario CA 91764 1087102 01 D000 Sozinski Kathy 5040 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 102 02 0000 Amajoyi Barbara C 5050 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087102 03 DODD Qatim!Haitham 5060 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 102 04 0000 Dethloff Dana 5070 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087102 05 DODO Armstrong Emilia 5080 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 102 06 0000 Hsieh John Tung 5090 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087102 07 ODDO Carlson Nathan&Christine K 12361 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 102 08 0000 Wong Chun Fung Teran 12367 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 111 01 0000 Shangguan Xue 5165 Seagreen Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 111 02 0000.Chen Dong 5175 Seagreen Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 f 108711103 DODD Liang Joshua 5186 Seagreen Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 111 28 0000 Griffin James 5172 Crimson PI Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 111 29 0000 Mesa Nathan 12211 Maroon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 11130 0000 Monsale Jonahlie Quintos 12207 Maroon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 111 31 0000 Kiehl David A 12197 Maroon Or Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 108711132 OD00 Li Xin 12187 Maroon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 11133 0000 Penergraft Stephen 12177 Maroon Dr Rancho Cucemon a CA 91739 1087 11142 0000 McClendon William 12262 Scarlet Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 11144 0000 Rancho Properties LLC 800 S Hvn#300 Ontario CA 91764 1087 11145 0000 Metri Usama 5166 Seagreen Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 11147 0000 Chen Yu 5176 Seagreen Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 12119 0000 Filmalter Barbara Lilian 5125 Maywood Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 12124 0000 Burden Jerry Lee 5082 L nWODd Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 12125 0000' Abbruzzese Robert E 5092 Lynwood Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 12126 0000 Gandara Edward _ 5096 Lynwood Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 121 27 0000 Garcia Stephan Ramon` 5099 Lynwood Cf Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 108712128 OD00 Zhao Rou 5097 Lynwood Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 12129 0000 Sun Ping 5093 Lynwood Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 12130 0000 He Aan 5087 Lynwood Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 24249 0000 Mickelsen Mark A 12578 Del Rey Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 341 50 0000 Huang Jiamin 12568 Del Rey Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 141 51 000D Zhang Ting 12558 Del Rey Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 351 11 0000 Solis Jesus 12650 Encino Ct— _ _ Rancho Cucamonga CA _ _ 91739 1087 351 12 0006 Tan Therese M T 12640 Encino Ct Rancho Cucamon CA 91739 1087 35113 ODOO Gales Carl 12630 Encino Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 35114 0000 Qas as Shad!A 12620 Encino Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 351 15 0000 Budge David C&Heidi A_ 12610 Encino Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 35116 0000 Leung Yuen May 12575 Encino Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 35127 0000 Alcantara Ernest 12585 Encino Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 35128 0000 Yao Chong 12595 Encino Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 35119 0000 Camolina Jose A 12615 Encino Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 35120 0000 Boles Arik Wayne 12625 Encino Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 351 21 0000 Kamal Mohammed G 12635 Encino Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 351 32 0000 Liu An 9546 E Naomi Ave Arcadia CA 91007 1087 35133 OODO Perdue 5&29&07 12602 Naples Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 351 34 0000 Curran Micheal 12582 Naples Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 351 35 0000 Mang Li 12572 Naples Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 35136 OD00 Wu Shu Chih Yen 12562 Naples Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 Item.0-87 1087 35137 0000 Rose 8&24&10 12552 Naples Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 35138 0000 Jang Frances W 110 N Lincoln Ave#100 Corona CA 92882 1087 35139 D000 Lee Jung In 12557 Naples Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 35140 0000 Romero Javier A 12567 Naples Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 351 41 0000 Atienza Bernadette G 12577 Naples Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 35142 OODO Baek William 5 12587 Naples Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 35145 0000 Bowie Randy J&Nevea V 12548 Del Rey Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 35145 0000 Krall Matthew M 5072 Lynwood Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 35147 0000 Chuang Chin Y 920 E Colorado Blvd#305 Pasadena CA 91106 1087 361 31 0000 City Of Rancho Cucamonga Po Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91729 i 1087 36132 0000 Rancho Etiwanda Estate Maint Corp 38625 Calistoga Dr#200 Murrieta CA 92563 i .s I T (g� • II C[� f l Item C-88 PARCEL OCCUPANTS SITEADDRESS SITECITY SITESTATE SITEZIP 1087 07114 0000 Occupant 5115 Orange Dr San Bernardino CA 92407 1087 081 01 0000 Occupant 4926 Etiwanda Ave Etiwanda CA 91739 1087 09108 0000 Occupant 12441 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09123 0000 Occupant 12340 Macon Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09145 0000 Occupant - 5071 Kent Ct Rancho Cucamonga - CA- -__ 91739 1087 091 510000 Occupant 5091 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09152 0000 Occupant 5081 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09153 0000 Occupant 5071 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09154 0000 Occupant 5061 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 09155 0000 Occupant 5051 Juneau Ct Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10115 0000 Occupant 12176 Bisque Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 f 1087 10124 0000 Occupant 12185 Bisque Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10153 0000 Occupant 12333 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 10155 0000 Occupant 12353 Helena Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 35132 0000 Occupant 12622 Naples Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 1087 351 38 0000 Occupant 12547 Naples Way Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 Item C-89 Phoenix Crest � benr,-- hmark Neighborhood Meeting COM M UNITIES Sign-in Sheet 77 r o,i _036 rq 9 D -S 3 12Jy�JD C-R, 90 Hl3YV,I Y'I ` n - .R.w ez Ff of tic, g1901 ll 7_76 a �-�e 0i 3 8 (i I i I ti I i i S f f f 1 i i Item C-90 RESOLUTION NO. 15-02 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00620, A REQUEST FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 95 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES LOCATED WITHIN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL (L) DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN ADJACENT TO INDIAN WELLS PLACE,APPROXIMATELY 1,800 FEET NORTH OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1087-071-15. A. Recitals. 1. Benchmark Communities filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2014-00620, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." . 2. On the 28th day of January 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on January 28, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application involves a request for the architectural and site plan review for the construction of 95 single-family homes located within the Low-Residential (L) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan adjacent to Indian Wells Place, approximately 1,800 feet north of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 1087-071-15; and b. On July 24, 2002, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226, which permitted the subdivision of 265 residential lots on 92.78 acres of land located north of the intersection of Day Creek Boulevard and Indian Wells Place. The project site is part of a 632-unit Master Planned Community known as Rancho Etiwanda Estates. The site has since been divided into multiple phases, all of which have been approved for development except for the subject 95-lots that are located within the remaining 37.43 acres at the northwest corner of Rancho Etiwanda Estates. The project site was previously rough-graded, and the perimeter block walls as well as homeowner association maintained walls, fences, and landscaping have been installed along Indian Wells Place; and C. The subject property is located within the "Upper Etiwanda" neighborhood of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP). Particular"primary" architectural styles, such as Bungalow, Item C-91 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 15-02 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00620—BENCHMARK COMMUNITIES January 28, 2014 Page 2 Ranch, Monterey, and San Juan are required to be used on at least two-thirds of the proposed units. The applicant has chosen to use only primary architectural styles and will, therefore, be in compliance with this requirement. The San Juan elevation incorporates wrought iron details, shed roof awning with decorative wood braces and exposed rafter tales.The Country style incorporates decorative gables, louvered shutters, and stucco window trim. The Bungalow style incorporates stone wainscot and porch column bases with dual post columns, decorative beams and brackets at gables and wood shingle siding. The Monterey style incorporates decorative shutters, wood balcony, beams, and railing as well as exposed rafter tails. All homes will also incorporate decorative garage doors; and d. The ENSP also requires residential projects of this size to incorporate a minimum of eight(8) housing footprints with a minimum of four(4)elevations per footprint.The ENSP allows for reverse footprints to count as an additional footprint. The ENSP also allows for plans with courtyard walls and patios along the front elevation to count as an additional elevation. The proposed development will be in compliance with these minimum requirements; and e. The floor plans range in size from a 2,689 square foot plan to a 4,055 square foot plan. One (1) of the four (4) floor plans will be single-story, while the other three (3) are two-story. The plans submitted indicate that twenty-five (25) percent of the lots will contain single-story homes, which is a requirement specified in the ENSP; and f. A Development Agreement was approved in 2001 that requires compliance with the Low Residential District standards for all lots within this tract (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226). Development standards forthe Low Residential District include, but are not limited to, maximum lot coverage of forty (40) percent, maximum height of thirty-five (35) feet, minimum front yard setback of eighteen (18) feet with an average front yard setback of twenty (20) feet (measured from the right-of-way), a fifteen (15) foot minimum building separation on side yards with a five (5) and ten (10) foot side yard setback measured from the property lines. The project complies with these requirements; and g. The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger) reviewed the elevations on December 16, 2014, and recommended approval to the Planning Commission. The Technical Review Committee also reviewed the project on December 16, 2014, and recommended approval to the Planning Commission; and h. A neighborhood meeting for Design Review DRC2014-00620 was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the site. The meeting was held in the Creative Corner room at Central Park, located at 11200 Base Line Road on Monday, December 1, 2014. There were a total of seven people in attendance. No major issues or concerns were raised at the meeting; and i. This project was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: Item C-92 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-02 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00620— BENCHMARK COMMUNITIES January 28, 2014 Page 3 a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The proposal is to construct a single-family residence on each lot of a 95-lot subdivision (Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226-2) for a total of 95 single-family residences. The underlying General Plan designation is Low Residential, which allows for single-family residential development; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project is located within the Low-Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, which allows for single-family residential development; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project is in compliance with all applicable development standards, including setbacks, lot coverage and building height. Furthermore, the project incorporates architecture that is consistent with the requirements specified within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. On July 24, 2002, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226, which permitted the subdivision of 265 residential lots for single-family dwelling units on 92.78 acres of land located north of the intersection of Day Creek Boulevard and Indian Wells Place. The subject Design Review for single-family dwelling units is consistent with this previous approval, which was determined not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified an Environmental Impact Report in June 1991 for the University/Crest Planned Development, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in October 1999 which approved the creation of two stand-alone developments, and an Initial Study Addendum was certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in connection with the approval of Tentative Tract Map 16226. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Design Review DRC2014-00620, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the Item C-93 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-02 DESIGN REVIEW DRC201.4-00620— BENCHMARK COMMUNITIES January 28, 2014 Page 4 project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previously certified EIR. The proposed development does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report for the tract map. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant,-due to the fact that the proposed development does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report for the tract map. C. Prior to any action being taken for the requested Design Review approval and based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with staffs determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Design Review DRC2014-00620. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2015, by the following vote-to-wit- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item C-94 Conditions of Approval F i RANCI30', op_ GA Community Development Department roject#: DRC2014-00620 PMT2014-03974, PMT2014-04568 Project Name: Benchmark Communities Design Review Rancho Etiwanda Estates Location: - 108707115-0000 Project Type: Design Review Fire Protection Plan, Residential Miscellaneous ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 1. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street. 2. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 3. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 4. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD)Standards. 5. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 6. The site shall be developed .and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, and all applicable Development Agreements.. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. On comer side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 54bot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 9. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. *rinted:111312015 www.CityofRC.us Item C-95 Project#: DRC2014-00620 PMT2014-03974, PMT2014-04568 Project Name: Benchmark Communities Design Review Rancho Etiwanda Estates Location: - 108707115-0000 Project Type: Design Review Fire Protection Plan., Residential Miscellaneous ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 10. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 11. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.). 12.. Project perimeter walls and fences shall be constructed in accordance with the submitted plans. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall.. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 13. For residential development, return walls shall be decorative masonry. Corner side walls and fences shall be consistent with the approved wall and fence plan. 14. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron, per the approved fence and wall plan, to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 16. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 17. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. with Conditions shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requited to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed, Engineer/Architect. 18. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 19. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 9 Printed:1/13/2015 Item C-96 Project#: DRC2014-00620 PMT2014-03974, PMT2014-04568 Project Name: Benchmark Communities Design Review Rancho Etiwanda Estates Location: - 108707115-0000 ,Project Type: Design Review Fire Protection Plan, Residential Miscellaneous ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 20. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required. This requirement shall be.in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 21. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 22. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering.Services Department. 23. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less, than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. *14, All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than- 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater ope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 25. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department 26. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. The final location of the mailboxes shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. B. Engineering Services Department 1. The final tract maChhas to be approved and recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 2. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 02-77 approving Tentative Parcel Map 16226 will continue to apply. • www.CityofRC.us Printed:'1/13!2015 Page 3 of 9 Item C-97 Project#: DRC2014-00620 PMT2014-03974, PMT2014-04568 Project Name: Benchmark Communities Design Review Rancho Etiwanda Estates Location: - 108707115-0000 Project Type: Design Review Fire Protection Plan, Residential Miscellaneous ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Enciineering Services Department 3. Since Tract 16226-2 is within the High Fire Hazard Area, some of the street tree species and spacings that were approved last 2008 have been discontinued and revised last January 2010. a. Revision to City Drawing Number 2021 shall be required to reflect revised street tree species and spacing, any relocation of drive approaches and addition of curb cores, if applicable. b. Plan check/processing fee will be determined at the time of plan check submittal. . 4. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, 'and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 5. Pay a Traffic Circulation Fee of $2,635.00 per .lot, as required by Reimbursement Agreement SRA-.41,prior to each building permit issuance. 6. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all. improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the. City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. C. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit 1. The conceptaual landscape plans and the the landscape plans must comply with all the provision of the approved FPP regarding vegetation species, clearance, spacing, grouping and sizes. 2. FCS-3 Fire Access Roadways: Public and private roads shall be improved as approved by the fire district in the Fire Protection plan before an occupancy release can be granted by the Fire District. 3. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. 4. Public water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building Permits for the homes will not be issued until the public fire service plans are approved by RCFPD and CVWD. www.CityafRC.us Printed:1113/2015 Page 4 of 9 Item C-98 Project#: DRC2014-00620 PMT2014-03974, PMT2014-04568 Project Name: Benchmark Communities Design Review Rancho Etiwanda Estates Location: - 108707115-0000 .Project Type: Design Review Fire Protection Plan, Residential Miscellaneous ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. C. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit 5. The required fire flow for this project is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with approved FPP and the CA Fire Code Appendix B, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 6. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. 7. The architectural plans for the construction of the buildings must be in accordance with the current editions of the CBC Chapter 7A, The California Residential Code, the RCFPD Ordinance, the applicable standards and policies, and the approved Fire Protection Plan (FPP). 8. The applicant shall obtain approval of the submitted Fire Protection Plan (FPP). The proposed mitigation for all lots having reduced defensible space must be approved by the RC Fire Marshal. The disposition of the Fire Marshal's Mitigation must be implemented into the FPP before building permit issuance. 9. Mobile, stationary or portable power-operated equipment in the Hazardous Fire Area shall not be used without the Fire Safety Division's written approval. Specific fire protection measures that may be required to mitigate the hazard include, but are not limited to: a. A stand-by water tender, equipped with a pump,fire hose and nozzle. 0b. Pre-wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks between blades or tracks and rocks. . Conducting a fire watch for a minimum of one-hour following the cessation of operations each day. d. For welding, cutting or grinding work, clear away. all combustible material from the area around such operation for a minimum distance of 10-feet. A "hot-work" permit must be obtained from Fire Construction Services prior to cutting,welding or grinding work. e. Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty six (46) inches and one five (5) gallon backpack water pump-type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready for use at the immediate area during the operation. 10. FCS-8 Fire Sprinklers: The Current editions of Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance, the California Residential Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in all Buildings with R and U occupancy fire areas. All structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D and the approved FPP regarding additional areas of coverage and number of heads to be be calculated.. D. Building and Safety Services Department 1. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal. sprinted:1/13/2015 ` Ww.QtyofRC.us Page 5 of 9 Item C-99 Project#: DRC2014-00620 PMT2014-03974, PMT2014-04568 Project Name: Benchmark Communities Design Review Rancho Etiwanda Estates Location: - 108707115-0000 Project Type: Design Review Fire Protection Plan, Residential Miscellaneous ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. D. Building and Safety Services Department 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance-conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics,. underground -diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location,fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. NOTE: The construction and landscaping of this tract must be in accordance with the approved Fire Protection Plan and the current edition of the California Building; this tract is located in the VHFHSZ. 6. The structures in this tract must be equipped with automatic fire sprinkler in accordance with the approved Fire protection Plan and The California Residential Code. Some structures will require attic and eave sprinkler heads. 7. Construction of the. home must be in accordance with the approved special construction features of the Fire Protection Plan including Chapter 7A of the CBC and section 327 of the CRC; this tract is located in the VHFHSZ. 8. Provide compliance with the .Califomia Residential/Code Building Code (CBC/CRC) for property line clearances considering use, occupancy and fire-resistive construction of the structure. 9. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 10. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind"instructions. 11.. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 12. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 13. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, construction is not permitted on Sunday or holidays. Printed=1/13/2015 www.c4umc.us Page 6 of 9 Item C-100 Project#: DRC2014-00620 PMT2014-03974, PMT2014-04568 Project Name: Benchmark Communities Design Review Rancho Etiwanda Estates Location: - 108707115-0000 ,Project Type: Design Review Fire Protection Plan, Residential Miscellaneous ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. D. Building and Safety Services Department 14. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. E. Grading Section 1. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 2. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 3. In the equestrian trails: — Provide PVC fence, 4" thick DG surface, parallel drainage V ditch, bridge over V ditch where necessary for access corals, gates to corrals, S< 5% cross fall 2%, S>5% cross fall 4%. Water bars required at the spacing for the slopes shown respectively: 50' for 4% to 6%, 40' for 6% to 9%, 30' for 9% to 12%, 20' for 12%+. In the equestrian trails water bars shall also be placed at the top and bottom where the gradient of the trail changes, i.e. a steep downhill slope which will OMuse additional erosion to the trail. 4. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 5. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 6. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 7. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted,. and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 9. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 0 Printed:1/1312015 www.CitycfRC.us Page 7 of 9 Item C-101 Project#: DRC2014-00620 PMT2014-03974, PMT2014-04568 Project Name: Benchmark Communities Design Review Rancho Etiwanda Estates Location: - 108707115-0000 Project Type: Design Review Fire Protection Plan, Residential Miscellaneous ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- E. ROJECT.E. Grading Section 11. A drainage study. showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 12. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant. to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 13. It shall be .the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing. the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 14. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 15. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 16. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 17. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 18. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading .contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed. by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 19. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan .(WQMP) best management practices (BMP)devices. www.QtyofRC.us Printed:1113/2015 Page 8 of 9 Item C-102 Project#: DRC2014-00620 PMT2014-03974, PMT2014-04568 Project Name: Benchmark Communities Design Review Rancho Etiwanda Estates Location: - 108707115-0000 •Project Type: Design Review Fire Protection Plan, Residential Miscellaneous ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 20. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CCBR's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 21. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 22. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality' Management Plan"shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 0Printed:1/13/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 9 Item C-103 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: January 28, 2015RANCHO C;UCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 -TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC -A request to subdivide one existing 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels within the Equestrian Overlay of the Very Low (VL) Residential Zoning District located at the northeast corner of Sapphire.Street and Brittany Lane at 5615 Sapphire Street-APN: 1061-691-04. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. BACKGROUND: On November 4, 2014, following the preparation of the Staff Report for this project, staff received a petition letter signed by three residents that live adjacent to the subject property that raised concerns involving site design and drainage. On November 12, 2014, prior to the Planning Commission meeting, staff received an updated petition that included a total of thirty-eight signatures from adjacent residents (Exhibit F). In addition to the residents' concerns, there was an outstanding technical issue that needed to be addressed that involved the required• depth of Lot 3. Therefore,based on the resident's concerns and technical issue, staff recommended this project be continued at the November 12, 2014, Planning Commission meeting to allow the applicant more time to work with staff to resolve the issues. The Planning Commission continued SUBTT18961 to a date unspecified. ANALYSIS: On November 19, 2014, staff from the Planning, Building and Safety and Engineering Departments met with the applicant to address the above-mentioned concerns. The following is a list of issues discussed and the revisions that were made to address the concerns. ISSUES " ' '• " RESPONSES 1. On November 12, 2014, during This concern was expressed during the first neighborhood the Planning Commission meeting on August 20, 2014. Following the initial hearing, multiple residents neighborhood meeting, Planning, Engineering and Building spoke and expressed concern and Safety Department staff met to discuss the drainage regarding future drainage of the concerns. The Engineering Services Department created a subject property. Their condition requiring the applicant to provide calculations and concerns mainly involved how install appropriate additional drainage inlet facilities as the drainage would affect determined by the City Engineer at the south end of Brittany existing residential properties Lane. This condition was created to address any potential located downslope of the site, drainage impacts. The project applicant is in agreement with including the cul-de-sac this condition. (Brittany Lane) located to the south. Additionally, on December 3, 2014, the applicant submitted a revised map that was redesigned to reduce the amount of • Item D-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOI KE, LLC January 28, 2015 Page drainage diverted into Brittany Lane. This was achieved by redesigning the pad elevations of Lots 5, 6, and 7 so that these lots will no longer drain entirely into the right-of-way, but will drain partially into the right-of-way as well as partially into the v-ditch adjacent to the equestrian trail located at the rear of these lots. Per Exhibit D (as submitted by the applicant), the proposed drainage being diverted into the v-ditch located at the rear of Lots 5, 6, and 7 is less than the existing drainage that is currently being diverted to the southeast comer of the subject property. Therefore, staff finds the redesign to be acceptable. 2. A second concern expressed The revised map also addresses these concerns. Multiple by the neighboring residents at lots, including Lots 3 and 7, were designed to have lower pad the November 12, 2014, elevations than the previous design of the map, thereby, Planning Commission hearing integrating the design of the future lots more seamlessly into involved what the surrounding the adjacent community. By doing this,the applicant was also property owners consider a lack able to redistribute the location of slopes throughout the tract. of consistency with the existing For example, Lot 3 was previously designed with slopes surrounding residential along the entire street frontage of this parcel along the south development. This includes the and east property lines. By lowering the conceptual pad conceptual pad elevations elevation on this lot, the applicant was able to drastically relative to the street grade of reduce the slopes along the front and most of the comer side the lots and the slopes adjacent yard, which helps to achieve more compatibility with the to the right-of-way. design of the adjacent neighborhood. Lastly, by redistributing the slopes,the applicant was able to create a better driveway design with less of a slope. As shown on Exhibit C (Page 2), the applicant has designed the conceptual grading of the site taking into consideration the location and slope of future driveways. 3. Lot 3 contained a depth of 187.5 The applicant reconfigured the map to lengthen the depth of feet, which was not in Lot 3 to 200 feet. All lots are now in compliance with the conformance with the required lot development standards as indicated in the depth development standard of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. 200 feet for lots with in the Very Low Residential (VL) District specified in the Development Code. CONCLUSION: For a detailed analysis of the proposed subdivision, history of the neighborhood meetings and Committee reviews, please see the attached Staff Report dated November 12, 2014, (Exhibit A). Based on the information listed above, staff ultimately finds the revised Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961 to be an overall better design, as well as to be in compliance with the required City,standards. Item D-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOI KE, LLC January 28, 2015 Page . Respectfully submitted, Candyce Bu eft Planning Director CB:DP/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 12, 2014, with attached exhibits Exhibit B - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit C - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit D - Hydrology Map Exhibit E - Pad Elevation Map Exhibit F - Petition Letter Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961 with Conditions of Approval Item D-3 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT • DATE: November 12, 2014ANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C;UCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 -TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC -A request to subdivide one existing 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels within the Equestrian Overlay of the Very Low (VL) Residential Zoning District located at the northeast corner of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane at 5615 Sapphire Street- APN: 1061-691-04. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTTM18961 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 1.67 dwelling units/acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences - Equestrian Overlay of the Very Low (VL) Residential • Zoning District South - Single-Family Residences - Equestrian Overlay of the Very Low (VL) Residential Zoning District East - Floyd M. Stork Elementary School - Equestrian Overlay of the Very Low (VL) Residential Zoning District West - Single-Family Residences - Equestrian Overlay of the Very Low (VL) Residential Zoning District C. General Plan Designations: Project Site- Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - Very Low Residential East - Schools - West - Very Low Residential D. Site Characteristics: The 4.75-acre site, located at the northeast comer of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane, is rectangular in shape with approximately 320 feet of street frontage adjacent to Sapphire Street and a depth of 665 feet. The site's street frontage along Sapphire Street is partially improved with a north and southbound driving lane and currently does not include curb, gutter, parkway or sidewalk improvements. This property has an existing single-family residence located in the northwest quadrant of the parcel. The land generally slopes from north to south and contains multiple trees that surround the residence as well as light ground vegetation throughout the remainder of the property. The site is surrounded to the north, south and west by existing single-family residences, and is surrounded to the east by Floyd M. Stork *EXHIBIT Elementary School.A Item D-4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOI KE, LLC November 12, 2014 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The project involves the subdivision of a 4.75-acre parcel into 7 lots for.future residential development. Two of the lots are proposed to have frontage adjacent to Sapphire Street, and the other five lots will be adjacent to the proposed cul-de-sac. The site is located within the Equestrian Overlay of the Very-Low (VL) Residential Zoning District, which requires subdivisions to have a maximum of 2 dwelling units per acre, an average lot size of 22,500 square feet and a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet. This project involves the creation of lots ranging in size from 21,780 to 40,000 square feet with an average lot size of 26,270 square feet. The project density is 1.67 dwelling units. per acre. Per Section 17.36 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (RCDC), the VL Residential District also requires all lots to have a minimum depth of 200 feet, corner lots to have a minimum width of 100 feet and interior lots to have a minimum width of 90 feet. This project complies with these requirements. Per RCDC Section 17.70.040, all residential development located in the City's Equestrian Overlay is required to include an equestrian trail system. Since this tract is located within the Equestrian Overlay, it incorporates a 15-foot wide trail that is adjacent to all proposed lots along the north and east edge of the project area,which is required to be maintained by each property owner within the tract. The trail will have a vehicular access point at the northwest corner of the parcel, adjacent to Sapphire Street, and will connect to an existing trail located adjacent to the southeast comer of the parcel. In addition to the equestrian easement, a 4-foot wide drainage easement is provided in order to properly divert trail-adjacent drainage flows. The site was designed to follow the existing topography of the property.The conceptual grading plan indicates the perimeter of some of the lots will contain various slopes. Retaining walls are not proposed at this time, but may be necessary in the future depending on the size and placement of the homes as well as the front and rear yard designs. Lots 5 thru 7 contain various size slopes adjacent to the drainage facilities along the rear portion of these lots. Additional grading may be necessary to allow for adequate access to be provided between these lots and the equestrian trail and will be reviewed during the design review process which is required prior to residential development on these lots. Development of the site will require street improvements along Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane as well as the creation of a new cul-de-sac (Brittany Court), which will run off of Brittany Lane and have a length of approximately 200 feet. Per the Engineering Department's review of the submitted plans, Sapphire Street.(Collector Street).as_well. as Brittany..Lane and.Brittany Court (Local Streets) meet the City's street standards. Lastly, since the site does contain several trees throughout primarily the northwest portion of the parcel, staff is including a condition that will require a Tree Removal Permit to be approved for the removal of any heritage tree,which the Development Code defines as any tree in excess of thirty feet (30') in height and having a single trunk diameter of twenty inches (20"), prior to the issuance of a grading permit. B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961 was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the site. The meeting was held in the multipurpose room at Floyd M. Stork Elementary School, located east of the proposed subdivision at 5646 Jasper Street on Wednesday, August 20, 2014. The following is a list of questions that were raised by the attending residents regarding the proposed project: Item D-5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC November 12, 2014 Page 3 QUESTIONS RESPONSES 1. Several years ago we experienced The applicant's engineer, Rob Otte, stated that their drainage problems where there is objective is to not negatively impact any surrounding an existing catch-basin in the properties. He also stated that this concern would be Brittany Lane cul-de-sac, which brought up with the Planning and Engineering caused flooding around the Departments to ensure that there would be no drainage improvements and within drainage issues. the front yard area.Will the drainage produced by this project affect the properties located within the cul-de- sac to the south? 2. We are concerned that the'homes The applicant's representative, Mrs. Raszewski will not be consistent with our explained that the project only involves subdividing one neighborhood. How large are the parcel into seven parcels and does not involve a houses that are proposed and what request to construct houses. She also mentioned that do they look like? the City has specific design requirements, including a standard that requires 25 percent of all proposed single-family detached units to be single-story units,for future proposed residential development. 3. We do not want the project to The project planner explained that the property in eliminate the view that we currently question is located within the Very Low Residential have, because we believe this may District, which allows for half-acre lot single-family reduce the value of our homes. Will residential development with a maximum height of 35 • future homes obstruct my view? feet. Staff also explained that the City currently does not have an ordinance in place to restrict/regulate development,from obstructing existing views. 4. The homeowner located south of Mrs. Raszewski explained that they currently do not and adjacent to Lot 7 inquired about have plans to install fencing on the site, but stated future fencing that may be should her company move forward to propose future constructed along her northern development they will meet the City's fencing property line. requirements and will work with any neighbors to address their concerns. 5. Can the pad elevations for each lot Mrs. Raszewski explained that the applicant's civil be lowered? engineering has only provided the conceptual grading elevations for each lot, which may slightly change --- when the size of the future houses are determined. She stated that the proposed grading will not be a departure from the sites existing topography of the site. She also indicated that the proposed lot elevations are designed to maintain acceptable drainage flows. A second neighborhood meeting was held on Tuesday, October 21, 2014 at Floyd M. Stork Elementary School. The intent of this meeting was to follow up with the surrounding residents and explain the progress that had occurred since the first neighborhood meeting. The applicant explained to all attending residents that the City's Technical, Trails Advisory and Design Review Committees reviewed this project and are recommending that the project be brought to the Planning Commission for review. The applicant noted that the project's civil engineer, Rob Otte, • had worked with the City's Engineering Department to resolve concerns regarding drainage impacts to the residential tract south of the subject property. Per the Engineering Department, Item D-6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC November 12, 2014 Page 4 a condition has been added to the attached conditions of approval requiring the applicant to provide calculations and install appropriate additional drainage inlet facilities as determined by the City Engineer at the south end of Brittany Lane. In addition to the neighborhood meetings, residents, sharing both support and opposition, contacted staff by phone. Most inquiries were directed towards the size and design of homes that could be built on the proposed lots. Staff responded that the site is located within the Very Low Residential District that allows for half-acre lot, single-family residential development. This District requires specific development standards that all lots must comply with, such as a maximum height allowance of 35 feet, maximum lot coverage allowance of 25 percent, and setbacks specified in Section 17.36 of the Development Code. Staff also explained that the City's Development Code requires proposed residential development to go through a review process, similar to the process that this project is currently going through, so that the City can review the architectural styles as well as building placements. There was one resident that stated they were in the process of assembling a petition to oppose this project ultimately stating that he felt this subdivision would not be consistent with the existing surrounding development. He also feared the future development of this site would lower the property value of his home, located just south of the proposed subdivision, and eliminate his current view of the mountains. Staff explained that the property in review is within a zoning district that allowed for half-acre lot residential development and is also consistent with the General Plan land use designation for this area.As of the preparation of this report, the Planning Department has not yet received any written statements in support or opposition of this project. C. Technical and Desiqn Review Committee: The Technical and Design Review Committees reviewed the project on September 2, 2014. No issues were raised and the Committees recommended approval of the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission. D. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee (TRC) reviewed the project on October 8, 2014.The following is a list of questions asked by the TRC and responses discussed. during this meeting: QUESTIONS RESPONSES 1. Does Lot 2 have sufficient The applicant's engineer, Rob Otte, agreed with the access to the equestrian trail Committee's concern and proposes to revise the map along the rear of the lot? to allow for adequate trail access for Lot 2(The attached tract map._indicates.that the map was.revised to provide Lot 2 with adequate trail access along the rear lot line). 2. Is the V-ditch drainage along Mr. Otte explained that the trail adjacent V-ditch has the trail adequate to serve adequate slope and connection. He also explained that this tract? the V-ditch was recently revised, per staff's direction, from having a depth of 12 inches and a width of 2.5 feet to having a depth of 6 inches and a width of 4 feet. This was adjusted to create a safer trail experience. 3. When will the trail adjacent Staff explained that upon future residential development block walls be installed? of the site, block walls will be reviewed by staff as well as the Design Review Committee prior to being installed 4. Will a sidewalk be built along Mr. Otte explained that the project will incorporate Sapphire Street? improvements along Sapphire Street that will include the installation of a sidewalk. Item D-7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC November 12, 2014 Page 5 5. Will double gates be installed Staff explained that double gates will be a condition at the rear of each lot? placed on any future residential development of the site. 6. How will vehicular access be Staff explained that the applicant's engineer had provided at Sapphire Street recently provided staff with a graphic showing their plan for the trail? to provide a drive approach, gate and posts at the intersection of Sapphire Street for access to the trail. Following the discussion, staff presented a list of conditions that would mitigate the concerns of the committee, which are included in the conditions of approval attached to this report. The Committee recommended approval of the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission. E. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) because the project meets all of the requirements stated in the CEQA Guidelines. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan and zoning designation and regulations, which allows for a density of two dwelling units per acre. The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. Based on field visits and a Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis (RECA) prepared by MIG on May 1, 2014 (Exhibit H), the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. Staff has also determined that approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Furthermore, the site can be adequately • served by all required utilities and public services. With implementation of the standard conditions and all applicable regulatory requirements, such as the Migratory Bird Act, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectf ly submitted, Candy urhett Planning Director CB:DP/Is Attachments: Exhibit A—Aerial Map Exhibit B —Site Utilization Map Exhibit C —Tentative Tract Map Exhibit D—Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit E — Design Review Committee comments Exhibit F—Trails Advisory Committee comments Exhibit G— Neighborhood Meeting notification and reports Exhibit H — Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis ® Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961 with Conditions of Approval Item D-8 '� •�� -. * ky , � • �'', a A' i ;'��'� `� f''� c w' r ; iia f• 4,�i .., }A t- -= i Nj SITE A-31 L4 ; r C`� �-'''°•-�-w p� -'`r' �-�` -i ,mac {/�-�� ° f •I s c"9 }r l t Fa " "C a m a a• f—+ u a •-t9 5�-., sl I 4$ > z NZ_- V + � r f � I • '_� A .. k {? In a J'� 3�1, RbV -'_ �-; h'.r� s'�a% �'xE4.j�F� A 9 ?�&" .+�, �+, r � ,.V `. � e ''n Tt• A '`�^('�=,��5 a� '��s- �"'�. ® � '"AI', r 5 � �' FT. »:br-it ij Yui' SSL.'. � sid8 B n et6 � :z .. � �`' `� ''�$''e c ��F .Y �!i... w �:ayg' Y-j, 'ro 3 Y�r ��ujsc�W�4 s lro�°�.r°r'�•N^9y'gp: �w;,9 Ow 5?5 µ Y h x • .r Fb `�i 1� �9r 15 e� -•-••f;r..e g� ca ,x�c€f 'tar". ONZ hl ei 1 � "?� ta'!`➢ \li � a. , r sixgaS�' a'is et�ibn. Z 5 < } 4•* �' � ;. e� .r �I -tiMeM1Vk4 Ji e�asi het g�k rY j S tix e • - L :_.(� y.f' 3'Ir Fri°Ft}' r � r d sN✓. � �'�': iry 44. u'�°"'.�� n �t ., i v may.- mu..ar rsoYpr mx >�;.;a x+ . rill. TENTATIVE MAP No. 18961 UTILITY PURVEYORS WATER I CUCAMONOA VALLEY WATERDI NIACT 101W AtITORO S1REEr RARd10 WCWONOA.dSIFORNIA 017004109 (SW)08748M PRWECT LOCAT SEWER C1A'AAWIGAVALIEYWATERD18TRICT eNNlt aTAtIT 10"O A811FORD STREET - RANCHOCUCAMONGkCALIFORNIA 9174 2709 J W SOUTHERN iFl ELECTRIC MIRED DODAVENU EDsoN caA1PAHY 7051 REDWOODAVEHue bV 7 FONTANA CALIFORNIA 223311r RW (9W)W4HO8 w a ' ta' nicer OAS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY or It• a 1901 WEST LUOONIAAVENUE u r of W of r es REWINDS.CAIFORNIA 82910 mtttNawwcNeamttNut _ rymisae7aox N TELEPHONE VEROON COMMUNICATIONS No�AKtawlamtl 140D E.PHILIPS SOW.EVARD6 BUILDING to POMONA.CALIFORNIA 81788 (g1N)emme TYPICAL SECTION SAPPHIRE STREET TRASH SUNRTEO WASTE OmUBTNES NOTTOSCALE BSNCNERRYAVENUE FOWANAaAUFORKA SM LEGAL DESCRIPTION (800)0B74T17 THE NORRANEBT p11RIER aF Lor 2,atDc1L la of cUCAMONOAHOMEeTEAD ASSOCIATION IANDe,M THE CIIYOF RANWIO CIICAMONSA COUMY OF SfZ1001B IFI ALTAlDYA 8CG1001O19TT8C7 SAN fSERHAgDINO.STATE OF CAIIFORN81L A9 PEA AUIP RECORDED 9900EA8WW ROAD M ROOK&PAGE b OF MAPA M THEOFFICEOF TECOVNIV RECOROEItOF ALL7AUDMA.CALWORIM 9IM-MI MT.NO 10C..1— v Ntlr BAIDCOIAITY. FI1L7:PIIND TFIBtF/ai0M T11H SOUTH 10 fT3:T THEREOF. HIGH SCHOOL C YRJOINT NT UNION IBCA SCHOOL DISTRICT � 1OA0°�0�� tf o w ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER EET ONTARIO.CALIFORNIA 81782 (80010884811 u 71 106149144 �tln auta.atmtl vTYPICAL SECON—BRITTANY LANE TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING' t1O7roscM1 TIDAWSONSURVBYM b- SME.CMNEON WRNE COLTOK C ALIFORHIA 927248000 (900)18000118 L.OTSUNMARRY TABLE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT le.NOrAmw ' 1. mama NalLel��B a aAxw I0541 HUMBOLTSTREET N almw LOS ANAIITW.CALMRNIA 00720 at.ttew i n�iNo CONTACT: (SM79H7UCKER ROE Mt 7 tape (582)7889188 AnRNY 11TNlw.umw ttteaaNtmAA7A-WOOF DEVELOPER HOIHB,LLC 9145 AB11AYAVETNIE,SUITE F2 OOSTAMESA,CALIFORNIA ON28. OONTAC7: MN.TRACEYRASMMIQ 7 SINGLE FAMLYDEFACHED LOTS (114)210e0W GROSS PROJECT AREA -{.TBA! SUBWVIDEDAREA -42OAf OWNER DEVBAPEDAREA -S17A0(TRW) ROMEO N.OCTA CAB PATMAS.OCTA "Am IL A umaEVEIDPEDAREA -{.WAo MARIA LIZA INWBNf7A ORADEDPOOIPIONTAEA -OMAARRalb WdQW r) rO tl)u0A1fItl1U. GROSS DENSITY - IAT CAREOP AvmAGELDrAREA -26,2708F HONKS,LLC FJIYW RANDIG WN'AMDIIGASBNCtaLNNNl10000 3185AIRWAY AVENUE.SURE FZ sAVInEBTREEraTHI0Rmamm COSTAMESACALWORMA 92628 rtAttltcwxtAArnatetARertrfsn CONTACT: MLTRACEYRASZEVa10 GYM=cudwwtwtl lamr tIR' wrtwaraAa Aemaxxe°answar°onA1t AI412109850 ELEVATK6f/!10171 REVISIONS xmlmsrtll®uOO1MwPcmnaotlw CITY OF RANCHO clmaMONGA suBTT resat om.BETUEI1YGRoum I- ma S 6CYRf°"00f TENTATIVE MAP .... Tentative Tract No.18981 atEfr 4 0 • • Wt(MRD STREET I CL Ims. -------------- p ------ mac --------------- -A fill 11'";i u 29 r3 - " r; 7 7M.M. L )Jrq 9 Lu z SCALL P-3W r Al1B 17S'R7B91'[� WWDE DPA94W x1li"'M!, 9 x1912.5— A F �N. 7 ...... IN IIW AND- @- AFEj IT r z;—,A, N F7 L 0 A —Aw -A 0 TV r 711 JV1 IA�l vlz/�Il LE IL'. RESID ----------- � ----------- e*1 /,;1F 2f _ _ y/�``- � 1 vim ,\��- �/ �z- ��.�rt .� �' '�!, r �i/ I _ �t � .� < G—j t L L 11. REsT u I y Far- .595 LN REVISIONS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA suorr 18981 0�BMMMx1YG1WPR1 I- TENTATIVE MAP "A Tentative Tract No.18961 waer 2. 2 i I i CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN TENTATIVE MAP No. 18961 UTILITY PURVEYORS •' :WATER 4VCAMONBAWILLEV WATER DISTRICT 16MASKPORDBTREET i ® RANCHO CUCAMONOA CALIFORNIA 817304M PR(UE®r LOCA � ,40 IBU)86F2581 SEWER DOCM,oNDAVAU.EY WA,ER D78110CT RANCHOHFORDBIREET . RANCIW CIICAAlO10A�CMIFORNIA 817904199 ELECTRIC BOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 798,REDWOODAVENUE TIM- EAST ee FONTANA.CALIFORNIA RON M RM (80%9514108 a +r a a ++• OAS SWMESTLUG HIAA AVENUE COPAyANY19111 ® REREDLANDS.CALIFORNIA OW9 �1 I 1 001M°�°`�Om VICINITY MAP . 7EIEPN 5 VERNMOOMMUNIGAIMS I 1100 E PHILLIPS BOULEVARD.BUILDING to LEGAL DESCRIPTION POMONA,CALIFORWA 81788 W8284815 THE NORTHWEST OUARTEROF LOT 2.BLOCK 18,OF.CUCAMONM HOMESTEAD S: TYPICAL SECTION SAPPHIRE STREET ASSOCIATION LANDS.M THE CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF TRASH SURRIECWAETEINOUBTRIE8 NOT TO SAN BENAROM STATE OF CALFORNL AS PER IMP RECORDED N oasocHERaL AVF2nE WBOORS.PABE180F84% THEOFFN W7HECOUNTYRECORIN9L OF FONTANA.CALIFORNIA 02995 SAID COIMTY.EXCEPTOAIl1 WROM THE SOUIH2OFE6T THEREOF. . � (W9)887.8H7 SCHODLSIN ALTA LOMASCHOOL DISTRICT SITE ADDRESS AL ALOM%CALIFORNIA 01701-MI IATA OW.H p091 NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAPPHIRE STREET AND BRITTANY LANE (WB)IB"151 BlnC9a+ d NIGH SCHOOL CIIKfEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT mA9oRW+Nl 211 W FIFTH STREET m + m ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ONTARIO.CAL,FOMIA 81782 a v a (9L8)BBBBS1t u , r v 1081!91+11 N i TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING TYPICAL SECTION-BRITTANY LANE DAWSON SURVBYlNOj Irm W 578 T N, DRIVE CM 430,CALIFORNIACAL6RNU1 829748900 (DOR 1900018 EARTHWORK SUMMARY LOT SUMMMY TABLE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT - tm— No"F2lglnceftS VOLUIEOIFRAWCUT........................ 6A60C + =IV : 10041 HUM13OLY STREET LESS SHRWNAOELOSS(IM............. 595 CY i �1. LOSALTOS.CM1FdWN 00720 ADAIBTED CUT MATERIAL AVAMBLE...........:....... 5.MCY . nw.s MB F saNv CONTACT.M9 7UL703L RGE Mt ' 10" (s82)7802)7988189 i rover Ya.LDEOF RAW FILL........................ 40CY Awuoetar.+zA.sma LEGEND DEVELOPER PLUS SUBSIDENCE(ASSUME B) OCY wOAALImWnA•N,Oms 'I .M1NST®FSL MATERIAL AVAILABLE................... aCY NOBw7f800N0aReLLounOlOFi.TYPO7Nw NOHM J.0 9185MR1SAIRWVAYAVENUE.6UIE F2 78WOlE FAMILYIM L0CATMCF9TMWATOtY DETACHED LOTS p97gApNPEW91 COSTAMESk CAUFORMA 02M .I INET EXPORT ..................................... 5.8160 GROSS SITE AAFA •178 Al ®-. PROOSE06110EIUONIBTANVM CONTACT: Ma T7TACEYRA9�WSR (rt/)2t0♦WA NETSTTEARFA •4MA0 ,a— WOIGUF RRTEOFOWADEAftOWDRBC7881 di/088DEN317Y • 1.17 . /OIG1PlORBBLDIYWRUNE OWNER AVERMEIOf ATEA •28,2r95F ROMEOH omAwd PATtM&OCTA: DISTURBED AREA •BAB AOPw..ft..I%SlS"am 1Ne1) BN 9NBIf0FFeAiOReTAUCMI9 HAZEL B.OCTA: . DEVELOP®AREA •0291ASISI9.bAn8Tne1) R. ROWLIM .8r/WROL1AMNM b UNDEVELOPED AREA •118110 IN CARE OF: . GRADEDPOOFPRINTAREA •DANA(h.4 wWSlepo) 7C TOPOFCUD HOMA F1C ORyOFRANGID WfAM011611BD1O8WMR010098 F]0.9TNp tlIPERV10119ARE11 .2.12D SF To TOPCFGRKM 91MAIRWAYAVENUE.SUREF2 BArROle 871�felIMR0001lR® NEW80RBMDUSAREA •1BAWSFISTREEMSMEWIWLS) A MIEaCM� COSTA MESA,CJIOFORIM 92825 ssa+9y v1ARt p a oAW wool R&ROPMPERVIOUSAREA •08F CONTACT. (711)2106850 ATWODFoO O W1R9NwNprRWAD WILE• EIEVA.Im9A77 REVISIONS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBTT/BSST i OTTE-Bi01�Y OBOOIR Tm mwnp CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN WamnAtEiow v1x.s1. Tentative Tract No.18981 RZ- I www•m+.Aeww.l4®�R aEeT 1 4 i I . 0 • • S KLi J.1 J 'U !LENT PE ff M76-.'9 'G6 96 .. . D 7A C"y ITT F&L ........... EML I EA.811! T� I -J — . .....1.—:- 4 F H r�rr?!NCILS. to".0 'NouPe,MRs S 119,�qd F ',N WI!7�ul ;,i J" 7. s if PC jyj, T.; c. k LOT 3 E5 Z4.737 I Ml- T Mm.2 ...-1[ . VAMTH'NO DUYP Le -—------- OPOSED4'VMEf WAT19 -bM SF LOT2 0 PROPOIFDILRW96�- a. fw� 26 i A SID Iq -7 K 4 • -WIT IOU N� S. ILY Ell 24 -':5 u- ........ "A ....... .............. C-2 ... ..... .7 5 JENx III SIR— SMITARY SEWER NOTE CUSTOM kQj SL@0rtn§1pN MAGE EM SSPOSAL TO BE FUTIME HOUSE PLOrP REVISIONS by SEPTIC SYSTEMS INSTALLED ANDORADMOTOVE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBTT 16961 CM APERILOT&MASHOWES COMPLETEDONA BERKELEY OR"EML I— IlRB CONIMMUCTED LaTITY-LOTSAMS. CONCEPTUALSTSAt GRADING PLANRA oi1S 101 —.K— WIS.MBOUT"'. 8W.THEAEFORESEPTIC09 Tentative Tract No.18961 R:— ur.ualm+ f4RW aawnl Elrr ww row o rmn+mKmear N M Ir a it I°W IOW a °P v v Mw a v v r rs _ ra� reoeo I� I nrO`w ++• a a r �w�+sam rot. -arm' ' arnera+mr •Iv y" -------- r r MWA ' rBim.RKMFKtN ra lof t �nr°s�1pirr ` v wr v cwna++oaorrKs mwrw e aor n v m° i s r r w r w-w aor+ I I aor° REart.+a lett 4G _— P oaorr am+eo+mm+ow p0A QOa � e °� owvwoewa . +aanKramt �o�wa e i v I CJ1 v urt° P y �� s• ptqmA loam' 0' ommn • atmm+ r: eulara :...:r `ONTO+ REVOONS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUBTr 18881 oaeurtarcxuer� .a.� mres�srOaa,rB�: ®.. CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN Tentative Tract No.18981 4 15' 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 TIMI EGM 15' CONCEPTUAL w :!HOUSE ENVELO 42' COHCEPRIAL HOUSE ENVELOPE 2 1OTENTIAL ETAINING WALL t 8' 2 2 2 12 3 � p LOT 7 LOT 6 LOT 5 5' T Em l 21' HOUSE EPNVELOPE 3 .5' CONCEPTUALCONCEPTUAL •. . - HOUSEENVELOPE 1$' HOUSE ENVELOPE 16, 20' slergD,.• . ENIST. RET.WALL` f8 l, REVISIONS '�' "'�011�p10�p1p1 O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUM 18961 CUSTOM LOT SUBDMSION OTMBea7 q"GRouM l- woon FUTURE HOUSE FLO MIG �� --``�„a,,,,,� CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 0.OAE AHOPUFTE ON RE n In.CO"eTrania�LGIAs. Tentative Tract No.16961 4 4 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Dominick Perez September 2,2014 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 -TRACY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE,LLC-A request to subdivide one existing 4.76-acre parcel into 7 parcels within the Equestrian Overlay of the Very Low(VL)Residential Zoning District,located at the northeast comer of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane-APN: 1061-691-04. This project is categorically exempt.per Section 15332 (!n-Fill Development Projects) of the Caliifomia Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. Desian Parameters: The site, which has an existing single-family residence located in the northwest quadrant of the site, generally slopes from north to south and contains multiple trees that surround the residence as well as. light ground vegetation throughout the remainder of the property. The site is surrounded to the north,south,and west by existing single-family residences;and to the east is.surrounded by Floyd M:Stork Elementary School. The project involves the subdivision of an existing 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels for future-residential development. The site is located within the Equestrian Overlay of the Very-Low(VL) Residential Zoning District, which requires the proposed lots to most certain standards, including a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, an average lot size of 22,500 square feet, as well as minimum lot width and depth requirements specified in Section 17.36 of the Development Code, all of which this project complies with. The subdivision involves the creation of lots ranging in size from 21,780 to 40,000 square feet The project also includes a 15-1oot wide equestrian.trail that is adjacent to all lots within the subject tract as well as necessary drainage improvements adjacent to the trans in order to properly divert drainage flows accordingly. Future development of the site will' require additional street improvements along Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane as well as the creation of a new cul-de-sac(Brittany Court),which will run off of Brittany Lane and have a length of approximately 200 feet. Neiahborhood Mestina: The applicant has scheduled a neighborhood. meeting .for Wednesday, August 20,2014,which will be held at Floyd K Stork Elementary School(following the preparation of this report). Notification of the meeting was sent by the applicant to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the site. As of the date of the preparation of this report, Planning Department staff has been contacted by two neighboring residents; one expressed support and one expressed opposition of this project. The neighbor with concerns had comments regarding the type of future development of the site,increased traffic that the project may bring, drainage flows from the project site to the south, and view obstruction of the existing properties to the south. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Issues: None. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the project and forward the project on to the Planning Commission for final approval. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee discussed the project as well as concerns brought up at the neighborhood meeting, induding adding offsite drainage to the tract located to the south and proposed conceptual pad elevations. The Committee recommended approval of the project. Members Present: Fletcher,Oaxaca, and Granger Staff Planner. Dominick Perez EXHIBIT E Item D-17 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET September 10, 2014 and October 8, 2014 • TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 -TRACY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC-A request to subdivide one existing 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels within the Equestrian Overlay of the Very Low (VL) Residential Zoning District located at the northeast corner of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane-APN: 1061-691-04: This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332(In-Fill Development Projects)of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in-fill development consistent With the applicable General Plan designation and regulations_ Site Characteristics: The site, which has an existing ;Single-family residence located in. the northwest quadrant of the parcel,generally slopes from north to south and contains multiple trees that surround the residence as well as light ground vegetation throughout the remainder of the property. The site is surrounded to the north, south and west.by existing.single-family residences on half-acre:minimum lots, and is surrounded to the east.by Floyd M. Stork Elementary School. The residential tracts to the north and south incorporate equestrian trails throughout both developments. Design Parameters: The -site is located within the Equestrian Overlay of the Very-Low (VL) Residential Zoning District, which requires the proposed subdivision to meet certain standards, including the incorporation of local feeder trails throughout The project.. The trails have been designed to be 15 feet in width and located to allow access from the side and/or rear of each lot. As previously mentioned the existing residential communities to the north and south contain feeder trails that are consistent with the proposed trails. The trails will generally conform to the existing topography of the site which has a gradual slope from north.to south. The project also incorporates drainage improvements adjacent to the proposed trails. The attached Tentative Tract Map indicates the conceptual corral location on Lots 2 through 6, which is a requirement per Section 17. 122.010 of"the Development Code. • Staff Recommendation:. Staff recommends that the Trails Advisory Committee members review the,proposed Tentative Tract Map and recommend approval to the Planning Commission for final approval with the following conditions: 1. A copy of the revised Map showing the conceptual corral locations with correct dimensions on all lots (per.Development Code Section.17.122.01.0).shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to the Final Map Recordation. Staff Planner: Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner Attachments: A—Aerial. Map B— Proposed Tentative Tract Map C—Conceptual Grading Plan (Pages 1 —4) NOTE: Full size plans will be delivered to the Committee members Trails Advisory Committee Action: Major Issues/Questions: • Extension of trail to Lot Z. • Draining V-ditch drain correctly? • Bring back wall with project. • Sidewalk improvements. • • Double gates for lots. Pt11-1z-ay EXHIBIT F Item D-18 You are invited to a Neighborhood hborhood Meeting in order to welcome to attend a neighborhood Meeting development: You are the prop address questions or comments regar ing 18961 — HOIKE, LP: a request to subdivide TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TTM.-... .. ...- ., Low (VL). one existing 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels within a Very hire Street Residential District,istrict, located at the northeast corner o Sapp e — APN: 1061-691-04 and Brittany Lan August 20, 2013 6:00.— 7:30 pm Meeting Location: Floyd. M. Stork Elementary School 5646 Jasper Street Alta Loma, CA 91701 Contact Informat8on Developer: Hoike; LP Avenue, Suite F2 Ave 3185 Airway Costa Mesa, CA 92626 tracey�eCaland.com Tracey Raszewski —____-•l (714) 210-8850 x27 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Dominick Perez— Dominick. 4315 perez@cityofrc.us (909) 477-2750 EXHIBIT G i Item D-19 You are invited to a Follow-up Neighborhood Meeting You are welcome to attend the follow up meeting in order to address questions or comments regarding the proposed development that was originally discussed on August 20,2014: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TTM 18961— HOIKE, LP: a request to subdivide one existing 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels within the Equestrian Overlay of.the Very Low (VL)-Residential District, located at the northeast corner of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane—APN: 1061-691-04 Meeting Date: Tuesday, October 21; 2014 6:00—7:30 pm Meeting Location: Floyd M. Stork Elementary School Multipurpose Room 5646 Jasper Street Alta Loma, CA 91701 Contact Information Developer: Hoike, LP 1300 Quail Street, Suite 108 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tracey Raszewski—tracey@gcaland.com (949) 412-2807 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Dominick Perez— Dominick.perez@cityofrc.us CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (909) 477-2750 ext. 4315 ® OCT 0 8 2014 RECEIVED - PLANNING Item D-20 10/6/2014 Floyd M.Stork Elementary School-Google Maps Floyd M.Stork Elementary School (909)484-5060 -nclla V+sta Dr sella Vista or frballcro Ur Hidden Farm Rd &t 3 reviews Cgelfntt Ct a ,.a 5end3 Rd La Sends Rd 6 v Shang Ln _.........,- q g , c V+c>tra Or +3, Gallas P..Wh+daway st', ,. .Whnlaway St' n n Czrneiha Ct VaIIeY Vrew Sc- -: 25th St : Foiect Site `Meeting LocationOe 4z lside Rd Hillside Rd, - : ._ Willelde Rd` . b d m 1a:+n c 4` -orchard St - orchard St lei ' Rancho 6t >° `" `"}:< iµ Banana si.'. S$' m yr ✓ 7 Herrftage :, aF x,6�omm rn0'Park Floyd M Stork w �, �IemmtarySchaol dot a ' BcectYwood LV m E 24111 St yFmet st l ,! - ; . Muatata,M Wilson Ave Jen net St .. n a" .. a 'n + Sharp or Tho I. !rbrpd 91` b(d>ah(r! of "eulliani Ln 417 4:n<anila Dc.:: %Twd MawanhaDr Gardeme-Ave BnaelSt PumaloSt / - r�. 3 SunOuwer Sc RottbudS%''. Sunlloyrer st y m r S < Banyan St r? �; Banyan St BanyanSt ,. .. �;St.Pets and SL Paul m Map data 02014 Gy'�,lholt0§6koo1 https:!/ to0gle,Mrn/maps/place/Floyd+M.+Stork+Elementary+School/@34.152261,-117.621' ;z/data=!4m2!3mi!l sOx80a3373da3ba2a43:Ox69086Ob633c8b748 1/1 ® Hoike, LP October 24,2014 Dominick Perez Associate Planner Community Development-Planning City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729-0807 Subject: Tentative Track Map TTM 18961—August 20,2014 Neighborhood Meeting Summary Dear Mr. Perez. Below is the summary of the neighborhood meeting that was held on August 20,2014 from 6:00 pm to 7:30pm for application TTM 19861 which is a request to subdivide one existing 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels within the Equestrian Overly of the Very Low(VL)Residential District,located at the northeast comer of Sapphire Street and Brittney Lane—APN: 1061-691-04. Along with this letter we have attached the meeting invitation,the development handouts and the neighborhood sign in sheet. • Below is a list of concerns with responses brought up by the neighbors that attended the meeting. 1. Can certain lots be required to be I-story only to lessen the impact on the existing neighbor's views? Response: The city requires 25%of the lots to be limited to 1-story homes. Lot 1 has an existing home on it which is a I story. We agreed to work with the neighbors to provide 2 to 3 additional 1-story homes. Most likely lots 2, 7 and lot S could be 1 story. These are the lots adjacent to the two homeowners that attended the meeting and live adjacent to those lots. We will work with our grading contractor, civil engineer and architect to determine if any other lots would be too challenging to fit a 1-story on and meet all city requirements. In general we are not opposed to 1- story homes in this area, but since we are not the property owner or guaranteed homebuilder we do not feel comfortable limiting the property owner at the tentative map stage and believe these - details can be worked out with staff during the development review process for the architecture. 2. What kind of fence will be required along lot 7 where the existing homeowner has her fence now? Response: We will meet all city requirements regarding fencing and work with any neighbors during construction to address their concerns 3. Will the development of the property increase the storm water runoff already going to the existing catch basin at the cul-de-sac in Brittany Lane? Item D-22 Response: According to our Civil Engineer the city approved drainage plan indicates that there is capacity in the storm drain. The plans show that during a 100 year storm, the pipe will flow only half-full and that study took into consideration this property being developed. This study was also prior to the new on-site water retention requirements. Therefore, we are mitigating the concern by meeting the on-site water retention requirements per current requirements. 4. Can the pad elevations and slopes reflected on the conceptual grading plan be lowered? Response: According to our Civil Engineer it is important to note that the project does not propose pad elevations at this stage. Building envelopes and pad elevations are included on the Conceptual Grading Plan to demonstrate a feasible solution,per the requirements of the city at the Tentative Map application process. The pads that are shown were generally selected to balance cut and fill within each lot where possible, conform to the grading ordinance, and maintain positive flow toward the street. The slopes shown along the streets are proposed to meet the current elevation of the property.As if the streets were cut without any grading at all on the lots. This is just to demonstrate it is feasible to construct the street to provide access to the lots without actually grading these lots. Attachments: Neighborhood Meeting Notice of Invitation Meeting Location Map Mailing List Copy of Postage Receipt Dated August 5, 2014 Meeting Sign-in Sheet Handouts: Tentative Map No. 18961,2 pages Conceptual Drainage Plan,4 pages 1300 Quail Street, Suite 108 Newport Beach, C-A 9266o 714-987-2213 Item D-23 Hoike, I P • October 24, 2014 Dominick Perez Associate Planner Community Development-Planning City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729-0807 Subject: Tentative Track Map TTM 19861—October 21,2014 Follow-up Neighborhood Meeting Summary Dear Mr. Perez. Below is the summary of the follow-up neighborhood meeting that was held on October 21,2014 from 6:00 pm to 7:30pm for application TTM 19861 which is a request to subdivide one existing 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels within the Equestrian Overly of the Very Low(VL)Residential District,located at the northeast comer of Sapphire Street and Brittney Lane—APN: 1061-691-04. Along with this letter we have attached the meeting invitation,the development handouts and the neighborhood sign in sheet. ® Below is a list of concerns with responses brought up by the neighbors that attended the meeting. 1. What is the intent of the development? Response: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the current property owner's land so that they can continue to live in their home and sell off the 6 remaining lots. It is not the intent of the applicant to build out the project at this time. 2. How will each residential lot be required to be reviewed by the City? Response: The project would be required to complete a design review process required by the city. The design review process was explained to let the neighbors know that if the application is for 5 or more lots it is required to go through the City's public hearing process. If it is less than the application will be review at an administration level and that review will be tied to this application along with the concerns of the public. 3. When will the review of development take place?What is the process of continued development if approved?When would construction start? Response: The review process does not take place until the applicant submits an application for design review to the planning department. An approved Tentative Map is valid for up to 36 months with,the possibility of being granted extensions. It was additionally explained the City protects the intent of the development shown on this application after design review has been completed with their bonding process. • Item D-24 4. Is anyone,other than the current applicant,interested in purchasing the property to build it out? Response: Yes, there has been some interest, but no offers have been submitted 5. Where is the additional width of the bridal trail coming from?What will happen to the existing easement? Response: The.additional width is a requirement by the City to match the exiting width of the trail adjacent to the property. The current 15' easement for the trail will remain as is. The additional 15'of the bridal trail is coming from this property. 6. There currently is Utility Poles located north on the property,what is the plan for those utility poles and how is the project going to be serviced. Response: The utility poles located to the north will remain as is. New utility service will come south from Sapphire and turn east on northerly portion of Brittney Lane. 7. Are these lots going septic or public sewer? Response: The lots will all have septic service Attachments: Neighborhood Meeting Notice of Invitation .Meeting Location Map Mailing List Copy of Postage Receipt Dated October 21,.2014 Meeting Sign-in Sheet Handouts: Tentative Map No. 18961,2 pages Conceptual Drainage Plan,4 pages 1300 Quad Street, Suite 108 Newyort Beach, Cil g266o 714-987-2213 Item D-25 I-, Privileged and Confidential Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis(RECA) I � :.j .;• Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis (RECA) LThe MIG Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis(RECA)provides a basic overview of potential natural resources associated with a property. This form provides information utilizing govern menta l.and . industry databases(such as, United States Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS)Critical Habitat maps, National Wetland Inventory(NWI), United States Geological Society(USGS)quadrangle maps)and a L review of available aerial photography.. This information is subject to limitation set forth on this form (see Terms and Conditions). On-site surveys are required to confirm these findings and/or to submit information to public agencies. L For additional information, please contact Laura Moran (501)845-7549, lauram@MIGcorp.com u Property Owner's Name Hoike, LLC City, County: Rancho Cucamonga, and Property Address: 3185 Airway Avenue, San Bernardino Suite F-2 Costa Mesa,CA 92626-4619 Latitude/Longitude/Parcel APN 1061-691-04 Approximate Acreage: 5.12 Number 0 Attached Figures X Aerial Photograph ❑ Topographic Map • ❑ Potential Sensitive Habitat(wetland,water, riparian features) ❑ Critical Habitat for Federally listed species ❑ Cultural or Historical Resources X NRCS Soils Map X Other:CNDDB Map;Site Vegetation Map Environmental Resources Identified On-Site: ❑ Wetlands ❑ Hydric Soils ❑ Streams, lakes or ponds J ❑ Riparian habitat ❑ USGS mapped streams ❑ Critical habitat for federally endangered species J ❑ Special status plant and/or wildlife species:documented occurrence within the property ❑ Other(other potential issues may include sensitive and/or rare habitats) MRCS soils located on-site include:No hydric soils noted on site. -� Spc-Soboba stony loamy sand,2 to 9 percent slopes I J 1 IAC ((-a-f -]• EXHIBIT H 1 Item D-26 J • i Privileged and Confidential Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis(RSCA) J Cultural Resources located on-site include: A review of the National Register of Historic Places did notidentify any cultural resources on the Subject Site.Only one site is listed within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located approximately 6 miles l southeast of the project site(Pacific Electric Etiwanda Depot,7092 Etiwanda Avenue). J A list of sites included on the National Register of Historic Places can be found at the following website: http://www.nps.gov/nr/research/ Special status plant and wildlife species with potential to occur within.the county of interest .as determined by federal and/or state natural resource databases: J There are twelve federally endangered species,two federally threatened species,-and one proposed threatened species with the potential.to occur within the nine quadrangle area around the Rancho Cucamonga study site.Additionally,there.are ten state endangered and one state threatened species within the same study location. Special status species known to occur in the vicinity of the project are associated with the Cucamonga Canyon and associated drainages/habitats and are not expected to occur at the project site. Table 1.Federal and state listed species with potential to occur in the following quadrangles: Cajon, Cucamonga Peak, Devore,Fontana,Guasti,Mt.Baldy,Mt.San Antonio,Ontario,and Telegraph Peak Species Listing Status 1.2 Scientific Name Common Name Federal State . '•,•:E,''.17�� '•tr.-,t .� - .'g, -^"a{{:�� :7�'" ?'?;: �rht*fin- ;s?:.- :;: e.,' .-c.;:,';;. ] ,;,rxktwh^�,�j- t.....:.,wt�+.e�..v%sr�':.•..�.,� •. , `' :'3aEr� i ti;; •v:"f `'�"'" . 6 . , t-• ,"�'- s&-;;,�F.,,r •cr�3N-�''� ,"S• . ', ,.•�" •G:fi.s �r-, rs^ �j�:r.T- � ,-,. �.' �.5.�,°�e`.�'j7:a .c �na..9•• ,,...;::' s� '�'.', Anaxyrus californicus arroyo toad E SSC Rana muscosa southern mountain yellow- E E,SSC legged frog Batrachoseps gabrieli San Gabriel slender salamander — -- Taricha torosa Coast Range newt -- SSC —l. (. �t'Y. .:. �'A �1�x'e�un �•L�-'>•.5� ;r 'e'� ^ • fin' •� . 1' Asio otus long-eared owl -- -- SSC - Empidonax traillii extimus southwestern willow flycatcher E E Dendroica petechia yellow warbler — SSC brewsteri Vireo bellii pusillus least Bell's vireo E E I 77 J 2 J Item D-27 �-, Privileged and Confidential Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis(RECA) ii L_ Polioptila californica coastal California gnatcatcher T SSC californica L._� Athene cunicularia burrowing owl -- SSC i u Artemisiospiza belli belli Bell's sage sparrow F7 Agelaius tricolor tricolored blackbird -- SSC L Cypseloides niger black swift -- SSC Aimophila ruficeps southern California rufous- canescens crowned sparrow aButeo swainsoni Swainson's hawk -- T Coccyzus americanus western yellow-billed cuckoo Proposed E occidentalis Threatened V.gggg7affis ON, C- 41 Rhinichthys osculus ssp.3 Santa Ana speckled dace -- SSC Siphateles bicolor Mohave tui chub E E mohavensis Catostomus santaanae Santa Ana sucker T SSC nGila orcuttii arroyo chub -- SSC NO aWORE W- m-_ 11110 Taxidea taxus American badger -- SSC Dipodomys merriami San Bernardino kangaroo ga oo rat E SSC parvus I Eumops perotis californicus western mastiff bat. .. __. -- _ SSC Ovis canadensis nelsoni desert bighorn sheep j — Chaetodipus fallax fallax northwestern San Diego pocket -- SSC mouse _l Lasiurus xanthinus western yellow bat -- SSC _I 3 I Item D-28 J • Privileged and Confidential Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis(RECA) Lepus californicus bennettii San Diego black-tailed — SSC jackrabbit Neotoma lepida San Diego desert woodrat -- SSC l intermedia Perognathus longimembris Los Angeles pocket mouse — SSC J brevinasus J Chaetodipus fallax pallidus pallid San Diego pocket mouse — SSC J Chaetodipus fallax fallax northwestern San Diego pocket SSC mouse 1 Nyctinomops pocketed free-tailed bat -- SSC femorosaccus ] Lasiurus cinereus hoary bat -- — Microtus californicus south coast marsh vole — SSC Istephensi J Neotamias speciosus lodgepole chipmunk= -- -- speciosus TT,,}}...... ,....... ,. Mi r.,. 'sr' : , vd�+{(:lT:'!Ck4 A''a t 0,1 v' y 'R+ r wr Phrynosoma blainvillii coast horned lizard -- SSC Aspidoscelis tigris coastal whiptail -- -- stejnegeri Thamnophis hammondii two-striped garter snake -- SSC Lampropeltis zonata California mountain kingsnake -- SSC (parvirubra) (San Bernardino population) J Anniella pulchra pulchra silvery legless lizard — SSC 1 Charina trivirgata rosy boa -- — I Rhaphiomidas terminatus Delhi Sands flower-loving fly E - -� abdominalis i J 4 J J Item D-29 r Privileged and Confidential Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis(RECA) i , Cicindela tranquebarica greenest tiger beetle ® viridissima Callophrys mossii hidakupa San Gabriel Mountains elfin -- -_ Lbutterfly J _ Plebejus saepiolus aureolus San Gabriel Mountains blue butterfly � I J Diplectrona californica California diplectronan caddisfly Li RN Canbya candida� white pygmy-poppy Heuchera parishii Parish's alumroot i ( Opuntia basilaris var. short-joint beavertail UUU brachyclada Asclepias nyctaginifolia Mojave milkweed Dodecahema leptoceras slender-horned spineflower E E Chorizanthe xanti var. white-bracted spineflower ® leucotheca aSymphyotrichum San Bernardino aster defoliatum Claytonia lanceolata var. Peirson's spring beauty peirsonii -- -- Horkelia cuneata var. mesa horkelia puberula J Oreonana vestita woolly mountain-parsley 7 Arctostaphylos glandulosa San Gabriel manzanita ssp.gabrielensis "- -- Monardella australis ssp. Jokerst's monardella jokerstii -- -- Streptanthus bernardinus Laguna Mountains jewelflower I J 5 Item D-30 Privileged and Confidential Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis(R ECA) I Chorizanthe parry!var. Parry's spineflower parryi a Eriogonum microthecum Johnston's buckwheat var.johnstonii J Linanthus concinnus San Gabriel linanthus -- -- I Ambrosia monogyra singlewhorl burrobrush -- -- Lycium parishii Parish's desert-thorn -- -- i J Eriastrum densifolium ssp. Santa Ana River woollystar 1 E E sanctorum Arenaria paludicola marsh sandwort E E Lepidium virginicum var. Robinson's pepper-grass _ -- robinsonii Senecio aphanactis chaparral ragwort -- -- Chloropyron maritimum salt marsh bird's-beak E E ssp. maritimum Monardella pringlei Pringle's monardella -- -- } Phacelia stellarls . Brand's star phacelia -- -- Navarretia prostrata prostrate vernal pool navarretia -- Thysanocarpus rigidus rigid fringepod -- -- Dudleya multicaulis many-stemmed dudleya -- -- Monardella macrantha ssp. Hall's monardella hallii — — J .. _.... .. ... .. Orobanche valida ssp. Rock Creek broomrape 'j valida — -- Berberis nevinii Nevin's barberry E E Symphyotrichum greatae Greata's aster -- -- Astragalus leucolobus Big Bear Valley woollypod — -- J i 6 J J Item D-31 L! Privileged and Confidential Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis(RECA) I J Lupinus peirsonii Peirson's lupine i i._I� Nemacladus secundiflorus Robbins'nemacladus var. robbinsii Astragalus lentiginosus var. San Antonio milk-vetch antonius I � L, Oxytropis oreophila var. rock-loving oxytrope oreophila lr1 Li . Parnassia cirrata var. San.Bernardino grass-of- cirrata Parnassus Lewisia brachycalyx short-sepaled lewisia Sidalcea neomexicana Salt Spring checkerbloom -- _ Helianthus nuttallii ssp. �y parishii Los Angeles sunflower Botrychium crenulatum scalloped moonwort Botrychium minganense mingan moonwort • Calochortus plummerae Plummer's mariposa-lily Schoenus nigricans black bog-rush Calochortus palmeri var. Palmer's mariposa-lily palmeri 't Sagittaria sanfordii Sanford's arrowhead Lilium parryi lemon lily Sphenopholis obtusata prairie wedge grass Muhlenbergia californica California muhly Cladium californicum California saw-grass Calochortus clavatus var. slender mariposa-lily a gracilis Juncus nodosus knotted rush J I® 7 J Item D-32 Privileged and Confidential Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis(RECA) Carex occidentalis western sedge -- FOOTNOTES 1) Listing status codes are:E=endangered,T=threatened,C=candidate,SSC=species of special concern. 2) Source of federal and state listing:California Natural Diversity Database http:Himaps.dfg.ca.gov/viewers/CNDDB QuickViewer/list county_species.asp A field visit to the project site (APN 1061-691-04) was conducted on May 1, 2014 by biologist Laura Moran (Director of Ecosystem Restoration Services, MIG) and Savannah Richards (Project Assistant, MIG). The field visit was conducted to assess the existing conditions of the project site, including characterizing and delineating the vegetation communities and associated wildlife habitats and evaluating the potential for these habitats to support special-status species and sensitive communities. It was determined that existing on-site vegetation consists of Eucalyptus trees located in the northeast portion of the site, an Elderberry tree located in the.central portion of the site, a stand of Yerba Santa located near the southeast corner, pine trees and.various ornamental plants located along the site's eastern boundary, and mustard and Datura located in the southeast corner..The western and central portion of the site is characterized by ruderal plants such as Erodium (see Figure 5, Vegetation Map). Representative photographs of the project site we taken during the field visit and are included in this report along with a photo location map (see Figure 6, Photo Location Map). Plant and animal occurrences documented by the California Natural Diversity Database are identified on Figure 4, CNDDB Plants/Wildlife, respectively. Special status plant and wildlife species with documented occurrences in the vicinity of the Subject Site: No special status plants or animals were identified in the CNDDB database as occurring on the Subject Site. The following provides information for species observed within.one mile of the Subject Site during the field survey: Plants:None Critical Habitat:None Wildlife:None MINIMx The following Environmental resource permits and approvals may be necessary based on a review of potential biological resources identified in data sources: ❑ Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit ❑ CWA Section 401 Certification(state and/or EPA) X Other: clearance surveys for nesting birds prior to any site disturbance in accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and CA Dept of Fish and Wildlife Code. 8 > a Item D-33 Privileged and Confidential Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis(RECA) Carex occidentalis western sedge OTES ting status codes are:E=endangered,T=threatened,C=candidate,SSC=spe f special ern. 2) So f federal and state listing:California Natural Diversity Database http: 1'., s.dfg.ca.gov/viewers/CNDDB_QuickViewer/list—county—spe ' .: p M Special status pla wildlife species with documented occurrences in ,` .�icinity of the Subject Site: No special status plants als were identified in the CNDDB do -as occurring on the Subject Site. a The following provides informa ° ', r species observed with" le of the Subject Site. Plants:None y e Critical Habitat:None Wildlife:None ��;c:,-a�ka'Fr`a;�.^"'... ..rr.,;:�.,. ..,'sti'.�.%,t.,,. •a,."ux. i T^-:' rw �5, .a,: C.. rd**«„a:� .:, ?dc £-:B.3k:?9ri..n"��'k�:53=�T.�i'.'iP.. +�e"-;i'r.«•�•.3?n �j �1� •:ry��.�':;jt, or''��Q� �,' �6a.'s�4 x4. .•NICO �'1� a+: U ... n..til,fi`a�' ..•� .:.,.- �. '. -^n The following Environmental resource is and ap ` Is may be necessary based on a review of potential biological resources identif ,. data sources: �= ❑ Corps of Engineers Section 404 t ❑ CWA Section 401 Certificatio '- ` to and/or EPA) X.Other: clearancesurveys sting birds prior to any site distur'' °�.6 in accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act Dept of Fish and Wildlife Code. r,;y,.� ^••4"�P:St'''�.'"^.4y.^_?:', d;4 �y..a:..,..r t«N...7�,:r.:� '` - `� d....:.':y. ... .. •4'-'9'-I.-:3F' Sat"„,�9'n t.. n � - Sa* c""j�ta;'„�`s-.”�'«�,,'�;.. "..�n..,r,:'�•r,.T wFe. - '�"7:"`:�R ` 'i.o^.,.,,r .:e3-• 7% M"...c -ti. i.ard".'�A' ii zl:n� s .fix.. .a, r,'•"'.. '�nli.+^.a [[..aa "�' SS-k:, ...[7.kxvA�,- 'fUY-.>i�r.: aSi.�'"•�,°mrF�u}d�`:. �; '' -�r r. �;� ��:�, Potential future ' es: ❑' Formal d ,° ion of wetlands and waters of the U.S. ❑ On-sit gical resources assessment ❑ Ana previous studies within roperty,if such studies exist X ; A of local ordinances potentially applicable to development on the property ❑ plant surveys ildlife surveys - - - TERMS AND CONDITIONS This report is a reconnaissance level electronic investigation of the property site and is not a substitute for more extensive and necessary field work.It is meant to provide the Client with a general assessment of potential Environmental issues based on interpretation of the most current electronic data that we found.This report is not a"Corps Jurisdictional Wetland and Waters Delineation"and should not be interpreted as such.This report is meant to provide general information on the potential presence of ty f sensitive species and habitats and is not a formal assessment that may be required for project approval 8 l� Item D-34 Privileged and Confidential Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis(RECA) by any local,state,or federal agency.Relevant information such as species occurrences and regulatory requirements are dated and change regularly and thus should not be relied upon as a final determination. The data resources utilized for the publication of this report do not provide a complete biological inventory for any property site. These resources include,but are not limited to:CNDDB*,State resource agency electronic inventory records,NWI records,USGS topographic quadrangle maps,NRCS soils data, FEMA flood data,and ArcGIS aerial images.For many sites a field visit,formal assessment and consultation with the appropriate agency may be required in order to determine the presence of sensitive species or resources.This report is only intended to be used by the client as a snapshot of the potential Environmental issues associated with a property to better aid preliminary property engineering and design decisions.This report may also be useful to ascertain the need for future biological studies to satisfy regulatory requirements. Potential permits and approvals and recommended additional studies are dependent upon the specific project.description.The Recommendations section is meant to give the Client a broader understanding of the regulatory framework and requirements that may apply to the property based on our interpretation of data considered.Though the information provided is relatively general,MIG staff are available to answer specific questions regarding the potential Environmental issues and potential regulatory.requirements that may associated with the property. MIG is qualified and available to advise on regulatory and permitting issues as published in federal and state regulatory notices,however,the Client is advised to also consult with their independent legal counsel to interpret recent statutory,administrative and decisional authority as they relate to wetlands and endangered species compliance.The Client's legal counsel should also be consulted for action(s) that may involve any activities required prior to permit issuance.A landowner assumes responsibility for all actions conducted on the.land that may lead to enforcement actions by federal or state government or regulatory agencies.All parties understand that the regulatory and legal Environmental for this type of project are constantly changing and.that concerns expressed by governing agencies and the public cannot be predicted as they relate to the proposed project. MIG is not responsible for unforeseen circumstances that may require additional field work,agency consultation and/or public hearings. MIG is available to assist you in resolving such issues that may arise,and can provide the Client with a formal scope of work and cost estimate for identified tasks. Any and all work product related to this Report or the assessments contained therein are confidential and are prepared for the Client's use only.All such aforementioned work product may not be distributed,copied,or utilized in any manner other than to provide an overview of potential Environmental.issues associated with the subject property.Any other uses of the work product related to the assessments are strictly prohibited.MIG will not be held liable for unapproved use of its work product. This work product is subject to the Client's acceptance of MIG's General Terms and Conditions, including limits of liability,provided under separate cover. *The California Natural Diversity Database(CNDDB)is a"natural heritage program"and is part of a nationwide network of programs overseen by NatureServe(formerly part of The Nature Conservancy). NDDB data are available in a variety of ways.MIG's Geographic Information Systems(GIS)technicians use electronic files received from the CNDDB dataset to create the different colored occurrence locations depicted on the map.These polygons are rarely precise species occurrence locations and may 9 Item D-35 l: Privileged and Confidential Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis(RECA) a vary widely in size and shape.Because the locational information is not always precise,the size of the circles represents a range in which the species may be found in that particular location;however,this information must be verified if suitable habitat is present on your site.linear features generally indicate location within a riparian or stream corridor.Sensitive species information also may not be disclosed for some species to prevent illegal collection. In addition,it cannot be assumed that no rare,endangered,or special status species are located in an area if a CNDDB query did not produce an occurrence on the map or in documented occurrence data. Ir:{ f � 10 Item D-36 Privileged and Confidential Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis(RECA) GLOSSARY Term Definition Blue Line Stream A perennial or intermittent stream so designated and delineated by U.S.G.S. as shown as solid or dash-dot blue line on a quadrangle map.Generally Identifies streams considered to be habitat for fish and aquatic organisms. California Natural The CNDDB is a program that inventories the status and locations of rare Diversity plants and animals.CNDDB staff work with partners to maintain current Database(CNDDB). lists of rare species as well as maintain an ever-growing database of mapped locations for these species. Electronic data is available through NatureServe and/or state natural resource agencies. Critical Habitat Specific geographic areas,whether occupied by listed species or not,that are determined to be essential for the conservation and management of listed species,and that have been formally described in the Federal Register. Endangered The classification provided to an animal or plant in danger of extinction within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. Hydric Soils A soil that formed under conditions of saturation,flooding or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. Jurisdictional Wetland A jurisdictional wetland and waters delineation is a focused evaluation of and Waters Delineation indicators of wetlands and waters within a property.The methods used are based on the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual ("Corps Manual";Environmental Laboratory 1987)and appropriate Regional Supplements to the Corps Manual(i.e,Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation manual.Mid West Region V2). Jurisdictional The U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(Corps)regulates"Waters of the United Wetland/Waters States"under Section 404 of the Clean Water Am"Waters of the U.S."are defined broadly as waters susceptible to use in commerce,including interstate waters and wetlands,all other waters(intrastate water bodies, including wetlands),and their tributaries(33 CFR 328.3).Potential wetland areas,according to the three criteria used to delineate wetlands stated in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual(Environmental Laboratory 1987),are identified by the presence of(1)hydrophytic . vegetation,(2)hydric soils,and(3)wetland hydrology. Areas that are inundated for sufficient.duration and depth to exclude growth of hydrophytic vegetation are subject to Section 404 jurisdiction as"other waters"and are often characterized by an ordinary high water mark (OHWM).Other waters,for example,generally include lakes,rivers,and streams.The placement of fill material into"Waters of the U.S." (including wetlands)generally requires an individual or nationwide permit from the Corps under.Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. NWI-National Wetlands The National Wetlands Inventory(NWI)of the U.S.Fish&Wildlife Service inventory produces information on the characteristics,extent,and status of the Nation's wetlands and deepwater habitats.The National Wetlands Z Inventory.information is used by Federal,State,and local agencies, academic institutions,U.S.Congress,and the private sector.Congressional . 11 MIG Item D-37 Privileged and Confidential Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis(RECA) GLOSSARY Term Definition mandates in the Emergency Wetlands Resources Act require the Service to map wetlands,and to digitize,archive and distribute the maps. Protocol-level This term is used to refer to assessments or surveys that are done following specific regulatory agency guidance and that are suitable for submittal to the appropriate agency. Riparian Refers to the area or subsequent vegetation adjacent to a waterway such as a stream or river. Sensitive Species A species of plant or animal that is rare,threatened or endangered and warrants protection by the state or federal government.This term includes fully protected species and state and federal threatened and endangered species. Threatened The classification provided to an animal or plant likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. Wetland For regulatory purposes under the Clean Water Act,the term wetlands means"those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support,and that under normal circumstances do support,a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.Wetlands generally include swamps,marshes,bogs and similar areas." O . r r.. 12 MIG Item D-38 u ...... ....,...v - .:......:.'.•..�:::.':NSI .....` .:� Q.9�SEC m'.,a ` ticado dsna AW .: :�....f At S{.:..::� �'n .. � ���✓�i.�' .. :?-. �- . > lean,G9c'...'.i. •:g .... K S.ernGn AY!.. ,:;a s. ,I i .. •.,. OPtn911c£Y�cy .:'_;.L.,a vac 6wtnitfq!` . ,•:� � t;o - t `... ...... +c. ... ..� let , : " Hh SY r : ✓, / J'. , d. Source:GCgL--ups,2"" Regional r9ttnq.:•,..,.: ..�:.: ., ��: '. ���. '. ca°LA � .. �..Yw.Fl.Oo'rada:�. ems. Cb iliside Rd�.�....... ... .......... �...Hi(lcide.l3dJ .; Perlampnce,•,..,.. .. R{illsiile Rd..... • Hillside Itil , ...�- .Conn traction.:... .: ..' P . oiniing .. First Ghoic6:Maid ;� Orchil David"ON OrTnar[I St.... .. p..':. . . 1tT .. .. t.tlt119Vi7r........ . .. p, . 8 M.51tnY:: .. Q... : Sefvues'.,'�: - 'Yds � $IrnGIC. •: � ,: ¢s• ,n,.�toma�� t .6 .. ,.. .�• 'rr_''•;Elementary � .Ph.ggreplry_`. Sd1.d��;:. d t 3ite . y. �. net St . p. ..,�hureu(OILr tl.Si.::....::. .•':_..:. sMoro!�:luedSl. ..CO. ughbrid ST _ 3i..' mxA6 d 5t...: .: knaAr:e....'. 40 tllefielM1. • ,�4 C7 Gam Source:Google P:,gaps.'.014 Vicinity J http:/hww,.migmm.romo 951.737-92-22 _-- _ Figure 1 . Regional and Vicinity MaF Tentative Tract Map 18961 Haggle-Ireland Rancho Cucamonga,California Item D-39 l I 1 i mr.a Inwly Eel k'nropr rid r n'h „l�rojecl Ebcat�or E.3Vf+1 Y � I i • E201�•, - Uerylq/k • .3{�Nu` a1W�.Y<Y zeo � &wth{NaCiwY_ ai ::mxs.r ,fir"J¢�^r• .AI ._-.,, '3� �-..,} _d 19m51 u3Aa'hW Eynby'. , __.t 141Y St 31 s1 `40, S 6""1'r i r •r., Regional awY R^➢I canm,clron '-- �'- —'�'a�rs - r emu ar°" z `fir _� va Eu�„rad.r a Jsnac CO%•N.FfEU,N illside fill N bde Rd. he lwmwrrce _ HAsrda Ild Fit do Hd Lon tr Yon Mf mN4y i 1'e.Yl n rd'Iwn, A cl mtl cf I Fol Paw I - 4e�... Se ncese U NM.S"arM - 1pe Lone c UW Damlk&InYMa., s9 r. Phut 1dD bflr, v eu 3h Project Sfte 6cro woo0l J<.r7rmv 5b N c> 1 tlwou7l L•+d s1 0 t1dIY Fa 3 ^,nnlenn as �� '.hose@ud sr .t4 CT D tlleleln S q 6 f to [ Sw¢ Go4a Maps 2014 — - Viclnity '1 httpl/w J.Migeom.wm.951-28]-9.."22 Figure 1 . Regional and Vicinity Mar Hogle-Ireland Tentative Tract Map 18961 Rancho Cucamonga,California Item D-39 in 3 O A 0 Sax.C-:rogk M.� 214 „S,_nP- Rugure 20 Aerr'W Map Tentative Tract Map 18961 Rancho Cucamonga,California w 0 3 O a Noma 9 cas [u caner ation sry 3Pri Cgr�vatipe g,ervboe SpC: Soboba stony loamy sand, 2-9%slopes htteJlrrvnv.mig:em.cor.•951-787-9-l' --- Figure igure 3• Soil Map SM Bogle-Iraiand Tentative Tract Map 18961 Rancho CP )nga,California r' r Almond S' vrrsutnrE,.ltut Et Fan S'�tAs Je��cr.nn t'`f = / . i s "Jlrai4 D) S ... J 7� /x AtsitTyran cafi(attacns a. r�.° - •sruPa,'tvl Ru ij ,sfFr.�tFf i` y - S a RO Rtoo2t61r 3t1}CI)a'i9; in rt;�, Project Site t At r4s€tsiq stus / 3�✓ ' tie /' :tio,.'} 01, fi £ } I�rvarsldiarotutu+nalFansage�Scrub x fX Atmophi a�tu�firxr� rn k eps o4afti ;i�isv r`a+`w'yl'u"E �i f�res2Kasns 9ep*J9 ln�rmaUla .i" ,%,/,,�!' ,� � 'y2� ✓�. x '4%�t Xr' J I' f f,1 f�r to Si,ui c California Dep tmenMlfish and Wildlife,CaFhrnw Naw I DPoemily Database 2014 No1lo Sra/e Plant(80m) Terrestrial Comm.(80m) [`* ® Plant(specific) Terrestrial Comm.(specific) ® Plant(non-specific) ® Terrestrial Comm.(non-specific) Plant(circular) ® Terrestrial Comm.(circular) Multiple(80m) Animal(80m) ® Aquatic Comm.(80m) Multiple(specific) Animal(specific) ® Aquatic Comm.(specific) Multiple(non-specific) Animal(non-specific) ® Aquatic comm.(non-specific) Multiple(circular) 0 Animal(circular) . 0 Aquatic Comm.(circular) Sensitive EO's(Commercial only) Figure 4. CNDDB Plants/Wildlife Nagle-Ireland Tentative Tract Map 18961 Rancho Cucamonga,California Item D-42 f ' I j. I I a� L , i I � R .iii>.. i I . I I i Sappr,re St 41A .. . r. �. tS wag RM IWO UTZ MN EM IMM CEO 1111111" ROM ZO IM Lim Em ma 16 11 13 14 12 10 1P 9 3 B 1 18 v ° A 19 a t5 4 7 3 4 5 6 1 2 Source:Google Earth 2014 Photos taken by MIGlHogle-Ireland.May 2014 HAND Not to We •as,-,e,nu Figure 6. Photo Location Map Hogle4reland Tentative Tract Map 18961 Rancho Cucamonga,California II 1 y k 1 Facing east Facing west 5 r 1 A 1 30 Facing northwest ® Facing north 1 'l 1 1 1 1 5Q Facing northwest © Facing west 1 ommm•95F]BIA12 Site Photographs ® HogbAreland Tentative Tract Map 18961 Rancho Cucamonga,Cal'rfornia Item D-45 k3 f�a� � 2 1 i T e s iL ti Kag•,�- ,.x_a _ Q Ground squirrel burrows ® Facing west i Fry'- Qs Facing north fo Facing southeast >> Facing northeast 12 Facing east 9=1.187_rn Site Photographs OM Hogle-Ireland Tentative Tract Map 18961 Rancho Cucamonga,California Item D-46 4 Q „xe > q _ F A�ca'F�f� p tis is Facing west Q Facing northwest ,z t J "S ©i Facing northwest ® Facing north r ¢ � Y : S 0 Facing east ® Facing north h„P,,„ Mi�- m.",.,a,AM Site Photographs Pogle-Ireland Tentative Tract Map 18961 Rancho Cucamonga,California Item D-48 TENTATIVE MAP No. 18961 elan UfILIfY PURVEYORS :ac W wATFR WarvaxwvNaar weaaavmwn � x� y I W W AMRONOB111EEr �{' PwralvwrwwnwewFowaF,v+Ta zm � NOMenas+ eEwXR ewwwwlarvwEr wATFRvwlwa J wIVA1WFGPD BmPFr RvacrrowrAMvaaw,cujPonxu maaBerw � � p ryvganaal 1( W ELECIILW aOVIXww CI11FLIwuEDIGgI COMPMIY - - Mn NE+NC'MOOvnVEHUE tpt Fawku,waFoaa vase MvMssra+W 6l9 MIMWGILFC(BLpIPAXY +al MEsrwooXUAYFMIE NEOLvawv.rxEawu vzm '^^'�M'elM'f (a%Ws1aa VIdNIT'MAP m aME TEIEPXIXIE VFARCW COMMIMIGT1w18 vemER1eLP9BdAEVMv.BUl101xo In - MaNxxe GMGrq ri,urpau efaW laajeavav+e IYPICgI SECTION SAPPHIRE SWEET Tpa9N BIPR29 wAB1EMA1BfNEs xofroeWf vemcxFRRr nvExuE LEGAL OESCRIPPON Nw)Mairtr TIEIpRVMIFBF WM1FA0i L0T2 BIDLK1B.Oi Cw.WYIW XLME6IFAD acxvvuwe eLrAlaau eellaa.vlBwla raBvcunoN lwve.Ix TxElaavoF PNA:NOIA1GWMlACOUHIYOF t6J WELNEIAMB S°PBENxMmw0.6TnrEOF VLFdWIk/SPFNFW RECGIU® AIrA LOMA GVIFOBNM a+mide2l Ig/Jp +1'gMly, IXfFPfI�G•IT1ElEFM1OMTXE5Wa11'A FEEaTEI✓EfF. OF (if)IN6161 XgX8GO0. GWTEY.gMTUMIOXMIwI BCMOGL0181NCf S11 W.FIFMBaNEET ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER vxmav,culFawu etas Imej veBesn +W+an.a a TGPoo "CM WG vO TYPICAL SECTION-BRITTANY LANE xvrmeule DAW90NSVRVHYDIG,I: ' 6MECMREON ORNE WLlIX1.C.WPgwln BAw%W NBa)eaomte GEOTECHNICALCONSULTA Nnal.e1So�mm9 ¢wi IawlxwaarBmPEr ' �� Loa wwnn,warvRxu arm nFi WIRnLT: Me l(EfMTUO®(N(aE B{I �f �ilaeBBaeO DEVELOPER HOHOi,LLC M. a+a A I mvnr Av Em re.e u r B n COBTn MFBM WIFQBIN BLID axv1EFM11LvvETMlm Lom Cbaan4T. 914)21 M@YYv +O x+vmW GNGBBnmRcrww •anb amvMOEnuvw •x�b - ONTlER OEVELOPEOMFA •v.1rb(Tnla Rw.£vH VCPAMPNIM B.p.Tk UNCkY8,VmM .4W/c SLEW�AGAWRn GNKfvFWRNwIINFA •oMbIVMNWaa�) a"m.wvlle rrmavwem - 1.n "�je, wWa�aF: CIIYGFMxL1UOFA'MMUB9OYW.x.1P)0 nvFwvE LOtutl'w a�10Y 31e5�AY1YENUILWMF2 merAMFaA eulrvewA aea NNTACE: Mxrmf.Er W9FW91a v+0avaa maw, kVBIwaB VO°'M''�Na010' CITVOF RANCHO CUCMIONOA TEBUBTT 18881 Q OatseevvIDaeGFOw4Ir ......:..� NT Tied MAP orM Tentative Tract No.18961 �"t z Ok - FA L64 gal SM, AM CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN TENTATIVE MAP No. 18961 t I f I UnLRY PURVEYORS wATel nwnRw Vw WwATew4snxnF IwbralvoRnemEEr RAxcxq LvnGArxvfl�owFomM v,razrW PllryvnaPn NlgEgf 1°cA ' W sswm arwxoxaAvnLln'wnmolsrwa ,aPPPASHP4mamEEr wNcnowru.M]XaAvllrawu nrnzrw EIECIXIC 94RIIERH GVFlMVME919gIEG.@.WY - ry51 AYENVE Ilpf WI FIXIFNIAW1Fo11Xu VLtle MI M ry4l awa,4 0.19 .mVIME14 fI1RORNIAMS CCMPwXY ' YPIWsw 1ll1 WEBTLV30NNAY4MIF REd/xoR.CxIF4Wv.mn ��— �I a � VIGNT'MAP lRR)xPsleW eMM i¢FAIOXE VFAQCN CdPMINNY�MMB iPPP EPXRLPS RVULEPNm.eUxmxcu LEGAL pESCRIPl10N vgN1oXA cwFa4u P,ne IwWraale TYPICALSECNONSAPPHIRESpyEEr AssoNccumxiANOAc IV xTGHEprvov fla�wr wm Ni,muxrv�Nor TM41 BU WnH1EIN01181NEB 1MmMN6 9W BENNMUINO.6TnRgF WIFOWINA8 PEl11MPflENxoE➢ PLOCHCHEARy AVFIIVE H9P'M(I.P.WEbnFIMP4IXTIEnFFWE WTNE WIIMYPE6ROFA OF FONF/N1 GV1FWW49RM BVUCWMY. E%4FYIIHOTIEAFINgMT1EEWX110 F£ETMEIIECF. (WPI Wld)11 xng4n Xa Mrn LUNn9GIFXlp41NnT SIT DRM PL WMNER nLTA LGA4 CJYFORfM Yfmla931 [O[KPq N4W4A9fpMdEAgFYYPXIRE WIEETNW BRIIMVV W1E IYIIp)b46161 xron sgrooL nIbREYAgnI VFXM xmnscxooLON,wm r1 w.FIFMSIREET ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER -OXTnmJ.V16CWIN P11Q IWNPYM,1 IWIaPI-01 � nq TYPICAL BECIION-SRRTANY LANE TOPOGRAPHICMAPPING mwe DAW8ON 9EMV8Y¢iG,ls. fil6E G4NE0NORNE NLT4i,nuwPNu vnxPaPW ry%IbvWfe EAR111WORK SUMMARY ImauMRumTANe GEOTECHNICALCONSULTANT w. m xs 4RUNECFMWfM........................ fi.NPCr N� 1C585MRINGOEl�sI1P1P1.............. a04Y i E 1� 10NI HUMBOLTP111EEG eaR. Ins ALMIHne.uuFOW+u Wrm .V)NHIER GIf IMIEtMLAVNIME................... 4iYC i SRI.ImR� CdlfKf: MSREIIHTICXTIL IICE MI i qs� 9sITWeIeP '.vauxlEOF w,w Xu........................ bLv NeP44iPwP-RR.. LEGEND PLOP mrealoExcEIAWUtE v) ........ oI.Y XwGRurtNM•aVN! DEVELOPER '. /n1V91FDFni NAIFWLAVMARE.................... bLY ® RM,®WBIINL YFAlNY14YPF TNR NOD®rltp .PNS,SPP Cg49NN.IWR446MM NAtd a1W AIM11vAr nvFMlE.sNtEFx xwx4e PAlmrvETA41m Ln19 MienwxvEw4 cmrnNFat rwuFoxxu vWa Aglus4nxEFEuwr ..................................... aAb cY npL9eIlEA14A .P.nAe ®- Fm�aiaEruvxrmxgrM fLITACE w.TPnnEr RPazEww GXn99nFNPT' . ur �y. wK w]Mw4eweGRaxglBllw A4E LnFAXFA .i SF r Gq'11maRM11LL411YMUM GWNER kbEn X.gCFA N PATM fl nLT.V o4nXBFn rAFA .OID/a lBv.seaeb.Wesna.rMl py Hi1Rf4FPegte4YlTure WN�JiV.PLW RgPA6NIfn vEv¢gFmuWw .vsa AGleP.nwanml n RgnuE en�pRPRRh. UXCEVE1gPE0.NFA A1eb F 1CP4WM - IX fMEOF: ORMED FOOiP1UMMFA a Pb.bNk gLpGl LLC WIY4PMIOV nk9MwM 6gMM:MIPY FYJ911NG II.IF£0.VICUPMFA .xA]SPF 31N m 1W4WIE NNMNwYAVEf1VE. YDRfilEO11®fPTMxRCKpPq EW IMPERYNN)BIAFA •iP.W]BFISIPEETR.&OEwLLNHI R MR49I14 NPTAMFSI WIiORXIwNK P3PA RfRMMPEM'IOW.WFA v OSG CIXiTKT N..T0.�Y MHIFMW PulageeW mnawanw gQNBpN! nxR�XmuuSSWweonews .mXR,� CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SIRTf 10931 n�wGet�.waDxPVM Ic m" CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN '"��—- Tentative Tract No.18961 Raiff" a ,ill FAW �n I A CH= 21. -2Q131 4 illiqu • F- L y: "ro 2 Im X 4 77 41 V, 4� �-T=a ESI 11 Itr .. .... rA 5 Ba :�RN� �LM � SUBSIM CnY OFR MOCUCANONOA SUBTr 18881 A CONCEFRM GRADING PLAN Tentative Tract No.18961 2' 8 •:- d--,�.;:; a «-�c�s•:r a 0 w \ P 1°°"'-"-"�O1@ CRYOF IUNCHO CUCMIONW SUBTT 18Bet aum mwnOEwFHEllIUL cam_ OI'mHVIDav�.py,41c ®e [C4LNCENORADINO PUN Tentative Tract No.78961 �3 B I LOT 1sR R LOT 3 Ss m I W MY MPb 2 i� tlAPm . R R R I R � I LOT 7 LOT 6 LOT 5 is - cn T leP ? - is 21' waPm n�� 15' 15 13 HaP.N PE.W1LL\ ff T �n®n� A �' �""'�6 CRV OF MNCNO CUCM.tONW SIIBTf 1B8Bt cueraslunsummsioP ornsnsimwTcswn.ln �. PnusExoumrtomo g""_B ` GONCEPNAL GRADING PLAN ua oPwwsme[ m..y ", .. TenteSve Trect No.18967 •m4• 5 me X 7 -j-, IT 491 fi MT J1 <-5� ij IT It I 7q T, 10A �ti,mp. Tentative Tract No.18961 ........... ljM4 V 7m/ AIR NOW= r 4pWmr, Air 0�WW�8�1 ,......... lyill �mv��awvmaunawmrnaa I�VumNeJ7 O OFAANOHO CUGI Imm sums Bet m x -^„ _ r ,. ,. 1, � �,' �/ ,-�� ,( �•=-I �\i 1 � . BRITT�Mfl LAx ; fF•; I,I I. YI .. .. -'� I ,a �Vwgls ""'°'®"®"^°'^""'"�0'm CRYOF RRNCHO CUCAMONGA 9UBTT 18881 ornevmaxa.matm ®. ®•®-5 PMSREIATNE TO STREET GRADE °"• Tentative Tract No.16961 �7� 1 Brittany Ln. at Sapphire St. Neighborhood October/November;2014 ® We,the undersigned, are resident home owners in the neighborhood near Tentative Tract Map 18961. We would like to see this development integrated seamlessly into our community. To that effect we respectively request that this tract's grading be designed in such a way as to minimize the apparent height of the new development when viewed from the street and neighboring properties. There are many ways this could be accomplished. One way, for example, would be to condition that the building pad elevations be set no more than 18"-24" above the fronting street (as determined adequate for 100-year flood protection by a registered civil .engineer). Slopes to account for vertical changes in topography should be limited to side yards and rear yards. This would be consistent with the existing developments along and adjacent to Sapphire Street. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input on this proposed development. Sincerely, Name Address Signature M��•�. � Je�u�fER v�ut,CrQEw S(oSv S0PHIRE ST, v/ • R ft"(\) S P�"GES G 3 Iriffm IR• C a11�n a l:Q/r off4 etLe- -4x/1 e- 1 , Ak t•�- t,o H,� -c,t l�J - 70 -7 Tu r k ti � r4 P� LID) PJ vz� LTA 6 tr A no *.XHIBIT F Item D-58 Name' Address Signature Lo rl 41 Ln � ell C I l� ,s,737i� �6 _ a //'//u Srr Item D-59 Name Address Signature 2(40Aje 71- 670 1 I A c� 10 L,/,o � 1 Item D-60 RESOLUTION NO. 15-03 ® A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961,A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE ONE EXISTING 4.75-ACRE PARCEL INTO 7 PARCELS WITHIN THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY OF THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAPPHIRE STREET AND BRITTANY LANE AT 5615 SAPPHIRE STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1061-691-04. A. Recitals. 1. Hoike, LLC filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of November 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to an unspecified date. 3. On the 28th day of January 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 28, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies.to a 4.75-acre site, located at the northeast corner of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane, is rectangular in shape with approximately 320 feet of street frontage adjacent to Sapphire Street and a depth of 665 feet. This property has an existing single-family residence located in the northwest quadrant of the parcel. The land generally slopes from north to south and contains multiple trees that surround the residence as well as light ground vegetation throughout the.remainder of the property; and b. The property is located within the Very Low (VL) Residential Zoning District and is surrounded to the north, south, and west by existing half-acre single-family.development that • is also within the Very Low (VL) Residential Zoning District. The property is bordered to the east by Floyd M. Stork Elementary School; and Item D-61 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-03 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 2 c. The project involves the subdivision of a 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels for future residential development. The site is located within the Equestrian Overlay of the Very-Low (VL) Residential Zoning District, which requires subdivisions to have a maximum of 2 dwelling units per acre, an average lot size of 22,500 square feet and a-minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet. This project involves the creation of lots ranging in size from 21,780 to 40,000 square feet with an average lot size of 26,270 square feet. The project density is 1.67 dwelling units per acre. Per Section 17.36 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (RCDC), the VL Residential District also requires all lots to have a minimum depth of 200 feet, comer lots to have a minimum width of 100 feet, and interior lots to have a minimum width of 90 feet. This project complies with these requirements; and d. The project incorporates a 15-foot wide trail that is adjacent to all proposed lots along the north and east edges of the project area. The trail will have a vehicular access point at the northwest corner of the parcel, adjacent to Sapphire Street, and will connect to an existing trail located adjacent to the southeast corner of the parcel. In addition to the equestrian easement, a 4-foot wide drainage easement is provided in order to properly divert trail adjacent drainage flows. Development of the site will require street improvements along Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane as well as the creation of a new cul-de-sac (Brittany Court), which will run off of Brittany Lane and have a length of approximately 200 feet; and e. A neighborhood meeting for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961 was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties.within 660 feet of the site. The meeting was held in the multipurpose room at Floyd M. Stork Elementary School, located east of the proposed subdivision at 5646 Jasper Street on Wednesday, August 20, 2014. A second neighborhood meeting was held on Tuesday, October 21, 2014, at Floyd M. Stork Elementary School. All attending residents were made aware that the City's Technical, Trails Advisory, and Design Review Committees reviewed this project:The applicant also explained that the project civil engineer had worked with the City's Engineering Services Department to resolve concerns regarding drainage impacts. f. The Technical and Design Review Committees reviewed the project on September 2, 2014, and recommended approval of the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission. The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the project on October 8, 2014. The Committee recommended approval of the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission. g. This application was advertised as a public hearing on November 12, 2014, and January 28, 2015, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, an notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed project is to subdivide the site into 7 parcels, in accordance with the Equestrian Overlay of the Very-Low(VL) Residential Zoning District and Very Low General Plan land use designation; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. This project involves the creation of Item D-62 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-03 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOI KE, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 3 lots ranging in size from 21,780 to 40,000 square feet with an average lot size of 26,270 square feet. The project density is 1.67 dwelling units per acre. The VL Residential District also requires all lots to have a minimum depth of 200 feet, comer lots to have a minimum width of 100 feet, and interior lots to have a minimum width of 90 feet. This project complies with requirements specified in the Development Code; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed. The subdivision will comply with City standards including the minimum lot area and dimensions requirements. The project density is 1.67 dwelling units per acre, which is within the allowable maximum of 2 dwelling units per acre; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. Based on field visits and a Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis (RECA) prepared by MIG on May 1, 2014, the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The proposed project is to subdivide the site into 7 individual parcels. The subdivision project does not involve proposed development of the site at this time; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The subject property does not contain any easements that would affect the ability to • subdivide the site for future residential development. 4: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) because the project meets all of the requirements stated in the CEQA Guidelines. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan and zoning designation and regulations, which allows for a density of 2 dwelling units per acre. The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than 5 acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. In addition, based on field visits and a Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis (RECA) prepared by MIG on May 1, 2014, the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. Staff has also determined that approval of the" project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, hydrology/drainage or water quality. Furthermore, the site can be adequately served by all, required utilities and public services. With implementation of the standard conditions and all applicable regulatory requirements, such as the Migratory Bird Act, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment and prior to-any action being taken for the requested subdivision approval, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Item D-63 PLANNING COMMISSION. RESOLUTION NO. 15-03 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY' Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item D-64 Conditions of Approval 4oN� Community Development Department roject#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC -7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 1. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. Notice of Exemption -$50 2. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the. City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of- the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant ®f his obligations under this condition. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961 with applicable Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans -and/or Master- Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 6. Any proposed Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. • Printed:10/27/2014 www.QtyofRC.us Item D-65 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Plannina Department 7. The Covenants, Conditions., and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department that provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. Corral locations must meet proximity requirements and shall be consistent with Section 17.88 of the Development Code(Animal Regulations). 9. The site shall be developed and 'maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations. 10. Prior to recordation of the final map, the local feeder trail shall be installed. Local feeder trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that- equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in concept with Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 11. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris .from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required.by the Building and Safety Official. 12. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a fence and wall plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. Where comer side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. This material shall be consistent throughout the development. The walls on each lot shall be located interior to the equestrian trails and drainage easements. 13. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 14. Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department indicating that a bridge will be provided over the V-ditch where the drainage easement is adjacent 'to rear .and side yard access gates to allow each lot adequate access to the equestrian trails. 15. Any proposals for development within the project site shall require the review and approval of the City's Planning Department prior to construction. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/27/2014 Page 2 of 14 Item D-66 Project M SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. ROJECT.A. Plannina Department 16. Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department indicating that gate access will be provided to the rear of all lots adjoining the private equestrian trail. 17. Prior to recordation of the final map, all trail adjacent drainage easements must be installed and shall have a depth no greater than 6 inches.. 18. Approval is for the subdivision of one existing 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels within the Equestrian Overlay of the Very Low (VL) Residential Zoning District located at the northeast corner of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane at 5615 Sapphire Street-APN: 1061-691-04. 19. Prior to grading and/or construction, the applicant shall consult with a qualified biologist to determine the best means (such as trapping, barriers, relocation, etc.) for controlling the migration of animals onto neighboring properties while the site is being graded and homes are being constructed. The applicant shall then submit a report indicating which method(s) will be used, and implement them accordingly. B. En-gineerina Services Department 1. Per City Driveway Policy, driveways on Sapphire Street, a "Collector" street, shall have circular or 0mmerhead driveways. 2. Brittany Lane (including the new cul-de-sac) frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local ' Street" standards, as required, including curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, ADA access ramps, drive approaches, LED streetlights and street trees. a. Provide 5800 Lumens LED streetlights, as required. b. Provide traffic signing and striping, as required, including Stop Sign,Limit Line and Stop Legend. c. Revise existing street improvement plans Drawing Nos. 1317, as required by the City Engineer. d. Inlet to the curbside drain outlet shall- be--designed to prevent blockage with infrequent homeowner maintenance. Use Standard Drawing 107-B for 12-inch or larger private drainage facility. 3. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition. Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. • www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/27/2014 Page 3 of 14 Item D-67 Project M SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC- 7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. En-gineering Services Department 4. Lot 2 to maintain parkways on both Brittany Lane and Sapphire Street. If Lot 2 has a wall along Sapphire Street, it shall be at least 5 feet behind the sidewalk and provide access for homeowner maintenance of the Sapphire parkway. Note -on the public improvement plans that private landscaping and irrigation systems shall be installed in the parkways of Lot 2, prior to occupancy of said lot. 5. The new cul-de-sac shall intersect Brittany Lane radial to the existing centerline curve. The centerline radius on the new cul-de-sac shall be at least 300 feet, consistent with the Street Design Policy. 6. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior. to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 7. Street trees, 'a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 8. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Sapphire Street shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage, extending to the first pole off site (north and' south), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Sapphire Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street.- - If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 9. .A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 14 Printed:10/27/2014 Item D-68 Project M SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC -7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. ROJECT.B. Engineering Services Department 10. Sapphire Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector Street" standards, as required, including curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, ADA access ramp, cross gutter, drive approaches, LED streetlights and street trees. a. Provide drive approach for vehicular access to private local trail along the north tract boundary. Also, provide a curbside drain outlet(s) through the street right-of-way for private drainage facility(s) adjacent to trail. Where a downstream end of a trail meets a street, the trail shall be graded at no more than 0.5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the right-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of trail surface debris onto the sidewalk/street. Inlet to the curbside drain outlet shall be designed to prevent blockage with infrequent homeowner maintenance. b. City Standard Drawing No. 100-A calls for 4 inch A.C. over C.A.B. for a City Collector. c. Provide 5800 Lumens LED streetlights, as required. d. Provide traffic signing and striping, as required. e. Revise existing street improvement plans, Drawing No. 1713, as required by the City Engineer. 01. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Brittany Court Curb& Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Printed:10/27/2014 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 14 Item D-69 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Deaartment 12. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in. public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring.. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure• permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover. the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of.the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1012712014 Page 6 of 14 Item D-70 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map •ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 13. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Sapphire Street Botanical Name- Pistacia chinensis Common Name-Chinese Pistache Min. Grow Space- 5' Spacing -50' 0.C. Size- 15 gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils . report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, WS determined by the City inspector. All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 14. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other, interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. www.QtyofRC.us Printed:10/27/2014 Page 7 of 14. Item D-71 Project#: SUBTT18961 , Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 15. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1).". Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Brittany Lane including new cul-de-sac) Botanical Name- Platanus acerifolia Common Name- London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space-7' Spacing-40' 0.C. Size- 15 gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 16. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) . in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 17. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 18. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Sapphire Street Curb& Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees ADA Access Ramp www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 14 Printed:10/27/2014 Item D-72 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map • ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 19. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 20. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 21. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 30 total feet on Brittany Lane 30 total feet on Brittany Court 22. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Brittany Lane Curb& Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees 1DA Access Ramp 3.. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage 9 d ainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 24. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 25. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. _ ........... - .__..__....._ 26. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. Printed:10/27/2014 www-QtyofRC.us Page 9 of 14 Item D-73 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. ROJECT.B. Engineering Services Department 27. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source . of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council; except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal- proportion to. the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property 'exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval.. E. Grading Section 1. Prior to recordation of the final map the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm 'Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 2. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the recordation of the final map a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 3. If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration pits to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 4. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel--at- the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 5. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 6. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 7. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 14 Printed:10/27/2014 Item D-74 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map *LL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 8. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent . property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 9. In the equestrian trails: — Provide PVC fence, 4" thick DG surface, parallel drainage V ditch, bridge over V ditch where necessary for access corals, gates to corrals, S< 5% cross fall 2%, S>5% cross fall .4%. Water bars required at the spacing for the slopes shown respectively: 50' for 4% to 6%, 40' for 6% to 9%, 30' for 9% to 12%, 20' for 12%+. In the equestrian trails water bars shall also be placed at the top and bottom where the gradient of the trail changes, i.e. a steep downhill slope which will cause additional erosion to the trail. 10. If the storm water treatment infiltration pits are 10-feet or deeper below the surface of the ground the land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho. Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 11. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Elan"shall be recorded prior to the recordation of the final map. 12. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off-site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. 14. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit for any lot or lots, the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 15. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. • wvvw.CityofRC.us Printed:10/27/2014 Page 11 of 14 Item D-75 Project#: SUBTT18961 . Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Gradina Section 16. If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below. grade the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 17. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 18. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 19. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 20. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 21. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review,that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 22. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall, be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 23. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 24. Prior to recording the Final Map the applicant shall submit to the Building and Safety Department. a Grading and Drainage Plan for approval and a permit for the private cross-lot drainage and equestrian trails, and the applicant shall install the equestrian trail improvements and shall install the cross lot drainage devices adjacent to the equestrian trails and along the westerly property line of Lot 3. 25. Prior to the recording the Final Map the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of . Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorders Office. 26. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practice's. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 27. A soils report shall be .prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for. review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. www.Cityo1RC.us Printed:10/2712014 Page 12 of 14 Item D-76 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision. Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map OLL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 28. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 29. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 30. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 31. The final grading and drainage plan shall show "existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 32. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 33. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 34. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor Wn ll request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting ' shall be attended by the project er/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 35. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 36. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 37. Prior to the development of each lot, each lot shall have a topographic survey completed prior to submittal to the Planning Department for an entitlement on said lot(s). Printed:10/27/2014 www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 14 Item D-77 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC -7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 38. As future development occurs for each lot, should the applicant for a lot choose to use a different storm water quality treatment Best Management Practices (BMP) device other than what is described in the recorded Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan, the applicant's civil engineer of record shall prepare a priority water quality management plan for that lot to be included as an appendix to the recorded Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan. The civil engineer of record shall sign and seal- the document, and the document shall be signed by the owner of the property. www.C'rtyofRC.us Page 14 of 14 Printed:10/27/2014 Item D-78 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPART1VI Nr Date: January 28, 2015 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C;UCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner Subject: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207 - PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC - A request to construct 6 single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved 6-lot subdivision on 2.99 acres in the Low(L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 500 feet south of the Victoria Avenue. Related file:Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578.;APN: 022712133. On August 23, 2006, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Design Review DRC2014-00207 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. BACKGROUND: On August 23, 2006, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract 16578 for the subdivision of 2.99 acres into 6 single-family lots. The final map subsequently recorded in September 2014, the project site was sold, and the applicant has submitted a design review application for the project site. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan South:- Single-Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan East - Single-Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan West - Single-Family Residences; Very Low(VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South- Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Very Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The project site is located approximately 330 feet west of East Avenue, and situated around a cul-de-sac extension of the existing public street, Owens Court (Exhibit A). To the north, south, east, and west are existing single-family residences. The project site Item E-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00207—PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC January 28, 2015 Page 2 is currently vacant as the previous single-family home on-site has been demolished. Vegetation on-site consists of declining fruit trees, shrubs, small trees, and regrowth stumps. The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately 1,343 feet and 1,335 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project proposes the development of 6 single-family residences within a previously approved subdivision of 6 lots. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all subdivision improvements prior to the issuance of building permits for the residences. The lots are situated on the terminus of a cul-de-sac and range in size from 14,315 square feet(Lot 6) to 18,317 square feet (Lot 4) (Exhibit A and D). All lots are conventional in design allowing for conventional house plotting. The design and placement of the proposed homes complies with all Development Standards (Table 5-2) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The two lots on the western project boundary at the end of the cul-de-sac (Lots 3 and 4)will have one-story homes, while the 4 lots on the eastern end of the project site (Lots 1, 2, 5, and 6) will have two-story homes (Exhibit B). This mix.of single and two-story homes is consistent with Section 17.122.010 of the Development Code that requires a minimum of 25 percent of the proposed houses to be single-story. The single-story floor plans range in size from 4,067 to 4,110 square feet and the two-story floor plans range in size from 4,035 to 4,146 square feet. There are two distinct floor plans, plus a reverse of each building foot print, and four architectural styles (American Farmhouse, Craftsman, Bungalow, and Spanish)to provide substantial variety in project design (Exhibit C). This includes Lot 1 — American Farmhouse, Lot 2 — Craftsman, Lot 3 — Bungalow, Lot 4 — Craftsman, Lot 5-American Farmhouse, and Lot 6—Spanish. Each house will have a well-articulated footprint/floor plan and unit profile. The footprints and profiles of each house are varied and there is a substantial amount of movement in the wall plane and roof line. Projections such as prominent chimneys and dormers and a mix of hip and gable roofs will .provide additional interest in the profile of each house. There are also architectural details such as corbels, shutters, wall-mounted light fixtures, decorative trim around the windows, molding along the top of the stone veneer wainscots, and decorative garage and entry doors. Overall, the applicant has provided variety in architectural style, building design, unit placement, building massing, proportion and scale to distinguish each of the proposed styles from one another so that no two homes look alike. The project site contains a number of trees including declining fruit trees, privet shrubs, seedling trees; regrowth stumps (i.e., sucker growth), and foundation plantings around the location of the previously existing residence. Staff evaluated the project site for compliance with Section 17.16.080 of the Development Code relating to Tree Removal Permits, and determined that a Tree Removal Permit is not necessary. This is because fruit and nut trees are exempt, Privets are shrubs that are not protected, and regrowth stumps have already been excessively trimmed and are not sustainable. There are five (5) different trees on site two (2) Japanese Black Pine, one (1) Palo Verde, and two (2) Allepo Pines that were evaluated for their potential significance. A heritage tree is "any tree in excess of thirty feet (30') in height and having a single trunk diameter at breast height (DBH) of twenty inches (20") or more as measured four and a half feet (45)from ground level." None of these five (5)trees meet both Item E-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00207—PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC January 28, 2015 Page 3 height and the trunk size criteria to establish them as heritage trees requiring a Tree Removal Permit so they may be removed. B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held-at St. Clare of Assisi Episcopal Church on October 21, 2014 (Exhibits E). Several property owners from the surrounding community attended. Although none of them had any specific objections to the project, there were questions relating to the placement of single and two-story homes, the timing of development, as well as several questions regarding nearby projects. C. Design Review Committees: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger) reviewed the application on November 4, 2014 (Exhibit F). The Committee reviewed the project design and recommended minor architectural modifications to two elevations (for Lots 4 and 6). The applicant revised building elevations and submitted for additional Committee review. On December 2, 2014 the Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger) reviewed the revised project submittal on the Consent Calendar and recommended approval. D. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on August 23, 2006, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map 16578. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration ® is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of this project based on the following: • No substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; • No substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; • No new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; • No new or different mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts; and • There have been no substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Negative Declaration. All mitigation measures in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration will be implemented with the project. Item•E-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00207—PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC . January 28, 2015 Page 4 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the .Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received. Respectfully submitted, Candyce Burnett Planning Director CB:TG/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Elevation, Floor, and Roof Plans Exhibit D - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit E - Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheets (October 21, 2014) Exhibit F - Design Review Committee Action Comments, November 4,.2014 and December 2, 2014 Exhibit G - SUBTT16578 Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 06-65 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2014-00207 Item E=4 t� All t,gyp rl i ` �" Rroti e+Ri er �$��j � �,i �atf},fir"• .. � 4'.� E .. . � up a t , .,S.w.wc fir. � t� C` S MY •`+tl B'— :' ,.� ] _ � �� 4k��•y,y � __ � _—,}}fit"�' Wmdy�G" ave�Oc Pace i E eelnc BSke TiGaii - . � � p� m .r Z� VIA I———————-- V ArN.j a.2� ,ti� to lei ri it -------j NM 2 -14 iN 4rkiw OR. kz 4 to 111.2 ZZ rp -PI4 -12t-W m �17 - - NOT A F,'IkR.r L Lg.2 ------- D it or L SITE PLAN , Pi DATA 3 KEY NOTES 1:2 oioi� oeol o�o� oil logo �o�o EA5T ELEVATION �© SOUTH ELEVATION ®o eo ioo 'O D' —mnunnmonnLouu nnuuun ���1 ego[ GI01 ��_ aro aiam � s MI MOOOL'161- 101 r G � s44� t 7E g � 5LL33116N31V.1�RlLLI'F]IO'J N .V,l�ll5-sw61 WL w 5 )i t � d � n3 ❑ JE3 E ED i ❑ I ,e. it I I I II II z u d z d a K 0 0 J LL_ F a O J Item E-8 1 I I I I r I d I eo 1 GCd m I � I Y I FF 1 I +m 1 I 1 I j I I mamma I AYo�ef rwrt , , M W WR[l r ___________ ___ ____ I 1 fµ(114 I 1 F -� R _ Rtli�a oCSMe MYM6MOFA iA9101 A-1.2 LOT I - SECOND FLOOR PLAN (PLAN A) ^P E �--�-= ill I ----� I I I I I aav� I (z s 0 ikS; I I � ---- I nua»w u+m A-1.3 LOT I - ROOF PLAN (PLAN A) ^� I al 777' Ma — it r7'. r�7tt1�fA7V��li o� cIOI toxo NOW GOO A' �o10 .. 1.� ,ora o�o� ono1 - vo m7 + pill No Imp Lc E "ED] 96 II II I I II . FE-11 kuA Q z J Z Q J a a 0 0 J LL f- LL ry F 0 J Item E-12 �Y mm ; I � 1 I 1 Pill 1 ---( -- ® ----------------1 If�P1IJ fbLL , ; 1 3 ' I 04 1 I O � 2y2y2y 1 I � 1 1 j � 1 i I I I nw 1 vN I ; ; LMTMy I I 1 1 mM I I YAW MMd 1 I 1 mm I ,MwRGI. L ________- � I i BSAu j qW lW IBNR C w OBS Wl2 WARM04 WP A-2.2 LOT 2 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN (FLAN A-REVER5ED) Jill I I I I m I r I I Mnxs� I � I ffl I I e �i A J I I IT �o I I ,tea LI___ T G1D� A-2.3 LOT 2 — ROOF PLAN (PLAN A—REVERSED) LOT 3 — EAST ELEVATION(CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW) _ aw�N -` 1 $ m LOT 3 — NORTH ELEVATION (CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW) - 2 n w.nmva awe w. LOT 3 — SOUTH ELEVATION (CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW) uewa+e,we MESS,d—�� .,wmxu wr�,ae, oreeaew ,o.w.mw wraamraw, .� LOT 5 — WEST ELEVATION (CALIFORNIA BUNGALONU ` 4 waw E m� F RAI141b i OY/JgKA CD swam cl m ! VA R ppu § ! X n 0 Mw I P I i sclu ! MIW MOM1 v Ma f4tl1WN4 VS1bM[I GBIOP.E II/IWW 0.'MRI. G�D1 A-3.1 LOT 5 - FLOOR PLAN (PLAN B) �33 ---- ----- --------- -——— ------------ I I oewmms m,J'______ I I eei wc¢a y I I I I y 1 I r61 I � rw�.�'nue GSrewo CR6W�E' A-3.2 LOT 5 - ROOF PLAN (PLAN B) LOT 4 - EAST ELEVATION (CRAFTSMAPU 9 M „ r arrow EH m LOT 4 - NORTH ELEVATION(CRAFT5MAN) Z Bg� Yrr� / x EIN�PI LOT 4 - WE5T ELEVATION (CRAFTSMAN) 5 A-4.0 LOT 4 - SOUTH ELEVATION (CRAFTSMAN) `} O L_._. !� as s 9 _ i S ••.•• f � $ �nu.mti MIMIMK%1 p I - iNt MUNlW ua MYa MYgmNgtl� wrw A-4.1 LOT 4 - FLOOR PLAN (PLAN B-REVER5ED) `.> WL]PM Wb 3 - ------- --------- - g 3 I I 21 I i I , I � I i •�N¢«'o I I � arvxr.� I I I , I , I I I I I I I � 1 4 � I I I m... 1 I ee�waa 2 I I I I Y I 1 I I �m L—_ J W�luev NB6tW.E 2�Up A-42 LOT 4 - ROOF PLAN (PLAN B-REVERSED) 4` IFPI Ing im m M5T ELEVATION(AMERICAN FARMHOU5E) .`b`. 9 NORTH ELEVATION(AMERICAN FARMHOUSE) b. I •� 1' •1= 1' � Yr7 �___ --- © ® a - A-5.0 EAST ELEVATION(AMERICAN FARMHOUSE) ,:> 4 -SOUTH ELEVATION(AMERICAN FARMHOUSE) 2 [U --..s�uima,innswivsnoox n� �p ILE � I g Fc-:1 " / 31 \x/N 9 { ED / $ ® ( ___ I • � e( � O I I I -- a x Q d S J !L F LL N O J Item E-22 1 I I All -- m ----- ---- �; 0 — 1 � r6 I ( ,I g$ W � 1 I 1 1 1 p 1 9i I .m I I I I I ggLMNS ; mnu � •IM I 1 BV[�MII¢11 1 mnn j Wt11P2R 1 ------- ------------------ -------------- _ _ ____ ______ -- ----------------- _i J [rsarca rwnvom� rnvumxow A-5.2 LOT 5 - 5EGOND FLOOR PLAN (PLAN A) �I wcmo«aro X33 $ ilJill I I --- I I I I I T'�` I unav h I T I m ggi I I FL ------ I Cir �n)I g . mx.oewe . ..M ce,aa�� aeaw.i . wuoacvaw A-5.3 LOT 5 - ROOF PLAN (PLAN A) a` ........................................................ fie; E€� ��...I„�■..a ,,.,o�,_, �„o�,,`,,.�o�._ s�;aoior-9:�:¢�I�- --�j:: ¢::II��■■111 ■o Illl�pllll 'llll�pllll Illl�pllll I �� IIII,p�o111111 �o�o •■ —� .......... ..................... .. Lnnaluun Lnnnlnminnnlnuu �� _I���„� _ 111111jpjpllllllIlllll1ojplllill Illlwlllll,! � ��,� 11 Flfllv >, «' IIII IIII ' IIII 1111 IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII 111111 1111 111111 111111 o� � o�o�.., . 00 MIEN o�o�=' ..,moo I” ..—�o�a I,o�a Illllllolollllll M L Illllolollll loloI to ilp Ic1 as GIGI - � � GIGI ” oltoi DI GIII DI 111111 111111, Jill n ��y{r� LIIY CF � p/AjG Pffi1 m 31 F p it < m , I I n t® ❑ °� i � \x/ � mm II s �`o r� L Y ❑ ❑ ❑ LSI 9 afAu,glll. M(W waalbl Z � � tM.11W qDW FxOOeMM� A-6.1 LOT 6 — FIRST FLOOR PLAN (PLAN A—REVERSED) T o` a � D �; 1 � [YLIm®3L O 614NKWA ----------------- J W1L 1 1 -----1 m 1 N y I I--- ------------------t ----------- - I I I I [• e 1 mm 1 RI!/ I I I 1WPMp I I 1 HPY lgll I I d I 1 1p10.NA 41. I re an I vfAUac' Fro w R-6.2 LOT b - 5EGOND FLOOR PLAN (PLAN A-REVER5ED) VC MEE= WiMMM w :¢ i6 I I7 I 7 I , I I I I I I , I I � I I � I I r I I _J CM I F rA , I I I I � a Q N... Z 4 J a z 4 J a LL 0 O K m O J Item E-28 `` ] 3 APl<1 227 121-38 IA?N �D 1 1 '39 I'`.APN 227 121, 40 APA,Z29-127y/44 , dPN: 18 W i I;�^.:,.z�.... Y ( x. s.v�iu• '� �.� o�'?.nm. _ti4t _ 2`..s. I { .,, i{ i\ �' c \ 71i`. � IE � ..- y �p � 27 _ �i z L -"" _ 1 (" l Y{�I1l�I - � , r� I ,' 1 1S1 � �j' ` - 1'� 2 ■■ayy �(R�+� v i o�2w, �� + Eo�Ac ve$ 1,cy •s 'I. -ANO-T.-A P�,�} y; t�tl��•I'''"=�-i � �sAPN 2{�/-7,-1 34/ 1145$$ Tj _- -a! 1-rte J m NOT A Pkv '.- I' ; ,' { E� ;1 °I 1 APN Q2B1117-,2, 3e 1� }j ��' y -- lIzz _ =30 EOT 21'- .'I'-Z-- � ', SCALE: t' IL r9 IMM T'N _---------�" r '� ws70 I -- --- * 14 / h'. P�� .,i � \� {i�11 °` ` ii-:�. `�,�-��� �. � i i_ i la __ _ U � __ �+l•_<hvau________ �n ,. ` LOT \ ill LOT%3'--- 217-,.2,_32 11.;21 9's ifs 1.d ;----; , �����, :\It II� . '-�•`��.�'--- ,. \II .-"'-""-- �f r j� j 1 '. ._ .`i'aawo`nw' More: � � �-- (LBB E0.L'M EIENLHMARK� L� :'�etm�nsm�a ww.R EENJI°V.RK M°�YK'69 v¢mvw VIGINIT°l' MAP G-2 O K-A wall ea a 1161=11 > L IP q 10 F&T mill I 17T— III sill ml I CPRTOUSASLSMNS CONCH GRADING FOR TRACT M 10575 cr A A L 14L 2,3 L, TO I ck- 0/la, ---------- ------------ EXHIBIT E Item E-31 YOU ARE INVITED TO ATTEND A PRESENTATION OF THE SIX NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES BEING PROPOSED FOR TRACT MAP 16578, 3.02 acres LOCATED AT 6956 East Ave. in Rancho Cucamonga t L r � a t Rendering of lot 4 Single story house Presented by Plaza Developments East Ave. LLC George Taunton Member 714) 990-0267 P.O. Box 9026 Brea, California 92822 When: Tuesday, October 21 at 6:00 PM Where: St. Clare of Assisi Episcopal Church 6563 East Avenue, Rancho Cucomonga Item E-32 Tract 16578 6956 East Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga 91739 Victoria North T E o; °epi a " s o ; , a3 ` t _ a 5 a m z tai 0 w Q Z A 4. v _- C � I _ T I �rR RYfIWCot®o O Item E-33 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. TOM GRAHN November 4, 2014 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207 — PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC — A design review of six single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved 6-lot subdivision on 2.99 acres within the Low(L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 500 feet south of the Victoria Avenue - APN: 0227-121-33. Related case: Tentative Tract.Map SUBTT16578. Design Parameters: On July 12, 2006, the Planning Commission approved SUBTT16578 for the subdivision of 2.99 acres into 6 lots and Development Review DRC2004-01198 for the design of six single-family homes. SUBTT16578 has since recorded, while DRC2004701198 has expired. Subsequent to that approval, the property was acquired by the current applicant who submitted new architecture for the project site. The project proposes the development of six single-family residences on a cul-de-sac with single-story and two-story floor plans. The single-story floor plans range in size from 4,067 to 4,110 square feet, and the two-story floor plans range in size from 4,035 to 4,146 square feet. The four most easterly lots, mid subdivision and adjacent to the eastern project boundary.(Lots 1, 2, 5, and 6) will be two-story, while the two lots on the western project boundary (Lots 3 and 4) • will be single-story. The design and placement of the proposed homes meets all Basic Development Standards (Table 5-2) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. There are two distinct floor plans, plus a reverse of each building foot print, and four architectural styles (American Fa_ rmhouse, Craftsman, 'Bungalow, and Spanish) to provide substantial variety in project design. Overall, the applicant has provide variety in architectural style, building design, unit placement, building massing, proportion and scale; however, various architectural features should be included to further distinguish each of the proposed styles from one another. Staff Comments: Major Issues: The following design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Revise the project architecture to provide additional architectural features to distinguish the proposed styles from one another. Suggestions include the expanded use of accent materials (i.e., siding, shutters, fire place/chimney, size of wainscot, etc.) to provide the variety of project design. 2. As an example, the Lot 5 — American Farmhouse design should be further distinguished from the Lot 6 — Spanish Villa design. These lots are adjacent and a reverse footprint of each other,.but because of their proximity to each other, the use and placement of various architectural features makes them look too similar. Modifications could include variety in • the placement of brick/stone wainscots, variety in the size of porch and porch columns, additional variety in the size of window trim, and variety in the size and placement of corbels. EXHIBIT F Item E-34 DRC AGENDA DRC 2014-00207 — PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVENUE, LLC November 4, 2014 Page 2 3. Similar architectural revisions should be done between the side by side placement of the proposed houses on Lot 1 —American Farmhouse and Lot 2 — California Bungalow, and between Lot 3—California Bungalow and Lot 4—Craftsman. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:. 1. There are no secondary design issues. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the applicant revise the project architecture and return to the Design Review Committee for review and approval of Development Review DRC2014-00207. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed the proposed architecture and recommended the following modifications: 1. Lot 4—Craftsman elevation. Add river rock to the two front columns and increase the size of the wood column at the top, and add additional corbels along the roof line. 2. Lot 6 — Spanish Villa elevation. Add additional decorative elements at the top of the front window and add an arch over the top of the window on the north elevation. ...Staff Planner. Tom Grahn Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Item E=35 • THE CITY OF RANCHO C A UC MONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA CtICHOG DECEMBER 2, 2014 7:00 RM. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. GALT.TO ORDER ACTION Roll Call 7.00 P.M. II: • Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett_ Donald Granger X Alternates: Ray Wimberly_ Frances Howdyshell_ Lou Munoz III:. PROJECT CONSENT ITEMS, A. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207 - PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST A. The Committee AVE LLC -A design review of six single-family residences in conjunction reviewed the revised with a previously approved 6-lot subdivision on 2.99 acres within the Low architecture for the (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west project and side of East Avenue, approximately 500 feet south of the Victoria Avenue- recommended approval. APN: 0227-121-33. Related case: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. IV.- PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is fmited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the protect proposal. ,The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. • 1 of 2 Item E-36 • RESOLUTION NO. 06-65 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578, ON 2.99 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED WEST OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF VICTORIA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 0227-121-33 AND 37. A. Recitals. 1. Lily Kaut filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578;as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2: On the 12th day of July 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing. 3. The applicant withdrew their related application for Design Review DRC2004-01198 on July 26, 2006. 4. On the 23rd day of August 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on July 12,2006, and August 23,2006,including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street, with a street frontage of approximately 330 feet and lot depth of 331 feet and is presently vacant land; and b. The property to the north, south, and west of the subject site are single-family homes; the property to the east is vacant; and C. The application contemplates the subdivision of land into 6 lots that meet or exceed the standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. EXHIBIT G Item E-37 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578— LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the . above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That Tentative Tract Map. SUBTT16578 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed;and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record,for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study,City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitioation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff'provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures,there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. Item E-38 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-65 ` TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578—LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 3 • d. Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations,Section 753.5,the Planning Commission finds,based on the Initial Study,the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole,that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753.5(Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753.5.) e. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based, is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3 and 4 above,this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below . and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The applicant shall provide written permission from the adjacent property owners for any off-site grading prior to issuance of Grading Permits. Engineering Department 1) Street "A" shall be improved in accordance with City "Local Street" standards including curb and gutters, a.c. pavement, street lights,' street trees, sidewalk, drive approaches, traffic signs and stripings: • The cul-de-sac bulb shall be per City Standard 111. • The developer shall make a good faith effort to negotiate with owners of APNs: 0227-121-34 and 0227-121-36 regarding privately maintained landscaping and irrigation along their side yards on Street "A." Improvements are to be installed to the street curb. Plans for these areas will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department,with exception to street trees. Ifthe owners are not willing to negotiate said improvements, install rockscape on the parkway, per City Standards. • Provide drive approaches for the existing"not-a-part"residences to Street"A." • The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the amount for installation of permanent public improvements from future development as it occurs on either • side of the street fronting APNs: 0227-121-34 and 0227-121-36. Item E-39 PLANNING COMMISSIONASOLUTiON NO. 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578—LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 4 If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall . terminate. 2) The developer shall make a good faith effort to negotiate with owners of APNs: 0227-121-34 and 0227-121-36 an exchange of corner cutoffs dedications on East Avenue for sidewalks and curb returns on both comers. • Remove or relocate the existing power pole located at the northwest comer of East Avenue and Street'A." 3) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical)on the project side of Street .'A"shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site most westerly on Street'A'to the first pole off-site Street"A"on East Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. All services crossing Street 'A' shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted amount for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on either side of the street fronting APNs: 0227-121-34 and 0227-121-36. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City,all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 4) _ Development within Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 8 is required to install master plan storm drains and interim basins. Interim Basin No.5 and the storm drain in East Avenue were both constructed by Tract 15912, south of the subject tract. - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 can satisfy its condition to install storm drains through the payment of fees. However,those fees do not cover the interim basin. The developer of Tract 15912 is eligible to request reimbursement for the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities(outlet,etc.). They must request said reimbursement within 6 months of the public storm drain facilities being accepted by the City. Therefore,this development will need to deposit $5,000 per gross acre in Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 with the City. for-_.the .purpose. of reimbursing .the .. developer of Tract 15912. If reimbursement is not requested within 6 months of public improvement acceptance, the deposit will be returned to developer of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. 5) An in-lieu fee as reimbursement for the previously undergrounded overhead utilities(telecommunications and electrical,except the 66 KV electrical)on the opposite side of East Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of Building Permits. The amount shall be one-half of the actual cost of undergrounding of said utilities fronting East Avenue 66-foot frontage. The reimbursement fee is unavailable at this time, since Tract 16189 is still under construction. I i Item E-40 PLANNING COMMISSION J, ESOLUTION NO. 06-65 ' TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578— LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 5 6) Reimburse adjacent developers for oversizing of interim drainage facilities. 7) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with the application for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete. Include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for technical plan check. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be • utilized,or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. . 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • _ Reestablishground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts . of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Item E-41 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578— LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 6 6 Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occur as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction-Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shutoff equipment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Item E-42 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-65 '` ' TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578—LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 7 • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments,using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric-... resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of.the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for - documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository(i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils ® 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce Fine Particulate Item E-43 PLANNING COMMIS%' SOLUTION NO. 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578—LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 8 Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all-inactive construction areas that remain inactive for. 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Wafer Ouality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits,the permit applicant shall submit to.Building Official for approval,Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented-for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground . disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction,--temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Item E-44 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-65 Y TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578—LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 9 • Post-Construction Activities 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc. dated December 10, 2004, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP),including a project descriptionand identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. • 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits,applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. -Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Prior to issuance of Grading and Building Permits, the applicant shall submit an acoustical study prepared by licensed acoustical engineer analyzing traffic noise impacts upon the project site and..making_... _. recommendations for mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards. 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly • noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may required by the Building Item E-45 PLANNING COMMISSIONI-' SOLUTION NO. 06-65 3N - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578— LILY KAUT August 23,2006 _ Page 10 Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m._and 6:30_a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a.national holiday. Additionally,if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 106 daily trips(counting both to and from the construction site),then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2006. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: V"" Pam St art, Chairman ATTEST: �• J es R.Troyer, Secreta I, James R.Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 2006, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES:. .. ..:.COMMISSIONERS: McPHAIL, MUNOZ; STEWART NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS Item E-46 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 and DRC2004-01198 This Mitigation Monitoring Program(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the *(Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Report)for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary.This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring • progresses, changes to compliance *procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants'fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA.91730 . Item E-47 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBT716578 AND DRC2004-01198 August 23, 2006 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date., the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form: After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures.The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented: 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division-shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the Citys MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the-issuance of building permits. Item E-48 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART 111) Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 and Development Review DRC2004-01198 Applicant: Lily Kaut Initial Study Prepared by: Emily Cameron, Associate'Planner Date: May 31, 2006 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring, Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Cornpliance All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of.Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall .ensure that all - construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall. be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Review of Plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City f denoting the proposed schedule and projected m equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide .,L evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: ■ Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. _r Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 1 of 8 i Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Cornpliance ■ Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. ■ Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public Construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph)in accordance with Construction Rule 403 requirements. t" Maintain a minimum 24-inch.freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 3' T haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction o suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A/C 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Construction Regional Water Quality Control Board[RWQCB])daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Chemical soil-stabilizers' (approved by SCAQMD and BO C. During A/C 4 'RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive:construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize,electric or clean BO C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor rshall ensure that BO C Review of Plans . A/C: 2/4 construction,grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C Review of Plans A 4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating,air conditioning,appliances,and water heaters. 2 -%f8 Mitigation .. . Monitoring • of •• of -■ Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance All residential and commercial structures shall be CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/3 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. ..........-, vis Nam " ?„�,`��. y .. Vol.: t s em+ If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities and to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: ■ .Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant: modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a m theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage. Report ■ Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. ■ Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report,with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 3 of 8 Mitigation Measures Noi Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implernenting Action •r Monitoring Frequency Verification • D, Non-Corripliance If any paleontological resource(i.e.plant or animal fossil) CP B Review of A/D 4 are encountered before or during grading,.the developer Report shall retain a qualified. paleontologist to conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate.Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include,but not be limited to,the following measures: ■ Assign a paleontological monitor, ;trained and CP B Review of A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the `,site full-time during the Interval of earth-disturbing activities. ■ Should fossils be found within an area,being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert rp construction and notify the monitor'.of the find. N Prepare,identify,and curate all recovered fossils for CP D Review of D 3 documentation-in the summary report and transfer.to Report an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). ■ Submit a summary .report to City. of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a • "F copy of the 'report to San Bernardino County ` Museum. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Construction RWOCB)daily to reduce PMI()emissions,in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. ,I 4nf8 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for •Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-ComplianceE • 'Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended, when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions Construction from the site during such episodes. Chemical.soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO/CE C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. OWN MOM, W2 My il,: 11tY.'s',. i"1•. f'f.-yi1,:Y [:� �.Y�1�:. ,+.... - - 3Y. F' 1. - 12 + M1 rl Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall BO/CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 be integrated into the design of the project where During appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize Construction runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, m pre-cast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions,runoff spreaders,seepage pits,and recharge basins. Prior to issuance of grading permits,the permit applicant BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 5of8 Mitigation Measures Noponsible • • • Timing of •o of •• Sanctions for Im • • • oMonitoring • e tNon-Compliance An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2%4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion,of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California,and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be Included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent ' discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 m cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and A after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan shall be prepared prior to submittal of Building and Safety Division, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Landscaping plans shall include 'provisions for BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years,shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 6of8 Nis= i r*Tq . Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of. a Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained(i.e.,a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the mNPDES'General Construction Permit. C, Prior to issuance of grading and building permits, the CP/BO B Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit an acoustical study prepared by and during licensed acoustical engineer analyzing traffic noise inspection impacts upon the .project site and making recommendations for mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards. Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A/C 2/4 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7 of 8 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of •e of -• Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Cornpliance Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A/C 2/4 standards specified in Development Code .Section Construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line.. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly . noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels 'exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall'immediately notify the Building Official. If noise.levels'exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with;above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A 4 as possible in the first phase. Construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place'between the CP C During A 4 hours of 5:00 P.M. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, Construction 3 including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a T national holiday. Additionally, if heavyy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site),then the developer shall prepare .a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations CDD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP-City Planner or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO-Building-Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds FC-Fire Chief or designee 6-Revoke CUP 7-Citation Anf8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT S TANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 SUBJECT: SIX SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ONLY APPLICANT: LILY KAUT LOCATION: EAST AVENUE/SOUTH OF VICTORIA ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, .(909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Comoletlon Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,officers,or employees,because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date'of the approval. C. Site Development - 1. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building,etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 2. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. esc-11-05 1 I:\PLANNINGTINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res&Stf Rpt\SUBTT16578Std Cond 8-23.doc Item E-57 ' Project No.SUBTT16578 Completion Date 3. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. D. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures,including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit,or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $ aQ�nrior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used bythe Cityto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to,complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) E. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets,detached)including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules,and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans,including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system_ location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning;and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e.,SUBTT#,SUBTPM#,DRC#)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy-conservation calculations,and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and"wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4: Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. F. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., SUBTT16578). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes,ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time. of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for 2 I:\PLANNINGTINAL\PLNGCOMIM2006 Res&Stf Rpt\SU13TT16578Std Cond 8-23.doc Item E-58 Project No.SUBTT16s78 Completion Date availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance.and applicable handouts. ® 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include,but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance.. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday,with no construction on Sunday or holidays. G. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. H. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. • 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan.check... . 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of.building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared,stamped,and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. 6. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading,no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 3 1APLANNINGTINAUPLNGCOMM2006 Res&Stf Rpt1SUBTT16578Std Cond 8-23.doc Item E-59 Project No.SUBTT16578 Completion Date 2. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 3. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. J. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos,landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street.improvements shall include,but are not limited to,curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches,sidewalks,street lights, and street trees, 2. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No.88-557,no person shall make connections from a source of energy,fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes -and for which a permit is required unless,in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except:that in developments containing more than one building or unit,the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by. these conditions of approval of development. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb& ALC. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt I walk Appr. Lights I Trees Trail Island Trail Other STREET "A" X I X Ix I X I X I X 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans,including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be. paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping,marking,traffic signing,street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR,or any other locations approved by the City Engineer 4 1:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGC01V1M\2006 Res&Stf Rpt\SUBTT16578Std Cond 8-23.doc Item E-60 Project No.SUBTT16578 Completion Date Notes: • 1) Pull boxes shall be No.6 at intersections and No.5 along streets,a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _J_/ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction.to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / accordance with the Citys street tree program. 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet---(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required,tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. • The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information,contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Cty. STREET"A" CERSIS CANADENSIS EASTERN ROSEBUD 5' 25'O.C. 15GAL Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting,an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department, 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. K. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. L. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. • 5 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res&Stf Rpt\SUBTT16578Std Cond 8-23.doc Item E-61 E Project No.SUB7r16578 Completion Date 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface.drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. M. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water,gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility. Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD),Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and- other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final tract map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. N. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline,Secondary Regional,and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City,covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation,prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits,a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Programa The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 6 1APLANNINGTINALTLNGCOMM12006 Res&Stf Rpt\SUB7'r16578Std Cond 8-23.doc Item E-62 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS March 29, 2006 Kaut Tract (6) SFR West side of East Ave south of Victoria SUB1716578 & DRC2004-01198 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: L At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. ii. At intersections. iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. V. A minimum of forty-feet (40')from any building. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is 2,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20- pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. t4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. Item E-63 FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fre District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when .submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the$92 review fee. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS— Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (DomestiefFire) Systems: .The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fre District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 2. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fre Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION— Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire_access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be.visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. Item 122-64 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality/Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 and Development Review DRC2004-01198 Public Review Period Closes: July 12, 2006 Project Name: Project Applicant: Lily Kaut Project Location(also see attached map): Located at 6956 East Avenue-APN:0227-121-33 and 37. Project Description: A request to subdivide 2.99 acres of land into 6 single-family lots and the review of site plans and elevations for 6 single-family homes in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre). FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is ® proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study indicates that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted;the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909)477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. August 23, 2006 Date of Determination Poepit Item E-65 • RESOLUTION NO. 15-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT 6 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION (TENTATIVE TRACT 16578) WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET SOUTH OF VICTORIA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0227-121-33. A. Recitals. 1. Plaza Developments East Avenue filed an application for Design Review DRC2014- 00207, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. Section 17.20.070 of the Development Code requires Planning Commission review of residential projects with 5 or more dwellings. 3. On the 28th day of January 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 28, 2015,-including written and oral staff reports,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a site located at the western terminus of Owens Court, west of East Avenue and -so u-th-of Victoria Avenue. The project site is approximately 331 feet deep (east to west) and 330 feet(north to south)with an overall area of approximately 2.99 acres; and b. To the north, south, east, and west of the project site are existing residences; and C. The project proposes the construction of 6 single-family residence on each lot of a 6-lot subdivision with access onto a future public street (Related file: Tentative Tract Map • SUBTT16578) that was previously approved by the Planning Commission on August 23, 2006 and subsequently recorded on September 9, 2014; and Item E-66 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-04 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207—PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC January 28, 2015 Page 2 d. The applicant proposes two (2) distinct footprints— Plans 1 and 2—and reverse footprints of each for a total of four (4) footprints. The number of available footprints complies with Figure 5-45 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and e. Plan A on Lots. 1, 2, 5, and 6 will be two-story residences, and Plan B on Lots 3 and 4 will be one-story residences. The mix of one- and two-story homes is consistent Development Code Development Code Section 17.122.010(A)(1)(a), which requires that at least twenty-five percent (25%) of all single-family. detached units in any single-family residential development consisting of four(4) or more units to be single-story units; and f. The project will comply.with Section 5.42.606 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan that requires that 50 percent of the garages to be oriented or situated in a manner that minimizes the visual presence of the garage. A total of 4 residences will have side facing garage doors; and g. The proposed houses comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The architecture of each house is consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and h. The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the proposed project on December 2, 2014. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: -a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and.the purposes of.the district in which the site is located. The construction of 6 units is consistent with the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, which permits the development of single-family homes at a density of 2 to 4 dwelling units per acre and the underlying General Plan designation is Low.Residential; and b. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and C. The proposed development, together with.the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public healthy safety-or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site will be developed in accordance with the previously - approved subdivision map to support new residences; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community; and 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on August.23, 2006 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. Pursuant to CEQA Item E-67 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-04 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207—PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC January 28, 2015 Page 3 Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation.measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Design Review DRC2014-00207, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. SUBTT16578 provided for the subdivision of 2.99 acres into 6 lots. Design Review DRC2014-00207 provides for the design review of the 6 homes within that approved subdivision. The Planning Commission further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Design Review DRC2014-00207. • 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. -The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and. regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: Item E-68 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO: 15-04 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207—PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC January 28, 2015 Page 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item E-69 Conditions of Approval PHOUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2014-00207 Project Name: Location'. -022712133-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. Approval is for the development of 6 single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved 6-lot subdivision of approximately 2.99 acres within the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west. side of East Avenue, .approximately 500 feet south of the Victoria Avenue-APN: 022712133. 2. The development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Low(L) Residential District as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. SA detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in e case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. - - 5. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 6. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at-- its own expense in the- defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 7. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 15**, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations associated with SUBTT16578 shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheets are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 8. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or the approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. • Printed:1/15/2015 www.CityofRC.us Item E-70 Project#: DRC2014-00207 Project Name: Location: -022712133-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 9. Model homes shall require the review of a separate Temporary Use Permit (Model Home) and fee prior to the submittal of documents for plan check and construction. Note: Parking in the street will not be permitted for this purpose. A temporary off-street parking area that complies with all applicable parking requirements will be required and must be shown on the plans for this permit. 10. All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 (including all Mitigation Measures identified in the associated Mitigated Negative Declaration)shall apply. 11. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 12. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 13. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 14. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire . Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and . Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings.. shall ..be... inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 15. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits(such as grading, building, etc.). 16. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 17. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. Return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 18. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. 19. The development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Low(L) Residential District as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 20. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 8 Printed:1/15/2015 Item E-71 Project#: DRC2014-00207 Project Name: Location: - 022712133-0000 eroject Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 1. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 06-65 approving Tentative Tract Map 16578 shall apply. C. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit 1.- All structures will be required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. Fire hydrants shall be installed per RCFPD Standard 5-10. D. Building and Safety Services Department 1. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); QElectrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service ntrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and. Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Annexation. of the parcel: Annexation of the parcel into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or Building Permits. 6. The house, garage and any other structures as required must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. - 7. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive requirements. 8. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 9. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 10. Construction activity shall occur in accordance with the standards as stated in Chapter 17.66.050 ep-4 of the Development Code. Printed:1/15/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 6 Item E-72 Project#: DRC2614-00207 ' Project Name: Location: -022712133-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: D. Building and Safety Services Deaartment 11. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 12. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 13. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all . other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. E. Grading Section 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for-existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined---cut--and -fill.- The Grading- and Drainage Plan shall- be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer.. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review,that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 6 Printed:1/15/2015 Item E-73 Project#: DRC2014-00207 Project Name: Location: -022712133-0000 Oroject Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Gradina Section 9. It shall be the responsibilityof the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on . property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 12. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 13. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 14. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by She Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 15. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 16. A Grading Bond will- be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 17. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 18. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 19. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 20. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 21. The precise grading and drainage plan shall. follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed:1/15/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 6 Item E-74 Project#: DRC2014-00207 Project Name: , Location: -022712133-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 22. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, ' the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the ' City of Rancho Cucamonga Building- and - Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading .inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading, contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 23. Prior to the issuance of .the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 24. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions 'of Approval. 25. Reciprocal.- access ,easements for .storm water treatment devices within the public right-of-way and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording, of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Page s of s Printed:1/15/2015 Item E-75 S'T'AFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: January 28, 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2014-00915 - AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC (AMC) - A request to establish alcoholic beverage sales (Type 47 - On-Sale General for Bona Fide Public Eating Place) in conjunction with the existing Victoria Gardens AMC 12 Movie Theater, in the Regional Center (RC) District of the Victoria Planned Community, located at 12600 North Mainstreet; APN: 109053105. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use-Permit DRC2014-00915 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Parking lot; Regional Center(RC) District, Victoria Community Plan • South _ Existing commercial; Regional Center(RC) District, Victoria Community Plan East Parking lot; Regional Center (RC) District, Victoria Community Plan West - Existing commercial; Regional Center(RC) District, Victoria Community Plan B. General Plan Designations: Project Site Mixed Use North - Mixed Use South - Mixed Use East - Mixed Use West - Mixed Use C. Site Characteristics: Victoria Gardens is a 147-acre, 1.5 million square foot open air mall located north of Foothill Boulevard and west of the 15-Freeway (Exhibit A). The American Multi- Cinema (AMC) 12 Theater is located in the area generally surrounded by Cultural Center Drive to the north, North Mainstreet to the south, Eden Street to the east, and Kew Street to the west (Exhibit B). The AMC 12 Theater encompasses approximately 61,283 square feet and features 2,190 seats distributed among 12 auditoriums. In addition to the AMC Theater,Victoria Gardens offers over 175 retail shops and restaurants, including such stores as Macy's, JCPenney,Apple, H&M, Williams-Sonoma, as well as restaurants such as Lucille's Smokehouse, The Yard House, The Cheesecake Factory, and many other retail and dining establishments. ANALYSIS: & General: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to establish alcoholic beverage • sales with a Type 47 Alcoholic Beverage Control License (On-Sale General for Bona-Fide Public Eating Place) in conjunction with the existing AMC 12 Theater, located at 12600 North Item F-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00915—AMC THEATER (MACGUFFIN'S BAR & LOUNGE) January 28, 2015 Page Mainstreet, within the Regional Center(RC) District of the Victoria Community Plan (Exhibit B). In an effort to attract a broader range of the movie-going audience, the AMC chain has begun offering alcoholic beverages in conjunction with a patron's movie going experience at several other locations. AMC is proposing to upgrade the existing concession area to provide expanded food and non- alcoholic beverage options. The sale of alcohol (beer, wine, and hard liquor) will be incidental to existing food sales and will allow for the consumption of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with expanded food operations. Consistent with the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) requirements, food shall be offered and available for purchase at all times while alcoholic beverages are being sold. .The AMC food menu includes appetizer items, hot dogs, pizza, as well as popcom and candy. Alcoholic, beverage sales will be separated from the movie theater food and non-alcoholic beverage concession area. An area known as"MacGuffins Bar& Lounge"will be located apart from the general concession area (Exhibits C & D) in an area currently containing video arcade games, where adult moviegoers with proper identification will be able to order alcoholic drinks (wine, beer, and spirits). There are no additional seats in the MacGuffins area; patrons will take their purchased food'and drinks to their seats in the auditoriums. Hours of alcohol sales will run from 10:30 a.m. to 12:30 a.m. for sales and 10:30 a.m. to 1:30 a.m. for consumption, daily, although AMC may choose to further reduce the hours of alcoholic beverage sales at their discretion. As of application submittal, there were 65 AMC locations that include a MacGuffins. All MacGuffins serve alcohol; two are limited to the sale of beer and wine only. B. Land Use Compatibility: The intent of a CUP is to ensure that the proposed use will be operated in a manner consistent with local regulations and to ensure that the use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to other uses, properties, or improvements in the vicinity. The approval of a CUP requires the making of certain findings, which show that the proposed use is consistent with all City development standards, land uses and applicable requirements. A use proposed through a CUP must be compatible with other surrounding uses; therefore, the approval of a CUP is discretionary. The 2012 Development Code update established the Planning Director as the approving authority for Conditional Use Permits; however, the Planning Director has referred this Conditional Use Permit to the Planning Commission for review and action. The project site, MacGuffins specifically, will be located inside the AMC 12 Theater and there are no exterior modifications or improvements proposed, so-no physical improvements will impact adjacent business operations. There are currently several restaurants in Victoria Gardens serving alcohol in the immediate vicinity of the theater. There is nothing to prevent a patron from going to a restaurant, consuming an alcoholic beverage, and walking to the AMC Theater to attend a movie. This proposal allows AMC to capture that share of the movie going audience who also want to consume an alcoholic beverage as they enjoy watching a movie. Due to the proximity of the proposed use to existing similar uses, no issues of land use incompatibility have been identified. As part of staff s review of this proposal we contacted several cities who recently approved a MacGuffins; including Ontario, Burbank, and Tustin: Ontario's was recently approved, and had not yet opened, Burbank's had only been open for 2 weeks and there were no alcohol related Item F-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00915—AMC THEATER (MACGUFFIN'S BAR & LOUNGE) January 28, 2015 Page issues, and Tustin's had been open since 2007 and has had no alcohol related issues since opening. The ABC did not have any issues relative to the sale of alcohol inside the theater, as long as their requirements were met (Exhibit G). Additionally, as part of the review of this application, staff contacted the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs Department to obtain their input. Their comments (Exhibit H) include: wrist bands for those 21 and older purchasing alcoholic beverages, different size or color cups to distinguish alcoholic drinks, more frequent checks of the theater, and more security assigned to the theater. These comments have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval. C. Parking Requirements: Section 17.64 of the Development Code establishes parking requirements for cinemas and identifies that when located in centers of 100,000 to 200,000 square feet, additional parking is only required after the first 750 seats, and then requires 3 parking spaces for each 100 additional seats. Parking is not required for food service areas within the cinema. As the proposed use does not add additional seating capacity to the theater, no additional parking spaces are required since the total parking requirement for the theater was met when the theater was developed. D. Operational Controls: MacGuffins is intended for persons aged 21 -years and over. Conditions of approval and AMC policy requires servers to check ID's for patrons purchasing alcoholic beverages. AMC policy limits purchases to one (1) alcoholic beverage at a time, although ABC allows two (2) at a time. Should a patron desire an alcoholic beverage, they must purchase it • from MacGuffins, as there will be no hostess services in any of the theaters. Once purchased, patrons may take their alcoholic beverage into any theater, just as they traditionally would with non-alcoholic beverage and other concession items. To distinguish alcoholic beverages from non-alcoholic beverages, a separate transparent cup will be used for serving alcohol (Exhibit F). No glass bottles or original containers will be allowed into any theater. Additionally, MacGuffins will serve alcoholic beverages only. If patrons would also like to purchase typical theater concessions they must be purchased from the snack counter. AMC has adopted a variety of operational alcohol policies designed to ensure the overall safety of its patrons and compliance with all applicable laws. To ensure that minors do not gain access to another patrons' alcoholic beverage, they have established alcohol control policies which it mandates at all of its theaters that serve alcoholic beverages. These policies include: • Age Restriction/Identification Required for Purchases— In connection with the sale of alcohol, associates must require positive proof of age from all guests regardless of age. The Sheriff's Department established a condition requiring wrist bands to be worn for all persons 21 purchasing and alcoholic beverage. • Identification Required for Possession — Any patron in possession of an alcoholic beverage who appears to be under the age of 21 will be required to show valid identification. • Zero Tolerance for Minors in Possession —If any minor is found to be in possession of an alcoholic beverage, the theater's manager must be notified immediately and law • enforcement will be called. Item F-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00915—AMC THEATER (MACGUFFIN'S BAR & LOUNGE) January 28, 2015 Page • Distinctive Glassware — Alcoholic beverages will be served in distinctive glassware to differentiate from glassware containing non-alcoholic beverages. Glassware Size — Glasses for beer and cocktails are a standard 16 ounce size, while glasses for wine are 10 ounces. Because a 16 ounce glass is used for cocktails, yet only one shot of alcohol is poured per glass, the amount of alcohol relative to the non-alcoholic cocktail mix significantly reduces the risk of intoxication compared to other establishments that sell alcoholic beverages. • Certified Server Training — Each staff member of the theater will undergo Training for Intervention Procedures (TIPS), a nationally recognized training program for alcohol servers. Upon hire, all sales employees are required to sign a form acknowledging that failure to follow AMC's rules, policies, and procedures provided in the alcohol control plan will lead to immediate disciplinary action, up to and including termination. Because they all receive training, all AMC staff members are charged with supervising the consumption of alcohol throughout the theater and auditoriums. • Mystery Shopper Program —A mystery shopper program conducted by an outside firm is utilized to ensure all AMC employees are following company alcohol control policies. The mystery shopper program is centered around a zero tolerance threshold. Any employee who is found to violate AMC's alcohol control policies is terminated. • Hours of Operation —AMC will comply with all local and state regulations for the cutoff of alcohol sales. • Continual Theater Monitoring — AMC requires security personnel or theater staff to monitor individual theaters a minimum of once every 30 minutes. All persons who monitor theaters are required to undergo TIPS training, which provides them with the skills necessary to identify and deal with underage drinking or inappropriate behavior. • Alcohol Compliance Monitoring — Whenever MacGuffins is open, a manager must oversee operations and observe the flow of guests and bartender execution. No non- alcoholic beverages are sold at MacGuffins to facilitate the observation of guests purchasing alcohol. • Intoxicated Guests — In the event a guest appears intoxicated, a manager must be notified- immediately. -- The following steps' must be taken to ensure the issue is appropriately addressed: 1) remove the guest from the auditorium, 2) ask the guest not to leave the building, 3)diffuse the situation by providing water and food, 4) make alternative arrangements for the guest to get home, 5) monitor the guest's location, and 6) notify law enforcement if the guest insists on leaving. The ABC has standard licensing conditions that strictly define the nature of alcohol sales. These conditions include limitations on the size of alcoholic beverages, limits on the number of alcoholic beverages that can be sold per transaction, and regular monitoring of activity within the theaters. Specifically, the ABC conditions include the following: Item-F-4 - .. . -- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00915-AMC THEATER (MACGUFFIN'S BAR & LOUNGE) • January 28, 2015 Page • Alcohol Service —All sales and service of alcohol for consumption shall be made only from concession stands, portable stands or bars, or fixed bars, and shall not be sold, served, or delivered to customers. • Number of Drinks—No more than two (2) alcoholic beverages shall be sold or served to any one (1) person during any transaction; however, AMC's policy is stricter than this condition, and mandates that each patron may only purchase one (1) alcoholic beverage during any transaction. Finally, AMC employs security guards to ensure the safety of patrons and to prevent the sale of alcohol to minors and intoxicated persons. AMC's uniformed security guards work at all theater entrances and exits during peak hours, and AMC will adjust security schedules as necessary depending on volume and show schedules. To ensure compatibility and minimize the potential for any operational issues, a number of Conditions of Approval are included in the resolution of approval, including ABC and AMC requirements and policies as well as conditions recommended by the Sherriff's Department and staff. E. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) • and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 — Existing Facilities, because the project involves the expansion of the theater concession areas and the sale of alcoholic beverages inside the existing AMC 12 Theater and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. FACTS FOR FINDING: The Development Code (Section 17.16.120(D)) identifies that the Planning Commission shall approve, or approve with conditions, an application for a Conditional Use Permit after making certain findings. The following findings are included in the resolution of approval for the Planning Commission's consideration: 1. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. The Commercial Standards of the Victoria Community Plan permit movie theaters in the Regional Center (RC) District-and Conditionally Permitted Uses listed under the General Commercial District of the Development Code. Development Code Section 17.30.030 (and Table 17.30.030-1) permits Restaurants with Full Liquor Service in the General Commercial (GC) District, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The sale of alcoholic beverages at a theater, in connection with its restaurant component, is substantially compatible with other land uses in the vicinity and is consistent with General Plan Policy LU-1, which encourages commercial centers to provide a broad range of retail service needs for the community. 2. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all • related performance criteria and development standards. The existing AMC 12 Theater occupies a building that was developed in conformance with all Development Code standards Item F-5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00915—AMC THEATER (MACGUFFIN'S BAR& LOUNGE) January 28, 2015 Page and conditions of approval have been imposed to ensure that the use will comply with the Performance Standards set forth in Development Code Section 17.66 and will not create adverse impacts upon adjacent uses or within the community. 3. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The design of the project, including a separate concession area for the service of alcohol, the applicant's operational controls and policies, and the conditions of approval will ensure proper control over the service of alcohol to patrons. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, Candyce nett Planning Director. CB:TG/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Plan Exhibit B - Site Plan Detail Exhibit C - Floor Plan Exhibit D - Floor Plan Detail Exhibit E - Applicant's Project Description and Findings Exhibit F - MacGuffins Cup Example Exhibit G - ABC Standard Conditions Exhibit H - Sheriff's Department Comments Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2014-00915 Item F-6 __ m AMC�ctorfa Garclens 12 Thea[re s a Lr -J�r yd ,.� I U IB d t0 uj a o lie J 0L 1 N C y111I L� mW1 �J I I j .yr . W U Ililll' .rr� ILSIrl _u - le % �c III{' r r� ��- �I l..'m�. Im-^.`� `--- - - ----f CINEMA . � 1 ...-Fooniai eou�vnRo lnotlrE ee)— PARCEL PIAN, ex. e I. all L �f M 2 • . ,.� 3ammm \� •� m���s Malmo gog�a��w.canalp M `R1R40� IN r MA m NA C26 Oil CWEMA ENCLOSED ENC ANK+04i +K*13 a r rr ' /L• rs �� a�14 hg. y\�' 4 mill, 21 .� 2.81 ' •S 'i ` r ME ��U � �AVAA SOV 7© A `.,... ff \\ II II 1111 v #\ lilt .�I t ,i� �.3nnnn ♦�♦ n n n n Ycf[S A OEM ULM _ _\JI432�° y i 1. 1, 1 , �:iAJ�� 5■�� ���-��3>� ' � -��._ ill 1 III-.. , � :. � :. \ �!I■i[�' � iF'dl3rz ,IEE III , ^ `� \�\\\� \ I�1 ,,1•:S•a a •�� D qN II II II II w� .. r y L7) ON S �■I � u— —r s fIJS ��I'M.y'��i■■I�[-s V °g3?k. `i, ��� �A'}�i Syr a 3F', i[ 31 4• JIM : 1 ■■WIC`-'sa 33»a.: ;�-a � I D 413 +�WB \� +C■ ■■III r IaInSMn a iL'�An ■ � �A�ri1�I■ ■■ sv nr . ::ro -° � ���� �1■■ ■■III -, i .r."r§ rir•'& �I �•`.. .,. -- a•,w�3:73'. �• �■■ ■■s i ,� .e� u� -1 r,v[['1•[e�[ :d s«+. � ��. ■IT:a� �■III 3 r� ! : is n 1=��•: ..ei..i'3=3 ��` wai • .r -ai a r•. ^, .� � ��■■ ■■Ili i L_.�..p s3�••,,•Az:[i�,,E is i1i•' W. y • w• '�. ■ �^ t �■■■ ■■Ills 3rT��'�,-� 1 [ • -i,ii Y.L�I�i3� i I"s� sa 'a . y v : ■■■ ■■III a i d i y3 °iu. i i F�� Y �,•, , _� � } ��■■ ■■ � t�!•rr :�.: 1µi1'[ y�:a� ',1w ,.���•� \�■■ ■■nli�L n :: t • i3i i' 9�ii�l : grrgi x r'1 . . • . ��■■ ■■1110 1 a S"� • [..N a �ii�{t��a,i{{• •,•,lid ;. u■ ■■ z of �. `�■ ■■1 � �a���'� to AWINNO ■ I `����\■ ■■ill ���� J��'L \ \ ■■QE iel kiyl ;ir+i �el 11■N , gyp. 9 ligil, r ,� an 1"sI6�; Al \` ��.� • Ii.YS 13'33 —[411 r�• ,. to QI - ■Vii-- _li�i•:>.Fz \ 1[ III ,� t■��� /.1 i sia3i-�id�N3 a ss,\; fUl' WNL ♦,■■ri■��'■■,Eta e\ `\I£J■�1I■■■II - ..., . . - lot, i .1 AMC Victoria Gardens 12 Rancho Cucamonga Project Description and Findings—CUP for Alcohol Sales Request American Multi-Cinema, hie. ("AMC' or the "Applicant") requests a Conditional Use Permit("CUP")pursuant to Section 17.16.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code ("RCMC" or"Municipal Code") to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption at the existing AMC 12 Theatre (the "Theatre" or"Site") at the Victoria Gardens Shopping Center("Victoria Gardens"). The Theatre is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") and is an anchor of Victoria Gardens, located at 12600 North Mainstreet, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739. The sale of alcohol will be incidental to existing food sales at the AMC 12 Theatre, and will allow for the consumption of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with expanded food options. Project Description The Site �« f men i 11 AMC proposes to allow on-site alcohol sales at the existing AMC 12 Theatre(the "Project'). A CUP is required for the Project pursuant to RCMC § 17.30.030. The Project also requires a Type 47 On-Sale General Eating Place alcohol license ("Type 47 License") from the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control ("ABC'),which authorizes the sale of alcohol at eating places which make actual and substantial sales of meals for consumption on the premises (.a"bona fide eating place"). The Project would expand food offerings at the AMC 12 Theatre, and incorporate the sale of alcoholic beverages to adult patrons in a separate area, American Molti-Cinema,Inc. Conditional Use Permit Application October 13,2014 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT E Item F-11 identified as "MacGuffins." No external modifications, increases in square footage, or changes that would otherwise increase parking requirements are proposed. The Theatre encompasses approximately 61,283 square feet and features 2,190 seats distributed among its 12 auditoriums. It is an integral part of the 147-acre, 1.5 million square foot site comprising Victoria Gardens, located north of Foothill Boulevard between Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue adjacent to Interstate 15. In addition to the Theatre, Victoria Gardens offers over 175 retail shops and restaurants, including stores such as Macy's, JCPenny, H&M, Williams-Sonoma, Pottery Barn, and restaurants such as.Yard House, The Cheesecake Factory, Lucille's Smokehouse Barbeque,Toby Keith's I Love This Bar& Grill, and other retail and dining destinations. The Site is designated as a Mixed Use Commercial Regional Center and is subject to the Victoria Gardens Master Plan, which describes the.area as "the mixed-use center of the Victoria Arbors community within the larger region of the Victoria Community of villages." The AMC 12 Theatre is an anchor tenant for the wide variety of retail and entertainment uses located within Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center. The Site is surrounded primarily by commercial uses, with residential uses to the north across Church Street. RCMC § 17.30.030 allows for the sale of alcoholic beverages on-site by obtaining a conditional use permit. AMC is proposing to upgrade the existing concession area to provide expanded food and non-alcoholic beverage options. A separate area,to be known as"MacGuffins," will be located apart from the general concession area,where adult moviegoers with proper identification will be able to order alcoholic drinks (beer,wine, or spirits) from MacGuffins. Patrons will then be able to take their purchased food and drinks to their seats in the auditoriums. Currently, 65 AMC locations include a MacGuffins. This model, embraced by theatres and communities nationwide, is consistent with alcohol sales at entertainment venues throughout the country. For instance, numerous cities now permit alcohol sales in movie theatres, including: Tampa, Florida; Chicago, Illinois; San Francisco, California; and Minneapolis, Minnesota. The increase in permitted alcohol sales at theatres demonstrates that such sales can improve the movie-going experience for adults, while continuing to ensure the safety of all theatre patrons. To that end, AMC developed operational alcohol policies designed to ensure that alcohol sales at its theatres will not jeopardize the safety and security of any patrons. With the Project, AMC seeks to create an entertainment environment attractive to adult patrons. .The movie theatre industry is currently undergoing a noteworthy transition period. Because of the advent and proliferation of Netflix,Redbox, and other new sources of entertainment,traditional movie theatres are facing significant challenges and must work to reinvent themselves. Key to winning back those patrons that have opted for other entertainment options—especially adults—is the creation of a more up-scale movie experience through the provision of services and amenities beyond those customarily associated with most existing theatres. The sale of alcoholic beverages and expanded food options at the AMC 12 Theatre would increase the attractiveness of the theatre, and in turn,Victoria Gardens. American Multi-Cinema,Inc. Conditional Use Permit Application October 13,2014 Page 2 of 7 Item F-12 • Findings as Required by RCMC§ 17.16.120 1. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. The Project is allowed within the applicable zoning district and will comply with all applicable provisions of the Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and all other applicable regulations/standards. The proposed use is located within an existing business that was developed in compliance with the Municipal Code and the sale of alcoholic beverages at this location is permitted upon approval of a conditional use permit. The sale of alcoholic beverages at the Theatre in connection with its restaurant component is substantially compatible with other uses in the area and allowed through the acquisition of a conditional use permit under RCMC 17.30.030. The Site is designated as a Mixed Use Commercial Regional Center and is subject to the Victoria Gardens Master Plan, which describes the area as "the mixed-use center of the Victoria Arbors community within the larger region of the Victoria Community of villages." The AMC 12 Theatre is an anchor tenant within Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center. Victoria Garden includes a wide variety of retail and entertainment uses to serve residents and visitors of the City. The Site is surrounded primarily by commercial uses with residential uses to its North across Church Street. RCMC § 17.30.030 allows for the sale of alcoholic beverages on-site by • obtaining a conditional use permit. The sale of alcoholic beverages at the AMC 12 Theatre is compatible with the other uses within Victoria Gardens. Victoria Gardens serves as a central retail, dining and entertainment destination for area residents,businesses and visitors. The shopping center includes small and large retail stores and restaurants, several of which serve alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption, including restaurants like Yard House, The Cheesecake Factory, Lucille's Smokehouse Barbeque, and Toby Keith's I Love This Bar & Grill. The sale of alcoholic beverages is compatible with and expected with such uses. Victoria Gardens offers individuals an array of shopping and entertainment, but does not provide a theatre that serves alcoholic beverages, a trait attractive to adults seeking a more expansive movie-going experience. As more people patronize the AMC 12 Theatre, it is expected that moviegoers will also enjoy the other opportunities present at Victoria Gardens and throughout the City, thus promoting existing commercial and retail uses.._. Moreover, the sale of alcoholic beverages is compatible with the other use in the surrounding neighborhood. The shopping center is located in a highly commercial setting characterized by retail establishments, restaurants, and entertainment offerings. The predominately commercial nature of development in the area makes it an appropriate location for the sale of alcoholic beverages. The shopping center and surrounding area already have a number of restaurants and bars which sell alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption, and the addition of alcohol sales at the Theatre will complement and be consistent with those offerings. American Multi-Cinema,Inc. Conditional Use Permit Application October 13,2014 Page 3 of 7 Item F-13 Accordingly,based upon its location within a commercial center surrounded by other commercial uses, the sale of alcoholic beverages at the existing Theatre is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Third, the addition of alcoholic beverages will be non-disruptive to the character of existing development. It will not require any physical changes to the exterior of the existing Theatre and will comply with all applicable City provisions, regulations, and standards upon approval of a conditional use permit. Finally, the addition of alcohol sales to the existing Theatre will not disturb AMC's neighbors. The location of the Theatre and the surrounding uses make it an appropriate, convenient, and safe location for the sale of alcohol without negative impacts on neighbors. No expansion of the existing Theatre is proposed in connection with the addition of alcohol sales and the shopping center already provides ample, safe on-site parking in a secured parking lot. AMC has successfully incorporated alcohol sales into its theatres for many years and has a vested interest in ensuring that its patrons are safe and that its neighbors are not adversely affected. 2. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use, including with respect to access,utilities, and the absence of physical constraints. Likewise, it can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The Project will be located within Victoria Gardens in the existing theatre building. Two major arterials, Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard, along with Interstate 15, serve the Site and are capable of handling all traffic associated with Victoria Gardens. The proposed use will not overload the capacity of the surrounding street system and will not create a hazard to public safety. Instead, the Project will enhance the entertainment options available in the region, and therefore encourage customers to spend time and money in a safe, accessible environment within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Furthermore,patrons will be able to enjoy dinner, drinks and a movie in the same location, and the Theatre is within walking distance of many other commercial uses and activities. This Project will help reinforce the role of Victoria Gardens and its surrounding areas as the premier retailing destination in the City and region.. The location of the Theatre and the surrounding uses make it an appropriate, convenient, and safe location for the sale of alcohol without negative impacts on neighbors. No expansion of the existing Theatre is proposed in connection with the addition of alcohol sales and the shopping center already provides ample, safe on-site parking in a secured parking lot. AMC has successfully incorporated alcohol sales into its theatres for many years and has a vested interest in ensuring that its patrons are safe and that its neighbors are not adversely affected. The sale of alcoholic beverages at the Theatre is substantially compatible with other uses in the area, including factors relating to the nature of the location, operation, and traffic characteristics. American Multi-Cinema,Inc. Conditional Use Permit Application October 13,2014 Page 4 of 7 Item F-14 • 3. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons,property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The Project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, and will not be materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the Project is located. As evidenced by its stellar history in operating theatres that sell alcohol, AMC takes very seriously its responsibilities as a.provider of entertainment and takes all possible precaution to ensure the safety of its patrons. To that end, AMC has adopted operational alcohol policies designed to ensure the overall safety of the movie-going experience and compliance with local, state, and federal regulations: For example, AMC uses a variety of techniques to ensure that minors do not gain access to other patrons' alcoholic beverages and has established alcohol control policies which it mandates at all of its theatres that serve alcoholic beverages. Those policies include the following mechanisms to safeguard the safety and security of all patrons: • Age Restriction/Identification Required for Purchases—In connection with the sale of alcohol, associates must require positive proof of age from all guests regardless of age. • Identification Required for Possession—Any patron in possession of an alcoholic • beverage who appears to be under the age of 21 will be required to show valid identification. • Zero Tolerance for Minors in Possession—If any minor is found to be in possession of an alcoholic beverage, the theatre's manager must be notified immediately and law enforcement will be called. • " Distinctive Glassware—Alcoholic beverages will be served in distinctive glassware to differentiate from glassware containing non-alcoholic beverages. • Glassware Size—Glasses for beer and cocktails are a standard 16 ounce size, while glasses for wine are 10 ounces. Because a 16 ounce glass is used for cocktails, yet only one shot of alcohol is poured per glass, the amount of alcohol relative to the non- alcoholic cocktail mix significantly reduces the risk of intoxication compared to other establishments that sell alcoholic beverages. • Certified Server Training—Each staff member of the theatre will undergo Training for Intervention Procedures (TIPS), a nationally recognized training program for alcohol servers. Upon hire, all sales employees are required to sign a form acknowledging that failure to follow AMC's rules, policies, and procedures provided in the alcohol control plan will lead to immediate disciplinary action,up to and including termination. Because they all receive training, all AMC staff members are • American Multi-Cinema,Inc. Conditional Use Permit Application Page 5 of 7 October 13,2014 Item F-15 charged with supervising the consumption of alcohol throughout the theatre and auditoriums. • Mystery Shopper Program—A mystery shopper program conducted by an outside firm is utilized to ensure all AMC employees are following company alcohol control policies. The mystery shopper program is centered around a zero tolerance threshold. Any employee who is found to violate AMC's alcohol.control policies is terminated. • Hours of Operation—AMC will comply with all local and state regulations for the cutoff of alcohol sales. • Continual Theatre Monitoring AMC requires security personnel or theatre staff to monitor individual theatres a minimum of once every 30 minutes. All persons who monitor theatres are required to undergo.TIPS training, which.provides them with'the skills necessary to identify and deal with underage drinking or inappropriate behavior. • Alcohol Compliance Monitoring—Whenever MacGuffins is open, a manager must oversee operations and observe the flow of guests and bartender execution. No non- alcoholic beverages are sold at MacGuffins to facilitate the observation of guests purchasing alcohol. • Intoxicated Guests—In the event a guest appears intoxicated, a manager must be notified immediately. The following steps must be taken to ensure the issue is appropriately addressed: (1) remove the guest from the auditorium, (2) ask the guest not to leave the building, (3) diffuse the situation by providing water and.food, (4) make alternative arrangements for the guest to get home, (5) monitor the guest's location, and(6) notify law enforcement if the guest insists on leaving. Likewise, ABC has standard licensing conditions which would strictly define the nature of alcohol sales at the AMC 12Theatre. These conditions include limitations on the.size of alcoholic beverages, limits on the number of alcoholic beverages that can be sold per transaction, and regular-monitoring of activity within the theatres. Specifically,the ABC conditions include the following, among others: • Alcohol Service—All sales and service of alcohol-for-consumption shall be made only from concession stands,portable stands or bars,.or fixed bars, and shall not be sold, served, or delivered to customers. • Number of Drinks—No more than two (2) alcoholic beverages shall be sold or served to any one (1) person during any transaction. AMC's policy is more strict than this condition, and mandates that each patron may only purchase one(1) alcoholic beverage during any transaction. Finally, AMC employs security guards to ensure the safety of patrons and to prevent the American Multi-Cinema,Inc.. Conditional Use Permit Application October 13,2014 Page 6 of 7 Item F-16 • sale of alcohol to minors and intoxicated persons. AMC's uniformed security guards work at all theatre entrances and exits during peak hours, and AMC will adjust security schedules as necessary.depending on volume and show schedules. The sale of alcohol at theatres is becoming increasingly common, and AMC has been successfully operating theatres that incorporate alcohol service for more than ten years. Currently, approximately 65 AMC locations include a MacGuffins. AMC's experience demonstrates that the sale of alcohol does not contribute to any behavior that may be detrimental to the public welfare. The AMC theatres which include a MacGuffins, for example, have not seen any increases in negative incidents after the introduction of alcoholic beverage service. AMC attributes this to a number of factors. First, alcohol sales increase the amount of adult moviegoers looking for a more up-scale movie theatre experience. Second, the consumption of alcohol at theatres is not necessarily a"social" experience as it is in bars and the cost of alcoholic beverages at theatres is higher than at other alcohol serving establishments;thus,.AMC's theatres do not attract people whose primary goal is to drink alcohol. Finally,moviegoers patronize theatres primarily for the movie viewing experience, not to purchase alcoholic beverages. AMC has discovered that individuals who purchase alcoholic beverages generally do not return to purchase more after the showing begins because they, quite simply, do not want to miss any of the movie. In that vein, AMC's nationwide average for alcoholic beverages is just 1.1 drinks per person who purchases alcohol. Therefore, the Project would not be detrimental to the public interest,health, safety, convenience, or welfare, and will not be materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the Project is located. . American Multi-Cinema,Inc. Conditional Use Permit Application October 13,2014 Page 7 of 7 Item F-17 �;i.,•�1_<_ ::�: tea! � ''�:7 '.i.,,:"",,Su '•+��r'V.� - �•e t 3r;;�+ LTi •5.,: k'�. 1 �y '�" 'ia, ,', . , • s�L , r%,'L :stir:A,• ��.. ,.. �' � li'' � ,'4+� .+.c•1` :<=1:x "�:": 1 M/''., � � � •+J..^ Ott III ... � ! • � .. .. .j•. .. .. , o. y��.�,�Lt �'4'1 �•�.'y'..]'�� ✓ V L V 2 r EXHIBIT F 1 6S tiv� • ABC Standard Conditions 01. At all times when the premises is exercising the privileges of their license,the sale of food, in compliance with Section 23038 of the Business and Professions Code, shall be offered and available for purchase. 02. All sales and service of alcoholic beverages for consumption in the general spectator seating areas shall be made only from concession stands,portable stands or bars, or fixed bars,and shall not be sold, served, or delivered to customers by individual ambulatory vendors,commonly known as"hawkers". 03. Points of sale of alcoholic beverages shall not be maintained within the theater auditoriums. 04. Notwithstanding conditions.#2&#3,above,alcoholic beverages may be sold or served by waiters or waitresses in the general spectator seating areas under the following conditions: a. Only persons occupying seats in the designated theaters shall be permitted to order and be served alcoholic beverages. b. Orders from patrons seated in these theaters must be made to the waiter or waitress serving that area, and the alcoholic beverages must be personally delivered to the patron by the waiter or waitress who took the order. c. The waiter or waitress serving in the theaters shall not carry a supply of unordered alcoholic beverages. 05. No more than two(2) alcoholic beverages shall be sold or served to any one(1) person during any transaction. 06. Alcoholic beverages shall be served in containers which significantly differ in appearance from those containers utilized for non-alcoholic beverages. Containers for beer shall not exceed 16 ounces. This condition does not preclude the service of alcoholic beverages in their original containers 07. At all times when the premises is exercising the privileges of their license, an employee of the premises shall enter and monitor the activity within the theaters on a regular basis, but no less than once every 30 minutes. XHIBIT G Item F-19 Grahn, Tom rom: Kovensky,Janne ent: Friday, December 19, 2014 1:38 PM To: Grahn,Tom. Subject: RE:AMC Ontario- CUP Wrist bands for those 21 or older Different size or color cups for the alcohol than for the non-alcohol drinks More frequent checks of the theater while the movie is playing More security guards assigned to the theater Jason and I discussed the issue and came up with these conditions. TM Janna 20venskY, Deputy Sheriff *,-an Bernarno County Sheriffs Department ncho Cucamonga Station EXHIBIT H Item F-20 RESOLUTION NO. 15-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. DRC2014-00915, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES (TYPE 47 - ON-SALE GENERAL FOR BONA FIDE. PUBLIC EATING PLACE) IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE EXISTING VICTORIA GARDENS AMC 12 MOVIE THEATER, IN THE REGIONAL CENTER (RC) DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT 12600 NORTH MAINSTREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 109053105. A. Recitals. 1. American Multi-Cinema, Inc., filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. DRC2014-00915, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of January 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on January 28, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 12600 North Mainstreet which is presently improved with the AMC 12 Theater within the Victoria Gardens Shopping Center; and b. The property to the north and east of the subject site is improved with a parking lot, and the property to the south and west is improved with existing commercial buildings; and C. The AMC 12 Theater encompasses approximately 61,283 square feet and features 2,190 seats distributed among 12 auditoriums; and d. The application proposes to upgrade the existing concession area to provide expanded food and non-alcoholic beverage options. A separate area, to be known as • "MacGuffins"will be located apart from the general concession area, and will sell alcoholic drinks (wine, beer, and spirits). Patrons will then be able to take their purchased food and drinks to their seats in the auditoriums. Item F-21 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-05 DRC2015-00915 -AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC January 28, 2015 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal.Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. The Commercial Standards of the Victoria Community Plan permit movie theaters in the Regional Center (RC) District and Conditionally Permitted Uses listed under the General Commercial District of the Development Code. Development Code Section 17.30.030 (and Table 17.30.030-1) permits Restaurants with Full Liquor Service in the General Commercial (GC) District, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The sale of alcoholic beverages at a theater, in connection with its restaurant component, is substantially compatible with other land uses in the vicinity and is consistent with General Plan Policy LU-1, which encourages commercial centers to provide a broad range of retail service needs for the community. b. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The existing AMC 12 Theater occupies a building that was developed in conformance with all Development Code standards and conditions of approval have been imposed to ensure that the use will comply with the Performance Standards set forth in Development Code Section 17.66 and will.not create adverse impacts upon adjacent uses or within the community. C. Granting thepermit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The design of the project, including a separate concession area for the service of alcohol, the applicant's operational controls and policies, and the conditions of approval will ensure proper control over the service of alcohol to patrons. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines . Section 15301 — Existing Facilities, because the project involves the expansion of the theater concession areas and the sale of alcoholic beverages inside the existing AMC 12 Theater and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth the attached Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Item F-22 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-05 DRC2015-00915 -AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC January 28, 2015 Page 3 BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item F-23 Conditions of Approval CHO JCPAMoMONG'A Community Development Department Project#: DRC2014-00915 Project Name: ALCOHOL SALES 111 AMC VICTORIA GARDENS Location: 12600 NORTH MAINSTREET- 109053105-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval is granted to establish alcoholic beverage sales (Type 47- On-Sale General for Bona Fide Public Eating Place) in conjunction with the existing Victoria Gardens AMC 12 Movie Theater, in the Regional Center (RC) District of the Victoria Planned Community, located at 12600 North ainstreet. Any patron in possession of an alcoholic beverage who appears to be under the age of 21 shall be required to show valid identification. 4. If. operation of this Conditional Use Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to, noise, loitering, parking, disturbances, excessive demand on public services, or violation of ABC requirements, or if any of the Conditions of Approval are not fulfilled properly, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension, modification, or revocation. 5. The days and hours of operation of alcoholic beverage sales shall be limited to 10:30 a.m. to 12:30 a.m., seven days a week. 6. Prior to any use of the project site floor area, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. ..... 7. In connection with the sale of alcohol, associates shall require positive proof of age from all guests, regardless of age. 8. The sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises is strictly prohibited. Management and security shall be responsible for ensuring that patrons with alcohol do not leave the premises. 9. Employees and contract security personnel shall not consume any alcoholic beverages during the work shift. • Printed:1/21/2015 www.CityofRC.us Item F-24 Project#: DRC2014-00915 Project Name: ALCOHOL SALES ///AMC VICTORIA GARDENS Location: 12600 NORTH MAINSTREET- 109053105-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 10. A file containing the names and dates of employment of every person serving alcoholic beverages for consumption by patrons on the licensed premises, and every manager, shall be kept on. the premises. The file shall also include a copy of each person's certificate of completion of the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control L.E. A. D. course (Licensee Education . on Alcohol and Drugs) or equivalent. Upon request, said file shall be made available for review to representatives of the City. of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. New employees will have 90 days from date of employment to obtain L.E.A.D:certification or equivalent. 11. There shall be a Designated Driver Program wherein there is an incentive to the person not drinking alcoholic beverages, who is in a group of three or more, to be the designated driver for that group of patrons. 12. There shall be a taxi-ride program where the establishment will offer to call a taxi for patrons when it seems appropriate. Phone numbers of local taxi companies shall be posted for viewing by patrons. 13. Any patron who (1) fights or challenges another person to fight, (2) maliciously and willfully disturbs another person by loud or unreasoned noise, or (3) uses offensive words which are inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction shall be removed from the premises. 14. Occupancy of the project floor area shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance. 15. The theater shall employ a sufficient number of management and security personnel to enforce the requirements of the City, Sheriff, ABC, and AMC. If issues arise, the theater operator shall hire additional security at the request of the City and or Sheriffs Department. All security personnel shall be familiar with establishment's conditions of approval and written security policy and procedures by reviewing them and signing they have read and understood the policy. The signed acknowledgement shall.be kept in file relating the security manual. 16. Prior to utilizing a contract security guard company, the establishment shall verify the security company has a current City of Rancho Cucamonga Business License. 17. The applicant shall maintain a closed circuit television system capable of readily identifying facial features and stature of all patrons entering the establishment during hours of type operation. Cameras are to be recorded and a library of events shall be kept and available for a minimum of 30 days for inspection by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. 18. Patrons who appear obviously intoxicated shall not be served any alcoholic beverages. 19. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plan and floor plan on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code.regulations, the Victoria Gardens Master Plan, and the Victoria Community Plan. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 4 Printed:1/21/2015 Item F-25 Project#: DRC2014-00915 Project Name: ALCOHOL SALES///AMC VICTORIA GARDENS Location: 12600 NORTH MAINSTREET- 109053105-0000 laroject Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 20. No more than one (1) alcoholic beverage shall be sold or served to any one (1) person during any transaction. There shall be no "stacking" of drinks, i.e., sale of more than one drink at a time, to a single patron. 21. An incident log shall be maintained at the licensed premises on a continual basis with at least one year of entries and be readily available for inspection by a police officer. The log is for recording any physical altercations„ injuries, and objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance occurring in, on, or at the licensed premises, including the immediately adjacent area that is owned, leased, or rented by the action taken. "objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance" means disturbance of the peace, public drunkenness, drinking in public, harassment of passersby, gambling, prostitution, loitering, public urination, lewd conduct, drug trafficking, or excessive loud noise. 22. There shall be no promotions encouraging intoxication or drinking contests. or advertisements indicating "Buy one drink, get one free." "Two for the price of one," or "All you can drink for..." or similar language. 23. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in 1ffect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 4. Alcoholic beverages shall be served in. distinctive glassware to differentiate from9 lassware containing non-alcoholic beverages. 25. The owner or manager of the licensed premises shall maintain on the premises a written security policy and procedures manual addressing at a minimum the following items: Handling obviously intoxicated person; establishing a reasonable ratio of employees to patrons based upon activity level in order to monitor beverage sales and patron behavior; handling patrons involved in fighting or arguing;. handlingloitering about the building and in the immediate adjacent area that is owned, leased, rented or used under agreement by the Licensee(s); verifying age/checking identification of patrons; warning patrons of reaching their drinking limit/potential intoxication and refusing to serve; calling the police regarding observed or reported criminal activity. 26. The applicant must use an identity card .scanner.__(ID_...Scanner) anytime the premises is selling alcoholic beverages. (Definition of ID Scanner: .An ID Scanner automates and documents the age of verification process by scanning the ID through a card reader). The ID Scanner should record and timestamp the name, identification number, and date of birth on the identity card provided by patrons. This information should be recorded and maintained for a minimum of thirty (30) days. The business will provide the ID Scanner records to law enforcement upon request. 27. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 28. Wrist bands shall be provided and worn by all persons aged 21 and older to purchase an Walcoholic beverage. The wrist band shall be worn at all times while the patron is handling, ansporting, and consuming an alcoholic beverage while at the premises. Printed:1/21/2015 w,w,.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 4 Item F-26 Project#: DRC2014-00915 Project Name: ALCOHOL SALES///AMC VICTORIA GARDENS Location: 12600 NORTH MAINSTREET- 109053105-0000. Project Type: Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 29. The on-site manager of the business shall take whatever steps are deemed necessary to assure the orderly conduct of employees, patrons, and visitors on the premises. This includes, addressing at a minimum the following items: Handling obviously intoxicated persons; establishing a reasonable ratio of employees to patrons, based upon activity level, in order to monitor beverage sales and patron behavior; handling patrons involved in fighting or arguing; handling loitering about .the building and in the immediate adjacent area. that is owned, leased, rented, or used under agreement by the Licensee(s); verifying age/checking identification of patrons; warning patrons of reaching their drinking limit/potential intoxication and refusing to serve; calling the police regarding observed or reported criminal activity. 30. All sales and service of alcohol for consumption shall be made only from the "MacGuffins" concession stand; no portable stands or bars, or fixed bars shall be utilized, and beverages shall not be sold, served, or delivered to customers. 31. The theater manager shall require security personnel or theater staff to monitor individual theatres a minimum of once every 30 minutes, or if issues arise then at an interval acceptable to the City and Sheriffs Department. 32. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. and Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size) submitted for plan check. The sheets are for information only to all parties involved in the constriction activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 33. The business operations shall be in compliance with the regulations and requirements of the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control that apply to Type 47 Alcoholic- Beverage Licenses (On-Sale General for Bona Fide Public Eating Place). 34. Should any minor found to be in possession of an alcoholic beverage, the theater's manager shall be notified immediately and the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs Department shall be called immediately. 35. A clearly legible copy of all Conditional Use Permit conditions of approval shall be posted alongside the necessary.. business ....license_ and _shall . be _.visible. at... all times ..to. employees. Management and security shall ensure that all employees.abide by the Conditions of Approval. 36. All managers, bartenders, and servers shall complete the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program offered by the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control within 60 days of being hired. www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 4 Printed:1/21/2015 Item F-27 STAFF REPORT • PLANN NG DEPARZWVI' DATE: January 28, 2015 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission RANCHO FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director CUCAMONGA BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976 — CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES - A request to subdivide 3.2 acres of land in order to develop 31 detached residential condominiums for a site located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street within the Medium (M) Development District-APNs: 0207-262-01, 02, and 03. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00570 — CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES - Site plan and architectural review of a 31-unit multi-family project on 3.2 acres of land located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street within the Medium (M) Development District — APNs: 0207-262-01, 02 and 03. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission 1) adopt the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration and 2) approve Design Review DRC2014-00570, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18976, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00736 through adoption of the attached Resolutions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: 10.3 Dwelling Units per Acre North - Single-Family Residence; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Future Park Site; Park East - Multi-Family Development; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Multi-Family Development; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential North - Medium Residential South - Park East - Medium Residential West - Medium Residential ANALYSIS: A. Proiect Proposal: The applicant is requesting to subdivide approximately 3.2 acres of land in order to develop a 31-unit, detached residential condominium project located on the east side of • Madrone Avenue, between Arrow Route and 9th Street. The project site is approximately 350 feet from north to south and 369 feet from east to west and is comprised of three parcels that are developed with two homes (8551 and 8583 Madrone Avenue). The homes were both evaluated for historic significance by the City and-determined to be ineligible for listing in the Item G-H 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18976 AND DRC2013-00570—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 2 National Register of Historic Place, the California Register of Historical Resources, or the Local Register of Historical Resources and will be demolished as part of the project. The site is relatively flat and contains 26 trees; nine (9) were determined in the arborist report (Andresen, September 2014) to be Heritage trees, as classified by the Development Code. The location and condition of the trees prevent them from being incorporated into the new project, and all the existing trees will be removed. The Landscape Plan includes the planting of 153 new trees, mitigating the loss of the removed trees. A Tree Removal Permit has been submitted for removal of the 9 Heritage trees that will be reviewed by the Planning Director following review and action on the Design Review and Tentative.Tract Map by the Planning Commission. To the north are two lots developed with single-family residences; to the south is a future City park site that is currently developed with multiple unoccupied buildings; and, to the east and west, are multi-family developments. The project complies with all related Development Standards for the Medium (M) Development District. The front entrances of each unit face either a paseo or the public street (Madrone Avenue). The paseos run along the north, south, and east project perimeter and through the center of the project (east to west and north to south). The garages face the drive aisles with access gates to.the side yards. The units range in size from 1,685 to 2,051 square feet and are all two-story units with a two-car attached garage. The product mix includes 22, three bedroom and 9, four bedroom units. Each unit includes a private courtyard facing a paseo along with 5- and 10-foot private yard areas between the units. The project includes three floor plans with three different architectural styles per floor plan, Spanish, Craftsman, and Country. .The recreational amenities include a swimming facility with bathrooms, showers, and covered barbeque units, a tot lot and open play area, in conformance with the required four recreation amenities. Park benches will be strategically placed throughout the project to provide sitting and gathering areas. The project is also directly adjacent to a future public park which is in the final planning stages. The total lot coverage for all of the units is 36,386 square feet, 25,431 square feet less than the maximum permitted 64,817 square feet (50 percent of project site). The total common and private open space is 64,103 square feet, 18,731 square feet over the minimum requirement of 45,372 square feet (35 percent of the project site). The common open space areas include the paseos, pool area, tot lot and an open play area. The private open space areas (for the exclusive use of the residents) include the courtyards in front of the units (facing the paseos) as - - well as the walled areas on either side of the units. The common open space areas will be maintained by the Home Owners Association and the private open space area will be maintained by the respective homeowners. The Development Code requires 2 parking spaces for each 3 bedroom unit and 2.5 parking spaces for each 4 bedroom unit, along with 1 visitor parking space for every three units. This translates into a parking requirement of 80 parking spaces. The project provides 2 enclosed parking spaces per unit (64 total enclosed parking spaces) along with 5 open parking spaces in compliance with the minimum parking requirement. Additionally, there are 15 open parking spaces designated for guest parking, 4 over the minimum requirement. There is a Eucalyptus windrow on the City park site running along the south property line. The Arborist Report (Steve Andresen, September 28, 2014) for the project recommends that open fencing be used along the south property line in order to minimize disturbance of the Eucalyptus Item G-H 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18976 AND DRC2013-00570 — CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 3 trees. The units facing the south property line will have an open view into the park. The proposed site plan for the future park does not include any play area directly adjacent to the project site. B. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant hosted a neighborhood meeting on October 20, 2014, with 10 residents in attendance. The main topics of discussion were the time line for starting and completing the project; when the existing structures would be demolished, unit size, and expected selling price. Each question was addressed to the attendee's satisfaction and no issues were left unresolved. C. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca, Fletcher, Granger) on November 18, 2014. The main issue raised at the meeting was the proposed ribbon drains in the drive aisles. The Committee determined that the ribbon drain was acceptable as long as it was constructed of decorative concrete. A Condition of Approval is included in the Resolution indicating the requirement for decorative concrete in the ribbon drains. Commissioner Fletcher also recommended that the applicant add additional rafter tails to the Country and Craftsman plans which the applicant agreed to and is shown in attached plans. With these changes, the Committee recommended that the Planning Commission approve the project. D. Technical Review Committee: The project was reviewed by each Committee on November 18, 2014. The Committee approved the project as presented. E. Initial Study Comments: On January 15, 2015, staff received comments from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CAFW) regarding the Initial Study completed for the project. CAFW stated concern that the Biological Survey (Natural Resources Assessment, Inc., August 2014) submitted for the project did not adequately address the potential for Burrowing Owls to nest or forage on the project site. However, the study did state that there were no signs of burrowing owls on the project site. Fish and Wildlife recommended that the applicant be required to perform a Burrowing Owl Survey, conforming to the Department's Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation, prior to any disturbance of the project site. Staff has added a special condition requiring the submittal of a Burrowing Owl Survey prior to approval of a rough grading plan. Fish and Wildlife also recommended that the existing mitigation measure for nesting birds be modified to require a Nesting Bird Survey.prior to approval of a rough grading plan any time during the year, rather than as recommended by the Biological Survey submitted for the project, only if grading takes place during the bird nesting season from Februay 1st through August-31'st. This mitigation- measure was updated as requested and the new mitigation was - forwarded to CAFW along with the new special condition for the Burrowing Owl Survey. F. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA°) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions and geology and soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative • Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. Item G-H 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18976 AND DRC2013-00570—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 4 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff has not received any letters or phone calls expressing concern over the Conditional Use Permit application. Respectfully bmitted, Candyce B eft Planning Director CB:TV/ge Attachments:' Exhibit.A - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Design Review Committee Action Agenda for November 18, 2014 Exhibit C - Initial Study Parts I, II, and III Exhibit D - California Department of Fish and Game.Letter Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18976 Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2014-00570 Item G-H.4 M' • • X Shadow Ridge —Tract No . 18976 1s0, 0 . W 31 Unit Detached Residential Development east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route & 9th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, CA FULL SUBMITTAL PACKAGE - SUBTT18976 - DRC2014-.00570 5th Submittal Date December 1, 2014 Q Q1 Project Site 0 PLAN 1 VICINITY MAPBS69Wd%eAvenue PROJECT INFO SHEET INDEX Y- Ramho Cut mega,G 91 r30 PWl l con,nrrn Dorn scare I SiteTitl Sheet g GAR G EAREAMr. 1,472 sr i 1 Ten Utilization Plan iii SF I IB ®F I---1- r- rod Are 11011 2 Can Tract Map GARAGkMG ` 1 rt COVERED PORCH MEA 60SF B AIDI Tw lm 620Y 3 Conceptual Grading Plan I I ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I — op..sidlele, a,er2 sF 4 Site and Drainage Plan ® C Turf nI.ds 15 SO Y TOTAL 2.217 sF L commwr tRnerore Arras 2s,ea3 sr 5 Conceptual Grading Plan Cut d FIII Exhlhlt ��"I-U__ w --- -- 6 Co. Dr alnage Plan Tad 39.295 SF 7 Detailed Site Plan PLAN 2 - - r —— - rl r ——=—T- e Preliminary Landscape Site Plan vmara own scar• 24,ew$F 9 Prellminary Model Complex Landscape Plans I eutlnrl tis[4kdarlan 10 Pool and Tot Lot Enlargement plan 00 vux: I I 1 Preliminary Wall and Fencing Plans I 3*„ r I _ ^`I° ,:.;}}'( 12 Preliminary Wall and Fencing Plans Ln GAR G E ARE 1.462 Y a,y Ara.PrwNed GARAGE AREA 424Y y tI i' 13 Conceptual Paseo Wall echtel Elevations s -s covFA[DfORLTIMG a 5F _ -- l" 1 bed—nnhr 21 a 44 14 Plan 3-Column/Wall Architectural Elevations "Fr •i'`" I 4 Ndrmm vMs 9 22.S 14 I S Phasing Map At.,� 4..s ,arAL 2,294 YY -r i� L_ _ ) _r G."MRS" 11 x. 16 Overhead Ot111tY Plan 'y III .. I 7ga1 32 Fr.s as 17 Fire Access Plan L •� PLAN 3 i __-, m __ I r- 1 Plan 1-Floor Plans H MN 3 Im1 I I 2 Plan 1-Exterior Elevatlons Style A E I a u n xuxr IAxRscRn Gxo,u 3 %ani-Exterior Elevatlons style's II I na raolrct lAxnsulac suuLr2c ro nrr.svxwwwAlrxrrrrmxrFw 4 Plant-Exterior Elevations Style'C' 0 UNxG AREA 2.09,Y I 1 ®11 ns c9Ns{}NxGlAxlxAll arwurrs--Mcrn.— 5 plan Floor Plans GARAGE AREA 434Y __._____._— m —1 1 _ M u Oncx4 tmasr.nerANlKArtoOcx tMuc 6 %an 2-Exterior Elevations Style'A' xYnaWer. T — N[OtloaAt[ttM YNNIDIAY(ErmI OI..I 1.t%V1r ANrIRNETWLs V COVERED PORCH AREA 92 Sr -IT'-1-I-1-n-1-� r-ITT TTTT -T- li�-TT"'F- —EIN ra aosc rmtanr Au,rxsnr.asrwmx mrurw 7 %en2-Exterlor Elevatlons 5lyle'B' Toru 2,s 92 sr KA—r—a". B Plan 2-Exterior Elevatlons Style'C 7 -� 9 Plan 3-Floor Plans 10 Plan 3-Exterior Elevations Style'A' I 1 Plan 3-Exterior Elevatlons Sryle'13 12 Plan 3-Exterior Elevatlons Slyle'C 13 Pool Bullding-Floor Plan 14 Pool Bullding-Exterlor Elevatlons i LAND OWNER: CONSULTING ARCHITECT: PROJECT CIVIL ENGINEER: DEVELOPER: I Larry Pham.Leo Lee 6 aim Wu Lee 8583 Madrone Ave,Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 I APN 0207-262-01 ' Mark Gross & Associates, Inc. Crestwood 8881 R. hire. akA W re 9ffi,e ENCOMPASS ASSOCIATES. Inc. Communities Vincent Yuen-Pak Szeto, (549)1!/-r.800 Fm(919138/-1BW dwL ENOWEERINO trustee of the Szeto Family Trust "an 8565 Madrona Ave,Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 rn„ero vut rnsa A+SYv.nA K 9a COU91N9 PW;E SIU W.(.tiros W20 Street,Olendnm.G 91740 APN 0207-262-02 a RANCHO CUCAMONGs k,Cs191137 OfTw:626.914.1943 Fla:(626)335-9320 . 49791 eaa ao93,(sxro)4e3aze3 C.bad:Paddy J. Diu,Prrtlect Manager Mao An,Zhou a SSI Madrone Ave.Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 APN 0207-262-03 t SITE UTILIZATION MAP TENTATIVE TRACT NO.18976 ,ki H. I, jjA 1 ..... I...._.........._..........._......_.............................._........_................._......_. ...._................—...... __. .....__..___..... _ ........ ...l rah<�.-. GRAPHIC SCALN I .......... ....__.._........ T ( I ._ —_}.........'..... 1 um a rm R. I � . L.-�.I .. NCOI:PIIFSA9SaCMTEb.WG I D I�IfA-dlol.r V uill�. �C4'O I m VICINITYMAP mo .... _.._....._..._ ..._.............................. - , i s4rae � exhN ! ........ . ......_ 1.._.._....! t_....._....._. .. ... .......... __ ---........................... --' OW 1room�:,.w°°unmr war 2 � 1 1 -0� max+ ,jo ' I � � � � 1 .:..:..I..i r.;..i:.,,..-_.;..i ....!... � ..I..... ; anauraau x rna:r+ssaawc•rzawc. Q w n I I i...;...�:::- -:...:.. ....... .....:...... ; ZONE .,.. o .,rr mecaueeraeve D.. _._._.... xwawac,Nwwwerrzr . .. ... 1-11 ......--- (-._i., . ::, taxo0.meroa :F,mc�wnmureA xe (A II f .:.+.... '. i.._ . 'zo3 m Cao' usnnsrar. 'II . I � ........�: F....._..,I_-_.,,..'--� I,._...--1 '•i i ceara�+p,nan,•"arxl ra�,�rwGi� � o r•. ui �r_T aweenoxuR ocawrc ncQ �) :.-....il �.:...._I O d ?a, ;_.... _. 0 INI( PH E3 - r..nnraNaauUorx,mPs�InN,ua ' W r ...-.•3f1tINAST r 07 L_.1-� e�anxai�* I+nuaweesaazrvx! I .. �� i _ _ GEND ---I --.._'.........._.._..._--- L ................I._.'_ I _ ........._..-- ----......._... �f{ L.OW DENsrry RES.(24 Own) GENERAL COMMERCIAL ....... .... . .... ... I _ a 00 II IfO•:`al .pvky'.; - °' II I j1.. i / /•`� I /C' L�U GENERAL INDUSTRIAL " ��11: 1. �� i � (LOPEN SPACE(PAR) OW1E"as" ourma WOW sANOALwooD qr. — '. � I�'•,, TmAroQlemrTmoarUa. 1::T' iT, zow'18cn - �I,Gif :;�1C�;'J f�lo.9'e4Ja�,�'� j W j l'. I El'aMV.FPaTAU?Vfe �... :.... ....... .,... ....._ _ l) SHEET INDEX ,. SNE UIILDATION MAP ..__........................_:._........._:......._ ..........._.__.._L..... _— -----._. .--._.- I TomEprEiRACfMM _..__._...............................EAST 9'[H STREET - - ... wm Nu+Twa VERSION HISTORY ...._ S. CUT-ML MAP MDRAP XW-W 0. OFfi51,E STORM ORNN ExHiBIT SHEET OF 6 • • TENTATIVE TRACT NO.18976 _,; ... . �....;._..__...._. i 2- i.41;.1:1;�;;: 31 UNITS FOR RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PURPOSESj._ ' .... [_ IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 18,SECTION 9,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH,RANGE 7 WEST,SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN,IN 1' _ _ -•"' CUCAMONGA LANDS.AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS.PAGE 9,IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY - ,t 1 _ ...... _ GNAPFUC SCALE LEGALDESCRIP)NNJ •;r ;,tr)I _ Ss T eo 1M,duaaaU.Rdf4EYiLf•,ssN,n:aI�.L. - 1f.... +, R9crciO EA3 ­Tam Y eAamrw M e w mM a L50.M I17 _f: e_ j'� 1 .-...I (N FEET) eusrte5 aa-+n a sw L4'wm:n Rfa a rg3ot'n.As rR we _ [YET.N0.14NW O.R, _ .__ .................J (il:'T.l10:2+.E°.1L51 _ -- 4 1 OSW-a0 rt. Yrlto Y ew r a eNx na 4 n a[m4>i a of nxn -..._._..._ I ,O.A.RS:4atd'xflF1 .. 165Y0.a a slo Girgr,t6daY U gYa3 �" . REQ *.� 1 saw rue4 a sn 1tt nlln,eaR!nl RR aoae nL nM ! TR:.tA' iPF:iTY R=7. •WL LSi DCNSTTY REP. VICINITY MAP mtaRvx RY3;Y m1 ecu mr Rn1 an o n wY a ............ I .. r•-5pp• �,,y alf'alvlse etc ozY4w twef o vo«e acv Red ne mx acv Y(L IHII t: :. ...; . . YMJr7ltr xen. mpAIafM 11?IY!,IIOQ bnN l;a e¢t rav[AR.,aN MNn qn[I r� - - avian CONTACT INFORMATION Z 1Fir�n x r roar n:.l rm 4sr m rY rm Yz„r;a N[ ; I .. .. - oYlfwafay.ow'w amemooL mwour,an r_ SiRiR CRUI a y♦1 V21eL'9 Lil IY 1Y4 Q d l6x A __..__—.._.___ .._ �I .I • ;�. I ....1 _ - e+e5�*a GniFODe Y1RCFr !'I n SnRntattamaau YRaauv mwew to Ax4a4 I �,��I ,. � O LIN nD SrCAaTewRYN.iixt YO 41nmlel},;M0. :1 ­fA n ti Un6lIQE:l4 aN6 MF 91N Im Yl itla Y M QSi4a a+'L NNNF.MYC 51,111!li r�r 1[R d :1 ' 1 Ex R[SLE4II ......_ I 1. CML dGIECR FgCONNl6l:EWCNn6 MG. 165 i)a rdl Y2 YSr a N Wf a RafMi iNC4t i/SI SMN ....... ..... :.e Ram IQl p rll J1r a 4.Pn :i 1:13[nnbYJ 1 I -' �!a1GW WHOA C,10YN U)O j ;i I 1 I anaamwn"..Ruea>) a W r UTILITY PROVIDERS , z t i � A ;�. W �a5 . ....._..._.... W_Mm ow W � a � � r11omRmun- W N�3nuil! Q:. I '. .__ Crtfa..au5 A 1. ;1 R�.o1Rre 5e O �..� 7 I STONESIDE DR.' ssrna wrx[Ym--- :. eine ancl,,a sw Rim,. I -_— � 8:/J':R. enu sYnxecn. � .iAr�a Ys.mon � U O _ ______________- Fa .77 19,G%:8 IF­ ............:. tl..& N4oZ YO wii NATES Z"a a -� 'I � .a:s. � . .. :sA O:�icdTr its:•.i � o U' .yq r.}ton vm.5ao m mrvn ann teoxxn x mY.c an 1 � 8 � i � I rmss I :, J��; .. N to 459kY1U.M:.F�IOYr Yn,YlaUl a M93 m QV W:IOY , 2323 . � .ao m rex rmYan .. � 1. N.ryp-r. :_......._.-._r I -rnwrta;npYn LEGEND 3' V x ue rp.Ya 'i 1 .o' .d:I ;III LAT i I I LE.I 2987 AC I I I n. m�iL1 n" s. Ysr m Um of, .. I V 1"a rdi.ra i535rr ox.m 1-r-;sa ._.... ........._ ..�. � � ; I' I _ c. rexLe./uf[ i ' 1L/M w�i i M�Yosa 5. fOR STYAM R M'9W6 M41«;o-it Fl w'n1F;1. �7 I I I {.- ._ �Twr IV�Nqr ^aJ an Orn a m f65P551�tcwa.Y nlvna n an N[ ': ��� � wmsra na taasfr o4 r lacwar cstsvn m R mrcr eouowr ! 1 I .5.... ,: rAScgon 6rtlao ltulaf SRf vw3ta a all um tar. .. ... rw5acoaanY ..�.y..,� I rFF reR a Rmffc eYa „Y_uY aSwma � .. .. ....._. _._ 1 ......................__ ._ T.0 Oelwn M �S SALINA'ST. I! s4rl4n ! .._... .,.. _L3—naN ui1 . _............................... ': ��,, ._.__ T --------------------- W W RICHWOOD CT. ! -, i 5 I . I VERSION HISTORY I .. ....................... i F'n 7 LOT fG.L_N.P,i.G UL<..R. ............ SHEET OF r.. TYPICAL SECTION•MADAONE AVENUE a TYPICAL ACCESS DRIVE CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN OIMFRAEVlTVOF dKJ1rOOOLIGRu�NSp�! TENTATIVE TRACT NO.18976 G{lppDTeF0��Aw P LMI FtgNEFA EN[OMI161A61EEMiEE NC 4V -- Y � 9Fa NB 011[Il G[Fitl AAaOxtxEilO 1 IAFN 6IEMIOR IaLEOEA AFFOCNIt$ +�EI,K •tM6.,aniMTONTVENLI,a �- � �, �.1 .' : .. � .. � ,rMp WM[r>!OC S WA19GlEO MFAe MO,IAOI OaYErpYt I - ..... i _ ppp[/O GRAPHIC SCALE • Ex ,xo.ANoxc. q Iti° r r,mTuxemwRlNAuw,aw„meE ... isleNrelme [ [caaeN I RAaral:aFFCY � � �. :...60tlflv)tR m [!l.AO4lGrtiORr I i `.... OLT9nt1I mm.so . ,.r.+-.oLe{ •v'.•TI•rn ... ........._.. .' .. .. .. f _ Y,EIR Nl1YlNRCONIIL[[INEOMIER, EN00WAEl NESOMTES.EEC ,:t :a 1• :y ElFOrRriIY,. FREtltdl ff ! ,'' +4 if' .t _ ' ! S' NaT1ATAL0.Y.. WYnEN1GLM1pmA W f^I -. . ----- ,' ....-......_._-........ .i IINII.Ot1AN[EET. I. ILeTdAO . •, , ' " �'`, n rgA,4•rouy[cARr OOOOII[0! 1' 1Y1tE511 aNlIMrF[VeR dICIY01VIllEY NR1B109iWL! TYPICAISECTION•MADIONEAVENUE rc. devFrinr.:•`. ! sas• a *;r ;:, wun ram�uae ___�._.:..i: ! - �y�' 7 a s�� ,'�S• X� .. aNm[RcaaE4,sanars .. _ ............ v: r.� r./ .•I 1 Y[l,eOx s4aFr a:l... _._. I [ i 1 i, nwn - #..� :.I J4 R � .. 1 16. ,. .. � �1 rApo.NTi� '' � vu r.x... -..................�.� I I v .... ..._ .._ . ..'l e.,a.�• ',...w �. 1 rr•oo � Wmly raaa (�o - 1 W r .: I 20 19 IAP .' • •, �... t4 V. 31 I 1 k ROTNaM NM11v10,t[l•AT EIEVArIaIIVEM1 ' Z' 3aO 4 . l _ l �/J [ tryn[a r!pp �T- ` - _ „ID,. I Ic 'xa:M.S R4 U to K Vr u.�v�i a STONESIDE DR. i T .:,�r•.�_ �L1iF;:u� ! O T 'r 4` .a �" ..,'•1G IT•CTA . _'. ;.._�r..„P_�•cnn w'f - - - - - -_.1.18•- r Z II si .. Z -u. �•..srs,+,[ n -31v.T,Fx+,;T+a : s .. 1. 0 vl 'aw,rvn!•Ir+!'n:x �� .P ! K 19' ;, 21 � 22 � .., rr3iOE« '.:29 Pq;.. !� -�- I ri 'SSi5}r � •- tLL'rATNFa[ARTFrxrxorR uvAnavca I1 rraTsrm 1 rm�w ! b T U's,rr,-r,+� . ,. b BOIMOryn I �.. :Ic�."t � :;. trarueu[rn�ooruulo ..„[._ ...•w, .. ���mV 6FET1FTtrt �' Jr... r/::�, , , i km.n .. _. 110N IIF. .. . vROP.orncA s 'i a E - •.._-•-•±•-•¢",F[LTIa MtLYR I ;IrL I� MIL .. r ._ i _ F Y Y S a � -� �2� 7a,5 2 27 28 I � !�L � ...-._-.__......._ vAoci - - Har ra<r�R4 v;� :..:: ._._.._.. �. . .1 •! f �.\< . ` r n 3 is SAUNA i }E••,In !cEa.0 .. ... aameui> ." E. is- [ 0 a.N:C4Y1- va3ar +�1'• I 4`ya F_A FRtEW[ _c ':/�, ;•...:I a n i.:ra irLnaI OONElT F0,10a,r[,[VAiONNEN ! : i .. I. ui I ; { 1 rrn rsF 5 X10:_ �R fr - ...... ,:ar..,:.,.,.r_, -. ;.'- 1\•- .. . LEGEND tECIOMeE01,Ne FlErAT,ONNEA ..__.... ..__.__.._. ,\ ,• •.¢' /' Y..I• _— - - -....... _._RICH WOOD CT.- 1 T,acl eaROAR .Ilm auamtr_ n rtar las U _.. M .—WAIN ^� FNYIIWEl ., I I IM IK'�•�E V RnaN,[n �• .. NIOP:iriv ��Y•. c.a aNF[FR,N M"FU wA P, 1 f..'� '. Vic: T�o, E EOv. Mm o,wvonn VERSION HISTOR __....... _..... t.,= rut•�. : i v. ....rmsxcRAOE .--rtrlalquce t4 T,al f 00.41 E A}I Ea MINIAAR,O , , Cl - (/A IT. / -.`_- _•-"wL1QarRFMCN�, ;•::.-. Itr Bi) Doom� lllatp, IIJI L. SHEET OF ....;_w+wvcc .••'.._.........-. ...... �el°�"ralRaoro oowo moi.•-mr, rIa900oNao 1 i o paymn5. -2 Ivu•+,nT.i,s..-.� I... i ! ! i __._..,•rnuvRnRou, � ''.I f� � -s n sssssw vL: . a ..F. .-p ' I TVAAPIFU r[m FFRAr, VAIpI _ J(NVI A:: rix[ 4_.,� A., <. '!�-}• IIrONIa]INOMEN anAN MEraIM IWAw -q s1A[[IWQ r RITFAFASRIO EIOIW D0.TN A4 1 FTM[GT ArYIO:G 3 V $= f=,•Taaaorc�avAa[osaLi,oN a, "7,R"" ° INFILTRATION TRENCH DETAILS E.M� � • SITE AND DRAINAGE PLAN x TENTATIVE TRACT NO.18976 �� e _ .... ...:. PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN ........_.. M"Wr „TENr♦EInREEr GSAPHIC SCALE oLYEGLVE r I ._.__..._..._ ... :..�..� � r� I I'' � nRL ETIi•aW. [M:EMA,FA9FOCMlE.wP. E® Q � II , ..._.... i I !_.. UE�ea•nn (w EEE 1 1 INM Re n. .. .:.._........ I I YOE L l•m _.._...... I A V.T.3.iK'sE.ATE _�EYP nV.'ta',E ENA•EgA u/l1E••sEY1LNR. WOMP BMP MAINTENANCE I i N nEilrl, A ( ) r. iseEa RaliAi'0e MVR,EufM •'CI d•R RG M ®ace 11EF. BESCRWT!OA TASK I SCHEDULE I B1' -eRllnma�fel AFT I; I (" eO1eobE�A t+as�N'lelNll[m CgaaX gRle. 1 I I I pp�Ypipy lEUU40PEBD,UAe ❑A INFlITRARRN TRENfII W-ECT/CL GLIARTFRtY NCA I atT+.EvI Z ECiM"+1 I •20' Mm To N I UlIP'"E I� 1 AommlI I► /i' RAKFW ! f, '. 20 9 1-61 6 X97 '18( 15, t I i _ I .-- ErvEEsoruTEn Evc ___.__ Z Q �• �' cuYrwvE W ., r......._ '•L3 1 rn U IPERFRRA1roXl UnnM .. ..� ,� O STONESIDEDR. .rmre�- �._Y wwvEBwEmLmArt � . : .'. � �•.5,i ,rmx Ra.roU•rtN ..... ......... ............ I Ir a, •1., _ \c 'LAI.3FM'511911 -_ : r L� rl I O O fa,EX TMIrLG W "-;( 1 I A LGYC.IETl1'n.81 Ti O ttcnoX Ercw Z I •I I\ _ ._.. - .... ..._ .-. _ 12 - rt ....nNrsu BRfae .....1................ .. - -- - - - -'- - ------ to ,.x-.a_::_.¢fr_..._... .LIVER FtaYP:g pra♦vr. � - 31 .: V) Al� O 21 22 �0 �29 �� N.NEF Et,h l� ,Er PERHNutEn Pvc . LU lea ..� ...�'♦.Yr, E - :wMlfn, I aft lcn,E„wLErwnr,m.rFAR .......... ...•...-! e.cuneaoYrtER_ i •4 __ IAT.aF'Basltar �----.. erUlY tgaq WE 1173F:A.9TT9 FJL,TnrER" ... ® INFILIPATNW IFIEIICN O6,aJ_ � IRfer l:W.ngn j�♦� ` �\ � �-Ci - _ 1•10 _...... HE Nlp cwr i(:'/--.-J 7 n'A,ER WunT.•vl .__•.._ :._•_. _ 3C I !' Ir L.r YE„ '^ L• R]%BFLY'A110!!� 23 ..24 25 I F26 27 .l I 28 — I .. I _ ! _. ..,.I• MLy `I • 19._... •r¢Sa1 W i f. 00 SALINAST' 'I j qI '' ._ r1 sc:ENrl'aBT I 1:, ..........:-.................... .....E..........�._. i .i B ' I LLl.]f'tr'S750y! ... TYPMOL BURDNC BRACING Fa SwA,ll/' , i .:•' - A 1 G.11 r"".B3W i .......... ........-.. ''nn v .i _ J ,228 SF i (� ; I I � II 1 77 F — — +\c _ W I 4 5 .8 -- - ----- — 1 , 1 I .... . 11_ L ERG NELdD .................................SOURCE CONTROL BMP LEGEND -_:.-_RICHWOOD.0 I LEs fLU Z- I A m FRc..Lvr-ena .. 1 •!•: W. rt1v LpE E4"EI faw Nt EN:JYm bPrtpvryE)dAA Tvv:b eeq Omipvesm B�raea'a BMP. _ I FI IAT.3F'CS'S1.SB1! (rerbFeT fa[X SU• Mnnn.rnai NroP-LS ms 1 6N GGK ESM X] ACl/Ia frLiidaA I LG`.:.IIT37'01.95Y N] Wd-MM .AF BWF I i '"'�'" I 1 1 1c. N) cwv'aen VERSION HISTORY H4 BNPeblrs:gc. I I na Fm a Rn.a cuL I I ! 1 n Z AT F1.1.c0 Nl L•m,YVtlq O,•lTY Q3nAnn •^= ..-.:•..... 1 —uo---a",- 97.61 RaJJ6 1.?^CSE am" NEI U•YAD•fh Capel PAyrR I � i � I I 19r6,) taAr�n6,•B GnYw 1.KT 611.KYM NU EapbPm Trei:Yq L.T ms NN C•1pl B•Yn Meg6on R•pan � I� � �� I ( —¢YM-rr-WT NM ve &m rpH9eFPIMeSi U.roPYMNLaY _ .__ I I `-_ •� OaA-er of e,Eal SHEET OF xEr CarpY qRE eaeeEq rppYYer NPDE9 F•mA• �. I' •. I_.... I I ®F nue! : EUNRi.ARa 1 I UD 4 B, vA,M•1m6n:Xsh aF:rA recRFa•m Ellrw• ..... .. � Ta w.'le`<mv1pp°.FNmnL b'1 Uv•3rLA YrtgElaE•EYA•irmm�P.EregR Eevr mrsErrlc:l gnvl A•hRMA vM•OYrEa C6reA1 $DENY v�v DY'-MIRcnR1 1WE1UE -FAXYLNI JUNE 2014 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 1 LOT 4 OeE:�:M1IOLR EtSVN°p°Dfwaaama sir�wc+Gao teoaz�mvEr APN207-262-201,-202,-203 TENTATIVE TRACT NO.18976 3.208 ACRES(GROSS) "W"' naa a,w 2.967 ACRES(NET) cwt nwtar:r, ENfA,P:W aartxv+ea[rr_ � '-' �,, - 'E CUT—FILL EXHIBIT _.................:....... ..aa HEM —teas+sa.wxrurfw+amc.fw ...... •.._ i. I / _ ., m ir t[1wrJrrtEl„,ceauta+stc,wNrrywa.rcxnrvluEawtcrrm.�as°arsirrscencrNrnfav°wvr ewrltauagtm�ea _.._........�..'�...-.. ...._.....;.1:�•;"� . ..-............ so II ..._.... ' .,.�... eatx iAa1G1W,.iEsmawoE uAnaxurro0umi ta iaGRAPHIC SCALE x�ac:wX.Wm• rr a0 o t,.:aon. .;+.•ws:v-r�N � � i-; � � � �� -vtunrfENEvfrtcttxucratwrow,ixw wsEoue+Es. ti •:� ,_= T �+ � ... 1 � E�mu'ltt,. Wv�xMc�wn t;' , •, : l; INI1CW.d1a.., EOUaEh-'lW6QIpM0,8 �T ........._.._..... I 1 xi �N..... TTPIEAE SECTION—MADNDNI AVENUE phi, ' _a G iC•. �:. wfery: rere �ex,E . '{' 4:' Son•v' ji4 tJ' MJ ,ly' Ufw119lrlteCMCa ,E .:%I ,. �� F -_�'! 11.i_ re;v.. _ ,t'�- 1 '•��i NYrn1ECN .r:: at°.OileO r t� tatplR _ I ilr. tr1.a 20N `O �_-��---�------ -' .: I ,�.: .lI �, M•A �• �y V' �� •�1 �1.Iry e'! liayr(t'� �_ ....tr ._.\ I. , .20 �,t.'19` 19• tr I rn - = L----- "fti.; ,.� <,_ - r • y�y] ': ,�:_. •, f 11 _ I g6:kl� �1' _ � ''\ -.. ;`I .- :sfa:v,r(.' W n`" 41 cc,waaw ffvntfa°umrwE rfE,ataat va,r i _`�'• (� ,; ;, J .Iy-, .._ I . ._.�_. FT rS!"`YSi Ij X11• iet ffrry. J 0 �s STONE91DEDR. <�, : t tea»" `"� �= - "' f' 1R a t m _. tr. _..t.. ......__ a...:..: • 0. Lu 99 st — lrpy '`.s��.r.�: 4� E.l>'k'r,l ,t._— . ! — �rry_.. I cl (•.1!!a`�I to 17 t. Ir ..... N .rtt ANII•+a•�,.LYX ir.t•y ilt': ri' 1 '.:� tl t: �I fp..� I�O.t � a�'�6 ..� �.�t::.:........ .:•`, .i'F,,[6,-'3"'+�}'1'� 1a rT',a1wMrJN+aC:. [IEFAnW YE.W � �:�,'. •:: "��. m dll,' .,I %°m• {� _ +RKlaOlryJl�:l •+- 1 b, V1 r' T t �'L 2. - 1 t ',� k !• .;� Dr-TA ul4�.Q°LIL f _ � sX,l t:r♦e.`a" _�,' ° _ t:�.�.f -tea:i*�'y'1• `}y.•;f, :�`N`:`���..•�•; �,� 2 Z.""f ��Ayp.6p,YtlaR ` C%N'.\1E11 s' ........... ._ tuft•. 'Eat ��aa �q:tq b - :�"'- ;-Stt„w.*n.ry •. ..',' 'i�, aF _g -�,1 ly'- DB F __iR' ;= _ _ 't j 1 i 1'I+u' elm • Fr ko4r ir•tiM t rtr'E/ly � I r t° j��ria SALINA ST: 1 1 t . ra:.tEi sansj ..__,......................:::..:....._..._. t- � �,'.d': 1 r' _ �'�•,-t'�x --_ .}� .I^ j .. .f: x U`rt42Er 1 :a.. � �.wa � .twt `_s� I�� 1 •'S-'_ __ ���s_____ _ {�: /� ,,9Q7 Ie..,:cr.,..l. rrt�'-._._r.._.. i-3?.'^� .. t I - _ - � •�•��y�t rr8at} .1.4;.�_.r ... - E,j�W ElcnoxEaatertataaoafnEwiraXVEw I , -ti ..� _J W J-A � r ._........�:_ ::r�-vra::E-N•r __.._...._. rinial r rr j 7. 1. ' — .,, :, M i � ..�rt t ar rte i.Ma t� _ _ _ •�r�e nm� .•✓k --_. - - --._ .-. Lu 0 r i .................. ..., :. t ...• - � ': .'.w nwra•f•, .i Atue��cs.- _ _—��--^=--_� � LEGENDnos Em W V rFC1aMEEMNE ELLVa 1• ?�J. _ -`.� _.._ ir, rrrptr r 1 o r' .o-• r'. .:Q.�, .R• .`-eJ�.yi'. �',L � -=i---..__,._._1--'--�--"'-----1-r tma .. RICKWOOD C.T... .,.' `' t rwtEEawmwv riga.CMesae+ .,.:; rc rr'am taurx .� - .•• 1 ,YgtaEC�(T�OI W� µ fFNE E.Fwt ::tyr.'.-�---CT.Y..._—._ _ i ' � tn�_^Gq N10.YlLltr _ 1'I.roa.IYNP I (••�.i\ tM-ai O r. , 1.,:-_::-�_ I ':,:•:. :• �. E1tl°SCttn apai�•rgMftLE '---- ._._. ..� � VERSION HISTORY s'rcicvrs,mweetevrla,vart t•+fxvuEwn„ �. � �.:�� •v / .._ - .. — .., ..: �. .' � � I � ,ram rEuwc m • � � ar�M1ot�OfroX q �Baaay. e _ amia a[�rEof ... : .,_ ei__ t resoa rafeuov°a i �- '..,; SHEET OF ... __.......... tt�sme+aEEs •'. .: '�1� , �- ..•cwtuavitoar�� t rr.. fa._...__. ,4i4 tl:+, '__� t*n:m:aoroa.w_n.-w�a_n_r...a-.c.n.r.n_f.f....{:v'=-::. -` ��FfI^�M:�`�,:a.'•.�.4s:�tJ1R'.,,��.gr��.E.C.,'Av t^6"Lt�m�'�" ��• ' L. nff rznr.e aierx \9mM1a:mwMttatiaMtwifef M --s ,C. - FEta[E V INFILTRATION TRENCH DEW y -wuIRA,. rASF,YhT OFF-SITE DRAINAGE EXHIBIT TENTATIVE TRACT NO.18976al, , e , E g1MWGENL0fYl1'daCe,VrmpGOnrMAigN OLO e.EEfUmU�[E Ir:4EA dIXMtl,WTIO Efve qN, ean�+ea GRAPHIC SCALE creGrNce+caG ogwrnslswcw,cl.vq. Q u so eo eeMmUSW W/GE PiMagN�1WOUW GI+iP (N rE[,I MRW 6YEE a vweesv.e ,uae WOEvs�tlm pool ewesxW+Ee.ne ENGOWASS ASSO TES.Sq i�MfRlr 1T, rnsamm nom+ "asaae°0E . eau ENaxEER Gm eurgwc. ..1QF�'7�.�n. i �n0eeniGlJU q�Q( -N 6W,E , __ o� , L , , r. 1 L ----------- ---------- I. .: p W q Si fc- ,awo,w w O WMr.waue+we I I U�q �w pia„' raeeENr vnar.u•acr..l �I' + O. W Q m,Nr�naE oval - ( OLU V WO O UZ v in(7 U Of I I c. II .i Y' .' ^ _ I Ji I I00 lV Ld I 6 •. i................... ..................... ...........................I...._........_......_....._....—�+:_. .`• LEGEND Z W ILL MP rNl+,VQ w.Weal r3. rHSM 4.WXE O T.. 1 Enr T.C. r10'irc°ir w.'tvxrVERSION HISTORY me hlr er naw+v rNs n ra a rmnq ,fee 97.6'^MWJM aemvs : rEra,n rvan¢a ttEvuq, (9,.11( MJIFS UN11G OFNIeE, -m BOUNGNir Eer:g4-.n1 orae SHEET OF oe� raoresm smEn nrzEs 6 6 .r..9K-LtfEl'iMelal NfltM Z l H-0 Wall �a I `7 1 q aee -n j ,e I rn rn rl F WI c I " ; N CA I 1 " I A 1 1rn j l I I �> rl. v� I I I eN 5 to II i � I I' - I I •� I I r I = rn -M- A6 --- � p OIC TI O m OI s s s - i p i _.......... ................. .._. a, — .� a — � I a Oat ! — �� � �� I � E` �lky r■n:arzrz: osom��s.._.. ••• s � Hl !1 iT'9 Id a 8'= 9i iai888?83it [88885&E8l, 1 !&3&Ee.a�' 9 � fl I '3 6ti8'�rE�d'a _!ifl =M`:8�1@flKE EE.� Sd E8 Ei!EE , o � ■ i AZA 3.g on 66■sa'aa'iea areaarrees raaraces" � $ 4 .3 i133'663s..19# 8:'.,9:::1:9 135 13:'iN f, H� �`� ilE z• �•�---•�-.a caaa csa as.asa � .F7 PF OS w �aA Q ° a�aaa rL .........�. ...:':'.:'...�: ..�.. S� � : d..n" T .. _M. fa l 6'6f i 99 i[3'�I{ I i '•6 IiGSf: ••6'6SS68"•- CZa."-a"a'= f +� 8+ m c (c� �3� Shadow Ridge - Tract 18976 - Madrone Ave ® Crestwood Communities .. 7 61a W.Nw Eata9w",C4mmR G 91Ne O�616.914196 Pae(676)]iS677■ Crestwood Communities PWk1.Ola Pedes M-%y }\� (� 4,:���,T,�a�atna�i � •s OFi • � Fd�'•�—�j"�-T .` _■ rl' - t ��L4 h3 b..t{ �I����a-s�iZr�A.v�••�.it�T ��I�'� M. '+SST `ry`.��•� WOL ��%Ii euat Pi/ ■!*mss: ���`� Q� ,�► NNE a//;r� - ,7� -����lar � :tth, _- , reit..�r��w � �'�"�!1•�ti►' 0 IN @ I% ��►i O ��I��i'/�■y�,�Gy.-�rrA' � ���LV n—eari•••a��L-�: �i� ' •• lA 0 �b _ � a' a„ti.�_.,n.�h�� L•i�� tu� itS����' ���[�I4ey. ata��'. I'��� n ■a inti, ,'~ . �•� ��c = � • m al �r .'4• � j ria ♦�lI•��/ya��-• sl�°1,��'�L�.pp c_�A1 ■`F�@I 11 i - Yui�`ir�i6s�i�� �°a#{»na•i�i'rl'lirt" �,ciZQ� airii�:�Ai, ••3jd�" tili FttS . r ,�j���i�l`I _`i`I_•_� _���E. .a i_ _ • qui i-•� c 11..�.,."��I-•�I pII� n ,`Ci%�. �s'Io•I o•I ��J r 11!w�'I��':I�� 9�laEe�'����I���'` J:r�I�I,;:Ii'�I��P!yI!I Y IIIIwI' tri/��►1 ��,���� gill g? �� � Ss�?.� _��I�IS _.'♦ �!� Ii.L; e:'` I r��:Ili Ii.I 45 Ow, , _— I� ti r rk�.4�+� I � ate ri.D a ►s!I r 1,14 � _➢ Ao✓i did �� ^,, t yg kr d �I r�_ �rJs✓��a�i ✓ r� ��® S�r�✓' !�iti.l c`�ir�ir�✓r�Si�p i�� �I i.�i __ - • G �rre�✓✓ I �w�l a✓�i3✓i`ri ✓r°� � ' l.I�jA ��� ,Qe �fL �a� ��' a�i�✓�r�e tri' ori�.�f��iy�r ter' �I 1'�� R g°ve�ai��' • �O��u� z- i '' yi��7� 11/��� �1,•� ill����G�''��\v"i>'�u_ i' yq'%��`` `�✓���`���''ll !`,/-" ��y✓i�e�@� :c[ _.... •. • '���� ► oil ��► .. �� 1�}] r I{rv� I�r�✓, r .6 ��; � �4✓ �✓�r�B� .Yeti— WIF D�(, ��S INI� ,/ (� ��ry�I♦i ;i� vil.�a.�a�'. r�P1ii,�r, olq ✓,. iI :_ MIR 1.��j['f�®® ����_��►1�` _!. 1 saS� � _!./B%i��Gi � .Ik• 'I:' ►111 ����� Ysc'aPlmreMJerfYNLf-,rr.clL � ���: •� ��1�j cuss eaoervs sTi-Icmrr rieq C f+ �8 O swce�nen iJer'+�sn.eav'I n •CeYemlfYeN'.Wr .�� ��� U a� 24 23 22 1 GMAGE CAMEGAMGE PLAN A PLAN 1 ITO. PLAN 3 379N rfi;19RYD lL�Oer-VE KtHf IF rMIC<d/ awe.re asaw w.es.e aw.vo�o.rnw � ' ne n,'u.oeeeEv roar.LFA•rrrrrY. — E{ [[5�� — 'e- fATy — MOON Y00.1 STOMGE e.uesenrLeelnav t' � G �_1' anlieaw c0.^wnw fD s•-�•-4.erwVw eor.•®I.w;s=nerr __ — /FgESARav elE.�w-nnwAgEeEnw y/ LM wets sYYL lP rl.rneErilseeaTc neaaez/ra uwvsr•ereeLwav amaaaes YM I IMgeL/19]V U�rrTY.eL IIWJtJ-MM-rbYana: J'.'�•eL IIY/'KlCMreaaor eawr V e . .,Y yen r+wlr�w•J reera.re lrm 00 r[aEleel•/b•2 ITK.1L OAOIRLOB-I �tll[ArI MYCIL.F- P. I -ALL }- W POOL i 6aErt4R ILMY-lrIIGIe V }/ PJlLOMOliMInlS lfv/!Pq LtTGmIB eeaeww }� belEr7El Fae RL!•lnr4V(O!-IfPCAt i� i c O AYMeL 4sIr CG.NA•T P.rNO•M LP.C�I£G4 - - - � U .-NGEY.g2.rM1E lCL1ll K1 NI6i®PMIrF.W 41 '. '... •.. ..� _ r r• 3 O FT, ee)I rIm IIaLIAIRee KAEl14WaIr(ro OeM/JLLEDYMWG6lg1.IPJ/'rrll ree.( �.�.O.r.� s•o•rwu rltcu.ea�rwwtwrr ue YYLLs ewes ee rwnrraeea•L¢mr Yrlll r4/glLYLTJ u�rrne;.Y. 1M Preliminary iw/,Ecaewamrrsil ata.enmo naJr..al ravrnr ravcv nnr.Y eyrsnw.rreLlersnsavcvma�nL•vLE ..aro•mn•eer-Jrl.susewouLlvrr,. Pool Tot /r<.erucnLeas s•Ecnel rms wLI ree o IrPeea�n ralwnanrwe Jeurev Lot Plan .alerv/.L„-,.YR .resrrv.n� LYW!!/FO MRAae6'YItt LYtiKtl lLii:l.'! IAfeIYY•rM4'-MAeIlN nee.H'eM Ile£./LL.a•64LOY.We-AE.1.4tI GYw!l) •O MLLLPO-ML AYerA' Da .Pi Pax.ISlwewo+..s PREPARED 8y: 00-2-14 rv�sars ot•rw..L�I.r.nr.Y ...n..•e r.•....s.. e..nra T womu:e:a-sr._esn r..:pzo nsala nrv.Y1.ewc uneYY:.A.ds.Y 10 YiLLf•lef:.4 (R.12-01-14) r-e•Rcie nnaaa ers>:a,�rsna�vws y S 1t acGlrAav rrnru la>f+/ro nsr.usslrrcaa a •e{ s !W//L IQA)1lT Nrtl 0O)rPNQ/s i1 J3 g gall, 20 ° N : ° ...I ° I I FII 1 x 1a_ 114 20 19 18 17 e 16 15 17 I """ ; 3 _I 3 )MAN3 AN MxR MAN x 3 PIAN 3 MAN xR I 16 O I I ' _ I -- -- -- 1' -- -- -- I 15_ 1 31 GJ _ r 3 i �•/ 3 I ,V ° 24 23 22 21 I 112 3 I 21 3 22 4 31 30 3 29 MAN 9•''� 3 Ftm I MAN 3 MAN: /��� MAN3 ' 3 3 V) I 1 MAN xR /y� I 7�'7--T Wx l4A _ • 3 R �� R3• ® �— ..--�5 �1 ->Tr_ '1/RW/IaVC/�l�SEAT h7 BAFFrB G �1 1 � 3 WALL CONSTRUCTION LEGEND 1 E re•sxa)teuav/rlxR rrc+smrwe.:a taarerrnrctAHil/rona acv+rta;nauc----- rRsem.out./tr.uu)esn•sa.mrenxeeam xle;rs Q!W)t>.'M]/IM elrxe t>•O/IE•llTr I O R � p�n o,:erune�e.mec v Ric n�i• O leiP rasa IlaacaeerEa/+<3+elReavaA/a ro tvzwa.eelo et)Nla•[ua A![l/1e.1 IRCCOGYlOr roxr � , 1 mxlrKamwnraveBwtaAererK rr3w ..KKixw�ea/Aarseacruaa xdlrmw wRRR®w)nl we.ae.dx � V lAaeEHI/rr'K:4 aAwr ra®ru•/t1'rNx rerv/•wr•IecrRxaY/Llwrle[wx txlt•N/ Qnwawrr;a+xuwv;va[aaenue rr ne rru twua lVQMA /aaroauarnarrralvmruer.r///aa llm•IRIWr1lXrA'2•b 0 i Atuaesnm au)r n•/mcucaae los/bro/emumuauR/war/eRs+rwet wARar/r Am/ae+m arcs na xaae/rx ` Al/!1M•xlr N/)XCR/R•AOMCMp//rt/CNRt•/vNravr vwr/+s+'r (J o . / —�—/f1lO/PrrYalRO/ RIV PIgtlKNatMJtfrl6clz•x{bRRL!/GiCR/nCcnlstivMOOx) O M��ML�R�RR�IINNWTMILD')��Ivl¢�VtaLR o Asp/b1+1br.Wam/DR YIRM/IpCIO!)[wwbrM llkYl4pA � . --rwnaa/w)wu r-v a4/I1a X/✓Xa•evK '?.. - ItI/lY/rWIXtlNIIJ?L AaxMt 11lOLMAYAa! dLL n! ^�^,, .��.�:.t'.:v �`.•r: v :.)!s,� © �tiN4rp�INWIW]YN'dC3arCrL AOfrbtYollr'ra l[[s[ Vd W .-�.tp .7:d':t,�:t-.'�•. 1•:•�'ISN n.;c. rrwa//rarta/uRv fn— raeo tars.3A `ar uu:st/carr/ve/aw-wwowwnaacir:a./3rtvrxrsrry .•'!. .:v,•.'.i:�i•• l.'•V:� ,vfa.\ NILLb FMW fO. � M�nd�ll�/A��LxaR1A�IMaa ,t�•;'n :Ml:,•','I�l•�, •• �••:•- AARa96/M yr.LLlrCx/./xOrbfl)X 4•`r.j:.. .1-v i+ :��+} rta'//6rRI Fib/pitM•At/•IrrWIANa•R•Y/a!/A`/t ATN7MtMIKs/ TNr O !CHUM r SMI:LrG. //[Na YrIO/MW�b/MKM INIRVr /OMY'Mes'r t[IH aro//AArAWrffllrRLMIiaARs•MR ADIUtro pr4/xwIMAMM/A4IIKN lrislAS u/rwR:o•r[MXrxrwr:awarrua bA)rtwN1LKE nrava Wall Plan O /vlXl AtrlA•IL.Irp/0/llriV•Y Ul xmawrw.'+aer11/iPO PO rYa PNrALiR brMA'aI Rl MbR'fSD/'GIrI rl,pr4tA.3VlMAla OWMY b Court Yard Wall Elevation � � AR•/r�ralRw . /yraL/MKNrrl4srgOr•s••alaarta%Mrrau4x aMr4Y rsr (1� °8-tbl� 2 Q plCr4rXtKMfr'f�41ORfM Of/RYVEi PHIL�IMICRLRIAO'O ASR;rbsl Ae/KtaRCNIM/IR/A#I/Rrl:M4 NAbIM %� RIIMINtt ' A>�rNl gr/Rl r3xxdxaarOlX C,� V'NAWr%RQfY/I/II I(/tJYt II.0.arll/tKir•Wt MOlLL Cf ''�� • © :[a{M/0603K'/r/l AOA•alm KtlW qs KVM/R'YErKLK/dRfN M11.4.rr/s[3 gna7ea bMll seMWRD roMIRiI IIs nYVrtYCfMrOtRlr ttpL;6p/btsral xaX gl•Illxbr IIaIAsr Y+tls 1/IPS r-Y ' IRev Ix-0r:1Q J'-O'imt ILQIM/�E[1£giJ/A,aVW!! .� �x.rAa+rrn-.¢�w ro nE elwrse/w�. / elnreavlaa/rae srxe c'au2svrLP MAMA&AS eS�ER ro gA ers nof 5 r O I x z s : x 13 I 10 U s RANx I I I I I 12 i 23 ) 24 25 26 27 28 j 11 I e , MN) PIAN 2A .J. "NZ MN 1 R PIAN x0. j To —— I 9 - NI -.................. I I I N 7 ) 9 I ! 1 1 6 7 2 Z _— CD !, I2 3 4 5 6 5 I i 1 IIAN x0. 3 PUN 3A PUN 7 I MN 2A 7 MH) ) MN 2 ! 4 I ie 7 i LO 3 I I MN I 2coIr. i I ' :3 J WALL CONSTRUCTION LEGEND E /re ram nev4aas.lr Jeae/rnrl.'a.nr ro-- �rorleLJn WHIT cnww,e recti raw /C1KlN h'1 La! �R�COt/'-IO KRYr !v0'GDl RN4IV I1OZ Ral/neavbnNirvmanCM4Ti/V.•uInnvw/n �P�L cn O aMeldAmra[/rstx axln:N n'nrK a/Jl1ero 0F/recM4l w/U/IrX f1!✓I/AiVIG7a!NH DrrfE 041a184K/l U a®/N4-J'/'/lK Kd/I saYNPEC/1bVCCN�Cl/Q/IOCaW l..MA _ aelazvma�R eecx� �r n�eaiae°P/rm ri`ua°ne vwrs'�xNao ro w/ '� /1/1ew°aialem®B�q 4C/aLW�d iGlslWm%4/KMIneCRIPIL li O R111eVAr NllWlgP>AX V/A9 RRgTronT,�LM0m�eI•I'I•KGx'rN'IXJ.tY O /ROr/t1VaYMaAIe QLVCa14l IV/'1@CYW .=MA= Yr/.iln:W4 CYJnY� 3O. alglst/ntaleL M/.I TIMAVLaYI ivc�ro na we r/i. isa/"roiJ1d+wMrnwi.wswz ro/Isa.vw Q 3 nla/ua X..sXwre/rK ice-[ ••-n•KRvn nw Raaale/.aLrars:w n<axnereNw/Wea.'nr<a ne O11QW IrLa PGCJIPY/Od1aJIGf/RN a IQl/[1CM bMta �tA,�ILIK IN'rLA}NYQGulaWt AH6fromu4MKO/ V/ JaI'INL/nIINWYrG/A-O'JCtlal ruJCMrIYIJT OMiaY fLY � ` OCaI.nar rLLYTINY.[KP1TnTItA4PInCm a/� P 1 :VC.aiOnlq W fwd Kt�i[/nOLnIM[weKtl11'Y V/ V ' RMrnW Ag4e/lQI Mt' MLEa liM OCIYYNrIV/O MI{.Wl nlmr//+L/O M 0'r C' Jtf1NI1L'M Oi Y.Pe4MI/RQ.Ie4.-n1r IM[L NIANrm rorYP'y MJOJr reaeau+v na.recran wl/,.win/wronlvae0oim Ivrnro a>�x.sxlp.ronNalNx e+ane nsrrww'srnararlaxw.Qear.lu<ro�aNNr..a nLrnrt< p NM�w� n.wr�fir/d�o�L ro Wall Plan neaNsn/a tie.raaea ar naes°.a1ePr.nro Nr AenYunurmn,.lelu. roAenew.rlollx.0 N31[Y1 OrMAaRrraI/21e-a•wvawHaaaVer Neas.'JrmMs+w rlV 0Na gaT1y[NNaI[JaPrrP +uoln Mlrunn.wal[Ameal ae[w/ia¢O 0&12.14 !w>[N.eo/ro rKA/rleelrKNaerl4saaP/nYA:Meae w+N.aJn 1m4YJars keNax�sxaarsrx �,.,, ' wuw/rm.eencw rK rameecKwwKt rur4ea ns � AY[W MH 2N�VfaJep.YJl194[eY nalCar.•x T/n,r[H/rw R,W 1 2 Ya1L•Ileo i•_p• (Ree 12-01.14) h a MASONRY BLOCK PILASTER with TAN PRECISION BLOCK WALL CAP and STUCCO FINISH AT THE PROPERTY LINE INTERSECTION OF THE W RETURN WALLS-TYPICAL o � PLAN 1 -B Elevation PLAN 3-C Elevation PLAN 2-A Elevation U v g� F ' y i L� - i-.`'�- � • ( •atm . ........... ..... • y ie. - 1AMIN 1, ` 00MILL c SCA E:1/4"-- I'-W 1 E 1 BENCH FOR PEDESTRIANS 6'-0'SIGN BLOCK WA BLOCK-RETURN RETU C WALL with TAN Q� PRECISION BLOCK WALL CAP,STUCCO FINISH and � 0 TUBULARSTEELSIDEVARO GATE U 3'-0•WIDE TUBULAR STEEL PEDESTRIAN GATE PER ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION STYLE MASONRY BLOCK PILASTER with TAN PRECISION BLOCK 0 WALL CAP and STUCCO FINISH ON EACH SIDE OF THE 0 TUBULAR STEEL COURT YARD GATE 0 -MASONRY BLOCK PILASTER with TAN PRECISION BLOCK WALL CAP and STUCCO FINISH ON EACH SIDE OF THE DECORATIVE PASEO LIGHT FIXTURE and POLE (ts TUBULAR STEEL COURT YARD GATE L U T-6-TALL'TAN PRECISION PRIVATE COURT YARD .pASEO LANDSCAPING CONSISTING Of ACCENT WALL STUCCO FINISH and TAN PRECISION WALL CAP TREES,SHRUBS,GROUND COVERS and VINES Preliminary , Paseo Architectural Paseo Architectural Elevations - Typical Scene �r ae,a,e earn xw 1 � V-A'TALL WSONRY BLOCK SQUARE FNASTER 3'-0'WIDE SIDE YARD TUBULAR STEEL PEDESTRIAN ON 6'-4 TALL MASONRY ROCK RETURN NM STUCCO FINISH AT TETE RETURN WALLS GATEPAM OBSCUR NG METAL NEVI SCREEN-TYPKAL WALLS WAh STUCCO FNSN-TYPICAL FAOPERW LINE WTEREEMENE-TYRAL /, T-0-WIDE MATE COURT YARD TUBULAR STEEL 1'-0'BIDE PRIVATE COURT YARD TUBULAR DECORATIVE WOOD RNUM ON 3'-6'TAIL MASONRY RLIICK RUVATE DECORATNE TUBULAR STEEL RAIUNG aM A E PEDESTRIAN GTE FDR RAN)ELEVAIKIN A STEEL RDESTIUAN GTE TO WTCR THE WODD THE PUN 1 I ELEVATION COURT YAAD WALL WTI STUCCO RNLI GIE ON'THE PIAN 3 C ELEVATION VI BOWL ON TILE RAN S I ELEVATpN EY PILASTER ON DITEE %X OF THE PROPOSED PEDESTRIANGTE AR OOIGT[D PLAN 3-A Elevatiop,: ` l�`'ad PLAN 3-8 Elevation PLAN 3-C Eleva_tlon AT` ' TIlJ 11 ILII.!I _t I0IJ LO 00 tA 11,E],T-1i - ` Cn M1.� - {•.• ^ O 3'-6"TALL MASONRY BLOCK PRIVATE DECORATIVE WOOD RAILING ON THE yl T-0"WIDE PRIVATE COURT YARD COURT YARD WALL WITH STUCCO FINISH PLAN 3 8 ELEVATION ATTACHED TO DECORATIVE TUBULAR STEEL RAILING ON rd TUBULAR STEEL PEDESTRIAN GATE THE PORCH COLUMNS AS INDICATED THE PLAN 3 C ELEVATION ATTACHED TO FOR PLAN 3 ELEVATION A 3'-0"WIDE PRIVATE COURT YARD TUBULAR THE PORCH POSTS AS INDICATED In U STEEL PEDESTRIAN GATE TO MATCH THE T-0"WIDE PRIVATE COURT YARD TUBULAR TIE. MASONRY PILASTER EITHER WOOD RAILING ON THE PLAN 3 6 ELEVATION STEEL PEDESTRIAN GATE TO MATCH THE plan 3 PEDESTRIAN GATE AS INDICATED SIDE THE PROPOSEEDD RAILING ON THE PLAN 3 C ELEVATION Court Yard Wall Elevations 0B-12-14 Plan 3 - Column / Wall Architectural Elevations 1d4 IRw 12-01.14) 20 PHASING j: V a MODELS-3 LOTS 6 /'a5 15 -- - I Ilnl (19,20&21) PHASE 1-8 LOTS 14 I ® (1-4&23-26) 1 PHASE 2-.8 LOTS i I ® (516,7-10.27-28) ; i > PHASE 3-7 LOTS — _ (11-14&2931) PHASE 4-SLOTS Q (15-17,21&22) /I 2 31 1 / 00 , , 12 C3 4� aJ ' ' I V i2 ' � O I °C o 7 3 4 7 I ` to U .. - -- - - - - - - _• I Phasing. �. T Pla aivararr L-------------- .. I q oe-�at� tai �', en.nne. ¢AIL•1 IC . (M 1201.11) e gt Arrow Route •14.4 3 T-1rT-1rr� OY =LJ LJ_J LL--L_iJ I I I I 1 -TTT1 r--� I I ISL ----------+ -I- r ,I 1 it I I I Q --T -- r—r — ————————————— EXISTING UTILITY LEGEND y1 1r — 11 I 11- WSTING UT41"POLE VATM OVERHEAD LINES Project Site 1 *—m EYDTING UIILITV POLE WTN OVERHEAD MES E� L J I I I I aS6S Madrona Avenue 1 and STREETLIGHT 1 = I� RaneaRCRean.W.CA9H130 L —J 1, — J , I It--Q EznHNc raEWRN STREETLICNr 00 N �� r— r —————————————————— Q—e ERDHNG 00 STIILETLIGHR rN I IrT '7 F.- 1 F T, 11 11 / I I I I I I I 1 I b C L'LJ • LJ_J LJ_J I � Cn O 0 --- ---r---- I -0 FT-I rT1 i rT-1 ; I 0 i I I ll I I I I I I I LJ_J! LJ J � L1J SII *_0 N F I T-I r I 1 ' r I -1 I I III I III I I T I I L J-J i L J_J I L J_J I Overhead I I I I Utility Plan _ .—....-... l _J.....-... �: � � r12-14 I I I - __--_ TGuu Hr=Er 1 l� (Rev 12.01-14) Arrow Route - - —_--_— NO PARKING OUI 7YMCAL PER RUM Stadara S-1 RUPO SUMra 5-1 Wmhp raft,-typkd I ' I 15 ,4 20 19 18 17 18 �� =111J 13 I —, ------ I , \ I 22 31 X30 Project Site I 0 Ran,M•etubn0,,u91)Se I I ' I 23 24 25 26 ! IF--'1 I _ _ I J I I — — — — - -- - N J I -I FTI - - I I I I ' �'• , 00 • I /I q.5 tc,NE"�'•,,"=� N 41 �I r T� I 1 .amtmaNru` �vl:,ripbek.uam«. ouneaoMinaw,atbez�dOogr � }J 1 ,weNea,e,w NN wr•v tlpkr L C J' LJ_J I ' .z.•..,••�.:�. INDICATES PROPOSED FIRE ACCESS NowearryyppyNaNlwdsks-Mlmo �— I a adMn,faksmOe +ed b,aba be I r 55L ww•a,ay.rm.rcroe.i.na,`�s-l-troka f E E �Ir r� I I II I U J I L J_J NO PARKING .a I _J ------------- 0 ma Fire Access I \ ....�.._...,,.�...�... ,�., Flan "....._.M ....... RUM - J - ------------- ---'- .._._ 1 '1 -—- Nlnlh Street (nw IpOt-tQ fta.t tIm q ' r'a Q nT ❑ ❑ O Porch ,tn I . .• —— B i' k _ I U0 Kitchen I MastLd, - I , I �1 `r BathMaster II t I s, Great Room I ..�' ,r4•.zea• I Poor.�B- I UP Pdr i Dawn I I V1 _ J GJ Laundry +� Bedroom 2 •—' ...,.._.. Bath 2 wr, ........ 1' 2�Car Garage ,Izrs•.za O .,,.: Be room 3 1`� o.,aa• I � 0 Vt L-----------J W it L Second Floor Plan " 2 First Floor Plan Conceptual Floor Plan 1 1,685 Sq.Ft. Living Area: — �,z-„ First Floor 679 ,;.•.,•-0• Second Floor 1,006 °; Total Living Area= 1,685 sq. ft. &,&a Garage 472 1 C: vr'v�y�i!-:,ii''4-}�Y'Yv�W�r Iri'..Iry ',rvx-.. ►p-i y'1!'u jrV'ia v'k ii' itti'vr +1"v iF rr4'v tit„ uvi'y'ri'1." .. J'41!'r'4l•-�'Fvr 'Y'J'I:'YJ{;-jrY-�•' J-ILYJ UVJ"{{'Y',J,��ii-{i+'J ' V'�1'li Y'J• vll l�.: „".�Y-.1�1. rv�y_�'r y'.'rJr r_Y-Y..r7..--:'r'x-.v'r.,.�'v'1. r'j4 it-J.'�rir{�• '�'11-v irY'V'li. j: . r ,wy.v-�'ti4 r4 •..11 a{Y ll u lril'iv'}h�Y'la 'tY'L'rti'4'fiil'41i' .'r::. -r. err, + y , i� 0 U)5 Jr ZEE - Er 0 s 3 14�+ + C g. j --------------fgtLc41J.9e——————- l l> I r-------- — l ? fl� 4 a x9 I I I I l Co I I I I — �� I LEFT ELEVATION'A' FRONT ELEVATION 'A' I .GONG.'J' zr l �'r-L^rr� +'� yMU}')!': �YV M"N'r' - •ii•4'?I' v'a'�1•v)lihifd'J .: 1. ': 1 TILE I v..7KuY•ixy..xva.vk',wY ti'''kY'Y4 V14M vY.NMY. LY �vrrli-'vm- : Y riHi-+! 1. in 'I l� vY rig-:•++w •� ILI ROOF PLAN E J.. jj --Fence Dine-----------fnri O MIMMUMMM. -0 MATERIAL NOTES i I ®®®®®® O N Root:Concrete's'Tile O r Roof Pitch:6:12116- Rakes:Flush RIGHT ELEVATION'A' REAR ELEVATION'A' yt 0 Eaves:/2' Cd d Building Height:26'-6• SPANISH ISH L weptalt Glen l Garage Panels U Stucco Exterior Plan 1 Wood Grained S Windowws On Stumm Wells Elevation'A' Wrought Iron Accents High-Density Foam Shutters w..ar•: 74&f1 P16.1t corm xo. 2 w O rp --1 --------------feR4e��e I LEFT ELEVATION 'B' FRONT ELEVATION 'B' I I CONC. 'FLAT' TILE 1 ` - L EA cm ROOF PLANS SME:V813--w I r— --- -- —g-- — -- — — EeQceLine ---J------, g 0 _ I MATERIAL NOTES Root:Concrete'Flat'Tile 0 Roo/Pitch:6:12 0 Rakes:12" ' : 0 Eaves:16" RIGHT ELEVATION 'B' REAR ELEVATION 'B' '-' L— Bullding Height:25'-6" tA Metal Sectional Garage Doors CRAFTSMAN U w/Opt.Glass Tap Panels Stucco Exterior 1.. Wood Grained Dense Foam Trim at Plan 1 Doors&Windows On Stucco Walls Elevation'8' Precast Stone Veneer-(No River Rock) w/Precast Stone Cap.Grouted Finish Around Each Sto Slone Be Taken To Grade-Below 1�eT�epscree Fiber-Cement Lap Siding Accents 8'12-1+ sm Wood Trim at Siding Locations Ira=10 Wood Tapered Columns Wood Porch Railing sale Board&Batt Siding Q 11.20-14 w ure Gable Ends 3 u v M61111 M1111 IN111111 0 V'.LIZN u0 Xg --1 i V 9 F- I I I FI a I —1 I LEFT ELEVATION'C" FRONT ELEVATION'C .............. — I i CONC. 'FLAT' 1 TILE l t71 � ROOF PLANSCAM'Iff-SW ' i --- -- -- _E ceLine -------- 0 MATERIAL NOTES l Rao(:Concrete'Flat Tile \ I 0 r Roof Pitch:7:12 0 Rakes:12' RIGHT ELEVATION'C' REAR ELEVATION'C' ;'' Eaves:12' Building Height:27'-6^ COUNTRY i Cbb Metal Sectional Garage Doors U G w/Opt.Glass Top Panels Stucco Exterior Plan 1 Doors&rwindows On Stucco Wells Elevation'C' Thin Brick veneer w/Cap.Veneer To Be Taken To Grade-Below Weepscreed mu Flber-Cement lap Siding Accents Utz u IW Wood Trim at Siding Locations tnt+na Wood Posts w/Brackets rte'• ats•u Wood Porch Railing High-Density Foam Shutters q, q , tri a: O A 9 I I I El Master Bath " Master 8 Broom reat oom 6 Nr v)ie F --- coUZ 9 /. van // Loft - '!` t V zcmm o I CSD laundry to r! ° .'Bath 2 N 1 I Z, -' .� :.:i r' wn ,i Be droo 2 - '`+� !- 1 2- Garage ' Be room 3 I !! 0 L———————— 0 W 0 Second Floor Plan First Floor Plan- u Conceptual Floor Plan 2 Living Area: 1,862 Sq.Ft. First Floor 748 Second Floor 1,1114 fM2_-14 Total Living Area= 1,862 sq. ft. "''"'-0' a a;; Garage 424 5 u ' q ERR J'r;v'rji v v:r{Y 4 tii^Y',y'v'!+J':r'{i 4-?'v !!'";, - _ U'�'J'WGu-Wvv�u'v'Wq'il'U'utir'S'yi1-{�✓J-:Yyia' .i.ir yY�ii{.+Y'4'. in `ii'iP-Z.Y.�1•ti•_rJ^Y`Y'i1'Y'YJ-41`i'�{'Ii'i.r. r•u-iI'ti'+'i!'1i'i'iSti•_l�•Y•..U'Y•�'JtiY 1444 WY`i'IJti'i:J'Y•lY .�i•Y-Y.M•'�•M.�'�(Y.�•tl•1�.� '�"1!'M'1YMM'V."�I Q] -t"r''•viY Etv:" vJ•C-:r''Sr-4'ii•rvv-�y}wriY:i-rV�l•riQti-iYGv'ii.Ivv�y:}4�}•r{r u-r •rv'i'�vr.rYv.• .+7"FfKll''i'+�'F'irr•' ;d 1 '1' --�, J'ti' 'O'LF'L'LYJ,ii'!i'U'u��a-:t:Y>-:iU':.iru:ti:l•:.vircL rJ'ir-W gv'W..•J:Ya'iF-W il-:i r:ii'�'r`U ZZZY'y IF \� V} 'l}!1r' 11'}• CONIC S I y y1 yy4r'�YS[lti'rY U: � �� TILEI ti o � l �i P9 .yEMT= aammumm �d I 1 $ ®®® I _ I i I I LEFT ELEVATION'A' FRONT ELEVATION'A' ROOF PLAN SCALE:WOW - - ' 4'lY'U'Y1Y' J't!'W '11 r G'V'' 11 1i1 r .'wL'•ri!`L'•ril-i:•a�ii-r`+�iY'ii•+��ti•iJ•i.•y�:r�ii•..y..�,iLW�-l;-il•y�, J-lrir "4'Yw YYif'4'W"v'I J' •:YiY'1}•V'fY 1+�r W'L'•'�v'li"rwU•gj{":{ -:Y; 'L 'YL• i'yifF „ Wy{Y-YLL?� AV.t ' L'v:Y WJ'v'{Y'y,viY Y'J•Wv'U' y1iY�'.i y� KYR! w.. y�Wr,�,ry,v.-�. W Y'4{i'II'li'11'Y'J':i'ii'�i Y'�'Y�•r W4�}'Y' i!U•Y•{Y'Y a'iYIIY ' '.' "r 'I-� '�r•L•Ir.YY'v'i1'ti`6•:+'L`Y'ii-u•cii-ii'3�N-1{'i _ _ pzvw- O0 E o Fan n 1 a� I O MATERIAL NOTES 1 E O Roe(:Concreie'S'Tile 1A Root Pitch:5:12 4)Rakes:Flush RIGHT ELEVATION' REAR ELEVATION'A' U Eaves:12' SPANISH *� eullding Height:2&-G' Plan 2 Metal sectional Garage Doors Elevation'A' w/OpL Glass Top Panels Stucco Exterior Wood Grained Dense Foam Trim al Doors&Windows On stucco Walls ceramic Tile Accents e� n..�w.r Wrought Iron Accents High-Density Foam shutters 6 • — --� s" �. .^" I I CONC. 'FLAT i o TILE ; I L— L! 1 I - I I ='--- LEFT ELEVATION'B' FRONT ELEVATION 'B' ROOF PLAN SCALE:1r6'"ILr PIHIIIIIIIIIIIII a t v to N Y lc O t - - VI ' MATERIAL NOTES 'a Roof:Concrete'Flal'Tile O C1 Roof Pilch:5:12 _ 0 O Rakes:12" Eaves:18" Building Height:25'-8" to Metal Sectional Garage Doors RIGHT ELEVATION'B' REAR ELEVATION 'B' i CC w/Opt.Glass Top Panels U G Stucco Exterior CRAFTSMAN Ift Wood Grained Dense Foam Trim at Plan 2 Doors&Windows On Stucco Walls Elevation'B' Precast Slone Veneer-(No River Rock) w/Precast Stone Cap.Grouted Finish gqroul1nd t�ach Sto e,Stone To Be Taken To Orade Bebw 1�Yeepscreetl -1214 Fiber-Cement Lap Siding Accents Or Mr Fiber-Cement Shingle Siding Accents Wood Trim at Siding Locations 5.16.14 Board&Batt Siding(d1 I1-20-14 Gable Ends 61"e1 Nw 7 u m IIIIIMH � U CONC.'FLAT I ` TILE l O s I I •;;. ;yam• ti u� fi� CIO Ott 1 I I I I ' LEFT ELEVATION'C' FRONT ELEVATION'C' ROOF PLAN rt SCALE:++9".1'4r fD N 0 N w $ C ._ E. U r----_— _Fe�ceLine_ — --- -- 0 = MATERIAL NOTES 1 0 i Roof:Concrele'Flal'Tile Roof Pitch:7:12 Rakes:12' RIGHT ELEVATION'C' REAR ELEVATION'C' U Eaves:12' COUNTRY TM Building Height:27'-8' plan 2 Metal Sectional Garage Doors Elevation'C' W1 Opt.Glass Top Panels Stucco Exterior Wood Grained Dense Foam Trim at Doors&Windows On stucco Walls 871 Thin Brick veneer wl cap.Veneer To Se Taken To Grade-Below Weepscreed iwra Fiber-Cement Lap skiing Accents 11-10-14 Wood Trim at Siding Locations ,++ Wood Poste w/Brackets 8 High-Density Foam Shutters i v k. j --------Porch —, ed O V.,s Maste BedroomFr En , +�• .u• _ N Master II Bath 1 IIUM "'•Great Room O w;! xr.4•x+r.r sd Y � s € s ' r ii I I I B Broom ----- • n K tc e oa.rr �r•x+vim• ' I Pd R.ro I Y I: 177-1 IWBath 2 ,Aahnd 4 I I •: i I �isp-p• " - 1� - .. — I i,nVec i •@Ililf �'tl -!Car Garage Bedroom 3 +a x+za• Oge�droom 2 r, r r ------------- 0 L---------i N b� U G Second Floor PlanFirst Floor Plan Conceptual Floor Plan 3 2,051 Sq.Ft. Living Area: First Floor 798 Second Floor 1,253 + "=+w• Total Living Area = 2,051 sq.ft. 0-16-147-29-14 Garage 434 9 U � " rn viY'yYv'1KVL'F!'.,•F"�K''!•Y-,✓� y tiY'" k 'ti�+i�:Yi•w•, 'Y'M'. Y�!�Y'✓'li'. .. 'Vry'•M''!•r•r� Y"li`t(N•Y•. ✓•Y ✓'✓' Y' -V' J'{f+'JYfY•Y^if V•JYf Y•, y'.,V,lrµ,: . ".j-•/'L-y•�Y' r,'Mh%-L•�'J•If r"Y1f M"J'r'u'� Y':.J r-v.r'�.,Y• •r., '-•�.v' .rq,r Y�!x�; .0 r K M•,lV4lf p..'r.w. lll����� - Yy•Y•✓„Y-'u'.���iY�-'4•r- �lsY%V'Y� -i'r.: rvY 11',!1'y'4• Y Y`{, 'r F'Y1^}'_ �!' r r r v'F 4 W,+Y h 0 I I I •J'4'Y'J ��s �� CONC.'S' I jTILE Fence Line __— —— ! m_' I I I I I I LEFT ELEVATION'A' FRONT ELEVATION 'A' I tA 1 i -\1; y L'.rL LvJ L'7ril G'irJ'l rll ey-li L'iril liv J s'i.-1:1:rr"F-11{i'p-ii•1nr'I/-,, - - --� K. 1 w'�'ti'.'-il';a•irti.y illi YV�Y'irY'r V'♦+'.rLv,r iY Y-� IVY irri'ir r�'Y'.r ttiry v'v+.."vY'�Y irliv4• v" iv ii'vjr lF�Y•� Y'.. ' �l'{7Y ROOF PLAN scut:ln•=Ta' kz 9H M C 'r U 0 v`— Feng Line __---, O 41 r--------- I 0- MATERIAL NOTES 1 I ®®®® ® M to Roof:Concrete's'Tile U G Roof Pitch:5: ' Rakes:Flush RIGHT ELEVATION'A' REAR ELEVATION A' Plan 3 Eaves:12° Elevation'A' Building Height:25'.6• SPANISH Metal Sectional Garage Doors w/opt.Glass Top Panels °tle 67&14 BaY Stucco Exterior tnt•-ro' Wood Grained Dense Foam Trim at a"+� Doors&Windows On Stucco Wells Q914 618.14 Ceramic Tile Accents 11-3•14 Wrought Iron Accents 10 "tl High-Density Foam Shutters 4� s --------- --- ---------- 1.1 luuuuuunmwn.l.1....■....1....■■ � -�ununmm�ul.un■ ■nnuunnuun...uuuulr - -� a u■L.O■...0....1.1.......1.1.......... ��..00/IO..■..011..�O..U111.......11..........1.199 k0�..�■��..��I��^"' mil ice_ all 111...111....1......1...........■ -1 � into I uuu IN II a■.■.1■.........■..11a1�r luunuunr- L.101...11.0.001..■1.■10NMI 1. •�nuunnunm. ■.U.L....OIO.O....I.U■1 IIOOO�r -,.uulumunuumummur �ry9� OE��.. �,�uunnunnumunnn"nm.uu211 nE oil �Innn�mn11n11n�un7= 1i i.>11.......Bill/.000011....L1111112mailn - anONa ME M���■����� M rV? all 11111 MC .in ® �MMl. - - - - :VI.a:d..v !liiliEiiil - -= X11.110.1.010■.■.■....■1.1..00IOO.. O.IIID....Oa1..O0.0.11■01.■.og.0go 011.00.....■■1."..11__ �`..�.-.-.�.�. .FBI zr+ ninnunuununmuuuuu."...."...�"."......""..."""".. nnnuuuu..".."...."."......"........... ".".".googol 7.1... ■....... .■1100..1.11101.1".....■OIUO...U11.111.....�."....1...01011.00.00.0111...■OO.■11Z�.11.0an 10 .100..gill.0..0■100...0.00111100..0.1..0.0..11......."."..".......■■...IIOIII nnnuunn III all l.uuunm.... unnuuunuuuuuunuuuuunn.......uuuuunar .�I�n......11u..n��nunuu._Inu1.111....1uuu...n.ulun�m F"Ca n�•�r r_ iIrI�Ir_il�I�� ■0 MIR law � �smarm am .w s_....__.-...._ cs� • Sell � ��4 a ������___��- • n it s ------- ------------------------7.•� ■�i1��irl.iiriiiiiiiiiir!iiliiiiiirililiiiir.riilr��ilil�irrlr�l� 1�11n111rlrl■nOnnn, '�InrnlUOrrrlrnnnllnr111rnnOrl:�_--- II�In�r��■t1�I�rIj7�r111111r:.� �.. �tinunwunrumuuv ,�I,��runwuunmuumuunuuuu.�......:r..—.:: puuununu zmmuuu--� a__ slowing III, ��1�mwuuummuumm�uum.:�uunmmril uuuunwiunnu� l�numnu•>, unnuuunm ll111n•- �s�¢s. ��umuwmuu I'll'annual llmr mnluu�rGi un uualp, nlnrpl�?4lnpppppnnpnpl _caflr■■��>�Y�nIlrllrlplrpprllnnnllnl■IIU1.,unnnII Ilnlrnrj.Orll r 11 l lrrj''..o-'s�'t_� altar i�rlrrrlrlrrlrlrrlrlrpnVy �Ir1r111nrrppppnpppppppp t l Urlrrr Irllrl Orrrlrnl U' i----- anuunuu■r1■11■Irrri� _�y■nnwnnununuuuunuunru:Anui uu nuuunr �:.mile 1r11rllrllllly 1 1 �nuuunuuneuuulllrlrllllluuua�ly ��mum 11 �� ____ n +eaatma `�a� aex�cr-a- Iw�;S Fccm- ■■ �I■■I,■■i I•■III ��, MMIIN■ gm l• Ijjl I1L1■■I■■ ■■ � ��I ��� �� n rl il1iiil1iiil�nn■u■■■■ . u nuuunuudl � _ _ _ _ �'� ununnnnuuuuuuuuuwuuuuu Iroling r-Isna rn on IGi� ■\Iw3f1■■I■■ fillr�l�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil�iiil�iiili�iil�iiil�iiili� Ill.a------------ fIIIlllnnnp11111 nrl111111r Ir11■111■11■■■rinnllrnnnO■� iuiuun `uuunnmurl - uuuurum■r1■r11■■r111rrlrlrr■r1■■■r1■rlrl■IIr■■■r11rr1111uulluu.____-===__ ��yuuuuuu uunnuunul CUuulmllr;�nu11r11m1 liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinunnuuunl111r/1■1111■rIr111111111111rinununuumnnuumnnuninuunn 1 �amuuw\mmmu nunnur■mr1■■IIIrr1■■1111■11■IIIIrIrrllrrrlr111111nnuuuumunumunumuununnnnnuul � �+� •�l�ruunw._-�uumr wmuuuuuunmwuuuuuunmuwmuuuwnumummmuummuuuuumumlrui� -t-=�=�. .\nuurwu.:.u1w u .mass lMEN l■■IIrNeill IIIIrl11r111rrrlrrlr1111rIr111111111111ruuuunuumuuuuuuuuuun���un��� 1 1� aunnuum:�■u■ 11urlrlrlr1111■r111r1111rr11111rr1111rr11rrrlrrllrlrrlunnuuur 9>!GIIr11r111rr111■�rI luuunnnnummnumunumumulnunumurumnn� ���4 �F >• v ...�__���•l , •• [z+r--i�.::ca�,gar- -iii--=-iic¢cw�---� r,--�e-, ��, ■■I I■■I_ L���I III■��II_ _I����L� ■�I �0■ ■■■■ ■�■■ h1 ■■I m■ ■■I■■ ■■I■■ : IIN■■I�� ��II�■�ie■�II �� v ungunnnirtnunmiuminnnnnnnn ■■ ■■I ■■■ ---rIiu- i�..luli_ilu • its ■■■■II ............................ ...............Nei ....... JMa g 6i ..r U O Va � G 0 rD n n n —i 1i�i li a li 7 I —irn—Irn a—u a Ir cr 11 11 ii ii ii rAIree ii ii,i •1i T4, l u n u u u ll 11 n ° u n 11 11 11 n u n n � nI n II u n u u n u n u u n = Pool Equipment Women Men Bl � O C I I'll F— yy Floorr v°"°8N°° Pool Building 1 l 0 o 1 P l a n Floor Plan 303 Sq.Ft. 303 Sq.Ft. &12-14 tri 110—t'-0' RaNpn tawr4 � �� 13 � k d N S y J O (n V?}] i - - �W.�r�"uylry its - - v$ Q �9 _ r ti 0 LEFT ELEVATION MATERIAL NOTES FRONT ELEVATION Roof:Concrete's`Tile Roof Pitch:4:12 17 Rakes:Flush i Eaves:12' fN Building Height:18'-0' C Stucco EKtedor Wood Grained Dense Foam Trim at ;;.Y4;y-�;G;i,f;i-i;,� Doors&Windows On Stucco Wells Wrought Iron Accents High-Density Foam Shutters -50O wvy k1 ww .� : — �y. O C tA 'O t.) to to RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION Pool Building Elevation mm B•1}74 9aU � r•�au 14 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA HO NOVEMBER 189 2014 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I CELL To ORDER-' : AcrIon► Roll Call TOO p.m. Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett_ Donald Granger X • Alternates: Ray Wimberly_ Frances Howdyshell_ Lou Munoz II: PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS` The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee wi;l address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,a:though the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. ENViRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW A. Approved with DRC2014-00570 — CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES — Site plan and minor revisions. architectural review of a 32-unit multi-family project on 3.2 acres of land on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street within the Medium(M)Development District-APN: 0207-262-01, 02, and 03. Related case: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18976. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP B. Approved. SUBTT18976—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES—A' request to subdivide • 3.2 acres of land in order to develop 32 detached residential 1 of 3 EXHIBIT B Item G-H 37 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA NOVEMBER 18, 2014 Com. and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. s ..��. fir. - ya - wANone.. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously.included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent .meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. gg , x + 7 p.m. M. Pit p ' y The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m.adjournment time. If items go beyond that time,they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 3of3 Item G-H 38 INFORM (Par I Intel hidyr). Lf&--Aeubkoylb awn tMWaermtOWM 477-27M Tf*: . :. .. kqVleftMdzCEQJL 9 ls'bnoortard that Om b.151wagZSCRAwalrequeste :t . n ..n Mpon tom►o : .spy Pwt I and the d s �:' bireHqpuhvd= deedidd . the ate$ . ' 'p be videss : MM9 f6p,go. tor an-: .p imfti t!di 1 .= Appfimbw NwrAlurforthep b uftdiftsIrmfir. rte. Trac 18M_Mftne Ave-Shadoxi age Name aofowwftj - Larry Pharr4 Lea Lee&.K=Vft Lee-8W Ma&wm Ave,,Rexsw Cwamona,CA 9173D Visent Yuen-Pak Sze+D-8565 M-drare Mmue,Randw Com,Cao 97930 Mao Mm 2hou-8551 Afthrm Ate,-Ram Cuarnonga,CA 9.5739 Nwm Addraw of dbvekpw or prcjed CresbNood QmrruirMes 519 W.Citrus Edge Street • tea,CA 91740 69941945 nffim arx5 W&33&&i2D fax U~4MIM 3 ------..._...-- ----- -----. - Page 1 d10 -EXHIBIT C Item G-H39 Paftmk C Per=&Address: Wiz,QwWmod'Gtt m es 810 W_CAnis Edge Stta K.Ghmdom CA 91740 Name&Address(Wpersw OWNhV this&m('TdFwUf9ftm aiaveX 7efepfrorte latrnnber- M,814-OM terve and S2&-795 3106� if bmraSon vWkated by an ( is not cfa CUP's w1kwahmnse mWwsftdbysfaK t1) pmbWe a fO scale(8-:2 x 11)copy c fOw MGS t Srs s 9.wpnaj d sem,andhxkate the sgeboes 2) Provide a sdiofcdOrPhWOVWhS thai shOw f4Pf8SwfBffw views ws kdD the she fr w die Lauth;smft east,and views bily a d ftm Me sle fiUm tfM pdsraY a=sss paegs ffidSMMthe sft and mpresenfta�v OWS Of rt feahaes tm o site` !fine a mP shD%679 of e8t*pf tt 3) Projed (describe): The ibiswed art Sae east sude d fifti t ne beftieert karma Route and gib Ste.in Rancho QXMIOM CA 4) AsseeswesParcd k s.(affwh sheet f7�: y -6) Gff=Site,Ame Ocftq it) 3.2{i8 -6) Afet Site Area{toil sa7+e so,-.n*w area ofptd*c sfeeft&wed 2.967 7 Abe wWserf€or zone ct=W' hmb arlliec€the p sde (athich 6onW 4xWffnfraessw-h: A+generd p1w anwndment ar zane`dmnge vwM NOT bene P I P for#is WCOCL Page 2 of 40 updated 414 412013 Item G-H 40 8) !'tirade a stescaipt Mflfa9 peens wMoh w2he necessaryhomMe Odyof Rancho t,'acarr&W acid oHwgDvernnmn&d agencies itr rfoMy krowmwd the project Permits needed for Im pygect are rough graduig,Aght of way permrt for streets,sewer,water and storm drain along with retmmg waft,parkneter walls; ,Irl,spa an buffft perrr6ts&a WDID# frorrl the state water resource ftt. 9) Describe the physical seffing of the sie as ft.edsft beibre tirepF4er anckmt kenrnwtbn on#opngmphy,se stabjIfy, pfartfs and arzmals, mahve trees, and roads, drainage ww-w-% and soerk aspects. Describe any extshng sfnrchow ort sits fax*iA gageand camthort)and the uw ofthe damhee& A#tacfrphotographsofsOvWmWfeafrrres described. Tn eAD aff sow ces afkibmzstan yrLe_,g arxflzwhy fifes,.biofica�ardreatogiraf surveys,frafric mss): Rease see attached • Updated 4hl=3 Page 3 of 10 Item G-H 41 10) Descn3effieft wr cOurdandlar --ft if satowsih-- CdieaTtsounresrf*ftmagw , andondr. There are no know CWkna l ortdstwiced aspects on itis side. 11) Describe anynoisesawuwand#mkkvelsnotvaffectdre fa .raedway eit}andhowmeyw8affed proposed uses: f4ease see adadied 12) Describe Me pWowdpvojedw deW. This shmiUprwAleavadeqmsEeffesm*dw o€the site in terms ofuffmde use hW WHIM&ftW die proposed proms irtdkete ff.Umm are p uposed phases ibr deveftawni: gm wderd of devekpmed tooccur with eadrphase,.and#fieanficoatedoohvfeach kxrenwnt RfflacJraddffiorral.9heeet(s)if necessary. Please see attached 13) flesorrbe a�� ' P acrd ardanYGIARLYAhkdoricatarscank s.. e�typec�ffa��(r �e�),aitar�rr�k�dr►se +� & dwM .dqmfte$sb use dr-)and scare oldemdopmt 019W ftnbW,s8118Ck MWYNA sh-_): lease see armed PVe4 of 9a Updated4►11�t3 Item G-H 42 1.0 VM Oke prapased pied dwVe Me padmM scat,,ar characterafMe=r=mag geneW area of fhe per? No,the proposed development wf r;a#change Ote pallm she or draracter.of#n swinunding. • generalllan- 15) bdx le the type ofshort term and k vw-fray rye ar 6e gem kwhmft soreae anduff#ese awe &%Ws affedalaceWpupertbs and o uses? Mnd rrrethods ofd are proposed? There roiS be gw"d dwnrtenn const�noise:gererateid from Vie sit ftbV conslawfion tel+ during the appFOVed desiWated hOM Of 40peration as regwred by the Cly build dep L After corVefon #here wA be rye from]he daffy ac fm*of the residue !16) lnd cafe pressed remnvars andi3r of mature ersr #Tees: There are apprfloc'fi Mak.yfi trees orrs!e#hat rave been dsma§ed by.natural uEa ming whtds. These trees wA be replaced per the City standard arrd a kture aftrist rept • � e arty S flf v�eT(fig C ersrlpp�S)� �#.'she drains: The sate does not drain.soca.any existng bodes of water or domegfic waW suppge& The.site wig drain bAo the e)&&*storm drain system;meted a#the soufeast.corner of the pmjecL 18) fndxaf,-e*eched agww#of water usaga. ,(See Affadmre#Afar usage a sj_ Fbrfty€irer dpi;.pbase contact the Cucarmnga Vasey Water at O)987:2%1. a ResidenfW&Wusy) 22'250 mak rw fgaMao 45�12g b_ CwmnardaP W(9 vim) Peak rye(g ac) 19) InmateproposedamftdQfsewaged&posaf. E2 sepftTank El.Sewer_ tf septic tanks are PaPosect.attach p hmft ff a to a sa r emis p ircxte eAwcteddaffysewa}a n; fSee�fAkrusageesffinaho Fbrfwffnwdaftaffiw�,pb e.ca&,c#fhe Cucwmnga Vater►Water i Z07d at(909)987 2WE a Residential(gakbo 8,640 3b. (g~w) • UpdaWd 4t71M13 Page Sof iD Item G-H 43 RESIDE AL PROJECTS, 209 Aftm9wofresk1wWuwtw 32 tamed roxfbalb,oaqjs of parcel sb s,n*zkjum lat Siwe and nxvdmm tot she. The pmpd wS amdst of 1 lkt uft 32 anal ids. The are deftkaded for each unitvA vaiy ftm 2,290 SF to 2,89t1<SIF wfth an average size of 2577 SF. . anhed (odkate wheMerwaft are reW(wibr'safe unks): 21) Anficpaledofsob s.ard/turwts Sate f�fiCe(s9 $ �D to s Rent(wnlrtWh) $ tD A 229 Specafy rofbedroo sbywi#Ww. Plan 1-1,627 SF,tm stay,2 bed,2 baSf Plan 2-9,800 SF,bvo story,2 becL 2 bath Plan 3-2,1343 SF,hm Amy.S bed,2'bath 23) tndcate wed hoed sfzo by rant type: Plan 1 -1,627 SF Plan 2-1,800 SF Plan 3-2,024 SF 249 thnthcate ttw e*eded. mzber ofsdmd dt arty wNbe res&V ftprqect Ciorrtffl;t the aPPFPPr4Bfe 3r hcd DistricLsas stxmn lc.Adadxnw#It 20 a. tlemertwy' 10 b JrrniorMgtr 20 c. SerenrHgh C C;b4 d;NfltTSTRML AM MSTHM DrDMA P"R C S M DesafttyWofuWs)andmap*mxgWs)ofcommwdatkdusWcrir uses Updated.911 1M3 Page 6 cf io Item G-H 44 Ol 26) Tialtl wmwofconvnerdalWit,urkisffluffaq&Iuses bytype : 27) lAftate hours oymagm 28) fll rvfamp[oyees TOW. Maxinnrrn.Shr7f: Torre Of AlclikMan Sh>i 29) Pmigde bmakdmmm sfai&Wated job mss,a Viand sab7r&Ws;as:seffas.an mdcabanDf#ie rdteo! hires ku$adr sdassr {mach amt sheet rt rre.�sary� • 30 Esftafibn afore mf rs#u be hed thatarrrengr in the Qfy.- -31) For corrrrnerdal and#idusbial.rte G*.hs ffM#O€Ise source,type,and asst of air pof 6m e - � Mata shoidd be veydbd fhrnugh Me SmA Coast,4r Qu&W•A&nageme rf Da b14 at('898)572-6283 ALL PROJECTS 32) Ham ft rvater,.sewe,fire,and ffavd agenrxes servarc,y&e p �'veer, a'.to ddennm MeraWtyin pvrrvide adM ate mvme to fhe proposed pcvfiRcO .gscy.prle-�urdcate thdirresponse . Yes,they have been cwtacted.and there is adequate Service tD the site. • updated 413312013 Page 7 of'ts Item G-H 45 �esof# drrusa �ac�a0er s de,bWawjKthY*9d1oPC8's;RK&N3CffWSUbS1anCW pesg=bsand hed*064 �oft and andgasem Atsn wxkrgmwidskrageafawfofMeabove. Maps Id Me materlaft and desm a iheirtoo,sbrage,awVw dschaW w Die pecpwV,as eW as then dates etwo,ff korm. Mone 34) ordbdwwofhazwdowardAwW=vzskvkk kwhAfthef fid tDftwe exanpies ffstedaboyov lfym pie as monfafyiof a9such nishvials to be used and pmpowd me#W&dsposat The kxmfm+ofsuch f mea abV mire strage and arear,,.Abe shDWH and wed 071he qPft8dW PkM NO nis aPP&OW sW he requkdto pay any wand Ganie,(M The prGjedcw*w mess 35) app*tDfix!spmj&& M amara to-be n3ade payable to Me K c&-ft ted 9wervisors acrd sr ed tD the Dkedar.hearirlg: herd'aerffy.OW the sbbmer&.Aynkhod.abDWO and in the pramt flo data and H#M199w reWMW far adequateevskmfim GFOWSPW�6&6&ebestafmyaW1fy,ihatihefacft skftmwft and&d=;affonpmswdedarsbward ned totbe be&ofrnylar s and bei t fr er rd#rat kftifmfti;mWbe regtdradto be steedbefom an adequate ara>uatb+can be nm3de by Me CkylotRarcho Haire: June 9?,244 Sknaftne: . r e: � �amities Updated 4MIMM3 Page s of to Item G-H 46 Part 1 of the Initial Study(Environmental Assessment) • 9. Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography,soil stability,plants and animals,mature trees,trails and roads,drainage courses,and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the sMictures.Attach photographs of significant features described.In addition,c#e ag sources of information(i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The side gently slopes from the northwest to the southeast. The project is made up of 3 adjoining fesidential parcels at 8551,8555 and 8583 Madrone Avenue. There is one residence existing on the northern parcel with a detached garage and is well maintained. The central site is vacant and undeveloped. A single family residence is located on the souther.parcel as weal. Also well maintained with a swimming pool and two small shed size buildings. The eastern half of this parcel is undeveloped and in a vacant state with some miscellaneous trees and dight vegetation. 11. Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft, roadway noise, etc.)and how they-wttl affect proposed uses: • The site is currently affected by normal residential roadway noise from Madrone Avenue. There is also rnirmnal foadwway noise from Arrow Route which is approximately 300'north of the project and from 9th street which is approximately 675' south of the project. The proposed parkway and setback landscape areas with die planted with street trees,cm-site accent trees and shrubs to help mitigate adjacent traffic noise. 12. Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of uhtmate ttse that will result from the proposed prclect. Indicate tf there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase,.and the anticipated completion of each increment.Affo*oWditibfxg sheet{s)if necessary. The proposed development of tract 18976 consists of 32 detached single family residences, which include two stogy horses. The,project will also include the construction of streets,curbs, gutters,a storm drain, catch basin, block walls, landscaping, streetlights and a common pool house festfoorn facility, swimming pool, spa, barbecues and an overhead shade structure along with common and private landscape areas. Also included in the public improvements will the construction of the sewer&water systems#or the proposed units. The project will be built in approximately 5 phases. Construction should begin in early 2015. • Item G-H 47 13. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, hktorfcaf,or scent's aspects.indicate the type of farad ttse(residential,cora nwdaf,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses,shops,department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback,rear yard,etc.J. To the north of the project is a similar parcel of size and use with a single family residence. To the east is an attached apartment complex that was converted in to condoraaenhmts within the fast few years. To the west across Madrone Avenue is an attached condominium project with completed street improvements on the west side of M adfone. To the south is art approx+mate 5 acres site that has been 'designed as a public park to be built by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within the next few years. Item G-H 48 ------------=----- .J 3 I I a - -y _ _ - I Project Site — I r—y 9565 MadroneAvenue + Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 I ------___----- ----- _— --=--- cc I I I I � I I JI---- - - ---1--- - - °' u _ b I I I I V1 U Photo exhibit OCORRREESPONDING SITE FFMOTO Plan ON-SITE PHOTO EXHIBIT °& -�L Awa 8 �n9 14�t 6i r 1� � ft k�r inyq ens d r�r.qr lit 04 �11 �y } b r fir. ] # C {I t �ij�re r<r t r 6a1!�TT 1y( �.#+ ` 111 :�.1fitl➢n r[ {y x#een (4 ' .�i x- Mm ��`�y I. I Ild �.rY .'� mn•M. yy i �"o1m� 4ieHYY9�Y+F9FXf6�M�NMM{1� h �l e L� � e IVI A b. eal�,F,wP t • d + ' t+ m F r Y Y^ 1 � 4., .# 1. #1, e • F��p#•�`�. �s •�� Wk I J � 3 ' � rid - ik i [fx 4, g fAF'S1 �. t ti,i .�: . t ird t4•,onh , t . i � f i • yr •Y ��ge�gy� f�. t� •' �♦ . �4murw:M•.+� «`moi '::.i J� 'R� _.� � .: �i kdt;aka, r ,7 �Ni E�m' �}`dx�Y�"�`'dl� v��rYd"��,�.^"' rte, f�4 ; • �k>�Y, ' n;• rte% ,.y��l ",tr�.s�.�'19 'p•c�e� d%7.. - 'A 1 s � ' h �fx k+��+iY� �.... n tNriYJ�. �A' • - ., «mss.• � 7 ,� .. 'pe ` Yr k 9 I MORIN 0 q,awg°y�,' M1"7p e I�I.� L el j it� I dal✓��{af 41 R{'�Y v5 YI� Ylr(�'dry �fl��d}��C� City of Rancho Cucamonga - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ' INITIAL STUDY PART 11 BACKGROUND 1. Project Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT18976 and Development Review DRC2014-00570 2. Related Files: N/A 3. Description of Project: A request to subdivide a 3.2 acre site and to develop 31 detached residential condominiums for a site located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street that is made up of three parcels which includes two existing single-family residences that will be removed as part of the project; APN: 0207-262-01, 02 and 03. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Crestwood Communities 510 West Citrus Edge Street Glendora, CA 91740 5. General Plan Designation: Medium Residential • 6. Zoning: Medium Residential 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is approximately 350 feet from north to south and 369 feet from east to west and is made up of three parcels that are developed with two homes (8551 and 8583 Madrone Avenue) that will be removed as part of the project. The site is relatively flat, contains multiple mature trees and has been regularly cleared of brush. To the north are two lots developed with single-family residences; to the south is a future City park site that is developed with multiple unoccupied residences; and, to the east and west are multi-family housing developments. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: N/A GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD—California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District • EIR— Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx—Nitrogen Oxides Item G-H 53 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT18976 Page 2 ROG—Reactive Organic Gases PM,o—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board. SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant4m pact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓ )Aesthetics (✓ )Agricultural Resources (✓)Air Quality (✓) Biological Resources (✓) Cultural Resources (✓)Geology&Soils (✓)Greenhouse Gas ( ) Hazards &Waste Materials (✓ ) Hydrology&Water Quality Emissions ( )Mineral Resources (✓)Noise ( ) Land Use&Planning ( ) Public Services () Recreation ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Utilities&Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of ( )Transportation/Traffic Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets: An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT s_required, but it must analyze only the effects that _ remain to be addressed. ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are irp:lposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: '/ ' Date: Reviewed By: �-aA,<1/' oC-t:tti,__ Date: 1 d" 1^7 ' y Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 54 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 3 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than Pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project.- a) roject.a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic features or buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C) The site is located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th and is surrounded by residential development to the north, east and west and by a future City park site to the south. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project as it will be of a similar design, scale and density to the surrounding development. The design of the proposed 31 residences has been reviewed by the City's Design Review Committee and found consistent with the design standards and policies outlined in the Development Code. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. The change to the visual environment due to the project is not considered a significant impact, no mitigation required. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security.lighting used in the . immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant, no mitigation required. • Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With ThanSignificant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, ora ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract. C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources. Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) () (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not used for agricultural purposes and is located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th which is surrounded by residential development to the north, east and west and by a future City park site to the south. There are approximately 209 -acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to-30 acres, and their economic viability — - is doubtful; thereforei they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project site has not been designated Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance in the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The impact is not considered significant, no mitigation required. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. The impact is not considered significant, no mitigation required. C) There is no land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 56 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. The impact is not considered significant, no mitigation required. d) There is.no land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. The impact is not considered significant, no mitigation required. e) The site is located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th and is surrounded by residential development to the north, east and west and by a future City park site to the south. Neither the project site nor the surrounding parcels are used for agricultural or forest land. Furthermore, there are is no land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest.use. The impact is not considered significant, no mitigation required. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? • b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) { ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 (increase in the frequency or severity of violations of local air quality) or Criterion 2 (exceed assumptions in the AQMP consistency with the 2003 AQMP). The density of the proposed project is consistent with the level of development anticipated by the General Plan for the project site. Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. • b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 57 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM,o and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a. reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (Os), coarse.particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o); fine. particulate matter. less:than .2.5 (PM2.5) microns. in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO); nitrogen dioxide(NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment° depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast - Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM,o and PM2.s. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook (http://www.agmd.gov/home/regulations/cega/air-quality-analysis-handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed in the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, an air impact study was.prepared by Vista Environmental (July 29, 2014) that utilizes the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod)Version 2013.2.2 to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Green House Gas Emissions. Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 58 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 7 ® Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated ImpactIm act Short Term (Construction) Impacts Construction Related Criteria Pollutant Emissions ----------- Pollutant Eetrir ans(lioundsidny) ALlivift Voc Nth Cts Soh PM10 PM2.5 1?cm�alltl�n' Geo-Sita 4.60 4954 36.29 0.04 2.59 2.37 OkfSias 0.17 1.09 ,119 0.00 0.24 10.08 Total 4.77 $0.63 38.48 0.04 2M 2.45 Grading' On-Site 3.83 40.42 26.67 0.03 4.89 3.46 O£f_�itr 0.46 5..89 5.33 0.02 4,64 0.23 Total 4.29 46.31 32.00 0.05 5.49 3.69 Building Construe-fti On-site 3.66 3,0.03 18.75 0.03 2.12 1.94 Off Site 4.13 0.61 1.77 0.00 0.22 0.0^+ TGUL1. 3.79 30.64 20.52 IX03 2.34 2.05 Paving tea-Situ L82 1834 12.56 0.02 1.11 1.02 Off Site 0.09 0-11 1.38 0.00 0.23 0.06 Total ----_ _- 1.91 18.45- 1.3.94 0.42 1.,34 108 • Architectural Coatings - On-Sire 13.82 2.37 1.88 0.00 0.20 0.20 Off-site 0A1 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.03 0.01 TWO 13A3 239 2-09 049 0.23 0.21 SC-QAVIDThresholds 75 1.00 550 150 1.50 Exceeds Tlireshoid? No No No No No No NOWS! - Ddmalidam and Grading emissimx tmrd on adhemce to.usilive dust=Tprezion Will SCAQNV flute qfs. 'Otsile emizsiaec f m agnigmtmi not opera-4 an P-W is mda. 'OET§io cwissi,am Eroart vehicles eptming na public nm& Sour(&ChlEE2vtdd Veriii m 2013 2.2. Eauinment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor-vehicles transporting-the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 59 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the Os precursors. The project proposes the construction of 31 detached small lot single-family residences. The architectural coating phase was modeled based on covering 116,640 square feet of residential interior area, 38,880 square feet of residential exterior area, 144 square feet of non-residential exterior area and 432 square feet of non-residential interior area. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed buildings will result in approximately 13.83 lbs of VOC per day during the coating phase. The emissions would occur after grading activities, near the end of the construction period. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the _ counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less than signifcant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State _-. .- standards...During._the..construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) on a project- specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 60 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 9 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially Significant Than pP 9 Significant Mitigation Than No Impact incorporated Impact Impact manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, .the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally,contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling.. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds . exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. • 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 61 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentlaSignificanntt wan Than We Significant No Impact Incorporated Impad Impact 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in.Table 4.1-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (Os), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM,o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Long Term(Operational).Emissions and.Impacts Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of residents in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and in the parking area. Operational emissions for the project are shown in the table below were calculated using CalEEMod model to account area, energy and mobile source emissions. The proposed project was analyzed based on 31 single-family homes and parking lot with 24 resident and guest parking spaces. The operating emissions were based on the year 2016, which is the anticipated opening year for the proposed. project. The CalEEMod analyzes the operation emission from area sources, energy usage and mobile sources. Pollutant Emissiatts(Voundslfs9} Aedylty y Voc vox CO s .P-M P1Vt2.5 Area Savrcest 1.54 0.03 2..68 0,00 0.01 0.01 Energy Usuge2 0.03 0.21 0.1E 0.00 0.02 0.02 mosle snamad 134 4.35 16.09 0.04 2.39 068 Total 8112 ODS 2.91 4.65 111.99 0.04 L42 0.71 SCQ.q,It4IfOperadenalThresholds 55 55 554 154 iso 55 Eseee L%TbredwWl'Y No tvo No No yaiea: 'A'tr}a sorrow consist Or ea3i6siaus If"ht:mtbL.ca"isfcr raodttrts,mancetuml mxdinM and kridsmpiVaqUOMIL I Encw usage consist etatedrsiatts fto m tlsomal vs U-se. vubih Wurus mcaist of emissions ft.m rettietca 04 MW dust. Sauccc:Vista En+ironmcnUd.atiteu9died NrT CdEF:Mad 4 etsoun 20132.2 Gar yW 2016.. As shown in the table above, project does not exceed SCQAMD thresholds for operational emissionsfrom area sources, energy usage or mobile sources. Therefore the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts and no mitigation measures are necessary. According to the CARB transportation performance standards, the rate of growth in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and trips should be held to the rate of population growth (SCAQMD 2006). Compliance with this performance standard is one way suggested by CARB of showing compliance with the growth assumptions used in the AQMP. If the total VMT generated by the.proposed project at build-out is at or below that predicted by the AQMP, then the proposed project's mobile emissions is consistent with Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 62 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 11 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than pP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated I Impact Impact the AQMP. As the 3.2 acres project site is an infill residential project that is in a predominantly residential neighborhood, the project is not significantly different from what was appropriately assumed for the site in any growth rate or trip generation assumptions. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (long term) Long Term (Operational) Emissions - The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, continued development would be cumulatively significant if each project cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 2) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 3) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 4) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 5) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 6) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 7) All residential. and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 8) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate- thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ® ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 63 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Im ad d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors:. long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are-located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of an elementary school. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed.in Section b) above will reduce any potential impacts to less-than-significant levels. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational odors (Long-term)typically associated with residential uses are from activities such as cooking and gardening. Similarly common odors associated with mixed-use and commercial land uses would be expected (i.e. restaurants). Local odors from the majority of land uses would be similar to other urban areas and would not be considered significant. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and therefore are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ......through- . habitat- _.modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) V) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federal) protected wetlands-as defined by Section 404-of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) ( ) V) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 64 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 13 ® Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located.on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th and is surrounded by residential development to the north, east and west and by a future City park site to the south. The project site is developed with two single-family residences along with multiple accessory buildings used for storage. On-site vegetation includes 9 mature trees, residential landscaping and native vegetation which have been regularly cleared. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. A General Biological Assessment (Natural Resources Assessment, Inc., August 2014) was performed on the project site and found that nesting habitat exists on the site, and there are potential impacts to nesting birds from the removal of trees. The report recommended that if tree removal occurs during nesting season (February 1 through August 31), that a bird survey be conducted. If • nesting is occurring, it is recommended that removal of the trees be delayed until after the nesting is completed. The following mitigation measures identified in the General Biological Assessment shall be implemented: 1) Prior to approval of a Grading Permit, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions,.then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 65 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 14 Less Than Significant Less . poterti8y �' Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: SignifiearMitigation Significant nt No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. There are no tributaries or wildlife corridors on the project site or in the surrounding area, therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are 9 heritage trees on the project site. An Arborist Report (Steve Andresen, September 28, 2014) was submitted for the project analyzing the onsite trees. The analysis determined that all of the onsite trees would need to be removed to make way for the proposed development. The City's Development Code requires that 45 trees per gross acre be planted on the site of new residential projects in the Medium (M) Development District. The project proposes planting 153 new trees on the project site, 9 trees in excess of the minimum requirement. The analysis also determined that there is a eucalyptus windrow just to the south of the project site that would be impacted by the construction of a property line wall. The report recommended that open fencing with pilasters be used along the south property line to protect the eucalyptus trees. With the required planting of 153 trees as part of the project's landscape plan and the following mitigation measure identified in the Arborist Report, the project will have a less than significant impact on the environment: 1) . Open wrought iron'fencing with pilasters shall be used along the south property line to protect the eucalyptus windrow located just south of the project site. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) V) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to _.-. .. ...-. § 150(A.5? . ..._... C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () V) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site. A Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report (CRM Tech; August 2014) was completed for the project site. The report finds that there are two 1940s vintage Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 66 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 15 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially Wth Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact residences currently present with the project site at 8851 and 8583 Madrone Avenue. Each structure was previously recorded as potential "historical resources," evaluated for historic significance and found to be ineligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources or in the Local Register of Historic Resources. As these determinations have been adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for planning purposes, it is the conclusion of the study that neither of these buildings meets CEQA's definition of a historic resource. However, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR. (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the.City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or • significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to-eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, . documenting the. inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 67 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues andSupportin Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the. following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to,the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor,trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). _ • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by the construction to residences and.has been regularly cleared of brush. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site.- The impact is not considered significant, no mitigation required. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () ( ) V) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines. and Geology Special Publication 42. Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 68 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 17 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? • Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes approximately 1 mile to the north of the site and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 miles north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing MW 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to MW 7.5 earthquakes is 15 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to MW 8.2 earthquakes, is 17 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon • as possible. Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 69 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 18 Less Than . Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and SupportingInformation Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a.schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 26 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga gravelly loamy sand (0-9 percent slopes) soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga,. including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga gravelly loamy sand (0-9 percent slopes) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically used for irrigated small grains and pasture plants and runoff is very slow to slow. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse,gas,emissions,..either directly or 0 indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the _- environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Regulations and Significance -The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 70 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 19 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Im act Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs.through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N2O], hydrofluorocarbons [HFCs], perfluorocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SFG]. The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit(°F)over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. • The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended _ Actions.identifed by ARB. _In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project _. has been analyzed based on a performance based standard (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PM,o, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM,o, • and PM2.s levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's- Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 71 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act. Incorporated Impact Impact to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted the staff proposal for an interim.GHG significance threshold for projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency. The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis (Vista Environmental, July 29, 2014) uses the SCAQMD interim GHG significance threshold in their study of the projects projected GHG emissions. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning.and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The proposed project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. The proposed project was analyzed using the CaIEEMod model based on the development of 31 small lot single-family residences with a pool, tot lot and approximately 24 onsite resident and guest parking spaces. The proposed project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area source, energy usage, mobile sources, waste disposal, water usage and construction equipment. A summary of the results is shown in the table below: Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions - Grewhause Gas Em$tsiont(Aietric' ens per Year) Sao-CO,Cate' o-CO, N 033MG-COs TOW CO, CH, rls[F -. -- CO,.ae Area Soon 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.00 US Energy+Osap' 0.00 130.40 130.40 0.00 0.00 131.04 Mobile Saurees3 0.00 462-60 462.64 0.02 COD 462.99 Solid Waste' 7.66 O,OD 7.66 0,45 0.00 11.16 'rata and WastewatcO 0.66 11-93 12,61 0.07 0.00 14.58 Cot»uclioud OA0 17.30 17.30 0.00 0.00 1734 Total Emissiares 8.32 -622,.79 631.11 0.54 0.04 643.71 SCAQMD Draft T'hresbold of SligtatrMttce 3,000 No.'s' 'sLrn�atS OtH1Yis1 L,fCtLfi em-sssaaos tiomhrnntrr„caaurrxrpro6uees,aeshitceNra!awri�,�d t���¢VttYprnrn[• s rsntrg}'usrege coo�A ai GHG cnt►srians h01+!eltx�iclty itixt aansrr3 gas vis. 'hiabibr snug=consist of ONO emisstdms fmm velhittca. 'wmm irrR wim the C%and CFL ennsdana t mood from the Solid whit pl acd sntsm rug- `Wwcr includesCHG emis�Stromatwricisy zed for rtAnspart ofwan ud paacrSSittC of wasre+6%10- Cotreowiwri c rrimi=sanartisat arrr 30 years ss recomstrcndod in et SG40N.W G'HG W ot1 wg Group on Ni ember t9.2009. So==CsIE Mad Version 2013.22 for Ym 2016. Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 72 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 21' • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP orting 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact impact The data provided in the table above shows that the proposed project would create 643.71 MTCO2e per year. According to the SCAQMD draft threshold of significance detailed above, a cumulative global climate change impact would occur if the GHG emissions created from the on-going operations would exceed 3,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, a less than significant generation of greenhouse gas emissions would occur from the development and operation of the proposed project. Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel- powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily. carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's ate also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cha, and N2O. CHa is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air ® pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice dally or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies'and information available to the City • at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 73 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With, Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Signifcant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The project involves the construction of 32 small lot single-family residences and therefore would result in a net increase of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: energy efficiency, renewable energy and energy storage, water conservation, solid waste measures, land use measures, transportation and motor vehicles, agricultural and forestry and off-site-mitigation. The.project is located near existing transit lines; because it is an infill project; it is required to install water efficient landscaping pursuant to the City's Development Code; and, will participate in the City's waste reduction and: recycling programs. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant.to Senate Bill(SB) 375. The project's-long term operation emissions will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed SCAQMD interim GHG significance thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a significant long term cumulative impact with the following mitigation measures: 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient,.. recycled and. manufactured..in an. environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed Califomia Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and _cooling equipment,light fixtures, and appliances, Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored"cool" roofs and cool pavements, Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for.outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 74 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Fany With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project proposes the construction of 31 detached multi-family residential units. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that • respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities: The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHGs and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. However, the proposed project does not exceed thresholds established by SCAQMD and would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AB) 32, and therefore would be less than a significant impact. S. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) . _ (✓)_._ . environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) (.) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 75 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 24 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. Residential development, though, is not anticipated to create any hazards to the public. The use and generation of hazardous materials is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities which include the use of paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State: The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than- significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other-in the - --- - Stater-- The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The Los Amigos Elementary School (11801 Lark Drive) is located within 1/4 mile of the project site. Typically, residential uses do not. create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 76 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 25 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is-located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The project site is within the Airport Influence Area as indicated on Map 2.5 (Overflight Notification Zones) of the LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The Plan requires that the developer provide the future homeowners with a notification at the time of sale that the property is within the Airport Influence Area (AIA) and is subject to increased overhead noise levels. Less than significant impact is anticipated with the following mitigation measure: 1) The developer shall provide future homeowners with written notification at the time of purchase that.the project site is within the LA/Ontario International Airport Influence Area and is subject to increase overhead noise levels. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 and 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that ® has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. No impact is anticipated. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere - ( ) - ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the .production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would • result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 77 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Im ad Impact d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off=site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) V) the capacity of existing or...planned .stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) V) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading,.excavating,..or..any.other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement, of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (B MPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 78 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 27 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially NlAh Than PP g Significant Mitigation Signifipnt No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Encompass Associates (August, 4, 2014), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: • 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies. specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or_.off_-site_as__a_ result of_this. project will _be corrected. through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. . 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: • 1) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Encompass Associates (August, 4, Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 79 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact .2014)to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be-submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to-existing and proposed storm drain facilities, which will be been designed to handle the flows.. The project design includes landscaping of all non- hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All.runoff will be conveyed.to existing storm.drain.facilities, which .have.been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed.on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to-handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 80 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 29 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially Witt) ThanIssues and SupportingInformation Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No -impact incorporated I act Impact event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under ® the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100 year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is. substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. • Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 81 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 30 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco rated Impact Impact 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project. a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land,use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) V) regulation- of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th and is surrounded by residential development to the north, east and west and by a future City park site to the south. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north, east and west. The project will take access from Madrone Avenue and become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Medium (M) residential. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The applicant proposes a multi- family development that is consistent with the land use designation for the site. As such, no impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: _a) ...__ _ Result in.the loss of availability_of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) V) resource that would.be of value to the region.and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) V) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a.State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. Rev 8-18-1.4 Item G-H 82 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map'SUTPM18976 Page 31 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: FotentiWith ThanPP g Significaantnt With Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? • f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. No adverse impacts expected b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. Construction related vibration may create short term noise and vibration impacts. As such, no impacts are anticipated. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 - - Transportation/Traffic, it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. As such, no impacts are anticipated: d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during.a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. ® 2) Construction or grading noise.levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 83 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 32 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Signifcant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Impact may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise.,mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. - - f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) V) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,. necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () ( ) () V) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce significant population growth. The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will include the construction of 31 detached multi-family residences which equates to approximately 92 net residents based on 2.98 persons per household (household size based on 2010 U.S. Census). Although the project will increase the population growth in the area, there will be a less than significant impact as the project is consistent with the Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 84 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 33 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorponitted Impact Impact underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation. The density was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. Construction activities at the site will be short- term and will not attract a significant number of new employees to the area. No significant impacts are anticipated. b) The project will require the removal of 2 existing single-family residences. The displaced units will be replaced with 31 detached multi-family residences, thus increasing the total housing stock within the City. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. C) The project will require the removal of 2 existing single-family residences. The displaced units will be replaced with 31 detached multi-family residences, thus increasing the total housing stock within the City. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) C) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( } (✓) d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓} Comments: a) The site, located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street, would be served by Fire Station #172 (9612 San Bernardino Road) which is located approximately 2 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on-the project to- lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) The additional residential units may lead to a slight increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection or facilities are not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. C) The Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve • the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 85 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 34 Less Than Significant Less. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wu, Tnan pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated _Impact Impact d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Bear Gulch Park (9094 Arrow Route), is located approximately 1 mile from the project site. Additionally, a new park is plan for the parcel directly to the south of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is,in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga: The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions for the collection of development impact fees, the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. , 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase. the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) M regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) V) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Bear Gulch Park (9094 Arrow Route), is located approximately 1 mile from the project site. Additionally, there is a new City park planned for the-parcel to the south of the project site. The project proposes the construction of 31 detached multi-family -- residences which will increase the use of parks and other recreational facilities within the City. The project is consistent with the density of development anticipated for the development district and will not overburden the existing and proposed recreational facility within the City. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 86 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 35 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially wah Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco rated Impact Impact 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and. non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other• standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) D Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 337 vehicle trips daily per the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) trip generation model. The proposed project includes the development of detached residences. Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) trip generation model estimates that each detached-residence will generate 10.87 trips.daily. _. . As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The ITE trip generation model also estimates that each detached residence will generate .75 two-way peak hour trips daily. Projects that generate more than 100 two-way peak hour trips are considered by the City to have a significant impact on the environment. The project is estimated to create 23.25 two-way peak hour trips, and will thus not create a significant impact on the environment. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in the project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, ® gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 87 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 36 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and SupportingInformation Sources: Significant Mitigation Signfieant No Impact Incorporated Im aet Impact improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan. (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. With adherence to these programs, no impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all. emergency vehicles. during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project is within walking distance of public transportation and bicycle parking is available in each unit's enclosed garage. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project. a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water.or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of--which- could--cause significant environmental effects? - - - - C) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) V) water drainage facilities or expansion. of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) V) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) .Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) V) provider,'which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected . demand in addition to the providers existing commitments? Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 88 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 37 ® Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to accommodate the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality • Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated_ f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 89 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976.. Page 38 Less Than Significant Less PotentiallyWith Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate. important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed.._ A General Biological Assessment (Natural Resources Assessment, Inc., August 2014) was performed on the project site and found that nesting bird habitat exists on the site, and there are potential impacts to nesting birds from the removal of trees. The report recommended that if tree removal occurs during nesting season (February 1 through August 31), that a bird survey be conducted. A mitigation measure has been added in the Biological Resources section of the study. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan. was.adopted.along..with,the certification.of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that- adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 90 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 39 construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased construction noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than- significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive(check all that apply): (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update ® (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) Technical Appendences (see disc) (T) LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (T) Arborist Report(Steve Andresen, September 28, 2014) (T) General Biological Assessment(Natural Resources Assessment, Inc., August 4, 2104) (T) Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report(August 14, 2014) (T) Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis (Vista Environmental, July 29, 2014) (T) Water Quality Management Plan (Encompass Associates, August 8, 2014) • Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 91 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM18976 Page 40 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no si nificant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: / ���-� � Date: Print Name and Title: Ptzz- - 4/ « r-1 P� Tf" ��—/- Rev 8-18-14 Item G-H 92 aCity of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18976 and Development Review DRC2014-00570 This Mitigation Monitoring Program(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration forthe above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in-the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management-The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation)that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants'fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Item G-H 93 Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTT18976 and DRC2014=00570. Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or.responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at.the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.Planning Department..-The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee)with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on themitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to knowwhether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Item G-H 94 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (•INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTT18976 and DRC2014-00570 Applicant: Commerce Construction Co., LP Initial Study Prepared by: Tabe van der Zwaaa, Associate Planner Date: December 11, 2014 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible: Monitoring Timing of Method.of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Fre uenc Verification `Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance - .. ..: "r .._. .. .- .. ..... .. ..,.., Nf. ' - +,. .iii -S S to r -�• l - er' •_ Short Term (Construction) Emissions 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained BO C During construction A/C 2/4 in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. CD 3 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, PD/BO C Review plans prior C 2 the developer shall submit Construction Plans to issuance of = to the City denoting the proposed schedule grading permits and projected equipment use. Construction "' contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff.. 3) All.paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance BO B Review of plans A/C 2 standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. Page 1 of 12 Mitigation Measures No.l Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for implementing Action for Monitorin Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliances 5) All construction equipment shall comply with BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 roads. • Phase grading to prevent the . BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work eriods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering ractices. 3 0 Sweep streets according to a schedule BO C During construction A 4 0 established by the City if silt is carried 2 over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high BO C During construction A 4 • winds (i.e., . wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with; SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard BO C During Construction A 4 ratio on soils haul trucks:. or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved. by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB)) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemica1 soil-stabilizers (approved by B0 C During construction A � 4 AQMD andRWQCB shall be a lied to all Page 2 of 12 i Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Fre uency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize Bp C Review of plans A/C 4 electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Bp C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Long Term Emissions 1) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all PD B Review of plans C 2 entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 2) Provide preferential parking to high PD B Review of plans C 2 occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 3) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during PD B Review of plans C 2 off-peak hours. 4 Improve thermal integrity of the-buildings and Review of plans_ ) p 9 Y 9 PD B p C 2 reduce thermal load, with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 5) Landscape with native and/or; drought- PD B Review of plans C 2 resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 6) Provide lighter color roofing ;and road PIDg Review of plans C 2 materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 7) All residential and commercial structures shall PD & BD C Review of plans be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low- polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 8) All residential and commercial structures shall PD & BD C Review of plans be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Page 3 of 12 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for ImTwith for Monitorin Fre uenc Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Com liance hNa?. $°:,. •toPD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 inghe Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not.be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles; from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent ;survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor;nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. 2) Open wrought iron fencing with pilasters shall PD/BO C Review of report A/D. 3/4 be used along the south property line to 0 protect the eucalyptus windrow located just south of the ro'ect site. _ _z. ,i:: .. 3_3'. r r.:.. ." r:i'ri:K.��-jW +S:)':000. t�`;. '}tt�x`{i t.. } '•4a•.T ,Xj:.tia7)' i 1 B•^=d;: 's. ,�,ir s.`l .),�, •- - ::'a,,.s<y.t. ' ,i.�. ,¢'.k,. €�, r d co ::,, :';'+ai,. s .t�.,sdi? ��: t>;, t+. p' .w i•- e6 .,�!;� 1 t.y"r +'.'- :?r`. (q`: ,,jt :fit, '�3. {)"F !: t!• ,'-, li' y`•br.�'� 5� ' ..:'6: w• :T �...1 �;f5 i {� }r' f.''ti� ,. , .bf ry� CnYi.n'...,-.„';�;1�Y l' s7"i:�&:' •`. F y 1 N• s v r_ Y :i'` ,`:'4" 11 - `•e.: 1�i•Lism"•a !_t r.: .i!�'` '?�fi� 3h S.- s. i 1.) If any prehistoric archaeological' resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact 'interim measures to protect PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 undesignated sites from 'demolition or significant modification . without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 require incorporation of archaeological Page 4 of 12 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance sites within new .developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with P/D B/C Review of A/D . Section 21083.2 Archeological Plans/Report During resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse Construction project effects on significant,' important, and unique prehistoric 'resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying ;an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed 3 mitigation of resources within'the project 0 area. Submit one copy of the completed = report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological to Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or PD B Review of report A/D 4 animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve .them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained PD B Review of report A/D 4 and equipped to allow the rapid removal Page 5 of 12 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time ;during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should.fossils be found within an area BO B/C Review of report A/D:. 4 being cleared or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery,,the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all PD D Review of report D 3 recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository 1 (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of PD D Review of report D 3 Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected 3 specimens with a copy to the report to 0 San Bernardino Count Museum. _ h"^ .:y :.n:l x!- -.zv r{F•9 i .,.;,. .5.-,- EYg... ••s"I`'it' .fi^r# ..i> 'rt%.t�.i y.:.�• ML �' ':.E:.._ : 'si 4'" "Y JFtir nit' .a G'�a" g' v�.';: :'�R esti:`. vt§' .'J ;. ?�" 11 K tfi-.. +3,•(` ,.:E. aT•+r" F rsl,a N _,bk3 �3, �?:' 'c+ � " n .'': : 3' �' +"; r fc • a �NOW- 06S :Sect °n.lJ<•�e.Y 0 S _ i �A{ wFti::4F9k. s 6�}i •'a+i•_ 3l0 � F .c.1t tl YAM , .<. ..::: .y., �:d..7w�k:....moi: ..e�',s. 0 1) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re=planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public. streets shall be swept BO C During construction A 4 according. to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMio emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site:. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when BO C During construction A 4 wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMio emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to Page 6 of 12 Mitigation Measures No.l Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of. Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. r.: a is S.�:c 4•• i. Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all' rules that BO C During construction A 4 assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting' disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contactor shall select BO C During construction A 4 construction equipment based , on low- emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will CD be tuned and maintained in accordance with 0 the manufactures' specification. 2 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more BO C During construction A 4 o than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be BO C During construction A 4 utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to BO C During construction A 4 interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be BO C During construction A 4 supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 1) Construction and Building materials shall be BO A During Construction C 2 produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. Page 7 of 12 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for implementing Action for Monitoring Fre ency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 2) Design all buildings to exceed California BO A During Construction C 2 Building Code Title 24 energy; standard including but not limited to any combination of: Increased insulation Limit air leakage through the structure Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements 3 0 _ . Install solar or light emitting diodes o (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing. water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless Page 8 of 12 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and CE A Review of plans C 2 demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Section 9 — Hazards and Waste Materials 1) The developer shall provide future PD B Separate Submittal B 3 homeowners with written notification at the time of purchase that the project site is within the LA/Ontario International Airport Influence Area and is subject to increase overhead noise levels. W fD B 2 Section 9 —Hydrology and Water Quality � 0 `A) Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the Page 9 of 12 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Im lementin Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. Review of plans A/C 214 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, BO B/C/D streetcleaning will be performed prior to 3 storm events and after the use of water 0 trucks to control dust in order to prevent 2 discharge of debris or sediment from the o site. 5) The.developer shall implement the BMPs BO B/CID Review of plans A/C 2/4 identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by PBLA Engineering (May, 20, 2014) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2/4 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas-shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including,monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall 'be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Page 10 of 12 • • • Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Com liance Grading Activities 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the Building Oficial for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant CD Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) n General Construction Storm Water Permit = from the State Water Resources Control o Board. Evidence that this has been obtained "' (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 1) Construction or grading shall not take place BO C During construction A 4 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not BO C During construction A 4 exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall Page 11 of 12 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible. Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed PD C -During construction A A as early as possible in the first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place PO/BO C During construction A 4/7 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on, weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the B developer shall prepare a noise mitigation 0 plan denoting any construction traffic haul 2 routes. To the.extent feasible, the plan shall c denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations ut.,....: ;•,y: s+ e:..'.fT47TrtC':75.�':'- "-:`57.yr< "•';L,&si9 .:a#:e{4. r •..�. a^ - .. ,• - -+c; xsz�sr.-1 ,F.: �.,;?7F.,rg,., ' lj�iu" j "ja.:[°' ;,,.ti i:i, 7 .. M� ,.. :- �9 .;. ,< x. j� 05. ,g.r. fi *.s. `tyIrlo. ng iegU rlcjl.,' , > 4. �� .t�.t+.r.+.r :. ^�.c.� :' ,:, .t�.,r^,•;.,.v Rpbn bl P� , ..0 rr �-�; :.. �."` � :. :�._. x_r,.. :.,, s , ti = N, 1 -Withhold Recordation oYFinal Map CDD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection PD-Planning Director or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO-Building.Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Police Captain.or designee E-Operating. 5.-Retain Deposit or Bonds 6-Revoke CUP FC-,Fire Chief or designee 7-Citation Page 12 of 12 btate or uautorrna-Natural Resources Agency EDMUND G BROWN Jr Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H.BONHAM,Director. _ 1 Inland Deserts Region ' 3602.Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-220 Ontario;CA 91764 ` (909)484-0459 www.wildlife.ca.gov January 15, 2015: Mr. Tabe van der Zwaag Associate'Planner._. --- City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P.O:.Box 807 Rancho.Cucamonga, CA 91729 Subject: Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18976 and Design Review DRC2014-00570 Project State Clearinghouse No. 2014121081 Dear Mr. Van der Zwaag: The Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study(IS).and Mitigated Negative Declaration(MND).for the Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18976 and Development Review DRC2014-00570 Project (Project) [State Clearinghouse No. 20141.21081]. The Department is responding to the IS and MND as. a Trustee Agency for fish and wildlifer resources (Califomia Fish and Game:Code Sections 711.7 and 1802,. and the California Environmental.Quality Act [CEQA] Guidelines Section 15386), and as a Responsible Agency regarding any discretionary actions(CEQA Guidelines Section 15381.), such as the issuance of a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement (California Fish and Game Code Sections 1600 et seq.) and/or a California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Permit for Incidental Take of Endangered, Threatened, and/or Candidate species (California Fish and Game Code Sections 2080 and 2080.1). Project Description The Project is located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and - - 9th Street, in the City of Rancho.Cucamonga (City), County of San.Bernardino, California; Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) 0207-262-01, 02,. and 03. The City proposes to subdivide a 3:2-acre parcel and to develop 31 detached condominiums, including associated infrastructure and recreational amenities, Conserving Caffornia's Wifif f' e Since .1870 EXH1131T ® Item G-H 107 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18976 and Development Review DRC2014-00570 Project SCH:No. 2014121081 Page 2 of 4.- Biological Resources and Impacts The CEQA document should include recent biological survey data.(CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(a)). The CEQA document should also address species of special concernand federal critical.habitat. If state or federal threatened or endangered species may occur within the project area, species specific surveys,,conducted at the appropriate time of year and time of day, should be included with-the CEQA.dacunlent. If species.specific.surveys are not conducted, the Department recommends that the Lead Agency assume the presence of the species throughout the project site. Acceptable species specific surveys have been:developed by the Department; and by the.U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,and are accessible through each a9encies.websites. Surveys for Burrowing Owl should follow the Department's 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation(2012:Staff Report); available for download here:. hftp://www.dfq..ca-gov/wildlife/nongame/sury6y monitor.html Following review of the Biological Resources section of the IS, the Department identified a number of questions, comments and concerns, and requests that each of these be addressed prior to adoptionof the proposed.MND. The:Department's questions,. comments, and concerns include: 1. The CEQA document.identifies suitable habitatfor burrowing owl within the project area, and the Califomia Natural.Diversity Database includes records of burrowing owls located within three miles of the project site. Based:on this information, in the,Departrne4s,opinion, the potential for owls to occur within the. project site and particularly to forage.within the project site is high. Therefore the project has the potential to cause the loss of nesting and/or foraging habitat for' burrowing owl. Please note that it is the Project proponent's responsibility to comply with all applicable laws relatedto nesting birds and birds of prey. Migratory non-game. native bird species are protected by international treaty under the federal Migratory. Bird Treaty Act,(MBTA)of 1918, as amended (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.).- In addition, sections 3503.,..3503.5, and 3513 of the Fish and Game Code (FGC) stipulate the following: Section 3503 states that it is unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly-destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise provided by FGC or any regulation made pursuant thereto;.Section:3503.5 states that is it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes(birds-of-prey)or to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs:of any such bird except as otherwise provided by FGC or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto; and Section 3513 states that it is unlawful to take,or possess any migratory nongame bird as designated in the MBTA or any part of such migratory nongame bird except as provided by-rules and regulations adopted by the Secretary of the Interior under provisions of the MBTA. Item G-H 108 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Tentative:Tract Map SUBTT18976 and Development Review DRC2014-00570 Project SCH No. 2014121081 Page 3 of 4 Take of individual burrowing.owls and their nests is defined by FGC section 86, and prohibited by sections.3503,. 3503.5 and 3513. Take is defined in FGC Section 86as "hunt, pursue, catch, capture or kill,.or attempt to hunt, pursue; catch, capture or kill." CEQA requires public agencies in California to analyze and disclose potential envimmentaFimpactsassoclatedfwitt ca project theltthe-agencywilfcarry-out,- fund, or approve. Any potentially significant impact must be:mitigated to the extent feasible. Due to lack of information on a:mitigation plan to.offset impacts to the potential loss of burrowing owl nesting and/or foraging habitat, the Department is unable to: determine whether the impacts would be:mitigated, and cannot;.without further information from the City concur that the project would have no significant impacts to burrowing owl. The Department recommends that the.City follow the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report.on Burrowing. Owl Mitigation(Department of Fish.and.Game, March 2012 ; available;for download from the Department's website: • htti)s://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/survey monitor html. The Department expects that the City will follow the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation, which specifies that the steps for project impact evaluations. include: . a-. A habitat assessment;: b. Surveys; and. c. An impact assessment As stated in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation, the three progressive steps are effective in evaluating whether a project will result in impacts to burrowing owls, and the information gained from the steps will inform any subsequent avoidance,: minimization, and.mitigation measures. Habitat assessments are conducted to evaluate.the likelihood that a site supports burrowing owl. Burrowing owl surveys provide information.needed to determine. the potential effects of proposed projects and activities on burrowing owls, and toy avoid take in accordance with FGC sections 86, 3503; and 3503.5. Impact assessments evaluate the extent to which burrowing owls and their habitat may be impacted, directly or indirectly, on and.within a reasonable distance of'a: proposed CEQA project activity or non-CEQA project. To reduce potential impacts to burrowing.owl to a level.less than significant the • Department recommends that the City revise the CEQA document, prior to adoption of the MND, to incorporate information gained from the implementation Item G-H 109 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Tentative Tract Map 5UBTT18976 and Development Review DRC2O14-00570 Project. SCH No. 201412108.1 Page 4 of 4 of the three progressive steps outlined above. If burrowing owls and/or their habitat may be impacted from the project, the Department recommends that.the. City include-specific.mitigation in the CEQA.document: Please note that mitigation must be roughly proportional to the level of impacts, including- cumulative ncludingcumulative impacts; in accordance with the provisions of.CEQA (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15126.4(a)(4)(B), 15064, 15065, and 16355). Furthermore, in order for mitigation measures to be effective;they must:be specific;enfb.rceable and feasible actions that will improve environmental conditions. Current scientific literature supports.the conclusion that mitigation for permanent burrowing owl habitat loss necessitates replacement with an equivalent or greater habitat area for breeding, foraging;.wintering, dispersal.,presence.of burrows, burrow surrogates, presence of fossorial mammal dens, well drained soils, and abundant and available prey within close proximity to the burrow: 2. Regarding.Mitigation Measure 1 under Section 4- Biological.Resources, the IS states that for the purposes of the MND, the:breeding bird season.includes "...February 1. through August-31". Because not all species.adhere to these. nesting.dates, the Department encourages;the Lead Agency to complete!nesting bird surveys regardless of time of year to ensure compliance with all applicable laws related to nesting birds and.birds of prey. The Department recommends that the City revise Mitigation Measure 1, Section 4, and require avian surveys, regardlessof time of year, to ensure that the project complies with all federal, state, and local laws... The Department appreciates;the opportunity to comment on the IS and proposed MND for the Tentative:Tract Map SUBTT18976 and Development Review DRC2O14=00570 Project (SCH No. 201412108.1), and requests that the City address the Department's comments and concerns prior to adoption of the MND. If you should have any questions pertaining to.these comments, please contact Gabriele Quillman at(909) 980-3818 or at gabriele.quillman@wild.life.ca.gov. Sincerely, I ac air ti g Regional Manager cc; State Clearinghouse, Sacramento Literature Cited California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 2012_ Staff report on burrowing. owl. mitigation. State of California, Natural Resources Agency. Available: for download at: http://dfg.ca.govtwildlife/nongame/survey_nonitor.htmt Item G-H 110 City of Rancho Cucamonga • MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No::-:SUBTT18976 and DRC2014-00570=: Public Review Period Closes: January'28, 2015 Project Name: Project Applicant: Crestwood Communities Project Location(also see attached map): Located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street-APN: 0207-262-01, 02, and 03. Project Description: A request to subdivide a 3.2-acre site and'to develop 31 detached condominiums for a site that is made up of three parcels which includes two existing single-family residences that will be removed as part of the project. FINDING • This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909)477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. • January 28, 2015 Date of Determination Adopted By Item G-H 111 RESOLUTION NO. 15-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976, A REQUEST FOR A SUBDIVISION OF AIRSPACE FOR 31 DETACHED RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS FOR A 3.2 ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MADRONE AVENUE BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND 9TH STREET WITHIN THE MEDIUM (M) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APNS 0207-262-01, 02 AND 03. A. Recitals. 1. Crestwood Communities filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18976 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of January 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. ® NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 28, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street within the Medium (M) Development District; and b. . ..The project site is approximately 350 feet from north to south and 369 feet from east to west and is comprised of.three parcels; and C. The site is relatively flat and contains 26 trees; nine (9) were determined in the arborist report(Andresen, September 2014)to be heritage tress, as classified by the Development Code. The location and condition of the trees prevent them from being incorporated into the new project and all the existing trees will be removed. The Landscape.Plan includes the planting of 153 new trees, mitigating the loss of the removed trees; and d. To the east and west are multi-family developments within the Medium (M) Development District. To the north are multiple lots developed with single-family residence within the Medium (M) Development District. To the south is a future park site developed with multiple vacant structures; and Item G-H 112 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-06 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 2 e. The project complies with all related development criteria of the Medium (M) • Development District including project density,setbacks, parking, private and common open space areas and recreation facilities. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,and any applicable specific plans in that the project site is residentially zoned and is being subdivided for residential purposes. The project site is being developed with 31 detached condominiums with.a. project density of 10.3 dwelling units per acre,within the permitted density range of 8 to 14 units per acre. b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans in that the proposed parcels are being subdivided for residential condominium.purposes and will be of similar size and density to those in the surrounding area. C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed in that the project is designed to conform to all of the requirements of the Medium (M) Development District and there is an existing public street and utility services available to service the project site. d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental • damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat in that the Initial Study prepared for the project includes mitigation measures that reduce any potential impacts to humans or wildlife to less than significant. e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems in that the lots are being subdivided for residential condominium purposes which does not include the use of hazardous materials that would cause public health problems. f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision as the subject property does not contain any preexisting access that would limit subdivision of the site. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for - -the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment • period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Item-G-H 113 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-06 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 3 ® b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to approving the requested Tentative Tract entitlement. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. • Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of airspace on a"3.2-acre site for the development of 31 detached residential condominium units located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street in the Medium (M) Development District--APN: 0207-262-01, 02,and 03. 2) Approval of the project is conditioned on the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00736 for the removal of 9 Heritage trees on the project site. 3) Prior to the recordation of the Final Map,.all organizational documents for the project including Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department and the City Attorney. The applicant shall be responsible for costs associated with the review of these documents. The approved CC&Rs shall be recorded prior to, or concurrently with, recordation of the final map. A copy of the final documents shall be submitted to the Community Development Department within five (5) days after their recordation. These provisions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a) Individual residences shall be available for private ownership, • and that all common areas (i.e., not for exclusive use by the owner of the residence) shall be commonly owned. Item G-H 114 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-06 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 4 b) The private open space areas are the walled side yards and a walled courtyard. All other areas within the project are maintained by the Home Owners Association. c) No residence in the development shall be sold unless a Property Owners Association has been legally formed with the right to assess all these properties which are jointly owned or benefited to operate and maintain all other mutually available features of the development including, but not limited to, building features and amenities, parking lot, landscaping, and utilities, etc. d) The City shall be included as a party to the CC&Rs for enforcement purposes of those CC&R provisions in which the City has interest, as reflected in the following provisions. However, the City shall not be obligated to enforce the CC&Rs. e) The requirement that association bylaws be established. f) Provisions for effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair, and maintenance of all common areas and facilities including but not limited to, common recreation facilities, landscaped areas, walls and fences, parking lot(i.e., walkways, sidewalks, driveways), underground water supply, fire lanes, water quality control features, etc. In addition, the CC&Rs shall indicate the maintenance obligations and reciprocal easements related to the reciprocal and shared facilities, including, but not limited to, provisions for a reciprocal agreement for the maintenance and use of the on-site fire protection (fire hydrant). Statements noting these agreements, easements,etc.,shall also be included on the Final Map. g) Membership in the Property Owner's Association shall be inseparable from ownership of individual residences. h) Architectural controls shall be provided and may include, but not be limited to, provisions regulating exterior finishes, roof materials, fences and walls, accessory structures, exterior . ..... . .. ..... . mechanical equipment, etc., consistent -_.Wi -" --the Rancho Cucamonga'Development Code: - i) Maintenance standards shall be provided for applicable items listed in Section e. Examples of maintenance standards are shown below: i) All common area landscaping shall be properly maintained such that they are evenly cut, evenly edged,free of bare or brown spots, debris, and weeds. All trees and shrubs shall be trimmed so they do not impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic. Trees shall be pruned so they do not intrude into the neighboring properties-and shall be maintained so they do not have droppings or create other nuisances to the Item G-H 115 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-06 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 5 ® neighboring properties. All trees shall also be root pruned to eliminate exposed surface roots and damage to sidewalks, driveways, and structures. ii) All site features shall be maintained so that they are safe for users. Significant pavement cracks; pavement distress, excessive slab settlement, abrupt vertical variations, and debris on travel ways shall be removed or repaired promptly. iii) Common areas shall be maintained in such a manner as to avoid the reasonable determination of a duly authorized official of the City that a public nuisance has been created by the absence of adequate maintenance such as to be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare. j) No amendment to alter, modify,terminate, or change the Property Owners Association's obligation to maintain the common areas or other CC&R provisions in which the City has an interest, as noted above, or to alter, modify, terminate, or change the City's right to enforce maintenance of the common areas shall be permitted without the prior written approval of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. • 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances, Air Quality Short Term (Construction) Emissions 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit -- Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized,or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. Item G-H 116 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-06 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976-CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 6 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading-to.prevent the..susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. -8) - The construction contractor-'shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Long Term Emissions 1) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. . Item G-H 117 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-06 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 7 2) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 3) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 4) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 5) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 6) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 7) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 8) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources ® 1) Prior to approval of a Grading Permit, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either(a)the adult birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation;or(b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable.to verify one of the above conditions,then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. 2) Prior to approval of a Grading Permit, Burrowing Owl Survey that conforms to the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. 3) Open wrought iron fencing with pilasters shall be used along the south property line to protect the eucalyptus windrow located just south of the project site. Cultural Resources ® 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect Item G-H 118 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-06 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 8 or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing` provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point: Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting" the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay,to the site full-time during the,interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing.activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). •. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Item G-H 119 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-06 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 • Page 9 Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gasses Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions • 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4 terhatiVe -fuel powered' equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-or diesel=powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured. locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as Item G-H,120 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-06 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 10 materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: •. Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and.waterless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior-storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public _ areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hazards and Waste Materials 1) The developer shall provide future homeowners with written notification at the time of purchase that the project site is within the LA/Ontario International Airport Influence Area and is subject to increase overhead noise levels. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activity. Item G-H 121 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-06 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 11 • 1 Prior to issuance of Grading Permits,the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval,a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a)Specify the timing of.grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b)An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. • 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by PBLA Engineering (May, 20, 2014) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be - - - -- submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. Grading Activities 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Item G-H 122 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-06 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 12 Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained(i.e.,a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays,.including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050,as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above'standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m.on weekdays, including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes.- To the extent --- --- feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that.do not pass-sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Item G-H 123 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-06 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 13 BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho.Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • Item G-H 124 Conditions of Apptoval • RINCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE -020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 2. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The-.City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant ofhis'obligations under this condition. 0 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. ` or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. 5. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 6. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not-issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. B. Engineering Services Department 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical except for 66 kv) on the project side of Madrone Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite the northerly property boundary to the first pole offsite the southerly property boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement ® agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. Printed:1/14/2015 www.CityofRC.us Item G-H 125 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne . by the developer. 3. Transitions to offsite existing conditions to-the north and to the south from project boundaries shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Parcel Map 16141 has installed the storm drain and related improvements along 9th Street from Lanyard Court to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The developer of Parcel Map 16141 is eligible for reimbursement to recover the proportionate cost of the storm drain installation. The fair share amount has been determined per approved Reimbursement Agreement dated August 27, 2007, City File DRA-37, which shall be paid prior to final map approval or building permit issuance, whichever comes first. The approved amount last August 2007 for this development is $ 65,732.13 which shall be increased at a rate of 10% per year. 5. Madrone Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local Street" standards as required and including: a. Provide curb, property line sidewalk and street trees, as required. b. Provide commercial driveway approaches. for both drive aisles. North drive approach shall align with existing private street on opposite side of Madrone Avenue. c. Provide two(2)5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlights, as required. d. Provide traffic signing and striping, as required. e. The necessary right-of-way for Madrone Avenue is 30 feet, measured from the street centerline. 6. Pavement reconstruction and overlays up to the centerline of Madrone Avenue will be determined during plan check. .......... . 7. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 8. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CDA shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted. to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. ww.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 8 Printed:1/14/2015 w Item G-H 126 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities • Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 9. Dedication shall be made of the -following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 30 total feet on Madrone Avenue 10. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 11. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 12. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a .permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, • as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 14. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Madrone Avenue Curb& Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Curbside Drain Outlet _. 15. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 16. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. • 17. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. Q Printed:1/14/2015 www.QtyofRC.us Page 3 of 8 Item G-H 127 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location:. 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 18: Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic' signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval . or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be. obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps. for the disabled shall be installed on all ,comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by.the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 8 Printed:1/14/2015 Item G-H 128 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities • Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Enaineerina Services Department 19. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Madrone Avenue Botanical Name-Pinus canariensis Common Name-Canary Island Pine Min. Grow Space-7' Spacing- 35'0.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 20. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 21. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 22. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided.as..required. 23. The City is willing to consider installation of a private storm drain lateral across adjacent property to the south, which is owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for public park purposes. Such a facility would need to be designed to accommodate all private flows south of Arrow Route and be located along the north and east edges of the future park site in a private drainage easement. Development would pay all costs for installing the private storm drain from the existing pubic storm drain at the southeast corner of the park site to the north project boundary. A developer-to-developer reimbursement agreement would allow sharing of the costs among benefiting properties. Developer shall also provide a legal description for the offsite drainage easement and provide a private drainage easement in favor of properties to the north on the final tract map. �24. Amount of parking spaces shall be in accordance with Development Code Section 17.64. Printed:1/14/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page s of a Item G-H 129 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- C. ROJECT.C. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit 1. See SUBTT case for B&S and FCS conditions E. Grading Section 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report. shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and 'wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. ..... _... 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a '100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. . All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of ,way or adjacent private property. www.CityofRC.us Page s of a Printed:1/14/2015 Item G-H 130 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities ® Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 13. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 14. Private streets for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 15. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 16. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 17. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 18. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification • Number(WDID). 19. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the- Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 20. Prior to- issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls. along the property boundary the structural 'calculations for the wall shall assume a level .toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 21. Prior to issuance. of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 22. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent or to constructing warts along work on the adjacent property. J property owner(s) allowing 23. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 24. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 25. The precise grading and drainage plan- shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". • Printed:1/14/2015 WWW.CityOfRC.us 'Page 7 of 8 Item G-H 131 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 26. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by . the„__. project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about' grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector, b) The grading _ contractor shall call. into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading nicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Tech original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 27. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of .record shall certify the functionality . of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 28. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 29. Reciprocal access easements for - all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintehance of .all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP). devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CCBR's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in -the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 8 Printed:1/14/2015 - Item G-H 132 RESOLUTION NO. 15-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00570, SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 31- UNIT, RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON 3.2 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MADRONE AVENUE BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND 9TH STREET WITHIN THE MEDIUM (M) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0207-262-01, 02, AND 03. A. Recitals. 1. Crestwood Communities filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2014-00570 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of January 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 28, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street in the Medium (M) Development District; b. The project site is approximately 350 feet from north to south and 369 feet from east to west and is comprised of three parcels; C. The site is relatively flat and contains 26 trees; nine (9) were determined in the arborist report(Andresen, September 2014)to be heritage tress, as classified by the Development Code. The location and condition of the trees prevent them from being incorporated into the new project, and all the existing trees will be removed. The Landscape Plan includes the planting of 153 new trees, mitigating the loss of the removed trees; d. To the east and west are multi-family developments within the Medium (M) Development District. To the north are multiple lots developed with single-family residence within the • Medium (M) Development District. To the south is a future.park site developed with multiple vacant structures; Item G-H 133 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-07 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00570—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 2 e. The project complies with all related development criteria of the Medium (M) Development District including project density, building design, setbacks, parking, private and common open space areas, landscape coverage, and recreation facilities. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan in that the project site is residentially zoned and is being subdivided for residential purposes. The. project site is being developed with 31 detached condominiums with a project density of 10.3 dwelling units per acre, within the permitted density range of 8 to 14 units per acre. b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located in that the proposed parcels are being subdivided for residential purposes and will be of similar size and density to those in the surrounding area. C. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code including project density, setbacks, parking, private and common open space areas and recreation facilities. d. That the proposed design,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity in that the lots will be used for residential development in accord with the Medium (M) development district and will provide adequate parking and recreational facilities. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written'and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial-evidence-that the project would have a significant effect on the-environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to approving the requested Design Review entitlement. Item G-H 134 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-07 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00570—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 3 C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is to subdivide the 3.2-acre project site for the development of a 31-unit detached condominium located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street in the Medium (M) Development District-APN: 0207-262-01, 02 and 03. • 2) Decorative concrete paving shall be provided for all ribbon drains within the drive aisles. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 4) Prior to approval of a Grading Permit, Burrowing Owl Survey that conforms to the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. . ....... ........ .. Air Quality Short Term (Construction) Emissions 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. • 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide Item G-H 135 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-07 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00570—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 4 evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized,or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances anduse sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum-24-inch-freeboard ratio on.soils haul trucks _ ... _--_ or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rple 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. Item G-H 136 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-07 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00570—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 • Page 5 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Long Term Emissions 1) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 2) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 3) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 4) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 5) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. • 6) Provide .lighter color roofing and road materials and tree. planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 7) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 8) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources 1) Prior to approval.of a_Grading.Permit, a breeding bird survey that is in .conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either(a)the adult birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation;or(b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions,then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. • 2) Open wrought iron fencing with pilasters shall be used along the south property line to protect the eucalyptus windrow located just south of the project site. Item G-H 137 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-07 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00570—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 6 Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of-the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects. on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for.study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide _._.___. specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation. monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay,to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert 4. construction and notify the monitor of the find. Item G-H 138 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-07 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00570—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 • Page 7 Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1).. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2). Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. ® 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gasses Short Tenn (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. .--- -- 2) -- The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based ori low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. ® 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. Item G-H 139 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-07 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00570—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES. January 28, 2015 Page 8 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, . • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade,prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare'a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water _.... _ .._. Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets,dual flush toilets, and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. Item G-H 140 . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-07 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00570—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 9 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hazards and Waste Materials 1) The developer shall provide future homeowners with written notification at the time of purchase that the project site is within the LA/Ontario International Airport Influence Area and is subject to increase overhead noise levels. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activity 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading • Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading.- This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum:a)Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b)An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During.construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by PBLA Engineering (May, 20, 2014) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical • 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped Item G-H 141 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-07 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00570—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January 28, 2015 Page 10 areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. Grading Activities 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain. system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines. for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits,the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained(i.e.,a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in-Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code - - ---Section 17.66.050:- Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m..and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays,'including Saturday, or at any Item G-H 142 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-07 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00570—CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES January28, 2015 ® Page 11 time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item G-H 143 Conditions of Approval jZANC OSCI-10G &ONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 2. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers; or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. ®3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties. involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project ,in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. 5. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 6. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or-=approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. B. Engineering Services Department 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical except for 66 kv) on the project side of Madrone Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite the northerly property boundary to the first pole offsite the southerly property boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement • agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/14/2015 Item G-H 144 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; B. Engineering Services Department 2. A signed consent and waiver form to' join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever.. occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. Transitions to offsite existing conditions to-the north and to the south from project boundaries shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Parcel Map 16141 has installed the storm drain and related improvements along 9th Street from Lanyard Court to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The developer of Parcel Map 16141 is eligible for reimbursement to recover the proportionate cost 'of- the storm drain installation. The fair share amount has been determined per. approved Reimbursement Agreement dated August 27, 2007, City File ORA-37, which shall be paid prior to final map approval or building permit issuance, whichever comes first. The approved amount last August 2007 for this development is $ 65,732.13 which shall be increased at.a rate of 10% per year. 5. Madrone Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local Street" standards as required and including: a. Provide curb, property line sidewalk and street trees, as required. b. Provide commercial driveway approaches for both drive aisles. North drive approach shall align with existing private street on opposite side of Madrone Avenue. c. Provide two(2)5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlights, as required. d. Provide traffic signing and striping, as required. e. The necessary right-of-way for Madrone Avenue is 30 feet, measured from the street centerline. 6. Pavement reconstruction and overlays up to the centerline of Madrone Avenue will be determined during plan check 7. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building. Permit issuance if no map-is involved. -8. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. wwwZtyofRc.us Printed:1!1412015 Page 2 of 8 - Item G-H 145 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities ® Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. ROJECT.B. Enaineerin4 Services Department 9. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 30 total feet on Madrone Avenue 10. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 11. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 12. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion. of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the' City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 14. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Madrone Avenue Curb& Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees _._.. __ _ __.. ... .. Curbside Drain Outlet 15. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 16. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. ® 17. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. Printed:1/14/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 8 Item G-H 146 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 6583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 18. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be. obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any. new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. wwwZtyofRC.us Page 4 of 8 Printed:1/14/2015 Item G-H 147 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 • Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Eng!nee ring.Services Department 19: Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." -Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Madrone Avenue Botanical Name-Pinus canariensis Common Name-Canary Island Pine Min. Grow Space-7' Spacing -35' O.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. •2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be fumished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 20. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 21. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 22. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas,' electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 23. The City is willing to consider installation of a private storm 'drain lateral across adjacent property to the south, which is owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for public park purposes. Such a facility would need to be designed to accommodate all private flows south of Arrow Route and be located along the north and east edges of the future park site in a private drainage easement. Development would pay all costs for installing the private storm drain from the existing pubic storm drain at the southeast corner of the park site to the north project boundary. A developer-to-developer reimbursement agreement would allow sharing of the costs among benefiting properties. Developer shall also provide a legal description for the offsite drainage easement and provide a private drainage easement in favor of properties to the north on the final tract map. •24. Amount of parking spaces shall be in accordance with Development Code Section 17.64. Printed:1/14/2015 www.QtyofRC.Us Page 5 of 8 Item G-H 148 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- C.. ROJECT.C.. Fire Prevention /New Construction Unit 1. See SUBTT case for B&S and FCS'conditions E. Grading Section 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement'design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review,that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year,• AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by ttie Engineer of Record. _. _. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. www.QtyofRC.us Page 6 of a Printed:1/14/2015 Item G-H 149 . Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 • Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 13. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 14. Private streets for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the. Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 15. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 16. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 17. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of 'Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 18. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 19. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Buildingand Safety ty Sernces Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 20. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 21. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 22. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 23 The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 24. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 25. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". • Printed:1/14/2015 www.CityOfRC.us Page 7 of 8 Item G-H 150 Project#: DRC2014-00570 CEQA2014-00006, SUBTT18976 Project Name: Crestwood Communities Location: 8583 ARROW RTE-020726201-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 26. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the;:.. project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about" grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building- Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request. the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit, iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 27. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 28. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 29. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels . and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the .WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Page a of a Printed:1/14/2015 Item G-H 151 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date: January 28, 2015 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission �,;UCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966 — MARC HOMES, LLC - A proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of 1.89 acre into eight (8) lots within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way, located at 13025 Base Line Road - APN: 1100-011-02. Related files: Development Review DRC2014-00645 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645 - MARC HOMES, LLC - A proposal to construct eight (8) single-family residences in conjunction with a subdivision of a vacant parcel of 1.89 acre into eight (8) lots within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way, located at. 13025 Base Line Road - APN: 1100-011-02. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581. Staff has prepared a Mitigated' Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00581 — MARC HOMES, LLC — A request to remove trees in conjunction with the subdivision of a vacant parcel of 1.89 acres into eight (8) lots and construction of eight (8) single-family residences within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way, located at 13025 Base Line Road - APN: 1100-011-02. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: . Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966, Development Review DRC2014-00645, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581 by adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan South- Single-Family Residences; Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan East - Condominium Complex; Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan West - Single-Family Residences; Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan Item I-K 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645,AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00581 —MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 2 B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Medium Residential North - Low Medium Residential South - Low Medium Residential East - Low Medium Residential West - Low Medium Residential C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a vacant property with an area of approximately 82,000 square feet (1.89 acres) located at the south side of Base Line Road. The project site is bound by Shelby Place and Emmett Way on the east and west sides, respectively (Exhibit B). The - overall dimensions of the site are approximately 270 feet (east to west) by approximately 300 feet (north to south). Immediately adjacent to the south side of the project site and to the west, on the opposite side of Emmett Way, are single-family residences (Tract 16454). To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels; on one of these parcels is a small single-family residence. To the east, on the opposite side of Shelby Place, is a condominium complex (Tract 16455, Brighton Etiwanda Condominiums). The zoning of the project and all the surrounding properties is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of approximately 1,291 feet and 1,285 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into eight (8) lots for a single-family residential development (Exhibit C). All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (Exhibit K). Individual lot areas range between 9,311 square feet (Lot_ 4) and 11,814 square feet (Lot 5), while the average lot area is 10,206. square feet. The required minimum lot area and minimum average lot area for lots in the zoning district of the project site are 7,200 square feet and 10,000 square feet, respectively. The depth of each lot will be between approximately 123 feet and approximately 147 feet, while the width of each lot at the required front setback will be between approximately 65 feet and 86 feet. The required minimum lot depth and minimum lot width for lots in the zoning district of the project site are. 100 feet and 60 feet, respectively. All lots will be conventional, i.e., rectangular in shape, which will allow conventional house plotting and have access to the existing public streets. As the property is generally level with no substantial slopes, there will not be a need for significant grading of the site. In conjunction with the proposed subdivision, the applicant proposes to construct a single-family.--- __. ._. residence on each lot for a total of eight (8) single-family residences. The floor areas of the houses (including the garages and covered patios) will range between 3,440 square feet (Plan 1) to 4,616 square feet (Plan 3). One-story houses are proposed on two (2) of the eight (8) lots, while two- story houses are proposed on the remainder of the lots. This equates to 25 percent of the lots having single-story houses. This mix of one- and two-story homes complies with Section 17.122.010 of the Development Code that requires at least 25 percent of the proposed houses to be single-story. All of the houses will have two garages — one, 2-car garage and one, 1-car garage. The 2-car garages will be setback from the front part of the house, while the 1-car garages will face the side yard, i.e., they are side entry garages. This will comply with Section 5.42.606 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan which requires that 50 percent of the garages be oriented or situated in a manner that minimizes its visual presence (as seen from the street). The house on Lot 1 will be two-story. Although Section 5.42.608 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan requires single-story houses on comer lots, it does allow for two-story houses as long as "extra deep Item I-K 2 E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645,AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00581 —MARC HOMES, LLC • January 28, 2015 Page 3 setbacks are provided." The proposed setback of the houses from Base Line Road is 45 feet (the required street side setback is 25 feet). The architecture of each house will generally be consistent with the design requirements outlined in Section 5.42.600 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The applicant proposes two (2) types of architectural themes (elevations) — Country French and Bungalow and six (6) footprints — Plans 1, 2, and 3, and reverse footprints of each (Exhibits F and G). Plan 1 will be one-story, while the others will be two-story. The number of available footprints will comply with Figure 5-45 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. There will be a variety of movement in the wall planes and roof lines. Each house will have a front entrance that includes either a partially enclosed courtyard- or a covered porch. Depending on the theme, a variety of materials will be incorporated into the architecture including stone veneer, wood siding, and stucco finish. There will also be details such as wood brackets/rafter tails at the roof eaves, decorative trim and shutters around some of the windows, corbels, molding along the top of the stone veneer wainscots, and decorative garage doors. Chimneys are not proposed. The roofing on all of the houses will be concrete tile. B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted on November 19, 2014, to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at St. Clare of Assisi Church located at 6563 East Avenue. There were several property owners and interested individuals in attendance (Exhibit 1). The attendees inquired about the travel route for construction-related traffic; homeowner parking, i.e., would each • home have private, off-street parking; public improvements associated with the project such as sidewalks; landscaping on the proposed lots; and the timing of the import of soil onto the site. The applicant and staff addressed these questions to the satisfaction of the attendees. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the proposal on November 18, 2014. The Committee accepted the proposal and recommended approval. The Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the Resolutions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645. D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) reviewed the proposal on November 18, 2014 (Exhibit J). Prior to the meeting, the applicant, in response to the Comments Report prepared by staff, revised his proposal and brought the revised plans to the meeting. The revisions included, for example, adding more stone veneer to the rear elevations of each architectural theme to match the quantity of stone veneer applied to the front elevations; adding shutters, pot shelves, or other similar trim details to all elevations of each architectural theme; and revising the roof types for consistency with the theme of each house..-The Committee accepted the proposal as revised and recommended approval. The Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the Resolutions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645. E. Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581: The proposed project includes the removal of nine (9) trees that are located along the north side of the project site. The applicant submitted a Tree Inventory Arborist Report, prepared by Ryan Wagner on May 13, 2014, that included the description and health of the individual trees and their overall health and condition. The survey identified only one (1) of these trees as "heritage" trees Which are subject to the City's tree preservation requirements as described in Section 17.80.050 of the Development Code. As it is necessary to remove the trees in order to grade the site and construct future single-family residences and associated improvements that will allow economic enjoyment of the property, the applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit. The proposed project will be required to include the planting of a new tree to replace the heritage tree that is removed. This replacement tree will Item I-K 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645,AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00581 —MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 4 be in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. F. Environmental Assessment: Per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the project qualifies for Categorical Exemption 15332— In-Fill Development Projects —because the project site is less than 5 acres in size (the maximum area allowed to qualify for this exemption). However, in order to qualify for this exemption, it must also be shown that °approval of the project would not result in.any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality." The applicant provided technical analyses that showed there were significant effects relating to noise and air quality. Thus, pursuant to CEQA and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to, for example, air quality (including greenhouse gases), biological resources, hydrology/water quality, and noise there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev .Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to the public hearing notices that were posted in the newspaper, mailed, and/or posted on-site. Respectfully submitted, Candyce Burn Planning Director CB:MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 -- - Exhibit D - Site Plan­_.. Exhibit E - Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan Exhibit F - Floor and Roof Plans Exhibit G - Elevations Exhibit H - Landscape/Wall Plans Exhibit I - Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheet Exhibit J - Design Review Committee Comments dated November 18, 2014 Exhibit K - Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Exhibit L - Initial Study Parts I, II, and III Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2014-00645 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581 Item I-K 4 JLI - ii=_. rf _ :YVILS,QNA�J�uwwci' . 'IRxMELELMJ i '/_d1D�L per__ it�'�__c�LLP�➢,YC�LI �l._J,nEAAB .�j� Ira1 =�_. .I ROCKING MORSE0. 40.1yyNrIfI23RD ST _ f71�1'ANOA CRFFJ(PARI•Cj I iHORSESHOE Cr P P�'I JO N II G i__-PMR@LN_ LOS.OSOS nROOIgEEN LT a, TLrDESBIIE➢9ml N 51pIPLE LAWN CT II �r- SUMMIT to c D 6BETJIICRN'OERBYCI L I ._ Y j•,I Station A='iTaoO TraxO Prom Tsi➢O IIM ..'• �I �L@BNY11d�TI----- _ I !NI'ERM TE /�. rzsoo e n� dim •�/ n"—"G'n: I L�.;'Y�6L..i u,¢Jr �c rz rAYFRL,rD@LLEPA��'i rL¢�Y�fI/M9 I_ I d I ,ssxo M➢f ! /J..{� NSLY7 •�NR@lc� .M9W➢R�i' ] d5 ` J/ :I G I r:I ,`'.V I tly�IiifynPro� � 147J II '�a �CpFpf �' e:L SvLMRN.NmxS�',:` I � ! y tM.�Jmn1-+on^-w- i mFiam' L'I•---y AGE jr--•-'� Ig WIIIgSfR3�I 9LlIE ;:GUM I +�\t•�� G i !i l i yG iP 14�` - djl_-��� ;$'�DA.__ '• !� !_.CASSII ISI pq}I '21L"iLxl'\ �h d`._ g NI zz z < qI 6 C•i ,g WIIBMI CT I!IO- Sc' 'F+.ir� �.�,ta.,ra -0 ',!lct JI i:a' sECA_Runrmis .N`G'= ,ffi 'BA9GCINST91Bp cx_�ONE�AO_-_ •x'Y- "�i,l V j fl 3 I: I Cl-- RNn° ) \Ji.� i;'i 6' x e� •4 gW�a /moi "�s-`a P-�" Sa¢ I� I ck P SAW . i,Ps'C�' .r-.�. —F*RLR +flRnP►I I+mER i G,PGGEO RR YROIkIM =.RNRP�`+� HIGHLAND AVE i c ,�— -- L_—__R-----1__.___::__ ,4 „ .YyE,LIFRR c _ N I �°7c ! II II 1 !% ++ap9MF1' \�'Exwe'IRf�AVyr'I.__—.__. CIR OR I _N7_➢_rE510NE➢IL.—. .;9BOMLFI 4'.lasu+p 11' sL. °D :..::...J... ;YRYOJe: __I Iell ylf`�y PLAIN POSE PL���MUNGOCr! �I'`�'R RRNSfDNF_nPi- j ' Lu '�Z.411.1 ^ _ [r II3 a ...I' s 1 (ARNESI _a a ar°"my°` I I z P I F Ear/ I• r v IRAN'. I E .. I .. .. i Z_:( o�' ] I�� PROJECT SITE " :ate, z � ;, lI q a Q LOS CEOROSSUi dal( ETYWANDA -�. ,1�A�E�.y, Lp' /y !.• 5 1Lu 1 PIMENURSr�pjlp f.. LMRERA ST li - . CTORIA ST weu¢'l�51 CE. mfr .• L, 1 a-2, I .�7s cam+, II�1i � _rl Imo- _. _ d ETiWANDAIr' `= ri e''X11 �• x _L9,," ��c R+n.gl8c�. -jam r1 II dII�V¢,T '3 lYY IE;El GLIi V awLT+s➢ A000,�R FE ; �?� f3✓'dP II j� I. ' ., P ° g*, \�r t \ g?Lm.es r_ I •p�NALH>T x:' �rxe `i, jyN-- c i '" L-g: { 1 1 p B sJGNI_i!aV L ,Ja_ + c5 ., J 11 i I I c �` SbOflllp�. 3. I` � "--�1 ��ll'Ji • I � P, ► 1, ai! G" i t `i �i I .° R - E T I W A N D Ail ! BYGGB� a LlOAFVir BnNI➢R-- I I�._�� =IA,QIYJPL -'=`•._: ) li Y!; -may; fI i;MuaRi't Ia_.xeIGJ.M '� Y 'C ( OG� : F:++-:•::�:_ e. ,. n, sxa I .i on 9 PACWTMLG CIL L„ Ylkxl01Y1R,'FORr .. y� IT',,I{If^ o _SWEWR�]61QIRADSVI GR G M,:. }� 9'r rRRPn�. ,..]:R..5: p.: cry' ,. i' 'P,c a GG ;i u L" ."'nS1:•. `� .2 Z.j.. ...Cn _ �1 G .J, IPWiFAU OR R pr cy, L� [ 4 2BJIEXEll M. IL�lEt�l II E:1 �.11' 'yP"L d '�fiiJ'2!i 1& ,I_ �fk oR_:u '� -i; i I ', �GRAPELAND I' S I..1��, "'°¢- BL➢ECOP L7 I y. s K qMilli L '' ssru+Tuurcr . dl S:! ',� �`�P+. ._._-... ilYllOR 65XOO➢NGSgp r ? _ bN Fire �;i I , °1 anlcGR ' WY ...,• I I a �'dl N_" S/anon 3 I I.• I, r L�.,.= I �: D.Tncx L E T1]➢O EE !;� I vndnxpcsrrl mN RARE.114E BLVD ' SII I ` °s Na y HISTORIC 7�M�PrLPm pr WINE MUSE�UMI&�,_P! Ice I d Lm,xuBE BR pILEY CT 1 ll➢RMPIlW_.SI I SSCMIYLERCT ?`'�II R 71t9Rrli�.�--�• .--il. vcis T C: �` r l PTARINGURI PI IINNGAIWL& �I ,��rp�PwT• { gI,MGSR'C Va .. - R._— li I�!➢A 1"'Dua pLR !RIHNTRGFCi gg , �➢Y' OIMI�iI y)A( �' +� Q e < ( 'RR�6�I I I9OURBU IY PL BPI II YS \g ��. € / I 'NEWS suxxcr c. a�JMXGBawEGr t R\II mx.nR? TERRA ��� I h lro i„E�vEaGurmpp jl_n_me�.lse� dI II o _-,G■M �// I, r + - V13TA_ PAJIB,^ I JIPIIE.AY BRNLrEN'SP.0 IXIIX Re Rx'"�, ui ;I NIj - G� __I�'Iw "�I,�•'�I �,I iIL I amcR�,a nx€ ( dW9EB m p l r (a' I I II II t xRR �! 3 gI ,a "KrBaoa I[ sPnmruGu RlxL !napRELGRA it S,• YOtSPPSA!BL II 2P'-.,{� AryELrtoM_{_,I?A�)J `� % ? ' �s.., ,,: .II• pr 1„ f^zg.,.1I aDsr 1 ipy�a__ I op-- I'�'�-a. S i I .siiv�GSE s!d fl S !i 2CXE5'IRIIONW 9 �' Lun 1 I' SII 1I i '••'!'$Ii.G .`AJK Ix , j :._.- RRESMIA OR II ll"- I IIE s % ir- CH—URCHST ,LRIrurEXwr _ � I �:�•E-� iLpnE_YPS{kYDHJj� !, 5MOL1A AYa➢ �\9 !l LVLMMCBMOR a< I `. X8 13 l+ ,• VICTORIA GARDENS 4 d ���" lI ^� .. KIM ��; . I y� f I( Q cmrtxx�uxsr I 5 snYNE9 �}R `� Ili :ANYON •Y.M.C.A. 4,2`� INa@vnx_S+! ! `I sourxMRmsr� LM -W�Esy4+G-,S �VutiEf�ETUOI (��. r; d /J� B _ ' gl�y"c'�610V6EBR I FONT �� I --� Il YEpsauEB 5i / GNFRVIL ST _. I I� sH ,ROCGXGNN,tt ) I �111 � i I ~ RANCHO '(z 3PPOTO P�PECf I it —11 ' WORIAA EII ©SANANTO O 4YORRTOWNCl I✓.$I$!GNmYR�n d MEDICAL SGORRBpBOR0. I I CENTER I IL /' g HISTORIC J' I 66 L/ FOOTHILL BLVD { i voorrnti _nxE3r: �CNESTRUTAVE /� I �,SERASTIRH WRY,J : r-- 1'n CAJLlEN111M LT FOCTNILL NiRIEEYPLACE 1 LW RVE j i owt 1,800 •:i,gETSR I 1]900 � Izea➢ 8 r �sl ARROW ROUTE � I VMITMAVE__l _.- -----�1 I r EXHIBIT A r i Item I-K 5 i e r r •� ` �• � m. a.Y .�..��.e.�� .•....$up�1?:PSl14GS 1'1 r , i$ • • 1 yt r yr _ f 1 IMI. I F � ♦ • PPF _:r -77 _ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 18966 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAa _ °� W etlar�tl a SEPTEMBER 2014 w61w`�n�r — �!K lrJrr w wr ErDAR N eMpYm — fIISri OOIDC Sfr&w I" —_ BASE1INf RD. ._... .............._.................... ..... _.._.. I leavro ace fA I I �s�mileiA � a r I K. AwEi I N/. SDYRr I[R q -VMNUr MAP - - - - -�aB,aR / .. 4me0i1'' aemrauenrw wfrw reia lar unpriRnsx cOrB�AI Kmr�EKVF/LxGa yWiEwRre x� `I srerwr "°wrxi;[uiR r .. ..... _ �'- clRl�mz'u oz1 •, •''B LOT, A z+Or sf: . mlr. +.:-,I`;., - O AR rAn a- -r3s `r` �� i °'r I._-1. I j' NfBER em for rw•E�Acr mYr4Kr r:e:n � tl ��w 00 r1'W,i' !1i 3010 rgx14r IR r a tanIR3AG[NGv[M.l aomar A- m- a dw ! O[ C[WIRr IR 1 om (61 CS-e3<O —Ir IR ! fe'1 Vl-f3m d I I I---- I r I s s. eL.iiaa 1[n a.w ewwwl ! AS SWRS PARCEL NO, I j ., � :��' � i ! us nni'nil.w lcii Is.ea awrcr rvnnr 1 AM ®e r n.aals 1,Iss lsan raxr4r ra[rp+ s uin DW m o 8 \ � ' I i� I I I` " e 4[° sal.rw.c• asx slex a,suol � I 0 - I mrK r,fn 11OJ AIN.: 11.090 SF. I I cRDa.............._..............I.A[Rrs Ni I I I 0 I fACLLLl1IR' A-1 OlA% ;>Jrii vKltbl.........................O.N KR[5 iLIILiWIIILLii .I. 6 I I I 5 I 11 AN rAsaawr ra wrn PRS xD anaea nava rnelRrRn coRur!.w.A Rml xmmEa x rroa o TLWOIxlAPNY SOURCE RU/LD/NC SEIBAp(S E9 I \ I I I II,BI�SF. I �': � w em�mµa wrigrKr w([m nmr�'AnRU 1O3 3w uwiRvrr A I RnrRimr,a c a sorer[r�xtl��Al ........................ .............» xprc.(a1,n,-ilei ------ 'P `: b i errc'�nrra;n uu a xsixxrxr r[a.xn-0aiw i'°i rirRarsAe m fe•roiW (6r1 v,-ai! °P PLAN r► t :: � (---_- � pifieC rose In-Id[van erLCENMI IO V P v 1irNE.• 4:'M]CwE 1, � M II PRCIOifD LAND e5[:Sin!'lF iMOLI R[l:wMIW i I i I r,hl� RAnr ivnw rRwos[o emeeu n,W % L• I p m !`:10.111SF. I69763 SF I i 'I g „ ���ai ., u , .'; �ynu PURVFrae[s .—:7 QtNCr1.i VALLEY xIrF4 p5IRKI J I I BASELINE ROAD --_--.......eam[RR u ens Int - armrD nAAx aalo I rncmw................__..........._.........iaRr war.NisIR wsrRrr Jlr1rLY_•� �.. 1r WM � �I . r6r............. OYIa r09Vl�1Ow SUBDiNSIAN INFORMA710N s .` RM LM1 r,Acr e A a rr se-Dnean a!r[r.R..a r i I I • r I ! I� aoTr I} w°rti owie[r'Om•s liwrr.�"ai°vSTr�i[rcrrt'D[a;ui Da 1 ...... `. d NIIl Cnm I LDTTDr n K PAVDG �Nps WpgfDµ0 W O M SaM.i4 Yii wl axR[r TOTM rrR raR. �� ,J�1 Dmm�reimro.en w..o e:ner n.re i lgns Sr. 19 979s sF i I s.; n,. --__- $ wm ... \, "Fl ,:.TFT+.;ti�`v� i*a r rein r cenD e.axRer.e m nr Dmtw r wrn \ I . 1 I .mist wrn a iw w wcw�Der:a.Rrwu[” I I I I sNE11X PLACE xwlrx. ,aWr;A , talKra eTR(Er, . reaDw Rm K, El1m4[.alr]75Yi IR.AUL !s ww'Nmm Paer. unT. are rswl[o rwc.wl r raxRnry re r"urn wnrre ioirr na sa m salt.r.v Rel Rn.[r er moos m we rrR wlwsrD , RrN rRlcr morn naw LrrtwoRlr Lm rum L IOP.M -------J i' 30 WH 3[I V.Ylii7.119,3[il5wrmr�imv.nrmxWMiY !, ! r iwLP.-- in r Al M s11.rNs 1-1 a li r r A' r t e r m°erwo`'^^rti•""tl snraki srt�wi aanr naa wa r— era�rm e�ruwrm o.on rasa ne euRo nt iD[l feum eb b r I I 1 ----.-- —� r er wet. IRW ifV. MO nI 110t[RartY-wr aaRRn wr 1 8 r!AI 1.111. K RMI. ea r �YAGfaII m'\ I I [IQO ��O I ' i} wnT. N rImMuctomen roxnAu uRe Ano Lynn.sasWc 9 \l1; I 110TDn!nO Wa4ni 4a6 InRrr wr i(Rf 4Rfi0L aMI 616 Sr. 9, I Ig nnrerie arrnir�""wY.. rm�il vi'airres'°nrerw�l,iw� I I 1 I I ' I 777E I �_-.*`='=r -- n°lnnN Atl w,w rxA mumiaxw. a � '� � I I I °� �- nntwR;,[,n! . •• .. Priv mr :i.�ura,/esre[D/n Rn star Al ! ' EMMETT WAY L--------------1 II I II "u`wc;`r`.`c nm D R mre CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r I Ea1r Ix I I =z/ I' I \' i ® TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 18966 APN 1100-011-57-OoW I APB.• 1100-011-58-0066 IAWJ: I/00-011-59-WW Ra 4 nrrr [wTr ®a " 1!1l:Apls5Ul4!BG:FigG!fi IT..LN� w o m Ie • e asswam su.0 . or 1 surErs "'$a Is.w m x SITE PLAN TTM 18966 W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 2014 BASELINE RD. w"�•rx�F —_��•...__' .�_._..--�K�4'.UY—...._-i_. _�.�__ _ Gene[WIn LK _ ...fib,..... WaNITY MA I • ————— GBIrL enlLLc YrBrR tK � I iRtStED IW[T MIYIRr � a r' Y ' I mamm rRRfRR 1fr F4 ft AIi re—--V IX9r,Wfe Das[ 1 I smlu w OINVEr £YELOPER. .................... .... -- ..._..._. ._._._._.._..._..._...._.....__a^BR_�..._.:.:. I O SUM A ..`.f..... msr r.Y � Grsr.sii LLc L `) / ... ...... RY Grsr..RM... !17 MN E !�� .' LOT A" G:...:� !INmr V I An" IASSfSS014S PARL NO. N• 1 i o _ BP «Be_..... KRre BU/LD/NC SEIBALYCS c —e, ...__—_.._.___.."' IrT....._.._..............._..I.RI KR[e f I5 i I �$ I eK___r xa e•re rm TOPOGRAPHY SOURCE w raattrer rxe.reRs o I 35uzIIM4An An- - — .1 I C4 nR fr45r[R Linz n�Tiwu MIl ss siw _ as w-a!e.m rv.LwV cs-ssa+ I_-- _ m d [D I .:' �.. oo � rarsl.r �Ln-lnI rEL"/f aSlL01lW p � r r eatsr raeffx FrtlrRc LRlD Bsr:vKNn I4(p S anrRa raKRK IRI%:YRBC wuL-Af Wq Q I j k I ✓1 — I 'Yl1 PRWE[O IWL:St1:f(rtl oWaU 3I C 3r I ne Z I I I I ll. r.maeo IIeD IRSfl s.Ir sNYE ranlr RlsuxlW Sj llfRlr x41 I1R Clffe r 41rrlR K PIK:G IRgm[r S()RRK ANf S"a(ID OYK[/ BR�.`-I{(,� yl I sL f•I I c I I N. I o `Y•; r -,Y, ?.`try5,.-.�4«.t�F T~~x P-mRT.rnorT[Lw.v4 mxTr�i asav er4wewat sr.R �I I " e o a curdlM.�ns PER mu,,[ my x ecu![w 6 Tyl = BASELINE R P/RCI I I R9f�NY Lr B.c a wn. I4 I a -` Iv I w�ia....cwKrrrrCv.LLn srre asrrncr i .............. ....e0IrM4x------ r :or —— - ... � ! Fm r" int..-�.-..-.._�_.......'.- .KRanI ---�I�Y� �'.•.; �-——— J � 1� 4 I tors srNL:t......u.rwr4ie.vKLr:x.rfa Gsr4KT 1 / I P Ma' � •'•f.)[e a• F CeYF...................C4ARI[R CpYSRXATW i ff 1 MI TABLE eroI I ! Y ! 19R. _ n4f rorK ecRl.[LOx .. _......... I N• I L I 7 i ........... =a=,. rf I I I.aI' I I I' SHELBY PLACE ! ! I w1[crLx mar, L' I I rwran R/Li w � I I I F sruG r.Lr sa p o .:ar ro � v I iq r r �/ — —1 •' r a a r r v vLrtrRxl �. o v :i a r Ir I O I � I �sni nluBfrT: Kms. �. sRf h • T r r I 4 PMP.IX C7 : [Mr. MM1L I F EMMETT WAY... ."°°mTea•`texr I -1.1 a m CITY ITE PLAN TTM 189 6 r IXIlr.P,A x" k IX61 M O - _ IXrs f xn n[ _ 0 3 ooao 66 at oraPR ll- - rr RRx ' APM 110(1-011-57 .. IR 39 '�: `:': IXnr.r lw f 1 •` •APN: -OQ70 mlr.f• �` �� �L>�11a I. � i�°�T� LmtNaoab APN: it 1 .i�C.: i T Qo .. 1 or r eters ro WWI .x ev. � 3' f CONCEPTUAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUGUST 2014 BAMINE RDL is ........................... r7 I HUNIff AMP ................... ci 2 R i — —"7.— ---—.A.."—T,7 .......wl. ... ...... .. ...... —4 LAI ............ Im A., .......... LOT-A- mo sr w 7S 91 6",?T PA R Q N a 'A' r ar v UNUZY Afflif W"-1 —)AAS", CONS1RUMN NO IN -A.— flit, SEC1101 T-r m F-17........... ........... ... ... . I- 6: 4 01 M.S sr A % WX 9 V 7 IA J 7 so I ON: .... 17w Al— oil SECRay Ir Q9 t. sifts it. I A LOr SUMA rARY J. q a,.\ Co aim (D— jk- ­4 A. A asg I K UAW WE- END9NiIU I OA— A 11 W. w vv -,mm.-F za�w1c. A� qm IA19 KW& Al THPOW qrflES %R -------I SECRON A, SETBAMS CITY OF RANCU-6�0UCAMONGA CONCEP'MAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN A TTm 18966 ShELBY PLA ww BA ROAD 'A!-"A i d 0 O� 0 7/G.GLGiULf o GUlUUlUU!!/L'1UJ' _ RED_PA . .... .... - l6 } IL + DI F- ' KIT_ ENTRYW12 9 �� �.... .. i DC' `mow QURTY ARDS• :rL / .•� J/ , AREA CAL"LATION5 I� w ar &ARA&E - FIRST FLOOR FLAN AMCMPAAMYHOMBB PLAN1 a. -0 13025 easel m mood. ,e>•FLOOR PLAN RANCHO CUCAMON CA 91789 A BUNGALOW MPR MMUr f NMI tA7—Pl.1 117E PDN-1/-11 MARC HOM)�8 Li.0M DAMELLAN ASSOCIATES tDtl wt�OAtA {I11Q ttt 60fg O TS PARR t1A71L7tD CA ummVpB,G t,M tttmm �'Pt4�7t'fAN �yWR�,.� I I ____-�_ ---------- - ; 1 I I I 1 --r, ;_____ _________ L.i 1 ------l___________________J I I i 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I � 1 1 I , 1 1 � 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I � I I 1 I � I - ; I � I •RI T � 1 ' 1 1 1 I 1 1 --------------- -------------- ------------ - ��- 1 ' 1 ; 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1. ,1 1 ; , 1 1 , 1 , ' 1 , w , Jw r \ -4 MGLZ BAMQ.YHOBM PIAN 1 OHMR lam Oman"load, ROOFMMpyr t-PL2 RANCH4000AMONZ CA 6178 Aiffspl►MMAM@ UNIaA7f=90M-tt-11 - IWAS _uttaaRa r r� DAND;L AT&4 M' LAWNU�M ROOF PIAN - �tW®SOS!• PmQ� f�OyCQO�YlOaA7S PARK raor nru.Lr Fu unn. G un I_ ltlIMi1A HOsYYO�� ❑® 0� 03 o d� I......r... D vi 10 3 j ® RIM _CI . 'T'-0 AREA GALGULATION5 1- AR i FY ]Y u y �- FIR5T FLOOR PLAN BaNGL$FAMO.YHOMBB PI.AN1 ' 5c 0 1so� �4Ifff r A-PIA RANCHO CUCAMON CA 0789 1..... FRENCH DAFAOMW@ UNI DIIMAI N-11-11 =MARCjWjff&"&_FpDANFELUN ASSOCIATES COBM9A78 PARI(t MlWMYU �wrli� i •------------ ------------, 1 - __________________KP________________rc j ; 1 1 , I � 1 , 1 ' 1 , 1 I 1 1 I 1-------------- ' 1 � ' 1 I 1' 1 - . 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 , 1 , 1 1 � 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 � � I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 ; w 1 1 1 Et ' I , 1 ; 1 1 , � f , 1 1 1 I I' 1 .- 1 1 1 • 1 ; � 1 MLLE 1AM Y RONMS PLAN 1 180x6 Bwmbw Road. sFAM PL N A-pi.g RANCHO OUCAMONOk CA 01730 DAPFAMMS MI oA7esoN-11-N ROOF FLAN MARC HOMBB LLC VPDANIELUNASSOCUTESfOC"FMA78VAM W MVINLCA In" laNOlA>i fW7AiW h' COVERED PATIO Fl v Room �® ROOM no ® 6REAT ROOM i • KIT �� ENTRY '-------Tz ij1-CAR Amy:rut? `yF AREA CALCULATION5 8'N1CMC MV FIRST FLOOR FLAN 9II�(d.E FAR!ltII.Y MKMM PLAN Z �pr 1 . SCALES 1/4°•I'-0° 1.9QM RWA 16T FLOOR PLAN 11LOW l�«l-�i•1 wWCHO CUCAMON CA 91780 AM__�.� QAp10�•T•MM1 OI am"-11-H MARC HOMBB LLCMMMM=CA IMM al DANI�IdAN ABHOQATBB frifAw �wr� .. -------------- KR � ® a HOF - rWLAI.K-IN �O h--------------- cylFAi ---------------- ---------------------- i i 1 , � r' I SMGLZ SAMMLY BONMS PLAN 3 Pam � t X004 18026 BtueYrw Roo4yam.° A .Z WWCMOCUCMCMfWCAOlM o�rao�mcr tett a►remow-n-tt ae�tnn TrnunlA Id.0 DAN UArs+J ASSOCIATES �u�vtRwramro mttt�!�A tMUS wcompo"TRIPAM NMUS C=CMA'=.ftddb. i r---------------------------- --r-`--- 1 , I 1 , I I 1 I , I 1 1 1 I ------------------- 77 1' ' � I I 1 1 I 1 1 � 1 1 1 , M -u 1 E 3 I 1 1 1 1 I I � 1 r______________ ----!_� ----------------_; , 1 1 I I •v i I I ROOF PLAN 81NQ.8 FAMH Y KOhM PLAN 3 �r iam eneNW RO4 - FAWPLM,,,,u A-P23 RANCHO CUCAMON CA 178® MARC HOMBB LLC RM LIAN ASSOCIATES vae+n.Vmw tmt EMKOuc♦V16 9MU3 "CORFCMAUFA a MM1t>®WCumm"'V ntL �'�VOR.cA sna Asa w��� s�MFitM �rat�� t z r,rMLIMMa a�rUam� o arm i0DINING GO ;E PATIO ROOM rrnF(DI ' ...;.. I ® GREAT LSCi1W.If:rJ - 1 . IRRA.� Z-GAR it- V- O x.,.1••1 q AREA GALGULATIONS IUL— � •rry i FIRST FLOOR pLaN BII GLZFAMMYBGNM YLAN2 BMG1: SGALEI I/a'.I-0• 18025 B=@V M RM4 18r FL001iPLIW RANCHO CUCAMo CA p17s8 W OMB W FRBICH A-OZ.S - - - I DAPRDAW#WMJ 011 MII-11.11 PARC Wma LLC DAUSOCJ MWGA c• ZMI. wca�ra�Aae� wY°�DwEas. CL wt>. �� 1 MCA .w°t..�.l�.r. rr, ----------------------- I __________J _ y...t ' IN _,- ' •� � L�44 r-Y Dr � ' 0 i i i i r i ir____-____ MGLLE FAMILY HONSS PLAN 3 avail SEGOND FLOOR PLAN 130 ®WWWM P" V4D FLOOR PIAN A P2.6 5G , ■ -0 TfOONNFRI FFMM RANCHO CJ1M0 CA 91780 M% No W011 OATMWM-11-11 Aa�nn�rn>►�g LLC DANEKLIAN ASSOCIATES �i�.71IRF'.+PiAFQ0T10 �t1FlB�OrFi�Y�Ff01FE/PL W(!OYMYA74 PAM YPANL,LFJ 1y77P �'�VO/R4f\A �L11�s I I i --------------------- ___________________ Ti----_ _____-FFi I 1 1 • wu � I I 1 _ I 1 , -------------------- 1 I 1 , I 1 7 1 , 1 I I 1 � 1 _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 , I 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 II - 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I y o i 1 I ROOF PLAN ' wor nru w.e.0:xo. BHiGLBFAMILY HOMBS PLANT r 18Q26 BY�eIYN Roaq, !RCQFPIM CA pt78p ® A PisVQOUKWF •7 RANCHO CUCAM — — — �a►wto�are t a��ow-tt-tt DANEELIA TES RAN=' CAXW4M ;mmEd� �4�a am vw,wll h s -.yq COVERED PATIO 9 I UU FfM� I 0 ,R w lu O MORwN� Qi' N _ ROOM ENTRY rn r6A . . i 2-CAR7 hl e ENTRY PORCH G N.. -------------------- o q &ARA 6 AREA CALCULATIONS i ' 9lUl AVD v_wV FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE. 1/4'-I'-O' :CHO:ICU GLEAM yHOMESPLM3?6 * ood. ���,W t� .i N CA 97739 MARC HOMES.LLC DAN<ELIAN ASSOCIATES �Yl.'WfYCfl1YC a PIAFMMO tYiW®lS QA<♦ WEIR U1 60CORKMATE PAWL YlIL� CJ fhAP �'OTVMR,CA 93M wwwlmddb� ma v��n�ana��.a►aapna ummoper— KO "m WSMIM mrvaa�vaoaaooe� mama vs�oame►aw , dos"NVII12UNVU ►-� -naa �ioM i�onuw – – – - AMYWDWm.V. auto Va N nvon*OFY mm ru Y wM HOob o>,a 'P�l1 mINm9 9L0t1 o-n ea �vos :tea c NY7d g81�OH 1['1®iYA 8'PJN18 r�aoo7d arrows , I ----------- ----- i i i I � , , -------I---- i I 0. Y molm r. y 01 N2.10 �Ou�A aae w .- I o ; Y I I I i ----------------------------- -T-,-------- 1 I 1 1 : I � I 1 h 4;17 1 i I : � 1 RIJSC hT. 1 4,12 1 1 1 ----------------------------- - I I I 1 I 1 r 1 ` ✓ __________ ____-_-- ; 1 1 ; i 1 I 1 I 1 � I I I I 1 5:17 .•• kz�: 1 1 I1 1 ROOF PLAN BUYGLB FA:pto" Y HONM PLAN 3 � "'°•�� .••°.� tsoxa e.FAwROOF�R A-P3.3 CUCN CA 91780 A suNCALaw ----- DAPRO1CCr/"011 DATMgU-1/-11 MARC HOMFS LLCFall DANEELIAN ASSOCIATES ARLIFIEGTURZ+nAMM �71Y�Ori1 /OfR� fOMY10YAlY PARK 9AA0� GriTimVQmc nmm frA7FA!➢ 10 COQM e�s1�Yi�o o 07ZEU20MMA aG { i GOVEREG PATIO ®rrflE . ® I 0 MORHIN6 ' . •„ ,d CREAT O le ENTRY PORCH EvW LY ----------- �_ id CAD AREA CALCULATIONS 9fAH;AaD P_AY FIRST FLOOR PLAN 9GALE� NO SINGLU FAMQ.T ROHM PLAN 3 a 1802E BOEHM ROA 18r FLOOR s alN A PAS RANCHO CUCAMON CA 91739 DAPROMWIP NMI oAlu2PN-11-11 MAKEK MBBLLC E.DANIELUN . � 22g21AtlNlI0WL>li�AD Y O�wC♦w�NCIAR PI1AI7�2lP �'ABC8�7U2i A S8I ATES 000RPORATE PAM am. eav�sli�e� v. . 1------------------------------------ . a EW 2 O r�� ..r -ifRflN6i� law � em y � YitiLK�N � a p = -- - OPEN TO Jilli + I 1 ® 9ED I I V� I I IIIIeII.'{-�-...{1''V'///Y li-�'.1II'''�-s• I 6�I ----------------------J I I :=r1 - I I ON6-FL R PLAN SM"RAMQ.YHOPM PLAN 3 rte' 0 18026 Smal �Re" Wim,FRIUCH A—P3.6 RANCHO CUCMONGA,CA 01789 AlNt—•--- D%WAA0f/MMI =GAM2M.11-11 MARC HOMBB.LLC �DANI6LIAN ASSOCIATES ins+� mw>mso�s• tfumm Woaora�aPAM p7ffl �' wivYY�� • I I • I aevaawawewor m>ome ♦moa®ee►sa ormoirH.aawa�ev�� VL708SV NVI77I VQ IS-R."Wawa WN ouraoeava I — — I wxr3aa AHUA=.a este vy N6vmrtJ ONJNva usm a 1ma 88f11Ou rnwA rm m Nvid dopa 1 � , 1 i 1 , 1 1 I 1 1 .i ____ . _ 1 i 1 1 r1 ' 1 p 1 1 I ( I 1 ' , I 1 i --------------------- - Cut, T 1 I /_____________________________ LoM 1. 1 1 - L4 asoa i i • i I _________________ � 1 1 1 LI'S 1 1 i ' 1 , 1 i _-.1211111111.Iiiilil11/111111111111111/11111►Fa,_- illiinnnu.� 11/11111/VIII/111111111111111UIIlu`.��x',7111���--����.....�.�•�! �1111/IIInrJ�llllln'-�'!lu.a� i11lllln1111/11111/11111/1111111111111111I111111r111$� _11■III/I�IIIIIr111111111111 T■III(I/Illnrlllll� �n11i:� �ill�lllll/11111111 11/11111/11111/11111/11111rfllll/11111/11111/11111/I/�F/III(IrUl11rIIIlI/11101 - �ill�lllll/11111/IIID`%����!init�.�- IIf-l1III/11111/11111-1-111rlllllSlllll/11111/11111/I�IIIWIIIW1111IIIIIWIIIrUIIIWIIIWIIIWIII/Illllri.�!'•1rI111in1t11�111_____�_____ ____ ,�,��II�Ir11111r1111111111U1❑ ■141111 IIIII/111!111:Iln/Ur,:.;.;... . Illlr11111/IIIIm1111n1111WllllolllrlllllWlllrlllllrlllll/IIIII/IIIIWIIIWIIIIWIII/Intl/IllllrlllllWIII�IIIII�IIIIINIII/Illli�lllll u111�G %- �• _-' !1111 Illn/IIIII/11111/11111r1nr�y.�- •. 1111111/Illllnllllnllll■IIIIIW111111.....I1111IIIII/IIIII/111111111111III111IIIII/IIIIUU111111111/IIIIIn1111/11111/111111IIIIIWplripnripjlrlp011' ■Imlmuullnnunu = �p I... ulrnnlp...-— ^q/IIIII/IIIIir�3�l11rI111UiI1111■T:>. ..unuw nun.wnn■u.rluurl....u.nrinurwnnnurunwuu.uni•u.uru.un..n.lnnru.n.u.n.umnuuriuu uillllllrlllnrl1111E111!!RI -_��A•�_---� -".71111PI� "`--� �•rQllllllrll ln: •nn■IIIII■III■��... ru• li■nnl■iulu�u.[I\—� I�.nl■Iu1i■ul■ulu.�l' IIIII/IIIII/11111/111. lllln IIInrIllnrlll. __ _ � f�Ill i11iI1111iI11ftIII11-I11 II■IIIII/IIINIIIII■II m IIlli�il 161717111 �■ r. �� mii eon evn iiili � Ynue nor.'� Ilnnull liu II Im O III O I Ilrn�l�linil nl�1lll I������ �iin11T11„—iiil •...r.,.>_ _ll � In/I 1111111 nn I 11TI�T1T� n I1lmorl m =:T%91111 1/111114 11111111111 liiiiii =A'i _- -=;t111111 _11 �-�luinll��_g - __ �iilllnr1111/IIIIP.�_� -■1■1:.�� _ >:Iniumunnnnnnnnli`�.-, ,�i111rI11nrI11116�� =......lnminWlnWln/nllulnlml.:,�� 0n nuliiiinliiililiiiiiiini�T■n�•=iiilnun>Inlnrnln/nlnWlnWlnrnlnnnmla.� -9'nimlu nnnnnmiWT.�.� Inumuunnn4l!Im-:uliimmmnulrnmmmm�l/nnlrlulmnnrlunlnln■. ------------ -_-_: mlimmomrmnminminuumm�rnm/Iumnlmmnrlumnnl. e,Irulli�iliiu Inuilii-- A lu rmnrrun mnrmm umirllur•� �.:.�____--_-_,�nniiiil'riiiiliiiiil�ilul/uuunlnrnllunnlnunrnln/ulmnlmulmnlnnnmlunrnlmmnWul:.rmnln�llunnl .:.6nln/nln/nlmnlmllnlrml�nrinr Inrul�rm��=-=�o'--�,��� 111ue-r.mnultnnl/iu/��..mmnllmnn/Iulmnlmumulnnurmnlmnnnnmiuminnnnlrrinnnnmin Iruln■ulminnrlumin.,_�,nu�nlml .��mnlmnlnnnlmnmlumnlnnunrnln�ilnml�s - — Ir-_x111■IIIII■IIIII■Illy'x"fl1nl111r111111111/1111111/IIIIIIIn/1x11111111111n11nnIIIIn111IrUInr11111/IIIII/11111111111/11111/1�111nn1lnnrmnllrlun/nlm1., -- ilmlaminnnullrnlm11u1nn/nulnrn11Ir11111►/I i�� 1 Itl�Rul I- IIl�lllll I' 10 1111 '■I■I L.I I�L I�I '■I �' r ... '■ ■ '■ h—� t■ '■■I'■I 0 IIu1 MRO '11/IIIIIrIlU1:��� I In�Ulnrll 111x1)•:'.0 h ,911111/(IIIIxIIIn■I��•'�����'!71�i �il�llll11111nr111/!"�'. 111 `Ii11�111111UI1I/11111/11..1■I jlllllrlllll/Illlu IIIT�11 I■11111/11111/11111/11111/111111 11/11111/111111111111111 ■IIIII1111p rlllll/11111/11111111/IIInrI1111rU � 111111■11111111111r11i■111fill 1111iiiiV '1"" 111111'Iiiiiholl ■� �r _. - ■I■I Ilj j= I I III IIrH ,: II 1 �.I:: —10!MFS_ 0 ?�. IIIIIIIII]IInIlw� , inluumnlllln,nrnmin�, Giinmumnmm�nn.., .Al 11l MEIN)nrlu nm lmunlrnnmm�.:>__ .ai mnlnrmn/lunrnlndnuu, .Al riillummmnnunr;-.:.::�mm�td� . -.I111I111111n11nrn1111nlnrpinnl1r14I1111/111IIn1111 '�l�'711111�I1i �I�iu:•, ,.1111In1111111111IIU.rR::�.nnlIIIII nlnnna., -�:ninuunnumnlmnllrrnumlul/nnlllmm�111/nlmi�,_,--,IUI.ii!ndluuiw:., �iimnnl/n111/mme:.:.n1MnnMmm.�:mnnlu,. llunnlrIN)mnlmnImillirlu111111 umnnnnnmmmnl I I 1111111 IIIIIIIIIII/11111111111111111111111■f11M1n11I1fi:?�_ _ lillll1111mI1111111111411I11L„ iiiliiiiilinlnmmrulmilnnulumar 1 111 -__ TI 1111111 I I 11111111111111111p111111p M11N)M1nlIInn111ppInpllplpllppll1n111r1111i.onion..T+u..T..1:i.:In:7.7,G.-.�j11�I111I/IIIII�IIIII�IIII ,'�IIIn1111111111111111111111' \\r�1111111111�.:1111/)11111111.,E Mnnnnmmmlum 1 m AID IIIIIII nlmnnllnfrill mmmnnllnnllnlmnlnlmnuunemlum111nlmmmlumnlnrriili�Illl iiiiilnilliuii Illi I1111111111111r1rIp114n �,.1111141111141111141V' ��1111141111111M.��r(2']loll IIIlnlha� i�11u livill nuunnlrnulrunlrlN)llrum/II11uu1nuunuunnnluunlruu14u111r111r1E111I11I1111n1 n I ,.a:nnunnmN)llnllrs _ �Innnmu� c�mnnnnnn.�ammwnonll,_ ..nrm f■■ ■■ 11 1� -.�III� �l'c ,.III•\I-1_�4 11,11;_ e\ .111 Iii ii 'O .■ ■■ " 11 �.eun nen� Mur,nor. VAR i�� _ i� �,�i��, _,�i��i��l.`= =- — - — —— - 'I .i1�1111141N)loll l l Iia .iiiumlulummmni�.� .iunnnumnntrnu ri.:_, milli iumnulunnmumuulnu,,>, m un4nulrnuuunmumuua, Su'unnunnun4nunlN)mununul�,,� iinnnmm�ul/nlnnnmmmmnl�..� -:nuirTunis1•1�1�%,iiiiniiilli�iiiili i°mil�iilmn�iillniiilnniniiiiii�:. n"iln/mnrulnlnlnlnlnnulmnnnulmm., -i�llll!111111411111/IIIIi111111rI1111n1111111fill 11nn11M►-, of rill -- ------ iitilmmmmnrmnrmmnnl4mnnumlurrnulr:- ------=-=::�:mmnnmunmumMnru111rn1mnlmmnr°°1r°°1r°nlnun.�=�'�miiiiuunniiiiu nnunnnnm/nnlrmnemnunnunnuumnnlr;- ...uiiiil"riiiniiiiaiiiin�mnaunnunnnmumr1M114uln1nlmnut4'1'Mnmm�unnumnnnl�� ,,„i114111111uw �:mmnnumnnunmul/nnlrunnlunuunln;nr--' - _ --__ nnnnunnunnlulmmrnlnn11n4111nn11nn1ImII11n1Im41111uuuunnunumunnunnnnniw. ,..InN)u4uu .-:.nimnnnnnmun/nnnnumununnnnnuunr 'll�ll�ll�ll' �•i.11111/IIIn41111n111111/n111/plll/IN)I1nN)114nlnnN)llnOt1/IN)11111In4n1111111r1/1111�111rr1I1I141I1m1111141111111❑:��`,1o1111 .. .n.■.n. r.numunruum...� ulp<;%liinnmm�n_nn!,-,mmol milli 111111111 11 ullnui... _ — p L•..__ ____ _ — _ - I ■■ ■r uu u i un �m �■ ■■ ■■ ■i■ ■ ■■ : ����::� p :: :: ::I::I:■J :_::_ : : .. _ ;:nnnunuun,�nlnrnilriiil%., ,.fiinuunnumin.lg%•�mnnm�. ON ,111111411111/11111/IIIII�$%44111Mri�X11111111 flu, rig, iiiuuulnumnnuuul[.. nnlunnluun4nlnnunm ilinn lolllmuumnn4nulrmrn � annuunuunmlmrillsill ON p ■: No ---- E ■■ ■■ ° III s _ :11 :10b1(ti-_ _ 1::I:::: %,� -.� �_- m� Iniu`■iuiiiGlnnilnil`nils`Ii1i■Ylni■iliiilnil?In7inTiiiiili■`nilflo--i----- ��-------- iiiiuiiiniiliiummn �— ;.nnnnnnnn..r_-.,=:.:.:-..:_ uuulrinnmunnnrmmnnlrmm ,Ilmnlnnummmmmnlmmnnn�- - 1.; ■nilnnnl frlllllrllllnlllllnl�lln!'�>� IIIIr191Y1111rII111r11111rI1111rI11mlllnrl111 iminmimm�mrinmunlrin/'�` 1_ �glllrlllllrlllllrlumuullu•��- %1—���!m�l lanuarnninn:s- .1■I�Inrrnnlrluarnniuunrnllr�l mm�umnnnnmunm! ��_ ..mlmimm�nrm� I� 1'�' ��� ���_I' � 0 0L•J� �I�II�I�hI 11� 11 1011II� 6r IrnImI111111111irn111r1111IrI1111rlllllr0==;-.Illllrllmrlllll�lln, �_��1� ��,� .�=.,���ilnului�iRSuiTiililnun5�+�-+��'�6! - .—=- ;- nnumnumnnuumnllmmm�lmininnlunnrnmr1n11un ,-- � _,,-� 1-'����mm�unnnnnunnuu_��m.= Il�ummmnlmmm�umninnnmY[wl�nl■nn�rnnlrnnluh:ml �� - -- ����>,mn■mmmumlr�M-=�:a-=_- eor� m HIall iiifuil Gnniil7inilnniu`dioTli�i1B1 nulrmns�=��"�liiiliiiiniil�'nunlunu lanl■�-,,;�^!I�f:+euumruln■ulmm�nunwuu■unuunuulnrluurinaruuunm■luurumrwa 1lmmm�nmunnummmm=nlun•�-.. _••lnmmmnnnnm A>/��aunuurlunruunummnuununuuumrumrumruulrinunuluulnrluurw I�. 1��1■.IWI _ 111.61 � =I■I■h I■■I.■I ■II■■ ■ ■ Hill _ 'nuurunlrunuumwuuuuunnuunlrnn �,,,, _ m , , runuuuwuunuumlllrnlllrulllriuu114nurunlruulruuuunuun —� ��'lI�I1111rI1111rI1111rI1111rI1111rI1111W111 Illllll.umauu■um.uui.nw■In _ _ ___ -= f.l — _ �dna- = = ��I■I■� _ _-�LI� _I.I 111111.11111■11111■11111■I------------- III — --- ' �I mrloml illml mm�nmul m•.^-�mrmmm sc - ILI :1r r rl (1)",1:: - -. - snnr11u1r1n1I11111 m --------------- ���ilnun/nnunnunulnunulnuuuunm/mnmin/nnt•!nJw Will 11 -_--_- •:ulll/11111/IIIIDi.a�\t!_�; "IlilIIIIIIAIIIIIjllllljljilljllllljlll m IIII/11111/11111/IIIII/IIIII�IPS^-�'�II X11/IIII���^ !11�11111/III11!.�Ijllllm� Illlll�lllllrllllljlllll�l�ljdlll/11111/IIIII/IIIIIrllle- ��!.I/IIIII/IIIII/IIIII/IIIII/IIIII/IIL�.\IIIA/\�111n� ;I/pll�r 111/111/11111/11111/Illli!.111411111111111111111/II III IIIIII�� `I111111111111/11111/11111/11111/11111/1111111 _ aflllll/IIIII/IIIP9:�iUl■11111/11111/IIIII/IIIII/IIIII/IIIIIrIIi.:L�I1.:"�/11111/I11allIII 11111111/11111/17!111 •a1111nrI11111111IIrI1111rI1111111111r.• m �� I� ■t .� � Q �� ■�, ■■' 'AI uuim rrrrli IINI1111�111111 ■■�:�i�■ _�i�•JI/�••� ■� , ■• � I�' •�- „„I 11111/1111111IN II I I. -------- nr11I11a11.. .•i _____”___- _ II►►n���� rru• m numnmm�n,llll, o iniummnnuo`.�. ■r' � II/IIIII/IIIII/IIIII/Inn1� - lllll/11111111111/IIIII1h:. -.11111111111-IN �a= iniililiiil.,> 1111111111/IIIm11111/11111/IIDI.�===:.- _-S�IIIirilI111�I111I�1111 .iiiamnlmulnrnlmnln/n1n. IIIII/lllllrlllll/11111/IIIII/IIIII/nri'�1111I/IIIII/Ipll/IIIII/IIIII/III �iiomlunrlllnrlumnlmin,llo��� ,�_t! -•��n�llrnln/nllnlnn..a�1 :...-_..... ,. l _.rlunmmrmnrnlnrl...... aluli Umnnlrnlmnlnmlelel •ailliinlrlun/nnlrmminnnun/��� s--�-,=u.�,.:mm�nlrnlmnluou� - - T a inur.nan nIa17 nonME non nur. 1111 1 III b_ me m --����u11,14���1� �5�� ■■ ■■ wi No ME ,_rmilli nl/nnl■nnluuIll ummIll I InllnunuuWIN lun/unl/nnw:.� �dl/IIIn11111I111111111111I/Inm111111ol 11[mi 11/IIIII/IIIII/Illmlllll/full/III%�� _ :iiiiliiin11u1n1..----------------- iiinurmlu!nnrlumlumnlmmmlumnnl/mmnlmmn11um1un/lum.. 111111111/11111 11111/IIIIIrlpllrlllll/IIIII/IIIII/IIIII/IIIIIrIn11r111n11n11/Intl/IIIIIrlllllrl1111/11111/11 -�•1111I11I1 Coll Ill 1111111111 1111m 111 Ill ill II/IIIII/Illmlllm111111 11111/IIIII/II[Ill ln.?� uuuunuunuuulluunuuuuulruunuuuunlluuuunuw111mn/lnumnuunm1111/u1111 �,nnnll/nnlunmunl■nnunnmm�/ununumununnnumnmuuminn. W III/11111/IIIII/Illn/IIIII/IIIII/IIIII�IIIII/Inll/IIIfill 111 uuNo nu_um/ulD/_uuuunuuwgnnmin - \1011■Illtltllltl■IIIII/III/I/IIIII/11111111111/111n/Iptl/IIIII/11111111111/IIIII/Illniu�� ...,.1111■■I��� ..• IIL,.,.._...�...•.,. _,... 111....,■■ ■■ on iiii'' ilii 11 -1 M11111111111-11 uiil m� ■■I_ II n■ ■■ ■■ uu L. ISO .■ ■■ ■■ r1, - 1in■■uu ■■ ■� - -1 Filii%•g5i:� 11 11 `O umuunuunuunuuuuunwuumnllnu 111/I '7.%illl/11111ri..�cgl �_ II II 0 II/IIIII/111111111111111111II1111111111111111111111111111111111111/111111111111111111111 IIIV'%.it111n1I/IIIII/Illi,:� II II III � ,.nuuuunninuulunuuuuunuunuuulal._,...._,...._....._�...._,_..._. ON nmuilnnvumum;a� ■1 mol■■ 111 ■■i I ■ ■■ ME. � ■■ :..■, ■■ ■■ 1 ■I ■■ nmm�nl/uumuurnnummn I/Intl/n"�^_-1�IIIIIr11nl/I��i ,g11�\IImU'�.1111 :111.•. - �I!'�I!� ■• 11 �iiinminlllunriiin�____--- 11mul�mm�nn�mmmmnn -• -- •uuuumm _ oo _II r✓ a / •,I . i■ni1i■11-1-0 0-11-11-0 1-11-11-0 Omit n 11111 mi01n1 IN II – –Nlllli/IIIII/n1111�11111/IIIIIrIIIA/VIII/VIII/1111/Illtlrllltl/IIIIICI liiumnmulnnmm�niiiit� iiiiillilnYii7-'11'11111 ------------imii�liiniiiu�iilii�lunnuu/1111. ,•arlurlrn/wll/rlln u1mu11/nntruln/1un uumnlmnnunnlge nmr■linnunnl■lummmmnmlmmnumne!11.� =-1 m!nminmm�innuulnnnnnmm�l e�Inummn■nnu+llnrll'm +nmmmnunnnlrnl�lrnlnunnomm�nme1 -=:.:.riunrmmmmunlrnul/unl/1: nluunnumnln�s- .._.__■umm�unun■uumun 0 :nnminrnmrnnl■u nminrmnrunl�: �I ---. �1-1uulrmruum!laamwsnlnuumniumnnl/nmlmimui ilk••-■•__ •■■• uin[•lL:�r:��II• _ : �m:Ini nnilm�i:�lliml =�11murni ml: Iunl ions Ill mnmltnmnlin 111 rmmtill :InrIm'tn■'ntm'm�u'lr nulrnu:: _ ,I■I.■nnnllm nnilil/li a. 1, ---- nnmm0 . nnunm 1 I■nl�ulllnq,_.: 111/Imm�nrtiul'. 111111.1,, Ln ilimnnl/nnu r/mm11_�_.■�111mnt/ nuunnnnnnnnunln:.- nnuilililninimlii �unliunlnmlmmmml Till— Imm. �=- /nlmnlnulln/nnm1 lil ,:�!!�AL�!I�nnnlnl/mmalun' --.aiiiiimm�lnrnlm!u1 Er_� ' --__ n/ilii�iiii�iiimiiiil�iiiiliiill• -' III fill 1la11111 ■1 !nl/nulnumlutn --:/miilimmmlumnnmm_ - ' in/mmmmmm_mmmn - I un■unl■nnl■1111–�III -- ---- --------- }innummi1111ru1niliill�nlll�iliili!—_ _.III .mmu11n1u1nr'q 11/IIIIfrlllfninl 11�uj1■Illllrllllll nOn ii 117!7 r1■1 f1■7 r117►.Air I Iil11�IC� i1- �Il�I11111�11 °° mnauuln "" 111111111/1 I��'I III III n - nrnm/nnl� I,��'I��I 1111111I1I s 111111111111 - _ r unnmm��l i'T��Immmnn, m =e s - =-� 111 IIIIIIIk- �kI111111111111111111111111�.,= _= - — _;111111 I� _�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �==-�-'����"�'`-�-�`�"��'e`• CI =' -_ --�' Iiuniiiliiuilililililin717rnni■iliniuTnumiuuiumnYl Oiiiil _ ■mmnm/nn/mn/mnunmmmnlmnnumn/Iun111mn:-.----_--_---- m IilimilTinnilmnim7limTul�n,� :•I��n:nl:i:iuniu7nrm`1i■mniil7 nrlunnn�l.1.= .I.1111111/nuuununlnminrunl�nln/Iililimnnunriuluu------------ 1 m :..�nnlrmmnu ruumunu Ilia =1F =e nunn11nuunulnmunrnnlrnnannunul/nuunnlruiuunlrnuim111n minnnnnnummm lets :,•nnmmm!un/mn ne!: 1 ./limmmmnr`nm�lnr fm�r fu[oil r�ltduunrinnnun/!nm' uunnn/nnmgnnm_ iu�...._r■uuuloun.um:: �=-'�_..-unuunnun 1111 nm w 1 111111111 nm ounnnuuununnnr.: l- __ jp■IIIIIr11111�11111■I�nlllllllrh��' VIII ■1111—.111. - uC�/I Ir 111 I�R11I11lun21 i IILI;nl���liini li����� ��I;PillIII IIII III III �� mm Inlet m 11111/11� 1 uu►_/In1 11111 m' Irn nla �� 1111 _ n/n1..11.mm n1—n1tu IF"ii rrr�" – — ililirililli I Il1Tq■nil rIl Imulmnlnn /VIII/Illlu�.. 1pj_I6.� m■aauu...... uuuuuuuln■uw■iuuwuudll 'llnr1111I/11111/Illllrll 1111 © 11111r11111■111111 11/11111/11111/IIII!�11111■Illmlll 1111/11111rIllllrn111r11111/11111/11111/11111/11111....../In numumnnqu11l1n„,1, nunrmrmw uF I III lI/III 1/°11/0in!�1111111 uunuruul/uuunnuuuuuulruununln C- n�I11mIllllrIII` 11111/VIII/Inllil IIIrnlll/III,,...._...._,!..............�...,....�......�.....�...�...... umm�uunlmllln ---- ._. _._...__ _. I/mmmmunlr I - fuliuumuiloii iii uummmmm111n I ��_ -i � I-- _ _ _ III f■ ■ 11■11.1■1111■11111■ -_ - ��is _ _ _ o��._o _ _-lot.uar: �.IIrI1111111111rI%a� - �Tiiu u.n.ui�nurnniil1111rII1nrI11mII111r11.�� --nn$uiuiii7i7i7r71ililil�uii7.in !illl■16 InII1r1I1Il1lI1rul1l■null111uIi1lI1url1lU■nlrI1fu1l1l11urlLlIu1lr1u1lll1nurl!lIn1l:■'tu1I��l�m�l%Il�linrllull;llulI,�IuuI-LISwI��dI•u$Ir�nn%I1ng•11nn11um:V.lSur'uVumI�uuIr�Iaulrl�.uIu.I�ull�IuIiu_IuIu•I�r,.uI�I�lbnwl0:�u1rru_uI-u1u1_ululcrtll-luul.=lul.r_ul-lul_nr_unllcull........... runrrltl.liwlulllrlln■i wII,,l,n --_n.r-l m S % a■IIr1n1■nrllillrlalm111/uiIriI�nIrlllIlIl■lrlll:llalnrullmlll�nllll ;?.l 1ulllnusrIlinnlnnlrlia[q11nminls JIII1III1lnwl11I.. lunnunr11l1unnlrwmm111lnlull !r�=�:Iljlnr,rI1l1l1rl1 €nr.l•enI1•r1m11m1mrunI1nr�11wnI 1mrnIl1imIn1t1I 1nmrnuIl1tu11I11r1n1:nnnrnl-mrI .n.n nlm.,i : llltllh�;. ■• •■ iii m :: © 1111 11 11 11 ii r���, �� �� `` © "•""' 1111 11 11 11 ■■ nl III) ■■ -,:Inlilinn 11 11 11 ■■ Inlllllllrlllllri:,>_� _"��--_---_ - -"�il�llillrlll1111111 :u.. -- Illlllrlllllrlllll�lllllrn.i,_,� Illlrgnunnl■nlnrinl '71�IIIII�IIInrI111Ir11111■III"%^ ='!IeI111I�.>� rlllllrlllllrl1111�1111n111111�11111�111 nnnmm�lrnninnnruuirn,, nnnuumm�unmrm "-:1"niiiiuluuuuwnrunul!1.:- nrnu,.:_n�gnlamllrnlnrintlrmwmtlrl .Immmulnmulnnmmmninilil:�:.�_�nlnumm�nlrnulrl s.�fi�iilnnunuumnnlrnnln .- �nnru�-:=!.wun.unuunnlnnnnnm 111,11' 1111 nla l'nor nor,non nut.', .111 r r i =i�►r��►r�����ILij_--- =_-=�==�= _:►�1== „iI1111rI1111rI111i;�� ---------- ��d11�I1111rI1111rI111llllllnllllllrlllllrl1111■11111■11111■Illllrlllllrl ��g111rI1111r IIIIIrIIlllrllllnllllllrlllllrlllllllllllr6���in`��-u.irTniun �� %dll�lllll�lllll�lllll�lll��/IIIr111nrnI1lUllllrlllNIIIIIr111mg111rIIIlIrI111nI1111nlllllnl111111 ���r�llllrlllmlllflrlllltrlllmlllll■IIIIIrnlll■Ilhi.�'�11■IIIIIrlllll■I1111:�� -----:,.�liminuumnlnrnl• nnrmnrnlnrmmnnlrmnrnlnmlmnnlrnnlrmmnnlrnuuml ufwunrnlnrinnnunrinnrnlnrnlnrmm..�lmm�nmm�rl..>, iiiuiiillrlunmin■urIll lnrz,,mnniuunnumnlmulfl1111nrn11nunulllllrlllllrlllmlllfl■°O1rlt /\�Irnnlrmm�lmrunummulnrwmumrlu> almulnminnnr_ n■uunnlmulnnumwny�nilunmlanmm�lmmnwuuluminnnnnnnmulrmnnminnnrt, ■■ ■■ oii� riri '='11111 - 11 ■■ ■■ ~ ■■ ���■ ■r III��III u u rr'r�lu'u ul 11 ■■ ■■ ■■ ■���I ■■ ■r r■ Irrlrr, rr�r1 m111T1 ■■ ■■ rrl��l,■■,I■� ITI"ITI �1 ■■ n n'u,;u:u _ ■■ ■■ a ��,�� n mlnunuurnnnnrnslrilnl' Mil I Crnnlrnr_ni_n nllll� _ �Rcl _-:IUI.II�.- rn p1ATER BUDGETS: x fes.-�. TT ! I xSAS LINE�Rw. W —. -+�—�-1 —4 _ �x --_ -- — _ — _ --,r✓•—� � �.�....x......mrrrr.r.._arnrr. CONCEPTUALLEGENp ma ------- 1D— 0...... .... I 1 F LOT 1 0...:... d$�ggg I .� LOT5IN, I X0 mA I� LOT I SNRUD VINE<GROUND COVER LIST Z KILEY GT. wmm. a nw.ruxr�ar }�• --•—___"___ I PLANS 1 al •w�`�.,•,+..°M'-e'."•m:.•.m."0Y.^^ ..o.'. :,..• ~ w. IL r t �I I I d rone onxae.Rarvrrnwv ruxrinr w n z 1 z p� I IIjf': I PLAN 1 l i ^•,• O O :fRftt�I ? I I PLAN3� I 'vi •' tl ?NjI (x ~ p1 It i I 1i ro, ��mQo�ti�,,,,..,v.�n^......q... °i�uy.F-3rz I Il � SY _ ��....,. .. °• 0 U ui�rrvw-off _ �"'ma aw .g..x �y I� ��' ..,.x......,�.....x.,........:e.m............. a � :1 t r ` I I - TREE LEGEND UAT6 1-,Ij-t, QC z I WALL I FENOE LE6END: ®� .Y.ama...:..,re:.w.w w.:o...,..�.....a.... .Ij I I BASELINE P.D. i �n�;-„:LL..,:.. ..-^^-...mow-^..^^• � � '_�l IL'PLAN 1 I I i ' .nn-m:mrs:ww..en we.a.n:.0 J LAO-T, I .. B � ( PLANS WALLi FENCE PHOT05z ELEVATIONS: �b"IT w 3 I ?nv U clF:�nI�PLAN] r_ I: 3 ¢ _ QI m LOT] RILEY GT_. ` ., Z "I PLAN] ( `:••�'•� ”- G I LOT 3 O O- 2 8mm. m PLAN 1.a� LOTS lu W cr _ —IL •PLANS i — 4 I ' Y ruv. O LOT ! 1 I ? W _ V T- :rM1'I-O,%is-M1W�_ ®flli '®8M Y4 eJMjTtt!-'A MM1I IFI N .O' ,w..r.vw+e-✓.+ K U T ��u+pwx.ry..m.wr� pE'4i-cr-F I ��.4� axw. O.�rs ismx. 'Q N W 0 _ M=mo • ,illy =TT NAO C �GICJ�z Cdr (rivc/T74 . . . . . ....... . EXHIBIT Item 1-K 34 ---- • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith November 18, 2014 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966 — MARC HOMES, LLC: A proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of 1.89 acres into 8 lots in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way located at 13025 Base Line Road; APN: 1100-011-02. Related files: Development Review DRC2014-00645 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645—MARC HOMES, LLC: A proposal to construct eight (8) single-family residences in conjunction with a subdivision of a vacant parcel of 1.89 acres into 8 lots in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way located at 13025 Base Line Road; APN: 1100-011-02. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581. Site Characteristics: The project site is a vacant property with an area of about 82,000 square feet (1.89 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 270 feet (east-to-west) by about 300 feet (north-to-south). To the south and west of the project site are single-family residences. To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels; on one of these parcels is a small single-family residence. To the east is a condominium complex. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. • General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into eight (8) lots for a single-family residential development. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in.Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas range between 9,311 square feet and..' square feet while.the average lot area is 10,206 square feet. The required minimum lot area and minimum average lot area for lots in the zoning district of the project site are 7,200 square feet and 10,000 square feet, respectively. The depth of each lot will be between 123 feet and 147 feet while the width of each lot at the required front setback will be between 65 feet and 86 feet. The required minimum lot depth and minimum lot width for lots in the zoning district of the project site are 100 feet and 60 feet, respectively. All lots will be conventional, i.e., rectangular in shape, which will allow conventional house plotting. In conjunction with the proposed subdivision, the applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence on each lot for a total of eight (8) single-family residences. The floor areas of the houses_ (including the garages and covered patios) will range between 3,440 square feet (Plan 1) to 4,616 square feet (Plan 3). Two (2) of the houses will be one-story while the houses on the remainder of the lots will be two-story. This equates to 25% of the lots having single-story houses. This mix of one- and two-story homes is consistent with the policy adopted by the Planning Commission requiring that 25 percent (minimum) of the proposed houses be single-story. All of the houses will have two garages—one 2-car garage and one 1-car garage. The 2-car garages will be setback from the front part of the house while the.1-car.garages will face the side yard, i.e., they are side-entry garages. This will comply with Section 5.42.606 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan which requires that 50 percent of the garages be oriented or situated in a manner that minimizes its visual presence (as seen from the street). The houses on the comer lots (Lots 1 and 5) will be two-story. Although Section • 5.42.608 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan requires single-story houses on corner lots, it does allow for two- EXHIBIT J _ Item I-K 35 DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18966 AND DRC2014-00645—MARC HOMES, LLC November 18, 2014 Page 2 story houses provided that "extra deep setbacks are provided." The proposed setback of the houses from Base Line Road is 45 feet (the required street side setback is 25 feet). The architecture of each house will be generally consistent with the design requirements outlined in Section 5.42.600 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The applicant proposes two (2) types of architectural themes (elevations) — Country French and Bungalow, and six (6) footprints — Plans 1, 2, and 3 (and reverse footprints of each). Plan 1 will be one-story while the others will be two-story. The number of available footprints will comply with Figure 5-45 of the Etiwanda.Specific Plan. There will be a variety of movement in the wall planes and roof lines. Each house will have a front entrance that includes either a partially enclosed'courtyard or a covered, porch. Depending on the theme, a variety of materials will be incorporated into the architecture including stone veneer, wood siding, and stucco finish. There will also be details such' as wood brackets/rafters tails at the roof eaves, decorative trim and shutters around some of the windows, corbels, molding along the top of the stone veneer wainscots, and decorative garage doors. Chimneys are not proposed. The roofing on all of the houses will be concrete tile. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. All themes (all Plans) -Add more stone veneer to the rear elevations of each architectural theme to match the quantity of stone veneer applied to the front elevations. 2. All themes (all Plans) - Add shutters,.pot shelves, or other similar trim details to all elevations of each architectural theme. -With the exception of the north side elevation of the houses on Lots 1 and 5, it is not necessary to do this on the SIDE elevations at the FIRST floor of the houses as these details will have limited aesthetic value due to the relatively short side yard setbacks. 3. On the architectural themes that utilize wood siding, add wood siding to the side and rear elevations of each such as beneath the gable roofs and on where part of a wall plane projects beyond the primary wall plane. 4. Bungalow (Plan 1) — At the rear elevation, change the design of the roof at the Master Bedroom from a. hip .roof to a gable roof (that includes the "wood outlookers") so that its appearance is consistent with the gable roofs at the front elevation. - - -- -- 5. Country French (Plan 1) - At the rear elevation, change the design of the roof at the Master Bedroom from a hip roof to a gable roof(that includes the decorative vent) so that its appearance is consistent with the gable roofs at the front elevation. 6. Country French (Plan 2) - At the rear elevation, change the design of the roof at Bedroom 2 from a hip roof to a gable roof (that includes the decorative vent) so that its appearance is consistent with the gable roofs at the front elevation. 7. Country French (Plans 2 and 3) — At the gable roofs, add decorative vents similar to those beneath the gable roofs on the same theme for Plan 1. Item I-K 36 DRC ACTION AGENDA ® SUBTT18966 AND DRC2014-00645—MARC HOMES, LLC November 18, 2014 Page 3 8. Country French (Plan 3) — At some of the windows, add decorative corbels similar to those beneath the windows on the same theme for Plan 2. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. The molding along the top of the stone veneer wainscots shall also be stone and not foam. Staff Recommendation: With the above-noted design issues revised to the satisfaction of the Committee, staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of the project to the Planning Commission, and forward it to the Planning Commission for review and action. Desian Review Committee Action: The applicant revised the proposal incorporating the above-noted recommendations listed under "Major Issues". The Committee reviewed the revised proposal and determined that it had addressed the issues and is now acceptable for review by the Planning Commission. The Committee recommends approval to the Planning Commission. ® Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith Item I-K 37 Etiwanda Specific Plan Part 11, Chanter 5 BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Fig 5-2 VL LM K", LM All ,i"a.,aF.eeayK, •` �, =;%�i1.3•fRLi.';o Lot Area: minimum average ;"IWIM, 25,000 x;' 50011'a 10,000 1©00(1 6,000 in square feet) °r xzr- 'r'isr; :a.,a `ti�. :;&•. ::m; ;.'. c>t,.ry� `x. '� :�t';.:it!3t,'7:s.ti„ i':,rr:-; v' ..-.s!�.'`'•C..: _:lY���.•-;�4- 7I minimum " = x 20,000 ::%�r .4Y 7,2 0' _ rf0��� -y#.� �^ � ^"i:'..,•7�4N.Y�"'• 5, 00 (ins square feet q ) '.:�;;,;, •;r"� ::k;,. a�<:'-.'I '`� '":r•xY�i.::w!".ry •E.'°r•.�?.. -'�r'""J Number of DU's `:F}4 1/20,000 :lit ,: 1/7,200 0 1/5,000 (per lot area in square '2: 2 maxtlot feet) K .s ., =,:' 4 maxtlot ��yy++ �:r* "yi `,u "y •* i;y ....M `'.:•: lt2r'`'� ai,•r,.,'-.t.vr;"!ir.:.;•� Lot Dimensions: minimum depth <` 200' 100 "IQ i 90 p Y; fie• tj' X Nllk ";dc, , i ;=7; :`:ala: r , minimum width .Y{rr}f- '?j 90 _ :e 60 50 min. :�x. ". lam, 'ice. �:=. at required ;:: f � �`""'`" 50%of . r.• - s front setback) °'Z- �M. �`;i =;�*� z:{, lots-55' i.•,..: min. ::�;_w;•Krr� �j m Jy '•}v'y`.c::' f3:. ..:'..'Iq',..: d.y,•. minimum frontage tr a� 40' '� t 40' a6- ` `:x' 30 r u, (at front p.l.) ,_• tw„ :r�,..�. fir„ '$ .;N y' i, .`.'. :..�.;.,r'i•.tir u•.,;?f;M, Setbacks: ::;fix•: .mss 7 .. t ::�z'-f,`!^'.�`.++::r• ,,,. !......Far :;r...kr x' ^,�h ' P'-111 4v 3 `T � 30' �:ti• 4.i�j ' 'y"= .•, r front .' �. �•�� 25 ;,.2 �`��.� 20 avg. s• r...,• vary±5' va �•a:r~.._ �M.- rYM side(street) - ".: 25' tG� "t;; 25' h;r:.�w �. ^J:: .n.' _}, : `iii•..�:"•i. i�:'� - :.12'.=�r`:>" :.,i:3yp»r`•rJ �'/•" ='�i'_I ice• •4.•,t i�il side 2 `' 10/20 _ . I 0*/15 * x "I Y- it ' `ii Total 15' Tiifal"a 5':' Total 15' building separation 15 min. 15rniti= '': except - where - adjacent 1 2 stories Z"s[cjries -: -20 min. 20S rear 6b`;;,. .. 60' 25�";fV.; r a:.. , 20 15 Lot Coverage 2Q%o:"'::; 25% 3Q.�o ' 40% 404/0: 50% 50?/(:":,./ . (maximum%) 5-9 11/01 EXHIBIT K Item I-K 38 Etiwanda Specific Plan__ Part A Chapter S M" _. ... VL �. LM LM** -. On-site Windrows' 507ac N/R N/R (in lin. Feet/ac) Streetside Required Require Required r. Landscaping d (prior to occupancy)2 Height Limitations 35' 3535' * .0 lot line not to be used at project boundary ** These columns apply to parcels located within the Etiwanda South Overlay District(See Figure 5-1). . e.. Existing lots of record of 1 acre or less may be exempted from this requirement. 2 Custom lot subdivisions may be exempted from this requirement. ON 5-10 8/96 Item I-K 39 Cffy OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APR 0 12014 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM A CUCAMONGA xWt �NNJNG (Part I - Initial Study) Iso Planning Department ;1029 ng In USS the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) (909)477-2750 t f-ii:1 Ahic ­WWO000:9... .. wwm 6tdifilbem ato bt. 0.bath Cco!n eprop ,W,ani P-01i 01"i Otdipiancesi ancr,, may rev sio 11�40 '(018P�,p f iii, ltn. • ah r n0ppOk., Y P mix, • pro'T ,.-aopi oatio 'W 641h fbffi;�' b U 11% r6--omplotict itlit swd, d dl d f !s .;. . . 9""'' ,- n9til 6 6• '.6 o"k an it -P 04006*111-01 00, ig 1*00-dit- re 4F rc C"01 P 4A 7.777-; all .-at . 4..0,1 hij .. �q ffikfil,.4 A 7 T9 , .....app. iWit�Vllmno sc" 4 Itt . 1. Q.-re,po P Th lid c9m or. U 1W 3 4 . unless: KP lftic�,� KA61 7, th- A 4106 Y1, t lbl*t ErE it' 6A �.W* P df e. mns Ott' 40 da 0 'k " ,a d S. a • GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETEAPPLICA77ONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submfi-t—al, City staff will not be available to perform workre required to provide missingintbrmation. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains. "I tom 70 Project Title: Name.5 Address of project owner(s): R40-C- W-AW,>, U 82-22- 0*,r� Name 6 Address Of developer Or Project sponsor.• 'bl-57- LJIWS AU. EXHIBIT L Page I of 10 Item I-K 40 Contact Person 8 Address: r�-(��+ � J •�z I�-�a-� f tp; 8za z r rz AN04. &,W&V /`t��Jl�.a� '^'��" �..t .�t c� }•s�iiu4 uJ4 ' •504- U4I o-ZL- ► , `� i�Z7c+l Name&Address of person preparing this form(ff different from above): Telephone Number qd q 'yrL1 ' J1 ?I PROJECT INFORMATION / • Information indicated by an asterisk(7 is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2.x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site,and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views i o the site from the north,south,east,and west views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): Sf).1 Rw OF S1 iNE QA/�Q� wL-S'1 g4A OF S41EU,M P1,44JE AK EAILTSALH vc EµN1E CC W�Y 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 'S) Gross Site Area(ac/sq.R.): 2 85 AcWcS 124 V)i S 1= '6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed I.C1 3 ACAZ!F-S 84,076) !F dedications): .._._ ..__...... 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): t� GP va w E c%-\ v�c��aEo. Page 2 of 10 Updated 9/2012012 Item I-K 41 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental • agencies in order to fully implement the project: T6�rar�uc IIXA.cr AA#-P, PtNOA- ZtIAr-r AA&.P. GO-NOw(7- PtPaµkT A+J.D R.a3�►.���y(a k�Gf1JNt�S. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography,soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological and/or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys,traffic studies): iE S�z'E "�N-F1u`'` Wxn i3iy�E0 S Nit bH P tAa--- atvo �M�ETf' wAM SJR(�VNpi> r �T ��-4 �s �x�snnjcr 5v�>_WV% 0.M p�+9 1z-1•�EE Sth�lG- E-q�y►�H �:s��o�'�ucks i�i4� �y���9 .�ror� n� sour}• � �usr�� St t- S%rs WWC& sH — su oUt-ko vAU ® ISS tp r7.w--- SID J'M. —Mem tS APPPnC,(1M4T kN '7 Few or F4�L Ir t NDot'N SA.-,T Q1W& T S aXM t,�-T C.OWNtCR. TFt� S tS'E 7D�S No- Mita At4m &,u srNc. ST12►�T13(lt3 A v� 2t✓ s tv0 YNI�+► SUc�lL Q,SO�S. 1 D) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): • Updated 9/20/2012 Page 3 of 10 Item I-K 42 Nc� w.u)LAu ci A t rugni_ CSR 441(-rr�LAA WtnAr t-4k smv- 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses. iEunkr— D. IS biu►OfiD kOk<.`o,AAM t�J��l-1 S�lrl�ltFlL bt— 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase,and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheets)if necessary. Tr10�qUo Poopg t� SVt3 9lu► rte O L Kry Etter t ��.ti RFs�o+�•�-n�l� Wl� . kS 1-'Cr A,- t4cv�c� RraK lass���� ►.�,r►-i rets o�r� , �►T- . or scenic 13) Describe the surrounding properties,including information on plants and animals and any cultural,historical, aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),inten,-4 ofland use(one-fafr*apartment houses, shops,department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height,frontage, setback,rear yard, etc.): �t.f� , �-h�t»c u ,ate. rr�,.�tr S�P�-av►s�aw r,� rs'4c �..a�5�' A4,40 X�sriNv P M�.+ec �rnc rte � I�r 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern,scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? Page 4 of 10 Updated 9/2012012 Item I-K 43 1.►O, T Si h 1 �. X14 C11.Adt k C(.;IV s is V)C,�t 7_fANk(__ hNh t�csn,ulf(�n►r� Use RAX r)-k( M..EA 15) indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Np AbNt Pt[b.NT t..1C11C_ A0,&gxAhA1=O LA-kl-k T4.r M OVaCX_ `16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: T em'57 x' rTwF'4 Vvtl►r 64-- tLF Mum ,avY1 (1&- P k aO ML GL'1" Ap0 AOL4:7 l 54,4 t CA10 f-1Pd. JJ+e E:XLMNb 1fU553 AQ.� NC� APr- -cam LoL_Aw tcay M 17) indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: $(� DQA+NS tP%>a • �LSE E9i sr1 hLk, C-A.)nbct .,TPAy L EN1u►e T W°.A A+Nrt1 S"ejZl 4 AAcr A"vq 1n44W I PATr> Tke Fxi s r iN.(. .0,44 .DwU N . 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gai/day) 5,()11n Peak use(gal/Day) b. CommerciaUlnd. (gal/day/ac) Peak use(gal/min/ac) 19) indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑Septic Tank Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the - Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gaUday) 2k b. CommerciaOndustrial(gal(day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units:_8 , Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes,minimum lot size and maximum lot size: 1D,633 TO 10,Oc{ • Updated 9/2012012 Page 5 of 10 Item I-K 44 as Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): wQ SalTc 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale FWce(s) $ Rent(per month) $ to .$ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: Coti+C!.�Pi�h� d�)+c,a� ,.•+C4� drt� �"��+-.�-jay-. 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment 8: a. Elementary: 3' 7 b. Junior High. I' c. Senior High COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial,industrial or institutional uses. 26) . Total floor area of commercial, industrial,or institutional uses by type: Page 6 of 10 Updated 9/20/2012 Item I-K 45 27) Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of employees: Total: Maximum Shift: rime of Maximum Shift.- 29) hift:29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City. -31) For commercial and industrial uses only,indicate the source,type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District,at(818)572-6283): r ALL PROJECT'S 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. SES. B MNEJr 1N(r \/44s a1-tkO LA-VO Ab-�N- pN!> viiG _Www �'�'tU4.1.Lt c�f�i,G�t�N Fcx1 '6c� l�.a�RaL �n Sb.�)� SC'gViLi�_ 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include,but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances,pesticides and herbicides;fuels,oils,solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property,as well as the dates of use,if known. ® VAMC— VUII JIJ Per r�*S ATMs Updated 9120/2012 Page 7 of 10 Item I-K 46 d.,k f 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses,along with the storage and shipment areas,shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. hV 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. 1 further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: f r Signature: Title: Gr %ate,✓t, a�/-.�.�-- Page 8 of 10 Updated 9/20/2012 Item I-K 47 449 R.5 W. 32'30" 451 452 2 150 000 FEET;(s) S TH RN3 IFI 1350 :T—J 0 132 .. /' 15 (s —Jl 3TM I 0•. II B - •I ASE .130 I I: �' L Etiw anda cjrl3 ,. II Q :ri .t =.c� II r 00 5 it —13 � It O 2 II 'fix n Im! ----�J� it - u �P II _-= PROJECT SITE MILL 01 TAlt II —)/L/2'20 0-1220 it sek It l/b'� FOOT •e BLVDs,'CORP 200 II �- :Ips -• .....,,� D/;` 1• •. ••� ay.: W o rat Q e3.:j ` Tan Park //io II eo - II ARROW ROUTE - ' _ /VSs ... ,o• � ;, II; 1150 a, /5p W W '' 30-- L Et1W WI :RAM.. •.• AVE. .�:�:�.;.,y inB1 _ •I 1J� N NT<E=i FE fi>_ sr Rochester Water Tank e - - ----- --- - ------- - --- ---- -- -------- Power la FEEDER ---- ------ ---- -- e� //o. 00 -- _.._.__.,,,: - •`, - =-- � EEL P L � ob .• neo====v = /080 'Well 1 I' ater'� a ell ¢ o; I nk �_II i i I'I 1 1050 I j ;; �• ';� n r ��•C CA A _ CORP BDY °SO ^ ; BOUNDARY1 SAN BERNARDIN ""r'F I AVEIIII �O o•' r I a % �� oS ag :Plant aReservD' _'�P II s= `•SII %\\ II \\� �F ' =III = \\ 0....:_ �•I ... .. If �\\ 1, I �/030 a,i:A°a�, \\ ""E. /020 W € j;ie°e@ e I DUMP DUMP iY 20 �yTL - L ::i VAS aiser 7 SITE PHOTOGRAPHY LOCATIONS BASELINE RD. -- EARTHWORK IMPORT AVERAGE OVER SITE.SAM C.r. 4'AVERAGE OVER SITE=i 1 C.Y.5'AVERAGE OVER SITE•14711221 C.Y. 6'AVERAGE OVER SITE•17,065 C.T. S 1'FOR EVERY P DIFFERENCE IT EQUATES TO 2,M C.Y. OVER THE SITE NN'3i'WE i.46' PROBABLE C0NS7RUC ION 0LIAN�71 237 . 124.83' K17.63 3, SHELBY PL. / No ANTICIPATED Dosr IDENTIFIED AT Tws nnE SAL t I BASELINE RD. ' 5 • REMOVE IXISTING 6'NIDE C0NCRETE SIDEWALK-450 L.F. • CONSTRUCT 6'NIDE MEANDERING SIDEWALK-250 L.F. Rffim EXISTING TREES AND CLEAR t GRUB-10 EA,3,7W S.F. 9,736 S F. 9,669 S.F REPAVE EXISTING BLOCK WALL-250 L.F. • CONSTRUCT 6'NIGH DECORATIVE BLOCK MALL-250 L.F. I EMMETT WAY • CONSTRUCT 6'CL40 AND GUTTER-235 L.F. CONSTRICT 18'WDE DRIVEWAY APPROw,EA, 147.30' 1?46gq I CONSTRUCT 4'AC OVER 6'CLASS 2 BASE(ASSINIED PAVING SECTION)-3,060 S.F. • INSTALL STREET LIGHT-I EA. �, • INSTALL FIRE HYDRANT-1 EA REMOVE LISTING BLOCK WALL,OR TOP PORTION-360 L.F. 2 C I NOTf: KN-SITE COST NOT CONSIDERED 9,760 SF. 9,883 S.F. 0 A � `o t.14. m.3o' na0' 4 �, 9,762 S F. 0 9,760 S.F. I r27.3o' 4 8 O � F 9,848 S.F. 9,9728 S.F. R I o D 30 6o 0 scab t=w 127.30' 124.W I HARK REVISIONS 1 DATE 1 B . N69'40'OU'E 457.25' . 1 SITE STUDY I FOR•n4RC NATES I SCALE 1 -3d IW COULTING fNGNINEERS,INC; DATE 11/1013 DESIGNED JC - CHECKED AW = OF 1 SHEETS ?swuwerm•mae m»ixs.fwo . PLN CK REF: i ;pu,amr.urHo. �as.sem� . F.B. :w.rw.aw 476.01 2!v .rr�; ,. � - ,.w- M �! ��M� ��.. !� 0;. �� :�.r- $, ,q� �! ; i ��..� Ib f � Yy tiw C'� ... - r,.-.,.� .., ,._ ... .��, r � � h a, � ;nr,�' rA� �'" ,t , t !. 3.1 hxt!rFKTvfi¢91SfxyJwKh�-l!.•.. 3�t t. 3. Looking north into the property from the south property line 4b 4. Looking east into the property from Emmett Way Item I-K 51 a< i S. Looking north from the center of the property 5 i Y i Sbyu�7f �Y ut` S. Looking west from the center of the property Item I-K 52 5. Looking south from the center of the property ti 5. Looking east from the center of the property Item I-K 53 City of Rancho Cucamonga - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART 11 BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2013-00645 2. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581 3. Description of Project: The proposed project is a subdivision of a property of 1.89 acre into 8lots (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966) and construction of 8 single-family residences (Development Review DRC2014-00645) within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way - APN: 1100-011-02. Also included is Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581 for the removal of the trees on the property to allow for the construction of the aforementioned houses. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Michael Lutz Marc Homes, LLC 8282 White Oak Ave, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • 5. General Plan Designation: Low Medium Residential 6. Zoning: Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is located on the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way. The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the south and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels; on one of these parcels is a small single-family residence. To the-east is a. condominium complex. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties is Low Medium (LM) Residential District; Etiwanda Specific Plan. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive -- Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith Associate Planner (909)477-2750, ext. 4317 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None. Item I-K 54 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 2 GLOSSARY-The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD—California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR—Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR-Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG—Reactive Organic Gases PM10—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District.__.__.. . - SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan - ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (x)Aesthetics ( )Agricultural Resources (x)Air Quality (x) Biological Resources (x)Cultural Resources (x).Geology&Soils (x)Greenhouse Gas ( ) Hazards &Waste Materials (x) Hydrology&Water Quality Emissions ( )Mineral Resources (x)Noise ( ) Land Use&Planning ( )Public Services ( ) Recreation ( ) Population& Housing ( ) Utilities&Service Systems ( )Mandatory Findings.of ( )Transportation/Traffic Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated"'impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 3 ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION purs a t to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earli r or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imp s pon the proposed project, nothing further is re ui'red. Prepared By: Date: r , (� �`/� Reviewed By: Date: f 1 .. . .... ........ ... . Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 56 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact In orated Impact Iftipact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project. a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic --buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains,no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the south and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels,.while to the.east is a condominium complex. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. The house product associated with the proposed subdivision was reviewed by staff and the CiWs Design Review Committee. The architecture of the houses is consistent with the City's design and technical standards as described in the Development Code, and will be compatible with the architecture of the surrounding residential development. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of street lights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity_- The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans - which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area Of illumination to within the project site. Therefore, the impact will be less-than-significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) () ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 57 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 5 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP gftiSignificant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the south and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels, while to the east is a condominium complex. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga • according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability. is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land,timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the south and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels, while to the east is a condominium complex. The nearest agricultural use is Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 58 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map-SUBTT1 8966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact about 0.40-mile to the west of the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project:,. _ a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the as- applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (✓) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion,1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts)or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR.was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) Both the State of California and the Federal Government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (S02), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less(PM,o),fine particulate matter less- ---- than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PMio and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act,(CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 59 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 7 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyignifaWith Than pp 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact regulates stationary sources of pollution within in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (Os) , coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMlo), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide(NO2), sulfur dioxide(SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Non-attainment areas have ® additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone;PM10 and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts-of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality Impact Analysis was prepared by Urban Crossroads on March 3, 2014, that utilizes the CalEEMod methodology and CEQA Air Quality Handbook; April 1993 to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Green House Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction) Impacts - - - - m x�, oiss:Suriiimary`of 1c#ve . } W _ rail``Corst�ic�ioi%�(i1;tfay ithotit iBACYIs;= =- VOC NOx Ca SO,t PM,o PM2.5 2014 5.45 41.67 25.23 0.03 8.94 5.47 2015 5.07 28.82 19.98 0.03 2.09 1.95 Maximum Daily Emissions 5.45 41.67 25.23 0.03 8.94 5.47 Threshold 75 100 550 150 ENo 55 Substantial? No No No No No • Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 60 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g Significant MUgation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact VOC=volatile organic gases; NOx=oxides of nitrogen;CO=carbon monoxide;SOX=oxides of sulfur,PM,o and PM2.s=particulate matter Source: Air Quality Impact Analysis-(Table 3-4)(CaIEEMod Output) Urban Crossroads, March 3,2014 Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on-site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Fuqitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind,' and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the speck operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCS and are part of the Oa precursors. There will be eight (8) single-family residences constructed as part of this project. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed buildings will result in.approximately 0.48 lbs: of VOC per day during the coating phase. The emissions would occur after grading activities, near.the end of the construction period. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Emissions associated with architectural coatings could be reduced by using pre-coated/natural-colored building materials, using water-based or low-VOC coating, and__ using coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency. For example, a high-volume, low-pressure (HVLP) spray method is a coating application system operated at air pressure between 0.1 and 10 pounds per square inch gauge (psig), with 65 percent transfer efficiency. Manual applications such as paintbrush, and roller trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge have 100 percent transfer efficiency. Construction of the project would use either low VOC or HVLP spray methods to increase the transfer efficiency and reduce the daily VOC emissions. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 61 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 9 • LlnMibgabon LessIssues and Su ortin Information Sources: PotentiallyrnanPP g Significant Significant No Im act MO act Impact and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed single-family residences are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurrinq Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures(short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, • smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)on a project- specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the.proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 62 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mtigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally,contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated.soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with .local . ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt 'is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading,-operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 244nch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction=grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PMio) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Lona Term (Operational)Impacts Lona Term Project Operational Emissions Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 63 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 11 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact lIncorporated Impact Impact Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the.number of residential buildings/uses in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. Based on trip generation factors applicable to the project, long-term operation emissions associated with the proposed project, calculated with CaIEEMod, shows that the increase of all criteria pollutants as a result of the proposed project would be less than the corresponding SCAQMD daily emission thresholds. Therefore, project-related long-term air quality impacts would not be significant. Mitigation measures would not be required. mutn D = :• . _....:- ..... . ....._. ...• _:.. .s_ . .Jd �'Su "raer rnr hoot:Mit .orr Oq VOC NOX CO SOX' PM10 PM2.5 Area 0.48 7.94e-3 0.67 3.00e-5 0.01 0.0207 Energy 7.98e-3 0.07 0.03 4.40e-4 5.51 e-3 5.51 a-3 Mobile 0.37 1.14 4.40 8.90e-3 0.60 0.17 Total 0.85 1.22 5.10 9.37e-3 0.62 0.19 • Threshold 55 55 . 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact No No No No No No Source: Air Quality Impact Analysis-(Table 3-5)(CaIEEMod Output) Urban Crossroads, March 3,2014 to r l7ai�"';Ems�aDns f f#i' ,t _ ._ ._.. .._-" ... .-_ _.-. . ... •:lA[ntei'yiit�awt'�lla�fo' VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Area 0.48 7.94e-3 0.67 3.00e-5 0:01 0.01 Energy 7.98e-3 0.07 0.03 4.40e-4 5.51 a-3 5.51 a-3 Mobile 0.35 1.19 4.05 8.28e-3 0.60 0.17 . Total 0.84 1.25 4.75 8.66e-3 0.62 0.19 Threshold j 55 j 55 j 550 j 150 150 55 Significant Impact I No I No I No I No No No Source: Air Quality Impact Analysis-(Table 3-5)(CaIEEMod Output) Urban Crossroads, March 3,2014 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures(long term) Lonq Term (Operational) Emissions - The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR)analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water 'consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 64 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g significant MGgation Significant No Impact I carporated Impact impact 2) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 3) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 4) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and.weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan .FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.3). C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR(Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with .the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located immediately adjacent to sensitive receptors—single-family residences. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above and the following mitigation measure will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. 5) All new development in the City of-Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast. Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths)in new development on or after March 9,2009. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving.. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from residential uses would be like that of cooking and gardening. The proposed single-family residences are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, there will be no impact. Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 65 Initial.Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page-13 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiallywith Than Signnificaificant With Significant Na Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands'as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with ® established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) (✓) ( ) (..) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located on the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way and is characterized by single-family residential development to the south - . and west.--To the north,on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels while to the east is a condominium complex. The project site is in an area that has been disturbed by the construction of residential development to the east, west, and south, and infrastructure including streets to the north, east, and west. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources. The site is dominated by low grass and a grouping of trees. Per an Arborist Report prepared by Professional Design Associates on May 13, 2014, there are nine (9) trees on the property: one Manna Gum tree, two(2) Evergreen Ash trees, and six(6)Avocado trees. Removal of these trees may affect bird species considered sensitive during the breeding season as the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Department of Fish and Game Code both prohibit interference with the nesting activities of native bird species. The following mitigation • measure shall be implemented to address this impact: Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 66 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s�t� M ly With s�Thdin No Impact Inco orated Impact Impact. 1) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with CDFW protocols. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a pre-construction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. b) The project site is located on the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way and is characterized by single-family residential development to the south and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels, while to the east is a condominium complex. The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities; no riparian habitat exists on-site. Therefore, there will be no impact. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Therefore, there will be no impact. d) The .City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere-of-Influence. The project site is located on the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way and is characterized by single-family residential development to the south and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels while to the east is a condominium complex. e) There are nine (9) trees within the project site but only one qualifies as a "heritage" tree. Heritage trees are subject to the City's tree preservation requirements as described in Section 17.80.050 of the Development Code. Heritage trees are defined in the Development Code as trees that meet several criteria including the following: all - eucalyptus windrows [and] any tree in excess of thirty feet (309 in height and having a single trunk diameter at breast height(DBH) of twenty inches (2!Q' .or more as measured four and a half feet(4.59 from ground level and warrant consideration for preservation or relocation. The applicant proposes to remove all of these trees (Related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581) and, therefore, project implementation will result in the removal of the heritage tree. The following mitigation measure shall reduce the impact to less-than-significant. 2) The tree that is removed shall be replaced with a new tree, on a one-to-one basis, of a minimum 15-gallon size. This tree is in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 67 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 15 ® Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially w'tn Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the- ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a• "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are'encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measuresto protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 68 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 16 Less Than Significant Less PoteIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significantally With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact lincoMorated Impact Impact avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of--Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last 'Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan;therefore,the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to,the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained.and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should-immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The project site is in an area that has been disturbed by the construction of residential development to the south, west, and east, and infrastructure including streets. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 69 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than Pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? • iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) . of septic .tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? -- - - Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within about 1.85 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3.2 miles north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing MW 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to MW 7.5 earthquakes is about 12.5 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to MW 8.2 earthquakes, is 14.5 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can • produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 70 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 18 Less Then Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant W igation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the. General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings/'-and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce Me emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM„u emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30.percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand (TuB, 0 to 5 percent slopes) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3:- Nd­ .-adverse impacts are anticipated.- d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand (TuB, 0 to 5 percent slopes)Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically not expansive. Therefore, there will be no impact. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. Therefore,there will be no impact. Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 71 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project.- a) roject.a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or Q indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Comments: a) Regulations and Significance-The Federal Government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). In June of.2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2)that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key • GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N20], hydrofluorocarbons [HFCs], perFluorocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]. The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit(°F)over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB)'32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State)at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 72 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant MGUgaUon Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact I Im act (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PMio, PM2.s, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station.The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 ate consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PMio, and PM2.s levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Proiect Related Sources of GHG's - Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources:Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads on March 3, 2014, the project would result in the emissions of carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], and nitrous oxide [N2O], and would not result in the other GHG's. As seen in the table, the proposed project would.result in a total of 10.17 MTCO2eq/yr from construction activities and 2.07 MTCO2eq/yr for area sources and 118.52 MTCO2eq/yr for mobile sources. Total project related direct operation emission would result in 120.59 MTCO2eq/yr. Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel- powered construction equipment and-other combustion sources (i.e. Generators workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading, and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off=site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels.creates GHG's such as CO2, Cha, and N2O. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Construction greenhouse gas emissions will be 305.1 metric tons (10.17 MTCO2eq/yr when amortized over 30 years)according the Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads on March 3, 2014. Although the emissions are less than the de facto SCAQMD threshold of 3,500 MT/year, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to further reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 73 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 21 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Im act 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQIVID Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all.construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures'specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Lonq Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions • generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for"adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. .sv'i.,}'>:,"r'.". .gip�?4;sc'.7 ::�'� - - � •.*..:.. .,.C"'.'.,Lm _ :.], +'Y �,.;�„ „„*;,;.�g.;p,, - :�:.:.. • :'Pr0 aet�G�ee eGaff tSSiolt i' CO2 CH4 N20 Total" Area 2.06 1.80e-4 4.00e-5 2.07 Energy 27.73 - 1.08e-3 3.90e-4- 27.87 Mobile Sources 118.42 4.97e-3 - 118.52 Waste 1.91 0.11 - 68,82 Water Usage 2.78 0.28 4.30e-4 3.27 30-year Amortized Construction 10.12 0.002 - 10.17 Total 166.19 Threshold 3,000 Significant Impact No *MTCO2E Source: Greenhouse Gas Analysis-(Table 3-1)(CaIEEMod Output) Urban Crossroads, March 3,2014 Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 74 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant nretigation Significant No Impact lincorponsted Im act Impact NOTE: Table 3-1 in the electronic copy of the Greenhouse Gas Analysis contains errors;it was revised on December 8,2014 and is shown here. The project involves the subdivision of a property of 1.89 acre into eight (8) lots and the construction of eight(8) single-family residences which will result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate numerous design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's . ._ recommended measures to reduce. GHG emission including energy efficient materials in. the construction of the houses, energy efficient appliances, water efficient landscaping; shade trees;and sidewalks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate numerous design features including energy efficient materials in the construction of the houses, energy efficient appliances, water efficient landscaping; shade trees; and sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy(SCS)with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB)375. The long term operation emissions of the project will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed any of the SCAQMD's thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a significant long term impact with the following mitigation measures: 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC)materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; Increased insulation Limit air leakage through the structure . • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems Install light colored"cool' roofs and cool pavements Install solar or light emitting diodes(LEDs)for outdoor lighting Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 75 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 23 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Litigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. • b) The project involves the subdivision of a property of 1.89 acre into eight (8) lots and the construction of eight (8) single-family residences. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution.. Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes energy efficient materials in the construction of the houses, energy efficient appliances, water efficient landscaping; shade trees; and sidewalks, and therefore is consistent with the policies of the General Plan.The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable,which . . .. . .. .. ...... ... . would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding onsiderations was ultimately adopted by'the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. B. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through .reasonably foreseeable upset • and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 76 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 24 Less Than significant Less Fi With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitlgatlon Significant No Impact 'n=rparated Impact 'mpact C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) () ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or. generate hazardous materials or wastes. However, this is usually associated with industrial operations/uses and some commercial operations/uses, and not associated with individual households; home maintenance activities where paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil are used; or construction activities that would use relatively small quantities of paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. The proposed project is a single-family residential subdivision. Due to the nature of the project, any utilization of hazardous materials and generation of hazardous waste is expected to be insignificant in volume and scale. Such materials would be stored and used at individual homes and would not be stockpiled. No - routine transport of hazardous waste is anticipated. Therefore,there will be no impact. b) Refer to 8.a above. C) There is a school, Grapeland Elementary School, at 7165 Etiwanda Avenue, located 800 feet to the northwest of the project site project site. However, due to the nature of the project, hazardous emissions, and/or handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste are not anticipated. Therefore,there will be no impact. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. Therefore, there will be no impact. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 77 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 25 iLess Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Potentially With Than PP g Inftin Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact airport. The project site is located about 5.25 miles northeast of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore, there will be no impact. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately-2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that will have access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan,which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. The project will have primary access to two public streets (Shelby Place and Emmett Way), will be immediately adjacent to Base Line Road, and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances. Therefore,there will be no impact. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City. However, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. Therefore, there will be no impact. • 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e). Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? • f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 78 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mtigafion Significant No Impact ' lincorporated Impact Impact g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche,tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) {✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB),Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (N01) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs)to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project. proponents are required'to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by IW Consulting Engineers, Inc. in June 2014, which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 79 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 27 • Less Than Significant [Signfican]t Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation iNo impact incorporated m actImpact water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)_that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by IW Consulting Engineers, Inc. in June 2014 to -— reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Post-Construction Operational: 1) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by IW Consulting Engineers, Inc. in June 2014 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the • use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, ' including monitoring provisions for a Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 80 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC201"0645 Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mtigation Significant NO Impact Incorporated Impact Impact minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to the CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. The CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge.because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and.the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading. permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Therefore, the impact will be less-than-significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and.City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, the impact will be less-than-significant. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the.amount of new building-.and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. .-The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 81 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 29 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. Therefore, there will be no impact. h) Refer to 9.g above. ® i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. Therefore, there will be no impact. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. Thin existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. Therefore, there will be no impact:- 10. mpact:10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? • c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 82 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 30 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Signfieant No Impact In orated ---Impact Impact Comments: a) The project site is located on-the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way and is characterized by single-family residential development to the south and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels while to the east is a condominium complex. This project will be of similar design and size to the surrounding residential development to the south and west, and compatible with the residential development to the east. The project will become a part of the larger community. Therefore, there will be no impact. b) The project involves the subdivision of a property of 1.89 acre into eight (8) lots and the construction of eight (8) single-family residences. The project site land use designation is Low Medium Residential. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the zoning designation, Low Medium (LM) Residential District, of the project site which permits residential development with a density of between 4 to 8 units per acre. The proposed project will be within the required density range of the zoning district. C) The project site is not located within any.habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) () ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local, general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City __. General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1;therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site;therefore,there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 83 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 31 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially with ThanIssues andSupportingInformation Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( } (✓} would the project expose people residing or working in the project area,to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is located on the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way and is characterized by single-family residential development to the south and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels while to the east is a condominium complex. The project site (is/is not) • within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. The project is within the noise contour of Base Line Road. Per the Noise Impact Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads on March 25, 2014, the unmitigated exterior noise level at lots fronting along Base Line Road will approach 70.2 dBA CNEL. The block wall of 6 feet in height that is already proposed to be constructed along the Base Line Road street frontage (at the north side of Lots 1 and 5) will mitigate this noise impact and will satisfy the City's exterior noise level requirement of 65dBa CNEL. To satisfy the City's 45dBA CNEL interior noise level requirements, lots fronting Base Line Road will require a Noise Level Reduction (NLR) of up to 23.5 dBA and'a windows closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g. air conditioning). Mitigation measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels: Interior 1) Windows: All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well-fitted,well weather- stripped assemblies, and shall have a minimum STC of 27. Air gaps and rattling shall not be permitted. The total area of glass shall not exceed 20% of the floor area in any room. 2) Doors: All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least 1.75 inches thick. 3) Roof: Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well-fitted or caulked plywood of at least .5 inches thick. Ceilings shall be well-fitted, well-sealed gypsum board of at least 0.50 inch thickness. Insulation with at least a rating of • R-19 shall be used in the attic space. 4) Ventilation: Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use. A forced Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 84 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 31 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su PP g ortin Information Sources: agnMia"y With Than SignlficaM Mitigation Significant No Impact lincorporatLd I Impact Im act C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is located on the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way and is characterized by single-family residential development to the south and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels while to the east is a condominium complex. The project site (is/is not) within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. The project is within the noise contour of Base Line Road. Per the Noise Impact Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads on March 25, 2014, the unmitigated exterior noise level at lots fronting along Base Line Road will approach 70.2 dBA CNEL. The block wall of 6 feet in height that.is already proposed to be constructed along the Base Line Road street frontage (at the north side of Lots 1 and 5) will mitigate this noise impact and will satisfy the City's exterior noise level requirement of 65dBa CNEL. To satisfy the City's 45dBA CNEL interior noise level requirements, lots fronting Base Line Road will require a Noise Level Reduction (NLR)of up to 23.5 dBA and a windows closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g. air conditioning). Mitigation measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels: Interior: 1) Windows: All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well-fitted,well weather- stripped assemblies, and shall have a minimum STC of 27. Air gaps and rattling--- shall not be permitted. .The total area of glass shall not exceed 20% of the floor area in any room. 2) Doors: All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least 1.75 inches thick. 3) Roof: Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well-fitted or caulked plywood of at least 1.5 inches thick. Ceilings shall be well-fitted, well-sealed gypsum board of at least 0.50 inch thickness. Insulation with at least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. 4) Ventilation: Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use: A forced Rev 8-18-14 Item l-K 85- Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 32 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact air circulation system (e.g. air conditioning) shall be provided which satisfies the requirement of the Uniform Mechanical Code. b) The proposed project is a single-family residential subdivision. The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As there will be grading and construction, there will be a temporary increase in ground-borne vibration and noise. The mitigation measures listed below in 12.d will mitigate these short-term impacts to a level of less-than-significant. C). The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation[Traffic and, as a result, an increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project is unlikely. d) The General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review arid approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance - with above noise standards or halted. 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measure shall then be required: 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a • national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 86 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 33 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g signMiearn Mitigation Significant No ` Impact In orated Impact Impact traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent.feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located about 5.25 miles northeast of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore,there will be no impact. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore,there will be no impact. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project site is located on the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way and is characterized by single-family residential development to the south and west._To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped - set of parcels while to the east is a condominium complex. The project involves the subdivision of a property of 1.89 acre into eight (8) lots and the construction of eight (8) single-family residences. This will result in an increase in population. However, this increase will not be substantial. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. The project is consistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation. The density was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Therefore,the impact will be less-than-significant. b) The project site is vacant. Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing or people.Therefore,there will be no impact. C) Refer to 13.b above. Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 87 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 34 ® Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wm Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Im act Im act 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) () (✓) C) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The project site is located on the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way and would be served by Fire Station #3 at 12270 Fire House Court located about one.mile to the west of the project site. The project involves the subdivision of a property of 1.89 acre into eight (8) lots and the construction of.eight (8) single-family • residences. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. Therefore,there will be no impact. b) The increase in residential units may lead to an increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. Therefore, there will be no impact. C) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. Therefore, there will be no impact. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Victoria Arbors Park at 7429 Arbor Lane, is located about 0.50-mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, there will be no impact. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in ® the levels of service, which could cause.the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 88 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiWith Than pp g Slgniflcant rd With Significant No Ini act lincorporated Impact Impact library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less-than-significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, there will be no impact. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase.. the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational. facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest-park, Victoria Arbors Park at 7429 Arbor Lane, is located about 0.50-mile from the project site. The project involves the subdivision of a property of 1.89 acre into eight (8) lots and the construction of eight (8) single-family residences. This project is not proposing substantial amounts of new housing or a large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval.will-require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) Refer to 15.a above.. 16. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) () ( ) (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant . ----------- - - components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management () ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () ( ) ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 89 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 36 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiallyignifawith Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact In orated Impact Impact d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g.,farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will.generate 77 vehicle trips.daily. The proposed project includes the development of 8 single-family residences. The Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) estimates that each single-family residence will generate 9.57 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the • site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. Therefore, there will be no impact. b) The Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) estimates that each single-family residence will generate 0.75 AM peak hour daily(total AM peak hour trips generated will be 6 trips) and 1.01 PM peak hour trips hour (total PM peak hour trips generated will be 8.08 trips) daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. The project site is located on the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way and is characterized by single-family residential development to_ the south and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels while to the east is a condominium complex. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. Therefore, there will be no impact. C) Located approximately 5.25 miles northeast of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. Therefore, there will be no impact. d) The project site is located on the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way and is characterized by single-family residential development to the south Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 90 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 37 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fw Than pp g Signifignificaantnt With Significant No Impact hoorporated Impact Impact and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels while to the east is a condominium complex. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. Therefore, there will be no impact. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency-.vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The proposed project involves the subdivision of a property of 1.89 acre into eight(8) lots and the construction of eight(8)single-family residences. The project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities,or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () 0 ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water.Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) V) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could.. cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) V) provider, which serves,or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? - f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and 7i ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the, western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for build-out of the General Plan. The project is required to meet Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 91 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 38 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) . The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water*system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. . e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No • impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other • current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 92 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 39 Less Than Significant Less Potentially nth ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mligation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact C) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The project site is located on the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way and is characterized by single-family residential development to the south and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped - set of parcels while to the east is a condominium complex. The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the project site is in an area that has been disturbed by the construction of residential development to the east, west, and south, and infrastructure including streets to the north, east, and west. The site is dominated by low grass and a grouping of trees. Per an Arborist Report prepared by Professional Design Associates on May 13, 2014, there are nine (9) trees on the property: one Manna Gum tree, two(2) Evergreen Ash trees, and six(6)Avocado trees. Removal of these trees may affect bird species considered sensitive during the breeding season as the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Department of Fish and Game Code both prohibit interference with the nesting activities of native bird species. The mitigation measures listed in the Biological section of this Initial Study will reduce the impacts to the nesting activities of native bird species and trees to less-than-significant. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement-of Over Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less.overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures . would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant. impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. Rev 8-18-14 Item l-K 93 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 40 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of.Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive(check all that apply): (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH#82061801, certified July 6, 1983) (T) Arborist Report (Professional Design Associates, May 13, 2014) • (T) Air Quality Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads, March 3, 2014) (T) Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Urban Crossroads, March 3, 2014) (T) Noise Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads, March 25, 2014) (T) Water Quality Management Plan (IW Consulting Engineers, Inc.-, June 2014) Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 94 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 41 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly n ig ificant env' onmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: / Date: / 11.(3-- Print Name and Title: M/� �<- __ • vi f l-"i��..�f C �-•rte � �-�� Rev 8-18-14 Item I-K 95 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 Development Review DRC2014-00645 This Mitigation Monitoring Program(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components- This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. ® 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will .be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Item I-K 96 Mitigation Monitoring Program Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff s is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on.the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms Win-impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP.andshall be approved by the Community Development Director or. Planning Director prior to the issuance of building_permits. Item I-K 97 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 Applicant: Michael Lutz, Marc Homes, LLC Initial Study Prepared by: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Date: December 10, 2014 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Fre u ricy Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance "i t, Short Term (Construction) Emissions 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction 3 site for City verification. A 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, PD/BO C Review of pians C 2 CD the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance BO B Review of plans A/C 2 standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Page 1 of 13 I Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any:on-site haul BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 roads. Phase grading to prevent the BO C Review of plans A/C' 2/4 susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering ractices. . Sweep streets according to a schedule BO C During construction A 4 3 established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high B0- C During.construction A 4 winds (i.e., wind speeds. exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard . BO C During Construction A 4 ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain Page 2 of 13 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize BO C Review of plans A/C 4 electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Long Term Emissions 1) Landscape with native and/or drought- resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide. passive solar benefits. 2) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous 3 Sources MSC-01 measure. 3) All residential and commercial structures shall BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low- CD polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 4) All residential and commercial structures shall BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 5) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions Of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. k. ter. '420'. 1 ';:'• ::... :, - '�• - •�`'° cc33t�n Sl ,BII scal ,Re r as t;ti :,; :,• :;; s , 1) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any PD B Prior to construction D 2 other construction related activity is to occur Page 3 of 13 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to' initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer.setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and`'consistent with CDFW protocols. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. ' Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a pre- construction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. 3' 2) The tree that is removed shall be replaced with PD B Prior to construction D 2 A a new tree, on a. one-to-one basis, of a o minimum 15-gallon size. This tree is in addition to the trees that are required by the Development. Code for new residential development. _ ... . . .. ... ........... ...z...>. .. ,. .. ,-..... ... ..... :<..E _.< . . ..:e.,. „a... '.I:.2 ,.:5':;:ar y�r...,.:..:,-` .at"•�'�rr.;�ia7�< '.,�. .T1:c::Y:::::✓ ...... .� .. ✓.. ......,> " Y. , ... .._x.... .... .. a ..[ .._.:...,�. ... ik........�..a :- . .- .. _,......_...3+.•s.._..,{...n, 1. .. a .... s•.s.. . -, .. ...8.:}.�.;a. .` =ii,.. nk1<.`Tc :P.,. .:'t[L F....r `�:.�'= f... w 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor. construction activities, to take . appropriate measures to protect or preserve ' them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 undesignated sites from demolition or significant modificationwithout an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Page 4 of 13 Mitigation Measures No.! Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance • Consider establishing provisions to PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with P/D B/C Review of A/D Section 21083.2 Archeological Plans/Report During resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse Construction project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 management report, documenting the 7 inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project N area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Page 5 of 13 Mitigation Measures No.l Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for MonitoringFrequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or PD B Review of report A/D 4 animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the-program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor; trained PD B Review of report A/D 4 and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to ,the site full-time during the B interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 being cleared or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should. immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all PD D Review of report D 3 recovered fossils for documentation in . the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino Coun Museum). Submit summary report to City of PD D Review of report D 3 Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to Museum. Bernardino Coun - - San Bern ------ ?n ....... . ...............:.:... - - _ ....... .. .n, .. .. ..... a . 5. 2:} :.�`,a-, :Cs:'s•• - .�.:'. ..., r:t ....is ...F'.. .:r,4.. :'.?F•: .. .�:'(...., .}. .. ..G �.. .. .. .: .. c .. • .. r . . ., .. ... .,.::.: „ai•...:. � n' fit.:.• s. s.•. Y n 1 ! Q .jr. .r A>x p.i...:•sci•,.r......•{':'r . ?,_. ..-.:•.Y .:....n. ....s ,.g ,rc;J. '7.�, .x, _t... - - .Se, . .9.y - M':':<i'I':�rK. .�r�..°5:... 4?, - 1) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD Page 6 of 13 • Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions.for -implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept BO C During construction A 4 according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when BO C During construction A 4 wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction 1 A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to. all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. S. coon � A Short Term(Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that BO C During construction A 4 assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily. or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select BO C During construction A 4 construction , equipment based on low- emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more BO C During construction A 4 than 5 minutes. Page 7 of 13 Mitigation Measures No:/ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be BO C . During construction A 4 utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to BO C During construction A 4 ' interfere with peak-hour.traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall :be BO C , During construction A 4 supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 1) Construction and Building materials shall be BO A During Construction C 2 produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient,' recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC)materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California BO A During Construction C 2 3 Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: 0 • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space. heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures,and appliances • Landscape and developed 'site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool". roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting . diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting Page 8 of 13 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method R_ Verified Sanctions for -implementing Action for Monitorin Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. Design .building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. 0 Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and CE A Review of plans C 2 demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. ton 9, .. . . . .a. .• _ . �::::� -�: . dol .. _. . .. ... . r ._.,._. ..:�. .;t.. r o n .. .. .... d.Wate - ..a Y r. Construction Activities - 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 permit applicant shall submit .to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Page 9 of 13 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring . Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date!Initials Non-Compliance 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall :be included to ensure that any erosion which; does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 3 as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. G 4). During construction, to remove pollutants, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 street cleaning will be performed 'prior to storm events and after the use off water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the.site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by IW Consulting Engineers, Inc. in June 2014 to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) The developer'shall implement the BMPs BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by IW Consulting Engineers, Inc. in June 2014.to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping.plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of Page 10 of 13 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. 'Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading Activities 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 214 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural 3 measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in o June 2004. 2) Prior ,to issuance of grading, or paving BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. . . ., _ f? �.... .......... . •}.. ... .......,is .. <.... .5 >.Sect o No e w '°'•'' ' Interior . ..':._:. ::::;:,..... ._...:: . .. . 1) . Windows: All windows and sliding glass doors PD B Review of plans C 2 shall be well-fitted, well weather-stripped assemblies, and shall have a minimum STC Page 11 of 13 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance of 27. Air gaps and rattling shall not be permitted. The total area of glass shall not exceed 20%of the floor area in any room. 2) Doors: All exterior doors shall be well PD B Review of plans C 2 weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least 1.75 inches thick. 3) Roof: Roof sheathing of wood construction PD B Review of plans C 2 shall be well-fitted or caulked plywood of at least .5 inches thickness. Ceilings shall be well-fitted, well-sealed gypsum board -of at least 0.50 inch thickness. Insulation with at least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. 4) Ventilation: Arrangements for any habitable PD B Review of plans C 2 room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use. A forced air circulation system (e.g. air conditioning) shall be provided which 3 satisfies the requirement of the Uniform Mechanical Code. Exterior CD 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a BO C During construction A 4 construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 6) Construction or grading shall not take place BO C During construction A 4 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not BO C During construction A 4 exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer . shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development. Code Section 17.66.050. Page 12 of 13 I _ • • Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed PD C During construction A A as early as possible in the first phase. 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place .PO/BO C During construction A 4/7 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling 3 would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to 7 and from the construction site), then the _ developer shall prepare a noise mitigation o plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of.Verification Sanctions CDD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD-Planning Director or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO-Building Official or designee -D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds FC-Fire Chief or designee 6-Revoke CUP 7-Citation Page 13 of 13 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2013-00645 Public Review Period.Closes: January 28, 2015 Project Name: Project Applicant: Marc Homes, LLC Michael Lutz Project Location (also see attached map): Located within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way at 13025 Base Line Road -APN: 1100-011-02. Project Description: The proposed project is a subdivision of a property of 1.89 acre into 8 lots (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966) and construction of 8 single-family residences (Development Review DRC2014-00645). Also included is Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581 for the removal of the trees on the property to allow for the construction of the aforementioned houses. • FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would' avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Reportwill not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or -Fax (909)477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. • January 28 2015 Date of Determination Adopted By Item I-K 111 RESOLUTION NO. 15-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966,A PROPOSAL TO SUBDIVIDE A VACANT PARCEL OF 1.89 ACRES INTO 8 LOTS WITHIN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD BETWEEN SHELBY PLACE AND EMMETT WAY, LOCATED AT 13025 BASE LINE ROAD;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1100-011-02. A. Recitals. 1. Marc Homes, LLC filed an application for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subjgct Development :-- Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of January 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence. presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on January 28, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant property located at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way; and b. The project site is a generally square parcel with an overall area of approximately 82,300 square feet(1.89 acre). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 270 feet(east to west) and 300 feet (north to south); and C. Immediately adjacent to the south side of the project site and to the west, on the opposite side of Emmett Way, are single-family residences (Tract 16454). To the north on the opposite side of Base Line Road is a largely undeveloped set of parcels; on one of these parcels is a small single-family residence. To the east on the opposite side of Shelby Place,is a condominium complex (Tract 16455, Brighton Etiwanda Condominiums); and d. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties is Low Medium(LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan; and e. The proposal is to subdivide the property into 8 lots for single-family residential ® development; and f. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure-5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas will range between Item I-K 112 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-08 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 2 9,311 square feet (Lot 4) to 11,814 square feet (Lot 5), which are in excess of the minimum of 7,200 square feet that is required. The minimum average lot area is 10,206 square feet,which is in excess of the minimum 10,000 that is required; and g. This application is in conjunction with Development Review DRC2014-00645 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract map is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the District in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property with an area of approximately 1.89 acre into 8 lots for single-family residential development. The underlying General Plan designation is Low Medium Residential; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The tentative tract will comply with the technical standards described in the Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Plan including minimum lot area, minimum lot width, and minimum lot depth,and all required public improvements including sidewalks, curbs, and gutters will be constructed; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed.The tentative tract is a subdivision of property for residential purposes. The project site is vacant and is surrounded to the west, east, and south by residential development. No amendments to the General Plan or Zoning Map are required nor are any variances or exceptions from the development standards necessary for the project; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The property is generally vacant. Staff reviewed the proposed project and determined that the project,with the exception of impacts relating to noise and air quality, will have no significant impact on the environment. The noise and air quality impacts,with mitigation measures incorporated into the project,will be reduced to a level of less-than-significant; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems. ...-The -. .. . tentative tract is a subdivision of property for residential purposes. Adjacent to the south side of the project site and to the west, on the opposite side of Emmett Way, are single-family residences. To the north,on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels;on one of these parcels is a small single-family residence. To the east,on the opposite side of Shelby Place, is a condominium complex. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. There are no easements, for any purpose, on or through the project site. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for Item I-K 113 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-08 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 3 the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto,and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQK)and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial.evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and; based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the staff hereby recommends the Planning Commission adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. Therefore the Planning Commission adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's determination is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated Herein by this reference. Planning Department Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Item I-K 114 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-08 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 4 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be-applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if r silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in. accordance.with.SCAQMD-Rule..403 . requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB])daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter(PM,o)emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. - Item I-K 115 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-08 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966— MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 • Page 5 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 14). All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with CDFW protocols. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be mairitained-until--the nest has completed its cycle as determined-by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a pre-construction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. 2) The tree that is removed shall be replaced with a new tree, on a one- to-one basis, of a minimum 15-gallon size. This tree is in addition to • the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. Item I-K 116 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-08 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966—MARC HOMES,.LLC January 28, 2015 Page 6 Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments,using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, .including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources Within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report -- with - original- illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited - - - to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Item I-K 117 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-08 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 7 • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent . (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. ® 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-or diesel-powered engines where feasible. • 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. Item I-K 118 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.'15-08 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 8 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured. locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled,and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including, but not.limited to, any combination of: • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade,prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool' roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED.Is) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or-install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. - -- -- -- _ • Design buildings to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low-flow faucets, dual flush toilets, and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Item I-K 119 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-08 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966— MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 • Page 9 Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to. remove pollutants street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by IW Consulting Engineers, Inc. in June 2014 to reduce pollutants, during and after construction, entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Post-Construction Operational: 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by IW consulting Engineers, Inc. in June 2014 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to • ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be Item I-K 120 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-08 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 10 submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and .Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Windows: All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well-fitted,well weather-stripped assemblies, and shall have a minimum STC of 27. Air gaps and rattling shall not be permitted. The total area of glass shall not exceed 20% of the floor area in any room. 2) Doors: All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least 1.75 inches thick. 3) Roof: Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well-fitted or caulked plywood of at least.5 inches thickness. Ceilings shall be well- fitted, well-sealed gypsum board of at least 0.50 inch thickness. Insulation with at least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. 4) Ventilation: Arrangements for any habitable room shall be suchthat any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use. A forced air circulation system (e.g. air conditioning) shall be provided which satisfies the requirement of the Uniform Mechanical Code. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. Item I-K 121 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-08 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 • Page 11 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050,as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips(counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: • Item I-K 122 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-08 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28; 2015 Page 12 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item I-K 123 Conditions of Approval P} Aft �'VCHO UCAMONCA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT18966 DRC2014-00581, DRC2014-00645 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City 'may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are • not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 4. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final- map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans ,and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 6. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side. -and-.rear property. lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 7. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with. Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD) Standards. 8. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special "street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. • Printed:1/12/2015 www.CltyofRC.us Item I-K 124 Project#: SUBTT18966 DRC2014-00581, DRC2014-00645 Project Name: '8 LOT SUBDIVISION ///SIS BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO.YOUR PROJECT. A. Plannina Department 9. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 11. On comer side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 12. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, 'or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning. Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits.. 13. Approval is for the subdivision of a vacant parcel of 1.89 acre into 8 lots within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way located at 13025 Base Line Road; APN: 1100-011-02. 14. Mitigation measures are required. for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant .shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds .may. be-_used by. the. City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and - report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 15. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 18. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 12 Printed:1/1212015 Item I-K 125 Project#: SUBTT18966 DRC2014-00581, DRC2014-00645 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION Nl SIS BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY • Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD-.110001102-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. ROJECT.A. Planning Department 17. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 18. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to .provide a single- wall:-- -Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 19. For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. 20. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 21. Development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Low Medium(LM) Residential District as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 22. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, all lots shall be rough graded to include building pads and interim improvements(for example, drainage)as deemed necessary by the City. ® 23. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. 24. All Conditions of Approval for Development Review DRC2014-00645 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581 shall apply. B. Engineering Services DeRartment 1. Emmett Way frontage improvements to be in- accordance with the City "Local" standards and the Etiwanda Specific Plan standards as required and including: a. Provide curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, sidewalk and street trees per City Street Tree Requirement Form, as required. b. Proposed drive approaches to be in accordance with City Driveway Policy. c. Provide 5800 lumens HPSV-equivalent LED street lights, as required. d. Provide traffic signing and striping, as required. e. Curbside drain outlet shall conform to City Std. 107-B or 107-C. Privately maintained' storm drain shall be approved by Building and Safety Division. Printed:1/12/2015 www.CRyofRC.us Page 3 of 12 Item I-K 126 Project#: SUBTT18966 DRC2014-00581, DRC2014-00645 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Deaartment 2. Install Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) improvements along project frontage on Base Line Road: a. Improvements including street trees shall conform to the Base Line Road Beautification Master Plan and be consistent with .the . existing improvements to the west (Tract 16454-1) of this development. b. An additional 11-foot. wide maximum shall be dedicated to the City as Lot "A" on the map for landscape purposes. c. The maximum slope within publicly maintained landscape areas shall be 3:1. Where slopes occur, a 1-foot flat area behind the sidewalk shall be provided. Slopes higher than 6 feet shall have a 2-foot wide flat shelf at the top, along the base of the walls. d. Keep the line of sight clear between eastbound traffic on Base Line Road turning right onto Shelby Place and vehicles exiting the driveway on corner Lot 5. e. Private perimeter walls shall not extend further than a projection of fronts of adjacent houses on corner Lots 1 and 5. In the case of Lot 5, lines of sight shall govem. Provide a mow strip to separate public/private maintenance. 3. Shelby Place frontage improvements to be in accordance with the City "Collector" standards and the Etiwanda Specific Plan standards as required and including: a. Protect existing curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lights, as required. b. All driveways shall have circular driveways or hammerheads so that vehicles do not have to back out. Northern most drive approach shall be a minimum of 88 feet from projection of BCR to the nearest edge of driveway. c. Provide street trees-per Standard Conditions. d. Protect or repair existing signing and striping, as required e. Provide restrictions to keep the line of sight clear for a vehicle backing out of the northern most driveway on corner Lot 5, such as red curb and a no-building easement. f. Provide a disclosure stating that attempting to go northbound from the comer lot may be difficult due to potential stacking for the traffic signal on Shelby Place. 4. The developer shall request that the City appropriately process a vacation of the City excess 10-foot right-of-way on Emmett Way. Said vacation of right-of-way shall be incorporated into the development. www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 12 .- Printed:1/12/2015 Item I-K 127 Project#: SUBTT18966 DRC2014-00581, DRC2014-00645 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY • Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 11000 1102-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 5. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval. or issuance of Building Permits 'whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. .6. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all .new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 7. Base Line Road frontage improvements to be in accordance with the City "Major Divided" and the Etiwanda Specific Plan standards as required and including: a. Protect existing curb, gutter, access ramps and street lights, as required. b. Remove existing sidewalk and construct curvilinear sidewalk, as required. c. Protector modify existing traffic signing and striping, as required. • 8. Tract 18806 has undergrounded existing overhead utilities along the north side of Base Line Road. The developer of Tract 18806 is eligible for reimbursement to recover the proportionate cost of the undergrounding. The fair share amount has been determined per Reimbursement Agreement City File URA-31 dated December 19,- 2012, which shall be paid prior to approval of the final map or building permit issuance, whichever occurs first. Said fair amount is $16,830.00 is based on City current fee which is subject to verification of annual increase, together with interest from the date of the agreement to. be based on current ENR (Engineering News Record) City Cost Index rate (Los Angeles). 9. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if• at least, 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted . to the Building _and- Safety.. Services Department. - Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 10. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 11. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 12. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but notlimited to: Base Line Road •Curvilinear Sidewalk Street Trees Printed:111212015 WWW.Clty0fRC.us Page 5 of 12 Item I-K 128 Project#: SUBTT18966 DRC2014-00581, DRC2014-00645 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION X S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: 6 Engineering Services Department 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval..,have been ..completed and accepted - by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of ail improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 14. Construct the following.perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Emmett Way Curb&Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Curbside drain outlet 15. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: - Shelby Place Drive Approach Street Trees www.C'ity0fRC.US Page 6 of 12 Printed:1/12/2015 Item I-K 129 Project#: SUBTT18966 DRC2014-00581, DRC2014-00645 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION 111 S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. G. Engineering Services'Department 16. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction.project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: ® 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 17. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 18. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40 percent) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-'irrigated surfaces. 19. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. Printed:1/12/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 12 Item I-K 130 Project#: SUBTT18966 DRC2014-00581, DRC2014-00645 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION 111 SIS BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, B Ennineerina Services Dewrtment 20. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and .legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Shelby Place Botanical Name-Podocarpus henkelii Common Name-Long Leafed Yellow Wood Min. Grow Space-3' Spacing -20'O.C. Size- 15 Gallon 21. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed. into the Landscape Maintenance District:: Base Line Road Beautification Master Plan 22. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 23. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 24. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. - - -EmmettWay Botanical Name-Malaleuca linarifolia Common Name-Flaxleaf Paperbark Min. Grow Space-5' Spacing -30' O.C. Size- 15 Gallon 25. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 26. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. vwuw.CityofRC.us Page 8 or 12 Printed:1/12/2015 Item I-K 131 Project#: SUBTT18966 DRC2014-00581, DRC2014-00645 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY • Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: , Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal.Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. ROJECT.B. Engineering Services Department 27. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend. (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1);" Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Base Line Road Botanical Name-Magnolia grandiflora'Samuel Sommer' Common Name-NCN Min. Grow Space-6' Spacing -30' 0.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 28. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 29. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan: Base Line Road 30. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health. Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case.of all other residential projects. E. Grading Section 1. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by •the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. Printed:1/121201 5 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 12 Item I-K 132 Project# SUBTT18966 DRC2014-00581, DRC2014-Q0645 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 3. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste. Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 4. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water-Quality Management-Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 5. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 6. Prior.to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 7. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 8. The applicant shall prepare CC&R's as needed to clarify how maintenance responsibilities will be shared between the newly created parcels prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading and drainage plan, the final map and the CC&F;Vs shall address shared access to , private storm drains, surface drainage and storm water quality structural treatment BMP's (best management practices) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan. 9. The surface overflow drainage easement on lots lthrough 8 shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of blockage in the sump catch basin on lots 1 through 8 and provisions shall be made for overflows to pass through any walls placed across the drainage easement(s). 10. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. - 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit if a lot may not directly drain off-site directly to the street, then: a) a drainage easement shall be 'provided over the lot(s) accepting the drainage as shown on the final map; b) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and c) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. 12. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 12 Printed:1/12/2015 Item 1-1< 133 Project#: SUBTT18966 DRC2014-00581, DRC2014-00645 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 13. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 14. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 15. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 16. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 17. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho-Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. • 18. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 19. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading' permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 20. Prior to approval of the grading plan and the final project-specific water quality management plan, the Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) is required to show how ALL impervious areas will treat the storm water, this includes the proposed impervious area within the Public Right-of-Way, including but not limited to, proposed sidewalks and proposed pavement in Emmett Way. 21. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 22. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 23. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 24. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 25. The final grading and drainage. plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet • beyond project boundary. Printed:1/12/2015 wwwZtyofRC.us Page 11 of 12 Item I-K 134 Project#: SUBTT18966 DRC2014-00881, DRC2014-00645 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 26. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved.by the Building and Safety Official. 27. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit. 28. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading .operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, . the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is .not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector, b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety 'Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of* the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the. Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the'Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 29. Prior to -the issuance of the Certificate of. Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality . of the storm . water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP)devices. 30. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 31. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded..prior._to the issuance of a- grading. permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the-WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 12 Printed:1/12/2015 Item I-K 135 RESOLUTION NO. 15-09 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645, A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT EIGHT (8) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SUBDIVISION OF A VACANT PARCEL OF 1.89 ACRES OF LAND INTO EIGHT(8) LOTS WITHIN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN,AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD BETWEEN SHELBY PLACE AND EMMETT WAY, LOCATED AT 13025 BASE LINE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1100-011-02. A. Recitals. 1. Marc Homes, LLC filed an application for Development Review DRC2014-00645 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of January 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW THEREFORE it is herebyfound determined and resolved b the � Y Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. , This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 28, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant property located at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way; and - ........ b. The project site is a generally square parcel with an overall area of approximately 82,300 square feet(1.89 acre). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 270 feet(east to west) and 300 feet (north to south); and C. Immediately adjacent to the south side of the project site and to the west, on the opposite side of Emmett Way, are single-family residences (Tract 16454). To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels;on one of these parcels is a small single-family residence. To the east on the opposite side of Shelby Place, is a condominium complex (Tract 16455, Brighton Etiwanda Condominiums); and • d. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties is Low Medium(LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan; and Item I-K 136 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-09 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 2 e. The proposal is to construct eight(8)single-family residences in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966; and f. The applicant proposes two(2)types of architectural themes(elevations)—Country French and Bungalow, and six (6) footprints— Plans 1, 2, and 3 (and reverse footprints of each). Plan 1 will be one-story, while the others will be two-story. The number of available footprints will comply with Figure 5-45 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and g. One-story houses are proposed on two (2) of the eight (8) lots while two-story houses are proposed on the remainder of the lots. This equates to 25 percent of the lots having single- story houses. This mix of one-and two-story homes complies with Section 17.122.010 of the Development Code that requires that at least 25 percent of the proposed houses to be single-story;. and h. All of the houses will have two garages—one, 2-car garage and one, 1-car garage. The 2-car garages will be setback from the front part of the house,while the 1=car garages will face the side yard, i.e.,-they are side entry garages. This will comply with Section 5.42.606 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan which requires that 50 percent of the garages be oriented or situated in a manner that minimizes its visual presence (as seen from the street); and i. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. - The proposed subdivision is in accord with the General Plan and the objectives o the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan,and the purposes of the District in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct a single-family residence on each lot of an 8-lot subdivision (Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966) for a total of 8 single-family residences. The underlying General Plan designation is Low Medium Residential. b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant;the proposed land use is consistent with the land.uses withinthe.vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties_. is Low Medium (LM) Residential District., Etiwanda Specific Plan. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan,..and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Item I-K 137 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-09 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 ® Page 3 Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the . imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the staff hereby recommends the Planning Commission adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance • with the mitigation measures during project implementation. Therefore the Planning Commission adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's determination is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. .... . ........... Planning Department Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records • shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Item I-K 138 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-09 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 4 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission.mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB])daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter(PM,o)emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Item I-K 139 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-09 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 ® Page 5 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood • Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.e and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season(February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with CDFW protocols. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once thenest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a pre-construction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. 2) The tree that is removed shall be replaced with a new tree, on a one- to-one basis, of a minimum 15-gallon size. This tree is in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. Item I-K 140 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-09 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 6 Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from ...... .... demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments,using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee.. Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation - -- monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert .construction and notify the monitor of the find. Item l-K 141 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-09 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645— MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 • Page 7 • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such • episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based......-- on ased.....on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. • 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. Item I-K 142 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-09 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645-MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 8 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials° such as materials that are resource efficient,recycled,and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including,but not limited to, any combination of: Increased insulation, Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, 0 Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor.lighting.._ 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver- and- usereclaimed water. - Design,buildings to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low-flow faucets, dual flush toilets, and waterless urinalstwater heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. Item I-K 143 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-09 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 • Page 9 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a • remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris.or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by IW Consulting Engineers, Inc. in June 2014 to reduce pollutants, during and after construction, entering the storm drain..system.to the maximum extent practical. Post-Construction Operational: 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by IW consulting Engineers, Inc.in June 2014 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped • areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be Item I-K 144 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-09 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645-MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 10 submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a . project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment-adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. - -- 9) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Windows: All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well-fitted,well weather-stripped assemblies, and shall have a minimum STC of 27. Air gaps and rattling shall not be permitted. The total area of glass shall not exceed 20% of the floor area in any room. 2) Doors: All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least 1.75 inches thick. 3) Roof: Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well-fitted or caulked plywood of at least.5 inches thickness. Ceilings shall be well- fitted, well-sealed gypsum board of at least 0.50 inch thickness. Insulation with at least a rating of R-19 shall be used ih the attic space. _ . .._.. . 4) Ventilation: Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when. the room is in use. A forced air circulation system (e.g. air conditioning) shall be provided which satisfies the requirement of the Uniform Mechanical Code. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. Item I-K 145 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-09 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645— MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 ® Page 11 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050,as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips(counting both to and from the ® construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on.the 28th day of January 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: Item I-K 146 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-09 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645—MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 12 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item I-K 147 Conditions of Approval RANCHO CommunityDevelopment Department Project#: DRC2014-00645 CEQA2014-00022 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 1. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development ode and/or . This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.. 5. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 6. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in, a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD) Standards. 7. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 8. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations,. exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan • Printed:1/15/2015 www.QtyofRC.us Item I-K 148 Project#: DRC2014-00645 CEQA2014-00022 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION NI S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 9. Approval is for the, development of 8 single-family residences in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966, an 8-lot subdivision of about 1.89 acres within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda- Specific Plan, at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way located at 13025 Base Line Road-APN: 1100-011-02. 10. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior 'final map approval' in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire.Construction Services. 11. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 12. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department -to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 13. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in- the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 14. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 15. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail; all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. . .. . ..... ... .. 16.. . For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. 17. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 18. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 19. Approval of this application is contingent on the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966. www.CityotRC.us Page 2 of 14 Printed:1/1512016 Item I-K 149 Project#: DRC2014-00645 CEQA2014-00022 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION ///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Wroject Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 20. Model homes shall require the review of a separate Temporary Use Permit (Model Home) and fee prior to the submittal of documents for plan check and construction. Note: Parking in the street will not be permitted for this purpose. A temporary off-street parking area that complies with all applicable parking requirements will be required and must be shown on the plans for this permit. 21. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting., The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 22. The molding along the top of the stone veneer wainscots shall be stone and not foam. 23. All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581 shall apply. 24. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion 0control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be nstalled by the developer prior to occupancy. 25. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 26. All walls shall• be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 27. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water - efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. .28. Development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Low Medium(LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. 29. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for •City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. Printed:1/15/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 14 . Item I-K 150 Project#: DRC2014-00645 CEQA2014-00022 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION N S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY. TO.YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 30. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 31. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and. sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees: Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the( property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning.Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 32. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 33. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 34. Copies of the. signed. Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 35. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to _the Clerk of the. Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 36. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. B Enaineerina Services Department www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 14 Printed:1115/2015 Item I-K 151 Project#: DRC2014-00645 CEQA2014-00022 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Oroject Type: Design Review CEQA Review -ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY.TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 1. Emmett Way frontage improvements to be in accordance with the City "Local' standards and the Etiwanda Specific Plan standards as required and including: a. Provide curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, sidewalk and street trees per City Street Tree Requirement Form, as requited. b. Proposed drive approaches to be in accordance with City Driveway Policy. c. Provide 5800 lumens HPSV-equivalent LED street lights, as required. d. Provide traffic signing and striping, as required. e. Curbside drain outlet shall conform to City Std. 107-B or 107-C. Private HOA-maintained storm drain shall be approved by Building and Safety Division. 2. Base Line Road frontage improvements to be in accordance with the City "Major Divided" and the Etiwanda Specific Plan standards as required and including: 1101. Protect existing curb, gutter, access ramps and street lights, as required. b. Remove existing sidewalk and construct curvilinear sidewalk, as required. c. Protect or modify existing traffic signing and striping, as required. 3. Tract 18806 has undergrounded existing overhead utilities -along the north side of Base Line Road. The developer of Tract 18806 is eligible for reimbursement to recover the proportionate cost of the undergrounding. The fair share amount has been determined per Reimbursement Agreement City File URA-31 dated December 19, 2012, which shall be paid prior to approval of the final map or building permit issuance, whichever occurs first. Said fair amount is $16,830.00 is based on City current fee which is subject to verification of annual increase, together with interest from the date of the agreement to be based on current ENR (Engineering News Record) City Cost Index rate (Los Angeles). ... .......---.,.-- Printed:1115/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 14 Item I-K 152 Project#: DRC2014-00645 CEQA2014-00022 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION IN SIS BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA.Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B Enaineerina Services Delpartment 4. Shelby Place frontage improvements to be in accordance with the City "Collector" standards and the Etiwanda Specific Plan standards as required and including: a. Protect existing curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lights, as required. b. All driveways shall have circular driveways or hammerheads so that vehicles do not have to back out. Northern most drive approach shall be a minimum of 88 feet from projection of BCR to the nearest edge of driveway. c Provide street trees per City Street Tree Requirement Form. d. Protect or repair existing signing and striping, as required e. Provide restrictions to keep the line of sight clear for a vehicle backing out of the northern most driveway on comer Lot 5, such as red curb and a no-building easement. f. Provide a disclosure stating that attempting to go northbound from the comer lot may be. difficult due to potential stacking for the traffic signal on Shelby Place. 5. .The developer shall request that the City appropriately process a vacation of the City excess 10-foot right-of-way on Emmett Way. Said vacation of right-of-way shall be incorporated into the development. 6. Install Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) improvements along project frontage on Base Line Road: a. Improvements including street trees shall conform to the Base Line Road Beautification Master Plan and be consistent with the existing improvements to the west (Tract 16454-1) of this development. b. An additional 11-foot wide maximum shall be dedicated to the City as Lot "A" on the map for landscape purposes. c. The maximum slope within publicly maintained landscape areas shall be 3:1. Where slopes occur, a 1-foot flat area behind the sidewalk shall be provided. Slopes higher than 6 feet shall have a 2-foot wide flat shelf at the top, along the base of the walls. d. Keep the line of sight clear between eastbound traffic on Base Line Road turning right onto Shelby Place and vehicles exiting the driveway on corner Lot 5. e. Private perimeter walls shall not extend further than a projection of fronts of adjacent houses on corner Lots 1 and 5. In the case of Lot 5, lines of sight shall govern. Provide a mow strip to separate public/private maintenance. www.QtyofRC.us — _ Page 6 of 14 Printed:1/15/2015 Item I-K 153 Project#: DRC2014-00645 CEQA2014-00022 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Wroject Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 7. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted 'from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department.. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 10. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source Iof energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for nrhich a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than . one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 11. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 12. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Emmett Way Curb& Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Appr.loach Street Lights Street Trees Printed:1/15/2015 www.QtyofRC.us Page 7 of 14 Item I-K 154 Project#: DRC2014-00645 CEQA2014-00022 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION ///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B Engineering Services Department 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffid signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3-feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. . e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times- with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash eposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of Building-.- Permits, whichever occurs - first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District:: Base Line Road Beautification Master Plan 15. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40 percent) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. 16. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan: Base Line Road 17. Provide separate utility services to each paircel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. www.0tyofRC.us Page 8 of 14 Printed:1/15/2015 Item I-K 155 Project#: DRC2014-00645 CEQA2014-00022 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION N S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY *ocation: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 roject Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 18. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 19. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including .driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 20. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 21. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 22. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed &gend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Emmett Way Botanical Name- Malaleuca linarifolia Common Name- Flaxleaf Paperbark Min. Grow Space- 3' Spacing- 30' 0.C. Size- 15 Gallon 23. Street...trees, _.a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 24. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. us Printed:1/15/2015 www.QtyofRC. Page 9 of 14 Item I-K 156 Project#: DRC2014-00645 CEQA2014-00022 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B Enaineerina Services Department 25. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans.- Base lans.Base Line Road Botanical Name-Magnolia grandiflora'Samuel Sommer Common Name- NCN Min. Grow Space-6' Spacing - 30' O.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 26. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name-Shelby Place Botanical..Name- Podocarpus henkelii Common Name-Long Leafed Yellow Wood Min. Grow Space 3' Spacing- 30' O.C. Size- 15 Gallon 27. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 28. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. www.QtyofRC.us Page 10 of 14 Printed:1115/2015 Item I-K 157 Project#: DRC2014-00645 CEQA2014-00022 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION 111 S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Wroject Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 29. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Base Line Road Curvilinear Sidewalk Street Trees 30. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Shelby Place Drive Approach Street Trees E. Grading Section 1. Prior to. the issuance of a Grading Permit the. City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. WPrior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall. obtain a Waste Discharge Identification umber(WDID). 3. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 4. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP°s) as described in the Storm Water Quality. Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 5. If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the applicant shall provide a copy of_ EPA_.Form 7520-16 (inventory. of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 6. Reciprocal access easements. for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall -be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, -on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the .7. roperty boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). us Printed:1/15/2015 www.CityofRC. Page 11 of 14 Item I-K 158 Project#: DRC2014-00646 CEQA2014-00022 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 8. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 9. The applicant shall prepare or amend existing CC&R's as needed to clarify how maintenance responsibilities will be shared between the newly created parcels and the remaining existing parcels of Parcel Map prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading and drainage plan and the CC&Rs shall address shared access to Street, private storm drains, surface drainage and maintenance of common areas, including landscaping within public rights-of-way and BMPs identified in the WQMP. 10. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 11. Prior to the .issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 12. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan"shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 13. Grading of the subject property shall. be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 14. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 15. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 16. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and. Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 17. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 18. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 14 Printed:1/15/2015 Item I-K 159 Project#: DRC2014-00645 CEQA2014-00022 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY 46ocation: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 roject Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 19. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 20. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building--and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed- by the Engineer of Record. 21. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line, 22. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 23. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 24. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho a-ucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 25. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the. Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall. certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 27. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. • Printed:1/15/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 14 Item I-K 160 Project#: DRC2014-00645 CEQA2014-00022 Project Name: 8 LOT SUBDIVISION 111 S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+SHELBY Location: 13025 BASE LINE RD- 110001102-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 28: Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all' storm water. quality structural/treatment . best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included--in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of-the- Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. - www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 14 . Printed:1/15/2015 - Item I-K 161 • RESOLUTION NO. 15-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00581, A REQUEST TO REMOVE TREES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 8-LOT SUBDIVISION OF A VACANT PARCEL OF ABOUT 1.89 ACRE WITHIN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN,AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD BETWEEN SHELBY PLACE AND EMMETT WAY, LOCATED AT 13025 BASE LINE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1100-011-02. A. Recitals. 1. Marc Homes, LLC filed an application for Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of January 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 28, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant property located at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way; and b. The project site is a generally square parcel with an overall area of approximately 82,300 square feet(1.89 acre). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 270 feet(east to west) and 300 feet (north to south); and C. Immediately adjacent to the south side of the project site and to the west, on the opposite side of Emmett Way, are single-family residences (Tract 16454). To the north, on the opposite side of Base Line Road, is a largely undeveloped set of parcels;on one of these parcels is a small single-family residence. To the east, on the opposite side of Shelby.. Place, is a condominium complex (Tract 16455, Brighton Etiwanda Condominiums); and • d. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties is Low Medium(LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan; and Item I-K 162 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-10 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00581 —MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 2 e. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18996 and Development Review DRC2014-00645; and f. The proposed project includes.the removal of nine(9)trees that are located along the north side of the project site. The applicant submitted a Tree Inventory Arborist Report, prepared by Ryan Wagner on May 13, 2014, that included the description and health of the individual trees and their overall health and condition. The survey identified only one (1) of these trees.as"heritage"trees which are subject to the City's tree preservation requirements as described in Section 17.80.050 of the Development Code; and g. It is necessary tolemove the trees in order to grade the site and construct future single-family residences and associated improvements,which will allow economic enjoyment of the property; and h. There are a numerous trees within the surrounding residential neighborhoods to the east,south, and west. The removal does not affect the established character of the area on the property values; and i. The trees cannot be preserved by pruning and proper maintenance or relocation rather than removal; and j.. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource of the City. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and C. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or- welfare,-.or. materially. injurious to properties or. improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: -Item I-K 163 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-10 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00581 —MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 3 a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. . Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. • d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's determination is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909)477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition attached. 6. . The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF--THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary • Item I-K 164 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-10 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00581 -MARC HOMES, LLC January 28, 2015 Page 4 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:.. COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item I-K 165' - Conditions of Approval J!, Cxn Community Development Department CA OONGA Project#: DRC2014-00581 Project Name: TRP FOR 8 LOT SUBDIVISION ///S/S BASE LINE, EMMETT+ SHELBY Location: - Project Type: Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. Approval is for the removal of nine (9) trees, including one (1) "heritage" tree in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645, a proposed 8-lot subdivision of a vacant parcel of about 1.89 acre in the 'Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way located at 13025 Base Line Road; APN: 1100-011-02. 2. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 3. The "heritage" tree that is removed shall be replaced with a new tree of a minimum 15-gallon size. This tree is in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential Development. 4. All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645 shall apply. 5. The applicant shall agree to. defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 7. Approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581 is contingent--upon the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645. www.QtyofRC.us Panted:1/15/2015 Item I-K 166 R r STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: January 28, 2015 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00567 — TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESMENTS - A proposal to amend the Development Code to permit the construction of buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet on select parcels located within the Industrial Park (IP) District. Related files: Development Review DRC2014-00566 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL.ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566 — TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESMENTS: A proposal to construct an industrial building of about 116,480 square feet on a parcel of about 249,000 square feet (5.72 acres) in • the Industrial Park (IP) District located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue; APN: 0210-0371-02. Related files: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00845—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESMENTS —A request to remove trees in conjunction with the construction of an industrial building of about 116,480 square feet on a parcel of about 249,000 square feet (5.72 acres) in the Industrial Park (IP) District located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue; APN: 0210-0371-02. Related files: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: • Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project and recommend that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Development Code DRC2014-00567; • Adopt the attached Resolution recommending that the City Council approve Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567; • Adopt the Resolutions approving Development Review DRC2014-00566 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION • A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Industrial Office Buildings; Industrial Park (IP) District South - Apartment Complex; Urban Residential — Ontario Center Specific Plan (City of Ontario) Item L-N 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00566, DRC2014-00567, AND DRC2014-00845—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 2 East - Vacant (part) and Industrial Building (part); Industrial Park (IP) District West - Vacant; Industrial Park (IP) District B. General Plan Designations: Project Site— Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - Medium Density Residential (City of Ontario) East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a property located on the north side of 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue (Exhibit B). The property has an area of about 249,000 square feet (5:72 acres) and is about 415 feet (east-west) by about 601 feet (north-south). The western two-thirds of the property was previously developed with a two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 22,500 square feet, and associated site improvements such as asphalt storage/parking areas, landscaping (ground cover) and numerous mature trees along 4th Street and along the perimeter. The City's records are incomplete regarding these buildings but based on the information that is available, these buildings were most likely constructed in the late 1970's or early 1980's. Within the last few years there has been ongoing deconstruction/demolition activity on the property and, therefore, only the.smaller of the two buildings, the paving, and the landscaping remain. The eastern one-third of parcel is vacant and is dominated by short grasses. Development of the site for the subject project will result in the removal of all the identified improvements. The project site is bound on the north by industrial office buildings. To the east is.a property that is partially developed with a building of about 13,000 square feet. To the west is a vacant property while to the south, on the opposite side of 4th Street, is an apartment complex (Centre Club Apartments) in the City of Ontario. The zoning of the property and all properties to the north, east, and west is Industrial Park (IP) District. The zoning of the property to the south, in the City of Ontario, is Urban Residential —Ontario Center Speck Plan. The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1,041 feet and 1,030 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: A. General: .The applicant.proposes to construct a logistics building of about 116,480 square feet (Exhibit D). The building is speculative at this time. As the building is in excess of 50,000 square feet, activities within this building would be classified as Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Medium." However, as this level of wholesale, storage, and distribution is not permitted in the Industrial Park (IP) District at this time, the applicant has submitted an application to amend the Development Code (Related file: DRC2014-00567) to allow it. Typical for this type of building, there will be a relatively small office area relative to the overall size of the building. This office area will be located at the southeast comer of the building. The dock loading/storage area with 18 dock doors will be located on the east side of the building (Exhibit F). There will be two points of access— one via an existing driveway and another via a new driveway at the southwest and southeast comers, respectively, of the project site. The existing driveway at the midpoint of the site's street frontage will be demolished. The building is required to have 76 passenger vehicle parking stalls; 76 parking stalls are provided. Landscape coverage is 15 percent; the minimum requirement is 15 percent for this Development District. Item L-N 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00566, DRC2014-00567, AND DRC2014-00845—TURNER REAL ESTATE • INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 3 The proposed building will be of concrete tilt-up construction painted with a palette of two colors (blue and shades of grey). The building will have sandblasted concrete accents. An additional primary material will be metal accents while a secondary material will be glass panels. Generous amounts of blue-tinted glass have been provided at the office area and at various locations along the wall planes of the building. A key feature is glass that is applied almost to the full height of the office corner that gives it the appearance of a glass "'cube." Another feature are the horizontally articulated vertical elements located at intermediate points along the primary wall planes that interrupt the wall plane. These vertical elements include glass panels. At the office corner, there are also horizontal metal accents that project from the wall plane. These accents punctuate the application of glass and provide shaded relief. On the East Elevation, there are a couple of vertical design elements that minimize the expanse of plain, bare walls in the dock area. Lastly, all corners, with the exception of the northeast comer, are enhanced by utilizing different shades of grey, metal canopies, score lines, and relief in the wall plane that,,altogether, reflect the general appearance of the office corner (Exhibits H and 1). B. Floor Area Analysis: Per Chapter 2, Figure LU-2 Land Use Plan of the General Plan, the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) in the Industrial Park (IP) land use category is 60 percent. As the proposed building will have a floor area of 116,480 square feet and the project site has an area of approximately 249,316 square feet, the calculated FAR for the project will be approximately 46.7 percent. • C. Parking Calculations: Per Table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code, the parking calculations for the proposed project, based on the proposed mix of office, warehouse, and manufacturing floor areas in the building, are as follows: Type of Use Floor Area Parking Number of Spaces (Square Feet Ratio Required Proposed Building (overall) 116,480 Warehousing 109,480 varies' 48 Office 7,000 1/250 28 Total Required/Total Provided 76/762 'For warehouse uses, the parking calculations are 1 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 20,000 square feet; 1 space per 2,000 square feet for the second 20,000 square feet; and 1 space per 4,000 square feet for additional floor area in excess of the first 40,000 square feet. 2The trailer parking requirement is calculated separately from the standard parking requirement and is based on a ratio of one stall per dock door. The number of trailer parking spaces that is required and provided is 18 spaces. D. Technical Review Committee: The proposed project was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee on November 18, 2014. The Committee accepted the proposal and recommend approval. The Committees' conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. E. Desiqn Review Committee: The proposed project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) on November 18, 2014, (Exhibit Q. The Committee accepted the proposal, subject to the revisions recommended in the Comments Item L-N 3 P PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT D.RC2014-00566, DRC2014-00567, AND DRC2014-00845—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 4 prepared by Staff, and recommend approval. The Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. F. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567: The project is for a logistics building of about 116,480 square feet. As.the building has a floor area that is in excess of 50,000 square feet, activities within a building of the proposed size are classified as "Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Medium" per Section 17.32.020 —Allowed Use Descriptions —.of the Development Code (Exhibit M). The Industrial Park (IP) District is described in Table 17.26.020-1 for the Development Code as follows: Designate[d] areas for industrial firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment and a location which has prestige value. The district allows light industrial uses, office and administration facilities, research and development laboratories, and limited types of warehousing, as well as support businesses and commercial service uses. The Development Code currently does not permit "Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Medium", and the corresponding buildings for such uses, in the Industrial Park (IP) Districts (hereon referred to as the "subject District") [Exhibit N]). In the subject District, the Code does permit "Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Light"; however, the corresponding buildings for such uses are limited to less than 50,000 square feet in floor area. Aside from the floor area 'limit', there is no significant difference between the "Light" and "Medium" classes of Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution. In order to maximize the development opportunity of the project site, the applicant has submitted a Development Code Amendment to allow "Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Medium" which, if approved, would permit the construction and operation of the proposed logistics building. The Industrial Park (IP) Districts are generally located between Foothill Boulevard, Rochester Avenue/Interstate 15, Hermosa Avenue, and 4th Street. The section of the Code that will be amended is Table 17.30.030-1 and will read as shown in Exhibit O. The amendment will not change any of the technical standards (floor area ratio, building setbacks, parking requirements, landscape coverage, etc.), design standards (architecture, site design, etc.), allowable land uses (except for allowing "Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Medium" in the Industrial Park (IP) District), and/or performance standards (noise, odors, hazardous materials,. etc.) that currently apply within the subject District.. The . .... .. _ performance standards that apply to the Industrial Park (IP) Districts are the most restrictive of the performance standards that apply to the industrial districts. The proposed amendment will apply to all parcels within the subject District (Exhibit Q). However, due to technical restraints, Code requirements, and/or previously approved or pending entitlements, the amendment will only have a practical effect on a limited number of parcels. The amendment does not supersede the restrictions that apply within the Haven Avenue Overlay District and Staff has proposed a restriction that prohibits "Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution—Medium" within 500 feet of Foothill Boulevard (see explanation below). Per the General Plan and Development Code, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) permitted in the subject District is 60 percent. In order to construct a building of 50,000 square feet or more and still comply with the maximum floor area ratio, the minimum parcel size upon which such a building could be built is 83,333 square feet (0.60 x 83,333 = 50,000). Item L-N 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00566, DRC2014-00567, AND DRC2014-00845—TURNER REAL ESTATE • INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page.5 Status of Parcel Number of Parcels Located within the Industrial Park (IP) District) 557 Area Equal to or Greater than 83,333 Square Feet 557—430 = 127 Have the Potential for Development 127—93 = 34 Not within the Haven Avenue Overlay District 34— 11 = 23 Available for a Building of 50,000+ Square Feet in Floor Area 23 As shown in the table above, of the 557 parcels that are within the subject District, only 127 parcels have an area of 83,333 square feet or more (four of these parcels are less than that size but could be combined with a contiguous parcel to make them larger). Of that number, only 34 parcels have the potential for development, i.e., they are vacant, underutilized, or due to the age of the existing development on the property, may be redeveloped within the next few years. As Warehouse, Storage, and Distribution uses/buildings of any type and size are not permitted within the Haven Avenue Overlay District per Table 17.38.040 of the Development Code (Exhibit P), the number of parcels that could be developed is reduced further to 23 parcels. tFoothill Boulevard is a major east-west corridor through the City. Although the City's goals for Foothill Boulevard differ from the goals for Haven Avenue, its significance to the City is similar as it serves as a vital commercial (and to a lesser extent, residential) corridor with numerous existing and planned nodes/areas of activity, aesthetic and architectural standards and themes, and traffic circulation patterns/types. None of these are compatible with the activity, mass and bulk the buildings, and/or heavy truck traffic associated with logistics buildings. In order to ensure that the Foothill Boulevard corridor is "protected," staff has incorporated into the proposed amended Table 17.30.030-1 the following footnote (which will be Note #12 in the Table): "Warehouse, Storage, and Distribution - Medium" is not permitted on any parcel that is located within, or partly within, 500 feet of the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. Staff notes to the Commission with this additional restriction incorporated into the Development Code, only 17 parcels could be developed with a logistics building of 50,000 square feet or more due to the subject Development Code Amendment. As part of this amendment, the footnote reference (#9) in the row that applies to "Warehouse, Storage, and Distribution — Medium" in Table 17.30.030-1 is being deleted. The cited footnote prohibits several land uses within 300 feet of a residentially zoned district (as stated in Note #9 beneath the subject Table).The footnote itself will remain as there is another use, "Medium Manufacturing" that is prohibited within 300 feet of a residentially zoned district. The restriction against "Warehouse, Storage, and Distribution — Medium" within 300 feet of a residentially • zoned district is being deleted as there is no practical purpose to this restriction. One of the most significant impacts that logistics activities could have on residential development due to proximity is noise caused by activity in the loading docks. Most activity related to logistics are Item L-N 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF-REPORT DRC2014-00566, DRC2014-00567, AND DRC2014-00845—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 6 conducted indoors regardless of the size of the building. Furthermore, noise generated in the dock areas is usually attenuated by either the building itself and/or by on-site screen walls. Specific to the proposed project, there is residentially zoned property to the south of the project site that is improved with an apartment complex in the City of Ontario. The dock area for the proposed building is oriented towards the east (as opposed to towards the street), will be screened behind the bulk of the building and a screen wall, and Per the Noise Study that was prepared by MIGIHogle-Ireland in April 2014 on behalf of the applicant: ...the increase in traffic generated noise will only beperceptible to the community if traffic levels double on any roadway. The proposed project will not double traffic on any of the surrounding roadways. Therefore,-the project-related noise increases on 4th Street will not be perceptible and impacts will be less than significant. Traffic is another significant impact that logistics activities could have on residential development due to,trucks travelling to and from the project site. Specific to the proposed project, there will be two (2) driveways providing access to the project site. The site is separated from the residential development to the south by a raised, landscaped median. As traffic generated by the project will take the most direct route to major highways, it is unlikely there will be a direct traffic impact on the residences to the south. As there are no openings in the median to allow left turn movements, traffic to and from the project site will be limited to the north side of 411 Street. Per the Traffic Impact Assessment prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan on April 29, 2014 on behalf of the applicant: Using the "100 trip threshold" criteria as indicated in the SANBAG Congestion Management Program (CMP) as the basis for requiring the preparation of a traffic impact analysis, the proposed Project would not require the preparation of a traffic impact analysis or comprehensive traffic impact assessment. As a result, based on the traffic generation potential of the proposed 4th Street Industrial Project, the proposed maximum 120,000 SF warehouse building will not significantly impact the surrounding transportation system. Staff notes to the Commission that the adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any future project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts and conducting a thorough analysis of the environmental impacts as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). When the applications for future projects-are submitted for- review by the City, the impact (if any) due to, for example, noise, caused-by future projects will. be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. G. Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845: The proposed project includes the removal of five (5) trees that are located at the south side of the project site. The applicant submitted a Tree Survey, prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland on August 27, 2014, that included the description and health of the individual trees and their overall health and condition. The survey identified only one (1) of these trees as „heritage trees which are subject to the City's tree preservation requirements as described in Section 17.80.050 of the Development Code. As it is necessary to remove the heritage tree in order to grade the site and construct the proposed building and associated improvements which will allow.economic enjoyment of the property, the applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit. The.proposed project will be required to include the planting of a new tree to replace the heritage tree that is removed. This replacement tree will be Item L-N 6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00566, DRC2014-00567, AND DRC2014-00845—TURNER REAL ESTATE ® INVESTMENTS .January 28, 2015 Page 7 in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new industrial development. H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to, for example, air quality (including greenhouse gases), biological resources, hydrology/water quality, and noise there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. Respectfully su itted, isCEJ v� CandyceBum Planning Director CB:MS/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit F - Floor Plan Exhibit G - Roof Plan and Building Sections Exhibit H - Building Elevations and Enlarged Elevation of the South Elevation Exhibit I - Colored Elevations Exhibit J - Details for the Outdoor Eating Area, Trash Enclosure, Screen Wall, etc. Exhibit K - Landscape Plan Exhibit L - Design Review Committee Action Comments (November 18, 2014) Exhibit M - Section 17.32.020 -Allowed Use Descriptions (excerpt) Exhibit N - Table 17.30.030-1 (excerpt) — Allowed Land Uses...Base Zoning District (excerpt) Exhibit O - Table 17.30.030-1 (excerpt) with Amendments Exhibit P - Table 17.38.040-1 — Allowed Land Uses...Haven Avenue Overlay • Zoning District Exhibit Q - Analysis of the Parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts Exhibit R - Initial Study Parts I, II, and III Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2014-00566 Item L-N 7 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00566, DRC2014-00567, AND DRC2014-00845—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 8 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845 Item L-N 8 '-:FABS: xlrul•xo_AVE�. _ � � *" ., ^, �, s r uvzauu wm xmla� �p S • �•1L� 4 � �`x ��-, `yrs / t � ��Cfg auruGwa Saxxsxa • `aa z aura x a mwffr '% t F/re °I - \ G f G SfalP M/6 s snalnvela e s L,L �''_ If- A g.e 3k ii 19TH STGALL, RIAW- 30� pvF xowc5i p r 3PA�'34� $�!Ny"�I r "A I—�rl-uaw A C, xx mi � �a; - ON wG1+xIL;.2 fl r mom- � ewwmr� g G $ i-IlyG W:°oxx�CT a„-.uY�kG2i, wim[n remit s -U-2: --IIt=L d§J,a=5t .S wwluiw IL�T sr Iwv I L,JI 4 &I S"y�Y."wMr a e A zFwuexCiP E rarorcsmsn t c9 v19445s o t� .a` �LY� iV2i NPII sr S a uwvx+ert 7!. ,hGun•rla 3 a C+ <. 1 � _ gg $g SL: rf " _yf4R Puxxrvlsu uvdMxr u�a L e xtx -�(+�.v1�79�IILsr nz- �°, I(" '_a G hto9lEvlsra tl. V plMwir Lj�! g, ., �Gr: 'u�Iassr, IV > G g CARNELIAN 11 % f I D W" t f r ALTA SII %a' gel n ox e4�"0 n �l.�'`i°Yien / Nre I' tl Qixna� LOMA dar� �_ I �I; 3! s��sieoyT.a.'`� � �a A99EBB6r tilL s ��a�aj— oxwx �' `,mnn —• E s �-'CI ' "-''°v BASE LINE nsw RO %� mu"'n� ec�x gg r n c sxln c N 5 x L s a#F,w, LIGR < xaa °nuw°nsI_ C !. G @R I �Y✓P^�,��s.= 49 �._ �ic. wlra 3 ab>.aJGar s c ` fn "'-u I�Q axao. 5 PAID. JALM IN Y_ LuyA aGr PaLUN _ • 3., p;�/vNs2e�� `I w_J \p� ° •E n � ' � TV a E CI M�GAr y t= vyxar n RUryI W19C11SL s � •ix° It s �sl �£ I 1 �-= AVS IT V al sxow.v —L'Lwsild AV2511% AyP .. ..: _ nuusLl r' 1 '£.' va ZT BIflLX 51 §§�� Y a� y� 1 1 r(PO �yW N: I \ acoNY(N!T. O ..�� 4 'M w _mak C. ''.nmxFL� Y ¢A' ✓. ivF" sPIGLs ��' \ '.�^ �\ OAY.M.C. Me sr r mux- _ FAMILY JI Go I ' I © J ` �— TERRA VISTA \ sPORrsaa Sfunon2 E � TOWN CENTER��— Ds CENTER2 54REG1 SFdfacuc i§� 1� N h NI6TOFIC 1 FOOTHILL BLr� I! 1' " 66 ,I i. n I 'y I' IlNE6125tl1 �j g� Ii .NNfI�£ir 1 i0U5E �yyyPyGl \ , I. IMELiNNY r �I G CITY .� x fC / 1,4 6- . � IG'L � •,� 1` § 3,y�L .ALL POLICE'A 1 HERBAGE\1 /! ra,uxLd GULCH s f� b �`� �� ` < Gl- STATIO HOSPITAL IL r1 Jl , r GUAR N 5_ `-�! OxFMY[; xxx9CII6P a __c 3 ,�exra � ifl �i y liaax�w ��,� $$ �n la' I ,xmrzxlwn N•ESYCpEM1 'ER I l Jul I i «Ix =rre'ft sg 3r f W a Izn a e am,,TI a w > seavAmrwr � Q r-`-- . 1 �41w+� I�'�0.GP Z ¢'flRTwCf �9PLEr •�. PROJECT SITE `� • "O ;RANCH I__JEBSEY9LVD_._ • C- RGA �`- EI. =-�i I -re •.,ifeHOn Q m_. •uxmt YE 4i I ' II I METROLINKTRAIN ;I S BTH ST .. _ YNY I, TM BMRW �a ' n. Alf 4 �@6M4tlL I _ GOLF STH :[isx"rw�a rm°vesm�.cM ;•. s ��� I � LA�pE E - 15 j _ � sr :sxa_avav r ST �i COURS4d ' ewoxRA �.� GII db�F G G•.��s" -_,.� I. � 1 S I = � 'I 4 7au i_:bul•A,�`\e .Ym�i'1Gu"'a3 <1 3' Jflgp,uax wry_ ��efiF1�:r 1 .. IT f � I%tm ATH ST G EXHIBIT A �° . � 9 i - • • • s - ` • i ' 1 � 11 M7 hoMA*IS' air l a II ♦ A a �a11A�� `� :�1F�ill7 Ai:�t11a i � `°' iiluvli ,l.r�sF��!: s l; ProW t' k It11�0�1�11�1�IW1ilydrll�iY�llr1 � - - I �R�11� 1 717 f— - -. fl -4 IRN A , SII r _ �� ' (6 k ti •ate T • •' Sl. , 1 a � , �_.... ..• .til . r � , w Efiir •mo-° • �: 0 t" t� �� � � I II II III�IIIIIIIOIIIIVi{ 1N IIII •�" ' U-210—07246� .. :.. . . ' ONE:GENERAL TRADEMARK STREET Lao NDUStR1Alrum mom-- •`f P.M.NO.57 6' . s - P.M.NO.1 -5 mei INtlU$T m ZONE:INDUSTRIAL - 6bo � _. . •_ - -. ENTERPRISE STREET I F PM.N0.52n0 . . INUUs'1�A, 6 L - - c • 00 _ ADTe INDUSTRIAL PARK j COMMERCE T :. vQ OCQ�o�ZP TAN 52 10 9 T _ QENTER DRIVE w- P.M.NO.62/10 ONE`.' IP LIMIT CI OF_ -- 6 IAL PARK s I 1 ZONE:INDUSTRIAL PARK RANCHCWGA < i - 4TH / .i - -t STREET • 'a . r. . CEXISTING / LI IT CITY OF `-- -- - rULVERT tt ONTARIO fD z i er rr ..� w M.B.NO.22M 10 y`� .• M.B.N0.241/8.8 f° ZONE S -'I v z • PROPERTY OWNER SHEETTDEX I j TY ADDRESS. MCxRCI1WOt•• IAv` pIRINn Bllwb FItRNYIi BK➢No DOBNMi RRaMJ i ADDRESS OP THE PROPER 2 /SGESS_S„,R, €4 „� OR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0000010 •_' wmm cm _nJ+L / LEGAL DESCRIPTION a o PROJECT DATA � w 1 APPLICANT ear. i APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE —T —�-- - - SITE PLAN KEYNOTES R 'i O= Fl Reul Male lmml,n.ny �. 41h Shet 80 SF - e g-Q......- Building l ma°= RANCHO ! r S - o O, ---'•—'-' CUCAMONGA d I�I' IIII g ®aara4,. �,�xrsa L__— SUE PLAN GENERAL NOTES SNE LEGEND CDnsulUn6: i f I I I 's It 3 ® R Yr"41 - w,.-.... ps «...Fl er a.o - - — ,�'�. � e — A i _•'_Fl m s-•--" ��...�_.., maw VICINUYMAP UINRes EE � i a ¢ 4'�- F �; i�p a 1,_ 4� �iEg _ �g 1io ;; �H�T��• a Fl. LT TXEEYs 11s1 9133815 H16 Proled lnlwmaRomBuldln Dela ummcmn.r. _ �S �Y H S C zaxw wuslMlcTON mE ave,mwux..em.,. -rr- PYae4 e91 Lees a OCGWNAY I gV6MPTL PIPE SRVMIEIi 1 1 . OYERILL BITE PLAN /.l �,r, ® �.wfa[nnPA v - i v m x CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN PARCEL 1 OF PM 5239 MB 52/10 a 0 4 d ; ! I REO NG DF:SI RV Y 43123 APN: 0210-371-02 ' la _ A➢" Of WDUO PARR IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11��77 ZO U3TR T' I COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO yOWIT6NP A➢M 02�8T1-03 1 Q \ c' ( 1EG�I.CESCRI➢!roN ft0002W1E -^ �� • ZDNEI` U TRIAL FAWN 1 ... :.t:.v: - Y.: ,;^: . . ,C➢OGF6PRIC SUFYEY I �•.. _. - �. ,..- . .:.., - - r� ':. FRD➢ERIYOWN6WEYELP°ER 8191BOF96VWIG9 - �,. ii,�•,N � — — ••n-V EarnalmEwnmwixauwrnr.' I� .,...n, ^^y. I I —I J a a' w ➢.M M6.IAP,68-68 3 'I J 'I ➢ozo- 1 Zo WWEMAL PARK _ I\I AAAPPPA ozlo-aTTTV1}62 ---- --^ � I h _ � + _# I — ➢ c2se.M.e.barb• � _ i �— � Z r WOUSYI , 69p a I` ® I 116 U1 I �_ S e •� ,� v, i� m°�,,,^' B }• ,: tR._ of ; /I ✓ B x2 gECT1ON EXISTING FOURTHSTREET — F. W y SITESECRGNA.A 171 w i III aPw 02 37PM. D ti ; ,,,• 1 M P.M.6288,M.B.62110 {w.) ZONA WDUSTRU PARI( y SITE SECTION BA ..... CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN I 1 FUSCOE PARCEL I nmaR wu emrz W ;A uRtaems OF O V8 MB 52/10 AVN ozpanaz IN THE CITY OF COUNrvOF RANCHO OXAMOA G 0 XKEYNOTES-FLOOR PLAN �uo'irta�wa�m a r wR — - T - - t _ o p Y Ama°s^ .w aAu°F�♦'A'(nr k�ia�i namN 1 I I O,"aR — � t L _ h � _ y GENERAL NOTES-FLOOR PLAN BUILDING 1w >< . .,mow. ,..,�.n. FLo ■ a 116,480 S.F. mn.¢ _ 4ms��aa 0 YG, __ Intlusldal Building R — — — • RANCHO CUCAMONGA z ^h II ah T MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE T r®n nM[ m .....w..,.n. Consulmnu: !2_ 22V _ 2212 — 111' ___ LESS THAN 40 PER CBC 10 3,— a p _ 8 TITS u[.ixu rM1a R R SLAB AND POUR STRIPS REQUIREMENTS EGUIREMENT6 xriaavr a POTENTIAL OFFICE mM ^^ h Rw 1 I �V v � uw ewwrz�vu.wius sru rm uum ,mx.r a vin Rcn _ G. R� I �� �fiRR\ltR��\gym v vu n.wmn+xun \ ' 1 A a c o En A2. 1 ENLARGE LTT-,I� Q. V rn • D c m D XHoar nulVEvxolra �xmso-o i __ __-- __---____ J _ ---=-- ----------- --------� G7 - ---- -----_J__________�__ __tH-------L--------- 3L ■ _ __ __ _____________ prvner. 4._�___`_—_(_l__ _______ I 1 w.,mwnwma ' ________ _ _ Pmlacr. _____________________ ____________________________ 1 ____.-__�___________ __ A-------- Indsldai �I �.! u�...._......-__________.._..—....... ....... _ Building RANCHO rl --,- �__ __________ �___ C ____________J_________� �I ------------------------ ---- __ n ------ ---- _____ - - wmOa.zna _ yy � J 1 — —_ ' -- — —_ con.1n. - m. ________ t -__ - _ _ _ _ _____ _ ___ _ ------------ ---------------------- , r r r 1 I l G 1 IJ it � r ® ®, i l B `.� DyeRLLt EDKM APi x /.l� �I I - .�:s'm�ElnMiwss I I vati I i I 81fE 6ECT OHL 1�J p{! Mmnxr 4 ux� HI ow 41h$Neel bd Building RANCHO WAOA b TE 6ECTI8N 8-8 11 ■ Canu�hanEC j 4E«n�a i urC+tt M i I I 'r i it 1 i i j II II I i i i A1 .2 � © O O O O ■ aaaa HpA : I� •4 ��^ThI I J I I �` „ I �� 111 ..■. �;RI`"I �.h © o 0 o p o p o c ���o oom �0��°� Oo Oo O Oo moo mo Zt ` �a O o p o p Fill �Ii- Oo mo m p m O U O O O O O O - rl �� me mo me me o - moo - O Oo mo moo Oo ", . If { m ' © o North Flev-aton WN m 7-1 - i -- rnith cl=vatlon .ilil Street wvv Ila Jr IBM s p� i ME ME.= FBSt Lc band l:6i1 rq moi► _ _— ,...e....�.,,. .........e.,:A. R�larr od VWy'J of South FI^Vd11DI' - ;h ;h(f, - HPA - - • • • n, hlucture • • Job No 13216.00 COLORED ELEVATIONS 11.26.2014 2 PLAN VIEW I i : ELEVATION � ■ MO610 YMMTEU f NPMENT eCREfNM6 TYI. j Owner all •� :4 ^ $', 9 • "` mureaw t � i t ems_ Pnm LIYM`I t..0 TYPICAL PIPE XU SECTION� ■ AIX— �—ssiQl eS aS saran i Y Pmje2 alh Street 6Ma 'vrii, Industrigal 0L1SIPaRS „n $..$:f'y. ... •o.ss a..x raan ! Suilclin RAN vv CUCAMONGA' 1 Z• aNa6- —^••-- ."Su ama n w Lii ss•"s•w a.�ms oni...s a"• T m6 wwos m w_s aw.�reN�ws wwr'r a e 7 R..«a�nu _ YET1L FENC�RET�L6y T"mA CONCPETE.PEYf�I J GW16YIdIVX 417� 1YP61L ll /1V a�'rw EA PNti_la fIIN I w EXTERIOR WILL s M1M EM PY NMI ii H i A4. 1 ': I ._:a iu:wms m _n T6wR4fMCE ElEY1TpN/ul i i TYPIC THEN EPCLOBURE If.I r�LJ __ ,_ \ 9 I I k (� 11 -T1'I-LJ-R LW Il2mf PROPOSED PIAM PALETTE M MOM M mw Jli ®I PROPOSED - BUILDING ■G 4U SUeeI I I L ,w...:d;:.,m...";:.ap"r a,.•�.,..w.w.w. InEusirial ,\ j: ewxpLonvescMn�n4ons RANCHO CUCAMONGA N I i vnowyu LANDSCAPE DESIGN STATEMENT ca ■ I t I I d•l/ w..,.....�w ....e.... ""'m" CaasWwna: s.. I I � .«w... •. uancn nnw a ftIMN6 \ YV k labY T xM191 I I I�1 I i i I`fllu SII I' k WATER CONSERVATION NOTES -� kk mn I MCONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 4THSTRPET_ p �.�w.. �a,•� I _ _ _ _ ��. _ — ..m..own,.......w.........w.e........ I I I I I I L1 .1 I m w I DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith November 18, 2014 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566 — TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS-A proposal to construct an industrial building of about 116,480 square feet on a parcel of about 249,000 square feet(5.72 acres)within the Industrial Park(IP)District, located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue - APN: 0210-0371-02. Related case: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Desion Parameters: The project site is a parcel with an area of about 249,000 square feet (5.72 acres). The parcel is approximately 415 feet(east to west) by approximately 601 feet(north- south). The western two-thirds of the parcel was previously developed with two(2) buildings with a combined floor area of approximately 22,500 square feet, along with associated surface improvements such as asphalt storage/parking areas and landscaping comprised of ground cover and numerous mature trees along 4th Street and along the perimeter. A records search yielded incomplete information but based on the information that is available, these buildings were most likely constructed in the late 1970's or early 1980's. Within the last few years there has been ongoing deconstruction/demolition activity on the property; therefore, only the smaller of the two buildings, the paving, and the landscaping remain. The eastern one-third of the parcel is vacant and is dominated by short grasses. Development of the site for the subject project will result in the removal of all the identified improvements. The project site is bound on the north by industrial office buildings. To the east is a property that is partially developed with a building of approximately 13,000 square feet. To the west is a vacant property, while to the south, on the opposite side of 4th Street, is an apartment complex (Centre Club Apartments) in the City of Ontario. The zoning of the property and all properties to the north, east, and west is Industrial Park (IP) District. The zoning of the property to the south in the City of Ontario is Urban Residential —Ontario Center Specific Plan. With the exception of a sloped area along the north property line,the subject property is generally level with an elevation atthe north and south sides of approximately 1,041 feet and 1,030 feet, respectively. The applicant proposes to construct a warehouse distribution building of approximately 116,480 square feet. As the building is in excess of 50,000 square feet,activities within this building would be classified as"Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution—Medium." However, as this level of wholesale, storage, and distribution is not currently permitted in the Industrial Park(IP)District atthis time, the applicant has submitted an application to amend the Development Code (Related case: DRC2014-00567) to permit this land use. Typical for this type of building, there will be an office area located at the southeast corner of the building. The dock loading/storage area with 18 dock doors will be located on the east side of the building. There will be two points of access—one via an existing driveway and another via a new driveway at the southwest and southeast corners, respectively, of the project site. The existing driveway at the midpoint of the street frontage of the site will be removed. The building is required to have 76 passenger vehicle parking stalls, 78 parking stalls are provided. The distribution of landscaping will be generally equal throughout the project site. Generous ground cover and trees will be provided along the street frontage at 4th Street at the office area and along the north and west property lines. Additional landscaping will be provided along the north and west sides of the building. Landscape coverage is 12.6 percent; the minimum requirement is 15 percent for this Development District. Staff notes to the Committee that the applicant will have to provide additional landscaping to satisfy the minimum landscaping requirement. EXHIBIT L Item L-N 21 DRC ACTION AGENDA, DRC2014-00566—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS November 18, 2014 Page 2 The proposed building will be of concrete tilt-up construction painted with a palette of two colors (blue and shades of grey). The building will have sandblasted concrete accents. An additional primary material will be metal accents while a secondary material will be glass panels. Generous amounts of blue-tinted glass have been provided at the office area and at various locations along the wall planes of the building. A key feature is glass that is applied almost to the full height of the officer corner that gives it the appearance of a glass "cube." As the uses expected within the building are to be logistics-oriented, to maximize the efficiency of the interior space there is limited articulation of the wall planes along the east and west elevations of the building. Nevertheless, there will be horizontally articulated vertical elements located at intermediate points along that will interrupt the wall planes of the building. These vertical elements include glass panels. At the office corner, there are also horizontal metal accents that project from the wall plane. These accents punctuate the application of glass and provide shaded relief. On the east elevation, there are a couple of vertical design elements that minimize the expanse of plain, bare walls in the dock area. Lastly, all corners, with the exception of the northeast corner, are enhanced by utilizing different shades of grey, metal canopies, score lines, and relief in the wall plane that altogether reflect the general appearance of the office corner. A wrought iron fence/gate is proposed to be erected between the dock loading/yard area and the standards passenger vehicle parking area. Perimeter fencing will be comprised of a chain link fence along the east and west property lines. Along the north property line there is a concrete tilt-up wall of approximately 6 feet in height that will remain in-place. The majority of the buildings in the vicinity range in size from small industrial office buildings (primarily located to the north)of approximately 8,000 to 24,000 square feet in floor area to logistics buildings(generally located to the north and west)of approximately 550,000 to 850,000 square feet. The massing and scale of the building will be similar to a logistics building located approximately 280 feet to the northwest of the project site. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. Per Table 17.36.040-1 of the Development Code, the minimum open space requirement in the Industrial Park (IP) District is 15 percent. According to the "Project Data" table on Sheet A1.1, the landscape provided is 15.7 percent when including pavement, but 12.6 percent when the pavement is not included; the difference is approximately 6,000 square feet. Unless the pavement is for the purpose of pedestrian use, plaza areas, the outdoor eating area, etc., then pavement cannot be counted toward the open space requirement; vehicle parking areas cannot be included. Solutions include reducing the floor area of the building, providing additional landscaping at the northeast corner of the building, and providing landscaping in the area where the trailers are proposed to be stored. Note: Staff discussed the issue with the applicant and, at the time of the preparation of this report, he was in the process of addressing this deficiency and will provide updated Site and Landscape plans at the Committee meeting. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. Item L-N 22 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2014-00566—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS November 18, 2014 Page 3 1. At the northwest and southwest comers of the building and at the vertical elements along the wall plane on all elevations, incorporate a sandblasted concrete finish instead of relying only on paint color(in this case, Sherwin Williams SW 7072 and 7073)to differentiate the feature from the adjacent wall panels. 2. Per Section 17.48.050(E)(1)(e)of the Development Code,"within all land use categories except Heavy Industrial, all storage area screening shall be architecturally integrated with surrounding buildings by the use of concrete, masonry, or other similar materials not to exceed a height of eight feet(8 feet)from the highest finished grade." To comply with this requirement, a concrete tilt-up wall with a height of 8 feet that incorporates some of the design elements that are on the building, such as sandblasted finish, score lines, and matching painted scheme, shall be constructed between the standard passenger parking area and the dock loading/yard area instead of the wrought iron fence. The wrought iron gate shall have a metal mesh screen attached to it to minimize visibility through it. 3. Per Section 17.48.050(E)(2)(c) of the Development Code,within all land use categories except Heavy Industrial, all fencing or walls shall be wrought iron, concrete, masonry, or other similar materials not to exceed a height of eight feet(8 feet)from the highest finished grade.The use of barbed wire or similar materials is prohibited from these land use categories. Chain-link fencing may be used in areas not visible in front setback area." The chain link fencing along the west and east property lines shall not encroach into the 45-foot setback area. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corner of the building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks(DDC)and Fire Department Connections(FDC)screened behind a 4- foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the building. 2. All ground-mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back-flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on- center. All ground-mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 3. The employee lunch area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the building, and tables, chairs/benches, and waste receptacles shall be provided. 4. Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 5. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. 6. All walls, including retaining walls, exposed to public view shall be constructed of decorative masonry blocks, i.e. slump stone, split-face, or have a decorative finish such as stucco. Item L-N 23 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2014-00566—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS November 18, 2014 Page 4 7. Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the 45-foot setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. 8. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of the project to the Planning Commission, subject to revisions that are necessary to ensure the project complies with the landscape coverage requirement described in the Development Code, and forward it to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed the proposal and discussed the required revisions with the applicant. Staff noted to the Committee that prior to the meeting (but after this report was prepared)the applicant revised the landscaping of the project site in order to comply the landscape coverage requirement. A revised set of plans with the added landscaping was included in the presentation to the Committee. The applicant agreed to add sandblasted finish to the building and will comply with the other conditions that are described in this report. The Committee accepted the proposal subject to the revisions as noted and recommend approval to the Planning Commission. Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith Item L-N 24 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III, Chapter 17.32 reusable scrap and waste materials.This use does not include landfills or other terminal waste disposal sites. Also see Auto Vehicle Dismantling for related use for automobiles. Collection of recycling materials as the sole activity is included in the definition of Recycling Facility—Collection. 12. Research and Development. Indoor facilities for scientific research, and the design, development, and testing of electrical, electronic, magnetic, optical, and mechanical components in advance of product manufacturing, that is not associated with a manufacturing facility on the same site. Includes, but is not limited to, chemical and biotechnology research and development. Does not include computer software companies(see Office, Business and Professional), soils and other materials testing laboratories(see Business Support Services), or medical laboratories (see Medical Services, General). 13. Storage, Personal Storage Facility. A structure or group of structures containing generally small, individual, compartmentalized stalls or lockers rented as individual storage spaces and characterized by low parking demand. 14. Storage Warehouse. Facility for the storage of furniture, household goods, or other commercial goods of any nature. Includes cold storage. Does not include warehouse, storage, or mini-storage facilities offered for rent or lease to the general public(see Storage, Personal Storage Facility) or warehouse facilities in which the primary purpose of storage is for wholesaling and distribution(see Wholesale, Storage and Distribution (Heavy, Medium and Light)). 15. Storage Yard.The storage of various materials outside of a structure other than fencing, either as an accessory or principal use. 16. Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Heavy. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, warehousing, storage, freight handling, shipping, trucking services and terminals, and storage and wholesaling from the premises of unfinished, raw, or semi-refined products requiring further processing, fabrication, or manufacturing. Typical uses include, but are not limited to, trucking firms, and the wholesaling of metals, minerals, and agricultural products. Outdoor storage is permitted. 17. Wholesale,Storage,and Distribution—Light.Activities typically include, but are not limited to,wholesaling,storage,and warehousing services and storage and wholesale to retailers from the premises of finished goods and food products. Activities under this classification shall be conducted in enclosed buildings and occupy 50,000 square feet or less of building space. Retail sales from the premises may occur when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. 18. Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution—Medium. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, wholesale, storage, and warehousing services; moving and storage services; storage and wholesaling to retailers from the premises of finished goods and food products; and distribution facilities for large-scale retail firms. Activities under this classification shall be conducted in enclosed buildings and occupy greater than 50,000 square feet of building space. Included are multi-tenant or speculative buildings with over 50,000 square feet of warehouse space. 17.32-21 EXHIBIT M Item L-N 25 Article III, Chapter 17.30 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Land Use/Zoningg x x a v U v v v C 'a ? -v v District > J J. 22 = 2 U Z (.9 U Ji — 2 x 0 T LL Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Processing Recycling Facility, Scrap and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Dismantling Facility Research and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N N N N N Development Storage, Personal N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Storage Facility Storage Warehouse N N N N N N N N N C N N N N C C N N N N Storage Yard N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution— N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution— N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Light Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution— N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Medium (9) a eNotes: PC QUM (1) See additional regulations for second dwelling units in Chapter 17.100. (2) See additional regulations for home occupations in Chapter 17.92. (3) See additional regulations for mobile homes in Chapter 17.96. (4) See Additional regulations for animal keeping In Chapter 17.88. (5) Utility facilities and infrastructure involving hazardous or volatile gas and/or liquid pipeline development require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. (6) See additional regulations for adult entertainment businesses in Chapter 17.86.Adultoriented businesses are not permitted west of Haven Avenue. (7) See additional regulations for special regulated uses in Chapter 17.102. (8) See additional regulations for drive-in and drive-through facilities in Chapter 17.90. (9) Not permitted within 300 feet of residentially zoned property. (10) See additional regulations for wind energy systems In Chapter 17.76. (11) Family Day Care Home—Large requires approval of a Large Family Day Care Permit,not a Conditional Use Permit. Section 17.30.040 Other Allowed Use Provisions In addition to the allowed use provisions listed in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District), additional allowed use provisions are described in the following articles and chapters of this Title. A. Specific Use Requirements.Article V(Specific Use Requirements) identifies several use types that have special land use and/or development requirements. Some of these use types have special requirements or regulations established by state or federal law and others have special requirements based on local issues, priorities, and preferences. Use regulations in Article V are intended to supplement the allowed use 17.30-10 EXHIBIT N Item L-N 26 Article III, Chapter 17.30 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Land Use/Zoning -1 _ a V V V U V O I 1 a = to x V Q District > J -1 _ 2 O 2 (7 U 1/1 IX V — � � = O Z' W M Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Processing Recycling Facility, Scrap and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Dismantling Facility Research and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N Development Storage, Personal N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Storage Facility Storage Warehouse N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C C C N N N N Storage Yard N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution— N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N Heavy Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution— N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P N N N N Light Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution— N N N N N N N N N N N N JN -N- P P P N N N N Medium*(12) rable Notes: Delete "(9)" and add "(12)" n Chae to "P" (1) See additional regulations for second dwelling units in Chapter 17.100. g (2) See additional regulations for home occupations In Chapter 17.92. (3) See additional regulations for mobile homes in Chapter 17.96. (4) See Additional regulations for animal keeping in Chapter 17.88. (5) Utility fac/1ilies and Infrastructure involving hazardous of volatile gas and/or liquid pipeline development require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. (6) See additional regulations for adult entertainment businesses in Chapter 17.86.Adultortented businesses are not permitted west of Haven Avenue. (7) See additional regulations for special regulated uses in Chapter 17.102. (8) See additional regulations for drive-in and drive-through facilities in Chapter 17.90. (9) Not permitted within 300 feet of residentially Zoned property. (10) See additional regulations for wind energy systems in Chapter 17.76. (11) Family Day Care Home—Large requires approval of a Large Family Day Care Permit,not a Conditional Use Permit. Add Table Note #12 here (see below) Section 17.30.040 Other Allowed Use Provisions In addition to the allowed use provisions listed in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District), additional allowed use provisions are described in the following articles and chapters of this Title. A. Specific Use Requirements.Article V(Specific Use Requirements) identifies several use types that have special land use and/or development requirements. Some of these use types have special requirements or regulations established by state or federal law and others have special requirements based on local issues, priorities, and preferences. Use regulations in Article V are intended to supplement the allowed use (12) "Warehouse, Storage, and Distribution - Medium" is not permitted on any parcel that is located within, or partly within, 500 feet of the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. 17.30-10 EXHIBIT 0 Item L-N 27 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III, Chapter 17.38 TABLE 17.38.040-1 ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT 5 R T Pn�`� Assembly Use C Community Center/Civic Use P Indoor Fitness and Sports Facility- Large C Indoor Fitness and Sports Facility-Small C Park and Public Plaza C Public Safety Facility C School, Academic(Private) C School, Academic(Public) C School, College/University(Private) C School, College/University(Public) C Schools, Specialized Education and Training/Studio C Broadcasting and Recording Studios P Park and Ride Facility P Parking Facility C Transit Facility C Utility Facility and Infrastructure—Pipelines 111 P Alcoholic Beverage Sales C Banks and Financial Services P Business Support Services P Call Centers C Child Day Care Facility/Center C Convenience Store C Furniture, Furnishing, and Appliance Store C Hotel and Motel P Massage Establishment P Medical Services, General P Office, Business and Professional P Office,Accessory P Restaurant, No Liquor Service P EXHIBIT P 17.38-5 Item L-N 28 Article III, Chapter 17.38 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Land,Use/Zoning Distric � HA Restaurant, Beer and Wine P Restaurant, Full Liquor Service C Car Washing and Detailing(2),(3).(4) C Service Stations(2)�(3) C Table Notes: (1) Utility facilities and infrastructure involving hazardous or volatile gas and/or liquid pipeline development require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. (2) Service stations and car washing and detailing establishments are prohibited within Y2 mile of the Foothill Boulevard/Haven Avenue and the 4th StreetlHaven Avenue Intersections.No service station or car washing and detailing establishment shall be closer than Y mile of another service station or car washing and detailing establishment as measured from the nearest property line. (3) Service stations shall be designed to reflect the architectural standards and guidelines within the Haven Avenue Overlay District. No corporate prototype"architecture design will be permitted.Service stations are only permitted when designed as part of,and designed consistent with,profession office complexes. (4) Full service attended car washing and detailing establishments are permitted to operate a quick lube oil changes facility. Quick lube facilities that are part of an attended car wash shall be fully screened from the Haven Avenue right-of-way. D. Special Development Regulations. Special development regulations for the Haven Avenue Overlay Zoning District are intended to result in a progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development. Special site planning and landscaping requirements are included in Section 17.122.050 (Haven Avenue) to enhance the pedestrian environment and create a campus-like atmosphere. Section 17.38.050 Industrial Commercial Overlay Zoning District A. Purpose. The purpose of the Industrial Commercial Overlay District is to establish unique allowed use provisions and project compatibility requirements for areas of the city where both industrial park and retail development are compatible. B. Applicability. The Industrial Commercial Overlay Zoning District applies to property designated on the Zoning Map by reference letters "IC" after the reference letter(s) identifying the base zoning district. C. Allowed Use. Allowed uses for the Industrial Commercial Overlay Zoning District are listed below in Table 17.38.050-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements for Industrial Commercial Overlay Zoning District). Generally, a use is either allowed by right, allowed through issuance of a conditional use permit, or not permitted. In the table below, a land use shown with a "P" indicates that the land use is permitted by right in the designated zoning district, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this Title (e.g., development standards) as well state and federal law. Additionally, a land use shown with a "C" indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of a Conditional Use Permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this Zoning Code(e.g., development standards)as well as state and federal law. Uses not listed in the table are not permitted. In the event of a conflict between the allowed uses for this district and the allowed uses of the underlying base zoning district, the allowed uses for this district shall apply. 17.38-6 Item L-N 29 loin, I S .5 nrr, L:ri lna. g��: "6'-r.'it11E IR LCL";::�mg nnmr. ItR'Ek�trua JR .1' i w' S' -xx n v n.%s rE.��S_ -:z1y ':.sem •nuz�g a°-:=1�I=- i{•-rnn• r.{P' r''• u,�T ii.7,' _""5 a _a u. � ■ 'a �a .3Er5al��s':5,a�bl ua:::-s:=rr�r1'--�•"v Ef=%��Gi= _ _ _: ea ,Id i . L •1'm:::°::=n r :EI i L:." _ m"'nE7E1 + : nni.'r liiiiS of m°u .:nn::iirs a 5u. � M,I 'I-; is gg5 1 1 _�•S a '3 sig ..+' I S 1 nin i nnnnn.o.n.n..y..m:'rm EE SLr�.i yirmm�nl r�:1�5 iii� __ 'F?7J^,✓ °%:;rel^^„ Gi.i n. �' a z..unnnnol• r� ...i, yc ooa:::-... nnnuu rv�d_IQx t"o x .'." ° - az�:umnun".".` ti „E�:a��:rY'IG ee_:c.°S Es s:�ES s'-_=- u'S onn'� '•r � tS'dr;%';;;"" alit"x. - ran�mn ?s°::; :!:• ___"._ .:__ �>a .�.'rnt _ ;'iii_--_".',.�-,��'I't��'I,' . r ° !' 'ii'vj �::�� ••eq €: :555:--°"a:� c�.n� °"_-�r t� _. 1'i-_'�'-''•_ ._ - _ n hl a,;s•� `E:_�! :_.._._-_ix Ir.� �,I�pa_a �■ I r - p«Ls-1111 x a i ' aar 1x1111 z'Si, a Iz 35 e:•e: .... 11r '- iO:E•:::z:: nm-_ _ a a �JIL• .y1J•i1::. .` e r n n a° ,unminil•'7�i tri t�-f� - :. z::z � �„t.7 :3a v=: 't� �f� .. � � _l C1 nIC 4 Sun u:?_Lirn4:ln°F i 5:'SSSSuiiin �.. � - •, .o'\`7au�@ 3 p.....• IIIc 1�1Lr n . ::�E�of_R1 �r ae-:_•::::5'e 2_ � Ys ° n nln, u r n`I , 't..S°. '. • ' ��S}nii E°•a_ _ S.n.___�57iiti�7Yiiii9 � "'� :•••-•nn r •.:■� a max;.', � a L .'•:' ' °i:;::S 5 71.L'SSAi�,1 1 �iiiT a n °„",uuiuci �° . ..E En ... . 'Stt"t 1 it 6t �� � �C... °�.� a■ 1 �I°' �� _ _,. .�/�_�J �-- ■ T" Ilr IIIIIIIIIIIn - ;NII nll r1 - - — _ kr3 'c_an- nL de:.41.g c s� s�, o ,p.i I• va_na 515WE E:ezz is :°s .nI .. p - ax�::::z x ...... - i . ..i_ wnn7nl nom r 4 .� my 777.1 p.x5 pn" 1 111111 S G1.. / 5 � r m n nim'`�:"c•a_r� non ��■ ,� 1 S IMM. wnnSl g::- - x y7 m.11 ax.:o1F k� to fn limn 71 3 L 71_i ei 3 nti� 1 nn��LTS]r[,I ■. ���� =a' 'a 1 . nn. t1 _ - �II"dI A7 �.qn I sl 7+ ■ r n n s �,� e � � •bo rl�� � 4'a s.; ��itt- '/� 1�1 „ LrrEN�� ti. I I111'E-�i��_..\.■t�r•- 3-_�'=;;t' J• ■1 Ilii �.. '��` 21=1C = .1 llu 11 llll 111 IIIIIIIIIII 1_■=: - . �' a 9111II11�11nl�illl kllllll �- 5 x:O 1i ■ L a 1X11111 .IIIII'•'kl■ ■ �illl I IIII 111 II III II Siu7S7S'SS'n� ■S =�/ . I I 1 1 1 111 , I 1111111 Ij'!I IIII Il nl Ul 1111.alnlllp I _ __ ■ - II II �Illl�lllib nllnl 31111--II _ _ _ —t IIIIL 11�^, r C ' ti„51,S'SS7SS s---znn7nn n �7. II. =gz 77'71171 t71r : r�-"�f�■�' L i u:."a_ nm 1NI n1z.�u I _ i.- �1111L1■ - iluii(�� Hall 1 �3 INiEF.;ihiC k 15 ■ 111 • - - - • • mm � v. n.:5° __535q iii: S.'as_x::x:m '. 9i �rp5 nno.. "{S +�i: - 33 r. iai.5, n, .s. r...-N v u -:uS=S.•r�:5 z_•r.N�h�irin -...-r.5_ „__ -b•5--:axe _E: :e av_s ,6-..-.n..Q%ii s_.x� x ale 5s� n\\I Ci1JS:=x3 Ed Lny i/v �� ME. m `' m am �_ � C SaG.•ec a_'E 55 i1:4J • i m5n 2 _� � I r = �J „�: •��d:'a L' Jl. a e jaS.rSE�€ ,t •'It• x_ k i r anw, nnS �„ ASPi �R'{l:l= w1m Ei: 55 x x�' _ ' w' . -ni i -;i L'A.u• ,.. i, Ei{:=:�x 73: r 65m- An:'n sa 3 � __••. E �rC r.■ �� i� - i i 7[ I�i� l �n l I �4■ '='1-11 l _ �J as . .- :.,. M E a� .n a��iini'i a_a - �ru��u�\ • .-3''��5 { rL�._—_ _- 1-11� l .,I. u . '3 _ .narn "rr ir'_�^-"� •'n SU E'=i?„ E' el ;u � '� _ L y � -i Ll �.l ■ �� �_ :� II IIIN III III ylllll: � r nr n r r � :nn,,, 11�161r � -'' •: o i I l.I 1 ' r i10 � r'' a • ” ; � f i - _ � ` 3 J J I - r� -v Street aaiii':i.,J1S94E • s__.J� �� L_ 1 ...I•lil . . ■Nll 1 a 1 35 as x e In. n 5 �- 1 a, _m :o• F �• � 5: •M�i�2 ez, w^5 ■' C� o_c 31i � rl� sem P✓•! �� •.�L'nie aaTa:=-:Is u!I : � e� � } M -�5 x� _ _ , .oa!_3 -�: :.":'9a,-•��2�:i5 nw mm• Pn'=•semy �.'fr� '.�ipa ,,,fll--•�- t :. >' ^ 3m umr t'�ssul< 3i " =C'^ u? ' a '-1n.o r¢nn ■ - 'nN' �'utS'ffo i' z f.f .a 3:"3:5 _ s3 55. I:u•t of 1 '.L■ 1._ , ��'���y .' ? a'J 'aun -=-s _¢-_.n'. 'n5 � .5=•31 ' .lur ei^n 51 1 3 •� rii'nm M • nev ,1 =5 5: i'2 pae:n moon• � .. • 1's - . m'-__ - _ _n i I' 1- 6•., , l- 2 . �.' w. �• -4•d ma=a Em e u i e nl\ E a,. _ � _ ilm •-I ens. �o;.. 5=e ?2a°eem .. - ■. ^.. I � 1 IJ \rr.,s; s sea _ i 1- ,Y .3e° .f =•a : 11 is°" o..:dao— .T._ ml 5 �.,1 O '71' 3 _ 17.f r 5 - nn.• a3s a' Si' -7f ml m mex a: o v r; S La "n�'_'a'-5's"y('.tt:'ft n g •]155'e__ ulrl �m 5 3 I�i 'i si��=itn w.Ion.Y.::i:: ♦ ..Fo°- 2 SGRt:'i V ' ,, "5=.z�' ::r a.ii:m®�a m.5 .2�•m 35k J '. r S x `�'' A� e e '/n Fm° e x 1:. =a:{i'n� "w''TG:Gt::■ I '�;,' `0`c I;K� �iG::o _ Er _.i 2:i__m3=s. '�3 :=eta- Loam, ` 2:"si G: . G"GC'w■ 7c,' ..'. r.. .�� `_� 3 is 2°••• .,::�In.:n�.r — e 5d Mirf 3e 5 �1i I nv.!!I ■inl s � ...rl 1 nn...3 e= wl �;/3 3 I h� 311 �. �2"::>•m lis s--a 5 53 3cu x�:�� , _ - ..�.�1\ ::n '' �. I ty,�� -I� ., _. �Im •.e: I.I:i aa� 'S6!`:_ ° 1IM � I• n{ 1^ Y)t���I.. �.�. -� ■ �rr�� ' ° � �� 8°a -• i'i'i e- �l r li° i-07 ! � II16 � 1 r r o sl s'� ' a unmm� . e • LJ =)YLY III(I[I +i � 1 .,5lmlglLWlk11 LANAI nlln lxlli'.:i' I -- ■ 1�3i alt, nl IN � S:: NI WNIIIIIILIIIII .1111111 � 5a � � �—� • �� y,_�-s -_: 1111 11111110 Alliln •x_e" � � V 'iia 91111111111111111!_Jllilli ' _ a ttii - � INIIIIii IIIINI[I. .w .INI111I1141 il1111111 I ' nl l ■i�, 011 ��1 i iiili��iir111'161 :1111'1181 I1 � AW,_1l`I11 m At1,r ,� e 'I;{ISI {X=��- mm{{an I�u �■ �■ I - � • LIN teeet i:G i ■ 111 15 • • r9imm"I.O., E= 1 Ill FVAI � 9 -'•_'e'•�•e•..i.II' 7imE-san�n�n.. �zII9:^E:xEnm`�::om:B.m nrr•mnuyn o�t l•wumy�nll!1'fitIc.�aaJ�a:i:E_e'a•E•:eE•Q 5 E a fi=E�u•..ia.'ia:17lu6•�.77.u7i77n.u 7R�i3S..1'.79. 117 X11 l ° _ 4' G' • n_`easi tE:: .�_ ... n.^77,. =..77. ^6^8^.n�i iJ II � n ''o "ta..' _ _ � n C' � ` 3_° '{"?'•__h¢'i�a7":: vd'.'. 'i ��°a�3 Lam. i �xv�ia4 w�. �� • L77 '�y1G1..� .iiii v. fj d! -_ :3'i:: ::.Ts ��Q: eeE a�SE II� /+ 1 I au ♦ i¢ _ �•� : 1 .11" �3 iE sB=:_ C':HS_- 'fis= � a +, "7 ... ........7, �..-, '7E �3= + C �tl �_ _li•'-� 51���5,-da::a' :¢:w'' L7i7"' -I fa 1 0 ,4,: _ " 177. • •CS �S \•E ( •1 '�-iil lipiY..' �I�f7 Ila � �1 ��$:¢:�. 1 n7.'..n. � .--�....wn .,. � n..- y '3E..''�_;!¢,_'��.€ba�nx�_ yy •Gas Y�IM'±j� — • ■ 11 �� �p� _ yrn a JI w r _ I� ' a�'. y -k�i�ll3ax rm.�i.n 1• 7 ,, ^. !I 5 v . � 1 1 ii>'xlNHlli _ inlnWn'. 411 = 11111• _ o . _������ .� _ �� 1191 H 3 W{r ' 1 uux� N Illi L� rum ` 71 1gii - i 0 ninnriAnllH.._ I in 1 � 'rA�' — a= 1�II — IIAIA-1 �.�a nir I 1 '■�i=� � ,IAC r �1 T IIII L�I.xllllllllll nn.G�11111111111111 . r n nxn.a:.um mon il•J• • •� . = MINOR n r Ir aE_E.Ilmwlll II--1--1 s7e • :: -- E nnmo,a":nuunun I _,i �.IIN1 lWwnlxl xlll m�� , ■ S�tiR�s I Iia G - ' a 7.11 t •i _ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following.Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Public Review Period Closes: January 28, 2015 Project Name: Project Applicant: Turner Real Estate Investments Jason Korengold Project Location (also see attached map): Located within the Industrial Park (IP) District at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue -APN: 0210-371-02. Project Description: A review of a proposal to amend the Development Code to allow buildings with floor areas in excess of 50,000 square feet to be constructed and operated for the purpose of logistics (warehouse/storage/distribution) on parcels that are within the Industrial Park (IP) District, and review of a proposal to construct an industrial logistics building of about 116,480 square feet on a parcel of about 249,000 square feet (5.72 acres) within the Industrial Park (IP) District. Related file: DRC2014-00845. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Reportwill not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. January 28 2015 Date of Determination Adopted By Item L-N 34 HIM J ILJ• •'Ii.Et�I u— n ,aoov f a T - . IZ •; . - i - �/: ii a yI it °__ ��� < ] 11 N II II 270 ml Alf 123 n I I ..,n^�•s'�: � II a II i�� ML- u i41 ! 4 Lk NE . ,Z ' BM 1208 0 o �- o u Xd00-. �• railer ,p. - a • � II II p Itor ._••lie qv u I no ul-€ Y• j8oit 170 ■ ,• 1 a l . I < ........ r Eye . GA • l■ =1`; 1130- 7-- N 130 .::. • ...._..rte.: ..... ......:::...:. AT EKA /� N .. ' . .-. e n ST Rochester -� ®Reservoiwo = -- i; Well PROJECT SITE -,,,V-� II /o _______ Well° Ir o I'________oWell____ 1 ._ II II II II D>p\In p_: o eos /050 Welloll 0 it It R O —AVE. RANCHO CA _ C _ _c— BOUNDAR oReser f \\ f DWA N - sf a II b Z 1 ! II !Oa mB •V+ II II \\\ f f�—' 23r ♦ �� 8 /000 `----------- - - - �IJater /��• € 41 © 0 LANE Ggaish � ■ �� I �. 970 OGO ■ N .WT `\ 963 _ :•€ `�� Well- I ii ° n�f II N II II I s0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��• .� �� ENVIRONMENTAL • �- JUN 17 2014 INFORMATION FORM F E�V D �JANNIN,G (Part I - Initial Study) RANCEFO R`(QE Ye Q,priest 1� �,;UCAMONGA Use the tab key to move from one fine to the next line.) Planning Department (909)477-2750 The-purpose of this;form is.;#o inform the City_of.the-.bas:ic:components:of the:°proposed. . project so that the Citymay rev--sew the project pursuant to City.Policies,Ordinances,and: Guidelines;. the California.=Enviionmental,.,Q:uality; Act: :and= the. City_s_-`Ru.les-,And Procedures to Implement CEQA.-:If is 'iriiporfAM t-at the information requested in this'. ,._ application be provided in:.full.:: U on..review_-:gf_the_com leted' Inst al_:Stud ;:Past land tfie develo""menta - lication . additional information,suchas;:bi t:not-.limited;to,,traffic;noise;biological;drainage;and .. geological:reports may:`b 1:quired ;The project application will-not;be dedn ed-c:: tete:- unless the identifed;special-iii are;-.submitted for review and;.accepted.as : . _ complete and adequate.:,The project?application::will:no ,b'e-s`cheduled-for"Committees'::. review-unless all:-.required reports are submitted- and•deemed:.cornplete-for staff prepare the:_Initial study Part II`as:required by,CEQA; _In;addition:to.;thefiing fee;'the,:.,. applicant will.be responsibleti pay or:reimburse,-the.City,_its'=agents, officers; andlor consultants ::for;:all:_costs>:;for: the. preparation '.reviews analysis;;.reco_ mmendations :. mitigations, etc of any-special studies°'or reports:: • GENERAL INFORMATION: - INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: wl �"'`N 1"�-ytLi " Project Title: Turner Crossing-Rancho Name&Address of project owner(s): Rusty Turner, Managing Member 1500 Quail Street, Suite 150 Newport Beach, California 92507 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor: TREF Rancho, LLC 1500 Quail Street, Suite 150 Newport Beach, California 92660 • Updated 4111!2013 Page 1 of 10 Item L-N 36 Contact Person&Address: Jason Korengold, Director of Acquisitions 949-757-5411 Name&Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): Christopher Brown, MIG Hogle-Ireland 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, California 9.2507 Telephone Number. 951-787-9222 PROJECT • ' • Information indicated by an asterisk(*)is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. *1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east,and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): 10220 4th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 0210-371-02 *5) Gross Site Area(ac/sq.ft.): 5.73 AC/249,316 SF *6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed dedications): 5.73 AC1249,316 SF ' 7) - Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site ------- --- - (attach additional sheet if necessary): N/A Updated 4111/2013 Page 2 of 10 Item L-N 37 ® 8) include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Design Review, Development Code Amendment 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography,soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological and/or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The.project site is developed with an existing 22,500-SF steel/heavy construction industrial building (1976)with parking lot and landscaping. Approximately 2.3 AC of the project site is undeveloped and vegetated with ruderal/annual weeds(General Biological Assessment). Observed wildlife include birds, house finch,Audubon's cottontail, and Beechey ground squirrel (General Biological Assessment). Mature trees on the developed portion of the project site include Chinese elm and eucalyptus. No roads, trails,or drainage ® courses exist on site. The project is not located within a scenic vista and does not contain any scenic viewing points. On-site soils consist of Tujunga loamy sand(Soil Survey). On-site soils are somewhat excessively drained with groundwater in excess of 80 inches from the surface. Linear extensibility is low. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 3 of 10 Item L-N 38 i 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): The existing on-site structure is 38 years old and thus has little potential as a historic resource. There are no known cultural/historic resources located on the project site(General Plan EIR). 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: The project site is exposed to traffic noise levels of approximately 69.3-72.5 dBA CNEL(General Plan EIR). This is in excess of the the 65 dBA Ldn exterior and 60 dBA Ldn noise level standards identified in the General Plan Noise Element The project site is not within the noise contours of the Ontario International Airport(ALUCP). There is no major rail in proximity to the project site. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of . development to occur with each phase,and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: See Attached. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any culturel,"'histoncal,or scenic- aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops,department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height,frontage,setback,rear yard,etc.): West: Undeveloped/Vacant North: Light Industrial, Single-Story East: Light IndustrialNacant,Single-Story South: Multi-Family Residential,Three-Story Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 Item L-N 39 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern,scale,or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No,this project is limited to on-site improvements in an existing industrial area. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Temporary short-term construction-related noise will be generated that may require mitigation such as sound barriers and equipment'staging strategies. Long-term operational noise is not anticipated to be excessive due to minimal traffic generation and lack of on-site point-source noise. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: None. 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: The project will drain to Deer Creek before merging with Cucamonga Creek and ultimately discharging at Prado Dam. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) Peak use(gal/Day) b. CommercialAnd. (gal/day/ac) 10,010 Peak use(gal/min/ac) UNK 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. Septic Tank El Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) 1 b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) 17,1a r Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 Item L-N 40 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes,minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: " Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent(per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary., b. Junior High: c. Senior High - ... .._._.... —...- — - . . ._.. COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial,industrial or institutional uses: Warehouse/Distribution Updated 4/11/2013 Page 6 of 10 Item L-N 41 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: • 116,480 square feet(109,480 SF Warehouse; 3,500 SF Office; 3,500 SF Mezzanine) 27) Indicate hours of operation: Potential 24 hours per day, seven days a week 28) Number of employees: 255 Total: Maximum Shift: UNK(Speculative Building) Time of Maximum Shift: UNK(Speculative Building) 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): UNK(Speculative Building) 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City. ® '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818)572-6283): Diesel Particulate Matter-Heavy-Truck Traffic. No point-source emissions known at this time. May require SCAQMD permit for diesel generators if proposed by tenant. Short-term VOC emissions from project construction (mitigated with use of low-VOC coatings). ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? if so,please indicate their response. The Project is located within the service areas of the Cucamonga Valley Water District(Water/Sewer). Will- serve letters will be processed prior to approval of entitlements. Fire flow has been confirmed by CVWD. Flood control has not been contacted. All applicable service providers will be contacted during entitlement processing. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 7 of 10 Item L-N 42 33) In the known.history of this property,has there been any use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and(or toxic materials Include,but are not limited to PCt3 s-radioactive substances;pesticides and herbicides fuels,*Us,solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage ofanyofthe above. Please list the materials and describe their use,storage,and(or discharge on the property,as we#as the dates of use,it known. According to USEPA EnviroFacts,project site has no history of use,storage;or discharge of hazardous materials or wastes. DTSC indicates the site is not a Hazardous Waste and Substances site.SWRCB indicates site is not a LUST site. 34) Will the proposed project Involve the temporary.or long-term use storage,ordischarge ofhazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? !f yes,provide an inventory of a!f such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses,along with the storage and shlpmentareas,shad be shown and labeled an the application plans. Temporary use of hazardous materials(e.g.paints)during construction. Pio known long-term use of hazardous materials during operation. Any temporary or long-term use,transport,and/or disposal of hazardous materials or wastes will be done so in accordance wit.federal and state regulations. 35) The applicant shaft be required to pay any applicable Fish and Came fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to.the Clerk of the Beard Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: t hereby certify that the statements furnished above and In the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluatron of this project to the best ofmy ability,that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct fat he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional in€ormatbn may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. June 10,2014 c., :: :r_;..::.•:..., Date: Signature: :.... rdJe. Director of Environmental Services Updated 4/11/2013 Page 8 of 10 Item L-N 43 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) . General Commercial .4082 ga.l/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day • Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering& Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 9 of 10 Item L-N 44 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road,Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario,CA 91762 (909)988-8511 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 10 of 10 Item L-N 45 City of Rancho Cucamonga - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 2. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845 3. Description of Project: A review of a proposal to amend the Development Code to allow buildings with floor areas in excess of 50,000 square feet to be constructed and operated for the purpose of logistics (warehouse/storage/distribution) on parcels that are within the Industrial Park (IP) District, and review a proposal to construct an industrial logistics building of about 116,480 square feet on a parcel of about 249,000 square feet (5.72 acres) within the Industrial Park (IP) District, located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue-APN: 0210-371-02. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Jason Korengold Turner Real Estate Investments 1500 Quail Street, Suite 150 Newport Beach, California 92660 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park 6. Zoning: Industrial Park(IP)District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is a parcel with an area of about 249,000 square feet (5.72 acres). The parcel is about 415 feet (east to west) by about 601 feet (north to south). The western two-thirds of the parcel was previously developed with two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 22,500 square feet and associated surface improvements such as asphalt storage/parking areas and landscaping comprised of ground cover and numerous mature trees along 4th Street and along the perimeter. The City's records are incomplete regarding these . buildings but based on the information that is available, these buildings were most likely constructed in the early 1980s. Within the last few years there has been ongoing deconstruction/demolition activity on the property and, therefore, only the smaller of the two buildings, the paving, and the landscaping remain. The eastern one-third of parcel is vacant-and is dominated by short grasses. Development of the site for the subject project will result in the removal of all the identified improvements. The project site is bound on the north by industrial office buildings. To the east is a property that is partially developed with a building of about 13,000 square feet. To the west is a vacant property while to the south, on the opposite side of 4th Street, is an apartment complex (Centre Club Apartments) in the City of Ontario. The zoning of the property and all properties to the north, east, and west is Industrial Park (IP) District. The zoning of the property to the south in the City of Ontario is Urban Residential — Ontario Center Specific Plan. The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1,041 feet and 1,030 feet, respectively. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Item L-N 46 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 2 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith,Acting Senior Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD—California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR—Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR- Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System - -- - NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG—Reactive Organic Gases PM,o—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (x)Aesthetics ( )Agricultural Resources (x)Air Quality (x)Biological Resources (x)Cultural Resources (x)Geology&Soils (x)Greenhouse Gas (x)Hazards&Waste Materials (x) Hydrology&Water Quality Emissions ( ) Mineral Resources (x) Noise ( ) Land Use& Planning ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( )Population & Housing ( ) Utilities&Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of ( )Transportation/Traffic Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I .find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 47 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00566 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 Page 3 ® An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant,effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION purs nt to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earl' IR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation m asures that are im d up the proposed project, nothing further is requCed. Prepared By: Date: Reviewed By: Da#e' Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 48 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storaoe/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial-Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to a scenic vista caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary,the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction..and.use.of.a-... building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storacle/distribution uses is not permitted.--Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact(if any)to scenic resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary,the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) The project site is located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue. The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north, east, and west, and residential development to the south in the City of Ontario. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. The western two-thirds of the parcel was previously developed with two (2).buildings with a combined floor area of about 22,500 square feet. Within the last few years there has been ongoing deconstruction/demolition activity on the property and, therefore, only the smaller of the two buildings remains. The site will be developed with an industrial building that will be similar to the newer buildings Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 49 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 5 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact in the industrial areas of the City. Staff has determined that the architecture of the building is consistent with the design standards, guidelines, and policies established by the Planning Commission and City Council. The project complies with the City's technical requirements including floor area ratio; minimum building, parking lot, and wall setbacks; dock and storage area screening; and landscape coverage as described in the Development Code. Approval by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission is required prior to construction of the buildings. City standards require the applicant to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution.No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to the visual character or quality caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. • d) The project will increase the number of street lights in the immediate vicinity and the amount of industrial lighting used within the site - particularly within the dock and storage areas. The design and placement of street lights will be required to comply with City standards including requirements for shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Although industrial lighting can be a source of substantial glare, such lighting will be required to comply with the City standards for maximum height applicable to light poles and wall-mounted lights. Due to the bulk of the buildings, the general layout of the buildings and associated screen walls, and existing surrounding industrial development, the impact of the lights on sensitive receptors such as residences will be limited. The .impact is not considered significant. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000- square-feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to substantial light or glare caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 50 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant tufitigatlon Significant No I act Ineo orated Impact Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contracf7 C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The project site is located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of. Haven Avenue... The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north, east, and west, and residential development to the south in the City of Ontario. There are approximately 209 acres.of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and.planned.for.development. Further, a large.number of the . designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion.of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the. purpose of warehouse/stora-ge/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 51 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 7 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact review by the City, the impact (if any) to agricultural resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The project site is located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue. The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north, east; and west, and residential development to the south in the City of Ontario. There are no agricultural uses within one mile of the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of • Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square- feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to agricultural resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing • emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 52 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Poteftally With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Im actI act d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the ability of the region to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storaae/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to cultural resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include - ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than. 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM,o and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the. jurisdiction of the South Coast Air. Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mail and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board(ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 53 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 9 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM1o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide(S02), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Non-attainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.s. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality and ClimateChange Assessment was prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in • June 2014 that utilizes the CaIEEMod methodology and CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993 to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Green House Gas Emissions. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/stora-ge/distribution uses'is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Short Term(Construction) Impacts Per the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland, construction of the building is anticipated to start in early 2015. In general, Ca/EEMod defaults for construction schedule phase duration and equipment needs were utilized, however, the Building Construction phase was reduced in length by half to be consistent with the anticipated construction schedule. Equipment needs were concurrently doubled to account for the accelerated timeframe. Trenching was also included as an additional phase to account for utility installation. Soil import and export will not be required during grading activities. �,..,. . ;...,. _ ,,. .. ..,. ximurtt:Dai cfirorr E sson§ lbstd nsti'u m n ROG NO, CO SOX PM10 PIV112.5 Summer 2015 73.45 64.69 49.45 0.08 21.36 12.83 Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 54 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566. Page 10 Less Than Significant Less poteftally With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Winter 2015 73.45 64.86 49.71 0.08 24.36 12.83 Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Substantial? No No No No No No ROG=reactive organic gases;NOX=oxides of nitrogen;CO=carbon monoxide;SO:=oxides of sulfur, PMto and PMz.s=particulate matter Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment-(Table 9)(CaIEEMod Output) MIG/Hogle-Ireland,June 2014 Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on-site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions that are generally associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction: Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors.The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. There is one industrial building proposed for the project. Per the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland, Based on the results of the model, maximum daily emissions from the construction of the warehouses will result in excessive emissions of volatile organic chemicals (identified as reactive organic gases) associated with interior and exterior coating activities (see Appendix A). To compensate for excessive VOC emissions from coating activities, the model includes use.of a minimum 100 grams per liter (g/l) VOC content for interior and exterior coatings. Use of low-VOC coatings during construction activities will reduce VOC emissions to 73.45 lbs/day, less than the threshold established by SCAQMD. The requirement for use of low-VOC coatings has been included as Mitigation Measure AQ-1 in Section 8 of this report, and as follows: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the project proponent shall submit, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, a Coating Restriction Plan (CRP), consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) guidelines and a letter agreeing to include in any construction contracts and/or subcontracts a requirement that the contractors adhere to the CRP. The CRP measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of City Building Director.These may include the following: Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 11 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Im act • That volatile organic compounds (VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 100 for interior applications. • That volatile organic compounds (VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 100 g/I for exterior applications. This measure shall conform to the performance standard that emissions of volatile organic compounds from application of interior or exterior coatings shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Coast- Air Quality Management District. The CRP shall specify use of HighVolume, Low Pressure(HVLP)spray guns for application of coatings. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area'during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the expected uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. • Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County,.and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures(short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) on a project speck basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 2) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition • so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 56 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Utigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized,or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast. Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. 4) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall beappliedeither by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 5) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 6) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. . . . Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil . during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds _(I.d.-, -win -speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 7) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 8) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD . and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 57 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 13 ® Less Than Significant Less poteIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significantally With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 9) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 10) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (Os), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PMJo) would. exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Long Term (Operational) Impacts Lonq Term Project Operational Emissions Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of industrial buildings/uses in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source • emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. -:Mazi'muiaiYQ: erational Dait. :Em#ss)ot: !!�§fda- Summe_ .`•s;r w _ 0. �}V ROGNOC NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.s Area 5.93 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile 1.89 15.17 26.27 0.08 5.28 1.58 Total 7.83 15.23 26.34 0.08 5.28 1.58 Significant 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Significant No No No No No No Impact . Max rtt irr�Operatlon afly �� •`a1 ROGNOC NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5 Area 5.93 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile 1.96 . 15.77 26.66 0.08 5.29 1.58 Total 7.90 15.83 26.73 0.08 5.29 1.59 Significant 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Significant No No No No No No Impact • Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment-(Table 10)(CaIEEMod Output) MIG/Ho le-Ireland,June 2014 Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 58 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures(long term) Lona Term (Operational) Emissions - The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR)analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 12) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 13) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 14) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01.measure. 15) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods(i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 17) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations- was -ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the-General Plan FPEIR(Section 4:3). - C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR(Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase.in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Development Code Amendment DR02014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 59 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 15 • Less Than. Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor - to the south, on the opposite side of 4th Street, is an apartment complex(Centre Club Apartments)in the City of Ontario. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the • Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Toxic Air Contaminants Per the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in June 2014, cancer risk and non-cancer health risks from construction activities were analyzed using the using the EPA SCREEN3 model and guidance provided by SCAQMD. The emissions factors for idling trucks and on-site truck movement were modeled using EMFAC2011. Idling and running emissions (5 mph) were modeled for average hourly truck traffic. With a project site size of 152,242.7 square meters, the maximum idling and running emissions factor from the proposed building is 7.7047E-10 grams per second per square meter (g/sec/m2). SCREEN3 indicates that the worst-case maximum concentration will occur 117 meters from the northeast of the project site at 2.063E-03 g/sec/m2. The maximum DPM concentration at the-residences located south of the project site is estimated at 2.979E-03 g/sec/m2. Cancer risk assessment assumes a lifetime exposure of 70 years because the nearby residences are sensitive receptors. The incremental increase of cancer risk at nearby residences is 0.08 persons in one million. The incremental increase of cancer risk at the maximum concentration 117 meters from the northeast corner of the project site is 0.09 persons in one million. These incremental increases are less than the threshold of 10 in one million (10.000E-06) established by SCAQMD. The non-cancer hazard index is 0.001 at both locations. These hazard index values are less than the threshold of 1.0 established by SCAQMD. Therefore, the impacts will be less-than-significant. Localized Significance Thresholds According to the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG/Hogle- Ireland in June 2014, construction-related criteria pollutant emissions and potentially Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 60 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No impact Inco orated Impact Impact significant localized impacts were evaluated pursuant to the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Thresholds Methodology. Daily emissions of daily of nitrogen (NOX), carbon monoxide(CO), and particulate matter(PM10 and PM2.5)that will occur during demolition of existing facilities, construction of the project, grading of the project site; and paving of facility parking lots and drive aisles will not exceed any localized threshold. Therefore, the impacts will be less-than-significant. Carbon Monoxide(CO)Hotspots . . A carbon monoxide (CO) hotspot is an area of localized CO pollution that is caused by severe vehicle congestion on major roadways, typically near intersections. CO hotspots have the potential to violate State and Federal CO standards at intersections. Per the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in June 2014, the project is not regionally significant and therefore is only required to examine local impacts...the local analysis indicate that a project has the potential to worsen air quality if it will result in an increase in the number of vehicles operating in cold start mode by more than two percent, increases traffic volumes by rive percent, or worsens traffic flow by reducing speeds by three miles per, hour or more. Based on an analysis conducted per Protocol Section 4, the project passes the screening analysis and impacts are deemed acceptable. Based on the local analysis procedures, the project is satisfactory pursuant to the Protocol and will not result in a CO hotspot. Therefore, the impacts will be less-than- significant. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. The proposed project is the construction and operation of an industrial building of about 116,480 square feet. Typically, warehouse/distribution activities do not create objectionable odors that are normally associated with, for example, heavy manufacturing operations. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed. 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with. a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/stora-ge/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the-City-of-any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Rev.2-26-13 Item L-N 61 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 17 • LIncoorated Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyThan Significant Significant No Impact Im act Im act 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Have.a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U:S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a- substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.). through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue. The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north, east, and west, and residential development to the south in the City of Ontario. The western two-thirds of the parcel was previously developed with two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 22,500 square feet. Within the last few years there has been ongoing deconstruction/demolition activity on the property and, therefore, only the smaller of the two buildings remains. The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-005.67 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in .floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a • building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 62 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 1.8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially win, Than pP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated I Impact Impact Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to candidate, sensitive, or special status species caused by those projects will be -evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Delhi Sands Flower Lovina Fly(DSFLF) The site is located near an area for potential habitat for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly (DSFLF). According to the General Biological Assessment prepared by Natural Resources-Assessment, Inc. on November 12, 2014, there are no Delhi sands present on site, and the site is dominated by ruderal (weedy) plants, human activity and hardscape surfaces. This species is not present on-site. The boundary of the mapped habitat area (including the buffer area) for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly(DSFLF) is a minimum of 0.13 miles (approximately 700 feet) to the east. This 700 foot area, all of the buffer area and a portion of the habitat area between the project and Haven Avenue, north of 4th Street, has been converted into commercial development and no DSFLF habitat remains. Burrowina Owl According to the General Biological Assessment prepared by Natural Resources Assessment, Inc. on November 12, 2014, suitable nesting habitat exists for the burrowing owl. Burrows constructed by Beechey's ground squirrel (Sphermophilus beecheyi) were found on the undeveloped area of the site. Burrowing owls will frequently take over abandoned or empty structures such as ground squirrel burrows. At the time of the survey, no active owl burrows or animals were observed. The available habitat is small, surrounded by development and isolated from suitable foraging habitat for burrowing owl. NRAI does not expect burrowing owl to take up residence on the property. Other Candidate, Sensitive, or Special Status Species According to the General Biological Assessment prepared by Natural Resources Assessment, Inc. on November 12, 2014, the project site is in a region where several candidate, sensitive, or special status species such as the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, Northwestern San Diego Pocket Mouse, Los Angeles Pocket Mouse, San Diego Desert Woodrat, Western Yellow Bat, and Western Mastiff Bat could exist but conditions on the. specific project site do not exist that could support these species and the presence of these species is not expected: Plant Communities According to the General Biological Assessment prepared by Natural Resources Assessment, Inc. on November 12, 2014, the plant community on the undeveloped area of the site is ruderal(annual weeds). The mix of ruderal species at the time of the survey included Mediterranean grass, short-podded mustard and telegraph weed. The plant community on the developed area of the site is composed of non-native landscape trees and shrubs such as Chinese elm, eucalyptus and century plant. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities and no riparian habitat exists on-site due to the on-site and surrounding improvements and characteristics as described in 4.a above. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources, Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 63 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 19 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant MiUgaOon Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Impact Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site due to the on-site and surrounding improvements and characteristics as described in 4.a) above. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the • Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to federally protected wetlands caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas due to the on-site and surrounding improvements and characteristics as described in 4.a above. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. According to the General Biological Assessment prepared by Natural Resources Assessment, Inc. on November 12, 2014, no nest or nesting behavior was observed during the field survey, but the project site supports tree stands that provide nesting habitat. Due to the location of the property within an urbanized area of Rancho Cucamonga, no significant indirect impacts (noise, human activity) are expected. However, if the landscape trees will be removed as part of project construction, there may -- be direct impacts to bird species nesting in these trees. It is possible that birds are nesting on site or will be nesting at the time of construction. The following mitigation measure shall reduce the impact to less-than-significant: 1) If site clearing, tree removal, or site grading will occur during nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a breeding bird survey will be required to determine if nesting is occurring. Occupied nests will not be disturbed during -the nesting season (February 1 through August 31) unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg-laying and incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent ® survival. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 64 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Pafly With ThenIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated I Impact Im act If the biologist is not able to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season so as to avoid abandonment of the young(California Department of Fish and Wildlife 2012b). Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the Purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact(if any)to native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) There are five (5) trees within the project site but only one qualifies as a "heritage" tree according to the Tree Survey prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland on August 27, 2014. Heritage trees are subject to the City's tree preservation requirements as described in Section 17.80.050 of the Development Code. Heritage trees are defined in the Development Code as trees that meet several criteria including the following: all eucalyptus windrows [and] any tree in excess of thirty feet (30) in height and having a single trunk diameter at breast height(DBH) of twenty inches (20' or more as measured four and a half feet(4.59 from ground level and warrant consideration for preservation or relocation. The applicant proposes to remove all of these trees (Related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845) and, therefore, project implementation will result in the removal of the heritage tree. The following mitigation measure shall reduce the impact to less-than-significant. 2) The tree that is removed shall be replaced with a new tree, on a one-to-one basis, of a minimum 15-gallon size. This tree is in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000. square__.feet-.for the purpose of __- warehouse/storaae/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) Neither the City nor the SO[ are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 65 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 21 • Less Than Significant Less. Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Powin, Than pportSignnificaificay nt Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 17.18 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in • floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact(if any) to historical resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 66 Initial Study.for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 22 Less Than Significant Less pote�tialiy With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings'to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact(if any)to archeological resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County.database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last Ice Age and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to,the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 67 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 23 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su PP g ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Inco orates Inmact Im act • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the ' summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to paleontological resources, sites, and/or geologic features caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable • mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project site is located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue. The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north, east, and west, and residential development to the south in the City of Ontario. The western two-thirds of the parcel was previously developed with two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 22,500 square feet: Within the last few years there has been ongoing deconstruction/demolition activity on the property and, therefore, only the smaller of the two buildings remains. Public improvements such as the street and most associated public infrastructure are already in-place. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered'ori-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a . floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to human remains caused.by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 68 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 24 less Than Significant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Is— gn cant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) () ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-8 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) . Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) () (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: . a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault - - -- is about-2.5 miles to the northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies about 6.5 miles to the north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing MW 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to MW 7.5 earthquakes is about 18 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to MW 8.2 earthquakes, is about 20 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-sign cant Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 69 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 25 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g Significant Mtigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to geology and soils will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by • the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of'year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. b) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The site is not on a slope of 30 percent or greater, or within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand (TuB) (0 - 5 percent slopes) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to geology and sails will be evaluated and, if • necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Rev 2-26-1.3 Item L-N 70 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 26 Less Than SignificantLess Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Im act Im aet d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand (TuB) (0 - 5 percent slopes) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically stable. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater.disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will.allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park(IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the wastewater disposal requirements for those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or () (✓) 0/ . () indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an.applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? 0 ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Regulations and Significance-The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the.State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced-to 1990 levels-by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent -- below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that.GHGs endanger human health; and (2)that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CHa], nitrous oxide [N20], hydrofluorocarbons [HFCs], perfluorocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]. The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington; already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit(°F)over the next century. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 71 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 27 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyignifaWith Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy.. _ The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The • proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PM,o, PM2.s, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM,o, and PM2.s levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area.- Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to greenhouse gases generated by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Project Related Sources of GHG's - Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered • to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 72 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. , Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment that was prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in February 2013-the project would result in the following emissions of carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N20], hydrofluorocarbons [HFCs], perfluorocarbons- [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride[SF6])and would not result in the other GHG's. As seen in the tables below, the proposed project would result.in a total of 18 MTCO2eq/yr from construction activities and 190 MTCO2eq/yr for area sources and 1,202 MTCO2eq/yr for mobile sources. Total project related direct operation emission would result in 1,410 MTCO2eq/yr. Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel powered construction equipment-and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. O Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cha, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Construction greenhouse gas emissions are: Slag Terfn==.;:Comstru"etrrGree n�fio' G�Em waon$: NF °� .. ::�, CO2 CH4 N20 Total' 2015 544 0.00 0.00 546 Amortized Tota12 18 0.00 0.00 18 1: MTCO2E 2: Amortized over 30-years 3: The GHG inventory"was prepared for the project using under BAU conditions" Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment-(Table 15)(CaIEEMod Output) MIG/Ho le-Ireland,June 2014 - --- Although the emissions are less than the de facto SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT/year, the following mitigation measures,shall be implemented to further reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 73 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 29 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially with Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. .5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project-for"adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and • represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. Operational greenhouse gas emissions are: - ;: ;:, e'aitfonat Green - - house.�:Ga�:�Erritssio CO2 CH4 N20 Total' Energy 137 0 0 137 Mobile 1,202 0 0 1,202 Solid Waste 22 1 0 49 Water/Wastewater 3 0 0 4 Total 1,364 1 0 1,393 1: MTCO2E 2: The GHG inventory"was prepared for the project using under BAU conditions" Source: Air.Quality and Climate Change Assessment-(Table 16)(CaIEEMod Output) MIG/Ho le-Ireland,June 2014 The project is the construction of an industrial building of about 116,480 square feet-on a parcel of about 249,000 square feet (5.72 acres) and therefore potentially would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water • efficient landscaping; shade trees; bike racks;walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 74 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 30. Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g Signnificaificant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping; shade trees; bike racks; walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB)375. The long term operation of the project emissions will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed any of the SCAQMD's thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a significant long term impact with the following mitigation measures: 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC)materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances . • Landscape and develope site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes(LED's)for outdoor lighting. -- _ — ... . ..--....... --- 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in .compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinalstwater heaters. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 75 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 31 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PotentiWith Than pp g Significaantnt MGgafion Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The proposed project is the construction and operation of an industrial building of about 116,480 square feet. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping; shade trees; bike racks; walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools and therefore is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively • considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly(AB)32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the Purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other, parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to greenhouse gases generated by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 8.. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 76 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 32 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Poifi aWith Than PP g Signnificanntt With Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () ( ) (✓) ( ) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been,adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and,is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed industrial building is to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding sensitive receptors. No adverse impacts are expected. Development-.Code.Amendment.DRC201.4-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by, those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full .service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 77 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 33 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially wan Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact lincorporated Impact Impact State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed industrial building is to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding sensitive receptors. The redevelopment of the site will require the developer to comply with SCAQMD Rule 1403, CAL-OSHA regulations for asbestos and lead abatement and other State and .Federal regulations prior to their redevelopment and reuse of the site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials • generated by, those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) There is a school located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The nearest school to the project site, The Ontario Center (Elementary) School, is about 0.25-mile to the south at 835 N. Center Avenue in the City of Ontario. However, as noted above in 8.a and 8.b above, the proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by, those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project site is located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue. The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north, east, and west, and residential development to the south in the City of Ontario. According to the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment prepared by PIC Environmental Services. on August 21, 2014: Based on a site inspection/survey, most of the property now contains asphalt or concrete • pavement A small commercial office building remains in the southeast portion of the property. From about 1981 until 2012 the property contained a large industrial building located in the southwest portion of the property. The existing office building appears to Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 78 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 34 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than pportSignificant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated impact Impact have been constructed in about 1981 as well. From about 1981 until 1998 the property was occupied by Brooks Products. which manufactured plastic utility boxes and cover plates. Patches in the remaining pavement document historic locations of near surface drain lines and several subsurface, concrete lined. equipment foundations (pits)...PIC contacted the Brooks Products office...and verbally confirmed the subsurface vaults were constructed to support plastics manufacturing equipment. PIC observed no evidence of underground.storage tanks (USTs), clarifiers, significant surface staining or drains exhibiting stains. PiC did observe a small stockpile of accumulated wastes including paint, sealants,. and cleansers located adjacent to and north of the existing office building. Because the office building was constructed before 1980, asbestos containing construction materials (ACM) may be present onsite. PIC observed no obvious ACM. Based on a review of historical aerial photographs, agricultural cultivation is observed onsite in all photos from 1938 through 1966. By 1977, a square commercial structure was constructed in the southwest portion of the property. By 1989, the square building had been enlarged to the north and the existing office building had been constructed. Exterior areas were paved and used for equipment and vehicle storage. Similar features were observed in the 1994 photo. By 2005, exterior.equipment storage was no longer evident. Instead, only vehicle storage is observed onsite. Similar features are observed in subsequent photos through 2012. By 2014, the former, large, industrial building had been demolished. The aerial photo study indicates no obvious environmental impairments on the subject property. PIC observed no historic evidence of underground storage tanks, oil wells, landfills or rock quarries on the subject property. In conclusion, PIC observed no evidence of Recognized Environmental Concerns (environmental impairments)during the site inspection. Project implementation will result in the removal of the remaining building, paving, and associated improvements (unless otherwise required to remain in-place)that were used to conduct the previous operations on the property to allow the construction of an industrial building of about 116,480 square for warehouse/distribution purposes. The impact will be less-than-significant. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area.- Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by, those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The site is located within an Airport Land.Use Plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located about one mile north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Per FAR Part 77, Subpart C, any object with a height of 200 feet above the established airport elevation would be an obstruction to air navigation. The airport is at an Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 79 Initial Study for City-of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 35 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially with ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact established elevation of 925 feet above sea level (ASL). The proposed building has a pad elevation of about 1,038 feet (maximum) and, when combined with the overall height of the building of between 36 feet and 40 feet (maximum), will have a height of about 153 feet above the established airport elevation. No impact is anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to airport land use plans caused by those projects will .be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located about 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access .and evacuation routes to existing development. The site has access to existing roadways. • The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to emergency access plans and evacuation routes caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if.necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does • not preclude the review.by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to the exposure.of people or structures to Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 80 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page.36 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated impact Impact wildfire risk caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (✓) ( ) _( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) ... ---.-.Place within a.100-year flood. hazard. area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) () (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 81 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 37 ® Less Than Significant Less Issues and'Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB),Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NO[) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs)to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. • A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. in September 2014, which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels.include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants - - - - - - entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and • implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 82 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 38 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potent;ally With Than pp gftiSignificant Mitigation Significant No Impact lincorporated I Impact Impact include the following measures at a minimum.: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from-the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. in September 2014 to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Post- Construction Operational. 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. in September 2014 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these-areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the-aurpose of - warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted. for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the Citys water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 83 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 39 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to groundwater supplies or groundwater recharge caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. ® All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to drainage patterns that results in erosion caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed • 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 84 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 40 _ Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact linctirporated Impact Im act warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review-by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to drainage patterns that results in flooding caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to existing or planned stormwater drainage systems caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site will be undergoing significant redevelopment; therefore, the project is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: Grading Activities: 1 Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management'Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural 'measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Stone Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargees Identification Rev 2-26-13 - Item L-N 85 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review.DRC2014-00566 Page 4l • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a. floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the • Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to housing due to flood hazards caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to flood flow patterns caused by those projects will- be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed • 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet.in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 86 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 42 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Im aet warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to flooding caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose-deep canyons--_ . were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man=made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-'significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. No adverse impacts are expected. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a. floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park(IP) Districts. When the-applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue. The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north, east, and west, and residential development to the south in the City of Ontario. The proposal is for the construction of an industrial building of about 116,480 square feet on a parcel of about 249,000 square feet (5.72 acres). The western two-thirds of the parcel was previously developed with two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 22,500 square feet. Within the last few years there has been ongoing deconstruction/demolition activity on the property and., therefore, only the smaller of the two buildings remains. The site will be developed with an industrial building that will be similar to the newer buildings in the industrial areas of the City. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment.DRC2014=00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed .50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in Rev 2-26-13 Item L--N 87 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 43 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to established communities caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project site land use designation is Industrial Park. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or. SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is for the construction of an industrial building of about 116,480 square feet on a parcel of about 249,000 square feet (5.72 acres). The western two-thirds of the parcel was previously developed with two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 22,500 square feet. Within the last few years there has been ongoing deconstruction/demolition activity on the property and, therefore, only the smaller of the two buildings remains. The site will be developed with an industrial building that will be similar to the newer buildings in the industrial areas of the City. The development of the site will be consistent with the land use designations as described in the Development Code and General Plan. The minimum building, parking lot, and wall • setbacks; dock and storage area screening; and landscape coverage are consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (1P) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact(if any)to any land use plan, policy, or regulation caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site isnot within an area of sensitive biological resources but is located near an area for potential habitat for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly (DSFLF). According to the General Biological Assessment prepared by Natural Resources Assessment, Inc. on November 12, 2014, there are no Delhi sands present on site (Figure 3), and the site is dominated by ruderal (weedy) plants, human activity and hardscape surfaces. This species is not present on site. The boundary of the mapped habitat area (including the buffer area) for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSFLF) is a minimum of 0.13 miles(approximately 700 feet) to the east(Figure 4). This 700 foot area, all of the buffer area and a portion of the habitat area between the project and Haven Avenue, north of 4"' Street, has been converted into commercial development and no DSFLF habitat remains. Therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or • endangered species of plants or animals. The western two-thirds of the parcel was previously developed with two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 22,500 square feet. Within the last few years there has been ongoing deconstruction/demolition Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 88 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567.and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 44 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentialy With Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Im act activity-on the property and, therefore, only the smaller of the two buildings remains. The site will be developed with an industrial building that will be similar to the newer buildings in the industrial areas of the City. The project site is bound on the north by industrial office buildings. To the east is a property that is partially developed with a building of about 13,000 square feet. To the west is a vacant property while to the south, on the opposite side of 4th Street, is an apartment complex(Centre Club Apartments) in the City of Ontario. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the ouroose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to any conservation plan caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storaae/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to mineral resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site;therefore, there is no impact. Development Code,Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the ouroose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 89 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 45 • less Than Significant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wltn Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to mineral resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or:generation of noise levels in ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) excess of standards.established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 • miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. The project site is located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue. The street frontage along 4th Street is about 419 feet. The principal source of noise that would impact the project site is traffic. Generally, warehouse/distribution operations are not sensitive to noise impacts. The office use associated with such operations would be the most sensitive to noise impacts. However, due-to the-concrete wall construction of the buildings and the setbacks between the buildings and the street, noise impacts will be less than significant. Noise from the site will most likely be generated by truck traffic and dock area activities— all other activities will be conducted within the buildings. The dock area will be screened from the street by a concrete tilt-up wall of a minimum 8 feet in height. There are no sensitive receptors immediately adjacent to the project site. The nearest noise sensitive area is an apartment complex (Centre Club Apartments) located to the south of the project site, on the opposite side of 4th Street, in the City of Ontario. The nearest apartment unitibuilding is about 150 feet from the perimeter of the project. Per the Noise Study prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in August 2014, operationally, the proposed project • will result in periodic landscaping and other occasional noise generating activities. These activities are common in industrial uses and do not represent a substantial increase in periodic noise in consideration that the project site is located in an industrialized area. Traffic noise levels will not increase 3 dBA or more as a result of the proposed Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 90 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 46 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyignifWith Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact project...noise levels are expected to increase by a maximum of 0.8 dBA CNEL, as a result of the project, at the industrial and commercial use to the east of the project. However, because the project site in its existing condition is mostly vacant with an existing 5,000-square foot vacant building, addition of the proposed warehouse will decrease roadway noise from 4th Street at the industrial uses.to the north. In addition, as discussed previously, increase in traffic generated noise will only be perceptible to the community if traffic levels double on any roadway. The proposed project will not double traffic on any of the surrounding roadways. . Therefore, the project-related noise increases on 4th Street will not be perceptible and impacts will be less than significant. In any event, the mitigation measures listed below will further reduce exterior and interior noise levels: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. . 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. The measures listed under 12.d also will further reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to noise caused by those projects will be --evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The proposed industrial building is to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. The City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed building; hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby uses is expected. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the neighboring sensitive receptors. There are no sensitive receptors immediately adjacent to the project site. The nearest noise sensitive area is an apartment complex (Centre Club Apartments) located to the south of the project site, on the opposite side of 4th Street, in the City of Ontario. The nearest apartment unit/building is about 150 feet from the perimeter of the project. Per the Noise Study prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in August 2014, construction of the project does not require rock blasting, pile driving, or the use of a jack hammer, but will use a vibratory roller, large bulldozer, and loaded trucks. All receptors will experience barely perceptible vibration from construction of the proposed Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 91 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 47 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially with ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mdigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact project. Furthermore, these construction activities will be limited to the hours of 7.00 pm to 8:00 pm Mondays through Saturdays. Limiting construction activities to daytime hours will reduce the vibration impacts to adjacent residences because, generally, residents will be working during the day so-residences to the south will be vacant when construction activities are occurring. With regard to long-term operational impacts, activities associated with the project will not result in any vibration-related impacts to adjacent or on-site properties. In any event, the measures listed under 12.d will further reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to vibrations caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Noise from the site will most likely be generated by truck traffic and dock area activities — all other • activities will be conducted within the buildings. The dock area will be screened from the street by a concrete tilt-up wall of a minimum 8 feet in height. There are no sensitive receptors immediately adjacent to the project site. The nearest noise sensitive area is an apartment complex (Centre Club Apartments) located to the south of the project site, on the opposite side of 4th Street, in the City of Ontario. The nearest apartment.unit/building is about 150 feet from the perimeter of the project. Per the Noise Study prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in August 2014, traffic noise levels will not increase 3 d8A or more as a result of the proposed project...noise levels are expected to increase by a maximum of 0.8 d8A CNEL, as a result of the project, at the industrial and commercial use to the east of the project. However, because the project site in its existing condition is mostly vacant with an existing 5,000-square foot vacant building,. addition of the proposed warehouse will decrease roadway noise from 4th Street at the industrial uses to the north. In addition, as discussed previously, increase in traffic generated noise will only be perceptible to the community-if traffic levels double on any roadway. The proposed project will not double traffic on any of the surrounding roadways. Therefore, the project-related noise increases - . -- on 4th Street will not be perceptible and impacts will be less than significant. In any event, the measures listed in 12.a will mitigate the short-term noise impacts to a level of less than significant. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to increased ambient noise levels caused by • those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 92 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 48 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inca orated Impact impact d) The General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.12)indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays,'including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level. of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) Stationary construction noise sources such as generators or pumps must be located at least 100 feet from sensitive land uses, as feasible, or at maximum distance when necessary to complete work near sensitive land uses. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 4) *Construction staging areas must be located as far from noise sensitive land uses as feasible. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development,or designee during routine inspections. 5) Throughout construction; the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with included noise attenuating devices and are properly maintained. This mitigation measure shall be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 6) Idling equipment must be turned off when not in use..This mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development,or designee during routine inspections. 7) Equipment must be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. This" mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measure shall then be required: Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 93 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 49 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and SU ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 8) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. - Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the Purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The site is located within an airport land use plan and is one mile from a public airport. • The Project is located approximately one mile north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Per the Noise Study prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in August 2014, the project site is within the airport influence area; however, according to the Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, the noise impact zones do not extend to the project site. The project site will not be exposed to excessive aircraft noise levels. No impact is anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the'City, the impact (if any) due to excessive noise levels generated by airports in the vicinity of those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project.- a) roject.a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) () (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? • b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 94 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 50 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Im act Impact C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) -1 the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No significant impacts are anticipated._ Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to population growth caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The western two-thirds of the parcel was previously developed with two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 22,500 square feet. Within the last few years there has been ongoing deconstruction/demolition activity on the property and, therefore, only the smaller of the two buildings remains — there are no existing housing units on the project site. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact-(if any) to existing housing caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary,the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) - The western two-thirds of the parcel was previously developed with two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 22,500 square feet. Within the last few years there has been ongoing deconstruction/demolition activity on the property and, therefore, only the smaller of the two buildings remains — there are no existing housing units on the project site. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the `impact (if any) of the displacement of people caused by those Rev 2-26-13 item L-N 95 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 51 ® Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) C) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The project site is located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue and • would be served by Fire Station #4 at 11297 Jersey Boulevard located about 1.5 miles to the northeast of the site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is.not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located. on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to fire protection services caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation- measures will be implemented. - b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of • warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to police protection services caused by those Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 96 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and.Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 52 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Im act Im aet projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed . 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the: impact (if any) to schools caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary,.the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is Golden Oak Park at 9345 Golden Oak Road located approximately one mile west to northwest of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code'Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any)to parks caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public.facilities.--The-site is in a developed area,- currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand, but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less-than-significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 97 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 53 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact 11incorporated Impact Impact floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact(if any)to other public facilities caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) require the constriction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The • nearest park is Golden Oak Park at 9345 Golden Oak Road located approximately one mile west-northwest of the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review.by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact(if any)to recreational facilities caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) Refer to 15.a above. .Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 98 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 54 Less Than Significant Less PoteIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant With Than PP g Significant Mtigation Significant No Impact Incorporated I actImpact 16. TRANS PORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited 'to" intersections; streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) () (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d)- Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) The proposed project is the construction and operation of an industrial building of about 116,480 square feet. Per the to the Traffic Impact Assessment prepared by Linscott, Law 8t Greenspan on April 29, 2014, implementation of the proposed project will generate 529 weekday daily PCE trips, 47 weekday AM peak hour PCE trips(38 inbound, 9 outbound), and.47-.weekday.PM.peak hour.PCE trips (12 inbound, 35 outbound). As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General. Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 99 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC201,4-00566 Page 55 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant With Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to the performance of the transportation/traffic circulation system caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) Per the to the Traffic Impact Assessment prepared by Linscott, Law&Greenspan on April 29, 2014, will generate 529 weekday daily PCE trips, 47 weekday AM peak hour PCE trips (38 inbound, 9 outbound), and 47 weekday PM peak hour PCE trips(12 inbound, 35 outbound). A qualitative assessment of the addition of 47 AM peak hour trips and 47 PM peak hour trips, when distributed through the project vicinity, would result in essentially no more than approximately 35 AM or PM peak hour trips at the...intersections...of Hermosa Avenue and 4th Street, and Haven Avenue and 4th Street [located in the Project vicinity]. Using the "100 trip threshold" criteria as indicated in the SANBAG Congestion Management Program (CMP) as the basis for requiring the preparation of a traffic impact analysis, the proposed Project would not require the preparation of a traffic impact analysis or comprehensive traffic impact assessment. As a result, based on the.traffic generation potential of the proposed 4th Street Industrial Project, the proposed maximum • 120,000 SF warehouse building will not significantly impact the surrounding transportation system. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion . Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. ---._._...__..-...-._.. . Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction anduse of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to a congestion management program caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. • c) Located about one mile north of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 100 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 56 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No. Impact incorporated Impact IrMact Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not.permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the.City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact(if any)to air traffic patterns caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements(curb, gutter, and sidewalk)along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) of transportation design features associated with those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon.completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does ... _.. not preclude the.review by. the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are_submitted for review by the City, the impact(if any) to emergency access caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the.applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) The design of the project includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction including bicycle racks at the office area, preferential parking for cadvanpools, pedestrian connections to the public sidewalks, etc. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 101 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2O14-00567 and Development Review DRC2O14-00566 Page 57 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary,the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or • are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2O14-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a ® building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 102 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 58 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Impact review by the City, the impact (if any) to wastewater treatment requirements caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency ,at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated.- Development nticipated.Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area.. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to wastewater treatment facilities caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in -- floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose .of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to storm water drainage facilities caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d). _ The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project._ No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water supplies caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. D ' Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 103 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 59 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to wastewater treatment capacity caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed • 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to landfill capacity caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. No impacts are anticipated. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a ... ...._.. .__..___ building with. a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to solid waste statutes and regulations caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. • Rev 2-26-13 - Item L-N 104 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 60 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact In orated Impact Impact 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant. or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) () (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The project site is located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue. The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. The site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals. The western two-thirds of the parcel was previously developed with two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 22,500 square feet, and associated surface improvements such as asphalt storage/parking areas and landscaping comprised of ground cover and numerous mature trees along 4th Street and along the perimeter. These buildings were most likely constructed in the early 1980's. Within the last few years there has been ongoing deconstruction/demolition activity on the property and, therefore, only the smaller of the two buildings, the paving, and the landscaping remain. The eastern one-third of parcel is vacant and is dominated by short grasses. Development of the site for the subject project will result in the removal.of.all the_.... identified improvements. The project site is bound on the north by industrial office -buildings: To the east is a property that is partially developed with a building of about 13,000 square feet. To the west is a vacant property, while to the south, on the opposite side of 4th Street, is an apartment complex (Centre Club Apartments) in the City of Ontario. Based on previous development, surrounding development, and the construction of infrastructure in the immediate vicinity, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. According to the General Biological Assessment prepared by Natural Resources Assessment, Inc. on November 12, 2014, the site is located near an area for potential habitat for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly (DSFLF). There are no Delhi sands present on-site, and this species is not present on site. Nesting habitat exists for the burrowing owl but no active owl burrows or animals were observed. The available habitat is small, surrounded by development and isolated from suitable foraging habitat and, therefore, burrowing owls are not expected on the property. The project site is in a region where several other candidate, sensitive, or special status species could exist but Rev 2-26=13 Item L-N 105 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 61 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: FS. Y with Than With Significant No Inco orated Im act Im act conditions on the project site do not exist that could support these species and the presence of these species is not expected. The plant community on the undeveloped area of the site is comprised of a variety of annual weeds. The plant community on the developed area of the site is composed of non-native landscape trees and shrubs such as Chinese elm, eucalyptus and century plant. No nest or nesting behavior was observed during the field survey, but there are trees within the project site that provide nesting habitat. Due to the location of the property within an urbanized area of the City, no significant indirect impacts (noise, human activity) are expected. However, as these trees will be removed, there may be direct impacts to bird species nesting in these trees. It is possible that birds are nesting on site or will be nesting at the time of construction. The mitigation measures listed in the Biological section of this Initial Study will reduce the impacts to the nesting activities of native bird species and trees to less-than-significant. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park(IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of _warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact(if any)to biological and cultural resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be • implemented. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the;City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section . 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the cumulative impacts (if any) caused by those projects will be • evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 106 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00566 and.Development Code Amendment DRC2014 -00567 Page 62 C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study.identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial.Park(IP)District, the construction.and use of a building with a floor -area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the environmental effects caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho. Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive and/or have been attached (on a CD)to this document for review: (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027; Certiflied October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR - (Certified September 19, 1981) (T) Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment (MIG/Hogle-Ireland, June 2014) (T) General Biological Assessment (Natural Resources Assessment, Inc., November 12, 2014) (T) Noise Study (MIG/Hogle-Ireland, August 2014) (T) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (PIC Environmental Services,August 21, 2014) Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 107 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00566 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 Page 63 • (T) Traffic Impact Assessment (Linscott, Law&Greenspan, April 29, 2014) (T) Water Quality Management Plan (Fuscoe Engineering, Inc., September 2014) Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 108 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00566 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 Page 64 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's.Signature: Date: Print Name and Title: Rev 2-26-13 Item L-N 109 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components- This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in --performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to.the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department ® 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Item L-N 110 Mitigation Monitoring Program Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature.and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. .The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department.- The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be.approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. - Item L-N 111 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART 111) Project File No.: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Applicant: Jason Korengold, Turner Real Estate Investments Initial Study Prepared by: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Date: December 3, 2014 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for. Implementing Action. for Monitoring Fre uenc Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance x.:.; .. 1. a :. ,. tv.• a.•..P�-'. .,. ...c.:>.. -,s•.. "r x:yY=,.:, _.:F.' :bt+,• --F-7-7 ;{. Short Term(Construction)Emissions 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the project PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 proponent shall submit, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, a Coating Restriction Plan (CRP), consistent with .South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) guidelines and a letter agreeing to include in any construction contracts and/or subcontracts a requirement that 3 the contractors adhere to the CRP. The CRP z measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of City Building Director. These may N include the following: o That volatile organic compounds (VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 100 for interior applications. o That volatile organic compounds (VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 100 g/1 for exterior applications. This measure shall conform to the performance standard that emissions of volatile organic compounds from application of interior or exterior coatings shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The CRP shall specify use of High-Volume, Low Pressure (HVLP)spray guns for application of coatings. Page 1 of 14 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Im lementin Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 2) All construction equipment shall be maintained in PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 3) : Prior to the issuance of any-grading permits, the PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality. Management District (SCAQMD)as well as City Planning staff. Z 4) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 w performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray: 5) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance BO B Review of plans A/C 2 standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 6) All construction equipment shall comply with BO C Review of plans A/C '2/4 SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 roads. Phase grading to prevent the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Page 2 of 14 • Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for -ImplementingAction for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Com Hance • Schedule activities to minimize the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 amounts .of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering ractices. • Sweep_streets according to a schedule BO C During construction A 4 established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high BO C During construction A 4 winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard BO C During Construction A 4 ratio on soils haul trucks or cover 3 payloads using tarps or other suitable r Z means. 7) The site shall be treated with water or other B0 C During construction A 4 A soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional' Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PMlo) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 8) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 9) The construction contractor shall utilize electric BO C Review of plans A/C 4 or clean alternative' fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 10)The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Page 3 of 14 Mitigation Measures No.l Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance Long Term Emissions 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy PD C Review of plans A/C 2/3 vehicles and shuttle services. 12) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and PD C Review of plans A/C 2/3 reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 13) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant PD C Review of plans A/C 2/3 species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 14) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials PD C Review of plans A/C 2/3 and tree planting programs to.comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 15) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post BO C Review of plans A 4 signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 3 minutes). r 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall PD C Review of plans A/C 2/3 z designate preferential parking for vanpools. i 17) All industrial and commercial site tenants with PD C Review of plans D 2/3 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in. conspicuous areas. 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with PD C Reviewof plans D 2/3 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably . feasible. ........... - i,.. :sem;:.,..r ,tsep- u; 'r -- '�: '1 ' ''�-y",'g�^r��� ,:`sJ.. u5>M1" .xa � ii"`•' - s!�1 ': a;, =4a WNW '..- `'� 'iL°;�.'',r .a f . - :.� '�� vE's�� 9 0.�•Sed. ..k .. ....9:: "ac:i y r 1) If site clearing, tree removal, or site grading will PD B Prior to construction D 2 occur during nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a breeding bird survey will be required to determine if nesting'is occurring. Occupied nests will not be disturbed during the nesting season (February 1 through August 31) unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that.either a the adult birds Page 4 of 14 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance have not begun egg-laying and incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. 2) The tree that is removed shall be replaced with PD B Prior to construction D 2 a new tree, on a one-to-one basis, of a minimum 15-gallon size. This tree is in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. + ..S ..h.. -.l p.+P 'r.N• - '.7,. ;.IN - 1.:RI:-::• .•T'sT._ 'I?t,:S•". rb• its (' :9: r•,;5'' {.. .,. .t -•,.. _ i's'_:t.i.' .,r d:. _ r Section,5 •C. tur.•a±R uro s, �-:�:w. ..,._ ;a:: ,�:• �•.. ,. �. ..t...; :•s: ';� , '���i••:�"-C.� k. 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Z G Enact interim measures to protect PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint. Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. O Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with P/D B/C Review of A/D Section 21083.2 Archeological Plans/Report During resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse Construction project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources including, but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park Page 5 of 14 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for implementing Action for Monitorin Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources PD C Review of report AID 3/4 management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (Le. plant or. PD B Review of report AID 4 animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them .for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific 3 recommendations regarding further mitigation z measures (i.e., paleontological. monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation 4 monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained PD B Review of report AID 4 and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the. interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area BO B/C Review of report AID 4 being cleared or graded, :divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all PD D Review of report D 3 recovered fossils for documentation in Page 6 of 14 . • Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for -ImplementingAction for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). m Submit summary report to City of PD D Review of report D 3 Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Section 6—Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept BO C During construction A 4 according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may r vary depending upon the time of year of Z construction. a, 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when BO C During construction A 4 wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMlo emissions. Section 7—Greenhouse Gas.Emissions Short Term(Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that BO C During construction A 4 assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. Page 7 of 14 Mitigation Measures No.! Responsible .Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 2) The construction contactor shall select BO C During construction A 4 construction equipment based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more BO C . During construction A 4 than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be BO C During construction A ' 4 utilized in lieu of gasoline- ori diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to BO C During construction A 4 .interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be BO C During construction A 4 supported and encouraged for construction crew. 3 Long Term(Operational) GHG Emissions z 1) Construction and Building materials shall be BO A During Construction C 2 produced and/or manufactured locally. Use " "Green Building Materials" such;as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC)materials. 2) Design all buildings to. exceed California BO A During Construction C 2 Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: Increased insulation. Limit air leakage through the structure Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping Page 8 of 14 • • • Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for -implementingAction for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date iinitials Non-Compliance • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use r reclaimed water. z o • Design-building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and CE A Review of plans C 2 demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Page 9 of 14 i Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for implementing Action for Monitoring Fre ue cy Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) ' An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 included in the Grading Plan, and:implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control.on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing ! of grading and construction to minimize soil ; exposure to rainy, periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall :be included to 3 ensure that any erosion which does occur r either on-site or off-site as 'a result of this Z project will be corrected through a remediation N or restoration program within.a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, BO -B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Fuscoe Engineering,, Inc. In September 2014 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping.plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of - - Page 10 of 1 • Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading Activities 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for r New Development and Redevelopment z adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in N June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and Page 11 of 14 i i Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Fre4uency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. 'No loading and unloading activities . including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. Interior 3) Construction or grading shall not take place. BO C During construction A 4 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any 3 3 time on Sunday or a national holiday. z 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not BO C During construction A 4 N exceed the standards specified in W Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official. within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) Stationary construction noise sources such as generators or pumps must be located at least 100 feet from sensitive land uses, as feasible, Page 12 of 14 • Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance or at maximum distance when necessary to complete work near sensitive land uses. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 6) Construction staging areas must be located PO/BO C During construction A 4/7 as far from noise sensitive land uses as feasible. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 7) Throughout construction, the contractor shall PO/BO C During construction A 4/7 ensure all construction equipment is equipped with included noise attenuating devices and are properly maintained. This mitigation measure shall be periodically monitored by z the Director of Community and Economic N Development, or designee during routine a' inspections. 8) Idling equipment must be turned off when not PO/BO C During construction A 4/7 in use. This mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 9) Equipment must be maintained so that PO/BO C During construction A 4/7 vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. This mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 10) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place POW C During construction A 4/7 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the Page 13 of 14 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monito ring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations .:. :......, v .. ...... ... ...._.<Yy.a^ ..:. .. .u:( H M. \:'. Sti` ..5.. 7 &ik'`DrA'. ...p._. ... •. _.. - _..•. >ry s., ..t r. . h. P. ., iFf...: ✓i34...... tPi''.;ES?? .F:'�e �t'A": .r_q °ls�d iri2'1`7 v— ';C•.V�.Y'�.. 'r°,.'._�`• m?Y�'b.. 'r> ^... [}^ } y .'L ti� A Ya t.r ..y,.....;y.. ,Ti:f• ;,F.. {� kbi. . x Y'}g. °L'r •<T'. r ....y�.}:3.^. . . 1.. w a.� r 3::a3Y £. �" �'vs%�x�'�-Y � v �'• ,cu':�,�•'�'.�s" ` ,r CDD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD-Planning Director or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhol&Grading or Building Permit CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan-Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO-Building Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating 5-Retain'Deposit or Bonds FC-Fire Chief or designee 6-Revoke CUP. 7-Citation 3 r Z ro in i i i Page 14 of 14 • RESOLUTION NO. 15-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00567, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS IN EXCESS OF 50,000 SQUARE FEET ON SELECT PARCELS LOCATED WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. Turner Real Estate Investments filed an application for the approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of January 2015, the Planning Commission'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. ® B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing January 28, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. The Industrial Park (IP) Districts are generally located between Foothill Boulevard, Rochester Avenue/Interstate 15, Hermosa Avenue, and 4th Street; and b. Logistics buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet and logistics activities within a building in excess of 50,000 square feet are classified as "Wholesale, Storage, and:Distribution — Medium"; and C. The Development Code currently does not permit "Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Medium" in the Industrial Park (IP) Districts. Although the Code permits "Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Light" in the Industrial Park (IP) District; such activity is limited to buildings of less than 50,000 square feet in floor area; and • d. In order to maximize the'development opportunity of the project site, the applicant has submitted a Development Code Amendment to allow "Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Medium". If approved, it would permit the construction and operation of logistics buildings with a floor area greater than 50,000 square feet in the Industrial Park (IP) District; Item L-N 126 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-11 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00567 —TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 2 e. The section of the Code that will be amended is Table 17..30.030-1 and will read as shown in Exhibit O of the Staff Report and in the attached exhibit; and f. The amendment will not change any of the technical standards (floor area ratio, building setbacks, parking requirements, landscape coverage, etc.), design standards (architecture, site design, etc.), allowable land uses (except logistics), and/or performance standards (noise, odors, hazardous materials, etc.) that currently apply within the Industrial Park (IP) District; and g. The performance standards that apply to the Industrial Park (IP) District are the most restrictive of the performance standards.that apply to the industrial district and h. The proposed amendment will apply to all parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) District except the parcels within the Haven Avenue Overlay District and parcels within, or partly within, 500 feet of the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way; and i. This request is in response to a proposed industrial building of about 116,480 square feet on a parcel of about 249,000 square feet (5.72 acres) in the Industrial Park (IP) District located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue -APN: 0210-0371-02; and j. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 conforms to and does not conflict. with the General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2. above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Development Code Amendment.does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development of the surrounding area; and b. The proposed Development Code Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and c. The proposed Development Code Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts. and information contained in the proposed Mitigated-Negative; Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the.City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there wouldbe no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Item L-N 127 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-11 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00567—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS • January 28, 2015 Page 3 b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. • 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 as shown in Attachment A and the attached Standard Conditions and incorporated herein. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman _ ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning • Commission held on the 28th day of January 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: Item L-N 128 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-11 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00567 —TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES:.-_COMMISSIONERS: ..COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item L-N 129 Article 111, Chapter 17.30 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Land Use/Zoningv _ g x x a v v v v .� O District > _j2 2 . O Z O v U) tY p — O = O x U. Recycling Facility, Processing N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Recycling Facility, Scrap and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Dismantling Facility Research and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N Development Storage, Personal Storage Facility N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Storage Warehouse N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C C C N N N N Storage Yard N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution— N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N Heavy Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution— N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P N N N N Light Wholesale, Storage, • and Distribution— N N N N N N N N N N N N N N -N- P P P N N N N Medium x(12) Table Notes: Delete "(9)" and add "(12)" (1) See additional regulations for second dwelling units in Chapter 17.100. Change to "P" (2) See additional regulations for home occupations in Chapter 17.92. (3) See additional regulations for mobile homes in Chapter 17.96. (4) See Additional regulations for animal keeping in Chapter 17.88. (5) Utility facilities and infrastructure involving hazardous or volatile gas and/or liquid pipeline development require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. (6) See additional regulations for adult entertainment businesses in Chapter 17.86.Adult-oriented businesses are not permitted west of Haven Avenue. (7) See additional regulations for special regulated uses in Chapter 17.102. (8) See additional regulations for drive-in and drive-through facilities in Chapter 17.90. (9) Not permitted within 300 feet of residentially zoned property. (10) See additional regulations for wind energy systems in Chapter 17.76. (11) Family Day Care Home—Large requires approval of a Large Family Day Care Permit,not a Conditional Use Permit. Add Table Note #12 here (see below) Section 17.30.040 Other Allowed Use Provisions In addition to the allowed use provisions listed in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District), additional allowed use provisions are described in the following articles and chapters of this Title. A. Specific Use Requirements.Article V(Specific Use Requirements) identifies several use types that have special land use and/or development requirements.Some of these use types have special requirements or regulations established by state or federal law and others have special requirements based on local issues, priorities, and preferences. Use regulations in Article V are intended to supplement the allowed use • (12) "Warehouse, Storage, and Distribution - Medium" is not permitted on any parcel that is located within, or partly within, 500 feet of the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. 17.30-10 ATTACHMENT A Item L-N 130 Conditions of Approval RANCHO Community Development Department CUCAMONGN- Project#: DRC2014-00567 CEQA2014-00025 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG 111 N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Project Type: Development Code Amendment CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its = - - agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such.. approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. www.City&RC.us Printed:1/15/2015 Item L-N 131 RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014- 00566, A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING OF ABOUT 116,480 SQUARE FEET ON A PARCEL OF ABOUT 249,000 SQUARE FEET(5.72 ACRES) IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DISTRICT LOCATED AT 10220 4TH STREET ABOUT 1,600 FEET WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0210-0371-02.. A. Recitals. 1. Turner Real Estate Investments filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2014-00566 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of January 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 28, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue; and b. The property has an area of about 249,000 square feet (5.72 acres) and is about 415 feet (east-west) by about 601 feet (north-south); and C. The western two-thirds of the property was previously developed with two(2)buildings with a combined floor area of about 22,500 square feet, and associated surface improvements such as asphalt storage/parking areas and landscaping comprised of ground cover and numerous mature trees along 4th Street and along the perimeter; and d. The City's records are incomplete regarding these buildings but based on the information that is available, these buildings were most likely constructed in the late 1970's or early 1980's. Within the last few years there has been ongoing deconstruction/demolition activity on the property and,therefore, only the smaller of the two buildings,the paving, and the landscaping remain. The eastern one-third of the parcel is vacant and is dominated by short grasses. Development of the site for the subject project will result in the removal of all the identified improvements; and • Item L-N 132 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28; 2015 Page 2 e. The project site is bound on the north by industrial office buildings. To the east is a property that is partially developed with a building of about 13,000 square feet. To the west is a vacant property while to the south,on the opposite side of 4th Street,is an apartment complex(Centre Club Apartments)in the City of Ontario; and f. The zoning of the property and all properties to the north, east, and west is Industrial Park (IP) District. The zoning of the property to the south, in the City of Ontario, is Urban Residential —Ontario Center Specific Plan; and g. The applicant proposes to construct an industrial building of 116,480 square feet; and h. As the building has a floor area that is in excess of 50,000 square feet, activities within a ... building of the proposed size are classified as "Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Medium". The Development Code currently does not permit "Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Medium", and the corresponding buildings for such uses, in the Industrial Park(IP) District. The Code does permit"Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Light". However, the corresponding buildings for such uses are limited to less than 50,000 square feet in floor area; and i. In order to maximize the development opportunity of the project site,. the applicant has submitted Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 to allow"Wholesale,Storage,and Distribution— Medium"which, if approved,would permit the construction and operation of the proposed logistics building; and j. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt-up construction. The basic layout of the building will be typical for warehouse buildings. The primary(or long)axis for the building will be aligned east- west north-south. The offices area will be located at the southeast comer of the building. There will be a dock loading/storage area with 18 dock doors located on the east side of the building; and k: The parking requirement for the project,based on the proposed mix of office and warehouse floor areas in the proposed building, is 76 parking stalls; the project will have 76 parking stalls. The trailer parking requirement, based on a ratio of one stall per dock door, is 18 parking stalls;the project will have 18 parking stalls; and I. The proposed building will have a floor area of 116,480 square feet and the project site has an area of approximately 249,000 square feet. The calculated FAR for the project will be approximately 46.7 percent. Per Chapter 2, Figure LU-2 Land Use Plan of the General Plan, the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) in the Industrial Park (IP) land use category is 60 percent; and m. A review and request for approval of land uses are not included in this application, and- n. nd n. This application is in conjunction with Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code(subject to the approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567),and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct an industrial building of 116,480 square feet. -The underlying General Plan designation is Industrial Park. Item L-N 133 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 3 b. The proposed project,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties to the north, east, and west is Industrial Park(IP) District. The zoning of the property to the south, in the City of Ontario, is Urban Residential—Ontario Center Specific Plan; C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, except maximum building floor area, for which the applicant has submitted a Development Code Amendment(related file: DRC2014-00567) in order to allow the floor area to be greater than 50,000 square feet. The proposed development otherwise complies with all other standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City including building and parking setbacks,average landscape depth,floor area ratio, parking,dock and storage area screening, landscape coverage, site planning, and architecture. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA • Guidelines,the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination,a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter,the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings and prior to the approving Development Review DRC2014-00566,the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. _..__..._ ..____. _... . ._ .. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those • documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909)477-2750. Item L-N 134 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 4 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the project proponent shall submit, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, a Coating Restriction Plan (CRP), consistent with South Coast Air-Quality Management District (SCAQMD) guidelines and a letter agreeing to include in any construction contracts and/or subcontracts a requirement that the contractors adhere to the CRP. The CRP measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of City Building Director. These may include the following: ® That volatile organic compounds(VOC)of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 100 for interior applications. ■ That volatile organic compounds(VOC)of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 100 g/I for exterior applications. This measure shall conform to the. performance standard that emissions of volatile organic compounds from application of interior or exterior coatings shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The CRP shall specify use of High-Volume, Low Pressure (HVLP) spray guns for application of coatings. 2) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized,or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 4) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 5) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. Item L-N 135 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 ® Page 5 6) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. ® 0 Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 7) The site shall be treated with water.or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB])daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 8) Chemical soil-stabilizers(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 9) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. - -- - - - - 10) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 12) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 13) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water • consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. Item L-N 136 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566-TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 6 14) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 15) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 17) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both. bus and.Metro.link-schedules in conspicuous areas. 18) - All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be._ required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. Biological Resources 1) If site clearing, tree removal, or site grading will occur during nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a breeding bird survey will be required to determine if nesting is occurring.Occupied nests will not be disturbed during the nesting season (February 1 through August 31.) unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg-laying and incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. 2) The tree that is removed shall be replaced with a new tree, on a one-to-one basis, of a minimum 15-gallon size. This tree is in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or -significant modification Without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public approximately the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, Item L-N 137 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 7 ® important, and unique prehistoric resources including, but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor,trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert • earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. Item L-N 138 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 8 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-or diesel- powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions _ 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored"cool" roofs and cool pavements Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. Item L-N 139 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566 —TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 9 • 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets,dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits,the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) • specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b)An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction,to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. in September 2014 to • reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Item L-N 140 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566 —TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 10 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Construction Activities: 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the. applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits,the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction.. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at -60dB or less during the hours of 10:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers., building materials, garbage cans, or.other similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m.and - 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D,as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities Item L-N 141 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 • Page 11 shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) Stationary construction noise sources such as generators or pumps must be located at least 100 feet from sensitive land uses, as feasible, or at maximum distance when necessary to complete work near sensitive land uses. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 6) Construction staging areas must be located as far from noise sensitive land uses as feasible. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 7) Throughout construction,the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with included noise attenuating devices and are properly maintained. This mitigation measure shall be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 8) Idling equipment must be turned off when not in use. This mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic ® Development, or designee during routine inspections. 9) Equipment must be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. This mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 10) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary Item L-N 142 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 12 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho.Cucamonga, at a.regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item L-N 143 Conditions of Approval AUCAMONN Community Development Department Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG///N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST- 021037102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. Approval is for the construction of one industrial building with a floor area of 116,480 square feet within the Industrial Park (IP) District, located at 102204th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue; APN: 0210-0371-02. 2. Proposed land uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit as identified in Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code, shall require a separate review and approval by the Planning' Director and/or Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check, issuance of a Business License, and building occupancy. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. �. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD)Standards. 5. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan 6. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 7. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, _City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate tum-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 8. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 9.. At the southeast and southwest corners of the building and at the vertical elements along the wall plane on all elevations, incorporate a sandblasted concrete finish to differentiate these features from the adjacent wall panels. 00. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/15/2015 Item L-N 144 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG///N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 11. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall. provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 12. Downspouts shall not be visible -.from... the exterior on any elevations of the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 13. The minimum landscape coverage for this project is 15 percent. The area along the perimeter of the project site, adjacent to the east property line, near the truck parking/dock area shall be landscaped with ground cover, shrubs, and trees as required in the Development Code. 14. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments,transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 15. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. - 16: A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric- diagram,.. shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 17. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one. tree per 30 linear feet of building. 18. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 19. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of, water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 20. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 21. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking"and for"employee parking only." www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 13 Printed:111512015 Item L-N 145 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG/// N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 �roject Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 22. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 P.M. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 23. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking, with a minimum of one rack with a capacity for two bicycles. 24. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for ity staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions equired by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 25. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 26. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or a similarly dark color. 27. New walls, including retaining walls, shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the building. 28. All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices, etc. shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. 29. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corner of the building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDG) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) are to be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the building. . 30. The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. ®he maximum height of light standards, including the base, measured from the finished surface is 25 feet. www.CityofRC.us Punted:1/15/2015 Page 3 of 13 Item L-N 146 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG///N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST- 021037102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 31. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any- such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. . 32. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s), are for information only to .all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 33. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 34. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 35. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 36. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally. integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 37. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, 'including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and, submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 38. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. www.QtyofRC.us Page 4 of 13 Printed:1/15/2015 . Item L-N 147 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG/ll N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Oroject Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 39. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees-24-inch box or larger. 40. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 41. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 42. The employee lunch area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the building, and tables, chairs/benches, and waste receptacles shall be provided. 43. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, ..to the satisfaction of the Planning Director: 0 Architecturally integrated into the design of(the shopping center/the project). . Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll-up doors. e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 44. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department._._to.._.show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 45. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree .removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 46. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 47. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be �ubmitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. us Printed: 1/15/2015 www.CityofRC. Page 5 of 13 Item L-N 148 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG///N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Developnjent Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 48. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of. this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require . separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 49. All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. 50. Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrances to the site, behind the public right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the 45-foot setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. 51. The landscaping shall be installed prior to release for occupancy. 52. Approval of this application - is contingent on the approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567. 53. All Conditions of Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845. B Engineerina Services Department 1. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 2. Pavement reconstruction and overlays up to southerly curb of 4th Street median will be determined. during plan check. 3. The development requires installation of fiber .optics conduits, vaults and manholes on. 4th Street; per City Standard Plans 135-137. Also, the improvement plans need to show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes using Standard Plans 135-137. 4. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from. landfills; and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the. first Building Permit application is submitted to the: Engineering Services Department when the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. www.QtyofRC.US Page 6 of 13 Printed:1115/2015 Item L-N 149 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG/// N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST- 021037102-0000 Oroject Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 5. 4th Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards as required and including: a. Protect or repair curb and gutter, as required. b. Provide curvilinear sidewalk and street trees, as required. c. Proposed driveway approaches shall conform to Std. Dwg. 101, Type C, including maximum radius of curb return. d. Provide one (1) 9500 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlight at east property line. e. Provide traffic signing and striping, as required. f. No median breaks on 4th Street. g. The existing driveway on the adjacent parcel will need to maintain the existing access condition. It cannot be converted to emergency vehicle access only as part of this project. 6. Site is located within Assessment District 82-1 and therefrom exempt from payment of drainage fees. 7. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical except for 66 KV)on the project side of 4th Street shall be undergrounded- from the first pole offsite west of the westerly property line to first pole offsite east of easterly property line prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. 8. Relocation of 66KV power poles by Southern California Edison Company if necessary shall be paid for and coordinated by the developer on 4th Street.. 9. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. -- 10. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to Building Permit issuance. Printed:1/15/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 13 Item L-N 150 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG/// N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 11. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: 4th Street Curb& Gutter A.C. Pvmt Curvilinear Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees 12. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. 4th Street Foreground Botanical Name- Platanus acerifolia "Columbus" Common Name-London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space-7' Spacing -40' O.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 13. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with. adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 14. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 15. Process a relinquishment of vehicular access rights, dedicated on Parcel Map 5239, for the approved driveway locations on 4th Street. www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 13 Printed:1/15/2015 Item L-N 151 . Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: , 116K SF IND BLDG/// N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 0roject Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B Engineering Services Department 16. Street Name-4th Street Background Botanical Name- 30% Pinus canariensis Common Name-Canary Island Pine Min. Grow Space- 7' , Spacing -35' 0.C. Size- 15 Gallon 17. Provide an easement along the easterly portion of the Turner Rancho parcel for the benefit of the parcel to the east to provide emergency vehicle access to the rear of that parcel. This is anticipated to provide secondary emergency access to the parcel to the east should the existing driveway be eliminated by future development. 18. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 19. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the 1wase of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 20. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. . In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 21. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 22. Street Name-ACCENT Botanical Name- Lagerstroemia hybrid "Muskogee" Common Name- Lavender Crape Myrtle Hybrid Min. Grow Space- 2' Spacing -20' 0.C. Size- 24" Box 23. Provide separate utility . services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, I-lectric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/15/2015 Page 9 of 13 Item L-N 152 Project#: DRC2014-00666 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG N N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Enaineering Services Department 24. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. ' Security shall *be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street 'name signing, traffic signal conduit, and . interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or 'lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to. City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. E. Grading Section 1. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 2. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 3. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 4. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. www.QtyofRC.us Printed:1/1512015 Page 10 of 13 - Item L-N 153 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845; ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG 111 N/S 4TH, W/0 HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Oroject Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 5. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. c10. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be onstructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 11. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit.. The grading agreement and' bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 12. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 13. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subjectto suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. �14. Prior to the issuance,of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of greement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" .shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. W W W.CityofRCi.u5 Printed:1H5/2015 Page 11 of 13 Item L-N 154 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG///N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 15. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 16. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement _City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 17. The land owner shall provide an inspection .report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 18. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner. shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 19. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 20. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 21. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 22. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Fourth Street) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 23. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 24. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an ity of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of' a grading under parkway culvert per C permit. 25. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 13 Printed:1/15/2015 Item L-N 155 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG/// N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Oroject Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 26. The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 27. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 28. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 29. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 30. Enter a Custom Condition Here 31. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) is required to show how ALL impervious areas will treat the storm water, this includes the. impervious area within the Public Right-of-Way, including new driveways and driveways with removal and replacement of impervious Wrea. As the City of Rancho Cucamonga will not allow any structural treatment storm water BMP est Management Practices) devices within the public right of way, which will require any maintenance costs to be paid for by the City, the City will allow the use of the maximum extent practicable (MEP) principle. On the WQMP you may show your hydrology drainage area boundaries to the extent of the proposed or remove/replacement pervious area to- compute the storm water treatment design capture volume (DCV) to be treated on-site (i.e. the net lot area). Should you have any questions regarding this MEP principle please contact Matthew Addington, Associate Engineer, at extension 4202. Should you choose to use this MEP principle please describe your use of this principle in Form 1-1 of the final-project specific Water Quality Management Plan, when such a plan is submitted for review to obtain a grading permit. • us Printed:1!15/2015 www.CityofRC. Page 13 of 13 Item L-N 156 • RESOLUTION NO. 15-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00845, A REQUEST TO REMOVE TREES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING OF ABOUT 116,480 SQUARE FEET ON A PARCEL OF ABOUT 249,000 SQUARE FEET (5.72 ACRES) IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DISTRICT LOCATED AT 10220 4TH STREET ABOUT 1,600 FEET WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF— APN: 0210-0371-02. A. Recitals. 1. Turner Real Estate Investments filed an application for Tree Removal Permit DRC2014- 00845 as described in the title of this Resolution.. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of January 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 28, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at 10220 4th Street-about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue; and b. The property has an area of about 249,000 square feet (5.72 acres) and is about 415 feet (east-west) by about 601 feet (north-south); and C. The western two-thirds of the property was previously developed with two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 22,500 square feet, and associated surface improvements such as asphalt storage/parking areas and landscaping comprised of ground cover and numerous mature trees along 4th Street and along the perimeter; and • d. The City's records are incomplete regarding these buildings but based on the information that is available, these buildings were most likely constructed in the late 1970's or early 1980's. Within the last few years there has been ongoing deconstruction/demolition activity on the Item L-N 158 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-13 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00845—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 2 property and, therefore, only the smaller of the two buildings, the paving, and the landscaping remain. The eastern one-third of parcel is vacant and is dominated by short grasses. Development of the site for the subject project will result in the removal of all the identified improvements; and e. The project site is bound on the north by industrial office buildings. To the east is a property that is partially developed with a building of about 13,000 square feet. To the west is a vacant property while to the south, on the opposite side of 4th Street, is an apartment complex (Centre Club Apartments) in the City of Ontario; and f. The zoning of the property and all properties to the north, east, and west is Industrial Park(IP) District. The zoning of the property to the south, in the City of Ontario, is Urban Residential —Ontario Center Specific Plan; and g. This application is in conjunction with Development Review DRC2014-00566 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567;and .h. The proposed project includes the removal of five(5)trees that are located at the south side of the project site. The applicant submitted a Tree Survey, prepared by MIG/Hogle- Ireland on August 27,2014,that included the description and health of the individual trees and their overall health and condition. The survey identified only one (1) of these trees as "heritage" tree which is subject to the City's tree preservation requirements as described in Section 17.80.050 of the Development Code; and i. It is necessary to remove the heritage tree in order to grade the site and construct the proposed building and associated improvements which will allow economic enjoyment of the property; and j. There are not many trees within the surrounding industrial properties. However,the applicant will be required to plant new trees as required by the Development Code for new industrial development. Based on a review of the landscape plan for the proposed building,77 new trees will be planted on the property; and k. The trees cannot be preserved by pruning and proper maintenance or relocation rather than removal; and. I. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource of the City. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. 'The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and Item L-N 159 " PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-13 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00845—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 • Page 3 d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,togetherwith all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; • and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on.these findings and prior to the approving Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Manager of the City of Rancho_Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Item L-N 160 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-13 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00845_TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January28, 2015 Page 4 BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett,Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting-of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item'L-N 161. Conditions of Approval RANCHOGCommunity Development Department Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG III N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. Approval is for the construction of one industrial building with a floor area of 116,480 square feet within the Industrial Park (IP) District, located at 102204th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue; APN: 0210-0371-02. 2. Proposed land uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit as identified in Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code, shall require a separate review and approval by the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check, issuance of a Business License, and building occupancy. 3. Approval of. this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 40. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in aclear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD) Standards. 5. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan 6. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a .required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 7. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate tum-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 8. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 9. At the southeast and southwest comers of the building and at the vertical elements along the wall plane on all elevations, incorporate a sandblasted concrete finish to differentiate these features from the adjacent wall panels. 400. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. Printed:1115/2015 www.CityofRC.us Item L-N 162 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG///N/S 4TH,W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 11. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 12. Downspouts shall not be visible from the .=exterior. on. any_ elevations of the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 13. The minimum landscape coverage for this project is 15 percent. The area along the perimeter of the project site, adjacent to the east property line, near the truck parking/dock area shall be landscaped with ground cover, shrubs, and trees as required in the Development Code. 14. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments,transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 15. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review. and approved prior-to the issuance of Building Permits. 16. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 17. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at .a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 18. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 19. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the_principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82: 20. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 21. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking" and for"employee parking only." www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 13 Printed:1/15/2015 Item L-N 163 _ Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG/// N/S 4TH, W/0 HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 roject Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal 0 Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 22. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 P.M. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building. materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects - between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 23. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking, with a minimum of one rack with a capacity for two bicycles. 24. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for 0eity staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions quired by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 25. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 26. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or a similarly dark color. 27. New walls, including retaining walls, shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the building. 28. All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices, etc. shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. 29. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or - proposed shall be installed at locations not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corner of the building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) are to be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the building. 30. The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. � he maximum height of light standards, including the base, measured from the finished surface is 25 feet. Printed:1115/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 13 Item L-N 164 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG///N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 31. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 32. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 33. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department' of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 34. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 35. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 36. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 37. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 38. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 13 Printed:1/15/2015 Item L-N 165 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG/// N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Wroject Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 39. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees- 24-inch box or larger. 40. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 41. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 42. The employee lunch area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the building, and tables, chairs/benches, and waste receptacles shall be provided. 43. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director: Architecturally integrated into the design of(the shopping center/the project). Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll-up doors. e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 44. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance..-.--.-The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 45. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 46. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 47. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be &ubmitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Printed:1/15/2015 www.cftyofRc.us Page 5 of 13 Item L-N 166 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG///N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 48. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 49. All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. Thedesign of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. 50. Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrances to the site, behind the public right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the 45-foot setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. 51. The landscaping shall be installed prior to release for occupancy. 52. Approval of this application is contingent on the approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567. 53. All Conditions of Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Tree Removal,Permit DRC2014-00845. B Engineering Services Department 1. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 2. Pavement reconstruction and overlays up to southerly curb of 4th Street median will be determined. during plan check. 3. The development requires installation of fiber optics conduits, vaults and manholes on 4th Street per City Standard Plans 135-137. Also, the improvement plans need to show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes using Standard Plans 135-137. 4. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a .Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when -the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 13 Printed:111512015 Item L-N 167 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG/// N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST- 021037102-0000 �roject Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 5. 4th Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards as required and including: a. Protect or repair curb and gutter, as required. b. Provide curvilinear sidewalk and street trees, as required. c. Proposed driveway approaches shall conform to Std. Dwg. 101, Type C, including maximum radius of curb return. d. Provide one (1) 9500 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlight at east property line. e. Provide traffic signing and striping, as required. f. No median breaks on 4th Street. g. The existing driveway on the adjacent parcel will need to maintain the existing access • condition. It cannot be converted to emergency vehicle access only as part of this project. 6. Site is located within Assessment District 82-1 and therefrom exempt from payment of drainage . fees. 7. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical except for 66 KV) on the project side of 4th Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite west of the westerly property line to first pole offsite east of easterly property line prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. 8. Relocation of 66KV power poles by Southern California Edison Company if necessary shall be paid for and coordinated by the developer on 4th Street.. 9. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or - issuance---of - Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 10. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to Building Permit issuance. www.CityofRC.us Punted:1/15/2015 Page 7 of 13 Item L-N 168 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG 111 N/S 4TH,W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 11. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including; but not.limited to: 4th Street Curb& Gutter A.C. Pvmt Curvilinear Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees 12. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. 4th Street Foreground Botanical Name-Platanus acerifolia`'Columbus" Common Name-London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space- 7' Spacing -40' O.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)Ail street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 13. Intersection. line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _ adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 14. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 15. Process a relinquishment of vehicular access rights, dedicated on Parcel Map 5239, for the approved driveway locations on 4th Street. www.CityofRC.Us Page B of 13 Printed:1/15/2015 Item L-N 169 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014=00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG///N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Orojeict Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 16. Street Name-4th Street Background Botanical Name- 30% Pinus canariensis Common Name- Canary Island Pine Min. Grow Space -7' Spacing -.35' 0.C. Size- 15 Gallon 17. Provide an easement along the easterly portion of the Turner Rancho parcel for the benefit of the parcel to the east to provide emergency vehicle.access to the rear of that parcel. This is anticipated to provide secondary emergency access to the parcel to the east should the existing driveway be eliminated by future development. 18. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 19. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga . Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such AWfter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the Wase of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 20. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 21. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 22. Street Name-ACCENT Botanical Name- Lagerstroemia hybrid "Muskogee Common Name- Lavender Crape Myrtle Hybrid Min. Grow Space- 2' Spacing-20' 0.C. Size-24" Box 3. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, lectric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/15/2015 Page 9 of 13 Item L-N 170 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG///N/S 4TH, W/0 HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 24. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements; prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to .any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. E Grading Section 1. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 2. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 3. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 4. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. , Wm.cityofRc.us Page 10 of 13 Printed:1115/2015 Item L-N 171 - Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG ///N/S 4TH, W/O.HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST-021037102-0000 Wroject Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 5. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design.recommendations per said report. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for' review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. c10. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be onstructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 11. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 12. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 13. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City 'of Rancho- Cucamonga Building- and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. O'14. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of greement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. Printed:7/15/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 13 Item L-N 172 Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG///N/S.4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST- 021037102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: .E. Grading Section 15. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 16. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 17. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a. biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 18. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 19. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 20. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality 'Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 21. The Preliminary Water. Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 22. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Fourth Street) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 23. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the. issuance of building permits. 24. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 25. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 13 Printed:1/15/2015 Item L=N 173 _ Project#: DRC2014-00566 DRC2014-00567, DRC2014-00845, ENG2014-00026 Project Name: 116K SF IND BLDG/// N/S 4TH, W/O HAVEN Location: 10220 4TH ST- 021037102-0000 Oroject Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Engineering Plan Check,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 26. The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking -stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 27. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 28. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 29. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 30. Enter a Custom Condition Here 31. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) is required to show how ALL impervious areas will treat the storm water, this includes the impervious area within the Public Right-of-Way, including new driveways -and driveways with removal and replacement of impervious ftrea. As the City of Rancho Cucamonga will not allow any structural treatment storm water BMP Best Management Practices) devices within the public right of way, which will require any maintenance costs to be paid for by the City, the City will allow the use of the maximum extent practicable (MEP) principle. On the WQMP you may show your hydrology drainage area boundaries to the extent of the proposed or remove/replacement pervious area to compute the storm water treatment design capture volume (DCV) to be treated on-site (i.e. the net lot area). Should you have any questions regarding this MEP principle please contact Matthew Addington, Associate Engineer, at extension 4202. Should you choose to use this MEP principle please describe your use of this principle in Form 1-1 of the final-project specific Water Quality Management Plan, when such a plan is submitted for review to obtain a grading permit. Printed:1/15/2015 www.CityofRC.uS Page 13 of.13 --- --.._. ......... --- -._.. - . ._... _... -. ._.-.. ...-... - Item L-N 174 --— - -- ft.,-A SIGN-IN SHEET RANCHO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CUCAMONGA JANUARY 28, 2015 NAME COMPANY ADDRESSIEMAIL SS b9 IaJ e�tun�xkCmAay., owo bv,►�clar c.nkexuK,�t'os, •��x�C! l�n z:/�R-� Tn�star 3-! V—roovl z c &hot wLa. •co 91-10 1 �a ( Uej Schrader, Lois From: Perez, Dominick Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 7:24 AM To: Schrader, Lois Subject: RE: engineers for Brittany/Saphire Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Rob Otte Otte-Berkeley Group, Inc 575 E Carreon Drive Colton, Ca 92324 From:Schrader, Lois Sent:Thursday,January 29, 2015 5:43 PM To: Perez, Dominick Subject:engineers for Brittany/Saphire Do you have a correct spelling and firm address for Rob Oddy? Lois J. Schrader Schrader, Lois Planning Commission Secretary Planning(PLN) 4329 Work Lois.Schrader@cityofrc.us 1 eGoa (7 � 825 East Third Street,San Bernardino,CA 92415-08351 Phone:909.387.8109 Fax:909.387.7876 :'rwtv.SB(O nt).gov " ` ----- Department of Public Works SAN BERNARDINO . Environmental&Construction a Flood Control roe"Newcombe COUNTY • Operations a Solid Waste Management Director • Surveyor • Transportation r January 28, 2015 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga JAN 2 8 2015 File: 10(ENV)-4.01 Planning Department Po Box sol RECEIVED - PLANNING Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 Michael.smith(&-citvofrc.us RE: CEQA— NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dear Mr. Smith: Thank you for giving the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works the opportunity to comment on the above-referenced project. We received this request on December 18, 2014, and pursuant to our review, the following comments are provided: Environmental Management Division(Nancy Sansonetti Senior Planner 909-387-1866): 1. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 will allow logistics buildings to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Although a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in floor area is permitted within the Industrial Park (IP) District, the construction and use of a building with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. Please address the cumulative impact of doubling the area of impervious surface that will be allowed with this project and the subsequent increased stormwater runoff and decreased percolation impacts will affect the environment. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who provided the specific comment, as listed above. Sincerely, NIDHAM ARAM ALRAYES, MSCE, PE, QSD/P Public Works Engineer III Environmental Management NAA:PE:n h/CEQAComment_Ranchocucamonga_MND_TumerRealEsmte_201"1-28.01 /r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 Y DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 4 with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Department 1) Burrowing owl mitigation: a) Avoidance during the breeding season - Breeding season avoidance measures, including but not limited to those as follows shall be implemented. A pre-construction survey for resident burrowing owls shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within 30 days prior to construction activities. If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre-construction survey,the site will be resurveyed for owls. Pre-construction survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non-breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre-construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre-construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation would be required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre- construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and would minimally include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. b) Burrow exclusion and/or closure during the non-breeding season - During the non-breeding season (September 1 through January 31), if burrows occupied by migratory or non-migratory resident burrowing owls are detected during a pre-construction survey, then burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 5 c) Nesting Birds - If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist.The temporary"no construction"area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the project proponent shall submit, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, a Coating Restriction Plan (CRP), consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) guidelines and a letter agreeing to include in any construction contracts and/or subcontracts a requirement that the contractors adhere to the CRP. The CRP measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of City Building Director. These may include the following: • That volatile organic compounds(VOC)of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 100 for interior applications. ■ That volatile organic compounds(VOC)of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 100 g/I for exterior applications. This measure shall conform to the performance standard that emissions of volatile organic compounds from application of interior or exterior coatings shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The CRP shall specify use of High-Volume, Low Pressure (HVLP) spray guns for application of coatings. 2) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Z, .-_ A.1 /0 49 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-12 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS January 28, 2015 Page 8 Biological Resources dish trhed rlt ming the nesting season (CebF rani 1 thM tnh August st Q1 eitheF(a)the adult bffiFds haye not begun egg laying and t 1) For vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity that occurs at any time year round,a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistentwith CDFW protocols. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist.Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. 2) The tree that is removed shall be replaced with a new tree, on a one- to-one basis, of a minimum 15-gallon size. This tree is in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public approximately the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. 'Al �_ 70 R6 Cox From: Bobby[mailto:ry gonzo@hotmail.com] Sent:Wednesday,January 28, 2015 1:31 PM To: Perez, Dominick Subject:tenative tract map 18961 To Whom it May Concern, My name is Robert Gonzalez and I own the home located at 8388 Brittany Lane in Rancho Cucamonga. I have a couple concerns and questions that should be addressed for the record, regarding the new proposed development with respect to any and all additional drainage/runoff that will be generated by this development of new homes. Most importantly, I have a 15" V ditch drain located in the back of my property that currently overwflows when it rains. This runoff rainwater naturally flows downhill, onto the horse trail and directly into the property located at 8410 Jennet in Rancho Cucamonga. There is no barrier to redirect any of this runoff rainwater that flows downhill into this property. As I understand it, any runoff rainwater from the new homes to be built, will be directed to a V ditch. The drainage from this new V ditch will obviously be directed into the V ditch located on my property because of the slope of the land. This additional runoff will further complicate the runoff overflow that is already a recurring issue. This will in turn generate a more steady flow of water. This is not only a safey issue for home in the direct line of fire but also for the lives of family members that live in these great neighborhoods. If there are any doubts please take a drive up Sapphire on a rainy day and then walk the horse trail behind my home to see for youself. I do not give my consent for crosslot drainage and I do not agree with this proposal. Who will be responsible for any and all damages that are a direct or indirect cause of this? Will it be the developer, the engineer, the city? It is not a question of if the damage will be done, it is only a question of when. Will it be the 50 or 100 year storm or just a plain old rainy day? Another concern I will be addresing, is the drain inlet in the front of my home that sits just to the left of my property. If and when a larger inlet is to be installed here, what will happen to the mature 50' Sycamore tree in my front yard? Any cutting and or digging will most definetly cause damage to the roots of this tree and in so doing will compromise the stability of our tree. If the integrity of this tree is compromised then the safety of our children, our selves, our home, our cars and our neighbors would be at risk in the event this tree falls from said damage to its roots. This tree currently shades our home on hot summer days, our driveway and our garage. It shades our lawn, which enables us to water less and helps it stay green. I look forward to seeing you at the meeting this evening and discussing the above matters in addition to other concerns. Thank You Bobby Gonzalez 626-831-2958 H®9 le-Ireland CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 27,2015 JAN 2 7 2015 California Department of Fish&Wildlife Inland Deserts Region RECEIVED - PLANNING 3602 Inland Empire Boulevard,Suite C-220 Ontario,California 91764 Subject:4th Street Industrial Park Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration CDFW Letter Review and Response to Comments(State Clearinghouse No.2014121079) Ms.MacNair: At the City's request, MIGIHogle-Ireland (MIG) has reviewed the IS/MND comment letter from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife dated January 15, 2015. Karen Kirtland of Natural Resources Assessment, Inc. is on vacation and unable to review the letter. Although MIG did not prepare the General Biological Assessment, MIG biologists and ecologists prepared the Tree Survey and performed general reconnaissance at the site and are familiar with the habitats existing on and adjacent to the subject property. CDFW's letter expresses concern over the potential for burrowing owl to occur on the project site and recommends additional surveys.CDFW's letter also recommends that Mitigation Measure 1,Section 4 be amended to include pre-construction nesting bird surveys regardless of time of year to ensure compliance with all federal,state and local laws. Although MIG is in general agreement with the project biologist (NRA) that the site provides marginal suitable habitat for burrowing owl, we recognize that the California Natural Diversity Data Base exhibits multiple documented occurrences of burrowing owl within close proximity to the site (within a mile) in similar habitats. In addition, MIG agrees with CDFW that the nesting season for multiple species does not fall within the general February 1 through August 31 timeframe and that pre-construction avian surveys be conducted to ensure compliance with applicable laws. Therefore, the following revision and amendment to Mitigation Measure 1, Section 4 is proposed in order to implement more effective mitigation pursuant to CEQA Section 15074.1: # Prior to site clearing, tree removal, or site grading activities regardless of time of year, Wi4 !_'thF9wgh August "', a breeding bird survey will be required to determine if nesting is occurring within or adjacent to the project site. Occupied nests will not be disturbed during the nesting season lP ithFeugh August "` unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either(a)the adult birds have not begun egg-laying and incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is not able to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests during the breeding season so as to avoid abandonment of the young(CDFW 2012b). To avoid potential impacts to burrowing owl focused surveys following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012) will be performed at the site. Z-1 N/ A/ PLANNING I DESIGN I COMMUNICATIONS I MANAGEMENT I TECHNOLOGY 1 500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 1 10 + Riverside. California 92507 USA 9 951 .737.9222 www.migcom.com California Department of Fish&Wildlife 2 January 27,2015 Inland Deserts Region If you have any questions,please contact Laura Moran at 510-845-7549. Sincerely, , ^ v � Laura Moran Director of Ecosystem Restoration Services ./IL• J ' STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G.BROWN,JR.,Governor OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION z DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION ;.G'E .. 1725 23rd Street,Suite 100 •.�, SACRAMENTO,CA 95816-7100 (916)445.7000 Fax:(916)445.7053 calshpo®pa*s.ca.gov www.ohp.parks.ca.gov CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 26, 2015 JAN 2 6 2015 Mike smith RECEIVED - PLANNING Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Smith, RE: MND Turner Crossing Project � �14 Thank you for including the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) in the environmental review process for the proposed Tumer Crossing Project. Pursuant the National Historic Preservation Act and the California Public Resources Code, the State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO)and the OHP have broad responsibility for the implementation of federal and state historic preservation programs in California. The following comments are based on the information included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)for the Turner Crossing Project. The proposed project as described in the MND for the Turner Crossing project involves a development code amendment to allow for the construction of a 50,000 square foot logistics warehouse building at 10220 4t'street, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. The surrounding parcels are vacant with no development. The proposed project involves demolition of several existing site improvements (structures and paving) and construction of a new warehouse building. New construction would involve extensive earthworks including grading, compaction, and excavation to prepare the site for construction of a new 50,000 square foot logistics warehouse building. The Mitigated Negative Declaration has addressed archeological resources only in terms of mitigation. An effort needs to be made prior to the adoption of an environmental document to identify the potential for archeological resources within the project area and vicinity. If potential sites are identified before work begins on the site, they can be addressed early on, before construction occurs, and perhaps avoid impacts. Simply referencing the mitigation measures from the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR), a programmatic environmental document, is not adequate. Pursuant to Section 21080(c)of the Public Resources Code a Lead Agency may adopt a negative declaration if"[t]here is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment." There is no evidence in the initial study or mitigated negative declaration that the Lead Agency made any effort to determine if archeological or other cultural properties exist, or potentially exist, within the project area. At a minimum, the Lead Agency should request a cultural resources site records report from the San Bernardino Archeological Information Center at the San Bernardino County Museum. Based on that report the Lead Agency should determine what further actions should be undertaken, including monitoring and/or avoidance. If monitoring at the project site during the ground disturbing parts of the project is appropriate, monitoring should be undertaken by professionals meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications for Archeology. We do not believe that simply adopting the mitigation measures from the General Plan FPEIR, without any project specific analysis, will reduce potential impacts to archeological resources to a less than significant level. The MND acknowledges that"the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6)." and that"Construction activity particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing potential archaeological resources" yet makes no attempt to identify if resources are likely to be discovered prior to construction. The parcels adjacent to the project area (east and west) are undeveloped, and a qualified archeologist performing a field survey on these parcels may be able to determine the likelihood of discovery on the project site during earth disturbing activities. However, since no attempt was made to identify the potential for archeological resources beyond a review of the General Plan FPEIR, this opportunity could not be realized. Public Resources Code Section 21083.2 explicitly requires that the initial study examine whether the project may have a significant adverse effect on archaeological resources. The OHP does not believe that simply adopting the mitigation measures included in the General Plan FPEIR, without any project specific analysis, can reduce potential impacts to archeological resources to a less than significant level. We also recommend that the Lead Agency consult with the Native American Heritage Commission and pursue efforts to contact Native American tribes regarding the presence of cultural materials which may be impacted by the proposed project. If you have questions, please contact Sean de Courcy of the Local Government and Environmental Compliance Unit, at(916)445-7042 or at Sean.deCou rcyO-)parks.ca.gov. Sincerely, . �,, ►►,�. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JAN 2 6 2015 Carol Roland-Nawi, Ph.D. RECEIVED e PLANNING State Historic Preservation Officer Conditions of Approval Y R NCI to CUCnuoNcA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC- 7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. Notice of Exemption-$50 2. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961 with applicable Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 6. Any proposed Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. Printed:1126/2015 "w.CityofRC.us D toy — 7 ? .. ?i Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., A. Planning Department 7. Any proposed Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department that provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a. minimum width of 10 feet. Corral locations must meet proximity requirements and shall be consistent with Section 17.88 of the Development Code(Animal Regulations). 9. Future development of the site shall be in accordance with the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations for the Equestrian Overlay of the Very Low(VL)Residential District. 10. Prior to recordation of the final map, the local feeder trail shall be installed. Local feeder trail entrances. shall also provide access for . service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in concept with Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 11. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building and Safety Official. 12. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a fence and wall plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. Where comer side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. This material shall be consistent throughout the development. The walls on each lot shall be located interior to the equestrian trails and drainage easements. 13. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 14. Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department indicating that a bridge will be provided over the V-ditch where the drainage easement is adjacent to rear and side yard access gates to' allow each lot adequate access to the equestrian trails. 15. Approval is for the subdivision of one existing 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels within the Equestrian Overlay of the Very Low (VL) Residential Zoning District located at the northeast comer of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane at 5615 Sapphire Street-APN: 1061-691-04. www .QtycfRC.us Printed:7126/2015 Page 2 of 13 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC- 7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. ROJECT.A. Planning Department 16. Any proposals for development within the project site shall require the review and approval of the City's Planning Department prior to construction. 17. Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department indicating that gate access will be provided to the rear of all lots adjoining the private equestrian trail. 18. Prior to recordation of the final map, all trail adjacent drainage facilities must be installed and shall have a depth no greater than 6 inches. 19. Prior to grading and/or construction, the applicant shall consult with a qualified biologist to determine the best means (such as trapping, barriers, relocation, etc.) for controlling the migration of animals onto neighboring properties while the site is being graded and homes are being constructed. The applicant shall then submit a report indicating which method(s) will be used, and implement them accordingly. 20. Per Development Code Section 17.16.080, prior to issuance of a permit for the development of this site a tree removal permit shall be required for the removal of any onsite heritage tree. 21. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the site shall be in comformance with the Migratory Bird Act. 22. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, Per Development Code Section 17.16.080 a Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained for the removal of any heritage trees onsite. B. Engineering Services Department 1. Per City Driveway Policy, driveways on Sapphire Street, a "Collector" street, shall have circular or hammerhead driveways. 2. Lot 2 to maintain parkways on both Brittany Lane and Sapphire Street. If Lot 2 has a wall along Sapphire Street, it shall be at least 5 feet behind the sidewalk and provide access for homeowner maintenance of the Sapphire parkway. Note on the public improvement plans that private landscaping and irrigation systems shall be installed in the parkways of Lot 2, prior to occupancy of said lot. 3. Brittany Lane (including the new cul-de-sac) frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local Street" standards, as required, including curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, ADA access ramps, drive approaches, LED streetlights and street trees. a. Provide 5800 Lumens LED streetlights, as required. b. Provide traffic signing and striping, as required, including Stop Sign, Limit Line and Stop Legend. c. Revise existing street improvement plans Drawing Nos. 1317, as required by the City Engineer. d. Inlet to the curbside drain outlet shall be designed to prevent blockage with infrequent homeowner maintenance. Use Standard Drawing 107-B for 12-inch or larger private drainage facility. Printed:1/26/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 13 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 108169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 4. The new cul-de-sac shall intersect Brittany Lane radial to the existing centerline curve. The centerline radius on the new cul-de-sac. shall be at least 300 feet, consistent with the Street Design Policy. 5. Sapphire Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector Street" standards, as required, including curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, ADA access ramp, cross gutter, drive approaches, LED streetlights and street trees. a. Provide drive approach for vehicular access to private local trail along the north tract boundary. Also, provide a curbside drain outlet(s) through the street right-of-way for private drainage facility(s) adjacent to trail. Where a downstream end of a trail meets a street, the trail shall be graded at no more than 0.5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the right-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of trail surface debris onto the sidewalk/street. Inlet to the curbside drain outlet shall be designed to prevent blockage with infrequent homeowner maintenance. b. City Standard Drawing No. 100-A calls for 4 inch A.C. over C.A.B.for a City Collector. c. Provide 5800 Lumens LED streetlights, as required. d. Provide traffic signing and striping, as required. e. Revise existing street improvement plans, Drawing No. 1713, as required by the City Engineer. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Sapphire Street shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage, extending to the first pole off site (north and south), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Sapphire Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/26/2015 Page 4 of 13 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Deuartment 10. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 11. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 30 total feet on Brittany Lane 30 total feet on Brittany Court 12. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 13.Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 14. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 15. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 16. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive- approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 17. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/26!2015 Page 5 of 13 Project# SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike,LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 18. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Sapphire Street Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees ADA Access Ramp 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to.: Brittany Lane Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees ADA Access Ramp 20. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Brittany Court Curb& Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees www .cityofRc.us Printed:1/26/2015 Page 6 of 13 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC- 7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 22. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Sapphire Street Botanical Name-Pistacia chinensis Common Name-Chinese Pistache Min. Grow Space-5' Spacing-50'0.C. Size- 15 gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 23. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required,' tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Brittany Lane including new cul-de-sac) Botanical Name-Platanus acerifolia Common Name-London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space-7 Spacing-40'0.C. Size- 15 gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils. report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Printed: 112612015 www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 13 Project# SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike,LLC- 7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 21. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to. and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2)Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. vwwZtyofRC.us Printed:1126/2015 Page 7 of 13 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 24. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground)o in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 25. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 26. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 27. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 28. Provide calculations and install appropriate additional drainage inlet facilities as determined by the City Engineer at the south end of Brittany Lane. E. Grading Section 1. Prior to recording the Final Map the applicant shall submit to the Building and Safety Department a Grading and Drainage Plan for approval and a permit for the private cross-lot drainage and equestrian trails, and the applicant shall install the equestrian trail improvements and shall install the e.toss lot drainage devices adjacent to the equestrian trails and along the westerly property line of Lot 3. 2. Prior to the recording the Final Map the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorders Office. 3. Prior to the development of each lot, each lot shall have a topographic survey completed prior to submittal to the Planning Department for an entitlement on said lot(s). 4. As future development occurs for each lot, should the applicant for a lot choose to use a different storm water quality treatment Best Management Practices (BMP) device other than what is described in the recorded Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan, the applicant's civil engineer of record shall prepare a priority. water quality management plan for that lot to be included as an appendix to the recorded Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan. The civil engineer of record shall sign and seal the document, and the document shall be signed by the owner of the property. 5. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the recordation of the final map a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. Printed:1/26/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 13 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- E. ROJECT.E. Grading Section 6. If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the land owner shall provide an i inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration pits to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 7. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 8. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 9. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 10. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 11. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 12. In the equestrian trails: — Provide PVC fence, 4" thick DG surface, parallel drainage V ditch, bridge over V ditch where necessary for access corals, gates to corrals, S< 5% cross fall 2%, S>5% cross fall 4%. Water bars required at the spacing for the slopes shown respectively: 50' for 4% to 6%, 40' for 6% to 9%, 30' for 9% to 12%, 20' for 12%+. In the equestrian trails water bars shall also be placed at the top and bottom where the gradient of the trail changes, i.e. a steep downhill slope which will cause additional erosion to the trail. 13. If the storm water treatment infiltration pits are 10-feet or deeper below the surface of the ground the land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 14. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan"shall be recorded prior to the recordation of the final map. 15. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. Printed:7126/2015 .atyofRc.us Page 10 of 13 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike,LLC- 7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off-site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. 17. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit for any lot or lots, the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 18. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for, the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 19. If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 20. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 21. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 22. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 23. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 24. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 25. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Printed:1/26/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 13 Project#: SUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- E. ROJECT.E. Grading Section 26. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 27. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 28. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 29. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 30. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 31. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 32. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 33. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 34. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit°. 35. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, . the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. www.cityotRc.ug Printed:1/26/2015 Page 12 of 13 Project#: SUBTTIS961 Project Name: Hoike, LLC- 7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- E. ROJECT.E. Grading Section 36. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP)devices. 37. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 38. Prior to recordation of the final map the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. Printed:1;2612015 'www•CityofRC.us Page 13 of 13 State of California-Natural Resources Agency EDMUND G BROWN Jr Governor �• DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H.BONHAM,Director Inland Deserts Region 3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-220 Ontario,CA 91764 (909)484-0459 www.wildlife.ca.gov. January 15, 2015 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mr. Mike Smith JAN 2 6 2015 CiSenior Planner ty of Rancho Cucamonga RECEIVED - PLANNING Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA.91730 Subject: Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Project State Clearinghouse No. 2014121079 Dear Mr. Smith: The Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study(IS)and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)for the Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014- 00566 Project(Project) [State Clearinghouse No. 2014121079]. The Department is responding to the IS and MND as a Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources (California.Fish and Game Code Sections:71.1.7 and 1802, and.the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] Guidelines Section 15386), and as a Responsible Agency regarding any discretionary actions (CEQA Guidelines Section 15381), such as the issuance of a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement(California Fish and Game Code Sections 1600 of seq.) and/or a California Endangered Species Act(CESA) Permit for Incidental Take of Endangered,.Threatened, and/or Candidate species (California Fish and Game Code Sections 2080 and 2080:1). Proiect Description The Project is located within the Industrial Park District at 10220 4t' Street, approximately 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City), County of San Bernardino, California; Assessor's Parcel Number(APN) 0210- 371-02. The City proposes to review a proposal to amend the Development Code to allow buildings with floor areas in excess of 50,000 square feet to be constructed and operated for the purpose of logistics(warehouse/storage/distribution) on parcels that are within the Industrial Park District, and review a proposal to construct an industrial logistics building of about 116,480 square feet on the 5.72 acre parcel. Conserving Cafifornia's Wi(ffife Since 1870 �� /)?7 t Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014- 00566 Project SCH No. 2014121079 . Page 2 of 5 Biological Resources and Impacts The CEQA document should include recent biological survey data (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(a)). The CEQA document should also address species of special concern and federal critical habitat. If state or federal threatened or endangered species may occur within the project area, species specific surveys, conducted at the appropriate time of year and time of day, should be included with the CEQA document. If species specific surveys are not conducted, the Department recommends that the Lead Agency assume the presence of the species throughout the project site. Acceptable species specific surveys have been developed by the Department, and by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and are accessible through each agencies websites. Surveys for Burrowing Owl should follow the Department's 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 Staff Report), available for download here: http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/survey monitor.html Following review of the Biological Resources section of the IS, the Department identified a number of questions, comments and concerns, and requests that each of these be addressed prior to adoption of the proposed MND. The Department's questions, comments, and concerns include:. 1. The CEQA document identifies suitable habitat for burrowing owl within the project area, and the California Natural Diversity Database includes records of burrowing owls located within one mile of the project site. Based.on this. information, in the Department's opinion,the potential for owls to occur within the project site and particularly to forage within the project site is high. Therefore the project has the.potential to cause the loss of nesting and/or foraging habitat for burrowing owl. Please note that it is the Project proponent's responsibility to comply with all applicable laws related to nesting birds and birds of prey. Migratory non-game native bird species are protected by international treaty under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act(META)of 1918, as amended (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.). In addition, sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 of the Fish and Game Code (FGC) stipulate the following: Section 3503 states that it is unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise provided by FGC or any regulation made pursuant thereto; Section 3503.5 states that is it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or. Strigiformes (birds-of-prey)or to take,.possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as.otherwise provided by FGC or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto; and Section 3513 states that itis unlawful to take or possess any migratory nongame bird as designated in the MBTA or any part of such migratory nongame bird except as provided by rules and regulations adopted by the Secretary of the Interior under provisions of the MBTA. r' Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014- 00566 Project. SCH No. 2014121079 Page 3 of 5 Take of individual burrowing owls and their nests is defined by FGC section 86, and prohibited by sections 3503, 3503.5 and 3513. Take is defined in FGC Section 86 as "hunt, pursue, catch, capture or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture or kill. CEQA requires public agencies in California to analyze and disclose potential environmental impacts associated with a project that the agency will cant'out, fund, or approve. Any potentially significant impact must be mitigated to the extent.feasible. Due to lack of information on a mitigation plan to offset'impacts to the potential lossi of burrowing owl nesting and/or foraging habitat, the.Department is unable to determine whether the impacts would be mitigated, and cannot, without further information from the City concur that the project would have no significant impacts to burrowing owl. The Department recommends that the City follow the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (Department of Fish and Game, March 2012); available for download from the Department's website: https:/Avww.dfo.ca:gov/wildlife/nonaame/survey monitor html. The Department expects that the City will follow the Staff Report on Burrowing. Owl Mitigation, which species that the steps for project impact evaluations include: a. A habitat assessment; b. Surveys; and c. An impact assessment As stated in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation, the three progressive steps are effective in evaluating whether a project will result in impacts to burrowing owls, and the information gained from the steps will inform any subsequent avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures. Habitat assessments are conducted to evaluate the likelihood that a site supports burrowing owl. Burrowing owl surveys provide information needed to determine the potential effects of proposed projects and.activities on burrowing owls, and to avoid take in accordance with FGC sections 86, 3503, and 3503.5. Impact assessments evaluate the extent to which burrowing owls and their habitat may be impacted, directly or indirectly; on and within a reasonable distance of a proposed CEQA project activity or non-CEQA project. r Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Development Code Amendment ORC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014- 00566 Project SCH No. 2014121079 Page 4 of 5 To reduce potential impacts to burrowing owl to a level less than significant the Department recommends that the City revise the CEQA document, prior to adoption of the MND, to incorporate information gained from the implementation of the three progressive steps outlined above. If burrowing owls and/or their habitat may be impacted from the project, the Department recommends that the City include specific mitigation in the CEQA document. Please note that. mitigation must be roughly proportional to the level of impacts, including cumulative impacts, in accordance with the provisions of CEQA(CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15126.4(a)(4)(B), 15064, 15065, and 16355). Furthermore, in order for mitigation measures to be effective, they must be specific, enforceable, and feasible actions that will improve environmental conditions. Current scientific literature supports the conclusion that mitigation for permanent burrowing owl habitat loss necessitates replacement with an equivalent or greater habitat area for breeding, foraging, wintering, dispersal, presence of burrows, burrow surrogates, presence of fossorial mammal dens,well drained soils, and abundant and available prey within close proximity to the burrow. 2. Regarding.Mitigation Measure 1 under Section 4- Biological Resources, the IS states that for the purposes of the MND, the breeding bird season includes "...February 1 through August 310: Because not all species adhere to these nesting dates,the Department encourages the Lead Agency to complete nesting bird surveys regardless of time of year to ensure compliance with all applicable laws related to nesting birds and birds of prey. The Department recommends that the City revise Mitigation Measure 1, Section 4, and require avian surveys, regardless of time of year, to ensure that the project complies with all federal, state, and local laws. The Department appreciates the opportunity to comment on the IS and proposed MND for the Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566 Project (SCH No. 2014121079.), and requests that the City address. the Department's comments and concerns prior to adoption of the MND: If you should have any questions pertaining to these comments, please contact Gabriele Quillman at (909)980-3818 or at gabdele.quillman@wildlife.ca.gov. Sincerely, / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIMONGA e I Mac r A 'ng Regional Manager JAN 2 6 2015 cc: State Clearinghouse, SacramentoRE CEIVED - PLANNING a Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 and Development.Review DRC2014- 00566 Project SCH No. 2014121079 Page 5 of 5 Literature Cited California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 2012. Staff report on burrowing owl mitigation: State of California, Natural Resources Agency. Available for download at: http://dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongpme/survey_monitor.htmi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JAN 2 6 2015 RECEIVED - PLANNING i . T S{Op s 3 o � , eJ " F KI, f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEC 0 9 2014 RECEIVED - PLANNING January . X:.. of .. low ■ :'. .A, Project Overview • Applicant: Jaswinders and Lakhbir Kour Sondh • Original Entitlement: Conditional Use Permit DRC2009-00308 • Zoning : Community Commercial Terra Vista Community Plan • Original Expiration Date: February 10, 2015 • New Expiration Date with Time Extension : February 10, 2017 m H U INI fi Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: • Approve Time Extension DRC2014-01076 2fcl-n C RANCHO January 28, 2015 �,4k RANCHO CU(:AMONGA CALIFORNIA • Site Characteristics: Project Details • Located at the northwest corner of the Rancho Etiwanda Estates • Subject property is 37.43 acres in size • Within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP) • Surrounded by single-family residences to the south and east • Project site was previously rough graded • Project Characteristics: • Design Review of 95 single-family homes • Floor Plans range in size from 2,689 s.f. to 4,055 s.f. • Final phase of a 632 -unit master planned community • Remaining street improvements and landscape to be completed concurrently. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA E:F1V1U F1F11Ur1Lai 1-►bbUbb111U11L The Planning Department Staff has determined that: • The Design Review is within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Review that was certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001, and there are no new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Review. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA L>•1 -4 -ITU -4nol;� Roof: Concrete 'S Tile Roof Pitch: 4'12 Rake Dimension: 6 Faye Dimension: 12' Garage Doors: Style specific carriage door Exterior Materials: Smooth Sand Finish Stucco Architectural Details: O Decorative stacked file gable vents, (2) shed roof "awning" with decorative wood braces, ® stylized corbels, ® stucco window, head and sill trim, (9) exposed rafter tails, ® carriage style garage door. Able RANEHO U(AMONGA Elevations Residence Two - Bungalow Roof: Concrete 'SlateTle Root Pitch: 4:12 Rake Dimension: 24' Eave Dimension: 24" Gage Doors: Style specific carriage door Exterior Material: Light sand stucco, shingle siding, stone Architectural Details: 0 Decorative beams and brackets at gables. ® stone wainscot and at porch column bases, T wood shingle siding. ® stucco window head, jamb and sill trim. T wood window head. jamb and sill trim. (9) wood railing, 0carriage style garage door. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA Mesiaence Mancn Roof% Concrete 'Slate' Tie Exterior Material: Light sand stucco. board & batten siring Roof Pitch: 4:12 Architectural Details: © Decorative louvered gable vents. Rake Dimension: 18" 9 built -out gable with board & batten siding, ® louvered Eave Dimension: 24" shutters. © stucco window head, jamb and sill trim, Garage Doors: Style specific carriage door 0 carriage style garage door. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA rn.v... .I..,..�.., 0 MATERIAL NOTES FOR RANCH ELEVATION STYLE Roof: Concrete 'S Tile Roof Pitch: 4'12 Rake Dimension: 24" Eave Dimension: 6" Garage Doors: Style specitic carriage door Imperfect smooth stucco Architectural Details: (D Decorative candles, B decora- tive louvered shutters. ® wood balcony, beams, and railing, ® stucco window head and sill trim, ® exposed rafter tails, ® carriage style garage door RAAZHO UCAMONGA Phases of construction proposed: 23 4-6 units per Phase Phasing Plan L P. lPo» . / VM , . t.. IYE�YFD � DRC 2014 TA 20 DRC 2014-00820 TRACT No. 16226-2, L0T8 1-95 RANCHO E %AfANDA ESTATES i PHASING PLAN, MY CF MOO CUCNAONO4 COLIM CF SM SERIMM, SPATE OF CN.FORU Sheet 2 of 23 RXN� ,HO CUCAMONGA VALIFORNLA, Development Standards and Design Guidelines • The project is in compliance with all applicable required development standards, such as: — setbacks, building height and lot coverage • The project meets the ENSP architectural design guidelines for the Upper Etiwanda neighborhood. — The homes incorporate styles and materials that are true to each architectural theme. — 8 building footprints are required and provided — 4 elevations per footprint are required and provided RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA Committee Meetings • A neighborhood meeting for Design Review DRC2014-00620 was held in the Creative Corner room at Central Park on December 1, 2014. • The Technical and Design Review Committees reviewed the project on December 16, 2014. — No major or minor issues were raised at any of these meetings. — DRC and TRC recommended approval to the Planning Commission. RA.N�HO CU(AMONGA CALIFORNIA Based on the environmental review and the project's compliance with Municipal Code requirements, staff recommends approval of Design Review DRC2014-00620. Planning Commission 7 7R��°�, January 28, 2015 CALIFORNIA Tentative Tract Map S U BTT 18961 -. eLom D a.. .I 7��1. i r At:. RANCHO • Site Characteristics: Project Details • Located at northeast corner of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane • Contains a single-family house • Within the Very Low Residential Zoning District • Surrounded by Very Low Residential Zoning District to the north, south, east and west • Subject property is 4.75 acres in size • Project Characteristics: • Subdivision of one parcel into seven parcels • Completion of project adjacent street improvements (Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane) and the creation of a new cul-de-sac (Brittany Court) • Installation of new equestrian trail and drainage facilities • The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects); there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment RANEHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA Proposed subdivision involves the creation of 7 lots from 1 existing parcel: Lot 1 — 40,000 s.f. Lot 2 — 22,004 s.f. Lot 3 — 25,831 s.f. Lot 4 — 21,786 s.f. Lot 5 — 27,233 s.f. Lot 6 — 21,780 s.f. Lot 7 — 25,208 s.f. Average Lot Size — 26,270 s.f. Tentative Tract Map ..a , E x 19 MOM.. ��. NCHO ►MONGA Committee Meetings • A neighborhood meeting for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961 was conducted at Floyd M. Stork Elementary School on August 20, 2014. • The Technical and Design Review Committees reviewed the project on September 2, 2014. • The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the project on October 8, 2014. • A second (follow up) neighborhood meeting was held on Tuesday, October 21, 2014. RANCHO U(AMONGA • A petition, signed by 38 neighboring residents, was submitted prior to the November 12, 2014 Planning Commission meeting. — The letter requested that the development be more integrated into the community. • During the November 12, 2014 PC meeting, residents addressed drainage concerns. — Property owners to the south want to make sure that future drainage of the subject property will not impact them. RANEHO ;ALIFORNIA I 1 I ,I I j _ II CAI'PHIFE ET0.l'CT i � 1 .: WlJE vi•xr Ecnema J z x�o RAN HO rl rM•• •_V Y V•••••• V•• M M r• V•• Based on the environmental review and the project's compliance with Municipal Code requirements, staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961. ,w f f1 4k lk I 1,4 f f1 lk I h 41 .'r R w 4 ` 1 r! �\1 L`51 �_\�. Ao } �'� ': .. �' <;., �^ �{�/'` �4_ J v. f"{ !Fi ,; JRa 4_' I I - A 11 PWI E k4m 4 7t.4 lo'�— 'Im f Ar WIN Ww 4N, A '� VNt Pik- ob fb.' t 1'p �,qd,,6 ., FE I. lind "ill I I � 1, � 1 5 � �! Y- ti Y A �atA A RA:.NCHO CUC.AMONGA CALIFORNIA Planning Commission January 28, 2015 Design Review DRC2014-00207 tsaCKgrouna • Previous Planning Commission action: — Public hearing on August 23, 2006. — Approved SUBTT16578 — A 6 -lot residential subdivision. Tentative Tract Map 16578 recorded in September 2014. — Approved Mitigated Negative Declaration. • Current proposal includes: — Design Review DRC2014-00207 — Architectural design of the proposed 6 homes. RANCHO CU(:AMONGA CALIFORNIA • Design Review DRC2014-00207: — Single -Story Elevations on Lots 3 & 4. — Architectural Theme: Lot 3 — Bungalow, Lot 4 — Craftsman. — Floor Plans range in size from 4,067 square feet to 4,110 square feet. — Two -Story Elevations on Lots 1, 2, 5, & 6. — Architectural Theme: Lot 1 — American Farmhouse, Lot 2 — Craftsman, Lot 5 —American Farmhouse, Lot 6 — Spanish. — Floor Plans range in size from 4,035 square feet to 4,146 square feet. mr r I. Y v = an'p�11H 03 1 7 c cu CL a) Cl) RANEHO UCAMONGA Lot 1 -American Farmhouse ;1'. Jw' r too 2 loll 66E6 60 6 1�8 L�Igo mak--� u, Il Il IJ17 10Io 17 1717 1017 --loll lag | =4A. RANCHO Lot 3 - Bungalow RANCHO UCAMONGA Lot 4 - Craftsman 3! LOT 4 - EA5T ELEVATION (CRAFT5MAW ' - ... LOT 4 - NORTH ELEVATION (CRAFTSMAN! FULA 7 _ s � LOT 4 - HE5T =VATION (6RAMMAW " 3 'R7�S LOT 4 -SOUTH ELEVATION (CRAFTSMAN) 4 A-4.0 RANCHO UC:AMONGA Lot 5 - American Farmhouse D ---------------- - _ _ - ------------ • -� vo -- 00 �o _ -,--------------------- - - 9 A� At 01 OR .o gg c�7�' Qo ioiG 'x•173 cin q I�7 ¢�A g�o —— — ■Cs w MN II II 43 [fl, 11 Not 9 Fl I w RANCHO r ■ ■ V ■ ■ V ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ V ■ ■ %0%0% ■ ■ \ V V ■ V V V • Environmental Review: — The Planning Commission approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tract 16578 on August 23, 2006. — Mitigation Monitoring Program for Tract 16578 includes: • Short term air quality emissions during construction activity. • Long term air quality emissions from operational activity. • Grading impacts to air quality and drainage. • Noise impacts during construction and operational activity. — CEQA provides that no further environmental review Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the previous Negative Declaration. ir Negative scope of a RaTNEHO Staff Conclusion Recommends Approval of DRC2014-00207, subject to conditions of approval. RXNCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNUa Planning Commission January 28, 2015 Conditional Use Permit D RC2014-00915 American Multi -Cinema (AMC) Theater J tex" F RANCHO CUCAMONGA . CALIFORNIA Background • Existing use includes: — AMC 12 Theater. — 61,283 square feet of floor area and 2,190 seats distributed among 12 theaters. — Concessions & hot food. — Video game area. RANEHO Proposal • Proposed modification includes: — Removal of video game area. — Upgrade existing concession area to provide expanded food and non-food alcoholic beverage options. — Installation of "MacGuffins" for sale of beer, wine, & liquor. — Requires ABC Type 47 license (On -Sale General for Bona Fide Public Eating Place). — No seats in MacGuffins area; patrons take beverage to their seat. — No hostess service; patrons must buy alcoholic beverage at MacGuffins. — One (1) alcoholic beverage may be purchased at a time. — Hours of alcohol sales are 10:30 am to 12:30 am, daily. pr C-�Gr A Xi 1, v A. SITE PLAN AMC Victona Gardens 12 Theatre 12500 North Ma,nstreet, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 UE SITE PLAN AMC Victona Gardens 12 Theatre 12500 North Ma,nstreet, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 RANEHO ;UCAMONGA . CALIFORMIA Enlarged Site Plan 0) VICTORIA CARDl N5 RSxcao Cuc•xonua, C1t�tD1M1• W n W Aw Oaoda Garden i�eave U A .. W N C L J F f r � �ym U D c o = 2 c 6 � � f ° � a.>� rc va'uitJ ar nwu U '^ < xo cmSnaxRo rtx xA:mla ¢ r J� M9lm x! amx a. mn tui o V "A xp WpARO qM Me, Z EXHIBIT B-1 CINEMA a� Existing MacGuffins RANEHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA • City of Ontario: — CUP for MacGuffins was approved, but facility has not yet opened. • City of Burbank: — CUP for MacGuffins was approved; facility open for short time, no issues. • City of Tustin: — Permitted Use. Facility open since 2007. No alcohol related issues. • ABC & RC Sheriff's Department — Consulted both and they have no concerns as long as their conditions are imposed. RANCHO RANEHO CU('.AMONGA CALIFORNIA Conclusion Staff Recommends Approval of DRC2014-00915, subject to conditions of approval. — Wrist bands for those 21 & older purchasing alcohol. — Different style cups for alcoholic beverage. — Sale of 1 alcoholic beverage at a time. — Zero tolerance for minors in possession of alcohol. — Certified Server Training. — Hours of operation — 10:30 am to 12:30 am for sales, & 10:30 am to 1:30 am for consumption, daily. — Alcohol Service shall be made only from concession stands, no hostess service. — Designated driver program. — Taxi -ride program for intoxicated patrons. — Monitor individual theaters every 30 minutes. — Provide sufficient security. — Sheriff's Department may require additional security if issues arise. r Project Entitlements Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18976 Design Review DRC2014-00570 January 28, 2015 rw"s 9 /- /-/ Project Overview • Applicant: Crestwood Communities • Proposed Development: 31 -unit detached multi -family project • Zoning: Medium Residential (8 -14 DU acre) • Proposed Density: 10.3 DU acre • Development Code: Complies with all requirements • Parking: 4 over minimum requirement Medium SPITt 1. s 71, Site i Future Park PW General Commercial 1 I 11 F > -- 11 t Sierra View Ct y r A- I. Arro cute ,, -M Stir Medium ;: L L �f I, i, I6 +y 20 19 18 17 r 16 15 -" j - I14 15 4— -- za za zz zi 4y rr— 112 21 22 31 30 29 JnIT I o a _ TO1� IOT I 10 23 24 j M25 I 26 I 27 28 i - -- _ -- �i MN2R �I t 2 3 4 5 6 RWI] �y 1 J MN �r� � � � �� ♦moi SL+37 `� � iy 0� n li Ilk . 0 10 I= I LEFT ELEVATION'A' FRONT ELEVATION'A' Scheme 2 RIGHT ELEVATION'A' REAR ELEVATION'A' SPANISH F] IF] t •i: F► L F � A m D zQ F 3Z C to m D Q Z Q D Z D_ u r i m � m r Q I� ® n I LEFT ELEVATION MATERIAL NOTES Raaf. Cancmte'S' Tile Roof Pitch: 4 : 12 Flakes: Flush Ems: 12' SalrBrg HOW 1W-0- Sbc Eberfor Yaod GrNkroA Denw Foam )Dors & Wlndms On Stuck yrought hors Awants Iqh-Density Foam Shutten r.A AA ArA M� :L FRONT ELEVATION Scheme 2 RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION CAFW Initial Stud Comments • Staff received comments from CAFW on January 15th • CAFW recommended that the applicant be required to do a Burrowing Owl Survey prior to approval of a grading permit. — Burrowing Owl survey condition of approval added. • CAFW recommended that the proposed Nesting Bird mitigation measure be modified to require a Nesting Bird survey prior to approval of a grading permit anytime of the year that grading occurs, rather than only during nesting season. — Nesting Bird mitigation measure updated Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: • Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration • Approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18976 • Approve Development Review DRC2014-00570 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA v January 28, 2015 • Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 — Subdivision of a parcel of about 1.89 acres into 8 lots; • Development Review DRC2014-00645 — Construction of 8 single-family residences; and • Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581 .;:I Breda of th project situ s "b dif 1.8t'- ,. tjt) t= •� BASE LINE" - rn pow v r y Tract�- Igte-Farni'IN, COLONIAL R e c;iHantis' ..a I ,1 3 PLO 1 i � Nuu9u=?% p Vis. r`IL t lop s a o _ 1 1 e 1 yyty I ,1 3 PLO 1 i � Nuu9u=?% p Vis. r`IL t lop s It Zoning Map and General Plan Land Use Designations BASE LINE WI4= '1 Low Medium Residential (4 - 8 du/ac) Low Medium Residential (4 - 8 du/ac) Project Site Low Medium Residential (4 - 8 du/ac) Low Medium Residential (4 - 8 du/ac) COLONIAL N olrth RA-NCHO SUBTT18966 • All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; • Individual lot areas range between 9,311 square feet (Lot 4) and 11,814 square feet (Lot 5) - the average lot area is 10,206 square feet; and • Access will be via existing streets: Emmett Way and Shelby Place. The lots will not `front' onto Base Line Road. W . -4 1�� y R t'4 Al coz 700 3h��pBBp®ep$$�gqepyEEyee � ai5155 1�F Ihel � qui "� �q R �YF!5 'RAR • • h !' s Q 1 &$ E e Y y p li 3 �€e Ez•�.i ip ai � • 1 �i9qi � Cpl ♦ e. �� � 9• R� 5a �` ', se f • � @i. E q � �I OOtl0-18-ISG-001/ :fMV b A� 0000 -19 -ISO -001f :fldi' — V R®\ cc f z� --- -- -- -- -- Mll L L6 s o 3 .� • • 9 Y, (' • a 1 IS p m I I �_ �— -- --- — — --- — —pp — `h4 L 4• q q A RR R L�� ��- - _ 0000-�Z-110-0011 :NdV 0000 -6f -l10-0011 �NdY RANCHO CUCAMON( A .. CALIFORNIA DRC2014-00645 • The applicant proposes to construct 8 single-family residences; • Two architectural themes that will incorporate a variety of materials and have `articulated' footprints and profiles; • Three distinct footprints and `reverse' footprints of each for a total of 6 footprints; and • The floor area of the houses range between 3,440 SF (Plan 1) and 4,616 SF (Plan 3). LL Cf) Q qq RHR KL LL i = MT1O SE F'_O PAN 5 , y -0 C PLAN 13MEW.Wk.P W RANCHO CUGAMONGA, GA 91739 1S R�pv A -P2.1 'ABUWALO ' A21Yi-•-.- I GAPRpf 1p11 wMM4-11-11 dWAT ���I lit+188[�Am ®mMAfiC nsno�� ®��n jxmvAarAa u n� �1� G0.RTYNm . FIRST FLOM PLAN SO , 1/4'.1_0• 4140 SF SE F'_O PAN 5 , y -0 WNGLZ FAMILY IIOMUB PLAN 13MEW.Wk.P W RANCHO CUGAMONGA, GA 91739 1S R�pv A -P2.1 'ABUWALO ' A21Yi-•-.- I GAPRpf 1p11 wMM4-11-11 Ht)rff8. LLC ���I lit+188[�Am ®mMAfiC nsno�� ®��n jxmvAarAa u n� �1� MP I LL cn co T� W ai LL cn co T� W u i i 0 D \i y i$ I I b H .M I F l, � § � J a) / 0 § § § § ( A 0 €�� w LL r_ G 9 A Tree Removal Permit RANCEHO DRC2014-00581 CU(AMONGA CALIFORNIA • The proposed project includes the removal of nine trees located along the north side of the project site; • Only one of these trees qualify as a "heritage" tree subject to the City's preservation requirements as described in the Development Code; • A replacement tree of 15 -gallons in size will be required to be planted; and • This replacement tree will be in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. RANCHO UCAMONGA Review Timeline • Initial Submittal (TTM) —April 1, 2014 • Initial Submittal (DR) — July 10, 2014 • Completeness Determination — October 2014 • Neighborhood Meeting — November 19, 2014 • Committee Reviews — November 18, 2014 • Planning Commission — January 28, 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA • Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project; • Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, Staff determined that, with mitigation measures incorporated to address impacts to, for example, air quality, biological resources, water quality, and noise there is no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment; Environmental Assessment RAN�Ho (continued) CUCAMONGA CALIFORMA • A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and public notice for comment and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration was provided; • Staff did not receive any comments from the public or agencies such the South Coast Air Quality Management District and California Department of Fish and Wildlife during this review period in response to the Mitigated Negative Declaration. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA • This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper; • The property was posted; • Notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site; • Staff did not receive any correspondence or phone calls in response to the public notification. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA Staff Recommends Approval of the following by adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval: • Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 • Development Review DRC2014-00645 • Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581 Planning Commission ..nk� [ONGA January 28, 2015 �1tN1A • Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 — amendment of the Code to allow the construction and operation of logistics buildings with a floor area of 50,000 square feet or more in the Industrial Park Districts; Development Review DRC2014-00566 — Construction and operation of a logistics building of 116,480 square feet; and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845 _- a area of the project site is 5.72 acre s - �5 est) Yto Indus rlal Q e ENTERPRISE' Lb AV f 4 � _• �'` ' Project Situ �� � � ,' �` 'COMMERCE CENTER ,. ` to f � ' ii -.i f� � eSF 13 ❑ 11 la^11 fP °33'��s{)r��B'( y i 1 fn] I STREE Zoning Map and General Plan Land Use Designations Urban Residential/Medium Residential (in City of Ontario) TERPRISE CE CENTER North RAINCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA ------- - ----- Project Description • The applicant proposes to construct a logistics building of about 116,480 square feet; • The office area will be located at the southeast corner of the building while the dock area with 18 dock doors will be located on the east side of the building; • There will be two points of access — one via driveways at the southwest and southeast corners, respectively, of the project site. ,'Ili-, 1SI.- JIi.L 1-1 Ma EBIHo&AL DRIM &R3YNfl ®H i c 4HJIL:M r — ..^_ ,.' 4TH VREETI , �.__—_—_—_—__ 5 YFpP 1 Office 133&& F4 I�lt PROPERTY OY ER ADORESS OF THE PROPERTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL HHNSEA LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPLK: W APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE SITE PUN KEYNOTES ,MW. -M� .�= in.vr-�n�k. SHEETINDEX cm rxxvPrncu� zi IA10lAS sw niaPcx .. PROJECT DATA smnxT mu .�Mm v m.mmwP ...m.ew.m .xm.nwes NM RAH DIE GML NDTM .�n SH4 LEGEND .rm. .-jj-... ...... v .......: • m �" vp �asw MR .eew.fr. C Ell NM RAH DIE GML NDTM SH4 LEGEND .rm. .-jj-... ...... v .......: m •m...0 rv.w � �2'a'� .eew.fr. C Ell pfalm YramelmKuwhy Dm �slaa xw ODBmCIIW TYPE PROPOSED PL PALETTE • .m. xev _ m.....� �M • ..i.w<rc .•s.....c xw. - n emxou�ar u. � uwrwxwr .ex. roc a oa.xxn�aru �w - me�mie.six.mmnm we PMIUXsLOT ThCCGLCUNTpXdsunx��nnmmi.. LANDSCAPE DESIGN STATEMENT WATER CONSERVATION NOTES Development Review RANCHO DRC2014-00566 CU(AMONGA CALIFORMA (continued) • The proposed building will be of concrete tilt -up construction painted with a palette of two colors - blue and shades of grey; • There will be sandblasted concrete accents along the wall plane and metal accents at the office area; and • Generous amounts of blue -tinted glass have been provided at the office area and at various locations along the wall planes of the building. dot e.- pnq �� RANEH0 UC:AMONGA DRC2014-00567 • The Code currently does not Storage, and Distribution — corresponding buildings for Industrial Park Districts; permit "Wholesale, Medium", and the such uses, in the • The Code does permit "Wholesale, Distribution — Light". However, the buildings for such uses are limited 50,000 square feet in floor area; Storage, and corresponding to less than 15. Storage Yard. The storage of various materials outside of a structure other than fencing, either as an accessory or principal use. 16. Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Heavy. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, warehousing, storage, freight handling, shipping, trucking services and terminals, and storage and wholesaling from the premises of unfinished, raw, or semi -refined products requiring further processing, fabrication, or manufacturing. Typical uses include, but are not limited to, trucking firms, and the wholesaling of metals, minerals, and agricultural products. Outdoor storage is permitted. 17. Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Light. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, wholesaling, storage, and warehousing services and storage and wholesale to retailers from the premises of finished goods and food products. Activities under this classification shall be conducted in enclosed buildings and occupy 50,000 square feet or less of building space. Retail sales from the premises may occur when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. 18. Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Medium. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, wholesale, storage, and warehousing services; moving and storage services; storage and wholesaling to retailers from the premises of finished goods and food products; and distribution facilities for large-scale retail firms. Activities under this classification shall be conducted in enclosed buildings and occupy greater than 50,000 square feet of building space. Included are multi -tenant or speculative buildings with over 50,000 square feet of warehouse space. 17.32-21 RXNCHO CUC:AMONGA CALIFORNIA DRC2014-00567 • Per the General Plan and Development Code, the maximum floor area ratio permitted in the Industrial Park District is 60 percent; • In order to construct a building of 50,000 square feet or more and still comply with the maximum floor area ratio, the minimum parcel size upon which such a building could be built is 83,333 square feet (0.60 x 83,333 = 50,000); RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA DRC2014-00567 Status of Parcel Located within the Industrial Park (IP) District) Area Equal to or Greater than 83,333 Square Feet Have the Potential for Development Not within the Haven Avenue Overlay District Available for a Building of 50,000+ Square Feet in Floor Area Number of Parcels 557 557 — 430 = 127 34 — 11 = 23 23 Archibald Ave Hermosa Ave Haven Ave Milliken Ave Baker Ave if' N 0e � fw D ' � T o S -_ 'm o CO � a Rochester Ave -0 W N�\ /r� 0 \V N rh D su O h 00 W 0 C CD CD CD e� O 0 on N N m ai a Rochester Ave -0 W N�\ /r� 0 \V N rh D su O h 00 W 0 C CD CD CD e� O 0 on Archibald Ave Hermosa Ave Haven Ave Milliken Ave R ^^N CL .5 V ai Cr F mo WN 0 CD lrG r CD 0 m ct a Baker Ave N Z � rte,•'• D T o S � � m m o c co � m a e 0 jL O S S N co m � W a Eff]I 1 f f Rochester Ave R ^^N CL .5 V ai Cr F mo WN 0 CD lrG z Baker Ave Archibald Ave D r O y 'm o m m c � m o. Hermosa Ave Haven Ave a N E m m W a a u Milliken Ave Rochester Ave RA:N( ,HO CU(:AMONGA CALIFORNIA • Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project; • Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, Staff determined that, with mitigation measures incorporated to address impacts to, for example, air quality, biological resources, water quality, and noise there is no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment; Tree Removal Permit RAN�H� DRC2014-00845 CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA • The proposed project includes the removal of five trees located along the south side of the project site; • Only one of these trees qualify as a "heritage" tree subject to the City's preservation requirements as described in the Development Code; • A replacement tree of 15 -gallons in size will be required to be planted; and • This replacement tree will be in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new industrial development. RA:cxO CU AMONGA CALIFORNIA • Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project; • Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, Staff determined that, with mitigation measures incorporated to address impacts to, for example, air quality, biological resources, water quality, and noise there is no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment; RA-NCHO UCAMONGA Environmental Assessment (continued) • A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and public notice for comment and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration was provided; • During this review period in response to the Mitigated Negative Declaration Staff received comments from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW); Office of Historic Preservation (OHP); and the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works (SBCO DPW). Environmental Assessment RANCHO CUCAMONGA (continued) California Dept. of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW): Impacts to the Burrowing Owl and migrating birds Response: New conditions added to the Resolution specific action be completed construction; of approval have been of Approval requiring by the applicant prior to Office of Historic Preservation (OHP): Impacts to archaeological resources Response: Mitigations in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are sufficient for minimizing impacts; and - `�=�' Environmental Assessment RANCHO (continued) CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA • San Bernardino County Public Works (SBCO DPW): Consideration of percolation and storm water runoff Response: The Low Impact Principals implemented in the Water Quality Management Plan will address water percolation within the project site; and Storm water runoff is not affected by the amendment. Buildings of 50,000 square feet or more are already permitted in the subject development district — the amendment only allows for the construction and operation of logistics buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet. RANCHO CU(:AMONGA CALIFORNIA • This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Bulletin newspaper; • The property was posted; • Notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site; • No comments were received by Staff in response to the public notifications. RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,_ CALIFORNIA v v• • v 0 v v 0 v• • Staff Recommends Approval of the following by adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval: • Development Review DRC2014-00566 • Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845 RA=NCHO ONGA Staff Recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the resolutions recommending the City Council approve the following: • Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567