Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2015-02-11-Agenda Packet-PC-HPC
!r THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKSHOP OF FvNCHO CuoNca THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 11, 2015 - 7:00 PM* Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center ***RAINS ROOM*** 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California FIF I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Wimberly_ Vice Chairman Oaxaca oMunoz_ Howdyshell_ Fletcher_ II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to rive minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,making loud noises,or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. FiF III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION A. PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP DRC2014-01096—LEWIS RETAIL CENTERS -Preliminary site plan and architectural review of a proposed 92,235 square foot commercial center including a change in land use from Medium (M) Residential to Village Commercial(VC)for a site located within the Victoria Community Plan(VCP)at • the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road;APN: 1089-031-15, 16 and 35. PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP FEBRUARY 11, 2015 ,O Page 2 ox IV. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois J. Schrader,Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee,hereby certify that a true,accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 5,2015,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." . Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These r.. O PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP FEBRUARY 11, 2015 c,� Page 3 ox documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested parry who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,533 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us 0 1 Vicinity Map Planning Commission Workshop FEBRUARY 11 2015 L , -.... �• ' i i Li I ,..Ji jc c ---•-•--• i m E ' ° i V dc _ _ A m . � � I � � V C g 19th St i 1 lrlc: Base Line Base Line 1 4NF Church i Church Foothill 1 Foothill N Arnow Arrow Cl m = a 1 rsey 8th p� a U 6thc � 6th W a 4t _ = g 4th A >� Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center DO, Item A: DRC2014-01096 } r STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMEW Date: February 11, 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Subject: PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP DRC2014-01096 — LEWIS RETAIL CENTERS - Preliminary site pran and-architectural-f6view-of-a proposed 92,235 square foot commercial center including a General Plan land use change from Low-Medium Residential (LM) to Village Commercial (VC) and a Victoria Community Plan Amendment from Medium (M) Residential to Village Commercial (VC) for a site within the Victoria Community Plan (VCP), located at the northwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1089-031-15, 16, and 35. PROJECT BACKGROUND: The applicant proposes developing the 10.64-acre project site located at the northwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road with a 92,235 square foot commercial center, with Stater Brothers Market as the anchor tenant. The project site is made up of 9.78 acres the • applicant is purchasing form the Rancho Cucamonga Successor Agency, 0.69 acre the applicant is in the process of leasing or purchasing from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and a 0.17-acre easement. In totality, the applicant is purchasing 13.78 acres from the Rancho Cucamonga Successor Agency, of which 4 acres will remain for the development of a future senior housing project. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Low Medium (LM) residential; the Victoria Plan Community zoning designation is Medium (M) Residential. The site is bordered by a Rancho Cucamonga Fire Station and vacant land zoned Low Medium (LM) Residential within the Victoria Community Plan) to the north; vacant land zoned Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RR/OC) to the south, across Base Line Road; residential development zoned Low Medium (LM) to the east, across Day Creek Boulevard; and, a San Bernardino Flood Control District maintenance yard zoned Low Medium (LM) to the west. Development- of the- site will require-that both the General Plarr- and- the Victoria Community Plan land use designation be amended to Village Commercial (VC), which permits shopping centers with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The portion of the site designated to become a senior housing development will need to be rezoned so that the General Plan, Victoria Community Plan and Zoning Map are consistent. REQUIRED ENTITLEMENTS: The development of the project site with a commercial center will require the following entitlements: 1. Design Review- $10,010 2. Tentative Tract Map— $14,420 3. Initial Environmental Study - $2,715 4. General Plan Amendment- $12,210 5. Victoria Community Plan Amendment- $4,259 • 6. Conditional Use Permit- $3,035 Item A-1 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT DRC2014-01096—LEWIS RETAIL CENTERS February 11, 2015 Page 2 Project Design and Layout: The project is designed with a Craftsman-inspired architectural theme that includes wood siding, stone veneer, exposed rafter tails, and wood support structures. Each building incorporates multiple tower elements, including a clock tower that provides the major pedestrian access from Firehouse Court. Wood trellises and green screens with climbing vines are used to accent each building and tie all of the buildings together. The project is oriented with the 44,998 square foot major tenant building angled towards the intersection of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road, with the smaller shop tenants plotted either adjacent to the major tenant building or the public street. Three drive-thru food service businesses and a drive-thru drug - store are-proposed;-each-drive-thrix-lane-will-be--required-to-be--screened from-view-.—K landscaped-patio--- directly rom-view/landscaped-patio--- directly adjacent to the Day Creek/Base Line intersection will serve as the focal point of the development and as the major pedestrian access point. A secondary pedestrian orientated focal point is proposed for the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Firehouse Court that will include a horse hitching rail and bike rack/repair'station to service the adjacent Pacific Electric community trail. Multiple outdoor patio areas will be provided throughout the project. The main vehicle entrances will be from a proposed signalized intersection on Base Line road and an existing signalized entrance from Firehouse Court. A secondary right-in/right-out entrance will be provided south of Firehouse Court on Day Creek Boulevard. A wall with a view obscuring gate is proposed around the San Bernardino County Flood Control maintenance yard to screen it from the commercial center. STAFF COMMENTS: Planning Department Overall, the Planning staff is pleased with conceptual design and layout of the project and is in support of the applicant's request to change the General Plan and Victoria Plan land use designation of the project site to Village Commercial (VC). The buildings are well-designed, include extensive use wood and stone veneer siding, and each wall and roof plane is articulated. All buildings within the commercial center will be required to adhere to a common architectural theme, including each of the pad buildings. The project will provide a visually appealing street scene that includes multiple pedestrian-access-points-from the each intersection and from the Pacific Electric community trail. Staff, though, is concerned that four (4) proposed drive-thru lanes are too many for the size of the project, creating pedestrian and vehicle access issues and limiting the amount of landscaping that can be planted around the buildings. The proposed layout will require amending the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) to permit the proposed building setbacks along both public streets. The VCP currently does not include setback requirements for commercial developments, but rather directs one to use the commercial standards outlined in the Development Code. Staff is supportive of the reduced setbacks as it will provide the opportunity to create a more pedestrian orientated project with similar setbacks to the commercial buildings across the street, as measured from Base Line Road. The applicant will be required to submit a traffic study for the project verifying that there is adequate vehicle staking for each of the drive-thru lanes. Item A-2 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT • DRC2014-01096-LEWIS RETAIL CENTERS February 11, 2015 Page 3 Staff recommends the following changes to enhance the project: 1. The pedestrian focal point at the corner of Firehouse Court and Day Creek Boulevard should be enhanced to include benches, a water fountain and possibly picnic tables to better serve the users of the Pacific Electric community trail. 2. The drive-thru lane.for the proposed coffee tenant in Building 5 may not be adequately sized to service this type of tenant and may create queueing and congestion issues in this part of the center. It is recommended that the length of the drive-thru be extended to the greatest extent -- possible--and that-overflow vehicles- be-directed-to the southernmost drive aisle fo avoid blocking two drive aisles. 3. The drive—thru lane adjacent to Building 5 cuts off the parking area from the front (north side) of the building, requiring pedestrians to cross through the drive-thru lane and loading area to access the front entrance to the building. This area should be redesigned to improve this pedestrian connection. 4. The drive-thru configuration adjacent to the proposed drug store (Major B) is awkwardly designed and requires vehicles to make a sharp tum upon entering the center from Firehouse Court. The applicant has informed staff that drug store drive-thru lanes are lightly used and that the proposed • design is the best compromise. Staff believes that at minimum a landscaped roundabout be added adjacent to the drive-thru to assist in directing traffic and minimize unconventional vehicle turning movements in this area. 5. Staff concludes that four(4) proposed drive-thru lanes are too numerous for the size the project site and could adversely impact onsite circulation. It should be noted that the adjacent project on the southeast corner of the same intersection does not have any drive-thru lanes and does not have an issue attracting tenants. 6. Additional landscaping should be added to screen each drive-thru lane from the adjacent public streets and decorative paving should be added in front of the major tenant building. Engineering Services Department: 1. An additional median break and traffic signal on Base Line Road is not on the City's master plan list. Provide a traffic signal warrant analysis for the proposed driveway near the west end of the project. The study shall also include development of the 31-acre parcel at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard. a. It is likely the combination of eastbound and westbound left turn stacking at the two signals will leave no room for landscaping in the median between the two traffic signals, only a 4-foot strip of cobble. Since access will be provided to the Flood Control District maintenance facility, the existing median break shall be closed and median landscaping installed from the new median break to Day Creek Channel. • Item A-3 I\ PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT DRC2014-01096-LEWIS RETAIL CENTERS February 11, 2015 Page 4 b. There will be no Transportation Development Fee credit for the traffic signal and the issue of maintenance responsibility will need to be discussed. 2. Provide a trip generation' and trip distribution analysis. Based on these studies, a Traffic Impact Analysis may be required if 50 or more peak hour trips affect any intersection. 3. Provide written confirmation that San Bernardino County Flood Control District will allow the proposed Pad B on their property. - a:-- Ifa--portion of the access-drive aisle depends on an off=site easement,tfiafeaaement-shall b6___ acquiredprior to Planning Commission approval of a tentative parcel map. 4. Provide a master plan for the 4-acre residential parcel to the north and for the 31-acre parcel at the southwest corner of Base Line and Day Creek Boulevard. a. We understand the Fire Safety Division will require a secondary access to the residential parcel from the shopping center parcel, presumably near the west property line. 5. The drive approaches shall be at least 35 feet wide. The maximum width is 50 feet, with 20-foot drive aisles on both sides of a 10-foot driveway median, not 5 feet as shown between Pads A and B. a: If the Base Line Road entrance is signalized, a "street type" driveway shall be provided with a catch basin on the upstream side of the driveway. 6. This property will be served by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU). RCMU facilities currently end at the southeast comer of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard. Concurrently with development of the proposed site, RCMU would like to extend their line to serve the existing Fire Station to the north. 7. Overhead utilities on Base Line Road shall be placed underground from the last line pole on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard to the first line pole west of the west project boundary. The developer is eligible for reimbursement from the properties across the street. Building and Safety Services Department (Fire): 1. Fire Department access plans must be prepared for this site and must include a second point of access to the 4-acre residential project to the north of the commercial site (please reference RCFPD Standard 5-1 for Fire lane specifications). 2. Provide a fire flow letter from the Cucamonga Valley Water District to verify the available fire flow at the site. Item A-4 r f PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT • DRC2014-01096—LEWIS RETAIL CENTERS February 11, 2015 Page 5 Respectfully submitted, l Candyce B eft Planning Director CB:TV/ge Attachments:-- Exhibit A--- Applicant Presentation Package--------------- Item A-5 • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA gCHOTHE REGULAR MEETINGS OF cur-AMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 11, 2015 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER • Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Wimberly_ Vice Chairman Oaxaca Munoz_ Howdyshell_ Fletcher II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to Five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA �O FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 2 III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION' A. Approval of Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) minutes dated January 14, 2015 B. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated January 28, 2015 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. C. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00583 - CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - Site plan and architectural review of a 13-unit detached condominium project on 2.17 acres in the Low Medium (LM)Residential District(4-8 dwelling units per acre)for a site located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street-APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, Minor Exception DRC2013- 00941 and Minor Exception DRC2014-00358. On October 10, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is,required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. D. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2013-00941 -CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES-A request to allow 7-foot high walls along Archibald Avenue for noise attenuation in connection with Design Review DRC2013-00583 for the site plan and design review of a 13-unit detached condominium project on 2.17 acres in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre)for a site located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street-APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. E. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00358-CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES-An request for up to 8-foot high walls in the private areas separating Units 11/12 and Units 10/13 and between the project site and the Mobile Home Park to the west due to a 2 foot grade difference in connection with Design Review DRC2013-00583 for the site plan and design review of a 13-unit detached condominium project on 2.17 acres in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a site located on the west side of PHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 3 Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street-APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. F. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00942 - CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - A request to remove 45 trees in connection with a Design Review(DRC2013-00583)for a site plan and design review of a 13-unit detached condominium project on 2.17 acres in the Low Medium (LM)Residential District(4-8 dwelling units per acre)for a site located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street-APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. V. COMMISSION BUSINEWHISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION G. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES H. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS VI. ADJOURNMENT F=� THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL IMMEDIATELY ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP HELD IN THE RAINS ROOM TO DISCUSS DRC2014-01096. 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee,hereby certify that a true,accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 5,2015,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Rpacm FEBRUARY 11, 2015 C Page 4 INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,533 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. J VicinityMap • Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting FEBRUARY 11 , 2015 2 --- Li I :29 o E A 0 = I r € o CL r j U 1 � t o 1 19th St i Base Line Base Line TChurch J ZI Church Foothill a Foothill N m 1 Arrow E S Arrow � J rsey 8th o -7 —a — c� stn' = stn w C'r 4th , a = _ L 4th 7k Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive A: Approval of Adjourned Meeting Minutes dated January 14, 2015 B: Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated January 28, 2015 Items C-f: DRC2013-00583; DRC2013-00941; DRC2014-00358 & DRC2013-00942 • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKSHOP MINUTES OF ;CHO CUCAMONCA THE PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 14, 2015 7:00 PM* Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center ***RAINS ROOM*** 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 7:37 PM Roll Call ® Chairman Wimberly A Vice Chairman Oaxaca A Munoz X Howdyshell X Fletcher X II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,making loud noises,or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION A. PRE APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-01052 - JEC ENTERPRISES, INC. - The request to subdivide 5(gross)acres into 11 lots in the Low(L)Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan on the east side of East Avenue, south of the 210 freeway, • located at 6563 East Avenue; APN: 022707117. Item A-1 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES � c� JANUARY 14, 2015 oNa► Page 2 Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner, made opening remarks regarding the purpose of the workshop and introduced the project. She noted the challenge of the current orientation of the historic home and reviewed the 4 alternatives outlined in the staff report. In response to Commissioner Howdyshell, it was noted that the historic home is currently occupied by tenants. The applicant added that the historic home is a large two-story house in which the water and electrical service has been upgraded. He noted the home also has a basement which could complicate the suggestion to. move the structure to another lot or to rotate it from its current west facing orientation. He said they make it look like it has access from the East but provide actual access from the proposed interior street. He said the change could be mitigated with softer forms of landscaping. He noted the historic preservationist they consulted wants to preserve the look from East Avenue. in response.to Commissioner Munoz,'the applicant noted that in this scenario, the two adjacent houses would also take access from the proposed interior street(Brownstone). It was noted that some of the cultural setting of the house could be lost with the changes. The applicant said the house has always been situated on its own on this large site, so the development would destroy that some degree anyway. Dan James, Senior Engineer, said that Engineering does not want an access from East Avenue. Commissioner Munoz acknowledged the desire to keep the historic orientation to the west, but asked what they could do to make the structure safe. He asked if they would agree to landscape softly. The applicant suggested they could make the theme walls to look like they fall into the site of the historic home and then they would expand the interior landscaping within the walls of the historic home. He said the walls could be shorter garden walls with wrought iron on top with an access gate in front. He said they plan to preserve the home which will include repairs to the interior walls and a garage will be added. It would then be put up for sale. Commissioner Fletcher said he did not see a problem with leaving the frontage to the historic home open as long as it is of equal quality with the new homes to be constructed. He said it may be beneficial to leave the historic home site open for the . public to see. Commissioner Howdyshell said she liked the idea of keeping the home oriented as it is and using the extended theme Nall idea to showcase it. She said the frontage gate Item A-2 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP iWINUTES RwcHO JANUARY 14, 2015 CUC"ONM Page 3 would give access there if they needed it but the access would be provided to the rear as well. Commissioner Fletcher said he would still like the rear of the adjacent homes to look like the front. Candyce Burnett, Planning Director said staff would like to see the frontage of the historic house stay oriented to East Avenue to keep the context. She said they could `step back" the wall in the rear to add more room for additional screening on the Brownstone side. The applicant noted that the reason for a 6 foot wall was in case the property owner does not care for the back yard- i.e. screening for their neighbors'benefit. Commissioner Munoz summized that the direction looks like Alternative 1 with a theme wall for the majority of the development excluding the historic house and more • landscaping would be added at the front and rear of the historic house. Jeff Bloom, DCM, Economic and Community Development, suggested grove trees for screening. Ms. Nakajima said the site used to be a grove so a grove-like planting would be in the historical context. The applicants asked if it should be similar to what was used to the south of this development. Ms. Burnett responded affirmatively. The applicants asked about the improvements on Fisher Drive. Mr. James confirmed that the corner needs to be redone and East Avenue fully widened. The applicants asked for direction regarding the architectural details, noting that the historic lap siding would be too expensive to replicate. Ms Burnett indicated that staff would work with them. Commissioner Munoz suggested a blend and that a Craftsman style would fit in. • Item A-3 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP iWINUTES __�ccam JANUARY 14, 2015 L�"c"OM& Page 4 IV. ADJOURNMENT 8:20 PM 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee,hereby certify that a true,accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 8,2015,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 0 If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devicest-are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your.position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to, Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." . Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 Item A-4 • PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP Cao JANUARY 14, 2015 Page 5 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please tum off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us • Item A-5 4 • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THEMINUTES INUTFS OF ;CHO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION CUCAMONGA AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 28, 2015 0 7:00 PAA Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER ® Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 PM Roll Call Chairman Wimberly A Vice Chairman Oaxaca X Munoz X Howdyshell X Fletcher X It was noted that Chairman Wimberly was absent and that it is excused Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney,- Rebecca Fuller, Administrative Secretary; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Mike Smith. Associate Planner; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner FIE. II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed ® directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Item B-1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES _RA14ceo JANUARY 28,2015 oUC" N(3A Page 2 Debra Stokes, Diana Kang, James Washington,Augustine Wong and Krystal Behyamein spoke regarding various concerns in the vicinity of 12961 Grape Harvest Drive. They reported that although they are a new community, they are experiencing problems with the tenants from the apartments to the south such as vehicles parked overnight, trash, old cars, loitering, people making out in cars, and leering. They said numerous calls have been made to the police because of perceived safety issues and the inconvenience and to their knowledge, nothing_has been..done_....__.........._ __.._......_....._._.....__... .. ... . Vice Chairman Oaxaca suggested they meet with Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer in the lobby so their complete information could be taken. Candyce Burnett, Planning Director said our Code Enforcement team and the Police would look into this. E EIII. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Approval of regular meeting minutes dated January 14, 2015 Moved by Munoz, seconded by Howdyshell, carried 3-0-1-1 (Oaxaca abstain, Wimberly absent), to adopt the regular meeting minutes of January 14, 2015 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. B. TIME EXTENSION DRC2014-01076 - JASWINDERS AND LAKHBIR KAUR SONDH -A request to extend the expiration date of an approved Conditional Use Permit (DRC2009- 00308)for two years from-February-10�2015 to February 10,-2017;for the design,layout- and ayoutand operation of a proposed automatic car wash at an existing service station and convenience store located in the Community Commercial(CC)Development District of the Terra Vista Community Plan at 11768 Foothill Boulevard;APN: 1090-121-16.The Planning Commission determined that the project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (c) (Small Structures). Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no further environmental review is required as there are no changes to the project. Tabe van der zwaag, Associate Planner presented the staff report and a brief PowerPoint presentation (Copy on file). The applicant was not present. Vice Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, Item B-2 • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 3 closed the public hearing. 'lice Chairman Oaxaca confirmed that nothing had changed since the original project approval. -- -----Moved by Fletcher,- seconded by Munoz,--carried, 4-0-0- V(Wimr belly absent) to adopt Resolution No. 15-01 approving Time Extension DRC2014-01076. C. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00620 - BENCHMARK COMMUNITIES - A request for the architectural and site plan review of 95 single-family homes located within the Low- Residential (L) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan adjacent to Indian Wells Place approximately 1,800 feet north of Day Creek Boulevard -APN: 1087-071-15. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226-2. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 88082915 and No. 98121091 certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001)and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental • Impact Report. Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner presented the staff report and Powerpoint presentation (copy on file). Alex Wong of Benchmark Communities stated they are excited for the new development and thanked staff for their assistance. Vice Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. Commissioner..Munoz.said he is in support, very nice views and great elevations. ---- - - Commissioner Howdyshell stated she is pleased to see single-story homes in conformance with the Development Code and commented on the great courtyard entrance and the nice gate and side entrance of Residence 4. She asked if all 4 residence models will be built. Mr. Wong indicated they would. Commissioner Fletcher noted this is the final phase, and complimented the attractive elevations. He commented that it is unusual to think of a large, two story home described as a bungalow. Vice Chairman Oaxaca stated he is happy overall and echoed prior comments of support. • b9oved by Howdyshell, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-0-1 (Wimberly absent), to adopt Resolution No. 15-02 approving Design Review DRC2014-00620. Item B-3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES � � JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 4 D. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 - TRACY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC - A request to subdivide one existing 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels within the Equestrian _--.. .Overlay of th..e Very.Low(VL).Residential.Zoning.District located.at the northeast comer of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane at 5615 Sapphire Street-APN: 1061-691-04.This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects)of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner,presented the report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted the grading and drainage plans have been adjusted to help address the neighbors'concerns. He said he received an email from a property owner to the south. The homeowner reviewed the revisions made to the plans and still voiced concerns regarding drainage. Mr. Perez confirmed that the proposal meets our guidelines and requirements. Tracy Raszewski stated she is representing the applicant and said she would be happy to answer questions. Commissioner Fletcher confirmed where the easterly lots will drain. He asked if any water will drain directly to Sapphire Street. Mr. Perez said it will drain east and west partially to the v ditch and the remainder directly to the cul de sac. He said he did not believe it would drain directly to Sapphire. Vice Chairman Oaxaca asked if the new design re-directs the water away from the cul de sac. Mr. Perez said he did not believe so because the wall is being removed. Vice Chairman Oaxaca asked if the v ditch is on Mr. Gonzalez'private property. Mr. Perez said the v ditch as well as the equestrian trail is on his private property. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said the v ditch is on his property but there is a legal city held easement for it. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer clarified and said it is a public drainage easement that is privately maintained. Commissioner Munoz said it appears the v ditch is already overflowing today. He asked for explanation. Mr. Perez said he took photos on the property today and placed them an the overhead (copies on file). He said the drainage,problem is partially due to a lack of maintenance: the Item B-4 • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AR AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES C JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 5 grate is filled with dirt and debris that is causing backup and flooding. Commissioner Howdyshell asked if it is not properly cleared. "Ar. Perez said that is correct. Vice Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Rodrigo de la Cruz. 8369 Brittany Lane stated he was one of first owners in the tract to the south of the proposed development and it has historical drainage problems. He said their street and property will still have more water and that the current opening to the inlet is not enough even for the current conditions. He said he works every day and has not had time to look at the plans. He said he wants a study to be done to see how much water is there. He said with the construction of 6 or 7 more houses and when the existing retaining wall is removed, there will be even more water flowing to his property. • Robert Gonzalez, 8388 Brittany Lane said the two v ditches are not attached to one another— there is a break between the two and the grate is clogged. He said the home to the south of the horse trail on Jennet is totally unprotected from water flows. He said the retaining wall does not allow for proper drainage. He said the existing inlet needs to be bigger and the outlet is too small as well. He asked if he allows someone to tap into his v ditch is he liable? He said he does not give permission for the City or the developer to tap into his v ditch. Michael Mulgrew, 5650 Sapphire Street, said he is a civil engineer. He said the previous studies did not provide a calculation that shows these flows will be absorbed. He said there is only one inlet on Brittany and it is only 5 feet wide and it wants to be 11 feet wide to handle the-flows He-said.he believes the storm drain line-is adequate but the question-is how to get the runoff water there. He said the downstream folks have the responsibility to keep the drain clear. He said the developer should get the water out of the v ditch and streets and get it into more inlets on the cul de sac. He said there is a need to protect the existing properties. Commissioner Fletcher asked how he did his calculation. &1r. Mulgrew said he did an orifice calculation for the curb opening on Brittany Lane. He said he has not analyzed the v ditches. AW. Flower said it would be appropriate to allow the applicant to respond. 'As Raszewski stated that her engineer is present to answer questions and that he has • agreed to continue to work with the City and has already accepted additional conditions on the project related to drainage. Item B-5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES C � JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 6 Rob Otte of Otte-Berkeley Group, Civil Engineers said he reviewed the revised plans with Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, and they agreed that with the added condition they were acceptable. He pointed out that an additional condition has been added(B-28) which states "Provide calculations and install additional drainage inlet facilities as determined by the City Engineer. at.the..south.end.of.Brittany.Lane.-". He said-the development willcutoff some-of---- the drainage and reduces the impacts to the v ditch. He said he appreciates the assistance received from Dominic Perez, Dan James and Mathew Addington. Vice Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing. Commissioner Fletcher asked whose responsibility is it to clean out v ditches and to make sure they are not clogged up after a heavy rain. Mr. Flower deferred to Mr. James. Mr. James responded that the City is not responsible for the maintenance of the ditch or trail. He said the drainage on their property and easement on their subdivision is privately maintained. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said that it has to be privately maintained. He said this is part of Land Use Law that private property owners must accept some water coming from upstream. He said as long as the property owners upstream are not creating an unreasonable burden, that is their responsibility. He said there is existing drainage already built on the project site and if it is not adequate they can build a bigger one. He said it appears the project site has been re-engineered to handle more water flow. Commissioner Munoz asked for clarification. __._........... ...._... . ............. ...... Mr. James said this situation is not unusual and that there is a Standard Condition for preparing a drainage study. He added that sometimes when we get into plan check/technical review more catch basins are deemed necessary and the developer is required to install them. (see added condition B-28). He said the City Engineer has the authority to determine this. He said there are different options that can be considered, but it wont be known as to what is needed until we get to that technical review. Mr. Flower noted that this is a Tentative Map and that if Engineering is not satisfied with the drainage, then the City will withhold the Final map until it is. Commissioner Howdyshell confirmed that this issue will be carefully looked at as the project moves through the process. Mr. James said yes it would. Item B-6 - i HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CRAwcw JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 7 Vice Chairman Oaxaca re-opened the public hearing. AAr. Mulgrew said the overall water developed on that property is not being reduced and the quantity has to be dealt with. He said the current inlet is in a sump position and there has been flooding in the past. . Ms. Raszewskie said the water is already on the site and that the processing of a map will not increase that. She noted that she agreed to the conditions to mitigate the problems that exist and they are looking at mitigations that decrease the impact. Mr. Gonazalez said the development will increase permeable surfaces such as concrete and rooftops and therefore there will be less dirt resulting in less absorption, therefore there will be more water to runoff the site. Mr. Otte said with respect to impervious area, that the modeling software they used to calculate the drainage needs has taken this into consideration. He said the reduction of • impervious area is built in and takes that into account and that Condition B-28 does address the concern. Mr. Gonzalez said he does not believe they have taken the possibility of a 50-100 year storm into account. '✓ice Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing at 8:10 p.m. Commissioner Munoz said he realizes the concern is a little thorny. He expressed appreciation to staff for their explanation of Condition B-28. Commissioner Howdyshell said she feels the same and that the condition-noted gives- security that a watchful eye will be on this. Commissioner Fletcher said he heard the concerns throughout the prior review about drainage. He said staff and applicants have worked over it and attempted to mitigate this and that this is not the end of the process. He said the applicants will have to prove this is addressed before the project is done. Vice Chairman Oaxaca agreed and it appears staff created a process to work through it to get a satisfactory result. He urged staff to.keep abreast with the conditions to see they are being addressed. He noted amended conditions for the project have been placed before the Commissioners. • Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Howdyshell, carried 4-0-0-1 (Wimberly absent), to adopt Resolution Plo. 1.5-03 as amended with the revised set of conditions placed before the Commission approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961. Item B-7 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Ho JANUARY 28, 2015 LTuc�ox`A Page 8 E. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00207-PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS EAST AVE LLC-A request to construct 6 single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved 6-lot subdivision on 2.99 acres in the Low(L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located-on the west side of East Avenues approximately 500,feet south-of the Victoria Avenue. Related file:Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578;APN: 022712133. On August 23, 2006, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Jim Banks confirmed that he is speaking on behalf of the developer and has a /< interest in the project although he was originally in opposition of the project when it was brought to the Commission in 2006. Vice Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and hearing and seeing no comment, closed the public hearing. Commissioner Howdyshell remarked that she is pleased to see single-story homes as they are in demand. Commissioner Munoz echoed the comment. Commissioner-Fletcher said it is niceproduct, and a good addition to-the City's housing-- stock. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Howdyshell, .carried 4-0-0-1 (Wimberly absent), to adopt Resolution No. 15-04 approving Design Review DRC2014-00207. F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2014-00915-AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC(AMC)- A request to establish alcoholic beverage sales(Type 47-On-Sale General for Bona Fide Public Eating Place) in conjunction with the existing Victoria Gardens AMC 12 Movie Theater, in the Mixed Use (MU) District of the Victoria Planned Community, located at 12600 North Mainstreet; APN: 109053105. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and the PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Item B-8 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION p1tMCHO AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 28, 2015 C Page 9 Victor de La Cruz, representing AMC said they now have 100 MacGuffins locations and they never had any alcohol related issues. Commissioner Howdyshell asked for clarification regarding the number of drinks allowed per customer on the staff report on Page F-5, as two per visit to the bar, but the conditions reflect only one. Yr. Grahn stated the ABC regulation is a maximum of 2, but our condition (along with AMC) is more restrictive. Commissioner Fletcher confirmed that the bar is in the interior of the theater and that patrons must get a ticket first. Mr. Grahn indicated that is correct. Commissioner Munoz confirmed that AMC now is permitted to operate 100 such locations • but only 3 are close by with any experience. He asked for clarification regarding their service policy. Mr. De la Cruz said they have a good relationship with the police; there is a zero tolerance policy and all staff receives TiPS training. He said if a patron is already intoxicated, they will not be admitted. Vice Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing none, closed the public hearing. ,Mr. de la Cruz said some cities have done away with their wrist band requirement. He said they would like..to return. with the.request.to.have no-wrist bands_ . Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said they can apply for a modification of their CUP later and have another public hearing or just ask for a 6-month review-either way, they would need a modification hearing. Commissioner Munoz stated for the record that although he is impressed with their conditions he does not like this proposal- it's not good for P,ancho. Hs said he frequents that theater and it already has other issues during the showing of a movie such as telephones. crying babies, and unruly kids. He said nobody does a thing about it and he did not believe they would handle this any different. He said he would support it anyway. Commissioner Howdyshell said she would enjoy a glass wine at the movies just like .she would enjoy that at home. She said there i.s a theater in Pasadena that serves dinner and • drinks. She said she welcomes the applicant to come back and give a report as to how it is going. .She said it is a new idea and she looks forward to it. Item B-9 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES HO JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 10 Commissioner Fletcher said it is new to serve alcohol in a theater but no longer unusual to get wine or a drink at a live play-they often have a bar set up for the theater patrons. He said there are conditions in place and staff received police input. He said the unique serving glasses and wrist bands are a good idea. He said that if drinks are priced like the food, kids won't be buying much alcohol. Vice Chairman Oaxaca said this is the natural evolution of movie theaters; there is a different competition with the technology available at home. He said he is comfortable with the business model and the applicant can come back at a later time for the request to no longer require wrist bands. Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-0-1 (Wimberly absent), to adopt Resolution No. 15-05 approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2014-00915. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18976 — CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES — A request to subdivide 3.2 acres of land in order to develop 31 detached residential condominiums for a site located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street in the Medium (M) Development District - APN: 0207-262-01, 02 and 03. Related case: DRC2014-00570. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00570 — CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES—Site plan and architectural review of a 31-unit multi-family project on 3.2 acres of.land located on the east side of Madrone Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street in the Medium (M)Development District-APN: 0207-262-01, 02 and 03: Related case: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18976.- Staff has prepared a Mitigated- Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. Tabe van der Zwaag presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Patrick Diaz stated he represents the applicants and said he appreciates staff for their assistance through the process. Commissioner Howdyshell said she is impressed they are installing tankless water heaters. Mr. Diaz said they are also installing added insulation, low flow toilets etc for energy and water conservation. Vice Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Marjorie Prescott stated her parents have a legal non-conforming property to the south of the project site for which they have been assessed to pay KB Home for drainage facilities Itpm R-10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES C� JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 11 8133.000. She wanted to be sure they are not reassessed for this development as well. She felt KB Homes was harassing her parents and are trying to make them leave because they refused to sell the property to them. She said the adjoining property owners have called in many complaints. She said KB has made it impossible for them to develop their property. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer said KB Homes had to install local storm drain facilities and that facility benefits her parent's property as well. He said that requirement will still apply with this new development and they will have to comply. He said whatever developer goes in on that property will be required to make that contribution. Vice Chairman Oaxaca confirmed that the assessment will be triggered for this applicant when this development goes in. He said KB's improvements triggered a benefit to her parents,property. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney invited the applicant to respond. Kevin Kent Crestwood Communities said he understands that they have that same condition. Vice Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing. Commissioner Munoz asked for an explanation regarding the owls. Mr. van der Zwaag noted that there is an added condition and an amended mitigation with respect to migratory birds and Burrowing Owls. He briefly explained the amended condition requiring an owl survey prior to grading and the amended mitigation regarding a breeding bird.survey._.. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher. carried 4-0-0-1 (Wimberly absent), to adopt Resolution Plos 15-06 and 15-07 approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT 18976 and Design Review DRC2014-00570 with the added condition and amended mitigation. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18966—MARC HOMES, LLC-A proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of 1.89 acre into eight(8)lots within the Low Medium (LM)Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way, located at 13025 Base Line Road - APN: 1100-011-02. Related files: Development Review DRC2014-00645 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00645 - MARC HOMES, LLC - A proposal to construct eight (8) single-family residences in- conjunction with a subdivision of a vacant parcel of 1.89 acre into eight (8) lots within the Item 8-11 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES O JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 12 Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way, located at 13025 Base Line.Road - APN: 1100-011-02. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. K. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00581 —MARC HOMES, LLC—A request to remove trees in conjunction with the subdivision of a vacant parcel of 1.89 acres into eight(8) lots and construction of eight(8)single-family residences in the Low.Medium (LM)Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan,at the south side of Base Line Road between Shelby Place and Emmett Way, located at 13025 Base Line Road; APN: 11.00-011-02. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18966 and Development Review DRC2014-00645. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Mike Smith, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted that Page 84 had an error: the wood sheeting should be .5 inch thick. He confirmed the corrected copy was published. Michael Lutz representing Marc Homes thanked staff for their invaluable assistance. Vice Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Hearing and seeing no comment, closed the public hearing. Commissioner Howdyshell said she is pleased to see this done as this piece has been bare land for long time. Commissioner Fletcher said the product looks nice. He complimented staff and the applicant for their work and said the homes are attractive and a good addition to the housing stock. Vice Chairman Oaxaca thanked the applicants and staff and said the applicants addressed the issues that staff had. Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-0-1 (Wimberly absent), to adopt Resolution Nos 15-08. 15-09 and 15-10 approving Tentative Tract Map SUSTT18966, Development Review DRC2014-00645 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00581. It was noted that the noise mitigation related to the thickness of wood sheeting for roofing has been corrected to read% inch. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014- 00567—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS-A proposal to amend the Development Code to permit the construction of buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet on select parcels located within the Industrial Park (IP) District - APN: 0210-371-02. Related files: Development Review DRC2014-00566 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845. Staff Item B-12 ® HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES &Acso JANUARY 28, 2015 mmm UC"ONG& Page 13 has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00566 — TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS-A proposal to construct an industrial building of about 116,480 square feet on a parcel of about 249,000 square feet(5.72 acres)within the Industrial Park (IP) District, located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue - APN: 0210-371-02. Related files: Development Code Amendment DRC2014- 00567 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00845. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. N. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2014-00845—TURNER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS— A request to remove trees in conjunction with the construction of an industrial building of about 116,480 square feet on a parcel of about 249,000 square feet(5.72 acres)within the Industrial Park (IP) District, located at 10220 4th Street about 1,600 feet west of Haven Avenue - APN: 0210-371-02. Related files: Development Code Amendment DRC2014- 00567 and Development Review DRC2014-00566. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Mike Smith, Associate Planner gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation(copy on file). He noted that the landscape plan is in need of correction as the area on the east side of the project site although shown as decomposed granite will have to be fully landscaped in conformance with the Development Code. He said new conditions have been added for the burrowing owl and migratory birds as provided to the Commission on the dais. He said he also received a letter from the Office of Historic Preservation that included a request for an archaeological resource survey. He noted that the current mitigations already address the concerns regarding possible cultural impacts. He also noted correspondence from San Bernardino-County Public Works re: percolated: He said the WQMP-alreadyaddresses- their concern. He noted their concern about stormwater runoff. He said staff has responded and noted that the amendment only affects this specific type of building. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer said a Development Code change will not increase stormwater runoff. Jason Korengold of Turner Real Estated offered many thanks to ivir. Smith, Mr. James and Mr. Addington for their assistance. Commissioner Fletcher asked what building size is currently permitted in the industrial Park District. tvfr. Smith said it could be up to 60% FAR but the current code does not allow a logistics • building of that size to be permitted. Item B-13 91 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MiNUTES CRAMHO JANUARY 28, 2015 UGAM G& Page 14 Commissioner Fletcher confirmed that we already allow the use, but only a smaller sized building. Vice Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing none, closed the public hearing. Commissioner Munoz said he supports the amendment and said the project is an improvement; he likes the elevations. He thanked staff for their work on this. Commissioner Howdyshell concurred and also complimented staff and the applicant. Commissioner Fletcher said it is a nice building and development. Vice Chairman Oaxaca agreed this amendment is part of the natural progression, .of development because these companies want a larger building and we found a solution that provides flexibility. Moved-by Fletcher, seconded by Howdyshell, carried, 4-0-0-1 (Wimberly absent) to adopt Resolution Nos 15-11, 15-:12 and 15-13 recommending approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00567 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action, and approving Development Review DRC2014-00566 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014- 00845 with the amended conditions of approval. V. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HIS'T'ORIC PRESERVATION AND -------- — PLANNINGGCOMMISSION----- O. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES None P. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS Commissioner Howdyshell announced that she toured the historic gas station, viewed the new yellow paint color and commented on the nice quality work that has gone into the renovation. She said the progress is amazing. Commissioner Fletcher asked for more comment regarding the issue of burrowing owls. Mike Smith, Associate Planner said there is more scrutiny of projects with respect to the CDFW; they are looking for more precise analysis. He said the main thrust of the comments centers on the requirement that if owls are found, we are to avoid construction or any activity that would disrupt their nests or young. Item B-14 PHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES o JANUARY 28, 2015 Page 15 VI. ADJOURNMENT 9:35 PM 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee,hereby certify that a true,accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 22,2015,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. IF-- If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to • ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item,-To address the Planning Commission;- please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. • AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Item B-15 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Ho JANUARY 28, 2015 ,� �`� Page 16 Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Item B-16 e t STAFF REPORT PLANNINGDEPARTMENr f Date: February 11, 2015 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Subject: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00583 - Creative Design Associates - Site plan and architectural review of a 13 unit detached condominium project on 2.17 acres in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a site located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, Minor Exception DRC2013- 00941 and Minor Exception DRC2014-00358. On October 10, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2013-00941 - Creative Design Associates - A request to allow 7 foot high walls along Archibald Avenue for noise attenuation in connection with Design • Review DRC2013-00583 for the site plan and design review of a 13 unit detached condominium project on 2.17 acres in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a site located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street -APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. Related Files: Design Review DRC2013- 00583, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942. On October 10, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00358 - Creative Design Associates - A request for up to 8 foot high walls in the private areas separating Units 11/12 and Units 10/13 and between the project site and the Mobile Home Park to the west due to a two foot grade difference in connection with Design Review DRC2013-00583 for the site plan and design review of a 13 unit detached condominium project on 2.17 acres in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a site located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street-APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. Related Files: Design Review DRC2013-00583, Minor Exception DRC2014-00941 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013- 00942. On October 10, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The .California Environmental, Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Item C—F1 A f y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00583, DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942&DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 2 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00942 - Creative Design Associates - A request to remove 45 trees in connection with a Design Review (DRC2013-00583) for a site plan and design review of a 13 unit detached condominium project on 2.17 acres in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a site located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. Related Files: Design Review DRC2013-00583, Minor Exception DRC2014-00941 and Minor Exception DRC2014-00358. On October 10, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2013-00583, Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 though the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 6 dwelling units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use.and Zoning: North - Mobile Home Park- Low Medium (LM) Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Residential—Medium (M) Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Multi-Family Residential - Medium (M) Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Mobile Home Park- Low Medium (LM) Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) - -- — North - Low Residential (2-4) dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) D. Proiect Background: The project was previously approved on October 10, 2007, however, the applicant did not request a Time Extension or pull permits within 5 years of approval. As such, the Design Review entitlement expired on October 10, 2012. The related Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17444) has not expired because of multiple extensions approved by the State Legislature. The original project approval also included a Development District Amendment Item C—F2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00583, DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942 & DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 3 (DRC2005-00523), which was reviewed and approved by the City Council on November 11, 2007, changing the Development District Map from Medium (M) Residential to Low Medium (LM) Residential to bring the site into conformance with the General Plan. The basic layout and building footprints of the proposed project are similar to the originally approved project. The applicant has reversed the floor plans on a number of units, the pad elevations have been slightly adjusted to comply with current Building Code and WQMP requirements, and the architectural elevations have been updated to reflect current design criteria. E. Site Characteristics: The 2.17 acre site slopes gently to the southeast and contains 45 trees of various species and the remnants of a stone-lined drainage channel. A Phase II Cultural Resource Significance Assessment (Michael Brandman Associates; October 31, 2006) submitted for the original project concluded that the project site is not considered eligible for listing as an historic resource or landmark status at either the local or State levels. The adjacent mobile home park has an open storm drain which currently surface drains across the site and enters the public storm drain system at the southern boundary of the site, which will be undergrounded as part of the project. The approved Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17444) includes conditions of approval requiring a reciprocal access easement with the mobile home park that borders the project site to the north • and west and for the construction of a new traffic light at Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street. The new signalized intersection necessitates relocating the main entrance to the mobile home park and making a number of other site changes to their parking lot. The changes include landscaping the existing entrance to the mobile park which is being eliminated, relocating parking spaces (total number will not change), relocating a shuffle board court and installing a landscaped traffic island to prevent traffic conflicts between the project site and the mobile home park. The applicant and the property owner of the mobile home park have entered into a legal agreement outlining the on-site improvements to be made to the mobile home park. The proposed improvements are also shown on the attached plans (Exhibit "A") and the project will not be approved for occupancy prior to completion of all the improvements shown on the plans. ANALYSIS: A. GENERAL: The applicant proposes to construct 13 detached condominiums on 2.17 acres of vacant land. The proposed density is 6 dwelling units per acre, which is in the middle of the Low-Medium Residential range of 4-8 dwelling units per acre. The project is designed to conform to the development standards outlined in the Optional Development Standards of the Development Code for the Low-Medium Residential District. The units have a minimum 15-foot side-to-side setback and exceed the required 30 foot front-to-front setback. The project provides 46 percent of private and common open space area in excess of the minimum 45 percent open space requirement. The project will be gated and includes sidewalks that provide connections to the common open space areas and to the front entrance Item C—F3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00583, DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942& DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 4 and public sidewalk along Archibald Avenue. The project also includes a secondary emergency vehicle access along Archibald Avenue with a manual sliding gate. The common open space amenities include two covered picnic tables with BBQ units, a tot lot and two open play areas. Private open space is included along the sides (minimum 5 and 10 feet) and rear of each unit (minimum 15 feet). An attached two-car garage is provided with each unit in addition to 11 guest parking spaces, 6 parking spaces over the minimum requirement. The garages and front doors are accessed from the private street that runs through the project. The project includes 3 plans — 2, two-story models and 1, one-story model. The two-story models will each have two elevation types (Spanish and cottage) and range in size from 1,697 to 2,145 square feet. The single-story model will have one elevation type (Spanish) and is 1,792 square feet. B. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2013-00941: The project includes an application for a Minor Exception to construct a 7-foot high perimeter wall along Archibald Avenue and wrapping around Unit 9. The project site is within an area with noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9. An acoustical analysis was completed for the originally approved project and concluded that with a 7-foot high perimeter wall along Archibald Avenue and wrapping around Unit 9, the project would comply with the City's residential noise standards. The wall is also a required mitigation measure included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the related tentative tract map. The wall will be constructed of split-face bock with stone veneer columns. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Fact: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. Finding: The proposed increase in wall height along the eastern project boundary is necessary to comply with the General Plan Goal PS-13 to minimize the impacts of excessive noise levels and General Plan Policy PS-13-3 to consider the use of noise barriers or walls to reduce noise levels generated by ground transportation. The increased wall height will reduce the onsite noise levels to be in compliance with City regulations. Fact: The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Finding: The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses in that the project site is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, which permits the development of single and multi-family residences. Additionally, there is residential development to the north, south and west of the project site and to the east across Archibald Avenue. Noise attenuation walls over the permitted height limit occur throughout the City along major streets. Item C—F4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • DRC2013-00583, DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942 & DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 5 Fact: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Finding: The project is located along a major street which increases the onsite noise levels in excess of City regulations. The increased wall height will permit the project to comply with City noise attenuation requirements and provide a pleasing street scene. The proposed wall will be constructed of decorative block and the area between the wall and the public right-of-way will be landscaped to soften the appearance of the wall. Fact: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. Finding: It is common practice to approve Minor Exceptions for wall height in order to mitigate excessive noise levels for projects adjacent to major streets. The increased wall height will not negatively impact properties in the vicinity as the wall will be required to have a decorative finish and landscaping which will soften the appearance of the extra wall height. ® C. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00358: The project also includes an application for up to 8-foot high walls in the private yard areas separating Units 11/12 and Units 10/13 and between the project site and the Mobile Home Park to the west. The extra wall height is necessary because of up to 2-foot grade difference at the subject locations. The walls will be constructed of tan block and will have a split-face finish where it is not located within a private open space area. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Fact: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. Finding: The proposed increase in wall height due to a grade difference between adjacent private yard areas and neighboring projects is consistent with the residential nature of the Development District in which the site is located. The additional wall height will provide privacy and security between the adjacent yard areas and neighboring project sites. Fact: The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Finding: The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses in that the project site is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, which permits the development of single and multi-family residences. Additionally, there is residential development to the north, south and west of the project site and to the east across Archibald Avenue. Wall heights over 6 feet are common where there is a grade difference between adjacent yard areas and neighboring project sites. • Item C—F5 . f PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00583, DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942& DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 6 Fact: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Finding: There is an approximately 2-foot grade difference between adjacent private yards area and project sites. The additional wall height will allow residents to secure their private yard areas with a minimum 6-foot high wall. Fact: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. Finding: It is common practice to approve Minor Exceptions for wall height within the residential districts when there is a grade difference between adjacent yard areas and project sites. The additional wall height will only be visible to the residents living directly adjacent to the walls and will not negatively impact other property owners in the area. D. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00942: The applicant has submitted a request to remove 45 trees in order to accommodate the development of the site. An Arborist Report was prepared on May 17, 2005, which surveyed the site and found a total of 45 trees that qualify as Heritage Trees under the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. Of these trees, all but 6 trees have been recommended for removal due to their poor condition. The required grading and site layout prevent preserving the 6 healthy trees. The Development Code requires that new developments plant 40 trees per acre of which 90-percent must be 15-gallon size trees and 10-percent must be 24-inch box size trees. The Landscape Plan includes 92 new trees, 5 trees in excess of the minimum requirement, of which 43 percent will be 24-inch box size trees. E. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE: The project was reviewed and approved as presented by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca and Granger) on June 3, 2014. F. GRADING AND TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEES: The project was reviewed and approved as presented by the Grading and Technical Review Committees on June 3, 2014 -- - - G.-NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: The-applicant held a neighborhood meeting on June 11, 2014 to discuss the proposed project. Property owners within 660 feet of the project site were notified of the meeting and approximately 30 residents were in attendance. The following issues were raised at the meeting: Traffic flow between the mobile home park and the relocated traffic light. • Drainage issues between the mobile home park and the proposed development. Double wall issues between the mobile home park and the proposed development. The applicant:explained to the residents that they will work with the owner of the mobile home park to resolve any issues that arise due to the relocated traffic light. The project engineer - -- Item C-1`6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • DRC2013-00583, DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942& DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 7 explained that all offsite drainage flows will be collected and directed to a new underground drainage facility which will connect to the existing storm drain on Archibald Avenue. The applicant explained that where ever double walls exist, the existing wall will be removed. Since the neighborhood meeting, the,applicant and the owner of the mobile home park have negotiated changes to the flow of traffic on the mobile home site and updated plans have been submitted to the City. The changes include adding a traffic control island directly adjacent to the entrance to the new project, which separates the traffic exiting each project. The changes were coordinated with the Engineering, Traffic and Building Departments and each of these departments have approved the new design. With these changes, all issues raised at the neighborhood meeting have been resolved. H. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff required the applicant to post a large 4-foot by 8- foot Notice of Filing sign on the property, which was also used to post the City's public hearing notice. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative • Declaration .on October 10, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated original approval and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The general layout and number of units have not changed from the original environmental determination. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not .have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. The project layout, design and associated environmental impacts have not changed from the original environmental determination and therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Development Review DRC2013-00583, Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942. A copy of the approved Mitigated Monitoring Program and Mitigation Monitoring Checklist for Tentative Map SUBTT17444 are attached (Exhibit "C"). • Item C—F7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00583, DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942 &DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 ` Page 8 Respectfully sub ed, Candyce Burnett Planning Director CB:TV/Is Attachments: Exhibit A- - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated June 3, 2014 Exhibit C - Mitigated Monitoring Program & Mitigation Monitoring Checklist for Tentative Map SUBTT17444 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2013-00583 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2013-00941 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 __ Item C-1`8 m MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES C D/ 6910, 6946 ARCHIBALD AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 Q CREATIVE DI ASSOCIAT ueilu,Aw Yynfy APNO 202-13181;202-131.82;202-131-27 (REFERENCE FILE M DRC 20055-00250 ) (NEW FILE 9 ORc 2013-00583 ) + 1 .1 — — IEOErAI -�:•M•- `J 4y9a9pdy.•Op.W '�-- —d•1 _�1 ACACIA SNOL)Alai IIGrSMG E� IaATHAYEi 110USIR —J iRNOI IIO6[S r <cr r ® 1'Ao[L�A9u Mountain Vie SIN FAM LY DENC D 1-N 3�001RAVAR Estates •••♦ , _.,a._..... e e flo-foor TIADAa • • • �.1I,�'�f'r./.• 11'1011{, 111IE'�II'I.♦. +r'hI{Lr ; •♦•••••• • ••Y'L..J. •U• i..+ ..F�a :•.....•. Y = s NfN1aE . . . . . -... I . D<—y 111.1 • •,•••r-{• + • • •• "" i♦•j < PROJECT OESCRIPrION .•II'LIIF • + • ♦ • • RUNS IVE I•,. , • F 13 OMT DETACHED COHppeAWlNe VROECI DI•2.17 LfJn LOT. • • ♦ a • , • • • • •♦• •♦ • ♦ . ♦ ! �i�ij NNOR SR DELE—ENT PITH THE NO•LE,NNE LOT ON THE NORTH ♦ • ♦ ♦ • ♦ , ENR ♦ • 1 0:.+_.I�/,�-• �� SHEETINOEX 9} ;• RESOURCES jl q ••.'•4.�1H11fOF E E E ITT 'R • •VICTORIA BTpElT •�: • 1 er awy,wlraaw•1:aalw ...,.. ♦ 1 _ • , b ••.�•Ya'L\••.1- :.C'r ...i VICTO T_ CONDOS ♦SIERRA VISTA DRIVE• ... , •nm CK UI pOU =Z W n V . . . . . . O.'.•.•.♦.• . .•.•. �i.F; LVE • O .•.'. . . + i NUNTINOTO SOU TN GLEN DRIVE 2 9 > •� < " rj ' Y �. ' „q unlp,AllN LJ rd 51PMU6t:E FAM LY fl IDE!CLf �;_I o L�--� ` �� •w< �I,Nr•� ❑ D it , - -_ CONDOS-, D Sit•Ulilitafion r Wan f'�`l ❑ 1E-�I -IT t PROJECT TEAM u J 1 LA JOLLA DRIVE TTT'JJ! L0 wNr••w/l00) 1�}��■MOu IprN� J T (AA�•.U 9001) �N:"9DC9f9c4 TT!) ` ❑Erl ` \ "� AL f�-91Y EIOT(ol Te0) T[L:e26 fIE-eI99 IO.ssxFw LT CONI 1=t9csn (mai. meMutti.-1•cIv.JWc.can r<'N,q C01TLCt:Rep:two CONRCi: ,Im l'u n UIEll Ta1E—.111c. .11[ST9,T•9 2a�1'1•at[A 91!eO9"• b291]I,D2 ELL I-gee-ee0-9.12 -' " I!I I I I� 1[l:02f 9T)el Dl I[l'909-91-ter) (mN: N-a<fo-e<mn Empr.R0.2D02Rpn Oc•m Q:eww• . G CWTLC. ErN G- [OHTACI: 9•Mn p:m J--II ci9O[IDR MEP cam e23)E .7 BMDBT[hRR05a�Yd:LSS�LRS NC mow. ..—A(;• �)D fAulM,CL 919D6 IAL. 26-O3-e)•1 )AL Eia-N2-If)1 1[l 626-511-•DDO TR'e1e-e•2-1)ee l=I CAMDEN STREET D d11 u'o+ ►p:m<m, [m.e pok<U•,n•npHaa an ®� COrIACT:R•n Lm I:DII�ICI Yy fepm \` EF ATI •�---. wl \ \ I / y� / Dr..••r-. SITE UTILIZATION PLAN S-101 KEYNOTES CODE SUMMARY 1 -u- . I -- ---L '.1- CD/A % CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES SITE NOTES L .—v I L —T kI A T Mountain via. jjjillT LAIR Estates P— ENR Ml 1 HE"! WNW— RESOURCES,LLC IR011H.ILD:11'1:. L -—-—-—--- -— --_----------------- z 2 ----------------------------------I imum mm- 7 o CO u 0 +; + m In 10 F: C4 0 1�u X A 4 • z jr- PMjwtD.W sit.Plain nr I, + --------------- + + + • + DEFFERED SUBMITTALS + + + + + + \l/II. + + + + + 4 + + + + + + + I . + 4 + + + 4 + + + + . . I + + + + . . . . . . . + + . . . + . . . . . . . . . .. SITE PLAN N4) + + + + 4 + + 4 + + • • • - KEYNOTES �/ ❑1 PxOPExh RNC �s YEOtW SWXD-UIF L41xOl rLL MPOSED INE Mo11Wl 2 ort-rxwDaxr.l Yq artx CREATIVE 01 r1nNY E VWROL(BY DMIOfIR) Iu[CK K OR r a s qr Dnu FI a fun cons(IrP.I ASSOCIAI �] POBUC ro[Y lPK( 11 snx Orr hP.) ®(SE PIIOPO![0 RIMY DnrN. ju[ws-la;rax uer rxc 1 � 1 ISE[cMt r41 D[1w51 i.onurer Yf INDSfMC fox rq[MO) '�L1O Ij [rYIc- j 4cO K wwa MrxUI O PNMai[OPfN SPKi Iltc CM rdi YDx[w0) (u[as-Ia.rw Ku Wlc I (u[wosWP[rox anus) 0Y[GI(DEWS AND 110xE [D) IJ KI 0 Wr le[MKr NEY CIx19(ul cit) CwP•Maw•wwru 5 101 l01(45Kar ee rPM1OHD[n Oar[x) P[n tlh 510 PITH.W.103 O 4C 1.(!(C KP IM 0[74[5) aia Q CMB(Y CML) IliNa NOGG xrU 10 R[rw1 ja nfYpYEO PYNPW ❑7 KU59B[MWaga IhPly v a 1, Il[sI[CM Ot!fox Onrl) 1�[r6iMa IOC Mo1 (ul 4-10y rr6MG PHROO 1 xsulE Ola. Mountain Via (lE[/5- r41 m.) 17 WI(-.Yq OPIx �DUIOWN BIMJL!NiN w.x[51 xWr-rNE W E ESEatw (5410 WIC-fm KD Pl CONim) .' .. - .. i 1 e .. ... . I 1 i 1 ; I _^ E NR ESO ;.. ... URCES i. R ........................................................... ... .._................... ._.................................................... ....... . i Aftf.'N/B.t/.0 .al'I_'. ---------- z`.- 0e O I r z 1 _ ZZ .:: I _ i+S dS W i ......._.... r .r. EXMTING f _................ r _ /�,� a , YO&p-- L J , i.. ........ ....._ .. a— - Y r ._. •� ___ 4.; Neighbor Mobl I , ......... PPark Site Plan 11 1 . . .. ......:+ .a.+...... a ' ,- ............................. + .. + + + + + + +........... ...... t + +T + + + t + .. m�.xts 0 ...T...T.. T +.....+......+ .+......+.. .+... + + + + + + ®tee + + + + + + + + + . + .....i. . +I + + T ...,... T. .i1 +.. + .+.. .+.. + + + ' + t +_�_.+ + F+ + + + i +......+._. ..+.. +..__t._....+.! .. ;+ •, +1............... 1 � - t N AS-902. KEYNOTES �/ CD www..DE pp ,. w,n-war p ':ryyq� CREATI VC DI O�.zwtw,[tfxlq in uIX�iMq �l�Pi:rti ml(tvV 1®t[ tw lml ASSDCIAI ' O Ista uirw�m�•ius[idol �a[wa Im.l ®Im us�si rwP T,�is)� ls¢was rw wa roa) 0 is¢�wewsrn rw¢,uy - ❑lui iwosw �'o) Q� 2©Nn wm Im wy trw.Ya.y.r QS ,01 tm lu9a:rvwo�wYu` Eu n nm[U O 4c w��m mrL Q H,prtu run 6¢[XU I>;'Fa°¢�'�.E, EsWt ain vm Isom�Mlcc«mrr tw�xyl ESafBi EL ENR RESOURCES _ +kctus.u.rt a,t. 0 Eo - � o0 0. 3 — _ y E �`{r '� 1MBIIE M]YE uyra t I 1 n~1 s. a. 3 r•vv X.r i I 1 1 s a s r` + _ ___ _ * -# + 1 { + + +.. i + 41 I+ + + + + { + 4 + —+ -1i * *1 ( »i AS-102. aT' CD/ CREATIVE 0 • ASSOCIA* Amlftow bitoft D. Mountain Vio Estates 1.4 ENR RESOURCE! ..................... 4RIC111B4LD All. ----------- ------------------------------------------------------- 0 --------------------------------------------------- 005 Z 0,'0 ZrF, Z La ............ ................. . ................ ............. .............. rl MT ..: ........ —------------- r.m.of np .1 nt A UNIT T \ IFFY LW n .i MAU'; EKISTIKO MOBILE HOME 0. 1 Fhv Ace"s P PARK Ile. -T--r UNR L.PE I I ....................... FIRE LANE NOTE: 1. C.Al AIO RANCHBl0UCAM0N�FWMPMTWHT. P.... ft-, T. AE�MYTCNBAUSTGBE �UNMTRXTEVI�TKINATOR� r. nPEAI T UNn PE I'M C.! TF"To MUW WI. RNW.RAON WW& T== lh we 4. THE W"DiUMI GlUkElE OF THE DFW4M SURFALT, 3G1.NOT EXCEED 12 MR T I 151,�ED Ylilltl('��ABUVBCIT FM FIRE of ta¢ L14W IDpr PRGYl)El)-VfFlIlCaQLFARAI*X OPENTOliKY G. TKF 1.1141 Gft=VEHrtE WEIGW.WFIIFY V47H NOTA !ART FIRE ACCESS PLAN N4) SrME.I*.O'2Fr AS-103 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 210[x l MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES — — 191H TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17444 $TRECITR 1744, SITE FOR CONDOMINIUMS PURPOSES —- — — ' — —---- -- a �[mxr G ......................... x/. ... .:........... .. ... . . .. RAMI,RE I RO ... ......... ......... ... ...... .. .................... ......... ......... ...._._....._...... .............. .... .. ..... .. E rAY —_. •' \'J�xoD11YlY_ '• - ,, -.•, 1pIL�®71 DfJ��IMIdo/M�t]w1Y to wt s •caaxotle to M x•P Q w•Crs Q LwO I. � and e '�•' ' .. 1, e .' 'Ir .mJY ._.—_�_ .—._.— OJ[wrOr[:.xw:[sn•a•SSOD,mn,n nn w aror .;• - �,L Coe�•s PP'uM p�[OIO[D•x xlaoO:t�Y�Q u.Ps.P].w vn'IiwtaB e ID errs. %.r emvaen ...............{:.. ::: 3:'. '".'. :."•� :,;. . ..,.. ^. .::' � .. ... c'�i-nu¢sa.o•swo,n°n'ox i•xoi„s nx uu[ry R �I rte ve¢> ... .......:__......... .: - ...... .... - aiv�'nD M eta e w r•Ps.P•w.a a[alos Q sm . ....... �T.. .. .. ._-)_'. I ... .... .. ':::::�::-:':•t•...:-::':f. ... wMrW.M,/]w101>aoMA t •. ............... .: .. _, ...::-...:<':: 11.1 oto M uY p% . is�1.::+_... naWSRW•SSDD�eOx. p-K' I roMft•t •...:'�` --I. .. .. .:.. __ - _ �-_ ,. aM[Sm[Ouxir,p[SG![D ilQla o�i[S.Pri e.MCMIs ..... / :.......... ... f.. .i: ...........I. .. ..... .n I ..... ...: ......\..,....... ...... ... ........... :......:;., ... .�. .,.:..:.:.. ,/ x .. ,:.:..:......... .. ......_..' ..."." [ $`•,a< 3' 'owip.;•.\ .r::. .i_rn_ot M sW M•si titixswii'r[it ..... . lrM. srQ[,aaiis,/r. woc I-S,orciw'.�tao w v'loi:ruui`iwe°i.eo r[[i Jm '5 w iR n —1R ramµaxe r UNCI 9 bNiT 10 >_ ,. ,• ,`C. ! s r.Y.us]D[Rsl I. qM xuM .♦ 7 ...i I.s'.: ot>Mitt _ . In[Q�l ' a:Mw \J]�,� xD,M r]Q!m sot>Mnw SWM•lac I•S! -F.+--P]r r.-j) >` -• ..I ;.ev i`-I/ f'r.•. xaot t t. t ln[p/s•o 45t%t R[]Q M xaMMln[IR 0[6 I µQm t 1 - '; —%a '[ i' :>s.• I' ._•r li tw... i ` n ME IN ut Q n<raM tA:tw:El[•st ♦ •": ` I �'., `•:. IJD r11' w 9[rtmM r/]Jm tl I[[t b trA tQ n \ ' UNIT x 's•D SW n�r`t r , ..: :.. i•. Y:.• :..,: �.::...�.. �:,:' .... . ;. .x{ �` .. �; �' .._...... � ni`is'rmi.!'�tot!,Q leen ra..w w]•lw. I ...: _: t ..... :., F 9 a uMl o•¢d0]�e[l'0 Y`S d NQ.P[t 1 BM v , '.:.,,;. SE— UNIT,1e e € 13 4tNIT 12 i ;, o w,l a.r . .! UNIT \ i Wx.<D]I[[ ��� a•ebns[Yr•na•OD Imo • n[vIpn9• a �E GY t WT „ [^ � I :...'..n./.,._`G..�i..///.../.._�:....sxte.t.n:"Y vxn�.t.�ts�A-=,I.-..�..•,.,-�.:.:.:.`.1y....",:... .-'.a)]p x d.�.:.n...:`1..,.—`..:•'�:.-'..:.t..,t..r.:�,.'�./*-U..N.....I.T.x:. ..€,=.'...:1I;.'i0',•'s '•t.?i+I x .1.m-s,.t:Ds,.t,..�n-...ns•—:..x;n.•"„C.'i�:�_".]-w�/{•s•=...1.'�'—�.\'n.A__ :.-♦ -.;....'.1.+.r Z.-y-..II!!...a..��....r�r.F....♦- :..�-...,1i.',A`a x....ii-���€,:x'.• k.,.�]��O� . -. 3.......... ... w > NI n-•.,.'.,:I1I�.am.�.....:.,.®.. _ ...... ir t ...�....TYrx— maxTmnts-ore[ui:rDUt':wwaamvrs0pnr®1w�m��u[ui�sG'twt.�a[a».�: tiSfx.iI;wJIoRireW[]iwx..xp9xxet9�(adtrtJx1Pn]ao.s,xarua'Ma.iw«rQ[%[.EWl. � rQuPoVi],.o-�aQ-[l:une.oxxM�:`. sta a.xsrK.r-msDar sSw.`w,xiWttQlwn a.W,.osw o.M eni].aet n:x. xx„ll[[ww.rmlr" IaaIwMl. n[i[D[ —1-1 eQ P•-tr=D wQ"i.itx1 XNIT. t<rext`UN T b UNfT•G ! :i ML.UNIT 7 t! Ir[Dn mot l iral „c[uwto].rt.r • ."rwI"wI at wu R4 ....... ........... " GRAPHIC SCALE oMS4, ' •c\ [��ccm[..ta .. DMB a wn[x �[D e'- pR.14Mi�rwt` ryla A. CaIWt nrDtw. I ME Re MT sm Ia P•HWxte Vaa DM1e nr NC _ SUBTT17/44&ORC200: Y OF RIWCNO CUCAMONOA,C'- )FORT rAlrtc aw..]A 0 W3W T TENTATNETMCi MAP t1l0 a Ala[!anG 111{,tllq G SIM Ia:(e0e)e0►TtA.1Ae:Ievl 106CI er CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN TRACT NO. 17444 ` 1E]{ 9 4\M�'kN kNGWkkR BENCX AVAN: -- ------_-- IEWcDESCFPiWN . w qnm rss 'rn;y'ror s .0 x <w N� ,10 FWT r.Xwr aV;11. F` rr''1�+>�ia�oal`w ' wu•o.r W'u•'[iam>x �i�tya• r vw., �$a X,wa�".wa>:'Y-;y ..�...a[xnnw>.�.a.•n.N�a�.> 3a°d� >wl�* enmrar-s, r s BASIS O:uE ANxGsm�N'�� .a Nu a•x ioiu'�wl:cr ns I'l'N 5`RFFT a mXlr r pa rwm xvwsura1. TR 17444 fideo r`.Yw m Mwi10 situ ADORESs� WE • a ,. r �p „niry ilLiAi%ve '• FNrINWW[X - NTa11T—EVMS: F NONIC Y'157A ST DmLLin w"rwa,..¢Isww Yi - ie ma'nroruvcr n xK u rra ro n.n o cvuc rP. ru•tWI`�"'b,v u,laao-nrr1. BASEL NC ROAD xnn.M x.�Xan rNr w w row s a[ouwc rmvo N ma rE o x.n.w n n[ms w un tarn I IL" U µ09IHEIANkA' ---- rn I+ur xoia)/rurr v U:e�.oal rr �� • _• LOCATIONMCINITY MAP I a . pSi gBOTED AREIL X01 IO SEMI ASSt330H3 PARCks NONBFR �✓ i'+'axW],�fa.'w> I »v gal a,.uva oan�X sr mn xlia o,m�N„>ow SHEET PJDEA w.w sl-a ( [A a sea `sE VI1513A..TI1EE'r'V -__..J taaaw:µa i wan � w\ . WTEW[M BE Ti u rua.o.rtil�-4•YDN EASWeHI rmr — .r�RDND.rR,W�EW.~ PCON:£PIDri nIIM P ] 7 m+w>>r vnrw� Irm fARMa rrxLr PITv ; I,-.. r} _ it t __ .rrar.a+o.+:o ro[.roaau-,awm[n.rn.r Pu\rlWa.P s� rAulucE lar a ..ash. . ��xB . IFa _ Iw[ 1— lE .INPNat•LL4xis uW s s V 3 WDIDs.e]GC b1631 iZ w,:a r'IPoND—E,TVP�.rXv _` y;; . �,u xf_; z s �' .,I.I\ .al...�• ' � .,,,..�.x. / ` . 'Pr�i —�Iw�..., y SECIIONA-A - - _ SECTION B-0 run[xs -a SECTION CL,rr�.w I f I 1 F"Tw-a W Z LL ad TYPICAL SIDEYARD DETAIL _ N_ rw� r .. -YA > Z m> SIDEYARDORAIFIAGE-TYPICAL LOT O�¢Q Q F N.1., z z d } ,�...� � ;: — ��:• wok z 2 `\ •I r r raa•� _ 1> NM,,, re wJ ^ .. i i�. �.e z WO Lei U 6 luin.'_�I i •rnlw _ ; v I—ilµiriiiuj . I n ax wW.r. r rr i j I as vv,q.. `_-•-_ •• _ _vc I 1 I l it u rr _ tl Rri I I I nu. I � •XI r 4ei�xs � L'-' on�SLCTIOHDO i.lk SECTroN F-E.rs:rw I•f SECTION FF r[XNx I•3 rrxn 5m srca 4 xxi—•_�y SEC111314 jO-GL`l'. I lv DRC2013O0583 —� %kwm—%DQ013%13I4-T3Mang R.C.AlchlbaldAa•,M—,ViawE"es 13,.kACGu31<go2.dM IlArA I.9.2.1. .PM, d.SLA—:) Luall pop f SEE SHEET 7 jIr-2 3' j qq r 18 9 fin d. .......... j z a r I)-;Nq fiv ti r 9 J! a p ji X� CSL MONTE VISTAVf .......................................... ........... IIIIIll JTrE�"SIDENCE CONDO SUBDIVISON C WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVE AT 150 FT OF MOKITF VI.CZTA.QT Qlll;�N%l; T....'.A. .-7:.�, F as& W&W Led Nolm cm."&L. �E BLOCK WALL PLAN , j ,.M wILM/a tl M[SQ,MO C,.•f.b raw..calf Y[[DICYaI[_w.w Ew[[m,NO•waf f•rK rq[:10:[Cr q 0 f,ux.9 11Mw as •w..w 9w[ E WED 1 w D Iq qa mYC[xr vYirMa..l[!fwK rq VIIn4• —----'--' ---' — —-- —--'-----—-------- —-—---—-—-—-------—-—' ;. ,;. . . . ..... .... .. ......._.............. .. .... _ . . .......... ----- .-—•--_��-:. -.r.'__--—-- -. —--—-..=rT_-rr. - --.�.- _- «_ _ - ..ten-.•.��.+-a+r...,+� R.... jam......... �.j .: �.'. .': � �r.[♦. .'..armor. �' _.__.--•_-._...__._......_- ... .. .�. � .__.:.yam'.,._, ....,:• ......... ... _._.. ............. .. ... ..... __.........._... ...... : .. rr } - rrs i xx i rra t. ......_.._.... _.__.. { ,i r^ -,", i i �i �. ;." , 1. . �•��.i`'�'<4�:r1♦ •` i. .. -_ list__:_ . :'.,..... • : jj M , n �.i c': DDa_.4D..,: ,I::;,i' :u`_m�O°IRr�• , f 1 ar•a 1MM1 a - .. ..... 77 -...... .. ..._. w.aa w ........... [ v _._.._._._. _.._ .m.,[ i • a t- _ r 1 fo.aa� I� [3. w �'( 0 Si' .A.�a••,�w i � - "'10::w'R'._ g w•D.c.w[ I PREMIETER WALL DETAIL in 0 �E � w —1v Rfar:ian aoor www p E t'e.DfD.wr Hoar 0 U i i U 9 i w W O .. ................. ...........,.. ................. El GET@ U be®rmn� : a. __..... W a ...... .......... .. .._. ....._...... _... am.aa W ^ fr.._...................................... o is iW r_q:--y p�.l r0fr _IVC[qv,r. b ......�_....... ..j .... ....... � 1�}-�roCri.[LOmM KW,W+O�MaDS�•Si[..r....r,.r AV b�� .�. � ... •...... _ 7 �O C rfw ro[arta [. m•.rmra art r.n[r_nuawo M b� .. .. .i w an�afsrw art v[gws•w•na rp _ ^"'[� L s.l mrw sr.us a an www WE _ _..... ........... ........... .. .. IwMM[_R0u[fl Mf CMD[ .[rK Nlp f i _,.wc r1[: nawi rro aw,ror°'°OV1'wrc w[oas wrto ,;-„ i EfNa'nv PLUS rL.KVlr 4-RAIL SGL G.4 TE PREMIET WALL DETAIL our�ra C20' or 7 sD•r EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS , —ozl� i GRa5P1r1C SCALE E 3 Sita W...Toole: Uned),It.d Site Stratum Sur11 SuA2 Cul FIN 105-Pinewove RC Archibald Ave ._. IOSew-01 misting proposed 3773 855 291 ((C8(CCo 405ew-02 existing proposed+l 1077 1200 2073 � Grid mposite 2165 2171 JI(C} Grid 2720 2108 Be ) Composite ........... ... ... . .... ....... ................. ....... .... ............ ....._.................. .. ........................._ ... ... ........ ... ...... 'k, 1 ....... ........ ................................. .......... .. , 1 17 s-...._. ... .r , ....................... ........... _ .... ..•i a.. ... • _.....—_..._ • - 9 .t.. F. �.. .. .. w 5.-.... r X $% A Y#. pe NJ In _ ,•� .>. ... _. .�_....._ ... .... . ._ ....:� fir _ A. f S .. .. .. .» {s sax. F( t +p p �. .tin.:...` i ... .. +11 i i .I ^:tea.,...:i.......::....... ._ { ,rax �, : .v �.. .•;. .: •a a.' ,..: ::...;1 .,.;, ... .: 1./•�. ::1 f t ol - s\ y : i t .: t:+ ..? `�y _ .s 1 r- - - Lie i -' .: .. ...... :its- ....._...�:n �.-: a t 1 {{ ,.,\:.:. �.��.. m — ... �+�, °'L. F1rCC`E a :� :1: •'1: �� f d o, /;' z m , L " } 1 ..` ... 1 l.•, •. ....._ ,..I.{r:. y�,'`a}fes/^,ri� , , ll ...��.. .vim,. n , ... ..'^ .......:. .� :. }� < ...... ata„ a .. �i y W 1 42d' ............. 3 werr Sxur / DRC201}00689 IF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA j PRELIMINARY WQMP SITE AND DRAINAGE PLAN TRACT NO. 17444 MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES . ......... ........ ....... . .. SUB-AREA CS AND C-2 DOES NOT DRAW TO PROPOSED SUP , .... STRUCTURE.NOWEYFIL THE AREA , WAL BE CALCULATED.AND : ' . :.... CONSDERED INTO WF127MTION 711136• INET .......,.. ._ 1 .. .... .... ... .. _... '=243K .. _ _ _ .... D8 ......._..-....,..... ...TREsrN 91Q•:i _ ....---iRENCN�IPI�1 ..._..w .�: � ___ ...,._.. - _ C ..:^:. - - .... .r.' .i DIa[Rr W': 416E . 1. . . ::.:.. 03]0..4404 q -. -. ............ .... .. ........... a' ..:' �.►Br'i1J 4r Re!;r Er.r r ar r r i.r'yN 4.r rr r r r 1�,�r .-_.-...-......_...-.._ _ _ _ B.'`. 'r . .I > % ✓ - [[ i�. i , ..... : TCP mer ito.7D7.E6.o3] , i E'r]e i . w 'Tiw �jf `i t j, e _ 0.55' .`..•�1 - � T r i S 1 ^7 --�•� I r; j C 3. �l; 1 l ) ............: TI - 1 � r , > \ .. . 00 A,2 \' i p ,T i ( "• '�1.. i" .... r STENCIL SAMPLE 1 :i t e ...... R , • ....... � I ) w LO :I _...............................A._( .. g E �.___..-..._.._...�..................................-......... ............ .. ......................... ... ........ AM W 0 I I � I f Z F O •.'i RESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR MAINTENANCE A INSPECTION 10.0' > CONS,PUCMMI: p ENR aESOURCES LLC WOMP BMP MAINTElNNCE SCHEDULE wOMP SMP ALNTUDINAL E LOGITUDINAL aesR.<A�ol—1.1, m 180 SOUTH MEAL SI. MAYD n � 4.0 ROL :3 AE CITY OF INDUSTRY.CA 91748 SO-LS STORM DRUM SIGNAGE L-LO:WFL x TRENCH wiR_EPATDN MCNCX BMP el 1'F1A TArlt f;.I G CONTACT: RALPH W Q�R,p DESIGN CM4CITY VOLUME-7,680 Cf RITR NRA 'i ice'::f!' c Z• "�"�- ,iE (676)975-1605 uy"-T,& scmFnmF,LEDROLHY Of STENOLS A41' ¢-�'E: 1X4 NnLTMnON TRO.CII 5 %.-C;!�. '+y-x ':w:�>:: 0 AND 51GN5 MUSE BC MNNTYWED 0•IIOW OF LOCATED ALONG EASIEALY PROPERTY UNE WITHIN IS-I E.S ql1'r}�`- PROPOSED LMDSCAPRIG AREAS. THE TRENCH SHUT. 13{.1]8842--L t7.S9384O1 R1A,,MPt POST CONSTRUCTION: ASSDCYTION.ME OWNER WR MAINTAIN IT YEAALT % INSPECTED ONDLY ND uxnlAnLO AT LEAST .a ;,i Cfi .'G:' Cf F OR MORE OREN,IF NECESSARY. 1MCE A YEAR. PRIp1 10 OCTOBER TRENCHES T•E`9:{: L,•I:� ''±� •i QHOMEOWNER FOR EACH RDMMPL SYLL ES BE E INS C AM LMCA[ ST BY A WHLTF1ADOx TRCNCH BYP 12 �.�Y,' ,l�.),'i;;•L' ?' LOT AI TIME Of OWNER ACCEPTANCE O—FII[5 ll BE N.PRO ER uM DISPOSAL O 0.A DESIGN CAPACITY VOLUYC 4,780 Cl W LL v vs f nIYY wAP[DOx DUMIFI[D 1[DMCMH wM PROPER OKPoSµOF ALL .i::.3. ��.: (J O W �X ANo STE. WFLIMMN TRENCH R SZED PER CASH: i=>.%k.�' ;•,:-lJ.< .;• . n LEGEND u.:Hl n• L�`' ISE-17]848.-11].59]6611 y�[y _ Z W NOW OF `s+'.Z:.....:..i.������ W N HIALLEbAtICE-RESEQNSIMM OI 50-17.EFFICIENT IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION WILL WNTMn SItE EVERY THREE :Owx[P I UP MONM OR MORE OFTEN E NECESSARY.ME xOI:iWHIO�aamhE Lu \_\yam.�...„ .._........r...,.... O W-13.STORY DRAW SIGNAGE CATCH BASINS SMALL BE INSPECTED AND CLEANED DMOItl4-501®CE:OMNLR h4Rwl uJ `.qLY N,W 5 W ON A SEMI-ANNUAL BASIS BY THE OWNER AID WNWELBuri-waffJOS:MONTHLY WBp"VON AHD RI [oW+LLNU �� Z O7 SC-74.MANAGE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE SHALL LL SP EQWL�aWANED BY THE ED CONTRACTOR W,W,EHAKC ASI IM. WOMP BMP AS�V0.T CERTIFICATE i X-1¢NFamAnaN TRENCH INFILTRATIONTRENCH O ON AN ANNUAL FREQUENCY. SIYIMP WYE.WHEN CMIRUCTgN K COM+LETE. I HEREBY RRWY MAT THE NECESSARY WAFER WALIFY MWAMMENT RAN BEST MANAGEMENT xN To NNE NIACTICE DE NAW BEEN CQ49NUCY[O UNDER MY SUPERWSION AND ARE NNCDONAL ID THE Q SC-73.LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SC-43 PARKINGATORACE AR•!MAINTENANCE BEST OF MY KNORLEDGC AS OF ME DATE BELOW © SC-43.PNiNNG/STRIAGE AREA MAMMMANCE PARKING LOIS AND INNS AISLES 70R NE SWEPT 4EIOOIN LAI REE vUANc C PRPRCI BOMDARY WEEKLY BY A SWEEPING CONID TRASH 70 PREVENT RIxT NAME SIGNATUREDATE _— SEDIMENT.HE STORM WASTE.AND TRASH THE N A TOR EACH 805NDART ENTERING IW STORY DRAWTAIN SYSTEMS.THE NOW RAL1 WHIN EOR EACH SUP ASSOCIATION R1Ll WWIMN SITE MEALY OR MORE g FLO• OFTEN R NECESSARY. ENGINEER SITE PLAN FOR CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MHP C!L ARCRIBAID AVENUE wvael.earou •' 10 cDtA. i .......... veaaso K .........:....: • .iv`:an1a aei �-ia',� "le!e•v .\ :`c'• e. �. n o� ,S ;\:'..^'w' /\, a.• �• t<.,• -•lt .�\.,:,�..t., ` :.. ;�.'l:.•Yc• '�;:�. w1'°°ar9iav i1� w.m \ ! �. Y` r�•/\, '\/ ''�l :`.' `.:Ci. i� \ aq; ro.vvaR"tea rWtvc V[HRNNEL DETNL® \?• �. .} \::'\\: \:•.?`s:'\..:{ ` e sww.o,mrwew m a aoe Mn cu r•.:v, \:i''�' ;\T'\ y`�,44�`�,,` \:� �Y.:fes.�'��'. '�," �;' .. '4+Z-. f` ti w \ EMTING N t f GHAPAF2FZAL MGM.y �,� �r •�� �. MOBILE HOME PARE( ; ES .�• :, .: .}''':. 'r _...................... (FOR u p5fnYlWx i �'°F, p � W .._....... a:.\;;\/� �,'`�:•� ....I e"F \\.''� �"S\\�" i Y�:. � c..cur•ror.c,.mc.c M.nrwr • � � .ae�.,:,•K Lu .. I. . M fn P;4 y",Re a xwe a.x0 aw !y:'��•�.. \•..1Y��' le'..+, .. :i ! ___ _ ui W Cwmel2r!a'11..IKn•O,xreo.MO M.n S[rw l v[tu, T '^ ® I�oxsnul e• we Me OM1 a W/S]CuwW14151D. .a.4 x0 g vI o .'.•y\ \\, u1s+u.r nx cos.u- . ..... ....... ..... r..... . ... ;> N'l�Ael A\,A: U) i, v f;.l;r'.. \`'a\:�• v\':. Z 17o fn Do zQ Q D1 o Z x a' O U 3 U a W 2 w d W 0 N V1 LNU �ZQ of DMPNIG SGIE fi ..oenrlo� DRC20134)(IM C D/A CREAT r VE DESIGN afSOCIaTEf <w+resume r r.n..a..P,.w.... M;iiww.vi.. Estates - - - - - - - - - - - _... ENR RES LLC LC l^ ---- '--- -- — -,- --- • 1 :!sea sr.... , / ..'. y I ; I /I `>. 1 r1/r.'.l I I nl•E x ..'�.,...nrE xl .,' I(I rrr at.•:. I:.. �..� �•�, o �I Imu I I:. IT n I u t Im I I ou z 6.. -- 1f19aV zz v.' lrviv I'.` rll•a tm u IU ir, I, IINn? r n+Ia ones. ulu. M am" ' I \ _ \\ . I,,.� •. WIa 401x1. 10,}I. O T i \ I \ I i \ IINII IU Or/\ �! _...r:` \\ •��':1 ,- �.:::. I.aa� amv. rear. C 'r'IWSam". .1.ff, I/•. JAI �le SJE r .'•....,. �. .. _ • 7 Y. 71 -.II �•:(.:��::: oaf war. oov. �.• /�.. 11 r'N'r:.1.1 �\ � .. �1•—T_A_L..lIINII ons Watr. L6� :. i �\ /� F� u+rD tn+u. vtL. _ •''iW S- raYN,n ftnv. ff I I { .!.. / •-•lel-.:,< ..�..:.: araeae, a aaa are Open space z CI TIM.BI r17Y.'nl -t- UNI ' z IINII, �`---I--'• » IMI16 IMII a IINII• "' '-" i I 77 ,)1. :1177�c i O OPEN SPACE CALCULATION DIAGRAM N® SI:YE rv0+.ro'�0' AS-104 00:" Q,:���•O.0 O.Qq QO�'i1:' 1v•_ 1 -•_1G'^v_ 3.3a -n .i:� P: ! .' _ +.r•. ii .. � �■����� �� � �� ` -��.M. .f,..���j�/,��`��%%✓rte'u (�, �YT_OTTO�?'►C�j!' © 1"1j0%_� r/►1,.:r-%�I� .� ' .�;.�:::;,, � � �eeeo��� q� a�� - ` Thr �:.:•: 1� '�����•i.'•0.••i�ii�i iii��i\fir O 77� / ::�.!Y!i�.'ii.•i i••ii ��'i'.I \��0 + ori re no ^\\C:;Y7�JI � - - o , low or00000A.00, d`e'o�:+:� 'e��i��l•�•to€� __� � r"-', �1` rr � •,�U NEW �► F r10fp if 0 Cl�.e e� Yr1 fQ r r, �' \ •�� � „ `i PLANTING LEGEND $ �° ®0 TREE ° ° °EYM ry BOTANIGL NAME i �f II LS a ee COMMON NAME i U U s JKO & O, 15 Slreel 7roa Pa Gly lka iNal 4 . r'eo i Nb�iirr- 111111111 11111-cmr-r— ® ll K-Ilihilmia blpinnato =1r®—.3 SPF,4 s Chinese Flame"Free �)P��t�� UNIT O ) eo Curopea"Swan Mill.' - r Olive e 0>,,,,f on 6 py)us collerya 9 e ) 6 s Ornamental Pear 4 S r_ O 52 s� coffdio Caribbean Cop . a Plant a F SHRUB/ACCENT 3 0 4 C t Rosmarinus o.'Benenden Blue'' Rosemary SGoI 80 Dietes bicolor 5Ga1 Fortnight Lily 5 �Jl�ymytVYr ® e'a Corex oshimensis'Esegdd' i 1.11>dta 1Gol variegated.Japanese Sedge f ®IgR916 JVdtpdd EXISTING N 14 Myrlus communis'Compacto'Mpll o I�IdllaOoyvtoa ® MOBILE HOME 0 5Gal C uI=I PARK 7'a. pelafgoium pellalum IGol Ivy Geranium ,s Asr♦..� ® "'le n.PE�)/ 310 Phormium Jeno.'Bronze Baby S=y CM�!�LLC END 'aa 5Go1 New Zealand Flow 3 _ cwarwo voa REIaC�TIp y,a II 11'N UNIT'B Wa Geranium'Johnsons Blue' e h ccum 'rt. UU IGaI Cronnesbfll y ��— (D ® Is�.q 1� s 36'a Nassella tmuiss4na Fske. 5Ga1 Mexican froth"Gross - 1�'1n�� ra n a 1C°ol` Carex Testocea a�� = dalton � 1 ' 148 Corpenleria colifornica T1 I) Ii Is Is SGoI Bush t r a .a li i N s 76 Disliclis is V'Rives' e a T E C7'1'PE C! + 5Gal Ro 1 Trumpet Kne I 1T 7 UNIT 7 d 14 Ficus pumuo 1 an" SGol Creepin F' _ ® Feslucu ofundifloceo i Tall Fescue Medallion sod % E ' F a I f All trees to be planted with c—ercial root barriers. 2' deep shredded Cedar bark If.spread Nei Taal 94 TRIai on I a Sio r t 22 Mtn beteeen plants. TOl'il40-2fr8oxTroallueotosi0lz42%dTikWCMN All growdcover areas where plants are 4'°c or greater to have 2 layers of geatextile fabric in.2 rfifferent • �� directions geotextile fabric Installed 3'below finished grade e/ ` 3' Shredded bark above to elininate weed growth I 45ewa ( e L-2 Am fdf WATER CONSERVATION CONCEPT STATEMENT PROJCCf SITE. Mountain V1AW glatpc RPJECT EFERENCE • 13023 6 JK Design& PROJECT LOCAT,I7N 6910.6946 Archibald Rancho Cucamonga Ca 91701 Associates•Inc. LANDSCAPE A665&M Cerra,Road DESIGNER I K DESIGN h ASSOCIATES wii .'CAN-91789 i T:62631117769 MAWA MAXIMUM APPLIED HATER ALLOWANCE 1 F:•68MMM12 (E 10)(0.6)(LA)(0.62)=HAWA.EXPRCSSED W GALLONS PER YEAR i E:pda2002@W-d.mn (ETD) REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION(W[HES PER YEAR) • �� 0.6 ET ADJUSIMENI FACTOR LA THE AREA OF THE LANDSCAPE(SQUARE FOOT) 9 0.62 THE CONVERSION FACTOR(TO GALLONS PER SQUARE FOOL) 1. CITY MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE (MAWA) OR WATER BUDGET: 6 trial Are. to be lands.p.In square feet ss.f.I A--- E10(47.5)X(0 8)X 23763 50./LA X 0.62= 589322 gal.y yr. 6 2. ESTIMATED APPLIED WATER USE:(EAWU) 8---EEO(47.5)X LOW PF(0.2)15769 SQ/LOW HA X 0.62;-0625= 156626 ga.yr. _ naiar.n.. C---E10(47.5)X MEDIUM PF(OLS)X X X(162;-0625= X gat./yr. Mountain View D---ETO(47.5)X HIGH PF(0-8)17974 50./HIGH HA X 0.62;-0.625= 316408 g.l./yr. Estates E---Total EStinated ovped voter Use in gallons ver ye 473034 gal,/yr. 6910.6946 Archibald Rancho Cucamonga ams Is o c.nst.nt ..ter need.owe calcmosed fur tms nydro:one In rias❑ty. Ce,01701 F.Total Estimated Appled Water Use shorn in E must be equal or loser than s Prsw•6 , City Water Budget(MAWA)sho.n in A In oder fa project to pose. 4 ENR Resources LLC rr E: 473034 GAL/YR < A: 589322 GAL/YR = Oh I (p Written Water Conserva Lion Statement: 3 - INS WrNscape dni)n Wr -Dlanl .ial snasr.mo mem la}nla•iffl-.1-i n7aa '.1 L...R.daale, . .... @� aHanl�the PA n mea are drwpnI IWreryba mnv,W d lurl Tan m.a u I'vrilyd in.Y.aM N ' conceptual mx�d poah•nowlunol ice l.d Om.used b a dr"14 I .t mean.rl P In.w6pfiari ryslem.ses dap a lo.Ib.thr gbaul mato.1 tM bM.w mea.Emeh7arozone is an v 3 landscape I opard.Inigabvn•d.e.M outaMrt cadraar wlA roil.led-aft.g,may i.u.w Iv dfiew y inpal.0%.-n Iard.taPe aid a.•enl.mle d.M.A 3'-6'iW W.a d axach is—4 la r.I n mdigis.in 9..vf I design NJ I D.tv, 12/20/2013 Prepared bye Al 1 '••""` °•'• w @)W ArrER CONSERVATION STATEMENT :0'E .nane = This Is. tantl.o ter rived volae110ted far this hydroz t See Cplete City orasrgncv for.atvr budget derl...ons and f...Was i used tg Colc Wote the values adipted by the City. L tl 3 ALL PLAY GROUND EQUIPMENT AND SURFACE INFO CALL ProDek Inc X ATTIC — t P.E-[.SI caNatLl.rx TEL: 818-502-2111 A •••••••P.s FAX:818-502-3331 nt..v—zar W/2-3/a o u.e y Ms. f Kl lave W P I i LIN l/cw.z-NSlucco t ./caNc.r.P. W/1X4 PLAHI-ON O All 9_S_ _ CPna•h me.nwal.n v.lm. 3/e'K.CouesE rmarl 9.AI•CL PI al bmf 1/i Pr Iml mP•CI CaleY-erPIN—ES e.••.r•I•.ne,ll p•Irl.•eWoge. =al 11 - - 901 CO ,qo - B.B.000UNiER - - sLeu+wr - - . u II cgtic rmlerL 1014 pEPM V.NXS tl/ Sea p SRRU•.AE. 8 f.Ll NI.AfaAPYENIS -- P I T F PN �• WP.c,cans.-oEPm y.ees I j, POST TO FOOTING • d;; t` 4 NrAeO. . ! f7nu2ou ,� *- .3023 [aXA[,t ow WIKI•.Y KT.9 C OVERHEAD DETAIL OVERHEAD DETAIL g naVr error L-3 dlw]tl7 i t�� WALL TYPE sxsawlC D/1 urrool laL © i,-•gpEyy+p�ay�.p , .,e. CREATIVE O[SI 6iaL'Td"iu r7eapaa ASSOCIATES t ® •EPS `!#Raw Avtlaaweafporo.r n3 ni r worNarwua.ra!aumemnwwl %wian'e1p1m ® xpN.EaeDltlparK■gr 4fN.AOf-fa•P4®. ry 'r-r e�• ,r-r - ,'+•„ r-r tm,/r■pw Lrrr a. w a• eotlo ... O <@> '�w"Sieti!!'So+S'°&".1p-L'1e41ISoprp p � ¢ I 4 ® �a�■�+�oaare"wfolinra ' ..r • a®aa a fa Mountain View p L- 4 ❑: Estates at. I 1 . e � __- ! b - ./W■sear m.a O O ; I Mi p b 1 ` aY:Sm bpi LC� ` I :...................- ___. _... .J............... ........o»r ............_....... pr[wa. t � ,■.., m ,m../tltlxf■ ..:.. .-... r, waa,afwmun nnn a.Nn:n•aL ENR ' 1 l L.S. 4 bEQLaK 1111N f x,■r aaa,S9L s,ra■ ' i} -!,• / rr• a �-i,:,, i /m : ! a me0cm!a r�'�°a�"w�.L RESOURCES,L rwttm w" D.■n rmL�:apmr,r 1 : : 2,,Q ` II �-'�-% �_ 0[■LOT ONeLf M04 eW i6 i 1 •` m ' Y // •� j i R \ tlpel�a�,fy�wu sr ! • trop - Rewerr ry pat nurWmw I ! Aa rO i, B 1 .......... ......_ ......, rpalla l�'100 .,.f. IT !; 1 ¢ ❑ i�'!' j.I Fv I, r-T.. 1• ifpa'pra'm"Wipcwmwr O O C FIREPLACE SPECIFICATIONS: z z w Y r••F a } rr u oaa+-rN srAao-mrrsew m[oar Cl a: '� 0 K ra..r.w.'i`-`n riuwa[r"naL"n' <i U k i , �' a 4�r p w xnrmaca■n.Id[..-r awL..o mnex,ro vac Y • L [CI,IIW �} 1 L,rr.Dpl , ._. ... ...... ... [ >d11 tmrwu tlr w p-L a w Laca.a[rrx C nw.ralpr i L ii[■Imes ana fwaaa en Nawf m olalm. ..•, f TTI r ra-a,l eraea i ! 4 GENERAL PLAN NOTES <aa,a.e• / I 4 y 'nw"inun r ao[paQuc w.w.an'�p°av[s. 'a�•• :•o-eN `x•"i''L n`, a.tlL!ars[a vert Dooes ro K taw coat,a/e' i 1 ! 4 V o .� _aav wD:.tl pr nun M.a am a i i �'� re wm,Lass"rlw m uwm'win nfriSL'I�["["sl.°'�°i E r O 1 Y ..........:................. OA ..A 11 000as[ a wLo a/L•,,.ow a L N-,r r-r f.w.,[naav mr:a„ ro a sat cpa,a• — — ——— ———— ————— loan rsvmn ar-•• ❑E ��iL m,rw ��i rdf[+mcx ,ry r-n• ro r-,r r-r s• - � ! oD�:tlw[Nu d f.a MW nn[I■rarwex MW,a""'ir LIRl11'�UM�OF[�'NIIL f9'MLawaOYT'[xf4!"p 9pL"L`B[ ! � u.'cii`wwi nc'namaMfDfmtic.eio:01pw�oros'a' o,....f ru.. ,r.N.wpar[arrtNw ar',1'�'r[Nwr[ci�•r° TYPE AS pcapl a r.aaL w aaL r uaur r:us tl coaaL Floc/PianR im"Naev srL¢s Nan fna s'Yr rn.o,eL ryaa r:• mrxa,wa tuna utl wmD eor rs oaf a,m Cp■re■}p a4@I[af 0.WmCO ro•a,Q■at■D pKi Kxe■af•I Al bPs[ra®q,Yr{' eat-WI,otic o Y!R,/Oan NC■LLnatl MCA IlrwrJKD.cppaClN ro [plar/■e/e 0.l tet x,e 6pr■rara M II1(CIM 2 FIRST Fi00R PLAN i STAB INTERFACE 'm•a^"�".Door. ca. ew• tu:.r : SLAB KEYNOTES �mar[[L pe.0■.e-■Drt w r F21 c TTH- �MrrRL MI.per-Ap(Yr./:R•R0, M rw fK roa DnD-W f-rl—.Q A a uvap r ua vss rw.••.rwr A Com. SLAB INERFACE SPECIFIC NOTES ,.ItRal[SVM.-ear N na a— Spf W,A.eKOpp b sM KNalvr ann ' N�WOnw tY�'wpM fx LLglarrf!w,r M aDl rM MID- N •OfN.tgp- aA�rp ri Y:M K ro i nMM1i D.i� 'a.wl'a'tlx[tame v.Dir wA-wa -'a D.L•:,,-. A-101.A1 ..a•u pori[pfrtr • • 0 DI ) ROOF KEYNOTES CD/ QQ c D O 'bl w�.00•I!I'0dirr�rur-r.ralu.o vor-aww mea CREAT I V E O 3 y R,r. 1 nc ASEOCI A' N'), Im owai.c l ISIPisora k s o. r Td •.r W-3- .. IPd ❑]1/N WHH L•1Ril-nrar i.a°aa L�i6 ._.. .. ... . •r•r d 4:12 4:12 I i..................._ turn/morn o m.rarm ' rd gaea�r4 rw0.r ��- rrr a b o-- I I ............... ----- I 4:12 4:72 ------ - -� - - - -- e rROOF f aN.rO3HTMmES0.a:NNrnmri6 wNn6rI_aro mDo•reasarrnnen-0P.rr Mountain Vit 100F 2 -- - ---- .Dor cwrnwa vwi uo euair RK,— StBEOS 4:1z E r pT ti i © s >ti.Dos sru a ry o u w nos ur w..N,. a Neo-sras ra mao-vrl M ammo auouss a - tsar Ir 0 i¢i r10 I * ) M rr al•mYr OKsi[Ypa 4��unn e l i ).m wara°`a•sire rsnrm a w m lu wowr. I H T 4:12e mMYq WH m M•I6VaW a amr•a rrWraf •. c ¢ •_ � OO i I amNsn.,•o:'rr wcaro � i` �~I fvua..'a°' i� ¢ s rrlosau ri.nc i i«'rrr i w°lio m vn iii inw:wi isas ¢ �J 00 ¢ur-r.rr•L' I I Ia R o a.rrD u �„n.Ir a.rN.lMn ra..Pms EMR 4 y Td r ' ..ran roe.reoRe ro m ti 00 r v.s a m m RESOURCE; IY W r...�I.a= rD rrm r»w r.• M ........Y o o - ¢ ni ren•a nm'varo.rrsu mwvan'o s'.wa ae ro I O J ; I cmc 4.,Wr .. i y. o.f`.s ai vua.m Israae•awro mown ra or e L Z EO0 4 12 4.1 ¢ O u.,r�•n�iafsn rr`Paics fr.•aN y.a m.af-r a,H•M. ••.J •. O 0 4:121 i'! CD ROOF/ATTIC VENTILAWN CALCULATION O t, ] I rr ofv eW do Cmc rN GMua mM TM w.m rw.ra moor•ra scrwrw slc.ac r.w.�„x O U IT ,. 0 D i `> •G� I ..tau w r'nur:nrY°uoun n riinicrirrr H°r.,`�crorne� rrcc WE ROOF] I I r. c�unY°c o:Rr wrmurlll a rrr w noun arsrre rest ~O�O V '} �' F .H W rorr N[r SMLL MPr.a W4ulD n aHulow trait. ED I. a: z i O >>ao�eow otoe`c u+a"ac:4n °raaf"c zz � ¢ le w R �WF 7 VENIIIA-N REOLERED 12nd Rood t0.1 n ° I 'nl i O � � I �v.b-ton sd Iron NMWM rr.nwam w-r.ad1 nl ROOF 3 VENRLATION PRC; DG(2nd float TI >> 1 I w X.r°raiib01 k Ul ..-....... C"im 4:12 4:12 4: — pJsx. R......._................_: F Ij IROOFIVENUTAiION REQIIRtED . s-r rd r/uo.� •a w•nwao Imr HIDUIIWr rnA 6an4¢rr.Ia�rSf I red ROOF 1 VENTILATION PROVIDED 0. NI NM u(,•N f t ' - •IM Hrlf O N S1[Yx•IN fr. rn sr/nr. rW�NNurW Tim.•fwaR¢�U L.>r It S ROOF 2 VENTILATIONREQUIRED n ROOF PLAN ii uai.rsou.).oi:rsnW.r N•nww rr•uwalm c TYPE Al Vrl,aSEORAN Roof Plan rC.NOPROOF 2 VENTILATION PROVIDED w+r. tM NM:1�•ul ' )IM ltYa O Nff r LrM.]b u ' rmr HmueWl•w rroa¢r.0 sr.>r.m ar, co•r,.,.0•• �� ROOF VENTILATION CALCULATION ' Rr rrrouar wDr•;mD[a err rmrrro ' srra repot rWawr me Nmanp sour uw.rwr a iµrN a nrurorr'r•m o r.nosso um ort a�.nnro rpW 4r n(N NMrrna D0.rt A• N brr Yrn YW�r ro1rH¢OWn a sGMipr rM.rq WniDire aR/nrrt M•rr•ur fWisO Ou[fM,f rent .. G IR CDnmerae Rene or 0.aer tmerroe trrl `�ara.�il ius iamc sar^asc+Y°A°w-urtRor la lar ....•' [ate mw Qs A-102.A 16P. TTP. TIP. 6 1 1\P 7 l e IE 1 CD/ CREATIVE OE ASSOCIAT n a rm bar rru AM11Ora Ylrtl I - -- - - --------- ----------- --- -- - - ---- -- - --- -- -- r.artl\In r.\N\ane II0\lYrrr dirt _ �r error nr!1 yr' .K !�'M?!..: !F R'1F}r'v'r.. �K., ✓ �YWL [/4 1!1'LSii/.i � � r Y:rMOrrn4yw V .u.'>•.'xw a ..,.y.vV. ::. : .'S'v:. Ia �vv r,ni Wi• ',ii rl y}�F yvvv ,r"1.;I/�t•�' O '�'%jtY vvirvvi-i,'xvV'da© i' titiii vxj�� 1�f:t•i•ivy' © O ::: } ,►<�i 6+. O t Mountain Wel ::•J':. 't: ---- - --------- .. ':rA amen - - Estates E v • ,.� :I wm:,a,rrnry :l aye IF I �1� - ;,:; 90 ----- --.---- --- ------------ - "' -- ESOURC , ENR R ES 4 RIGM.LEVAT/ON SPANISH STYLE) T FROST ELEVATION SPANISHSTVLEJ "`• ITP. 11P. irP. i P. 11P. I P. -1- F F Z 0� o 1st rc rF zzo� -------- - -- -- - ----------- 10. - - ------ - ------------ -- -- - -- --- - ------ c4 3 --- a'p' Y... W;r, n":(IY.V�`Y ,, .KirM . . 4'H .� Y'Sf K.NYv'y�+l!'N'1f.'v' "" b { Y 1 -oo- vv, ,v _--------- rVV Iiii .YWYWV,:'J' V'Y t{,!,I' 1/ v1, a j1�... ------ ,Y:Yif:i4 rl ti/•vj!W., - - - - rMr - - ---------- - - ,f !M Y `. Yr 4tKvwv �14 V1/Sh: FTre'Vi/Tr,R,7F ��'• ,. 01 ............ . � ......._.1..._.__ - -- _. _.. ................................. .. ........_. 1. kY; •TYPEAI - -- ----- ------------ - ------ E/avaaom r1 LEFT ELEVATION(SPANISHSTYLE) /1 R�ELEVATION(SPANISH STYLE) Ll MATERIAL LEGEND DCSCRIMION YAI[RIAL MFR/PROOUCl/FINISH DESCRIPTION MATERIAL MFR/PRODUCT/FWISN DESCRIPTION MATERIAL MFR/PRODUCT/FINISH O Y1r nm mm rrse martlr mas 4P rlllawlr rmmaaa Nor un srrnl ®!00s ae\1trrN ® mrlpan uaR m vr'rrirr�somriv or�r rA�i.:.r ® mm rm�Nn� um mm wo ms rel-mw�m ® Ir wo\o Sara Nscam sr.W pO1rm°pO°iria�i.mmmimn ® m�1� rm mNl�im°m.¢� rL':-Y,•F:, �rrm a®mol Mao a maw ® n, wo 611-Y OO (rre1N C� tl®mol alOr �N,�fm� ® r[a ala Prrrp mr14/MTI BB Yri O101r ® rrn(TIB\ Ills Orn mO mrm\rOm\r�[o�Irr� ®rre�eM� © Y B O�iIOeN 1� ® am[\rolslllq mrrr/VIII m1��f�tl-B ® �l LL40ilmY N�\W OO[� _ O am I1a\\Y 1rrl[na[usr wm omUa lu NNmI ® BIO mrlal/Mn orb rrY�w�a-B ® 4@r1r1o0 - IiR r tN�B a 01[1 mNW 00 � mu101d v..lf@rFBrol Nr�elr ® wsm �[mY[ �-d�Wn ml-tlltrlre ® Ir M¢en aR m�111 BrYrM ® ® 4oB eoAf \eN®111ml0im arp0[[ [error-lonrm-Or ® rtlam V4b lOm ro-Otr r[Y Pm®Topa W mars- ® u[w-leo[m aeN-fe[[ml_ m B\IN ® marl m'N°msN�y NIiRn ® nArl Pa®®rawmmmlmxea\mamaimr��am°�r[al°� ® we mmlwwlrBYau.0 mnro-la.m.B a a-rr[el[ar ® err OMC g pm1��[m IOmr\of N Nml I®NM r1 m r1([rm err MN[ o\r Yo-r011 rm ® BNrP[OA1 rl\M[I al Ir[ r,.... MIC r0o1 f\CIq MYyI�r1/1L�pe1�ep��rr���� ® m1 N1-�mN W W YOCY nI1�Y1 r 4. ® MOOoa faro II1WYrtl WM rMI, Y[RY[CY M1[O\a MOIN ® Mmr rr®aOl �O,rrY,ia��B ® NO Q: IOe f�W1A�rN A-201A WALL TYPE 51.0m 01sciOrron CD/ 3 2T O CREATIVE DO <@> AST 'ASSOCIAI ruaor Q> <S> Mountain Via rjwcummig 11`61" Estates .. ................... <9> nvrcwYL 3E 7 i ENR RESOURCES .................................... .................... r-Ii .......... D, 10 z .0 quit MAEO r- z 61voo REPLACE* SPECIFICATIONS: Z W z ---------------------- _Q it.E-. -n (D 4 Fil L MLNERAL—P LAN OT NES L • wn ulD T,M&t M. cl— WL It 301DW IK_r._ —to! TYPE A7 rO i(IM WL u liiit IILS�H Floor Plans vm' —1 mat'l," _�IffF R PLAN SLA!INTERFACE SLAB KEYNOTES SLAB INERFACE SPECIFIC NOTES i [ G ' -a, ROOF KEYNOTES CD/ (Y3J 1Y21 O 9 2 �uaf°1s s-°1uQ.N4a_ CREATIVE Of 1 m r lr Iro.-uru srr• ,•'r M•-.• sfN ASSOCIAT •r' ••-r rte• rr-r sa'I• ©ln D+:wi.0 awse>.nreaare ••-r la-r vs• �.snaDln . ' O a.ws,m�D. r.•aa ��n s-n• rr n r rr ©� � ....... ......... .............. D Qi rr er,a./mrQ,n a q.®D,a . .... . .... ... .. , 6. — —— — — -= ROOF NOTEsia>a,Mrae rw a>4M1,>DD, V161 I __ mF3 ___ 'TZ__ ___ __ __ _ f.Damr KnwaeDQ KC rDwwri lr. 1°°r N0. Mounts © _ ___ ___ _ __ _ _ a Mror rDKDK Lval a<Im.rm rr..Dw, EStAtBey _....... .._._......._.._.......... .__....... - - SNI.•'aaaCBf n,Dln S,.,K tws. ..© wsaq°"sun,fsa aimnl ioa r•°"4a,il4Qe p � i � � a a wraa vans a vwat• 1 >( I a m Nus swu a,m Lor•sn u 1/INs Aa)_ CII © rUur rm®.N--a-•I -1 O.. {1--1p,I----i1 lNt rnm s:lz .'. ' 1,iY4FI rr Ai •t:,"rI.aKrW•Komn9Nga„.GOW.qr°rOrnKK aiK>LLit fOWiI.CR uwKMrrAnru4CvmM9"orI.Nw anN,.4a',Yiirra OL OMrm'Nfaa®Inrra"aaitMam.nRO6saQs>t�M.mmr0Wn4f;i1Ca0wpYIS+.eaR1MmM°0,DaoIn'MmuY'Y�a iiWC'NSM'abDw fNYW"Nb.Mf�r"xrR�DMamPr.°nwY6 NnimUR>anaoINaaK"sf�aamau{4Nin°.taif».u`(.raI'fn� 6N4.Wstcucl:lLa. "Mwiaifl N da aoa fEN. .iRO // RESOURCES, _ ............................o6.12 --.. --...... 6:12 O I 1 1°OY1a+Qf;aDimWmN.aoum a qi ni1pP o. ° 9 12 6:12 I �, R`1 O 1 Y.Ir'ti'1 O i r 'irk aiaf.`,ounKas vKa wK,/..q�eeamar a,m.N ,,<> 6:12 I I ROOF/ATTIC VENTILATION CALCULATION p'9 o " ' r"lamG'nf 010'Nf nC["r'.`"a�R r.'sawn'tm'r"Ii m�"i D°iC1p1r..r•».u O�i = \ / 14 1 n rp,a�Drwfn"u.w°r,v,amiiwi fuvrmQioM.c 1r rc Of wni W. aH.Lwa rn.M.aam n Meacma rarQv .- o I \ DDA ranuYQ•1 m Qal•Q arsma roar (� 1 / pbr M m,6RU[,YI fl,W M Nplq fWQK1y yr{ ry r-D• - F p r'nuwc saD:c wsam'ou•°�d-s¢raoK M lDul Z ZO C 11 :12 I I //`\ O' 1' O ROOF]VENf6Al10N REQUIRED(21d tbM f f e RW' 1 lyf SI� Ip DIWaa 1r ____ 1•Wb ngurw•Nl aDIMIM ROOF VENT, R.ADON PROVIDED(2nd Roal . ——� — — — g Q!r r-rl ' Kn 41n v ual 111a uDlDr srnll t! I / anmr 14 N 0 - 12s:lz 6__ — 6:1 . _ rrrNIKDl IKptKoai N/Krlr1,a.r1.a.,..Nr/11l,i o —— —— n.KODYO w•NaaQ,aN tr.>,Das sl. f 1 Ir-r - Ir.• —— ——— q,• r-, ROOF I VENTILATION REWRED IIsi lbm obore front polio) r �Inar• ,r-r re• ,a-r IDT tr f Ib.,a s r nor NgONe.a.awm, • I M.y. ,qy Kraael ru aaraQ,aa L. ROOF I'V1'1E'.NTILATION PROVIDED list Roor above trmf potiol fIOt KNf•4 al UOI.lq fa su A rua KNWOI w IaD,aQ In sc.,.n v. ROOF 2 VENTILATION REQUIRED IIsi(bm obwi Tem potfo) e,...•. aro..irN'fa,b.aln°arrrmr K.,ws.l.a.aMaam TYPEAJ nm aawra.ra avrDQ:a1 u' Root Plan 2 1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN ROOF 2 VENTILATION TION PROVIDED I ITT G above rear polio) ravre W wu Y r� ' rl>QD Dns 4 u Tsar Krn.4s,Gfx.tllu - sN rorr.KD,WOI ra•rM•OQ laU L.a l.alr Sr. ROOF VENnI.ATM CALCULATION wu rlmv°Mi ulQaO"si•rt.,sic mnla'm`N.a�A au'0:rwar a � '�'^+Ks• v,b ar,r rorL Nu M ImoaD ma sw:fl Q wnrD n •- ' IDIQI A GrrID>,IaM M b rat n14 KNOrK Onrli .,I�•„ :a+a rolr wed sew NI a amm n Kwml rNra r rl DMD ra LOIN Dlaan4 ver dN>:IN CQarluCnN�,K ElarDr[ODDlatq Lrl KM'frr•TICK nM Dia fl,laa r9NYq INY M 104 .•. ' aPfY1r alar YDrr.mora 4-sn[. •..... ®v�ZM A-102•A: z i9 9 6 e 9 Z I : L 7 7 ] 11 a 7 L ❑ r 6 J CD/- --------------------------- ---_ - --- Cp EATIVE DE. ASSOCIATI Aoiee�FNed Deq i:dwN'�m n9NCA.rrN ;:---" Mountain Vier G T._. Estates to -------------.-. ------ - ---- ------------ -- -- -- - - - - ---- --- 1 r ENR RESOURCES, r> RFGHT E`ENATION(COTTAGE STYLE) 1!1 FRONT ELEVATION(COTTAGE STYLE) z 1 6 I r ou n ------------- - - --- -- K — - - --- ------------ -- -- -- ---- fD ZZ u T ------------ fV - - -- ----- - - -- --- --------- - l4 ii : ._._..... i.!...........:... ..........._ • N .....:........._.... ......... ..:. .... _.:.`. ---- - -=--- ------ — --- _Neem .. ...... .. ._ - -- C - -- -- - '- --_ --------- - ------ -- - - - - - ....... .................... ....... .......... _..-.. ^._ man. .... rYPEAZ mom 5L, _ - - - --------- ---------- - -_ Elevations PEr ra r �1 LEFw VATION(COTTAGESME) Pl REAR ELEVATION(COTTAGESMEJ cw nr,.a,.:e, NNr o V acre v-ry MATERIAL LEGEND DESCRPTIDN MATERIAL MIR/PRODUCT/NNISR DESCRrPEON MATERIAL MFR/PRODUCT/FNSR DESCRAT:ON MATERIAL MFR/PRODUCT/FIW511 "-- YmMl mnrinY�I -er oia cwv eaAdQ. lmemra Nor.aAav mar 99m=mWrN masa. - •. DI PII-910[ ® I,nT ® ni ieMlO ltw ® mm Wa—NN 6,YN www++• O6"Oo7at iesm ld^'ao TIle�IRl-Yas�lNm ® o w-am°'tra� �:��..... pilrZ 0,eL e' m mO11 ML91 0 eli-9d eCe ® CiIIrN W V 0 IrpA9 m it4(e/a rlea O WpT m Ntl OmrrrQ Om Q 0—A14 Nms marN4ru mm:oo"mQi ® Y,QY mw ®NW/rWl ®'Rr'- l�-wYYY' ® mslwaara Qo mm Ws_m.a.rlm q,�w e��AU� OmE mon wasQ mw-em mgr¢ ® �rrQ Peo9 ®mtr/INR vo-eMM w,�ar ® YNn PrbV au acv mb I[oN 4a0mit ar�i m+�i.��e mel Wa-Mmdf ® (mom fClle-eelo$ _ O � W _ O�rG4"rME ® rs rmldrreq eem NY/NMI br_� mA OWemO a9s Wa-CEt• - r_ Yr.-a.Ne MtlOa IGWfre4N-NI ® �a Qe eUM/M mY WO-WmtrO ® Om rllY:le - aeW pm N/No o mwua ® and ry-oia ol1OA1 ® warQr maemQ lrWuc��Inn mr-cecwo ® rY emaNs om.auaw O Om Cm 4sllr VA 0 tD0i1e a yY MIQYI �� NY Q We�R emeaW�r- ® omeem mssmr le4lNeNl-mmr-nm urea-urs.m ® eeA>d ND ■meY aoe®�� Q am es �mm�.Qrmu�a e4 Nlaln ® �sA ra Nm®rmraQsom arormaaarr'om.R eu�. � m��si�aa sW� ® Mm mm 0Y4 A,IrN 1N WY YemI M[I�MC(~YYYOCC 04 NepYl ® QWpti QD Tellm®Clq nree mm Yr-WAY ® p®lel[OIrIR•OII OO rR IIe,�4eOi • l ® Nm W V1 TCtrq AYYY sd 09e1 aA0t0 ra�lAeW�e Ymlrt a EY N 1 m�it Cel w-}9 QN NL/Clle trM lE Qm Wr ® Hmn mrl yrY:�YYv� ® NOi O+ Ym my mll lOp9 A-201.A; WALL TYPE C D/ ��[/ [�J Homo! t>EscAvlloN Y '2 O a.[ar> i.m nry,� GA EA 7IVE DE © u�o1id'�iiwT'.a.'�r + ASSOGIAT QY O ® '6? Ym `IFvrm Rowan .�� .-, .. a.r RadY w.'&Sr F°hd'C»�d°'Y[ r•mc� Q A `� q:tlrrrrGr ............. ................ ® rrxa.rmrnma[v.r[nac am[xry Drp4tl .......' .. .. ._ .. .. Q ' •d.[-Yacla Alm nrvuW f r. I y y .}A.n:ctr�r.rr,.l rcor>asrn'rol. MOuMe Wel ® :rvrnll.•m 4Y ora t rc m.m Afet .: ..._..._...... �� v.vrnWm e5 i .._....._._.............::--:_:.__........ 'O naoctlur+ w• ME oarYrml E cmatn attar rrw..... e � t-r r-r * 1 r.tl m ® m[roma it rra rano rsw.blr.uru b j j .ar 01 - ml wall C9FrYWl(i(�� l 4 - j --................ - Wwa xrrraurVrrtlss � y i rrm: i _ ENR_ 't tl"r' b - I mnax[r"tlla.a.:oA an`twO°'x••c RESOURCES, : .. tr ._.__—=.:.�..i� i....;1 � rmoo�a.am oi.°YOta •rw ac°on cm�[ b y tlma °a�irim"�s°niiarm+poi�a '. _ m mn awrnc waw+.m.o r .. ... ... _.................. . .....-, mn:ewoi• _ _ � 4 rAAm rm:tAu �aom w :�......:-:........... uu u[s..r lum aao a car l . ... 0+ ' y QB w.a[imwr r!c+m ms ro Lc 0.,...::,. �.•. t S ..::_:_ i oa..❑ :ms"'o`mA[rorur[ �a.a. 0 V -nr y nr 1101 ow�❑ 'W$iri.frail$�r rn 4j 0 m„o • • :-'_f_-i' 1 x-tl vaioro.aw t,�C 00 y [[[Hua © arr y► HREPIACE SPECIFICATIONS' Zo ~......._.i ` vc e.[n-.:on wuo-mos.o mm w V � r i rAn.u[r tr m.<.rrxD.r.wsrxa O b ° �a M r 10.ivv D['A f.w va ao mri°rn�iocrarc `iro�r.a[ow[ T mYai. o..........._.......,.. wra _............................. Q 5 W O .. .. .. ............ ..._.._M .. .O GENERAL PIAN NOTES ..:....... ...u�rarv`�wwu[[04r.'E36�i r�[dr"s{cr0°"..c ap0°"mr. ��u cs ra- .r-r [.rl w.D[rnYa oDYbr lD r xoua.�or..V•• I � � �p i •'�w n�riMR'airi°R u[iui no9aw. 'r �[a�-ri+'� •41 [[xWW[aM[Y[4 a ppYrr IxIF aparf MGa( afA0BD1•q Lan xO raTOY aprprgN[�Irv[DOM. . a� iratln iDi or on lmi ra.�i.c"r�a. [.blgll[r nWl wltlF./Aaax Yw1/KIYIIOI f:xl yy [fr/xxAyyll(M� r[qR raMp w(gmr WWY M tl[M ORYrII r•Am•�Di[Y9�rxll RiH�6 iK rai t[la lrtwal[tlmx Gcrarorr sAl r w:Nx[.rtl N.c•rra.ao!u Ne.n Nn r:Dn[ixw r,,,r r„. roar.sac iN no[a�ca.c[�•lraDar. ral Anw rar rwr s sruu s [o I lYPEBE ra rbraaa•rrrrinr a ra wonln. FIRST FLOOR PLAN rLLAB INTERFACE [.come �Y� v,rr a,nsWw[arWY pry plana P :ere.... sur r....r rouriD.itl[o wtlm.rr wnm rb:x[mr rrm [rrnrrr:ra manna rawNtls a m.tlriior a naw[rtYaro tuv.•ubrc[u u man[Y amara nnsrxw•rxmnga m�inbx.[ia a roan � m�r�AvrA,n�u�[DraiD aatnrtY[rs mr[tonna SLAB KEYNOTES ' pm:ccn w•D.-roN..l v-.0 rmr ....,.. ©xa ar cwcaa ru.r_ rr v:rr rmr - ❑e[aryl[ _ N•./r N.ro. �^_ Tri a[.un rr uum[Nm rm camel `+�"' © r Nb rv[A WD.a r/x Quo rArl am ®a7ir.w. xo[i q[vin r.rr tla bax:r Non Avliw SLAB INEREACE SPECIFIC NOTES j .m-aas:[nr.vxra[m a.ououa.nr[cnaa ro • r �Doaa�.a�ric`wiNaa rrw°a`°ly ui i �malty�K Oi.:.Q wr�.rY:Maas N :rrxrc loamwr n tl r utl[a.rn m oa a'•••r'• Nt Fas r.Dw ora raa[+ucn o rrc.rc[mrr.Ym [W r M1it� r OlYmr•'tlY OHM WOa an.r r..!•a.rua[wa Ar70 Ax � I ROOF KEYNOTES CD/ ASSOCIAT W co .......... ............... .. .......... G 4:12 4:12 p L ROOF NOTES: 12 4:12 Mountain Wei RMW G Estates tl4:12 4:12 c OD ENR 0 0. RESOURCES, a IK His iowiiwDaima 1. 4:12 C:3 ........... _7 4:121 4:f\11 V 4:12 14 z ROOF/ATTIC VENTILATION CALCULATION 0 R.F3 D 11 4t- I.E 41. f-oo czn .4:12 0 ROOF 3 VENTILATION REQUIRED)2nd Mol 3 4:12 s .fnJ, ROOF 3 VENTILATION PROVM pla noorI -n 4:12 W 0. . ............ W-I A 40"W 1 ... ... ............. Y-Y 3-V If.P 4= ROOF I VENTILATION REQUIRED I I if flow above garage) raw.nc:E1 51 ROOF I VENTILATION PROVIDED(10 now above garage) ROOF PLAN ROOF2VEN➢LAIION REQUIRED I I if flow above raw polio) TYPE BI TI Roof Man (D _L%C�O��I:LOOR PLAN s" ROOF 2VENMAIIONPROVIDED(10 Moor above,ear polio) E IDrw ZMU1111 ROOF VINTICCLZ. wo 2.W_ 11 (cm mm T V, A-102.B'. Ill. TIP. TIP. TIP. / r T/ I s • e 1 is a T s Is e 1 1 . a u u e I° ■lti/�L CREATIVE VE ASSOCIAT Amer•,.ermr0-V ---- — -- — — — — — --- -- -- torw.aar _------ — wx.ov �.o•Wim — -- --' .try ... ik. rlryY !�P;t.. rwa•l.Yrte 1'1i'!K1, t�slenP �l!'1�'ii V4Yl.l!'ti'ri f( 4ai'.' YYY 'VI'N.NN�Fi: N u!.' r .Y''NH:. r 41e.•yawv D..w..w YFYr j yf:rVY i:Y.Yh'itir?F! :,ir' IJI :Fir f%Nv i.w'r'•,, ` ri v �N -Ell ' © o Mountain Wel vi.i. V' eiv i Estates vi•i. 4 .1 ...... ........ ............. ....... tar orw -- — ..... _-- --- .... ....... rt ..... ............................ .... .. ... ... _...to¢tus_.... . .... .... Ski r it ............ �:i,. � :_;!�'.•):�'iy:�- li �li� ilI � ill. • I: ENR RESOURCES, - RE ES, mom 11111m I r1 Rµ1GMT ELEVATION(SPANISH SME/ (CRONY ELEVADON/SPANISH STYLE, Ill TTP. I1P. TIP. a{ O_OV --- tMIXatar — — -- —_ ' II,Mily \M..... I v'IK Ir N11..�.! yy) Y. .I YYKYr ... .• 3, vY .. Y IttY i VNYfI:.Y w aim W N �,G Y , ..vVl1YTr'•':ll virL .. � • � . .... ....... .... ' ............. . ............... .... ...................... .. ........ i oas m 1 I ....... : rn.n. TYPE 67 —— —— —————— —————— — — —— _ EMvallona p••Il1D n LEFT ELEVATION(SPANISH STYLE)_ u ELEVATION(SPANISH SYTLEI xva.w..w u.e,n..r t.•r •...m..rrr MATERIAL LEGEND DESCRIPTION YAIERIAL UFR r PRODUCT:FINISH DESCRIPTION RATERM HER/PRODUCT/FINISH DESCRIPTION rATERK UFR/PRODUCT/FINISH I r�.atw� ¢m m¢n ttuv ¢n r1G;�0111nwm ® ci.¢mlPm ar•m¢tm NtR•m se•rl �mm-W rn¢v ® mrMrl i4 m ¢wra-wig err nm tnto atm no® tm a+at-ani m.r ® a•merm 1®•¢¢taaryo4aM vl'•rl tlw oma mine ® mrF®Inp m mal ttml-ere r•N 0r_�. 0 ¢atow ea ¢arl-aorom lortwra-a•Gt10t n maq-ra rota �.�y`+. 0 wA9i® Gane alolr a•sa. and�¢rrm ® a•Ar•cml merej— Ml—.E— ® mrlrlrlcl 0 molt. Ynl-Yr¢•Y ARm .i�w ULO mBrI.l6aa -a..® ® re raU lwea m¢r/.� Y_anrtr0 ® ortnrl..s0 raa o•rl trr a•n ra•-•,rt mmr 0,a�w. O cwe.u�O° mw=amaw¢ e1rIrY1 ¢.¢-n®..GI. ®� ® r of r�wr mora ra¢a ® ((aura lmatq mar/r.n ma�.aaW¢� ® °mt� raaorua•o �-ma m°� ®`��'�� re arrraoau aA¢c Mrm�lm nal••mrarr ® rte mar/taw ooze mrwmo� ® ¢m r.lan mNol aoa:�r.ie . ® ¢w saWPO mr ��r�a.[omart Yttr�i ® aaaelm mramY fa[•oai_t¢n rm-a•® ® qa.¢m raa Qrwaxa¢ ' 0 ¢nr m l•trrr¢Ver ® aa¢�mron•e�lmin ® ¢rrn m 000ca m a[ GW tray-ton mo-n r ® err tam U.tl as aon ra-aw ori - ¢oo-tlaa Gm O aam � .. ��obm.t•.v reran ® ma.xr rromr¢womawmroa.¢¢�a�omaiaa�i � ® � ®a.k worn wt.o ® mm¢aapp��•pp� eorrMINK a...a u. ® Mmm Aral 1.1rYrtx W¢Y.r MR.11[.al l.fmpl�arlalr r ® �� I.r®tOl �wr;W¢rY ® raa Yl 0 ¢ate-WO�•n A-201.8• 3 O2 s WALL TYPE �/ O Ot sswa °esccrnon 4'�J PH.]llei.DWr /.II • ® ®eq}u;L_= Kec �nrY CREATIVE I ASS OCIAT r ---— —— —1 '✓a[ari"q"L'S'o.o Ar— m�i.es�iLULm r ----- ---- 1 _��y aarWsw I I -......i _ ...... .................. ...0 ® Ya.eamaDl r.eaol aw'«er D...a.q. � 1:ilm uiwim a1de�{� �eD eY 4l I I W I I ® '�'LnJSi'°iun"+"'�":9uLIYiQ•Dq _L I ar sue.mme wY; I 'f' © .� I © yOw®vDla��:f�m 9 ro1'l nrDY _. _ ..._..... _............. C ® �erec ea orD•D�it i0ia O I ._.........._..._...._....................... as a¢ Mountain Via <6> 9`;-1 Estates ® nuwm nKl 1 _ _ b _ _"m• Lemi 41s SDM b�V W gY4e[w.n rr' .f tf 1 .. . <6Maa raa rge.v bw9ogepavra I ................... ,� i o L[1.6ENR ESOURCES m DD o[acmDaa ®aa.................... • ce7 I = 1 ..:�... .._.... a�[®'aws�um[n.am ei cr ......... ! m�N9uD01a win uiO YrK 4m'il . °lm i'1�►r'I Y�il au"'ia.Yi ml rnL z� © 1.. Y D a �- 's` Mxs oi�r.a a P 4 [ ., n:mn-wM 4Koa-MasaD.nR m. 1—U O O Z(D FIREPLACE SPECIFICATIONS: 2193 O i � W 19 ......__�... £ qL K¢YKR.R MltleLllO rG r4•rreavq,vPgl _I . � I ' Y R.rwKluw-fY laYKl rogl O MCI b —— .. .. ...............l.`l........ � oDYa♦EL: � D /w felrKgcp[rn,la SMM M SRC rM[aa.M ro«r :......... T •� :... �.r A 4 <. nDT I¢len WD.L[rwa•tD rb rano WM nwlLr. .'. w ma. —————————— -� A W w GENERAL PLAN NOTES . I a[ iop Y lmllaw[lY[I[Jlae' (I, CD - nr rl atle [��'", Lrm Dans rD er sao cDR l a/.•noa. •�.oeoir i0P son.a DDuea[rMm Dans DDaw ' • aon qm Banal ar.rcros 000D. ��q��[.��non tarp.DDDYS aD H SarO r09[ naaLaV OGDNLI it fOv iYp WnDY[W Wt1 pyll le awls KYR w urnw wINIKma'q IKl W !,l FIRST FLOOR PLAN [R�trelauS:�e r sawn[rtli ni.YY...caw ....:r..e (Z YINTERFACE °DRrDnr KYDI�wLrsYw swlL x t•v IK •r, tarDer:ts rur uarrar wlr aarsa swrl a a0.ra��•rm trM•r.mILD su KLM Mr rani twr D:a•.e r,r aw`"�cnw a�igsi¢ci.�Ri�xrfiAs Iwai eiae"dalar`�'ro :. e.4wu•rgxrw a nY wLm+[cr. TYPE B7 :mDKrn ra wmml IK •r wac[ws r�Dma Yr.n[Dm s..�.w:L[hR.•an•rn.DD Floor Plans mr rtrYD,Lwa agolD.qm 9.Dm w.m am[e•qD LlDucon elaN[LrMi lleLrk k N/ COI1XKIn 10 mDef[LIWYD aAV Y4L9R5 a ql rL'v�luel YL C[lrY6 npfy 1r11a11pYU1 WaYcl0iMl0/mLL MrwrMm ql WL mla aawur[rR rae mrRDN6 16WYD lalGl lgr•Daa11 .a•omr�t.r� q r9 SLAB KEYNOTE - . ❑.MLmI cw,.v.. van•..l .. ... �co.c ml.Yr Ilaa w v nn tra • ©"'le'IrDralaa rq.r•.. w I/a'n•roar •..�. ©WE as w:.�aniauio"`.unnl.0 iao'arci""O a rm TJX o 1191D wr—I larnu'or:"lyaa n�ml:n. ®�'r SLAB INERFACE SPECIFIC NOTES nw.mc ua.n...o ram. .vccYuq m �mvblor DIYw rY�w KrraD[ra tqn ..c�gYm'�Yq.o:.vq sa RDLDLrYM rG M sag s IruL91"iwr..im Do-i.•`Y.aG Iwmrs W I——n w m . ' . rir iiauiD n wa u"�'aart a oqr.to coum.DD o-rD mnir.e[Yiurua u uiltio Dons v..0 t A-101•B2 t f Y aWDW ueY. 3 2 N'.; Y ROOF KEYNOTES �/ 1-f. /'-iY ir-o' �G—n/mw.11nalann-urua.a-ural wr CREATIVE 01 ASSOCIAI -/ r-i.' .-io' s-!' II•-r• �urc.oa HNr .snLyr.a ertro.f w.1 .aI -r Ir-r Qi lrt Kn G'.nY•nr.w i o u i tl rNa m Q.�rrrern, ........_�. I I !� .Io oa.Ielan ua 1 f1 IJ F p al—Iola 12 6 1� 111 ,T I rws• rKleuer.e.r NUN.nmola � 6: .1_ _ __ _ ROOF NOTES. �Estates V16 _....: ,.,.., r.l—.—— ———-j.1... Qc OC ,wawa ro a Q•re.ws.b mrs rr lm rn / .. i bQ Nn va a ftr.NlO a.r.tlr>c E ..aa rNerc sNu•a arcs•rwc muaur . — ———-o— ° .•••r.a ne cac nI.S.rl.mN sruc eua. r .oars roux� cm eroJ coH..cs a cu.r cocmt nal nc rlLmn r Rrclls' sI.«a I.c tw.co u S.N lIr � 4 I l I.r-.®".Ir+•J �� � � a M rc m�..a.a00°iwv td nrrmnn awQJx Q aarma.unm 6:12 t / ro••lire-°o•J _ r amee a.a.Qu u m.c O 1 I 4 Sr eam a•nam. �` ^ 4 a'Q.f°'.a,rim%b M a rvuwl�v.'°l.fm.�c rar.rrof r �� L mri'a i sty.a�nwlo m sty K.ns h9 Ne a.wale a iw rbn[n. 'L ua®gar IwNs ENR ILQN.t IOMe[0 b faLwnn Nl w.[I.uaNS rr NICOJ. 6:12 fL i ti '.' ;p KrIJ.f ares wr.nQn Ir.r.Qu.o In RESOURCES iI _ N n.lv Q a..n aam fwc r no Qa nwi!.-./ot.N. N i�' ,-r -r ni m��.uorl.am Nrr.mwrs . vn`r..I Q nu anw a I ....... i. _..... ........ ... O —..._O MSIW ar[R 4gn[[ntl S tlnMo .[Mr It ............ § � ............ �'�l"m wn.L .purr swxame.aL rlr[ ro.a¢In o o -rJ a� a msoJnl alLr..� >.r Y Ir iv 1174— ROOF S. P- z d, r"F t 4Yi � Q O0 , R"eOwr.Oaew�F rw/aAT.T�cICeltn•niVQurtuF..VENTILATION swsVENTILATIONaNn swIwruIOen'r�N ta noai CALCULATION araoQmLwNCUR�eaLww CALCULATION.aKOQaruN 6:12 .wm•QiIarulixr"saawrwD.wu.Irernr �.O�O ra.. 6: 2 uN In O U =0 w=_ �. (p b - (I.W.Ir-e I i-, n ROOF 3 VENTILATION REOUIRE'O l2nd Soil V '� _ I Y• � I- I%..u i Iso.ap sirnaa Nxwa.a.couar rxr N.wn..a•atl.ln ar u. ——o—— r- 17-5:T2 O 2nd 1low wl/rw T .:.......... ........... .. � .........._..............._. _..... ..._...__. -- —L,— ...................... ......._.. ^� .... .............._._..................._...:_..:. N Roar 1 12 l faeY wIT .�....__..—__._._—__............'... - I I(1 HMYrA l7 r-f r-o r-0' j�!'Y - f-r' !'-/• a-/' 111•N Nb1•«SI Gal.f4 SI r .box/I«.LSS Sr a ROOF 1 VEMRARON REQUIRED list flop above garogel q v rorr nor.a. xsr. ' SJ SI /Ib.aJS SI.a0I4 HN141p.N•.lauetl 4 roW rWl40r YIG.LOia1R ab ROOF I VENTILATION PROVIDED list floor above garagel lei N.I:W-1 xn Ka � N4K Nrf•`S•Irin.r S. 2 pOOF PLAN F SECOND FLOOR PLAN IoW NNI41r M4..aNQO.x LI,..b u. �--- — nu« .�. ROOF 2 VENTILATION REQUIRED Ilse Iba above sea Papal a !n uni Im-I i sru. r Knwfr.a.K—E.1 TYPE 132 row Nowa w awao:I.«rr. 'Root Plan ROOF 2 VENTILATION PROVIDED I III flop above rear paliol N.rAa ra Yn vair... S. / y 1.ai.Q]SSr�•Ir 4 IOW N«Mar NIU.mrar.}—� t0.r..�I[I.r:Jr ROOF VENTILATION CALCULATION '• a�'•N'• ae tr.C.N•rrOi rM[1N Qr..fell..tlr r'til slvu rwa wa.n.nt N.mla/uoI.rr•Nw,w w wIl°w.Qa a m.niaionai a a°3°rai ui�nur�ac oHswnla : .a.a rorr.a.awJ r,a rano/a.etyma I.w.c ••..�. rnr rxs�°rara�alrio.�"`ni craw goxmNr��s.�rs ' KQM I..l WK.a11.K au1a. lQY ......• • Qwt.I/a YL.LY aerr.natla.r-rL 'at1�i ®s�Fgua.. AOr....Ie Q w1O2.B2 Irv. i n a : rry CD/ r9 6 I i 1l 7 0 Ta- i 9 i 6 l6 --------------- ----- CREATIVE DF A330CIAT T.. 'f riV E haul• ' OrIY•rytln ._. ArT 0 p I,•r�r z w ! + Mountain Viet Estates h -- —————— . ..— : ILA,J - _ ........... ....... _....... _ _ aa.- RESOURCES, SLR/GHT`(ENATION(COTTAGE STYLE/ �LRONT ELEVATION(COTTAGESMEJ .... I,P 6 e l9 ! i 1rP. z 7 ! it 6 r9 11 i O lJ c,F z -- ———— . . ---- — -- '+ rdd•,d _ ��ou ---- otD ------ — -- — — — -- — z W 3 z ¢z .: .:_... .. :. .. :.:.::. U � 1 i .._. TI ... .... ......_ :.i ...mQ ........... • +- . 4 4 .. .. ...: ..: t ., 1m d garl .............. .. . .... ... ...... - 4 er.I.r rrl.• --—,.----., --nm n. _ - n.-------- -- -- TYPE 87 ——— - ——— Elevations 1Q•r hlz9a rt LEFT�ELEVATION(COTTAGE SMEI rLREAR ELEVATION(COTTAGE STYLE/ a�a,• MATER/AL LEGEND 1-• DE SCRPIIDR Y4fEPoAE_ MFR/PRODUCT/MISM DCEiiOI®ES�iPTtOR YAIEPoAI MFR/PRODUCT/lm- D(SCRSTIDN YAIERIAL YIR/PRODUCT/fQ!$M Q -1®a Ml fTmf 4P mOO IUT.Q MR M101-[Y QQm V �K •...••' ® QQr.wm.a.Q Owsl m.0®-m0[Q mmr© WR Yp—-m•r01 .•(mma w W a9eal ural wL E.q-mh wN baQ vu r m mli unlalopm r wm wa Q rn-aurin ar vm-•aa am ® rYxa allrEov- vhr/ aw.l�om-sure mlQel 8 � sum Tac wL.1-srrE9E n ® m r Wpsa m ms rmi-ar bo ��w• ns.0 man Mar Qm[�omwwoir ® Lmw nml mm./nhn -vwr ® mr-9r mru 0a.�:. alae•lLl-uQ.r feiY Erj� n'a10•mg1lYfEl mQ LE1-hrOLL - @rPeV ® QC 41�M ®sr.�. © m on w_w mra ® a iE-q(aep m nr/ML m I,Mg1YMl�i q[ ® �r(d�0 IlY arlr OaY ma!Wq-W bM1 O:�.C. v Kmmna.�-cora ® sm[aa/mra� mnr/w[r ms rq-uQrlu am Qwp-oam.[ar rilG'Ls-� ym��'�`[- ens-w[ ® IQrrlal rra am aEb ebmaenr�ua be1L� O meal h1lKY hp a/AI hADY M[Ep1dM�I�aE1�baOn E Eel a faYl ® y[ ®trr/Mai mR Ylb-bq Q[KI _ b ®Wlltl ® maemr�b�pm�rY=oEia�awa�'r ® selm mr[mbl 4u lcar�uwr t♦pl-araYo ® �,Q� ���vam Qbrw O um ma(mlaQ`/p � maw/b�ppm�mKmQAnt it Y[r ® ¢n+a ms[mu wt.m•E-lan mYr-nr mA.[ oQrLLIO Q rmh ® mgaIMA Q[Fy@I[q_Y MIfaYr ® 0®4K Qr MYEIm rQPrEEm QI[m10aA4 laR MEa-h1 O.ir ® K1l N/m1 Ua o aCn-�ml�r �1�1[�� Q lA-0®a[pr ® laQ ®QaK WII faQ heb W mae hYb-hr lerlm ® Mm 0 Roq [p al:h assn N[LiIQE�I[i�Lau[•n[M 1gYr ® ®aK ml m r Ib m Q.o rnoa En Ar�EarQ� ® ®.K N.rl[•lbr MI1R Q alb—w��OYRi ® nmmeh9q hMau•.loe M[rEh[1q lo[�mO Yuri` ® rn w' :EIL®QY matYA-YQiI Qpm-O[gi�gv •...Ia Wn1-aEn ® r>LK ® mRYnl-[lumyf Q s-Eh.u.a A-201.8 WALL TYPE C D/ Pmt>Esurlpr g0,1y1� u' EATIVE DE 5 4 7 5 1 1 ® CR um`�..riir�>�.a:>n rart ASSOCIAT err r-r r,r 'rr � 1{" earirr.laeerprS i/>uuan ' nr r-r Rr 1 !r r-f —rr xOnWFDxprtl6our+iJFpFgO[+ul a1rrYlr .- 4-Y r I-t rr I-f 'u�r fp O.T l.ra pip pxi Eepy,.11 ............ r e ° � I S M+0110F>a11 nNl 4 <9> MMOmrteia'rc e-In'M'Ymw. �•mr�pp 't a ti .. ®oxo ea°r ac or p oosxe1i°1°• [saes I awmiaasr..v. Mountain Via, Estates 4 rro-cear•a I It 4; nwrgwwl . IM A' ® icer�a�Oso.°i'stacrw ap m.a 1 n O 2 I cp vaRam roi nano: edo.ew uxp� x x ! I r.Hr ve rr an'p.x..mp rt Ir M I aE.op[rerG>a G• y I O I p.alemlppawwppYlt a riN M•m n ea,an l .........`. I O ep.oss°spi a`ii oc ENR .... ..... C urma ritws rra.mw RESOURCES, I O Op12rn.W oil p r� ZZ pr /� _ I OI yOtV9 a1�e:O l�p1 w 1 V T�� 11 Ir ` F -d.p02SBtxY.np.eOOa.O >.2 r< IiaY.ifdi I J s di ............. M I.... ......................_........................+ ...... _....... _........... .......... -.._.....____.. ....�8 epi�`fo era• .... t wvn~�o°°Oiii mo r _ r ................ .. ..:.. ..� .pan: 1 4 r°E orry mer: ■rw CrZ ' ppo 4 CPRS wtn°Sd°d9t o 0v o -i- ►- COV RREPLACE SPECIFICATIONS: =z .1. Faep lirel I: O 3 tR rrtci-pn v.m ap ab bs V -y)1 :o- f `�t '` a 11 y p nl u rie`�".wicm°e�-n rit •Mw....m.a /: [ u.rr los Mtwcacl.Mir.la—l'r Swc nt tpwawl b rra n .,.� .. �r I_ _ .sn v•Grxuna rp ar s:wl r r.cminra rn T• ` - V•'`` ; \.( � �'f✓j ------- r O O O I erw uslw waa rwxc i.-.r.ortm iaa IMn[r. ........................: I ... .... .. :::::.:::::::::::::.�:::::__.::::.--:::::.:_:::_....... ...... ` ....... ..... ... PUN GENERAL NOTES ...... .. i..''L`I"n+�[Qpe Does r0!ae[([�pir0.q cpo�i s.e•Ms. .............. _____ � i>iion,)x�A«°ArMY02lJ.r°NP&°12.�"rx[0°�'OPL_ ;•" °+ r _ l.W GMKi nAKi�02/°Cx i0o[ilr`�'N` •� s• ' n r-r a. crus[b GH.a 000rt ro sc seat wrt 2 a/r• -r-ea ! ! ..42 pfnir�rr°ln'�[L�p0.9[fgR[[bRi WDYS GxGMM I � r•r cop•iD eonoe n r.nM aao[ a.ri erten cera.Daps b s fap me[ s'•' . i.`o'x`oExrcro m wnuor orl r�e.ci:ii0o4'"'. s.iairisew:initi n r1°Otlpxer�ww�x rper uTMpw .u•a s I wort rt[i cit i.ner aw vs"rw� op mtxspx sx.0 e[r+nuts cis xea•n i[rtiF nlw oivra[epn oro.srsx sxaa r S M aH•ree9ta SLL Nan Yn Yp[1xW a....[r:,,. FIRST FLOOR PLAN m was•eat sit riop�ne cec aio..i Cams I r wr.u[nw ms[cast xrs swat r ro TYPEC au: r..I sx[eerpm•mxral or np pan[cl. Frog Finis r.canucla ro watt iel eps u Grrr exsS r[aeO iurt:m rrra s..aar °`.o rrrwwnn ne�iac"°a'o's 46 Irrcrn taGW[r rrraara e MaiCM p was i[Wte a>b•saIx6RS p ai r"�1`°Y2 Cip FaW a�011[4a9Yipf21G Mxcr COrnyKM a1®[wie 4pwprrS Ir[s[I[noe eaxl[e rMf IYYYYa. a.n PrOor�M� til msr. mar s....rix: A-101.6 ROOF KEYNOTES OCD/ CREATIVE III ASSOCIAI co . .......... ...............................c-' ... ......................... ROOF NOTES: 4:12 4:12 MOUntain Via 00 00 00 00F-States 0, 1-4 —1 K CD C=) C=) ................ Z............. ............ .. ..... .. .............. .......... ....................... ................. ........... .. ............ .. ........G f:MI.gmg ENR ROOF RESOURCES 4:12 I 0:12 00 .—D w 1. —.1. LEI— A— - .... ............... ...... ........... .Mr .... ....... C=) 4:12 ROOFATTIC VENIILAIION CALCULATION .0 ------------------------ ma= uug Du :0) 00 m 09 0 C9 0 3 4 ROOF I VENIRAIION REQUIRED -n ROOF I VENTILATION PROVIDED ............ .............................................. ........... ...................... 4u (3G &—jq(7�_PLAN WIRE C Ra Man A-103.0 CD/ CREATIVE DE ...................................................... ........ ............................................. ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................... ... ........................................................................ ................................................................................................- calxwa hell We ---- -- ---------- ---------- - p ...... ... ...... III Afountain Vie, KF Estates �II (D .... ..... .......... ......... ....... ..... ................... ................... A trl ---- ------ -------- - ----------------- RESOURCES LEVATION PANISHS7YLE) FRC!!r!LEVATl0JV SPANISHSrYLP Z 00 Z rt z (D ................................................................... ................................. .................................... .......... .......................................................................................... .................................. ............................................................................... ............................................. ........................................................................................ Lu 00 ------------------ ---- --------- ------ :N1 mi-ingi, -wif ir V��W, 'e �-e 7 .................... 51 TYPE ------ ---- ------- ------- Elovadons I-a." IE ELEVATION(SPANISH STYLE) 3 REAR EL rfAl. FVATICIN(SPANISH Sra I Pk� MATERIAL LEGEND DESCRIP110N MATERAL MFR/PMCl/FINSH DESOWTION MATERfAL MFR/PRWLICl/FWSH DISCRIPBON UAIERIAL LIFR/PROOUC FIRSH KMrmmrm W." & ,57 0 40 -a-P-0 m"In 0-0 K-"---- m =av- ala .4 ft O mm - A-201.0 F E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA CQ JUNE 3 201 • 4 - 7.00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER ACTION Roll Call 7:00 PM Regular Members: Richard Fletcher_ Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett_ Donald Granger X ® Alternates: Ray Wimberly_ Frances Howdyshell_ Lou Munoz II. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee,comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00583 - Creative Design Associates - Site A. Approved as plan and architectural review of a 13-unit detached condominium project presented. on 2.17 acres within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (48 dwelling units per acre) for a site located on the west side -8 Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street of - APN: 0202-131-27, 61 and 62. Related files: Tentative Tract Map 17444, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358, and Development District Amendment DRC2005-00523. On October 10,2007,a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for EXHIBIT B 1of3 Item C—F39 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA JUNE 39 2014 Ho UCAMONOA Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. B. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00305-BRAD BULLER FOR B. Continued to the TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER-A review of a proposed change to the DRC meeting of June color scheme/theme of an existing commercial complex of about 17, 2014 at the 69.9 acres within the Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista request of the Community Plan, located at the north side of Foothill Boulevard between applicant Haven Avenue and Spruce Avenue-APNs: 1077-422-10, -11,-17, -60, - 62, -66 through -69, and -79 through -92. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP C. The project was SUBTT18912 - MANNING HOMES - A reviewof a proposed 46-lot recommended for subdivision of a vacant parcel of about 7.16 acres within the Medium (M) approval with noted and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts located between Archibald changes. Avenue and Ramona Avenue at the north side of the Parc Electric Inland Empire Trail-APN: 1076-181-01. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545,Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887,Development Review DRC2013-01083, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, Minor Exception DRC2014-00161. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW D. The project was DRC2013-01083 - MANNING HOMES - A, review of a proposal for recommended for 46 single-family residences in conjunction with a 46-lot subdivision.of approval with noted about 7.16 acres within the Medium(M)and Low Medium(LM)Residential changes. Districts located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail-APN: 1076-181-01. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, and Minor Exception DRC2014-00161. 2 of 3 Item C—F40 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA pponCHO JUNE 39 2014 CUCAMONGA III. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. IV. ADJOURNMENT 8.02 p.m. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m.adjournment time. If items go beyond that time,they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 3 of 3• Item C-F41 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MON :,..•,. I1"ORING ;uU, PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2005-00523, SUBTT17444, DRC2005-00250, AND DRC2005-00522 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the (Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Report) for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure.compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of•approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when.and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 EXHIBIT C Item C-1`42 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2005-00523, SUBTT17444, DRC2005-00250, AND DRC2005-00522 Page 2 3. Appropriate.specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures.The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure,attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the.mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. Item C-1`43 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTT17444 and DRC2005-00250 Applicant: Eric Chen,Creative Design Assoc. Initial Study Prepared by: Tabe van der Zwaaa Date: October 10.2001 Mitigation .. of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non-Compliance Air Quality All construction equipment shall be maintained in good PD C Review of plans A/C 214 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected 3 equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide n evidence that low-emission mobile construction I equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to iany construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: ■ Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans . A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. 1 of 8 Mitigation No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of •• of -• Sanctions for implementing Action • • • • • • - Non-Compliance ■ Pave or.apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans AIC 27 ■ Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A1C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time.. • Schedule:activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans AIC 214 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. ■ Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance, BO C Review of plans A 4 with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. ■ Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hapling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of Year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high windy(i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph)in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403.requirements. n -�„ Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 vP, haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or'other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board.[RWQCB))daily to reduce PMIO emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMQ and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to jeduce PMIO emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans AIC 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensurei: that BO C Review of plans A1C 214 construction-grading plans include a statement thrtwork crews will shut off equipment when not in use. i 2of8 Mitigation .. Implementing Action for Monitoring Fiequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non-Comphance All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating,air conditioning,appliances,and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources Preserve or relocate the following trees: pD B Review of Plans C 2 • Three Jeffrey Pine Trees identified as trees 16, 17, and 18 in report. • One Canary Island Date Palm identified as tree 31 in report. • One Eucalyptus Lemon Scented Gum Identified as tree 32 in report. n a One Coast Live Oak identified as tree 33 in report. a� One hundred percent of the trees to be planted to meet PD B Review of Plans C 2 the City's 40 trees per acre requirement shall be minimum 24-inch box size trees. Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the-assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. ! 3of8 I ' I i i Responsible Monitor in y Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Mitigation Measures No. i • Monitoring • • • /Initi • • • hince Implementing • , • {j Consider establishing provisions to require PD/B0 C Review of report �0 314 incorporation of archaeological sites within 'now developments, using their special qualities ps a theme or focal point. i ■ Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report AID 314 archaeological heritage of the area. i ■ Propose mitigation measures and recommend PD/BO C Review of report A/D 314 1 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on • significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. �. PD C Review of report AID 314 Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory,evaluation,and proposed mitigation of resources within the project :area. Submit one copy of the completed report; with . original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permianent 3 archiving. n p AID 4 PD B Review of report If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures .to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriatg, the program must include, but not be limited tp, the following measures: • 4 Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and PD B Review of report AID equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay,to thd site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. 4of8 I Mitigation .. Implementing Action for Monitoring Fiequency Verification Verification rNon-Compliance ■ Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded,divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. j ■ Prepare,identify,and curate all recovered fossils for PD D Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). ■ Submit summary report to City of Rancho PD D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 M soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction RWQCB)daily to reduce PMIo emissions,in accordance ' I with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought IN. resistant landscaping as soon as possible. . 00 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PMIo construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C . During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from construction the site during such episodes. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RVVQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. i 5of8 i Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to issuance of Grading Permits,the permit applicant BO BIC/D Review of plans AIC 214 shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs)that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in SO B/CID Review of plans AIC 2/4 grading plan,and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-sitq and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the follpwing measures at a minimum: a)Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to!rainy periods experienced in southern California, and p) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur eithpr on- 3 site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected In through a remediation or restoration program within a � specified time frame. i `O During construction,temporary berms such as sandbags SO BIC/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rai9fall or other runoff. During construction,to remove pollutants,street cleaning SO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 will be performed prior to storm events.and after the use of water trucks to control dust inorder to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from�the site. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 i the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by &W Technologies on April 27, 2005, to'reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain systerr'to the maximum extent practical. 6of8 I Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling BO B/CID Review of plans A/C 2/4 i and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticideslheroicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, ingluding monitoring provisions for a minimum of two yearn,shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. Prior to issuance of Building Permits,the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP),including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adoped by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. I Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits,applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with 3 obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General n Construction Storm Water Permit from the State�Vater i. n Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained. (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m.on weekdays,including construction Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. i 7of8 Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Gode Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the apove standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shallibe reduced In intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as PD C During A A' possible in the first phase. construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POIBO C During A 417 hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m.on weekdays,inc4uding construction Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. . Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would 3 exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the n construction site), then the developer shall prepare.a ;, noise mitigation plan denoting any construction ,traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible,the'plan.shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land ues or residential dwellings. Construct a continuous 7-foot high solid wall with no PD C During Plan A 4 openings or.gaps along the entire Archibald Aaenue Check frontage at the 45-foot setback from the curb-fage and wrapping around at the north and south end$ to a distance to be.determined by final acoustical report. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person I Monitoringfroquency Method of Vorifloation Sanctions CDD-Community Development Director or designee I A-With Each New Development A-On=site Inspection 1-Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD-Planning Director or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit I Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4.-Stop work Order BO-Building Official or designee 5•Retain Depositor Bonds PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating ti-Revoke CUP FC-Fire Chief or designee 1:�planning\final\cega\mmchklst-revl2-4-06f inal.doc 8of8 RESOLUTION NO. 15-14 ® A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00583, SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 13 UNIT DETACHED CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON 2.17 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR A SITE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 202- 131-27, 61 AND 62 A. Recitals. 1. Creative Design Associates filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2013-00583 as.described in-the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of February 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. ® NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 11, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street in the Low Medium (LM) Development District; and b. The 2.17-acre site slopes gently to the southeast and contains 45 trees of various species and the remnants of a stone-lined drainage channel; and C. A Phase II Cultural Resource Significance Assessment (Michael Brandman Associates, October 31,2006)submitted for the original project concluded that the project site is not considered eligible for listing as an historic resource or landmark status at either the local or State level; and d. The adjacent mobile home park has an open storm drain which currently surface drains across the site and enters the public storm drain system at the southern boundary of the site, which will be undergrounded as part of the project; and • Item C-1752- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-14 DRC2013-00583 - CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES February 11, 2015 Page 2 e. To the north and west is a mobile home park within the Low Medium (LM) Development District.To the south are single-family residences within the Medium(M)Development District: and, to the east, across Archibald Avenue, is a multi-family project within the Medium (M) Development District; and f. The project was designed to conform to the development standards outlined in the. Optional Development Standards of the Development Code for the Low-Medium Development District. The units have a minimum 15-foot side-to-side setback and exceed the required 30-foot front-to-front setback.The project provides 46 percent of private and common open space area, in excess of the minimum 45 percent open space requirement; and g. The project will be gated and includes sidewalks that provide connections to the common open space areas and to the front entrance and public sidewalk along Archibald Avenue. The project also includes a secondary emergency vehicle access along Archibald Avenue with a manual sliding gate; and h. The common open space amenities include two covered picnic tables with BBQ units, a tot lot and two open play areas. An attached two-car garage is provided with each unit in addition to 11 guest parking spaces, 6 parking spaces over the minimum requirement; and i. The project includes 3 plans—2, two-story models and 1, one-story model. The two-story models will each have two elevation types(Spanish and cottage) and range in size from 1,697 to 2,145 square feet. The single-story model will have one elevation type (Spanish) and is 1,792 square feet; and j. The basic layout and building footprints of the proposed project are similar to the originally approved project.The applicant has reversed the floor plans on a number of units,the pad elevations have been slightly adjusted to comply with current Building Code and WQMP requirements, and the elevations have been updated to reflect current design criteria.The project is compliant with all of the conditions of approval outlined for the related Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17444). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan in that the project site is residentially zoned and is being subdivided for residential purposes. The project site is being developed with 13 detached condominiums with a project density of 6 dwelling - units per acre;within the permitted density range of-4-to 8 units per acre for the Low Medium (LM) zoning designation. b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located in that the proposed residential development is a permitted use within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District and is being developed at the midpoint of the permitted density range. C. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code including project density, setbacks, parking, private and common open space areas and recreation facilities. The project, though, requires the approval of two separate Minor Exceptions for wall height.One Minor Exception is necessary to attenuate vehicle noise from Item C-1`53 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-14 DRC2013-00583 - CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES February 11, 2015 Page 3 Archibald Avenue(DRC2013-00941), and a second Minor Exception is necessary because of grade differences between the private yard areas on the project site and a grade difference between the project site and the adjacent mobile home park; d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity in that the lots will be used for residential development in accord with the Low Medium(LM) Residential District and will provide adequate on-site parking and recreational amenities. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment;(ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the • project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered;or(iv)additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Design Review DRC2013- 00583,that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The general layout and number of units have not changed from the original environmental determination. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a'level of less than significant, as the project layout and design have not changed since the original environmental determination. All applicable mitigation measures in the adopted MND will apply to this project. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the current application. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department • 1) Approval is for the site plan and architectural review of a 13-unit detached condominium development located on the west side of Item C—F54 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-14 DRC2013-00583 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES February 11, 2015 Page 4 Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 202-131-27, 61, and 62. 2) All Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Measures in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist for Tentative Tract.Map SUBTT17444 shall apply to this approval. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this'Commission shall.certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11 th day of February 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item C-1`55 Conditions of Approval ;w"'CHO • CUCAMONGA Community Development Deparbnent Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 3. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD) Standards. 4. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services • Department and the.City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first . A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 5. The developer shall submit a construction access plan.and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval: including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 6. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan 7. All parkways,. open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeownrs' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 8. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as • not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Printed: 1/21/2015 www.C1ty0fRC.us Item C-1`56 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Plannina Department 9. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 10. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 13. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of. all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be .kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 14. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared .by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Seventy Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 15. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-0f--way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 16. A minimum 'of trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: percent - 48-inch box or larger percent - 36-inch box or larger, percent-24-inch box or larger, percent- 15-gallon, and percent-5 gallon. 17. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. - 18. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department www.CityofRC.us Page 2 or 9 Printed:1/21/2015 Item C-1`57 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, ORC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000 • Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 19. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 20. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 21. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. 22. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be • made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 23. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 24. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth . from back of sidewalk. 25. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 26. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 27. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 28. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. Printed:1/21/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 9 Item C-1`58 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000. Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 29. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the .final report. 30. Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 31. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant, shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. B. Engineering Services Department 1. Install traffic signal at intersection of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street/project entry. a. Provide easements as needed for traffic signal equipment and maintenance on private drive aisle. b. Upon completion of the joint use driveway and the traffic signal installation, the existing driveway to the mobile home park shall be closed and reconstructed with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street trees to the satisfaction of the mobile home park and the City Engineer. C. The developer shall receive credit against and reimbursement of costs in excess of the Transportation Development Fee in conformance with City Policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2. Provide two(2)9500 Lumens LED street lights. 3. Verify existing access ramps on Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista for conformance to ADA requirements and to City Std. 102. Otherwise reconstruct access ramps to current City Std. 100-8 and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA Solutions, Inc. or approved equal. www.QtyofRC.us Printed:1/21/2015 - Page 4 of 9 Item C-1`59 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCH IBALD AVE -020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 4. Provide a final drainage report to determine: a. Storm water flows for the fully developed tributary area north of the Archibald/Monte Vista intersection, for both the 25-year and 100-year storm events, with nodes at the proposed inlet facility and all catch basins. b. Include a preliminary water surface profile gradient analysis of the proposed pipe to determine if the drop in the existing pipe under Monte Vista Avenue has a negative impact on the hydraulic grade line of the proposed storm drain pipe. c. Determine the extent of ponding as a result of relocating the pipe inlet headwall and propose alternatives to direct overflows to Archibald Avenue without impacting adjacent properties. d. Confirm that Q100 will remain within the street on Archibald(top of curb). 5. Provide confirmation from Cucamonga Valley Water District that a 1-foot separation between the bottom of a sewer line and the top of a storm drain is acceptable, 6. The following impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of building permit (fees subject to change annually with a scheduled increase May 1, 2015): a. Transportation Fee $ 9,002.00 ® b. General Drainage Fee $ 19,382.001 per net acre c. Beautification Fee $ 0.20/SF d. Park Fees $4,396.00 e. Library Impact Fee $ 576.98 f. Animal Center Impact Fee $ 124.29 g. Police Impact Fee $ 172.00 7. Gated entrance shall be in accordance with the City's "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard. 8. Private storm drains connecting to the public storm drain will need to be shown on the public improvement. plans, but they shall be labeled "private" and their sizing will be reviewed by the Building and Safety Division in plan check. 9. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commissign Resolution No. 07-59 approving Tentative Tract Map 17444 shall apply. 10. Structures within the vicinity of the City's storm drain shall provide deepened footings so as to avoid a surcharge on the storm drain. E. Grading Section Printed:1/21/2015 www.C4ofRC.us Page 5 of 9 Item C—F60 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCH IBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Gradina Section 1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices (including but not limited to the infiltration trenches) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project All costs associated with the structural storm water treatment devices are the responsibility of the land owner. 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans the engineer of record shall provide a definition (including an inset exhibit if necessary) defining the term "Distributed Area". 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit should a conflict occur between the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan and the final Project Landscaping Plans, the project improvements shown on the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan shall govem. 4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a copy of the final project landscaping plan(s) shall be submitted as a reference set of plans with the permitted set of precise grading plans for review and shall be included in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 5. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 6. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be. provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 7. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 8. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new. construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage an shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 10. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, thatplan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. www.City&RC.us Page 6 of 9 Printed:1/21/2015 Item C—F61 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 • Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- E. ROJECT:E. Grading Section 12. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required 'off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 14. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 15. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 16. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way. or adjacent private property. 17. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 0 18. Private streets for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical. street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 19. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 20. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public .parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 21. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 22. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 23. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 24. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided. in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed:1/21/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 9 Item C-1`62 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design.Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 25. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the- grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii)- Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit, iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy. of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 27. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided. for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for_ by CCBR's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CCBR's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. Prior to issuance of a grading permit on the final grading and drainage plan the applicant shall clearly show an emergency overflow drainage path should the proposed storm drain pipe become clogged/plugged with debris. The emergency overflow path shall not flood any residential structures. 30. -The. Preliminary---Water Quality- Management Plan . (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 31. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 32. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number MUD). 33. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of.a Grading Permit. www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 9 Printed:1/21/2015 item C—F63 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000 ® Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 34. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CCBR's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CCBR's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 35. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 36. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 37. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. • 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show a City required dust control sign within 50-feet of the project construction entrance and a second dust control sign shall be placed within 50 feet of the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park entrance. 39. All underground vaults within the proposed construction area on the Chapparal Heights Mobil Home Park which are not traffic rated shall be shown on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans to be replaced with traffic rated vaults prior to the issuance of a grading permit 40. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the engineer of record shall submit with the private domestic water and sewer plans, calculations showing the proposed sewer line placed near and under the proposed storm water quality infiltration trenches will withstand any buoyance issues created from the proximity to the said infiltration trenches. 41. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show the project construction entrance fronting directly on a public street Construction access from the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park shall not be permitted. 42. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit that applicant shall make a good faith effort in writing, and show on the permitte grading and drainge plan, work to be completed on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park including, but not limited to, refinishing the drainage inlet on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park property along with any other construction requirements as shown on the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan dated June 03, 2014. Printed:1/21/2015 wwwZtyofRC.us Page 9 of 9 Item C-F64 RESOLUTION NO. 15-15 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2013-00941,A REQUEST TO ALLOW 7-FOOT HIGH WALLS ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE FOR NOISE ATTENUATION IN CONNECTION WITH DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00583 FOR THE SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW OF A 13-UNIT DETACHED CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON 2.17 ACRES WITHIN 'THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(4-8 DWELLING UNITS PERACRE)FORA SITE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0202-131-27, 61 AND 62 A. Recitals. 1. Creative Design Associates filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2013-00941 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of February 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 11, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and b. The 2.17-acre site is comprised of three parcels and slopes gently to the southeast. The site contains 45 trees of various species and the remnants of a stone lined drainage channel. The adjacent mobile home park has an open storm drain which currently surface drains across the site and enters the public storm drain system at the southern boundary of the site; and C. To the north and west is a mobile home park within. the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To the south are single-family residences within the Medium.(M) Residential District: and, to the east, across Archibald Avenue, is a multi-family project within the Medium (M) Residential District; and Item C=1`65 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-15 DRC2013-00941 -CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES February 11, 2015 Page 2 d. The project complies with all related development criteria of the Low Medium (M) Residential District including project density,building design,setbacks, parking,private and common open space areas, landscape coverage and recreation facilities. The project, though, requires the approval of two separate Minor Exceptions for wall height.This Minor Exception to attenuate vehicle noise from Archibald Avenue; and, a second Minor Exception (DRC2014-00358), for combination walls over the permitted 6-foot height limit. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed increase in wall height along the eastern project boundary is necessary to comply with the General Plan Goal PS-13 to minimize the impacts of excessive noise levels and General Plan Policy PS-13-3 to consider the use of noise barriers or walls to reduce noise levels generated by ground transportation. The increased wall height will reduce the onsite noise levels to be in compliance with City regulations. b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area.The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses in that the project site is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, which permits the development of single and multi-family residences. Additionally, there is a residential development to the north, south and west of the project site and to the east across Archibald Avenue. Noise attenuation walls over the permitted height limit occur throughout the City along major streets.. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The project is located along a major street which increases the onsite noise levels in excess of City regulations. The increased wall height will permit the project to comply with City noise attenuation requirements and provide a pleasing street scene. The proposed wall will be constructed of decorative block and the area between the wall and the public right-of-way will be landscaped to soften the appearance of the wall. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. It is common practice to approve Minor Exceptions for wall height in order to mitigate excessive noise levels for projects adjacent to major streets. The increased wall height will not negatively impact properties in the vicinity as the walls will be required to have a decorative finish and landscaping will soften the appearance of the extra wall height. - --- - - 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with - Item C-1`66 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-15 DRC2013-00941 - CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES February 11, 2015 Page 3 • subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered;or(iv)additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The general layout and number of units have not changed from the original environmental determination. Staff further finds that the project will not have.one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously'analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant, as the project layout and design have not changed since the original environmental determination. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the current application. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs-1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth • below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a Minor Exception to increase the project perimeter wall height along Archibald Avenue and wrapping around Unit 7 from 6 feet to 7 feet for noise attenuation purposes related to the development of a 13-unit detached condominium project located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 202-131-27, 61, and 62. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. -. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Item C-1`67 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-15 DRC2013-0094.1 -CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES February 11, 2015 Page 4 BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary. I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: -Item C-1`68 Conditions of Approval ;Pw-4c,1110 CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 3. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in 'conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD) Standards. 4. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services ® Department and the.City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 5. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 6. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations,' exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan 7. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other. means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 8. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as ® not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Printed:1/21/2015 www.CityofRC.us Item C-1`69 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning.Department 9. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 10. For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located*in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 13. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be .kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 14. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 15. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 16. A minimum of trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project percent - 48-inch box or larger percent - 36-inch box or larger, percent-24-inch box or larger, percent- 15-gallon, and percent-5 gallon. 17. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls.------- 18. ----18. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning .Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department - - wwwZtyofRC.us Pae 2 of 9 Printed:1/21/2015 9 Item C-1`70 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCH IBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING.CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Plannina Deoartment 19. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its .agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 20. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 21. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. 22. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 23. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 24. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 25. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 26. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 27. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 28. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. Printed:1/21/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page J of 9 Item C=F71 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941,DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE 020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. ROJECT.A. Planning Department 29. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final .report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked .for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 30. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit; or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 31. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. B. Enaineerina Services Department 1. Install traffic signal at intersection of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street/project entry. a. Provide easements as needed for traffic signal equipment and maintenance on private drive aisle. b. Upon completion of the joint use driveway and the traffic signal installation, the existing driveway to the mobile home park shall be closed and reconstructed with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street trees to the satisfaction of the mobile home park and the City Engineer. c. The developer shall receive credit against and reimbursement of costs in excess of the Transportation Development Fee in conformance with City Policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2. Provide two(2)9500 Lumens LED street lights. 3. Verify existing access ramps on Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista for conformance to ADA requirements and to City Std. 102. Otherwise reconstruct access ramps to current City Std. 100-8 and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA Solutions, Inc. or approved equal. Printed:1!21/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 9 Item C-1`72 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARC HIBALD AVE -020213161-0000 • Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Enaineering Services Department 4. Provide a final drainage report to determine: a. Storm water flows for the fully developed tributary area north of the Archibald/Monte Vista intersection, for both the 25-year and 100-year storm events, with nodes at the proposed inlet facility and all catch basins. b. Include a preliminary water surface profile gradient analysis of the proposed pipe to determine if the drop in the existing pipe under Monte Vista Avenue has a negative impact on the hydraulic grade line of the proposed storm drain pipe. c. Determine the extent of ponding as a result of relocating the pipe inlet headwall and propose alternatives to direct overflows to Archibald Avenue without impacting adjacent properties. d. Confirm that Q100 will remain within the street on Archibald(top of curb). 5. Provide confirmation from Cucamonga Valley Water District that a 1-foot separation between the bottom of a sewer line and the top of a storm drain is acceptable, 6. The following impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of building permit (fees subject to change annually with a scheduled increase May 1, 2015): a. Transportation Fee $ 9,002.00 • b. General Drainage Fee $ 19,382.00/per net acre c. Beautification Fee $0.20!SF d. Park Fees $4,396.00 e. Library Impact Fee $ 576.98 f. Animal Center Impact Fee $ 124.29 g. Police Impact Fee $ 172.00 7. Gated entrance shall be in accordance with the City's "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard. 8. Private storm drains connecting to the public storm drain will need to be--shown on the public improvement plans, but they shall be labeled "private" and their sizing will be reviewed by the Building and Safety Division in plan check. 9. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 07-59 approving Tentative Tract Map 17444 shall apply. 10. Structures within the vicinity of the City's storm drain shall provide deepened footings so as to avoid a surcharge on the storm drain. • E. Gradinq Section Printed:1/21/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 9 Item C—F73 Project#: ORC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type- Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices (including but not limited to the infiltration trenches) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project All costs associated with the structural storm water treatment devices are the responsibility of the land owner. 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans the engineer of record shall provide a definition (including an inset exhibit if necessary) defining the term. "Distributed Area". 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit should a conflict occur between the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan and the final Project Landscaping Plans, the project improvements shown on the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan shall govern. 4. Prior to issuance of. a grading permit a copy of the final project landscaping plan(s) shall be submitted as a reference set of plans with the permitted set of precise grading plans for review and shall be included in the final project-specific Water Quality'Management Plan. 5. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading - Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 6. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report 7. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 8. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more -- of -combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 10. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit 11. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/21/2015 Page 6 of 9 Item C—F74 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 • Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 12. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and -Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage .easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 14. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 15. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 16. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 17. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 18. Private streets for multifamily developments will include street. plans as part of the Grading and AD Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 19. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code.. 20. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 21. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 22. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 23. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 24. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed:1/21/2015 Www.QtyofRC.us Page 7 of 9 Item C—F75 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARC HIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Gradinct Section 25. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting.. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector, b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii)- Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person. and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP)devices. 27. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CCBR's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. Prior to issuance of a grading permit on the final grading and drainage plan the applicant shall clearly show an emergency overflow drainage path should the proposed storm drain pipe become clogged/plugged with debris. The emergency overflow path shall not flood any residential structures. 30. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)- has. been. deemed_ "Acceptable". Prior _._. .... . to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 31. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of. Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 32. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 33. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. wwwZtyofRC.us Printed:1/21/2015 Page 8 of 9 Item C—F76 . Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 • Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 34. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint- maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CCBR's or deeds and shall be recorded prior .to the issuance a grading permit Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 35. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 36. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 37. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show a City required dust control sign within 50-feet of the project construction entrance and a second dust control sign shall be placed within 50-feet of the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park entrance. 39. All underground vaults within the proposed construction area on the Chapparal Heights Mobil Home Park which are not traffic rated shall be shown on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans to be replaced with traffic rated vaults prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 40. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the engineer of record shall submit with the private domestic water and sewer plans, calculations showing the proposed sewer line placed near and under the proposed storm water quality infiltration trenches will withstand any buoyance issues created from the proximity to the said infiltration trenches. 41. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show the project construction entrance fronting directly on a public street Construction access from the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park shall not be permitted. 42. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit that. applicant shall make a good faith effort in writing, and show on the permitte grading and drainge plan, work to be completed on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park including, but not limited to, refinishing the drainage inlet on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park property along with any other construction requirements as shown on the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan dated June 03, 2014. • Printed:1/21/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 9 Item C-1`77 RESOLUTION NO. 15-16 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00358,A REQUEST FOR UP TO 8-FOOT HIGH WALLS IN THE PRIVATE AREAS SEPARATING UNITS 11/12 AND UNITS 10/13 AND BETWEEN THE PROJECT SITE AND MOBILE HOME PARK TO THE WEST DUE TO A 2-FOOT GRADE DIFFERENCE IN CONJUNCTION WITH DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00583 FOR THE SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW OF A 13 UNIT DETACHED CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON 2.17 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)FOR A SITE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET—APN: 202-131-27, 61 AND 62 A. Recitals. 1. Creative Design Associates filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of February 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 11, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and b. The 2.17 acre site is comprised of three parcels and slopes gently to the southeast. The site contains 45 trees of various species and the remnants of a stone lined drainage channel. The adjacent mobile home park has an open storm drain which currently surface drains across the site and enters the public storm drain system at the southern boundary of the site; and C. To the north and west is a mobile home park within the Low Medium (LM) . Residential District. To the south are single-family residences within the Medium (M) Residential District; and to the east, across Archibald Avenue, is a multi-family project within the Medium (M) • Residential District; and Item C-1`78 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-16 DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 2 d. The project complies with all related development criteria of the Low Medium (M) Residential District including project density,building design,setbacks,parking,private and common open space areas, landscape coverage and recreation facilities. The project, though, requires the approval of two separate Minor Exceptions for wall height. The subject Minor Exception is due to grade differences between the private yards areas on the project site and a grade difference between the project site and the neighboring mobile home park. The second Minor exception (DRC2014-00941)is to attenuate vehicle noise from Archibald Avenue. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or.any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed increase in wall height due to a grade difference between adjacent private yard areas and neighboring project sites is consistent with the residential nature of the Development District in which the site is located.The additional wall height will provide privacy and security between the adjacent yard areas and neighboring project sites. b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses in thatthe project site is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, which permits the development of single and multi-family residences.Additionally,there is residential development to the north,south and west of the project site and to the east across Archibald Avenue. Increased wall heights are common where there is a grade difference between adjacent yard areas and neighboring project sites. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. There is an approximately 2-foot grade difference between adjacent private yards area and neighboring project sites. The additional wall height will allow residents to secure their private yard areas with a minimum 6-foot high wall. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. It is common practice to approve Minor Exceptions for wall height within the residential districts when there is a grade difference between adjacent yard areas and project sites. The additional wall height will only be visible to the residents living directly adjacent to the walls and will not negatively impact-other home owners in the area. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with Item C-1`79 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-16 DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 ® Page 3 subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless:(i)substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered;or(iv)additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds,in connection with the Minor Exception DRC2014- 00358,that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The general layout and number of units have not changed from the original environmental determination. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant, as the project layout and design have not changed since the original environmental determination. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with'the City's consideration of the current application. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a Minor Exception for up to 8-foot high walls in the private areas separating Units 11/12 and Units 10/13 and between the project site and Mobile Home Park to the west related to the development of a 13-unit detached condominium project located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street -APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Item C-1`80 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-16 DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 4 BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed;and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: _Item C-481.. Conditions of Approval ,, • 804010 CUCAMONGA Community Development Departrnent Project#: ORC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. ROJECT.A. Planning Department 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 3. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD)Standards. 4. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the.City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final' Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 5. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 6. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the- approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, ' Master Plan and the Community Plan. 7. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 8. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as ® not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Printed:1/21/2015 wWw.QtyofRC.us Item C—F82 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCH IBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 9. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 10. For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 13. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be .kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 14. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared ' by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director .review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 15. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-0f--way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 16. A minimum of trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project percent - 48-inch box or larger percent - 36-inch box or larger, percent-24-inch box or larger, percent- 15-gallon, and percent-5 gallon. 17. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls_ . 18. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 9 Printed:1/21/2015 Item C-1`83 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 ® Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 19. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents,. officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 20. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 21. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. 22. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 23. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 24. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 25. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g.,, over a curb stop). 26. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 27. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. - 28. The applicant •shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. Printed:1/21/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 9 Item C—F84 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. ROJECT.A. Plannina Department 29. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 30. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting.- Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 31. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide. a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. B. Engineering Services Department 1. Install traffic signal at intersection of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street/project entry. a. Provide easements as needed for traffic signal equipment and maintenance on private drive aisle. b. -Upon completion of the joint use driveway and the traffic signal installation, the existing driveway to the mobile home park shall be closed and reconstructed with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street trees to the satisfaction of the mobile home park and the City Engineer. c. The developer shall - receive credit against and reimbursement of costs in excess of the Transportation Development Fee in conformance with City Policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2. Provide two(2)9500 Lumens LED street lights. 3. Verify existing access ramps on Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista for conformance to ADA requirements and to City Std. 102. Otherwise reconstruct access ramps to current. City Std. 100-B and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA Solutions, Inc. or approved equal. www.CityofRC.us __. Printed:1121/2015 Page 4 of 9 Item C—F85 Project#: ORC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942; DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000 • Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Enaineerina Services Department 4. Provide a final drainage report to determine: a. Storm water flows for the . fully developed tributary area north of the Archibald/Monte Vista intersection, for both the 25-year and 100-year storm events, with nodes at the proposed inlet facility and all catch basins. b. Include a preliminary water surface profile gradient analysis of the proposed pipe to determine if the drop in the existing pipe under Monte Vista Avenue has a negative impact on the hydraulic grade line of the proposed storm drain pipe. c. Determine the extent of ponding as a result of relocating the pipe inlet headwall and propose alternatives to direct overflows to Archibald Avenue without impacting adjacent properties. d. Confirm that 01100 will remain within the street on Archibald (top of curb). 5. Provide confirmation from Cucamonga Valley Water District that a 1-foot separation between the bottom of a sewer line and the top of a storm drain is acceptable, 6. The following impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of building permit (fees subject to change annually with a scheduled increase May 1, 2015): a. Transportation Fee $ 9,002.00 b. General Drainage Fee $ 19,382.00/per net acre c. Beautification Fee $ 0.20/SF d. Park Fees $4,396.00 e. Library Impact Fee $ 576.98 f. Animal Center Impact Fee $ 124.29 g. Police Impact Fee $ 172.00 7. Gated entrance shall be in accordance with the City's "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard. 8. Private storm drains connecting to the public- storm drain will need to be shown on the public - improvement plans, but they shall be labeled "private" and their sizing will be reviewed by the Building and Safety Division in plan check. 9. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 07-59 approving Tentative Tract Map 17444 shall apply. 10. Structures within the vicinity of the. City's storm drain shall provide deepened footings so as to avoid a surcharge on the storm drain. E. Gradinq Section • Printed:1/21/2015 Nww.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 9 Item C—F86 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 .Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices (including but not limited to the infiltration trenches) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project All costs associated with the structural storm water treatment devices are the responsibility of the land owner. 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans the engineer of record shall provide a definition (including an inset exhibit if necessary) defining the term "Distributed Area". 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit should a conflict occur between the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan and the final Project Landscaping Plans, the project improvements shown on the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan shall govern. 4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a copy of the final project landscaping plan(s) shall. be submitted as a reference set of plans with the permitted set of precise grading plans for review and shall be included in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan: 5. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 6. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage- plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report 7. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 8. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and -fill.- The- Grading -and--Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 10. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit 11. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed:1/21/2015 Page 6 of 9 Item C—F87 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 • Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 12. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 14. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 15. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 16. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 17. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. ® 18. Private streets for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 19. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 20. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 21. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 22. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 23. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 24. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed:1121/2015 wWw.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 9 Item C-1`88 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARC HIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 25. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector .to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector, b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit, iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water, quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 27. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit Said CCBR's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. Prior to issuance of a grading permit on the final grading and drainage plan the applicant shall clearly show an emergency overflow drainage path should the proposed storm drain pipe become clogged/plugged with debris. The emergency overflow path shall not flood any residential structures. 30. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management an shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 31. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan' shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 32. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 33. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. www.CityofRC.us Page a of 9 Printed:1/21/2015 Item C-1`89 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 • Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 34. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CCBR's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 35. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 36. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 37. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant.shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. • 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show a City required dust control sign within 50-feet of the project construction entrance and a second dust control sign shall be placed within 50-feet of the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park entrance. 39. All underground vaults within the proposed construction area on the Chapparal Heights Mobil Home Park which are not traffic rated shall be shown on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans to be replaced with traffic rated vaults prior to the issuance of a grading permit 40. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the engineer of record shall submit with the private domestic water and sewer plans, calculations showing the proposed sewer line placed near and under the proposed storm water quality infiltration trenches will withstand any buoyance issues created from the proximity to the said infiltration trenches. 41. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show the project construction entrance fronting directly on a public street Construction access from the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park shall not be permitted. 42. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit that applicant shall make a good faith effort in writing, and show on the permitte grading and drainge plan, work to be completed on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park including, but not limited to, refinishing the drainage inlet on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park property along with any other construction requirements as shown on the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan dated June 03, 2014.. • Printed:1/21/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 9 Item C—F90 RESOLUTION NO. 15-17 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00942, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 45 TREES IN CONNECTION WITH A DESIGN REVIEW(DRC2013-00583) FOR A SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW OF A 13-UNIT DETACHED CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON 2.17. ACRES IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)FORA SITE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET—APN: 202-131-27, 61 AND 62 A. Recitals. 1 Creative Design Associates has filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of February 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 11, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and b. The 2.17 acre site is comprised of three parcels and slopes gently to the southeast. The site contains 45 trees of various_species and the remnants of a stone lined drainage channel. The adjacent mobile home park has an open storm drain which currently surface drains across the site and enters the public storm drain system at the southern boundary of the site; and C. To the north and west is a mobile home park within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To the south are single-family residences within the Medium (M) Development District: and, to the east, across Archibald Avenue, is a multi-family project within the Medium (M) Residential District; and d. A Tree Removal Permit has been submitted for the removal of 45 trees related to ® the design review of a 13-unit detached condominium project(DRC2013-00583).An Arborist Report was completed for Tentative Tract•Map SUBTT17444 (John Gonzalez; May 17, 2005) which Item C—F91 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-17 DRC2013-00942 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 2 reviewed the condition of each tree on the project site.The report concluded that all but 6 trees were in poor condition and should be removed.The report also stated that the 6 trees that were classified as being in fair to good condition should be considered for preservation if they did not conflict with the proposed onsite improvements. The layout of the project prevents preserving these 6 trees healthy trees; and e. The Development Code requires that new developments plant 40 trees per acre,of which 90-percent must be 15-gallon size trees and 10-percent must be 24-inch box size trees.The proposed Landscape Plan includes 92 new trees,5 trees in excess of the minimum requirement,of which 43 percent will be 24-inch box size trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The removal of the trees is necessary due to the condition of the trees related to disease, danger of collapse, proximity to an existing structure, or interference with utility services. The Arborist Report prepared for the project on May 17, 2005 concluded that all but 6 of the trees are in poor condition and should be removed. The required grading and site layout prevent preserving the 6 healthy trees. b. The removal of the trees is necessary in order to construct improvements which will allow economic enjoyment of the property. The trees conflict with the construction of onsite improvements related to the development of the proposed 13-unit multi-family development. C. The removal of the trees will not negatively impact the neighborhood, the established character of the area and properly values.There are a large number of mature trees in the surrounding area.The removal of the onsite trees will have a minimal impact on the surrounding area as the 45 trees slated for removal will be mitigated by the number of trees that will be planted as part of the project. The Development Code requires that new developments plant 40 trees per acre, of which 90-percent must be 15-gallon size trees and 10-percent must be 24-inch box size trees.The Landscape Plan for the project includes 92 new trees, 5 trees in excess of the minimum requirement, of which 43 percent will be 24-inch box size trees. d. The removal of the trees is necessary to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way.There are-four trees to be removed are within the public right-of-way that will replaced by new street trees. e. The trees cannot be preserved through pruning and proper maintenance or relocation.All but 6 of the trees slated for removal have been determined by the Arborist Report to be in poor condition. The 6 healthy trees conflict with the proposed onsite improvements. f. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource in the city.All but 6 of the trees are in poor condition.The trees will be replaced as part of the project with a greater number of trees. g. Removal of the trees ih not restricted by a Specific Plan,Community Plan,condition of approval, or designation as a Historic Landmark. Item C-1`92 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-17 DRC2013-00942 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 • Page 3 h. Every effort has been made to incorporate the trees into the design of the project and the only appropriate alternative is the removal of the trees. The condition of the trees and the proposed site and grading plans prevent maintaining the trees in their present location or from relocating the trees on site. i. The removal of the trees will not have a negative impact on the health, safety, or viability of surrounding trees, nor will it negatively impact the aesthetics or general welfare of the surrounding area. Only 6 of the 45 trees slated for removal have been determined to be healthy.Any negative impact created by the removal of the 6 healthy trees will be mitigated'by the 92 new trees that will be planted as part of the project. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted A Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii)substantial • changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered;or(iv)additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The general layout and number of units have not changed from the original environmental determination. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant, as the project layout and design have not changed since the original environmental determination. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the current application. 5. Based upon the findings,and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Item C—F93 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-17 DRC2013-00942 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 4 Planning Department. 1) Approval is for the removal of 45 trees related to the development of a 13 unit detached condominium project located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150.feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, .State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY:. Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item C-1`94 Conditions of Approval R%N210 CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910.ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 3. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in 'conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD) Standards. 4. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the.City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 5. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 6. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan / 7. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be P 9 permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 8. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as • not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Printed:1/21/2015 www.CityofRC.us Item C-1`95 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Deyartrnent 9. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developgr shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of,any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 10. For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department 12. Landscaping ' and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 13. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be .kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 14. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape. architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits .for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 15. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 16. A minimum of trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: percent - 48-inch box or larger percent - 36-inch box or larger, percent-24-inch box or larger, percent- 15-gallon, and, percent-5 gallon. 17. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. — — - - - -- 18. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the requiredlandscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 9 Printed:1/21/2015 Item C—F96 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000 • Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Plannlng Department 19. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 20. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 21. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. 22. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be • made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 23. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 24. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 25. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 26. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 27. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 28. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. Printed:1/21/2015 wWW.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 9 Item C—F97 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCH IBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. ROJECT.A. Planning Department 29. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 30. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used. by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 31. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. B. Engineering Services Deaartment 1. Install traffic signal at intersection of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street/project entry. a. Provide easements as needed for traffic signal equipment and maintenance on private drive aisle. b. Upon completion of the joint use driveway and the traffic signal installation, the existing driveway to the mobile home park shall be closed and reconstructed with curb, gutter, sidewalk and. street trees to the satisfaction of the mobile home park and the City Engineer. c. The developer shall receive credit against and reimbursement of costs in excess of the Transportation Development Fee in conformance with City Policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2Provide two(2)9500 Lumens LED street lights. 3. Verify existing access ramps on Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista for conformance to ADA requirements and to City Std. 102. Otherwise reconstruct access ramps to current City Std. 100-B and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA Solutions, Inc. or approved equal. i Printed:1/21/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 9 Item.0-1`98 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 4. Provide a final drainage report to determine: a. Storm water flows for the fully developed tributary area north of the Archibald/Monte Vista intersection, for both the 25-year and 100-year storm events, with nodes at the proposed inlet facility and all catch basins. b. Include a preliminary water surface profile gradient analysis of the proposed pipe to determine if the drop in the existing pipe under Monte Vista Avenue has a negative impact on the hydraulic grade line of the proposed storm drain pipe. c. Determine the extent of ponding as a result of relocating the pipe inlet headwall and propose alternatives to direct overflows to Archibald Avenue without impacting adjacent properties. d. Confirm that Q100 will remain within the street on Archibald (top of curb). 5. Provide confirmation from Cucamonga Valley Water District that a 1-foot separation between the bottom of a sewer line and the top of a storm drain is acceptable, 6. The following impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of building permit (fees subject to change annually with a scheduled increase May 1, 2015): a. Transportation Fee $ 9,002.00 • b. General Drainage Fee $ 19,382.00/per net acre c. Beautification Fee $0.20/SF d. Park Fees $4,396.00 e. Library Impact Fee $ 576.98 f. Animal Center Impact Fee $ 124.29 g. Police Impact Fee $ 172.00 7. Gated entrance shall be in accordance with the City's "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard. 8. Private storm drains connecting to the public storm drain will need to be shown on the public improvement plans, but they shall be labeled "private" and their sizing will be reviewed by the Building and Safety Division in plan check. 9. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 07-59 approving Tentative Tract Map 17444 shall apply. 10. Structures within the vicinity of the City's storm drain shall provide deepened footings so as to avoid a surcharge on the storm drain. E. Grading Section Printed:1/21/2015 W W W.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 9 Item C-1`99 Project #: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC 2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARC HIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices. (including but not limited to the infiltration trenches) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the structural storm water treatment devices are the responsibility of the land owner. 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans the engineer of record shall provide a definition (including an inset exhibit if necessary) defining the term "Distributed Area". 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit should a conflict occur between the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan and the final Project Landscaping Plans, the project improvements shown on the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan shall govern. 4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a copy of the final project landscaping plan(s) shall be submitted as a reference set of plans with the permitted set of precise grading plans for review and shall be included in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 5. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan.. 6. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report 7. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 8. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet- - - signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 10. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit 11. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. www.CityofRC.us Page a of 9 Printed:1/21%2015 Item C—F.100 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCH IBALD AVE-020213161-0000 • Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 12. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 14. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a details) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 15. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 16. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 17. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. • 18. Private streets for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 19. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 20. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 21. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 22. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 23. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 24. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed:1121/201S W W W.City0fRC.us Page 7 of 9 Item C—F101 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- E. ROJECT.E. Gradina Section 25. Grading Inspections: a). Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector,. b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii)- Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At. the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 27. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit Said CC8.R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. Prior to issuance of a grading permit on the final grading and drainage plan the applicant shall clearly show an emergency overflow drainage path should the proposed storm drain pipe become clogged/plugged with debris. The emergency overflow path shall not flood any residential structures. 30. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 31. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan* shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 32. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 33. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit www.cityO c.us Page a of 9 Printed:1/2112015 Item C—F102 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, ORC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCH IBALD AVE-020213161-0000 • Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Gradina Section 34. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's- and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 35. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 36. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 37. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show a City req uired dust • control sign within 50-feet of the project construction entrance and a second dust control sign shall be placed within 50-feet of the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park entrance. 39. All underground vaults within the proposed construction area on the Chapparal Heights Mobil Home Park which are not traffic rated shall be shown on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans to be replaced with traffic rated vaults prior to the issuance of a grading permit 40. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the engineer of record shall submit with the private domestic water and sewer plans, calculations showing the proposed sewer line placed near and under the proposed storm water quality infiltration trenches will withstand any buoyance issues created from the proximity to the said infiltration trenches. 41. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show the project construction entrance fronting directly on a public street. Construction access from the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park shall not be permitted. 42. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit that applicant shall make a good faith effort in writing, and show on the permitte grading and drainge plan, work to be completed on the Chapparal Heights ng the drainage inlet on the Chapparal Mobile Home Park including, but not limited to, refinishing Heights Mobile Home Park property along with any other construction requirements as shown on the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan dated June 03, 2014. • Printed:1/21/2015 www.City0fRC.us Page 9 of 9 'Item C-1`103 LSIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RANCHO C;UCAMONGA FEBRUARY 11, 2015 NAME COMPANY ADDRESS/EMAIL REGULAR MEETING WORKSHOP ICHFI W A TL 66 CuCAMONGA S ,ERvICE STATION fi,c gars i - 1 s � i �It# w 4 t ` � Cr • f # a Opp s f : a 4. MEMBERSHIP i ` ° NW t �+ 31 � - APPLICATION ... s ROUTE 66 IECA Inland Empire Join us in preserving, promoting and Serving 0 educating the value of Historic Route 66 of California Date: d ROUTE Individual/Family $25.00: MISSION STATEMENT 66 Outside U.S. $30.00: IECA Business Sponsor $100.00 ♦ To continually promote the ' Member Information: preservation of Historically (Please Print) significant landmarks along Route Name of Business: 66! ♦ To continually promote ' Name: International Tourism along ? . Route 66. at f Address: ' ♦ To continually promote events, �» Cit Businesses and landmarks y' GAF $ , associated with Route 66. _ State: Zip: Phone #: Pacific Electric Bridge-1929 Email: How did you hear about us? I wish my member information to remain confidential. 10808 Foothill Blvd. Ste 160-416 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730a Phone:909-271-1024 Email:info@route66ieca.org www.route66ieca.mg Pacific Electric Bridge-2012 OUR STORY 1 January 2012, Rancho Cucamonga, r R CA, Route 66 IECA (Inland Empire \ California), a 501(c)3 non-profit organization, was established. IYs objective — to promote the preserva "I .r..._' tion of historically significant land- Sweeten Hall marks, to promote international tour- Cucamonga Service Station ism and to promote businesses along Rancho Cucamonga, CA Rancho Cucamonga, CA Route 66. We have come to realize Home of how Route 66 holds a special place in Mother Road Chatter Route 66 IECA Offices the American consciousness. The story of Route 66 is our story. It embodies Route 66 IECA publishes a what makes us a great nation. Our love newsletter, Mother Road Chatter Membership in Route 66 IECA affair with the automobile, together which is included with membership. provides opportunities to meet with the people who have traveled, and The newsletter contains news on people who share a desire to will continue to travel, the "Mother events, the history of Route 66, promote and educate the public on Road" is uniquely ours and Route 66 exposes on businesses along Route the history of the `Mother Road". IECA is working to preserve this 66 and more. Readers are Join us......together we can make history, specifically in the Inland encouraged to share their sure Route 66 is not forgotten. Empire. memories. A NON$C • 66 CHICAGO HIS RIC ILLLLIIN�OOIIIS V S SANTA AIN it XAti ��...AI t ...•