Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2015-04-22-Agenda Packet-PC-HPC
• THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKSHOP OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA THE PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 22, 2015 - 7:00 PM* Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center RAINS ROOM*** 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Wimberly_ Vice Chairman Oaxaca_ • Munoz Howdyshell_ Fletcher II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,making loud noises,or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2015-00155—MARC HOMES, LLC-A request for a Planning Commission Workshop review of a conceptual site plan for a high density, single-family residential development comprised of 39 units on a vacant parcel of about 4.7 acres within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Park(OPK)District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street; APN: 1100-031-01 and -07. PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP APRIL 22, 2015 VCHQ Page 2 C;UIL 0 NiM IV. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee,hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 16,2015,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group..To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." . Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). ® PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP APRIL 22, 2015 j�NCxo Page 3 uCMox Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us • • VicinityMap Historic Preservation and Planning Commiss"ion Workshop APRIL 22, 2015 i ! f C C 'O CL Lj a U _ 4 _ _ � v i i 19�St Base LineXA— Base Line J '� Church Church Foothill o Foothill N go Arnow C m Arrow 8th � w ! C7 6 t c 6th W A 4th _ _ 4th * Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Cham--s 10500 Clylc Center Drh Iters A: DRC2016-00155—MARC HOMES, LLC a STAFF REP®RT PI..\NNIM;DEPART'NIENC J DATE: April 22, 2015 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2015-00155 - MARC HOMES, LLC - A request for a Planning Commission Workshop review of a conceptual site plan for a high density, single-family residential development comprised of 39 units on a vacant parcel of about 4.75 acres within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Park (OPK) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street -APN: 1100-031-01 and - 07. GENERAL: A. Pre-Application Review Process: The Pre-Application Review process is intended to promote quality development and to facilitate the Development Review process. Although Pre-Application Review is not required, it allows an applicant to present schematic designs • to the Planning Commission during the early stages of concept plan preparation, prior to formal application, and to receive broad, general comments and direction from the Planning Commission. The meeting is not a forum for debate, and no formal decision or vote is made. After the meeting, staff prepares minutes of the meeting, which are sent to the applicant. B. Site Description: The project site is irregular in shape and is comprised of two (2) parcels with a combined area of about 207,000 square feet (4.75 acres). The project site is located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street. The north parcel (APN: 1100-031-07), with an area of about 164,200 square feet (3.7 acres), is vacant, while the south parcel (APN: 1100-041-01), with an area of about 43,000 square feet (0.99 acre) is partially developed with two (2) buildings. The project site, because of its shape, has unequal dimensions - about 465 feet and 270 feet (east to west) along the north and south perimeter, respectively, and about 350 feet (north to south) and 600 feet (diagonally) along the west and east perimeter, respectively. To the north, west, and south of the project site are single-family residences. To the east is the 1-15 Freeway. Immediately to the northwest of the project site is the historic Cour House. The Cour House is not a part of this project. The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately 1,265 feet and 1,250 feet, respectively. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Site - Offices (part) and Vacant (part) — Office Professional (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan ® North - Single-Family Residences — Low-Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Single-Family Residence — Office Professional (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan Item A-1 1. PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT DRC2015-00155— MARC HOMES, LLC April 22, 2015 Page 2 East - 1-15 Freeway West - Single-Family Residences — Mixed Use (MU) District, Victoria Planned Community D. General Plan Designations: Site - Office North - Low-Medium Residential South - Office East - Not Applicable West - Mixed Use Proiect Description: The applicant proposes to construct an innovative, compact single-family residential development comprised of thirty-nine (39) houses. The property will be subdivided into 39 lots (and additional lots as necessary for common areas). Three (3) floor plans are proposed with floor areas of 3,375 square feet (Unit Type A), 3,060 square feet (Unit Type B), and 2,289 square feet (Unit Type C). All of the houses will be two-story. The houses will have access to either Etiwanda Avenue or Candlewood Street via alleys. These alleys, at 20 feet in width, will either connect to a private street or connect directly to the public streets. There will be two (2) rectangular landscaped courtyards that will function as a semi-private space. The courtyard near Candlewood Street will be about 147 feet by 55 feet (8,085 square feet in area), while the courtyard near the center of the project site will be about 102 feet by 50 feet (5,100 square feet in area). The front elevations of twenty (20) of the houses will face the public or private streets, while the front elevations of the remainder of the houses will face the courtyard areas. The architecture of the houses will follow a traditional theme and incorporate traditional materials such as wood siding and stone/brick veneer. The form and massing will be varied by movement in the wall and roof planes. Each house will have a prominent front entry. There will be porches and decks at the front elevations (and, in some cases, the side elevations) that are generous in size, and chimneys. Contrary to current practice in conventional subdivisions, the houses will be designed in a manner that results in the two-car garages being detached or located at the rear of the house and, therefore, "de- emphasized" relative to the front of the house. In all cases the garages are accessed via the alleys. Twenty-three (23) additional, dedicated parking stalls will be provided along the private street and the alley along the southeast perimeter of the site. Staff notes to the Planning Commission that the applicant's architect, Stefanos Polyzoides, of Moule & Polyzoides Architects and Urbanists, will be present at the meeting with full-sized colored plans and renderings to further elaborate on the concept and various details of the project. E. Formal Application Submittal Requirements: The following applications/documents (and associated fees)will be required at the time of formal submittal: 1. General Plan Amendment (to amend the land use designation from Office to Medium Residential): $12,140; 2. Specific Plan Amendment (to amend the zoning designation from Office Park (OPK) District to Medium (M) Residential District, and amend/establish development standards for the type of project that is proposed): $4,259; Itpm A-2 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT DRC2015-00155— MARC HOMES, LLC April 22, 2015 Page 3 3. Tentative Tract Map: $14,420; 4. Development Review: $10,649; 5. Conditional Use Permit (for development along Etiwanda Avenue): $3,035; 6. Environmental Assessment, Initial Study- Part 1: $2,715; 7. Tree Removal Permit (only required if the removal of trees is proposed): $787; 8. Sign Permit (for Notice of Filing Signs): $120; 9. Deposit for two (2) Notice of Filing Signs (one per street frontage for supplemental public notification purposes): $613 per sign; and 10. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) (three separate fees): $220. F. Special Studies: Environmental studies, such as an air quality/greenhouse gas impact analysis, a biological resources assessment, a noise study, and a cultural resources report will be required to determine the construction and operational impacts and mitigation measures to address those impacts (if any) of the project. The specific studies that will be required will be identified at a follow-up consultation with the Planning Department. G. Technical Requirements: — The technical requirements from the Engineering Services Department, Building and Safety (Grading) Services Department, and Fire Construction Services are attached. • Respectfully submitted,. tX Candy Burnett Planning Director CB:MS/ge Attachments: Technical Requirements/Engineering Services, Building and Safety (Grading) and Fire Construction Services Full-sized Set of Plans Item A-3 NOTE: This information is provided to assist in the preparation of a development package complete for processing. Additional information or comments may be necessary based upon a more thorough analysis during the Development Review Process. Incompleteness Items Additional information that must be subbmitted prior to finding the application complete and scheduling the project for the next stage in the Development Review Process: A.Planning Department P.1 None at this time. S.Engineering Services Department Betty Miller (909)477-2740 Ext.4021 betty.miller@cityofrc.us EA If this subdivision is intended to be detached single family residences on individual lots with private streets, the private streets shall be designed to public street standards. a. Local streets shall be 36 feet curb-to-curb in 60-foot rights-of-way with property line adjacent sidewalks on both sides and residential drive approaches. Provide curb, gutter, street trees and 5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlights. b. Streets shall terminate in cul-de-sacs. Intersections, including knuckles, shall be perpendicular. The minimum centerline radius is 300 feet. E.2 Candlewood is a Local Residential Street, so intersections shall be at least 200 feet apart The absolute minimum with City Engineer approval is 125 feet, which could allow for alignment with and/or offsets from two existing intersections on the north side of Candlewood(one"T"intersection and one knuckle). • E.3 Etiwanda is a Secondary Arterial, which requires at least 660 feet between intersections. To consider even one intersection, at the southernmost end of this property, the City Engineer would have to agree'to a 460-foot separation from Candlewood and 580 feet from Miller. The unusual shape of the lot might be a justification. E.4 If the subdivision is done as detached condominiums, commercial drive approaches, at least 35 feet wide but no more than 50 feet, can be spaced 300 feet apart on Etiwanda Avenue. Northernmost driveway shall be at least 100 feet south of Candlewood Street, measured from the intersection ECR to the near edge of the driveway. a. If two driveways are proposed, they will need to be at the north and south edges of the property. Developer shall provide access easements in favor of existing properties to the north and south in lieu of additional future driveways on Etiwanda. b. Provide a 50-foot stacking distance from the face of curb to the near edge of parking stalls that are perpendicular to driveway drive aisles,including garages. c. Driveways on residential collector streets should be spaced at least 150 feet apart and/or aligned across the street. E.5 If driveways or private streets are gated, all gated entrances shall conform to our Residential Project Gated Entrance design guide, which provides a tum-around area outside the gate for visitors failing to gain access,without backing into the public street E.6 Etiwanda frontage improvements shall be in accordance with the Etiwanda Specific plan. Refer to Figures 5-23 and 5-26. Provide cobble curb and gutter, property line adjacent sidewalk, street trees and 9500 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlights. E.7 Candlewood and interior (public or private) street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local" standards including curb and gutter, property line adjacent sidewalk, street trees and 5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlights. E.8 Dedicate an additional 10 feet along the Etiwanda Avenue frontage of APN 1100-031-07. Ten feet of excess right-of-way along the Etiwanda Avenue frontage of APN 1100-041-01 can be vacated. • Item A-4 SCREENCHECK LETTER COMMENTS DRC2015-00155- 4/14/2015 Page 3 Incompleteness Items Additional information that must be subbmitted prior to finding the application complete and scheduling the project for the next stage in the Development Review Process: C.Fire Prevention 1 New Construction Unit Moises Eskenazi (909)477-2710 Ext.4209 moises.eskenazj@cityofrc.us F.1 The proposed development must be redesigned in accordance with the RCFPD Standards for FD access. SFR must be accessible from public streets designed per the engineering department's standards or from private streets design in accordance with RCFPD Standard 5-1. Street parking, if not available under the private street design must be provided in the form of additional guest parking. D.Building and Safety Services Department B&S.1 None at this time. E.Grading Section GA None at this time. Technical Issues The following preliminary technical issues are minimum Code requirements, which must be satisfied before the project can be recommended for approval to the Planning Commission. It is recommended that these issues be addressed in the revised plans: A.Planning Deparlment PA None at this time. B.Engineering Services Department Betty Miller (909)477-2740 Ext.4021 betty.miller@cityofrc.us EA Where single family residential developments back onto arterial streets, the area outside the perimeter wall is publicly maintained by a Landscape Maintenance District (LMD). With private streets or multifamily developments, including detached condominiums, a homeowners' association will be responsible for perimeter landscape maintenance as well as interior streets, streetlights, street trees and storm drainage facilities. E.2 This developer will be required to place existing overhead utilities on Etiwanda Avenue underground. Other developments have already undergrounded to south of Candlewood Street, so only three power poles will be left between the south property line of the proposed trail. and the Freeway underpass. Across the street development has already deposited funds for their share of the undergrounding costs, so this developer should be encouraged to complete the final 230 feet to the south along with their own frontage. E.3 This development shall accept surface runoff from the existing "Not A Part' parcel at the southeast comer of Etiwanda and Candlewood. Item A-5 A SCREENCHECK LETTER COMMENTS DRC2015-00155- 4/14/2015 Page 4 Technical Issues The following preliminary technical issues are minimum Code requirements, which must be satisfied before the project can be recommended for approval to the Planning Commission. It is recommended that these issues be addressed in the revised plans: D.Building and Safety Services Deparbnent B&S.1 None at this time. E.Grading Section Matthew Addington (909)477-2710 Ext.4202 mafthew.addington@cityofrc.us GA This project is proposing high density. The proposed site plan shows a two dimensional view. The applicant will be required to submit a set a three-dimensional set of plans considering wet utilities, grading,drainage and storm water quality requirements. Design Issues, Preliminary Conditions of Approval,or Comments The following are Preliminary conditions or design issues that are recommended to be addressed in the revised plans: A.Planning Department • PA None at this time. B.Engineering Services Department Betty Miller (909)477-2740 Ext 4021 betty.miller@cityofrc.us EA To be provided upon submittal of a tentative tract map application. Item A-6 FULL SIZED SET OF PLANS ATTACHED TO DELIVERED AGENDA PACKET Item A-7 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 22, 2015 ® 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL To ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Wimberly— Vice Chairman Oaxaca Munoz_ Howdyshell_ Fletcher rF II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. A!I communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of fee audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RAW= APRIL 22, 2015 Cucn�aoxc�► Page 2 III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Consideration of minutes dated April 8, 2015 7 1F_ IV. PUBLICHEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. B. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00745 — KARISH ARCHITECHTS —A request for site plan and architectural review of a 15,821 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building on a .89 acre project site located within the General Industrial (GI) Zoning District on the southeast comer of Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard-APN:0209-032-57.This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332— In-Fill Development Projects. C. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00914 — JWDA - A review of six (6) single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a previously approved subdivision in the Low(L)Residential District located about 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court-APNs: 0201-182-36,-37, and-38. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391. On November 10, 2010, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391. Per Section 15162, no further environmental review is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. V. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION D. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES E. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS • ® HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Cu�HO APRIL 22, 2015 UMONOA Page 3 VI. ADJOURNMENT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL IMMEDIA TEL Y ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP HELD IN THE RAINS ROOM TO DISCUSS PRE APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2015-00155—MARC HOMES, LLC. 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 16,2015,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. • INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. OAVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 22, 2015 C;tmm i Page 4 documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,533 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. r Y VicinityMap • Historic Preservation and Planning Comm Meeting APRIL 22, 2015 I.T CC , 10 _ . FA 0 c I E o i a I ILL � c � o 19 Sty t Base Line Base Line 1 Church Church Foothill � c = Foothill N w Arrow I E � o Imp c Arrow J mey o 8th 0 $ I IDM. Q: W I rim L. o c 6th w L O A _ _ 4th * Meeting Location: C City Hall/Council Chambers ® 10500 Civic Center Drive Item A: Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated Month 00, 2014 Item B: Design Review DRC2014-00745 Item C: Development Review DRC2013-00914 ,e THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE MINUTES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 8, 2015 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California FIF�-- I. CALL TO OItnEIt Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 PM Roll Call Chairman Wimberly X Vice Chairman Oaxaca X Munoz X Howdyshell X Fletcher X ri- �7 II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. A class of students from Los Osos High School was in attendance. No comments were made. Item A-1 s HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION z AND PLANNING COMMISSION iWINUTFS C�HO APRIL 8, 2015 �N`� Page 2 1. III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Consideration of minutes dated March 25, 2015 Moved by Fletcher, second by Munoz, carried 4-0-1 (Howdyshell abstain) IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS B. PRESENTATION ON THE WORLD GAMES HOST TOWN ACTIVITIES BY FRANCIE PALMER, COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Ms. Palmer gave a PowerPoint presentation(copy on file)highlighting the Special Olympics World Games and the activities of their host towns. Rancho Cucamonga will host a delegation July 21-24�h. Additional information is available on the City's website. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00877 —CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-A proposal to amend the General Plan to provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for hotels and motels (only) in order to allow more flexibility in the size of these types of uses/developments located within the City. Related files: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 and Development Review DRC2014- . 00232. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014- 00879—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-A proposal to amend the Development Code to provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for hotels and motels (only) in order in order to allow more flexibility in the size of these types of uses/developments located within the City. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Review DRC2014-00232. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232 — WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. -A proposal to construct a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet with 105 rooms on a vacant parcel of about 91,000 square feet Itcm A-1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RwHO APRIL 8, 2015 Page 3 (2.08 acres)in the Industrial Park(IP)District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District(ICOD) located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street; APN: 0229-341-11. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879.Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Mike Smith, Associate Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation(copy on file). He said Staff received a letter from CDFW regarding the potential impacts to nesting birds on the property and burrowing owls. An additional mitigation measure%ondition of approval has been added to the resolution of approval for the Development Review to address the concern regarding nesting birds. The second concern regarding burrowing owls was already addressed in the conditions as presented. He noted a letter was also received by the Owners Association of Bixby Business Park in response to the public notifications. The letter indicates an objection to the project because the developer did not give sufficient notice to them regarding their project. Mr. Smith reported that the City Attorney was consulted and it was concluded that this is a civil matter to be handled • between those parties. Peter Bhatka, representing Woodbridge Hospitality, said they are following the required steps. Chairman Wimberly opened the public hearing. John Davis, representing the Bixby Business Park Owners Association, said he only saw a posted sign in the common area recently notifying the public of the proposed project. He said he met with a minor majority of the members of the association and they were not aware of the project either. He said the property owners did not receive a mailing notice either. He said he objects to the project until the CC&Rs are complied with. Chairman Wimberly closed the public hearing. Mr. Bhatka said his understanding of the CC&Rs is that approval from the Association is required prior to construction. He did not believe he had a ''project" until he received the Commission's approval. Steven Flower. Assistant City Attorney said the CC&Rs are a private matter; it is not the City's job or obligation to enforce them. He said the applicant runs the risk if they are in violation of the CC&Rs. Commissioner Munoz said the design is adequate and meets requirements. He said the use is appropriate for the area as there is a need for hotel space. He said it generates jobs • and he is in .support. Item A-3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES �� APRIL 8, 2015 Page 4 Commissioner Howdyshell said the applicant worked hard with staff, and staff did a great job on the General Plan Amendment and the Development Code Amendment. She said the DRC did a good job and another hotel adds accommodations to the area. Commissioner Fletcher said the design is more contemporary than some found in Rancho. He said the applicant worked with staff and toned down the colors. He said it is a good location for the contemporary development. He said the amendments provide needed flexibility. Commissioner Oaxaca said the DRC did examine the architecture and agreed this is a good opportunity for more contemporary design. He asked for clarification regarding the added condition. Mr. Smith noted that a condition regarding a requirement for a nesting bird survey be done and it has been added to the resolution for DRC2014-00232 on page 6 of the resolution. Chairman Wimberly agreed with all the comments. He offered kudos to the applicant for working with staff to modify the appearance of the building design. Moved by Howdyshell, second by Fletcher, carried 5-0 to adopt Resolution 15-25 recommending approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877; Resolution 15-26 recommending approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879; and Resolution 15-27 approving Development Review DRC2014-00232 as amended with the added condition for a pre-construction nesting survey 3 days prior to any disturbance of the project area. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts will also be forwarded to the City Council for adoption. VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HiSTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION F. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES G. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS Commissioner Fletcher asked that when the DRC asks an applicant for a full color board and renderings that reflect changes requested by the DRC, that those items be brought to the Commission meeting so that the entire Commission can see them as well. Item A-4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES C NHO APRIL 8, 2015 Page 5 FF VII. ADJOURNMENT Al 7:45 PM 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 2, 2015, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. ENIf you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. • INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning • Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. Item A-5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RA ceo APRIL 8, 2015 CON` ' Page 6 APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,533 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Item A-6 • STAFF REPORT PIANNINGDEPARTM NT Date: April 22, 2015 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Subject: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00745 — KARISH ARCHITECHTS —A request for site plan and architectural review of a 15,821 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building on a .89 acre project site located within the General Industrial (GI) Zoning District on the southeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard - APN: 0209-032-57. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332—In-Fill Development Projects. RECOMMENDATION: Prior to any action being taken on this entitlement, the Planning Director has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects and the City's CEQA Guidelines. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Design Review • DRC2014-00745 though the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant Land - General Industrial (GI) South - Industrial Building -General Industrial (GI) East - Industrial Building—General Industrial (GI) West - City Maintenance Yard—General Industrial (GI) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial (GI) North - General Industrial (GI) South - General Industrial (GI) East - General Industrial (GI) West - General Industrial (GI) C. Site Characteristics: The .89 acre project site is located on the southeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard. The site is vacant, generally drains from north to south and is approximately 202 feet from east to west and 214 feet from north to south. There is existing industrial development of similar intensity to the east, west and south and a vacant lot to the north. The project includes the extension of Feron Boulevard, which currently dead ends into the • project site, to Hellman Avenue. The Engineering Department is vacating 11 feet of right-of-way along Hellman Avenue due to a change in the street classification of Hellman Avenue from Item B-1 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00745—KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 Page 2 secondary to a collector street. This additional 11 feet has been incorporated into the project site. The applicant will be required to make all street improvement along both Feron Boulevard and Hellman Avenue including utility undergrounding, right-of-way improvement and sidewalks along both streets. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant, Karish Architects, is requesting site plan and architectural review of a 15,821 square foot speculative office/warehouse/manufacturing building; there is no known tenant. The building is oriented with the main entrance and parking lot facing a new extension of Feron Boulevard. The building is divided into.a 2,656 square foot office area and a 13,165 square foot warehouse/manufacturing area. The building has one dock high rollup door along with the one trailer parking space. The architecture has a contemporary appearance that incorporates extensive use of tinted black glazing along with a metal canopy over the front entrance. The glazing used at the front entrance is carried over to the southwest comer of the building, creating visual interest and continuity along the Hellman Avenue right-of-way. Form .lines and narrow rectangular glazing are provided on each elevation, carrying over the architectural theme to all elevations. The perimeter walls and trash enclosure are designed to match the building providing a seamless appearance. The roof parapets are of adequate height to screen the roof top equipment from public view. The project conforms will all development standards of the Development Code and General Plan. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is .39 percent, below the maximum permitted .60 percent FAR. The building setback and average depth of landscaping is 25 feet from Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard, which are both classified local streets and have a required setback and average landscape depth of 25 feet. The building height is 33.83 feet, below the maximum height limit of 35 feet. Landscape coverage is 21.5 percent, in excess of the minimum 10 percent requirement and in conformance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. A five foot landscape planter is provided adjacent to the south and east property lines along with a 432 square foot covered outdoor employee eating area. B. Parking: The project includes 26 standard vehicle parking spaces and 1 trailer parking space as required by the Development Code. The Development Code permits electrical and mechanical rooms, stairwells, bathrooms and storage closets to be deducted from the gross square footage when calculating required parking, which was calculated as follows: Parking Calculation Land Use Square Feet Parking Ratio Required Parking Provided Parkin Office 2,180 1/250 9 9 Manufacturing 5,000. 1/500 10 10 Warehouse 6,601 1/1,000 7 7 Totals 26` 26 Item B-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • DRC2014-00745—KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 Page 3 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE: The project was reviewed and approved as presented by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca and Granger) on March 3, 2015. TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE: The project was reviewed and approved as presented by the Technical Review Committee on March 3, 2015. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a oublic hearing in the Inland Valle DailyBulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff required the applicant to post a large 4-foot by 8-foot Notice of Filing sign on the property, which was also used to post the City's public hearing notice. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, which covers in-fill development that does not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. The project scope is for the development of a 15,821 square foot office/manufacturing/warehouse building on a .89 acre vacant site. Staff finds that the project meets the intent of CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 and that based on the following findings the project will not have a significant effect on the environment: 1. The project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations. The General Plan and zoning designations • for the project site is General Industrial (GI), which permits office/manufacturing/warehouse buildings. 2. The proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than 5 acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The .89 acre project site is within the City limits and is surrounded by urban uses. There is industrial development of similar design and intensity to the east, west and south and vacant industrially zoned land to the north. 3. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. An Initial Biological Analysis (TeraCor Resource Management, November 24, 2014) was performed on the project site which determined that the vacant, graded site contains limited vegetation and has no substantial or important biological resources. The Biological Analysis concluded that the proposed project would not affect any sensitive species and that no further investigation is warranted at this time. Staff contacted the biologist (Jared Reed, TeraCor Resource Management) that drafted the Initial Biological Analysis to discuss the potential for the burrowing owl to habitate the project site. Staff was informed that there were no burrowing owls found on the project site but that there was always the potential for the burrowing owl to habitate the site in the future. Staff has added a Condition of Approval requiring burrowing owl and nesting bird surveys prior to the approval of a grading plan. 4. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. • a. Traffic - The proposed 15,821 square foot industrial building is estimated to produce 15 two- way peak hour trips per day based on the Trip Generation Manual. The City's traffic model Item B-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00745—KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 Page 4 does not consider a project. to have a significant impact on the roadway system until it exceeds 50 two-way peak hour trips; as such, the effect on the environment is not significant. b. Noise - The project approval will include Standard Conditions which regulate the time of day when construction activity may occur. The Development Code includes Performance Standards which regulate noise levels within the General Industrial (GI) Zoning District. All business activities are required to be performed within an enclosed building and the project site is not located adjacent to a residential district; as such, the effect on the environment is not significant. c. Air Quality - An Air Quality and Green House Gas Analysis was prepared for the project (CAJA Environmental Services, LLC, March 2015). Emissions were calculated using the CAIEEMod 2013.2.2 model. The study concluded that the project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for construction emissions, localized emissions or operational emissions. The report also concluded that the project will be consistent with all feasible and applicable strategies recommended by the California Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32) Scoping Plan. As a result, the project's cumulative impact on air quality and climate change is not significant. d. Water Quality—The applicant has submitted a Preliminary Water Quality Management Exhibit (Walden & Associates, December 19, 2014) that complies with the most recent State and local water quality requirements; as such, the effect on the environment is not significant. 5. The site can-be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project will be served by the City's utility and service providers who each have adequate capacity to meet the project's level of service demand. CONCLUSION: The Planning Commission reviewed the Planning Director's determination of exemption, and based on the Planning Commission's independent judgement, concurs with the Planning Director's determination of exemption. Respectfully submitted, r Candyce Burnett Planning Director CB:TV/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Plan Exhibit B - Vicinity Plan Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - Floor Plan Item B-4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00745—KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 Page 5 Exhibit E - Roof Plan Exhibit F - Elevations Exhibit G - Wall Plan Exhibit H - Landscape Plan Exhibit I - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit J - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated March 3, 2015 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2014-00745 • Item B-5 1 , 1 � � 1 � �Fit Iy - l t_.' � • 1 1 } 1 1 ( 1 I EXHIBIT -------------------------------------- IV REA, N Iiii-ILLLU 73 77_1RE_ACCESSSITEPLANI�YNOI S A6 ------------------------------------------ N 131 CW RREFLOWLET m �p 14 11 0. -9-0 �Z Fj ct 131 FROJECFSLMM Y u 4-4" ❑ 0 E3 .......... 13 LI N 1 121 SfTEPCHNKE TES 1 41 LEL DESCRP/ LYR3. i i aooRPLA KEYNO s y 'VVV03 N" r -n.� �L arrvasec N. i. j # �. J ' ii I ■ - ' I it i , a � w i it Mir I N ,2 ' FN25TFLQ'J(t PLAN - -_ _..._ __ j 31 ME AMN FLOpRPLAN _ D 4 m x cuI RoorPLANKEYNOTES TI IF —TLL� I! I131 6N OY AREAMS 141 9NRL0YFEA TREWS 1171 46d -'2': ROGFR 5 SECT THRCUGHOFFICEF� L.A a • • ° v ■■■ 91��• �� 1 l�1rlf ° ■!I■ �411�� �III�• • 13 ° wn • • AM 13 121 i;;�7ELLVATION Eq 131 • ■■ ■■ r � i �.■moi-� ��� .■ !� �`` - �. �: ■_� I �� -_mss �iil■ .. _--: ..v,... � ._ • �■moi . ■r■.p■��� ter.. re ainpu� �1 uecu//ay �� �'Q� � � a � } �" _ r ; „� f: i,-, �u ■> i �- i i i I I i b '. li r' �� �� P„: E:. D� �� f � �,` U ��;:' [? �_. _, ---� , ” it :� o p, _— ❑ ❑ o 1 i ddd r Oo— —'r - ❑ _ fJ 9 sner-r.nrn uevtr,w , 7�.-. i. � b ❑ w 1 -/R 15HO .QSUREPL4N KEYNO7•Es 2 ]R ET OSUJ EL AI +� lift - wroroz mwna`ro+�au 3 srmwALLEI.EYATION-Q YARDENiWWCEWALL 141 WALL ELEVAPO @?EASTFPLYPROPMR LINE Hroro 5 SITE WALL ELEVA1lON-�'EASTEW_YFROPERTYLINE:...,....;:.•....-. _- _ DR/ 1 SITETos s ' SIMWALLELEVAT -Q SOUIMERLYPROPE I LNVE'......,...••., ...•: P T CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT 15 A REDUCED PRINT i • ■ X PLANT LEGEND i _______ ______ emu n,wee wwe � oEc FERON BOULEVARD rm m m oQ I , J z m D' Z O 0 !L: � J W NRa U ❑ Q Lu Z PROPOSED w EXISTING TREE LEGEND Z 2 BUILDING W m m m m_. „.w. 'a 0 Z U <'w. Z O a�, a x U J .S,'' IA� M J Q r + r. -P Ww _ - x <. a Q\ LAI - ` �. ` � ate.OMA LANDSCAPE DESIGN STATEMENT WATER CONSERVATION NOTES o aauaaExv nuwKw oEEA4MS9 py[ A. ram muax,vmrn,re,.fwm[x vnnmv vwnv vxm�n w, �avwvx�rtxum Awl .. T. p; TREE CALCULATIONS VAR uvrsnv,m,aF.seww[v. wav,siu,e nKvavmi o wn,vnw. mnw,vvw -3` -�V£., CM91 R.µvTc08.1 REmrx�. 1R ) � L[aWSRMOH ERRV, R .m.„w„„,w” wrv'• ,. ..wmuw.,u.ou�.u�.urwa.,..uww.ar.,w..u.nr.n. E n,e aasare eox`m` �P LPNDSCAPE SCAPE PIAN aw..xn",n.smcx.mrwnuiwnumxccxEusE �� ,a ,o 40 L1.1 m X CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN WONETTSSITE SR FOR EA wam o uwgp umu yp atm yynomw EAARA a w"m ax M; ° a.w www am .ar� wr INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LEGEND ONMER Qu.N,�w rbaa waw.•�R m�ma a«,r mmr.w xww are 8801 HELLMAN AVENUE � w mm ^°waa7^ M �" w RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA SIMADDRE55 wwa w mrmm QR xo rMlYri¢vM'>.v4Mo6rK rrWnw nwx�nRWM ww MV5.90F [wr�.[ma rwam nrW mxIXx 4911rW w•+Mrr.A antro'.. r[m. wm w,aamR o1Q"n ma�m awu¢aua mora a w ewxuww 9m rm �,m ac BENCI RK' _ a�mwar,s w EXCAVATION AND FILL NOTES T E w mns mm umn axarsmmrra'oaOrs�wrs^'[immx no�rmttr[ gw ma a r4 erWaas mr ro,¢m+r[wwro mmm�.owx.f.lu[vrw.,lrRow>ow a"rwTM'imvrro�Mar n'wrr _ n•r¢w maaxco M,rxv wr¢ur0 rent an�tirwLL�MDID.[urw4 mMG qw r},ww mx�x M'n Oat l,ruMeeWY9.xnr M1or/}9uui eNel aW star OIV. .41Yn z s acwc rxm Im nmq a¢aaxu n.sm tar.an¢rr¢ly x un rm IOsx,1 x 85515 OF BEARINGIN: arm[ao1 M'wme[rsnra nate rw xn yw¢u a,auuw unuamrx.m warn wwumxM saz wn.9roRspaga mmw.c l[a vrwsl vsr ram PM 9ur,�x rRa �`xriln na vm www asnwr mwxm rams mon wearmx aoaa'wiam u pr�m°'"w0.s rmre n nn xw[nn wm rw mn.ws a ra.on nw s aw a wn-w-v w x w . am ww.wlm v '�'� amm su mxn ra mrxssrt,m wrxnrx mrwmns�n cxrruc wuwr as ea mo-re xlrrOi�rmoq not la areae ur srmmrrx rora,u lmlmra anxw ra ru m[m r.w r• LEGAL DESCRIPTION: a�xMaw eaa 9�rm�3 ra9sas RnwsRnurwn w.r'aW,xp�i,.t'�'M ywanra�wau pp,, "��Iwvndvlaa�,yrrp ar¢[.ary rawg aruanuumwmarmrw[w We n[•uw rw rn �,tl'n' ,s mwnu vxs mer xm rw mn rnsw a.wa mi w.xs pu.,r rar aa'ruxxn " m"xr RRry ram w mmm rm[nxr - PRIVATE ENGINEER'S NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS Ram I rs."�"rs s¢ua vwrwwr w[aama.[ow mrcno arm amw mernnmor,a treat¢ ,K�„gwrmrw wxna¢v4>,nu rw w • u �®r�o 9i�t�naR r a •xarxaL aw anm ruu ua ucwws. [n Mmursm6 9'ataraw'p�wP'�1e6 a 5�9 Or�aga w r,MR x�ww;wnw¢ao�m ua w Raiir wnro rc K 4Mau v.w smr naa m"n""anncr rymum, °^ m asm®rm m ne macrm a law w omur orvnaw Nan m"6 w surwnm�wnwxe v aw w w Rune w rex nxa aw mov[r tux marm w mr xt uaw[u UTILITY COMPANIES m arp r mr rue.rar ro w rm w a nax• «.m*+arnwa„m""n„mw ansa mi a"xa`wnn`r¢aiu na aam5 w,w ewer[aw a m.rtr aarr®ro a aRw w "�aa:'9"wR w Rmtnm xt mwmrm m aaawnm aw mar.w n rmwrm,t Wm ��u9va¢ceLanwn....a w.., wxn,.,wm r.w� %.tura au,�ara vi arwercwm,mra aaauuw mwmrrwewrw aum¢'wuwxm Wm w"w0 wwaaww+wa:� rmrom x aTa m on a xsnw Dear•sxwm w eau un ram sleet a r-F vwMmrs � .nun w•m,m nwrw aRav¢t[xwnm M[mnxlws' �pjnaiiwr ill en �,I ejm� 'a rx RuupSa Mrui mnrmw[mrwmxsMRwuamx.mµuepw Ory,m.4ru5"m¢rn[n"W[n -Err-nn �r M®1Rr mwxer 3 m a � m'Maa �:w aaw wa mw ammmxm Rn �amwa wa ° w° aR. mw Q.) :m, raw .4w,w 4M � n. a w ra mu wsbea axon m[a mmmr mrserm UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES AND USES- �R"n'rsm' Pr•l w-m ru yyw Wy oy,rn r,u,rp aa,rw mn w avre n ra¢mro.ru awcwmm M���nyH w���g�nMtO�xnrarrB"•'"'w'ncowsnwr®'o rres[u¢uomtsro oma an«nom �av"m�" avrto.rw num w axve m van awarxwr om rmmm runu.au a rmn[+mar ro a urtnw o rex w rr'awrwo¢rwwrwrrs,�'¢m I ml.n�rarGHEET INDEX BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR INDUSTRIALAND r u RFnvmr wivn.r wrxu owe xn nnwrona xar,mwrvwwss�a Rwwa'.a�¢rm rmn u,ora"r COMMERCIAL FACILITIES' maa�r� ++.in mbvc vw[moa npprr mum wo¢rt¢n w crrm wave rg[nw N ars mm m sun w m. ¢T�xrw'�"Y rrvip p"� �m"a°a^ m m[w.,rx urwr rR[ xv.•r an ro•u roy,rrx w rrxucw 4w^rle4 9lurww �,xr u�YO„�O„m orx �R.u[u �ii�w wrvua� w Rn,w�mxmm mw r:i s`mu am.i an�rm umon"'wrxR"iwxaTwwa r¢x'uur[�rE°xswi�ucrw[a�.r w0.us ® nim°�i w w„mn mrta mu¢rm saws ruomrm n•ram Warr. ,w w rx rmtmu uvnr¢w" r.mmm�s a m m�vwa _ ___ beavw R" m.,a'"^asms wane 1 wwnw Na xwrannx wnm Wtn wrRr:�o:� .w.rx«« �m�n: rave me manvra�w m"'"'wa mo�irom�m rw�wr¢re[rex w�w+,r.nn emi anawnu ra rrx arra xu[Wm arwmur _ �m amu tau w mn rest¢ ,xouwoi�u mR ru xirssnn nor sm ¢mcw wen wramae•m rmmwr�u�Rrwc wnmt w•¢ erre -- atm snuawmrxmry Pram wise nrrmm.mum x.a xutm mmav rex•mnm �- - _ __ «r row[rµwa"�6 `�wawnR OMrm aruaw[xrNN ww arra urtwwM owem WmmWtwo ret va Opnau amnjprx p�Wr.�a�'M�yO¢Wq Msny�,m,w�®Gw[�S4¢W6 wM v1[n5nx �I^ r«IW-e.ue rmn¢w nma awe rut�wvm mns[w w w�aarv[�s xm�lx[)rr 6 ro�ima s�irvr e[ua m aa�ivaunww'i[�.a'rsa uv nue r,mr ra rr wm. m wx'wmaaumrwx�xr�wnw� m[®�xm' e:n ru :a�r.:�s'"ma'vx:m4'aw�°,ow.a�mmrm"•"mm'wi imam n•°""v w.wr %/TwI a.u arw¢ws ww n.x rrar rmn eon[vwxrt asm,rwri m,x[[w[ n+•aamr�iervxxmrs.�u na�er�nswtm'mrm.w�aariu mraa"vrsrn�romiw�ronrw w waRa�¢rowan ur[ss xwu a�iimn Intl m-vn u.ru w.[,vxr xp nra Rae mns o n aom turn«rrs m enn[rm mu n rrwum nrwrnnr n w6¢am u wv wo[ew5,mr axa�,,y'""'®w nR°� [•""a w mn rq.S nm. m•���-aura +� mw9 www"w mars an a wrax¢era w a sR®x ww wm"omm swanw o"'�'amrruww wrxo usxm aana¢mrwe xvamrs ' nouw rw an srvm ,o®r wulvarvnWOoa Rwwow Wwe�wsruwrwwomrsa aexurw ro nrm awe ra rmmm�mw vu v aw'amwtmt r'ama[aa fa¢w awe i xmr'�¢ ma�imca'v •w u wvs ���mmr ru rem,rrorm"uw®arwrt�.wa[vw�e4wnm.r¢rx"m.rty r�Xm e'xvn Ie�Nnn n�s mrRia w r�i[s*we rw r mum o r�wrre�un asmrww'u w mrwu.[rnm. r n awmrs w w arm reap na roavo msn,c ms Inram,ux'•rcu w[unwr�w�M[�IW�rI rOmm s iwr m�isuaa:v�� _ ea m roR a�irw r oswirtu m sum�nis a�vus'rmn'mav rmrrts�iim aw r•,mtawxr�r"�ww on�"wewi,euasa taus ra,. °�� �Ma mmMr sew'aurr xm wa,e,srrr Dunt a4[war a[wr-w onn wr vat EXCAVATION AND FILL NOTES ¢oarsw®ixas q y„aa.vy,w",rpr,s mrrRw ma.auxvwwivs mxi w^uwmt�am a' raww tura q[aRx wwax „m,wyx smrr. mo,w raoum smwmwrmr v taut ware.lm�I m�ircm w rnnrum aw a mum wr�rw'rnio-ws raa a ww vma �s`r v w w«nrr°"wn m a wu n aa..wa wr TITLE SHEET wi mrm�stm�rw uwt waaanrw.ra.f�r'mrrclw mxurrar wwmwnwwurxu n°w ra-sow.rurvmuasm ww smm rnrr♦ naris F. ww,m w m rase -aRua wR.w mmi I�r�+lnw Rn awwuRrs sa w m[n wFeu,':w°aA.nv r w rK m"^�x mrua«^ INDUSTRIAL BUILDING !9 BB0I HELLNAN AVENUE � P.WGq CLYAVCNGLG 8 i � I z w a�.� O _ N BOULEVARD � OARD ui - f — `_=��I `nfJ1 —I . PROPOSED BUILDING 3 ..1 - III A GROSS SIM AREA. Ul 11 i wt •a� y NET SITE ARFA: _� moi• 1v NuRloo�i fps L` I — i Y- I gg m mem O1P PRHIMNARV MTNWDRN 33 �Ar fl`7 vWan '�� 3 F a { C �` \`T\• ( `•-- �` PEayKXWMPPERVXMAREA&: Be1CNNARK: N k g VLEWNQ CONCEPTUAL GRADING AND _ J „ ! swclnT�s DRAINAGE PLAN 'snort`s` WDUSTRIAL BUILDING =w� kms. 8801 NELLNAN AVENUE 2 ooxaa arwuwrnu 5 9 Lu Lu Q � O ', ,I F c ♦ onu u[ IFN<» Z O _ �rw FERON BOULEVARD _ a I 1 ♦ $ G N y� $ Z� PROPOSED BUILD& R 3uj C — �v 5 . 1 GROSS SITE ARErI: PREL NNARY EARTNWORK I. 9 i § NETWEaR ,e uAre PERM SAMPERVKIUS AREAS: NI BENCHMARK. � I ,'9�' � � / � m'�vi�mra..nmo- >w.�r»rr..as�»ra.•..K, LoeCONCEPTUAL GRADING AND ea e 0soanlcs "`Ne. DRAINAGE PLAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 88D8 HELLMAN AVENUE 2 kYN}IONGY]H(.�G 6 ----FE N ZEVARD--- ----------------- FERON BOULEVARD 7"N m NNNi"M ELL— Lu "D Lu z Lu z > w > PROPOSED BUILDING w CD 3 ou 00 KIP' EXISTING CONDITION LEGEND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PROPOSED CONDITION UMP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSINILWYAND FREQUENCY GWISSSITEAREA, CONSTRUCTION NOTES NPGIES WMAX muAWn0. NETSITE ARES: mxAm m AAM B �M�ML� PEWOUSAMPEWOUS AREAs, N o o. —m 1.1FAY PRELIMINARY WATER QUALRYWMAGEYENiA BMP SUBSURFACE INFILTRATION PIT PLANSITE DIUUMULE IN ANUGR N�m INDUSTRIAL BUNGING 8801 HELLMAN AVENUE 3 �1 W z WW W Q 1 ___ NO• -------- u „f i u Xluaf( i ,f a um Z u xWp• ,.aA .-... FERON BOULEVARD LuLu Z �! I' (D 3 J CO W II § i— - , IYPIfNLLSYlFO,FnRNW6�41A11MMYEfAI l� - IraOxoEreirsarAvl N n iix.Ns HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN ^ rax INDUSTRIAL BUILOINO 8801 HELLMAN AVENUE 1 a xuiawnr-woxr.�u 8 NOW IYPICAISECTNk1•NBlAIAN AVENUE v. .n I I (D W i i C) ILL amc-C F� Tmm SEcnm-MRGN BGULEVARG tt i I i i i � I i BEGT PT) I i1.DlN @ ssaciAl �..� SEenIAL GN$ INDUSTRBUBDING BB01 NELLMAN AVENUE S Rwpp UF.YIgW.�G fi ..... ..... ...... .. rD 3 Do %GW DUAL-VORTEX KnStar Enterprises,Inc j 1 r jr R STORM ORNN PRE-TREATMENT DEVICE DETAIL LON BMP DETAILS E]INFILT11ATI%j SYSTEM RISERXXEAN�UTas INDUSTR IAL BUILDING MCI HELLAUN AVENUE 6 6 y � Z FERON BOULEVARD Lu a-� - . ¢ ;T�- PROPOSED BUILDING r+ co uj I 2 _A o i i PPMMNARYEARDMOPK PFRVKMISM—PFRVpUBMFA& 6EWHAA : 4 s. i @ / lEGeIIX 6 Fk N ��m nru ®.uz 911 1 J. IM `.°ene w°'•o..°Ofwo`'�. CONCEPNAL GRADING AND ares ...e. DRAINAGE PLANWDUSTRIAL BUILDING ..om I MCI HELLMAN AVENUE T PANGpaM'�•Ma11GlG s • F 7�*. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA C�ONGA MARCH 3, 2015 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I• CALL-To ORDER` ACTION Roll Call 7:00 p.m. Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett_ Donald Granger_ • Mike Smith X Alternates: Ray Wimberly_ Frances Howdyshell_ Lou Munoz PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS: The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545- A.Approved. C&C DEVELOPMENT - The request to develop a 60-unit senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land within the Low (L) Residential District (the associated General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment applications propose the High (H) Residential District and the Zoning Map Amendment also proposes establishing the Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH) on the project site), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line • ....... --.. 1 of 2... EXHIBIT J Item B-23 ADESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA �NCHO MARCH 3, 2015 CUCAMONGA Road - APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related files: Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, CEQA Review CEQA2014-00008, General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546,and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00745 B.Approved. — KARISH ARCHITECHTS - Site plan and architectural review of a 15,821 square foot officetwarehouse building on a.89 acre project site located within the General Industrial (GI)Zoning District at the southeast comer of Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard-APN: 0209-032-57. IH. PUBLIC COM ENT3. None. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. IV.. ADJO 7:45 p.m. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m.adjournment time. If items go beyond that time,they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 2ofZ Item B-24 RESOLUTION NO. 15-28 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00745, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 15,821 SQUARE FOOT OFFICEMAREHOUSE/MANUFACTURING BUILDING ON A .89 ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) ZONING DISTRICT ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND FERON BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0209-032-57. A. Recitals. 1. Karish Architects filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2014- 00745 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of April 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 22, 2015, including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a .89 acre project site located on the southeast comer of Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard in the General Industrial (GI) Zoning District; and b. The site is vacant, generally drains from north to south and is approximately 202 feet from east to west and 214 feet from north to south; and C. To the east, west and south are industrial buildings within the General Industrial (GI)Zoning District; and,to the north is a vacant lot within the General Industrial(GI)Zoning District; and d. The applicant is requesting site plan and architectural review of a 15,821 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building; and e. The building is divided into a 2,656 square foot office area and 13,165 square foot • warehouse/manufacturing area; and Item B-25 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-28 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00745_ —KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 Page 2 f. The project conforms will all development standards of the Development Code and General Plan. The Floor Area.Ratio(FAR)is.39 percent, below the maximum permitted .60 percent FAR. The building setback and average depth of landscaping is 25 feet from Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard,which are both classified local streets and have a required setback and average landscape depth of 25 feet. The building height is 33.83 feet, below the maximum height limit of 35 feet. Landscape coverage is 21.5 percent, in excess of the minimum 10 percent requirement and in conformance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. A 5 foot landscape planter is provided adjacent to the south and east property lines along with a 432 square foot covered outdoor employee eating area; and g. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is .39 percent, below the maximum permitted .60 percent FAR; and h. The project includes 26 standard vehicle parking spaces and 1 trailer parking space as required by the Development Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is in accord with the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which it is located.The General Plan states that the General Industrial (GI)designation permits a wide range of industrial activities that include manufacturing, assembling,.wholesale supply and office uses. The proposed 15,821 square foot industrial building is designed for office/warehouse/manufacturing uses and has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of.39 percent, below the maximum FAR of.60 percent. b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The project site is surrounded by industrial development to the east,west and south and by a vacant, industrially zoned land to the north. The proposed 15,821 square foot building is of similar design and intensity to the surrounding industrial development. C. The proposed development will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City including building and parking setbacks; average landscape depth; floor area ratio; parking; dock and storage area screening, landscape coverage, site planning, and architecture. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as all activities will take place within an enclosed building and will comply with all related local, State and Federal requirements. 4. Prior to any action being taken on this entitlement,the Planning Director has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under .State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332,which covers in-fill development that does not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. The project scope is for the development of a 15,821 square foot office/manufacturing/warehouse'building on a.89 acre vacant site. The Planning Director finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment based upon the following: Item B-26 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-28 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00745—KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 Page 3 • a. The project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations. The General Plan and zoning designations for the project site is General Industrial (GI), which permits office/manufacturing/warehouse buildings. b. The proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than 5 acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.The.89 acre project site is within the city limits and is surrounded by urban uses. There is industrial development of similar design and intensity to the east, west and south and vacant industrially zoned land to the north. C. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species.An Initial Biological Analysis(TeraCor Resource Management, November 24, 2014)was performed on the project site which determined that the vacant, graded site contains limited vegetation and has no substantial or important biological resources. The Biological Analysis concluded that the proposed project would not affect any sensitive species and that no further investigation is warranted at this time. Staff contacted the biologist(Jared Reed,TeraCor Resource Management)that drafted the Initial Biological Analysis to discuss the potential for the burrowing owl to habitate the project site. Staff was informed that there were no burrowing owls found on the project site but that there was always the potential for the burrowing owl to habitate the site in the future. Staff has added a Condition of Approval to this Resolution of Approval requiring burrowing owl and nesting bird surveys prior to the approval of a grading plan. • d. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. I. Traffic-The proposed 15,821 square foot industrial building is estimated to produce 15 two-way peak hour trips per day based on the Trip Generation Manual.The City's traffic model does not consider a project to have a significant impact on the roadway system until it exceeds 50 two-way peak hour trips; as such, the effect on the environment is not significant. II. Noise - The project approval will include Conditions of Approval which regulate the time of day when construction activity may occur. The Development Code includes Performance Standards which regulate noise levels within the General Industrial(GI)Zoning District. All business activities are required to be performed within an enclosed building and the project site is not located adjacent to a residential district; as such, the effect on the environment is not significant. III. Air Quality-An Air Quality and Green House Gas Analysis was prepared for the project(CAJA Environmental Services, LLC, March 2015). Emissions were calculated using the CAIEEMod 2013.2.2 model. The study concluded that the project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for construction emissions, localized emissions or operational emissions.The report also concluded that the project will be consistent with all feasible and applicable strategies recommended by the California Assembly Bill 32(AB 32)Scoping Plan.As a result,the project's cumulative impact on air quality and climate change is not significant. IV. Water Quality — The project has submitted a Preliminary Water Quality Management Exhibit(Walden&Associates, December 19,2014)that complies with the most recent • State and local water quality requirements; as such, the effect on the environment is not significant. Item B-27 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-28 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ORC2014-00745—KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 Page 4 e. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.The project will be served by the City's utility and service providers who each have adequate capacity to meet the project's level of service demand. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Director's determination of exemption, and based on their own independent judgment, concurs with Planning Director's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the development of a 15,821 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building located on the southeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard-APN: 0209-032-57. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) This project is subject to compliance with Executive Order B-29-15. Final design of the Landscape Plan shall be subject to Planning Director review for compliance with Executive Order B-29-15 for drip or micro spray systems. Environmental Conditions of Approval Air Quality Short Term (Construction) Emissions. 1) All clearing,grading,earth-moving,or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 2) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 4) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be Itpm R-2R PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-28 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00745—KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 • Page 5 ; utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 5) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 6) All asphalt shall meet or exceed 'performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 7) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 8) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 9) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall • be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Item B-29 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-28 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00745—KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 Page 6 10) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 11) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Lonq Term Emissions 12) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 13) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 14) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 15) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 16) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 17) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 18) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 19) All industrial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 20) All industrial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 21) All industrial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 22) All industrial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. Biologic Resources 1) Prior to approval of a.Grading Permit, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Submit the written report outlining the findings to the Planning Department within 3 days of groundbreaking activity. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either(a)the adult Item B-30 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-28 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00745—KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 • Page 7 birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation,or(b)the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. 2) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity.The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: • Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D(Breeding and Non-breeding Season Surveys and Reports)of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre-construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre-construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre-construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in • coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period.These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre-construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. • During the non-breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non- migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre-construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. • During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback,as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary"no construction"area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Item B-31 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-28 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00745—KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 Page 8 Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments,using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an.in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay,to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, Itpm R—R7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-28 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00745—KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 Page 9 • the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-or diesel-powered engines where feasible. • 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere witht eak-hour traffic. affic. Item B-33 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-28 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00745—KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 Page 10 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 7) Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. 8) Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 9) Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, use daylight as an integral part of the lighting systems in buildings. 10) install light-colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. 11) Install energy-efficient heating and cooling systems, appliances and equipment and control systems. 12) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use"Green Building Materials"such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 13) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED'.$)for outdoor lighting. 14) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: Item B-34 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-28 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00745— KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 Page 11 • • Install s water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 15) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b)An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to • control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Item B-35 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-28 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00745—KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 Page 12 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Exhibit prepared by Walden & Associates to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. . 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading Activities 7) Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level- monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. Item B-36 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-28 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00745—KARISH ARCHITECTS April 22, 2015 • Page 13 3) The perimeter screen wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of April 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item B-37 Project# DRC2014-00745 CEQA2014-00016 Project Name: Hellman Feron Industrial ® Location: --- 020903257-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. ROJECT.B. Enaineerina Services Department 8. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 9. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services .Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project 10. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the • percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 11. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Hellman Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Street Lights Street Trees Access Ramps 12. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Feron Boulevard Curb& Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Access Ramps Printed:3/30/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 14 Item B-38 Project#: DRC2014-00745 CEQA2014-00016 Project Name: Hellman Feron Industrial Location: ---020903257-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineerinct Services Department 1. Hellman Avenue frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Industrial" standards as required and including: a. Provide curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, property line adjacent sidewalk, access ramp, street trees and curbside drain outlet on Hellman Avenue frontage. b. Provide two(2)5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights. c. Provide a signing and striping plan for Hellman Avenue. 2. Feron Boulevard frontage improvements to be in accordance with City ".Industrial" standards as required and including: a. Provide curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, property line adjacent sidewalk, drive approach and street trees. b. Provide two(2)5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights. c. Provide a signing and striping plan for Feron Boulevard. 3. Feron Boulevard shall be constructed full width curb to curb, including street lights, from east property line prolongation to Hellman Avenue. Off-site street trees and sidewalk may be deferred until development of adjacent property. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the costs for improvements north of the centerline of Peron Boulevard from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 4. The developer shall request that the City appropriately process a vacation of the City excess 11-foot right-of--way on Hellman Avenue. Said vacation of right-of-way shall be incorporated into the development. 5. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 6. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Hellman Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite south of the southerly project boundary to the first pole north of Peron Boulevard, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. 7. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Printed:3/30/2015 www.CRyofRC.us Page 3 of 14 Item R-39 Project#: DRC2014-00745 CEQA2014-00016 Project Name: Heilman Feron Industrial • Location: —-020903257-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Dew rtment 8. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 10. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 11. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 12. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided. 13. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in • effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 14. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations. 15. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 16. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking, with a minimum of one rack with a capacity for two bicycles. 17. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations generally in front of, and along, the screen walls that enclose the dock areas and not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corners of each building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the buildings. 18. Outdoor furniture shall be provided in the outdoor employee eating areas. All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc.) shall be permanent, uniform, and of durable materials. Printed:3/30/2015 WWW.CltyOfRC.us Page 2 of 14 Item B-40 Conditions of Approval CurAAfONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2014-00745 CEQA2014-00016 Project Name: Hellman Feron Industrial Location: —-020903257-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. • 3. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 4. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 5. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 6. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees-24-inch box or larger. 7. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. Printed:3/30/2015 WUAAI.CityofRC.us Item B-41 Project#: DRC2014-00745 CEQA2014-00016 Project Name: Hellman Feron Industrial Location: ---020903257-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Enalneerina Services Department 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the.City's street tree program. Printed:3/30/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 14 Item B-42 Project#: DRC2014-00745 CEQA2014-00016 Project Name: Hellman Feron Industrial • Location: —-020903257-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. ROJECT.B. Ennineerina Services Department 15. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Hellman Avenue Botanical Name-Eucalyptus polyanthemos Common Name-Silver Dollar Gum Min. Grow Space-5' Spacing-40'0.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Printed:3/30/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 14 Item B-43 Project#: DRC2014-00745 CEQA2014-00016 Project Name: Hellman Feron Industrial Location: —-020903257-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Deoartment 16. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Feron Boulevard Botanical Name-Pyrus betulaefolia"Paradise" Common Name-Dancer Flowering Pear Min. Grow Space-5' Spacing-40'0.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 17. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 18. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.. 19. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District. (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. C. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Printed:3/30/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 14 Item B-44 Project#: DRC2014-00745 CEQA2014-00016 Project Name: Hellman Feron Industrial ® Location: ---020903257-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: C. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit 1. Access Doorways: 'Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the current edition of California Building/Fire Codes and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 2. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 3. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the Site Plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for plan review. 4. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with RCFPD Standard 5-9. • 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standards. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 6. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for approval. • Printed:3/30/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 14 Item B-45 Project#: DRC2014-00745 CEQA2014-00016 Project Name: Heilman Feron Industrial Location: ---020903257-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: C. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit 7. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard 5-1. 8. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1 st story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 9. Roof Access: must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard. There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures more than 10,000 square feet or with roof more than 15 feet in height and less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by the Fire Department aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix. h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). 10. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. c. The minimum outside tum radius shall be 50 feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. i. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. us Printed:3/30/2015 www.QtyofRC. Page 9 of 14 Item B-46 Project#: DRC2014-00745 CEQA2014-00016 Project Name: Hellman Feron Industrial Location: ---020903257-0000 ® Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. C. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit 11. The current edition of California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm Standard 9 3 require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standards. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. 12. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of the proposed project site. 13. Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until the fire protection water supply plans are approved. 14. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 15. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. D. Building and Safety Services Deaartment 1. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineers stamp and"wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. • 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Printed:3/30/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 14 Item B-47 Project#: DRC2014-00745 CE=014-00016 Project Name: Hellman Feron Industrial Location: —-020903257-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEOA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- D.- ROJECT.D. Building and Safety Services Deoartment 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Services Department. 6. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. 7. Provide draft stops in attic areas in accordance with CBC Section 1505. 8. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC 9. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 10. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 11. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 12. Roofing materials shall be Class'A" 13. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind"instructions. 14. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be in accordance with the CBC. 15. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 16. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 17. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. 18. Prior to issuance of permit issuance for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, and Transportation Development Fee. 19. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 20. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department public counter). Printed:3/30/2015 www.QtyofRC.us Page 11 of 14 Item B-48 Project#: DRC2014-00745 CEQA2014-00016 Project Name: Hellman Feron Industrial • Location: ---020903257-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the-approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. • 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 12. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. • 13. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. Printed:3/30/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 14 Item B-49 Project# DRC2014-00745 CEQA2014-00016 Project Name: Hellman Feron Industrial Location: —-020903257-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 15. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 16. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 17. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 18. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 19. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 20. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector, b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 21. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP)devices. . 22. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 23. The precise grading and drainage plan shall show the flooding limits within the parking lot. 24. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. Printed:3/30/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 14 Item B-50 Project#: DRC2014-00745 CEQA2014-00016 Project Name: Hellman Feron Industrial • Location: ---020903257-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- E.-Grading ROJECT.E. Grading Section 25. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 26. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 27. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 28. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 29. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 30. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm • Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 31. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed:3/30/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 14 Item B-51 • STAFF REPORT PLANNINGDEPARTM ENr Date: April 22, 2015 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00914 - JWDA: A review of six (6) single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a previously approved subdivision in the Low (L) Residential District located about 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court - APNs: 0201-182-36, -37, and -38. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391. On November 10, 2010, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391. Per Section 15162, no further environmental review is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Development Review DRC2013-00914 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Low (L) Residential District South- Single-Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District East - Single-Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District West - Single-Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential North - Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The project site is comprised of three (3) parcels with combined dimensions of approximately 659 feet (north to south) by approximately 178 feet (east to west) and an area of 122,000 square feet (2.8-acres). The project site is located 200 feet south of the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court, on the east side of Winchester Court (Exhibit B). A tentative tract map ("the map") for the purpose of subdividing the property into six (6) lots for single-family residential development was approved by the Planning Commission on November 10, 2010 (related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391, Exhibits D, K, and Q. Staff notes to the Commission that the property was sold to another property owner in the interim period since the approval of the map and • that the applicant for the subject application is unrelated to the applicant for the map. The site is partially developed at the north side with a single-family residence that is pending Item C-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00914—JWDA April 22, 2015 Page 2 demolition. To ensure that the removal of the residence would not result in the loss of a culturally or historically important resource, research on the background of the house was conducted. According to a report submitted by architect Joe A. Ramos (on behalf of the applicant for the map in 2010), the structure has no cultural or historical significance. To the south, east, and west are single-family residences. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District. The subject property slopes north to south. The elevation at the north side is approximately 1,783 feet. At the south side the elevation is approximately 1,767 feet but, due to a significant change in slope, at the south property line of the site, the elevation is approximately 1,755 feet. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence on each lot of the above- noted subdivision for a total of six (6) single-family residences (Exhibit E). The floor area of the houses (including the garages) will range between 4,288 square feet (Plan A) to 5,389 square feet (Plan D). There will be four (4) distinct footprints— Plans A, B, C, and D—and a "reverse° footprint of Plan C, for a total of five (5) footprints (Exhibit F). Two of the houses (Plans A and D) will be one-story while the houses on the remainder of the lots will be two-story. This equates to 33% of the lots having single-story houses. This percentage of one- and two-story homes complies with Section 17.122.010 of the Development Code that requires 25% of all single-family detached units within single-family residential development consisting of four(4) or more units to be single-story. As noted previously, the project site is mostly bound by existing residential development. The subdivision to the south is about 10 feet lower in elevation than the project site. Although not required by Code, the applicant was instructed to.plot a single-story house on Lot 6 so that potential impacts to existing property owners to the south, such as the loss of privacy and/or blocked views due to the grade difference, would be minimized. Staff also requested that the applicant plot the house 10 feet from the south property line (instead of at the setback line of 5 feet). The other single-story house will be on Lot 1. The architecture of each house will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code. Each house will have an articulated footprint/floor plan and profile with a variety of movement in the wall planes and roof lines. Each house will have a front entrance comprised of either an enclosed courtyard or a covered porch. The plotting of each house will be at a distance from the street that exceeds the minimum 37 foot setback requirement that applies in the Low (L) Residential District. The applicant proposes a single architectural theme that incorporates the form/massing and details derived from Italian architecture (Exhibit G). The use of a single theme is consistent with the subdivision located directly to the west (on the opposite side of Winchester Court). The houses on that side of the street are generally differentiated from one another by the use of different colors, materials, and trim. Following review by the Design Review Committee on December 2, 2014, the applicant revised the architecture of each proposed house at the direction of the Committee so that they would be further differentiated from each other in a similar manner. Thus, although Units 2 and 4, and Units 3 and 5 will have the same footprints (Plan B and Plan C, respectively), they will not be identical. For example, Unit 2 will be finished with stucco only, and have arched soffits at various windows, at the balconies, and at the open porch/patio. In contrast, Unit 4 will have, in addition to the typical stucco finish, a stone veneer along its base, and have "square"windows with, at some locations, decorative iron grating, and square soffits at the balconies and open porch/patio. Item C-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00914—JWDA April 22, 2015 ® Page 3 The color scheme and the balusters (at the balconies and decks) for Units 2 and 4 will differ, as well. Units 3 and 5 will have similar differences. Roofing on all houses will be barrel tile. The garage doors for Plan B will not face the street. For Plan D, the doors of one of the garages will face the street while the door of the other garage will face the side yard. B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391 was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Lions Center East located at 9161 Base Line Road on August 9, 2010. Several individuals from the surrounding community attended. None of them had any specific objections to the project. However, there were concerns about impacts related to construction activity which Staff addressed to the satisfaction of those in attendance. A second neighborhood meeting for the subject application was conducted at Hermosa Elementary School located 10133 Wilson Avenue on December 10, 2014 (Exhibit H). Several individuals from the surrounding community attended this meeting. As before, none of them had any specific objections to the project but had similar concerns about impacts related to construction activity. Staff stated that there are mitigation measures that must be followed by developers to control impacts such as dust and noise. There were also questions about the scope of the public improvements within Winchester Drive. Staff indicated that the developer will be required to provide all improvements along Winchester Drive, except along the frontage of the property (APN: 0201-182-07) located immediately to the north of the project site. As that property is not-a-part of the project site, and under separate ownership, the improvements in front of it would occur at a later date when it is developed. • C. Grading Review and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review and Technical Review Committees reviewed Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391 on September 14, 2010. All of the grading and technical aspects of the overall project were analyzed at that time. The Committees accepted the proposal and recommended approval. In the interim period since then, the proposed grading plan for the project has been revised slightly at the south end of the site to account for the building footprints and plotting (which were not known at the time that the tentative tract map was reviewed by the City). Staff notes to the Commission that during that within the last year, the Grading Review Committee was dissolved. Review of the grading plans is now conducted during plan check. The City is currently reviewing the rough and precise grading plans for the project to verify that the grading of the site is consistent with the previously approved conceptual grading plans. When the Technical Review Committee reviewed the proposal again on December 2, 2014, as only the architecture is being reviewed as part of the subject application, the previous recommendation of approval remains unchanged with only a few, if any, added conditions of approval. D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Munoz and Granger) reviewed Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391 on September 14, 2010. The Committee accepted the proposal noting that the overall design of the lots was typical, and identical, to the subdivision across the street (Exhibit 1). Houses were not included as a part of the tentative tract map application at that time. The Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) reviewed the subject application on December 2, 2014 (Exhibit J). The Committee generally accepted the architecture subject to the completion of revisions that were identified in Staffs Comments Report. The Committee directed the applicant to work with Staff on the necessary revisions. In the interim period since the meeting, • the applicant prepared and submitted revised plans, and Staff verified that they were acceptable for review by the Planning Commission. The Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. Item C-3 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00914—JWDA April 22, 2015 Page 4 E. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 10, 2010, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18931. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; no new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; and no additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. There have been no substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Negative Declaration. The associated tentative tract map was for the purpose of developing the property with single-family residences. Therefore, the construction and operational characteristics of the project are as anticipated. The tentative tract map is substantially the same as was approved. There are no significant physical changes to the map such as the layout of the lots, grading, and fence/Wall heights. Conditions on-site and on adjacent properties are generally the same as they were when the map was reviewed and approved. The site is surrounded by residential structures/uses and no significant new development has occurred in the general vicinity. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received. Respectfully submitted, Candyce rnett Planning Director CB:MS/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18931 (for reference only) Exhibit E - Site Plan Exhibit F - Floor and Roof Plans Exhibit G - Elevations (black and white, and colored) Exhibit H - Neighborhood Meeting Summary and Sign-In Sheet Exhibit I - Design Review Committee Comments for SUBTT18391 (September 14, 2010) Exhibit J - Design Review Committee Comments (December 2, 2014) Exhibit K - Staff Report(without exhibits)for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18931 Item C-4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00914—JWDA April 22, 2015 ® Page 5 Exhibit L - Resolution of Approval No. 10-51 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18931 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2013-00914 • Item C-5 h ippl c R .a. a AM'1'.O Si � - _ 3 .I 4 LAWkDX 2�G 3. � w.rxPG'4, ! ♦ hu °i j 41MP1.__ P111Vto �R. CAM,FAR PR( Ybg. .mtyrwruro YGr]r FARel a+MD 3�.rxnnxL 4 n .. .x x m'a5 CT vYx, EF9Cy � Ra .,n UANNT xPP�00v5 rr .. I. t Y.r ztrv:..a IEPYM�u0.1�,- y �� �1. ., ..✓x IrtG'I E i ° rx '��4EA ai .. nlm4 t^' - IJ µp GxCJ.xATfr - £ AYby A Coal +m.a,_- q. nq,+N`[ rn � t P• un w 1 0.f w ..ismer ra a r n �„ u n S( "+crv4 11 1 Y w f,.. xv x0A r •+ «r. "'� a _HILLSIHERO 'a '"'" x - wt --- " HIL SI�F.RjI_ Tb-rt _ 3a �' a HrtLS)E RD 5 r HERITAGE g In xrl!^ t a" 0'r- -a.s COMMUNITY PARKm a - m aaoXxcopro m A i m r+Arn�t s W', 46 Ir wxa+w � 3 r sxr.. WlLp'ONAVE a^ .. D : W°am �HERM IT. W.I m. S N aYE.. a = III333 rQ G � C qg Y � sYA ^$ �:I MIPMROF JC49[�!A.f m ,uu mw.cgz 3 2 M ; CHAFFEY fP06w w" IIIn 2 Inr MSi.rare Wmp- 1'z t,NPA.PRIiA DR _ - j N'. .. 1 ; �wwpA.nua..n S+3atfi°'°Ca{rdi�� COLLEGE nwma° 3 jr. PILL - „+3 L'. _�r� BARYAN SLS 'I rr<cn .:«wn x ° ianA wi frrnw rr.rm - - Yx i d Li BANYAN •.n '�O� ; :v /J T. a.. w,, 36ALTA uwoppp ^ ctRp o < , LO;A PROJECT SITE I i.. s s ' A Y N w Fp''' A� o�A_..•rI r"(- � ataT i�'NVINEYARD J. .BL PARR ..n.« r HIGIfl9H0AVE__;I Ji _ won 3 r rF T 0 f r r A A A istrRmex¢!p _.a.'"f p�uw .p -r ' rm�mew -µagn °"" YyI'g.,�I '13 i ,y} i'y`"` � a s "` ar,:w uruvNwn 'xiitrxx S# ! i.Flrp v°t0'A°itwrnorp mw.n '�'r'L. �1 �x $M.� ! 'Yl :« sRSlrS. > ` y�,✓rG '3 :I L a 'SMI N1 �I rte. P �� k $� if I�rpac=-e .�. -TH5�.3't'.aoc �"o +sYS° r,,`�,���y T� sp•� oEER ,rv.5 O1 '7° j " CANYON , p 'p {w..gXA .yagUyeu i; wcor.tr- 1u 1ICNAICTiA "a-•-r' 4a' A tg�'ae'.5 lre,x r z..Ao -t'ARK g� eau, x I 1 4 Sr - � �LYLCIOHIA 4 C T .ixP'�'ln YR49 ' 'bry ,.wp_ is ` [ ti gv'A .n W 3 � 1�r.+},, rr runaw ,wN^ "' s•.4uP'rvw*�.n ��-$p�tf— yr w' °'rad arr'j 4i� 51 aa'vA . S' 3' ' GII 5' 3srrrm I�Sy"'F x R �i a47r. d ° :s d F's� n J`A,x, na�nn 1Y r/IIN _......., ovroa�" W? 61l,Ywen ' r; "�" V4r4J I' m�°a ee uYrter4;,b,,r` •�w�r., l aNHxRg ALTA ,¢G ,. 6� ....,{.'.mG .Eet> .e�(i'„ i "'�{LOM ARNELMN "7RYK. .P.0 3{ If 5 G y i mYvRtl 6 a.-aM wear 4w°. 3 Y6"` I : 4 w i ALTA c: i �ra_i L awnn r£1 u„ Y� a Jn•A wr.:w., a cw COMMA 1 { uua 5. j+ 2 ms. A°a"'-'ii cwt �h s .y: R.WCf10 CVCAMONGA , x m YWrrPE @(roxssnP y 4inxmY > .ma. ail ^ CE PARK ASE_ ONEII G' Eq axo'. RD '.� 'o s �_ .: lip �#_BP$.� 41N RD . —NtenaUii'w ![TA7C �INA IIC KL/SRAtI{'D t "m��t � -^a,. m r 1 _ gI i p a-m y ,. m 4si!ti�9 r, "� : s' ! L' ° gg z r Ti ftF� cnuL a ar d -r 3�,ati � m � YXa .nrxa ° _ a pp I E a 9 i, D `=r HILL w1wA € r / Y iT R n'"�°'r yA i P�MX �• PALO" �XTO ST , .r, N,am o4 ePAL04lN,Si to � �. #e .a¢„ 5 S mn sALsh, sr rwu„� �. °" r,+:NstareKw'1--ro °s yx `.L 1 39 Y n ) g' 9 a'r© 1'+ux y]°e. r'L'a.�Qgs` DIM FUCANONCAA f wv<a4rr Axaxtx000df 7 0� xr 3i MfACE0e " 5 w ` iA zx (3NNCh1 4p RUTH6 x S G r e 3 d� 2 ft II SflrEfiT gq x5epf.f 'a-1'l MU65ER CHURCHST A 7a STRI *iX�'aa 1 a�'i""n' aI .'� ST !PARI �a45 P Y PARK wq 2 'j �' _y 11 G �COYOTfi .:I I� 2�YNCfA7ErrrvYON -pVN F<FN f li t ROq, 'I INV RALFHAI If cervrRAL r TERRA VISTA'_ u.wa(1RK� .x EXHIBIT A TOWN CENTER HISTORIC .COURT IHOUSELix{� Item C— " Development Review DRC2013-00914 -T41 Wi' etI r MEW + A,, ij �- a ti3:.. Arw v NO 179 Pro'ect Site*y ,. 1. ' a .•) ��t t .igW . 4:r +f S 4 ��yy'a+pt5aa, f EXHIBIT B J3wY �+frvM1�rl TI: _- �r'awnki� 'em�lrw+rorajw: _llaw I11I✓.M/'t11QM.YiP�S � iF 4l 4A! q71 Mou�arurt afa _ f Ej E2D -� t _ o cc _ — - ln.ri Q I ui m X TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 18381 � ea arra.r>raers _ _ .� \ w.t.r. Al'6 fil4YP R>OL:L:'4t�L -_ •xv•• u.w...0 ..W.x i Vis. ...... r.4.•r.w eD kD IW II I I I � 5s V t `__—. $ ur• '� ,ora �a I(�. lOr� Ci� �y I€ lm', jyq��r�1 R �,, �'SS"`� ,:..,.;;:{'F �~�•.,... ...��.yam._. ��:'.�...... ..� 1y6+, � , Scok i' - 20' asa.mul.a.. �.Lin�mwr '�w :,c _ Pik— n:,e.wl.'.w[o 6 UNM3 SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE rr\ Ar 777, F m Cal co Co L K jpiOigi mmw"Wm�mw c RLORAREA�yvs 11 WI�STER CMT r, m. ---------------------------- WT ME&av �A Lwui-L,m-Lm—j—.. J-I ummomo" rose " Fm 0 1A 41LSflWrt �IETAIL M.EVAIM YJ biampwpy -' I g Eg {� ' e�� SNglYtia-B I lllfl Bp C$Y 9 <2 3ena�A�YYd acre euria = __�� =Vm� Itl 3 0 i 1 rrn y-e .ccc I � a9 ® 1 } ® - D I .o-d ane .o-ct .rc .Fa .ce i-.a .ru �i C d Is EXHIBIT F Item C-11 zvoz v 9xo — ��.ra rl� �� '� �3duriwv wrid aooid asbi�^ S4VMo I I .osi aw ___ _ __________ _ F/X ® '1'fllil I'lli��4 IW Ip 0 '.'� L1 o = _____________ ------- _________ one Zen l ----------------------- .o-s on Ilb' Ili' ePP � Wtl eOPPA AOP, ________________ ______________________ _ . Pf--------------_-_---_ ---------------- =N=p' tl=Xfi9p• i . 1 ----------- 117 ------------ ---- h i nn f� - hl•� ryf rl ----------------------- - •� i�d�lifi:tl1�1111 4 I �. .. .I - ____ __________ ---------- WO I N O dd i 5 e]mm, n• FIST FLLbR PLPN T : m q0 F FLAN T 3 D� 2 AMM x4w ---------------------- ------------ CD a _t Q � w I•iIP i��di wi di ryldl�l�l li�i+i�i Q _ h 9 n T N u M E F , , � i i `Q• � 4 a i � �• `Y f zw• ------- _�___ gg d sam n'o• � m a $ "• Spr-rd Hs FISTR 11-M IT4 2 O.Mo FLOJR T4 m 014° A 21) 4 9♦K' Il'9 IiL' W'i' Ri' ---------------------- r.. q ?===f_.st=; _3= ----------------- ------------ a r i x u xr . x . rwr, r x ..r I .u; SQ ------` � I •' .I.ill tHd � � 1 1 i --------------------- y 9 y -----------$i �r________{ __________ ____ m-r ew• e'a• rr-rr ,o.-a. s'-II• mss, ,_ ___ . mo � xa i ommo O F1T IT 5 z SEtOIID F R.ANT L Nee ANO IIi SY ]Yi• �y.l. OF om _= o® , r � t 9 0 ?T IIV' Pi' 1141' J ni , FIWTF ORP 1 1IT 6 tt alae A 10.08 i � 6 - _ WEST ELEVATION J NORTH ELEVATION I a W 3 I G _ EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 6 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE UNIT 1 (TYPE "A") WINCHESTER COURT RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA +[�mq®+sa.nooncss:esu e M ssu+oa�+nre cup no © o o v n © o n v D o m 411A1�1:111y JI r.,.:,.p, I11A111l11111l11P11;1111111j1j:�1�1i1�n _r.r.1Ib.,•1..1.r.=.1..:q.LL1 111111111.1 = L1111111•L1111111111L11111G'1111111I1111•I•I•P 111'1•Ig11l11111111111111 JIIIII•I•I.111.1.11111!1.111•I.1•I.11111!`lI1111•I•I.11111\1. i!' !} tn=..r111•I1111•I.1.1111111111I•It%I!1\ P�1111111I•IIIII•A111111111111I•I•A11,11111:GIJIg4lUilldlilll•IIIIP�. -r;ig11111d1I1g111d1.141i111 Ir1111:14n, = 1•I.11GIi111.11111111.111111111111111111111•I.111lrliil•ItIIIIIlI11ii!'1••1.1 1!\. 11.. � r11\14!1!1.11111•I.11'GIJIIIIII'•Itl•I•Ilill•P 1.1.11111 lI1111t111111.111.111111111111111•.11,111r1,i11111.111111r11111111 r!I•r11111111.111111Pr- !1 111111:x= _�n1111l111l 1.111114 GI11.1111111111.1l111.111111j11�l�1r1111\In. _ •Id1:IDlii111.1111111111111111111.111111111.11111111:111i1d111111111114411l1111P1\14lr11111d11d1111Pr 1 1 1 q.i�l,l�i_3- _-^11111111114Rr2 A11111111111111JI1P111.111111111111111lll•111111111111•I.1l111•dd111411l141,4444T. �IIllIS1411�•1 1 1 1111 t t1 1 1 1 11 1r•iG 1•■1 1 1 1■1 1 1 1 1.1 1 1 1.1 114 1 1 1 1 1 1 _I,,I__ '411�1l;G1111111111111111111111111111111411111111•rGiJ11111\r.11111111y,• •��_._Ilia�Y`iy;i-'i111AAF=41¢IiAP1•' -iiili!ililrlGlll';==li 1•;:11l�! I �!�1.1a14SI�d1441 lI - _:_i!_iii11141P1!_lll, __ 1AA.- _ .. a. Ira;ia..1h,. . . _t 1! - .I• ___ L-I 1;:..1_L-.°.1.. - LL.I_h Gam• ip Im © ill Q o © © v n o m I I I PI I I •111111111111111111111 1'Inl•I.1•PI••Inl•1•I•PI•I•I.1•PI.1•PNI•I.1•Inlnil 411111111111111111111.11111114!1! 1111111111111111111111111111111.1111111441111111111l1111111111111111111,. 111111111111111111111!11 11111111111111.11111111111111111111111111111111111111111•IJp. I a�rE r•P1111111\1441P1\11111.111444.1111111.1111P1111\11111441111.1111111111111111111111111111111111111114411111111114111111111111111111111111.r q11.1111111111111111111.11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.11111111111111111111111111111111111•.1111111111111111111411114111PI- _�'. �_u... 11111111111.11141111.111111111114111111111i4411111111411111•I.111114011 114411.111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.1111111111111111111111111111111.1.1.1111111 1 . iiiiilililil\d1�1�1� 1���1�1�1� 111•L111111111111111111111111111111111111.111111111114111111.111111111114111111111111111111114111111111111441111Gi4l1�111lI\1.r I I 1 14 11 I•r111111111111111.1111111111111411111111111111111111111111111111111111111r1111111111111111•11111111111111111111111111111.1-1.111111111.1', 'n1111111111111111111111,111111111111.144111161,11111l1111111�1�1�1�1�111�1!!1111111411�111t1l11111�1'�j1111lIl1111111111111lI�IS1S1lIS1�1�1�111l1�11111.1111111111111111111111111111111111111\I:Ir4l111l1\1.. _ -111111111111111!11111.1111111\Il111l1l111111 '•'r.r.r.r.ra' 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111111111111111111.' - •' '1111t1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111\1!!11�1111111n, 11. 111.1�1111111�1�1�1�1.14.111111111�1�1�11111•I�ri 1111111�1�1\11111111 41111111111.11111111111111 J111111111�1�1l111�111111!111111!1441111\11111�1�14�!444!1, Ii i i rr " "' ICI liCll IC[r71 i 1 4444 1 41141i1i1i441itdilPPlli1i41i1A1441i1i111d14ai44441i1i1i1i444441i444 444 .1 ililililiiililili ili'1 1 ' '� +�• 141d14l;••fM 1dl4.11dd11Pr41ddA14441444444441t1 111.11!!1.1111111 1111 1 i'�ii!. 1.111111' 111�1J11111111r4i.111111111\1„/1111111111111.11141111441111111111.11111114111111.11111114411111111.11111.111111�111l1111�111q � •� 111d!yi411l11111111 111111.�A111114444.111111r1111111r1r•144111111111111•I•r1111411111141r1111\I\1111111111.1.11111114t�L1 •,•r- �" ,r111111111111111111.11111111111t1111 11i..••1111111111411:(11J.11I111'11•1\11111111111111111111111111111.1111111114l11141!1141•1I.4111.11r1111111114111.11111.11i1141%1411111�11141•1I11n1111�1111111111111111111111411411t1111111!111111111I111111111111111II1�114.\4111_11_14_1•_1I11111111111\11I\11111111111111111,111i1114•.111�I,11I11I1i1I.•11141.!1111111411111141111111111111-111111-11\.I1'F�11i1O1\I�Z�����_--rI� .111111111111!11,1111111l1111111111l.1111111.114r=''41111111111 _ ..•111111! 11.1.11111111111111^ �-"' 1111111111 111111111111111111111111111 11141111111.11111111'n1,11111•I.11111111111111111!11111.1111111111111111111111111111111!1111}'41111 rr��11 14111144SI•I.11�141111111rl111111111.11111111111111111111111111144111\ r•1!111\111111111111�IIr!'1141111411441111111141111.111.111.1111111111111111111t111111111111r111111.i'll '� �� Imo' 141'•.IJ I I In �11:,:r• 'n11r.r1ilirci•i r.rllG1•Ar•ri,:1.IG1GllIG1l1l1:Iil:ril:,ir116141111:16111•i11G1irl1G,:,irir.r:1\1��-i. - 111�1�1114.1.1111'11111111111111.1111111111111111.11111111111111I1I.11111n. _ Jr.ddi. r1111.lddu,La.rlrGd111:u,:1:rG1:16.dIF4:1a :dr4:ili:.. O ww � r+ouvn isa I 5N � - s - - — — tea 13 i 1 2 L Cl '�° Z 8 L 9 6 4l I v.0 aecn�ruivn rauv Lwn Z E v !�;Ci;U ipirl� a ZI 41 9 8 L Z I - 3 1:1 El '� r 1Noanl nncw fl wiauwsa � i , 6 ] 14 11 I Lk n1 avow r 71 U V8CSI �.- �`� I EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION t� N "�'� it • - t WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 6 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE UNIT 2 (TYPE "B") WINCHESTER COURT RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA reesn'>e! r,:.m+ais.-see.w=.em na.ar cseen ie rovsv _ _ °°4° N IlV D31� I O� a — � a z t - ,,..,,•,,,,gym;,,, �, , u s c ZI 3 bl a e Ij bj,l;p�'irll a 9 [ I 2 b 9 ZI ♦I SI 5N A,I•,1/I � � 4 u y 4 a � N 1 � or�nrnenn V 1 Ili 3 Nlltl b v i-' 'i r r rli�7' •i:' t.r..h • r ,i:iillJtllii%-�i� ` r�.;I�li� titt9'7'Y 1:wl'•' :.1:,� .. :� ...: ` :•xn ila��p::�l11�"����Fe�k:.._ _ ...:!:4:.�yu:t6�..�dRls�.r�� a._ .«�s�i'�i...'r : aii44eal5iil�ilr�.. — -- --- .Yr1r wia n i�llli'11il�11+!1111 [� .„fi:`Ilr,�a5i I,�;�i�` 5::.y isisn•-^s;'F'N, IIII •�7RYI .t�. ••�iy{tC"76`v3r1 __ ;,i S�ii!:•..i N•1�r'-11. .+I�I.m'sd. leiB...R�..�aN.H...•:Irrwl....:ttt._ ,�CMSiiI"Ii.rG:3A.,,—.._ Imilho ELEVATIONEAST • ELEVATION ,. ..moi �t. ..��: ��•.�.i � WEST �Ee3 s `Y'�fir.�"�'ili!"^p';=�!!. ,(�• lea�:+:t. h� s" 19�z!"���i. , 1. ..+.a�1!l�ll�� �011��!"�" �_.j 1�0..�i:��wt1'�tii11S�"i:+•P4.; ,1 :!F�f;' :�Y31� •!t 1116.C�ii'.:nR�;i�i111"= .. 1 ! 1 . s S:r . ..,._o. _ :.y:ilt-.�..e% _� .... .'lvlii:�w•1.'.e.. .wa :e Itp�Iiiw1..Illi+rl L t l -II 1�1 : i;SA IIVr : i,��=.�^. { r.�,!Ns►µie,.. 11111111111 .ar:5e1t•_ � ,.,itis ..�i: �, r•y�'. 'tea• a2�1-�=,. f �ll '.��1�1���1� I ?i __ _- _ sem. ._.����.;�. ELEVATION • ELEVATION HOUSE6 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY WNCHESTERCOURT RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA :\M:.HIiEI iUYE PL�M!11NG' INiEFIIY DS"IUt. I 5 ] 8 fi 14 17 s — �._ - - - - - r I•���e•rn I•'r dm- 0 MI jl �!;11111�,�6 "- ,amiiii-E-B FF �lXM AAnm 3 � �e QI7 : I 5 I4 12 9 6 7 B 5 hi _ ® o b g m np (�YEST F.I.EVATION � uee `J•w - � A90.06 a t i EO El [D 1st D ..., uv luaora 6 6 M - il I(llih;;�4 OOO jJ�(lijll;IryGi� ®®® a abb4 9- b (1 MCA& EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION N DWI pl � Ilk Loa- WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 6 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE UNIT 4 (TYPE "B") WMCHES RCOURT RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA lU.@Glml W.1@IE56:14➢E 1159011 dL PMEV FLo[A91]I O 5 7 I s 4 8 II 14 Is F Fi , � ji?i rpFll1"IF /150UiH oLEVAtION b F 5 7 11 6 14 8 { f 4 i o �WWWj R S (1=T E3F/AT n f — exe A8008 aen NOLLtl 315 f IgGV/[o M!Mto �• �9 a — a — — — tea a y el EO zl ..a. vec�n mann V R C 3 S 9 8E IF Ell :�s j1 :�t9 �s!"^"0'r'1� "t'lt�r.�j : i r. nt ' �^" t 'iyn°.�; .wi'r. 3:!`r "IL' �0 I:,�n •7'2r►. iD'+...�.u�t. I t. !.; nw ;. . l t•,� :K A:SA��.lM.��'.x({I eG' ....M.. � •�t. �.�. �le .� t1 �••�` Yli!'I:!!DUu'•a..• a �f '1 n.�r'JS:LiT. �.1tri..r�C`�Dr.. vµ`.- r``.'�,`.iii�i �Iic:..tii:y >, .�ti.-. ELEVATIONTE EAST • ' ELEVATION ([y�` •if'�t�i�i�1�` ' i[�.tG- -` . .[ i�',r°'P;` .i f� . �iljiit� r.�9�i1't.r,Stl'+,f.,�ss".�' f ¢t•/��[t•t �► .i' 1 � i73 r ^ 1 t, __ �P h S tM�t14 .rte _ ..7t. .t..]i�Lr �..7rfi:� �:.'[Yil! . _ .s:�q• .� ip'SPiYt�.rf:..: L•W L:' Imorr' . aP:�:f..,, ..W"i�N4t'+tLft..l.i:�:ii�• _ •ailr.■t!:. .. _ .h� - -.fiSliFG/D1S!e-_-- _ r Imo:=■ ��-.- IT { i�I '!_■� �■ r� ��� h�� --- -- — --- z z•*- s �e _ r ELEVATIONWEST • ELEVATION HOUSE6 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY WINCHESTER COURT RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA .,n�nrsrv:c v�¢,r:ion I :-•:. r.:.a;.: FO (03dl.0 l6NOLLtl�Ia'B H IfYI ^Y y j HHKN♦l�'a 3p16 eitn= :'�-:�- NaAAl1 FE3 . VV �fYYf�II ,,. fp l 3 I i i i i i i i i i i i F N Item C-31 day rirorry 7 p yym 6 yy FDM f 4 C 5 9 S [ Z 1 ih i IL ..,.,..e:., N lit . � rn li ; D u dour wa�i 4 N N — — — — — — — — IIII — — 1' II IIry1�41I E 9 d 1 C y C w p �1 4' ..:... will 11 14 1 EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 1Y v. I . Y ni. WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION UNIT 6 (TYPE "D") 6 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE WINCHESTER COURT RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA TEL: Q I%R EM:HUE WSS 00.RJSEMEIO Ctl1110 Neighborhood Meeting DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00914-JW DA: A review of a proposal for 6 single-family residences in conjunction with a 6-lot subdivision of about 1.75 acres in the low(L)Residential districts located about 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court;APNs:0201-182-36,-37,and-38. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391 Meeting Date: December 10, 2014 Meeting Time: 6:00 pm-8:OOpm Meeting Location: Hermosa Elementary School 10133 Wilson Ave,Alta Loma,CA 91737 Summary Neighbor is concerning about: 1. When will be the time line to do the construction? 2. There will have no street improvement between project location to the comer of Wilson and Winchester. Is any way to enforce the property owner to finish the street improvement at the same time?And there is a school nearby and how to prevent the traffic jam during the school pick up and drop off? 3. Existing house is not in a good condition. Did the city have any regulation to prevent the homeless live in or people do the drug over there 4. Will the street construction before the building construct? 5. Is there any regulation to prevent the dust during the construction hour? 6. Fence between the south and east side. EXHIBIT H Item C-34 " Sa Address ;I Item C-35 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:00 P.M. Mike Smith September 14, 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18391 - LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION - A request to subdivide a property comprised of 3 parcels into 6 parcels in the Low(L) Residential District located near the southeast corner of Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court - APN: 0201-182-36, -37, and -38. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (Mike/Carlo) Design Parameters: The project site is comprised of three (3) parcels with combined dimensions of approximately 659 feet (north to south) by approximately 178 feet (east to west) and an area of approximately 122.000 square feet (2.8 acres), located approximately 200 feet south of the intersection at Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court on the east side of Winchester Court. The site is partially developed with a single-family residence. There are several trees throughout the site. To the north, south, and west are single-family residences, while to the north, was a recently demolished single-family residence. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District. The subject property slopes north to south. The elevation at the north side is approximately 1,783 feet. At the south side, the elevation is approximately 1,767 but, because of a significant change in the slope, at the south property line of the site, the elevation is approximately 1,755. • The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 6 lots for a single-family residential development; the applicant does not intend to construct the homes at this time. The single-family residence and accessory structures will be removed. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in the Development Code. Individual lot areas.will range between 10,339 square feet to 20,147 square feet (which are well in excess of the minimum of 7,200 square feet with a minimum average of 8,000 square feet), the depth of each lot will be at least 178 feet, and the width of each lot will be at least 65 feet average. All of the lots will be conventions{ in design and will mirror the lots of the subdivision directly across the street (Related File: Tract 16421). Access to the project site will be via Winchester Court. The street was constructed with Tract 16421 but unfinished public right-of-way improvements—including pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter—are missing and will be completed at the time this project site is developed with homes. The proposed grading will be similar to the subdivision across the street, and the proposed finished pads of each lot will be stepped to follow the slope of Winchester Court. A series of combination screenlretaining walls between most of the lots except at Lots 1 and 2 will be required. Each of these walls will have an overall height that exceeds the maximum of 6 feet. To address this, the applicant has submitted an application for a Minor Exception (Related File: Minor Exception DRC2010-00113). There will not be any walls in excess of 6 feet along the east property line shared with the residences to the east. Another atypical characteristic of the subdivision is the significant grade difference of approximately 7 feet between Lot 6 and the subdivision to the south. Typically, the applicant would be required to reduce such grade differences to as close to zero as possible, but the finished surface elevation of Winchester Court, the sewer line beneath it, and the finished grades of the property to the west and east preclude this option. Therefore, when a house is built on Lot 6, that house will be situated higher than the residence to the south. • EXHIBIT I DRC ACTION COMMENTS SUBTT18391 —LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION September 14, 2010 Page 2 Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. The construction of all walls with a height in excess of 6 feet is subject to the approval of Minor Exception DRC2010-00113. 2. The removal of any trees on the site is subject to the review and approval of a Tree Removal Permit. 3. Double-wall/fence conditions shall be eliminated, if possible. The applicant shall contact the neighboring property owners to east to obtain permission and coordinate the removal of any existing fence that is currently along the east property line. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved with the above items listed incorporated into the Conditions of Approval and be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed the proposed subdivision and deemed the application acceptable as submitted The Committee recommends approval to the Planning Commission, Members Present: Munoz, Granger Staff Planner. Mike Smith Item r-17 f' r • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith December 2, 2014 DRC2013-00914—JWDA -A review of six (6) single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a previously approved subdivision within the Low (L) Residential District, located about 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court - APNs: 0201-182-36, -37, and -38. Related case: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391. Background: A tentative tract map for the purpose of subdividing the property into six (6) lots for a single-family residential development, filed by Amin Khan, was approved for this project site by the Planning Commission on November 10, 2010 (Related case: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391). To date, the final map has not been recorded. The property has since been sold to the applicant's client for the development/construction of the homes. Site Characteristics: The project site is comprised of three (3) parcels with combined dimensions of approximately 659 feet (north to south) by approximately 178 feet (east to west) and an approximate area of 122,000 square feet (2:8 acres). The project site is located approximately 200 feet south of the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court, on the east side of Winchester Court. The site is partially developed with a ,single-family residence which has been determined to not be a significant cultural/historic resource and is pending demolition. To the south, east, and west are single-family residences. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District. • The subject property slopes north to south. The elevation at the north side is approximately 1,783 feet. At the south side the elevation is generally approximately 1,767 feet, but because of a significant change in the slope at the south property line of the site, the elevation is approximately 1,755 feet. General: The applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence on each lot of the above-noted subdivision for a total of six (6) single-family residences. The floor areas of the houses (including the garages) will range between 4,288 square feet (Plan A) to 5,389 square feet (Plan D). Two (2) of the houses (Plan A and D) will be one-story, while the houses on the remainder of the lots will be two-story. This equates to 33 percent of the lots having single-story houses. This percentage of one-and two-story homes complies with Section 17.122.010 of the Development Code that requires 25 percent of all single-family detached units within single-family residential development consisting of four (4) or more units to be single-story. As noted previously, the project site is mostly bound by existing residential development. The subdivision to the south (Tract 10827) is approximately 10 feet lower in elevation than the project site. Reducing the finished elevations of the proposed subdivision to match Tract 10827 is not possible as the subdivision to the west (Tract 16421) and Winchester Court have finished elevations that are also higher than that of Tract 10827. The finished elevations of the project must be at, or near, the same elevation as the street for practical reasons such as adequate stormwater drainage and homeowner access to each lot. Nevertheless, to mitigate any impact on the properties to the south, staff requested that the applicant construct a single-story house on Lot 6 so that potential impacts to the existing property owners to the south, such as the loss of privacy and/or blocked views because of the grade difference, would be • minimized. The staff also requested that the applicant plot the house 10 feet from the south property line instead of at the minimum required setback line of 5 feet. The other single-story house will be on Lot 1. EXHIBIT) Item C-38 DRC AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00914—JWDA December 2, 2014 Page 2 The project includes the construction of perimeter and interior property line walls. The wall along the east property line will be a conventional screen wall of 6 feet in height. The wallsproposed along the north and south property lines will be combination walls comprised of screen walls of 6 feet in height on top of a retaining wall. The retaining wall height will vary depending on the differences between finished grades. The combination wall along the south property line of Lot 6 will be constructed adjacent, and parallel, to an existing property line screen wall. Because of the presence of a concrete V-ditch on the north side of this existing wall, the proposed wall will be off-set from the existing wall a distance generally equivalent to the width of the V-ditch. Since the proposed wallincludes a retaining wall, the screen portion of the wall will be slightly higher than the existing .wall .by approximately 3 feet (Sheet 6- Section F-F). Staff recommends that the part of the proposed wall that projects above the existing wall be an open wrought iron fence instead to match the existing fence at the top of the wall along the common property line between Tracts 10827 and 16421. The architecture of each house will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code. The applicant proposes a single architectural theme that incorporates the form/massing and details derived from Italian architecture. Staff notes to the Committee that the use of a single theme is consistent with the subdivision located directly to the west (on the opposite side of Winchester Court). Each house will be largely finished with stucco and, with the exception of Plan B, will have some stone veneer. Plan B will be exclusively finished with stucco. All plans will have a two-tone color finish. The roofing will be of barrel tile. The applicant proposes four (4) distinct footprints— Plans A, B, C, and D—and.a reverse footprint of Plan C for a total of five (5) footprints. Plans A and D will be one-story, while the others will be two-story. Each house will have an articulated footprinttfloor plan and profile with a variety of movement .in the.wall planes and roof lines. Each house will have a front entrance comprised of either an enclosed courtyard or a covered porch. A decorative trellis is included with Plans A and C. There will also be details such as a well-defined decorative molding (Le. a "belly band") on Plans B and C, decorative trim around the windows, wrought iron accent features, and decorative garage doors. With the exception of Plan A, each house will have achimney. The plotting of each house will be at a distance from the street that exceeds the minimum 37-foot setback requirement for the Development District of the project site. The garage doors for Plan B will not face the street. For Plan.D, the doors of one of the garages will face the street, while the door of the other garage will face the side yard. The number of available footprints will comply with Table 17.122.010-1 of the Development Code. However, the number of elevations do not comply. Per the Development Code, two (2) elevations per footprint are required. To address this, staff has provided several solutions (see Major Issues below). Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Ma es The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. Per Table 17.122.010-1 of the Development Code, two.(2) elevations per footprint are required. The following is recommended in order for the project to comply with this requirement: a. Plan B - Revise either "Unit 2" or "Unit 4" so that they are further differentiated from each other and provide a distinct architectural design theme as follows: incorporate decorative stackstone veneer on the front and rear elevations (of either Unit 2 or Unit 4); use a different Item C-39 • DRC AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00914—JWDA December 2, 2014 Page 3 color scheme; and vary the trim and details around the windows and on the second floor decks. b. Plan C - Revise either "Unit 3" or "Unit 5" so that they are further differentiated from each other and provide a distinct architectural design theme as follows: remove the decorative stackstone veneer from all elevations (of either Unit 3 or Unit 5); use a different color scheme; and vary the trim and details around the windows and on the second floor decks. 2. All Plans (with stone veneer) — Increase the quantity of stone veneer on the front elevations and add more-stone veneer to the rear elevations to match the quantity of stone veneer that is applied to the front elevations. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Plan Types A and B — Per Section 17.120.030(A)(1)(c) of the Development Code, at the primary building entrance provide changes in roof-form, building massing, additional architectural articulation to clearly identify the entry location." To accomplish this, shift the fascia of the tower elements at the entry area of each of these plan types that are on the same plane as, or are • behind, the primary wall plane of the house, forward (westward) so they are more prominent. 2. All Plans — The amount of hardscape in front of each house is excessive and there is no interruption between the driveway paving and the wall plane of the west elevation of each house. To address this, provide landscaping in the area immediately adjacent to the wall plane at the front of each house. Staff Recommendation: Staff, recommends that the applicant provide the requisite number of elevations and distinct architectural themes as required per the Code. If the applicant revises the number of elevations to the satisfaction of the Committee, subject to the revisions noted above, staff recommends that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. If the applicant does not revise the project to the satisfaction of the Committee, the project will be required to return to the Design Review Committee for review. . Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner. Mike Smith Members Present: Item C-40 • STAFF REPORT , PANNING DEPAIrI' TENT L Date: November 10, 2010 RANCHO. To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18391 - LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN - A request to subdivide a property comprised of 3 parcels into 6 parcels .in the Low (L) Residential District located approximately 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court - APN: 0201-182-36`, 37, and 38. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION'.- A. ESCRIPTION.-A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-.Famil.y Residence; Low (L) Residential District South - Single-Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District East - Single-Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District West - Single-Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District B'. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential North - Low Residential South- Low Residential East. - Low Residential West - Low Residential C. Site.Characteristics: The project site is comprised of three (3) parcels with combined dimensions of approximately 659 feet (north to south) by approximately 178 feet (east to west) and an area of approximately 122,000 square feet (2.8 acres), located approximately 200 feet south of the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court on the east side of WinchesterCourt (Exhibit B): The site is partially developed with a single-family residence: There are several trees throughout the site. To the north, south, and west are single-family residences, while to the north there was a single-family residence that was recently demolished. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District. The subject property slopes north to south. The elevation at the north side is approximately 1,783 feet. At the south side, the elevation is generally approximately 1,767 feet but, because of a. significant change in slope, at the south property line of the site, the elevation is approximately 1,755 feet. ANALYSIS: • A. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 6 lots for a single-family residential development (Exhibit D); the applicant does not intend to construct the homes at this time. The single-family residence and accessory structures will be removed. All lots will comply with the EXHIBIT K Item C-41 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBT718391 —LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 2 development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in the Development Code. Individual lot areas will range between 10,270 square feet to 20,.147 square feet(which are well in excess of the minimum of 7,200 square feet with a minimum average of 8,000 square feet), the depth of each lot will be at least 178 feet, and the width of each lot will be an average of at least 65 feet (Exhibit G). All of the lots will be conventional in design and will mirror the lots of the subdivision directly across the street(Related file: Tract 16421). Access to the project site will be via Winchester Court. The street was constructed with Tract 16421 but unfinished public right-of- way improvements—including pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter-on the east side of the street are missing and will be completed at the time this project site is developed with homes. The proposed grading will be similar to the subdivision across the street, and the proposed finished pads of each lot will be stepped to follow the slope of Winchester Court. A series of combination screen/retaining walls between most of the lots except at Lots 1 and 2 will be required. Each of these walls will have an overall height that will exceed the maximum of 6 feet. To address this, the applicant has submitted an application for a Minor Exception (Related file: Minor Exception DRC2010-00113). There will not be any walls in excess of 6 feet along the east property line shared with the residences to the east. Another atypical characteristic of the subdivision is the significant grade difference of approximately 7 feet between Lot 6 and the subdivision to the south. Typically, the applicant would be required to reduce such grade differences to as close to zero as possible, but the finished surface elevation of Winchester Court, the sewer line beneath it, and the finished grades of the property to the west and east preclude this option. Therefore, when a house is built on Lot 6, that house will be situated higher than the residence to the south. B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Lions Center East located at 9161 Base Line Road on August 9, 2010. Several individuals from the surrounding community attended. None of them had any specific objections to the project. However, there were concerns about impacts related to construction activity including fugitive dust and noise. The attendees acknowledged that these impacts were a common characteristic of construction but wanted it minimized. Staff stated to the attendees the applicant's proposal does not include house product so grading would be limited to rough grading (if any)and there would not be any construction activity associated with this application. Nevertheless, there are mitigation measures that must be followed by developers to control dust and noise. Measures to control dust will include the use of a water truck to stabilize soil and prevent it from becoming airborne, ceasing construction during strong winds, and a variety of barriers to prevent water runoff. The principal means to control noise will be to limit the hours of construction. Staff also noted to the attendees that in the event such measures were not being followed, they could contact the City (or other agencies like the Air Quality Management District) to investigate the problem and, if there is a violation, require the applicant to correct the violation. There were also questions about the scope of the public improvements. Staff indicated the developer would be required to provide all improvements. C. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee (Addington and James) reviewed the application on September 14, 2010. The Committee accepted the proposal and recommends approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. Item C-42 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18391 —LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 3 D. Design Review Committees: The Design Review Committee.(Munoz and. Granger) reviewed the application on September 14, 2010 (Exhibit F). The Committee accepted,the proposal noting that the overall design was typical , and nearly identical, to the subdivision across the 'street. The Committee recommends approval to' the Planning Commission. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval: E. Demolition of the Existind Residence: To ensure that the demolition of the existing residence would not result in the loss of a culturally or historically important resource, staff requested that the applicant research the background of the house. According to a report submitted by Joe A. Ramos, an architect, the structure has no cultural or historical significance(Exhibit H). F. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA') and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential.environmental effects of the project. Based'on the findings contained in that Initial Study, staff determined that, with the imposition.of mitigation measures related to biological resources, geology and soils, hydrology and. water quality, noise, air quality and cultural resources, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, staff provided public notice of the public, comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. • CORRESPONDENCE:. This item was.advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-f60t radius•of the project site. No comments have been received. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Respectfully submitted, Jam. R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:MSlge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial.Photo Exhibit C. - Site.Utilizafiori Map Exhibit D Site PlaNTentative Tract Map SUBTT18391 Exhibit E' - Grading..Plan and Sections Exhibit F - Design Review Committee Action Comments, dated September 14, 2010 • Exhibit G - Table 17.08.040-13 Basic Development Standards Exhibit H - Analysis of Existing Residence with Photographs Exhibit I Initial Study Parts 1 and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM18391 Itam r—Al • RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP S.UBTT18391, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A PROPERTY COMPRISED OF'3 PARCELS INTO 6 PARCELS IN THE LOW(L)RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE ON THE EAST SIDE OF WINCHESTER COURT;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APNS: 0201-182-36,- 37, AND-38. A. Recitals, 1. Land Development Design Corporation, on behalf of Amin Khan, filed an application for the. approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391,as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of November2010,the,Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and.concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby-found,determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during.the above-referenced public hearing on November 10,2010, including written and oral staff reports,togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to three (3) parcels with combined dimensions of approximately 659 feet (north to south) by approximately 178 feet (east to west) and an area of approximately 122,000 square feet(2.8 acres), located approximately 200 feet south of the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court on the east side of Winchester Court; b. To the north, south, and west are single-family residences,while to the north there was a recently demolished single-family residence; and C. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low(L)Residential District;and d. The site is partially developed with a single-family residence. Vegetation on-site includes short grasses, shrubs and trees; and . e. The application contemplates the subdivision of the subject parcel into six (6) lots for a single-family residential development. The applicant does not intend to construct the.homes at this time;and f. Individual lot areas will range between 10,270 square feet to 20,216 square feet with an • average of 12,697 square feet(these dimensions exceed the minimum of 7,200 square feet with a minimum average of 8,000 square feet), the.depth of each lot will beat least 100 feet,and the width of each lot will be at least 65 feet; and EXHIBIT L Item C-44 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 —LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 2 g. As the applicant has not submitted any applications to develop the site, any proposals for construction of residential structures on these parcels will be subject to review and action by the Planning Commission at a later date. These parcels will remain vacant until then; and h. All lots will have access to a public right-of-way. Access to the project site will be via Winchester Court. The street was constructed with Tract 16421 but unfinished public right-of-way improvements—including pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter-on the east side of the street are missing and will be completed at the time this project site is developed with homes. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,and any applicable specific plans; b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; e. The Tentative Tract Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems; f. The design of the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(°CEQA°)and the City's local CEQA Guidelines,City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination,a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter,City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds:(i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA;and(ii)that,based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Itpm C-45 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 —LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 • Page 3 C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753.5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole,that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. The site has been previously disced and weed abated. Based on substantial evidence,the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753.5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753.5.) 5. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration,Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission • hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions,attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Deoartment 1) Approval is for the subdivision of three(3)parcels(APN: 0201-182-36, 37,and 38) of approximately 122,000 square feet (2.8 acres) located approximately 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court into six (6)separate parcels. 2) Development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Low (L) Residential District as described in Table 17.08.040-Basic Development Standards. 3) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the existing single-family residence, and associated structures and improvements shall be demolished and removed from the project site. 4) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, all lots shall be rough graded to include building pads and interim improvements (for example, drainage) as deemed necessary by the City. 5) Prior to construction, all future homes and associated improvements shall require the review and approval by the City and the issuance of applicable building permits by the Building and Safety Department. The site plotting and • architecture of these homes(and accessory structures)shall require the review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior to Planning Director and/or Planning Commission action. 6) All setback lines shall be shown on the Final Map. Itam r—W; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 —LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 4 7) Double-wall/fence conditions shall be eliminated,if possible. The applicant shall coordinate with the property owners to the east any activity relating to new wall construction along the common property lines. 8) Prior to the removal of any trees on the property, the applicant shall submit a Tree Removal permit and fee for review and approval by the Planning Director or Planning Commission. Building and Safety(Grading) 1} Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit as part of the grading and drainage plan submittal package an updated topographic survey map showing the additional grading which was performed on the project site without permit(s). 2) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard-lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 3) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s)allowing work on the adjacent property. 4) Unpermitted grading activities have occurred on the subject parcel. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall include a topographic map of the subject parcel(s) showing the additional unpermitted earth placement. 5) Section E-E shows the existing retaining wall south of the southerly property line of Lot 6 retaining a level backfill. This wall is owned and maintained by the adjacent property owner. Section E-E and the plan view proposes a 2:1 slope to be placed against this existing retaining wall. Prior to issuance of a grading permit,provide preliminary calculations showing the existing retaining wall may withstand the additional soil pressure of the proposed 2:1 slope without failing, or provide an altemate design along the south property line. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized,or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also Item C-47 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO: 10-51 SUBTT18391 — LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 • Page 5 conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall.meet or exceed performance standards noted in. SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions:. • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site.haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil • during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD.and Regional Water Quality Control Board[RWQCB])daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PMio) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM;o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 1+o.„ r_AQ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 —LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 6 10) Projects shall be developed under the proposed 2010 General Plan Update implementing the following measures, derived from the SCAQMD's AQMP, where feasible, in order to reduce criteria air pollutant emissions, primarily related to vehicular travel and energy. Potential measures for consideration in future projects include: • Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. • Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. • Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. • All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. • All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 11) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445,Wood Burning Devices.Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) Trees that are removed shall be replaced on a one-to-one basis with a minimum 15-gallon sized tree. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the- archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments,using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. itam r_aa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.'10-51 SUBTT18391 — LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 7 •. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant,. important, and unique prehistoric resources., following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report; documenting the inventory, evaluation; and proposed mitigation. of resources within the. project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the. San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) if any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include,but not be limited to., the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor,trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time ® during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make. the discovery; the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify,and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino Country Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage.public streets shall be swept according,to a schedule established.by • the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM1.0 emissions from the site during such episodes. +,.— r cn t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 —LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 8 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers(approved by SCAQMD and RW QCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in the grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to.control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b)An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction,to remove pollutants,street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by CTK, Inc., to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas,including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP,including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The W QMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits,the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Item C-51 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 - LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10,2010 • Page 9 Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1} Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours;however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. • 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2010. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE -0F RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: • Ja V s R. Troye , AICP, Sec etary Itcm r—G7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 10-51 SUBTT18391 —LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 10 I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of November 2010, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: WIMBERLY ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE iron,r—S* COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • DEPARTMENT STA.NDARD .00N ,D '1.T10NS PROJECT#: SUBTT18391 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP APPLICANT: LAND-DEVELOPMENT'DESING CORPORATION FOR.AMIN KHAN 200 FEET SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE, EAST SIDE.OF WINCHESTER—APN: 0201-182- LOCATION: 361 37 AND 38. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 4,77-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: *A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,officers,or employees.,because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval: The applicant shall, reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or . employees, for any, Court costs and attomeys fees which the City; its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action.The City may,at its sole discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition: 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 10-51, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shallbe included on the plans (full size). The sheet(t)are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required tobewet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing.- a) earing:a) Mitigated Negative Declaration-$2, 060.25 X B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission; unless a complete final map.is filed with the Engineering.Services Department within 3 years from the date Of the approval. • SC-12-08 1 (:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGC0MM\2010 Res&Stf Rpt\SUBTT18391StdCond 11-10.doc ta....., f CA Project No.SUBTT18391 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _I I site plans,architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations, 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fre Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building,etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all / J other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall I I condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify,by mail,all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project's perimeter. D. Landscaping 1. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in I I_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110,and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting,and trimming methods. E. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of / ! implementing said measures,including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash,letter of credit,or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of$567 prior to the issuance of building permits,guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 2 I:IPLANNINGIFINALIPLNGCOMM12010 Res 81 Stf Rpt\SUBTT18391StdCond 11-10.doc 14..r.. r Cc 1 Project No.SUBTT18391 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2710, •FOR COMPLIANCE.WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL.REVIEW(3) F. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot.Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets, .detached)including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules,and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans,including isometrics,underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning;and g. Planning Department Project Number(SUBTT18391)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations,energy conservation calculations, and.a soils report. /! Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to �/ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. ! / 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements.. G. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number(SUBTT18391). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes,and all other applicable codes,ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition,the applicant sha11 pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include,but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,Transportation Development Fee,Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 3 IAPLANNINGIFINALIPLNGCOMM12010 Res &Stf Rpt1SUBTT18391StdCond 11-10.doc Project No.SUBTT18391 Completion Date 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday —/ through Saturday,with no construction on Sunday or holidays. H. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances / considering use,area,and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturees"high wind"instructions. I. Grading SEE ATTACHED APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _I I community trails,public paseos,public landscape areas,street trees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities(cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails,etc.)shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from street centerline): 20 total feet on Winchester Court �- 3. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or / /— noted on the final map. 4. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the / final map. K. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos,landscaped / areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include,but are not limited to,curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks,street lights, and street trees. 4 1:1PLANNING0NALIPLNGC0MM12010 Res&Stf Rpt1SUBTT18391StdCond 11-10.doc i+am r-r%7 Project No..SUBTT18391 Completion:Date 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.3.7.010,.no person shall make connections from a source 1_I of energy;fuel or power to any building or structure .which is regulated.by technical codes and for which :a permit is required unless; in addition to any and all other codes, regulations. and ordinances,all improvements required by these conditions of development approval.haye been completed and accepted by the City Council,.except:.that in developments containing more than . one building, structure or unit, the development may.have energy connections.made in.equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval,as deterrrmined by the City Engineer, provided.that,reasonable,safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures, or units be connected to energy sources prior.to completion and. acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval:. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk. Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trait Other Winchester Court X X X X X X n!a I nla n/a n!a Notes: (a)Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)Pavement reconstruction and overlays.will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked,an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction`. a. Street improvement plans,including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil • Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed.to the.satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work. being,performed in public right-df-way,, fees shall be paid and a construction peirmit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.. C. Pavement striping,marking,traffic signing,street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and _I_I interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City 1 I_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer: e. Existing City roads requiring. construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _! adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit.shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the.construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer-. f. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards,except for single-family residential lots. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 5 I:IPLANNINGIFINALIPLNGCOMM12010 Res&Stf Rpt1SUBTT18391StdCond 11-10.doc Itpm C.-58 Project No.SUBTT18391 Completion Date 6. Install street trees per.City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed _l f legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans.. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing size Qty. Winchester Pyrus kawakami Evergreen Pear 20 ft. 15 Gal 7 O.C. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting,an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments,as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 7. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the I I issuance of building permits. L. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. M. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map / ! approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the / / property from adjacent areas. 3. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 4. Any catch basin in a sump condition shall be designed as two separate independent catch basins and provide for(2)Q100 intercepts for each to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. N. Improvement Completion 1. if the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed bythe Developer and the City will be required. 6 1:1PLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM12010 Res&Stf Rpt1SUBTT18391StdCond 11-10.doc Project No.SUBTT18391 Completion Date O.. Utilities 1. Provide separate utilityservices to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water;gas, electric power,. telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _!_7 3. Water and 'sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the % /_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD);Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map'approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured: from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. P. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City,covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation,prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits,a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if • at least 50% of all wastes. generated: during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills; and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days,following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 3. Provide a copy of the Final Water Quality Management Plan with submittal of Grading Plans to Building and Safety: WQMP and Grading Plans are subject to review by the Building Official. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 7 I:IPLANNINGIFINALIPLNGCOMM12010 Res&Stf Rpt\SUBTT18391StdCond 11-10.doc City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18391 . Building&Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • "r - ;: T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 GRADING COMMITTEE PROJECT REPORT&RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS. Project No.:: SUBTT18391„ Type: 6-Lot Residential Subdivision Location: Winchester Court South of Wilson Street Planning Department: MICHAEL SMITH APN:. 0201-182-036, 037, 038 Meeting Date: September 14, 2010 By:. Matthew Addington Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: xxx No: If NO, see COMMENTS below. PRELIMINARY: GRC: September 14, 2010 By: Matthew Addington. FINAL: PC Meeting: November 10, 2010 BVeon Note: Building and Safety— Grading will review and cture submittals for this project. A) STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. • 1) Grading of the subject property shall be- in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading. Standards, and accepted grading practices.. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the. approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3) A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist. and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4) The final Grading and. Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where_ improvements being proposed will generate 50. cubic yards: or more of combined cut and fll .. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6) The applicant shall comply with -the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control • Measures. and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 1:\BUILDING%PERMITSISUSTT183911SUBTT78391 Grading Committee Project Report to PC.20101.110.doc 1 of 4 1+-- P G 9 City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18391 �r Building &Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. A Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 Y T:(909)477-2710 F:(909)477-2711 7) If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8) A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9) it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 13) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 14) Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 15) The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16) The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading. bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 17) This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 18) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit'. 19) Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\SUBTr18391\SUBT718391 Grading Committee Project Report to PC,20101110.doc 2of4 i+om r_w) ' y City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18391 Building&Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • -�. x T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; • iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 20) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. B) COMMENTS - The following items shall be corrected / completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: 1) Please note that at this conceptual level a review of the accessibility access is not performed. It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet all accessibility requirements. 2) Please show the method of sewer service to each lot. 3) Section E-E shows the existing retaining wall south of the southerly property line of Lot 6 retaining a level backfill. This wall is owned and maintained by the adjacent • property owner. Section E-E and the plan view proposes a 2:1 slope to be placed against this existing retaining wall. Please provide preliminary calculations showing I:\BUILDINGIPERMITSISUBTT183911SUBTT18391 Grading Committee Project Report to PC,20101110.doc 3 of 4 Ito►„r•_til City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18391 Building &Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 the existing retaining wall may withstand the additional soil pressure of the proposed 2:1 slope without failing, or provide an alternate design along the south property line. C) SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit as part of the grading and drainage plan submittal package an updated topographic survey map showing the additional grading which was performed on the project site without permit(s). 2) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 3) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 4) Unpermitted grading activities have occurred on the subject parcel. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall include a topographic map of the subject parcel(s) showing the additional unpermitted earth placement. D) WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) A Non-Category Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)was approved by the Engineering Department on August 27, 2007 1:1BUILDINGIPERMITSNSUB7T183911SUSTT18391 Grading Committee Project Report to PC,20101110.doc 4 of 4 Itpm C-64 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS October 27, 2010 Khan-Amin CTK, Inc. E/S of Winchester Rd. South of Wilson Ave. (6) SFR Subdivision SUBTT1839.1 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Fire ;hydrants shall be located in accordance with the 2007 California Fire Code, RCFPD Ordinance FD46 and RCFPD Standard 5=10 (formally 9-8). Submit plans to CVWD and FCS for review/ FSC-2 Fire Flow ® The required fire flow for this project is 2,000 gallons per minute at a.minimum residual pressure of 20- pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with 2007 Fire Code, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinance. FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire.District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public 'fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan.Submittal Procedure.in Standard #5-10. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any • combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fre Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of Itom(-_FS the public water system by CCWD. Fre Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #5-1 (formally 9-7). All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fre Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION— Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga- Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga f MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act Section 29091 and 21092 of the.Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391 Public Review Period Closes: November 10, 2010 Project Name: Project Applicant: Kevin Richer Project Location(also see attached map): Located near the southeast corner of Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court-APN: 0201-182-36, -37, and-38. Project Description: A request to subdivide a property comprised of 3 parcels into 6 parcels in the Low (L) Residential District. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: • The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. November 10. 2010 • Date of Determination Adopted By itcm r—r%7 RESOLUTION NO. 15-29 ® A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00914, A REVIEW OF 6 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES THAT WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION IN THE LOW(L)RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED ABOUT 200 FEET SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE ON THE EAST SIDE OF WINCHESTER COURT;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT.THEREOF—APN: 0201-182-36, -37, AND-38. A. Recitals. 1. JWDA filed an application for the issuance of Development Review DRC2013-00914,as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of April 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the ,above-referenced public hearing on April 22,2015, including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to three (3) parcels with combined dimensions of approximately 659 feet (north to south) by approximately 178 feet (east to west) and an area of approximately 122,000 square feet (2.8 acres), located approximately 200 feet south of the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court on the east side of Winchester Court; b. To the north,south,and west are single-family residences,while to the north there was a recently demolished single-family residence; and a. . The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District; and b. The site is partially developed with a single-family residence. Vegetation on-site includes short grasses, shrubs and trees; and C. The proposal is to construct a single-family residence on each lot of a 6-lot subdivision (Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391),that-Was previously approved by the Planning Commission on November 10, 2010, for a total of six (6) single-family residences; and Itam ['_FiR PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-29 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00914—JWDA April 22, 2015 Page 2 d. The floor area of the houses (including the garages) will range between 4,288 square feet (Plan A) to 5,389 square feet(Plan D); and e. There will be four (4) distinct footprints— Plans A, B, C, and D — and a reverse footprint of Plan C, for a total of five (5) footprints; and f. Two (2)'of the houses (Plans A and D) will be one-story while the houses on the remainder of the lots will be two-story. This equates to 33%of the lots having single-story houses which will comply with Section 17.122.010 of the Development Code that requires a minimum of 25%of all single-family detached units within single-family residential development consisting of four (4) or more units to be single-story; and g. The architecture of each house will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code. Each house will have an articulated footprint/floor plan and profile with a variety of movement in the wall planes and roof lines; and h. There will be a single architectural theme that incorporates the form/massing and details derived from Italian architecture. The use of a single theme is.consistent with the subdivision located directly to the west(on the opposite side of Winchester Court); and i. All lots will have access to a public right-of-way. Access to the project site will be via Winchester Court. The street was constructed with Tract 16421 but unfinished public right-of- way improvements—including pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter-on the east side of the street are missing and will be completed as part of this project. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan. The proposal is to construct a residential subdivision with a density of 2—4 dwelling units per acre. The underlying General Plan designation is Low Residential. b. The proposed development is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct six(6) single-family residences within a subdivision of six(6)lots. The underlying zoning designation of the project site is Low(L) Residential. C. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed land use is single-family residential, and is consistent with the single-family residential land uses within the vicinity of the project site and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding it is Low(L)Residential District.. d. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development meets the technical standards such as setbacks, lot coverage, building height, and the design standards that apply to architecture, use of materials, and massing/form, and the policies of the Planning Commission and the City. Itpm r—f,4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-29 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00914—JWDA April 22, 2015 • Page 3 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines,the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 10,2010 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; no new important information shows the project will have.new or more severe impacts than previously considered; and no additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. There have been no substantial changes to the projector the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Negative Declaration. The associated tentative tract map was for the purpose of developing the property with single-family residences. Therefore, the construction and operational characteristics of the project are as anticipated. The tentative tract map is substantially the same as was approved. There are no significant physical changes to the map such as the layout of the lots, grading, and fence/wall heights. Conditions on-site and on adjacent properties are generally the same as they were when the map was reviewed and approved. The site is surrounded by residential structures/uses and no significant new development has occurred in the general vicinity. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to • reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning ® Commission held on the 22nd day of April 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: I+cm ('_7n PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-29 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00914—JWDA APO!24 2015 Page 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval t r= • jo GUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2013-00914 Project Name: 6 SFR///WINCHESTER Location: -020118236-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 1. All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391 shall apply (including all Mitigation Measures of the associated Mitigated Negative Declaration). 2. Development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Low(L) Residential District as described in Table 17.36.010-1 of the Development Code. 3. The molding along the top of the stone or brick veneer wainscots shall also be stone or brick, not foam. 4. The removal of any trees within the project site is subject to the. review and approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-000706, and subject to conditions of approval that may require the replacement of the each tree that is removed with another tree (on a one-to-one basis) in addition to • any trees that are required as described in the Development Code. 5. The design, materials, and finish of all exterior balusters at the balconies, decks, and windows (where applicable) shall be uniform on, and consistent with the design theme of, each house. 6. Model homes shall require the review of a separate Temporary Use Permit (Model Home) and fee . prior to the submittal of documents for plan check and construction. Note: Parking in the street.will not be permitted for this purpose. A temporary off-street parking area that complies with all applicable parking requirements will be required and must be shown on the plans for this permit. 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees .may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action'but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 9. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 ® days of the date of project approval. Printed:4/15/2015 www.CityofRC.us i+nm r__79 Project#: DRC2013-00914 Project Name: 6 SFR///WINCHESTER Location: -020118236-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 10. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 11. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 12. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 13. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 14. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD)Standards. 15. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan 16. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 17. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the. City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 18. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 19. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 20. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. Printed:4/15/2015 www.QtyofRC.us Page 2 of 7 Item r-7� Project#: DRC2013-00914 Project Name: 6 SFR N/WINCHESTER • Location: -020118236=0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 21. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 22. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 23. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 24. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 25. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. • 26. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 27. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 28. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 29. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 30. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft.. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and • vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. Printed:4/15/2015 www.City0fRC.us Page 3 of 7 item r'_7A Project#: DRC2013-00914 Project Name: 6 SFR N WINCHESTER Location: -020118236-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 31. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 32. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 33. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 34. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. 35. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. B. Enaineering Services Department 1. Revise Drawing 2348 for Tract 18391 to add curbside drain outlets and to adjust drive approaches, street trees, etc. as needed. E. Grading Section 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/15/2015 Page 4 of 7 Item r-7� Project#: DRC2013-00914 Project Name: 6 SFR///WINCHESTER ® Location: -020118236-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design. storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. • 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11.. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 12. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 13. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 14. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed:4/15!2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 7 I+cm r--7r, Project#: DRC2013-00914 Project Name: 6 SFR///WINCHESTER Location: -020118236-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 15. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, . the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 16. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 17. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 18. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 19. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 20. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 21. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 22. If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. Printed:4/15/2015 www.QtyofRC.us Page 6 of 7 i+n_r 77 Project#: DRC2013-00914. Project Name: 6 SFR III WINCHESTER Location: -020118236-0000 Project Type: Design'Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 23. If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration pits to the City of Rancho Cucamonga ,Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared. for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 24. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 25. Prior to issuance of a wall. permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 26. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 27. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing ® work on the adjacent property. 28. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 29. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared .for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. • Printed:4/15/2015 www.QtyofRC.us Page 7 of 7 Itam r-7R RANCHO Development Review U(:AMON(;A �AL'FORNIA D RC2013-00914 A review of 6 single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a previously approved subdivision in the Low Residential District located about 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court - APNs : 0201 - 182-36 , -37 , and -38 . r• t, A tA.- ' ®r � ' AI� 1� ✓0 ��i rr.:—._a c, ..-tea, - ,; Winchester Court , Mt- It IV rl 1 u? + p �. .• � � fid` _ r P �= - Wilson Avenue - e ar of the prof site is 2.8 acre' 1`78 feet (east to 659 feel I(north to so .ith) ^x7w q iApx IN • 'M 1 "C 'h an o , reiect r ate:••:: ,.��. , _ • _ k Y - - 1.' }, � r- '1 ^— -�;. - f P';• � 'i :. � ` ` �j' ' �' If of .;S.S V�' AL.. m �' A► Wilson Avenue 0 U CD N CD L V C J Project Site NORTHi WIN RANCHO Project Description CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA This proposal is in conjunction with a previously approved subdivision of the property, Tentative Tract Map 18391 , that was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on November 10 , 2010 . i RON Project Description RANCHO (continued) Cti(AMONGA cALIFORMA • There will be four distinct footprints — Plans A, B , C, and D — and a `reverse' footprint of Plan C, for a total of five footprints; • Two of the houses will be one-story while the houses on the remainder of the lots will be two-story consistent with Planning Commission policy requiring that 25 percent of a subdivision be comprised of one-story houses; aa { • The architecture of each house will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code. Project Description RANCHO (continued) UCAMONGA CALIFORNIA • Each house will have an `articulated' footprint/floor plan and profile with a variety of movement in the wall planes and roof lines. Each house will have a front entrance comprised of either an enclosed courtyard or a covered porch ; • The architecture of each home will have matching architectural treatment on all elevations (commonly referred to as 360-degree architecture) Pi aius.mn e - �iii\ _ 0059 \ .•-_ — _ { y 00'59' y' - - "r 0059 - OPS9 f _ ._ _ .. _— __...... w-♦ 9'�uz xnu9wrvu 9 avao¢ � n ra 00 no n'o .f' iooay .a , t i 14`j` 4 �`� •`� 9 xv _ K'1 '�` a I4•{7 « f T I_ y -t- s '. ,i— "����r srnEET 6JR5 del C WINCHESTER COURT 57R ET 6-Fa 'ACC Lt.RB s � 5 S-REEET' - - ' NORTH I ATE PLAN G< , T i i r +j z \ 9 Y 4777 I/[I 771 ��-i a I v s 7 U " Unit 1 , Type A 4288 SF ------------- r a 'A•P M a f r � WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION �j a s. - }„ EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 6 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE UNIT 1 (TYPE "A") N!NCNESTERCCURT IZi' fia' 2Y'-l' ♦ ♦ —p i i E ♦ l f_ I un I Q a Mm — --------------------- �V o i ewwx R I i i i / Unit 2, Type B 4690 SF -* ■I� .,=.11��I.111� �` -�iu{n � � � - IIS ELEVATIONEAST • ' ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 6 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY '�� L Illi �I_j ■ �_ ■ Imo _- � ��.- �'II - _ ��i HOUSE R4 R-0' R-0" b41' nee np �- J 4CI iil'. ni i „ I , I I ” I' P4pCli r. l. , n I CAVI I4 1 4 YIII bYM r Ir M b 4 •• \ 4RFYRu vi I I—I � L._I ' h O / I i� _ I 1 r I r 2L1� _______ _ I r. Q 1D A. uin 4 1 I / \ `•• _ r I •. I , 4 ' 8 {III .IL' 6 .; 9II ' 541' YA' Yb' D-Y / Unit 3, Type C 5246 F r ELEVATIONEAST • ELEVATION iii III WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION rra Jsw• n-e• r" aj'-r r 0 t ------------- tF7fl — y I u 'v.�_ Jl Y l<' r—i— a M l \ r c sr'o• / AL' Unit 4, Type B 4690 F r r 'rk tt . i It 11=41 ISI I I 11�� �I� ��I�I�� �- 111 LA1 I�r Il._:•�b-7 EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION WEST ,�'�I ',- �I,� I� _ _---fir_ i1•I 1■�:�.}w�_ I-�� I i .moi- �s I♦11 r - r � ��� itr�i r ' ��� I� 1�1 111111 .,I 1 1111 ®I i��11 - - I elllbl1111 r ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION D1'A' Ki' R4 M41' ?fi' rr � „ p " _ ______________________ _ -------------- ---------------------- 13 i y m iii IN4 Cy Wt+ � � l�.. �,�• � � ° I I n ' ; ______ _____________ __' 54. 5-Al. Unit 5, Type C 5246 SF ..- _ ...Ir.� •1'�ui 31 C•'11 F•.I'�i�t It i; '�/d eii�'� { " tL°' � _ .. VY- t.� .�. i qr I / R PII na•Vr II I{ •�• �a rr\r ��4 j 1�ia.....-r. ` �I �j L•J � LJ ... � ,ilt����11 . � � I"I � ,�ll " *. IIII •I� y. , � .fI:SR Ile :!:1�%ur, - cir• —�� {..i r.,:1y,,.�1i�.`•<e i!'u�G:' .�• _,uC=-: .7t.••I::.: ' -Ii��Jr{.al!'v,>3utt.. ELEVATIONkL EAST • • ELEVATION WEST .;f'Rlrla t ' •h .�ONaaDI X71. i12i�'t31�1.--. � rtl .\ la rP�II+ Ila a IFIn�fK r.ai *t1 Lr\ k + '. I X11 �r6i1 i.�ip�. n ��•; .1 \ntl l.i.y u1�1� p� . :• 111 Irl . PEgj. 1`r. o�llY ti. � .G �iiF.�r:�l� / IIlli/Ci(I{{i,.IS�•�N• �in%�aS::��1a£i���e� /L �! {II JI i �.f.a r_!{{h.r1�IG.A!;,r.. � w7:I. ir�A11 �. If:1 i• alFl..f-� F s. r t. t ./ ..I;u, ..•Ir'E.L.. �� �� ' .;rl�`:�Ir�_ _�� _ -el.:licnq`pl%. _ ELEVATION • ELEVATION VIA mw 2-7 ---------------- - 11 0 rT All A �: ------------------ ` 4 i i i o. i /l i neve✓is% a i Unit 6, Type D 5389 SF � �L ELEVATIONEAST • ' ELEVATION ELEVATIONI Now- TT WEST • ELEVATION ' • • Environmental Assessment RANCHO C UC:AMONGA C,UIFORNIA • Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 10 , 2010 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map 18391 . • Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Section 15162 , no subsequent or supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. Environmental Assessment RANCHO (continued) UCAMONGA CALIFORNIA • No substantial changes are proposed to the project or circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; • Staff finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration . F l`i i Public Notification RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA • This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Bulletin newspaper; • The property was posted ; • Notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site ; • No correspondence or comments have been received in response to the public notifications . MIR POW i Conclusion RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNLA Staff Recommends Approval of: Development Review DRC2013-00914 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions.