Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-05-27-Agenda Packet-PC-HPC r THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKSHOP OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 27, 2015 - 7:00 PM's Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center ***RAINS ROOM*** 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Wimberly_ Vice Chairman Oaxaca_ Munoz_ Howdyshell_ FletcherFir _ II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS -- -JI This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,making loud noises,or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. FIF� III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW ORC2015-00155—MARC HOMES, LLC-A request for a Planning Commission Workshop review of a conceptual site plan for a high density, single-family residential development comprised of 39 units on a vacant parcel of about 4.7 acres within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Park(OPK)District, O Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street; APN: 1100-031-01 and -07. (: J PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP r MAY 27, 2015 'AwcHO Page 2 uc�uoN IF- IV. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee,hereby certify that a true,accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 21, 2015,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." . Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m.. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). �r PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP -0 . MAY 279 2015 ANCHo Page 3 ucu�ox Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us VicinityMap Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Workshop MAY 2712015 j U � C C i? to m t j 1 0 C a = Q = 2 Y r j a m � � a g 19th St Base Line Bass Line J Church Church Foothill : Foothill N Arrow E C Arrow CZ c m j 8th P- i mCOOO 5thw A 4th ' _ _ +nth > Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chamber. 10500 Clvic Center DO, ' Item A: DRC2015-00155—MARC HOMES, LLC S STAFF REPORT ' PLANNING DiiPARTNIEN•r �- DATE: May 27, 2015 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2015-00155 - MARC HOMES, LLC' - A request for a Planning Commission Workshop review of a conceptual site plan .for a high density, single-family residential development comprised of 39 units on a vacant parcel of about 4.75 acres within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Park (OPK) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street - APN: 1100-031-01 and - 07. GENERAL: A. Pre-Application Review Process: The Pre-Application Review process is intended to promote quality development and to facilitate the Development Review process. Although • Pre-Application Review is not required, it allows an applicant to present schematic designs to the Planning Commission during the early stages of concept plan preparation, prior to formal application, and to receive broad, general comments and direction from the Planning Commission. The meeting is not a forum for debate, and no formal decision or vote is made. After the meeting, staff prepares minutes of the meeting, which are sent to the applicant. B. Site Description: The project site is irregular in shape and is comprised of two (2) parcels with a combined area of about 207,000 square feet (4.75 acres). The project site is located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street. The north parcel (APN: 1100-031-07), with an area of about 164,200 square feet (3.7 acres), is vacant, while the south parcel (APN: 1100-041-01), with an area of about 43,000 square feet (0.99 acre) is partially developed with two (2) buildings. The project site, because of its shape, has unequal dimensions - about 465 feet and 270 feet (east to west) along the north and south perimeter, respectively, and about 350 feet (north to south) and 600 feet (diagonally) along the west and east perimeter, respectively. To the north, west, and south of the project site are single-family residences. To the east is the 1-15 Freeway. Immediately to the northwest of the project site is the historic Cour House. The Cour House is not a part of this project. The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately 1,265 feet and 1,250 feet, respectively. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Site - Offices (part) and Vacant (part) — Office Professional (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan • North - Single-Family Residences — Low-Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Single-Family Residence — Office Professional (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan Item A-1 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT DRC2015-00155 — MARC HOMES, LLC May 27, 2015 Page 2 East - 1-15 Freeway West - Single-Family Residences — Mixed Use (MU) District, Victoria Planned Community D. General Plan Designations: Site - Office North - Low-Medium Residential South - Office East - Not Applicable West - Mixed Use Project Description: The applicant proposes to construct an innovative, compact single-family residential development comprised of thirty-nine (39) houses. The property will be subdivided into 39 lots (and additional lots as necessary for common areas). Three (3) floor plans are proposed with floor areas of 3,375 square feet (Unit Type A), 3,060 square feet (Unit Type B), and 2,289 square feet (Unit Type C). All of the houses will be two-story. The houses will have access to.either Etiwanda Avenue or Candlewood Street via alleys. These alleys, at 20 feet in width, will either connect to a private street or connect directly to the public streets. There will be two (2) rectangular landscaped courtyards that will function as a semi-private space. The courtyard near Candlewood Street will be about 147 feet by 55 feet (8,085 square feet in area), while the courtyard near the center of the project sitewill be about 102 feet by 50 feet (5,100 square feet in area). The front elevations of twenty (20) of the houses will face the public or private streets, while the front elevations of the remainder of the houses will face the courtyard areas. The architecture of the houses will follow a traditional theme and incorporate traditional materials such as wood siding and stone/brick veneer. The form and massing will be varied by movement in the wall and roof planes. Each house will have a prominent front entry. There will be porches and decks at the front elevations (and, in some cases, the side elevations) that are generous in size, and chimneys. Contrary to current practice in conventional subdivisions, the houses will be designed in a manner that results in the two-car garages being detached or located at the rear of the house and, therefore, "de- emphasized" relative to the front of the house. In all cases the garages are accessed via the alleys. Twenty-three (23) additional, dedicated parking stalls will be provided along the private street and the alley along the southeast perimeter of the site. Staff notes to the Planning Commission that the applicant's architect, Stefanos Polyzoides, of Moule & Polyzoides Architects and Urbanists, will be present at the meeting with full-sized colored plans and renderings to further elaborate on the concept and various details of the project. E. Formal Application Submittal Requirements: The following applications/documents (and associated fees)will be required at the time of formal submittal: 1. General Plan Amendment (to amend the land use designation from Office to Medium Residential): $12,140; 2. Specific Plan Amendment (to amend the zoning designation from Office Park (OPK) District to Medium (M) Residential District, and amend/establish development standards for the type of project that is proposed): $4,259; Item A-2 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT DRC2015-00155 — MARC HOMES, LLC May 27, 2015 Page 3 3. Tentative Tract Map: $14,420; 4. Development Review: $10,649; 5. Conditional Use Permit (for development along Etiwanda Avenue): $3,035; 6. Environmental Assessment, Initial Study - Part 1: $2,715; 7. Tree Removal Permit (only required if the removal of trees is proposed): $787; 8. Sign Permit (for Notice of Filing Signs): $120; 9. Deposit for two (2) Notice of Filing Signs (one per street frontage for supplemental public notification purposes): $613 per sign; and 10. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) (three separate fees): $220. F. Special Studies: Environmental studies, such as an air quality/greenhouse gas impact analysis, a biological resources assessment, a noise study, and a cultural resources report will be required to determine the construction and operational impacts and mitigation measures to address those impacts (if any) of the project. The specific studies that will be required will be identified at a follow-up consultation with the Planning Department. G. Technical Requirements: — The technical requirements from the Engineering Services Department, Building and Safety (Grading) Services Department, and Fire Construction • Services are attached. Respectf, submitted, Candyc urnett Planning Director CB:MS/Is Attachments: Technical Requirements/Engineering Services, Building and Safety (Grading) and Fire Construction Services Full-sized Set of Plans previously distributed under separate cover Item A-3 NOTE: This information is provided to assist in the preparation of a development package complete for processing. Additional information or comments may be necessary based upon a more thorough analysis during the Development Review Process. Incompleteness Items Additional information that must be subbmitted prior to finding the application complete and scheduling the project for the next stage in the Development Review Process: A.Planning Department P.1 None at this time. B.Engineering Services Department Betty Miller (909)477-2740 Ext.4021 betty.miller@cityofrc.us EA If this subdivision is intended to be detached single family residences on individual lots with private streets, the private streets shall be designed to public street standards. a. Local streets shall be 36 feet curb-to-curb in 60-foot rights-of-way with property line adjacent sidewalks on both sides and residential drive approaches. Provide curb, gutter, street trees and 5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlights. b. Streets shall terminate in cul-de-sacs. Intersections, including knuckles, shall be perpendicular. The minimum centerline radius is 300 feet. E.2 Candlewood is a Local Residential Street, so intersections shall be at least 200 feet apart. The absolute minimum with City Engineer approval is 125 feet, which could allow for alignment with and/or offsets from two existing intersections on the north side of Candlewood(one"T"intersection and one knuckle). E.3 Etiwanda is a Secondary Arterial, which requires at least 660 feet between intersections. To consider even one intersection, at the southernmost end of this property, the City Engineer would have to agree to a 460-foot separation from Candlewood and 580 feet from Miller. The unusual shape of the lot might be a justification. E.4 If the subdivision is done as detached condominiums, commercial drive approaches, at least 35 feet wide but no more than 50 feet, can be spaced 300 feet apart on Etiwanda Avenue. Northernmost driveway shall be at least 100 feet south of Candlewood Street; measured from the intersection ECR to the near edge of the driveway. a. If two driveways are proposed, they will need to be at the north and south edges of the property. Developer shall provide access easements in favor of existing properties to the north and south in lieu of additional future driveways on Etiwanda. b. Provide a 50-foot stacking distance from the face of curb to the near edge of parking stalls that are .perpendicular to driveway drive aisles,including garages. c: Driveways on residential collector streets should be spaced at least 150 feet apart and/or aligned across the street. E.5 If driveways or private streets are gated, all gated entrances shall conform to our Residential Project Gated Entrance design guide, which provides a turn-around area outside the gate for visitors failing to gain access,without backing into the public street. E.6 Etiwanda frontage improvements shall be in accordance with the Etiwanda Specific plan. Refer to Figures 5-23 and 5-26. Provide cobble curb and gutter, property line adjacent sidewalk, street trees and 9500 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlights. E.7 Candlewood and interior (public or private) street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local" standards including curb and gutter, property line adjacent sidewalk, street trees and 5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlights. E.8 Dedicate. an additional 10 feet along the Etiwanda Avenue frontage of APN 1100-031-07. Ten feet of excess right-of-way along the Etiwanda Avenue frontage of APN 1100-041-01 can be vacated. Item A-4 SCREENCHECK LETTER COMMENTS ORC2015-00155- 4/14/2015 . Page 3 Incompleteness Items Additional information that must be subbmitted prior to finding the application complete and scheduling the project for the next stage in the Development Review Process: C.Fire Prevention/New Construction Unit Moises Eskenazi (909)477-2710 Ext. 4209 moises.eskenazi@cityofrc.us F.1 The proposed development must be redesigned in accordance with the RCFPD Standards for FD access. SFR must be accessible from public streets designed per the engineering department's standards or from private streets design in accordance with RCFPD Standard 5-1. Street parking, if not available under the private street design must be provided in the form of additional guest parking. D.Building and Safety Services Department B&S.1 None at this time. E.Grading Section G.1 None at this time. Technical Issues • The following preliminary technical issues are minimum Code requirements, which must be satisfied before the project can be recommended for approval to the Planning Commission. It is recommended that these issues be addressed in the revised plans: A.Planning Department P.1 None at this time. B.Engineering Services Department Betty Miller (909)477-2740 Ext. 4021 betty.miller@cityofrc.us E.1 Where single family residential developments back onto arterial streets, the area outside the perimeter wall is publicly maintained by a Landscape Maintenance District (LIVID). With private streets or multifamily developments, including detached condominiums, a homeowners' association will be responsible for perimeter landscape maintenance as well as interior streets, streetlights, street trees and storm drainage facilities. E.2 This developer will be required to place existing overhead utilities on Etiwanda Avenue underground. Other developments have already undergrounded to south of Candlewood Street, so only three power poles will be left between the south property line of the proposed tract and the Freeway underpass. Across the street development has already deposited funds for their share of the undergrounding costs, so this developer should be encouraged to complete the final 230 feet to the south along with their own frontage. E.3 This development shall accept surface runoff from the existing "Not A Part" parcel at the southeast corner of Etiwanda and Candlewood. • Item A-5 SCREENCHECK LETTER COMMENTS DRC2015-00155- 4/14/2015 Page 4 Technical Issues The following preliminary technical issues are minimum Code requirements, which. must be satisfied before the project can be recommended for approval to the Planning Commission. It is recommended that these issues be addressed in the revised plans: D.Building and Safety Services Department B&S.1 None at this time. E.Grading Section Matthew Addington (909)477-2710 Ext.4202 matthew.add ington @cityofrc.us G.1 This project is proposing high density. The proposed site plan shows a two dimensional view. The applicant will be required to submit a set a three-dimensional set of plans considering wet utilities, grading,drainage and storm water quality requirements. Design Issues, Preliminary Conditions of Approval,or Comments The following are Preliminary conditions or design issues that are recommended to be addressed in the revised plans: A.Planning Department P.1 None at this time. B.Engineering Services Department Betty Miller (909)477-2740 Ext.4021 betty.miller@cityofrc.us EA To be provided upon submittal of a tentative tract map application. Item A-6 FULL SIZED SET OF PLAINS ATTACHED TO DELIVERED AGENDA PACKET Item A-7 i' THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 27, 2015 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California FIF� I. CALL TO ORDER • Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Wimberly_ Vice Chairman Oaxaca Munoz_ Howdyshell _ FletcherFIF-7� _ II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA _ ANCHo MAY 27, 2015 GAMONGA Page 2 7III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Consideration of minutes dated May 13, 2015 B. Consideration of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 IV. SCHEDULED MATTERS/PLANNING COMMISSION C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00057-SSRB GROUP, INC.-A 6-month progress report reviewing compliance with Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 for the operation of a full service restaurant and bar with outdoor dining located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue within the Specialty Commercial (SC) Zoning, District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, Suite K1 —APN: 0208-101-23. D. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2012-00058-SSRB GROUP, INC.-A 6-month progress report reviewing compliance of Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 that currently provides live entertainment at a full service restaurant and bar with outdoor dining located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue within the Specialty Commercial (SC)Zoning District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, Suite K1 —APN: 0208-101-23. E. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(MODIFICATION)DRC2014-00774-SSRB GROUP, INC.- A 6-month progress report reviewing compliance with Conditional Use Permit(Modification) DRC2014-00774 for the increase in the hours-of-operation in order to open earlier for an existing restaurant and bar located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue within the Specialty Commercial (SC) Zoning District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, Suite K1 —APN: 0208-101-23. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. F. TIME EXTENSION DRC2015-00244—6TH&HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC-A request to extend the duration of an existing entitlement approval by an additional one(1)year for an industrial warehouse/office project comprised of two(2)buildings with a combined floor area of about 100,000 square feet on a parcel of about 212,000 square feet(4.87 acres) in the General Industrial(GI)District located at 9212 Hermosa Avenue;APN: 0209-211-41. Related files: Development Review DRC2007-00696, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18872, and Time J HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA C Ho MAY 27, 2015 ONGA Page 3 Extension DRC2013-00326. On May 14, 2008 The Planning Commission determined that the project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions and Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects. Per Section 15162, no further environmental review is required as there are no changes to the project. G. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2015-00278 — 909 PUB & GRILL - A request to modify an existing entertainment permit, currently comprised of karaoke, live bands, and dancing, for an existing restaurant/bar of about 5,300 square feet in the Industrial Park(IP)District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District(ICOD), located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A; APN: 0229-012-22. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673, Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563, and Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2015-00279. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 — Existing Facilities • H. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2015-00279—909 PUB & GRILL- A request to modify the operating hours of an existing restaurant/bar of about 5,300 square feet in the Industrial Park(IP)District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District(ICOD), located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A; APN: 0229-012-22. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 and Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563, and Entertainment Permit Modification DRC2015-00278. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 — Existing Facilities. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048 — RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN: A proposal to construct an industrial building of about 161,000 square feet on a parcel of about 322,000 square feet(7.4 acres) in the General Industrial (GI)District located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street; APN: 0209-411-36. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION J. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES K. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS • t AHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA P,ANCHO MAY 27, 2015 CDCANIONCA Page 4 VII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission will immediately adjourn to the Rains Room for Pre- Application Review DRC2015-00155- Marc Homes, LLC 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee,hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 21, 2015,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. I O HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA C§RANCHO MAY 27, 2015 =ONGA Page 5 APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,533 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. 0 vicinity Map Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting MAY 27, 2015 I ' C.—Or Mll..E e.._�. _.�.—....—.._� r 1 as ; I j CL U = Q = = 1 Y I I a q L C low � m 1 is 19th St `t i Base Line ' Base Line J Church Church Foothill•! , Foothill N C L Ew Arrow to Arrow m m C J rsey s i 8th Y c 6th w y4th = 4thMeeting Location: CID,E I G H City HallICouncil Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Item A: Consideration of Regular Meeting Minutes May 13, 2015 Item B: Consideration of CIP/Citywide Items C, D, E: 6-Month Review of Business SSRB Group, Inc. Item F: Time Extension DRC2016-00244 Items G, H: EP DRC2016-00278 & CUP DRC2015-00279 909 Pub & Grill Item I: Dev. Review DRC2014-01048—RGA Ij THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE MINUTES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 13, 2015 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I'. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 PM • Roll Call Chairman Wimberly X Vice Chairman Oaxaca X Munoz A Howdyshell X Fletcher X Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Rebecca Fuller, Administrative Secretary; Tom Grahn, Acting Senior Planner; Jason Welday, Traffic Engineer; Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner; Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Michael Parmer, Management Analyst I �1�- ��PU �IC�FOMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to rive minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which • might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None Item Al 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO MAY 139 2015 CUCAMONCa Page 2 III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION. A. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES DATED APRIL 22, 2015 Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Oaxaca, carried 3-0-1-1 (Fletcher abstain, Munoz absent) IV. ' DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/PLANNING COMMISSION: B. CONSIDERATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE CIRCULATION MASTER PLAN (CMP) FOR BICYCLISTS AND PEDESTRIANS Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner, Mike Parmer, Management Analyst 1, and Lea Stender from ALTA Planning + Design, gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) and asked the Commission for any final comments. Commissioner Howdyshell said it is a great document that covers many areas particularly regarding urban design. She noted is also focuses on our 5 main principles found in the General Plan. Vice Chairman Oaxaca asked if this is a document that will be revisited or amended in the future. Ms. Nakajima said it would be re-visited but in terms of implementation. She said Phase 2 of this project would include looking at feasibility and begin to implement these concepts into other controlling documents of the City such as the General Plan and Development Code. The Secretary received and filed the CMP. V. PUBLIC IIEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(MODIFICATION)DRC2015-00227-HWS BAR AND GRILL- A request to modify Conditional Use Permit 87-06 and Conditional Use Permit(Modification) DRC2013-01025 to increase the floor area by 1,200 square feet for a restaurant with a bar Item A2 Ar HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION �, AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ANcHO MAY 139 2015 CucnMovCA Page 3 within the Neighborhood Commercial(NC)Development District, located at 974019th Street -APN: 1076-011-10. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 -Existing Facilities. D. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT(MODIFICATION)DRC2015-00228-HK'S BAR AND GRILL- A request to modify Entertainment Permit DRC2013-01027 in order to increase the floor area by 1,200 square feet for a restaurant with a bar that provides entertainment within the Neighborhood Commercial (NC)Development District, located at 974019th Street—APN: 1076-011-10. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report and gave a brief PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Harold Miller, owner of HK's Bar and Grill said they have been there 2 years. He said they took a sour business and made it a good one. He thanked staff for their cooperation and the ability to expand. ® Chairman Wimberly opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. Commissioner Howdyshell said she is pleased to see a business expand and the good public safety record. She said it is very positive and creates more jobs. Commissioner Fletcher said the applicant has done an excellent job since taking over. He said it shows that the business can operate in a good/successful manner where others have claimed they could not without numerous concessions. Vice Chairman Oaxaca acknowledged the applicant and thanked them for reading their conditions and keeping their commitments. Chairman Wimberly agreed with all the comments. He thanked the applicant for staying in compliance and for the limited calls for service. He said it's great that the Sheriff does not have to be at your facility so they can be elsewhere. He said he hopes they maintain this trend. Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-0-1 (Munoz absent) to adopt Resolutions 15-30 and 15-31 approving the requested modifications for Items C and D as presented by staff. E. TIME EXTENSION DRC2015-00239—LIFEWAY CHURCH MINISTRIES-A request for a one-year time extension of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926 for Lifeway Church to construct the remaining phases of the previously approved Master Plan, including a 15,000 square foot, two-story classroom wing and a 10,074 square foot multi-purpose hall for Item A3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO MAY 13, 2015 CUCAMONCA Page 4 property located within the Low Residential District at 7477 Vineyard Avenue-APN: 0208- 921-36. On April 24, 2002, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Dominic Perez, Assistant Planner gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Vice Chairman Oaxaca confirmed that the applicant must initiate construction within the 1 year extension period and if that does not happen, they must come back and start over for a new entitlement. Mr. Perez stated that is correct. Chairman Wimberly opened the public hearing Pastor Esteves said things for the church have improved with the economy. He confirmed the trees are 36-inch box size and they will be installed during construction. He said plans have already been submitted and they expect construction to.start prior to the end of the extension period. Chairman Wimberly closed the public hearing. Chairman Wimberly noted a condition is included with the option to select drought tolerant tree species. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Oaxaca, carried 4-0-0-1 (Munoz absent) to adopt Resolution 15-32 approving the requested Time Extension as presented by staff. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00546 —7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC-A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low(L) Residential to High (H) Residential for 2.25 acres of land, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545,Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00547— 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC-A request to amend the Zoning Map from Low(L) Residential to High(H)Residential and to establish a Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District(SH)for 2.25 Item A4 Y HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RAxcHo MAY 13, 2015 �L'CAMONGA Page 5 acres of land, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road;APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545, General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action.A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2014-00610- 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC — A Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and 7418 Archibald, LLC,for the purpose of providing a senior housing project in accordance with the Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District(SHOZD), including deviating from certain development standards, for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545, General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546,Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713,and Tree Removal Permit • DRC2015-00275. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 - 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC-The request to develop a 24,641 square foot,60-unit,three-story senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land in the Low (L) Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) (the associated General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment applications propose the High(H)Residential District(24-30 dwelling units per acre)and the Zoning Map Amendment also proposes establishing the Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH) on the project site), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59: Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. J. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00713-7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC-A request to increase the height of a combination retaining and garden wall height from 6 feet to 8 feet, along the west and south property line of a proposed 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, three-story senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land in the Low (L) Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) (the associated General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment applications propose the High(H) Residential District(24-30 dwelling units per acre)and the Zoning Map Amendment also proposes establishing the Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH) on the project site), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545, General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Zoning Map Amendment Item A5 • i HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES R1NCHO MAY 139 2015 CLT"ONGA Page 6 DRC2014-00547, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. K. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2015-00275 - 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC - The request to remove 14 trees, including 3 heritage trees, for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, three-story senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land in the Low (L) Residential District(2-4 dwelling units per acre)(the associated General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment applications propose the High (H)Residential District(24-30 dwelling units per acre) and the Zoning Map Amendment also proposes establishing the Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District(SH)on the project site), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road;APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545, General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546,Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, and Minor Exception DRC2014-00713. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Tom Grahn, Acting Senior Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation(copy on file). He noted amended conditions placed before the Commission that were not available at the time of the agenda production and have been incorporated into the resolution and standard conditions(copy on file). He said one comment letter was received in opposition from a neighbor expressing concern about the height of the building as it would invade their privacy and jeopardize their safety as it might provide an escape route for thieves. Mr. Grahn said Staff believes the setback of 150 feet from the property line provides'a greater separation than the current development and therefore limit exposure and visibility to the adjoining neighborhood. He said the balconies are only on the north and south sides of the building and the residential area is to the west.. This too would minimize their exposure. Commissioner Howdyshell asked what the minimum age is for the apartment renters. Mr. Grahn said it will be 62 years of age. The existing development is 55 years of age. Commissioner Howdyshell asked about the laundry facilities and trash disposal. Vice Chairman Oaxaca asked about the added condition regarding the tribe representative on-site during grading. Mr. Grahn said there were no special findings regarding cultural resources on site, but the General Plan requires us to contact the tribes and the tribe responded and made this special request. Todd Cottle of 7418 Archibald LLC said the laundry facility uses a rechargeable card system, no coins. He said the building does not have a chute for trash. Each floor has an Item A6 PHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES HORMAY 139 2015 CUCAMONCA Page 7 elevator and the residents would take their trash down to the enclosure outside. Chairman Wimberly asked the applicant if they agree to the modified conditions. Mr. Cottle said they agree. Chairman Wimberly opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing none, closed the public hearing. Commissioner Howdyshell said she is impressed with the nice/generous sized apartments. Commissioner Fletcher thanked staff for the thorough report. He said he saw the project at DRC and said he is happy to see this type of development as it serves a need and we encourage this with development bonuses. He said it is an excellent location for this type of development and the amendments are compatible with the existing development. He said he really likes the raised garden beds and believes they will be used and enjoyed by the residents. • Vice Chairman Oaxaca said he is happy to see we can offer more places for seniors to live in Rancho Cucamonga and that 1/3 of the units are available for low income residents. Chairman Wimberly said he agrees with all the comments as they are well thought out, it is a desirable location and the affordability of the units is all good for the City and our seniors. Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-0-1 (Munoz absent) for Items E-K to forward a recommendation to the City Council to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and to recommend Approval of Resolutions 15-33, 15-34 and 15-35 for the General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment and the Development Agreement. The motion included the final adoption of Resolutions 15-36, 15-37 and 15-38 for approval of the Design Review with amended conditions, Minor Exception and Tree Removal permits. VI.. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION L. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES M. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS Commissioner Fletcher commented on the importance of the work done by the Base Line Etiwanda Historic Task Force and noted his concern about possibly losing opportunities to • preserve the history and culture of Rancho Cucamonga. He said these task force meetings occurred over 10 years ago, but he would like to re-visit the concepts first addressed by that Item A7 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO MAY 135 2015 C AMONGA Page 8 task force and he has given his notes and materials from those meetings to staff for review. He said he is concerned about the history and the culture being lost. Chairman Wimberly recalled the property discussed and noted there was significance about the property on the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. He said the importance was recognized at that time with respect to preserving the wine theme as the property is adjacent to the Filippi Winery. VII. . ADJOURNMENT 8:30 PM 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee,hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 7, 2015, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at(909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Item A8 J• HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES P,kNCHo MAY 139 2015 CUCAMoxcA Page 9 Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,533 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at wwW.CitvofRC.us. • Item A9 .I• STAFF REPORT • ENGINEERING SER XEti DEPARTNIENT Date: May 27, 2015 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C;UCAMONGA From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Principal Civil Engineer Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that by minute action the Planning Commission find the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2015/16 in conformity with the adopted General Plan. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS- The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as attached as Exhibit "B" is required per Government Code 65401, Exhibit "A", to be adopted by the City Council. The Planning Commission is required to find the CIP in conformity with the adopted General Plan. The CIP document includes a General Plan Policies section that evidences the specific policy references found in the General Plan. The CIP is a vital piece of the City's Annual Operating Budget as it dictates major capital expenditures obligated in any given year. The CIP consists of a multi-year plan for citywide infrastructure improvements. Each year, the City budgets for"funded"projects which will occur during said fiscal year. The list of projects contained in the CIP addresses both the City's long and short-term capital needs. It identifies projects that reflect the desires of the community, as well as projects that serve operational and maintenance needs. The City's Engineering staff works with all Departments within the City to develop and implement an economically feasible CIP that embodies the City's public infrastructure needs. The CIP is the product of joint planning, taken from the City's General Plan, local residents, the business community, the local development community, and external government agencies. The projects have been categorized by type of project (Beautification, Drainage, Facilities, etc.), which are in alphabetical order within each category. The individual project sheets include a short summary, cost, year funded, and a map showing the project location. Projects are funded from a variety of sources including Development Impact Fees, Measure "I", Gas Tax, and miscellaneous grants. There are 72 projects totaling just over $64,000,000 to be executed in the upcoming fiscal year. Apart from the 72 projects previously identified, 26 projects just over $75,000,000 are identified as future and unfunded. Resp y itted, Mark A. Steuer •Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Government Code 65401 Exhibit "B" - Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Capital Improvement Program (distributed under separate cover) Item 131 .r Government Code 65401. If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, within such time as may be fixed by the legislative body, each county or city officer, department, board, or commission, and each governmental body, commission, or board, including the governing body of any special district or school district, whose jurisdiction lies wholly or partially within the county or city, whose functions include recommending, preparing plans for, or constructing, major public works, shall submit to the official agency, as designated by the respective county board of supervisors or city council, a list of the proposed public works recommended for planning, initiation or construction during the ensuing fiscal year. The official agency receiving the list of proposed public works shall list and classify all such recommendations and shall prepare a coordinated program of proposed public works for the ensuing fiscal year. Such coordinated program shall be submitted to the county or city planning agency for review and report to said official agency as to conformity with the adopted general plan or part thereof. • Exhibit A Item B2 .r J CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 ® DISTRIBUTED UNDEREP S ARATE COVER EXHIBIT B Item B3 r STAFF REPORT PL-INNING DEPARTMENT DATE: May 27, 2015 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C,UCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DRC2012-00057 - SSRB GROUP, INC. - A 6-month progress report reviewing compliance with Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 for the operation of a full service restaurant and bar with outdoor dining located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue within the Specialty Commercial (SC) Zoning District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, Suite K1 —APN: 0208-101- 23. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT - DRC2012-00058 - SSRB GROUP, INC. - A 6-month progress report reviewing compliance with Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 to provide live entertainment at a full service restaurant and bar with outdoor dining located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue within the Specialty Commercial (SC) Zoning District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, Suite K1 —APN: 0208-101- 23. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (MODIFICATION) - DRC2014-00774 - SSRB GROUP, INC. - A 6-month progress report reviewing compliance with Conditional • Use Permit (Modification) DRC2014-00774 for the increase in the hours-of-operation in order to open earlier for an existing restaurant and bar located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue within the Specialty Commercial (SC) Zoning District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, Suite K1 —APN: 0208-101-23. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the business is being operated in compliance with Conditional Use Permit 2012-00057, Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2014-00774 (Modification) and that an additional 6-month review is not necessary at this time. Staff asks that the Planning Commission provide comment and direction as appropriate, and that the Planning Commission secretary receive and file the report. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residential & Offices - Low-Medium (LM) Residential & Office Professional (OP) South - Commercial Development W/ Service Station — Community Commercial (CC) (Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 2) East - Commercial Development - Community Commercial (CC) (Foothill Boulevard ® District, Subarea 2) West - Commercial Development - Community Commercial (CC) (Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 2) C, D, E1 Y PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTORS REPORT DRC2012-00057. DRC2012-00058 & DRC2014-00774 - SSRB GROUP, INC. May 27, 2015 Page 2 B. General Plan Designations: Project Site—General Commercial North - Office, Low-Medium South - Community Commercial East - General Commercial West - General Commercial C. Project Background: The Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 and Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 on July 12, 2012 for the operation of a restaurant and bar with live entertainment. The Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit (Modification) DRC2014-00774 on September 24, 2014 to change the hours-of-operation of the business to open 2 hours earlier from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.. The applicant is approved to operate a restaurant with a Type 47 alcohol license, which permits full service of beer, wine and distilled spirits for on-site consumption. The restaurant is required to operate as a "bona fide eating place" as defined in the California Business and Professions Code Section 23028. The current approved hours of operation are Sundays through Thursday from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and Friday and Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. ANALYSIS: A. 6-Month Review: Conditional Use Permit (Modification) DRC2014-00774 included a Condition of Approval requiring a 6-Month Review of the business operation to verify compliance with the approved entitlements. B. Public Safety Calls for Service History: Staff contacted the Rancho Cucamonga Sherriff's Department and was informed that from October 1, 2014 through April 30, 2015 there had been ten (10) calls-for-service received by the Sheriffs Department related to the business. The number of calls-for-service are considered below average for a restaurant with bar of this size. The false alarm calls are related to the business' security alarm system being triggered. The calls-for-service breakdown is as follows: • October, 2014: One call-for-service for a fight involving 12 to 15 patrons resulting in 2 arrests. • November, 2014: Four calls-for-service including two calls for intoxicated patrons and two calls for false alarms. December, 2014: One call-for-service for a false alarm. January, 2015: Three calls-for-service including two calls for intoxicated patrons and one call for a false alarm. February, 2015: No calls-for-service. March, 2015: No calls-for-service. C, D, E2 PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTORS REPORT DRC2012-00057. DRC2012-00058 & DRC2014-00774 - SSRB GROUP, INC. • May 27, 2015 Page 3 • April, 2015: One call-for-service for a false alarm. The Sherriff's Department performed four compliance checks between the September 24, 2014 Planning Commission meeting and April 30, 2015. No violations were observed on the October 18, 2014 and December 31, 2014 compliance checks. Two bottles of alcohol were found to be contaminated with debris and were poured out during the March 30, 2015 compliance check. The main entrance and patio doors to the business were open while entertainment was provided on the April 3, 2015 compliance check, in violation of the Conditions of Approval for the Entertainment Permit. The manager was informed that the doors needed to be closed when entertainment is available and she complied. Overall, the Sherriff's Department found the business to be managed in conformance with all the Conditions of Approval for the approved Conditional Use Permit and Entertainment Permit and operated in a professional manner that does not negatively impact public safety. It should be noted that Sherriff's Department has not received any noise complaints related to the business. C. Compliance with CUP and EP: Planning staff inspected the business on three occasions to review the business operation and conformance with the approved Conditional Use Permits and Entertainment Permit. On each visit, the business was substantially below the permitted occupancy rating of 337 persons with the only violation observed being the front • entrance and patio doors being kept open on one visit while entertainment was available. Overall, staff found the business to be in compliance with the approved Conditional Use Permit and Entertainment Permit and to be professionally operated. An overview of Staff's site inspections are as follows: Saturday, April 4, 2015 — The visit took place at 10:30 p.m. Staff found approximately 40 patrons in the restaurant. There was a security guard at the front entrance checking I.D.'s and a full menu was being served. There was a D.J. performing and all the doors to the restaurant were open, in violation of the Conditions of Approval for the Entertainment Permit. Saturday, April 18, 2015 —The visit took place at 11:00 p.m. Staff found approximately 50 patrons in the restaurant. There was a security guard checking I.D.'s at the front entrance and a full menu was being served. There was a D.J. performing and there were no minors in the restaurant and staff found the business to be operating in conformance with the approved entitlements. Thursday, April 30, 2015 — The visit took place at 1:00 p.m. Staff found approximately 2 patrons in the restaurant. The business was in full compliance of the approved entitlements. C, D, E3 PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTORS REPORT DRC2012-00057. DRC2012-00058 & DRC2014-00774 - SSRB GROUP, INC. May 27, 2015 Page 4 D. Applicant Conference: Staff and Sherriff's Department deputies held a joint meeting with the applicant on April 21, 2105, to discuss the site inspections conducted by Staff and the Sherriff's Department. The deputies informed the applicant that the operation of the business had greatly improved since the September 24, 2014, Planning Commission meeting and that other than the issue with the doors being open when entertainment was available, the business was in conformance with approved entitlements. The applicant stated that he has worked diligently to conform to the Conditions of Approval and run the business in a manner that provides a safe atmosphere for his customers. He stated that he had spoken to his managers and staff and they are aware that the doors must be closed when entertainment is available. E. Site Conditions: Staff reviewed compliance with the approved floor plan and found that only minimal changes had been made. A small raised portion of the seating area that was originally approved for tables and chairs was now furnished with couches and lounge chairs. The parking lot was kept clean and no patrons were observed loitering in the parking lot. The applicant informed staff that they have personnel monitor the parking lot on a regular basis. F. Alcohol Beverage Control: Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) last inspected the business on October 22, 2014, and found no violations. G. Business License: The Business License is up to date and Admissions Tax through March 31, 2015, has been remitted. The Admissions Tax is due by the 10th day of each month and has not been paid for the month of April, at the time of this report. H. Conclusion: The business is being operated in conformance with the approved Conditional Use Permits and Entertainment Permit except for the doors being kept open on April 3 and April 4, 2015 while entertainment was available. As noted above, the applicant has communicated to the managers the importance of following the requirement to keep the doors to the business closed while entertainment is being provided. Because of the positive outcomes of both Sherriff's Department,and Planning staff inspections, it is staff's professional opinion that an additional 6-month review is unnecessary at this time. Staff will continue to monitor the business and will schedule a Planning Commission review if the business is not operating in compliance with the conditions of approval. Respectfully submitted, Candy+Buetftt Planning Director CB:TV/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Staff Report with Exhibits for CUP DRC2012-00057 and EP DRC2012-00058 dated July 11, 2012 C, D, E4 PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTORS REPORT DRC2012-00057. DRC2012-00058 & DRC2014-00774 - SSRB GROUP, INC. ® May 27, 2015 Page 5 Exhibit B - Staff Report with Exhibits for CUP (Modification) DRC2014-00774 dated September 24, 2014 Exhibit C - Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 Exhibit D - Resolution of Approval for Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 Exhibit E - Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit (Modification) DRC2014-00774 Exhibit F - Approved minutes from Planning Commission Meeting dated September 24, 2014 C, D, E5 STAFF REPORT PLiNNING DEPARP�MNT DATE: July 11, 2012 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Interim Planning Director BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: NON CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DRC2012-00057 - THOMAS WINERY PLAZA - SSB PARTNERS INC. - A request to operate a full service restaurant and bar with outdoor eating areas and entertainment within a historic building at the Thomas Winery Plaza located in Subarea 2 of the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard — APN: 0208-101-23. Related Files: Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 and Minor Development Review DRC2012-00696. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT - DRC2012-00058 - SSB PARTNERS INC. - A request to provide live entertainment such as a disc jockey, bands and dancing at a full service restaurant and bar with outdoor dining in the Thomas Winery Plaza located in Subarea 2 of the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard — APN: 0208-101-23, Related Files: Non Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 and Minor Development • Review DRC2012-00696. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. MINOR DEVELOMENT REVIEW - DRC2012-00696 - SSB PARTNERS INC. - A request to construct a second outdoor eating area that is 1,093 square feet located on the north side of the building at a proposed restaurant and bar in the Thomas Winery Plaza in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 2) at 8916 Foothill Boulevard. APN: 0208-101-23. Related Files: Non Construction Conditional Use Permit, DRC2012-00057 and Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existinq facilities. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Non Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057, Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 and Minor Development Review DRC2012-00696 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq: North - Single-Family Residential/ Offices - Low-Medium Residential/Office South - Commercial strip center and gas station — Community Commercial (Foothill .Boulevard District, Subarea 2) East - Shopping Center- Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 2) • West - Shopping Center- Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 2) EXHIBIT A C, D, E6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2012-00057, DRC2012-00058 and DRC2012-00696—SSB PARTNERS INC. July 11, 2012 Page 2 B. General Plan Designations: Project Site—General Commercial North - Office, Low-Medium South - Community Commercial East - General Commercial West - General Commercial C. Site Characteristics: The proposed applications are for a restaurant and sports bar with outdoor dining and ancillary entertainment in an existing historic winery building located within the Thomas Winery Plaza (Exhibit A). The subject tenant space with the two patios comprises•a total of 7,597 square feet. The site is currently improved with landscaping, lighting, and parking areas. D. Parking Calculations: The center has obtained approval of Minor Exception DRC2012- 00536 on June 19, 2012, to reduce the required parking for the Thomas Winery Plaza by 20 percent. A parking analysis was prepared By Clyde E. Sweet and Associates on May 30, 2012. The report states that at peak demand it is estimated that the Plaza will only utilize 468 of the 511 parking spaces that are currently located on the site. The table below indicates what the require parking will be for the restaurant and bar. Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Restaurant with Bar 7,597 1:100 76 76 and outdoor patios ANALYSIS: A. Background: The existing building was previously occupied by Bobby Baia's Restaurant and bar. Bobby Baja's closed in 2008 and was subsequently leased to SSB Partners Inc after which they submitted the applications under review. The new restaurant.and bar has not been named as of the time of this report. B. General: The restaurant and bar will occupy a lease space of approximately 7,597 square feet with two outdoor dining areas of approximately 1,819 square feet located at the north and south sides of the building. The building occupant load is 345 with seating for 261 people. A bar area of approximately 380 square feet, with 17 bar stools is located in the center of the restaurant along the north wall of the seating area. The previous bar was located in the northeast corner of the dining area and was approximately 200 square feet. A 166 - square foot raised platform is located on the west side of the restaurant for all live performances, including bands, disc jockeys and karaoke. A dance floor area of approximately 200 square feet is located directly in front of the stage. The remainder of the restaurant is dedicated to table seating that can be removed as necessary depending upon the type and scale of event. There are 16 flat screen televisions located throughout the restaurant. The applicant has applied for a Conditional Use Permit in order to allow a bar use in conjunction with a restaurant, as well as for the applicant to obtain a Type-47 License to serve distilled spirits. C, D, E7 ` I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2012-00057, DRC2012-00058 and DRC2012-00696 — SSB PARTNERS INC. • July 11, 2012 Page 3 In addition to the Conditional Use Permit, the applicant has applied for an Entertainment Permit in order to allow live bands, dancing, a disc jockey and karaoke. The business will primarily operate as a restaurant during the day, and in the evening the restaurant will host a live band performance, while still offering a late night dining menu. The proposed hours of operation for the restaurant and bar are as follows: Hours of Operation Friday and Saturday: 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Sundays through Thursday: 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. The proposed entertainment hours are as follows: Entertainment Tvae/Hours Monday through Sunday: 9:30 p.m. to close No entertainment will be provided in the outdoor patios. All entertainment will occur within the building. Live entertainment will be performed after 9:30 pm when the restaurant will be limited to persons 21 years and over. C. Historic Resources: The Thomas Winery building where the restaurant will be located is a State and locally designated historic landmark. Historic artifacts such as the stairs to the upper floor storage area and wine barrel near the kitchen are required to be inventoried by the applicant and preserved and maintained in place. Any change to these items requires a Certificate of Appropriateness to be filed and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. The Historic Preservation Commission has also discussed the preservation of a wine conveyer currently located on the main floor of the building. The Historic Preservation Commission gave the Planning Director the authority to move towards a workable solution. Staff has advocated that the artifact be preserved and stored on site in the upper floor storage area. The new patio does not require a Certificate of Appropriateness because it will not alter or change the existing historic building. The new patio does not attach to the existing building in any way and utilizes materials that are used on the building and surrounding structures. The existing patio on the south side of the building is proposed be reconstructed in-kind; therefore, it does not require a Certificate of Appropriateness.t This work will be done by the property manager. Previous restaurants were required to include information about the Thomas Winery and still buildings in their menus. Staff has placed a condition of approval that requires the applicant to incorporate a short history of the winery building into the food and drinks menu. D. Compatibility of Use: The subject applications are a request to operate a restaurant and bar with outdoor dining and include entertainment such as live bands and dancing as ® ancillary to the primary use (restaurant). The subject site has a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial, which the General Plan describes as: "The Genera/ C, D, E8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2012-00057, DRC2012-00058 and DRC2012-00696— SSB PARTNERS INC. July 11, 2012 Page 4 Commercial designation applies to properties along major activity corridors. This designation provides for a wide range of community-oriented and regional-orientated commercial businesses, including businesses that cater to tourists traveling on Historic Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard)." Staff believes that the applications are consistent with the General Plan land use designation in that the proposed use will offer entertainment opportunities for local residents and regional visitors, creating a more vibrant urban space. Because of the uniqueness of the Thomas Winery Plaza, in conjunction with adequate on- site parking to serve the proposed use, staff believes that the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan and the purposes of the district in which it is located. Together with the conditions applicable thereto, staff believes that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Coffee Klatch which is closest to the restaurant opens as early as 6:30 a.m. and closes by 9 p.m. so it will not be affected by the use. E. Security SSB Partners Inc. has established a thorough security plan to address potential situations during business operations, as well as ensure proper alcohol service. SSB Partners Inc. has provided a copy of their Security Procedures as Exhibit E, which clearly describes the role of their security personnel in dealing with any issues that may arise. After 9:30 p.m. security will be maintained at 1 officer for each 75 patrons. The security staff will patrol both inside and outside the building. At the end of live events one-half of the security staff deployed will be stationed outside to assist and ensure patrons leave safely. Random outside patrol checks approximately every half hour will be conducted nightly. The goal of the security staff is to have all patrons out of the building at closing and out'of the parking area 15 minutes after closing. In addition to the security provisions proposed by SSB Partners Inc., staff has included a condition in the resolution that will require an employee who serves alcohol to obtain a Certificate of Completion for training in the proper service of alcohol (L.E.A.D. or equivalent). Also, an additional condition of approval has been included requiring the applicant to cease all alcohol sales no less than thirty (30) minutes before closing. This is to ensure that all patrons will have adequate time between consuming a drink and leaving the establishment. F. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) because the project does not result in any major interior or exterior alterations, and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. C, D, E9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • DRC2012-00057, DRC2012-00058 and DRC2012-00696—SSB PARTNERS INC. July 11, 2012 Page 5 FACTS FOR FINDING: Conditional Use Permit The evidence indicates that: 1. The subject site has a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial. The proposed use is in accordance with General Plan Policy LU-1.3 which encourages commercial centers to provide a broad range of retail and service needs for the community. With the addition of the restaurant and bar with outdoor dining to the shopping center, the shopping center can expand its services and attract a wider range of residents; and 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as conditions have been imposed to ensure the proper service of alcohol to patrons, and the building complies with all applicable Fire and Building Codes; and 3. The proposed use complies with each applicable provision of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code as the use occupies an existing building that is in • conformance with the Development Code as it relates to parking, setbacks, height, etc., and sufficient conditions have been imposed to ensure that the use will comply with the Performance Standards set forth in Section 17.10.050 of the Development Code and will not create adverse impacts upon adjacent uses. Entertainment Permit The evidence indicates that: 1. The conduct of the establishment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as conditions have been imposed to require onsite security during the hours of entertainment and ensure proper service of alcohol to patrons, and the building complies with all applicable Fire and Building Codes; and 2. The premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner as sufficient conditions have been imposed to ensure that security provisions are in place to regulate the conduct of patrons to prevent incidents resulting in calls for service; and 3. The normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding commercial center and adjacent residential development as conditions have been imposed to ensure that the establishment will comply with the Performance Standards set forth in Section 17.10.050 of the Development Code and will not create adverse impacts upon adjacent uses; and CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dail Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners C, D, E10 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2012-00057, DRC2012-00058 and DRC2012-00696—SSB PARTNERS INC. July 11, 2012 Page 6 within a 660-f6ot radius of the project site. No correspondence or phone calls have been received with respect to the application requests. Respectfully submitted, Jeffrey A. Bloom Interim Planning Director JAB:SF/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Plan Exhibit B - Floor plan Exhibit C - Outdoor Dining Area Elevations Exhibit D - Business Plan Exhibit E - Security Procedures Exhibit F - Menu Exhibit G - Minor Exception for Parking Reduction DRC2012-00536 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 Draft Resolution of Approval for Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Development Review DRC2012-00696 C, D, Ell 0 • 0 ' ' rn SAN bERN ARDINO R U A L) QPIIO(4s voR YJU IN Sk■ SPOk Ig -_ �. GRILL v T1Tl 1TTl ilk- - z •TrnT _ _ = s W - Lt1111L11LLl LITI Iq CHAMBER z a I cw .c -- COMMERCE - 41 v) (A I.. MA-R SAWN - J •S LJ 0 CL fl I I I I I A I i I j MION.NO'S - m = TTTI f l I I I tJ FRESH EASY _ O: FL _ Q PROJECT U y LOCATION —f—• — I ITTTTI-ll _ c SOLP �1�11-LL11L1.i1 I � i X00 THIL L [JOULE bA ___---- - _6 PR L—A ZIEW, Z— OFFICZ > Ln rx 0 lil cr 110 RDQULn f- ri n- E 0 c Ly L KiTCH[h; T L Lu 7=Q ff 0M ARLA 4r" r) �LL f 14A,SfwG!APARAI!ON c C- A C. il fib—M -3 :1 aaj glib • E" IL ................. FH Ell Mm L i THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PROPOSED RESTAURANT nial. FLOOR PLAN CfF-r-E --J Li ucp DI,rnDGN m " u ?0J. L.i --- - C, k%UF - - ---1. - ---- - ---- Ll V) Lf) KITCIIN --------- - f 0 CL :L t5 L",jAt,,ACLNT A r TENANT r Ab 1A, a!Lmu OCCUPANT LaW",A,". 0 ARE A %WPANT AAfA fie? OF I—zl—I-,'—.J. ------- -Z Z/ IHOMAS WINERY PLA;7A PROPOSED RESTAURAMT ou rxlm DINING bi ING AN MCW-I% a Fl OOR PLAN ,�v . ..��_' t- 111 hJIES ______________________________ _..._._.__-.. ...._.... ............... � _ ----.---- — Ll Lili rit) x :...:; ® Lil LU;i ���• - - SOUTti ELEVATION a z ...,._....... ..... -- - �_ LLJ -- - II- _ - - C �[ Lij Ld i a U —.L —.. : O NORTH ELEVATION = (r W --..U' ---II-----�— Ll -------- FIT ----- FIT i I -- a H -- - - -- i WEST ELEVATION _ EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION Ianl•caaml � ' -"J f:.'o721t�1'. S R A, I `d.`i0L Ta - IL aK i iPi MMria�Tr:t=Y EAST LLEVATICN -- OUIOOOR PATIO NOR tN ELEVATION -- OUTDOOR PATIO SSB Partners, Inc. dba ABC (For permit basis only) Tapas Restaurant and Sports Bar Business Plan April 2012 Sartaj Singh, Sunil Sethi& Bobby Bedi Tel: (909)941-0047 Email:antoninosrc� ahoo.com • Introduction and Overview This business plan has been prepared to introduce new ABC Restaurant and Sports Bar,and Provide a comprehensive understanding of its business operations, its growth strategy and financial objectives necessary to achieve its plan objectives. ABC will be considered a "Casual yet classy Tapas Style Restaurant and Sports bar" concept that offers value in its menu pricing and geazed to consumers who are looking for a quality, healthy, and fun alternative to traditional food. But unlike typical service restaurants tastier. The dining room is more comfortable for relaxed dining,business lluunchesrroacfun 1pl ll be fresher and o take he family and watch all your favorite sports. The Opportunity Americans'appetite for restaurant food is growing bigger, spending$1 billion a day eating away from home. By 2010,the National Restaurant Association predicts consumers will s at the nation's 844,000 restaurants than on eating at home. The nation-wide Quick Service Restauran segment is estimated to reach $15 billion by 2010. Restaurant-industry sales are forecast to advance 2.5% pend more money eating out in 2009 and equal 4% of the U.S. gross domestic product. Restaurant it industry sales are in their consecutive year of real growth. r 17th The residential population of Rancho Cucamonga is • gardens and east of Claremont there is no restaurant that does provide the extening at record number sive e m nu and d west Of 'case A-4) asual yet EXHIBIT D C, D, E16 classy atmosphere as we are planning to showcase in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Funding Requirements Business model is to remodel existing Thomas Winery Building formerly occupied by Bobby Bajas, as such a total investment of in the range of$750,000 to $1000,000 is required for initial start-up expenses, initial inventory,and working capital. Overview We will enter existing high density market providing a new and fun place to enjoy Tapas Style food menu, Full Bar, live entertainment. We will also create a new market that will find this experience most enjoyable. We will provide a quality experience both in the form of food and beverage as well as in the form of service and satisfaction. ABC's will be the"Gathering place where everyone has fun." We will be the restaurant and sports bar of choice for a relaxing meal or the place to be for the family that loves watching sports,having quality meals and enjoying music in an environment that appeals to all. This business venture will accomplish many goals. We will bring ABC to areas that provide the best family dining experience to the community. We will help our community and the local economy grow by providing jobs and community involvement.We will develop relationships with Iocal law enforcement, paramedics and fire fighters, letting them know that we care and support their efforts.Fundraisers, donations,and the promoting of a general well-being are all areas of extreme focus. Corporate Structure SSB Partners,Inc.is a Limited Liability Company registered in the State of California. With combined experience of over 40 years in restaurant and management we are confident about this project. Restaurant Location Being located in a Thomas Winery Plaza is advantageous as it will create consumer traffic,attraction,and joint revenue. In short,we'll create an environment with high amounts of synergy. Our Location is approximately 6,000 sq ft and will accommodate a capacity of approximately 200 seats after remodeling. Ample parking is available within shopping centers. The restaurant will operate from approximately I 1 am to 12 pm Sunday thru Thursday and from I 1 am to 2 am Friday and Saturday. C, D, E17 • Product Description ABC will be a full service restaurant and sports bar geared to consumers who are looking for a quality, healthy,and fun alternative to traditional restaurant. The ABC concept offers the best benefits of full service restaurants such as convenience,affordability, and a fun atmosphere to watch all your favorite sports in a fun yet classy environment,and enjoy live music such as Bands, Dj`s and karaoke in the evenings.. But unlike typical full service restaurants, ABC's product will be inventive, fresher and tastier. The dining room is more comfortable for relaxed dining, business lunches,or a fun place to take the family. We will serve full meals and drinks in our front and back patios. Our full menu will consists of Small plates, Salads and Entrees, full bar and will be available to patrons during all business hours. ABC will offer this menu served in an atmosphere that can accommodate a couple just out for a meal, or a group of virtually any size. Our casual, classy and relaxed seating and dining room arrangement allows flexibility not found in other dining restaurants. Marketing Strategy ABC's marketing strategy embodies the following main elements: • Provide a memorable dining experience. • Implement a Promotion Strategy that builds awareness and traffic. • Provide outstanding food quality and customer service. • Provide a friendly atmosphere in a convenient location. • Provide good music and make all sports available for customers. Pricing Strategy Pricine Strate�v• pricing will be competitive with local mid-scale restaurants,while maintaining a high price value perception based on superior food quality and unique menu offerings. Thericing strategy is based on affordable and competitive pricing.The pricing structure takes into account overall market factors and competition. PricinL aMective:The price of our service is set to reflect quality service while trying to make it affordable so that it appeals to our target market. Pricin hlethod• Pricing is based on the cost of the products/services plus overhead and administrative costs involved in providing such service,plus a reasonable profit. Promotion Strategy The Company's main marketing strategy will be that of high visibility and word of mouth. The location of the restaurant is in a highly visible area that can be seen by many people both drivin • and on foot, offering an inviting atmosphere to those in the area. g C, D, E18 Community Programs In the business world, it is important to develop good relationships with the community that we do business with and provide our guests the best service and value obtainable.We will demonstrate "best business"practices and will conduct our business by a strict code of ethics. We will strive to achieve good will within the community and will accomplish a high standing with other businesses and consumers alike. Sales Strategy The restaurant will offer personalized service with employee-based knowledge about our products. The restaurant will have attractive decor and a relaxing atmosphere to ensure customer satisfaction.This restaurant will be definitely one of its kind.. Customer care,customer satisfaction and full attention to customer needs are absolutely essential for the success and survival of the business.It is easier and less expensive to maintain a current customer than it is to attract a new one. We will embrace the following: • Focus attention on fulfilling the needs of every customer,in a timely manner. • Provide an environment whereby customers will feel comfortable that their requirements are being handled efficiently. • Be proactive in greeting, serving and appreciating every customer. • Thank every customer for coming and invite them back.Make them feel welcome and that their business is important to us. • Overall customer satisfaction will be our main priority. • Provide a variety of products that are appealing to customers. • Maintain a well stocked inventory of goods. Security Plan after 930 pm ABC plans to and will take all necessary steps to provide accurate security measures for its customers and employees. For live music events,after 930 pm when it will be 21 and over one in-house security person for each 75 patrons will be on duty.All security personnel will be attired in a manner to readily identify them as such. From the time a live music event ends and for 30 minutes thereafter,one-half of all security personnel will be stationed outside the premises to assist and encourage patrons to leave safely. For live events,pre-sale and day-of-sale ticket sales will not exceed capacity. Security staff will regularly patrol both the women's and men's bathroom facilities Video cameras will be mounted to cover the entrance,exits and entire premises. Tapes will be made available upon request by the local Police Department. Security staff will regularly patrol the immediate exterior of the building at least once every half-hour, doing so on a random basis. ABC will familiarize all security staff with provisions of the local ordinance for unruly patron ordinance. C, D, E19 • When a patron acts in a manner that is violent, abusive, indecent, disorderly,ABC's Staff will immediately contact the police and requestthatthat�he police thetherwis provisions of the ordinance. ABC, its managers, and employees may not sell, dispense, or give away alcohol to any person who is under the influence of alcoholic beverage as defined in the local ordinance, nor shall such a person be permitted on the premises. When a customer has been "cut off', the server will notify the other employees. Management will support the server's decision to terminate service to any customer. If a customer is too impaired to drive safely, licensee will try to persuade the customer not to drive, and arrange a safe ride. If the customer refuses, management will notify the location Police Departmentwith a description of the person and the license plate number of the vehicle, if possible. All identification cards used to prove age must be valid (i.e.,may not be expired), and must be government- issued. If the identification card is expired or appears at all questionable to the employee, the employee shall request a second for of identification. The employee will make sure that the individual purchasing the liquor resembles the identification card. All employees are encouraged to ask purchasers questions relatin to their identification in order to verify the information. If the employee checking an ID has a strong g suspicion that an ID is false,altered, or belongs to someone other than the person presenting the ID,he/she shall confiscate the ID and turn it over to management, to be presented to the police. The police will be called, in a timely manner, anytime management or staff has information to believe a crime has been or is about to be committed and/or whenever a threat of or act of violence occurs on the • premises or off premises in areas that would be considered in view or earshot of the establishment. Security or management will ask anyone who is fighting to leave. If necessary, call the local law enforcement agency for assistance. Licensee will permanely refuse security o ann will chronic problem encounter. y Music No Live bands or DJ's will be playing and music out doors. All music will be played ins' of the premises. The noise level will not exceed the maximum allowed by the city Y inside ordinance. ty • C, D, E20 Our Menu Tapas/ Starters selection of olives$6 oyster&cremini mushrooms$6 seasonal daily greens$6 blistered padron peppers, spanish sea salt$6 chefs daily selection of 3 spanish cheeses$15 chefs daily selection of spanish cured meats$18 4 oz pork shoulder conserva$9 4 oz chicken liver conserva$10 4 oz salmon conserva$12 charred rustic bread, raw garlic, vine ripe tomato$6 spanish flatbread, basil &mint, manchego, figs$7 crispy eggplant, honey, spiced yogurt$6 fried potatoes, smoked paprika allioli$6 whipped salt cod and potato, grilled bread$9 albondigas, saffron, allspice$7 grilled shrimp, lemon, garlic$8 fried calamar, garlic allioli$8 tortilla espaiiiola$6 paella cake, tomato-saffron$8 daily empanada$8 pork croquetas$7 Paellas vegetarian: seasonal vegetables$18 castellana: beef, pork, chicken$20 marinaera: seasonal shellfish$22 valenciana: surf&turf$24 Lunch Menu soups and salads chilled heirloom tomato soup with crema fresca,black grapes$6 aromatic seafood stew of bass, mussels, clams, saffron $10 wild arugula with baby tomatoes, hazelnuts, roasted garlic vinaigrette$13 heirloom tomato salad, belgian endive, olive vinaigrette$10 fresh hearts of palm salad, radicchio, lomo ham, parsley, tarragon$9 olive oil marinated spanish tuna with fennel-apple salad$13 petite romaine hearts, garlic dressing, herb croutons, boccarones$10 Sandwiches All served with toasted bread rubbed with raw tomato and garlic, side of arugula and pickled onions (choice of daily side salad or fried potatoes) grilled three cheese$8 jamon serrano and manchego cheese$10 grilled chicken and chorizo$10 conserva tuna salad with herb alioli$9 grilled garlic shrimp$12 braised pork shoulder$11 braised short rib$12 flathreads three cheeses $8 C, D, E21 • basil-mint, mahon, black mission figs$g romesco, pine nuts, manchego, grilled apple, arugula$10 three sausages$11 Dinner Menu first chilled heirloom tomato soup, crema fresca, black grapes$6 aromatic seafood stew of bass, mussels, clams, saffron $10 citrus marinated shrimp,coriander leaf, grilled bread$12 heirloom bean soup, fldeo, morcilla, catalunya sausage$13 wild arugula, baby tomatoes, hazelnuts, roasted garlic vinaigrette$13 fresh hearts of palm salad, radicchio, lomo ham, parsley, tarragon $8 olive oil-marinated Spanish tuna, fennel, granny smith apple$13 warm octopus salad, white nectarine, herbs, smoked paprika$12 crispy pork belly, brussels sprouts, fried egg, salbixtada$14 quail stuffed with tart cherries, apricots, chorizo, roasted figs$15 second pan-roasted chicken, endive, apples, salsa verde $21 roast duck breast, beluga lentils, anise spiced pear, sweet-sour strawberries$24 braised short rib, olive oil crushed potato, red wine reduction $23 12 oz rib-eye steak, patatas bravas, gallego sauce $25 dessert menu crema catalana custard with orange essence$7 • chilled cinnamon rice pudding candied pecans, caramel$7 bitter chocolate mousse Spanish sea salt, e.v. olive oil$7 bar celona split crime brulee, chocolate, &coffee ice cream fried banana, whipped cream $9 selection of ice cream or sorbets daily selections$7 seasonal fruit crisp for two$10 (Please note that the prices and menu options listed here are subject to change without notice) C, D, E22 f SECURITY PLAN for ABC Restaurant and Sports Bar job Description:To maintain a safe,secure,and friendly environment for the guests as well as the staff. job Duties: 1. Greeting the guest: • A simple friendly warm greeting"Hello,how is your night going?"May I see your IDT'Also,thank the guest because without them we would not have a job! • Be nice and courteous being rude is not acceptable. If the guests appears to be intoxicated turn them away or get a manager for approval. 2.Checking ID's: • Every person who enters the building must be 21 and must show valid proof of age. • Swipe every ID checker if available. Acceptable forms of identification: (Assuming the person is the same as on the ID) Level 1-Obvious 21 Level 2- Suspicious,may need manager approval • California Drivers License (Level 1) • California Identification Card(Level 1) • Out of state drivers license (Level 1) • Out of state Identification Cards (Level 2) • Military ID (Level 2) • Passport(Level 2) We DO NOT accept: • Checking cashing cards • School ID's • Expired ID's Anything out of the ordinary should go through a manager: • Birth Certificates with a picture ID • Temporary ID • International ID's ,PG EXHIBIT B C, D,E23 [f you at any time purposely Iet in a minor or take cash o get a person in or to the front of the line you will be TERMINATED on the spot BE AWARE people are going to try pass bogus or someone else's ID to get in, if you are not comfortable with the ID don't argue with the person just explain to them you need a 2nd opinion and call a manager. 3. Dress Code: • Dress code is a tool we use to weed out the undesirables and keep the problem people out. NO Entry with any of the following: • Over sized baggy clothing • Workout attire • Gang or Prison Tatto's • Du Rags • Shirts without sleeves • Gang affiliated attire • Tank Tops ® 4. Maintaining Occupancy Count: Max capacity for this location is approximately 200 people. • Doorman is responsible for keeping an occupancy count using 2 tally counters 1- in 2-out • At no time do we exceed max capacity.A supervisor should be notified 25 people prior to reaching max capacity or if there is a discrepancy in the count • A manager needs to be notified ASAP when police or Fire Dept arrive,assist in anyway possible. S. Maintaining Your Station: • Stations are rotated every Yz hour. • Keep visual or radio contact with other door hosts • Look for Hot Areas • Hot Areas: • Coverchange • Overcrowded Areas • Spills or broken glass • Dance Floor • Bathrooms • Big Parties • Parking lot • C, D, E24 i 6. Problem with Guests: Any patron who does any of the following shall be removed from the premise: 1 fights or challenges another person to fight • 2 maliciously and willfully disturbs another person by loud or unreasoned noise • 3 uses offensive words which are inherently likely to provoke immediate violent reaction Serious Issues: Fighting both parties leave (not at the same time) Drug using or selling Vandalism Throwing up Theft Fraud Under 21 fake 1D Sneaking in Alcohol Smoking 7. Closing Time: • Last call is 1:30,lights on music off at 1:40,politely ask guests to leave the building Work to close out sections of the club starting with the back room,dance floor,etc. • . 2-4 inside,2 at the front door, 1 at the side door and 2-4 outside 7 • No alcohol is to leave the building • Give time for guests to finish their drinks • Don't yell or swear at the guests to get them to leave • Goal is to have everyone out of the building by tam 8. Closing Time in the Parking Lot: • Politely ask guest to leave DO NOT get into an argument over them not leaving quickly • Parking lot must be cleaned 100% of trash,bottles,vomit,or urine. • If altercation breaks out in the parking lit between guests DO NOT jump in and try to break it up until help arrives. • Get license plate cars that are involved in altercations or accidents, always fill out an incident report first thing. • Goal is to have all guests out of the parking lot by 2:15 C, D, E25 l � 9. Other Duties: • Maintain clean restrooms • Empty trash cans when full • Picking up empty bottles,glasses and trash • Cleaning up the parking lot • Brining in patio furniture and signage 10. Cardinal Rules of Security: • Do not ever hit or strike a patron • Do not ever exceed the occupancy load • Do not ever let a minor inside the facility 11. Security Attire • Security personnel are required by the entertainment permit issued for the licensed premises shall be in a uniform or clothing which is readily identifiable as a security person. • 12. Incident Log: • An incident log shall be maintained on the premise on a continual basis with at least one year of entries and be readily available for inspection by police department • The log is for recording any physical altercations, injuries,and objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance occurring in,on, or at the licensed premises, including the immediately adjacent area that is owned, leased,or rented by the license • The log will indicate date, time, description of incident,and action taken C, D, E26 Our Menu Tapas/ Starters selection of olives$6 oyster&cremini mushrooms$6 seasonal daily greens$6 blistered padron peppers, spanish sea salt$6 chef s daily selection of 3 spanish cheeses$15 chef's daily selection of spanish cured meats$18 4 oz pork shoulder conserva$9 4 oz chicken liver conserva$10 4 oz salmon conserva$12 charred rustic bread, raw garlic, vine ripe tomato$6 spanish flatbread, basil&mint, manchego, figs$7 crispy eggplant, honey, spiced yogurt$6 fried potatoes, smoked paprika allioli$6 whipped salt cod and potato, grilled bread $9 albondigas, saffron,allspice$7 grilled shrimp, lemon, garlic$8 fried calamar, garlic allioli$8 tortilla espafiola$6 paella cake, tomato-saffron$8 daily empanada$8 pork croquetas $7 Paellas vegetarian: seasonal vegetables$18 castellana: beef, pork, chicken $20 marinaera: seasonal shellfish$22 valenciana: surf&turf$24 Lunch Menu soups and salads chilled heirloom tomato soup with crema fresca, black grapes$6 aromatic seafood stew of bass, mussels, clams, saffron.$10 wild arugula with baby tomatoes, hazelnuts, roasted garlic vinaigrette$13 heirloom tomato salad, belgian endive, olive vinaigrette$10 fresh hearts of palm salad,radicchio, lomo ham, parsley, tarragon$9 olive oil marinated spanish tuna with fennel-apple salad$13 petite romaine hearts, garlic dressing, herb croutons, boccarones$10 Sandwiches All served with toasted bread rubbed with raw tomato and garlic, side of arugula and pickled onions (choice of daily side salad or fried potatoes) grilled three cheese$8 jamon serrano and manchego cheese$10 grilled chicken and chorizo$10 conserva tuna salad with herb alicli$9 grilled garlic shrimp$12 braised pork shoulder$11 braised short rib S12 flatbreads three cheeses$8 EXHIBIT F C, D, E27 basil-mint, mahon, black mission figs$9 romesco, pine nuts, manchego, grilled apple, arugula$10 three sausages$11 Dinner Menu first chilled heirloom tomato soup, crema fresca, black grapes$6 aromatic seafood stew of bass, mussels, clams, saffron S10 citrus marinated shrimp, coriander leaf, grilled bread$12 heirloom bean soup, fideo, morcilla, catalunya sausage$13 wild arugula, baby tomatoes, hazelnuts, roasted garlic vinaigrette$13 fresh hearts of palm salad, radicchio, tomo ham, parsley, tarragon $8 olive oil-marinated Spanish tuna, fennel, granny smith apple$13 warm octopus salad, white nectarine, herbs, smoked paprika$12 crispy pork belly, brussels sprouts, fried egg, salbixtada$14 quail stuffed with tart cherries, apricots, chorizo, roasted figs$15 second pan-roasted chicken, endive, apples, salsa verde$21 roast duck breast, beluga lentils, anise spiced pear, sweet-sour strawberries $24 braised short rib, olive oil crushed potato, red wine reduction $23 12 oz hb-eye steak, patatas bravas, gallego sauce$25 dessert menu • crema catalana custard with orange essence$7 chilled cinnamon rice pudding candied pecans, caramel$7 bitter chocolate mousse Spanish sea salt, e.v. olive oil$7 bar celona split creme brulee, chocolate, & coffee ice cream fried banana, whipped cream $9 selection of ice cream or sorbets daily selections$7 seasonal fruit crisp for two$10 (Please note that the prices and menu options listed here are subject to change without notice) • C, D, E28 Aiavar L. DENN LIcHtEL-Alavor PruTm.SAV( SI1AGN0L0 `,. .� ,• t Council: fmbe-rs WILL1A&i T. ,A.LEXANI�ER,CHUCY. E3UQLfET, DIANE WILLIAMS Ci:v Afa qer IOHN R. GILLISON 't THE CTTy OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DHO 1kri CLTCAMONGA June 19, 2012 Thomas Winery Plaza Attn: Michael Chesser 7945 Vineyard Avenue, Suite 0-5 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9173 SUBJECT: MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2012-00536-THOMAS WINERY PLAZA LLC-A request for a minor exception to reduce the required parking for the Thomas Winery Plaza by 20 percent throughout the entire shopping center within the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District(Subarea 2),located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue-APN: 0208-101-22 through 25. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. Dear Mr. Chesser: The Planning Department has reviewed your application for a Minor Exception. Based upon plan review and/or site inspection, staff has made the following findings: 1. The application applies to the parcels within the Specialty Commercial(SC) District,Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard District, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue-APN: 0208-101-22 through 25. 2. This proposed reduction of the required on-site parking is required to permit the existing and any additional food uses on-site. The proposed uses require 583 parking spaces to adhere to the Development Code requirements. A Parking Analysis prepared by Clyde E. Sweet and Associates on May 30, 2012, was submitted by the applicant and it indicates that at peak demand it is estimated that the shopping center will only utilize 468 of the 511 parking spaces that are currently located on the site. 3. The reduction is necessary to allow for the property owner to have flexibility with the types of tenants that can occupy the spaces within the center and compete with the shopping centers that surround the site. 4. The Development Code allows for a Minor Exception procedure for the consideration of reducing the maximum number of required on-site parking spaces from 583 to 468 spaces, pursuant to Section 17.040.050. This application contemplates a 20 percent reduction which will provide a surplus of parking and allow for flexibility with proposed users. 5. As required by Section 17.04.050 of the Development Code, all property owners contiguous to the subject property were notified by mail regarding this applicant's request. A ten-calendar day comment period was provided; no comments were received. The above findings of fact support the necessary findings that are required by the City's Development Code and are listed below: 1. That the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the General EXHIBIT G • .`)()SII {'•7 1"1)()- 47 •t:w^.:i iR�..ltti C, D, E29 APPROVAL LETTER • MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00536— THOMAS WINERY PLAZA LLC June 19, 2012 Page 2 Plan and intent of the Development Code as the reduction of on-site parking provides flexibility to allow potential tenants of various uses to occupy the center without creating a deficiency in parking as the parking analysis states. 2. That there are exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. There are only two small areas where parcels are zoned with the Specialty Commercial District designation. These sites already limit the type of uses that can be conducted, and the parking requirement restricts them even more. 3. That the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the same district. The Property owner would be limited in the types of tenants that could occupy the site. 4. That the granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Therefore, your request has been approved subject to the following conditions: • 1 Approval is for the reduction of required on-site parking by 20 percent or from 583 parking spaces to 468 parking spaces. The site contains 511 usable parking spaces at the Thomas Winery Plaza located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue-APN: 0208-101-22 through 25. 2. The applicant shall comply with all applicable codes and obtain the necessary Building Permits from the Building and Safety Department. 3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4. Prior to any use of the project site, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all se ctions Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community orLSpecific Plans n of'.he Development effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. This decision shall be final following aten-day appeal Period. Any eals to the Secretary of the Planning Commission along with a $2,050 filing fee.hall be made in writing C, D, E30 i APPROVAL LETTER MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00536—THOMAS WINERY PLAZA LLC June 19, 2012 Page 3 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Steve Fowler at (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Sincerely, PLANNING DEPARTMENT effr y A. om, Interim Planning Director JAB:SF/ge C, D, E31 RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00057, A REQUEST TO OPERATE A 7,597 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT AND BAR WITH ENTERTAINMENT AND OUTDOOR DINING IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT(SUBAREA 2), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE AT 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-APN: 0208-101-23;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. SSB Partners Inc., filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of July 11, 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: and resolved by the Planning 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 11, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of approximately 405 feet along Vineyard Avenue depth of approximately 297 feet. The entire center has street frontages es of arcel a 08-101-23), and a lot along Vineyard Avenue, and a 9 approximately 744 feet approximately 560 feet along both San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard, which is presently improved with an existing shopping center consisting of pad buildings, inline tenant buildings, parking areas, and landscaping; and b. The properties to the north consist of both office and single-family residences in the Office and Low-Medium zoning Districts respectively,to the south is a commercial strip center and gas station in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District(Subarea 2)to the east and west are shopping centers in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District(Subarea 2), and the subject property is in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District(Subarea 2); and C. The applicant is proposing to operate a restaurant and bar with entertainment and • outdoor eating areas totaling 7,597 square feet at the Thomas Winery Plaza in the historic Thomas Winery building; and C, D, E32 I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057—SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 2 d. The applicant is concurrently processing Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 in order to allow live bands, dancing, a disc jockey and karaoke. The partnership is also processing Minor Development Review DRC2012-00696 to allow for the construction of the outdoor dining area on the north side of the building; and e. The restaurant with full bar service is a conditionally permitted use in the Specialty Commercial District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code,and the purposes of the district in which the site is located.The proposed use is in,accordance with General Plan Policy LU-1.3 that encourages commercial centers to provide a broad range of retail and service needs for the community. With the addition of the restaurant and bar with outdoor dining to the shopping center, the shopping center can expand its services and attract a wider range of residents. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as conditions have been imposed to ensure the proper service of alcohol to patrons, and the building complies with all applicable Fire and Building Codes. C. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code as the use occupies an existing building that is in conformance with the Development Code as it relates to parking, setbacks, height, etc., and sufficient conditions have been imposed to ensure that the use will comply with the Performance Standards set forth in Section 17.10.050 of the Development Code and will not create adverse impacts upon adjacent uses. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 -Existing Facilities because the project does not result in any major interior or exterior alterations. In addition,there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto'and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is hereby granted for the operation, sale and service of alcoholic beverages(i.e., beer,wine, and distilled spirits)in conjunction with a 7,597 square foot restaurant and bar with outdoor dining in the Specialty Commercial District of Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard C, D, E33 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057—SBC PARTNERS INC • July 11, 2012 Page 3 District, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue at 8916 Foothill Boulevard—APN: 0208-101-23. The restaurant use shall be a"bona fide eating place"as defined in California Business and Professions Code Section 23038. 2) Entertainment shall not be provided without a valid Entertainment Permit. The business shall comply with all conditions of approval for such Entertainment Permit, including without limitation the hours of operation set forth in the Entertainment Permit. 2) Approval of this Conditional Use Permit to allow a bar and service of alcoholic beverages with meals shall be contingent upon the applicant's ability to secure approval of a Type 47 Liquor License issued by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for this location. 3) The days and hours of operation shall be limited to Friday and Saturday: 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. and Sundays through Thursday: 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. 4) The business shall adhere to all requirements of the security plan that was provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as part of this • application. The requirements can not be modified without prior written approval by the Planning Department and Police Department. 5) The sale of alcohol shall cease no less than thirty(30)minutes before the closing time. 6) Alcohol sales shall not exceed 50 percent of gross receipts for the business. The business owner shall provide the City with an audited report including receipts for all sales upon request. Violation of this condition will result in Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 being brought before the Planning Commission for review and possible revocation. 7) The restaurant operator shall adhere to all food service requirements and operations regulations for a Type 47 License as prescribed by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Failure to abide by all applicable ABC Regulations or all Conditions of Approval shall result in Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 being brought before the Planning Commission for review. Review by the Planning Commission for non-compliance with ABC Regulations or Conditions of Approval may result in evidentiary hearing(s), modification(s) to Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 and possible termination of use. 8) If the approved operation of the business creates lawenforcement and/or fire safety problems, such as, but not limited to, loitering and • disturbances, noise, overcrowding, intoxication at the premises, blocked fire exits, etc., the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought C, D, E34 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057—SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 4 before the Planning Commission for consideration of modification and/or revocation. 9) This facility shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as identified in the Development Code Section 17.10.050. If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses, residential land uses or operations, this Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use. 10) Applicant shall adhere to all conditions of the previously approved Conditional Use Permit DRC87-26 and it modification 11) All historical artifacts both inside and outside the building shall be inventoried and maintained in place. They shall be protected while any construction activities are occurring within the vicinity of these artifacts. The conveyor may be moved from its current location with the approval and consultation with the Planning Director and the Building Official. 12) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City,its agents, officers,or employees,because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City,its agents,officers,or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees, which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 13) Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. 14) The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the Building and Safety Department and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to operation. 15) No modifications to the floor plan or intensification of the use shall be permitted without prior review and approval by the Planning Commission. 16) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 17) This Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C, D, E35 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 • DRC2012-00057 — SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 5 18) Applicant shall include information about the history of the Thomas Winery and still building in the food and drink menu. Alcohol Service: 19) Applicant must use an identity card scanner (ID Scanner)anytime the premises is selling alcoholic beverages and has entertainment as defined by Section 5.12 of the Municipal Code. (Definition of ID Scanner: An ID Scanner automates and documents the age verification process by scanning the ID through a card reader). The ID Scanner should record and timestamp the name, identification number, and date of birth on the identity card provided by patrons. This information should be recorded and maintained for a minimum of thirty (30) days. The business will provide the ID Scanner records to law enforcement upon-request. 20) If persons under 21 years of age are allowed on the premises after midnight, the licensee(s) must utilize separate types of glassware to distinguish alcoholic drinks from non-alcoholic drinks. Additionally, persons over 21 years of age shall have a unique mark or symbol applied to the backside their hand that readily identifies them as a • person who can be served an alcoholic drink. 21) Patrons who appear obviously intoxicated shall not be served any alcoholic beverages. 22) There shall be no promotions encouraging intoxication or drinking contests or advertisements indicating "Buy one drink, get one free," "Two for the price of one," or "All you can drink for ..." or similar language. 23) There shall be no "stacking" of drinks, i.e.. more than one drink at a time, to a single patron. 24) Except for wine bottles, oversized containers or pitchers containing in excess of 25 ounces of an alcoholic drink shall not be sold to a single patron for their sole consumption. 25) The sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises is strictly prohibited. 26) Employees and contract security personnel shall not consume any alcoholic beverages during their work shift. 27) A file containing the names and dates of employment of every person serving alcoholic beverages for consumption by patrons on the licensed premises and every manager shall be kept on the premises. The file shall also include a copy of each person's certificate of • completion of the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control L.E.A.D. course (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) or equivalent. Upon request, said file shall be made available for review to C, D, E36 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057—SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 6 representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. New employees will have 90 days from date of employment to obtain L.E.A.D. certification or equivalent. 28) There shall be a Designated Driver. Program wherein there is an incentive to the person not drinking alcoholic beverages, who is in a group of three or more, to be the designated driver for that group of patrons. Said Designated Driver Program.shall be identified in all menus and provided on interior signage. 29) There shall be a taxi-ride program where the establishment will offer to call a taxi for patrons when it seems appropriate. Phone numbers of local taxi companies shall be prominently posted for viewing by patrons. Security: 30) Except in case of emergency, the licensee shall not permit its patrons to enter or exit the licensed premises through any entrance/exit other than the primary entrance/exit, excluding entrances/exits from patio areas. Steps shall be taken by the licensee to discourage unauthorized exiting. 31) Any patron who (1) fights or challenges another person to fight, (2) maliciously and willfully disturbs another person by loud or unreasoned noise,or(3)uses offensive words which are inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction shall be removed from the premises. 32) An incident log shall be maintained at the licensed premises on a continual basis with at least one year of entries and be readily available for inspection by a police officer. The log is for recording any physical altercations, injuries, and objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance occurring in, on, or at the licensed premises, including the. immediately adjacent area that is owned, leased. or rented by the licensee. The log will indicate date, time, description of incident, and action taken. "Objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance' means disturbance of the peace, public drunkenness, drinking in public, harassment of passersby, gambling, prostitution, loitering, public urination, lewd conduct,drug trafficking,or excessive loud noise. 33) Security personnel required by the Entertainment Permit issued for the licensed premises shall be in a uniform or clothing that is readily identifiable as a security person. They shall maintain order and enforce the establishment's no loitering policy and shall take "reasonable steps" (as that term is defined in subparagraph (3) of Section 24200 of the California Business and Professions Code) to correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance. 34) The owner or manager of the licensed premises shall maintain on the premises a written security,policy and procedures manual addressing at a minimum the following items. Handling obviously intoxicated C, D, E37 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 • DRC2012-00057—SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 7 persons; establishing a reasonable ratio of employees to patrons, based upon activity level, in order to monitor beverage sales and patron behavior; handling patrons involved in fighting or arguing; handling loitering about the building and in the immediate adjacent area that is owned, leased, rented, or used under agreement by the Licensee(s); verifying age/checking identification of patrons; warning patrons of reaching their drinking limit/potential intoxication and refusing to serve; calling the police regarding observed or reported criminal activity. 35) Contract security services shall be familiar with the establishment's written security policy and procedures; by reviewing them and signing they have read and understood the policy. The signed acknowledgement shall be kept in a file relating to the security manual. 36) Prior to utilizing a contract security guard company, the establishment shall verify the security company has a current City of Rancho Cucamonga business license. 37) Install a closed circuit television system capable of readily identifying facial features and stature of all patrons entering the establishment • during hours of entertainment. Videos are to be recorded,and a library of events shall be kept and available for inspection by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. Fire Department: FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT 1) Submit plans to Building and Safety for fire review; include in the plans a copy of the CA Fire code Chapter 14 for "Fire Safety During Construction and Demolition." The plans shall provide the building data such as square footage (existing and proposes) type of construction, occupancy group(s), the number of stories and indicate if the building is equipped with automatic fire sprinklers". An Assembly Use Permit per the Fire Code will be required. Provide the following notes in the plans: BEFORE CALLING FOR INSPECTION PLEASE COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 2) A fire inspection and final approval is required before the Building Department will accept a building final inspection request. To schedule a fire inspection, please call (909) 477-2777 or go on-line at www.rctops.org . Fire Construction Services (FCS) personnel can be reached at (909) 477-2713. • 3) A Knox box must be purchased and installed in accordance with RCFPD policy, unless the Knox box already exists on the building.The C, D, E38 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057—SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 8 policy and Knox box application are available at the Building and Safety counter. 4) The key to the building or suite must be given to the fire inspector at the time of final inspection. The key will be locked in the Knox box for fire department emergency access. 5) Fire extinguishers must be installed per the RCFPD policy. The policy is available at the Building and Safety counter. 6) The occupant must fill out the blue FCS's "Emergency Contact Information' form prior to final inspection. Present the completed form to the fire inspector at the time of final fire inspection. The form is available at the Building and Safety counter. 7) If sprinkler modifications are required a separate plan must be submitted for review and approval. Work shall not commence until a permit is obtained. Inspection of rough piping must be performed prior to concealment. Ceiling tiles must not be installed until the rough piping is approved by the fire inspector. 8) If an automatic or manual fire alarm system (including fire sprinkler monitoring,) installation, repair or modifications are required, plans must be submitted separately for review and approval. Fire alarm work shall not commence until a permit is obtained. 9) If a type I hood for commercial cooking is installed, a fixed fire suppression system is required;plans must be submitted separately for review and approval. Work shall not commence until a permit is obtained. 10) If the building is equipped with automatic fire sprinklers the general contractor must confirm that the 5-year certification of the fire sprinkler system is current. The certificate must be affixed to the system riser. If the system is not certified, the General Contractor must contact the building owner. A qualified company must certify the system prior to final inspection. 11) The suite address must be installed on all exterior doors of the suite in 4-inch high letters contrasting with the background. 12) The duct smoke detectors required by the 2007 CA Mechanical Code for HVAC shut down must not be interconnected to the fire sprinkler monitoring alarm; when the duct detectors are not installed in a normally occupied space they must be equipped with an audible and visual notification device including a test and reset controls in accordance to the 2007 CA Fire Code. 13) Fire safety during construction and demolition must be observed; please, familiarize yourself and your employees with the CA Fire Code chapter 14 regulations. C, D, E39 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057- SBC PARTNERS INC July 1.1, 2012 Page 9 14) False alarms which summon the fire department which are caused by construction personnel will be charged a false alarm fee by the fire department. 15) The approval of these plans does not constitute approval of any building or fire code violation. Any code violation observed by the fire inspector must be corrected before and occupancy clearance is granted by Fire Construction Services. 16) The approval of these plans does not include work that may be shown on the plans which is not in the scope of the permit issued. Hazardous materials (including wholesale and retail exempt amounts), fire suppression/fire detection systems, merchandise display fixtures, storage racks, warehouse storage, production processes and/or equipment installation are explicitly excluded from this approval and will require separate plan check submittal and Fire Code permits. Engi-- neenna 1) Construction and demolition Deposit/Administration Fee-If valuation is over$100,000. • 6• The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2012. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -�. 7 Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: � �,� - Can a Bumett, Senior Planner I, Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2012, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: WIMBERLY ® ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE C, D, E40 J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �,.-;�,`�, - DEPARTMENT 1 STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2012-00057 AND DRC2012-00696 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: SSB PARTNERS INC -- LOCATION: 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD—APN: 0208-101-23 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date A. General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,officers,or employees,because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolutions of Approval No. 12-31 and 12-11, I I_ Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans(full size). The sheet(s)are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: I a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. SC-12-08 1 C, D, E41 Project No.DRC2012.00057 • Comolei tio�pa{B C. Site Development I. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans,architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department,the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Gardens Master Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. _-- 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be -- submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. D. Shopping Centers 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours.0 3. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an _ p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the /—/— exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading-No person shall cause the loading,unloading,opening,closing,or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other -- similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m.and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or I _ projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent Properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2 C, D, E42 Project No.ORC2012-00057 Completion Date F. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1. Submit five completesets of plans including the following:. —/—/— a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets,detached)including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics,underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e.,ORC2010-00355 and DRC2010-00356)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/—/— Architects/Engineers stamp and"wet' signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. �-- 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Department. H. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number(i.e.,DRC2012-00057 and DRC2012-00696). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes,and all other applicable codes,ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday / I_ through Saturday,with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 3. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Departments public counter). 3 C, D, E43 a Project No.DRC20_�57 • Comole`afe �. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code(CBC)for fire-resistive construction. _ 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Provide draft stops in combustible attic areas and concealed space in accordance with CBC. 4. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations and mix — occupancy ratios. 5. Provide documentation and calculation for compliance with the California Energy Standard regulations. 6. 6. Address on the plans the required compliance with the California Accessibility Standards. 7. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. • 4 C, D, E44 0 � 4 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEP_-M-_,HENT LIN DATE: September 24, 2014 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAM0NGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (MODIFICATION) - DRC2014-00774 - SSRB GROUP, INC. - A request to modify an approved Conditional Use Permit (DRC2012-00057) to increase the hours of operation in order to open earlier for an existing restaurant and bar (Sixty6 Sports Lounge) located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue within the Specialty Commercial (SC) Development District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, Suite K1.. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit (Modification) DRC2014-00774, to extend the hours of operation of an existing restaurant and bar and schedule a 6 month review of the business operation to address concerns raised by the Police Department, through the adoption of the attached Resolution of • Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residential/ Offices - Low-Medium Residential/Office South - Commercial strip center and gas station — Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 2) East - Shopping Center- Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 2) West - Shopping Center- Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District, Subarea 2) B. _General Plan Designations:. Project Site —General Commercial North - Office, Low-Medium South - Community Commercial East - General Commercial West - General Commercial C. Project Background: The Planning CommissionC, ' nditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 and Entertainment Permit DRC201 ly. 12, 2012 to operate a restaurant and bar with live entertainment. The busn is a restaurant with a Type 47 alcohol license which permits full service of nd distilled spirits for on- site consumption. The restaurant is required to operate as a bona fide eating place as defined in the California Business and Professions Code Section 23028. The approved hours of operation are Sundays through Thursday from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and Friday and Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. The applicant is requesting to change the hours and open at 9:00 a.m., seven days a week. Per Development Code Section 17.16.120 and per the Conditions of Approval established for the original application EXHIBIT B C, D, E45 r e. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00774 —SSRB GROUP, INC. SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 2 DRC2012-00057 (Exhibit A), a Conditional Use Permit Modification is required before the change can occur. D. Site Characteristics: The existing restaurant and bar is located within the Thomas Winery Plaza in an historic winery building. The subject tenant space comprises a total of 7,597 square foot (5,778 square foot interior space), which includes two patio areas. The. applicant is not proposing any site or floor plan changes. E. Parkins Calculations: The site is adequately parked for the proposed use. The expanded hours do not require any additional parking spaces. Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Restaurant with Bar 7,597 1:100 76 76 and outdoor patios ANALYSIS: A. Project Proposal: The applicant is requesting to expand the hours of operation in order to open at 9:00 a.m., seven day a week. The earlier opening time is being requested to attract patrons to sporting events with early broadcast times. No changes are being requested to the closing time or the times when entertainment is permitted. The new requested hours of operation would be as follows: Friday and Saturday: 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Sundays through Thursday: 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. The Development Code Section 17.16.120 requires the following findings for the approval of a Conditional Use Permit: 1. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. 2. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. 3. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The Development Code Section 17.14.100 (Modification), states that to modify an existing permit that "A permit modification may be granted only when the approving authority makes all findings required for the original approval." The Resolution approving the original approval has been attached as Exhibit A and the draft resolution contains facts to support the required findings for the requested modification. C, D, E46 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • DRC2014-00774—SSRB GROUP, INC. SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 3 B. Public Safety: Staff met with the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department (RCPD) to discuss Sixty6 Sports Lounge's current operation on September 3, 2014 and intended change of hours. At the meeting, the RCPD raised concerns regarding violations of the approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and the excessive number of police calls-for- service to the subject location. The RCPD recommended that the applicant's request for additional hours of operation not be granted until they were able to comply with the Conditions of Approval and there was a reduction in the calls-for-service. The CUP violations identified by the Police Department include having outside speakers, flashing lights, doors open during entertainment, improper number of security guards and not using the required ID scanner on entertainment nights. Two special events were held without the required Temporary Use Permit. Exhibit B outlines the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department calls for service and Exhibit C specifically notes violations of the Conditional Use Permit as identified by the Police Department A.C.T. Team. Staff has included a condition in the Resolution of Approval requiring a progress review within the next 6 months to ensure that the applicant successfully addresses these recent violations and adheres to the Conditions of Approval, C. Compatibility of Use: The proposed expansion of the hours of operation should not affect the surrounding business as the activities will take place entirely within the building and • there is adequate parking. D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section15301 - Existing Facilities. Because the project only involves expanding the hours of operation to open earlier, staff concludes that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence or phone calls have been received with respect to the application requests. Respectfully submitted, Je rey A. Bloom DCM Economic and Community Development JAB:TV/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Staff Report and Resolution of Approval for DRC2012-00057 dated July 11, 2012 (with attachments) C, D, E47 r' l PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00774—SSRB GROUP, INC. SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 4 Exhibit B - List of RCPD Calls-for-Service Exhibit C - Conditional Use Permit Violations Exhibit D - Applicant Letter of Request Exhibit E - Letter from Thomas Winery Plaza Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit (Modification) DRC2014-00774 C, D, E48 JOHN McMAHON,SHERIFF-CORONER Date: September 17, 2014 To: Jeff Bloom, City of Rancho Cucamonga From: Deputy Janna Kovensky, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Deputy Jason Whitsell and I (Deputy Janna Kovensky) are currently assigned to the Alcohol Compliance Team (A.C.T.) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The primary functions of our position are: to monitor and enforce all ABC Laws, monitor crimes committed at licensed alcohol establishments, continuous business inspections (alcohol establishments), first point of contact for all city departments, primary investigators of city ordinance violations, and prepare reports, citations or arrests as appropriate. On a regular basis, we conduct random inspections of locations that serve alcohol to ensure they are following ABC laws, their conditional use permits, and their entertainment permits. The following statistics are for Sixty-Six Sports Lounge located at 8916 Foothill Blvd # KI Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Total Calls for service 06/0 /13-09'03/14: 30 • False alarm calls: 17 • Murder: 1 (Occurred in the parking lot behind the 66, suspects came from 66, one victim deceased) • Assault with a deadly weapon: 1 (Occurred in the parking lot behind the 66, suspects came from 66, one victim stabbed, related to the murder) • Fights: 3 • Noise issues: 3 • DUI's from location: Approximately 6 • False alarm calls from Coffee Klatch since 66 opened: 6 • Before 66 opened: 0 ABC Violations • Not posting necessary ABC signage (Cancer/pregnancy signs). • 3 separate occasions with adulterated alcohol (2 citation issues). • Refusal to post ABC and Business license. It took 3 inspections and a citation for q1 Il not posting the business license before thev would post it. EXHIBIT B I BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT California 92415-0061 Post Office Box 569 o San Bernardino, California 92402-0569 C, D, E49 r JOHN McMAHON,SHERIFF-CORONER Date: September 17, 2014 To: Jeff Bloom, City of Rancho Cucamonga From: Deputy Janna Kovensky, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Deputy Jason Whitsell and I (Deputy Janna Kovensky) are currently assigned to the Alcohol Compliance Team (A.C.T.) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The primary functions of our position are: to monitor and enforce all ABC Laws, monitor crimes committed at licensed alcohol establishments, continuous business inspections (alcohol establishments), first point of contact for all city departments, primary investigators of city ordinance violations, and prepare reports, citations or arrests as appropriate. On a regular basis, we conduct random inspections of locations that serve alcohol to ensure they are following ABC laws, their conditional use permits, and their entertainment permits. Violations of their conditional use permit • Refusal to post ABC and Business license-It took 3 inspections and a citation for not posting the business license before they would post it. • Not using ID scanner on entertainment nights. • 05/24/14: Car show in the parking lot with alcohol and no permit. • 06/26/14: During World Cup Soccer, opened early. Violations of entertainment permit • They have outside speakers which cause noise issues and projects the entertainment from inside outside of the location. • Flashing lights. • All doors open during entertainment—must be closed. • Not using 7 security guards. • Business and licensing admission tax always paid late. y 3AN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT Jino,California 92415-0061 Post Office Box 569 • San Bernardino,California 92402-0569 EXHIBIT C C, D, E50 f ssrze crrzou?, INC. • 8916 Foothill Blvd Suite K1 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 909-466-9900 Date: August 26, 2014 Planning Commission City Of Rancho Cucamonga California. Re: Opening Hours We are requesting you to amend our CUP to state that we can open our business at 9 am everyday at our Sixty6 Sports lounge located at 8916 Foothill Blvd Suite K1 Rancho Cucamonga. . The reason for this request is to make sure that we can be open to our patrons for all the sporting events that are taking place in the world.We lost a lot of business with the World Cup starting the games at 9. The NFL starts its games at loam, so we would like to be open and 9 and make sure we get our customers enough time to come and get situated prior to the starting of the games. •We would really appreciate your help in this matter. Please feel free to contact me for any concerns. Sincerely, Wobb edi �G 7b-e7(11-1 EXHIBIT C, D, E51 Thomas Winery Plaza Property Owner, LLC 7945 Vineyard Avenue, Suite D-5 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730' phone 805.604.2640 fox 805.604.2641 August 27, 2014 Bobby Bedi Sixty 6 8916 Foothill Blvd, Suite K-1 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Modification of business hours for Suite K=1 Dear Mr. Bedi, Please accept this letter as Landlord's consent to modify business hours at Sixty 6 Restaurant, located at 8916 Foothill Blvd,Ste. K-1, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, to allow business to open at 9:00, seven days a week. If you have questions, please don't hesitate to call our office at 909-945-0505 or 805-604-2640. Sincerely, Thomas Winery Plaza Property Owner, LLC Michael Chesser Manager �c 9/vxy/ry EXHIBIT IE C, D, E52 . c RESOLUTION NO. 12-31 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00057, A REQUEST TO OPERATE A 7,597 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT AND BAR WITH ENTERTAINMENT AND OUTDOOR DINING IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT(SUBAREA 2), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUEAT 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-APN: 0208-101-23;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. SSB Partners Inc., filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of July 11, 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows- 1. ollows:1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 11, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a. The application applies to the property located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of approximately 405 feet along Vineyard Avenue (parcel 0208-101-23), and a lot depth of approximately 297 feet. The entire center has street frontages of approximately 744 feet along Vineyard Avenue, and approximately 560 feet along both San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard; which is presently improved with an existing shopping center consisting of pad buildings, inline tenant buildings, parking areas, and landscaping; and b. The properties to the north consist of both office and single-family residences in the Office and Low-Medium zoning Districts respectively, to the south is a commercial strip center and gas station in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 2) to the east and west are shopping centers in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District(Subarea 2), and the subject property is in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 2); and • C. The applicant is proposing to operate a restaurant and bar with entertainment and outdoor eating areas totaling 7,597 square feet at the Thomas Winery Plaza in the historic Thomas Winery building; and EXHIBIT C C, D, E53 PLANNING COMMISSION'S.SOLUTION NO. 12-31 I DRC2012-00057—SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 2 d. The applicant is concurrently processing Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 in order to allow live bands, dancing, a disc jockey and karaoke. The partnership is also processing Minor Development Review DRC2012-00696 to allow for the construction of the outdoor dining area on the north side of the building: and e. The restaurant with full bar service is a conditionally permitted use in the Specialty Commercial District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during_the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located.The proposed use is in accordance with General Plan Policy LU-1.3 that encourages commercial centers to provide a broad range of retail and service needs for the community. With the addition of the restaurant and bar with outdoor dining to the shopping center, the shopping center can expand its services and attract a wider range of residents. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as conditions have been imposed to ensure the proper service of alcohol to patrons, and the building complies with all applicable Fire and Building Codes. C. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code as the use occupies an existing building that is in conformance with the Development Code as it relates to parking, setbacks, height, etc., and sufficient conditions have been imposed to ensure that the use will comply with the Performance Standards set forth in Section 17.10.050 of the Development Code and will not create adverse impacts upon adjacent uses. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 -Existing Facilities because the project does not result in any major interior or exterior alterations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached.hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is hereby granted for the operation, sale and service of alcoholic beverages (i.e., beer, wine, and distilled spirits) in conjunction with a 7,597 square foot restaurant and bar with outdoor dining in the Specialty Commercial District of Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard C, D, E54 PLANNING COMMISSION`t,-SOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057— SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 3 District, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue at 8916 Foothill Boulevard—APN: 0208-101-23. The restaurant use shall be a"bona fide eating place"as defined in California Business and Professions Code Section 23038. 2) Entertainment shall not be provided without a valid Entertainment Permit. The business shall comply with all conditions of approval for such Entertainment Permit, including without limitation the hours of operation set forth in the Entertainment Permit. 2) Approval of this Conditional Use Permit to allow a bar and service of alcoholic beverages with meals shall be contingent upon the applicant's ability to secure approval of a Type 47 Liquor License issued by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for this location. 3) The days and hours of operation shall be limited to Friday and Saturday: 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. and Sundays through Thursday: 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. 4) The business shall adhere to all requirements of the security plan that was provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as part of this • application. The requirements can not be modified without prior written approval by the Planning Department and Police Department. 5) The sale of alcohol shall cease no less than thirty (30) minutes before the closing time. 6) Alcohol sales shall not exceed 50 percent of gross receipts for the business. The business owner shall provide the City with an audited report including receipts for all sales upon request. Violation of this condition will result in Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 being brought before the Planning Commission for review and possible revocation. 7) The restaurant operator shall adhere to all food service requirements and operations regulations for a Type 47 License as prescribed by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Failure to abide by all applicable ABC Regulations or all Conditions of Approval shall result in Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 being brought before the Planning Commission for review. Review by the Planning Commission for non-compliance with ABC Regulations or Conditions of Approval may result in evidentiary hearing(s), modification(s) to Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 and possible termination of use. 8) If the approved operation of the business creates law enforcement and/or fire safety problems, such as, but not limited to, loitering and disturbances, noise, overcrowding, intoxication at the premises, blocked fire exits, etc., the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought C, D, E55 PLANNING COMMISSION--'SOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057— SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 4 before the Planning Commission for consideration of modification and/or revocation. 9) This facility shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as identified in the Development Code Section 17.10.050. If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses, residential land uses or operations, this Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use. 10) Applicant shall adhere to all conditions of the previously approved Conditional Use Permit DRC87-26 and it modification 11) All historical artifacts both inside and outside the building shall be inventoried and maintained in place. They.shall be protected while any construction activities are occurring within the vicinity of these artifacts. The conveyor may be moved from its current location with the approval and consultation with the Planning Director and the Building Official. 12) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers. or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees, which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion; participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 13) Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. 14.) The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the Building and Safety Department and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to operation. 15) No modifications to the floor plan or intensification of the use shall be permitted without prior review and approval by the Planning Commission,. 16) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 17) This Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C, D, E56 PLANNING COMMISSION�',,,zSOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057 — SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 5 • 18) Applicant shall include information about the history of the Thomas Winery and still building in the food and drink menu. Alcohol Service: 19) Applicant must use an identity card scanner(ID Scanner) anytime the premises is selling alcoholic beverages and has entertainment as defined by Section 5.12 of the Municipal Code. (Definition of ID Scanner. An ID Scanner automates and documents the age verification process by scanning the ID through a card reader). The ID Scanner should record and timestamp the name, identification number. and date of birth on the identity card provided by patrons. This information should be recorded and maintained for a minimum of thirty (30) days. The business will provide the ID Scanner records to law enforcement upon request. 20) If persons under 21 years of age are allowed on the premises after midnight. the licensee(s) must utilize separate types of glassware to distinguish alcoholic drinks from non-alcoholic drinks. Additionally, persons over 21 years of age shall have a unique mark or symbol applied to the backside their hand that readily identifies them as a person who can be served an alcoholic drink. • 21) Patrons who appear obviously intoxicated shall not be served any alcoholic beverages. 22) There shall be no promotions encouraging intoxication or drinking contests or advertisements indicating "Buy one drink, get one free," "Two for the price of one," or "All you can drink for ..." or similar language. 23) There shall be no "stacking" of drinks. i.e.; more than one drink at a time, to a single patron. 24) Except for wine bottles, oversized containers or pitchers containing in excess of 25 ounces of an alcoholic drink shall not be sold to a single patron for their sole consumption. 25) The sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises is strictly prohibited. 26) Employees and contract security personnel shall not consume any alcoholic beverages during their work shift. 27) A file containing the names and dates of employment of every person serving alcoholic beverages for consumption by patrons on the licensed premises and every manager shall be kept on the premises. ® The file shall also include a copy of each person's certificate of completion of the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control L.E.A.D. course (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) or equivalent. Upon request, said file shall be made available for review to C, D, E57 PLANNING COMMISSION il•.:SOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057— SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 6 representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. New employees will have 90 days from date of employment to obtain L.E.A.D. certification or equivalent. 28) There shall be a Designated Driver Program wherein there is an incentive to the person not drinking alcoholic beverages: who is in a group of three or more, to be the designated driver for that group of patrons. Said Designated Driver Program shall be identified in all menus and provided on interior signage. 29) There shall be a taxi-ride program where the establishment will offer,to call a taxi for patrons when it seems appropriate. Phone numbers of local taxi companies shall be prominently posted for viewing by patrons. Security: 30) Except in case of emergency, the licensee shall not permit its patrons to enter or exit the licensed premises through any entrance/exit other than the primary entrance/exit, excluding entrances/exits from patio areas. Steps shall be taken by the licensee to discourage unauthorized exiting. 31) Any patron who (1) fights or challenges another person to fight. (2) maliciously and willfully disturbs another person by loud or unreasoned noise, or(3) uses offensive words which are inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction shall be removed from the premises. 32) An incident log shall be maintained at the licensed premises on a continual basis with at least one year of entries and be readily available for inspection by a police officer. The log is for recording any physical altercations, injuries, and objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance occurring in, on, or at the licensed premises, including the immediately adjacent area that is owned, leased, or rented by the licensee. The log will indicate date, time, description of incident. and action taken. "Objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance" means disturbance of the peace, public drunkenness, drinking in public, harassment of passersby" gambling. prostitution, loitering, public urination, lewd conduct, drug trafficking. or excessive loud noise. 33) Security personnel required by the Entertainment Permit issued for the licensed premises shall be in a uniform or clothing that is readily identifiable as a security person. They shall maintain order and enforce the establishment's no loitering policy and shall take `"reasonable steps" (as that term is defined in subparagraph (3) of Section 24200 of the California Business and Professions Code) to correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance. 34) The owner or manager of the licensed premises shall maintain on the premises a written security policy and procedures manual addressing at a minimum the following items: Handling obviously intoxicated C, D, E58 PLANNING COMMISSION;. .cSOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057 — SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 7 persons: establishing a reasonable ratio of employees to patrons. based upon activity level, in order to monitor beverage sales and patron behavior; handling patrons involved in fighting or arguing; handling loitering about the building and in the immediate adjacent area that is owned, leased. rented, or used under agreement by the Licensee(s): verifying age/checking identification of patrons; warning patrons of reaching their drinking limit/potential intoxication and refusing to serve: calling the police regarding observed or reported criminal activity. 35) Contract security services shall be familiar with the establishment's written security policy and procedures: by reviewing them and signing they have read and understood the policy. The signed acknowledgement shall be kept in a file relating to the security manual. 36) Prior to utilizing a contract security guard company, the establishment shall verify the security company has a current City of Rancho Cucamonga business license. 37) Install a closed circuit television system capable of readily identifying facial features and stature of all patrons entering the establishment during hours of entertainment. Videos are to be recorded, and a library • of events shall be kept and available for inspection by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. Fire Department: FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR TENANTIMPROVEMENT 1) Submit plans to Building and Safety for fire review: include in the plans a copy of the CA Fire code Chapter 14 for "Fire Safety During Construction and Demolition." The plans shall provide the building data such as square footage (existing and proposes) type of construction, occupancy group(s), the number of stories and indicate if the building is equipped with automatic fire sprinklers". An Assembly Use Permit per the Fire Code will be required. Provide the following notes in the plans: BEFORE CALLING FOR INSPECTION PLEASE COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 2) A fire inspection and final approval is required before the Building Department will accept a building final inspection request. To schedule a fire inspection, please call (909) 477-2777 or go on-line at www.rctops.org . Fire Construction Services (FCS) personnel can be reached at (909) 477-2713. ® 3) A Knox box must be purchased and installed in actor dance with RCFPD policy, unless the Knox box already exists on the building. The C, D, E59 PLANNING COMMISSION r.,-:SOLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057— SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 8 policy and Knox box application are available at the Building and Safety counter. 4) The key to the building or suite must be given to the fire inspector at the time of final inspection. The key will be locked in the Knox box for fire department emergency access. 5) Fire extinguishers must be installed per the RCFPD policy. The policy is available at the Building and Safety counter. 6) The occupant must fill out the blue FCS's "Emergency Contact Information"form prior to final inspection. Present the completed form to the fire inspector at the time of final fire inspection. The form is available at the Building and Safety counter. 7) If sprinkler modifications are required a separate plan must be submitted for review and approval. Work shall not commence until a permit is obtained. Inspection of rough piping must be performed prior to concealment. Ceiling tiles must not be installed until the rough piping is approved by the fire inspector. 8) If an automatic or manual fire alarm system (including fire sprinkler monitoring,) installation, repair or modifications are required, plans must be submitted separately for review and approval. Fire alarm work shall not commence until a permit is obtained. 9) If a type I hood for commercial cooking is installed, a fixed fire suppression system is required; plans must be submitted separately for review and approval. Work shall not commence until a permit is obtained. 10) If the building is equipped with automatic fire sprinklers the general contractor must confirm that the 5-year certification of the fire sprinkler system is current. The certificate must be affixed to the system riser. If the system is not certified, the General Contractor must contact the building owner. A qualified company must certify the system prior to final inspection. 11) The suite address must be installed on all exterior doors of the suite in 4-inch high letters contrasting with the background. 12) The duct smoke detectors required by the 2007 CA Mechanical Code for HVAC shut down must not be interconnected to the fire sprinkler monitoring alarm; when the duct detectors are .not installed in a normally occupied space they must be equipped with an audible and visual notification device including a test and reset controls in accordance to the 2007 CA Fire Code. 13) Fire safety during construction and demolition must be observed; please.familiarize yourself and your employees with the CA Fire Code chapter 14 regulations. C, D, E60 PLANNING COMMISSION F. OLUTION NO. 12-31 DRC2012-00057 - SBC PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 9 • 14) False alarms which summon the fire department which are caused by construction personnel will be charged a false alarm fee by the fire department. 15) The approval of these plans does not constitute approval of any building or fire code violation. Any code,violation observed by the fire inspector must be corrected before and occupancy clearance is granted by Fire Construction Services. 16) The approval of these plans does not include work that may be shown on the plans which is not in the scope of the permit issued. Hazardous materials (including wholesale and retail exempt amounts), fire suppression/fire detection systems. merchandise display fixtures; storage racks, warehouse storage: production processes and/or equipment installation are explicitly excluded from this approval and will require separate plan check submittal and Fire Code permits. En.gineering: 1) Construction and demolition Deposit/Administration Fee-If valuation is over $100.000. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11 TH DAY OF JULY 2012. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: -7 Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman , ATTEST: Cane Burnett. Senior Planner I, Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced; passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2012, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER. HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: WIMBERLY ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE C, D, E61 f COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2012-00057 AND DRC2012-00696 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: SSB PARTNERS INC LOCATION: 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD —APN: 0208-101-23 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City. its agents, officers. or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or j employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolutions of Approval No. 12-31 and 12-11, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans(full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: Notice r 0 a' os����o. Exemption - $5� A � I B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. i SC-12-08 1 C, D, E62 Project No. DRC2012-00057 CornWetion Date C. Site Development • 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans,architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and ; grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Gardens Master Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ! of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. --- i 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. — 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. D. Shopping Centers 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. I — 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. — • 3. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: I a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading-No person shall cause the loading, unloading,opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m.and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equip projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffs edoma adja cent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. i • 2 C, D, E63 Project No. DRC2012-00057 Completion Date F. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan, C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and I g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., DRC2010-00355 and DRC2010-00356)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. I 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Department. H. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2012-00057 and DRC2012-00696). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes,and all other applicable codes,ordinances, and regulations in effect at.the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 3. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter). 3 C, D, E64 i Project No. DRC2012-00057 Completion Date I. Existing Structures ® 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for fire-resistive construction. � I — 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. I Provide draft stops in combustible attic areas and concealed space in accordance with CBC. 4. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations and mix occupancy ratios. —— 5. Provide documentation and calculation for compliance with the California Energy Standard regulations. ——— 6. Address on the plans the required compliance with the California Accessibility Standards. 7. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. • 4 C, D, E65 RESOLUTION NO. 12-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2012-00058, A REQUEST TO INCLUDE LIVE ENTERTAINMENT SUCH AS BANDS AND DANCING IN CONJUNCTION WITH A 7,597 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT AND BAR IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2), LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE AT 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN: 0208-101-23; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. On May 21, 1986,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. 2. SSB Partners Inc.,filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application." 3. On the 11th day of July, 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found. determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows.- 1. ollows:1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 11, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of parcel 0208-101-23 being approximately 405 feet along Vineyard Avenue, and a lot depth of approximately 297 feet. The entire center has street frontages of approximately 744 feet along Vineyard Avenue, and approximately 560 feet along both San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard, which is presently improved with an existing shopping center consisting of pad buildings, inline tenant buildings, parking areas. and landscaping; and b. The properties to the north consist of both office and single-family residences in the Office and Low-Medium zoning Districts respectively,to the south is a commercial strip center and gas station in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 2), to the east and west are shopping center in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District(Subarea 2),and the subject property is in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 2); and c. The premises or establishment is not.likely to be operated in an illegal,improper or disorderly manner, as sufficient conditions have been imposed to ensure that security provisions are in place to regulate the conduct of patrons to prevent incidents resulting in calls for service; and EXHIBIT C; D, E66 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-32 DRC2012-00058 —SSB PARTNERS INC • July 11, 2012 Page 2 d. The applicant is concurrently processing Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 in order to operate a restaurant with a bar under a Type-47 Alcoholic Beverage Control license. The partnership is also processing Minor Development Review DRC2012-00696 to allow for the construction of the outdoor dining area on the north side of the building: and e. The granting of this application will not create a public nuisance as sufficient conditions have been imposed to ensure that the establishment will operate,in an orderly manner and will prevent incidents resulting in calls for service. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed use is in accordance with General Plan Policy LU-1.3 that encourages commercial centers to provide a broad range of retail and service needs for the community. With the addition of the restaurant and bar with outdoor dining to the shopping center, the shopping center can expand its services and attract a wider range of residents. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as conditions have been imposed to ensure the proper service of alcohol to patrons, and the building complies with all applicable Fire and Building Codes. C. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code as the use occupies an existing building that is in conformance with the Development Code as it relates to parking, setbacks, height, etc., and sufficient conditions have been imposed to ensure that the use will comply with the Performance Standards set forth in Section 17.10.050 of the Development Code and will not create adverse impacts upon adjacent uses. d. That the conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare; and e. That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner; and f. That the applicant, or any person associated with him as principal or partner or in a position or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business for which such permit is sought to be issued, has not been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any offense involving the presentation, exhibition, or performance of any obscene show of any kind or of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude or has not had any approval,permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provisions of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years; and g. That granting the application would not create a public nuisance; and h. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding commercial center or adjacent apartment complex; and • i. That the applicant has not made any false. misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. C, D, E67 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-32 DRC2012-00058—SSB PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 3 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301-Existing Facilities because the project does not result in any major interior or exterior alterations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions incorporated herein by this reference: Planning Department 1) Approval is hereby granted to SSB Partners Inc., for an Entertainment Permit which includes live entertainment such as dancing, bands, and karaoke in conjunction with a 7;597 square foot restaurant and bar with entertainment and outdoor dining in the Specialty Commercial.District of Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard (District, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue at 8916 Foothill Boulevard —APN: 0208-101-23. 2) This approval is only for disc jockeys, bands, dancing only in the designated dance area indicated on the submitted plan attached as exhibit "A", and karaoke. The dance floor is limited to 187 square feet. Any change of intensity or type of entertainment shall require a modification to this permit. 3) The days and hours of operation for the entertainment shall be limited to Friday and Saturday: 9:30 p.m.to 2:00 a.m.and Sundays through Thursday: 9:30 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. Any expansion of days and/or hours shall require modification to this permit. 4) An entertainment permit may be transferred or assigned to another person or business entity at the same physical location, provided there is no intensification of the originally approved entertainment use. Any request for transfer of an entertainment permit due to change in ownership shall be submitted in writing. 5) No adult entertainment, as defined in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 17.04.090, shall be permitted. 6) There shall be no flashing lights,disco lights, or similar lighting during the hours of entertainment that prevents the ability to clearly distinguish and identify patrons, security personnel, or other individuals in the restaurant in order to ensure the safety of patrons. 7) Entertainment shall be conducted only inside the building. 8) When entertainment is being conducted,doors and windows shall remain closed for noise attenuation purposes. C, D, E68 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-32 DRC2012-00058 —SSB PARTNERS INC July 11. 2012 Page 4 9) Exterior noise levels shall not exceed 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. and 60 dB during the hours from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. 10) Access to the entertainment area must be from the main entrance to the primary use and not from a separate exterior entrance. Other exits shall be for"Fire Exit Only." 11) If operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. 12) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code,or any other City Ordinances, 13) This permit shall be renewed annually by the applicant per Municipal Code Section 5.12.115. 14) The entertainment shall not be intensified without Planning Commission review and approval. The restaurant shall operate and be maintained in accordance • with the Floor Plan as shown in the Staff Report for DRC2012-00058 and as attached to this Resolution (Attachment A) and hereby referenced in the Conditions of Approval. Security: 15) A minimum of 7 duly licensed, certified or trained, and regularly employed security guards from a reputable security firm as approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department shall be required to be on the premises during the hours of entertainment as defined in Condition No.3. The guard shall be in peace officer attire and shall remain on duty in the parking area and outside of the adjacent areas of the facility to avert problems such as loud noise, disorderly conduct from patrons, or anyone in the parking lot, loitering activities, and any other nuisances or disturbances. 16) Except in case of emergency,the licensee shall not permit its patrons to enter or exit the licensed premises through any entrance/exit other than the primary entrance/exit, excluding entrances/exits from patio areas. Steps shall be taken by the licensee to discourage unauthorized exiting. 17) Any patron who (1) fights or challenges another person to fight, (2) maliciously and willfully disturbs another person by loud or unreasoned noise. or (3) uses offensive words which are inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction shall be removed from the premises. • 18) An incident log shall be maintained at the licensed premises on a continual basis with at least one year of entries and be readily available for inspection by a C, D, E69 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-32 DRC2012-00058—SSB PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 5 police officer. The log is for recording any physical altercations, injuries, and objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance. occurring in, on, or at the licensed premises, including the immediately adjacent area that is owned, leased, or rented by the licensee. The log will indicate date, time,description of the incident, and the action taken. "Objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance" means disturbance of the peace, public drunkenness, drinking in public, harassment of passersby, gambling, prostitution, loitering, public urination, lewd conduct, drug trafficking, or excessive loud noise. 19) Security personnel required by the Entertainment Permit issued for the licensed premises shall be in a uniform or clothing which is readily identifiable as a security person. They shall maintain order and enforce the establishment's no loitering policy and shall take "reasonable steps" (as that term is defined in "subparagraph (3) of Section 24200 of the California Business and Professions Code)to correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance. 20) The owner or manager of the licensed premises shall maintain on the premises a written security policy and procedures manual addressing at a minimum the following items: Handling obviously intoxicated persons; establishing a reasonable ratio of employees to patrons, based upon activity level, in order to monitor beverage sales and patron behavior; handling patrons involved in fighting or arguing; handling loitering about the building and in the immediate adjacent area that is owned, leased, rented, or used under agreement by the Licensee(s);verifying age/checking identification of patrons;warning patrons of reaching their drinking limit/potential intoxication and refusing to serve; calling the police regarding observed or reported criminal activity. 21) Contract security services shall be familiar with the establishment's written security policy and procedures; by reviewing them and signing that they have read and understood the policy. The signed acknowledgement shall be kept in a file relating to the security manual. 22) Prior to utilizing a contract security guard company,the establishment shall verify that the security company has a current business license with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 23) Install a closed circuit television system capable of readily identifying facial features and stature of all patrons entering the establishment during hours of entertainment. Videos are to be recorded and a library of events shall be kept and available for inspection by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. Fire District/Building and Safety Department FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT 1) Submit plans to Building and Safety for fire review; include in the plans a copy of the CA Fire code Chapter 14 for "Fire Safety During Construction and C, D, E70 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-32 DRC2012-00058—SSB PARTNERS INC ® July 11, 2012 Page 6 Demolition." The plans shall provide the building data such as square footage (existing and proposes) type of construction, occupancy group(s), and the number of stories and indicate if the building is equipped with automatic fire sprinklers." An Assembly use permit per the fire code will be required. Provide the following notes in the plans: BEFORE CALLING FOR INSPECTION PLEASE COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 2) A fire inspection and final approval is required before the Building Department will accept a building final inspection request. To schedule a fire inspection, please call (909) 477-2777 or go on line at wvvw.rctops.org . Fire Construction Services (FCS) personnel can be reached at (909) 477-2713. 3) A Knox box must be purchased and installed in accordance with RCFPD policy, unless the Knox box already exists on the building. The policy and Knox box application are available at the Building and Safety counter. 4) The key to the building or suite must be given to the fire inspector at the time of final inspection. The key will be locked in the Knox box for fire department emergency access. • 5) Fire extinguishers must be installed per the RCFPD policy. The policy is available at the Building and Safety counter. 6) The occupant must fill out the blue FCS's"Emergency Contact Information"form prior to final inspection. Present the completed form to the fire inspector at the time of final fire inspection. The form is available at the Building and Safety counter. 7) If sprinkler modifications are required a separate plan must be submitted for review and approval. Work shall not commence until a permit is obtained. Inspection of rough piping must be performed prior to concealment. Ceiling tiles must not be installed until the rough piping is approved by the fire inspector. 8) If an automatic or manual fire alarm system(including fire sprinkler monitoring) installation, repair or modifications are required, plans must be submitted separately for review and approval. Fire alarm work shall not commence until a permit is obtained. 9) If a Type I hood for commercial cooking is installed, a fixed fire suppression system is required; plans must be submitted separately for review and approval. Work shall not commence until a permit is obtained. 10) If the building is equipped with automatic fire sprinklers the general contractor must confirm that the 5-year certification of the fire sprinkler system is current. The certificate must be affixed to the system riser. If the system is not certified, • the General Contractor must contact the building owner. A qualified company must certify the system prior to final inspection. C, D, E71 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-32 DRC2012-00058— SSB PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 7 11) The suite address must be installed on all exterior doors of the suite in 4-inch high letters contrasting with the background. 12) The duct smoke detectors required by the 2007 CA Mechanical Code for HVAC shut down must not be interconnected to the fire sprinkler monitoring alarm; when the duct detectors are not installed in a normally occupied space they must be equipped with an audible and visual notification device including a test and reset controls in accordance to the 2007 CA Fire Code. 13) Fire safety during construction and demolition must be observed; please, familiarize yourself and your employees with the CA Fire Code chapter 14 regulations. 14) False alarms which summon the fire department which are caused by construction personnel will be charged a false alarm fee by the fire department. 15) The approval of these plans does not do not constitute approval of any building or fire code violation.Any code violation observed by the fire inspector must be corrected before and occupancy clearance is granted by Fire Construction Services. 16) The approval of these plans does not include work that may be shown on the plans which is not in the scope of the permit issued. Hazardous. materials (including wholesale and retail exempt amounts),fire suppression/fire detection systems, merchandise display fixtures, storage racks, warehouse storage, production processes and/or equipment installation are explicitly excluded from this approval and will require separate plan check submittal and Fire Code permits. 17) The maximum number of occupants shall not exceed building and fire codes. The maximum occupancy for each room shall be posted as determined by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and/or the City's Fire Prevention Unit Department. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2012. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. �y�C Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: Candyt'tui-F—etf, Senior Planner C, D, E72 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-32 DRC2012-00058—SSB PARTNERS INC July 11, 2012 Page 8 I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2012, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: WIMBERLY ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • C, D, E73 Al Qjtl ----------- z ,r �- LJ L--J Wlice L.J Ly rr a. W LI) F- E.SIIIIG 0 -, ULAN Up V) Q. KOCHE N: C) -T PREPARAIPUN•AREA EXIS-G 51PA41TION *ALL .......... .OwL.3 31 FM ig All. oil m� I CUP 01 U . H-11 E Em OEM T_ .................: A, Al Al Al all IN 11-10MAS W!PAEP.'!' ':I-AZA PROPOSFD RESIAURANT co—o Po)RC. tu FLOOR P! AN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L-� sr' DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2012-00058 SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT APPLICANT: SSB PARTNERS INC LOCATION: 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD —APN: 0208-101-23 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,officers,or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or I employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole , discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 12-32, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s)are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. i 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing.- a) earing:a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X I • SC-12-08 1 C, D, E75 Project No. DRC2012-00058 Completion Date B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans,architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department,the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Gardens Master Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all I other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 2 l:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2012 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2012-00058 EP StdCond 7-11.doc C, D, E76 RESOLUTION NO. 14-42 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2014-00774, A REQUEST TO MODIFY AN APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (DRC2012-00057) TO INCREASE THE HOURS OF OPERATION IN ORDER TO OPEN EARLIER FOR AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AND BAR(SIXTY6 SPORTS LOUNGE) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE WITHIN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL (SC) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AT 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUITE K1 - APN: 0208-101-23; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. SSRB Group Inc., filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit (Modification) DRC2014-00774, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 24, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of approximately 405 feet along Vineyard Avenue (parcel 0208-101-23), and a lot depth of approximately 297 feet. The entire center has street frontages of approximately 744 feet along Vineyard Avenue, and approximately 560 feet along both San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard, which is presently improved with an existing shopping center consisting of pad buildings, inline tenant buildings, parking areas, and landscaping; and b. The properties to the north consist of both office and single-family residences in the Office and Low-Medium zoning Districts respectively, to the south is a commercial strip center and gas station in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 2) to the east and west are shopping centers in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District(Subarea 2), and the subject property is in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 2); and C. The applicant proposes expanding hours of operation in order too en at 9:00 a.m. seven days per week, for the operation of a restaurant and bar with entertainment and outdoor eating areas totaling 7,597 square feet at the Thomas Winery Plaza in the historic Thomas Winery EXH1131T E C, D, E77 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-42 DRC2014-00774—SSRB GROUP, INC. September 24, 2014 Page 2 building; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. Restaurants with bars are permitted within the Specialty Commercial (SC) Development District with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (Development Code Table 17.30.030-1). Modification of an approved Conditional Use Permit, including changes in the hours of operation, require that the project be reviewed and approved by the same approving authority as the original permit (Development Code Section 17.14.100). The existing business is in accordance with General Plan Policy LU-1.3 which encourages commercial centers to provide a broad range of retail and service needs for the community. The project site is in conformance with the Development Code as it relates to parking, setbacks, height, etc. b. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The existing business occupies a building that is in conformance with the Development Code as it relates to parking,setbacks, height, etc., and conditions of approval have been imposed to ensure that the use will comply with the Performance Standards set forth in Section 17.66.050 of the Development Code and will not create adverse impacts upon adjacent uses. C. Granting the modification would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Conditions have been imposed to ensure the proper service of alcohol to patrons, and the building complies with all applicable Fire and Building Codes. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project.is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section15301 - Existing Facilities. Because the project only involves expanding the hours of operation to open earlier, staff concludes that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. C, D, E78 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-42 DRC2014-00774—SSRB GROUP, INC. September 24, 2014 • Page 3 Planning Department 1) Approval is hereby granted to expand the hours of operation as stated in Condition of Approval No. 3 to open at 9:00 a.m., seven days per week, for the operation, sale and service of alcoholic beverages (i.e., beer, wine, and distilled spirits) in conjunction with a 7,597 square foot restaurant and bar with outdoor dining in the Specialty Commercial District of Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard District, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue at 8916 Foothill Boulevard—APN: 0208-101-23. The restaurant use shall be a "bona fide eating place" as defined in California Business and Professions Code Section 23038. 2) All Conditions of Approval, except for hours of operation, related to Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 and Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 remain in effect. 3) The days and hours of operation shall be limited to Friday and Saturday: 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. and Sundays through Thursday: 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. 4) The Planning Commission will conduct a review of the business operations within 6 months of the date of this resolution to confirm the business is operating fully within the conditions set forth by the original Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 and this modification DRC2014-00774. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: _ ,09J'effogeA. Bloom, DCM I, Jeffrey A. Bloom, Deputy City Manager Economic & Community Development of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: C, D, E79 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-42 DRC2014-00774— SSRB GROUP, INC. September 24, 2014 Page 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ,OAXACA,WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE C, D, E80 • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE MINUTES OF C; cHO oNrA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California • I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 PM Roll Call Chairman Wimberly X Vice Chairman Oaxaca X Munoz X Howdysheil X Fletcher X Additional Staff Present.• Jeff Bloom, Deputy City ManagerlEconomic and Community Development; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary, Tabe van der Zwaag,Associate Planner, Dominic Peru Assistant Planner II. ANNOUNCEMENTS At their meeting of-August 27,2014,the Commission selected Commissioner Wimberly to serve as Chairman and Commissioner Oaxaca to serve as Vice Chairman. They will serve for a one year term on both the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning Commission which is reviewed annually per the Planning Commission Administrative Guidelines. Please welcome Chairman Wimberly and Vice Chairman Oaxaca to their new positions on the Commission and thank Commissioners Howdysheli and Fletcher for their prior leadership and service in this capacity. Chairman Wimberly announced that the v orkshop scheduled for this evening is canceled at the • request of the applicant. Commissioner Munoz vvelcomed back Commissioner Fletcher. EXHIBIT F C, D, E81 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION cpt= MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 2 Commissioner Fletcher thanked staff, the City Council and the Fire Department for the cards and flowers. III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This Is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission an any Item rested or not rsted an the agenda. State law pmhnbb the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Conunisslon mayreceive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limiled to five minutes per Individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak AU communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This Is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrah from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging In any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Approval of Adjourned Meeting(Workshop)Minutes dated August 13,2014 B. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated August 27,2014 C. Approval of Adjourned Meeting(Workshop)Minutes dated August 27,2014 A. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-1 (Howdyshell abstain)to adopt the minutes as presented for August 13, 2014. B. And C. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carried 5-0 to adopt the minutes as presented for August 27, 2014. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per Individual for each proleat. Please sign In after speaking. D. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19550 — RANCHO HAVEN, LP — A request to subdivide a parcel of about 87,120 square feet(2.0 acres),that is currently developed with two (2) commercial buildings, into two(2)parcels of 54,014 square feet(1.24 acres)and C, D, E82 • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION HO MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 3 33,106 square feet (0.76 acres) in the Industrial Park (IP) District and Haven Avenue Overlay District(HADD),located at the northwest comer of Haven Avenue and Sixth Street Related files:Conditional Use Permit CUP 99-53,Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-01193, and Minor Development Review DRC2010-00400. This action is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315—Minor Land Divisions;APN:0209-262-20. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 27,2014. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE TO AN UNSPECIFIED DATE. Chairman Wimberly noted the item was carried over from, the August 27, 2414 meeting date. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Howdyshell to continue the item to an unspecified date at the applicants request. Carried 5-0. • E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450 — SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION-A request to subdivide a 13.23-acre parcel to create 3 new parcels within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast comer of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street - APN: 0209-211-24. Related files: Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250.Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00565 — SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION -A request to develop a 6-building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land within the General Industrial(GI)District, located at the northeast comer of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street- APN: 0209-211-24. Related files:Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. G. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2014-00250-SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION- A request to establish a Uniform Sign Program in connection with the proposed development of a 6-building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land within the General Industrial (GI)District, located at the northeast comer of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street - APN: 0209-211-24. Related files: Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450. Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner,presented the report and PowerPoint presentation(copy on file). In response to Commissioner Howdyshell he pointed out where the possible rail • spur could be placed in the future and noted that they would lose some parking but that the site has an overage of parking provided. C, D, E83 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION C MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2094 Page 4 Carl Vanderhoek, representing Scheu Management Corp said staff did a great job and had no additional comment. Chairman Wimberly opened the public hearing and hearing and seeing none, closed the public hearing. Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Fletcher to Approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450, Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014- 00250 as presented. Carried 5-0. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 -COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,LP FOR CSF,INC.-A request to change the land use designation from Industrial Park(IP)to General Industrial(GI)in order to construe a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6 acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District-APNs: 0229401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related Cases: Development Review DRC2014-0000127 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE.CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC.-A request to modify the Zoning Map to change land use designation from Industrial Park(IP)to General Industrial (GI)in order to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6 acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park (1P) Development District = APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related Cases:Development Review DRC2014-0000127 and General Plan Amendment DRC2014- 00012.Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - Site plan and architectural review of a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6 acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Paris (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related Cases:General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014- 00126.Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, gave the report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted the buildings to the east and west are at least double the size of C, D, E84 • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION c MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 5 this developer's request. He said staff received a letter from Fish and Wildlife with concerns regarding the Delhi Sand Flower Loving Fly and the related biological study for the project. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said provided the Commission agrees, a condition will be added to the mitigation measures of all three resolutions and will become part of the MMP. Jeff Bloom, DCM Economic and Community Development said Fish and Wildlife presented two possible remedies: either a back to back seasonal study or get an assessment from a biologist certified to perform Delhi Fly studies. Mr. Bloom said we recommend the applicant consult with US Fish and Wildlife and confirm this is taken care of suitably. He said adding the condition allows the project to move forward past the Planning Commission level and allows therm time to address this fully before it reaches the City Council. • Jim Robertson, Commerce Construction said they understand the condition and their biologist is investigating the situation. Chairman Wimberly emphasized the Commission recommendation and for it to be handled prior to the City Council hearing. He then opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. Vice Chairman Oaxaca said the project was well thought out and a reasonable solution has been proposed for the concern from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Commissioner Howdysheil said it is the highest and best use for the land and liked the renderings. Commissioner Munoz agreed and added that it is well designed and fits in with the surrounding development. Commissioner Fletcher said the applicant provided more than what we asked for, it provides a good transition that makes sense, it provides jobs, commerce and revenue. Chairman Wimberly felt all the main points had been covered; the developer has stepped up. Mr. Flower read the added condition into the record: Prior to approval of a rough grading plan the applicant shall perform a DSF(Delhi • sands flower-loving fly) survey to determine whether the project may affect the DSF and the results shall be provided to the Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office for review. All mitigation measures recommended by the biologist and/or C, D, E85 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION o� MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2094 Page 6 Department of Fish and Wildlife Service shall be fulfilled prior to permit issuance. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Munoz to Approve Design Review DRC2014-00127 and recommend approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 and General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. All three resolutions were amended with the added condition regarding the biological study for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly. Carried 5-0. K. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2014-00774-SSRB GROUP,INC.-A request to modify an approved-Conditional Use Permit(DRC2012-00057)to increase the hours of operation in order to open earlier for an existing restaurant and bar(Sixty6 Sports Lounge)located at the southeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue within the Specialty Commercial(SC)Development District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, Suite K1. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted that he prepared the staff report and it has been signed and submitted by Jeff Bloom, DCM Economic&Community Development. Mr. Van der Zwaag called Deputy Kovensky to explain the memo they prepared regarding the establishment. Deputy Kovensky, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, said she and her partner are part of the ACT(Alcohol Compliance Team) and noted their inspections occurred June 1, 2013 to the present day. She said she is providing updated information (copy on file) referencing many violations and calls for service to the location including a murder in the parking lot, bugs in the alcohol, noise. outside speakers, flashing lights, open doors, refusal to post ABC & Business licenses, not enough security guards on site, not using an ID scanner, holding a car show and serving alcohol without a Temporary Use Permit, and opening early without a permit during World Cup Soccer. She noted that there was an incident involving a murder and although the murder suspect was kicked out of the establishment, the Police were not called and then the murder occurred after that. She said there is an outstanding fee of$575 to the City for false alarm calls as well as an outstanding admission tax payment. She said all of these items were noted because the deputies are required to do so. Commissioner Munoz asked what type of response/tenor the deputies receive when they ask for compliance. He asked about the bugs in the alcohol. He asked if the business owner is aware of the outstanding fees. He asked how the Police determine if a call for service specifically relates to this business. C, D, E86 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION HO 0A MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 7 Deputy Kovensky said they asked three times for the ABC and Business License postings. She said they observe and document what they see. She said the fee issue was reported to her by Business Licenses and to her knowledge, the applicant is aware. She said the owners know what they should be doing as it is in their permits. She said fruit flies can get in the alcohol, ABC knows that, it is a common occurrence, but the counts for this business are above acceptable levels. She said the bartender should be diligently checking for them every day-and they can be stopped with screw type tops or covers over the tops. She said the City charges a fee for false alarms which has not been paid. She said their call logs note the specific location. She said there is a variety of calls that pull our deputies away from other things in the city. • Commissioner Howdyshell asked how many of these calls occur prior to the noon hour. Deputy Kovensky said she did not have those statistics but said probably not many;most would be after the noon hour. Commissioner Fletcher asked what is causing the false alarms and Sixty6 and the Koffee Klatch. Deputy Kovensky said she could not specify that; there could be a number of causes. She said drunks shaking doors, spiders in the motion sensors, etc. are possibilities. The Koffee Klatch had none before Sixty6 Sports Lounge opened. Chairman Wimberly invited the applicant to speak. Bobi Bedi, SSRB group said the building was empty for 7 years; the wind can cause the alarm to sound and they have done what they can. Because it is a historical building they cannot replace the doors. He said the murder did not occur in their lot, it was across from the Flame Broiler;the person was drunk and in his business for only 15 minutes and he got kicked out-he said the reason there was an arrest was because of their parking lot cameras. He said the second fight occurred after the car show. He said Koffee Klatch has a band louder than their speakers which are only 60 watts. He said he would buy dinner and drink for anyone to come and hear that it is not his speakers that are causing the noise. He said changing the doors would keep the flies out, but they can't change them or install airflow units over the doors either because they cannot attach anything to the building. He said they never have Flies at their other locations. He said they have greatly reduced the number of fly bottle counts down to 6. He said they can only have one small sign. He said they • cannot put anything on the walls. He said they are penalized because the building is historic. He said they keep the doors open because they do not want it to be like a nightclub;they want it to be more like a lounge. He said they have made mistakes because C, D, E87 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION C=40A MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 8 they have never had a business like this, but suggested that rather than slap their hands, help them out. He said nothing in their permits say the doors have to be closed. He said their permit says they need one guard for every 75 people. He said with the boxing matches they always have 3 or 4 security guards. He said with respect to the report of flashing lights; the lights do not flash, they change colors very slowly, it is almost unnoticeable. He said Koffee Klatch has doubled their business because of them. He said seven new tenants have come into the center since they opened. He said they will make changes that will work. He said he did not sponsor the car show and he did not provide alcohol in the lot. He said when they discovered it, they called. He said they did make the mistake of opening early for the World Cup. He said if they only have 6 DUI's then they are doing something right-he said their bartenders are really well trained. He said their plan does not state that they have to call the Police if they have someone that is intoxicated. We do not serve them anymore and walk them out He said it is not mentioned when you do something right. He said with respect to the owed fees that he would pay them tomorrow. Sunil Sethi said the deputy has been there three times. He asked if she has seen any improvement with the flies and if they are going in the right direction. Chairman Wimberly said there could not be a dialogue between him and the deputy at this time. He said their question can be referenced to the staff and to work with them. Commissioner Munoz asked the purpose of the outside speakers and if other businesses have complained. Mr. Bedi stated they are only for,games, they are not connected to their live music system. He said the other businesses have not complained even once. They(Wine Tailor 8 Koffee Klatch) both have live bands outside and they understand. Chairman Wimberly asked Mr. Bedi if he is onsite. Mr. Bedi said he and the partners are onsite all the time at all of their locations. Commissioner Fletcher asked the deputy if she has observed any progress. Deputy Kovensky said not all on the list are violations, some are just statistics. She said there has been improvement in the number of bugs in the alcohol. Commissioner Munoz asked Mr. Bedi if he is aware that a permit is needed for special events. He asked, "If you knew that, why did you open anyway?" C, D, E88 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION C=lm MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 9 Mr. Bedi said the only time they did that was for the World Cup. They had many requests to open, so they did, it was the only time. Commissioner Fletcher said he is on,notice and he is assuming(Mr. Bedi)knows the items to be corrected and that he (Mr. Bedi) had no objection to working on them. Mr. Bedi said he will make sure those are handled. Commissioner Fletcher said the Police only come if someone complains. He said you have to take that into account. He said at night, at the location of this business; sound travels. He said complaints have been received from the Red Hill area at night regarding truck noise. • Vice Chairman Oaxaca said he has visited the site several times and similar establishments and none are open before 91:00 am. He asked what they will be doing at 9:00 am and if they would be serving alcohol at 9:00 am. Mr. Bedi said the only reason is that Sunday games start at 10:00 am on Sundays and they are packed by 9:45 am. He said they want to be sure they can serve them-breakfast, Blood Mary's, Mimosas etc.; we want to be sure we are ready and that they do not want to violate their opening time. He said they would only be open on special sport event Sundays not even on Saturdays. Commissioner Howdyshell said she understands the importance of a missed kickoff time. She said most violations likely occur after the noon hour. She said this establishment has designed a business so people have a place to go if they want to watch the game. She said a historical building does have limitations and restrictions and we should see what can be done to assist the business. She said the business owners want to comply and we would like to see them succeed. She said she also wants to move forward with staffs recommendation for a 6-month review. Vice Chairman Oaxaca said the applicant has disputed/disagreed some aspects of the deputy's report. He said many should be easy to clarify such as what is to be posted, doors open/closed, we want clear agreement. He did not see how they could move forward if there is anything the applicant disagrees with is in the permit language. He said he is concerned about what is in the report and what they disagree with. He said he takes the deputies report at face value. You need to read and understand what you agreed to. Mr. Bedi said he did not see anything in, the report he disagrees with but the number of flies • in the alcohol has dropped, the number of false alarms is down. He said they had noise complaints in the first 3 months but none since then. He said with respect to the doors open/closed, it just seems to be communication - if the City says they have to stay closed C, D, E89 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AHO MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 10 then, they will keep them closed. He said this is the first he has heard of this. Commissioner Fletcher asked about the report of stolen TVs. Mr. Bedi said prior to their opening they hired a plumbing contractor that they caught stealing TVs and that was one of the calls. He said they are not worried about the number of calls. He said they want to make sure they do not have another incident like the murder; they cannot call every time someone is asked to leave the bar. Commissioner Munoz said we are here to help: He suggested they read their agreement and understand it. He said they knew going in it was a historic building and that would limit what they could do. He said they can't get upset about that as they knew the rules. He said there is no joy in seeing the building empty. He said it is not the City telling you can't do something for some other reason. Commissioner Munoz said the City wants them to be successful. He said he did not have a problem with the two hours, but he does have a problem with violating the permits. Mr. Bedi said it is frustrating to see other buildings-they have better signage. He said,you will never see us violate the CUP ever again. "if you walkout there and tell us our speakers are loud, we will take them out." Chairman Wimberly opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing none, closed the public hearing. He then commented and said the City approved their permits and they agreed to all the requirements. He said the request for more hours is admirable but there is a compliance issue with the rules of the existing permits. He said he did not see for public safety an extension of time if they are not incompliance. He said the recommendation from staff is to give them the hours and then bring them back in 6 months. He said he is not supportive of this request. He said when we see they can be in compliance with all the rules and regulations then we can entertain the request for additional hours. Commissioner Fletcher said the applicant would like to comply and are willing to comply. He said he did not see a big issue with their request for two hours and how that triggered a report from the Police and ACT. The ACT reported on what has gone on here. He said he understands false alarms and they need to do what they need to do to reduce that. He said the murder was probably people at the wrong location at the wrong time. He said 3 fights is not a lot but security needs to escort them out and if you don't think you can control it then call the cops. He said people may drink too much and get out of hand at a bar. He said 'calls for service'is a double edged sword-you are supposed to call to diffuse the situation but it also adds to the tally. With respect to noise issues-make sure they don't exceed the approved levels and be aware people may complain. He said uncapped bottles get flies- cap them and check them. C; D, E90 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page I I Commissioner Munoz said it is no different from other restaurant/bars in the City-we ask them all to comply-some have and some haven't. He said the Commission will visit this again in 6 months. He said this can be fixed and their attitude about this-He said this is pari of doing business. He said you have a better opportunity to make money above that of most people. He said he has no problem with giving the 2 extra hours-you made a commitment-and we are ready to try to help. If you get the idea to open/close at the spur of the moment-don't do it. He said the recommendation is to allow the earlier 2 hours in the morning and then we come back for a review. He said this gives ample time to address this and if they have problems, work with the staff. He said we have a great staff and excellent police; they've worked with us before. He said they just report the facts. He said he believes the business owners can do a good job there and he has faith in them. He said he should read his permit thoroughly and get his staff to follow it. • Commissioner Howdyshell said she applauds the owners and believe the corrections will be done. She said she supports the staff recommendation as itis important for the business and the City. She said the 6-month review is just a minor thing to do to look at where we stand today from 6 months from now. Vice Chairman Oaxaca said it was disconcerting to read the deputy's report. He said he is glad staff recommended we revisit this in 6 months. He echoed Commissioner Munoz' comment that it is all black and white regarding the fact that their permits are their guiding lights. He said the applicant has proven they can operate various businesses in the City. He said this is a new business concept for them; and even after a year or two there are rough patches and changes that occur. He said he supports the request but noticed the competitors do not open this early and perhaps this maybe anew opportunity. He said he would like to see them re-visit in 6 months for the improvements. He said be clear about posting their signage, security levels and continue good decisions demonstrated at the other businesses. He thanked them for being here. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher to approve the CUP Modification request as presented with staffs recommendation for a 6-month review. Carried 5-0. V.I. COMMISSION BUSINEWHISTORIC PRESERVATION AND. PLANNING COMMISSION~ Chairman Wimberly offered a ,hearty "welcome bark!" was offered to Commissioner Fletcher. Commissioner Munoz offered congratulations to the new Chairman, Ray Wimberly and Vice Chairman Francisco Oaxaca. C, D, E91 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 12 Commissioner Munoz commented on how difficult it is for our deputies and noted his trust in their reports and commended them on their work. Commissioner Howdyshell also commended the deputies and said the work they do is a reflection of our City standards. She said our City is seen as a safe city and that we and our Police take that seriously. - - 7. EN - - - ;. . . . A! VRNK ST THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL IMMEDIATELYADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP TO DiSCUS PRE- APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00613—ALTA RANCHO. THE WORKSHOP WiLL BE HELD IN THE RAINS ROOM. Jeff Bloom, DCM Economic and Community Development noted that the applicant withdrew his application and therefore the workshop would not be held. The Commission adjourned at 8:30 PM 1,Lois J.Schrader,Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee,hereby certify that a true,accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 18,2014,at least 72 hours prior to the meettng per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Chic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accomrtwdatlons to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notlitcation of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing Impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. if appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping,booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. C, D, E92 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION CR= MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 13 It Is Important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an Item not on the agenda,you may do so under"Public Comments." There Is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on fie in the offices of the Planning • Department, City Wall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public Inspections during regular business hours,Monday through Thursday,7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m.,except for legal City holidays. APPEA Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision m a decision to the City Council within 10 calendar da may PPS the Commission's and must be accompanied �' �appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office p by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please tum off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting Is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us C, D, E93 ® STAFF REPORT _, 1 ,� Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 �\ J Date: May 27, 2015 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C,UCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner Subject: TIME EXTENSION DRC2015-00244 —611 & Hermosa JP/DF, LLC (Formerly known as Phelan Development Company) - A request to extend the duration of an existing entitlement approval by an additional one (1) year for an industrial warehouse/office project comprised of two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 100,000 square feet on a parcel of about 212,000 square feet (4.87 acres) within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at 9212 Hermosa Avenue - APN: 0209-211-41. Related files: Development Review DRC2007-00696, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18872 and Time Extension DRC2013-00326. On May 14, 2008, the Planning Commission determined that the project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions and • Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects. Per Section 15162, no further environmental review is required as there are no chan es to the project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Time Extension DRC2015-00244 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. ANALYSIS: A. General: In March of 2015, the applicant, 61 & Hermosa JP/DF, LLC, submitted a request to extend the duration of the entitlement approval (hereafter referred to as a "time extension") for Development Review DRC2007-00696. The applicant does not propose any changes to the project (Exhibit A). The project was originally reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on May 14, 2008 (Exhibits B and C). Per Resolution of Approval No. 08-19, Standard Condition B.1, the approval of the project was set to expire "if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within five (5) years from the date of approval." With the exception of tentative tract/parcel maps, a time extension for any development review entitlement was not allowed. Thus, the approval of this project was set to expire on May 14, 2013. In September of 2012, the City officially adopted an updated Development Code. Included in the update was a new Code section that allows for applicants to request time extensions for all entitlements. Per Section 17.14.090(C), an initial time extension request may be granted that extends the expiration date for two (2) years from the original expiration date. Near the end of that two-year period, a second, and final, time extension request may be granted that extends the expiration date for one (1) additional year beyond the expiration date granted by the first time extension. Both time extension requests are subject to the review and approval by the same authority that approved the original project. In April of 2013, the applicant submitted a request to extend the duration of the entitlement approval for DRC2007-00696. This two (2) year extension (DRC2013-00326) was approved and the entitlement was set to expire on May 14, 2015. The applicant is now proposing Item F1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2015-00244— PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY May 27, 2015 Page 2 an additional and final extension of one (1) year. If the applicant's request is granted, the approval of the project will expire on May 14, 2016. B. Background for Time Extension Request: The applicant stated that. market conditions in recent years have prevented them from securing a tenant for the entitled project. The applicant also stated that they are in negotiations with a potential interested party and although they have no signed agreement at this time, they anticipate a decision at the end of June, 2015. C. Grading, Technical, and Design Review Committees: On April 1, 2008, all of the review Committees analyzed the original project and recommended approval to the Planning Commission. Their conditions were subsequently incorporated into the Resolution of Approval (Resolution No. 08-19)for the project. As the applicant does not propose any changes to the project in conjunction with this time extension request, no further action by any of the Committees is necessary. The Committees' original conditions of approval continue to apply, and this is noted in,the attached Resolution of Approval. D. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18872: The associated tentative parcel map is not included in this time extension request. Although the approval of the tentative parcel map was set to expire on May 14, 2011, three (3) years after the date of the original approval, a time extension for the tentative parcel map is not necessary at this time. The State legislature passed three bills, AB333, A13208, and AB116 in July 2009, July 2011, and July 2013 respectively. These bills automatically extended the duration of the approval period for all tentative maps that were set to expire on or before January 1, 2012, (AB333), on or before January 1, 2014, (AB208) and on or before January 1, 2016 (AB116). AB333 granted the tentative parcel map a two-year extension, AB208 granted the tentative parcel map a two-year extension and AB116 granted the tentative parcel map another two-year extension. The duration of the combined time extensions granted by all three bills is six (6) years. Therefore, the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18872 is now set to expire on May 14, 2017. E. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission determined that the original project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions and Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects in connection with the City's approval of Development Review DRC2007-00696 in May of 2008. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No changes are proposed to the project; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; and no new important information shows that the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered. There are no changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated when concluding the project was categorically exempt. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not analyzed in the previous environmental review, and will not have more severe effects than previously analyzed. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received. Item F2 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2015-00244— PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY May 27, 2015 Page 3 Respectfully submitted, Candyce urnett Planning Director CB:MS:NC/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Time Extension Request Letter(prepared by the applicant) Exhibit B - Staff Report May 14, 2008, for Development Review DRC2007-00696 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT18872 (with exhibits) Exhibit C - Staff Report June 26, 2013 for Time Extension DRC2013-00326 (no exhibits) Exhibit D - Resolution of Approval No. 08-19 for Development Review DRC2007-00696 Exhibit E - Resolution of Approval No. 13-25 for Time Extension DRC2013-00326 Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2015-00244 • • Item F3 PHELAN Phelan Development Company � a D E V E L O P M E `! T J JJ February 17, 2015 Mr. Michael Smith City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Request for extension of time for Development_DRC 2007-00696 6th & Hermosa JP/DF, LLC Dear Mr. Smith: The purpose of this letter is to request an extension of time for the development project located at 6'& Hermosa, referenced above. There are no proposed changes to the previously approved project. Enclosed is the Uniform Application and check in the amount of$692.00 for the fees to cover this submittal. Thank you for your assistance in this matter and please contact me if you need further information. Sincer Jeff lig an Manag CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA enclosures MAR 0 5 2015 RECEIVED - PLANNING EXHIBIT A Item F4 • T H E C I T Y O F PANCHO CUCA N 0 K C A Std Report DATE: May 14, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18872 - 6TH & HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC - A proposal to subdivide a property of 4.87 acres in conjunction with a request to construct two industrial warehouse/office buildings with a combined floor area of about 100,000 square feet in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 5, located at 9212 Hermosa Avenue; APN: 0209-211-41. Related file: Development Review DRC2007-00696. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is • categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies for exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315, Class 15, Minor Land Divisions, and Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00696 - 6TH & HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC -A request to construct two industrial warehouse/office buildings with a combined floor area of about 100,000 square feet on a parcel of about 4.87 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 5, located at 9212 Hermosa Avenue; APN: 0209-211-41. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18872. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies for exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315, Class 15, Minor Land Divisions, and Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Surrounding Land Use and Zonina: North - Office/Warehouse Building -General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 5 South - OfficelWarehouse Building -General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 5 East - Office buildings-General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 5 West - Office - General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 5 • EXHIBIT B Item F5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM18872 AND DRC2007-00696 —6TH & HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC May 14, 2008 Page 2 S. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a rectangular parcel of about 627 feet (north-south) by 338 feet (east-west). The site is vacant and is dominated by short grasses, shrubs, and a grouping of trees. The property is bound on the east by Hermosa Avenue and on the south by 6th Street. To the north is a large warehouse distribution building of about 400,000 square feet and to the west is an office complex consisting of four 20,000 square foot buildings. Across the streets to the south and east, respectively, is a large warehouse distribution building of about 400,000 square feet and an office/warehouse complex consisting of six buildings of various sizes. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is General.Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 5. The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1,078 feet and 1,069 feet, respectively. D. Parking Calculations: Number of Type Floor Area Parking Spaces of Use (Square Feet) Ratio Required Building A (overall) 44,410 Warehousing 38,410 Floor area up to 20,000 square feet 20,000 1/1,000 20 Floor area 20,001 —40,000 square feet 20,000 1/2,000 10 Floor area 40,001 square feet or more 410 1/4,000 1 Office 4,000 1/250 16 Total Required/Total Provided 47/50 Building B (overall) 65,106 Warehousing 59,606 Floor area up to 20,000 square feet 20,000 1/1,000 20 Floor area 20,001 —40,000 square feet 20,000 1/2,000 10 Floor area 40,001 square feet or more 19,606 1/4,000 5 Office 5,500 1/250 22 Total Required/Total Provided 57/61 Total Required/Total Provided Overall 104/111 I Item F6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM18872 AND DRC2007-00696— 6TH 8 HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC • May 14, 2008 Page 3 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject property into two parcels of 2 acres and 2.77 acres (Parcels 1 and 2, respectively) and then to construct two buildings totaling 44,410 square feet on Parcel 1 (Building A) and 60,606 square feet on Parcel 2 (Building B . The buildings are speculative at this time, but as typical for these ) included. The office area will be located along the southeast comer of each building. The do types of buildings, small offices are ck loading/storage area for each building will be located in a common area between the buildings. There will be two points of access — one via Hermosa Avenue and another via 6th Street. Th will be an additional access point from Hermosa Avenue for emergency gs loading/storage area will be via the driveway at Hermosa Avenue, Building A and BuildingB ere have 50 and 61 spaces, respectively, for a combined 111 g y purposes. Access to the customers. This quantity exceeds the minimum parking requirement for the site parking stalls for employees and will (Exh Landscape coverage is 14.9 percent; the minimum requirement is 7 percent for this development nt district (Exhibit 1). op B. Tentative Parcel MaD SUBTPM18872: In conjunction with this application, theapplicant to subdivide the property into two parcels (Exhibit E). Each building will be constructed on it parcel. The proposed map complies with the City's design and development standards. proposes s own C. Gradin and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee A James) reviewed the application on April 1, 2008. The Committee accepted theapplication • recommended a (Addington and approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution oApproval. g D. Design Review Committee: The Committee Stewart, Munoz, and Nicholsonon April 1, 2008 (Exhibit J). The Committee was generally satisfied wi)thethe su the project recommended approval of the project subject to the applicant revising the site desittal and architecture of each building. Their revisions include incorporating a "reverse" chamfer along the top of the majority of the parapet of each building, adding the "checkerboard" 9n and reveals/score lines to all publicly visible tower insets, and adding more glazing ed cornice elevations facing the streets. They have also provided decorative pavingd patterned driveway. The Committee's conditionsnto g 9 on the building Approval. have been incorporated into attached Resolution teof E. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Qualit Act the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 ex that the project d Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions as the project Proposes y (CEQA) and parcel into two parcels, and Section 15332 In-Fill Development exemption under State CEQA surrounded on all sides by existing industrial development. P the subdivision site one P ent Projects as the project site is RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel M Development Review DRC2007-00696 through the adoption of the with conditions. aP SUBTPM188p and attached Resolutions of Approval Res ectfully submitted, R- �1a s R. Troyer, AICP ' fanning Director ' f� Item F7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM18872 AND DRC2007-00696—6TH & HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC May 14, 2008 Page 4 JRT:MS1ma Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Map Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Tentative Parcel Map 18872 Exhibit F - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit G - Floor Plans Exhibit H - Elevations and Building Sections Exhibit I - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit J - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated April 1, 2008 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2007-00696 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18872 Item F8 _MSY••YL .. .__ _ _ L LIumi 1 J � d� .�• d d� -t -� i� 'J7 _ •1 1 f Y 7299,f_j-'-� Ic y__ `• _ ,+•_ �. {� 998 1 - ' r f - 9299 99991. �a. Y j._p8� �. � - ; iSLNWY_L a �•_ 3� ( �Q��ja ._� � �, —,, -,� 1(,.•. i-., . MENYOS.t qY r^.��r, �3LL'Yaa ..: • � � , .. ��� ..i� + - �b - -_ --•_•-b•_ _Y- -'- __-_ �. Wr. , 3� C. Y» Yr d C :.T:-0 .�rtY>•t Irrm..i'��TTT''''---"' . - .L".:-�.}�'±t:,i.T,• ��. L '9 ] h.-OYYIYInL• �. LI �fil L!E{�r��� m ({n -�Z.Y"�-L'_• r ��.J �I•_Gi G� ° L }I' » i a Your GGG 1 T• Y •�^ � { +..�_� �� .... fI ¢I faiYe . .. . °--e4'x�LL�, tYxYYL. L �eYri6A.4w ° • � -+,xr».� � �..- '"Ytr .. ;ti it -F, 89�� a �Y � ..,Y�`[L '• y'd`1�`'Y"� �wY.S Y 2 f - �" �9$F c�ti {F@a r I, L._ _ d 'y��•^' ,. "3 ° f,». W :Yr. II :. I 43[�yy7€#ggE" pps� it •xcflauo�q .� '��' ', �1 [R ° w_. S -YF.YYviu S 1 G J••_ L° ~E 1 //� .�.i1.__.- �_._._ Cf', •Yfi x,YTt p' 0 µ�` u,rY.f+.�u_ E w 4= '�r--� al E Y 1 1 »»c s 1 �i E�.li �-,`�'�-s'f -. f� yy ( �-.xYwucu.JE�g Beryl 'Iw''•' •�• j. . � I '-`�c1»Y.YwnI .._ �. r °I��C� 3 _v� ���. - I��JI � a '" tl � • �eg- �� ..� INEIW/N AV m i � r � d � �-Y;:��1� �Ix LI Y_ _ _ r ' • � . � o. d �,r81 �1ti �'�n '`4`__ -_69b4 •�' I _.�.. � e�_ � � + j�y1J1 rrc.n-� � l2�i�,) W I � • )fall"'' 'y L.' �5 • L^ + 7 $1�N y ( t 1 w`1i a -A� 1?• . + � ` Fj�•t l j ' ..�' Ji � y��< ' .t yS ap. 14 r �'1 I r �J� 1 'f 1'• - 1 r[ f r �n 4iM a - II Y .��R1� - r y •� ,,wr-�� t1 - r a X U = w S4E1�•V 1 P:OfNFINL MWSaM.I SINE T .C.. WW1 � f I 1 �e •'�} 1 NCIRCIE '+ al:P3.But xn/Sam.a �'- is �• fy.,.�� Vt s — nar .o en-m rc eve-e»-m -on w x - s n E xTee NP. ce _ee Y Me e5/!a Y ALITA.V.E•OIAaIO..[ 3 rP+Er CITY Of RANCHO ...een Aa Qcl I a ��" E"• CUCAMONGA --�9�eB IRa PH ELAN DEVELOPMENT •?"? DRC#2001-00698 AE �'tiln�l�°°n SITE UTLMZATION MAP BUSTPM918S72 p�-ate STH STREET R HERMOSA AVENUE awl C� lc X wD"l-M 70 Y KW,, I -ttttf ll GRO55 LOT AREA: 211.209,f 4.04 acro / NET LOT AREA: I illi I � I I i I I --- 208.084 4.77 oc97. , _I—. ^^•� I ( TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT- 105.016 31 t I dnlor.E: Ci.6C6Y TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 109,516 d 1 tl ( i w,9axw a I I I I u�ioY 511-tdnwlc o: •-•�- 1 COVERAGE(on GRD•.f„z): 49.72% III I PROSED 41!,4!0 sff i I 51TE COVERAGE(on NET a o); 50.47% II �t WAREIISE/DI TRIBLmO I ��_—p I FAR(on GRO55 aro): 51.85% I FAR(nn NET arca): LANDSCAPE COVERAGE REWIRED: 7D % LAND5CAPE COVERAGE(on NET area;: 14.54% I .�Klaa�art d,. 9i.C9„1 r I PARKING REQUIRED-BUILDING A 47,pace] ii C,nU N.WJ,Ix a.i.CW a'1 _ _____ � ` •�i,•�r� wufMU9C 1i0.CMYa.I��.� Kea - _.....- . . I—__� e I II I I I I I ;\\ 1 PARKING REQUIRED_ ”•'rte . � 1 BIJILDINf,B 57 sparr3 I I I !I ( oma n000YK4l.aoo,n 1z,rvw,r, rD ,OZNMa R.SrLY,I a'I CLO y, IOyKA I waafrvLV%IM.0.'Vb Mt I.i 4U 41 10,aKaa ! Wr.RYOVJL I"].RK YM1I:a,�9„) ]N,ra PARKING PRONDED-BUILDING A: c0 spm — — — — t f— _,-- PROP ED 62,6 sf p; VIDEO-BUILDING B. ± PARKING PRO 61 ,party « �5 1 ],audM. 39 aPKee I I 1 AREHOUsE/DISTRIBLMON i I _ C , . BILDINGB TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 1119p3ce] r • I � J ---------------- ----- — -------- ------------ — — 6th and Hermosa I ® s Rancho Cucamonga, CA 's_ A-2 ®PHELAN a F �rn 1 2 C. TENTATIVE PARCEL rn " MAP No. 18872 ,I j ' _. i _� �-. }.i: _ __ pp i•� II II ' io�iw.`n o s.'�.•Iln�xRY.n s•'.rt v cm.�•^•"'Im v sna — �'•' ) - -� �� -_ 'N ' _�Y 11' ESE I I; A�GPSPARCEL9MAIBFR'mw_a�_x _—I _ C• oxnu w4W -�_-yxxyx's`�S_ - - ._ — �.HERM�BAVENU2_•�— _ � �TI ' MS]wawxa .x.Rx.c^x9.e-W.- IEU —x`ff 1 }Lal___, - - —•— — Arstcwic nn.x aenanx m.,a T" __ �•a. '—esr.�ta '— -- �'J - T xf.rwr ecncn a]regio 1 IIIII� 1 •! + I ` I t 1• IRS I A m '�f��.l n��'� '1 ,• j r� .�.Rxa.,ImeR.ncl x.nnu xa]s� CEL MAP NO. 4130 W ,' li �$�ii pwces l qI 1 _ 1 f II I. ns,we e.ra.nrsm.� swan.u. IIY37y A: ]u.nwo 2. 1 � I 1 �f•! 1 r I PARCEL A PiRCEti [ I, �•� �n]vusvHnw .arsmµr... �(r• tl w�aiR m.w wrur �-I I I e ,•I � -. - 1 111 3', 1 ! m Il b E�� :� I q��.9xsmc w enxwo nF.umc..r.n S] et.l xe.rxMxr[axN elx 9@[R R.nfMewe n.(MIL x nxc4lL I I�� � I 1 {{{+g 45nlMt MI R.Rx PPRM.M xCtiNnl xMlpii xECV Wm i I I I ! I II I'1 w+®`a9u'�e.a m'ws um°�Rn cowl a amwisn rm eaal9- .11 1 IIf jl �.mcwnwa�oNrtxxrn.a.or..nm x.. wI n eia9sn.Ac n n.lxrx.n er xos.a. �)' I � I I II 1 � enlYrxl Iol Y1N.] re MO[u .nxR;n r 1.M f rl I - 11 � •I �I� xi9xxxx p�!1 3m� [MRv u..r; f 9[ x Slxuo-.rq el.m xq NI 5c 1 e4 u. ' � a I e S 'a' 7 1 - s E IA ¢�?o.m>7 �, y s' �l i 1 1 O I +aF Iom"rao<•rsxcmo nrt.xmwn ae srr¢r wem...xo ..7 RCL _.-. 11 1�•T i i �O : _ _ -_ A. I 1 ��I I e�asrORiwz'°aat a mnrters:.,rtx�`raru'"`c;arwar•••ceu ti f ( r eer'-- ,.� "'x"n u.9 rtooix.x nlKa uaMxr noross r.ecne r,w z"10h 1., �e1O1]e'� r.'..''e ^m'4'"'x,l,•^• CITY OF RANCHO As9est__ e1 e_�.9lnaers is mw CUCAMON .� vll ran> mlm• PHELAN DEVELOPMENT a— xrr 5 7 azi^te00 „a;,�^'•m.a GA R nel v_ a .u e�n. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.18872 ra•x.c. --- mu. DRU ;:-00888 3U97PM/]3BT2 8TH STREET 8 OSAO: ORnT0.4R. Re..w ty a_yy CS Zsm TIM _ 14 { pp 1 q I PfF 'I' —��•- ,— _ _ __atm_ -:.:� I I {I ppp �. I I I I I I p L L ! _ �- I t I Sli T 1 SEPI FOR BiCT1�J I ISCTI C9�IIIZ Pim aS� / 1. '• p^%2 A _ �•f It l I 1 1I -- mx i � �• crlueee our.,r, '�__ cln ofRANCHO ,n CUCAMONGA ppE 9tr'e_`i'1_s DRCR 3097-00696 1 ! �°" " ^�Im'n rl<w PHELAN DEVELOPMENT _ ------ - -•^+ - "'""' SUSTPMRieel2 gyp" CONCEPTUAL GRADING PIAN STREET 6 HERMOSH AVENUE �m , ERq� m zx - -� o0 c� j ► i i -- Icnowseo auink+C� uMO5F�2,00p SF MFZL, I I I I r l� r 6th and Hermosa LJ Rancho Cucamonga, CA A,$ e�4N G�r��ndlM1 yrcMlw.y be ®PHELAN o i Ym• .' ar Y m II, •IIeti>I. y C LS_ __ ��~ dnr/ w afial SECnONA.ACD I I !LLII/ I SECTION BE —tel S3�— JI w 9ECM1:SCC CITY OF RANCHO Axodeletl Engl I arta ns _ src, 4 n 1 CUCAMONGA PHELAN DEVELOPMENT s xn-xeoo ORO/280?- yB A6 CROSS SECnONS _ SUSTPMAIS872 STH STREET 8 HERMOSA AVENUE w.Cq WA Rl �n1Y/I-0nhvJJ.l'�^Yffi/.eRibf/iiciur F4®.xr,.r In.rIP�WYx/lrm,�/59fY//93An�/�,GA,➢,Rr�i0arf2N4AN99YN£.CMFFIq OnIlM lookIyoiA9r'vpZei'lAcmnAi/fuS4PNni.�9•YrYry o.Isiv FI9Y.r �,:FB � .. vonm., wroasx b �•�'\ -- — � � I G l i PA I 1lpirsw,. 9r �� ILIk�L9'IR^"� ABP4wa 114;23 r lnsuonwmrxuszuriMs +se•ilIM•°RIF,tmazrranmr/rnmewra Ym�rwrSO"'YAObmrf 'HIML[F��unl IA1. ��. .�.,,gRvsirm��uwwmaaoin6.<riire°a� II nmzz+mV •r �s�rosuw.syra-.awYsnxwii.• n ��rteeagff ■ o aas+v .wnwncf!dA�4Y//YAJFld/.w.+�n^YJ/Y./.f>J.�•J/l/,@GY.o»i.Yhit FF.�_ FP 's'lS�gl t � t�� rf'YrAiw�mimu�/w9n.v�svnrav�'.CY 3CL1�.R' C7 �i� __. Fri n6a-, 194. F �-'n��� +Nu/ravivr„snev LC. xeyi�iev�r:rN/,n//mwNiiu//i .:..� :5Flvrniix��asiov�,mriris�11 Lllmvmr�ml.�aar/�9 `.n:■ � 3AXp.OJlfi�...a.virn�3 ,;Fp,� o PROPOSED 42,410 st WAREHOUSE I DISTRIBUTION ... it BUILDINGA -�I., 5, r 7m E 11j "L t1: L iGiIf L! rD 3 PROPOSED 62.606,r 00 WAREHOUSE/DISTRIBUTION BUILDINGS FW F iL 8TH �P�6T11 JLAX and Hermosa Ran..Cucamonga,California Lhale2iMev�ePjopent LAI`IDS A,,C.,,Vq (tPE PF • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Michael Smith April 1, 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00696 - 6TH & HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC - A request to construct two industrial warehouse/office buildings with a combined floor area of about 100,000 square feet on a parcel of about 4.87 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 5, located at 9212 Hermosa Avenue - APN: 0209-211-41. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18872. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18872 - 6TH & HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC - A proposal to subdivide a property of 4.87 acres in conjunction with a request to construct two industrial warehouse/office buildings with a combined floor area of about 100,000 square feet in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 5, located at 9212 Hermosa Avenue - APN: 0209-211-41. Related file: Development Review DRC2007-00696. Design Parameters: The project site is a rectangular parcel of about 627 feet (north-south) by 338 feet (east-west). The site is vacant and is dominated by short grasses, shrubs, and a grouping of trees. The property is bound on the east by Hermosa Avenue and on the south by 6th Street. To the north is a large warehouse distribution building of about 400,000 square feet and to the west is an office complex consisting of four buildings of 20,000 square feet each. Across the streets to the south and east, respectively, are a large warehouse distribution building of about 400,000 square feet and an office/warehouse complex consisting of six buildings of various sizes. The zoning of the property and surrounding properties is General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 5. The sub ect roe P rtY all level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1,078 feet and 1,069 feet r spect velynerally The applicant proposes to construct two warehouse distribution buildings of 421410 square feet (Building A) and 62,606 square feet (Building B). The buildings are speculative at this time, but, as typical these types of buildings, small offices are included. The office area will be located along the southeast comer comer of each building. The dock loading/storage area for each building will be located in a common area between the buildings. There will be two points of access—one via Hermosa Avenue and another via 6th Street. There will be an additional access point from Hermosa Avenue for emergency Access to the loading/storage area will be via the driveway at Hermosa Avenue. Building A and Building B will have 50 and 61 spaces, respectively, for a combined 111 g y Purposes. customers: This quantity exceeds the minimum parking requirement of for the site.isLands Lor a ndscape coverage is 14.9 percent; the minimum requirement is 7 percent for this development district. The proposed buildings will be of concrete tilt-up construction painted with a palette of five different colors. An additional primary material will be sandblasted concrete while a secondary material will be glass panels. Key features include tower elements that project beyond the primary wall plane and above the edge of the primary parapet at all four corners and at the midpoint of the north and south elevations of Buildings A and B, respectively. Glass is generously incorporated around each office area emphasizing its importance as the main entry into the building. In addition to the glazing, each tower at the offices includes a cornice, decorative medallions, and a different paint color. Each office entrance will also have a metal canopy. Glass panels with a dimension of 5 feet by 5 feet have also been incorporated at equal intervals along the wall planes between the tower elements, on the east elevation (of both buildings), on the south elevation (of Building B), and on the north elevation (of Building �imilAlthough glass has not been provided on the interior facing elevations where the dock loadingan torage areas are, staff believes that their absence is not detrimental to the overall design ofbuilding.A) arly, glass has not been used on the we d � west elevations of both buildings and sparingly onethe north EOXHrBir � s J I Item F19 I' DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2007-00696- 6TH & HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC April 1, 2008 Page 2 elevation of Building A. Staff believes that glass should be applied on the comers of the building closest to the street. Sandblasted wall panels have been used on all tower elements except-the office towers. Instead of sandblasting, the applicant is proposing a slight change in paint color to differentiate these locations from the rest of their respective buildings. Staff accepts this solution. However, the difference between paint colors should be bolder. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. Paint each office tower a bolder color such as dark red, blue; or green to further differentiate them from the remainder of their respective buildings. As presented the building is dominated by colors in the same color scale and the office towers should not be another shade of the same color. 2. Provide additional glazing on the west elevation of the southwest tower element of Building B. The glazing should be duplicated in order to a) balance it with its south elevation, and b) enhance aesthetically this readily visible corner as seen from 6th Street. 3. Provide additional glazing on the east elevation of the northeast tower element of Building A. The glazing should be duplicated in order to a) balance it with its south elevation, and b) enhance aesthetically this readily visible corner as seen from Hermosa Avenue. 4. Provide a continuous form-lined relief (or equivalent) along the entire top edge of the parapets of the wall planes located between the tower elements. 5. Paint the depressed areas at each tower (where glass has not been provided) a dark glossy blue to match the color of the glazing. This will present the appearance of glass without having to actually use glass. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Landscaping at the southeast corner of the site shall be intensified to ensure that the presence of the parking lot immediately adjacent to this corner is minimized. 2. All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, fire department connections, back-flow devices, etc. shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on-center. 3. The employee lunch area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on-center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Also, each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural finishes/trim used on the building such as sandblasted bases. The trellis shall be painted to match the building. 4. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. Incorporate undulating berms along the street frontages, within the landscape setback and landscape areas. The highest part of the berms should be at least 3 feet in height. F Item F20 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2007-00696—6TH & HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC • April 1, 2008 Page 3 2. Decorative paving shall be provided at the vehicular access points on to the site. 3. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 4. Provide durable street furniture in outdoor employee eating area, such as tables, chairs, waste receptacles. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved, subject to the revisions above which can be verified by staff, and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Michael Smith The Design Review Committee recommends to the Planning Commission approval of the project subject to the following revisions to be verified by staff: 1. A chamfered, "reverse" cornice shall be provided at the top of the parapet walls on all elevations • except at the office "towers' where the decorative cornice that is currently shown may be used. 2. The checkerboard pattern reveals proposed at various tower insets by the applicant shall be repeated at the northeast tower (north elevation) and southwest tower (west elevation) of Building B. 3. Contact the Engineering Department to determine which overhead utilities will be required to be placed below ground. 4. Contact the adjacent property owner to the west to coordinate the design, installation, and maintenance of the decorative paving at the entrance to the shared driveway located at the southwest corner of the project site. 5. The green color scheme is approved. • i t f Item F21 STAFF REPORT � PLANNING DEPARTMENr -� Date: June 26, 2013 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C;UCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: TIME EXTENSION DRC2013-00326 - PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A request to extend the duration of an existing entitlement approval by an additional two (2) years for an industrial warehouse/office project comprised of two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 100,000 square feet on a parcel of about 212,000 square feet (4.87 acres) within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at 9212 Hermosa Avenue - APN: 0209-211-41. Related files: Development Review DRC2007-00696 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18872. The Planning Commission determined that the project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions and Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects. Per Section 15162, no further _ environmental review is required as there are no changes to the project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Time Extension DRC2013-00326 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. ANALYSIS: A. General: In April 2013, the applicant, Phelan Development Company, submitted a request to extend the duration of the entitlement approval (hereafter referred to as a "time extension") for Development Review DRC2007-00696. The applicant does not propose any changes to the project (Exhibit A). The project was originally reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on May 14, 2008 (Exhibits B and C). Per Resolution of Approval No. 08-19, Standard Condition B.1, the approval of the project was set to expire "if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within five (5) years from the date of approval." With the exception of tentative tract/parcel maps, a time extension for any development review entitlement was not allowed. Thus, the approval of this project was set to expire on May 14, 2013. In September 2012 the City officially adopted an updated Development Code. Included in the update was a new Code section that allows for applicants to request time extensions for all entitlements. Per Section 17.14.090(C), an initial time extension request may be granted that extends the expiration date for two (2) years from the original expiration date. Near the end of that two-year period, a second, and final, time extension request may be granted that extends the expiration date for one (1) additional year beyond the expiration date granted by the first time extension. Both time extension requests are subject to the review and approval by the same authority that approved the original project. If the applicant's request is granted, the approval of the project will expire on May 14, 2015. B. Grading, Technical, and Design Review Committees: On April 1, 2008, all of the review Committees analyzed the original project and recommended approval to the Planning Commission. Their conditions were subsequently incorporated into the Resolution of Approval (Resolution No. EXHIBIT C Item F22 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00326 — PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY June 26, 2013 ® Page 2 08-19) for the project. As the applicant does not propose any changes to the project in conjunction with this time extension request, no further action by any of the Committees is necessary. The Committees' original conditions of approval continue to apply, and this is noted in the attached Resolution of Approval. C. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18872: The associated tentative parcel map is not included in this time extension request. Although the approval of the tentative parcel map was set to expire on May 14, 2011, three (3) years after the date of the original approval, a time extension for the tentative parcel map is not necessary at this time. The State legislature passed two bills, AB333 and A6208, in July 2009 and July 2011, respectively. These bills automatically extended the duration of the approval period for all tentative maps that were set to expire on or before January 1, 2012, (AB333) and on or before January 1, 2014, (AB208). The duration of the combined time extensions granted by both bills is four (4) years. Therefore, the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18872 is now set to expire on May 14, 2015. D. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission determined that the original project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions and Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects in connection with the City's approval of Development Review DRC2007-00696 in December 2008. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required in connection with • subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No changes are proposed to the project; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; and no new important information shows that the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered. There are no changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated when concluding the project was categorically exempt. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not analyzed in the previous environmental review, and will not have more severe effects than previously analyzed. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received. Respectfully submitted, ace u nett Planning Manager CB:MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Time Extension Request Letters (prepared by the applicant) Exhibit B - Staff Report for Development Review DRC2007-00696 and Tentative Parcel • Map SUBTT18872 Exhibit C - Resolution of Approval No. 08-19 for Development Review DRC2007-00696 Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2013-00326 Item F23 RESOLUTION NO. 08-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00696, A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT TWO INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE/OFFICE BUILDINGS WITH A COMBINED FLOOR AREA OF ABOUT 100,000 SQUARE FEET ON A PARCEL OF ABOUT 4.87 ACRES IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT, SUBAREA 5, LOCATED AT 9212 HERMOSA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0209-211-41. A. Recitals. I. 6th& Hermosa JP/DF, LLC filed an application for the issuance of Development Review DRC2007-00696, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as 'the application." 2. On the 14th day of May 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 14,2008,including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel of land located at 9212 Hermosa Avenue with an overall area of about 212,137 square feet(4.87 acres), and a street frontage along 6th Street of about 338 feet and a street frontage along Hermosa Avenue of about 627 feet; and b. To the north is a large warehouse distribution building of about 400,000 square feet and to the west is an office complex consisting of four 20,000 square feet buildings. Across the streets to the south and east, respectively, is a large warehouse distribution building of about 400,000 square feet and an officetwarehouse complex consisting of six buildings of various sizes; and C. The proposed development is in conjunction with a tentative parcel map(Related. File: SUBTPM18872) to subdivide the property into two (2) parcels of 2 acres and 2.77 acres (Parcels 1 and 2, respectively). ! i d. The applicant proposes to construct two buildings totaling 44,410 square feet on Parcel 1 (Building A) and 60,606 square feet on Parcel 2 (Building B); and f { EXHIBIT ® item F24 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-19 DRC2007-00696—6TH& HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC • May 14, 2008 Page 2 e. The application contemplates warehouse tenants. Warehouse intensive uses are permitted in this development district. Additional potential tenants include manufacturing uses which are permitted subject to the availability of parking on-site; and f. The applicant is required to provide 47 and 57 parking stalls for Building A and B, respectively. They have provided 50 and 61 parking stalls for each respective building; and 3.. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed project is to construct an industrial building and is consistent with development in the vicinity. b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable theretowill not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to prope,rties or improvements in the vicinity. The surrounding properties are zoned industrial and the surrounding uses are industrial-oriented. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development • Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions as the project proposes the subdivision of one parcel into two parcels and Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects as the project site is surrounded on all sides by existing industrial development. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction of two warehouse buildings with a combined floor area of 105,016 square feet in the General Industrial District, Subarea 5, located at the northwest comer of 6th Street and Hermosa Avenue-APN: 0209-211-41. 2) Proposed land uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit as identified in • Table 17.30.030 of the Development Code, shall require a separate review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check and occupancy. r Item F25 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-19 DRC2007-00696—6TH & HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC May 14, 2008 Page 3 3) Shared access,parking,and maintenance shall be incorporated in the project Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). 4) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 5) All walls, including retaining walls, exposed to public shall be decorative masonry. Decorative means slump stone, split-face, or stucco. 6) Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the 35-foot setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. 7) All trash enclosures shall be surrounded with dense shrub plantings. 8) Provide an overhead trellis at the employee lunch area. The overhead trellis shall have cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Also,each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the building. Also, provide durable street furniture in the outdoor employee eating area such as tables, chairs, waste receptacles. 9) Incorporate undulating berms along both 6th Street and Hermosa Avenue,within the landscape setback and landscape areas. 10) All ground-mounted equipment, utility boxes including transformers, and back-flow devices shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on-center, ' 11) Landscaping shall be installed prior to release for occupancy. 12) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low pressure spray. Engineering Department 1) Full frontage improvements shall be installed on 6th Street at the "Secondary Arterial"street standard width including asphalt pavement, curb and gutter, drive approach, curvilinear sidewalk, street trees, curbside drain outlet,9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights and traffic signing and striping. Protect all existing public improvements or repair/replace, i as required. Item F26 I ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-19 ORC2007-00696—6TH & HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC May 14, 2008 • Page 4 a) The drive approach is to be per City Standard No. 101, Type C and be a minimum of 35 feet wide. Curvilinear sidewalk shall cross the drive approach at the 0-inch curb face(non-contiguous sidewalk). b) Relocate 66kV poles as needed for street construction and added width of existing drive approach. 2) Hermosa Avenue is a City "Secondary Arterial" Street. Install all missing public improvements including property line adjacent sidewalk, drive approach, street trees, curbside drain outlet(s), and local storm drain as determined by final drainage report. a) Protect all existing public improvements or repair, replace as required. b) Emergency access at the north end of the parking lot shall be per Fire and City Traffic Engineer requirements. 3) The existing overhead utilities (communications and electrical,except of the 66kV electrical) on the project side of 6th Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the east side of Hermosa Avenue • to the first pole off-site west of the west project boundary,prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing 6th Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. The City has collected fees from development on the south side of the street which will be used to reimburse this developer fora portion of the cost. The developer shall request a reimbursement agreement to recover a portion of the cost upon completion. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 4) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top-of-curb to one-half beyond the ultimate right-of-way along all street frontages. Building and Safetv Department (Grading) 1) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide a letter from the norther) wner accepting storm water ruoff into the existing drainage ditch north of the northerly Property linen In the event permission is not granted by the northerly property owner,all roof and other on-site waters will be required to drain within the project limits to an appropriate outlet. ' f } Along the west roe line, the applicant is conditioned to provide 2 g property rty ' structural calculations showing that the existing wall can retain ® proposed loadings. Item F27 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-19 DRC2007-00696—6TH 8, HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC May 14, 2008 Page 5 3) Safety rails will be required per the latest adopted edition of the California Building Code. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: am S , Chairman ATTEST: Jam Troyer, AICP, Secret I, James R.Troyer,AICP,Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE i i p Item F28 I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - ENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00696 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: 6TH& HERMOSA JP/DF, LLC LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND HERMOSA AVENUE—APN: 0209-211-41 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: •A. General Requirements completion-- te 1• The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense agents,officers,or employees,because of the issuance of uchtapprovalion g,or nht 9 he aRemative,ainst the City its I / relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the Ci ty, its agents,employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its so er discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 08-19, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s)are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption-$5o B• Time Limits 1• Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or � allorwed use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are • 1 Item F29 Project No. l C2007-00696 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site pians,architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department,the conditions contained herein,and Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shaft be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and streetimprovement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building,etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan,Including a photometric diagram,shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style,illumination, location,height,and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers,AC condensers, etc.,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berrning,and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments,transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified In a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 10. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner,homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If _ wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort o work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify,by mail,all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project's perimeter. 2 Item F30 Project No.DRC20_ 07.00896 COmplet�On pace D. Industrial Buildings 0 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 3. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking"and for"employee parking only., E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound bproperties and uffered from adjacent streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall adjacent architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts _ a building,wall,support column, or other obstruction,the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). --� • 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles,entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of buildiineer, and ng permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn- around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _ parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total n stalls for use by the handicapped. umber of 6. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls.Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide Motorcycle —'� rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 6 square feet. G. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces,whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided,additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater,the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. • 3 1 Item F31 Project No.DRC20_ 07.00698 2• Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be rovidedComalei_-- commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. if —!/ covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. 3. For industrial projects with at least 40 car parking spaces, bicyclist-changing facilities shall be _ provided to encourage bicycle commuting per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Bicycle / Transportation Plan adopted by City Council Resolution No.02-237. Accessible restrooms with storage lockers for clothing and equipment shall be sufficient. H. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan,including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office projects,shall be specimen size trees-24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. / 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. Special landscape features such as mounding,alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks(with horizontal change),and intensified landscaping,is required along 6th Street and Hermosa Avenue. 6. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. 7. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. I. Signs 1. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. J. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S.Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for / mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT,(909)477-27101 FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: f NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1• Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; 4 Item F32 Project No.DRC2o_ o7_oo696 Comoletion Date C. Floor Plan; ® d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets,detached) including the size of the main switch,number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans,including isometrics,underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning;and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC2007-00696) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations,energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Department. L. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _ marked with the project file number(i.e.,DRC2007-00696). The applicant shall comply with the /J latest adopted Califomia Codes,and all other applicable codes,ordinances, and regulations in • effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,Transportation Development Fee,Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map / recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/____� through Saturday,with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter). M. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use,area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505. • 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 5 i s i Item F33 j Project No._aRC20�00696 completion Date 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. N. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading _/ ! Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Cafrfomia to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. --�--� 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuan permits. ce of building APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from street centerline): 44 total feet on Hermosa Avenue. Al total feet on 6th Street. —� 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 3. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by _/ ! deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits,where no map is involved. 4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. —�—/_ P. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No.68-557,no person shall make connections from a source _ of energy,fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes / and for which a permit is required unless,in addition to any and all other codes,regulations and ordinances,all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except:that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 6 i Item F34 i Proiect No.DRC20G7•mu • Com letion Date 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: _ • / /_ Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Street Name Gutter Pvmt Comm Median Bike walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Hermosa Avenue (b) X X 61h Street X X (c) X X X (e) (e) Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e)Curbside drain outlets. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans,including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any / other permits required. C. Pavement striping,marking,traffic signing,street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _ project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and • interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside Of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No.6 at Intersections and No.5 along streets,a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e• Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per C' Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. �' f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9• Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. —� h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. I I Item F35 Project No.pRC2007-00696 Completion pate 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet _(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required,tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Street Name Botanical Name Grow Common Name Space Spacing Size Oty. Hermosa Avenue P.A.8 feet or greater Platanus acedfoiia London Plane Tree 8 feet 30 feet o.c. 30 feet Fill-in P.A,less than 8 feet Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybrid 3 feet 20 feet o.c. 20 feet Fill-in No utilities 'Catawba' -Dark Purple Use Platanus as on-site Standard Background tree P.A.less than 8 feet Magnolia grandiflora Crape Myrtle Hybrid Under utilities 'Majestic Beauty° -Dark Purple 3 feet 20 feet o.c. 24-inch Fill-In Use Platanus as on-site Background tree 6th Street Magnolia grandiflora NCN :3feeJt20 30 feet o.c. 15-gallon Fill-in P.A.8 feet or more 'Majestic Beauty, P.A less than 8 feet Magnolia grandiflora NCN feet o.. 15-gallon Fill-in Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting,an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments,as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. Q. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be bome by the developer. 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan for 6th Street. R. Improvement Completion 1. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for all public improvements. i 1 8 Item F36 ' Project No.DRC2007-00696 Completion Date OS. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel Including sanitary sewerage system,water,gas, _ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility / /— Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVW D),Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required priorto final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval projects. in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. T. General Requirements and Approvals 1. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for all public improvements. —� 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City,covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation,prior to final ma —/—� permit issuance if no map is involved. P approval or prior to building • 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits,a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundablemrf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted fro landfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted m the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. / These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. — —�- 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings,with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. V. Security Hardware 1• One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within _ 40 inches of any locking device,tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. / • 2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. 9 i i Item F37 t Project No.DRC2007-00696 Com�iei t'o— ^mete 3. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars,metal gates, or alarmed. W. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code Prevention Unit along with plan .The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime s. If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909)941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at(909)477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. X. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. 2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. 3. At the entrances of commercial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of project shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover. North shall be at the top and so indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Department. Y. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in tum save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number. (909)941-1488. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED - f i fi 10 I f Item F38 i Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District • Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS April 24, 2008 6`'&Hermosa Ave Industrial 9212 Turner Ave. (Hermosa) (2) Industrial Buildings SUBTPM18872&DRC2007-00696 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at hfti)://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply I. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: • a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de- sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: I. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street,whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5. A minimum of forty-feet(40')from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building,additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 3375 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50- percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix,as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 3. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until public fire protection water plans are approved. 5. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. Item F39 FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the2007 California Fire Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance FD46 and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System & Sprinkler Monitoring I. The 2007 Califomia Building Code,the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard, Ordinance FD46 and/or the 2007 California Fire Code require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitoring by Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system fire may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building.Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads,streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures I" story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access,measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: 2 Item F40 a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates,plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. • b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for$20.00. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail- safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices(TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall.be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduc architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. ed on the 6. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. • a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Aerosol Products • Application of Flammable Finishes Magnesium Working • Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation Automobile Wrecking Yards Battery Systems Open Burning Candles and open flames in public assemblies Organic Coating • Ovens Cellulose Nitrate Powder Coating 3 Item F41 • Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Cryogenics Pyrotechnical Special Effects • Dry Cleaning Plants Dust-Producing Processes and Operations Radioactive Materials • p Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids Rubbish Handling Operations • Fruit Ripening Plants Spraying Dipping • Hazardous Materials or Operations Tents,Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) Tire Storage • Liquefied Petroleum Gases Welding and Cutting Operations • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials—Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire,Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency(CUPA)for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building& Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP)may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials- Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2007Califomia Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing,Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD46 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the$92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1. RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement,prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement—Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement,favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject Property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement 4 Item F42 shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. • Reciprocal water covenant—Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the.parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS—Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site(private)fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witnesst flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. by an 02. Public Water Supply(Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grana clearance before lumer is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be pavet accordance with all the requirements of th RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14'6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". i OMOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER 5 Item F43 I The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION—Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property,the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant locatiori. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor,developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4, Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed,.tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system(subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected,tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected,tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that-prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8 '/Z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 6 Item F44 RESOLUTION NO. 13-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DURATION OF AN EXISTING ENTITLEMENTAPPROVAL BY AN ADDITIONAL TWO (2) YEARS FOR AN INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE/OFFICE PROJECT COMPRISED OF TWO(2) BUILDINGS WITH A COMBINED FLOOR AREA OF ABOUT 100,000 SQUARE FEET ON A PARCEL OF ABOUT 212,000 SQUARE FEET(4.87 ACRES)WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 9212 HERMOSA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0209-211-41. A. Recitals. 1. Phelan Development Company filed an application for the extension of the duration of the entitlement approval ("time extension")for Development Review DRC2007-00696, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject time extension request is referred to as "the application," DRC2013-00326. 2. On May 14, 2008, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 08-19,thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On the June 26, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 26, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant does not propose any changes to the original project in conjunction with this time extension request; b. The previously approved Development Review is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes and policies; C. The extension of the Development Review approval will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes or policies; d. The extension of the Development Review approval will not be detrimental to the • public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and EXHIBIT E Item F45 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-25 TIME EXTENSION DRC2013-00326—PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY June 26, 2013 Page 2 e. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document. is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission determined that the original project was cate exempt from the requirements of the Californiaorically ia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions and Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects in connection with the City's approval of Development Review DRC2007-00696 in December 2008. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No changes are proposed to the project;no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; and no new important information shows that the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered. There are no changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated when concluding the project was categorically exempt. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not analyzed in the previous environmental review and will not have more severe effects than previously analyzed. b. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Time Extension DRC2013-00326 for Development Review DRC2007-00696. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby extends the duration of an existing entitlement approval by an additional two(2) years and modifies the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 08-19 to read as follows: Planning Deaartment 1) Approval is for the extension of the duration of the entitlement approval (time extension) for Development Review DRC2007-00696 and modification of the applicable approval time limit as described in Standard Condition B.1 contained in Resolution No. 08-19 that was adopted by the Planning Commission on May 14, 2008. 2) The time extension of the entitlement approval is for two(2)years. The new expiration date for Development Review DRC2007-00696 is May 14, 2015. 3) Any requests for future time extensions shall be subject to the procedures, conditions,and findings as set forth in Section 17.14.090 of the Development Code. Item F46 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-25 TIME EXTENSION DRC2013-00326 — PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY June 26, 2013 Page 3 4) All other conditions of approval, including all of the standard/special conditions of approval of other City departments, for Development Review DRC2007-00696 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18872 shall apply. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2013 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Frances Howdyshell, Chairman 4 1 ATTEST: 1/t Candyce Burry Secretary 1, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HOWDYSHELL,FLETCHER,MUNOZ,WIMBERLY,OAXACA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Item F47 RESOLUTION NO. 15-39 ® A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DURATION OF AN EXISTING ENTITLEMENT APPROVAL BY AN ADDITIONAL ONE (1) YEAR FOR AN INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE/OFFICE PROJECT COMPRISED OF TWO(2) BUILDINGS WITH A COMBINED FLOOR AREA OF ABOUT 100,000 SQUARE FEET ON A PARCEL OF ABOUT 212,000 SQUARE FEET(4.87 ACRES)WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 9212 HERMOSA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 0209-211-41. A. Recitals. 1. 61 & Hermosa JP/DF, LLC filed an application for the extension of the duration of the entitlement approval ("time extension") for Development Review DRC2007-00696, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject time extension request is referred to as "the application," DRC2015-00244. 2. On May 14, 2008, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-19, thereby approving the Development Review DRC2007-00696 subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. In April of 2013, the applicant submitted a request to extend the duration of the entitlement approval for DRC2007-0696 (related file: Time Extension DRC2013-00326) by two • (2) years. This time extension request was approved by the Planning Commission on June 26, 2013. The new date that the entitlement was set to expire was May 14, 2015. 4. On the May 27, 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 27, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant does not propose any changes to the original project in conjunction with this time extension request; b. The previously approved Development Review is in substantial compliance with • the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes and policies; C. The extension of the Development Review approval will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes or policies; Item F48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-39 TIME EXTENSION DRC2015-00244— PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY May 27, 2015 Page 2 d. The extension of the Development Review approval will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and e. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission determined that the original project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions and Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects in connection with the City's approval of Development Review DRC2007-00696 on May 14, 2008. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No changes are proposed to the project; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; and no new important information shows that the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered. There are no changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated when concluding the project was categorically exempt. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not analyzed in the previous environmental review and will not have more severe effects than previously analyzed. b. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2015-00244 for Development Review DRC2007-00696. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby extends the duration of the existing entitlement approval by an additional one (1)year, and modifies the applicable conditions of approval that relate to the expiration of the entitlement approval for Development Review DRC2007-00696 in Resolution No. 08-19. The modified conditions are listed in the attached Conditions of Approval. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY 2015 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Item F49 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-39 TIME EXTENSION DRC2015-00244— PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY May 27, 2015 • Page 3 BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • Item F50 Conditions of.Approval MHo c;rAON c> Community Development Department Project#: DRC2015-00244 Project Name: DRC2007-00696 TIME EXTENSION Location: ---020921141-0000 Project Type: Time Extension ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for the extension of the duration of the entitlement approval (time extension) for Development Review DRC2007-00696 and modification of the applicable approval time limit as described in Standard Condition 6.1 contained in Resolution No. 08-19 that was adopted by the Planning Commission on May 14, 2008. 2. The time extension of the entitlement approval is for one (1) year. The new expiration date for Development Review DRC2007-00696 is May 14, 2016. 3. All other conditions of approval included in Resolution No. 08-19 and Resolution No. 13-25, and including all of the standard/special conditions of approval of other City departments, for Development Review DRC2007-00696 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18872 shall apply. www.CityofRC.us Printed:517/2015 Item F51 STAFF REPORT • PL-1NNING DEP_- R'i,NIENT J t DATE: May 27, 2015 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission �,;UCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2015-00278— LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE (formerly known as 909 Pub and Grill): A request to modify an existing Entertainment Permit to add additional live entertainment to an existing 5,300 square foot restaurant which provides live entertainment comprised of karaoke, live bands, and dancing within the Industrial Park (IP) District, within the Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD), located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A; APN: 0229-012-22. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673, Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2015-00279, and Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality_ Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 — Existing Facilities. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2015-00279— LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE (formerly known as 909 Pub and Grill): A request to • modify an existing Conditional Use Permit to extend the hours of operation of an existing 5,300 square foot restaurant within the Industrial Park (IP) District, within the Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD), located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A; APN: 0229-012-22. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673, Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563, and Entertainment Permit Modification DRC2015-00278. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 — Existing Facilities. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00279 and Entertainment Permit DRC2015-00278 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. BACKGROUND: The subject location has been the site of two previous restaurants with bars. The first, Bellissimo Pizza and Pasta, was granted the approval to operate under Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00785 on October 22, 2002. Following the closing of that restaurant in 2009, the entitlement to operate expired. The second restaurant, Tropica Restaurant and Bar was granted a new approval to operate under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 on September 27, 2011 (Exhibit K). The business license for Tropica Restaurant and Bar expired on November 27, 2012 and the tenant space was verified as vacant during an inspection by the Business License Department on April 18, 2013. In August of 2013, 909 Pub and Grill opened for business operating as a restaurant with a bar under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673. Per Section 17.14.090 (D) of the Development Code, all permits and entitlements expire when a business is closed for more than one calendar year. The business license for 909 Sports Lounge to operate the restaurant with the bar was approved within this one-year timeframe in August 2013, following Item G,H1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00279 AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-00278—LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 2 receipt of confirmation that 909 Sports Lounge would comply with the conditions of approval for the existing Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 described in Resolution No. 11-18 (Exhibit Q. On July 8, 2013, 909 Pub and Grill applied for Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563. This request was to provide live entertainment comprised of karaoke, live bands, and dancing in conjunction with the existing restaurant and bar. On November 13, 2013, the Planning Commission approved this request with conditions of approval as described in Resolution 13-53 (Exhibit M). Shortly after opening, there were a series of violations of the terms of the Entertainment Permit. Specifically, there was entertainment provided by a DJ in addition to the approved dancing, live . bands, and karaoke activities. This started as early as December 2013 and was verified by viewing their Facebook account and website. On March 27, 2014, deputies from the Sheriff's Department conducted a site visit during operating hours. The deputies observed a DJ setting-up equipment and then playing music. Upon further investigation, the deputies determined that the performance of a DJ was an ongoing event. A review of their Facebook account revealed they were advertising a DJ on the premises. Also, the deputies noted that the uniforms worn by the security__gua_rds.were inconsistent with the Sheriffs Department's requirements...._The...guards_were. wearing suits that caused them to "blend into the crowd" of patrons, and were not clearly identifiable. Recognizing that the City needed to proactively engage the owner/operator of 909 Pub & Grill to discuss these issues, on April 26, 2014 staff from the Planning and Sheriff's Departments met with Priscilla Abundis, a representative from 909 Pub & Grill. Staff explained to her that the violations were cause for a re-evaluation of the restaurant's Conditional Use Permit and Entertainment Permit. The City's expectations for how the restaurant is supposed to operate were also discussed. Ms. Abundis said the DJ was no longer present at the restaurant and that she would have the security guards' uniforms revised. By June 2014 there was no further reference to a DJ on the restaurant's Facebook account. During these meetings, Ms. Abundis expressed to Staff the desire to eventually revise restaurant's operating hours and add a DJ. According to the conditions of approval for the existing Entertainment Permit and Conditional Use Permit, any requests to add other types of entertainment or change the operating hours requires the review and approval by the Planning Commission. Staff explained to her that because of the aforementioned violations, Staff could not reasonably recommend approval to the Planning Commission of any requests for modifying the applicable permits. Staff suggested to her that she postpone submitting such requests until the restaurant had a record of about six (6) months that show continuous compliance with the existing conditions of approval. The Sheriff's Department was in agreement with this waiting period. Ms. Abundis understood this and elected to wait. On March 12, 2015, representatives from 909 Pub & Grill, now operating as 909 Sports Lounge, submitted Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00279, to modify the hours of operation of the restaurant, and Entertainment Permit DRC2015-00278, to modify the entertainment offered by adding a DJ and live comedy. Item G,H2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00279 AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-00278—LEON • FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 3 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Site - Commercial/Office Complex — Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) North - Commercial Center — Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista Community Plan South - Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex— General Industrial (GI) District East - Legal, Non-Conforming Residence and Commercial/Office Complex — Industrial Park (IP) District and General Commercial (GC) District West - Varies (commercial, industrial, and vacant property) — Industrial Park (IP) District B. General Plan Designations: Site - General Commercial North - General Commercial South - Parks East. - ...General.Commercial -- - - - - West - Industrial Park C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a tenant space located within Masi Plaza, a • commercial/office complex of about 1,030,000 square feet (23.6 acres) that is about 1,250 feet (east to west) by about 915 feet (north to south) located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue (Exhibit B). The commercial complex is divided by two minor streets, Masi Drive and Sebastian Way, into two (2) parts. The larger, 15-acre part is generally rectangular in shape and is bound by Foothill Boulevard to the north and Rochester Avenue to the east, with the minor streets on the west and south, respectively. On the opposite side of these minor streets is the remaining, `L'-shaped, 8.6-acre portion. The complex is comprised of numerous buildings with a combined floor area of about 267,500 square feet. The specific location of the project site is one of the in-line tenant spaces at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A, in the largest building that is situated in the center of the complex (Exhibit C). The largest tenant within this building is 24 Hour Fitness. Other tenants within this building include Roger Dunn Golf and Vista Paint. The other buildings are single- tenant pad buildings or multi-tenant buildings situated along the above-noted streets (Exhibit 1). The buildings along Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue are occupied by restaurants such as Denny's, Wabi Sabi, and Jack in the Box. The buildings along Masi Drive and Sebastian Way are occupied by automotive repair shops and commercial offices. D. Surrounding Area: To the north of the subject commercial/office complex is a commercial center that includes Home Depot, The Spaghetti Factory, and ARCO. To the east is a legal, non-conforming residence and a commercial/office complex. To the south is the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex operated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. To the west is a vacant property, an industrial building, and Carrow's Restaurant. The commercial/office complex is zoned Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD). The properties to the west are zoned Industrial Park (IP) District while the properties to the ® south are zoned General Industrial (GI) District. The properties to the east are zoned Industrial Park (IP) District and General Commercial (GC) District. Item G,H3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00279 AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-00278—LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 4 E. Parking Calculations: The parking requirements for the restaurant and bar, and parking availability within the commercial complex, were analyzed during the review of Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673. At that time, it was concluded that there was a sufficient amount of parking for the restaurant and the other tenants within the. complex. As the modifications to the Conditional Use Permit and Entertainment Permit do not include an increase in the floor area of the restaurant, the results of the previous analysis still apply and no new parking calculation is necessary. For reference, the parking calculations from the Staff Report for the Planning Director public hearing on September 27, 2011 for Tropica Restaurant and Bar are as follows: Type Floor Parking #of Spaces # of Spaces of Use Area (SF) Ratio Required Provided Food Uses 22,500 5/1000 112.5 113 (<15%) Food Uses _74—- - - -- Fitness Center 42,000 6.6/1000 277.2 278 Retail/Service/ 81,340 5/1000 406.5 412 Office Totals 153,200' 869.8 877? 'This total floor area calculation is only for the area of the commercial complex between Foothill Boulevard and Sebastian Way and east of Masi Drive. 2This total parking stall calculation is only for the area of the commercial complex between Foothill Boulevard and Sebastian Way and east of Masi Drive. ANALYSIS: A. General: The floor plan was originally approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 and reviewed again under Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563. The principal dining area is located near the front of the restaurant while the bar, stage and associated seating/service areas are located in the middle of the restaurant. Several tables of seating are removed during entertainment hours in order to provide space for a dance floor. An office, the kitchen, and restrooms comprise the remainder of the restaurant's floor area (Exhibit D). The floor plan is not proposed to be altered by the addition of more live entertainment. Furthermore, the restaurant currently serves a full menu of items, i.e., the menu includes a variety of food that is typical of a full-service restaurant (Exhibit H). Item G,H4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00279 AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-00278- LEON • FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 5 Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00279: The operating hours of the restaurant and bar are currently between 11:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m. (midnight) Monday through Thursday, and between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. Friday through Sunday. The hours of operation that include live entertainment are currently between 8:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. (midnight) on Thursday, between 8:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday, and between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. on Sunday. The applicant, on behalf of 909 Sports Lounge, is proposing to modify the existing hours of operation. The proposal includes new operating hours of the restaurant and bar to be between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m. Monday through Sunday. The hours of operation for the live entertainment are proposed to be between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m. on Sundays and 8:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Thursday through Saturday. Entertainment Permit DRC2015-00278: The entertainment currently consists of live music, dancing, and karaoke to complement the restaurant and bar. The televisions are mounted to the walls throughout the dining and bar area. The live music ranges from solo musicians to five-piece bands who perform on a stage of 108 square feet near the bar area. Dancing is in an area of about 84 square feet immediately in front of the stage - the two (2) tables located there are moved to make room during the. hours when. there is entertainment. . Karaoke is. also performed on this stage when there are no live music performances. The applicant, on behalf of 909 Sports Lounge, proposes to add a DJ and live comedy to the existing live entertainment. The DJ or comedian would be located on the 12' by 9' stage area while • performing during live entertainment hours. B. Security Procedures. The security procedures that were originally reviewed and accepted by the City during the review of Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563 will remain unchanged. The security procedures discuss the use of force, incident report writing, firearms/weapons, and uniforms for security staff, door policy, and security rules (Exhibit F). The applicant has two (2) licensed security guards on the premises when live music is performed. One of these security guards is posted outside the restaurant to monitor activity in the parking lot and general vicinity. Included in the original conditions of approval were requirements that each security guard's uniform have the word "Security" on it and that all managers, bartenders, and servers complete the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program offered by the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control within 30 days of being hired (Exhibit E and G). San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department: The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department has reviewed the subject applications and do not object to the expansion of live entertainment or the proposed hours of operation. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department informed staff that 909 Sports Lounge has had several minor calls for service since Deputies conducted their site visit in March of 2014. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department has no new conditions of approval and the conditions of approval described within Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 (Resolution 11-18) and Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563 (Resolution 13-53) still apply and are listed in both draft resolutions. • C. Land Use Compatibility: The use will be consistent with the site's development district and the surrounding land uses. The restaurant is within a commercial complex that is comprised of a variety of commercial tenants including retailers, personal services, and restaurants. There Item G,H5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00279 AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-00278—LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 6 are no sensitive land uses in the vicinity of the restaurant. The entertainment activity will be conducted indoors. The restaurant will be required to operate in compliance with the performance standards that are described in Section 17.66 of the Development Code, including noise limits which are described in Section 17.66.050(G). The hours of operation are consistent with operating hours of the commercial center. If operation of this Conditional Use Permit and Entertainment Permit cause adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, the Entertainment Permit can be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities - which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project is for the extension of the hours of operation and the addition of more live_entertainment to the_existing entertainment. No expansion or significant change to the existing tenant space is proposed. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received. Respectfully submitted, Candyce rnett Planning Director CB:MS/NC/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - Floor plan Exhibit E - Business Description Exhibit F - Security Procedures Exhibit G - Brief Description of Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program (from ABC website) Exhibit H - Restaurant/Bar Menu Exhibit I - Tenant List (within the 15-acre part of the commercial center only) Exhibit J - Letters Confirming Compliance with Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 (2013 and 2015) Item G,H6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00279 AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-00278—LEON • FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 7 Exhibit K - Staff Report for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 (September 27, 2011) Without Exhibits and Staff Report for Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563 (November 13, 2013) Without Exhibits Exhibit L - Resolution No. 11-18 for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 (September 27, 2011) Exhibit M - Resolution No. 13-53 for Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563 (November 13, 2013) Draft Resolution of Approval for Entertainment Permit DRC2015-00278 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2015- 00279 Item G,H7 Sf Vp L1 3 '�' i / XOxSE50 Ct 1 m i' �Mv a 3 W '"LXSeuy { LOS 0.409 lila w,wvn - M 940-It Us C t BANYAN ST -38 xu I U.rao MN¢Bt� :. BANYAN ST tz ST Y S p i ©BANYAN AIDlwI "5 NIxlPopon. zx a Y v6p,I CARYN H4 X00. �xn Li Ei ✓ W n: s A4Aiex.. lIXi9 f :i: B. d�. AMS' PKa.4MM t'L 4"f,1, E r S : 1E cR .�+ w S(T • rN �E" 8{�.,PA ? Y 9q e # nxso, c 5 F.0 Nnn a mio x fl k A € r MIGNLWp AlE X L: *4o Kv Mho Ea [ WAY C s e z :u we s, 4`" a • " 3 flr 9 sevo AN' /°k 1qs* - m 4y 'IANJ Nex�:u ISPRNGxs4 3 '3s j 30' GALA ' AVE a coVcs -1p yy q t fwlndl - ^ it s aA AVE e` h 5 F": d i E 3 RANCHO b.. M Wy S w_ >n - O s \� E- 00 - '1 z•cotu �� nx - J .. _ plG1MONGA I Q . h + r�erANv 710Ti S E w §rye, . ' •v.� p 2wuvosows ?� V61YvMl .S 4. "'}4 R I I3 �. IIfi C sw w"hvsr bWxuxe 'N ^v°N^gs °prx p LL , ¢ '^S 1'�Ana Y\ `f'' wn\ p £>. k W:, ' P��T y I t c u Ei /� uw,, �MIAOILL Wfr y P F o- i + w > 3 t[Ytt^. .,., 0\010(17 11( x( .y a �Cfla IRM i'.ARK Y' 4 'BASE LINE •, RD i ., ,:i u.c # ' ` : f a�+'Lo•.m�' strum 3 - y s _ ; :s .'�.N..xg mrrrMb -E[wiusrcr�m[Ntnnw NEWIrMUSE • rnamxLwsl } d L w. WINE SEUnr 'Y. _ m GGppee. .? Ta.`"t �^sxfxnwwc�s *Nnn3 i�artR L.E. pWR nw', +OWIp ralfc r .> �; _ J 3 +€ Flu. `t oc`eLLos. :ravlElrcrwoux a'+L '�p u '• s _ uwr s mexoE i °"'"Y ONA � 41i '- EHCEO BUT MU. CMGfl PROJECT SITE A - F LI _ VICTORIA GARDENS a ucsr wixsl `QyJN CENIERO sf m �cnrYi�orEi •r ns<'n JQ ew,4 ?w,y Ysmu'sr = s mv. C,H m z I'k x.-r,�st � Y Y x a�r..ve�H�__ ?¢� �d jm.ma rsxvuss s p5 crm us TERRA VISTA l >•_omiuc. O ,�1"°wt`v` Kn" ! TOWNCENTER RANCHO Jomxn L u VETGR[A Y SAN ANTONIO - MEOICA( oma` x 55 I s CENTER m 6 'g 4 ' COURT - xxwr>r a roo HOUSE 1A11NEl.i- �SC,ALYPTU5.5) % I y [ws may :CITY HALL n O m uaamvuc rJNu u•Aa rrxu: P(HICE IIERIIAGe vnNr^ - C/STATION HOSPEcAl YI'1C'['+,IER& Y�l - "*.rnunet v.. tRANCTIO (UCA.MON SFR UR _ >` ADULT SPOTS raw rixo SHEISEELTli - ,9 TO W Klu.iT C r w tncpHAUN > A S, W o Z S ¢ 3 JESEY BLVD rr• � 2 •n•aun a m O j ' Mefrollnk •. METROLINK TRAIN srnonIT r, 8TH ST e orr llax ...,. �e - " 3 mm.@r m P6TH ST. EMPIRE.' > 0 6iH Si a RS� a EXHIBIT A ' I Item G,H8 4r > 111 >; F a _ I Q m ENTERTAINMENT PAtMIT DRC2013-00563 W FOOTHILL BLVD g r ui LU LU r Subject Tenant i . d t a E S ace V� .... mind IL J SEBASTIAN WAY s 7 4 l - F .... ADA ACCESSIBILITY . 1 ol3iaieoFAnpr�c ) JUL .. At vll U111100luun(II!II�III11I,. - L <n� m..nrw�..r... .nnv ♦ ••�•••„ AVMNYLLfVB6, m A •• 7 ItlI L_ II _ m O F- _ 1711 Flif a F7r�i._.. 6 _:� _ �y _- O TYPICAL PLAN ��V� s ��' I ] t 9 U1 Vt TYPICAL SECTION A-An 1 - CBC FIG.IIB-23A-TRUNCATED DOMESl m I < AA vcw .mxO ar.owz � All _ �Zm Q'm u BLDG DEPT NOTES.......,<,.,.,..,..„��....a,. � „..r.,........_..,�...„..... ......x..a.,., ..".. ..,.., o ».:.. ....A,.....,.. ..,„„..„.,......„ .,,..,,».....m.....,.w........»..<,„�..... ....,,.w...,„.e..,� A,„.gyp»a„.,.,„.,..,.x ,...„.„...»�< , IRS flZ013 6o S�3 W m • PROPOSED AREA OF WORK PROPOSED AREA OF WORK 2 Y' W tl 9 fLi .TTI TER, Otl SII A tl L� IItpR RTE RI us ,�_ m:,Ifmf `"" _ LIQL \WOMEN'S RR L A.m I' emnbvl fad eea _ �,— Z I STOGE "® r - -_ 1 �alwamEx_ �wuf axx ei rtr m .Q a7�iae1ix' ����� p e � .uxo sex fs T d v C7 x°""a"E vn410 11 p' ap FRET f4MM''I'aRVMFS ` ISI PAT OOAREA(1/` ItIISIiia—E _ r- II IT (E)WALK IN COOLER aTIME { BAR iuOMEN'S RR ED a x rtl�¢afnw eexr +wasx.. o xstl il` " "ooax ws�':^f+u°%+wxw [ - RECEPTION .•.•• sauce ux munEa Ixw xsii« wuvaa. bus xu« ,.w"`rxr I�' 0' vX4i YAb'.��— Rys I A ZT� y � 4]f� .wrcExaE[., Fri Y) c..e. .- CC ; tl"I. BAR AREA Roof" maw OFFICE _o oPATIOAREA O LL a -y 2 :`♦ `. _ l VIP BOTTLE SERVICE AREA I VIP BOTRE SERVICE AREA 4—.1 PATIO AREA : , ! �?.;- I 4u BUILDING ._ .� �� �ji I ws FIRE SPRINKLER L / 1 PLOYE _ 1 `-� RISER ROOM J - - -� PROPOSED AREA OF WORK a <m ADA VAN a.a., FLOOR PLAN Q < ' - ACCESSIBLE �. _ W i z PARKING _ I'� PARTITION PLAN LEGEND DOOR SCHEDULE F ir 0 20 t[ rncm.EE.11RWiEERI 0' :...m.i........,,., n....i��..... 4[ xWE .wuf wrz ADA ACCESSIBLE O a� „a PARKING I _ __�_ nMffi. .•awE LOW PARTITION TYPED'DETAIL .. x W•, O'' m,,..,„.o,�..,..,ry„F, �A-03 909 SPORTS LOUNGE 11849 E. Foothill Blvd, Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, CA • Statement of Operations March 6, 2015 The proposed use will be sports grill style restaurant with DJ and live entertainment and Type 47 ABC license. Restaurant Hours of Operations - Monday-Thursday: 10:00 am to 2:00am Friday- Sunday: 10:00 am to 2:00am DJ & Live Entertainment Hours- Thursday- Saturday: 8:00 pm to 2:00 am Sundays- 11:00 am to 2:00 am Entertainment— 909 Sports Grill will have large screen TVs mounted throughout the dining_ and bar areas. In addifion,—there will be 12' x 9' stage live bands and karaoke entertainment. Music will range from soloists up to 5 piece bands and genre will vary from jazz to blues to country to Top 40 sounds and DJ. ® Employee Information- All 909 Sports Grill managers, bartenders and servers will complete the CA Dept. of Alcoholic Beverage Control's L.E.A.D Training program within 30 days of being hired. Estimated employees on-site: 8 to 10 per shift not including security guards. Security Personnel- 909 Sports Grill will employ 2 licensed security guards anytime that live music is featured. Dress Code- A dress code will be strictly enforced whenever live music is featured. The dress code will be posted in a conspicuous place neat the front door. The dress code will read as follows: • No Gana • No Cuts & Colors • No hats • No holes in pants • Dress Shoes and collared shirts required for me. XHIBIT E ItemG,H12 909 SPORTS LOUNGE 11849 E. Foothill Blvd, Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, CA Statement of Operations March 6,2015 1) Is the site suitable and adequate for the proposed use? The building was previously used another restaurant that served alcohol under a CFUP and the proposed use will continue to be a restaurant use. The building is located in a major shopping center with only commercial property surrounding it and other restaurants nearby. 2) Would the proposed use and design have a substantial adverse effect on traffic circulation and on the planned capacity of the street system? No. This use conforms to the previous use and the shopping center. ----3) Would the proposed-use have a substantial-adverse impact on the general welfare of persons residing in the community? No. This business will be located within a major shopping center with only commercial properties surrounding it. This use will offer unique style of dining not presently offered in Temecula. 4) Is this design of the project compatible with the existing and proposed development within the district and its surrounds? Yes. The shopping center has other restaurants in it and was clearly designed to be large lifestyle shopping center. Item G,H 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lyclu 13 . 0 69) 909 Pub & Grill SEP 2 5 20113 • 11849 E. Foothill Blvd., Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, CA . RECEIVED - PLANNING SECURITY PROCEDURES The purpose of security personnel, is to provide a safe environment in the Restaurant. Our top priority is to famish our security personnel with the appropriate knowledge to handle any situation that may arise in the course of employment.The tools provided here are based on principles expertly designed to provide a safe environment for our staff, patrons, and property. Use o Regardless of the number of security staff,all contact with our patrons should follow the basic guidelines of the Use of Force Matrix. This Matrix is broken into 5 steps: I. Apparent Force This Force is created by the visual sense of authority our staff projects. It is our staffs appearance, attitude, demeanor and body posture. These elements should be professional and create a.sense.of.authority__to.all patrons observing-us;-_— This enables the patrons to know who is an employee and that when the employee approaches them,they should pay heed to any instructions or requests. This level of force is not achieved by intimidation, but rather by courteous professionalism. II. Constructive Force This Force is the result of the spoken word; what our staff says to our patrons. This level should continue the line of professionalism and helpfulness. Profanity used towards the patron expressly forbidden. The goal here is to give the patron the impression that our siaff is here to help. We know that as long as the patron feels our staff is trying to help them, they will continue to let our staff try. The moment the patron feels intimidated, insulted or offended,then they become defensive and our staff s job of gaining compliance is greatly hampered. III. Physical Force This Force is where our staff would place their hands on our patrons to restrain and or remove them from our venue. This force is only authorized when a patron presents an unquestionably unsafe element to our environment or other patrons. We do not create a fight; we prevent them. All holds will be implemented with the intent of restraining rather than inflicting pain. No pain compliant holds should be utilized. Choke holds or any holds around the neck are not authorized. Whenever feasible, two employees should approach the unruly patron and work as a team. Though individual holds may be necessary, it is always better to have two employees restrain/remove a patron. IV. Defensive Force This Force provides for an employee to defend himself against a physical attack. There are three options our employee has if he or she is attacked: 1) Push • away from the patron and create distance while calling for assistance. 2) Immediately EXHIBIT F Page 1 of 6 Item G,H 14 1 grab the attacker and restrain them with the least amount of force necessary. 3) As a last resort, strike the patron to stun them and immediately grab the attacker to restrain them. Continued strikes,be either fist or feet,without regard to restraint,will constitute excessive force for which we, the venue and our employee may be held civilly and/or criminally responsible. V. Deadly Force This Force is to be used only if a patron expresses the intent to kill or cause grievous bodily injury to another,has a weapon(either personal such as fist or feet or mechanical such as a knife or gun),and has the capability to carry out the threat. In situations where deadly force is real,our staff is instructed to immediately call 9-1-1 and remove all potential victims from the attacker. It is not recommended that our staff attempt to disarm the attacker,but instead to safeguard other patrons and employees. This Matrix serves as a constant reference tool for security. Our staffs reactions are required to be congruent to the incident in displaying the appro bate level of _ response. Any physical contact should be based on the least amount of force necessary to accomplish the objective of restraint. Pain compliant holds and choke holds are expressly forbidden. A quick rule of thumb is to respond to non-physical incidents in a non-physical manner and to respond to physical incidents in a physical manner,using the least amount of physical response as is necessary to ensure everyone's safety. However,there are those times when a non-physical incident may result in a physical response. At times like those,our security has been trained to utilize a technique referred to as C.R.O.C. which is outlined below: Command Ask or tell the patron to do or stop doing something-This is to be done in a stern,but pleasant manner.(e.g. Good Evening,sir. My name is Shane; I'm security here at the bar. I'm going to need you to put your shirt back on while inside the bar. Thank you very much.). Reasons Why you need the patron to do or stop doing something, if they do not comply with your command-Unruly patrons may respond to our request if given a reason why we require their compliance.(e.g. I know it's hot in here and you don't want to put your shirt on sir,but it's a house policy that guys must wear shirts while in the bar. So, if you could just put your shirt back on, I'd appreciate it.Thanks.). • Options Explain what options the patron has and the potential outcomes of those options-People do not want to be forced to do anything,but if given options,a patron is likely to comply. (e.g.OK,sir. I understand you don't want to put your shirt back on, but that really only leaves us two options:One,you put the shirt back on and stay inside the bar and continue to have a good time,or Two,if you choose to keep the shirt off, I'm going to have to ask you to leave and I really don't want you to Page 2 of 6 Item G,H15 go. I'm glad you're here. So why don't you just put the shirt on and stay in the Restaurant? Thanks.). • Confirmation—Again, we understand that people want to be treated with respect and want their opinions heard.Ask patron if they have any suggestions to amicably rectify this issue(e.g. Sir is there anything I can do to get you to put your shirt on so you can stay in the bar?) If the patron refuses to comply with the laws of the city of Rancho Cucamonga and the state of California OR to follow the house policy established to maintain a safe environment and security has used C.R.O.C.,then security is now authorized to use minimal physical force to remove the patron from our venue. Hands-on is still, always,a last resort Incident Report Writin All staff needs to provide a thorough account of any incident. Examples of when reports should be completed are fights,injury,medical or law enforcement involvement, severely intoxicated patrons, and any crimes(e.g.Larceny_—n a patron, refusing to pay for services,destruction of property). These reports must include the date and time of the incident,names of the employees involved, • participants and any witnesses. The reports of all staff need to be clear and chronologically organized so that the reader can get a clear picture of not only the incident,but the response to the incident. These reports are required to be completed by the end of the employee's shift and faxed to the insurance provider by close of that business day. Firearms/Weapons At no time are employees allowed to carry and guns,knives, other weapons,or chemical agents. This prohibition includes flashlights that are larger than 2 AA batteries. Uniform The uniform consists of a colored shirt that reads"Regulator"in a solid script not less than 2"so that patrons can easily identify who is in charge.The uniform must be worn at all times while our security personnel are on the clock. The uniform must be tucked in and pressed so that their appearance is professional. Door Policy No patron will be served alcohol without providing a valid form of identification when requested. We comply with suggested guidelines of the California Alcohol Beverage Control Commission which states that establishments granted liquor • licenses are only to accept"bona fide"identification which is defined as ID that is Page 3 of 6 Is bVtatsOTE C FAgf ? Item G,H 16 currently valid and issued by a governmental agency.Valid forms of identification include: a state driver's license with photo, a military ID, a Passport, or a state-issued identification card with photo.In accordance with California law,we do not accept foreign ID. Each ID will be checked at the door before the patron is allowed to enter the establishment, and should be checked again at the bar if the server feels a patron may be underage. We follow the California guidelines which suggest carding anyone who looks under 30. Any employee who is responsible for checking identification is required to adequately handle the identification. They must read the ID and feel for raised pictures or fraying laminate on the card. The card must also be inspected to ensure the person presenting the card looks like the person on the ID, and that the ID is not expired. Simply looking at an ID for the birth date is not an adequate ID check. If there is any question as to the authenticity of the ID,we may ask the patron - -- questions about-the card such as what is your address,what is your astrological sign, what day were you born,etc.. Anytime we suspect an ID is a fake we will deny entry to a patron. Also, a patron will be reftised entry into the restaurant if they are visibly intoxicated or otherwise impaired before they enter the restaurant. Basic Security Rales I. Force will only be used when it is necessary to ensure the safety of the venue, other employees, or patrons. All use of force should be aimed at restraining the patron,not for fighting or hurting them. No hand-strikes are to be used unless an employee or patron is faced with serious physical injury or deadly force. 2. Security employees must not leave their post unless they are relieved by another employee. 3. Cell phones are not to be used when the security employee is at their post. 4. Security employees are not allowed to consume alcohol or use drugs during their shift. 5. Security employees are responsible for keeping their area of the Restaurant clean from spills and debris which could cause injury to another person. 6. If two combatants from a fight are separated,they are to be ejected through separate doors. The combatants should also be ejected at different times(i.e. eject the most aggressive combatant and wait 10 minutes to eject the other combatant). Always treat patrons with respect and courtesy. Use phrases like"please"and"thank you"often. Be stem but patient Page 4 of 6 C}►41� �R 17 A t%410 CATE 07 P Item G,H17 California ABC - Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Pa-e 1 of' 1 �19, , 0 • C9�of Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs 1 Popular Links (L.E.A.D) Press Releases Application I Selection&Forms To view the 2013 LEAD Training Schedule click here Industry Advisories What is the LEAD Program? License Types/FeesLicense Query System The LEAD'rogram is a free voluntary cre✓ention and education program for retail licensees Licensing Reports their employees anc acioncarts i;began on January'.'991 vi,;h a grant from:he California Public Records Requests Office of Traffic Safety Server Awareness(LEAD)Training Since February 199=.the Deran^,en;of Alroho!ic 9everagc Ccn:ro has fundoc the program. License Application,Protest and Disciplinary Since 199' the LEAD P-oara r t•.as.ra r.ed over 10u OOC.peop e Processes 1.he,curriculum is des.gnoo for licenses.managers anc cmotcyces 'F here;s no separate Annual Reports ma nagemer.:cumculum Program length,s 3-1:12 hours exceot fr=airs'Spec,a!Events 'ra!ninc :vh!cn is 2 hours 'art:cipatior:is iim!tec to 50 persons per clan=_ More on training... Prevention /Education Programs LEAD'S M15510n Responsible Beverage Service(RBS)Training Provider Program the mission of tnc:.LAC)F-ogram is to prc•vide high quality effective ano educationally sound Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs(LEAD) training or.alcohol responsibility and the law to California retail!icensecSand their employees: --- Program.(ABC's award winning-server-awareness. training program for licensees) he Department of •.:coholic Feverage C^nmo;expcc:s and encc•uraoes 1!censees to act Informed Merchants Preventing AlcohoFRetated responsibly relative to trio r alcohol:--beveracc license pnv,:eges Crimes and Tendencies(IMPACT) i he LEAD Proctrarr Prov des the licensee aro app:cant✓n:h practical in'ormat:or.on serving Retail Operating Standards Task Force(ROSTF) alcoholic beverages safer, responsibly.anc;--sally and preventing ill!c:t dr,1c activity at thin • censed establishment Alcohol Issues Partnership Project with CA University Systems Statements of Support The Governor's Prevention Advisory Council's Underage Drinking Prevention Workgroup 'On behalf of the%care of U!rroaor.<.and=r;:and=_is:-:7mittve of the^Jar,Onai root;-;!scion Acainst Drunk Drvirg it:s my pleasure:0 confirT tnat the Califoirie Department of A!cohoiic =—e erage Controi nas been seiected to recei✓e our Erevents.Annual Education and Frevenwn uvart Amcr-:g a f:elC of very strong contenders.yn,1r submission.of tnc Protect was deemed the test exampic-of!nit outs:arding wor6.being cone across the c;untry to r•ci::e;he incidence o'drunk anc itnoarec drivirc" crra,nce rJ Scnia'✓c'•n: vresiden. N iona'Commiss;or;Aga r-5'1:rung:C,niinc. September 29. '995 VVe ate fortunate m have a procram like I.: .D tc assts:us in prom0;inc coopora:icr.bet:.cen Hcenseas an'ia:✓enforcome.nt.. " James�osr.Chief o,Po;icc- Campbe?!?Ofce 13cparimenr "he Lc .-D=rograr:is an acsolute!y fa^tactic Pro Ora^ -3.,eta ler;Can`.!ell rcu rot, invaluable::is to nave these continuous training programs fe-our r;anagcmen;anc stay Hy eaucaiir:c--ur management and staff.vc---an ooeratn cur business in a tru;y pmfes„onai manner" J.'11 Ka'✓a ag'n Ka.ra^F.C--, 'iv •• _..,j ech:nre!SOFr.:, Site'!ap • F>::.::�:.,.':<:; i r;;•;,.1�•;; ,. ::'lis.:. Lc:vi�j s,:l�;:r Er.:::i;!;c EXHIBIT G Item G,H 18 ams/lead.html 11151-20 1 nine - 0 - nine sports grill 1234 foothill blvd rancho cucamonga, c . a . 91786 open daily- weekdays 11 : 00 am brunch - lunch - dinner - late Night ® 909-123-4567 small plates house made potato chips $5- soaked in beer, fresh herbs, served w/ malt vinegar aioii devil's on horseback $7 - blue cheese stuffed dates wrapped in apple wood smoked bacon grilled artichoke $8- wood fired artichoke w/ myer lemon aioli sizzling garlic shrimp $10- white prawns with garlic, chili, lemon, parsley, gril_ed sourdough bread. cheese fondue pot $8- gruyerertina cheese `ampagne. served with bread, pink lady apple wedges, vegai ai hard salam build your own guacamole $7 house made mozzarella sticks $ p osciutto and zz relia wrapped in spring roil and topped with-panko_..bread -c_ -------- .._. ... -. _.....__. .- ._.__.. _ ..._......................---- ahi poke $10 - Kauai style ahi o e with sushi ri e honey -sriracha glazed buffalo i gs $10 - twist n he classic buffalo wings. if you like extra spicy ask for sr' NCFa dressing. roasted eggplant dip w/ spiced pita crisp $8 charcuterie plate $10 - assorted sa � i, pateaison, use pickle, artisan bread prosciutto wrapped melon - portobello fries $8- ligh y battere. `�portobelwq mushro *� served w/garlic aioii v,. I lamb chop lollipops $10- h1 ney worcest4arshire e=egano rinade, grilled smashed potatoes. r` 909 fried quesadilla $e- crisp tortilla filled with meat, peppers, onion., and cheese soup/salad daily house soup - -n.-house, farm-fresh ingredients. ask server for details french onion $6 - caramelized onion stock, spanish sherry, gruyere and provolone, sourdough crouton. caesar - $8 baby romaine, parsley, parmesan reagiano, tossed in our House Made caesar dressing. add grilled natural chicken breast or shrimp $4 heirloom tomato salad SIO - Ineirloom tomatoes, watermelon, burrata, aru-ula, balsamic, and micro basil • beet salad $8 - candy striped beets, goat cheese, arugula , shallot chan.pagne vinaigrette farmers market $3- asparagus, artichoke, avocado, mint, corn, manche , ao champagne � vinaigrette EXHIBIT Item G,H19 between bread the 909 burger $9 - pickled red onion, tallegio, wild rocket, house made ketchup, rosemary bun, garlic fries short rib tacos $8 - slow braised short ribs, pickled red onions, cotija cheese, salsa borracho pork belly sliders $8 - pickled carrots, cucumber, sesame aicli and cilantro w/ slow roasted pork belly b&b sliders $8 - caramelized onions, blue cheese & nueske bacon. bbq pulled chicken or pork sliders $8 - our spicy house made bbq sauce tossed with your choice of meat, pickle, ranch brick oven fl.atbread fresh mozzarella-../---parmigianino -reggiano.--/.-.ricotta._./_-..arugula_$.9... . house sliced peppe i fresh mozz lla micro basil $10 roasted ro to / fresh b it urrata $9 prosciutto de parma r sted garlic resh egg / garden herbs, ricotta s r cream / whi ffle oil $11 roasted crimini mush s /sauteed lee white truffle oil, pa i ianino reggiano $ 2 Spanish choriz sausage / sal / house made spicy toms o.. sauce / house c 'a se blend /today' flatbread as �.. ates asian style braise short r``, s $24- to der sh t ribs, asparagus, jasmine" ice house chicken $14 - `free ra ge jidori chicken, , garden fresh herbs, garlic, coked under a brick fish & chips $14 - Newcastle beer battered cod, caper remoulade, malt vinegar pan seared wild sockeye salmon $22- organic succotash, roasted red pepper colis bbq baby back ribs $21 - slowM?Dribs, garlic smashed Draft Beers Bud Light/Newcastle/ Stella/ Deadlift IPA ® Shock Top / 312 Goose Island Honkers Goose Island Bottled Beers Budweiser/ Bud Light/ Budweiser Black Crown Coors Light/Miller Lite/Michelob Ultra Negra Modelo/ Corona/Corona Light/ Dos XX Fat Tire/New Belgium 1554 Heineken/ Heineken Light/Blue Moon/ Amstel Ligh Arrogant Bastard/Sam Adams/Sam Summer Ale Stone Pale Ale/ Stone IPA/Levitation/Ruination Guinness/Blue Moon/Chimay Blue/Sierra Nevada Ace Pear Cider/Ace Berry Cider/Ace Apple Cider Coors N/A Red Wine House Cabernet 7/21 Smith & Hook Cabernet 12/45 Apothic (Blend) 8.5/32 Gnarly Head NTerlot - 909 Red Sangria 8 White Wine'/Champagne House Chardonnay 7/21 Hess Select Chardonnay 10/40 Francias Coopola 10/40 Stellina di Norte Pinot Grigio 8/30 909 White Sangria 8 Korbel Split 8 Chandon Half Bottle $25 Champagne Drinks Bellini: Champagne&Mathilde Peach Liqueur Hibiscus: Champagne w/Cranberry Juice Mimosa: Champagne &OJ Kir Royale: Chambord &Champagne The Ghost: Melon Liqueur&Champagne La Rosette: St. Germaine&Champagne PLEASE DON'T DRINK AND DRIVE • Item G,H21 Shots 7 Birthday Cake Vanilla Vodka and Hazelnut Liqueur Served with a sugar rimmed lemon wedge Washington Apple Crown Royal,DeKuyper Apple Pucker and Cranberry Juice Kool Aid Vodka,DeKuyper Melon,Amaretto and Cranberry Juice Pear Kamikaze Absolut Pear,Triple Sec,and fresh Lime Juice White Gummy Bear Bacardi Raz,Peach Schnapps,fresh Lime Juice,and a splash of Sprite Grape Gumdrop Vodka,Grape Schnapps,and a splash of Sprite Pineapple Upside Cake Vanilla Vodka,Pineapple Juice,and Grenadine Cherry Lifesaver Amaretto,Southern Comfort,and Cranberry Juice Sexy Alligator Layered Melon&Pineapple,Chambord,and topped with Jagermeister Ask Your Favorite Bartender to make you their Favorite Shot!!!! Bomb Shots $0 Jager Bomb/ Blasters Jagermeister and Red Bull Energy Drink Skinny Bomb Chilled Vodka and Sugar Free Red Bull Raspberry Bomb Raspberry Vodka and Red Bull Energy Drink Cherry Bomb Cherry Flavored Vodka and Red Bull Tuaca Bomb Shot of Chilled Tuaca and Red Bull Sunkist Orange Flavored Vodka,Orange Soda,and a Splash of OJ Irish Car Bomb Shot of Jameson and Irish Cream with Guinness Orange Tic.Tac Orange Flavored Vodka and Red Bull Energy Drink Grape Escape Three Olives Grape and Red Bull Energy Drink Shoot The Root Root Beer Schnapps and light beer Southern Comfort,Watermelon Schnapps and Red Bull Virginia Vag Red Bull and Cranberry Juice with Gin,Stoli Blueberry, Black Raspberry Liqueur Item G,H22 Cocktails Hawaiian Malibu Rum,splash of Blue Curacao,Pineapple juice,and topped with Myers Rum-$9 909 Surfer Malibu Rum,Amaretto,Pineapple Juice and Cranberry juice garnished with an Orange-$8 White Gummy Bear Bacardi Raz,Peach Schnapps,fresh Lime juice&Sprite-$7 Adult Sweet Tea Seagram's Sweet Tea flavored Vodka mixed with Lemonade- $8 909 Mango Margarita Tres Sietes Tequila mixed with our Mango Margarita mix and topped with Patron Citronage-$8 Rum Runner Malibu Coconut Rum,House Rum,mixed with Orange Juice,and Pineapple juice and topped with Myers and a splash of 151 Bacardi Rum-$10 Berry Press Ciroc Red Berry,Club Soda,and a splash of Sprite-$8 • Naughty School Girl Pear Vodka,X-Rated,Pineapple juice,Cranberry Juice and Sprite$8 Adult Lemonade Citrus Vodka, Muddled Lemons,Lemonade$8 Slap Yo Mama Margarita Jose Traditional Muddled w/Fresh Oranges and Jalapenos,Agave,Sweet&Sour,topped with Patron Citronage. (Spicy) $8 Peach Jamboree Ciroc Peach,Orange juice, Sauvignon Blanc,Soda$8 rancho Drama Queen Berry Rum,Cherry Rum,Muddled with Fruit,Cranberry, Orange Juice,and Sweet&Sour$8 Dark&Stormy Kracken Spiced Rum and Ginger Beer$8 Root Beer Float • 3 Olives Root Beer Vodka,with Whipped Cream Vodka, Topped w/Coca Cola 8 Item G H23 List of Tenants in Masi Plaza 02/18/15 • Tenant Address Sq.Ft Type of Use Business Hours Jack in the Box 11767 Foothill Blvd. 2,761 Restaurant Po a es Chicken and Biscuit Restaurant 11815 Foothill Blvd.Suite A 2,085 Restaurant H&L Finest Inc.dba Manila Sunset 11815 Foothill Blvd.Suite B 1,938 Restaurant Bobalicious Tea House 11815 Foothill Blvd.Suite C 1,584 iuice bar 11815 Foothill Blvd.Suite D 2,1I1 vacant Taco Hut 11815 Foothill Blvd.Suite E 2,903 Restaurant Gen Rancho Cucamonga LP 11837 Foothill Blvd.Suite A 8,794 Restaurant Wabi Sabi favanese Restaurant 11837 Foothill Blvd.Suite B 4,450 Restaurant Gard's Music LLC 11837 Foothill Blvd.Suite C 726 retail Deny 's Restaurant 11899 Foothill Blvd. 5,377 Restaurant 11897 Foothill Blvd.Suite A 2,596 vacant Pho Noodle &Grill 11897 Foothill Blvd.Suite B 1,973 Restaurant 3 Davis&M.Ramirez 11897 Foothill Blvd.Suite C 1,074 barber shop 11897 Foothill Blvd.Suite D 2,441 vacant 24 Hour Fitness Center 11787 Foothill Blvd. 41,175 G ym Legends Nails 11819 Foothill Blvd.Suite A 1,385 Nail Shop 11819 Foothill Blvd.Suite B L,674 vacant Yan Jiang Muller(Foot Massae 11819 Foothill Blvd.Suite C 1,040 Foot massage NutritionForLess -. .. ..... .... ............ ..... ..-11819-Foothill Bhnf:Suite D The Bra Lad _...1,214 -retad - 11819 Foothill Blvd.Suite E 1,694 retail Designer Suit Outlet 11819 Foothill Blvd.Suite F 2,419 retail 11819 Foothill Blvd.Suite G 1537 vacant 11819 Foothill Blvd.Suite H 115011 vacant 11819 Foothill Blvd.Suite I 1,677 vacant 909 Sports Grill Inc. 11849 Foothill Blvd.Suite A 5,204 Restaurant 11849 Foothill Blvd.Suite A 2,037 vacant 11849 Foothill Blvd.Suite B 2,078 vacant ViRoger Dui Golf 11849 Foothill Blvd.Suite C 6,200 retail Vista Paint 11849 Foothill Blvd.Suite D 5,199 retail Engrave N Embroider Things 8188 Rochester Ave.Suite A 3,011 rets 8188 Rochester Ave.Suite B 1,736 vacant 8188 Rochester Ave.Suite C 5,023 vacant MGoodyear Vapourur 8188 Rochester Ave.Suite D 2,366 retail uto Service Center 8122 Masi Dr. 2,853 auto repair shop 8140 Masi Dr. 5,410 auto repair shop Quali Auto Services 8160 Masi Dr.Suite A 3,381 auto repair shop 8160 Masi Dr.Suite B 4,758 vacant Lim's Honda,Mazda,Acura 8180 Masi Dr.Suite A 2,784 auto repair shop Lim's Honda,Mazda,Acura 8180 Masi Dr.Suite B Discount Auto R air Center -2.211 auto repair shop 8220 Masi Dr.Suite A 3,752 auto repair shop Discount Auto Repair Center 8220 Masi Dr.Suite B Smog Stop auto r air sho , smog 8220 Masi Dr.Suite C 1082 shop Brent Smith Masi Dr.Suite D 2,685 auto repair-shop Eurotech 8200 Masi Dr.Suite A 2,921 auto repair shop Robert Tint Shop8200 Masi Dr.Saute B 1,611 auto repair shop All Star Auto 8200 Masi Dr.Suite C 3,716 auto repair shop • Total 8190 Masi Dr. 5,658 vacant 171,802 _XHIBIT I Item G,H24 SOB • S P Q R T S G R I L L City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: CUP NO. DRC2011-00673 To Whom It May Concern: I. Leon Fregoso, owner of 909 Sports Grill, have leased the space located at 11849 Foothill Blvd. #A. Rancho Cucamonga and will comply with the previous CUP No. DRC2011-00673 in its entirety. I recognize the need to obtain an Entertainment permit before any live entertainment is to be conducted. Should you need further information, please contact Melinda at 909-231-9274. • Respectfully,., CEO EXHIBIT J 11849 Foothill Blvd; #A Rancho Cuc#ecmggH231917')0 909 SPORTS LOUNGE 11849 E. Foothill Blvd, Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, CA Statement of Operations March 6, 2015 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Cup No. DRC2011-00673 To Whom It May Concern: 1, Leon Fregoso, owner of 909 Sports Lounge, have lease the_space location.at 1._1849_ Foothill Blvd, #A, Rancho Cucamonga and will comply with the previous CUP No. DRC2011- 00673 in it's entirely. I recognize the need to obtain an Entertainment permit before any live entertainment DJ is to be conducted. Should you need information, please contact Sue Hernandez at 909-243-6122. Respectfully, Leon Fregoso, CEO Item G,H26 Ifi STAFF REPORT Planning Department RANCHO DATE: September 27, 2011 C;UCAMONGA TO: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director FROM: Lawrence J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: NON-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00673-GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, INC-A request to re-establish a restaurant and bar within a 5,000 square foot unit located at Masi Plaza in the Industrial Park District(Subarea 7) at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A. APN: 229-011-47. Related File: Public, Convenience or Necessity DRC2011-00880.This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Commercial center—Community Commercial District,Terra Vista Community Plan South - Epicenter Sports Complex—General Industrial Subarea 8 East - Single-family home and retail/office center—General Commercial West - Partially developed commercial center— Industrial Park Subarea 7 B. General Plan Designations: Project Site- General Commercial North - General Commercial South - Park East - General Commercial West - General Commercial C. Site Characteristics: Ghomri Restaurant Group, Inc. for Tropica Restaurant and Bar is proposing a restaurant and bar within Building 13 in the Masi Plaza commercial development, located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A. The Conditional Use Permit application includes a restaurant with a bar. Unit A is approximately 5,000 square feet and is located within a 267,500 square foot mixed use center with retail, auto service, multi-tenant commercial and industrial uses. EXHIBIT K. Item B Item G,H27 r.- PLANNING DIRECTOR STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00673—GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 2 D. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Food Uses (15%) 22,500 5/1000 112.5 113 Food Uses 7,360 10/1000 73.6 74 (Exceeds 15%) Fitness Center 42,000 6.6/1000 277.2 278 Retail/Service/Office 81,340 5/1000 406.5 412 - _ .--- Tofals ...... --_ _ - 153;200 � -' 869.8-'-- 877'* * This square footage total is only for the area between Foothill Boulevard and Sebastian Way and east of Masi Drive. x� ** This parking space total is only for the lots between Foothill Boulevard and Sebastian Way and east of Masi Drive. ANALYSIS: A. Background: Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00785 was previously approved for this location for the sale of distilled spirits in conjunction with a restaurant with a bar.The hours of operation for that approval were from 10:00 a.m.to 12:00 a.m.,7 days a week with extended hours until 1:00 a.m. Wednesday through Saturday. The tenant was requested to submit a new Conditional Use Permit application due to a change in business hours and the previous operator had ceased business for more than 180 days. The business license for Bellissimo Pizza and Pasta was closed in early 2009. B. General: The applicant, Ghomri Restaurant Group, LLC for Tropica Restaurant and Bar has applied for a Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 in order to operate a restaurant with bar to sell distilled spirits for on site consumption within Masi Plaza at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A, in the Industrial Park District Subarea 7. The floor plan of the restaurant will remain virtually the same as the previous restaurant as will the hours of operation. The applicant is proposing the operating hours to be Monday through Thursday 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and Friday through Sunday 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. 7� i B Item G,H28 to, PLANNING DIRECTOR STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00673—GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 3 C. Land Use Compatibility: The property is in the Masi Plaza commercial center within Industrial Park (IP) Subarea 7, which allows for a variety of retail, personal and professional services, including sit-down restaurants with the service of distilled spirits. As such, the Tropica Restaurant and Bar will be a compatible land use consistent with other restaurant uses in the center. A restaurant with bar use was previously approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00785 and conducted business until early 2009 within this unit. No entertainment is proposed for this site and the hours of operation are consistent with the center.The Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) agency was contacted and the area is over saturated with Type 47 (On-Sale General for Bona Fide Public Eating Place License); accordingly a Public Convenience or Necessity application (DRC2011-00880) has been filed for review and consideration. D. Parking: The site currently contains 877 total parking spaces. With the current tenants and vacant spaces being calculated as retail, there is a surplus of 7 parking spaces. The surplus has been calculated using the parking requirement for shopping centers under 600,000 square feet but more than 25,000 square feet of leasable area (Section 17.12.040-B-1-b(1). This Section of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code allows for the parking requirement to be 5 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of.gross leasable space. Section 17.12.040-B-14(3)(a) of the Development Code states that 15 percent of the gross leasable area can be food services and may utilize the requirement of 5 spaces for each 1,000 square feet, but any food service uses over the 15 percent will be required to utilize the 1 space for every 100 square feet of leasable area: E. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301,which covers the operation and minor alteration of an existing facility.The project entails the operation of a restaurant with bar within a 5,000 square foot unit within a multi-tenant building. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment since the building was intended to be used as a retail-type use and the proposed restaurant's operational characteristics will create the same or less of an environmental impact as retail use. The Planning Director has reviewed the Planning Department staffs determination of exemption, and based on his own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper,the property was posted,and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff has not received any letters or phone calls expressing concern over the Conditional Use Permit. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 to allow a 5,000 square foot restaurant with a bar to sell distilled sprits within an existing building through the adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions. B Item G,H29 i -3J PLANNING DIRECTOR STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00673—GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 4 Respectfully submitt d, Ja Troyer, AICP Pla er Director JT/SF/vv Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Plan Exhibit B - Floor Plan .Exhibit C - Site parking calculations Exhibit D - Business Plan Letter Draft Resolution of Approval for Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit e ' B Ifem G,H30 STAFF REPORT = _ J PL-INNING DEPARTMENT v DATE: November 13, 2013RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C;UCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563 - STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL INC.: A request to provide live entertainment comprised of karaoke, live bands, and dancing within an existing restaurant of about 5,300 square feet in the Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD), located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit & APN: 0229-012-22. Related file: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 — Existing Facilities. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563_through theadoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. -- BACKGROUND: The subject location has been the site of two previous restaurants with bars. The first, Bellissimo Pizza and Pasta, was granted the approval to operate under Conditional Use Permit • DRC2002-00785 on October 22, 2002. Following the closing of that restaurant in 2009, the entitlement to operate expired. Tropica Restaurant and Bar was granted a new approval to operate under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 on September 27, 2011 (Exhibit K). The business license for that restaurant expired on November 27, 2012 and, as a result, was presumed to be closed. The tenant space was verified as vacant during an inspection by the Business License Department on April 18, 2013. 909 Sports Grill, Inc. (dba 909 Pub & Grill) is currently operating a restaurant with a bar at the subject location under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673. Per Section 17.14.090(D) of the Development Code, all permits and entitlements expire when a business is closed for more than one calendar year. Their business license to operate the restaurant with the bar was approved within this one-year timeframe in August 2013 following receipt of confirmation that they will comply with the conditions of approval of the existing Conditional Use Permit (Exhibit J) and described in Resolution No. 11-18 (Exhibit L). As entertainment is proposed in conjunction with this restaurant and bar, in accordance with Section 17.20.020 of the Development Code and Condition of Approval #8 of the above-noted Resolution, an'Entertainment Permit application for review and action by the City was submitted on July 8, 2013. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Site - Commercial/Office Complex — Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) North - Commercial Center — Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista Community Plan South - Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex — General Industrial (GI) District Item G,H31 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563-STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. November 13, 2013 Page 2 East - Legal, Non-Conforming Residence and Commercial/Office Complex — Industrial Park (IP) District and General Commercial (GC) District West - Varies (commercial, industrial, and vacant property) — Industrial Park (IP) District B. General Plan Designations: Site - General Commercial North - General Commercial South - Parks East - General Commercial West - Industrial Park C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a tenant space located within Masi Plaza, a commercial/office complex of about 1,030,000 square feet (23.6 acres) that is about 1,250 feet (east to west) by about 915 feet (north to south) located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue (Exhibit B). The commercial complex is divided by two minor streets, Masi Drive and Sebastian Way, into two (2) parts. The larger, 15-acre part is generally rectangular in shape and is bound by Foothill Boulevard to the north and _-_ ..._.__..__Rochester_Avenue.to-the..east-with-the-.minor-streets on_the.west_and_south,_-respectively._ On the opposite side of these minor streets is the remaining, 'L'-shaped, 8.6-acre part. The complex is comprised of numerous buildings with a combined floor area of about 267,500 square feet. The specific location of the project site is one of the in-line tenant spaces at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A, in the largest building that is situated in the center of the complex (Exhibit C). The largest tenant within this building is 24 Hour Fitness. Other tenants within this building include Roger Dunn Golf and Vista Paint. The other buildings are single- tenant pad buildings or multi-tenant buildings situated along the above-noted streets (Exhibit 1). The buildings along Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue are occupied by restaurants such as Denny's, Wabi Sabi, and Jack in the Box. The buildings along Masi Drive and Sebastian Way are occupied by automotive repair shops and commercial offices. To the north of the subject commercial/office complex is a commercial center that includes Home Depot, The Spaghetti Factory, and ARCO. To the east is a legal, non-conforming residence and a commercial/office complex. To the south is the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex operated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. To the west is a vacant property, an industrial building, and Carrow's Restaurant. The commercial/office complex is zoned Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD). The properties to the west is zoned Industrial Park (IP) District while the properties to the south are zoned General Industrial (GI) District. The properties to the east are zoned Industrial Park (IP) District and General Commercial (GC) District. D. Parking Calculations: The parking requirements for the restaurant and bar, and parking availability within the commercial complex, were analyzed during the review of Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673. At that time, it was concluded that there was a sufficient amount of parking for the restaurant and the other tenants within the complex. As this Entertainment Permit request does not include an increase in the floor area of the restaurant, the results of the previous analysis still apply and no new parking calculation is necessary. For reference, the parking calculations from the Staff Report for the Planning Director public hearing on September 27, 2011 are as follows: Item G,H32 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563 -STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. • November 13, 2013 Page 3 Type Floor Parking # of Spaces #of Spaces of Use Area (SF) Ratio Required Provided Food Uses (<15%) 22,500 5/1000 112.5 113 Food Uses 7,360 1/100 73.6 74 (>15%) Fitness Center 42,000 6.6/1000 277.2 278 Retail/Service/ 81,340 5/1000 406.5 412 Office Totals 153,200' 869.8 8772 .._'.This total floor area calculation is only.-for the.area of the.commercial.complex.between.Foothill._ . Boulevard and Sebastian Way and east of Masi Drive. 2 This total parking stall calculation is only for the area of the commercial complex between Foothill Boulevard and Sebastian Way and east of Masi Drive. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant, on behalf of 909 Sports Grill, Inc., proposes to provide entertainment consisting of live music, dancing, and karaoke to complement their restaurant and bar. The televisions will be mounted throughout the dining and bar area. The live music will range from solo musicians to five-piece bands who will perform on a stage of 108 square feet near the bar area. Dancing will be in an area of about 84 square feet immediately in front of the stage — the two (2) tables located there will be moved to make room during the hours when there is entertainment. Karaoke also will be performed on this stage when there are no live music performances (Exhibit E). The floor plan that was originally approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 was revised to meet the current applicant's business plan but is substantially similar. The principal dining area is located near the front of the restaurant while the bar and associated seating/service areas are located in the middle of the restaurant. An office, the kitchen, and restrooms comprise the remainder of the restaurant's floor area (Exhibit D). With the exception of the addition of the stage, the floor plan of the restaurant will not be altered by the addition of entertainment. Furthermore, the restaurant will serve a full menu of items, i.e. the menu includes a variety of food that is typical of a full-service restaurant (Exhibit H). B. Number of Emplovees and Hours of Operation/Activity: The applicant states that there will be eight (8) to (10) employees per shift. This number does not include the security guards. The operating hours of the restaurant and bar are currently between 11:00am and 12:00am (midnight) Monday through Thursday, and between 11:00am and 1:00am Friday through Sunday. This is consistent with the hours of operation that were approved under the original Item G,H33 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563- STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. November 13, 2013 Page 4 Conditional Use Permit. The hours when live entertainment will be provided are proposed to be between 8:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. (midnight) on Thursday, between 8:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday, and between 11:00 a.m, and 1:00 a.m. on Sunday (Exhibit E). C. Security Procedures: The applicant will have two (2) licensed security guards on the premises when live music is performed. One of these security guards will be posted outside the restaurant to monitor activity in the parking lot and general vicinity. The applicant submitted a document to the City that describes their operations and outlines the restaurant's proposed security procedures. The documents describe the procedures for the use of force, incident report writing, firearms/weapons, and uniforms for security staff, door policy, and security rules (Exhibit F). Staff forwarded this document to the Police Department for their review. The Police Department accepted the procedures as submitted with the condition that each security guard's uniform have the word "Security" on it instead of the word "Regulator" as proposed by the applicant. This revision has been incorporated as a condition of approval in the Resolution of Approval. The applicant has indicated that all managers, bartenders, and servers will complete the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program offered by the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control within 30 days of being hired -..-.-.(Exhibit E and-_G).. D. Land Use Compatibility: The use will be consistent with the site's development district and the surrounding land uses. The restaurant is within a commercial complex that is comprised of a variety of commercial tenants including retailers, personal services, and restaurants. There are no sensitive land uses in the vicinity of the restaurant. The entertainment activity will be conducted indoors. The restaurant will be required to operate in compliance with the performance standards that are described in Section 17.66 of the Development Code, including noise limits which are described in Section 17.66.050(G). The hours of operation are consistent with operating hours of the commercial center. If operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, the Entertainment Permit can be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. E. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities - which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project is for entertainment consisting of large screen televisions, live music, dancing, and karaoke at an existing restaurant and bar; no expansion or significant change to the existing tenant space is proposed. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. Item G,H34 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563- STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. ® November 13, 2013 Page 5 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received. Respectfully submitted, Candyce Bur tt Planning Manager CB:MS/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - Floor plan -.Exhibit-E.--.-Business Descri.Ption-__.-___ Exhibit F - Security Procedures Exhibit G - Brief Description of Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program (from ABC website) • Exhibit H - Restaurant/Bar Menu Exhibit I - Tenant List (within the 15-acre part of the commercial center only) Exhibit J - Letter Confirming Compliance with Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 Exhibit K - Staff Report for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 (September 27, 2011) Exhibit L - Resolution No. 11-18 for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 (September 27, 2011) Draft Resolution of Approval for Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563 Item G,H35 RESOLUTION NO.11-18 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. DRC2011-00673, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A BAR FOR ON-SITE CONSUMPTION OF DISTILLED SPIRITS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT LOCATED IN A LEASED SPACE OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET WITHIN BUILDING 13 OF MASI PLAZA, IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT SUBAREA 7, LOCATED AT 11849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, UNIT A - AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 229-011-47. A. Recitals. 1. The applicant, Ghomri Restaurant Group, LLC.for Tropica Restaurant and Bar,filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No.DRC2011-00673,as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as"the application." 2. On the 27th day of September 2011, the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Director hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Director during.the above-referenced public hearing on September 27, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Director hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, with a street frontage of 933 feet along Foothill Boulevard, and lot depth of approximately 691 feet, and is presently improved with a mixed use center including restaurants with bars serving distilled spirits; and b. The property to the north of the subject site across Foothill Boulevard is developed with a commercial center;the property to the south is the Epicenter Sports Complex;the property to the east contains a single-family residence and a retail/office complex; and the property to the west is partially developed with a commercial center; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of use proposed. The site is located in a single-story, multi-tenant commercial building in which this tenant space was previously approved for a similar type use; and d. The applicant proposes the sale of alcoholic beverageson-site within a sit down restaurant requiring a Type 47 Liquor License issued f by the California State Department of Alcoholic Beverages Control (ABC); EXHIBIT Item G,H36 `:r:�' PLANNING DIRECTOR RESV� TION NO. 11-18 . DRC2011-00673—GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 2 e. The applicant proposes the sale and on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages at a restaurant that serves lunch and dinner seven days a week. The bar area will be located in the middle of the restaurant and will be open to the rest of the restaurant. The applicant does not propose offering any entertainment or dancing; and f. The hours of operation will be Monday through Thursday from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00a.m.; Friday through Sunday from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m.; and g. Staff does not anticipate that the sale of distilled spirits will have a detrimental effect on the surrounding property owners as long as the business is appropriately managed and is in conformance with the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control regulations. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Director during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Director hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of - Development Code, and-the purposes of the-disthct-in whi&tfie site is Ideated as it is a commercial use that provides choice and competition for merchants and residence; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity since the use is compatible with surrounding land uses; and C. The application,which contemplates operation of the proposed use,complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code as it requires a Conditional Use Permit to serve distilled spirits for on-site consumption with a meal and this application satisfies that requirement. 4. The Planning Director hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Director hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planning Department: 1) Approval is hereby granted for the sale and service of distilled spirits in conjunction with a full-service restaurant use located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A. The restaurant use shall be a"bona fide eating place" as defined in California Business and Professions Code Section 23038. 2) Approval shall expire, if the permits are not issued or the approved use has not commenced, within 5 years of this date. Item G,H37 QLTION PLANNING DIRECTOR RESNO. 11-18 -/ DRC2011-00673—GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 3 • 3) Approval of this application is contingent on the approval of the Public Convenience or Necessity application DRC2011-00880 by City Council. 4) Any modification or any intensification of the use beyond what is specifically approved by Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 and the Conditions of Approval shall require review and approval by the Planning Director. Revisions to the hours of operation, request to operate an ABC license other than a Type 47, change in operation of the activities/operations as stated in this Resolution of Approval and Conditions of Approval are subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director. 5) The 5,000 square foot restaurant shall not be enlarged or intensified without Planning Director review and approval. The restaurant shall operate and be maintained in accordance with the Floor Plan as shown in the Staff Report for DRC2011-00673, Exhibit B, and as attached to this.Resolution as Attachment A, and hereby-referenced--in. the-- Conditions of Approval. 6) The sale and service of alcoholic beverages shall occur only when food • items are served at the restaurant and shall cease when full listed menu items are not available to the customers. 7) The serving of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to Monday through Thursday from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m.; Friday through Sunday 11:00a.m.to 1:00 a.m. Changes to the closing hours of the restaurant shall not occur prior to review and approval of the Planning Director. 8) This permit does not allow live music or staged entertainment. Entertainment activities as defined by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 5.12 shall require the applicant to obtain a separate Entertainment Permit approval from the Planning Commission. 9) Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall be contingent upon the applicant's ability to secure approval of a Type 47 Liquor License issued by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for this location. 10) The restaurant shall adhere to all food service requirements and operation regulations for a Type 47 Liquor License as prescribed by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). Failure to abide by all applicable ABC regulations or all Conditions of Approval shall result in Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 being brought before the Planning Director for review. Item G,H38 PLANNING DIRECTOR RES816TION NO. 11-18 ORC2011-00673–GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 4 11) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any regulations as set forth in the Uniform Building Code and/or City Ordinances or by the San Bernardino County Health Department and/or California State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). 12) If the approved operation of the business creates law enforcement and/or fire safety problems, such as but not limited to, loitering and disturbances, noise, overcrowding, intoxication at the premises, blocked fire exits, etc., the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Director for consideration of modification and/or revocation. 13) The facility shall be operated in conformance with all applicable performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels. 14) Any signs proposed for the restaurant shall be designed in conformance-with.-the-City's-Sign-Ordinance-and--the-.Uniform--Sign — --- Program for the complex and shall require review and approval by the Planning Director prior to installation. 15) The facility shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Industrial Area Specific Plan including,but not limited to, noise levels. If the operation of the business causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses,the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Director for consideration and possible termination of the use. 16) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City,its agents,officers,or employees,because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City,its agents,officers,or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees, which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition. Building and Safety Any alterations to the restaurant will require a building permit and the following standard conditions apply: TENANT IMPROVEMENTS STANDARD CONDITIONS NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW (S). A) General Requirements for Tenant Improvements: Item G,H39 a' TION rPLANNING DIRECTOR RESNO. 11-18 '`✓✓✓ DRC2011-00673—GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 5 1) Submit five complete sets of plans including (if applicable): a) Site/Plot Plan; b) Foundation Plan; C) Floor Plan; d) Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e) Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) f) Plumbing and Sewer Plans, g) Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC201 1- 00673) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2) Submit two sets of structural calculations and energy conseryation calculations. (if applicable) 3) Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4) Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Department. 5) Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 6) Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter). 7) Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for fire-resistive construction. 8) Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations and mix occupancy ratios. 9) Provide documentation and calculation for compliance with the California Energy Standard regulations. 10) Provide draft stops in combustible attics and concealed spaces, in accordance with CBC. ® 11) Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. Item G,H40 PLANNING DIRECTOR RES TION NO. 11-18 QT DRC2011-00673—GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 6 Fire Construction Services Fire Standard Conditions 1) Any restaurant alteration must be permitted by the Building Department. It is the responsibility of the owner to contact the health and building departments to obtain all the required permits and inspection. 2) Changes in the cook line must be submitted for review by the Fire Department. The fire suppression alterations require a permit. 3) The restaurant shall not open for business until obtaining an Assembly Use Permit from the Fire Department. 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2011. BY: Jam ' R. Troyer, Planning Director ATTEST: Valerie Victorino, Planning Department Secretary I, Valerie Victorino, Secretary to the Planning Department, for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Director held on the 27th day of September 2011. Item G,H41 • e � I M36�EN 11 S.F ' `SSN DINING ( 250 S.F. CORRIDOR CORK. 58 S.F. 120 S.F. CL ELEC. 40 S.F i 60 S.F. i t STOR. i DINING CORA. 3 120 S.F. 70 S.F. i� i PREP i I COOLER t 60• ° BAR j e 224 F. ggpp I ° 0tIN6 t 220�$.F. DINING 22 393.S.F, m +11' t KITCHEN Q 1210 S.F. / MP RAMP 6 CORA ^' EXIT PATH'OF TRAVEL ® in m!/--- 0INING 110 S.F. COGR.6 I % RECEPTION ' 422 S.F. __.— II 36' I v — i DINING DINING 345 S.F. i 398 S.F. i i LAj- ttach ment A 44'-7' Item G,H42 • RESOLUTION NO. 13-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563, A REQUEST TO PROVIDE LIVE ENTERTAINMENT COMPRISED OF KARAOKE, LIVE BANDS, AND DANCING WITHIN AN EXISTING RESTAURANT OF ABOUT 5,300 SQUARE FEET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK(IP)DISTRICT, INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT (ICOD), LOCATED AT 11849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD,UNIT A;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0229-012-22. A. Recitals. 1. On May 21,1986,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No.290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. 2. Steve Rawlings, on behalf of 909 Sports Bar&Grill, Inc.,dba 909 Pub&Grill,filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolutibn,-the subjecf Entertainment Permitrequest'is referred to as "the application." 3. On the 131' day of November, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho • Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 13,2013 including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a tenant space located within Masi Plaza,a commercial complex of about 1,030,000 square feet(23.6 acres)that is about 1,250 feet(east to west)by about 915 feet (north to south) located at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue; and b. The complex is divided by two minor streets, Masi Drive and Sebastian Way, into two (2) parts. The larger, 15-acre part is generally rectangular in shape and is bound by Foothill Boulevard to the north and Rochester Avenue to the east, with the minor streets on the west and south, respectively; and • EXHIBIT M Item G,H43 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-53 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563-STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL INC. November 13,2013 Page 2 c. The complex is comprised of numerous buildings with a combined floor area of about 267,500 square feet. The specific location of the project site is one of the in-line tenant spaces at 11849 Foothill Boulevard,Unit A,in the largest building that is situated in the center of the complex; and d. To the north of the subject commercial/office complex is a commercial center. To __ .... .... _.. the east is a legally,non-confQrmjog.residence and a comm arciallofficecomplex.-T.o-Owsouth-ia..._._.._. ...._...._. the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex operated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. To the west there is a vacant property, an Industrial building, and a restaurant;and e. The commerciaMce complex is zoned Industrial Park (IP) District, industrial Commercial Overlay District(ICOD). The properties to the west Is zoned industrial Park(IP)District while the properties to the south are zoned General Industrial(GI) DIWct The properties to the east are zoned Industrial Park(IP)District and General Commercial(GC)District;and f. Tropica Restaurant and Barwas granted the approval to operate under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00873 on September 27, 2011. The business license for that restaurant expired on November 27,2012 and,as a result,was presumed to be closed. The tenant space was verified as vacant during an Inspection by the Business License Department on April 18,2013. 909 Sports Grill, Inc. (dba 909 Pub & Grill) Is currently operating a restaurant with a bar under this Conditional Use Permk. Per the Development Code, all permits and entitlements expire when a business is closed for more than one calendar year. Their business license to operate the restaurant with the bar was approved within this one-part,i teh mein August 2013 following receipt of confirmation that they will comply with the conditions of approval of the existing Conditional Use Permit and described in Resolution No. 11-18;and g. The applicant,on behalf of 909 Sports Grill,Inc.,proposes to provide entertainment consisting of large screen televisions, live music, dancing, and karaoke to complement their restaurant and bar. The televisions will be mounted throughout the dining and bar area. The live music will range from solo musicians to five-piece bands who will perform on a stage of 108 square feet near the bar area. Dancing will be in an area of about 84 square feet immediately in front of the stage-the two(2)tables located there will be moved to make room during the hours when there is entertainment Karaoke also will be performed on this stage when there are no live music performances;and h. The floor plan that was originally approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00873 was revised to meet the current applicants business plan but is substantially similar. The principal dining area is located near the front of the restaurant while'the bar and associated seating/service areas are located in the middle of the restaurant. An office,the kitchen, and restrooms comprise the remainder of the restaurants floor area. With the exception of the addition of the stage, the floor plan of the restaurant will not be altered by the addition of entertainment; and L The restaurant will serve a full menu of items, i.e.the menu includes a variety of food that is typical of a full-service restaurart and Item G,H44 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-53 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563-STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL INC. November 13, 2013 Page 3 j. There will be eight(8)to(10)employees per shift. This number does not include the security guards;and k. The operating hours of the restaurant and bar are currently between 11:00am and 12:00 a.m. (midnight) Monday through Thursday, and between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. Friday through Sunday. This Is consistent with the hours of operation that were approved under the _...origingt.CondItIonaI Use'Permit.' The hours when live ante in enter be provided are proposad-to_. ..,_._._.. _....._.._ be between 8:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. (midnight) on Thursday, between 8:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday, and between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m.on Sunday; and I. There will be two(2) licensed security guards on the premises when live music is performed. One of these security guards will be posted outside the restaurant to monitor activity in the parking lot and general vicinity. The applicant submitted a security plan that describes the procedures for the use of force, incident report writing, firearrnstweapons, and the uniforms for security staff, door policy, and security rules. The Police Department_reviewed this plan and enaraIl- acce ted th- - �-� - - -�-------- - . ...._.._. 9 Y p - -e procedures as submitted subject to revisions; and m. The applicant has indicated that all managers, bartenders, and servers will complete the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs(LEAD)Program offered by the California • Department of Alcohol Beverage Control within 30 days of being hired. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above,this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application is consistent to the public health,safety, morals or welfare; and b. The premises or establishment is likely to be operated in an legal,proper or orderly manner; and c. Granting the application would not create a public nuisance;and d. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of any surrounding residential neighborhood; and e. The applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities-which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project is for entertainment consisting of large screen televisions, live music, dancing, and karaoke at an existing restaurant and bar, no expansion or significant change to the Item G,H45 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-53 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563-STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL., INC. November 13,2013 Page 4 existing tenant space is proposed.Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption,and based on its own independent judgment,concurs in the stairs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2,3,and 4 above,this Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the standard conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: _. _ ..__...... -- ._.... a _... ...- - - _......... .__._. . - - -—- . .... ..._ -....__ _.................__.._. .__... _ 1) Approval is for live entertainment comprised of karaoke,live bands and dancing within an existing restaurant of about 5,300 square feet in the Industrial Park (lP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD), located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A;APN: 0229-012- 22. The-modifications-to-the-site-and-interior-ofthe-building shalt be as shown on the plans received by the City on September 25,2013 and as shown in the Floor Plan as Exhibit D in the Staff Report for DRC2013- 00563,dated November 13,2013,and as attached to this Resolution as Attachment A, and hereby referenced in the Conditions of Approval. Any revisions shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Manager and/or Planning Commission. 3) Any modification or intensification of the use such as a revision to the days and hours of entertainment,any improvements such as expansion of the stage and/or dance floor,and/or other modifications/Intensification beyond what is spw flcally approved by this Entertainment Permit shall require the review and approval by the Planning Manager and/or Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a Business License. 4) The days and hours of operation for the entertainment shall be limited to between 8:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. (midnight) on Thursday, between 8:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday,and between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. on Sunday. 5) Entertainment shall be limited to karsoke, live bands, and dancing. 6) Adult entertainment, as defined in Section 17.128.020 of the Development Code, is not permitted. 7) All entertainment activity shall be conducted inside the building. 8) While entertainment is being conducted all doors and windows shall remain closed for noise attenuation purposes. Item G,H46 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-53 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563-STEVE RAWUNGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. • November 13, 2013 Page 5 9) The business operations shall be in compliance with the performance standards that are described in Section 17.66 of the Development Code, including noise limits which are described in Section 17.66.050(G). 10) The business operations shall be in compliance with the regulations and requirements of the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control that apply to Type 47 Liquor Licenses. _..._.:_...._.__.. _.. .__._._.._....._11)---A ge/entertainment-area Mast-b -#rom-lifem entrance to the restaurant and not from a separate exterior entrance. Other exits shall be used for emergency purposes only. 12) If operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences,businesses,or operations including,but not limited to noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension o�revocation of the permit. 13) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 14) The applicant shall submit an annual renewal statement and fee,due on or before January 1 of each and every year per Section 17.20.20(G)of the Development Code. 15) All conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2013-00673 shall apply. 16) All signs shall comply with Chapter 17.74(Sign Regulations for Private Property) of the Development Code and Uniform Sign Program#125. 17) Applicant must use an identity card scanner(ID Scanner) anytime the premises is selling alcoholic beverages and has entertainment. (Definition of ID Scanner. An 1D Scanner automates and documents the age verification process by scanning the ID through a card reader). The ID Scanner should record and timestamp the name, identification number,and date of birth on the identity card provided by patrons.This information should be recorded and maintained for a minimum of thirty (30) days. The business will provide the ID Scanner records to law enforcement upon request. 18) Any patron who (1) fights or challenges another person to fight, (2) maliciously and willfully disturbs another person by loud or unreasoned noise,or(3)uses offensive words which are inherently likely to provoke ® an immediate violent reaction shall be removed from the premises. Item G,H47 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-53 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563—STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. November 13,2013 Page 6 19) An incident log shall be maintained at the licensed premises on a continual basis with at least one year of entries and be readily available for inspection by a police officer. The log is for recording any physical altercations, injuries, and objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance occurring in, on, or at the licensed premises, including the immediately adjacent area that is owned, leased, or rented by the licensee. The log will indicate date,time, description of incident, and action taken. "Objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance' means disturbance of the peace,public drunkenness,drinking in public, .... .. __ ,--g ,—prostitution-loiterincrpnbtic---..,_.......__.. _.... ...-- -- urination,lewd conduct,drug trafficking,or excessive loud noise. 20) Security guards shall maintain order and enforce the establishment's no loitering policy and shall take"reasonable steps"(as that term is defined in subparagraph (3) of Section 24200 of the California Business and Professions Code)to correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance. 21) There shall be no flashing lights, disco lights, or similar lighting during the hours of entertainment that prevents the ability to clearly distinguish and identify patrons, security personnel, or other individuals in the restaurant in order to ensure the safety of patrons. Police Department 1) A minimum of eight(8) surveillance cameras shall be installed in the premises as follows:two(2)at the bar area(one on each end);two(2) in the primary dining areas;two(2)at the VIP bottle service areas;one (1) at the front door, and one(1)at the stage. 2) The video recordings shall be of nothing less than NTSC 4SIF with a minimum of 704X480 resolution. A minimum of 30 days surveillance video shall be kept. 3) The uniform of the security guards shall have the word"Security'dearly visible on it. 4) All managers, bartenders, and servers shall complete the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program offered by the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control within 30 days of being hired. Fire District/Building&Safety Department 1) Any proposed floor plan,seating,occupancy and/or furnishing changes must be submitted to Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District for review and approval. Do not increase the approved occupant load. Item G,H48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-53 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563-STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. • November 13,2013 Page 7 S. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rances Howdyshbil, Chairman ATTEST: al-- -- ___ CandYcQuMeT Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the_Planning Commission of the....City.of.Rancho Cucamonga,-do- hereby ceifify-that the foregoing Resolution lams duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of November by the following vote-to-wit: • AYES: COMMISSIONERS: PLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Item G,H49 OSH'E) wall i ® d bi+l ® .._ • u °8 Q „ gel o � p DIldiNG fl!mi 9 00 all III P i a g ® a� 011 o • _ >; ' ro � OO 000 all ! 909 SPORTS BAR&GRILL 909 SPORTS BAR&GRILL �w 3 MO E FOMLL eLw.,uvrrA gymm wwCHO crxrumwaa CA 91M Floor Plan t. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT APPLICANT: STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL INC. LOCATION: 11849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, UNiT A-APN: 0229-012-22. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS-APPLY TO YOUR-PROJECT. - APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • A. General Requirements completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, _j_/_ its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, oflibers, or employees, for any Court costs and attomeft fees which the City, its agents, offloers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 13-50 or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be Included on the plans (fuU size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption-$50 X 1 Item G,H51 Project No. DRC2013-00563 Completion Dana B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not / commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved pians which Include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. .. .__...Prior to,,any use of the orolect slt"r-business ctlilty being-commenced-thePec�aN---=-�_-/- ----- Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Califomia Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy, 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance -Oode�an-othecorn liancewthali r _i _sectons._of_the_Development-- r app ca aCi , an - - -/_ applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 5. All building numbers and Individual units shall be Identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and In conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD)Standards. D. SHOPPING CENTERS 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 2. The entire site shalt be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 3. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." 4. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards I I_ which shall be Incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level-All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 d8 during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m.until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing,or other handling of boxes,crates,containers, building materials,garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 2 Item G,H52 • RESOLUTION NO. 15-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-00278, A REQUEST TO PROVIDE LIVE ENTERTAINMENT COMPRISED OF KARAOKE, LIVE BANDS, DANCING, A DJ AND STAND-UP COMEDY WITHIN AN EXISTING RESTAURANT OF ABOUT 5,300 SQUARE FEET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK(IP) DISTRICT, WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT (ICOD), LOCATED AT 11849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, UNIT A; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0229-012-22. A. Recitals. 1. Leon Fregoso, on behalf of 909 Sports Lounge, filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit DRC2015-00278 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of May, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed"public hearing cri-the applicatibn-and concluded-said"hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution.are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on May 27, 2015 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows.- a. ollows:a. The application applies to a tenant space located within Masi Plaza, a commercial complex of about 1,030,000 square feet(23.6 acres)that is about 1,250 feet(east to west) by about 915 feet (north to south) located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue; and b. The complex is divided by two minor streets, Masi Drive and Sebastian Way, into two (2) parts. The larger, 15-acre part is generally rectangular in shape and is bound by Foothill Boulevard to the north and Rochester Avenue to the east, with the minor streets on the west and south, respectively; and C. The complex is comprised of numerous buildings with a combined floor area of about 267,500 square feet. The specific location of the project site is one of the in-line tenant • spaces at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A, in the largest building that is situated in the center of the complex; and Item G,H53 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-40 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-00278-LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 2 d. To the north of the subject commercial/office complex is a commercial center. To the east is a legally, non-conforming residence and a commercial/office complex. To the south is the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex operated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. To the west there is a vacant property, an industrial building, and a restaurant; and e. The commercial/office complex is zoned Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD). The properties to the west are zoned Industrial Park (IP) District while the properties to the south are zoned General Industrial (GI) District. The properties to the east are zoned Industrial Park (IP) District and General Commercial (GC) District; and f. The subject location has been the site of two previous restaurants with bars. The first, Bellissimo Pizza and Pasta,was granted the approval to operate under Conditional Use Permit. DRC2002-00785 on October 22, 2002. Following the closing of that restaurant in 2009, the entitlement to operate expired. The second restaurant, Tropica Restaurant and Bar was granted a new approval to operate under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 on September 27, 2011. The business license for-Tropica Restaurant and Bar expired on November-27,-2012-and the tenant space was verified as vacant during an inspection by the Business License Department on April 18, 2013. In August of 2013, 909 Pub and Grill opened for business operating as a restaurant with a bar under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673. Per Section 17.14.090 (D) of the Development Code, all permits and entitlements expire when a business is closed for more than one calendar year. 909 Sports Lounge business license to operate the restaurant with the bar was approved within this one-year timeframe in August 2013 following receipt of confirmation that 909 Sports Lounge would comply with the conditions of approval for the existing Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 and described in Resolution No. 11-18; and g. The applicant, on behalf of 909 Sports Lounge, proposes to provide additional live entertainment. Currently the live entertainment consists of large screen televisions, live music, dancing, and karaoke to complement the restaurant and bar. The televisions are mounted throughout the dining and bar area. The live music ranges from solo musicians to five-piece bands who perform on a stage of 108 square feet near the bar area. Dancing is in an area of about 84 square feet immediately in front of the stage-the two (2) tables located there are moved to make room during the hours when there is entertainment. Karaoke also is performed on this stage when there are no live music performances. The proposed live entertainment consists of a DJ and stand- up comedy; and h. The floor plan that was originally approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 was revised to meet the current applicant's business plan but is substantially similar. The principal dining area is located near the front of the restaurant while the bar and associated seating/service, dance floor and stage areas are located in the middle of the restaurant. An office, the kitchen, and restrooms comprise the remainder of the restaurant's floor area. The floor plan of the restaurant will not be altered by the modification of additional live entertainment; and i. The restaurant serves a full menu of items, i.e.the menu includes a variety of food that is typical of a full-service restaurant; and j. There are eight(8)to (10)employees per shift. This number does not include the security guards; and Item G,H54 ® PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-40 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-00278—LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 3 k. The operating hours of the restaurant and bar are currently between 11:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m. (midnight) Monday through Thursday and between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. Friday through Sunday. The hours of operation that include live entertainment are currently between 8:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. on Thursday, between 8:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday, and between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. on Sunday. I. The proposed hours of operation are between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m. Monday through Sunday and the proposed hours of live entertainment are between 11:00 a.m.and 2:00 a.m. on Sundays and 8:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Thursday through Saturday; and m. There are two (2) licensed security guards on the premises when live music is performed. One of these security guards is posted outside of the restaurant to monitor activity in the parking lot and general vicinity. The applicant received approval of a security plan that describes the procedures for the use of force, incident report writing, firearms/weapons, and the uniforms for security staff; tuIot-.­TFie San Bernadino County Sheriffs Department reviewed this plan and the security plan was approved under Entertainment Permit DRC2013- 00563; and • n. The San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department has reviewed the application and does not object to the expansion of live entertainment. The San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department informed staff that since Deputies conducted their site visit in March of 2014, 909 Sports Lounge has had calls for service but the amount of calls has not been excessive and the calls were minor in nature. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department has no new conditions of approval and the conditions of approval described within Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 (Resolution 11-18)and Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563(Resolution 13-53)still apply and are listed in both draft resolutions; and o. The applicant has indicated that all managers, bartenders, and servers will complete the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program offered by the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control within 30 days of being hired. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application is consistent to the public health, safety, morals or welfare. The applicant provided a Security Plan with the original entitlement and conditions were imposed to ensure the proper service of alcohol and that the building complies with all applicable Fire and Building Codes; and b. The premises or establishment is likely to be operated in a legal, proper or orderly manner. The applicant submitted a Business Plan with the originally approved applications (EP • DRC2013-00563 and CUP DRC2011-00673)that included a Security Plan,which was reviewed and accepted by the San Bernardino County Sherriffs Department.The San Bernardino County Sherriff s Department has observed the business and has found the business to be operating in a good manner and in conformance with the approved security plan; and Item G,H55 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-40 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-00278- LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 4 C. Granting the application would not create a public nuisance. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department has informed staff that in the last year there have been few calls for service to this location and the calls were minor in nature. The San Bernardino County Sherriff's Department does not object to this permit; and d. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of any surrounding residential neighborhood since the location is surrounded by similar commercial uses, there are no sensitive uses in the immediate area and the conditions of approval will ensure that the business is operated in a manner that will not adversely impact the public safety or welfare; and e. The applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. Staff has reviewed the submitted documents and found them to be accurate. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. -The project qualifies under-as-a Ctass-1-exemption-under-State-C EQA--Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities - which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project is to extend the hours of operation; no expansion or significant change to the existing tenant space is proposed. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,this Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the standard conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Planning Department 1) Approval is for live entertainment comprised of karaoke, live bands, dancing, a DJ and stand-up comedy within an existing restaurant of about 5,300 square feet in the Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD), located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A; APN: 0229-012-22. 2) The site and interior of the building shall be consistent with the plans received by the City on March 12, 2015 and as shown in the Floor Plan as Exhibit D in the Staff Report for DRC2013-00563, dated November 13, 2013, and as attached to Resolution 13-53 as Attachment A, and hereby referenced in the Conditions of Approval. Any revisions shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission. 3) Any modification or intensification of the use such as a revision to the days and hours of entertainment, any improvements such as expansion Item G,H56 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-40 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-00278-LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 • Page 5 of the stage and/or dance floor,and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Entertainment Permit shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a Business License. 4) Entertainment shall be limited to karaoke, live bands, dancing,a DJ and stand-up comedy. Any revisions shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission. 5) Adult entertainment, as defined in Section 17.128.020 of the Development Code, is not permitted. 6) All entertainment activity shall be conducted'inside the building. 7) While entertainment is being conducted all doors and windows shall remain closed for--noise attenuation purposes: 8) The business operations shall be in compliance with the performance standards that are described in Section 17.66 of the Development • Code, including noise limits which are described in Section 17.66.050(G). 9) The business operations shall be in compliance with the regulations and requirements of the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control that apply to Type 47 Liquor Licenses. 10) Access to the lounge/entertainment area must be from the main entrance to the restaurant and not from a separate exterior entrance. Other exits shall be used for emergency purposes only. 11) If operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. 12) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 13) The applicant shall submit an annual renewal statement and fee, due on or before January 1 of each and every year per Section 1,7.20.20(G) of • the Development Code. 14) All conditions of approval for Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00673 shall apply. Item G,H57 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-40 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-00278—LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 6 15) All signs shall comply with Chapter 17.74 (Sign Regulations for Private Property) of the Development Code and Uniform Sign Program#125. 16) Applicant must use an identity card scanner (ID Scanner) anytime the premises is selling alcoholic beverages and has entertainment. (Definition of ID Scanner: An ID Scanner automates and documents the age verification process by scanning the ID through a card reader). The ID Scanner should record and timestamp the name, identification number, and date of birth on the identity card provided by patrons. This information should be recorded and maintained for a minimum of thirty (30) days. The business will provide the ID Scanner records to law enforcement upon request. 17) Any patron who (1) fights or challenges another person to fight, (2) maliciously and willfully disturbs another person by loud or unreasoned noise, or(3) uses offensive words which are inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction shall be removed from the premises_ 18) An incident log shall be maintained at the licensed premises on a continual basis with at least one year of entries and be readily available for inspection by a police officer. The log is for recording any physical altercations, injuries, and objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance occurring in, on, or at the licensed premises, including the immediately adjacent area that is owned, leased, or rented by the licensee. The log will indicate date, time, description of incident, and action taken. "Objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance" means disturbance of the peace, public drunkenness,drinking in public, harassment of passersby, gambling, prostitution, loitering, public urination, lewd conduct, drug trafficking, or excessive loud noise. 19) Security guards shall maintain order and enforce the establishment's no loitering policy and shall take"reasonable steps"(as that term is defined in subparagraph (3) of Section 24200 of the California Business and Professions Code) to correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance. 20) There shall be no flashing lights, disco lights, or similar lighting during the hours of entertainment that prevents the ability to clearly distinguish and identify patrons, security personnel, or other individuals in the restaurant in order to ensure the safety of patrons. Police Department 1) A minimum of eight (8) surveillance cameras shall be installed in the premises as follows: two (2) at the bar area (one on each end); two (2) in the primary dining areas; two (2) at the VIP bottle service areas; one (1) at the front door; and one (1) at the stage. Item G,H58 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-40 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-00278-LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 • Page 7 2) The video recordings shall be of nothing less than NTSC 4SIF with a minimum of 704X480 resolution. A minimum of 30 days surveillance video shall be kept. 3) The uniform of the security guards shall have the word "Security"clearly visible on it. 4) All managers, bartenders, and servers shall complete the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program offered by the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control within 30 days of being hired. Fire District/Building & Safety Department 1) Any proposed floor plan, seating, occupancy and/or furnishing changes must be submitted to Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District for review.and.approval._. Do not increase.the approved occupant-load. . . __.. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY 2015 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: • ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item G,H59 RESOLUTION NO. 15-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00279, A REQUEST TO EXTEND THE HOURS OF OPERATION OF AN EXISTING RESTAURANT OF ABOUT 5,300 SQUARE FEET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DISTRICT, INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT (ICOD), LOCATED AT 11849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, UNIT A;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0229-012-22. A. Recitals. 1. Leon Fregoso, on behalf of 909 Sports Lounge, filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00279 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of May, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on May 27, 2015 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a tenant space located within Masi Plaza, a commercial complex of about 1,030,000 square feet(23.6 acres)that is about 1,250 feet(east to west)by about 915 feet (north to south) located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue; and b. The complex is divided by two minor streets, Masi Drive and Sebastian Way, into two (2) parts. The larger, 15-acre part is generally rectangular in shape and is bound by Foothill Boulevard to the north and Rochester Avenue to the east, with the minor streets on the west and south, respectively; and C. The complex is comprised of numerous buildings with a combined floor area of about 267,500 square feet. The specific location of the project site is one of the in-line tenant spaces at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A, in the largest building that is situated in the center of the • complex; and d. To the north of the subject commercial/office complex is a commercial center. To the east is a legally, non-conforming residence and a commercial/office complex. To the south is Item G,H60 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-41 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00279—LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 2 the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex operated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. To the west there is a vacant property, an industrial building, and a restaurant; and e. The commercial/office complex is zoned Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD). The properties to the west are zoned Industrial Park (IP) District while the properties to the south are zoned General Industrial (GI) District. The properties to the east are zoned Industrial Park (IP) District and General Commercial (GC) District; and f. The subject location has been the site of two previous restaurants with bars. The first, Bellissimo Pizza and Pasta,was granted the approval to operate under Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00785 on October 22, 2002. Following the closing of that restaurant in 2009, the entitlement to operate expired. The second restaurant, Tropica Restaurant and Bar was granted a new approval to operate under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 on September 27, 2011. The business license for Tropica Restaurant and Bar expired on November 27,2012 and the tenant space was verified as vacant during an inspection by the Business License Department on April 18, 2013.-In August of 201-3,-909 Pub-and Grill opened for business operating as-a-restaurant with a bar under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673. Per Section 17.14.090 (D) of the Development Code, all permits and entitlements expire when a business is closed for more than one calendar year. 909 Sports Lounge's business license to operate the restaurant with the bar was approved within this one-year timeframe in August 2013 following receipt of confirmation that 909 Sports Lounge would comply with the conditions of approval for the existing Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 and described in Resolution No. 11-18; and g. The floor plan that was originally approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 was revised to meet the current applicant's business plan but is substantially similar. The principal dining area is located near the front of the restaurant while the bar and associated seating/service and stage areas are located in the middle of the restaurant. Some seating is removed during entertainment hours in order to provide space for a dance floor next to the stage. An office, the kitchen, and restrooms comprise the remainder of the restaurant's floor area. The floor plan of the restaurant will not be altered by the modification of hours of operation; and h. The restaurant serves a full menu of items, i.e.the menu includes a variety of food that is typical of a full-service restaurant; and i. There are eight(8)to (10) employees per shift. This number does not include the security guards; and J. The operating hours of the restaurant and bar are currently between 11:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m. (midnight) Monday through Thursday and between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. Friday through Sunday. The hours of operation that include live entertainment are currently between 8:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. on Thursday, between 8:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday, and between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. on Sunday. k. The proposed hours of operation are between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m. Monday through Sunday and the proposed hours of live entertainment are between 11:00 a.m.and 2:00 a.m. on Sundays and 8:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Thursday through Saturday; and Item G,H61 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-41 • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00279—LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 3 I. There are two (2) licensed security guards on the premises when live music is performed. One of these security guards is posted outside of the restaurant to monitor activity in the parking lot and general vicinity. The applicant received approval of a security plan that describes the procedures for the use of force, incident report writing, firearms/weapons, and the uniforms for security staff, door policy, and security rules. The San Bernardino Sheriffs Department reviewed this plan and the security plan was approved under Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563; and m. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department has reviewed the application and does not object to the expansion of the hours of operation. The San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department informed staff that since Deputies conducted their site visit in March of 2014, 909 Sports Lounge has had calls for service but the amount of calls has not been excessive and the calls were minor in nature. The San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department has no new conditions of approval and the conditions of approval described within Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 (Resolution 11-18)and Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563(Resolution 13-53)still apply and are listed in both draft resolutions; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: • a. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning Code, Municipal Code,General Plan,and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations and standards. The Development code allows for this existing use as it is a commercial use that provides competition for like businesses and options for residents. Extending the hours of operation will not impact the applicability of any provisions; and b. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards.The business is an existing commercial use located in an existing commercial development and contains adequate site access, parking and utilities; and C. The granting of the permit will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity since the use is compatible with surrounding land uses and extending the hours of operation will not impact the like uses in the commercial development. Furthermore,the applicant submitted a Business Plan with the originally approved applications (EP DRC2013-00563 and CUP DRC2011-00673) that include a Security Plan, which was reviewed and accepted by the San Bernardino County Sherriffs Department. The San Bernardino County Sherriffs Department has observed the business and has found the business to be operating in a good manner and in conformance with the approved security plan.All uses during the hours of operation will be conducted within the building,which will,therefore, not impact parking, on-site circulation or surrounding land uses; and 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities - which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve Item G,H62 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-41 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00279-LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 4 negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project is to extend the hours of operation; no expansion or significant change to the existing tenant space is proposed. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,this Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the standard conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Planninq Department 1) Approval is for the modification of the hours of operation within an existing restaurant of about 5,300 square feet in the Industrial Park(IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District(ICOD),.located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A; APN: 0229-012-22. 2) - The site and interior-6f tlie building shail-be as consistent with the plans--- - received by the City on March 12, 2015 and as shown in the Floor Plan as Exhibit D in the Staff Report for DRC2013-00563, dated November 13, 2013, and as attached to Resolution 13-53 as Attachment A, and hereby referenced in the Conditions of Approval. Any revisions shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission. 3) Any modification or intensification of the use such as a revision to the days and hours of operation, and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit shall require the review and approval by the Planning Manager and/or Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a Business License. 4) The restaurant's hours of operation are limited to between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m. Sunday through Saturday.The hours of live entertainment shall be limited to between 8:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Thursday through Saturday, and between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m. on Sunday. Any revisions shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission. 5) Adult entertainment, as defined in Section 17.128.020 of the Development Code, is not permitted. 6) All entertainment activity shall be conducted inside the building. 7) While entertainment is being conducted all doors and windows shall remain closed for noise attenuation purposes. Item G,H63 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-41 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00279-LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 5 8) The business operations shall be in compliance with the performance standards that are described in Section 17.66 of the Development Code, including noise limits which are described in Section 17.66.050(G). 9) The business operations shall be in compliance with the regulations and .requirements of the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control that apply to Type 47 Liquor Licenses. 10) If operation of this Conditional Use Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. 11) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code,_or any other City Ordinances_ _. 12) All signs shall comply with Chapter 17.74 (Sign Regulations for Private Property) of the Development Code and Uniform Sign Program #125. 13) Security guards shall maintain order and enforce the establishment's no loitering policy and shall take"reasonable steps" (as that term is defined in subparagraph (3) of Section 24200 of the California Business and Professions Code) to correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance. 14) There shall be no flashing lights, disco lights, or similar lighting during the hours of entertainment that prevents the ability to clearly distinguish and identify patrons, security personnel, or other individuals in the restaurant in order to ensure the safety of patrons. 15) All conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 shall apply. Police Department 1) A minimum of eight (8) surveillance cameras shall be installed in the premises as follows: two (2) at the bar area (one on each end); two (2) in the primary dining areas; two (2) at the VIP bottle service areas; one (1) at the front door; and one (1) at the stage. 2) The video recordings shall be of nothing less than NTSC 4SIF with a minimum of 704X480 resolution. A minimum of 30 days surveillance ® video shall be kept. Item G,H64 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-41 CONDITIONAL USE.PERMIT DRC2015-00279—LEON FREGOSO FOR 909 SPORTS LOUNGE May 27, 2015 Page 6 3) The uniform of the security guards shall have the word"Security"clearly visible on it, 4) All managers, bartenders, and servers shall complete the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program offered by the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control within 30 days of being hired. Fire District/Building & Safety Department 1) Any proposed floor plan, seating, occupancy and/or furnishing changes must be submitted to Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District for review and approval. Do not increase the approved occupant load. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY 2015 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item G,H65 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT RANCHO UCAMONGA DATE: May 27, 2015 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048 — RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - A proposal to construct an industrial building of about 161,000 square feet on a parcel of about 322,000 square feet (7.4 acres) in the General Industrial (GI) District located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street; APN: 0209-411-36. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: • Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project; • • Adopt the Resolution approving Development Review DRC2014-01048 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Industrial Buildings; General Industrial (GI) District South - Office Complex; General Industrial (GI) District East - Logistics Building; General Industrial (GI) District West - Vacant; Industrial Park (IP) District B. General Plan Designations: Project Site— General Industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - Industrial Park C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a property with an area of about 322,000 square feet (7.4 acres) located between 6th and 7th Streets on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue (Exhibit A). The property is about 607 feet (east-west) by about 512 feet (north-south). The parcel is vacant and is dominated by short grasses. The project site is one of three parcels that resulted from the subdivision of a property of about 25 acres that was owned by Coca-Cola and partially developed with one of their bottling facilities. That subdivision was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on December 12, 2012 (Related file: Tentative Parcel ® Map SUBTPM19397). The project site is bound on the north by small industrial buildings and to the east by a logistics building with a floor area of about 175,000 square feet. To the south is an office complex. As noted previously, along the west side of the project site will be the future alignment of Utica Avenue which currently terminates near the northwest and southwest corners Item 1-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048— RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN May 27, 2015 Page 2 of the project site. To the west, on the opposite side of the future street, is another vacant parcel (one of the other parcels of the aforementioned subdivision). At the northwest corner of the project site is an easement of about 3,500 square feet in favor of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The zoning of the property and all properties to the north, east, and south is General Industrial (GI) District while the zoning of the property to the west is Industrial Park (IP) District. The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1,085 feet and 1,070 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant, on behalf of Oakmont Industrial Group, proposes to construct a logistics building of 160,980 square feet (Exhibit D). The building is speculative at this time. Typical for this type of building, there will be an office area located at the southwest corner of the building. The dock loading/storage area with 19 dock doors will be located on the south side of the building (Exhibit F). There will be two points of access via new driveways at the southwest and northwest corners of the project site. The building is required to have 90 passenger vehicle parking stalls; 91 parking stalls will be provided. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt-up construction painted with a palette of several colors. The building will have form-lined concrete accents. An additional primary material will be metal accents while a secondary material will be glass panels. Generous amounts of blue- tinted glass have been provided at the office area and at various locations along the wall planes of the building that are most visible. An interesting feature of the building will be the well- articulated wall planes at the office area. Another characteristic that will add interest is the horizontally articulated vertical elements that interrupt the massing of the primary wall planes. These vertical elements include glass panels. At various locations there are also horizontal metal accents that project from the wall plane. These accents punctuate the application of glass and provide shaded'relief. At all corners of the building, with the exception of the northeast corner, there are enhancements comprised of glass, variations in color, metal canopies, score lines, and relief in the wall plane that, altogether, reflect the general appearance of the office corner (Exhibit 1). As is typical for this type of project due to its operating characteristics and layout, landscaping will be generally concentrated along the street frontage of the project site. The average depth of landscape along the street will comply with the minimum 25 feet as specified in the Development Code. Along the north, south, and east sides of the project site the perimeter landscaping will be at least 5 feet in width with the exception of an area of about 120 feet in length (north-south) near the southeast corner of the building. At this location, the minimum width of the fire lane is 26 feet, as required by the Fire Department, and there are five (5) parallel parking stalls. The landscape strip, as proposed at this location, is only about 2 feet in width. Per Section 17.56.060 of the Development Code, a perimeter landscape strip of 5 feet is required. However, the Code does allow for 'breaks' in the strip for required access to the site. In this case, the required access is the fire lane. Staff notes to the Commission that the 'deficit' in its width would be offset by the landscape strip located between the north end of this set of parking stalls and the northeast corner of the project site (a distance of about 300 feet) that is 10 feet wide, i.e., twice the required width. Also, the aesthetic value of such a narrow strip of landscape would be negligible. For these reasons, Staff recommended to the Design Review Committee, during their review of the project on April 14, 2015, that the applicant be allowed to eliminate this narrow landscape strip altogether. The Design Review Committee accepted this recommendation. The landscape coverage is 10.8 percent - the minimum requirement is 10 percent for this Development District. Item 1-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048— RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ® May 27, 2015 Page 3 The design and layout of the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and the design guidelines of the General Industrial (GI) District. The massing and height of the proposed building is consistent with that of a logistics building and its design will be consistent with the character of its surrounding which is principally industrial in nature. It is not expected that the project as proposed will detrimentally affect the use and operations of neighboring, existing, or future developments nor create traffic or pedestrian hazards. Access to the existing CVWD facility will not be negatively affected — the project will actually improve it. Currently, access to it is accomplished by driving "off-road" for the short distance between the facility and the terminus of Utica Avenue (at the northwest corner of the project site). When Utica Avenue is completed with the project, access to the CVWD facility will be directly to the street via an existing gate and driveway. B. Floor Area Analysis: Per Chapter 2, Figure LU-2 Land Use Plan of the General Plan, the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) in the General Industrial (GI) land use category is 60 percent. As the proposed building will have a floor area of 160,980 square feet and the project site has an area of approximately 322,000 square feet, the calculated FAR for the project will be approximately 50 percent. C. Parking Calculations: Per Table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code, the parking calculations for the proposed project, based on the proposed mix of office and warehouse floor areas in the building, are as follows: • Type. of Use Floor Area Parking Number of Spaces (Square Feet Ratio Required Proposed Building (overall) 160,980 Warehousing 152,980 varies' 58 Office 8,000 1/250 32 Total Required/Total Provided 90/912 'For warehouse uses, the parking calculations are 1 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 20,000 square feet; 1 space per 2,000 square feet for the second 20,000 square feet; and 1 space per 4,000 square feet for additional floor area in excess of the first 40,000 square feet. 2The trailer parking requirement is calculated separately from the standard parking requirement and is based on a ratio of one stall per dock door. The number of trailer parking spaces that is required is 19 spaces and the number that is provided is 23 spaces. D. Technical Review Committee: The proposed project was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee on April 14, 2015. The Committee accepted the proposal and recommend approval. The Committees' conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. E. Design Review Committee: The proposed project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) on April 14, 2015, (Exhibit K). The Committee accepted the proposal, subject to the revisions recommended in the Comments prepared by Staff, and recommend approval. The Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the • Resolution of Approval. F. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, staff determined that, Item 1-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048— RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN May 27, 2015 Page 4 with the imposition of mitigation measures related to, for example, air quality (including greenhouse gases), biological resources, hydrology/water quality, and noise there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The project will not cause any significant traffic impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. Respectfully submitted, Candyce Burn Planning Director CB:MS/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit F - Floor Plan Exhibit G - Roof Plan Exhibit H - Building Sections Exhibit I - Building Elevations Exhibit J - Landscape Plan Exhibit K - Design Review Committee Action Comments (April 14, 2015) Exhibit L - Proposed Mitigated Neg Dec & Initial Study Parts I, II, and III Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2014-01048 Item 1-4 mmsr l or"'' .. �.,•'.i. . Fua C [� 3 SIMYI RaYT �Y n F �` • SbAallk 3"}r�GP° 3G anvr.x Yr• grn,aws, aws u.a BANYMI Si Y 6 v c rr u ALM i Y a :. �I a �yy ^♦ 3 \cs. .. LOMA "F4. 1 MMmS u• i Ta x.0 C £ Y.s:. 1 Y i� t Scn\ a.1iR jY • I A r f YnAi[,yly. p Fg$ 6 i •.:� G � -.V..� � M1tN'.. p Y, � •? S *. YWEYARD s -._� ... 1 E �N q.aWF. ■■ Y jp.t - "�/ [ ' YYauYYt J:3.1r MMPARK H�GNF1tltlAYF j� "'MGXIMGh4F 1.5. :i. f pp .nm.. .u+•a^.i YSTFA pn 3 F E f " ; e 't, 4 y,.'\ j''S f' ? L rbflYn 11 .m,r�. x- !♦ -_ 1y R iem'. ♦ sMY ,Kc JS. ♦-pi ` p i a 19TH ST`i Os AYE wn Y r %li' ey s +Na +f ♦ �,,. 5 S_ LFFB r S „3vl w AVE 4`:�Y, AT•2 1 a".r ' jai a L rnwsnE1! KK m _r t � © m Fak a ss 55 prt 'Ar ,5r:+ ... AT r_ ew �4• 3 ¢ r r {y cl I m.s \H'e � .. � � � ".i- 33%' �s °A?' 1,u •�• ��t..e F r � � d ♦�' LVI tAJ S* simx r♦ .ti+ L � S '��YMCI, vR!A41 �w. � �.: •Y.. x x.,, { +♦ w. s f it ' , x. o x .- <c-. �5 R t 3< n fev T„♦kt,A Pw 1. • r r ©ALLiu S ' s iy . a..�..♦. .. E ! _u�i aCARNEUAN '4 t:. ♦ Yy[:.—� _� � ALTA uG .;i,' .axnA �,. �• `¢ '\ r aYus LOVA " ~yr. rr •. ,Yf•})'. ; rnnaDcucAHa'+cA .. .aru4 $ 3 ,sr!as m �i - > t*1TlAL PARK 1 BASE LINE ue k RD 4r C o.� ...� `AASF LINE .I RD, It c f!F£�� PlwAO i SMt 4A119 ST 1 PYoRiTPU 1�.l - y E94+s ♦ MISA 41 e Y x.'r� a �F;tAFFN :. I i A V♦ t t 4rt lAC f 7 i r, � § OLWI . . tif• i YJ IK ti .f. gg LUCAMONOAF # `7 ...... 1 ��.•. r a F i?y RIM G,r 4-H%Y SC � Y � .. L `c � I":" � ! �}".�• YYSSER a. ;,' 1 s s 1 .9 'yr •� �`✓ s `s � ,axYw •• a �t: � � 3 � P ; r �AaE '�4 » r,.arore '4... P/ $ s iv"Y r .. E,�„°• t 4; ;2 hFn ��ee 1 : `pynrFlgErj�b h', C�c,„,on •R,va - r'sYP - [RN[v 5 vrs g' a,,i• as '”' p9_Y 3 s s 3 _' J �gyrRAt -'sl ' :rN.oa.a C TERRA VISTA rEORr� • 'enmws c:Ir Abtlon 2;. 's +;.r. � TOWN CENTER - - L FOOTHILL BL +1 rsoxc k,. cwar „�° o � PROJECT SITE AER" "r CITY 1; HALL t'GrT= =AA6LE \ST 'gOR rARRQWQUW r .z yR tW 3a - ga `'� 11YARD A METROLINK TRAINTH STr 71 Gw t 51H s'ly- cOUASR MAI rte!•+• EXH I B IT Ar �.f 4TH ST _ C 1, } •� �7 i _ to ,� "�•[ � �.�� r r: '•4 �r �I.la]rl LL G� F ` _ ------- 6th Street -, _ _ m - -- x _ SITE UTILIZATION MAP 16, F Ll WCINITY MAP _ 5�4 4L' W:i4N Ba�G • �.tiff B:A.��':e Bu .:W a:00•:� I •.•5 ..0 W. Gwry:W.:>Wn 1 ri •I i SITE UTILIZATION MAPHUITf ZOLIARS UTICA INDU —. 1 CITY a o CUCAM.. m XVICINITY M I f� � 1 "- f` PRUACT DATA I - �, FOpFPAINi I -'.:. � � MLZZANIL I r,: 4 NEW INDUSTRIAL I I` F a. I , BUILDING Y _. •- - ___-.. __—-•-- 1 ID 00 0 area I � `� x APPLICANT T DEVELOPER i 9 SITE f PLANIENEPAL NOTES T. ' i y "^ FIRE DEPT GENERAL No iun� :,,,.+. j x• wwiounx.x wu. . SITE PLAN Al-1 DNC 2014.01046 m - 7TH 5T7(EI I' YICINITVMAP ' n l L I '� 4 1 � I �''• I � Ju,�,..i I k I Xi , F PM tN13 " F : Fll I i �D LEGEND m 1 1A 11 _..,, 3 NaxCtL OWN.- Y L-F-c UTICA AVENUE TYPICAL 8ECTIM I ,. oA. o T, owXYN T 1 T 1 7 —.....LIN .... — — eecT CONCEPTUAL GAADWO,DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN HUI�—ZQI_IlIN 1 O-S ON A• A AVENUE / '.��- FOX -�.� `- ` UTICA INDUSTRIAL WAgENOUBE J_`.....�. ..., ... - 1 - Y OF PI✓ICXO CUCAYOYOA rn -- -- - X . - -n WAREHOUSE ARE , r U A — Ifid'"SF NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ��reuisn i ra�c�wcuvmxxna�:a i t (D 3 CD � ! , 1 r I DEVELOPER. I I FLOOR PLAN A2-1 UWc za(Hw,we Y♦ -- .-' NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDING emamxn WNI'AXIC�NAWWI:�G (D 3 APPI ICAM -_-_ r r �. DEVELOPER I � � 1 junrwo. I ROOF PLAN SGl!I' N'if A2-2 DRC 2014-01048 - I��. NEW iNousTxiu pl BU,LD'NG ti1116111G • _ _ iwAC1A LYlAM]11NVG .+ SECTION B-B:NORTH-SOUTH BUILDING SECTION 1D 3 i hi N x ::; ? E Y APPLICANT: DEVELOPER' SECTION A-A:EAST-WEST BUILDING SECTION M A4-1 URC 10U-010(8 m X 00 iw ® I0 NORTHWEST CORNER WEST ELEVATION NLW INGUSTRIM BUILDING wnmxa �,,..,nu vLYsuquAu rhe (D I \ rrm T SOUTH ELEVATION DEVELOPER. L { €., _ ail EAST ELEVATION Jiwl NORTH ELEVATION A3-1 DRC 0014-01046 NOT APART ;tifir VIII EXISTING LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS ...,, k m �. E�yE,LEceNDrvu 44 Co COhGFPi PL1NL 5CHE0ULE a ° WTr PROPOSED BUILDING a i T. U) o o W [ It I r >g r 3 ITF ^.. Ja REFERENCE NOTES SCNEWLE d en-g-Thlwnxa[viwrcM +ixxialra ..rin5... �"' L•l� wuamww ..0.iwv....x..e . . y QAPART �� x„ o.EXISTING LLIIGHT INDUSTRIAL JZ Q F BUILDINGS w� a �'�`""E Eix�iue 1 1 1 y , RuemF • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA L;uRo cam, APRIL 14, 2015 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California i I. CALL TO ORDER ACTION Roll Call 7:00 p.m. Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett. Donald Granger X Alternates: Ray Wimberly_ Frances Howdyshell_ ® Lou Munoz II. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be. forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW A. The Committee DRC2014-01048-RGA Office of Architectural Design for Oakmont Industrial recommended the Group-A proposal to construct an industrial building of about 161,000 square project move forward i feet on a parcel of about 322,000 square feet(7.4 acres)within the General to the Planning Industrial (GI) District, located on the east side of Utica Avenue between Commission for 6th Street and 7th Street-APN: 0202-411-36. review. 1 of 2 • EXHIBIT K Item 1-15 I x DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA _ MMON RCHO APRIL 14, 2015 C;I,Tr1:NONC4 III. PUBLIC COTNMENTS Mone. - This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. IV. AD,IOURNMEIV'T T 12 p.m. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m.adjournment time. If items go beyond that time,they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 2of2 Item 1-16 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith April 14, 2015 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048 — RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN -A proposal to construct an industrial building of about 161,000 square feet on a parcel of about 322,000 square feet (7.4 acres) within the General Industrial (GI) District, located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street -- APN: 0209-411-36. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Design Parameters: The project site is a parcel with an approximate area of 322,000 square feet (7.4 acres). The parcel is 607 feet (east-west) by 512 feet (north to south). The parcel is vacant and is dominated by short grasses. The project site is one of three parcels that resulted from the subdivision of a property of about 25 acres that was owned by Coca-Cola and partially developed with one of their bottling facilities. That subdivision was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission, on December 12, 2012 (Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19397). The project site is bound on the north by small industrial buildings and to the east by a logistics building of about 175;000 square feet. To the south is an office complex. Along the west side of the project site will be the future alignment of Utica Avenue which currently terminates near the northwest and southwest corners of the project site. To the west, on the opposite side of the future street, is another vacant parcel(one of the other parcels of the aforementioned subdivision). At the northwest corner of the project site is an easement area of about 3,500 square feet with dimensions of about 70 feet (east-west) and 76 feet (north-south) in favor of the Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD)that is enclosed by a metal rod fence. The zoning of the property and all properties to the north, east, and south is General Industrial (GI) District while the zoning of the property to the • west is Industrial Park (IP) District. The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of approximately 1,085 feet and 1,070 feet, respectively. The applicant proposes to construct a logistics building of about 161,000 square feet. The height of the proposed building will vary due to the undulating parapet wall and slope of the roof(screened behind it). The building will have a maximum height of about 48 feet when measured from the finished grade to the top of the highest part of the parapet wall while the roof line will be about 1 to 5 feet lower than the adjoining parapet wall'height. The building is speculative at this time. Typical for this type of building,there will be an office area located at the southwest corner of the building. The dock loading/storage area with 19 dock doors will be located on the south side of the building. There will be two points of access via new driveways at the southwest and northwest corners of the project site. The building is required to have 90 passenger vehicle parking stalls; 91 parking stalls will be provided. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt-up construction painted with a palette of several colors. The building will have form-lined concrete accents. An additional primary material will be metal accents while a secondary material will be glass panels. Generous amounts of blue-tinted glass have been provided at the office area and at various locations along the wall planes of the building that are most visible. An interesting feature of the building will be the well-articulated wall planes at the office area. Another characteristic that will add interest is the horizontally articulated vertical elements that interrupt the massing of primary wall planes. These vertical elements include glass panels. At various locations there are also horizontal metal accents that project from the wall plane. These accents punctuate the application of glass and provide shade relief. On all corners of the buildings, with the exception of the northeast corner; there are enhancement comprised of glass, Item 1-17 DRC AGENDA DRC2014-01048 - RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN April 14, 2015 Page 2 variations in color, metal canopies;score lines, and relief in the wall plane that,altogether, reflect the general appearance of the office corner. As is typical for this type of project and due to its operating characteristics and layout, landscaping will be generally concentrated along the street frontage of the project site. The average depth of landscape along the street will comply with the minimum 25 feet as specified in the Development Code. Along the north, south, and east sides of the project site the perimeter landscaping will be at least 5 feet in width with the exception of an area of about 120 feet in length(north-south)near the southeast corner of the building. At this location, the minimum width of the fire lane is 26 feet, as required by the Fire Department, and there are five(5)parallel parking stalls. The landscape strip is only about 2 feet in width adjacent to these parking stalls. However,staff considers this deficit to be acceptable as the landscape strip located between the north end of this set of parking stalls and the northeast corner of the project site (a distance of about 300 feet) is 10 feet wide, i.e. twice the required width. The landscape coverage is 10.8 percent-the minimum requirement is 10 percent for this Development District. The design and layout of the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and the design guidelines of the General Industrial (GI)District. The massing and height of the proposed building is consistent with that of a logistics building and its design will be consistent with the character of its surroundings which is principally industrial in nature. It is not expected that the project as proposed will detrimentally affect the use and operations of neighboring,existing, or future developments nor create traffic or pedestrian hazards. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. None. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections(FDC)required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC)and Fire Department Connections(FDC)screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone to match the building. Item 1-18 DRC AGENDA DRC2014-01048 - RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN • April2015 3 Page 3 2. All ground-mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back-flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on- center. All ground-mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 3. The employee lunch area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the building,and tables, chairsfbenches. and waste receptacles shall be provided. 4. Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 5. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. 6. All walls, including retaining walls, exposed to public view shali be constructed of decorative masonry blocks, i.e. slump stone, split-face, or have a decorative finish such as stucco. 7. Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the 25-foot setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. B. All doors (roll-up. dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the • adjacent wall or glass panel. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of the project to the Planning Commission, and forward it to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Mike Smith Members Present: • Item 1-19 City of Rancho Cucamonga • MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Development Review DRC2014-01048 Public Review Period Closes: May 27, 2015 Project Name: Project Applicant: RGA Office of Architectural Design Chris Savage Project Location (also see attached map): Located within the General Industrial (GI) District on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street - APN: 0209-411-36. Project Description: A proposal to construct an industrial building of about 161,000 square feet on a parcel of about 322,000 square feet (7.4 acres). FINDING • This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. • May 27, 2015 Date of Determination Adopted By EXHIBIT L Item 1-20 :•/ ( ,am ong► it Q , �� Q ;��.:or� Rain-f '>�� - ' :Il.:i�::;;..�;w}._ .I• - z> 1 � yz : • i .Vi i'II Q i �z /, (l�7 L A / i {=centralRl�NCA —4��1 h A F 3ch q: • ¢ L .. pp .. ;.. eta• I C.ca^onga Wnery a CUCAMONGA Li ;Historcal Land ark) i-PArk , FOO TH2L • ��rzv)S�- ♦ 311 B ✓9 -- BM1208 alp Ic PROJECT SITE ..+ � E. I ': 1 I • � � Cucamonga) t :7A , Seh,l.y , Y 'a y; f �hrz _'_ - . ..... y �.�-��'1 . : `•• .'�! ] ,. :J•• . ,r; s.-�f TCWISON 8TH__ —TOPEKA�L m fo FEEDER UPPER - — Well •__. - .. P p Sr •�' —_--. l ___ _-_ ,_ 3 6TH _ ' I =_ >> We I ST 1,_�r ._ �,_ �SANBERN4lQDINO ';n,a.<, i _. _ _ ------- -----_ A✓E _ RANCHO Ta^k. he, cll �_ ONTARIO ''I'; - r - CORPORATE 1 > z r r _ Tar Guasti ¢ r� _ A _5r 53963'� NT We Re 1 t osz M a n a - a sa Iter I—L11 - ¢ CITY 0P WHO CUCAMONGA Print Form NOV 2 0 Z01 RECEIVED PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL Ltld� .. INFORMATION FORM (Part I m Initial Study) RANCHO (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) CUCAMONGA Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to,traffic, noise, biological,drainage,and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part Il as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. GENERAL• O. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal: City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. �►►/ /� � ! t� /� /� Application Number for the project to which this form pertains. ��VGIJ Ww W 1 1$"(4.V(" 1 Project Title: Name&Address of project owner(s). CRP Oakmont 6th & Utica, LLC Name&Address of developer or project sponsor: Oakmont Industrial Group 3520 Piedmont Rd., Suite 100, Atlanta, GA 30305 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 1 of 10 Item 1-22 Contact Person&Address: John Atwell, 3520 Piedmont Rd., Suite 100, Atlanta, GA 30305 Name&Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): Telephone Number775-250-1495 PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk(*)is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east. and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): The project is located on Utica Avenue north of 6th Street and south of 7th Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): AP N 0209-411-36 `5) Gross Site Area(ac/sq. ft.): 7.39 acres/322,100 sf `6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 7.31 acres/318,600 sf dedications): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): N/A Updated 4/1112013 Page 2 of 10 Item 1=23 ® 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Design Review and Environmental Assessment 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees. trails and roads., drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information(i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies.biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): Please refer to attached Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis and Geotechnical Report. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 3 of 10 Item 1-24 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): There are no known cultural or historical aspects of the site. 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft;roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: Please refer to the attached Noise Study. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase,and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: The project includes construction of a high cube, logistics warehouse that includes approximately 8,000 squaLe feet of office for a total building area of 162,300 square feet on 7.31 acres. The proposed building will be constructed as a Concrete Tilt Up building. The project includes 86 standard and handicap parking spaces, 23 trailer spaces, and 21 dock doors. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural; historical., or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.), intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses. shops: department stores: etc.)and scale of development(height; frontage. setback, rear yard, etc.).- The tc.):The project site is surrounded by industrial uses or vacant land on all sides. All of the land adjacent to the project site are zoned industrial. The location is infill in nature and the site has been heavily disturbed from previous grading efforts. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 Item 1-25 14) MY the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No, the project is of a similar use, scale and character of the surrounding properties. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. Now will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Please refer to attached Noise Study. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees. There are no scenic trees on site and multiple new trees will be planted both on the project site and on the extension of Utica Avenue. • 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: None. 18) indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification; please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) Peak use(gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. 1,863 (gal/day/ac) Peak use(gal/min/ac) 19) indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank x❑ Sewer. if septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) 1,863 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 Item 1-26 i RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size. Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ . to $ Rent(per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24) Indicate the expected number of schoolchildren who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial. industrial or institutional uses: Industrial warehouse and corporate office. Updated 4111/2013 Page 6 of 10 Item 1-27 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 157,060 SF of warehouse, 4,080 SF of office. 27) indicate hours of operation: Unknown at this time. 28) Number of employees: Total:Unknown at this time. Maximum Shift. Time of Maximum Shift.- 29) hift:29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications: including wage and salary ranges: as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): Unknown at this time. ® 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: Unknown. '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818)572-6283). Please refer to attached Air Quality Study. ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water..sewer,fire. and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so. please indicate their response. Yes, and they all were affirmative. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 7 of 10 Item 1-28 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include,but are not limited to PCB's:radioactive substances:pesticides and herbicides,fuels,oils;solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. No. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas. shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No. 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts.statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: j�' l) Signature: _ ,1 _ (-'O Title: tin 0 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 8 of 10 Item 1-29 ATTACHMENT "A" ® CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows • Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments: Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 9 of 10 Item 1-30 i ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 9.1762 (909) 988-8511 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 10 of 10 Item 1-31 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review DRC2014-01048 2. Related Files: n/a 3. Description of Project: A proposal to construct an industrial building of about 161,000 square feet on a parcel of about 322,000 square feet (7.4 acres) in the General Industrial (GI) District located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street Street; APN: 0209-411-36 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: RGA Office of Architectural Design 15231 Alton Parkway, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92618 5. General Plan Designation: General Industrial 6, Zoning: General Industrial (GI) District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is a parcel with an area of about 322,000 square feet (7.4 acres) located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street Street. The parcel is about 607 feet(east-west) by about 512 feet(north- south). The parcel is vacant and is dominated by short grasses. The project site is one of three parcels that resulted from the subdivision of a property of about 25 acres that was owned by Coca-Cola and partially developed with one of their bottling facilities. That subdivision was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on December 12, 2012 (related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19397). The project site is bound on the north by small industrial buildings and to the east by a logistics building of about 175,000 square feet. To the south is an office complex. Along the west side of the project site will be the future alignment of Utica Avenue which currently terminates near the northwest and southwest corners of the project site. To the west, on the opposite side of the future street, is another vacant parcel (one of the other parcels of the aforementioned subdivision). At the northwest corner of the project site is an easement of about 3,500 square feet in favor of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The zoning of the property and all properties to the north, east, and south is General Industrial (GI) District while the zoning of the property to the west is Industrial Park (IP) District. The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1,085 feet and 1,070 feet, respectively. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith, Associate Planner (909)477-2750 Item 1-32 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 2 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): n/a GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD—California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR—Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR- Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PM10—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (x)Aesthetics ( )Agricultural Resources (x)Air Quality (x)Biological Resources (x)Cultural Resources (x)Geology&Soils (x)Greenhouse Gas Emissions ( )Hazards&Waste Materials (x)Hydrology&Water Quality ( )Land Use&Planning ( )Mineral Resources (x)Noise ( )Population& Housing ( )Public Services ( )Recreation ( ) Transportation/Traffic ( )Utilities&Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( } I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a-significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-33 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048. Page 3 • ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuan to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are impose on the proposed project, nothing furthe is required. Prepared By: Date: �5 f \ fL / Reviewed By: Date: Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-34 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact. Incorporated Impact Im act EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C) The project site is located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street. The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north and east, a business office park to the south, and a vacant parcel to the west (on the opposite side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue). The visual. quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. The site will be developed with a logistics building that will be similar to other logistics buildings in the City. Staff has determined that the architecture of the building is consistent with the design standards, guidelines, and policies established by the Planning Commission and City Council. The project complies with the City's technical requirements including floor area ratio; minimum building, parking lot, and wall setbacks; dock and storage area screening; and landscape coverage as described in the Development Code. Approval by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission is required prior to construction of the buildings. City standards require the applicant to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project will increase the number of street lights in the immediate vicinity and the amount of industrial lighting used within the site - particularly within the dock and storage areas. The design and placement of street lights will be required to comply with City standards including requirements for shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Although industrial lighting can be a source of substantial glare, such lighting will be required to comply with the City standards for maximum height applicable to light poles and wall-mounted lights. The impact is not considered significant. Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-35 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in • conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The project site is located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street. The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north and east, a business office park to the south, and a vacant parcel to the west (on the opposite side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue). There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no • Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-36 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potnifica r With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The project site is located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street. The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north and east, a business office park to the south, and a vacant parcel to the west (on the opposite side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue). There are no agricultural uses within one mile of the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) (✓ ) ( ) ( ) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As discussed in subsection b, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (Os), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM,o and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others Rev 4-7-15 Item I-37 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 7 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Impact have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. ® Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (S02), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM10 and PM2.s. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air- quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in October 2014 that utilizes CaIEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. • Short Term (Construction): Proiect Emissions and Impacts The project proposes the construction of an industrial building of about 161,000 square feet on a parcel of about 322,000 square feet (7.4 acres). The project site is currently Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-38 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su PP g ortin Information Sources: Fgnifi ant with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incor orateo Impact Impact vacant. The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. Summary of Peak Construction Emissions (Emissions Summary of Overall Construction with Best Available Control Measures) -Maxlmiumn Consth tion Daily.E.rrdssion_Allbsfda' .: Activity ROG NO, CO SOX PM,o PM2.5 Summer 2015 74.76 62.97 49.77 0.08 10.48 6.76 Winter 2015 74.83 62.98 50.02 0.08 10.48 6.76 Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Substantial? No No No No No No ROG= reactive organic gases; NO.=oxides of nitrogen;CO=carbon monoxide; SOX=oxides of sulfur; PM,o and PM2.s=particulate matter Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment-(Table 9)(CaIEEMod Output) MIG/Hogle-Ireland,October 2014 Construction activities associated with the project will result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NOx, SOX, PM,o and PM2.5 and are expected from the following construction activities: demolition, grading (including soil import), building construct, painting (architectural coatings) paving (curb, gutter, flatwork, and parking lot), and construction worker commuting. Localized Significance Summary(Construction Emissions) According to the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG/Hogle= Ireland in October 2014, maximum daily oxides of nitrogen (NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) emissions will occur during construction of the project, grading of the project site, and paving of facility parking lots and drive aisles. Emissions from construction activities will not exceed any localized threshold. Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions; however, as shown in the tables above, the amount will not exceed any threshold of significance. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and Rev 4-7-15 Item I-39 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PSignificgnifi ally with Than ant Mitigation Sigrofican! No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROGs and are part of the O3 precursors. Based on the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in October 2014, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of 74.83 lbs of VOC per day (combined for all construction sources) during construction. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses • would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following Best Available Control Measures (BACM) identified as mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less-than-significant: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the project proponent shall submit, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, a Coating Restriction Plan (CRP), consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) guidelines and a letter agreeing to include in any construction contracts and/or subcontracts a requirement that the contractors adhere to the CRP. The CRP measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Building Director. These may include the following: • That volatile organic compounds (VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 75 g/l for interior applications. • That volatile organic compounds (VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 75 g/l for exterior applications. • This measure shall conform to the performance standard that emissions of volatile organic compounds from application of interior or exterior coatings shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-40 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Coast Air Quality Management District: The CRP shall specify use of High- Volume, Low Pressure (HVLP) spray guns for application of coatings. 2) All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts: Short-Term Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM,o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short-term air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less-than-significant: 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low Rev 4-7-15 Item I-41 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 11 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentia+Y with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • 0 Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved • by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-42 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 13) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Proiect Lon4 Term (Operational) Emissions and Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project. Summary of Peak Operational Emissions illaxim�i DPerutional=Da�ilyl5riissloi s,IjltisYday) Source ROG NO,, CO SOXPM,o PM2.s Summer Area Sources 7.58 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.0 Energy Demand 0.25 2.26 1.90 0.01 0.17 0.17 Mobile Sources 1.75 5.64 j 22.96 0.06 3.90 1.10 Summer Total 9.58 7.80 1 24.89 0.07 4.07 1.27 Winter Area Sources 7.58 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Demand 0.25 2.26 1.90 0.01 0.17 0.17 Mobile Sources 1.80 5.95 22.17 0.05 3.90 1.10 Winter Total 9.63 8.21 24.07 0.06 4.07 1.27 Threshold 55 155 550 150 150 55 Substantial? No I No No No No No ROG= reactive organic gases; NOx=oxides of nitrogen; CO=carbon monoxide;SO.=oxides of sulfur; PMto and PM2.s=particulate matter Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment-(Table 10)(CaIEEMod Output) MIG/Hogle-Ireland October 2014 rLocer a;Nonlfica-hm Thrim.fioW i4r�atys�s:{ibslaay� =. 1 Activity CO NO, PMto PM2.s Grading 26.7 40.4 4.9 3.5 Building Construction 18.7 30.0 2.1 2.0 Paving 2015 15.0 25.1 1.4 1.3 Paving 2016 14.8 22.4 1.3 1.2 Architectural Coating 1.9 2.4 0.2 0.2 Threshold 863 118 51 4 Rev 4-7-15 Item I-43 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 13 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incor orateo Impact Impact Potentially Substantial? 1 No No No No CO=carbon monoxide; NOx=oxides of nitrogen; PM 10 and PM2.5=particulate matter I Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment-(Table 11)(CalEEMod Output) MIG/Hogle-Ireland, October 2014 Cumulative Impacts (Long Term/Operational Emissions) The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the potential impacts to air quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, continued development would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, all developments would be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a less-than-significant level. This City-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less-than-significant: • 14) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 15) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 16) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 17) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 18) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 19) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 20) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 21) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 22) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. • 23) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-44 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR(Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEfR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR, which are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less-than-significant. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located.within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is not located within 114 mile of a sensitive receptor. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less than-significant levels. e) Construction odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational odors (Long-term) are not typically associated with the type of use. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local .. or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the i California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-45 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 15 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street. The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north and east, a business office park to the south, and a vacant parcel to the west (on the opposite side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue). The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the • project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources. Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly(DSFLF) The site is located near an area for potential habitat for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly (DSFLF). According to the Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis (RECA) prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland on March 9, 2015, the entire project site is mapped as containing Tujunga loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (TuB), and Delhi sands were not found on the project site during the field survey. The Delhi Sands flower-loving fly is not expected to occur on the project site due to the lack of the characteristic Delhi soils habitat occurring on site. No Delhi Sands flower-loving flies were observed during the site visit on September 29, 2014. The project site is located northwest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly Habitat overlay and buffer zone. Burrowing Owl According to the Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis (RECA) prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland on March 9, 2015, approximately four ground squirrel burrows were observed during the field visit. Although no burrowing owl sign was noted, it is recommended that a clearance survey for burrowing owls prior to any site disturbance in accordance with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (March 2012) is conducted. The following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less-than-significant levels: • 1) Burrowing owl mitigation: a) Avoidance during the breeding season - Breeding season avoidance measures, including but not limited to those as follows shall be Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-46 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 16 Less Than Significant Less PotentiallyWith ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact implemented. A pre-construction survey for resident burrowing owls shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within 30 days prior to construction activities. If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre-construction survey, the site will be resurveyed for owls. Pre-construction survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non-breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre- construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre- construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation would be required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre-construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and would minimally include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. b) Burrow exclusion and/or closure during the non-breeding season - During the non-breeding season (September 1 through January 31). If burrows occupied by migratory or non-migratory resident burrowing owls are detected during a pre-construction survey, then burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. c) Nesting Birds - If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31). A preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. Mi-gratory Birds According to the Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis (RECA) prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland on March 9, 2015, a clearance survey for nesting birds prior to any site disturbance in accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Department of Fish and Wildlife Code is also recommended. The following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less-than- significant levels: Rev 4-7-15 Item I-47 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 17 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than S,gnificanl Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Impact 2) Migratory Birds Mitigation A preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted three (3) days prior to the commencement of vegetation removal, soil disturbance, grading, and/or construction on the project site. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) protocols. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. Other Candidate, Sensitive or Special Status Species and Plant Communities According to the General Biological Assessment prepared by Natural Resources Assessment, Inc. on November 12, 2014, there are no documented special status plant occurrences and there is no critical habitat for any listed plants in the project vicinity. The project site has been graded and is primarily characterized by ruderal plant species such as Russian thistle. No sensitive or special status wildlife or plant species were observed on the project site during the site visit. • b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project.- a) roject.a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? • b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-48 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Potentially wits ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) . (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site. However, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts.of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 3) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Rev 4-7-15 Item I-49 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporat=_o Impact Impact Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 4) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to,the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The project site is located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street. The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north and east, a business office park to the south, and a vacant parcel to the west (on the opposite side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue). The project site has already been disrupted by surrounding developments and annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-50 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) { ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault is about 2.25 miles to the northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies about 6 miles to the north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing MW 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to MW 7.5 earthquakes, is about 17 miles northeasterly of the site, and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to MW 8.2 earthquakes, is about 19 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction.activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust Rev 4-7-15 Item I-51 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation S gnificant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. • c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand (TUB) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand (TuB) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically stable. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No impacts are anticipated. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the • environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-52 Initial Study for ' City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially with Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) Regulations and Significance—The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas (GHG) emissions reduction target in Executive Order(EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020: and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human.health; and (2)that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines 6 key GHGs (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)). The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure. and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PM1o, PM2.5, and SO2 Rev 4-7-15 Item I-53 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.s levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Proiect Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions. However, a screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is based upon South Coast Air Quality Management District staffs proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary sources emissions for non-industrial projects, as described in the • SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIGIHogle-Ireland in October 2014, total project related emissions would be 20.8 MTCO2eq/year, as shown in the following table: Short-Tenn(Construction)Greenhouse Gas Emissions(MT/year) CO2 CH4 N20 Total' 2015 624 0.1 0.00 624.1 Amortized i Tota12 20.8 i 0.00 I 0.00 20.8 1: MTCO2E 2: Amortized over 30-years Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment-(Table 12)(CaIEEMod Output) MIG/Hogle-Ireland, October 2014 As shown in the table, direct and indirect operational emissions associated with the project as compared to the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance of 3,000 MTCO2e per year would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions — The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel-powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. • Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition. grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-54 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 24. Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil- based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cho, and N2O. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIGIHogle-Ireland in October 2014, no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term construction impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant short-term cumulative.impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers'specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for"adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. ;z ;Y;iLong�Teim{Operational)Gteenhouse=Gas,EM*Sions=(MT/year) CO2 CH4 N2O Total' Energy Usage 2,405 0.0 0.0 2,405 Mobile Sources 899 0.1 0.0 899 Rev 4-7-15 Item I-55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 25 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation. Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Solid Waste 69 1.8 0.0 69 Water/Wastewater 187 0.15 0.0 i 187 Total 3,560 3.1 0.0 3,563.1 1: MTCO2E Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment-(Table 13)(CaIEEMod Output) MIG/Hogle-Ireland,October 2014 The project involves the construction of an industrial building of about 161,000 square feet on a parcel of about 322,000 square feet (7.4 acres) and, therefore, would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping; shade trees; bike racks; walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the • CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping; shade trees; bike racks; walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in October 2014, no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-56 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Thar.Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation SignificantNo Impact Incorporated Impact Im act • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • . Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City 'of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project involves the construction of an industrial building of about 161,000 square feet on a parcel of about 322,000 square feet (7.4 acres), which is consistent with the General Plan. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. 'The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping; shade trees; bike racks; walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools and therefore is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant, unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Rev 4-7-15 Item I-57 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 27 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant Nc Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Based on the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIGIHogle-Ireland in October 2014, no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term, construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to GHGs from short-term construction and long- term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly(AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? • c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-58 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su pp g ortin Information Sources: Potentially w,th Than Signnificant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed logistics building is to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is-more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed logistics building is to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. C) There is no school located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The nearest school to the project site, Rancho Cucamonga Middle School, is about 0.84-mile to the northwest at 10022 Feron Boulevard. The proposed logistics building is to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance material site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR'Exhibit 4.8-1 and is within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located about 1.6 miles north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located about 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. Rev 4-7-15 Item I-59 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 29 • Less Thar: Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentivy with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incoroorated Impact Impact g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. The project includes the construction of a street (a missing segment of Utica Avenue) along the west perimeter of the project site which will, in turn, link the existing segments of Utica Avenue which currently terminate at the southwest and northwest corners of the project site. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) requirements? • b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the, course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( } ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (✓) ( } ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard • delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-60 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 30 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated. Impact Impact i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Huitt-Zollars in January 2015, which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non- structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Rev 4-7-15 Item I-61 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 31 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when • there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post- Construction Operational.- Prior perational:Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the • use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-62 Initial Study for . City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 32 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyignifWith Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporates Impact Im act of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development and, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a), less than significant impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-63 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 33 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Huitt-Zollars, Inc. in January 2015 to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) () ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street. The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north and east, a business office park to the south, and a vacant parcel to the west (on the opposite side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue). This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding industrial development. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is General Industrial. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is for the construction of an industrial building of about 161,000 square feet on a parcel of about 322,000 square Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-64 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 34 .Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallySignificant with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact feet (7.4 acres). This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding industrial development. The development of the site will be consistent with the land use designations as described in the Development Code and General Plan. The minimum building, parking lot, and wall setbacks; dock and storage area screening; and landscape coverage are consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street. The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north and east, a business office park to the south, and a vacant parcel to the west (on the opposite side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue). The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. _ ......- 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) {✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (10 ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Rev 4-7-15 Item I-65 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. The future street frontage along Utica Avenue will be about 540 feet. The principal source of noise that would impact the project site is traffic. Generally, warehouse/distribution operations are not sensitive to noise impacts. The office use associated with such operations would be the most sensitive to noise impacts. However, due to the concrete wall construction of the buildings and the setbacks between the buildings and the street, noise impacts will be less than significant. Noise from the site will most likely be generated by truck traffic and dock area activities — all other activities will be conducted within the buildings. Per the Noise Study prepared by • MIG/Hogle-Ireland in October 2014, existing without and with project exterior noise levels will not exceed the 70 dBA CNEL standard[and] traffic noise levels at the proposed facility will not exceed the 70 dBA CNEL standard established by the City for Class A Industrial uses. In any event, the mitigation measures listed below will further reduce exterior noise levels to less-than-significant levels: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. The measures listed under 12.d also will further reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels. b) The proposed industrial building is to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. The City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed building: hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby uses is expected. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding uses. Per the Noise Study prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in October 2014, vibration from use of heavy construction equipment for the proposed project would be below the thresholds to cause damage to nearby structures and result in barely perceptible vibration. Construction of the project does not require rock blasting, pile driving, or the use of a jack hammer, but will use a vibratory roller, small bulldozer, and • loaded trucks. All of the receptors will experience barely perceptible vibration from construction of the proposed project. Furthermore, these construction activities will be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM Mondays through Saturdays. With regard to long-term operational impacts, activities associated with the project will not result in any Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-66 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 36 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact vibration-related impacts to adjacent or on-site properties. In any event, the measures listed under 12.d will further reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than- significant levels. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Noise from the site will most likely be generated by truck traffic and dock area activities — all other activities will be conducted within the buildings. The dock area will be screened from the street by a concrete tilt-up wall of a minimum 8 feet in height. There are no sensitive receptors immediately adjacent to the project site. Per the Noise Study prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in October 2014, traffic noise levels will increase more than 3 dBA as a result of the proposed project as shown in Table 11 (Change in Noise Levels) for two receptor locations. Receptor #4, located on the eastern corner of the Utica Avenue and 7th Street Street intersection, has a change in noise levels of 9.6 dBA and receptor #5, located on the western corner of the Utica Avenue and 7th Street Street intersection, has a change in noise levels of 4.7 dBA. The traffic impact analysis did not take traffic counts on Utica Avenue and 7th Street Street; however, based on observations at the project site, there is light activity from vehicular and truck traffic due to driveways serving the.two adjacent warehouse buildings. In addition, the ambient noise measurement for that intersection, as previously indicated in Table 1, is greater than the modeled roadway noise levels with project. In addition, the adjacent industrial uses are not sensitive receptors. Other receptors that were analyzed did not exceed a difference of 3 dBA for change in traffic noise levels; therefore impacts will be less than significant. In any event, the measures listed in 12.a will mitigate the short-term noise impacts to a level of less than significant. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Limit construction activities to the hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM Monday through Saturday. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Planning Director, or designee during routine inspections. 2) Stationary construction noise sources such as generators or pumps must be located at least 100 feet from sensitive land uses, as feasible, or at maximum distance when necessary to complete work near sensitive land uses. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 3) Construction staging areas must be located as far from noise sensitive land uses as feasible. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 4) Throughout construction, the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with included noise attenuating devices and are properly maintained. This mitigation measure shall be periodically monitored Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-67 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 37 Less Thar. Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Tnar Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 5) Idling equipment must be turned off when not in use. This mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 6) Equipment must be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. This mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 7) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 8) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their ® findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The project site is located about 1.6 miles north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located about 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. • Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-68 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 38 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiallyignifwith Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a,demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No significant impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is vacant land and, therefore, there will be no displacement of housing or people. No impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is vacant land and, therefore, there will be no displacement of housing or people. No impacts are anticipated. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? C) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The project site, located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street Street, would be served by Fire Station #4 at 11297 Jersey Boulevard located about 0.75-mile to the northeast of the site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-69 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 39 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. C) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is Old Town Park at 10033 Feron Boulevard located about 0.83-mile northwest of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. • According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is Old Town Park at 10033 Feron Boulevard located about 0.83-mile northwest of the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. • b) See a) response above. Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-70 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 40 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) The proposed project is the construction of an industrial building of about 161,000 square feet. Per the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. on October 10, 2014, implementation of the proposed project will generate 353 weekday daily PCE trips, 22 weekday AM peak hour PCE trips (17 inbound, 5 outbound),and 26 weekday PM peak hour PCE trips (9 inbound, 17 outbound). As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections.. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) Per the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. on October 10, 2014, implementation of the proposed project will generate 353 weekday daily PCE trips, Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-71 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 41 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 22 weekday AM peak hour PCE trips (17 inbound, 5 outbound), and 26 weekday PM peak hour PCE trips (9 inbound, 17 outbound). In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. C) Located about 1.6 miles north of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. No impacts are anticipated. • d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to construct Utica Avenue, including associated street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk)along the west perimeter of the project site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The design of the project includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction including bicycle racks at the office area, preferential parking for car/vanpools, pedestrian connections to the public sidewalks, etc. No impacts are anticipated. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? • c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-72 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 42 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potential aty with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-73 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 43 • Less Thar: Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact g) This project complies with Federal. State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other • current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: The project site is located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street. The site is generally characterized by industrial development to the north and east, a business office park to the south, and a vacant parcel to the west (on the opposite side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue). The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. The site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals. According to the Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis (RECA) prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland on March 9, 2015, the entire project site is mapped as containing Tujunga loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (TuB), and Delhi sands were not found on the project site during the field survey. The Delhi Sands flower-loving fly is not expected to occur on the project site due to the lack of the characteristic Delhi soils habitat occurring on site. No Delhi Sandsflower-loving flies were observed during the site visit on September 29, 2014. Approximately four ground squirrel burrows were observed during the field visit[and] no burrowing owl sign was noted. [Also] there are no documented special status plant occurrences and there is no critical habitat for any listed plants in the project vicinity. The project site has been graded and is primarily characterized by ruderal plant species such as Russian thistle. No sensitive or special status wildlife or plant species were observed on the project site during the site visit. The • mitigation measures listed in the Biological section of this Initial Study will reduce the impacts to the nesting activities of native and migratory bird species to less-than- significant. Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-74 _Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 44 b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive and/or have been attached (on a CD) to this document for review: (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19,1981) (T) Industrial.Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18, EIR (SCH#93102055, certified June 15, 1994) (T) Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment (MIG/Hogle-Ireland, October 2014) (T) Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis (RECA) Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-75 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 45 ® (MIG/Hogle-Ireland, March 9, 2015) (T) Noise Study (MIG/Hogle-Ireland, October 2014) (T) Traffic Impact Analysis (Kunzman Associates, Inc., October 10, 2014) (T) Water Quality Management Plan (Huitt-Zollars, Inc., January 2015) • Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-76 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 46 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: Date: _. Print Name and Title: Rev 4-7-15 Item 1-77 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review DRC2014-01048 This Mitigation Monitoring Program(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Item 1-78 Mitigation Monitoring Program Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwritten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Item 1-79 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART 111) Project File No.: Development Review DRC2014-01048 Applicant: RGA Office of Architectural Design Initial Study Prepared by: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Date: April 16, 2015 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action _ for Monitoring Frequency_ Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance Section 3–Air Quality — - Short Term (Construction) Emissions 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the project PD I C Review of plans A/C 2/4 proponent shall submit, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, a Coating Restriction Plan (CRP), consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) guidelines and a letter agreeing to include in any construction contracts and/or subcontracts a requirement that the contractors adhere to the CRP. The CRP measures shall be 3 implemented to the satisfaction of City Building I Director. These may include the following: o That volatile organic compounds (VOC).of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 75 g/l for interior applications. • That volatile organic compounds (VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 75 g/I for exterior applications. This measure shall conform to the performance standard that emissions of volatile organic compounds from application of interior or exterior coatings shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The CRP shall specify use of High-Volume, Low Pressure (HVLP) spray guns for application of coatings. 2) All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. Page 1 of 16 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action _ _ _ for Monitoring Frequency­_ Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 5) All construction equipment shall be.maintained PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction 3 site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits; PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 00 the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that BO B Review of plans A/C 2 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Page 2 of 16 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action_ for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/InitialsNon-Com liance – -- - --- — All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance BO ! B Review of plans A/C 2 standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. r10) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction site through seeding and waterin . • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 roads. • Phase grading to prevent the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 susceptibility of large areas to erosion 3 _ --_over_extended periods of time. I Schedule activities to minimize the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. _ �– • Sweep streets according to a schedule BO C During construction A 4 established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. _ • Suspend grading operations during high BO C During construction A 4 winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403_r_equirements.__ • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard BO C During Construction A 4 ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. Page 3 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action _ for Monitoring _.Frequency_ Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance 12) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 13) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Long Term Emissions 1) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 2) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. M 3) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during 3 off-peak hours. 00 4) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 5) Landscape with native and/or drought- resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 6) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 7) All industrial and commercial facilities shall BO C Review of plans A 4 post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 8) All industrial and commercial facilities shall PD C Review of plans A/C 2/3 designate preferential parking for vanpools. 9) All industrial and commercial site tenants with PD C Review of plans D 2/3 Page 4 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementin Action _ —.�_— _ for Monitoring Frequenc Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance 50 or more employees shall be required to — -- - post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 10) All industrial and commercial site tenants with PD C Review of plans D 2/3 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. Section 4 - Biological Resources 1) Burrowing owl mitigation: PD B Review of report A/D 4 a) Avoidance during the breeding season - Breeding season avoidance measures, including but not limited to those as follows shall be implemented. A pre-construction survey for resident burrowing owls shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within 30 days prior to construction activities. If ground- n disturbing activities are delayed or suspended 9 for more than 30 days after the pre- T" construction survey, the site will be � resurveyed for owls. Pre-construction survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D i (Breeding and Non-breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre-construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre- i construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation would be required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre-construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and would minimally include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. Page 5 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action _ _ for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance b) Burrow exclusion and/or closure during the non-breeding season - During the non- breeding season (September 1 through January 31). If burrows occupied by migratory or non-migratory resident burrowing owls are detected during a pre-construction survey, then burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. c) Nesting Birds - If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31). A preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided 3 through establishment of an appropriate buffer i setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife 00 biologist. The temporary "no construction" "' area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearingis proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. 2) Migratory Birds Mitigation PD B Review of report A/D 4 A preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted three (3) days prior to the commencement of vegetation removal, soil disturbance, grading, and/or construction on therp oiect site. If nests are discovered, the _ Page 6 of 16 _ • _ ® _ _ • Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring I Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance should be avoided through establishment of —an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) protocols. The temporary "no i construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. Section 5–Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the 3 archaeologist, the City of Rancho I Cucamonga will: rn Enact interim measures to protect PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. _ • Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeolo ical heritage of the area. _ • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with P/D B/C A/D Review of Section 21083.2 Archeological Review During resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse PlansConstruction project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering Page 7 of 16 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action _ for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. _ • Prepare a technical resources PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or PD B Review of report AID 4 animal. fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a 3 report of findings that will also provide specific i recommendations regarding further mitigation 00 measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate; the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained PD B Review of report A/D 4 and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 being cleared or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all PD D Review of report D 3 Page 8 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. I Im lementin AResponsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for _ -- --.�ction for Monitoring Frequence Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance recovered fossils for documentation in -- _the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of PD D Review of report D 3 Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Section 6—Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept BO C During construction A 4 according to a schedule established by the m City ,o reduce PM,o emissions associated with M vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of 00 construction. 00 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when BO C During construction A 4 wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Section 7—Greenhouse Gas Emissions — — -- Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that BO C During construction A 4 assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or repllantingdisturbed _ Page 9 of 16 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency _Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contactor shall select BO C During construction A 4 construction equipment based on low- emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more BO C During construction A 4 than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be BO C During.construction A 4 utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to BO C During construction A 4 interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be BO C During construction A 4 _ supported and encouraged for construction '+ crew. _ m 3 Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 00 1) Construction and Building materials shall be BO A During Construction C 2 produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California BO A During Construction C 2 Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows,. space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing Page 10 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for ImplementinAction _ for Monitoring-- Freq.uenc Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance shade, prevailing winds and landscaping --- - -- — - • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool' roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation - - strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho • Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape 3 Ordinance. i • Use reclaimed water for landscaping o within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and CE A Review of plans C 2 demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Section 9—Hydrology and Water Quality — — Page 11 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action_ __ _ for Monitorin Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Com liance Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering: the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 included in the Grading Plan; and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing m of grading and construction to minimize soil 3 exposure to rainy periods experienced in T' Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant _ Page 12 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible TMonitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for ImPlementinq Action — — _ for Monitori 1 f=requenc Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) -- -- — General Construction Storm Water Permit j from the State Water Resources Control i Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post Construction - Operational - 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the m structural and non-structural measures 3 consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by �► the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 1) The developer shall implement the BMPs BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Huitt- Zollars, Inc. in January 2015, to reduce construction pollutants from entering the Page 13 of 16 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Imlementing Action _ for Monitoring Fre uency_ Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Section 12–Noise Exterior 1) . Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a PD B Review of report A/D 4 construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. Interior 1) Limit construction activities to the hours of BO A During Construction C 2 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM Monday through Saturday. This mitigation measure must be M implemented throughout construction and 3 may be periodically monitored by the Planning Director, or designee during routine w inspections. 2) Stationary construction noise sources such as BO A During Construction C 2 generators or pumps must be located at least 100 feet from sensitive landuses, as feasible, or at maximum distance when necessary to complete work near sensitive land uses. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community .and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 3) Construction staging areas must be located BO A During Construction C 2 as far from noise sensitive land uses as feasible. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director I of Community and Economic Development, — or designee during routine inspections. Page 14 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitorin g rTiming of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action � 4 ______ for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Corn Hance ) Throughout construction, the contractor shall BO A During Construction C 2 ensure all construction equipment is equipped with included noise attenuating devices and are properly maintained. This mitigation measure shall be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 5) Idling equipment must be turned off when not BO A C 2 in use. This mitigation measure may be During Construction periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 6) Equipment must be maintained so that BO A During Construction C 2 vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. This mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, M __or designee during routine inspections. 7) Construction or grading shall not take place BO C During construction A 4 ko between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 8) Construction or grading noise levels shall not BO CA construction A 4 exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or Page 15 of 16 Mitigation Measures No. l Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for _Implementing Action______ _ for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance halted. 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place PO/BO C During construction A 4/7 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both.to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions '* CDD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map N 3 PD-Planning Director or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency-Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit I CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy Uli BO-Building Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds FC-Fire Chief or designee 6-Revoke CUP 7-Citation Page 16 of 1.6 RESOLUTION NO. 15-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048, A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING OF ABOUT 161,000 SQUARE FEET ON A PARCEL OF ABOUT 322,000 SQUARE FEET (7.4 ACRES) IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE FUTURE ALIGNMENT OF UTICA AVENUE BETWEEN 6TH STREET AND 7TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0209-411-36. A. Recitals. 1. RGA Office of Architectural Design, on behalf of Oakmont Industrial Group, filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2014-01048 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of May 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 27, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property generally located between 6th and 7th Streets on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue; and b. The property has an area of about 322,000 square feet (7.4 acres) and is about 607 feet (east-west) by about 512 feet (north-south); and C. The parcel is vacant and is dominated by short grasses; and d. The project site is one of three parcels that resulted from the subdivision of a property of about 25 acres that was owned by Coca-Cola and partially developed with one of their bottling facilities. That subdivision was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on December 12, 2012 (related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19397); and e. The project site is bound on the north by small industrial buildings and to the east by a logistics building with a floor area of about 175,000 square feet. To the south is an office Item 1-96 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048— RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN May 27, 2015 Page 2 complex. Along the west side of the project site will be the future alignment of Utica Avenue which currently terminates near the northwest and southwest corners of the project site. To the west, on the opposite side of the future street, is another vacant parcel (one of the other parcels of the aforementioned subdivision). At the northwest corner of.the project site is an easement of about 3,500 square feet in favor of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD); and f. The zoning of the property and all properties to the north, east, and south is General Industrial (GI) District while the zoning of the property to the west is Industrial Park (IP) District; and g. The applicant proposes to construct an industrial building of 160,980 square feet; and h. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt-up construction. The basic layout of the building will be typical for warehouse buildings. The primary(or long) axis for the building will be aligned north-south. The office area will be located at the southwest corner of the building. There will be a dock loading/storage area with 19 dock doors located on the south side of the building; and i. The parking requirement for the project, based on the proposed_mix of office and warehouse floor areas in the proposed building, is 90 parking stalls;the project will have 91 parking stalls. The trailer parking requirement, based on a ratio of one stall per dock door, is 19 parking stalls; the project will have 23-parking stalls; and j. The proposed building will have a floor area of 160,980 square feet and the project site has an area of approximately 322,000 square feet. The calculated FAR for the project will be approximately 50 percent. Per Chapter 2, Figure LU-2 Land Use Plan of the General Plan, the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) in the Industrial Park (IP) land use category is 60 percent; and k. A review and request for approval of land uses are not included in this application. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and.concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct an industrial building of 160,980 square feet. The underlying General Plan designation is General Industrial; b. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties to the north, east, and south is General Industrial (GI) District while the zoning of the property to the west is Industrial Park (IP) District; c. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the. Development Code. The proposed development complies with all standards outlined in the Development Code, and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City including building and parking setbacks, average landscape depth, floor Item 1-97 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048— RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN May 27, 2015 is Page 3 area ratio, parking, dock and storage area screening, landscape coverage, site planning, and architecture. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission furtherfinds • that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings and prior to the approving Development Review DRC2014-01048, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Environmental Mitigation • Air Quality Item 1-98 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048 — RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN May 27, 2015 Page 4 1) Prior to issuance of building permits,the project proponent shall submit,to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, a Coating Restriction Plan (CRP), consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) guidelines and a letter agreeing to include in any construction contracts and/or subcontracts a requirement that the contractors adhere to the CRP. The CRP measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of City Building Director. These may include the following: ■ That volatile organic compounds (VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 75 g/I for interior applications. ■ That volatile organic compounds (VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 75 g/I for exterior applications. This measure shall conform to the performance standard that emissions of volatile organic compounds from application of interior or exterior coatings shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District.The CRP shall specify use of High- Volume, Low Pressure. (HVLP) spray guns for application of coatings._. 2) All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three(3)times daily during dry weather.Watering,with complete coverage of disturbed areas,shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. Item 1-99 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048 — RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN May 27, 2015 • Page 5 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated • soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board[RWQCB])daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 13) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. r14) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. Item 1-100 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048— RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN May 27, 2015 Page 6 15) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 16) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 17) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 18) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 19) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 20) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 21) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 22) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 23) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. Biological Resources 1) Burrowing owl mitigation: a) Avoidance during the breeding season-Breeding season avoidance measures, including but not limited to those as follows shall be implemented. A pre-construction survey for resident burrowing owls shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within 30 days prior to construction activities. If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre-construction survey, the site will be resurveyed for owls. Pre-construction survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non- breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre-construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre-construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site,then.no further mitigation would be required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre-construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and would minimally include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. Item 1-101 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048 — RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN May 27, 2015 • Page 7 b) Burrow exclusion and/or closure during the non-breeding season - During the non-breeding season (September 1 through January 31), if burrows occupied by migratory or non-migratory resident burrowing owls are detected during a pre-construction survey, then burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. c) Nesting Birds - If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest,then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be ® required and construction could commence unimpeded. 2) Migratory Birds Mitigation: a) A preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted three (3) days prior to the commencement of vegetation removal, soil disturbance. grading, and/or construction on the project site. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) protocols. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Item 1-102 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048—RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN May 27, 2015 Page 8 • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public approximately the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-king mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management.report,documenting the inventory, evaluation,and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded,divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository(i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance Item 1-103 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048— RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN May 27, 2015 ® Page 9 with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on ® low emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: ® . Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure Item 1-104 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048 — RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN May 27, 2015 Page 10 • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available . and/or install the infrastructure to.deliver.and..use.reclai med..water.__ • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)specifically identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs)that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. Item 1-105 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048— RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN May 27, 2015 • Page 11 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction,to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed . prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City • of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Huitt-Zollars, Inc. in January 2015, to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Noise 1) Limit construction activities to the hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM Monday through Saturday. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Planning Director, or designee during routine inspections. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the • noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 3) Limit construction activities to the hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM Monday through Saturday. This mitigation measure must be implemented Item 1-106 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048— RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN May 27, 2015 Page 12 throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Planning Director, or designee during routine inspections. 4) Stationary construction noise sources such as generators or pumps must be located at least 100 feet from sensitive land uses, as feasible, or at maximum distance when necessary to complete work near sensitive land uses. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 5) Construction staging areas must be located as far from noise sensitive land uses as feasible. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 6) Throughout construction, the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with included noise attenuating devices and are property maintained. This mitigation measure shall be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 7) Idling equipment must be turned off when not in use. This mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 8) Equipment must be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. This mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 9) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 10) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards,then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 11) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would Item 1-107 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-01048— RGA OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN May 27, 2015 • Page 13 exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item 1-108 Conditions of Approval d..a. 4fNCONCommuni Develo ment 1�ttiNG.1 Community p Department Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG 1H E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: -020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planninq Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for the construction of one industrial building with a floor area of 160,980 square feet within the General Industrial (GI) District, located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street: APN: 0209-411-36. 2. Proposed land uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit as identified in Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code, shall require a separate review and approval by the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check, issuance of a Business License, and building occupancy. 3. All Double Detector Checks (We.) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each � and FDC shall require the review and approval of the • Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (Pp0 and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone to match the building. 4. All ground-mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back-flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. All ground-mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 5. The employee lunch area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the bui Idling, and tables, chairs/benches, and waste receptacles shall be provided. 6. Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 7. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. 8. All walls, including retaining walls, exposed to public view shall be constructed of decorative masonry blocks, i.e. slump stone, split-face, or have a decorative finish such as stucco. 9. Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property fine to the 25-foot setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. •10. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. Printed:5/1812015 www.CityofRC.us Item 1-109 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Plannina Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 12. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 13. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department . of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 14. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 15. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 16. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 17. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 18. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan 19. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 20. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. .Proof of this landscape, maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. www.CityofRC.us Printed.5/18/2015 Page 2 of 14 Item 1-110 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: -020941136-0000 • Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planninq Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 22. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 23. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 24. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. •25. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 26. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 27. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 28. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking" and for"employee parking only." 29. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 d13 during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. • Printed:5/18/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 14 Item 1-111 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161K SF IND BLDG/// EIS UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH. Location: -020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Deaartment Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of(the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll-up doors. e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 31. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. - - --— -- 32. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 33. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such . screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 34. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 35. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 36. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 37. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 38. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking, with a minimum of one rack with a capacity for two bicycles. 39. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other non-residential development. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5i18/2015 Page 4 of 14 Item 1-112 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 ® Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Planning ROJECT:Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 40. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 41. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 42. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 43. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 44. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. •45. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 46. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 47. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 48. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 49. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 50. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. 51. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for ® mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Printed:511812015 www.Ci yofRC.us Page 5 of 14 Item 1-113 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG///E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: -020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Utica Avenue frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "industrial Collector" standards including: a. Provide curb and gutter, a.c. pavement, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, signing and striping as required. b. Drive approaches shall have a minimum width of 35 feet and a maximum width of 50 feet, per City Std. 101, Type C. 2. Utica Avenue shall be constructed full width curb to curb, including street lights. Off-site street trees and sidewalk may be deferred until development of adjacent property. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the costs for improvements west of the centerline of Utica Avenue from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 3. Reconstruct the missing portion of the existing drive approach to City Standards located south of the southerly property line of the development. 4. Transitions to existing curb and gutter on the north and south project boundaries on Utica Avenue shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. The Utica Avenue acceptance of offer of street dedication shall be processed concurrent with the acceptance of Improvement Agreement and bonds. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 7. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 8. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 14 Printed:5/16/2015 Item 1-114 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 ® Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. 10. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. ell. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Utica Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees • Printed:5/18/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 14 Item 1-115 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: -020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the. issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes. shall be _.installed with any...new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be. installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 13. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Printed:5/18/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 14 Item 1-116 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 • Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Utica Avenue Botanical Name- Brachychiton populneus Common Name - Bottle Tree Min. Grow Space -6' Spacing - 35' 0.C. Size - 15 gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. • 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 15. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 16. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 17. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 18. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 19. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit Printed:5118/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 14 Item 1-117 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: -020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. 2. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 4. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event 'of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 5. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance .of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of. the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 6. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 8. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 9. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 10. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 '/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 11. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. Printed:5/18/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 14 Item 1-118 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG /// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: -020941136-0000 '• Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Fire ROJECT:Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and • g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 3. Contractors must show proof. of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. 6. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC . 7. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 8. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 9. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 10. Roofing materials shall be Class "A." 11. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 12. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 13. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. Printed:5/18/2015 www.CityofR C.us Page 11 of 14 Item 1-119 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: -020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant .shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. www.0tyofRC.us Printed:5/18/2015 Page 12 of to Item 1-120 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 • Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 11. The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 12. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 13. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 15. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 16. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed -to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 17. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. •18. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 19. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 20. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector: b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the • functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. Printed:5/18/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 14 Item 1-121 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG///E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 23. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 24. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 25. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 26. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Utica Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 27. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 28. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 29. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property, boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 30. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 31. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 32. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. Printed:5/18/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 14 df 14 Item 1-122 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date:' May 27, 2015 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: OJerry A. Dyer, Principal Civil Engineer Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that by minute action the Planning Commission find the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2015/16 in conformity with the adopted General Plan. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as attached as Exhibit "B" is required per Government Code 65401, Exhibit "A", to be adopted by the City Council. The Planning Commission is required to find the CIP in conformity with the adopted General Plan. The CIP document includes a General Plan Policies section that evidences the specific policy references found in the General Plan. The CIP is a vital piece of the City's Annual Operating Budget as it dictates major capital expenditures obligated in any given year. The CIP consists of a multi-year plan for citywide infrastructure improvements. Each year, the City budgets for"funded"projects which will occur during said fiscal year. The list of projects contained in the CIP addresses both the City's long and short-term capital needs. It identifies projects that reflect the desires of the community, as well as projects that serve operational and maintenance needs. The City's Engineering staff works with all Departments within the City to develop and implement an economically feasible CIP that embodies the City's public infrastructure needs. The CIP is the product of joint planning, taken from the City's General Plan, local residents, the business community, the local development community, and external government agencies. The projects have been categorized by type of project (Beautification, Drainage, Facilities, etc.), which are in alphabetical order within each category. The individual project sheets include a short summary, cost, year funded, and a map showing the project location. Projects are funded from a variety of sources including Development Impact Fees, Measure "I", Gas Tax, and miscellaneous grants. There are 72 projects totaling just over $53,000,000 to be executed in the upcoming fiscal year. Apart from the 72 projects previously identified, 26 projects just over $75,000,000 are identified as future and unfunded. :4tted, �C. nainee Dirring Services/City Engineer Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Government Code 65401 Exhibit "B" - Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Capital Improvement Program (distributed under separate cover) /9 Re— "/7 Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCA.MONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161K SF IND BLDG /// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: -020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for the construction of one industrial building with a floor area of 160,980 square feet within the General Industrial (GI) District, located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street; APN: 0209-411-36. 2. Proposed land uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit as identified in Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code, shall require a separate review and approval by the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check, issuance of a Business License, and building occupancy. 3. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone to match the building. 4. All ground-mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back-flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. All ground-mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 5. The employee lunch area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the bui Idling, and tables, chairs/benches, and waste receptacles shall be provided. 6. Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 7. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. 8. All walls, including retaining walls, exposed to public view shall be constructed of decorative masonry blocks, i.e. slump stone, split-face, or have a decorative finish such as stucco. 9. Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property fine to the 25-foot setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. 10. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. Printed:5!27/2015 www.CityofRC.us T Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG///E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 12. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 13. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 14. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 15. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 16. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 17. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 18. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan 19. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 20. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. www.CityofRC.us Printed'5/27/2015 Page 2 of 14 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Planning- ROJECT:Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 22. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 23. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 24. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 25. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 26. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 27. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking"and for"employee parking only." 28. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 29. Provide a trash enclosure(s) designed per the City's standard drawing for Industrial Projects. 30. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 31. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. Printed:5/27/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 14 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 32. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 33. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 34. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 35. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 36. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 37. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking, with a minimum of one rack with a capacity for two bicycles. 38. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other non-residential development. 39. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 40. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way .on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 41. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees- 24-inch box or larger. 42. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/27/2015 Page 4 of 14 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG///E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 43. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 44. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 45. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 46. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 47. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 48. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance .of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 49. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. 50. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Utica Avenue frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Industrial Collector" standards including: a. Provide curb and gutter, a.c. pavement, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, signing and striping as required. b. Drive approaches shall have a minimum width of 35 feet and a maximum width of 50 feet, per City Std. 101, Type C. Printed:5/27/2015 www.QtyofRC.us Page 5 of 14 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. Utica Avenue shall be constructed full width curb to curb, including street lights. Off-site street trees and sidewalk may be deferred until development of adjacent property. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the costs for improvements west of the centerline of Utica Avenue from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 3. Reconstruct the missing portion of the existing drive approach to City Standards located south of the southerly property line of the development. 4. Transitions to existing curb and gutter on the north and south project boundaries on Utica Avenue shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. The Utica Avenue acceptance of offer of street dedication shall be processed concurrent with the . acceptance of Improvement Agreement and bonds. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 7. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 8. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 9. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. Printed:5/27/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 14 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: -020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 11. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Utica Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/27/2015 Page 7 of 14 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: -020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Improvement Plans and Construction: a: Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 13. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Printed:5/27/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 14 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Deuartment Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Utica Avenue Botanical Name- Brachychiton populneus Common Name- Bottle Tree Min. Grow Space- 6' Spacing- 35' 0.C. Size- 15 gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 15. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 16. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 17. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 18. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 19. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Printed:5/27/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 14 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. 2. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 4. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 5. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 6. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 8. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 9. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, 'Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 10. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 '/2" x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 11. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed .sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the Califomia Fire Code. Printed:5/27/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 14 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. 6. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC . 7. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 8. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 9. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 10. Roofing materials shall be Class "A." 11. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 12. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 13. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. Printed:5/27/2015 Www•CityofRC.us Page 11 of 14 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Deaartment Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. Printed:5/27/2015 www.Qty0fRC.us Page 12 of 14 ,Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161 K SF IND BLDG N E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 11. The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 12. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 13. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 15. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 16. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 17. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 18. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 19. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 20. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading -operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. www .CityofRC.us Printed:5!27/2015 Page 13 of 14 Project#: DRC2014-01048 CEQA2014-00026 Project Name: 161K SF IND BLDG/// E/S UTICA, BETWEEN 7TH AND 6TH Location: - 020941136-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 23. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 24. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 25. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 26. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Utica Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 27. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 28. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 29. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 30. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 31. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 32. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and priorr to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/27/2015 Page 14 of 14 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-01048 Page 46 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. r J SISI / Applicant's Signature: Date: Print Name and Title: + L) Rev 4-7-15 ou Fgcco,e-ac. �Py City of Sixty6 Sports Lounge Six Month Review for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DRC2012-00057 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT - DRC2012-00058 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (MODIFICATION ) - DRC2014-00774 city • A ®II .. L r] CUCAM (.4 Project Overview • CUP DRC2012-00057 and EP DRC2012-00058 for the operation of the business approved on July 12, 2012 • CUP(Modification) DRC2014-00774 to expand hours and open earlier approved on September 24, 2014 • CUP2014-00774 included a requirement for a 6-month review 1 A' ® ya --iii f If i : R r J. . i ,. V+ •O 1 i 14 ra, 11 �yCLi ji F �a P f .def `P '! yo, K j_- w 1! L Floor Plan ~- �•• .- �� gena �.." 1a-1.�'�,L'..'tL�1U I +Y.� . . — I Public Safety • Ten ( 10) calls-for-service by the Sherriff's Department from October 1 , 2014 to April 30 , 2015 • Calls-for-service included one fight, four calls for public intoxication and 5 calls for false alarms • Calls considered below average for size of business • Sherriff's Department finds the business to be well operated and not a burden of public services RANCtfO. _._ Staff Visits & Meeting • Staff visited the business on 3 occasions and found the business to be in compliance with the approved entitlements except for the doors to the business being open on one visit. • Staff met the applicant on April 21 , 2015 to discuss Staff and Sherriff's Department site visits. • Main outstanding issue was the doors to the business being kept open when entertainment was available. Applicant stated that this issue is resolved and doors are now closed when required . City t�f ` Q ♦ •' Recommendation Staff finds that the business is being operated in compliance with Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057, Entertainment Permit DRC2012- 00058 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2014-00774 ( Modification) and that an additional 6-month review is not necessary at this time. Staff asks that the Planning Commission provide comment and direction as appropriate, and that the Planning Commission Secretary receive and file the report. a _ �f� F ACC(IRd Planning Commission AMOWA"IfO . IA May 27, 2015 Time Extension DRC2015-00244 for Development Review DRC2007-00696 - A request to extend the duration of an existing entitlement approval by an additional one year for an industrial warehouse/office project comprised of two buildings with a combined floor area of about 100,000 square feet on a parcel of about (4.87 acres) within the General Industrial District, located at 9212 Hermosa Avenue - APN : 0209-211 -41 . DRC2015-00244 A'wc Background • The original entitlement, Development Review DRC2007-00696 , was approved by the Planning Commission on May 14, 2008 ; • A prior Time Extension ( DRC2013-00326) request was approved by the Planning Commission on June 26 , 2013 that extended the duration of the entitlement approval by two years to from May 14, 2013 to May 14, 2015; y • 1 1 1 K.3•. � f' ry MOW d , �tMr_i 6 t`r r ° . . 1.0 r �' y _ - Hermosa Avenue T ...�...� . x_.� r• �^.� -rte'., � �- + rd FA dk i yy.:,.g�a .§A JU tl■ - 6 1 � 'r. F� n , � �4 � f`r:Y7�..i �.vra�'—�tj��ali•s �: �.� • .f.'ti —. !!•��'!E IIP II R*•!C:' ._ : ;',�ji�1 UM . � 'jCD W11 . • I tljokL�l 11 lot r • : . and Hwmosa Rancho r- •'. . 7WOO DRC2015-00244 R_W1-O Environmental Assessment YA },l�t(7gtil�s • The Planning Commission determined that the original project was categorically exempt under Section 15315 — "Minor Land Divisions" and Section 15332 - " In-Fill Development Projects" ; • Pursuant to Section 15162 - no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. .- DRC2015-00244 meati? Conclusion Approval of this time extension will extend the duration of the approval of the subject entitlement by one year to May 14, 2016. Staff Recommends Approval of: Time Extension for DRC2015-00244 through the adoption of the Resolution of Approval . won RANCHOPlanning Commission U( ANIONGA May 27 , 2015 ALWORNIA Development Review DRC2014-01048 — A proposal to construct an industrial building of about 161 ,000 square feet on a parcel of about 322,000 square feet (7.4 acres) in the General Industrial (GI) District located on the east side of the future alignment of Utica Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street; APN : 0209-411 -36. The area of the project site is 7.4 acres 607 feet (east to west) x 512 feet (north to south) =` Industrial Buildings _y Vacant _<,, Project Site Logistics Buildingtot— I Industrial Office � �' '90WFNNNII@�F�IXiOuipbu Fi 3 N 1 { y il. AIL �I F It J D $ "' ca Ey': � a Q C Y � L N = Aerial Overview v r � yyamY• g , + r \ i Project Site � All At 44 _ {�a rn� s' + • _ 4 Ar 1,ir - s`� M - -.c° vo- .{ •11'fiT 031-. s o�n�1° -='o "r t � I F __- _. R 3 .��3 . ..- �,. r -�. -.. _ •°j 'nE� - yrY��T�(y dtx;,Yckl!� Cucamonga Valley Water District Facility (On-Site) AlO Twsa" "oy4' m o" y Development Review J DRC2014-01048 RANCHO U( ANIONGA Project Description CALIFORNIA • The applicant proposes to construct a logistics building of 160 , 980 square feet; • The office area will be located at the southwest corner of the building while the dock area with 19 dock doors will be located on the south side of the building , • There will be two points of access — one via driveways at the southwest and northwest corners, respectively, of the project site . CVWD Facility Access ` 3j .�T VJ 'I9� SF � Com_ tib♦ �,.:II tF .\ µ I 1 i v Dock Area Access \ `� qffice L-4 - � ves�ar�aow+wx��w mnrmw-- - — ,IH asrN. North LIGHT INC JITIML LIGHT INIIDMAIL — "Cf1I, 111',f{,i i Development Review RA.�eH° DRC2014-01048 U( AMONGA CALIFORNIA (continued) • The proposed building will be of concrete tilt-up construction painted with a palette of several colors: • There will be form-lined concrete , and metal accents at the office area ; and • Generous amounts of blue-tinted glass have been provided at the office area and at various locations along the wall planes of the building that are most visible. .gam 0 Now, NORTHWEST CORNER WEST ELEVATION fYI W'/Y YYkrN'YY aaaw.ai w d e.es r • ry • { ,� ❑ � ' SOUTH ELEVATION -- EAST ELEVATION F'lI1 NE'1Y M LL77 - - LA Al - - - NORTN ELEVATION .-„,•.. DRC 701401048 DRC2014-01048 RANCHO Environmental Assessment • Initial Study was prepared that analyzed the potential environmental effects of the project; • Based on the findings, it was determined that, with mitigation measures incorporated to address impacts there is no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. • A Mitigated Negative Declaration ( MND) was prepared , and public notice for comment and of the intent to adopt the MND was provided ; • No comments were received from the public or agencies during this review period . b J' [ I DRC2014-01048 RANcHo Public Notification CUCAMONGA ? CALIFORNIA • This item was duly advertised as a public hearing and no comments were received by Staff in response to the public notifications. Conclusion • Staff Recommends Approval of Development Review DRC2014-01048 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Fiscal Year 2015/2oi6 Capital Improvement Program Presented by: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Tel: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 www.cityofrc.com CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 SUMMARY Categories Budgeted Unfunded General Plan: Policy Reference A. Beautification........................... (4) $ 872,000 $ - GP: CM-3.11,PS-12.7 B. Drainage.................................. (1) $ 60,000 $ - GP: CM-4.4, CM-3.7 C. Facilities................................... (18) $ 30,497,000 $ 20,750,000 GP: ED-3.1, PF-1.1, PF-1.4, PF-1.5 D. Miscellaneous.......................... (5) $ 959,570 $ - GP: CM-1.4, CM-2.1, CM-3.7, CS-6.3, LU-11.2, PS-12.4 E. Municipal Utility.................... (5) $ 1,001,000 $ - GP: PF-1.4, RC4.2 F. Parks........................................ (5) $ 3,964,360 $ 3,597,500 GP: CS-1.8, PF-1.4 G. Railroad Crossings.................. (3) $ 1,175,000 $ - GP: CM-1.2, CM-4.4 H. Streets..........................:.......... (25) $ 13,492,805 $ 6,144,000 GP: CM-1.1, CM-2.1, CM-4.4, ED4.3 I. Traffic....................................... (6) $ 1,385,310 $ - GP: CM-4.1, CM-4.2 TOTAL............................... (72) $ 53,407,045 $ 30,491,500 J. Future & Unfunded Projects.... (26) $ 75,202,590 GP: CM-1.1, CM-4.4, CS-1.8, ED-3.1, PS-12.4 1 I Index CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 No. Project Fund Account Amount(S) A Beautification I 1 Foothill BIW from San Bernardino Rd to Vineyard Ave-Median Landscape Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1908198-0 80,000 2 LMD 4R-Water Conservation and Landscape Renovations LMD 4R 11343035650/1787134-0 392,000 (Multi-Phased Project) I 3 Metrolink Station along Azusa CT and Anaheim PL-Street Trees LMD 3B 11333035650/1923133-0 200,000 4 Metrolink Station at Milliken Ave -Enhancement for entrance to the station LMD 3B 11333035650/1924133-0 200,000 ' Beautification UnFunded Total: 0 Beautification Funded Total: 872,000 B. Drainage 1 Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria Park Lane-Drainage Improvement General Drainage 11123035650/1874112-0 60,000 ' Drainage UnFunded Total: 0 Drainage Funded Total: 60,000 C. Facilities 1 Animal Care and Adoption Center-Makeover Project Capital Reserve 1025001-5650/1920025-0 850,000 2 Archibald Library Office Re-design Library Reserve 1329601-5602 5,000 3 Central Park-Emergency Backup Power Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1914288-0 50,000 4 Civic Center-Council Chambers AV Replacement Phase II Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 200,000 5 Civic Center-Elevator Control Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 77,000 6 Civic Center-Landscape Renovation Capital Reserve 1025001-5607 250,000 7 Civic Center-Office Relocations Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 310,000 8 Civic Center-Roof Restoration/Patio Replacement Capital Reserve 1025001-5650/1892025-0 730,000 9 Civic Center-Water Tower Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 300,000 10 Fire District-Central Station 178(New Fire Station) Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1645288-0 1,400,000 Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1645288-0 9,000,000 10,400,000 11 Fire District-Jersey Station 174 Training Facility Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1735288-0 21,000,000 12 Fire District-San Bernardino Rd Station 172 Relocation Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1733288-0 800,000 Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1733288-0 6,500,000 7,300,000 ' 13 Fire District-Water Conservation Landscaping Fire Capital Projects 3288501-5602 600,000 14 Paul A.Biane Library-2nd Floor Rancho KIDS Project Library Capital Fund 13296015650/1867329-0 2,500,000 (Construction funded FYI 5/16 to FY17/18-multi-phased) Library Capital Fund 13296015650/1867329-0 4,550.000 I7,050,000 15 Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center-Relocation Park Development 11204015650/1896120-0 1,300,000 16 Sports Complex-Family Restroom Park Development 11203055650/1911120-0 70,000 I I I IIndex-1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 ' No. Project Fund Account Amount($) 17 Victoria Gardens Cultural Center-Courtyard Redesign Capital Reserve 10250015650/1894025-0 25,000 CFD 2003-01 16153035650/1894615-0 5,000 ' Unknown n00000000a/1894xxx 400.000 430,000 18 Victoria Gardens Cultural Center-Loading Bay Capital Reserve 10250015650/1895025-0 25,000 Unknown n000000000J1895xxx 300.000 ' 325,000 Facilities UnFunded Total: 20,750,000 Facilities Funded Total: 30,497,000 D. Miscellaneous ' 1 ADA Ramps at Various Locations Measure 1 11773035650/1150177-0 100,000 (Design and Construction) ' 2 Base Line Rd Utility Underground-Carnelian St to Vineyard Ave Underground Utilities 11293035650/1776129-0 554,570 3 Cucamonga Creek Channel Fencing Construction Capital Reserve 1025001-5607 28,000 4 Deer Creek Channel Fencing Construction Capital Reserve 1025001-5607 12,000 ' 5 Metrolink Station Parking Lot Resurfacing LMD 3B 11333035650/1919133-0 265,000 Miscellaneous UnFunded Total: 0 Miscellaneous Funded Total: 959,570 ' E. Municipal Utility-Electrical 1 6th St at Utica Ave-Line Extension Municipal Utility 17053035650/1918705-0 236,000 ' 2 Day Creek Blvd and Base Line Road-Line Extension Municipal Utility 17053035650/1917705-0 200,000 3 Distribution System Automation Municipal Utility 17053035650/1916705-0 250,000 4 Fiber Optics Assessment Municipal Utility 17053035650/1910705-0 150,000 ' 5 Solar Carport Expansion-Civic Center Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 165,000 Municipal Utility UnFunded Total: 0 ' Municipal Utility Funded Total: 1,001,000 F. Parks 1 Central Park-Trail Head Improvements Park Development 11203055650/1871120-0 40,000 Unknown v000000000d1871xxx-0 997.500 ' 1,037,500 2 Garcia Park-ADA Swing Bay and Rubberized Surface Lower Etiwanda 11393035650/1913139-0 40,000 3 Los Amigos Park-New Park Prop 84 State Grant 12353055650/1754235-0 3,539,360 ' (Continuation of Design and Construction) 4 Red Hill Park Lake Modernization Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1897198-0 295,000 5 Sports Complex-Artificial Turf at 2 soccer fields Capital Reserve 1025001-5650/1915025-0 50,000 ' Capital Reserve 1025001-5650/1915025-0 2,600,000 2,650,000 Parks UnFunded Total: 3,597,500 ' Parks Funded Total: 3,964,360 G. Railroad Crossings 1 6th St at BNSF Spur Crossing west of Etiwanda Avenue Transportation 11243035650/1839124-0 50,000 (Preliminary Design and Cost Estimates) ' 2 Arrow Route at Railroad Spur-New Concrete Panels Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1819174-0 75,000 (Continuation of Design with Construction funded) 3 Hellman Avenue at Metrolink Tracks-Widen Crossing Transportation 11243035650/1847124-0 400,000 (Continuation of Design with Construction funded) Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1847198-0 650.000 1,050,000 Railroad Crossings UnFunded Total: 0 Railroad Crossings Funded Total: 1,175,000 Index-2 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 No. Project Fund Account Amount(S) H. Streets ' 1 4th St from Archibald to Haven-North Side Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11763035650/1853176-0 392,000 Note: possible CalRecycle Rebate 2 7th St from Hellman to Archibald-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1876174-0 309,000 Note: possible CalRecycle Rebate ' 3 9th St from Grove to,Hellman-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1904174-0 25,000 (Design with Construction funded FY 16/17) Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1904174-0 300.000 Note: possible CalRecycle Rebate 325,000 4 Archibald Ave from 4th to Foothill-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1852177-0 1,100,000 Note: possible CalRecycle Rebate 5 Archibald Ave from Hillside to North City Limit-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1727177-0 355,000 Note: possible CalRecycle Rebate 6 Arrow Route along the s/s 500'to 1300'e/o 1-15 freeway-Widening Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1907174-0 20,000 (Design with Construction funded FY 16/17) Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1907174-0 300.000 320,000 7 Base Line Rd-at 1-15 Interchange Transportation 11243035650/1361124-0 250,000 (Continuation of Construction) SAFE-LU(Federal) 3,951,805 Prop 1 B-SLPP(State) 1.000.000 5,201,805 8 Base Line Rd from Milliken to w/o Day Creek Blvd-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1880177-0 30,000 (Design with Construction funded FY 16/17) Measure 1 11773035650/1880177-0 900.000 Note: possible CalRecycle Rebate 930,000 ' 9 Camelian St from Lemon Ave to Wilson Ave-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 1177303565011722177-0 468,000 (Continuation of Design with Construction funded) 10 Church St from Pepper to Hellman-Pavement Rehabilitation. Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1906174-0 25,000 I (Design with Construction funded FY 16/17) Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1906174-0 322.000 Note: possible CalRecycle Rebate 347,000 11 Etiwanda Ave Street Improvements from 6th St to Arrow Route Transportation 11243035650/1076124-0 225,000 (Design with Construction) Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1076198-0 225.000 450,000 12 Foothill Blvd across SCE Corridor West of Day Creek Channel-Sidewalk Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1826198-0 145,000 Improvements(Design and Construction) ' 13 Foothill Blvd from Archibald to Haven-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1881177-0 30,000 Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1881198-0 677.000 707,000 14 Foothill Blvd from Vineyard to Archibald-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1855177-0 611,000 Note: possible CalRecycle Rebate 15 Haven Ave from Banyan to Wilson along the East side-sidewalk Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1864174-0 220,000 (Design and Construction) 16 Haven Ave from Wilson to North City Limit-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1854177-0 480,000 Note: possible CalRecycle Rebate ' 17 Hellman Ave from San Bernardino Rd to Base Line Rd-Pavement Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1905174-0 25,000 Rehabilitation(Design with Construction funded FY 16/17) Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1905174-0 322.000 Note: possible CalRecycle Rebate 347,000 I 18 Hillside Rd from Archibald to Haven-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1879174-0 25,000 (Design with Construction funded FY 16/17) Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1879174-0 850.000 Note: possible CalRecycle Rebate 875,000 19 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation at Various Locations Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1022174-0 850,000 I (Design and Construction) General 10013075650/1022001-0 400.000 1,250,000 20 Madrone Ave North of 9th St-Widening with Southwest Cucamonga Park Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1818174-0 125,000 (Continuation of Design with Construction funded) IIndex-3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2015116 No. Project Fund Account Amount($) 21 San Bernardino Rd from Carnelian to Archibald-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1877174.0 175,000 (Construction) Fire Protection Capital 32885015650/1877288-0 175.000 350,000 22 San Bernardino Rd from Grove to Foothill-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1903174-0 104,000 (Construction) 23 Spruce Ave from Foothill to Base Line-Pavement Rehabilitation Citywide Infrastructure .11963035650/1878198-0 600,000 (Construction)Note: possible CalRecycle Rebate 24 Victoria Street from Etiwanda to East City Limit-Widening and Pavement Measure 1 11773035650/1838177-0 375,000 Rehabilitation(Continuation of Design with Construction funded) 25 Youngs Canyon Road from Koch Place to Cherry Ave-Street Extension AD 88-2 Etiwanda/Highlnd 18133035650/1601813-0 100,000 (Environmental,conceptual design and Flood Control basins review/study) AD 88-2 Etiwanda/Highlnd 18133035650/1601813-0 3.150,000 3,250,000 Streets UnFunded Total: 6,144,000 Streets Funded Total: 13,492,805 I. Trak 1 6th St at Utica Ave-Traffic Signal Installation Transportation 11243035650/1889124-0 287,500 2 Base Line Rd/Lion St-Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Transportation 11243035650/1921124-0 100,000 3 Carnelian St at Banyan St-Traffic Signal Installation Transportation 11243035650/1887124-0 280,000 4 Freeway and Arterial Signal Synchronization at various intersections AB 2766 Air Quality 11053035650/1900105-0 112,810 where City streets intersect SR 210 and 1-15-Phase 1 Transportation 11243035650/1900124-0 205.000 317,810 5 Intelligent Transportation System Upgrade-Citywide Transportation 11243035650/1831124-0 300,000 6 Milliken Ave Traffic Signals-Upgrade Left Turn Phases at Mountain View, Transportation 11243035650/1875124-0 100,000 Terra Vista Parkway and Vintage Drive Traffic UnFunded Total: 0 Traffic Funded Total: 1,385,310 I Index-4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2015116 No. Project Fund Account Amount(S) J. Future&Unfunded Projects 1 6th St east of Haven-Line Extension Municipal Utility 17053035650/)x=705-0 760,000 2 Archibald Ave from Church to Palo Alto-Storm Drain Unknown )0000000000d1805xxx-0 1,215,000 3 Archibald Ave from N/O Norbrook to Carrari St-Community Trail West Side Unknown )000v000000d1830xxx-0 103,000 (Continuation of Design,with Construction FY16/17 if funds are available) 4 Arrow Route Utility Underground-Bear Gulch to West of Archibald Ave Underground Utilities 1129303565011777129-0 719,360 (Continuation of Design with Construction funded FY17/18) ' 5 Bus Stop Pads at Various Locations Gas Tax R&T 7360 1174303565011823174-0 19,000 (Design and Construction funded FY 16/17 if grant funds available) Ped Grant Article 3 12143035650/1823214-0 76.000 95,000 6 Etiwanda Ave Grade Separation at Metrolink Tracks Unknown m000000000d1922xxx-0 40,000,000 7 Etiwanda Ave Line Extension from Arrow to Foothill Municipal Utility 17053035650/1885705-0 602,500 8 Etiwanda Creek Park-Phase II Park Development 11203055650/1664120-0 5,580,000 9 Fire District-Operation/Dispatch Building Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1392288-0 11,000,000 10 Foothill Blvd from Grove Ave to San Bernardino Rd-Widening with Median Unknown )0000000000J1189xxx-0 4,630,000 Island including Landscaped Median to Vineyard (Right-of-Way and Construction) 11 Haven Ave from Wilson to Vivienda-Community Trail on the West Side Beautification 11103165650/1829110-0 126,000 (Continuation of Design with Construction funded) 12 Hermosa Ave from Banyan to Wilson-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1815174-0 260,000 (Continuation of Design,with Construction FY16/17 if funds are available) Related to Hermosa storm drain 13 Hermosa Ave from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson-Storm Drain Unknown :000000000(x/1810xxx-0 2,245,000 Related to Hermosa pavement rehabilitation 14 Lemon Ave from Archibald to Haven-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 1174303565011793174-0 560,000 (Continuation of Design,with Construction FY17118 if funds are available) Related to Lemon storm drain 15 Lemon Avenue from Haven to 1300 feet west-Storm Drain Unknown x)0000000aod1791xxx-0 1,700,000 Related to Lemon pavement rehabilitation 16 LMD 2(Victoria)Area-Paseo Lighting Repair and Replace LMD 2 Victoria 11313035650/1716131-0 150,000 17 Miller Ave at East Ave-New Traffic Signal Installation Transportation 11243035650/1888124-0 300,000 18 Pacific Electric Trail at Pepper Street-Drainage Improvement General Drainage 11123035650/1901112-0 90,000 19 Pacific Electric Trail Enhancements-West to East City Limits Beautification 11103165650/1775110-0 10,000 Citywide Infrastructure 1198303565011775198-0 100.000 110,000 20 Red Hill Park-Pedestrian Paseo PD 85 Redemption 18483035650/1621848-0 100,000 21 Rochester from Foothill Blvd to Base Line Rd-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1821177-0 590,000 (Continuation of Design,with Construction funded FY16/17) 22 Route 66 Trailhead at Foothill and Highridge-Drainage Improvement General Drainage 11123035650/1912112-0 30,000 23 Safety Lighting-Upgrades at Various Intersections Transportation 11243035650/1842124-0 150,000 24 Terra Vista Parkway at Spruce-Safety Lighting Installation Transportation 11243035650/1902124-0 130,000 25 Upper Cucamonga Storm Drain Phase III-East of Hellman to Base Line to Unknown Unknown 3,900,000 Roberds,North on Amethyst to 19th St,and Easterly 300 feet 26 Victoria Arbors Park(LMD 2)-Park Playground Rubberized Surface Maint. LMD 2 Victoria 1131303-5300 56,730 Future&Unfunded Total: 75,202,590 Index-5 err' Beautification Typical Beautification projects include parkway landscape, median islands, plant material replacement, community trail landscape and open space preservation. The City strives to plan and budget for projects that exemplify Rancho Cucamonga's aesthetic standards, particularly in areas of the City that are older and undergoing rehabilitation. Many Beautification projects bring these areas into alignment with the rest of the City. The City adheres to a Xeriscape policy in all of its plant material selection, ensuring current water conservation stand- ards, as well as the adaptability of plants, trees, flowers and shrubs to Southern California's warm and dry climate. This practice helps to reduce ongoing maintenance and irrigation costs. Project List & FY 2015-16 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2015-16 I. Foothill Blvd: San Bernardino Rd— $80,000 $80.000 Vineyard/Median Landscape $400 ppp 2. LMD 4R Water Conservation and $392,000 Landscape Renovations 3. Metrolink Station:Azusa Ct& $200,000 Anaheim PI-Street Trees 4. Metrolink Station @ Milliken- $200,000 Entrance Enhancement Total $872,000 $392,000 Citywide Infrastructure ■LIVID 3B ■LIVID 411 A Project Number: 800-2015-03 JL Key: 1908 Object: Foothill Boulevard from San Bernardino Road to Vineyard Avenue- Median Landscape Project Location: 47, Foothill Boulevard from San Bernardino Road to Vineyard r Avenue RED HILL C OLI NTR�U kiB j r Est.Construction Start/End: .7:. RED HILL I CL,.B 01/2016 k6JIeCt LOCATION —02/2016 6 Project Status: ......... ..... .........-------- Design/Construction Department; Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings L Description: Install drought tolerant trees, mulch, and drip irrigation within the Foothill Boulevard median, from San Bernardino Road to Vineyard Avenue. Justification: Install drought tolerant trees and mulch will beautify existing barren median as well as reduce weed abatement and dust control. Project Cost Estimate I,: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 so $0 $0 $0 so $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 Right-of-Way $.0 so $0 so $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $80,000 so $0 $0 $0 580,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 so so so so so $0 Total Costs: so $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Infrastructure Fund(198) $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $80,000 Total Costs; $0 $80,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Impact on Operations: Increased maintenance operations costs for water and tree trimming. Minor cost savings from reduced weed abatement. A , Project Number: JL Key: 1787 Object: LMD 4-Water Conservation/Landscape Renovation Study Project Location: LIVID 4 L M J�LL)PAC61�GL T)t 4� UL, i n L: L -, 1[3 J) ICT UZI iM Est.Construction Start/End- -41! in I July 2015—June 2016 jBi j" []F11 It :L Ljjp�:Q j IL Project Status: i ITO ORWECT-LOCATION Construction U0. F L LIC L =F Department: A Public Works Services L Project Manager: Dean Rodia Description: The replacement of thirsty high maintenance turf and vegetation with low water use landscaping that meets the need to conserve resources,reduce maintenance costs,while providing landscape alternatives to the surrounding community. Justification: The new landscaping wil reduce maintenance costs and water use requirements. Project Cost Estimate Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o so so $0 so so $0 Design/Plan Review $27,560 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,560 Right-of-Way so $0 $0 so $0 $0 so Construction $360,000 $356,400 so $0 $0 $0 $716,400 Inspection&Administration $4,000 $0 $o $0 so $o $4,000 Contingency $36,000 $35,600 so $o so $0 $71,600 Total Costs: $427,560 5392,000 $0 so $o $0 $819,560 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019 20 TOTAL LIVID 411 Terra Vista(134) $427,560 $392,000 50 $o $0 so $819,560 Total Costs: $427,560 $392,000 so $0 so so $819,560 Impact on Operations: There will be disruptions when the existing landscaping is removed and new landscaping installed. However, once completed,maintenance and irrigation costs will be much lower. A2 Project Number: JL Key: 1923 Ohject: Metrolink Station along Azusa Court and Anaheim Place Street Trees Project Location: ....._ .ILL.._.�Ic I ! 1— C_ Metrolink Station FIRE STATIpN -A N w ; PROJECT LOCATION RAIIROAD E.T.ROLINK STATION Est.Construction Start/End: 01/2016-02/2016 Project Status: w EMPIRE LAKES GOLF CGU RS iia I Jam—J Design/Construction ✓ 7_TH SJ l-k Department: � I� r Engineering I= a Project Manager: Iii `I II t �✓ GTM iC�^ ATH ST Curt Billings so .c Description: This project involves the planting of a regular pattern of street trees along Azusa Court and Anaheim Place at the Metrolink Station. Justification: This project will create more of a sense of place for the station, as well as provide shade, enhance circulation and strenthen connectivity to the major arterials. Project Cost Estimate($�: _Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0' $0 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review 50 $0 50 50 50 50 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 50 $0 $0 50 $0 ' Construction $0 $180,000 $0 $o $0 50 $180,000 Inspection&Administration $o $o $0 So $0 50 5p Contingency 50' $20,000 $0 50 $0 50 $20,000 Total Costs: $0 $200,000 $0 50 50 $0 $200,000 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016 17 �_ 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL LMD 3B(133) $0 $200,000 $0 $0 S0 50 $200,000 Total Costs: $0 $200,000 50 50 $0 $0 $200,000 Impact on Operations: Should be minimal as the trees will be drought tolerant and low maintenance. I A3 Project Number: 1L Key: 1924 ' Object: Metrolink Station at Milliken Avenue Enhancement ' Project Location: Metrolink Station at Milliken FIRE STATION Avenue entrance 174 ROJECT/LOCATION RAILRO D - METROLINK STATIC;N, lam' Est.Construction Start/End: SQ• _ 01/2016—02/2016 NFyl�=ciR 7 tilt Ip r• ��' YTOP J Project Status: EMPIRE LAKES GOLF COURSE � [ Design/Construction Department: Engineering � W Project Manager: 6TH ST Curt Billings "T"ST Description: This project involves the construction of a large scale signature sculptural statement and/or gateway marker such as statement Palm Trees and enhanced decorative paving at Milliken Avenue and the entrance to the Metrolink Station ' Justification: This project will establish a sense of place by creating a dramatic first impression of the entry and gateway to the station. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 1 50 SO SO $0 SO $D Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $D 50 50 SO Right-of-Way $0 50 $0 So 50 $o 50 Construction 50 $180,000 $0 50 $0 50 $180,000 Inspection&Administration 5o $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $o Contingency $0 $20,000 So 50 $0 SO $20,000 Total Costs: $0 $200,000 50 $0 50 $0 $200,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 L — 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL LIVID 3B(133) $0 $200,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 I Total Costs: $0 $200,000 50 S0 $D $O $200,000 Impact on Operations: Should be minimal as any landscaping or trees will be drought tolerant and low maintenance,and any decorative items designed for a long life expectancy. I I A4 nll I I Drainage Drainage projects include the construction of new storm drains, storm drain lateral connections, flood control channels, catch basins, debris racks and other forms of infrastructure that protect the public right-of-way from hazards caused by flooding and severe weather events. Drainage projects are scheduled and planned due to the availability of funding, safety concerns, new development, and weather/emergency events. In extreme circumstances, inadequate drainage can prevent development from taking place. The City consults with many other agencies when constructing new drainage improvements, including utility companies, the Cucamonga Valley Water District, the San Bernardino Flood Control District and the Army Corps of Engineers, as needs dictate. Drainage projects are typically funded from Drainage Funds and eligible street funding sources such as Measure I or Gas Tax. Project List & FY 2015-16 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2015-16 I. Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria Park $60,000 $60,000 Lane—Drainage Improvements Total $60,000 ■General Drainage B Project Number: 1L Key: 1874 Object: Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria Park Lane - Drainage Improvement Project Location: Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria Park Lane n J ��; �\�� VICTORIA ST C-I _ L [ 'U1 J+ Est.Construction Start/End: _� Iff �o�� 08/2015-10/2015 �� r°aaF+cELECT=+cIRA I� PACIFIC ELECTRICTRAIL Project Status: FIRE 5 TATION� Construction PROJECT L®CJA�TLON`, `l Z Department: I a I ' Engineering i I I f Project Manager: I {J n I nSE LINE RD I r` Walt Stickney ' Description: Drainage improvement along the Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria Park Lane. Justification: Currently when it rains erosion occurs along the trail and the slope at Victoria Park Lane. The drainage improvement will pick-up the flows and divert them to a storm drain and eliminating the erosion. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Design/Plan Review $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Construction $0. $52,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,700 Inspection&Administration s0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 Contingency $0 $5,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,300 Total Costs: $35,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 SO $95,000 Project Funding: IFunding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/1 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL General Drainage(112) $35,000 $60,000 $0 $0 50 $O $95,000 Total Costs: $35,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 Impact on Operations: Elimination of the drainage flows will eliminate the costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other areas. f B1 r----IF _-r�11_- . - r' r ( Facilities Projects that construct new buildings or that either improve, add on to, or renovate existing buildings and ancillary structures are typically classified as Facilities Projects. These projects ultimately result in new structures being added to the City's fixed facility inventory; however, some projects,placed in this category are considered capital rehabilitation as they focus on the remodeling or restoration of existing facilities. The majority of these projects are funded via City Reserve funds. Major projects may qualify for state, federal and/or grant funding. Typical operating expenses for facilities include increases in staffing, building and systems maintenance costs, overhead expenses and utilities. Project List& FY 2015-16 Expenditures Project List& FY 2015-I6 Expenditures I. Animal Care and Adoption Cntr— $850,000 Makeover Project 16.Sports Complex—Family Restroom $70,000 2. Archibald Library Office Re-design $5,000 17.Vittoria Gardens Cultural Ctr— $30,000 Courtyard Re-design 3. Central Park—Emergency Backup $50,000 18.Victoria Gardens Cultural Ctr— $25,000 Power Loading Bay 4. Civic Center—Council Chambers $200,000 Total $30,497,000 AV Replacement Phase II Sources of Funding for FY 2015-16 S. Civic Center-Elevator Control $77,000 $1,370,OOD $2 7�,,r,a 6. Civic Center—Landscape $250,000 $2,505.00 Renovation $5,000 7. Civic Center-Office Relocation $310,000 8. Civic Center—Roof Restoration/ Patio Replacement $730,000 9. Civic Center—Water Tower $300,000 $23 as0,WO 10. Fire District—Central Station 178 $1,400,000 (New) 11. Fire District—Jersey Station 174 $21,000,000 Training Facility 12. Fire District San Bernardino $800,000 Station 172 Relocation ■CFD 2003-01 ■Capital Reserves 13. Fire District Water Conservation, $600,000 ■Fire Capital Projects Landscaping 14. Paul A Biane Library—2nd Floor ■Library Capital ■ Park Development Rancho KIDS Project $2,500,000 I5. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports $1,300,000 Center—Relocation C IProject Number: JL Key: 1920 I Object: Animal Care and Adoption Center Makeover Project Location: -) _I � ,,K,�•I_„ J— -,�� Animal Care and Adoption Center 1� iSTAFFOR sr ��C_������ I I CHERVIL.5.I; J a 'FOOTHILL W VD J Q / Q Il ,tdll-t=EIJ NtUM.�%T H EPICENTER SPORTS COMPLEX Est.Construction Start/End: �� • '� RANCHO CUCAM'NGA ADVLTS ORTS COMPLEX // /j July 2015-June 2016 aclt_ueNN.r�e< RC ANIMAL CARECENTER w L Project Status: • —I Imo-. ARR'OW.:RTE I Design/Construction IUJ Y i, ,e%sr Department: ��;� `:•y PWSD/Animal Sheter =S•TATION�° PROJECT LOCATION 174 cc i nr Project Manager: ' T.Quaintance/V.Fincher Description: The makeover project will consist of:complete interior painting,removal of interior epoxy coating throughout the facility,interior energy efficient lighting,new kennel gates,installation of new interior sinks,new tile floors in the main lobby,enhancement of the interior plumbing in the kennel area and new sound acoustics to assist with interior noise level. ' Justification: The Animal Care and Adoption Center has been open to the community for over 9 years and is showing signs of wear due to the very busy day-to-day operations and the high volume of animals and visitors the center receives. The Center is in need of a makeover and this project will address many needs for the animals as well as the community and city staff. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Year, 2011111 1011117 2017111 2018 19 1111110 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 So Design/Plan Review $0 $75,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $697,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $697,500 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 IContingency $o $77,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $77,500 Total Costs: $0 $850,000 So $0 $0 $0 $850,000 ' Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Capital Reserve Fund(025) $0 $850,000 $0 5o $0 $0 $850,000 Total Costs: $0 5850,000 So $0 $0 50 $850,000 Impact on Operations: This project will update the Center's physical appearance as well as become more energy efficient with the new lighting and plumbing fixtures.The new floors will assist with the overall maintenance operations and will serve as a practical solutions for the daily operations of the center.Possible impacts:relocation of some of the animals during the kennel area makeover phase. C1 ' Project Number: JL Key: ' Object: 5602 Archibald library Office Re-design ' Project Location: I ��}Archibald Library staff areas: first y: EiEKEZi T floor (Circulation staff area) and CT second floor (staff area and BASL LINE Rr) L LL ' literacy office) —� LL ARCMIBALCCC���LIIBRARY ?�—r ;n r� tFCSNWl').C1D ST JI _4I J YACWAY y •--�-1 - -�¢t.UFFjrS '} �T ' Est.Construction Start/End: r�'S 1 v7:,-I,uT•cT c 4i.G.E TBD MA'.IW..LIA ST I —i 2 P- JECT LOCATI Project Status: RO I I + �s ' BALSAa"7 I 'Q, l4 IQ (t Design � � � � ( � .G I�--°-A_ Department: LL } I'(,-SII c > > Library q a a M LL �N r:ElriST IJ �iT�Y 4 YLV.V CT Prot Manager: Michelle Perera a ' Description: Redesign and new furniture for staff areas at the Archibald Library,including first floor staff office and area in Circulation;second floor administration area,staff room,and offices;and second floor literacy offices. Most of work will be cosmetic. Justification: Existing staff area is 20+years old with all original furniture(except chairs). Limited storage space and functional cubicles has fed to boxes, carts, and library materials crowding staff area. Creating a more efficient space will allow for better workflow, better working condition,more ergonomic,and more inviting for public into admin area. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $5,000 $0 so $0 $0 $5,000 I Right-of-Way 50 $0 $o $0 So $0 So Construction $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $175,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 50 $0 $0 5o $0 Contingency $0 $o $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 5180,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL I Library Reserve(329) $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Unknown $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $175,000 $175,000 Total Costs: $0 $5,000 $0 So I 50 $0 $5,000 Impact on Operations: No impact on operations. Overall space remains the same. I C2 Project Number: JL key 1914 Object: Central Park-Emergency Backup Power Project Location: I Central Park _PROJEV; �LOCA�104 = ELECTRIC TRAIL 1 j Est.Construction Start/End: i E (" I_ July 2015-June 2016 ���'' ! JAMES BRVLTE S IOR CENTS (�'Project Status: ; / RANCHO CVCAMONGA CENTRA ARK •. i i I Design GOL` LEWIS COMMuwTr rEh I ER Department. BASE LINE ' Eng/Fire/PW Project Manager: 1 B ' J.Dyer/M.Courtney/Ty Q. LJFn�-1 Description: To design an emergency backup power system which will provide 100% power for Central Park to be used as an evacuation center. Justification: The emergency back up power will be used during emergency situations where Central Park is used as an evacuation center. Project Cost Estimate($): ' Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018 19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 SO 50 $0 $0 $0 ' Design/Plan Review $0 $50,000 $0 $0 50 $o $50,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 50 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $o $o Contingency $0 $0 $0 S0 50 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0. $50,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $50,000 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Fire Fund(288) SO $50,000 $0 50 $o $0 $50,000 Total Costs: So $50,000 $0 $0 $0 ISD $50,000 Impact on Operations: None. I I C3 ' Project Number: JL Key Object: 5602 Civic Center Council Chambers AV Replacement- Phase II 1 Project Location: Civic Center-Council Chambers '—J Fo�TRIGs��rD N Z 1 `. —PROJECT LOCATION, 1 Est.Construction Start/End: June 2015-July 2016 GIYI.G_CFNTFR OR ,� �� `I Project Status: )IF 1 Construction Department: 0 Public Works Services c W s 1 Project Manager: I I ARROW RTE Ty Quaintance �— Description: Phase II of the Council Chamber AV Replacement. Justification: This phase will complete the AV Replacement project and includes new HD cameras,additional hardware and software updates, various lighting improvements and facility enhancements. Project Cost Estimate($): 1 Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $30,000 Right-of-Way $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Construction $530,520 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $730,520 Inspection&Administration $0 So $0 5o $o So $0 Contingency $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Total Costs: $560,520 $200,000 $0 $0 so $o $760,520 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) $300,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 PEG(882)" $250,000 $0 so $0 $0 $0 $250,000 I Fire Fund(288) $10,520 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,520 Total Costs: $560,520 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $760,520 I •••rmn nr,,,,.a.nc.wmn.,..,.nn,eq i>:ossnm .nu i.,n,-y,,,.,d nCPFG Iu�nP Impact on Operations: None. I I C4 1 Project Number: 1L Key: Object 5602 Civic Center- Elevator Control ' Project Location: Civic Center FOOTHILL BLVU W Q! 2! •y wi a v Z C L 1Est.Construction Start/End: July 2016 CIVIC-CFNSFR UI2 ' Project Status: ` ROJECT LOCATION Requested for FY 15-16 r Department: �0' Public Works Services I a w s 1 Project Manager: f�ARROW RTE Ty.Quaintance �— Description: To replace twenty year old elevator controls and hydraulic tank. ' Justification: Parts on the system have become obsolete,difficult to source and are in need of an upgrade.This should also improve reliability and operation. ' Project Cost Estimate(S): ExpenditureExpenditure/Categm Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 ' Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 Right-of-Way so 50 $o $0 50 $0 $0 - Construction $0 $77,000 $0 5o $0 $0 $77,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o ' Total Costs: $0 $77,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $77,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) $0 $77,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $77,000 Total Costs: $0 $77,000 $0 5o $0 $0 $77,000 Impact on Operations: There will be disruptions when it is being replaced. However, a new controller will guarantee the safety of all Ielevator users. I C5 Project Number: J L Key: Object: 5607 Civic Center- Landscape Renovation Project Location: JIIn Civic Center FOOTHILL-BLVD I \ is N a i N Est.Construction Start/End: 07/2014-06/2016 f CIVI.C_CF.NTF..RDR �� Project Status: Construction %%' PROJECT LOCATION / fDepartment: Q, Public Works Services t Project Manager: � AIiR04V RTE Dean Rodia ' Description: Continue the replacement of the high maintenance and water consuming turf and vegetation with low water use landscaping. This will provide landscaping alternatives to the surrounding community while conserving resources and reducing maintenance costs. Justification: The new landscaping will significantly reduce maintenance costs and water use requirements along with establishing a landscape conservation show piece for the community and future development. Work will start at perimeter and turf areas. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/1.6 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/2 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $599,730 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $599,730 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $180,000 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $405,000 Inspection&Administration $2,000. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 Contingency $18,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $43,000 Total Costs: $799,730 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,049,730 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019120 TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) $259,730 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $509,730 Total Costs: $259,730 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $509,730 Impact on Operations: There will be disruptions when the existing landscaping is removed and new landscaping installed. However,once completed,maintenance and irrigation costs will be much lower. I C6 Project Number: 1L Key: Object: 5602 Civic Center Office Relocations Project Location: w — ` City Hall FO�OTF1ILL BLVY 6' 2� �i d a vr�2 Est.Construction Start/End: 01/2016-04/2016 CIVIG.CFNTF..R UR ' Project Status: Design/Construction _,`• PROJECT LOCATION r v Department: Administrative Services/CMOLU L Project Manager: I� ARROW RIE Linda Daniels and Lori Sassoon �— Description: Work includes completing final reconfiguration of officed for DoIT and CMO. These spaces have not been updated since the early 1990's. Work includes architectural design,construction(walls,electrical,cabling,lighting,etc),carpet and furniture. Justification: DoIT needs a new space to accmmodate the entire team in its new Departmental format. CMO office furniture is in disrepair as most furniture is more than 20 years old. Both areas will re-use newer furniture and cubicle parts wherever possible. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $56,200 $30,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $86,200 ' Furnishings $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Construction $180,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $380,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $236,200 $310,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $546,200 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) $236,200 $310,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $546,200 Total Costs: $236,200 $310,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $546,200 Impact on Operations: No additional operational costs. Offices will provide more efficient work place for employees. C7 Project Number: 1L Key: 1892 Object: Civic Civic Center- Roof System Restoration/Patio Replacement 1 Project Location: I l y Civic center FOOTHILL BLVD N W .Q IZI 6 Z C 4 \\ 1 Est.Construction Start/End: 07/2015—06/2016 CIVIC_c FN.TF.R Ilk %l ! 1 Project Status: `., ,. , •� Phase 1 in FY14/15 `' =:; ROJECT LOCATION Phase 2 in FY15/16 I i 1v Department: Ian Public Works Services 1�I �9 s 1 Project Manager: I � I AR OW RTE Ty Quaintance 1 Description: Roof Restoration (Phase 1) - installed Title 24 Compliant & Energy Star Compliant high-build white reflective roof coating and flashing. Patio Replacement(Phase 2)-will remove&replace patio surface and waterproofing system. ' Justification: Patio Replacement(phase 2)-will seal all penetrations&joints to prevent water intrusion. 1 Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019120 TOTAL 1 Environmental/NPDES 5o $0 $0 50 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 Construction $258,790 $730,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $988,790 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Contingency 50 $0 50 $0 50 $o $0 Total Costs: 5308,790 $730,000 50 $0 50 $0 $1,038,790 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) $308,790 $730,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $1,038,790 Total Costs: $308,790 $730,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,038,790 Impact on Operations: Minimal-most work will occur when City Hall is closed. Patio demolition will occur during weekend. I C8 Project Number: 1L key ' Object: 5602 Civic Center-Water Tower ' Project Location: Civic Center ``-J L fOOTFiILL BLVtr Zi r L a < < Z 7 < f 2 / ' Est.Construction Start/End: 07/2015-06/2016 GIVI.�f.ENTFR UR Project Status: ,� ROJECT LOCATION t \ 1 Construction '.. `;•i t �i Department: u: Public Works Services a W ' Project Manager: I ARROW R-M Ty Qua intance Description: The cooling tower is twenty five years old and starting to show significant signs of failure.There is a lot of rust and corrosion. Justification: The existing cooling tower,which is a major component of the HVAC system at the Civic Center,has surpassed its life expectancy. Public Works recommends the existing tower be replaced with a new high efficiency cooling tower.If the tower fails we will have no way of providing heating or air conditioning to the facility. 1 Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $o $o $0 $0 $0 Right-of-way $0 So $o 5o $0 $0 $0 Construction so $300,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Inspection&Administration $o 5o $0 $o $o So $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Total Costs: $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 SO $300,000 I Impact on Operations: There will be disruptions when it is being replaced. However,a new water tower will help distribute better air flow within the building. I C9 ' Project Number: JL Key: 1645 ' Object: Fire District-Central Station (178) Project Location: i V I I � , ,; —.,- _� _ �r Within the boundary of south of �I 1' 4 7�/ ROJEC'6 WeATTOI�' r Base Line Road, north of Foothill BASE LINE RD /; I I'=_J�e='may'' U! Boulevard, east of Haven Avenue Z �- 1 and west of Milliken Avenue 'J�j �• J. �C'J + —1 /' G� ❑ 1r"s _—� Jr� Ul xp ONA MERG ED Y� 1 tt.a T RRA VIS�TA," ELEMENTAr r y /� i _.,� C� MEN ��]( Est.Construction Start/End: Unknown I RUTt US MIDDLE MIST �'—' LL __J✓ All � rM Project Status: _U�� `\ /��•—�' \�•—!��Choose New Location and �O = f 111 `\;moo WYON aquire property "\'EL MEN ARY Department: Fire Protection District I > orMrcL�tLv. � Project Manager: ,a W FOOTHI IFLVD - 2--�f' Chief Mike Costello/Pamela Pane ' Description: Acquisition of property for a future fire station. 1 Justification: This station will serve the center of the Rancho Cucamonga community. It will provide the area with emergency services for fire suppression and life safety. The project will be proposed to begin when the population and call volume trigger the need. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL ' Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Land Acquisition $0 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,400,000 ' Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000 $8,000,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 50 S0 S0 S0 ' Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,000,000 $10,400,000 ' Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital Projects(288) 50 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,000,000 $10,400,000 ' Total Costs: $0 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,000,000 $10,400,000 I Impact on Operations: Annual station operations and maintenance costs will depend on the station size and staffing costs at the time of construction. Designs with greater active/passive energy conservation and greater xeriscape will cost less to operate. Capital equipment purchase of an engine. I I C10 ' Project Number: JL Key: 1735 ' Object: Fire District-Jersey Station (174)Training Facility ' Project Location: Behind Jersey Fire Station (174) O and the Fire Maintenance Facility � 1 f on Jersey Boulevard. ARB:QWRZE Est.Construction Start/End: LLJ PROJECT LOCATIO 2015/16-2016/17 1 I I FIRE-S TATIO J RSEY EiCVU 174 1 Project Status: Phase II of Architectural Design �=W METROUINK-STATION Department: Z' .J Jy Fire Protection District D—,Q� Project Manager: Chief Cloughesy/Pamela Pane ' Description: Architect approved by the Fire Board on July 2,2014,for Phase II of the Architectural Design Services. ' Justification: A training facility has been part of the Jersey Station Master Plan since its inception. Several multi-story hotels have been constructed and additional mid-rise professional offices are proposed in the future necessitating this training tower. It will include expanded classrooms,a live burn building,multi-story training building and other props that will simulate construction features in present and future developments.Will include a Data Center that will provide for redundancy of services to strengthen our City's 15 infrastructure.Will also include the FIRE DOC and centralized storage for the District.Other driving forces for this All Risk Training Center are population growth,increased need to train with regional cooperating agencies and provison of a realistic facility our PD parners can utilize for local training and coordination. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016117 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL ' Environmental/NPDES $0 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 Design/Plan Review $1,902,920 $300,000 $0 $0 So $o $2,202,920 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 So $o ' Construction $0 $17,000,000 50 $0 50 So $17,000,000 Inspection&Administration $50,000 $1,700,000 $0 5o $0 $0 $1,750,000 ' Contingency $112,500 $1,860,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,972,500 Total Costs: $2,065,420 $21,000,000 $o $0 50 $0 523,065,420 ' Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Fire Capital Projects(288) $2,065,420 $21,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 523,065,420 Total Costs: $2,065,420 $21,000,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $23,065,420 Impact on Operations: Fire District operations and maintenance cost will increase. The cost will be better determined after the design Iphase is complete. Opportunities may exist for regional partnerships that could help effect operational costs. C11 Project Number: JL Key: 1733 Object: Fire District-San Bernardino Station (172) Relocation Project Location: \ ✓ °•/ ;! At the northwest corner of San \ J W Bernardino Road and Vineyard Ave 3 Y � \ � U:IdONNET"OR c? San j o Roa Est.Construction Start/End: PROJECT LOCATION Unknown C Project Status: J Property purchased for a 'a proposed location a CL J Department: FOgTMILL BLVD Fire Protection District Project Manager: Chief Mike Costello/Pamela Pane Description: New Fire Station construction at a new location. Property has been purchased for a proposed new location.Alternate locations are also being evaluated. Justification: Rebuilding and possibly relocating a 50+ year old fire station. This station serves the southwestern portion of the Rancho Cucamonga community. Project Cost Estimate($J: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 201617 201718 201819 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $o $o $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 Land Acquisition $0 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 50 So $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,500,000 $7,300,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 201516 201617 201718 201819 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital Projects(288) $0 $800,000 $0 $0 SO $6,500,000 $7,300,000 Total Costs: $0 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,500,000 $7,300,000 f Impact on Operations: No additional personnel costs - current San Bernardino Station personnel will move to the new station when complete. Larger station design could create an increase in maintenance costs, but greater efficiency in station equipment could make it a wash. C 12 ' Project Number: JL Key: ' Object: 5602 Fire District Water Conservation Landscaping Project Location: ' Amethyst Fire Station (171), Sans I ;;� t y .. Bernardino Fire Station (172), ......... ��'� •''�C::..... k II '1.{� -•:�9J�'�—...�ie.er .,V N:I,.ZN•445 iZ.^/s'I Banyan Fire Station(175),East Ave . I....:`;.�_.• .L.,.L�-� Fire Station(176)and the HellmanLLij -z '''i LANi r' __:.:. ! -u , d73 ' Fire Station 177 ;.;,'I r -- F—� ( ) ' ea 7 '^,4r Wr�.n.: ....I '.1T1• .�r,Yu.R�,:R.• - �l �I^.r,s •w�''"s'� �a�:l ��,'.� '{.�::�.�:.c.........,G'� I, i f:.�-�'n _ :_..::. i y VJ.. izt�•i�,rr:�� I. ..las( :. � •., �, ` -,_, FJ:-'•��..��:�"��R 4�,. _'a i'...•r:.•.w' SII ra•vr _ y.' - •.: -.:n:e.cve.......� _ ........_ Yu 1 e. ...,... '� en Est.Construction Start/End: .:,t sk„•" r_1 ,, lr•.b js. $ `-4tc'. -,=.:.:�4 ,9raea+-tiaE..i<n uyr.--.. ,:::�_*......_--? •_.S-.A �'v };,�° •tet ::L : .`.•'I i a 07/2015-06/2016 i7! ,7-1' " Th�-+ryy :•_ .° CEJ l.. ~ '[L, :Yti:,__.T:.a� ..:I . i'iuox•erv_'i:'S�s..�r„ •T =- •:',wM; "vle ~•-�r aL a'.:M--• .•v. r:i'""R A. p� �i z?•�f;;.,��.�� rr�-1� E ��'�;'?', Project Status: •* 'r. C -. �� — •� - i:� I` '3�w�r•'S�I�'�;F,�r.:c.im:Ti.p L. Not started i �`_�__:.. _:� rac•�'9�: _'.Li i.svr--- - --� '� �''�.�':i,!—rs_'.?,?sa`J �:a,, '��5;2 — ti. •! yl)c ...,,, _��•;T � ...I��• .. KR_ JAI.J� +.f.., 5 ,a4��._,.,ua•::-c n,_;;.:...�:...t..c ~' _ =ra'K '5�;�,pi{:� " P' -s�•:� L �c.e""g :"3:.,`•C :.I I.; r�°! I,I ^,•�. is�, �T,!r':. :r•!'y,i.jr., :[�,:�v=.:'�d •:';.:tj•�•,.. ,.pis Department: ? s r:,ii ?FI.. -, i;q s a;I jl i h- �e w l Mv � • i•xri ��„�.7TFY MEI tI.Yr�L. - :A�•.!.::' �iI� -"I__—..�,x,.'�':� tiY I:SCk�nvu Fire Protection DistrictiLU- I i' i,'t{' � •";i"' �r'.'=�Yj�},,�=1 ;�.: ,'�'• - .._ _ _ ''-V�-' is i �:dr'`FS"��� J _ s ._.........__ Project Manager: �t b =�.�_::,,-::� �., —....,...._:::a=.- _, _ ,:�.r':•. _��, Chief Cloughesy/Pam Pane PROJECT LOCATION ' Description: Retro-fitting of the fire stations from grass to a combo of artificial turf and xeriscaping. ' Justification: Executive order from the State of California to take measures to reduce water consumption. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL ' Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Construction $0 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Total Costs: $0 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Fire Capital Fund(288) $0 $600,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $600,000 Total Costs: $0 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 Impact on Operations: Decrease in maintenance and operations. Will not know the full impact until we have a design. C13 Project Number: JL Key: 1867 Object: Paul A. Biane Library-Second Floor Rancho KIDS Project Project Location: FX ` = %•�` I \\ cvrrr<, t 12505 Cultural Center Drive l(�' ( CHURCH ST c S ED Ha IUIFL FZ NTER DR Z's til VICTbkIA ARDEN5 CULTI�RAL NTE` PAUL�NE LIBRARY i I y _ J= 1 fA t�ltl'li N.si EE.T' - '� :l r j'%• ROJECT LOCATION •RAF Est.Construction Start/End: FY 2014/15 to complete design drawings and establish _ — 4 W construction cost estimates. I _ �VLRSI. s='O : Q=VE SAICL-E S-SProject Status: AHE Es. .— ) VICTOR 5 LN Design/Construction ^�._.—� Department: W '� Library s �.`--� , FOOTHILL BLVD u y Project Manager: Michelle Perera Description: Rancho KIDS is a project that will build out the second floor of the Paul A. Biane Library at Victoria Gardens. Rancho KIDS is envisioned as an interactive children's museum combined with traditional library services to create a new type of learning experience. Design and cost estimates of the second floor has been established as a City Council goal for FY 2014-15. Justification: Demand for library services in the community continues to increase,particularly for the ages 0-7. Rancho KIDS is being designed to provide a new, unique service model that will combine the features of interactive children's museum exhibits with traditional library services. Rancho KIDS should also be a regional draw that will provide additional visitors to both the Victoria Gardens ' Shopping District and the Lewis Family Playhouse. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017118 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 So $o $0 $o Design/Plan Review $290,000 $0 $0 $750,000 $0 So $1,040,000 ' Right-of-Way $o $0 SO So $0 $o $0 Construction $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $3,500,000 SO $6,000,000 Inspection&Administration $0 So $o $0 $0 $0 SO Contingency $20,000 $0 $0 $0 5300,000 $0 $320,000 Total Costs: $310,000 $2,500,000 $0 $750,000 $3,800,000 $0 $7,360,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Library Services Fund(329) $310,000 $2,500,000 $0 $750,000 $3,800,000 $o $7,360,000 Total Costs: $310,000 $2,500,000 $0 $750,000 $3,800,000 $0 $7,360,000 Impact on Operations: Feasibility study projects an approximate$300,000 per year cost for operations and maintenance. (The project is designed to be revenue-generating.) I C14 Project Number: 1L Key: 1896 Object: Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center-Relocation Project Location: i + u Parking Lot G at the Epicenter F00'I111LL BLVD ��ILLENNIV 4iC.T� CLHl11ftY C�, . Est.Design Start/End: 07/2015-06/2016 R NCHOQUCAM1IONG4'40U 'PORTS c0©EX Project Status: r--. �/ L:in�k:TteNN�DIe Design/Construction PROJECT LOCATION .... RC ANIMAL .4RE RADOP TION II / / Department: Community Services/Parks ARROW ROUTE a' 6 W /Project Manager: � �a ' Nettie Nielsen Description: This project will provide the schematic design, construction documents and administrators for the relocation of the existing Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center. Justification: Need to relocate existing facility and programs due to loss of existing building use. Project Cost Estimate($): ' Expenditure/Cateeory Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 2018/19 2019/2 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $50,000 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,350,000 Right-of-Way $D $0 $o $0 $0 $o. $0 Construction $0 $0 $11,635,070 $0 $0 $0 $11,635,070 1 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $494,330 $0 $0 $0 $494,330 Contingency 50 SO $1,129,290 $0 $0 $0 $1,129,290 Total Costs: $50,000 $1,300,000 $13,258,690 $0 $0 $0 $14,608,690 ' Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/1 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL ' Capital Reserve Fund(025) $0 $0 $2,858,690 $0 $0 $0 $2,858,690 Park Development(120) $50,000 $1,300,000 $2,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,050,000 Citywide Infrastructure(198) $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 Recreation(250) $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Equip/Vehicle Replacement(712) $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 I Fundraising $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Total Costs: $50,000 $1,300,000 $13,258,690 $0 $0 $0 $14,608,690 Impact on Operations: This project will ultimately require maintenance of a new facility,as well as new landscape and irrigation. I I C15 Project Number: 1L key 1911 Object: Sports Complex-Family Restroom ' Project Location: _ Sports Complex J 4�� FOOTHILL BLVD J a a � yl „v+BAk 9n wnr� Ct16LENNoUg r-/ Est.Construction Start/End: `CIS i 07/2015-06/2016 th 4''. EP cENTE0.'SPpRTS GOR7P�E �p Project Status: , h, / `, JACK BENNY DR / Design/Construction . PROJECT LOCATION. RC A NIM AL'I I4 R E E A D4PTION C-NTER Department: I ARRGW RGUTE , Community Services Department Iz ' Project Manager: Nettie Nielsen ' Description: To construct family restroom at Sports Complex. Justification: Based on Federal law mandate and customer requests for such an area. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES So 50 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $3,000 $o 50 5o $0 $3,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction S0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 Contingency 50 $6,000 $o $0 $0 50 $6,000 Total Costs: $0 $70,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $70,000 ' Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Park Development Fund(120) $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 Total Costs: $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 Impact on Operations: None. C 16 Project Number: JL Key: 1894 Object: Victoria Gardens Cultural Center-Courtyard Redesign Project Location: U _ l 12505 Cultural Center Drive o .� U fI `\NICD!��jp Sr_y_Y4�YIjj U a 00 \\\ O !6. J 'IILTiJP.:41 c.IN IF. DR 2' ,l j os VICTOP.IA,G�F6'. i:N3 C RAL GEN TER = PAU B14NE LIB Est.Design Start/End: I 1, ........ 07/2015-12/2015 TN'MAINS.t73E!(i--~' 4—�• w //,:•/,/ Project Status: VERSAILLLS}1=G—i a_ I`.��,/��ij;�jj// ----::.+eKv:r'•,; Design VIC:I Department: PROJECT t�OCATtON. Community Services/Parks u a 1 Project Manager: --,•j a ^„ Nettie Nielsen 17 ;y�I 21 tDescription: This project will be done in conjunction with Victoria Gardens to develop a design for the Cultural Center Courtyard. Justification: Provide enhancements to the existing courtyard to make the space more inviting for the public and rental opportunities. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 Construction SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 Inspection&Administration So $0 $D $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $30,000 $0 $0 So $400,000 $430,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) SO $25,000 SO $0 50 $0 $25,000 ICFD 2003-01 Cultural Center(615) $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Unknown $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 Total Costs: $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $430,000 Impact on Operations: This project will ultimately require additional maintenance as well as new landscape and irrigation. I C17 1 Project Number: JL Key: 1895 1 Object: Victoria Gardens Cultural Center-Loading Bay ' Project Location: 12505 Cultural Center Drive CHURCH 5 1 m^_ �'�F�,• J �u`�Sy � V 1 i VIC TOP.IA S CULTU RAL GEM TER n _ PAU LBIARDENANQ LIBRA T I x. / r_I�OR711_I„•nJM:. FE'T Est.Construction Start/End: a •� %.,�'% 08/2015-12/2015 '+fJ,L Wl,,41N5:TRLL 1—�C—�+�� QQ W a i Project Status: �n Desig I �:” ". . i-:•. PROJECT LOCATION VIG7 LivGAkDt S LN 1 -mss � = Department: Community Services/Parks W 4' Project Manager: Nettie Nielsen 1 Description: This project involves the design to cover the Service/Loading Bay at Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. Justification: Project will provide covered area for theater construction projects. Project Cost Estimate($): ' Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 s0 Design/Plan Review So $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 ' Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 50 Total Costs: 50 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 5300,000 $325,000 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) $o $25,000 50 $0 $0 $0 525,000 Unknown $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 ITotal Costs: 5o $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Impact on Operations: Improvements will require maintenance of the structure and added light fixtures,as well as minimal electric cost for Ilight useage. C18 Miscellaneous Miscellaneous projects are the capital undertakings that do not qualify for classification into the other project categories. These are often one-time projects that are prompted �by ��� factors such as: - State or Federal Mandates - Community Health and Safety Issues - Council Goals and Priorities - Regional Needs Assessments - Interagency Agreements - External Funding Arrangements These projects may or may not have maintenance obligations and they are typically funded from a variety of special funding sources; they are rarely funded via the General Fund. Project List & FY 2015-I6 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2015-16 I. ADA Ramps at Various Locations $100,000 2. Base Line Rd Utility Underground $554,570 —Carnelian St to Vineyard Ave $ 65,000 ,ti='?s.;• 3. Cucamonga Creek Channel $28,000 Fencing Construction >., a; 554,570 4. Deer Creek Channel $12,000 Fencing Construction 5. Metrolink Station Parkin Lot— Parking $265,000 840,000 Resurfacing ,; Total $959,S70 $ioo,o Underground Utilities ■ Measure "I" ■Capital Reserve ■LMD 3B D tProject Number: 800-2015-13 1L Key: 1150 Object: ADA Ramps at Various Locations Project Location: Various locations City Wide �.ri ri�rLlIV Rn' -wnn}i .nve—� ` vneav°+."a'v! IL.It'l:ave-eeccN^.v�e n VM W RAR 'ANS'-'�'� C: A.5 Est.Construction Start/End: =Tn4*T ,. ''• I.1_',�`� ��� ��=fir, J 04/2016-05/2016 AIL SRWN!-Rp 1�� 'r i k' ' -'� ��� • Project Status: F hNkl '.�' ^{ %.. 614. A! Design/Construction ' ty's rl ,s Onln,l-I T Department: y,�—�-��1`tl =. --1 `wTnx �reRsly-ems r _ Engineering 1' ' ^YIImne Project Manager: Curt Billings Description: Construct ADA compliant ramps at various locations citywide.Locations for ramp installations come from the ADA Transition Plan, which is updated annually. This capital project encompasses all ADA compliance issues that cannot be incorporated into other improvement projects,but which must still be addressed in a timely fashion. Justification: Meets the City's ongoing commitment to install ADA ramps where they are missing and required by law. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o ' Construction $287,790 $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $377,790 Inspection&Administration $o $0 $0 $0 $o $o $0 ' Contingency $0 $10,000 50 $0 50 $0 $10,000 Total Costs: $287,790 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $387,790 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Measure I Fund(177) $287,790 $100,000 $0 $0 SO $0 $387,790 Total Costs: $287,790 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $387,790 Impact on Operations: None I D1 Project Number: 800-2010-13 JL Key: 1776 Object: Base Line Road Utility Underground Project Location: ' Base Line Road from Carneliany�'" /7 � r L_�Z_ a. �a viAe sT Street to Vineyard Avenue I CARNELIAN ROJECT �OCATION: ELErdENTARY I Y? 1 J11i'XiTA 0t w � Al TALONIA c �F �CSan J a :N e v a a -bduTa tiR" HIGH Q 5 Est.Construction Start/End: _ \ $ J'<Jz i 06/2016-01/2017 �� v ievlil (I� 11 � ; ROBERpS:ST Project Status: —� '- --� Construction —LIC i J i i ea+r�DE�A� �Department: I- I n l � � K p WyJ9.lUknS� I > a (' DeP t� ?�\. Engineering u a n -Aie:_.zs-1 Jf( N � �1' P � � ! I �j yty 19 encurnA_T z rf f :C).ELPh9DS� JJ� + �•. y. G rAJp CT - LSE-D L.P_fiQPy tlo Project Manager: �— 1 _ :Z Y �� F1i �� �I Walt Stickne ; Description: This project will underground a stretch of existing overhead utilities along Base Line Road from Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue. Justification: The removal of the overhead utilities,by placing them underground,improves the aesthetic appearance of the area. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 Construction $0 $481,420 $0 $0 $0 $0 $481,420 Inspection&Administration s0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Contingency $0 $48,150 $0 $0 $o $0 $48,150 ' Total Costs: $0 $554,570 $o $0 $D $0 5554,570 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Underground Utilities(129) $0 $554,570 $0 $o So $o $554,570 ITotal Costs: 50 $554,570 $0 $0 $0 $0 $554,570 Impact on Operations: None I D2 Project Number: 1L key Object: 5607 Cucamonga Creek Channel Fencing Construction ' Project location: v '-."A . A ux a ur Base Line Rd @ Cucamonga Creek ,x ; R J Channel i i c, Z L •! �O -t RORERDS ST L Est.Construction Start/End: TBD z Project status: BASE LINE ROAD ' Construction VIA LADEFA • t Department: !I Public Works Services VIAAIROSA PROJECT LOCATION w 7} K Project Manager: y xl — < Ernest Ruiz Description: Install fencing to restrict access to areas under the Base Line Rd.bridge structure at the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Justification: The Police Department, Code Enforcement, and Public Works Services have an ongoing issue with homeless people and ' encampments under the Base Line Rd.bridge structure.Public Works Services has to respond to this location on a regular basis to remove graffiti and miscellaneous debris generated from the encampments. The intent of this project is to restrict assess to areas under the Base Line Rd.bridge structure. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL ' Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $28,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $28,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $28,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) So $28,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,000 Total Costs: $0 $28,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,000 Impact on Operations: None. D3 Project Number: JL key Object: 5607 Deer Creek Channel Fencing Construction Project Location: I& J F— I— Foothill Blvd @Deer Creek Channel > 2 REGIS�7 L� L Est.Construction Start/End: TBD PROJE T LOCATION. i ' Project Status: Construction 1NILL BOULEVARD Department: j _h/ � Public Works Services Project Manager: E s7 Ernest Ruiz Description: Install fencing to restrict access to areas under the Foothill Blvd.bridge structure at the Deer Creek Channel. Justification: The Police Department, Code Enforcement, and Public Works Services have an ongoing issue with homeless people and encampments under the Foothill Blvd bridge structure.Public Works Services has to respond to this location on a regular basis to remove graffiti, miscellaneous debris, and campfire rings generated from the encampments. The intent of this project is to restrict access to areas under the Foothill Blvd.bridge structure. Project Cost Estimate)$): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 50 $o $0 SO $0 $0 ' Right-of-Way $0 So $0 $0 $o $o $o Construction $0 $12,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $12,000 Inspection&Administration So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: So $12,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $12,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) $0 S12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 Total Costs: $0 $12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 Impact on Operations: None. D4 Project Number: 800-2015-21 JL Key: 1919 Object: Metrolink Station Parking Lot Resurfacing Project Location: Metrolink Station 3: ROJECT LOCATION-i IT4 IT L RAILROAD P.IETR( Est.Construction Start/End: 06/2016—07/2016 NEWEORT Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: 6TH ST LL Romeo David 151 1 Description: This project involves the resurfacing of the existing parking lots at the metrolink Station Justification: This project will restore the parking lot surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use and rideability. Project Cost Estimate Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES so $0 $o $o $0 $o $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $25,000 Right-cif-Way $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $o $200,000 $0 so $0 $0 $200,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $20,000 $0 so $o $o $20,000 Contingency $0 $20,000 so $0 $o $o $20,000 Total Costs: $0 $265,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $265,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL LMD 3B(133) $0 $265,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $265,000 Total Costs: $0 $265,000 $o $o $0 $o $265,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. D5 Municipal Utility The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) was formed by the City Council in 2001. RCMU served its first customers in 2003 and finished construction of the Victoria Arbors substa- tion in 2004. Currently, RCMU services over 900 customers in its service area. Annually, more than 78,000 megawatt-hours of electricity are distributed to our customers via 20 circuit miles of wire spread across the roughly 4-square miles of service territory. RCMU's historical peak demand is 17.5 megawatts, set in August 2011. RCMU capital projects are related to the maintenance, expansion and improvement of the RCMU distribution system. RCMU's distribution system was designed to minimize maintenance and operating costs and ensure maximum reliability of service. Project List & FY 2015-16 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2015-16 5165 Doo I. 6th St at Utica Ave-Line Extension $236,000 2. Day Creek Blvd & Base Line Rd— $200,000 Line Extension 3. Distribution System Automation $250,000 4. Fiber Optics Assessment $150,000 5. Solar Carport Expansion—Civic Ctr $165,000 5636.000 Total $1,001,000 ■ Capital Reserve (025) 7 Municipal Utility(705) r Project Number: JL Key: 1918 ' Object: Sixth Street at Utica Avenue-Line Extension Project Location: u Sixth Street and Utica Avenue UJn CA-i:tA=51:.-1 3 LU 9r: Z. a J ;¢; ��•i�� zs�rsi_3 PROJECT L®CATI� (N _ Est.Construction Start/End: 03/2016-05/2016 L w Project Status: i e Design/Construction S.rJ Department: r-s.r 5TW Engineering / � r�SS10 Project Manager: 4T.14 —.— r�--]^ Fred Lyn U Description: Distribution Line Extension to service two new planned industrial developments on Utica Avejust north of Sixth Street Justification: Line extension is needed to extend power service to this new industrial development.The City piad SCE exit fees for the right to service any load associated with a newly constructed facility that has never been interconnected with Edison;this falls under that category. ' Project Cost Estimate Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL ' Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 So 5o So $0 Design/Plan Review 50 56,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 Right-of-way $0 $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 Construction 50 $230,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $230,000 Inspection&Administration $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: SD $236,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $236,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL ' Municipal Utility(Fund 105) $o $236,000 50 $0 $o $0 $236,000 Total Costs: $o $236,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $236,000 Impact on Operations: The increased'electricity toad will provide additional revenue to RCMU. I E1 Project Number: A Key: 1917 Object: Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road -Line Extension Project Location: i ( I f I c I 11 , RCMU Electric Line Extension-Day �J IlJI ��J( Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road �� w W J PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL � a Est.Construction Start/End: PROJECT LOCATION. 01/2016-03/2016 f �f Project Status: Construction �� [V BASE LINE RD ' Department: Engineering Project Manager: ' Fred Lyn Description: Distribution Line Extension to service a new planned commercial development on the NWC of Day Creek and Baseline Road with RCMU electricity. Justification: Line extension is needed to extend power service to a new commercial development shopping center.The City paid SCE exit fees for the right to service any load associated with a newly constructed facility that has never been interconnected with Edison;this falls under that category. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016117 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Right-of-Way $0 $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 1 Construction $0 $200,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $200,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $10,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $210,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Municipal Utility(Fund 705) $10,000 $200,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $210,000 Total Costs: $10,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $210,000 Impact on Operations: The increased electricity load will provide additional revenue to RCMU. I E2 Project Number: 1L Key: 1916 Object: Distribution System Automation Project Location: V1 ra'.n N-c—.—Y.. Various key RCMU Switch > cv s .lf•IFIf.[L!C• locations in RCMU Service Area yyLT�I4�I VyyL:L-INL:ND= \\\`` \`:``�\ \\\,\ ;, \\. •,y'' Est.ConstructionStart/End: 07/2015 /2016 06 RROJEG Project Status: l� T t; •.fir-.c�� .�� _;' Design Construction . ,,. � \� � `�'� ���' �y Department: _ Engineering Project Manager: I I Fred Lyn Description: Deployment of remotely and/or automatically controlled devices within RCM U's Distribution System. Justification: Placement of automated equipment in key asset infrastructure within RCMU's distribution system would allow for improvement in system reliability and efficiency in quickly identifying outages.The ability to remotely monitor distribution system conditions and and possibly control switches would reduce customer outage duration and improve restoration time. A SCADA system with a communication network such as wireless or existing fiber optic will be required. Project Cost Estimate($): ' Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $o $0 ' Design/Plan Review $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5o Construction $o $100,000 $0 So $0 $0 $100,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 Contingency $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Total Costs: $o $250,000 $0 so $0 $0 $250,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/2 TOTAL Municipal Utility(Fund 705) $0 $250,000 s0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Total Costs: $0 $250,000 So $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Impact on Operations: The increased reliability will provide better customer service in identifyingpotential outages and restoring P g r ng power as quickly as possibly in RCMU's service area. E3 Project Number: 1L Key: 1910 ' Object: Fiber Optics Assessment Project Location: Various locations throughout the _ �� aiI; a City where existing fiber optics e Q PA If7 ECiR1e'T;,.gli. AGIFI.FLEGTRI•TRAIL conduits are located �" W FI E )i`71 N �h 'f Est.Construction Start/End: j TBD Lu LLI 'D %/ \ \ \\ \ \ �\ \ •.\yy \ \ t Project Status: w \ ` Designcc c 5•r• \, �\ t. \ .\� \. Department: 1` \ �\ \ \ \ \�; ••J 1 Engineering * \ a Z � a Project Manager: TMtST r z Fred Lyn Gr Description: Select consultant to evaluate the City's existing fiber optics system that currently connects to most of the city facilities. The consultant will prepare a report that will provide a detailed termination and tagging assessment of existing fiber and recommend any solutions.The report will also provide a feasibility study on"next steps"towards utilizing our fiber optics conduit to provide municipal broadband to commercial and industrial areas Justification: Now is the time to consider laying the groundwork regarding Broadband opportunities and RCMU. Providing fiber optics broadband to commercial customers is a business opportunity that we are missing because we have not been systemic enough in ' our approach over the past few years. Completing a report on all our dark fiber so we can start looking at how we could monetize that asset and selling broadband as a commodity would fit well with the Smart City initiative,as well as promote a high tech economy and economic development within the City. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 So $0 SO 50 Design/Plan Review so $150,000 So 50 $0 50 $150,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 So $0 ' Construction $0 $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 So ' Contingency So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5o Total Costs: So $150,000 $0 '$0 5o $0 $150,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Municipal Utility(Fund 705) $0 $150,000 $0 $0 SO $0 $150,000 MTotal Costs: $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 SO S150,000 Impact on Operations: The potential to bring in high speed broadband as a commodity will provide additional revenue to RCMU. E4 Project Number: JL Key: ' Object: 5602 Solar Carport Expansion Project Location: ; Solar Carport - City Hall (North Foo rwn vo I ROJECT LOCATION Parking lot) ir. i ( (y Q % Z j Est.Construction Start/End: CITY HALL '� W �TBD RIAOLICESTATION /\J, wCIVIC-CENTER DR • 1, Project Status: a �•,�. •// Construction Department: INi Engineering al 0 a LL: Project Manager: ARROW ROUTE I Fred Lyn �— ' Description: Complete installation of the remaining 66 kW of solar panels on the existing carport in the City Hall north(employee)parking lot. ' Justification: A 30 kW solar system, along with a carport structure was constructed in 2015 in the City Hall north employee parking lot.The remaining structure still has room to accommodate another 66 kW of solar panels to"complete"the project. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 ' Construction $315,000 $165,000 $165,000 $0 $0 $0 $645,000 Inspection&Administration $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Contingency $31,373 $0 $0 $0 $0 $31,373 Total Costs: $346,373 $165,000 $165,000 $0 $0 $0 $676,373 ' Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Municipal Utility Fund(705) $134,447 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $134,447 t Utility Public Benefit Fund(706) $62,700 $0 $0 $0 $00 $ $62,700 Capital Reserve(025) $149,226 $165,000 $165,000 $0 $0 $0 $479,226 Total Costs: $346,373 $165,000 $165,000 $0 $0 $0 $676,373 Impact on Operations: The expansion of more solar panels will provide more local generation for City Hall,which will account for reduced energy usage from the utility,allow for solar generation to count towards RCMU's renewable requirements. E5 Parks Any capital project that is located in, on, or adjacent to a park or community center facility is classified as a Park Project. These include the construction of new park facilities, as well as the expansion or rehabilitation of existing park facilities. Improvements include playing fields, play ground equipment, park landscaping, other miscellaneous recreational amenities, restroom facilities and parking lot improvements. Many of these projects require ongoing maintenance, and all field rehabilitation projects and renovations are performed on an annual or bi-annual basis due to extensive wear from local league play. The majority of Park Projects are funded via the Park Development Fund (120), which is collected via residential development fees (i.e. new single family, town home, condo and senior housing). Some projects qualify for grants and Special District funds. Project List& FY 2015-16 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2015-16 I. Central Park-Outdoor Improvements $40,000 2. Garcia Park—ADA Swing and Rubber- $40,000 $40,000$40.000 9s,000 ized Playground $50,000 3. Los Amigos Park—New Park $3,539,360 4. Red Hill Park Lake Modification $295,000 S. Sports Complex—Artificial Turf at 2 $50,000 soccer Fields Total $3,964,360 $3,539,36 E]Park Development ■LMD 9 Lower Etiwanda ®Prop 84 State Grant Capital Reserve ■Citywide Infrastructure F Project Number: 1L Key: 1871 ' Object: Central Park-Trail Head Improvements Project Location: 11200 Base Line Road SO P C1 IC EI..F.CIRIC TRAIL PROJECT LOCATION _ } Est.Design Start/End: - // r •; 07/2015-10/2015 Project Status: BASE LINE RD RASE LINt RD Design JsI)I (({ j Department: _7Z) __J7ruJ� za1 I Y Community Services/Parks J Project Manager: __J tcKK�v�szppPg Nettie Nielsen /�. ! ' Description: This project will provide the next phase of development for Central Park,which will include the design for a less than five acre area north of the interior road,between the PE Trail and the Community Center. Included will be an area for outdoor fitness equipment for trail and resident's use at the park site,as well as potential parking and restroom facilities for both park and trail users. Justification: Responds to resident's requests for further improvements to Central Park and provides ADA accessibility between the Community Center and the PE Trail. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 Design/Plan Review $20,000 $40,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $60,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 $950,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $47,500 $47,500 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 5o $0 $0 Total Costs: $20,000 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 5997,500 $1,057,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Park Development(120) $20,000 $40,000 5o $0 $0 $0 $60,000 Unknown $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $997,500 $997,500 Total Costs: $20,000 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $997,500 $1,057,500 Impact on Operations: This project,will require maintenance such as cleaning and replacing any damaged portions of the equipment,as well as landscape irrigation and maintenance as needed. F1 Project Number: 1L Key: 1913 Object: Garcia Park ADA Swing Bay and Rubberized Surface Project Location: Garcia Park j Q� i ZMtLLEF3 SVP 1, LU �J r Q �i X11 Est.Construction Start/End: July 2015-June 2016 / a > ! Project Status: / Vf Construction i GAR PAR PAR ll � IJ , Department: Public Works Department i PROJECT LOCATION (� �e Project Manager: FOOTHILL B v -•, Dean Rodia Description: Install a neaw ADA compliant swing bay that will allow for the installation of ADA compliant swings that will be used by special i needs children. The project will be located in the existing rubberized playground area requiring the installation of the new support footings and the repair of the current rubberized surface to match color and design. Justification: To be compliant with ADA regulations and to meet the evergrowing need for playground equipment that can be used by special needs children. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 MConstruction $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,000 Inspection&Administration so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 Total Costs: 50 $40,000 $0 $0 SO $0 $40,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Lower Etiwanda(139) $0 $40,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $40,000 Total Costs: $0 $40,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $40,000 Impact on Operations: Swing will not be able to be used while it is under renovation. However,once completed,it will be up to code and operational. F2 1 Project Number: 1L Key: 1754 1 Object: Los Amigos Park 1 Project Location: East side of Madrone Avenue 1 / 'Z FOOTHILL BLVD between Arrow Route and 9th Street ;N. \`�¢�`` / f` ROJEC�r LOCATION: 1w `FSG < Est.Construction Start/End: Q'ti a / s 0 01/2015-01/2017 x I� y LLI 1 Project Status: ] > I I I I�� �I BEAR GU, LCti PA, RI(— Construction A RR O.W-R:t UJ~� 9 I Department: IMS Community Services IT. Project Manager: Li Nettie Nielsen ; ' Description: In previous years this projet has been referred to as Southwest Cucamonga Park. The City was awarded$3,941,136,as a Prop 84 State Grant,to design and construct a 3.4 acre neighborhood park for the locatl residents in Southwest Cucamonga. Project must be completed byJune 2017. ' Justification: No other neighborhood park within a 1/2 mile radius. Park will serve low income neighborhood. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $4,380 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,380 Design/Grant Prep $399,060 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $399,060 Site Remediation $40,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $40,000 Construction $0 $3,418,050 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,418,050 Inspection&Administration $33,710 $121,310 $0 50 $0 $0 5155,020 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $477,150 $3,539,360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,016,510 IProject Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Park Development(120) $87,500 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $87,500 Prop 84 State Grant(235) $389,650 $3,539,360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,929,010 Total Costs: $477,150 $3,539,360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,016,510 I Impact on Operations: This project will provide a new neighborhood park and will require park maintenance such as mowing and cleaning of bathrooms,as well as maintenance of all other amenities and landscape irrigation. It will increase operational and maintenance costs by approximately$60,000 per year in General Fund. I F3 Project Number: 800-2015-01 A Key: 1897 ' Object: Red Hill Park lake Modernization Project Location: BASE LINE RD Red Hill Community Park Lake, �LIONS-CENTER-WEST. 49 located at the southwest corner of LIONS CENTER EAST Base Line Road and Vineyard I J I LIONS PARK w j ::U Avenue > -,9PEPP[R ST a SPL _ a a� v D Q �L4kR.ST ;; A rz Z' r. gLD.E..ST Est.Construction Start/End: s= CALLEnF.I_GRAIi(i�� 11/2015-01/2016 ,=I a PROJECT LOC ATION I � E Rb MILL COMMUNITY PARK _ Project Status: 7 I G Yom. Construction 1� _ Ci J � ,:G;NGCEy.'ti.G.b_ !"1u V.l}l.LK2i ST Q' r 1 Department: S„ YFVV ST Engineering Z LL , LL: 2 Project Manager: LE VIS7A — , 9P L `� GFiIlRCIi:S7 Romeo David MENTARY \ A�cHurit.y srT� `;�' I`^I3 (7 I I (? ' Description: This project involves modification of irrigation,installation of new 4"mainline,new isolation valves,re-routing irrigation wires,eye ball inlet basket,aeration,irrigation skid,new reducer and pipe spool,new controller and cabinet,new-pumps and solar panels. ' Justification: This project will complete renovation of Lake's recirculation and aeration system. Lake will be convert into a recycled water irrigation reservoir to increase turnover.Recycled water stored in the lake will be used to irrigate a section of Red Hill Park which is prudent use of this resource. Project Cost Estimate(S): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO $o 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $67,490 $0. $0 $0 $0 $0 $67,490 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $o SO $0 50 $0 Construction $0 $250,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $20,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Contingency $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 ' Total Costs: $67,490 $295,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $362,490 Project Funding: IFunding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL General Fund(001) $22,240 So $0 5o $0 $0 $22,240 Infrastructure Fund (198) $45,250 $295,000 $0 So $0 $0 5340,250 Total Costs: $67,490 $295,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $362,490 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance due to daily recirculation of recycled water, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. New solar panels will generate power to power up the pumps, which will save in annual costs,with those savings going towards the repayment of the loan from the General Fund. I I F4 Project Number: JL Key 1915 Object: Sports Complex-Artificial Turf at 2 Soccer Fields Project Location: Sports Complex L__Ij FOOTHILL BLVD z R!JECT LOCATION ATION Est.Construction Start/End: -7111 D SPORTS COMPLEX RANCHoru C AM ON rA- 7TJU TSB Project Status: r-- Design RC ANIMALT[ON CENTER Z • Department: tl ARROW ROUTE Public Works Services Z Project Manager: 64 n Dean Rodia Description: Replace two existing grass soccer fields with artificial turf, fencing and drainage. Cost includes maintenance equipment and materials. Justification: Less water will be needed for artificial turf.New fields will add additional playing time to the fields. Project Cost Estimate Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TED TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $o so $0 $o $0 so Design/Plan Review SO $50,000 $o $0 $o $o $50,000 Right-of-Way $0 $o $o so $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $2,600,000 $2,600,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 so $o $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $o $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,600,000 $2,650,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $o $2,600,000 $2,650,000 Total Costs: $0 $50,000 so SO $0 $2,600,000 $2,650,000 Impact on Operations: There will be disruptions when the existing grass is removed and new grass installed. However, once completed, maintenance and irrigation costs will be much lower. F 5 ,,... -- � ii � �nimummfim!oiilllillm - .I - RailroadCrossings Railroad Crossings are extremely expensive and infrequent projects, requiring large funding commitments, lengthy construction schedules and inevitably causing some inconvenience to the local community during the construction period. They are, however, also one of the best ways to ensure the safety of drivers, pedestrians and rail users by providing two separate crossings, thereby minimizing the possibility of train versus automobile, or train versus pedestrian accidents. Railroad Crossings are identified in the City's General Plan document, and they are also frequently illustrated in regional planning documents held by the County of San Bernardino, SANBAG and Caltrans. Project List& FY 2015-16 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2015-16 I. 6th St at BNSF Spur Crossing $50,000 $75 000 w/o Etiwanda Ave $650.0(410 2. Arrow Rte Railroad Spur— $75,000 New Concrete Panels 3. Hellman Avenue @ Metrol- $1,050,000 ink Tracks- Widen Crossing Total $1,175,000 $450,000 ■Citywide Infrastructure ■Transportation ■Gas Tax RT7360 G Project Number: 800-2015-18 JL Key: 1839 Object: 6th Street at BNSF Sour Crossing west of Etiwanda Avenge Project location: _r' nna L 6th Street at the BNSF spur track, ? m' ROJECT LOCATION. west of Etiwanda Avenue. i RAILROAD i I�h a 25�' ' Est.Construction Start/End: To be determined 6TH ST I• J � Project Status: ' Design J�+,ll+t SAWMARIN(rS _ Q z z I: Department: i Engineering s _, i a F115510N=.TSTA-UR m w i Project Manager: I �J I 9J 4TH ST Curt Billings Ei ' Description: Prepare preliminary design drawings and cost estimates for a grade crossing at 6th Street and the BNSF Railroad Spur. Justification: This project, if constructed, would complete 6th Street, between Santa Anita Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue,and provide better traffic circulation for the area. Project Cost Estimate($j: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017118 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 Design/Plan Review $24,360 $50,000 $0 50 50 50 $74,360 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $D $0 $0 $0 $o $0 ' Total Costs: $24,360 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $74,360 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Transportation Fund(124) $24,360 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $74,360 Total Costs: $24,360 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $74,360 Impact on Operations: None at this time. G1 Project Number: 800-2013-12 1L Key: 1819 Object: Arrow Route at Railroad Spur- New Concrete Panels 1 Project Location: Arrow Route at Railroad Spur west ' UY of Milliken Avenue — ~~� „ F_oIQ7F11LL_B1 V1DI— z c `` Zf �.I j 1 _l-ttfl=l-ENNIUyA�T ENZE "QR \ / = 1 PROJECT LOCATION '✓l F- f � I4�� S Est.Construction Start/End: v'�� / t SI ��--"Mil: 05/2016-07/2016 Ij > � – ARROII W R.T.E—� 1 Project Status: PI11.I Ma' p ,su r; i^fT:.Y.Ot171:nR W Design/Construction JIL ION C7-1;=3 Department: s— --j RSEYI'SL'V.Q _z_� FIRE-STATIQ Engineering 2 t74 Project Manager: 77 Romeo David 7 ' Description: Replace existing uneven rubber panels to concrete panels. ' Justification: The existing rubber panels are uneven and damaged due to heavy traffic used. Replacing with concrete panels will give a smoother ride and safer for vehicles. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 So $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 Inspection&Administration $o $9,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,000 Contingency $0 $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 1 Total Costs: $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 ' Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360 Fund(174) $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 I Total Costs: $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $D So $75,000 Impact on Operations: Uneven rubber creates damage along the edges of the existing asphalt pavement. This project will reduce maintenance for asphalt replacement. G2 Project Number: 800-2013-17 JL Key: 1847 Object: Hellman Avenue at Metrolink Tracks-Widen Crossing ' Project Location: Hellman Avenue at Metrolink s i LL Tracks(8th Street) klc ';—_—. F RISE-.ST P.r A'CER=ST �—QKUNOCT1STLA�I ER=ST� G�JPL=A�:E j Ca �FRIAN T_'S7 +CACL-EWEJAR�4�� LL �G_ f R SOURCE-CENTER- m > U n-aI E TSTT / Est.Construction StartEnd: W a7 1 .I Z SAL INA ST 04/2016-09/2016 s e s o c L W =9TF-ST—s = J z w =Q _ Project Status: � > � z LL �: C •� a a JAR SF.V-'Fi L'VD Design/Construction U�LL x _ ,a u I it y.�=�J to FERQlV-BL'YD Z Department: Engineering �� 1..., AT-IA-ST Project Manager: g _ RODE T LOCA ION Romeo David i T-TkrsT z—�—UIJ:ST--i ECIE.,VVUSSS1T I I I Description: Construction of traffic signal and widen the road at the Metrolink tracks. Justification: This project will improve the traffic flows,circulation and pedestrian safety due to a new traffic signal,wider road and sidewalks. in addition to the below costs for the street right-of-way improvements the Railroad and SANBAG are contributing an estimated$2.5 million towards the necessary railroad improvements required with the widening at the tracks. ' Project Cost Estimate(S): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL ' Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $250,000 $50,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $300,000 ' Right-of-Way $0 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction 50 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 Contingency $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Total Costs: $250,000 $1,050,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Transportation Fund(124) $250,000 $400,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $650,000 Citywide Infrastructure Fund(198) 50 $650,000 $0 50 $0 50 $650,000 Total Costs: $250,000 $1,050,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $1,300,000 I Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance. The estimated cost of electricity and maintenance for a traffic signal is$2,500 per year. In addition,the street widening,sidewalks and new pavement will mean less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. G3 won Streets Streets projects are the most common type of project undertaken by the City. The City receives annual funding from gasoline sales taxes for use on resurfacing projects for local arterial and residential streets in order to extend pavement life and improve driving conditions. Besides street rehabilitation projects, the City also undertakes many widening and extension projects as need dictates via new development, community needs and the City's General Plan. Project List& FY 2015-16 Expenditures Project List& FY 2015-16 Expenditures I. 4th St.,Archibald to Haven North Side $392,000 21. San Bernardino Rd.,Carnelian to $350,000 Pavement Rehab Archibald–Pavement Rehab 2. 7th St., Hellman to Archibald– $309,000 22. San Bernardino Rd.,Grove to $104,000 Pavement Rehab Foothill-Pavement Rehab 3. 9th St,Grove to Hellman- $25,000 23. Spruce Ave., Foothill to Base $600,000 Pavement Rehab Line–Pavement Rehab 4. Archibald Ave.,4th to Foothill, $1,100,000 24. Victoria St., Etiwanda to East $375,000 - Pavement Rehab City Limit–Widening&Rehab S. Archibald Ave., Hillside to North City $355,000 25. Youngs Canyon Rd.,Koch Place $100,000 Limit-Pavement Rehab to Cherry Ave.–St. Extension 6. Arrow Rte.,along s/s 500'-1300'w/o 1 $20,000 Total $13,492,805 -I5 freeway-Pavement Rehab 7. Base Line Rd atl-15 Interchange $5,201,805 B. Base Line Rd., Milliken to w/o Day $30,000 Creek Blvd-Pavement Rehab Sources of Funding for FY 2015-16 9. Carnelian St., Lemon Ave to Wilson $468,000 Ave-Pavement Rehab 10.Church St., Pepper-Hellman– $25,000 c,,npn npn Pavement Rehab $3951,805 11.Etiwanda Ave.,6th St.to Arrow Rte- $450,000 $1,64 ,000 Widening 12. Foothill Blvd.,SCE Corridor west of $145,000 Day Creek Channel,Sidewalk $475,000 13. Foothill Blvd.,Archibald to Haven- $707,000 Pavement Rehab $392,000 14.Foothill Blvd.,Vineyard to Archibald- $611,000 _ $400,000 Pavement Rehab $100,000 15.Haven Ave.,Banyan to Wilson- $220,000 $175,000 Sidewalk $3,449, 00 16.Haven Ave.,Wilson to North City $480,000 $1,903,000 Limit-Pavement Rehab 17.Hellman Ave.,San Bernardino Rd to $25,000 Base Line Rd-Pavement Rehab - Citywide Infrastructure AD 88-2 18.Hillside Rd.,Archibald to Haven- $25,000 Gas Tax R&T 7360 -General Fund Pavement Rehab -Measure 1(177) -Prop 19 19. Local Streets Pavement Rehab $1,250,000 -Measure I(176) Transportation 20. Madrone Ave.,north of 9th St: $125,000 ®Fire Capital Projects SAFE-LU(Federal) MWzJ Widening H Project Number: 800-2013-03 JL Key: 1853 Object: 4th Street from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue-North Side Pavement Rehabilitation Project location: I —raalN:s.r OLD TORK 4th Street from Archibald Avenue —I,ua�sOur=nve� 3 N 8'TAV: '' e to Haven Avenue 71 W IND.IANA4 CT j 14 C�W—A-CA-CIA-ST-1 C C (--W Y. 2 s '4.--7-T �% a M:S- EI:P � W Est.Construction Start/End: OWST OOK:sT > 08/2015—10/2015I'D ems , Z n U= ' Project status: NS UR i PROJECT LOCA OITCA N� 1 Construction =3� MaI:TH JFiNf.ST' 'a EMP1kE L Department: Engineering I` a �U s ' Project Manager: Romeo David 3 ' Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and therefore eligible and submitted for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expend iture/Catesory Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 SO $D $0 $0 1 Design/Plan Review $20,000 $0 So $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Construction $0 $320,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $320,000 Inspection&Administration $o $40,000 so $0 50 $0 $40,000 Contingency $0 $32,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,000 Total Costs: $20,000 $392,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $412,000 Project Funding: Fundine Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Measure I Fund(176) $10,000 $392,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $402,000 IMeasure I Fund(177) $10,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $10,000 Total Costs: $20,000 $392,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $412,000 I Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. I I H1 Number: Project � 800 2014-04 IL Key: 1876 Object: 7th Street from Heilman Avenue to Archibald Avenue- Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: II ll 7th Street from Hellman Avenue to .>I V �— Archibald Avenue d Ui PROJECT LOCATION 4 ^AC%CC;Ii Est.Construction Start/End: W.� ¢� 08/2015-10/2015 _m �. w Project Status: _ sfY—W EDEEWE Construction % a Z Department: ?. �' Z g _JR$ 1 7 v p G a�EER6r315ISh=�.`.r EngineeringizsvrsrJa^' 111 J J l f L�,E�cr=w J Project Manager: 't Y Romeo David 5 f � LDE ARrc HANVF-7VIRTADR F ' Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible and submitted for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $14,340 $0 SO $0 $o $0 $14,340 Right-of-Way $o $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Inspection&Administration 5o $34,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,000 Contingency $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $o SO $25,000 Total Costs: $14,340 $309,000 50 $0 $0 50 $323,340 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $14,340 $309,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $323,340 ' Total Costs: $14,340 $309,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $323,340 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to ' attend to other needed areas. H2 Project Number: 800-2015-09 JL Key: 1904 1 Object: 9th Street from Grove Avenue to Hellman Avenue-Pavement Rehabilitation Project location: 9th Street from Grove Avenue to pPG _ o� II cL/ uu_; �i f__ ���'� J G - Hellman Avenue P�` > I B R GULCH I P.CA'GI fir' Q \\ LLj ELLMENTARYI W > K N�t-SSI —Q BEAR GIl1LGIH•PKRK�J` j W Q V 2 G •J I Est.Construction Start/End: LU Lns AEJII S o 06/2017-08/2017 a ELErdENTAf—a_z 0 u Vf WIN Project Status: a z (F1I1VFJ Design } MA10 >" C6' Department: u 7NN EngineeringPROJECT LOCATIOProject Manager: „-n,_ST �- Romeo David i I Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 Design/Plan Review 5o $25,000 So $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $o $0 $o $0 $o ' Construction 50 $0 $266,000 50 $0 $0 $266,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $0 $7,500 50 $0 $0 $7,500 Contingency $o 50 $26,500 $0 $0 $0 $26,500 ITotal Costs: $0 $25,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $325,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 $25,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $325,000 Total Costs: so $25,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $325,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. I I H3 Project Number: 800-2013-09 1L Key: 1852 Object: Archibald Avenue from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard -Pavement Rehabilitation ' Project Location: — —i I v - _ T L-�'J:':uar rl� _J FOOTHI 191lyn Archibald Avenue from 4th StreetFR to Foothill Boulevard If ;i � _ P—j J L__ jLJ'_s� s a—_—I .... '1 0LUf�T ' IJ� i-wcFn. ^-�- G ' Est.Construction Start/End: 5 x t — 08/2015—10/2015 JL,,— ST' ST.. Rr, � R.w.Rx ....._. _ 1�--�_•, g ��I Project Status: T PROJECT LOC�t1T10 __... .,T.._..... .. Construction L_ Department: aEnL � Engineering , 1 21QI J( I R y, w� w:Nw� _• srl (.` � Cisn RG L�aK[3 Gq. V Project IManager I ": ��IJ`^ 4TH STREET Romeo David Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. ' Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible and submitted for a CalRecycle rebate. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 S0 $0 $0 $o ' Design/Plan Review $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Right-of-way 50 $0 $0 $0 $o $o $o Construction $0 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 Inspection&Administration So $55,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $55,000 Contingency s0 $95,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 ' Total Costs: $50,000 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,150,000 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Measure I Fund(177) $50,000 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,150,000 Total Costs: $50,000 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,150,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to ' other needed areas. I H4 ' Project Number: 800-2013-10 JL Key: 1727 ' Object: Archibald Avenue from Hillside Road to North City Limit- Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: j Archibald Avenue from Hillside —•---•—••- Road to North City Limit 1? i � f�-J�ALupNR41 II�ttEriRU'.ftCfDL't5il I C ' i� C Est.Construction Start/End: 1 ��IhtU I rl WR - 04/2016-06/2016 � yw Project Status: PROJECT LOCATION---I�=-7�- , :Nr R•.vaor>;�N '15niRta:4br_ t� ���< Construction17 _- 'IZ'-wo R.OR 't il'i ' Department: Ici tEF.R'VR Engineering �" '^F✓+%,yo oR 1 n a cKcaw en I J�LJ — nTtONI 4. I I j Project Manager: , p Romeo David Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible and submitted for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 50 ' Design/Plan Review $16,720 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,720 Right-of-Way $0 So $o $0 $0 $o So ' Construction $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $25,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Contingency $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 ITotal Costs: $16,720 $355,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $371,720 Project Funding: IFunding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/19 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Measure I Fund(177) $16,720 $355,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $371,720 Total Costs: $16,720 $355,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $371,720 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H5 1 Project Number: 800-2015-14 1L Key: 1907 Object: Arrow Route along the South side 500'to 1300' east of the Interstate 1-15 freeway-widening Project Location: ' 1`1 L(t F.TST L-A= VFRSAi1-L'E SIS•T Arrow Route along the South side o w ST 500' to 1300' east of the I-15 lL4 ii: I I CMLI<VII-SP freeway ��� i y/ NNIUWJTJj EPI CENT SPORTS CSIdPLEX• /�r A O s Est.Construction Start/End: �. RANCHO CUCAMtNGA ADULTS ORTS COMPLEX •, TBD I -%'CK'RF.NNY_nR 1 -;� RC ANIMAL CARE AADOPTION ENTER Project Status: �I • I I�%�`�/ —oRErotix7rt Design Iz r ---Department: ---'W. Engineering PROJECT LOCATION Project Manager: Curt Billings Description: This project involves 800 feet of asphalt pavement widening and striping. Justification: This project will improve traffic circulation and safety with the addition of a second lane and paved shoulders. 1 Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $268,000 $268,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,000 $27,000 ' Total Costs: $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $320,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) SO $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $320,000 ' Total Costs: $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $320,000 Impact on Operations: None. H6 Project Number: 800-2007-21 JL Key: 1361 Object: ' Base Line Road at 1-15 Interchange Project Location: y Base Line Road at the I-15 r--,r,;[.;� _I: ^. Freeway 0. eRJ1e[tYlp ,I� I I P-A IE Est.Construction Start/End: Li i xe xo 07/2014-07/2016 ..— Project Status: Construction t' Department: ROJECT LOCATION' Engineering Project Manager: Jason Welday Description: Construction of a modification to the on and off ramps for the 1-15 Freeway at Base Line Road. Justification: Due to the current and projected congestion of the streets around the interchange,it is necessary to improve access to and from the 1-15 freeway at Base Line Road. Up to 50 percent of the project costs are eligible for reimbursement through Federal funds. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPOES $1,091.060 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $1,091,060 Design/Plan Review $5,206,930 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $5,206,930 Right-of-Way $7,161,201 $50,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $7,211.201 Construction $34,695,730 $5,151,805 $0 50 $0 $0 $39,847,535 Total Costs: $48,154,921 $5,201,805 $0 $0 $0 $0 $53,356,726 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Year 2015/16 2016/1 2017/18 2019/19 2019/2 TOTAL Transportation(124) $4,013,310 $250,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $4,263,310 RDA(660) $10,137,690 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10.137,690 Tax Allocation Bonds $29,851,545 $0 So $0 $0 $0 $29,851,545 City Infrastructure(198) $299,774 $0 $o $0 $o $0 $299,774 General Fund(001) $18,996 50 $0 50 $0 $o $18,996 RDA(650) $3,771 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $3,771 Subtotal City Budget Costs: $44,325,086 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,575,086 I IMD/BDP(Federal) $1,179,835 50 $0 50 $0 $0 $1,179,835 SAFETEA-LU(Federal)(209) $2,650,000 $3,951,805 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,601,805 Prop-1B-SLPP(State)(211) $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Subtotal Other Costs: $3,829,835 $4,951,805 $o $0 $0 $o $8,781,640 Grand Total Costs: $48,154,921 $5,201,805 $0 $o $0 $0 $53,356,726 e Impact on Operations: City is expected to take over maintenance of the landscaping within the interchange. Area of landscaping has not yet been determined. H7 Project Number: 800-2015-07 1L Key: 1880 Object: Base Line Road from Milliken Avenue to w/o Day Creeek Boulevard -Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: I _ Base Line Road from Milliken 1 �'I� '~/�J i ��nu �� �� 1N _, 1 << J I Avenue to w/o Day Creek ?. L r YON PA' K I�U 4 �{ -_ J�•V]M Boulevard :J��=1r " I� �.��r} ' ` RSA CNO CVCAMO G4 DRd- ..fUkl GROV S"1P,ARK. f /�.A'l�f'(r�� ATA -•-VIC7 Rb 4�iJ�14JLWIND RO EL MEN• 1 �R� J _ . RY-- ����' r11`'\11 VCi KIZ.TAR �!/� � S,_� %'`•G A`RLTON P "'Till 1 `�'1� S IIJ_J( 5 {\�1 � �r r SS I+71I(rlli{I� - lr1 t'�il� C PANG IFI(h LE�C'1 R.,;. q[�^' "1'''Iit TATION�^I'--"-'� -��- Est.Construction Start/End: I1 �i 1 yf I 08/2016-10/2016 1/ ��llie��rl A ��rLIL� IJ �� CMO CUCAMONGA CENTRAL PAR ; I Project Status: Design EC11I O\��\ C�c:S�4�RKE�am�M� ...i, !JAli�l—IIVIG_T.�JX 4 itI T.RRAV II_lAi Project Number: 800-2013-13 JL Key: 1722 Object: Carnelian Street from Lemon Avenue to Wilson Avenue-Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Carnelian Street from Lemon `��•, r I, � ver �-�>� Avenue to Wilson Avenue JN It Est.Construction Start/End: I li PROJECT LOCATION 06/2016-08/2016 `—�� r -""rea H^R N a a I I I la t I ProjectStatus: 'i� �iII I , ^I nI�La la I�� I> it la I i ��n, cryvnr y— Design/Construction J J Ir_!�� I —1 —¢--__tit.=..+_ r.Yn?Gilg,.•1' '1�1 'a l �J, 4a uil.i u'E cr (� ✓ ;GS I Department: Engineering i l NI_•= 17 Is 4 Fzi J�I IQ� ^✓ Project Manager: 4.f:L 1=J"LJo�J �-1 —v=a g iz €— —A Romeo David Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Design/Plan Review 50 50 $0 $0 50 50 S0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $o Construction $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $28,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,000 Contingency $o $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 Total Costs: $0 $468,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $468,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Measure I Fund(177) $0 $468,000 $0 $0 $0 $O $468,000 Total Costs: 50 $468,000 $0 $0 50 $O $468,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H9 Project Number: 800-2015-10 JL Key: 1906 Object: Church Street from Pepper Street to Hellman Avenue -Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: I jig C�l1PEP;;tR•S1'I= a'.AUK � iuu.lw.ion sr Chruch Street from Pepper Street to Hellman Avenue I J `ter Q.t F.[lFl PRO reo ........... I........... / Ili PROJEION,C�:LOCA IiiL�CJ S. _ a t Est.Construction Start/End: YF° T '1?;% 06/2017-08/2017 lri-z' V l� ` V. Project Status: I la-�n J LA Design � � . N::" '�� /�----� �J�,.LMcaK.s.:� Department: Engineering �� :/ � I^ o i, !? •—J�—,- � 1 II IIII MARi%- --. I J A. Project Manager: �' 13� J LJ I� eLcy1\ •,� I x ���I S� ��L n„ Hn'UIS.A;��u �<^J r— IRE STAT Romeo David iiB nsrn1-l:D.J�a Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. 1 Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Design/Plan Review $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Right-of-Way $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Construction $0 $0 $286,000 $0 $0 $0 $286,000 Inspection&Administration $0 50 $7,500 50 50 $0 $7,500 Contingency $0 $0 $28,500 $0 $0 I 50 $28,500 Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $322,000 $0 $0 $0 $347,000 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) 50 $25,000 $322,000 $0 $0 $0 $347,000 I Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $322,000 $0 $0 $0 $347,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. I I H10 Project Number: 800-2010-15 JL Key: 1076 ' Object: Etiwanda Avenue Street Improvements from 6th Street to Arrow Route ' Project Location: Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route _,AJR.RQW-RT �I r tiNROYJ=RSE Est.Construction Start/End: o v.n r:rrll ernvE ' ;PROJECT IO LOCATN 05/2016-08/2016 J i7J gd �j ' Project Status: I 1 � i —�- -- --••_•.i Design/Construction '. —=�— 1J W r. ysi , 6TH ST Department: Jr. Engineering i 1 I `+' IM:RiNO:S I . j� Project Manager: —W � Curt Billings (� Z Description: Widen Etiwanda Avenue to two lanes in each direction,from 6th Street to Whittram Avenue including bike lanes from 6th Street to Arrow Route. ' Justification: Widening Etiwanda Avenue will improve traffic circulation. ' Project Cost Estimate(S): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Design/Plan Review 50 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 50 $o 50 50 $0 Construction $0 $390,000 $0 $0 50 $o $390,000 Inspection&Administration 5o 510,000 So $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Contingency $0 $30,000 $0 $o $0 SO 530,000 ' Total Costs: $0 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Transportation Fund(124) $0 $225,000 5o $0 $0 $0 $225,000 Infrastructure Fund(198) So $225,000 $0 S0 S0 $0 $225,000 Total Costs: $0 $450,000 So $0 So $0 $450,000 ' Impact on Operations: Reduction of routine maintenance activities for pothole repair, weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews for other needed areas. I I H11 ' Project Number: 800-2012-07 1L Key: 1826 Object: Foothill Boulevard across SCE Corridor West of Day Creek Channel-Sidewalk Improvements Project Location: 'y��" rG�.•= I ` EOV�j I CUL-.L'RAL7CLN�'F.R'DR� Foothill Boulevard across SCE � uCorridor west of Day Creek � a � 1CLL INolilri,:r�gINF:TREETw w Channel U y a' LII 7 4L,? / [/l'_c�N:,R\NICK1IIs r ��L S z �Ef'FLMEI7 < Y w lJ II ;� D ., II " II,RSE%ST j=VE SAIL'L't S'--S'P•�// �i TAF FgRI DI S t - I ':HERVIUs:u VI U.0 A_GARD.ENS_LN� Est.Construction Start/End: w I U r� �/� 05/2016-06/2016 Z FOOTHILL BLVD r Project Status: 1 / Design/Construction •;��i Department: j �PROJECT MCA, N j g g En Ineerin IL:BENNY_ui J Project Manager: � i !F• Romeo David I, � �/ ARRO:N.R.T.E Description: This project will install 600 feet of sidewalk to close the gap between two existing sections of sidewalk. Justification: This project was requested by handicap residents using this route everyday.The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation as well as bring the area into ADA compliance. ' Project Cost Estimate($j: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $10,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Right-of-Way $25,000 $0 So $0 $0 $0 $25,000 1 Construction $0 $110,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $110,000 Inspection&Administration SO $14,000 so 50 $0 50 $14,000 Contingency 5o 511,000 $0 $0 $0 5o $11,000 Total Costs: $25,000 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 Project Funding: IFunding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL City Widelnfastructure Fund(198) $25,000 $145,000 $0 $o $0 $o $170,000 I Total Costs: $25,000 $145,000 $0 $0 50 50 $170,000 Impact on Operations: This project will reduce maintenance and weed abatement costs from General Fund and LIVID 3B. i H12 Project Number: 800-2015-05 1L Key: 1881 0 bj ed: Foothill Boulevard from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue-Pavement Rehabilitation Project II Foothill Boulevard from Vineyard LUUUUUUUU I _J( U Avenue to Archibald Avenue a J IR „ T� 1 'U , IFIRES TATUD �U7� Est.Construction Start/End: 08/2015-10/2015 ��--. --�� z Project Status: Design/ConstructionLJUULJU U Unca U15 _Z_IVIC-GEN7E =DR'�� Department: i� �' Engineering - !!I (��� � ROJECT 1.0�CATION U _I. Project Manager: I��—�� �UIjUn Romeo David I I Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. ' Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 8 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $30,000 5o $0 So $0 $30,000 Right-of-Way SO So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $590,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $590,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $28,000 50 50 $0 $0 $28,000 Contingency 50 $59,000 50 $0 $0 $0 559,000 Total Costs: $0 $707,000 $o $o $0 $0 $707,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Infrastructure Fund(198) $0 $677,000 $0 So $0 $0 $677,000 IMeasure I Fund(177) 50 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Total Costs: $0 $707,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $707,000 ' Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H13 Project Number: 800-2013-14 1L Key: 1855 _ Object: Foothill Boulevard from Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue- Pavement Rehabilitation o 77,4 LJ Foothill Boulevard from Vineyard �L``� I Avenue to Archibald Avenue rZ I} ' a �� r i ��o�/� N"I.Lt Est.Construction Start/End: ��� / \�JIT C J )� FIRE-Sr2 ne- Q n J I UU F77 08/2015 10/2015 / > L(- Z �I i JZJ-- a > �u (— ' —_ I .�tiCvu—� Project Status: �I,�I FOOTHILL BLVD Construction -IF r I I IU Department: � t l� P:ROJECT!�t0� T Engineering ION�� W --� �;J , �L Project Manager: Romeo David ARROW ROUTE (�CT�I' Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible and submitted for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 So $0 $0 $0 $o SO Design/Plan Review 515,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 515,000 Right-of-Way $0 $o $0 $0 $0 5o $0 Construction $o $520,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $520,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $39,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $39,000 Contingency 50 $52,000 50 $0 $0 50 $52,000 ' Total Costs: $15,000 $611,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $626,000 Project Funding: _Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Measure I Fund(177) $15,000 $611,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $626,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $611,000 $0 $0 $0 $O $626,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H14 Project Number: 800-2013-32 1L Key: 1864 Object: Haven Avenue from Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue along the East side-Sidewalk Project Location: I u� W w '`J-- I f East side of Haven Avenue from = '-J� r nILL'SIOL'RD�7i Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue �;�? IL ROJECT LOCATION JJ617 =P i, — wItSON=avt;-��� Ili f� c Est.Construction Start/End: �j 06/2016-08/2016 J TION Project Status: I TSTA Construction -1 1 r BANYANST i ✓ nn Department: —� 'I Engineering d� it II � f- r-�I 1 Y� Project Manager: i7 �r , 0 �I �-;� l� ,l Curt Billings Description: The proposed sidewalk along east side of Haven Avenue will fill a gap where sidewalks are missing and provide improved ADA access to Chaffey College. Justification: This project is part of the City Master Plan.The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation and ADA compliance. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Design/Plan Review $3,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,950 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $192,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $192,000 Inspection&Administration $o $9,000 So So 5o $0 $9,000 Contingency $0 $19,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,000 Total Costs: $3,950 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $223,950 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $3,950 $220,000 $0 $0 SO $0 $223,950 Total Costs: $3,950 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $223,950 Impact on Operations: None. H15 Project Number: 800-2013-16 1L Key: 1854 Object: Haven Avenue from Wilson Avenue to North City Limit- Pavement Rehabilitation ..�......�..��r..�..�um.s..�..�..� �r"`TA'C:K STE $ �..mv�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�.. Project location: M!' �S' Haven Avenue from Wilson Avenue to North City Limit N gT'A•RRARI-S.T. ::)A,. 0�PROJECT LOCATION Est.Construction Start/End: vl�.r' A-rlR E: --�% ���t;�•��:t� �� _ ! 04/2016-06/2016 �] ! -�� CJA�ARANni4�C:.t' �—VfvIENU Project Status: J5 £-Rp L Construction W� � 'I+ I 1Jortico-PlIt ..A7CRrr l) �_ yl W .YRU_L-A CAPRI UI,� � W Ic- � BEECH'N�ODU-URS,n 7 Department: L„L,JR-S—? Q i Engineering y vvIv50N=AVEC Ci,NE-141uL R=DR (I s RID Project Manager: SrA D D LIF S:l l:. Romeo David I I _Jf�v.i'NI FR.CT AN'nt"nrA-,�� Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible and submitted for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Construction $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $400,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $40,000 50 $0 $0 $o $40,000 Contingency $0 $40,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $40,000 ' Total Costs: $0 $480,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $480,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Measure I Fund(177) $0 $480,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $480,000 Total Costs: $0 $480,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $480,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H16 1 Project Number: 800-2015-11 JL Key: 1905 1 Object: Hellman Avenue from San Bernardino Road to Base Line Road - Pavement Rehabilitation W 1 Project Location: _ — z _ ti� L--] Hellman Avenue from San EfAE LIN .R r Bernardino Road to Base Line Road � � ��LI F, zi, J Est.Construction Start/End: > �,1—�` // Fli I 06/2017-08/2017 ��'�� ��f�� �L `� o �1 F2," _� _a te _ CHAR I' �-- \ a/ UILII I C lU`I�JOT 1 Project Status: \�'�/ Design I , �.� � �' IIJftOJEC.T LOG 'in . �•% I ' FIRE=5�TATION 1 Department: Engineering �; � 2: Project Project Manager: 1?SLT1ILC Romeo David l �I l(—Inn F':!'—fl 1 Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. 1 Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle rebate. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $0 $0 So $0 $0 1 Design/Plan Review $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Construction $0 $o $286,000 SO $0 $0 $286,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $7,500 50 $0 $0 $7,500 Contingency $0 50 $28,500 5o $0 5o $28,500 Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $322,000 $0 50 $0 $347,000 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 $25,000 $322,000 $0 $0 50 $347,000 Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $322,000 $0 $0 $0 $347,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. I H17 Project Number: 800-2015-06 1L Key: 1879 ' Object: Hillside Road from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue-Pavement Rehabilitation ' Project Location: I.UU `I ' Hillside Road from Archibald r �� Avenue to Haven Avenue rU L iU� I U�UZW.-� /P LLJ= IL 1�7 1Est.Construction Start/End: 06/2017-08/2017 c%•, r—^ -J� Project Status: �! f� —� Design a _ _ IL �ti'II:SUN:AVE�z_U��� Department: Engineering 11U✓_ROJECT LOCATION Project Manager: �•, IL / I I =�U�•••ir� I ^! Romeo David J Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle rebate. ' Project Cost Estimate($j: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 525,000 $0 50 $0 5o $25,000 Right-of-way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $760,000 $0 50 $0 $760,000 Inspection&Administration 50 50 $15,000 $0 $0 50 $15,000 Contingency $0 $0 $75,000 50 $0 50 $75,000 1 Total Costs: $0 $25,000 5850,000 $0 $0 50 $875,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) 50 $25,000 $850,000 $0 $0 5o $875,000 Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $875,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to ' attend to other needed areas. I IH18 Project Number: 800-2014-03 JL Key: 1022 Object: Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation at Various Locations Project Location: Various Locations Li-rri=:Z—, I P wUu d Est.Construction Start/End: -4. Pic 5/2016—7/2016 LANE- r Project Status: S Design/Construction j C T Department: T —7 M H'57 Engineering F-TH-S-1 - 8TH r Project Manager: Romeo David Description: This project involves slurry seals and asphalt concrete overlays. Justification: This project if a slurry seal will seal the street thus extending the pavement life and if a pavement overlay will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES so $0 so so so $0 $o Design/Plan Review $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 so $o $60,000 Right-of-Way $o $0 $0 so $o $0 so Construction $800,000 $1,060,000 so $0 $0 $0 $1,860,000 Inspection&Administration 549,000 $50,000 $o $0 $o $0 $99,000 Contingency $80,000 $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $190,000 Total Costs: $959,000 $1,250,000 so $0 $0 $0 $2,209,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL General Fund(001) $0 $400,000 so $0 $0 $0 $400,000 Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $850,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,700,000 Prop 42 Fund(190) $109,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $109,000 Total Costs: $959,000 $1,250,000 $o so $o $0 $1,809,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H19 Project Number: 800-2012-30 1L Key: 1818 Object: Madrone Avenue North of 9th Street-Widening 1 Project Location: Madrone Avenue North of 9th T i- 1 Street IPROJ@CT LOCATION y 3 I- � Y• � S W r_ARROri-RTE— c � q I` v Y F w {I 2 s Est.Construction Start/End: W ' (_— —'© 4 04/2016-06/2016 Los AMIGOS a ELEMENTARY Project Status: �s Design/Construction 9TH- T Q Department: Y �cr d Engineering F �HAFFLL--�O���ar 1.1piN_.ti`T LL Project Manager: Curt Billings ' Description: This project adds 320 linear feet of street widening and three street lights along the frontage of the new Southwest Park that will be constructed concurrently. ' Justification: This project will provide ADA accessibility and improve pedestrian and vehicle safety along the steet frontage of the new Southwest Park. 1 Project Cost Estimate($�: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 tDesign/Plan Review $o $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $o 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 5110,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Contingency $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $10,000 ' Total Costs: $0 $125,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $125,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360(174) $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $125,000 Total Costs: $0 $125,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $125,000 Impact on Operations: This project adds three street lights to Street Light Maintenace districts SLD 2 and SLD 6. I IH 20 Project Number: 800-2014-09 IL Key: 1877 Object: San Bernardino Road from Carnelian Street to Archibald Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation -.J.2 Project Location: San Bernardino Road from J-1 L Carnelian Street to Archibald Avenue 4 R4% C= L ,I I Est.Construction Start/End: 06/2016-08/2016 WIN..... I Project Status: Construction ................... ........ ]VULk—L LN Department: PROJECT LOCATION Engineering -hEaLc (D -1 3 o Project Manager: Romeo David Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. Project Cost Estimate Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Invironmental/NPIDIS $0 $0 so so $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $18,960 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $18,960 Right-of-Way $0 so $o $0 $0 so so Construction so $300,000 $0 $0 $0 so $300,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Contingency $0 530,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Total Costs: $18,960 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $368,960 Projecl,lundin,: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $18,960 $175,000 so $0 so $0 $193,960 Fire Protection Capital Fund(288) $0 $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 Total Costs: 518,960 $350,000 $0 $0 so $0 $368,960' Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H21 Project Number: 800-2015-08 JL Key: 1903 Object: San Bernardino Road from Grove Avenue to Foothill Boulevard - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: San Bernardino Road from Grove � E !� '•.� Avenue to Foothill Boulevard ROJECT LOCATION W -----.Z�THILL LVD Est.Construction Start/End: _ 06/2016-08/2016 I4N 3'eR APDINO RD r�4 1 � YIr1F1.l Yl CIR Project Status Construction I p.'.avt 1F PF�`Itjp I J Department: W Engineering i— �'VFiIIUA.V crJR�s ' z C" ` EC . FZSVY"P.TE� Project Manager: Romeo David Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Contingency $0 $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 ITotal Costs: $0 $104,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $104,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 $104,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $104,000 Total Costs: $0 $104,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $104,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to Iattend to other needed areas. I I H 22 ' Project Number: 800-2014-05 JL Key: 1878 Object: Spruce Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base line Road - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Nliffil It_I I ILAyWSpruce Avenue from Foothill ___1CJBq IEIL�IHe"RO Boulevard to Base Line RaodL Est.Construction Start/End: O 06/2016-08/2016JLL 2�' Project Status: } n Construction a :0 f\ PROJECT LOCATION: Department: D Engineering D AJ � w Project Manager: ww FooZ. LU Romeo David F-_' ' Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible and submitted for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expend iture/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 .2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review 517,932 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $17,932 Right-of-Way $0 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Construction $0 $531,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $531,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Contingency $0 $54,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $54,000 Total Costs: $17,932 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $617,932 Project Funding: IFunding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Infrastructure Fund(198) $17,932 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $617,932 Total Costs: $17,932 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $617,932 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. I H 23 Project Number: 800-2013-21 JL Key: 1838 0 bj ect: Victoria Street from Etiwanda Avenue to East City Limits-Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation project Location: Victoria Street from Etiwanda � -� Avenue to East City Limit � I��,�.•:J L;iT.DNI;G- `;iU3LTE • `.\� o is I+i 1R,� I n Z i• a w m L, R lv jN CEear_ s A. -++ I I l a I,I I �S.,N1JY..E,S ij�NF"�Lrc = Est.Construction Start/End: 05/2016-07/2016T1Cs7� IL i ROJEdT LOCA ION Project Status: ` t TIWANDA I CS.4rF- �.Avf HIGH Construction n / Department: � __............. I....-....�_.. ,ij i VICTORIA ST j ,;! ,•�' Engineering --D l� f.A9LL.u.LLM ct TWAND i ( Rin O IN 7ERR�EDIA�7E // Project Manager: � ��7n�cico7'r¢n�•=� ` II Jr` �/ Curt S Billing Description: This project involves,curb and gutter,sidewalks,including a sidewalk on the north side under the Freeway,asphalt pavement,cold planning,asphalt concrete overlay,pavement striping and flashing beacon for the pedestians crossing the street at Etiwanda High School. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending the pavement life,use,and rideability. The project will also add sidewalks and a flashing beacon for improved pedestrian access to two local schools. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $28,890 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,890 Right-of-Way 5o $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $335,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $335,500 Inspection&Administration $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Contingency $0 $34,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,500 Total Costs: $28,890 $375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $403,890 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Transportation Fund(124) $13,890 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,890 Measure I Fund(176) $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Measure I Fund(177) $0 $375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $375,000 ' Total Costs: $28,890 $375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $403,890 Impact on Operations: Will reduce routine maintenance costs for pothole and crack repairs. H 24 Project Number: 800-2012-22 1L Key: 1601 Object: Youngs Canyon Road -Extension from Koch Place to Cherry Avenue Project Location: Youngs Canyon Road-Koch Place 3 to Cherry Avenue 3: � J .V.E r�rLVIL"S�ON't.1V,E`� I LRUFiEL-I:HCF:DR. FR:7�S1 ILW1 Ill1 �TO 4 / F'cS.DR / Est.Construction Start/End: RANGH()51 11 Nl�IT:PARK /� li4 P I X tip// MF'VL F.RSON-nRFF' f 7o be determined ETtwA NDA:REEK COiara VNI TY PARK 1\ �1` 0 / I�1' .C1LNE R VE-P`ARK— Project Status: nrc:r:crc�r � � � •i � Design 1 1I o 2 DR'7 v Z n a rASSIA ST G: PSULI DR .!!/ Department: F / Engineering ICKASA'N RD PROJECT LOCATION y 1RD Project Manager: n FISFIERT1.� a. Curt Billings JORDAN;, J � n II II II .`r Description: The extension of Youngs Canyon Road between Koch Place and Cherry Avenue will construct a 4 lane road across a flood control basin and master plan its extension to Cherry Avenue. Justification: This extension of Youngs Canyon Road will construct 1100 foot segment across an existing flood control basin enabling future development east of the the basin to complete the remaining 400 foot extension to Cherry Avenue.When completed the new road will relieve traffic congestion on Wilson Avenue to the north. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPOES $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Design/Plan Review $249,166 $100,000 $70,000 $o $0 50 5419,166 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Construction $0 $0 $2,600,000 $D $0 $0 $2,600,000 Inspection&Administration So 5o 550,000 so 5o So $50,000 Contingency $0 $0 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $280,000 Total Costs: $249,166 $100,000 53,150,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,499,166 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 201617 201718 201819 TBD TOTAL AD 88-2 Etiw/Highlnd Impry(813) $249,166 $100,000 $3,150,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,499,166 MTotal Costs: 5249,166 $100,000 $3,150,000 $0 50 $0 $3,499,166 Impact on Operations: Adds 1,100 feet of roadway to the City's street maintenance program.A more detailed cost estimate will be available after the preliminary design phase is complete. H 25 IIS,r " , ti: Traffic ' Projects included in this section.are typically those that will promote safe and efficient traffic circulation per State and local design standards. Planned projects include two new signals, and upgrades at three intersections, synchronization at three freeway interchanges, and prepa- ration of an ITS master plan.. Traffic Projects are typically funded via Transportation Development Funds (124), Measure 1 (177), Gas Tax Funds (170, 172, and 174), Street Lighting Districts and some grant funding. Project List & FY 201 S-16 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2015-16 I. 6th St. @ Utica Ave-Traffic Signal $287,500 $1 2 810 Installation 2. Base Line Rd/Lion St- Pedestrian $100,000 Hybrid Beacon 3. Carnelian St.@ Banyan St.- $280,000 Traffic Signal Installation 4. Freeway and Arterial Signal Syn- $317,810 chronization at various intersec- tions $1,272.500 S. Intelligent Transportation System $300,000 Upgrade-Citywide 11 6. Milliken Ave Traffic Signals—Up $100,000 grade Left Turn Phases Total $1,385,310 ■ AB 2766 Air Quality ■ Transportation Project Number: 800-2014-12 JL Key: 1889 Object: 6th Street at Utica Avenue-Traffic Signal Installation ' Project Location: Sixth Street and Utica Avenue u METRCUL•fNK-STATION R �ET �ATfO 7--TMST `�^��r EM1 PIRE LAKES GOLF COURSIIIIE_ Est.Construction Start/End: 3/2016—5/2016 J > Q Project Status: l U Design/Construction EMPIRE LAKES GOLF COURSE > I J a Department: fff i � Engineering tTM•5.T—, J) �..�.._..�..��..�.. �..�..�..e.�..e.._..� ..�.q:���S�T...�..�L.� Project Manager: Jason Welday Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,installation of traffic signals and related equipment at Sixth Street and Utica Avenue. ' Justification: The installation of traffic signals will improve traffic safety and reduce traffic congestion. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 50 Design/Plan Review $12,500 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Right-of-Way So So $o $o $0 $0 $o Construction $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $250,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $5,000 $o $0 50 50 $5,000 Contingency $o $25,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $25,000 ' Total Costs: $12,500 $287,500 $0 $o $0 $0 $300,000 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Transportation(124) $12,500 $287,500 $o $0 $0 $0 $300,000 ITotal Costs: $12,500 $287,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance.The estimated cost of electricity and ' maintenance for a traffic signal is$2,500 per year. I Project Number: 800-2015-24 JL Key: xxxx Object: Base line Road and Lion Street-Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon(HAWK) Installation Project Location: Q I r Base Line Road at Lion Street R IRF ■oO RD%ST LL f JECT LOCATION \��\''•\ BASE LINE RD Est.Construction Start/End: —� 10/2015—11/2015 i _ LIONS PARKj�- ' Project Status: v s PI:R rRxi Design/Construction I — I I i /, j2S1 ex Department: ' l ALDER ST Engineering \,• �J - 'a Project Manager: �I Q Jason Welday l % j I x Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,installation of a pedestrian hybrid beacon(HAWK) and related equipment at Base Line Road and Lion Street. Justification: The project will improve pedestrian safety. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Design/Plan Review $o $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Right-of-Way $o $0 $0 $0 $0 5o $0 Construction 50 $80,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 ' Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $o Contingency $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: 50 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017 18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Transportation(124) $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Total Costs: $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible for the cost of electricity and maintenance. The estimated cost of electricty and maintenance for a pedestrian hybrid beacon is$1,500 per year. I 12 ' Project Number: 800-2014-08 JL Key: 1887 Object: Carnelian Street at Banyan Street-Traffic Signal Installation ' Project Location: J L -- I< IW /i' S-) :er�_: buS i� Carnelian Street at Banyan Street , =Tn-u-n-�9FF-T Y u_:..s•. ria^ —j—uK:CL.aryr..L i I PROJE��LO�A�ION 1 v :4JE f) ' I I< I IG `y1:.4F1.t5ti4FIt�k1_ Est.Construction Start/End: 9/2015-11/2015 — la--'� s-- —` - I _ WKr, .i�f 'J' [�- 1 i� � _ J t _Project Status: —LL I rr _1c_ J J - I3 .¢ ` A"N C�1,Y 4V 'F IdAI).nll 4t.,J, �2�]J<•� I Oi Construction l- 7 lu c I^ 1Lia �� n ALTA LOMA I l� Iw a JUNI 6 OR HIGH _ �� — - Department: � Engineering ( a -JwJ` 9w �� ;.c 1 �^-�Il i �� �1¢ nla ;' •� l i� (= �e l� I 19 Project Manager: Is—I" I I�� --Z r^Nr rj �'—r, n � (•r W Jason Welday ! I �;,,,, r: �:, r, n 4 ' Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,installation of traffic signals and related equipment at Carnelian Street and Banyan Street. ' Justification: The installation of traffic signals will improve traffic safety and reduce traffic congestion. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019 20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 SO Design/Plan Review $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 Construction $0 5250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $5,000 5o $0 5o $0 $5,000 Contingency $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 ' Total Costs: $20,000 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Project Funding: PundingSource Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Transportation(124) $20,000 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Total Costs: $20,000 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance.The estimated cost of electricity and ' maintenance for a traffic signal is$2,500 per year. I 13 Project Number: 800-2015-16 JL Key: 1900 Object: Freeway and Arterial Signal Synchronization - Phase I Project Location: Various intersections where City --------- Streets intersect SR-210 and 1-15 J 7 hS �-4 Est.Construction Start/End: 7 1/2016-6/2016 .;�VFRQJECT LOCAT ................ --BASE LINIE� 7 Project Status: Construction —e', Z%:- 4– z� Department: Engineering F00TH1LCftVD t L4 Project Manager: Jason Welday Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,installation of traffic signal communication systems on City local arterials and State Route and interstate on-ramps and off-ramps and updated coordination timing along the local arterials Justification: The project will provide communication and coordination to enable monitoring,re-timing and coordination of the City's traffic signals with the State Route and Interstate for improved traffic flow and safety. These improvements equate to reduced fuel consumption and vehicle emissions. Project Cost Estimate($): Expencliture/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $36,000 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $36,000 Right-of-Way $0 $o $0 so $0 so $o Construction $0 $290,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $290,000 Inspection&Administration So so So $o so so so Contingency $0 $27,810 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,810 Total Costs: $36,000 5317,810 $0 $0 $0 $0 5353,810 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL AB 2766 Air Quality Imprvmnt Fund(105) $12,000 $112,810 $0 $0 $0 $0 $124,810 Transportation(124) $24,000 $205,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $229,000 Total Costs: $36,000 $317,810 $0 $0 $0 $0 $353,810 Impact on Operations: Communication and coordination with the State Route and Interstate with City Streets will improve maintenance staff efficiencies and reduce related costs. These systems will also provide substantial improvements in system-wide signal timing and coordination,improving operational efficiencies,while also resulting in fewer citizen complaints. 14 Project Number: 800-2012-17 JL Key: 1831 Object: Intelligent Transportation System Upgrade-Citywide Project Location: City-Wide RD Est.Construction Start/End: 12/2014—6/2016 I-1c IL Project Status: Design Department: Vwd.?rz Engineering BbVD Project Manager: Jason Welday Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,research,field investigation,analysis,inventory and mappting to prepare an ITS Master Plan for the City. Justification: The Master Plan will provide the framework for future design and implementation decisions to improve monitoring,retiming and coordination of the City's traffic signal system. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Consultant Services $15,000 $300,000 $0 $o $0 so $315,000 Staff Training $595 $0 $0 $0 $o so $595 Design/Equipment Specifications $0 $0 So $0 so so $0 Procurement/Construction $351,056 so $500,000 5500,000 $500,000 $5,533,349 $7,384,405 System Testing and Integration $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0. Contingency $0 $0 so so so so so Total Costs: 5366,651 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $5,5.33,349 $7,700,000 Project Funding: Eqad!nSource� Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Transportation(124) 5366,651 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $5,533,349 $7,700,000 Total Costs: $366,651 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $5,533,349 $7,700,000 Impact on Operations: Development of the City's ITS will improve maintenance,staff efficiencies and reduce related costs. These system upgrades will also provide substantial improvements in system-wide signal timing and coordination, improving operational efficiencies,while also resulting in fewer citizen complaints. 15 Project Number: 800-2014-06 JL Key: 1875 Object; Milliken Avenue Upgrade Left Turn Phases Location: Project ' Milliken Avenue at Mountain View VINTAGE OR Drive, Terra Vista Parkway, and Vintage Drive :.=_.I - Est.Construction Start/End: r— �� 12/2015-2/2016 �t iQ ;� �i� 71` —,^ I It} PROJECT j LOCATION Project Status: Construction GAN10 PARK Department: TERRA vlsrA ELEMENTARY Engineering _ _ lam►P / -�� � •._•'+I I V�.� (11 II�� MOUNTAIN VIE 7. Project Manager: ole r Jason Welday Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,removing protected-permissive left turn phasing and replacing with protected left turn phasing for the traffic signals on Milliken Avenue. Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by providing an exclusive phase for left turn vehicle movements. In addition, pedestrian crossings will occur separate from left turn movements, which previously occurred simultaneously with protected-permissive traffic signal equipment. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $25,000 $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 $25,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 5o $0 $o $0 50 Construction s0 $86,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $86,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $5,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $5,000 Contingency $9,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $9,000 Total Costs: $25,000 $100,000 $0 s0 $0 $0 $125,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Transportation(124) $25,000 $100,000 $0 $0 .$0 $0 $125,000 Total Costs: $25,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 Impact on Operations: After installation and configuration of the protected left turn traffic signal equipment, no additional impacts on ' operations will be present. 16 9F .� 1 - F u t u r e & U n f u n d e d Projects included in this section are those that have been identified as being a priority project, but lack dedicated funding for the upcoming fiscal year. Projects designated as 'Unfunded' couldbe waiting on grant approval, or perhaps until new special fund monies become available. Projects showing dedi- cated funding sources, but which are slated to occur in future fiscal years have mostly likely been delayed due to issues with the future funding of operating expenses. We have included this section to illustrate those priority projects that did not make it into the FY 2015/16 budget for ei- ther of these reasons. Staff is actively pursuing grant or other fundraising opportunities for several of the projects in this section. Project List& Future Expenditures Project List & Future Expenditures I. 6th St east of Haven—Line extension $760,000 21. Rochester from Foothill Blvd to Base $590,000 Line Rd—Pavement Rehab 2. Archibald Ave,Church to Palo Alto, $1,215,000 Storm Drain 22.Rte 66 Trailhead-Drainage Improve- $30,000 ment 3. Archibald Ave,from N/O Norbrook $103,000 to Carrari St 23.Safety Lighting—Upgrades at Various $150,000 Intersections 4. Arrow Rte Utility Underground $719,360 24.Terra Vista Parkway @Spruce—Safe- $130,000 S. Bus Stops Pads at Various Locations $95,000 ty Lighting Installation 6. Etiwanda Ave—Grade Separation @ $40,000,000 25.Upper Cucamonga SD Phase 111 $3,900,000 Metrolink Tracks 26.Vittoria Arbors Park—Playground $56,730 7. Etiwanda Ave Electric Line Exten- $602,500 Surface Maintenance sion,Arrow to Foothill Total $75,202,590 8. Etiwanda Creek Park—Phase II $5,580,000 9. Fire District-Operation/Dispatch Bldg $11,000,000 Potential Future Sources of Funding 10. Foothill Blvd from Grove-San $10 000 $4,630,000 $206 730 Bernardino Rd—Widen Median $136,0 0 5_,793,000 $120,000 11. Haven Ave from Wilson-Vivienda- $126,000 $1,362,500 Community Trail $100,000 $580,000 12. Hermosa Ave from Banyan to $260,000 $5.580,000 Wilson-Pavement Rehab $590,000 13.Hermosa Ave from Alta Loma Basin $2,245,000 $719,360 to Wilson—Storm Drain $839,0 0 14.Lemon Ave from Archibald to $560,000 $1 I, 00,000 Haven—Pavement Rehab ■Unknown ■ Fire Capital Projects 15.Lemon Ave from Haven to 1300' $1,700,000 west—Storm Drain ■ Gas Tax ■ Underground Utilities 16.LMD2—Paseo Lighting Repair/Replace $150,000 ❑Measure I ® Citywide Infrastructure 17.Miller Ave at East Ave-New Traffiic $300,000 Signal Installation ❑ Beautification ■ Park Development 18.Pacific Electric Trail @ Pepper— $90,000 Drainage Improvement General Drainage ■ Municipal Utility 19.Pacific Electric Trail Enhancements— $110,000 West-East City Limits Ped Grant Art cle 3 ■ PD 65 Redemption 20. Red Hill Prk-Pedestrian Paseo $100,000 ❑ LMD 2 ■ Transportation J Project Number: JL Key: ' Object: 6th Street- Line Extension Project Location: U U -9_Cft=S`T� RCMU Electric Line Extension-6th ME Street east of Haven W PROJECT LOCATION a � t Q w. d ,> w TTM=ST=*=,— L � I Est.Construction Start/End: tit j � bTM:S7= 7 Project Status: Design/Construction J Department: Engineering l Project Manager: _ — — _ _ F1 ....... 4T .5 _ _ Fred Lyn 1 Description: Distribution Line Extension on 6th Street east of Haven Avenue to provide RCMU electricity. Justification: Line extension is needed to extend RCMU power service East of Haven Avenue on 6th Street. Once lines are extended east,RCMU will also have accessibility to run lines up Milliken Avenue to interconnect with the Metrolink Station and close off the loop to the existing Jersey Fire Station-Phase 2. The City paid SCE exit fees for the right to service any load associated with a newly constructed facility that has never been interconnected with Edison;this falls under that category. Project Cost Estimate($): ' Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 So $0 So $0 $0 Design/Plan Review 50 50 510,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5o So Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $750,000 $0 5750,000 ' Inspection&Administration SO 50 5o 5o $0 So SO Contingency $0 $0 50 50 So $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $0 $10,000 50 $750,000 $0 $760,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Municipal Utility(Fund 705) $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $750,000 $0 $760,000 Total Costs: 50 SO' $10,000 $0 $750,000 $0 $760,000 Impact on Operations: The increased electricity load will provide additional revenue to RCMU. I I J1 1 Project Number: 800-2012-14 1L Key: 1805 Object: Archibald Avenue from Church Street to Palo Alto Street-Storm Drain Project Location: <•. `� RIA��NCLUIS Archibald Avenue from Church �� Street to Palo Alto Street � urn�r F f nnc-:Jx yr i -'.� �.•J� PROJECT LOCATION r - Est.Construction Start/End: I — 1 �' CI.FNW VVU STi / ! I I To be determined ; -- s —, — I wl i I •1 Project Status: a J w w Design/Construction <' a'• m ( YEW 9T 1'lW Department: 1� i Engineering —� GHURGN ST a D TANGS .. V Project Manager: ' ��� `'""' a --•�m 1 a• �. �; tea= Ji Romeo David UN GT s. J ' Description: Construct a Master Planned Storm Drain,install catch basins,manholes,and laterals. 1 Justification: This project will improve drainage within the area. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 201516 201617 201718 201819 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $35,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Inspection&Administration $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $80,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $1,215,000 $1,215,000 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Unfunded $0 So $0 $0 $0 $1,215,000 $1,215,000 ITotal Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,215,000 $1,215,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance,potholes,sand bags for storm water protection and storm water cleanup,thus freeing up Imaintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. I J2 Project Number: 800-2013-11 JL Key: 1830 Object: Archibald Avenue from North of Norbrook to Carrari Street-Community Trail West Side Project Location: 1 t West side of Archibald Avenue IM /� �nLle1(?Nn?i IN ER !CCR(It ,C. from north of Norbrook to Carrari Q r Street J I P 2� �. �FJItiUti�f,FARG1-F; J L I_fflC.IS. Est.Construction Start/End: PROJECT LOCATION ' f a : (i i4e+ilfu(v+Ar_s.l� To be determined sHFltwooUilt I I I ;(( 11 i C ('STANF-GRU!OR Project Status: - Design IAIYLER]nR S� Nfjkb i9f Sl(- 17 i BRA�.f:ll FY/ Department: 4.;� 1 _ �I l l I t�14Z:1.fp � ( ttttyyyy Engineering j Et:Q A.(L-LR a a \ S�g Y�11L L`ilL7t 12U� Project Manager: —NAS' ' —� ;w LU w I` Romeo David t Description: Construction of an equestrian trail on the west side of Archibald Avenue. Project includes installation of two rail PVC fence, decompose granite and mow curbs. ' Justification: This project will connect to the existing community trail at the west side of Achibald Avenue and is part of the trail master plan.It will also improve the appearance of the west side of Archibald Avenue. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5o $0 Design/Plan Review $10500 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $10,500 Right-of-Way $0 $o $0 50 $0 5o $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $88,200 $88,200 Inspection&Administration 50 $0 $0 $0 so $5,000 $5,000 Contingency $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $9,800 $9,800 ' Total Costs: $10,500 $0 $0 50 50 $103,000 .$113,500 Project Funding: 1 Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Beautification Fund(110) $10,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,500 IUnknown $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $103,000 $103,000 Total Costs: $10,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $103,000 $113,500 Impact on Operations: This project will add an additional quarter mile to the City's trail system, which will require trash removal,weed abatement, and routine maintenance. However, it will also remove 1,000 linear feet of City maintained public landscape,saving the City approximately$1,100 year. Staff is currently seeking grant funds for construction. I I J3 Project Number: 800-2010-12 JL Key: 1777 Object: Arrow Route Utility Underground-Bear Gulch to West of Archibald Avenue Project Location: r Arrow Route from Bear Gulch tooorrnLL uLvo�— west of Archibald Avenue TIMBERLINE LN I I� PROJECT LOCATION J L< riAMPIS� RE-ST CONIFER L. 1 t �Q ILLI qA .� I I :.H`EL:SE�A�CT ;.1]I �,i i_ (� �i�' 'w � 11 Est.Construction Start/End: 06/2018-01/2019 i 1'.6<--'------2_-� Project Status: BEAR GULCH y w I !I,fa.CA;. R'tiT_' PLACER-S.T Design ELEMENTARY Pa•-ER 5T Z' a �C I I a la W IJP ? I � NO KV : rsr l (,rcui n=s.T 'Kf3N7)L71 - IQ LL � Department: �7Ia iQI—e j l > FRIANf 5T Engineering BEAR GULCH J­-ALLE UJ Project Manager: Walt Stickney Description: This project will underground a stretch of existing overhead utilities along Arrow Route from Bear Gulch to west of Archibald Avenue. Justification: The removal of the overhead utilities,by placing them underground,improves the aesthetic appearance of the area. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL IEnvironmental/NPDES 50 50 50 $0 50 SO 50 Design/Plan Review 50 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $o $15,000 Right-of-Way $o $0 $0 5o $o $0 $0 Construction 50 $0 50 $626,690 SO $0 $626,690 Inspection&Administration $0 5o 50 $15,000 50 $0 $15,000 I Contingency $0 $0 50 $62,670 $0 SO $62,670 Total Costs: $0 $0 50 5719,360 $0 $0 $719,360 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL IUnderground Utilities(129) $0 $0 $0 $719,360 50 $0 $719,360 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $719,360 $0 50 $719,360 Impact on Operations: None I J4 Project Number: 800-2014-07 JL Key: 1823 Object: Bus Stop Pads at Various Locations Project Location: O IKI�S'�UNAVE = ''`"•�'y' WIL-SON•AVE--WIL-i'-A.XYE Various locations throughout the -� a .,. ! l ' tY I� j' City including stops on Arrow -"�-� �>a�= zQ ^> Ar�YAN?� - i Route, Hellman Avenue, 9th ' r ly�rye d*-� Ll�,t• TOS^ �r Jr s Street, Haven Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, and 7TH s-; " �+ h " '�+= ��c°Y �c !!r Day Creek II'li-' (yam F••.. �F' P_ Boulevard � +-Ill•, -� o^✓ t ii. � ' .P,A'GIFJC EL'F•CTRIG1jkA1L {+A(,' 1¢:ELE4TRIC TRAIL v',.I l i��r •�^i y '. 7 `�J-U111 i.+.' - .II .,(_-�; Est.Construction Start/End: uasEK.INF1an- 09/2016 11/2016 UR-H-ST ,!'•.t 77�LL ^ a. 4. _ MIL-4L-E AV oi Project Status: Design/Construction Department: a�atri si .j•; J I'.�-� ,EkSEY-Bt� Engineering 4— a— I f-7 H-5'r �i �y, —_•- 1 F 6TFhS-T AS�N u Project Manager: I'iru j� � c Curt Billings Description: Constructs 17 bus pads at various locations throughout the City. Justification: Provides ADA improvements to existing public transportation stops that are currently used by over 300 riders each day.The improvements may increase ADA ridership,resulting in less vehicle trips and reduced CO2 emissions. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016117 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $93,240 $0 $86,000 $0 $0 $0 $179,240 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $9,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,000 Total Costs: $93,240 $0 $95,000 $0 $0 s0 '$188,240 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 201617 201718 201819 TBD TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $18,640 $0 $19,000 $0 $0 $0 $37,640 IPed Grant/Art3 Fund(214) $74,600 $0 $76,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,600 Total Costs: $93,240 $o $95,000 $0 $0 $0 $188,240 Impact on Operations: None J5 Project Number: 800-2015-25 1L Key: 1922 Object: Etiwanda Avenue-Grade Separation at Metrolink Tracks Project Location: _ %� '� = Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route ' u w i a � LU4x, ca Y / PROJECT LOCATION `S d '� ` l^!111.7-TFAt7tAVtr t --.- Est.Construction Start/End: t To be determined ATSF RAILRDAC �. i o Project Status: Design L Department: Engineering Project Manager: a c Curt Billings Description: Prepare preliminary design drawings for a future grade separation on Etiwanda Avenue at the Metrolink Railroad Crossing south of Whitram Avenue. Justification: This project will improve safety and traffic circulation on Etiwanda Avenue. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $337,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,337,000 Right-of-Way $1,335,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $4,835,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,000,000 $32,000,000 Inspection&Administration $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000, tContingency $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Total Costs: $1,672,000 50 50 $0 $0 $40,000,000 $41,672,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Transportation Fund(124) $337,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $5,337,000 Infrastructure Fund(198) $1,335,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,335,000 Unknown $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000,000 $35,000,000 ITotal Costs: $1,672,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000,000 $41,672,000 Impact on Operations: Added maintenance costs for a new bridge will be determined during design phase. I J6 Project Number: JL Key: 1885 Object: Etiwanda Avenue- Line Extension Project Location: Etiwanda Avenue Electric Line _ _—� /0 Extension - from Arrow Route to / „ FCOrHILL BLVD 07 Foothill Boulevard x YINF.5T Est.Construction Start/End: "' PROJECT LOCATION Project Status: Design .J la _ a _ Department: i Engineering 3 ARROW RTF Project Manager: Fred Lyn Description: Distribution Line Extension east of the 1-15 freeway to service vacant parcels on the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue with RCMU electricity. Justification: Line extension is needed to extend power service on Etiwanda Avenue to service vacant parcels on the corner Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The City paid SCE exit fees for the right to service any load associated with a newly constructed facility or undeveloped parcels that has never been interconnected with Edison;this falls under that category. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDE5 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500 $2,500 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $602,500 $602,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Municipal Utility(Fund 705) 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 $602,500 $602,500 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $602,500 $602,500 Impact on Operations: The increased electricity load will provide additional revenue to RCMU. J7 Project Number: X Key: 1664 Object: Etiwanda Creek Park- Phase 11 Project Location: 5939 East Avenue A NS ETIWANDA COLONY ELEMENTARY D LY SUMMITI TEMA 14TE JUNIOR Hil Est.Construction Start/End: 1-Z IV To be determined SU A, T N'0 TE I{ - R"'4r Gi 5 Project Status: Design I.ASWA ST If.-W DR PROJECT LOCATION Department: Community Services/Parks Project Manager: Nettie Nielsen Description: This project involves the initial design of park expansion which may include additional athletic/recreation multi-use fields,tennis courts,a 10,000-15,000 square foot community building,storage/maintenance facility and additional parking. Justification: The City Council identified this project as a goal for FY2007-08. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $159,230 $0 $500,000 $0 $o $0 $659,230 Right-of-Way $o $0 $o $0 $0 $o $o Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $5,580,000 $5,580,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $o $0 $o $o $0 $0 Contingency $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $o Total Costs: $159,230 $0 $500,000 $o $o $5,580,000 $6,239,230 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Park Development(120) $159,230 $0 $500,000 $0 $o $5,580,000 $6,239,230 Total Costs: $159,230 $0 $500,000 $o $0 $5,580,000 $6,239,230 Impact on Operations: Completion of this project will add a new facility to the City's inventory which will require operational extenclitures for maintenance,staffing,overhead and utilities. Initial estimates place the cost of maintaining two addional fields at$300,000-$450,000 per year. J8 Project Number: JL Key: 1392 Object: Fire District-Operations/Dispatch Building Project Location: TA'FF0RaS:" Northwest corner of Civic Center Drive and Utica Avenue L 1:00'1111 L'L.�1CV. W :• N a-4 t O t CITY MALL RC POLI..r`\ ��_.. / ry11-L-ENNIU E;ST�&TION –=CCIvIC-,F :OR Est.Construction Start/End: "t+c=R-ST � ,ryA ' Unknown � I 'j" Y —;� I a u, y O . q I' ��f ¢=G51R.QVV RTE—� Project Status: �vJ L'. W On Hold Y iLL' C~LL _7 C 33 o — LG;.I:IS.L Department: :ucamoNCAQ li � •;; ' JJJ I `^�J� .IEIRSEIr Fire Protection District IDLE "111 s.r W !' BLVD �7ATH:SI�a j ROJECT LOCATION HLI1I BO / Project Manager: TM S. Chief Mike Costello/Pamela Pane 77-7 y 9 f Description: This project will construct a building to house Fire District Headquarters personnel and a possible dispatch center. 1 Justification: Fire District Administration personnel have outgrown the current area in the Civic Center building. A new facility was recommended in the 2005 Strategic Plan to consolidate Fire Administration functions. There may be a future need to add a dispatch center. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Construction $0 $0 $o $o $o $10,000,000 $10,000,000 Inspection&Administration $o $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $o ' Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 $11,000,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018119 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital Projects(288) $0 SO SO $0 $o $11,000,000 $11,000,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 $11,000,000 Impact on Operations: Fire District operations and maintenance costs will increasae with increased square footage, but will be unknown until final design is complete. I I 19 1 Project Number: JL Key: 1189 1 Object: Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road -Widening with Median Island including Landscaped Median to Vineyard Avenue 1 Project Location: �l \\\JI Jy r.F.O"R10.DR�/ �:p¢� i "Ta'�+ecRH Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road, including landscaped median to PROJECT"LOCATION Vineyard Avenue ;: ¢ ----~'" a -��:�'t�ee• ro 41- Est.Construction Start End. vHJeHnclenlr. R •^----ro_ TBD I I tµa•a / y I I ,, lel} •✓ti�4� �, j IYI:NELIYI:7R Project Status: �•% s II Design KNOLLWUOO CP. 1 �/ t:4JKIEL O!It4PPLEWOOD DR Department: Q 9 IYINlCCEngineering Project Manager: e7AR_�LLV. r LI �r' i��JrL. AKFOWATE Curt — Billings 1 Description: This project is the last phase of the multi phased Foothill Boulevard street and bridge improvements and includes right-of-way acquisition,utility relocation,street widening,storm drain and landscape improvements. Justification: This project will provide increased traffic and pedestrian circulation including safety and visual enhancements. The project is identified in the City's General Plan and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. ' Project Cost Estimate($): ' Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 201617 201718 201819 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 so Design/Plan Review $3,096,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $3,126,000 ' Right-of-Way $713,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $141,000 $854,000 Construction $9,884,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 54,059,000 $13,943,000 ' Inspection&Administration $613,000 50 50 $0 50 50 $613,000 Contingency 51,289,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $1,689,000 Total Costs: 515,595,000 $0 $0 s0 $0 $4,630,000 $20,225,000 ' Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL IRDA-2001 TAB(650) $3,504,000 $0 50 50 $0 $0 $3,504,000 RDA-2004 TAB(660) $11,684,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,684,000 Transportation Fund(124) $407,000 $0 $0 50 $0 5o $407,000 Unknown $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $4,630,000 $4,630,000 Total Costs: $15,595,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,630,000 $20,225,000 IImpact on Operations: This project adds one mile of additional landscape maintenance costs along Foothill Boulevard,as well as some additional street lights into SLD 1. I 110 Project Number: 800-2013-15 JL Key: 1829 ' Object: Haven Avenue from Wilson Avenue to Vivienda Street;-Community Trail on the west side Project Location: West side of Haven Avenue From //��� \/ Wilson Avenue to Vivienda Street I'z _ i- _�f yNf;DY_CNE-C T�• _VISNA.-i,ELL•E.$. I M LL' L;µ10"F": V.IVIENGA K. � Est.Construction Start/End:tartEnd: 02/2016-03/20163------- Project Status: 4 C0-FLDesign/Construction v° C�—I'°Qr> L SNs j� � w' I1 < '�iiFDi!y�✓' >: Department: Department: Engineering g gPROJECT LOCATION C III Project Manager: r+EFMosa 11 !�I`I C Romeo David Description: Construction of an equestrian trail on the west side of Haven Avenue. Project includes the installation of a two rail PVC fence, decomposed granite,and mow curbs. Justification: This project will connect to the existing community trail at the west side of Haven Avenue and is part of the trail master plan.It will also improve the appearance of the west side of Haven Avenue. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 $0 50 So 50 $0 Design/Plan Review SO 50 SO $0 50 $0 $0 Right-of-way $2,500 So So $0 $0 $0 $2,500 ' Construction $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $111,500 $111,500 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 50 5o $0 $3,500 $3,500 Contingency $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $11,000 511,000 Total Costs: 52,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $126,000 $128,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Beautification Fund(110) S2,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $126,000 $128,500 Total Costs: $2,500 50 50 $0 $0 $126,000 $128,500 Impact on Operations: This project will add an additional quarter mile to the City's trail inventory, requiring trash removal, weed abatement,and routine maintenance. J11 Project Number: 800-2012-29 JL Key: 1815 t Object: Hermosa Avenue from Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: �a H W�� Hermosa Avenue from ?an NrcH Banyan P iJ . cr ��— Street to Wilson Avenue I� tF. ' C�1 WILSON AV NER MOSA 2 - EMENTARY71 ii Y:iITIIfA.C'.�'�� / r.f:TT(7M1WC:r:[IYlAY Sv' 7I fz t Est.Construction Start/End: ',,� WI .s• 09/2017-10/2017f, a .1 IK..nHWUfilrf:T� Project Status: Design Department: J a Y.=PROJECT LOCATION Engineering _� �s Project Manager: Curt Billings Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt pavement overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valve and manhole cover adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $10,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $o $o $230,000 SO $0 $o $230,000 Inspection&Administration SO SO $10,000 $o $0 $0 $10,000 Contingency $0 $0 $20,000 s0 $0 SO $20,000 ' Total Costs: $10,000 $o $260,000 50 $0 $0 $270,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360(174) $10,000 $o $260,000 $0 s0 $0 $270,000 ITotal Costs: $10,000 $0 $260,000 $0 $0 $0 $270,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to Iother needed areas. I J12 ' Project Number: 800-2012-28 JL Key: 1810 ' Object: Hermosa Avenue from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson Avenue-Storm Drain Improvements t Project Location: Iw- _':1l Hermosa Avenue from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson AvenueWILSON AVE � v 1 N a HERMOSA ii c L.EPA ENTARY _= 2 13. V C:C TT0f:1VC:0❑WAY Est.Construction Start/End: J- �n -rcr.I-L ER I 4/2016-9/2016 � a' �I N;4N_[ljJC,rTA=CER QI KFFLN'iVV- m 1 L f i wn r.eajr<w:v.< Project Status: �� )sYCT a F, Design WL n�ITll6iuc.�tiR� jV . ..I Department: z ALTA LOMA BASIN ALTA LOMA BASIN Engineering II S; PROJECT LOCATION � tIANyON 57--- Project Manager: 1 +� r l� I I��)?7 1 I I I rr Curt Billings Description: Construct a master planned storm drain, install mainline, catch basins and manholes. The entire street from the Alta Basin to Wilson Avenue will be resurfaced upon completion(see Hermosa rehabilitation project JL 1815). Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life,use,and rideability.Also,during rain events it will provide improved pedestrian access to the Hermosa Intermediate School at Wilson Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $1,900,000 $1,900,000 Inspection&Administration 50 SO $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $45,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5300,000 $300,000 Total Costs: $10,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $2,245,000 $2,255,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017118 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Drainage General Fund(112) $10,000 So $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Unknown $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $2,245,000 $2,245,000 Total Costs: $10,000 $0 $0 s0 $0 $2,245,000 $2,255,000 Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and a reduction of street repair maintenace costs for pothole and crack repairs,thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas. J1 3 Project Number: 800-2012-24 1L Key: 1793 Object: Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue-Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Lemon Avenue from Archibald �� 'y)SAN.ANC•REAa Dft I Avenue to Haven Avenue I i' >l Sl '•I; �� �•rR E.� I �� �`�� ja �' PROJECT LOCATION W '— U] Est.Construction Start/End: I�; iANf 1N?jf r 08/2018-10/2018 !< ( :ua ,r:, + �> _ LL Ilf i f J IA Cl.f1Fl-OR i.y u Project Status: Design � Ig r L '6 (lt:E-G ( , J Department: �q�rciu��t= 1 Engineering a A'DAR a VINEYARD V,P' o .1I/NIOR NIf.M f i p P� C V Project Manager: ,J ""•;',"' IN Curt Billings Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt pavement overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valve and manhole cover adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 50 Design/Plan Review 510,000 50 $0 50 $0 50 $10,000 Right-of-Way $o $0 So $0 $0 $0 5o Construction $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 50 $500,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $10,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 550,000 Total Costs: 510,000 $0 $0 5560,000 $0 $0 $570,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Prop 42 Fund(190) $10,000 50 $0 50 50 $0 510,000 Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) 5o $0 $0 5560,000 50 $0 $560,000 Total Costs: $10,000 5o $0 $560,000 $0 5o 5570,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. J14 Project Number: 800-2011-08 1L Key: 1791 Object: Lemon Avenue from Haven Avenue to 1,300 feet west-Storm Drain Improvements ' Project Location: W Lemon Avenue from Haven L a'—_ liANY N —c.� Avenue to 1300 feet west. y J f 4 5 I� ;Q �> Z W Z Is LL a a z ¢ I' Est.Construction Start/End: J� _�'� L t�W—�Y 4/2018-9/2018 I f - L. :.i�� �AIY�:F. (Q I 2I �_ Project Status: vrxt ti7A JV Lim 15.TQE,pR� i a,RISTAL,']FR?_Q__ Design PROJECT-LOCATION Corce.;sr%� lLL < VINEYARD `^F y JUNIOR HIGH ' Department: ca Engineering ri1.Plan•r+VF 1 Project Manager: F;NCH AWE �a } o Curt Billings 4 I r+ it _h_�_-6Ykcki- V,F ' Description: Construct a master planned storm drain,install mainline,catch basins and manholes.The entire street from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue will be resurfaced upon completion(see Lemon rehabilitation project JL 1793). ' Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life,use,and rideability.Also,during rain events it will provide improved pedestrian access. Project Cost Estimate(S): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Design/Plan Review $2,000 $o 5o So $0 $0 $2,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,520,000 $1,520,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 Contingency $0 $0 50 $0 50 $170,000 $170,000 ' Total Costs: $2,000 $0 $0 SO $0 $1,700,000 $1,702,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Drainage General Fund(112) S2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 So $2,000 ' Unknown $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $1,700,000 $1,700,000 Total Costs: 52,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,700,000 $1,702,000 I Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and a reduction of street repair maintenace casts for pothole and crack repairs,thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas. I 1 15 ' Project Number: 1L Key: 1716 ' Object: Paseo Liebling-Repair 8t Replace Project Location: ' LLIVIDLIVID2(Victoria)Area l E g� —11-2 r—' -AVF K N RIC ' In 1 V1Cr• IARR1CLNg� 7 G A a FIR l R1 v kAGfF+C-6�F'TRl dRA1RK 1 ACIFIG ESL.Construction Start/End: RRANCHO UCAMON GA CENT A P.. BaSE;I�.NE:RD, q ! rTBD . I'. COV.UfiE ANYOWPAR� (( °•: i R RS�RAR d/. ' Project Status: Vii'\ .=. � �!�j �1 �� �.I�M25UhIfA'Itd•.F P •� {Ctrl Construction Rte. -E AVENUE.PAR LVE T�.G 1;!III.WAY:R9RK v„�— I� � � ��� �7'�1.71LI LIR EN�PARK MIFF- ;' 6R Department: Rtktpftnfl `K—�� Public Works Services —1 s- PItOJECT�6.0 T/� 10 Z a Project Manager: t �. pNCM OCUCAIAO GAADUL S OR TS•GUM EX y Dean Rodia ;� C;FVFL"=CENiEFK,DRp �i p�I-' ev H ' Description: This project will repair/replace/upgrade paseo lighting within LMD 2. The project will be sites VW2,VW6 and VW7. ' Justification: The decline of Paseo lighting is a hazard to public safety. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $o SO $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 5o $0 $135,000 $135,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $15,000 ' Total Costs: $0 So $0 $o $o $150,000 $1.50,000 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL LIVID 2 Victoria(131) $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $150,000 $150,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 Impact on Operations: When completed,this project will have a positive impact upon ongoing operations by lessening the failure rate of light poles thereby increasing the maintenance intervals and allowing staff time to be utilized elsewhere.The use of I LEDs will cut current electric consumption by half. I J16 Project Number: 800-2014-11 A Key: 1888 Object: Miller Avenue at East Avenue-Traffic Signal Installation Project Location: evr.nrnar t F i Jlo Miller Avenue at East AvenueU a RIVER-OAK-UK-0 i . :R'R' 'E_U ? 'Z' fI ' a FIRES T LINE DR C E'vt�Y W d l 7 1 - / L� G R=_VAL-1 PALMIF2A UR , ' Est.Construction Start/End: z'� r. �a'i MIL.LE.l3 AVEC To be determined PERDEW ' Project Status: ELEMENTARY 5Y`v�x �i lY�— ' ! Design I WI.% C VFrt% NE.T.n.OR a ,RTFZCT j U) Department: Engineering r , (J P C%A 6 ;HLRV1L.ST GARCIA.DR ' Project Manager: PROJECT LOCATION W Jason Welday / Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,installation of traffic signals and related equipment at Miller Avenue and East Avenue. Justification: The installation of traffic signals will improve traffic safety and reduce traffic congestion. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 $0 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 So $0 $0 SO $12,500 $12,500 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,500 $12,500 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 ' Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Transportation(124) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 ' Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $300,000 $300,000 Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance.The estimated cost of electricity and ' maintenance for a traffic signal is$2,500 per year. I J17 Project Number: 800-2015-12 JL Key: 1901 Object: Pacific Electric Trail at Pepper Street-Drainage Improvement Project Location: I -I---------- BASE LINT Pacific Electric Trail west of Hellman Avenue PROJECT LOCATION` ;r ! lyi I ''',////// W ............ I A Est.Construction Start/End: ............. 09/2016-10/2016 V Project Status: Construction El Department: Z Engineering Irc A , Project Manager: c=6 W Stickney Description: Drainage improvements along the Pacific Electric Trail west of Hellman Avenue. Justification: Drainage from the Pacific Electric Trail must be diverted into an existing storm drain to avoid inundating adjacent properties. Project Cost Estimate Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o $0 $0 $o so $o $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $o so $80,000 $0 $0 $o $80,000 Inspection&Administration so $0 $2,000 $0 $0 so $2,000 Contingency $0 $0 $8,000 so $o $o $8,000 Total Costs: $o $0 $90,000 $0 $0 so $90,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL General Drainage(112) $o $o $90,000 $0 $o $0 $90,000 Total Costs: $0 $o $90,000 $0 $o $o $90,000 Impact on Operations: Diversion of drainage will eliminate the need for City staff to provide sandbags and cleanup. 1 18 ' Job Number: JL Key: 1775 Object: Pacific Electric Trail Enhancements-West to East City Limits Project Location: L i nalSE L`SID-1— i ' +I-llt)TRD� ! y Pacific Electric Trail from West �N• �71.—✓ � �9�1 i t -�` :. J Lr LW �J C� WIL-SkSN•AV£ WILSON-AVE--W City Limits to East City Limits =_�I N�+-�L� ~" , El I� z m 4�J '_.. c - ='t: Q ANYAN-ST FEZ '• Qtr .��glG'NL'IiND AV�w Est.Construction Start/End: To be determined �UAStrIfN jRW v r �i `h-' p a; - .r='D •F -�� .tt,111Rr;t1;$T I,":x,-^T :^'`w z-; :.�:. • t Project Status: Design �,�„ .:,.i'LS= •-i __.-.-; '3� ��-, � I F.06Tt11Li 6CV Department: s e ARR-W-RTET :^ r PO�iE��LQ.�►'A-TIQN Engineering � I Ti-s7 > !ERSEV-DL•Vp �narnse y '� , Project Manager: , T F yin-54 Walt Stickney Description: This project includes the addition of various amenities along the trail. These amenities consist of replacing plaques and installing other trail improvements such as truncated domes at wheel chair ramps. Justification: The trail from the west to east end was constructed in different phases,at different times,and by different contractors. Issues have come up during the course of the last couple years by users of the trail that has prompted the need for this enhancement. Project Cost Estimate($�: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 201516 201617 201718 201819 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 5o $0 $0 $o 5o $0 $0 Design/Plan Review so $0 so 5o 50 $0 SO Right-of-way $0 $0 so 50 so $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 5o 50 $0 $110,000 5110,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $0 $0 50 s0 $0 50 Contingency $0 $0 So $o S0 5o $0 Total Costs: s0 $0 s0 50 50 $110,000 $110,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Beautification(110) $0 So So $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 City-wide Infrastructure Imp(198) $0 $0 $0 $0 5o $100,000 $100,000 Total Costs: $0 s0 $0 $0 5o 5110,000 $110,000 Impact on Operations: Minimal impact on operations. I I I 1 19 Project Number: JL Key: 1621 Object: Red Hill Park-Pedestrian Paseo Project Location: 7484 Vineyard Avenue r �— ��_nhsr.❑Nr;Ju�Q SPARKAT IRD-1,1111.-..M. IITY_PARK r FEE` Est.Construction Start/End: i % '�� �',' ��� To be determined �R �n��—'��� �IIJUU E UL JC Project Status: Design ' Department: LOCATION t �'��'. Engineering �4 � - ;�� FIPROJECT - /� FOOTHILL BLVD U� Project Manager: I f� �n Walt Stickney 7-7 F7 i I '� ' �� S7: n ' S' 'I IF Description: Construction of a concrete sidewalk and lights in the south west corner between Red Hill Park and Carnelian Avenue. Justification: Adds a pedestrian access to Red Hill Park from Carnelian Avenue Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 5o 50 $0 Design/Plan Review 515,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 515,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 5o $o $0 5o $o ' Construction $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 $90,000 Inspection&Administration So 5o $0 $0 5o $0 $0 Contingency $0 $o $0 5o $0 510,000 510,000 fTotal Costs: $15,000 $0 $0 So $0 $100,000 $115,000 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2015116 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL PD-85 Redemption(848) $15,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $100,000 $115,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $115,000 Impact on Operations: Minor impact. J 20 Project Number: 800-2012-26 1L Key: 1821 1 Object: Rochester Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Rochester Avenue from Foothill Boulevad to Base Line Road a )LJI�IL jQ �Il� IU JACOFCE IUr J P,0 fn C OTE 14, ON PAFfK t •s� �� •�v� ,\ — l� VIGI lV•�- MOUIJTAIN VIEW PAR!$ C Iq� I4 Est.Construction Start/End: l� '= ��i 9/2016-10/2016nOv1Glr'I� C V. ���y �� I :ERK�'11 � `u wESTRE A�VE NUE�PANW PARl�� 611L IK PARK Project Status: Design c 'RALPH M.LEM7S PARK Department V1 D r L`J``J y' �^ Engineering PROJECT LOCATION � ( � - � _F30TMIL'L:5LV. V� �J Project Manager: J ti I�a JI I r /j„ Curt Billings J + Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt pavement overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valve and manhole cover adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 201516 201617 2017/18 201819 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 50 s0 50 $0 50 Design/Plan Review $8,605 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $8,605 Right-of-Way 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $520,000 $0 $0 $0 $520,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Contingency $0 s0 $60,000 $0 50 50 560,000 Total Costs: $8,605 50 $590,000 50 $0 $0 $598,605 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 201516 201617 2017/18 201819 TBD TOTAL Measure I Fund(177) $8,605 $0 $590,000 $0 50 50 5598,605 Total Costs: $8,605 $0 $590,000 $0 $0 $0 $598,605 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. J21 tProject Number: JL Key: 1912 1 Object: Route 66 Trailhead-Drainage Project Project Location: ��F�#19 Foothill and Highridge .P_ -CENTER �1 '•i OTHILL BLVD �J tR °- // / l� IROJECT LOCATION Est.Construction Start/End: n 09/2016-10/2016 :D c\E�C� 7 v! '1—! JLi I n W Project Status: Y J I �— Design/Construction m a zLJ > (� w� k � � 1 Department: s —�ARRON(RTe Engineering/PWSD Project Manager: ' Walt Stickney/Dean Rodia Description: Installation of drainage improvements to alleviate surface erosion of the decomposed granite(DG)ramp access from the parking ' lot to the PE Trail.This is also an ADA access area. Justification: The drainage design is inadequate and a few hours of rainfall can washout this steep ramp creating a hazard. This project 1 proposes to have a concrete ribbon gutter and catch basins installed on both sides of the trail,and install curb-core drainage from the main catch basin at the bottom of the trail into the parking lot. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o $0 5o 5o 5o 5o $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 5o $o 5o $0 $o ' Construction $0 $0 $27,000 5o So $o $27,000 Inspection&Administration So $0 $0 50 So 5o $0 Contingency $0 $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 ' Total Costs: So 5o 530,000 5o $0 $0 $30,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL General Drainage(112) $0 50 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 530,000 $0 $o $0 $30,000 Impact on Operations: None. I I I J 22 Project Number: 800-2013-28 JL Key: 1842 Object: Safety Lighting- Upgrades at Various Intersections Project Location: 1..: - I'_I— ��Sr u� „ � - 1E Foothill �IL� Foothill Boulevard at the I ,p W c'.IrPrl intersections of Vineyard Avenue, Archibald Avenue, and Haven ' Avenue L'I �f Rgsrr�I�'rE:RD—I ,— U � J C LLL <)MMII _FARM` :• /.�•� C2� ^�� Lid II JIJJ r�JL1.11�.�l v=✓ Est.Construction Start/End: �p•41; syP:'` I, ( ] ;I� I r'I •,� �� ' To be determined IIR fj STR TPq�� _ _ li i I ' �`I !� Project Status: i,PROJEcT LOCATIONf_ Design - I Department: : r ' Engineering l: .� I rr .— •I I_�: .[.. i :, :_;:.....�. —I•SLI —...-. �;.I� —................. .. V 7 J_ —:1 _ . : : Cs.:1..._ Project Manager: f GEPR ' PgRKJL �r I f �- Jason Welday Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, installing additional safety lighting at existing signalized intersections. ' Justification: The project will upgrade the lighting for vehicles and pedestrians by enhancing the visibility at the intersection. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 so $0 $0 $0 $0 $o ' Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $3,000 $3,000 Right-of-Way $0 So $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Construction. $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $130,000 $130,000 Inspection&Administration so. So $0 $0 $o $4,000 $4,000 Contingency $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $13,000 $13,000 ' Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015116 201617 201718 201819 TBD TOTAL Transportation(124) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 Impact on Operations: The project will increase the cost for electrical service,and maintenance to replace lamps will occur approximately Ievery 5 years. J 23 Project Number: 800-2015-17 JL Key: 1902 Object: Terra Vista at Spruce-Safety Lighting Installation Project Location: ............ Terra Vista Parkway at Spruce Avenue J, - --------- Est.Construction Start/End: zwz� 7 TED • =:D ......------------------ Project Status: ... ....... Design/Construction Department: CT LOCATION PROJE Engineering AL="Le-sJR Project Manager: Jason Welday Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,installing safety lighting at the existing all-way stop- controlled intersection. Justification: The project will upgrade the lighting for vehicles and pedestrians by enhancing the visibility at the intersection. Project Cost Estimate Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 so $o $0 $0 so $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $o so $20,000 $20,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 so $o $0 5100,000 $100,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 Contingency so $o so so $0 $10,000 $10,000 Total Costs: so $0 so $0 50 $130,000 $130,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Transportation(124) $0 so $0 so $0 $130,000 $130,000 Total Costs: so $0 so $0 $0 $130,000 $130,000' Impact on Operations- The project will increase the cost for electrical service,and maintenance to replace lamps will occur approximately every 5 years. J 24 Project Number: JL Key: ' Object: Upper Cucamonga Storm Drain Phase III-East of Hellman Avenue to Base Line Road to Roberds, North on Amethyst Street to 19th Street,and Easterly 300 feet Project Location: East of Hellman Avenue along the north side of the Pacific Electric .� 19TH S:r— Trail, along Base Line Road toi ' Roberds Street,north in Amethyst = J � L. Street to 19th Street and easterly —" --ri��� ^Cy SJC--= HEF 300 feet. a � t U l.J'�2 1 ULI i�� Est.Construction Start/End: To be determined ;L, -PROJECT LOCA 10 T N � Project Status: UL �I :J Construction �U aSEci ,U� rL�LitiJfasa�FK } -J `I Department: II� J Engineering PEDJdILL^orvau ITY_pAPISJ,Q U�� Project Manager: t ��IJULJI Cr+uRc STw Romeo David Description: Construct a Master Plan Storm Drain,install catch basins and manholes. In addition,Amethyst Street will be widened with curb and gutter and sidewalks where necessary. All the streets within the storm drain limits will be resurfaced upon completion. Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life,use,and rideability.Also,during rain events it will provide improved pedestrian access along Amethyst Street which serves Alta Loma Elementary School. In addition,a FEMA Flood Zone Letter of Map Revision(LOMR)will be processed after completion removing the properties around the area from Zone A requiring additional flood insurance. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $o So 5o $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 Inspection&Administration 5o 50 $0 50 $0 50 50 Contingency $0 $0 So $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 Total Costs: $0 50 $0 $0 50 $3,900,000 $3,900,000 ' Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Unknown $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,900,000 $3,900,000 Total Costs: 50 $0 So $0 SO $3,900,000 $3,900,000 Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and reduction of street repair maintenace costs for pothole and crack repairs,thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas. J 25 Project Number: 1L Key: Object: 5300 Victoria Arbors Park Playground Rubberized Surface Maintenance Project Location: LIVID 2(Victoria Arbors Park) ! C� x BASE LINE RD aerira =.1 I sl11 ?:. ' Est.Construction Start/End: TBD I^ `;:' — _ ` ' ) .�o�c TcwtA�axec><trt vsrnc.;. \� `•�-- Project Design _ Department: i Public Works Services A I— i— muwCl.sT Project Manager: - Dean Rodia PROJEOT"LOCATION_- Description: Maintenance of the existing playground surface at Victoria Arbors Park with a new rubberized surface. Justification: The rubberized playground surface meets the latest ADA requirements. ' Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,060 $51,060 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SS,670 $5,670 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $56,730 $56,730 Project Funding: ' Funding Source Prior Years 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TBD TOTAL LIVID 2 Victoria(131) SO $56,730 SO - $0 $0 $56,730 $113,460 Total Costs: $0 $56,730 $0 $0 $0 $56,730 $113,460 Impact on Operations: The playground at Victoria Arbors Park will have to be closed to the general public while the new rubberized surface is being installed. J 26 General Plan Policies Fiscal Year 2015/2o16 Capital Improvement Program 1 UTI i1ON BEA" .' . FIC ATl !j Action I Z Type U > General Plan Policy m r C U •C O �= I O C •y (n ?. V CS t O O 0d U Implementation Action(s) r- 0E C � C C C N C O 7 d W C to 2 fn �' L i C L CM- Continue to provide pedestrian amenities on sidewalks on major 3.11 0 streets that are key pedestrian routes, including the provision of I I benches,shade trees,and trash cans. Identify key pedestrian travel corridors citywide, and prepare a Citywide Pedestrian Circulation Study to determine pedestrian amenity needs, capital and operating funding sources, and a phased implementation program. Develop a program for gradually installing public amenities such as streetlights, benches, trash containers, art, drinking fountains, ENG PL j A, D 5 landscaping, etc. that will enhance the pedestrian environment and C' D encourage increased use of transit. Use both the CIP,process and other funding sources, including a program whereby businesses or residents I may sponsor street furniture and/or landscaped areas, i I CM_ Continue to require that the siting and architectural design of new 312 0 development promote safety, pedestrian-friendly design, and access to transit facilities. j I I Develop standards to be applied to development proiects along transit PL corridors that require transit and pedestrian accessibility. i ENG I i 4 Establish a number of bike hubs in the City (centralized locations CM- 0 with convenient bike parking for trip destinations or transfer to 3.13 other transportation modes), at key transit nodes, and at commercial nodes. I Conduct a study to determine the best locations for bike hubs in the City, TI- and develop a plan, wayfinding program, and implementation process for A g, providing bike hubs that provide secure bicycle lockers, bike racks, and I ENG PL, RD 4C, D connections to transit at key locations in the City. CM- I 0 Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access to local and regional 3.14 transit,including facilitating connections to transit. Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PI i I 4 CM- Coordinate the provision of the non-motorized networks (bicycle 3.15 0 and pedestrian) with adjacent jurisdictions to maximize sub- regional connectivity. i Same action as identified for CM-3.7. i ENG IPL A, E, F 4 CM_ 0 Establish fixed-route local circulator bus service connecting major 3.16 activity centers. Explore development of a fixed-route local circulator bus system, station location, and funding mechanisms. ENG PL A, E, H 5 Continue to implement traffic management and traffic signal CM-4.1 0 operations measures along the arterial roadway to minimize delay and congestion for all modes, without adversely impacting transit, bicycles,and pedestrians. Appendix A:Implementation Plan P, ANCH0 CUC /-'. iJi0N' G - G = fNErAl_ P _ r, !j A-25 Action Type c > General Plan Policy y 0 I v d V I E Dl .'0 I 0 C 0 C L) Implementation Action(s) c c o a U) C I .o ao o`- V) a` cn I PL,AS, A 6 i I Same actions as identified for RC-4.1 to RC-4.5. ENG ENG, C E 3 CM, aS, PVJ, FIN G, I Encourage development of transit-oriented and infill development, 7PS-12.3O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative transportation. Same action as identified for P,C-4.41. PL ENG A 1 3 Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure,and support PS-12.4 O I public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the potential for Bus Rapid Transit(BRT). Same action as identified for RC-4.4. I PL ENG I A, 1 13 Provide green building incentives, assess green building techniques as a formal stage of project review, and develop; green I PS-12.5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and existing buildings.Adaptation strategies will also include increased water efficiency in buildings. I I Same actions as identified for RC-6.1 to RC-6.4 ! PL IBS' I A, I, K 4 EN Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re-use and PS-12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers. I ' l Same action as identified for PF-7.1. ENG IPL I A 13 PS-12.7 O O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native and drought-resistant planting), and preservation of open space. Same actions as identified for RC-1.1, RC-8.1 to RC-8.7. PL ENG, ! PW I A' I 4 PS-12.8 O develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in City operations and maintenance. Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. AS CM, FIN, A,B, C, PW E, K 4 Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and I workshops,facilitating energy audits for residents, and establishing PS-12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Same action as identified for RC-5.1. ICM ENG A K 4 Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise ! environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific PS-13.1 O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour map depicting future noise levels (Figure PS-10)should be used by the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility. Appendix A:Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 C U C - M 0 N G A G _ N E R A. L p i A N A-57 IDR AIINAGE II � Ii Action w T pe — 3 > I General Plan Policy 0 > c y _ V1 0 d I on-2 co °' ° Implementation Action(s) o `o = c c L C N 0 0 a a a` cn z ti 2 � I Explore the Feasibility of Extending Local Transit Service Explore the possibility of extending to adjacent jurisdictions in I cooperation with such jurisdictions who could also participate in funding, if beneficial to the City. iWork with Regional Transit Operators (Omnitrans) Develop the optimum coordination and integration of bus transit services ' ! between the local City circulator system and the regional service. Consult with Omnitrans to establish and maintain transit hubs at CM-3.4 O Victoria Gardens, Chaffey College, the Metrolink Station. and other locations as appropriate to facilitate use of transit and transfers I between transit services. Same action as identified for CM-3.1. I ENG PL I A 4 Consider and evaluate the possible relocation of the Metrolink CM-3.5 O Station to Haven Avenue to provide improved connections to transit and to support planned transit-oriented land uses along Haven Avenue. Work with Metrolink and Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) to study the feasibility of moving the Metrolink Station from its current location to Haven Avenue. Explore options for alternative funding PL ENG' _ 6 from sources other than the General Fund, such as grants, and RD E' specifically grants that promote transit-oriented development. I In addition to requiring private development to provide transit amenities, consult with regional transit operators to provide CM-3.6 O attractive and convenient bus stops, including shadelweather protection, seats, transit information, and bus shelters as appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-3.1. Also, develop a program, wish identified funding sources, for providing amenities at bus stops in the ENG I PL I D 4 I City. I I i Continue to develop and maintain a citywide bicycle network of off- street bike paths, on-street bike lanes, and bike streets to provide CM-3.7 O O connections between neighborhoods, schools, parks, civic center/facilities, recreational facilities, and major commercial centers. Appendix A:Implementation Plan F A I\I C H 0 CUCAMONGA G N �E RA L ? L A r.I A-23 i Action _T Type U ?� m General Plan Policy V d i ` ' y _ CD G « y O O Ly C C fn m r O O C .. B m `u Implementation Action(s) E c m c `o 0 0 a. :n ` n � li a : 0- Implement Implement the Bicycle Plan pursuant to Figure CM-6. Update the City's , Bicycle Circulation Plan in a format suitable for obtaining public funding. j Develop the planning, implementation, and design details of the bicycle j facility and amenity elements of the Community Mobility Chapter, Including the seting of implementation priorities and the identification of I both capital and operating funding sources. Implementation should focus on adding a no.th-south trail along either Deer Creek or ! j Cucamonga Creek as a first priority. Update the City's Trails Implementation Plan to maintain consistency A, D, with the General Plan. ENG PL E, IF 1 4 Review City ordinances to ensure that an adequate mechanism exists to I manage the use of trails only by authorized categories of users. Implementation of the Bicycle Plan may require traffic signalization at the crossing of bike paths with arterial roadways to facilitate the safe I crossing of those arterials by bicyclists and pedestrians. Signals should be convenient to bicyclists with accessible pus`;-buttons to activate the signal. Provide trail is control push button devices at convenient ! locations for bicyclists at signalized intersections on the identified Bicycle Network. CM-3.81* O Continue to encourage the provision of bicycle facilities, such as bicycle lockers and secure bike parking,throughout the City. I Identify existing locations where bicycle lockers and secure bicycle i parking could be provided at key locations throughout put the City, and develop a funding and implementation plan. I I Encourage/require the provision of bicycle lockers and secure bike parking for major development projects, as defined in the Development PL ENG A, D, A Code. E, F H Modify the Development Code to require provision of bicycle parking spaces, bicycle lockers, and, as appropriate, showers for bicycle riders at new buiidings providing significant employment, at transit stations, in the . commercial districts, and at recreational destinations in the City. Identify and implement a dedicated funding source for CM-3.9 O implementation and completion of the Bicycle Network as identified in the Bicycle Plan. Same action as identified for CM-3.7. I ENG I E, F 4 CM- O Continue to complete the installation of sidewalks and require new 3.10 development to provide sidewalks. Use the CIP to identify a schedule for installing new and replacement sidewalks throughout the City, placing priority on installing missing ENG B. C' 4 sidewalks near schools and activity centers, and -eplacing sidewalks that D, have been identified as hazardous to public safety. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-24 R A N C H O C U C A. R/ii 0 id G A G E Ni E R /r"., L P L A !q Action >+ Type Z 3 I 0 General Plan Policy c o C 0 O T U 3 cJ N _ O C O p�r O 'L' c LO i+ 07O i 2 °' Implementation AO ction(s) C C :5 ` O OL C C N C 0 c cn C :i a i Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate tra,is signals I '® utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment I as necessary, and continue to update tra-ic signal timing and ENG PW A, D j 3 synchronization plans to optimize tra is flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traific signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM-4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. I ENG A. D 3 CM-4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as idertitied for CM-4.1. ENG P1N c' F D' 3 E, Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM-4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to ;mplement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A, D, and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F 4 Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development, including non-automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffific Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance s'oeclflc improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the improvements, and new development has been established in fee ENG Pl- D 4 analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. i Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile solutions, prior to,or concurrent with,project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be provided as pari of new development projects to improve and enhance ENG p 4 access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks,trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-26r :� V C ri 0 C U C .-", M 0 Iv G ?. G c !v ER P L .^, N I I i Action T Type 3 > General Plan Policy N C 6 D = OL o _a I O c i �� Cn ry _ N T U O O w 0 o c Implementation Action(s) I E c y c l o CL CO , a cn C �' Expand recreation and cultural attractions to enhance ED-2.3 O tourism/visitor potential and to boost sales and transient occupancy tax. Develop brochures or ;inks from the City's web site to showcase the Var10L1S recreational and Culiural venues t0 attract Visitors t0 the City. Enhancement of cultural amenities, including regional entertainment RD CS A 7 options, recreation, and historic preservation, will help to embellish the I City's reputation as a destination for a wide range of visitors. Expand lodging choices in the City through the recruitment and ED-2.4 O placement of full-service hotels that will complement the existing select-service hotel portfolio. Review and update marketing strategies (land surveys, Infrastructure availability, and modes of transportation) to solicit the development of a RD PL A. G full-service lodging facility. Make sure that zoning regu'ations can accommodate a full-service hotel at desired locations. ED-3.1 I O O Continue to make public safety a priority. TUsee thannual budgeting process to allocate funding for public safety services, equipment, and facilities dommensurate with the City's service CM PD, FD A 6 objectives. i I ED-3.2 O Provide community and cultural amenities. Same action as identified for ED-2.3. CS CM, RD A 4 ED-3.3 O I Maintain a healthy fiscal balance. Use the annual budgeting process to check that revenues from all CM AS, FIN A, G 1 sources continue to more than match projected spending. ED-3.4 O O Improve internal circulation for all modes of transportation, consistent with the concept of"Complete Streets". I IGSame action as identified for LU-3.1 to 3.8. ENG ?L A, IK ED-3.5 O Facilitate development of additional local and regional entertainment venues. Focus a special economic development team on the task of working towards attracting developers and investors interested in responding to RD PL A, G 6 local and regional demand for new entertainment options. ED-3.6 O Leverage the City's quality of life amenities to attract more knowledge-based workers. Expand the Economic Development Strategy to market Rancho Cucamonga's civic assets, including parks, recreation and community RD PL, CS A, G 4 enrichment facilities and programs,trails, and quality school districts. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-30 R N C H 0 C U C M 0 N G ''. G = N ErP A L ? L A rq Action I T I .r Type W General Plan Policy 3 > c C07 0 >' U N u! >+ v 0 0 C T 0 •p N Imolementatlon Action(s) C C. uCi C O a. a cn a.. u) 2: Uc Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological, RC-8.7 O O educational, and other scientific study purposes. Same action as identified for RC-8.3. i PL ENG A, 1 4 PF-1.1 O Continue to implement high-quality standards for new public facilities and improvements to existing buildings. Design and build all City buildings to .serve as a modal for quality architectural treatment and green building design in all new and I PL ENCIAG A, B, C 5 remodeled civic facilities. PF-1.2 I p Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings,events, and celebrations. L T Maintain all public facilities and buildings o ' e i P gs to address the needs o. the various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A, B. C 3 facilities to community groups. PF-1.3 I O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers where they will serve populations with the greatest needs. Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as CS ENG, PL A neighborhoods evolve. 6 PF-1.4 O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their lifespan. Continue with o er maintenance pr P� programming and funding levels for CS, LIB, existing public facilities. PW AC FA, B. C 4 PF-1.50 O Continue to incorporate low-maintenance features into public facilities consistent with the City's sustainability plan. Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part PL, CS, of the on-going maintenance program. PW BS A, B, C 3 PF-1.6 O I Maintain multi-functional, flexible, and complementary space at community facilities. Same action as identified for PF-1.2. CS PW A, B, C 3 Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit organizations, school districts, and community organizations. Look PF-1.7 O for opportunities to create joint-use community space at facilities owned by private organizations such as faith-based groups and service clubs. Same action as identified for CS-2.5. CS I A 4 Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of PF-2.1 O O joint-use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities, to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and education. Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater optimization of school facilities to service the entire community. CS SD A, K 5 Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-44 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GEWERA. L PLAN MIS�-7C.ELLANE OUS ! I LTJ 77 7 Action Type cGeneral Plan Policy o 1 U m o C G A I U ` C 0 w r O O C o c. Implementation Action(s) E C y C o 'C I C o. U) cn e:m Ui C` Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City,to CM-11.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed beiow to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho Cucamonga. • Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new iree-way � interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. • Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, 1 7 • Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. ■ Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. I • Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from i Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. • Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock. • Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange. • Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street.. I I Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for CM-1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG I PL i A, D, I 14 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM-2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available funding. ENG PL 1 A, D, 1 14 I I CM-1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. ENG CS A' E. 4 Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and F, H, I adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A:Implementation.Plan R A N C - 0 C J C A. Nal 0 N G A GEENERAL P L A N A-19 Action Type = a) General Plan Policy o d - m O C w 2 T U r O O `� w o u Implementation Action(s) C c c O i C _ W C O 7 d CL D_ fn 7- C CO Q:' LL d Implement street design standards per this General Plan, except that modified standards may be applied where appropriate on CM-1.5 O arterial corridors relating to transit, bicycle facilities, sidewalks, and on-street parking to be context sensitive to adjacent land uses and districts, and to all roadway users, including transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Integrate into the CIP process the planning of modified standards for Foothill Boulevard to accommodate BRT and for other arterials as appropriate to reflect the bikeway plan and pedestrian improvements ENG PL A, D, 14 necessary to support Mixed Use districts. CM-1.6 O Pursue a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the BNSF Railway line. Grade separations currently exist at Haven and Milliken Avenues. Due to truck traffic associated with the southeast industrial area, the Cit supports creating a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and ENG PL A, E, I 4 the BNSF Rai!way line. CM-2.1 O O Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide. Implement the Bicycle Master Pian included in the Community Mobility Chapter. Require that pedestrian facilities and connections be provided as part of all development projects, with an emphasis on connections within Mired Use districts. Implement all bicycling and walking policies and Mobility ENG PL, RD A, D, I 4 Element components. Preparation and distribute bike route maps and bike facilities information. Publish and make readily available pedestrian route maps and pedestrian,facilities information. Encourage all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles CM-2.2 O traveled by automobiles, including enhanced transit access and land use approaches that provide compact and focused development along major transit corridors. i Same actions as identified for LU-2.1, LU-5.4, LU-5.6, and CM-2.1. I ENG PL A, D, 1 4 CM-2.3 O Support the use of hybrid,electric,and lowfzero emission vehicles. Continue to maintain the Green Team Sustainability Action Matrix that identifies current and proposed efforts that procure vehicles that includes providing gas-efficient vehicles. CM PL,AS, PW A, E, F 7 Amend the Development Code as appropriate to accommodate alternative fuel service stations and charging facilities. CM-2.4 p Replace City vehicles with energy-efficient and alternative fuel _T source models when replacing vehicles or adding to the City's fleet. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-20 R4. fJCH0 CUCAMONG AG - fJ R L PL fJ Action Type a) General Plan PolicyN i c y m 1 o _ c i V' o 4- .y d on 0 a) 5 cCO T cr `o o s g o aai implementation Action(s) C c c ` o C. c y c o a. CO - a� c •c c o: u_ a. Explore the Feasibility of Extending Local Transit Service Explore the y y jurisdictions in poss'bilit of extending to adjacent cooperation with such jurisdictions who could also participate in funding, if beneficial to the City. Work with Regional Transit Operators(Omnitrans) Develop the optimum coordination and integration of bus transit services between the local City circulator system and the regional service. i Consult with Omnitrans to establish and maintain transit hubs at O Victoria Gardens, Chaffey College, the Metrolink Station, and other CM-3.4 locations as appropriate to facilitate use of transit and transfers between transit services. Same action as identified for CM-3.1. i ENG I PL A 4 Consider and evaluate the possible relocation of the Metrolink CM-3.5 O Station to Haven Avenue to provide improved connections to transit and to support planned transit-oriented land uses along Haven Avenue. Work with Metrolink and Southern Califomia Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) to study the feasibility of moving the Metrolink Station from its current location to Haven Avenue. Explore options for alternative funding PL F NG, E, F 6 from sources other than the General Fund, such as grants, and RD specifically grants that promote transit-oriented development. In addition to requiring private development to provide transit amenities, consult with regional transit operators to provide CM-3.6 O attractive and convenient bus stops, including shade/weather protection, seats, transit information, and bus shelters as appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-3.1. Also, develop a program, with identified funding sources, for providing amenities at bus stops in the ENG City. PL D 4 Continue to develop and maintain a citywide bicycle network of off- street bike paths, on-street bike lanes, and bike streets to provide CM-3.7 O I O connections between neighborhoods, schools, parks, civic center/facilities, recreational facilities, and major commercial centers. Appendix A:Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 C U. N/I 0 IN G A G = N E R A _ P L , N A-23 Action �^ Type 3 I > General Plan Policy V r _ > _ U) m c o M:5 o c • cA M O o - w o c Implementation Action(s) E c y `o 0 a. I LL a Implement the Bicycle Plan pursuant to Figura CA/1-6. Update the City's Bicycle Circulation Plan in a format suitable for obtaining public funding. Develop the planning, implementation, and design details of the bicycle facility and amenity elements of the Community Mobility Chapter, including the setting of implementation priorities and the identification of both capital and operating runding sources. Implementation should focus on adding a north-south trail along either Deer Creek or Cucamonaa Creek as a first priority. Update the City's Trails Implementation. Plan to maintain consistency with the General Plan. ENG IPL A' D, 14 E, F, 1 Review City ordinances to ensure that an adequate mechan;sm exists to manage the use of trails only by authorized cateoories of users. Implementation of the Bicycle Plan may require traffic signalization at the crossing of bike paths with. arterial roadways to facilitate the safe crossing of those arterials by bicyclists and pedestrians. Signals should be convenient to bicyclists with accessible push-buttons to activate the signal. Provide traffic control push button devices at convenient locations for bicyclists at signalized intersections on the identified Bicycle i Network. CM-3.8 I O O Continue to encourage the provision of bicycle facilities, such as bicycle lockers and secure bike parking,throughout the City. Identify existing locations where bicycle lockers and secure bicycle parking could be Provided at key locations throughout put the City, and develop a funding and implementation pian. i I Encourage/require the provision of bicycle lockers and secure bike parking for major development projects, as defined in the Development PL ENG A, D' Code. E F H 4 I Modify the Development Code to require provision of bicycle parking spaces, bicycle lockers, and, as appropriate, showers for bicycle riders at new buildings providing significant employment, at transit stations, in the commercial districts, and at recreational destinations in the City. Identify and implement a dedicated funding source for CM-3.9 O implementation and completion of the Bicycle Network as identified in the Bicycle Plan. -- T Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG E, F 4 Cro- O Continue to complete the installation of sidewalks and require new 3.10 development to provide sidewalks. Use the CIP to identify a schedule for installing new and replacement sidewalks throughout the City, placing priority on installing missing B, C sidewalks near schools and activity centers, and replacing sidewalks that ENG 4 D, have been identified as hazardous to public safety. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-241 ? !J C H O C U C 1V� 0 Id G ^ G E N E R A L P L A N Action Type > General Plan Policy N _ J 0 w U s O U r > C `—' o Implementation Action(s) " c ° o = E E- Ln o a a. cn d cn 0 ii ` o_ Strategi_e with Foundation members to increase the range of involvement in Foundation events. CS A, H Provide a comprehensive, interconnected off-road trail system that CS-6.1 O provides alternative mobility choices throughout the entire City and increases connectivity. Continue to implement the principles of the Trails Implementation Plan. PL CS, ENG I A, I 4 Connect trails in Rancho Cucamonga to trails in the San Bernardino CS-6.2 O National Forest and other hillside open space areas. These trails shall include trailheads with vehicle parking and other amenities. Coordinate with Federal and State agencies to facilitate funding and acquisition of trail connections from the City to the San Bernardino PL CS' A 5 National Forest. Connect new trails with the North Etiwanda Preserve. ENG I CS-6.3 O Continue to incorporate, where feasible, regional and community trails along utility corridors and drainage channels. Continue to make trail connections within the City on existing public- CS, agency owned properties. PL ENG I A 5 Continue to maintain and pursue the development of planned trails CS-6.4 O and facilities for equestrian use within the Equestrian/Rural Area designation. Coni!rue to ensure that trails accommodate equestrian users through details outlined in. the Trails Implementation Plan within north ,Alta Loma PL CS, A, B and Etiwanda. ENG C, 4 Improve existing trails by removing barriers, applying sustainability CS-6.5 O concepts, improving safety and function, and providing access to adjacent trails. Continue to program funding into the CIP for the improvements to deficient equestrian trails, as outlined in the Trails Implementation Plan. ENG PL, BS A 4 Require new development to provide access to adjacent trails and CS-6.6 O provide appropriate trail amenities (e.g... benches, drinking fountains, hitching posts, bike stands, and other amenities) for all new projects located adjacent to regional or community trails. Require new development projects adiacent to Regional or Community Trails to provide access to and amenities for trails. PL ENG A. K 4 CS-6.7 O Continue to credit publically accessible trailway acreage towards meeting parkland dedication standards. Continue to allow parkland credit for trails within development projects, subject to adopted criteria. PLENG A, K 4 A-35 Appendix A:Implementation Plan �i . �. :� C H O C +J .4 Action I �, ' pe L) 3 > General Plan Policy y o o y O y •N (0 U I G U O O G _ Implementation Action(s) E c I L CN C O 11 a. u'7 I C i U I a` Develop a listing Of acceptable 'Ire-resistant plant types t0 be I I PW, Incorporated into new and rehabilitated develoonnent sites. PL CNG, IA 3 FD I Encourage streetscape design and landscaping programs for LU-10.4 O I commercial frontages that create vibrant places which support walking,bicycling,transit, and sustainable economic development. I i i Same action as identified for LU-3.4. i PL I ENG, i q 4 RD Consult with and coordinate with the Santa Fe Railway to develop LU-10.5 O and install a landscape plan for the enhancement of the railroad right-of-way. I Inventory and assess the iandscapino needs of the rail corridor, and i P ENG, consult with the rail agency to develop a plan. L RD A 6 Continue to pursue strategies to reduce long-term operation and LU-10.6 A maintenance costs within the City's Landscape Maintenance Districts and other publicly funded areas. I Inventory and prioritize the removal of turf areas within landscape medians to be replaced with plantings that reduce long-term operations I P'�N ENG I A and maintenance costs. 5 I Continue to implement and update as necessary the City's Sign LU-1 1.1 O O Ordinance in order to provide for a reasonable system of review . I and incentives for well-designed signs throughout the City. I i Establish a periodic review schedule of all City ordinances that govern aesthetics to determine if industry standards have changed or if other PL i RD A. K 4 objectives are desirable that require amendments. II � Continue to require the undergrounding of utility lines and facilities LU-11.2 O O wherever feasible to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures. I Require undergrounding of utilities for new development. Develop a strategy and prioritization list for the undergrounding utilities in developed ENG IPL A' a' 4 areas. I C, I I LU-11.3 O O Require communication towers.to be located and designed to blend with the surrounding environment Review and update design guidelines for the siting and general appearance of communication, towers to facilitate the least amount of visual intrusion. Emphasize use of stealth and architecturally integrated PL A 4 antenna. Ensure that streetscape design along roadways creates a strong ! LU-12.1 O landscaped edge, provides a coherent high-quality appearance along each route, and enhances the image of adjacent development. Appendix A:Implementation Plan R n• N C H O C U _ M 0 rq CA GE R M" L ? ! ��. I,q! A-13 Action Type c 3 o General Plan Policy ! V) CD d a, 0 >, Ly C 0 O cc w N U) T U L 0 _ = i 0 o c l Implementation Action(s) Ec w ` IL c I U) a` I �i I o`. PL,AS, ENG, A. B, Same actions as identified for RC-4.1 to RC-4.5. ENG C, E, 3 i CM, BS, I G, I PW, FIN Encourage development of transit-oriented and infill development, PS-12.3 O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative transportation. Same action.as identified for RC-4.4.I � PL ENG A, I 3 Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure,and support PS-12.4 O public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the potential for Bus Rapid Transit(BRT). Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL I ENG A, I 3 Provide green building incentives, assess green building techniques as a formal stage of project review,and develop a green PS-12.5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and existing buildings. Adaptation strategies will also include increased water efficiency in buildings. BS Same actions as identified for RC-6.1 to RC-6.4 PL ENG A, 1, K i Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re-use and ' PS-12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers. Same action as identified for PF-7.1. ENG I PL A 3 PS-12.7 O I O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native and drought-resistant planting),and preservation of open space. I Same actions as identified for RC-1.1, RC-8.1 to RC-8.7. I PL ENG, i PW A, I 4 PS-12.8 O I Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in City operations and maintenance. I I j Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. IAS CM, FIN, A.B, C, PW i t, K 4 Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and workshops,facilitating energy audits for residents,and establishing PS-12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Same action as identified for RC-5.1. I CM ENG A. K 4 Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific PS-13.1 O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour map depicting future noise levels (Figure PS-90)should be used by the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility. Appendix A:Implementation Plan R A N C H 0 C U C A 1•A 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A h, A-57 MUNI.C.IPAL UT, ' I I I ! I ! I Action 2 I Type I cI General Plan Policy c m I .> _ _a N I 7 C CV s:B O L✓ C U UU ` O O w _ u ImDlementation Action(s) c c t O 0 O a to I a u] 0: u Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological, RC-8.7 O O educational, and other scientific study purposes. Same action as identified for RC-8.3. PL I ENG I A, 1 4 PF-1.1 O Continue to implement high-quality standards for new public facilities and improvements to existing buildings. Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality architectural treatment and green building design in all new and I PL CK A, g C 5 remodeled civic faciiities. ENG PF-1.2 O I Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings,events, and celebrations. Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A, B, C 3 facilities to community groups. PF-1.3 O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers where they will serve populations with the greatest needs. Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as neighborhoods evolve. CS I ENG, PL A .6 PF-1.40 I O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their lifespan. Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for CS, LIB, existingpublic facilities. P1`d I A, B, C 4 p AC PF-1.5 I O OL ontinue to in low-maintenance features into public acilities consistent with the City's sustainability plan. I Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part I c`r� PL, CS, of the on-going maintenance program. I BS I A, B, C 3 PF-1.6 O Maintain multi-functional, flexible, and complementary space at community facilities. Same action as identified for PF-1.2. CS PW A, B, C 3 Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit organizations, school districts, and community organizations. Look PF-1.7 O for opportunities to create joint-use community space at facilities owned by private organizations such as faith-based groups and service clubs. Same action as identified for CS-2.5. CS I A d Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of PF-2.1 O O joint-use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities, to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and education. Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater optimization of school facilities to service the entire community. CS SD A, K 5 Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-44 R A h: C 0 C U C A h0i iD 1\1 G A G E r'J = R "- L P L A NI Action Type .. a 0 > General Plan Policy L - 5 y U L > C G O cu C C c '1 Cn IX _ _ y U T L C C � O O Implementation Action(s) E N o ° c c o a a l a in 0 I t= I a Pursue efforts to reduce energy consumption through appropriate RC-4.1 O energy conservation and efficiency measures throughout all segments of the community. As it becomes economically practical, identify sources and replace impo,Led, non-renewable energy resources with domestic renewable I ENG, A. B, energy sources such as solar and wind energy, recycled municipal solid PL CMC' c waste, and green waste. G I ! Promote the use of renewable energy and alternative energy technology, and support efforts to develop small-scale, distributed energy generation (e.g. solar, wind, cogeneration, and biomass) to RC-4.2 O reduce the amount of electricity drawn from the regional power grid and reduce the use of natural gas, while providing Rancho Cucamonga with a greater degree of energy and economic self- sufficiency. Provided that there would not be a decline in services to City residents or undue tax burden, use of energy e iciency and renewable energy ENG AS, CM, A, B, resources will be employed for approving capital and operational I PL C, D. 6 expenditures. E, G, I RC-4.3 O Encourage the use of solar energy systems in homes and commercial businesses. i Establish design criteria for active and passive solar applications within ENG, development proposals. PL BS A 5 I Reduce operational energy requirements through sustainable and RC-4.4 O O complementary land use and circulation planning. Support implementation of State mandates regarding energy consumption and greenhouse gas reduction,including AB32 and S13375. Promote land use and Circulation oa;i:ems that result in multi-purpose automobile trips and that facilitate the use of local and regional transit; continue to advance land use patterns that provide employment and PL I ENG A, 1 3 housing opportunities for City residents in a manner that allows for practical options for mobility other than by automobile. Support the development of private sources of sustainable and RC-4.5 O O environmentally friendly energy supplies, provided these are consistent with City aesthetic and public safety goals. Continue to make the recruitment and retention of "green" industries aRD CM, priority in conjunction with economic development strategies. PL A, G 4 Serve as a role model by adopting recognizable standards and incorporating the use of sustainable strategies for new and existing RC-5.1 O public buildings that maximize occupant health and productivity, minimize operating costs, and provide good environmental stewardship. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-4J RANI C H 0 C U C M 0 N G A G N R 4. L P L A N I i i I i I I � I f i I i I ' i ' I \ i _ Action >, T pe — CD I 0 General Plan Policy G7 - 0 U 0 r C d 0 0 N (n 0 O 0 0 Implementation Action(s) E r- c `c 0 OL 2 I (0 CL cn C Continue to assess that the recreational needs of the City's residents are consistent with the City's parkland standard, and determine possible re- use or conversion of infill sites for recreational uses to serve areas within CS PL, ENG A � the City with a disproportionate amount of parkland. i Develop parks that contribute to active and healthy lifestyles, and CS-1.2 I O allow for a balanced commitment to both organized recreation activities and passive park environments. A1ove forward with pians to continue to develop Central Park, expand Etiwanda Creek Park, add one new Community park, one new Special CS CM, A Use Facility, and two new Neighborhood parks. Incorporate active and I ENG passive facilities into new parks. I I CS-1.3 O Continue to develop Central Park as envisioned in the Central Park Master Plan. Continue to prioritize implementation of the improvements for Central Park as part of the City's CIP process. CS i ENG, PL A 4 CS-1.4 I O Pursue developing an outdoor special use facility that includes a multi-field sports complex. Continue to prioritize development of a sports complex and determine iCS ENG, A funding mechanisms, including corporate sponsorships/partnerships. I RD, PL 4 Continue to require new development to provide needed park CS-1.5 O facilities through the various measures and tools available to the City(e.g., in-lieu fees and/or land dedication). Continue to make the provision of tum-key park and recreational facilities DL ENG, A, D. I, _ _FT the first priority over in-lieu fees for new residential development. CS K _ I Pursue and expand joint-use of public lands that are available and CS-1.6 O suitable for recreational purposes, including school district properties and flood control district,water district, and other utility properties. Continue to coordinate with other agencies holding public lands for possible joint-use, trail easements, or re-use to serve park/recreation PL CS' A, K 4 particularly with school district properties. ENG i I i Encourage public safety and compatibility with adjacent uses CS-1.7 O through park location and design, including the location of buildings, lighting, parking, public transit, emergency access, and pedestrian/bicycle access. Continue to utilize the Recreation Needs and System Recommendation Study and the park master plan concept in park planning. CS PL, ENG A, K 4 CS-1.8 O O Continue to build, renovate, and maintain parks in a manner that is environmentally sustainable. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-32 R n N C N 0 C U C ", NJi G N G A G E N E R A L P L A N! AcLe T = i c3 > General Plan Policy d � r 2 O Cn U r O O C �_ Implementation Action(s) C yi O C C O a C cn C` rn C LL a` Continue to provide`Or maintenance, renovation and new construction of City parks in compliance with City policies, upgrading wastewater ENG CS, PL. A systems as needed, and as tg C 4 m'technology evolves, substitute material that I P1N could reduce maintenance costs and is environentally .friendly. Develop intermediate sized (10-12 acre) parks with lighted athletic CS-1.9 I O fields and appropriate parking to accommodate community sports programs. Update the City's Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendation Study to determine the location for intermediate-sized park sites specifically developed for athletic field use. This may include joint-use I CS PL, ENG A, B, C 7 facilities with a school district. i Integrate Healthy RC activities, classes, and programs with CS-2.1 O recreational services that contribute to the health, fitness, and minds of participants. I Continue to provide City-sponsored recreational programs and classes at i recreational centers/parks. CS I CIJI A, I 4 i CS-2.2 O O Provide high-quality Community Services programs that are flexible and responsive to the community's changing needs. i Continue to provide active recreational opportunities through leagues and organized spors. CS CM A, 1 4 Plan and conduct community special events that bring residents CS-2.3 O together to create an enhanced quality of life and promote economic development. Plan for community events through the annual budgeting process. CS _ RD, CM A, 1 4 Continue to consult with non-profit sports organizations and CS-2.4 O I recreational groups to support their offering of diverse recreational programs that complement and supplement those of the City. Continue to serve as a clearinghouse to coordinate among the various sport leagues to make fields and facilities available. CS A, 1 4 Continue to make community facilities and park amenities available CS-2.5 O for rental by community residents, non-profit groups and businesses to meet their recreational and business needs. i . 7 Continue to promote the City's various rental facility types by ensuring that a complete summary of locations, facilities, services, fees, and CS A 4 applications are available. Continue broad-based public outreach activities that inform CS-2.6 O residents of all available Community Services programs and services, and obtain input from the community regarding program and service needs. Appendix A:Implementation Plan R A N C H O C U C A M 0 N G A S E N E R A L P L A N A-33 Action w Type 3 > General Plan Policy c o c I 0 V) m c m mo C �+, 0 Implementation Action(s) 0 E c y o a o_ I cn I a I V) X L RC-8.7 O O Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological, educational;and other scientific study purposes. Same action as identified for RC-8.3. PL ENG A, I 4 PF-11 O Continue to implement high-quality standards for new public facilities and improvements to existing buildings. Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality architectural treatment and green building design in all new and I PL CNG A, B, C 5 remodeled civic facilities. PF-1.2 I O I Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings,events, and celebrations. Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A, B, C 3 facilities to community groups. PF-1.3 O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers where they will serve populations with the greatest needs. Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as neighborhoods evolve. CS I ENG, PL I A FE63 PF-1.4 O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their lifespan. Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for I PW CS, LIB, existing public facilities. I AC A, B, C 4 PF-1.5 O O Continue to incorporate low-maintenance features into public facilities consistent with the City's sustainability plan. Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part PL, CS, of the on-going maintenance program. PW BS A, B, C 3 PF-1.6 O Maintain multi-functional, flexible, and complementary space at community facilities. Same action as identified for PF-1.2. CS PW A, B, C3 Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit organizations, school districts,and community organizations. Look PF-1.7 O , for opportunities to create joint-use community space at facilities owned by private organizations such as faith-based groups and service clubs. Same action as identified for CS-2.5. i CS A 4 Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of PF-2.1 O O joint-use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities, to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and education. Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater optimization of school facilities to service the entire community. CS SD A, K 5 Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-4-. R A. f� C H 0 C U C A. INi 0 N G A. G = NI E RAL P L ^, N RAILR�OAD CROiSSINGS , i j I , � I j � I I f jF 171 Action T Type 3 > General Plan Policy e o N > r I y CJ C U . O Coil U g e Implementation Action(s) I " c ° o ° c E = in I c o CL a jCna I CnX j u a Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City,to CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the 1 identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho Cucamonga. • Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway ' interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. ENG i .4, D, I 7 ■ Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. ■ Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRP, at Etiwanda Avenue. • Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill. Boulevard to Cucamonga Creak. Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock. • Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange. I Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street. I Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for CM-1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4 I Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM-2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on availab'e ENG PL I A. D, I j funding. , CM-1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. I+ Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. A, E. 4 Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and ENG CS F H I adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A:implementation Plan R A N C H 0 C U C A NA 0 N G A G _ N _ R A L P L A. N A-19 Action Type c3 General Plan Policy o ` `~ o TW f3 L L O U CUi .0 r O O C w _ y Implementation Action(s) 0 c o ° o a. COI u- I a Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and Improve striping I and signage. Striping shall maxi ,ize room for bike lanes where feasible 1 and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue t0 Update traflC signal timing and ENG PW A. D 3 Synchronization plans to optimize tragic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest In the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide tragic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM-4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. I ENG I A, D 73 CM-4.30 Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. i _T Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW . A, D, 13 E. F Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM-4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streetsE � A, D, and streets improvements per the CIP. NG I E1 F 4 Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development,including non-automobile solutions. P.equire payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the improvements, and new development has been established in fee ENG PL p 4 analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed f-om time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile solutions, prior to,or concurrentwith,project development. I � Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact ' assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance ENG D 4 . access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools. I parks, trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. A-26 Appendix A:Implementation Plan R A N C 0 C U C A M 0 N G A G E N E - I \ L, II \i Action I i Type 3 I > General Plan Policy V U 2 U C. IS O ? U 2 O ` ImDlementation Action(s) a c O C C O aa cn I z Q •L , i i a Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City,to I I. cm-71--1 M-1.i O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of cm-71--1 Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capel Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would ofiset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes i available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho I Cucamonga. • Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. j i • Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. I "ENG I A, D, 1 7 ■ Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. ■ Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. • Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. ■ Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman i Bullock. ■ Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange. • Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street. I Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for i I CM-1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. I Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENGPL A. D, I 4 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM-1.3 I O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM-2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A p funding. CM-1.4 O p Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. i Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. l ENG CS A, E. 4 Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and F, H, I adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A:Implementation Plan C _ 0 C U C A M 0 ry r-. A G = Ni F R A L P L A N A-19 I Action T e c >° General Plan Policy U o > c w y O " N _ 3 O C Cn ?, U U 47 'Ur O O C ++ _ Implementation Action(s) � � � � •L • o o C C fA C o a n a rnCD Li Implement street design standards per this General Plan, except that modified standards may be applied where appropriate on CM-1.5 O arterial corridors relating to transit,bicycle facilities, sidewalks, and on-street parking to be context sensitive to adjacent land uses and districts, and to all roadway users, including transit, bicycles, and i pedestrians. Integrate into the CIP process the planning of modified standards for Foothill Boulevard to accommodate BRT and for other arterials as i appropriate to reflect the bikeway plan and pedestrian improvements ENG PL A, D, I a necessary to support Mixed Use districts. CM-1.6 O Pursue a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the BNSF Railway line. Grade separations currently exist at Haven and Milliken Avenues. Due to truck traffic associated with the southeast industrial area, the City supports creating a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and ENG PL A, E, 1 4 the BNSF P,ai!way line. CM-2.1 O 10 Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide. I ' Implement the Bicycle Master Plan included in the Community Mobiiity Chapter. Require that pedestrian facilities and connections be provided as part of all development projects, with an emphasis on connections within Mixed Use districts. Implement all bicycling and walking policies and Mobility ENG PL, RD A, D. 1 ^ Element components. Preparation and distribute bike route maps and bike facilities information. Publish and make readily available pedestrian route maps and I pedestrian facilities information. Encourage all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles CM-2.2 O traveled by automobiles, including enhanced transit access and land use approaches that provide compact and focused development along major transit corridors. Same actions as identified for LU-2.1, LU-5.4, LU-5.6, and CM-2.1. I ENG I PL A, D, 1 14 CM-2.3 O Support the use of hybrid,electric, and lowlzero emission vehicles. I Continue to maintain the Green Team Sustainability Action Matrix that identifies current and proposed efforts that procure vehicles that includes providing gas-efficient vehicles. PL, AS, CM PW A, E, F 7 Amend the Development Code as appropriate to accommodate alternative fuel service stations and charging facilities. CM-2.4 O TReplace City vehicles with energy-efficient and alternative fuel source models when replacing vehicles or adding to the City's fleet. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-20 A N C H 0 C U C ^, ��q O N G P. G s N r, Action Type C General Plan Policy I m L O r 0 ' L 0 O c c 'y U m rI L 00 ?_ �, Implementation Action(s) C L 0V)V) c o I CL Cf) l l a nN I ' a Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic slonals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment I. as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3 synchronization plans to optimize tragic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and I pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications Infrastructure necessary to operate a CityVdlde traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM-4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG A, D 3 CM-4.3 I O I Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. I Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG I PW A, D, 3 E, F Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM-4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets A, D, and streets improvements per the CIP. I ENGT F 4 Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development, including non-automobile solutions. � I Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the improvements, and new development has been established in fee `NG PL p 4 analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. I Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile solutions, prior to,or concurrent with,project development. I Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance i ENG D 4 access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, Parks,trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. I Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-25 RA !v C 0 C U C A M O N D iAction I w Type ; 3 0General Plan Policy V a) X 0 T I U i w U ++ U) 7 W W a _ C •y U) o •o c Implementation Action(s) i N L a. c a. I o a a i JJ ui I cnn i L ED-3.71 O I p Support access to local and regional educational resources that i provide educational opportunities to local residents and workers. Coordinate with iotal and regional centers for higher education to Promote access to and p-ograms for additional educational opportunities. i RD PL, CM A 4 I ED-4.1 O Encourage high-quality design for infill development and continue to support new high quality uses. — — --[ Sarna action as identified for LU-5.1 to 5.6. IPL RD, A, I, K 4 ENG -ED-4.2 - — O- Make green building and green business a priority. i Same action as identified for LU-7.1 to 7.3. i PL RC A, G T3 Improve connectivity between develo ment ED-4.3 OLl more cohesive atmosphere. p projects to create a i ; Same action as identified for LU-2.3. PL ENG A 5 ED-4.4 O I Focus on enhancements to Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. I Same action as identified for LU-5.1 to 5.6. PL I RD' A. I, K 15 ENG i I ED-4.5I i O Review and understand the fiscal, job creation, and economic benefits of new proposed uses in the City's industrial-zoned areas. Focus a special economic development effort on assessing where re-use r or conversion of industrial properties to other uses could occur. identify potential conflicts in order to develop a strategy for when such RD PL A. G 5 conversions could be considered a benefit versus a cost. ---------------------------- ED-5.1 O Engage in regional transit planning efforts. Continue to be involved in plannino efforts to address regional I i transportation solutions, particularly those providing 'transit options. In I 1 particular, work with Omnitrans in its efforts to establish BRT service in PL ENG A, K 4 Rancho Cucamonga. FD-5 2I O Continue to capitalize on proximity to interstate 10, Interstate 15, State Route 210,and the LA/Ontario International Airport. Review and assess the effectiveness of way-finding signage to ensure that the City's accessibility to 1-10, 1-15 and SP,-210 from major areas of City commerce hubs is easily ascertained and facilitated. Begin RD PL, ENG A, G 4 programs to improve such signage where it is deficient or confusing. Maximize the benefits of a major airport just outside of the City's borders. Provide adequate park and recreational facilities that meet the City CS-1.1 O standard of 5.0 acres of parkland (including trails and special facilities)for every 1,000 persons. Appendix A:Implementation Plan R A Nd C H O C U Civ^ O N G G = N � - A L F) _ 1, N A-31 � I I i ; T RAF FIC! rte\ { \ r Action I ,, Type 3 > General Plan Policy N 0 U 0. w = ;A _ _ L r � A O CS .�'+ O p C `—' I •r' ° Implementation Action(s) `" c c 0 0 c n I L m I a` CO z ii a CM_ Continue to provide pedestrian amenities on sidewalks on major O streets that are key pedestrian routes, including the 3.11 — g provision of benches,shade trees,and trash cans. Identify key pedestrian travel corridors citywide, and prepare a Citywide i Pedestrian Clrcu;atlon Study to determine pedestrian amenity needs, capital and operating funding sources, and a phased Implementation program. Develop a program for gradually installing public amenities such as streetlights, benches, trash containers, art, drinking fountains, I ENG PL A, g, landscaping, etc. that 1N111 enhance the pedestrian environment and C, D o encourage increased use of transit. Use both the CIP process and other funding sources, including a program whereby businesses or residents may sponsor street furniture and/or landscaped areas. i CM- Continue to require that the siting and architectural design of new 3 0.12 development promote safety, pedestrian-friendly design, and access to transit facilities. Develop standards to be applied to development projects along 'transit corridors that require transit and pedestrian accessibility. PL ENG 4 Establish a number of bike hubs in the City (centralized locations CM- O with convenient bike parking for trip destinations or transfer to 3.13 other transportation modes), at key transit nodes, and at , commercial nodes. Conduct a study to determine the best iocations for bike hubs in the City, and develop a plan, way,inding program, and implementation process for Aa g providing bike hubs that provide secure bicycle lockers, bike racks, and ENG PL, RD I C, D connections to transit at key locations in the City. CM-0 I Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access to. local and regional 3.14 transit, including facilitating connections to transit. Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PIL I CM_ Coordinate the provision of the non-motorized networks (bicycle 3.15 and pedestrian) with adjacent jurisdictions to maximize sub- regional connectivity. Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL i A, E, F 4 CM- O Establish fixed-route local circulator bus service connecting major 3.16 activity centers. Explore development of a axed-route local circulator bus system, station I I location, and funding mechanisms. ENG PL 4, E, H 15 I Continue to implement traffic management and traffic signal CM-4.1 O operations measures along the arterial roadway to minimize delay and congestion for all modes, without adversely impacting transit; bicycles,and pedestrians. Appendix A:Implementation Plan R A N C H O C U C A IA 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A N A-25 Action T pe > General Plan Policy o N d - O LC L d q�j - lr _ U u1•r„Z� O o Z, C `—' " 0 Implementation Action(s) c c oE C y c o C COM. I CL u�-) LL d Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW I A. D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM-4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. _-TSame action as identified for CM-4.1. I ENG I A D 3 CM-4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG I PW a F 3 Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; Clvt-4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets A, p. and streets improvements per the CIP. ENG E, F 4 Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development, including non-automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the improvements, and new development has been established in fee ENG PL D 4 analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. I Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts I CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation. measures, including non-automobile solutions, prior to,or concurrent with,project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance ENG p 4 access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks, trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-26 R A N C ;-I 0 C U C ..^. (til 0 UNFFUTURE . .. iNDED � I FLI � Action. j j Type ! I Z 3 I > General Plan Policy O V w N 7 '- O Ly I C Cf) B o Fplementationc w c Action(s) cc c o 0. o a a Cl) i a` I U) �i a` Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City,to CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Caoital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho Cucamonga. i • Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day I Creek Boulevard. ! ENG A, D, 1 7 Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan. Street and j Wilson Avenue. Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. ° Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman j I Bullock. ° Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange_. ia Complete Youngs Canyon from Chert' Avenue to Banyan Street. Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for CM-1.2 A convenient automobile. transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. i ENG PL A, D, I 4 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM-2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on avaiiabie X unding. ENG PL A, D. 1 4 CM-1.4 O I O I Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrar,s regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. ENG CS A, E. Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and I F, H. I I adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A:Implementation Plan P, A I'I' C H 0 C U C M 0 1. a A G - tN - R A L P N A-19 l Action > Type a c 3 > General Plan Policy o U 0 w N C� v1'n O Cl' L� C Lv fn > V CU O O C U 0 Implementation Actlon(s) E � ? o CL i L c c y 2 V) a. V LL I Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate tra is signals Utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and i ENG PW A, D 3 synchronization pians to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial i corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and i pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. i Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM-4.2 O safe operation of all modes; including transit bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG I A, D 3 CM-4.3 O I Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. 4, , Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PWD3 E, F Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition: CM-4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets I ENG 4• D, and streets improvements per the CIP. I F F 4 Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development,including non-automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG Pi p improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shat be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. I I Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile solutions, prior to,or concurrent with,project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance ENG I I D 4 access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks, 'trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. .Appendix A:implementation Paan A-26 R A N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A G - N E P A L P L ?, i\ Action Type 0 I > General Plan Policy U QQ. I ` CJ d Ci v1'- O .' rte• � i iO C w U " c Implementation ,Action(s) a 'n ? o o ° c 3 c+ E L o_ ui u_ a. Continue to assess that the recreational needs of the City's residents are ! consistent With the City's parkland standard, and determine possible re- ons • CS , PL, ENG A 4 USB Or conversion Oi Infill sites for recreational uses to Serve areas within the City with a disproportionate amount of parkland. Develop parks that contribute to active and healthy lifestyles, and CS-1.2 O allow for a balanced commitment to both organized recreation activities and passive park environments. Move forward with plans to continue to develop Central Park, expand Etiwanda Creek Park, add one new Community park, one new Special i CM, Use =ac;l!ty, and two new Neighborhood parks. Incorporate active and I Ca ENG 4 passive facilities into new parks. I I I i CS-1.3 O Continue to develop Central Park as envisioned in the Central Park Master Plan. Continue to prioritize implementation of the improvements for Central CS ENG, PL A 4 Park as par of the City's CIP process. I CS-1.4 O Pursue developing an outdoor special use facility that includes a multi-field sports complex. Continue to prioritize development of a sports complex and determine i CS I ENG, A 4 funding mechanisms, including corporate sponsorships/partnerships. RD, PL I Continue to require new development to provide needed park CS-1.5 O facilities through the various measures and tools available to the City(e.g.,in-lieu fees and/or land dedication). Continue to make the provision of turn-key park and recreational facilities ENG, A, D, I, the first priority over in-lieu fees for new residential development. PL I CS K 4 I Pursue and expand joint-use of public !ands that are available and CS-1.6 O suitable for recreational purposes, including school district properties and flood control district,water district, and other utility properties. Continue to coordinate with other agencies holding public lands for ! possible joint-use, trail easements, or re-use to serve parkirecreation PL FNG A, K 4 particularly with school district properties. Encourage public safety and compatibility with adjacent uses CS-1.7 O through park location and design, including the location of buildings, lighting, parking, public transit, emergency access, and pedestrian/bicycle access. Continue to utilize the Recreation Needs and System Recommendation CS IPL, ENG A, K 4 Study and the park master plan concept in park planning. i CS-1.8 O O Continue to build, renovate, and maintain parks in a manner that is environmentally sustainable. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-32 R A N C H 0 C U C A NA 0 1 G G E N E P, A L P L A N Action Type 3 > General Plan Policy I U I O T i '7 f3 C i - N a O up O c • cn T U I i T u Implementation Action(s) OL c o ° c E M. W I c o a a l CO a LL a Continue to provide for maintenance, renovation and new construction of City parks in compliance with City policies, upgrading wastewater CS, PL, systems as needed, and as technology evolves, substitute material that i ENC PWA, B, C a could reduce maintenance costs and is environmentally friendly. I Develop intermediate sized (10-12 acre) parks with lighted athletic CS-1.9 O fields and appropriate parking to accommodate community sports programs. i Update the City's Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendation Study to determine the location for intermediate-s ed park sites specifically developed for athletic field use. This may include joint-use CS PL, ENG A, B, C 7 facilities with a school district. I Integrate Healthy RC activities, classes, and programs with CS-2.1 O recreational services that contribute to the health, fitness, and minds of participants. i Continue to provide City-sponsored recreational programs and classes at recreational centers/parks. I CS CM q I a I CS-2.2 O I O Provide high-quality Community Services programs that are flexible and responsive to the community's changing needs. Continue to provide active recreational opportunities through leagues 1 and organized sports. CS Cho q I 4 Plan and conduct community special events that bring residents CS-2.3 . O together to create an enhanced quality of life and promote economic development. I I I Plan for community events through the annual budgeting process. CS I RD, CM i A, I 4 Continue to consult with non-profit sports organizations and CS-2.4 O recreational groups to support their offering of diverse recreational programs that complement and supplement those of the City. Continue to serve as a clearinghouse to coordinate among the various spo;-t leagues to make fields and facilities available. CS A, I 4 i Continue to make community facilities and park amenities available CS-2.5 O for rental by community residents, non-profit groups and businesses to meet their recreational and business needs. i I Continue to promote the City's various rental facility types by ensuring that a complete summary of locations, facilities, services, fees, and CS A 4 applications are available. Continue broad-based public outreach activities that s of all available Community Services programs and inform CS-2.6 O resident services, and obtain input from the community regarding program and service needs. I Appendix A:Implementation Plan R A N C n 0 C U C M O ,rJ GGENERAL P L A Iv A-33 Action Type Z 0 General Plan Policy o j C y _ 7 M:5 o i c CO �. M c c' c 0 Implementation Action(s) E 0 c n ` e. CL CO a` V) LL o Expand recreation and cultural attractions to enhance ED-2.3 O tourism/visitor potential and to boost sales and transient i occupancy tax. Develop brochures or links from the City's web site to showcase the i various recreational and cultural venues to attract visitors t0 the City. Enhancement of cultural amenities, including regional entertainment RD CS A 7 options, recreation, and historic preservation, will help to embellish the City's reputation as a destination for a wide range of visitors. I i Expand lodging choices in the City through the recruitment and ED-2.4 O placement of full-service hotels that will complement the existing select-service hotel portfolio. Review and update marketing strategies (land surveys, infrastructure availability, and modes of transportation) to solicit the development of a full-service lodgingfacility. Make sure that zoning regulations can RD PL A, G 4 accommodate a VI-service hotel at desired locations. I ED-3.1 O I O Continue to make public safety a priority. Use the annual budgeting process to allocate funding for public safety services, equipment, and facilities commensurate with the City's service CM PD, FD A 6 objectives. ED-3.2 O I Provide community and cultural amenities. Same action as identified for ED-2.3. CS CM, RD q 4 ED-3.3 O Maintain a healthy fiscal balance. Use the annual budgeting process to check that revenues from all sources continue to more than match projected spending. CM AS, FIN A, G 1 ED-3.4 O O Improve internal circulation for all modes of transportation, consistent with the concept of"Complete Streets". Same action as identified for LU-3.1 to 3.8. ENG PL I A, G• K ED-3.5 O Facilitate development of additional local and regional entertainment venues. Focus a special economic development team on the task of working towards attracting developers and investors interested in responding to RD PL A, G 6 local and regional demand for new entertainment options. ED-3.6 O Leverage the City's quality of life amenities to attract more knowledge-based workers. Expand the Economic Development Strategy to market Rancho Cucamonga's civic assets, including parks, recreation and community RD PL, CS A, G 4 enrichment facilities and programs,trails, and quality school districts. Appendix;A:Implementation Plan A-30 R A N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A N I Action i Type = U 3 oGeneral Plan Policy V) „T, L U N 7 N �' N v7 9 O — �' •N Cn � I I 2O c O Implementation Action(s) I c c C O I _ C N = O z a` cn CL I CM x �i a. I PL,AS, A B Same actions as identified for RC-4.1 to RC-4.5. ENG `NG' C, E, 3 CM, 5S, G I PW, FIN Encourage development of transit-oriented and infill development, PS-12.3 O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative transportation. Same action as identified for RC-4.4. I PL ENG 1 A, I 13 Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure,and support PS-12.4 O public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the potential for Bus Rapid Transit(BRT). Same action as identified for RC-4.4. j PL I ENG A, I 3 Provide green building incentives, assess green building techniques as a formal stage of project review, and develop a green PS-12,5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and existing buildings.Adaptation strategies will also include increased water efficiency in buildings. I Same actions as identified for RC-6.1 to RC-6.4 PL 6S'ENG A, 1, K 4 i Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re-use and PS-12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers. Same action as identified for PF-7.1. I ENG PL A 13 PS-12.7 O I O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native _T and drought-resistant planting),and preservation of open space. Same actions as identified for RC-1.1, RC-8.1 to RC-8.7. PL ENG, A 1 4 PW PS-12.8 O I Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in City operations and maintenance. Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. i AS CM, FIN, A,B, C, 4 PW E, K Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and workshops,facilitating energy audits for residents,and establishing PS-12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Same action as identified for RC-5.1. CM ENG A, K 4 1 Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific PS-13.'1 I O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour map depicting future noise levels(Figure PS-10)should be used by the City as a guide to land uselnoise compatibility. Appendix A:Implementation Plan R A N C - 0 C U C .A M O N I C A G = N E R A L P L A N A-57